By Lee Speigel

Oct 31, 2008 7:31pm

Member of Senate GOP Leadership: Palin Isn’t Experienced Enough to be President

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., the chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, sat for an interview on Nevada One’s “NewsONE at 9."

Reporter Jeff Gillan asked Ensign about the fact that "if you look at the polling, the people who are voting against John McCain say the primary reason they’re voting against him is because of Sarah Palin. They don’t believe that she’s ready to be vice president.

"You’ve heard some grumblings within the Republican party," he continued, "that circular firing squad already kind of setting up, people blaming each other for John McCain’s fortunes right now. Do you think in retrospect, she was the best choice, and do you think your party would have been better served had he gone with a Joe Lieberman or had he gone with a Tom Ridge…"

"Or a Mitt Romney?" Ensign interjected. "There were some very, very talented people that he was considering. You remember, at the time, the Republican party was not fired up at all and she fired up the Republican party; and look at the crowds…"

Ensign continued, saying, "she was an initial great start and the campaign just completely mishandled her. What they tried to do is in traditional campaigns before 24-hour cable news, you had a situation where they always told you, ‘when you do your campaign speech, don’t get tired of hearing it yourself. Keep giving it, because you’re going to be in Pennsylvania one day, to Nevada the next, they’ve never heard your speech.’

"Well, they kept having Sarah Palin, for the first two weeks after the convention, give the same speech and people were saying, ‘She’s just an empty suit — all she does is give this little scripted speech, we’ve heard it all before,’" Ensign said.

"What they should have been doing at that time is briefing her on some of the international issues which she was absolutely inexperienced on — everybody knew that; she’s the governor of a state — a tremendous governor, a very popular governor, did a great job as the chief executive, but then they should have let her go a little bit, because she’s a great speaker, she’s great off the cuff, she’s doing a lot better this last week or so that they let her have a little more freedom, and she’s getting a little more comfortable with the issues…"

Pondered the member of GOP Senate Leadership, "Has she been a net negative? You could maybe make that argument, but I would blame some of the campaign handlers for her being that net negative because they did not handle her correctly."

Asked Gillan: "Do you think she’s qualified to be president?"

Ensign said, "I do not think that Barack Obama or her are experienced enough to be president of the United States — neither one of them, and Hillary Clinton was much more qualified to be president than Barack Obama was, but that’s who the nominee is.

"John McCain is much more qualified than Barack Obama and certainly, Joe Biden is much more qualified than Sarah Palin is," Ensign said. "I’d rather have the most qualified person at the top of the ticket, not number two."

- jpt

User Comments

Tell Us Something We Don’t Already Know!!

Posted by: RubyRed Republican | October 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Well he doesn’t think Obama is qualified either and he is running for president, not Palin.

Posted by: Maria | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Good to see some Republicans have a clue.

Posted by: Jwench | October 31, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

It’s all starting to crash down around McCain now, isn’t it. Palin was nothing more than a sugar rush…

Posted by: matt | October 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Not all Repubs are crazy after all!

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 31, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Who cares. I will be so glad when this election is over.

Posted by: Lucky Lucy | October 31, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

What was McCain thinking when he picked this woman? It says volumes about his judgment.

Posted by: Jwench | October 31, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Sarah Palin believes it violates her First Amendment rights if you criticize her for criticizing Obama.
What a terrible mistake McCain made – he shoulda picked Lieberman. I would have respected that.

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 31, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Hillary was more qualified than Obama? Nonsense. The only public office she ever held was the Senate, after her husband left office.
And that’s fine. The problem was she claimed decades of “experience” based on the fact that she was married to Bill.
Obama has been in the Senate for only couple of years, but he was in the Illinois legislature for something like 7 years before going to Washington.
Neither Hillary nor Obama have as many years of experience as McCain. It would be great if each had more.
However, their other qualities — brains and, particularly in Obama’s case, judgment, make up for that lack. I’m not too keen on either Obama or Hillary — but I’m even less keen on what the “experience” of the last eight years has brought us.
As for Palin, she is completely unqualified. There is no comparing this inexperienced, pridefully anti-intellectual, politically extreme “whackjob” to either Hillary and Obama — or to the many Republicans whom McCain should have picked instead.

Posted by: Skeptical independent | October 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

You mean Sarah is watching all episodes of the West Wing for nothing?

Posted by: MyVoiceHere | October 31, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

I used to support Sen. Obama, but what is the mainstream media and the Obama campaign trying to get at. so Sen. Ensign says of Gov. Palin “I do not think that Barack Obama or her are experienced enough to be president of the United States,” and the mainstream media titles the article “Member of Senate GOP Leadership: Palin Isn’t Experienced Enough to be President”? what about the “Member of Senate GOP Leadership: Obama Isn’t Experienced Enough to be President” part? and what’s the Obama campaign’s beef? given: Sen. Obama is not as experienced as Sen. McCain, but that doesn’t matter, because it’s judgement, and not experience that matters! but… when it comes to Gov. Palin, she’s unqualified because she’s inexperienced, aha.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 31, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

So many say the media favors Obama. I heard this morning over coffee from a Republican friend who said she’s grateful the media isn’t telling the whole Palin story. I said – huh? You mean she hasn’t been fully vetted and exposed yet? She said – Not yet. She said the media is still trying to put the complex story together. What I heard is tied to Palin’s overly long multi-college years learning to be a sports broadcaster, her time trying to be a beauty pageant queen and her unreleased medical records. But she didn’t/wouldn’t tell me much more. She left me curious as she said she already said too much. Then she went on to say – Palin and Dude 1 having to get married could be somehow connected…and that Palin could be living each day ridden with profound guilt. That’s it folks – a very incomplete second-hand story. But, factually told to me, as she knew it. The question that’s begs for an answer is – what are they hiding by not releasing Palin’s med records? Maybe mental problems? What?

