By Danny

Oct 2, 2008 10:50am

McCain Steps Up Insinuation Ifill Is Biased

ABC News’ Bret Hovell, Teddy Davis, Ferdous Al-Faruque Report: While appearing Thursday morning on "Fox and Friends," John McCain criticized the selection of PBS’ Gwen Ifill as moderator of the vice presidential debate because she is writing a book called "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race In The Age of Obama."

"Frankly, I wish they had picked a moderator that isn’t writing a book that is favorable to Barack Obama — I mean let’s face it," said McCain. "But I have to have confidence that Gwen Ifill will treat this as the professional journalist that she is."

"Frankly, I would imagine that there are other people out there who are not writing a book on Inauguration Day favorable to Sen. Obama," said McCain.

"But that’s life," he continued. "Life isn’t fair as I said earlier on the program. And whoever the moderator is and no matter what the questions are, it doesn’t matter because Sarah Palin is great."

McCain began raising questions about Ifill on Wednesday after the DrudgeReport linked to a story on WorldNetDaily.com questioning whether Ifill’s book would be pro-Obama. The Arizona senator said Wednesday that he did not previously know about Ifill’s book even though it had previously been reported.

While McCain began sowing doubts about Ifill during a Wednesday interview with Fox’s Carl Cameron, he did not directly question her selection as moderator until his Thursday interview with "Fox and Friends."

When the McCain campaign began insinuating bias on the part of Ifill on Wednesday, Biden spokesman David Wade reacted by describing it to ABC News’ Matt Jaffe as an effort to "work the refs".

Ifill herself weighed in Wednesday in an interview with the Associated Press.

Ifill’s book is about a new generation of black leaders, and she told the AP that she has not yet written the chapter on Obama.

She wondered why anyone would assume the book will be favorable to Obama.

"Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon when he wrote his book about Reagan?" asked Ifill, host of PBS’ "Washington Week" and senior correspondent on "The NewsHour."

Asked by AP’s David Bauder if she thought there were racial motives at play, Ifill said, "I don’t know what it is. I find it curious."

Ifill told the AP that she did not tell the Commission on Presidential Debates about the book.

User Comments

“And whoever the moderator is and no matter what the questions are, it doesn’t matter because Sarah Palin is great.”
Then why is McCain bringing it up in the first place? He sounds like an underperforming basketball player arguing calls with the refs. How about shutting up and playing ball?

Posted by: fivecard | October 2, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Apparently, it has been known since July that Gwen Ifill had written this book. Obviously McCain is very scared and desperate. He’s hoping to intimidate Ifill into throwing lollipop questions to Palin who he knows is severely vulnerable due to her lack of experience and knowledge.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 2, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

oh please. McCain camp = whiners/losers

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 2, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Another day .. another reference to race! Ha ha! It’s comical anymore – just comical!

Posted by: Marcus | October 2, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

These constant complaints about unfair press just demonstrates McCain/Palin are unfit for the White House. If you can not talk to our press without complaint, how are you going to talk with our allies who will ask tough questions and may “not be fair”. What is McCain going to say? “Sorry, PM Brown, we can not make it to the G8 Summit. Some of you are just unfair to us.”

Posted by: Paige | October 2, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

More dirty tricks from the Republicans, surprise! This book was announced in July before the McCain camp approved Ifill. We’ll be able to tell if the questions are biased. We’ll also be able to tell whether or not Palin and Biden can answer questions. Foreign policy questions are not out of bounds simply because Biden has the experience and Palin does not.

Posted by: Ready OR NOT | October 2, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This is a psychological tactic to intimidate Ifill before the debate, and also to take the attention away from Palin’s ineptitude and put it on the “liberal media” bias. It won’t work because Ifill has been known to be probing and critical of anyone she’s interviewing, no matter what party they belong to. She’ll ask tough questions of both Biden and Palin.

Posted by: Laura Brown | October 2, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

And it doesn’t matter who the moderator is. Unless he/she is obviously conservative, it just won’t do, will it? Desperate times, desperate measures…

Posted by: counting crows | October 2, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Of course McShame is going to question the moderator’s bias. He has to do anything he can to stop the debate, or question it, because Palin is such a bimbo and he picked her. “ITS ALL THEY’RE FAULT!” And to think, there was a time when people used to respect McShame.

Posted by: algwriter | October 2, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Ifill really should step down , because for some reason she will be BLAME by the Mccain camp if things dont go the way they want.
last thing you want is to give them excuses.
btw .. i just find her book deal a little weird on the release date, she is better off getting it out now. I know Its a free country and anyone can write a book.

Posted by: winston | October 2, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Ifill has been working on this book for many months. It has been public knowledge the subject matter, anticipated release date, etc. If the McCain camp is upset, they can point the finger at their own incompetence for not knowing this when they accepted the debate in the first place.

Posted by: Get Over It | October 2, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN INDEPENDENT MODERATOR. IT WOULD BE JUST AS BAD IF THEY HAD SOMEONE SUPPORTING MCCAIN DOING THE MODERATING!!! WHAT HAS HAPPENEND TO OUR MEDIA. IT SEEMS TO BE SOOO BIASED. THEY SHOULD MOVE IN WITH OBAMA!!! OOPS THEY ALREADY HAVE!!

Posted by: ELAINE | October 2, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I THINK THEY SHOULD HAVE AN INDEPENDENT MODERATOR. IT WOULD BE JUST AS BAD IF THEY HAD SOMEONE SUPPORTING MCCAIN DOING THE MODERATING!!! WHAT HAS HAPPENEND TO OUR MEDIA. IT SEEMS TO BE SOOO BIASED. THEY SHOULD MOVE IN WITH OBAMA!!! OOPS THEY ALREADY HAVE!!

Posted by: ELAINE | October 2, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I wonder HOW Sen. McCain knows that her book is “favorable to Sen. Obama”? According to the actual author – she hasn’t even written the chapter on Obama yet!! One more example of his efforts to manipulate the truth.

Posted by: shelleyt | October 2, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

A debate is a bit like a test. You prepare as much as you can and hope that you study the right stuff. The difference here is that one candidate has an advantage because of his experience. Perhaps they should change all of the questions to Alaska policy, so that Palin has a chance to shine.
You can substitute some experience with intellect. But an overall comprehension of the subject is still required. Obama is perceived to have won the foreign policy debate with McCain, despite McCain’s experience credentials.
These last minute shenanigans by the Republicans won’t be an explanation if Palin struggles. Either you know it or you don’t. If all the questions are about Troopergate and her pregnant daughter, then maybe they’ll have a point.
Til then it’s time to see what gaps the VP candidates have…

Posted by: No Excuses | October 2, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Correct me if I am wrong but isn’t Tom Brokaw moderating McCain’s next debate? Brokaw obviously favors McCain. Fat chance McCain will object to Brokaw who has been anything but neutral the last few weeks.

Posted by: Jackson in NC | October 2, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Based on these requirements, Oscar the Grouch from Sesame Street could not even moderate this debate. Oscar has a book, WHICH WITCH IS WHICH?, and since Palin had the Kenyan witch doctor pray over her to protect her from witches – this would clearly be a conflict of Interest.

Posted by: Get Real | October 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

First the republicans complained about how unfair Palin’s interview were, now they are preparing for another excuse when Palin bombs tonight by setting the stage with Gwen Ifill. Ifill is a professional, she has been in the business for years, and she knows how to separate opinion from facts. Just because someone writes about an individual doesn’t mean he or she takes his or her side. It is also nonsense that Ifill will use the debate to sell more copies of her book. She certainly hasn’t done this in the past. If the republicans want to complain about biased news, they should first talk about FOX NEWS. However, most important, the republicans are only making a big deal of this so they can fall back on it if Palin bombs. This tells us how little faith they really have with her.

Posted by: The Unshrub | October 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

John McCain recognized the corruption in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac years ago. He supported legislation to address the corruption in these institutions. Democrats in Congress stopped it. They said there was no corruption. Obama didn’t open his mouth on the subject The Obama-media is ignoring this little fact. Please spread the word among your family and friends, and ask them to do the same. The Obama-media will never tell Americans the truth. If the legislation to corral Fannie and Freddie had succeeded, we would not be spending $700Billion to bail out Wall Street. McCain made the right call in 2005; Obama was silent.

Posted by: Ex Democrat | October 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

What I hear is a presidential nominee who has become unsure of his vp pick. The rest is noise.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 2, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Is this indicative of how McCain will lead the country? He does no research ahead of time, even though all of the information is there for him, and then he will tell us that he is getting a bad deal.
Everyone is out to get him. Sound like the clown we have in office now. 4 more years!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 2, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

The release date of the book was not controlled by the author, it was decided upon by the publisher. And many other people in the media have written books, it does not lessen their ability to moderate a debate fairly. I doubt if anyone would be acceptable to McCain’s people at this point. But, since Ms. Palin is an “expert” in so many key areas, she should have no problem with the tough questions any professional moderator should ask in such a critical debate for high office of the USA.

Posted by: shelleyt | October 2, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

We all know that Ifill’s book is favorable to Obama because of its title:
“The Breakthrough: Politics and Race In The Age of Obama.” She thinks Obama’s candidacy is a “breakthrough,” which means thinks it is positive. “Breakthrough” is an inherently positive term. Ifill has Obama’s name in the title. Who actually believes she hasn’t written the “Obama” chapter yet? Her credibility is gone.

Posted by: tina | October 2, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I get to referee my son’s wrestling match tonight – can’t wait .. guess who is gonna win?

Posted by: Rick | October 2, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Laura said it correctly:
This is a psychological tactic to intimidate Ifill before the debate.
Tom Brokaw is the NBC liason for McCain campaign. He is the one moderating the next Presidential debate but I don’t hear Obama complaining about it.
Just look at the difference between these two Presidential candidates. One is whining like a child while the other one is already showing that he is strong and ready to go into white house.
McCain is such a pathetic fool.

Posted by: RJ2008 | October 2, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I have never seen a campaign that whined at every turn like McCain/Palin. Either she is qualified or not? Didn’t Palin say Hillary’s “whining” turned her off? Talk about setting expectations low. Now the moderator, approved by both campaigns, is “in the tank”. Gimme break!
“in the tank” is the new “flip flop” for the Republicans. A sound bite the public will repeat. Hopefully, we don’t fall for the marketing spin again.

Posted by: Nation of Whiners | October 2, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

It is so sad that the people of our country have stooped to this level. No qualified, upstanding, right age person will ever run for President anymore after all this garbage. Our country is being mocked right now, campaign and financing adding to the ammunition of skeptics. We need to get back to what our country was founded on. If God doesn’t do something about this nation, he will have to repent for destroying Noah’s generation, because sin doth much more abound at present than then. No need to say more!!

Posted by: jhanks | October 2, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Obama extends hand and McCain offred a chilly look. Check this out:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/02/mccain-chilly-to-obama-on_n_131126.html

Posted by: RJ2008 | October 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

tina, even the Republicans think Obama’s campaign is a breakthrough. He’s the first African American candidate to win a major party nomination.

Posted by: huh? | October 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

“”Frankly, I wish they had picked a moderator”
The FACT is the moderator was approved by McCain. The FACT is that this book was no secret. It appears that McCain had to count on random websites to figure this out a bare couple days before the debate.
Is this the guy you want sitting across the table from Putin or crafting treaties to protect our intellectual property from Chinese industrial espionage? His political incompetence is appalling, as president it would be dangerous.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

mccain knows palin could totally blow this up
and if she does blow it up, she blows him up with her
so its nice to have a safetynet that can keep you alive
yesterday he said she would do a good job
today hes saying she should have been replaced
i mean hes even flipping on small issues whats going on
john your campaign said ok to this moderator
the book was made public weeks before she was selected
is your campaign so inept that it cant do the basic of basic research? i mean is that why you have sarah palin on the ticket?
wow just pathetic
that this guy is running for office, he has no idea what hes doing

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

This is yet another McCain campaign ploy. If Sarah fails to answer any questions or sounds like her Couric interview, he will use this as the reason why. He is making the expectations for her even lower. Any black person in this position will play it straight because the LAST THING they want to be accused of is being bias and support a an untrue stereotype. This is what the repupblican campaign is all about folks, gimmicks and lies. How can any one seriously consider voting for them?

Posted by: CitizenAJ | October 2, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Cmon kool-aid drinkers .. if the shoe was on the other foot you wouldn’t say something about it? Get real .. she has a financial interest in him doing well (Obama). Stop your nonsense ..

