By Lindsey Ellerson

Oct 21, 2008 6:09pm

Big Labor Robocall: ‘John McCain Has Gotten Us Into This Economic Crisis’

The AFL-CIO’s "Working America" is running a robocall attacking Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in battleground states Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Talking Points Memo reports.

"Hi, this is Sue with an important message from Working America about the current economic crisis," says the call. "You should have just received a piece of mail from us, explaining how Republican Sen. John McCain’s economic policies have been a disaster for the middle class.  John McCain has gotten us into this economic crisis.  He supported sending our jobs overseas, and he supported getting rid of the rules for the fat cats on Wall Street.  In the meantime, he has done nothing to help struggling families on Main Street.  Now he wants to continue the same failed policies.  Working families can’t afford four more years of this.  Please join me in voting against John McCain on Nov. 4.  Thank you for your time."

John McCain has gotten us into this economic crisis? That’s so spurious I don’t even know where to start.

- jpt

User Comments

John McCain is fine with robocalls.
Good for the goose and all that jazz.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

What?! Has McCain been President before?
Anyway, let’s hope he’ll never be it AGAIN.
Or at all.

Posted by: poof | October 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

jpt writes:
“John McCain has gotten us into this economic crisis? That’s so spurious I don’t even know where to start.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 21, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

But Jake, McCain has been palling around with unrepentant deregulators Phil Gramm, Jack Kemp, et. al.
And I think I saw him many times on TV being very affectionate with George Bush. After all that he loves all George Bush’s monetary and tax policies.
So, maybe they just left off a couple of ‘and’s’ in there.
Just like my mom used to say, If you play with matches…

Posted by: Bud | October 21, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

“And go on to how the craven Obama voted FOR the “bailout”.”
So did McCain.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

HA-HA what goes around comes around…..

Posted by: NH voter | October 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Thanks for printing the text, because I hang up when I get those calls.

Posted by: Mack | October 21, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

“And go on to how the craven Obama voted FOR the “bailout”.”
So did McCain.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 21, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Don’t think so. I work for a regulatory agency and saw it first hand. It’s true that the Bush administration has stood for light regulation of capital markets. But it did not invent this approach. By the middle of the last decade, experts across the spectrum believed that U.S. financial institutions faced outmoded restraints on their ability to innovate. Thus, the Clinton administration, supported by then-Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, refused to tighten regulations on financial derivatives, memorably dubbed “financial weapons of mass destruction” by Warren Buffett. The 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, a Depression-era law separating commercial banking and investment banking, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton. Barney Frank and Frankin Raines were the primary blame. FNma policies coerced banks into making subprime loans or prime loans would not be guarantee. They wanted to increase home ownership regardless if someone could afford it. They packaged the loans as securities and sold them on Wall Street. The pools got too saturated with bad loans. Obama as an attorney for Acorn punished banks with lawsuits houlding up branch applications unless they located in downtrodded neighborhoods.

Posted by: jamesferrel | October 21, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and the mainstream media slammed Sen. McCain for running robo-calls. I wonder if they intend on slamming the AFL-CIO for running robo-calls.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 21, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

It was the Democrats, the minorities and groups supporting both that pressured for the sub-prime mortgages that got us into this crises. They all believed that home ownership should be a right, even though these people could not afford the houses. One woman with 3 kids in Georgia moved into a $215,000 new home. She was making $1,300 take home pay each month. She lost the house and there are a million just like her. There is enough blame to go around but the Democrats are 80% responsible and the Republicans had to do the bail-out. If Obama is elected, our economy will not improved very much. Higher taxes on those who create jobs is not the way to go.

Posted by: Mary | October 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Juan McCain say’s the economy is solid, his buddy Phil Gram say’s American’s are a bunch of whinner’s. Whose whining now McCain ?
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | October 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

“I ain’t no “right winger” — I’m an FDR Democrat who voted for”
One who had to be told the costume made more sense if you were a Nader voter vs McCain.
The lesson for the day? Right wingers like to pretend.

Posted by: Terry Bollea (Ryan C) | October 21, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Damn…my one post joke has run amok!

