Oct 6, 2008 7:06pm

An Unoriginal Question About William Ayers

Chicago Tribune columnist Steve Chapman in the New York Times said the following: "If John McCain had a long association with a guy who’d bombed abortion clinics, I don’t think people would say, ‘That’s ancient history.’ "

Another jump ball for discussion purposes:

What if McCain had launched his political career in the living room of a former abortion clinic bomber who is now a respected professor at, say, a Christian college, who is unrepentant in his previous actions, but never charged with a crime, and was now pursuing a different avenue for his views…

And what if he’d given McCain a $200 campaign contribution eight years ago, and they’d served on a board together, and were "friendly" though they hadn’t spoken in a while, and McCain had condemned his previous actions and didn’t know him back then…

And what if right now McCain were ahead with a Republican wind blowing, and Obama were behind.

And what if Obama started attacking McCain about this guy.

How would it look to you? How would the media react? And would it be a fair hit?

Discuss.

Politely, please.

- jpt

User Comments

Add to the hypothetical that the abortion clinic bombings happened when McCain was 8 years old, which would put them around the time of the American Revolution.

Posted by: seattle mike | October 6, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Jack Tapper is really on overload tonight

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Is this America with a “K” or a C”?
Obama is what he is. He has already chosen who his frinds are.
Can we really trust him?
Vote for an American hero, McCain who was brutally tortured in Hanoi!

Posted by: Hussein | October 6, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Steve Chapman also wrote this…in the Chicago Tribune about John McCain & G. GORDON LIDDY.
What McCain didn’t mention is that he has his own Bill Ayers — in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.
How close are McCain and Liddy? At least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be. In 1998, Liddy’s home was the site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator’s campaigns — including $1,000 this year.
Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as “an old friend,” and McCain sounded like one. “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family,” he gushed. “It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.”

Posted by: David | October 6, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

The “right to life” people would consider him a hero, and the “energized base” would rabidly protect McCain from any criticism.

Posted by: Sara | October 6, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Jake-
You forgot to add the part where the candidate has lied several times about his relationship with the bomber.
When he has said “We were friendly because our kids went to school together”, which was not true.
Or when the candidate said the bomber was ‘just a guy in his neighborhood’ or there was no ‘evidence’ they had a relationship.
And where the records about one of the boards they’d served on were sealed by a supporter the minute a reporter started snooping around.
And that emails went out from the campaign to bombard a radio station with phone calls when reporters discussing the relationship were scheduled to be on.
I think the press would have looked more deeply into the relationship that the candidate was so obviously trying to hide.
If it were McCain, that is.
The reason this is happening now is because no mainstream reporters chose to look into it earlier.

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

“Would you permit an “accused” child molester to babysit your children?”
What is Republican Congressman Mark Foley up to these days?

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Your analogy is a little off. You have to imagine that the former bomber-McCain associate is now the author of 15 books on an important, unrelated subject–maybe health care policy. And you have to add that the former bomber has been given huge grants by major foundations. You also have to add that he’s generally accepted and respected in mainstream circles. You shouldn’t say he’s a professor at a Christian school, but at a large, public university.
In short, if you construct your analogy with more care, the answer is that nobody would attach much importance to the association…. particularly considering that little Johnny was just 8 when the clinic bombings took place.

Posted by: Jean | October 6, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

“McCain who was brutally tortured in Hanoi!”
And yet he changed his mind on torture, siding with the Bush admin instead of following his conscience that torture was abhorrent as he originally did.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Jake – I want to communicate to you my real worry of where this whole election might be heading.
I hope I am just exaggerating but I must say I am beginning to sense some real danger in the McCain camp’s increasingly ferocious attempts to smear Obama. It’s the danger of violence or, more precisely, assassination attempts. I am not sure if the McCain folks realize that racism is still alive and well in this country and it’s extremely dangerous to stir up those sentiments. They will be really sorry if they see blood on their hands.

Posted by: chris | October 6, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

If Ayers is a “terrorist”, why is he teaching at a university in Chicago? Could it be because he isn’t guilty of any crimes other than the ones created by the GOP?

Posted by: JR | October 6, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Most fascinating campaign of my lifetime, a “big issues” campaign, and Tapper wants to play “What If?”
Well, in the terminology of a famous old SNL skit, “what if Spartacus had a Piper Cub?”
This should really be filed under “Department of Really Stupid Hypotheticals That Nobody Cares About.At.All.”

Posted by: JenJen | October 6, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

“If Ayers is a “terrorist”, why is he teaching at a university in Chicago? Could it be because he isn’t guilty of any crimes other than the ones created by the GOP?’
It may be that he got off on a technicality. He still doesn’t regret setting bombs.

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Jake
Of course people would attack McCain for that. People will attack the opposition candidate for anything, even if they have to make it up. The point is, would the voters care any more than they do now?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

The “$200 campaign contribution” is a silly point. Two million people have given Obama up to $200. Are you going to blame Obama for everything those 2 million people have ver done?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Chris – it won’t be anything that hasn’t already been brought up before .. surely don’t need a reporter telling you what you already know to develop an opinion on someone!!

Posted by: Marcus | October 6, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

They still have not tied them all together. I don’t remember where I read this but, I read somewhere that, when Obama was in California he saw an ad for a community organizer in Chciago and called the number. It was William Ayers, who also new Marshall (Obamas grandfathers friend from Hawaii). They knew each other I’ll bet though his mother from the 60’s. That is just my thought. Well anyway.
Obama went to Chicago, and trained people to be active in the community. He trained Acorn volunteers to stand outside banks in chicago and intimate them to lower there standards for mortgage loans. Obama even won a case in court for them. I think it was the only one he tried.
Like good students they pushed people into homes who could not afford them (sub-prime loans) this put Superior Bank into bankruptacy. By that time these bad mortgages were backed by Fannie and Freddie after a bill was signed by Bill Clinton in 1999 for Fannie and freddie to buy more sub-prime loans. These loans were then bundled with other mortgages that were good ones. They sold with AAA ratings to banks and investors all over the world. They are now like a creeping cancer within the financial system around the world.
This melt down started with Obama in Chicago, yet he stands on the stump blaming President Bush and Senator McCain for this fraud against American’s. He has almost bankrupted America even before he got into office, what will he do if he gets into Office with a democratic house and senate.
CHICAGOANS AGAINST OBAMA

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

McCain? Is he still in the race then?
You mean the McCain who one month AFTER the Al Qaeda bombings of American Embassies overseas said:
“Is this guy Laden really the bad guy that’s depicted?”
Nooo… I can’t believe such a total fool is STILL running for President.

Posted by: Heathen | October 6, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Exactly spot on logic Jake…of course most of the posters here fail to acknowledge it.
It is a legitimate issue that Obama hangs around this guy. I used to be a mild lefty and remember how disturbing it was that people on the left would often smirk and support violence against all things American, or say things like, so-and-so was a Black Panther, to positive response. Obama was the same, I am sure…hey Ayers is a well-respected professor thanks to his family connections now! Cool story what with the whole Weather Underground thing.
It is legitimate to complain about this guy, obviously.
What if it was an ex-KKK church bomber? That is so 40 years ago, right?

Posted by: Wade | October 6, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Seven houses!
Eleven cars!
Hundred millions valued family business!
No wonder is time for McCain to turn the page on the economic crisis!
Sleazy McCain you done it again!

Posted by: voting | October 6, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

I LOVE IT!! Keep hittin this fraud .. you waited too long is the problem!! Take the damn gloves off and keep repeating it over and over for another 20 plus days! I sure would ..

Posted by: Marcus | October 6, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Also missing from the analogy- the bomber and the candidate worked together on a board to use educational funds to promote their vision of social justice.
So the abortion clinic bomber and the candidate would have been using educational funds to teach public school children that abortion is wrong. How would the press treat that?

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Obama = Fraud
And Springsteen sucks and has smokers breath!

Posted by: Cindy | October 6, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Jake, I get the feeling that you are fishing for something. What is it? This William Ayers situation has been regurgitated over and over again. It’s a non-news item. Only the Republicans have any interest in keeping this stuff alive. You forget we have been through almost two year primary. I believe it could only affect a small number of people at this point. It’s like trying hold back water from a broken dam. You can only hold it back for so long before the water will come crashing through. Obama will win and he will win in a land slide. This is not an ordinary election. It’s a change election and Obama is a change candidate. People are looking for something different and he is it. So, people could talk about Ayers, Rev. Wright, and other non-issue things if they want but I believe at this late date, the race is over. McCain/Palin ticket will lose in November. I approve this message.

Posted by: LF | October 6, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

“What if McCain had launched his political career in the living room of a former abortion clinic bomber who is now a respected professor at, say, a Christian college”
And therein lies the differnce between liberals and conservatives…..A conservative would never allow a terrorist to teach in ANY christian school.
But nice try Jake!
PUMA!

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | October 6, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Actually, McCain has sat on quite a few boards with despicable people. Do you really want us to go there? We are not responsible for the actions of everyone we have ever sat on a board with.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

The answer to your question is that I don’t think Obama would bring it up, unless of course McCain accused him of having a childhood acquaintance who was Muslim or something equally lame. Oh wait, Obama lived in Indonesia for awhile, so we may hear Sarah Palin raise this as part of her campaign to label Obama as the un-American “other” who isn’t like Joe Six Pack and his hockey mom wife. Then again, do the Obama children play hockey? What does that say about Michelle if they don’t?

Posted by: Jonathan Swift | October 6, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Politely please…come on Jake, that isn’t gonna happen and you know it. LOL I will say it again, if it were just one unfortunate association, I think it would be forgiveable, but where Obama is concerned it isn’t just Ayers. There is a LONG list of questionable associations. It’s just that the msm is choosing not to cover it. A man doesn’t have to be guilty by association, unless you repeatedly make the same associations. As it happens Obama has way to many. As for if it were McCain…PLEASE the media and the dems would be all over it, regardless of what the polls said.

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 6, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

“It may be that he got off on a technicality”
I think the key word there is “may”, but the law says he’s clean and just because “you” and the GOP want to try and use him to smear someone by association that was 8 years old at the time of the “alleged” crime, well, what were you doing when you were 8? Were there crimes being committed by anyone you’ve ever met? Maybe you should be under investigation for un-American activities?

Posted by: JR | October 6, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

As an Obama supporter I don’t think there’s anything wrong with bringing his association to Ayers. But the notion Obama can’t do the same with the Keating Five scandal is laughable.
McCain’s losing ground and it’s predictable he would resort to this form of attacks. The question is… will it work?
Learning from history. It didn’t work for Hillary. Once Obama gains a big shift in the polls it’s unlikely to disappear.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 6, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Keating Five versus Ayers and the home grown bomber who wishes he had set more .. yeh – there is a comparison there! Get real! Obama doesn’t want this talked about .. trust me!

Posted by: Marcus | October 6, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

“And what if Obama started attacking McCain about this guy.
How would it look to you?”
Obama WOULDN’T do that. Period. There’d be no need to, considering the devastating Bush agenda McCain has fot this country, chockful of talking points.

Posted by: mint | October 6, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Ayers wasn’t introducing himself to his neighbors and co-workers as a former domestic terrorist. Give me a break. It had been decades since Ayers wasn’t involved with Weather Underground. How in the world is Obama supposed to vet everyone he ever worked with. This is absurd. Obama works in Washington right now. Is he supposed to quit some committee until he pays to vet everyone on it? Is he supposed to vet everyone who hosts a campaign event for him now? Is Al Gore responsible for working with Clinton while Clinton was getting it on with interns? People who are not in jail for crimes work jobs with people who haven’t committed crimes. They are neighbors. That’s a fact of life. Obama never hired Ayers to
do anything for him. Unlike McCain who is married to Cindy who stole drugs from her charity. Unlike McCain who was friends with Keating who stole tens of thousands of people’s life savings. Give me a break.

Posted by: Anton Bursch | October 6, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Of course it is a valid attack, and the only reasons Obama has been immune to it is:
1) The media is biased toward Obama
2) anyone bringing it up would be accused of racism.
Thank God for McCain and Palin for having the courage to speak the truth, to save America from this Dangerous Obama. Now the media can’t help but bring attention to the truth.
It’s not just the crime, but the cover up…why has Obama lied repeatedly about this relationship?
Obama wants to pick on keating, which is just so STUPID of him, but LOL, go right ahead. McCain was exonerated, and even Bennett, the DEMOCRAT lawyer who worked ono the case, wrote in his book that mcCain should not have been included in the case. Who was deemed guilty? The other 4 DEMOCRATS, one of which is John Glenn, who just introduced Obama to Springsteen!
Obama….liar and hypocrite!
I ask again: how many times in your life have you known a terrorists who was involved in the murder of innocent people? And if you can use sound judgement to avoid such people, would you not expect the same of your President?
How can you possibly support Obama? I just don’t get it. How do you defend yourself for this?

Posted by: liberati | October 6, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

If this were Obama’s only anti-american friend it would be different. He surrounds himself with numerous individuals that hate america and everything we stand for, including Obama, his wife and their hollywood friends who speak so poorly of our country. They hate capitalizm, freedom of speech unless you ascribe to their views. Unfortunitely the democratic party has been taken over by people with ulterior motives. I never thought I would see the day that the Clintons were moderates, but it came about very quickly over the last two years.

Posted by: ubu1991 | October 6, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Well, Jake, how about the media and the Obama campaign ignoring G. Gordon Liddy’s association with McCain and his campaign contributions? He has not been mentioned by the Obama campaign. You see, they had been trying to run on the issues…. They are those things that affect a large number of Americans. If McCain wanted to run on those I wouldn’t have to post the following:
Liddy served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in and the break-in at the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers. Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in “if necessary”; plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a “gangland figure” to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap “leftist guerillas” at the 1972 Republican National Convention — a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain’s campaigns since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008. In addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy’s radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video labeled “John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07″ includes a discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an “old friend.” During the segment, McCain praised Liddy’s “adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great,” said he was “proud” of Liddy, and said that “it’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program.”

Posted by: Southern IL | October 6, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

DNC Party Crasher: “I don’t remember where I read this but, I read somewhere that.”
LOL. And I read “somewhere” that Alvis was abducted by aliens. So it MUST be true.
Obama was in New York when he heard about the Chicago job, which had absolutely nothing to do with Ayers.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Obama should have stepped up to the plate when he was 8 years old and put a stop to Bill Ayers anti Vietnam protests!

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 6, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

The oh so sorry and repentant guy you describe, ( Mr Ayers), is not so repentant. See the pic from 2001 of him standing on a US flag. …..aaaand, if it isn’t so important why the Shakespearian backlash from the Obama camp?…..Anddddd
Why did Mr O deny any knowledge of the guy in the first place, ( our kids go to the same schools? He lives in my neighborhood?)…….aaannnndddd…. isn’t this the tip of the iceberg with Mr O? I.E. He knew nothing about Rev Wright, nothing about Tony Rezko, and he has denounced and demeaned anyone that he knew growing up , ( previous to 2007), including his mother and grandmother? AAANNNNNDDDDDD…. he continually lies while receiving carte blanche to be worshiped by a marginalized, in the tank, sloppy, journalistically underachieving , fawning media just when they are needed the most to exposed this charlatan, ( not Charlemagne mind you). This is a age of nothing, ( those that believe in nothing will fall for anything), construction with absolutely no foundation. So there!
PS Clear the fog out of your minds long enough to try to remember anyone that has gotten less glove on him than “O” He makes Hilary Clinton look like an experienced , centrist statesman.

Posted by: L Elion | October 6, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

“Ayers wasn’t introducing himself to his neighbors and co-workers as a former domestic terrorist. Give me a break. It had been decades since Ayers wasn’t involved with Weather Underground.”
The brilliant Obama with his radical far-left roots, had no idea who Ayers was and what he did? You’d better believe he knew who he was and he still sought out his guidance to launch his political career.

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

liberati
Obama does not know any “terrorists who was involved in the murder of innocent people.”

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Obama HAS already talked abour knowing Ayers, hasn’t he?
Obama has gone at great lengths discussing Wright and his church, hasn’t he?
What more could one expect? And that’s recycling the attacks won’t work for McCain.
Obama is TOUGH AND SINCERE, as Bill O’Reilly put it. McCain has of no chance of winning a fight against a man like Obama, for McCain is an opportunist gambler who cannot be trusted.

Posted by: Kathy | October 6, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

And then let’s add in the Kremlin connections:
Pfotenhauer’s invocation of abortion clinic bombers in defense of McCain is ironic given that McCain has repeatedly voted against protecting Americans from domestic terrorists in the anti-choice movement. On multiple occasions throughout his career, McCain sought to limit the government’s ability to punish violent anti-choice fanatics by:
– Voting against making anti-choice violence a federal crime. As the Jed Report notes, McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.
– Opposing Colorado’s “Bubble Law.” McCain said he opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics [Denver Post, 2/27/00]. The law was later upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
– Voting to allow those fined for violence at clinics to avoid penalties by declaring bankruptcy. NARAL Pro-Chioce America notes that McCain “voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.”

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

In fact, John McCain has a history of supporting terrorism: the Contras. They were a terrorist group who attacked and murdered civilians in Nicaragua in the 1980s. McCain (like a lot of Republicans) supported them. But McCain went a bit further than most – he made donations to them. That’s right, John McCain personally contributed to terrorists who bombed and attacked civilian men, women and children.
Yet no one talks about it or questions him about it. Seems much worse, funding terror, than simply knowing or working with a guy a guy who decades earlier had done something despicable.

Posted by: bdbd | October 6, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

“Obama should have stepped up to the plate when he was 8 years old and put a stop to Bill Ayers anti Vietnam protests!’
How old was he when he sat in Ayers’ living room seeking out Ayers’ guidance to help launch his political career?

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Whoops…
wrong stuff on the Kremlin connections..
Yet despite McCain’s tough talk, behind the scenes his top advisers have cultivated deep ties with Russia’s oligarchy–indeed, they have promoted the Kremlin’s geopolitical and economic interests, as well as some of its most unsavory business figures, through greedy cynicism and geopolitical stupor. The most notable example is the tale of how McCain and his campaign manager, Rick Davis, advanced what became a key victory for the Kremlin: gaining control over the small but strategically important country of Montenegro.
According to two former senior US diplomats who served in the Balkans, Davis and his lobbying firm, Davis Manafort, received several million dollars to help run Montenegro’s independence referendum campaign of 2006. The terms of the agreement were never disclosed to the public, but top Montenegrin officials told the US diplomats that Davis’s work was underwritten by powerful Russian business interests connected to the Kremlin and operating in Montenegro. Neither Davis nor the McCain campaign responded to repeated requests for comment. (Davis’s extensive lobbying work, especially on behalf of collapsed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has already attracted critical media scrutiny.)

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

All those are so… “concerned”… about McCain’s strategy of going after O’s judgement through associations, are pulling our legs! HA! Ooooohh, This will hurt him… oooh this will cost him the election. NOT! This is the best thing to happen to this campaign. The O supporters know this. I love the fact that the truth is finally coming out.

Posted by: Katy | October 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

The “what ifs” would not fit because with Obama there is so many other things that make one question his history….his association with his pastor, Rezko, being born to a father who was muslim etc etc. These things add weight to the history of this canddidate so if Mac had an association like the one jake described it would not hold the same weight unless the other variables were included…so this is not hitting the mark.
Obama is going to go through the ReubliAmerica sees what is behind these attacks and we don’t end op with another 4 years of idiocracy….not that Mac Cain is anothr Bush becuase he is not…but Gov Pallin is a big fish from a small pond and she will not make it in the big pond…and never, ever as a POTUS

Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | October 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I agree with Maybee, Jake, you forgot one VERY significant detial to your little reverse analogy above….Obama LIED, repeatedly, about this relationship. Obama supporters say, well, gee, he can’t be responsible for every relationship, there is nothing wrong with it….blah, blah, blah….well, if so, then why has he LIED about it?
what does he have to hide? LIke the other things he refuses to release: his senate records, his medical records, his list of legal clients, his associations with REzko, his list of small donors from overseas….
Why did Axelrod say, just today, that Obama did not even know about Ayers? ARe you kidding me? Are you saying that either Obama is that clueless, or is blatantly lying?
you are running out of stable ground to stand on, Obama supporters. What say you?

Posted by: liberati | October 6, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“Obama HAS already talked abour knowing Ayers, hasn’t he?’
He orginally said that he “was some guy from the neighborhood”. Why did he feel the need to lie about his relationship with Ayers?

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Ayers hosted an event for Obama in his living room.
Obama: I am not friends with Ayers.
Liar LiarLiarLiarLiar

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

They should stick to the t
high gas prices and how
solving that would solve e
everything else.
It is the economy but
all its woes can be
solved by attaining
energy independence and
reform. Those who can
deliver these must be
judged not by their
promises but by their
track record. McCain
and Palin undertook
reform and Palin
negotiated a 40 billion
pipeline. Vote for them.

Posted by: Virgil | October 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Katy,
you really think the hate mongering and inciting to violence at the Mccain rallies are the best thing to happen to the campaign for McCain?
It’s shameful, irresponsible and reckless just like McCain.

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I don’t like this sentence:
“What if McCain had launched his political career in the living room of a former abortion clinic bomber.”
That Obama “launched his political career” in Ayers’ house is a distortion of facts to make the story fit the Republican narrative.
It was Obama’s predecessor in the Illinois State Senate who knew Ayers and invited Obama over to his house to introduce him to the Hyde Park circle. To say that Obama launched his political carreer in that room is dishonest.
The Ayers story as told by the Republicans is full of these small exagerations. Without them, there is no story.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 6, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

If this narative was tagged to McCain, he would be CRUCIFIED by the press.

Posted by: Katy | October 6, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Jake, how about covering the Berg trial? The attorney for Obama is filing a petition to suspend discovery pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss. Gee, I wonder what Obama could be hiding? Could it be that doesn’t have a legitimate birth certificate?

Posted by: Your Conscience | October 6, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

In your scenario, the media would be going nuts. Frankly, I think the abortion issue is why the media have been so hard on Gov. Palin.
Jake, here’s a question for you. A lot of conservatives think the press has been very easy on Sen. Obama. I have called it journalistic malpractice and many on the right think the lack of scrutiny and the level of pro-Obama coverage are unprecedented. It might surprise you to hear a conservative say this, but I actually think having a skeptical, adversarial press is very good thing for this country. Given the almost complete and total in the tank coverage of Sen. Obama, is it possible that his administration will be covered with the kind of rigor that our democracy needs or will it be akin to the coverage of the politburo?

Posted by: Stevereno | October 6, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“Sen. Obama has accused me of opposing regulation to avert this crisis. I guess he believes if a lie is big enough and repeated often enough it will be believed.”
So what is the “attack hag” doing then?