Posted by: Biden's Hair Helmet | October 2, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Remember when Palin called Hillary Clinton a whiner? Ironic that McCain/Palin campaign has been whining since day one after she was picked as VP. Funny stuff, that irony thing :)

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 2, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

I wish the McCain backers would listen to themselves , saying that he tried to stop this fiasco is like saying he knew the brakes were bad on the church bus before it went over the cliff , read the bill , it wasnt his , it went no where

Posted by: hicktick | October 2, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

The McCain camp kicked a very popular journalist, Dowd, off thier plane leaving her stranded in PA. Dowd is an equal opportunity offender. She plays favorites to no one.
McCain was grumpy, at best with the Iowa Paper Editorial Board. It’s on video for all to witness.
The McCain camp calls out Couric and a voter who asked a question and wanted an answer of “gotcha’ journalism”.
Now the McCain campaign is crying foul over a (dare I say it?) black, female respected journalist they failed to properly vet prior to accepting the debate.
The McCain campaign makes a mistake and blames it on everybody else. When they blamed Palin’s contradictory answer on Pakistan on the voter who asked the question, enough is enough.

Posted by: Paige | October 2, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

tina: “Her credibility is gone.”
Spoken like a true neocon, who doesn’t trust their own ability to watch the debate and judge for themselves if it is biased. It’s not like the moderator scores it, and it will be clear if Obama is getting softballs while Palin is getting beaned. As is well known, Obama has handled bean balls in the primary debate at the hands of Clinton’s pal – is Palin just not up to it?

Posted by: jhw539 | October 2, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Another gamble from McCain…just draws attention to their nerves. Set the bar low and hope she exceeds.

Posted by: Ploys | October 2, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Oh oh. Another flip-flop. Yesterday he said he felt she could be fair and unbiased. Less than 24 hours later, he says she can’t? Which is it McLame? The right spin machine is in full gear and we are still hours away from the VP debate. This would be laughable if it weren’t so serious!

Posted by: Sharon | October 2, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Biden’s Hair Helmet : “if the shoe was on the other foot you wouldn’t say something about it?”
The shoe has been on the other foot – the Clinton/Obama primary debate moderated by Stephanopoulos. Obama supports based their complaints on the actual questions asked – you know, reality – and then explored possible bias to explain them. Compare that to, a bare couple days before the debate, complaining about the moderator due to the book that was public knowledge when McCain agreed she was a good choice.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 2, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

As an Obama supporter, what I fear here is that, as usually happens when the US media is accused of “liberal” bias, the media will move to the right in response to the accusations.
Look for moderator-bias AGAINST Biden at the tonight’s debate.

Posted by: Leroy Q | October 2, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Tom Brokaw is acting as a liaison to the McCain camp for the network. He will moderate an upcoming debate. Fox will (NOT) report on this issue. Obama has not whined.
Another diversion from McCain.

Posted by: C'Mon | October 2, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

McCain, It is not summer anymore … take off your flip-flops

Posted by: PaulinVanc | October 2, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Maybe He knows that this moderator isn’t going to let her get away with non answers, and knows she doesn’t know squat about the issues and policies this country needs to change like gaining the respect of the world again and bringing home manufacturing jobs back to this country and not let them be where whey are.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 2, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

mccain is already making excuses for the –DIPSY TWIT

Posted by: rodney | October 2, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Neither Obama nor McCain is fit for president, given their bailout by voting for the bailout. Shows little difference between how they will govern – the govt will mess things up (Fannie, Freddie, etc), and then provide the “solution” by taking money from taxpayers against their will. The 3rd party Constitution Party never looked so attractive as now.

Posted by: JoeCitizen | October 2, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Imagine that the MSM is somehow blaming McCain for Ifill be an ethically challenged debate moderator.

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Nothing is ever right for McCainPalin, is it? There always has to be an excuse-in-advance if Palin doesn’t do well tonight.

Posted by: holly | October 2, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

I like her and don’t believe that she would be biased but they shouldve never chosen her in the first place its going to play into the republicans the media is against sara palin bs.

Posted by: b | October 2, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

That’s okay. every time the moderator asks Palin a questions, the McCain camp can just send a mountain of thank you’s to the moderator and escort her out the door just like they DO the media everytime the media asks Palin a question.

Posted by: mere | October 2, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

This just shows how McCain would run his White House, loose cannon.
The info has been out there since June that she was writing this book, it was in the AP news. It was also noted again in August.
I guess since he did not vet Palin, and did not study who would moderate the debate, this shows more of his lack of leadership and focus.
By him saying ANYTHING about it now only goes to cloud his lack of foresight and leadership to run a campaign let alone this country.

Posted by: Mike | October 2, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I hate you repiglican sons a bitches… i really do… they knew damn well about this book… you know what: McCain is a babykilling piece of angry old man wealthy garbage and Sarah Palin is an idjit… McCain’s Trophy VP candidate is not working nearly as well as he had “hoped” so now it’s time call out the attack dogs on the Fourth Estate (of which Sarah P used to be a paid member)… as the ol man Bush once said when he realized Clinton was kicking his a**: “they can feel it slipping away….”
http://www.savagerun.com

Posted by: gerald clough | October 2, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Dude, you had a say in who moderates the debates. Get over it.

Posted by: HeidiL | October 2, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Hey Rick, just because you are dishonest doesn’t mean everyone is.
To everyone else, look, the ‘Age of Obama’ thing will still be accurate even if McCain were to win. Perceptions of politics for many black people are being changed right now. How many people call themselves Goldwater Republicans, regardless of the fact that he didn’t win? The book aims to be about black politicians, of which Obama is the most recognizable and the one with the greatest aspirations.
I do think it is fair to watch for bias, however, it might also be worth looking at her history. Does she have a history of bias? If so, you’ve got a possible case. If not, perhaps people should just wait and see instead of giving in to paranoia about the media.
A thing to remember, a hard question is not the same as a biased question. No vice president should have softball questions. The vice president, in addition to other duties, may become president; we all know this. With that in mind, we need to see if they are really capable of handling things, if the need were to arise.

Posted by: Apriori | October 2, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

remember these comments by Obama supporters back in April after the PA Democratic debate?????
“Shame on you ABC so called news (what a joke)! Shame on you! Why in the first place would you have a former employee of the Clintons “moderating” this lynching? Shame on you”
and
I always admired Charles Gibson and chose to watch his national news show every evening. After last night’s embarrassing debacle, I’ll rethink that. Both he and Stephanapoulos sounded like gossip columnists, only interested in the superficial and incendiary. How could they sink so low? Did someone tell them to ask those ridiculous questions? The only one who kept his dignity was Obama.
You know what. This poster was right about Charlie Gibson. Except the Obamabots didn’t complain about his hatchet job on Palin.

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I think McCain is just hurting himself further by acknowledging his campaign staff didn’t know about this book.
The perceptions that are dragging McCain down are 1) that he lacks appropriate temperament, and 2) that he’s reckless and erratic, and thus flies by the seat of his pants.
This acknowledgement that he got blindsided again just plays to that second negative perception.
I think McCain’s staff should have advised him to suck it up. The gain by playing the “media don’t like me” card is less than the loss of acknowledging you don’t know what’s happening around you.
Besides, whether Palin does okay or not will have little to do with the moderator.

Posted by: Paul | October 2, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Sarah’s answers will include: “When congress wanted to give me that money for the Bridge to No Where, I told congress Thanks but No Thanks!”
Biden’s reply should be: “But Sarah, you still took the money from Congress and built that ‘ROAD TO NO WHERE’. People on that Island have to travel on broken down roads to get to and from work, and to do their regular errands, While your ‘Road to No Where’ Leads to no where.

Posted by: mere | October 2, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

The bitter tone of these comments posted by a bunch of miserable people disheartening. They serve no purpose. My guess is the dem’s want the popular vote to win so we wouldn’t have a repeat of 2000. The rep’s want the representation doctrine to remain. Why not let the top vote getter become president and the runner up become vice president? Maybe everyone won’t be so bitter.
McCain Want’s more Gov’t oversight. For what? Maybe the gov’t could keep up with how many houses he owns.
Palin can see Russia from Alaska and now she knows how to deal with them?
Obama wants every one to have the same amount of assets.
Biden has made millions over his career and has none of it left. And he would be a good person to protect your money?
As for the Senate and Congress Why would anyone vote for an incumbant?
Sheep
None are even remotely qualified.
America deserves better.

Posted by: ed w | October 2, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I find Shelleyt’s comment so fascinating. If one is capable of the slightest reflection of American history one would have to say that it is a “breakthrough” for African-Americans demonstrated by Obama and other African Americans identified in Ifill’s book to be in their current places in the political landscape relative to the historical position of African-Americans and other minorities. You could replace the words African-American with gender and Obama with Hilary Clinton and have the same implication that there has been a “breakthrough”. Something tells me that such a book by a moderator would not be viewed as favoring the woman. Finally, by the way, how could Ifill have finished the chapter on Obama??

Posted by: peggyj | October 2, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Ridiculous. The book is not about Obama, as has been reported everywhere by now. This is just an attempt to intimidate Ifill.
McCain, once again working the refs.
Don’t be intimidated Gwen!
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-and-couric-on-gotcha-journalism.html
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
McCain and Couric Spar on Gotcha Journalism
COURIC: Over the weekend, Gov. Palin, you said the U.S. should absolutely launch cross-border attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan to, quote, “stop the terrorists from coming any further in.” Now, that’s almost the exact position that Barack Obama has taken and that you, Sen. McCain, have criticized as something you do not say out loud. So, Gov. Palin, are you two on the same page on this?
MCCAIN: Now, just a minute, Katie. I have to step in here. That’s another example of the media’s “gotcha journalism”…
COURIC: But, it was a question from a citizen. How is a citizen asking a candidate a question an example of what you call “gotcha journalism?”
MCCAIN: Because it was hard, Katie.
We don’t want Gov. Palin to be asked questions, unless she is prepared for them. When she is prepared, as she will be before the debate, she sounds intelligent, knowledgeable and feisty. But when she has not been prepared, she sounds lost and incoherent.
We can’t have people asking her questions before she has had time to be prepared with an answer.
COURIC: But, Sen. McCain, I have to say, you are 72-years old. Actuarial preditions show that if you were to be elected, Gov. Palin would have a 1 in 5 chance of actually becoming President. These are perilous times–unprecedented crises in financial markets, tensions across a wide range of critical foreign policy arenas. Shouldn’t we have a Vice President, and a potential President, who actually understands these issues, beyond the preparation necessary for a debate?
Here is her response to a question on the economy, a critical issue, you would agree, Sen. McCain:

COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it’s got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.

COURIC: That answer, Sen. McCain, as noted by Fareed Zakaria, is incoherent.
MCCAIN: Yes. (nodding his head, smiling).
COURIC: Well, isn’t it actually important that a potential President actually comprehend issues? That is, beyond debate preparation?
MCCAIN: No, Katie. That’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism”. It’s obvious from these prior interviews that Palin has little to no comprehension of fiscal policy and economics. For heaven’s sake, she received a “D” in macroeconomics in college! And, as I’ve said in the past, I have little understanding of economic issues myself.
No, what’s important, Katie, is that she sound like she understands the issues. In the debate. If she is sufficiently prepared, she can give an illusion of understanding the issues–even if she is only giving answers with the prepared and practiced spontaneity and content necessary to give that illusion force.
Given that the bar is set at the lowest standard imaginable, Katie, if she accompanies that performance with sufficient charm, we believe that media will follow, into focusing on the change from that low standard, and on those superficial entertainment values–you know, Katie, (McCain smiles through tight lips and squinting eyes and moves his hands up and down)–”She certainly appears to be more confident tonight; she appears more poised, coherent, humorous”–rather than her readiness to be President from an objective standard. After all, using the more important standard of Presdidential capability, she has already demonstrated that she is unprepared to be President.
So, Katie, we want them to focus on that difference, on her debate preparation, rather than on her actual well-demonstrated Presidential unreadiness. And that’s what I mean by “gotcha journalism.”
KATIE: But if I understand you correctly, Sen. McCain, you actually believe that it’s not important that she understand the issues actually facing the nation…
MCCAIN: Right.(nodding)
COURIC: On which many people’s very jobs, health and life will rely at this critical time…
MCCAIN: Yes.
COURIC: And that all that really matters is creating a standard so low that she actually is rewarded for her widely seen and repeatedly demonstrated lack of knowledge and understanding. That we would be using what is essentially a remedial standard for Presidential capability–rather than one of actual capability.
Sen. McCain, you seem to be actually suggesting that we should decide that she is ready for the Presidency, simply because, after preparation, she has improved. Even though just days earlier, time after time, she was unable to give coherent answers on these subjects.
No one can gain Presidential-level understanding in days. And in the office of the Presidency, with its intense crises and unforseeable events, she will not be prepared for each unpredictable day, as she was for the debate.
Yet you expect media to focus on these values, rather than actual readiness to be President. That’s what you mean by “gotcha journalism”?
MCCAIN: Exactly. And they will. Katie, I would say to the media: Once again–we “gotcha” to lower the bar. We “gotcha” to set expectations far below those actually required for a President. We “gotcha” to focus on characteristics unrelated to Presidential capability, and to ignore her statements on these issues made only days earlier–as if a few days of debate preparation can erase a glaring and dangerous actual lack of knowledge and preparedness. Yes, indeed–we “gotcha”. (smiles).
COURIC: How can you expect the media to fall for that?
MCCAIN: It worked for Bush.
Cite:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-and-couric-on-gotcha-journalism.html

Posted by: Jana Walker | October 2, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Pa. Debate, The Clear Loser Is ABC
ABC News moderators Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos seemed to be playing a game of gotcha at last night’s candidates’ debate. (By Matt Rourke — Associated Press)
When Barack Obama met Hillary Clinton for another televised Democratic candidates’ debate last night, it was more than a step forward in the 2008 presidential election. It was another step downward for network news — in particular ABC News, which hosted the debate from Philadelphia and whose usually dependable anchors, Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, turned in shoddy, despicable performances.
when it comes to debate moderators there are NO BIGGER WHINERS THAN OBAMA SUPPORTERS – ESPECIALLY THOSE IN THE MSM. Hypocrites!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Gwen Ifill is one of the most professional and in my opinion trustworthy reporters/commentators since the likes of Walter Cronkite. If the McCain camp has reservations then me thinks it has more to do with protecting Palin than it does with projecting her abilities in this arena.
For me, it’s go Joe and for gosh sakes, take off the gloves!!

