By Julia Hoppock

Oct 2, 2008 12:22pm

Motorsports Racetrack Property Aid? Puerto Rico Rum Taxes? In the Economic Rescue Bill?

The Senate Finance Committee has published a summary of some of the additions to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act.

There are many provisions in the bill that will directly benefit millions of Americans — what’s called the "AMT patch," for instance, which will protect 20 million middle class Americans from seeing a tax increase in 2009.

Or tax deductions for tuition, and for teacher expenses.

Corporations will see extensions of popular tax cuts — for research and development, or renewable energies.

But there’s also some other stuff.

My colleague Z. Bryon Wolf points out that it bears mentioning that all of the following provisions were in the "tax extender" package the Senate (and the House) had already voted on, but were arguing over whether or not to "pay for."

But what’s in here also bears mentioning:

* Rum Excise Taxes to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands — Cost: $192 million over 10 years

Current law imposes a $13.50 per proof gallon excise tax on distilled spirits produced in or imported into the United States — of which $13.25 per proof gallon was made as a payment to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands until the end of 2007, after which it was lowered to $10.50 per proof gallon. This retroactively extends that provision from Dec. 31, 2007, through the end of 2009.

* American Samoa Economic Development Credit — Cost: $33 million over 10 years

Certain domestic corporations operating in American Samoa were eligible for a possessions tax credit, which offsets their U.S. tax liability on income earned in American Samoa from active business operations, sales of assets used in a business, or certain investments in American Samoa. The tax credit expired on Dec. 31, 2007. This retroactively restores it and extends it until the end of 2009.

* Extend and Expand 50% Tax Credit for Certain Expenditures for Maintaining Railroad Tracks — Cost: $331 million over ten years

Restores to certain railroads a tax credit equal to 50% of gross expenditures for maintaining railroad tracks that they own or lease.

* 7-Year Recovery Period for Certain Motorsports Racetrack Property — Cost: $100 million over 10 years

Extends a special 7-year cost recovery period or property used for land improvement and support facilities at motorsports entertainment complexes.

* The Wool Trust Fund — Cost: $148 million over ten years

Extends a provision that reduces import duties on a limited quantity of imported wool fabrics and places duties otherwise collected on the import of certain wool products into the Wool Trust Fund, which promotes the competitiveness of American wool.

* Special Expensing Rules for Certain Film and Television Productions — Cost: $81 million over 10 years

Under current law, a producer can elect to take a single-year deduction of up to $15 million in production costs incurred in the U.S. If the production costs are over $15 million, this deduction does not apply. The maximum deduction is increased to $20 million if the costs are significantly incurred in economically depressed areas. No other depreciation or amortization is allowed for a production for which this deduction is taken. The provision expires Dec. 31, 2008. The proposal would extend the provision to the end of 2009.

* Provisions Related to Film and Television Productions — Cost: $397 million over ten years

Under current law, many film and television show production companies are unable to take advantage of the domestic production deduction. The proposal allows more film and television show production companies to use the domestic production deduction, which will encourage more production of films and television productions.

* Excise Tax Exemption for Wooden Practice Arrows Used by Children — Cost: $2 million over 10 years

Current law imposes an excise tax of 39 cents, adjusted for inflation, on the first sale by the manufacturer, producer, or importer of any shaft of a type used to produce certain types of arrows. This proposal would exempt from the excise tax any shaft consisting of all natural wood with no laminations or artificial means to enhance the spine of the shaft used in the manufacture of an arrow that measures 5/16 of an inch or less and is unsuited for use with a bow with a peak draw weight of 30 pounds or more.

* Income Averaging for Exxon Valdez Litigation Amounts — Cost: $49 million over 10 years

Allowing commercial fishermen and other individuals whose livelihoods were negatively impacted by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to average any settlement or judgment-related income that they receive in connection with pending litigation in the federal courts over three years for federal tax purposes. The bill would also allow these individuals to use these funds to make contributions to retirement accounts.

The Senate Finance Committee issued a statement saying that these are not "’earmarks.’ According to the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, a tax earmark or limited tax benefit means any revenue provision that (A) provides a Federal tax deduction, credit, exclusion, or preference to a particular beneficiary or limited group of beneficiaries under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and (B) contains eligibility criteria that are not uniform in application with respect to potential beneficiaries of such provision."

- jpt

User Comments

“This proposal would exempt from the excise tax any shaft consisting of all natural wood with no laminations or artificial means to enhance the spine of the shaft used in the manufacture of an arrow that measures 5/16 of an inch or less and is unsuited for use with a bow with a peak draw weight of 30 pounds or more.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Nope,no signs of journalism here.

Posted by: The Two Jakes | October 2, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Cheaper Baccardi? Who can possibly be against that?
The railroad credit for maintaining tracks may be a good thing given details. We need those right of ways for a transition back to freight hauling on rail as well as improvements to reduce energy consumption. We have to make some bridging moves to close the energy gaps over the next decade.
Yes the bill is full of pork but some of it is bar-b-que and some of it is just pig meat.

Posted by: len | October 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

If this isn’t special interests at play I don’t know what is.

Posted by: In the dark | October 2, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I don’t think the dems need to pay off Hollywood. Still, this is all unbelievable!

Posted by: In the dark | October 2, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Also, this is clearly BOTH parties at work here. If you say the TV/Film was by the dems, then clearly the Motorsports Racetrack Property was by the GOP.
Both parties are at fault for this ridiculousness. I think everyone can agree that this system is broken!

Posted by: In the dark | October 2, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

I do believe it was the republican house members who couldn’t muster the original one. so are they sweetening up the deal for, them?

Posted by: make it known | October 2, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

You didn’t really think they were looking out for the taxpayers, did you? Everybody’s got their hands out, and the taxpayer will just pay, and pay, and pay.

Posted by: don | October 2, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I would love to know who wanted the “wooden arrow” excise tax exception in this bill. 2 million ..now that would pay for a lot of home heating fuel for our elderly this winter. Sad sad day for our country…Dems and Repubs.

Posted by: linda n carolina | October 2, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“I think everyone can agree that this system is broken!”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Is it any wonder that these “FOOLS” ON THE HILL” cant get things worked out? Things only get done if there is 10 tons of PORK hooked to anything that resemble a Bill that gets passed! We, the people, get the shaft!! Personally I hope the whole thing goes down the drain!! Lets all vote the BUMS out!! They ARE the problem!!

Posted by: commrat72 | October 2, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“The railroad credit for maintaining tracks may be a good thing given details. We need those right of ways for a transition back to freight hauling on rail as well as improvements to reduce energy consumption. We have to make some bridging moves to close the energy gaps over the next decade.
Yes the bill is full of pork but some of it is bar-b-que and some of it is just pig meat.”
Agreed. And I like that last line.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 2, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“that would pay for a lot of home heating fuel for our elderly this winter”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

How much more will the taxpayers take before they finally wake up? Where in this bill is there anything for the little guy? Show me! Where they raised the FDIC insurance? Please who has $100,000 sitting around in a bank anymore let lone $250,000.I’ll give them the AMP patch…HAH they needed a crisis bill to get us that. Where’s the relief on adjustable morgages? Credit card interest rates?

Posted by: linda n carolina | October 2, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

I guess I can rest assured, both my state senators voted “no”. However, I would be interested in know which senators needed to watch their movies while getting drunk on rum, as their kids practiced with the bow and arrows/

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 2, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

We, the people, get the shaft!!

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Belle Star: I know you and I come from complete opposite views …..but I think we both can agree that washington is broken and there is few who are looking out for the little guy. However Sen Barnes the Independent gave a great speech yesterday on the bill.

Posted by: linda n carolina | October 2, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Someone has to pay these taxes if they don’t and GUESS WHO gets the privilege? TA-DAAAA!!! It is the 95% who wont be taxed under the Obama plan or all of us under the McCain plan. Man, I aint the most brillent person in the world but if Stevie Wonder can see this, so can the rest of us FREE THINKERS!! How in Gods name do you “RESCUE” something when you drown it at the “SAME” time?

Posted by: commrat72 | October 2, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Why did these proposals have to be added to the Bailout Bill???
I see no reason for it except that the Republicans would not sign this bill unless they where added.
Isn’t these proposals the Tax Bill that the Dems keep turning down and wanted time to run out on so they can clean it up??? Is this that Tax bill??

Posted by: beck | October 2, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

“However Sen Barnes the Independent gave a great speech yesterday on the bill.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

“…consisting of all natural wood with no laminations or artificial means to enhance the spine”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

We have the most corrupt government in the WORLD!! At least third world governments parade their corruption openly…our government does it behind closed doors!!!

Posted by: CC | October 2, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Congress Has 43,457,362 Reasons to Help Goldman Sachs
Embattled Firm and Its Employees Spread Millions Around Washington in Donations and Lobbying Expenses —-
Before becoming Treasury Secretary, Paulson was chairman of Goldman Sachs, earning over $140 million in compensation during his seven years as the firm’s top officer, according to company filings. Upon taking office, Paulson divested himself of his 3.23 million Goldman shares, reportedly worth $485 million at the time, to comply with government ethics rules.
Goldman Sachs bankers are also the number one contributors to the Barack Obama presidential campaign, giving $691,930 to his campaign in this cycle, according to the records.
John McCain’s campaign has received substantially less from Goldman Sachs employees, $208,395, although they are, as a group, his fourth largest contributor.
In addition to campaign contributions, Goldman Sachs has spent $13.8 million on lobbying expenses since 1998, when Paulson became co-CEO.

Posted by: Maryland Woman | October 2, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Two reminders:
1. Both of the major candidates fully support this bailout.
2. There are more than two people running for president.
Strongly consider a third party this year, for the good of our country. Bob Barr, Ralph Nader, or even write in Ron Paul. No, they won’t win this year, but a strong showing gives them future potential. Vote Independent or Libertarian locally whenever possible, or expect the same results year after year.

Posted by: Jeremy | October 2, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Congress Has 43,457,362 Reasons to Help Goldman Sachs
Embattled Firm and Its Employees Spread Millions Around Washington in Donations and Lobbying Expenses —-
Before becoming Treasury Secretary, Paulson was chairman of Goldman Sachs, earning over $140 million in compensation during his seven years as the firm’s top officer, according to company filings. Upon taking office, Paulson divested himself of his 3.23 million Goldman shares, reportedly worth $485 million at the time, to comply with government ethics rules.
Goldman Sachs bankers are also the number one contributors to the Barack Obama presidential campaign, giving $691,930 to his campaign in this cycle, according to the records.
John McCain’s campaign has received substantially less from Goldman Sachs employees, $208,395, although they are, as a group, his fourth largest contributor.
In addition to campaign contributions, Goldman Sachs has spent $13.8 million on lobbying expenses since 1998, when Paulson became co-CEO.

Posted by: Maryland Woman | October 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

What a shame that the addition of this PORK was necessary in order to get the rescue package to pass the senate! The LOBBYISTS and their corrupt practices SHOULD BE OUTLAWED! These types of practices are a disgrace to the American people.

