By Lee Speigel

Oct 17, 2008 10:45pm

For Second Time, Palin Meets the Press

ABC News’ Imtiyaz Delawala reports: On a flight between Ohio and Indiana this afternoon, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin came back to the press section of her campaign plane and took questions for seven minutes — the second time she has done so in the past two weeks.

The Republican vice presidential nominee answered reporters’ questions on why she’s no longer raising Sen. Barack Obama’s connection to William Ayers on the campaign trial, whether she’s worried about the McCain campaign needing to defend traditionally Republican states, and her upcoming appearance tomorrow on "Saturday Night Live."

While two weeks ago, Palin was accusing Obama of "palling around with terrorists" and questioning his judgment and character, Palin said today that she does not question the Democratic presidential nominee’s love for America.

"I know Obama loves America. I’m sure that is why he’s running for president. It’s because he wants to do what he believes is in the best interest of this great nation. I believe that our ticket can do a better job for America," Palin said. "But I don’t question at all Barack Obama’s love for this great country."

Palin herself was blasted by Democratic vice presidential nominee Sen. Joe Biden today for saying at a fundraiser in North Carolina on Thursday that she enjoyed visiting "pro-America" areas of the country. Palin defended her comment, saying she did not mean to suggest that "any one area of America is more pro-America patriotically than others."

"Every area, every area across this great country where we’re stopping and where also the other ticket is stopping and getting to speak at these rallies and speak with the good Americans, it’s all pro-America," Palin said. "I was just reinforcing the fact that there, where I was, there’s good patriotic people there in these rallies, so excited about positive change and reform of government that’s coming that they are so appreciative of hearing our message, hearing our plan."

In recent days, Palin has noticeably toned down the rhetoric in her campaign speeches, no longer mentioning Obama’s association with former 60′s radical William Ayers. When asked why she is no longer mentioning the tie, Palin said that "the association is out there" and it’s now up to voters to decide whether it’s important.

"Well, I think that American voters are understanding that association — that it’s okay to talk about fact," Palin said. "It’s up now to the people of America to decide whether that association is important enough to them to research and find out more about a person’s judgment and truthfulness."

Palin said she has not asked Sen. McCain to raise Obama’s association with his controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, saying that it’s up to McCain whether he should raise the tie.

"It’s up to him you know and what he chooses to discuss," Palin said. "It is fair to the electorate to have the discussion — the debate about someone’s record and associations, but I haven’t advised Senator McCain on who he should bring up and what his topics of discussion should be."

With only 19 days to go until Election Day, the McCain-Palin ticket finds itself behind in most national and battleground state polls. And Palin has spent time in the last two days campaigning in North Carolina and Indiana — two states that are usually solidly Republican in national elections.

"I think it’s wise not to take anything for granted and assume that any state is a lock for either ticket, so if there were more hours in the day and more availabilities I would hope that we can be in even more states," Palin said when asked if she was concerned that the campaign is spending resources defending traditionally red states. "I don’t want to take anything for granted, and my input has been let us get out there to as many states as we have time for."

While Palin has now been on the national stage for six weeks since accepting the Republican vice presidential nomination, questions continue to be raised on whether she is qualified to serve as vice president, or as commander in chief if she were to become president. Palin defended her qualifications, saying her executive experience in Alaska has prepared her well for national office.

"If we’re so blessed to be elected president and vice president, that executive experience will be put to good use, as coming from a mayor and a manager, small business owner and a governor and a regulator of oil and gas," Palin said, citing qualifications she often raises on the campaign trail.

When not campaigning together, Palin says she talks to her running mate Sen. John McCain a few times a day, discussing the news of the day and plans for the campaign. While the two often campaigned together for large joint rallies in the first weeks after Palin’s nomination, they are now holding more solo events to cover more ground in the final days before Election Day.

"We really enjoy being able to campaign together and I wish we could do more of that together because we have I think some great synergy and really great chemistry and we get along so well, that not only is it very productive but its also fun to be able to campaign with him," Palin said.

Palin says she is excited about her appearance on "Saturday Night Live" tomorrow, saying it will give her an opportunity to show her having a sense of humor through the grind of campaigning. She does not yet know how she will be showcased on the show.

"I have no idea what to expect because I haven’t seen any scripts or anything else yet, but it will be fun," Palin said.

User Comments

McCain = DISHONORABLE; Palin = SCARY!!!

Posted by: Howard Gallas | October 17, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

maybe Palin will play a lost moose on SNL

Posted by: Gus | October 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Wow…can’t wait for SNL. So she’s getting praise for her second available interview in 3 months? Crazy…
http://demockracy.com/wedge-colored-glasses/

Posted by: Kevin | October 17, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Sarah Palin was hand picked to be the cute “pit bull in lipstick” for the McCain campaign. For those that understand the “Stepford Wife” allusion, we know she has been programmed to spew vile lies, false insuations, and say key words to associate McCain’s opponent in her words only to the vile she robotically repeats. It has been an insult to the majority of U.S. citizens’ ability to think critically and research the facts. She is NOT my research source. Hopefully, the majority will rise above the “Joe-Six-Pack-Plummer” references from a self-righteous separatist. I like to think we U.S. citizens are smarter than believing a party puppet.

Posted by: Terresa | October 17, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Sarah Palin will need the money to help take care of her unwed daughter,
She does not want a Palin grandchild on Public Welfare in Alaska.

Posted by: Lucky Lucy | October 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Palin…and her false INSINUATIONS…

Posted by: Terresa | October 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

She finally had the decency to say something nice. Maybe if she spent more time getting out a positive message with real ideas at her “pro-America” rallies, then she wouldn’t be so lambasted.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Seven minutes to convince anyone listening she is not a lost cause.
Times up. She’s a lost cause.

Posted by: doug | October 17, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

What happened to my comments about Palin’s “Stepford Wife,” programmed statements? Palin is an insult to the citizens of this GREAT nation. I pray that voters are wise enough to rise above Palin’s lies.

Posted by: Terresa | October 17, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Can’t help thinking it wasn’t her decency speaking, but instructions from McCain. Buried behind the mean-spirited attacks and disguised by his grouchiness and temper, there is still some decency. Palin’s ‘decency’ seems to be reserved for those that she regards as being her sort of people. Democrats and moderates on the other hand are fair game.

Posted by: Klippa | October 17, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

VOTE EARLY! THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION OF OUR LIFE TIME!

Posted by: Terresa | October 17, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

How come no one in the press mentions Palin’s own minister, Thomas Muthee, the one who exorcised Palin’s “witches” and who has an anti-Semitic agenda? There’s all kinds of reliable sources out there, even a vid of this jerk spouting his hate while Palin sat in the audience, but the mainstream media doesn’t mention it. Nor did the press say a word when Palin quoted Westbrook Pegler, an openly vicious racist and anti-Semitic writer, at her RNC speech. This is who Sarah Palin is: a right-wing religious fundamentalist who admires racists and anti-Semites, who wants to shove her religious beliefs down the throats and into the uteruses of every American. So, how come you guys fawn all over her in the thirty seconds the McCain campaign lets her give you every few weeks?
Ditto for Palin and her husband’s involvement in the rabidly anti-American Alaska Independence Party. Why isn’t the press all over her, instead of giving her talking points on the stupid recycled Ayers and Wright stories? The AIP have said things that make the youthful Ayers sound like a Sunday school teacher. How about letting the public know?
How come no one in the “liberal media” asks McCain about his continuing relationship with Gordon Liddy?
How come all the press is talking about ACORN, when they have to admit ACORN hasn’t done anything wrong, while meanwhile, all over the country, the GOP is using all the cheap tricks in the book to get voters whom they fear disenfranchised, like they did for the past two elections? They’re pros at cheating, but no one gives them a hard time.
Now I see reporters are getting attacked at Palin rallies for not being reverent enough. Serves you guys right. Maybe you’ll do some real reporting.
Not holding my breath, though.

Posted by: SFSister | October 17, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Sarah Palin is our nation’s last hope! So Vote for McCain and Palin.

Posted by: Eric | October 17, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

It is obvious from the idiotic posts by Senator Obama’s supporters that Governor Palin has shaken Obama’s campaign, in spite of the press having taken every opportunity to try to discredit her.
McCain/Palin ’08

Posted by: LJ | October 17, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Michele Bachmann. Told Matthews today on Hardball that Obama is anti-American and congress should be investigated to root out liberals.
She will be joining Palin on the campaign trail soon.

Posted by: WorseThanPalin | October 17, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Great, now I’m gonna miss another night of SNL. Thanks Sarah! I can’t really see her doing comedy or there being any motivation to bother setting my tivo. We already know enough about her…It’s bad enough thinking about McCain’s short temper and poor judgement in running the country but to think of Palin’s lack of knowledge or much of anything else. She’s kind of like an empty box. Not much to it or in it…empty space between the ears. It’s too bad McCain couldn’t have found a better pick for this. I mean this isn’t a beauty contest. He’s too old and she’s just too much of an airhead.

Posted by: momof2 | October 17, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Vote Obama for your children!!

Posted by: mitch | October 17, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Shes perfect for SNL considering her nomination is a joke.

Posted by: Bobba | October 17, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

“If we’re so blessed to be elected president and vice president, that executive experience will be put to good use, as coming from a mayor and a manager, small business owner and a governor and a regulator of oil and gas,”
This woman is a wayyyyy over her head, a rambling talk-point machine. She cannot string a sentence together that vaguely resembles the intelligence necessary for this job. Country first, McCain? I think NOT!

Posted by: Anna | October 17, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

I’m with Eric. The left-wing liberals and the media have been HORRIBLE with their disrespect for Sarah Palin- who is running for Vice President and has more experience than “The One.”
If SNL doesn’t railroad Sarah on the show- her sincerity and genuine love FOR her country and pride FOR her country -will shine through.
What a better place for Sarah to “get through” to the young people whose frame of reference doesn’t KNOW a lot of history- and shamefully- the American educational system – has failed to teach them.
McCain-Palin 2008
P.S. Please don’t through your vote away by “writing in” Hillary, Huckabee, Romney, Paul or Barr- to make a “statement”
It will just weaken the statement that we God fearing, Country LOVING people have to make.
I can’t bear to think of a first lady who feels that “America is a downright mean country.”
The liberal left are mean, angry, disrepectful- SCARY people.

Posted by: Alec | October 17, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

SARAH PALIN = LAUGHINGSTOCK
McCAIN = FAIL

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 17, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Vote Obama for your children!!
Maybe Osama bin Laden’s children.

Posted by: seinfeld | October 17, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

The agenda of the Media is to destroy Palin. They will twist any interview against her anyway.

Posted by: mikewolf9 | October 17, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Alec, The liberal left are mean and scary? have you BEEN to a McCain Palin hate Rally? From what Ive seen of them and heard from McCains ads, and heard from right wing bloggers you guys are the meanest hateful people on the earth. Its interesting that you dont hear liberals calling for anyone to be killed, or beheaded. The right wing have always been this way. The liberals are generally peaceful people who want only truth and fairness, and if they dont get it they might complain, but they dont often call for the death of anyone. We dont even like the death penalty for crying out loud. You guys are the scary ones!

Posted by: Jo | October 17, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Palin is so unethical. I wonder whhich skit she will do — AIP skit or Troopergate.

Posted by: Lucky Lucy | October 17, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

McCain’s Ayers- Hiding G. Gordan Liddy Connection:….
Take a good look at the PEOPLE that John McCain “associates” with.
John McCain was on the David Letterman show on Thursday and the quote most people have watched is where McCain says “I screwed up”. His body language is that of Oops! But further on into the show McCain then said this. “I’m not in any way embarassed to know GORDAN LIDDY.”
READ ON: Nixon impeached- America’s Honorable Republicans……
Others included plotting to murder journalist Jack Anderson; plotting with a “gangland figure” to murder Howard Hunt to stop him from cooperating with investigators; plotting to firebomb the Brookings Institution; and plotting to kidnap “leftist guerillas” at the 1972 Republican National Convention, kidnapping anti-war activists and transporting them to Mexico and arranging call girls to catch Democrats in compromising situations.
Liddy is most famous for the break in at the Watergate Hotel. Basically, the “plumbers” were caught breaking into the Democratic National Committee Headquarters housed at the Watergate hotel. Their intention was to bug the phones and put in a “room monitoring device”.
Liddy was sentenced to over 21 years in prison. He served four and a half years in prison after being convicted of conspiracy, burglary and illegal wiretapping. Liddy’s sentence was commuted by President Carter.

Posted by: sue | October 17, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Choose peace and love, choose Obama 08!