Posted by: NYGranny | October 2, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Change the headline ABC. “McCain posturing to make it look unfair when she does poorly.”

Posted by: Sandra | October 2, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

being a woman, Ifill can be bias towards Palin as she is a woman too. We don’t see that point of view? Or is it that McCain camp only uses the gender perspective when its beneficial to them?

Posted by: Faiz | October 2, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Everyone in our Nation has an opinion. Gwen’s book was all over the press when it was announced at the end of July. There was an article in Time and Newsweek and Double Day did a huge press roll out. You can Google her and and her book pops up. The McCain campaign is just trying to cover themselves if Sara Palin does poorly in tonights debates.

Posted by: kent | October 2, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Washington Post television critic Tom Shales, in an April 17 article headlined “In Pa. Debate, The Clear Loser Is ABC,” described the debate as “another step downward for network news — in particular ABC News, which hosted the debate from Philadelphia and whose usually dependable anchors, Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, turned in shoddy, despicable performances.” Shales added that the debate “dwelled entirely on specious and gossipy trivia” and “seemed slanted against Obama.”
Time magazine’s Michael Grunwald, in an April 17 article headlined “The Democrats Play Trivial Pursuit,” wrote, “Obama’s memoir dripped with contempt for modern gotcha politics, for a campaign culture obsessed with substantively irrelevant but supposedly symbolic gaffes,” and added, “Last night at the National Constitution Center, at a Democratic debate that was hyped by ABC as a discussion of serious constitutional issues, America got to see exactly what Obama was complaining about.”
In an April 16 article on Editor & Publisher’s website, Greg Mitchell wrote, “In perhaps the most embarrassing performance by the media in a major presidential debate in years, ABC News hosts Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos focused mainly on trivial issues as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama faced off in Philadelphia. They, and their network, should hang their collective heads in shame.”
In an April 16 entry on The Denver Post’s Off the Record blog, Joanne Ostrow wrote of the debate, “The media has driven the obsession with gaffes, an obsession that cuts against all three presidential candidates. With endless hours to fill, cable in particular fans the flames, keeps petty spats alive and refuses to let go when there’s a hint of controversy.” She added, “Blame ABC and Charlie Gibson for running a taped question from a Pennsylvania voter of whether or not Obama loves the American flag. This impugning of the candidate’s patriotism is a red herring fueled by the network running the debate. Even as it was broadcast, you could feel a national sense of dread over how many hours will be devoted to flag pins in the weeks ahead.”
Obamanation a cult of whiners

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

McCain will stop at nothing – even to discredit a journalist with an impeccable record for his own personal gain. What an insular small minded fool. Senator McCain and Sarah Palin are two of the MOST un-presidential candidates ever on public display.

Posted by: Libratine | October 2, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Why is McCain looking more and more frustrated everyday? Is it because of the poll numbers? or is it because he thought that Palin was intelligent enough to use the facts and figures fed into her but instead she just spills them out like sentences to nowhere without even understanding what she is saying? Or is it because the “Quick Learner” is looking more like a Bimbo in her preparations for tonights debate and having tough time restoring and retrieving Gigabytes of data in her kilobyte head?

Posted by: Faiz | October 2, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

It’s a good thing to get this out in the open before the debate. At least the truth is known by all. Frankly, I don’t believe that there are any good media moderators out there who would be fair anyway. Sarah Palin has been the target of a hateful press even before she was selected to be VP. Just ask those Alaskans who got punked by her and lost their free lunch.

Posted by: Wild | October 2, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Mccain refers that “They” chose her. They includes him. He as a candidate could have vetoed her, but did not. I guess that thye think Palin will do bad tonight and have to blame it on somebody. Typical republican mantra of blame the MSM

Posted by: Economic warrior | October 2, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Tonight’s debate will decide if Alaska will be Red or Blue on November 4.

Posted by: Faiz | October 2, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Wasn’t he asked a question about the Ifill situation, and so he answered it with a “I don’t like it … but have to have confidence she’ll do a good job … it’s not fair, but it won’t matter.” What should he have said? “Of no – there’s no problem?”. It’s one thing to surmise that a moderator leans towards Obama (ex, Brian Williams), but when there’s an actual book talking about the “the age of obama” it’s a different issue, or at least raises the question fairly. Would anyone buy Keith Olbermann as a fair moderator? How about Matthews? How about Hannity? No – b/c their “personal opinions” are all public. What’s not known, but is questioned, is whether Ifill’s preferences are about to become public and whether that’s a factor. IT would be for Keith, Chris, and Sean. Why not Gwen?

Posted by: Rep | October 2, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

geevill – It has been known for many months Ifill is writing this book. The subject matter, anticipated release date has been out there long before the debate commission asked her to do this debate.
If the McCain camp is so worried about her, Why did they accept this debate with Ifill as moderator in the first place?

Posted by: Paige | October 2, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Both the Democratic and Republican ticket signed off on Ifill. If the Republicans did not do thier homework and find out she had a bokk coming out with Obama’s name on the cover…then tough!! from my understanding, the book is not even totally about Obama…it is about the rise of young African-American who do not follow in the course as Al Sharpton or Jesse Jacksons.
But, McCain would choose to bring this up one day before the debate…why not bring it up last week or the week before. I guess this was the October Suprise everyone has been talking about. Such whining and complaining on the Republican side.

Posted by: Francheska Georgia | October 2, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Gwen Ifill is a professional. I have no doubt about her ability and sense of fairness. She is great and I love her.
The problem is that the Obama/Biden ticket is the weakest that the Democratic party could have had. Ever since the party leaders disgustingly pushed Hillary Clinton out, I have been a supporter of John McCain and will be voting for McCain/Palin in Novemeber. Regardless of Palin’s debate performance, I will vote for McCain/Palin.
By the way, if we all watched the same presidential debate, McCain won the first one by a knock-out!
A disgusted Democrat for McCain
Hillary 2012

Posted by: Evans | October 2, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Is John McCain trying to tell us that he can’t be trusted to make any decisions?
He demanded that the time given to the VP candidates be made shorter and that the candidates would not be allowed to have any communication with each other.
In doing so he is telling us that he doesn’t believe his pick for VP can be expected to behave like an adult.
He also agreed last month to Gwen Ifill as moderator. No new information has arisen since he made that decision.
If he doesn’t even trust his own decision making, I don’t think we should either.

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 2, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

To Shelley T.
Do u disagree that FINALLY having a black presidential nominee is a BREAKTHROUGH? having a Female VP nominee is also a BREAKTHROUGH!! so why is it that she has to be partial? and the fact that Obama is now the most known of the black politicians it makes the most sense.
To Rick.
you can be the ref to your sons matches all day…but theres nothing you can do as the ” Ref /moderator” to cover up a WHOOPIN!!

Posted by: Jakjup | October 2, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

This idiot can not be trusted, he lies so much. Now I ain’t crazy, I know I saw an interview he gave not more than 2 days ago where he said “She was a professional, and had a record of being bias, and he would confident that she would continue to be so.” Now that’s what somebody told me or something I read on the internet, but I saw it come out of his mouth. The only time McSame ain’t lieing is when his lips are not moving. He will do anything and say anything to be President. He don’t care about integrity and honesty. He will jump on any bandwagon. Well McSame, as far as I am concerned you can jump off a bridge, and I pray the American People continue to see you for what you are; a political opportunists who has not conscious or scrupulous. You would repeat anything and say anything to serve your own purpose.

Posted by: SD | October 2, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Gwen Ifill has “lost all credibility?” Are you kidding me? She is one of the most highly-respected journalists in the field, with a reputation for even-handed reporting. Even assuming, arguendo, that she favors Obama, she’s definitely not going to blow that reputation by using her “moderator powers” to make Sarah Palin “look bad.” But, if the McCain camp is uncomfortable with her, let’s send George Will instead. He’s certainly not “in the tank” for Obama, but do you honestly think having him as moderator would give any advantage to Sarah Palin?

Posted by: Hils | October 2, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

The shameless John “Don’t forget I’m a POW” McCain’s political success to date is a direct result of a fawning media that fell for his line of “maverick” crap for far too long. To now try to blame his hapless campaign’s problems on the “biased media” is laughable. McCain earned our respect and honor long ago but his behavior in this campaign is not honorable and deserves no respect. Mark my words, when he loses on November he’ll blame the skirt he’s been hiding behind for the last few weeks–Sarah. What a whiner!

Posted by: Ricardo | October 2, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

1. John McCain has known that Ifill is writing this book for months.
2. John McCain also approved of Ifill as the moderator.
3. Who says Ifill’s book about a new generation of black politicians is partisan?
It is clear that John McCain is putting pressure on Ifill before the debate. Shame on John McCain!

Posted by: Sanjoy Das | October 2, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

This is just a game by McCain. If someone like Brit Hume was the moderator they would have no excuse when everyone again sees she doesn’t have an understanding of the issues.
I have sort of become to feel sorry for Palin in the way she is treated, not by the media, but her own campaign. McCain is more of the same. Fundamentally McCain is really a jerk, he has been a jerk since high school and he still hasn’t grown up. He is a hyped up navy brat who hasn’t changed the way he treats people.
He brushed off Obama yesterday because he knows he is about to go hyper-negative and he couldn’t look the guy in the face. Nothing worse than a desparate bully, the next few days are going to be ugly and McCain will stoop to new lows which would have seemed a ludricrous statement after his behavior the last few weeks.

Posted by: Carl | October 2, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“Tina”: re: We all know that Ifill’s book is favorable to Obama because of its title:
“The Breakthrough: Politics and Race In The Age of Obama.” She thinks Obama’s candidacy is a “breakthrough,” which means thinks it is positive. “Breakthrough” is an inherently positive term. Ifill has Obama’s name in the title. Who actually believes she hasn’t written the “Obama” chapter yet? Her credibility is gone.
THIS BOOK IS A LOOK AT THE AMERICAN CULTURE SINCE THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT. THE SMALL PIECE ON OBAMA HAS NOT BEEN WRITTEN YET AND IS NOT KNOWN WHETHER IT IS FAVORABLE OR NOT. THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE DISCUSSED IN THE BOOK OF WHICH OBAMA IS BUT ONE. IT IS YOU WHO MAKE ASSUMPTIONS WITHOUT KNOWING THE FACTS.
IF BROKAW WRITES A BOOK ON THE WAR MCCAIN WAS IN, SHOULD WE ASSUME HE IS MORE FAVOURABLE TO MCCAIN, WHITES AND THAT GENERATION??? WHAT DO YU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THAT AND ALSO THE FACT HE HAS BEEN A MODERATOR BETWEEN THE NETWORK AND MCCAIN’S CAMPAIGN – THAT IS AN ACTUAL FACT AND FAR WORSE. I HOPE YOU REGISTER YOUR COMPLAINT ABOUT BROKAW. OTHERWISE, WE CAN SEE THAT THE RIGHT IS CLEARLY MILKING THIS IFILL THING AND THROWING UP FALSE ACCUSATIONS.