Posted by: jmb | October 2, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Jane Harmon and idiot Dem is asking for McCain to come and speak about the bail out. Makes you wonder why she is not asking for Obama to come speak about the bail out? What kind of idiots are you electing in California? Sure am glad I moved away. Harmon, Polosi wow what a line up. You say Palin is not quallified. at least she did not run to to the shiek and kiss his behind like Polosi did and then come back and bleam it on someone else. To much weed in her mouth I think.

Posted by: Jim Rod | October 2, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

If these are not ear marks, then the ear mark number they have been quoting of $18B is probably way understated vs what most folks viewed ear marks to be.
What are these called? Butt marks?
Sounds like there is an even bigger opportunity to cut waste then what we have been led to believe.

Posted by: StuDaBaka | October 2, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Vote for no encumbent. In two years vote for no encumbent. Let’s change the sheets on the bed they lie in.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | October 2, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Another example of the dmocrat spend, spend, spend addiction.

Posted by: Joaquin B. | October 2, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

McCain voted for this? Mr. No Earmarks? His chance to “walk the walk”? And neither candidate got their brain trusts together to come up with a better plan? This is the best that we could do?

Posted by: mmartin | October 2, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Why isn’t Ken Star investigating the current administration? Oh right they didn’t have a one night stand with an intern…they just killed thousands in this senseless war, ripped our entire economy apart, people are losing their jobs, their homes, gas and food prices sky high……..
This is unbelieveable! Spent millions investigating Clinton but this bunch of clowns put us into a Depression and no one is investigated.

Posted by: Barb | October 2, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Is there no way to find out who actually added the extra crap? Can’t they be called out?

Posted by: PJ | October 2, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

What may be overlooked is that many of these add on”s are already on the books and are just being extended. These are not new items but extensions of existing. You are already paying for these issues.
If this rescue bill does not pass the impact to you and me could be devastating. If business can’t get loans for their companies then people get let go. Your 401K will take years to recoup if it can be recouped. Most people do not have a clue how this will affect main street but it will destroy your way of life if it does not pass.
Don’t think this will affect you think again. No loans for cars, houses, farms, students, business, new construction and so on.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Linda,
Belle Star: I know you and I come from complete opposite views …..but I think we both can agree that washington is broken and there is few who are looking out for the little guy.- However Sen Barnes the Independent gave a great speech yesterday on the bill.
Posted by: linda n carolina | Oct 2, 2008 1:02:44 PM
________________________________________
Linda, here is your chance to look out for the “little guy”. Vote ALL these bums out of office. We have gone through this kind of bs long enough. What we need is TERM LIMITS. Stop electing sons and daughters of the congressmen and get folks that are living the things we out here talk about. The ones there now don’t have a clue. When they aren’t reelected, a job as lobyist should not be allowed.

Posted by: MEW | October 2, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Just shameless. And at least I am honest and realistic. I am a Democrat and voting for Obama, but get real. Everybody had a hand in this. Bushie, McSame, everybody with their name on this bill. I make no excuses, and blame them all. I hope it flunks the House again, and if I was you, like I am, am going to call my Representative’s office and tell him just how pissed off I really am. This is ridiculous!!

Posted by: SD | October 2, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

And I agree why can’t they find who added on all this crap and why?

Posted by: Barb | October 2, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I ams very relieved that the hollywood film makers are taken care of, this just worried me to death when I was witing my check for kid’s college loan payment. Where is Ross Perot?

Posted by: jamescbuilder | October 2, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Yes SD I am also a Democrat and voting for Obama but you are so right. I’m furious too….
We really should have them all impeached! Still cannot understand how a HUGE surplus can become a HUGE deficit in eight years.
War, and letting all this nonsense go on with Wall Street and the banks and no one watching or no one caring.
And the economy was structurally sound two weeks ago ie BUSH and MCCAIN

Posted by: barb | October 2, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I just heard from my friend that a chinese newspaper says that “AMERICA IS A CAPITALIST COUNTRY WITHOUT CAPITAL”.
Sadly, it may be so. Thanks to our corrupt politicians who wantonly make us believe that WALL STREET Economy is REAL ECONOMY, we have LOST MILLIONS OF JOBS, WE HAVE NOT CREATED ANY NEW INFRASTRUCTURE and OUR GDP is tanking.
These are the real indicators of REAL ECONOMY. This “SWEETENED” COW PATTY will have no real effect on the REAL ECONOMY and REAL WEALTH of the ECONOMY.
SHAME on McCAin and OBAMA. They are both on the side of WASHINGTON and WALL STREET and not on AMERICAN PEOPLE’S side.

Posted by: HonestAmerican67 | October 2, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

You forgot to mention the repeal of accounting rules that were put into place after the Enron scandal.

Posted by: Arlette | October 2, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I’m torn between crying and vomiting.
-I am with a few of you, give us the names of the senators putting this crap in there.
-Seriously, how does one start a taxpayer revolt? I’m not kidding…

Posted by: mmartin | October 2, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

StuDaBaka
Technically not all pork is earmarks. Earmarks are usually pork, but the additional problem with earmarks is the way they can slip them in at the last minute without representatives being able to even read them before the vote.
Pork is one issue, but at least it is usually involves open votes. Earmarks are fundamentally un-democratic.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I do blame the current administration. Eight YEARS.. Come on, if others were to blame why didn’t they see it and correct it? They are in charge!

Posted by: Barbara | October 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

What may be overlooked is that many of these add on”s are already on the books and are just being extended. These are not new items but extensions of existing. You are already paying for these issues.
What may be overlooked is that many of these add on”s are already on the books and are just being extended. These are not new items but extensions of existing. You are already paying for these issues.
If this rescue bill does not pass the impact to you and me could be devastating. If business can’t get loans for their companies then people get let go. Your 401K will take years to recoup if it can be recouped. Most people do not have a clue how this will affect main street but it will destroy your way of life if it does not pass.
Don’t think this will affect you think again. No loans for cars, houses, farms, students, business, new construction and so on.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Not earmarks My A–. They most cetainly are earmarks. They really have they’re nerve. If this isn’t voted NO, God will let this country go to H–!

Posted by: Julie | October 2, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Not earmarks My A–. They most certainly are earmarks. They really have they’re nerve. If this isn’t voted NO, God will let this country go to H–!

Posted by: Julie | October 2, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

This is treason against the people of the United States of America. If Congress, The Senate and The Administration keep this up, there will be no alternative for the people, but to take action. Our forefathers would be appalled. Let the banks fail, credit be dammed. The system needs to correct itself.

Posted by: DaveD | October 2, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Can you find out who added these to the bill, Jake?

Posted by: K | October 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

The bailout plan talks about saving 401K’s. Who can afford to put money into them. We barely make ends meet. Working till we die…

Posted by: arlette | October 2, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

You have got to be kidding me!!!?? This is insane and it just keeps getting worse. In a time where people are lossing their homes their jobs and their hope, we have our “leaders” putting together a 800 billion bailout plan that includes toys and race tracks!!!?????? I am just sick!

Posted by: Tiffiny Pandazedes | October 2, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

DaveD: Correct. I did not serve my country for 25 years to see it fall to the greed and tyranny of the rich. This bill must be stopped dead. Call your Congressman NOW!

Posted by: CDR USN (RET) | October 2, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

All I need is $50,000 for the next 10 years and i can put a dent in the feral hog population in West Texas. That is a measly 500M that could beadded to you bill!!!

Posted by: Robert cullins | October 2, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

I’m starting to think that NOT having experience in washington is actually a strength and not a weakness.

Posted by: StuDaBaka | October 2, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

I am very worried about our legislators not listening to us. There is no guarantee that purchasing these toxic assets will help in any way. Over 150 of the nations top economists are telling Congress no to the bailout. And in the process the Senate adds a bunch of new tax earmarks for things such as wooden arrows. We’ve already given billions to AIG, Fannie/Freddie, etc. and the problems are still there. I’m afraid this could be be $700 billion down the tubes.
For 2 weeks we’ve been told daily if we don’t do something today, financial armageddon will arrive tomorrow. Every day we get by though and the stock market isn’t plummeting 2,000 points as many have suggested. We all need to realize the number is on paper anyway, eventually the DOW will be back up. In addition, my neighbor just obtained a $150,000 credit line showing credit isn’t as bad as we are led to believe.
We are in a financial mess, and things need to be done. However, we must be smart in how we attack this. During times of war or when playing chess you think strategicly to win the war/game. It isn’t about moving as fast as possible to win a battle. You could make a wrong move which could lead to defeat. We could make things worse and be forced to do this all over again in 5-10 years.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

And this gives new meaning to
“Send in the Clowns”

Posted by: Barbara | October 2, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Justifying these add on’s by saying that “they were already in the books and we are already paying for them” is UNBELIEVABLE. I am a McCain supporter, but am very disappointed. When it comes to our economy, BOTH candidates will be “more of the same”. Who the heck can we turn to????

Posted by: Art Texas | October 2, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Barbara, didn’t you hear Maxine Waters
blabbering that there was no problem with Fannie and Freddie? Most democrats didn’t think there was a problem, so all the blame cannot be put on George Bush. How is Obama going to pay for the things he wants when he is president; thought we have no money? The people in Washington cannot correct the problems that they have made and as long as we let the lobyists control our government; nothing is going to change.
—————————————
I do blame the current administration. Eight YEARS.. Come on, if others were to blame why didn’t they see it and correct it? They are in charge!
Posted by: Barbara | Oct 2, 2008 1:55:29 PM
—————————————-

Posted by: MEW | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Not that I’m saying to pass or not pass – but the first bailout bill was 3 pages the new one exceeds 400 pages. I personally think the money spent to get to this point could have been put to better use.

Posted by: AttitudeOfGratitude | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

So we can’t get loans. Is that really so bad. I know it will put a pinch on the economy, but the reality is that American’s have been over spending for years. Salaries don’t keep up with the costs of living, something has to break eventually. This doesn’t fix the issue, it just shores it up for later generations to feel the pain.

Posted by: kerri | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

The new media is about as crooked as our elected scum bags!

Posted by: AM | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

This “dole-out” bill could be compared to the parents of an alcoholic (Congress) giving their addicted child (Wall St.) a keg, a tap and the keys to a new car (the object(s) of their abuse) using money they raised at the police station fund-raiser (our tax money) and then attempting to bribe us (the police) with gifts (incentives to the bill) so that we’ll look the other way…

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | October 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

It’s not unusal for Congress to drop adders to these bills, but for this one huge controversial, any adder needs to be something that would benefit regular Americans, specifically for the economy, as the main component of the bill was intended. Not all this extra pork. It would make even a elementary kid suspicious the way this second revision is going.
If Americans are generally against it, and they had to sweetened it, they should have at least tried to sweetened it, not load it full of pork.

Posted by: Quincy Brown | October 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

That is news media

Posted by: AM | October 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Do all of our Senators have ADD? Can’t they focus on solving the problem at hand? Their only solution to any/every problem is to throw more money at it, at the taxpayers’ expense. They’re mortgaging our future and that of our children/grandchildren. If this plan needs all of these “sweeteners” in it in order to obtain the required number of votes, then it is very likely not a good plan in the first place. I would like to know the names of the Senators who had the integrity to oppose this bill — Republican or Democrat, they are to be heralded. The rest should be asked to pin their pensions on their claims that this $800B will eventually be paid back. It should simply be illegal/unconstitutional to add any unrelated provisions to a bill. I understand the apprehension of giving the President the power of the line-item veto, but when you hear of bills like this, you can certainly see how it would be advantageous if used judiciously.

