LA NOW Prez on Palin: ‘America, This is What a Feminist Looks Like’
Shelly Mandell, the president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women introduced Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin over the weekend in California, speaking not on behalf of NOW but "as an individual, as a woman’s rights activist for 30 years who has worked for all those years to see this day."
Going through her feminist bona fides — the International Women’s Year, the Equal Rights Amendment, Geraldine Ferraro — Mandell said she is "proud to support Sarah Palin, a woman who will fight for women’s rights … a woman who will, Lord knows, shake things up."
"Make no mistake," Mandell said. "I’m a life-long Democrat … I don’t agree with Gov. Palin on several issues." And yet, she said, "I know Sarah Palin cares about women’s rights, she cares about equality, she cares about equal pay, and as Vice President she will fight for it. She cares about our children and she cares about women’s lives. She’s an athlete and she knows what Title Nine did for girls like her."
"It is an honor to call her sister," Mandell said as she handed the microphone over to Palin, who would accuse Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., of "palling around with terrorists."
“America," Mandell said, "this is what a feminist looks like."
California’s NOW President, Patty Bellasalma, issued a statement saying that the "National Organization for Women Political Action Committee (NOW PAC) joined with many allied organizations representing a broad and diverse cross-section of U.S. women to endorse Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Both have long records of service, fighting to improve the rights of women, families, and working people. From voting rights to equal pay legislation to authoring and funding the Violence Against Women Act, it was clear to NOW PAC that the Obama/Biden ticket represents the best team for the kind of future we envision for women and girls.
"A member and officer of the Los Angeles NOW chapter, Shelly Mandell, recently introduced Governor Sarah Palin at an event in Carson, California. Ms. Mandell was speaking as an individual and was not authorized to represent NOW, the NOW PAC or LA NOW in any capacity in connection with a federal candidate endorsement. As NOW President Kim Gandy said upon Palin’s selection , ‘Not every woman supports women’s rights.’ The use of Shelly Mandell’s Los Angeles NOW title was apparently intended to mislead the public, and indeed has resulted in local television outlets and internet reports misstating that LA NOW has “endorsed” Sarah Palin or that she has a record of supporting women’s rights. This in fact is not the case.
"As President of California NOW and as a member and officer of Los Angeles NOW, I can assure you that there is no local or state affiliate of NOW, including LA NOW, which endorses or supports the McCain/Palin ticket. John McCain and Sarah Palin oppose many of the rights and freedoms we have fought for throughout NOW’s 42 years, and we will not be pushed back to the days of back-alley abortions, forced pregnancies, and pay discrimination without remedy. Nor will we let the media distractions deter our members and activists from our organizing for freedom and equality for all women, putting our hopes and our dreams, our hard work and our hard-earned money, behind a proven team for women: the next President of the United States – Barack Obama – and his running mate, longtime friend and ally of women, Sen. Joe Biden With equal ferocity we will fight to protect young women by defeating Proposition 4 and to keep bigotry and discrimination out of our state constitution by defeating Proposition 8 here in California."
– jpt
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
A republican votes republican, well, what a shocker. Film at 11.
NOW supports Obama!
The dow sinks 500 and McCain-Palin want to talk about what happened when Obama was 8. Clueless, as always.
Posted by: memyself | October 6, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Fascinating. First NOW breaks with their policy of not endorsing a presidential candidate and they do so BECAUSE a woman is on the ticket and they want her to lose. And now this. Which is more stunning?
Posted by: Judasmac | October 6, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
NOW is very interesting, they only support certain women, not all women. My message to them, listen “SWEETIE”, if women don’t support women. . . men certainly won’t support them. When you discuss bigotry, lets talk about how liberal women treat conservative women.
Posted by: Margaret | October 6, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
NOW is very interesting, they only support certain women, not all women. My message to them, listen “SWEETIE”, if women don’t support women. . . men certainly won’t support them. When you discuss bigotry, lets talk about how liberal women treat conservative women.
Posted by: Margaret | October 6, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
All I can say to Shelly Mandell is, look before you leap. Sarah Palin is not Hillary Clinton. Sarah has never supported women in any way. If you decide to support someone get your facts straight.
Posted by: geevill | October 6, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
John McCain OPPOSED the LILLY LEDBETTER FAIR PAY ACT.
John McCain and his not-ready-for-prime-time running mate believe that woman are not capable of making moral choices when it comes to control over their own body.
If you want a president who treats woman as children, you should definitely vote for John McCain.
Some background on Lilly Ledbetter:
Of all the appalling decisions the Roberts Court issued last year, one of the worst was the 5-4 ruling in Ledbetter v. Goodyear, which gutted the equal-pay provisions of the Civil Rights Act and overturned a decades-old employment-law precedent.
The plaintiff, Lilly Ledbetter, worked for nearly two decades at a Goodyear Tire plant in Gadsden, Alabama. She brought an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint against Goodyear after she discovered that for years she had been paid less than male co-workers with the same job. The justices ruled that employees can only file a wage-discrimination complaint within 180 days of when the payroll decision was made.
After the Supreme Court issued its decision, which leaves women and minorities in Ledbetter’s situation with no recourse, congressional Democrats pledged to pass legislation that would give employees two years to file a complaint, in accordance with the law before the Supreme Court issued its decision.
Posted by: John | October 6, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
It is a Pandora’s Box If they start attacking Obama. What about Cindy McCain’s past drug use, what about Cindy flirting with McCain when he was still married to his first wife. What about Charlie Black? What about Keating five? What about McCain association with Phil Gramm?
McCain has a lot to answer for and the gloves are off now. Read about Phil Gramm’s involvement in the current mortgage crisis and you’ll be sick.
Posted by: Owen | October 6, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Ahh get back in the intellectual prison ladies. Don’t DARE you think for yourselves. Leave your opinions and critical thinking to the “experts.” Now, go away. And wait until we TELL you before you do something or attempt to think for yourself!
Posted by: hmn | October 6, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
“Pascal” – must be you be offensive? Take some time to post a thoughtful comment rather than closing your eyes and picking a random Obamanite assault line. You forgot to add that Palin is stupid or kills animals or something equally silly.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 6, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
I find it interesting and refreshing that an officer of NOW thinks for herself and does not toe the line.
We need more of this.
Good article Jake! Hard to find this kind of stuff thourghly reported anywhere else.
Posted by: smith | October 6, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
McCain’s course correction reflects a growing case of nerves within his high command as the electoral map has shifted significantly in Obama’s favor in the past two weeks.
“It’s a dangerous road, but we have no choice,” a top McCain strategist told the Daily News. “If we keep talking about the economic crisis, we’re going to lose.”
Now I call that fighting for America McCain…Empty Suite…
Posted by: beck | October 6, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I liked Gov. Palin’s quote from Mad Albright: “There is a special place in hell for a women who don’t stick up for other women.”
Posted by: Captain America | October 6, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Does this mean Rush Limbaugh will begin his news on Palin with the audio clip of Ms. Mandell saying “We’re fierce, we’re feminist and we are in your face.”
Posted by: ricky | October 6, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
this woman is as dumb and self serving as Mccain.
never mind transparent.
Posted by: dl | October 6, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Looks like McCain/Palin are getting desperate with their ridiculous assertions against Barack Obama. How McCain can be so absolutely irresponsible and reckless as to nominate Sarah Palin for V.P. is just to selfish to contemplate. He is willing to risk this Country’s future to pander to women who he thought felt disenfranchised so he chooses Palin who is absolutely unqualified to be our V.P. We have had to live with Darth Vader for the past 8 years as V.P., and now McCain gives us Betty Boop!!!
Posted by: geecee | October 6, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Given the disgraceful misogyny directed at Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin during this campaign by Democrats and certain members of the media for the sin of challenging Barack Obama, women’s groups continued blind support of Obama/Biden makes them look more and more like battered wives.
Posted by: bct | October 6, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
ANOTHER ISSUE THAT SHOULD BE OF CONCERN TO WOMAN AND ALL AMERICANS IS THAT OF SOCIAL SECURITY.
John McCain wants workers to be able to DIVERT some of their Social Security contributions to private accounts, the SAME contributions that currently fund your mother or grandmother’s Social Security checks.
Diverting funds currently paying for Social Security checks into private accounts will have two results:
1. The Social Security Trust Fund will go into technical default SOONER.
2. According to the law, when the trust fund goes into technical default, the outgoing checks will be reduced to match the incoming contributions.
The result of diverting money away from the trust fund is that the AMOUNT OF THE CUT WILL BE LARGER.
To be blunt:
John McCain and the Republican party believe that Social Security is socialism.
Therefore he wants to do everything he can to destroy this program that provides food and shelter for our retired parents and grandparents.