Posted by: Pat from Phoenix, AZ | October 31, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

So many say the media favors Obama. I heard this morning over coffee from a Republican friend who said she’s grateful the media isn’t telling the whole Palin story. I said – huh? You mean she hasn’t been fully vetted and exposed yet? She said – Not yet. She said the media is still trying to put the complex story together. What I heard is tied to Palin’s overly long multi-college years learning to be a sports broadcaster, her time trying to be a beauty pageant queen and her unreleased medical records. But she didn’t/wouldn’t tell me much more. She left me curious as she said she already said too much. Then she went on to say – Palin and Dude 1 having to get married could be somehow connected…and that Palin could be living each day ridden with profound guilt. That’s it folks – a very incomplete second-hand story. But, factually told to me, as she knew it. The question that’s begs for an answer is – what are they hiding by not releasing Palin’s med records? Maybe mental problems? What?

Posted by: JJ Flash | October 31, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

The proof is in the way the campaigns have been run. Obama’s is smart, unified, disciplined, efficient, creative and CIVIL in a way we haven’t seen in years.
McCain’s? An erratic, disorganized, UGLY fiasco.
It’s clear that Obama’s judgement and intelligence has trumped McCain’s experience.
If the administration reflects the campaign, WHICH ONE WOULD YOU CHOOSE?
I’M VOTING OBAMA.

Posted by: Ed from MA | October 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

You mean Sarah is watching all episodes of the West Wing for nothing?
——————–
Now come on folks, you gotta admit, that’s pretty gosh darn funny.

Posted by: Dave in VA | October 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

what are they hiding by not releasing Palin’s med records? Maybe mental problems? What?
Posted by: Pat from Phoenix, AZ | Oct 31, 2008 8:03:38 PM
The way she has acted on the campaign trail, that’s possible.

Posted by: Jwench | October 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Now come on folks, you gotta admit, that’s pretty gosh darn funny.
Posted by: Dave in VA | Oct 31, 2008 8:06:10 PM
YOU BETCHA!

Posted by: Jwench | October 31, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

NOT EVERY BODY JUMP ON OBAMA MANIA
BAN WAGON.
HE IS SMART, BUT HE IS NOT STREET SMART.
SARAH! SARAH! SARAH!

Posted by: RINDY | October 31, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

You can pin some of the blame on McCain, but it was Palin who should get the most of it.
She knew she was not qualified, but she let ambition get in the way of common sense.
She is only good with scripted speeches, when she speaks on her own, she sounds stupid and if that is what gets Republicans excited, then they are a sad bunch of people.
She should have blinked, or at least not let her kids tell her to go for it.
The blame lies with the person who did not have the common sense to realize she was not the right person.

Posted by: lmg | October 31, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Obamacrat for McCain
That is why I havwe lost respect for all investigative journalists. Used to be it was unbiased reporting and the readers would decide. Editorials used to be for personal opinion. Maybe someday they will realize and get back to unbiased reporting.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Well he doesn’t think Obama is qualified either and he is running for president, not Palin.
Posted by: Maria |
********************************************
So we should base our decision on what GOP leadership says about the Democratic candidate?
Now that’s rational!

Posted by: Truth Matters | October 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

This was a somewhat misleading headline from Jake (surprise). For those who didn’t read the whole article, he also said that Obama isn’t qualified to be president and that McCain is.

Posted by: SP | October 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Palin’s major hurdle in the next cycle will be explaining her “pallin’ around” with the AIP, a radical organization that seeks the breakup of the United States.

Posted by: Lucky Lucy | October 31, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Ensign said, “I do not think that Barack Obama or her (Palin) are experienced enough to be president of the United States — neither one of them,
of course, the title of the post is ‘Palin not experienced enough to be Prez’ and you have to read to paragraph 10 of 11 to find out his actual quote. go figure.
Are they threatining to kick you off the plane, too, Mr. Tapper?

Posted by: jack | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Still crazy after all these years! John McCain

Posted by: mitch | October 31, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Its hard to find a more revered and loved American than Andy Griffith. When I think of a true American I think of him. Andy Griffith stands for truth and wisdom, and has been considered a faithful veteran, and someone who would never support communism. Andy grew up when the world was under attack by nationalism, and then he was a part of our national fight against communism. Often during his show, The Andy Griffith Show he would teach us lessons on right and wrong, and what the true American way is. His son in the show, famed director Ron Howard is also considered an American icon, and someone you can trust to do the right thing for America. Ron and Andy have put their support behind Barack Obama for President, because they believe he represents the BEST for America. They would NEVER support someone who didnt love this country as much as they do, nor would they support someone who was a threat to us all. Lets all be like Andy Griffith and vote for Barack Obama! Lets make America the America that Andy Griffith believes in! Obama/Biden, as American as apple pie!

Posted by: Fairfax | October 31, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

the scary thing in all this is how the main stream media seems to be not reporting for once creating a big issue as to why wont NObama or why is he not showing or telling us really where he was born. here the goverment is spending millions and millions od tax payers dollars to keep illegals out and here we are in the verge of selecting a guy who we dont even know if he’s really a true american citizen. have we become that brain washed do to todays main stream media that we or some dont even question this mayor issue that this guy can run for president of the US and may not even be an american citizen. GIVE ME A BREAK !!!! like john would say. have we become like the majority of your main stream engeneers that we were brain washed in school and have no common sense. people wake up and do your reseach. what about that special that nightline had on NObama on the projects he was invloved while in chicago ?? and who is sending NObama all this fundraising money 150 million in one month where is all that money coming from oversees ? and why and from whom. Do your research why do oversees people really want him as our next president ?? what about that attorney who is suing Nobama to show his birth certificate and why wont he show it. see what I mean way to many questions but the biggest of them all is where is the media in all of this. aren’t they the ones that we should try to rely on to do all this research and bring it to the forfront and why aren’t they ?? Hmm NoBama did just pay them a big piece of that fundraising money to advertize with all of the networks. HMM

Posted by: Miguel | October 31, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Vote in McCain and make America look like the game Fallout 3!