Posted by: Fairfax | October 17, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Sarah Palin is not newsworthy….
Anyone who is found to break an ethics law, then lie about it, is not worth a vote.
She said in NC yesterday, that only small town americans are Pro America… so since I live in a big city, that means I am UnAmerican?
She says she runs a transparent government, then charges the AP 15 million dollars to get copies of all the emails her staff and her sent to her husband?
Why the media does not ask about this is beyond me…
I guess its because the McCain/Palin campaign has 2 coward cards they play.
1.you talk about Palin and they play the sexism card.
2. you talk about McCains terrorist/radical associations and he uses the “I will sue you ” card.
So the media cowers to McCain and never reports the stories to the public, but they will beat the same horse to death on Ayers, Wright and Acorn.
Guess the MSM hasn’t grown a pair yet and do the right thing and report all stories, no matter what.
But they report this garbage, about Palin talking to the reporters on her plane, and yet not one reporter had the nerve to ask a serious question?
I have lost any use for the MSM, they just have no clue on how to report anymore.

Posted by: lmg | October 17, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

There are some on here who have missed the new McCain talking points and message that it’s time to be nice. Don’t worry though, if you don’t like it the odds are the message will be different tomorrow anyway.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

G.Gordon Liddy never bombed anyone. Obama’s friend did.

Posted by: mikewolf9 | October 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Miewolf9, No he only encouraged people to shoot ATF agents in the head.

Posted by: SemperFi | October 17, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

“More than 25,000 Hoosiers welcome veep hopeful Sarah Palin to Noblesville-” Terre Haute News
Amazing how Gov. Palin continues to draw record crowds wherever she goes-and w/o a rock band as a come-on.
Imagine-all those misguided people.-:)
Thanks for the forum.
Vin at http://www.wegotsarah.com

Posted by: vinprose | October 17, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

I guess the Obama-maniacs are just mean, wicked hateful, disrespectful people.
My next guess is that they were in Rev. G.D. AmeriKKKa Wright- whose hate America, hate whites, Black theology- BO and MO and their KIDS listened to.
The media died in this election cycle.
Shame on you- Chris Mathews, Keith Obermann, Maureen Dowd, Katie Couric- ABC, NBC, ABC, CNN and MSNBC and then all the print media (too long to list) have absolutely IGNORED all of Obama’s mentors, associates, business dealings, doing coke- CHRIST!
He isn’t qualified to be a United States postman delivering mail- nevermind the President of this great nation.
McCain-Palin 2008

Posted by: Marion | October 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Sarah Palin connects with MOST Americans because she is down to earth and doesn’t spout the same rhetoric like Barack Obama.She has led reform in Alaska, and given money back to the tax payers, so why wouldn’t every citizen be rooting for a chance for REAL CHANGE, instead of trusting Obama, who has a record of raising taxe 94 times?If he got elected, that magic $250,000 salary could magically drop to $100,000 so he can pay for his GLOBAL POVERTY ACT(read about it on IBD editorials.com(Obama’s Global Tax)!Keep speaking for America, Sarah.We need common sense in Washington instead of the rhetoric of a lawyer!

Posted by: KIm | October 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I think what makes people so angry is that Obama seems to be covered by the same magic teflon that coated Bill Clinton in 1992. Nothing sticks, whether relevant or not.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I have to disagree with Alec in his defense of Palin.
He is concerned that young people don’t know a lot of history and that the education system has failed to teach them.
Unfortunately it is Palin who has shown in the few interviews that she has done that she is ignorant at least of recent world history and of much national history. And from her unscripted statements she is proud of this ignorance. Furthermore it is her school system and those like it that has led to the poor knowledge among young people. In her time as mayor and governor she has been more concerned about ensuring equal time for creationism alongside science and about working out what books she can ban from libraries.

Posted by: Klippa | October 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

And lets get the record straight Ayers was against killing anyone. He targetted government interests, not people. He never bombed anyone either.

Posted by: SemperFi | October 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

MIGuy, What makes good people so mad is the negative attacks and low life tactics of McCain and Palin, as evidenced by the polls.

Posted by: JJ | October 17, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

It is obvious from the idiotic posts by Senator Obama’s supporters that Governor Palin has shaken Obama’s campaign
===============================
Well we are shaken by the fact that 38% of Americans STILL consider her a credible candidate.
That’s not personal. But even McCain, when asked, wouldn’t say she was qualified. He only said, “I’m really proud of her”. That’s what one says about their daughter after the high school play, not your VICE PRESIDENTIAL running mate.
You’d think he’d of said ‘hell yes’ if he belived it. Especially because he knows most of America doesn’t.
We’ve seen Bush get into the White House twice via the GOP’s psuedo patriotic flag waving BS. We ARE scared that the collective intelligence of this nation may have gone down the toilet. And that some in our nation will be fooled into voting the Britney Spears of national politics into power.
Hopefully, the majority of Americans have some sense of critical thinking left.

Posted by: Hell Yah, I'm Sacred | October 17, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

It is true that Palin’s rhetoric and Obama’s are quite different and at times equally meaningless. The difference is that Palin uses her talent to insult, deride and divide while Obama provides more “hope”. So while both “connect” with Americans, Palin connects in a demonstrably and deliberately polarizing fashion.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Posted by: Sarah | October 17, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

“I know Obama loves America. I’m sure that is why he’s running for president. It’s because he wants to do what he believes is in the best interest of this great nation. I believe that our ticket can do a better job for America,” Palin said. “But I don’t question at all Barack Obama’s love for this great country.”
Sarah Palin, is this what lies behind your McCarthyist speeches? Can you now rein in Michele Bachmann who shares your ability to make hate speeches with a smile?

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 17, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

JJ: The tactics are not new. That they are so obvious, and so obviously bad at it, is new.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Undisputable FACT: Obama was, and is, friends with a known and nonrepetant terrorist. The fact that he continues to lie about it is sheer proof at how dangerous this association is.
I found it HIGH-larious that the Obama-ites continue to question Palin’s experience, yet they completely have no defense at the scary thought of the razor thin resume of Obama, and the complete lack of experience he brings to the table. To claim Palin, who is running for vice president, is inexperienced when Obama is ridiculously unprepared for the job, is utterly laughable.
God bless President McCain, who will save America, yet again, this time from the threat of Obama.

Posted by: liberati | October 17, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

I think Sarah was concerned that Joe the plumber had done more interviews in 12 hours than she has done as a VP candidate.
Obviously, McCain and Co are realizing they need to play good cop bad cop.
They’ll put out a load of unsubstatiated accusations, and the say Barack’s a great guy with a smile.

Posted by: Don't Buy the Hype | October 17, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

what a complete joke as mccains first and most important executive decision… “pro-america”?… what a divisive comment… no wonder america is rejecting her and mccain in what will prove to be a landslide election for a new powerful leader and direction for our great country

Posted by: earthisnotflat | October 17, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Jo,
For your information- I HAVE been to a Sarah Palin rally- at The Villages in Florida.
And if YOU read- the Secret Service has reported that there were no shouts of “Kill HIM” or “TERRORIST” at the rallies.
Do YOUR homework.
And if you don’t believe me- I’ll send you the links to the reports from the feds.
Something REALLY scary- is the Barack Obama call to the lady in Lufkin TX that ended up with a citizen having the Secret Service show up on her porch.
Now- That’s SCARY.
First the lady in Lufkin, then the attacks on Joe the Plumber and later- the Fairness Doctrine.
Be very afraid.
We’ll be a socialist/communist country shortly.
God help us.

Posted by: Alec | October 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

You don’t find it unusual that PTA experience is continually brought up as one of Palin’s crucial pieces of experience?
You might not like Obama, or that he was a community organizer, but can’t you admit that he’s run one heck of a campaign? I know, now comes the ‘he’s stealing the election – ACORN – the fabric of America is being destroyed’. Honestly, that’s just being a sore loser. This is politics. Even Al Gore figured that out eventually.

Posted by: MIguy | October 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Liberati, Rush Limbaugh, is that you?

Posted by: JJ | October 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

The press continues to report on Obama’s “questionable acquaintance” with Ayers and Wright. What I don’t understand is why there is no reports about Todd Palin’s association with membership in the Alasak Indepence Party. This is a group that has ties to hostile foreign government (Iran) and has members who do not consider themselves American.
Todd Palin is a former member and Sarah, has spoken at their conventions on their behalf many times. Why is no one raising this fact in the media? Were Sarah Palin to become VP the issue would have to be dealt with. Could the Palin’s be given security clearance under these circumstances? This is an organization that wants to secede from the United States. Anyone who is a member of this party and their associates(Sarah) deserves to brought to the attention of the American people.
The press continues to report on Obama’s “questionable acquaintance” with Ayers and Wright. What I don’t understand is why there is no reports about Todd Palin’s association with membership in the Alasak Indepence Party. This is a group that has ties to hostile foreign government (Iran) and has members who do not consider themselves American.
Todd Palin is a former member and Sarah, has spoken at their conventions on their behalf many times. Why is no one raising this fact in the media? Were Sarah Palin to become VP the issue would have to be dealt with. Could the Palin’s be given security clearance under these circumstances? This is an organization that wants to secede from the United States. Anyone who is a member of this party and their associates(Sarah) deserves to brought to the attention of the American people.
If Obama’s ties to Ayers can be repeated over and over in the press why isn’t Sarah Palin’s assocations being given equal time?
I demand equal time for Sarah Palin’s associates to be discussed in the press too.
If Obama’s ties to Ayers can be repeated over and over in the press why isn’t Sarah Palin’s assocations being given equal time?
I demand equal time for Sarah Palin’s associates to be discussed in the press too.

Posted by: Marlene | October 17, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

The GOP is still nasty as ever with their phone calls and the MSNBC interview with GOP Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann flat out said liberals were leftist anti-Americans and Congress should be investigated for more anti-Americans! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27243547#27243547
BTW, check out the real story of Palin and her infamous pipeline, from her own senior oil and gas policy advisor, who refuses to endorse her: http://www.alaskadispatch.com/tundra-talk/1-talk-of-the-tundra/227-governor-palins-performance-doesnt-match-her-rhetoric.html

Posted by: joesmom | October 18, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Alec, Relax, the commies arent coming to get you ok? Take your prozac now and go lie down. You nationalists sure get fired up. Yes they did yell kill him at least one time, Im not saying they didnt tone down their rhetoric after they realized they could be arrested for that, but that doesnt mean they dont still mean it. And Im not saying they said it about Obama, they probably said it about Ayers, but still its a crowd of riled up people yelling about killing someone and it doesnt make it ok because it was about Ayers or anyone else, its still about killing.

Posted by: Jo | October 18, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

The right wing crowds at these rallys remind you of the crowds at public executions in the old days. Liberals dont behave that way.

Posted by: Fairfax | October 18, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

WOW..HATE IS OOZING OUT OF YOUR MOOSE MOUTH SARAH FAILIN PALIN. YOU WANT TO SHOW YOUR SENSE OF HUMOR? HAH. HAH. HAH. YOU SHOULD HAVE A SENSE OF CIVILITY AND HONESTY, BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, A SENSE OF MOTHERHOOD. HOW’S YOUR PREGNANT TEENAGER DOING? WHEN IS GOING TO HAVE HER BABY? I WISH HER WELL.

Posted by: khatts98178 | October 18, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Jo,
No one can control what anyone says at a rally.
(Hell -Barack can’t even control what Joe Biden the “walking gaffe machine-human gasbag” says.)
Bothers me a great deal when people say there will be violence- especially when spread by inuendo by the Dems. James Carville is one.
The media is horrible- but the blogs are “downright dispicable.”

Posted by: Alec | October 18, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

why are all your republicans so mean and bitter?

Posted by: earthisnotflat | October 18, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I can’t wait for the silent majority to finally have their say at the polls, and to see the looks on the Obama supporters faces when McCain wins Nov. 4, and to see the media, which has tried to influence this election from day one, have to swallow another defeat. These blogs are filled with Obama hype because McCain supporters choose not to blabber-mouth and be so in-your-face obnoxious. We’ll just take care of business at the polls.

Posted by: Dean | October 18, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Yeah- according to Barack Obama- us Pennsylvanians are “bitter Americans-clinging to our guns and religion,” while speaking to a left-wing findraiser in San Francisco.
We are hard working Americans who don’t want Socialist and an ENLARGED welfare state?

Posted by: Nitro | October 18, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

If I was at a rally that was representative of my candidate and someone in that rally yelled something like “kill him” and I saw who said it I would turn him in and have him removed. If I didnt do that I would know that everyone would associate me with what was said. Allowing that sort of thing to go on around you is as bad as doing it yourself. That is TRUE guilt by association. If we dont start acting civil people things could get real ugly real fast, someone has to stand up and say enough, and its gotta be you regular Joes out there. Theres a right and a wrong and things allowed to go too wrong can sometimes not be turned back. Dont allow hate to exist among you or it will consume you.