Posted by: John | October 6, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Captain America, after making up the quote “I told Congress, ‘thank’s but no thanks’” and the discovery that her Reagan quote was from an attack on Medicare, Palin cannot even get the quote from Albright correct?
Posted by: ricky | October 6, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
So this is what Republicans have been reduced to: ‘vote for me because I’m a woman’. This is the kind of nonsense Democrats have been famous for; what the heck is wrong with the GOP?
Posted by: 1percenter | October 6, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“National Organization for Women Political Action Committee (NOW PAC) joined with many allied organizations representing a broad and diverse cross-section of U.S. women to endorse Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Both have long records of service, fighting to improve the rights of women, families, and working people.”
Maybe I’m missing something, but what is Obama’s “long record of service?”
Posted by: no thanks obama | October 6, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
LOL!
Feminists hate Palin and Palin fans hate feminists.
Posted by: megan | October 6, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
It’s like seeing the political landscape realign. I wonder if history will judge President Clinton and Hillary Clinton for reversing a decades alliance between women’s groups and the Democratic Party.
The more McCain distorts John Lewis’ support for a McCain administration or a Jewish organizing group tries to pull together an event in New York so that Palin and Clinton can share a stage, the more people are seeing that McCain puts the campaign first and the truth last.
Posted by: Genna | October 6, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
To “No Thanks”:
Right off the top of my head:
1. Obama supported the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. John McCain to Lilly Ledbetter: “TOUGH LUCK”
2. Obama opposes the McCain plan to DIVERT the money currently paying for Social Security checks for our mothers and grandmothers. For demographic reasons there are many more woman than men receiving social security.
Posted by: John | October 6, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
WOW!! The tolerant and all do goody left has spoken, right pascal? As for the LA NOW babe….be careful cause you could recieve a drive-by from Dikes on Bikes over your endorsement of the RIGHT!
Posted by: commrat72 | October 6, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Not to quibble with Ms. Mandell, but I bet if Katie Couric had asked Palin if she supported Title Nine she would have drawn a blank stare before Palin said, well I read all of the titles put in front of me.” If Charlie Gibson had asked her is she supported Title Nine she would have asked “In waht way, Charlie.” And I bet Alaska had high school girls’ basketball long before Title IX. We also know what stupidity sounds like Ms. Mandell.
Posted by: ricky | October 6, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I hope everyone captures “commrat72″‘s post and sends it to Ms. Mandell.
Posted by: ricky | October 6, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
America, this is what a pretty face will get you in life. So, keep playing the gender card and you too can be a political strategy.
No wait, that was misogynistic of me. Let me be PC: America, this is what gender equality is all about. Feminists have succeeded to get a woman playing second fiddle behind a man. No, no, no that’s not right either.
America, vote for Palin because she’s a woman and it’s about time a woman was president.
Posted by: Don | October 6, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
“America,” Mandell said, “this is what a feminist looks like.”
——————
What exactly is the message here? The future for American women is to be stupid and wink a lot? Make no mistake, Sarah Palin may be politically savvy, but from what I can tell, from an intellectual standpoint, she is a borderline idiot.
She does not provide a good example for my own daughter, who, though much younger than Palin, actually is capable of speaking in complete sentences and reads. Palin does not support women’s rights and does not support equal pay for equal work.
Sarah Palin is not what “feminism” or even American women look like. She is just what Sarah Palin looks like and is.
Posted by: mary | October 6, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Obama has opened up a nearly 100-point electoral-vote lead, according to NBC’s new map. Obama now has a 264-174 advantage over McCain, up from his 212-174 edge last week. It’s over.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 6, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Shelly Mandell has the courage of her convictions. As a life-long Democrat, I’m with her. I can’t do alot to affect the outcome in my state, but I’m from Missouri and I can campaign there.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 6, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
How ANYONE with a brain could support BO (which is a good name for a person who stinks)is beyond me. As the little child said “but Mommmy, the emperor’s not wearing any clothes!”
No matter how much bs rhetoric he spouts, he still comes off as a PIMP–”sure girl, work as much as you want, bring that money in”. That is NOT women’s rights!
Posted by: lilypotter | October 6, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Networks are now focus on the economy.
The economy is the October surprise. We can’t simply “turn the page”.
Obama should hold a press conference on the situation going on in Wall Street. Force McCain to respond on the economy.
Posted by: Vanessa | October 6, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
That group should be called the National Organisation of Democratic Women since they have no interest in supporting women of other political persuasians. Thankheavens at least one of them is broadminded enough to stand up for all women. That took guts because the liberal/left feminists are still stuck in their dungarees of the 1970s and are thoroughly nasty if someone doesn’t agree with their smug,
self-satisfied political correctness.
Posted by: Janet | October 6, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Hillary is the face of modern feminism. Get real. Palin is the face of beauty pageants, weather girls, and bogus talent competitions everywhere. Palin is pretty but stupid. She is not any where near the feminist face of women. Please.
Posted by: Jillian | October 6, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Love the “feminists” who compare Clinton to Palin. The two of them have about as much in common as Meryl Streep and Paris Hilton do. What an insult to Clinton.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 6, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
if women don’t support women. . . men certainly won’t support them. When you discuss bigotry, lets talk about how liberal women treat conservative women.
I have also thought we are own worst enemies. We tend to be secretive, territorial, overprotectve and nastily overcompetitive. My worst managers were women who felt compelled to backstab their female colleagues. This is our nasty litle secret. The ideal of femminism exists only in fantasy. And this is why men will never treat us equally until we learn to communicate the way they do.
Posted by: sammi | October 6, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
This group should change to Democrats/Liberals National Women Organization because obviously they are far from representing and supporting a Republican woman. that’s shameful. Please change the name. I bet they’re going to boot Mendall out of the organization soon. Obama’s lifelong supports for women?? that’s wrong it’s only his 143 days as US senate support for women.
Posted by: hannah | October 6, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
We sure hear a lot from Palin these days.
Where’s McCain? Is he dead?
Posted by: margaret | October 6, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Mandell made a refreshingly honest statement. It is the face of femminism in America. We think we’re femminists but we still have this false 1950s mentality.
A true “feminist” is neither conservative nor liberal but rather an “individualist”. We are simply members of the human race.
Posted by: sammi | October 6, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
As I read some of these entries, I see some people fear as I do: I fear for my two daughters’ futures. We CAN’T go backward and give up everything we’ve fought for.
As fow those who think NOW should just follow blindly behind ANY woman in support, NO! We support the ideals, not the gender. That is what makes the NOW organization independent thinkers.
Posted by: JD | October 6, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
How do we know what Obama is for since no one can find any of his records wish I could dump some of my past into the black hole Obama has droped his in we know the lest about him than any other running for President and Anita Hill I am sure has a different O on Biden.
Posted by: Bishop | October 6, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Here’s the actual Albright quote and please note what it says about what women need to do to earn respect from male collegues:
***”What advice do you have for women who want respect from their male colleagues?” Dana Philbin of Chicago asked Albright for a January piece in Time Magazine.
“Women have to be active listeners and interrupters,” she responded, “but when you interrupt, you have to know what you are talking about. I also think it is important for women to help one another. I have a saying: There is a special place in hell for women who don’t.”***
Notice that
1) it was not relating to politics, but business.
2) Women need to know what they’re talking about BEFORE engaging their mouths (as a woman, I agree). It just makes them, and the rest of us, look stupid.
3) This woman is a supporter of women’s rights and therefore a feminist? Tell that to the rape victims in Wasilla who had to pay for their rape kits and the thousands of others who live in the state with the highest incidence of violence against women in the country. Tell that to the young women in her state that need accurate and effective total sex education (including about abstinence)so that they can avoid the unwanted pregnancies that lead to abortion or the STD’s that they aren’t educated about or know how to prevent.
Tell me, what has Palin done for women, ever?
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 6, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Hello? Hell-o-o-o-? No wonder women have a bad name. You don’t become governor on your looks. Let’s see, oh yes, you all must be jealous of women who speak up and get things done. Anmd not only can Gov. Palin do that, she also knows that many women can do that. The media–has anyone questioned them on their qualifications to be commentators? Who needs their brainless opinions? Katie Couric–oh–you were referring to HER as the bimbo. Great, she’s got a high paying job and is a celebrity, but her stuff gets written for her–please people, wake up.
Posted by: LilyPotter | October 6, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Palin is an embarrassment for women. She tries to BS or “muddle” her way through things, and it shows so badly with her nonsensical banter. The more she talks, the less she knows.