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

“Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and the mainstream media slammed Sen. McCain for running robo-calls”
No McCain was slammed because in 2000, he decried robo calls by vicious firm. In 2008 he hires that vicious firm (which smeared his own daughter) to make robo calls.
Hypocrisy thy name is McCain.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and the mainstream media slammed Sen. McCain for running robo-calls. I wonder if they intend on slamming the AFL-CIO for running robo-calls.
Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | Oct 21, 2008 6:35:53 PM
There is a difference. They are not calling McCain a baby killer or somebody who palls around with terrorists. They are hitting back with real issues.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

obama without dirtying his hands
has his wittle wobots winging up the phones and telling lies about mcCain to those who answer.
one of the lies obama doesn’t let you in on is that many of the original wobots were ALSO under his payroll.
in fact, if you’re looking for a man who denies any associations which might prove politically incorrect, who ignores any harm which might be done others so long as it eases his way up the laddeer, who talks out of both sides of his mouth (as in the too many race speeches about Jeremiah), who is always innocent in the eyes of his followers even when found to be outrageously guilty…..
IF YOU’RE looking for a man whose ego is higher than the Empire State Building and broader than the Mississippi river…..whose greed for reknown is unsatiable, and whose love for the country is questionable….
vote for B O.
B U T……..
don’t forget the deodorant

Posted by: Meshachabednogo | October 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

John McCain is a deregulator. There is a regulation in the books, it’s called the Community Reinvestment Act. What it does is require commercial banks to make sub-prime loans, which Sen. Obama calls a “good idea.” The purpose of the sub-prime loan is to get people who can’t afford a house to have a house, subsidized by prime borrowers who will repay their loans, of course… “spread the wealth around,” if you will. Sen. McCain wanted to rein these things in in S.190 of 2005.

Posted by: Clintonites for McCain | October 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Greenspan, the Federal Reserve, preditory lending, greedy businessmen, dumb populace taking out loans they can’t afford are all to blame. Blaming McCain, Bush or Obama is ludicrous.

Posted by: Huh | October 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Slandering someone by saying they associate with terrorists and hate America is a hell of a lot worse than what is being said in these robo-calls. McCain is a Republicans and thus part of the problem. His policies, which are Republican Policies, led to this economic crisis so its easy to see a connection there. You don’t attack McCain for his Racist attacks on Obama yet you get your panties in a twist over this.

Posted by: Rick | October 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

which party did this? Why?
We need to dig into this.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | October 21, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Tonight Obama reached his highest point in the RCP Average of national polls so far!!!!
It’s an average of 50,3 – against 43,1 for McCain.
WOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
And it will go higher tonight, for this doesn’t yet include the new Wall Street Journal poll, released today:
Obama 52 – McCain 42
The gap is widening! Less than 2 weeks to go!
Wooooooohoooooooooooooooooo!

Posted by: Excellent News | October 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Oh, I see, two wrongs make a right…even if it is total BS. This is an utter fabrication, thanks for putting the lie to Obama’s “inclusive” and soaring campaign tactics…
At least McCain’s are true about Ayers. Obama has been less than forthcoiming and even if no one cares, it matters.
Remember the hell GWB had to pay for stopping by Bob Jones U ONCE? Obama hangs with Ayers for years (yes, he did…) and everyone is a racist for pointing out that maaaaybe Obama should not be spending time with the “guy from his neighborhood…”

Posted by: Wade | October 21, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“The purpose of the sub-prime loan is to get people who can’t afford a house to have a house, subsidized by prime borrowers who will repay their loans, of course… “spread the wealth around,” if you will.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 21, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Huh
It is de-regulation that got us into this mess and McCain once called himself the master of de-regulation. In fact he spent his whole 26 years in congress calling for it.
Another god father of de-regulation is Phil Gramm, McCain`s chief economic adviser. The same man that called us a `nation of whiners`.

Posted by: keith | October 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Slandering someone by saying they associate with terrorists”
It’s not slander if it’s true.
Posted by: Concerned in OH | Oct 21, 2008 7:02:08 PM
Only if you listen to Hannity, Fox and Limbaugh.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

The more you bash Obama with untruths, the more he rises in the polls. People are not falling for the bs that they did 8 years ago.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Concerned in OH: “”Slandering someone by saying they associate with terrorists”
It’s not slander if it’s true.”
Correct, but totally irrelevant, because it’s NOT true.
If it was true, you’d be able to name multiple terrorists Obama has associated with. Can you? Didn’t think so.
Heck, you have to rely on saying “once a terrorist, always a terrorist” to even get one (Ayers), to get around the fact that he’s a college professor now, not a terrorist.
Sheesh. Give it up already.

Posted by: Aengil | October 21, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Hey concerned in OH.
Remember the Gallup poll you were giddy about last week based on traditional likely voters?
Obama is now up 7 in that poll.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Ha! Rock em sock em robots!
My money’s on the blue robot!