Posted by: Jo | October 18, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

really fairfax….”All illegal immigrants will be required to register with the US government or be sent back.”…Hummm would it surprise you to know that statement was made by your Dem Nancy Pelosi today???? Gee sounds like fascist state to me

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

It isn’t just Obama supporters who are shaken by Palin.
Independents like me and even many Republicans who hold the old-fashioned view that a candidates should be qualified for the positions that they seek are horrified by Palin’s presence on the GOP ticket.
Gov. Palin simply lacks the qualifications — experience, education, and brains — to be vice president, particularly when Sen. McCain is over 70 and has a history of cancer.
I would have voted for John McCain if he were the John McCain of 2000. But I knew I couldn’t vote for him after his reckless and irresponsible choice of Sen. Palin as his running mate.

Posted by: Leah | October 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

– According to Barack Obama- us Pennsylvanians are “bitter Americans-clinging to our guns and religion,” –
Not exactly what he said…
He said: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And it’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
And having lived there, he is spot on regarding how many feel.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

jo…Gotta love a lib…jump on every rumor that sounds to good to pass up..sorry to disappoint but that statement has already been disproved by the Secret Service…

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

To require that illegal activity be reigned in sounds like enforcement of the law to me.

Posted by: Fairfax | October 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

lol concernedamerican…really don’t see the difference in the statement nitro made vs. the statement obama made…

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

it is sad that the media won’t demand palin answer real questions.

Posted by: william | October 18, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

soalvoter, Gotta love a con, they hate too much and their hearts are hard. Statistically liberals are more loving, caring, and intelligent. Most cons are uneducated, hateful, spiteful, loners. All they care about are themselves.

Posted by: Jo | October 18, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

fairfax Unless of course that same statement had been made by a repub chances are you would have been the first to cry racism or unfeeling or mean spirited or my personal favorite, intolerance…geez the dems have controlled the house and senate since 2006 but yet the kenndey and mccain immigration reform bill was never passed now all of a sudden the Dems find religion and want to round up the illegals…WHO IS NEXT..Again…sounds like fascist state to me….

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

If the Leftists are so sure Obama’s going to win, then why the rancor over Sarah Palin, the insults and the smears?
How can someone who’s ‘obviously’ on a losing ticket be so ‘dangerous’?

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 18, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Acutally, ‘concerned’ posted the condensed version.. here is the full one:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration and the Bush administration and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not, And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations”.
Maybe he could of worded it better, but he was expressing his understanding and concern for them, how previous administrations had failed them, and his determination to make their lives better by trying to return jobs to their communities. I’ve never heard McCain say anything even close to expressing his understanding of the situation except for grand general comments and him saying he knows how to get the job done (without explaining exactly how).

Posted by: sammy | October 18, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

gee jo where in my statement did I say I was supporting mccain/palin…again you are proving my point..lash on the unproven info to promote your lopsided comment…You really do not sound very compassionate to me rather insulting and rude…BTW I have two degrees..one of which I use to teach…

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

– If the Leftists are so sure Obama’s going to win, then why the rancor over Sarah Palin, the insults and the smears? –
Because it showcases how low some Americans expectations have become regarding our elected leaders, and how a party can scrape the bottom of the barrel and still have people bend over and take it, and ask for even more by cheering and defending them on.
Perhaps Bush has desensitized people to what ignorance in leadership does and caused people to forget that in the past this was a nation who promoted the best and brightest for a good reason. Perhaps it is that some people simply vote their party regardless of issues, and perhaps it is just our long history of intolerance and fear rearing it’s ugly head once again.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Posted by: socalvoter | Oct 18, 2008 12:28:30 AM
You can’t see the difference?
Obama said some voters in Pennsylvania, who are frustrated by lost jobs (owing to Republican economic policies) are bitter about this – their lost jobs, that is.
However, instead of recognizing that it is Republican economic policies that have cost them their standard of living, they seek out some other explanation (immigrants or foreign trade).
Rather than directing their justified anger at the Republican party, they focus their frustration, frustration that has its source in their lost jobs, by defending prized cultural values, i.e. the right to own guns, against perceived threats.
Obama did say these voters in Pennsylvania are indeed bitter, BITTER ABOUT THEIR LOST JOBS.
He went on to argue their justified anger at lost employment is manipulated and misdirected by the Republican party.
What Obama has been attempting to do during this election is encourage such voters to finally vote their economic interests rather than letting themselves be manipulated and distracted by the “culture wars”.
Judging by the polls in Pennsylvania, Obama has been having some success with these arguments.
:-)

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

As I see it now, Obama is changing from his black liberation theology, and he is more into white liberation theology.

Posted by: Joe | October 18, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

It seems to me the Palin haters are disaffected by Real Women clinging to their Babies and Bibles. Get a life!!

Posted by: john | October 18, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Just in case you’re new here – someone here (posing as several) has about 20 browsers opened up on his old IBM tower PC and is posting all of this anti-Obama stuff on every single political blog here, CNN and MSNBC. Oh ya, and even Alaska Daily News. Its the same person – after you’ve been here for a while you will just IGNORE like the rest of us. You can spot him a mile a way by his screen names (usually female or ‘independent something’ or ‘former dem’ or a european name). The same cut & paste blah blah as well as spelling and grammar patterns – so obvious.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Obama’s comments about voters in Pennsylvania in a nutshell:
Over the past 25 years, folks in Pennsylvania have suffered from steady, uninterrupted job loss.
No jobs have replaced these lost jobs.
The Republican party has done nothing to help these people.
So, voters in Pennsylvania are understandably bitter about this.
Unfortunately, rather than voting their economic interests, they’ve been manipulated by Republican propaganda to waste their energies and votes on the “culture wars”.
Obama is asking voters to forget the culture wars and vote their economic interests instead.
If they vote their economic interests, they will vote for the Democratic party. :-)

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I also believe that you need to look toward the Democratic party, for examples of “intolerant behavior” as it has not been exclusively limited to the Republicans. This election has created mis-trust among the Republicans,because of one sided representation of the media and others that it will be nearly impossible for obama to be excepted by them..Being labeled a racist or intolerant or unfeeling simply because of different belief in policy has been grossly unfair…Repubs will feel toward obama as Dems have felt against Bush…That is what this election has created…Change..NOT REALLY..

Posted by: socalvoter | October 18, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Posted by: socalvoter | Oct 18, 2008 1:04:21 AM
“I also believe that you need to look toward the Democratic party, for examples of “intolerant behavior”
—-
I beg to differ.
Neither Obama or Biden have been stirring up the mob and inciting violence (like Palin has been).
Neither Obama or Biden have been running “robo-calls” hinting that Obama is some sort of terrorist.
Neither Obama or Biden have been running smear campaigns against McCain or Palin anything like the smears that Republican proxies have been running against Obama.
—-

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Obama/Biden are for the people period !!!
They have well laid out plan for the American people.
They haven’t waviered or swayed from that plan for us.
McCain/Palin can’t even get their facts straight. Half the time the aren’t even on the same page. They spend their time spewing lies, attacks, and now this underhanded robocalling.
No way, no how can I give a vote to a man that is hooked to Bush’s hip….
Obama/Biden they got it going on !!!!!

Posted by: lawwal | October 18, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

– Neither Obama or Biden have been running smear campaigns against McCain or Palin –
In addition, if you look at the target of those ads, Obama attacks policies and positions on issues facing Americans and draws comparisons between his position and McCains on them, the GOP is in an all out ad homenium against Obama himself. I’m in a swing state that both parties are dumping a lot of cash into.. I get bombarded by both and the difference is quite stark. I have not yet seen a McCain ad that actually addressed issues, simply more of the same fear and ignorance tactics to get people to question the man, not his platform. That is exactly why even former supporters and members in the GOP are starting to distance themselves from McCain, such as Florida governor Crist who helped McCain win the primaries.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Way to go Palin. You don’t have to mention Obama’s past. We already knew about his fakeness and hideousity.

Posted by: young_voter | October 18, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

– Way to go Palin. You don’t have to mention Obama’s past. We already knew about his fakeness and hideousity –
See! Couldn’t ask for a more perfect example..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Despicable, dishonest, uninformed and unintelligent. Great adjectives to describe Palin and great adjectives to describe the next possible Commander in Chief should Gramps McCain go down …
Caribou Barbie has the unimitigated gall to trot out her son’s service in Iraq as a comeback to some well deserved heckling at her rallies. What does our Iraqi occupation and deposition of Saddam Hussein have to do with our freedom of speech, anyway?

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 18, 2008 1:17:34 AM

McCain has been running a strange campaign, indeed.
1. He does a poor job of outlining his own plans for the country – the most we know is that he is a “Maverick”, who will somehow do things differently once elected.
2. He has focused ALL of his energies on smearing Obama personally. Yet, the supposed “facts” informing these attacks don’t hold up under a second’s scrutiny. McCain continues to wage the same attacks long after everyone else has moved on.
The only area I see the Republican party (and John McCain) getting any traction is in their persistent misrepresentation of what ACORN has been doing.
Should Obama win on Nov. 4th, I think many partisan Republicans will be convinced Obama stole the election.
I fear McCain and the Republicans may yet succeed in undermining Obama’s legitimacy (should he win, of course).

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

I think everyone will be scared once they put Obama in the White House. I really don’t see how a far left wing socialist is going to make our economy better? Have you listened to the fact that he’s going to raise your taxes and promises to give health insurance that we don’t have a budget for. Where is he going to get that money? He’s either A. going to increase the deficit or B he’s going to tax you more. And who exactly is going to get all this money he’s going to redistribute? My guess is people already on welfare that are tax dollars are paying to sit on their butt.
The media would love for everyone to believe Sarah Palin is an idiot, but she’s far from it. She may have stumbled on some questions, but look at her record. She cut property tax in Alaska, and even cut her own salary as Mayor 10% to help give money back to the tax payers. Obama has voted to increase taxes basically his entire career. Why anyone would even consider Obama is beyond me. I’ve already voted, but maybe I should head up to Ohio. I hear you can get a few more votes in up there and you don’t even have to be from the state, heck even the country.

Posted by: Peter | October 18, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

the only change i have witnessed during this election cycle is a pronounced divisiveness such as i have never seen before that will have lasting effects. the outright hatred expressed toward anybody that does not support obama is shocking.
i miss the civilized demeanor, class, tone, and respect toward the opponent that hillary would have brought to this election. all i have seen in obama/biden and his supporters is a bunch of crazed thugs.

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

– Have you listened to the fact that he’s going to raise your taxes and promises to give health insurance that we don’t have a budget for. –
You are indeed one uninformed voter.
First off, taxes are needed to pay for government spending. Obama will modestly raise taxes for those families earning over $250, and will reduce taxes more for the middle class than McCain would (under McCains plan, you need to earn $100K or more to see a tax cut).
And nobody is giving insurance away for free. Both McCain and Obamas health plans will cost roughly the same, but Obama would allow more americans to obtain insurance and be more efficent in doing so. McCains health plan, just like his tax plan favors the wealthy, and would result in more americans losing insurance.
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126
Please do some research before you go repeating the same uninformed lies.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

In case anyone is forgetting, it is Bush that is being the socialist here lately.
Anyway, back to Palin. Here’s an interesting quote from the Salt Lake Tribune endorsement of Obama (which echoes a lot of the other newspaper editorial board sentiment recently):
“More than any single factor, McCain’s bad judgment in choosing the inarticulate, insular and ethically challenged Palin disqualifies him for the presidency.”
Why can’t McCain just say he “screwed up” and move on…

Posted by: MIguy | October 18, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

This election is no more divisive than the previous five and, in many ways, less so…

Posted by: MIguy | October 18, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

– i miss the civilized demeanor, class, tone, and respect toward the opponent that hillary would have brought to this election. –
In case you missed it, it was Hillary who started most of the mudslinging and character assassination attacks that the GOP picked up and have continued against Obama.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

jo i guess you have not kept up with information REGARDING the alledged comment ‘kill him’ at a palin rally which was PROVED FALSE AS PER A REPORT BY THE SECRET SERVICE WHO WERE PRESENT REPORT WENT OUT TODAY. so instead of posting lies and rumors do some research.
goodnight

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

I’m not uninformed, and I’m well aware taxes are needed for government spending, no one said we were going to be tax free. When taxes increase so does everything else, and that will not produce more jobs.

Posted by: Peter | October 18, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

http://www.236.com/feed/2008/10/08/palin_and_the_successionists_9421.php
why isn’t this talked about more and why isn’t she asked questions about her involvement with the AIP???????????

