By Dschabner

Oct 19, 2008 7:57pm

Biden: Powell Endorsement Means ‘No More Questions’ About Obama’s Readiness

ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports: Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., today traveled to the Pacific Northwest for a rally before 11,500 supporters in Tacoma, Wash., touting former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., as the answer to any questions about Obama’s readiness to be commander in chief. 

"Today we’re proud, and I mean this sincerely, very proud to add another critical voice in American public policy and military affairs for the past 25 years to the endorsement list of those who have joined endorsing our ticket, Colin Powell!” the Democratic vice-presidential nominee said as the crowd erupted. “Thank you, Colin!

“From the very beginning, this Republican party has tried to suggest that Barack Obama, Sen. Barack Obama wasn’t ready to be commander in chief,” continued Biden, who noted that he’s been friends with Powell for 25 years. “Ladies and gentlemen, with all the three and four star generals, with the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the former national security adviser, the former secretary of state, one of the most respected men who have ever worn the uniform endorsing Barack Obama over John McCain today, no more questions! Barack Obama will be a commander in chief we can all respect!”

On the same day Obama received the endorsement of Powell, a Republican and former member of the Bush administration, Biden noted that the Democratic presidential candidate’s proposal on Iraq has earned the support of President Bush, leaving McCain “the odd man out.”

“George Bush, after six painful years, has finally figured out it’s time to transfer responsibility to the Iraqis, draw down American forces,” said the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. “Well, guess what? George Bush is about to sign an agreement with the Iraqi leadership saying we’ll have all combat troops out of the cities in Iraq within seven months, and we’ll have all troops out of Iraq by Dec. 31, 2009. So folks, folks, John McCain talks about leadership. Let me remind you. Whose idea was that? Barack Obama’s. John McCain’s the only odd man out now, along with Gov. Palin.”

But the draft of the Status of Forces Agreement calls for U.S. troops to be out of Iraq by Dec. 31, 2011.

Speaking at Cheney Stadium, home of the Seattle Mariners’ Triple-A farm team Tacoma Rainiers, Biden said that Democrats were “temporarily changing the name from Cheney Stadium to Obama-Biden Stadium for the day.”

“Besides, if it was Cheney Stadium, we’d be at an undisclosed location.” Biden quipped in a dig at the man he hopes to replace as vice-president. “You’d never be able to find us.”

User Comments

OBAMA = LEADER
McCAIN = FAIL

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 19, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

HAHAHAHAHA, LAUGHABLE!

Posted by: demRnuts | October 19, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Obama gets cold reception in NC diner
Woman shouts ‘socialist, get out of here’ at Obama
by Christi Parsons
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C.–The Crown Coliseum had been full of Barack Obama’s cheering fans.
The after-church lunch crowd at Cape Fear BBQ and Chicken was less hospitable to the Democrat.
According to the pool reporter at the lunch stop, the barbecue joint was filled with dozens of older and mostly white diners.
As Obama walked in, a woman at the other end of the restaurant, a woman began shouting at him.
“Socialist, socialist, socialist!” said Diane Fanning, 54, a Sam’s Club employee. “Get out of here.”
There was a lot of noise and excitement and positive reception as well and it was unclear whether Obama heard her, writes pool reporter Margaret Talev, of McClatchy Newspapers.
But there was no disputing the animosity later, when Obama tried to shake Fanning’s hand. She refused the gesture.
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obamas_a_socialist_woman_shout.html
WEL, WELL BARRY! IT LOOKS LIKE MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE IN NC..HAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Posted by: southern hospitality | October 19, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Biden Says Obama Not Ready for Presidency
http://writenow.wordpress.com/2008/08/23/biden-says-obama-not-ready-for-presidency/
’nuff said!

Posted by: romeISburning | October 19, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

What a joke Joe. The credibility of Collin Powell has been lost. Throughout Mr. Powell’s career he espoused Moderate Republican values similar to that of John McCain. I would have voted for Colin Powell had he run for President. To support a man with such inexperience, questionable integrity and above all the most liberal member of congress is eye opening and appalling. It proves that many educated blacks are making race the sole issue in the election. Mr. Powell’s primary reason was McCain’s VP choice and his ability to non supreme count justices. The VP candidate has more executive experience than Mr. Hussein. The court nom would be moderates as that is what McCain is and Mr. Powell has previouslt puported to be. Hussein’s nom would be radical left wing liberals. Mr. Powell’s stance and detest on gays in the military will have to be explained by Obama but he will be able to back track on this issue as on so many others. The Canadians can attest to Obama’s rhetoric regarding NAFTA and his closed door meeting to assure them he would not raise the issue after the election. The gullible American electorate as they are referred to will not bring the issue up as economic issue remains forefront of the election and trying to tie McCain’s policies to Bush. The fact that Bush has turned out to be a liberal democrat when it comes to spending and Obama wants to continue these policies has been deflected. The cause of the economic meltdown was created largely from liberal congress members voting records and

Posted by: jamesferrel | October 19, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

FNMA policies that Obama indirectly supported through work as an attorney representing ACORN. Applications for new bank branches were held up in court unless they were built in downtrodden neighborhoods. His voting record during his two years in congress also support actions that harmed prudent lending standards. Sportsman and gun owners also beware. Look at Obama and Biden wwwGunBanObama.com

Posted by: jamesferrel | October 19, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

southern hospitality?; sounds more like unspeakable rudeness, both from the woman in the diner for shouting at sen. obama and refusing to shake a hand, and from you, for thinking that it was funny and that it showed obama getting what i suspect you think was his ‘comeuppance’. shame on both of you…

Posted by: antijake | October 19, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

8 more years! 8 years was not enough! We want MORE! Vote Republican. 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

What qualifies Joe Biden to make that statement? Being an alcoholic, and an ignorant gaffe machine. The only reason Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama is because of race and color, not because Obama is qualified and experienced.

Posted by: Diana in California | October 19, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

‘Obama gets cold reception in NC diner’
At least he is man enough to go into republican strongholds and ask for votes.
McCain & Palin will never go anywhere uncomfortable or unscripted

Posted by: watching | October 19, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

No. Not by a longshot Joe the Senator.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? Many say that what you won’t make the same mistakes that others have because of your sound judgement (ie, your choice of pastor). The only thing, Senator, is that there still remain many mistakes yet to be written into this planet’s history books. You won’t always have the benefit of others experience, you’ll have to leverage your own experience and you have too little on which to base your judgement. I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell, Mr. Matthews … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the morale, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them (I have a friend that is an Army Reservist. He is deploying, again, to Iraq. He has a wife, a son and a daughter. He does not serve so that he can kill children and raid villages Senator). What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Did you at least play with the little green plastic troops when you lived in Hawaii? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung mentally Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning and learning from one’s mistakes. The surge worked Senator.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have access to affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the still unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that President Obama’s, Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax rate applied against his $0.00 income.
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, high cost American jobs would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those finding themselves newly unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message your handlers have planted in you, that message you think the voters want to hear. I was laughing a bit, but if I understand you correctly, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created, were actually created or do actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that timeframe passes? Let me point this out to my fellow voters. Senator Obama wants to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time he wants to turnaround and give them a tax credit for jobs they create? Senator, or maybe I should be addressing your advisers, you do realize that the two are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job decrease/increase. If you can convince us that those are winning policies Senator Obama, then I’d suggest you save us all some trouble, sell the American voters a bridge to nowhere and retire, pen some books, give some speeches. Indeed, your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama, not by a long shot.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Suicide rate? Pick a rate Senator.

Posted by: 0bama ; 0experience ; 8 more years of Bush | October 19, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

It is pathetic to see the user comments on Fox News about Powell’s endorsement of Obama. They keep character attacks to Obama or call Powell’s support based on race. What nobody there can do is object in any way the absolute concise truth about the reasons for his decision. The summarized the American sentiment about McCain’s erratic and negative campaign, about the resurgence of polarization in the GOP. Obama’s vision of ONE America are still the same we heard in his keynote speech at the Democratic Convention in 2004. Find it in You tube.

Posted by: Charles | October 19, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

No. Not by a longshot.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? Many say that what you won’t make the same mistakes that others have because of your sound judgement (ie, your choice of pastor). The only thing, Senator, is that there still remain many mistakes yet to be written into this planet’s history books. You won’t always have the benefit of others experience, you’ll have to leverage your own experience and you have too little on which to base your judgement. I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell, Mr. Matthews … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the morale, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them (I have a friend that is an Army Reservist. He is deploying, again, to Iraq. He has a wife, a son and a daughter. He does not serve so that he can kill children and raid villages Senator). What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Did you at least play with the little green plastic troops when you lived in Hawaii? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung mentally Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning and learning from one’s mistakes. The surge worked Senator.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have access to affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the still unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that President Obama’s, Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax rate applied against his $0.00 income.
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, high cost American jobs would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those finding themselves newly unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message your handlers have planted in you, that message you think the voters want to hear. I was laughing a bit, but if I understand you correctly, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created, were actually created or do actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that timeframe passes? Let me point this out to my fellow voters. Senator Obama wants to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time he wants to turnaround and give them a tax credit for jobs they create? Senator, or maybe I should be addressing your advisers, you do realize that the two are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job decrease/increase. If you can convince us that those are winning policies Senator Obama, then I’d suggest you save us all some trouble, sell the American voters a bridge to nowhere and retire, pen some books, give some speeches. Indeed, your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama, not by a long shot.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Suicide rate? Pick a rate Senator.

Posted by: Obama = 0 experience = 8 more years of Bush | October 19, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Obama Broke Illinois Ethics Laws As A State Legislator
Apparently, on Obama’s released tax records, he discloses income from speaking fees. The problem? Accepting payment for speaking fees when you’re a legislator is against Illinois state law.
Apparently, as an Illinois state legislator through 2004, Barack was prohibited from taking honoraria for speaking under the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act.
But what about Barack Obama’s 2000 and 2002 tax returns?
2000: On his 2000 Schedule C-EZ, Barack reported that he received $16,500 as a “Foundation director/Educational speaker.”
2001: On his 2001 Schedule C-EZ, Barack reported $98,158 from a Chicago law firm, Miner, Barnhill, for “Legal services/attorney” (and nothing for speaking)
2002: On his 2002 Schedule C, Barack reported $34,491 for “LEGAL SERVCES / SPEAKING FEES.”
These “speaking fees” are in addition to the amounts that Barack was paid as an employee, a lecturer at the University of Chicago, reported on the first page of his 1040s.
That’s not change we can believe in.
Just to sum up, the media can find Joe the Plumber’s tax woes within 24 hours of his having dared to question The One’s narrative, but they can’t find a clear ethical violation in the released records of a man who has been campaigning for President for two years now.
Another truth-telling moment brought to you by our fair and objective news media.
http://www.kxmc.com/News/Nation/287374.asp

Posted by: LightSeeker | October 19, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

But it opens questions about his true stance on the war!!!! Obama said he loathed the war…that supporting it shows a lack of judgment. He then picks Biden who voted for the war, and now he is “basking in the glow” of an endorsement from one of the Bush henchmen that sold the war. Anyone remember that Powell report on Saddam getting uranium from another country?
Also – Powell and Sam Nunn colluded to block Clinton’s plan to end the ban on gays and lesbians in the military. Powell was adamant that it should not happen.
OBAMA = more of the same!
Unhappy liberal….

Posted by: Tommy | October 19, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

The Republicans have already been busy redistributing the wealth for the past 8 years.
They’ve been helping redistribute money from the lower and middle income groups to the top 5% of the filthy rich.
Seems fair, heh? Republican redistribution of wealth to the top 5%.
8 more year! 8 was not enough! We want MORE! Vote Republican! 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

DIANA, IT IS SO CLEAR TO SEE THAT YOU ARE A RACIST MEAN SPIRITED PERSON. I BET YOU ONLY HAVE A GED? OR MAYBE NOT

Posted by: tiff | October 19, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

No. Not by a longshot.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? Many say that what you won’t make the same mistakes that others have because of your sound judgement (ie, your choice of pastor). The only thing, Senator, is that there still remain many mistakes yet to be written into this planet’s history books. You won’t always have the benefit of others experience, you’ll have to leverage your own experience and you have too little on which to base your judgement. I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell, Mr. Matthews … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the morale, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them (I have a friend that is an Army Reservist. He is deploying, again, to Iraq. He has a wife, a son and a daughter. He does not serve so that he can kill children and raid villages Senator). What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Did you at least play with the little green plastic troops when you lived in Hawaii? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung mentally Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning and learning from one’s mistakes. The surge worked Senator.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have access to affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the still unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that President Obama’s, Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax rate applied against his $0.00 income.
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, high cost American jobs would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those finding themselves newly unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message your handlers have planted in you, that message you think the voters want to hear. I was laughing a bit, but if I understand you correctly, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created, were actually created or do actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that timeframe passes? Let me point this out to my fellow voters. Senator Obama wants to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time he wants to turnaround and give them a tax credit for jobs they create? Senator, or maybe I should be addressing your advisers, you do realize that the two are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job decrease/increase. If you can convince us that those are winning policies Senator Obama, then I’d suggest you save us all some trouble, sell the American voters a bridge to nowhere and retire, pen some books, give some speeches. Indeed, your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama, not by a long shot.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Suicide rate? Pick a rate Senator.

Posted by: zerO | October 19, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

– the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. –
Indeed.. we have been redistributing it from the middle class to the wealthy for years now.. to the point where the top 1% controls almost 40% of this nations wealth.
Thanks for pointing that out!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

The Republicans have already been busy redistributing the wealth for the past 8 years.
They’ve been helping redistribute money from the lower and middle income groups to the top 5% of the filthy rich.
8 more year! 8 was not enough! We want MORE! Vote Republican! 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Diana in California;
so I guess by your philosophy, Joe Liberman and Mitt Romney are only supporting McCain because he is white?
People are so stupid, i’ll be so pleased on November 5th when you all can continue to cry; only then it will fall on deaf ears because it will be too late!
O and Joe, Cause Colin Said So!!!

Posted by: PoliticsAsUsual | October 19, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

I think Powell’s endorsement of Obama is huge. “Some” republicans are upset by it because they wanted it for McCain but it’s too late. If he would have run an honorable campaign then maybe he would have been endorsed. If McCain would have shown better judgement during the economic crisis then maybe he could have gained Powell’s support. McCain made his own choices and has to live with them. It’s not the democrats fault. Some on the angry right need to stop blaming the rest of us for everything. It is those in your own part that are angering you.

Posted by: Daisy | October 19, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

wow! hey zerO, or whatever you’re calling yourself as you ramp up to post again. reposting very lengthy, and even thoughtful essays over and over again, does not make them right. you pretty much lost me when you applauded mccain for continuing to support tax breaks for companies who send jobs
overseas…whatever happened to ‘country first’?

Posted by: antijake | October 19, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Change we can do without… another phoney politician blabbering about how he and only he can change DC….. yeah right! NO-blah-blah… no thanks!!

Posted by: Badboy | October 19, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

It’s funny that someone said that Colin Powell, an educated black man chose color over “the right choice”. Than why does Obama poll so much better amongst educated WHITE people as well?
I would venture to say that he is far more educated than you, because he thinks this country should come before party, something most Republicans pretend they believe in, and then do the exact opposite.
Reading more of Jamesferrel’s entry just shows the Fox News puppet he really is. In fact it’s hilarious that now he is claiming that Bush is a liberal when it comes to spending!! Amazing. Every single Republican President since 1980 ends with a spending deficit and far more into debt. Only Bill Clinton ended with a surplus and cut our national debt. You’re a tool of fantasy land James. I wonder if you would even know what to talk about if Fox News didn’t feed it to you.

Posted by: Mark | October 19, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

It is interesting that the same people who say that the members of the Bush administration who took us to Iraq are a bunch of liars and war criminals are now celebrating the wisdom and good judgment of one of the people most implicated in “lying us into war.”

Posted by: frieda | October 19, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Powell lost all credibility when he lied to the UN. He’s as culpable as Bush and Cheney. did anyone see the look on his face when he was talking about it? He looked like he was going to cry. He didn’t look happy, he almost looked like he was acting.

Posted by: MBNA Joe | October 19, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Voters the Polls Neglected: All Military Branches Strongly Support McCain
http://www.militarytimes.com/static/projects/pages/081003_ep_2pp.pdf

Posted by: LightSeeker | October 19, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Didn’t BIDEN a few months ago say Obama was not ready to lead.

Posted by: Officer Vike | October 19, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

The only reason McCain chose Governor Palin is because of her race, not because she was qualified.

Posted by: Jack | October 19, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Check out the HARDBALL interview with
Rep. Michelle Bachmann (MN)
This woman EXEMPLIFIES why I will not be voting for McCain and Parrot!
I can’t believe the crap spewing from her mouth. She is McCarthy 2.0 fostered by the McPalin campaign. I sent $50 to her opponent El Tinklenberg and I live in VA.
To the Republican leadership, “Freedom” apparently means we’re free to think just like they do.
“Freedom of Religion” now means we’re free to be Methodist, Baptist, or Presbiterians.
We cannot let these facist A-holes take our country!

Posted by: GOP = "Freedom", it's just a word right? | October 19, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

– Voters the Polls Neglected: All Military Branches Strongly Support McCain –
McCain sits on the Armed Forces committee and is a shoot first ask questions war candidate.
However, veterans are overwhelmingly supporting Obama..
Obama sits on the Veterans Affairs committee and believes, like our country always has until recently, that military force is a last resort option.
Who would of thunk it..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

zerO:
That screen name about sums up your intelligence when you post quite a long post (probably cut and pasted from somewhere) several times under another screen name along with this one.
Maybe you want the Corporations to continue to run America, but you are clearly in the minority on that one.
It’s time for a change and that change is NOT John McSame (a Wolf in Sheep’s clothing is still a Wolf, and John McSame can talk Change and Maverick, but every day he makes it more clear he is a neocon tool.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: jackt51 | October 19, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

The only reason Powell endorsed Obama is because of his race./
In America we still have secret elections. BUt the Democrats led by Obama want to destroy that sacred right to VOTE with groups like ACORN
ACORN=GATE

Posted by: Jack | October 19, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

How has Powell’s endorsement suddenly given Obama experience. He still served only 143 days in U.S. Senate before deciding he was ready for the presidency, he still has not written a bill on his own, he still has no idea what the difference is between Revenue and Profit, he he still pushing “socialism” with his “spread the wealth” position.
Powells endorsement didn’t wipe away Obama’s friendship with an unrepentent murdering terrorist or a criminal, Rezko. He still sat in a Black Liberation theolgy church with his family listening to Rev Wright spew his hate for whites and America for 20 yrs. Obama’s extensive association with ACORN and the $832,000 he gave them to help when this election is still out there. He’s still part of the failed Democratic Congress and their passion for spending and welfare growth.
Oh and Hamas and Hezbollah and Louis Farakhan are all still endorsing him.
Nope, nothings changed, Obama is still an inexperienced liar.
Maybe if Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi’s endorses him I might reconsider…………Oh wait he did endorse Obama. Nope still not voting for him.

Posted by: Sean A | October 19, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I work for a corporation but want the GOVERNMENT to take it over run by Obama so he can run it out of the COUNTRY

Posted by: jackt51 | October 19, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Same old crowd spewing the same old lines.. I would of thought the McCain camp could come up with some fresh new character attacks to distract from their dismal policy stances.. guess not.. is it no wonder the polls continue to dive for McCain.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Interesting how when Colin Powell endorses Obama, instead of accepting that the right-wingers prefer to trash Powell. Just keep listening to all of your creepy talk radio goons. They tell you what to think.

Posted by: Donna Hughes | October 19, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Hannity has “Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism” on fox news right now. It’s very interesting to listen to the victims of Obama’s friends, Ayers and Doern.

Posted by: Sean A | October 19, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Don’t take it from Biden…
“What that just did in one sound bite…is that it eliminated the experience argument.”
(Former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on Colin Powell’s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama)

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 19, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

antijake,
I lost you, because you are to stupid to realize that if those tax cuts (tax cuts for all corporations, including those that have, have not, might be considering and might not be considering exporting jobs overseas, in order to remain competitive) were not granted, even MORE jobs would have been exported.
I’ll write it in crayon for you: you have two choices to purchase brain to add to your clear lack thereof. One vendor will charge you $323/ounce another will charge you $134/ounce. From which vendor will you buy your brain? Sorry, $323 is not the right answer. You see you could actually pay less by paying $134.
Businesses would also choose the low cost vendor all else equal. Tax expense is a business cost. If it is worth it (the tax rate differences between the U.S. and another location are great enough) then they may well wish to export their jobs.
antijake, I am sorry you are naive. But when Sen. Osama states that McCain supported tax cuts for corporations that exported jobs overseas, the bill didn’t actually instruct the IRS to give a lower tax rate to corporations that exported the jobs. It intructed the IRS to apply a lower rate to all corporations. So, you see, your messiah is actually distorting a fact to make political hay, with, well, people like you.
I hope that helps you out.

Posted by: antijake Tutor session | October 19, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

‘Obama gets cold reception in NC diner’
============================
I thought that was awesome. Again Obama shows he is looking out for everyone. Even the ignorant morons.
He had the willingness to try and talk to a dumbass who obviously gets all her information from Faux and Limbaugh.
And she showed what a truly classless person she was by not shaking his hand. Exemplifies what has become of the GOP “base”. More right wing Bible thumping hypocrites.

Posted by: President Obama! | October 19, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

To the Creep with the repeated long posts. Do you really think anyone is going to do anything but scroll past them quickly? I saw your act at another listing today, and I didn’t read those either, but I surely would take the time to report you if they had such a link here!

Posted by: Donna Hughes | October 19, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

It’s very interesting to listen to the victims of Obama’s friends, Ayers and Doern.
Wow, good thing we aren’t voting for them, isn’t it! Oh, that’s right, we are supposed to ‘think’ that by voting for Obama that we really are voting for all of his tenuous associations as well.. hmmm.. looks like the more intelligent voters don’t buy that argument either.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108043/Candidate-Support-Education.aspx

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

No. Not by a longshot, not even close.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? Many say that what you won’t make the same mistakes that others have because of your sound judgement (ie, your choice of pastor). The only thing, Senator, is that there still remain many mistakes yet to be written into this planet’s history books. You won’t always have the benefit of others experience, you’ll have to leverage your own experience and you have too little on which to base your judgement. I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell, Mr. Matthews … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the morale, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them (I have a friend that is an Army Reservist. He is deploying, again, to Iraq. He has a wife, a son and a daughter. He does not serve so that he can kill children and raid villages Senator). What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Did you at least play with the little green plastic troops when you lived in Hawaii? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung mentally Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning and learning from one’s mistakes. The surge worked Senator.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have access to affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the still unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that President Obama’s, Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax rate applied against his $0.00 income.
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, high cost American jobs would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those finding themselves newly unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message your handlers have planted in you, that message you think the voters want to hear. I was laughing a bit, but if I understand you correctly, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created, were actually created or do actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that timeframe passes? Let me point this out to my fellow voters. Senator Obama wants to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time he wants to turnaround and give them a tax credit for jobs they create? Senator, or maybe I should be addressing your advisers, you do realize that the two are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job decrease/increase. If you can convince us that those are winning policies Senator Obama, then I’d suggest you save us all some trouble, sell the American voters a bridge to nowhere and retire, pen some books, give some speeches. Indeed, your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama, not by a long shot.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Suicide rate? Pick a rate Senator.

Posted by: Obama is as experienced as my Uncle Lurch | October 19, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

It’s very interesting to listen to the victims of Obama’s friends, Ayers and Doern.
——————–
But PINHEADS like yourself will ignore all the families who lost their entire life’s savings because of McCain’s good buddy Keating.
McCain HELPED Keating stall regulators. McCain took $100,000 from Keating. McCain vacationed with Keating.
Did Obama ever help the Weather Underground in any way? No.

Posted by: Who REALLY pals around with terroists? | October 19, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

– I’ll write it in crayon for you –
Apparently crayon is appropriate. Most corporations pay no federal tax anyway, so you can triple or quadruple the corporate tax rate and they will continue using tax code loopholes to pay zero..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Jack51 your lucky Bush didn’t run it to China, whats wrong with socialism the definition doesn’t sound so bad as for the other jack Mcbush picked palin because of her gender not race he wants the Hillary votes. And maybe if Powell hadn’t been screwed by the republican party namely Bush things would have been different after his speech at the Un he found out he was lied to.
Socialism=a theory or system of social organization in which the means of production and distribution of goods are owned and controlled collectively OR by the government.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 19, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Oh and Hamas and Hezbollah and Louis Farakhan are all still endorsing him.
Nope, nothings changed, Obama is still an inexperienced liar.
Maybe if Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi’s endorses him I might reconsider…………Oh wait he did endorse Obama. Nope still not voting for him.
Posted by: Sean A
————————————-
Stay tuned…
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – the President of Iran – will be the next one to endorse Obama. And, Obama will return the favor by having tea with Ahmadinejad somewhere downtown Tehran, while watching the “public hangings” of Iranian citizens.

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

– the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies –
Yup, we have been redistributing it from the middle class to the wealthy for years.. just like McCain wants to continue doing. The top 1% now controls almost 40% of the nations wealth. And while trickle down looks good on paper, the unemployment rate has gone from 3.9% when Bush took office and implemented his trickle down tax plan, to it’s current rate of 6.1% it hit in August. There is a name for people who continue doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results, and it isn’t a flattering one.
Thanks for pointing that out!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Don’t forget liddy. McCain really is buddies with G. Gordon Liddy… who is a genuine, convicted, american terrorist.

Posted by: tt | October 19, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Charlie Keating, the banker and anti-pornography crusader, would ultimately be convicted on 73 counts of fraud and racketeering for his role in the savings-and-loan scandal of the 1980s. That crisis, much like today’s subprime-mortgage meltdown, resulted from misbegotten banking deregulation, and ultimately left taxpayers to pick up a tab of more than $124 billion.
Keating, who raised more than $100,000 for McCain’s race, lavished the first-term congressman with the kind of political favors that would make Jack Abramoff blush. McCain and his family took at least nine free trips at Keating’s expense, and vacationed nearly every year at the mogul’s estate in the Bahamas. There they would spend the days yachting and snorkeling and attending extravagant parties in a world McCain referred to as “Charlie Keating’s Shangri-La.” Keating also invited Cindy McCain and her father to invest in a real estate venture for which he promised a 26 percent return on investment. They plunked down more than $350,000

Posted by: "zer0" must stand for his IQ? | October 19, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Out of five, McCain and another democrat were found innocent, the other three, all democrats were found guilty. McCain was used by Keating. I’m sure that if McCain knew what Keating was all about he would not have been friends with him. As it was, McCain testified against Keating and helped put him in prison.
Obama was friends with Ayers even knowing that he and his group KILLED a police officer and tried to kill a Supreme Court justice and his family by firebombing their house with children inside.

Posted by: Sean A | October 19, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

omg, I’m so dissappointed that Sen. Obama accepted Gen. Powell’s endorsement so gleefully. In September, he chided Sen. McCain’s campaign’s deputy strategist’s assistant manager’s vice press secretary’s scribe for saying that character was an issue in this election as well as policy positions. Gen. Powell’s endorsement today was strictly about personality. Sen. Obama is more magnificent, electrifying, transcendent, unifying, ect… yes, Sen. Obama is not only the better debater but the better teleprompter-reader, too. But what about the issues? Like the economy, healthcare, banking, and war? Senator Obama should reject Gen. Powell’s endorsement until he makes it in additional to just on the grounds of personality. Until then, I’m switching my vote to Sen. McCain.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 19, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:
Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi:
“Obama Suffers Inferiority Complex That Might Make Him Behave “Whiter Than the White.” He Should Be Proud of His African, Muslim Identity. Ben-Gurion Gave the Green Light for the Killing of JFK ….”
TEXT (Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008)
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1791.htm
VIDEO – Qadhafi: Obama is a Muslim – Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/gaddafi-obama-is-a-muslim/2563816338/?icid=VIDURVNWS07

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Just FYI Lurch. No one reads long ranting posts. Ever. if you want someone to read your rant, you might break it up into bite size pieces. Otherwise you are obviously just cutting and pasting and taking up space — and no one cares.
Get a grip fella.
Oh and by the way, get used to calling Obama your president!
Har har..

Posted by: ShutUpLurch | October 19, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Mr. Biden,
Are you serious? I have always thought you have a much better judgment.
Powell is the most dangerous person in the Bush administration who has done more damage that any other person to this country. It is Powell who rigorously promoted and led the country into a Bush’s war. It is Powell who has destroyed the World trust of the USA, thanks to his relentless propaganda of the Bush’s doctrine of war.
He is either lying or completely incompetent.
Now, his endorsement, being one of the 98%, to his Affirmative Action candidate is a reassurance to the people?
What is your guarantee that he is not making the same boneheaded mistake as he did at the UN?

Posted by: Atom | October 19, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

In the year before his Senate run, McCain had championed legislation that would have delayed new regulations of savings and loans. Grateful, Keating contributed $54,000 to McCain’s Senate campaign. Now, when Keating tried to stack the federal regulatory bank board with cronies, McCain made a phone call seeking to push them through. In 1987, in an unprecedented display of political intimidation, McCain also attended two meetings convened by Keating to pressure federal regulators to back off. The senators who participated in the effort would come to be known as the Keating Five.
“Senate historians were unable to find any instance in U.S. history that was comparable, in terms of five U.S. senators meeting with a regulator on behalf of one institution,” says Bill Black, then deputy director of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, who attended the second meeting. “And it hasn’t happened since.”
Following the meetings with McCain and the other senators, the regulators backed off, stalling their investigation of Lincoln. By the time the S&L collapsed two years later, taxpayers were on the hook for $3.4 billion, which stood as a record for the most expensive bank failure — until the current mortgage crisis. In addition, 20,000 investors who had bought junk bonds from Keating, thinking they were federally insured, had their savings wiped out.
“McCain saw the political pressure on the regulators,” recalls Black. “He could have saved these widows from losing their life savings. But he did absolutely nothing.”