Posted by: blip | October 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Okay, those with too little sense are on here spreading nonsense about the mortgage crisis, illuminating their complete and utter ignorance.
What did the mortgage industry in was speculation. Speculation on lending and speculation on buying houses. You could go into any major city and real estate brokers were giving seminars on how to buy 10 homes in 10 different cities as investments in creating cash flow.
Too many people bought houses and the peak of the market and then stopped paying mortgages after their home values dropped and there was no way for them to flip or sell the homes without a loss.
Sub-prime loans were only a small part. Most of it was A rated loans going south.
And as far as the C.R.A. goes, that was a 1977 law that was enacted to prevent discriminatory lending. It makes no mention of prime or sub-prime lending. No one forced anyone to go into subprime lending. Here are the law’s main provisions:
SEC. 802. (a) The Congress finds that–
(1) regulated financial institutions are required by law to demonstrate that their deposit facilities serve the convenience and needs of the communities in which they are chartered to do business;
(2) the convenience and needs of communities include the need for credit services as well as deposit services; and
(3) regulated financial institutions have continuing and affirmative obligation to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are chartered.
(b) It is the purpose of this title to require each appropriate Federal financial supervisory agency to use its authority when examining financial institutions, to encourage such institutions to help meet the credit needs of the local communities in which they are chartered consistent with the safe and sound operation of such institutions.
This has nothing to do with anything.

Posted by: Bud | October 21, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

This weekend, McCain told FOX News Sunday’s Chris Wallace that Obama’s words embodied “one of the tenets of socialism.” At a rally today, McCain said that his opponent’s plan is based in “redistributing wealth, not in policies that grow our economy and create jobs and opportunities for all Americans.” And his running mate Sarah Palin took issue this week with Obama’s tax hikes on “hard working families” and small business owners, calling it “another government giveaway.”
But McCain has not always been such a vocal champion of slashed tax rates for wealthier Americans.
It’s well documented that McCain’s full-throated support of cuts for those in the top tax brackets represents something of a reversal since 2001, when he voted against Bush-backed tax slashes for top earners. “I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief,” he wrote in a statement at the time.
But archived MSNBC videotape from 2000 further demonstrates how McCain’s tone has shifted on taxes and what constitutes socialism since the end of his last presidential race. Answering questions during a Hardball College Tour show in October 2000, McCain defended the progressive tax system when questioned by a town hall participant who warned that the high tax bracket of her father – a doctor – smacked of an inching towards “socialism and stuff.” McCain said that progressive tax systems are based on the fact that “we feel, obviously, that wealthy people can afford more.” He spelled out this response: “Here’s what I really believe, that when you are — reach a certain level of comfort, there’s nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.”

Posted by: Ryan C | October 21, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Sarah Palin, can you say “misappropriation of state funds”?
I didn’t think so, look it up right after you look up who’s in charge of the senate.

Posted by: JR | October 21, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Good call NH Voter. And this time the robo-calls are attacking McCain on issues instead of non-sense Joe McCarthy era smears and fears.

Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Palin still thinks Freddie Mac had his own sitcom.

Posted by: Blip | October 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Aengil,
Bill Ayers’ wife claimed credit for bombing the Murtagh’s house in NY.
That would make her a terrorist as well.

Posted by: RJ | October 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Honesty can never be found in Zero.
It is he who ridiculed Hillary Clinton’s economic plan to target banking and mortgage meltdown, one freeking year ago. Now, he accuses someone else.

Posted by: d0 | October 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Now … will Joe Biden call for these calls to end? … I don’t think so …

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | October 21, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Aengil,
Is this enough names to start with??
candidate’s pastor met with
global terrorist Mohmmar Gaddafi in Libya
endorsed by every
Muslim terrorist organization on Earth
George Soros (including a brief file on the
Soros ‘Open Society Institute’
personal associations since
childhood have been mostly with radical African
Americans, Muslims, and communists; those who harbor
anger towards The United States of America
close associations with
Muslim groups
find
one particularly disturbing passage in one of his books.: ‘Should the political
winds shift in an ugly direction I will side with
the Muslims.’
has terrorist organization
‘Nations of Islam’ employees on his current staff,
and one of his advisers is a member of the global
terrorist group ‘Muslim Brotherhood
Khalid al-Mansour
candidate’s relative, Raila Odinga, who is connected with brutal
Muslim politics in Africa, and background
information on the candidate’s estranged father who
was part of Kenya’s most corrupt regime

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Just how does a single politician “send jobs overseas?”
Actually how do all or any of our politicians “send jobs overseas”?
Did McCain vote for the send jobs overseas bill? When was that passed?
Spurious is much too soft a word for these kind of lies.

