Neocons for Obama?
George Packer from the New Yorker magazine reports on an email he got from Ken Adelman today indicating that the neo-con is planning on voting for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.
As Packer points out, this is no small thing. Adelman was hired by Don "Rumsfeld at the Office of Economic Opportunity under Nixon, was assistant to Defense Secretary Rumsfeld under Ford, served as Reagan’s director of arms control, and joined the Defense Policy Board for Rumsfeld’s second go-round at the Pentagon, in 2001. Adelman’s friendship with Rumsfeld, Cheney, and their wives goes back to the sixties, and he introduced Cheney to Paul Wolfowitz at a Washington brunch the day Reagan was sworn in."
Said Adleman, to Packer: "Why so, since my views align a lot more with McCain’s than with Obama’s? And since I truly dread the notion of a Democratic president, Democratic House, and hugely Democratic Senate?
"Primarily for two reasons, those of temperament and of judgment.
"When the economic crisis broke, I found John McCain bouncing all over the place. In those first few crisis days, he was impetuous, inconsistent, and imprudent; ending up just plain weird. Having worked with Ronald Reagan for seven years, and been with him in his critical three summits with Gorbachev, I’ve concluded that that’s no way a president can act under pressure.
"Second is judgment. The most important decision John McCain made in his long campaign was deciding on a running mate.
"That decision showed appalling lack of judgment. Not only is Sarah Palin not close to being acceptable in high office—I would not have hired her for even a mid-level post in the arms-control agency. But that selection contradicted McCain’s main two, and best two, themes for his campaign—Country First, and experience counts. Neither can he credibly claim, post-Palin pick."
Read the rest of the e-mail HERE.
On the other hand — Adelman infamously suggested US forces would experience a "cakewalk in Iraq." So it’s not like his judgment is unassailable.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Yet another conservative abandons McCain based on his decision to pick Palin.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 20, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Who cares what a consummate political opportunist like Ken Adelman thinks? Again, another waste of good bandwidth.
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | October 20, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
How many liberal/dems vote for McCain?
Posted by: Voter In America | October 20, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Newt? Where are you Newt? Time to admit it – Obama is the better choice – Newt?
Posted by: Steve from NH | October 20, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
It’s good to see intelligent people coming to their senses.
Obama/Biden
Posted by: jen | October 20, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
It seems that Powell’s statement has helped others come forward.
I am an independent and have been appalled at what has been going on from both sides. Although, the McCain side seems to be 100% negative, the Obama side has about 40%. Just stating a fact.
Posted by: TexGal51 | October 20, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
SEE, I told you guys. Not ALL Republicans are ignorant.
Some realize that McCain saying he will fix the country if he’s President is like the Godfather saying he will fix crime if he’s elected Police Commisioner.
Posted by: Jumping ship because it's going down | October 20, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Who’s next?
Posted by: TexGal51 | October 20, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Isn’t Ken “Cakewalk” Adelman the same war monger who promoted the invasion of Iraq?
You lefties are so fickle and so easily bought.
Posted by: Captain America | October 20, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Another conservative who refuses to stand by McCain tries to foist himself upon an unwilling nation. I am not sure I will ever forgive McCain for what his campaign has done these last few weeks – turning a country – and the party – against itself. And he accuses Obama of being anti-America?
What happenned to Country First? He seems intent on destroying the country he professes to love so much. Not buying it. Not interested. And quite disgusted. He has uttterly disqualified himself and should be ashamed.
Posted by: Florida Republican | October 20, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
I am sure Bill and Hillary will be pulling the lever for McCain!
Posted by: chuck | October 20, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
True conservatives have a problem with Palin. It’s obvious this pick was to put a pacifier in the mouths of radical social/Christian-conservative theocrats and those that keep a years supply of deer corn and check their traps from time to time.
True conservatives are well read and have a solid base of requirements for their presidents. Sarah Palin is not even qualified for a temp job at a staffing agency.
Posted by: JV | October 20, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Adleman spoke the truth, something hard for many Republicans to swallow. They rather exist in ignorant bliss, much like Joe the Plumber.