Posted by: prm | October 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Why not give the bailout money to the american people? For Example: The 85 billion we paid for AIG to stay solvent.
If you gave that to say every american citizen over the age of 18 ( roughly
200 million people) that would come to 425000.00 dollars. Now it’s not free so we pay 30% tax leaving each person 297000.00 dollars. Do you thing people would then pay their mortages? Spend some money on goods and services? Put money in the stock market? And this is
only costing the government 59.5 billion
dollars since 24.5 billion goes right back as taxes. This makes more sense to me than just bailing out one company.

Posted by: COMMON SENSE MAN | October 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

vakcmo, I don’t think most folks are overlooking the points you made. It’s just that this bill isn’t acceptable. And I don’t care if we’re already paying for this. If our financial system is in such bad shape, we need to cut….and it appears a lot of this junk can go! I know it happens all the time but it should stop. Our politicians are supposed to be public servants and they’re not doing their jobs. It took more effort to add the junk than it did to leave it out. I’m an Obama supporter but I think both Obama and McCain should have rejected this bill. Maybe I don’t understand politics enough and maybe there’s more to this than I understand, but I really believe the contents, and all the politicians that add items to a bill, should be considered public record. That way, citizens can hold them accountable….or maybe it is public record….anybody know whether or not it is?

Posted by: PJ | October 2, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I do not know why everyone is blaming Bush for this mess without holding everyone responsible. If you are not afraid of the truth please look at your representatives records and you will be sadly surprised. Not only look at their records but also look at who supported them and why. Too many of our representatives are more concerned about their people they perceive to be important instead of being concerned about us. There is already a witch hunt on against the republicans lets light a fire and start on the democrats and maybe just maybe we can all learn the truth about both parties. And no i am not a libertarian just a citizen who wants to really know what is the truth without spin.

Posted by: Pat | October 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Is this why we sent them to Washington to bend us over.
Lets vote these greedy trolls out!

Posted by: Melissa | October 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

I agree with Common Sense Man. Give us the money and we pay off our own debt and still have money.

Posted by: kerri | October 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“Vote ALL these bums out of office.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I have seen hundreds of blogs filled with 90 % percent against the bailout ..and if it passes in the house …….I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR EVERYONE …HOW MANY OF YOU WILL STAND UP AND DO SOMETHING OR GO BACK TO WATCHING DANCING WITH FOOLS AND YOUR SUNDAY FOOTBALL…WHAT WILL TELL YOUR CHILDREN WHEN THEY ASK YOU WHAT U DID TO STOP THIS MADNESS?

Posted by: DJ PLATNUM | October 2, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

To think that anyone would take the time and effort to tack on these earmarks is freaking ridiculous. Give us the names of these Senators so we can mock them out loud. Thank you.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | October 2, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Pelosi “looked under a rock and saw vermin” ?…. she LIVES under that rock….

Posted by: Homonauseous | October 2, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

The taxpayers have finally woke up! This crap has been going on for years but we were all too busy working for a living to notice. Now we all need to learn to keep more pro-active. When this crisis blows over (and it will), we don’t go back to politics as usual.

Posted by: woeisus | October 2, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I propose giving every American citizen the $2200 it cost us directly. The bailout should demand that the CEO’s that received severance packages over $1 million pay that stuff back directly.
Or even better, serve in Iraquntil the job is done!!!

Posted by: TomJ | October 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

I’m starting to think that NOT having experience in washington is actually a strength and not a weakness.
Posted by: StuDaBaka | Oct 2, 2008 2:02:29 PM
—————————————-
StuDaBaka,
You might be on to something. Only thing is, I remember voting for Ross Perot…I don’t want to waste my vote again.

Posted by: Star Struck | October 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

There is a way to find out who is behind each of these laws for their pork barrel spending. Such is public policy and available to the public. Contact your reference desk at your local library to direct you to avoid getting the run around by state reps. who might have ties with someone

Posted by: PLAKPDER | October 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

This “dole-out” bill could be compared to the parents of an alcoholic (Congress) giving their addicted child (Wall St.) a keg, a tap and the keys to a new car (the object(s) of their abuse) using money they raised at the police station fund-raiser (our tax money) and then attempting to bribe us (the police) with gifts (incentives to the bill) so that we’ll look the other way…

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | October 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Um, Common Sense Man, your math it WAAAAY off. If you give $425,000 to 200 million people, you’d need 85 TRILLION dollars, not 85 billion.

Posted by: Lee | October 2, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

I heard a discussion about this on TV yesterday. Whoever was speaking said that these add-ons were very common in DC and that that’s the way you get things done. I wonder when doing the right thing for the right reason was enough?

Posted by: Lynn | October 2, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

PRM, Good idea but bad math, 85B/200M=$425. still 700B/200M=$3500. That’s several to a couple mortgage payments for most.
Better yet lower existing interest rates to 3% for 5 years and see if things begin to straighten out in a few months. A fund setup for lenders to access with tough requirements to borrow at 2% can help support this. No foreign movement of money from the fund, no big windfalls to executives.

Posted by: MD | October 2, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Make no mistake. Every Single Politician republician or democrat who voted
for the bailout, most likely just voted away their jobs! I hope it was worth
it to them!! They have betrayed the american people in the highest sense by
passing this very corrupt bill. John Mccain lost my vote as soon as he opened
his mouth and said “Lets not call it a BAILOUT” … lets call it a “RESCUE”.
Like the Hard working American People are STUPID and DONT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE.
The whole thing is sad and very dissapointing but alas election day is coming!

Posted by: Glamourgurl77 | October 2, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

And I thought I was bad with money!

Posted by: jimwings | October 2, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

StarStruck – I too voted for Perot (didn’t think it was a wasted vote though)…and am seriously thinking about writing in Ron Paul (still have a bolt up my bum about Nader and 2000).
Of course by the time we cast our vote, this will be signed and we will be screwed.
With all of the talk of earmarks/wasteful spending/politics as usual, how could BOTH of the candidates vote yes? VOTE NO, you have he news cameras all of the time…appeal to the people to calm down and wait for a good solution to be worked out WITH NO FREAKING PORK!
I am sooo mad right now that I’m thinking of selling everything (ha, who can afford to buy) and starting a revolution in the hills of PA. Anybody want to join?

Posted by: mmartin | October 2, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Commrat: If things continue on as is there won’t be any work for the illegals also.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“Contact your reference desk at your local library to direct you to avoid getting the run around by state reps. who might have ties with someone”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

FIRE THEM ALL!!! NO SEVERANCE PAY WHATSOEVER. LET US START ALL OVER!!!

Posted by: lgee | October 2, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

I would like to see each of these corrupt individuals exposed or outted so that we kicked them out of office. This is just sickening…U.S. Govt. is no different then other corrupt leaders around the world. Therefore, we need to cut the “BS” with creating so-called policies around the world and sticking our noses into other nations business. We can’t be hypocrital. We need to resolve problems at home first to become true leaders. I’m sure we have been exposed in such a negative way that other nations and their leaders will forever thumb their noses at us. Who are we kidding? Rather than help the poor and middle class, certain elected leaders complain but they will gladly throw money into foolish spending such as $2Million for wooden arrows, fixing Exxon’s liability at tax-payers expense, wool research… This money could serve the homeless, struggling middle-class working families. Ooops Corrupt spending would never allow for moral and responsible spending. Get these corrupt leaders out of office. They only care about themselves, their constituents…they are not for the people of America. We need to take back their power! ASAP. Let’s do our research, track down and expose these “Corrupted Authors” of such pork-barrel spending.

Posted by: PLAKPDER | October 2, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

VAKCMO; Will they go the ___ home or drain our already depleted system somemore?

Posted by: commrat72 | October 2, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

If you vote for any candidate other than a dem or rep you just might put the dem or rep in to office that you did not want.
A vote for McCain is a VOTE AGAINST THE MEDIA. DON’T LET THE MEDIA WIN….they have worked so hard TO SELL THEIR PRODUCT; let them know how hard it is to work and then get kicked in the teeth.

Posted by: s | October 2, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

PJ:The junk in the bill is the compromise for both parties to vote for it. Each group gets their little pet taken care of. Unfortunately this is how politics works. I am not saying Im for it but if we don’t do something much worse things will happen

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

From the 9.21.2008 “60 Minutes interview with John McCain…..
6o MIN comment: After the surge was announced with more than 60% of Americans against the proposal…
McCain: I believe we can succeed and consequences of failure, catastrophic”
Scott Pelley, 60 MIN: “I wonder at what point do you stop doing what you think is right and start doing what the majority of the American people want?”
McCain: “WELL ONCE AGAIN I DISAGREE WITH WHAT THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT.”
Me: i.e. The majority doesn’t matter anymore. The voters don’t matter. The current congress seems to mirror this attitude. They take the most important economic legislation since 1929 and gum it up with “bridge to nowhere” pork.
I say lets vote for anyone who is not an incumbent. Clean house and get new faces in D.C.
By the way, anyone know how to find out which senators added which provisions?

Posted by: Arby | October 2, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Vote for no encumbent. In two years vote for no encumbent. Let’s change the sheets on the bed they lie in.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | October 2, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Common Sense Man, please recheck your math. The answer is actually $425/per person; a long way from what you posted.
Additionally, there is an awful lot of partisan finger pointing going on. I’m sure there is plenty of blame to assigned to each political party.
What I would like to see is a non-partisan chronological listing of events and who was involved at each step that got us to this point. No one wants to hear that “their” party had anything to do with it but until the true facts are exposed, no one is going to change their position. Knowing who of our elected officials (probably most of them) were centrally involved might open the eyes of the electorate and help to make better decisions when those Congressmen come up for re-election.
Speaking of which, how about term limits for the Senate and the House. Why should this be a job for life. Tack on that after their terms have expired, that they would not be allowed to be DC lobbyists.

Posted by: An Average Guy | October 2, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

I HOPE AND PRAY OBAMA WINS.GLAD HE DIDN’T FALL FOR THE TRAP BEFORE HIS DEBATE.

Posted by: zorra | October 2, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Commrat: They will all be gone and you will still be out of work.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Email the ladies of “The View” they will get down to business and tell us what we need to hear. Barbara, Joy, Whoopi,(et.al). Please tell us who the heck included non-sense spending of American tax-payers dollars…”We love watching your show as you tell it like it is…especially Whoopi and Joy!” I can’t wait until this is open for discussion on your show. You are “Real people with real connections”…If your reading this, give us know the 411 Ladies!! Thanks.