Posted by: smith | October 21, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Now … will Joe Biden call for these calls to end? … I don’t think so …
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | Oct 21, 2008 7:30:22 PM
Those calls don’t call McCain a baby killer or somebody who palls around with terrorists. It does however, point out the economic issues.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

So Palin is guilty of Abuse of Power, Ethics Violation, Misappropriation of Funds, and knows nothing about domestic or international policy.
And McCain thought she was the best choice because?

Posted by: Should have gone with Liberman | October 21, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Must be I missed the McCain dictatorship that must have been going on for the last 15 – 20 years. Jobs have been going overseas for quite some time, not just the last 8 years. Seeing how the call wants to put sole blame on McCain, he must have been a dictator for many years.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

To bad VERTERAN obviously never read Obama’s books either.
He has cut and pasted the same fabricated quotes that you posers have been using for months now.
If you are unable to understand all the big words in the books, you could at least go to factcheck before you post bogus information.
You would see that the lines you quoted don’t even exist.

Posted by: Veteran of the War on Ignorance | October 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

And McCain thought she was the best choice because?
Posted by: Should have gone with Liberman | Oct 21, 2008 7:38:06 PM
Because he is looking for a new wife…lol

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Yah McCain has been in Congress forever.
And yet he hasn’t solved a single problem that he now says he knows how to fix – like catching Bin Laden for example.
If he knew how to catch Bin Laden, why didn’t he tell anyone?

Posted by: 270+ Going for Obama | October 21, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

But this “spurious” robo call isn’t directly from the Obama campaign and at least isn’t accusing McCain of “associations with terrorists.”

Posted by: matt | October 21, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Your swiftboat 2.0 seems a litle one sided. Is ther a smae type of site for McCain. Look other places also. Ones that bothe defend and attack both sides. Might be a little more un-biased.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

It’s weird that McCain wouldn’t say that Palin is qualified for the job when he was asked at the debate.
You would think he would say, “Hell yah”
But instead, he just said, “I’m really proud of her. She’s done a great job.”
WHAT????
Come on. Tell the truth now. Sarah Palin is really McCain’s daughter right? It’s all starting to make sense now. Being VP was probably what he promised her for Christmas last year.
It sure sounds like something a father would say after the high school play.

Posted by: We're So Proud of Her | October 21, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

HA! HA!…LOL..
THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS WITH DODD AND FRANK BARNEY WITH THE PHONY MORTGAGES GOT US INTO THIS MESS.

Posted by: John Pen | October 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Your swiftboat 2.0 seems a litle one sided. Is ther a smae type of site for McCain. Look other places also. Ones that bothe defend and attack both sides. Might be a little more un-biased.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 21, 2008 7:52:33 PM
IF you could read they also have myths and falsehoods on Sarah Palin etc. So that shoots your theory.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

‘Tis the silly (campaign) season, where irresponsible charges fly like the falling leaves. The next thing you’ll hear is that Sen. McCain is responsible for nuclear proliferation, while Sen. Obama helped create the Iron Curtain!

Posted by: chuck | October 21, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I notice all of this negativity comes on the heels of Biden espousing an attack in the first six months of an Obama presidency.
I guess both sides play the distractions game.
I care less about any negative remarks union leaders make about McCain, when Obama, and Unions want open voting. Meaning…they will know which way you vote. That would lead to an employee having to face either the union, or their employer, depending on how they vote. No more secret ballots.
Now…why the transparency on that, and no transparency that Obama wants government controlled internet?
Welcome to China!!!

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 21, 2008 7:52:33 PM
Go to politifacts.
The reason that other side is called Swiftboating 2.0 is because they are checking out the truth and validity of some of what is being said. Remember John Kerry in 2004?

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

gee jake,
almost as spurious as saying that obama palls around with terrorists (plural?)

Posted by: me | October 21, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Why is not abuse of power to send tax money to your wife’s employer and she get her salary doubled. Why is it not abuse of power to send tax money to your church that teaches racism and hate mongering, teaches that Blacks are the chosen people? Senator Obama is an abuser of power in my world.

