By Natalie Gewargis

Oct 1, 2008 11:52am

A Second Order of ‘Crap Sandwiches’?

Meeting privately with his fellow House Republicans Sunday night, House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, infamously described the economic rescue package as a "crap sandwich" that he was nonetheless serving to his members, and asking them to vote for.

Largely, they refrained. The bill failed in the house, 205-228, with 66% of the House GOP caucus voting against it.

The Senate announced last night that it is tonight voting on an version of that bill that Senate leaders — in consultation with Boehner’s office — amended with the hopes of winning more House Republicans when the House takes up the bill again tomorrow or Friday. They are trying to jump start the process, to pressure the House to act.

But some fear that all the Senate is doing is ordering up a different kind of "crap sandwich" — one that will be found distasteful by even more Democrats, winning over few Republicans.

Significantly, neither House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, nor House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo. — in charge of vote-counting — signed off on this bill.

While the Senate will pass its version of the rescue bill with more than 70 votes, according to Senate sources, Senators have taken the partisan bickering over the rescue bill and added a stalled disagreement over a separate issue — "tax extenders," or extending various tax relief provisions that are due to expire — into the mix.

Many House Republicans like the addition of tax extenders. So it’s possible that some of the 133 Republicans who voted against the bill will join the 65 who voted for it.

But some conservative Democrats have expressed serious concerns about the fact that extending these tax cuts is not being paid for in the budget. Adding the provision may attract House Republicans, but it could alienate these fiscally-conscious Democrats, causing them to abandon the 140 House Democrats who voted for the bill to join the 95 who voted against it.

Will this Senate move be like throwing a bucket of water or a bucket of kerosene onto the smoldering embers of the rescue bill?

The Senate version of the rescue, with its tax bill attached, is certainly geared more at gaining Republican votes than Democratic ones. In fact, look for some fiscally conservative Democrats to jump ship.

Witness the paper statement House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., issued last night about the Senate vote, released last night.

She did not send an "attaboy Harry" over to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

Instead, she offered the tepid, "The Congress will work its will."

**

To the extent that there is a third party in the Congress, it’s the Blue Dogs, 47 conservative and moderate Democrats that insist on fiscal responsibility. Usually the Blue Dogs are united on spending measures and they carry a great weight in the House, where Democrats can’t pass anything without their say-so.

Blue Dogs were split on the rescue bill — 26 for and 21 against.

Blue Dogs were united, however, against the tax extenders bill that Senators are going to lash onto the rescue bill. And it wasn’t just the Blue Dogs. 218 Democrats declared in a letter to Reid in June they would not support a tax extenders bill that violates "pay as you go" rules. Republicans in the Senate took the opposite view and blocked all tax bills passed by House Democrats. There had been no resolution this year.

It’s unclear how many Blue Dogs (if any) will be ticked off enough about the tax bill to jump ship on the rescue bill it will soon be attached to. They’ll have to go back on their word to support the Senate version of the rescue.

Blue Dogs want all tax cuts to be "paid for" with spending cuts or tax increases elsewhere. And the version of the tax extenders bill (which extends tax credits for renewable energy research and production) passed by the House claimed to do just that.

Senators passed a bill more palatable to Republicans, which was not "paid for," but just extended the popular tax credits. Senators also threw in a short-term patch for the dreaded AMT, which applies archaic tax laws written to make rich people a generation ago pay their taxes, but today ensnares middle class Americans trying to write off their mortgages. The senate didn’t pay for this tax cut either, although its unclear Blue Dogs would have fallen on their swords over an un-paid for middle class tax relief bill.

The tax bill, in fact, had been written off and it appeared that Democrats would wait for next year to resolve things.

The Senate should clear its version of the rescue package easily tonight. They’ll add in the provision to raise the FDIC insurance limit to 250,000 per person per bank and also tack on the popular tax extender legislation (to extend tax credits for renewable energy research and other matters they passed earlier)

Then it goes over to a very uncertain future on the other side of the building.

**

House Democrats are saying things along the lines of, "Well, I assume Leader Boehner knows he can deliver 30 votes for the Senate version, given that he signed of on this."

The implication: not only will Boehner need to provide the entire 13-vote margin that the bill lost by on Monday, but also that the addition of the unpaid-for "tax extenders" could cause up to 17 Democrats who voted for the bill Monday to walk. If not more.

Some in Democratic leadership hope that the Senate addition of another tax relief provision — what’s called an AMT patch — could help keep those Blue Dogs on board, and that maybe some of the more liberal members will change their votes for the bill to support the tax extensions for renewable energy sources.

And, as previously discussed, they are also contemplating adding an extension of unemployment insurance to the bill.

Job numbers come out Friday morning (it seems likelier now that the vote will be Friday rather than Thursday) so that could help them pass it as well — Democrats hope — since those numbers are expected to be typically bad.

So bottom line: this thing could actually lose worse than it did Monday.

– Jake Tapper and Z. Byron Wolf

User Comments

Boehner is almost done. If he falls, the party falls with him, including the McCain campaign.

Posted by: winston | October 1, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

jpt quotes Pelosi:
Instead, she offered the tepid, “The Congress will work its will.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

McCain Urges Bush To Spend $1 Trillion On Bailout — Without Congressional Approval
I’m not making this up. John McCain today urged the Bush Administration — on more than one occasion — to immediately and uniliterally spend $1 trillion buying up home mortgages.
I was watching live when he made the proposal this morning, and it seemed like such a staggeringly insane idea that I assumed he couldn’t be serious. He couldn’t think that Bush should just spend $1 trillion without asking Congress for permission…could he?
But then I saw his economic adviser try to back the idea up, and then I saw McCain make the proposal again during the NBC Nightly newscast. So he’s serious. He really thinks that Bush should just spend $1 trillion without talking to Congress, without seeking approval, without building any sort of consensus — without getting any protections whatsoever for taxpayers.
YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE VOTING FOR THIS MAN ARE AS INSANE AS HE IS…..

Posted by: beck | October 1, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Poor Boehner. He is trying to get House Republicans to vote to get the evil government to do something about the sainted market. Istead his friends want to change the “mark to market accounting rules” so the banks can wave a magic wand and turn their wortheless investments they never should have made into worthwhile assets. Great choice for America. Print money we don’t have or believe in magic.

Posted by: ricky | October 1, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

How about a 3rd crap sandwich? The House Republicans have an alternative that includes: a) tax breaks for companies who have sent jobs overseas b) a clause which allows corporations to go back 5 years and claim losses and redo their taxes c) a capital gains cut and d) a change to corporate accounting requirements (back to pre-Enron accounting) which allows them to inflate their value. This is supposed to clean up Wall Street? This is a bill that was written by corporate lobbyists and leads us into more of the same. And your Republican reepresentative is calling it an alternative. An alternative for who? Burson Marsteller? I’m not making this up. Call your representative and get a copy of the plan.

Posted by: mara | October 1, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Leave it to the Republicans to protect the very ones who have and will continue to make money off us.
Hope and Pray the Dems and Obama shoot it down.
I did hear on the news this morning several Dems are now against it, that the Repugs are trying to put bills in that have been turned down several times this year just to get them passed. Must be the more money for the big companies.
OBAMA/BIDEN STAND UP FOR THE PEOPLE TONIGHT!!!

Posted by: beck | October 1, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

It still remains a “crap sandwich” and Boehner is only speaking for the overwhelming number of average citizens (both democrat and republican) who view this as a major boondoggle that they didn’t create but are expected to bail out.
When average Joe or Jane screw up, they get fired, they go broke. When government fails, they are not held to account.

Posted by: Captain America | October 1, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Senator McCain sits down with the editorial board of the Des Moines Register and gets stumped by one of the best questions I’ve heard asked of him so far this campaign.
“Throughout your adult life, am I right, as a veteran and a member of Congress and now someone over sixty five, throughout your adult life have you been covered by a taxpayer-financed health care plan?
Think of the brilliance of this question: McCain has received “government-run” health care his entire life, and I’m sure he’s never had a single complaint.
If “government-run” health care is so inefficient and wasteful, how has it served him so effectively for over thirty years?
If it’s good enough for him, why isn’t it good enough for the 40 million Americans who desperately need it and are forced to live without it?
I’m always amazed at how successful the Republicans are at convincing voters they don’t want something that clearly works well, and something that they themselves have no problem taking advantage of.
Mission Accomplished

Posted by: Rex | October 1, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Thank you Rex…. I am a breast cancer survivor who needs this health care plan to pass. I can not get medical insurance with anyone for 5 years. I also have heard that in Canada and London people love their government ran health system… No complaints. I have family who visited both and in London my niece actually need to be hospitalized and said the care was wonderful, and no, so far, she has not been charged a dime.

Posted by: beck | October 1, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

test

Posted by: beck | October 1, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The Senate had better vote NO on this fraud:
“Hundreds of billions of dollars are going to bail out FOREIGN INVESTORS. They know it, they demanded it, and the bill has been carefully written to make sure that can happen.” – Brad Sherman , D-California.
The Bill says:
(9) TROUBLED ASSETS.—The term ‘‘troubled assets’’ means—
(A) residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary determines promotes financial market stability;
and (B) any other financial instrument that the Secretary, after consultation with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, determines the purchase of which is necessary to promote financial market stability, but only upon transmittal of such determination, in writing, to the appropriate committees of Congress.
Note carefully – there is no “Made in the USA” requirement, and nothing prohibits a non-US institution from “selling” a security to a US bank, which then immediately resells it to the TARP. Nor is there any provision to prevent Secretary Paulson from defining any other financial asset as “promoting financial market stability”, and while he must notify Congress, they cannot block his purchase.”

Posted by: MacGhil | October 1, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

GOD is NOT ON the REPUBLICANS SIDE,
otherwise GOD WOULD HAVE NOT ALLOWED these amount of DISASTERS to HAPPEN to the US:
ATTACKED in 9/11
KATRINA
IRAQ WAR
ECONOMIC MELTDOWN
WE NEED to LOOK at the FACTS and UNDERSTAND WHY this is BEING ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
These are WARNINGS…
Let’s get on GOD’S SIDE:
DEMOCRATS FOR 09′

Posted by: the truth behind the veils | October 1, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Beck:
I hope you continue on towards a full recovery.
It’s hard for me to understand how, at the seeming ‘drop of a hat’ there’s almost a trillion dollars available for business bailout and financing, but,… when it comes to citizens basic needs, like health care, there is never any money for these ‘socialistic’ services.
Sometimes it seems to me the the ‘conservatives’ and republicans want to inflict as much pain and suffering on the maximum amount of people as possible.

Posted by: Rex | October 1, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

WHY NO ONE IS INVESTIGATING TO WHAT CANDIDATE ARE THESE WALL STREET ECONOMIC TYCOONS WHO ARE MAKING MILLIONS OUT OF US, GIVING MONEY TO?
I SAY MOST OF THEM ARE REPUBLICANS,
AND THAT IT WHY NO ONE IS INVESTIGATING THIS.
DEMOCRATS FOR 09′

Posted by: the independen thinker | October 1, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“WHY NO ONE IS INVESTIGATING TO WHAT CANDIDATE ARE THESE WALL STREET ECONOMIC TYCOONS WHO ARE MAKING MILLIONS OUT OF US, GIVING MONEY TO?
I SAY MOST OF THEM ARE REPUBLICANS”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

So what is the story on Nancy Pelosi embezzling money to her husband?

