By Ed O'Keefe

Oct 27, 2008 10:03am

Dowd: Top Five Reasons McCain Will Likely Lose

Opinion by Matthew Dowd, ABC News Political Contributor

So, we have a little over a week left in this campaign, and hundreds of thousands of people have already voted, and at this point it looks like Obama will win unless something catastrophic happens (probably has to be a major mistake on his part).

And there has been a ton of discussion recently about why McCain is probably going to lose.  I want to add my two cents to that discussion because it is a bit different than others, and being statistic oriented I am going to give each factor a percentage of what it represents as a cause of that likely loss.

Here are the top five Dowd factors of a McCain loss:

1. Political Environment: 60% of the reason for a probable McCain loss.

We have an incumbent president with the lowest job approval ratings in modern times –- lower than Nixon as he was pushed from office because of Watergate. 

In addition, nearly 90-percent of the country thinks things are on the wrong track. This all has given Democrats a generic ballot lead of double digits. (Generic ballot is when you have no names just party and ask who the country wants in office).   

This wave would be hard for anyone to stop. 

That is why the equilibrium of this race has always been one with Obama with a three or four point lead. The last couple of weeks has merely moved Obama’s lead closer to the generic ballot number.

2. Brand Damage: 20% of the reason for a probable McCain loss.

Sen. McCain, over the course of the last few years, has damaged his original brand of an independent maverick who would throw the flag on either side of the field. The seeds of this brand damage were sown years ago as McCain coddled up to the religious right and President Bush. 

And that damage was exacerbated in how his campaign has been conducted over the last few months –- negative attacks voters could care less about and emphasizing issues about which only conservatives seemed to care.

3. Palin Pick: 10% of the reason for a probable McCain loss.

The Palin pick for vice president made McCain look like a total political opportunist as the American public came to the conclusion that she was unqualified for this office. 

In addition, swing and moderate voters were put off by her views on many issues and her personal attacks on the Democratic ticket.

4. Debates: 7% of the reason for a probable McCain loss.

It is very unusual for one ticket to win every single debate. According to polling and most focus groups, Obama won all three presidential debates and Biden overwhelmingly bested Palin.

McCain, when the debates were done, had no more opportunities in a big way to address a large audience. The Democrats won the debates in a substantive way, but more importantly, temperament was highlighted, which hurt McCain.

5. Financial Meltdown: 3% of the reason for a probable McCain loss.

The collapse of Wall Street put the economy front and center, and the way McCain handled the challenge didn’t make voters feel warm and fuzzy. 

Keep in mind: before this happened, the economy was already the number one issue –- it just became even more important because of the mess. 

Remember, Obama was already rising back in the polls after the initial Palin/Republican National Convention bump wore off. 

I know this is a very simplistic explanation; I’m sure there are other factors, but these are my top five reasons why John McCain is likely not to be moving into a new house in January.

User Comments

My opinion of why McCain is going to loose. Goerge Bush and SARA PALIN. He might have been able to over come Bush but Dang it, choosing her was just stupid.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 27, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Well in less than 8 days there will be another President no matter who wins. As for me, I’ve voted for Obama. It’s picking the better of two evils. Yes he says this and his says that, and I do believe that he does want change. But on any platform, he is a politician. So is McCain.
I see it this like this, see if you can relate;
For the past 8 years we have been going to the Company (America) Christmas Party and being served the same old dry chicken dinner. At first it was ok and free. The company paid for me and my guest. Then after 4 years they asked that I pay to attend the party (and for my guest) due to increase costs of food and entertainment going up (Wall St). So, I Pre-paid to attend the party. But, when my guest and I got to the door, I was told that it was going to cost me $200.00 more per person to attend. I had to pay it. After all, it’s my company (America) I work for.
Now, there is a chance for a change in Upper Management. This change in Upper Management is changing the menu and the entertainment line-up. No more dry chicken. They are offering an open buffet. The cost is a bit high, but after 8 years of the same ol’ same ol’, I’m open to being feed something different.
Change is coming, one way or the other. The same ol’ some ol’ but paying MUCH more, or something totally different.
See you at the next Company Christmas Party.

Posted by: NIA-New Mexico | October 27, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

It’s also been proven that voters think that 72 is too OLD to be an effective president.

Posted by: pt | October 27, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Biggest reason: Bias in media.
The media and their relentless assault on McCain and Palin. Reporting everything negative, even rumors. An example is the “kill him” comment. The Secret Service said it was bogus and did not happen. A single ‘reporter’ claimed it did and all the media ran with it as gospel. Did they correct the record? Nope. They loved the damage done and left it at that.
Enter Sarah Palin. The media immediately hated her. She didn’t even finish her speech at the convention and they were trashing her. Since the convention, it has been all negative all the time. Has Sarah Palin done anything in her life that was good? Not according to the media.
Is it the same with Barack Obama? Not by a mile. Look at the headlines at any news website. Count the negative stories towards McCain, and count the positive towards Obama. Not a single story that reflects bad towards Obama.

Posted by: On to it | October 27, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I just had a thought…In eight days this will be all over, and hopefully, if Americans do their research and vote for Obama…
We will never have to hear Palin’s sarcastic whiney voice ever again.
That is enough to get my vote. HAHAHA

Posted by: MyBrainReallyHurts | October 27, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

On to it – Isnt this the same liberal media that got Bush elected TWICE?
The media has nothing to do with it. If McCain had picked a better running mate, the race would be much, much closer today.

Posted by: MyBrainReallyHurts | October 27, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Please tell me is it really going to be over in 8 more days?..Really?..Oh god I hope so!….
Go MCrage!

Posted by: Roc | October 27, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

You underestimate the role the pick of Palin will play in his loss (combined w/ concerns about his age). She inspires no confidence among anyone but the hard-core (& shrinking) republican base. I’d put the pick of her up at near 40%.

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 27, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Nov 4 will be a castrastophic event for Obama. Americans are actually going to vote instead of the media.

Posted by: geevill | October 27, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Reason Number 6: No wants a liar in the White House especially after 8 yrs of lies.
McCain has repeated lied and exaggerated during the course of this campaign.
And his attack dog with lipstick is an even bigger liar than McCain is not to mention a complete ditz.

Posted by: con me not | October 27, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

In a videotaped interview with Barack Obama on Chicago Public Radio WBEZ FM, in 2001, Obama explains the “tragedy” that the civil rights movement did not result in the ‘redistribution of wealth’. Primarily, the redistribution of wealth to ‘community organizers’ and others that could bring about change in the political system.
Obama talks openly about breaking free of the “constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution” and in so doing, achieve “social justice” through “redistributive change.”

Posted by: con me notgood | October 27, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I keep hearing/reading that Obama is a pretty sure bet of winning on November 4th (I hope so). Why is it then that when you look at the polls, Obama and McCain are now running 50/50?? I know polls are polls, but why do MSN, CNN, ABC, and Politico show them as being so close. Where’s Obama’s lead?

Posted by: Debbie, SC | October 27, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

geevill: “Nov 4 will be a castrastophic event for Obama. Americans are actually going to vote instead of the media.”…..We have heard nothing but media spin for 2 years….when America does speak it may surprise many….especially Obama. If/when he looses we will have to endless media BS on the prejudice of America. If/when he wins we will hear endlessly from the likes of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton on how he should run America. To all those that think America is an unhappy place….you ain’t seen nothing yet. Obama being lead around by the nose by Pelosie and Reid will trash America….think I’m wrong…read history. Presidents whose party have control of both Houses will not stop them from anything they want to do. Anything they send to him he WILL sign…ANYTHING. He doesn’t have the desire or backbone to do otherwise regardless of how bad it will be for the country.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Biden promises a war in 6 months.
So you might want to get ready for the draft and martial law.
Buy dried beans.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Past is prologue.
Why doesn’t Dowd say that Obama who has to take an oath before taking office on our Constitution of which he doesn’t believe in? And that ABC is not reporting!

Posted by: john g. | October 27, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

It’s curious to me why McCain’s supporters blame the media for his decline in the polls. McCain has failed to run a campaign worthy of his reputation. Don’t blame the media, blame the man. This campaign is McCain’s responsibility and he blew it.

Posted by: MJ Parlier | October 27, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

MyBrain:
You think that the liberal media elected Bush twice? Where were you then?
It was the democrats (Kerry) and the media that tried to do the same thing that was done durring the vietnam war. They tried to go in a antiwar/anti troop way and the country would not tolerate it. The hippy way of the sixties are dead. We have an all volunteer armed services that are damn proud to do their job with honor.
The media and democrats realized that their ‘hate the troops’ campaign wasn’t going anywhere, so they changed their message to ‘support the troops, hate the mission’, a bunch of b.s. The democrats and the media were wishing we lose the war. They still do. Why would they wish such a thing? Because they equate a victory in war is a victory for Bush. They hate Bush so much that they would rather lose than to give an ounce of credit to the man. Wishing for America to burn over bitter politics isn’t patriotic.
The media and the democrats dug their hole last election and lost.

Posted by: On to it | October 27, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Debbie, SC: “I keep hearing/reading that Obama is a pretty sure bet of winning on November 4th (I hope so).”…the reason the polls are tightening up is because the media has lied to you for over a year. This has always been closer than they said it would be but they were trying to demoralize the right. Now that it’s getting closer to the day of truth they need to make it more correct because if they predict a 20 point win and LOSE then their credibility is shot and they get exposed as being propogandists instead of the prefered label of journalist.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

OBAMA HAS BEEN CONSISTANT WITH HIS CAMPAIGN SINCE THE BEGINNING—MCCAIN HAS FLIP FLOPED ALL OVER THE AND HAS NO REAL PLATFORM—–VOTED ALONG WITH BUSH OVER 90%–AND NOW CLAIMS HE IS NOT BUSH—IS HE NOW PALIN –REALLY WHO KNOWS
GOODBYE MCCAIN
VOTE FOR OBAMA

Posted by: rodney | October 27, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Indoctrination of college students needs to end. We all know that college professors are flaming ‘hate America’ liberals. That is no excuse for them to brainwash their students into braindead liberals. They may claim to be liberals while they are ignorant in school. When they graduate, buy a home and enter the workforce they will mostly become conservative filled with regret about their foolish liberal ideals. Funny how things work. But it is the college kids that damage areas and cities that wouldn’t normally be liberal. They vote in their college towns causing some major damage to the tax payers that are permanent residents of those towns.
It is a known fact that the democrats want to block the military votes. Remember the 2004 election. How about we block all college students then.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Reason #6
A campaign run so poorly it begs to wonder how McCain would run an administration. He seems to let his advisors make decisions that should be his, like choosing a VP. On another note – Biden did not predict a war in 6 months and it is common knowledge any new president(dem or rep) will be challenged in his first year.

Posted by: Annie | October 27, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

When we feel good about the world and the economy, we look for a leader we would like to have a beer with, when we don’t, we look for a leader with the potential to provide clear, cool, steady, well-reasoned leadership. When you are sick, you look for a doctor who (you think) knows his stuff, not someone you could be buddy-buddy with.

Posted by: John | October 27, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

McCain used the better part of these last two months on “Silly Season” topics. Lipstick on Pig, Ayers, ACORN, “Who is Obama?”. Talk about great talking points. He and Palin used standard Republican talking points to attack and this time I think that many Americans this time just want our problems solved and we want to know who is solve them.

Posted by: Francheska | October 27, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

The main reason McCain will lose this election is because I don’t know if he has a rock for a brain or if he really just lack common sense. Picking Palin was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me. McCain is more than old. He is elderly. Palin is more than ignorant, she is stupid. I know 10 year olds who are more of an intellectual than she is. McCain’s judgement shows he is nothing more than an opportunist. Obama/Biden 08. It’s time some adults get into the White House. No more idiots.

Posted by: Detour4 | October 27, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Annie: “and it is common knowledge any new president(dem or rep) will be challenged in his first year.”….actually your “common knowledge” theroy is flawed. Those that would attack America already know the answer to such an attack if McCain were president and so would not inflame the issue more……Obama on the other hand would treat any attack as ANY Democrat would (with the exception of maybe Leiberman)and that would be to send in the FBI to investigate and to open lines of surrender to our enemies.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Tom are you talking about Faux News? I am so curious about how that crowd will react when it is a blowout…It seems to me that O’Reilly et al have been blowing smoke up their viewers backsides…I wonder after it is an Obama blowout if they are going to riot outside of Faux News HQ’s demanding the New channel to actually report on the real news not the Republican talking points.