Posted by: Mary | October 21, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Veteran of the War on Ignorance
No I have not read his books. I would rather not. Have you read them yourself? What I would rather do is see that his birth certificate is checked and authenticated to make sure he is eligible for office. Why does it have to take a lawsuit for that small matter to be done and over with.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

“John McCain has gotten us into this economic crisis. He supported sending our jobs overseas”
’nuff said. McCain also supports insourcing.
That’s probably the crisis that Obama will be tested on in 6 months. H1B lottery occurs just about that time. Vote no on H1B, L1 and any other type of work visa.
Indians are KILLING their CEOs over in India whenever business decisions are made that they don’t like (albeit seems those busines decisions are unfair to their citizens). We don’t need violence in our workplace, we don’t need terrorism in our nation, and the visas for greedy H1B slavemasters MUST be reduced to limit our exposure to this threat based on business desire for cheap slave labor.
Look it up, please!
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | October 21, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

More from today’s NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
Overall: Obama 52, McCain 42.
Believe Palin is qualified? 55% no, 40% yes
Palin favorables: 38% positive, 47% negative.
Concerned McCain will continue Bush policies: 23%
Concerned Obama is too inexperienced: 23%
Race an important factor? 8% yes. Of those: 4% less likely to vote for Obama, 2% more likely.
Age an important factor? 22% yes. Of those: 18% less likely to vote for McCain.
Powell endorsement’s impact: 77% no difference, 19% more inclined to vote for Obama, 4% less inclined.
On issues: Obama +39 on health care, +21 on economy, +14 on taxes. McCain +5 on Iraq.
On traits: Obama +30 on hope and optimism, +20 on right temperment. McCain +4 on stronger leader.
Obama’s voter enthusiasm: excited 52%, satisfied 33%
McCain’s voter enthusiasm: excited 26%, satisfied 34%

Posted by: zak | October 21, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Veteran of the War on Ignorance
No I have not read his books. I would rather not. Have you read them yourself? What I would rather do is see that his birth certificate is checked and authenticated to make sure he is eligible for office. Why does it have to take a lawsuit for that small matter to be done and over with.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 21, 2008 8:05:43 PM
Then how come you are posting something that isn’t true. You need to do your homework and find out the validity of things before you post lies.
That is the reason you don’t like that Swiftboating 2.0 site because it debunks the nonsene you republican thugs are putting out there.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Mary,
If you’d ever helped a business “grow”, you would understand why. Otherwise, you’re a business user — not necessarily the best and brightest American businesses seek to hire. A business is only the sum total of the types of employees they hire.
I would like to see businesses in the U.S. get back to rewarding the people that help them grow. If you’re just getting a paycheck (as is evident by your comments about Michelle Obama), then you’re sucking down the businesses money without trying to secure your future, the future of your business and the future of your own children. Get overs shouldn’t get welfare from the workplace.
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | October 21, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

That is the reason you don’t like that Swiftboating 2.0 site because it debunks the nonsene you republican thugs are putting out there.
I don’t consider myself a republican thug. I am just an american who loves his country and wants facts on the backgrounds of both candidates. I want to make an informed decision instead of a decision based just on what a candidate says. I have seen enough of politics over the years to know that most politicians lie. Wouldn’t you agree to that??

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Most of my posts are designed to stimulate someone to actually go and look for themselves and make a decision. I have seen more untruths here against voth candidates and then see people seem to actuall believe.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. See below.
Name Office State Party Grand Total Total from
PACs Total from
Individuals
Dodd, Christopher J S CT D $165,400 $48,500 $116,900
Obama, Barack S IL D $126,349 $6,000 $120,349
Kerry, John S MA D $111,000 $2,000 $109,000

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Apparently Sen. Obama is now denying that in the 1990s he conducted leadership-training seminars for ACORN’s up-and-coming organizers, since he said in the last debate: “The only involvement I’ve had with ACORN was I represented them alongside the U.S. Justice Department in making Illinois implement a motor voter law that helped people get registered at DMVs.”
I would love to know whether his seminars included instructions on how to extort and intimidate the banks into giving mortgages to individuals who could not afford to make the mortgage payments. If so, then Sen. Obama had a direct hand in the current financial crisis.