Posted by: American Splendor | October 1, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Obama and the liberal democrats are just evil!! Be carefull you might just get what you wish for….

Posted by: ynot | October 1, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

You may also be pleased to know that I strongly opposed and voted against the earlier bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These two government-sponsored mortgage giants’ own mismanagement and poor decision making caused their downfall and were a major factor in causing our current crisis. The plan to bailout these mortgage giants could cost American taxpayers up to $300 billion, making the U.S. taxpayers liable for up to $1 trillion when combined with the Treasury Department’s $700 billion proposal.
I believe that taxpayers should not bail irresponsible banks, mortgage lenders, and borrowers out of their bad decisions.
Again, thank you for contacting me about this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me again in the future about any other issue important to you and your family.
THIS WAS FROM A SENATOR AND SO FAR THE NAYS HAVE IT. WASHINGTON BETTER CANCEL THE VOTE. NO BAILOUT.

Posted by: In NW PA | October 1, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Nothing but Economic Terrorism….by the way did anyone look at the date
09-29-08
0+9 = 9
2+9 = 11 9/11/8
0+8 = 8
=

Posted by: MARK | October 1, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Well at least this bill contains “cost recovery peroid for motorsports racing track facility”… “Railroad track maintenance”…and “economic development credit for American Samoa”….I”ve been worried about them all as I am sure we all have. …I guess this is what you get when you stir a mix air-heads, lawyers and lifetime politicians.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | October 1, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Let’s get this straight. Another $700,000,000,000.00. Tax breaks. More back up for deposits…..!!!!!!!
Where is the friggin response to TOO MUCH spending and TOO MUCH credit. This is ludicrous. There are a bunch of trained monkeys in Washington doing a jig for their fatcat contributors.

Posted by: Ray | October 1, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Eat this, it’s good for you!!

Posted by: ynot | October 1, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

The bailout reminds me of a young lady who was told her bank account was overdrawn and remarked” I can’t be out of money! I’m not out of checks!” Is that the Senate’s excuse? No Bailout! They are trying to write a check they can’t cash. But come election day I bet the American People can cash a check. I am still trying to reach my Senators, but still no luck getting though. I just read that idiots named Hoyer and Blunt say there are less messages coming in today, if they are turning off the fax machines, bouncing emails, and refusing to answer the phones I wonder why? No Bailout.

Posted by: AmerVtrn | October 1, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Even with the lettuce and garnish…it’s still a “crap sandwich” for non-insured, tax paying, hard working, budget conscious family oriented Americans to chew on for years to come.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | October 1, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

At least this bill contains “cost recovery peroid for motorsports racing track facility”… “Railroad track maintenance”…and “economic development credit for American Samoa.” The horrible “leaders” are adding everything under the sun to this bill. Contact Congress – tell them to vote NO -

Posted by: Brent | October 1, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

I don’t like the idea of bailing out these jerks anymore than the next taxpayer, particularly when I hear about things like Lehman’s $2.5 billion “bankruptcy bonuses” for its executives. God forbid that the jerks who are responsible for this mess would have to give up a vacation home or two, stop shopping at Bergdorf’s, or sell off one of their BMW’s.
If it was just the jerks who were going to suffer by letting their financial institutions fold, I’d happily punch the flush button.
Unfortunately, small businesses, responsible financial institutions, and normal folks are the ones who are really going to suffer if credit freezes up. These are the people we need to be concerned about as this deal moves forward.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 1, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Vote for Bob Barr, the only conservative presidential candidate opposed to the bailouts. Sure he won’t win in 2008, but you can at least vote your conscience and take a stand against the socialism and nationalism that will occur with a democrat-controlled congress. Because we all know full well that McCain will sign any crap socialist legislation they write, just like he supports this bailout, just like he sided with Feingold on campaign finance and Kennedy on immigration. McCain is no friend to conservatives, and is almost as bad as Obama. In truth, it won’t matter which one gets elected because McCain talks bipartisanship and he won’t veto socialist democrat bills. Vote for Barr and make a statement that we want to return this country to conservative values. A vote for McCain is a vote for a “progressive” republican party.

Posted by: seth | October 1, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

You break it, you buy it. If the house neocons break the agreement this time, they will be stuck with it as the economy collapses. Already people are being laid off and small businesses with long histories of being able to get operating credit are now being denied. Auto dealers are struggling (Ford down what? Thirty percent and no more leases?). If the Republican neocons want to be stuck with that, let them be stuck with it. Except we’ll all be stuck with being unemployed and losing our 401Ks. But we won’t forget. Believe me, we won’t forget. After Hoover, how many years did the Democrats hold office?

Posted by: JAB | October 1, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

People, you need to contact your Senators and Representatives about this BAILOUT – we, the Taxpayers, will ultimately get the bill for this!
This is all a bunch of CRAP – let Wall Street bail themselves out. The Wall Street Executives/CEO’s will walk away with Millions for running their Companies out of business. The Government has NO BUSINESS bailing out these Financial Companies because they made bad decisions. Prediction: 5 years from now the Government will still have all these worthless “assets” as they’re calling them. The Government, as a result, will be the largest private property owner in the US.
Use some of that $700B toward Healthcare and securing Social Security – imagine what $700B could do for those initiatives. If they put $700B into BAILING OUT you SAFELY BET there will be NO MONEY for them in the future – that’s a given!

Posted by: Marcel | October 1, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, infamously described the economic rescue package as a “crap sandwich”and “It’s like a big cowpie with a little bit of marshmallow inside and I don’t want to eat the cowpie,” said Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas
Are two of the most civil things said about the Bailout, My personal favorites are not for polite company.
The bailout reminds me of a young lady who was told her bank account was overdrawn and remarked” I can’t be out of money! I’m not out of checks!” Is that the Senate’s excuse? No Bailout!

Posted by: AmerVtrn | October 1, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

WoW I can not believe this scum of the earth are still add it. They do not represent the people. The people have spoken and they do not want bail out those pieces of dirt from wall street. This just show that Pelosi, Ried, Obama, McSame, and the President belong to Wall Street.

Posted by: Jake | October 1, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

This bailout is a scam on the American taxpayers. They are going to steal from us and our children just so these CEOs can keep their luxury jets. This is our chance as citizens to stand-up to the Wall Street fat cats! The following Senators ore up for re-election, so if you live in these states, please tell them “no to corporate welfare”.
Alabama – Jeff Sessions,
Alaska – Ted Stevens,
Arkansas – Mark Pryor,
Delaware – Joe Biden,
Georgia – Saxby Chambliss,
Illinois – Richard Durbin,
Iowa – Tom Harkin,
Kansas – Pat Roberts,
Kentucky – Mitch McConnell,
Louisiana – Mary Landrieu,
Maine – Susan Collins,
Massachusetts – John Kerry,
Michigan – Carl Levin,
Minnesota – Norm Coleman,
Mississippi – Thad Cochran,
Mississippi – Roger Wicker,
Montana – Max Baucus,
New Hampshire – John Sununu,
New Jersey – Frank Lautenberg,
North Carolina – Elizabeth Dole,
Oklahoma – Jim Inhofe,
Oregon – Gordon Smith,
Rhode Island – Jack Reed,
South Carolina – Lindsey Graham,
South Dakota – Tim Johnson,
Tennessee – Lamar Alexander,
Texas – John Cornyn,
West Virginia – Jay Rockefeller,
Wyoming – Michael Enzi,
Wyoming – John Barrasso

Posted by: alan | October 1, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

The controlling party has been sticking their heads in the sand or benefitted greatly from lobbyist. Listen to this from their own mouths.
And we want to trust Obama and his party. The controlling party is the party that benefited the most from these bad loans and stands to benefit allot more with a bailout. Change? I doubt the controlling party will change their stripes with an Obama win.

Posted by: MBell_TX | October 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I am an Obama Supporter, but most importantly I am an American Supporter. This is unamerican.
Why is everyone blaming the party politics for this when the FED created this enormous Bubble. If it wasnt for this real estate Bubble Freddie and Fannie wouldn’t have had this gigantic problem (no doubt there would be a problem but it wouldn’t bring down the economy). Greenspan and Bernake dropped rates every friggin quarter creating a credit spree. Everyone wanted to get in the game, Greed took over for everyone, from wall street to the everyday person wanting their own house they cant afford. Who is responsible for the FED chairman? I am not sure but something should have been done to reign the FED in.

Posted by: Brendan | October 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Unless and until they put something in this bill to help the homeowners with their adjustable rate loans and outragous credit card rates it should be a big fat NO! This vote will change all the House and Senate seats this fall….they’re all going down.

Posted by: linda n carolina | October 1, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Why can’t Congress just write a bill that will attend to the crisis at hand, instead of adding on measures that one or the other side is not for? Can they for a moment stop playing politics and just take care of business? It is like trying to deal with a bunch of immature adolescents. No wonder that things are in the mess that they are. We already can’t pay for the mess we have now, so don’t go adding on anything that there is not ready money for.

Posted by: LW | October 1, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

You still don’t know that number 1 donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went to Dodd and number 2 to Obama?? Obama in one year in Congress got more money than anyone else from these corrupt companies. Wonder why?? Obama will bail out all the corrupt Wall street cronies and will raise your taxes to pay for it. And don’t expect any health insurance or anythingh elese he is promissing becuause there are and will be no money! No bail out. Divide the money you want to use for bail out to the tax paiers – they will rebound the economy. The corrupt cronies won’t!

Posted by: Olga Ma | October 1, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I do not think anyone here fully understands what this is for. This is not a Wall Street Bail out but a rescue plan for the US credit. It should have never been call a Wall Street Bailout. If the credit is not fixed soon no one will be able to get loans for anything. No home loans, no car loans, no student loans, and no loans for business. If businesses don’t get loans then no jobs for you and me. The economy then collapses and everybody suffers.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

It would be a big relief if it failed in the senate tonight. This bailout is scary stuff.

Posted by: Barry M | October 1, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Posted by: the truth behind the veils
GOD is NOT ON the REPUBLICANS SIDE,
otherwise GOD WOULD HAVE NOT ALLOWED these amount of DISASTERS to HAPPEN to the US:
ATTACKED in 9/11
KATRINA
IRAQ WAR
ECONOMIC MELTDOWN
WE NEED to LOOK at the FACTS and UNDERSTAND WHY this is BEING ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
These are WARNINGS…
Let’s get on GOD’S SIDE
HEY TRUTH -
God allows these things? Not so. This country has taken God out of schools, mocked Him, misused His name and the list goes on. If you read the book of Revelation America isn’t even mentioned in it. I believe God has taken his hand off this country that once honored and respected His Holy Name.

Posted by: Mac | October 1, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Can someone please explain to me WHY Congress didn’t come up with a bill initially that DIDN’T REWARD Wall Street for their bad business practices?? I think I could actually STOMACH a bailout that SIMPLY DID NOT REWARD BAD BEHAVIOR!