Posted by: Sallie | October 20, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
McCain sooooooo wants to endorse Obama too.
Posted by: Me next oh me next | October 20, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Adelman isn’t black. What excuse will Rush Limbaugh come up with to explain Adelman’s support of Obama?
Posted by: Russell | October 20, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Who will endorse Obama nest? I suspect it will be Todd Palin.
Posted by: Truth Matters | October 20, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
In today’s Post-ABC tracking poll, Obama is winning 22 percent of conservatives.
That’s his best showing yet among these voters, and if the percent holds on Election Day, it would be higher than conservative support for any Democratic nominee since 1980.
Obama also wins 12 percent support among Republicans in the tracking poll, exactly double Kerry’s 2004 Election Day haul.
Posted by: beacon | October 20, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Go Obama. It will be a landslide!
Posted by: Tanya | October 20, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
keep it coming. YEAH OBAMA BABY!!!
Posted by: Tanya | October 20, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
I tell you that the real conservatives in this country should endorse (quietly) Obama’s campaign because he was raised through age 30 under 10 years of Kennedy/Johnson/Carter but 20 of Nixon/Ford/Reagan policies.
1. This shows that he prospered under relatively conservative policies.
2. He is the fruit of the “color blind” policies that were being pushed.
3. If elected, a lot the rationale for affirmative action and similar race-based quotas goes away because the system did work. He saw his opportunities and took them.
4. If he were a little more conservative (maybe a lot more), he would be the poster child of those folks.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | October 20, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
I wonder what Rush will say about this tomorrow. Can’t accuse Adelman of it being about race this time.
Posted by: annie | October 20, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
The Palin pick has been devastating for McCain and the GOP in general. After losing this election, the populist Palin phenomenon will cause a serious split in the GOP; many classic, well educated conservatives and many neocons from the Allan Bloom school enormously despise her and everything she stands for.
Posted by: herta | October 20, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
When was the last U.S. presidential election the Republican Party won without a Nixon or a Bush on the ticket?
1928, when Herbert Hoover won.
Posted by: History lesson | October 20, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Captain America,
Yes, Adelman did promote the invasion of Iraq. However, he also denounced the Bush administration for its incompetence in Iraq. He said that in light of that incompetence, the invasion was a mistake.
However, the significance of Adelman’s statement is that it shows that opposition to McCain isn’t limited to the far left. Adelman is not on the left, and neither is Colin Powell.
I am an independent. Most of my friends and relatives are Republicans and independents. All of us are voting for Obama for the same reasons that Adelman and Powell have expressed.
This election could have been John McCain’s to loose. But McCain caved in to the far right of his party, chose a stunningly unqualified running mate, behaved erratically during the recent market crisis, and has run an incompetent, shameful campaign based on attacking his opponent rather than discussing the issues.
You don’t have to be a member of moveon.org or even a garden-variety liberal to find that unacceptable in a man who seeks to be the leader of our nation.
Posted by: Lia | October 20, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Texgal,
Obama has only attacked McCain’s record and policies. Absolutely NO character issue ads despite a plethora of opportunities.
McCain is primarily attempting to malign Obama’s character with 100% negative ads until just the last day or so.
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Jake, Michelle Obama was rumored the other day to have gorged herself on $450 worth of Iranian caviar, lobster and champagne at the NY Waldorf-Astoria.
The pearl-clutching news, circulated on Limbaugh’s show and elsewhere, apparently derived from a New York Post gossip item that’s been deleted because – imagine this – Michelle Obama was nowhere near NYC on Wednesday.
I was stunnes to learn that self-proclaimed PUMA sites (such as the PUMA PAB blog) are promoting the story, complete with transparently awful photoshopped images of Michelle Obama’s “receipt.”
These PUMA folks are Limbaugh’s ideological love babies, and nothing else.
Shame on them.
BTW, the latest ABC/WaPo poll tells us that 91% of registered Democrats intend to vote for Obama. So much for “Clinton Democrats”, PUMA, and all that BS. They’re GOP fantasies that will be dust come Nov 4.
Posted by: tiger | October 20, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Michelle, who in this story is being fickled.