Posted by: "zer0" must stand for his IQ? | October 19, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Obamacrat, are you nuts? did you listen to Powell. He spent ten minutes explaining in minute detail about why he is supporting Obama, the real differences between the two AND the policy differences. Stop crying over this. Get over it. Find someone to endorse your BFF McCain… maybe someone important like… umm… Chuck Norris.

Posted by: Obamacrat-is-a-moron | October 19, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Not only does the Powell support speaks of the judgement of character for Obama, but McCain using the same man who maliciously maligned him/his own family speaks volume on the lack of character he(McCain) has for himself, his family, and America. Selfishness, self seeking above all forms of decency,honor, and respect is what drives McCain now. Pitiful, Shameful, and Unworthy!!!

Posted by: ROC2341 | October 19, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

– Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – the President of Iran – will be the next one to endorse Obama –
Wouldn’t that be way cool! Just like Powell said:
“We have managed to convey to the world that we are more unilateral than we really are. The new president is going to have to fix the reputation that we’ve left with the rest of the world … and show that there is a new president, a new administration that is looking forward to working with our friends and allies. And in my judgment, also willing to talk to people who we have not been willing to talk to before. Because this is a time for outreach”.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

The Republicans have already been busy redistributing the wealth for the past 8 years.
They’ve been helping redistribute money from the lower and middle income groups to the top 5% of the filthy rich.
8 more year! 8 was not enough! We want MORE! Vote Republican! 8 more years!
Seriously, 8 years of Republicans in the White House was enough . .. its the Democrats’ turn – and by the way the Democrats are not demons despite what the nutjob right might say. Many Republicans will be voting Democrat this time – enough is enough.

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

McCain was found innocent in a court of law. But he was found to have used “extremely poor judgment” by the senate, and he was reprimanded. That is NOT what we need in the white house, someone who has no judgment.
And lets get real. Liddy admitted that plotted to kill people also, and McCain is his buddy.
The Ayers issue is just stupid slime being thrown around because McCain is losing so badly on the real issues.

Posted by: Keating | October 19, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

McCain was NOT declared innocent in the Keating Five case! He was found to have used BAD JUDGMENT!
John Mccain is anything but the innocent, unsuspecting guy being duped by Keating! He has fanagled more things by using the clout of his family than I’m sure he would admit to! He’s just as bad as George W Bush and maybe even worse. He has flip-flopped his “principles” every time the wind changed.

Posted by: Donna Hughes | October 19, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

– Powell is the most dangerous person in the Bush administration who has done more damage that any other person to this country. It is Powell who rigorously promoted and led the country into a Bush’s war –
Don’t look now, but McCain was pushing as hard or harder for the unprovoked invasion into Iraq.. might want to take off them GOP sunglasses, they appear to be interfering with your view on reality.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Unfortunately, any lessons McCain learned from the Keating scandal didn’t affect his unbridled enthusiasm for deregulating the finance industry. “He continues to follow policies that create the same kind of environment we see today, with recurrent financial crises and epidemics of fraud led by CEOs,” says Black, the former S&L regulator. Indeed, if the current financial crisis has a villain, it is Phil Gramm, who remains close to McCain. As chair of the Senate Banking Committee in the late 1990s, Gramm ushered in — with McCain’s fervent support — a massive wave of deregulation for insurance companies and brokerage houses and banks, the aftershocks of which are just now being felt in Wall Street’s catastrophic collapse. McCain, who has admitted that “the issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should,” relies on Gramm to guide him.
McCain also did his part to loosen regulations on big corporations. In 1997, McCain became chairman of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee, which oversees the insurance and telecommunications industries, as well as the CEO pay packages of those McCain now denounces as “fat cats.” The special interests with business before the committee were big and well-heeled. All told, executives and fundraisers associated with these firms donated $2.6 million to McCain when he served as the chairman or ranking member.

Posted by: "zer0" must stand for his IQ? | October 19, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

HERE IS EXACTLY WHAT WE CAN EXPECT FROM A SOCIALIST PRESIDENT, BARACK OBAMA:
With Barack Obama as president, all the wealth in America will be redistributed to those who refuse to work for it.
This, in turn, will destroy America’s productivity – which will mean that there will be less wealth to “spread around”.
Therefore, Barack Obama will find it necessary to increase taxes on those who work. This, again, will destroy America’s productivity.
Business of all sizes will close, more and more people will be out of work, and looking for support from the government.
This will mean a severe shortfall in tax revenue for the Socialist programs that Liberals hold dear.
And again, Barack Obama will raise your taxes. This will make even the wealthiest working Americans destitute and starving.
Then America will be simply overtaken by its enemies.
Sounds good to you?
Go ahead and vote for Obama.

Posted by: One_American | October 19, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

HERE IS EXACTLY WHAT WE CAN EXPECT FROM A SOCIALIST PRESIDENT, BARACK OBAMA:
With Barack Obama as president, all the wealth in America will be redistributed to those who refuse to work for it.
This, in turn, will destroy America’s productivity – which will mean that there will be less wealth to “spread around”.
Therefore, Barack Obama will find it necessary to increase taxes on those who work. This, again, will destroy America’s productivity.
Business of all sizes will close, more and more people will be out of work, and looking for support from the government.
This will mean a severe shortfall in tax revenue for the Socialist programs that Liberals hold dear.
And again, Barack Obama will raise your taxes. This will make even the wealthiest working Americans destitute and starving.
Then America will be simply overtaken by its enemies.
Sounds good to you?
Go ahead and vote for Obama.

Posted by: One_American | October 19, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Sean A:
As is usual with you Repugnants, your post isfull of inaccuracies.
Cindy McSame continues to be a business partner with Keating. And Keating is by far not the only questionable association McSame has — there’s G. Gordon Liddy of Watergate fame, who advocates violence bythe ultra-right, and has donated $$ to McSame.
Obama and Ayers are NOT “friends” except maybe in the same sense that McSame calls us all “MY Friends (I’m certainly not one). They served together on a board and their children went to the same school (but probably at different times. There was no association that in any way related to Ayers views from his days as an Anti-War Radical during the Vietnam-Era when Barack Obama was about eight years old.
This line of attack clearly is not working for McSame, so why beat a dead horse.
President Obama — get used to it!
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: jackt51 | October 19, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

ignorant moron….dumb ass…classless person according to PO(S) describes the GOP…hummm obviously a democrat and obama supporter.. need I say more..LOL

Posted by: socalvoter | October 19, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

– HERE IS EXACTLY WHAT WE CAN EXPECT FROM A SOCIALIST PRESIDENT, BARACK OBAMA: –
What are next weeks lotto numbers while you are at it?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

antijake, you’re a pompous ass. Where are your solutions? Are you happy with the crashing economy, two wars, our addiction to oil, our lowered standing in the world? I’M NOT, and a growing number of other folks are not, either. I’ve worked hard my whole life as an educator to pay my house payment, raise my sons and take care of those less fortunate than myself. The Republicans have had their chance and we are in a HUGE MESS!!! Time to pass the batan…

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

– Time to pass the batan… –
Lets just hope Bush doesn’t drop it before Obama get there..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Biden: Powell Endorsement Means ‘No More Questions’ About Obama’s Readiness
————————————-
Joe Biden is an IDIOT!
If Powell had endorsed Senator McCain, Biden as well as the left-wing-liberal media clowns would be saying, “Powell the man who made that famous speech at the UN about Hussein having weapons of mass destruction – that man fellow Democrats is endorsing McCain…My fellow Democrats the Powell endorcement is another sign that McCain is 4 more years of thr Bush clan!”
Yeap, that is exactly what Obama bin Biden and the media would be saying today if Powell had endorced McCain.
Did Powell say anything extraordinary about Joe Biden? Hmmmm, perhaps he should have talked about Biden’s character – Biden’s plagiarism, which caused him to abandon one of his many Presidential bids!

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Concerned American,
I’d be concerned about the quality of the information you’re relying on. Indeed most corporations do pay taxes. Do me a favor, find a public company. Go to their website. Click on the link for investors. Click on the link to the 10-K and read it. Do a text search for the following phrases: income taxes, income tax expense, provision for income taxes Read and note the number and, if you care to write fact, alter your posts.
As far as concentrating wealth. The kids at google earned, again, they earned their wealth. Oh, and in the process, they have and still are employing many Americans. If you’re sore that you are not wealthy, then get off your rear and start a business, just don’t make over $250,000!

Posted by: Concerned about stupid Americans | October 19, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Bye Bye John and Sarah, time to go

Posted by: Peter Jackson | October 19, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

gmarie,
You are far too nice! The republicans dropped that baton, ran over it and crushed it into the ground, out of sight! We are still searching for the damn thing!

Posted by: Donna Hughes | October 19, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

– Did Powell say anything extraordinary about Joe Biden? –
No, but he did take a slam at the moose hunter:
“She’s a very distinguished woman, and she’s to be admired. But at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don’t believe she’s ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president,” he said. “And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Sen. McCain made.”
And took a couple jabs at McCains campaign, saying it “goes too far”, and added:
“This Bill Ayers situation that’s been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign,” Powell said. “But Mr. McCain says that he’s a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him?”

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

since when has any sense of reality stopped the McCain campaign from stating what it wants?

Posted by: Thinking | October 19, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I see alll the right-wing talking points at play here. Thank G-d for factcheck.org:
ON AYERS:
“we object to (…) the McCain-Palin campaign’s attempts to sway voters – in ads and on the stump – with false and misleading statements about the relationship, which was never very close. Obama never ‘lied’ about this, just as he never bragged about it. The foundation they both worked with was hardly ‘radical.’ And Ayers is more than a former ‘terrorist,’ he’s also a well-known figure in the field of education.”
ON ACORN:
“The McCain-Palin campaign accuses ACORN, a community activist group that operates nationwide, of perpetrating ‘massive voter fraud.’ It says Obama has ‘long and deep’ ties to the group. We find both claims to be exaggerated.”
“Neither ACORN nor its employees have been found guilty of, or even charged with, casting fraudulent votes. What a McCain-Palin Web ad calls ‘voter fraud’ is actually voter registration fraud. Several ACORN canvassers have been found guilty of faking registration forms and others are being investigated. But the evidence that has surfaced so far shows they faked forms to get paid for work they didn’t do, not to stuff ballot boxes.”
ON TAX-CREDITS:
“A new McCain-Palin Web ad characterizes Obama’s proposed refundable tax credits as ‘welfare.’ But McCain himself proposes refundable tax credits, too, as part of his health care plan, and calls them ‘reform.’
The ad also says ‘hard-working families’ and ‘seniors’ would pay higher taxes. But – need we say this again? – that would be true only for the affluent few, not for the many.”

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 19, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

One_American – are you on CRACK? The Republicans have squandered a huge surplus and left us with a multi-billion dollar deficit. Because McCain’s economic guru pushed deregulation, we are headed for a depression. The corporate-owned Republicans have acted in blatant self-interest in blunder after blunder. You people are amazing!!! Your ability to rationalize the greed and ineptitude of your own party is mind-boggling! And, by the way, I’m proud to be called a liberals. (ooooo, what a put-down – we care for people other than ourselves)

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Biden: Powell Endorsement Means ‘No More Questions’ About Obama’s Readiness
————————————–
Speak for yourself Joe (stupid parrot!)
Make sure you do not plagiarize anything between now an November 4th – you would not want That One to loose ther election because of your stupidity.

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

– Indeed most corporations do pay taxes –
Quick link.. I’ll provide more after dinner :)
Cisco Systems, the second-most valuable company in America, paid no federal income taxes for its latest fiscal year thanks to a little-known corporate tax break on employee stock options.
Microsoft, which ranks No. 4 in market value, did not pay any federal taxes either, it seems.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/10/09/MN3707.DTL
Gotta love them loopholes ;)

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

MORE EVIDENCE OF TYPICAL GOP & SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN HYPOCRISY!!
- – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Posted by: southern hospitality | Oct 19, 2008 8:15:04 PM
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obamas_a_socialist_woman_shout.html
by Christi Parsons
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C.–
“Socialist, socialist, socialist!” said Diane Fanning, 54, a Sam’s Club employee. “Get out of here.”
But there was no disputing the animosity later, when Obama tried to shake Fanning’s hand. She refused the gesture.
- – -
WEL, WELL BARRY! IT LOOKS LIKE MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE IN NC..HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
= = = = = = = =
Hi “Southern Hospitality”,
What you failed to include on your comments, is the part where Diane Fanning is a member of a local ‘hypocritical GOD fearing Evangelical, White-Preferred Christian Church’. That Presbyterian Church is known for its rebel-grey, Jesse James confederate support. Church members like Fanning read all of James Dobson’s ‘Focus on the Family’ books, but still practice hate when someone extends a hand of friendship as did Senator Obama.
I disagree with your statement above regarding money buying love in North Carolina. The money Senator Obama’s 3.3-million donors have raise to take the nation back from lobbyist, in support of the middle-class, has no bearing on people like Fanning who is so hateful she is out of the reach of simple reasoning, logic and everyday ‘true southern hospitality’.
It is amazing how these hypocritical Christians like Fanning go to church on Sunday and sing songs about going to Heaven, but won’t shake the hands of their Christian brothers here on earth like Senator Obama.
See paragraphs below as some of the parts that “Southern Hospitality” intentionally left out.
= = = = = = = = =
QUOTE FROM http://WWW.SWAMPPOLITICS.COM – -
“Later, Obama came to the long table where Fanning and other members of a local First Presbyterian church were gathered. He held out his hand to her to shake it and asked, “How are you, ma’am?” but she declined to shake.”
“He spoke at length with many of the others parishioners at the long banquet table, however, and got a much friendlier reception as he spoke about health care, taxes and social security. Fanning told your pooler, “Some of ‘em are just nicer than I am. I know how some of ‘em think.” ”
= = = = = = = = = =
GOD Bless the United States of America!
GOD Bless the Obama-Biden Leadership Team!
. . .and FATHER forgive Diane Fanning; for she know not what she do.

Posted by: Perusing-Through | October 19, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Natasha,
But Colin Powell didn’t endorse McCain. That is why YOU are trashing him. Had he endorsed McCain then YOU would be speaking in glowing terms about him!

Posted by: Donna Hughes | October 19, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Thank G-d for factcheck.org:
Posted by El_Pajaro
———————————
Obama, Bill Ayers, and FactCheck.Org… all have ties to Annenberg.

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

MORE EVIDENCE OF TYPICAL GOP & SOUTHERN CHRISTIAN HYPOCRISY!!
- – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Posted by: southern hospitality | Oct 19, 2008 8:15:04 PM
http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obamas_a_socialist_woman_shout.html
by Christi Parsons
FAYETTEVILLE, N.C.–
“Socialist, socialist, socialist!” said Diane Fanning, 54, a Sam’s Club employee. “Get out of here.”
But there was no disputing the animosity later, when Obama tried to shake Fanning’s hand. She refused the gesture.
- – -
QUOTE from “Southern Hospitality”:
“WEL, WELL BARRY! IT LOOKS LIKE MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE IN NC..HAHAHAHAHAHA!! ”
= = = = = = = =
Hi “Southern Hospitality”,
What you failed to include on your comments, is the part where Diane Fanning is a member of a local ‘hypocritical GOD fearing Evangelical, White-Preferred Christian Church’. That Presbyterian Church is known for its rebel-grey, Jesse James confederate support. Church members like Fanning read all of James Dobson’s ‘Focus on the Family’ books, but still practice hate when someone extends a hand of friendship as did Senator Obama.
I disagree with your statement above regarding money buying love in North Carolina. The money Senator Obama’s 3.3-million donors have raise to take the nation back from lobbyist, in support of the middle-class, has no bearing on people like Fanning who is so hateful she is out of the reach of simple reasoning, logic and everyday ‘true southern hospitality’.
It is amazing how these hypocritical Christians like Fanning go to church on Sunday and sing songs about going to Heaven, but won’t shake the hands of their Christian brothers here on earth like Senator Obama.
See paragraphs below as some of the parts that “Southern Hospitality” intentionally left out.
= = = = = = = = =
QUOTE FROM http://WWW.SWAMPPOLITICS.COM – -
“Later, Obama came to the long table where Fanning and other members of a local First Presbyterian church were gathered. He held out his hand to her to shake it and asked, “How are you, ma’am?” but she declined to shake.”
“He spoke at length with many of the others parishioners at the long banquet table, however, and got a much friendlier reception as he spoke about health care, taxes and social security. Fanning told your pooler, “Some of ‘em are just nicer than I am. I know how some of ‘em think.” ”
= = = = = = = = = =
GOD Bless the United States of America!
GOD Bless the Obama-Biden Leadership Team!
. . .and FATHER forgive Diane Fanning; for she know not what she do.

Posted by: Perusing-Through | October 19, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

– If you’re sore that you are not wealthy, then get off your rear and start a business, just don’t make over $250,000! –
Whoops, my bad.. I have more than that in my checking account :)
Don’t worry, I’m still voting Obama for the good of the country and my children who will inherit it, not the good of my pocketbook. It’s pretty simple really, we have to pay for our government spending, and cutting taxes doesn’t go to far towards that goal.
Also, I guess McCain considers someone making over $100K the average ‘main street’.. since that is how much you will have to make before seeing any tax cuts. Maybe in his neighborhood, but not around here.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/
May Allah be with you :)

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

As many of my fellow Canadians ,I have been watching the Presidential campaign with great interest. Its been disheartening to see the vicious slimy campaign being waged against the first African American candidate for Presidency. And many of us wonder how it is that such hateful racism is allowed to continue…surely this isnt typical of Amercian politics? Attacking a man’s character rather then his policies is reprehensible. Sen. Obama, to many of us, is the person we see as the man who can be the agent of change needed in this unstable world we now live in..both economically and internationally. Its very difficult for those of us who were not familiar with Sen. McCain prior to this campaign to comprehend how he was considered a man of great honour. A man of honour and strong moral values would not allow this type of dishonorable campaign!! It must be an embarrassment to many Americans to see the type of borderline racial hatred being displayed at the Palin /McCain rallies.As well as the vicious lies being espoused by the McCain Rebublican campaign. I cant imagine how hurtful this rhetoric is to minorities living in the US..especially blacks and Muslims…
Its bewildering to many of us that the type of rhetoric and the antics (like the robocalls)are not more loudly condemned by the media??? There have been mild reprimands to be sure…but it has been mild. Freedom of speech should not mean those who wish to promote hatred and racism be allowed to do so!! Please speak out loudly and clearly that what the Republicans are doing is wrong!! It is unfortunately hurting America’s reputation as a inclusive society..a society that will not tolerate racial divide!!

Posted by: Dee | October 19, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

– you would not want That One to loose ther election because of your stupidity. –
Naw, McCain’s stupidity is enough to win the election for Obama.. but we are glad you are so concerned Natasha.. welcome aboard!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Deer Concerned,
I’ll help you out. Maybe don’t rely on the Nancy Pelosi Times to get your corporate income tax information. Your article is about the year 2000, which, I think included tax law in effect under the Clinton/Lewinsky Administration. Let me bring you up to date!
Please go here:
http://investor.cisco.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-08-166496
Page 6 of the report. “Provision for income taxes: 2008 = $2.2 billion ; 2007 $2.1 billion
Similarly for Microsoft:
http://www.microsoft.com/msft/aspx/secfilings.aspx
click on the 10-K reports:
page 41
provision for income taxes: 2008 = $6.1 billion ; $6.0 billion ; 2007 $5.6 billion

Posted by: Still concerned about stupid Americans | October 19, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Your post is spot on Dee.. it is indeed sad that the Republican party, for the 3rd election cycle in a row now, has resorted to such tactics and shows their only motivation is to win at any cost. The mastermind behind such tactics is Karl Rove, who is now backing the GOP and instrumental in it’s campaign strategy.. although even he has gone on record saying that McCain has gone over the top.
Hopefully, with Obama winning the election in November, it will set the country back on it’s previous path and change the atmosphere and tactics used in future elections.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

@Natasha
And so did Ronald Reagan. That is what is so funny about this made-up controversy.
Walter H. Annenberg, the founder of the Annenberg Foundation, was a distinguished diplomat and a close friend of the Reagans. He was the one who introduced President Reagan to Margaret Thatcher, did you know that?

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 19, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Obama is ready to lead as commander-in-chief.
Acropolis Review has a summary of some good reasons to consider supporting Obama. Be sure to send it to undecided friends:
http://acropolisreview.com/2008/04/top-reasons-to-give-barack-obama-your.html

Posted by: Jean | October 19, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Natasha,
But Colin Powell didn’t endorse McCain. That is why YOU are trashing him. Had he endorsed McCain then YOU would be speaking in glowing terms about him!
Posted by: Donna Hughes
———————————–
No my dear, in fact Powell’s endorcemnt would have done more harm that good to McCain for the reasons explained in my comment. I would have preferred Powell to keep quiet – not endorsing any of the two candidates.
It was the other day that feaking CNN had a special report on Powell’s speech at the UN (2003) and balsted him and our Intelligence agencies. Today, CNN is considering Powell’s endorcement of Obama as an endorcement coming form God!
You left-wing-liberals can not have it both ways. Up to now you were trashing Powell because of his UN speech – now he is GOD, hah?
I can tell you one thing for sure…Although I disagree with Powell I still respect him as a person. I have absolutely NO respect for Marxist Barack Obama.

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

…got to go to bed Concerned. Enjoy your dinner, your stupidity and that fat checking account you have….hmn…..do you think The One might ever consider a tax on average daily checking account balances?….hmn…
xxoo

Posted by: Obama / Biden / Stalin / Concerned 08 | October 19, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I have a question for everyone that believes in Obama’s “Spreading the Wealth” around as well as anyone or company that is make above $250,000 is rich. Did it occur to anyone of you who will be hurt the most by Obama’s “spread the wealth around” plan? Have you ever thought about the non-profits companies that do not get a single dime from the federal gov’t? I guess you haven’t because these companies rely on Exxon, GE, AT&T, big major coporations that now will see their profits dwindle and will cut back on their donations to non profit organizations. Think about that. Oh yea one other thing, if big major corps. make less profits, what investor will want to invest their monies into major corp. when the profits are only 5% and the investor is only making 2% on the return of their money? I hope you think about this before you vote. think about the single mother with 2 kids that makes $10 an hour and the ex-husband won’t pay child support because he is a dead beat. But Obama is going to fine the single mother for not providing health insurance for her 2 kids.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 19, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Colin Powell didn’t give a convincing endorcement that would indicate Obama’s readiness to lead our country;it was an endorsement of Obama’s cool demeanor,which doesn’t convince too many people about Obama’s ability to lead.John McCain was right about the surge,and stuck with his correct assessment even though he knew it wasn’t the politically expedient thing to do.That’s the kind of leader our troops deserve!Also, everyone please educate youselves about Obama/Biden’s GLOBAL POVERTY ACT at http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=302222641317480 It’s Obama’s plan to make the U.S.accountable to the UN to relieve GLOBAL POVERTY!

Posted by: Kim | October 19, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Well hello redneck Republicans,
Your whole party runs on fear-tactics, that’s the only way you can win elections.
How many of you fools have now mentioned that Colin Powell endorsed Obama because he is black!! That would be like saying General Petreaus endorsed McCain because he is white.
You people are so ignorant it’s amazing. Go back to that Alaskan meth lab and hang out with the hunters and red necks. Let the power-elite and intellectual liberals continue to run the hyper-urban areas, while the Republicans hang out in shacks in places like rural Oklahoma and Alabama, begging for the government to give US (wealthy democrats) more tax breaks. Keep going along that line of logic and you’ll be further impoverished and the chasm between US (wealthy democrats) and the poor (many redneck Republicans) will keep growing.
liberal dominated media
liberal dominated higher education
liberal dominated Hollywood
Redneck Republicans want more tax breaks for the wealthy democrats!, okay — you got it! Hope you enjoy living in squalor.

Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

As far as I am concerned..nether dems nor repubs have given us much of a choice..time for a third party and that means including them in debates…I will vote for nether mccain nor obama..

Posted by: socalvoter | October 19, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Powell’s endorsement of Obama does not change my mind … I stand with MCCAIN/PALIN.
Powell endorses Obama because Powell has a bone to pick with the Bush Administration. Powell thinks the Bush administration has not been fair to him and that he was somewhat of a scapegoat for Iraq.
Powell aside, bottom line is: Do we have enough Americans out there, Republicans, Independents, Democrats, black or white, yellow or brown, green or purple for that matter, rich or poor, fat or thin who do not want to see an America run by OBAMA, PELOSI AND REID.
Do we have enough Americans who can see sense and know that we CANNOT have an America in the full hands of OBAMA, PELOSI and REID.
THAT SPELLS ONLY ONE THING – DISASTER FOR THE COUNTRY WE ALL LOVE.
Just look at their records … the most LIBERAL THERE IS … LOOK AT OBAMA’S TIES WITH REZDO, AYERS AND FRAUDULENT ACORN. LOOK AT PELOSI and REID’S inability to lead the last 2 years … Congress’s approval rating under Pelosi is even worst than when it was under the Republicans.
America, use your common sense. We all have that … BALANCE in government PROTECTS US ALL.
THINK HARD WHEN YOU ARE IN THE POLLING BOOTH – AND VOTE FOR COUNTRY FIRST …
GOOD NIGHT …

Posted by: THINK AMERICA THINK | October 19, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

El_Pajaro: I know all about Reagan and Annenberg. We are speaking about The Annenberg Foundation – not Annenberg himself. Obama and Ayers have ties to Annenberg Foundation and Annenberg runs Fact.Ckeck.ORG.

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Enough with this surprise endorsement! What did you expect? Powell to endorse McCain? This is the most racialized election this country has ever seen! Powell was the one who sent us to war but Obama is quite happy with this endorsement and his Vice President who voted for the war also. But he could not bring himself to accept that Hillary Clinton voted along these same lines for the war also, based on bad intelligence.
This election was not only bought by Obama millions–Obama won the nomination of the Democratic party not by a campaign slogan called “change and hope” but in fact a campaign engineered by his strategist David Axelrod who set out to engage in race baiting to the highest level in a familiar style of Chicago politics.
Don’t be fooled; it’s not a “new style of politics” based on hope and change. It’s the race baiting machine at work with Axelrod at the helm. Something he has managed to do successfully in getting many a black politician elected–Harold Washington, Chicago’s first black mayor, Dennis Archer in Detroit, Michael White in Cleveland; Anthony Williams in Washington, D.C.; Lee Brown in Houston; and John Street in Philadelphia.
Tigre Hill’s 2003 documentary, The Shame of the City, explains exactly how Axelrod operates his smear tactics campaign and fan the flames of racial tensions in a behind-the-scenes role.
As a result of such a campaign, not only was a more qualified Senator Hillary Clinton denied her rightful nomination but a true war hero and well-respected Senator whose record proves his commitment to doing what is right, not simply what is politically expedient and who is clearly the best man for the job!

Posted by: Jane | October 19, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

ahhh i love……
joe “12 months ago i said barack obama wasnt ready to be the president, but now after a year on the campaign trail he is absolutely the man for the job” biden.
whew…. is that considered a run on sentence????

Posted by: tim | October 19, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Natasha, from the web site:
FactCheck.org’s staff, not the Annenberg Center, is responsible for this material.
Keep clinging dear.. it is indeed fun to correct your ‘facts’, although you have become quite repetitive lately!

Posted by: Janice | October 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Who are these paid bloggers writing these long dissertations? Are they being paid by the letter? Why is ABC allowing this crap? It smells a lot like fear. Somebody has moved the cheese! Change: One of life’s few constants!!

Posted by: dmac1 | October 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Powell DID NOT want to go to war with Iraq. He told the President not to do it. Vheney and Rumsfeld are the one’s who convinced Bush. This is documented.
McCain was the one, via his vote, that sent Powell to the UN. McCain gave Bush the power to start a war.
And the “intelligence” Powell presented to the UN had intentionally been cherry picked by Cheney and Rumsfeld to justify taking us to war.
When Powell found out about the lack of credibility in the intelligence information, and how it was obtained, he quit.
Pubs can try and discredit him all they want. Independent voters ARE listening to him.
The only question now is will Obama win big or will it be a landslide!

Posted by: Cheese with Your Whine? | October 19, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

It is so sad to see so many especially young people being fooled by the Republican party. Repeating the lines being fed without acquiring the critical learning skill that is so vital to success in life.
The current Republican party is not the party I joined over 30 years ago. It has turned into a power grabbing, greedy, unethical and narrow minded organization. The benefactors are the rich and large corporations. It used Christian moral value only as a facade to control the trusting moral people for the party’s agenda. It took the last 8 Bush years to finally opened my eyes and see what this party is about. I’d venture most if not all of Wall Street CEOs are Republicans. The party’s economic policy has been benefiting the rich and marginalizing small business owners, middle and lower classes.
Many of the posts I read reaffirms the narrowness, divisiveness and hypocrisy of what GOP has become. I’m glad I switched out of this party beginning of this year.
If history is a guide, the current GOP will not survive the time. They are going to lose and lose big in this election.
I feel sorry for those republicans still blinded by the hypocrites in power in their party.

Posted by: educator | October 19, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

300 retired generals and admirals and 4 secretaries of state have endorsed Mr. Mccain …. secretaries of state that have endorsed mr. mccain are …kissinger/haig/eagleburger/shultz
obama 1 powell.

Posted by: northernlights | October 19, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

>> .John McCain was right about the surge
Really? Then someone should tell Congress to ignore what Patreaus and Ambassador Crocker told them, because they don’t seem to agree with McCain on that point!
Maybe John boy knows something nobody else does.. or maybe it’s just in his mind.