Posted by: plakder | October 2, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

You cannot get out of debt by borrowing money. You cannot improve someone’s life by shackling them. You cannot solve a financial crisis by spending. We have two major groups in government, one that taxes and spends and another that borrows and spends. See the problem?
There is only one thing that they can agree on – spending. And they do it with reckless abandon. Before you blame the party you don’t belong to, back up and consider the approach your party has taken. The two major parties are both destructive to this nation and its people.
They do not care about you. They have fooled you into voting for them without regard for your needs or concerns. Don’t be fooled again by the recent house vote. If they ever do what you want it is so they can get what they want – your money and power over you.
It’s time for Americans to tear up their ridiculous party affiliations and tear down the arrogant and selfish leaders that are driving us to destruction. We need to start voting for people instead of parties. We need strong independent candidates with a kick butt, take no crap attitude and a firm determination to spend less and work more.
You may think your neighbor who belongs to the other party is your enemy – he isn’t. It’s the bozos you both are voting for that are going to ruin you and this nation. This article illustrates that very clearly.
You’re all rightfully infuriated by the irresponsibility of this bill and you’re looking to attack the other party because you think that will help your party even though your party is just as much to blame. And your argument may actually help your party. But it won’t help you or your neighbor. The only way to fix this is for the little guys to stop allowing our leaders to pit us against each other and rise up against our true enemy.

Posted by: Duks | October 2, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Glamourgurl77:
John Mccain lost my vote as soon as he opened
his mouth and said “Lets not call it a BAILOUT” … lets call it a “RESCUE”.
Like the Hard working American People are STUPID and DONT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE.
The whole thing is sad and very dissapointing but alas election day is coming!
Posted by: Glamourgurl77 | Oct 2, 2008 2:23:15 PM
————————————–
Glamourgurl77: You will be hollowing “RESCUE” if you elect Obama. Can’t see why you guys can’t see through him; he is a transparent as a window pane. Your glamourgurl status might be short lived. We think this bill is “pork” when we have him it will be the whole barnyard.

Posted by: s | October 2, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Barney Frank said it perfectly this morning, though not in these exact words: The additions, like the new FDIC max of $250K, allows the weak-willed, blowin-with-the-wind congressmen who voted against the bail out to now vote for the “improved” bill and save face. It’s still the same bail out they voted against, its just the public mood that’s shifted thanks to all the terrorizing comments by every talking head in government and the media.

Posted by: Steve | October 2, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Why are we paying $2,000,000 for wooden arrows, for children???

Posted by: pt | October 2, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

It isn’t too late for your voice to be heard. Contact every Congressmen you can before it is too late.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

I don’t think the dems need to pay off Hollywood. Still, this is all unbelievable!
You don’t?
You want to know the truth? Always follow the money trail. Those Hollywood tax cuts go right back to the Dems. BOTH parties are responsible for this!!
What really PISSES me off is we put them in office.

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Who’s at fault?
Stop the finger pointing!! Basically, only a small percentage of banks are required to issue sub-prime loans (see Community Recovery Act). All the other banks saw a way to make huge cash on a booming housing market. Everyone forgets that banks DON’T HAVE TO GIVE LOANS (trust me, I know). If you’re going to point fingers, it all goes back to the banks themselves giving loans to people they shouldn’t have given them to.

Posted by: Nate | October 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Why are we paying $2,000,000 for wooden arrows, for children???
Because someone is going to make $650,000.00 off of it.

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

While some are rather obvious – I want to know WHO these everyone of these pork belly – legislative earmarks were proposed by – and who benefits. Why? So, we the people can begin to RECALL the legislators who proposed to spend our federal tax dollars for the wealthy few, . . . the imoral blood sucking liars.

Posted by: Taxpayer | October 2, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Who’s at fault?
Stop the finger pointing!! Basically, only a small percentage of banks are required to issue sub-prime loans (see Community Recovery Act). All the other banks saw a way to make huge cash on a booming housing market. Everyone forgets that banks DON’T HAVE TO GIVE LOANS (trust me, I know). If you’re going to point fingers, it all goes back to the banks themselves giving loans to people they shouldn’t have given them to.
You are right, so why do WE the TAXPAYERS have to bail these banks out? They were greedy, they gambled when they gave these loans and guess what? THEY LOST!!

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Tired of Pork:
I totally agree with you. The problem is that if banks can’t lend money, our economy shuts down. It’s crazy that a business can do whatever it wants and it will always be “saved” when it screws up because it is so vital to our economic existence. Regulation and rules anyone?

Posted by: Nate | October 2, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

“Why are we paying $2,000,000 for wooden arrows, for children???
Because someone is going to make $650,000.00 off of it.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

“Why are we paying $2,000,000 for wooden arrows, for children???”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

where all in vegas and dont know it…..

Posted by: DJ PLATNUM | October 2, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I know Arby, but it’s just a hard pill for me to swallow. I hope Obama wins and can start the change in government he talks about. He’s right….we really need to become more involved in the political process.

Posted by: PJ | October 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Nate: that’s not true. A bank is simply an intermediere between those who have money to lend and those who want to borrow. In this day and age that sort of middle man isn’t necessarily needed.
We have the technology to find each other and broker our own deals in a TRUE free capital market. People are doing it already. Do a google on “Peer to peer lending”

Posted by: Don | October 2, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“Everyone forgets that banks DON’T HAVE TO GIVE LOANS (trust me, I know).”
You miss one point. Obama worked as a lawyer forcing banks to give out subprime loans to unqualified recipients. So he and those like him in his profession were very much part of the problem.

Posted by: len | October 2, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Can’t anybody do anything without getting paid off anymore? I have been hearing a lot of fire em all in the blogs lately. I am thinking about writing in Some people, People I know are honest. Oh but wait we can’t it is all electronic in the voting booths now with NO PAPER TRAIL. How can America believe anything from anybody DEM OR REPUBLICAN. Maybe they can get us to pay for taxes on the race tracks too and all the movie stars homes. Am I the only one who likes to get Kissed when I get ######!

Posted by: Rose MacAskie | October 2, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

To date, nearly 1 Trillion dollars on bailing out AIG, Fannie/Freddie, Bear Stearns, WAMU, and other Institutions. Did this improve in the economy? These bailout only accelerated the economic downturn. Now Congress wants to fix the economy by throwing a $850 billion SELLOUT BILL at the problem, but it will only accelerate the CRASH and compound the SEVERITY of the MELTDOWN.
And to claim it will reduce taxes. I guess in a way it will because if you have no job or home you can’t pay taxes. THANKS FOR THE MEMORIES (NIGHTMARES) CONGRESS AND THE CHENEY/BUSH ADMINISTRATION.

Posted by: TheEd | October 2, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

It’s business as usual. Why do we need to bail out the financial industry? They, along with the rest of the big business exec’s, CEO’s etc got greedy. There is no long term thinking, only how much can I make it look like the company made this quarter. (so their stock value will go up) With the campaigns of ALL politicians being primarialy funded by these people, and the only ones having real access to congressmen, (or women), being the lobbiest,who are pushing for whatever benifets the big businesses, it’s no wonder the average Joe is taking it in the shorts. KICK THEM ALL OUT! Have you ever wondered why any of them would take a job that pays so little, (with respect to the millions they are worth). They are all crooked, Demacrats and Republicans alike. We need people in congress that are looking out for the majority, not the special intrests and big corperations.

Posted by: fishbait | October 2, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

This mess started wiyh Bill Clinton when he deregulated the finance industry and pushed for CRA which created Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This bill is a slap to American tax payers. Obama and McCain didn’t have the ***** to stand up for the people. Both candidates gave in to Wall Street.

Posted by: quilhot | October 2, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“Justin Industries owned ACME until 2000 when Justin merged with BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY…chairman of berk hathaway? WARREN BUFFETT hmmm… where have i heard that name before?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Now is has been revealed. Now we know why the Iraq was is such a disaster. All along we have lead to believe that our soldiers were properly equipped, only to find out now that all this time they have been equipped with WOODEN ARROWS while our “allies” like Georgia gets state of art automatic weapons, tanks, and fighter jets. Wooden Arrows just what the Banks and Wall Street needed to shoot down the financial meltdown. Wooden Arrows, while people cannot pay for health care, they now can shoot the bill down. Wooden Arrows to help the plight of those left homeless so they can shoot the banks foreclosing on them. Wooden Arrows, to shoot the gas pumps and their rising prices. Wooden Arrows, to shoot down food prices. Wooden Arrows, that’s what this country really needed, not all this talk about bailing out Wall Street. Let’s forget about Wall Street and instead make the whole 700 Billion for Wooden Arrows. Are these real people in Washington or a bunch of clowns and comedians impersonating government?

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Does anyone know if banks only service loans and the money actually comes from Freddie or Fannie? Didn’t Obama take kickbacks from either Freddie or Fannie, or maybe both?

Posted by: Naive | October 2, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

They are calling this a rescue but are adding so much stuff to it. This is ridiculous. They need to sit down with economists and other great leaders to figure out a real, long-lasting solution. We’ve already given billions to AIG, Fannie/Freddie, etc. and the problems are still there. This will be $700 billion down the tubes.
Call or email your Congress member and tell them to vote NO!

Posted by: Alan | October 2, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Where is the “pork” portion of this “rescue package” to the people who typed this bill?

Posted by: Marvin | October 2, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Now we know what Obama is going to allow us to have to protect ourselves; after he takes our guns; wooden arrows.

Posted by: MEW | October 2, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Are these real people in Washington or a bunch of clowns and comedians impersonating government?
____
No jake they are blood sucking ticks that are serving their on self-intrests.

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

This is NOT rescue.
This is BAIL OUT.
Stop calling it a rescue bill.

Posted by: James | October 2, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

And…. WE elected them! Well, not exactly. The Electoral College elects them because we aren’t smart enough to have our votes count. Where is the Electoral College anyway? New Jersey? California? They think we are all stupid. Once the Electoral College is burned to the ground we will get a chance to have or vote counted. NOT until!

Posted by: ElectoralCollege | October 2, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Why did less than half of the DEMs vote for the first bailout bill? Why did more than half of the entire House, reject the first bailout bill? Maybe they are actually listening to their constituents. We can only hope that they won’t be sucked into signing onto “rescue #2″. To listen to the posters here and elsewhere on the web, we should have a regular legion of taxpayers that are actually going to vote the losers out that vote for this insanity. What a breath of fresh air the House will have then. The Senate would only have 25 of the ‘old timers” that voted against it, and a lot of new blood would be there next election cycle,as well. Hopefully Ya’ll are not just talk……God Bless America & God Bless our Troops!

Posted by: Born in America | October 2, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I am in favor of this provison:
Income Averaging for Exxon Valdez Litigation Amounts — Cost: $49 million over 10 years
Allowing commercial fishermen and other individuals whose livelihoods were negatively impacted by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill to average any settlement or judgment-related income that they receive in connection with pending litigation in the federal courts over three years for federal tax purposes. The bill would also allow these individuals to use these funds to make contributions to retirement accounts.
The Senate Finance Committee issued a statement saying that these are not “‘earmarks.’ According to the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, a tax earmark or limited tax benefit ‘means any revenue provision that (A) provides a Federal tax deduction, credit, exclusion, or preference to a particular beneficiary or limited group of beneficiaries under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and (B) contains eligibility criteria that are not uniform in application with respect to potential beneficiaries of such provision.”
and the one I saw on another thread which was extended benefits for the mentally ill (americans) which is an injustice in the health insurance coverage for about 20 years. but the rest we should just vote no on.
We need to pump money into our own economy we don’t need to fix other nations’ balance sheets.

Posted by: HBT-WI | October 2, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

It isn’t too late. Let your voice be heard!
Call or email your Congress member now.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Why did the McCain campaign pay for Cindy’s personal trip to Asia?

