By Natalie Gewargis

Oct 22, 2008 9:24am

A Big Wrinkle in Palin’s $150,000 Clothing Allowance

Following up on that Politico story about the RNC apparently spending more than $150,000 on clothes for Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin…

I wonder if the governor knows that she’s going to have to pay taxes on those clothes, even if she ultimately gives them away?

Tax experts say that even if she only wears them for professional reasons — locked away in a special "candidate" cabinet, say — Palin will be on the hook for those fancy new duds just as if someone had written her a check for $150,000.

Wonder if she knows that.

- jpt

UPDATE: Someone familiar with this situation writes that, "Because these accessories belong to the RNC and they will be returned to the national committee, it does not trigger any gift tax liability." So these clothes were purchased for Palin but she will return them to the RNC and they won’t count as gifts? Perhaps some tax lawyers/accountants out there can shed some light on this.

User Comments

Can we assume, Jake, that you are similarly looking into what the Obamas have spent on their clothing during their 20 months on the campaign trail?
That is a whole lot of fancy clothes!

Posted by: Michelle | October 22, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

the lady thinks being near russia is foreign policy experience – of course she doesn’t know that.

Posted by: nate | October 22, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

If the RNC owns the clothes, and merely allowed Palin to wear them to one event, I don’t see how she would be on the hook for taxes. But I’m certainly no tax expert.

Posted by: Alan | October 22, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

LOL, Somehow I get the feeling that she could care less. She like her running mate “McBush” are both Shysters in every sense of the word.
Jiff

Posted by: Jesse Wilder | October 22, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I’m sure she does know. She isn’t nearly as stupid as the media tries to portray her. (Wonder if this comment will be “allowed”…lol)

Posted by: Michelle | October 22, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Well that makes me really glad I buy my own clothes!!!

Posted by: TigerLily | October 22, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Michelle,
There is a fundamental difference. Barack and Michelle did not use money donated for their campaign to buy clothes for themselves. And Michelle Obama’s dresses fall far short of Cindy’s $350 000 whopper outfit.
Doesn’t Palin have plenty of these clothes at home already?

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Hey Obamessiah!
Where’s your US birth certificate?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Posted by: Susan | October 22, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Gosh and Geez! $50,000 at Saks and $75,000 at Needless-Markup. Combine this with the Governor’s livin’ at home per diems and Alaska’s taxpayers havin’ to reimburse her for draggin’ her kids to five star hotels in Philadelphia and New York. Aint this a heckuva thing?
Sounds pretty elitist to me…definitely doesn’t reflect small town values like thrift and personal responsibility. The Governor and First Dude sure like livn’ off of other peoples’ dimes!
Darn it all. In Brooklyn (AKA Unreal America), we call people like this leeches. You betcha!

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 22, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Michelle:
The Obamas bought their own clothing with their own money!

Posted by: Shay | October 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Yeah she sure does relate to Joe Six packs,And Joe the Plumbers! Anyone on board here ever go on that kind of shopping spree? One could only dream!

Posted by: Angie | October 22, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

After what I have seen and heard of Sarah Palin, I don’t think she knows she will be taxed on the clothing, even though they may go to charity!
Sorry Sarah, this is not another freebie!

Posted by: Shay | October 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Alan,
If they hang in her closets they are hers. If she has to “check them out” from the party closets and return them like a rented tux, then she is off the hook!

Posted by: Richard | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Opinion Letter No. 90-23
June 28, 1990
Vital Statistic Records
Section 338-18, Hawaii Revised Statutes, specifically restricts access to vital statistic records
maintained by the Department of Health. This statute restricts access to vital statistic records to the
registrant, the spouse of a registrant, parent of the registrant, a descendant of a registrant, and a
person having a common ancestor with the registrant who can demonstrate that the information is
necessary for the determination of personal or property rights. We conclude that this section was
intended to permit individuals to obtain copies of vital records irrespective of whether they are related
to the registrant, as long as the information is necessary for the determination of personal or property
rights.
acting on behalf of” a descendant of a registrant may inspect
that registrant’s vital records. Those who don’t stand in the
relationship to the registrant required by section 338-18(b),
Hawaii Revised Statutes, may inspect a particular vital
statistic record if the DOH is satisfied that the information is
“necessary for the determination of personal or property
rights.” Whether one stands in the relationship required by
section 338-18(b), Hawaii Revised Statutes, is left to the
determination of the DOH, not the Office of Information
Practices (“OIP”). Similarly, whether the information is
“necessary for the determination of personal or property rights”
What’s Obama’s birth certificate have anything to do with his citizenship?
Born to an American white woman!!!
Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Sarah Palin spent $150,000 of TAXPAYER MONEY on her frivolous wardrobe, Louis Vuitton handbags for her children, etc. This is like John McCain spending $5,000 of TAXPAYER MONEY on makeup to prettify himself, though I suppose the $300,000 outfit Cindy wore to the RNC was paid for by the McCain’s own vast personal fortune. This is no different than those AIG executives going on their lavish taxpayer-funded resort holiday. The McCain campaign hides behind people like “Joe the Plumber” (not his real name or occupation) while they lavish OUR money on luxury items for themselves. How on earth can McCain criticize Obama for NOT accepting taxpayer funding for his campaign? Let’s get rid of these Republican deadbeats…ALL OF THEM… on November 4.

Posted by: Sean | October 22, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Susan:
Where is your birth cerificate?
Why are you worried about Obamas birth certificate??? Everyone knows where he was born. Where have you been hiding, under a rock?
You’ve been told where Obama was born, yet you choose not to believe it. You’re on your own!

Posted by: Shay | October 22, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I feel positive she did not…..don’t ask me why I doubt her ability to understand simple facts…..but you can bet that she is now talking to old Johnny about how to make the crooked talk express paying up.

Posted by: Grissom | October 22, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

So who is the elitist? Palin is a phony…

Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I wonder when Sara will learn the United States Constitution LOL HA,She takes a Job Offer she know nothing about! oh by the way I am Pro-America real American voting For Barack Obama!

Posted by: Angie | October 22, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Susan I bet most of McCain’s backwoods homeborn supporters dont have birth certificates at all…But moving back into reality…I have a new Name for the Pig in Lipstick… Caribou Welfare Barbie.
BTW I work as a secretary for a defense company and there is not a better welfare system in the country than the defense industry…$7,000 1st class airfare to Europe, $2,000 meals, Posh conventions in fancy hotels, Daily per diem because making over $200,000 a year isnt enough to cover their own food…Guess who pays for all that in the long run? THE TAXPAYERS.

Posted by: Leah the Secretary | October 22, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

I’m sure she does know. She isn’t nearly as stupid as the media tries to portray her
========================================
I disagree. She is an intellectual lightweight with intellectual curiousity. Same as George W. Bush. If looks stupid in the media it is because she acts stupid.

Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Brooklyn – Needless-Markup. That is great. Michelle shops at Target and a place called Black and White (I think that is the name). They have one in Atlanta. I went in and looked at the clothes. $78 bucks for a pair of khakies is a bit steep for my budget but not out of sight.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 22, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

i disagree. She is an intellectual lightweight with intellectual curiousity. Same as George W. Bush. If looks stupid in the media it is because she acts stupid.
==========================================
It doesnt take brains to be a greedy self serving Jerk….

Posted by: Becky | October 22, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Alan raises a good point. If she doesn’t take ownership of the clothes, then she shouldn’t have to pay taxes on them. Just as someone that wears a television wardrobe wouldn’t pay taxes on it as long as the clothes remain the property of the production company or studio.

Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

I think all the candidates have expensive clothes that they either purchased or were purchased for them. If they were purchased by their party, then I take issue with that because when I contribute money to a party, I expect it will be used for the party, not clothes. That being said, the reason this is news is that Palin has gone around saying that she’s one of us, that she’s a hockey mom, that she understands what we go through becuase she’s just like us. The other 3 candidates have not said that.

Posted by: TexGal51 | October 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Angie – AMEN – Remember too Obama taught Constitutional Law so he should be fairly knowledgable of the Consitituion an real novilty after the last 8 to 16 years.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I thought hairplugs told everybody the election is about the economy, not personal attacks.

Posted by: vin | October 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Just remember those overpriced clothes were paid for by the PUBLIC FUNDING of McCain’s campaign. That means YOU personally paid for them if you are a taxpayer. Isn’t that special?

Posted by: Sean | October 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

ohhh, she’ll just wear em around the house in Wasilla, then charge it back to the state of Alaska like all her other home expenses!

Posted by: RH Omea | October 22, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Most stores have a 90 day return policy, which is shorter than the amount of time between her nomination and Election Day.
Though maybe she can just put everything on Ebay!

Posted by: Danny | October 22, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I encourage everyone to check out Jake Tapper’s taxes, his shopping habits and his political affiliation. This is not unbiased reporting Jake. You are not fooling anyone. In fact I think Obama gives you a tingle down your leg just like Chris Matthews admitted to.

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Socialism! Using Public money to purchase clothing for the Candidate.

Posted by: Thinking | October 22, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Jake , the real story here and now is the lack of the MSM reporting on the theft of the election by a sect of angry nuts; ACORN!! Alabama is now weighing in on voter fraud in its’ counties. ACORNS root prints are over it. I thought it was your job to R-E-P-O-R-T the news. Jake, voter fraud is NEWS!! ACORN being a partisan group when it takes tax payer money is NEWS. Try earning the money you are suppose to be earning. Grow a set and blaze a trail for others to follow. Lead by example….don’t be like the sheep of the MSM and boldly go where they fear! Someones clothes and whether they paid taxes is stupid!! Those that argue about it are brainless sheep. BAAAA!

Posted by: commrat72 | October 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Another witch hunt by the left wing liberal domocratic party news media. If this is all you have….your in big trouble with the
Independent voters. The more the news media goes after Palin, the more votes she picks up.. Keep up the good work!!!
CBSNEWS w/ Couric shed a half a million viewers, falling from 6.4 million to 5.9 million; ABCNEWS dropped from 8.1
million to 7.6 million; NBCNEWS slumped from 8.2 million to 7.8 million.
I’ll see you in the un-employment line with the rest of the left wing media

Posted by: bluefox9 | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

If she has to pay taxes on it, it’s not public money!

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

That’s a MAVERICKY makeover!

Posted by: Cheri | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

ok…. kind of a non issue for me as an obama supporter
its not like she bought the clothes
or perhaps she didnt even know how much they cost or where they were even from…
i think the only point one could argue is that she is a candidate that is being tailored to fit a perception and isnt authentic
but that argument seems in and of itself stupid because what candidate isnt being tailored to fit a persona or a role…
i dont know… i mean.. maybe the number is shocking, but i just dont care
i hate that im defending palin on this one because i think she is a terrible candidate, but… yea… lets move on to some substance

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Sarah Palin is Caribou Barbie. Hey McCain ain’t that pork?