Posted by: Janice | October 19, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

im an independant, who sadly has to vote for mccain, and i will GUARANTEE you, this election will NOT be a landslide. it will still be a dead heat on election day. mark my words. if we have learned anything in the last year isnt it that we cant trust the media? they are making it seem like the election has already taken place.. lol

Posted by: tim | October 19, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I for one have been a Conservative Christian & Constitutional Republican; not to mention Candidate for Congress (’02 & ’04): and will submit to you that I, like Colin Powell, endorse and WILL vote for Barack Obama next month.
I am no “Moderate” Republican or “Progressive” Republican either !
My Uncle, Henry Cisneros (who’s on the Front Page of The New York Times Today), not only served as HUD Secretary in The Clinton Administration; but he tried to prepare U.S. Citizens for this Housing & Mortgage Banking Mess we face today.
And although he supported & voted for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic Primary; he unwaveringly NOW supports &
will Deliver Barack Obama the Hispanic Vote in Texas & Throughout The U.S.A.
I endorse, support & WILL Vote for Barack Obama; NOT because I’m a “Liberal”, “Socialist” or God-forbid “Communist” (on the Contrary; I’m probably The Most Conservative, Capitalist & Free Enterprising person on The Face of This Earth–Let alone The U.S.A.: But because we CAN NOT Continue with the Policies of The Bush I, II or III (aka McCain) and REMAIN a FREE & PROSPEROUS NATION !
Truthfully Submitted,
Tony Cisneros
2002/2004 Candidate For Congress,
United States House of Representatives,
4th Congressional District,
State of Illinois,
Republican.
Website: http://www.lopez-cisnerosin2002.0catch.com
E-mail: tonyin2002@hotmail.com

Posted by: Tony Cisneros | October 19, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

8 more year! 8 was not enough! We want MORE! Vote Republican! 8 more years!
Seriously, 8 years of Republicans in the White House was enough . .. its the Democrats’ turn – and by the way the Democrats are not demons despite what the nutjob right might say. Many Republicans will be voting Democrat this time – enough is enough.

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

let me just pose a question to everyone in here: seeing that the media has already made up its mind on who is going to win, can you imagine the outcry if mccain actual wins on nov. 4th??!! think about it for a second. it will be like the first o.j. simpson trial, and the 2000 election wrapped in one!!!! absolute chaos….

Posted by: tim | October 19, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Considering the Fact that
Colin Powell was the face of the
Bush Administration from 2001-2005 I fail to see how this late in the game endorsement helps Obama!
Obama’s main claim to fame is that he
opposed the war in Iraq from the
Gitgo!
Powell on the other hand made the Bush
Administrations case on Iraq’s WMD to
the U.N. and the United Nations!
He fully supported the decision to
invade Iraq and to this day has not made any criticism of that decision!
This is akin to President Bush
endorsing Obama!
How do the antiwar Democrats
reconcile this?
Powell offers scant explanations for
his endorsement!
As has been the case for most of the Obama campaign this appears to be
a decision made on race and race alone!
I have lost all of the respect that
I had for Powell as a result of this
ludicrous endorsement!
Shame on you Colin Powell!
It won’t work! Mr redistribution of the
wealth, Barack Obama is going down!

Posted by: reaganfan | October 19, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

400 retired generals and admirals have endorsed mr. mccain
4 secretaires of state have endorsed mccain.
1-powell has endorsed obama

Posted by: northernlights | October 19, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

pefros…
usually i might be able to agree with you, but obama, pelosi, and reid as the nations leaders??!!! they ARE the left wing nuts that normal americans refer to in the democratic party. idealists, not leaders.

Posted by: tim | October 19, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

reaganfan…
oh cmon, it dosent matter WHO comes out and throws their support behind him, the left will glorify it. colin powell, like you said , was a major face in the “evil” bush administration. right in the middle of the iraq war decisions. but now, they forgot how they dragged him through the mud not so long ago. to them its “see, even you’re own party is abandoning you’re canidate”. so its not a matter of WHO it is, or WHY they are endorsing him, its just that they are endorsing him. its pointless.

Posted by: tim | October 19, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

gmarie: read more carefully–the person who is a pompous ass was attempting to ‘tutor’ me in world economics, and took my name and used it as the first part of his own. oh, and in addition to being a pompous ass and brainwashed by the right wing as to how economies work, he also can’t use the correct form of the homophone ‘to’…

Posted by: antijake | October 19, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

The part I find most interesting is Biden in the Pacific northwest. Why?

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Southern Hospitality–
Why do you think bad manners are a good thing?
I despise W. and think he was the worst president in history. However, I thought it was rude and unacceptable when W.was booed at a ball game.
I hope you teach your children better manners than that.

Posted by: Confused | October 19, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

omg. this is funny. wishful thinking, joey boy.

Posted by: Kitty | October 19, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Powell Endorsement might turn out more harm than good for Obama because Powell also is black. He should keep quiet. Just my thought.

Posted by: stock_craft | October 19, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Please watch the video of Rep. Michele Bachmann (MN) on HARDBALL!
She EXEMPLIFIES the voice of the current GOP and the McPalin campaign. She exibits why we CANNOT support the Republican party!
Even discounting all her rediculous assertions, this woman goes on to suggest investigations should be done about Congressmen that are “Anti-American”. (Meaning anyone who disagrees with her self-rightious values)
This type of talk is straight from the Sen. McCarty catalog. It comes straight from the top of the ticket, inspired by McCain and Palin. Just google “McCarthy hearings 1954″ and compare it.
I was so disgusted, I actually sent $50 to her opponent, El Tinklenberg, and I live in VA. From what I’ve heard, I wasn’t the only one.
SERIOUSLY, please check it out! We cannot allow these facist A-holes to take our government from us!

Posted by: "Have you no sense of decency left?" | October 19, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

I so look forward to 11/5.
McCain is a tool and Palin is a pile of steaming moose poo.
They cannot exit the stage soon enough.

Posted by: ITS ALMOST OVER | October 19, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

I know it’s hard for some of you. But the time has come. For others the time has gone. That’s right it’s about time.
OBAMA TIME, get used to it. Be proud of it. History is being made. Revel in it. Don’t fight it. Embrace it. Ypur’e living in a historical time. Be thankfull.
Praise Jesus

Posted by: Troy | October 19, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

tim – I think you’re over-complicating the significance of this decision by Powell. He was a Republican secretary of state who endorsed the Democrat nominee.
I believe that’s the first cross-over endorsement from past secretaries of state.
Plus, you can add to that Powell’s stature. He is the guy the Republicans would have loved to run in 1996 or 2000.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Tim,
The media has been trying to tone down the idea of a landslide. You can’t turn on the tube without hearing what a racist bunch the Americans are and how that darn “Bradley” effect will destroy Obama. The media is pushing hard for McCain to win.
If they were being honest, they would have called it last week.
It isn’t going to be anywhere close to close. Keep on dreaming, you have two more weeks to live in your fantasy land.

Posted by: ITS ALMOST OVER | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

“…Oh yea one other thing, if big major corps. make less profits, what investor will want to invest their monies into major corp. when the profits are only 5% and the investor is only making 2% on the return of their money? I hope you think about this before you vote….”
Posted by: 55Mariposa
————————————-
2% return and on top of that the racing inflation!
Another thing that the left-wing-liberals are so happy about is that Marxist Obama will impose higher taxes for example on the Oil Companies – Exxon Mobil etc. Well, what the liberal morons do not understand is that Exxon Mobil and the other Oil companies will pass the cost of the higher taxes right back to every single one of us – at the pump!
Or do the liberals think that if Obama starts taxing more the big corporations those companies will not respond with lay-offs or packing theit bags and set up shop in another country?
That is why communism failed -because morons around the world like our left-wing-liberals here worshiped once some other “Messiahs”! When they realized the travesty of communism then it was too late.
Americans- think before you vote. Do NOT let Marxist Obama destroy our country with his… “USA: The New Communist Experiment”

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I thought having joe the senator on the ticket was supposed to ease our minds about obama. isn’t it hilarious that joey is now having to boast about powell? funny. just.too.funny.

Posted by: Kitty | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

At a time like this – 2 wars, economy in chaos, housing and energy crisis, can we afford an America being in the hands of the EXTREME LEFT ? Can we have an America in the full control of OBAMA, PELOSI AND REID? Can we afford an America with NO CHECKS and BALANCES .. Can we afford an America where the EXTREME LEFT can run with their most EXTREME LEFT AGENDA?
America, We dont care what you are … it does not matter if you are Republican, Democrat, Independent, black, white, brown, yellow, orange, green, bald or a head full of hair, tall or short, educated or not … We need to come together for sake of COUNTRY AND COUNTRY ALONE.
WE CANNOT AFFORD AN AMERICA RUN BY OBAMA, PELOSI AND REID … WE CANNOT AFFORD AN AMERICA WITH OBAMA AS PRESIDENT AND DEMOCRATS IN CONTROL OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE ESPECIALLY WHEN OBAMA IS THE MOST LIBERAL SENATOR WITH SUCH QUESTIONABLE ASSOCIATIONS WITH THE REV. WRIGHT, AYERS AND ACORN. THE LIST GOES ON .. AND IF THE LIST IS THAT LONG, IT IS NOT COINCIDENTAL.
AMERICA, WHEN IN DOUBT, VOTE ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION – VOTE COUNTRY FIRST .. VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN. …
THE ALTERNATIVE IS A COUNTRY RUN BY OBAMA, PELOSI AND REID …
THAT IS A COUNTRY WHERE THERE IS NO BALANCE IN GOVERNMENT … THAT IS A COUNTRY THROWN TO THE MOST EXTREME LIBERAL LEFT … THAT IS THE COUNTRY WE ALL CANNOT AFFORD TO HAVE.
THANKS … AND PLEASE THINK THROUGH CAREFULLY WHEN YOU HAVE TO CAST YOUR VOTE. THAT IS ALL I ASK.

Posted by: BE WISE AMERICA | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I GUESS THE ARGUMENT IS THAT POWELL IS READY AND OBAMA ISNT.. HOWEVER, OBAMA INHERITED READINESS FROM POWELL.
WOW!
REALLY LOGICAL
BLACK MAN STABS HIS LONGTIME FRIEND MCCAIN, AND ENDORSES ANOTHER BLACK MAN
POWELL DID OBAMA A GREAT DISSERVICE BECAUSE, BLACK ARE CLOGGING TOGETHER IN THE CLASS WAR OBAMA IS SETTING UP
WHITES WILL BIND TOGETHER TOO
WHAT THE HECK
RACISM IS GOOD FOR BLACK, IT MUST BE GOOD FOR WHITES.

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Hey Paul,
Have you punched any frogs lately to see how far they will jump?

Posted by: ITS ALMOST OVER | October 19, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

BAROCK the Vote. It’s up to you young people. The old folks don’t get it. It’s you’re time now. Don’t let us down

Posted by: Troy | October 19, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Be Wise America–
Choosing wise is not choosing Palin. She is a total doof and not fit to even visit the white house on a tour.
She drove me to vote for McCain.

Posted by: No Palin | October 19, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

You know, that’s probably the best answer to this bizarre notion that Powell only supports Obama because they’re both black.
If Powell really just wanted a black president, he would already have been that president.
We all know he could have entered either the 1996 or the 2000 campaign as the frontrunner not only for the GOP nomination but for the general election.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Natasha–
Boris is calling for you, time to hunt some moose.

Posted by: No Palin | October 19, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Lol, at the Rocky and Bullwinkle reference.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Seriously, 8 years of Republicans in the White House was enough . .. its the Democrats’ turn – and by the way the Democrats are not demons despite what the nutjob right might say. Many Republicans will be voting Democrat this time – enough is enough.
Trying to demonize the Democrats is the last gasp of the nutcases of the right.
It’s the Democrats turn. 8 years of the Republicans was enough.

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

TJ, THE CLINTONITE | Oct 19, 2008 10:49:47 PM,
You disgrace white people with your filth and bigotry. Go practice goose-stepping, Fascist

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Reading the posts, you can just sense the desperation of Pub supporters.
McCain and Palin have hit the iceberg and the ship is going down.
Pretty pathetic when McCain won’t even say Palin is qualified. All he can say is “he’s proud of her”.
I was proud of my daughter when she did her first play in 2nd grade. Not the most convincing endorsement for the credibility of your Vice Presidential running mate.
Rather than trying to smear everyone’s character, next time why not just get some decent candidates?
You don’t have to decide right now, you have at least four years to think about it.

Posted by: Capt McCain and his Talking Parrot | October 19, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Reading the posts, you can just sense the desperation of Pub supporters.
McCain and Palin have hit the iceberg and the ship is going down.
Pretty pathetic when McCain won’t even say Palin is qualified. All he can say is “he’s proud of her”.
I was proud of my daughter when she did her first play in 2nd grade. Not the most convincing endorsement for the credibility of your Vice Presidential running mate.
Rather than trying to smear everyone’s character, next time why not just get some decent candidates?
You don’t have to decide right now, you have at least four years to think about it.

Posted by: Capt McCain and his Talking Parrot | October 19, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

@reaganfan:
Ronald Reagan Jr. on his mother, Former First Lady Nancy Reagan:
“I can tell you though that she’s also very impressed with Barack Obama…she’s just impressed by his demeanor, is not just that he’s an eloquent guy and a guy who gives a good speech, a lot of people said that about my father too. But she sees through that. She’s been around a long time and she looks at Barack Obama and she sees the words, hears the words and she perceives character there. She thinks this is a good guy, a guy who means well and is a strong character.”
On McCain’s VP pick:
“Sarah Palin is in no way qualified to be vice president or certainly president. John McCain is a 72 year old cancer survivor, not just any cancer, melanoma. Not just any melanoma, melanoma above the neck. It was his obligation to choose somebody who could realistically step into the big chair and Sarah Palin is not that person.”

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 19, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

tiff / Oct 19,2008 8:47:32 PM
“DIANA,IT IS SO CLEAR TO SEE THAT YOU ARE A RACIST MEAN SPIRITED PERSON. I BET YOU ONLY HAVE A GED? OR MAYBE NOT”
For your information, I’m a Hispanic military retiree, have a college education, own a beautiful 2000+ s.f. house, have a very generous savings account for civilian retirement, travel to Europe twice a year, and earn a very good salary as a federal employee, and I’m not waiting for the government to sort out my life like most of Barack Hussein Obama’s supporters. You must be supporting Obama because of his race and color, waiting for a handout, want the taxpayers to pay for your abortions because you can’t keep your legs closed or perhaps you’re on the other team, you’re GAY, and an Obama cult follower who calls herself Christian like Obama. And you’re from the party of hope, unity, change who is going to heal the sick and unite the world because Obama the messiah said so!

Posted by: Diana in California | October 19, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Seriously, though, why was Biden in the northwest? Almost makes you think the Obama camp is looking at some slippage in the numbers there.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Paul,
Biden had over 11,000 people turn out for him. That’s more than any McCain/Palin rally–even if when you count Obama supporters who showed up to protest it

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

The Republicans have already been busy redistributing the wealth for the past 8 years.
They’ve been helping redistribute money from the lower and middle income groups to the top 5% of the rich.
8 years of Republicans in the White House and 6 in congress and senate lining their pockets, blowing the budget and generally just making a mess of stuff . . . guess what?

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Never ceases to amaze me how persons on both sides try to out-sleze each other in spewing vitriol!

Posted by: Rue | October 19, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

– Page 6 of the report. “Provision for income taxes: 2008 = $2.2 billion ; 2007 $2.1 billion –
Cisco:
Page 8: Actual income taxes: $107,000,000
This on a company whos net income was $10,255,000,000 or about 1% of net income.
Microsoft:
Page 42: Actual income taxes:
$3,248,000,000 on a net income of $17,681,000,000
better, about 18%, but still nowhere near the 35% corporate tax rate as specified by the IRS.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

I do know this, though. The map is shaping up into one in which McCain has to run the table on battleground states.
And I’m not sure if he’s leading right nnow in a single one of them. What’s more, he’s got significant hills to climb in several – like Virginia, where a couple of polls are putting the Obama lead at double digits.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

antijake – my sincere apologies. I read too quickly and became hot under the collar with the rude and condescending tone this other person was taking with you! Usually, I have much better manners. =)

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

By the way, Powell’s comments on the despicable nature of the McCain campaign were bang on the mark, and withering. What a bunch of sleazy tactics.

Posted by: pefros | October 19, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

If Obama wins Viginia, game over. We will probably know who is president by 9 p.m. Eastern Time.
The networks are already freaking out about how to fill the time.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Has Joe Biden – the Talking Parrot – seen this?
ABC News Video: OBAMA OUT OF TUNE?
Obama: No Hand on Heart for National Anthem
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=3759803

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Neocon=Fascist – okay, and that’s cool. Well, its not completely accurate, as McCain-Palin have had a couple turn-outs larger than 11,000. The crowds were over-estimated by the campaign, but even the fire marshall and local police counts for a couple showed numbers above 11,000.
But still, for a veep candidate by himself, 11,000 is impressive.
But why there? It wouldn’t seem to make sense. If you’re going to fly Biden west, why not send him to Nevada or New Mexico instead, where Obama is leading but it is close enough the think McCain could still potentially win?

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Hearing Colin Powell, the moderate Republican, reject John McCain is like hearing the old John McCain reject the new John McCain.

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 19, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Natasha,
For God’s sake go find Bullwinkle, that story is about 8 months old.
You don’t have to put your hand on your heart for the Star Spangled Banner.
Get a life.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

to Obama;0experience;8 more years of Bush,
You have proved that you know how to cut and paste! Are there any OTHER blog sites you might have missed? Please go check and see. We’re all tired of you taking up so much useless space here.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 19, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Diana in California,
If you’re Hispanic, why do you go with the party, where Tancredo, Romney and Guiliani destroyed each other by trying to prove who hated Mexican immigrants the most?
It’s your choice, but if you’ve read these posts, you might be aware that there are a lot of white supremacists on here. They telegraph their punches. You don’t think they’ll take exception to you at some point?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

The old John McCain would reject the new John McCain.
How’d he get here?????

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

“…Obama’s national healthcare program is crap. There is not sufficient tax money to pay for most of Obama’s pipe dreams that he calls programs. I guess the government must start printing worthless money again….”
Posted by BlackJack
————————————
BlackJack- Obama’s “Nationalized Medicine” plan is a LEMON!
Obama and those who support his “Nationalized Medicine” plan can get the heck out of the US and move to Cuba or North Korea!
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/gop-senator-sla.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Paul,
The polls in Washington have been tight for weeks now. Palin helped McCain up there, there are a ton of Alaskans living in the Seattle/Tacoma area.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Natasha—
Go check your e-mail, your talking points are so 5 minutes ago.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I know someone who’s volunteering there. They’ve registered a lot of new voters. I gathered from what she said that it was a way of saying “thanks for a job well done.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

– Obama and those who support his “Nationalized Medicine” plan can get the heck out of the US and move to Cuba or North Korea! –
Anyone who calls obamas plan “nationalized medicine” just shows they have no clue.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I used to buy into that ‘old McCain, new McCain’ notion.
But then I started asking myself what I really knew about the old McCain.
He’s always said quirky things. So that’s not different.
Has he always told the truth? Well, he says ‘no.’ In 2000, he said he was running for president to bring straight talk to Washington. But then in 2002, he wrote a book in which he admitted that the 2000 campaign was just about his personal ambition – a long-held ambition just to be president.
Maybe the John McCain we see today is the same guy we’ve seen all along. Its just that we haven’t had a reason to focus on him so much, so we didn’t know a lot of these more troubling attributes?

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

As as republian I admire Collin Powell. I hate to say it hes right. McCain and Palin are a joke and I will not support this team. I will always be a republican but I will cross party this time and vote for Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Jamesc | October 19, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

The truth is there will be no change to health care under either McCain or Obama, why pretend. The money just is not there.
We are in for some seriously tough times regardless of who wins. I personally want cool, calm and steady over ill-tempered, erratic and twitchy.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Biden is a joke. He was one who questioned the prophet’s readiness. Now he said people should no longer question whether the empty suit is ready? Is he kidding? Somehow Powell’s endorsement is to silence the rest of Obama’s critic? I wonder if people recognize a pattern here. Shut up, shut up, shut up! Don’t question, listen and obey! Heil Obama!! Is this what we can expect? Fascist socialism from Obama and Biden?

Posted by: Gina | October 19, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I agree, I will also support Obama/Biden. Just becouse I am a register republican it does not mena I have to vote for the wrong folks!!! No PALIN..NO PALIN….WHAT A JOKE!!!!

Posted by: JESS | October 19, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Blackjack/Natasha
I love it when you GOP fascists agree with yourselves to make it seem like there’s more of you than there actually are. At the end of WWII only the Hilter Youth didn’t know that Germany was lost.
So good to see that their spirit for supporting the Fuhrer is alive and well in the one of you.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Facts: “The polls in Washington have been tight for weeks now…”
Didn’t know that. I thought the electoral maps had it safely blue.
Huh. Obama losing Washington would be as stunning as McCain losing Virginia.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Paul,
I have thought about that too. I slowly came to the realization that this McCain is the “real” McCain.
Once you hear his entire bio, you can see this is who he has always been.
The article in Rolling Stone was excellent.

Posted by: PALIN MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING | October 19, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

If Palin’s hate-filled inanities aren’t enough to turn you away then consider this:
“I have supported President Bush more than 90% of the time. That’s more than most of my Republican Colleagues.” – John McCain
‘Nuff said.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 19, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Natasha,
For God’s sake go find Bullwinkle, that story is about 8 months old.
You don’t have to put your hand on your heart for the Star Spangled Banner.
Get a life.
Posted by: Facts
———————————-
MICKEY MOUSE – STOP WRITING WITH 2 DOZEN DIFFERENT NAMES.
Whether you and That One like it or not, there are LOTS of things that are old but we will KEEP REMINDING PEOPLE ABOUT. Of course, you do not like it but I say…TOO BAD!
You get it, baby?
Go get a job Marxist Obama Operative.
Again, next time you decide on a diferent name make sure that you also change your IP address, BOZO!

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Paul,
I agree with you. This is the McCain of yesterday, today and always: a chump for corporations and the enemy of working people.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

As an OBAMA supporter; I say to the McCain supporters, let’s end this race on a respectful tone. Both sides need to bury the hatchet now. This race is over. No matter which way it goes, at this point, people minds are already made up. We all know who we are voting for. Some folks have already voted. Save your blogging energy for other subject. After 3 debates and endless news coverage, we all have come to closure with our decision. So, for the good of our country, stop acting like immature kids who hasn’t been properly raised and start respecting each other position. We can agree to disagree.

Posted by: The Truth | October 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

The New York Times trashes Obama’s Health Care Plan…
Health Plan From Obama Spurs Debate
By KEVIN SACK
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23health.html?_r=1&ref=policy&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
It is one of the most audacious promises in a campaign that has been thick with them.
In speech after speech, Senator Barack Obama has vowed that he will lower the country’s health care costs enough to “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.” Moreover, Mr. Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, has promised that his health plan will be in place “by the end of my first term as president of the United States.”
Whether Mr. Obama can deliver is a matter of considerable dispute among health analysts and economists. While there is consensus that the American health care system is bloated with waste, eliminating enough to save $2,500 per family would require simultaneous and synergistic solutions to a host of problems that have proved intractable for decades.
Even if the next president and Congress can muster the political will, analysts question whether significant savings would materialize in as little as four years, or even in 10. But as Mr. Obama confronts an electorate that is deeply unsettled by escalating health costs, he is offering a precise “chicken in every pot” guarantee based on numbers that are largely unknowable. Furthermore, it is not completely clear what he is promising.
His words about lowering “premiums” by $2,500 for the average family of four have been fairly consistent. But the health policy advisers who formulated the figure say it actually represents the average family’s share of savings not only in premiums paid by individuals, but also in premiums paid by employers and in tax-supported health programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
“What we’re trying to do,” said one of the advisers, David M. Cutler, in explaining the gap between Mr. Obama’s words and his intent, “is find a way to talk to people in a way they understand.”
The original arithmetic was somewhat basic. In May 2007, three Harvard professors who are unpaid advisers to the Obama campaign — Mr. Cutler, David Blumenthal and Jeffrey Liebman — produced a memorandum offering their “best guess” that a menu of changes would produce savings of at least $200 billion a year (it has since been revised to $214 billion). That would amount to about 8 percent of the $2.5 trillion in health care spending projected for 2009, when the next president takes office.
The memorandum attributed specific savings to several broad initiatives, with the numbers plucked from recent studies. Investments in computerized medical records would save $77 billion a year, the advisers wrote. Reducing administrative costs in the insurance industry would yield up to $46 billion. Improving prevention programs and chronic disease management would be worth $81 billion.
The total savings were then divided by the country’s population, multiplied for a family of four, and rounded down slightly to a number that was easy to grasp: $2,500. The average cost of family coverage bought through an employer was $12,106 in 2007, with workers paying $3,281 of that amount, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health research group.
Mr. Obama aspires to cover the country’s 47 million uninsured by requiring insurers to accept all comers, regardless of their health status, and by providing generous tax credits to low-income workers. The tax credits could be used to buy into a new federal health plan or private plans marketed through a government exchange.
The subsidies are expensive, estimated at well over $100 billion. Other components of the Obama plan also bear up-front costs, like a pledge to spend $50 billion over five years to speed the computerization of health records, $6 billion a year on tax credits to small businesses that provide coverage to workers, and an unspecified amount to buffer businesses from high-cost insurance claims.
The source Mr. Obama has identified to pay for them — the repeal of President Bush’s tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 — would cover only about half. That means additional health care savings would be needed, not only to keep premiums under control but also to help pay for the subsidies.
A consensus has emerged among health economists that at least a third of the country’s spending on health care is unnecessary. Both Mr. Obama, of Illinois, and his Republican rival, Senator John McCain of Arizona, agree that significant sums could be saved through reductions in unneeded procedures and improvements in electronic record-keeping, prevention and chronic disease management.
But the dollar values Mr. Obama has attached to individual components of his plan are beginning to attract scrutiny. In particular, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report in May questioning the amount to be saved from the computerization of health systems.
Mr. Obama took his estimate of $77 billion a year from a 2005 study by the RAND Corporation (which cautioned that reductions of that magnitude would not emerge for 15 years). The Congressional analysts found, however, that for various methodological reasons the RAND study was “not an appropriate guide” to potential savings.
This month, Mr. Obama’s health advisers tried to recast the debate so that the questioning of any one number would not undermine the plan’s broader credibility. They enlisted eight health policy experts to sign a letter that, without endorsing the math behind any single initiative, proclaimed it was “not only possible, but likely” that Mr. Obama could save $200 billion annually. They did not say by when.
Mr. Cutler, who helped collect the signatures, said he and his colleagues had decided “that our attempt to lay out one plausible scenario for the savings had created more problems than it had solved.” He added: “Putting the debate where this message puts it — do you believe we can save 8 percent of health spending through a major series of public and private reforms — asks the question in a way that is much more productive than the issue of ‘Do you believe a single estimate among many, many studies?’ ”
Mr. Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign’s estimates were conservative and asserted that much of the savings would come quickly. “We think we could get to $2,500 in savings by the end of the first term, or be very close to it,” Mr. Furman said.
The campaign won additional backing this week from Kenneth E. Thorpe of Emory University, an authority on health care costs who helped formulate Bill Clinton’s failed plan in 1993. In an assessment that he initiated in coordination with the campaign, Mr. Thorpe wrote that if all of Mr. Obama’s proposals were enacted they would reduce health spending by between $203 billion and $273 billion by 2012. He calculated that half of the savings would accrue to the federal government.
The Obama advisers said that while not all of the savings would translate into lower premiums, consumers would gain in other ways. The savings to employers would be passed along as higher wages, they predicted, and the savings to government would eventually mean either lower taxes or added benefits.
But whether employers and governments respond that way cannot be guaranteed, particularly in a difficult economy. And a number of health policy experts have questioned whether the $2,500 projection is either fiscally or politically realistic. Reducing health care costs, they emphasized, means taking money from someone’s pocket and rationing care that Americans have come to expect, a recipe for stiff resistance.
“There is no easy money because, as the saying goes, one person’s fraud and abuse is another person’s income,” said Joseph R. Antos of the American Enterprise Institute. “I wouldn’t think that four years or eight years or probably 10 years will be enough to see numbers of that sort.”
The Commonwealth Fund, a health research group in New York, published a study in December projecting that a robust overhaul consisting of 15 broad initiatives would generate savings of only 6 percent after 10 years. “Doing it by the end of a first term is ambitious and would require tough policies,” said Karen Davis, the group’s president.
Jonathan B. Oberlander, who teaches health policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, called it wishful thinking. “Do they have the potential to generate significant savings in the long run?” Dr. Oberlander asked. “Yes. Do I believe they will produce substantial savings in the short run that can be used to finance Obama’s plan? No.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23health.html?ref=policy&pagewanted=all

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

fun how obama is so far ahead that he needs an endorsement from the very guy who got us into Iraq in the first place
powell to get back at Bush falls right in
why does obams need this endorsement now?
to take the focus off his “joe the plumber’ socialistic fau paux
yup, he might as well showed up in a tank like Mike Dukakis
Hard working Americans don’t like government taking more, and they also don’t like a lofty liberal defacing one of their own (Joe the plumber)

Posted by: tom | October 19, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Paul,
I don’t think Obama will lose Washington or he would have gone himself. Biden’s trip is likely just to keep it the firmly in blue column.
The polls have tightened but I have lived in Washington and I really don’t see McCain taking it.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Natasha,
For God’s sake go find Bullwinkle, that story is about 8 months old.
You don’t have to put your hand on your heart for the Star Spangled Banner.
Get a life.
Posted by: Facts | Oct 19, 2008 11:09:23 PM
—————————————-
Natasha is the kind of dope that probably believes Bush and Cheney are patriotic just because they placed their hand over their hearts. However, given their policies a good case could be made that Bush and Cheney are heartless.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Who on earth will vote for McCain or fot that matter even worse Sarah palin.As a white male, republican I ask all my republicans friends, is Sarah Palin the best we can do???If you say yest you are in denial. Sarah Palin is the reason McCain will loose. McCain is looking week and I dont want this Sarah Palin or should I say Clueless Sarah becoming a president..Can you Imagine!!!! What a big joke. They only people that will not vote for Obama/Biden are Close minded and maybe racist. Obama is as white as hes black. The guy is ready and will be a great president.

Posted by: Jake TAYLOR | October 19, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Tom,
It is “fun” how Obama is so far ahead.
Good of you to admit it.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Natasha,
You can’t see anyone’s IP address–particularly not a dynamic IP. You’re not Big Brother, you’re just another KKK loser watching your party in its death throes. Go practice your Seig Heil and your Goose-stepping, your better yet, go take your meds. It’s probably time for you neocons to leave the day room anyway

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,OBAMA/BIDEN 2008,
A clear choice.