Posted by: Becky | October 27, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

I think Obama will win Nov 4, just look at the alternative!! ;-)

Posted by: DeAndria | October 27, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

A FOX NEWS poll Question of the Day under politics. It is still there if you would like to see it under
http://elections.foxnews.com/
~~~~~~~~~~
Which presidential candidate do you think would face an international crisis in his first year in office if elected?
John McCain 86%
Barack Obama 11%
Both candidates 1%
Neither candidate 2%
Total Voters:2037135
This is FAUX NEWS that has a poll saying this…so I believe it because FAUX news NEVER has anything good to say about Obama and if Obama WINS…Hannity is going to have a mjor heart attack on live television because he has a MAJOR Obama fixation. ;-)

Posted by: francheska ;-) | October 27, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

John,
I fully agree with your comment: ” It’s curious to me why McCain’s supporters blame the media for his decline in the polls. McCain has failed to run a campaign worthy of his reputation. Don’t blame the media, blame the man”. People are getting smarter, so is their jugdment and the media reflects this trend! Mccain is an arcaic man, with old ideias, and also hyprocite!I never forget the fact that he left his first wife, then crippled, with 3 kids, to marry the 18 years younger heiress. What an opportunist!

Posted by: Anna Brum | October 27, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

On to it,
Get off of it!
McCain has had lots of news coverage of his negative strategy. Those hateful fans generated all kinds of free publicity for those who adhere to their philosophy.
Palin had a lot of good coverage too. She was shown in a very good light at first… until the truth started coming out. Her negative campaigning also continues to generate a lot of media coverage.
The trouble is, if all you base your campaign on is negativity, you really shouldn’t be surprized if that’s the kind of press it generates.

Posted by: Paul New man | October 27, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Becky, I am talking about ALL media outlets. To call Fox bias and not CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, as well as NY Times, Washington Post and LA times (just to name a few….shows just how clearly you have been fooled. Zogby, whose polls over the last few elections have shown to be the most accurate has this at a 4.5 point spread. Anything can happen here. If you think this is blow out then you have to ask some serious questions here, the biggest one is: Obama is out spending McCain almost 4 to one, the economy has taken a major slide, despite a changing war enviroment for the positive the public still wants out, major Bush fatigue, high food prices and gas prices….with all this going for him and Obama is only 4 to 8 points ahead…why? He should clearly be double digit and high double digit at that. There is something the media probably isn’t telling you. Obmission is still a lie if done with intent. You may have been lied to.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Biden promises a war in 6 months. This will be the “crisis” Obama needs to impose draft and martial law.
Biden said “mark my words”.
Alrighty then.
Buy dried beans and water purifiers.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I think that Obama might actually be doing better in the polls, but, the polls are being taken of people with landlines. I do not know anyone with a landline. All my friends have cell phones, so there is a huge segment of the popultation that is not being polled. My grandma has a landline, so maybe they are polling only old people. ;-)

Posted by: amaryee | October 27, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Dowd can’t see the elephant in the room! The biggest reason, if there is a DNC win, is the overwhelming amount of time the media has focused on the DNC candidate and neglected to do their jobs on the other candidates who are running. It is incomprehensible that the under-qualified leftist-polarized DNC candidate manipulated the media into doing his bidding. Now that the media is controlled by the DNC, we have only ourselves to blame if we let this continue. Vote for McCain/Palin. The McCain ticket is one of the most moderate mainstream candidates in years, and McCain is much better prepared to lead on Day 1 and make progress with those moderate policies that Americans support.

Posted by: Jack | October 27, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Why does AOL straw polls with one ISP per vote, with on average 165,000 votes, refreshed every week, consistently have McCain by a landslide?

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

francheska: “if Obama WINS…Hannity is going to have a mjor heart attack on live television because he has a MAJOR Obama fixation. ;-)”….LMAO…..you’re kidding right….an Obama win makes him MONEY. It just gives him more things to talk about.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Tomorrow will ABC run an article that says the 5 reasons Obama could lose?
1 — Ridiculous tax policy — additional taxes to spread the wealth is not patriotic. This is a country with a foundation to support hard work and success — not punish it. The DOW is in the toilet and Obama wants to increase capital gains tax. You don’t have to be rich to be impacted by this — no matter how little you have in the stock market you’ll end up with less. There isn’t enough time to go over the other impacts of his tax policy.
2 — No experience — sure Obama is a gifted speaker — but every Obama supporter I know can’t tell me what he has accomplished — they just say, well I like what he says?
3 — Not ready lead — the Presidency isn’t meant to be on the job training — Biden said this in the primaries and recently said Obama will be tested because of his inexperience
4 — Questionable relationships — I’m not sure why people ignore this — either Obama is clueless about the people he hangs out with or he enjoys hanging out with radicals — pick your poison — but it isn’t just one person or one group — there is a pattern here
5 — The American people vote — none of us know what will happen until Nov 4th — when Americans can vote — by secret ballot (would Obama like to eliminate that the same way he wants to do this for labor elections?)

Posted by: JJ | October 27, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Uh, Tom if Obama wins he will censor conservative media completely off the air within 6 weeks of inauguration. Radio and TV and Internet 2 is the new censored-filtered internet.
Bye bye freedom of speech.
And they will punish naysayers like Joe the Plumber who was “investigated” illegally.
Political Prisoners will be common under Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America: Oh, believe me it will get ugly. The good news is the populace are armed. Any infringement on the popluation will not be tolerated. To those on the left that thinks the Patriot Act was intrucive have no idea what true scrapping of rights really is.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

MCCAIN WAS “SONGBIRD” THE HANOI TRAITOR.
HE MADE 38 FILMS FOR THE NVA.
HE DID MORE TO HURT THE WAR EFFORT THAN 100 JANE FONDAS.
HE’S A FRAUD AND HAS BEEN HIS ENTIRE LIFE… FROM DUMPING HIS WIFE ON HER DEATHBED, THROUGH CINDY’S FAMILY MOB CONNEX, THROUGH THE KEATING FIVE, THROUGH DUMPING THE POW / MIAS, THROUGH “THE PALIEN”.
THE MAN’S GOT NO MORALS.
HE’S TOAST.

Posted by: CHUCK | October 27, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

About this ‘redistribution of wealth’ issue.
All the voices we hear criticizing this Obama’s proposal come from the majority of voters, who make much, much less. Guys, let’s face it. Most of those people will NEVER get to the point of making 250K.
My husband and I are now high paid professionals. We are immigrants, we came to this country well educated, but with no money, poor English, poor social skills. We both worked extremely hard to prove our education and get USA licenses. We do make more than 250K. And a lot of our friends as well.
What puzzles me in this ‘redistribution of wealth’ reaction, is why we never hear any complaints about this proposal from people like us? We are paying high taxes now, and we are ready to pay more, but we want Obama to be elected. What it is all about those complaints from people who have no chance to make this amount of money, whe are going to benefit from ‘redistribution of wealth’, but still cannot admit that Omama’s economic plan is much more … well, economic?

Posted by: E.K. | October 27, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

E.K., What you don’t seem to grasp is this is America. You got where you are from hard work and it’s not the governments job to tell you that you make too much….regardless of what ever amount you make. Right now the top 10% of earners are flipping the tab for over 85% of the taxes paid. Taxing them more is morally wrong. If you think the taxes won’t hit EVERYONE then you need to do some math. In a country of 375 million there are maybe only about 125 million actually working…..most under 250,000. He can not raise enough taxes from those making over 250,000 to pay for his 1.3 trillion increase in budget to pay for the programs he wants. That is an INCREASE in the budget…not the budget. EVERYBODY will get hit and hit hard…..I can hear the economy flushing already.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

That $250K???
THAT IS FOR COUPLES
And with Medicare caps?
The huge tax increases start at only $97,000 for an individual.
Add in the fact that Obama will let lapse the Bush tax cuts, the National real estate tax, fuel tax, global tax, carbon tax, cap gains tax, dividend tax, and corporate double taxation and the tax hit starts at only $40K for an individual earner.
PLUS you will pay MUCH HIGHER COSTS. Fuel alone will go up 25%.
PLUS you will be losing your jobs to outsourcing like crazy.
Oh, and Biden predicts a war within 6 months. So buy dried beans, water purifiers, and maybe some salt.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Drudgereport.com front page has Obama’s plans for REPARATIONS REDISTRIUTION OF WEALTH.
He will make reparations a “Civil Right”
He has said he will rewrite the Constitution.
Hell, he has no respect for it now, he won’t even show his vault birth certificate. He just flew to Hawaii and had it sealed.
My question is: The military is sworn to defend the Constitution, NOT Obama. Seems he thinks he is he end all be all.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Interesting article . . . John McCain is appearing frail and just a little out of it of late – this only enhances concerns about Palin.
If the “media” would have been doing it’s job, perhaps we would of found out just what her ‘experience’ is. Just what does is mean to be mayor of such a small town? And why no talk in the media about the natural gas pipeline she’s pinned her hopes on but will never be built?
And why no discussion about what her children are witnessing at each and every rally? They’re evidently getting their schooling by listening to the shouts from the crowds.
If anything the media has held back on looking too closely at Ms Palin just as it has avoided looking at McCain’s questionable associations.

Posted by: Birkie | October 27, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I support Obama. However, I think the race would have been much closer if McCain ran an effective campaign and he chose a running mate who knew something (anything!) of national political importance. This could have been a much closer race, but thanks to the decisions by McCain it is not even close.

Posted by: Jim | October 27, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Birkie I cannot believe you justwrote “questionable associations” about McCain?
Please, do not insult every thinking person here.
If you do not know to which I refer, please research Ayers, Auchi, Odinga, Wright, Farrakhan, Cone, Kambon, and Obama’s #1 influence Communist Frank Marshall Davis.

Posted by: Obama and Ayers Will Destroy America | October 27, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

McCain needs to fully explain his questionable ties to:
Jim Hensley, Convicted Felon; G. Gordon Liddy, Convicted Felon; Charles Keating, Convicted Felon;
Raffaello Follieri, Convicted Felon; Rick Renzi, Under Indictment; Rick Well, to start with there is McCain’s association with: Davis, Freddie Mac Lobbyist;Charles Black, Lobbyist for Dictators; Richard Quinn, White Supremist; Pastor John Hagee, Bigot;
Pastor Rod Parsley, Bigot; Todd Palin, Member of Secessionist Group; Andrew McCain, Resigned Manager Failed Savings and Loan; Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ) indicted for extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other charges

Posted by: Birkie | October 27, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Can we please stop with the “liberal media” blame. The point of a presidential campaign is for everyone (including the public & the media) to critique all canidates involved. If any canidate is seen to be lacking in any area this will be circulated throughout the country with or without the “liberal media”. In today’s information age you can find an argument for any side you wish to take. Don’t like the “liberal media” change the channel and be indoctrinated by Fox News. That’s your choice. No one in gov’t or media has control of your remote and has even less control of what you absorb with your senses. It’s rediculous to think that after Republican rule for 8 years that suddenly the media has all-encompassing control of who gets voted into what office. What ever happened to may the best man (or woman) win. The best man is about to win and anyone who does accept that fact is as delusional as… well… A McCain supporter!

Posted by: The Truth | October 27, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Once again, we have to ‘brace ourselves’ fearing what method of deception will be used by the conservatives to steal this election. This time the Republican party has gone to far in its attempt to divide the country further. It will not work because history is on the side of the american people this time around. We have the conservatives just where we want them, ‘without legitimacy to rule any further at this point in history.’ In a plural democratic society; a social or government entity is “legitimate only to the degree that it seeks to redress inequality, not use it as a means to some indiscernible or obscure ends. The world is experiencing financial chaos caused by the lack of sufficient regulation on corporate entities such as banks, investment companies and just about anyone with the ‘know how to fleece the american people.’ The Bush administration is hiding the reality that under his watch ‘trillions of dollars in pension fund money has been lost as a direct result of the continuing worldwide collapse of stock markets. In panic, the administration ‘hatches a plan’ to bailout the corporations that have loss the pension fund money. By bailing out these institutions and claiming a share in the name of the american people. The Congress of the United States has opened the door to ‘scientific socialism’ in the name of saving capitalism. But it turns out that its only ‘socialism’ when government helps the victims, which in this case is the american people. We have war; unemployment; inflation; recession; no comprehensive healthcare program and a system of social security that is ‘on the brink. Also, americans are losing their homes at an alarming rate. The cost of outside energy sources such as oil by-products and the most important being gasoline. And these are just a few of this nations problems. I forgot to mention immigration. This presidential election is about “maintaining the status quo” or having a more inclusive role in the direction of this nation. We need a direction of change in order to access and repair the damage done in the last eight {8) years, and which impacts far too many of us for generations to come. We need solutions and not some useless rhetoric which suggest we forego another four years of Republican rule. The American people will speak, and speak loudly on November 4th.jBe sure to vote and remind family and friends to remind family and friends to “go out and vote.”

Posted by: Robert English | October 27, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

On 10/25/08 Mark wrote:
It is nice to see that not everyone is not being swayed by hated and fear and the GOP wants us to be.
* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your
grandparents, you’re “exotic, different.”
* Grow up in Alaska eating moose burgers, a
quintessential American story.
* If your name is Barack you’re a radical,
unpatriotic Muslim.
* Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track,
you’re a maverick.
* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are
unstable.
* Attend 5 different small colleges before
graduating, you’re well grounded.
* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community
organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard
Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers
150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law
professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a
district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the
state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee,
spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a
state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and
serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works
and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you don’t have any
real leadership experience.
* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4
years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town
with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a
state with only 650,000 people, then you’re qualified to
become the country’s second highest ranking executive.
* If you have been married to the same woman for
19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within
Protestant churches, you’re not a real Christian.
* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich
heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the
heiress the next month, you’re a Christian.
If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex
education, including the proper use of birth control, you
are eroding the fiber of society.
* If , while governor, you staunchly advocate
abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in
your state’s school system while your unwed teen
daughter ends up pregnant , you’re very responsible.
* If your wife is a Harvard graduate lawyer who
gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the
betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to
raise a family, your family’s values don’t represent America’s.
* If you’re husband is nicknamed “First
Dude”, with at least one DWI conviction and no college
education, who didn’t register to vote until age 25 and
once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of
Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.
OK, much clearer now.
A vote for McCain is a vote for the biggest scam America has ever seen.

Posted by: Your Guide | October 27, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