Posted by: JJ | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Umm, Lucy? Are you just copy-and-pasting nonsense from Kos? That was her husband, and the AIP is about as “radical” as Ron Paul. Which is to say they’ve got the generally right idea, but a few too many nuts to appeal to regular folks.

Posted by: Dirt McGirt | October 31, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Well, Jake, this is exceptional even for you.
In case you missed it, Sen. Ensign stated that neither Obama nor Palin were qualified on foreign policy enough to be president.
Yet you only include Palin in your title. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Biased headline much? Ensign said that he doesn’t think Obama is qualified to be president–he’s at the top of the ticket Jake. Oh. Wait. That won’t keep your seat on the plane though, will it?

Posted by: Michelle | October 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

I think Jake is running for front row center seat in the press conferences to come if Obama wins.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Bill Clinton, stumping for Obama. Doesn’t sound very reassuring.
“I haven’t cleared this with him and he may even be mad at me for saying this so close to the election, but I know what else he said to his economic advisers (during the crisis),” Clinton told the crowd at a Wednesday night rally with Obama in Florida. “He said, ‘Tell me what the right thing to do is. What’s the right thing for America? Don’t tell me what’s popular. You tell me what’s right — I’ll figure out how to sell it.’”
Clinton said when the crisis broke, Obama called his own advisers as well as those of the former two-term president, Hillary Clinton, Warren Buffet and others.
“He called those people. You know why? Because he knew it was complicated and before he said anything he wanted to understand,” Clinton said. “That’s what a president does in a crisis.”
And don’t argue, that that’s what a President does, because I read the scorn McCain took for his part. Obame didn’t seem to do much better, but get better press from the whole debacle.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Remind me:
What were Bill Clinton’s foreign policy credentials before being elected president?
Nothing, oh, that’s what I thought.

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Lucy is right. The AIP seeks to break Alaska away from the Union, which the South tried a couple hundred years ago and got stomped for it. They are traitorous people, and a dangerous group. Sarah is in with them, and she will subvert America if shes given the chance.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well this story has already been disputed, by even some in the msm’s…so I can only gather, that you get your news from HuffPo, or DK!

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Jeanie,
Right. And, the Obama (D-ACORN, seeking Bill Clinton’s advice on the economy.
Is that what they mean by hopey-changey?

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

What were Bill Clinton’s foreign policy credentials before being elected president?
Nothing, oh, that’s what I thought.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Exactly Right, Captain.
Carter had the same non experience in foreign affairs. Which leads me to believe, that not only are Democrats racist, but sexist as well. Look how they treated Hilary!
By the way, did you hear we’ve been judged as selfish, for not wanting to pay higher taxes? Unpatriotic as well.
I guess Obama is God!

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

does ABC, and the rest of the media, just do this because they get a kick out of us normal americans getting furious on here after they manipulate the news??? did it ever dawn on you the title of this should have been: MEMBER OF SENATE GOP LEADERSHIP: BOTH PALIN AND OBAMA NOT EXPERIENCED ENOUGH TO BE PRESIDENT” ???? absolutley ridiculous…

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Oh I get it, so Bill Clinton is saying he never seeked advice on any issues while he was the president? He was just instantly wise, eh?

Posted by: Pedro | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Boris
There are people and groups in every state that talk the same way. It is not just privy to Alaska. You want to see the results of democratic rule, just look at NY Estimated 47 Billion defecit in 4 years.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Obama, at one point in his life, feel
that he was betray by his country.
This show up, when he chose his
friends in his early peroid of his life.
He is not alway a patriot of this country.

Posted by: rindy | October 31, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Cripes. Even Joe Biden said Obama wasn’t experienced enough.
I guess giving someone a title higher than Senator, is a good mind changer.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

well its not a voting issue, but i do need to comment on this. alaska was brought in the union for its RESOURCES. the nation was looking to the future, and wanted alaska for its oil reserves. now, the liberal idiots that control the democratic party these days, wont let us drill there and use it for its original intentions.

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Jeanie,
When you are The Messiah and Mr. Hopey-Changey, you can call people names who don’t agree with you, and throw reporters out of your airplane in favor of crockumentary producers.
That’s the “change we need?”

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

As one poster here a day or two ago. Remeber the story of the Pied Piper.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

democratic
We do and you just choose to either not read them or not believe them. Your loss. I guess the magic flute is still playing.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I was just floored today, at the video of the woman at an Obama rally, who truly thinks that money from the government(Tax payers) would take care of her needs , from here on out.
I just can’t believe people out there, believe that will happen. It’s so sad to me.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Captain America
I guess the freedom of the press and the first amendment is the first to go. Stand by for more

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

why do people think Sen. Obama is a unifier? Because he says he is? why do people think he listens to the other side? Because he says he does? He said small-town Pennsylvanians are “bitter” that’s why they “cling to their guns and religion,” and he says their bigotted. nevermind you don’t have to be bitter to value your right to bear arms enshrined in the United States Constitution, and faith! He says it’s a way to “explain their frustrations.” How does he figure? really, has he ever talked to a small-town Pennsylvanian?

Posted by: Clintonites for McCain | October 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

America is blue. America is red. America is gray. America is sick. Why are we sick? We’re sick because Americans that won’t work and strive to excel want the government to take the money of those who do work, and redistribute it to them. We’re sick because politicians are taking our money to fix the problems they have caused, and then come back for more because they didn’t take enough. America, it’s time to CLEAN HOUSE. Find the candidates that want to give the power back to the people instead of growing the government even bigger. We have got to grasp that BIGGER government means taking more of our money to fund it. Collapse is coming to our wonderful nation if the American people do not stand up to all those with their hands out, and say NO.