Posted by: r-dub | October 6, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I am heartened to see NOW step forward and support all women and endorse Sarah Palin. I was upset with them when they let creepy Bill Clinton abuse the women who worked for him. The guy exposed himself to a state employee and NOW did nothing. I am glad they are back to their core principles.
Posted by: post-rational | October 6, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Brooklyn Dem – funny you mention Paris Hilton. I was just thinking today that Palin seems to be the Paris of politics. But instead of saying “that’s hot,” Palin says “you betcha” and “gosh darn it.”
Palin is a beautiful woman, no doubt about it. I want more and expect more in a female leader. But she is no role model for the beautiful young girls we have, including my daughter, that need to make their way in this world and rely on themselves and have self respect. Beauty AND brains gets more respect than beauty used to get ahead despite the lack of brains.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 6, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
The local chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) was there to endorse her, thereby welcoming all women who have wanted for decades to join the Woman’s Movement but were left on the peripheral because they wanted kids, still actually liked men, believed in God, preferred Democracy to Socialism, vocally supported Israel or and didn’t care to have abortions. Then there are all those nasty women who put Country before Party. Especially considering the Party in question is led by hypocritical bigots and misogynists who have been duping women through false fear for decades.
Posted by: CrystalD | October 6, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
McCain pays his female staffers MORE than Obama….wake up people. My 14 year old daughter loves Gov. Palin and looks up to her as a role model. You see, I’ve taught her to respect her own, and not trash and diminish other females. LADIES….DOES IT FEEL GOOD TO EAT YOUR OWN? I am a 50 year old woman who will not wait ANOTHER 24 YEARS TO SEE A WOMAN ON THE TICKET….really girls, you think Gov. Palin will put us back….you really are giving her too much power. WE NEED TO SEE A WOMAN LEADER IN OUR COUNTRY, and I am an ex Hillary supporter, who switched to McCain immediately after Hillary dropped out because OBAMA IS JUST NOT FIT FOR CIC….NEVER.
Support your own ladies……Palin moved up the ladder on her own, gals….what have you done for your country lately?
COUNTRY FIRST McCAIN/PALIN
NEVER EGO FIRST B. HUSSEIN
Posted by: DLM | October 6, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Wait a minute…some of you are saying that I or NOW should support any woman??
Do I want to support a woman who says I have no choice?
Do I want to support a woman who acts like I have to giggle and wink my way to the top?
Do I support a woman who treats here employees like friends and when they disagree with her she fires them?
I am sorry, but I want a strong woman to support, not one that will take me back to the time when I would have to giggle and look cute just to get what I wanted.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
“Tell that to the rape victims in Wasilla who had to pay for their rape kits”
Not true — never happened — completely discredited.
This was a statewide policy in place before Palin took office as Wasilla mayor, and the policy actually was to bill the victim’s insurance company, not the victim.
Posted by: jblog | October 6, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
DLM ..McCain pays his female staffers more then Obama??
Prove that…
A statement with out facts is nothing more then a lie until proof.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Somewhere in the world Gloria Steinham and Marlo Thomas are aghast. Sara Palin is truly scary.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 6, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Shelly Mandell, you did awesome job that
endosed a right woman who can reform
Washington as well as cut Tax and improve education systems for even our
disabled children. Among of candidates,
John/Obama/Biden/Sarah, only Palin has a proven experienced to cut tax and to reform. In order to make profits she tried to set up Pipe Natural Gas Line.
It has successfully enable to cut tax then to bring benefits to Alaskan. As American I am so proud of Palin is a woman who is outsider of Washington,and
is not rich or elite, but she made it and she will made it for American.
Posted by: Janet from NY | October 6, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Just because she has a uterus does not make her qualified to be President or even Vice President. Return Sarah to the rent a uterus she was found at immediately.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 6, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
jblog…First if you have no insurance, then what?
Also read her records from Wassilla…you can look them up, real eye opener for sure.
Left them with millions of debt, and there were only about 6,000 people there.
Ask them how they feel.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
>>Not to quibble with Ms. Mandell, but I bet if Katie Couric had asked Palin if she supported Title Nine she would have drawn a blank stare before Palin said<<
Actually, Palin mentioned Title Nine at a townhall meeting last month in response to a question about women's rights. She played basketball? in high school.
Also, in case you don't know, McCain pays his female staff more than Obama does… Google for more info.
Posted by: Don | October 6, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Alaska has the highest rate of rape..a lot of money to be had for those rape kits whoever gets the money huh?
She cut taxes alright, she cut funding for education, special needs and when she gave money back to the people in way of gas tax…what do you think happened?
They paid higher taxes when they bought gas at the pump!!
You need to do more reading and talking to the people of Alaska…the web is a vast arena of knowledge, look it up.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I am a lifelong Democrat, a male, with 2 graduate degrees and a professional job–I am voting McCain this fall- my first vote ever for a Republican. In these perilous times, I cannot in good conscience vote for a rookie Senator Obama who I simply do not trust with the presidency.
I may disagree with McCain on some issues but believe he will provide some balance as President. On the other hand, an Obama-Pelosi-Reid will be a toxic far left trifecta
Posted by: American Voter | October 6, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Don …
I looked up the pay, but you failed to mention one thing.
You don’t get equal pay for doing different jobs.
It is equal pay for equal jobs!!
Not every body is qualified to do the same job, so your statement does not hold water.
See how rumors get started by omitting a few facts?
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Hey Bev – (CNSNews.com) – While Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has produced a television ad criticizing Sen. John McCain’s position on equal pay for women and pointing out that women in America are paid only 77 cents on the dollar compared to men, Obama pays his own female Senate staffers, on average, only 78 percent of what he pays male staffers.
Women on McCain’s staff, meanwhile, earn 24 percent more on average than women on Obama’s Senate staff. McCain also pays his female Senate staff members a higher average salary than his male Senate staff members.
Women occupy seven of the top 10 highest-paid positions on McCain’s staff, and five of the top 10 highest-paid positions on Obama’s staff.
The numbers come from the most recent Report of the Secretary of the Senate, which includes the salaries of every member of each U.S. senator’s staff during the period of Oct. 1, 2007 through March 31, 2008.
Proof enough?
Posted by: BizBag | October 6, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Dear sweet little adorable Sarah…
Since we’re talking about guilt by association, I am sure that you will not be upset when the Democrats start airing ads showing that your husband was a member of a group that favored Alaskan secession from the United States.
People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones……
Let not forget Sarah Palin association’s with the radical Alaska Independence Party that wants to secede from this great country, the United States of America.
And here is a quote from Alaskan Independence Party founder Joe Voegler:
“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag!”
I wonder how Palin explains her husband”s verified membership in the “ALASKIAN INDEPENDENCE PARTY?” Seems she doesn”t believe in the UNITED States of America, does she??
and also don’t forget McCain’s pastor(s) the one who said New Orleans desrved what it got, it was punishment from God….
hey Sarah, go ahead and bring up Obama’s pastor…
I’ll take an angry marine pastor over some witch doctor…
Posted by: beck | October 6, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Bev – you and your cronies remind me of the line “You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth!”
Posted by: BizBag | October 6, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Apparently the Republicans think women are stupid.
Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
“jblog…First if you have no insurance, then what?”
Then the municipality absorbs the cost — it is not passed on to the victim.
Please, if you don’t know what you’re talking about — and you don’t — then don’t post.
Posted by: jblog | October 6, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
As a woman, I am very proud of Ms. Mandells courage. I know first hand what it is like to not be in lockstep with the feminist agenda and it isn’t pretty.
Sarah Palin may not look, behave, and think like NOW dictates that ‘true’ feminists should but make no mistake, Palin is her own women who makes her own choices. Isn’t that what feminism should be all about?
Posted by: mary | October 6, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
BizBag
Proof of what? You just showed us the flaw in the logic. The McCain campaign happens to have women in higher-paid positions, so of course an average of ALL positions would show that women make more, ON AVERAGE. That has nothign to do with “equal pay for equal work,” because the work is not equal. Not all of the jobs in a campaign are equal.
Nice try, though.
Posted by: jock59801 | October 6, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I am a lifelong Republican. Recently, I had had radical surgery that re-attached the 50% of my cerebral cortex that had become disconnected during the last eight years. I have two degrees and a ‘professional’ job. Although I have voted Republican all my life I can no longer do so. I am ashamed that Sen. McCain chose Gov. Palin and can not in good conscience vote for Sen. McCain as he has demonstrated himself to a man dedicated to the destruction of America.
Posted by: dopeyRepubs | October 6, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I can handle the truth as long as the truth is being said.
As long as Obama is paying is females the fair salary for the jobs they are doing, it matters not what McCain pays his.
And you are assuming those women who work for Obama are there against their will, please!!!