You forgot the one but very significant reason that McCain will lose… Media: 80%… It is no secret that the media is in bed with the Democratic Party. Journalism is now dead… journalists have put their political views in front of all else. They are a sellout…

Posted by: Nick | October 27, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

My 5 reasons is:
1. Liberal media skewed and ommitted the facts towards obama favor.
2. Reporters not doing their jobs being objective and impartial.
3. McCain won’t get tough with obama slimmy past.
4. Disenchanted voter thinks they doing the right thing by going with obama.
5. As a gifted BSer, obama can lied and makes it sound credible.

Posted by: USA-No1 | October 27, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The Democratic Party loves their “useful idiots” and it appears they have many…

Posted by: Nick | October 27, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

But “your guide” McCain has the scars to prove it. LOL

Posted by: RosaritoBjaCa | October 27, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Not to mention the overwhelming bias of the media toward Obama. Where is the coverage of Biden’s interview over the weekend which prompted the Obama campaign to blacklist the station who aired the interview? Ask Obama/Biden uncomfortable questions and they respond by censoring the media. But it’s ok to ask Palin uncomfortable questions. It’s ok to share stories about her that amount to vicious gossip. But questions concerning legitimate concerns and issues of Biden are not allowed.

Posted by: concerned_citizen | October 27, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I always wonder when people argue that the “media” is winning the election for Barack Obama if that means that you think the public cannot think for itself and it beleives whatever it sees on television or reads in the papers. Don’t insult peoples’ intelligence. most people form their own opinions regardless of what “agenda” you think the media is trying to push.

Posted by: Concerned about the facts | October 27, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

It is not possible to make an informed choice if you are not given all the information. Much of the media is censoring negative information about Obama and Biden.

Posted by: concerned_citizen | October 27, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

@rodney – actually, people grow up to be conservative because frontal lobe damage starts to set in at 40. The brain seriously deteriorates 5-15 years before death. And in between is just a downward spiral. One does not increase intelligence with age as you would have everyone believe. It goes down, down, down. Not only that, as one ages, so does their fear, which begins alter their decision making. Fear of getting hurt, fear of losing one’s job, fear of their kids running into the street, etc etc. They become more comfortable with status quo opposed to stirring things and changing things even when they know it’s the right thing to do. As one gets older, they fear change – any kind of change.
Now.. that’s not a good thing– to live in such fear that nothing gets accomplished.

Posted by: BIRD | October 27, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

@concerned_citizen = the media asks sarah palin uncomfortable questions? really? like what she reads or what court case she doesn’t agree with? are you kidding? biden answered these same questions.
an uncomfortable question for her would be to ask her about her ties to the alaska independence party or if she still backs abstinence only programs after her daughter is pregnant at 17.
see, those are the real kinds of questions that all the other candidates have answered. obama went on the o’reilly factor and interviewed with the biggest bully on tv.
so don’t give me that crap about the media being hard on sarah.

Posted by: BIRD | October 27, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Bird: “actually, people grow up to be conservative because frontal lobe damage starts to set in at 40.”….partly right…..people do grow up to be conservative mainly because they grow up. Winston Churchill once said, “If you are young and not a liberal, you have not heart. If you are old and not conservative you have no brain.” Bottom line is the young can be liberal with their ideas because they have very little worldly experience but once the reality and resonsiblity of family and home set in it clear that those that put out effort want to keep what they have earned. My guess, Bird, is that you are still in college and have yet to feel the real brunt of the world. Gurantee in 10 years your tune will be quite different.

Posted by: Tom | October 27, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I fully agree with Dowd on Point 2,3 and 5.Point# 1 and 4 I dont believe Democrats have any edge.But Mcain campaign’s collosal failure to address point#2,3 and 5 is going to cost them the elections big time.

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Why does the media have to include stuff and broadcast it about the families of the people running in this election??
I think that its all bull crap. It is nobodies business, only broadcast stuff about the actual persons running.
My goodness peoples need to grow up.

Posted by: HA HA | October 27, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

If “On to it” were on to some common sense, he or she would stop blaming the media for everything. The “kill him” comments were not bogus BECAUSE YOU CAN HEAR THE PERSON SAYING IT ON THE TAPE!!! CAN WE PLEASE STOP BLAMING THE MEDIA AND DEAL WITH THE FREAKIN’ ISSUES??!!

Posted by: stopthemadness | October 27, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Funny how the so-called liberal media is being blamed by desperate republicons this time. Even their beloved Fox Noise channel blames the Palin pick for much of McShame’s problems. I didn’t realize they grouped Rupert Murdoch as a liberal.
I also find it hilarious that they now blame the media. This of course is the same exact liberal media that allowed the coronation of ‘W’ by the supreme court to occur, followed by their refusal to investigate the voter caging in Ohio districts in ’04 that turned the election to ‘W’ illegally.
So basically, it is a liberal media when things don’t go their way but completely accurate when they do. What B.S.!

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Mr. Dowd,
You forgot another reason McCain may not move into the White House. He already has 7-13 other houses to move into…
But seriously, those of you that are still in serious mode, Obama did an unprecedented thing. He beat an unbeatable political machine- the Clintons. They were much, much, more formidable than this campaign. Blood was drawn, folks were battered, and there was 0% of the party that was undecided.
That made the Obama brand, strong, resilient, stalwart, more intelligent and possibly unstoppable.
It could be that McCain and his campaign were arrogant and uniformed about what voters were really looking for.
They started with straight talk and ended with muddled rhetoric.
Who hinges their campaign on “a washed up terrorist”?

Posted by: AProudCynic | October 27, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

@concerned_citizen — media bias trying to bury the biden interview from this last weekend? BIDEN HIT THAT ONE OUT OF THE PARK!! No one is ashamed of that interview – the only one ashamed is West that she didn’t get her guy. She attempted to make joe fumble and he handed her ass to her instead.
Joe biden did what he does best. sarah palin would have CRIED if anyone asked her half those questions. he’s once again proven why he’s qualified to step in as presidnt and palin is not. she can’t even handle katie couric.

Posted by: BIRD | October 27, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

i would like to know where all the money came for Obama to go to all those really expensive schools and colleges for all those years, since his mother is white (thats typical white trash) and his father is black and was not in the picture (thats a typical nig nig). From all these muslims that are at war with our USA. Go figure people, and that is who you are voting for. WORTHLESS AMERICANS that vote this year for either OBAMA and MCCAIN.
My vote will not be casted this election time. I could not have either being in the White House to ruin our USA.

Posted by: ***HATER*** | October 27, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

@tom – Tom, I am sorry that you were offended because of your old age. Denial isn’t going to help you. These are facts I present.
I almost gave you my age and family life history until I remembered that I don’t care what you think.
but one point: we can point to all those soccer mom votes for Bush the last election. those votes were generated by fear. they were concerned with homeland security.

Posted by: BIRD | October 27, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

@***HATER*** Obama started getting scholarships even while in high school in hawaii.
oh.. and remember, one can get school loans. trust me, i was in the hole about 150,000 for mine.

Posted by: BIRD | October 27, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Pros and Cons with both candidates, but here’s my reasons why McCain could not buy my vote (and I’m a registered Republican) —
1 – has run the most despicable campaign ever –
2 – Palin – what…a…moron. i am dumbfounded that anyone other than a complete idiot would support her as VP –
3 – mccain seems to focus almost entirely on what obama is going to/not do. i’d really like to hear what his plan is and how he intends to carry it out, but its too late –
4 – i did the research and i think obama has a better plan. plus he has spent considerable time explaining it and how he’s going to achieve it.
OBAMA/BIDEN 08/12

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I don’t need 5 reasons why our country won’t succeed. I need only one: Obama. He talks a lot.

Posted by: young_voter | October 27, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Tom, your argument about age holds no water. I was a conservative in college and later at age 30+ I became a liberal, after I realized how bad the republican policies were to middle-class families. The whole idea that repubs are the party of values falls apart when you look at how it affects one’s own family.
When I realized that Reagan’s policies destroyed much of what families hold sacred such as funding for public education, especially post-secondary, his elimination of survivor benefits for many children of the deceased it became obvious that republicans are anything but family friendly.
Reagan’s blatant disregard and defunding of the mental-health system of this country (which is why the homeless crisis became so bad) was the icing on the cake. He basically told the country to take on an “I got mine – Screw you” mentality.
All of this along with his phony anti-abortion stance was all designed to suck up to the religious right extremists because after many failed attempts he knew that without that he could not win.
So to be honest, I strongly believe Churchill had it backwards and I’d venture to say many of the folks old enough to remember what this country was like before him would agree.

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I think the Palin pick should rank much higher in the reasons why McCain will lose. She’s such a polarizing figure and she appeals only to the extreme religious right-wingers which, thankfully, are a minority in this country. Most importantly, she’s turned off the Independents and Moderates. I mean, anyone who is not blinded by her physical attractiveness, or the fact that she’s a religious zealot or that she’s a mom, will see that this woman is way too inexperienced in national and international issues to hold office in the White House. Her demeanor is also very unpresidential. The RNC would be foolish to even consider putting her up for nominatin in 2012 … they’d just suffer the same defeat as they are about to this year.

Posted by: annaloh | October 27, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Top 8 Reasons Obama will win!
1. George Bush (people will unfairly link McCain to Bush even though the two don’t like each other and McCain is considered not conservative enough in his own party)
2. Media Bias ( unbalanced reporting Giving Obama and forcing McCain to bring up the truth about Obama: Then blame him for running a negative campaign) If the media would have been fair and balanced McCain could have only ran on experience and Issues.
3. ACORN not saying Obama is connected or not although I believe he is! ACORN is supposed to be nonpartisan but have endorsed Obama and are linked to voter Fraud across the nation and all battle ground States!
4. Money ( lets face it money buys votes) Obama backed out on an earlier pledge on Campaign Finance allowing him to outspend McCain anywhere from 6-1 to 10-1 in all key battle ground states.
5. Young Voters and uninformed Voters: what Obama talks about sounds great to those who don’t have a lot of money but his redistribution of wealth is not what the founding Fathers ever intended!
6. Race: wining the African American vote 99% to 1% but that is not reverse racism!
7. Age: Young voters they will not vote for someone who is 72. (ageism) like racism only on age! However Ronald Reagan was 70 when he was elected and also one of our best Presidents!
8. Lack of understanding of the negative effects of Obama’s Tax plan: Raising taxes on those making more than 250,000 and business who makes more than 250,000. This will stop them from spending money and they will pass any increase on to the consumer effectively wiping out any tax break you receive. McCain will also cut your taxes if you actually pay any! And cut taxes on wealthy and Business this will inspire them to spend more money and provide better coverage and benefits to employees in the Middle class range. This does not even bring up the effects of doubling the Capital Gaines Tax on Business this will destroy any chance American business has to be competitive in a global Market.

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

A great nation is like a great household,preserving and guarding those qualities that puts it ahead of others.America is a great heritage and whether that status will be secured for the Americans people and by extension the larger world which benefit from it will be determined by this election.Most Americans are concerned about their jobs, national security,unhindered participation and influence on world affairs without most of them giving a serious thought to peace.Peace is the breaker of hard grounds that brings every dream to materiality.With the options staring them in the face,now American voters have the crucial choice between recuperating from years of wars and sliding further into ignominy.

Posted by: nwadimma | October 27, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

There’s only “ONE” reason there would be a McCain loss, the people not voting for him are stupid! Who doesn’t want more jobs from small businesses who provide 70% of them, which Obama with his backwards taxation will heavily tax, Dumb? You bet! Does redistribution work, NO. Look back in history and you will more than clearly see that. Obama will stop growth, stifle business costs us even more jobs than Clinton and our economy will crash into depression, trust me.

Posted by: Anna | October 27, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

McCain/Palin suppoters I agree the press has campaigned and manipulated all along for Obama. And they are now using and abusing their position with the Power of Suggeation..just have to read headlines watch their facial expressions when reporting on candidates. They want us to be complacent and feel defeated and give up before we even get to vote. I say ignore them. I am getting off these sights and going to McCains website and signing on to make phone calls in Ohio, Florida etc.. Something I’ve never done and not even crazy about politcal phone calls, but it looks like it is necessary to go back to good old fashioned grass roots helping with campaign and getting the word out. May I suggest you join me instead of trying to convince people on these boards. Lets get off these sights and let them blog among themselves.WE can make good use of the next few days in getting McCain his votes he deserves and helpi gat him elected. It is Important.

Posted by: conf1689 | October 27, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Item #2 -
It’s COULDN’T CARE LESS. If you COULD care less, it means you CARE. If you couldn’t care less, it means you DON’T CARE. It’s hard to give credence to someone who likes “statistics” but can’t figure out the basic logic of a commonly used phrase. I quit reading right there – the writer doesn’t know what he’s saying!

Posted by: Grammarisaurus | October 27, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Bush is the last idiot president to be elected…America is changing for good and there is no looking back the old republican party unless they start to include everybody. My wife and I came to this country 19 years ago. I’m telling you this country is changing a lot…more democratic. President Barak Obama will lead us to prosperity…like it or not. Go Obama!

Posted by: immigrant | October 27, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Obama is allowing Kevin Costner to campaign with his wife Michelle in Colorado on Tuesday. Kevin Costner on his honeymoon exposed himself to the masseuse, holding her wrist so she could not escape and had a happy ending. A happy ending that the masseuse had clearly said NO to when Costner asked for it. When the masseuse complained she was fired. I have to question Obama’s stance on women’s rights. If Michelle Obama is aware of Costner’s actions, what does this say about Michelle’s stance on women’s rights? Is it okay if the sexual offender is a rich Hollywood actor? Obama seems more interested in winning the election then he is concerned for women’s rights.

Posted by: Kate54 | October 27, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Ahah, we must have all been duped. The exaulted Anna is obviously correct and the 150,000 supporters of the Democratic ticket that I was with in Denver yesterday are all stupid. All because she has now told us this great truth on this silly blog. How could I have gotten it so wrong?

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

@ ANNA – first of all I support obama and i’m far from stupid. i had the sense to do some research of my own, analysis, and made an informed decision. second, obama has not said he will raise taxes on small businesses. he said he will raise taxes on individuals making more than $250k. since you dont appear very analytical i wont bother trying to explain the implications of this. do yourself a favor and conduct a little research of your own rather than just blindly listening to what mccain says.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“McCain will also cut your taxes if you actually pay any! And cut taxes on wealthy and Business this will inspire them to spend more money and provide better coverage and benefits to employees in the Middle class range..”