Posted by: tiaa | October 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

I think of Joe the Plumber as just an american with his own point of view and has the right to express it as we all do. Actually I believe I heard him say that he was at first leaning toward Obama. I don’t know what made him change. I applaud him for his courage to withstand the press the way he has. ould you have. Also I have noticed that the press hasn’t dug into the personal lives of those on the Obamamercial the other night.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

clintonites…
exactly!!! very well said. listen, im not a huge fan of mccain, but i think if america was to STAY ON HIS ***, and activism stayed as strong as it is right now, there would be hope ith him to get things accomplished. he has a history of working with democrats. HE HAS A HISTORY PERIOD!! i just dont understand why so many are putting soooo much faith in a guy that has proven nothing. its because americans love a good “story”, and thy want to believe this movie has a happy ending. i see it as going all in with a pair of deuces.

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

tiaa..
i couldnt agree more. perfectly said.

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

The full quote about “qualified”:
Asked Gillan: “Do you think she’s qualified to be president?”
Ensign said, “I do not think that Barack Obama or her are experienced enough to be president of the United States — neither one of them, and Hillary Clinton was much more qualified to be president than Barack Obama was, but that’s who the nominee is.
“John McCain is much more qualified than Barack Obama and certainly, Joe Biden is much more qualified than Sarah Palin is,” Ensign said. “I’d rather have the most qualified person at the top of the ticket, not number two.”
Hmm… Jakey, jakey, jakey. little bit of liberty there with the quote isn’t there? But, gotta keep Axelrod and Obama happy…right? Maybe you should put a disclaimer near your byline…you know, Jake Tapper from the Obama Campaign Plane.

Posted by: Michelle | October 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

tiaa
I will give my views on welfare to all and see if they agree. Welfare is supposed to be a help in time of need, not a way of life. There should be a limit on the amount of time you can collect. You should get more than a worker on minimum wage does, no matter what. No Food stamps. You would get the block cheese, spam, powdered milk etc. that the people of our grandfathers and fathers time did. No cell phones, and designer closthes. If you can afford those then you don’t need welfare. Just my opinion folks.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

a veteren…
i fully agree. there always has been, and always will be people that truly need some help. and if we live in the land of oppurtunity, and freedom, we should be able to help. but you’re exactly right: it should not be a way of life. i think a huge majority of americans would agree with us. so let me ask this: how did welfare get to the point its at right now in our country?

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Obama threw 3 reporters, from newspapers, that support McCain, off of his plane today.
He’s told a tv station in Florida, no more interviews, for asking hard questions of Obama. The same message went to another station in Pennsylvania.
Does this sound like a man that’s centrist? Works with others, well? Will be bi partisan, and include all schools of thought, on the issues? Only if they tow the line with his thinking.
This is but a mere picture of what the future will be like. Chavez started out the same way.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Jeanie, I hope your candidate does not do what Lincoln did in allowing the country to go to war against itself with truly unknown losses in life and destruction of its economy. The conflict was fought over state rights something BHO wants to take away and place in the control of Washington. While there will not be an armed conflict there will be much dissension within the populace.

Posted by: William | October 31, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Bush and the Republicans have bankrupted the country!
You don’t have any personal wealth left unless you are filthy rich and one of the favored under the Republican regime of the past 8 years.
Have you not being paying attention to the Economic news? The wealth is gone, people have already lost their homes, lost their jobs.
The Republicans have already taken and destroyed the wealth. It’s now in the hands of the oil, banking and military/industrial pals of Bush, Cheney, etc.
That’s their special brand of welfare.
They have looted and largely destroyed the country.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

The problem for Obama (D-ACORN) is that he is vastly over promising on what he can deliver. And it’s getting worse all the time.
They are just now starting to look at all the outlandish promises he is making and dropping the income tax threshold from $250k > to $200k > to $150k > to now $120k.
How can anyone believe this guy anymore?

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

tim
I honestly don’t know. I know our county tried to put them to doing a little work wherever it was needed. The welfare rolls dropped dramatically. Then some one ssaid about unconstitutional and we are back again. We have second and third generation welfare families here. It needs to stop. I am the first to help if someone shows me they have true need. But it should not be a way of life.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Yep, Jake. You stretched this one to the breaking point. The interview was net positive Palin but your spin had me looking for the pony. ’twas none. Maybe the fungus that is affecting Stephanopoulos is getting to you.

Posted by: jcarob | October 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Think of all the charities that will suffer now, due to higher taxes. If half of our income goes to taxes, and with Pelosi, and Reid, I think it will, since we’re so selfish…and unpatriotic….there won’t be a whole lot left, for charities.
Obama wants to continue ethanol production, even though it’s already shown, it doesn’t do a lot of good. So why keep tapping into food resources, for fuel? Now with Pelosi and Reid saying they will put the ban back on drilling, watch for fuel prices,and food prices to skyrocket.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

pefros
What bankrupted it were the greedy people. Banks. Mortgage Insurance. Sub prime mortagages. People looking to buy, sell and turn a profit. The fed govt. collected 2.6 trillion from the 50 states in 2007. Congress just didn’t know how to spend it wisely.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

pefros,
We all advocate for change, but it is important to know what kind of change you want.
Obama (D-ACORN) cannot possibly deliver on all the promises he is making in hopes of getting elected: universal health care, free college education for everyone, etc. etc.
Do you really want to elect a dishonest, dishonorable, and wholly unqualified man (Obama) because he says change?

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

pefros,
Obama (D-ACORN) was the highest benefactor of Fannie/Freddie largess despite his only serving less than 4 years in office.

Posted by: Captain America | October 31, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

The welfare system of this country
so bad. There are welfare for the rich
and welfare for poor.
I want to know when these people will start working for living and help this
country that they profess to love.
This is why I am independence.

Posted by: rindy | October 31, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

The question that’s begs for an answer is – what are they hiding by not releasing Palin’s med records? Maybe mental problems? What?
Posted by: Pat from Phoenix, AZ | Oct 31, 2008 8:03:38 PM
***********************
Why Palin have not release her medical records?
Possible reasons:
1)The baby is not hers (2nd daughter’s child)
2)She had an abortion
3)STD
4)Her first child is not her husband
5)Drug or Alcohol Abuse
6)She’s really a undercover Democrat!!!!
LoL!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

jeanie…
thank you. see, the problem with voting for obama isnt JUST obama!!! its the radical left taking over the democratic party. obama? pelosi? reid? frank? dodd? these are just a number of the “leaders” in the democratic party. 9 percent approval rating the last time i checked. we DO need to vote for change alright.

