By Natalie Gewargis

Oct 16, 2008 10:33am

Joe the Plumber Eligible for Obama Tax Cut?

ABC News’ Chris Bury is outside Toledo, near the home of Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher, aka "Joe the Plumber," and reports that Wurzelbacher — such a key part of Sen. John McCain’s critique of Sen. Barack Obama’s economic proposals — acknowledged that he wants to purchase the plumbing business for $250-280,000, not that he would net that much in profits.

He would make much less, he said.

Which would seem to indicate that he would be eligible for an Obama tax cut, not that he would be subject to the tax increase from 36% to 39% Obama would impose on those making more than $200,000 per person, or $250,000 per family.

Wurzelbacher this morning told ABC News’ Diane Sawyer that he was talking about, in Diane’s words, the prospect, the hope that someday he would make $250,000.

"Well, exactly," he said. "Exactly. I mean, not that I don’t want to be taxed. You have to be taxed. But to — just because you work a little harder to have a little bit more money taken from you, I mean, that’s scary. You know, as opposed to other people. I worked hard for it. Why should I be taxed more than other people?"

Diane asked, "If those people should not be taxed additionally, even though they’re in the top 5% of America, what about people who make $1 million? Or $5 million?"

"Well, I mean, quite honestly, why should they be penalized for being successful?" Wurzelbacher asked. "I mean, that’s what you’re telling me. That’s what it sounds like you’re saying. That’s wrong. Because you’re successful, you have to pay more than everybody else? We all live in this country. It’s a basic right. And Obama wants to take that basic right and penalize me for it, is what it comes down to. That’s a very socialist view and it’s incredibly wrong. I mean, $250,000 now. What if he decides, well, you know, $150,000, you’re pretty rich, too. Let’s go ahead and lower it again. You know it’s a slippery slope. When’s it going to stop?"

- jpt

User Comments

If you watch the video of Obama’s neighborhood chat with Joe last weekend, you get the sense that Joe is really a flat tax advocate. He brings the issue up. Obama explains that while a flat tax sounds fair, it is actually regressive and hurts the middle income and poor people more than a progressive tax system penalizes the rich.

Posted by: ricky | October 16, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

too late for damage control.
Obama in his own words will “punish success” and “spread the wealth”.

Posted by: geevill | October 16, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Jake, the reality of this should be chased down more before the media makes this guy some kind of ‘hurt’ middle class. First, even if the guy were to make $275K, he would only pay about $1K more in income taxes. And now it looks like he might not even understand how taxes work. The media is going to have egg on the face if turns out this guy was really talking about his ‘purchase price’ for the business and not his potential earnings, and that he really is going to be a $80-100K earner where Obama’s plan will actually save him MORE in taxes.

Posted by: TJ | October 16, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Obama is wrong. he says no one likes to pay taxes… when the fact is, no one likes taxes, period. Barack Obama needs to quit acting as if Americans are okay with taxes, as long as it’s our neighbors paying it.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 16, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Joe the Plumber if you think you will Net 250,000 a year in a plumbing Business THE YOU ARE RIPPING PEOPLE OFF!

Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

So Joe the Plumber will actually do better under Obama’s plan?
That’s too funny!

Posted by: Jerry | October 16, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Well it seems that Obama has been uncovered for what he really wants to do, make this country a Socialist place to live! Joe the Plumber caught Obama with his pants down!

Posted by: chuck | October 16, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Republican = selfish

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 16, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

The poor have always been exploited by the rich in this country. It’s time for some payback. Quit your crying and pay up!

Posted by: Dylan | October 16, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

So according to Joe and Mccain Its ok to Tax the Hell out of the Middleclass say like people who make 20-200 Thousand a Year and Give it to the Rich so they can pocket Their Net?

Posted by: ANGIE | October 16, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Just what I thought yesterday when I heard Katie Couric interviewing the Joe Guy.
This man likes to brag. Okay, this story is falling flat on its face for the McCain campaign.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Let’s just take one example….The average baseball salary in 2005 was $2.5 million dollars. The average salary in 2008 is over $3 million. The average ticket price in 2006 was $22 a ticket. Today, it is $25.40. Add in $10 for parking and it costs me well over $100 to take my kids to a ballgame. And forget about the World Series where tickets quadruple in costs.
This is merely an illustration of what is going on today in the world. Millionaires and billionaires are making their money on the backs of the middle class chumps like us. Then they proclaim how hard they worked to get where they got. While I think that many of these folks owe as much to good fortune as hard work I have no problem with them making as much as they can.
But don’t cry to me about taxes. Pay your fair share. Right now, billionaires and millionaires are not…

Posted by: indy_voter | October 16, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Jake, it might be helpful for the MSM to do some fact checking on this Joe guy. I’ve been reading all sorts of things on other blogs this morning – everything from his not being a registered voter to having family ties to another Wurzelbacher who was involved with the Keating Five stuff to him already owning a couple of other businesses. I think there’s confusion due to not knowing where he really lives, and the name thing: Is his first name really Samuel and not Joe? No doubt cable news is already on it, but perhaps you might care to enlighten…thanks.

Posted by: Barbyrah | October 16, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

This guy is a Republican plant. He’s a registered Republican; his dad is a big time GOP donor. To top it off, he’s in the Keating circle!
Come on. This is just ridiculous.

Posted by: Tungsten | October 16, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Joe the plumber is a Republican plant. His brother Robert is a big Repub donor and the son in law of Charles Keating, of the McCain Keating Five.
Brother has given lots of $$$ to Republicans.

Posted by: whamo | October 16, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

TJ must have had problems in math class. A 39% tax on $275,000.00 is
$107,250.00, not $1,000.00. Do you do tax returns for a living? I do, and everyone will have “sticker shock” if Obama wins. I agree with Joe the Plumber.

Posted by: Smitty | October 16, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Joe sounds selfish.

Posted by: Adam | October 16, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Work America. Work! I need your tax dollars to support me.

Posted by: Lazy Bum | October 16, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Dylan, I don’t know where you’ve been living, but those people making 200 250k pay up, been there done that. The so called rich in O’s eyes aren’t rich. Once they finish taxing you, you are lucky to have enough to pay all your bills and eat a descent meal. You have to remember it isn’t just a federal tax, you are paying social security, state, property, etc. It gets ridiculous. Why should half of what we make go to fund the governments social programs. Charity comes from the heart, it shouldn’t come from the government, by way of my pocket.

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 16, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Joe the plumber is a joke that is backfiring on McCain.
If Joe the plumber can afford to buy a business that makes 250k or more, he can afford to pay higher taxes.
To think that he should be able to pay the same amount of taxes as the guy who only makes 25k a year… he is crazy.
Politico says that he is not even a registered voter.
Joe the plumber, you need to get your head out of the pipes and get real…
Just like McCain said… your rich, congradulations !! Now pay up

Posted by: lmg | October 16, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

How many of us can relate to Joe Plumber? Not many I wager. McCain’s Base perhaps.

Posted by: Thinking | October 16, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

This is a HUGE defeat for the Obama camp. They are spiraling out of control with ACORN, Ayers, the birth certificate video which has a million hits on U tube in just 3 days. People are beginning to wake up and see that Obama is not right for the country. I regret voting for him during the primary and won’t make the same mistake again.
Obama’s statement to the plumber was just plain STUPID and shows that he has ZERO experience to deal with anything. He lost my brother’s vote because if it.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

YOU SAID IT ALL JOE !
with Barack Obama IT’S A SOCIALIST WAY !
LOL !

Posted by: Hero | October 16, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Please stop criticizing my old buddy Joe Wurzelburger just because he can’t get his story straight.

Posted by: Rocky | October 16, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

How will Joe the Plant feed his family on $220,000 a year instead of $250,000? Think of the children!

Posted by: helloworld | October 16, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

“Obama explains that while a flat tax sounds fair, it is actually regressive and hurts the middle income and poor people more than a progressive tax system penalizes the rich.”
Unfortunately Obama’s explanation of a flat tax was flat out wrong. Forty percent? Give me a break. There are many, many studies that conclude a flat tax of around 15% for all wages above roughly $40,000 a year would be plenty to run our bloated federal government. Obviously less would be needed if we slashed services back to what is constitutionally required.
A flat tax would not punish the lower and middle classes, but it would remove power from lawmakers so it will never happen. A progressive tax does indeed punish success as you’ve pointed out, not necessarily “the rich”. But keep up the class warfare commentary. It’s straight out of the Saul Alinsky playbook.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

actually as a a small business owner myself I only made about 7,000 last year after expenses was roulghly 32,000.So after I pay 11,000 in taxes this year I only have a net of 22,ooo so Obama’s plan will help me for sure. To put it another way,It will take me ten years to earn what Joe the plumber will earn in one year. He’s not going to work any harder than I am…….he’s just in a more lucrative field. So he should pay more for the right to live in this country

Posted by: Doug S | October 16, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Plumber Joe is a very smart man. Obama wants to “spread the wealth around” but particularly so to those who don’t pay any taxes at all. In addition, he has a wealth (pun intended) of new programs he wants to enact. Simply soaking the rich won’t pay for it all, particularly in a down economy. He’ll have to increase taxes on every taxpayer in order to “help those behind them” as he’s vowed to do. Welfare will disappear to be replaced by “refundable tax credits”, stimulus packages, and increased government programs.
Any middle class taxpayer who is voting for Obama thinking they’re going to pay less taxes is being played for a fool. Obama’s already told you in plain English that he’s going back to the tax rates under Bill Clinton – where we all paid more.

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

it shows how stupid people are on this tax thing…
and concerned in OH
he gets a 1000 back.
stupid people brought us the last 8 years
and stupidity is trying for more.
this time vote smart
this time vote for smart
vote for Obama and Biden.

Posted by: dl | October 16, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Rest assured, the level will not be 250- if you give the liberals total control of the government, anyone who has a successful job will be paying more. HOld on to your wallets, kids.

Posted by: Obama is a comin for your money | October 16, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

According to salary.com, the average plumber makes less than $40,000

Posted by: james | October 16, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I noticed GMA showed a clip this morning but stopped short of Obama saying ….spread the wealth around…..or however he put it.

Posted by: Maria | October 16, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Dylan — “The poor have always been exploited by the rich in this country. It’s time for some payback. Quit your crying and pay up! ”
40% of Americans don’t pay any taxes. Most of the tax infrastructure is paid for by the top 5%. How much payback do you need? Bringing tax rate up to 39% (and is that with or in addition to letting Bush tax cuts expire), means that for the most successful/wealth generating citiznes, almost half of their income is going to the government and – through Obama’s tax credits programs – the rest of the country. Not including SSI/FICA/state taxes – which probably tip it into 50% or more.
HALF OF MY INCOME vs 0 of YOURS TELL ME HOW THAT’S FAIR?

Posted by: Pay | October 16, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Joe the plumber is obviously a McCain supporter. He said his in interview this morning that he’s made up his mind for “some time”. He also said “this is my 15 minutes”. That Andy Warhol. I don’t know too many plumbers that can quote Andy Warhol or even know who he is. Also, McCain seemed to know an awful lot about a guy who the world only knows from a brief encounter with Obama on a rope line a few days ago. I’m starting to think the RNC got to this guy beforehand. I think they tried to put a “face” on their argument. Maybe the jounralists should investigate this guy.

Posted by: DTP | October 16, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

The extremist Republicans with media conglomerates will drive the country to socialism not the democrats. It is a ridiculous argument.
Joe was a Republican plant.
Americans are commiting suicide because of the economic crisis and the Republicans are producing plays to entertain the low information worker.
Charles Keating ring any bells?
Enough theater.
Over 150 years of free education for all and we still as a nation are divided…half are wise, tolerant, honest, and value education in our elected officials and half are not.
Racism is rearing its ugly head…I thought we were beyond that…
Flat tax is a good idea.
Obama 08

Posted by: mamabear | October 16, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I am sick of corporate fat-cats and big oil CEOs whining about paying more taxes. These robber-barons make millions. Why shouldn’t they make more than the average American? Why should the guy making $50,000 pay the same as these rip-off artists? “Spread the wealth around” merely means a more fair tax policy. Get real, geevil and the other desperate McCan’t/Failin supporters.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

As I understood Joe, he isn’t interested only in his own tax rate. He said in an interview that he is concerned about the idea of spreading the wealth in general. He doesn’t think anybody should be punished for making more money.
It wasn’t just about *him*.

Posted by: MayBee | October 16, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

I just read on another site that JOE THE PLUMBER ISN’T EVEN REGISTERED TO VOTE.
Can someone confirm this?

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | October 16, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Obama is wrong. he says no one likes to pay taxes… when the fact is, no one likes taxes, period. Barack Obama needs to quit acting as if Americans are okay with taxes, as long as it’s our neighbors paying it.
Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain |
*******************************************
Speak for yourself. Millions of we Americans are proud to support our country and invest in our counties infrastructure and for future generations through the taxes we pay.
We are against the distribution of wealth that has been going on where, through our taxes, the wealthy are pocketing all they can at the expense of the back bone of this country, the middle class.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 16, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

There’s no denying that Obama is quoted as saying to Joe the plumber,
“My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
Obama is no longer hiding his ideology of redistribution of wealth at the hands of the government. This quote is frighteningly similar to,
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx, 1875

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

ConcernedinOH: you need to study the issues more closely. You and your fellow Ohioans put Bush over the top four years ago. Thanks for Nothing!

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

and lets be clear
the top 5 % income has soaked this country for 40 years
as we watched the middle class ration tax burden increase at twice the rate over those last 40 years…
of a predominantly republican “finger pointing accusing everyone else of being socialist” run congress during that time…
time to stop this spin about “redistribution of wealth”
redistribution of responsibility for the opportunities that this country affords those who received those top 5 % of riches…was what the last 40 years of tax exemptions (you know what Buffett termed “green stamps for the rich” …increasing for the wealthy
is what is “redistribtuion” just in the opposite direction for 40 years…
Obama is only slightly correcting that shift.
and people like Joe Plumber don’t get that…
again
stupid people brought us Bush
Stupid people are many of those arguing for a continuation.

Posted by: dl | October 16, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Maria, you are so right. The media is in the tank for Obama but most people saw the full interview on U tube along with the October Surprise videos.
Now ABC and other Obama media fleas are trying to discredit Joe the Plumber when all Joe did was say that he was not buying Obama’s bull. Joe asked a question and Obama gave a stupid answer. what else can his media toilet warmers do except leave out the part of the story that Makes Obama look like the socialism peddling fool that he is.
The Obamabots are not democrats. That is why I harbor no feelings of self guilt by being a democrat who is voting for Mccain.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Can’t wait for obama to win. all you idiots who voted for him will be standing there with your hands out waiting for your hand out. can’t wait! he will laugh at you and say sorry…no money for you! he has promised money to EVERYONE. he is running for panderer in chief…liar liar pants on fire. i can’t wait to see your faces when he turns our country into a socialist experiment…he and michelle can’t wait to STICK IT TO YOU!!!! i can’t wait.
idiots.

Posted by: Jackie | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

“Joe the plumber is a Republican plant. His brother Robert is a big Repub donor and the son in law of Charles Keating, of the McCain Keating Five.
Brother has given lots of $$$ to Republicans.”
OMG, This story is getting sleazier by the minute for the McCain campaign.
So they setup this phony guy few days before the debate, so that McCain can have a person to hang his story on.
McCain, any respect which I had for you it lost. I don’t like to be manipulated…

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Joe the plumber is a relative of Charles Keating. Remember John Mccain and the Keating 5 and the Savings and Loan scandal, where the biggest heist in AMerican history was perpertrated on the American people.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

This guy sounds like a Republican plant. He has too many specific Republican talking points to be an ordinary common man. You should vet this guy immediately.

Posted by: Cynthia | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Yes, we have spread the wealth indeed. The republicans platform has always been unfair taxes. Reward the rich at the expense of the middle class. Give billions of tax cuts to the wealthy and then bail them out with 700 billion dollars..
NO MIDDLE CLASS. NO AMERICA..

Posted by: james | October 16, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Too funny. This McCain plant would actually get a tax cut under Obama. All of the right wing lunatics will eat him up. The other 95% of Americans aren’t buying the Joe “future millionaire” garbage. He’s the last trick for a candidate who has already lost the election.

Posted by: Joe | October 16, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

The comment about “spreading the wealth around” was in reference to TAX POLICY, people! You have to understand it in context. Obama is talking about a tax policy that is more fair. To make the leap of logic that his comment means socialism is ludicrous!

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Amazing the amount of people who think they are entitled to a free hand out! Get off your butts and earn your own money, if your field doesn’t make as much as the other guys, get a new field. Take responsibilty for your own life and quit expecting everyone else to pay your way. The world doesn’t OWE you a living and neither do I.

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 16, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

A simple flat tax — same percentage for all – with NO deductions would simplify things and make it fair to all. the problem? First & foremost, the very wealthy would wind up paying far more if they couldn’t use all their tax write-offs. but what would it do to the U.S. economy overall — would the loss of all those IRS jobs create an problem for workers or would it be a boon to the budget?