Posted by: Paula | October 1, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

my best to the people who don’t want the assets purchased to give confidence in the credit market. because it will affect everyone who needs credit. well i guess that is business. oh who pays the little guy in the world…oh i guess that is business. it’s an unfortunate reality…but we need business. so be against it all you want and business will suffer and so will the little guy and his 401k. best to all

Posted by: Tammi | October 1, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING! Bad to worse! The revised Senate bailout bill that will be voted on today contains some
very strange additions. Wool Research, Wooden Arrows designed for use by
children, Race Tracks, Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum to name a few.
New Tax earmarks in Bailout bill
- Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)
- Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)
- 6 page package of earmarks for litigants in the 1989 Exxon Valdez
incident, Alaska (Sec. 504)
Tax earmark “extenders” in the bailout bill
- Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)
- American Samoa (Sec. 309)
- Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)
- Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)
- Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)
- Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)
- Railroads (Sec. 316)
- Auto Racing Tracks (317)
- District of Columbia (Sec. 322)
- Wool Research (Sec. 325)

Posted by: Ben | October 1, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

I seriously think the country would be better off if we threw the whole house out and replaced everyone with random people off the street. Forget Obama, Bush and McCain (the three stooges)…Install the ex-prime minister of Japan as president…at least he had some talent…he could sing like Elvis.

Posted by: GK | October 1, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

It’s time to put an end to our government’s ability to run at a significant deficit.
I think we can be sure that _most_ of these nimnulls understand in their personal finances that unrestricted spending on credit is A Bad Thing… it’s time to force them to be equally realistic with public funds. They’re playing games with the world’s economy.
This seems to be nothing more than a photo-op for some of our elected leaders; if they were making a good faith effort we wouldn’t see all the extraneous BS (like tax code modifications) being piled on top of the core legislation.
These ****s (pick the expletive of your choice) are being grossly irresponsible; it’s time to replace them with a new generation of legislators who actually have a clear view of their responsibilities.
Jimmy Carter for President!

Posted by: Dave | October 1, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Well my Congressman Adam Putnam has shut down his web page since the vote.This toe headed, Opie looking, cool aid drinking, Bushnik is the only Florida Congressman that voted yes for the bail out. I hope the Dem’s in Polk County run someone agaist him.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | October 1, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

“You still don’t know that number 1 donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went to Dodd and number 2 to Obama?? Obama in one year in Congress got more money than anyone else from these corrupt companies. ”
You don’t know that Obama’s total haul from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac was $120K?
You dont know that McCain in joint fundraising took in $189K this year alone from just 8 Fannie Mae big wigs?
You don’t know that Rick Davis’s company has been paid $240K this year alone with one official characterizing it as buying access to McCain?
Its amazing what one doesn’t know when one only watches FoxNews.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 1, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

McCain Palin 08
Gimmicks First
I wonder what the next campaign gimmick McCain is going to try? Perhaps a threat to boycott the VP debate because Ifill wrote a book. I dunno

Posted by: billy smith | October 1, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

There are shills who are being paid to leave comments in support of the bailout on news websites and message boards. Call centers have been hired to phone the Senate and pretend to be votors who support the bailout. Wall Street is spending a lot of money to try to get this bill passed. They’ve committed to 150,000 calls to Congress per hour. It is obvious that the vast majority of Americans are strongly oposed to it. We must keep up the pressure.

Posted by: Alan | October 1, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

billy smith …why would the repubs want to miss the VP debate? After all it will be controlled by PBS anchor Gwen Ifill…She just wrote and is releasing a new book promoting Barack Obama. “Political analyst Michelle Malkin argued in a post on National Review that Ifill is “so far in the tank for the Democratic presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running.” ….I say why not just let Michelle Obama run it.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | October 1, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

To CON Gress -
DO NOT bail out the RICH. Save the Middle Class!
We are all tired of being screwed by Congress and their Greedy Upper Two Percent Rich Friends!!!

Posted by: Dave | October 1, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

The ‘Bail Out’ will only work IF it frees up lending AND (here’s the kicker!) Improves consumer confidence.
CONFIDENCE!?
You have got to be kidding me!
There are quite a few feelings that come to mind when I think of Wall Street and our elected officials. I must say, confidence is not one of them!
When the government bails out wall street (and you know they will)the ones who will be feeling confident are the ones who are scared stiff right now. The very ones that promised if this did not happen two weeks ago, it was going to be the end of the world.
What happens when it doesn’t work?

Posted by: Deb | October 1, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

This goes from bad to worse….call…email your rep and tell them NOOOOOOOOOOOOO BAILOUT…NOW!!
THIS IS AN INSULT AND A SLAP IN THE FACE OF ALL AMERICANS….EMAIL…FAX CALL….DO SOMETHING TO STOP THIS MADNESS!!

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Why aren’t the best economic minds in the world crafting this? Paulson isn’t elected and he sure isn’t accountable.

Posted by: EGBOK321 | October 1, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

the truth behind the veils:
I don’t know what God you are talking about, but for the record He doesn’t pick sides. Man created politics. God
didn’t fly planes into the WTC buildings, man did. God did not start the war in Iraq, man did. God did not cause economic breakdown, MAN DID. As
for Katrina, that was a natural disaster and my guess is God didn’t have a hand in that either – its just weather. It happens everyday of every season every year. Don’t you dare use God in that matter, you nor anyone else on earth has the right to do so. Shame on you for trying to lure people in politics with God. Shame.

Posted by: TX312 | October 1, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Posted by: EGBOK321
“Paulson isn’t elected and he sure isn’t accountable.”
good point, but that’s true of just about everything, including the Iraq war…… Paul Wolfowitz and the rest of the neo-cons set the policy which Bush followed and they will never be held to account for their terrible mistakes.
There’s policy advisors for everything…… and it’s they who decide what happens in America.

Posted by: Jazzman | October 1, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Let me just say that I hope these congressmen and women vote their conscience (thumbs up or down) and not base it on re-elections. It’s disgusting to think that someone would put their polital career first and the health and future of our economy second, but that’s clearly what’s happening. If you don’t believe it will help, fine. But if you vote against your judgement just to get re-elected, you’re scum. Sorry, but that’s the risk of being a true leader in this country – you have to be able to make unpopular decisions.

Posted by: I don't like it either | October 1, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

People here actually reading what the revised addition of this bailout package is ……frankly it has nothing to offer the regular tax paying American any more than the last failed bill had……does your government actually think regular struggling Americans give a damn about whether them and small businesses get tax back on investing in solar panels and other energy saving arrangments…….it’s highly unlikely that things like that matter when your heading into winter that will devistate power bills and make it even worse to put a loaf of bread on the table……I really am of the opinion that Governments don’t actually care about people any more …..

Posted by: Anna | October 1, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Instead of bailing out large industries why doesn’t the gov bail out the people? everyone over 18 years of age should get $200,000 (which would total 350 billion dollars-half of the proposed bill. we would be taxed on it as income so the total would be even less. with a sum like that there would be no foreclosures!! It seems more fair this way than congress proposal -
since the taxpayers are going to pay the bill give it to the taxpayers

Posted by: mary | October 1, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Quit thumping your chest over this ridiculous BAILOUT bill. Open your eyes and shut your mouths, quit taking the future away from our children.
Use some Common Sense, the market determines prices, don’t spend taxpayer’s dollars for worthless securities that Wall Street can’t unload on any body but the government fools.

Posted by: CommonCents | October 1, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Vote ‘No’ to the bailout-Resuce Plan. The New Plan, puts Humpty Dumpty back onthe Wall Street. Wall Street is the seperation, between The 5% and the 95%. The New Revisions, only make Wall Street in control again. We wil once again loose our ‘Independence’. Why would anyone support, the New Bill, will only bring forth a Credit Line of ‘Mass Destruction.’Please vote ‘No’ to ‘Wall Street’. No More Division.

Posted by: historyremembered | October 1, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

republican = liar
republican = crook
republican = scam artist
republican = selfish
republican = sanctimonious
republican = nepotist to the nth degree
republican = HISTORY
STICK A FORK IN THE REPUBLICANS …THEY ARE DONE!!!WOOOOOOHOOOOOO VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT STRAIGHT TICKET AND PROVE YOU HAVE WORKING GREY MATTER!!!!

Posted by: bah | October 1, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

My question is Who is going to purchase this $700 BILLION worth of bonds? IRAN???

Posted by: nashfun | October 1, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

The biggest issue is simple ignorance on the part of ideologues on the left and right. Simply put, Wall Street is Main Street. Most Americans seem to be assuming wrongly but understandably that letting Wall Street and the banking system take a hit is nothing more that sweet justice. This is because most Americans feel set apart from both Wall Street and the banking system. After all, how often do you really get a bank loan? Once in a lifetime for a mortgage and maybe two or three times for a car loan. No big deal right? Wrong.
If you receive a paycheck there is a very high likelihood that your employer borrowed money to cover the check – this includes small companies and giant corporations. You see, the cash inflows that occur in a business rarely match the cash outflows so business borrows cash against its assets for a few days every month. Every day, thousands upon thousands of these small transactions take place that ensure you get your paycheck, that allow credit card companies to cover the cost of the goods you purchase until they get paid (this includes you folks who pay off your cards every month), ensure your local gas station has gas, and allow your grocery store to stock sufficient inventory. Nearly every facet of American society as we now experience it is covered by bank liquidity and these small short term loans.
Well guess what? It is these transactions that are at risk. Up until this crises the inter-bank lending rate ran at about 2%. In the last 30 days this rate has risen to over 6% and it is climbing. Banks are afraid to lend money even to each other, how much more afraid will they be to cover YOUR paycheck. Because all loans are backed by assets and because these assets are now suspect no-one is getting a loan. This basic system of liquidity built global capitalism as we know it over the last 150 years. This is collapsing because most Americans do not understand the relationship between Wall Street and Main Street. You cannot stick it to the banks and Wall Street without sticking it to yourself.
As capital dries up, firms are no longer able to do business and earning drop. As earning drop stock price drops and people, that’s you dear readers, get laid off. It also means that your retirement plans, whether pension or 401K, falter.
This is not simply a Wall Street problem. Yes, Wall Street encouraged the loans but us greedy folks on main street gobbled up these loans knowing full well how risky they were. Wall Street and Main Street created this mess and BOTH streets will need to clean it up.
The bail out, in its basic structure, is in fact a sound idea. We can fix this, but we need to move now. While the DOW is falling, it’s the inter-bank lending rate that is signaling trouble. We are in a serious crisis now. IF you are against the bail out you are, quite simply ignorant.

Posted by: Stuart | October 1, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The bailout that is currently proposed seeks to have the government buy all of the subprime loans from the institutions that now own them. With what we now know about Obama’s involvement in the scheme to give loans to people that can not afford to pay them back, what do you think the government is going to do with all of those loans if Obama is elected? Do you think Obama is going to force all of those people to pay those loans? If they don’t pay the loans, do you think Obama is going to foreclose on them? Is Obama going to kick them out of the homes and resell the homes to get back some of the taxpayer’s money? If you believe any of that, than I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. Obama is going to either give them the homes outright as a sort of “mini-reparations” or he will convert the loans into longer term interest free loans. The taxpayers will never see the money again, the Wall Streeters will get to keep their fortunes and get their ’08 bonuses, and the people that should never have bought houses in the first place will be sitting pretty while the rest of us fools pay increased taxes to pay for it all.