Posted by: Paige | October 2, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Ok, I don’t think that some people get it. I have excellent credit and my debt ratio is very low. Other than my home mortgage and a car payment I don’t owe anything else to the banks, but this past weekend, my car finally gave up, so I headed to the dealer to buy a small eco box. Nothing fancy, just a commuter. Well the finance officer approached me and told me that I was being rejected for a loan. I was shocked considering that I was plunking down over 20 percent. His excuse was that banks are not lending and in spite of the fact that I had excellent credit they declined my application. Finally the general manager came out and explained to me that sales were down over 50 percent do to the credit crunch. Banks are not offering consumer loans. So many auto dealers letting people go do to the lack of sales. Small and medium size corporations cannot borrow money to cover their payroll or upgrade their infrastructure. I the northern Virginia area, the office vacancy rate is high and unemployment is at it’s highest since the early 80’s. Some may say that unemployment is high all over, but the northern Virginia area was considered to be recession proof. People, we are in trouble, and I understand that the bailout stinks, but we need to get the credit markets back up and running or we are doomed. Millions of Americans will loose their jobs and our economic future will look dimmer. If these people cannot pay their debts, our banks will suffer deeper looses, and millions of Americans will lose their savings and jobs. As these people loose their jobs, our tax base will shrink, and the federal government will not be able to guarantee our life saving. The entire nation needs to unite and demand that the root cause of this mess be addressed. If we stay divided, and continue to point fingers, the future consists of milk and bread lines for millions of us, and only if our government can afford it. Worse yet, we could sell our soles to the Chinese and Russians.

Posted by: Derrek | October 2, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

This is why no one in America trusts anyone in Washington. What a bunch of crap this is. We are supposed to be passing a bill to help the economy and then the senate puts all this crap in that has no business being in this bill. I hate the way our government does business. I could randomly pick 10 people in my neighborhood who could do a better job that any of these losers in Washington could ever dream of doing.

Posted by: a nobody | October 2, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

WHO is going to make the money?
___
The information is out there;just google it.
AcmeWood Products is one of 3 companies that make that particular wood shaft.Acme was owned by Justin Industries. Justin Industries merged with Berkshire Hathaway in June 2000. Chairman of Berk Hath? Warren Buffett. hmmm…where have we heard that name before?
FOLLOW THE MONEY AND YOU WILL FIND THE TRUTH!

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“Hey someone removed my post about ACME and Warren Buffett!”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“S” this persons comment is the only one that rings some type of truth. Most people don’t get what is truely going on here! READ s comment!

Posted by: Scott | October 2, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

What a crock of –! Why don’t we start with looking at the salary of some of these people on Wall Street? Just their annual bonuses are more than I will ever make in my lifetime. Can we lower their salaries to start paying for this BAILOUT!

Posted by: Ripped off | October 2, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Money for the summer stimulus package was borrowed from China. What is the total bill? Principal + intrest? Now, $700B, will this money come from China also? Just think $700B x Interest x how many years to pay it back … who stands to gain the most?

Posted by: ethel5251 | October 2, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Quilhot,
Nothing Bill Clinton did could possibly have created Fanie Mae or Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae was formed in the late ’30′s when FDR was president. Freddie Mac was formed in 1970 under Nixon. The deregulation that allowed mortgages to be sold as securities, which is what is at the root of this current debacle, occured in the early 80′s under Reagan.

Posted by: WindyCity | October 2, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I and my co-workers had a liquid lunch, but I am still sober enough to remember this is the true scenario:
You cannot get out of debt by borrowing money. You cannot improve someone’s life by shackling them. You cannot solve a financial crisis by spending. We have two major groups in government, one that taxes and spends and another that borrows and spends. See the problem?
I kept thinking recently “can we vote none of the above?”. But telling myself if I do that I cancel out my vote. There are republicans, democrats, and independents that have it right. We need to choose the best [person] for the job.

Posted by: HBT-WI | October 2, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

After all the outrage over pork barrel spending, it takes a lot of gall to do this again.

Posted by: People are Dumb | October 2, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

The only business in town that buys worthless junk. I mean, even the dumbest businessman knows when something is worthless junk. I was just thinking…I have some junk in my garage they might be interested in. Yeah, it’s junk, but worth a lot of money. Tell you what Mr. Government, I’ll let you have the whole thing for…5 Million. Yeah, I’m reasonable, don’t want to rip off my government. What’s that you say…You’ll give 10 Million for it? That’s great, we got a deal, when do I get paid?

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

“So many auto dealers letting people go do to the lack of sales.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

All that business about “shafts’ suggests just one thing to me: the American taxpayer is getting the shaft!

Posted by: LW | October 2, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Contact your Congressmen now. Don’t let this pass. There are better alternatives than throwing $700 billion down the toilet.

Posted by: Andrew | October 2, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Alan, according to a bank officer that was on the line with one of Rush’s callers, most loans are, indeed, sold off to FM/FM. The bank officer referred to herself as a “server.”

Posted by: Deb Sturm | October 2, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

I have an idea about how to fix the corruption in government from the federal level all the way down to the city level.
How about every term, to be eligible for re-election you must have had a 75% approval rating from your district. AND if you score under 50% you forfeit any and all pay AND benefits you received during your term. The approval rating would be done via a simple vote, Yes – Good job, or No – Bad job.
If we hit them in THEIR wallets, maybe they will start paying attention to what they are doing to OURS.

Posted by: Judy-Ree | October 2, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Didn’t somebody preach something about pork, saying…”You will know their names, you will know their names, my friend”. Well, I was just thinking…can you please tell us the names of the Senators who added all this pork? Or maybe, you can’t because they are kind of like “your friends”.

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

No BAIL, send them to JAIL!
Plant your gardens, serfs. Your masters have spoken and voted for the bailout.
Better cling to your guns & religion when this house of cards comes tumbling down. Enjoy the bread & the circus for a bit more, Nero is tuning his fiddle & I smell smoke.
Plant your gardens, serfs. It will be all you have.
Our proud Republic is dead…

Posted by: TN Phil | October 2, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Can we just take names here…the guys that added the pork. Those are the guys I want to see the names of, especially the Arrow guy. He has some pair of cojones.

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

“Why did the McCain campaign pay for Cindy’s personal trip to Asia?”
Is that what this article is about?
I don’t know that they did or didn’t pay for her trip. Do you have a source for that?

Posted by: TIRED OF PORK | October 2, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

1. APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO CRIMINALLY INDICT ANYONE ON WALL STREET WHO KNOWINGLY CONTRIBUTED TO THIS COLLAPSE.
2. THE RICH MUST PAY FOR THEIR OWN BAILOUT. They may have to live in 5 houses instead of 7.
3. BAIL OUT THE PEOPLE LOSING THEIR HOMES, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BUILD AN EIGHTH HOME. There are 1.3 million homes in foreclosure right now. That is what is at the heart of this problem.
4. IF YOUR BANK OR COMPANY GETS ANY OF OUR MONEY IN A “BAILOUT,” THEN WE OWN YOU. Sorry, that’s how it’s done. If the bank gives me money so I can buy a house, the bank “owns” that house until I pay it all back — with interest.
5. ALL REGULATIONS MUST BE RESTORED. THE REAGAN REVOLUTION IS DEAD. This catastrophe happened because we let the fox have the keys to the henhouse.
6. IF IT’S TOO BIG TO FAIL, THEN THAT MEANS IT’S TOO BIG TO EXIST.
7. NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD BE PAID MORE THAN 40 TIMES THEIR AVERAGE EMPLOYEE, AND NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD RECEIVE ANY KIND OF “PARACHUTE” OTHER THAN THE VERY GENEROUS SALARY HE OR SHE MADE WHILE WORKING FOR THE COMPANY.
8. STRENGTHEN THE FDIC AND MAKE IT A MODEL FOR PROTECTING NOT ONLY PEOPLE’S SAVINGS, BUT ALSO THEIR PENSIONS AND THEIR HOMES.
9. EVERYBODY NEEDS TO TAKE A DEEP BREATH, CALM DOWN, AND NOT LET FEAR RULE THE DAY.
10. CREATE A NATIONAL BANK, A “PEOPLE’S BANK.” If we really are itching to print up a trillion dollars, instead of giving it to a few rich people, why don’t we give it to ourselves? Now that we own Freddie and Fannie, why not set up a people’s bank? One that can provide low-interest loans for all sorts of people who want to own a home, start a small business, go to school, come up with the cure for cancer or create the next great invention.

Posted by: Dave | October 2, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Contact your Congressmen now. Tell them NO!

Posted by: Andrew | October 2, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Did “Hagar The Horrible” write in the wooden arrows for children in this bailout? If ten prominent economists are against the bailout, who besides the politicians are for it? These people tell us that the ship is sinking and include 2 millions for wooden arrows! They are even more stupid than I thought. Did they all come from the insane asylum?

Posted by: jonny36 | October 2, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Derrek: You appear to be the only other person who realizes how bad this is. Most people don’t have a clue as to the ramifications that will happen if this bill is not passed.
This credit crisis will affect everyone!!
It’s too bad most wont get it until they’ve lost their jobs and savings.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

You’re kidding me with the railroad thing right? Maintenance is part of the cost of doing business, just like pencils and paperclips. It isn’t profit and therefore should not be taxed in the first place. The RR companies are already getting ripped off to the tune of 50% of that cost, are they supposed to be grateful? By the way, NOT taxing something exhorbitantly doesn’t mean that it “costs” anything. It isn’t money being given, it’s money not being confiscated.

Posted by: KS | October 2, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

This is for all of “WE Middle Class Losers” – - -
The Elusive American Dream – - -
The Creeps with the fishing pole represent our CON Gress Men and Women !!!

Posted by: Dave | October 2, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

I like your idea!!!
If you vote for any candidate other than a dem or rep you just might put the dem or rep in to office that you did not want.
A vote for McCain is a VOTE AGAINST THE MEDIA. DON’T LET THE MEDIA WIN….they have worked so hard TO SELL THEIR PRODUCT; let them know how hard it is to work and then get kicked in the teeth.
Posted by: s | Oct 2, 2008 2:31:07 PM

Posted by: Naive | October 2, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This is such crap! Everyone please remember who feathered whose nest at reelection time. Everyone needs to be voted OUT!

Posted by: Donna | October 2, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

McCain is pulling out of Michigan to run in Maine??? Maine is solid blue?

Posted by: MM | October 2, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Vote NO! Tell Congress now.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

The junk in the bill is the compromise for both parties to vote for it. Each group gets their little pet project taken care of. Unfortunately this is how politics works. I am not saying Im for it but if we don’t do something we won’t be discussiing pork but soup lines.

Posted by: vakcmo | October 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I am disgusted, as most of you are. They tell us we are on the verge of economic collapse and then they add all these earmarks. A clean bill would have been hard to swallow, but this one is horrible. We need to vote every senator and congressman out of office when they are up for re-election. My senator is running for re-election this year, and his vote yes has been duly noted. You watch his old butt lose the election. As far as McCain and Obama go, I am sick of both of them telling us they are for hope, change, reform. Neither one of them are worth our vote. I hope each of you will truly put your anger to work in the voting booth whenever your representative or senator come up for re-election. Please, don’t forget.