Posted by: Anna | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Joe forgot the $3000 per employee he would get which would make his taxes far lower than mccain,,,,
but he was for mccain since the beginnign and doesnt want to know the truth…

Posted by: Brian | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

If Joe the Plumber thinks he can’t afford to buy the business under Obama’s tax plan then he really needs to consult a good accountant. Obama’s plan lowers taxes on the first $250,000 Joe makes. On the money over $250,000, Joe would pay 39% under Obama, instead of the 36% he now pays. That’s 3% more taxes, not exactly a break-the-bank if you have already made $250,000 at a low rate. Plus, Obama will give him a tax credit for every job he creates, and tax credits for every employee that he provides health insurance for. Under Obama’s plan, Joe’s business will pay LESS TAX than it does now.
McCain’s plan will tax the first $250,000 at a higher rate, then drop the taxes on anything over $250,000 by an unspecified amount. McCain’s plan does not give him a tax credit for every job he creates. If he provides health care for his employees he will now have to deduct yet another tax from their paychecks, adding administrative burden to his company. Not to mention that Joe will have to pay this tax himself on his personal income, which amounts to $4,200 a year he pays in taxes (35% of the $12,000 a typical policy costs). And if his company does not provide health care, he and his employees will pay out of pocket for their health care (average cost $12,000 per year), get a $5,000 tax credit under McCain, but be out of pocket at least $7,000 per year for their policy.
My impression is that Joe really should stick to plumbing and leave tax policy to Obama.
Furthermore, Joe the plumber says that Obama has a “very socialist view of taxes” This statement shows America how very uninformed Joe Wurzelbacher is. I would love to hear Joe define socialism and describe the tax policies of a socialist nation. He would start to sound like Sarah Palin on Katie Couric. Nor does he seem to recognize that all democracies socialize certain functions: police, fire fighting, military, roads, public schools, sewers, water. This is for the greater good and we all accept it. It does not make us socialists.
In his book Audacity of Hope, Obama writes at length about the FAILURE of SOCIALISM. He enthusiastically states that American democracy is the greatest political system on earth. Obama is not a socialist, and he does not admire socialism.
Joe the plumber should stick to plumbing and leave public policy decisions to people who actually know what they are talking about.

Posted by: Nins | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Judged by the comments of those people who do not like Sen. Obama’s tax plan above, they must like Bush’s tax policy BTW which is McCain’s as well.
Obama 08!

Posted by: leighg1 | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Here’s what Joe said in an interview with Family Security:
W: There’s a lot of things I wish McCain would say. As far as this, yes, I would like him to speak. ***Not so much about small businesses, but just people in general that make this money.*** It’s not up to them to help America, I mean – let me rephrase that. It’s not – they shouldn’t be taxed more because they’ve succeeded. T
——
As you see, Joe is not just talking about himself. Shocking to some, perhaps, but he seems concerned about tax fairness for people who may be making more than he is right now.

Posted by: MayBee | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Blue in Michigan as most Obamabots is attempting to discredit anyone that they feel is a threat to Obama. I don’t care if Joe can’t vote because he is a felon. Joe had the right to ask Obama the question. Obama gave a stupid answer. Since Joe is in Ohio, with the help of Obama’s ACORN death squad, Joe the plumber may be registered 100 times and not even know it. I am sure his voter’s registration cards will end up in somebody’s hands thanks to Obama mutant Ninja truth squad ACORN.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

The 700 Billion dollars given to Wall Street wasn’t a form of Socialism? With that huge handout, the Class War just went nuclear. Now the Middle Class wants a cut.

Posted by: helloworld | October 16, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

So let me get this straight…
We should have a complete investigation of Joe the Plumber because Obama got “tricked” into saying he wants to “spread the wealth around”?
How about a complete investigation of Obama and Ayers and how they dispersed all that Annenberg Challenge money and who got all those Woods Funds grants?
How about a complete investigation of Obama campaigning for Oidinga in Africa?
How about a complete investigation of why Obama doesn’t simply release his birth certificate rather than he and the DNC tying up the courts in Pennsylvania?
How about a complete investigation into which Sundays he was sitting in Rev. Wright’s church and which sermons he was exposed to?
How about a complete investigation into why Farrakhan thinks the “messiah” is such a great guy?
And most of all, how about a complete investigation into why every time any criticism or question is raised about Obama, the one who dares to question is branded a racist?

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Hasn’t Obama been saying that those who make less than 250,000 will not see a tax “increase” and some won’t pay any at all? No increase means you will pay at the current rate and then when Bush’s cuts expire, won’t it increase?

Posted by: Maria | October 16, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

OK…
I had few minutes to think about it. All the questions Joe asked, the attacks McCain made. All the pieces fit together.
This is another sleazy scheme that Rick Davis have been working on for weeks.
We are being manipulated, bamboozled again.. I spit on these tactics.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Why cant Mccain ever say the term MIDDLECLASS? In the debates in his speeches never has he used that term Maybe a Man thats worth 100 Million Dollars, owns 7 houses and 13 cars cant say Middleclass Because he Doesnt know what its like to live with in his means you know like Pay check to Pay check!

Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

We should repeal the income tax act and take the money back from Congress that would solve all the problems. Let Congress tax the States just enough to run just the Country.Take the power away from Congress and give it back to the States where it belongs, that’s what we fought a civil war over, it’s to bad we lost, this is what we get.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | October 16, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

The Obamabots are on Kool Aid Mountain making a voo doo doll of Joe the Plumber to go with the rest of their collection. Hillary is a fool because they have a doll of her as well. They are just going to dust her off and start sticking pins into it after Obama gets elected.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Smitty, I think you’re the one who needs a math lesson. Or better yet, an english lesson. TJ said $1,000.00 MORE. Than the current rate, which would be 36%. Obama’s proposal to raise it to 39% would be 3% extra. 3% of $275,000.00 is $8,750, which, although not TJ’s assertion of $1,000, isn’t too significant for someone making that much money.
Stop your fear-mongering and stop protecting those who have money. I make a bit less than $250,000 and under McCain’s policy, I would pay MORE taxes than someone making more than me. That’s absolutely absurd.

Posted by: tim | October 16, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

There is a reason this guy is a plumber and not say a rocket scientist.
Most of america doesn’t relate to anyone who makes more then 100,000 so this guy who will make 250,000 can cry himself to sleep with all his money.
And a plumber??? are you kidding me, the clock starts as soon as they pick up the phone, hire a plumber any time of the day, especially at night, and tell me that guy is having a rough time making ends meet when you get his bill.
What a jerk.

Posted by: make it known | October 16, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I can’t stand it in campaigns when a candidate picks some ‘average joe’ and then tries to shove every working class American into the same catagory. Poor Joe is just being used as a Republican prop and media destraction.

Posted by: freedomfighter1975 | October 16, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Did anyone catch Mccain in the debate admitting to the fact He wants to TAX our Health Insurance that is provided to us from our Employers, so what like its Income but He doesnt want to Tax a person netting a Quater of A Million dollars a year Get outta here old man!

Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Did anyone catch Mccain in the debate admitting to the fact He wants to TAX our Health Insurance that is provided to us from our Employers, so what like its Income but He doesnt want to Tax a person netting a Quater of A Million dollars a year Get outta here old man!

Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Truth Matters says:
“We are against the distribution of wealth that has been going on where, through our taxes, the wealthy are pocketing all they can at the expense of the back bone of this country, the middle class.”
Do you believe you should keep what you earn? Who can better provide for your family, you or a beaurocrat? If you’re thrilled to pay your taxes there are no laws preventing you from overpaying. The IRS will gladly accept your donations.
It’s well known the “wealthy”, you know, those evil neer-do-wells who lounge about all day spending their inheritence, pay the overwhelming majority of taxes in this country. American businesses have the highest combined corporate tax rate among the 30 OECD countries. Why are you so insistent on punishing the economic engine of our nation? I don’t get it.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

JOE THE PLUMBER said he would tell everyone who he voted for the Wednesday after the election.
REPORTS ARE THAT HE IS NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE.
Just asking if that’s been confirmed.

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | October 16, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

From the Bot Dictionary:
“Wealthy”: The guy in the tax bracket above yours.

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Good point angie, he tried to slide that one by.
Someone else said this, so forgive me if i get it wrong.
Middle class tax break= socialism?
Upper class tax break= trickle down?
How does that work?
I get it it’s not socialism for upper class, because there are so few of them. Got it, the 95% rest of us can go live squalor so Johhny boy can one-up his old man.

Posted by: make it known | October 16, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

As an independent and a physics prof, it’s easy to catch mistakes or distortions people make to support they’re sides:
Jake-”…he would be subject to the tax increase from 36% to 39% Obama would impose…”
TJ- “…even if the guy were to make $275k, he would only pay about $1k more in income taxes.”
Smitty- “A 39% tax on $275,000.00 is
$107,250.00, not $1,000.00. Do you do tax returns for a living? I do…”
Me-
$275K*(0.39-0.36) = $8250!!!
(i) TJ under-calculated the amount by almost a factor of 10.
(ii) Smitty mis-read TJ’s post and used the overall tax (rather than the DIFFERENCE) to invoke “sticker shock”, even though the number at a 36% rate is $99K which presumably would also warrant “sticker shock”.
Conclusions:
(a) TJ exaggerated
(b) Smitty lacks attention to detail (and made personal attacks)
(c) Smitty’s lack of attention to detail indicates that you might not want him to do your tax returns

Posted by: mathman | October 16, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

********** jpt ********************
Question thats on my mind is why is Joe Wurzelbacher (Joe the Plumber) not registered to vote in Ohio ?
HMMM ?
Member of the NRA but not registered to vote ?? (In Ohio at least)
Strange…..
A little help ???

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Media continues to show its ignorance.
To wit, Joe the Plumber was talking to ObamACORN about his possibly taking over the business he works for and employing a few workers. Thereby punishing Joe the Plumber for his success.
ObamACORN (D-ACORN) wants to “spread your success around” to “those behind you”, so did Karl Marx.

Posted by: Captain America | October 16, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Wake up America!
We need a change. So far the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer. McCain and Palin are not giving information on how they are going to deal specifically with any situation. They are manipulating the ignorant with their motto “country first” and words like “patriotic” (his country and his patriotism are in his/their wallet)

Posted by: lahiker | October 16, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

right, we want small business to aim for low incomes…
geez, this column is assinine

Posted by: trettione | October 16, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Samuel Joseph Wurzelmacher owes the State of Ohio $1,182.98 in unpaid income taxes, according to Lucas County court records (see Case No. G-4801-LN-200701803). Pay your current taxes, first, Joe.

Posted by: AnotherBuckeye | October 16, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

American businesses have the highest combined corporate tax rate among the 30 OECD countries. Why are you so insistent on punishing the economic engine of our nation? I don’t get it.
————————-
Obviously not.
The average tax paid by the Fortune 500 was LESS than 18% last year.
Yes, the tax rate schedule says they SHOULD be paying 35%, but they don’t. THAT’S the problem. Pubs have instituted rules that allow the rich to avoid paying their share of taxes.
I pay more as a percentage of my income than the multi-million dollar companies! It is not right for wealthy corporations to ride on the backs of their middle class workers.

Posted by: Answer to Your Question | October 16, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Joe seems to me you are looking for a hand out, I am a small business owner and I agree with Obama tax and health plan. We all have to pay taxes to maintain schools,roads, bridges etc. I believe you should educate yourself on business before you buy on because it seems to me your don’t know what you are talking about.

Posted by: Randy | October 16, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

3 words to sum it up: Kall Rove Tactics.
Joe the Plumber is the most prefect example of the whole John McCaig campaign style!
Yesterday during an interview with this guy I already thought there is something fishy with this guy.
This guy is a republican plant, a setup. It’s one big major BS story.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Some of us make more than others. Most of the time, however, this isn’t because of some ‘silver spoon’ syndrome. It’s because we didn’t have indescriminate sex and unplanned babies out of wedlock, because we sacrificed to get an education, because we got up every morning and went to work, took on more responsibility, because we did a lot towards fostering our careers and our lives (rather than some others who just sit around whining about how hard their lives are while they party three nights a week). I worked harder than most and now Obama thinks because I worked so hard, that I owe these slackers working as waitresses and juggling 4 kids that they can’t feed? I owe you nothing. Share the wealth, indeed!
Rich people are not the bad guys. Rich people are the ones hiring, providing jobs and a way to get health insurance. Tax them more and they will take their companies elsewhere as well as the jobs. Where in this country did we get the idea that rich people are bad because they’re rich? They are already paying most of the tax base. They enable you poor slobs to get sick and be treated for free, provide donations to the food banks that are feeding the poor, to the Red Cross, to all the welfare programs, etc. Keep taxing them, tax them to death and watch this country’s prosperity dry up. And yours and mine with it. As for me – I’m voting AGAINST Obama and pray to God he doesn’t win.

Posted by: cht | October 16, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

It looks doubtful that President Obama will ask Joe to fix the toilets at the White House.

Posted by: Gus | October 16, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Here’s the problem…people who are in the top 5% or whatever DON’T PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES ANYWAY!!! They either hide it in offshore accounts or in their childrens accounts or in various other ways, or they take advantage of all the current loopholes in the tax system now and even can manipulate it in such ways that they CLAIM A LOSS YEAR AFTER YEAR!!! Even though they live in million dollar homes! I know several people that live like that and quite frankly it sickens me. They are the reason our taxes go up or our social security program is declining. Between that and hiring illegal aliens for nickels on the dollar…this is why our taxes are going up!!! THE TOP 5% DON’T PAY THEIR SHARE!!! THEY ARE TOO BUSY WORKING THE SYSTEM CLAIMING LOSSES WHILE THEY LIVE IN MILLION DOLLAR HOMES AND DRIVE 3 SUV’S!!! I say YES! Tax the 5%’ers…they’ll just find another way to cheat the system and cheat Americans! Republicans are the real domestic terrorists!!

Posted by: Independent Fighter | October 16, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Poor Joe is already being labeled “loser”, “racist” by the MSM. He fits that neo-nazi look, yet he spoke for me. I am far from rich, just comfortable for a family of 4, but we fall into the “Obama Rich” bracket. Thank you Joe, you spoke for me. It is totally absurd that I spent so many years in college and 60 hour work weeks for 20 years to get to where I am and learn that I have to pay more taxes so that someone else can go buy something nice? My parents taught me as I teach my children, you want something nice, work hard and earn it, don’t expect it.

Posted by: Gene | October 16, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

********** jpt ********************
Joe the Plumber, the star of tonight’s debate, may have a very interesting connection to John McCain. In fact, Joe the Plumber (Joe Wurzelbacher) of Cincinnati, Ohio may be related to one Robert Wurzelbacher of Cincinnati, Ohio, who happens to be Charles Keating’s son-in-law. ???????????
JPT CAN YOU FIND OUT IS THIS TRUE

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Oh, I get it now.
Anyone who comes on camera disagreeing with Obama is a “plant.”
What is it with shrubbery?
Obama – McCain is just like BUSH
Obamabots – McCain defenders are PLANTS

Posted by: SandyB | October 16, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Smitty,
In your attempt to try to scare people with “sticker shock”, you forgot to mention that right now the tax rate for over $275K is 36%, which is $99K in taxes. Without taking into consideration any deductions someone making that amount of money will write off.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Awwww, those poor rich people.
They get to run the company in the ground and leave with ONLY $40 million dollars while the rest of the employees get laid off.
And then, after they run their big banks in the ground, they get to take $700 billion taxpayer dollars to help them cover up for their “mistakes/crimes”.
Poor babies.
Such a pity.
It’s not fair.
LET THEM EAT CAKE!

Posted by: Nobodys fool | October 16, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Joe the Plumber is really a guy named Sam. He’s not a Joe. On top of that – he’s a registered Republican and not an independent voter that hasn’t decided. This guy is a major fraud who is using this moment so he can make some quick cash in GOP ads to buy his company.
If you make more money – you get taxed more. it’s been that way forever.

Posted by: Augie | October 16, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Why do Pubs have a problem with corporations paying their share of the burden in America?
Ronald Reagan RAISED corporate taxes. Is he not the quintessential Republican for you guys?
And screw Joe the, I’ll complain but I didn’t register to vote, plumber. Any plumber making over $250/k per year is not going to get sympathy from me. More power to him, but there are families in this nation that need tax relief just to pay their bills.
Tell “Maverick” anyone making a quarter million per year is not exactly suffering by most people’s standards.
But when you have 7 houses and 13 cars, had a sliver spoon your whole life, and you’re married to an heiress, I can see where you would be out of touch with 90% of America.

Posted by: Part of the disappearing "middle" class | October 16, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Woody,
If you would listen to all of the conversation instead of cherry picking parts, Obama said some say the flat rate would be around 20%, but that would mean there would need to be higher state and sales taxes to make up for the difference.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I don’t get it. So he’s complaining about having to pay more taxes if one day he’s successful and able to net $250,000 in income but right now he’s not making that. Did this guy graduate high school? Was this guy born yesterday? Does he really think with an 11 trillion dollar deficit the tax payers are not gonna have to pay the piper. Does he really think that the capital gains tax benefits him?

Posted by: dman | October 16, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

the blogs this morning are on a witch hunt for joe the plumber in an effort to discredit him. that is truly pathetic. this is a sign of what is to come as obama implements class warfare. it will be brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor. pretty soon you will be getting a reward from the obama truth squads for turning in your own mother.

Posted by: northernlights | October 16, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

tell joe the plummer that i will gladly trade my money and my tax bracket for his. I didn’t think so, joe.