Posted by: Saul | October 1, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

So, this bailout bill comes down to a matter of marketing. “We didn’t do a good job of selling it to the American people”, they say. What they’ll do now is repackage it a little, throw in a few bones such as increasing the FDIC insurance limit (which does nothing for most Americans anyway), give it a new name (“Rescue” instead of “Bailout”), and ram it down the American taxpayer’s throat again. Sadly, it just might work this time.

Posted by: jdoe | October 1, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Film and Television Productions – Wooden Arrows designed for use by children – Auto Racing Tracks – Wool Research…and this bill is going to save our economy?? This goes to show, you can be a well educated person, even a lawyer…and still be a total air-head. Say NO to this ignorance. No one who supports this garbage the way it is should be elected or re-elected.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | October 1, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

This is what happens when you have failed leadership. Nothing gets done. Bush should have saved his political capital for this instead of using it to try to expose social security to Wall Street greed and have everyone’s retirement stolen.

Posted by: rgkntulsa | October 1, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

VOTE NO ENCUMBENT-let’s fix this mess.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | October 1, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Thanks Stuart – well put. Anyone who thinks there is no connection between “Wall St.” and themselves is dead wrong. This is absolutely not about “bailing out ceo fatcats” as I’ve heard so many people blindly screaming. If credit markets fail, and banks don’t make loans we’re done for …all of us.

Posted by: I don't like it either | October 1, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I am amazed at how the real reason why this is all happening is not obvious to anyone with a 50 points or more IQ. It is all about OIL! When this did debacle really blew up, THIS YEAR, after a massive amounrt of speculators puled their money out of Wall Street proper to raise OIL to twice its price. Proof? Check out the financial markets of Germany, Italy, France, Russia, they are all struggling too! Do you know any american that has a loan with the Bank of Italy? NO, the money was taken out of USA because the dollar was getting weak. It was taken out to speculate on OIL. John Doe and Jane Doe started feeling the squeeze when it took $500 of gas a month. Then bread when to $3 a pound ’cause of transportation cost and agricultural lands been used to produce Ethanol. PEOPLE WAKE UP! W just wants more money in the markets so that the people that have made his family rich during the last 40 years can get even more filthy rich! Obama – if you fall for this I will certaintly not vote for you! Palin — chack who paid the scientists who told her it was OK to kill bears and wolves. McCain — prove to me your not in the Oil Industry’s pocket by calling this what it is!

Posted by: OPEN_YOUR_EYES | October 1, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

hey stuart..it will fix itself ,eventually. inaction will cause the resulting firestorm which will clear out the deadwood that IS the american financial system.
if theres a profit to be made at something, someone will find a way to make it work …THATS THE AMERICAN WAY,NOT TO GIVE OUT TRILLION DOLLAR LOANS WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY.
if the government seized the assets of the ceos (who made trillions ,duh i wonder why these banks dont have any assets now…hmmm might try checking some SWISS BANKS DOH!!!!) who presided over the banks and such that have failed ,or will fail soon, there would be MORE THAN ENOUGH to cover this problem. let them pay it back NOT the american taxpayer…thats RIDICULOUS!!!

Posted by: bah | October 1, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Citizens – Fight the Democrats tooth and nail!!! Oppose the bailout!! The Democrats are just trying to save face for creating this whole mess in the first place. Through regulation, they forced the banks to give loans to people that couldn’t afford to pay them. Now that their scheme has exploded, they are trying to get this bailout passed as a smokescreen. Fight them or your children will still be paying for this 30 years from now.

Posted by: Walter | October 1, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

I hate to say it, but Bob Bennett (R-UT) has the best statement on the bailout of anyone – pundit, journalist, presidential candidate…. Anyone who thinks this is only going to impact Wall Street hedge managers – and not every retiree in America, every student in America, every teacher in Amerca, everyone with a kid – is out of their minds. It’s going to hurt us all and it has been a long time coming. Go to his website. He’s dead right and he isn’t happy about it.

Posted by: mara | October 1, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

NO. We are now hearing nonsense that these securities are a fine investment that we will break even or make money on in just a few years. Leaving aside the fact that those dollars will be worth about 25% less at the level of debt this will require, if this were so wouldn’t someone VOLUNTARILY invest their own money? Clearly this is a theft of taxpayer money to artificially support credit markets that are riddled with overpriced capacity. So long as the “solution” is to prop up housing values that are too high through government tax-funded corporate welfare, it will be, at best, a delaying tactic to move the misery past the next election cycle. My senator has an opponent this time out and I’m voting for him unless he falls down drunk on TV. My Congressman’s unopposed unfortunately.

Posted by: dem-dog | October 1, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

These Senators that agree to this bill have not said one thing about how the $700 Billion Dollar Bailout will fix the problem.
They can’t!
The bill can only prolong the agony of the irresponsible practices, pouring fuel on the fire. The Senators have never created a real job in their lives, never run a successful business without using their position or influence. They have no idea what they are voting for. They have not consulted one economist that understands the proper corrections for the failures. A strong dollar and market prices is the only fix.
Let them know that they will be fired if they approve this bill that dooms America, for you, me and our children.
Tell them to vote NO on this bill.
Contact them now:

Posted by: CommonCents | October 1, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Sound businesses and people with good credit histories will still be able to borrow without this massive taxpayer-funded bailout. The strong companies will survive and the weak will fail and start over. Let the winnowing begin. NO bailout!

Posted by: Sofanerd | October 1, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

No Bailout. Not bailout. No bailout. No bailout.
Why can’t our elected “representatives” get that through their heads??????

Posted by: rosethornva | October 1, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

70 Senators are for this bailout. This Senate is not a Senate of a Republic it is an Imperial Senate, completely oblivious to the voice of the people and only listening to the Emperor and Oligarchs.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm


This is a REVOLUTION – haven’t you figured that out yet? We’re furious. I can’t find a single person in my neighborhood in support of this. However, I can find lots of people willing to yank congress by their hair right out of office in four weeks. Many people are keeping a list of who is voting for and against this travesty.
This IS a revolution… and we are not giving in this time. This is about our children and their future… and we’ll fight to the end for our kids!
NO BANKER BAILOUT!

Posted by: bruce strait | October 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

This goes from bad to worse. What happened to those dire predictions that the markets were going to seize up if Congress didn’t act last week? It didn’t happen. The market has moved up and down and credit is still flowing. I don’t buy it that we are courting catastrophe if we don’t bail out Wall St. Where is the evidence of that? I am not convinced and most Americans are not convinced. No bailouts.

Posted by: Bill | October 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

According to the news, Senate leaders agreed to add tax breaks and a higher limit for insured bank deposits in a bid to attract enough votes to reverse defeat in the House. Wow! Tax break to whom? The institution!! Higher limit for insured bank deposits for whom? Again for the rich!! They never think about the average hardworking American people!!!!

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Forget the fact that the democrats caused this mess, the most important thing now is to stop the democrats from pasing this bill. The Dems can be prosecuted later!!

Posted by: ynot | October 1, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

The bailout that is currently proposed seeks to have the government buy all of the subprime loans from the institutions that now own them. With what we now know about Obama’s involvement in the scheme to give loans to people that can not afford to pay them back, what do you think the government is going to do with all of those loans if Obama is elected? Do you think Obama is going to force all of those people to pay those loans? If they don’t pay the loans, do you think Obama is going to foreclose on them? Is Obama going to kick them out of the homes and resell the homes to get back some of the taxpayer’s money? If you believe any of that, than I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. Obama is going to either give them the homes outright as a sort of “mini-reparations” or he will convert the loans into longer term interest free loans. The taxpayers will never see the money again, the Wall Streeters will get to keep their fortunes and get their ’08 bonuses, and the people that should never have bought houses in the first place will be sitting pretty while the rest of us fools pay increased taxes to pay for it all.

Posted by: Saul | October 1, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

i hear about 80% no to the “bailout” some for all the wrong reason too.i am just hopeful it wont happen but amused to see the republican nonsupport for anything that will make them have less money.
(except for the ones who read the drudge report/fox news nonsense ,they have their sycophant script handed to them already)
this time having a cheapskate skinflint voter base is KILLING the republicans…
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!

Posted by: bah | October 1, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Bah, For the sake of crediblity.. please fact check before posting.

Posted by: David | October 1, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

An appeal to all the Senators: It is our ferveny hope, that you shall not betray the trust we put on you, and the voice that we have been trying to tell you in regards to the $700 billions taxpayers money bailout of the Wall Street. Please vote accordingly to your constituents voice.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 1, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Anyone who votes for this bill gets voted out of office.

Posted by: NO BAILOUT | October 1, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Many of you are complaining that the websites of your congressmen are down. Call your member or send an email

Posted by: Brian | October 1, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

They’ve just reported on the news most of the calls to Congress are in favor. It’s been rumored though there are phone banks of people calling Congress pretending to be voters.

Posted by: alan | October 1, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Citizens – Fight the Democrats tooth and nail!!! Oppose the bailout!! The Democrats are just trying to save face for creating this whole mess in the first place. Through regulation, they forced the banks to give loans to people that couldn’t afford to pay them. Now that their scheme has exploded, they are trying to get this bailout passed as a smokescreen. Fight them or your children will still be paying for this 30 years from now.

Posted by: Walter | October 1, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Libertarian U.S. Presidential candidate Bob Barr does not believe that the federal government should be ‘bailing out’ any quasi-government nor private sector business organization. He believes that allowing the ‘free market system to work’ will more firmly solve this economic problem. He believes that the Community Reinvestment Act is ‘bad legislation’ that needs to be overhauled. Finally, he believes that ‘any executive’ in these business organizations, who personally profited monetarily thru mismanagement, should be prosecuted!
Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain believe that these federal ‘bailouts’ should occur. They also believe that federal spending should increase in general. The National Taxpayers Union released a report on September 25th. It analyzes each of the three candidates in their ‘first year’ federal budget spending proposals as President. Barack Obama would ‘add’ $292,954,000,000 to annual spending! John McCain would ‘add’ $92,437,000,000 to annual spending! Bob Barr would ‘cut’ $200,928,000,000 from annual spending!!!

Posted by: Jack Gannon | October 1, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Walter it is all of congress that must not pass this bill.

Posted by: NO BAILOUT | October 1, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Are they trying to incite a riot among us? Do they want us to stampede the house and take over the government and put it back into the hands of WE THE PEOPLE? It sure looks like it.
This is a REVOLUTION… and they need to realize we’re not going to back down.
We have grown more than tired of being bullied and tricked into giving up our power and we have nothing left to lose at this point.
NO GD BANKER BAILOUT!

Posted by: evan thomas | October 1, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

This is a bailout from hell! . There has to be better “free market” solutions.We cannot let them ram this through.
The best ideas are coming from outside the two main parties. Bob Barr has been all over this from the start. He has some very good ideas for solutions.