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

And the endless Republican-backed lies continue to be exposed for what they are, one by one. The GOP used to stand for honor and decency – no more…And, by the way, the Obamas actually pay for their own clothes!
“Only Difference Is They Got Caught
New York Post forced to retract phony story about Michelle Obama dining on lobster and caviar in her room at the Waldorf-Astoria.
Her not even staying at the Waldorf was the first of several problems with the story.”

Posted by: Go_Panthers | October 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Bhrandon,
Well, I guess they have the right to spend their donations how they want, but I think they’ve got no business calling Obama an elitist.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Palin made her grand debut at the Republican National Convention railing against unnecessary spending in government, boasting that she got rid of the private plane and private chef for the Alaska Governorship.
So if she then goes out wearing 150K in CLOTHES paid for by her own party, that certainly raises questions about her fiscal discipline, as well as her dedication to rufflin feathers and bein a reformer.

Posted by: Danny | October 22, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Well, Sarah was hired by McCain to be a Cheerleader, she might as well look the part.

Posted by: Blindhowlin | October 22, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

ACORN is a really lame tactic, they have to by law turn in every fraudulent registration
they flag them but they cant not turn those registrations in…
and if someone is registered sixteen times, that in NO WAY means they will be able to vote sixteen times
i have yet to hear a substantiated case of actual VOTER FRAUD by acorn.
I have yet to see anyone who has been able to vote twice because of acorn
this is a really really terrible tactic to purge voter roles by the republicans that happens every year…
registration fraud is not voter fraud
and it does appear that there are actual cases of VOTER FRAUD being done by republican operatives

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Maybe you should check out who payed for Barack Obamas house in Chicago. Rezko!

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Remember, Palin worked from home over 300 days as Governor (more than 50% of the time she was governor) and billed Alaskans a per diem expense. (This is illegal under the IRS, but they never forced her to pay her bills).
She charged Alaskans for her families traveling expenses, but never reported this to the IRS. (Again, illegal, but the IRS never did anything).

Posted by: Dan | October 22, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

She will just say that they were for her girls and bill them to the campaign.

Posted by: Keith | October 22, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Is Caribou Barbie aka Sarah Palin smarter than a third grader? The answer is no. She doesn’t even know what a VP does in the White House.

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Just for the record, it wasn’t the public campaign financing that bought the clothes, it was the RNC, which takes private donations.
It’s still ridiculous, though. Apparently they even bought the baby a new stroller. Sounds like Sarah is making out like a bandit…. she gets to be a “star” and beef up her show business image, because she won’t be going to Washington any time soon.
She’s milking this for all it’s worth, just like she does to the taxpayers in Alaska.
And a word from the Fashion Police: Sarah, please ditch those black hooker boots and the tight red suit. You look like an X-rated Mrs. Santa Claus in that get-up.

Posted by: mavisdarling | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Sarah Palin is Caribou Barbie. Hey McCain ain’t that pork?

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Speaking of hair plugs…Who paid for Joe Bidens plugs. Were they part of Senate medical coverage?
Does he take a deduction for clothing necessary for work on his taxes?
America needs to know both sides of a story.

Posted by: smith | October 22, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

So this is the best Jake Tapper can do? There is a lot greater issues out there rather than dissecting everything the republicans do. I am an independent, so I see both sides and I certainly don’t see anyone commenting on the finances of ANY democrats – Obamas, Bidens, and especially the Clintons (who are infamous for their spending habits!). So if this is only going to be one-sided and your not going to show us what the democrats have spent to do a comparison – this is an absolutely pointless story. As a senior correspondent, I would hope to see better news writings from you in the future.

Posted by: realistic one | October 22, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Yeah,
Those of you yelling about ACORN, newflash, someone working for the Republicans got arrested for voter fraud including switching Democrat’s party affiliation to Republican without their permission.
ACORN is basically that they paid people to register voters. Some lazy people didn’t want to do the actual work to earn their money, so opened a phone book or scribbled random names. These people will not even show up on election day if they don’t exist or never got themselves registered. There was no morive to rig the election, just to earn money “Registering” people.
If you still don’t believe me, well, McCain was a keynote speaker for ACORN a few years ago.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

grey matter,
oh i absolutely agree with that… for the republicans to call obama an elitist is THE STUPIDEST THING I HAVE EVER HEARD….
it was stupid when the clintons did it, its stupid when the republicans and mccains do it
i mean…. first off they all have far more money in their personal accounts than the obamas
and to demonize the word elitist to mean something bad is stupid
why would you want a non elite president?
we want the most elite sports people playing sports, we want the most elite military
i mean we thrive on elite, but for some reason we want some moronic unelite cant graduate high school to run teh country?
i mean what?
i want someone smarter than me running this country, i dont want sarah palin i can hardly answer a question running this country, or john mccain i have oen kind of ideology and no idea what to do about hte economic crisis running this country.
i dont want a plumber running this country, i want a highly intelligent leader someone who has a grasp of many areas of expertise and will be able to make intelligent decisions about any crisis that pops up
this is why im voting for barack obama

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Did Sarah Palin get her cloths from the “Real America”? Oops they don’t have good stores with expensive cloths.

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!
Wait a MINUTE!!!! Saks in St. Louis and New York, Neimann Marcus (spelling might be wrong, I can’t afford to shop there) -
Those are cities, right? Sarah Palin doesn’t shop in the real America!!!! Right? Cities aren’t in the real America, right? Don’t liberals shop there? She might have bought those clothes from a freakin’ liberal, everyone knows they’re anti-American. And one of ‘em, since they’re not in the real America, may be an Obama supporter. That’s about the equivalent of being a TERRORIST!!!!
So, are you telling me that Sarah Palin bought $150,00 worth of clothes in foreign countries, from anti American liberal terrorists?
I think she can get out of this with the Ted Stevens defense, right?
“I have closets full of clothes that aren’t mine” – that’d work, right?
last question, is she going to wear her Anti-American Foreign Liberal Terrorist outfit to the deposition today?

Posted by: Steve from NH | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

realistic one,
No one really has an issue with this, if it weren’t for the fact the McCain has been branding the guy who may be doing well now but grew up in a single parent home and did not have any connections but worked hard to get into the Ivy League elitist.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Simply disgusting. She is indeed a great imposter. When millions of Americans are suffering through the financial crisis, a wannabe VP candidate splurges on her clothes.And you expect her to emphatise with the pain felt by the rest. She is simply hoodwinking the voters!Please wake up.

Posted by: micheal vernon | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

rezko LOL
keating five
kthnxbye!

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

maria: “Maybe you should check out who payed for Barack Obamas house in Chicago. Rezko!”
Obama’s house in Chicago was paid by Obama using the proceeds from his book royalties, which skyrocketed after his speech 4 years ago. He paid off his student loans from the same proceeds. He PURCHASED a 10′ strip of land from Rezko at market price to enlarge his back yard. It looks a bit dodgy that Rezko (his wife actually) bought the adjacent lot with pinpoint perfect timing to sell Obama a coveted slice of it.
This is all public record. Maria: Are you ignorant of these facts, highly-publicized almost a year ago during the primaries – or deliberately lying?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Absolutely Incredible !!!!! Joe Biden states the country is in for a manufactured crisis from abroad to test Obama if he is elected and ABC News has a front page article on Gov. Palin’s clothing expense. I never realized until about a month ago how biased the media is to the democrats. God help us.
Kenny Cahill
Painesville, OH

Posted by: Kenny Cahill | October 22, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Hey, Jake. Next time you pass the esteemed Mr. Gibson in the corridor over there at headquarters, ask him how he feels about the Bush Doctrine, in light of the his flagging viewership. I’ve got a feeling (that goes right up my leg) that there’s going to be a realignment in more places than government after the election.

Posted by: jcarob | October 22, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Bhrandon,
Precisely the point.
Is it good to have a leader who is “like you” but may not be qualified? You don’t neccessarily have to have a person who is “like you”. An intelligent and thoughtful person who may not be completely like you but UNDERSTANDS YOU is good enough. And Obama wasn’t exactly born with a silver spoon in his mouth- McCain and Cindy were.
I am not begrudging them for being born into a well-off family, but they had better shut up about elitism because it is PLAIN HYPOCRITICAL.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Governor Sarah Palin is a fine woman. That seems to bother people who can’t find anything else to disparage her for. I suspect the Hollywood crowd would like her much better if she didn’t have a husband and a good family. Their therapists can’t make money off normal people.
How much are the Democrats paying to dress Michelle?

Posted by: len | October 22, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

I am just really soooo very sick of all the attention the press is giving this BUFFOON.

Posted by: Scott | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

len:
Answer: ZERO.
Because Michelle is paying with her own money. A check of the Dem’s expenditure turned up no such items.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

I am not suprised. I don’t like her policies but she always looks great. I said many timess the best thing about the Couric interview was the really nice redishh/pinkish blazer she was wearing.

Posted by: Ala | October 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

The RNC can do whatever they want to with the money that was donated to them,if they felt that they needed to buy things for the VP nominee it’s up to them. If you have a problem with that, you should have a problem with Obama giving ACORN 800,000 of the money that was donated to him, this is ridiculous. And on MSNBC this morning they had the nerve to say that if she is supposed to represent Hockey Moms, why is she not shopping at Wal-Mart, so what are they saying Hockey Moms can only shop at Walmart? I am a Soccer Mom, but I am also a professional, on the weekends I’ll wear my walmart sweats but during the week. I wear my professional gear which I spend good money for, because it’s my money that I earned and I can do what I want with it. You people are unbelievable talking about it’s the taxpayers money, it’s money donated to the RNC. You people are so ignorant, you should be as equally outraged that Obama wants to spread the wealth and take money from those who go out and bust their butts to succeed to support everyone else, why is that not a problem for you? The Media is disgusting, that’s why they are reporting that the major networks have lost most of their viewers, it will get worst after these elections.

Posted by: Kim | October 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

I can see Palin understands so much about working families, Americans and the ECONOMY!!
Or, is this about ‘Real Americans’ not all of us, but a few like her!!

Posted by: mar | October 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

to Maggie Crawford -you are greatly out of touch like the McPalins. Michelle Obama was not registered at the Waldorf … you should check your facts before you open your mouth! Also, Obama buys his families clothing… not the Democratic Party. Close your mouth …. your racist side is showing.

Posted by: lorene | October 22, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

That 150,000 for Mrs. High Heels is pork barrel spending at its very worst.
Let the McCain campaign explain it, Jake.

Posted by: gerardo | October 22, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Poor Sarah Palin, on November 5th she is going to be like Cinderella after midnight.

Posted by: DMR | October 22, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Why doesn’t the media mention that Obama spent $500,000 modifying his 757 airplane that costs thousands and thousands of dollars for just one flight. If you want to see someone who can spend money, look at Obama! He knows how to waste it faster than anyone!