Posted by: d | October 20, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
President Palin? How can R’s stand around and pretend that Sarah Palin could or should be president.
Posted by: Bill | October 20, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Isn’t Ken “Cakewalk” Adelman the same war monger who promoted the invasion of Iraq?
You lefties are so fickle and so easily bought.
===
we don’t even have to ask them.. the rats are abandoning ship. It’s the neo-cons who are seeing the light!
Posted by: Gus | October 20, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Not To Worry…
There are still some voters out there that would vote for a stump if there were some religious agenda tacked to it.
Posted by: C A Wren | October 20, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“I found John McCain bouncing all over the place”
Really? All these guys start with a premise that has no basis in fact and then proceed to some equally ludicrous conclusion. He doesn’t think Gov. Palin is qualified to be President of the United States, a job she is not seeking. But Obama who has zero executive experience is qualified, apparently, since the man has decided to vote for Obama. Over the weekend, Powell opined similarly on the subject of Palin. His conclusion was reached based on Palin’s “recent performance”, presumably the Gibson and Couric interviews. Amazing. Mr. Powell comes to a conclusion based on the work product of two individuals who are qualified to do little more than read from a teleprompter and exhibit a range of facial expressions. Powell has never met Palin. And I am sure the latest “conservative” defector has likewise had zero interaction with Palin. So what do we conclude from all of this? That the electorate is populated with unthinking, illogical dopes?
Posted by: jcarob | October 20, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Obama is suspending his campaign.
Obama is showing that family is more important than his campaign. A man of “real” values.
His grandmother is sick and he is going to Hawaii.
Posted by: Julie | October 20, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Obama to take break to see sick grandmother
Citing the family’s desire for privacy, Gibbs would not discuss the nature of Dunham’s illness. It seemed likely that she was close to death, as Gibbs said that “everyone understands the decision that Sen. Obama is making.”
This would be the time for McCain to be courageous and show some humanity.
Stop the attacks for a few days….
There is still time to campaign, a few day… that’s all we’re asking for….
Posted by: CLabs | October 20, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
OxyCon: “how many al Queda terrorists we have killed in Iraq since Spring 2008?
Hundreds! All of these terrorists that are committed to killing Americans …” Please get a grip on reality. These people are fighting for THEIR TRIBE (Sunni, Shia, Kurd) against other TRIBES. The only thing they are jointly committed to is getting US to leave. And the surge has failed: there has been no political progress, the country remains a ruin, and violence is still worse than most recent civil wars. BTW, Al Qaeda’s base is in PAKISTAN, not IRAQ.
Posted by: Vietnam Vet | October 20, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Perhaps Mr. Powell reads Magazines or Newspapers. Hummm Actually there is a thing called the IN-TER-NET. You can read a great deal about Ms. Palin and her Alaskan Follies.
Posted by: C A Wren | October 20, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
@OxyCon
What is victory in Iraq? Such a simple question and McCain has no answer. Truth is, you cannot win a war when you haven’t defined victory. And you cannot liberate a people who doesn’t want to be liberated.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 20, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
jcarob: “(Adelman) doesn’t think Gov. Palin is qualified to be President of the United States, a job she is not seeking.” Not seeking? This is ridiculous. Please read the U.S. Constitution, Amendment XX, Section 3. Given the poor health of grandpa McCain, she would very likely become President, a truely terrifying thought.
Posted by: Vietnam Vet | October 20, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Mitt Romley couldn’t bring himself to say that Sarah Palin would make a good President. Nobody wants the news clip. Not even John McCain can bring himself to say it.
Letterman:”(Is Sarah Palin) the woman to lead us though the next 9/11 attack?”
“Absolutely, she is!”answered McCain. “She has inspired Americans. That’s the thing we need.”
Betcha he can’t say Sarah would make a good President, just sayin’
Posted by: doug | October 20, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Surprising, but not as surprising as it may seem if all you know of neocons is the media caricature. Contrary to popular prejudice, neocons have a strong pragmatic and anti-ideological streak.