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Sorry you Republicans, I don’t buy your smears campaign you’re using to try to cover up the disaster that was the last 8 years of Republicans in the White House.
There is no need to smear the Republican party, it’s performance over the past 8 years smears itself.
Despite all of your desperate attempts to shift focus away from these major failures, the large part of the public has just had enough.
The electorate is about to rightfully boot the Republicans out of office.
Democratic landslide win.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Have you not being paying attention to the Economic news? The wealth is gone, people have already lost their homes, lost their jobs.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For 8 years, and 17 times this year alone, Bush warned about the downfall on the economy, due to the mismanagement of Frannie, and Freddie. Who were with ACORN complicit, in the sub prime loans, that tanked the economy. There are other factors, and both sides are to blame, but there was a bill brought forward , to try to bring regulation , and all the Republicans voted for it,none of the Democrats voted for it.
Barney Franks lied, when he said things were fine, was having a relationship with an exec at one of these entities (conflict of interest) and did nothing, but say things were fine, and it was racist to bring it up.
All of these, are Democrat programs. Bush is not soleley to blame. He had help by Franks, Pelosi, Reid, Waters, Schumer, Dodd.
I’m sure you felt elation , and still do, at the falling gas prices. Remember? These are the prices we were paying a few years back…BEFORE the Democrats took control of Congress. Now if they were so concerned, why did Obama instead of finding ways to lower the costs for us consumers, want to put a tax hike in place, on top of an already to high tax on gas?
Why did he say he wouldn’t be unhappy if gas reached $12 a gallon? Why? Because we the tax payers pay for their cars, car rentals, and gas. What does he care, that the rest of us have to pay that much?

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Jeannie you Republican shills will blame the last 8 years on anybody but the Republicans.
It’s a shame your weren’t taught when you were young to take responsibility for your actions.
8 years of Republicans in the White House was more than enough. Despite your frantic attempts to blame the failures on others, or scare people away from the Democrats . .. it’s over.
Republicans over 8 years = Incompetence.
The big boot is coming.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

pefros…
im a CONSERVATIVE not a republican. and i will agree, the republicans have screwed up, most but not all, for the last 8 years. i will criticize a republican just as quick as a democrat. i believe mccain would have turned the election into a landslide victory if he would have been the one to come out STRONGLY against the bailout. he should have done what a number of other repubs did in congress, and said no to it both times. but he didnt. what little confidence i had in him went right out the window. but he is still a better canidate than obama. hands down. i will not vote like our nation is a movie and we are getting the “happy ending from obama. i, and alot of other americans, know change is needed. but what kind of change?

Posted by: tim | October 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

pefros
You seem to think all republicans are happy with the last 8 years. No we aren’t happy that Clinton couldn’t do the job with Bin Laden, and 3000 people had to die and our tropps had to get involved. We aren’t totally happy with the way the war has gone. We aren’t happy with high prices for oil, food etc. We aren’t happy seeing our hard earned money disappear in our 401K, etc. But we aren’t stupid enoough to believe a man with zero experience, or the joker Biden at his side have the knowledge or experience to fix it. It will only get worse as history shows with capital gains tax being raised. Obama wants to keep McCain linked with Bush because of Bush’s lack of popularity. McCain isn’t Bush. McCain is someone who has fought against his own party. He challenges you to look at his record yourself. He can’t be bought as you can see by his campaign donations. He has waged a campain on one 5th the amount of Obama’s. You want a guy who would spend almost a billion dollars on a campaign???

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

We have seen a massive redistribution of wealth over the past 8 years – a movement of more and more wealth towards the upper 5% of the population at the expense of the middle and lower income groups.
While many have suffered from this redistribution of wealth, Bush, Cheney, McCain and their pals in the oil, banking and military/industrial families have made off like bandits.
A massive welfare scheme to benefit the wealthy elite compliments of the establishment party – the Republicans.
Sorry, you had your feast at the trough. The electorate is about to give the Republicans the boot.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Pefros, everyone already knows that Frannie, and Freddie, and ACORN were complicit. If you refuse to acknowledge that….not my problem.
You see what you want to see, and I’m sure you see riches headed your way. I can only take pity on you, if that day comes, because you will be sorely disappointed.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

pefros
I would love for Obama to take responsibilty for his past dealings with the Oldinga, Farrakhan, Wright, Rezko, Acorn etc. Give us the whole details. How about responsibilty for over 100 votes of present so he wouldn’t have to take a side. At least McCain has the character to make a vote and stick by it. I like that character. One who isn’t afraid of criticism.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Jeannie we’ve seen what the establishment party the Republicans have done for America.
Disgraced internationally, bankrupted beyond belief at home, economy in turmoil, elitist rich making off like bandits.
Time is up. The electorate won’t buy your Rove styled lies and distractions.
You are guilty of VAST incompetence, hoarding and greed, arrogance and bullying.
The electorate is about to boot the Republicans out of the White House.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

a movement of more and more wealth towards the upper 5% of the population at the expense of the middle and lower income groups.
and this top 5% pays 80% of the tax burden in this country, provides the jobs, thru their investments, and income.
Do you do this much, for the country? Most people that are what you call “rich” worked for their money, and still do. They educated themselves ,and set off , making their way.
Why do you feel you’re entitled to this money? You didn’t earn it, or work for it! Why do you think they should be punished, and you should just be handed money? If you want wealth, go get it. Opportunities are out there…for now….but if Obama is president, no one will work harder for wealth, if they’re going to be taxed in the way he wants to tax them.
Those companies sending jobs overseas? Just see what happens when they get taxed more. They’ll pack up, and send everything overseas, and more jobs will be lost. Obama’s $3,000 for each new job, is not enough for these companies to compensate with, for a full years salary, and benefits.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

And Obama is experienced enough to be president with How much experience?
Dave

Posted by: Dave Barber | October 31, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

rindy – welfare accounts for 1% of the federal budget. in the state i live in, more people on welfare work than do not (that means they may get schips for their kids, or medicaid for a pregnancy – in fact most families have children young and on medicaid). teachers are on welfare here – because they don’t make enough money to pay for rent on their wages alone. more white people are on welfare than black people in the us. ever looked up welfare numbers in alaska?

Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

um, jeannie were you sleeping when john mccain through reporters from time and the new york times off his plane a couple weeks ago? obama did not take 3 reporters off his plane – he took two – and offered them both seats on the biden plane. the same offer was not made to the nyt and time. is john mccain hugo chavez? he seems to have a similar temperament.

Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Sorry, the public has seen the Republicans feasting at the trough and destroying the country for 8 years.
That’s enough. People are not completely blind and they’re fair minded.
Republicans had their chance – and look at the results. A disaster.
Time to move your snouts out of the trough and get some employment doing actual work.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

pefros
The only true rich are the people behind the federal Reserve Bank. That is the rockefeller, carnegie, morgan, rothschild people. Look up and research the federal reserve. It isn’t government owned it is privately owned. Think how that came about.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Disgraced internationally, bankrupted beyond belief at home, economy in turmoil, elitist rich making off like bandits.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You know what? In two wars, we stood next to other countries, to defend them. At this point, I really don’t give a fig what other nations think. Most of them, are socialist, and want us to become what they are. Thus stripping us, of what we always have been. A free country. No…not every President is perfect, but I want to keep it free, and a free enterprise system. That’s what makes this country great, and unique. If you hate it so bad, head on down to Venezuela and try out socialism for a year. I guarantee you won’t like it.
You don’t see hoards of Americans getting out of America…and for one reason. Most know , you won’t find it better anywhere else, than here.
I’m so sick of people telling me how bad this country is. I’m proud of my country, and all she stands for, and I don’t want to trade that in, for massive unemployment, and a health care system run by a government.

Posted by: Jeanie | October 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

good lord. i am becoming illiterate. i meant john mccain threw reporters off his plane.not through and not literally.
now what are the names of those secretaries of state? one, two, three, eagleberger… powell… oh yeah schultz!

Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Anyhow, it’s going to be a Democratic landslide so I hope the Republicans have the decency to go with some democratic dignity, instead of scratching and crying and whining and blaming.
Grow up.

Posted by: pefros | October 31, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

pefros
Now you want to label republicans as a whole as non-working people. I worked all of my life. No one gave me anything. I own what I have. NO debt. Have everything I need. Did it all on less than 50,000 household income. How much do you owe. How much do you actually own. It isn’t republicans saying give me a handout from the rich.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I’m tired of Republicans who continue to discount Governor Palin’s executive experience and put her on a par with Senator Obama. Obama’s experience is all about running his mouth and running for president. He has had an unprecedented budget of $600 million and is such a poor financial executive that he is still asking for more money to spend. After outspending his opponent, what has Obama got? A lost race. Poor management all around. As governor, Palin has successfully conducted negotiations with a foreign country, stood as advisor to oil and gas rich countries, and has brought fiscal probity to Alaska. Moreover, she’s helped to root out corruption in her state. It’s a pity that Ensign and Eagleburger have not taken the time to read Governor Palin’s bio. Had they done so, they would have spared themselves idiotic comparisons with between a doer, Palin, and a talker, Obama.

Posted by: SilentWatcher | October 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

pefros
You won’t hear me complain and whine. I know what tough time are. I can weather the coming storm. It will the Pied Piper children after the magic flute stops playing that will be whining about what is to come. I hope you are man enough to take that without whining and crying. After all you will be one who helped him to be there.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

>>> SilentWatcher | Oct 31, 2008 9:41:57 PM
_____________________
THANK YOU!

Posted by: e pluribus union | October 31, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Posted by: Jeanie | Oct 31, 2008 9:25:57 PM
******************
Governor Sarah Palin said that she will release her medical records this week.
I believe the viciousness is when a politician goes back on their word!!!!!
I am not running for VP but I do believe that I have the right to voice my opinion whether I step on your sensitive toes!!!!
Would you contact Palin and ask her to release her medical records unless she has something to HIDE!!!!!
BECAUSE IT DOES MATTER TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!
SHE GAVE AMERICA, HER WORD!!!!!!
Thank you!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I think it’s sad that they’re already blaming her handlers. She was sitting alone when she did her interviews with Couric and Gibson. (Notice with Brian Williams she was chaperoned by McCain)
Palin gave the bizarre answers in her interviews, not her handlers, such as saying she knows foreign policy because Alaska borders Russia and Canada.
McCain didn’t know her and he didn’t really vet her as he should have. It was a poor decision that reflects mostly on McCain.
Palin was obviously not ready for prime time. She wasn’t really familiar with national and international issues. Her handlers are not magicians.