Posted by: Jared | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Kim,
As I have said, yeah, the RNC can do what it likes with their money, but they should shut up about Obama being elitist. Michelle doesn’t wear 350 000 dollar outfits either.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

She will just go back to Alaska and use their money to pay off her debt.

Posted by: becky | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

The fact that the RNC bought her clothes isn’t the most telling part of the story—it’s where they shopped. Target or Wal-Mart would show that they are in touch with the common people. But Neiman Marcus and Saks? Spare us the :”Joe-the Plumber” routine. McCain-Palin are so far out of touch with the “Real America” its absurd.

Posted by: Rick | October 22, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Ben Smith at Politico reports:
One McCain aide asks of the spending on Sarah Palin’s wardrobe:
“Isn’t this the best $150,000 the RNC has spent the entire cycle?”
LOL
I assume they know by now that this race is totally lost. Obama is peaking today in the RCP average of national polls. He’s rewriting election history: there is NO tightening of the race, there’s a widening of the gap.

Posted by: greg | October 22, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Michelle:
Actually, if you’ve been paying attention, Obama’s wardrobe was covered in April (during the McCain’s $500 shoes newscycle, to add balance of course). Google “five suit” if you really are dying to run through this irrelevant nonsense again (five suits, four pairs of shoes, blah blah blah).
How does Palin’s or anyone’s clothes impact the facts of this race? I think Palin would be a disaster as a governmental leader based on her – gasp – her actual record, actions and unimpressive achievements as a governmental leader. Carping about her clothes budget only helps hide the real issues that matter.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

i would at the very least like someone in office who understands the job of that office
not someone who claims they know what the constitution says when it is so clearly obvious they do not
uh hmmm cough cough sarah palin
cheney tried this very same thing with trying to bend the rules of the VP job to fit what he wanted, he did indeed get a lot of power, but was shot down as a leader of the senate
palins lack of knowledge is just shocking
the vp is there to take over for a president shoudl they be incapacitated in some way
and to break a tie in the senate if one should occur
not run teh senate preside over the senate
make policy in the senate
the vp is not a senator
now that is outrageous

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Character is what you do when you think no one is watching!

Posted by: Charles Orsburn | October 22, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama gives ACORN $800,000 to support voter fraud and that does not make headlines. Guess George Soros gets what he pays for. The media and a president. Too bad it will cost America so much more.

Posted by: nookly23 | October 22, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

GOP should know this info would come out during a recession when their candidates are trying to convince us they care about ordinary people. Sarah would look fine in clothes from basic stores – the only reason they do this is to make HER feel better – like a bribe to BS the public. Palin supposedly has several (I read 7) pair of designer glasses (even before being chosen VP). This woman is vain and these facts will hurt the party more, but is good because it brings more truth to light. No wonder the GOP made such a big deal about the “lipstick on a pig” statement – she’s a fashion pig so it’s true. BOO! go back to Alaska. And other articles said she charged Alaska to send her kids with her on business trips – she/the GOP has no fiscal sense at all. No wonder the national debt has gone through the roof – and they seem to think they can pay the debt by printing more money. It’s past time to give these cornballs the boot.

Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

That’s just for starters. Wait till I get in the White House.

Posted by: Maverick Reformer | October 22, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

To make Cheney look like a real woman in drag is expensive.
It will easily cost a campaign a 150,000 bucks.

Posted by: kurt | October 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

jeff
a golden arrow?
so her lack of knowledge isnt a golden arrow
her lack of ability to hold any interview other than with people who support her
her inability to understand her role as vp and what a vp does and what the constitution is
troopergate
i mean… we dont have a golden arrow we have golden ARROWS
she is THE WORST VP CANDIDATE IN HISTORY

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The issue is important because it puts the lie to the whole “Republicans are for Joe Plumber” thing. Republicans are the party Of the Rich, By the Rich and For the Rich. Image is more important than substance (exhibit A: Sarah Palin).
The Republicans had to dress her up because, though the way she spoke appealed to the “common folk,” the way she dressed (I’ve seen the “before” photos) would have turned off the people with the real money.
Are any of you people actually LISTENING to McCain? He wants to give his tax breaks to the people at the top – businesses and the rich – so that it might “trickle down” to you. Same old stuff you’ve been falling for for years. Sheesh, wake up!

Posted by: juli | October 22, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Disgusting.
This woman is DISGUSTING.

Posted by: clifton | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

nookly
mccain was the key note speaker for acorn in 2006
he said of acorn in his speech that they are what makes america america
and acorn is not doing anything wrong here…
i would like to ask you how much did mccain spend on his associations with all the republican voter fraud going on?
or do you not want to address that because it destroys your argument?

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

By the way Jake, why don’t you check in to who paid for the big $400.00 meals that were ordered by Michelle Obama at the Waldorf? Let’s see who’s money went for that, was that on her charge card or was it charged to the room? who paid for the room? There were other nice Hotels in New York, why did they have to stay at the Waldorf. This could be a slippery slope Jake, if the media chooses to take it. They might want to leave this alone and start doing some real reporting, something they have failed to do for months.

Posted by: kim | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

The New York Post has retracted their story about the caviar lunch. Seems their “source” got it wrong. They are owned by Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox Noise. Remember Fox? The news channel you all say is so unbiased and tells the truth about Obama when the MSM won’t?
Here’s the retraction, read it for yourself:

Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

nookly23: “Obama gives ACORN $800,000 to support voter fraud and that does not make headlines.”
It made headlines, it was in a debate, it was heavily reported on, and the majority of intelligent Americans have made up their minds about it based on the actual facts. Little things, like it’s not voter fraud, ACORN flagged suspicious applications and were prohibited by law from not turning them in, they’ve been cooperative, etc. etc.
Pay a bit more attention to the news unless you’re deliberately trying to reinforce the Republican Party of Ignorance’s image as the direct intellectual heirs to President Bush.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

So, are these Palin’s REAL AMERICA clothes???
HA HAH HAH AHA HAHA HAHA HA HA HA HAHHA HHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Posted by: clifton | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida supporters suggested in a Web site message this week they would welcome a pre-election terror attack on the U.S. as a way to usher in a McCain presidency.
The message, posted Monday on the password-protected al-Hesbah Web site, said if al-Qaida wants to exhaust the United States militarily and economically, “impetuous” Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier,” the message said. “Then, al-Qaida will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush.”

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

And yet, the Empress still has no clothes.
No clothes never have been THIS expensive though.

Posted by: marnie | October 22, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Attention K-Mart shoppers: If you want people who make more than $250,000 a year to vote for you, you need $150,000 in clothing.

Posted by: hamishdad | October 22, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

This is so Old: “Here’s the retraction, read it for yourself:”
Kim, notice how Republicans are getting a reputation as bald faced liars just based on their nasty habit of lying, as you were just called out for? How unfair is that – it always used to work for them.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Hey jhw539 – Did you ever notice that every time republicans mention ACORN, McCain goes down in the polls?
Why?
Because no one believes your BS about ACORN.
Keep up the BS, and you’ll not only lose the presidential election, you’ll lose more and more seats in the Congress too.

Posted by: clifton | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

This woman is a JOKE and so FAKE!!! Real America doesn’t shop at Neimans or Saks. Heck, average America doesn’t shop there either. Give me a break, if this was the Obamas, this would be big news and all the republicans would start attacking him for being an Elitist!! Just one more title to throw at him to attack his character. She deserve the criticism she is receiving for all the negative, mud slinging she throws around!!

Posted by: nikkie | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

clifton
I think jhw was agreeing with you, unless you were directing it to the poster he was responding to.

Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Add the taxes on $150,000 of elitist clothes to the $21,200 that she owes to Alaska for faking her expense reports to cover luxury resorts for her children as just disclosed by the AP today.
HA HAHA HAHHHAHAH AHAH AHA HAAAAAAA!

Posted by: clifton | October 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

The typical GOP response even to buying Sarah’s cooperation with clothes is liberal, liberal, liberal, liberal, yada yada yada. The country is in a meltdown and they still can’t tell most of us are moderates – they “name call” anyone who doesn’t blindly belong to their “base”. Rove did a good job chopping the neo-con bumpkins from normal people who can consider real issues – good to see the MAJORITY OF SENSIBLE MODERATES are finally able to vote FOR someone instead of against the least of the evils.

Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Sorry jhw539 , I meant the republican who posted the ACORN BS, not you!

Posted by: clifton | October 22, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Palin, a former Miss, always dreamed of being a celebrity.
Understandably, when you’re from Wasilla, Alaska.
She finally has the clothing to fit that dream.
For less than two weeks to come.

Posted by: leontine | October 22, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

I bet the needed the clothes for the coming Troopergate hearings.
It can be helpful to seduce the investigators.

Posted by: anchorage | October 22, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Even the CNN interviewer admitted on camera that there is a double standard in the media reporting on Sarah Palin.
We’re beyond hypocrisy at this point. It has turned into a media bag job.

Posted by: len | October 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

This is so old-who paid for them to stay at the Waldorf, there are plenty of great reasonably priced hotels in New York? Who paid for them to stay there? Inoticed that you answered one question but not the other. If Sarah should shop at Walmart because she is for the little people, then Obama and Michelle should stay at the Holiday Inn since he is so concerned about the middle class. This is a slippery slope you people want to take it can go on and on.

Posted by: Kim | October 22, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Bhrandon: So are you saying the Repubs will let terrorists attack the US so McCain could win? If so, Rove has gone too far this time… Repubs sowing fear helped them in the past, but I think people will realize 9/11 happened on a Repub watch and it’s time to give them the boot regardless. Repubs have NOT done a good job protecting this country other than tightening the borders which Dems can do fine. The terrorists are blowing up their own countries now and their governments are finally doing something about it – we have no business trying to stop Muslims from killing themselves anymore than Muslim countries have business trying to stop the rift between neo-con dolts and normal moderates..

Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Midnight Nov 4, EST, all that fancy stuff will turn into rotten pumpkins anyway.

Posted by: rogerthomas | October 22, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Whatever Obama is wearing. .I’m sure he and wife Michelle have PAID for it themselves. However, Palin’s wardrobe is just the tip of the iceberg !!!!
GUILTY of ethics violations in Alaska; using State funds for Travel for spouse and Children; doesn’t KNOW much about the VP job or anything else; Lies about EVERYTHING !!!! We have had to live with an Administration, where this kind of behavior would be expected. . .and praised. . .but the big disappointment is McCain himself. .allowing his judgement and honor to be smeared by his campaign handlers. . . .he was NEVER a part of these kind of tactics, but in order to WIN this election, he has reduced himself to this !!! Very unfortunate, because it appears he may NOT win, and he will be tarnished by his last major campaign. . .SLEAZE at every level. Picking Palin has been a NET NEGATIVE. . she’s NOT QUALIFIED, and buying clothes. .well, so what at this point !!! The RNC doesn’t care that regular Joe-the-plumber guys, who work hard everyday and DONATE to the RNC, now have to see their hard-earned $$$$ go for designer clothes !!! This is tragic. Win at all costs. During this economic down-turn for so many, McCain, 7 homes; 13 cars. . only has himself to blame for what’s happening!!
But I suspect, he and Barbie doll Cindy, don’t give a damn !!!!