Posted by: jt1 | October 2, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

McCain got his 84 millions from the US Dept. of Treasury. With the economic downturn, Sen. Obama’s camp, relying on donors like you and me, will be hurt. We are in the last days of campaign. This election is not locked in yet. Let’s all give Sen. Obama one last push by donating $5, $10,… $50 whatever you can. We must not let our nation to fall into the disastrous hands of McCain. You can skip a cup of coffee, or a movie. Please help yourself (big!) and your country by helping Sen. Obama to win this race.
http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

Posted by: leighg1 | October 2, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

How did the GOP let this happen? What are they doing down there that makes them too busy to check out Ifill. Let me guess. . . the same staff member who vetted Palin checked out Ifill. With her book being released on inauguration day she has a major financial stake in who wins this election. Maybe the McCain camp should have brought this up earlier, but there is essentially no difference between this, and if she had gone to Vegas and dropped 500k on Obama to win. Of course there is a conflict of interest. How naive can you be to think there isn’t.
In this financial crisis, wouldn’t it have been great to have Romney instead of Palin battling Biden tonight. He would wipe the floor with Biden on economics. She’s become the drag on the ticket, and we haven’t even seen her debate yet. Hoping for mere survival, but expecting the worst.

Posted by: Present | October 2, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

When McCain says, “She[Palin] is great.”, he loses all credibility because she does not speak like she is ‘great.’ Remember she was elected governer of Alaska by less than 16,000 votes (205,042 total votes casted). Her approval rating has dropped 20 plus points in the State of Alaska since being named VP running mate.
Palin is just average. She needs to start speaking like a stateswoman, not like she is at a family picnic talking to Uncle George.
Step up to the plate Sarah and don’t give material to be punchs line for jokes around the water cooler.
We Americans need to get it right this time.
Remember, G.W. Bush was a guy we all wanted to have a beer with. Ninety-plus months later, look where we are.
Substance does matter.
Tonight you [Palin] needs to put up or shut up.

Posted by: Kenneth of Minneapolis | October 2, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Iffel is supposed to be a professional! It was her responsability to recuse herself WHEN ASKED!!!!! Failure to do so says SHE IS NOT PROFESSIONAL AT ALL!!!

Posted by: lovingpolitics | October 2, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I hear worry in GOP land.

Posted by: C'Mon | October 2, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Please Gwen Ifill Bias!
YEAH!

Posted by: Melissa | October 2, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I fell sorry for McCain/McSAME -NOT!

Posted by: GHM | October 2, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Ifill’s really very professional and both camps are fortunate to have her as the moderator. Only Michelle Malkin-tent, a faux journalist, and her ilk would raise this as an issue. Lucky for Governor Palin that the late Tim Russert isnt’ the moderator!

Posted by: 63tango | October 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

She is going to do a good job. Gwen Ifill has always been very objective and balanced, she does great work at PBS.
PBS Public Broadcasting Service not Corporate Broadcasting Service like at Fox News, CBS news, MSNBC, CNN and ABC news.

Posted by: Sense | October 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

palin says she is eager to debate since the media has been censoring her
LOL what?
first off, she is hidden away except for these softball interviews
and if they didnt edit up some of her remarks we would only see two answers teh whole show
and by answers i mean ludicrous rambling that answers nothing

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 2, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Is this a poly to cancel to try to train her more. The McCain knew about the book already. She hadn’t made a secret out of it either as reported by the AP News: “Ifill discussed it with Howard Kurtz last month in the Washington Post, in the only profile she’s done before the debate. (And I’d imagine someone in the campaign should have read it).”
Can’t cancel…we need to laugh at the trained puppy. Just don’t ask her to explain anything…I will need to be in the bathroom watching television is she has to clarify anything…LoL

Posted by: Art_Frost | October 2, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Biden will hopefully avoid the temptation to create a Palin loss.
Biden should simply focus on his own answers, period. Because the simple fact is that Palin has defined herself already, and whether she does okay or not tonight won’t change that definition – when conservative columnists call for the Republican running mate to drop off the ticket for babbling, its done.
But if Biden tries to exploit the babble, or lead Palin into a new line of babble, he’ll make the storyline about him.
I’d advise Biden to do nothing toward Palin. If she attacks him, simply offer a response. Maybe throw in a couple of barbs about McCain’s positions and statements. But say nothing about Alaska, Putin flying over, newspapers, etc.

Posted by: Paul | October 2, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Sense, I complained about her after
a comment that she made about Clinton.
So she is just as Biased as the rest.

Posted by: Melissa | October 2, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

No one said it’s favorable to Obama it’s what’s at stake for her his win means a hell of a lot more money for her. For all we know biden already has the questions. Another piece of Chicago politics at work. On the economy Take a look in your driveways and if it’s not American made then blame yourself not Bush but then I forgot or great people of Michigan won’t even buy the cars they make so I guess that shows that the unions protect sub par workers that can’t even thank for themselves the union has to tell them who to vote for. Help America and kill the unions they have out lived their usefulness.

Posted by: Iserv4JC | October 2, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I don’t hear Obama complaining because the format was changed in favor of Palin or the fact that Tom Brokaw is the liaison between NBC and McCain. Brokaw is suppose to insure that McCain gets treated fair by NBC. I’m so sick of it all. I can’t wait for Nov 4th.

Posted by: Tina, NC | October 2, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

If Palin is great why is McCain talking about Ifill. They knew in advance she was going to be the moderator. What McCain is not say is that he made a poor choice/bad judgement. Palin interview with Couric is very clear to us, her knowledge is limited, presently we’re in a financial crisis, she is a heartbeat away from being President, is she qualified. I don’t think so. Knowledge is power and trying to cram too many thing at once can be a disaster for her and thats what the McCain team is trying to do. Palin should gracefully drop out .

Posted by: Randy | October 2, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

fivecard: Because she shouldn’t be the moderator in the first place writing a book on blacks. Obama is half black and Biden is his VP. I don’t like the idea myself because blacks are usually for their own and she could set Palin up for a downfall. If that happens she should never be a moderator again.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 2, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

FYI —– Geevil is a well known troll on this blog-site and has no credibility whatsoever. I recommend just ignoring it.

Posted by: Independant Woman, Texas | October 2, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

And I suppose that every white guy journalist who has written books about all the other white guys in politics should be assumed to be biased in favor of all the white candidates, including Sarah Palin? Give me a break, McCain.

Posted by: jackie | October 2, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Sanjoy Das: “It is clear that John McCain is putting pressure on Ifill before the debate. Shame on John McCain!”
Pressure on Ifill to do what? Ask softball questions like, “what newspapers do you read?”

Posted by: Paul | October 2, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

all in favor of Sean Hannity moderating the next presidential debate say yes….i thought so

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Randy: Your talking about qualifications. Bush, Carter, Reagan, Clinton all governors. Who knew what would happen when they were elected president? No one. That’s the chance in elections. Obama is the won with no experience, Palin was mayor then governor running the whole state. What makes Obama so experienced? Nothing. He is a know nothing, do nothing and say nothing unless it is copied from another’s speech. Governor’s know more about politics than Obama hasn’t learned yet.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 2, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

name one thing that obama has actually run successfully..paper route, corner store, online trading, anthing.
the community he organized is still in poverty and crime riddent…the district he was the senator is still in poverty and crime ridden…
I ask again where has he ever been succesful outside of getting elected…don’t worry i’ll wait.

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Funny, I watched the interview anf felt that he was gracious and ready to go. Did anyone else watch the interview or are you all reacting to a bias headline?
Please educate yourselves.

Posted by: MIKE | October 2, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Tina: Why should Obama complain. She is black that’s what makes the difference. And Obama is half black. Underneath she could be bias and they could have picked her to trick Palin because they don’t want her on the ticket. Anothing subject is Couric who was fired from CNN years ago because of her voice. Did not do well on the Today Show, went to CBS and her job is under consideration right now because her ratings are failing. She is not well liked.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 2, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

how about a piece of legislation that he has authored that has improved the lives of anybody or even affected the lives of anybody
Bills that he has sponsored don’t even make it for a vote…how can he lead the two houses of congress if he cant even sponsor one piece of legislation and get it even voted on.

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Quick! Let’s all talk about something other than Palin’s total lack of qualifications! Quick! Before someone notices!

Posted by: zorg | October 2, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

how is the “liberal media elite” making Sarah Palin incapable of answering questions that a VP should be able to?

Posted by: 56 year old "WHITE" female | October 2, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Let me get this straight – When it comes to Gov. Palin and Troopergate, we are supposed to trust that she was professional enough not to conflate her sister’s personal situation with her hiring/firing powers as Governor.
BUT… Wouldn’t the same assumption of professionalism extend to Ifill? McCain’s words imply the campaign does not truly believe she is professional enough to avoid conflating her journalistic integrity/objectivity with the non-fiction book she is writing.
Double standard.

Posted by: imamomlee | October 2, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

I do not understand when someone says that they supported Hillary, but, will now vote for Obama. That makes very little sense, since Obama and Clinton have very similiar beliefes on things and McCain is a 180 from Clinton. The actuall thinking process behind that is skewed.

Posted by: Francheska | October 2, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

The blame game has gone on too long and no one is buying it anymore. McCain approved the moderators months ago. All have written books, they are writers, after all! When the blame game starts before the debate, you can practically smell the flop sweat. “We know we’re gonna lose, so we better figure out who to blame.”

Posted by: obamamama | October 2, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

I do not understand when someone says that they supported Hillary, but, will NOT vote for Obama. That makes very little sense, since Obama and Clinton have very similiar beliefes on things and McCain is a 180 from Clinton. The actuall thinking process behind that is skewed.

Posted by: Francheska | October 2, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

tatek: I am so glad you asked that. The former mayor of NY stated that Obama has never ran anything in his life. Obama wanted to be president when he was a student at Harvard. He read many books on MLK that his mother gave him and he wants to make the same history. And he is desperate to do it. What he says in his copied speech and what he is really going to do are two different things. He ran for the senate seat playing dirty pool to a woman that was going to run again named Alice J. Palmer. He claimed she had forges signatures and won. That’s how Alan Keyes became involved and ran against Obama. He is nothing but an underhanded crook. That woman never ran for office again. This was shown on television months ago. And Alan Keyes is not a fan of Obama’s. He is not an honest politician. That’s what happens when you associate with crooks. You become one.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 2, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

“The republican party is the only party that can fix the system that its party broke”… that’s the best quote I’ve heard.
every ones real opinion will not be talked about pertaining to Palin I can blog all day long and try to have a voice like yesterday…90% of the blogs on CNN said they did not like anything that was said at GOP including Palins speech but I guess the media owes her one?
How come this isn’t news? How come the news didn’t report what people really thought of all the speeches? That they weren’t well received at all but you took all the blogs off from your site…I guess you owe her a few free bees to keep her in the media…every one knows it was a good speech “in that hall” and that’s it.
Not one speech I heard from the GOP spoke to the America I know and the news media knows it. Can someone tell me who decides what news should be reported? I’d love to give my opinion and it be talked about Why don’t you talk about this poll on larry king
Quick Vote
Will you vote for John McCain?
Yes 19% 1025
No 81% 4250
Total Votes: 5275
This is not a scientific poll

Posted by: gop now 4 dnc | October 2, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

the silence is deafening..no one can think of anything he was the president, ceo of or general manager of. Managing editor of the harvard law review doesn’t count.
people just remember if he elected he will face executive decisions that he has never ever faced at any level. That’s like taking a kid who played high school football for three years, scored zero touchdowns, came off the bench, looks good in his uniform and then ask him to be the quarterback for Pittsburgh Steelers. Actually that’s not fair the kid would more relevant experience.

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Tina: Why should Obama complain. She is black that’s what makes the difference. And Obama is half black. Underneath she could be bias and they could have picked her to trick Palin because they don’t want her on the ticket.
——
Well, let’s see, Marianne. Maybe they picked her because she is a respected journalist and moderated the last presidential debate in a trustworthy manner. Wait, that’s logical. I’ll use your logic. Maybe they picked her because she is a woman and underneath, she might be biased toward Palin.
I’m one Dem who wants Palin on the ticket. Takes the close race away and gives Dems a clear advantage.