Posted by: James Danley | October 21, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Desperation from the left to prey on the ignorance of people who do not keep up with the MSM on a regular basis. It is a known fact that the Dems got us into this mess starting with Jimmy Carter and the Reinvestment Act, to Clinton who expanded on it, to ACORN who strong armed the banks to give loans to people who could not afford them.
John McCain warned about the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a letter dated May 5, 2006, can be seen on the internet and the Dems said he was setting off alarms when there was no fire. This is because the Dems were getting contributions from Fannie Mae and didn’t want the money to stop.
What I find telling is that the investigation into this is set for AFTER the elections because the Dems think they are going to win the White House and keep their majority and this can just be swept under the rug.
You can bet that if a Republican were to blame, it would have come out a long time ago and action would have been taken immediately.

Posted by: S Adams | October 21, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

That is the reason you don’t like that Swiftboating 2.0 site because it debunks the nonsene you republican thugs are putting out there.
I don’t consider myself a republican thug. I am just an american who loves his country and wants facts on the backgrounds of both candidates. I want to make an informed decision instead of a decision based just on what a candidate says. I have seen enough of politics over the years to know that most politicians lie. Wouldn’t you agree to that??
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 21, 2008 8:16:15 PM
I agree with that. But please research them. Not all of what is written on the internet is true and not every email you receive is either. I generally look at the sources provided for what they are saying and check things out myself.
I have done enough research on both of these men, that I feel comfortable voting for Obama.
I like politifacts because they have things on both candidates. The Swiftboating site is just that. Trying to debunk some of the lies from people.
We can agree to disagree.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

As a republican from PA, I dont know many people supporting this team McCain/Palin. The issue is that people dont trust Sarah Palin. McCain is looking ill these days and Americans not wanting this women to become the next president. The other issue is the economy. Poeple are hurting in PA and the reality is that McCain does not have a clue whats going on in these economic times. This time around Obama/Biden is the best team Period. As a republican I will put my country first and vote for the best team and that is NOT MCCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Mark | October 21, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Obama has only been in the senate for three years but he is the second highest receivers or donation from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. See below.
Name Office State Party Grand Total Total from
PACs Total from
Individuals
Dodd, Christopher J S CT D $165,400 $48,500 $116,900
Obama, Barack S IL D $126,349 $6,000 $120,349
Kerry, John S MA D $111,000 $2,000 $109,000
Posted by: Jeanie | Oct 21, 2008 8:19:12 PM
If you are going to post numbers please provide a source. I guess you are going to try and tell me no Republicans took any money from them. (Rick Davis)

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I agree. Who in their good mind vote for Obama.

Posted by: Jack Frost | October 21, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

I think John McCain was wrong. Obama’s backround, his mentors, his money men…they’re all Muslim. His slip of the tongue of “my Muslim faith” to George S., his 57 states, his sympathy for the Palestinians. His relatives(Muslim father and stepfather) and schooling until his mom dumped him off at his grandparents when he was 10. Good old Jesse Jackson spilled it with the Zionist comment.
If the unions need to look in the mirror before they blame McCain for all their woes.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 21, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

I am sorry I menat to say who in their good mind will vote for McCain.. Take that from a Redneck republican from West virginia

Posted by: Jack Frost | October 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

We could have avoided the current financial mess we’ re in, but certain key Democrats (including all-time Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac political contribution leaders Chris Dodd) killed it . …in 2005 Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie “continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road,’’ he said. “We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk.’’
Former Fannie Mae CEO Franklin Raines (who left the company after using accounting voodoo to line his pockets with undeserved bonuses) worked for the Clinton administration. He’s also advised the Obama campaign.
It has been liberals, and not conservatives, who have in the past demanded that mortgage lenders be forced to loan to subprime borrowers. Jimmy Carter signed the Community Redevelopment Act into law, and Bill Clinton amplified that legislation creating the market for subprime loans that is causing all of these problems now.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

I think John McCain was wrong. Obama’s backround, his mentors, his money men…they’re all Muslim. His slip of the tongue of “my Muslim faith” to George S., his 57 states, his sympathy for the Palestinians. His relatives(Muslim father and stepfather) and schooling until his mom dumped him off at his grandparents when he was 10. Good old Jesse Jackson spilled it with the Zionist comment.
Not to mention, a lot of Obama’s higher ups have antipathy toward Israel. It really got my attention the night of the Townhall debate, when that retired Naval Officer asked how each candidate would respond to an attack on Israel.
McCain, said they were a strong ally of the U.S. and no question, we’d be there to help.
Obama would go thru the UN….and the UN is corrupt, slow to act, and has many many ambassadors that are anti Israel.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

S Adams,
The Community Reinvestment Act does not cover the vast majority of institutions making these predatory loans. The problem is not the CRA, it is the repeal of the Glass-Steagal Act which passed under Clinton’s term, unfortunately with a veto-proof majority.