I won’t change your mind nor will you change my mind…vote for who you think it right and I will do the same.
If I am wrong on November 5th, then I will admit I am wrong, will you?
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
jblog…and where do you think the municipality gets the money from, out of the Alaska sky?
Sorry, but they may have no income tax but they do have higher sales tax.
And with that trickle down economy that Bush talked about, it trickles down as well to the lower 48.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 6, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Sarah Palin’s take on feminism: Pay for your rape kit and pray you’re not pregnant,’cause you can’t do nothin’ about it if y’are.
Bully with lipstick…dog of a human being.
Posted by: HiloBbob | October 6, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Obama and the Attempt to Destroy the Second Amendment
As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangely silent about his eight years (1994-2002) as a director of the Joyce Foundation, a billion dollar tax-exempt organization. He has one obvious reason: during his time as director, Joyce Foundation spent millions creating and supporting anti-gun organizations.
There is another, less known, reason.
During Obama’s tenure, the Joyce Foundation board planned and implemented a program targeting the Supreme Court. The work began five years into Obama’s directorship, when the Foundation had experience in turning its millions into anti-gun “grassroots” organizations, but none at converting cash into legal scholarship.
The plan’s objective was bold: the judicial obliteration of the Second Amendment.
Joyce’s directors found a vulnerable point. When judges cannot rely upon past decisions, they sometimes turn to law review articles. Law reviews are impartial, and famed for meticulous cite-checking. They are also produced on a shoestring. Authors of articles receive no compensation; editors are law students who work for a tiny stipend.
In 1999, midway through Obama’s tenure, the Joyce board voted to grant the Chicago-Kent Law Review $84,000, a staggering sum by law review standards. The Review promptly published an issue in which all articles attacked the individual right view of the Second Amendment.
In a breach of law review custom, Chicago-Kent let an “outsider” serve as editor; he was Carl Bogus, a faculty member of a different law school. Bogus had a unique distinction: he had been a director of Handgun Control Inc. (today’s Brady Campaign), and was on the advisory board of the Joyce-funded Violence Policy Center.
Bogus solicited only articles hostile to the individual right view of the Second Amendment, offering authors $5,000 each. But word leaked out, and Prof. Randy Barnett of Boston University volunteered to write in defense of the individual right to arms. Bogus refused to allow him to write for the review, later explaining that “sometimes a more balanced debate is best served by an unbalanced symposium.” Prof. James Lindgren, a former Chicago-Kent faculty member, remembers that when Barnett sought an explanation he “was given conflicting reasons, but the opposition of the Joyce Foundation was one that surfaced at some time.” Joyce had bought a veto power over the review’s content.
Posted by: Kirsten Powers | October 6, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Charlie Keating, the banker and anti-pornography crusader, would ultimately be convicted on 73 counts of fraud and racketeering for his role in the savings-and-loan scandal of the 1980s. That crisis, much like today’s subprime-mortgage meltdown, resulted from misbegotten banking deregulation, and ultimately left taxpayers to pick up a tab of more than $124 billion. Keating, who raised more than $100,000 for McCain’s race, lavished the first-term congressman with the kind of political favors that would make Jack Abramoff blush. McCain and his family took at least nine free trips at Keating’s expense, and vacationed nearly every year at the mogul’s estate in the Bahamas. There they would spend the days yachting and snorkeling and attending extravagant parties in a world McCain referred to as “Charlie Keating’s Shangri-La.” Keating also invited Cindy McCain and her father to invest in a real estate venture for which he promised a 26 percent return on investment. They plunked down more than $350,000.
Unfortunately, any lessons McCain learned from the Keating scandal didn’t affect his unbridled enthusiasm for deregulating the finance industry. “He continues to follow policies that create the same kind of environment we see today, with recurrent financial crises and epidemics of fraud led by CEOs,” says Black, the former S&L regulator. Indeed, if the current financial crisis has a villain, it is Phil Gramm, who remains close to McCain. As chair of the Senate Banking Committee in the late 1990s, Gramm ushered in — with McCain’s fervent support — a massive wave of deregulation for insurance companies and brokerage houses and banks, the aftershocks of which are just now being felt in Wall Street’s catastrophic collapse. McCain, who has admitted that “the issue of economics is not something I’ve understood as well as I should,” relies on Gramm to guide him.
Posted by: beck | October 6, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
I am pleasantly surprised at Shelly Mandell’s remarks. Gloria Steinem made me furious when she remarked that Palin was the wrong woman with the wrong message.
Hillary is old school. I see Palin as the new face of women in politics, a definite paradigm shift.
I don’t agree with her on all her views either but I am not going to act like a crab in a crab bucket. There aren’t any lids on crab buckets because crabs will pull down another crab if it tries to escape the bucket.
Brava, Ms. Mandell! You are a brave, independent woman.
Posted by: Fallon | October 6, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I want Gov. Palin to give me a $1,200 check like she did all Alaskans from big oil companies.
This economic crisis has somehow made Americans think B. Hussein is going to do anything for us when there IS NO MONEY!!!!!
This is just a figurehead election at this point people….there will be NO National healthcare, NO $2,000 for every college kid (he loves to pander to his base).
Palin gets things done, has a track record of bucking the system and her own party as does McCain….they are Mavericks and don’t think Obama campaign doesn’t feel she’s a threat. They really have nothing to go on with McCain so they attack the #2, when THEIR #1 IS A JOKE….ASK HILLARY AND BIDEN….THEY KNOW HE’S NOT QUALIFIED.
LET’S SEE THOSE ADS AGAIN WITH DEMS IN THEIR OWN WORDS STATING THE TRUTH!!!
Posted by: DLM | October 6, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Just as the media has done digging into Palin’s past, it would only be fair for the media to dig into Oboma’s past. And then to report. And you won’t have to dig very far. The bloggers are doing it for you.
Posted by: Norman Glass | October 6, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Palin has the nerve to talk about Obama – when she infact is one step away from being a felon. Troopergate, tax evasion, witchcraft. This is the best John McCain could do????
Posted by: whynot | October 6, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
What an insult to feminism!
Posted by: chris | October 6, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
jblog -
The “rape kit” truth is exactly the opposite of the nonsense you’re peddling here.
In 2000, Wasilla was the only town in Alaska to charge rape victims (it’s true that if the victim had insurance, the town tried to pass the charge onto the victim’s insurance company).
The Alaska legislature, aiming directly at Wasilla, banned this practice and the ban was signed into law by then Governor Knowles in 2000.
It’s one thing to have opinions. It’s another to turn facts upside down and inside out.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 6, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I was at the rally on Saturday. I heard both speak. Shelly Mandell is the first rep from NOW that is willing to look at both sides. She admitted she did not agree wholeheartely with Sarah, BUT she supports the woman and the main ideals that Sarah represents.I would support NOW is they represented all women’s views not just the left. See how quick NOW was to denounce Mandell’s support as her own.
By the way, the whole Ayers thing was one sentence in the whole speech. Who is editing Palin’s statements and what she is about. She did talk about the economy, she did talk about taxes, she did talk about McCain’s plan.
Try reading or listening to whole speeches on either side without media editing and you will truly know who deserves to win in November. Use your brain, read the truth not internet rumors and slander.
Posted by: Kim | October 6, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
It is no surprise that Obama supporters are hyperventilating over Palin’s fearlessness to present the truth about Obama’s inconsistencies and lies about his relationships. In 2004, Obama bragged that he went to hear Rev. Wright every Sunday; yet he “was not present” when Rev. Wright railed against America, etc. On the Ayers issue, we hear new “facts” minimizing Obama’s contact with him. They ignore that Michell Obama worked in the same law firm as Ayer’s wife. And that Tony Resko…and that Larry Walsh….and that Franklin Raines…all charged and/or convicted of fraud. How many of these relationships do there have to be to see the stuff that Obama is made of?
The indignation that Palin’s critics show is really driven by fear that those suppressed topics will upstage their chosen abstract themes.
Posted by: cpabooks | October 6, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Golly. I’m an Obama supporter. I’m not hyperventilating about Wright, Ayers or any other darn thing. It’s old news…we’ve all seen and heard it before. If you’d dropped in from Mars this Spring, you’d have thought that Wright was running for President.
If we’re going to talk about religious nut cases, here’s what I would like to know:
1) when will MSM start running the video of the African Witch Doctor laying hands on Sarah and mumbo-jumboing about keeping the witches away from her;
2) when will the nation get to hear the sermon she sat through about how Israel is beset by terrorists because Jews refuse to become Christians; and,
3) when will Americans get a chance to listen to her pastor rant about how “God is going to raise his hand against America, Alaska, and yes, Wasilla!” His ugly nonsense is indistinguishable from other hate-mongering fruit cakes like Wright, Hagee, Robertson and Falwell.