Posted by: obamamama | October 2, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

It was to be expected. McCain has been crying foul on the media ever since Palin hasnt proven to be the wise choice as running mate…she is simply not qulaified for the psoition. And now he wants to intimate Ifill on the night of the debate. In other words, if she doesnt perform as expected it will be Ifill’s fault for asking ‘tough’ questions expected to be asked of anyone running for that position. Ifill is too professional to allow herself to be intimitaded.

Posted by: Dee | October 2, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

fill will do a fine job. She is a pro. However, no matter how poorly Palin expresses herself her core supporters will blame Ifil. The key argument from many claiming to be “Middle America” is as follows: Palin is as uninformed as we are that”s why we like her and want her to run the country. These extreme social conservatives are not the real Middle America that works like the dickens to make a living. They want someone who knows what they are doing to run the nation. They want to support a candidate who will make sure there will be something left for their kids. That is why, after hearing what Palin has to say, working women are running away in droves from McCain/Palin. How dare these smug, mindless Palin supporters claim to speak for Middle America.

Posted by: jefflz | October 2, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Take a good look at what Obama did in Chicago and Illinois. Not much at all the schools are still one of the worst in the land. Cook county sale tax are the highest in the U.S. he is mixed up in a real state scandal with Tony Rezko he received big campane contribution dirty money only gave it back when the press got a hold of it and Tony Rezko was convicted. One thing in the debate I believe he said he stood up against the Iraq war and said no He was not in Washington 6 years ago he was in Springfield, IL so what’s up with that statement?

Posted by: Ask the Chief | October 2, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

compare resumes between palin and obama..objectively. line them up with the duties of the president. I dare you.
President
Leader of Armed forces
Veto power
Leader of civil defense
In charge of Criminal Justice system
responsible for balancing the budget
Responsible for filling and supervising government roles (judges, police, budget, Environmental,etc)
Foreign pOlicy

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Tim Donaghy was a very professional and experienced NBA ref for many years, but now he’s in jail for betting on games. Pete Rose will never be in the hall of fame because of his conflict of interest.
Gwen Ifill has also been a professional journalist for years, but now, like the others, she has made a bet on the presidential race. You can’t say she has no horse in this race because she absolutely does. She has a major financial stake in who wins, no different than making a bet.
Whether the McCain camp has used this strategically or not, it’s an outside issue that can affect how this debate is managed and perceived. Too late now, but she should have disclosed this to both sides, offered to step down weeks ago, and let it be decided by the parties. They would have no excuse.

Posted by: Present | October 2, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Yeah, life’s not fair. Ask McCain’s first wife Carol about that one.
Poor John. He was the son of an Admiral and married a $700 million trophy wife.
Life just sucks, huh, John?

Posted by: Kevin | October 2, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

i love it…none of you obama supporters can respond. just admit it you are voting for him because you don’t have jobs and you want the government(me) to feed, cloth, bathe and bury you. Cradel to grave.

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Get rid of her and get another comentator. The book is a problem.

Posted by: hector | October 2, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

By the way..not that it should matter…but i’m a black man…born and raised in detroit…staight ghetto…and game recognizes game..

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

obama is all form and no substance

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Can the McShame camp complain any louder or cry any more? I am sick of the distractions, the high drama and the games they are playing. It’s time for mature leadership and by mature I dont mean age, but stability and accountability. it’s time for Obama. NO MORE DRAMA VOTE FOR OBAMA!

Posted by: roberincharlotte | October 2, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Mariann: You are implying Obama is a Crook. Does that also mean you believe John McCain is somehow above it all? For example, look at McCain’s top strategist, Charlie Black – a multi-millionaire Lobbyist with clients like Blackwater, Lockheed, Philip Morris, AT & T. Black has also been a hired gun for repressive regimes in Angola, Somalia, and Zaire. Great guy. And, you may not remember, but Charlie Black was the Washington buddy for Ahmed Chalabi, the Iraqi con-man who worked with Cheney and Rumsfeld to drum up false info that led to this TRILLION dollar war in Iraq. Shall we go on with McCain’s long time friend and economic advisor Phil ‘ENRON’ Gramm?

Posted by: Center One | October 2, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Mariann Pepitone Maybe he should have a dream to but don’t involve us because he is having a nightmare and we want no part of it. You go home now Obama!!!!

Posted by: Iserv4JC | October 2, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

i love it…you obama cannot touch my arguments..Tatek 1000…obama supporters zero

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

maybe rush limbaugh should moderate the next presidential debate

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Obama supporter: “Gee… I don’t know what I would do if ABC news didn’t do my thinking for me.”

Posted by: rkej08 | October 2, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Tatek: being a manager or c.e.o. of something doesnt make you any more qualified for POTUS. Would we want the c.e.o. of Lehman Brothers, Wachovia, Fannie Mae or Freddy Mac as president? I doubt it. What matters is a fundamentally different approach to the highest office in the land. One where reason and intellect are valued and impulsivity and high drama are shuned. Obama has the character, legal background, intelligence, Senatorial experience and leadership qualities we need to get us back on track again. By the way I have a good job and dont need a hand out. I am voting for Obama because he is by far the better man and the better candidate for the position. NO MORE DRAMA VOTE FOR OBAMA!

Posted by: roberincharlotte | October 2, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

DON’T DENY THE HURT THE RIGHT TO VOTE
To every American in this United States, I am not commenting as a Democrat or a Republican, but a concerned and confused citizen. In Michigan, there are people who have lost their homes and I read an article that the Republicans are trying to deny the people the right to vote because they do not have a valid address. In California, people lost homes to fire, In Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, people have lost homes to flood. CALL YOUR CONGRESS AND SENATE TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE.
HOW LOW CAN THEY GO, WHILE PEOPLE ARE LOSING JOBS IN RECORD NUMBERS AND LOSING HOMES TO FORECLOSURES, AND BURNED OUT AND FLOODED OUT, THAT ANYONE WOULD DENY THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE.
When America is down, we try and help one another, not step on one another. Do not allow anyone to take away your right to vote or tell you your vote will not count. Not in Michigan, California, Florida, Texas, Louisiana or any other state. I hope some Republicans are not stooping that low to try and help McCain. You will end up in a fight with both Republicans and Democrats!!!!! We may not all be from the same party, but we are from the same country!!!! Verify your rights. If they deny your rights, Americans will stand with you to FIGHT.

Posted by: Woman For Change | October 2, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

TateK, frankly no one cares what an insipid idiot like you says.
So, you have no replies.
However, if you go to your local hospital, they have the meds you need.
Have a nice day.

Posted by: CHUCK | October 2, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Gwenn Ifill is a professional. It’s Sarah Palin’s professionalism that is the question.

Posted by: plantain11 | October 2, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Ask the Cheif wrote:
“Take a good look at what Obama did in Chicago and Illinois. Not much at all the schools are still one of the worst in the land. Cook county sale tax are the highest in the U.S…..”
—————————————-
Can you please go do a little research before you type such GARBAGE. Did you do research on Alaska and Arizona and Delaware schools?
OMG, can you for at least one moment in your lifetime think outside of the box, or at least do your own research and stop relying on right-wing talking points.
Please provide some actual facts.
This is soooo SAD.
Everyone, please, please, do your own research. The internet is a good tool for doing this.
We have to get it right this time.
United we stand, divided we fall.

Posted by: Kenneth from Minneapolis | October 2, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

tax refunds to all alaskans during her term…
gas tax refunds to all alaskans
rejected her own party hacks
vetoed unnecessary spending
this aint american idol for speaking performances…it’s a job interview and that is based on experience and…pay attention obama supporters …A-CCOM-PLISH-MENTS !!!!!!!!

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Ifill and PBS are now a disgrace: she finds it “curious” that someone questions her as a moderator? Can she read “perception of bias?” How about “actual bias?”
She admits she didn’t tell the Comission about the book. Why? Can anyone imagine selecting someone to moderate who authored “The Age of McCain” for the debates?
She should have disclosed and have the sense and grace–ok, professionalism– to recuse herself.
But she’s now wondering aloud “how can it be that anyone would question my impartiality?” as if no one could. What a joke! I’d question anyone’s ability to moderate a debate where they’d written a book so titled.
You posters that insist this is all on big distraction on the way to the hanging are disgraceful. The perception that this debate has been tainted will remain for decades. It was grossly unprofessional of PBS to do this.

Posted by: Drebin | October 2, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Say “yes” to McCain!
Say “NO” to Hussein and crack.

Posted by: zadie | October 2, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Gwen Ifill is a Gorilla and so is Obamammas wife.

Posted by: Tanisha | October 2, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Time to leave this post. The Mccain supporters are scary. Dont want to debate the facts, but sling mud and make high drama. NO MORE DRAMA VOTE FOR OBAMA!

Posted by: roberincharlotte | October 2, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

TateK. You are mistaken to say Obama supporters are expecting cradle to grave: we want our country to get back to work. I am a small business owner who want a government focused on creating jobs and re-building America. Many of us want a complete break from 8 years failed Republican Supply Side economics and a return to policies which have been ignored or trampled during the Bush era. We believe in fair progressive taxation, with proceeds spent on programs which lift up the poor and disadvantaged, such as education, job training, rehabilitation, health care, social security and welfare. That does not mean Socialism – it means redirecting our wealth and efforts. Obama supporters believe this strengthens our society from the poor and Middle Class up, and better prepares all children to compete in an aggressive 21st century global economy. We believe in oversight and regulation of business and industry, to protect Americans from the abuse, cheating, and exploitation that arise any time corporations are allowed to operate unchecked. (This may ring a bell.) We also support protection of American jobs and salaries, including support for unions and measures to discourage outsourcing. And, as an Obama supporter, I believe in freedom from discrimination based on sex, sexual preference, or religion. Lately, Democrats also have become the party of resistance to the far-right Christians’ attempt to theocratize our country.

Posted by: Idahogirl | October 2, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

DON’T DENY THE HURT THE RIGHT TO VOTE
To every American in this United States, I am not commenting as a Democrat or a Republican, but a concerned and confused citizen. In Michigan, there are people who have lost their homes and I read an article that the Republicans are trying to deny the people the right to vote because they do not have a valid address. In California, people lost homes to fire, In Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, people have lost homes to flood. CALL YOUR CONGRESS AND SENATE TO MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE.
HOW LOW CAN THEY GO, WHILE PEOPLE ARE LOSING JOBS IN RECORD NUMBERS AND LOSING HOMES TO FORECLOSURES, AND BURNED OUT AND FLOODED OUT, THAT ANYONE WOULD DENY THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE.
When America is down, we try and help one another, not step on one another. Do not allow anyone to take away your right to vote or tell you your vote will not count. Not in Michigan, California, Florida, Texas, Louisiana or any other state. I hope some Republicans are not stooping that low to try and help McCain. You will end up in a fight with both Republicans and Democrats!!!!! We may not all be from the same party, but we are from the same country!!!! Verify your rights. If they deny your rights, Americans will stand with you to FIGHT.

Posted by: Woman For Change | October 2, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

TateK wrote:
“tax refunds to all alaskans during her term…
gas tax refunds to all alaskans
rejected her own party hacks
vetoed unnecessary spending”
———————————-
I got a $1200 check from Bush in May 2008. This make him a great leader!
What you failed to mention about Palin is that she raised taxes in other areas (do your own research to find out which).
She increased spending in the administrative branch of Alaska State government. I bet you did not know that. The reason you do not know this is because you rely on right-wing talkig points instead of doing your own research.
It’s a shame, and I will not make fun of McCain by calling him McShame.
United We Stand, Divided We Fall.

Posted by: Kenneth of Minneapolis | October 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

McCain is such a sad pitiful LIAR.
He lied and said he suspended his campaign for the bailout, only he did not suspend it. He said he may not do the debate, yet he took an article out in the Wall Street Journal saying he won the debate, PROBLEM IS THE DEBATE DID NOT HAPPEN YET. He looked stupid.
MCCAIN’S FRIENDS THOUGHT THE BAILOUT WOULD PASS, AND GAVE MCCAIN CREDIT FOR IT. MCCAIN ALSO GAVE HIMSELF CREDIT FOR IT. HE SAID HE WENT TO CAPITOL HILL, ONLY HE DIDN’T. HE SAID OBAMA USED THE PHONE, ONLY HE DID ALSO.