Posted by: White Hillbillies for Obama | October 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Just type in Fannie and freddie contributions in google and the sites are listed. McCain is on there also for 21,000.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

I live a rural small town of Brooksville Florida. I tell you the truth is that people are hurting and loosing their homes. This is a town that is embracing Obama. Obama will win this county. I think that Obama undestastand the economy not McCain.

Posted by: Reba heart | October 21, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

And ACORN was snuck into the first bail out proposal…to garner millions in tax payer dollars. When it was discovered, it was removed. I still wonder if it truly was.
Hollywood got a chunk of the bail out as well.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Jwench
Yes we can agree to disagree and if in your mind Obama is your guy then by all means vote for him and I applaud you. That is what the right to vote is all about. We all see things differently. To have others try to intimidate you for your choice is what is wrong. My hope is that God sees to it that the right one is elected, we need the best for the job with all that is front of them.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

If you are going to post numbers please provide a source. I guess you are going to try and tell me no Republicans took any money from them. (Rick Davis)
Posted by: Jwench | Oct 21, 2008 8:26:25 PM
++++++++++++++++++
Rick Davis was HIRED as pres of an advocacy group set up by Fannie Mae. He was not a public figure or politician. It is a known fact that more Dems lobbied for Fannie Mae and accepted more $$ than Republicans. While there are a few Republicans who took money, the majority were Dems.

Posted by: S Adams | October 21, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

I think that Obama undestastand the economy not McCain.
Tax Experts agree that closing loopholes, and a scalpel to spending won’t raise the 800 million to start Obamas programs. Where will it come from. I have heard I have a plan from every politician since the 1970′s

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Chicago Sun Times:
How would Barack Obama pay for the $800 billion that John McCain claimed in the first presidential debate Sept. 26 in Oxford, Miss., that his Democratic opponent would spend if he were elected president? Obama replied, by “closing tax loopholes.”
Obama was no more specific in the debate, and tax experts doubt that structural changes without increasing taxes can raise anything close to that amount of money.
My office asked the Obama campaign for the details, and it responded with a 19-page single-spaced paper on the candidate’s “tax plans.”
In fact, there was precious little about tax policy in the paper, which amounted to a repeat of Democratic campaign oratory that can be heard in 30-second speeches before both houses of Congress daily on C-SPAN.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I don’t know. Obama’ and Biden championed the working man. Revered him….extolled help for him….then when one..one person, who didn’t seek Obama out, but saw him in his neighborhood, and asked a simple question…was berated, investigated, and drug thru the mud, because …not his question, but Obama’s answer was scrutinized, and this man had to be punished for doing that to Obama. This working man, trying to get his life in order, and pay his bills. How did Obama, and Biden show their respect to this working man, they championed? They mocked, and ridculed him. That doesn’t sound like someone, who once they get what they want from the working man, will stand by the working man.
From Barney Franks:
I think at this point, there needs to be an immediate increase in spending, and I think this is a time when deficit fear has to take a second, uh, a second seat. I do think this is the time for a very important kind of dose of [unintelligible]. Yes, I think later on, there should be tax increases. Speaking personally, I think there are a lot of rich people out there who we can tax at a point down the road to recover some of this money.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

The best-funded political campaign in American history says news organizations will have to pay—in some cases almost $2,000 each—if they want to cover Barack Obama’s election-night celebration in Chicago.
A memo sent to news organizations on Tuesday by the Obama campaign says credentials will cost $715 to $1,815, depending on whether electrical and phone lines are needed and whether an indoor or outdoor seat is requested for the event, which is expected to be held outside the evening of Nov. 4 in Grant Park.
The only free admissions are for a “general media” area. But, the memo says, “Please note that the general media area is outdoors, unassigned and may have obstructed views . . . standing room only.”
The area also does not include access to top Obama campaign officials, whose statements likely are to be in hot demand on Election Night. They apparently will be available only in the “press file” tent, to which an additional admission fee of $935 per person is being imposed.
Obama aides declined to answer questions about why a campaign that raised $150 million in the month of September is demanding such payments. But the memo already is drawing some protest.
geeze. Didn’t he just make $150 million? Where will all this money go to?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Obama was not an economics major. He said in his debates he likes his friend Warren Buffet. He has only been in the Federal government 4 years. How could he possibly totally understand the economy and the way to fix it?