And that’s why Wal-Mart is a big “Chinatown”.. and all designer clothes made in Africa … and that’s why all customer services hire India people living in India.. So give more tax cuts to the wealthy and they’re going to redistribute it to the rest of the world but not for America..
Nice try, McLie!

Posted by: ghost | October 27, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

You tell her Idk!

Posted by: immigrant | October 27, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

McCain’s pick of Palin was his worst choice plus the fact that he has run a terrible campaign with negative overtones which have not resonated with voters who are very worried about the economy, their jobs, and their ability to stay afloat. When his age and Palin are combined, it makes a bleak picture. I can only hope that McCain is soundly defeated at the polls.

Posted by: Two-cats | October 27, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

#1 Reason Barack Obama will win this election. The Republican party has been high jacked by evangelicals. Ronald Reagan said “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me.” Well guess what? We’ve come full circle.

Posted by: New Democrat | October 27, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

McScam has had every chance to make a compelling story. He has gaffed every time, so why would anyone want to listen to his boneheaded ideas
A story has capture your attention and MaScam stories have not appeal what-so-ever!

Posted by: Your Guide | October 27, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Funny Kate 54! Not so funny..
Looks like you don’t know the story how J.McCain have got his second wife..;))) or Palin idea about you having baby from your rapist..
Grow up!.. And what’s your point?

Posted by: ghost | October 27, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Kate54 With your oh-so-phony character assassination of Kevin Costner, which by the way seem to be unverifiable, you have condemned an awful lot of folks. Kostner is a devoutly raised highly spiritual Southern Baptist. You are basically saying that all of this upbringing means nothing.

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

How’s the Kool-aid People?

Posted by: cathy | October 27, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Well here we go again. Obama just decreased his amount of raising taxes on those making 200,000 not 250,000.
Barney Frank has jumped on the Obama train by wanting to reduce military spending by 25%. Frank can’t wait for Obama to get in, he wants to do it now.
Well, this is the thanks that our military gets for risking their lives.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that if we are in two wars, threatened by terrorism,on alert with Russia and Venezuela who is helping N.Korea gain nuclear equipment,constant concern over Iran that we should be increasing the defense spending not decreasing it. If elected, what does the Obama administration and the democrats have in store for the people of America?

Posted by: Linda/Michigan | October 27, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Yes_We_will: you are not stupid just mis-guided you hear what you want without looking at it logically does anything Obama says make sense from a financial situation? Does it make sense that taxing the rich and Business will increase spending in the economy. Or grow jobs? If you say yes you are lying to yourself. His plan does not make sense. Increasing the Burden on Business does not inspire them to create jobs it will inspire them to do the opposite! Does increasing the financial burden on American business make it easier for these companies to be successful in a global economy? No these Companies will be forced to reduce wages, reduce the work force or shut down and move out of the country leaving many more out of a job. While forcing us to pay more money for Goods and Services. What good is a thousand dollar tax cut if you will pay 2,000 more over the year for goods and services? Think about it logically for one minute and you will see the obvious error in Obama’s plan!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

if McCain wanted to pull away from Bush, then he should have run as an indipendent, not as a republican, the way I see it, it’s more of the same with McCain….

Posted by: matt l | October 27, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

@ LINDA/MICHIGAN – can you please describe for us how McCain has helped veterans? He openly opposes support to them by voting NO on critical bills in congress. also, can you please describe for us how McCain helped vietnam POWs? he openly supports keeping all records sealed that contain information about their status and whereabouts. mccain may support our active duty force by increasing defense spending but they seem to be a toy for him because once they are vets or pows he leaves them behind.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

The biased media was the biggest killer and I hope ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC pay dearly for stealing an election. You so call journalist should be ashamed of your unrelenting bias reporting. Obama had you all at Hello!!!

Posted by: Chernmax | October 27, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

liberal media bias? who do you think owns the 3 major networks? are Disney, General Electric and Westinghouse liberal corporations?
it is so so so tried and old to use this trumped-up lie to explain why mclame and whatsherface are going to lose lose lose. you should try to come up with something new.
oh, that’s right, you lemmings cannot think for yourselves.
oh, btw, fox is fox

Posted by: amazed | October 27, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

batesba74 – You call me muisguided, you are the one proposing more of the same policy that got us into this economic mess with stataements like this “Does it make sense that taxing the rich and Business will increase spending in the economy. Or grow jobs? If you say yes you are lying to yourself. ”
I simply remind you of the great Henry Ford when asked why he felt it was so important to pay his workers more than the prevailing wages of the day. He answered that simply with “Because that way they can afford to buy my product and we all gain from that.”
It is obvious to anyone understading economics that a prosporous middle class causes the standard of living to rise for everyone, especially the business secotr. The concept you propose, i.e. trickle-down economics has been proven time and time again to fail.
By making the wealthy and corporations pay their fair share, the tax burdon currently dumped on the middle-class by the Bush administration will be reversed. Families will have more disposable cash with which to buy products and therefore the economy will improve. It is in fact the only viable way out of the mess we are currently in.
Republicans really ought to go back and study sound economic theory, not the B.S. that Milton Friedman conned the country into believing.

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

You Obama fans are freaking me out. Who do you think he is? He’s nothing special like you all saying he is. your making it sound like he can walk on water come on people look at the true facts not the party.

Posted by: cathy | October 27, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Anyone who believes the media is not Biased and protecting Obama has no Idea what is going on and should not be allowed to vote because they are obviously ignorant to the facts!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

McCain is an angry, erratic, old geezer with impaired judgement. Hardly someone we need as President. And if he dies, we would have an inexperienced, Nut-case Separatist who, “on a clear day,” can see Russia. Only her followers are scarier than Palin.

Posted by: Sammy | October 27, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Palin is McCain’s biggest mistake. her folksy , whiney voice grates on my nerves, so much so that I now pick up the remote and change TV channels whenever I hear he voice !

Posted by: Sue | October 27, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

@ LINDA/MICHIGAN
If you really care for the people serving this great nation, you should also care for the fact that their life is not something to be used for political gains.You should ask this question to Bush and Cheny and supported by Mcain and held them accountable for thousands of lives in Iraq for their vested interests.Souls of those soldiers will not pardon you if you support these politicians for lying to you about this war in iraq in the name of al quieda.If we had spend one in 10th of that money we spend in iraq in Afghanistan and Pakisthan we would have got the man we wanted by now and bring back our soldoers in glory by now.Instead what we are doing is sacrificing precious american lives in iraq in the name of peacekeeping while Iraq is repeatedly asking us to get lost from there.

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

@ CATHY and BATESBA74 – you guys are like little mccain clones. hardly any mccain supportes on this blog (or anywhere else i visit) says what mccain is going to do or how he’s going to do it. all you seem to have to say is “obama this” “obama that” “obama supporters this.” are you sure you’re not supporting obama rather than mccain?

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

batesba74
You are losing it now with statements like “Anyone who believes the media is not Biased and protecting Obama has no Idea what is going on and should not be allowed to vote because they are obviously ignorant to the facts!”
Typical republican thought process, they don’t agee with me. I better find a way to keep them from voting.
Presuming your moniker means you are a BA graduate of Bates College in ’74 I feel bad because you give the school a terrible name. My father in law was a Bates graduate in ’57, still living in Maine and he would be ashamed to have you associated to the school for posting so innanely.

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

@ BATESBA74 – if the media is so biased, please tell us where to get the facts. i want to hear your answer so i can go there and see what they are. where do you get your facts?

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

ldk is it because I’m on cnn that you think I’m supporting obama? Well, I like cnn and I can see through who thier bosses are.

Posted by: cathy | October 27, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Why blame the media for giving McCain/palin more negative coverage when McCain/palin cant stop feeding them fodder for negative coverage – “i can see Russia from my house”, the $150,000 wardrobe (hockey mom, yeah right !),etc, etc.

Posted by: Sue | October 27, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Chernmax – You forgot to mention Fox too. They have been dissing the Mccain Palin ticket too.

Posted by: Yes_We_Will | October 27, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

ldk is it because I’m on cnn that you think I’m supporting obama? Well, I like cnn and I can see through who thier bosses are.
Cathy ..are you on cnn or abc?I am confused as to where I am on now.I thought I am on abc news blos spot.

Posted by: swingvoter1971 | October 27, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

@ CATHY – i’m not sure what youre referring to. we’re on an abcnews site right now. and no i dont think you supporting obama.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

IDK..
I think cathy and batesba are one person.lol..cathy id for cnn and batesba for abc..Now whoever he or she is ..they are confused which id created for where..lol

Posted by: swingvoter1971 | October 27, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Rightwingers are such morons supporting Father Time and Caribou Barbie. Only the deluded sheep like Rightwingers support the worst of the worst. Go away Rightwing losers leave my country please!Go form your own racist warmongering Taliban nation. You know you want too!

Posted by: AJ | October 27, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

@ BATESBA74 – would really like to know where you go to to get the facts since the media is so biased. i’d like to see what they are.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

@ SWINGVOTER – it certainly looks that way, but i’d still like to know their answer – if media is so biased, where do we go for info that can be trusted?

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

YES_WE_WILL: Okay McCain is not the same as Bush so get that out of your head. McCain is giving tax cuts to the middle class as well it is funny how you forget this fact and never mention it. It is McCain who wants to double the Child tax Credit, It is McCain who wants to give Business an incentive to Pay more and create Jobs. McCain is of the opinion you cant penalize Business and expect them to compete in a world economy and create jobs at the same time. How in the heck is raising taxes on these companies going to create jobs? How is this going to increase wages? How is this going to make American business more competitive in the world. Everybody wants to make more money but American wages are higher than the wages of our competitors and you cant pay more in wages and taxes and expect to compete you cant accomplish this. Again you penalize Business they will pass this on to us. So yes you are mis guided and you want to talk quotes. This is what Thomas Jefferson said about the redistribution of wealth Obama supports: “A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Let me guess Fax News and Republican hate radio is “fair and balanced” Give me a break! Unfair and unbalanced 100% of the time just like their lemming GOP Zombies!Go away please!

Posted by: AJ | October 27, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Obama is a ceceiver:
Says he is a Christian but “beleives there are many paths to God” – not what Christ said!
Says he want to reduce number of abortions – But “my first priority it to pass FOCA” which will supercede ALL state laws restricting abortion, even those in line w/ Roe v Wade.
Says he is African American when his geneology shows only 6.25% – not enough to be African American by USA Department of State. Remember, he’s 50% white! He would actually be the first Arab American POTUS.
He is the most liberal member of the US Senate. What will his probable 2-3 Supreme Court nominees look like?

Posted by: WLT in KS | October 27, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

one more brains has come back in fad for the presidency.

Posted by: dl | October 27, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

ALl you need is 2
1) The left wing biased media is in the tank for Obama
2) Voter Fraud
Lets see if ABC news talks about this: Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered.

Posted by: Sal P NJ | October 27, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Right-wing fretting over “media bias” brings this question to mind: discounting the possibility of some sinister covert worldwide plot, I wonder if the reason Sen. Obama is getting more and better coverage than his opponent is because those in the media believe their audience is more interested in Obama, and are simply responding, as intelligent merchants do, to this belief?

Posted by: michael | October 27, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

So:
If Obama wins – America and the world loses! Obama would have to face the world as it is today, in crisis, and use his inexperience and poor judgment to make it even worse! The erratic Biden would be no help and neither would Reid, Pelosi, Frank and Co!
Or:
An apathetic America chooses an American idol!
The money changers win over the authentic social changers!
Dictatorship wins over freedom!
Mr. Cool’s frozen anger and rhetoric wins over action to empower Americans!
Give-a-ways that dehumanize Americans wins over creative steps for growth and a stronger America!
A weaker America with a weakened military and a much larger deficit wins over policies that keep America safe, healthy, growing and reaching out to the least of these!
A global depression wins over a sensible recovery of the economy!
And, Republicans will win big in 2012, 2016……..!
Sarah Palin 2012 and 2016! She is a true reformer and force for authentic social change!
And, Camp Obama plus Media Obama knows it! Consequentially, they have attacked her like a bunch of thugs!
Obama is just another arrogant, palm greasing money changer who “masquerades as an angel of light,” 2 Cor. 11:14!
He would be swept out of the temple!

Posted by: aware2u | October 27, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

The real reason McCain is loosing is Hannity, Levin and Limbaugh, who ripped him to pieces during the primaries. These guys (and Fox) decided that he wasn’t worth voting for. The conservative right eat their young and then spit them out. Just remember the backlash to Bill Clinton’s famous “Give me a break” speech. Democrates don’t tolerate destroying their candidates personally. Only Republicans have taken it to a new level, leaving a broken message, no one can understand.

Posted by: MNnice | October 27, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

My 2 cents on why McCain is unelectable:
1. The economic/political environment and McCain representing the Republican party gave him one red flag.
2. His inability to demonstrate a economic policy difference from George Bush, as well as his comments about the “strong fundamentals of the economy” created a flashback to Katrina, which raised a second red flag.
3. The Palin pick as VP was definitely unconventional and definitely was a game changer. However, and the fact that he did not vet her raised questions in the back of everyone’s mind about his judgment, which raised the third red-flag.
4. McCain’s actions – suspending his Campaign and the threat of not debating Senator Obama after the Financial crisis raised the fourth red-flag.
5. Palin’s performance in the Katie Couric interview raised the fifth red flags.
At that point, Obama had to only prove that he was acceptable. Because, McCain had proven to be too unpredictable and Americans don’t want “risk takers” after they had lost $8 Trillion dollars in the stock market.

Posted by: r-dub | October 27, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

As a patriot I have served my country for literally all of my adult life, but if Palin ever gets to be President I am leaving the country. Not merely because she will be president, but mainly because the country will be full of idiots.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

My 2 cents on why McCain is unelectable:
1. The economic/political environment and McCain representing the Republican party gave him one red flag.
2. His inability to demonstrate a economic policy difference from George Bush, as well as his comments about the “strong fundamentals of the economy” created a flashback to Katrina, which raised a second red flag.
3. The Palin pick as VP was definitely unconventional and definitely was a game changer. However, and the fact that he did not vet her raised questions in the back of everyone’s mind about his judgment, which raised the third red-flag.
4. McCain’s actions – suspending his Campaign and the threat of not debating Senator Obama after the Financial crisis raised the fourth red-flag.
5. Palin’s performance in the Katie Couric interview raised the fifth red flags.