Posted by: Republicans for Obama | October 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Natasha-
Like you can find IP addresses, which you proved you cannot because I am not Mickey Mouse.
Trust me there are more than one of us who think you are a tool.
In fact, I suspect we are legion.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I was just going to ask if anyone had read the Rolling Stone article about McCain but saw it was already mentioned! When I read it, I lost the last shred of belief I had in his call to being a “maverick”. His actions have always been self-serving.

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Facts – I kind of have this idea that the so-called ‘safe’ states tend to fall the way everyone thought they would.
For instance, North Carolina is tied right now, but I’m guessing in the end, McCain will win it.
The situation in Virginia is different – kind of a case where for the state to switch its own colors, it has to do so by a lot.
So I’m guessing you’re right about Washington, too.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

jake taylor
it is fun, bad typo, because in reality the polls are way off and Obama knows this
and don’t even fully reflect his post debate / JTP crisis loses
we’ll see nov 4

Posted by: tom | October 19, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

The Boston Herald
October 11, 2008
It is what it is: Obama allied with scoundrels
In the best tradition of Bill Clinton’s declaration that the answer to the question of whether he was having an affair depended on “what the definition of is is,” Sen. Barack Obama was clearly concealing the truth when he said that William Ayers was “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood.”
The Ayers-Obama connection was, in fact, an intimate collaboration that it led to the only executive or administrative experience in Obama’s life.
After Walter Annenberg’s foundation offered several hundred million dollars to American public schools in the mid-’90s, Ayers applied for $50 million for Chicago. His purpose was to “raise political consciousness” in schools.
After he won the grant, Ayers’ group chose Obama to distribute the $50 million, and the future senator raised another $60 million from other civic groups to augment it. In doing so, he was following Ayers’ admonition to grant the funds to “external” organizations, like American Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), to pair with schools and conduct programs to radicalize and politicize the students.
Reading, math and science achievement tests counted for little in the grants, but the school’s success in preaching a radical agenda determined how much money it got.
Obama should have run screaming at the sight of Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers has admitted bombing the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon, and his wife was imprisoned for failing to cooperate in solving the robbery of a Brink’s car in which two police were killed. Far from remorse, Ayers told The New York Times [NYT], in September 2001, that he wished he “could have done more.” Ayers only avoided conviction when the evidence against him turned out to be contained in illegal wiretaps. He was, in fact, guilty as sin.
So let’s sum up Obama’s Chicago connections. His chief financial supporter was Tony Rezko, now on his way to prison. His spiritual adviser was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, of “God damn America” fame. And the guy who got him his only administrative job is former terrorist Ayers.
Not a good recommendation for a president.
© The Boston Herald and Herald Media.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1124922

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Paul,
I completely agree. I think Virginia may fall for Obama, but I don’t see any others that were red going that way. I would love to be surprised.
I want Ohio to go blue but I have a pretty queasy feeling. When people in Ohio or hanging Obama in effigy, I question the state will go for him.
The consensus is that Obama is almost guaranteed to win the popular vote but does not have a lock on the electoral college.
The entire west coast will remain blue.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Tom,
Your party is too stupid to steal this election. But keep threatening to: It’ll be be on the prosecution docket when you KKKers are indicted.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

tom: “because in reality the polls are way off…”
I’m not saying they couldn’t be, but I don’t see how you can claim to know what’s really happening in terms of the support each campaign has if not by the polls.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Tom,
McCains internal polls are leaking out and they don’t look good.
He is in deep trouble. He is unlikely to pick off a single state that Kerry won, so he has to keep all the states Bush won.
Virginia is looking to fall and so is Florida, Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico too. If just one of these go to Obama, McCain CANNOT win.
So you may want to take a math class and buy a box of tissue.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

The significance in Powells endorsement is that it shows how, regardless of party affiliation, people are realizing that Obama is the best candidate for turning this country in the right direction, and are willing to break party lines to do what is best for America and it’s citizens.
For an example of how historic this election has become, the Chicago Tribune has officially endorsed Obama. Some may say, “chicago! no wonder”! But consider this, the Chicago Tribune has never, let me repeat that, NEVER in it’s 136 year history endorsed a Democratic presidential candidate. The Tribune’s first great leader, Joseph Medill, was a founder of the GOP. The editorial page has been a proponent of conservative principles. It believes that government has to serve people honestly and efficiently.
Why have they decided to endorse Obama?
“On Nov. 4 we’re going to elect a president to lead us through a perilous time and restore in us a common sense of national purpose.
The strongest candidate to do that is Sen. Barack Obama. The Tribune is proud to endorse him today for president of the United States.”
And they give many, many more rational and considered reasons in their endorsement article. This is truly a historic election, and all should be proud to be able to participate in it.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-chicago-tribune-endorsement,0,1371034.story

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Natasha,
It’s called Op-ed, because it’s someone’s opinion. Here’s something that isn’t: Palin addressed the Alaska Independence Party this year. You know, the militant fringe that was tied to the Oklahoma city bombing of 1995?
Me thinks that you and Palin doth protest too much.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Concerned in America–
I am too lazy to post the long ones, thanks for countering Natasha the Dummy

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Natasha, Natasha, give it up! You people have had your chance. Move over so that the Obama administration can clean up the mess you’ve all left, AGAIN!

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

“His actions have always been self-serving.”
What do you expect from the son of an admiral and the grandson of an admiral? His upbringing on naval bases around the world taught him to believe he was better than everyone else! He has been used to unquestioned deference and obedience his entire life! Why do you think he gets so twitchy if anyone DARES question him?
If you had ever served on a military base, you would know that.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 19, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

McCain is a creepy old dude. I wouldn’t trust him with the keys to my car, why on earth would I trust him with the keys to my future.

Posted by: Twitchy McCain | October 19, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

do tell why being a republican makes one a KKK member?
who is trying to steal this election?
can you say Acorn boy’s and girls?
show me a qualified canidate
I look at their record, their character and not the color of their skin
so will the average voter
who didn’t drink the koolaid
Not only will Mccain win nearly all the red states, he will take Pennsylvania outright
sorry – hard working people don’t buy the socialist in hiding canidate

Posted by: tom | October 19, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

It’s Palin-Doody time,
What will the little puppet be saying on the stump tomorrow?
She can’t bring up domestic terrorism anymore cuz her husband is a domestic terrorist.
She can’t talk about foreign policy, cuz she seems to agree with Obama more than McCain on that subject.
She can’t talk about the economy cuz she is too stupid to understand it.
Hmmmm….what will it be.

Posted by: Palin-doddy | October 19, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

NV-Sparkle – McCain does smack of Navy elitism. As a retired Marine officer, I can tell you from what I’ve seen, Navy officers are far more elitist than those from other Services. And McCain strikes me as being a perfect fit in that culture.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

– who is trying to steal this election?
can you say Acorn boy’s and girls? –
It is unfortunate that you have bought the fear and ignorance card hook line and sinker.
– I look at their record, their character and not the color of their skin –
Obviously not each candidates platforms, or how they will direct the future of our country.
– sorry – hard working people don’t buy the socialist in hiding canidate –
Ahh, the ‘socialist’ sound bite.. never mind, you are already too far gone.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Tom–
Acorn was a bunch of lazy minimum wage workers who had quotas to fill and so filled out phony registration forms.
Do you really think Mickey Mouse was going to show up to vote at the polls?
Besides ACORN turned the info in, in the first place.
You can’t have voter fraud when not one of these people voted, cuz they weren’t real.
Acorn is a non-issue.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

And to all of you who are so afraid of Obama’s “socialist redistribution of wealth”, who say he will tax us all to give to whomever, what do you call it when $700 billion is taken from the taxpayers to give to Wall Street? Hmmm?
Just asking.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 19, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Tom–
PS…McCain has to win ALL the red states. He can’t lose even ONE.
He won’t win Pennsylvania. Obama is up by 12. Keep on hoping racism will rear its ugly head but it ain’t going to happen.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Tom,
You are delusional. And I say that you’re a KKKer because only the most fringe elements of the Republican party haven’t run screaming from it. You would know that if you were literate.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Voters the Polls Neglected: All Military Branches Strongly Support McCain
http://www.militarytimes.com/static/projects/pages/081003_ep_2pp.pdf
Posted by: LightSeeker
————————————
This is a must watch for all patriotic -morally sound American fellows.
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
AMERICA SAY NO TO OBAMA’S…
“USA: THE NEW COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Natasha–
For every poll you have, we have one too.
The military vote is not in the bag for McCain. After all he received a grade of D by one of the vet organizations. He was against Sen. Webb’s GI bill, that hurt him.

Posted by: Facts | October 19, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I hear that the second investigation is going well for Governor Palin. They still haven’t found out about the Governor’s affair with her female secretary.

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 19, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

There is a lot of talk about impeaching Gov. Palin in Alaska.
Her future ain’t looking to bright. I hope she enjoyed her 15 minutes of fame.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

McCain will carry nearly all the Bush states, except Iowa (where he talks honestly why Etahnol subsidies are wrong) and possibly Colorado or New Mexico
do the math yourself at Real Clear Politics, he takes Penn it’s over
why will that happen
Hillary Puma’s, racist comments on W. Penn voters, Obama’s guns and religion comment and joe the plumber
you dems can feel smug all you want,
but Obama loses the electorial college
despite all his Acorn efforts

Posted by: tom | October 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Tom,
He has to take Florida too in your scenario. That is not a foregone conclusion. The Gov of Florida dissed McCain just this week.
What about Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada??? Are you saying he can afford to lose all of those?

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Natasha,
The IVAW did an expose on that poll last week. It was fiction, start to finish.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

To Paul,
All I can say to you is “Semper Fi”!
Thank you for serving your country. I, too, served in the Corps! As did my mother and father before me. We all know elitist BS when we see it, don’t we?
Time to restore our preeminance in the world. No more failed Bush policies. No McCain/Palin!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 19, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/obamas_a_socialist_woman_shout.html
WEL, WELL BARRY! IT LOOKS LIKE MONEY CAN’T BUY YOU LOVE IN NC..HAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Posted by: southern hospitality | Oct 19, 2008 8:15:04 PM
———————–
If you’re looking for a McCain endorsement, get comfy. You’ll be waiting for a while.

Posted by: Ggii | October 19, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

– I am too lazy to post the long ones, thanks for countering Natasha the Dummy –
Funny part was that it wasn’t in response to Natasha.. I think most have already learned to ignore her, and her obnoxious cut-n-paste habit, and simply skip over whatever she happens to be spouting about that particular moment. Heck, she isn’t even a citizen, just a Russian trying to get Palin out of Alaska so nobody will be there to keep an eye on their planes, leaving it open and ripe for attack.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Tampa Bay beat the Red Sox- woo hoo.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

If I may make a small suggestion to the administrator here (and apologies if someone has beaten me to it):
A “report abuse” button accompanying posts might be useful in the way of minimizing the keyboard diarrhea evidenced by a single user here.
And to that user:
If all your candidate has left for argument is robo-calls, copy-and-paste, and “Look at the scary Negro!,” maybe it’s time you packed it in and left the discussion to the adults.
Thanks!
Mike

Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Tom,
If Obama takes Nevada, New Mexico and Colorado he can afford to lose Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida.
He is not going to lose all three of those.
McCain can’t win.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Palin, Yuck
Tom is subscribing to Giuliani’s Plan: do nothing and wait for them in Florida: We’ve got them right where we want them.
Famous last words of Johnny “Crash” McCane

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

– who is trying to steal this election?
can you say Acorn boy’s and girls? –
Tom, why do you people INSIST on being obtuse? Voter registration fraud does NOT equal voting fraud!!! Just because some goofy, minimum age-earning employees turned in fictitious cards does NOT mean that those fictitious people are going to show up to vote. The Repubs gripe about this same thing every election WHILE they are out trying to suppress the vote by coming up with inventive ways to keep folks from being able to vote!! Again, you repubs amaze me with your duplicitousness.

Posted by: gmarie | October 19, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Tom–
Hello, Tom are you there? Tom?

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

GOD BLESS AMERICA!
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
AMERICA SAY NO TO OBAMA’S…
“USA: THE NEW COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 19, 2008 11:43:51 PM
=================================
THE SKY IS FALLING!
THE SKY IS FALLING!
FEAR FEAR FEAR! FEAAAR THE BOOOOGEY MAN!!!! TERROR! DO YOU FEEL IT? DO YOU????
ARE YOU AFRAID?????
be afraid. be very afraid. McCain/Palin!
Im John McCain and I approve this terrorist message.

Posted by: John McCain | October 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Where have all the Republicans gone. Where or where could they be? Crying in their budweiser?
Have the big bad Dems really scared them away. Awwwww.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

At a time that Europe is awakening up – turning to the “right” after years of “failed socialism” it would be a crime to elect Marxist Obama as the next President of the United States of America.
Even France learned the lessons of its “failed socialism” and elected conservative Nicholas Sarkozy – a staunch friend of the United States. And here we are – Americans are about to let our country destroyed by MARXIST BARACK OBAMA!
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
The following video is for the geopolitically savvy and morally sound AMERICAN PATRIOTS – not for the “OBAMA COMMUNIST YOUTH”!
France’s new leader Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech before Congress that was, dare I say, almost…Reaganesque. He called America “the greatest nation,” among other platitudes.
You can view the whole thing here, and I really think you should all watch it.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.
What’s particularly interesting is that, years ago when the Bush presidency was new and Iraq was a fresh issue, the left told us constantly that George Bush was making America less popular in the world. Yet during the President’s term in office three of our traditional allies (Canada, Germany and now France) elected leaders that displaced virulently anti-Bush and anti-American leaders with people more of Sarkozy’s temperament (Stephen Harper in Canada and Angela Merkel in Germany).
Sort of almost seems like…that whole “less popular America” thing just isn’t true.
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | October 19, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Tom, have you run away or just changed your name?
Are you there Tom, you cowardly KKK operative?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Natasha,
Do you even know anything about Marxism. It would appear not.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Republicans, come out to play….

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

– who is trying to steal this election?
can you say Acorn boy’s and girls? –
TOM? are you serious man???
LOL!!!!!! !
dude get some folic acid or somethin man!

Posted by: GIGI | October 19, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Neocon=Facist–
It appears we have scared them all away. Remember the good old days when republicans were a formidable opponent?
What a bunch of wussies.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 19, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

– you dems can feel smug all you want,
but Obama loses the electorial college –
Just looking at the strong (poll wise) states, Obama is leading in electorial votes 264 to 137 according to http://www.electoral-vote.com
But it’s never over until the fat lady sings in November.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 19, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Natasha,
Quit pluggin your blog. Those talking points are a month old. Try reading an international Magazine, like Der Spiegel:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,581502,00.html
If you inbred redneck bigots can read.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 19, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Electoral college–
I just went in and played with the map, Obama is in some seriously good shape.
McCain MUST WIN every single state Bush did plus, since he is losing Iowa.
If Obama plucks of even ONE state Bush one, McCain has no path to victory.
It can be Virginia, New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada or Florida— all of which Obama is currently ahead in.
I smell victory in a big way.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 20, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

America is divided
58% of Americans have conservative values. typically 40% go dem, 40% repub
and the undecideds win the election
Bush, who should have lost in 2004, didn’t, why? Americans couldn’t side with a liberal Kerry
Do I think McCain is the best republican for the job? no, but he certainly will be better for the country than the inexperienced and left associated Obama
when Americans go in the voting booth, those who are not already strongly polarized will ask themselves “can I really vote for this guy with no experience, radical ties, socialist programs?”
yes, it will be close and Obama may even get the popular vote, but the electorial college will split similar to 2004 and with a McCain grap in Pennsylvania, he can afford to lose Iowa and Colorado or New Mexico
Obama can’t close this deal
and remember he cheated by erasing others names off his first Ill senate campaign, worked the system to get HIllary’s votes not counted in FLA/MI and many offended democrats will help the republicans nominate MCCAIn
Obama’s Joe the Plumber moment gave plenty much to think about, it won’t be race, but character, that those wondering will decide when they can’t pull the lever for him come Nov 4
he hasn’t closen the deal despite all his money, flashy talk, etc and he just won’t

Posted by: tom | October 20, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Joe Biden – Go back to the Senate!
If you have the – you know what – be honest with the American people about Barack Obama – a MARXIST, who may end up becoming President of the United States of America.
Shame on you hypocrite Joe Biden!
Oh! I know…you would not know anything about “character” and “judgement” – after all you have already abandoned a Presidential bid because you were caught “plagiarizing”!
Perhaps you can abandon your Vice Presidential bid before the country BOOOOOS you for one more time – after Marxist Obama has destroyed it.
You should wash you mouth before speaking about Senator McCain.
Get lost Marxist DemocRATS!
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 18, 2008 7:39:32 PM
====================
lol this one goes around posting the same cut n paste lol! she’s such a follower of McCain that she’s doing the same thing he did with his acceptance speech! lol
and Like mccain, I’m sure she’ll find some do do head that’ll say “boy that’s a new stance new stump speech she’s got on today!” lol!

Posted by: GIGI | October 20, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Palin, Yuck,
I remember those days fondly. You had to be smart to argue with them. Not these hacks. The GOP, like the Nazis at the end of Hitler’s reign, send children to do the job of adults.
It’s a sad day.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Tom,
You have two weeks to live in your fantasy world.
Obama is seriously going to win. There are a lot of republicans and independents who just can’t bring themselves to vote for Palin.
If Palin was not on the ticket I think McCain would probably have won in the end. Seriously bad judgment on his part.
Spread the wealth is not going to sound like dirty words to a hard working blue collar guy who is about to lose his job. McCain is pro NAFTA, they don’t like that so much. McCain was against passing extended unemployment benefits. McCain is no friend to the working man and the working man isn’t as dumb as you hope he is.

Posted by: Palin, yuck | October 20, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

he hasn’t closen the deal despite all his money, flashy talk, etc and he just won’t
Posted by: tom | Oct 20, 2008 12:00:16 AM
==============
well tom, you know… he come grooving up slowly He got joo-joo eyeball
he one holy roller He got hair down to his knee.
Got to be a joker he just do what he please .
hum…
He wear no shoeshine he got toe-jam football. He got monkey finger he shoot coca-cola!
He say “I know you, you know me”
One thing I can tell you is you got to be free.
So… Come together right now over THAT ONE.

Posted by: GIGI | October 20, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Tom,
“Can’t close the deal” didn’t work for Clinton. It seems to be working less well for McCain. You GOP Wall Street bootlickers are such neophytes.
The problem is that you decided after GWBush that you didn’t have to bring your A-game.
Times have changed, Kiddies!

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Natasha,
Are you kidding me? You think that ONE official speech, made in the USA, really represents a change of sentiment among ALL European citizens? Do you think that when W speaks, his views represent the world’s populations? He doesn’t even represent the thinking portion of the US citizenry! Give us ALL a break! Get a passport, travel the world, talk with REAL people, and learn something! (Oh, and take Gov. Palin with you.)

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Tom–
Dude, really “closen the deal.”
Are you really Sarah Palin…hey everyone Sarah Palin is in the house tonight.
Let’s go nucular for her.

Posted by: English 101 | October 20, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

GIGI
Oh, SING IT!!

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

– will ask themselves “can I really vote for this guy with no experience, radical ties, socialist programs?” –
Naw, they will ask themselves, can I really vote for an old crank who would be a hair trigger away from the button and wants to continue us down the same rocky path we have been on for the last 8 years.
If Obama looked like JFK, this would not even be a contest. It’s the issues! It’s the economy! those who buy into the fear and ignorance tactics are the ones who got us here with Bush and the other numnut who claims the VP position is not part of the executive branch.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 20, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Palin, Yuck,
I remember those days fondly. You had to be smart to argue with them. Not these hacks. The GOP, like the Nazis at the end of Hitler’s reign, send children to do the job of adults.
It’s a sad day.
Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | Oct 20, 2008 12:02:16 AM
==============
YUP!
back when we was the ignorant, and they were the elite. When we had kids at 17 and they called us despicable, liberals and hippies…
back when they had educations, diplomas, degrees and all that jazz…
back when they had sky high holier than thou morals… HECK, BACK WHEN THEY DIDN’T WANT MCCAIN TO REPRESENT THEIR PARTY IN HIS RACE FOR PRESIDENT!
good times!

Posted by: GIGI | October 20, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

This is terrible.
It looks like the Republicans have lost the will to fight.
Two weeks to go and they have all but given up. Who could blame them, the writing has been on the wall for a long time but I guess with W’s No Child Left Behind none of them could read it.

Posted by: Awwwww | October 20, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Tom is getting his talking points from Pat Buchannan, a failed Presidential candidate a speechwriter.
Did you decide that Rush and George Will’s talking points weren’t working?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

- Bush, who should have lost in 2004, didn’t, why? -
FEAR, Tom, the politics of FEAR!!! NO MORE! Paul and NV-Sparkle serve our country as does my son. We’re not buying it anymore!

Posted by: gmarie | October 20, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

This presentation is a must watch for the left-wing-liberal media clowns and all “morally sound” American fellows.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Dear Awwwwww,
Getting them to lose the will to fight is the first goal. The second goal, after their illusion of a white America for whites only has ended, to get these racists to lose the will to LIVE.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Bush won because John Kerry was a terrible candidate. I had to hold my nose to vote for him. I will jump for joy into the booth to vote Obama.
Bush won because the economy was flying high and he told you we would all DIE if we elected the wussie Kerry.
Kerry did nothing to dispel the wussiness factor and he lost.
Obama isn’t Kerry, he fights back and the republicans just don’t know how to deal with a strong Dem.

Posted by: Indeed | October 20, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

GIGI
Oh, SING IT!!
Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | Oct 20, 2008 12:07:22 AM
============
gotta love my brit boys
=D
Tom is getting his talking points from Pat Buchannan, a failed Presidential candidate a speechwriter.
Did you decide that Rush and George Will’s talking points weren’t working?
Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | Oct 20, 2008 12:09:41 AM
=======================
or worse, mephistopheles’s waste himself. Mr. Karl Rove.
oy!

Posted by: Gigi | October 20, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

– AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE –
We are Natasha.. that is why McCain is so far down in the polls.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108043/Candidate-Support-Education.aspx

Posted by: Concerned American | October 20, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Natasha,
So socialism for Wall street = GOOD,
socialism for everyone else = BAD.
Do I have your maxim correct?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 12:12:04 AM
====================
I do love a good terror, er… I mean horror film! thanks!

Posted by: gigi | October 20, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I think therefore I am —- voting for Obama.

Posted by: Des Cartes | October 20, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Tom,
Hate to break it to you, but McCain won’t be nominated … you fools already did that! He won’t be ELECTED, either! He’s losing in ALL the states he needed to pick up. Give it up! It’s all over but the shouting … which you Repubs are VERY good at!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I think therefore I am —- voting for Obama.
Posted by: Des Cartes | Oct 20, 2008 12:14:37 AM
=========================
if it ain’t my next t-shirt! lol

Posted by: GIGI | October 20, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Hey Descartes,
If I say, “I think not!” Will I disappear?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I’m out… when a smart republican comes around, wake me up…
oh wait, lol!!!!
that was funnY!

Posted by: GIGI | October 20, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

sorry guys, I have to go to bed and work tommorrow
you’re canidate has the media in his back pocket, a huge cash drawer, eloquence but no experience, a record he can’t run from, and is hell bent on ruining this country
the average American’s can’t see all this, but then again they are not as dumb as Obama would like to portray them
that’s why he loses and he will lose
the dems have lost every time they play a leftist since Carter’s atrocity, and it will happen again this year
the media polls will not discourage the voters from getting out there
Bill CInton would have never insulted and smeared a “Joe the Plumber”, he was a centralist. Obama is too Ivory tower to see he has just alienated many hard working middle class workers
the country is polarized and Obama can’t win it on his platform, lack of experience and trust issues
Pennsylvania will be the winning state for McCain, and he holds Ohio and Florida too
286 mccain Obama 252
with him losing CO NM IA and gaining PA
and McCain may still get CO
just cause you don’t like it doesn’t mean it won’t happen

Posted by: tom | October 20, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The fact that Bush has turned out to be a liberal democrat when it comes to spending and Obama wants to continue these policies has been deflected. The cause of the economic meltdown was created largely from liberal congress members voting records and
Posted by: jamesferrel | Oct 19, 2008 8:18:08 PM
_______________________________________
Oh what a suprise jamesferrel is blaming even bush on the democrats. What’s the matter james couldn’t put this on Clinton? No I am afraid you self-denying losers that call yourself conservatives will have to suck this one up and admit what an incredible disaster the republican brand and your idiot boy bush has been to our great nation. I dare say just because you voted the traitor bush twice and haven’t the sense to change your behavior a third time the rest of this nation will not be so easily deceived.

Posted by: SeeingABetterWorld | October 20, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Neocon=Fascist–
Do you think we could get Palin to say that???? Wait, that wouldn’t work, she doesn’t think.

Posted by: Des Cartes | October 20, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Tom,
Did you disappear, or are the bathroom prowlers paying you by the word?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

David of Baltimore wrote:
“…Funny part is these Americans are already occupied blogging and attending the Obama pro-socialism rallies. Anyway if you really study this its the same idiots preaching the same smears and I really think nobody is really watching or reading besides us. How many time do you really see a reponse to your posts? Maybe its a bot the Obama people have running on their blog servers, that would explain why they are always off topic and never make sense.”
Posted by: David of Baltimore
———————————–
David…you hit the nail on the head!
Funny part the Obama trolls each posting with 24 different names – those Marxist (un)Americans – are already living off your taxes and my taxes, while they are busy 24/7 preaching about their “Chosen One” -”God’s Gift to America” per Bela Pelosi! Ahaha…ha!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Natasha,
The IVAW did an expose on that poll last week. It was fiction, start to finish.
Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | Oct 19, 2008 11:48:48 PM
—————————————-
Natasha is the kind of dope that believe voters should continue to support republicans even tho they ruined our great nation. She’s obviously comatose, dead from the neck up and so are her comments.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 20, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Natasha, are you that crazy McCain lady from the rally? I never read or watch anything suggested by someone who finds it necessary to incite hatred by using Barack Obama’s middle name just to make a lame NON point. Oh, and it’s Barack, not Barak. Learn to spell.

Posted by: gmarie | October 20, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Tom,
So you’re a prophet now?
You know, Mohammed was a Prophet.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I don’t understand how you can use someone’s middle name against them.
I mean my middle name is Milford, deeply embarrassing but it doesn’t define me.
How juvenile they are. I guess if you don’t have issues to run on, you reach for the inane.

Posted by: I am Hussein | October 20, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

– Obama is too Ivory tower to see he has just alienated many hard working middle class workers –
Oh, that is rich! The hard working middle class workers that will receive a larger tax break than they would under McCain.. The hard working middle class workers that will benefit from Obamas health plan instead of most likely losing it under McCain.. the hard working middle class workers who are struggling to pay for gas and higher cost goods because of it, which will see an immediate relief at the pump and market once Obama closes the enron loophole.. McCains vision of the hard working middle class is those who earn more than $100K, since those are the only ones who will get a tax break under his tax plan. Now, tell me again who has alienated the hard working middle class Americans?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 20, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Natasha,
You mean the dozen of us that are ganging up on you now, with 24 different names? The attacks are coming a little fast for that, don’t you think?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The Arabs and muslims have given much of their oil money to ensure an Obama win in this election.
Arabs and muslims or the liberal elite news media don’t influence this election.
Americans determine the outcome of this election and they have made their choice.
John McCain will be the next President.
GOD bless America.
Posted by: Demsnever
————————————
Perhaps this one is also sending LOTS of money to make sure “COMRADE OBAMA” is elected….
Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:
“Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi: Obama Suffers Inferiority Complex That Might Make Him Behave “Whiter Than the White.” He Should Be Proud of His African, Muslim Identity. Ben-Gurion Gave the Green Light for the Killing of JFK ….”
TEXT (Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008)
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1791.htm
VIDEO – Qadhafi: Obama is a Muslim – Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/gaddafi-obama-is-a-muslim/2563816338/?icid=VIDURVNWS07

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

natasha, i notice that you post an article from the nyt with a headline that asserts that the paper is ‘trashing’ obama’s health care plan. not at all. it was an analysis of whether or not the plan would be viable, and whether or not it could be achieved within the time-frame that sen. obama has indicated is his goal. the author of the piece has done similar articles comparing both health care plans.
you need to go a little beyond what the mccain camp sends you to disseminate as ‘talking points.

Posted by: antijake | October 20, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Sydney is a pretty wussy middle name.
I guess that proves McCain wasn’t a war hero. Makes you ponder all the special privileges he got in the Hanoi Hilton. I wonder if he was their little geisha.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

if you guys are so sure of yourselves why do you keep on insulting me?
your canidate can’t buy an election
even despite all his efforts
it may look all your way right now,
but it isn’t
I call them like I see them, sorry if you don’t like it
good night, sleep well

Posted by: tom | October 20, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Natasha,
As a lifetime Republican, I am on your side. I will not let these infidels speak to you so rudely.