Posted by: MERLE7 | October 18, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

– When taxes increase so does everything else, and that will not produce more jobs. –
Yeah, we were really hurting under Clinton.
Why do you suppose former fed chairman Volker, perhaps the last great economic genius supports Obamas and his tax policy, along with a host of Nobel prize winners in economics, and Greenspan has come out and said he does not support McCains tax cuts? There is a name for people who think doing the same thing over and over again will somehow result in a different outcome, and it’s not flattering. Hover tried it, Regan tried it, Bush Sr. tried it and Bush Jr. tried it. In all cases, trickle down taxation failed even though it looks so good on paper.
The rest of your original rant was also misinformed, such as the ’10%’ tax cut that the next year was reversed with a salary increase to above where she was before her ‘cut’.
http://washingtonindependent.com/6584/as-mayor-palin-took-a-pay-cutand-then-a-hike
It is uninformed voters that got us Bush.. fortunately, the more intelligent are finally getting involved and see right through the hype.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108043/Candidate-Support-Education.aspx

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

“I’m not uninformed, and I’m well aware taxes are needed for government spending, no one said we were going to be tax free. When taxes increase so does everything else, and that will not produce more jobs.”
When taxes increase a bit more for those who are making more, and do not increase for the vast majority of those who are making less, that vast majority can then put more money back in the economy that they would otherwise be paying in taxes.
So yes, it does produce jobs because it creates more a demand for products due to increased spending, which in turn creates jobs..and in the end puts more money BACK into the hands of the wealthy who employed the middle or lower middle class.

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Posted by: Peter | Oct 18, 2008 1:28:37 AM
Peter, Peter…
Its a free country, and you’re of course free to write anything you want. That doesn’t make anything you write is even remotely true, though. :-)
1. People who vote FOR Obama won’t be scared, though I’m sure people who vote against Obama will be…and they should be…they’ve been convinced by Palin that Obama is “not one of us”, a “closet terrorist”, and they ve been convince by Fox News that Obama is a socialist and “secret Muslim”.
He is none of these, but the people who believe this cannot be moved by the truth.
They believe what they want to. The Obama they are afraid of is an imaginary boogie-man who does not in fact exist. But that doesn’t stop them from quaking under their beds.
2. Obama is NOT a left-wing socialist (see friendship with Sen. D*ck Lugar)
3. He is NOT going to raise our taxes. He is going to RESTORE taxes to the rates in effect under President Ronald Reagan, the original tax-cutter .
If these tax rates were good enough for Reagan, they’re good enough for me, and should be good enough for any American patriot:-)
Are you saying Ronald Reagan was a left-wing socialist?
4. Obama will not “redistribute” any money. Where did you get this idea? He is cutting taxes for 95% of the American population, is this what you mean by “redistribution”? I thought Republicans LOVED to cut taxes? :-)
5. Sarah Palin RAISED taxes as Mayor of Wasilla.
6. As Governor, Sarah Palin RAISED taxes from around 10% to 20% on oil revenues. She REDISTRIBUTED the increased tax revenues to the citizens of Alaska – EXACTLY LIKE A SOCIALIST.
In a word, Sarah Palin actually carried out socialist redistribution policies when she raised taxes on oil companies and redistributed this government tax income to Alaska’s citizens (the $1000 she paid to each Alaskan man, woman, and child last year)!

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Vote Obama for your children!!
Posted by: mitch | Oct 17, 2008 11:26:46 PM
====
He will take ‘em to be educated by Wright. 0bama turned out ok, wright, under Wriight..

Posted by: fasd | October 18, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Concerned American since when is telling the truth considered a smear. as i remember she brought up rev. wright and obmas 20 year association with him that is not a smear that is the truth. as is ayers and too many other shady thugs to mention for the purposes of this post.

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Posted by: nevada 2 | Oct 18, 2008 1:31:12 AM
“…the outright hatred expressed toward anybody that does not support obama is shocking…”

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Palin says she gets depressed when she reads news !
I get depressed when I read news about Palin !
She’s ….DESPICABLE……and ………DEPPRESING !!!!!!!

Posted by: skyglider2008 | October 18, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

– Concerned American since when is telling the truth considered a smear. as i remember she brought up rev. wright and obmas 20 year association with him that is not a smear that is the truth. –
It is an attack on his character, not his platform. Call it what you like, but for most, it is known as a guilt-by-association fallacy. That was the point, the focus of McCains ads are strictly against the man, not the platform, while the reverse is true with Obama ads. There are plenty of guilt-by-association fallacies that could be brought up against McCain, such his involvement in the largest S&L meltdown in our history, his involvement in the Iran-contra scandal, his legislation and support, both in congress and covertly while sitting on the advisory board of the US Council for World Freedom providing funding and arms for the Kosovo Liberation Army. And the list goes on.
If you are unable or unwilling to see the difference, then any further explanations for your behalf would simply be a waste of electrons.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

miguy the way i see it it was the ivy league educated, fat cat insiders that brought our economy to the brink of collapse. as for me i will support the ticket with the citizen politician and the man who above else loves this country/
mccain/palin 08

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

After Obama wanted a man who may or may not make a $250,000 year income to “spead the wealth around”, that will no. 1001 reason to not vote for the man.
McCain/Palin for a better and happier tomorrow for Americans who believes in intergity, honesty and real experience needed for the office of President–not a community organizer.

Posted by: Mary | October 18, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

it was Hillary who started most of the mudslinging and character assassination attacks that the GOP picked up and have continued against Obama.
Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 18, 2008 1:39:43 AM
====
Dig your own hole.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Sarah Palin is so full of herself, McCain only further embarrassed the Republican Party with her as his VP pick.She is arrogant, close minded and not nearly qualified to be in such a high level position. Her attempts at being humorous only further add fire to my dislike of her, this Country is hurting bad and needs serious minded people in office. This campaign has only brought out hatred, fear and division amongst the American public.We are all so busy listening to personal attacks, but where are the solutions?
Only 2 public times with the press, the first one a flop and this one is basically a wash to make everyone forget the first.WTF, This lady could be running this Country, if God forbid McCain passed, and we have no clue as to what she stands for.

Posted by: PalinNoMore | October 18, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Way to go Mrs. Palin. There’s no need to tell us anymore about Obama’s past. We already know about that he’s never straight with the American people on any issue, personal or political.

Posted by: young_voter | October 18, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

– After Obama wanted a man who may or may not make a $250,000 year income to “spead the wealth around”, that will no. 1001 reason to not vote for the man. –
The above rational is a misnomer. Everyone pays taxes to support government spending. Modest increases to the 5% who earn over $250K is not spreading the wealth around. Everyone pays taxes, and it all goes to the government to fund things like homeland security, the armed forces, parks and recreation, various regulatory and administrative departments..
You cannot cut taxes and expect to raise spending, such as deciding to invade a foreign country unprovoked and spend $10 billion a month doing so.
Why do you think Bush, in his first year in office, managed to take a balanced budget and federal surplus and raise the deficit by $133 billion?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

This is what 0bama wants:
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Spread your wealth around, have a change for once..

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

6. As Governor, Sarah Palin RAISED taxes from around 10% to 20% on oil revenues. She REDISTRIBUTED the increased tax revenues to the citizens of Alaska – EXACTLY LIKE A SOCIALIST.
—-
I’m curious how you Palin supporters account for this inconvenient fact…
…Sarah Palin is as much a socialist as Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela – both tax oil companies and then redistribute the wealth.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

– From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Spread your wealth around, have a change for once.. –
Well ‘dz’, if you were expecting a tax cut under McCain, I sure hope you are making more than $100K a year as otherwise you won’t see a penny :)
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Concerned American you say hillary and mccain attack the character and not the platform? well it is hard to attack a non existent platform since it lacks a history to back it up. so we have no way of knowing that he will deliver since he has no history of doing ANYTHING. pretty words and ideas might work for you, but don’t resent us for wanting and execting a proven record. i would expect the same in making a hiring decision to hire somebody to pet sit my dogs let alone hiring somebody to serve as our president.

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Posted by: dz | Oct 18, 2008 2:07:15 AM
This is what 0bama wants:
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Spread your wealth around, have a change for once…
——
Not true.Obama is NOT going to raise our taxes, he is going to RESTORE taxes to the rates in effect under President Ronald Reagan, the original tax-cutter .
If these tax rates were good enough for Reagan, they’re good enough for me, and should be good enough for any American patriot:-)
Are you saying Ronald Reagan was a left-wing socialist?

On the other hand…Sarah Palin IS a socialist. As Governor, Sarah Palin RAISED taxes from around 10% to 20% on oil revenues. She REDISTRIBUTED the increased tax revenues to the citizens of Alaska – EXACTLY LIKE A SOCIALIST.
—-
I’m curious how you account for this inconvenient fact “dz”
…Sarah Palin is as much a socialist as Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela – both tax oil companies and then redistribute the wealth.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Mabye they can start her on solid food tommorrow. ABCs can’t be far behind.

Posted by: bubba | October 18, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

– since he has no history of doing ANYTHING. pretty words and ideas might work for you –
You obviously have no idea, and I was correct, you are indeed a waste of electrons :)
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/
I’ll just leave you with this sort of funny little ‘opps’ from your favorite gal Mrs. Palin:
““We’re going to do a few new things also,” she said at a rally in Cedar Rapids. “For instance, as Alaska’s governor, I put the government’s checkbook online so that people can see where their money’s going. We’ll bring that kind of transparency, that responsibility, and accountability back. We’re going to bring that back to D.C.”
There’s just one problem with proposing to put the federal checkbook online – somebody’s already done it. His name is Barack Obama.”
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/18/palins-transparency-proposal-already-exists-in-dc/
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

If you are so concerned you would have not expected to get welfare “tax cut” from a Zero. 0bama told you he will raise your social security cap to 150K, that’s 3100 bucks tax increase.
well, what you poor less-ducated gun and God hugging bitter people care about. You make only $3000 per year any way, hoping he will give you 33% of your income if you vote for him.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Concerned American thanks for making my point sarah did put the checkbook online obama proposes it. action versus words. anyway i have to go.

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

“miguy the way i see it it was the ivy league educated, fat cat insiders that brought our economy to the brink of collapse. as for me i will support the ticket with the citizen politician and the man who above else loves this country/
mccain/palin 08″
I hate to burst your bubble, but that citizen politician is a multimillionaire who “palls around” with other mulimillionaires, and certainly DOES NOT pal around with regular Joe citizens or even regular Joe plumbers.

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

m@chiavelli,
Am sure spreading wealth is good for you, making you feeling good too, to get free money from those idiot rich people.
I suggest you check what was carved on Karl Marx’s tombstome to understand where the core slogan and ideal of 0bama comes from.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Nevada 2
“…but don’t resent us for wanting and execting a proven record…”

McCain’s “proven” record.
1. Making the wrong call about the decision to go to war in Iraq. Continue an endless occupation of Iraq.
2. Privatize Social Security
3. Supporting the policies of deregulation that have led to the current melt-down in our financial markets.
4. Over the course of four weeks developing, proposing several entirely different, contradictory economic policies.
5. Cutting taxes, keeping spending steady, increasing the deficit and the national debt.
6. Privatizing health care, proposing policies that will do little for people who do not have health care, will probably reduce the range and type of health care offered through existing policies, and reduce the number of people who currently have health care.
7. Overturn Roe v. Wade
8. Increase international tensions in the Middle East.
9. Provoke war with Iran.
10. An erratic, irascible temperament.
—-
Palin’s proven record…
She doesn’t have one at the national level, other than a reluctance to give interviews.
See headline to this blog entry:
“For Second Time, Palin Meets the Press”
- Joe the Plumber has given more interviews to the press than Sarah Palin, yet you want to hire her?

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Posted by: dz | Oct 18, 2008 2:32:07 AM
I see that you won’t or can’t answer my questions. I’ll repeat them here, in case you missed them:
Not true.Obama is NOT going to raise our taxes, he is going to RESTORE taxes to the rates in effect under President Ronald Reagan, the original tax-cutter .
If these tax rates were good enough for Reagan, they’re good enough for me, and should be good enough for any American patriot:-)
Are you saying Ronald Reagan was a left-wing socialist?