Posted by: Woman for Truth | October 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

THE BILL FAILED BECAUSE 133 REPUBLICANS SAID NO, AND MCCAIN AND HIS FRIENDS LOOK LIKE IDIOTS, AND MCCAIN’s REPSONSE IS TO, WHAT ELSE, BLAME OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS, GO FIGURE??? 26 YEARS OF DEREGULATIONS. SEX PARTIES WITH OIL COMPANIES AND THE FINANCIAL MARKET TETTERING ON FAILURE, MCCAIN NOT EVEN REALIZING THE FUNDAMENTALS OF OUR ECONOMY ARE NOT SOUND. TAKING AWAY RULES WILL RESULT IN DISASTER, AND WHAT DOES MCCAIN AND HIS CAMPAIGN DO?? BLAME OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS.
MCCAIN NEEDS TO THINK BACK TO THE EIGHTTIES AND KEATING 5 WHEN THEY DEREGED THE SAVINGS AND LOANS AFTER BEING PAID OFF. HE DIDN’T REALIZE WHAT WAS GOING ON THEN EITHER. THE FUNDAMENTALS OF THE SAVINGS AND LOAN WERE FINE TO MCCAIN BACK THEN.
SAD, PITIFUL, ANGRY MCCAIN !!!!

Posted by: Woman for Truth | October 2, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

THE TRUTH IS THIS DISASTER DID HAPPEN ON BUSH’S WATCH. THE SEX PARTIES WITH OIL COMPANIES, LIES ABOUT THE WAR, FIRING PEOPLE ILLEGALLY, BEING BIAS WHEN HIRING PEOPLE,
KATRINA AND NOW TEXAS AND MANY STATES ARE OUT OF GAS, THE REPUBLICANS TRYING TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OTHERS TRAGEDIES BY TRYING TO GET THEIR VOTE NOT COUNTED BECAUSE THEIR HOUSE EITHER WASHED AWAY IN A STORM, BURNED OUT FROM A FIRE, GOT FORECLOSED ON AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO NOT ALLOW THESE ALREADY SUFFERING PEOPLES VOTES NOT TO COUNT AND YOU ARE ANGRY BECAUSE PELOSI HURT YOUR FEELINGS AND THE MARKET LOST A TRILLION DOLLARS. THE REPUBLICANS NEED TO SUCK IT UP AND GROW UP AND FACE THE FACT THAT IT DID HAPPEN ON THEIR WATCH, BUT BE DILIGENT ABOUT RESOLVING IT. BE ACCOOUNTABLE, THEN BE THE CONCERNED ONES AND WORK OUT A RESOLUTION.
PLEASE, HOWEVER, DO NOT TRY AND TAKE VOTES AWAY FROM MICHIGAN OR ANY OTHER STATE. DO NOT MAKE YOURSELVES LOOK LIKE THE LOWEST PIECE OF SLIM BY TAKING ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE WHILE THEY ARE DOWN. I’M SPEAKING FOR ALL CULTURES, ALL AGES, ALL AMERICANS. IF YOU BEAT US(AMERICANS) WHEN WE ARE DOWN, THAT WILL BE YOUR QUICKEST WAY OUT. CHECK ADDRESSES IF YOU WILL, BUT WE WILL FIND OUT AND YOU WILL BE OUT.
IF THIS WAS A COMEDY, IT STILL WOULD NOT BE FUNNY. THE CONGRESS DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS NEED TO GET IT TOGETHER.

Posted by: American for Change | October 2, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

ifills book was known about before she was selected as a moderator
both campaigns must agree on the moderator of any debate
so you have two choices in how you can react to this logically
1. john mccains campaign is inept and cant bother to do the most basic of research
or
2. mccain camp didnt find this threatening at all, and in fact they saw an opportunity to at a later date use this in case something went wrong
which number 2 seems the most likely to me
if its number 1 then… thats just scary and they should listen to their campaign slogan and bow out of the race and put their country first
we dont need a hot head in the white house, or someone who is just going to gamble with our safety.
we dont need another george bush who just looks into the eyes of other nations and gets a feeling about them and thats it
we need someone who can communicate and get stuff done in a reasonable way

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 2, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Give me a break–
If the shoe was on the other foot-all the Obama robots would have a fit.
OK, put Ifill in–but next debate, let’s put in Bill O’Reilly to be the moderator.
In fact, Bill O’Reilly would make a great moderator. He doesn’t take crap from either candidate.
Wonder how that would go over with Obama and his ilk.

Posted by: NielPA | October 2, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

woman for change..nice response..you think that up all by yourself…i’ll respond in kind…’I know you are but what am I’ geez just what one would expect

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

what a joke, impartial, mayber for the MSM, help stop this crap, visit, http://www.sarahpalinhasaposse.com

Posted by: obvious guy | October 2, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

obvious guy types fast at work, http://www.sarahpalinhasaposse.com

Posted by: obvious guy | October 2, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

rkej08..tell you what..if you ever have the opportunity to hire someone let me know. I’ll send you someone who has fresh approach, reason and intellect no impulsivity and who shuns high drama. I’ll make sure they have had some exposure to the job but they have no significant achievments to show for it. just a resume of failed attempts to make a change.

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

A book “favorable to Obama”?? Has McCain READ the book? If he hasn’t read it, then he doesn’t KNOW if it’s favorable or not, does he? What a freakin’ jerk.
Personally, I’m ashamed that I once thought this man had ANY integrity at all. EVER. Yeah, John McCain was a POW. Well, at what point does his heroism cease to matter? His behavior TODAY would suggest his heroism in Vietnam was “beginner’s luck,” a one-time thing. Today, no integrity or honor whatsoever. Period.

Posted by: TrueBlue | October 2, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Gwen is now under pressure to be neutral and professional….

Posted by: joelene | October 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Gwen has never been anything but professional. The McCain camp wouldn’t know that, however; they wouldn’t know professionalism if it jumped up and bit his comb-over.

Posted by: TrueBlue | October 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

The facts are as follows: Ifill is one of the best known political reporters in the US; she has made no secret that she is writing the book and has given interviews about it; the McCain campaign has known about both the book and the fact that she was to moderate the debate for a month and have said nothing until it was too late to replace her.
That begs the question of why and I think the answer is pretty clear. They want Ifill to moderate, because they are pretty sure she will be fair and may even bend over backwards to show that she is unbiased (thus actually giving Palin an advantage). So, letting her go on, while criticizing her in advance will make a certain portion of the audience as or more attentive to looking for moderator bias, than looking at the answers.
As importantly, no matter what Ifill does, you can bet that, unless Palin hits one out of the park, the McCain campaign will be out in force after the debate, claiming that it wasn’t a fair debate. In other words, it is yet another transparently political tactic to try to protect Palin from objective scrutiny. Can’t blame them for trying, as this tactic worked for Bush in two elections, where he would talk like a maroon yet be declared the “winner” (for exceeding the public’s extremely low expectations of him.

Posted by: S Mc | October 2, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Give me a break–
If the shoe was on the other foot-all the Obama robots would have a fit
THEY ALREADY HAD A FIT when CLinton cleaned Obama’s clock in the PA. debate. They blamed it on ABC moderators.

Posted by: geevill | October 2, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Kenneth from Minneapolis Fact we pay 10.5 % sale taxes every time we go to the store. Fact we are talking what he die for Ill His kids go to one of the most upper privet school there is. Go and read Chicago’s newspapers back over the last 2 years. Fact he complains about the numbers of out troops that have died in Iraq lets count the numbers on babies that have been killed in ILL because on his legislation But you liberals don’t give a dam about then as long as you can party and have a good old time and not be reasonable Let us be gay ale us have our abortions let us smoke dope Next you all will be justifying Bestiality and pedophiles. So where dose it stop?

Posted by: Ask the Chief | October 2, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Paul:
You took the words out of my mouth. Great advise!

Posted by: Kiara | October 2, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

MCain cry me a river or better yet go jump off that bridge to NO WHERE!

Posted by: GL | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Ask the Chief
You expect the government to legislate morality? I believe women have rights to privacy especially her own body and individual rights in general.
I expect government to stay out of my personal business.
I do not expect government to make fodder out of our young men and women serving in the armed forces.
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

Posted by: Kenneth from Minneapolis | October 2, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

roberincharlotte…i’m not mistaken…I am evidence that a poor black child from inner city detroit can end up working for some of the best fortune 100 companies, travel the world, own his home, and raise a family all without gub’ment help. My mother refused to take welfare…she instead worked two to three jobs to support me, my brother, and often her drug addicted sisters kids. When my friends in the neighborhood decided to skip school..i didn’t..when my friends decided to not do their homework i didn’t. When my friends decided to have pre-marital unprotected sex I didn’t. Bottom line my mother made different choices. I made different choices. Colin Powel made different choicess..NOT Excuses.
People need to step up and take responsiblity for themselves. you go and go and take a 3 yr ARM interest only mortgage. Well when the rate adjust dont’ go and say you were fooled and didn’t know any better. Say I learned a valuable lesson, man up and take care of your business.
I don’t consider it socially responsible to take money that I sweated to earn and just make me give it to a program that will be run by the government. which by the way will waste 80 cents of every dollar they take.
I believe charity begins at home and I practice that. I give more money away than the government could ever force me to give. You start taking away people’s opportunity to be charitable and watch poor people suffer more.
I’m done with you people. Say no to the Drama..so No to Obama..

Posted by: TateK | October 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Trueblue, question? Is abc, nbc, msnbc, cnn, and fox professional journalism? How do you look at these stations and their reporting and reporters?

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

McCain is such a pathetic crybaby. It will be a pleasure when he loses this election and this man of the people can retire to whichever of his eleven luxury homes he likes the best.

Posted by: Pluto Animus | October 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

i love it…none of you obama supporters can respond. just admit it you are voting for him because you don’t have jobs and you want the government(me) to feed, cloth, bathe and bury you. Cradel to grave.( Add on no they are voting for him becouse their unions are telling them to vote for him!!!!

Posted by: Iserv4JC | October 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

TrueBlue – Actually, the McCain campaign knows that Gwen Ifill is a professional. That’s what scares them. They want to discredit her based on a book that she’s writing…that they knew about. They are worried that if Gov. Palin performs as badly as her interviews, they will have little chance for recovery. They’ve seen Sarah in action and I don’t think they really like what they’ve seen. But, they can’t openly admit a mistake in the midst of a campaign. They’re trying to fool the public with a diversion.

Posted by: 63tango | October 2, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Gewn Ifill is nothing but a racist affirmative action baby, with absolutely ZERO talent. John McCain has every right to be pissed off. Its not enough that the liberal elite media are smearing him and Palin daily, while cleaning Obamas dirty diaper everyday. The fact that she is pro-black and writing a book about Obama makes her ineligable. What part of that dont you peole get?

Posted by: Badger | October 2, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

More jobs and companies went over seas during the Clinton Administration than Regan, Bush Sr. and Bush combined! But the liberal’s never complain about that, because they got their government hand out programs from Clinton,!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Did somebody say gwen Ifill is a professional???? Holy shttt!! Can I stop laughing? A professional would have said, sorry, but I can not be a fair and balanced moderator while I am pro-black, pro Obama, and in the midst of writing a book that would benefit me finnancially should Obama win.

Posted by: Badger | October 2, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Gwen is a very good choice for moderator so stop your complaining John McCain. You approved her as the moderator without checking her profile and now you want to be mad. I hate to talk down to an old man but you are extremely incompetent in your decision making.

Posted by: Sense | October 2, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Id rather have all the moderators come from PBS then anywhere else. Corporate news outlets always have an agenda, all of them.

Posted by: Sense | October 2, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Did anyone notice that McShame just voted for a bill that has $195 billion in pork spending yesterday? Isn’t he the one who said that he would stop this practice?
So much for principles, and the lies keep rolling along!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 2, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

McCain always reminded people “I was a POW”, “I was a POW”. That’s all he got for building his political career. I am tired of hearing it all the time. We need a stable and intelligent leader at this critical moment of our country, not just a POW.

Posted by: leighg1 | October 2, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Senator McCain is not complaining, he was asked a question and he answered it. You liberal idiots act like you’re a bunch psychiatrist know it all’s. If the shoe was on the other foot, how do you think Obama and you leftist would react, the same, but worse! There is nothing wrong in bringing the factor of partiality being a possible outcome. What, people can’t talk about the what if’s when it’s the Republicans asking questions, but you libs can say whatever whenever you want. You liberal moron’s are the little cry babies, because when you don’t get your way, you protest, show your anger, and act like people don’t understand you. Well, stop acting like cry baby morons and idiots and people will listen to you nuts, maybe.

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Obama is Jim Jones reincarnated and on November 4th, a majority of the U.S. population will drink the “Kool-Aid”. I don’t recall anything more cult-like in my life.

Posted by: Anon | October 2, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Sure, McCane should have known about the book before he agreed to Ifill as the moderator, after all, a simple Google search would have given him all the info he would have needed to decide if the moderator may/may not be biased. Then again, maybe not, as grampa simpson (aka McCane) has admitted he does not know how to use the internets (or much else for that matter). Guess we’ll get to hear more excuses about the “gotcha” jouralism that is the excuse for Caribou Barbie’s (Palin) inability to answer questions in complete and coherent sentences.