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Barack Obama Couldn’t Pass a Routine Background Investigation
By Gregory D. Lee
Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent
October 10, 2008
A while back, radio talk show host Michael Savage brought up the notion that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama couldn’t pass a background investigation to become an FBI special agent.
He doesn’t know how right he is.
Sen. Barack Obama wouldn’t pass a routine government background investigation, not only to become an FBI agent, but a police officer as well. If he were a soldier, his background would preclude him from obtaining a security clearance. He wouldn’t even qualify to be a support person in a federal agency, such as secretary, for that matter. His past cocaine usage disqualifies him from being a DEA agent.
There’s another big problem Sen. Obama has: His association and business relationship with Weatherman Underground founder William Ayers, a former domestic terrorist who is still unrepentant for his bombings on U.S. landmarks and police stations. Usually, the company you keep reveals who you really are. Ayers felt then, as he does now, that America is the evil of the world and needs punishing for past and current bad acts. Not many federal agencies would want someone with that kind of chip on his shoulder working for it.
Also, Sen. Obama’s association with Tony Rezko and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) come to mind. Rezko was just convicted of promoting corruption among Chicago politicians. He helped in the purchase of the senator’s home and was a campaign fundraiser for Obama. ACORN is being investigated by the feds for systematic voter registration fraud. Not good things.
Let’s not forget about Sen. Obama’s pastor and mentor for 20 years, America-hater Rev. Jeremiah Wright. When first questioned about his membership in Wright’s black theology church, Sen. Obama first denied knowing Rev. Wright harbored such negative feelings about the U.S., but after being further pressed, he dismissed the reverend’s conduct as like a “crazy uncle” who lived in the basement. He finally decided that he couldn’t politically afford to stay in the church, and dropped his membership.
To keep job applicants honest, many government agencies such as DEA, FBI, CIA and others require them to take a polygraph examination. Do you think Sen. Obama could pass a polygraph when he approves an ad that mocks Sen. John McCain for being unable to send e-mails without mentioning his poorly mended broken arms while in custody of the North Vietnamese which prevents him from manipulating the computer keyboard? He’s not computer illiterate, he’s handicapped!
Would you want a police officer in your city associating with such people? Not likely. But Obama supporters ignore these associations because they are desperate for a Democrat in the White House.
A federal government full-field background investigation would also look for prior inconsistencies, exaggerations and outright lies on an application for employment.
I once conducted a background check for an applicant to become a secretary for DEA. She had previously worked for a large police department as a secretary, and left the job to have a child. She was ready to re-enter the workforce and wanted to work for DEA. She seemed perfect for the job until the background investigation revealed that she lied on her application. She claimed to have 30-semester hours of college in office management, when in reality she attended one day of one class and then dropped out. The fact that she lied was sufficient justification to consider her application no further. After all, if she would lie about that, what else has she lied about? Obviously the woman lacked integrity, which is a vital qualification for any position within the federal government, even a DEA secretary who would have access to all investigative reports.
I’d like to conduct Sen. Obama’s background investigation. I’d review his application for the Illinois state bar and see if he mentioned the drug usage that he disclosed in one of his books. If the question about drugs was asked, and he denied it at the time, his integrity is immediately put into question. He revealed it in his book to float a balloon to test his potential as a viable presidential candidate. Admitting it prevented his political opponents from attacking him about it. In fact, in the eyes of many Sen. Obama supporters, using drugs enhances his resume. It’s something they can relate to.
Personally I like my presidents to not associate with known criminals, be drug-free for a lifetime, have unquestioned integrity and be able to pass a simple background investigation.
Gregory D. Lee is a nationally syndicated columnist and a retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent. He can be reached at http://www.gregorydlee.com.
http://www.northstarwriters.com/gl045.htm

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Natasha –
The domestic terrorist Todd Palin could not pass background check.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Tom,
Oh you poor, belly-aching GOP whiner.
Don’t let my foot hit you in the a&& on the way out!

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

bomb, bomb, bomb, Bomb Iran…..

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

El Pajaro:
Ron Reagan Jr is a Democrat and I
don’t believe he speaks for his mother!
Despite her age she can speak for
herself.

Posted by: reaganfan | October 20, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

I am a Maverick
I disagree with myself every five minutes, only a Maverick would do that.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Oh, this is wonderful, Natasha! Keep making these very long posts that you are cutting and pasting from every source you can think of that agrees with us! This will help our side to be victorious against the Obama infidels!

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Reganfan–
I voted for Reagan, and John McCain is no Reagan.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I am a reformer– I reformed Washington, see it is more corrupt than it was 30 years ago when I started.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Hey Natasha.. apparently you missed it, but the FBI is already vetting members of the next administration in an effort to make sure that whether John McCain or Barack Obama is the next president, their staffs will be ready to handle any national security threats.
I guess the two candidates background and security clearance checks went just fine if they have now turned their attention to who they may or may not choose for their staff :)
Sorry to burst your bubble.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/19/transition-planning-gets-started-early-candidates-prepared-national-security/

Posted by: Concerned American | October 20, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Reaganfan,
YES YES! give the the other side the business end of the ugly stick! We know more about Ron Reagan’s mom than he does!

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I am the voice of the middle class…I mean I have never been in the middle class, I was the son of wealth and then of course I dumped my disfigured wife to marry the barbie doll drug addict, but she had a lot of money, my friends. I bought my way into Washington and have made many lobbyist friends. Many of whom run my campaign today. I am sure my lobbyist friends will be very helpful in advising me in how to “help” the middle class, which frankly like the economy I know nothing about.

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Reaganfan,
If you don’t have the facts make something up. Ron Reagan is an independent, d0rk.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

John Sydney McCain,
How can you say these things about yourself!
I require more talking points! I am having another ideological meltdown!Q

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Muslim and Proud–
I’m a Maverick dangit, I am just straight talk expressing you. Is it working?

Posted by: John Sydney McCain | October 20, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

John Sydney McCain,
Yes. I am drinking the Kool-Aid! It is working! Your straight-talk expressing is WORKING!!!!!!

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

natasha, i notice that you post an article from the nyt with a headline that asserts that the paper is ‘trashing’ obama’s health care plan. not at all.
Posted by: antijake
—————————————-
Obiously you have not comprehended their analysis and their conclusion (last paragraph)…
The New York Times trashes Obama’s Health Care Plan…
Health Plan From Obama Spurs Debate
By KEVIN SACK
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23health.html?_r=1&ref=policy&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin
It is one of the most audacious promises in a campaign that has been thick with them.
In speech after speech, Senator Barack Obama has vowed that he will lower the country’s health care costs enough to “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.” Moreover, Mr. Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, has promised that his health plan will be in place “by the end of my first term as president of the United States.”
Whether Mr. Obama can deliver is a matter of considerable dispute among health analysts and economists. While there is consensus that the American health care system is bloated with waste, eliminating enough to save $2,500 per family would require simultaneous and synergistic solutions to a host of problems that have proved intractable for decades.
Even if the next president and Congress can muster the political will, analysts question whether significant savings would materialize in as little as four years, or even in 10. But as Mr. Obama confronts an electorate that is deeply unsettled by escalating health costs, he is offering a precise “chicken in every pot” guarantee based on numbers that are largely unknowable. Furthermore, it is not completely clear what he is promising.
His words about lowering “premiums” by $2,500 for the average family of four have been fairly consistent. But the health policy advisers who formulated the figure say it actually represents the average family’s share of savings not only in premiums paid by individuals, but also in premiums paid by employers and in tax-supported health programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
“What we’re trying to do,” said one of the advisers, David M. Cutler, in explaining the gap between Mr. Obama’s words and his intent, “is find a way to talk to people in a way they understand.”
The original arithmetic was somewhat basic. In May 2007, three Harvard professors who are unpaid advisers to the Obama campaign — Mr. Cutler, David Blumenthal and Jeffrey Liebman — produced a memorandum offering their “best guess” that a menu of changes would produce savings of at least $200 billion a year (it has since been revised to $214 billion). That would amount to about 8 percent of the $2.5 trillion in health care spending projected for 2009, when the next president takes office.
The memorandum attributed specific savings to several broad initiatives, with the numbers plucked from recent studies. Investments in computerized medical records would save $77 billion a year, the advisers wrote. Reducing administrative costs in the insurance industry would yield up to $46 billion. Improving prevention programs and chronic disease management would be worth $81 billion.
The total savings were then divided by the country’s population, multiplied for a family of four, and rounded down slightly to a number that was easy to grasp: $2,500. The average cost of family coverage bought through an employer was $12,106 in 2007, with workers paying $3,281 of that amount, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health research group.
Mr. Obama aspires to cover the country’s 47 million uninsured by requiring insurers to accept all comers, regardless of their health status, and by providing generous tax credits to low-income workers. The tax credits could be used to buy into a new federal health plan or private plans marketed through a government exchange.
The subsidies are expensive, estimated at well over $100 billion. Other components of the Obama plan also bear up-front costs, like a pledge to spend $50 billion over five years to speed the computerization of health records, $6 billion a year on tax credits to small businesses that provide coverage to workers, and an unspecified amount to buffer businesses from high-cost insurance claims.
The source Mr. Obama has identified to pay for them — the repeal of President Bush’s tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 — would cover only about half. That means additional health care savings would be needed, not only to keep premiums under control but also to help pay for the subsidies.
A consensus has emerged among health economists that at least a third of the country’s spending on health care is unnecessary. Both Mr. Obama, of Illinois, and his Republican rival, Senator John McCain of Arizona, agree that significant sums could be saved through reductions in unneeded procedures and improvements in electronic record-keeping, prevention and chronic disease management.
But the dollar values Mr. Obama has attached to individual components of his plan are beginning to attract scrutiny. In particular, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report in May questioning the amount to be saved from the computerization of health systems.
Mr. Obama took his estimate of $77 billion a year from a 2005 study by the RAND Corporation (which cautioned that reductions of that magnitude would not emerge for 15 years). The Congressional analysts found, however, that for various methodological reasons the RAND study was “not an appropriate guide” to potential savings.
This month, Mr. Obama’s health advisers tried to recast the debate so that the questioning of any one number would not undermine the plan’s broader credibility. They enlisted eight health policy experts to sign a letter that, without endorsing the math behind any single initiative, proclaimed it was “not only possible, but likely” that Mr. Obama could save $200 billion annually. They did not say by when.
Mr. Cutler, who helped collect the signatures, said he and his colleagues had decided “that our attempt to lay out one plausible scenario for the savings had created more problems than it had solved.” He added: “Putting the debate where this message puts it — do you believe we can save 8 percent of health spending through a major series of public and private reforms — asks the question in a way that is much more productive than the issue of ‘Do you believe a single estimate among many, many studies?’ ”
Mr. Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign’s estimates were conservative and asserted that much of the savings would come quickly. “We think we could get to $2,500 in savings by the end of the first term, or be very close to it,” Mr. Furman said.
The campaign won additional backing this week from Kenneth E. Thorpe of Emory University, an authority on health care costs who helped formulate Bill Clinton’s failed plan in 1993. In an assessment that he initiated in coordination with the campaign, Mr. Thorpe wrote that if all of Mr. Obama’s proposals were enacted they would reduce health spending by between $203 billion and $273 billion by 2012. He calculated that half of the savings would accrue to the federal government.
The Obama advisers said that while not all of the savings would translate into lower premiums, consumers would gain in other ways. The savings to employers would be passed along as higher wages, they predicted, and the savings to government would eventually mean either lower taxes or added benefits.
But whether employers and governments respond that way cannot be guaranteed, particularly in a difficult economy. And a number of health policy experts have questioned whether the $2,500 projection is either fiscally or politically realistic. Reducing health care costs, they emphasized, means taking money from someone’s pocket and rationing care that Americans have come to expect, a recipe for stiff resistance.
“There is no easy money because, as the saying goes, one person’s fraud and abuse is another person’s income,” said Joseph R. Antos of the American Enterprise Institute. “I wouldn’t think that four years or eight years or probably 10 years will be enough to see numbers of that sort.”
The Commonwealth Fund, a health research group in New York, published a study in December projecting that a robust overhaul consisting of 15 broad initiatives would generate savings of only 6 percent after 10 years. “Doing it by the end of a first term is ambitious and would require tough policies,” said Karen Davis, the group’s president.
Jonathan B. Oberlander, who teaches health policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, called it wishful thinking. “Do they have the potential to generate significant savings in the long run?” Dr. Oberlander asked. “Yes. Do I believe they will produce substantial savings in the short run that can be used to finance Obama’s plan? No.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23health.html?ref=policy&pagewanted=all

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

I declare this blog exorcised of the Neocon demons

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Thank goodness it is finally Tom’s bedtime. Natasha needs to go to bed now too. Once the kiddies are neatly tucked in, the adults can finally have an intelligent conversation! Wishing both of you sweet dreams of a Repug victory! The rest of us have outgrown living in a fantasy world. Nighty-night now to both of you!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Still haven’t totally forgiven Colin Powell for his role in getting us into the utter failure that is the Iraq War, but he’s done a good little bit to get back in my good favor.

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 20, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

That lovable Rush Limbaugh has noted: “name ONE inexperienced white liberal Democrat” that Powell, a republican, has ever endorsed.
and yet, magically, Powell suddenly endorses one of the most liberal democrats around, someone who didn’t agree with the surge?
americans know the truth. Powell is endorsing Obama for one and only one reason: he’s black. Powell even admitted the inexperience, in his list of reasons why he is endorsing, he does not admit experiecne at all.
Race before country. Never midn that Obama had a friendship with a terrorist who had plans to bomb the pentagon, and Fort Dix, and Army base. Powell was an Army General, for gosh sakes! How can he ever look our soldiers in the eye without total shame?
This is more sad that I can say. Powell, who was an American hero, has betrayed his country, by endorsing the enemy.

Posted by: liberati | October 20, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Neocon=Fascist,
HA! Now you see that this blog is NOT exorcised of Neocon demons, as I am still here, and Natasha is still here, spamming like a madwoman, possessed by the demon Pazuzu, SO THERE!

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Natasha,
Time to put away your scissors and clean up your mess. You can do more cut and paste tomorrow. It’s bedtime now. The adults are ready for REAL discussions of the issues.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Yes, Liberati, I agree. It is so, because RUSH SAID IT IS SO!! Give the Liberal infidels the business end of the ugly stick. There are fewer and fewer whites–even white Republicans– who endorse McCain. That means that whites are less racist than blacks, right?

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Why would America worry about Osama trying to destroy America from the outside if we have an Obama, whose extreme left wing, pro ACORN, pro Ayers, Pro Rev. Wright agenda, can destroy the America, from the inside.
That is even worst than Al Qaeda trying to blow us up from the outside.
Obama can blow us up from the INSIDE.

Posted by: BlownFromTheInside | October 20, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

liberati,
Fort Dix IS an army base! Or didn’t you know that?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

I guess the two candidates background and security clearance checks went just fine if they have now turned their attention to who they may or may not choose for their staff :)
Posted by (un)Concerned American + 24 dozen different names of his
————————————
You are indeed a “sleeping beauty”. This does not prove that they are done “investigating” Messiah Obama.
Do you really think that the FBI, the CIA, etc. give background check results to the media?
That is what “impeachments” of someone on office are for! And, Presidents are NOT excluded.
I doubt if you – an Obama operative (bot) knows more about the process than a retired DEA officer or the retired FBI agent who was interviewed by Greta Van Susteren two days ago.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Natasha needs to go meet up with Rocky and Bullwinkle.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Ok, here is the problem with the whole Colon Powell endorsement that the media is trying to tout as some great feat for Obama. Colon Powell was the Keynote speaker at the Republican Convention in 2000 and endorsed George W. Bush for President over Al Gore who had been the VP for 8 years and had a wealth of Experience, but yet he endorsed Bush that had absolutely no foreign policy experience. You see where that got us 8 years later. It pains me as an AA to say this but this is clearly based on race, if he did not endorse Obama he would have been Uncle Tomed out of town like the rest of the Black Leaders that decided that they had a mind of their own and chose to endorse the best person for the job not the person that had the same skin color as them. I like Colon Powell. I continue to be proud of his accomplishments, however, he knowingly chose the lesser candidate last time and he has done it again. Pity.

Posted by: Kim | October 20, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Sen. Obama is going to write checks to people who don’t pay taxes. That is welfare.
Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain
————————————-
Obama gets his ideas from Carl Marx. If elected, he would be the first Marxist President of the “American Union” (like in Soviet Union).
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I probably shouldn’t waste my time correcting liberati, huh? As Muslim and Proud said, we musn’t oppose the great GOP propaganda machine, led by dear Rush Limbaugh, by cluttering the discussion with FACTS!
to neocon=fascist: You have a sharp wit and an even sharper tongue! I commend you.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Yes, Liberati, I agree. It is so, because RUSH SAID IT IS SO!! Give the Liberal infidels the business end of the ugly stick. There are fewer and fewer whites–even white Republicans– who endorse McCain. That means that whites are less racist than blacks, right?
Posted by: Muslim and Proud | Oct 20, 2008 12:49:34 AM
—————————————-
In 2000 and 2004 Blacks overwhelming rejected Bush as they are rejecting McCain now. So maybe other voters should follow their lead this time to restore our great nation.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 20, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

BlownFromTheInside,
You forgot to mention that, in addition to being a christian, he is also a MUSLIM!!
THE INFIDEL! A muslim who was seen on a ten dollar food stamp with PORK ribs!! a CHRISTIAN MUSLIM EATING PORK!
And he’s BLACK!!
Did you know this?

Posted by: Muslim and Proud | October 20, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

McCain said, “Colin Powell, a man who I admire as much as any man in the world, person in the world…” [NY Times interview with John McCain, 7/13/08]

Posted by: Thinking | October 20, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Posted by: Kim | Oct 20, 2008 12:58:19 AM
At least if you are going to bad mouth the man for his endorsement at least learn to spell his name correctly.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

McCain considered Powell for a running mate. “Retired Gen. Colin Powell is among the potential running mates who have been considered by John McCain, campaign advisers told Politico. Powell was among the possible vice presidential choices the Arizona Republican senator was thinking of when he said he would not rule out a supporter of abortion rights, a key adviser said.” [Politico, 8/23/08]

Posted by: Thinking | October 20, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Likewise. It comes from not getting all of my talking points from Rush Limbaugh. It’s a lot easier to think of what to say when you’re not trying to stay consistent with Limbaugh’s shifting positions.

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Powell is just ONE former secretary of state who took SO LONG to decide to back Obama. He just now come out when he thinks Obama is going to win.
MCCAIN has FOUR FOUR FOUR SECRETRAY OF STATES BACKING HIM from Kissinger down .. And they have SUPPORTED MCCAIN from start of campaign.
Where has Powell being thus far .. sitting on the fence to see where the ball falls .. and back what he thinks is the “winning” side?
Good strategy on Powell’s end.
But does not change our minds … MCCAIN/PALIN still is our choice.
WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO ACORN – VOTER FRAUD IS NOT OKAY …
WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO CNN, MSNBC AND THE MEDIA – MEDIA BIASENESS IT NOT NEWS AT ALL AND IS NOT OKAY …
WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO OBAMA – PAST ASSOCIATIONS WITH RADICALS AS MANY AS YOU HAVE, IS A PATTERN AND NOT AN COINCIDENCE.

Posted by: NoObamaNoPelosiNoReid COMOBA | October 20, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Powell being black and endorsing Obama means nothing to most of white America…WHERE IS THE HEADLINE WITH McCAIN’S ENDORSEMENT OF FOUR EX SECRETARIES OF STATE FOR McCAIN? Oh, they’re white, so I guess that doesn’t count.
They had to stop the bleeding from Joe the Plumber and take attention off the 14 million watching Gov. Palin on SNL.
POWELL’S ENDORSEMENT DOES NOT MATTER WITH INDEPENDENTS OR UNDECIDEDS (whites)…there are no black voters Obama needs to get.
Howard Stern did a prank in Harlem and asked every black there if they were voting Obama even tho he wanted to stay in Iraq and they said Yes, and even tho he picked Sarah Palin as VP and they said Yes, and even tho he wants to give a $5,000 health insurance rebate…and on and on. THEY DIDN’T EVEN KNOW OBAMA’S PLANS BUT BLINDLY SAID WE’RE VOTING FOR HIM.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!!!

Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 20, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Jwench- I spelled it exactly how I wanted to. Thanks

Posted by: Kim | October 20, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Natasha,
The worst has already happened: the son and grandson of Prescot Bush–a major Nazi sympathizer of his time–were both President, and GHWB was the head spook under Ford.
McCarthy though that fascism was better than communism, too. That was a great time for you fascists, Natasha. Are you hoping for a comeback?

Posted by: Neocon=Fascist | October 20, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO ACORN – VOTER FRAUD IS NOT OKAY …
Tell the GOP that. I see they are up to their antics. John McCain was the keynote speaker at an ACORN rally in 2006. Voter purging is not ok, GOP.
WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO CNN, MSNBC AND THE MEDIA – MEDIA BIASENESS IT NOT NEWS AT ALL AND IS NOT OKAY …
Tell Fox News, Hannity, Rush and the other Republican pukes it’s not Ok to spew lies and hate. If your candidates actually talked about issues instead of bashing they wouldn’t get the negative coverage they do.
WE HAVE TO SEND A MESSAGE TO OBAMA – PAST ASSOCIATIONS WITH RADICALS AS MANY AS YOU HAVE, IS A PATTERN AND NOT AN COINCIDENCE.
Might I remind you of McCain’s involvement with the US Council for World Freedom, William Timmons and G.Gordon Liddy.
Posted by: NoObamaNoPelosiNoReid COMOBA | Oct 20, 2008

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Can someone here please explain to me why so many McCain/Palin supporters feel the need to SHOUT to make their point? In case you folks haven’t noticed, we can’t hear you in here. Wasn’t it Teddy Roosevelt who said, “Speak softly, and carry a BIG stick”? Obama seems to have the stick this time around. He is certainly the one speaking softly. And it is the American people who will be speaking LOUD and CLEAR on Nov. 4th.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

LOL! Laugh and discount Rush all you want, but you can not deny that he has an audience of millions, including many undecideds. now your poor desperate Obama does need every single vote, doesn’t he? Rush has the courage to speak the truth, unlike all these MSM who have derelicted their duty of speaking the truth about Obama.
Isn’t interesting, that you Obama supporters, had attacked Hillary before like crazy, because she voted for the war, and you were all over her as evil for that, even though Biden did too, along with 75% of the Senate. And now Powell, who was the pure symbol of the invasion of Iraq, has endorsed your precious Obama, and now you are just peeing in your pants with glee!
Hypocrites? You called Bush and Powell war mongers before, but, golly gee, he is endorsing precious Obama, so he must be a good guy! so, and now if Bush endorses Obama, Bush will be your new hero now?
LOL! You guys are just so dimwitted it is unbelievable.
Trust me, for the undecided voter, or blue collar mid America, Powell endorsing Obama is SOOOOO obviously racist. YOu can criticize it all you want, but this, along with the 95% black vote for Obama, merely gives permission for voters to vote for McCain , for no other reason than he is white.
Racism is ugly isn’t it ? It works both ways. Either it’s ugly, or it’s not.
Powell has betrayed us and endorsed the enemy.
And once again, President McCain will step in and fight for America again.

Posted by: liberati | October 20, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

If Obama has 3.1 million repeat donors willing to give money repeatedly then this nation, then American economy is not as bad as Obama think it is.
Obama is bending campaign finance rules, this is the biggest scam since the dot com bust.
Posted by: Greg h
———————————
I have heard that foreign nationals are sending money using addresses of people that they know in the US. Also, many people are sending multiple donations of less than $200 so the Obama Machine does not have to disclose the source.
I agree – if so many Americans are giving so much money to Obama – then the economy must be better than we thought.
If Marxist Obama – the biggest hypocrite in American politics – feels that bad about “poor Americans” perhaps he should donate the $150 million or portion of it to food banks across America, instead of spending it in stupid ads and on purchasing prime TV time (Oct. 29th) to promote his “Big Ego”.
Oh! I know… he is already giving us a preview of his future “spending patterns” …

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

How do you people live with yourselves. Do you like anybody? It would be one thing if you posted legitimate stuff, but 90% of the Republican postings are parroting exactly what you hear from Rush, Hannity and the other Republican hate machines.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

To the moron who keeps posting the same rambling, nonsensical manifesto over and over again on this page (using different names): GET A LIFE. Are you really so desperate for attention? You make all thinking conservatives look bad with this childish tactic.

Posted by: GetAClue | October 20, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Not so fast Joe.

Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I have heard that foreign nationals are sending money using addresses of people that they know in the US. Also, many people are sending multiple donations of less than $200 so the Obama Machine does not have to disclose the source.
I agree – if so many Americans are giving so much money to Obama – then the economy must be better than we thought.
If Marxist Obama – the biggest hypocrite in American politics – feels that bad about “poor Americans” perhaps he should donate the $150 million or portion of it to food banks across America, instead of spending it in stupid ads and on purchasing prime TV time (Oct. 29th) to promote his “Big Ego”.
Oh! I know… he is already giving us a preview of his future “spending patterns” …
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 1:21:41 AM
Natasha where did you supposedly hear this? You pull so much stuff out of your rear end it’s pathetic. For once give a credible site for your accusations.
That must be the Republican mantra “IF you can’t win on your own merit,slime them with lies”.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

“I agree – if so many Americans are giving so much money to Obama – then the economy must be better than we thought.”
Exactly. The guy is spending 29 million a week.

Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

At least they can’t call him an Uncle Tom.

Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Isn’t it a Republican mantra that we should invest for the future, whether we can afford to on minimum wage or not? Perhaps the Obama supporters are finely following Republican advice! Doesn’t that warm the cockles of your hearts?
I’m still waiting for someone, anyone, to explain what all the shouting’s about.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Talking about ACORN, well guess what our GOP friends are doing….
‘SACRAMENTO — Dozens of newly minted Republican voters say they were duped into joining the party by a GOP contractor with a trail of fraud complaints stretching across the country.
Voters contacted by The Times said they were tricked into switching parties while signing what they believed were petitions for tougher penalties against child molesters. Some said they were told that they had to become Republicans to sign the petition, contrary to California initiative law. Others had no idea their registration was being changed.
“I am not a Republican,” insisted Karen Ashcraft, 47, a pet-clinic manager and former Democrat from Ventura who said she was duped by a signature gatherer into joining the GOP. “I certainly . . . won’t sign anything in front of a grocery store ever again.”
It is a bait-and-switch scheme familiar to election experts. The firm hired by the California Republican Party — a small company called Young Political Majors, or YPM, which operates in several states — has been accused of using the tactic across the country.
Election officials and lawmakers have launched investigations into the activities of YPM workers in Florida and Massachusetts. In Arizona, the firm was recently a defendant in a civil rights lawsuit. Prosecutors in Los Angeles and Ventura counties say they are investigating complaints about the company.’

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

How about you, Natasha? Care to enlighten me on all the shouting? Or are you still busy with your scissors?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Isn’t it a Republican mantra that we should invest for the future, whether we can afford to on minimum wage or not? Perhaps the Obama supporters are finely following Republican advice! Doesn’t that warm the cockles of your hearts?
I’m still waiting for someone, anyone, to explain what all the shouting’s about.
Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 1:32:19 AM
I wouldn’t know what they stood for, they haven’t talked about the issues.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Thank you, STP. Isn’t that interesting? How wonderful that party affiliation doesn’t matter in a General Election! These folks will have plenty of time to get their registrations straightened out before the next Primary season. Nice to know that the Repugs were trying, though. LOL

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Posted by: STP | Oct 20, 2008 1:37:18 AM
Now you know the GOP isn’t capable of doing anything shady. wink wink

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Too many red flags regarding Barack Hussein Obama’s criminal, terrorist, spiritual associations, but his (Obama’s) cult followers are so eager to turn a blind eye and deaf ear, and entrust him with the most important job in the world. With all his AMERICA HATING ASSOCIATIONS, Barack Obama wouldn’t pass a background investigation to obtain a secret clearance to join the military or be hired as a federal law enforcement officer. If Barack Obama is elected POTUS, what’s the purpose of our military, Homeland Security employees such as Customs and Border Protection officers, Transportation Security officers, and Border Patrol officers risking their lives to protect and secure our country’s borders, seaports and airports from terrorists, criminals, drug traffickers, alien smugglers, and illegal aliens when, if Barack Obama is elected POTUS, he and his wife are going to be having tea and sleeping with our enemies. God bless and help us all.

Posted by: Diana in California | October 20, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

JWench,
I just thought with all the recent talk about Bush/McCain’s plans to privatize Social Security, and the admonitions that we should all save and invest for our own retirements, that the Right-wing wackos in here earlier might understand that Obama supporters are following their advice in the only way they can afford to. They are investing in the Obama campaign so that they will have a future to look forward to! But, you are right, they don’t seem to want to discuss the issues … even when the discussion is about their own proposals.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

NV-Sparkle and Jwench, you are absolutely correct. Even though I do NOT agree with what some of the employees of ACORN are doing, I just wanted to highlight what hypocrites the GOPs are. I wonder what justification they will have for this one. Nice talking to the both of you and have a great night!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

no f0cking offense, but an endorsement does give anyone the right to be free from questions about their ability to do the job

Posted by: chris | October 20, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 1:57:46 AM
What gets me is they talk about associations. Fine. But then they need to discuss McCain’s associates as well.
You ask them why they they are voting McCain and they can’t give an answer without bashing Obama.
I get frustrated with people who deliberately lie.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Diana in California,
Have you not heard about the Palins involvement with Alaska Independent Party? Do you think that wanting to secede from the union, and proposing violence to accomplish that goal, is a Pro-America activity?
You clearly believe in all the hate-mongering that the GOP has been spewing lately. Do you still believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, too?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

obama and his lemmings have acted for a while now like they should be entitled to the job simply because dubya was the worst president in our nation’s history (which he is), which is ironic considering dubya has long acted, in his adult life, like he is also entitled to the power he has gotten……let us hope obama and his lemmings actually walk the talk of Change and act responsibly and with humility….

Posted by: chris | October 20, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Okay, I guess I am back. Here was what I posted before…if we want to play raise the red flag games…
‘Then, in 2006, Palin won the governor’s race with a vow to reform state ethics. But in less than two years, she has repeatedly taken actions that violated her own stated standards for ethical behavior — if not state law. In the process, the Republican vice presidential nominee has become much like the old-school politicians she attacked during her rise to power.
Some examples:
_She pummeled opponents for giving oil companies and other businesses too much control of state government. Yet she appointed the founder of an engineering firm that received $6.8 million in state business as head of the transportation department.
_She has accepted dozens of gifts worth tens of thousands of dollars since taking office, including two free trips last year that she failed to report on disclosure forms, despite criticizing state legislators for the gifts they take.
_She is under another investigation, accused of misusing her office to campaign against a voter referendum calling for tighter mining regulations. Her husband, Todd, has accepted free trips from a mining company to look at their proposed new site.
_Another ethics complaint, unresolved, accuses her staff of finding a state job for a friend and campaign contributor.’
And if we want to talk about guilty by association, lets talk about G Gordon Liddy who is the criminal and ‘domestic terrorist’ mastermind behind The Watergate scandal who McCain has taken contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator’s campaigns — including $1,000 this year.
‘If anything, the truth is that McCain’s connection to Liddy is vastly more direct and troubling than Obama’s serving on a foundation board with Ayers. After all, Obama forcefully repudiated Ayers violence while McCain essentially justifies Liddy. It offers compelling proof that McCain’s embrace of this line of attack is a cynical desperation move and not a sincere political argument.’
And how about McCain’s connections to the Keating 5, Jack Abrahmoff, gambling (giving huge tax breaks to casinos and he is known to be a lifelong gambler), extramarital affairs etc…?????