More signficantly, the Dow dropped 800 points today and 159,000 Americans lost their jobs last month. I guess if I were Palin and McCain, I’d much rather talk about Wright and Ayers.
3) when
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 6, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I can believe what I’m reading….Sarah Palin, charged the price for examining rape victims to the poor, this is help to women
Posted by: norma mendez | October 6, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I am also a female GOP voter who is insulted by McCain’s Veep choice. No Rice? No Dole? No vote from me.
To think, I supported him over the past 8 years. That support stopped the minute Palin opened her mouth. He alienated his real female base.
Posted by: sammi | October 6, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Shelly Mandell was not speaking for Los Angeles NOW, California NOW, or national NOW. California NOW has issued a statement reaffirming support for the Obama/Biden ticket, in keeping with the National NW PAC endorsement:
Posted by: Elena Perez | October 6, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I am a Democrat turned Republican turned Independent turned Republican with three degrees. I always look carefully at the candidates and vote for the best person for the job. This year I am supporting John McCain because of his outstanding personal character and lifetime of service to our country and because he is a moderate who has worked extremely well with his colleagues on both sides of the political spectrum to cut waste and fraud in our government. I am not voting for Barack Obama because of his lack of experience, his liberal “tax and spend” voting record and I am afraid that if he is elected he will surround himself with radicals — as he seems to have done in the past.
Posted by: professorj | October 6, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
At war the first casualty is the truth. At this electoral race the truth has been killed by McCain/Palin and the Republicans
Posted by: republicans nomore | October 6, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Actually Palin misquoted Albright and Albright is not too happy about it
On another note I do remember reading that 200 former diplomats support Obama. That is an endorsement I can respect
Posted by: WeLoveOurBooks | October 6, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Not a bad public endorsement for McCain/ Palin!
Palin is the best thing that has happened to this election cycle. I hope she can help clean out the Augean Congress and return it to the people.
Posted by: ReginaldL | October 6, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Governor Palin didn’t advocate charging women the cost of the rape kits when she was the mayor of Wasilla. It was a practice across Alaska in many towns and cities and when it was called to the attention of the state a law was passed to make sure it didn’t happen any longer. Shelly Mandell is right – Sarah Palin is the embodiment of feminism. The real feminism, not that hijacked, bastardized form that has been promoted by the left.
Posted by: Joanne600 | October 6, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I’m a Pro-Choice Republican.
I’m pleased with the L.A. NOW endorsement Of Palin.
It is time for women to support other competent women. Please.
I don’t agree with Palin’s personal views on choice, I am comfortable with her being assertive enough to get the job done.
We all can’t agree on all social issues.
It is about time we had a lady in the White House. My husband and I would be happy if Palin were President.
Thanks. Go competent Women. Go NOW.
Posted by: Linda Spears | October 6, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
I can’t wait to see Tina Fey use William Ayers in her Palin comedy skit.
Posted by: Alina Dominguez | October 6, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
wow, i was undecided, but with first joe lieberman and now Shelly Mandell going for McCain, it just seems simple, he just seems to be the one everyone can agree on
Posted by: mark 5.56 | October 6, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
So what! – Rosie O’Donnell & Whoopee Goldberg support Obama!
Posted by: Agnes Inzirillo | October 6, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
It’s so refreshing to see the NOW organization President acknowledging Sarah and endorsing the ticket. The organization should embrace all women, not just the ones who are embarrassed about their past abortions and have to insult those who choose not to have them. Sarah says she’ll never shove her personal views not to have an abortion on other women. She says she has no plans to push for these views on anyone if elected. It seems the left has grabbed onto this one thing and blown it out of proportion when Sarah has the right to exercise HER OWN CHOICE. One choice is as valid as the other. If the left criticizes her for having her choice to be life, they are nothing but empty windbag hypocrits.
Posted by: Jenna | October 6, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Who should pay for the “Rape Kit”? Small business owners? Those who have done well for themselves? Or the “poor” rape victim. If you get shot (clearly the victim of a crime), you or your insurance must pay for your ER visit. If there is a civil case and you win, you may get this money back? Why should rape be any different than another domestic crime such as attempted murder or robery in which a “victim” is injured?
Posted by: Bart | October 6, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Good for Shelly Mandell for being an individual. I know many many Hillary supporters who are now voting for McCain/Palin. You do not have to agree with all of the issues to support a ticket. Furthermore, I do not believe the current polls. Things will start shifting in the next few days. Hillary waited to long to go after Obama because she did not want to come across as a racist. Obama and his campaign can not handle anyone questioning his past associations. What will Obama do when Evil Dictators from other countries start pushing him around. He has slid through the campaign and now we will see what Obama is really made of !
Posted by: Linda | October 6, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
I just wanted to say thank you to NOW and all the organization has done for women. I also want to say thank you to Shelly Mandell for reaching out to Palin. I love what NOW does, I may not agree with everything, but I am certainly proud of all the women who embrace women’s rights – thank you to all of you. It was just refreshing to witness Shelly Mandell put aside some of the differnces to support Palin.
Posted by: Stefani Izquierdo | October 6, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
The simple fact of her being a pro-life married mother of five with a thriving political career was–before anything else about her was known–enough for the left and its outliers to target her for destruction. She could not be allowed to contradict symbolically one of the central narratives of the left. How galling it will be to Sarah Palin’s many new enemies if she survives this assault and prevails. If she does, her success may be an important moment in the struggle to shape not just America’s politics but its culture.
Posted by: Alina Petrovic | October 6, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I PRAY FOR OBAMA AND HIS CAMPAIGN
Posted by: Wanda | October 6, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
But no mention in the story that NOW’s endorsed candidate, Obama, has virtually no women in his senior staff and he pays them a fraction of what he pays men. But he’s all for women. Sure he is.
Posted by: Rick | October 6, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
>>>Palin is the best thing that has happened to this election cycle. I hope she can help clean out the Augean Congress and return it to the people.
Me too. I can’t see Obama changing anything with a left wing controlled Congress and the bias media on their side. We all will be so had. God bless McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Christie | October 6, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
>>>California’s NOW President, Patty Bellasalma, issued a statement saying that the “National Organization for Women Political Action Committee (NOW
This lady will probably get blasted for doing this. She’s right about Palin. I cannot see Sarah pushing an agenda against women. A mother of 5 children and a career that she worked for on her own. I think Sarah’s awesome and fresh. Sometimes, a regular joe/ jane citizen from the outside can have a better impact towards society and government than a seasoned politican because many of them do not want to give up their jobs and or dirty. Are they for term limits? I doubt that.
Posted by: Christie | October 7, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Disgusting. Sarah Palin doesn’t care about women’s rights. Mandell is wrong that Sarah Palin will break up the old boy network. Sarah Palin is no feminist.
Posted by: Larry | October 7, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Of course, none of the NOW gals bring up that there isn’t even pay parity among the women in the Obama campaign! Obama is a total fraud when it comes to women’s issues.
I really hope McCain/Palin takes this phony empty suit to the cleaners on election day.
Posted by: Florentius | October 7, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Good for Shelly M for speaking her mind. I’m sure she’ll be ostracized for her decision. Sarah Palin is an outstanding role model for young women all across the country. I am very proud that my daughter can see such a fine example. I for one believe that your personal choice to spend time with radical losers does reflect your judgement. We all lead busy lives and barely have time for the people we love and care about much less “radical people we really don’t know all that well.” Give me a break. Obama can you answer a question with an answer and not your handlers prepared answers. Why don’t you ask Hillary about Obama’s treatment of women!! Obama NOT ready to lead.
Posted by: cadrmn | October 7, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
I am so sad to hear this news – for those wondering why it wasn’t reported as widely in the mainstream media (although I just heard of it on CNN 3 times today, so I’m not sure what that comment was all about?) it was because Shelley supported Sarah Palin as an individual not as part of NOW -
I’m really saddened to see women being attracted to a woman who doesn’t represent equal pay for equal work, who is running with a candidate who degraded Hillary Clinton and her daughter in public, opposed the Violence Against Women Act and basically has never shown a regard for women until he saw them as a viable voting block he should go after.
I know many of us are supporting Sarah Palin because “she’s just like me” but please be advised women are ever so diversity and what McCain/Palin represent will be detrimental for so many of us..unlike what you like to think Sarah Palin is more a ploy than the real deal. Very, very sad.
I wish we all accepted our differences and worked together as women – I’m not sure why we let these politicians divide us.