Posted by: philafan | October 16, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

SandyB – The reason we know that “Joe” was a plant is not because he disagrees with Obama.
We know he’s a plant because McCain knew all about him, down to the spelling of his last name, and what he and Obama talked about in a rope line. Unless McCain (or a republican operative was there), McCain would not have had this first-hand information.
Add to that, McCain kicking off the debate with the well-rehearsed “Joe”.
We’ve seen Karl Rove’s tactics a hundred times, and we can smell them now from a mile away.

Posted by: clifton | October 16, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Ok..
Joe, the Pluber = Sam, the Fraud
a.k.a Sam, the Liar
Sam, the Republican Plant
Sam, in debt of Ohio
Sam, the return of the Keaton’s

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Ok… slippery slope… humm… he’s got talking points. First we find out that he is REALTED to Charles Keating (of the famous Keating 5) and now he has GOP talking points… coincidence?
Makes me angry. Socialists? Hummm… Haven’t I heard that before in the McCain rally’s? that Joe will NEVER make 250,000.

Posted by: Independant American Woman | October 16, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

HA HAHAHAAA HAH A!!! HAHAH AH!!HA AH!!!
HA HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
“Joe The Plumber, aka Joe Wurzelbacher, the Toledo plumber who became the hot topic of the last Presidential debate due to his rope-line confrontation with Barack Obama’s over the Democratic candidate’s tax plan, may not be a plumber, and may not be planning to buy a plumbing business where he will be netting $250,000 a year.
He isn’t in the Toledo Yellow Pages, he isn’t registered to vote and it’s more likely that his existence as a plumber buying a $250K business is as sincere as Sarah Palin asking Joe Biden if she can call him “Joe.”
Isn’t it interesting that Joe is buying a business that is making a profit of exactly $250K, the Obama tax break minimum. If we’re talking a business that is bottom lining at $250K, a standard business acquisition falls into the 4 to 1 investment area, which would call for Joe
is buying a business that is making a profit of exactly $250K, the Obama tax break minimum. A normal business acquisition falls into the 4 to 1 investment area, which would call for Joe to come up with $1,000,000 to purchase his $250K business. If that plumbing business had assets like trucks, equipment and offices, the cost could be far more.
Add to that Wurzelbacher doesn’t appear in the Toledo Yellow Pages listings, yet has been able to put together at least a million to invest, especially in these dire economic times, you begin to wonder whether Joe is a plumber or did someone in the McCain campaign find him in central casting?”

Posted by: clifton | October 16, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Aha, Mr mathman
Exactly what I was trying to show, people are not paying attention to the details in Obama’s plan. Congrats on that, but it will be “sticker-shock” because from what I have read, the amount taxed is the GROSS amount. That is the amount before a small business pays any expenses such as supplies, payroll etc….
And regardless of how the taxes are minimized by the media, 39% is still a large amount to pay.
As for the personal attack, that would be all about you, I was just curious about TJ’s profession.

Posted by: Smitty | October 16, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Wurzelbacher compared Obama to Sammy Davis Jr. in an interview with Katie Couric.

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Talking about the Small Business owners Mack, not the Individual returns. Obama is going to tax the GROSS, not the net.

Posted by: Smitty | October 16, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Joe the plumber is my hero! Get him!

Posted by: chris | October 16, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

“Parents are going to have to show more responsibility. They’ve got to turn off the TV set, put away the video games…” – Barack Obama.
******
Obama Campaign Ads Popping Up In Video Game Billboards
InformationWeek, NY – 19 hours ago
The ads appear in racing games including “Burnout Paradise” and “NASCAR 09,” as well as “NHL 09,” “NBA Live 08,” “Need For Speed,” “NFL Tour,” and “Skate. …

Posted by: OxyCon | October 16, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Now the Obots are saying that Joe is bald scary racist.
Obama’s biggest challenge his separating himself from his fanatical salivating supporters. They are not democrats and have hijacked the DNC. I am voting for Mccain because in this race he is the best person for the job and the DNC needs to throw out the impostors aka Obamabot.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I can pretty much guarantee that Joe works harder than the people complaining about him here. He’s also going to be providing more jobs than anyone posting here. We should be encouraging people to become successful. They are the ones providing jobs in this country, whether you folks want to admit it or not. I wonder how many people here work for someone who isn’t wealthy.

Posted by: johnjohn | October 16, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Serious…
Now this story is getting out… McCain is really losing his marbles.
It’s so lame…
If you pick a stand up guy, do some vetting. His pick for Joe, or Sam is almost as bad as the Palin pick.
This story is getting to uglier and uglier, makes my day to see old McCain really lost it this time!

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

To clifton,
My plumber doesn’t appear in the yellow pages either. You know why? He works for a commercial plumber and does small jobs for homes on the side. It’s not that uncommon. He want’s to buy a business. Why would you expect Joe’s name to be in the Yellow Pages if he works for someone else?
Keep up the conspiracy theories, they’re fun to read. They are however a distraction to the real point: Obama let slip his true ideology of redistributing the wealth, just like Karl Marx.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

bah, your post is very astute, though surely unintentionally so. You can rest assured that many will choose to work less and hire less too. Many more will choose to ship jobs overseas where it’s a lot cheaper to do business, plus the labor is much cheaper too.
How can the government afford to increase programs and give tax cuts when the tax revenue they collect continues to fall?

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

There is nothing Marxist about Obama’s plan’s.
We are going back to the tax-rate situation under the Clinton years. Seems fair to me…

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

$250,000 refers to net income not gross revenue.
A 3% increase in the maximum tax bracket will not change lifestyles.
One way for a small businesse to reduce tax liablity is to hire people.
The more people working the better.
A tax cut for the middle class we’ll increase consumer spending. Which will help business owners. The Dow is tanking again because of declining consumer spending.
Some people that will pay more include
the former head of Lehman brothers would walk away with $350 million.
and the former head of Washington Mutual, who walked away with $17 million after only 17 days on the job.
They names should be more famous than Joe the Plumber.
Quick what is 3% of 350 million.

Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | October 16, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Mack says:
“Woody,
If you would listen to all of the conversation instead of cherry picking parts, Obama said some say the flat rate would be around 20%, but that would mean there would need to be higher state and sales taxes to make up for the difference.”
I did listen and it sounded to me like he said 40. If it’s 20, I stand corrected but it’s still too high. Don’t take my word for it, take Steve Forbes’. And no, we don’t need higher state and sales taxes to “make up the difference”. Make up what difference? Last time I checked my federal taxes don’t go to states and cities. And if 15% of our national income is not enough to run our government, how about CUTTING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNMENT! Ever think of that?

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I thought the exchange between Obama and Joe Wurzelbacher was great because it showed two decent men with fundamentally different views on taxes having a respectful conversation. That’s how an election is supposed to be. I agree with Obama, but I respect Joe just the same.
And what a nice change this is from the “Obama is s-ca-r-y” nonsense coming out of the McCain camp lately.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 16, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Yes, everyone should have to pay taxes for using roads and bridges and the like, but at least 40% don’t pay anything even though they use the roads and bridges and everything else just like the rest of us, now we are being asked to pay for health care, food, shopping, a college education etc. for those who pay nothing and aren’t likely to ever become a tax payer no matter how much we help them because why would they? If they can get everything for free why change?

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | October 16, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

bah – how simplistic – don’t want to pay more in taxes, so work less?
Maybe that works when you live w/your parents or are in school, but what about when you have a family, mortgage, car payments, saving for college, saving for retirement? … or should everyone work less, take a freeking vacation, and end up relying on the government of the moment?
Get a grip, get a job – maybe then you’ll get a life you appreciate, and a family you want to sustain.

Posted by: nobah | October 16, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

How was it that a newspaper was present when Joe was watching the debates if Joe didn’t know his name would be mentioned? See pic Ohio news paper!
Why was Joe (“Joe Six Pack”) already booked to do Fox News show Huckabee before the debates ?

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Thanks, Jake, for asking the one pertinent question in this Joe Plumber phenomenon. He has a right to his opinions, but he is not germane to the points McCain was making last night.

Posted by: Mike | October 16, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Independent Fighter says:
“Here’s the problem…people who are in the top 5% or whatever DON’T PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE OF TAXES ANYWAY!!! They either hide it in offshore accounts or in their childrens accounts or in various other ways, or they take advantage of all the current loopholes in the tax system now and even can manipulate it in such ways that they CLAIM A LOSS YEAR AFTER YEAR …”
and the rant continues.
Unfortunately none of this is backed up by the facts. According to the Tax Foundation for calendar year 2006 the top 5% of wage earners paid, yes actual PAID, 36.84% of all federal income taxes collecte. Repeat, PAID. After all supposed loopholes and tax dodges have been exercises. PAID.
But hey, don’t let facts get in the way of your religious argument. Keep blaming everyone else for your shortcomings if it makes you feel better.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

mary lou. you are a simpleton so i will spell it out for you.
business who attempt to do the anti american things you mentioned in your post are free to do that.
after the liberals get control of this country ,new laws will be QUICKLY put in place that are RETROACTIVE as well and will begin to penalize companies who did already move overseas. many of them will return here, with the jobs they took because it wont be cost effective anymore. we ,the liberals will forthwith (after we get control of the government )heavily PENALIZE businesses that act like that ,with BIG $$$ fines and taxes .
in other words ,the things you mentioned,jobs going over seas, businesses firing to protect profits ,etc …well that kind of corporate behavior will quickly become a thing of the past.
the new liberal government will SPANK businesses with big taxes/fines when they move overseas ,freezing assests and funds .
the new liberal government will also put import tariffs in place so that any companies who DO leave and try to import their goods back here will pay 500% tariff at least.
see? all those things you mentioned MIGHT have happened with someone else running the government , but we liberals already know the selfish unpatriotic republican playbook by heart ,and we have the plan(and the political power,well after inauguration day anyway) to put all you republicans right where you need to be ,whether you agree or not…

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

CLabs says:
“There is nothing Marxist about Obama’s plan’s.
We are going back to the tax-rate situation under the Clinton years. Seems fair to me…”
Really? I don’t remember upwards of 30 million tax filers during the Clinton years paying NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX yet RECEIVING A CHECK FROM THE IRS. That’s exactly what will happen under Obama’s plan. Of course Obama doesn’t tell you that, all is tells you is 95% of “working families” will get not pay any more taxes than today. But, 32% of American income tax filers (60 million people) pay no federal income tax today. Roughly have of those non-payers will indeed receive a “tax break” in the form of a check from the IRS. That’s my money and your money going straight to someone else. Welfare via the IRS.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Joe the Plumber has had quite a ride but I think he is a plant by the McCain campaign. He has already given interviews to conservative magazines, he is making the round of the morning shows. The fact is, his question to Obama wasn’t a question at all. Joe had already made up his mind that Obama’s plan is unfair and smacks of “socialism,” another Republican buzzword. This guy, he is not real.

Posted by: steve | October 16, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

bah
If any company faces the kinds of things you mentioned they will just close their doors, period. What alternative universe are you from?

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | October 16, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Joe-the-Plumber (who by the way. is from my home-state and home-area, needs to take a lesson from my brother Gene-the-Plumber, who’s small plumbing company is experiencing a 60% decrease in business. Why? Because Mike-and-Michelle-Middle-Class cannot afford to build a house, buy a house, or even call the plumber. You can “say it ain’t so, Joe” — but reality is: that’s what happens when the middle-class has no money. An ugly fact of life: poverty tends to trickle up.

Posted by: Alexandra | October 16, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Watch for a send-up of Joe the Plumber and McCain on the next SNL, which is where they both belong. Let’s not shed any tears over Joe and his higher taxes. He’ll be sitting pretty throughout the recession. Hiring a plumber isn’t a discretionary expenditure. If you need one, you’ll hire one regardless of what the economy’s doing. And for all his whining about being penalized for trying to reach the American Dream, Joe’s no poster boy for those who are trying to do the same. Appearing on a talk show this morning, Joe said that when he asked Obama about his taxes, Obama “tap danced” around the issue “like Sammy Davis Jr.” Apparently he thinks an African-American who aspires to the office of the presidency is as laughable as a dancing ape. He may not even be aware that his remark was racist, which is the most frightening part of this sorry episode.

Posted by: jill | October 16, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

No matter where you stand, the policy of the past 8 years has caused completel disaster and it needs to be reveresed. Obama wants to reverse it. scream “socialism” all you want. the 95% of Americans that are hurting would love some wealth spread around. And to all you Christian republicans crying your eyes out, wouldn’t Jesus wanted us to help the less fortunate?

Posted by: Karl Marx has left the building | October 16, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

the only people who need to work less are the ones making more than $250k per year and are complaining that they have to pay too much in taxes.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!
sorry but i dont feel sorry for those people one itty bitty bit. they are REALLY lucky that i am not going to be president. you would be praying for obama if that ever happened.
isnt that simple? keep making it more complicated than it is though ,thats what b/s and smoke and mirrors were invented for…republican patented too!

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Joe Wurzelbacher doesn’t immediately turn up in the Ohio voter registration database, leading to some speculation last night that he’s not registered to vote.
But the Toledo Blade reports that he appears to be a registered Republican, and a primary voter at that:
Linda Howe, executive director of the Lucas County Board of Elections, said a Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher, whose address and age match Joe the Plumber’s, registered in Lucas County on Sept. 10, 1992. He voted in his first primary on March 4, 2008, registering as a Republican.
Ms. Howe said that the name may be misspelled in the database.
(This is, incidentally, the reason people worry about purging the voter rolls. They’re such a mess to begin with.)

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

This is such a comical debate. Bailing out wallstreet was a necessity, but giving more wealth to the middle class…well that is just socialisim. ahahhahahahaaaaaaa.. The fact of the matter is, that under the current administration, the middle class has been taxed harder than the upper 5% of the population. The middle class pays MORE in taxes than the upper classes do. Because of tax breaks/incentives most people making more than 250,000 pay less in taxes than someone making 30,000! That simply doesn’t make sense to me, nor the American Dream. The fact of the matter remains that working harder does not meant that you are creating more wealth, it just means that you are working harder. Anyway, if you look at Obama’s healthcare plan, Joe the Plumber is only going to pay literally 109 more dollars a year in taxes, (that is, once he actually makes more than 250,000 dollars a year) … all of that to say that truthfully it is about time. I am sick of the rich exploiting the poor! it is utterly ridiculous!

Posted by: Mizhani | October 16, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

The most brilliant part of Obama’s response to Joe the Plumber is that it doesn’t actually matter what Joe thinks about Obama’s response. Obama’s answer was directed at the voting public, to whom Obama made a lot of sense. That Joe doesn’t like the answer hardly matters: everyone else liked the explanation Obama have to Joe.
And reading the comments here, it looks like a lot of people have no idea how marginal taxes and tax brackets work.

Posted by: Tyro | October 16, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Karl Marx has left the building
I’m sorry but if you looked closely at the policies of the last 30 years you will see that we have made a huge shift toward socialism. The last 8 years have been more socialist than conservative but don’t let the facts get in your way.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | October 16, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Sen. McCain, Joe the Plumber & Sarah Palin:
Rich people SHOULD pay more taxes:
** You like our Military? Military is 20% of the budget. Defending the country benefits everyone; but it benefits the rich more, because they have more to defend. They have more homes to defend, more businesses to defend, more property value to defend … in the event of an invasion.
** Social Security – makes up another 20% of the budget — if you’ve put more into the system, you get higher payments when you retire.
** Investments in the nation’s infrastructure– transportation, education, research & development, energy, police subsidies, the courts, etc.– again are more useful to the rich. The interstates and airports benefit interstate commerce and people who can travel, not ghetto dwellers. Energy is used disproportionately by the rich and by industry.
** Education, better public schools benefit companies that benefit from a well-educated public. (If you don’t think that’s a benefit, go start up an engineering firm, or even a factory, in El Salvador.)
** The Bailout obviously benefits investors and large depositors. Rich people SHOULD have their taxes raised so THEY and THEY ALONE pay for the 700 Billion dollar bailout.
** Health Insurance. If the people are sick and can’t afford to stay well then the economy suffers because we will have an increased mortality rate. Who would clean the homes of these rich people if we are all dead

Posted by: yeahpaytaxes! | October 16, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Whatever Joe’s politics, which appear likely Republican, I think he is exhibiting a lots of class in these interviews, is clear about his views and says we should all do our own homework. So go do it. Joe is nowhere close to having *income* above $250K and will get a tax break from Obama’s plan, and is obviously unclear that people who earn more have always payed higher taxes at the margin. The only question is how much and the past eight years have been a bonanza for the rich at the expense of the middle class. It is time to correct this.
But this whole random sideshow says much more about John McCain than it says about Joe the Plumber. Let’s move on.

Posted by: Lawrence | October 16, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Turns out Joe the Plumber is a registered Republican who failed to pay his taxes two years ago and is not a licensed plumber.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 16, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“the only people who need to work less are the ones making more than $250k per year and are complaining that they have to pay too much in taxes.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!’
You’re about as dumb as a bag of rocks. Raise taxes on the job creators = good luck finding or keeping a job. Vote Obama and vote yourself out of a job. Hey, but at least you’ll have the last laugh.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Tax increases for the “fat cats” sounds pretty good to a lot of people right now.