At that point, Obama had to only prove that he was acceptable. Because, McCain had proven to be too unpredictable and Americans don’t want “risk takers” after they had lost $8 Trillion in the stock market.

Posted by: r-dub | October 27, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

McCain needs to settle down before he has a stroke. Seriously, I’m worried about his health..

Posted by: Dr Rich | October 27, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

@aware2u..God Bless! May your wish come true.May Palin and her honesty be true and if it is true..may god bless her be the president of america in 2012 and 2016.If not true may god also bless her and tell her not to be in politics anymore.

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I think choosing Sarah Palin should amount to more than 7% of the reason that John McCain will loose. I’m a Democrat and will vote for Barack Obama. If John McCain had selected Mitt Romney or someone else who had knowledge and experience, I might have considered voting for him. McCain’s performance at the debates was deplorable but the straw that broke the camel’s back was when he selected Palin as his running mate. When she opened her mouth for the first time, America said “John, What were you thinking?”

Posted by: jonb2565 | October 27, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Sorry, I meant “lose.”

Posted by: jonb2565 | October 27, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

In a local restaurant my server had on an “Obama 08″ tie. I laughed as he had given away his political preference – just imagine the coincidence.
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in disbelief while I told him I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need – the homeless guy outside. The waiter angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I’ve decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was very grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment, I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was very angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient deserved the money more.
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application

Posted by: chris | October 27, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I’m with the UN – Please God, Let Obama win.

Posted by: ldk | October 27, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Lets get the pattern of the Obama Campaign: Joe the Plumber they didn’t like the question, they investigated him and attacked him in speeches and in the media. A presidential candidate attacking a citizen who disagrees with him. That sounds real American to me! This weekend Biden was interviewed in Florida and they did not like the line of questioning on it calling his plan socialism, and asking about Obama’s influence by Marxist. What was the response of the Obama Campaign, not allow them anymore interviews because they don’t want the media asking them tough questions. Obama’s plan cut of or attack anyone who understands your plan for what it is Socialism! Again I will say higher corporate taxes does not provide more jobs!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

hey dems why are all your feathers all fluffed up. Why so spooked McCains the good guy. I think its time to switch to water.

Posted by: cathy | October 27, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I was at Walmart today and the cashier was Mexican/American and she has six kids. She sounded like she had more experience then Caribou Barbie and she can see Mexico from her house too ! Vote for her!

Posted by: AJ | October 27, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Ah Chris, a very mature way to redistribute the wealth. Do you believe in Karma? That was pretty messed up. It’s a shame it’s not possible to put yourself in the waiter’s shoes. I hope he pi**ed in your food!

Posted by: jonb2565 | October 27, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

MCCAIN WIN LIKELY — YEP! — WHY? —- PEOPLE DON’T CARE ABOUT ISRI-DERIVED DATA-BASED GOBBLE-DEE-KOOK HEADLINES. THEIR EXPERIMENT DESIGN NEGLECTS TO CONSIDER NULL SET THEORY — PERHAPS ABC’s PRESIDENT– SHOULD HAVE STUCK TO GWU AND HARVARD — INSTEAD OF ACKNOWLEDGING YE OLD ALMA MATTER –

Posted by: Wisdom | October 27, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

who can save John Mcain in this election?Dobson?Can he bring rain goddess to come and shower on election day?

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

THAT IS — I CERTAINLY DON’T ASSOCIATE MCCAIN WITH BUSH — NIGHT AND DAY –

Posted by: Wisdom | October 27, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

If you all think the media is choosing this election you are as usual grasping for straws as repubs usually do. We the people will be casting our ballots not they the media. If your candidate could have done ANYTHING right from picking a V.P. to finding a message besides the attack,attack,attack method maybe the media could have written something good about him, you have to give good to get good! Go over to FOX and they will skewer a story over and up for you and stop crying because you are loosing, McShame lost this for you NOT the media!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

LOL! for the life of me I really thought #2 read “BRAIN DAMAGE” ;-/

Posted by: Paula | October 27, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

This won’t take long. He missed the biggest factor: MEDIA BIAS !!!!

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

chris: did you give the tip to the homeless guy instead of your waiter because the service your waiter gave you was “sub par”? Or you just didnt’ like the fact that he thought different than you? Forget it, no need to answer that, I already know (your type).

Posted by: Paula | October 27, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

I guess I can survive the next four years with a Democratic Congress and President. Because after that they will be exposed for the Socialist Idiots they are and I will never have to deal with a Democratic congress or President for at least the next 3 elections after that! I bet Obama fails so quickly Hillary will be campaigning to be the Democratic nominee as early as Jan 2011. Obama will never get elected for a second term after his real agenda is exposed!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Reply to:
Posted by: batesba74 | Oct 27, 2008 3:51:34 PM
______________
I hope he (Obama) gets your address after he is elected maybe he can attack you next idiot!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

My wife and I debated who to vote for as time went along. We both agreed that the VP selection would influence our decisions. When John McCain picked Palin for VP, that killed our votes for McCain, period. We both felt that went to the heart of judgment on McCain’s part. Poor judgment in our opinions and a desire on his part to be the “maverick” with his party instead of picking someone like Romney, etc. What else is he going to be a maverick on? National security? The war in Iraq? Social security? It seems to us that his being maverick is random, you never know when he is going to go there. Scary for both of us.

Posted by: TJ | October 27, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I just had a thought…In eight days this will be all over, and hopefully, if Americans do their research and vote for Obama…
We will never have to hear Palin’s sarcastic whiney voice ever again.
That is enough to get my vote. HAHAHA
Don’t forget to mention Obama’s ” look at me, ain’t I great” walk!!!

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

waiter is smart.he is hellbent on getting rewarded for his services.What he did was sneaked thru the back door and posed as a homeless guy to make sure poor man’s wealth is not distributed.

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Who it thier right mind would talk to a terrorist? Who in thier right mind would go to a church with a pastor that spoke like he did for 20 years if he did’nt agree with him. Who in thier right mind would follow Fericon or what ever his name is. These Three men (to name a few) are not NORMAL people you actually learn something from thats helpful to the American people.

Posted by: katie | October 27, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Didn’t we just have a redistribution of wealth: AIG, Fannie, Freddie, GM, banks, stock brokerage, not to mention the military-industrial complex that is winning big with two wars (one of em bogus.)
Why would a conservative who doesn’t have two nickols to rub together get hysterical about some of that wealth actually trickling down?

Posted by: Stevie B | October 27, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Reply to:
As a patriot I have served my country for literally all of my adult life, but if Palin ever gets to be President I am leaving the country. Not merely because she will be president, but mainly because the country will be full of idiots.
Posted by: ldk | Oct 27, 2008 3:37:37 PM
_____________________
Unfortunately its to late, the idiots hath commeth and seem to be all on this blog! Seems we Dems are now “ruffling a feathers” ourselves!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Let me guess Fax News and Republican hate radio is “fair and balanced” Give me a break! Unfair and unbalanced 100% of the time just like their lemming GOP Zombies!Go away please! Posted by: AJ | Oct 27, 2008 3:26:59 PM: Compared to ABC CBS MSNBC and CNN, Fox is the the most balanced reporting out there they have called out McCain on his mistakes and have actually had a Democrat on the station from time to time. Just because they are the only one out there telling us about Obama and his extreme associations does not make them biased it makes them reporters!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

breaking news..New ad just came out in swing states connecting Obama and Wright.let us all watch sean hannity show this evening..

Posted by: moderaterepublican | October 27, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

all the mavericks in the house put your hands up and around your back and get handcuffed and go straight to jail for treason..you anti american losers

Posted by: 2012 ufo's are real | October 27, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

It shocks me to hear one say the media has nothing to do with it. I think that is ludicrous. The majority of voters rely soley on the media for their overall opinion of both candidates. the select few atcually dig into history and READ. I also think the election is a lot closer than people think. It will be interesting to see if the Obama band wagon will actuall go out and vote because we all know the conservative party and the rich will go out this election. Especially since Obama plans on having government control the rich peoples money… smart thinking 95 percent of the country will have lower taxes but dumb thinking it will confirm his victory.

Posted by: Austin | October 27, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

jpnb2565 I think yo may have read Chris’s post wrong. What whe was trying to point out is how taxpayers would react to Obama’ plan of “spread the wealth.” Go back and rad the post again.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

To aware2u – Please be right about Palin running. She’s such a mediocrity that she’ll bury the GOP for a generation if she runs. No one with a brin will vote for her. PLEASE BE RIGHT! Obama 08/12, Clinton 16/20!

Posted by: Mike10648 | October 27, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

That was a story I received in an email this morning. I have waited tables before….and would never do that to any one regardless of the service received. It’s a simplistic yet dramatic way to get the point across in regards to what distribution of wealth is. I didn’t think I had to point out that it was an analogy.

Posted by: chris | October 27, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

His age has alot to do with it,anger has its place and I think by watching him he has the start of dementia…..

Posted by: NH voter | October 27, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Reply To:
Who it thier right mind would talk to a terrorist? Who in thier right mind would go to a church with a pastor that spoke like he did for 20 years if he did’nt agree with him. Who in thier right mind would follow Fericon or what ever his name is. These Three men (to name a few) are not NORMAL people you actually learn something from thats helpful to the American people.
Posted by: katie | Oct 27, 2008 4:11:02 PM
________________
Who in their right mind would vote for a 72 yr. old man with skin cancer who’s back up is a 44 yr. old idiot who’s husband belongs to AIP (Alaska Independence Party) that wants to succeed from the union (United States) whose teenage daughter is pregnant because the creationists don’t believe in sex education or birth control. Who in their right mind would vote for a man who voted for and with the current disaster of a president 92% of the time and wants to continue those bad policies for another 4 yrs. Who in their right mind would vote for a man with 9 houses, servants, 12 cars and millions upon millions of dollars and expect him to be able to understand and do anything about the issues facing the middle class? Not to mention the keating five, G. Gordon Liddy, and all the lobyists that run his campaign. You are correct to say Who in their right mind would vote for any of that!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

chris, trying having an original thought once in a while. This is the problem with Republicans. They CAN’T seem to think for themselves, they can only REPEAT what they hear on FOX and read in their emails.

Posted by: Paula | October 27, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

all the mavericks in the house put your hands up and around your back and get handcuffed and go straight to jail for treason..you anti american losers

Posted by: 2012 ufo's are real | October 27, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Great now can we get Mike Murphy’s take on why Obama will lose??? C’mon ABC you can at least feign interest and practice for your complicance in Obama’s “Fairness Doctrine”!!!

Posted by: hmn | October 27, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

It’s “Progressive Tax” from the early history of Capitalism — NOT Socialism and the Redistribution of Wealth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_tax

Posted by: Paula | October 27, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

If you all think the media is choosing this election you are as usual grasping for straws as repubs usually do. We the people will be casting our ballots not they the media. If your candidate could have done ANYTHING right from picking a V.P. to finding a message besides the attack,attack,attack method maybe the media could have written something good about him, you have to give good to get good! Go over to FOX and they will skewer a story over and up for you and stop crying because you are loosing, McShame lost this for you NOT the media!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Objective this man is NOT… How can Dowd work for ABC and still be an operative for Obama at the same time. Looks like McCain’s “friends” in the media have abandoned him. That’s what you get for selling out to Democrats John!!! Be prepared to earn your much deserved but whoopin’!

Posted by: hmn | October 27, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Posted by: it’s over! | Oct 27, 2008 4:07:35 PM: Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah! Typical liberal you love America as long as everyone in it agrees with your views! I don’t see McCain attacking individual voters in the Media for asking him a question, I don’t see McCain telling reporters they will have no more interviews because your questions are to tough and expose me! McCain has nothing to hid and Obama does and it is starting to leak out bit by bit but unfortunately for all Americans it is going to be to late. All I will be able to tell you a year from now is I told you so! Democrats don’t want facts or truth they want pie in the sky speeches that amount to nothing.

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Watch “Hacking Democracy” Yeah surre… Your vote will be counted, just like ’00 and ’04, PLEASE!

Posted by: hmn | October 27, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Wow the ignorance of the right wingers still astound me. Party of mostly racist hiding behind the holy than thou bs. I live in TN and everyday on my way into work I deal with a variety of lunnies with McCain Palin stickers. The tone of intolerance in the conservative base is frightining, I know my wife won’t let me put my obama signs up because of the threats. These type of people are a dying breed and the sooner we sweep that creed out of our politics the sooner OUR GREAT COUNTRY can move foward. McCain is just an idiot “My Friends, My Friends, I know barrack said he won’t raise your taxes but I am telling he will and when I am president I will find those Weapons of Mass destruction in Iraq, my friends I will also promise to be completly healthy so that my vice president won’t get an early promotion.”
My democratic friends lets us just remember these are the same idiots who said in 2000 that GWB would be a better Pres than John. These are also the same idiots that put GWB in for 2nd term. We see that they have not gotten any smarter. Discount their hate and their fear of change, tell them to read the book “Who moved my Cheese?” it can help them over come these fears and maybe just maybe they might be a little smarter, but don’t hold your breath.

Posted by: greg | October 27, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

paula please tell me what sort of research you have done besides the news or t.v. Tell me about the research you have done on Bill Ayers, the “Weathermen”, ACORN, Wade Rathke etc.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

all the mavericks in the house put your hands up and around your back and get handcuffed and go straight to jail for treason..you anti american losers

Posted by: 2012 ufo's are real | October 27, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Reply to:
Posted by: batesba74 | Oct 27, 2008 4:27:15 PM
_________________
Oh Yes batesba we are all aware of the typical repub rhetoric, no one but you loves America, no one but you has a God that matters, no one but you is smart enough to figure it all out! WHEW it must be hard to be you and carry all that weight around your neck. That is the real reason the repubs are going to lose, we are all so sick of your high and mighty act we cannot wait to see you all pack your bags and abandon the country only “YOU” love! You are pathetic!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

batesba74 – regarding your #6 on the Top 8 Reasons Obama will win!
(6. Race: wining the African American vote 99% to 1% but that is not reverse racism!)…
you do realize that african americans represent only 12.85% (~40MM) of the total US population of 303,824,640 compared to 79.96% white (~243MM). so, do you honestly believe that even if EVERY single african american in the country voted for Obama he’d have enough votes to win the election based on their vote alone???