Posted by: SLC_Raider | October 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Why does Grumpy-Pa have to protect little Sarah? she is running for the second highest job in America, if she can not handle the reporters or the job then maybe he should have thought that out before picking her for the ticket. This is going to be fun, I did see the interview with Grumpy-Pa and Sarah, he would answer questions asked of her. And then you have the Gotcha questions from a voter, that they now have spun to the media.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | October 2, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Independent R, you’re a moron! You evidently don’t pay attention to all aspects of news and different channels, which shows your own liberal bias. He passed it to help the economy, and he said he was against a lot of it but the economy needed it now, and he didn’t have any pork himself. Obama voting for it, so what’s your point. Most of the worthless pork was from the Democrats to organizations like Acorn, which now are not getting crap, and the Republicans extended tax break incentives to companies to keep payrolls going. So who cares about who now!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Again, the MCcain camp did not do their homework. Why are they complaining in the last hour. Sad, just like their vetting process for VP. A day late, and a dollar short. Personally I think they feel because MS. Ifill is African American, she’ll work extra hard to make sure Palin slips up. Oh wait, they forget Gwenn is also a woman, maybe she’ll give Palin a break…MCcain, engage brain before you shift your mouth

Posted by: Bill Tampa Fl | October 2, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

MCCain just found out she was the commentator? Come on…
He most likely wants to put off the debate as he wanted to put off his with Obama.
Palin was to play with the big boys she should be afraid of questions. Why should Biden be so careful with her? Ridiculous.
Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: Barbara | October 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

1929 anyone?

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Stay tuned at 9 tonight folks: It’s the next hilarious episode of Babbling Barbie. The fact that anyone can take her seriously for even a minute after she opens her mouth demonstrates a cult following beyond anything else. -And you can spare us the ridiculous ‘county first’ baloney. This chick is a voter publicity stunt and nothing else.

Posted by: Loki | October 2, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

EVERYBODY is biased.
Most people dont cop to it.
Get off it.
WHITE RACISTS masquerading as FOX commentators have been spinning Obama for two years.
One night, we get a black person to ask the questions and OH NO! the white guys heads are spinning off lest someone ask Mrs Pitbull a couple of challenging questions.
What can the moderator do, after all?
Anything that Chris Stephanopous and ABC did to Obama?
Think that was fair?

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 2, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Badger – I see your posts becoming shriller and more disgusting as McCain slips in the polls. Fine, disagree with Ifill as moderator, but please spare us your dirty diapers comments. Ifill is most certainly not a “racist with ZERO talent”. The late Tim Russert portrayed her as “a wonderful, classy lady and a great journalist.” Did you watch the 2004 VP debates with Ifill as moderator? If not, you have no frame of reference except the howling of right wing radio, so stop parroting it here. Ifill asked both candidates tough questions. Senator McCain has known for some time Ifill would be moderating and that she had written a book. Stop grasping for excuses to blame the media for Palin’s recent interview disasters.

Posted by: Center One | October 2, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Wrong again, Obama followers are the cult, because cult’s show anger toward’s people and judge in hatred for their leaders cause, that is also a fact in the Obama camp!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

McCain needs to worry about fixing this economic mess he and Bush helped to create(voted with the president 90% of the time). Palin is a big girl she doesn’t need Papa Mccain , if she does she needs to resign.

Posted by: lowes4321 | October 2, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Obama voted 87% of the time with President Bush also moron!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Obama voted with Bush on tax breaks for big oil companies, and McCain voted no on the tax breaks to the big oil co.

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Maybe lets pick someone objective, like Sean Hannity…or Todd Palin!!

Posted by: marc | October 2, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

The fear that McCainites have for Ifill’s alledged bias comes directly from the extremist right-wing bias in their own brains. Because they think Fox “journalism” is “normal” they can’t imagine anyone other than Sean Hannity or Pat Robertson being fair to them.

Posted by: AlChemist | October 2, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Harold D–Obama voted 87% of the time with President Bush also moron! If you
re going to lie then you need to NOT comment! He agreed with Bush 41% of the time not 87% idiot!

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

I didn’t know that pitbulls whine and cry….learn something new every day…unless, of course, you’re Sarah Palin!! Knowledge is dangerous!!!

Posted by: marc | October 2, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

The bottom line is, McSame and Bumbling Barbie have no chance in hell of winning this election. And why would you want them to anyway? McSame’s siver bullet ended up being a hollow shell! How sad!

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

McCain is coming across as a whiner.

Posted by: Didi | October 2, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Bushmasterwacker, you just proved you’re an idiot on drugs you liberal nut!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

RJ2008 – The Bible says that only a man that is foolish himself will call another man a fool.
Everyone on here calling McCain or Republicans “whiners”, I implore you to allow those words to ring in your ears when in 2 years the man that you’ve placed into office is Mr. Obama and our precious Constitution has been torn apart. Please do not whine when you see cities on American soil be allowed to govern Muslims under Muslim law first and US law second. You may laugh and call me crazy now but give it time, if this man is elected then the trojan horse will be released upon our society of freedom.
Sadly, in my 18 years of voting priviledge’s this is the absolute worst set of candidates that I have ever seen placed together in one election. I bet if the Republicans knew 4 months ago about the state of our economy Mitt Romney would be the candidate of choice and Hillary would have received the Dems vote.
American Politics have reached a sad era, May God shed his Grace upon this country the next 4 years and provide the American people protection from what is to come.

Posted by: An Independent Voice | October 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Of course Ifill, instead of admitting she was wrong not to disclose her book and wrong not to recluse herself, turns instead for the racist jab. God help America if Obama and all his black power friends get any deeper into Washington.

Posted by: MBrady | October 2, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Bushmasterwacker, no comment eh? Obama agreed 41% with Bush, but the other 46% he still voted with Bush with disagreements but still voted with him instead of present, so he could put his name on the bill and receive his pork earmarks you moron!

Posted by: Harold D | October 2, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Posted by: obvious guy | October 2, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

All I have to say is that Ifill’s book is about the Black Political Movement from Civil Rights to the Present. This is not a bio on Barrack its about the dream of Dr. Martin Luther King coming alive in the 21st century. If Ifill whom is a black woman wrote a book about several white politicians would we be having this same conversation ?

Posted by: Truely a Shame | October 2, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

“And whoever the moderator is and no matter what the questions are, it doesn’t matter because Sarah Palin is great.”
***************************************
Hes going senile.

Posted by: abby | October 2, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Harold D, Did you vote for Bush?

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I’m as Pro-Obama as it gets, but I also think Gwen should step down, because it gives McSame and his side kick something else to complain about. And nothing is more annoying than a 100 year old man complaining.

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Oldest trick in the book, Phil Jackson used to do it all the time, work the refs before the game so you can get the favorable calls.
This would’ve been news if the damm book hadn’t been anounced many months ago, way before they had a date for the debate, why didn’t they objected about it but 2 days before the debate?
I tell you why, because mcshame and the repukes are just working the press now so they can have an excuse in case the dumb bimbo trips and fails at the debate, ifill has more integrity in her in her pinkie than mcshame and the bimbo combined, its as simple as that, which i guess makes it official that there’s no low now that mcshame wouldn’t sink to.

Posted by: countryfirst | October 2, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The Presidential Debate Commission has to work ONCE every four years and they come up with Gwen (read my Obamabook). Apparently Whoopie Goldberg couldn’t find time away from slapping blondie around on the View and they didn’t have the budget for Michal Moore’s buffet demands. Who are these idiots and who pays them for this brilliant work?

Posted by: DocAthens | October 2, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Harold D– I asked you a question. maybe you didnt hear me the first time so i’ll ask it again. “did you vote for Bush”

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

An Independent Voice Well stated!!!! It’s not the color of his skin it’s the man himself if you want a black man we could get behind get Colin Powell! He is intelligent, has the balls to stand up and say what right and is not a shamed of the country he served He really say he got shot at.

Posted by: Ask the Chief | October 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Somebody please go find Harold D, since he called me an idiot on drugs liberal nut and a moron. I would like him to answer my question.. Dont be a coward, my friend!

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Ifill should withdraw from the debate and let some one who is really independent moderate the debate. If the moderator were a McCain supporter, the liberal media will jump all over the place in anger.

Posted by: Hector P. Luat | October 2, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Hector P. Luat — If soooo hard to find an intelligent McCain supportor to moderate this debate, so what are you gonna do??

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Harold D- Thats what I thought, you are a coward. You like to throw rocks and run!! You can admit it, you voted for Bush! And that why i didnt comment to your nonsense. In the words of Obama to McCain, “while youre over there spewing nonsense, you need to get your facts straight”

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | October 2, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Yes, the McCain camp should have caught this weeks or months ago. Sloppy on their part, but the real problem is that Ifill never disclosed her ‘Age of Obama’ Book To the Presidential Debate Commission.
Now that it’s an issue, GOP intimidation strategy or not, her credibility has been compromised. It’s a no win for the debate. If she’s too soft. . . .it’s because she’s trying too hard to prove she’s unbiased. . . if she’s too tough. . it’s because she has a large financial stake in Obama winning. If this had been disclosed to the commission, the GOP would have had ample time to reject her as moderator and we wouldn’t be talking about this.
She knew revealing this would most likely kill her debate gig. She’s just playing dumb acting like no one should care that she can moderate/referee a debate while writing a book praising Obama. Releasing it on I-day is the icing on the cake.
Maybe this is the reason they don’t let me umpire my son’s little league games?

Posted by: Present | October 2, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Of course McShame is now having problems with Ms. Ifill. She has only shown herself to be an unbiased journalist. The book was announced long before she was selected as a moderator, but as long as McShame was tied with Mr. Obama, that was not a problem. Shame on you, Mr. McCain, shame on you for acting like a spoiled kid who’s team is losing the game…Oh, you are losing.

Posted by: NatFrankie | October 2, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Come on…doesn’t Ifill stand to gain no matter who wins the election? If Obama wins, she can finish the segment on him as a great triumph in race and politics. If he loses, she can write about the effect of race on the election. No matter what, how can a biased moderator effect how Palin answers the questions? Isn’t Biden going to be asked the same questions? I think Ifill will even be more bi-partisan because every comment she makes or question she asks will be scrutinized. Please don’t come back tomorrow and say Palin did badly because the of Ifill. Was it Couric before?

Posted by: Notasingleissuevoter | October 2, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Regarding Obama and the Illinos Senate…
1. Alice Palmer did have bad signatures on her petitions, and that is why she was successfully challenged off of the primary ballot. She probably would have lost the primary anyway, as she was totally unknown outside of her district. Alice has not disappeared, she is still very active in the community, and is a high operative in the Obama campaign.
2. Then, the Republican candidate, Jack Ryan, was tainted by allegations by his former wife (StarTrek’s Jeri Ryan) of inappropriate conduct during their marriage and subsequent divorce,and withdrew from the campaign.
3. The STOOOpid Illinois Republicans did not select the (white) runner up in the Rep primary (because they didn’t like him), instead, they imported a black carpetbagger, Alan Keyes from Baltimore. Keyes is a noted nut-job, who never even established a residency in Illinois. Needless to say, he lost big-time!

Posted by: NatFrankie | October 2, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Sorry ‘wacker. Ol’ Harold is behaving just like all the other cowardly conservatives. He says that liberals are cultists because they hate conservatives and then he went and called you all those names…
It’s hard to find anyone who will admit that they voted for Bush, and especially anyone who is perfectly eligible for military service, voted for Bush and then didn’t go volunteer to fight in Iraq. -Cowards send other people to fight for them.

Posted by: Loki | October 2, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Gwen Ifill is one of the nicest and genuine people in the media today and always a professional when it comes to journalism. Senator McCain is just using this as a ploy to get under the skin of his opponents, just call it gamesmanship.
There will be no tactical surprises in the debate tonight, Gov. Palin is going to come out with a hard charging attack, hatching away as much as she can at her opponents and obfuscate criticism (this is the V.P. role in any presidential campaign). However, Senator Biden is already Teflon coated against criticism because most, if not all voters already know of his verbose past and some voters consider that part of the Biden’s charm and honesty.
The risk for Gov. Palin, Senator Biden is very capable of getting the tables turned around on her quickly, into areas where she obviously does not have the frame of experience. Glittering generalities can go only so far to a point, then one sounds foolish.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | October 2, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

aahhh, Harold doesn’t want to talk to the poor little whiny liberal bray’s, aahhh, LOL.