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

jock — you are SOOOO out of touch.
Ayers is an admitted, unrepentant terrorist, who’s work with the Weather undergroudn was responsible for the deaths of several law enforcement. He was caught before he was going to set a bomb off at Fort Dix, had he not, many more would have died.
Your denial is both laughable, as well as disturbing, that you are doing whatever you can to protect Obama, including ignoring clear facts.
Read the truth: Obama has had YEARS of relationship with Ayers, there is absolutely no doubt.

Posted by: liberati | October 6, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

“”And, according to the New York Times, he was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that, quote, ‘launched a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and our U.S. Capitol,’” she continued.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

It would depend entirely on the nature of the current association. What board? What does it do? What do you mean by “friendly”?
To use reality as an example, it would be absurd to say that Obama, by sitting on a board addressing educational issues with Ayers (now an expert in educational issues), therefore shares Ayers beliefs that planting bombs in opposition to the Vietnam war was a good thing. There’s no link there.
Similarly, if this hypothetical person was now an expert in educational issues and McCain sat on a board with them related to educational issues, it would be absurd to say that McCain therefore supports bombing clinics. Depending on the exact nature of the board, it might reinforce questions about McCain’s position on abortion of course.
That also highlights a flaw in the analogy – planting bombs in opposition to the Vietnam war is rather different to planting bombs in opposition to abortion. For one thing, the Vietnam war ended.

Posted by: Aengil | October 6, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

At war the first casualty is the truth. At this electoral race the truth has been killed by McCain/Palin and the Republicans

Posted by: republicans nomore | October 6, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Dear “Hussein”.
yeah,,,mcCain what a hero…cracked after a couple of days in Hanoi…repeatedly gave up information for cigarettes and coffee.
Before that…watched on closed circuit tv from the officer’s breakroom while his fellow shipmates tried to save lives due to the firestorm HIS plane started on the ship. Over 100 died while he watched all comfy cozy like. THEN, when they were in the cleanup and burial phase…he flew to Hanoi with a reporter for some “R&R”.
MY HERO!

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

As other posters said, Obama did not “launch” his campaign at Ayer’s house.
The event was for Alice Palmer’s announcement that she would run for Congress. Obama was invited there by Palmer. He was going to be Palmer’s endorsed successor for her Senate seat. He didn’t choose to have the event at Ayer’s house.

Posted by: Marcos | October 6, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Ayers hosted an event for Alice Palmer in his living room.
Alice Palmer invited Obama.
Liar LiarLiarLiarLiar!!

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

I think the real issue is that if McCain wants to be forgiven for his mistakes during the Keating 5 scandal and claim that he learned from them and became a reformer then he needs to allow for the same of Ayers. In the 1960′s William Ayers did something that were quite simply wrong, but since then he has become a leader for education reform in Chicago and a respected professor.
McCain can’t ask to be treated one way, and not expect the same treatment for someone else. People do learn and grow from their mistakes, but it is how you lead the rest of your life that is important.

Posted by: blogger | October 6, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Pollster:
McCain: 163
Obama: 296
Toss up: 79
Ouch.

Posted by: johnTX | October 6, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

If McCain was supported by a guy who bombed abortion clinics the far right would be CERTAIN to vote McCain.

Posted by: Gus | October 6, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Obama/Ayers
The Weathermen always gave warnings before the bombings, so that innocent people would not be killed. No, that doesn’t excuse their actions. Obama has condemned their actions and so do I.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Karen,
Did I refer to dopes at rallies making death threats???? Take a breath and read my post again. The truth about O and Ayres is relevant and it’s great to finally be coming out so people can make an informed decision. End of subject.

Posted by: Katy | October 6, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Obama/Ayers
Why are you claiming these falsehoods about Obama?

Posted by: The Unshrub | October 6, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

“If McCain was supported by a guy who bombed abortion clinics the far right would be CERTAIN to vote McCain.”
As the far-left are supporting Obama, and applaud Ayers as a true American hero. Warped.

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

KEATING 5-That Killed our economy in the 80′s

Posted by: CLARICE HARRIS | October 6, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Ayres in an NY Times article on September 11, 2001 said he had no regrets about the bombings.
Obama still continued his relationship with Ayres.
Obama still continued to e-mail him for years until the presidential campaign.
Obama went to a party with his wife for Ayres.
His relationship was bad enough with ayres but when Ayres said he didn’t regret the bombings at all and for Obama to still keep up the relationship with him is beyond beleif.
But Obama is teflon and the media comes to his defense and treats him with kid gloves.
Obama the most media protected candidate ever.

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Oh, so many McCain freaks and so little time to respond…………………

Posted by: The Unshrub | October 6, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Obama/Ayers
Why do you dislike Hawaiians? That is unamerican.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Let’s play the association game!
McCain – Gordon Liddy
He’s a Terrorist
Palin – Husband Todd Palin
He’s a former member of the Anti-USA Alaskan Independence Party
McCain – Charles Keating
Former crooked banker that McCain associated with
Palin – Pentecostal Witch hunter Muthee, Anti-Semite, speaks-in-tongues all while Sarah sat and listened and had a laying of the hands from him
McCain – Adulterer
Cheated on 1st wife with Cindy and is suspected of cheating on Cindy with Vicki Iseman.
Palin – Troopergate
First she’ll cooperate & then she won’t…Flip Flopper!
McCain – U.S. Council for World Freedom
John sat on the board of this ultra conservative, right-wing group run by
John Singlaub, who wound up involved in the Iran contra scandal.
Palin – Ted Stevens
Republican Senator under indictment
McCain – Rick Davis
John’s lobbyist campaign manager guilty of receiving payments from Fannie & Freddie as recently as May, 2008.
Palin – Adulterer
According to the National Enquirer…I know it’s the Enquirer but everyone listened to them when it was about John Edwards!
McCain – Phil Gramm
Helped engineer the deregulation that has helped steer our economy into a ditch.
Palin & McCain – LIARS
John claimed he’s about change and sticking to the high road…he lied.
I can keep going but this is a small sample of their greatest hits

Posted by: Patrick in IL | October 6, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

El_Pajaro : It was Obama’s predecessor in the Illinois State Senate who knew Ayers and invited Obama over to his house to introduce him to the Hyde Park circle. To say that Obama launched his political carreer in that room is dishonest.

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

John McCain Profile:
John McCain hobby? Political stunts!
John McCain dream? Be the president no matter what!
John McCain political ideology? Opportunist!
John McCain cheerleader? Sarah Palin.!
John McCain favorite place? Florida, many elderly residents and you can manipulate the voting results!
John McCain favorite Cable news? FOX spin masters!
John McCain favorite movie? Pinocchio!
John McCain favorite song? Bomb.Bomb..Bomb Iran!
John McCain favorite word.? President Reagan ,my friends!.
John McCain friends? Wealthy people like him.!
John McCain ability ?Regular flip flop.!
John McCain number of houses? Seven!
John McCain Number of cars?Eleven!
John McCain definition of middle class?Under five million dollars assets!
John McCain family business value? Over hundred millions!

Posted by: dontspin | October 6, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

the problem is that the abortion bomber is not hypothetical. McCain voted down legislation thjat specifically addressed those that bomb abortion clincs assault docotors and patients at said clincs and those that sought to avoid responsibility for thier illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy instead of paying fines. McCain is an unrepentant supporter of domestic terrorism as long as it supports his position.

Posted by: Danny | October 6, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

McCain’s political career was launched by two convicted felons: Charles Keating and Jim Hensley. While not directly involved in killing anyone, Hensleys alcohol sales most likely contributed to the deaths of thousands of people in Arizona. Professor Ayers hasn’t killed anyone. Hensley, additionally, was connected directly to organized crime figures.

Posted by: Flash Override | October 6, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Hey Jake!
Rev. Wright is a radical liberal anti American.
William Ayers is a radical liberal anti American.
Father Flager is a radical liberal anti American.
Rashid Khalidi is a radical liberal anti American.
Khalid al-Mansour is a radical liberal anti American.
Birds of a feather, flock together! or is that chickens coming home to roost?
It’s no wonder obama and his wife don’t think that there is anything wrong with these characters, they are just like them.
Jake, the media never fully vetted all of these radical liberal anti American connections because they are cowards. You don’t have a shred of objectivity if you don’t investigate this now. The media sent hundreds of people to Alaska but not one to Chicago.
Jake your credibility and fairness is on life support.

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

And so at the Palin rally they yell “Kill Him” and at the McCain rally they yell terrorist.
What does it matter what I think? The what ifs are meaningless what counts is what is.
The economy is tanking and McCain and Palin are running a dishonorable and incite-full campaign.

Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Obama said that subprime loans were a good thing.
Obama worked for ACORN to pressure banks to give bad loans to minority homeowners.
Obama defended fannie mae’s harold raines.
In 2004 all the dems defended fannie mae at a hearing because of harold raines.
Obama also defended jim johnson who took a 25 million dollar golden parachute.
Jim Johnson is still on the Obama campaign giving breifings.
Jim Johnson used abuses practices at countrywide and Obama still keeps him on his campaign.
Hillary should be the nominee but she was cheated by the media and the left wing superdelegates.

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

further John McCain’s racial bigotry is also well documented, he was adamantly against the MLK holiday as well as very pro-flying the confederate flag over governemnt buildings. he onley reversed himself on these positions once they became political liabilities.

Posted by: Danny | October 6, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I think its funny that this is a non-issue for so many Obama supporters. Obama had to get involved with Rezko and Ayers and Wright if he were ever going to get the support to run for office in Chicago. I grew up in Chicago and know how the city works…it is a joke. I can’t believe that posters here would think that there is no connection between Obama and Ayers. Are newspaper articles from 11 years ago made up by the GOP? How deep does this conspiracy go? Obama himself argued with Hillary when she brought up ayers saying didn’t your husband pardon Ayers friends.
If i were entering politics i would think that i would want to stay away from someone who had an admitted hand in bombing the capital whether it was last year or 50 years ago. I guess thats why i could never run for office.
Obama sat back and watched his fellow democrats block bills to be brought up for oversight on Fannie/Freddie. Then hires Jim Johnson a former CEO of Fannie Mae who made millions to help him find a good running mate. But you Obama supporters have no problem with that. Am i making this up or spinning it? No. Look up Jim Johnson on whatever site you want the answer is always the same. Look up his connection with Obama and you will see he stopped working on the campaign because of his scandal with Countrywide. Is this another GOP conspiracy. No, its another Obama fact that sets a tone for what Barry stands for.

Posted by: mike | October 6, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Jake,
McCain is friends with Gordon Liddy who went to jail for illegal activities and who wanted to murder people.
Gordon Liddy donated $5000 to the McCain campaign.
Jake, I really think this talk is getting dangerous. Today an audience member at McCain’s rally called yelled out “TERRORIST” in reference to Obama. At a Palin rally today one audience member yelled out “KILL HIM” in reference to Obama when she started talking about Obama and Ayers. We have the first African-American man vying to be the president of the U.S. He is at HIGH RISK for assassination. I think you need to tamp this stuff down.

Posted by: Chrissy | October 6, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Jock666,
“Ayers hosted an event for Alice Palmer in his living room.
Alice Palmer invited Obama.”
THE TRUTH:
In the mid-1990s, Ayers and Dohrn hosted a meet-and-greet at their house to introduce Obama to their neighbors during his first run for the Illinois Senate.
Obama stabbed Alice Palmer in the back and took her senate seat because Ayers told him too. Now he is friends with Ayers
“Today, Ayers and his wife — fellow former Weather Underground fugitive Bernardine Dohrn — live in Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago” (A BLOCK AWAY FROM BARACK OBAMA. YES THE HOUSE THAT OBAMA BOUGHT FROM REZKO IS A BLOCK AWAY FROM AYERS)
I’ve worked to put myself through college. Did volunteer work and everything else to bolster my resume to get into grad school but have gotten turned down by many of my first choices. And here we have Ayres and Dohrn with their resume getting Ph.Ds and Law Degrees and getting hired as Professors.
Crazy me, I thought helping the disadvantage over bombing police stations would be viewed favorably to the admissions committees.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Obama is the same guy who voted to keep a felony for a homeowner hale demar because he used a handgun protecting his family and home against a robber.
Just think about this Obama voted to give a homeowner a felony for protecting his family with a handgun against a robber.
Obama believes you shouldn’t be able to have a handgun in your home to defend your family.

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

McCain likes to talk about the house he didn’t own … the Hanoi Hilton.
Hmmm. Visitors were Communists sympathizers whose intent was taking down America.
So now what? McCain’s a Communist?

Posted by: newz4i | October 6, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Jake,
Stop with the Ayers crap. Today audience members in McCain’s and Palin’s rallies yelled out “terrorist” and “kill him” in reference to Obama after they went on the attack.
This kind of stuff my lead to Obama’s assasination which would be the worst thing that could happen right now.

Posted by: David | October 6, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

John McCain and Sarah Palin want to be elected like Republicans but they are trying to avoid discussing issues critical for the American families. And portraying themselves like reformers because they are embarrassed of the last 8 years of the Republicans –Bush Administration Americans want answers to they problems they want better healthcare they want better pay they don’t want just change because that sounds good on election time, they want change from the Bush policies.
The financial institutions are bankrupt. The dollar super weak
The military are stressed out dangerously. Factories and jobs move overseas.
Home owners become homeless. And John McCain worry about the judgment of OBAMA?
McCain is desperate to be a President! He doesn’t see the disaster of Iraq coming when he vote in favor of War .He support deregulations and then argue about the circus of Wall Street .A person who talk against the Government but he favors the government interference .What you can say about his judgment? Now we know that not only Obama can lead, but also he had a plan for the future of this great country!
Now McCain can snooze tight. Obama can answer the 03.00 am call any time!
Rebublicants can spin like wash machine all day long! The truth is
Senator McCain past actually impairs him from to be flexible and confront the future with open mind. The last days of the campaign confirmed that McCain -Plain are the most inadequate people to run this country!
The same people who gave George Bush a second term should feel responsible for the mess that is occurring today. They are the same ones who today have doubts about the ability of Obama to be a good choice for President. At war the first casualty is the truth. At this electoral race the truth has been killed by McCain and the Rebublicants .

Posted by: dontspin | October 6, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Speaking of bombing abortion clinics:
Jed Report notes, McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.

Posted by: Thinking | October 6, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

It was not subprime loans that caused the current crises, it was wreckless lending and then the bundling and selling of mortgages as commodities that caused the crisis. Not all subprime loans failed, not even a majority. It wasn’t until the mortgage industry wanted to gut the market that they started what could only charitibly called sub-subprime loans. all but ignoring credit scores and ability to repay. then selling those loans off before the ink was dry.

Posted by: Danny | October 6, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Wrong – Palmer gave the race to Obama. Obama took up the offer and decided to run. When Palmer loss she reverse course. Obama had already made promises to run and ran against her. He effectively got her off the ballot by challenging her signatures. Only person backstabbing was Palmer.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Obama – A Cult of Personality
A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader (Obama) uses mass media to create a heroic public image through unquestioning flattery and praise. Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships but can be found in some democracies.
A cult of personality is similar to general hero worship except that it is created specifically for political leaders (Obama).
Generally, personality cults are most common in regimes that seek to radically alter or transform society according to revolutionary new ideas.
Often, a single leader becomes associated with this revolutionary transformation, and comes to be treated as a benevolent “guide” for the nation, without whom the transformation to a better future cannot occur.
“Comrades, the cult of the individual acquired such monstrous size chiefly because Obama himself, using all conceivable methods, supported the glorification of his own person. . . . One of the most characteristic examples of Obama’s self-glorification and of his lack of even elementary modesty is the edition of his book The Audacity of Hope, which was published in 2006.
This book is an expression of the most dissolute flattery, an example of making a man into a godhead, of transforming him into an infallible sage, “the greatest leader,” “sublime strategist of all times and nations.” Finally no other words could be found with which to lift Obama up to the heavens.
We need not give here examples of the loathsome adulation filling this book. All we need to add is that they all were approved and edited by Obama personally and some of them were added in his own handwriting to the draft text of the book.”

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Obama said our troops were air raiding villages and killing civilians in afghanistan.
Obama said this in summer of 2007 when he was courting the far left.
It is the taliban who go into villages and kill civilians. It is the taliban who go into villages and hide and fire rockets at our troops. It is the taliban who use civilians as sheilds while firing at our troops.
For Obama to blame our soldiers in afghanistan when they are in an impossible situation shows how unqualified he is for CIC.
Seems the only americans who are for McCain are the soldiers. Military poll had soldiers supporting McCain 68-23. No wonder why dems have always tried their hardest to keep them from voting.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

“Pollster:
McCain: 163
Obama: 296
Toss up: 79
Ouch.’
Just makes us want to work harder. Some Americans aren’t afraid to work hard to accomplish their goals, unlike some that expect the world to be given to them with little or no effort on their part.

Posted by: Mack | October 6, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

The headlines would be 6 inches tall across the page – McCain tied to Abortion Clininc Bomber!!!!!
NYT, WaPo, Politico, networks, the rest.

Posted by: JG | October 6, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Charles Keating was sentenced to prison and required to pay more than $1 billion in civil penalties after being convicted on fraud, racketeering and conspiracy charges centered around his running of Lincoln Savings and Loan, which he bought in 1984. On April 14, 1989, Lincoln was seized by the government at an eventual taxpayer cost of $3.4 billion, then the most expensive thrift bailout in history. Lincoln and Keating became national symbols of the savings-and-loans collapse of the ’80s — much as lending firms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have symbolized the current financial meltdown.
McCain had been friends with Keating since the early ’80s — their families vacationed together several times, according to previous CNN reporting. Keating was an early financial supporter of McCain’s political career and donated to his campaigns repeatedly over the years. Keating’s first company, American Continental, was headquartered in Arizona, the state McCain represents. McCain became one of the so-called “Keating Five” — five U.S. senators investigated over accusations they tried to interfere in a federal investigation of Keating’s role in the savings-and-loan’s collapse.
In January 1985, while in the U.S. House, McCain co-sponsored a resolution that would have delayed the effective date of proposed government limits “on direct investment in real estate, service corporations, and equity securities by federally insured savings and loan associations.” He was one of the early sponsors, although a majority of Congress eventually signed on to sponsor it. The legislation would have impacted Keating’s business, but would have regulated the entire industry, not specifically Lincoln Savings and Loan.
McCain also wrote several letters to government regulators and other officials regarding the issue. One, dated Jan. 30, 1985, to White House chief of staff James Baker, called the proposed regulations “unwise,” saying the effort “flys (sic) in the face of our recent efforts to remove the hand of government from the affairs of private enterprise.”
On April 9, 1987, McCain and the other senators attended a meeting with federal regulators investigating Keating. McCain has since said he regrets doing so. “He asked me to help him,” he said during an October 2002 interview with Chicago’s WGN-AM radio station. “I said I wouldn’t do certain things. He called me a wimp. I threw him out of my office, but I still went to a meeting with four other senators with a group of regulators.”

Posted by: whoa | October 6, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

and what if berg vs obama a judge in penn has ruled that obama produce his birth certificate. and what if obama asked for a 3 day extension? and what if the judge allowed it?

Posted by: venus | October 6, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

The Obama Youth Junior Fraternity Regiment.
kids dressed in paramilitary uniforms ritualistically shouting out their praise for Obama. Yes, according to the chants, these kids are supposedly inspired to enter various professions all thanks to a certain Chicago Machine politician. This is reminiscent of North Korean kids chanting out their praises for the “Dear Leader.”
How about exploiting those little kids to “Sing for Change” video.
Brainwashing the youth to sing or recite the political slogans of their “Dear Leader”.
Kim Jong-Il must be jealous. Anybody remember any other paramilitary youth organizations formed to support a political party movement?
Echoes of 1939.
They definitely are using a tried and proven playbook. Tell a big lie enough times and it becomes the truth.

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

All those are so… “concerned”… about McCain’s strategy of going after O’s judgement through associations, are pulling our legs! HA! Ooooohh, This will hurt him… oooh this will cost him the election. NOT! This is the best thing to happen to this campaign.
———————–
Well, sorry nothing else has happened with McCain’s campaign that you can tout as “good”.
However, the only ones who find these smear tactics appealing are Republicans. Hate to tell you, Republicans are already voting for McCain.
Independents and newly registered voters are more concerned about what McCain has already done to screw this nation, and what can’t and won’t do for the nation in the future.
Being from what McCain’s brother just called “communist country” yesterday, I’m glad the state of Virgina will in turn, show him what we think of “maverick’s” last gasp effort to get anyone to pay attention to him.
I pass the Pentagon and Arlington National Cemetary every single day. But we’re “communists” just because we know that Republicans have been a disater for this country.
I find it telling that those of us who work and live right in the heart of our nation’s capital, over whelmingly support Obama!

Posted by: Virginian's for Obama! | October 6, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

it is so sad to see john mccain who seems an honorable man, sink this low.
it some would listen closely, they would hear, mccain and co. saying:
we cannot win this election on the up and up. It seems mccain has lost faith in his own ability, or he is just seeing the writing on the wall.
to have someone in your campaign say,
we need to turn the page, because if the conversation stays about the economy, we lose.
I think they believe and already know they have lost. that is why, they have pulled out the dirty trick book.
sarah palin-who in her only real shot to tell us something about herself,when asked at the debate, are there any promises you have made-you would change given this economy? the only answer palin had was “I have only been at this five week, i have made no promises” well she should have know john mccain platform well enough to be able to give an intelligent answer. she did not.
i would not be suprised if we don’t end up with a hot mike moment for sarah palin, looking out at those adoring,”Please help us close our eyes and ears to the real problems, and tell us smooth things” crowds, and hear her say “wow, these people really do look as dumb as they must be.
because I and everybody else knows,
I don’t know Jack- and for that matter she does not know John “coconut” mccain
with her “there you go joe, looking back again statement”
I, and all of you know why mccain and co. don’t want us looking back, because with this horrible economy, they are afraid you will look back and see just how close john mccain is connected to george bush.
why isn’t john mccain and co. out there every chance they get and blasting george bush, and all of the problems with this economy?
because-he know just how closely tied he is to bush and this economy,-mccain has nothing, he told us he didn’t know much about the economy, that is why he agreed with everything bush and co. with the economy, and see where it has got all of us.
why isn’t mccain talking about the economy? because georg bush and co. have already said it for him.