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Jwench,
These folks will perpetuate the lies at all costs. It’s their ONLY chance to resurrect McCain’s sinking ship. I’m assuming that No Child Left Behind came too late to help them. Otherwise, they could read PolitiFact.com, Snopes.com, or any of the other fine fact-checking sites, and learn that they are perpetuating disproven myths and urban legends. What a pity that there are still so many illiterate people in this great country!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

I’m so happy to know the parties are coming together…this is a sign of goodness and blessing. I hope the American people can heal once again after all of this is all over with. And division of the people will become a thought of the past as we move forward as one.

Posted by: kim fields | October 20, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Chris,
“I have voted with President Bush more than 90% of the time. That’s more than most of my Republican colleagues.” – John McCain
Don’t you get it? McCain IS Dubya, and we have finally had enough! Haven’t you?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Ditto Kim…God Bless American!!!

Posted by: T. Scott | October 20, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

What’s funny to me is that certain people are scared of Obama. I don’t know why because ever since this country has been ran by certain people, things have been politically and morally wrong. Even the true Americans (Indians) have become almost extinct. (Talk about unpatriotic) Then, you get all of these comments against Obama which are completely malicious, even one on here in which the lady has just about written a whole book , towards a man who is part-white. It would seem that he should be accepted as a American, but you get people, mainly old and white, calling him unpatriotic, going so far as to call him a terrorist. Just low-down and dirty blows, even questioning his intellect. Just goes to show, you got to be of a pure white race for some people to even begin to respect you as a human being, most of these judgemental persons can barely run their own households, let alone carry a college education. Everyone knows that McCain is very near to his death bed and will probably be senile before 4 years run out. Clearly only racist people are supporting McCain. I definitely hope and pray to the ever loving and unbiased God above that Obama win. I am ready for a change!! All Americans of all color are ready for a change from these terrible old ways!!

Posted by: Tameka | October 20, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Why is it that every time someone asks these Repugs a question, they disappear? I guess that they must be embarassed because they don’t have any answers. Anyone care to reply?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Jwench,
These folks will perpetuate the lies at all costs. It’s their ONLY chance to resurrect McCain’s sinking ship. I’m assuming that No Child Left Behind came too late to help them. Otherwise, they could read PolitiFact.com, Snopes.com, or any of the other fine fact-checking sites, and learn that they are perpetuating disproven myths and urban legends. What a pity that there are still so many illiterate people in this great country!
Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 2:13:27 AM
I totally agree :)

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Rob,
Can you ask the Senator to provide:
1. His transcripts at Occidental.
2. His transcripts at Columbia and at least show some of his friends.
3. His thesis at Harvard. Any writing?
4. Any student loans records?
You knoe these colleges aren’t CHEAP!
Obama did not attend these colleges on scholarships.
Why doesn’t Obama provide the public with this info?
Something to hide? health record?
Posted by: Voter In America
———————————
He is the “Chosen One” – the “Messiah” we have all been waiting for – “God’s Gift to America” per Bela Pelosi….
You are asking too many questions my friend… Barack Obama is above any suspision. How many questions do you think Carl Marx ever answered?
CNN reported last week that McCain has released ALL his medical records. Obama has refused to do so. He has only released an one page “Doctor’s note” that says that he is in good health. (like those notes kids bring to school when they are out sick ..)
The pathetic left-wing-liberal media has talked again and again about Senator McCain and his wife’s medical health issues. Why media Morons are not digging to Barack Obama’s refusal to release ALL his medical records?
What? Is he mentally ill and trying to hide it???!!!
The media and the Obama campaign operatives were bitching about Cindy McCain and Sarah Palin to release their tax returns…. But the same Morons have not once questioned why Obama is not releasing the information you have asked in your comment, especially his medical records.
Have we seen his Birth Certificate yet?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/stephanopoul-13.html?cid=135508891#comment-135508891

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Obama raised over $150 million in September
“Wow. Do you know what could be done with that 150million. Why not spread the wealth around? I could use a little of that!”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/stephanopoul-13.html?cid=135508891#comment-135508891
———————————–
In the mean-time he gives us “pretty speeches” about how much pain he feels for us – poor Americans! That’s is the same “pain” that Lenin, Marx, Stalin, and many other “saviors” felt for their “comrades”.
Yeah, let’s distribute the wealth! Let’s start with Obama’s wealth first.
What the heck is wrong with half of the country? Since when the DemocRATS got so much wealth – enough to spread it to Obama’s campaign so that “Messiah Obama” can promote his “Big Ego” ???!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Natasha, it is because we don’t just talk the talk, but we walk the walk and actually donate money to the Candidate we believe in…and we will continue to do so until this election is over.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

I’d be more impressed w/Powell’s endorsement if it wasn’t juxtaposed with the memory of him in the UN justifying the war in Iraq. His credibility was a large part of many peoples’ support for Bush action — i.e., if Powell says it’s so, it must be so. But it wasn’t then … is it now?

Posted by: Memory | October 20, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

To Memory,
Do you also remember Powell’s shame and embarassment when he resigned? He was used and abused by the Bush administration! Or do you only remember what you want to remember. Perhaps your memory isn’t that great, after all.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Natasha,
Please tell us in your own words what McCain will do to better this country. NO COPYING AND PASTING ALLOWED.(No Obama smears either).

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Jwench,
You are fighting a losing battle on this one! Natasha will not be able to answer you if she can’t cut and paste from Karl Rove’s playbook. She can’t think for herself, much less speak for herself! Sorry to have to be the one to answer for her.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Alright,you Obama supporters seem so apt to defend him,defend this;how do can you defend that he has conducted his campaign by Saul Alinskys Rules for Radicals?Or how he has used class warfare to try and win votes,or how he voted against banning Partial Birth Abortion,or how he is trying to shove Tax Hikes down our throat while his campaign tells us to be “patriotic” and pony up more money?And how do you defend him saying that Saddam Hussein was not a threat to this country?And I have a word for people who insult me after I log off,afraid to do it while I’m on the page;Cowards.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Born in the U.S.A.?
08/25/2008
By: KEITH PHUCAS
PHILADELPHIA – A Lafayette Hill attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court Thursday challenging Sen. Barack Obama’s claim to United States citizenship. The action seeks to remove the Democratic candidate from the November ballot.
To be eligible to serve as U.S. president, a person must be born in this country. According to Obama’s birth certificate, which his campaign posted on its Internet site in June to quell rumors that he is foreign born, the Illinois senator was born in Hawaii on Aug. 6, 1961.
On Thursday, Philip Berg filed a temporary restraining order in federal court to bar Obama from running for president, claiming the Democratic candidate was actually born in Africa.
“We really don’t believe he was born in Hawaii,” Berg said. “We think he was born in Kenya.”
The presidential candidate’s father, Barack Obama Sr., was born and raised in a small village in Kenya, according to Obama’s campaign Web site.
Berg’s suit claims the senator’s grandmother, brother and sister, who live in Kenya, believe they were present during Obama’s birth in the African country.
Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, grew up in Kansas, and his parents met at the University of Hawaii when Dunham was a student there, according to the Obama campaign.
Eventually, Obama’s father returned to Kenya, and his son grew up in Hawaii with his mother and for a few years in Indonesia after Dunham married an Indonesian man, Lolo Soetoro. Also, Obama lived with his maternal grandparents in Hawaii.
“If he was born in Hawaii, and he was adopted in Indonesia by Lolo Soetoro, (Obama) would lose his citizenship,” Berg said.
The Obama campaign has a special section on its Web site, “Fight the Smears,” that debunks the birth certificate story and other reports that have circulated about him during the campaign.
“It’s part of a smear campaign,” said an Obama campaign volunteer who identified herself as Rachel. “There are just so many lies out there.”
The lawsuit claims three “independent” document forensic experts performed extensive tests on the digitally-scanned image of Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” posted on the campaign’s site and found the document to be “a forgery.”
Jerome Corsi, author of the book, “The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality,” has also deemed the birth certificate phony, according to The Annenberg Political Fact Check, http://www.FactCheck.org.
The Annenberg Political Fact Check, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, aims to expose deception and confusion in U.S. politics.
Recently, FactCheck.org staffers “touched, examined and photographed” the original birth certificate kept at the Obama campaign headquarters in Chicago and concluded the document is genuine.
“The evidence is clear: Barack Obama was born in the U.S.A.,” FactCheck.org staffers concluded.
Sean Smith, Obama’s Pennsylvania communications director, was contacted Friday about the suit but declined comment.
The civil suit filed by Berg will be reviewed by the U.S. Federal Election Commission, according to Patty Hartman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Keith Phucas can be reached at kphucas@timesherald.com or 610-272-2500, ext. 211.
http://www.timesherald.com/site/printerFriendly.cfm?brd=1672&dept_id=33380&newsid=20089295

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

And how do you defend him saying that Saddam Hussein was not a threat to this country
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 2:58:25 AM
Hussein did not have WMD’s . Tell me what threat he was to the US. He wasn’t involve in 9/11.I a curious as to why you think we attacked Iraq.
I might ask you the same question about this statement from McCain.
“Look, is this guy, Bin Laden, really the bad guy that’s depicted? Most of us have never heard of him before.” McCain in 1998, after Clinton shot missiles at Osama

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Natasha,
I knew you couldn’t do it. What a parrot and not a good one at that. Bad Parrot…noooo crackers for yooooooo.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Dear Obama for Latrine Cleaner,
I’m not at all afraid to answer your questions! Let’s start near the beginning, shall we? I’ll go slow so that you can keep up.
1. Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals has nothing to do with Obama’s campaign. He has addressed the issues. (Something you McCain supporters are still afraid to do.)
2. He has used “class warfare” to oppose the continued robbing of the middle class to support the rich. (Much the same way you McCain supporters keep using your phony Joe the Plumber to scare the middle class into continuing to support the richest in our country.)
3. The vote you reference on Partial Birth Abortion would have created a redundant law in Illinois. There was already a perfectly good law on the books.
4. His tax hikes would only affect those whose income exceeds $250,000. And if you are that well off, you can easily afford to pay your fair share for a change!
5. Saddam Hussein wasn’t a threat to our country. They proved he did not have any WMD’s left. They proved he did not have any missile systems that could reach the USA. And they proved that he was not involved with Osama bin Laden or Al Qaida. Your precious Bush got us into the wrong war, in the wrong place, and lost control of the REAL War on Terrorism.
Now for the last part of your post: If you hadn’t gotten left behind by No Child Left Behind, you could have read all of this elsewhere. It’s been all over the web for a very long time now. Instead of showing you ignorance here, why don’t you try checking out some of the wonderful fact checking sites that are available for FREE!
I’m finished with you now. You may go.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

I,The USA,the UN,Nato and almost every other nation in the world believe that nerve gas is a WMD,look it up.Especially VX,which he had many stockpiles of.Enough he could have took out multiple major cities.Want tosay that again?

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Jwench,
You are fighting a losing battle on this one! Natasha will not be able to answer you if she can’t cut and paste from Karl Rove’s playbook. She can’t think for herself, much less speak for herself! Sorry to have to be the one to answer for her.
Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 2:57:46 AM
I know. I just sprayed a can of RAID (facts) at a bunch on another board spewing lies. Bombard ‘em with facts.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

I,The USA,the UN,Nato and almost every other nation in the world believe that nerve gas is a WMD,look it up.Especially VX,which he had many stockpiles of.Enough he could have took out multiple major cities.Want tosay that again?
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 3:14:45 AM
While I am looking that up, do you want to answer the second part of my post?

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

And how do you defend him saying that Saddam Hussein was not a threat to this country?
My problems with the Iraq war are two folds, why are we there in the first place when we have no ‘actual’ and ‘concrete’ proof of WMD and more importantly, we needed most of our military in Afghanistan and not Iraq to finish the job and get rid of Bin Laden.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Obama didn’t have to use class warfare with me, I have my own mind to think with and my own experiences of racial injustices before I ever knew who Obama was! As far as the tax hikes as you call them, what about the tax hikes that Mc Cain has propsosed? Oh yeah, that’s right, you are blinded by a $5,000 bribe that in no way compares to the plan that Obama proposes for our future. Obama is not the reason why abortion clinics exist, the person who go to get the abortion needs to take that up with-in themselves. That is also a moral issue that begins with in the home, not Obama. If you would recall he said himself that he does not believe in abortions and do not raise his family that way. Just because Obama name is close to Osama does not mean that he is a terrorist. You want to blame Obama for all the wrong done in the world, but remember McCain has the experience and has been there through it all. That alone makes me distrust him because if he has had his hands in this mess, he is one of the main contributors to this economic crisis thats going on. Lady, I do hope that you are still here when I post this for I am no coward, it’s you who is running on and off spitting venom and hate. I do not have to insult you, you make yourself look silly all alone.

Posted by: Tameka | October 20, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08,
I’ll happily say it as many times as necessary to get it through your thick skull. Saddam Hussein WAS NOT a threat to the United States, no matter what Bush, Cheney, Rove, Limbaugh, et al, might have led (misled) you to believe.
Class dismissed. You may go now.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

NO COPYING AND PASTING ALLOWED.(No Obama smears either).
Posted by: Jwench
———————————-
Pardon moi?
What’s the matter BOZO? Obviously the truth from sources to which I always provide the links hurts, hah? TOO BAD.
You are in no position to tell me what to post and from what sources.
Go get a dog so you can feel like a master.
GET LOST OBAMA BOT (with 24 different names)… Oh, and stop taking lessons on “plagiarism” by Joe Biden!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Hey NV Fizzle,he has based the way he runs his campaign on the book,we are a capitalist nation(wealth redistribution is communism,look it up,smarta–)the tax percintage is the same all the way up what he proposes to do is make the rich pay more taxes,which is punishing hard work(which kills jobs,and may I mention that it doesn’t take too many employees to have 250,000 just in PAYROLL).It’s called a suicide bomber,or have you been under a rock during this whole war?And they have satellite images of suspected WMDs rolling into syria.Sorry to rain on your parrade.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Obama must have been thinking of “The 57 States of Islam”…
REUTERS NEWS
May 9 – On the campaign trail in Beaverton, Oregon, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama mistakenly tells a crowd that’s he’s been to 57 states – with one left to go.
Reuters video:
Obama: I have been in 57 states
http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=82127

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Natasha,
Please note that I was able to answer ALL of Obama for Latrine Cleaner’s questions WITHOUT resorting to cut and paste. It’s not that difficult when you actually READ the articles you prefer to cut and paste from. Try it sometime! You MIGHT learn something!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Natasha,
Why are wasting your time cutting and posting things because the same can be done for McCain/Palin? If you think there is nothing wrong with the McCain/Palin ticket and they are ‘perfect’ then you are living in a fantasy world.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Didn’t BIDEN a few months ago say Obama was not ready to lead.
Posted by: Officer Vike
———————————
Flip-flopping is the trademark of the DemocRATS!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/08/06/national/a092300D42.DTL&hw=WMD&sn=001&sc=1000
Administration statements still describe Saddam’s Iraq as a threat. Despite the official findings, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has allowed only that “perhaps” WMD weren’t in Iraq.
Would you like to tell me where you found that information?

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Ain’t a lady tameka,and it is not bacause he is black that I do not like him(I like Bill Cosbey and he doesn’t like obama.does that make him a rascist too).I do not like him because he is a Communist,socialist,stalinist(pick whichever you like)and because he will ruin this country I want to pass onto future generations.And Fizzle,I have told you that he had WMDs,Nato and UN inspectors said so,so it isn’t just Bush.He said he wanted to destroy this country and had the means to take out some of our cities,AND HE WASN’T A THREA?!?You need to look on ebay and see if they sell common sense,your all out.I believe if someone threatens you with WMDs and has the WMDs to back it up you don’t try “Tough Diplomacy”,you take them out.Whatever means necessary.Again,sorry to burst your bubble.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

What’s the matter BOZO? Obviously the truth from sources to which I always provide the links hurts, hah? TOO BAD.
You are in no position to tell me what to post and from what sources.
Go get a dog so you can feel like a master.
GET LOST OBAMA BOT (with 24 different names)… Oh, and stop taking lessons on “plagiarism” by Joe Biden!
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 3:22:06 AM
Here is what I asked you before.
Natasha,
Please tell us in your own words what McCain will do to better this country. NO COPYING AND PASTING ALLOWED.(No Obama smears either).
Posted by: Jwench | Oct 20, 2008 2:53:26 AM
Those links don’t hurt because I have done my research. I have two names. One I quit using because there was another J. I changed it to Jwench.
Unlike some people I use the same name. I am not afraid to stand up and defend what I post.
Please tell me what I have plagarized.
If you can’t tell my why you think McCain is a better choice, then so be it.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

to Obama for Latrine Cleaner -
You have proved your stupidity! Payroll expenses are a deductible expense, moron! Taxes are paid only on profits, not business expenses. If you were in an income class to be worried about Obama’s tax plan, you would already know that!
And, a gentleman would keep the language CLEAN, there are ladies present, you cretin!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

At a time that Europe is awakening up – turning to the “right” after years of “failed socialism” it would be a crime to elect Marxist Obama as the next President of the United States of America.
Even France learned the lessons of its “failed socialism” and elected conservative Nicholas Sarkozy – a staunch friend of the United States. And here we are – Americans are about to let our country destroyed by MARXIST BARACK OBAMA!
The following video is for the geopolitically savvy and morally sound American patriots – not for the “Obama Communist Youth”!
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
“France’s new leader Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech before Congress that was, dare I say, almost…Reaganesque. He called America “the greatest nation,” among other platitudes.
You can view the whole thing here, and I really think you should all watch it.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.
What’s particularly interesting is that, years ago when the Bush presidency was new and Iraq was a fresh issue, the left told us constantly that George Bush was making America less popular in the world. Yet during the President’s term in office three of our traditional allies (Canada, Germany and now France) elected leaders that displaced virulently anti-Bush and anti-American leaders with people more of Sarkozy’s temperament (Stephen Harper in Canada and Angela Merkel in Germany).
Sort of almost seems like…that whole “less popular America” thing just isn’t true.”
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

Any news channel that had coverage,I guess you were living under a rock.And Fizzle,you answered none of my questions.And I’m going to throw another one out there,how is the Marxist quote “To each according to his need,from each according to his ability.”any differant from the Obama economic plan?

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am

I thought that in America we had the freedom of speech and religion and the pursuit of happiness…
Let me ask you Natasha, are you mad because he wasn’t talking about the 57 leaders of the KKK? What religion do you follow? Are you really an american? What college did you attend? Where is your birth certificate?……See how malicious you sound? That is the type of attitude that is corrupting america.
No way would I side with a campaign with people with such hated and viciousness in their hearts. It is people like you that let me know how crucial it is not to let McCain win.

Posted by: Tameka | October 20, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
Please tell us, and be honest now, how the last 8 years of the Bush/McCain’s trickle down economy has worked out for you and the our country lately? If the top 1% is controlling over 20% of the wealth and the bottom 50% is controlling less than 14% of the wealth in this country then I think it is time for us to do something to change how the wealth are distributed. There is not reason why some CEO’s are making $5 to $10 million per MONTH and even the President of our country is making less than $500k per YEAR!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

Any news channel that had coverage,I guess you were living under a rock.And Fizzle,you answered none of my questions.And I’m going to throw another one out there,how is the Marxist quote “To each according to his need,from each according to his ability.”any differant from the Obama economic plan?
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 3:43:47 AM
That’s clever. I researched what you said and the sites I came across do not say that. If I remember correctly the final outcome was there were no WMD’s and Bush had lied.
Please post your source. It’s a simple request. IF you are so adamant about your position you would back it up with a source.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

I was saying that you would have to make a lot of money to pay for a few people making medium wage.Taking words out of context will not help your precious Marxist.I have not seen you telling YOUR side to stop calling US names.And a lot of the women I know have used language a lot stronger than mine to express their dislike of Obama.And call me a cretin again I’ll stick my foot were the sun don’t shine.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

dear cretin,
Sorry if the truth hurts. I couldn’t tell that you had such sensitive sensibilities! Put that wherever makes you comfortable. I don’t have to call you an idiot. You make that self-evident.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
If that is your mentality about WMDs then why don’t we just attack Russia and China as well since they are our enemies also? They are communist countries and I am sure they don’t like us very much.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 3:42:54 AM
Here’s some quotes from McCain about the French:
I’m as frustrated with the French, I think, as anyone, but look, there’s going to be other challenges and there are going to be other issues. As long as there’s a war on terrorism going on, we’re all going to have to work together.
John McCain
On France’s stance on Iraq, interview March 2003.
They [the French] remind me a little bit of an aging actress of the 1940s who is still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn’t have the face for it.
John McCain
On France’s stance on Iraq, February 2003.
Do you really think Sarkozy is going to be negative while he’s here?

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

I am gone, blogging to these people will not solve anything. As long as they keep looking for negativity, they will find it. While they keep talking, I’ll be walking my walk and casting my vote.

Posted by: Tameka | October 20, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

I was saying that you would have to make a lot of money to pay for a few people making medium wage.Taking words out of context will not help your precious Marxist.I have not seen you telling YOUR side to stop calling US names.And a lot of the women I know have used language a lot stronger than mine to express their dislike of Obama.And call me a cretin again I’ll stick my foot were the sun don’t shine.
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 3:53:51 AM
Here are the tax plans side by side :
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/election_issues_matrix.cfm
The health plans side by side:
http://www.health08.org/sidebyside_results.cfm?c=5&c=16

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Go to Wikipedia and put in VX,and right there it says”UN classifies this as a Weapon of Mass Destruction”,so your side is lieing when it says we found none.And tameka,your side is the one throwing out the KKK and other accusasions.Not ours.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

“If I remember correctly the final outcome was there were no WMD’s and Bush had lied.”
———————————–
Our Intelligence Agencies did a sloppy job. Bush acted based on what the CIA (taking its information from the German Intelligence Agencies) presented to him. How does that make Bush a liar?
If Bush lied then so did Collin Powell (his speech at the UN, in 2003) – the man who just endorsed “Messiah Obama”. I said it earlier and will repeat it again: You DemocRRATS can NOT have it both ways.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Latrine Cleaner,
The women you know, who have used fouler language than yours, AREN’T ladies. Civilized people can disseminate information without resorting to foul language. Sorry to burst YOUR bubble.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

What irritates me the most about a majority of the McCain supporters is that when you ask them to show you where they got their info from most won’t do it.
If you are going to bash Obama then at least have the guts to post where you found that information.
The list of “ists” he has been called is amazing. What I find amazing about that is, they use it the same days, like they have a little leaflet that tells them what to say that day. One day everyone is calling him a socialist, the next a racist. He is none of those.
Please people do your research on these candidates from bipartisan sources. Fact check things. You would be amazed what you can learn when you open your mind.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

latrine cleaner-
Then stop throwing up that Obama is a radical and a muslim, and non- american, and a terrorist, and a baby killer, and everything else you all have been calling him.
Natasha-
Stop copying and pasting you reTARDican, lol.
Now I’m gone……..

Posted by: Tameka | October 20, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

I ain’t a cretin and calling me that is not going to help Obama.We will probably have to fight china and russia sooner or later.But hopefully that is far off and we can hope they turn democratic before then.And nobody aswered me as to how that Marxist quote and Obamas economic plan are differant.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

I guess McCain chose Palin because she is a white woman so he can pander to the white women for their votes! How about that! Does that make sense to those of you who suggest that the reason Powell endorsed Obama is because he’s black. What about the past Republican secretaries of state who endorsed McCain..did they endorsed him because he’s white like they are? I am sick of racists(Black and White). Please go away and stop attaching race to everything..Heaven help us all and save us from those Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 20, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Natasha,
Collin Powell’s endorsement for Obama is not going to change the course of this election, but one thing it is saying to (at least a few) people is that Obama is a better leader for both domestic and international issues! Even your McCain said “I respect and continue to respect and admire Secretary Powell.”

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Latrine Cleaner -
What’s the matter? Can’t type when your foot is stuck “where the sun don’t shine”?
I called you a cretin because your posts indicate that you ARE a cretin. When you can carry on a civilized conversation, let me know. I’ll be happy to educate you further.
ps – the word you wanted earlier was percentage, not percintage. LOL

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Fizzle,when some Idiot is trying to ruin your country you use whatever words at your disposal to show your displeasure.It is not my fault he has not changed his middle name,he has had over two and a half decades to do it.Since he hasn’t he must feel some attatchment to it.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

Go to Wikipedia and put in VX,and right there it says”UN classifies this as a Weapon of Mass Destruction”,so your side is lieing when it says we found none.And tameka,your side is the one throwing out the KKK and other accusasions.Not ours.
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 4:05:02 AM
It says that but if you read further:
Iraq under Saddam Hussein admitted to UNSCOM that it had researched VX, but had failed to weaponize the agent due to production failure. After U.S. and allied forces had invaded Iraq, no proof of weaponized VX was found.
Subsequent investigation after the 2003 Invasion of Iraq indicates that Iraq had indeed weaponized VX in 1988, and had dropped three VX-filled bombs on Iran

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

Latrine Cleaner,
Did you change the name YOUR parents gave you? It is a perfectly acceptable name … “A rose by any other name …”!If you weren’t such a cretin, you would know that not everyone named Hussein is an Iraqi dictator. Stop showing your ignorance. You are becoming a bore.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
We don’t want to change your mind to vote for anybody, you are a big enough to vote for whomever you believe in but to come here and compared Obama to communist/terrorist is totally insane, and that is why some people brought up the KKK and the likes. After all, McCain was and still is a good friend of G Gordon Liddy who was a Nazi and Hitler sympathizer during his younger years. So does that make McCain a potential Nazi sympathizer also?
And I doubt that we will ever attack Russia or China because they have WMDs.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Here’s some quotes from McCain about the French:
I’m as frustrated with the French, I think, as anyone, but look, there’s going to be other challenges and there are going to be other issues. As long as there’s a war on terrorism going on, we’re all going to have to work together.
John McCain
On France’s stance on Iraq, interview March 2003.
They [the French] remind me a little bit of an aging actress of the 1940s who is still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn’t have the face for it.
John McCain
On France’s stance on Iraq, February 2003.
Do you really think Sarkozy is going to be negative while he’s here?
Posted by Jwench
———————————–
BOZO- Get real… McCain made those comments about the French Socialists, who were in power in 2003. Sarkozy – a right wing conservative became President of France in 2007.
McCain was absolutely right to blast the French Socialists in 2003. It is obvious that you are as “naive” and “inept” about global geopolitical ussues as That One.
McCain has an excellent relationship with President Sarkozy – in fact both McCain has spoken very complimentary of him in numerous times.
Funny that you did not comment on EUROPE’S FAILED SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT!
If Obama is elected President his Socialist/Communist experiment in our country would fail as it did in Europe.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Called a typo D U M B A – -,made sure I had pronounciation on that just right for you.And as stated before Stanley,I do not dislike him because of race,I like Bill Cosbey just fine(And I asked this before,is he a rascist for not liking Obama),I dislike him because he wants to ruin this country.Pure and Simple.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
Okay dumbass, now you have crossed the line with me!!! Why in the world would he has to change his middle name? To please nuts like you??? Do you know how many people in this world has that middle name? It is like a ‘Smith’ or ‘Johnson’ to us here. If this is the case then many people in this country would have to change all of their names also if their names sound Arabic, German, Japanese, Italian, Spanish, Chinese etc…those were/are our enemies. See how stupid you are???

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

Latrine Cleaner,
It doesn’t appear that we have to wait for Obama to “ruin” our country. Dubya and his Right-wing Corporate-socialist friends are doing a fine job of that already. Explain to me how Obama’s plans to redistribute the wealth of this country DOWNWARD is any different from the Neocon’s practice over the past 8 years to redistribute that wealth UPWARD. You rant and rave about all of Obama’s perceived “sins”, but you don’t say anything about why you think McCain would be better.
And, for your information, despite George Bush and Company’s efforts to destroy this once great nation, I have never found it necessary to resort to foul language to express my anger and frustration with them. Any sensible response to that? (I didn’t think so.)

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

I would call YOU ignorant Fizzle,but like Reagan said “Our liberal friends are not Ignorant.They just know so much that isn’t so.”.And you are showing how much you know that isn’t so.And Wench,I saw the news when they reported that they found WEAPONIZED VX IN IRAQ!So that means they HAD WMDs.Ohh,sorry.I made you have to admit you were wrong.And Oil Slick,if he was the Left-Wing media would have already exploited it.And I guess you all are conceding that there is no differance between that Marxist quote and obamas economics plan,since none of you all have come up with a answer.And Oil Slick,I use Quaker State.

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
And yes, I am calling you a ‘dumbass’ in your face right now!!!!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

BOZO- Get real… McCain made those comments about the French Socialists, who were in power in 2003. Sarkozy – a right wing conservative became President of France in 2007.
McCain was absolutely right to blast the French Socialists in 2003. It is obvious that you are as “naive” and “inept” about global geopolitical ussues as That One.
McCain has an excellent relationship with President Sarkozy – in fact both McCain has spoken very complimentary of him in numerous times.
Funny that you did not comment on EUROPE’S FAILED SOCIALIST EXPERIMENT!
If Obama is elected President his Socialist/Communist experiment in our country would fail as it did in Europe.
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 4:29:10 AM
Did I say that he said that about Sarkozy. No I didn’t. I was posting his previous thoughts on France.
Ok, Einstein tell me how the trickle down economics you Republicans thinks works has helped us and why Obama’s plans won’t work. You seem to be the all knowing expert on everything, let’s hear it.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

Ayers, Dorn, Cone,Osama Wright,Farracan,Marx, Stalin,Oprah,PalosiJack Cafferty,Sadam Hussein,and Putin also endorses Obama.