Posted by: Texas T | October 1, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

sure David. im not credible. happy now?
WOOOOHOOO YOUR REPUBLICAN DAYS ARE NUMBERED…GET READY FOR SOME MAJOR BIG TIME TAXES !!! I CANT WAIT TO SPEND SOME OF YOUR NEW FOUND REPUBLICAN MONEY FOR A SHELTER FOR UNWED GERBILS!!! (among other useless liberal things on our liberal money wasting agenda)
GET READY FOR IT!! WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOO!!
now Davie lad, is that credible enough?
WOOOOOHOOOOOO STICK A FORK IN DAVE AND HIS REPUBLICAN BUDDIES!! ITS OVER!!

Posted by: bah | October 1, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

“If the house neocons break the agreement this time, they will be stuck with it as the economy collapses.”
The Democrats have the votes to pass it on their own.
Or, being afraid to take responsibility for it, they let it fail.
Which means Obama is a lame duck on day one with no support from his hedge fund supporters on Wall Street, reduced funding to ACORN, reduced funding to social engineering and so forth. After two years of that, the midterms will see a shift back to the right, and in four years, they pick back up the whole enchilada.
Pelosi should never have made that speech. Obama and the media should not have knifed Hillary Clinton.
The chickens!!! The chickens!!! Ah, the roostiness of it all.

Posted by: len | October 1, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

If Democrats keep voting ‘YES’ to the bailout bill against the voice of their constituents, they are surely going to lost many Congressional seats in this November election. Thus make the Republican majority. I have already marked 3 democrats who vote ‘YES’ in the last Congressional session. They will not be in my ballot this Nov 4, even though I’ll vote for Obama.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 1, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Bush just does not get it. NO one in their right mind wants to give the financial industry a free pass in the form of 700 billion dollars from the tax payers for their greedy and potentially criminal practices. It would not only condone their actions but encourage it in the future. their tinkering with the bill has made this bill even worse by providing the institutions with even more freedom. institutions are not the real victims. its the people. What bush is trying is BEYOND HIGH TREASON.
since the people are the victims they should receive the majority of the money in mortgage relief for those most effected. those who have held up should get smaller savings incentives in the form of RRSP’s. whats next is he going to start signing bills enabling the financial institutions to capture slaves for those who they caught after giving out massive amouts of money loans to those who could never repay them.

Posted by: ADAM | October 1, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

For those of you against the bailout…you amaze me with your short-sightedness. Something needs to be done now not a week from now or a month from now. I think everyone who is close to the problem agrees that problem is critical and requires urgent attention. Yet too many of you are simply willing to let everything go to hell. And your leaders that should know better are simply feeding that because they are scared if they don’t they won’t get re-elected. I have not seen one coherent alternative bill that has been proposed that addresses the problem. Doing nothing is not an option. Delays in action simply prolong the time it will take to dig out from the mess. Our elected leaders who know better should act instead of pandering to people and adding to fear in the markets…

Posted by: indy_voter | October 1, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Why are we complaining?
During 8 years of this administration, deficit went up by 5 trillion. That is over 600 billion a year. And that is not counting spending Social Security surplus. What is another trillion? And lets put ex CEO of Goldman Sachs in charge. I am sure White house, congress, senate, Wall Street have our best interests in mind. I am surprised that anyone still has any respect left for them.
But, if you are behind a few bucks on your taxes, IRS will put take your assets. Oh well, we have democracy! Lets spread more freedom around the world. After all every country should be just like us. Hail the freedom fries! Congress had nothing better to do then rename them and investigate steroid usage in Baseball! WHAT A JOKE!
VOTE THEM ALL OUT!

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

No matter what the average American wants, Congress is going to pass some form of this outrageous bill. So what I would like to ask each of the presidential candidates at the next debate is who are they intending to appointment to the position of Treasury Sect? Or are we stuck with the bald dude? However you slice it, he will be the most powerful person in DC.

Posted by: whatashame | October 1, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

John Boehner is right, this is a (huge) crap sandwich!
NO way, no how, not now, not ever, will I favor a bailout for the greedy rich. They all should go to jail!!!
McCain was right, “greed”, let the AIG, Fannie and Freddie take their lumps for 20 or 30 years in the slammer!
The government can help the Joe six-pack and the he!! with the crooks that started this mess.
If only the country would have listened to McCain back in 2005, there wouldn’t be a situation with the mortgages and banks!
McCain/Palin – Real Americans !!!

Posted by: Abe in FL | October 1, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Please put your politics aside for a moment and read the ECONOMICS lesson in the comment by Stuart. I, for one, have lived through some recessions, and I’m not interested in spending the next 5+ years living that way.
This isn’t about Wall Street or the rich folks. This is about keeping our small businesses open and our companies running and people employed and paying their bills.

Posted by: Been There | October 1, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

For 2 weeks now we’ve been told daily if we don’t do something today, financial armagedon will arrive tomorrow. Every day we get by though and the stock market isn’t plummeting 2,000 points as many have suggested. We are in a certainly in a financial mess, and things need to be done.
However, we must be smart in how we solve this mess, or we will only be doing this all over again in 5-10 years. Our so called leaders have now added to the bill to go before the Senate today. It includes funding for foreign banks and to name just a few:
New Tax earmarks in Bailout bill
- Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)
- Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)
- 6 page package of earmarks for litigants in the 1989 Exxon Valdez
incident, Alaska (Sec. 504)
Tax earmark “extenders” in the bailout bill
- Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)
- American Samoa (Sec. 309)
- Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)
- Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)
- Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)
- Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)
- Railroads (Sec. 316)
- Auto Racing Tracks (317)
- District of Columbia (Sec. 322)
- Wool Research (Sec. 325)
Take 1 minute and tell Congress to Vote NO on this bailout. It is time our leaders work on a real plan that truly solves this financial crisis for decades to come.

Posted by: Alan | October 1, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

I think the 2nd bill is a bigger joke than the first. Everything except for the increase FDIC limit..it’s full of corporate tax breaks and does little for the taxpayer. This is paramount to a BRIBE people!! THAT’s ALL IT IS!!

Posted by: Brent from ATX | October 1, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Years of bad decisions and stupid mistakes have created an economic nightmare in this country, but $700 billion in new debt is not the answer. As a tax-paying American citizen, I will not support any congressperson who votes to implement such a policy. Instead, I submit the following three steps:
Common Sense Plan.
I. INSURANCE
A. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity.
B. In order for a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things:
1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage.
a. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes.
b. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while
working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives.
2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps underperforming executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs.
C. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal.
II. MARK TO MARKET
A. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate.
B. This move creates patience in the market and has an immediate stabilizing effect on failing and ailing banks—and it costs the taxpayer nothing.
III. CAPITAL GAINS TAX
A. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing.
B. This move will be seen as a lightning rod politically because many will say it is helping the rich. The truth is the rich will benefit, but it will be their money that stimulates the economy. This will enable all Americans to have more stable jobs and retirement investments that go up instead of down. This is not a time for envy, and it’s not a time for politics. It’s time for all of us, as Americans, to
stand up, speak out, and fix this mess.

Posted by: Nikki | October 1, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

“Let the free market work!” Bob Barr.
The only one running for the white house that understands this is Bob Barr.

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

to indy_voter: We know something has to happen and soon. I do not think that is the issue. The issue is that Congress appears to want to help their friends and the ones who contributed to their campaigns, not the average American taxpayer who is going to have to pay this…like you.

Posted by: whatashame | October 1, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Boehner is right, this is another CRAP SANDWICH. This is the first time I have agreed with the republicans.
For $700 billion, it disgusting. I hope the republicans kill this CRAP bill and then they will earn my vote.

Posted by: Alan | October 1, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

No bail-Out why won’t they listen?
I will not vote for anyone that votes for this craziness! Even if that means I can’t vote for McCain, I will be looking at a new person or a write in!

Posted by: Jenny | October 1, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

“Let the free market work!” Bob Barr.
Barr is Right, the market will fix it’s self. If anything we should be voteing to stop the regulation.

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Whether you like him or not, email McCain, tell him to vote NO!

Posted by: Andrew | October 1, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“Let the free market work!” Bob Barr.
For all ofyou looking for some one new because Obama and McCain are for ballout please look into Bob Barr. Let free market fix itself, It can and will.

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

What is all of this crap about credit drying up if the bailout doesn’t go through. Not all banks are failing, just the ones that own a lot of bad paper. We first need to immediatly halt the Democrat program that forces banks to give loans to risky borrowers. Let the troubled institutions fail, like they should. Then provide funding for the surviving banks to lend to small businesses, families, etc. This drying up of credit argument sounds like a red herring.

Posted by: Sammy | October 1, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

The House is starting to see Americans don’t want this bailout. Why are Obama, and McCain still pushing it. The free market will fix it’s self.
The only one that knows all of this and has been against the Ballout from the beggening is BOB BARR.
“Barr is Right”

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

The Goverment is getting to Big and Powerful. Soon we won’t have anything at all.
Smalle Goverment, More Liberty
Vote BOB BARR 2008!

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

$700 billion? Well, there goes my reparations chek! Damn.

Posted by: Barrys Bro in a Hut | October 1, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

The bailout that is currently proposed seeks to have the government buy all of the subprime loans from the institutions that now own them. With what we now know about Obama’s involvement in the scheme to give loans to people that can not afford to pay them back, what do you think the government is going to do with all of those loans if Obama is elected? Do you think Obama is going to force all of those people to pay those loans? If they don’t pay the loans, do you think Obama is going to foreclose on them? Is Obama going to kick them out of the homes and resell the homes to get back some of the taxpayer’s money? If you believe any of that, than I have a bridge I’d like to sell you. Obama is going to either give them the homes outright as a sort of “mini-reparations” or he will convert the loans into longer term interest free loans. The taxpayers will never see the money again, the Wall Streeters will get to keep their fortunes and get their ’08 bonuses, and the people that should never have bought houses in the first place will be sitting pretty while the rest of us fools pay increased taxes to pay for it all.

Posted by: Saul | October 1, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

stuart, you may as well be speaking to the wall. most americans only hear soundbites, and the only economics they understand is what’s in their wallets. they really don’t have a clue about how the system interacts to help put that money in their wallets. in a way, it’s sort of like someone on the 2nd floor getting mad because the fire department has sprayed water into their windows in trying to put out the fire on the first floor. I hope this second attempt succeeds; then we’ve bought some *intelligent* time to restructure with regulatory oversight and put things back into perspective.

Posted by: bajacalla | October 1, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

McCain and Obama are makeing the Goverment Bigger then ever before.
Stop the spending and take overs.
Vote Barr

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

do not think anyone here fully understands what this is for. This is not a Wall Street Bail out but a rescue plan for the US credit. It should have never been called a Wall Street Bailout. If the credit is not fixed soon no one will be able to get loans for anything. No home loans, no car loans, no student loans, and no loans for business. If businesses don’t get loans then no jobs for you and me. The economy then collapses and everybody suffers.This is not a Bail Out but a Credit Rescue.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

We need to let Washington know that if they vote yes to any bailout bill, we will make certain that none of them are re-elected in their next election campaigns. We also will not vote for either Presidential candidate that votes yes for ANY bailout bill.