Posted by: omg | October 6, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

SALES TAX IN CHICAGO 10.25%
THE HIGHEST IN THE NATION
MARCH 2008
Early Saturday, Cook County Board President Todd Stroger (OBAMA’S CRONIE CHICAGO PAL) struck a deal with board members, who approved a 1 percent increase in the sales tax – driving Chicago’s overall sales tax to double digits at 10.25 percent, easily among the highest of any big city.
And it will be enacted just in time for the Christmas shopping season.
“We got where we needed to be, and that’s a great victory for the five and a half million people who live and work in Cook County,” Stroger stated in a release early Saturday. “By working together, my administration and the board of commissioners have achieved a common goal today – to ensure that the millions of County residents who rely on us for vital services can continue to count on us to meet those critical needs.”
Keep Reading
– OR –
Read about how the Cook County Board is considering hiking up the parking tax as well.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

“Just makes us want to work harder. Some Americans aren’t afraid to work hard to accomplish their goals, unlike some that expect the world to be given to them with little or no effort on their part.”
Technically Mack, posting right wing talking points on news blogs isn’t working for your candidate.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

The only thing that changed since last week is that Obama pulled ahead and the majority of the swing states. McCain choice is politically motivated and character assinations. There should be a law against smearing covered under defamation of character.
By the way I love how McCain followers are trying to paint community organizers has communist. I guest the Peace Core and Catholics are all communist under McCain’s America. – The Return of McCarthyism.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Obama did a land deal with rezko while he was under federal investigation for influence peddling by patrick fitzgerland.
Obama had rezko build a fence and a sweetheart deal for part of his lot.
Obama then said no one could have had any inkling rezko was in trouble.
Obama lied to the washington post and GMA before the south carolina primary.
It turns out Obama did know rezko was under federal investigation for influence peddling when he did the land deal.

Posted by: Sam | October 6, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Jake, how about covering the Berg trial? The attorney for Obama is filing a petition to suspend discovery pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss. Gee, I wonder what Obama could be hiding? Could it be that doesn’t have a legitimate birth certificate? How about you actually investigate and report – you can always find another job where you don’t have to constantly compromise your journalistic integrity.

Posted by: Your Conscience | October 6, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

joey,
Obama didn’t start that Crap you’re talking about…some nutjob teacher did.
let’s talk about the real associations. We know about Ayers. We know Obama had a working relationship with him on the Annenberg project….All of the records have been pored over in detail…and guess what…no smoking gun.

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

People on these boards are full of politics.
Bottom line, our economy is in crisis. Another 500,000 jobs will be lost before the next president is in office.
I have lost 30% of my retirement savings this year.
Anyone who changes the subject doesn’t care about the country.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Dan, I hate to tell ya, we have been killing more civilians than insurgents in Afghanistan. This is fact, as reported by the DOD. Iraq has been a trillion dollar boondoggle that has done nothing but increase recruitment for terorist cells and weakened us in the region.

Posted by: Danny | October 6, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Yup and proud of it. Cook County is the most tax county because we make money. We pay are state taxes through a sell taxes which mean the more you spend the more you pay taxes. Also we have high property values in Chicago which is the third largest economy in the country. Taxes in context….

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Jack,
This is dangerous stuff, questioning a Presidential candidate’s patriotism,likening him to a terrorist. As others have pointed out, both sides can play this game, but does it do any of us any good to sow distrust and suspicion about the character of the best candidate either party has to offer? McCain and Paliun better get back to programmatic, not personal attacks. To continue as they are incites anger and even hatred. It could incite someone to an assassination attempt. Why not? If Obama is disloyal, if he is a terrorist, if he disrepects our troops, why wouln’t someone take a shot? McCain is breaking the basic pact of political process in a democracy: we won’t incite or resort to violence.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Here’s an original question: How can Palin attack Senator Obama when HER husband, yes Palin’s husband, belonged (belongs?)to an extremist group that wants Alaska to succeed from the Union?

Posted by: Okay Bob | October 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Flash Override said: McCain’s political career was launched by two convicted felons: Charles Keating and Jim Hensley. While not directly involved in killing anyone, Hensleys alcohol sales most likely contributed to the deaths of thousands of people in Arizona. Professor Ayers hasn’t killed anyone. Hensley, additionally, was connected directly to organized crime figures.
Oh but he did. A police officer. So when we say…get over it. I defy anyone to go to this mans widow, and say that. Also, two members of the weather underground were killed while trying to transport, or detonate a bomb, that was intended for a military dance in New Jersey on a base there.
Unrepentant, and never served time for these crimes.
Up until the 60′s, what you accuse the Republicans of, is what the Democrats were…and still are. Thru their social programs, they’ve managed to keep millions in poverty, and dependent on the welfare system. The new slavery.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

As the far-left are supporting Obama, and applaud Ayers as a true American hero. Warped.
====
the left isn’t saying Ayers is a hero.
Palin is the one saying Ayers and Obama pal around. Well they don’t.
McCain is desperate now.. he’ll say anything.

Posted by: Gus | October 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

We would be about where we are.
Neither side cares about the truth, both sides are slinging mud, and our 401ks are melting like cotton candy on the sidewalk at the local carnival.
Barack cheats to win and McCain’s campaign is gasping for breath.
Hillary Clinton is relaxing and watching the melee. Sarah Palin is learning the trade craft faster than any new national figure in recent history.
In four years, only the last two will matter.

Posted by: len | October 6, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

but guess what…the tactic is working for McCain to the extent we are all talking about smear tactic bs instead of how to fix the country…
enough.
Let’s not incite racism and hatred.
Please people develop a sense of responsibility instead of this crappy warfare while the country goes down in flames…
Question…how many of you supporting McCain voted for W?

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

A preview of the impact of the Obama economic plan and his vote in favor of the bailout.
——————-
Yet another misguided and easily manipulated lemming attacking without substance.
You DO McCain voted FOR the bail out right? You know, he did the “I suspend my campaign” political stunt? I suppose you missed that part?
You DO know the bail out was presented by a REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT right?

Posted by: Uh, Great Logic... Really | October 6, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

John McCain sat on the board of a very right-wing organization, it was the U.S. Council for World Freedom, it was chaired by a guy named John Singlaub, who wound up involved in the Iran contra scandal. It was an ultra conservative, right-wing group. The Anti-Defamation League, in 1981 when McCain was on the board, said this about this organization. It was affiliated with the World Anti-Communist League – the parent organization – which ADL said “has increasingly become a gathering place, a forum, a point of contact for extremists, racists and anti-Semites.”

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Compare “Obama’s Terrorist Connections: William Ayers” with The speeches Ayers and Dohrn gave at the November 2007 Students for a Democratic Society reunion.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 6, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I would wonder about the timing. If Obama thought it was that important to McCain’s character, why would he wait so late in the race to bring it up?
If I truly have an issue with someone’s character, I address that before anything else.
So, my gut feeling here is that McCain himself doesn’t honestly believe what he is dishing out about Obama, it’s just another calculated political move to sway voters.

Posted by: Andre | October 6, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Hmmmm … McCain friends with a terrorist …. Does George W Bush count?

Posted by: Jack | October 6, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Let’s say that Obama’s daughter were pregnant and not married. Imagine the righteous indignation of the right wing wackos. Ohh the horror of it!
And they aren’t even married!!

Posted by: Gus | October 6, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Jake how about this ….
This from ThinkProgress…. obviously they know how to research:
McCain Voted To Protect Domestic Terrorists Who Carry Out Violence At Abortion Clinics»
This morning on CBS’s Early Show, McCain-Palin campaign spokesperson Nancy Pfotenhauer attempted to defend Gov. Sarah Palin’s (R-AK) debunked claims that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) has been “palling around” with former radical William Ayers. Referencing a recent New York Times article, Pfotenhauer claimed that if McCain “hung out with somebody who had bombed abortion clinics” it would be a legitimate topic of discussion.

Posted by: l | October 6, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

.. Does George W Bush count?
===
considering W is the biggest terrorist in the world.. YES!

Posted by: Gus | October 6, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Republicans = Double Standard
I am officially convince McCain would know honor if it hit him in the face.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

My God… Obama was even questioned about Ayers in the ABC Clinton-Obama debate!
Did ANY reporter or ANY debate moderator asked McCain what he has learned from the Keating Five scandal? Or ask any questions about his “old friend” Gordon Liddy, a domestic terrorist and political criminal? Or discuss his support to the muslim terrorists of the Albanian KLA? etc etc.
Obama has been grilled in public about Jeremiah Wright.
So what is the issue?
Well, the issue is that the MSM is not all in the tank for Obama, but constantly questioning him instead, while they naively accept McCain’s own assurance that ‘Americans know me well’.
Well, if Americans read the Rolling Stone’s brilliant 10-page portrait of this “make believe maverick”, then yes they would know something about McCain.

Posted by: kurt | October 6, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

and further more,
palin accuses biden of looking back
she is trying to get us to look back and dream up and imagine things that could have, may have, may not have, happened with obama and ayers.
mccain and palin want us to look into that make belive horizion.
and look over the picture right in front of us.
mccain and bush hugging, mccain saying i don’t know much about the econony, mccain, saying bushes economic plan is a good one.
if i were mccain and palin i would be desperate for people to look over the immediately in front of us, or at best directly in behind us, to
palin and mccain-”people don’t look at the connection between bush and mccain-that is history.
look,way way back and try to see what i am telling you about obama. I know you have heard all of this before, but i need you to think about this again, forget that economy stuff for right now.
let me tell you a story, about a big, bad, scary man, named obama.

Posted by: omg | October 6, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Yeah how is Obama’s policies working in Chicago?
Death, drugs, unemployment, taxes, etc etc.
Thanks Barry!

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Oh but he did. A police officer.
————————
Really? You’re saying Ayres killed a police officer and yet was never convicted of anything?
Sure. That happened.
I bet your good at seven moves to Kevin Bacon aren’t you?

Posted by: Republicans are desperate | October 6, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

If the guy had bombed an abortion clinic almost 40 years ago, when McCain was 8 years-old, then no, it wouldn’t be a fair hit.
Especially with the economic crisis we’re in. Why can’t McCain tell us how he will turn the economy around? Does he have a plan? Tax cuts for the wealthy? We’ve already tried that. It’s not working.

Posted by: cincyr | October 6, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

KEEP UP THE NONSENSE, MCCAIN CAMPAIGN. HERE’S THE LATEST FROM REAL CLEAR POLITICS:
Colorado 48.0 44.0 Obama +4.0
Ohio 48.7 45.2 Obama +3.5
Florida 49.3 45.3 Obama +4.0
Nevada 49.3 47.5 Obama +1.8
Missouri 47.8 47.5 Obama +0.3
Virginia 49.9 45.1 Obama +4.8

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | October 6, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Obama been vetted for nearly 2 years. Palin 5 weeks and we have found out that she has just as much baggage as Obama. I think Palin is a little bit more dangerous then Obama ever could be.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Sarah Palin is mrried to a radical who advocated Alaska succeding from the country and McCain wanted to protect individuals who bombed Planned Parenthood offices. WHen AYers was a terrorist, Obama was eight years old. Sounds like McCain and Palin are closer to terrorists than Obama.

Posted by: alwriter | October 6, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

The difference is Obama doesn’t have a long association with Ayers….

Posted by: Chad | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Hey Jake!
Rev. Wright is a radical liberal anti American.
William Ayers is a radical liberal anti American.
Father Flager is a radical liberal anti American.
Rashid Khalidi is a radical liberal anti American.
Khalid al-Mansour is a radical liberal anti American.
Birds of a feather, flock together! or is that chickens coming home to roost?
It’s no wonder obama and his wife don’t think that there is anything wrong with these characters, they are just like them.
Jake, the media never fully vetted all of these radical liberal anti American connections because they are cowards. You don’t have a shred of objectivity if you don’t investigate this now. The media sent hundreds of people to Alaska but not one to Chicago.
Jake your credibility and fairness is on life support.

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

He had no inkling about rezko when rezko was under federal investigation for influence peddling by patrick fitizgerald’s office.
Obama the next month did a land deal for a part of rezko’s lot and had him build a fence.
Obama no idea about ayres but continued to e-mail him after he said he no regrets to the ny times about the bombings.
This is a pattern.
He had no idea about Wright. But Obama still praised Wright after Wright said our chickens came home to roost on 9/11.
A list of who Obama had no idea about: Wright, Ayres, Rezko, Pfleger,

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

To those using the Keating 5. McCain was exonerated. End of story. When Keating came to him, McCain threw him out of his office, and it didn’t take 20 years to do so.
Now, I wonder how you use this, when Obama has Glenn, exonerated in the Keating 5, and 2 that were convicted, are all working for Obama now. So does that make Obama even worse in his judgements? That he allows 2 of the 3 found guilty in the Keating 5 to work on his campaign?
McCain acknowledges he used bad judgement, and has apologized over, and over. Has Obama? Is he man enough to do that?
I would like to add something else. Liz Trotta today, was doing an interview, and referred to Trig Palin, the son of Sarah Palin as “It”. This is the party of tolerance? This is the party of unity? She denegrated this innocent life, to being a freak show, at a carnival, and dismissed this leaving, breathing, beautiful baby, as an “it”.
Sad days ahead I fear.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

MM,
WE LOVE YOUR REVISIONIST HISTORY OF THE ALICE PALMER / OBAMA SITUATION:
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
Alice Palmer campaigned for Hillary Clinton in Indiana.Palmer is the former state senator. In the ’90′s, she selected Obama to be her successor. But when she tried to reclaim her spot, B.O. got her kicked off the ballot.
The fact is the Hyde Parkers whom Obama was courting at the time would’ve remained loyal to Palmer and many told him as much at the home of Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers in late November of 1995.
Obama knows his way around a ballot not like the somewhat sanitized version of the DNC nominee. Showing his bare knuckles in first campaign, Obama revealed hard-edged, uncompromising side in eliminating his female party rival and his former mentor. When asked whether the district’s primary voters were well-served by having only one candidate, Obama smiled and said “I think they ended up with a very good state senator.”
Many Chicagoan’s felt it was very nasty, dismissive thing to say, as they already HAD a very good state senator, Alice Palmer.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

RealClearPolitics is the best becuase it records trends not just polls and the trends are pointing towards Obama. Even when McCain was up Obama only loss by a couple electoral votes. This means Obama is going to win, by how much is up to the American people.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

“The fundamentals of the economy are strong.”
(If you own 7 houses and 13 cars and just gave yourself a nice tax break, sure, I guess they are)

Posted by: McCain is Out of Touch | October 6, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

if mccain continues to drop in the polls,
don’t be suprised people to finally hear palin, mccain and co.
ask this question:
“You do know obama is black? don’t you?

Posted by: omg | October 6, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

No amount of cane riding (or should I say cain riding) wizardry of lies, half-truths and demagoguery by the witch of wasilla high is going to change the fact that she is married to a cecessionist and a terrorist; As for McSame McCain.. it is about time the media started looking into his ties with – family or otherwise – with organized crime wallstreet and on mainstreet.

Posted by: Jane Sixpack | October 6, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

SArah Palin talked about Obama Rev WHite, but neglected to mention her preacher who declared a woman as witch who was causing a rash of auto accidents, then he ran her out of town. Methinks Palin is living in a glass hockey house.

Posted by: alwriter | October 6, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Okay…
so everyone on here seems to be getting a least a working acquaintance with the associates of these two men. It appears neither is a choir boy…
Now can we talk about issues and plans?
Hint…I’d like to see some from Mccain…

Posted by: karen | October 6, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

KEEP UP THE NONSENSE, MCCAIN CAMPAIGN. HERE’S THE LATEST FROM REAL CLEAR POLITICS:
Colorado 48.0 44.0 Obama +4.0
Ohio 48.7 45.2 Obama +3.5
Florida 49.3 45.3 Obama +4.0
Nevada 49.3 47.5 Obama +1.8
Missouri 47.8 47.5 Obama +0.3
Virginia 49.9 45.1 Obama +4.8

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | October 6, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Voting against making anti-choice violence a federal crime.

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

About the villages: It is a basic fact of warfare that you win on the ground, not from the air. Whether it was Dresden,Tokyo,London,or Baghdad,the majority of casualties in warfare are ciovilians, especially air warfare. You can destroy a city or village from the air going after combatants, but you can’t kill them selectively, nor can yo control the society and territory without foot soldiers and lots of them. When Obama made the comment that is now being criticized he was arguing for more ground troops to avoid the situation where we were just bombiong from the air, destroying villages and killing civilians because of lack of troops on the scene. Listen to the whole speech, you can’t put any meaning on a ohrase without knowing what comes before and after. Palin and Mccain are acting like demagogues, willing to say anything to win.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

what if McCain used the abortion clinic bombers home to start the campaign?
we’d fire him.
fire obama

Posted by: trettione | October 6, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

DNC Party Crasher
So are you conceding that Obama is tough politically and has the possibility to get things done while in office. Palmer gave up her seat and Obama didn’t want to give it back. I like this example if someone gave you a promotion and then decided to take it back because there other job fail through would you willing give back the promotion.
You just ran in circles.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Obama rises as the markets drop, you mean.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Can’t win on domestic policy
Can’t win on international policy
Can’t win on health care
Can’t win on taxes
Can’t win on financial policy
Can’t win on judgement
Can’t win on “experience” (thanks Palin!)
Can’t win with old war stories
Can’t win with a winking pageant princess
Can’t even win gettin’ mavericky
Uh, let’s try smear tactics and name calling…yah, that’ll work

Posted by: The Republican Strategy | October 6, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

It’s good that this is what everyone is talking about from my point of view.
Why doesn’t the MSM demand BHO’s medical records,names of his campaign contributers, and his missing Illinois senate records?
What’s he hiding? Who is the real Barack Obama?

Posted by: Jan | October 6, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

let’s see , we all know McCains’s Gpa, his college activities, his course work..
what we know about Obama’s college… nada,
did he get into columbia or havard on affirmative action?
did he get in trouble?
was he frat boy?
etc.
Obama is not vetted

Posted by: trettione | October 6, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

trettione
I got my first job working for a reformed convict.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

oh, and we have the obama media fans going…
YAWN,, we don’t want to report or dig on that news… it’s racist to question obama

Posted by: trettione | October 6, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Or what about McCain friend/supporter G Gordan Libby?

Posted by: tr | October 6, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

McCain campaign – The New UnApology: Keating Five investigation was ‘a political smear job’ on John McCain
Holy crap.
I’m listening to the McCain campaign conference call about John McCain’s involvement in the Keating Five scandal. McCain’s lawyer, John Dowd (see directly right) just said that the Keating Five investigation was “political” as it concerned John McCain. He shouldn’t even have been admonished by the Senate, his lawyer says.
Then McCain’s lawyer dropped the real bomb.
The Keating Five Investigation was “a political smear job on John [McCain].” WTH? He called Howell Heflin, who led the hearings, a “stooge” of the Democratic machine out to get poor, innocent John McCain.
This opens up the entire question of McCain’s supposed contrition. If McCain thinks he did nothing wrong, and that it was wrong for the Senate to scold him for his actions during the Keating Five Scandal, then he isn’t contrite at all, he isn’t sorry at all. He’s learned nothing. You can’t turn a new leaf when you don’t think you did anything wrong. This is one hell of an admission.
That’s not what McCain said in his book, Worth Fighting For:
I made the worst mistake of my life by attending two meetings, the first with the chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, the government agency charged with regulating the practices of the nation’s savings and loans, and a week later with four bank examiners based in San Francisco who were at that time investigating the investment and lending practices of Lincoln Savings and Loan of Irvine, California, owned by my good friend and generous supporter Charles Keating.
And it’s not what he was saying last year:
I was judged eventually, after three years, of using, quote, poor judgment, and I agree with that assessment.
Ben Smith appreciates this striking shift.
I’d always thought McCain’s great strength in defending the Keating affair was that he’d acknowledged making a huge mistake, and spent his career repenting by recasting himself as a reformer.
So when his campaign puts his lawyer on the line with reporters to contest the details of a congressional inquiry that, largely, let McCain off the hook, doesn’t that cloud the sin-confession-atonement dynamic a bit?
Steve Benen adds:
It does, indeed. When McCain conceded wrongdoing, he used it as a platform to begin supporting campaign-finance reform. It made him a “reformer.” But now, the new argument is that McCain was the victim here, and his years of contrition were a sham. This argument, in effect, turns nearly two decades of McCain arguments completely on their head.
It’s hard to believe, but the McCain campaign has deliberately made this a new story all over again, just when the Obama campaign wants it to be.

Posted by: sp | October 6, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

trettione
Obama’s College
President of Harvard Law Review (Most Prestiguous Student Honor)
graduated Magna Cum Laude
Taught has a senior lecturer of Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Jake asked for respect on this thread, and I for one will oblige that request, because I was raised with some manners, and decorum.
I get angry like everyone else, but I try very hard to base any arguments I have with the facts, and try to back those facts up.
Calling Mrs. Palin a witch, or calling any of the candidates names, is silly, childish, and trite, and weakens any argument, or comment one might have.
So I ask nicely, to please stop the name callings. State your arguement, or comment, back it up with facts if you can, and leave it at that. :)

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

The fact that Obama was 8 years old is a bit of a red herring. Ayres was a fugitive that remained on the run through the early 1980′s. Parts of the Weather Underground were active through that time. That’s approximately 14 years before he and Obama admit to meeting, and into Obama’s adulthood.
For perspective, McVeigh bombed OKC 16 years ago. It seems like yesterday, doesn’t it?

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

ObamaWillLose
Obama will win. This is a grammatically correct sentence in the future tense.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Monday Oct 6 Update
Berg vs Obama
TWO FILINGS: Berg Files Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint, Obama and DNC File Motion to Delay Discovery Until Judge Decides on Prior Motion to Dismiss
It was a busy day in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania today. First, attorney Philip Berg files a motion asking the court to permit him to file an amended complaint with several additions, and then next, attorneys for Barack Obama and the DNC file a motion asking the court for a protective order, essentially asking that the judge rule on their motion to dismiss for lack of standing before ruling on Berg’s motion for expedited discovery.
Philip Berg “He’s asking to delay discovery and I’m obviously going to oppose it. This isn’t right. This just isn’t right. By tomorrow, we’ll have a response and put out a press release. The American people should hear about this and, if they do, they should go nuts. It’s time to put up or shut up.”
If Obama has a valid birth certificate as he says then what’s the problem?
—————————————
If the judge rules that Obama has to produce the birth certificate Obama could be in trouble. I don’t understand why he just doesn’t produce it and end the matter, unless he’s hiding something.

Posted by: Gargoyle | October 6, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

So Ayres was convicted of bombing? no?
So he was convicted of terrorism? no?
So he was convicted of hurting someone? no?
What exactly was he convicted of again?

Posted by: And he did what? | October 6, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I used to admire John McCain when he was first in politics,and I really was surprised when GWB beat him in 2000 with that phony “black love child” rumor. I never understood how so many voters could go for a phony mail-it-in playboy like Bush over a real honest-to-god soldier and POW. Nuts!
But now, sorry. McCain has lost my respect and admiration with his stunts and erratic behavior throughthe last several months. Maybe he feels cheated bu 2000, maybe he really can’t stand Obama, for whatever reason, but he’s looking more pathetic and incompetent by the day.