Posted by: Karen | October 7, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
49,000,000 abortions performed in the U.S. since Roe v Wade passed in 1973.
What percentage would have been done by “back-alley” abortionists, back in the so-called day?
Posted by: c'est moi | October 7, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Shelly will surely be made to pay by the elite feminist establishment. True feminist should do what Shelly did and embrace Palin. Palin is indeed what feminists looks like: a real woman, from the real world and not in a cloistered ideological cocoon. Yet, she empowered herself and benefited from feminist liberation. We should all embrace Sarah Palin. It is disgusting that so many national leaders and educated women are doing the dirty work for a man that pushed into the ground the most qualified candidate for president and used intimidation to browbeat her and push her from the campaign and then asked her to campaign for him. All the while he himself is utterly unqualified. Sarah and I don’t agree on many things, but she has shown that she puts her country’s interest first and she has guts and we need to support her .I will do so. I am glad Shelly did this and hopefully it encourages other women to do the same.
Posted by: Lola Cornwell | October 7, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Yes, I pray for the Obama campaign myself….
I PRAY TO GOD BHO IS NOT THE NEXT POTUS!!!
From what I can gather, there are millions doing likewise.
Posted by: maryclaudia | October 7, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICANS MAKING PACTS WITH SATAN.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICANS USING RELIGION AS A VOTING TOOL.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICAN LIES AND MANIPULATIONS.
ENOUGH OF PALIN PRETENDING TO CARE FOR WOMEN WHEN SHE IS WILL SEND ALL WOMEN WHO OPT TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO CHOOSE TO JAIL.
Posted by: siobama | October 7, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
I have always been pro-choice. I am sick and tired of the importance placed on reproductive rights by both sides. The left uses the potential loss of the right to instill fear and back alley abortions. The right uses the whole baby killing argument. Both sides are playing on the stupidity and emotions of women.
I totally concur with Mandell. I am offended by the National Leader of NOW. As a mother of a girl, I cannot believe that Sarah Palin does not advocate women’s rights with the exception of the abortion issue. Sarah has 4 daughters are they trying to tell us she doesn’t want equal opportunities for her daughters?
Posted by: ubu1991 | October 7, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Senator Obama has taken note of and appreciates California’s NOW President, Patty Bellasalma’s support.
”Thanks, Sweetie!”
Posted by: Joey | October 7, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am
There is more to being feminist than rights. I’ve quit my association with NOW, to me Sarah Palin has worked her way up, she walks the walk. I feel very strongly she represents me.
Posted by: Eileen | October 7, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
Mandall has true courage and convictions, both qualities of a true feminist. WHAT A WOMAN!!!!!
This election has exposed NOW for what they really are all about – a liberal agenda that has nothing to do with women’s rights. Shame on NOW for not celebrating Palin being picked as a future VP.
Posted by: Wolfin | October 7, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am
NOW needs to wake up NOW! WOMEN IN AMERICA ARE FREE THINKING INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE OUR OWN CHOICES AND DESTINIES. We will not let party leaders or NOW talking heads deter our members and activists from freedom and equality for all women, putting our hopes and our dreams, our hard work and our hard-earned money, behind a proven team for women, their children and ALL AMERICA: the next President of the United States SENATOR McCAIN 2008
Posted by: Judy in Oklahoma | October 7, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am
I don’t agree with NOW, but I think they’re right to say that she is speaking for herself as a private citizen and that her views do not represent their organization. That it is misleading and unfair to say they do.
Where they get a tad annoying is turning it into a harangue about Pro-Choice and Obama-love. I mean I think everyone knows that NOW always supports the Democratic candidate for President and pretty much never supports a Republican at any level. You don’t need to beat Mandell on the head for her unorthodoxy. (Or even for being a fool if one feels that)
Posted by: Thomas R | October 7, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Shelly Mandell represents a TRUE modern feminist far, far more than the other NOW leaders ever will. By standing up as a free-thinking woman and taking a personal stand, and by exercising her right to speak up in a true personal voice, she showed what feminism is SUPPOSED to be about.
Then again, that’s why Sarah Palin scares the establishment of NOW so much. Because Heaven forbid women should start thinking for themselves as opposed to immediately following any and all marching orders that the old-time leaders want to give out…
Posted by: Free Thinker | October 7, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Shelly, like Gov Palin, is free to be herself…and she is walking the walk…not just whinning. How funny that NOW would have to put out a statement denying one of their top members. What a stab-in-the-back…I guess it is not okay to think for yourselves. NOW tends to hate men…Sarah Palin is no man-hater…Shelly loves the freedom!
Posted by: I'm DZ | October 7, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
I am applauded with the differences in the responses of Obama supporters and McCain supporters. How come people could have so much hate and disgusts with other people’s choices. I thought you Obama supporters are pro-choice? Or, you are just pro-choices when the choices are the same as yours?
In the mist of financial meltdown, we need a mature leader with track records. Ask yourself calmly, when and what Obama has done for this country. Obama divided his own party into slices from the primary election. He did not choose Hillary even though Hillary is the strongest among the other choices. He motivated millions to form a coalition (PUMA) to oppose him. Obama cannot even work within the aisle, how can you convince yourself that he would work across the aisle to get the job done when unity is of the most important for the country now? How about John McCain, how many democrats need to come out and specify their support before you are convinced he is the one who can unify this country?
Posted by: chungmoyung | October 7, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
It’s interesting that women who promote equal rights for women are aggravated at a women who wants to make her own choice and pursue a political career. Palin’s choice is to not abort her child with special needs. And now Mandell made a choice to endorse a certain candidate; but because she’s not the ‘right’ one, Mandell is suddenly discredited and uneducated.
Additionally, Obama is a mystery and, maybe McCain doesn’t “question his patriotism”, but I do! I simply can’t vote for someone with so many shady companions and advisers.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 7, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
I am applauded with the differences in the responses of Obama supporters and McCain supporters. How come people could have so much hate and disgusts with other people’s choices. I thought you Obama supporters are pro-choice? Or, you are just pro-choices when the choices are the same as yours?
In the mist of financial meltdown, we need a mature leader with track records. Ask yourself calmly, when and what Obama has done for this country. Obama divided his own party into slices from the primary election. He did not choose Hillary even though Hillary is the strongest among the other choices. He motivated millions to form a coalition (PUMA) to oppose him. Obama cannot even work within the aisle, how can you convince yourself that he would work across the aisle to get the job done when unity is of the most important for the country now? How about John McCain, how many democrats need to come out and specify their support before you are convinced he is the one who can unify this country?
Posted by: chungmoyung | October 7, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Break this down:
Taxes, why is it acceptable policy to “take” tax dollars and give them to people who have no tax liability, Obama says that under his plan 95% will get tax cuts. Of that 95% of tax breaks 35% pay no taxes in the first place so why are they getting a “refund” (which should be called a hand out). Higher taxes on business aren’t the answer. The only thing that does is cause business owners to not hire or expand because they have to pay taxes. Lower taxes on business and they grow and hire.
Health Care: Please tell me why it would be a good thing to have Government run Health Care, look at Canada, not a good thing. Think about it, do you trust that Government does well with what we have given them to be in charge of? I don’t. McCain’s health care plan may not be perfect few things are, but one thing it does that Obama’s doesn’t is to give the people a choice, to allow us to make our own decision instead of the Government doing it. Wake up people, Government is not the answer.
Social Reform: why is it acceptable and good to give a hand out instead of a hand up! Why does the democratic leadership think that America “needs” to be taken care of by Government? And why is it a bad thing to teach people to be self sufficient. The Hispanic population gets it and that’s why the majority of the time they do not vote democratic. They see how African Americans have been used and belittled by the liberals who claim to want to “help”. What help is to make someone believe the government can “save” them.
National Security: When Obama wants to set down with Terrorists such as Ahmadinejad (leader of Iran) that is DANGEROUS. In case you haven’t heard about the Iranian ship off the coast of Africa that was captured by pirates who began to die because of a “mysterious” chemical on board, then you need to read up! How can he think we can talk to people who want us wiped off the face of the earth, gone, dead, non existent? I don’t want a nation of do gooders who think we can talk our way out of nuclear war by being diplomatic with killers.
Oh and I also don’t think live birth abortion, late term abortion and saline abortion should be legal… just thought I’d throw that in for good measure because the democratic party thinks it should all be legal.
Posted by: Deegie | October 7, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Isn’t this the same NOW that rallied around Bill Clinton when he was credibly accused of rape, convicted of what anyone else would call sexual harassment, and had a track record of serial sexual exploitation of women?