Posted by: cincyr | October 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

e pluribus union
They were afraid of little old Sarah and had to go after her to take away the threat to the Obama Presidency. After kimd old Obama said hands off the family. That was just the go world to start digging boys. I think she has handled all the adversity just fine. Much better than Obama has by refusing intervies, kicking no compliant reporters off the plane etc etc. Funny thing is when you are in the white house you can’t run, you can’t hide and you can’t stop the press. There won’t be a McCain then for the news. He will then get the scrutiny he deserves.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

‘Would you contact Palin and ask her to release her medical records unless she has something to HIDE!!!!!
BECAUSE IT DOES MATTER TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!’
___________
Her records are forthcoming, but:
WHERE THE HECK ARE OBAMA’S MEDICAL RECORDS? OR SCHOOL RECORDS? OR RECORDS FROM THE STATE LEGISLATURE?
He’s running for the top spot.
WE NEED TO SEE THESE RECORDS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: e pluribus union | October 31, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

sisterdearest09
Kind of one sided again. WHat do her medical records have to do with anything. Make the same demands of you Obama. Release college transcripts, birth certificates, all other records that are being asked of him.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Many McCain supporters are quick to tell us about the “wonderful” experience of Palin. She was first a mayor of a tiny town of 5,000… then she served 18 months as Governor of Alaska, a state with the population of a city like Memphis. She has a VERY basic education…not that McCain has an impressive education.
McCain has been a US Senator for 20 years. He is known more for his uncontrollable temper than for any real accomplishments.
Obama was first elected to the Illinois Senate 12 years ago. He is also the only candidate with an impressive education.
So… the only “executive” experience award goes to Palin. McCain has more Senate experience than Obama… after all, he IS 72 years old. Obama is very well educated and has served several years in the State and US Senate.
We all knows McCain was a POW. So what?
As far as I am concerned, I have no problem voting for an Obama/Biden ticket.
McCain was not able to select a competent VP pick. He was not able to run a decent campaign… Why would we think he would have a competent administration? Does he really think earmarks are more important to Americans than jobs and healthcare?

Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

sisterdearest09
When I mentioned welfare here in my county I said neither black or white. It is a problem that needs to be resolved. Honest hard working Americans of all races don’t need their taxes going to people who want welfare as a way of life. In the old days on the farms and homes it was if you don’t work, don’t eat. Your choice.

Posted by: A Veteran | October 31, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

pefros;
Do you mean that we should blindly give our vote to Obama simply because he is not a Republican?
What if some of us believe that Obama is more Bush than McCain is?
(Hell, even their campaigns are ultra similar! And Bush managed to spend almost the same outrageous amount of money on HIS run that Obama is pissing away on his!)
In fact, it’s like looking at Bozo! (Bush), and Bozo 2 (Obama),,,,, and if you put the two together, except for their color, they would be indestinguishable!
Honest!
OH MY GOSH!
It’s believable!

Posted by: ENOUGH ALREADY!!! | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 31, 2008 9:57:58 PM
Posted by: e pluribus union | Oct 31, 2008 9:55:56 PM
**********************
Wasn’t Obama the editor of the Harvard Review!!!!!!
Not one sided at all!!!!
You and the media just want to scrutinized his INTELLIGENT!!!!!!
But Palin promise to release her medical records this week!!!!
And they are not forth coming!!!
NBC’s World Nightly News are waiting!!!
Thank you!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

In the old days on the farms and homes it was if you don’t work, don’t eat. Your choice.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 31, 2008 10:09:17 PM
********************
That’s the problem, the old days!!!!
Do you see people in other country starving???
The system is not perfect and have many flaws but could you see your fellow man/woman/child hungry????
I believe that is why FDR create the NEW DEAL and WELFARE!!!!!
Too many people were STARVING AND OUT OF WORK!!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

If McCain pulls this thing off. Sarah will be the first VP candidate since 1960 to carry the #1 on the ticket to victory. The media wants you to think she is a mistake. But the reality is, she may be the most charismatic most gifted politician of our time. She is amazing.

Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

“Too many people were STARVING AND OUT OF WORK!!!!!!”
I believe that was why Roosevelt also set up Poor Houses…. and Potter Fields and other such niceties because as great a president as he was, there was just so much that he could do!
So maybe it’s time to bring back the Poor Houses one again.
What do you think, sister d?

Posted by: ENOUGH ALREADY!!! | October 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

come off it, sister smearest,
Obama’s records have been sealed! The only reason we know he went to Pakistan after his fling at Occidental, was because he DIDN’t use a US Passport. (Isn’t That interesting?)
But HIS medical and school and senate records might as well have been flushed down the toilet for all intents and purposes…. because they apparently are hidden in the bowels of a fire breathing dragon….and unavailable to the voters!
WHY IS THAT?
WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?
WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!

Posted by: E PLURIBUS UNION | October 31, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

That’s strange. I read that the guy said neither Obama nor Palin is qualified to be president and he would rather see the most qualified person been on top of the ticket. Which means the McCain/Palin ticket is a stronger ticket, but yet Tapper’s headline only talks about Palin. Why?

Posted by: coolrepublica | November 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

If I’ve done my math correctly, I’m giving Obama 369 electoral votes.
I am lamenting the short, could-have-been-brilliant career of Sarah Palin.
Over the past eight years, the Republican Party has imploded. In this election cycle, the conservative intelligentsia has effectively split from the “base,” that portion of the party that is seemingly “excited” or “energized” not by issues of war or oil or the economy but by those that forge a social wedge. Add to that the shifting demographics of America and the Republican Party’s woeful inability to attract people of color, and there is a very real possibility that for the foreseeable future the Republicans will be reduced to a nonentity within politics.
The Republicans desperately need their Barack Obama.
It could have been Sarah Palin.
Could have been, except for John McCain’s gut-check, Hail Mary, game-changing, unvetted decision to take an inexperienced “small town” politician and dump her on the national stage with little more than 60 days to go before votin’ time.
Palin instantly struck a chord with the “don’t care about nothing except ‘values’ portion of the party.” What Palin brought to the ticket was an ability to blunt the Democrats’ message of change — personified by Obama and Hillary Clinton and even Bill Richardson on a national level — while being able to speak the language of “values” with the GOP base.
However — token hire that she was — Palin 1.0 alienated Republicans who don’t support affirmative action that puts the under qualified at the front of the line. (And I give those Republicans credit for at least being consistent on the question of capability.)
Seriously, can you imagine what it might have been like if — starting at this year’s Republican National Convention, much as with Obama in 2004 — Palin had been given a slow and thoughtful rollout? You don’t have to be a Palin supporter to acknowledge — tested, vetted and brought up to speed — she would have been positioned to truly lead her party, as opposed to merely appearing as the illegitimate love child of Dan Quayle and Geraldine Ferraro.
That is not to say Palin couldn’t be rehabilitated within the next four years. Hey, if Nixon could make a comeback…
But McCain’s missteps, the taint of failure following his loss, and questions that will surely linger about the woman herself give much ammunition to those in her own party who would potentially run against her.
Palin’s major hurdle in the next cycle will be explaining her “pallin’ around” with the AIP, a radical organization that seeks the breakup of the United States.
That is quite a lot, and I haven’t even mentioned having to live down the catchphrase “I can see Russia from my house.” However, overcoming all of that — as Reagan overcame the vapid actor tag — is only going to make the governor all the stronger. If so, Palin 2.0 will be a force to be reckoned with.