Posted by: Dan | October 6, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

John McCain’s preoccupation with William Ayers is further evidence he never fully made it back from Vietnam. It’s very sad. The whole far right can never seem to let go of the 1960′s. For the rest of us, it’s ancient history and holds little relevance for our politics today. What we are seeing from the McCain/Palin campaign are its death throes. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Posted by: PolarBear08 | October 6, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Mr.Tapper, what happened to you ? Your blog is a waste. You should maybe switch to FOX News ! They make up stuff in the face of the worst financial crisis this country has seen in a while.
Do you understand what is at stake here ? China is waiting to take over ! Start learning Chinese, people of America !

Posted by: yardgirl | October 6, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

LET’S DISCUSS G GORDON LIDDY:
As Media Matters for America has noted, Liddy served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in and the break-in at the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers. Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in “if necessary”; plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a “gangland figure” to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap “leftist guerillas” at the 1972 Republican National Convention — a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain’s campaigns since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008. In addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy’s radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video labeled “John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07″ includes a discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an “old friend.” During the segment, McCain praised Liddy’s “adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great,” said he was “proud” of Liddy, and said that “it’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program.”

Posted by: flop sweat express | October 6, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

So Ayres was convicted of bombing? no?
So he was convicted of terrorism? no?
So he was convicted of hurting someone? no?
What exactly was he convicted of again?
————————————-
He and his wife were indicted for setting off bombs but only she was convicted.

Posted by: Avalon | October 6, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Does anyone care that the DOW dropped below 10,000 today???!!! This is exactly why the chasm between the rich and the poor is widening. What does it say about us when the world’s economy is in the toilet, and the only thing people here want to discuss is a lie that the McCain campaign continues to repeat. (Remember that it doesn’t matter how often Palin repeats the lie, it still won’t make it true.) Stay focused people, and vote! Let the small minds harp on this insignificant mess, but prove yourself more sophisticated: Do your own research, and, for goodness sake, VOTE! It’s your/our future at stake here.

Posted by: Deja Vu No More | October 6, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Who a president chooses to associate with is precisely the issue—especially if the president is as inexperienced as Barack Obama.
Presidents need to assemble a trusted inner circle to advise them on policy and governing. George Bush, another inexperienced candidate, put together a kitchen cabinet of policymakers who were very far to the right of what the American public elected. So we should be especially concerned with Obama’s choices. Therefore his relationships with Ayers, Rezco and the Reverend Wright should absolutely come under the microscope—as well as Obama’s relationships with the former CEO of Fannie Mae, as well as one of its top execs, who now help lead his campaign. These men and their value systems would influence a president. We should learn from Bush’ relationship with Cheney and vet the candidate’s friends and advisors, as well as the candidate.
Knowledge is never negative.

Posted by: Jane Becker | October 6, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Gee, desperate Republicans using smear tactics to try get someone to pay attention to their weak candidates
Yah, that’s a “change” isn’t it?
Same OLD party, same OLD tactics, same OLD candidate – nothing “maverick” about McCain at all.

Posted by: Same Old Party | October 6, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Correction Backstabbing implies that Obama had trick someone, which he did not. Palmer wanted her seat back so she wanted to take it back from Barack (sounds like backstabbing to me). Obama said he would run, started running, promised running, and decided to fulfill his promise. I guess you are a bad judge of character. But you do realize you are defending the true friend of Ayers, Palmer, who invited Obama to the event. Circular Talk Express.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Hey, Jake, did anybody ever answer your question?
I’d give it a shot but see, I’m still not clear of the details of the relationship between Obama and Ayers. The MSM doesn’t seem to have done much digging and all that darn paperwork is missing.
As for McCain and the abortion clinic bomber scenario. If it was truly as passing connection that could be proven then I would tend to ignore it and I would think Obama shouldn’t be attacking him for it. But if the connection looked suspicious or if the words of McCain didn’t match his behavior at the time, then I would say, yes, Obama has a right to bring it up and ask for an explanation. (And also wonder aloud why the MSM isn’t doing its job.)

Posted by: mary | October 6, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Just my thoughts on the matter:
since McCain’s campaign has started on Obama’s associations this week
Let me give you 3 names to remember:
Charlie Black,whose lobbying firm represented human rights abusers in the Philippines and Nigeria…AND MCCAIN CHIEF ADVISOR?
Rick Davis a Republican strategist, and co-owners of Davis Manafort Inc., a public relations firm that worked for a Ukrainian political party backed by Russian leader Vladimir Putin..and involved with Freddie Mac, also associated with Oleg Deripaska an organized crime figure who has been denied entry in the US
who is also tied to……
Paul Manafort whose lobby group has taken in millions of dollars in hefty fees from the torturers, human rights abusers, and tyrants they called clients in Nigeria, Kenya, the Philippines.
and let’s throw Ted Stevens and John Abramoff in for good measure since they had associations with Palin
again..it shows that McCain has poor judgement in picking his associations…especially if he insists on keeping them around.
BTW
Didn’t McCain ealier this year shy away from attacking Obama and Wright?
Does anyone remember the North Crarolina Repus that McCain had them remove an ad smearing Obama and Wright saying: “I’m making it very clear, as I have a couple of times in the past, that there’s no place for that kind of campaigning, and the American people don’t want it.”
I guess he has changed his mind and made a place at the table…I wonder if he will say anything to Sarah since she is now bringing it back up.
Not that she wants anyone investigating Rev Kroon who says that God will punish those “slip slidin’ Americans….”

Posted by: Aitch Cee | October 6, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

McCain has far worse associations, as anyone who’s read the current article in Rolling Stone will know. And frankly, with the economy in this shape, I care more bout them than some fictional abortion clinic bomber, because they indicate his ties to lobbyists, his taking bribes and involvement in the Keating Five S&L scandal. The fictional abortion clinic guy would not be important to me. Neither is Ayers.

Posted by: mags | October 6, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

“The fact that Obama was 8 years old is a bit of a red herring. Ayres was a fugitive that remained on the run through the early 1980′s”
Countering very slight exaggeratation with greater exaggeration is not the way to go. It’s true that Ayers participated in the bombing of the Pentagon in 1972 when Obama would have been 10. I don’t, however, think the difference between him being 8 years old and 10 years old is significant.
As for what you said though, the charges were dropped against Ayers around 1976 (when Obama would have been 14), and Ayers turned himself in in 1980. He was not on the run through the early 1980s.

Posted by: Aengil | October 6, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Who a president chooses to associate with is precisely the issue
=======================
Ok Jane
So I assume you have a problem with a 58 year old man taking money from and aiding a convicted felon I suppose? (aka John McCain)You would think a man of 58 would know right from wrong.
Or how about a candidate who picked a running mate who is CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION for abuse of executive power? Seems that is VERY relevant to a potential national leader isn’t it?
Or are you just a hypocrite like the rest of the them.

Posted by: Don't say it if you don't mean it | October 6, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Do you know that banks may cease to lend money? What will that mean for you? Do you know that each month this country is bleeding thousands of jobs? Does it matter that you may be next? When you envision the future, what do you see? Have we become so weak that we would dare support a hate/fear mongerer? The correct answers are yes, unsure, yes, hope and no.
Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: Enough | October 6, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

How about looking into McCain’s friendship with G. Gordon Liddy?
Since Ayers, and Wright are so interesting to you… lets look at the other side and be fair.. huh?
Also what about Todd Palin and his membership with AIP? and Sarah Palin’s video to the AIP welcoming everyone to the the convention?
Just because the pitbull whined about the MSM doesn’t mean you have to be afraid of her…
Do your job

Posted by: l | October 6, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Sick of GOP
Thanks for the link.
Very interesting article!

Posted by: Cover of the Rolling Stone | October 6, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

mccain, is not worried about the dow droping,
mccain,bush, palin, and cheney will be just fine in this economy, thank you very much.
that is why mccain can afford to try and change the subject.
you and your economy don’t matter eonugh for him to talk about,
mccain’ bottom line is just fine.
anyway, why wouldn’t you expect someone who said they don’t know much about the economy, to change the subject.
of course mccain does not want to talk about it.
and what mccain has to say, is
any questions on the economy i refer you to the statements i made with our great president bush,
the economy is sound, and doing just fine.

Posted by: omg | October 6, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Thank you to the person who mentioned G. Gordon Liddy. I’ve been wondering why no one is mentioning him. I believe he told the Branch Davidians to shoot the federal ATF agents in the head because the agents were wearing flak jackets! And this is a man McCain counts as a friend? He hasn’t even bothered censuring Liddy. Why is no one talking about this? This association between the two of them is still going on.

Posted by: pagetraveler2244 | October 6, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

G Gordon Liddy, the convicted burglar and Nixon era plotter of assassination and kidnapping is a great friend of McCain’s.
Figures. Crooks hang together.

Posted by: bubba | October 6, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

sp, I could use the same arguments you would use to defend Obama.
McCain was exonerated, and twisting things won’t change that. He acknowledged he used bad judgement, and even the prosecutor said he never should have been brought up on charges. So he apologized for using bad judgement, but other than that…what you posted is just spinning the facts to suit your argument.
Obama is now being investigated on his associations. Some could be national security issues, when they are sending money to known terrorist organizations, and have illconcieved, and dangerous ideas for Israel…and staunch ally of the U.S.
This doesn’t mean Obama is guilty, but it does mean he has had contact with all in the past, and who knows how many currently. That’s why the investigation. IF it were McCain right now, I would demand no less. I’d rather find out now, than when it’s to late.
There was a story I read somewhere today, where some prominent Israeli’s are angry with Obama, for misleading them, and editing their interviews, to make it look like they were supporting Obama, when indeed, they said it would be inappropriate, and unethical for them to involve themselves in U.S. politics. That speaks volumes. In one’s interview, they said nice things about both Obama, and McCain, yet the McCain parts were left out.
Unethical. Investigate now…because once he’s president, Israel could be no more….and that would make us complicit in their demise.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I am going to enjoy watching McShame and thr Pig in Lipstick go down in flames!

Posted by: jim | October 6, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

John McCain just never did get it. He’s not going to be the President and I’ve lost all respect for him because of his dim-witted campaign mud slinging. He should go back to Arizona and bury himself in the sand with his druggy wife. Palin needs to go back to her igloo and count her moose hides.

Posted by: Carol of Missouri | October 6, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Ayers turned himself in in 1980. He was not on the run through the early 1980s.
—-
Fair enough, he turned himself in in 1980, after knowing the charges against him had been dropped. Other members of his group were convicted in 1981.
So he stopped being a fugitive only 15 years before we know he first started working with Obama. Obama was not 8 years old when the story of the Weatherman had played out.

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Do not allow the paid McCain bloggers to get you off message. Don’t drink their kool-ade, it will only make you sick. Ignore their posts and continue to speak life.

Posted by: Whatever | October 6, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Seems to me that none of the hypocrites screaming about the incidental relationship between Obama and Ayers want to address the ongoing and current relationship between McCain and Libby. Read the two paragraphs below and tell us all why it doesn’t matter to you “Country First” folks:
As Media Matters for America has noted, Liddy served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in and the break-in at the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers. Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in “if necessary”; plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a “gangland figure” to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap “leftist guerillas” at the 1972 Republican National Convention — a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain’s campaigns since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008. In addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy’s radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video labeled “John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07″ includes a discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an “old friend.” During the segment, McCain praised Liddy’s “adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great,” said he was “proud” of Liddy, and said that “it’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program.”

Posted by: wakeup | October 6, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Do you know that in every appalling there is a palin?

Posted by: Just So | October 6, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Jake,
The answer to your question is:
G. Gordon Liddy
G. Gordon Liddy
G. Gordon Liddy
G. Gordon Liddy
G. Gordon Liddy
G. Gordon Liddy
Is he a terrorist? You-bet-ya! Does he pal around with John McCain. Right again!
Working at Richard Nixon’s Committee to Re-elect the President, Liddy concocted several plots, including:
- firebombing the Brookings Institution in Washington,
- kidnapping anti-war protest organizers and transporting them to Mexico during the Republican National Convention,
- the break-in at Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s office.
- the break in of the Watergate hotel

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 6, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Since Ayers, and Wright are so interesting to you… lets look at the other side and be fair.. huh?
———————
Face it. Pubs don’t want to know about their own candidates. The truth is too damaging to their fragile image of McCain and Palin.
The only association that has any bearing right is McCain and George Bush.
The rest is a bunch of contrived non-sense.McCain and Palin have equally, if not more so, as shady a history as Obama and Biden.
Palin is obstructing an investigation, ignoring subpoenas, and has used her political office to settle personal vendettas.
McCain was directly involved in the Savings and Loan scandals. He took money and aided a convicted felon.
These are not “guilt by association” issues. They are guilt by the candidate themselves.
But a Republican will rationalize why they don’t really matter as a character issues. Republicans are masters at rationalizing. They have to be since their party caused every mess our country is in right now.

Posted by: Give up on that one | October 6, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Sorry…I wrote it wrong. Correction:
Did you know that in every appalling word there is a Palin?
LOL

Posted by: Just So | October 6, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Republicans wouldn’t be as classless as to put someone like that on the ticket. But Dems like corrupt people. It makes them feel good – like one of their kind.

Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | October 6, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I believe that each of us has worked with, gone to college with, grown up with, or are related to people that are the opposite of what we value or what our principles are. I often learn what NOT to do by knowing and talking to people who are unlike me. I value myself and strive to encourage others of what I’ve learned by being a witness to those that I disagree with. I don’t care if McCain went to the home of an anti-abortionist and neither do I care about William Ayers. If the critera to be President is defined by only speaking or associating with people who represent your values, no one is qualified. If my child ever wanted to run for the office of President, he or she could never write about it, must interview and research every person they associate with, and most disturbing can never learn from others who are different. I’ve yet to see a substantive accusation of character from either party and these attacks are just farder for their perspective bases. Where is the decency in our politics and when is enough enough?

Posted by: Shannon | October 6, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

ROLLING STONE!
GONNA GIT MY PICTURE ON THE COVER
GONNA SEND FIVE COPIES TO MY MOTHER,
i LOVE ROLLING STONE!

Posted by: omg | October 6, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

tapper, you can’t compare the two… abortion clinic bombings are recent history and mccain is 72 years old… you would have to go back 66 years to see what injustice people were rebelling against back THEN to make this a logical anaology… stop trying to stir up the dirt and try to do some reporting on ISSUES (like the economy, global warming, health care, foreign policy) instead of this crap… obama is going to cream mccain because americans are informing themselves and actually care about the issues

Posted by: earthisnotflat | October 6, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Republicans wouldn’t be as classless as to put someone like that on the ticket. But Dems like corrupt people. It makes them feel good – like one of their kind.
Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | Oct 6, 2008 8:50:07 PM
================================
Explain the relationship between McCain & G Gordon Liddy

Posted by: uranidiot | October 6, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

BlameAmericaLast
Your name speaks ignorance of America’s past policies. We put dictatorships in half the countries we are fighting against right now.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

“And what if Obama started attacking McCain about this guy.”
The thing is this: I think the Obama campaign would have been smart enough NOT to do this. This guilt by association strategy (or is this a tactic? Clearly I am unqualified to be POTUS), for someone with his own skeletons in the closet (not to mention the Palins’ skeletons – for all of this babbling about the media’s supposed lack of interest in ACORN, I think the media has demonstrated the same “lack of interest” in Todd Palin’s membership in the Alaskan Independence Party). As evidence, look at the way they ran the primary. Clinton sold herself as already vetted and tested – an open book, just like John McCain is doing right now – yet I think there were plenty of opportunities for the Obama camp to dredge up the past and blow her away with a rehash of all of the Clintons’ greatest foible hits. Instead, they chose to run on the issues…and the math.
One thing, though that the Obama campaign learned with the primaries is that although they can avoid negative character attacks on offense, they can’t afford NOT to mount a defense if the same attacks are thrown. This is why this new McCain strategy is so stupid = a guy with an S&L scandal can nary afford to paint Obama into the corner on a guilt by ass’n strategy, especially with such a weak running mate as Palin. McCain’s campaign just can’t make up now for not bringing their A game at the outset.

Posted by: beelzebubbles | October 6, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Do you know that in every appalling there is a palin?
——————-
That’s funny!
Careful though, someone might get mavericky on you.
What’s the difference between a pitbull and Palin?
The pitbull has been vet-ed.

Posted by: Comedy Central | October 6, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Dow Jones fell 800 points today. What is McCain’s response on the matter.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Dow Jones fell 800 points today. What is Obama’s solution?

Posted by: geevill | October 6, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Now let me see if I have this right. In a time of brutal national economic crisis longitudinally caused by rich powerful confidence men, one rich United States Senator who was born into a powerful family is accusing a middle class United States Senator who was born into a single-parent headed family of guilt by association regarding a wannabe domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers, with whom the available evidence shows the middle class Senator clearly had at best a tenuous association many years after Bill Ayers’ alleged terrorist thoughts.
Meanwhile, the middle class Senator is asserting that years back, the rich United States Senator from the powerful family did exactly what existing evidence proves the rich Senator actually did, protect a felonious confidence man Charles Keating from prosecution, a man who was admittedly the rich powerful Senator’s good friend, whose actions in the 1980s clearly mirror, if not catalyze, the very bad acts by new confidence men that caused our current brutal national economic crisis. And now we Americans are supposed to employ the above facts to decide which Senator’s accusations or assertions are more believable.
Hmm, even discounting the abuse of truth and the political process that appears to have gone on up to this point more on one side of this political competition than the other, there is no question which of these Senators a reasonable person would likely believe. But then, large numbers of us Americans are assumed by some politicians to be pretty weak in the reasoning arena, susceptible to a good political trick, whether that trick is based on pandering or pimping. But then everyone knows the old saying; “when you assume, you make an ass of you and me.” Not this time Senator.

Posted by: DMD | October 6, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Thanks for pointing out how slim the rant about Ayers is – it’s pathetic.
McCain’s hypothetical abortion bombing acquaintance would have to be ?? almost 90 years old? and have committed the crimes in his twenties.
I’ll just go with McCain’s questionable acquaintances when he was an adult, like Keating, like his stripper girl friends….

Posted by: McGreen | October 6, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Ayers wasn’t introducing himself to his neighbors and co-workers as a former domestic terrorist. Give me a break. It had been decades since Ayers wasn’t involved with Weather Underground.”
It’s been almost 40 years since Charlie Manson and his followers committed heinous murders as well. Doesn’t make it any less true that it happened.
The difference…Mansons been in prison for 40 years for his crimes. Ayres? 0, and still wishes he’d done more!

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Now these people are mentors. LMAO!!! I know my next door neighbor, he must be my mentor. Hey I bought a house from that guy, he is my mentor. I go to church every Sunday , the reverend must be my mentor. I’ve been a mentor to college students and it is much more involved then that. At least I know what network you listen too. Still…
Dow Jones fell 800 points today. What is McCain’s response on the matter?

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I wonder if McCain and Palin know that a 90 year old American woman shot herself because she could not afford her mortgage and was afraid she would lose her house. I wonder if they care…

Posted by: Addie | October 6, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

geevill
Stimulate the middle class by creating jobs. Middle class spending will re-energize the economy. That is how we got out of the great depression. Put people to work. Specifics are on his website.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

McCain is pro domestic terrorism. as long as it is directed at abortion clinics and head start preschools.

Posted by: Louis | October 6, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

As long as the media continues to have a hard on for Obama nothing will change!
WAKE UP AMERICA!

Posted by: IndieVisible | October 6, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

He did. Ever hear of the US Council on World Freedom? John-boy was on the board. They made their mark as a part of the Iran/Contra Affair. How many people were killed by Contras? How illegal was the transfer of money? Did Ayers kills anyone? McCain has blood on his hands. He should shut the hell up.

Posted by: mudge007 | October 6, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Were this the first time it had come up, the Ayers link would fair game and the media would have an obligation to follow through on its veracity and relevance. However, Ayers because has already been discussed at least a couple of times this election cycle, whether during the primaries or by McCain (after he had won the nomination but before Obama had done so), the importance of Ayers is lessened. My point is simply that the Ayers bit is a retread. Given the current economic situation, Ayers is a sideshow, and it should be covered as such.

Posted by: Chris | October 6, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

By the McCain definition of mentor, Charles Keating, G Gordon Liddy and his Captors in Vietnam all count as McCain Mentors.

Posted by: Danny | October 6, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

He did. Ever hear of the US Council on World Freedom? John-boy was on the board. They made their mark as a part of the Iran/Contra Affair. How many people were killed by Contras? How illegal was the transfer of money? Did Ayers kills anyone? McCain has blood on his hands. He should shut the hell up.

Posted by: mudge007 | October 6, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

TJ, THE CLINTONITE
Where have you been the past 2 years? Someone can’t be unknown for two years. the only candidate that is unknown is Palin.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

using the McCain campaign definition of what constitutes a mentor, Keating Liddy and his playmates in the VC all qualify.

Posted by: Louis | October 6, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

TJ, THE CLINTONITE
Palin was already being investigated when she was tapped has VP. All it takes nowadays is to be devoid of facts to be a Republican

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

IF JOHN MCCAIN WAS IN ANY WAY ASSOCIATED WITH AYERS AND JEREMIAH WRIGHT, HE WOULD NEVER HAVE GOTTEN THIS FAR
Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | Oct 6, 2008 9:02:22 PM
=======================================
TJ, are you familiar with McCain’s ongoing friendship with G Gordon Liddy?
As Media Matters for America has noted, Liddy served four and a half years in prison in connection with his conviction for his role in the Watergate break-in and the break-in at the office of the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers. Liddy has acknowledged preparing to kill someone during the Ellsberg break-in “if necessary”; plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a “gangland figure” to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap “leftist guerillas” at the 1972 Republican National Convention — a plan he outlined to the Nixon administration using terminology borrowed from the Nazis. (The murder, firebombing, and kidnapping plots were never carried out; the break-ins were.) During the 1990s, Liddy reportedly instructed his radio audience on multiple occasions on how to shoot Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms agents and also reportedly said he had named his shooting targets after Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Liddy has donated $5,000 to McCain’s campaigns since 1998, including $1,000 in February 2008. In addition, McCain has appeared on Liddy’s radio show during the presidential campaign, including as recently as May. An online video labeled “John McCain On The G. Gordon Liddy Show 11/8/07″ includes a discussion between Liddy and McCain, whom Liddy described as an “old friend.” During the segment, McCain praised Liddy’s “adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great,” said he was “proud” of Liddy, and said that “it’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program.”

Posted by: flop sweat express | October 6, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Using McCain’s tax increase counting, McCain increase taxes 13 more times then Obama while Obama was in the senate. 477 times over his entire career.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

“Dow Jones fell 800 points today. What is Obama’s solution?”
Geevil, there will be no solution from Obama. Just like he has solved nothing in Illinois. He will be lost because Obama is a career campaigner. He only knows how to criticize the other guy in office and run for that office. He was senator for 143 days before he announced he was running for president. He could have let the other guy just have the office and run for president. It would have been better for Illinois at least.
But the answer to your question will be Obama will let his puppet masters control everything. See more of Pelosi and Barney and watch the DNC slide into hell.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

DNC Party Crasher: NOW you want to talk about the economy? You were all about Ayers and now I want you to tell us why McCain’s ongoing friendship with Liddy isn’t a problem for you, personally…

Posted by: don't talk about the economy! | October 6, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Gov. Palin speech made DOW dive 273.55 points.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Obama and the DNC tried to dismiss the lawsuit checking the validity of his being a natural born citizen. The judge is requesting Obama supply applicable documents within 3 days as proof. This was done on 10/3. Has Obama supplied these yet? All the above is a moot point if Obama isn’t qualified to be a U.S. President. Philip Berg filed the suit. If he has proof, supply it, end the controversy.