Posted by: cincyr | October 16, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

“Turns out Joe the Plumber is a registered Republican who failed to pay his taxes two years ago and is not a licensed plumber.”
So sue him.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Progressive taxes make sense. The American Dream ™ is great and all, but what Americans often ignore is the fact that the social, physical and financial structure of our society is designed to support The American Dream. Thus, when people accumulate wealth, they are only able to do so because the framework of our society has allowed them to. People act like it’s all due to their own sweat and tears, but in reality it’s due to our combined sweat and tears.
Thus, as your wealth increases, you should recognize that it’s not all you and contribute back to the society that supported your ability to achieve The American Dream. My family will be well above the $250K line. I have no problem paying more taxes. My education was subsidized by tax payers. My opportunities were thus enabled by each and every one of us/you, and it’s enabled me to succeed. I owe gratitude to all Americans for this and I will happily pay my fair share.

Posted by: Aaron | October 16, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

So media in a few clicks on google
1.Joe the plumber the average joe mccain talks about isnt really named Joe
Its Samuel
Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher
2.he appears to be a registered Republican, and a primary voter at that:
Linda Howe, executive director of the Lucas County Board of Elections, said a Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher, whose address and age match Joe the Plumber’s, registered in Lucas County on Sept. 10, 1992. He voted in his first primary on March 4, 2008, registering as a Republican.
So his mind was already made up!
3. is a close relative of Robert Wurzelbacher of Milford, Ohio. Whos Robert Wurzelbacher? Only Charles Keatings son-in-law and the former senior vice president of American Continental, the parent company of the infamous Lincoln Savings and Loan. The now retired elder Wurzelbacher is also a major contributor to Republican causes giving well over $10,000 in the last few years.
4. He will recieve tax cuts under Obama!
5.He liked Barack Obama to Sammy davis jnr!

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

This is exactly why people hate liberals. You know what’s best for society, as long it falls in line with your ideals. I hope America wakes up and pushes you all back to the fringe where you belong.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

its sort of funny to hear the republicans prognosticate economic gloom and doom forthcoming . heck ,its already here in case you didnt notice.
one thing for you all to realize is that the laws that are in place now that allow business to do just about anything they want …WILL BE CHANGED.
yep.so laws that businesses use today to make bigger profits but pay less taxes (like moving overseas /hiring illegal immigrants/etc) are going to be STOPPED PRONTO.
NEW (LIBERAL MAJORITY PENNED) BUSINESS LAWS WILL BE PUT IN PLACE (SOME ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED RIGHT NOW THANKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS)THAT MAKE BUSINESS PAY UP AND BE FAIR ,OR CLOSE DOWN AND LET SOMEONE ELSE TAKE OVER WILL BE IN PLACE , SO DO YOUR DAMNEDEST TO HURT THIS COUNTRY YOU SELFISH REPUBLICAN ASSES…YOU WILL JUST BE SHOOTING YOURSELF IN THE FOOT!!

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

So Joe the plumber is a registered republican. I thought that Obama was the great unifier working across party lines. I find it funny that Obamabots bring it up because I could obviously see from Joe’s demeanor was not as adoring as Obamabots and God forbid that anyone ask Obama a question rather than asking him if they could be his Myspace friend. There are a lot of undecided voters who are registered with some party.
Oooh His name is Samuel but he goes by Joe…Wow burn him at the stake.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“Crawl back into your sewer you rat before you get stepped on. The difference between me and you? I’d say this to your face, you’re too afraid to go out there and say what you just said to the candidate. ”
All dissent must be silenced! Part of the final solution.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

The proposed tax increase would only take us back to the same tax policy that the upper brackets experienced prior to the current Bush administration. Bush gave a huge tax cut to the wealthy. Obama is saying he’d reverse that and give the cut to middle and low income earners.
Joe the Plumber is extremely confused about US tax practices. We’ve not had a uniform flat tax on income for everyone for as long as I can remember. We’ve always asked higher income earners to pay a higher percentage.
Joe, if you’re out there, think of it this way: regardless of your income level, all Americans have to pay for the basics like food, housing, fuel, etc. If you’re relatively poor, virtually all of your income goes to pay for basics. If you’re relatively wealthy, you have money left over and may spend it on nice things, vacations, etc. Essentially, our government taxes only income above that which is needed to meet only a low, very basic necessity standard of living. The higher you go above that standard, the higher percentage of income you are expected to contribute toward the cost of running our country (defense, building roads, providing services for disabled children, etc.)

Posted by: Bonnie | October 16, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

The argument that the so called middle class is short of money right now – can be said for every class of citizens.
The reason being – the Dems in keeping with their intention to enlarge their voter base at any cost – saw to it low income/even no income people could get a no document, no job, no money mortage. This practice placed into play by the Carter Administration – continued by every Democrat politican able to drag the theory along – eventually – due to the lowering of real estate inventory, thus rise of real estate prices, MADE READY CASH ADVANCES OTHERWISE KNOWS AS HOME EQUITY LOANS avaiable to Americans of every class. The bad mortgages went south, banks began to fail, big problems. Real estate prices dropped and many citizens find themselves upside down on their home mortgages. The low income mortgage trickled sideways. Let’s give thanks to Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and Barack Obama and every politican that filled their pockets with payoff money from Freddie and Fannie.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TRICKLE UP ECONOMICS.
An Obama lie – 98% of small businesses do not net $250K or less – small business classification is upward of 5m annual sales. This is the heart of employment – these small to medium businesses which Obama wants to pin down.
If anyone thinks the middle class is short of cash right now – just wait until Obama’s socilistic policies are in full gear. AMERICA WAKE UP – Obama is a shell of a man – put where he is by socialistic forces unfriendly (to say the least) to this country and the strength of the American people.
READ, ANALYZE, UNDERSTAND THE POLICIES THE IDEALOGY BEHIND THE POLICIES AND VOTE FOR THE GOOD OF YOUR COUNTRY.
McCain/Palin 2008!!! and Joe the Plumber for man of the year!!!!!

Posted by: RAltiere | October 16, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Tyro says:
“And reading the comments here, it looks like a lot of people have no idea how marginal taxes and tax brackets work.”
Good point. Go to taxfoundation dot org and scroll down to the “Obama and McCain Tax Proposals Raise Marginal Tax Rates for Many Middle-Income Taxpayers” story. Click on the “Read the new Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact” link. It’s an eye opener for all the dummies out there who honestly believe a liberal Democrat will cut their taxes.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Mack
“Raise taxes on the job creators = good luck finding or keeping a job. Vote Obama and vote yourself out of a job. Hey, but at least you’ll have the last laugh.”
Mack,
Tell this to Georg W., he lowered tax, and our unemployment is rising sky high.
Jobs shipped away to China and Mexico!
Bey bey jobs, bey bey tax, bey bey America.
Obama is right. Do you know how much efforts it costs to import stuff into China, how much efforts it costs just to open a subsidiary.
It’s no free trade, it’s stupidity. The only reason we allow this bad deal is that we keep borrowing mony from China.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

“Oooh His name is Samuel but he goes by Joe…Wow burn him at the stake.’
I bet he even drinks coffee instead of lattes. How gauche!

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Progressive taxes make sense. The American Dream ™ is great and all, but what Americans often ignore is the fact that the social, physical and financial structure of our society is designed to support The American Dream. Thus, when people accumulate wealth, they are only able to do so because the framework of our society has allowed them to. People act like it’s all due to their own sweat and tears, but in reality it’s due to our combined sweat and tears.
Thus, as your wealth increases, you should recognize that it’s not all you and contribute back to the society that supported your ability to achieve The American Dream. My family will be well above the $250K line. I have no problem paying more taxes. My education was subsidized by tax payers. My opportunities were thus enabled by each and every one of us/you, and it’s enabled me to succeed. I owe gratitude to all Americans for this and I will happily pay my fair share.
Posted by: Aaron | Oct 16, 2008 12:53:52 PM
Aaron ,you sound like oliver wendell holmes….good job and well said!!

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Welcome to Obamanation! Here is a working man providing a needed service, and the Obamabots ATTACK him for DARING to disagree with their Dear Leader.
Attention all socialists: If you create disincentives for businesses to provide VALUABLE services by overtaxing them, there won’t be enough of us working stiffs to pay all your big fat govt handouts.
Back off of Joe the plumber, he’s a hard working guy who does what he is SUPPOSED to do: work and pay his own way. Why don’t y’all get jobs and pay your own way?

Posted by: MJ | October 16, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“Tell this to Georg W., he lowered tax, and our unemployment is rising sky high.
Jobs shipped away to China and Mexico!”
Si senor. We need an economy like we had under Jimmy Carter with double digit unemployement and out of control inflation. Vote Obama and vote yourself out of a job.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Mack doesn’t like it being pointed out that Joe the Plumber is just another lying Republican who cheats on his taxes.

Posted by: Ryan c | October 16, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

I’m in the top 1% and I’m wondering how I can learn about these loop holes I keep hearing about. I got taxed HEAVILY last year, and if Obama gets elected, it will go higher. However, I’m an ardent Obama supporter, and I look at it this way. The middle class works 5 months a year to pay taxes, and they work 6.5 months to pay for their necessities. (home, auto, insurance, clothes, food, etc) I work about 5.5 months to pay taxes (state, property and federal), but I work about 1 month to cover basic necessities for the year. This leaves me with about 5.5 months of income to invest, go on vacation with, give to charity, etc. The rich in the country aren’t hurting. Their complaints about paying more in taxes are purely greed driven. (believe me, I even get tempted by the greed bug sometimes) Our economy needs a strong middle class, and trickle down economics doesn’t work.

Posted by: Not_a_plumber | October 16, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“Back off of Joe the plumber, he’s a hard working guy who does what he is SUPPOSED to do: work and pay his own way. Why don’t y’all get jobs and pay your own way?”
Ahh yes, another canard, if you want fair tax law you must be an unemployed person.

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

This guy is a relative Charles Keating.
Nice plant McSame!

Posted by: D | October 16, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

jill, how in the world is saying that Obama tap danced around the issue “like Sammy Davis, Jr.” racist? Would it have been racist if he had said “like Fred Astaire” instead?
Why is it that Obama supporters see racism lurking around every corner? And why is it that every criticism or Obama is deemed racist?
One would think you’re trying to silence any opposing views!

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

“Si senor. We need an economy like we had under Jimmy Carter with double digit unemployement and out of control inflation. Vote Obama and vote yourself out of a job.”
No thanks, I’ll take the economy we had under Clinton. So will 54% of American voters. Don’t worry, you don’t have to vote for the guy to prosper.

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

“Back off of Joe the plumber, he’s a hard working guy who does what he is SUPPOSED to do: work and pay his own way. Why don’t y’all get jobs and pay your own way?”
Hahaha…
It’s gonna blow up in McCain’s face…

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Joe went to the event and did want any voter would do. Asked Obama to clarify something. It blew up in Obama’s face. So now according to Obama supporters Joe is a lying racist republican.
You ever get the feeling that if a reporter from a highschool newspaper interviewed Obama on Nickelodeon and somehow tripped Obama up in one of his lies. The Obamabots would show up to the kid’s study hall with a high caliber weapon?

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

It is interesting reading these comments. i am one of the 95%. DoI think it is going to help me what Obama proposes. I don’t think so. If you want to see what this country is going to look at from a very smooth talking Obama look at Michigan. We have a Minny look at what this country would be. Unemployment at 8.9%. they are talking double diget in the near future. We already have an Obama in womens clothing as a govenor. I voted for her the first go around, and after nothing she said got done I voted for someone else. i am not telling anyone to vote for Mc Cain. Look at records and the past. If Mr Obama has nothing to hide why has he not come out with his past relationships, college information, where his collage loans came from. I have an 18 year old daughter going to college. She would have liked to go to Harvard also, nut could never afford it. how did he. Mr Obama quit dancing around and give use firm hard undisputable facts. I am feed up with politions thinking the average person is stupid. I will finish with no matter who you vote for, research them and make sure they are really the best choice. Thank You

Posted by: Scoop | October 16, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

After informing us all that Joe’s saying the name “Sammy Davis, Jr.” was racist, jill went on to say:
“Apparently he thinks an African-
American who aspires to the office of the presidency is as laughable as a dancing ape.”
Now if that isn’t a racist statement, then I don’t know what is – plus you’ve maligned one of America’s greatest and most successful entertainers.
Nice world you live in – NOT! Look in the mirror – Joe isn’t the racist here, you are!

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

“Joe went to the event and did want any voter would do. Asked Obama to clarify something. It blew up in Obama’s face. So now according to Obama supporters Joe is a lying racist republican.”
you guys are the ones saying he’s a racist. No one here has argued that. He is a republican, not an ‘independent’ as he claimed, so that does make him a liar. A racist? No. So why is it every time the race card gets played, it’s a republican playing it?

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Woody,
That is using a more conservative economic definition of marginal taxes.
“Each person’s marginal tax rate is the amount that they pay in tax on their last dollar of income.”

Posted by: Ryan C | October 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

If Obama can’t deal with a republican plant, how will he deal with Al Queda or Iran?
Obamabots you guys are running on fumes.
It is Joes fault because manchild Obama answered the question in true socialist fashion. Talk about revisionist history.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Nice world you live in – NOT! Look in the mirror – Joe isn’t the racist here, you are! -marylou
=======================================
To prove my point, another republican plays the race card. Why can’t you guys accept the fact that you’re losing fair and square?

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

It is very interesting that Joe the Plumber turns out to not have a plumber’s license. Is it even legal that he is doing plumbing work? Again, regulations are in place to protect the public. Plumbing, electrical work, etc. is mandated to be done by a licensed professional so the homeowner won’t get scammed by some yahoo who thinks he knows what he is doing.
Joe the plumber needs to have an investigative reportercheck him out. He is just hired help but is now in a position to buy a business either worth $250,000 or grossing $250,000, depending on the different news article I’ve read. Yet he doesn’t seem to understand about taking a salary from your own business and/or business deductions. My brother-in-law works as a lot as a plumber, knows a lot of plumbers who own their own companies, works in a high-paying area of the country and he doesn’t know anyone making that kind of money. Things have been slow for the last two years.
Joe the plumber is a mighty suspicious character.

Posted by: Lydia | October 16, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Economies grow when businesses are encouraged to create value. Economies shrink when businesses are penalized for being successful.
When businesses grow by creating value, jobs are created and the economy grows.
When jobs are created, more wealth is created and tax revenues increase, so that those who are truly needy (elderly, disabled, etc.) can receive their benefits.
When the economy shrinks, there is less for the truly needy.
People who work 12, 12, 14 hour days make more money than people that work 8 hour days. People who work all day and go to school at night, make more than people who choose not to do so.
Punishing people for working longer hours or furthering their education by taking from them and giving to people who choose not to, is unfair, and worse than that, it discourages people from working longer hours or going to school.
These are not difficult concepts to grasp.

Posted by: Economist | October 16, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

It is a common fact that wealth equals power. The more money I have to invest the better leverage I have whether it is in a shareholder meeting or with city / state governments. The wealth owner usually sets the rules and obviously has the natural advantage in employer-employee negotiation. The mildest way of neutralizing this advantage is by encouraging wealth creation near the grassroots rather than accumulation at the top. Obama’s tax policies are a step in this direction and I am proud to support them. Wealth created at the bottom will raise all boats, even those of the rich !

Posted by: BluePlanet | October 16, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

ted, in my world Sammy Davis, Jr. and Fred Astaire are equal. I don’t see color when I look at them. I see two gifted entertainers. How sad that so many Obama supporters see only color.

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

“he’s a hard working guy who does what he is SUPPOSED to do: work and pay his own way”
Except he doesn’t pay his taxes and doesn’t bothered to get licensed as a plumber.
I wonder how real plumbers feel such a scab.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 16, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

USMC Joe was called a racist when this topic was first put up by jake. the comments have since been deleted. My point is you should be more concerned about Obama’s answer than about Joe. If Obama’s answer turned off voters that is not Joe’s fault. I don’t care who Joe is.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

“We have a Minny look at what this country would be. Unemployment at 8.9%. they are talking double diget in the near future.”
Exactly. It’s like what happened with Fannie and Freddie, we are sounding the alarm, and these people are too caught up in the adoration of their Messiah to notice.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Obamabots you guys are running on fumes.
========================================
talk about delusional. :-) Are you part of the band on the titanic or just one of the people listening to it pretending your ship isn’t sinking?

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Its funny to watch McCain try to cast himself as the defender of the American worker and middle class.
Let’s see, while he took favors from Keating and advanced deregulation, the country lost our manufacturing base; the national debt increased to astronomical proportions; wealth became even more concentrated in the hands of the top 500 people. I don’t think I want to continue to mortgage my daughter’s future with another 8 years of “trickle down” credit card economics.

Posted by: Mulvaney | October 16, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

“I wonder how real plumbers feel such a scab. ”
A scab would be a non-union worker that takes the job of a union worker during a strike.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

USMC Joe was called a racist when this topic was first put up by jake. the comments have since been deleted. My point is you should be more concerned about Obama’s answer than about Joe. If Obama’s answer turned off voters that is not Joe’s fault. I don’t care who Joe is.
========================================
Fair enough, but I’d say people don’t care about Obama’s answer, either.