Posted by: John Galt | October 7, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
You Go Shelly! THANK YOU for not being afraid to exercise your First Amendment rights. I’m a supporter of Roe vs. Wade which states CLEARLY that a fetus’ viability is the time limit for which a woman can choose what to do with a pregnancy. When Democrats vehemently defend partial birth abortion and now Obama would have infanticide included in abortion rights, I have to draw the line and say no more. Roe vs. Wade didn’t create a right to destroy viable life. For those that would argue Obama’s talking point defending his vote against protecting babies that survive abortion….I researched the laws on the book in Illinois…Obama lied.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 7, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
ok, can we all make a deal? when obama loses. with all the extra money, all the media on his side. all the meters pointing dem. when he loses…..can the dems just disband? can they just go away? talk about a gang that can’t shoot straight. these guys, the dems, are hilarious. in a year they CAN’T lose. they nominate someone who CAN’T WIN. and they want to run anything? ya gotta admit, they are funny as hell. when they aren’ty spewing hate and venom and spewing old outdated (not new or change) 1970′s failed big government claptrap. peace. but please, dems, in november….please….take your meds the day after…please. for your sakes.
Posted by: fred | October 7, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Dear sweet little adorable Sarah…
Since we’re talking about guilt by association, I am sure that you will not be upset when the Democrats start airing ads showing that your husband was a member of a group that favored Alaskan secession from the United States.
People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones……
Let not forget Sarah Palin association’s with the radical Alaska Independence Party that wants to secede from this great country, the United States of America.
And here is a quote from Alaskan Independence Party founder Joe Voegler:
“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag!”
I wonder how Palin explains her husband”s verified membership in the “ALASKIAN INDEPENDENCE PARTY?” Seems she doesn”t believe in the UNITED States of America, does she??
and also don’t forget McCain’s pastor(s) the one who said New Orleans desrved what it got, it was punishment from God….
hey Sarah, go ahead and bring up Obama’s pastor…
I’ll take an angry marine pastor over some witch doctor…
—-
Are you kidding me. You are comparing this to all of the fithly associations Obama has in his life? Especailly with an adimitted TERRORIST that has set off bombs in our country????? Please get some credibility will you.
Posted by: Luis Vazquez | October 7, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Wow!! Somebody said that people should have listened to the entire speech instead of listening to internet rumors in regards to statements made by Palin.
That is hilarious considering everything that people have against Obama has come from internet rumors or not listening to the entire statement(Rev.Wright).
I can’t believe the Repubs started this guilty by association thing especially when Palin and McCain have a much greater link to crazy pastors, questionable anti-american groups, and character flaws.
I believe in uplifting women but there are too many highly educated, well-informed, women who don’t have to flirt with the camera to get there point across in the Republican Party. How do I respect a women that can’t provide facts and figures or list of periodicals(some journalism degree that was) and who is rude and mean-spritied? Just because she is a smiling working mom doesn’t make her cruel remarks any better. Obama supported her when clearly she did not teach abstinence to her daughter which is one of her biggest political stances besides oil.
Mandell should not be praised because she is doing something different by supporting Palin, because when people support Obama they are considered just followers not different.
The only difference is Obama supporters actually know and like his politics. Most “regular” women voting for Palin like her because she is a working mom not for her politics. Remember Mandell does not agree wholeheartedly with Palin.
Posted by: Ashley | October 7, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I’m getting of the Ayers accusations.
Here is some truth for you.
William Ayers is a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, with whom Barack served on the board of a charitable anti-poverty organization in the mid-1990s. According to the Associated Press, they are not close: “No evidence shows they were “pals” or even close when they worked on community boards years ago …”
Smear groups and the McCain campaign are trying to connect Obama to acts Ayers committed 40 years ago – when Barack was just eight years old. Here’s what the New York Times reported on the connection:
But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called “somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.”
Barack has publicly denounced Ayers’ radical actions from the 1960’s:
Senator Obama strongly condemns the violent actions of the Weathermen group, as he does all acts of violence. But he was an eight-year-old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost forty years ago is ridiculous.
Posted by: chris | October 7, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
The idea that women should support a woman, any woman, just because of her chromosome, regardless of her policy positions, is an absurdity and an offence to thinking people everywhere. People shouldn’t support Palin because her policies are bad. Further, she is ignorant about the world and the most important issues on which she would be called upon to make decisions (economy; foreign policy, etc). And it is women in particular who should oppose Palin’s candidacy, because (a) her policies would have disproportionately negative impacts on women, and (b) McCain’s selection of her over other actually qualified and intelligent female candidates makes her nothing more than a token, which is at best insulting.
Posted by: seriously | October 7, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
The wife of Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel plans to endorse Democrat Barack Obama.
Lilibet Hagel has scheduled a 10 a.m. news conference in Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday with Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of Republican President Eisenhower. Susan Eisenhower also is an Obama supporter.
Posted by: chris | October 7, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Response to earlier comments…Pro-choice is about having a CHOICE!! if you are Pro-life…good for you, but why can’t you at least agree that others should have a CHOICE according to their situation. Get real. Having an abortion is not a fun option for anyone, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t get to choose how they live. Why are pro-lifers so worried about controlling other peoples lives?
Posted by: Charity | October 7, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Charity says Response to earlier comments…Pro-choice is about having a CHOICE!! if you are Pro-life…good for you, but why can’t you at least agree that others should have a CHOICE according to their situation. Get real. Having an abortion is not a fun option for anyone, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t get to choose how they live. Why are pro-lifers so worried about controlling other peoples lives?
I say – you DO HAVE A CHOICE TO have protected sex or deal with what happens when you don’t. That would be a baby. I mean, the choice should start when you decide to have sex. You decided to have sex unprotected you must have decided that if you get pregnant it’s no big deal! GET REAL and wrap it before you tap it!
Posted by: Deegie | October 7, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
How exciting to FINALLY see an intellectually honest feminist! Way to go Shelley Mandell! As a feminist, small business owning, wife and mother I am in total agreement with this gal’s support of Sarah Palin. I, among millions of other “real” women LOVE HER!
Go Palin/McCain! Let’s get some real change in Washington from someone who has actually done something and not just talked about it!
With Alec Baldwin’s recent ability to tell the truth about how Barney Frank and his gang of thugs in Washington and aat Fannie & Freddie are responsible in great part to this financial mess we are in; what is the world ccoming to? I applaud him his ability to see the truth despite of radical liberal stances on most things.
Posted by: Beth | October 7, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
I was totally offended that the LA President of NOW would introduce Sarah Palin, knowing full well than an inevitable comparison would be made. People would automatically assume the NOW supported Sarah Palin. I wil never again contribute to or support NOW as I find Sarah Palin to be so anti everything that NOW stands for.
Posted by: independent4ever | October 7, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I’m pretty disturbed by Mandel’s endorsement of Palin. Palin is an embarrassment for the women’s rights movement. She is anti-choice and she is about as far right-winged as you can get. Sarah Palin is very full of herself and she is not qualified to be VP. McCain is a rich guy along with a rich wife who have no clue how the rest of us live. I’m disgusted with the way the media has portrayed Palin as a side show diversion. McCain seems to be riding on the coat tails of the Palin media frenzy. It further disturbs me when someone from a pro-choice organization would endorse such a person. For Palin to allow herself to get pregnant at 44 makes me question her decision-making abilities. Forget talking about ending a pregnancy of another handicapped child. She doesn’t get any awards from me for those decisions. I’d be kind of embarrassed for the NOW organization with Mandel’s endorsement. She certainly doesn’t speak for the majority of women voters out there.
Posted by: Mitsy | October 7, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Any man or woman who can’t see right through Palin’s sociopathic act is an idiot.
Posted by: icarus | October 7, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
You liberal idiots would follow Obama to hell if it meant you didn’t have to try and understand a women who can actually be a women and not feel bad about it! feminist bs is all you are about. good luck with that.
Posted by: Deegie | October 7, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I am so surprised and pleased that an officer of NOW sees Sarah Palin for her qualities. She has been a relentless fighter in Alaska to break up the politically corrupt good old boys network. She’s non-partisan. She fights for what is right, regardless of political party. The USA needs a lot more politicians like her in Washington.
Thank you, Shelly Mandell!!!
Posted by: Patriot | October 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Our prayers have been answered….more and more people are putting down the kool-aide! Thank you Ms. Mandel & thank you everyone who goes beyond the hype of Obama-mania & sees the truth behind the facade!
Posted by: LFforMcCain | October 7, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
I am appalled that Shelly Mandell would endose Sarah Palin. Neither Sarah
Palin or John McCain embrace a woman’s right to choose, he voted against equal pay for women, she is against abortion in the case of rape or incest. This duo
would set women back decades. Just because Sarah Palin is photogenic and “folksy” does not make her presidential material. We are not electing a prom queen! And for those of you who keep referring to Senator Obama by his middle name. Get a clue…he was named for his father. He is not a Muslim. Wake up and admit your racist inclinations.