Posted by: sayitso | October 6, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

DNC Party Crasher
The truth of the matter is there is a solution even though you will refuse to admit it. The truth is Obama did fix things in Illinois such as racial profiling and the death penalty. The truth is that Obama did do things in the U.S. Senate such as past laws on Nuclear Proliferation , and Ethics. And he has proposed a plan. But I guess some people have there eyes wide shut.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

It’s doesn’t matter. Obama has won Ohio. The election is over.
Republicans, go find another country to destroy!

Posted by: clifton | October 6, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I could never be friendly with a Nazi, a lyncher, a serial killer, a child rapist, etc.
It sickens me that Obama could dismiss acts Ayers did when he was a kid, as if they don’t matter now, especially when the guy says he should’ve did more to this day.
It’s absolutely a fair hit. It’s all politics. Like Obama’s all hopey changey, right.

Posted by: John | October 6, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I’ll just go with McCain’s questionable acquaintances when he was an adult, like Keating, like his stripper girl friends….
What do you constitute as an adult? In most states it’s 18. Which means Obama met Khalid al-Mansour 20 years ago, when he was 27, or 27. Well past the age of consent. You espouse to his intelligence, and such, and this Khalid is integral in getting Obama into Harvard…so if Obama is such a bright star intellectually, shouldn’t he have known better than to associate with the likes of terrorists, or terrorists supporters?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Obama never said that Wright was his mentor although Fox news (and only Fox news) reported that.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

DNC Party Crasher
Why not?

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

I’m frankly stunnned at McCain’s campaign. Their slogan really should be ‘McCain First’. Palin as VP? The idea that she could be president is deeply offensive to me as person who cares about this country. Then, this prepostorous grandstanding around the economy, trying to avoid the debate and take credit for a bill that didn’t pass after being voted down by McCain’s own party? And now, calling the other side ‘terrorists’? That’s really third-grade stuff. I expected more from McCain, I really did. He’s flip-flopped and behaved disgracefully. Obama has shown himself to be the more honorable person and candidate, and I’ll be voting for him.

Posted by: Tom | October 6, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

It sickens me that Obama could dismiss acts Ayers did when he was a kid, as if they don’t matter now, especially when the guy says he should’ve did more to this day.
Posted by: John | Oct 6, 2008 9:14:38 PM
=====================================
How do you feel about McCain taking money from Keating when he was 57 years old?
How do you feel that McCain has an ongoing friendship with G Gordon Liddy?
Or does none of THAT matter?

Posted by: don't talk about the economy! | October 6, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Rev. Wright is a radical liberal anti American.
William Ayers is a radical liberal anti American.
Father Flager is a radical liberal anti American.
Rashid Khalidi is a radical liberal anti American.
Khalid al-Mansour is a radical liberal anti American.
Birds of a feather, flock together! or is that chickens coming home to roost?
It’s no wonder obama and his wife don’t think that there is anything wrong with these characters, they are just like them.
The media never fully vetted all of these radical liberal anti American connections because they are cowards. They don’t have a shred of objectivity if they don’t investigate now. They sent hundreds of people to Alaska but not one to Chicago.
The media has no credibility or fairness left in them.

Posted by: joey | October 6, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

You mean Obama stole Ohio.
I guarantee you ,after the antics Jennifer Brunner has pulled…there will be an investigation into this as well. She literally told them to turn away, or throw away early voting ballots for McCain.
Tainted Ethics. The Change we’ve all been waiting for.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Let not your heart be troubled folks. Silly season will be over and Barack Obama will be our President.
McCain will be back in the Senate and YES Sarah will be back up in Wasilla shooting moose.
And America can move forward and clean up this mess.

Posted by: Omentum | October 6, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Joey
[Insert Name] is a radical liberal terrorist.
Talking Points Gone Wild!

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Tainted Ethics. The Change we’ve all been waiting for.
Posted by: Jeanie | Oct 6, 2008 9:19:29 PM
—————————————
Indeed, Jeanie!
How do you feel about McCain taking money from Keating when he was 57 years old?
How do you feel that McCain has an ongoing friendship with G Gordon Liddy?
Or does none of THAT matter?

Posted by: don't talk about the economy! | October 6, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I am 49 years old and I am worried about the money I have in the stock market, the dropping value of my home and my 401K amd McCain is talking about a guy that is now a teacher who went crazy in 1968!! Obama was 8 years old and I was 10 and never heard of the Weather men!! Please tell me what McCain is going to do about the economy!!Palin’s not smart enough!

Posted by: Terry | October 6, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

“Can’t really call Bush dumb when the voters are dumber.”
Change, but to what? Thank you for an intelligent comment.
I would not say that the voters are dumb. Just sucked in to the point were there is an absence of asking questions that dominate the narrative. Like they were with Bush. koolAid, drink more it makes me feel good. Illinois will go blue but I know many who voted for Obama as a senator who are not voting for him in this election. And to extend the problematic topic of race to this election just adds to the complexities of the matrix. His record in Illinois is not impressive. the Death Penalty is a very WEAK talking point. Crime here is up 30%. 10people shot dead in Obama’s neighborhood in one weekend.
Like I said. Obama 1 term. It will be like Carter. He had no solutions for Illinois and what is laughable is posters who will argue with you about what is happening in your own state. Now that is drinking Kool Aid, but I guess Obama stinks from Chicago to LA so I guess they get a wiff of something.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Born in Kenya?
Wasn’t McCain born in Panama????
At least Obama was born in a U.S. State.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

“Dow Jones fell 800 points today. What is Obama’s solution?”
Solution:
Lewis Farakah
Jessie Jackson
Al Sharpton
Opra Winfrey
Star Jones
This will be his cabinet and they will help him fix the economy and give us health care and lots of free stuff.

Posted by: Pookie-Pookie | October 6, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“Illinois will go blue but I know many who voted for Obama as a senator who are not voting for him in this election”
Obama is ahead by “only” 30 pts in IL.
PUMA = Fraud

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

John McCain is arrogance, ignorance and mediocrity wrapped in a flag. He was a POW in North Vietnam, but so were over 500 others. He was a terrible student by his own admission and was 884 out of 889 in his graduating class. His largest fame in Congress was for having the worst temper in the Senate, which to be fair, is bipartisan in nature. His success is due to parental position and marrying right the second time and the public’s long held practice of giving military heroes a pass on their competence as government leaders. He can only win by destroying his opponent or trying to pretend he is independent when he backed Bush with over 90% of his votes.

Posted by: bhciapol | October 6, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Let’s hope the truth comes out about whether or not Obama was born in Kenya before the election.
Posted by: Born in Kenya? | Oct 6, 2008 9:19:47 PM
———————————
It’s funny that he has provided his Hawaiian birth certificate, but Sarah Palin won’t provide one for the baby. And there is no announcement at that hospital she had the baby at either… what’s that mean? And her daughter is pregnant (again?).

Posted by: don't talk about the economy! | October 6, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

DNC Party Crasher
If you were paying attention you would realize that the change Obama proposes is concrete. Transparency, Middle Class focus economic policy, Diplomacy… But I guess some peoples eyes are wide shut.

Posted by: MM | October 6, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Jake,
Honestly, I would feel the same way as I feel about the “association”. Neither terrorism nor abortion are my issues to vote on. It’s the economy, stupid!
That, for me, embodies economic fairness in housing and job opportunity. It also pisses me off that the republicans stole everybody’s money from their investments and retirement accounts because Paulson and Cox didn’t do their jobs to protect us as consumers! That’s right… shareholders are consumers in that we buy stock and try to do so wisely.
McCain and his party screwed over us hard-working Americans and we need Obama to get things back in order.
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | October 6, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Obama and the DNC tried to dismiss the lawsuit checking the validity of his being a natural born citizen. The judge is requesting Obama supply applicable documents within 3 days as proof. This was done on 10/3. Has Obama supplied these yet? All the above is a moot point if Obama isn’t qualified to be a U.S. President. Philip Berg filed the suit. If he has proof, supply it, end the controversy.

Posted by: sayitso | October 6, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Hi folks! Hey – still at it?
At the irrelevant BS I mean?
I just saw that FOX gives Obama a 7 point lead in Florida.
So, good luck.
See ya.

Posted by: huckleberry | October 6, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

“Please start with California where the democrats have ruled for 30+ years and have systematically run my state into the ground.”
Would that be the state with a GOP governor for the last 5 years?
Or how about Pete Wilson?
CA has been run into the ground thanks to Prop 13 strangling funding for local governments.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 6, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

McCain is losing,losing,losing and I am happy,happy,happy. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

That would be disturbing. But I’d be a lot more disturbed to learn that McCain’s political career was funded by a) an heiress whose father and uncle were both convicted felons – for crooked dealings with alcohol and racetracks b) McCain had accepted money for lobbying and twisting bills for one of the biggest bank failures in history – one we paid for c) McCain chose an End-of-Days running mate, who had been blessed on camera, by a man who believes the American education system is full of “sorcery and witchcraft” (hey teachers out there – have you had time to cast any spells lately?) and e) McCain chose a running mate who has been married to a man who belonged to a party for a DECADE – (until very recently) that advocated that Alaska secede from the union – by violence, if necessary f) the lies and hatred spread by Palin have drive people to shout death threats at political rallyies in America g) John McCain’s spiritual advisor believes that 70 Million American Catholics are agents of Satan.
By the way, Jake, Obama was 8 or 9. Give it up. How are your college funds today? How’s your job outlook? Got a house? Got any parents that you’ll have to take care of now – when you have no money of your own? Nope. Didn’t think so. Take a bus ride to America. We’ve got more on our moinds than what the Weather Underground was doing while Obama was playing with legos.

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Posted by: Jeanie | Oct 6, 2008 8:39:24 PM
Boy do you sure like to stretch the truth. Obama is not being investigated. McCain’s campaign was handed 9 pages of names of contributors 2 weeks ago by the FEC. The FEC found each name to be in violation of campaign funding. They were told that these were serious violations and that the FEC needs to see where they refunded this money to the donors or explain why they haven’t. So McCain said well they will file to see Obama’s list. Without any proof of any violations they want Obama’s list of names so they can check. They are the ones in trouble and just want to see who contributed to Obama. Story in Washington Post

Posted by: Pat | October 6, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Honestly, I would feel the same way as I feel about the “association”. Neither terrorism nor abortion are my issues to vote on. It’s the economy, stupid!
===
Does anyone wonder why comments that actually make sense are drowned out by noise and more noise? I don’t. McCain is definitely getting his money’s worth. It would be very nice to see the opposite. For every off topic, slanderous comment posted, three positive ones should follow. Let’s begin to have a real discussion…and some fun. Shall we?

Posted by: Debbie | October 6, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Mack – Start naming some liberals who support the Weather Underground – and the Ayers. With facts. And references. You can’t. They don’t exist.

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

DNC Party Crasher you’re a bit of a hypocrite.
How do you feel about McCain taking money from Keating when he was 57 years old?
How do you feel that McCain has an ongoing friendship with G Gordon Liddy?
Or does none of THAT matter?

Posted by: don't talk about the economy! | October 6, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

MM speak for yourself. My eyes are wide open right here in Illinois.
CHICAGO (CBS) ― An estimated 123 people were shot and killed over the summer. That’s nearly double the number of soldiers killed in Iraq over the same time period.
In May, cbs2chicago.com began tracking city shootings and posting them on Google maps. Information compiled from our reporters, wire service reports and the Chicago Police Major Incidents log indicated that 123 people were shot and killed throughout the city between the start of Memorial Day weekend on May 26, and the end of Labor Day on Sept. 1.
According to the Defense Department, 65 soldiers were killed in combat in Iraq. About the same number were killed in Afghanistan over that same period.
In the same time period, an estimated 245 people were shot and wounded in the city.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

The questions about Dude Palin’s affiliations with accessionist groups and McCain’s associations with the founder of the hate group that supplied the guerillas with weapons in the Iran Contra scandal… same as Ayers, but the media isn’t cramming that part down America’s throats.
Neither of these situations is relevant, but smearing should be equally applied to all candidates and candidate’s associations.
I’m glad Obama is fighting back.
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | October 6, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Not sure why McCain cares about Ayers. His Senate record makes it clear he is in favor of domestic terrorism.
John McCain, in a 69-30 Senate vote, voted against a Federal law to prohibit bombings, arson and bloodshed at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses. This was not some obscure rider to a bill on some unrelated topic, this was a stand-alone bill (NYT,11/17/93).

Posted by: Paige | October 6, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Obama continues to lie and show that he is any “empty suit with no substance.” He is an association of Ayers, even Ayers admitted today that he bombed the Pentagon and that he and Obama are friends. Obama flip flops and thinks he’s president already. Keep attacking, President McCain! America does not want Obama!

Posted by: david from texas | October 6, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Ah, people, McCain was born in Panama! Not the USA last I checked. There is still some confusion over whether HE is legally eligible to run for POTUS. MCCain has been given a pass on everything–including his co-operation with the Vietcong during his captivity. The guy is pathetic.

Posted by: April Campbell | October 6, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

The Republican party will take us into more war and damage the economy further. McCain loves war too much for my taste..all he talks about is the surge in Iraq..why can’t he talk about a surge in our economy? This guy who owns 9 houses and 13 cars is out of touch with regular people(Most voters are regular people). Thank God Americans are getting wise to the dirty politics of the Republicans..McCain is losing in every State and that’s great! Let us turn this ship around and strengthen our economy. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

McCain/Palin- Nothing but chewing gum for your ears.

Posted by: Paige | October 6, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Change, but to what,
Don’t you think that WE should care if a 90 year old woman is so distraught over a mortgage that she injures herself??? My God! What have we become?
Banks have stopped lending to banks. People are losing their jobs, homes and minds, and the only response is McCain doesn’t care. Thank God that God does, and maybe we should too! Don’t you think. Please, in the future, do not respond to my posts. Thank you.

Posted by: Addie | October 6, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

– Voting against making anti-choice violence a federal crime. As the Jed Report notes, McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.
– Opposing Colorado’s “Bubble Law.” McCain said he opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics [Denver Post, 2/27/00]. The law was later upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
– Voting to allow those fined for violence at clinics to avoid penalties by declaring bankruptcy. NARAL Pro-Chioce America notes that McCain “voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.”

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Hussein – I was brutally tortured by a Vietnam Vet – with a bad drug habit – you can find the records in a sheriff’s department in the California Central Coast. I’ve never used that information to get a job. I could stand on my own record.
What about all those guys who didn’t come home? From Hanoi or from Vietnam? John McCain has the right to talk about Veterans when he starts supporting them. His record is far lower than most Democrats. Disabled Vietnam Vets report his voting record at 20% – that’s the percentage of votes that he has taken in Congress to support men and woman who came back in pieces from Vietnam. He voted for waterboarding – months after he said he never would. He voted against the GI Bill – and most kids went to Iraq because they thought it would get them out of dead end towns and get them an education. It was a betrayal – one of many this year. Whatever honor John McCain once had, he sold it long ago.

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The fact that John McCain, voted against a bill that would have resulted in a Federal law to prohibit bombings, arson and bloodshed at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses makes him a supporter of domestic terrorism! And Sarah Palin’s associations with Alaskan Independence Party makes her a supporter of secessionist groups! How can this pair be trusted to defend America and uphold the American constitution?

Posted by: Jane Sixpack | October 6, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

DNC Party Crasher -
In 1994, John McCain voted against legislation — pushed through Congress by Joe Biden — that helped put an end to the practice of charging rape victims for sexual assault exams.
Twisted as it may sound, charging victims for a forensic exam was a real problem. For example, as AMERICAblog has documented (and the media is now reporting), when Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the town charged rape victims for the exams.

Posted by: Paige | October 6, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Jake. Did you delete my post because it asked people to compare the old news footage video of William Ayers and the new reunion video of William Ayers and his wife? Is it not fair for people to draw their own conclusions?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 6, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

ARE YOU BETTER OFF THEN YOU WERE EIGHT YEARS AGO ?
IS THE AMERICAN ECONOMY BETTER OFF NOW THAN IT WAS EIGHT YEARS AGO ?
IF THE ANSWER IS NO…
VOTE OBAMA 08
VOTE FOR THE GUY OFFERING SOLUTIONS NOT THE OLD MAN OFFERING SMEERS!

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

“I’m an Alaskan, not an American. I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.” Then there’s “The fires of hell are glaciers compared to my hate for the American government.” And “The problem with you John Birchers is that you are too damn liberal!”
Joe Volger, founder of the Alaskan Independence Party – which Todd Palin belonged to from 1995 to 2002 as a registered member – and which Sarah Palin said she was “proud” to welcome to her town.

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Our senior citizens in this country are loyal voters and when you hear those senior citizens in Florida, Ohio and other states who voted Republican traditionally say that they are now voting for Obama, you know the show is over for McSame. The fat lady is about to enter the stage to sing the song “Hit the road Jack”. Bye Bye McCain! Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Excellent article, Jake. It’s about time someone put the shoe on the other foot.

Posted by: Emm | October 6, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Paige why are you addressing me?
You have the wrong poster.

Posted by: DNC Party Crasher | October 6, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Here is my theme song for all you out of touch McCain/Palin supporters. Ray Charles “Hit the road Jack”. The only people who supports McCain/Palin are really rich people and a few poor people who pretend to be rich..McCain is losing in all the States and that is like heaven to my ears..loser, loser,loser! ha ha ha! Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

IN OTHER NEWS THE DOW PLUNGES…
6 OF 10 AMERICANS SAY DEPRESSION IS “LIKELY”…
EBAY FIRES 10% OF ITS STAFF…
JOBLOSES AT HIGHEST LEAVES IN DECADES…
700 000 JOBS LOST THIS YEAR…
ECONOMISTS: MORE LOSES TO COME…

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

“For example, as AMERICAblog has documented (and the media is now reporting), when Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the town charged rape victims for the exams.”
Ridiculous. No credible proof that says Palin charged for rape kits. Take the blinders off.

Posted by: Emm | October 6, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Heard a bank loan officer on radio say the phones were not ringing. Had 1M dollars set aside to loan each month but no was calling to apply. This money was set aside by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each month. Wonder if we are getting the wrong message from the media. Think this is a game being played with our money.

Posted by: Surfside | October 6, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I am a democrat and for years democrats have loved McCain because he was not like the other republicans. He is in now way anything like Bush.
That being said I would rather keep bush in office then chance Obama’s version of change. Obama is a scary man with ties to racists, slumlords, and terrorists. Obama was only in the senate for less than 1 year when he started running for office. In that short time in the senate he didn’t show up for 46% of the votes. He changes position depending on what the poles say.
I do not trust Obama.
I am a life long democrat who will be voting for McCain/Palin

Posted by: mark | October 6, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Jake,
Asking questions that the rest in the press, who are almost all in the tank for Obama, are afraid or too biased to ask.
Keep it up.

Posted by: Ike Marks | October 6, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I just found more respect for the guy that wrote the article. If it was the other way around I think it would be unfair for Barack Obama to bring it up, but that would probably not change my mind to vote for him.

Posted by: Kathy | October 6, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I am a democrat and for years democrats have loved McCain because he was not like the other republicans. He is in now way anything like Bush.
That being said I would rather keep bush in office then chance Obama’s version of change. Obama is a scary man with ties to racists, slumlords, and terrorists. Obama was only in the senate for less than 1 year when he started running for office. In that short time in the senate he didn’t show up for 46% of the votes. He changes position depending on what the poles say.
I do not trust Obama.
I am a life long democrat who will be voting for McCain/Palin
Posted by: mark | Oct 6, 2008 9:50:40 PM
I totally agree with you, Mark!

Posted by: david from texas | October 6, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Also,
Research John McCain and Rafaello Follieri and John McCain and David Ifshin

Posted by: mark flowers | October 6, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

McCain does have real connections to abortion clinic bombers as well as to racists and criminals, but McCain is white and therefore assumed to be “safe.”
Obama is the first major black presidential candidate, so they are naturally trying to make him out to be “scary.”
The latent racism in America and in these attacks is not often talked about, but it is a real problem regardless.
There is also a problem with blatant racism, such as from McCain campaign county chair Bobby May in Virginia, which the media also doesn’t want to talk about.

Posted by: Sarah | October 6, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Surfside,
Yes. Economic fairness has everthing to do with demonizing the politicians that made fairness a priority. The bigots never wanted *that to happen, so they schemed up their demise and toppled good companies over political partisanship.
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | October 6, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Umm.. Jake?
Have you not been seeing the questions asked about McCain and Palin over the last few months? About far less substantive issues than associations with terrorists and USA-hating ministers like Wright.
The lack of journalistic integrity is truly frightening….

Posted by: Michelle | October 6, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

After watergate, America was ready for change.That change was Jimmy Carter.
Kind of prophetic, isn’t it?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Fact is Obama is not winning among anyone, the vote has not been held yet. McCain is making his move, theme of Country First, Obama clearly puts himself and his political interests first, he’s been paid 100s of thousands of dollars and 4 million on a book, but has no accomplishments (oh, yeah, he was a Community Organizer). So exactly why do you trust this guy?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

While we are on the topic of looking at past and current associations of presidential and vice-presidential candidates, let me remind folks that the Wasilla Bible Church, which Sarah and Todd Palin have attended for nearly 20 years, gave its pulpit over to a figure viewed with deep hostility by many Jewish organizations: David Brickner, the executive director of Jews for Jesus.
Palin’s pastor, Larry Kroon, introduced Brickner on Aug. 17, according to a transcript of the sermon on the church’s website.
“He’s a leader of Jews for Jesus, a ministry that is out on the leading edge in a pressing, demanding area of witnessing and evangelism,” Kroon said.
Brickner then explained that Jesus and his disciples were themselves Jewish.
“The Jewish community, in particular, has a difficult time understanding this reality,” he said.
Brickner’s mission has drawn wide criticism from the organized Jewish community, and the Anti-Defamation League accused them in a report of “targeting Jews for conversion with subterfuge and deception.”
Brickner also described terrorist attacks on Israelis as God’s “judgment of unbelief” of Jews who haven’t embraced Christianity.
Here is a lesson for Sarah Palin and John McCain. If you live in a glass house, don’t throw stones at others.

Posted by: Jane Sixpack | October 6, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

The lack of journalistic integrity is truly frightening….
Posted by: Michelle | Oct 6, 2008 9:56:51 PM
Your exactly right! It’s frightening that the media has been in the tank for the idiot Obama these past months!