On the other hand…Sarah Palin IS a socialist. As Governor, Sarah Palin RAISED taxes from around 10% to 20% on oil revenues. She REDISTRIBUTED the increased tax revenues to the citizens of Alaska – EXACTLY LIKE A SOCIALIST.
—-
I’m curious how you account for this inconvenient fact “dz”
…Sarah Palin is as much a socialist as Hugo Chavez, President of Venezuela – both tax oil companies and then redistribute the wealth.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

– 0bama told you he will raise your social security cap to 150K, that’s 3100 bucks tax increase. –
It’s currently at 102K, so would only change for those who make between $102 and $150K.. your figure of $3100 is not correct, it would be more like $2976 if you earned exactly $150K.
And if you are earning, as you say you are, only $3000 a year, then you don’t have to worry about it anyway.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

And, m@chiavelli, it certainly makes you proud of Zero for voting to give the big oils billions taxes breaks and for voting to allow Bush to spy on you.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

– Concerned American thanks for making my point sarah did put the checkbook online obama proposes it. –
Apparently your reading comprehension is lacking.. here, I’ll pull out the important part for you:
“In 2006 and 2007, Obama teamed up with Republican Sen. Tom Coburn to pass the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, also known as “Google for Government.” The act created a free, searchable web site – USASpending.gov — that discloses to the public all federal grants, contracts, loans and insurance payments.”
I don’t see ‘proposes’ in there anywhere, but then again, I don’t have by GOP sunglasses on either.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/18/palins-transparency-proposal-already-exists-in-dc/

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

dz:
I’m still wondering, if you are so worried about the threat of “socialism”, why don’t you find Sarah Palin more frightening. She’s the only classical socialist running in this campaign.
And if you think Obama is a socialist for restoring tax rates to the levels that applied under Ronald Reagan, then logically you’d have to argue Ronald Reagan was a socialist.
Is that what you are arguing?

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Concerned American,
Who is lying “i’m not going to raise your taxes if you make less than 250K”, be it $3100 or $2975.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

m@chiavelli,
I am voting for a pres. Don’t use scare tactics. Besides, it is Zero that I am against, not a barackudda that I am for.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

Reagan has done little good for this country, knowing nothing of the arm for hostage trade under his nose. Zero is as unfit as Bush is for that job.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Ayers is still a rich, snot, punk who wins his arguments by threaten violence:
http://noblesseoblige.org/wordpress/?p=3298
The people and politicians of Nebraska are not amused:
http://www.kfab.com/script2/print.php?page=/pages/localnews.html&article_id=4427993&feed_id=122285

Posted by: today | October 18, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

m@chiavelli,
have you googled marx’s tombstone? what it says?

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

– Who is lying “i’m not going to raise your taxes if you make less than 250K”, –
He’s not.. your federal income tax will go down if you make under $250K.. the alternative? McCain hasn’t really given one to keep Social Security going.. other than wanting to privatize a portion of it.
Here is what he said in the primary:
“A: Look, what Americans need is some straight talk. Every man, woman and child in America needs to know it’s going broke, and we’ve got to do the hard things. We’ve got to fix it for the future generations of Americans. Don’t we owe that to young Americans today? I say we do. It’s got to be bipartisan. And you have to go to the American people and say we won’t raise your taxes. We need personal savings accounts, but we got to fix this system.”
Lots of talk, without a lot of specifics.. his web site says the exact same thing.. nothing.. personal savings accounts and some bipartisan way to fix it, or else ‘he will’. Not really ‘straight talk’, particularly compared to the direct and specific plans Obama has proposed.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

– Besides, it is Zero that I am against, –
Which is typical.. your support is not for McCain, simply against Obama.. regardless of what McCains proposals will do to American and it’s citizens. Sad.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

these were windfall taxes not income taxes on the OIL BARONS-not on small businesses like obama proposes, big difference.
Over the opposition of oil companies, Republican Gov. Sarah Palin and Alaska’s Legislature last year approved a major increase in taxes on the oil industry — a step that has generated stunning new wealth for the state as oil prices soared.
mccain/palin 08

Posted by: northernlights | October 18, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

concerned,
Don’t think all voters are so easily fooled by Zero’s Harvard smart. Why do you think I worry about getting a tax cut? Why are you so selfish, asking youself, only hoping to get cash or tax cuts from Zero. The country is in deep debt, economy is tanked, your retirement accounts, if you have any, are halfed. Zero promised you trillions of new goodies, yet you only hope to get some spread wealth.
We’d be happy to pay a better america, but not by Zero’s robbing some to buy your vote.
He is unfit. I do not agree with McCain many things, but he is No Bush and he is a reasonable care taker than the alternative, the unfit Zero.

Posted by: dz | October 18, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

dz we can’t even credit him with harvard smarts since he won’t release his transcripts-the reason being what many suspect is that he registered at columbia/harvard as a kenyan citizen. he won’t release his vault birth certificate either. and won’t comply with an fic request to provide questionable online donations possible from foreign sources. too much information lacking.

Posted by: northernlights | October 18, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Gibberish–all the way back to Alaska, the only pro-American state, which is getting ready to secede from the Union.

Posted by: susan | October 18, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Somewhere in Alaska a village is missing its idiot.
“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
~~ Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Posted by: Molly | October 18, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

susan 34 us states have entered proposals to secede-it is as ameican as apple pie. if you do the research you will find that most past u.s pres have been residents of states that have sought to secede at one time or another.

Posted by: nevada 2 | October 18, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am

Palin raised taxes on oil companies after Murkowski’s previous tax regime produced falling revenues in 2007, despite skyrocketing oil prices. Alaska now has some of the highest resource taxes in the world. Alaska’s oil tax revenues are expected to be about $10 billion in 2008, twice those of previous year. BP says about half its oil revenues now go to taxes, when royalty payments to the state are included.
ConocoPhillips said that in total, once royalty payments and other taxes are added in, the state captures about 75 percent of the value of a barrel.
Of the 50 states, Alaska ranks No. 1 in taxes per resident and No. 1 in spending per resident. Its tax burden per resident is 2 1/2 times the national average; its spending, more than double.
As if it couldn’t support itself, Alaska also ranks No. 1, year after year, in money it sucks in from Washington. In 2005 (the most recent figures), according to the Tax Foundation, Alaska ranked 18th in federal taxes paid per resident ($5,434) but first in federal spending received per resident ($13,950). Its ratio of federal spending received to federal taxes paid ranks third among the 50 states, and in the absolute amount it receives from Washington over and above the amount it sends to Washington, Alaska ranks No. 1.
At the Republican National Convention, Palin bragged that she had vetoed “nearly $500 million” in state spending during her two years as governor. This amounts to less than 2% of the proposed budget.
Although Palin’s words side with McCain in this dispute, her actions side with Obama. Her major legislative accomplishment has been to revamp Alaska’s windfall-profits tax in order to increase the state’s take. Alaska calls it a “clear and equitable share” tax.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1839724-2,00.html

Posted by: Sammy | October 18, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

–( dz we can’t even credit him with harvard smarts since he won’t release his transcripts )—
Obama released his Harvard transcripts in 2005 and most of his articles are archived on line on their web site.

Posted by: dmz | October 18, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

Why haven’t I seen any investgating reporting about proof of whether Senator Obama is really an American born citizen and qualifies to run for Presidency? There appears to be some questions about this issue. Is this an illegal alien getting away with benefits “big time”?

Posted by: zz | October 18, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

–If the Leftists are so sure Obama’s going to win, then why the rancor over Sarah Palin, the insults and the smears?
–How can someone who’s ‘obviously’ on a losing ticket be so ‘dangerous’?–
Posted by: Grand Old Party
Gee, Grand Old Party, the same can said about the smears and shouts of Obama being a terrorist and anti-American. How can you Obama-haters be so scared of someone if you’re so sure he’s going to lose.
And if any of you who are shouting anti-American liberals might take the time to read a little history, go check out Joe McCarthy and his “committee” back in the 50s. Talk about right-wing craziness. It’s a shame you people can’t have an opinion and respect a different one at the same time.

Posted by: J.Martin | October 18, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

Oh, Sarah, you met the press again! You are so brave, such sacrifice! We will give you Congressional Medal of Honor!

Posted by: euro.guy | October 18, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Yes, I too am so proud of her for talking on the press. Think of the accomplishment! The courage! This is the sort of fearlessness she will show against our enemies when she is VP, or at the very least when she does the welcome speech for guests at state dinners. In years to come when she runs for office again, she will look back on this day and tell others about her scars from this interrogation and how she faced them down. Just think, with this life experience under her belt, she is now ready to embark on more serious political ventures-like SNL.

Posted by: cbot2255 | October 18, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am

I think she is fabulous. The media did a hatchet job to Hillary too. They must be every bit afraid of the women, and I wonder how well Barak would have done staying all unruffled if he had had to weather what Hillary did or Sarah does. He would have withered up.
The media does his fighting of course he can stay calm.
Tragedy of this election year is a talk show host electing a president and the media overly involved. They may prove to be very sorry one day for their lack of impartiality. we know nothing about Obama. Yeah Sarah……you are a breath of fresh air.

Posted by: catherine | October 18, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am

Catherine. Big, bad ol media is responsible once again, hmmm? Did they answer the softball questions put before her yesterday, or was it her that answered in her incomprehensible way of talk? The bottom line is that even if a candidate does not agree with the media, they have a responsibility to answer questions, face critics, without the cue card. Can you honestly say she has done that? Do you feel she can do that, because nothing suggests that she can hold her own when she speaks on her own behalf. The best she can do is go on SNL. At this point, it will make her (and her supporters) appear to be just that much more irrelevant and silly. Regardless of what you think of either campaign, do you feel comfortable with this person sitting in the White House? I am so tired of the whining about the media as a way to cover up deficiencies; particulalry given that McCain loved them until his campaign floundered and he chose a novice that does not bear up to the easiest bit of scrutiny. She is a breath of fresh air alright….

Posted by: cbot2255 | October 18, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

Anyone notice that when Sarah is not spewing hate and cynicism, she is just plain boring?

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Governor Palin has more experience than Barack Obama. As Joe Biden and Hillary said, Obama is not ready to be President. Moreover, Obama and his ACORN group have been submitting thousands of fraudulent votes in all the swing and battleground states to steal the election from McCain. That is how Obama stole the nomination from Hillary by fraudulent votes via ACORN in the tainted red caucus states. The American people should not stand for this.

Posted by: Doreen | October 18, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Did you see how the elites Obama/Biden slammed Joe the plumber. It is laughable
Joe the plumber, Bob the builder, Jill the nurse will end up paying more taxes for their success whereas Obama the politician, Bill Ayers the terrorist “professor”, Rev Wright the sick preacher, Farrakhan the racist, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton ( where is he these days) , Pelosi/Reid the socialist income distributors will have a FREE reign destroying the country
A McCain Democrat from Massachusetts…

Posted by: vs | October 18, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

No more TV news interviews?? But a comedy show is okay with her??

Posted by: sheri | October 18, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

12 years in state and federal government and he is not qualified—–but the queen of dogpatch with a year as gov of alaska is—ha ha ha ha ha ha just the kind of people mccain likes—nts

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

sheri
all she has to do is act natural—or imitate tina–which would be natural.
perhaps she will get lost on the bridge to nowhwere.wonder why she is stopping the hate campaign—one ill informed scary woman.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Marion, if doing cocaine is a disqualifier how will you remedy the last disastrous 8 years under Bush, who is a known cokehead?

Posted by: Susan | October 18, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Did you hear”kill him”?didn’t you?american pleasant media has gone far in supporting sen.Barak Obama,forcing him to lie in the last debate on allegations he didn’t double-cheick.The inestigation is asking a tape where “kill him”is recorded;ABC,CNN,CBS,Chris,Olberman,Madow and consorts,do you have this tape?

Posted by: Pierre Bidou | October 18, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Sheri said: “No more TV news interviews?? But a comedy show is okay with her??”
————————-
Alright, I can’t resist – Every time she opens her mouth it’s a comedy show….

Posted by: cbot2255 | October 18, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

joe thr plumber worried about paying taxes—-mccain is a total nut case—that guy is worried about netting over 250 thousand a year–the idiot only makes 40 thousand–and in no way shape or form will he ever net 250 thousand—just more mccain bs—as he dont have a clue on the issues.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

palins report 160 thousand but have millions in assets—-that is the kind of job and fuzzy math we all should have.perhaps a visit by the irs is in order.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Sarah Plain does not connect to MOST Americans, she connects with the 23% of white trash, racist, gun totin, Bible thumpin, crreation science beleivin, speak in tongues, wack jobs that dot our small towns in those vast acres of rusted trailors and old dirty pickups with Confederate flags in the back window.
The rest of us can read and see her for the wackjob she is.

Posted by: PJC27 | October 18, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Obama! Spread the wealth!
Palin won’t starve.
She knows how to catch fish,
shoot and she will be able to feed
her family.

Posted by: pippa | October 18, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

mccain is angry about obamas tax proposals—as mccain will have to give up some of the 5 million they made last year–and you think he cares about us working stiffs….mccain is worried about mccain—

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

When she speaks unscripted, she reveals that she is really a dumb person who thinks she is smart. She makes up words that she thinks sound “smart”, there is no sense of organization to her thoughts and, therefor, her sentence structure.

Posted by: Mary | October 18, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

the us government needs to come down on alaska for the wilfull slaughter of wolves—–something that infuriates the native people—-palin is a sick piece of work.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

What experience does Obama have? I have yet heard of any except him being a junior senator and a 2 year senator who has spent a million dollars a day in Pork.