Posted by: BJ | October 22, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

I read somewhere that Cindy McCain called Sarah Palin–Trailor Trash Redneck–maybe that is why the Republican Campaign had to outfit her for $150,000–to try keeping up with Cindy’s $300,000 outfits!!! Reading an article in Good Housekeeping on Cindy McCain–worrying about putting gas in her car–feeding her family–making sure she keeps a roof over their heads-saying these things are very difficult for her!!!! Give me a break! Cindy alone lists – what- making 4-6 million dollars last year??? Difficult to make ends meet??? Read the two articles on Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama, people and see the difference!! I am a white 67 year old woman who recently retired from the Banking industry and have voted early for Obama/Biden–who are thinking of our needs–how can anyone in their right minds even consider voting for John McCain, who is too old and has lied repeadly and Sarah Palin, what can I say? she is so out of her league that it isn’t even funny, anymore!! Alaska needs to look into this Governor and checkout what has been going on in her administration! Obama/Biden–the only way to vote!!

Posted by: lola | October 22, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Jake, yes she will have to deal with this issue. I am not sure if there are loopholes or not. Seems like Sarah has a few problems going on – (1)recent
findings – abuse of power as Governor of Alaska & is still under investigation – law suits will be filed in Alaska (2)Needs to deal with travel expenses in Alaska — taking family along – doctored books after the fact (3)Some questions up Alaska also exist how they got a new house built at same time a sports complex was being built in Wasilla at same time?? Their house is 1-2 blocks away. Complex contractor had lien on their property??? People question whether they got free building materials from sports complex?? This was a family of six with no high income that built new huge house??? Did they use taxpayers money. Seems Republican Senator Ted Stevens under FBI indictment did??? Sarah too???
Sarah is sure not my choice. Wish she would just go home. Her whole political history in Alaska revealed a wolf in sheeps clothing. She is a smart, but very vindictive lady who sets out on vendetta to get people she turns on. She turns on them with a venegance, and destroys. Go research her history if you can still find all the information.
Sarah uses the system. And she will say why not!! Claims he cleaned up corruption! No – was FBI who was already there in Alaska. 11 Repuublicans indicted – 0 Democrats.
Think Sarah was trained by by Senator Ted Stevens!!! With him on trial, her long standing friendship with him, is she going to be next indicted by FBI? Or will all the law suits that will be filed against her and Alaska re: Troopergate, and the now present ethics board legal privately hired attorney presenting occurring be her downfall in Alaska? Then we look at the fact the Ethics Board there is appointed by her??? Are they biased?? Their jobs depend upon supporting her. She and Todd are giving testimony this Friday. Their attorneys have the story all changed and memorized? Sarah is guilty as can be for abuse of power. She did pressure to have brother inlaw Trooper Wooten fired. If Wooten is a problem, it needed to be dealt with legally in courts. But Palin’s had already lost in court. Judge had forewarned them to stop. Todd and Sarah revealed how dishonest they were at dealing with Trooper Wooten. Used Sarah’s position and access to info, heads of government to pursue illegally. I could have gotten it done legally correct.
This lady who I was once excited about, proved to be a scary dishonest lady!! Found she lies all the time.

Posted by: Sharonklim | October 22, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

DNC spent $ 10 Million on styrofoam support columns for his innaugural speech. You can’t even donate them to charity; what a waste. So $150,000 for clothes purchased by the RNC’s donated funding is another gimme-a-break Political liberal media stunt.

Posted by: Ann | October 22, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Interesting facts about Palin: She bills the state of Alaska for sleeping in her own home, she bills everybody everywhere for shlepping her kids with her, and now she bills the RNC for her family’s clothes. Doesn’t all this bring her into the crosshairs of the Republican rage against welfare queens?

Posted by: Achshav | October 22, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

People need to wake up. Obama is not talking about taking Joe the Plumbers money and giving it to people without jobs. That is ridiculous and untrue. He is talking about Mega rich people who are raking in obscene profits while paying their workers minimum wage. If they complain too loud about the low wages, they look for workers in India or China to do the work so they can make even higher profit.
Think about the Walmart hiers making billions a year while their workers can’t pay rent. Think about mortgage and finance CEO’s with paychecks of 487 million over three years while they rape homeowners. Think about Oil execs making 500 billion a year in profit while they bleed America dry.
Wake up people. These mega rich 1-5% don’t let ANYTHING trickle down. They rape the American worker for everything they can and they DON’T PAY TAXES! They write off losses, find every loophole and then have folks like McCain subsidize them. AND YES … paying taxes is patriotic!! It is how we fund America. The problem is that the middle class carries the burden while the mega-rich carry off the rewards.

Posted by: DaveinColorado | October 22, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

It appears the Palin’s feel the tax payers dollars are there for their own personal use! No wonder she doesnt want to spread the wealth..hoard it all for yourself!! If they won the election,I
cant imagine how much it would cost the taxpayers to keep both her and Cindy in the luxurious lifestyle they so aspire to!!

Posted by: Dee | October 22, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Kim: it will be interesting to see how Palin is received back in Alaska after the Repubs lose this election. There have been this “Miss Prissy Moose Hunter” clothing story, the AP story about Alaska paying to send her kids on the road with her, Troopergate (still guilty of ethics violations, yet she deludes she was cleared), and fellow Repub Ted “Sucking off the Nations Teat” Stevens is on the ropes (the jury is out). Alaska is not a “real fiscal state” anyway – they have more government subsidy than anywhere else, but that has been helped with oil revenues (which will be dropping now that oil price gouging is coming back down after taking it’s toll). There are few stories about opinions of her in Alaska, but as some have said, I don’t think she’ll be as well received – she was better off when they thought she had them thinking she was a typical hockey mom.

Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Karma is a Hindu concept. I think Democrats should not be harsh towards Sarah Palin, lest they be reincarnated as Republicans.

Posted by: hamishdad | October 22, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

HP BOSTON SAYS WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO TO STOP THE MADNESS?
ANSWER- We are gonna make Barack Obama President!

Posted by: Angie | October 22, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Kim
If you actually read the retraction you will know that Michelle Obama wasn’t there at all. But here, I’ll just cut and paste the entire entry from the NYP
“THE source who told us last week about Michelle Obama getting lobster and caviar delivered to her room at the Waldorf-Astoria must have been under the influence of a mind-altering drug. She was not even staying at the Waldorf. We regret the mistake, and our former source is going to regret it, too. Bread and water would be too good for such disinformation.”
It’s a short piece, but that is the entirety.
All of the candidates HAVE to stay at upscale hotels because the security is better. I have no argument with that. It is for their safety.
And I never said Palin had to shop at Walmart, in fact, I’ve not made any statement about this shopping trip at all one way or the other. Don’t really care where the shopping is done as long as all the payment/tax issues are handled appropriately. That goes for both sides.

Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Some reformer. Being a candidate brings a $150,000 shopping spree while most Americans are struggling before the winter heating season even begins?
While I can see how a young mother should be able to bring her family on trips she made as Gov, I don’t see how anyone could sign of on a 5 day hotel bill for a 5 hour meeting in NYC.
Last, on the clothing report, I can see how clothes could eventually (in theory) be donated to charity, but how would one ever return the 5,000 in hair/makeup?

Posted by: christine daly | October 22, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This is a story? You are worried about Sarah Palin getting a new wardrobe to campaign in and no one says anything about Joe Biden only giving $369 a year to charity. Vice President is someone we will depend on to help Americans and he only manages to give $369 a year out of his own pocket.

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

i also find palin and mccain to be bigger creeps than the obamas or bidens

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 22, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Who pays for all of Joe Biden’s famous Amtrak trips? Just curious.

Posted by: Michelle | October 22, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

she’s off on an official visit to Sen Stevens for a date in court. Love the Republican trickle down economy thinking. We waste 150,000 dollars on threads and hair and then trash them into a recycling bin for the underprivileged…. duh– anybody get the economics of that? At least McCain gets dressed by his wife, but Palin really has no sense of shameless spending or sphoning of funding. She’s really building a fast pipeline to Alaska. So much for executive oversight and responsibility– so long as somebody else pays, she can overlook the expenses.

Posted by: pogo | October 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I’m also curious…are these blogs part of ABC’s attempt to “raise the public discourse” about politics?
If so…does anyone think they are succeeding?

Posted by: Michelle | October 22, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Bhrandon
You may want to get your facts straight before you post. Palin did NOT cut special needs funding, or Special Olympics funding, that too was a lie by the liberal press. In fact, she raised funding.
Perhaps if those voting for Obama would read more than their favorite liberal blogs they would know the truth.
The TRUTH is not Obama.

Posted by: Brenda | October 22, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

If Sarah couldn’t stand such scutiny, then McCain SHOULDA NEVER SLECTED HER AS RUNNING MATE!!!
It’s called vetting, people.
President Pro Tem of the Senate doesn’t mean you’re in charge SARAH DUMBSHYT PALIN!
And, JOE THE PLUMBER has only McCain to thank as well for his new found fame and public scutiny.

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I know I refuse to work in anything that costs less than 10,000$.
Sarah is just like me!

Posted by: Joe the Janitor | October 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I’m a tax lawyer. These clothes aren’t gifts. They are compensation. If the RNC takes them back, that is a different story and a coverup I might add.
Palin is monstrously corrupt. The abuse of the clothing allowance (Piper is photographed with a Vuitton bag people!), the abuse of the State of Alaska expense account to pay for non-reimbursable expenses, the abuse of the per diem rule…
I also have very little doubt that we will find that her $500,000 house that Todd built with his “friends” was actually an illegal kickback from the Wasilla hockey rink deal.
Mark my words.

Posted by: Mary | October 22, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Brenda: Amen!!!!

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

This is such a non-story. Jake, don’t you feel a little catty reporting it? How much did Obama spend on his suits? $6,000 each? Grecian columns? Logos? What does Michelle Obama pay for her Maria Pinto designer dresses? $5,000 per gown? Who cares…
What is important is keeping our American work ethic and not sliding any closer to Socialism. That, and really contemplating an untested, inexperienced presidential candidate with an erratic and gaffe prone VP… Yikes!