Posted by: david from texas | October 6, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Who was the McCain campaign genius who opened this can of worms? Beyond Cindy’s sordid family, Plain’s blessing by the witch-hunter, McCain’s spiritual advisor who hates Catholics, the Keating Five, the Alaska Independence Party, we have the REALLY creepy Gordon Liddy. He’s given money to McCain (a whole lot more than $200), hosted parties at this home for McCain (1998), and McCain went on his show and said “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family” When the Branch Davidians went crazy, in 1994 – not 1968 – John McCain’s close friend advised: “Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests. … Kill the SOBs.” The censors won’t allow a source – but this comes from one of the top five US papers – one owned by a conservative Republican.

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Stanley, go back to the primaries and read my posts. I have always supported Hillary Clinton…but when she was “robbed” of the nomination by this idiot Obammmy and his cohearts, Pelosi, Dean, and Reid…I refused to support him. I would rather McCain than this liar Obama, anyday! Stanley, get a life!

Posted by: david from texas | October 6, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I don’t have much respect for anyone who would vote to keep Republicans in power after 8 years of Bush/Cheney.

Posted by: Sarah | October 6, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Sarah said: The latent racism in America and in these attacks is not often talked about, but it is a real problem regardless.
I am so sick to death of that weak argument, that every time, someone questions anything Barack says, does, did, will do, or is doing, as racist.
I am not voting for him because he is a small percentage black, a larger portion white, and the other portion arab….I am not voting for him simply because I do not trust him, nor do I agree with his ideologies.
I would however have voted for Colin Powell when we thought he would run a few years back, and if Condoleeza Rice had thrown her hat into the ring, I would vote for her as well. This is not about race, and I resent, and am offended that you make it about race.
If you’re so concerned about this as an issue, then why do you support a party, where a sitting Senator was once a member of the KKK?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Judging by a lot of comments posted, there are a lot of strange people out there. If McCain had as many and as close associations to terrorists and America hating radicals with socialist leanings as Obama does, I would not vote for him either. But he doesn’t, so all your
theoretical liberal justifications to try to explain away
questionable behavior are just that. There are too many such things in Obama’s background and too many inconsistencies, too many unanswered questions. And “That is above my pay grade” is
just not good enough, when you are running for the highest office in the country.

Posted by: Indiana resident | October 6, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

What’s next? McCain’s inability to keep an airplane actually in the air? The difference between an academic Law professor and a Law Professor?
This country is in trouble, boys and girls. Do something about it. Make a start with discussing the issues that demand good solutions. And vote for the brightest, toughest and most honest candidate please. Our country is going to need it.

Posted by: haring | October 6, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Surfside,
Yes. Economic fairness has everthing to do with demonizing the politicians that made fairness a priority. The bigots never wanted *that to happen, so they schemed up their demise and toppled good companies over political partisanship.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | Oct 6, 2008 9:55:20 PM
McCain/Palin ’08.

Posted by: Surfside | October 6, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Johnjr, Borrow one of McCain’s 13 cars and go away. Its Obama in November whether you like it or not! You Republicans are in a dream world. Have you been reading lately about the polls and what people has been saying around the country and the world? Your Messiah McCain is on the way out John! OUT! Get it? OUT! Now go put down the Koolaid and go vote Obama. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Your boy McCain isn’t a clean as he portrays himself to be. Please google McCain and Liddy and see what you come up with. Liddy after all is a convict whereas Ayers is not.

Posted by: Gwen | October 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Thanks, Jake, for the shoe on the other foot scenario. As you imply, in those circumstances, the Dems would be howling for McCain’s head.
Would have been nice if media types had taken an interest in these shady characters in Obama’s life earlier, though. I’m sure Hillary thinks so, too.

Posted by: GetReal | October 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Thanks, Jake, for the shoe on the other foot scenario. As you imply, in those circumstances, the Dems would be howling for McCain’s head.
Would have been nice if media types had taken an interest in these shady characters in Obama’s life earlier, though. I’m sure Hillary thinks so, too.

Posted by: GetReal | October 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Of course this is about desperation for McCain. Did we see this amount of stuff on Ayers back in September or August when McCain was surging? It’s all dirty politics (just like Obama’s harsh counterattack with Keating Five).

Posted by: matt | October 6, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

As reported in the Economist magazine a few days ago, a poll of American economists found that they overwhelming agree that John McCain’s economic policies would be “bad” or “very bad.”
They also overwhelming agree that Barack Obama’s economic plans would be better for us.
Please listen to the experts before it’s too late.

Posted by: Sarah | October 6, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

hahahaha
McCain the Erratic will lose

Posted by: Omentum | October 6, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

McCain:
If you do not believe as I do you are unamerican. You are not like us.
Who is us?

Posted by: mark | October 6, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

McCain:
If you do not believe as I do you are unamerican. You are not like us.
Who is us?

Posted by: mark | October 6, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Telling the truth about Obama is not smearing, it’s simply the truth others have ignored until now. But, because Obama keeps saying he isn’t Bush he will end up in the White House. Unfortunately what he isn’t telling people is who he is, so I’m glad others are doing it for him. It won’t take long for people to know that we put someone who hates America in the White House.

Posted by: debbie | October 6, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Obama has remained secretive & has been misleading about is associations with Ayers. One of Obama’s key men stated that they were “most certainly friendly” and then most recently that statement changed to the fact that “he barely knew the guy”. The mainstream media has painted a picture of the McCain campain using this as a last ditch effort to gain votes, but never points out the fact that Obama was a key member of one of Ayer’s educational projects in which he was reponsible for managing Ayers’ money…..to me that is a heck of a deeper relationship than “barely knowing the guy”! The issue is that he used poor judgement in his association with an unrepentant domestic terrorist AND then he chose to be less than honest about it!

Posted by: Sara | October 6, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

David from texas, let me share a little secret with you! “They all lie..they are politicians”. Where have you been to be so enthralled by McCain to even imply that he does not lie..you are sheltered or you are drinking too much of that spiked Republican koolaid. I would rather vote for a liar who would focus on the economy than a liar who is only interested in the surge in Iraq and fighting more wars..that’s all McCain talks about..the surge in Iraq..What about talking about the surge in our economy? But then again the guy said some months ago that he does not know much about the economy..why would I vote for a guy who does’nt care about the economy. McCain is out of touch with the ordinary man/woman..he just wants to be president! Obama wants to make a difference and he will. Americans are now seeing through the crap of the Republican party..they have nothing to offer by David from texas and Johnjr. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 6, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Remember the 60s song with the words – where have all the good men gone…I need a hero..” Well, Barack Obama, please step right up because if ever we needed one in our history, this is the moment of reckoning!
Have we all lost our minds? Lost the meaning of our constitution? Thrown in our sense of decency? Are we really as lost as the so-called Ayers association would have us believe? This is not politics gone awry, this borders on insanity and as a former investigative television correspondent, the media is as much to blame as anyone.
Are we supposed to believe, that because Obama served on one of the most widely respected, internationally renowned foundation boards with an individual who was involved in a movement some 40+ years ago, never convicted of a crime, and leading a fairly respectable, intellectual, reasonable life, that he is somehow guilty by association?
Does this mean that we an individuals, have never crossed paths with someone who has been in prison; we have never encountered and spoken with someone who has used illegal drugs; that we shun all those whose past is not lily white, that we only associate with people who have never told a lie, committed a crime, cheated on a test, cheated on their spouse – you get the point.
Show me a perfect person and I’ll show you the emperor’s new clothes.
So here we are, in the midst of the greatest international financial crisis; here we are in a war that is taking thousands of young lives and costing trillions of dollars. Here we are in the midst of one of the most dangerous times in history and we are being given hope of a new kind of leadership. And all we can do is talk about a relatively insignificant individual, whose long ago views may differ from Sarah Palin’s, and this is somehow significant and important.
If this is where we are in our society, journalists like Jake included, then clearly, we are getting everything we deserve. But it is our hope, that we can be better than this. One can only hope.

Posted by: J. Rose | October 6, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Stanley said: I would rather vote for a liar who would focus on the economy than a liar who is only interested in the surge in Iraq and fighting more wars..
Umm in case you didn’t see the first debate…Obama is interested too. He is going to turn troops over to Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

The question asked was this:
“And what if Obama started attacking McCain about this guy.
How would it look to you? How would the media react? And would it be a fair hit?”
Absolutely it would be a fair hit. Every single person running for president should have his background thoroughly checked, no matter how late in the political game. If McCain had a person like Ayers in his past, I would want to know all about it.
No partisan politics here – just the plain, hard, cold facts – for EVERY candidate.

Posted by: RetroGal1942 | October 6, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

It seems like the newman missed the most disturbing story of the day – and it isn’t what someone did when obama was nine. in a political rally with sarah palin today, one of her supporters shouted “kill him” meaning a nominee for the presidency of the United States. this woman – who was chosen because she is evangelical – and professes to be christian – did not say “enough”. she did not say “i don’t hold with that kind of thinking”. she said nothing at all – and only continued to goad the people on. this is a christian?

Posted by: mara | October 6, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

To put it bluntly, Jake, it’s a lousy analogy.
Abortion providers are *currently* at risk from violent groups and individuals. If McCain were friends with someone such as you describe, that person could easily use his new forum to incite bombings and murders *in the present* (since he thought his own bombing was a nifty idea and presumably would say so in his new venue).
There are *not* currently groups such as the Weather Underground or SDS hatching violent antiwar protests. Two of my older sibs were in college during the height of the Vietnam protests, Kent State, the student strike. They bemoan the lack of energy and organization (though *not* the lack of violence) in protests against the Iraq War. The atmosphere is entirely different now. Ayres has *not* said he thinks anyone should *now* go bomb the Pentagon to protest *this* war. There’s no organizational structure to act on any such suggestion, anyway.
Not analogous.
A more appropriate analogy would be: What if McCain were friends with, accepted a contribution from, and launched his political career in the living room of one of the National Guardsmen who shot one of the kids at Kent State? And what if that former National Guardsman were unrepentant about the killings, thought those kids deserved to be shot and killed, but no charges were ever brought, and he now had an unrelated career?
Would it matter? Would that make McCain a proponent of shooting and killing antiwar demonstrators on sight? Would it make him unfit for office?
There’s your analogy, Jake.

Posted by: Jill Nikolaides | October 6, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Check out this excerpt from the article on fair.org about Gordon Liddy’s advocacy of domestic terrorism. Now Gordon Liddy is a close associate of John McCain, has hosted fundraising parties for John McCain, and has given money to John McCain’s campaign. This is much more serious than the crossing of paths between Obama and Ayers.
On August 26, 1994, Liddy told his radio listeners: “Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests.” Liddy’s advice that day was explicit: “They’ve got a big target on there, ATF. Don’t shoot at that, because they’ve got a vest on underneath that. Head shots, head shots…. Kill the sons of bitches.”
This was far from an isolated incident. On September 15, 1994, for example, Liddy told his listeners: “If the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms insists upon a firefight, give them a firefight. Just remember, they’re wearing flak jackets and you’re better off shooting for the head.” The theme was repeated so often that Liddy’s callers began to exclaim “head shots!” to express their agreement with the host, the way Rush Limbaugh’s callers say “megadittos.”
After Liddy’s talk of shooting federal agents received media attention, in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing (London Independent, 4/24/95), some stations dropped Liddy’s program. In a press conference responding to the controversy (Associated Press, 4/25/95), Liddy clarified his advice by noting that shooting a federal agent in the head might not be the ideal plan: “So you shoot twice to the body, center of mass, and if that does not work, then shoot to the groin area.”

Posted by: jane sixpack | October 6, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

JRose said: So here we are, in the midst of the greatest international financial crisis;
Yes. And Obama was complicit in this finanacial fall out, going back to his days with ACORN!!! Now tell me why, when he was part of the problem, is he going to be the solution to it?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

DNC Party Crasher you posted a LONG cut and pasted article that included this statement:
“Relatives of Mya Lyons say police told them the girl was slashed in the neck and abdomen and had been sexually assaulted.”
_____________________________________________’
Your beloved candidate voted AGAINST the Violence Against Women Act.
The act provided federal funds to programs focused on preventing domestic violence and sexual assault through local, state and federal agencies, along with compliance rules for accepting federal funds. Marital rape and date rape, for example, carried lesser penalties for assailants than stranger rape, a gross implication that certain kinds of assault were more acceptable. Moreover, because most women are assaulted by acquaintances, the most common form of rape was the least policed and punished. As recent examples from election coverage suggest, the rules guiding VAWA funding are still necessary to protect rape victims from being treated as second-class citizens under the law. Sarah Palin broke these rules as mayor of Wasilla when she charged sexual assault victims for rape kits.

Posted by: Paige | October 6, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

As far as I know the MSM has kept pretty if not totally silent about McCain serving on the board of the U.S. Council for World Freedom, to name an example.
The U.S. Council for World Freedom was chaired by John Singlaub who wound up involved in the Iran Contra scandal. It was an ultra conservative right-wing group.
The Council was affiliated with the so called World Anti-Communist League, an infamous gathering place and point of contact for extremists, racist and anti-Semites.
So… where IS the MSM’s outrage on this?
See, Republicans, you got it all wrong. McCain has got the free ride, while Obama was questioned about Ayers in the ABC debate for instance, grilled about Rev Wright everywhere, etc.
Same was true for Hillary Clinton in the primaries, btw. No one in the MSM brought up the large Whitewater scandal (chockful of “rezko’s”) against Hillary’s candidacy, while everyone was writing about that single “boneheaded mistake” by Obama when it comes to real estate: Rezko. The Clintons had many many more of such affairs in their closet.
The greatest lie about these presidential elections is that Obama was handled gently by the MSM.

Posted by: freak | October 6, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

As far as politicans go Obama is clean. These claims are bogus, people recognize that that’s why everytime they are brought up they quickly fade away.
Vote NO on Prop 8 in California. The Constition is about giving rights not taking them away.

Posted by: NO on 8 | October 6, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Oh now, Mr. Tapper, don’t confuse the poor little dears. You’re posting “imagine if” things that just do not compute for them. Sad thing is, they’re the mirror image of the radical regressives, but they’ll never see that.

Posted by: Qunicy | October 6, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Obama is a mystery says Bored on the Right
________________________________________________
Actually, Mccain is the biggest mystery. Sometime between 2000 and 2008, he became a completely different person. The McCain of 2000 – admirable. The McCain of 2008 – sad.

Posted by: Paige | October 6, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Jake, this is an excellent blog question. I have no doubt that if this scenario was true, Obama and the media would go after Mccain.

Posted by: Tina | October 6, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

No on 8 said: Vote NO on Prop 8 in California. The Constition is about giving rights not taking them away.
Didn’t Biden say at the debate, that he and Obama were against same sex marriages? I’m pretty sure he did. Hmmmmmmmmmm.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

No on 8 said: Vote NO on Prop 8 in California. The Constition is about giving rights not taking them away.
Didn’t Biden say at the debate, that he and Obama were against same sex marriages? I’m pretty sure he did. Hmmmmmmmmmm.
Posted by: Jeanie | Oct 6, 2008 10:31:52 PM
Biden said that he and Obama were definitely “against same sex marriages” in the debate! Hmmmmmm…..!

Posted by: carpe' diem | October 6, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Palin Charge:
“I’m afraid this someone who sees America as imperfect enough to work with a former domestic terrorist who had targeted his own country.”
Saddam was our friend vs. Iran in 1980s, then our enemy.
Qadaffi was our enemy and now is our friend.
North Korea was our enemy and we are trying to be their friend now.
This is only recent history . . . this is policy is policy of the US Govt. Ayers if he killed anybody, killed far fewer Americans than these guys.

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

The World Anti-Communist League was described by former member Geoffrey Stewart-Smith as “largely a collection of Nazis, Fascists, anti-Semites, sellers of forgeries, vicious racialists, and corrupt self-seekers.”
Thanks, freak, for your post on McCain’s ties to this League as a board member of the VERY suspicious U.S. Council for World Freedom.
You’re totally right of course. The MSM is totally silent about it. Maybe that boring refrain about the “leftist and elitist” MSM is simply a cover up for a much more plausible fact: the MSM is run by billionaire companies such as… Disney! Please draw your conclusions from that.

Posted by: kingston | October 6, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

John McCain had a long association with Charles Keating who’d stole money from elderly seniors investor known as the Saving & Loan Association Scandal that cost American tax payer an estimated between $160.1 billion to $124.6 billion. I think people would say, “For McCain, history keeps repeating itself.”
What about Wall Street, McCain??? Sound familiar??
Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 6, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Hey SisterDearest,
And previously Obama said that was not relevant and he would not be bringing it up. Doesn’t that make Obama a LIAR? Perhaps it’s OK to lie in the new left context. Not in my book.
Oh, and while we’re at it, what about public financing. Doesn’t this also make Obama a LIAR? Perhaps there’s a new definition of lying when it comes to the arrogant wing of the Democratic Party. I’m ashamed to be a Democrat these days. I do wish Hillary were back, though.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 6, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Democrats, stop discussing all this!!! McCain wins if he gets us discussing this crap, abortion clinics, Ayers, etc. It’s the economy stupid and McCain doesn’t want us to discuss that. McCain supported deregulation. Republicans got us into this mess. I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR ANOTHER REPUBLICAN NOT EVEN ON THE LOCAL OR COUNTY LEVEL.

Posted by: MJ Donaldson | October 6, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

sister dearest said: John McCain had a long association with Charles Keating who’d stole money from elderly seniors investor known as the Saving & Loan Association Scandal that cost American tax payer an estimated between $160.1 billion to $124.6 billion. I think people would say, “For McCain, history keeps repeating itself.”
Sister, McCain was exonerated, and the prosecutor went so far as to say he never should have been brought up on charges.
Obama up until now, has hardly been vetted over his associations, and should have been months ago. Because he wasn’t, Hillary lost, and he won. So who helped this to happen?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

McCain Strategist: “If We Keep Talking About The Economic Crisis, We’re Going To Lose”

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

WestCoastMessenger
If you are not going to vote for anyone who changed their mind or said something untrue during a campaign, then you aren’t going to be voting for anyone, including Hillary Clinton.
Get over it.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

OxyCon
Then how come so many white people attend Trinity Church and feel welcomed?
Did Sean Hannity not tell you what to say about that?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Jeanie
McCain may have been more or less “exonerated,” but Obama has never even been charged for anything. Oh, but I’m sure you think he MUST be guilty of something. Why?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

It’s getting McNasty again.
McCain’s course correction reflects a growing case of nerves within his high command as the electoral map has shifted significantly in Obama’s favor in the past two weeks.
“It’s a dangerous road, but we have no choice,” a top McCain strategist told the Daily News. “If we keep talking about the economic crisis, we’re going to lose.”

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Ya know…I know it’s like trying to reason with a cookie, but here goes.
Say what you will about Sean Hannity. He is a commentator, not a journalist. Yet in all this time, he was the ONLY one to investigate Obama properly, the way Mrs. Palin has been investigated.
For months the msm’s conspired to hide, delude, change, ignore, or spin anything, and everything, when it came to negatives about Obama.
That being said….there is a man that helped Obama get into Harvard, and this man is on video spewing white hate. Wanting to cut off noses, and ears….and take out flesh. IF this kind of thing doesn’t at the very least trigger a lil curiosity into doing some research….then all that has been said, can be said, and we risk our own peril.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 6, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

McCain leads with people without college educations, non-managers making less than $50k. That explains the ignorance of the republican posts here.

Posted by: mudge007 | October 6, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Unfortunately, any lessons McCain learned from the Keating scandal didn’t affect McCain’s unbridled enthusiasm for deregulating the finance industry.
“He continues to follow policies that create the same kind of environment we see today, with recurrent financial crises and epidemics of fraud led by CEOs,” says Black, the former S&L regulator.
Indeed, if the current financial crisis has a villain, it is Phil Gramm, who remains close to McCain. As chair of the Senate Banking Committee in the late 1990s, Gramm ushered in — with McCain’s fervent support — a massive wave of deregulation for insurance companies and brokerage houses and banks, the aftershocks of which are just now being felt in Wall Street’s catastrophic collapse.
McCain, who has admitted that “the issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should,” relies on Gramm to guide him.

Posted by: More good news for McCain | October 6, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Keating contributed $54,000 to McCain’s Senate campaign. So when Keating tried to stack the federal regulatory bank board with cronies, McCain made a phone call seeking to push them through.
In 1987, in an unprecedented display of political intimidation, McCain also attended meetings convened by Keating to pressure federal regulators to back off.
“Senate historians were unable to find any instance in U.S. history that was comparable, in terms of five U.S. senators meeting with a regulator on behalf of one institution,” says Bill Black, then deputy director of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, who attended the second meeting. “And it hasn’t happened since.”
Following the meetings with McCain, the regulators backed off, stalling their investigation of Lincoln. By the time the S&L collapsed two years later, taxpayers were on the hook for $3.4 billion, which stood as a record for the most expensive bank failure — until the current mortgage crisis. In addition, 20,000 investors who had bought junk bonds from Keating, thinking they were federally insured, had their savings wiped out.
“McCain saw the political pressure on the regulators,” recalls Black. “He could have saved these widows from losing their life savings. But he did absolutely nothing.”

Posted by: More good news for McCain | October 6, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

McCain was exonerated of wrongdoing in his close relationship with keating, who was convicted and went to jail. They actually vacationed together.
Ayers was never convicted.
You mean to tell me that that rat liberal Mayor Daley has consulted with Ayers for the last 10-15 years?
So Mayor Daley pals around with terrorists? Tell him to his face.
Looks like a wash to me……with Obama coming out on top.

Posted by: vrob125 | October 6, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

the way Mrs. Palin has been investigated.
Palin hasnt been investergated yet theres a million question yet to be asked shes done to real interviews and came off as an airhead! she’s done one debate and read he lines ok with her cheesey say it at so and the you go agains!
When will she do a press conference ?
When will she answer questions ?
When will she answer questions in Alaska ?
When will Todd palin answer questions in Alaska ?
When will she answer truthfully about her ties to the Alaskan Independence Party ?
When will she tell the truth about her record on the bridge to nowhere ?
When will she admit she didnt sell the plane on Ebay ?
When will she admit that she was the person who made woman pay for the Rape kits?
When will she tell the American people the reason she charged woman for the rape kits ?
Did you know the reason she made woman pay for rape kits is because they contain the morning after pill ????
Palin has many questions to answer!