Posted by: monticelloroad | October 27, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

greg what the majority of people don’t understand is that WMDs don’t have to be nuclear. Husssein killed thousand of kurds without nuclear weapons. Still people thind of nuclear when they hear “weapons of mass destruction.”

Posted by: larry dean beard | October 27, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

So Katie!..
No talk with crazy people, you say..
Which brings us to the governor Palin and her husband dreams about independent state of Alaska. If crazy lady decides to run for The President in 2012 we’ll have all the media talking about Alaska independent party and its crazy boss all over again ;))) It is going to be interesting…

Posted by: ghost | October 27, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A jury found U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska guilty Monday of all seven counts in his federal corruption trial.
Sen. Ted Stevens leaving federal court Monday as the jury deliberated in his corruption trial.
Sen. Ted Stevens leaving federal court Monday as the jury deliberated in his corruption trial.
The jury found Stevens guilty of “knowingly and willfully” scheming to conceal on Senate disclosure forms more than $250,000 in home renovations and other gifts from an Alaska-based oil industry contractor.
Stevens faces a maximum sentence of up to to 35 years in prison — five years for each of the seven counts.
Hold on to your hats Palin lovers because the same contractors were used by Todd Palin to build their house in order to win the bid to build the sports park in Alaska and they cannot come up with any records of being paid by the Palins. Sorry Sara will be the 2nd politician in Alaska to be found guilty of corruption soon!

Posted by: it's over! | October 27, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Who in their right mind would vote for inexperience senator who has accomplished nothing in his career! Who in their right mind would vote for a man whose wife hates American and has never been proud of her country. Who in their right mind would vote for a President who is them most liberal member of the senate with no track record of working across the Isle. Who in their right mind would vote for someone who was second in contributions from Freddie and Fannie and first from Lehman brothers in just 4 years as a senator. Who would vote for a man who has raised money for, received money from and was endorsed by ACORN a organization he worked for and trained. An organization who is accused of voter fraud in most battle ground states! Who in their right mind would vote for a man who would sit down with leaders of hostile nations without precondition! Who in their right mind would vote for a man who does not consider Iran a serious threat to the United States! Who in there right mind would vote for a man who does not even understand the Russia / Georgia crisis. Who in their right mind would vote for a man who not only wants to share the wealth with all Americans but share our wealth with poorer countries as well! Who in their right mind would vote for a man who wants to cut defense spending after 9/11. Who in their right mind would vote for a man who is so knowledgeable on history but thinks we are naive enough not to see the problem with his relationship with a domestic terrorist. Who in their right mind would vote for a man who attacks ordinary Americans who question his policy! Who in their right mind would vote for a man who is going to be tested by the world! Who in their right mind would vote for a man who wont talk to the media because they want to know the truth. Who in their right mind would vote for a man picked an protected by the media! And don’t claim he has not been! that argument holds no water because 18 million Clinton supporters were claiming a Obama media bias and protected him. Fact is Hilary was correct and so was Biden This man is not ready to lead and his views are extreme and dangerous for America. If he answers that phone at 3am we will not see a 4am!

Posted by: batesba74 | October 27, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

larry dean beard :
Then liberation of Iraq is what should of been sold to the American Public, not WMD. and if we our discusing genocide there are a dozen countries that wanted our help, meanwhile my brother is trooping around a desert with no clear understanding why he is there.

Posted by: greg | October 27, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

You want to talk about lies? Obama claims that 95% of Americans will get a taxcut. THAT IS A FLAT OUT LIE

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Obama and the left Democrats will transform our country from the USA to the SSA – Socialist States of America. I am not drinking the Kool Aid! Redistribution of wealth, negotiating with terrorists, and a pro-choice…correction pro-DEATH stance! What is happening to capitalism free speech and the second ammendment? It will be gone in an Obama administration. I don’t like either choice…McCain or Obama, but I’ll take McCain over Obama any day!

Posted by: Not Drinking the Kool Aid! | October 27, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Hey Greg, maybe you should tell your brother to ask the 76% of troops that would vote McCain as president why they are there. Maybe he shouldn’t have signed up to go in the first place. I know for a fact GW Bush didn’t make your brother go.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Jimmy
you can read both of their plans and see it is you who is full of bologna!

Posted by: greg | October 27, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Redistribution of wealth is Obama’s way of helping out poor and lazy people, rather than having them get a job. I guarantee the unemployment rate reaching an all-time high while Obama is in office.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

all the mavericks in the house put your hands up and around your back and get handcuffed and go straight to jail for treason..you anti american losers

Posted by: 2012 ufo's are real | October 27, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama’s plan is a lie. You will see it first hand when he wins.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Paula – tell me why Obama should be the next president of the United States just based on his policies. Please don’t include the he’s better than John McCain, we need a change from the last 8 years (which is true…i don’t think anyone will disagree with that). Just based on policy….why should he be in office?

Posted by: Chris | October 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

greg stay on the subject. What I said was that Hussin killed thousands of Kurds with chemical weapons and did not use nuclear. Chemical weapons are weapons of mass destruction but whenever someone hears “weapons of mass destruction” they automatically think of nuclear.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Obama is going to be a disaster.

Posted by: Romney in 2012 | October 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

greg I have a son on his second tour and he knows exactly why he is there!!!

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

jimmy,
wow, first let’s take a look at an intresting fact. More soliders have donated to Obama. wow. also all of the military families I talk to they are not supporting McCain. In fact back during the primaries I sought out my brothers opinion because I wished to vote in way that will help him. He was for Hilliary but Barrack is still better than McCain.

Posted by: greg | October 27, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Greg, you want a fact? Go look at the FACT that they polled the troops at war right now, and McCain won overwhelmingly. Don’t spout off facts until you know them. Your brother’s opinion is his own and it is his right to have one, but the troops at war right now went there willingly. They are there for a reason, and it is a reason that your liberal, hippie brain couldn’t possibly understand.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Who in their right mind would vote for someone that only has lies to offer and whose supporters repeat these lies?
Go Obama!

Posted by: rnrstar | October 27, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

greg Tell me where you obtained your “fact” about the soldiers being for Obama.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

And if you talked to any of these military families that actually had a military background, they are not supporting Obama. Only families of those kids that were screw-ups want their kids home for the wrong reasons. ANyone with a true military background understand why our country is at war right now.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I think the disillusionment with, and rejection of, the GOP stems from its leadership violating its own principles.
In the past 8 years we have seen government grow bigger than ever along with spending that would make a liberal blush.
Voting for this incarnation of the Republican party is a vote for what it was, not what it is now.

Posted by: Stevie B | October 27, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Jimmy greg is apparently like a lot of people. he seems to be an Obamaholic blinded by the Obama kool-aide.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

greg maybe your brother doesn’t completely understand why he is over there, but something inside him told him it was the right thing and he had the courage to do something about it. How about you?

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

greg No one made him enlist, it was his own choosing.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

When Obama is elected, I’ll tell you what the future holds for all of us. And it isn’t pretty.
Sean Hannity will have such a severe coronary that his heart will disintegrate.
Rush Limbaugh will take over the world record for “world’s fattest human being” as well as “world’s biggest pain pill overdose”.
Bill O’Reilly’s head will explode on his FIXED NEWS show.
Ann Coulter’s inner “beauty” will show through as she transforms into a big fat ugly bitch.
Rick Davis will get a job selling subprime mortgages to loser Republicans.
Sarah Palin will go completely insane.
and finally,
John McCain will go to anger management training – as mandated by the courts – after calling Cindy the “C” word one time too many.

Posted by: zed | October 27, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Greg, let me help you out. We are at war because terrorist groups attacked our country, killing thousands of Americans on our soil. GW Bush, a republican, took us to war. In Vietnam, how many attacks were there on our country? Yet a Democrat led us to a war and no media outcry. Those are facts dude.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 27, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

If this article is true then it is time for us to say Good-Bye to a lot of things:
1. Goodbye to Bush
2. Goodbye to our right to bear arms
3. Goodbye to our retirement accounts (Obama plans on confiscating them)
4. Goodbye to privately owned business (Marxist society does not alow it)
5. Goodbye to the American Dream (you will be provided with government housing)
6. Goodbye to our Constitution.
AND SADDEST OF ALL:
7. GOODBYE TO THE USA!
The consequences of this election are far more reaching then either side realizes.
And in the end, we will have only ourselves and our left-wing media to blame.
Oh, by the way, you media types with the huge celebrity salaries…Forget it. When the Government formally takes over the media, you will get the same government mandated salary as every else.
You fools.

Posted by: Dr Julian | October 27, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Jimmy, in high school I had a notebook with a cover that said “Bomb Hanoi.” I then volunteered and served in the U.S. Army for four years, including a year in Vietnam. It didn’t take long for me to realize how misguided, mismanaged useless and wasteful the whole thing was. I’m still able to recognize a hoax today.

Posted by: Stevie B | October 27, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

zed you can tell the future? Let me try. If Obama gets in I predict all the Obamaholics will be screaming after he screws the whole country up.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

stevie b I was there too but Vietnam is different from Iraq. Vietnam was a peninsula. where were the communists going to go? Into the sea. Same with Korea. both of these wars wer started under a democratic president. Iraq is totally different. If Iraq falls and entire region is up for grabs.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I can only hope and pray that McCain loses! The man is a senileold hot head. And Palin is a joke.

Posted by: roseb6889 | October 27, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

QUOTES ABOUT ANOTHER COMMUNITY ORGANIZER AND “SOCIALIST”; (dont tell Fax News)!
“Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
-Proverbs 31:8-9
“No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money.”
-Matthew 6:24
“Then Jesus said to his disciples, ‘I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.’”
-Matthew 19:23-24

Posted by: philosopherkingtomas | October 27, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

For all the foolish Republican pultroons who have taken such umbrage at the “redistribution of wealth” comment………Apparently, you don’t realize W. redistributed your wealth over the last 8 years. You haven’t noticed? Not very observant!

Posted by: Sammy | October 27, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Here in Iowa we can vote early. Today I cast my vote for Obama, and do I feel good!!!

Posted by: Vicki | October 27, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

What relly is unfair is that if the Obamaholics get their way all of us have to suffer.

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Here in Iowa we can vote early. Today I cast my vote for Obama/Biden, and do I feel good!!!

Posted by: Vicki | October 27, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Vickie You feel good?? Must be really hitting that Obama kool-aide!!!!

Posted by: larry | October 27, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

I find it extremely difficult to believe that all the polls are VASTLY overstating Obama’s lead. Certainly there is a margin of error and some polls may slant one way or another, but even if you do the math and average all the polls, Obama still comes up more than the typical +/- 3% margin of error.

Posted by: usadcj | October 27, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

GUYS and GALS,
McCain does have one big ACE in the hole and Karl Rove’s computer expert, Mike Connell, knows who he is. He did help steal the 2004 election and the Supremes helped steal the 2000 one. Is 2008 really untouchable…FILM AT ELEVEN…

Posted by: daddyblue | October 27, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Boy it would be very interesting to know what daddyblue’s talking about. You wanna give us a hint big daddy?

Posted by: usadcj | October 27, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

If McCain is too old to be President, then Warren Buffett is too old to be in Obama’s cabinet. Buffett is in his 80s. It is sickening how Obama is using McCain’s age against him.

Posted by: Sam | October 27, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Past is prologue.
Why doesn’t Dowd say that Obama who has John G: where is your proff backing your statement that Senator Obama doesn’t believe in our Constitution?
When you state something like that that is so contrary to anything ever said by anyone including the person in question, you back it up? Failing to do so merely points out the sour grapes from you. Maybe you and McCain can go play golf after the election. One ridiculous liar should get along with another ridiculous liar!

Posted by: RaeD | October 27, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Hey you 3 or 4 deluded people who really think McCain’s gonna win, go to InTrade and put your money where your mouth is. McCain is scraping 12% in the prediction markets, so you can make some really really good money if he somehow manages to win this thing.

Posted by: seth | October 27, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Dowd/CNN
Please remove the “HATER” comment from your website.
Totally irresponsible to post this outrageous comment.
Thank you.

Posted by: lyn | October 27, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Those of you who are thinking that this will all be over on election day are fooling yourselves. With all the allegations of voter fraud during the primaries and now possible voter registration fraud in the general election – the results of this election are going to be bitterly contested much longer then Bush vs. Gore – no matter who “wins” on election day.

Posted by: My two cents | October 27, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

RaeD – Sen. Obama identifies himself with the Progressive Movement, as most Democrats do. The premise of the Progressive Movement is the belief that the constitution is a “fluid” document – that it can and should be changed to evolve with society. That belief is the opposite of the traditional Conservative Movement which believes the Constitution is a formal, unchangeable document that should serve as a guiding document for our country. Look up Progressive Movement and Conservative Movement – you’ll be surprised. Hillary Clinton gave a speech about it not too long ago. No one is saying that Obama wants to throw out the Constitution, but he has said had many comments where he clearly states that he believes parts of it should be changed, deleted or “re-interpreted” – that’s the issue.

Posted by: Howdy! | October 27, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

I couldn’t agree more “My two cents.” Obama has been a clever politician and his “closing arguments” ploy is another good one. This election is more than a week out and he is continuing to MANIPULATE the voting public; encouraging voters in Colorado to vote ealy, saying the election is over with the help of the media. What he is doing is simply stealing the average Joe’s vote, just like he totally mocked Joe the Plumber(obama is arrogant) and even tried to destroy Joe the Plumber.Obama is trying to steal the election before ANY NUMBER of things that can finally be proven will surface.He’s been like teflon so far but that will change,just like Biden predicted. He is desperately trying to get those votes in the box before people start to question him. It’s the salesman’s trademark;HURRY, SIGN ON THE DOTTED LINE; SEAL THE DEAL.This is why early voting was so unsound for the American populace. This is all par for the course with Obama. Hitler used very clever tactics and oratory as well. There are real similarities here, scary, but true. Hitler said that if you repeated a lie enough (McCain is George Bush) and it was a big enough lie, people would believe it.He has been consistent in his total manipulaton of the masses. I never would have believed in MASS HYSTERIA if I had not seen it, or MASS JEALOUSY as the women have displayed against Palin. This woman did not do anything so wrong to justify her treatment. It can only be chalked up to one thing. But one should never rule out the Christians and Dobson has weighed in with his letter of 2012. I suggest people read it, if they have not already sold their souls.