Posted by: Fallon | October 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Mary,
Not just the tax implication, what about the legality of using campaign funds for clothing??
See 2 USC 439b(2)(B)
(a) Permitted uses
A contribution accepted by a candidate, and any other donation received by an individual as support for activities of the individual as a holder of Federal office, may be used by the candidate or individual–
(1) for otherwise authorized expenditures in connection with the campaign for Federal office of the candidate or individual;
(2) for ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in connection with duties of the individual as a holder of Federal office;
(3) for contributions to an organization described in section 170 (c) of title26;
(4) for transfers, without limitation, to a national, State, or local committee of a political party;
(5) for donations to State and local candidates subject to the provisions of State law; or
(6) for any other lawful purpose unless prohibited by subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Prohibited use
(1) In general
A contribution or donation described in subsection (a) of this section shall not be converted by any person to personal use.
(2) Conversion
For the purposes of paragraph (1), a contribution or donation shall be considered to be converted to personal use if the contribution or amount is used to fulfill any commitment, obligation, or expense of a person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign or individual’s duties as a holder of Federal office, including–
(A) a home mortgage, rent, or utility payment;
(B) a clothing purchase;
(C) a noncampaign-related automobile expense;
(D) a country club membership;
(E) a vacation or other noncampaign-related trip;
(F) a household food item;
(G) a tuition payment;
(H) admission to a sporting event, concert, theater, or other form of entertainment not associated with an election campaign; and
(I) dues, fees, and other payments to a health club or recreational facility.

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

This is the Republican way…… Spread the wealth among themselves and occasionally donate to the Salvation Army asa gesture of goowill. Joe the Plumber must feel good right about now. He was wearing a nice suit for his interview on Fox. I wonder if the McCain campaign bought that for him. Please let’s not criticize this woman for loving to shop for fear of being accused of sexism. It’s really not Palin’s fault. The Republicans have been screwing this country long before she came along. Is her spending spree the opposite of socialism which some people may have to give up during an Obama Presidency ?

Posted by: Ron | October 22, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

to Michelle on what the Obamas spent on clothes: It’s not what they spend but who they ask to pay for it. I guarantee you the Obamas spent their own money on their own clothes and didn’t tap their campaign coffers. (Because it is unethical, but it also means they can write the cost of the wardrobe off instead of pay taxes on it) The RNC is using your donations to buy clothes for Caribou Barbie. Wake up and come to the light side.

Posted by: HoldenLitgo | October 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Is anyone going to comment on how Obama’s campaign is charging reporters for access to his coronation in Grant Park?
Or are we continuing with clothing? How about some substance, people? And I can only echo the question about Obama’s suits. I have read previously he refuses to disclose any info — the implication being he doesn’t want to be whacked for this very thing.

Posted by: beth | October 22, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

“I’m also curious…are these blogs part of ABC’s attempt to “raise the public discourse” about politics? If so…does anyone think they are succeeding?”
They serve as a testing ground for talking points. All sides are using them and the media can watch these to determine when a story is gaining traction. They are much cheaper than focus groups if not as scientific.
Are they succeeding? I think they have become part of the rage machine. The MSM has a lot to answer for when the election is over. Has anyone noticed that O’Reilly’s numbers are going through the roof as the viewership for the network news is declining?
To get anything resembling the truth, I have to watch all of the networks, the cable news, and sort accordingly. Even there, the different programs particularly on cable have been all over the map with the emphasis of their stories.
One part of the degeneration of the media news is the problem of having news as a profit center and another is the voracious 24X7X365 news cycle that trivializes even major stories. The last and most telling is the fact that the talking heads have become celebrities in their own right and like civil servants, outlast administrations. They have adopted advocacy journalism, a degenerate practice, in the belief they have the right to influence the election based on their superior access.
Is it succeeding? It depends on whose success you are measuring.

Posted by: len | October 22, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Beth,
Here’s some substance for you:
Mr. Obama’s favorability is the highest for a presidential candidate running for a first term in the last 28 years of Times/CBS polls. Mrs. Palin’s negative rating is the highest for a vice-presidential candidate as measured by The Times and CBS News. Even Dan Quayle, with whom Mrs. Palin is often compared because of her age and inexperience on the national scene, was not viewed as negatively in the 1988 campaign.

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

I have contributed to this campaign and I don’t mind at all that Sarah Palin buy clothes with it. Spend Baby Spend! However I do take issue that my tax dollars are being given to Obama’s ACORN.

Posted by: maria | October 22, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

maria, maria, maria, tsk, tsk.
It’s illegal to buy Palin clothes with your political campaign contribution!

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Jake, could you look into Palin’s stand on the importance of education?
How has Palin brought up her own kids?
Her eldest son is a high-school drop-out. Her eldest daughter has had, so far as one can tell from press reports, very uneven attendance in high school, and no plans for college.
Her other daughters seem to spend a lot of time traveling the country with their mom at tax-payers’ expense. I’ve seen them at several rallies with the Palins this fall. Are they not in school? And why not?
It amazes me that so little attention has been paid to this subject.

Posted by: kiwi | October 22, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Jake, You need to ask Ted Stevens how his “gifts were just loans” is working out for him. I find it interesting that nobody is talking about McCain’s $8600 a month make-up artist. Gee, no wonder why we can’t find the McCain from 2000.

Posted by: JL | October 22, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

hmmm, I wonder if the taxpayers money pay for Bidens trips back and forth on Amtrak everyday. If we are going to go down this slippery slope, let’s do it. I pay for may own commute back and fort each day, so I would like to know if my money is paying for him to go back and fort from DC Everyday, this could get ugly if this is the direction that you want to go in Jake and the rest of the MSM. It could get really ugly, let’s start following all of the money trais don’t we!!

Posted by: K im | October 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

It would be interesting to learn how much money SNL spent on dressing Tina Fey to look exactly the same.

Posted by: Sue T123 | October 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

“Is anyone going to comment on how Obama’s campaign is charging reporters for access to his coronation in Grant Park?”
It is shameful but predictable. Pelosi’s Amazing Money Machine has proven that the DNC can buy elections. Since they need a supermajority to keep Obama from being a first term lame duck, they are using any and every means to fill their bank accounts for the midterms.
Obama’s campaign is the single largest grab for domination of power in America in history. Our republic is on very dangerous ground with his campaign regardless of the merits or demerits of the candidate. Precedents are being set that should not be.
I thought Bush was bad. Bush was just dumb. Obama’s campaign is smart and very scary.

Posted by: len | October 22, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

I marvel to read that some People think that these shameful superfluous extravagance expenditures are not necessary to be brought to public knowledge.
If She can spend that much on dressing in less than two months, how much would she have spent out of Tax-payers contribution to the RNC’s coffers if she had been on the Campaign trail for a year?
People tend to pretend oblivion to the fact that Campaign monies are contributions from Americans. The monies are hard earned.
But in a show of support and goodwill, they have willingly contributed these funds to the Campaigns. For RNC and McCain Campaign to misuse these funds is the height of irresponsibility and fiscal indiscipline.
It is a microcosm of the use Tax payers monies would be put to if they are elected to Office.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | October 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Okay about $5,000 from the NRC was spent on Palin’s hair & makeup..Does that go back to the NRC too with the clothes?? And the NRC claims that this $150,000 in clothes belong to them & not Palin & her family. (Clever tax evasion scam on the part of the Republican party.)
And Sarah…who in your “REAL America” earns $150,000 a year, let alone spends that in 1-2 months in clothing?? You really are out of touch with the Real American middle class!!

Posted by: Christine | October 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

She should’ve said, “THANKS BUT NO THANKS to those clothes to nowhere!!”

Posted by: ES | October 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Repeat after me:
It’s ILLRGAL to buy personal clothing with campaign funds.
It’s ILLRGAL to buy personal clothing with campaign funds.
It’s ILLRGAL to buy personal clothing with campaign funds.
It’s ILLRGAL …..

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

This type of reporting is totally without substance or merit. Of course the GOP is going to spend money making her look good in front of the entire country. The bill might be high, but in the general context of the campaign it is insignificant. It simply shows that women’s clothes are more expensive than men’s. Making an irrelevant fact like this into a headline is shameful. That being said, I personally think that Sarah Palin is completely unqualified to hold any public office. My opinion, however, was derived from hearing her incoherent, hyper-zealous, partisan babble rather than looking at her wardrobe expenditures.

Posted by: johnishere | October 22, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Its amazing that she claims to be a reformer. We now know she billed Alaska taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars for nights she stayed in her house, tens of thousands of dollars for her kids travel expenses, and Republican contributors $150,000 for clothes for herself and her family. I’d be seriously bitter if the candidate I had given money to spent it on clothes for his family, I can’t believe people are still buying into the Palin story.

Posted by: billthomson | October 22, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

This is just more of the same media bashing Palin. When the far left wore t-shirts with explicit remarks about Palin and when SNL said her daughter’s baby was the result of incest – no one in the media stood up and said that is too far.
Obama is going to win. Why keep bashing her? Even Powell, the statesman who tried to cover up the massacre of Vietnamese women and children, had to bash her.
The democratic machine has coarsened society.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Check this from the new WSJ/NBC poll: Sarah Palin is viewed more unfavorably than favorably by voters!!!
Here fave/unfave: 38%-47%
That is a VERY tough place to be as a national candidate and is a reminder of just how much her public image has been bruised by her performance with Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric, and the subsequent spoofing by Tina Fey.

Posted by: johnson | October 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

With the enormous challenges we face in this election, all we are worried about is clothes won by presidential candidates. Do we know where all the 600 mil Obama has raised coming from. Who in the media has done their due dilligence to investigate this? I am so disgusted!

Posted by: Eric | October 22, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Barney Franks has an affair with the guy in Fannie Mae hs is supposed to be overseeing and the media does a pass on it.
Listen we know the voting machines have already been stuffed. The bogus registration will cover any tampering that has gone with voting machines – and that was not even required becuase of the spectacular pander to 95% of America – bought off for a onl $500 per vote.
Now we are in for Pelosi, Reid, Barney Franks, Chuck Schumer, light headed Joe Biden, and Barack (he is not my pastor or my friend) Obama.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Ah, I love the way all you wingnuts are squealing like stuck pigs. Ha, ha, ha! Not easy to say you’re for Joe Sixpack when you want bigger tax cuts for the wealthy and you go on 75,000-dollar clothes-shopping sprees, is it?
Looooooosers!!!

Posted by: expatjourno | October 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

I’d like to know how much Obama has spent on his, Michelle’s and their kids clothes and accessories. Why is buying clothes a big deal, but spending over $450,000 on food for your campaign isn’t?
Considering that Palin’s tax reocrds show she falls into the middle class tax bracket, she obviously could not afford the kind of clothes it takes when you are running for VP and attending the events that require formal wear.
Get a life people, there is no story here.
Let’s talk about the real issues, like how Obama wants to take this country into the Marxist/Socialist direction and how Pelosi’s puppet has terrorist and criminal friends and how he sat in a Black liberation theology racist anti-american church for 20 yrs and his past cocaine and alcohol abuse.
Or how about how the media is running the election this year and the stupid American people are falling for it.
I seriously hope that if Obama is called the winner, that someone will suddenly jump out and say “You’ve been punk’d!”