Posted by: Vote for the Maverick | October 2, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Obama will bring a politburo to America!

Posted by: Vote for the Maverick | October 2, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

What a bunch of whiners. She is just a moderator. She asks the questions and watches the clock. How could she influence the outcome of the debate or any aspect of it? McCain is still mad because Oprah didnt want to interview her (palin) for obvious reasons. He must think the blacks are out to get him. I think McCaint is beginning to feel that ‘little chance in hell’ win in Nov.

Posted by: I-chiwawa | October 2, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

So what if McCain is using this. The fact is they left themselves open by using a moderator with a financial stake in one side winning. . . period. Whether or not it’s true, there will now be a legitimate complaint if Palin doesn’t perform well. It’s been compromised and never should been put in her hands.

Posted by: Present | October 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Loki is a poderous polecat scalawag with scabies, a serious affect of being a liberal hyperbole in diapers!

Posted by: Vote for the Maverick | October 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Everyone knows Gwen Ifill favors Obama. She was practically in tears when Hillary won unexpectedly the New Hampshire primary.
The Republicans knew this all along and never complained because they know they have it both ways.
First, Ifill will bend over backwards to appear fair, since the only thing she loves more than O is her own reputation as a journalist. Second, if Sarah gaffs, they can jump on Ifill as the cause.

Posted by: Madeleine | October 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Typical, scumball politics by Johnny M. You should be ashamed of yourself. Is this the best shot you got, to criticise an excellent journalist? You are naught but guano.

Posted by: LawyerTom1 | October 2, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

This makes Sarah look more like an imbecile. It’s a preemptive strike just in case she is as stupid as she has appeared in other interviews. When will the McCain stop blaming everyone for his irrational decision to choose her as his running mate. If he would have properly vetted her he wouldn’t be having “buyers remorse” now. Gwen Ifill is a journalist with integrity. I enjoy watching her on PBS and she has always displayed a sense of fairness. Other reporters should stand up against this McCain/Palin shenanigans! NO MORE! WE ARE NOT STUPID (like your running mate). Your preemptive strike will not help you! Gwen just do your job!

Posted by: omanayaj | October 2, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Election day cannot come soon enough so we will no longer be subject to McCain’s crying and making excuses.

Posted by: tiredofsameolmccain | October 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

:A disgusted democrate for McCain
Hillary 2012:
Hey Evans, news flash, she still won’t win.

Posted by: allheavens | October 2, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

oman, yes, you are stupid!

Posted by: Vote for the Maverick | October 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

McCain’s campaign gives us a window into how a McCain administration would be: full of excuses; blaming the media; crying “sexist”; twisting facts and at times outright lying; ignoring facts; impulsiveness and knee-jerk reactions; tempermental; contempt toward anyone who is different. We could go on and on and on…

Posted by: whatalousycandidate | October 2, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Will it be Ifill’s fault the way Palin fails to put together coherent sentences at tonight’s debate?

Posted by: whatajoke | October 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

If you saw her coverage of the Republican convention you would know she is anything but neutral. Her comments and disgusted looks on her face describing Palin’s acceptance speech were hard to ignore. It’s a whole new ballgame with Obama. We’ll see how much integrity she has now that she has Obamalove. Look what happened to Oprah.

Posted by: Present | October 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

McCain is nothing but a whining weakling. He approved the moderator, and he knew she was writing a book. He knows Palin is going to tank so they’re trying some pre-spin. I’m embarrassed for the republicans, if this is the best candidate you’ve got.

Posted by: cturple | October 2, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

The United States is a country controlled and ruled by her bias media
The day the US refuse to follow her media and follow their mind then she will become a free country.
The edia has been to bias against Sarah what is this nonsence????? It is indeed a shame . I tell you today if the MSM makes its news balanced Obama will fall in the pols . The American media has failed us and they are useless and just empty if you believe your Obama is so good a candidate then, let him defend himself , let him fight for himself. The NSN has disappointed us and some people have not been wise to see this bias and they keep following the media like ships . This is too ridiculous and
disappointing

Posted by: MSM is too bias, its a shame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | October 2, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

McStain-on-America would have complained even if W was the moderator.

Posted by: no more mad cows | October 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

The United States is a country controlled and ruled by her bias media
The day the US refuse to follow her media and follow their mind then she will become a free country.
The media has been too bias against Sarah, what is this nonsence????? It is indeed a shame . I tell you today if the MSM makes its news balanced Obama will fall in the polls . The American media has failed us and they are useless and just empty if you believe your Obama is so good a candidate then, let him defend himself , let him fight for himself. The MSM has disappointed us and some people have not been wise to see this bias and they keep following the media like a sheep . This is too ridiculous and
disappointing

Posted by: MSM is too bias, its a shame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | October 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

It always always the same thing. Stupid republicans claiming the media is biased when they OWN practically all of it. If there is such a thing as a biased media it is in favoring the right, and it the fault of the republicans for dismantling the fairness doctrine and promoting things like the Fox Propaganda network.

Posted by: no more mad cows | October 2, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

All of you are just plain STUPID! I really mean it. The McCain team complains, not because they did not know of Ifill’s book, but because the MAJORITY OF AMERICAN DON’T KNOW about the book. The McCain team just used the media to highten the public’s awareness of Ifill’s book. THAT’S THEIR GOAL.
In my opinion, Ifill has put herself in a very precarious position. A wise person would have turned down the moderator offer long time ago. It’s not because she is biased towards Obama. But the obvious CONFLICT OF INTEREST that will blacken her show.
Now, more people are aware of Ifill’s book. What can Ifill do? If she asks Palin tough questions, many people will say “she is biased towards Obama.” If she does not ask Palin tough questions, many other people will accuse her of “being intimidated by the McCain team”.
Either way, Ifill will lose.
A wise person does not allow himself or herself in such situation.

Posted by: ablanche08 | October 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

no more mad cows, LOL, you’re a joke and a stupid one at that. That is a perfect example of taking the truth and putting a twist on it moron, typical whiny liberal goon you are.

Posted by: no more moron idiots | October 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Why is McCorpes always complaining? Oh yes, he is looking at the polls.

Posted by: Junior111 | October 2, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

“A wise person would have turned down the Vice President offer long time ago. It’s not because she won’t be able to answer debate questions, it is because she knows she is unqualified.”
Now, more people are aware of Palin’s shallow thinking. A wise person does not allow himself or herself in such situation.

Posted by: no more mad cows | October 2, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

They should check Sarah Palin to make sure she wont be all wired up, like mitt romney when he cheated in the debates!
republicans they are something else!

Posted by: ani | October 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

no more mad cows, is that bray you’re talking, I can’t understand what you’re saying? Is It he-hew or waa waaa waa waaaaaaa.

Posted by: no more mad donkeys | October 2, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

It is hard to find more blithering idiocy than a lot of these posts.
Anyone who doesn’t think who the moderator is has not been paying any attention and knows nothing about debate. Particularly in this one, they gave Ifill unbridled discretion on what questions she asks … and if you’ve ever been in a real debate you would know that even if the moderator is reading from a list of specific mandated questions, (s)he is quite able to ask/manipulate/interrupt/”get back on track/etc./etc. in so many ways that a biased moderator can easily make one candidate look like an idiot and the other look brilliant. Unbelievably foolish to think otherwise (or, the writers hope that the readers are unbelievably foolish).
Why in the world would anyone (and many of you do) think that Ifill would want this played down or hushed up until after the debates?!? She wants as much press on this as possible … because I assure you book sales matter more to her than the debate does!
Yes it is utterly stupid to have placed Ifill in this position and long before the candidates were given the opportunity to comment the conflict of interest should have been discovered and she should have no more been a possible moderator than Ophra. That’s just crazy. For EITHER camp. It gives Palin an easy excuse if she bombs and it undercuts any “victory” that Obama might be able to claim otherwise because of the perception it was a rigged game.
About half of you or more make Palin look like Einstein! [And no, I'm certainly no Republican!]
More, much more, to say, but I have a debate to go watch. Check out what Palin looks like from an Alaskan point of view. Something the mainstream media has been trying very hard to keep from happening:
http://www.alaskanwoulds.blogspot.com/

Posted by: Backwoods | October 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

For those who think that MSN, CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC are NOT biased…pleeeez pull your head out of where the sun dont shine! The light of day is a nice thing to see!

Posted by: angus | October 2, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

McCain is pathetic! Nothing but an angry stupid old man.

Posted by: disgusted | October 3, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Doesn’t McCain look like Casper the ghost. May be he is dead.

Posted by: so what | October 3, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Harold D, amazingly, unemployment and inflation were lower during the Clinton years than in both Reagan’s and Bush Sr’s terms of office. If you don’t believe me, maybe you’ll believe economists who know more than the both of us: http://www.econreview.com/phillips/us.php

Posted by: Jane D | October 3, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

The Corrupt use Double Talk. Opposite wording.
Who wanted the SUGAR, Those who Voted agaist the RESCUE FO MIDDLE AMERICANS.
Sounds like another ‘RICK DAVIS SCAM’.
We are Power and Controls little Honey Bees.
They are dying off. Why? Mico-Grnerators.
How do the Insects SEE? Ask Power and Controls Military officials, who develope Military Equipment.
Call your house rep. and Vote NO to collecting their Honey.(money)
Vote Independant.
We are Power and Controls little Honey Bees.
They are dying off. Why?
Call your house rep. and Vote NO to collecting their Honey.(money)
Vote Independant.
Republican only except Pork.
They will blame everyone, but Rick Davis.
Remember him. McCcains Advisor, who was STILL recieveing Middle Americans Money, until last Month.
McCains Top Advisor, who was helping to raise McCains Funds.
If you Vote for Corrupt Wallstreet, Then yes, You will probably vote for McCains best fried Rick Davis, who continued to Steal the American Dream, While McCain was laughing, behind the Curtin. Rick Davis pays for Corrupt Paperwork.
Say NO to the Bailout for Rick Davis.
Say NO to the Bailout for Rick Davis.
Vote NO for McCains Pork
Vote NO for Bailing out McCcains advisor , Rick Davis.
Watch CNN and MSNBC for Truth and Justic
McCains Afgan War will cost over 4Billion more dollars from Middle America.
They are already Trying to Pass McCains Nuclear Plan.
What happened to ALTERNITIVE ENERGIES?
McCain and Rick Davis are Liers.
Say No to INVISIBLE LIGHT Robots.
Say No to Military Bee Standards
Say No to Micro-Generators
Say No To Re-Elections
If Congress can take Vacation…
Middle Americans NEED a Vacation.
Middle Americans need to Relax and let Wallstreet Fall.
Call your House Reps. and Vote NO
Good Teachers are Teaching for Free.

Posted by: remember the Honey Bee | October 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Thanks Ask the Chief!
I totally agree, if Colin Powell was on this ticket running either side Dem or Rep. He would have my vote in a heart beat.
It’s amazing reading through these posts how people will call each other names and call others racist and conservatives or stinking liberal.
Do any of you people realize when you refer to someone of a different belief than yours then you come off as looking like you have hate in your heart? You appear no better than the other person slinging mud.
This forum is just a small look at the larger problem that is evident in politics today. People want their agenda instead of what is best for America and the American public. We all need to work together to make this country strong again.
9/11 was a terrible day in our history but one great thing came out of that tragedy. Americans at least for a period realized that we are all the same, black-white-yellow-red. We came together as ONE NATION UNDER GOD for a purpose. Amazing how strong we could be if we lived like that for a life time instead of just a season.
“Together we stand, divided we fall”

Posted by: An Independent Voice | October 3, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

In all seriousness while I love to read these blogs in the morning as they fire me up at the start of my day for the hard line customer service I present from my desk at a distribution center for baby toys. I think to myself what are we all gonna do when this election is over… go back to being friends? Were we ever friends in the first place? Everyone thinks everyone else is racsist now and Kool-Aid has once again become the drink of Afro-Americans nationwide (by the way those commercials used to feature white people too, just cause a motha****er don’t like ovalteen or is to broke to buy real orange juice, I aint talkin about that Tampico s**t either, doesn’t mean Kool-Aid is favored by default). oh gotta go 5 o clocks quittin time and happy hour starts in 30 minutes…2 dollar vodka and Kool-Aids at the chocolate factory.

Posted by: Light of the Rebellion | October 3, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Well, john mcCains criticizm is just another racist comment by the mccain/palin camp. let them try to dig themselves in further, they have no place to go but down. Pathetic to be talking about McCain’s comments. The lies are enough for a lifetime.

Posted by: nativegirl | October 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.