Posted by: Nerdy Ned | November 1, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 31, 2008 9:40:01 PM
Anyhow, it’s going to be a Democratic landslide so I hope the Republicans have the decency to go with some democratic dignity, instead of scratching and crying and whining and blaming.
Grow up.
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 31, 2008 9:40:01 PM
To the poster who posted this:
Anyhow, it’s going to be a Democratic landslide so I hope the Republicans have the decency to go with some democratic dignity, instead of scratching and crying and whining and blaming.
Grow up.
________________________________________
Surely you have not forgotten the whining and fussing and lack of dignity aafter the 2004 election when you liberal Democrats kept holloring sayijng Bush stole the election. I call that whining, crying etc.

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Democrats are not running on their policies, they are running on the past administration. They are not campaigning against McCain, they are campaining against Bush.
Bush’s time is up folks and McCain IS NOT Bush no matter what you might think.
Obama has already said that he will not be able to fulfill his promises to you in 100 days but instead it probably will take more like 1,000 days. I guess he figures it will take his millions of advisers that long to tell him what to do since he does not know how to fix what he has saidneeded fixing.
He is a lame excuse for President. He has no experience at all when it comes to doing anything but raising taxes. He voted to raise taxes on anyone making 42,000.00. Now you believe his hot air about not raising your taxes unless first he said 250,000 then 200,000 then 150,000 and now the Gov. of New Mexico says he means 120,000. By the time he get ready to tax everyone it will be back to the 42,000 income bracket.
Wake up before it is too late.
Remember Rev. Wright. Obama sat in his church for 20 years holloring AMEN to his anti white, anti American (God Damn America comments. He did not even denounce him until he was caught up with and then he really did not want to but HAD to get a few more votes.
Heavens help us if this goon is elected.

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Palin is running for Vice President, not President. If the reporter were not so biased the headline would have read: Member of Senate GOP Leadership: Obama Isn’t Experienced Enough to be President.

Posted by: Diehard | November 1, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Let’s see…a president should also have integrity and sound judgement, both of which, John McCain has shown he does not possess.

Posted by: ziadora | November 1, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

With an IQ of 130 Obama is not exactly the brightest bulb in the room and then add ignorance on top of that.

Posted by: Diehard | November 1, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

Jeanie -
Enough with the “facts” cherry picking. When Obama bumbs someone from his plane, it presages a Hugo Chavez regime. You’re either ignoring the fact that McCain’s done the same thing or you don’t know that he has.
He literally left Maureen Dowd of the NY Times stranded at the Pittsburgh airport and more recently banned Joe Klein of Time from his press plane. He also refused to appear on CNN because of the grilling that one of his hacks took from a CNN reporter.
By the way, the Orlando talking head who asked Biden if Obama was a “Marxist” was the station’s “health reporter” whose husband is a Republican consultant. No wonder her questions sounded like wingnut talking points.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 1, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev.. “if you look at the polling, the people who are voting against John McCain say the primary reason they’re voting against him is because of Sarah Palin. They don’t believe that she’s ready to be vice president.
Well, DUH

Posted by: AudreyA | November 1, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

My nose must be broken because this doesn’t pass the smell test… I wonder what he’s worried about turning up when Palin starts doing one of her soon-to-be assigned duties…
CC

Posted by: CapedConservative | November 1, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

AMEN TO THAT!

Posted by: TRUE AMERICAN FOR OBAMA/BIDEN | November 1, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Sen. Ensign: “I do not think that Barack Obama or her are experienced enough to be president of the United States.”
And that equals:
“Member of Senate GOP Leadership: Palin Isn’t Experienced Enough to be President”
It reminds me of “Karl Rove says both campaigns have been less than honest,” which equaled, “John McCain has been dishonest.” The Obama campaign seized on it in statements to the press (the irony and the hypocrisy – they’re criticizing McCain for lack of honesty while being dishonest about what Karl Rove said. And if I’m not mistaken, the Democrats even made a commercial about it.
Both of these are bald-faced smears from the self-proclaimed “honest” side about the “dishonest.”
No wonder Pew Research says 70% of Americans believe most reporters want to see Obama elected (“Most Voters Say News Media Wants Obama to Win”)

Posted by: Erika | November 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

All these Republican leaders are telling the truth about Palin. She should have left the stage long ago with her low IQ tail stuck between her legs. How embarrassing for her to hear fellow GOPS diss her. McCain too.

Posted by: buzziea | November 1, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

In it, I pointed out that the headline only mentions Ensign questioning Palin’s readiness for President, but left out him also questioning Obama’s, which is not balanced. My post also said something similar happened when Karl Rove said both campaigns had been less than honest, but Obama’s campaign and the media afterward portrayed it as Rove had only criticized McCain, which was itself dishonest even as the topic was honesty and McCain was being falsely singled out. Then it mentioned that Pew Research had found in a poll that 70% of Americans feel the press wants Obama to win, and that I thought they believed that with good reason. Mr Tapper himself has written: “I want this to be a place where people of all political stripes can engage in lively, civil debates.” Is there something I’m missing here?

Posted by: Erika | November 2, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

buzziea
Palin’s IQ is 130, the same as Obama’s. Maybe it is time for him to march his puny little butt off the stage also.

Posted by: Diehard | November 2, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.