Posted by: S Adams | October 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

“This type of reporting is totally without substance or merit. Of course the GOP is going to spend money making her look good in front of the entire country. The bill might be high, but in the general context of the campaign it is insignificant”
People are losing their homes while the Republicans spend $150K to dress up Caribou Barbie.
This could be the nail in the coffin for the McCain campaign.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

a fashion wardrobe for the real celebrity
‘SARAH THE SHOPPER’

Posted by: watching | October 22, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Palin’s utter incompetency is the issue here, not the extent to which the RNC felt it appropriate to use fundraising monies to make that sow’s ear into a silk purse. But really? 150K in a month is a staggering, amount of spending, even on top end designer clothes. It defines conspicuous consumption, and is beyond hypocritical when used to doll up a candidate running on her homegrown, Wal-Mart mom roots. Even assuming an outfit cost of 3-4K (before accessories, shoes, etc.), it’s clear they didn’t buy her a wardrobe–they bought enough to fill a store. Donations of that stuff could run a charity for a year…and you know that idea didn’t come up until this news did. Obama, Biden, even McCain (who can well afford it) buy their own clothes (other than some haircuts, financial reports confirm the DNC hasn’t spent a dime on O/B’s look), but the stagecraft needed to make Palin look even marginally credible is just a tangible representation of her ticket–all style, no substance.

Posted by: Sharon | October 22, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

johnson (aka Einstein) wonders if Obama, Biden, and their wives will be investigated with the same vigor.
If Einstein had taken the time to read the investigative report on Politico, he would have read the words “an investigation of the Obama/Biden campaign failed to turn up any kind of similar expenditures.”
Next.

Posted by: Paris Sailin | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

so…
Michelle Obama snacked on caviar, lobster and champagne @ 4pm at the Waldorf while hubby was at a meeting…

Posted by: aw | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Check this from the new WSJ/NBC poll: Sarah Palin is viewed more unfavorably than favorably by voters!!!
Here fave/unfave: 38%-47%
That is a VERY tough place to be as a national candidate and is a reminder of just how much her public image has been bruised by her performance with Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric, and the subsequent spoofing by Tina Fey.
Posted by: johnson | Oct 22, 2008 11:54:31 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Talking points from NBC-National Barack Channel, that is doing extremely poorly in ratings since it has been in the pocket for Obama and is skewing the facts to the American people. Obviously we have caught on, since NBC and Couric has the lowest ratings of any news program.
Funny how Palin is drawing large crowds everywhere she goes and her appearance on SNL drew the largest ratings in 15 yrs.
I do not believe the leftwing nutjob polls. Who was polled? Where were they polled? What was asked? When was the polling done? You can’t just throw numbers out and expect people to fall for it.

Posted by: S Adams | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Does anyone really think she’s going to return her clothes? or the fancy handbags for her teenage daughters? At least the Obamas as highly educated lawyers, have made their own money and have a right to enjoy it. But Palin and her husband, whose combined IQ probably doesn’t even add up to 200; get to enjoy a lavish lifestyle courtesy of the dumb people who donated to her campaign? Biden pays the daily train trips to DE with is own money, and owns 1 house. Obama 1 house and 1 car. McCain owns 7 houses and 11 cars.

Posted by: Elsa_in_MD | October 22, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

so…
Michelle Obama snacked on caviar, lobster and champagne @ 4pm at the Waldorf while hubby was at a meeting…
Posted by: aw | Oct 22, 2008 12:09:22 PM
+++++++++++++++
Don’t forget, it was IRANIAN caviar and the bill was $450.00! Unless she regurgated that food and ate it again I call that a waste of money.
Meanwhile, in a far off land called Kenya, Michelle’s in-laws are living on $1 month in 6 x 9 huts.
Absolutely shameful!

Posted by: S Adams | October 22, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Sorry, johnson,
I misread the attribution of the post I was responding to, and accidentally insulted you. Very sorry, my mistake.
I meant to insult “Concerned in OH.”

Posted by: Paris Sailin | October 22, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

This story on fashion is to cover the fact that Joe Biden is counting on a disaster if Obama gets elected. There is no “if” about it. The election is done and Obama has won.
And we have Biden hoping for something juicy like maybe a thermal nuclear attack in a suitcase bomb. We are arguing about standard campaign expense of putting clothes on the candidate. I am more worried about New York turning to glass myself.
If we asked for the Obama family clothing expense we would be called racist. The women haters can say what they want about Palin because they know the media will back them up.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

so…
Michelle Obama snacked on caviar, lobster and champagne @ 4pm at the Waldorf while hubby was at a meeting…
Posted by: aw
********************************************
Remember the research they did years ago with 7 year old children. The adult whispered something in the first childs ear and asked them to repeat it, going all the way down the line.
When the final child was asked to say outloud what he had been told by the previous child, it was totally distorted with little reality to what the original statement had been.
When you take your information from 2nd, 3rd and 4th sources, you risk sounding as silly as that 7 year old child who didn’t have a clue and only ‘knew’ what the child before him had said.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 22, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Jake- doesn’t ABC have a wardrobe department? It would be a similar deal. The people wearing the clothes don’t own them, even if they are purchased for them to wear for a specific event.

Posted by: MayBee | October 22, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Here’s the real waste of money from campaign funds: $832,000 paid to ACORN for people to sit around and write out make believe voter registration cards.
I wonder if Obama is going to pay for representation and bail for all those ACORN voters who are being indicted?

Posted by: S Adams | October 22, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Can we assume, Jake, that you are similarly looking into what the Obamas have spent on their clothing during their 20 months on the campaign trail?
That is a whole lot of fancy clothes!
Posted by: Michelle | Oct 22
*******************************************
Politico who reported this story said they were unable to find similar expenses while looking through the Obama campaign expenses.
Doesn’t mean they didn’t purchase any new clothes, but that they weren’t using campaign funds to do it.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 22, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

WSJ retracted the lobster and caviar story but of course, once the masters of wingnut universe espouse something, the mindless minions must repeat it incessantly.
RL, I tried to blast myself directly after posting ILLRGAL but the site censored me cause I used the word “Dummy”

Posted by: Bob | October 22, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

$150,000 to try to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear? That’s more than our house cost!
Palin should pay for her own clothes. Maybe she’s too busy charging the State of Alaska for dragging her brats all over to conduct “state business.” Will somebody please tell me what “state business” can be conducted by a 7-year-old?
Next she’ll be charging the taxpayers for Trig pooping in his diapers. I suppose that’s some kind of “business.”
What a tool this woman is…and so is anybody who makes excuses for her.

Posted by: slavicdiva | October 22, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

“Don’t forget, it was IRANIAN caviar and the bill was $450.00! Unless she regurgated that food and ate it again I call that a waste of money.”
S Adams
Page 6 had to retract that story after they found out Michelle wasn’t even at that hotel.
Now that you know it never happened.
Repeating this story from now on would confirm that you are yet another right wing liar.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

I work for a county Democratic party and I’ve had a steady stream of Republicans come into our office to get voter registration forms to switch parties. This hasn’t slowed down since the deadline for registrations came and went, these folks don’t want to be associated with the RCP anymore, regardless. Their reasons range from the money they’ve lost in the last few months to the pick and promotion of the clearly unqualified Palin, to the aimless wave of mud that has become the Republican campaign. This story just reinforces the sense that the Republican Party is clueless.

Posted by: rhyzome | October 22, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

another thing about palin’s kids
ever notice how you never see any of the Obama kids at his rallies?
you know why?
THEY’RE IN SCHOOL!!!! WHERE THEY SHOULD BE!!!!
But I guess Palin thinks using them as props for her campaign is more important than their education.

Posted by: David Varet | October 22, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

That’s a good point.
Are the Palin children homeschooled?
Because they seem to be everywhere Palin goes.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

“John McCain paid $175,000 of campaign money to a Republican operative accused of massive voter registration fraud in several states, it has emerged”
Ruh roh!

Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

How much money did Obama waste on the negative ADs?
No matter how michelle Obama makes up, she is still not as pretty as Palin.
So, she is jealous.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | October 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Where is the decency? Now, you are attacking the Palin children again? I fear for this country…

Posted by: Jane the Plumber | October 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I love when Palin supporters try to protect her from attacks – she goes in a blink from a pitbull to a victim of sexism
all this woman does is lob attacks – remember her speech at the convention? out of nowhere she popped up and lobbed attack after attack
you all complain about how Obama declares every attack against him as racist – but then you ahead and declare every attack against palin as sexist

Posted by: David Varet | October 22, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Does everyone here know that you don’t have to pay any sales taxes on clothes purchased in Minnesota?

Posted by: Blake Hegerle | October 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

“Biden pays the daily train trips to DE with is own money, and owns 1 house. … McCain owns 7 houses and 11 cars”
Biden supports every federal budget expenditure for AMTRAK ($1.2 billion annual for a group that can’t run a profitable monopoly), AND gets reimbursed for much of his daily travel.
McCain’s 11 cars also cover 5 kids of driving age, and staff in Arizona. More than “regular Joe” but does that really disqualify him from being president?
As for 7 houses — check out which ones are investment/rental properties, which ones are for his kids, and which ones he lives in.

Posted by: DLK | October 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Jane the Plumber – I agree the people are attacking the Palin’s with a ferocity. Akmadinijad says he is going to wipe out Israel and we say we will meet with him. Palin gets an outfit and people go crazy.
Understandable, because the democrats love a good terrorist, but absolutely despise a hockey mom.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

How, exactly, is a legitimate question about how Gov. Palin’s school-age children are able to spend so much time with her on the campaign trail an “attack”? Or are they on “official business” for the McCain campaign?
This woman is going to go down as one of the biggest frauds in U.S. political history.

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

No – I am not attacking the children – i am attacking Sarah Palin’s judgment
kinda like you guys say about the ayers thing
besides – all you paliniacs do is support her for all the reasons you hate obama
- Obama is such a celebrity, all he does is speak to large crowds
- Sarah Palin is so great. look at the huge crowds she gets!
- Obama’s wife is so unpatriotic! She isn’t even proud of America
- What does it matter that Todd Palin was a successionist?
- Obama had a crazy pastor he sought advice from
- Who cares that Sarah Palin sought the prayers and touch of a witch doctor who had terrorized tons of women in africa

Posted by: David Varet | October 22, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

today – I think your point would be taken more seriously if you could spell “Ahmadinejad” correctly.

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Aren’t Sarah Palin’s kids meant to be in school? Don’t they have schools in Alaska?