Posted by: Bill | October 2, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

What Congress lacks in sagacity
They offset with mendacity.
And all the while, they’ll strut about
Until we vote those ******** out.
All of them are simply feckless;
Their actions are completely reckless.
And all the while, they’ll strut about
Until we vote those ******** out.
Sorry, had to vent a little.
I hope that I did not offend.
But if Congress wants to sit and fiddle
Well, it’s time we bring that to an end.

Posted by: Fed Up | October 2, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I think a bailout was needed, but not this added to, expanded version. I am very disappointed that Obama and McCain did not say NO to these add-ons and insist they be removed. I think the House will have a hard time voting for this new and expanded bailout when they couldn’t swallow the last one! Now we all will see our 401K’s go further down the tubes. I am more than sick that after a lifetime of working and saving, my 401K has dropped to a point that I am having trouble sleeping. I am afraid we are in for an economic collapse if something isn’t done, but I assure you I am SO disgusted with the idea of this bill. I wish there was some way the people responsible for this could be held accountable.

Posted by: Mack | October 2, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Term limits are the only two words that make sense.

Posted by: Mellow Drama | October 2, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

It is a shame that our nation’s leaders can’t get anything passed through the House or Senate without adding unnecessary extras – wasting even more tax money as we struggle to survive. Shame on all of you. When will you understand that the losers will not be individuals – our country will lose. Wake up – start being responsible stewards of our tax money.

Posted by: Terri | October 2, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Derrek: I think your problem is you don’t owe enough money to get a loan. My boss gets credit card after credit card and never pays the full balance. She just quit’s paying when they get maxed out and when they call she makes up some kind of story and settles for 1/2 of what she owes. Then she starts over again with another credit card. She just bought her son who is in college and lives in an apartment that costs more than my house note a brand new expensive car and financed it too. She finances everything and the banks love her. It’s because she has bad credit and they can charge her more interest. That is how these idiots got into this mess in the first place.

Posted by: Katie | October 2, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Can I please have $2,000,000 worth of wooden arrows so I can shoot them up the **** of all the politicians in Washington?!!!

Posted by: Jack | October 2, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

The best way that we can get our economy quickly moving again is not by bailing out the big bad banks with 750 billion dollars but by giving that money to the homeless. It is estimated that there are three million homeless people in the United States that are costing the government billions each year to feed and shelter them. A grant of 250 thousand dollars to each person that can prove that they have been homeless for over a year would cost less money then the amount that the government is ready to waste on bailing out the banks. The results would produce the greatest spending spree in American history and jump start our economy. An added benefit would be that many of the homeless would purchase homes that have been foreclosed and bring added life to the housing market. Some Americans would be envious of the new found wealth of our most unfortunate citizens, but instead they should welcome their large contribution to our economy.

Posted by: melvin polatnick | October 2, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

i hope to god the house has the balls to once again stand up and say NO BAILOUT. it should be illegal to add anything to a bill once it has been voted on (and denied the first time!) i am sickened at just how corrupt our system is. if this passes, i truly hope something horrible happens – a karmic act of god that removes these idiots from the face of the earth.

Posted by: bruce s. | October 2, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Appalling. There was also some verbiage about mustard seeds. Is there a way to attach this nonsense t a particular Senator? Or do you have to watch CSPAN 24/7?
If you think this is bad – wait until the house gets done with it. They have an alternative that has retroactive tax cuts for corporations who have lost money (5 years) and tax cuts for corporations who have sent their plants overseas and have lost money. Call your congressman/woman. Demand that these be taken out. Talk about welfare for the rich and foolish.

Posted by: mara | October 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Does everyone realize credit slowed down 14 months ago? Many on tv are acting like it started last week. Go online, do some research. This is being shoved down our throats and the facts are being misrepresented.

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

The Clown of the Year Award goes to two Special Clowns, Sens. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, and Gordon Smith, a Republican, both were the tricksters behind the ARROW Pork. The Arrow company is of course in Oregon, home of these two bozos.

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

The Government can no longer guard the henhouse. So now, they are going to sell them to the fox. When the fox ‘owns’ the henhouse, Americans will not have oversite. So how bout we privatize wall street as we would our medicare system, or the Veterans Administration……..’a non-Vet CEO making millions, asks the tax payers to cover mismanagement….oh wait, maybe we would have accountability if we leave it where it is…..

Posted by: ray | October 2, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Remember this. “There’s honor among thiefs”. Why don’t our HONORABLE representatives use some of their non-taxedable dollars and help out! Not a chance!

Posted by: Chuck | October 2, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The Senate must be salivating over that Puerto Rico’s rum.
Now the party can begin, cheap booze for everyone voting for them, all thanks to uncle Sam and the Senate.

Posted by: thinker | October 2, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

MARKET–HEAL THY SELF!
CONGRESS–JUST SAY NO!

Posted by: reneshay | October 2, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Remember this. “There’s honor among thiefs”. Why don’t our HONORABLE representatives use some of their non-taxedable dollars and help out! Not a chance!

Posted by: Chuck | October 2, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

We need to organize and stop the flow of the capital’s life line, our tax dollars. CHANGE YOUR W-4 line 7 to claim EXEMPT. The time for change is at hand. – R69

Posted by: Romulus69th | October 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

All of these morons should be voted out of office. Let’s pad this bill with pork too. Business as usual and the tax payers will continue to pay.

Posted by: trump | October 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Dear “Born in America”,
You say “WE elected them! Well, not exactly. The Electoral College elects them”. Well, as you say, not exactly.
Someone born in America should understand that senators (2 per state) and representatives (total 435) are elected by a simple majority of the people who live in the state they represent. (There are a couple of states that use a runoff instead.)
The electoral college is used to protect the rights of the smaller states and to indirectly select a head of state. It is used because we are the United “States” of America, not the United “People” of America.
The popular vote is used as a kind of recommendation to the members of the college as to which candidate they should vote.
In other words, a candidate must win a majority of college members for the privilege of leading the entire country. (The word “leading” has changed somewhat during the past 8 years.)
The number of electoral votes in each state is a total of their representatives plus their 2 senators. Texas, for instance, has 32 representatives plus 2 senators for a total of 34 electoral votes. DC gets 3. The total for the entire country is 538 (435 representatives + 100 senators plus 3 for DC).
All but 2 states use a “winner take all” approach. For instance, if a majority of voters in Texas vote for Obama (I desperately hope) then Obama gets all 34 of its electoral votes.
Critics claim the electoral college gives the bigger states too much influence over the election and why candidates spend more time there trying to sway voters.

Posted by: US Origins | October 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

A hundred billion extra of pork. 800,000,000,000,000.00 now to bail out fat cat backroom contributors by trained monkeys in Congress.

Posted by: Joe Brailleio | October 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

November is fast approaching.
FIRST: Vote EVERY incumbent out of office.
SECOND: Vote for Nadar for President.
Who cares about political party when both the Democrats and Republicans are on the take.
Time for a voter uprising!

Posted by: Walt | October 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

We really need term limits and line item veto passage now.

Posted by: Ken | October 2, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Contact your congressmen. Tell them to vote NO!

Posted by: Brian | October 2, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

When did we start privatizing gains and nationalizing losses. This is ridiculous. Take 1 minute and tell Congress find a real solution and to Vote NO on this bailout.

Posted by: Kyle | October 2, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

…remember when the Republicans were bragging about Palins ability to bring needed revenue to the state of Alaska….well, what do you think that was, but the very kind of sweetnsour pork we are seeing here. This is how congress sets itself up to say they were against the bailout….but bought out local interests…….

Posted by: ray | October 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Don’t stop at contacting your representatives. Also contact your Senator that voted yes and tell them they lost your vote. Both of mine in Texas voted yes and they not getting my vote again.

Posted by: Katie | October 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Arrows, rum and racetracks? You notice there isn’t a dime for “foolish” things, like healthcare, education, care for the elderly, you know, things we REALLY need? My parents are in hock up to their teeth trying to pay for round the clock nursing for my bedridden father. My mother worked 38 years and gets $426 in Social Security. And all she gets are arrows, racetracks and rum? Unbelievable! I am ashamed to call myself an American, with this idiocy.

Posted by: Saoirse | October 2, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

The only pork that I like is the Booze Pork…Rum. Nothing like a nice Rum drink to relax. The other porks sucks.

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I’M NOT PAYING AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU!
This bill s u c k s! Congress is CRAZY!
America do NOT let this pass! Burn the phone lines to Congress up and keep it up! Call them every day and often! Joe Wilson (R)SC – Vote NO or you are OUT!

Posted by: john copeland | October 2, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Those pointing fingers at the other team’s candidate or representatives are missing the point: McCain and Obama BOTH voted for and vocally supported this package.
Remember, they aren’t the only ones running for president next month:
Most importantly: take an interest in local politics, not just the big races; local politics drives the bigger picture, and if we can regain control locally, we can take back our country. We, the people, can’t regain control from the top-down. We have to work from the bottom-up, slowly, over time.

Posted by: jeremy | October 2, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I’m afraid I have some bad news. Theres going to be a collapse no matter what the morons do. Just lining their pockets.The best thing you can do is show them whos boss and vote em out of office!!!!!

Posted by: Rick C. Weinberg | October 2, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I just took down my American flag .. and will never display it again! This is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever read in my life!! Arrows and rum? To hell with a Million Man March .. DO NOT pay your taxes this year! Each and every one of us should march on DC!! What are they going to do – arrest all of us?? Good luck with that!

Posted by: Marcus | October 2, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

This would be a good time to contact your representatives in the House and urge them not to vote for the bail out:
Hi, my name is ________ and I’m a resident of ______. I’m calling to voice my strong opposition to ANY financial bailout. Government regulations caused our problems on Wall Street and the bailout will force my family to shoulder the burden of government’s failure. Vote no on the bailout.”
Oh, by the way McCain is making a big mistake. There are a lot of us here who would vote for him simply because he is not a Marxist, Racist, Sexist, who surrounds himself with radicals and hates the pledge, the flag and everything that made this country great.

Posted by: justashoprat | October 2, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Oh yeah, say “no” to the pork-n-stuff.

Posted by: jsub | October 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

The current economic crisis and the Wall Street impending meltdown is the consequence of mismanagement, greed and prolong wars under the Bush Administration for the last 8 years. The now $850 billion Senate passed bailout bill is similar to a carpenter adding a 2×4 to the termites infested beam which will hold the roof from collapsing a little bit longer. If Congress is not going to listen to the opposing voice of the people, they might as well raise the bailout to, say $450 billion pork barrel more since Congress has 3 times more members than the Senate. That may hold Bush economic roof from collapsing longer, but to the sweats & pains of the American people.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

hey, who took it off, stop censoring my posts – this ain’t Iran yet!

Posted by: jsub | October 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Jail them NOT bail them!

Posted by: shannonstar3 | October 2, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Call and email Congress. Tell them NO Bailout!

Posted by: Tyler | October 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I am sensored too! Had great message. Said that I was SPAM!

Posted by: shannonstar3 | October 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I’m sure that American Samoa credit or whatever it is has something to do with Pelosi’s husband having some commercial interests there (Starkist tuna)

Posted by: I give up | October 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

McSame, Obummer, and all their colleagues, just pigs at the trough filled up by you and me. Didn’t they have a tea party in Boston once to address this ? Time to bring back public flogging of these miscreants.