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

The political bickering is planned to distract from our thinking about capability to analyze and communicate, to have this capability to analyze and communicate result in good judgment in choosing advisors and in coordinating the best ideas for America, not just the simplistic ideas. The simplistic distractions are planned to keep voters from thinking about how much poor judgment (Like Keating Five and the last eight years of agreeing with the administration on war and deregulation) costs Americans in resources and in life and limb.
The special interests and lobby groups want to buy government decisions on the cheap and take advantage of Americans without having to deal with the complex results that might cripple our nation. They get people from the top of their class to represent them and manipulate to take advantage. We are too lax about the possibility that we might be represented by those from the bottom of their class and that we might be making it easy for the special interest lobby groups to take advantage of us. Again!!!
Having effective and timely studies by our government led by those from the top of their class has been lacking at great cost to us all. We have lost planes due to neglect in the timely study of flight manuals. We have lost lives and livelihood due to neglect in the timely study of intelligence information. We have lost a solid economy due to neglect in the timely study of needed regulations and deregulations. We have lost our standing in the world due to neglect in the timely study of diplomacy and when and how to successfully use it. Our country has had to have an expensive surge with financial payments to those who would oppose and expensive bailout with hopes that these, although expensive, will fix some of the poor judgment and will work in the long run.
It is time to replace the simplistic attitudes and ideas useful in manipulation with a stronger understanding of ideas useful in doing the strong work needed to get us back on track. This needs to be led by a dedicated president from the top of his class, rather than by the special interest lobby group who are carefully selected and paid to take advantage of America.
Again!!! Let’s be careful in rebuilding our country’s capabilities. We cannot buy off on Palin’s advice not to be concerned about killing civilians. We cannot buy off on McCain’s “I know how to” claims on how to win a war , fix the economy and so on. These are simplistic ideas of those from the bottom of their class, not based on effective studies. They are useful in delighting the emotions of supporters.

Posted by: Michael Steib | October 16, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

“talk about delusional. :-) Are you part of the band on the titanic or just one of the people listening to it pretending your ship isn’t sinking? ”
Obama’s economic plan is like sending the iceberg to rescue the Titanic.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

ted, in my world Sammy Davis, Jr. and Fred Astaire are equal. I don’t see color when I look at them. I see two gifted entertainers. How sad that so many Obama supporters see only color.
=======================================
What a saint!

Posted by: Mother theresa | October 16, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Mack
“Si senor. We need an economy like we had under Jimmy Carter with double digit unemployement and out of control inflation. Vote Obama and vote yourself out of a job.”
Mack, pretty lame argument, but we’re used to it.
We need to return to the Clinton years back, not the Reagan, papa Bush and baby Bush era.
Economically conservative, cutting spending, socially liberal.
President Obama will do a fine job, with Warren Buffet, Luger and maybe Powell, Bloomberg we will get the smartest cabinet ever!

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Obama’s economic plan is like sending the iceberg to rescue the Titanic.
=======================================
And McCain’s is the 35 degree water that killed most of the passengers.

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

People who work 12, 12, 14 hour days make more money than people that work 8 hour days. People who work all day and go to school at night, make more than people who choose not to do so.
Punishing people for working longer hours or furthering their education by taking from them and giving to people who choose not to, is unfair, and worse than that, it discourages people from working longer hours or going to school.
These are not difficult concepts to grasp.

Posted by: Working Stiff | October 16, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Joe the Plumber really is no fan of paying taxes.
According to records from the Lucas County (OH) Court of Common Pleas found by my colleague Avi Zenilman, Samuel J. Wurzelbacher has a lien placed against him to the tune of $1,182.92.
The lien is dated from January of ’07

Posted by: Patrick | October 16, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

USMC have you seen the polls? Obama’s lead is shrinking and his Joe debacle had a lot to do with it because Obama outed himself as a socialist.
Come on, you guys have to stop protecting Obama. He is afraid to talk to Sean Hannity. Joe is a republican and a racist according to you Obamabots so Obama should not talk to him.
How is Obama going to talk to world leaders and adversaries?
Your Messiah had better grow some balls.
if he is elected

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

“Why do Obamabots hate Joe the plumber? Because he works for a living? That’s stupid, who do you expect to pay your entitlement programs for you if not us working stiffs? ”
We’ll all gather our sustenance from hope, change, and more ethereal rhetoric.
Si Su Puede!

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

“Your Messiah had better grow some balls.
if he is elected”
He doesn’t have to. He’ll just sue whomever stands in his way.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

“Why do Obamabots hate Joe the plumber? Because he works for a living?”
Because it’s a Karl Grove tactic..
We are just laughing because it will blow in McCain’s face…again!

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“Darned kids with your fair taxes and josbs creation”
What job creation? When has he ever ceated a single job?

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Check this out: whenever the Obamabots know they are losing an argument, they switch their talking points from the issue at hand to a personal attack. Instead of talking about tax policy, they want to attack Joe the plumber.
So for every personal attack you see on Joe the Plumber, understand they KNOW they are losing. They can’t attack the POLICY of fair taxation, so they attack the TAXPAYER. They learned that trick form Obama their Dear leader.

Posted by: Analyst | October 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“People who work all day and go to school at night, make more than people who choose not to do so.”
then guess what einstein?
THEY HAVE TO PAY MORE IN TAXES SINCE THEY MADE MORE MONEY…THATS THE LAW OF THE LAND FOR MANY MANY YEARS…HAITI HAS LOWER TAXES, MUCH LOWER.
I PROPOSE THAT ANY AMERICANS WHO THINKS THEY PAY TOO MUCH IN TAXES IS FREE TO LEAVE FORTHWITH!!
ENJOY YOUR NEW LIFE WHEREVER AND PLEASE REMEMBER …DONT COME BACK HERE… THIS COUNTRY IS ABOUT TO CHANGE INTO A BETTER PLACE OF FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY…YOU WONT LIKE IT…
additionally ,for an economist you have a pretty shaky grasp of the situation at present ,imo.

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

USMC have you seen the polls? Obama’s lead is shrinking and his Joe debacle had a lot to do with it because Obama outed himself as a socialist.
Come on, you guys have to stop protecting Obama. He is afraid to talk to Sean Hannity. Joe is a republican and a racist according to you Obamabots so Obama should not talk to him.
How is Obama going to talk to world leaders and adversaries?
=================================
And you keep believing Obama is dropping in those polls. If want you to.

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

usms keep believing, but Obama is going to lose. see ya.

Posted by: The Surge | October 16, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Check this out: whenever the Obamabots know they are losing an argument, they switch their talking points from the issue at hand to a personal attack. Instead of talking about tax policy, they want to attack Joe the plumber.
So for every personal attack you see on Joe the Plumber, understand they KNOW they are losing. They can’t attack the POLICY of fair taxation, so they attack the TAXPAYER. They learned that trick form Obama their Dear leader.
=======================================
Check this out, when republicans run out of ideas they like to call the opponent dirty names and use codewords like ‘dear leader’. Too bad they’re losing.
Feel free to keep peddling crap, though. 3 weeks of it has put your candidates in the cellar, and both have higher negatives than positives. so keep it up tinfoil brigade!

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

USMC – you may not care about Joe the Plumber’s answer, but many in America do. 45% of Americans pay no tax. The idea is to collect taxes from the upper 5% and give that money to the lower 95%.
There is the notion of a fair tax where everyone pays the same percentage. Now, we all know that use of the word “fair” is different than the Obama’s use of the word.
I have seen the class war fare in all of these blogs. Look at the terrible things the democrats are saying. Obama should have repudiated Lewis calling McCain George Wallace. McCain was behind the the amnesty bill and the no child left behind bills – working with Ted Kennedy. If they will come after John McCain, they will eventually come after the other 55% of us.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

pennsylvania voter says:
“I’m sorry but if you looked closely at the policies of the last 30 years you will see that we have made a huge shift toward socialism. The last 8 years have been more socialist than conservative but don’t let the facts get in your way.”
You speak of facts but all I see are opinions and conjecture. Care to present some facts? If you’re talking about our nearly boundless spending (over 40% of the federal budget) on socialized medicine and the Ponzi scheme known as Social Security, I agree. What percentage went to those programs in 1978? I don’t know.
Hey, I think Bush has been a requisite failure. He’s certainly no conservative and spending is out of control. But irresponsible spending does not equate to socialism, it’s just poor fiscal policy.

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

dont forget hard working americans, in haiti you can work 24/7/365 ,all the overtime you want and pay almost NO TAXES…
my question is: WHY THE HELL ARENT YOU THERE ALREADY???
waiting for a cogent response…

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“whenever the Obamabots know they are losing an argument, they switch their talking points from the issue at hand to a personal attack. Instead of talking about tax policy, they want to attack Joe the plumber.”
Now I get it. Joe the Plumber was a democrat plant to confuse the McCain zealots.
Pretty lame argument if you ask me..

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Quite frankly I am not too concerned about how much someone making $250k is being taxed. Right now I am working in Community Mental Health as a therapist and have to work a second job as a bartender just in order to be able to come anywhere close to paying my $75k worth of student loans for a grand total of 70+ hours a week with no days off. Someone making 5 times as much as I am being taxed more is not something I am worried about.

Posted by: NWtherapist | October 16, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

USMC – you may not care about Joe the Plumber’s answer, but many in America do. 45% of Americans pay no tax. The idea is to collect taxes from the upper 5% and give that money to the lower 95%.
========================================
That would be socialism, too bad that’s not Obama’s policy. his policy is 95% of taxpayers. so there’s no handout to the 45% who pay no tax. You know this though, but you insist on lying because it’s the only way you can claim Obama is a Socialist. Unfortunately for you, a clear majority knows this and the more radical, fringe and reactionary you guys get the more McCain drops. so keep up the good work!

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Speaking of work, I better get back to it. Have a great day and God protect our soldiers!

Posted by: USMC | October 16, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

OH JOE….
So (Joe) Samuel voted in the 2008 Republican Primary right!
The 2008 Ohio Republican primary took place on March 4, 2008. March 4 is also the night that McCain secured the Republican Nomination.
Hmm interesting LOL
He appears to be a registered Republican, and a primary voter at that:
Linda Howe, executive director of the Lucas County Board of Elections, said a Samuel Joseph Worzelbacher, whose address and age match Joe the Plumber’s, registered in Lucas County on Sept. 10, 1992. He voted in his first primary on March 4, 2008, registering as a Republican.
So his mind was already made up!
DO YOUR JOB MEDIA !!!

Posted by: Mike NC | October 16, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Conservative nutcases who make all the arguements for hih imncome bracket people dont understand what democracy is. I personally am not democrat or Liberal but theres is somethihg in the tax arguement that makes sense to me. If the number of low income people are the majority and they are given a greater relief than the minority… its just plain democracy… the will of the majority… rite now “‘Joe’ the plumber or whatever he does for a living” figures in that top 5% of the economy. If he cant afford to own that business because of Obamas tax plan then he does not deserve it and rightly so. Let us not forget that this entire crisis was spawned because of the unjustified American dream to own a home. If Joe doesnt have the resources to handle a justifiable tax increase…and for gods sake we are talking of maybe a 1000 dollars or more per annum…i he cant handle that…he doesnt deserve to own that business. And whats all this horseshit plan on taxing the clerk who makes 10$ per hr at Walmart pays no taxes. This disdain for poor people combined with dogmatic arrogance caused the countyry to be in its current crisis.

Posted by: Ashwin | October 16, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Wow. People are really dumb. Or maybe they’re just not listening to “Joe the Plumber”. Why would they when what he says is such an indictment of Obama’s policies? His whole point is clearly WHY SHOULD HE BOTHER OWNING A BUSINESS if the whole reason he wants to do so in the first place is to enter into the targeted income bracket? He’s telling us all that the incentive to even BE a small business owner will be destroyed by Obama’s policies. And even more than that, he points out that Obama’s way of thinking is like a genie that once out of the bottle can’t be put back. Obama’s brand of socialism truly is a “slippery slope” and once allowed to start, who knows where it will end?

Posted by: ConcernedCitizenX | October 16, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Joe owes back taxes on his income and that has resulted in a lien on his property. How’s about Joe pays his PAST DUE taxes before he starts talking about what he might pay if he were to ever get a business license (which he doesn’t have) and make over $250,000 (which he does not make).

Posted by: JW | October 16, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

USMC – you are not making any sense. You surely do not dispute the class war fare ploy that Obama has put forward to only increase the taxes on the top 5%.
The extra tax on the upper 5% is going to be distributed in programs. You surely do not dispute that.
And of course you realize that the bottom 45% pay no tax. Now you may think the bottom 45% are living in houses with dirt floors. Not in America where every one has a cell phone.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Ryan,
You sent me to this site a few weeks ago and I keep finding great comparitive views of the two candidates’ tax plans. Sure, their definition of marginal tax rate is pretty conservative but that’s OK with me.
Any comment on the Tax Foundation analysis that claims half of today’s income tax filers that pay no taxes (32% of Americans) will be receiving checks from you and me under the Obama plan?

Posted by: Woody | October 16, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Since when have Republicans worried about plumbers or other ordinary people who work for living. Case in point Wall Street Deregulation etc.

Posted by: Protolytes | October 16, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

He clearly does NOT want to be taxes that’s why he hasn’t paid his state taxes from 2007. Why is this registered Republican who voted in the primary for McCain getting free publicity for the McCain campaign?

Posted by: Dawn | October 16, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

You get taxed on your adjusted gross, not your net. Have any of you ever even paid taxes, for Chrissakes?

Posted by: Prez | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

ConcernedCitizenX point that Joe the Plumber does not like Obama’s tax plan is that Joe wants to work and be successful – make a place for his family.
If we tax punitively, we will drive all of the talent out of the country. The democrats on a “hate” high will then say go ahead leave. The democrats have become the “George Wallace” of the bad old days – worse.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Isn’t the income tax a direct tax, and there for unconstitutional according to our constitution. Don’t give me the 16th amendment, with it being ratified before the had the proper percentages were met.

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Some of you people are amazing. You talk like Obama is going to punish any company that is successful, please try to remember that even if you’re a successful company making $250,000 or more you will still be paying LESS taxes than you did under Clinton and about the same as they were under Reagan. This isn’t about punishment, its about equilibrium. Returning to a more stable American industrial and financial engine. i don’t seem to recall society collapsing and businesses shutting down under Clinton, in fact, i seem to recall a federal surplus…

Posted by: Cory | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

I think Joe was probably a plant, and the fact that he quoted 250k and is named Joe seems suspicious. Just an excuse for republican TV to run it over and over. I have a small business, and I am voting for Barack Obama. I like Barack Obama’s healthcare plan. I am a veteran and I’m voting for Barack Obama, because McCain always votes against veterans. As a middle class American, I’m voting for Barack Obama because John McCain only cares about multi-millionaires. Go Obama/Biden!

Posted by: Joe | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Actually, you claim that Obama’s plan talks only about “taxpayers” is false on its face as that is NOT what the Obama plan does.
The Obama plan calls welfare checks a “tax cut.” His plan revolves around dozens of new “refundable” tax credits. That means that, even if you owe $0 in tax, you can still claim the credit and get a refund from the government. That’s a welfare check. And eligibility is neither dependent on, nor even related to, you being a “taxpayer” (which most of us would define as a person who pays at least some non-$0 amount in taxes).
So, when Obama talks about 95% of taxpayers, he really means 95% of people. If he were only giving cuts to “taxpayers” as you say then there would be no refunding of these credits.
Under Obama if you fill out your tax form and the number in the “Tax Due” line is $0, but you have kids in day care, then you can claim Obama’s new “child care credit” and get a check for $5,000. How is this person a taxpayer, and how is a $5,000 handout a tax cut? Oh, that’s right, we’re working on whatever definition of those terms makes Obama’s plan sound good. The correct answer here is that these people are not taxpayers, and therefore the free money they receive is not a tax cut.

Posted by: reldim | October 16, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Does Joe mind paying higher taxes if he makes $250k? Joe says he doesn’t want to pay higher taxes if he ever makes $250k. He says that it’s not fair that those making that much pay more.
Let’s rephrase the question: Joe, do you mind paying lower tax rates now when you make probably less than $50k per year? Oh, so you don’t mind having the wealthy pay your taxes for you under the current tax system.
Also, is that $280k he mentioned company revenue? Gross income before expenses? If that’s the case, he’s no where near Obama’s $250k limit!!!
Get a grip Joe….

Posted by: TW | October 16, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Ahaha … The Joe, the Plumber story.
It must be something like this…
Karl Rove:
We need a gimmick, a stunt for the next debate. Another SwiftBoot … anything. As long as it doesn’t isn’t to difficult. Sarah can’t handle it.
Rick Davis:
He will be in Ohio next week. Maybe we can get a guy of us and do some heckling, pretending like he is independent voter.
McCain:
I know the brother of the son in law of one of my best friend. You know Charles K.
Rick Davis:
Which Charles..
McCain:
Don’t be dumb, Charles Keating! He and his father are big republican supporters and donators. His name is Sam, he is a plumber.
Karl Grove:
Sam the Plumber, Sam the Plumber.. doesn’t have that Betcha, sixpack feeling. Let’s call him Joe… Yeah.. Joe The Plumber!
McCain:
Karl, my friend. You pulled it off again!