Posted by: Michelle | October 20, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

If we have been working with the trickle down economics for the last and 8 years and it is destroying out great nation then don’t you think we should try something new??? I don’t understand you repubs!!!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am

Natasha,
Collin Powell’s endorsement for Obama is not going to change the course of this election, but one thing it is saying to (at least a few) people is that Obama is a better leader for both domestic and international issues! Even your McCain said “I respect and continue to respect and admire Secretary Powell.”
Posted by: STP
————————————
Obviously you have not read my previous comments about Collin Powell’s endoresement, earlier on this blog. Had you read them you would know how I feel about Collin Powell. The comment you are referring to was a reply to another blogger who said that Bush lied. Read it again – the point I am making is that if he believes that Bush lied then he has to believe that Powell lied as well.
Personally I do not believe that either Bush or Powell lied. They were given inaccurate information by our Intelligence Agencies, which relied too heavily on the German Intelligence reports.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Michelle,
Please tell me where I can look up the endorsements from them so I can see it for myself, otherwise you are just spreading rumors and is a liar.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am

Michelle,
Please explain how Marx, Stalin and Saddam Hussein have endorsed Obama. The last time I checked, they were all DEAD! Or have you Republicans resurrected them so that they can vote for McCain?

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 4:40:09 AM
I took that right off the page YOU gave me. Just because you say you saw it on TV doesn’t prove a thing. I looked at other sites and can’t find what you are saying is true.
As far as the Marxist thing. It doesn’t even describe what Obama wants to do.
Obama knows that the middle class drives this economy. It’s about time somebody gives us a break. Obviously the Republicans haven’t learned that yet.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

NV-Sparkle,
That’s a good one! Amen!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am

Michelle,
Please explain how Marx, Stalin and Saddam Hussein have endorsed Obama. The last time I checked, they were all DEAD! Or have you Republicans resurrected them so that they can vote for McCain?
Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 4:48:32 AM
Ah haaa. Voter Fraud by the GOP….lol

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Oil Slick,you’ll notice that none of us are making a fuss about saying his middle name.Because your side does all of it for us,tell me,if it’s so normal and A-Okay,why do you feel you have to defend it?They didn’t “Redistribute” wealth upward,they cut taxes and the upper class benifitted.What obama plans is Socialism,Communism,Marxism,Liberal Extremism(again pick whichever you like),our country was founded on the principle of hard work.And everyone seems to have forgotten that.If you do not reward hard work then they will not work at all,it is as simple as that.I am DEEPLY sorry if I offended you by being a normal american.Since I know very Gentlemanly and Laylike people who have every now and again uttered an epithet.If you are so troubled by this maybe you would prefer it in a country without free speach?

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

The Republicans continue to give the Big Oil/Wall Street/Bank’s CEOs and executives tax breaks when they are the ones that have helped to devastate our economy. It is the middle class that are hurting and need the tax breaks, not these fat cats!!!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

STP- FYI
(Posted by: Natasha | Oct 19, 2008 10:11:49 PM)…
Reply to Donna Hughes:
No my dear, in fact Powell’s endorsement would have done more harm that good to McCain for the reasons explained in my comment. I would have preferred Powell to keep quiet – not endorsing any of the two candidates.
It was the other day that feaking CNN had a special report on Powell’s speech at the UN (2003) and balsted him and our Intelligence agencies. Today, CNN is considering Powell’s endorcement of Obama as an endorcement coming form God!
You left-wing-liberals can not have it both ways. Up to now you were trashing Powell because of his UN speech – now he is GOD, hah?
I can tell you one thing for sure…Although I disagree with Powell I still respect him as a person. I have absolutely NO respect for Marxist Barack Obama.
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 19, 2008 10:11:49 PM

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

If you do not reward hard work then they will not work at all,it is as simple as thatPosted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 4:52:32 AM
So you think to keep taxing the middle class like they have is going to help the economy?
IF people don’t have the money they won’t spend it. If the don’t spend it that money doesn’t go back into the economy.
I just don’t see why you have a problem with some of the richer people paying more taxes.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

Although this has been quite an experience, I am tired of trying to educate the deaf, dumb and blind on this site. I, for one, have to work tomorrow. Good night to all.
And a special note to the cretin, Latrine Cleaner: The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech. Common decency calls for self-discipline in exercising that right. Thank you for giving thinking people so much ammunition to use in our war against bigotry and stupidity in our great country. You could serve as the poster child for No Child Left Behind. I hope that you learn to read the printed word soon, and not just what you perceive is written between the lines. They have medications now to treat Paranoia. Please consult your doctor with all haste.

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

Well I’m middle class and have been doing fine thank you very much,and would hate obamas redistribution of wealth.IT IS UN-AMERICAN AND I WILL NOT STAND FOR IT!Look up the definition of capitalism and then Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and others of that ilk.And ask anyone else on this sight and I think you will find a lot of them think that quote fits fine,besides I asked you how his plan is differant.Not if the quote fit him.And better yet,I’ll ask.How many people reading this think this quote(To each according to his need,from each according to his ability)describes the Obama economics plan?

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | Oct 20, 2008 5:01:28 AM
It was indeed a pleasure :)

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am

Latrine Cleaner -
Feel free to attack me after I’m gone. You seem to be much better at attacking others than you are at defending your own opinions. Get some sleep, too. Maybe you will think more clearly if you are rested. Good night!

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
You know something, yes we have free speech here and it is a wonderful thing. But also realize that it has its limitations also…
‘The freedom of speech is not absolute. Legal systems, and society at large, recognize limits on the freedom of speech, particularly when freedom of speech conflicts with other values or rights. Exercising freedom of speech always takes place within a context of competing values. Limitations to freedom of speech may follow the “harm principle” or the “offense principle”, for example in the case of pornography or “hate speech”. Limitations to freedom of speech may occure through legal sanction and/or social disapprobation.’
So don’t be yelling ‘FIRE’ in the theater when you are watching “W” this week when there are none, because freedom of speech can’t protect you here.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am

The Republicans continue to give the Big Oil/Wall Street/Bank’s CEOs and executives tax breaks when they are the ones that have helped to devastate our economy. It is the middle class that are hurting and need the tax breaks, not these fat cats!!!
Posted by: STP
———————————–
You are clueless. The economy was devastated because of the housing crisis, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the DemocRATS that pressed for the “affordable housing” crappy legislation. It was the Democrats that thought that there was nothing wrong with Fannie Mae amd Freddie Mac and made sure that more strict regulation did not take place. To the contrary McCain had warned and pushed for more regulation. Of course the Democrats were accepting thousands of “dollars” from Fannie Mae, etc. including Barack Obama, and that is a fact.
Go do your homework in Economics before you post comments regarding the causes of the economic crisis.
Suddenly, every Obama puppet has become an “expert” in the “economy”.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Jwench,
The pleasure was all mine! I hope to have the pleasure of your company again another time. Keep up the good work! Someday these folks might wake up and face the FACTS. I believe in the power of hope! :)

Posted by: NV-Sparkle | October 20, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

NV-Sparkle
Good night and have a great week!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

Well I’m middle class and have been doing fine thank you very much,and would hate obamas redistribution of wealth.IT IS UN-AMERICAN AND I WILL NOT STAND FOR IT!Look up the definition of capitalism and then Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and others of that ilk.And ask anyone else on this sight and I think you will find a lot of them think that quote fits fine,besides I asked you how his plan is differant.Not if the quote fit him.And better yet,I’ll ask.How many people reading this think this quote(To each according to his need,from each according to his ability)describes the Obama economics plan?
Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 | Oct 20, 2008 5:03:32 AM
Have you ever heard the expression about cutting your nose off to spite your face?
The quote has nothing to do with his plan. What part of he wants to help the middle class don’t you understand. I gave you the link to compare their plans side by side. Here it is again.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxtopics/election_issues_matrix.cfm
I am sorry but I don’t get the logic of some of you people.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Natasha,
If you believe that was the case, please take the liberty of looking at FactCheck.org and see who are to be blamed for the current crisis and maybe you will learn something today! Like I said, they are PART of the problem.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Obama Soviet Anthem: Hilarious
http://www.wikio.com/video/389423

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Good Riddance Fizzle,and Tax BREAKS are the answer,not Hikes.Obama promises a return to Clinton Taxes and higher,McCain to make the Bush tax cuts permenant,Obama to tax anyone making over 250,000(which after expenses is not very d— much),McCain to CUT TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS.Gripe gripe gripe about how the rich are making too much and McCain is proposing to give the middle class lower taxes and a lot say “No we’re going with obama because he taxes the RICH,and gives ME the money.”.Ben Franklin once said “The day the american people think they can vote themselves more money it will be the end of the republic.”.And now that’s EXACTLY what you all are trying to do.Calling me names will not change that fact.So
Obama for Latrine Cleanor ’08 signing off.I will leave you with a quote,”A man who values Privledges over Principles soon loses both.”Dwight Eisenhower.’Night All

Posted by: Obama for Latrine Cleaner '08 | October 20, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Biden’s comment is not the case. Powell, a “professing” republican appointed by Bush, is now in bed with Obama – Has he done his homework or is he racist? By homework I mean this: Obama will not produce his birth certificate in the Berg vs. Obama lawsuit – proving he is not qualified to become President. He also will not release his college or medical records, that probably have other incriminating evidence against him. He buddies with racist pastors, terrorists, and has a blatant socialist agenda – not what America is all about and what it was founded upon. Obama lies (google 155 Obama lies), has brought NO legislation as Senator, has NOT united republicans and democrats, and is so radical, he would not support assisting babies medically who survive an abortion holocaust. I am perplexed how people are drawn to the man’s fluff and theatrics, but seem to care less about what he is, what he stands for, and what is behind his facade. The new movie: HYPE should be seen by every American before this election.

Posted by: John | October 20, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

Ahahahahaha!
FactCheck.Org!
Once again, GET REAL…
Stay tuned…there is a Congressional investigation in the works (besides a separate one by the FBI…
the DemocRATS better be running for cover!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08
Good night to you also and hope that when you wake up tomorrow all refreshed you will see the light of truth. But hey, this is America, where we can choose whoever we think will best serve this country. Hopefully without resorting to rumors and dirty lies.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

John,
Thanks for joining this convesation, but most of your statements and questions have been addressed from the posts above already.

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am

Natasha,
we all welcome the investigations, and I hope that all of the parties who are guilty will pay a hefty penalty for it, I don’t care if it is the Democrats or Republicans. How about that for an unbias answer?

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am

Exposed! The Democrats’ Coverup Of The Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Crisis (Video)
A must see video of the problems created by the Democrats over the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac financial crisis. See who is really to blame for the U.S. financial meltdown.
http://stuckon-stupid.com/2008/09/28/the-democrats-coverup-of-the-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-crisis/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

Just because somebody give you an endorsement makes a person ready? You have to be kidding me right? Is this the same Liberal party saying Palin is not ready yet she has more executive experiance than Biden and Obama? Now because Powell endorsed Obama he is ready?
is this the same Colin Powell that 8 years ago the African American and Liberals wer calling an “Uncle Tom”? Funny when somebody who 8 years ago you all hated because he did not share your view you considered him a “Uncle Tom”, and now that he is supporting your side he is the greatest thing ever! I am sure Powell’s endorsment will help sure up the African American vote for Obama’s Black From 98% to 98.5.

Posted by: chuck | October 20, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

You are clueless. The economy was devastated because of the housing crisis, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the DemocRATS that pressed for the “affordable housing” crappy legislation. It was the Democrats that thought that there was nothing wrong with Fannie Mae amd Freddie Mac and made sure that more strict regulation did not take place. To the contrary McCain had warned and pushed for more regulation. Of course the Democrats were accepting thousands of “dollars” from Fannie Mae, etc. including Barack Obama, and that is a fact.
Go do your homework in Economics before you post comments regarding the causes of the economic crisis.
Suddenly, every Obama puppet has become an “expert” in the “economy”.
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 20, 2008 5:12:30 AM
Please do your homework befor you spout half truths.
McCain is just as bad.
2008 Campaign Contributions from Fannie & Freddie
John McCain- $169,000
Barack Obama- $16,000
He just got smarter after Keating. Do the names Rick Davis and Charlie Black ring a bell?
A third McCain bundler, Geffrey T. Boisi, is a director of Freddie Mac.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am

Natasha,
we all welcome the investigations, and I hope that all of the parties who are guilty will pay a hefty penalty for it, I don’t care if it is the Democrats or Republicans. How about that for an unbias answer?
Posted by: STP | Oct 20, 2008 5:39:13 AM
I agree. Neither one of these two candidates can talk about the other on this one. They are ALL responsible, both Democrat and Republican.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Natasha,
Like I have said before, there are many blames to go around. That’s why I welcome the investigations and lets get to the bottom of this mess. I am not for Democrats or Republicans, but I am for finding the truth from facts and not all this mudslinging we are seeing now. Is that okay with you?

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 5:53 am 5:53 am

I am out. All you who support Obama, fight the lies and half truths.
The rest of you please reasearch these candidates on unbiased sites and get better informed as to what the truth is.
Just because somebody says something does not make it true. Do your own research.

Posted by: Jwench | October 20, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am

Jwench,
Good night to you and don’t worry, this election is going exactly the way it should be. May the most capable candidates win!!! Good night all!

Posted by: STP | October 20, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

October 19, 2008
The Last Two Years
By Randall Hoven
The Obama/Biden ticket’s entire campaign theme is based on “the last eight years.” Maybe we should really look at “the last two years,” or the time period when both the House and the Senate were run by Democrats.
In December 2006, after six years of Bush and the last month before the Democrats took over both houses of the national legislature, a snapshot of our economy looked like this.
Unemployment stood at 4.4%.
Real GDP growth over the previous four years (under a Republican President, House and Senate) averaged 3% per year.
A gallon of regular gasoline cost $2.30.
The S&P 500 stock index stood at 1418, or 84% above its post-911 low and more than 7% higher than when Bush took office.
Every year of Bush’s Presidency, real (inflation-adjusted) disposable income per person went up. By the end of 2006, the average person was making 9% more in real terms than before Bush became President .
If you recall, that 2006 election was considered a referendum on Iraq. The people wanted change, so they threw out the Republicans and replaced them with Democrats. Welcome Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Here is how they handled Iraq once in office: Harry Reid told us that the Iraq war was “lost” and the surge was not “accomplishing anything.” Senator Obama introduced legislation that would have prevented the surge and would have taken all US troops out of Iraq by March 2008 (that would be seven months ago, as you read this) .
Were they right?
Barack Obama now admits that “the surge succeeded.” So much for that change. And as the surge succeeded, Congress’s approval ratings plummeted. The latest CBS/New York Times poll has it at 12%, well less than half of the already low level it stood at when the Republican Congress was being tossed out in 2006.
The Democratic Congress did a great job, if what you’re looking for in a Congress is continual investigation of Republicans. Did the White House out CIA agent Valerie Plame? No, it was the anti-White House Richard Armitage at State, but Congress investigated anyway. Did Alberto Gonzalez, with White House urging, fire nine prosecutors for political reasons? Probably not, and it wouldn’t be a crime anyway, but Congress investigated, and is still investigating. Did the CIA, under orders from the White House, “torture” prisoners? No evidence of that yet, but Congress is on the case.
What Congress would not investigate was anything about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, they fought against such investigations and cast aspersions against anyone who would even doubt the soundness of those institutions. Here is what Barney Frank said:
These two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.
You can also see this (video) how Democrats treated the regulators trying to reign in Fannie and Freddie.
http://vodpod.com/watch/1038839-dems-refuse-to-reform-freddie-fannie-in-2004-video
But now we know what happened. Fannie and Freddie were run corruptly and ineptly and went bankrupt. Their $1.5 trillion portfolios had to be rescued by the government this year. Franklin Raines, the Clinton-appointed CEO of Fannie Mae who was vigorously defended by Congressional Democrats, was sued by government regulators for cooking the books to the tune of $10 billion to increase his own bonuses to the tune of tens of millions. He settled his suit for an estimated $25 million.
On the other hand, here is what the New York Times had to say in 2003 .
The Bush administration is rightly pushing for the Treasury Department to regulate the two giants, along with the network of federal home loan banks. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae provide financing to lenders by creating a secondary market for mortgages. All told, these two institutions’ debt portfolio exceeds more than $1.5 trillion. Their current regulator is ill equipped to keep tabs on Freddie’s and Fannie’s sophisticated hedging strategies and the other financial moves they use to manage their huge investments.
And here is what John McCain said on the Senate floor:
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
So on the big things, the surge in Iraq and the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to our recent financial mess, the Democrats were wrong. Dead wrong. One hundred eighty degrees out wrong.
On the other hand, who supported the surge? George W. Bush and John McCain.
Who tried to strengthen the oversight and regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? George W. Bush and John McCain.
In the case of the surge, Bush and McCain got their way. The result? Apparent victory in Iraq, a country that is now a democracy, at peace with its neighbors, no longer a WMD threat, no longer a terrorist sanctuary, and no longer filling hundreds of mass graves with hundreds of thousands of its own citizens.
In the case of Fannie and Freddie, Bush and McCain did not get their way – Barney Frank did. The result? The failure of Fannie and Freddie, law suits against their executives and the spark that sent banks failing and stocks falling across the globe to the point of threatening a Great Depression.
Let’s vote for change. Let’s undo what we did in 2006.
American Thinker 2008

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

2008 Campaign Contributions from Fannie & Freddie
John McCain- $169,000
Barack Obama- $16,000
Posted by: Jwench
————————————–
Please post the sources/links of your information.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

mccain-palin supporter, why re u losing? have u asked urself for once? why is everything not working for mccain? money is not on his side, big people are not on his side, middle class are not on his side, age not on his side, his eratic judgement of picking an inexperience vp is not on his side,resources are not on his side. you know why. he is fighting with “THE CHOSEN ONE”

Posted by: dave | October 20, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am

Its funny to see the republicans arguing that Obama is a ‘socialist’ and whatnot when John McCains healthcare taxrebates will also be sent to people WHO DOESNT pay tax. Its true, look it up and you’ll see that McSame wants to ‘spread the wealth’.
A perfect example of how deeply indoctrinated the far right repukes are.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 20, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (See below)
Dodd, Christopher $116,900
Obama, Barack $120,349
McCain, John $21,550
All Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/09/18/all-recipients-of-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-campaign-contributions-1989-2008/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Obama still can’t pull away in the POLLS

Posted by: jackt51 | October 20, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

2008 Campaign Contributions from Fannie & Freddie
John McCain- $169,000
Barack Obama- $16,000
Posted by: Jwench
————————————
Hmmmm…it is the other way around, Mickey Mouse…
Here are the facts:
Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (See below)
Dodd, Christopher $116,900
Obama, Barack $120,349
McCain, John $21,550
All Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/09/18/all-recipients-of-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-campaign-contributions-1989-2008/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Obama’s ready because he’s black?

Posted by: tina | October 20, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

they call it national service, it will be called many things, it will be given different names but the fact is that POWELL and OBAMA agree that a national service is needed,which is just a fancy name for the DRAFT.
so long to ALL 18 year olds for at least 2 years of service, this will happen BEFORE your eligability to US college funds. thats right …you pay with 2 years of military service BEFORE you go off to college…and weather you go to college or not..
YOU WILL SERVE THE MANDATORY 2 YEARS in one form of national service or another

Posted by: Cracker jack | October 20, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

BUT it wont be socialism !

Posted by: Cracker jack | October 20, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

McCAIN / PALIN WILL OFFER WORSE THAN BUSH ADMINISTRATION !

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 20, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

Actually, I made a mistake in my previous list. The grand totals for the “Top 3″ Democrats are even higher!
Here are the correct grand total amounts of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008.
Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (See below)
Dodd, Christopher (D)$165,400
Obama, Barack (D)$126,349
Kerry, John (D) $111,000
McCain, John $21,550
http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/2008/09/18/all-recipients-of-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-campaign-contributions-1989-2008/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

right now of every dollar your earn you bring home around .58 cents,
under mccains program that will increase to around 59. or .60 cents.
under obama’s plan you will bring home.51 to .53 cents on the earned dollar.
WHY !

Posted by: Cracker jack | October 20, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

obama is using the Colin Powell endorsement to divert attention to his JOe the Plumber fiasco (his “Dukakis riding the tank” moment)
it makes no difference
wasn’t Powell the guy who got us into Iraq, yeah, I want his backing – what a hypocrite!
Obama still can’t pull away and he looses not due to the bradley effect but because people legitimately “do not trust him”
Mccain 286 Obama 252

Posted by: tom | October 20, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

they were calling Obama a Marxist on the McGlauflin Report last night, even close associates of Obama say he is a Marxist..He will be defeated, he will not get the chance to destroy America
Posted by: common sense
————————————-
Yes, indeed! Marxist Obama will destroy America… We will never allow America to become the land of “New Communist Experiment”. American Union (as in Soviet Unison) our land will never be.
Obama can take his “Ayers & Co. community organizing experience” and go to Russia to organize some… Siberian Gulags!
This presentation is a must watch for the left-wing-liberal media clowns and all “morally sound” American fellows.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

This is a must watch for all patriotic -morally sound American fellows.
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
AMERICA SAY NO TO OBAMA’S…
“USA: THE NEW COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

jackt51, Thats because of all the racists that will not vote for him because hes a ‘socialist’ thats a racist code for ‘n****r’. Just look at all the hate on these blogs. America should be ashamed.

Posted by: mitch | October 20, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Natasha is a stupid C**t! I should make a t shirt.

Posted by: Boris | October 20, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

At a time that Europe is awakening up – turning to the “right” after years of “failed socialism” it would be a crime to elect Marxist Obama as the next President of the United States of America.
Even France learned the lessons of its “failed socialism” and elected conservative Nicholas Sarkozy – a staunch friend of the United States. And here we are – Americans are about to let our country destroyed by MARXIST BARACK OBAMA!
The following video is for the geopolitically savvy and morally sound American patriots – not for the “Obama Communist Youth”!
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
“France’s new leader Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech before Congress that was, dare I say, almost…Reaganesque. He called America “the greatest nation,” among other platitudes.
You can view the whole thing here, and I really think you should all watch it.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.
What’s particularly interesting is that, years ago when the Bush presidency was new and Iraq was a fresh issue, the left told us constantly that George Bush was making America less popular in the world. Yet during the President’s term in office three of our traditional allies (Canada, Germany and now France) elected leaders that displaced virulently anti-Bush and anti-American leaders with people more of Sarkozy’s temperament (Stephen Harper in Canada and Angela Merkel in Germany).
Sort of almost seems like…that whole “less popular America” thing just isn’t true.”
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Natasha, Obama isnt marxist. His agenda is truly America first. Unlike McCain who puts the wealthy first. Obamas supposed redistribution will redistribute the wealth back to the people, countering Bushs redistribution of the weath to the wealthy. Bushs tax plan was socialist too. Also welfare is socialist, and that was started in the 30s. Unemployment insurance is socialist. Public schools are socialist. Public Fire Stations. Shall I go on? This country has been socialist for a long time, and nobody started complaining until a black man tried to be president, and proposed helping the common man out.

Posted by: Bobba | October 20, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

“Every time, whenever an American soldier falls somewhere in the world, I think of what the American Army did for France”*
Nicolas Sarcozy
President of France (2007 – )
*President Sarcozy’s Speech to US Congress (video)
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Boy, I see my fellow “rednecks” are out in full force today.
Yep it’s true, Powell does bring out the best and worst in us.
Some of you make me ashamed, really.
I wonder how some of you can call yourselves Americans.
You are just despicable pigs.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | October 20, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

No. Not by a longshot, not even close.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? Many say that what you won’t make the same mistakes that others have because of your sound judgement (ie, your choice of pastor). The only thing, Senator, is that there still remain many mistakes yet to be written into this planet’s history books. You won’t always have the benefit of others experience, you’ll have to leverage your own experience and you have too little on which to base your judgement. I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell, Mr. Matthews … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the morale, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them (I have a friend that is an Army Reservist. He is deploying, again, to Iraq. He has a wife, a son and a daughter. He does not serve so that he can kill children and raid villages Senator). What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Did you at least play with the little green plastic troops when you lived in Hawaii? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung mentally Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning and learning from one’s mistakes. The surge worked Senator.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have access to affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the still unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that President Obama’s, Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax rate applied against his $0.00 income.
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, high cost American jobs would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those finding themselves newly unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message your handlers have planted in you, that message you think the voters want to hear. I was laughing a bit, but if I understand you correctly, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created, were actually created or do actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that timeframe passes? Let me point this out to my fellow voters. Senator Obama wants to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time he wants to turnaround and give them a tax credit for jobs they create? Senator, or maybe I should be addressing your advisers, you do realize that the two are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job decrease/increase. If you can convince us that those are winning policies Senator Obama, then I’d suggest you save us all some trouble, sell the American voters a bridge to nowhere and retire, pen some books, give some speeches. Indeed, your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama, not by a long shot.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Suicide rate? Pick a rate Senator.

Posted by: Obama is as qualified as that squirrel in my back yard | October 20, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Birds of a feather flock together eh? No surprise in Powell endorsing Obama.
I have decided to vote for McCain/Palin in Nov.
I am a registered Democrat but I am alarmed that Obama//Biden /Pelosi/Reid have become extreme SOCIALIST LIBERALS.
I work hard for my money and DO NOT like the idea of the government taking my money and giving it to those who don’t want to work and are just waiting for government hand-outs.

Posted by: Birds of a feather | October 20, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Obama is laughable not McCain… Obama has not a shred of moral integrity. Like ABC.
ABC, I will give you a bit of advice. You are beginning to look/and sound like a trashy/gossip magazine. You are relentlessly wording your headlines against McCain and for Obama.
You are in the bottom of the barrel in journalism responsibility to report the unbiased news regarding the campaign to the American people.
You should be ashamed

Posted by: ml | October 20, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Is this the same, “shut up, the debate’s over” we got on “global warming”?
Diversity is great as long as it’s not diversity of opinion.

Posted by: reggie1298 | October 20, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Good for Powell! http://tinyurl.com/5gtlug

Posted by: Huffybike | October 20, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Of course this still calls into question Obama’s readiness. In fact, coming from a war-pusher, it makes me even more suspicious. I used to like Powell in the ’90s but he really seemed to change since then. He lied to the U.N. and the world and if he didn’t agree, he should have quit. That would have been a good stand. Now, after he’s had meetings with Obama, he feels “comfortable” enough to endorse him? And Obama embraces him? I think Obama is going to continue the wars and even escalate them. It will bankrupt the country and we will be in a huge mess.

Posted by: Ben Rogan | October 20, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

neo-con=fascist:
You are a typically dumb liberal
Democrat! Whether Ron Reagan Jr is an
independent or a Democrat, he’s Not
A Republican, Doofus, and he doesn’t
speak for his mother!
Liberal Democrat=A-Hole!

Posted by: reaganfan | October 20, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

POWELL: TOTAL RACISM. I DON’T BLAME HIM, BUT HE IS NOW CROSSED THE RACIST LINE. I SAY GOOD RIDDANCE TO UNCLE TOM.
OBAMA: ISRAEL IS NOT GOING TO BE HAPPY WITH THIS MAN IN OFFICE. IT IS NOT GOING TO HELP THE MIDDLE EAST SITUATION.
BIDEN: HE IS AN IDIOT BUT HE IS RIGHT THERE IS A WORSENING OF DAYS AHEAD. OBAMA IS GOING TO RUIN THIS COUNTRY. WE ARE GOING TO SEE REVERSE RACISM AND THE MIDDLE EAST IS GOING TO FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE WITH A RACIST MUSLIM AS OUR PRESIDENT……DO NOT CALL HIM A CHRISTIAN….WE ARE MORE RESPECTABLE IN OUR PRACTICES THAN HE IS. HE IS NO CHRISTIAN BUT A PERFECT ISLAMIC TERRORIST IDEAL…..YES CHANGE IS A COMING AND NOBODY BUT FANATICS ARE GOING TO BENEFIT……ANTI-OBAMA SUPPORTERS WATCH YOUR BACK….OBAMA HAS A LOT OF BILL AYERS IN HIS NETWORK READY TO “REHABILITATE” YOUR WAY OF THINKING…..YEAH CHANGE IS COMING WE ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE IT. ESPECIALLY MOST OF YOU FOOLS THAT VOTE FOR HIM. HE DOESN’T HAVE YOUR BACK AND YOU ARE GOING TO BE HIS STEPPING STONES. RACISM IS ALIVE AND WELL IN AMERICA….ONLY NOW IT IS REVERSE RACISM….YOU POOR STUPID SHEEP FOR barach HUSSEIN obama.