Posted by: Susan Meszaros | October 1, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Nicholas, this is a discussion of our economic future, not a Bob Barr rally. 6 posts in 15 minutes? C’mon man..

Posted by: I don't like it either | October 1, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

It looks like these %&#$@*^$% in Washington are going to do what they darn please regardless of what the American people think….seriously, they really DON’T CARE!

Posted by: Steven H. | October 1, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Many of you are complaining that the websites of your congressmen are down. Call your member or send an email

Posted by: Brian | October 1, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

3. “Controlling government spending is a necessary step to enact true tax reform, which will reduce the burden on all Americans and allow them to keep more of their hard-earned money.” This is what a Bob Barr administration wants to do for you. Will you let them?
http://www.BobBarr2008.com

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Odd how so many tax paying people feel we should just go blindly and hand Wall St. 700 billion dollars. Keep in mind people who’s raising this red herring, Mr. Bush, the same person that ranted and raved about Iraq’s nuclear might. The other person injecting fear is none other then a Goldman Sachs rich fat cat!!!! Of course Paulson is crying out for this bail out, him and his high stake friend created this mess, so now he must bail out his buddies, if he wants to call himself a true friend…
As for the Democrats giving in so easy to Mr. Bush’s desires, WHAT IS GOING ON!!! I say to the voting public, take names my friends; it’s time to vote out any person voting for this hand out. If you ever find your community lacking anything even something as little as a traffic light, remember your government won’t give money for that, but forking over 700 billion dollars to wealthy companies is never an issue…

Posted by: Concern Tax Payer | October 1, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

“Controlling government spending is a necessary step to enact true tax reform, which will reduce the burden on all Americans and allow them to keep more of their hard-earned money.” This is what a Bob Barr administration wants to do for you. Will you let them?
Stop the ballout! Call your Congressmen and tell them to vote NO!!

Posted by: Nicholas | October 1, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

End the duopoly of the republicrats and democans True change comes from new ideas, not failed policy. Vote Bob Barr Nov. 4.
Bob Barr For President
http://www.bobbarr2008.com

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I do not think anyone here fully understands what this is for. This is not a Wall Street Bail out but a rescue plan for the US credit. It should have never been call a Wall Street Bailout. If the credit is not fixed soon no one will be able to get loans for anything. No home loans, no car loans, no student loans, and no loans for business. If businesses don’t get loans then no jobs for you and me. The economy then collapses and everybody suffers.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

SAVE AMERICA. Our Senators are going to vote tonight on this massive bailout plan, and according to the news today, they are going to vote YES to saddle us, the American people, with this massive debt. This will send our dollar plummeting, and the last time the dollar fell, gas prices went through the roof. Can you continue to pay up to $10.00 a gallon for gas, and have it not effect your way of life? It is now up to us to save America, because Congress and the President do not have the backbone to do it. IF YOU, AS AN AMERICAN, HAVE NEVER DEFENDED YOUR COUNTRY, NOW IS THE TIME. THIS BAILOUT WILL DESTROY THE FUTURE FOR OUR CHILDREN IF OUR COUNTRY CAN EVEN SURVIVE THIS ADDITIONAL DEBT PILED ON TO THE MASSIVE DEBT WE ALREADY HAVE. Call your Senator. Don’t ask them to vote NO. INSIST that they vote NO. THEY MUST HEAR FROM THOUSANDS OF US OR THEY WILL CONTINUE TO IGNORE US.
There are alternative plans to this bill that are fiscally responsible – one that I hear of is Sen. DeMint’s of SC. Go to his website and check it out, and see the difference in the two proposals. It’s time to stop being Republicans and Democrats, and start being Americans because we, the people, are the only hope left.

Posted by: tiaa | October 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Bob Barr is everything that is right in this country. People that are
willing to move forward in getting another voice in the debates and the White
House, please look into Libertarian candidate Bob Barr. Many have said that a vote
for Barr is a wasted vote, but this is just not true. If the Libertarians just get
5% of the vote, they will then receive millions of dollars in funding for 2012
(which only (R) and (D) get) and will also achieved ballot status in all 50
States! Now to me getting another voice in Government, other than the same-old out
of tune voice, into office in 4 years is very important step to changing our
government. Just remember there are more the two opinions out there in America and
there are still only two political parties in power.

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Why won’t they lisen to American. We don’t want this. That is why I looked into Bob Barr like Nicholas said, and now voteing for BOB BARR.
Please go look also.

Posted by: Stop the Ballout | October 1, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Barr is the only way after visting his site.
I will be voteing Barr on Nov 4th!

Posted by: Break the Matrixs | October 1, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I do not think anyone here fully understands what this is for. This is not a Wall Street Bail out but a rescue plan for the US credit. It should have never been call a Wall Street Bailout. If the credit is not fixed soon no one will be able to get loans for anything. No home loans, no car loans, no student loans, and no loans for business. If businesses don’t get loans then no jobs for you and me. The economy then collapses and everybody suffers.
Posted by: vakcmo | Oct 1, 2008 4:58:21 PM
We will only suffer more if this BAIL OUT passes The Market needs to run its course…it will work itself out

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Get Barr into the Deabtes. After the last lame on an now the Bailout we need to hear another voice. There are more then just 2 sides people.

Posted by: Stephen | October 1, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Let the free market work like Nicolas said.
Look into Barr!!! He is the only way to go.

Posted by: KoolAideMan | October 1, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Here is what the Libertarian candidate Bob Barr wants to do for you. He
wants to make your taxes fit on to a post card! Please look into Mr. Barr’s ideas
to help the America people not the government.

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

vakcmo…You are correct in one sense – the banking/credit situation needs to be rescued to ensure individuals and businesses can continue to operate (car loans, student loans, payroll, etc. all depend upon what occurs in the future). HOWEVER, the problem is that the is not focusing on just this – they are looking to take a $700 Billion blank check (and in the first rendition, packed with EARMARKS!). That is what Americans and conservative Republicans and Democrats have opposed.

Posted by: RUKiddingMe?? | October 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Charlie,
Have you tried getting a loan lately? Do you think you will need a loan soon. Well if this does not pass you will not get a loan. Business need to borrow money to operate. If Businesses don’t get money to operate they lay people off or go out of business.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Let Freedom and Free Market be people.
Congress got us into the mess. Why sould we trust them now. Screw the (D) and (R!!!
Vote for the Libertarians, Both for the Whhite House and local goverments.
Go Barr!!!!

Posted by: LibertyFighter | October 1, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

“Controlling government spending is a necessary step to enact true tax reform, which will reduce the burden on all Americans and allow them to keep more of their hard-earned money.” This is what a Bob Barr administration wants to do
for you. Will you let them?

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The Republicans and Democrats got us in this big problem. What makes us think they can get us out. Vote for Liberty vte Barr and other LIBERTARIANS into office!!

Posted by: Hillman | October 1, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

vakcmo,
No i haven’t, but i live within my means, unlike our government. If i do not have the cash on hand i do not need an item. These BAIL OUTS will do nothing morre than pad the pockets of the already wealthy

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Hilman, you speak the truth

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Charlie,
It must be nice being rich and not need to borow money to buy a car or a house.But the rest of us need credit to live.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

just heard Obama in the Senate… More wealth redistribution from this idiot! Talk about 700 billion….try 2 trillion!!!

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

vacmo…If you have to live on credit then you are living beyond your means…try restaints!! Don’t buy want you cannot afford! That is how you survive and live a peaceful life!!!

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Charlie, How did you pay for your house, car, schooling.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

vakcmo,
No not rich i just manage my money, my wife and i combined make less than $50,000 a year. Have a mortgage, but no car payments, save money and you do not need loans…except for maybe the purchase of a house

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

vakcmo,
Proper money management, What wall street cannot do

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

mfmros,
Words of wisdom

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I own a company and I do not have to borrow money for payroll…what kind of company is THAT insolvent that it cannot make payroll???

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Charlie, So you needed a loan to buy your house. What if you could’nt get a loan to buy your house. Live on the street.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I would still be renting

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Charlie, How did the people you rent from buy the complex or house? Most likey they got a loan.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 1, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

vakcmo,
These Businesses made their own bed…I say let them lay in it

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

THIS POST by Nikki HAS PROMISE:
“Years of bad decisions and stupid mistakes have created an economic nightmare in this country, but $700 billion in new debt is not the answer. As a tax-paying American citizen, I will not support any congressperson who votes to implement such a policy. Instead, I submit the following three steps:
Common Sense Plan.
I. INSURANCE
A. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity.
B. In order for a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things:
1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage.
a. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes.
b. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while
working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives.
2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps underperforming executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs.
C. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal.
II. MARK TO MARKET
A. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate.
B. This move creates patience in the market and has an immediate stabilizing effect on failing and ailing banks—and it costs the taxpayer nothing.
III. CAPITAL GAINS TAX
A. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing.
B. This move will be seen as a lightning rod politically because many will say it is helping the rich. The truth is the rich will benefit, but it will be their money that stimulates the economy. This will enable all Americans to have more stable jobs and retirement investments that go up instead of down. This is not a time for envy, and it’s not a time for politics. It’s time for all of us, as Americans, to
stand up, speak out, and fix this mess.
Posted by: Nikki | Oct 1, 2008 4:36:38 PM”
The above post is a good starting point for a meaningful discussion of potential solutions. (Another approach might be to take your proposal and add to it by amending the bankruptcy laws to give bankruptcy courts “cramdown” powers to adjust mortgages to current property FMVs. You’d have to go to bankruptcy for relief; the relief could be tailored to the individual financial circumstances of the borrowers, the local real estate market, and end with realistic workout solutions that bankruptcy courts have lots of experience with already.)
The main caveat in your proposal I see is to limit the time and/or circumstances under which the capital gains taxes would be totally removed. You are giving mark to market limitations; do something similar in reguards to the capital gains part of the equation.

Posted by: boydatty | October 1, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

vakcmo,
Support the bail out if you want…IT IS A BAD IDEA. If you have to borrow money to survive…you will not survive long…Payments do come due and if you can not pay them it is end game

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

mfmros,
wall street could take a lesson from you

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Why do the politicians and Wall St keep refering to “assets” in the bailout when they are actually buying “liabilities”?

Posted by: solarbuster | October 1, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I have called..emailed…faxed…guess what…the elves have shut down the systems??? emails don’t go thru…voice mail boxes full…how convenient!!! No bailout!!!!

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

By Oct. 15th the small business owners will see the devistation wrought on by big business. By Nov. all America will be ready to vote for no emcumbent and we can begin the cleansing of Washington. In two years during mid-term elections we can vote everyone out. We couldn’t be much worse than a bunch of money grubbing undecisive “crap sandwich” makers.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | October 1, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I hope the bailout plan fails again. I think the best thing for the house and the senate to do would be to sign a bill that would send the money to the taxpayers, not the banks or the companies in the stock market. If they would send the money to us most of us would use the money to pay off our mortgages and credit card bills. That would get the banks solvent again and would get us, the taxpayers, out from under our burdens of debt. That seems like the best and only sensible thing to do to me.