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Simple economics says all tax increases to corporation and business just get passed on to the consumer and causes them to seek other places to take their businesses. Both mean lost jobs and less money in your pocket.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Raising taxes, on the rich, will only cause more lay offs, loss of jobs, loss of businesses, and more people without homes.
There is no magic answer…and so far government has proven they can’t handle things very well.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Seeing as we have so many experts on the economy on here, why aren’t you running for POTUS if you can do so much better? That’s right your not.
Let’s figure out which candidate is going to steer us in the right direction.

Posted by: Jwench | October 21, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Let’s figure out which candidate is going to steer us in the right direction.
I think there is one other thing to remember. The senators and representatives that are running need scrutiny just as much as they also are needed to straighten this mess out.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Lobbying is done on both sides.
Although Obama refuses direct campaign contributions from “Washington lobbyists,” he takes money from lobbyists’ spouses and holds fundraisers at the offices of law firms that lobby Congress. He won’t touch money from PACs or lobbyists representing big oil and drug companies, but he happily accepts huge amounts of money from executives at those companies and many others. In fact, he’s relying on two oil company executives to raise $50,000 apiece for his campaign.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 21, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

McCain did support sending that tanker contract overseas to Airbus rather than build here with Boeing. But he was just following the instructions given to him by his lobbyists…

Posted by: kravitz | October 21, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

People need to wake up. Obama is not talking about taking Joe the Plumbers money and giving it to people without jobs. That is ridiculous and untrue. He is talking about Mega rich people who are raking in obscene profits while paying their workers minimum wage. If they complain too loud about the low wages, they look for workers in India or China to do the work so they can make even higher profit.
Think about the Walmart hiers making billions a year while their workers can’t pay rent. Think about mortgage and finance CEO’s with paychecks of 487 million over three years while they rape homeowners. Think about Oil execs making 500 billion a year in profit while they bleed America dry.
Wake up people. These mega rich 1-5% don’t let ANYTHING trickle down. They rape the American worker for everything they can and they DON’T PAY TAXES! They write off losses, find every loophole and then have folks like McCain subsidize them. AND YES … paying taxes is patriotic!! It is how we fund America. The problem is that the middle class carries the burden while the mega-rich carry off the rewards.

Posted by: DaveinColorado | October 22, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

“Wake up people. These mega rich 1-5% don’t let ANYTHING trickle down.’
Well, dave in colorado, it doesn’t work any better when you try to “trickle UP”!

Posted by: QUESTIONER.. | October 22, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Just type in Fannie and freddie contributions in google and the sites are listed. McCain is on there also for 21,000.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 21, 2008 8:34:37 PM
_____________
But Obama was the second largest recipient of F and F pork….. over $132,000… and it was gotten in the shortest period of time!

Posted by: QUESTIONER.. | October 22, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

More or less spurious than when McCain said that Barack Obama caused the economic crisis?

Posted by: Tim | October 22, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

‘A Veteran’: “is this enough names to start with??
candidate’s pastor met with…”
Just the fact that you start your list with that says it all. If there was actually anything dubious about Obama’s associations, you’d be able to be much, much more direct than that.
And this ‘quote’ you use: “Should the political winds shift in an ugly direction I will side with the Muslims.’” betrays where you’re getting your information from. That quote is wrong. He actually wrote “… I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” and the ‘them’ in that sentence is not ‘Muslims’, it’s ‘Arab and Pakistani AMERICANS’. He was writing about the problems, the suspicions and prejudice, immigrant communities faced in the wake of 9/11.
Personally, I don’t have a problem with Obama wanting to represent every American, and to fight prejudice and racism. Maybe you do though?

Posted by: Aengil | October 22, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

“It’s up to voters to punish them (Republicans) for ruining our great nation and their behavior of putting corporations and greed over struggling americans.”
It’s just too bad that we all have to suffer because so many of you lack a basic understanding of Economics 101, Capitalism and the Free Market. But after the most radical Liberals have their way in both Congress and the White House over the next four years, so many of you will have plenty of time to read and study about all three since you will no longer have an employer.

Posted by: James Danley | October 22, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Tim, Sen. Obama conducted seminars for new ACORN organizers back in the 1990s. If his seminars included how to extort and intimidate banks into giving flexible subprime mortgages to low income individuals, than he certainly did help cause this economic crisis.

Posted by: James Danley | October 22, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.