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Obama and his goons are now out to destroy Joe the plumber. Obama doesn’t want an America with people like Joe in it. Obama wants people that act and think and act like Ivy League professors or welfare queens. So what if Joe is a Republican. Oh, right. Obama won’t be president of those people.
Also, Obama’s tax plan isnt a tax cutting plan, it’s a welfare/giveaway plan. Cutting a check is the same as cutting a tax and Obama and his tools in the media know it.
Plus, the liberals in Congress are going to push for much higher taxes than Obama says he wants and he that hath no spine will go along and accommodate their extremism. Just like Bill Clinton promised a tax cut in 1992 but delivered a tax hike in 1993, Obama’s promises are just empty words and we can’t trust this America-hating, terrorist-palling, tax and spend Socialist!

Posted by: Real American | October 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

TW – Joe the plumber wants the tax plan to be the old fashioned definition of fair – everyone pays and everyone pays the same percentage.
The New Obama definition of the word “fair” is that only successful people pay. They worked hard, they deserve to pay more.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

CLabs – you probably missed the part of the debate where it was made perfectly clear that Bush is not running this year.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

When Diane Sawyer asked Joe “the plumber” whether he had been contacted by the McCain campaign, Joe W. replied that he’d been contacted to go to a rally. Which rally? Was he asked to go to the Obama rally – or a McCain rally?

Posted by: LVH | October 16, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

“So what if Joe is a Republican”
Because Sam or Joe is nothing more than a Karl Grove tactic. He and his father are more than just republicans.
Joe is a republican plant, setup by the McCain campaign to manipulate us.
The first time I saw him on tv I knew there was some fishy stuff going on. This guy wasn’t telling the truth.
Well.. this story will end one of the most nuttiest campaign in history.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Tell you what, Joe.
You’re married with kids? Why should you get a deduction for those kids? Your choice, right? And you chose to buy a house – so let’s take away your mortgage deduction. In fact, let’s take away ALL your deductions.
Now let’s look at taxes. Your kids go to public school, use the local park district – you should pay for all of those, and I shouldn’t because I don’t use them.
Iraq War? You supported that, I don’t – you can pay for the whole thing. Stiglitz has it up to about 3 trillion dollars now in total.
How’s your tax bill looking now, Joe??

Posted by: Tom J | October 16, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Nevermind ‘Joe the Plumber’ what about ‘Andrew the Cancer patient’?
All we hear about is Joe. Like his small business is more important than healthcare for people with pre-conditions. Typical America, so lost in the dollar that we have forgotten the importance of living.

Posted by: Andrew | October 16, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“I’m in the top 1% and I’m wondering how I can learn about these loop holes I keep hearing about. I got taxed HEAVILY last year, and if Obama gets elected, it will go higher. However, I’m an ardent Obama supporter, and I look at it this way. The middle class works 5 months a year to pay taxes, and they work 6.5 months to pay for their necessities. (home, auto, insurance, clothes, food, etc) I work about 5.5 months to pay taxes (state, property and federal), but I work about 1 month to cover basic necessities for the year. This leaves me with about 5.5 months of income to invest, go on vacation with, give to charity, etc. The rich in the country aren’t hurting. Their complaints about paying more in taxes are purely greed driven. (believe me, I even get tempted by the greed bug sometimes) Our economy needs a strong middle class, and trickle down economics doesn’t work.”
You have perfectly explained trickle down economics and why it does work. The 5.5 months of income you “invest, go on vacation with, give to charity, etc.” does more to create jobs and wealth for others than the 5.5 months of taxes you pay. Plus, you had the FREEDOM to choose where it went. It’s not about you, as a 1% earner, hurting or not. It’s about ALL tax payers in every bracket being able to keep more of THEIR MONEY, to “spread” as they see fit, not as the government see fit.
Many of us believe that the government already takes too much from ALL tax payers and want to see spending and taxes cut, not increased. You can disagree with this position based on some idea of “fairness” but the pure economics of it are that wealth is created when those who EARN money invest and spend it, creating jobs for others. Not through government mandated redistribution.

Posted by: Lower Taxes Work For Everyone | October 16, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

When Phil Gramm called America “a nation of whiners”, he must have had Joe Wurzelbacher in mind.

Posted by: Pacific moderate | October 16, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Whenever someone knows they are losing an argument, they switch their talking points from the issue at hand to a personal attack. Read through this thread and you will see whichever side is losing will stop discussing tax policy and start attacking Joe the plumber.
So for every personal attack you see on Joe the Plumber, understand they KNOW they are losing. They can’t attack the POLICY of fair taxation, so they attack the TAXPAYER. They learned that trick from Obama their Dear leader, the great hater of free speech.

Posted by: Good point | October 16, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Of course Obama is a socialist look at the mentors in his life and people he has learned from the past to the present. What has been his representation? Some of you people need to take some Sociology courses.

Posted by: social justice | October 16, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

The other thing I think Obama should stress more, is this question:
Why should companies who layoff Americans in favor of cheap labor overseas, get a break on their taxes? OBVIOUSLY THE CASH AINT TRICKLING DOWN at that point. I fear for how blind the Republicans are. Fear…

Posted by: Andrew | October 16, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Bottom line: Obama wants to punish successful people thereby taking away any incentive to be successful.
The bottom 40% who pay zero taxes but suck up government handouts aren’t going away – and Obama is going to increase their share of government goodies.
So while the need for taxes grows, the tax revenues themselves will decline.
The middle class has no choice but to continue working to pay their own bills. Thus, they will forever be a source of taxes that the government can collect to pass out to those who don’t want to work.
And Obama thinks this is necessary to “spread the wealth around” and Biden says it’s only being “patriotic”.
One unwavering rule I have always observed is The Middle Class Always Pays. Always. The fact that they’re falling for this flimflammery of a tax cut is pathetic.

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Higher taw rates for people earning more money are fair and in no way should they be considered a penalty. This is “penalty” is conservative rhetoric.
We pay taxes to maintain the “commons” ie roads schools, police and such. A business owner takes advantage of these “commons” to make money so he should pay for there use.
I own a small coffeehouse which means to say I own a espresso machine and a couple of refrigerators etcetera. If I am the only one working there I can go about 10-12 hours a day 7 days a week for a while, I know this because I did this after a few months it wears on you.
I own this machinery and rent a building, but with out employees to leverage these machines I really can’t make much money, so I need to hire some reasonably educated, people who can arrive to work via roads, and have safe dependable places to live. Every person I hire makes me more money.
I use more of the “commons” than they do, I use the “commons” to my advantage, I one day I hope to make enough money (250k) to pay higher taxes because that will mean that I am successful and at that point I will not feel bad that I pay my fair share, I love my country and would be proud the day my accountant tells me sorry dude but you are in the 250k bracket now!
Billy C.

Posted by: Billy | October 16, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Honestly… I’m at this moment rolling on the ground laughing my pants off.
This is the most bizarre election in American politics. We must thank McCain for made it so entertaining.
First our moose babe Palin, don’t know how to pronounce nuclear. Don’t know any newspaper, but now seems to reed the Financial Times. Winks, refuses to answers the questions.
The stop the campaign stunt. Thinking his party will vote for the bailout, these geezers voted against it.
The Letterman incident… very entertaining.
Can’t wait until the next SNL… This Joe the Plumber story will hunt McCain the rest of this election.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

“Honestly… I’m at this moment rolling on the ground laughing my pants off.”
Yeah, me too! When was the last time that we had a candidate that was friends with a domestic terroist, and that had a racist mentor for 20 years! Not to mention that he wouldn’t be able to pass a background check to work for the FBI!

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I don’t understand this post…it was always understood that he wanted to purchase the business. He never said he made over $250,000 a year…so why is this such a big deal.
The big deal is Obama’s answer to his question which was “spread the wealth” and he wants to make sure that people behind him have a chance…socialism.

Posted by: Bruce | October 16, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Say it ain’t so Joe. According to his hometown paper, the Toledo Blade, Joe isn’t a plumber.”
AHAHAHHAHAH…
Call the ambulance…I can’t breath!

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

“The bottom 40% who pay zero taxes but suck up government handouts aren’t going away – and Obama is going to increase their share of government goodies.”
Please reference Michigan for a real world view of the type economic downfall that these policies will cause.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Joe the Plummer is my new hero!
I love this guy. I love everything he said. What a great man!!
Basically Obama The Socialist wants to take Joe the Plummer of America’s money/profits that Joe America would’ve used to perhaps create more jobs or give out raises or bonuses to employees or create new products and services that would create even more jobs, raises, bonuses, etc….
Obama The Socialist wants to take that hunk of money and break it up into teeny weeny, itsy bitsy little bits so that more people can be in line for handouts.
John “I’m not Bush” McCain and Sarah Palin and Joe the Plummer are the hope and future of American exceptionalism.

Posted by: sheryl | October 16, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Why should companies who layoff Americans in favor of cheap labor overseas, get a break on their taxes? OBVIOUSLY THE CASH AINT TRICKLING DOWN at that point. I fear for how blind the Republicans are. Fear…”
Stop buying cheap junk from walmart that is made in China. You’re part of the problem.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“John “I’m not Bush” McCain and Sarah Palin and Joe the Plummer are the hope and future of American exceptionalism. ”
AHAHAHHAHA
Sorry, that is mean…
I respect your opinion. We may not agree on all the issues, Palin (don’t know how to pronounce nuclear), Joe the Plumber (which isn’t a plumber at all), but I still respect McCain for what he has done in the past for this country.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

All in favor of the Obama plan, vote ten times!

Posted by: T-Bird | October 16, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Take a look at what Obama and Ayers did while chairing the Annenburg Challenge. They wasted 49 million with no measurable results! You can’t just keep throwing money at the problem. It doesn’t work.

Posted by: Mack | October 16, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Not to mention that if you pay lower taxes now, you might be able to save money to buy that plumbing business

Posted by: jt | October 16, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

It’s amazing. Joe the Plumber is able to see that Socialism doesn’t work, but Ivy-league educated Obama seems to think it does. Common sense tells you it doesn’t. Socialism penalizes those who work hard, and rewards those who don’t! Eventually, there is no incentive to work hard, so nobody does, and then everybody suffers. This is so obvious! It can’t be argued. Socialism kills incentive! Capitalism rewards incentive!! Why on earth would anyone promote a system that kills incentive?
Seriously, why?

Posted by: Chairman Maubama | October 16, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

So under your definition then the rebate checks that bush has sent out twice were welfare checks?
This last one is a prime example, I paid no taxes last year and still got the $300 rebate.
This was a Bush plan and NOT the Democrats!

Posted by: Paolo | October 16, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

The theme from Obama seems to be that there is a limit to how much you can make without being forced to “spread the wealth” to early education programs and the like.
Forget Joe, I am thinking of a local restaurant that probably brings in $500,000 net a year. Raise their taxes 5%? I am thinking of the print shop that has 30-40 employees and brings in a several million a year…these are real job generators that will be impacted by Obama’s tax hikes. If it is an LLC, then it is taxed as an individual…there goes the extra employee or the expansion or the new machine…
You don’t get something for nothing, but raising taxes on these guys is going to hurt them…even if they are “big” The problem is Obama doesn’t tell us where the “small” ends and “big” begins…
More credits and loopholes for what the government decides is a beneficial activity, more complexity, more servitude…
Also, Obama’s capital gains cut for small businesses is nonsensical. Do plumbing businesses have a lot of stock and real estate investments?
Augh! He is smooth…just like a lawyer…shading the truth skillfully…spoonful of sugar…sleep peacefully…

Posted by: Wade | October 16, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

“I love my country and would be proud the day my accountant tells me sorry dude but you are in the 250k bracket now!
Billy C.”
But Billy, the point is, what if you decide you want to expand your business once you get to that point. You work your butt off to get to that point, but all of a sudden, you find it harder to open your second store now because your taxes are so high. Or, you might be able to open it, but hiring the adequate employees is harder because of your taxes. This might mean there is one less person in your town w/ a job, who you would otherwise have hired.
Put it this way. Once you work your butt off for years to get to the point where you can expand, you should be rewarded and encouraged to do so – not be penalized, which this indeed is. Believe me, even w/ tax rates as they are, you are more than funding those roads to get to your business.

Posted by: Chairman Maubama | October 16, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm


You just made your own education or lack thereof apparent.

Yes… in this case you’re righ.
I’m dutch, moved to the states to work as a developer 10 years ago.
I life in code, so forgive any faults in writing, it’s not my native language.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

BTW.
I studied electrical engineering.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Rachel – so you claim Joe the Plumber is ignorant if he chooses to pick the path where hard work will win – rather than some pandering hand out. I guess Joe’s vote is not so easily bought and sold as is yours.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I think Joe the Plumber has brought the election into focus and it is around the word “fair”.
Do we pick the version of “fair” that that says your merit is determined by your behavior?
Or do we pick the definition chosen by those who have time and again shown themselves not to like America.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Fact – the vast majority of small business owners in the United States make less than $250,000 per year. I own a small business and would be delighted to make over $250,000 per year, so I could do my patriotic duty and pay more taxes.
The Toledo Blade reports that Joe the Plumber is not a licensed plumber and there is no record of him completing or even attending any plumbing apprenticeship program. The company he works for and says he wants to buy, AW Newell Inc, appears to be a home-based business. A small business website reports that it is estimated to have two employees and total revenue of $100,000 per year. Divorce court records report that Joe’s income in 2006 was $40,000. Joe favors the flat tax and is opposed in principle to Social Security. Unless the Republicans shower money on Joe as a publicity stunt, his chances of making over $250,000 per year any time soon appear to be essentially zero. It seems that Joe the Plumber has a big problem telling the truth about his own business prospects. He would rather attack Obama’s economic and tax plans, which would actually benefit him and people like him across America.
- Jim Heaphy

Posted by: Jim Heaphy | October 16, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

It looks like Joe has no plumbers
license, and has be plumber helper over 10 years. and now owes more the $1,000 in back taxes. does not make good business sense, he wants to buy a business???????????????

Posted by: Wayne | October 16, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Obama and his plan are socialistic…he has communist leanings…his “father figure”/mentor was a member of the communist party…and the media keeps ignoring it, because they are so liberal…WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
……………………….
In his biography of Barack Obama, David Mendell writes about Obama’s life as a “secret smoker” and how he “went to great lengths to conceal the habit.” But what about Obama’s secret political life? It turns out that Obama’s childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist.
In his books, Obama admits attending “socialist conferences” and coming into contact with Marxist literature. But he ridicules the charge of being a “hard-core academic Marxist,” which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.
However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his “poetry” and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just “Frank.”
The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What’s more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations….
This is just a small exerpt…do your research. There is much more to this story…

Posted by: br10t | October 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

What about a doctor who earns more than $250,000 at a hospital and does not have his own practice. Is his tax rate the same as ‘Joe the Plumber’, someone who owns his own business under Obama’s plan?

Posted by: mary | October 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

I can’t wait for Obama to become present so I can get these free handouts everyone is talking about. You know, when he takes money from rich people and simply hands it out to everyone else. Thats gonna happen

Posted by: dp | October 16, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

You’re welcome John McCain, but don’t count on getting my vote next time around. I’m an Independent and if the Dems run a centrist candidate in 2012 instead of a Socialist with nasty associates, I may vote Dem next time around. But rest assured, you’ve got my vote this year. You’re a good man who will fight government waste instead of adding to the taxpayers’ burdens. God bless you, sir!

Posted by: marylou | October 16, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Why is it “fair” to take money from people who earned it and give it away in programs to people who did not earn it?
I was a life long democrat and think that Joe the Plumber involved us all in a Thoreau like moment. What has the US government been doing redistributing wealth from individuals?

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

marylou – I am with you. I’ll vote for a reformer over a socialist any day.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

america it’s time to see through obama’s economic fasod: 1) he trained acorn leaders, who in turn vigorously intimidated banks into issuing subprime loans to people with poor credit, which in turn ultimately was the cause of the financial crisis we find ourselves in, but 2) obama wants to take hard working american’s money and ‘spread the wealth around’ to others less fortunate. that’s not a capitalistic, american dream way of government. that’s a socialist way of doing things.