Posted by: carlyonsue | October 1, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Charlie…my biggest asset is my honesty…can you find any of those assets in Washington…no…just a bunch of theives looking to line their pockets and strip us of our finances!! We need to stop being their whipping posts everytime they steal and ruin a business..hell, the Senate opened a cafeteria in the Senate and it went belly up too…if they can’t even run a meal table, how the hell can they be trusted with 700B or more!!!

Posted by: mfmros | October 1, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

mfmros,
That is the reason we need Bob Barr in the debates…So America can see that there is a BETTER option for President

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

These folks can ONLY make things WORSE. If this passes, go back and the the house to KILL IT ONCE AND FOR ALL!!! ENOUGH! STOP privatizing profits and socializing LOSSES!!! ENOUGH! Call/write them NOW!!!

Posted by: hmn | October 1, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

well, Is the US more communism than China?

Posted by: anthony | October 1, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

You want real change? Try never voting for the incumbent. Better yet,ntake it one step farther, try never voting for either one of the two major parties. The Democrats and Republicans have had more than enough time to get things right. They are both far to corrupt to be salvaged. If after this fiasco, the citizens of this country don’t rise up and kick both these two bands of pirates to the curb, we deserve exactly what we are going to have done to us.

Posted by: Real Change. | October 1, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

antony,
Not Yet But our leadership is trying hard oh so very hard

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

It’s always interesting to listen to people, many of whom were happy to take on ever increasing debt, buy homes and stocks that had already doubled or tripled and now act like they have no part in the current problems. If this bill goes down to defeat, I suggest you read up on the Great Depression, because that is where we’re going. The pain will be beyond anything this country has gone through in at least 80 years. Unemployment was 25% during that time and you can expect similar results in this case.

Posted by: bby | October 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Is anyone investigating Obama’s ties to ACORN? The following information is condensed from an article by Stanley Kurtz. O’s Dangerous Pals.Fannie and Freddie acted in response to Clinton administration pressure to boost homeownership rates among minorities and the poor. However compassionate the motive, the result of this systematic disregard for normal credit standards has been financial disaster. ONE key pioneer of ACORN’s subprime-loan shakedown racket was Madeline Talbott – an activist with extensive ties to Barack Obama. She was also in on the ground floor of the disastrous turn in Fannie Mae’s mortgage policies.Obama Trains ACORN Staff in Shakedown Tactics: It would be tough to find an “on the ground” community organizer more closely tied to the subprime-mortgage fiasco than Madeline Talbott. And no one has been more supportive of Madeline Talbott than Barack Obama. When Obama was just a budding community organizer in Chicago, Talbott was so impressed that she asked him to train her personal staff. He returned to Chicago in the early ’90s, just as Talbott was starting her pressure campaign on local banks. In those years, he also conducted leadership-training seminars for ACORN’s up-and-coming organizers. That is, Obama was training the army of ACORN organizers who participated in Madeline Talbott’s drive against Chicago’s banks. More than that, Obama was funding them. As he rose to a leadership role at Chicago’s Woods Fund, he became the most powerful voice on the foundation’s board for supporting ACORN and other community organizers. In 1995, the Woods Fund substantially expanded its funding of community organizers – and Obama chaired the committee that urged and managed the shift.

Posted by: prm | October 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

NIKKI has a good idea. Let’s take time and get this right. In business we have always said look at it good a minimum of three times before making a decision. Are the representatives and Senators looking toward the future not just the present bailout – Think! about it!

Posted by: Babe | October 1, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

You know what I find interesting about Jake’s column? He did not mention that one politician said, “Well, the majority of the voters I represent want __________ (fill in the blank).” No, this is all about what THEY, the political parties, want.
Who the heck cares about tax extenders? And God bless the person that will benefit from the FDIC insurance raised to $250,000.00. That’s not my world.
These people do not serve us the voters.
My suggestion would be to have those Blue Dogs spin off into a party of their own. Call it the Blue Dog Party and let’s start to get alternate representation in this country. Somebody that will represent that average American who works, pays their bills, doesn’t overextend and generally minds their own business. I bet you that a party like that would take off like a rocket.

Posted by: mak | October 1, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

real change,
I agree, That is why i am voting for Bob Barr this year. Smaller Gov., Lower Taxes, More Freedom

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

What is McGimmick going to try next?
Anyone got any fun ideas?
What a laughing-stock, wimp of a candidate.

Posted by: billy smith | October 1, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Wayyyy ahead of ya on that Charlie. If only more people in this country would wake up and realize that there is an alternative that make so much more sense. Even if you don’t agree 100% down the line in exactly every way, so what? Who of those supporting either one of the two major “pirate” parties actually agrees with everthing they say either? The point being, there are common sense alternatives just begging to be given a chance to offer this country some long forgotten “honest” politicing. This country has adopted the definition of insanity as it’s motto. “Keep doing the same things over and over, expecting different results. You want real change? Then go get it.

Posted by: Real Change. | October 1, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

test

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Well it has been Real Everyone take care and vote for Barr in Nov.
Click my name check out his platform…you won’t be sorry you did

Posted by: Charlie | October 1, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

For all his talk, what exactly has Obama done – as in actual work – on the bailout. In an interview with ABC News, he said he’d talked with Bush, Pelosi and Reid, emphasizing that something had to be done. Duh!
When the Self-Proclaimed Uniter was asked if he’d talked with any Republicans he said, “I don’t think me calling House Republican members would have been that helpful, I tend not to be that persuasive on that side of the aisle.”

Posted by: marylou | October 1, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Anybody who missed Senator Bernie Sanders (NOT to be confused with Bernie Frank!) speaking against the bailout in the Senate missed the best speech to come out of Congress in many a year.
Senator Sanders was soon followed, alas, by Senator Schumer, who introduced HIS apparently-interminable remarks, which are still going on, with a rather smarmy campaign plug for the Democratic nominee.
Maybe the “Democratic” and Republican nominees could just step down — and let us elect Senator Sanders (Independent!), by acclamation, as president.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Bailout Blues Cafe
Crap sandwich and Congress pie
Open til’ midnight.

Posted by: Kate DePriest | October 1, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

I am not sure whether or not we should be contributing to the BCRF, Bad CEO Retirement Fund! However, if the Dems can get Nancy Pelosi to shut her gargantuan sized pie hole for just a few
minutes before the vote this time, they may actually get it to pass. She single handedly sabatoged that vote with her pathetic attack on the Republicans. But at least she is still able to pay her husbands business with her PAC funds! Such a hypocrit!

Posted by: Jack | October 1, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Belle Star, What’s the difference between Sanders and Obama? They’re both socialists, only Obama’s voting record is further left.

Posted by: Bob | October 1, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

These Senators are using the bush tactic, FEAR. You’ll lose your job, home, ability to get an education, etc.
What they don’t say is this plan simply does not work. This is what does work.
Protecting Main Street requires the market to determine prices.
The Fed’s manipulation of rates and credit got us into this mess, Wall Street swallowed hook, line and sinker. You both failed us. Allow the market to correct the prices. The proposed bailouts only prolong the agony and lay the responsibility on our kids and grand kids.
To my Congressmen and women, I will never vote to re-elect an irresponsible representative that agrees to bail out a failed entity like the Wall Street thieves.
Ron Paul is the only Congressman that understands how both the market and the government should work. Using Austrian Free Market Economics philosophy we can return to being a great, well respected county.
Successful businesses will get the cash they need, failed businesses will not. Let the market fix the problems, quit messing with the market.
Vote No or get FIRED.

Posted by: CommonCents | October 1, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Why should I help the people that went and made bad chocies. The people that played with their money got burnned, why sould I get burnned too!!!
I say let the market work, stop restricting it!!!
Vote Barr

Posted by: Hillman | October 1, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Citizens – Fight the Democrats tooth and nail!!! Oppose the bailout!! The Democrats are just trying to save face for creating this whole mess in the first place. Through regulation, they forced the banks to give loans to people that couldn’t afford to pay them. Now that their scheme has exploded, they are trying to get this bailout passed as a smokescreen. Fight them or your children will still be paying for this 30 years from now.

Posted by: Walter | October 1, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Boy these people have the most creative ways to take our money for things that usualy go wrong and end up costing more money, or worse peoples lives. I checked out those Libertarians awhile ago and I am sold. As a veteran I see their position as the closest to what this great nation was supposed to be, and voting libertarian is now the best way for me to honor my oath of service.
A vote for Bob Barr is a vote of the ppeople, by the people, of the people, avote any other way is for the bankers.

Posted by: GMSilvia | October 1, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

If the Senate votes for the Bailout, I will most deffenity be voteing for Barr this Nov 4th 100%.
I am still in the middel for Barr and Obama but I can’t take this bs anymore!
look up barr

Posted by: Winnie | October 1, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Now I know why Bush has a ‘secret’ army unit standing by to be used as a police force in case of ‘national emergencies’….. posse comitatus be damned…. they knew this crisis was going to happen, hell, they might have even planned it..
you want change? march on Washington

Posted by: The Real Patriot | October 1, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

You know what I just may march on D.C!!!
We need to show them that we won’t take iit anyone, we need to get mad, were not going to take it any more!!!
We need a Third Voice in Gov.
Vote for a Third party!!
BARR is the best and has the best chance of winning!!!

Posted by: Jack .M | October 1, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

We need to return to our touch stone, the Constitution, this country is way out of balance. Bring back the values that built this nation, check out Bob Barr, it is time for logic to rule the day, not fear and taxes.

Posted by: GMSilvia | October 1, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I would like to know where the government thinks us tax payers are going to come up w/ extra money to pay higher taxes, when people are having a hard time paying their bills to start with, which has to be ATLEAST part of the reason companies are going under?

Posted by: Jamie | October 1, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

BO voted ‘present’ once again – he was no help. He is an empty suit, and will tax and spend America into a 3rd World Country status!
YOU PEOPLE WHO ARE VOTING FOR THIS MAN ARE AS INSANE AS HE IS…..

Posted by: Beckie | October 1, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

“you want change? march on Washington”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

The best thing would be to replace Pelosi, and substitute Sanders — by acclimation — as president, instead of heading toward a civil war with the “Democratic” or Republican presidential entrants, who have extensive matched sets of corporate skeletons.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

“acclimation”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Chrysler might be on the block – possibly being sold to Nissan.
Auto dealerships are floundering now.
As people struggle to pay their mortgages and provide basic needs for their families, they will not be buying automobiles at the rate they did last year. Whether or not the credit supply is opened up a bit will not increase automobile sales, people need to be able to afford financing another vehicle. A bailout of the financial institutions WILL NOT solve this problem.
The people MUST have mortgage relief. Inflation must be brought under control. This will not happen with a $700B bailout – or whatever folks want to call it to make it sound good!
THIS BAILOUT BILL IS A TOTAL SHAM AND MUST BE STOPPED!
Increasing the debt by $6K per citizen or $25K PER TAXPAYER will not introduce more disposable income to the family. David Kucinich had the right plan, fix the mortgage industry so that homes are not foreclosed upon and seized by the banks. This only drives everyone else’s property values down while increasing bank debt and future loan rates. It’s cheaper to save a house from foreclosure and does not cause traumatic damage to the families involved.
There were also a couple of foreign countries, facing this same problem, who fixed with without a bailout or increased debt to its citizens. This was on Lou Dobbs Money Line yesterday!
Obama or McCain – Have the stones to stop this bill, BECAUSE IT STINKS ON ICE!