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

WestCoastMessenger!!
I guess it is alright for McCain to help out his friend, Charles Keating!!!
What about the 23,000 elderly senior investor who were defauded and lost their life savings and the American tax payers picked up the tab for the Saving and Loan Scandal!!
Now, here we go again with Wall Street, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with McCain at the fore front!! McCain is the liar putting out 100% negative ads against Obama!!!
Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 6, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Which candidate is CURRENTLY under investigation for ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE POWER?
Which candidate is ducking subpoenas? (Just like Cheney)
Which candidate is hampering a BI-PARTISAN investigation?
Which candidate wants the results of that investigation kept from the public?
Which candidate has used the power of the office to settle personal vendettas?
Which candidate hired unqulaified friends for government positions? (Just like Bush hiring Brown to run FIMA)
Which candidate had $87,000 in income myteriously disappear from her tax form?
Just curious. I know I heard something about these things in the local Ankorage paper.

Posted by: Who is that again? | October 6, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Honestly, there is a simple solution for McCain to make a come back against Obama. Turn away from nasty attacks, and turn some positive attention to himself. He can do this by consulting with his main economics advisor, Phil Gramm, and coming up with a comprehensive and detailed economic recovery plan for the nation. We all wait anxiously for him to take the time to do so. While he’s at it, he could make up ground by comprehensively pointing out how any of his planned mavericky policies that he has thus far laid out are different from what his ole buddy Bush has supported over the last 8 disasterous years. Don’t hold your breath on old McNasty doing the right thing. He’s just not bright enough, and he prefers spewing hate and other mavericky and wacky crap everyday just to mess with our heads. Did I mention the poor guy is unstable?

Posted by: Jack | October 6, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

THEN
2001: “I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans.”
NOW
2007: “I will not let the Democrats roll back the Bush tax cuts.”
2008: “I think that what we need is more tax cuts.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

To all John McCain supporters:
Please do not fault all the “lambs” out there. Blame the media for having greed and a motive to break headline news for a historical event. Their blatant sway of the less fortunate not bless with common sense is both sad and amazing.
When the dust settles and good or bad prevails, I can only hope the media will be held accountable for their obtrusive interference.

Posted by: Marie | October 6, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

THEN
2006: Wrote McCain-Kennedy bill, which would have given 11 million illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.
NOW
Jan. 2008: In GOP primary debate, was asked whether he would still vote for his own bill: “No, I would not.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

How about Obama & Biden talk about a vice presidential candidate who views America so differently from the rest of us that she & her husband supported an organisation that was so anti-American it wanted its State to seceed from the Union.

Posted by: Tambo | October 6, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

THEN
March 2008: Told The Wall Street Journal, “I’m always for less regulation.” Called for “removing regulatory, accounting and tax impediments” to financial markets.
NOW
Sept. 2008: As Wall Street melted down, declared, “We’re going to enact and enforce reforms to make sure that these outrages never happen in the first place.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

THEN
2007: “It was used in the Spanish Inquisition, it was used in Pol Pot’s genocide in Cambodia, and there are reports that it is being used against Buddhist monks today….It is torture.”
NOW
2008: Voted against bill that would prevent waterboarding by requiring all U.S. interrogators to comply with legal standards imposed by the Army Field Manual.

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

THEN
2000: Favored “normalization of relations” with Cuba.
2003: Called U.S. talks with Syria “appropriate.”
2006: Approved of U.S. talking to the Palestinian Authority.
NOW
2008: Said Obama’s willingness to meet with enemy regimes shows his “naiveté and inexperience and lack of judgement.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

THEN
1997: Wrote legislation to ban lobbyists from political campaigns. Said lobbyist fundraisers “clearly represent a conflict of interest.”
NOW
2008: Campaign relies on more than 170 lobbyists to raise money and serve as aides and advisers.

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

THEN
February 2008: Called Obama’s insistence that America can track down and kill Al Qaeda in Pakistan the “confused leadership of an inexperienced candidate.”
NOW
September 2008: Voiced no objections when Bush ordered U.S. special forces to invade Pakistani territory in pursuit of Al Qaeda militants.

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

THEN
Sept. 16th, 2008: “I do not believe that the American taxpayer should be on the hook for AIG.”
NOW
Next day: Backed bailout: “There were literally millions of people whose retirement, whose investments, whose insurance were at risk here.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

McCain is losing because of the economy. Frankly, I can’t believe the main stream media let’s McCain/Palin relaunch old attacks in October as if they were fresh. Talk about desperation.

Posted by: gimme a break | October 6, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

THEN
October 2006: Tells Chris Matthews of Hardball, “I think gay marriage should be allowed.”
NOW
Minutes later: “I do not believe that gay marriages should be legal.”

Posted by: Double Talk Express | October 6, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Jack: McCain voted to protect Domestic Terrorists who carry out violence at Abortion Clinics …
How’s that for comparison?
McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.
McCain opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics.
McCain “voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.”

Posted by: Polderboy | October 6, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Jake, can do you do some sleuthing on McCain and John Singlaub?
Can you also do some sleuthing on McCain and IRI (International Republican Institute)?
There’s a wealth of info there that should be aired before we put this man in the WH.

Posted by: Polderboy | October 6, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

I’ll ask again, since many many many people seem to have gotten the same story this evening:
QUESTION:McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.
====
Is there a reason it should be a federal crime? Is it a federal crime to threaten an orthopedic surgeon?
IMHO, this law was trying to make laws against crimes against abortion clinics different and more serious than laws against any other clinic or non-federal property.

QUESTION:McCain opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics.
===
Is it illegal for anti-war protesters to get within 8 feet of recruiting stations?
Is it illegal for anti-war protesters to get within 8 feet of anybody?
A conservative view is to not make some otherwise equal crimes more heinous because they are against a protected group.
Kind of like not wanting to make it more of a crime to burn a flag than to burn any other kind of cloth.

Posted by: MayBee | October 6, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

MayBee
If they interfere with the rights of public citizens, then yes, it should be illegal.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I got no doubt this would be an issue especially if MNN has anything to do with it. We would never hear the end.

Posted by: Independent in CO | October 6, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

But lest you think that Black is engaging in election year politics, here’s video of him discussing the Keating scandal during a Senate Ethics Committee hearing in 1990. He was just as clear then about his feeling that the meetings in which McCain participated were designed to intimidate regulators against intervening in the Keating case:
Q: What made you feel that the meeting was intimidating?
A: Well, first, the meeting itself, and the players involved. We had the whip, and he was #2 on Senate Banking. We had #3 on Senate — that’s Senator Cranston. We had #3 on Senate Banking, Senator Riegle. We had ‘recap’ pending in front of them, and the Senate by then was our only chance for recapitalization that was anything other than disastrous. We had two bona fide national heroes, in Senator Glenn and Senator McCain… I think Senator Glenn was running for the presidential nomination at that time… We all knew Senator McCain’s war record, and he was considered one of those super rising stars in the Republican who quite possibly would be a candidate for the presidency one day on the Republican standard bearer.

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Raila Odinga

Posted by: NickAtNight | October 6, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

McCain – Phailin ’08 “THE SECOND BEST CANDIDATE LOST ALREADY”

Posted by: Jeff | October 6, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

When the McCain campaign announced this weekend that it would start attacking Sen. Barack Obama via guilt by association, peddling smears about people he barely knows, I thought the tack would lead to the Keating Five. But I didn’t know it would happen this quickly.
Obama’s campaign has never pushed the Keating button before, so this attack carries an original punch-and is clearly salient given the current financial crisis. Because the scandal involved McCain’s actions in public service, it is more likely to arise during the remaining two debates.
McCain’s dredging up of Bill Ayers, in contrast, is not only old news but has no link to anything Obama has done in public life. Patrick Ruffini, a Republican operative who worked on Bush’s reelection campaign, said today that McCain’s Ayers attacks are so old that airing them now “appears desperate.”

Posted by: Andrew | October 6, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

“It may be that he got off on a technicality. He still doesn’t regret setting bombs.”
Perhaps the glove didn’t fit? But then the law did eventually catch up to O.J.
Only, what, 13% of all murderers in New Orleans get convicted. Just because our justice system is broke doesn’t make the man innocent.

Posted by: NickAtNight | October 6, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

I honestly think that if the situation were reversed that the Obama campaign would do the same BUT would not allow the terror remarks nor the “Kill him” that was being screamed at Sarah Palin today. I think anyone who has followed this knows that Barack Obama would shut that type of talk down. Obama said at the time Hillary frist brought up Ayers and Wright that people had a right to ask. I doubt if he feels any differntly now.
It’s not so much that they have brought this issue up, it’s how and what they are allowing.
A staunch McCain supporter, Peggy Noonan, said today ” This race is bigger than this” and I agree with her. People need to understand where each candidate stands on the issues that affect our lives and yet John McCain has chosen to tun on this instead of pointing out where his policies differ from Obama’s. Is it now any wonder that many Republicans, myself included, are voting Obama? No one really knows what McCain or Palin truly think about the issues other than their canned sound bites…and with John voting 90% of the time with Bush? All I, or anyone, can expect is more of the same.

Posted by: Debbie | October 7, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Explain your associations Obama. He wouldn’t be able to pass a background check to work for the FBI, so why should he be allowed to run for President.

Posted by: Mack | October 7, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Hey DNC Party Craher haven’t you heard?

Posted by: Peter Griffin | October 7, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

First at a McCain rally someone yelled out terrorist when McCain asked “Who is the real Barack Obama” and than at a Palin rally, someone emphasized Obama’s middle name Hussein. This just shows you that McCain supporters are RACISTS.

Posted by: Kathy | October 7, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I think this is a major way that Hillary’s campaign helped Obama in the general election. Ayers came out months ago due to the tough primary season. I read about Obama’s “association” with Ayers, weighed it and moved on. It’s old news now. It’s not relevant to deciding who would be a better president, has a better grasp of the issues facing America and would be best able to solve the urgent problems.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 7, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

“First at a McCain rally someone yelled out terrorist when McCain asked “Who is the real Barack Obama” and than at a Palin rally, someone emphasized Obama’s middle name Hussein. This just shows you that McCain supporters are RACISTS. ”
They were Obama plants, so that he can keep his race card in play. As all else begins to fail, he will be clinging to that race card like it was a gun or a bible. Oh the irony.

Posted by: Mack | October 7, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

A different alternate analogy, Jake — I still think the Kent State shooter scenario is apt, but here’s a second scenario more analogous than the abortion clinic bomber:
What if McCain had launched his political career in the living room of a Vietnam veteran who is a William Calley-like figure, who ordered the troops under his command to torture and massacre an entire village of several hundred people, as at My Lai, who is now a respected lecturer at a conservative think tank, who is unrepentant in his previous actions, but was never charged with a crime, and who now promotes U.S. hegemony through lectures, rather than on the ground in a theater of war…
And what if he’d given McCain a $200 campaign contribution eight years ago, and they’d served on a board together, and were “friendly” though they hadn’t spoken in a while, and McCain had condemned his previous actions and didn’t know him back then…
And what if right now McCain were ahead with a Republican wind blowing, and Obama were behind.
And what if Obama started attacking McCain about this guy, saying that McCain is “palling around with war criminals.”
How would it look to you? How would the media react? How would YOU react, Jake? And would it be a fair hit?

Posted by: Jill Nikolaides | October 7, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I have to agree better then and debunk it than now (Thanks, Hillary??)
“I think this is a major way that Hillary’s campaign helped Obama in the general election. Ayers came out months ago due to the tough primary season. I read about Obama’s “association” with Ayers, weighed it and moved on. It’s old news now. It’s not relevant to deciding who would be a better president, has a better grasp of the issues facing America and would be best able to solve the urgent problems. “

Posted by: Jeff | October 7, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

“I read about Obama’s “association” with Ayers, weighed it and moved on. ”
You must get all of your news from the MSM and are too lazy to do any type of critical thinking. You would probably won’t for Osama Bin Laden just because he isn’t a Republican.

Posted by: Mack | October 7, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

“You would probably won’t for”
Meant would.

Posted by: Mack | October 7, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

If Obama were associated and “palling around ” with a terrorist, do you think first, he would be in the Senate, walking the streets free, running for president?
And don’t say that he has connection and that is why he is free, to say that means that your party as well is even more corrupt.
Please McCain, how dumb do you think the American public really are that after 9/11 that any one in government would allow a terrorist to walk free?
I consider you and the republican party domestic terrorists to have allowed Wall Street to rape and steal from me, my American dream.
And those who took the CEO umbrellas need to be behind bars for terrorism.
When this election is over and you must go back to the Senate and Palin crawls back to Alaska, I hope you sleep well at night in one of your 7 homes, while others search for that next cardboard box they will be using for their home.
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Bev | October 7, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Mack …at that same rally with Palin, when she said terrorist, someone in the crowd yelled “kill ‘em”.
Does that not constitute a dangerous position?
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Bev | October 7, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Elderly peoples retirement accounts are being wiped out while McSame has 9 houses and 13 cars. That’s why he doesn’t get it. He wants to talk about Professor Ayers and the 1960′s and make up lies about Obama. Does he think Obama is going to bomb a federal building and move to Afganistan. Where would Michelle shop for clothes and have her nails done.I don’t thionk his girls would like it there.

Posted by: Paula Lacey | October 7, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The question “how is this revelant?”
The relationship is revelant because nothing is public about this candidate.
Barry is the only major candidate who has been able to ride out his campaign as the guy who came from almost nowhere, thus unencumbered by the need to defend any old policies or past decisions.
For a candidate who wants to be elected PTOS, there is nothing wrong with questioning his associations.
A most secretive candidate with dubious associates.
Since I know little about what Barry has done during his tenure in the Illinois senate:
“The Obama campaign says that Sen. Obama has no state senate records to release”
“Illinois State Senate schedule — ‘not available’ ”
Nothing is mentioned Barry’s educational background :
Occidental College records — Not released
Columbia College records — Not released
Columbia Thesis paper — ‘not available’
Harvard College records — Not released
Harvard Law Review articles published — None
University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
I do know that Barry was a lawyer for ACORN, but nothing about his other clients.
Obama has not released his Rezko law records
Law practice client list — Not released
I have never seen an interview with any former friends, classmates, other attorneys or anyone
who can offer information about the “character” of Barry.
Where is the horde of reporters and lawyers descending on Chicago to investigate Obama’s decisions and dealings?
The ties between Barack Obama and terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn go back over 21 years.
The long and short of it? Barack Obama knew, and knew well, that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn were terrorists when he met them. He just didn’t care.
Senator Obama served as a paid director to a “progressive” Chicago-area non-profit organization, the Woods Fund, from 1999 until almost 2003. William C. Ayers served with Senator Obama on the organization’s board of directors.
2001 the Woods Fund gave a $40,000 financial aid grant to a group with ties to the PLO
2002, the Woods Fund gave the Arab American Action Network a second gift of $35,000.
Senator Obama chaired the CAC from 1995 through 1999 Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) — what essentially became Mr. Ayers’ failed Leftist attempt to redesign education in Chicago schools
Woods Fund, it also made a $1,000,000 contribution to Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC)
Barack Obama, at Bill Ayers’ behest, began work in 1995 at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
From March Of 1995 Until September Of 1997, Obama And Ayers Attended At Least Seven Meetings Together Relating To The Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
NOTE: Bill Ayers Was Asked To Help Obama Formulate The Chicago Annenberg Challenge By-Laws.
In 1997, Obama Praised Ayers’ Book On The Juvenile Justice System. “The two men were involved in efforts to reform the city’s education system. They appeared together on academic panels, including one organized by Michelle Obama to discuss the juvenile justice system, an area of mutual concern. Mr. Ayers’s book on the subject won a rave review in The Chicago Tribune by Mr. Obama, who called it ‘a searing and timely account.’” (Jo Becker and Christopher Drew, “Pragmatic Politics, Forged On The South Side,” The New York Times, 5/11/08)
“[Obama And Ayers] Have Also Appeared Jointly On Two Academic Panels, One In 1997 And Another In 2001.” (Russell Berman, “Obama’s Ties To Left Come Under Scrutiny,” The New York Sun, 2/19/08)
From 1999 To 2002, Obama Served With Ayers On The Board Of Directors For Woods Fund Of Chicago. “[Ayers] served with [Obama] from 1999 to 2002 on the board of the Woods Fund
During The Time Obama And Ayers Served Together On The Woods Fund, Ayers Was Quoted Saying “I Don’t Regret Setting Bombs … I Feel We Didn’t Do Enough.”
NOTE: Obama, Born August 14th, 1961, Was 40 Years Old When Ayers Was Quoted
While Obama And Ayers Were Serving On The Woods Fund Together, Ayers Posed Standing On An American Flag For An Article In Chicago Magazine Entitled “No Regrets.”
The Weather Underground Produced A Manual Which Begins, “We Are A Guerrilla Organization. We Are Communist Women And Men, Underground In The United States For More Than Four Years.”

Posted by: CrystalD | October 7, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

“We Are Communist Women And Men, Underground In The United States For More Than Four Years.”
You’d better believe that Barry flirted with Communism in his youth. The real question is what is his real agenda?

Posted by: Mack | October 7, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

CrystalD you may want to add to your list the fact that obama refuses to turn over his donation records many of which are very questionable to the FEC as requested. mccain agreed to turn his over.
you may also add the unresolved judge berg verus obama issue regarding obamas citizenship new updates today regarding the ruling by the judge.
who is this guy?

Posted by: venus | October 7, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Well, Actually, John McCain has defended and supported those who would use violence against abortion clinics:
– Voting against making anti-choice violence a federal crime. As the Jed Report notes, McCain voted in 1993 and 1994 against making “bombings, arson and blockades at abortion clinics, and shootings and threats of violence against doctors and nurses who perform abortions” federal crimes.
– Opposing Colorado’s “Bubble Law.” McCain said he opposed Colorado’s “Bubble Law,” which prohibited abortion protesters from getting within 8 feet of women entering clinics [Denver Post, 2/27/00]. The law was later upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
– Voting to allow those fined for violence at clinics to avoid penalties by declaring bankruptcy. NARAL Pro-Chioce America notes that McCain “voted to allow perpetrators of violence or harassment at reproductive-health clinics to avoid paying the fines assessed against them for their illegal acts by declaring bankruptcy.”
Apparently Sen McCain has his own domestic terrorist issues. And let’s not forget Sarah Palin is MARRIED to a former (6 years) Alaska Independence Party member. Whole lot more smoke around McCain Palin than around Sen. Obama.

Posted by: WinstonSmith1984 | October 7, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

I read somewhere in the good book, I think it’s in one of those famous ten commandments. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
I would think that those of you who know better ought to uphold this value. Unless you are absolutely sure, you ought to let your conscience guide your actions.

Posted by: IMHO | October 7, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

The MSM has not explored the relationship between David Ifshin and John McCain.
Think Jane Fonda. Call him ‘Hanoi David.’ And yes, they knew each other. And Bill Clinton. And John McCain.
It seems Ifshin is the voice McCain heard daily in his POW cell in Hanoi.
It seems years later, they met and became friends.
McCain actually accepted that Ifshin had changed, and even spoke at Ifshin’s funeral.
Ifshin was a former owner of The New Republic, and a former lawyer to Bill Clinton.
The same Bill Clinton who pardoned William Ayers.

Posted by: kravitz | October 7, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

And, what if he took money from an American terrorist/bomber to give to groups to radicalize kids?

Posted by: aware2u | October 7, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Joe Klein: “What A Desperate Empty Embarrassment The McCain Campaign Has Become”

Posted by: Andrew | October 7, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

CrystalD: Well said.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 7, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

The premise of your comparison is faulty. The idea that Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhood has been debunked. Ayers handpicked him to chair the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which they worked on together for six years funneling money to questionable organizations. Obama’s political career was launched in Ayers’ living room. And they served on more than one board together. Their working relationship can be traced for the past 21 years. Even CNN ran a piece tonight charting their relationship, and much to Anderson Cooper’s dismay, they found that Obama’s claim to “barely know him” is a lie.

Posted by: jana | October 7, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Can we mention G. Gordon Liddy?
And for what it’s worth, McCain includes former IRA sympathizer Peter King among his supporters (King having switched from Giuliani, and rebranded himself as a ‘terrorism expert’ in reverse order) and would presumably glad-hand the current crop of NI pols on March 17 next year.

Posted by: luther blissett | October 7, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Well, well. Pleased to see how many people posting here are aware that Steve Chapman pointed out (in May and again in August) the connection between John McCain and Gordon Liddy.
Of course we know how the media reacted to that (and the rest of McCain’s questionable associations). Dead silence.

Posted by: Tom J | October 7, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Communist
Declared war on the united States
Confessed to setting off bombs, said he did not do enough and wished he could of done more.
Best Friend, close personal friend for 20 years.
Worked, played, dined, and vacationed with these friends.
Their father was the like godfather of the inner circle of Chicago, handed it down to his two sons. The weathly and powerful.
I think it needs looked into
Knowing someone is a communist, knowing they were a terrorist, knowing they still felt the same now as when they set the bombs, and choose to keep the friendship is wrong on so many levels.
Any other person would not of made it this far in the race.
Especially knowing his other friends were Anti Americans and muslim supporters.

Posted by: seah | October 7, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

This old friend stuff is pretty weak. Let’s look at the present: McCain’s staff IS FULL OF LOBBYISTS ! For oil so they can screw us, for drugs so they keep out cheaper ones from Canada, etc.; he takes lobby money but Sen. Obama ONLY funds his campaign with personal donations. —– Those average a few hundred dollars, McCain gets many fewer but mostly from rich Republicans. — And McCains’s staff has “smart” people like the ex-HP CEO who drove the stock down and now they are laying off 25,000 people! Or Phil Gramm, who as a lobbyist for a foreign company, helped to start the housing crisis! —– Now those are some CURRENT connections to be worried about!

Posted by: Richard | October 7, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Like so many things in Washington the problem isn’t that he knows him, it is the lies about his relationship that Obama needs to address. Ayers like him or not does not make a secret of where he stands. He wears his past as a badge of honor. For Obama to deny and then minimalize their relationship is the real problem. It is this reason the American people believe that Obama has something to hide. If he has nothing to hide, then why the need to lie?

Posted by: ubu1991 | October 7, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

McNamarra and LBJ, in their later years, admitted that the Vietnam War should never have been fought. Thousands of Americans protested the war. Were these folks terriests?
Ayers was in a protest group but no one has ever proved he did anything illegal.
In his subsequent life, he became a professor in a major university and worked in many civic groups to better his community. This has been documented.
QUESTION: What problem does the McCain/Palin group have with Obama knowing someone like Ayers? At the time of Ayer’s membership in the protest group, Obama was eight years old.