Posted by: YOMAMA | October 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I love reading all of these people that were republicans yesterday jumpin ship.

Posted by: Renegadepig | October 2, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Also, this is clearly BOTH parties at work here. If you say the TV/Film was by the dems, then clearly the Motorsports Racetrack Property was by the GOP.
Both parties are at fault for this ridiculousness. I think everyone can agree that this system is broken!
Posted by: In the dark | Oct 2, 2008 12:39:11 PM
***********************************
I absolutely agree.
It doesn’t help that BOTH Presidential candidates ignored We The People and voted instead for this bill which will probably not have the desired effect.

Posted by: Whatever | October 2, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

a majority of the united states senate in session last night did with malice of forethought commited a horrendous act of moral cowardice and in the not too datant future there shall be a monument erected to mark the demise of the republic of the united states of america based on the premise of government of the people, by the people and for the people and each and every name of those in the united states senate who commted this act shall be affixed

Posted by: john smith | October 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Believe me, the people who voice out their opposition to the TARP bailout plan in this blog, are honest, hard work average American people who have suffer under the misrule of the Bush administration. They truly represent the voice of America. I am appeal to the representatives of the House to listen carefully to the their voice. This is your last chance to make the nation right. So when you go to bed in the middle of the night, your conscience will not bother you. When you talk to you grand children in the future, you can tell them how proud you standup for your country men.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I do believe it was the republican house members who couldn’t muster the original one. so are they sweetening up the deal for, them?
Posted by: make it known | Oct 2, 2008 12:42:33 PM
***************************************
Stop the partisan politics.
There were dozens of Dems who did not vote for the House bill as well.
The bill was defeated through bipartisanship.
Sadly, only 25 people in the Senate were looking out for us.
Even worse, neither Presidential candidate was in the 25.

Posted by: Whatever | October 2, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I will vote on NOBODY who wanted this bill. I will write in my own candidate.

Posted by: shannonstar3 | October 2, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Justifying these add on’s by saying that “they were already in the books and we are already paying for them” is UNBELIEVABLE. I am a McCain supporter, but am very disappointed. When it comes to our economy, BOTH candidates will be “more of the same”. Who the heck can we turn to????
Posted by: Art Texas | Oct 2, 2008 2:06:51 PM
************************************
I supported McCain until he voted FOR this bill. I vowed to not vote for anyone who voted in favor of this bill and I mean to stick to it.
I don’t like the 3rd party candidates either.
In other words, I have no idea what I’m going to do in November.
Those 75 Senators sold out the American people yesterday. They are no better than the British crown just prior to the Revolution.

Posted by: Whatever | October 2, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Does anybody know John Lewis Congressman from Georgia? How do I get hold of him to tell him “Hell No”.

Posted by: thebeardog1st | October 2, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Would tell you who I am looking at for write in but that goes against the censorship on this network!

Posted by: shannonstar3 | October 2, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Marcy Kaptur- I like her! Still looking and researching!

Posted by: shannonstar3 | October 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

The economy has been dwindling down since eight years ago with only a few favored cronies cornering the good stuff (such as military contractors & oil companies). There can not be a magic “p”ill (bill) that can cure the economic illness miraculously near the end of Bush administration. It will just be the last chance for the cronies to fatten more their pockets.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

They are calling this a rescue but are adding so much stuff to it. This is ridiculous. They need to sit down with economists and other great leaders to figure out a real, long-lasting solution.
We’ve already given billions to AIG, Fannie/Freddie, etc. and the problems are still there. This will be $700 billion down the tubes.
Call your Congress members and tell them to vote NO!

Posted by: Brent | October 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Instead of giving that $700 billion to all of these companies and spending it on stupid crap like rum and arrows… why don’t they take that $700 billion and divided it equally among all American tax payers? Give THE PEOPLE a chance to recoup OUR LOSSES and at the same time, we’re still paying it back at tax time. When do WE THE PEOPLE get to SPEND OUR OWN MONEY? Our radio show talk hosts had it all figured out this morning, lets vote them into the White House instead!!! Their estimate figured each American tax payer would receive $250,000. Make it tax free for 1 or 2 yrs for middle and lower class families, let people spend the money and get our market back up and going on its own. Leave it to the people to decide how to spend OUR MONEY on things WE NEED and want.
I vote Bob and Brian for President!

Posted by: Dawn | October 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

What we need to know is who put each of these in, or whom it will benefit.

Posted by: Yorgus | October 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Throw ALL of them out .. every last one – this was passed with bipartisanship so let’s let them ALL go out together!!

Posted by: Marcus | October 2, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Regarding the nearly half billion this bill would award to the Hollywood studios, I am an elected officer of a Hollywood film local and have worked 35 years on Hollywood film sets.
I ABSOLUTELY OPPOSE THIS GIVEAWAY. This apparently grew out of a similar subsidy awarded in the so-called American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. At that time, a large portion of Hollywood film production was going overseas where producers were lured by tax subsidies. If it had an effect on runaway jobs, we never felt it. Now the Bailout bill seeks to extend this.
The problem is due to the weak dollar, runaways to foreign countries all but ended a couple of years ago. This half billion dollar gift to the studios is to solve a problem that doesn’t exist! Not only that, but the studios get half their revenues from overseas so the sinking dollar has been a windfall for them.
This isn’t to say Hollywood is still dying, but now it’s dying from subsidies offered by over half our states.

Posted by: Michael Everett | October 2, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Americans need to wake up to facts. My parents did not buy anything they could not pay for. That example has kept me out of financial trouble. All citizens need to look around their homes and see all the stuff they buy. Congress is doing the same thing. Let’s start living within our means. Yes we need term limits.

Posted by: Annie Oakley | October 2, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

The bailout is now 1,000 pages long. This isn’t the correct way to fix this mess. Contact Congress now and tell them to vote no.

Posted by: Josh | October 2, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

It is clear that any YES vote for this BAILOUT bill by any member of Congress should immediately subject them to no hope of election. This is what I have told each of my Senators (only one was up for re-election), my Congressman (He voted NO the first time), and told McCain who I thought I would vote for. Until these fools clean up the causes of the mess, just handing out money wont solve anything.
Obama and McCain clearly are not leaders and can’t lead the way out mess and we need to vote third party, either CONSTITUTION PARTY or LIBERTARIAN PARTY. The Democrats and Republicans are useless except to pick our pockets.

Posted by: Jeff G | October 2, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

This “dole-out” bill could be compared to the parents of an alcoholic (Congress) giving their addicted child (Wall St.) a keg, a tap and the keys to a new car (the object(s) of their abuse) using money they raised at the police station fund-raiser (our tax money) and then attempting to bribe us (the police) with gifts (incentives to the bill) so that we’ll look the other way…
Loosen up the credit market? What freakin’ difference does that make?… Ohhhh….. help people go further into debt while they still have no job security and now pay incresed gas expenses etc… sounds like a freakin’ recipe for disaster… How are you helping John Q. Public maintain a liveable income? or a job?

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | October 2, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

thebeardog1st
John Lewis Congressman from Georgia
and the send and e-mail

Posted by: Jeff G | October 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Why not cap interest rates on credit cards? Oops, that would be main street not wall street.

Posted by: Nelly | October 2, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

This makes me so ****** off I could scream. I will not vote for any incumbents this year. Also not voting for Obama. He got allot of money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack. Plus all his advisors got lots of money. If people do the research they find that this who mess comes from bills that Carter and Clinton signed. Check it out people. Find out the truth before you vote.

Posted by: B | October 2, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

This “dole-out” bill could be compared to the parents of an alcoholic (Congress) giving their addicted child (Wall St.) a keg, a tap and the keys to a new car (the object(s) of their abuse) using money they raised at the police station fund-raiser (our tax money) and then attempting to bribe us (the police) with gifts (incentives to the bill) so that we’ll look the other way…
Loosen up the credit market? What freakin’ difference does that make?… Ohhhh….. help people go further into debt while they still have no job security and now pay incresed gas expenses etc… sounds like a freakin’ recipe for disaster… How are you helping John Q. Public maintain a liveable income? or a job?

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | October 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Until we, the American people take back our country, this is the nonsense we can expect. There in no one protecting us…WE need to take back this country!!!!! I do believe it is time for another Boston Tea Party, however instead of tossing the tea..toss those in office!!! Every politician that is up for reelection…say NO!!! Put someone else in there…as far as the Presidential candidates, do a write in, like Powell. WE as a people should march on Washington, sending a message that we are done with “business as usual” its time to do the unusual…start a revolution of our own!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sheryl | October 2, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“Vote NO! Tell Congress now.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

They know we the public are watching closely yet they pull this?? How stupid do they think we really are–Man do we elect stupid people to represent us—some democracy we practise here folks—-

Posted by: tom | October 2, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Now I know how the average Roman felt the day Cesear ended the Republic. I’ll look at the bright side, I’m living a day that will be remembered for thousands of years.

Posted by: EOBF | October 2, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

AFP:
“Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz warned the rescue package was unlikely to restore economic stability.
“It’s like giving a massive blood transfusion to a person bleeding from an internal hemorrhage,” he said during a speech in Austria.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Only complete morons are still making partisan posts regarding this obvious coup that is being waged against the people of this country by BOTH political parties…

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | October 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

– Yes the bill is full of pork but some of it is bar-b-que and some of it is just pig meat. –
I went through it.. all 451 pages.. and it’s unbelievable. Not mentioned in the article are provisions related to mental health and addition, abandoned mine reclamation, wool ‘research’, enhanced deductions for book donations, permanent authority for disclosure related to terrorist activity, farm equipment depreciation, tax preparation penalties, rural school security and ‘self-determination’.. and it goes on.
The first clue should have been when Dubba went on TV not once, but twice, claiming how it was imperative to push this through.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

They’re not listening to us! Most of us are saying NO; the economists who understand this stuff are saying NO; yet OUR Government is saying YES to shafting We the People. Taxation without representation. It’s time to stop it. They think we’re asleep or stupid or both. Let’s inundate them with e-mails and phone calls and then throw them out of office. Both candidates are sorry choices. I’m going to hold my nose and vote for the lesser of two evils: McCain. Obama would finish us off with his socialistic agenda – but then that’s where we’re headed anyway.

Posted by: Mary | October 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“Only complete morons are still making partisan posts regarding this obvious coup that is being waged against the people of this country by BOTH political parties…”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Congress is greedy and corrupt. Shame on them
we need to clean house in our government. Get rid of all those fat cats.Those people make Millions of dollars a year and I ( we ) have to decide if I (we )should buy my medicine or food.
And I know there are millions of people just like me. We can’t do this. Congress is the problem!! Get rid of all them ( they need to be investigated) and put new ones in and if they don’t do right kick their butts out and investigate them, fine them.
Make them pay back their wages.
Better yet make all our politicians work for minimum wages

Posted by: concerned in AR | October 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

As usual another bill the politicians cram in more pork so that Senators/Reps can get their election committees funded by the lobbyists. Look at these amendments that are stuffed in. Usual crap by our paid for politicians.