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Now we are back on McCain’s 7 houses – investments and family dwellings. Being rich is not a crime – or it was not. Why are we thrilled to asscoiate with terrorists than we hate people whose families work hard and succeeded? Calling that socialist would be an understatement.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

golfgirlusa,
I would question if Palin is prettier to begin with.
But nevertheless, no matter how much she crams, Palin will never be smarter then Ivy-League Michelle. Oh dear, I must be an elitist!
This woman is just so unknowledgeable about foreign policy, whatever university she went to.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Don’t forget the “gotcha” questions the media throws at the poor woman, like “Can you tell us some Supreme Court decisions you disagree with?” and “What newspapers and magazines do you read to keep up with current events?”
“Gotcha”?

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Buying 150K worth of clothes and loaning them to the VP candidate…Is this what they call Wingnut Welfare?

Posted by: Wingnut Welfare | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

today,
No one is begrudging rich people. Cindy and John were born into wealth. Well, if they can’t help it, fine.
But they have no business calling Obama elitist when he came from a modest family background.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Al – today – I think your point would be taken more seriously if you could spell “Ahmadinejad” correctly.”
Yes, really important to get the lunatics named spelled correctly. Good way to advance the discussion.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Do you think Joe the Plumber shops at the same stores that Sarah got her clothes from? I mean, if “Joe the Plumber” is now the paradigm for “real American values” according to the good Governor, what does that say about her choice to shop at some, well, “elite” stores?

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Ah … the impossibility of national politics for women.
Act I – use your own (and hubby’s) money to buy travel appropriate clothing, get beat up for being fashion clueless (and showing thunder thighs). Act II – Show up in your regular clothes, get called on the carpet for looking like a moosehunter or a subarban mom dressing for a funeral. Have your political committee buy clothes for you, have the media beat the drums (while expressing disdain for campaigns that support negative advertising and detract from the real issues of the day).
Guess she could have chosen Option 3 – Buy enough appropriate clothes to appear in national media 16×7, go broke.

Posted by: KEN | October 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Golfgirlusa -
you do realize how your comment about michelle obama manifested how insecure and shallow you are?
So – looks are all that matters to you? So, because someone is better looking than me, I am necessarily jealous of them?
Considering that Michelle Obama is more educated, smarter, has raised her children better, has more professional success than Palin and actually will get to live in the white house…well, I would think that Palin would be the jealous one.
But hey, in your world, looks are all that matters

Posted by: David Varet | October 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

CAN SOMEONE HELP ME OUT.
Is it legal for Candidates to use campaign funds for clothing?
If it had been Michelle Obama, I wonder how big-mouth Rush Limbaugh would have gone to town with it.
A whooping 150K on clothes for less that two months?
That gives an average of $75k per month.
If she had been on the Campaign trail for one year She would have spent $900K on Clothes.
I wonder if She would put the Clothes on e-bay?
No matter how her fans try to spin it, Real Americans and pro-Americans to embark on senseless spending.
Why couldn’t she use the Clothes She uses as Governor of Alaska.
I wont be surprised if it comes out tomorrow that She billed the Alaskan Tax payers for how Clothes as Governor.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | October 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Grey Matter says “But they have no business calling Obama elitist when he came from a modest family background.”
Being an elitist does not require your family to have ever worked hard and succeeded. Being an elitist only requires one to think that they are some how better than others.
Unfortunately we have the tapes of Obama berating the people of Pennsylvania with of elitists in San Francisco.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Does anyone else find it hilarious that Republicans and their talk-radio mouthpieces are now endlessly decrying their status as “victims” (particularly of the “mainstream media”) after YEARS of insulting gays, African Americans, etc. for a “cult of victimization”? Isn’t that ironic beyond belief?

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

I don’t understand Obama’s continuous push for money. Every single day I get an email to contribute. Yesterday it was donate $10 for a car magnet-limited time only-the deadline is looming! They want to put it ‘where it’s needed the most!’ So is he going to take all his extra cash and give it to the poor after the election? They’re going to need it because they are still going to be poor. How about putting his money where his mouth is and “Spread the wealth.” He could start with his old district in Chicago. It’s just as he left it. Poverty stricken, rat infested and unheated.
Oh, yeah…A million dollars was put into the campaign fund to try and defeat the woman who went on Hardball with Tingle-Leg Matthews and bashed Obama. Can you say “buying the election?” Can you say Priorities?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

today,
Elitist? I would call it a poor choice of words. I do think it’s rather elitist to spend over 150 000 bucks on clothes. Well, you can do that but don ‘t go around saying you’re an “Average” American.
Yeah, I take umbrage to McCain and Palin thinking that they are somehow more “American” then Obama and Biden. Or how certain parts of America are “pro-America” or how the Northern part of Virginia is not “real Virginia” and is “Communist Country”. “Country first or Obama first”.
Newsflash John, no one gave you a monopoly on patriotism. If I were Republican, I would be pissed the McCain is suggesting that somehow, my friend or family member who served in Iraq is less-then patriotic for supporting the other ticket.
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel- Samuel Johnson.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

so in two years we will be seeing some other female rep. cand wearing those clothes,and then in four years we will see palin in them again.
so now that the RNC does not have a Cand. for president.
they are starting a “Thrift Store”
thanks to bush with support of mccain.
and
Hey, I’ll buy some of those hand-me-downs

Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz! | October 22, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

well, this dem would love to see sarah palin working every saturday night on SNL
just don’t let her anywhere near the
white House.
Sarah Palin for SNL

Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz! | October 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Grey Matter – On November 4, I think a lot of the Obama-bashers and their “more American than thou” crowd are going to be shocked at the margin of victory for Sen. Obama. I, myself, am retired military, and I work on an Air Force base with defense contractors, U.S. government civilians, and (obviously) military personnel. I couldn’t begin to count the number of people who were originally McCain supporters (following the traditional military/Dept. of Defense mindset) who now say some version of “no way, no how am I voting for McCain.” And the primary reason? Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

It just further confirms that this woman is a fake and a fraud. She’s still playing dressup like in her pageant days, except now the taxpayers funded her Neiman Marcus shopping spree.

Posted by: Vicky | October 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Grey Matter says “Elitist? I would call it a poor choice of words.”
You are the one who first used the word elitist. Snobbery is part of the definition. Do you think of moose hunters as snobs?
Well, most of America, at least us non-elitists, think that Obama is an elitist and Palin is not.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

today – You talk to ME about “advancing the discussion”, and then claim that those who support Obama “like Iranian terrorists”? Is that “advancing the discussion”? Or is it, as virtually everything we hear from the right these days, just more evidence of an absolute deficit of ideas, and an intellectual bankruptcy so profound that all that’s left is mudslinging and name-calling?

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

cheer up,smile,nertz! says “Sarah Palin for SNL”!
I like it. We all know Obama has won. THere is no quibbling about that. He bought the election fair and square b=y giving 95% of the voter a $500 check to sell out.
Sarah Palin for SNL. She is going to be having fun in Alaska while the Obama is palling around with Pelosi, Reid, Barney Franks, Chuck Schumer, and light headed Joe Biden in sweaty DC.

Posted by: today | October 22, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Sorry, today. But I tend to disagree. I think Alaskans, now that Palin’s premature advancement to the national stage has given them insight into some of her dealings with per diem, travel pay for her kids, etc., are going to think long and hard about how they feel about her as the “face” of Alaska. (And please don’t give me the “most popular governor in America” junk. It’s solely based on approval ratings from over a year ago.)

Posted by: Al | October 22, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Reminds me of a movie…
Pretty Woman.
Except picturing McCain as Richard Gere makes me feel kind of queasy.

Posted by: Joe the Janitor | October 22, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

In the end, it doesn’t really matter what politicians spend on clothes.
But I do think that the public, in general, has been tuned into these kinds of messages.
Edwards’ 400$ haircut, being hammered over and over in the press, sort of primed the pump for Sixpack Sarah’s Six Figure Shopping Spree.

Posted by: Joe the Janitor | October 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

You mean she spend $150K for the boring, dated, matronly crap she’s wearing? She should have sought my advice. At least she could have lost in style.

Posted by: Vicky | October 22, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

David Varet: “…even PUMA’s are backing Obama whole-heartily”
Umm On which planet have you found PUMAs backing Obama whole, or even half, heartedly?
Just spewing -nonsense- doesn’t transform it into fact; it’s still -nonsense-.

Posted by: heart.puma | October 22, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

So these clothes were purchased for Palin but she will return them to the RNC and they won’t count as gifts? Perhaps some tax lawyers/accountants out there can shed some light on this.
*****
Isn’t Ted Stevens on trial for bribery and defending himself with a similar argument?

Posted by: Patience | October 22, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I am no fan of Sarah Palin, but I think this is a non-issue. Palin was expected to go from the regional to the national stage, and woman candidates are scrutinized more than male candidates. That is just a fact. Think of how much ink has been spilled over Hillary’s pantsuits. I think of it as a professional campaign expense, and if the campaign buys the clothes, the candidate should return them once the campaign is over. Do I think the amount is excessive, yes, but she is being dressed for media markets, and if she had not looked professional, she would have been criticized for that. I would never vote for Palin in a million years, but no one is asking the male candidates about this.

Posted by: Ang | October 22, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The RNC says the clothes will be donated to charity. This is very confusing to me, most people receiving charity are those in need, those that have lost their jobs mainly due to trickle down economics that McCain supports, those that have lost their homes due to McCain’s support of deregulation of financial institutions. Where in Hades are the people that receive such expensive item going to wear them, maybe they can be the best dressed people in the unemployment line, the best dressed people at the soup kitchen, it make no sense. I find it very impolite to laugh at people that do stupid things, but what the heck, I can’t help laughing at the people that donated to the RNC. HA!,HA,HA!,HA,HA,HA!!!

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | October 22, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Sarah Palin is described as a pit-bull, recent events suggest she is more like a black widow that slithers under the cover of night and bites you when you least expect it. John McCain is more like the pit-bull, a snarl on his face, and an unprovoked attack when your back is turned. Both scare the bejesus out of me.

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | October 22, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

These posts are so full of wrong information its hard to know where to begin. Obama did not give $800,000 to ACORN – maybe that is on Rush Limbaugh, but it is false. The number is $80,000, which was given by another organization. I do know, however, that a man was just ARRESTED in California for having voters sign a petition and then changing their party to Republican without their knowledge. His group is called Young Political Majors, and he was hired directly by the CALIFORNIA GOP. I imagine he made far more than $80,000. Read the Calif newspapers. Michelle Obama did not call for caviar at the Walfdorf. She did not even stay at the Waldorf. Page 6 has very nicely retracted and corrected its story. I don’t know what Michelle Obama pays for clothes – but I do know she appeared on the View in a dress that looked great and cost a little over $100.
Most of my famiy is rich – and they worked hard to get there. They deserve it. But they are not hypocrites. They are not multimillionaires, who were raised in the most privledged circumstances possible, like John McCain. This is a guy who has never been worried about money a day in his life and pretends he understands the working man. He can’t call on his own experiences, so he finds props like Sarah Palin and a guy from Ohio. My guess is that he cannot even speak the language of his hired help. The McCain/Palin ticket is a vote for the rich. We have always redistributed money in this country. The problem is that under Bush/Cheney and McCain/Biden, the money is redistributed to the rich, instead of education and health care. We’re going to need more of that as this market crisis trickles down.
And if Obama is a socialist, why is Warren Buffett, the richest (and maybe most capitalistic) man in America suporting him? Buffett is an incredibly bright, generous and patriotic American – and he is not putting his money on John McCain.