Posted by: BHOisBLAH | October 18, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

ever hear of the bridge to nowhere—talk about pork—-miss piggy is the queen of pork.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Obama State Senator of Ill.
Ill. Higest crime rate in country
Ill. Highest tax rate in country
Ill. Highest unemployment in country
Dems can’t blame republicans because the whole state is ran by Dems. Far left liberals.

Posted by: Help us | October 18, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

There are more murders in Illinois then there are killings in Iraq at this time. I think it is time for us to pull out of Illinois.

Posted by: Help us | October 18, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Maybe Obama should of used that $3 million projector to show us how bad Illinois is and how he would change our country to the better. LMAO

Posted by: Help us | October 18, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Peggy Noonan just jumped on the bandwagon of conservatives who think Palin is unfit. Matthew Dowd (Bush’s campaign strategist in 2004), George Will, David Frum, David Brooks, Peggy Noonan, etc, etc.
Intelligent conservatives think she’s a disaster.

Posted by: bubba | October 18, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

always remember as stated by mccain—-100 year war ok—–due to nafta we are living in an era of prosperity——bomb bomb iran—-we are all georgians today—-we are still at war in iraq billions a month tyhe cost–the surge the surge-more bs.colombis needs to have free trade with us,do we actually have a few more jobs to give up.the fundamentals of our economy are strong,statement as wall st colapses—THESE ARE ALL FACTS THAT MCCAIN HAS STATED OVER THE LAST FEW MONTHS—I THINK HE SPEAKS FOR HIMSELF AS WE ALL KNOW HOW FAR OUT OF TOUCH HE IS ON THE REAL ISSUES—-AND HIS HATE CAMPAIGN IS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING ALONG WITH THE TWIT HE PICKED FOR VP.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

The campaign would be better off letting her go untouched by her handlers. At least give her a shot at ripping Obama without the safety net.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | October 18, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

The New York Times is reporting today(Saturday)
that Obama is/has spent $188 million dollars buying t.v. advertising.
How disturbing in light of our present economy, the fact that he rejected campaign finance reform, and the fact that people are tired of all these ads. Any thinking American knows that the ads on both sides are nothing other than paid propangda. If this is the change we are seeking no thanks. America needs a third party.

Posted by: rafraf | October 18, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Rodney so you are saying we should pull out of Illinois also. American people are being murdered and the State is a crumb hole. There are more murders in Illinois then there are killings in Iraq at this time. I think it is time for us to pull out of Illinois.
Maybe Obama should of used that $3 million projector to show us how bad Illinois is and how he would change our country to the better.
Dems can’t blame republicans because the whole state of Ill. is ran by Dems. Far left liberals.
Obama State Senator of Ill.
Ill. Higest crime rate in country
Ill. Highest tax rate in country
Ill. Highest unemployment in country

Posted by: Help us | October 18, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

How about asking her why she and McCain are now implying that Obama is involved in voter fraud? That is a pretty serious charge, but no one has asked the Republicans to produce proof.
I am sick of listening to Republican fear mongering.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 18, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

I HAVE TO GO TO work
however you right wing extremests can put on youy sheets and pillowcases burn a few crosses and run around screeming till i come back–still dreaming of netting over 250 thousand a year so i can pay more taxes…ha ha ha h a what a bunch of losers.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

El_Pajaro are you an American or giving illegal money to Obama from antoher country???

Posted by: Help us | October 18, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

MIguy – it has nothing to do with decency. She got pressured by the McCain campaign itself. You may notice that McCain, also, is dropping this tack. The robocalls are taking over. This way, McCain and Palin can be perceived as going “positive” and the RNC can do the dirty work.

Posted by: counting crows | October 18, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election:
>
> CAPITAL GAINS TAX
>
> MCCAIN
> 0% on home sales up to $500,000
> per home (couples) McCain does not
> propose any change in existing
> home sales income tax.
>
> OBAMA
> 28% on profit from ALL home sales
>
> How does this affect you?
> If you sell your home and make a profit, you
> will pay 28% of your gain on taxes.
> If you are heading toward retirement
> and would like to down-size your
> home or move into a retirement
> community, 28% of the money you
> make from your home will go to taxes. This
> proposal will adversely affect the
> elderly who are counting on the income
> from their homes as part of their retirement income.
>
> DIVIDEND TAX
>
> MCCAIN 15% (no change)
>
> OBAMA 39.6%
>
> How will this affect you?
> If you have any money invested in stock
> market, IRA, mutual funds,
> college funds, life insurance, retirement
> accounts, or anything that pays
> or reinvests dividends, you will now
> be paying nearly 4 0% of the money
> earned on taxes if Obama become president.
> The experts predict that ‘higher
> tax rates on dividends and capital gains
> would crash the stock market yet
> do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.
>
> INCOME TAX
>
> MCCAIN (no changes)
>
> Single making 30K – tax $4,500
> Single making 50K – tax $12,500
> Single making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 60K- tax $9,000
> Married making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 125K – tax $31,250
>
> OBAMA
> (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
> Single making 30K – tax $8,400
> Single making 50K – tax $14,000
> Single making 75K – tax $23,250
> Married making 60K – tax $16,800
> Married making 75K – tax $21,000
> Married making 125K – tax $38,750
>
> Under Obama your taxes will
> more than double!
> How does this affect you? No explanation
> needed. This is pretty
> straight forward.
>
> INHERITANCE TAX
>
> MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
>
> OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax
>
> How does this affect you? Many families
> have lost businesses,
> farms and ranches, and homes
> that have
> been in their families
> for generations because they could not
> afford the inheritance tax.
> Those willing their assets to loved
> ones will not only lose them tothese taxes.
>
> NEW TAXES BEING PROPOSED BY OBAMA
>
> * New government taxes proposed on
> homes that are more than
> 2400 square feet
>
> * New gasoline taxes (as if
> gas weren’t high enough already)
>
> * New taxes on natural resources
> consumption (heating
> gas, water, electricity)
>
> * New taxes on retirement accounts
> and last but not least….
>
> * New taxes to pay for socialized medicine
> so we can receive the same
> level of medical care as other
> third-world countries!!!

Posted by: BLAHBHO | October 18, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Finally, someone realizes that Palin as the pitt bull is not a pleasing voice to any but the extreme right. She has re-energized the base, now she tones it down for the rest of the country… Still, first impressions are lasting ones. As she tones it down, I still look at her own house affairs which appear to be out of order. I look to her former gov’t experience in which she has been founded guilty of abusing power no matter how she wants to define that abuse. Then personally, I look at her interjection of her personal religious beliefs into her political comments and while that is attractive to many, to others, not so much. There is no doubt, the belief in Spirit elevates us to a higher moral character, however, past events have proven that the humility of religion is susceptible to and can become overly intoxicated with the power and corruption of political ambition. The two should never become bedfellows, but only the very best of friends.

Posted by: braith | October 18, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

another freaking nut

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

I don’t want Obama spread my hard worked money to where he thinks it should go and a lot of it will go to 3rd world countrie. A lot will go to Kenya to help Obama and his presence there.

Posted by: help us | October 18, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

No one is talking about the security of our Nation. I am very afraid of our security and Obama will jepordize this if elected. Bush has done a great job for our country’s security but no one wants to talk about this. He has kept these terroist in check since 9/11.

Posted by: help us | October 18, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Palin has MESMERIZED everyone! It is all too obvious that some are afraid and confused, while others are ENAMOURED with her unique combination of personality and political talent and power. Yes, the type of fresh air and change the Gov. brings is the REAL CHANGE that Red, White and Blue America needs…not the kind of reform Obama advertises.

Posted by: earlejohn | October 18, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

braith Then you should really be afraid of Obama and his association with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Retzko, Fannie/Freddie and the list goes on and on.

Posted by: BLAHBHO | October 18, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

McCain has 1 new ad running that packs a punch but does no negative stuff. My wife commented that she liked it and that as soon as a negative ad came on she tuned out. It ran twice in a 2 hour period so it wasn’t obnoxious.
Obama and some senate democratic committee is running ads about every commercial break (spending all that money I suppose) but there is a point when sensory overload occurs and you simply tune them out.
And the phone calls…. we have just stopped answering any of them, turned the answering machine off and turned the ringer way down.

Posted by: david | October 18, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

braith You talk about Sarah Palin and her faith. What about Obama and his faith. Rev. Wright, Obama went to his church for 20 years and listened to his Hate Whitey, Hate America sermons for 20 years. How about his faith?

Posted by: BLAHBHO | October 18, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Peggy Noonan just jumped on the bandwagon of conservatives who think Palin is unfit. Matthew Dowd (Bush’s campaign strategist in 2004), George Will, David Frum, David Brooks, Peggy Noonan, etc, etc.
Intelligent conservatives think she’s a disaster.

Posted by: bubba | October 18, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Ultimately, Palin has no real ideas and no real unifying voice for the country at a time when it needs it the most. If you want to show you are not like George Bush, you choose a running mate who is Bush’s opposite – articulate, intelligent, thoughtful, open, respectful, and entirely ethical. To do less than that continues to invite comparisons to Bush.
I’m sure she will be funny tonight on SNL, but I’m not looking to elect a joker.

Posted by: 1percenter | October 18, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Biden has a three leter word
supercalafragulisousxbaladocious.
what’s Joe’s postion on gay marraige today? Depends on whether he is on a straight or gay person’s talk show.

Posted by: geevill | October 18, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

To hell with Palin, she thinks you have to live in an inbred hick town to be “pro-american”.
Palin, go back to Alaska you pentecoast fascist secessionist freak!.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 18, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

If Obama gets elected I hope everyone realizes you will have given him a clear path to socialism.Do you really want to give up your right to pursue happiness?Do you want Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Nancy Pelosi running your lives???

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 18, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

reddog what about McCains refundable health care tax rebates? Even people WHO DOESNT PAY TAX will get those. Isnt that wellfare? Isnt that socialism?

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 18, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Both Sen.Mecain and Governor Palin are hpocritically behaving in the campaign.
Monie, London

Posted by: Monie | October 18, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

rodney soon would need no mo work. Zero will spread the wealth, taking from the rich idiots and giving ya poor less-educated lazybones. Zero promised you an empty $1000 free money to give you if you vote for him. You can sit on your butt, enjoying the fruit of the rich, thanks to Zero’s ideal of equal opportunity, or spreading wealth.

Posted by: foolya | October 18, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

rodney soon would need no mo work. Zero will spread the wealth, taking from the rich idiots and giving ya poor less-educated lazybones. Zero promised you an empty $1000 free money to give you if you vote for him. You can sit on your butt, enjoying the fruit of the rich, thanks to Zero’s ideal of equal opportunity, or spreading wealth.

Posted by: foolya | October 18, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It will be great sport watching the freaks here assembled go crazy and start attacking SNL when Gov. Palin is treated to balanced and respectable humor. Don’t forget to take your blood pressure meds, dear people.

Posted by: jcarob | October 18, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Now that ‘Joe the plummer’ is found to be economical with truth as regards to the nature of job he does, the level of taxation he pays(owing money to the govt.!)and also about his name, does not it look a bit embarassing and self-defeating for Republican party to parade the person in the campaign?
Nur

Posted by: Nur | October 18, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

reddog what about McCains refundable health care tax rebates? Even people WHO DOESNT PAY TAX will get those. Isnt that wellfare? Isnt that socialism?
Posted by: JoeShmoe | Oct 18, 2008 9:46:30 AM
To a degree it is.You will still have a choice of where to get it.Obamas plan you will get into a system that if you do not have insurance you can get goverment insurance that is suppose to drive the cost down.Since when does a company lower its prices when it knows this is your only choice???

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 18, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Why do i detest this woman? 6 years 6 colleges. She is obviously not smart. She is obviously inexperienced. She is not really having any presidential qualities. She is like the FARGO detective.Being a heart beat away from becoming president is not helping the matter either. It is scary to think of her commander in chief of the most powerful country.