Posted by: marcus | October 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

light headed
Increasing the tax rate by 3% on people who make more than 250K is not going to eliminate anybody’s incentive to make money. You make more money, you keep more money. Sounds like good incentive to me.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

jock59801 – there are a lot of things that we can all swallow. The point remains, why is it fair to over tax some and not others?
I think this 95% free ride tax swindle is a cheap ploy to buy votes.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The mysterious “Frank” cited as a friend and adviser by Democratic president contender Barack Obama while he was growing up in Hawaii
has been identified as Frank Marshall Davis, a member of the old Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA.
The identification comes from Cliff Kincaid in his column, “Obama’s Communist Mentor,” which was made available on the Accuracy in Media website.
“Let’s challenge the liberal media to report on this,” he wrote in his column. “Will they have the honesty and integrity to do so?”
Kincaid, who earlier reported on Obama’s pending plan to ship $845 billion overseas to battle “global poverty” as evidence of his socialist leanings, said the newly revealed connection is even more worrisome.
“Obama’s communist connection adds to mounting public concern about a candidate who has come out of virtually nowhere, with a brief U.S. Senate legislative record, to become the Democratic Party frontrunner for the U.S. presidency,” he wrote.
In Obama’s book, “Dreams From My Father,” he repeatedly refers to his friend and adviser as “Frank.”
“The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What’s more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several Communist front organizations,” Kincaid said.
Kincaid noted Obama has admitted attending “social conferences” and seeing Marxist literature. “But he ridicules the charge of being a ‘hard-core academic Marxist,’ which was made by his colorful and outspoken 2004 U.S. Senate opponent, Republican Alan Keyes.”
He described the link as “ominous.”
“Decades ago, the CPUSA had tens of thousands of members, some of them covert agents who had penetrated the U.S. government. It received secret subsidies from the old Soviet Union,” Kincaid wrote.
He noted even Obama describes “Frank” has having “some modest notoriety once.”
Kincaid notes that a history professor in Houston reported that Davis “befriended” a family whose son was named Barack Obama, “who retracing the steps of Davis eventually decamped to Chicago.”
“It was in Chicago that Obama became a ‘community organizer’ and came into contact with more far-left political forces, including the Democratic Socialists of America…,” Kincaid wrote. “The SDS laid siege to college campuses across America in the 1960s, mostly in order to protest the Vietnam War, and spawned the terrorist Weather Underground organization.”
He also reported Kathryn Takara, a professor of Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, confirmed that Davis is the “Frank” in Obama’s book.
She did her dissertation on Davis, and wrote that he brought, “an acute sense of race relations and class struggle throughout America and the world” and that he openly discussed subjects such as American imperialism, colonialism and exploitation, according to AIM.

Posted by: Who is Obama | October 16, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Some of my friends have their own small company and they are not worried about the tax at all, they just make sure that they don’t earn more then 250,00,– income.
They invest much of the profits back into their company, training the personnel,take care that personnel is happy and content.
It’s about living within your means and invest the profits back in the company to stay competitive.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

It’s very hard for me to believe that starting a plumbing business is going to profit $250K in the next year or so…what kind of business connections does this guy have that he can make a profit of 250K and still be upset about taxes. It sounds like he doesn’t know much about what his expenses really are. I have a business and if I was profiting that much from it, I frankly would have to say I would be fine with paying a few more percentage points in taxes…I would just be so happy to pay a little more to actually make that much.

Posted by: Shelly | October 16, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

CLabs – that is a fair tale about living with in your means for small business people. They are motivated to succeed. If your definition of success says they have to make less than some arbitrary number you are forcing your will on them and wrecking the economy.
Is it fair for you to define how they should work? There is no fairness in you saying they cannot make over some number – which by the way sounds large today, but wait until we get Jimmy Carter sized inflation.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I make more than 250K per year and I am happy to pay more taxes to make the society a better and fair place.
Joe the Plumber is no where near this income yet.

Posted by: eva | October 16, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

This idea that we are only going to go after the upper 5% and that is somehow fair. It is just another form for discrimination and a way to divide the nation. 5% means 1 in 20. Lets create a new minority group that can be loathed by all – because they are successful.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

light headed
Nobody is saying “they cannot make over some number.” Yes, maybe their tax rate will go up 3%, but they will still be making more money.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

It’s easy to focus on fatcat CEOs as the vision of the 5% who get hit by Obama’s plans. But, it covers regular people who’d consider themselves middle class. I.e, double earner household w/2 kids, parents earning more than $250K –
since there was talk about DC last night, look to DC metro area – with a mix of govt, law firm, corporate, etc.
39% income tax – 97,500
7.5% SSI/FICA *2 -12,900
State tax (in VA, -14,000
TOTAL TAX 124400
NET 125,600 (50% )
Minimal cost of living annually 70,000 (bare bones budget, per EPI). Figure it’s more like 100,000 to account for actual mortgage payments vs rentals (EPI uses $1400 monthly housing, which in DC won’t get you much), better than minimal daycare, etc.
REM 25,6000 to be somehow split b/w retirement 401(k), college savings, emergency funds/savings, etc.
Vacations? No. Retail shopping? No. Dinners out? No. Savings? No. Medical emergency funds? No. Another 3% for taxes? only by dipping into retirement or college.
Better than others who aren’t working or making as much — in some ways yes, in other ways … it’s just as tight.
Isn’t it great to be “rich” in America

Posted by: Mdl | October 16, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

It’s not a fairy tale. It’s possible. They have a small IT company, doing a lot of consultancy. They just play it smart, invest a lot of the profits back into their company. Train their people.
I don’t see them driving in big SUV or Porshe.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

“To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” —Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Winghunter | October 16, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

For any given total tax burden, we have to decide what is a fair way to distribute it. If they wealthy pay a little more, which they can probably afford, then WE don’t have to pay as much. The Bush administration shifted more of the tax burden onto the middle class. Obama is suggesting we move it back to where it was in the 1990′s, when the economy was booming. If you still want more of the tax burden to fall on YOU, then vote for McCain.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Look, those making in the millions have all kinds of accountants and use tax loopholes to the point where they pay very little taxes, in fact in often cases less taxes than the average middle class family. That’s insane. It’s about time that we as Americans develop some sense of social justice and social responsibility. We’ve continued to perpetuate the idea that it’s every man/woman for him/herself. Is that what you really want to pass on to your children. And as for those of you who may be Christians, I would think that this idea would be appealing. The early church shared all that they had with each other (See Acts). For those who are non-Christians, I believe that we have a Human/Moral imperative to help each other for the good of all to build a strong nation.

Posted by: D. Vanderpool | October 16, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Again, why do you think it’s OK to penalize someone who works so hard? It just doesn’t make any sense!! Oh – and the guy working three jobs … first off, God bless him for not skirting responsibilities and asking for a hand out (like a lot of you, apparently). Secondly, that guy can work himself up to success just as easy as anyone else if he keeps working hard. My father used to work three jobs when I was little and we were very poor. Thankfully, his hard work turned into a steady job and now my parents do well, and I have my own successful life, thanks to my parents serving as hard-working role models!

Posted by: Chairman Maubama | October 16, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

“Christians, I would think that this idea would be appealing … non-Christians, I believe that we have a Human/Moral imperative to help each other for the good of all to build a strong nation.
Posted by: D. Vanderpool”
Right on! You just don’t know why. My wife and I work very hard to provide our family a good life, so nobody else has to. Then, after we take care of ourselves, we help take care of those in need through cash donations, donations of material items, and volunteering.
No offense but I want to be in charge of where my charity dollars go. I’m far more efficient (most of us are actually) than a beurocratic government is with such things!
Oh … did I mention I donate to my church too?

Posted by: Chairman Maubama | October 16, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

I see nothing wrong with taking a little more from those who can afford it, rather than taking more money from the less fortunate. It is my opinion that a three percent increase would be hardly noticed by the affluent class.

Posted by: Damien | October 16, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

MLD, your math is way way off!
They doin’t tax you 39% of 250,000 That would be unfair! Everyone is taxes at the same rate until a certain level. I don’t recall what they are, but everyone, i mean EVERYONE is taxed the same to to certain levels.
If same makes $50,000 and Joe makes 250,00, they are both taxes at the same lower rate for that same 50,00.. so he’s not taxed 125,000, that’s just not true.
In addition, he would only pay 3% for the amout he makes OVER 250,000! and with a tax cut in the first 200,000, he would probably see a net gain in his pocket. In other words, making $280,000 after deductions would be about $900 in additional taxes over the present rate.
Lets not forget that Bush lowered these rates from 39 to 36 ‘temporarilly’ in 2001. At the time, I thought it was unfair because there was very little cut in the lower income areas compared to a 3% savings to the most wealthy.
People need to understand taxes.. Good god! Know what you’re talking about before you do dumb calculations.
Add in that if joe makes 280,000 and is married and owns a home, he’ll get at least 20,000-25,000 in deductions, so if he made 280,000(which he doesn’t), he would only be taxed that higher rate on $5000-10,000… with the $1200 he’d save on the lower tax rates, and the $250 he would spend on the tax increaase, he’d still be better off than he was before, and better off than on Mccains plan.
I I before he hits that tax rate.

Posted by: tom | October 16, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Joe is an unlicensed plumber and owes back taxes. He makes around $40,000 a year and will benefit from Obama’s tax cut.
Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher may be related to convicted Keating fraud felon
Robert Wurzelbacher.
John McCain and Charles Keating were close.

Posted by: MrUniteUs | October 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Chairman,
Individual charitable donation is commendable, but history shows that this drops extremely low in times of economic turmoil and most charities do not survive soley from individual private donations. Taxes,although painful are necessary. If you think Obama’s tax plans aren’t sustainable, vote for McCain and let me know in 5 years (since he won’t be serving a 2nd term) if you’re in line at the local foodbank or that you can afford health care for your family off of the $5000 he plans on giving you. Good luck with that. I don’t mind paying some higher taxes if I know that I can feed my family and go to the doctor when we get sick.

Posted by: D. Vanderpool | October 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Damien says “I see nothing wrong with taking a little more …”.
That is the point. You cannot reason through why this is unfair, but you are willing to take the money because those people are faceless.
Here is some greedy rational that might fit in with your thinking. If we take from these people who are the engine of the economy, we are all headed for the dumpster. We need people who are motivated to succeed. Calling them some how less deserving or non-human because they are succesful makes no sense.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I paid more taxes than he makes money… Maybe McCain should give me a call instead. This guy is a joker.

Posted by: CLabs | October 16, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

light headed Joe
Nobody’s “incentive to succeed” is being taken away. Give it up.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

MrUniteUs – you cannot or are unwilling to see that Joe the plumber thinks of over taxing one segment of the country is unfair and counter productive.
Joe gets it and he is one who would benefit from the pandering scheme by Obama. It sounds like a line Hugo Chavez would put out there – 95% of the people will see no tax increase. There is no thought of why or to whom that money is going.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

MLD, besides you math be insanely off, you are describing me and my wife to a T. Fortunately, I am quite well off, nevertheless we are still getting a tax break under Obama (even though we don’t need it — between us, we pay about half the taxes you suggest). Just one of the many reasons I support him.

Posted by: MLE | October 16, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

To CLabs:
I live in the DC suburbs. I make about 85k and my wife makes 90k (175k combined income). We have a $650,000 home. By all accounts, this is a fairly good salary, probably considered slightly above middle class, even in VA. Even given the bush tax cuts over the past 8 years, we will STILL see a lower tax burden under Obama’s plan. And guess what? We currently pay a lower amount of taxes, by percentage, than I did 6 years ago making 48k and renting. Even on my small scale, it’s obvious that the more you make in this country, the more opportunities you have to take advantage of loopholes in the tax code to lower your payments. At the same time, we’re now better able to financially absorb the income tax burden placed on us than we were back then. The multimillionaires in this country have business and investment tax shelters that practically guarantee that they pay a fraction of the tax bracket in which they’re actually slotted. A $5 million earner with a good tax attorney will pay a far lower percentage of taxes than a guy trying to make rent on his $38,000 salary.
Distribution of wealth? Not even close!
Guys, take your adjusted gross income and plug it into the Tax Plan Calculator to see if Obama’s plan would benefit you.

Posted by: Viral | October 16, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

To tax more because you make more is socialistic. If the candidates were to say a flat tax of 10% and eliminate deductions, it might even be more fair.
Critisize him all you want but Joe makes sense.

Posted by: Whitehorse | October 16, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

jock59801 says “Nobody’s “incentive to succeed” is being taken away. Give it up.”
I guess Jock is missing the story. Joe the plumber stated quite openly that he feels that the Obama tax policy directly attacks his incentive to succeed.
Now, on your give it up phrase, the democratic machine would very much like us all to give it up. You might try calling me some names or threatening me. Those seem to be the current democratic techniques. I will never vote democratic again – and yes, I would benefit from the Obama tax pander.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

MLE says “I am quite well off, nevertheless we are still getting a tax break under Obama (even though we don’t need it”
Nice.

Posted by: light headed Joe Biden | October 16, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

It has been said, but for those who think that a higher tax rate is going to stop someone from buying a business or expanding, you don’t know jack about taxes.
A person making over $250K pays the same rate on the first 40K as someone who only makes 40K, the same rate on the next 60K as someone who makes 100K, and so on. The rate increases only on the dollars above certain points.
That means that someone making 250K would not pay 39% on all of the 250K, only on the amount above 250K. Thus if Joe or his business were to make 278K (now admitted to be completely false), the taxes at a 39% rate on 28K would be $840 more than at a 36% rate, or $1680 more than a 33% rate. That’s per year – and that doesn’t include Obama’s $1K credit.
Tell me that a person making $278K paying $680 more per year is some big bad socialist handout.
You have your choice – no tax cuts for the real middle class, bigger deficits, or letting people who won’t even miss that $680 shoulder just a little bit more of the burden.
I am so tired of ignorance and people who don’t understand how taxes work spouting off talking points that are not even in their own best interest. Let’s get educated and be reasonable and responsible.
The Joe thing never added up – it is impossible for the higher tax rate to preclude either an individual or a business making that kind of income or profit from expanding or purchasing a business. The amount of taxes is just too small to make a difference if the business is worth having. Now we start to get the truth – it was all a setup, a red herring, a lie.

Posted by: Matt | October 16, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Everyone pays more taxes as you make more. When I got a raise from 28K to 32 K, I not only paid more money, but also a higher percentage of taxes because I was in a new tax bracket. Earn more, pay more. The economy won’t survive if we dont do this. If not everyone will fall into another depression together. Get over yourselves and pay the taxes 5% group.

Posted by: kita | October 16, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

light headed Joe: “Joe the plumber stated quite openly that he feels that the Obama tax policy directly attacks his incentive to succeed.”
And everything Joe the plumber says is automatically the Truth? Apparently Joe isn’t even making that much.
If you were starting a new project where you expected to make $100,000, would you give up on it completely just because you could only make $97,000?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

light headed Joe
Well, I was only saying “give it up” on that one argument. Of course you shouldn’t give up on your candidate. If you agree with John McCains stands on the issues, then you should definitely vote for him. That’s how democracy works.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 16, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Have you seen all the news on Joe The Plumber today?
First off, turns out Joe doesn’t have a plumbers license, nor does the company he works for/wants to buy. Both of which are required in his County -
In addition, he has two tax liens against him – one for $1182 and a second for $1261, both dating back to early 2007. Owing all those back taxes and possibly getting his company shut down, he needs those tax breaks he’d get under Obama’s plan more than ever!
Boy, McCain sure knows how to pick a winner when it comes to GOP heroes (and VP running mates)!

Posted by: Viral | October 16, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Joe does not seem to have learned what socialism is, capitalism on the other hand is a system where our government is responsible for supporting a safe and reliable economic, social and political system, the more it is this way, the more opportunities we have, the more opportunities we have the richer we have the potential to become, the richer we are, the more responsibility we have to contribute to the system that makes it possible. There something very basic about paying taxes on what we are able to make based on a stable system that allows us to do so. Somehow in the process of building a taxation system it has become acceptable that those who benefit the most from the system, those who make the most money off of it, are somehow doing the rest of us below a big favor, while people like Joe the Plumber and so many millions of us put in the 10 to 12 hours a day to build the wealth for the nation.
I am totally glad that this example was brought up as it has raised an issue that needs to be discussed, this country is suffering an economic depression at this point in our history because the people who make it run daily have been left out to dry in the sun while the rich control what we hear is good and bad, it is time to stop that, in this election, we need to vote in our own interest and on that point, Joe is right, it is through good information and analysis of facts that we will do so. We have not done this in previous elections and it is time to get smart.

Posted by: mirasol | October 16, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

McCain can pick ‘ordinary Joe’ citizens as well as he can pick vice-presidents.

Posted by: ScottB | October 16, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Joe can join Sarah Palin in the ranks of McCain’s caracitures highlighted in the 2008 presidential election.

Posted by: Lori | October 16, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

I make less than 250,000 a year. I want the Obama tax breaks. I’m more interested in getting the extra money to pay my bills and get out of debt than in freak-outs over philosophical economic systems by people who sound like they have lots of time on their hands and don’t need a tax break. I don’t have that luxury. Obama is definitely in touch with me. I like the idea of some extra money in my pocket and who knows maybe after I pay my bills I might be able to afford some of those widgets the people with businesses making over 250k are selling, right now I can’t. The entire year I’ve bought one new dress and it was $20, so cheaply made it’s already falling apart, luckily I can sew, and apparently lots of people are in my situation because retail sales are down and look bleak even for the holiday season. And right now too much of my money is going to my medical bills getting two of my prescription pills (with insurance) costs me $70 a month, if I didn’t need them I wouldn’t take them. I tried skipping a week once and ended up missing two days of work that week. Obama looks like he’ll do right by me on health care too. I am voting Obama all the way.

Posted by: I make less than 250k | October 16, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

If Joe’s profit is 278K a year, his monthly net income is almost 17K and the tax he would have to pay more a year with Obama’s plan is short of $800 — or $2.30/day which is about the cost of a latte. I think Joe can afford sharing a latte with a friend or customer if he is making this kind of money!
If Joe invests 10K a month of his net of 17K, he can retire at age 45 with 2 million in the bank — or wait until he is 65 with 12 million in the bank.
I would say, with or without the $800/year in increased taxes, Joe is the American Dream.
What I have heard is that Joe’s potential business is making more like 130K a year in revenue–not net profit and I assume he has expenses. In any event–Joe the Plumber will get to keep more with senator Obama’s tax cuts than he would under McCain.
Even if his revenue was 278K, this would be true, because of other tax cuts and the deductions he can make.
Joe is misinformed and we are being mislead, and the lack of critical journalism is bad.