Posted by: Mara | October 22, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

PUMAs!!!!
My favorite mythical creature, aside from the Jackelope.

Posted by: Joe the Janitor | October 22, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Well, considering she didn’t “know” she had to report reimbursements for all those per dia she claimed for meals at her home as Governor, it wouldn’t surprise me that she doesn’t know this too.

Posted by: Pacific moderate | October 22, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Gov. Palin could have saved Republican donors approx $148,000 just by asking Tina Fey where she bought her Sarah Palin costumes.

Posted by: Jamey | October 22, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Actually, there are alot of women’s organizations who COULD use the generous donation from Sarah Palin. I know because I run one. The Career Wardrobe is in Philadelphia and we help women throughout Southeastern PA transition to work by providing them with free professional clothing. Imagine how many women we could outfit and help to break the cycle of poverty with Governor Palin’s generous donation! I’d love to get a letter to her campaign asking them to do what they claim and donate to our charity. I don’t think the women we help care who donates, as long as they can go into a job interview feeling good about themselves and looking professional!

Posted by: Career_Wardrobe | October 22, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I am not a tax attorney, but if the RNC owns the clothes, and they are in fact returned, why should Palin be taxed any more than a factory worker who uses special protective clothing issued by an employer?
Second, even if Palin had to declare the portion of the $150K attributable to clothing, she should have a corresponding deduction–unless she wears them for social occasions apart from the campaign.
Third, why would ABC News care?

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | October 22, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

The Pitbull’s lipstick put on by a make-up artist is way too expensive!
$8,672.55 for ONE month!

Posted by: Leah | October 22, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I am curious — is it even legal to take political contributions and use for clothing and hairdos and makeup? I would not have had a problem if Mr. or Mrs. McCain had spent some of Mrs. McCain’s money to buy her some new outfits but wonder why “Joe the Plumber” and others who donated their money for the compaign should buy clothing for she and her family – especially a baby!! Wonder who paid for the “boyfriend” to fly to Minnesota? Would love to read an answer to that one…
Michelle Obama, on the other hand, was seen at a rally with military wives and families in a simple skirt, white blouse, and sweater. The “first duds” (I mean first dude) must be enjoying his new duds.

Posted by: patti | October 22, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Ooops… it was HIGH than that!
$13,200 – to put lipstick on the pitbull!
….The Sleuth has learned that Palin’s high-paid traveling make-up artist is Amy Strozzi, who was nominated for an Emmy Award for her work as head of makeup on “So You Think You Can Dance.” Strozzi was paid $13,200 by the McCain-Palin campaign last month alone, according to the campaign’s latest financial disclosure report filed this week.

Posted by: Leah | October 22, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Sarah Palin’s $150,000 worth of clothing, makeup & hairdos are “loaned” to her.
Wait a minute, Ted Stevens’ is on trial right now trying to defend that a massage chair in his house for 7 years wasn’t a gift but “loaned” to him??
Is “loaned” the Republican buzz word to evade paying taxes!

Posted by: Christine | October 22, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

hey joe ur $100 donation to RNC is used for Palin’s boot polish expenses..

Posted by: Mark the Middleclass | October 22, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

can’t help but thinking of RNC donators being fooled by buying accessories for Palin’s wardrobe.. (btw where can i get a lipstick for my pitbull?)

Posted by: Jeremy | October 22, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

All I can say is this is the gal who is telling other women she is the ‘Wal-Mart’ mom, and the hockey mom, and the ‘just like them’ mom. Funny, I was at the local Wal-Mart a few days ago and the women in the check out line in front of me were not talking about going over to Sacks afterwards and picking up a couple hundred bucks worth of new clothes. Although they all looked like they had done a nice job of brushing or combing their own hair and putting on their own make up. I suppose it shouldn’t be so much of a surprise that they just wanted to dress Sarah up for the part she is ‘playing.’ I would imagine that eventually the State Of Alaska will receive an expence report requesting reimbursment for at least some of this silliness anyway. Why not, one reporter already said that the same guys who built the 15 million dollar hockey center for her, also helped her hubby put up the new house. Gee, there sure is a lot of free stuff comes with her job huh? My big grumble is real regular folks paying to dress up her husband. Come on people, give us a break. (Is he on ‘Official secret V.P. business?) Course the instant Republican response is always to point at somebody else when a question is brought up. Mrs. Obama dresses within her means and within their budget. It is not important for her to be ‘beautiful’ for all the rest of us, only for her husband. As far as Palin paying taxes on the clothes…seriously, don’t you think she knows how to get out of that one already? Dah.

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

To Stephen Gianelli,
…’Unless she weats them for social occasions apart from the campaign.’
Gee, like Saturday Night Live?

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Opps. That should have been ‘wears’ not ‘weats.’ My error, I apologize. I think the point still stands.
You also asked why the news media cares anyway. Cause it ‘aint her dough. And she is attempting to play herself off as ‘one of us.’ And there ‘aint a whole lot of us can spend 150,000 clams in a two month period without breaking a sweat. In fact, that 150,000 buckoroos would have kept quite a few people in their homes for awhile, instead of living in the street or in a shelter or with relatives. And lastly, I seriously doubt that if the McCain/Palin (or is that the Palin/McCain campaign?) had of openly said, ‘Hey, we want to do a special fund raiser so we can dress Sarah up real nice for you photo bugs, and so she doesn’t have to look like you regular folks, a huge line would have formed with their checkbooks out.
:)

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

This is the woman who feels our pain? Is just like us? I mean, just how stupid can get this campaign get?
You take a girl from the boondocks who is supposed to be little Miss Main Street, and you make her up to look like Jackie O?
If I were a donor, I’d want a refund! They should have spent the money on a tutor instead of a new wardrobe! She may look pretty, but she’s a moron!

Posted by: Mia | October 22, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Well, if the plane trip to Hawaii costs around 150,000 bucks, WE all would care. Obviously you have nobody you love enough to buy a plane ticket to go see when they are sick. Take a look at the photo of Obama sitting at his desk with his feet up. Yea, those are holes in the bottom of his shoe soles. And they are NOT 500.00 dollar shoes either. Wake up folks…

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Who cares!? Come, one, people. Even Oprah does this type of “wardrobe” dressing. She has a resale shop in Chicago where the clothes (costumes) that she’s worn on the show or elsewhere are sold and the proceeds benefit her charities. Her company owns the clothes, and so even Oprah is not hit with tax on them. No big deal.
Please find something more substantial in which to find fault. Really, our country is going to hell in a hand basket and we are bickering over minutia?!
It’s no wonder other countries are laughing at us.

Posted by: Rosemary Kinman | October 22, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Palin, as a running mate, absolutely needed a new wardrobe, no one is disputing that. What’s the fuss all about? She claims to be a hockey mom from Main Street, and (like all hard working Americans, yes you Joe The P) sits at the kitchen table with Todd wondering how they’re going to pay the bills. The fuss is about the $150k!! No big deal if she didn’t repeat over and over how she’s just like struggling, small town Americans! Only in the GOP: Having 7 houses = you’re a hard working American. Having intellect and education = elitist.

Posted by: Shaz | October 22, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Did the first dude also get clothes?

Posted by: morrigan | October 22, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

You betcha! They said about $5,000.00 worth. But his sled dogs got nothing.

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Come On,
Can we please focus on the issues? I can’t believe the ongoing pettiness on the part of the media. All 4 candidates have substanial positions to explore. I don’t care about their clothing budgets, if they wear flag pins, etc.
And ABC, you really are the worst. Get out of entertainment and sensational mode when reporting on politics. Just the issues, please.
What happened to your journalistic ethics?
Margi
San Diego, CA

Posted by: Margi | October 22, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

This does bear an uncanny resemblance to the situation with Ted Steven’s fancy massage chair. It must be nice living in a fantasy world where you can make up your own tax and ethics rules.
The other candidates are wearing their own clothes on the trail. McCain has a fondness for fancy shoes, but there is no indication that he has had the campaign buy any for him. Michelle Obama has stated a fondness for The Gap and H&M. She can afford her own clothes since she shops like a normal person, not like a millionaire on holiday.

Posted by: fletc3her | October 22, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

What issues would that be Margi? That Obama speaks of the economy while McCain and pretty girl speak about Obama? That Obama talks about the pain the middle class is going through while McSame and his side kick talk about finding a terrorist to string up? Or is the issue Obama talks about in worn out shoes with holes in the soles from walking while your precious Palin is breaking in a new pair or more of stylish pumps each day? No mam, you stop. It is about claiming to be ‘one of us’ and trying to out dress the rest of us. If you do not see the ignorance, you need therapy.

Posted by: Larry W | October 22, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Once Sarah Palin wears the clothes that she accepted from the RNC (gifts), they are “used.”
What do you get when you donate your clothes to charity? Do you get to write off the full price?? No, they no longer have the same value (maybe $30/bag full).
If the Republicans were honest about it Sarah Palin would pay the tax for the $150,000 in gifts and then write off the depreciated value.
If these elitest Republicans paid their fair share of taxes and didn’t use all their loopholes to avoid paying them, we & the country would be better off.

Posted by: Christine | October 23, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

to susan from the beginning of this thread:
Obama has a birth Certificate.. he was born in an area that would consider him a “natural citizen”
McCain, on the other hand, was born in an area in the world of which the law specifically, at the time of birth, was stated to NOT BE AN EXCEPTION…. Panama Canal Zone was the Only area listen to be out of the exception for military births and such. Even though there was a law later that would make anyone born after 1937 to be considered “natural” The LAW CAN’T be Grandfathered!!! Natural means at time of birth.. at McCain’s time of birth he was considered NOT a Natural citizen. He might be a citizen of the United States, but he is not a “Natural Citizen”.
Before you start to slander people make sure you have done your own research.
I will not be voting for either of these candidates.. The Political System is STALE and it’s time for a Third Party to make for real “Change”. Most of the third parties agree with each other on most key issues. this obviously means something.

Posted by: Greatzky | October 23, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Sarah Palin recently told Brian Williams should would release her medical records. What is the hold up? Voters want to know about your health before they vote – not after.

Posted by: hottopics | October 23, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.