Posted by: notonmywatch | October 27, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The number 1 reason IF mcain looses will be the media.I have yet to hear Obama be asked a valid question beginning with “Who are you”?

Posted by: dennis gilmore | October 27, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Why is picking Palin a mistake? She is very capable, more than all those other guys.

Posted by: mary | October 27, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

5 reasons:
1.Media bias/stonewalling of impt. stories.
2.Obama campaign accepts non-eligible donations.
3.Secular liberals yearn for a messiah.
4.Sheeple always want to hang out with the “cool” guy.
5.Character doesn’t count anymore in too many peoples eyes

Posted by: PDH | October 27, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Frm Alper. Mark-your guide, You are truly pointing out and comparing what people are really missing. I LOVE IT. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!, it is not being a republican or democrat, it is about america and its’ steep falling very fast in front of the other nations and other countries. If you claim to be the leader of the world then pls, act like one.(for example: not by choosing a childish VP). To raise the credibility again with other nations USA needs a leader charismatic and honest and grown-up and young as well(who shouldn’t be thinking like my grandmother). Wake up America. Break your sea-shell and start swimming to see how others see you as a nation. If you really want to lead the world every single person have to be taught to be able to locate every country in the world. It shouldn’t be only your local interest when you chose the person as president. So choose a likeable one, not one just like another bush.

Posted by: Alper | October 27, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

As the earlier poster said, this ‘closing argument’ thing by Obama is all about the surfacing of interviews over the weekend in which he spouts off about ‘spreading the wealth’ that pre-date the Joe the Plumber stuff he said, it demonstrates that this has always been his deeply felt philosophy, and a video that the LA times is suppressing where he attends an event with those not so friendly to Israel that turns into what is described as a “Jew bash” –of COURSE he doesn’t want there to be anymore discussion, because these are big threats to his campaign. Remember this is how Hillary got shut/out while she was still campaigning–seems Obama has decided that theres no more need to talk about anything –and declaring its time to vote if you can vote early–just watch his staff do everything possible to get people to vote early, because Polls show that the race IS narrowing.

Posted by: Cha | October 27, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I’d say the #1 reason he’s going to lose is his choice of Palin. He was doing great in the polls just after he chose her, but as the country got to know her, he went way down in the polls.
While evangelicals and midwestern moms seem to really like her, most of the country sees her as inexperienced, unsophisticated, and too much of a religious fundamentalist. Many of the conservative columnists have said as much.

Posted by: KML | October 27, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

McCAIN DID NOT DISTANCE HIMSELF FROM BUSH HE AGREED WITH HIM UNTIL THE END
REPUBLICAN BRAND IS TARNISHED
PALIN PICK NOT COUNTRY FIRST
TOO MUCH FOR THE RICH I GUESS BECAUSE HE IS RICH

Posted by: MERLE7 | October 27, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

What did Sarah Palin say when she walked out to meet Joe Biden for the VP debate? “Hey, can I call you Joe?”
This is someone who isn’t ready to represent our country, meet foreign leaders, etc. She comes across as way too down-home and wet behind the ears. That’s nice for a talk-show host or head of the PTA, but not for a VP or, God forbid, President.
And you can be sure the foreign leaders have heard the interviews where she didn’t know what Bush doctrine was, and couldn’t name a single newspaper that she reads, or a single Supreme Court decision.
She just isn’t in the big leagues, and I can’t imagine she ever will be.

Posted by: Ella B. | October 27, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

all the mavericks in the house put your hands up and around your back and get handcuffed and go straight to jail for treason..you anti american losers

Posted by: 2012 ufo's are real | October 27, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Hey doom and gloomers… You’re so wrong!
All the dire circumstances you predict for an Obama presidency are just the moans and cries of folks who see the executive branch they thought they “owned” slipping away.
The country will be fine. It will actually get better.
Hope trumps despair. Faith trumps fear and love [also defined as charity] will always triumph over hate.
I hope you all participate in the good I predict.
God’s grace for us all — Americans.

Posted by: dassis | October 27, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

mccain is an ass hole why he pick sahra pilen is that hecouse she was hot. i mean that is the most stoped thing i ever seen in my life. he shoudn’t pick her must time she play so that is the most thing that hurt mccain please mccain kick sahra pilen from your ticket and we can win this election too.

Posted by: tomas smith | October 27, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

hi this election drives me crazy man mccain is really strong person and all this year i support jone mccain but it seems obama will talk it the election. becouse he is ten times power full of jone mccain and in every issue he has better answer so i sould vote obama mccain is down by all so sorry mccain and pailen.

Posted by: tomes | October 27, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

The financial meltdown played a much bigger role in McCain’s downhill slide. People associate him with Bush and realize that:
1) the Republicans have spent like drunken sailors in the last 8 years. Most of it was on a war which we never should have gotten into in the first place.
2) McCain wants to keep going with this war. He wants to keep sending billions of our dollars over there for a lost cause.
3) George Bush never vetoed a single spending bill that came out of Congress.
While Bill Clinton left us with a surplus, GWB has given us a HUGE deficit (money that we owe, mostly to China). And McCain has supported him 90% of the time.
4) McCain has always been massively in favor of deregulating Wall Street. That has been a huge factor in this whole economic mess. The financial institutions were able to get away with way too much.
And on and on and on. The Republicans have become the party of fiscal irresponsibility. The idea that Dems are the big spenders is an out-of-date delusion. While both parties share in the blame, the Republicans have been in charge for 8 years.
It’s time for a change, and McCain is not the one who can bring it about.
Obama/Biden ’08.

Posted by: John | October 27, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

hey dassis –
Really nice post!!
BB

Posted by: B.B. | October 27, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

even with obama’s lead i’m sure some how, some way they(republicians) will find a way to STEAL this election too!!!!!!

Posted by: tonia kc | October 27, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

> It’s curious to me why McCain’s
> supporters blame the media for his
> decline in the polls. McCain has failed
> to run a campaign worthy of his
> reputation. Don’t blame the media, blame
> the man. This campaign is McCain’s
> responsibility and he blew it.
They are going to blame it on Palin soon. She did not make the pick.

Posted by: pmp2008 | October 27, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

stevie b I was there too but Vietnam is different from Iraq. Vietnam was a peninsula. where were the communists going to go? Into the sea. Same with Korea. both of these wars wer started under a democratic president. Iraq is totally different. If Iraq falls and entire region is up for grabs.
– larry
Larry, the same thinking led America
to VN, remember Domino theory ?
Pulling out of VN was a winning strategy
for the US. The Chinese and Russia ended
up fighting for VN there and we achieve
our strategic goals.
You never win as an occupation force.
History repeats itself many times.

Posted by: pmp2008 | October 27, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I would like to add another reason that McCain will not win. The stretching of the truth by the Obama in regards to how bad Bush and McCain were doing the last 8 years.
1. According to a GAO report 61% of US corporations paid no federal taxes from 1996 to 2000. Looks to me that some ground work was done before Bush got into office. If you take a shot at McCain do not forget Biden.
2.The US government has been signing trade deals for over 40 years to open up more free trade. Not really created by Bush.
3. The WTO stops us every time we have attempted to make changes in the trade laws. Again not Bush all alone.
4. US Corporations do not get paid to move jobs overseas like everyone claims but rather they are not paying taxes since the products are not manufactured here. Another case of stretching the truth by the Obama team.
5. One of the real big issues is that many countries (at least 157) do not have income tax but rather a VAT. They pay on what they consume not what they make in income. This has nothing to do with Bush.
6. Burdens on many of our large manufactures for employee benefits for retire employees, (health and fixed retirements) makes it difficult to compete in the world markets, not just the low wages, employment practices and environmental concerns we have continued to hear from the DNC. The finger can not just be pointed at Bush and McCain.
7. Information out of the Obama camp talks about jobs going to third world countries and buying oil from enemies of our country. They never mention the jobs that went to Canada and oil we import from Canada. Don’t blame Bush.

Posted by: William | October 27, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Obama taught Constitutional Law at the prestigous economic law bastion University of Chicago School of Law.
Neither Bush, Cheney, or McCain went to law school. No wonder Bush has dissed the Constitution every chance he got.
To say that Obama would act unconstitutionally is a lie. After all, your Buddy Bush has violated his oath to uphold it and violated our rights. How could you ever have supported Bush when he acts unconstitutionally yet say Obama will act unconstitutionally? You are a fool. I am convinced the average American has no idea what his Constitutional rights are and wouldn’t know it if they smacked him in the face.

Posted by: Thomas | October 27, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Obama is educated, sincere, experienced, moral and a leader.
McCain is hot-headed, war-monger and out of touch with our country.
Biden will be helpful with his experience.
Palin is a disgrace to all American women!

Posted by: educated white woman | October 27, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

What I have noticed is so many more morons support McCain…
It is so apparent…
Get a grip you right wing morons

Posted by: bwaaaa | October 27, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I think Obama will lose the election.
The media behind Obama (ABC, NBC, CBS) are losing the plot, they dont have the power over the people they think they have.

Posted by: Greg h | October 27, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

If Obama wanted to emulate McCain’s attack ads, we would hear robocalls in the Heartland informing America’s patriots that McCain: a) was in the pocket of former Lincoln Savings & Loan president and convicted criminal Charles Keating; b) was buddies with fellow convicted criminal Republicans Ted Stevens, Tom Delay, Scooter Libby, Bob Allen, Trent Lott, Jack Abramoff, Don Young, Larry Craig, Randy “Duke” Cunningham, Tom Feeney, Alberto Gonzoles, Bob Ney, Rick Renzi, Richard Curtis, Steven Griles, Mark Foley…etc; c) accepted political donations from the Watergate convicted criminal G. Gordon Liddy; d) picked a runningmate mired in scandal (Troopergate) and has acted “unethical” according to her own people – - and doctored expense reports to bilk her taxpayers; e) gave up information to his communist captors in North Vietnam, whereas other American prisoners did NOT; McCain has a lot to answer for. You can’t call yourself a patriot while voting for criminals.

Posted by: umtomcat | October 28, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Wow! I, for one, would be terrified if Palin and McCain get in office. This is not a conservative/liberal, rural/elitist thing. This is a common sense thing. The last thing this nation needs is someone who feeds on division and accusations. Ayres? Come on…that’s like saying I am a drug-dealer because my ex-boyfriend back in junior high was convicted in high school, and now teaches kids to stay off of drugs. Oooh! Palin? That is a scary association. The woman cannot handle her own family let alone this nation (pregnant teenage daughter, overbearing husband). This is not gender specific. I am a working mother of three and I am more qualified than this ignorant woman to lead this nation. Should I? No and neither should she. Hillary would have been awesome, but I have grown to acknowledge the power of Obama (and no I am not referring to any supposed antichristian weirdness), and I feel we need someone calling for unity, intelligence and hope. Muslim? Who cares? If you do, then you are a sad sad individual and should pay more attention to religious teaching besides your own. I am a Christian but I feel no distrust of Muslims both here in the US and abroad. I have personally known people who practice Islam, and they are good Americans who cringe everytime someone makes anti-Islamic comments. We are not a Christian nation and people need to realize this. It is not a bad thing. It is as American as apple pie to practice according to your own beliefs. I, for one, would feel more comfortable if my president was an atheist or agnostic rather than suscribe to one religion over the other. Objectivity should be an important part of any elected official. Nevermind the hypocrites of both parties that claim Christianity and then pray at the feet of Wall Street. This country is nearly broken. We need a new agenda. We need new leadership. We need to get off our butts and make sure that whatever the outcome of this election, we are involved in our own governance. This was the intent of the founding fathers. GO VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Jenny | October 28, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

OBAMA WILL WIN BECAUSE ITS HIS TIME! MCCAN RAN AN HORRIBLE CAMPAIGN!

Posted by: veh | October 28, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Obama is shamelessly hitting on contributors by daily e-mails for donations. He’s the true American dream! Out spend your opponent and hurray for the guy with the most money. Obama is the supreme capitalist.
America deserves Obama! HA HA HA!!!!!

Posted by: shep | October 28, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

To Tom about “brain dead liberal college professors”–your remarks are DISGUSTINGLY INSULTING TO ALL THE UNDERPAID TEACHERS WORKING TO EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN.
As a college professor who takes her job exceedingly seriously,I don’t indoctrinate anyone–except to view the political process as important and to inform themselves,then vote their conscience. How Republican of you not to see that! When is the last time you actually sat in a college classroom? We spend our time trying to get your sons and daughters to work at learning (not to mention achieving excellence), have an open mind to the world of ideas, and catch up on the basics of learning; we don’t have time to indoctrinate anyone, because they are too far behind in reading, writing and thinking for such frivolity!

Posted by: annabel | October 28, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

I reject the idea that the media has won or lost this election for either candidate. Those who care to believe otherwise may have some kindred spirits, but I think most Americans are tuning out the shrill voices on the far left and far right and taking the time to discern the issues and cast their votes in an intelligent and thoughtful manner. I am aware of the issues raised for and against both candidates. I hear and read about them ever day. I live in a state (Texas) that McCain will carry. The Dallas Morning News endorsed McCain as have many other newspapers. The thing is that I was not persuaded by their endorsement. So while McCain may take Texas, he did not win my vote. Neither did the local Republican candidates in my county. I am conservative and an independent voter, but I do not agree with what McCain stands for. For me, Obama is the better leader for our country. I have many friends and acquaintances from my military service, college, etc and we are spread throughout the country. Most are voting for Obama. It wasn’t the media that tipped the balance. It was our own judgment of the candidates’ policies and plans for the future.

Posted by: in step | October 28, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

I am independent,born again christian.This is my comment.First George redeemed our country with war,last George ruined our country with war.Now the MAN is coming with peace in his mouth but war in mind.Let’s get ready!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Thomas Varghese | October 28, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

McCain has other issues…He has built his career by surrounding himself with lobbyists and special interests. The person he put in charge of his transisiton team (if he wins) is William Timmons, one of the capitol’s leading lobbyists! McCain’s life is so embedded with other people calling the shots, he wouldn’t be running this country—BIG BUSINESS would.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 28, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