Posted by: Beto | October 7, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Abortion Clinic bomber—??…I doubt that a hero might emerge from whence…my thoughts about Abortion are hinged to FRAUD…and I might think that early clinics had NOT met the fraudulent characters that ecist today…but might associate bombings like pushing away the OUTSIDERS of crime..really meaning FRAUD…I doubt that Ayers has a mind about justice…and is more akin to crime and fraud.(period)

Posted by: Mark S. M. | October 7, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

- Chicago Mayor Daley has said that Senator Obama and Bill Ayers were “friends.”
- The Annenberg Challenge records show Ayers and Obama met dozens of times.
- Obama NEVER talks about and did not write in his two book about his four years as CEO of the $110Million Annenberg Challenge, in spite of the fact that he desperately needs some executive experience on his resume. This four years glaring gap in his professional resume should be a red flag to anyone who’s ever been responsible for hiring people. Avoided resume gaps are bad news. And this was a mere 10 years ago. Couple this with a refusal to release his Occidental, Columbia and Harvard Law transcripts and Illinois Bar application and you have yourself a stealth candidate applying for the highest office in the land.
- David Axelrod said that Obama and Ayers’ kids went to the same school and that was about it. Ayer’s kids happen to be 20 years older than Obama’s. So why would Axelrod say this?
- In a Democratic Primary debate Obama described Ayers as “an acquaintance”.
If the Ayers/Obama relationship is all so darn harmless, what’s everyone hiding, and why?

Posted by: JimF | October 7, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Here are some real hypothetical questions:
What if the news media was not part of the 0bama campaign and didn’t run mostly laudatory articles and editorials about 0bama? What if they weren’t doing a 24/7 hit job on Governor Palin and Senator McCain? (ABC: McCain ‘Nasty & Bitter’; CBS: He’s Going Negative to Depress Turnout) What if our U.S. ”Free Press” was actually honest in it’s reporting, had not been taken over by Communists, Socialists, and Marxists, and was not biased? What if Olbermann had to tell the truth for one brief instant?
I think the answer to these questions would be that our universe would blink out of existence from the extremely high ratio of improbability coinciding with reality. In short – fat chance.

Posted by: The Doktor | October 7, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

Is the media capable of any independent thought or is it simply led by the nose by one campaign at a time?
Always the nastiest because they are losing.
First it was the Clinton’s, now McCain’s.
JT, you know this question and this article are cheap shot to increase your blog figures.
Compared to McCain and Palin, Obama is an innocent in Washington.
Both McCain and his wife have escaped punishment for their felonious misdeeds due to insider clout.
She should have been sent to jail like her father (twice a Mafia felon) and his Senate colleagues shielded him in the Keating 5 savings and loan bailout.
Yet you crucify a man who has done nothing wrong except be acquainted in passing with a man who has never been convicted of a crime.
Liddy and Oliver have committed treason and escaped like Reagan and the two slimy Bushes and Cheney.
The latter should be tried for genocide.
You have a warped value system.
Be sure to do everything you can to boost your readership over an innocent man’s body.

Posted by: susan | October 7, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Not a news article from a supposed news bureau. If all the so-called news media reported the news, as such, without their hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil of Obama biases, then we wouldn’t have such questions because Obama wouldn’t even be a US Senator, let alone a candidate for the presidency.

Posted by: Jim | October 7, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

Jake,
Great questions! Too bad few folks actually answered them. If McCain had an association with a guy who admitted bombing abortion clinics, against whom charges were dropped due to a technicality, etc. etc., the media would be feasting. John McCain wouldn’t be able to get within 100 yards of a microphone or TV camera without being asked about it by a reporter. The Obama campaign, the liberal establishment, all the liberal, pro-Obama, mainline newsmedia would be repeating and exaggerating the story and not hiding their glee as they do it.

Posted by: Chris | October 7, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am

Wouldn’t it be interesting to see a Republican presidential candidate some day who was friends with and worked with David Duke?
Surely the media would ignore that story.
/sarcasm

Posted by: Peach | October 7, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

I believe that John McCain was touting his relationship with, and his endorsement by, Oliver North, just this past February.   There’s another guy who was charged but not convicted.  Beat the rap and went on with his life.  And is fairly “unrepentant” about his illegal activities.
 

Posted by:    Lee C.   ―   U.S.A.    | October 7, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am

I have no idea if any clinic bombers or doctor/nurse murderers hosted fund raisers for McCain.
I do know that in ’92 and ’93, McCain voted against making abortion clinic bombings and arson and the murders of doctors and nurses providing abortions into federal crimes. He also supported a bill that would allow those guilty of clinic-related crimes to avoid paying fines by declaring bankruptcy.
“Domestic terrorism” seems to be kind of a relative thing to the McCains of the world. As long as you support the ends, any means seem to be just fine.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 7, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

I have no doubt that the Obama propagandists (aka mainstream media) would crucify McCain over it…reminiscent of the Hillary “I dodged gun fire” gaffe v. Joe Biden’s “I was shot at” gaffe. Hillary was crucified by the media over it…Biden…crickets.
Is any of this fair…no…but that’s politics…everyone should just get over it…

Posted by: Lulu | October 7, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

Once again, the mainstream media, now Jake Tapper, tries to downplay the significance of the fact Obama was more than just “friendly” with Ayers.
Jake, look into the Annenberg records. Why did Obama first say Ayers is just some guy in the neighborhood, and now he’s back tracking? If there is nothing here, why isn’t he discussing it openly but critical of those who ask it.
THINK: OBAMA KICKED OFF HIS POLITICAL CAREER IN THE LIVING ROOM OF AN UNREPENTANT DOMESTIC TERRORIST WHO AFTER 9/11 REAFFIRMED THAT HE IS UNREPENTANT FOR HIS ACTIONS.

Posted by: JA | October 7, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

This just in! McCain supported the Iran-Contra affair. Yes John McCain supported a group of ex-Nazi collaborators who supplied arms to IRAN in return for monies used to buy weapons for the Contras in South America. I guess since we are talking about associations this is relevant. Obviously McCain has no problem supporting right-wing radicals that actually kill innocents. He only has a problem with anybody who might be remotely associated with left wing radicals who harmed noone.

Posted by: Bobba | October 7, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

McCain is white..so an Ayer’s association with McCain would not have been an issue, at least with mainstream media, just as McCain’s association with Libby was not an issue, nor Keating 5 an issue with mainstream media……
until progressive bloggers started leading the charge against McCain which mainstream media eventually and unwillingly picks up in order to compete.
So these will not be issues because McCain benefits greatly from his white privilege.

Posted by: tim | October 7, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

McCain is white..so an Ayer’s association with McCain would not have been an issue, at least with mainstream media, just as McCain’s association with Libby was not an issue, nor Keating 5 an issue with mainstream media……
until progressive bloggers started leading the charge against McCain which mainstream media eventually and unwillingly picks up in order to compete.
So these will not be issues because McCain benefits greatly from his white privilege.

Posted by: tim | October 7, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Jake,
We all know the media would be all over it…

Posted by: TexasLouie | October 7, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

mccain is so desperate he would kick his mother to the curb—-he will never cease to be a vile old man–with very little to offer—-all his past should be held against him–including when he broadcast propaganda against the usa when he was a prisioner in nam—-if not for his father who was admiral in charge of the pacific fleet at the time–he most likely would have been hung for treason—mccain lives in a very large glass house and should not throw lieing or exagerated stones.

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

If Ayers past is so important, then why don’t someone fire him from the University?

Posted by: Jack | October 7, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Here’s another hypothetical:
What if John McCain had been a member of a church for twenty years that, on a fairly regular basis, condemned America for still clinging to affirmative action, calling the USA “The United States of NAACP” in derisive form? And we have the videos…
Game over if that had been the case. You know it. I know it. Everyone here knows it.

Posted by: Jim | October 7, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

WHY WASNT MCCAINPERSONALY TRIED FOR TREASON—-HE HAD NO PROBLEM SPREADING PROPAGANDA AGAINST THE TROOPS AND THE USA,WHEN IN NAM

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

The level of ignorance on the subject of Ayers by writers on this blog is staggering. He has ADMITTED to the bombings. Charges were dropped against him (Ayers) because wire tapping evidence was thrown out. People…open your eyes. The man (Ayers) said he is sorry he didn’t do more in terms of bombing. And the scary thing is that the Ayers friendship is just one of MANY questionable friendships that Obama has maintained!!

Posted by: Dan Petre | October 7, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Well, lets add to your story line Jake. What if McCain had gone to the same University as the abortion Clinic Bomber at the same time and there were no records of the years attending the school and no records of the years in Government at the state level. Thats exactly what we have with Obama. He spent years at Columbia University at the same time as Ayers. The two did not know each other? Also, Obama’s legislative record from his years in Illinois have somehow just disappeared. This is a man who touts his experience yet we know nothing about the years of experience he claims make him ready for the White House. Again, where has the media been. Where are the investigations?

Posted by: glennmcgahee | October 7, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

By using the “what if McCain” did — seems to be your way of defending Obama’s association with Ayers.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | October 7, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

obama is guilty of something another has done—-WHY IS MCCAIN NOT GUILTY FOR HIS PERSONAL TREASONES BEHAVIOR—SEEMS FUNNY HOW THE I WAS A POW HAS VANISHED

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

SINCE OBAMA – FOR TWO YEARS – HAS NOT LOWERED HIMSELF TO PLAY THE “GUILT BY ASSOCIATION” SMEAR GAME – I WOULD HAVE TO SAY, THAT BASED ON HIS REPUTATION AS SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT SINK INTO GUTTER POLITICS, HE WOULD NOT USE THIS AGAINST MCCAIN.
NOW – HERE IS A CHALLENGE:
HOW ABOUT THIS HYPOTHETICAL? IF OBAMA’S DAUGHTER WAS FORNICATING AT SIXTEEN YEARS OLD AND WAS PREGNANT AT 17, AND IF HIS WIFE BELONGED TO A RADICAL GROUP IN A PARTICULAR STATE AND HELD MEMBERSHIP FOR A MINIMUM OF SEVEN YEARS AND THIS GROUP WANTED TO BE A COUNTRY OF IT’S OWN AND IN TREASONOUS TERMS RANTED ABOUT ITS HATRED OF AMERICA OVER AND OVER AND USED VIOLENT LANGUAGE – DO YOU THINK ALL OF THIS WOULD BE SPLASHED ON EVERY NEWS CHANNEL AND MAGAZINE IN THE COUNTRY??????? WHAT WOULD BE THE REASON IF IT WASN’T? DO YOU THINK THE “BABY MAMA” SMEARS WOULD BE ALL OVER THE INTERNET? DO YOU THINK THE SCARY, BLACK, RADICAL, TREASONOUS WIFE HEADLINES WOULD BE ALL OVER AS WELL?
IS THE MEDIA COMPLICIT IN THIS DOUBLE STANDARD BY ITS SILENCE?

Posted by: jt1 | October 7, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Hey, if someone had Obama tortured for years until he had an association with Ayers then I think we could give him a pass.
What Obama did was IN character.
McCain’s statements (as the result of being broken by repeated torture) were OUT of character. So much that he tried to kill himself in his cell after he did it.
OTOH, Obama has made every step of the way about him. It’s all about Barack. His narcissism makes Bill Clinton look like Mother Teresa.

Posted by: Jim | October 7, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

JT1
JUST THINK WHAT WOULD BE SAID IF OBAMA WAS ON THE RADIO DENOUNCING THE TROOPS AND CONDEMING THE USA—-MCCAIN SHOULD HAVE BEEN HUNG FOR TREASON—BUT HIS DADDY SAVED HIM.

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

8:07:10
First, welcoming a group to a particular geographical location (what Palin did in the ‘damning’ video) is not paramount to belonging to that group. This has been debunked completely. She never was a member of that party. Simply not true.
Secondly, having a teenage daughter who is pregnant hardly reveals a deep character flaw or a political predisposition in the parent.
But thanks for playing. You make a real nice straw man that almost combusts spontaneously.

Posted by: Jim | October 7, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

THE ONLY REASON HE WANTED TO KILL HIMSELF WAS BECAUSE HE WAS IN VERY DIRECT CONFLICT WITH HIS FATHER–ALSO SHOWS HE IS A LITTLE UNSTABLE–WHICH HE STILL SHOWS TODAY

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

I think all political and monetary associations linked to our elected officials should be made public. An informed and educated electorate is what makes this country great.
I think it’s very relevant that Senator Obama has had RADICAL Muslims raising money for him since 1988. questions have been raised about Obama’s student loans and Obama’s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obama’s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991. The allegations first surfaced in late March when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was “raising money” for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School. In the interview Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a “mentor” to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Posted by: Judy in Oklahoma | October 7, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

What a cesspool these boards are becoming. Thanks, Jim, for remaining calm and rational. The loonies come in, ranting about how McCain was either not really tortured or a collaborator with the Vietnamese or some other nonsense and you have to wonder about all those vaunted claims that it is the well-educated who are drawn to Obama. But then, I never bought that line, since I am an academic with a PhD who is strongly for McCain. As Jim says, we know McCain’s character and his presidency will reflect that character– he will put his country first, work in a bipartisan way, and fight for reform. We have to wonder about Obama’s character and judgment and what we see of that judgment concerns me in considering how he would govern. I am not taking that chance.

Posted by: Moderate | October 7, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

MCCAIN LIVES IN A GLASS HOUSE —OR IS IT 7 GLASSHOUSES——-IF HE WANTS TO THROW STONES THEN HE WILL GET THE TRUTH THROWN BACK AT HIM –HIS DISTRACTION WONT WORK –SOME OF US ARE A LITTLE SMARTER THAN HE IS.

Posted by: rodney | October 7, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Great question! Of course, McCain would be nowhere near to stepping into the White House; the mainstream media would have seen to that! Why has Obama gotten a free pass?

Posted by: marylou | October 7, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I watched an international report on the state of the world economy last night.
Reports were of country after country and how each one’s economy is crashing because of the US economic mismanagement – it is worldwide. Americans sure hasn’t make any friends around the world the way the US ran things economically.
The discussion was also about how the US has had it’s day, the world power is over. The allies were shown, some in their own, parliaments, Germany for example, actually announcing the end of the American dominance and you know what the allies of America did – they CHEERED. That’s right. Of course this would never be found on an American station.
America has destroyed it’s reputation in the world because of, mainly the wars, and arm twisting in other areas. What some citizens and the current government don’t seem to get, is that Americans generally don’t look from a perspective of the outside in – they naval gaze. According to all the experts, America’s leaderhip in the world in ways that matter, is over. The goodwill is gone.
China, India and Russia will be dominating from now.
For TWO years, America was warned that it cannot afford 10 billion dollars a month to run ONE war. America was warned about the unregulated banks. We’ve heard which candidates have been warning of this for TWO YEARS.
And yet, what does the world see? America potentially electing a candidate like sarah palin who absolutely in no way can deal with the endless list of grave issues America and the world faces. We see her ranting and raging like a nut in a third world country about hateful things and we wonder – what the heck is wrong with the US? Why are they even entertaining the notion that this is a serious candidate? It is embarrassing.
And then we see John McCain, in ailing health, so out of touch with the realities of the world and the citizens – in one area alone, Iraq, if any candidate doesn’t want to get the heck out of Iraq, that should be one big red flag.
The Republicans candidate voted over and over and OVER to deregulate, he’s quite happy to stay at war and GO to war, his policies really don’t give the working poor and the middle class a bit of a foundation to get through what will be in a few months, a bad recession and possibly down the road, a world-wide depression.
How can any candidate possibly think 10 billion dollars a month is something a near bankrupt America can afford?
Unforutnately, America has had it so good for so long that there seems to be a denial about how grave the situation is.
If people truly recognized the danger the country is in, as everyone else in the world does, then there is no way, NO WAY, they would stand for a cartoonish hee haw character spewing about a bunch of nonsense – that person would not be taken seriously and booted from the stage.
It really is sad to see this happen to the US but America chose this path, you the voter, you chose bush, cheney and that party. We are all waiting to see if you now reward the whole pack with the big prize or finally punish them.
Bankrupting the country with the wars etc.:
The Republican war monger current administration and the mccain/palin ticket (“goin’ after those terrorists”) played EXACTLY into Bin Laden’s hands and Iran, China, Chavez hopes and plans.
They’ve been meeting over the years and plotting and making speeches openly – the goal is this slaying of the American empire through bankruptcy, jobs shifted elsewhere and China buying up all the gold for a while now – and the American government that voters elected got sucked right in.
There seems to be defensiveness and a “I don’t care what the world thinks” by some citizens but the fact remains, this is a global society and it does matter. The consequences are before you now.
This analysis report of the American situation within the world was quite grave and the bottom line was that America had better start to realize her cowboy politics has dreadfully backfired (deny or not) and the economy, the American strength, is over. The good will is gone. There are things that matter beyond the US borders believe it or not.

Posted by: denial | October 7, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

John McCain launch his campaign in a room with a friend of Cindy McCain whom he was cheating on his wife with at the time. McCain’s hands are not clean. Neither is Palin with her voodoo witch doctor blessing, Alaska statehoood support, and troopergate scandal. McCain\Palin I am sure will say at least they didn’t target America. Maybe not, but I would surely question McCain’s and Palin’s character and judgement in their involvement in them.

Posted by: indy_voter | October 7, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

The coverage of this campaign reminds me of the same poor coverage of the run-up to the Iraq War. The media was so afraid of being called unpatriotic that they never investigated anything the Bush administration said. Now they are so afraid of being labeled racist they are handling Obama with kid gloves. Certainly, we have heard about Obama/Rezko, but what other candidate would get away with saying it was a “bone headed mistake” and that was the end of it? Bill Clinton would have been hammered. Speaking of Bill Clinton, I am still waiting for the media to explain to me why using the term fairytale is racist. Nobody ever asked anyone to explain. If anyone else had said typical white person it would have been in the headlines for weeks, but all I get is Chris Mathew’s tingling legs. The media keeps telling me how intelligent obama is but he has no academic writings to prove this statement so what is it based upon? Why has no one asked Oprah why she eviscerated James Frey because he lied in his book, but nothing about the lies in Obama’s autobiography. Once again the news people aren’t doing their job and the American people might pay for it.

Posted by: Rain | October 7, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

McCain’s statements (as the result of being broken by repeated torture) were OUT of character. So much that he tried to kill himself in his cell after he did it.
So, does that mean he is forgiven for every erratic and poor judgement decision he has been in the Senate over the last 27 years? The only reason he has lasted in the Senate for so long is because he was a POW. If that were not the case the Republican party in Arizona would have thrown him out long ago.

Posted by: indy_voter | October 7, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Jake Tapper always gives objective facts and poses subjective positions to force you to analyze, how at times. the majority of the media do not consider.

Posted by: Julie | October 7, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Obama’s connection with Ayers is tenuous, at best.
Let’s have a serious discussion on the economy.

Posted by: Ji | October 7, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

CNN, of all places….CNN has said Obama lied about his friendship with William Ayres. That the relationship goes further, then just mere acquaintances, that served on a few boards together.
The coming out party for Obama, held at the Ayres home, was planned by Ayres and Obama. Not a mutual third party, and 2 people at said party said Obama lied about that.
2 former FBI agents, said that because Ayres is unrepentant for these crimes,would still make him a dangerous person in their opinions.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 7, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

If Obama had a 17 year old daughter who was pregnant, he would probably lose Democrat votes because they would be angry that she didn’t have an abortion.
And can anyone say that the press hasn’t obsessed on the pregnancy of Sarah Palin’s daughter? I see no similar obsession with Obama’s close association with William Ayers and his utter lack of credibility in claiming that he didn’t know about Ayers’ past. What newspapers does he read, again?

Posted by: A. Reider | October 7, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Medical costs have increase so much it’s almost impossible to afford my medical care, even with insurance. My medical bills have wiped out our savings and my wife’s 401K has lost over 30% of it’s value in the last year. And you studpid republicans want to argue about Ayers.
You fools are in insult to humanity.

Posted by: The Unshrub | October 7, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“Obama’s connection with Ayers is tenuous, at best.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 7, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Glen asks:
“Thats exactly what we have with Obama. He spent years at Columbia University at the same time as Ayers. The two did not know each other?”
hey – I lived in the same city as Obama AND Ayers – and didn’t know either – does that make me a liar too?

Posted by: Fred | October 7, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“Obama’s connection with the Ayers family is like that of Pinnochio to Gepetto, for heaven’s sake.”
And yet not a single photograph of the two together exists…
interesting…

Posted by: Fred | October 7, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

“Why has no one asked Oprah why she eviscerated James Frey because he lied in his book, but nothing about the lies in Obama’s autobiography.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 7, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

If all the questions in Jakes blog were factual, then McCain would not be the Nominee. Now that we are learning more about Obama and this terrorist lets get the MSM to ask more probing questions to Obama directly as to why he would have ever dealt with a man like this? Furthermore, If Obama’s lack of judgement in dealing with people is this bad, reporters should ask him what we should expect after his 143 days of first U.S. Senate service is over as well as his campaign for President.

Posted by: bill | October 7, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

If – Jake’s hypothetical was true, I think Obama would be just as out of line attacking McCain as McCain is attacking Obama. We cannot be responsible for the political views or even law-abiding tendencies for everyone we meet, certainly when their record is far in the past and their current views are on matters that have no connection to the association. ———– Now turn it around. What if Obama had something like involvement in the Keating Five and S&L collapse in his background — or adultery and kicking-aside a loyal wife who was no longer pretty. Do you think , for a moment, that McCain and Palin would civilly ignore the private matter and bring up the past public history of unethical behavior affecting the financial fortunes of millions of citizens only after they were unfairly made the target of smears regarding guilt by association? Answer honestly.

Posted by: Elizabeth | October 7, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Let’s review again what that very same Steve Chapman said last May about McCain’s ties with G. Gordon Liddy. First, a bit on Liddy’s background from Wikipedia:
“In 1980, Liddy published an autobiography, titled ‘Will’, which sold more than a million copies and was made into a television movie. In it he states that he once made plans with Hunt to kill journalist Jack Anderson, based on a literal interpretation of a Nixon White House statement ‘we need to get rid of this Anderson guy’…
“Some of his [radio talk-show comments shortly after the Branch Davidian raid] led to condemnation by then President Bill Clinton…
“August 26, 1994 – ‘Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests … They’ve got a big target on there, ATF. Don’t shoot at that, because they’ve got a vest on underneath that. Head shots, head shots…. Kill the sons of bitches.’
“September 15, 1994 – ‘If the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms insists upon a firefight, give them a firefight. Just remember, they’re wearing flak jackets and you’re better off shooting for the head.’ ”
Now, Chapman’s May article (
“What McCain didn’t mention [while attacking Ayers] is that he has his own Bill Ayers — in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.
“How close are McCain and Liddy? At least as close as Obama and Ayers appear to be.In 1998, Liddy’s home was the site of a McCain fundraiser. Over the years, he has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator’s campaigns — including $1,000 this year.
“Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as ‘an old friend,’ and McCain sounded like one. ‘I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family,’ he gushed. ‘It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.’
“…[During Liddy's Branch Davidian advice], he mentioned labeling targets ‘Bill’ and ‘Hillary’ when he [himself] practiced shooting…
“I made repeated inquiries [on the subject of Liddy] to [McCain's] campaign aides, which they refused to acknowledge, much less answer. On this topic, the pilot of the Straight Talk Express would rather stay parked in the garage.”

Posted by: Bruce Moomaw | October 8, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.