Posted by: Glenda Dickerson | October 7, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
My pastor’s wife commented that it was sexist of me to support McCain/Palin simply because Palin is a woman. Since I had decided to back McCain, not Obama, long before I knew Palin would be on the ticket I could just laugh at that assumption.
Thank you Shelly Mandell for having the courage to make your own decision and not be warned off by women threatened by Palin. I’m pro-choice feminist who campaigned to make abortions legal in the 1970s, and I’m proud to be supporting McCain/Palin.
Posted by: annetta | October 7, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Shelly Mandell should be fired for endorsing and promoting an anti-feminist candidate and doing so while mentioning her position at NOW.
I am a member of LA NOW and I am completely disgusted.
Posted by: eddie | October 7, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
I think the comment that Palin is an “anti-feminist” candidate is very telling. Feminism used to mean women would strive to be the best they could be and work to help other women do the same.
Now it seems that feminism really means a woman is pro-abortion. When did that narrower definition became accepted? That’s why I’m no longer a member of NOW or NARAL.
Posted by: annetta | October 8, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
It is appalling that the president of an organization that professes to be for women’s and human rights would endorse Palin, a woman who is against safe legal abortions, who had rape victims pay for the the rape kits used in the emergency room, who forces her teenage daughter into a marriage, and who is against even teaching about birth control and prevention of unwanted pregnancies.
And to those that may think my objection is only about being PRO abortion – no- it is about supporting safe and legal abortions for women who choose to have one.. All birth control is not 100% reliable, and accidental pregnancies do happen. Deciding to have an abortion is a painful and personal issue.
If abortions are outlawed, women will be forced back to the dark ages of back rooms, infections, perforated uteruses, and even more unwanted children.
It is not pro abortion , it is called pro choice!
Posted by: Rebbie L.S. | October 8, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
To paraphrase Michelle Obama – For the First Time In My Life, I am proud of Feminists!
It took a HUGE amount of courage for Mandel to do this. Make no mistake. I salute her. She is a HERO)ine)
Posted by: Rose | October 8, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
If you want to read and an original and intelligent take on the Sarah Palin phenomenon, check out Camille Paglia’s several observations throughout this week’s Q/A column of hers over at Salon.com. Camille is a strong Obama supporter who, nevertheless, admires Palin on several counts. Kool-Aid drinkers need not waste their time on this… It’s tough to get that Kool-Aid down when your comfortably simplistic, Party-line thinking is being challenged.
Posted by: Joey | October 8, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
We need to break this glass ceiling NOW! You go girl (PALIN) for Vice President!
Posted by: theroofsedge | October 8, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
With additional thought, I see these actions of the group as purely political. I have said long ago when Hillary and Obama were bickering that the true motives and ideas of the party will surface. I believe the support for diversity and women’s rights has been nothing but a facade for the Democratic Party to gain control over diverse groups. This is evidenced, I believe, by the ridiculing and condemnation of Sarah in what really should be celebrated as a wonderful time in our nation’s history.
Posted by: theroofsedge | October 8, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Sara Palin should not be endorsed by women just because she is a woman. She is a woman who will say whatever she is told to say. That was evidenced in her acceptance speech and her most recent accusations calling Obama, who is and has been a Christian and an American Citizen who has fought for other American citizens rights his entire life. He was 8 years old when Ayers was linked to any terrorists acts, Obama didn’t know him. His only association with him was an involvement in a volunteer committee that Ayers happened to be on. Palin knows this, yet continues to intentionally mislead the American public. She is arrogant and dangerous and yes gal. That is all.
Posted by: kdk | October 8, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
kd state in her posting: His only association with him was an involvement in a volunteer committee that Ayers happened to be on.
Oh my dear you have been misinformed Palin is hitting it on the head! They served on the Woods Fund board together for 3 years. They have appeared together on joint academic panels and Obama was appointed co-chair with Ayers of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which by the way was a disaster. Oh, let’s not forget Mike Klonsky. Research and read and you will learn so much about Obama. Personally, his politics scare me and his socialistic views of how the government will take care of me are down right wrong.
Posted by: Deegie | October 8, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
For the first time in my life, I am proud of feminists (or at least, one feminist: Shelly Mandell!)
I am a woman, and I support Palin because she is a conservative, pro-life woman! Finally we will have someone to represent US in the White House!
Posted by: Annette | October 8, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Please, please, please, educate yourselves about Obama. It is all IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. This man is not honest, and not really in favor of women or individual rights for ANYONE. He is as close to a Marxist as I have ever seen in a presidential race.
Since when did feminism equal socialism? I believe in the individual. So does Sara Palin. I believe in Choice. That means I have to give the pro-life people a choice to be pro-life, while I fight to keep my own right to choose. It is ALL about education. Make your own informed decision. Do not believe any “single ” source. There are a lot of facts available to you, Find them!
Posted by: Bonnie B Matheson | October 9, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
How can anyone associated with NOW think that this insipid, power-hungry, twangy, uninformed and classless lady be such a heroine to women. How do you think she will support women when she actually has rape victims in her state pay for their OWN RAPE KITS !!! And do people think it is somehow NOBEL that she has kept her Down’s Syndrome child and accepted the pregnancy of her daughter. That’s what any decent mother would do — that is not out of the ordinary. How sad that the woman who support her would think that she is somebdy for them. How fooled they are and how angry they must be to accept her devisive, and cruel comments of those who disagree with her.
Posted by: Karen | October 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
kdk..you have got it so right so obvious transparently right on the $$$$
Posted by: annie | October 10, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
If ever anybody doubted there’s a right-wing conspiracy going on, these pro-Palin posts should settle that question. These pro-Palin posts are absolutely nothing else but “plants” in the women’s movement, right-wing ideologues pretending to be feminists. It’s Alice in Wonderland writ large: NOTHING Is what it seems to be.
Posted by: Tobi Dragert | October 11, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
The Gods know I’m not a feminist all the way type of woman, but I still believe that things should be fair and equal FOR women. To stand up there and endorse a woman who wants to see women basically going backwards in time, is frightning. Everyone who knows Palin KNOWS that she does not represent any woman let alone the American women. My heart is pounding for you American women who could be led back to the stone age if you don’t stop McCain/Palin right now!
Posted by: Chris | October 15, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
This in fighting of yours is disgusting and makes me want to not be a woman. You think that Palin is the answer because she has breasts and a uterus? Think again. You might do well to research HER policies in her own state. To research how she has led her state to become a “state of fear”. She’s not a feminist, she’s a Christian zealot who thinks that your soldiers in Iraq are fighting a HOLY WAR. OMG how is that in any way different than a Muslim?
As for the Canadian Health Care system. Yes it has its problems, but at least if you can’t afford to pay for a doctor you still GET a doctor. If you can’t afford a room at the hospital you can still GET one. Don’t diss the Canadian system that at least TRIES to make sure everyone has access to a doctor, when so many families in your country go broke trying to get a diagnosis.
Posted by: Mary | October 15, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
…I find it hard to believe that a whole organization that is supposed to be based on the premise of women’s rights, can ban together and oppose Sarah Palin as V.P.
I also think that there are many, many more like Ms. Mandell, many women who understand Gov. Palin’s point of view even thought they may not completely share all her opinions. If anything, those of us who support Palin might question our own tendency to let her courageously voice a difficult position for us, and to let Shelley Mandell do this for us as well.
There is much to the abortion issue, including that it is being misused, that young women and men are smart enough to know that it is not the answer to many situations it is now being used for. Mother Theresa raised a valid question when she observed that a society was in trouble when its women started killing their own children.
I am proud of Sarah Palin, whose life has differed from my own in many ways, and proud also of Shelley Mandell, who brought tears to my eyes when she introduced Gov. Palin in Carson.
I just received an email from my employer, who is a woman, expecting me to forward it around about NOW opposing Sarah Palin and her candidacy, and supporting Obama. Of course I will not do that. I believe there are many women, in NOW and otherwise, who love Sarah Palin and will defend her right to participate in our democratic system and applaud Shelley Mandell for coming forward. No matter what the election result, I will always be inspired that I was able to be there to watch a historic moment. Thank you for this place to add my comments to a vital subject.
Posted by: becky person | October 16, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
lilypotter: I defy you to name one reason besides racism that you would refer to Barack Obama as a pimp. You should be ashamed. Comments like yours reveal the true colors of the McCain/Palin crowd.
Posted by: hlerkimer | October 22, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am