Posted by: A.T. sullivan | October 2, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

* The Wool Trust Fund — Cost: $148 million over ten years
Extends a provision that reduces import duties on a limited quantity of imported wool fabrics and places duties otherwise collected on the import of certain wool products into the Wool Trust Fund, which promotes the competitiveness of American wool.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

It’s a darn good thing there isn’t REALLY a “terrorist” problem. Just imagine.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

If your vote is on the Yea side of the ledger, Mr. Representative or Mr. Senator, you will not see another term in office. So says the American taxpayer. You are a thief of the highest magnitude.

Posted by: Maxify55 | October 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

from nakedcapitalism:
“Herbert Hoover’s Reconstruction Finance Corporation of 1931-32, which made loans to politically connected companies, didn’t do much to alleviate the Great Depression. An equivalent amount of welfare handed out through the “Veterans’ Bonus”, which Hoover opposed, might have boosted consumption and stabilised the economy more quickly.”
“Our” Congressional quislings aren’t even saying where/how the Treasury is being bestowed. How can ANYbody vote for this crap and not fear tar and feathers should he/she ever dare to return to his/her district?
Could they have been drugged with something through the air vents? Or WHAT?

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

If this doesn’t seem ludicrous to you, then you are part of the problem. This is absolutely a horrible plan (why do they call it a plan? – there is NO plan – just robbery of the American citizens designed to “look” like a bill). We MUST stand up call this what it is – A CRIME.

Posted by: Robin Pond | October 2, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Only in America! life is Great! Down’t need a wallet. Before long we won’t even need pockets. Because we won’t have a damn thing to put in them!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

What?! McCain and Obama didn’t complain about the extra 100 billion in pork added to this bill? How much do want to bet the House will pile on bringing this to an even trillion? Any takers?

Posted by: J Q Public | October 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Money? We don’t need any stinking money. The government will take care of us!!! Food line forms here–>

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I guess American taxpayers have to hire a lobbyist to get a tax reduction.
This gov’t most certainly isn’t representative of the people.

Posted by: Lori | October 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Has anyone thought about how much power we are giving to the Treasury? There is nothing in this bill about when this will stop and how we will get our freedoms back.

Posted by: Alan | October 2, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

What happened to The Maverick? His platform has been to end the earmarks… ‘You will know their names!’ Yeah right.

Posted by: Kimiki | October 2, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I think we should all migrate to Mexico. I think the peso has more value than the dollar now.

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Come to think of it! Maybe that is why Obama thinks we should learn spanish. Invade Mexico next.

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

This administration has been so corrupt. Paulson’s power is unprecidented. Now our Congress is complicit.
I wonder if this will cost Obama and McCain votes.

Posted by: Denny | October 2, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Well Denny, I can tell you that my abesentee ballot is sitting here unmarked. I’ve been a decided voter. But this has lended me pause. I don’t know if I will vote at this point, for either one.

Posted by: Sandy | October 2, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Think we are screwed now? Wait till next year! Election over, new president, can afford to give a tax break now! Have to pay for this mess!!! Sorry, have to raise some $$. Going to have to raise taxes!!

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

“I wonder if this will cost Obama and McCain votes.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Welcome to our world. People in Illinois are used to it. It doesn’t matter what’s right or wrong. It’s all about taking care of the people who “paid” to get them there and now you are seeing that paybacks are a b**ch.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 2, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

This problem has taken months or longer to develop. But suddenly Bush notes it and it must be fixed immediately and with large sums and unchallenged authority given to a few.
Why wasn’t this country’s economists given time to study this problem and offer solutions? Than if a bailout was still needed, then ok. There is NO excuse for the pork. Ever.

Posted by: Carolyn | October 2, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Hate to say it, but McCain HAD to vote for it. After saying we needed it. He had no choice. Otherwise the Dems would have been all over him.

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

John McCain…make them famous. Tell us their names. I’d like to know who proposed these earmarks. Then I’d like to know why my senators voted to support this despite the flood of email/calls to the contrary.

Posted by: Catherine | October 2, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

This bill gives up too much of our freedoms and doesn’t address how we will get them back from the Treasury. This is the Patriot Act all over again.

Posted by: Brent | October 2, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

How did Obama, McCain, and Biden vote?

Posted by: Cheri Harding | October 2, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

This problem has been coming on for years. Congress was warned many times and need I say. The Dems blocked any form of reform. Even blocked Clinton from it only to be pushed into making it worse. In FACT! Obama worked at a law firm the was suing banks that didn’t want to loan money to non credit wothy people. He was the lawyer that represented the law firm in the suits. This is a TRUE FACT that CAN be backed up! You will not see anything about this on CNN,ABC, or any of the elite media channels.

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

McCain didn’t vote for this bc of the dems. He voted for this to stay in line w/ Bush, support these lobby groups, and the fat cats that’s receiving this $. This vote really hurt his campaign. Glenn Beck has been all over all day.

Posted by: Mac | October 2, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I suspect that Obama and McCain may have striken a deal, that they vote on the same page on the $850 Senate revised TARP bail out bill. This bill is so huge and they do not want to take side and risk their candidacy. Once again, when a politician personal interest is involved, he/she will not care about the constituents.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Absolutely ridiculous and infuriating: it seems the Senate can’t even vote to ADJOURN without passing some special interest earmark appropriation in the process. Any senator of character should repudiate this bill; the others should apologize to the American people. Heck, that just might BUILD character!

Posted by: Riverside Bryants | October 2, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

I simply cannot believe they voted for this after adding to the sum. As if the origninal proposal wasn’t bad enough.
This is BOTH parties at work.

Posted by: Mary | October 2, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I suspect that Obama and McCain may have striken a deal, such that they vote on the same page on the $850 Senate revised TARP bail out bill. This bill is so huge and they do not want to take side and risk their popularity. Once again, when a politician personal interest is involved, he/she will not care about the constituents.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 2, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

* The Wool Trust Fund — Cost: $148 million over ten years
Is that Wool or Bull ?

Posted by: fool me once | October 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

How do you like that! I keep getting flagged for trying to put links on here now. I guess ABC doesn’t want much of the TRUTH out there.

Posted by: Vagent | October 2, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Here’s the best bailout program around. Pay off everybody’s Mortgage, up to 400K. For those that have already paid their mortgage, give them 100K. For those that rent, give them 50K. Now everybody has money to spend and fuel the economy. We can pay it back over 30 years at a flat fee so that they make a 30K profit over the life of the loan…30 years, and prorated for lower years.

Posted by: Jake | October 2, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

The federal reserve has already pumped a TRILLION DOLLARS into the banking system. Why do we need more?
The cry from Bush “We gotta pass this quick!!” is how we got into Iraq. Is Congress going to fall for it again?
The politicians see a way to rob We The People again. Free money hand outs to thier cronnies.
Is anyone in congress listening???
WE THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT THIS !!!

Posted by: Double D | October 2, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

—–Simon’s Rescue Plan—
We should nationalize 50% of the rich people assets. The money that we got should be enough to bailout all homeowners, national debt, and wall street.
The rest of the money from the nationalization should be also enough to give every one of the American citizens a nice car as a Christmas gift.

Posted by: simon | October 2, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

When did we start privatizing gains and nationalizing losses. This is ridiculous. Take 1 minute and tell Congress find a real solution and to Vote NO on this

Posted by: Mark | October 2, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

“The cry from Bush “We gotta pass this quick!!” is how we got into Iraq. Is Congress going to fall for it again?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 2, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

They are calling this a rescue but are adding so much stuff to it. This is ridiculous. They need to sit down with economists and other great leaders to figure out a real, long-lasting solution.
We’ve already given billions to AIG, Fannie/Freddie, etc. and the problems are still there. This will be $700 billion down the tubes.
Call your Congress member, tell them to vote NO.

Posted by: Joseph | October 2, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Each and every congressman supporting the bailout of legalized crooks should be voted out in November. (Rescue, my a..) They do not represent the people who put them into office. Why don’t they add this on the ballot in November and let the American taxpayers vote on it?

Posted by: Vonzy | October 2, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Doesn’t anybody remember Ross Perot warning us about the Giant Sucking sound of all your jobs leaving the USA down to Mexico as the Goverment pushed NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement). He was right! We soon saw all the manufacturing jobs leave the USA and go to Mexico and overseas. Your Goverment told you that they would replace all those jobs with “Service Sector Jobs”. Basically Insurance, Banking and Technology. Then those Companies started Off Shoring all the Jobs to India, China and Asia! When your Goverment complained the companies said they could not find skilled American workers! The Goverment created a H1B Visa program that allowed them to bring in even lower paid workers (slaves,,,work or your deported) to replace even more American workers. When the consumers started to hurt they said ” We will give them MORE CREDIT” and America went into debt. When Wall Street and the banks finally recognized they could take no more from America they lobbied Congress to change the Bankruptcy laws and your elected “REPRESENTATIVES” did just that to keep you on the hook paying the MASTERS. Now that they cannot take anymore $$$$$’s from you they ask the GOVERMENT to take it with a 850 BILLION DOLLAR bail out to them!!!! FOOLS…..NO BAIL OUT

Posted by: overpaid ceo | October 2, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“We should nationalize 50% of the rich people assets. The money that we got should be enough to bailout all homeowners, national debt, and wall street.”
Simon I really hope you are Joking with what you just said. If you really believe that,maybe you should move to Venezuela, you will be right at home.

Posted by: Aden | October 2, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Way to go Jake. This is why I as a lifelong Democrat have left the party and become an Independent. I will never vote PARTY AGAIN. Palin is the only EARNEST politician, she is the maverick of corruption, she exceeds McCain.
Palin 2012

Posted by: bpower | October 3, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

While I was reading the Act text and came across this. I was so upset I started looking for more info on the web about who else saw this and was talking about it. I came across this site.
Who put these things in there? How do we bring more visibility into these types of issues and get the message across that this will no longer be acceptable?
It’s crazy.

Posted by: Can't believe it... | October 3, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I wonder if this “bailout” will pay for my car, bike, etc… Maybe, I should just stay home and collect “bailout” help because my job is too stressful. Or maybe, I just need a “bailout” fully paid vacation. When my credit card company calls asking to be paid should I just say, “bailout”? It’s funny that they used the word “bailout”, considering that this is criminal. God bless america, I hope He bails us out soon.

Posted by: jpmari | October 3, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Sheese this Country is in such deep trouble fiancially then why is our government spending money on such foolishness.

Posted by: Hillarysmygirl08 | October 3, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Somewhere I heard the definition of “Stupid” : Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result — does this ring a bell with anyone besides me???

Posted by: nora schick | October 5, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Bryon Wolf wrote Obma in office means Bryon Wolf all other offices will be empty. Bryon But rest assured you will be able to get a job at your favorit fast food restraunt

Posted by: Bryon Wolf | November 7, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Bryon Wolf Wrote how is next Bryon Wolf this is getting sisking Bryon Wolf Following ’round-the-clock weekend negotiations, the federal government late on Sunday agreed to bail out yet another bank, this time giving the troubled Citigroup a $20 billion lifeline in the form of a direct investment and guaranteeing $306 billion worth of its shaky assets, the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Financial Times, and others lead off their business coverage today.

Posted by: Bryon Wolf | November 24, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.