In posting a comment on a sort-of related story (Michelle Obama’s Tonight Show video)see, a shaky connection at best, I tried to be fair as I discussed what I think matters and what I think is going to happen. To me, fair means not calling female VP candidates pigs, not refering to candidates with vulgar nicknames that do more to show the poster’s lack of intelligence than any real problem with said candidate (you know, BarackHusseinObama, for example. The ONLY reason you’re including his given middle name is for the play on Saddam’s last name. Otherwise, you’d use John McCain’s middle name in your posts, too. And John McLame. It really shows that you’re the one who’s ‘McLame’). Name-calling was suppose to go out of style when we got to the maturity level of our average middle-schooler. I hardly think it’s appropriate when we’re suppose to be intelligently picking our next leader. And just because your politics are different from the person who lives next door doesn’t mean that they are no longer intelligent. The gentleman who wrote this column, Matthew Dowd, made his last highly significant ‘front-line’ contribution to presidential politics as the chief stratagist for George W. Bush’s 2004 re-election campaign. I hated Bush’s 2004 re-election, because of what Bush did in the six months after he won his ‘mandate’, as he called it. In the following six months, he dumped all the conservative christians he used to win the states that gave him his victory. If not for ‘defense of marriage’ ballot measures in most battleground states, John Kerry would be running for re-election right now. That’s scarier than McCain or Obama, let me tell you. And that’s from a lifelong Democrat who gave him a pity vote only because I knew he wouldn’t win. If I thought I would’ve contributed to a Kerry presidency, I would’ve thrown my ballot (Oregon, we get them mailed to us) in the river. Anyway, once Bush dumped those conservative christians, most of them swore they’d never fall for that again (and I know from what I speak, for I spent 15 years (1990-2005) lying to my wife, because I thought she wouldn’t marry me if I wasn’t a ‘believer’. I was a great fake christian, but it wasn’t worth what I did to my wife, who forgave me only because she has the forgiveness of a true christian). Now, in 2008, McCain can’t even count on the evangelicals, because of the 2004 election burn. I found this post after posting my other comments, but I summed up by saying this:
Barack Obama is going to win this election on November 4th. There won’t be any ‘Bradley Effect’ or Tennessee Neo-Nazis getting in the way of his victory. John McCain isn’t going to lose because he would be a bad President. He’s going to lose because he represents a political party that most of America is ready to throw out of office, especially in national races. Yesterday, the longest-serving Republican in the Senate was convicted on all counts in his fraud trial. He has said that the conviction doesn’t mean he would be a poor choice for the Senate. Combine that attitude with an incumbent President who has trashed his party to the point that some republican Senate candidates are trying to run their campaign without using the word ‘Republican’. They are using the initials “G.O.P.”. And the courts must sympathize somewhat, because in Washington State, the Democrat running against such a Republican tried to force his opponent to be identified in the official ballot as ‘Republican’, and the court sided with the member of the “G.O.P.”. Apparently, as many as 20% of voters in Wash. St. are unaware that ‘Republican’ and ‘G.O.P.’ are the same party. I’d say that is one smart Republican, as he’s running neck-and-neck in recent polls with his opponent. I think Sen. Stevens would love those numbers right about now.
Anyhow, my main point is that it doesn’t matter what party someone supports. If pollsters, bloggers, and anonymous commenters talk intelligently about political races, rather than bathing in rhetoric, we can throw out a lot of the hate on the campaign trail. Mr. Dowd has given a shining example of how to intelligently talk about presidential politics. Thank you.

Posted by: Eric | October 28, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

What those who say the reason McCain is losing is that the media has treated him unfairly, are really saying, is that the majority of people are so stupid they can’t figure things out for themselves. As for their complaints that the media is biased against the republicans: perhaps, they should use a longer sampling period. After all, during the 2000 and 2004 elections, the major media all but ignored Bush’s lack of “apparent” intelligence. John McCain is actually quite boring compared with Bush. Up until he selected Sarah Palin, he had as good a chance as any one. But who but anyone just thinking of themselves is going to vote for a 72 year old who insults the intelligence of many of his supporters with such an idiotic choice for VP. Do people really expect to press to report that she is qualified when she is clearly not. (Isn’t that what FoxNews is for.)It may be true that Bush may not have even been qualified to be a VP– let alone president. But he was at least an order of a magnitude more qualified than Sarah Palin. And, as for the one-sided late night joke index– for obvious reasons, clowns get more laughs then lion tamers.

Posted by: jrc903 | October 28, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

WHAT IS THE US GOVERNMENT GOING TO DO ABOUT HEALTH CARE? READ THIS ARTICLE:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20081028/hl_hsn/medicaldebtsendingmanyoverfinancialbrink
THEY SAY WE LIVE IN THE BEST COUNTRY ON EARTH, BUT WE CANNOT AFFORD HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUMS. THAT IS A SHAME.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT LIKE WHAT THEY DID WITH THE BANKS ($700 BILLION).

Posted by: Patty | October 28, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

What was that saying about not fighting a two front war … or that one about being careful about what you wish for…
I think that the reason why McSame and the republican majority is in trouble are two fold. 1) they were idealistic and 2) they got exactly what they wished for… control. This is great if you are smart, lucky, and at the start of a pax romana, but lets face it. We are at the end of our glory years, which is not to say we aren’t a world power… we can still cause a holicaust, kick the ass of any country we want to, and cause the world economy to tank… but we have to be prepared to live with the consequence. And the consequence of two half assed wars is failure.. and there is nothing Americans hate more than a loser or a chump, which we have all become. So the concentration of power, arrogance and ignorance… (all Palin characteristics aka Hubris) has driven a point home. And we did it to ourselves. After all we got the government that we voted for & we now live in a world that has changed, which is scary and baffling. We no longer want the school jock to lead us the class nerd to explain things in terms we can understand. Good luck to Obama. FDR had a four terms and three or four meglo-maniacs to distract the country. The dems may regret the opportunity.

Posted by: Mattheus | October 28, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Here’s the guy that should be our first black president
BILL COSBY
‘They’re standing on the corner and they can’t speak English. I can’t even talk the way these people talk:
Why you ain’t,
Where you is,
What he drive,
Where he stay,
Where he work,
Who you be…
And I blamed the kid until I heard the mother talk.
And then I heard the father talk.
Everybody knows it’s important to speak English except these knuckleheads. You can’t be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth.
In fact, you will never get any kind of job making a decent living. People marched and were hit in the face with rocks to get an education, and now we’ve got these knuckleheads walking around. The lower economic people are not holding up their end in this deal.
These people are not parenting. They are buying things for kids. $500 sneakers for what??
And they won’t spend $200 for Hooked on Phonics.
I am talking about these people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit. Where were you when he was 2? Where were you when he was 12? Where were you when he was 18 and how come you didn’t know that he had a pistol?
And where is the father? Or who is his father?
People putting their clothes on backward:
Isn’t that a sign of something gone wrong?
People with their hats on backward, pants down around the crack, isn’t that a sign of something?
Or are you waiting for Jesus to pull his pants up?
Isn’t it a sign of something when she has her dress all the way up and got all type of needles [piercing] going through her body? What part of Africa did this come from?
We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don’t know a thing about Africa ..
With names like Shaniqua, Taliqua and Mohammed and all of that crap, and all of them are in jail.
Brown or black versus the Board of Education is no longer the white person’s problem.
We have got to take the neighborhood back.
People used to be ashamed. Today a woman has eight children with eight different ‘husbands’ — or men or whatever you call them now.
We have millionaire football players who cannot read.
We have million-dollar basketball players who can’t write two paragraphs. We, as black folks have to do a better job. Someone working at Wal-Mart with seven kids, you are hurting us.
We have to start holding each other to a higher standard
We cannot blame the white people any longer.’
Dr. William Henry ‘Bill’ Cosby, Jr., Ed.D.
WAY TO GO, BILL !!
It’s NOT about color…
It’s about behavior!!!
PASS THIS ON AMERICA !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: STOP BLAMING THE WHITE | October 28, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

About Obama: By Bill Brown of the Billy Graham Team
>
>
> Bill Brown, is a highly respected retired member of the Billy Graham
> team so, I take his assessment of Obama very seriously and for that
> reason accept his challenge to pass this on. I share his concern
> about the ‘rock star’ image Obama has and watch with growing concern
> at the celebrity status the media has foisted upon him. Here is hope
> this email informs you in a wise way.
> &nb sp;
> ________________________________
>
> The Obama Tidal Wave
>
> We are witnessing a political phenomenon with Barack Obama, of rare magnitude.
>
> His speeches have inspired millions and yet most of his followers have
> no idea of what he stands for except platitudes of ‘Change’ or that he
> says he will be a ‘Uniter’.
>
> The power of speech from a charismatic person truly can be a powerful
> thing. Certainly Billy Graham had charisma. Both his manner of
> speech and particularly the content changed millions.
>
> On the extreme other hand, the charisma of Adolph Hitler, too,
> inspired millions and the results were catastrophic..
>
> Barack Obama certainly is no Hitler or Billy Graham, but for many
> Americans riding on the Obama Tidal Wave, is just like a surfer who
> might be ecstatic and euphoric while riding a tidal wave, but the
> reality of the ride is what happens when it hits shore.
>
> Just Some of What Defines Barack Obama:
>
>
>
> A. He voted for partial birth abortion
>
> A.He voted against the Born Alive infant Protection Act
> (BAIPA) – a law that
>
> would provide medical attention for infants who were
> born alive after a botched
>
> abortion. (This constitutes infantacide)
>
> A. He voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get
> out-of-state abortions.
>
> A. Supports affirmative action in Colleges and Government (quotas)..
>
> A. In 2001 he questioned harsh penalties for drug-dealing as
> being too severe.
>
> A. Says he will deal with street-level drug-dealing as a
> minimum-wage affair.
>
> A. Admitted his use of marijuana and cocaine in high school
> and in college.
>
> A. His religious convictions are very murky.
>
> A. He is willing to meet with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim
> Jung Il and
>
> Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions.
>
> A. Has said that one of his first goals after being elected
> would be to have a
>
> conference with all Muslim Nations
>
> A. Opposed the Patriot Act.
>
> A. First bill he signed that was ever passed was campaign
> finance reform.
>
> A. Voted to allow law suits against gun manufacturers.
>
> A. Supports universal health-care.
>
> A. Voted YES on providing habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees.
>
> A. Supports granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants.
>
> A. Supports extending welfare to illegal immigrants.
>
> A. Voted YES on comprehensive immigration reform.
>
> A. Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in
> Social Security.
>
> A. Wants to make the minimum wage a ‘living wage’.
>
> A. Is a big believer in the separation of church and state.
>
> A. Opposed to any efforts to Privatize Social Security and
> instead supports
>
> increasing the amount of tax paid into Soc. Sec. Tax Increase.
>
> A. He voted NO on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax
> which now hits middle
>
> income brackets.
>
> A. He voted NO on repealing the ‘Death’ Tax. Tax Increase.
>
> A. He wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax. Tax Increase.
>
> A. Has repeatedly said the surge in Iraq has not
> succeeded…which is not true.
>
> A. He is ranked as the most liberal Senator in the Senate
> today, and that takes some
>
> doing.
>
>
> If your political choices are consistent with Barack Obama’s and you
> think that his positions will bring America together or make it a
> better place, then you will probably enjoy the ride and not forward
> this Email.
>
>
>
> If you are like most Americans that, after examining what he stands
> for, are truly not in line with his record, it would be prudent to get
> off the wave, or better yet, never get on, before it comes on shore
> and undermines the very foundations of this great Country.
>
>
>
> We have limited time to save America or the Supreme Court, as we know it to be.

Posted by: ****HATER****** | October 28, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

LYN:
SORRY BUT I AM HERE TO STAY AND I WILL POST WHAT I WANT.
THE CONSTITUTION STATES FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
SO GUESS WHAT, LYN??
YOU LOSE. :)

Posted by: *****HATER***** | October 28, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

YES, I’M A BAD AMERICAN
I Am the Liberal-Progressives Worst Nightmare. I am an American.I am a Master Mason and believe in God.I ride Harley Davidson Motorcycles and believe in American products. I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some Liberal governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!I’m in touch with my feelings and I like it that way!
I think owning a gun doesn’t make you a killer, it makes you a smart American. I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized, and does not entitle you to anything. Get over it! I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, do it in English.
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and Willie G Davidson that makes the Awesome Harley Davidson Motorcycles. I don’t hate the rich. I don’t pity the poor. I know wrestling is fake and I don’t waste my time watching or arguing about it.I’ve never owned a slave, or was a slave, I haven’t burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you! So, shut up already.I believe if you don’t like the way things are here, go back to where you came from and change your own country! This is AMERICA ….We like it the way it is! If you were born here and don’t like it you are free to move to any Socialist country that will have you.I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution. Can I get an AMEN on that one? I also think the cops have the right to pull you over if you’re breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.And, no, I don’t mind having my face shown on my drivers license. I think it’s good….. And I’m proud that ‘God’ is written on my money.I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don’t want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.I believe the president of the United States should put his hand over his heart and say the pledge of allegiance and should have no reservations about wearing American flag pins on his lapel. I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me into making ‘donations’ to their cause. Get a Job and do your part! I believe that it doesn’t take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.I believe ‘illegal’ is illegal no matter what the lawyers think.I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed in AMERICA !If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I’m a BAD American.
If you are a BAD American too, please forward this to everyone you know.We want our country back!
We NEED GOD BACK IN OUR COUNTRY!
WE LIVE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE,
ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE

Posted by: BAD AMERICAN | October 28, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

1. ABC
2. NBC
3. CBS
4. CNN
5. Acorn or overall corruption (take your pick)

Posted by: Shari | October 30, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I still worry about the voting machines that haven’t been changed from the 2000 election. They are still in 36 States. Let’s not forget the last administration
Why hasn’t anybody asked for this President and his administration for there impeachment?
1. Stole the 2000 election.
2. Responsible for the foreign policies, that led to the 9/11 attack.
3. Lied to the American people about the weapons of mass destruction.
4. Responsible for starting an illegal war.
5. Went after the wrong enemy responsible for 9/11 attack.
6. Didn’t abide by the Geneva and Hague Conventions.
7. Allowed the Al Qaeda break America financially.
Cleary they had a different agenda for Iraq. (A US present in an oil country).
8. Is a slave to the Oil & Financial Lobbyist?
9. Responsible, for 750,000+ jobs leaving America.
10. Responsible for the broken bank system.
11. Responsible for the broken housing market.
12. Responsible for the loss of the 401k investments.
13. Responsible for high fuel prices..
14. Responsible for the mass unemployment we’re experiencing.
15. Responsible for the failed medical system that only the elite can afford.
If we don’t punish the responsible parties to this disaster its going to happen again.
Tom the retired construction boss

Posted by: TJM | November 1, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

According to the book of Revelation, the anti-Christ: will be a man in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will come out of nowhere, decieve the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….. the prophesy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA? I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AND SEND THIS TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS WHO HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO VOTE. THE BOOK OF REVELATION SAYS THAT THE BEAST WILL BE ALLOWED TO HAVE AUTHORITY APPROX 42 months (in ch 13) Thats almost a 4 year presidency term. Lord have mercy on us!

Posted by: Chris | November 4, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

CHRIS:
I AGREE 100% WITH YOU THAT IS WHY I DIDNT VOTE AT ALL. IM 100% DEMOCRATIC, AND I WAS NOT VOTING FOR THE ANTICHRIST. LIKE ALL THESE NUCKLEHEADS DID AND SEE HE IS THE PRESIDENT NOW AND THE WORLD IS DEFINATELY GOING TO END NOW IN 2012. BOY, YOU OBAMA SUPPORTERS REALLY CUT EVERYBODIES LIVES SHORT. WE NOW ONLY HAVE 4 YEARS TO LIVE ON THIS EARTH. HOPE YOU ALL GOT WHAT YOU ALL WANTED THAT VOTED FOR HIM, BECAUSE I SURELY DIDNT.

Posted by: ******HATER***** | November 7, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

WHAT? DID JOHN MCCAIN LOSE?
I DO NOT BELIEVE HE DID!!! WE WILL REGRET THAT WE EVER VOTED THIS ‘UN INTO THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT!!!
HOW DOES THAT GET YOUR GOAT?
THOUGHT SO!!!

Posted by: Viktor | January 1, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.