Posted by: karen | October 20, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

For those of you Obama Groupies who think that Powells endorsement helps
your candidate read this:
Powell: Iraq hiding weapons, aiding terrorists
Annan: War not inevitable
Thursday, February 6, 2003 Posted: 9:05 AM EST (1405 GMT)
——————————————————————————–
Story Tools
——————————————————————————–
KEY POINTS
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell presented as evidence against Iraq:
• Recorded conversations, satellite images and information from spies inside Iraq
•Intercept of Iraqi military officers discussing how to hide evidence of banned weapons programs from U.N. weapons inspectors
• An assertion that Saddam Hussein has banned scientists from giving interviews to inspectors
• Drawings and diagrams said to illustrate Iraqi mobile biological labs
• Assertions that Iraqi nerve gas is unaccounted for
• Images said to support the assertion that Iraq continues to pursue nuclear weapons
• Assertions that Baghdad has had high-level, long-standing links to al Qaeda
More on key points:
• Gallery
• Details
VIDEO
CNN’s Andrea Koppel reports on Powell’s U.N. presentation
PLAY VIDEO
——————————————————————————–
Powell: Iraq has given safe haven to al Qaeda terrorists
PLAY VIDEO
——————————————————————————–
U.S. intelligence gathered against Iraq presented by Powell in his address to the U. N.
PLAY VIDEO
RELATED
Gallery: Key elements of Powell’s presentation
——————————————————————————–
Interactive: Security Council member countries on Iraq
——————————————————————————–
• A detailed overview of key points in Colin Powell’s presentation
• Transcript: Powell’s presentation to the U.N.
• Transcript: Iraqi ambassador’s rebuttal
• Bush reaction: Case against Iraq ‘powerful’
• U.S. reactions: Lawmakers hope presentation will sway skeptics
• World reactions: A divided response to Powell’s presentation
• Iraqi reactions: Iraqi MP: Powell evidence ‘lies’
• Indian documents suggest Iraq violated U.N. resolutions
SPECIAL REPORT
• Interactive: Council on Iraq
• Latest: Iraq Tracker
• Explainer: Al Samoud
• Special Report: Showdown Iraq
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) — U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell used electronic intercepts, satellite photographs and other intelligence sources Wednesday in an effort to convince skeptical members of the U.N. Security Council that Iraq is actively working to deceive U.N. weapons inspectors.
“I cannot tell you everything that we know,” Powell said, with CIA Director George Tenet sitting behind him. “But what I can share with you, when combined with what all of us have learned over the years, is deeply troubling.” (Key points)
While calling Powell’s presentation strong and thorough, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan told reporters, “I still believe war is not inevitable.”
But he urged Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi leadership to fully comply with U.N. Resolution 1441 to disarm “for the sake of their own people, for the region and for world order.”
One intercept, Powell said, was between a colonel and brigadier general of Iraq’s elite Republican Guard discussing hiding a vehicle before U.N. inspectors arrived to search a site.
Powell said it indicated the Iraqi officials knew inspectors were coming and what they would be looking for. In the U.S. translation, one official is heard to say, “We have this modified vehicle. What do we say if one of them sees it?” The other official says, “I’ll come to see you in the morning. I’m worried. You all have something left.”
The other official then says, “We evacuated everything. We don’t have anything left.”
Powell called the recordings “part and parcel of a policy of evasion and deception that goes back 12 years.”
Iraqi reaction
Gen. Amir al-Saadi, the Iraqi government’s science adviser, dismissed those recordings as manufactured evidence, saying “any third-rate intelligence outfit could produce such recordings.” (More on Iraqi reaction)
Powell also showed satellite photos that he said indicated the presence of “active chemical munitions bunkers” that had been disguised.
Those were followed with photos he said illustrated the facilities had been “sanitized” before U.N. inspectors arrived.
Al-Saadi said inspectors had the same satellite imagery and performed tests to detect evidence of weapons and found nothing.
Annan said U.N. chief weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei will begin studying the information presented by Powell and will pursue “the leads that they have been given.”
Powell also gave the most detailed explanation yet of possible links between Baghdad and al Qaeda.
He said high-ranking Osama bin Laden lieutenant Abu Musab Zarqawi, who is an expert in chemical and biological weapons, led a terrorist network that had been operating freely in Iraq for more than eight months. (Full story)
Zarqawi has been linked to October’s assassination of U.S. diplomat Laurence Foley in Jordan and the alleged ricin plot that was broken up in London last month. His current whereabouts are unknown.
U.S. national security adviser Condoleezza Rice said Saddam had to know what Zarqawi was doing and she accused the Iraqi leader of being responsible for “a network that is spreading poisons throughout Europe.”
“The potential marriage of weapons of mass destruction with terrorism is everyone’s nightmare,” said Rice.
She suggested that the cost of not taking action against Iraq could be another September 11-type attack, but this time with weapons of mass destruction that could kill tens of thousands.
Iraq can do very little now to avoid confrontation, Rice said. Saddam had one final opportunity to “come completely clean” with weapons inspectors, but he wasted it by deceiving them, she said. (Full story)
Meanwhile, U.S. counterterrorism officials said Wednesday they believe there is a heightened threat of a terrorist attack on U.S. soil, partly due to concern that somebody may use a potential conflict with Iraq as a pretext. (Full story)
Security Council reacts
Mohammed Aldouri, Iraq’s ambassador to the United Nations, denied Powell’s allegations, saying they were “utterly unrelated to the truth.” (Transcript of rebuttal)
Aldouri spoke after Powell and the other members of the Security Council. (Interactive: Member nations’ positions on Iraq)
Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan called on the United Nations to allow weapons inspectors to complete their job in Iraq.
British Foreign Minister Jack Straw continued Powell’s assertion that Iraq is flagrantly flouting U.N. resolutions. Britain is the key U.S. ally in the drive to force Saddam to disarm. (Full story)
IRAQI RESPONSE
Gen. Amer al-Sa’adi, science adviser to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, said a more detailed response to Powell’s presentation would be delivered at a news conference at 8 p.m. (noon ET) Thursday.
At a lunch that followed Powell’s presentation, diplomats said he responded to the French foreign minister’s concerns about the impact war with Iraq would have on the region by saying, “I wasn’t talking about war, but about strengthening inspections.”
The diplomats said Powell also made clear to Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin that the United States is not ready to go to war immediately, and is interested in hearing France’s proposals to strengthen inspections with the added value of the evidence Powell presented.
These two couldn’t be more polar
opposites on the Iraq War!
Powell even made the case that
Al Queda was in Iraq before the
invasion!
Powell has to this day never admitted
he was wrong in supporting the policy
and he stayed until 2005 without a
peep of dissent!
This endorsement is purely racial
in nature as has been Obama’s
campaign against both Hillary Clinton
and John McCain!
People are elected president of this
country because of their qualifications,
Not Their Race!
Both Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden
said that Obama was Not Qualified to
be president! I believe them, Not
Colin Powell!

Posted by: reaganfan | October 20, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

DREAM ON CRACKER JACK.
IT IS SOCIALISM, YOU MUST BE YOUNG AND TOTAL UNFAMILIAR WITH HISTORY
HE WHO FORGETS THE PAST IS DOOMED TO REPEAT IT…………I SEE HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF..ONLY IN MY BELOVED COUNTRY..OBAMA IS A LEFT WING MUSLIM SOCIALIST. WHO COVENIENTLY PROFESSES A CHANGE TO CHRISTIANLY. OBAMA IS A CAMILLION WHO CHANGES TO FIT HIS CAUSE. WHEN HE BECOMES PRESIDENT YOU WILL THE REAL MONSTER BEHIND THE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT COLORS HE PORTRAYS.
HE IS KENYAN, BORN IN KENYA, DUPLICATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN HAWAII, RENOUNCED US CITIZEN TO BECOME A INDONESIAN MUSLIM. HE ISN’T EVEN AN AMERICAN. WAKE UP AND SEE THIS CAMILLION FOR WHAT HE IS.

Posted by: KAREN | October 20, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

AS RUSH LIMBAUGH SAYS: ISRAEL IS NOT GOING TO SEE THIS MAN NOBAMA AS A GOOD THING FOR THEIR SAFETY. THEY ARE GOING TO BECOME MORE DEFENSIVE AND YOU ARE TO SEE A LOT OF CHANGES IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
THE SKY AINT FALLEN PEOPLE BUT THE BOMBS WILL BE IF NOBAMA GET IN.DON’T LOOK TO NOBAMA TO PROVIDE WORLD SECURITY. HE WILL MAKE A PACT WITH THE DEVIL……OH WAIT I THINK HE ALREADY HAS.

Posted by: KAREN | October 20, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I READ BIDENS MESSAGE AS SAYING OBAMA IS
1.GOING TO FORCE US TO ACCEPT SOCIALISM
OR
2.FORCE US TO ACCEPT A CHANGE IN OUR STAND WITH THE MIDDLE EAST(MAINLY ISRAEL) AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE IT.
NOBAMA IS GOING TO DESTROY AMERICA.
I DO NOT TRUST AND I WILL NEVER PUT MY TRUST IN HIS DECISION. BIDEN JUST CONFIRMS MY SUSPICIOUS FEELING ABOUT OBAMA’S AGENDA FOR AMERICA…..IT ISN’T GOOD.

Posted by: TAMMY | October 20, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Why I am voting Democrat!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending MY MONEY than I would. I think when you spread the wealth around it is good for everybody! It’s Patriotic!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. All profits are evil and should be confiscated for Government Redistribution.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that MORE Government regulations and higher taxes on Business will stop Business from exporting their jobs to Countries with LESS Government regulations and lower taxes.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe terrorists should be allowed to have trials in American courts. And be able to subpoena top secret documents, soldiers, government officials, etc. to cross examine for their defense. They should have ACLU lawyers who can help intimidate Americans who serve on the juries!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe Gay Marriage should be the law of the land and will probably produce better children.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe English should not be the official language of the United States. I don’t mind pushing one for English when I use the phone.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe partial birth abortion is okay but water boarding a terrorist is disgusting.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe having a domestic terrorist like Bill Ayers as a close friend is a good thing. It allows for great relations with foreign terrorists.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe in a FREE government health care system. I believe doctors, nurses, hospitals, drug companies, etc. will gladly donate their time, products, services, facilities, etc. for FREE and that will be a better system.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe in and support trial lawyers, frivolous lawsuits and outrageous jury verdicts.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe 9/11 was an inside job to con the American people to go to war for oil.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe social security is solvent and that there is a social security lock box and I don’t believe social security is a Ponzi scheme.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe MOST AMERICANS are bitter and cling to their guns and religion. Let’s rid our country of guns and religion!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe illegal aliens deserve all the rights of ordinary Americans plus some additional rights Americans do not have.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe corporations should pay higher taxes! I believe higher taxes on business will make the price of their products and services LESS EXPENSIVE.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe groups like ACORN who register felons, drug addicts, wino’s, homeless drifters, illegal aliens, dead people, children, fictional Disney characters, etc. makes my vote count more.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe celebrating the winter solstice shows compassion for the small minority of people that do not celebrate Christmas.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe hard core criminal murders and rapists deserve life and that the innocent unborn deserve death. It’s a choice I can live with.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe Bush caused Hurricane Katrina and he blew-up the levies in the ninth ward of New Orleans.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that any one who is not partaking in one of the many wonderful government programs obviously has too much money and should pay higher taxes.
I’m voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq the terrorists will be happy and now think of us as good people.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe our soldiers are AIR RAIDING villages and killing innocent people. We should all wear a bracelet.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe sex in the Oval Office with an intern is a private matter and that everybody lies under oath about sex.
I’m votin Demokrat becuse I wus edumkated at a publick sckrool. I lik da Natsionel Edukatshun Assoseeashun!
I’m voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as it does not offend people. Can’t we all just get along?
I’m voting Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits are wrong. I believe higher taxes on oil companies will produce lower prices at the pump.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe we need to rid ourselves of dependency on foreign oil, BUT I AM AGAINST offshore drilling for oil and natural gas, drilling in Anwar, building nuclear power plants and clean coal technology.
And finally, I’m voting Democrat because I believe Reverend Wright when he said “GODDAMN AMERICA” and “OUR CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST”. Hey let’s make a comfortable nest for those chickens!
Why are you voting Democrat?

Posted by: Average American Mom | October 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Well said American Mom
I want my hard earned paycheck given to people who deserve it more than me, mr.doesn’t want to work, ms.I want welfare to support me and my 5 illigetimate kids. I want to work hard for someone else to spend my money…..I don’t care if they pry it from my warm dead fingers..to give to those people. rock on spread my wealth around….it’s the patriotic thing to do….right Mr. Biden

Posted by: stacy | October 20, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Even if I knew nothing about the two candidates, choosing one to support would be easy judging by the type of people on each side. The McCain fans are consistently aggressive, racist, vicious, dishonest and low intelligence.
Obama / Biden ’08 + ’12.

Posted by: Malc | October 20, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Hey liberals, when are you going to learn that you cant punish or scare a company into doing business in your country? You claim Mcain isnt supporting America because he supports tax breaks to companies that export our jobs oversees. Come on. Its not like hes saying oh thanks so much for taking our jobs somewhere else, heres some money. Hes saying i understand that its really expensive to do business in America right now, how bout if I give you a tax break and your expenses go down, maybe you can afford to keep jobs here, or even come back. How is this so hard to understand?
Companies will do business in the cheapest place possible to do business. You cant say hey, you should stay here, even though you are going to pay significantly higher corporate taxes here, because if you leave we are going to punish you. Everyone will leave! Thats why low corporate taxes and low regulation are critical to keeping jobs here.
Look at Michigan(where I live), our corporate taxes are huge, and you have to wade through regulations to do anything. And look! all our businesses are failing and going to other states where its cheaper to do business and our economy is terrible. Why would global economics be any different?
Please USA, dont be like Michigan. Dont try to tax your way out of an economic slump, and dont regulate yourself into a recession. And Americans, take an econimics or a business course please before you jump to conclusions when you hear “Mcain is giving tax breaks to companies that send jobs oversees”

Posted by: AarontheBaron | October 20, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Tameka wrote: “…What religion do you follow? Are you really an american? What college did you attend? Where is your birth certificate?……See how malicious you sound? That is the type of attitude that is corrupting america….blah blah blah”
Posted by: Tameka
——————————–
Obama Puppet- Please stop the “melodrama”. Neither you nor I are running to become President of the United States of America – That One is!
Both you and I have the right to post any question we want and expect honest answers by anyone who decides to become President of this great country of ours. Please stop diverting form the real issue, which is Obama’s credentials (experience), character and judgement – not mine or yours (and I repeat – neither you nor I are running for President – Obama is)
So-
I have the fundamental right as you do to ask questions about Obama’s experience, his political ideology, his character and judgement.
You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. At the same time I have the same fundamental right as you do to freely express my opinion and neither you or anyone else here or elsewhere can take that right away from me or anyone else just because you and your “comrades” want to supress legitimate questions regarding someone who is running to become our Commander in Chief.
Stop the “divertion” tactic to avoid exposing the real Obama.
Btw, why is it that Obama is refusing to release his medical records like McCain has already done? Or did you conveniently missed the “special investigative report” that CNN aired two weeks ago?
Oh! I know…perhaps Obama is hidding some frequent visits to a “psychiatrist” but a possible “mental disorder” is far less important to you and the far-left-wing-liberal media clowns than having “skin cancer”.
What is Obama hidding? Perhaps a mental disorder? Oh! I know… we can not aske the “Chosen One” such questions…
Fellow Americans – keep asking the questions and demand honest answers from Obama – “God’s Gift to America” per Bela Pelosi!
Fellow Americans – demand that Barack Obama releases his MEDICAL records!
Hey BOZO – you mentioned “birth certificate above” as if it is not required from anyone running to become President…Guess what BOZO…it does! Go read our Constitution.

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Natasha, Obama isnt marxist. His agenda is truly America first.
Posted by Bobba
—————————————
Obama’s political ideology is shaped by the “Carl Marx Doctrine” – do you even know what that is?
You are deeply confused my friend. McCain’s agenda is truly America first.
Obama’s agenda is truly his “Big Ego” first. (common characteristic among Marxist leaders).

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

“From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.”
Carl Marx.
Hmmm, it sounds faniliar…
just like That One!

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

What are these things that Biden says Obama is planning on doing that they’re not telling anyone about? “We’re going to have to do things that you think are completely wrong, and go against your gut, but you have to trust us, I mean, don’t question us, just stick with us through this and it is going to be better in the end.” Makes me feel like a victim in the SAW movies… “we’re going to have to take your kidneys to sell them to someone else, but don’t worry, we’ll leave you in a bathtub full of ice and we’ll call the paramedics on the way out.”

Posted by: SBrady | October 20, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

When Biden says President Kennedy, I think Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis. Young president trying to show the world he has big enough balls makes all of us nuclear fall-out.

Posted by: SBrady | October 20, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Obama the magic negro is going to prison.
I’m Tony Rezko and I approve this message.

Posted by: Rezko | October 20, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

What are these things that Biden says Obama is planning on doing that they’re not telling anyone about? “We’re going to have to do things that you think are completely wrong, and go against your gut, but you have to trust us, I mean, don’t question us, just stick with us through this and it is going to be better in the end.”
Posted by SBrady
————————————-
SBrady, when did Joe Biden say all this nonsense?
Sorry, I missed the show…ekhm, the “talking parrot” I meant to say….. :-)

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Michelle is one ugly ass, angry militant racist gorilla, dontcha think?
ugggghh, go back to Kenya b*tch!

Posted by: MONKEY HOUSE | October 20, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

If Obama looked like JFK, this would not even be a contest.
Posted by: Concerned American
—————————————
Hey Dummie-
You may act smart, but are you really dumb? The trick questions in this test will expose your true dumbness. Take the dumb test and find out if you’re dumb!….. :-)
http://www.quizrocket.com/dumb-test/1?tr=Take%20the%20DUMB%20TEST!&tr=Hey%20Dummy!!!!!&trt=9&gatherer_id=100522&utm_source=ValueClick&utm_medium=Pop&utm_campaign=DumbTestR1

Posted by: Natasha | October 20, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Colin Powell’s worst assessment for the security of this country was in the first gulf war when he was the joint chief of the armed services, just when General Schwartzkoff and his army had Sadam Hussein and his regime outflanked and defeated, he recommended to President George Herbert Walker Bush for Saddam to live and his regime to stay in power which in turn gave us a greater threat for our current President to go before the UN and with UN forces invaded Iraq for not complying with the UN resolutions to inspect for weapons of mass destruction. I personally blame Colin Powell and his judgement for the lives and the cost for having to go back to Iraq today, and I believe his assessment and judgement for endorsing Obama as a leader of this country and the free world is wrong and if elected Obama and his left wing socialist regime could be a bigger threat to the security of this country.

Posted by: MIKEOKC,OK | October 20, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

The 10 Biggest Differences Between Obama and McCain That Will Affect Your Daily Life
AlterNet. Posted October 17, 2008.
The next president will influence everything from your Internet access to your ability to pay medical bills.
http://www.alternet.org/election08/103387/the_10_biggest_differences_between_obama_and_mccain_that_will_affect_your_daily_life/

Posted by: Sarah | October 20, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Hey Republican voters – here in Australia we can not believe how you intelligence is continuely insulted by your own party.
Let me ask you: Are you actually a part of the top 5% wealthy elite in America, that John McCains is fighting for?
Or are you one of the under-educated masses (by that I mean a lack of ability to think objectively & analyze information), that McSame thinks are stupid enough to put him & his cronies back in power?
Obama is NOT SOCIALIST. I would call the republican actions of GIVING BILLIONS away, more socialist – it’s just that they prefer to give BILLIONS to the WEALTHY.
The REPULICAN party always PRIVATIZES THE WEALTH AND ‘SOCIALIZES’ THE DEBT!!!!
DO YOU REALLY THINK IT’S EASIER NOT TO THINK BEYOND YOUR BIASES AND BE SCREWED OVER YET AGAIN?
You have a chance to have a BRIILIANT man as your President – TAKE IT!

Posted by: Maya | October 21, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Did you know our economy is doing poorly? Did you know the US has lost respect in the world? Isn’t it getting old?..and..why do some republicans buy into all this fear talk? ..and aren’t ya’all tired of friends/family without jobs or lower wages or foreclosed homes? It really IS pretty bad out there! Ultimately the blame for this rests on the Bush Admin! Psst…McCain agrees with (voted for) Bush 95%! I’ve seen little evidence of the evoltion of McCain..have you? honestly!

Posted by: yeah | October 24, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

call the holy spirit…u.s.a…Between right and wrong…
My nation The road is clear in my land And the sky light to show the way At night or Day
Everything is clear and truth in the sky flying Despite the proliferation of dark ideas From the corrupt conscience History Found Who are we to know Found To record everything And remember Mistakes And to prevent recurrence Mistakes 8 years and lose again…
yes JOHN Series of lies and false charges No longer useful Now the policy of intimidation
The Cuban missile crisis John no no no Earth calm The Net sky O soldier Life is not wars of blood and bullets Or you are not benefiting from the prison The difficult period of your life Do you seek to spread the war on land Or you should complete the film by war hero and Bush You Security Security Security Why did Bush Led the world To the phony war The war against terrorism This is strange Osama bin Laden from America, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and received material support, military exercises and security of these two countries and even received military training from the CIA But Osama wanted to build a state oil and it is the owner Which were rejected by governments above And then stole his money It became angry men The peoples were victims of this outrage Bush said he approached the capture of Osama bin Aladen But Bush loves to play The exploitation of fear the nation And the world To continue in that game bad Will not astonishment If found Bush accompanied by Osama bin Aladen In a restaurant in the U.S
How Saddam Hussein discovered underground Did not find Osama bin Aladen Which is above ground …War on Iraq Union fear of Saddam with Osama And control of oil…
yes JOHN Vincent Pogliossi former U.S. counsel Record some of the most important statements that later proved false on the war on Iraq…
12/9/2002 Bush was in the United Nations that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and the only way to ensure this is to use…
7/10/2002 in Ohio, Bush said that Saddam Hussein was a threat to peace and must be stripped of weapons, so as not to threaten America or the world…
30/1/2003 in, “Bush said in his State of the Union that the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought to buy uranium from Niger…
said that U.S. intelligence agencies and others found that Saddam Hussein produced and conceal some of the most dangerous weapons of mass destruction…
On 19/3/2003, declaring war, Bush said: «The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not accept to live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass destruction…
Is a reminder that the report of the Senate Intelligence Committee issued in 2004 said that the intelligence conclusions in the report of the National Intelligence in October (October) 2002 in the deep appreciation of the information or evidence not assigned…
Pogliossi record that the national report, despite weakness overestimated and did not stop management, reducing the possibility to certainty in what is known as the «white paper…
Distributed by the Bush administration in 4/10/2002,…
Report says: «We appreciate that Iraq is continuing programs of weapons of mass destruction in defiance of international resolutions …» became phrase in the white paper «Iraq continues…
Report says: «unlikely that Iraq has begun production of chemical weapons, mustard, sarin and VX Ji F», and the white paper says: «… Baghdad has started»To sure…
Report says: «with the fact that we have little specific information on Iraq’s chemical weapons stockpile, the most likely that Saddam Hussein had a hundred metric tons …», The white paper says:« tip that Saddam Hussein »delete the recognition of the lack of information…
Report says: «unlikely that Iraq had lethal biological weapons» … The paper says: «Iraq has…
objection of intelligence and research at the State Department to claim that Iraq continues its nuclear program , As well as the rejection of the Ministries of Foreign Affairs and the energy that aluminum tubes nuclear program, and such a claim to purchase uranium from Niger.
And narrowed our place, and there is a chapter on the failure of the war on terrorism, and how it led to the increase in terrorism around the world…
Vincent Pogliossi Thank you To tell the truth…
Yes John You want to complete the road Cuban weapons crisis People opposed the Iraq war You do not Soldiers who Deceived in this war
John Vote more than ten times against laws aimed to increase funding for shielding armor used by soldiers
Even voted against the laws of health care for soldiers…Series of lies and hypocrisy of uncleared continuous You are not clear and contradictory ideas Evasion give solutions The publication of lies and corrupt black thoughts …
You say that I think Wall Street is behind the crisis loans You and Sarah The cause of the crisis because lying And spreading fear in the hearts of the people This is the truth…
You say I issued a warning to people in Washington Who are not doing something The sowing of funds Those who think Themselves first and their country This applies you You Wearing Italian shoes Vergamo Rifatyo The price exceeds U.S. $ 520 The preferred The product of the countryU.S.A …
Has 13Car Including two non-American type “Honda” Japanese and “Volkswagen” German
This contrasts to reveal previously told John on having American-made cars only Obama, owner of one car, the “Iescaib Haiberd” produced by Ford Motor of America…
John You contradictory john love this country very much…
Sarah I tell you, congratulations You are skilled in lying Within it and a new guest Sarah representative People do not need to lie your representative The reason is lying Not licked the tears of orphans soldier Does not fill the hungry belly Does not fill in the impoverished enclave Does not impose new rights Does not impose new law Everyone needs to change We need to Obama…
You are a strong supporter of drilling for oil exploration in parts of northwest Alaska in the protected Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife did not exceed the limit and you exceeded all limits You belong to the Alaska Independence Party, which sought the same day to a vote on the independence of U.S. state…you Mass destruction…
O people of roads and clear Clear and clear…
holy spirit
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/ 1200

Posted by: holy spirit | October 28, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

call the holy spirit…John McCain…The collapse of the economy
yes john You are the reason collapse of the global economy, not just the U.S. People fear
Of psychological factors creating the negative impact of the crisis To the country and the rest of the world The poor victim Why do the poor of this world The high prices of basic materials diet High oil prices because of the owner of oil But the current crisis now Discover it all mistakes
High oil prices returned to their original owners devastation Necessity is the mother of invention Non-oil dependence the search for alternative …Congratulations Was punishment from God Self-interest and selfishness and spread hatred This is the result john yes Congratulations The fight against terrorism Now planting The seeds of terrorism Tension of living conditions Contribute much to the creation of intellectual extremism and insurgency for the individual Against social entity And expand the circle Social differences And the breakdown in humanity Age era Modern human
Instead of invention and innovation arms against the unknown Earth angry and Angry sky
Nature angry Life angry Human victim of ideas and mistakes But there is a chance to change obama yes obama Both know the story obama Is the president Congratulations, Mr
You are the winner Honesty, love and change And wisdom Is felt by the people to When speaking, when people look to you and Factors helping you succeed Congratulations to you and u.s.a and World……………….
o Lord ask you to change change and victory..
O Lord, ask you to publish love In the sky and the earth In the sea and land In human life To be a panacea for the hearts and minds
The love that fit mistakes Unite the hearts and minds Because the spirit of one And one Lord….amin
holy spirit
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/ 1200

Posted by: holy spirit | October 28, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

call the holy spirit…u.s.a…Real origin of the universe The basis of the spirit(yes Obama terrorist) Mr. President Allow me to speak on your behalf Yes, I’m a terrorist Because the opposition to meet the challenge in Afghanistan Ticket for a moment When President Bush said during Elections 2004 Approached the arrest of Osama bin Laden Lying lying Only to win again Housing fear the hearts of the people But the Bush exploited this fear to war false yes Sara yes john The war on terrorism Are we can to eradicate this phenomenon yes Deficit Why Because it is a game For oil It is not for the security of people… yes john Reduce taxes on the wealthy The giant companies And vice versa all this at the expense of the poor and owners of small Projects of low-income earners At the expense of future generations And where the money goes Spent on the war that is killing innocent people The sons of your country And other innocent 10billion in the price of war on Iraq Month Instead of allocating the money for health care There are children did not know the meaning of taste chocolate Because of serious illness or are in need of organ such as heart But the price beyond the capacity of family Do you leave the child to death Why That the world of tomorrow Has ideas Not owned by other… Yes, I’m a terrorist ms Sarah and John to escape from a creative ideas and solutions Through Accused of terrorism and the creation of ideas Black ideas That he created an economic crisis History repeats itself The world has witnessed an economic crisis of 1929 prompted major elements of violence Capitalist system The economic crisis began on Wall Street City New York on 24 October 1929 after a 19 million shares For sale in one go by speculation bringing supply than demand Fanahart value of the shares, P capitalists inability to pay debts P bankrupt banks and many industrial enterprises were closed down as deficit Peasants were forced to pay the debts of United States of America was forced to withdraw the cash-strapped Investing abroad and stopped subsidies in some countries, the crisis has taken European industrial countries and linked by the European economy The crisis has spread to countries Fmst colonies all over the world, not Escape from the crisis of the Soviet Union only isolation from the world Pursuing a socialist capitalist system Banking institutions were damaged and collapsed agricultural production And industrial by lower prices and lower consumption P International trade, and spread misery and increasing numbers of unemployed Rural migration and proliferation. * Become the economic policy of industrialized countries combined Liberalism and state intervention to guide economic life and solve their problems The crisis has revived after the application of the colonial conflicts States The industrial policy of protectionism for the economy Was the reduction of the value of the currency to encourage exports, have been reduced Working hours with the freezing of prices and the implementation of the policy of self-sufficiency Some States have adopted the colonies to address the crisis and adopted Other military industries. * U.S. President Roosevelt adopted a «new plan» Year 1933 In the face of crisis, where banks have been organized and control institutions Financial and support farmers with the reform of the industry relief Competition and minimum wage The economic crisis put an end to the prosperity of the capitalist economy Liberal prevailing since 19 century, and revived international conflicts, paving the The second world war Only remind you of history Policy and the economy Used by the country Leaves an impact on the rest of the world stop Lie And the creation of permanence hide the truth from the people… What solutions Policy distortion 490billion U.S. dollars budget deficit next year and 9.5Tlerionat Public debt Where we walk… Jailed… It s People Did not find love Opportunity to prove itself Everyone has something Characteristic owned by other Because of selfishness and a lack of interest of the people Create robbers Because of the prevailing policy Why not ask for stealing To live with dignity And children being fed Kill others in order to live…Give solutions to this category After serving as part of the punishment Swaps as behavior To get a free and opportunity in this life Get a college degree through which it provides everything a new community Reconciliation Decade With oneself and others, environmental All the spirit of Wahda Yes, I’m a terrorist Gun Bomb change … Yes, I’m a terrorist… yes savage im a terrorist Only because of the terrorist friend Outbreak Civil war Because In the case of winning the President Did you know that each of the people voted for me Obama Love from the heart to heart The love that united It is a victory For all kinds of racism On different creed, religion, color Your message Dissemination of love Guidance Tell the truth Lighting in the darkness Or you do not see 8years Last… Yes, I’m a terrorist John and Sarah He said the ordinary Because the Represent the people I’m sick and I need to change To heal… I am poor and I need to change I forget to hunger and deprivation… I am woman I need to change Get the rights to the best… I am the child I need to change I know the taste of chocolate Open the book and stories I find Good victory… I am a student I need to change So as not to lose For which future study An opportunity for me to find myself discovered… I am soldier I need to change If fought for my country and honor not war False and unfair for me to the Geyer Conscience or cause suffering to me … I am the artist I need to change To expel grief And I am trying to spread Happiness and joy… I media I need to change To spread the facts Without restrictions Or mislead and Free… I’m retired I need to change I feel proud Because of new rights A new law Protects the right to live Dignity… Im Jailed I need to change and love Because the new live Block and others to do what he did…………………………………. Holy Spirit I’m People Life was very hard with And very difficult So far Because telling the truth Letter to life The right to say Peace prevails Many torment him My brother, my sister Do not want you Suffer or deny or savor the taste of life in harsh I am an example We pray all Despite the different religions And beliefs and colors Because We are one spirit God The one… So that peace can prevail And spread love The spread right And enjoy the conscience Choose to be chosen obama And we protect you Until victory Love from the heart to heart….Amin
yes u .s.a yes change yes obama yes live
holy spirit

Posted by: holy spirit | October 28, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.