Posted by: samcla | October 16, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

BTW.
I studied electrical engineering.
these morons dont have a clue what a BSEE degree is… but i do. ;)

Posted by: bah | October 16, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Don’t be fooled. As recent as July Obama said he would provide a tax cut to those making less than $75K. Maria Bartiromo on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” asked, “Who should pay more and who should pay less?” Answer: “I would not increase taxes for middle class Americans and in fact I want to provide a tax cut for people who are making $75,000 a year or less,” he said.
That’s a slick way of saying everyone over $75K is going to take a tax hike. When’s the last time a democrat in the white house didn’t raise taxes? That’s the power base. Run for election with promises of providing social benifits and re-election with promises of increasing those benifits. Simple.
An enormous percentage of taxes are payed by a minority of Americans: 1% Pay Greater Dollar Amount in Income Taxes to the Federal Government than the Bottom 90%
The Top 1% of taxpayers pay 39% of all taxes.
The Top 5% of taxpayers pay 50% of all taxes.
The Top 25% of taxpayers pay 86% of all taxes.
The evil Bush tax cuts look pretty good for EVERYONE. The guy making $30K in fact got almost an extra 1.5 years of annual salary over the past 8-years and that’s significant.
After Bush Tax cuts
Single making 30K – tax $4,500
Single making 50K – tax $12,500
Single making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 125K – tax $31,250
Reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts:
Single making 30K – tax $8,400
Single making 50K – tax $14,000
Single making 75K – tax $23,250
Married making 60K – tax $16,800
Married making 75K – tax $21,000
Married making 125K – tax $38,750
About a 2x increase in taxes.

Posted by: Eric - San Francisco | October 16, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

McCain has stated as President he would never sign a bill with “earmarks”. The Wall Street bailout bill had many “earmarks”, and McCain endorsed and voted for this bill. What will McCain really do as President when a similar emergency bill containing “earmarks” awaits his signature? Do you really think McCain can “maverick” his will on your state Senator or Representative for your pet project?

Posted by: CAB | October 16, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Eric – San Francisco
Where did you get your figures from?
The quote from Obama is correct but the idea that everyone making 75k a year or more is going to get a tax hike is false. the people making 75k to 250k per year will not get a take hike their taxes will remain the same as they are right now. I fall in this range and I looked it up under neither Obama or McCain will my taxes go up or down. Obama’s tax plan has always been to return the tax rates to what they were under Bill Clinton and now McCain is trying to say that is what his new plan is. who is lying? I don’t know. But I do have a hard time believing McCain is going to use the same tax plan that Clinton did. Like I said I don’t know who is lying, though.
Plaese let me know what your source is though eric.

Posted by: Josh | October 16, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

“Well, I mean, quite honestly, why should they be penalized for being successful?” Wurzelbacher asked. “I mean, that’s what you’re telling me. That’s what it sounds like you’re saying. That’s wrong. Because you’re successful, you have to pay more than everybody else? We all live in this country. It’s a basic right. And Obama wants to take that basic right and penalize me for it, is what it comes down to.” – Joe The Plumber
Just because you make a lot of money does not mean you are successful. President Bush before becoming President made more a quarter of a million a year and so far he has not been successful at anything. Some people make this much per year because their rich gandpa or daddy give them a huge salary and fancy job title but they may not do anything. Enron’s corporate heads made huge amounts of money. Would Joe the plumber call them successful. What about the guy who was the CEO of Washington Mutual made close to 20 million in his less than 3 weeks as CEO before WaMu went belly up. Would Joe the plumber call him successful.
Joe forget being a plumber you should become a comedian.
Coming to a comedy club near you Larry The Cable Guy with special guest Joe The Plumber

Posted by: Josh | October 16, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I am certainly not any kind of financial expert but I do know from personal experience that if you own your own business your tax breaks outweigh your taxable income. My husband owned his own construction busines up until a feww months ago. Every year are taxes stated that we made between 20-25 K per year. Due to the instability of our economy he couldn’t rely on people needing home repairs so he got a job making 45K per year. We are barely making it on his salary. The point I am trying to make is that when you own your own business there are so many write offs with that business that your so called income is way less then what you actually make. The majority of people who make more the 250K per year own their own businesses and surely aren’t paying taxes on all that they make because so much of it is a write off.

Posted by: bridget | October 16, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

This is very good explanation of Small Business Tax that was big discussion between Obama and McCain. Actually what Obama said is pretty true. McCain claims not true.
NOTE EXPLAINS WELL AMOUNT OF MONEY OVER 250,000 AND AMOUNT YOU ACTUALLY THE INCREASE ON. IS NOT FULL AMOUNT. READ WHOLE ARTICLE. WRITTEN BY EXPERTS MONEY NEWS
In speech after speech, presidential candidate John McCain hammers on the claim that his rival Barack Obama will raise taxes on many small businesses.
At the debate on Wednesday night, McCain said, “The small businesses that we’re talking about would receive an increase in their taxes right now.”
More typically he has said: “What [Obama] hasn’t told you is that he would tax half of the income of small businesses in America,” a line used in La Crosse, Wisc., last week.
Should small business owners fear for their wallets if Obama is elected? Not the vast majority, business and tax experts say.
To make its claim, according to a McCain spokesman, the campaign counts as a small-business owner any taxpayer who files a Schedule C, E or F – the forms used to report gains and losses from business ventures and farms.
Using that definition and citing IRS data, the campaign notes that “56.8% of total small business income is earned by businesses in the top two rates, which Barack Obama has pledged to raise.”
It’s true that Obama has proposed raising taxes on the top two income rates.
But there are three main problems with McCain’s charge.
What is a small business?
First, it relies on a broad definition of what counts as a small business, including everyone who files a Schedule C, E and F.
But most people who file those forms don’t run a business for a living: Those forms are also used to report income from freelance and consulting work, real-estate rentals, and most other non-salary sources.
For example, McCain and Obama both file Schedule C returns, thanks to their book royalties – but they hardly should be considered small business owners.
In 2005, there were 21.5 million Schedule C returns filed, according to the IRS.
A more realistic definition of small businesses turns up far fewer firms. The Small Business Administration estimates that there were 6 million small businesses in 2005, as measured by those with fewer than 500 employees and with staff on the payroll other than the owner.
Who pays?
Second, even using the broad definition of small business that McCain likes, very few owners would see their own taxes rise.
That’s because the lion’s share of taxable income comes from a small number of wealthy businesses. Out of 34.7 million filers with business income on Schedules C, E or F, 479,000 filers fall into the top two brackets, according to an analysis of projected 2009 filings by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
The other 34.3 million – or 98.6% – would be unaffected by Obama’s proposed rate hike.
That includes Joe “The Plumber” Wurzelbacher, whom McCain invoked nearly two dozen times at the debate Wednesday night to illustrate the plight of the average worker and small business owner.
“Joe wants to buy the business that he has been in for all of these years … he wanted to buy the business but he looked at your tax plan and he saw that he was going to pay much higher taxes,” McCain said.
In an interview afterward with WTOL, Wurzelbacher acknowledged that he’d still like to eventually buy the plumbing company he works for but that he wouldn’t yet be hit by higher taxes.
“I want to set the record straight: Currently I would not fall into Barack Obama’s $250,000-plus,” he said. “But if I’m lucky in business and taxes don’t go up then maybe I can grow the business and be in that tax bracket – well, let me rephrase it. Hopefully, that tax won’t be there.”
Few owners are that lucky in business. In a member survey conducted late last year, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) found that only 14% of respondents said they had $200,000 or more in annual income.
As Tax Policy Center fellow Len Berman recently told Fortune Small Business: “Most owners of small businesses have small incomes.”
What gets taxed?
Third, even if you’re one of the rare business owners making enough money to be affected by Obama’s proposed tax increases, you still won’t see a big hike in your tax bill.
McCain’s claim that Obama “will increase taxes on 50% of small business revenue” – the line he used in the second presidential debate – is incorrect because of how income is taxed.
If a business owner falls into the top bracket, that doesn’t mean that all of his or her income is taxed at the highest level.
For example: If a small-business owner makes $210,000 in taxable income, he edges into the 33% bracket, one of the two top tax rates that Obama would like to raise.
But he would pay the higher tax only on the amount that exceeds the cutoff – in 2007, the two top tax rates applied to single filers with income of $160,850 or more and joint filers with income of at least $195,850. As a single filer, this business owner would see his federal taxes increase $1,475 under Obama’s plan, which calls for raising the 33% tax rate to 36%.
“While Obama does favor raising the top two rates, the quote is not true because not all the small business income of those in the top two rates is taxed at the 33% and 35% rates,” said Gerald Prante, a senior economist at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.
The bottom line: McCain’s claim only works by using an overly broad definition of what counts as a “small business” – and even with that definition, fewer than 2% of business owners would be hit by Obama’s proposed rate increase. For those who are affected, the increase would be levied only on a part of their earnings, not all of them.

Posted by: Sharonklim | October 16, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

I’m watching the political action on CNN and I can’t help laughing at people like Joe the plumber who keep complaining about having to pay more taxes for being successful when in fact small businesses have been rewarded for years with tax credits that normal families don’t get. A lot of business owners take advantage of that every year and add everything they can think of to their “business” expenses so I certainly won’t feel sorry for that kind of greedy Republican supporters.
As far as McCain’s comment (on the last debate) about the Canadian health system goes, Canada spends less in average per person than the US and Canadian citizens’ life expectancy is higher so go figure what that call to blind patriotism was all about!

Posted by: Canadian Observer | October 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

According to Obama’s definition, me and my wife are ‘rich.’ Even though we work 13-14hr days and commute 3hrs a day. We work hard so that we won’t have to in our ‘golden years’ and so we can provide our children the opportunities in life we never had. Until 5 yrs ago, I’ve always held at least 2 jobs and usually held 3.
We do not own a business we simply work VERY hard and take pride in our work. Neither of us ever got or took a handout from the government or anyone else, however both of us started out as the lowest paid government employees on the GS scale, we both started out as E1s in the military when we were 18 and after 22 years of combined military service, we’ve worked our way into becoming “rich” (Obama’s definition not ours).
So if I understand Obama’s tax plan, now were simply supposed give even MORE (we are already highly taxed as is) of our hard earned money to those who didn’t/don’t work as hard as we do? Why? If you listen to liberals, it’s because “it’s the fair thing to do,” when was life ever fair? Where was my handout when I was living off of Raman noodles and PB&J sandwiches because we couldn’t make the ends meet while we were in the military? We wanted more, we wanted a better life for ourselves and our children, so we simply worked HARDER.
America is the land of the free and home of the brave, it is what YOU make of it. It is NOT the land of entitlements, socialistic money transfers, or handouts. I do not begrudge my fellow American citizens a hand up, but never…NEVER a hand out. That just won’t do.
If you feel you ‘deserve more money,’ then work harder and/or get another job. It’s quite simple to me…

Posted by: Just another "rich" worker bee | October 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Although Joe the plumber gave me a good laugh, “Just another “rich” worker bee” is pretty funny too.
According to that person, the couple works 14 hours a day and commute 3 hours for a total of 17, which leaves 7 hours to sleep, take a shower, prepare meals and eat. And here he is pretending he wants to provide for his children! Do you go by that schedule all year??? I mean common!

Posted by: Canadian Observer | October 19, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

If Joe is making $250,000 a year then he is doing extremely well. I’m not shedding a tear for him. The average American makes a mere fraction of that. I’m sure his accountant will find plenty of nice deductions and tax shelters for him. So he’ll be just fine.

Posted by: cj | October 21, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

At $200,000 for a single and $250,000 ceiling for a two income married couple, we may see 2009 as the year of divorces if Obama gets elected.

Posted by: Kirby | October 21, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

To the Canadian Observer:
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m saying. I’ve been working this very schedule for 4 years now, my Wife started working the same schedule this year.
As I previously posted, it’s nothing new to me, I’ve always had several jobs to ensure the financial security of my family. We work hard so our children can have opportunities we never had and so our financial security is rock solid when we retire. What about that is funny to you?
You see, my family isn’t afraid to work to achieve a better life for ourselves and for our future security, I don’t burden my fellow citizens with laziness. We don’t sit around asking each other, why isn’t life fair, nor do we believe laziness should be rewarded with socialistic tendencies.
As I previously stated, it’s very simple, if you want it…go out and WORK for it, don’t expect a handout.
It’s a shame others don’t share our view point on the ethic of hard work, if others did the greatest country on earth would be even greater.

Posted by: Just another "rich" worker bee | October 22, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

The point is that Obama’s tax increases WILL affect at least some small business owners adversely. I could use the “me first” attitude and say that I am voting for Obama because I personally would be a tax break from him. Instead, I am voting to put my “country first,” and protect small businesses like these:

Posted by: Pam | October 22, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

This is so silly… basically it all comes down to 2 points of view… the “trickle down theory” rep idea of economics and the “build from the ground up theory” dem idea of economics. I believe McCain chose well using “Joe the Plumber” as his example, who knows as well as a plumber what really trickles down….

Posted by: rebecca | October 24, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Let me see. A tax break for the middle class which would increase spending, grow the economy and help to raise people into the middle class so they could also add to the economic success is a socialistic idea. Right? But, a tax break for Exxon is what? That is not socialistic. That is what? Trickle-down. Of course, Exxon is going to make more jobs for the middle class. Then, with Exxon so wealthy, why are people being laid off in this economy? Do all these socialist-idea folks think that our tax system is socialistic? If you use their logic, of course it is. Tell us a better way. I know, no taxes. Starve the beast. It’s the Republican way.

Posted by: Marge | October 28, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

“Let me see. A tax break for the middle class which would increase spending, grow the economy and help to raise people into the middle class so they could also add to the economic success is a socialistic idea.”
It never works.
Jobs will be lost.

Posted by: drjohn | October 28, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

You’re all ignoring Obama demanding businesses make further “meaningful” contributions to their health plans above wht’a present now. You also ignore the increase in FICA. You also all ignore the AMT.
Obama’s plan is a massive tax increase, and for a lot more people than he admits.
Already it’s down to $150,000.
That’s not where it would end.

Posted by: drjohn | October 28, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

When you drive out small business with tax punishments, the large corporations dominate the market. Just the way Democrats like obama want it, when they, for example, give tax breaks to oil companies. So much for the little guy.

Posted by: myron | October 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

alot of you talk about losing job with the obama plan what do you think is going on with the BUSH plan right now and for the last 8 yrs. LOST JOBS EVERY WHERE.. Bring in McCain and the same will happen more lost jobs.. we need a chage for the better not for the worst.. How are they going to punish the rich most rich people have CPA’s that hide there money anyway.

Posted by: Sam | October 29, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Sorry Josh – My post was deleted by ABC. Look up the taxfoundation online for answers.
And why do over 70% of Americans own homes when 40% of Americans pay $0 Fed Income Tax? And why are we in this mess? Tough questions?

Posted by: Eric - San Francisco | October 30, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

This race is getting pretty ugly. The world’s watching, and 84% say Obama for President. Why? Because his ideas are more likely to work in today’s day and age! Economically he’s right, by giving tax cuts, consumers are able to attin more goods and sercives, which drives commerce and business. To fund an enormous budget while saddled with debt… you must either borrow or raise taxes, but Obama’s raising it relatively minimally(3%) on the more financially robust of Americans. Where is John McCain going to get the funds to service his budget, one that has spiralled out of control through the incumbent, George W. Bush?
In terms of foreign policy, the world has become a more level playing field. More countries are now armed with nuclear weapons while others are on the brink. The confrontational style that has pervaded current US foreign policy may prove ineffective in today’s world, as presently the US faces forces possessing increased potency and resolve. Big stick policy won’t work in today’s world! We need a new type of diplomacy, one that reduces international insecurity and doesnt heighten it.
Pretty ugly, dirty and divisive race! Very unbecoming of the world’s “example of civility”. This is what has become of the socio- political state of the USA? Things have changed drastically, and not for the better either. A new brand is necessary, the world’s future depends on it…

Posted by: The world is concerned... | November 2, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Joe the Plumber says:
- He’s going to buy his employer’s plumbing company
- Which makes over $250K
- So his taxes will increase under Obama’s plan
Except that
- He isn’t going to buy the company
- Which doesn’t make over $250K anyway
- And his taxes would actually be lower under Obama’s plan
Not to mention that his name isn’t Joe, and he is not technically a plumber.
He should be a laughingstock, but instead McCain/Palin have made him a centerpiece of their campaign. He even speaks and takes questions at their rallies.
They must really think their supporters are idiots. And judging from the wildly positive reactions he elicits, maybe they are right.

Posted by: Bellingman | November 3, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

And under an Republican-sponsored plan to suppress votes in Ohio, JTP would have been purged from the voter rolls because his name was misspelled on his registration.
It’s a bad sign for your party when your goal is for as few people to vote as possible. Republicans, take a hard look in the mirror. If you like what you see, you must be blind.

Posted by: Bellingman | November 3, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

It is NOT the land of entitlements, socialistic money transfers, or handouts. I do not begrudge my fellow American citizens a hand up, but never…NEVER a hand out. That just won’t do.

Posted by: ClubPenguin | July 2, 2010, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.