Posted by: Cosmo Kramer | October 18, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

BlahBHO,,, the way you think about Obama, whatever your concerns towards his past, his policies, the issues, your fears of the direction he will take the country, I understand because I think the exact same way about McCain and Palin. I am not being sarcastic or mean spirited. You have every right to your view and I to mine. I don’t trust McCain, I don’t trust his health and Palin is just too far away from issues that are important to me as woman, to find common ground with her. PERSONALLY, I would wish there was no far right, nor far left. I am an Indep. turned Dem.
As Bush has proven, the only answer to a Capitalism gone wild is Socialism. There is not a darn thing wrong with Capitalism until it wobbles out balance and Socialism must come to its “Rescue”. Capitalism works best upon a strong economic foundation. That foundation is faltering and will have to be reconstructed from the “ground up..”
Once there, you guys can go wild and crazy again. I am sure you are a good person, as I like to think of myself also as a good person. I just can’t find it in me, to trust McCain with Palin who could step in the Presidential role at anytime to move this country forward. I didn’t set out to be a Liberal lune or an Obama bot, but I’ll take that. So how do I trust Obama? It took me awhile, but I noticed that he could rise up above the situation and the accusations, he has confidence and a calm demeanor, he obviously loves his wife and children, and he comes from the ground up. I am with him on the issues. As a white woman, I believe he is very much aware that he will be watched closely, more closely than we have ever watched any white man in the position. I like that he seems progressive, even in his campaigning he has shaken things up. He has certainly made me pay attention. The attacks McCain has made on Obama only makes me take a closer look at McCain and Palin… They say that women don’t like negative attack ads and this is true… yeas Obama was negative when he had to be…
Regardless of who gets in, it will be a tough road ahead for all of us. We all need to brace ourselves for the unexpected because all that has happened is only the beginning. Things will get worse before they get better. No matter who gets elected, no doubt, each side will blame the other for our current situations…

Posted by: braith | October 18, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Nur,
It not about joe the plumber it is about wealth redistibution something this country was not founded on.

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 18, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Sarah Palin will need the money to help take care of her unwed daughter,
She does not want a Palin grandchild on Public Welfare in Alaska.
_____________
….SHE’s not going to pay for it! Her daughters boyfriend is QUITING HIGH SCHOOL to go to work to pay for everything. Now there’s some family support for you! Sarah Palin is representing “values” that are destroying families, not preserving them. Both of those kids need desperately to finish thier educations, and get some birth control pills after this kids is born. “Just say no” is a joke!

Posted by: LittleMissMooseShooter | October 18, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

braith,
Time and time again you allow the goverment in the door they continue to let themselves in more and more.

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 18, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

The same dummies who voted for George Bush are thrilled by Sarah Palin. She has that same down to earth personality that hides her ignorance. My question is: Do you want a female Bush in the White House? It could happen. I wonder who she would pick for her VP? Ann Coulter? Pat Robertson? Or, maybe, Bill O’Reilly. Way to go, America.

Posted by: Judy | October 18, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

reddog… I think Your Rep. Pres. Bush has accomplished the most for the government letting themselves through the door. I am suspicious of the timing in all of this economic collapse, conveniently as he prepares to exit the White House.

Posted by: braith | October 18, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

“Since when does a company lower its prices when it knows this is your only choice???”
Posted by: reddog0216
Oh you mean like McCain contributor Harry Sargeant III, the guy who is under investigation for war profiteering for delivering fuel to the Army in Iraq to sky high prices? Cos he was the only one with connections with arabs in Jordan
And why has so many arabs contributed to political campaigns through Sargeant?

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 18, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Thank you Republicans for being civil in your disagreements, I have to go to Indy today. It’s been fun but I have to get myself ready. You guys have a great day.

Posted by: braith | October 18, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

reddog… one more thing… That Patriot Act that Bush rushed in…Also, lets the gov.t through any door it wants to open at anytime… I’m just saying….gotta go…

Posted by: braith | October 18, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

McCain = Obama….Big banks vote yes to either!

Posted by: kennedy | October 18, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

braith ,
You need to look no further than Fannie mae and frddie mac for all of the economic mess FRANK DODD PELOSI they were all responsible and should go to jail.

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 18, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Mccain = Obama, Big banks vote yes to wither!

Posted by: kennedy | October 18, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-117223
Why has their been a double standard by McCain-Palin supporters this entire campaign?

Posted by: mybrainreallyhurts | October 18, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Mybrainreallyhurts: Because they have the same leader….The Fed! It prints double standards for both candidate’s. They’re free! Bernake is laughing either way we go….it’s a win/win

Posted by: kennedy | October 18, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

One guy said vote Obama for your children. What children the ones that will be sacrificed by abortions that are rampant when he ratifies through a filibuster proof senate the Freedom of Choice Act? Go Google Obama FOCA. Read for yourself. Have a moral issue with Abortion, happy that you don’t have to pay for someone else’s? You won’t have a choice now–His law would force states and insurances to pay for it under women’s reproductive health clauses. SAD DAY FOR AMERICA!!!!

Posted by: Adams | October 18, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

There is a new strategy coming out of the McCain campaign in case you haven’t noticed….. ” Let’s paint Obama and his supporters as Communists. He’s a terrorist if you are concerned about America’s safety and a Communist if you are concerned about the economy. John McCain is being kept awake by meds and if he wins, won’t even make it to Inauguration Day….. as luck would have it….. Welcome Sarah Palin ” You betcha”

Posted by: Ron | October 18, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

There is a new strategy coming out of the McCain campaign in case you haven’t noticed….. ” Let’s paint Obama and his supporters as Communists. He’s a terrorist if you are concerned about America’s safety and a Communist if you are concerned about the economy. John McCain is being kept awake by meds and if he wins, won’t even make it to Inauguration Day….. as luck would have it….. Welcome Sarah Palin ” You betcha”

Posted by: Ron | October 18, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Did any reporters ask her if she still thinks that the Troopergate Report didn’t find her guilty of abusing her power?
Maybe by now she’s actually read the report….

Posted by: Rodger | October 18, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Sarah Palin being an idiot is GREAT NEWS!!! For John McCain!!!

Posted by: Congratulations to President-Elect McCain!!! | October 18, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

McCain’s association with Liddy isn’t news. The Chicago Tribune covered it back in May, when the Clinton campaign was roadtesting the McCain campaign’s tactics. Let’s compare:
* Bill Ayers participated in bombing a statue, the New York Police headquarters, the U.S. Capitol, and the Pentagon. G. Gordon Liddy participated in a White house plot to subvert the Constitution.
* Ayers has never been convicted or served prison time. Liddy was convicted of conspiracy, burglary, and illegal wire-tapping, was senteced to 20 years, and served 5.5 until President Carter commuted his sentence.
* Ayers is now a professor of education. Liddy is a conservative talk radio host.
* Ayers has said “we didn’t do enough” to stop the Vietnam War, a statement interpreted by some to mean he thinks he should have set off more bombs in the early 1970s. In 1994, after the feds stormed the branch Davidian compound in Waco, Liddy said on his radio program, [sorry, rough language coming] “Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests. … Kill the sons of bitches.” (And as for Liddy on Hitler….)
* Ayers and his wife hosted a campaign event at his house for Obama in 1995. Liddy hosted a campaign event for McCain in 1998.
* Ayers donated $200 to Obama in 2001. Liddy has given at least $5,000 to McCain over the years, including $1,000 this year.
* Senator Obama has called Ayers’ terrorist acts “despicable” and condemned them. Senator McCain appeared on Liddy’s radio show last November and said, “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family…. It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.”
I’m not going to bother with quantifying the sins of Ayers and Liddy. And please note, I offer no defense of Ayers here. Go ahead, assume the worst of both men, and you can say, as does Chapman, that each man “back in the 1970s, extolled violence and committed crimes in the name of a radical ideology — and… has never shown remorse or admitted error.”
It’s simple: if you think Ayers is a voting issue, then you must think Liddy is a voting issue. Have fun voting for Barr or Nader.

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Maybe Obama should of used that $3 million projector to show us how bad Illinois is and how he would change our country to the better. LMAO
Nice to see you find yourself so entertaining. Maybe if you really took time to research the facts, instead of blindly believing what your Grandpa McCain is telling you, you would learn something.
That projector replaces an outdated piece of equipment from the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, a mecca for school children all over the midwest, and a place where, for generations, children and adults alike have learned about the solar system. Also, its a major tourist attraction for the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois, generating millions in revenue..
Of course, you wouldn’t be interested, because your solar system only consists of your sick little world where you bow at the altar of deceit and falsehoods of Gramps and Caribou Barbie

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

What bunch of cry babies!! Sara Palin is as qualified as OBama any day of the week and if OBama becomes our President, within 1 year you will be wishing you had voted for McCain because your taxes are going to go up about 50% and your savings down! You won’t be able to save! There will be nothing left over after you pay for everyone who is not working so that the “wealth will be distributed equally.” God help us!!!!!!!

Posted by: M. Summer | October 18, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Ron | Oct 18, 2008 11:19:52 AM
There is a new strategy coming out of the McCain campaign in case you haven’t noticed….. ” Let’s paint Obama and his supporters as Communists…[and terrorist].
————–
McCain/Palin’s New Talking Points Memo:
1. Paint Obama & supporters (though why not Joe Biden, then?) as Communists
2. Paint Obama (though why not Joe Biden, then?) as terrorist.
3. Paint Obama as a secret Muslim.
4. Keep Sarah Palin from talking to the press (though let her appear on comedy shows!).
5. Talk about ACORN, ACORN, all the time. Strive to link ACORN to voter fraud as much as possible.
- Stir up confusion of voter registration and ACORN’s roll in registering new voters.
- Create impression that ACORN (rather than some of ACORN’s hired, free-lance canvassers) has been deliberately creating false registrations.
- Further confuse the issue:
*neglect to point out that it is NOT ACORN’s job to confirm that a voter’s registration is in fact legal, but that this is the job of the election board according to applicable rules in each state;
*neglect to point out that in many states ACORN is legally required to hand in voter registrations it already knows to be false;
*neglect to point out that in many cases it is ACORN that has uncovered false registrations and brought these fake registrations to the attention of the election boards!
—-
In short, McCain/Palin hope to win this election by stirring up anger against Obama, and by suppressing the vote.
They’ve recognized they cannot win on the merits of their own programs & policies – because they have none.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

NEWSFLASH! NEWSFLASH! NEWSFLASH!
Barack Hussein Obama is a secret CAPITALIST who favors SMALL BUSINESSES.
Full text of exchange between Obama and Joe the Plumber:
—-
Sam “Joe” Wurzelbacher says it seems like Obama would be for a flat tax.
Obama replies:
“you know, I would be open to it except here’s the problem with a flat tax is that if you actually put a flat tax together, in order for it to work and replace all the rvenue that we’ve got, you’d probably end up having to make it like about a 40% sales tax. I mean that’s the value added, making it up. Now some people say 23 or 25, but in truth when you add up all the revenue that would need to be raised, you’d have to slap on a whole bunch of sales taxes on.
And I do believe for folks like me who have worked hard, but frankly also been lucky, I don’t mind paying just a little bit more than the waitress that I just met over there who’s things are slow and she can barely make the rent.
Because my attitude is that,,.
…IF THE ECONOMY’S GOOD FOR FOLKS FROM THE BOTTOM UP, IT’S GOOD FOR EVERYBODY.
If you’ve got a plumbing business
…YOU’RE GOONA BE BETTER OFF IF YOU’VE GOT A WHOLE BUNCH OF CUSTOMERS WHO CAN AFFORD TO HIRE YOU,
…and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think ***when you spread the wealth around***, it’s good for everybody…”
—-

Posted by: m@chiavelli | October 18, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I don’t think I’ve seen a woman get inside of so many people’s heads since Dr. Ruth.
Oh, and about Obama’s projector: The Minneapolis Planetarium needed about $3,000,000 worth of renovations but Minnesotans took it from the state coffers and private grants.
When Obama’s hands aren’t adjusting his laurel wreath there in somebody else’s pockets.
P.T.Barnum would have loved this charleton.

Posted by: Shawn Rogers | October 18, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

If the press had spent 1/10th , ONE TENTH of the time trawling through Obama’s background, relationships (I refuse to call them associations, that’s Obama-talk for the dumbos out there, mainly the main-stream media and the idiots voting for him), and examined some or any part of his life that doesn’t quite fit, then I would say fair is fair. But the media the wonderful, left wing media that is now running this country…into the ground has not and will not scrunitize Obama the way they are done Palin and twisted everything and anything. That is why we are having to hear tidbits here and snippets there about his seedy background and I’ll bet the ranch (well my house before I have to foreclose on when Obama gets in) more stuff is going to come out about this imposter from Chicago. These people are only the b actors in the cast of characters this man has “associated” with world-wide. Where are the FBI and CIA, don’t they report the truth about his pasts?
Poor Katie Couric will be unemployed next year, the gotcha “journalist” and I use that term lightly is not wanted back at her old morning seat. No thank you! Her ratings are the talking point of CBS! Had she been smart, as smart as she thinks she is, she could have used the Palin interview like SNL or others will to get a ratings draw! But that’s the socialists for ya! Can’t see a good thing when they have it.

Posted by: Josie | October 18, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Whoop do doo! Wow! The press has to make a “special report” when she does talk to the press. The woman who could be a heartbeat away from the presidency and who will have to talk to world leaders all the time…. she is afraid to talk to the press from her own country! Sometime or the other people have to know that she can’t wink and flirt her way into world politics.