Posted by: Wayne | October 1, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

This bill IS A SHAM! Oppose it at all costs!
It is a giant land grab by several institutions, especially Goldman Sachs! Just as NJ’s governor, who is a former Goldman CEO, the Treasury head is former Goldman. Guess who is the main benefactor of this deal… you got it. Goldman! NJ’s governor, Jon Corzine, and the NJ government over the past several years have directly benefitted Goldman Sachs. It’s a running joke in NJ that Goldman seems to be the ONLY lending institution in the country. FORMER GOLDMAN PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF GOLDMAN… PERIOD!
Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) is 100% correct on this problem. If the problem is bad mortgage debt, then the problem should be solved from the BOTTOM UP! Just like how Obama wants to correct the economy and help the middle-class by starting from the BOTTOM UP! If Goldman wasn’t getting any money from this deal, I might think that it has a bit of legitimacy to it. But Goldman seems to be the main beneficiary of this plan.
Floating money from the TOP DOWN WILL NOT correct this problem – THE BAD MORTGAGES WILL STILL EXIST! Fix the bad mortgages – Stop the foreclosures – Save the people’s homes. If the big institutions are complaining about the bad mortgages, How can they complain if the bad mortgages are addressed? DO NOT GIVE THEM THE MONEY DIRECTLY!
THIS IS A LAND GRAB AT THE EXPENSE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!

Posted by: Wayne | October 1, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

I do not support a bailout for banks or “struggling” homeowners.
After discussing this with my parents and brother, they ALSO don’t agree on a bailout.
People who made inappropriate decisions should suffer the consequences.
Putting our country in debt and adding a tax cut on top is completely irresponsible. It is decisions like this that have put us in the situation we are in. To top it off, there is not one shred of proof that this will even work!!!
By giving banks cash, you encourage them to loan money (again) to irresponsible individuals. By bailing out struggling homeowners, you are rewarding people for making poor financial decisions and you are inflating home prices until these people screw up again…so you are dragging out the home foreclosure problem.
I know some people say that the government will make its money back…this is unrealistic. If this was such a good deal than why aren’t investors jumping at the opportunity to help??? Because they know that this is a money losing proposition.
Stop rewarding people who do things wrong.
People who were smart enough NOT to overpay for a house or NOT take out loans they couldn’t afford…are the people getting screwed here. So you PUNISH responsible people but reward irresponsible people.
And people wonder WHY America is heading in the wrong direction. Stop trying to buy votes and do what is best for the country. By having limited credit, only the strong will survive and this is good for America.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“So in short, yes Belle. I believe you. You were a Hillary supporter who is not supporting Obama. There are many, many like you …”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

“only the strong will survive and this is good for America.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The real crap sandwich is that we are bailing out the Chinese, Arab, and European investors who are holding that bad paper.
That bad paper is the direct result of the democrat party ruining the economy and people’s lives by insisting that banks give loans to people who cannot re-pay them.

Posted by: lately | October 1, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

The real crap sandwich is that we are bailing out the Chinese, Arab, and European investors who are holding that bad paper.
That bad paper is the direct result of the democrat party ruining the economy and people’s lives by insisting that banks give loans to people who cannot re-pay them.

Posted by: lately | October 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

NO WAY should the bailout pass! The fat cats who ran this country into the ground have seen this crisis coming for a LONG time, so I suggest we let THEM (The extremely overpaid C.E.O.s and those who aided their greed with huge tax cuts and ‘tax extenders’) be the ones to FIX IT.
The Fed already sank $630 billion into the international market on Monday, and guess what? The stocks STILL plummeted. And they think another $700 billion is going to do any better? I doubt it.
That money is OUR MONEY. TAXPAYER money which we WORKED HARD FOR. Those of us who work hard every day, and STILL have problems making ends meet; those of us living paycheck to paycheck because of the rising cost of gas, food, because of inflation that doesn’t keep up with wage increases or cost-of-living adjustments…those of us who pay our bills on time and are RESPONSIBLE should NOT BE THE ONES TO SHOULDER THIS PROBLEM!!
How about the C.E.O.s PAY for the “bail out”???? How about those people who can actually AFFORD it take some responsibility like ADULTS and accept accountability for their irresponsible actions?!
I think marching on Washington is a GREAT idea! We have to be willing to show them that it’s WE THE PEOPLE, and they work for US, not the other way around!!

Posted by: Corina | October 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Hank Paulsen has consulted with China and others for years. Where do you think he has is $700M invested?

Posted by: lately | October 1, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

NO BAIL OUT PERIOD !!!!
Why can’t the politicians understand this, especially since there’s no guarantee this will work and these firms continue to be so secretive about the actual situation they are in. America has an economy of 13-14 trillion dollars, there is plenty of money to be made ( by honest bankers and the such )surely they will step up to the plate and fill the gap once these greedy incompetent gamblers are forced out of business. Then if necessary the gov’t can take it’s time go thru the records and see who was really cheated and perhaps offer some sort of compensation to individual citizens. However no one should be fully compensated so that we as citizens will learn not to continue to vote for shady policians and then stick our heads in the sand while allowing them to be bribed into doing the biding of big business and the wealthy.

Posted by: fool me once | October 1, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

“I think marching on Washington is a GREAT idea!”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Idiots who made bad loans to either give them or take them…should dig their own ways out. The rest of us shouldn’t be forced to pay for idiots. Tighten the lending standards, change the Mark to Market, and do not bail out…at most make loans to the credit worthy only.

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

The Senate just pass their version of the bill————nasty.

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Senate just past their version of the bill………………………get your pitchforks ready.

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Okay Senators, Congressmen … here is the deal. You vote for a bailout I vote against you in the election. What part of that don’t you understand?

Posted by: Todd Loren Sinclair | October 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Freddie, Fannie, Raines, Johnson, ACORN, CRE all caused this———–and guess who all ties into these people and corrupt groups——-OBAMA. Voting for Obama is voting to bail out again……………..

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

The republicans warned and tried to stop this mess——————–but the demmies fought it back. Thanks demmies, thanks Obama for screwing America again.

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Fannie and Freddie were donating big to Obama, Dodd, Pelosi so these idiots ran interference anything anyone wanted to stop Fannie and Freddie from killing us. Stupid, very stupid.

Posted by: chattyway | October 1, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

wow if we dont come up with billions wall street will have problems–what are we the bottomless bank—i do not approve this bailout due to incompetence.this country is big business and we are the pennies that feed it.

Posted by: rodney | October 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

guess we know now who our leaders represent–big business all the way—–get ready gang they are going to throw us a few crumbs—-vote out all that have done this to us.

Posted by: rodney | October 1, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

chattaway—you hero mccain has been trying to influence this vote from the beginning–he is for it–along with obama—THE MIDDLE CLASS TAKES ANOTHER BEATING.

Posted by: rodney | October 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

ECONOMIC DISASTER—FOR WHO? WE THE WORKING STIFFS—-OR THE BIG MONEY BOYS WITH THERE WALL ST INVESTMENTS—-DO THEY THINK WE ARE ALL THAT DUMB–MCCAIN IS FRANTIC -HE COULD LOSE A PILE OF MONEY–AND THEY HAVE THE GUTS TO TELL US IT IS FOR US—NO WAY NO HOW

Posted by: rodney | October 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

If you have a 401K, drop your contribution % in response to this Washington / Wall Street bailout. Enough is enough! The same people that caused this problem, are now going to solve it?? …and they’ll say the government is going to make money on the $700B…right, since when did the government ever make money on anything. Dodd being celebrated after the vote? Are they crazy? This guy should be in jail…and Mitch McConnell snickering along. I hope he’s voted out in November. Power to the people, enough is enough! Let DC and Wall Street eat beans and franks for once.

Posted by: MainStUSA1 | October 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“”I think marching on Washington is a GREAT idea!”

Posted by: Corina | October 2, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

found this:
“a 2007 report by the Mortgage Bankers Association reports that the FBI estimates “80 percent of all reported fraud losses arise from fraud for profit schemes that involve industry insiders.”
That means the lenders, not the borrowers.”
Mission Accomplished

Posted by: Rex | October 2, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

If this were Canada, parliament (congress) would have been dissolved, and new elections called for–repeat as necessary until the bums have been removed and the people have a say.
Judging from the “most popular” links at ABCNews (celebrity nonsense) I figure the scrip-popping, laff-track crowd will forget about this as soon as the media starts reporting something else. How sad.
I am defecting to Canada: better beer, better health care, and the chance of a decent pension when you retire.
To hell with the corrupt Empire, to hell with it’s ruling elite, to hell with it’s non-representative government, and to hell with it’s celebri-trash “weapons of mass distraction.”

Posted by: Heather | October 2, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

One thing I don’t see mentioned much in here is the fact that a Congressional bailout of private enterprise, whether $700 Billion or just $70, is against the Highest Law of this country, our Constitution.
It is actually a CRIME to vote for this bill – a violation of Article II Section 8 and Amendments 9 and 10.
So as much as some of the commenters here feel it really is needed, the bailout bill is, by legal definition, a criminal enterprise and every congressman SHOULD be voting no, in keeping with his or her oath to uphold the Constitution.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am

Vote No for the $700 billion bailout! Give us a bigger Stimulous check.

Posted by: Demo Rules | October 2, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Democracy was dealt a serious blow last night. 94% of the American citizens are opposed to this bill and the Senators who we voted in by us, voted for people who should be put into prison. It is obvious Senator McCain and Senator Obama can not be trusted as neither voted for the people of this country. We CAN NOT allow this bill pass the house of Representatives.

Posted by: John | October 2, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

180 million for tax breaks to make rum in puerto rico——who would the boose business help——the mccains and the multi million dollar distribution of boose—-no wonder the old geser is so concerned.he wants a piece of the pie we are going to pay for.

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

this bailout is a bunch of bs—and the pocket stuffers are standing in line——if any of my local people vote for it i will work very hard to make sure they pay next electon—and i am letting them know it.yes gang the rich are in controll and we are the fools that feed them——NO BAILOUT

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

WHY WOULD WE EXTEND UNEMPLOYMENT BENIFITS——-MCCAIN SAYS WE ARE LIVING IN AN ERA OF PROSPERITY DUE TO NAFTA—–N-O—–B-A-I-L-O-U-T

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

ABC YOU NEED TO RESTART THIS BLOG AND GET IT ON THE FRONT BURNER————————–THE PEOPLE NEED TO BE HEARD–

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

One thing I don’t see mentioned much in here is the fact that a Congressional bailout of private enterprise, whether $700 Billion or just $70, is against the Highest Law of this country, our Constitution.
It is actually a CRIME to vote for this bill – a violation of Article II Section 8 and Amendments 9 and 10.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

CHECK……CHECK PLEASE!!!

Posted by: commrat72 | October 2, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.