Posted by: Susan | October 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Cindy McCain can start thinking about helping some ordinary Americans who are struggling. Instead os spending $300,000 on one dress. John McCain is so out of touch with what ordinary Americans are feeling and struggling with everyday. Enough is enough!!!

Posted by: Angella | October 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Oh, and about Obama’s projector: The Minneapolis Planetarium needed about $3,000,000 worth of renovations but Minnesotans took it from the state coffers and private grants.
—————————————
that’s very honorable of you to suggest that Illinois and Chicago should pay for the planetarium. But I think that improving the public’s appreciation for science, especially children, is something all Americans can chip in on, regardless of where it is. Also, Illinois sends out more money in taxes than it receives in federal funds (unlike Arizona and especially Alaska). So, if some of that money comes back to Chicago in the form of a projector for a planetarium, I have no problem with that. this “projector” (as Gramps McCain described it) is one of the most sophisticated in the world, and also is in danger being irrepairable. I guess $10 billion a month for the Bush/McCain war in Iraq is fine, but ask for 3 million to maybe one day inspire the future scientists of tomorrow is silly. Right?

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

She has dragged down whatever slim hopes McErratic had of winning a fair vote. Their only chance now is that Scalia, Thomas, and the rest of the Gang of Five will hand them the presidency like they did for Dubbya. We will see whether two Admirals can match a full house of Preppies in winning favor from the Supremes. BTW, when the repubs lose, do you think Palin will be on their top 25 for the nomination in 2012? She’s apparently #2 this year–how quickly the mediocre are forgotten!!

Posted by: PolarBear | October 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

The Michelle Obama story to be updated tomorrow the 19th of October
Posted by africanpress on October 18, 2008
We would like to inform all our readers that update on Michelle Obama story will be released tomorrow.
We have understood the importance that the American people put into electing the right candidate for the Presidency.
It is important that the tapes be released and all can judge for themselves what Mrs Obama meant and why it has come at the near-end of electioneering. The fact that the mainstream American media has been reluctant to reveal what they know about Obama is very unfortunate.
The American mainstream media seems to be interested in excitement and we all know that the only excitement at present is for some to say they witnessed history of some kind – the election of a black man to govern the only powerful nation in the world.
All the readers should exercise patience. We in API promise that you will get to know the truth when the recordings are finally released.
——
Published by Chief Editor/ African Press International – API

Posted by: Give Michelle A Microphone Please | October 18, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

It has been said that “You can tell a lot about a man by who his friends are.”
So I think that Obama’s decisions to stay with Wright in spite of the hate-filled things he was preaching and to work with Ayers even to the point of launching his political career in the man’s house in spite of knowing that he was a murderous terrorist–I think that says a lot about what kind of man Obama is. You may call that a smear, but let’s face it, it’s also the simple truth. If a man’s friends are evil, what does that say about the man?
Besides that factor, I just plain don’t trust Obama; he strikes me as a political opportunist trying not to offend anyone in order to get their votes. That’s the only explanation I can see for why he voted “Present” all those times. Basically, I think he lacks the courage of his convictions.

Posted by: Jennifer | October 18, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

“It has been said that “You can tell a lot about a man by who his friends are.”
So I think that Obama’s decisions to stay with Wright in spite of the hate-filled things he was preaching and to work with Ayers even to the point of launching his political career in the man’s house in spite of knowing that he was a murderous terrorist–I think that says a lot about what kind of man Obama is. You may call that a smear, but let’s face it, it’s also the simple truth. If a man’s friends are evil, what does that say about the man?”
—————————————-
Agreed. So let’s keep pressing Gramps McCain on his association with G Gordon Liddy, one of the most evil and coldhearted people in American History.
Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as “an old friend,” and McCain sounded like one. “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family,” he gushed. “It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.”
In 1994, Liddy offered some advice to the Branch Davidians who were under seige from Feds..his advice? “Shoot for the head, they are wearing bulletproof vests” Later he amended that to, “You can probably get them in the groin, too”..
And then finally, this little anecdote..”when I do my target practice, I name my two targets Bill and Hillary”

Posted by: captain | October 18, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Maybe Palin will play a lunatic brainless bimbo on SNL? Oh wait…

Posted by: Julie | October 18, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

So Sarah Palin met with the press again for 7 minutes. Big whoop. Now if only she were brave enough to appear on “Meet the Press.”

Posted by: Rudy | October 18, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

She’s a buffoon!

Posted by: PGelsman | October 18, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

I’m pro-American. I’m pro-Obama. What the heck is this woman thinking?

Posted by: paintpaintpaint | October 18, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Kim you wrote:
“Keep speaking for America, Sarah.We need common sense in Washington instead of the rhetoric of a lawyer!”
No disrespect Kim but that’s a contradiction if ever I heard one!
Palin and common sense don’t belong in the same sentence!
Seriously Kim, Palin is not fit to be in the race,let alone anywhere near the White House.
American and the world needs someone that understands the issues, and Palin is certainly not that person by any stretch of the imagination!

Posted by: KL | October 18, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Sarah Palin is not mentioning Ayers now because the republicans are blastings our phones with their robo calls!
People are not stupid and will see all of this for what it is. We also know that the
Acorn issue is a distraction from the republicans own campaign to suppress votes!

Posted by: American MOmi | October 18, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

The new Palin/McCAIN tactic. Pretend to be responsible, talk nice, save the vile, despicable acts to go through surrogates, mail and robo calls or when the press isn’t paying too much attention to you.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 19, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

“Agreed. So let’s keep pressing Gramps McCain on his association with G Gordon Liddy, one of the most evil and coldhearted people in American History.”
1. It is just as improper to mock McCain because of his age as it is to mock Obama because of his race.
2. G. Gordon Liddy is as harmless as Barney the Dinosaur compared to Ayers. I think you should read this account by John Murtagh, who was a child when the Weathermen tried to murder his parents (and him, as he was in the house with them) with bombs which were set off at their house while they were asleep.
“I still recall, as though it were a dream, thinking that someone was lifting and dropping my bed as the explosions jolted me awake, and I remember my mother’s pulling me from the tangle of sheets and running to the kitchen where my father stood. Through the large windows overlooking the yard, all we could see was the bright glow of flames below. We didn’t leave our burning house for fear of who might be waiting outside. The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn. Sunlight, the next morning, revealed three sentences of blood-red graffiti on our sidewalk: FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS.
For the next 18 months, I went to school in an unmarked police car. My mother, a schoolteacher, had plainclothes detectives waiting in the faculty lounge all day. My brother saved a few bucks because he didn’t have to rent a limo for the senior prom: the NYPD did the driving. We all made the best of the odd new life that had been thrust upon us, but for years, the sound of a fire truck’s siren made my stomach knot and my heart race. In many ways, the enormity of the attempt to kill my entire family didn’t fully hit me until years later, when, a father myself, I was tucking my own nine-year-old John Murtagh into bed.
Though no one was ever caught or tried for the attempt on my family’s life, there was never any doubt who was behind it. Only a few weeks after the attack, the New York contingent of the Weathermen blew themselves up making more bombs in a Greenwich Village townhouse. The same cell had bombed my house, writes Ron Jacobs in The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground. And in late November that year, a letter to the Associated Press signed by Bernardine Dohrn, Ayers’s wife, promised more bombings.”
Go here for the full article:
http://patdollard.com/2008/09/husseins-buddy-ayers-tried-to-kill-my-family/
NOW do remember what the word “terrorist” implies?

Posted by: Jennifer | October 19, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

The leftwingers give a lot of hate, don’t they.

Posted by: Christie | October 19, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

People who say that Obama is left-wing should compare his platform to the platforms of other leaders around the world. If you do this, you will find that Obama’s platform would be considered centrist or perhaps even a bit conservative.
Compare McCain’s platform to others around the world and you won’t find anything like it anywhere. It’s waay out there, totally, completely, over-the-top right wing,
Perhaps a bit of perspective is necessary.

Posted by: Fran Taylor | October 19, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

I don’t think I’ve seen a woman get inside of so many people’s heads since Dr. Ruth.
Posted by: Shawn Rogers | Oct 18, 2008 1:15:20 PM
=========================
mmmm please tell me you’re single…
*barf*
ARE YOU SERIOUS? did you REALLY JUST SAID THAT????
some people are an embarrasment to humanity. period.

Posted by: GIGI | October 19, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Yes, Jennifer they certainly do.

Posted by: Jeff | October 19, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

I’m so sick of listening to Hollywood and the Latte’ drinking groups say how inspiring Obama is……..Please, Bottom Line, they love him because he’s Black, this country has such a guilt trip about race that it’s blinding them…….I’m a Hispanic woman and I know about prejudice. It’s shameful how blacks were treated in the past but that’s not why Obama should be president.
I’m mad as Hell because I lost my country to someone with Obama’s philosophies and ideals, Cuba to be more specific, and when I hear Obama talk; he always tries to please everyone, he’s promising everything under the sun just to get elected, give me a break, then he’ll flip flop to do what’s politically expedient for him. You can argue that McCain has done some of the same, as all politicians do, but Obama has changed on many more positions and Obama claims he’s not a politician, he’s the agent of change………
Good Grief, My God, the only change this man wants is a Socialist America. Oh well, I’m 44 years old and I never thought I would see in this Great Country a repeat of Fidel Castro’s tactics, remember Castro started influencing the inexperienced Youth vote first , then Castro’s ideals spread like the plague to the rest of the population just like Obama is trying to do, I guess Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright and Castro really influenced Obama’s life in forming the man he is today and some Americans just don’t appreciate the life and freedoms we enjoy in this great country; American’s just don’t understand that ” the American way of life” can be taken away from them in a blink of an eye. God Bless America and protect her from men that think like Obama because if these people come to power and the Congress and Senate share in the same ideals, in my opinion, this country is over, Capitalism will be dead to the world and that would be the end of the Greatest Nation on the planet……………I just hope that America will wake up……God Bless America

Posted by: Nevada | October 19, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am

Governor Palin’s performance doesn’t match her rhetoric
By Richard A. Fineberg
I’ve spent a good portion of the last 35 years analyzing and reporting on the results of consolidation of 95 percent of North Slope oil fields in the hands of three transnational oil giants who own a similar percentage of the trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). Since 2002, a slew of regulatory and court decisions have consistently confirmed one of my principal arguments: that the North Slope Big Three – BP, ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil – charged excessively high pipeline tariffs (shipping charges) on TAPS to reduce their rightful royalty and production tax payments to the state while overcharging their competitors.
Last summer, Governor Sarah Palin called a special session of the state Legislature to secure approval of an independent operator to build the proposed North Slope natural gas pipeline. Governor Palin says the main reason she wants an independent operator for the long-delayed natural gas pipeline is to achieve lower pipeline tariffs on that project. And during her first year in office, Governor Palin also called the Legislature into special session to increase the state share of revenue from its production tax with rising oil prices. Her tax team hired me to work on that proposal.
From the foregoing, it would seem that I have every reason to support Sarah Palin and recommend her for higher office.
But I don’t.
Based on the documented analysis I posted on my website (http://www.finebergresearch.com) Sept. 27, I feel compelled to oppose Governor Palin’s candidacy for national office. For case studies that call into question Governor Palin’s management of major oil and gas issues, please check out the facts and documents I have assembled and posted. My analysis identifies and documents:
• fundamental flaws and inconsistencies in the design of Governor Palin’s major oil and gas policy proposals;
• disappointing implementation failures;
• a strangely reclusive management style; and
• potential staff and consultant conflicts of interest within her administrative team that sully her image as a reformer.
The story line on my website is simple: The events I have documented and reported suggest that problems I first dismissed as anomalies in 2007 turned out, in fact, to be harbingers of dubious policy outcomes in 2008. In my estimation, Governor Palin is extremely adept at using public relations to mask problems that result from an apparent unwillingness or inability to roll up her sleeves and deal with the all-important nuts-and-bolts issues that are essential to good governance.
In sum: In the very field that Governor Palin has proffered as her primary credential for assuming the duties of high national office, her performance simply does not measure up to her rhetoric.
Richard A. Fineberg is an independent oil and gas analyst from Ester, Alaska. Over the past 35 years, he has observed Alaska oil and gas development as a newspaper reporter, as a consultant to various local, state and federal agencies as a senior oil and gas policy advisor to the governor of Alaska and as a web commentator.

Posted by: jag5cap | October 19, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I saw her in an scripted interview last night regarding Relgion – she might want to explain what she is doing practicing witchcraft in the you tube video. She acts like we are stupid everyone has seen this video. Are we ever going to get an answer on this. I am just curious – what was she doing there?
She really is out of touch with reality. I can understand how Alaska overlooks this, but the rest of the world is not that stupid.
Sarah Palin – John McCain’s new legacy

Posted by: whynot | October 21, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.