Posted by: Judasmac | October 20, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
I can’t say I like Ken Adelman, but I respect his decision to put loyalty to country above loyalty to party. That’s an example i wish more republicans would follow. McCain and his smugly self-righteous attack dog Palin are a disgrace to this country.
Posted by: Albert Ronzo | October 20, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
I can’t say I like Ken Adelman, but I respect his decision to put loyalty to country above loyalty to party. That’s an example i wish more republicans would follow. McCain and his smugly self-righteous attack dog Palin are a disgrace to this country.
Posted by: Albert Ronzo | October 20, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
I think all the candidates are terrifying. I laugh every time I hear someone justify why they’re voting for a candidate. It always sounds like they’re talking about either one. What an election year!
Posted by: TEX | October 20, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I guess there’s only ONE huge miscalculation McCain did NOT make during his campaign:
picking Michele Bachmann for VP.
Posted by: GOP RIP | October 20, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
My thoughts and prayers goes out to the Obama’s family!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 20, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
“United” States of America. Welcome Adelman, welcome to America.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 20, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Judasmac: “neocons have a strong pragmatic and anti-ideological streak”. Wait a minute. Neocons at the top – like Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al – clung to their ideological fantasies of bringing “democracy” to the middle east, fighting wars with minimal troops, the “free market” etc., even when these have all proven disastrous. The reason neocons are failing – again, they tried this game in the 1980s – is that they put ideology ahead of facts and pragmatism.
Posted by: Vietnam Vet | October 20, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
This is for Mr. or Ms Lia who says some thing about how many Al Quaeda killed if we had wirthdrawn from Iraq in 2008.
Lia, do you know there were no Al Qayeda in Iraq before the invasion?
Why do not you think a little wiser? Like if only we had not waged this un just, unnecessary war, a quarter of a million innocent Iraqi men, women,children would have been saved. We Americans, the saviours of the civilized world would not have been carrying the blood of these innocent lives on our bloodied hands. 10 times as many would not have been wounded and left to die, thousands would not be suffering from nuclear, chemical related illnesses, mal formed children born recently would not have been born, 4500 Precious American soldiers’ lives would have been saved & in addtion, our 40,000 odd wounded soldiers would be living a normal life.
Why does not your crooked simpleton mind or brain think of this possibility?
Posted by: Nazrulla | October 20, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
“Contrary to popular prejudice, neocons have a strong pragmatic and anti-ideological streak.”
Excuse me? Please read the works of Leo Strauss, Allan Bloom et al and join the discussion again after you did indeed do so.
The neocons are idealists in the strict sense of the word; they’re adherents of Plato and his The Republic. The opposite, I’d say, of anti-ideological pragmatists.
Posted by: herta | October 20, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
“Who cares about Obama’s taking two days off!! There is more IMPORTANT NEWS THAT YOU SHOULD BE REPORTING!”
LOL
So you didn’t read what Jake was reporting on here.
You must be a great Palin fan.
Posted by: jeezz | October 20, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
“United” States of America. Welcome Adelman, welcome to America.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 20, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
I tell ya, you are all being had by Zero – those of you who hoped with all you well-intended expectations. He is not your Mr. anti-war-ior, not that he has been endorsed by the #1 compliant of the War, who sold it to the World, destroyed the reputation of America, and silenced himself when he knew everything went wrong. The bonehead is so honored to have a War-criminal’s assurance for his lack of judgment on any key issues important to the real concerns of voters.
Posted by: d0 | October 20, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
folks…Those comment were posted by FREEPERS on the Free Republic!!
It ain’t me. I’m only riding heard on them.
I think Obama should take all the time he can spare and my prayers go out to Mrs. Madelyn Payne Dunham. Godspeed Barack.
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
These “neocons” have killed more Americans than Osama Bin Laden. They and their friends at the NY Times and the Washington Post, et al. should be ostracised, not quoted.
Then, a broken clock might still be right twice a day.
Posted by: Flash Override | October 20, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
“Who cares about Obama’s taking two days off!! There is more IMPORTANT NEWS THAT YOU SHOULD BE REPORTING!”
===================================
Ok, let’s report on:
McCain Employing GOP Operative Accused Of Voter Registration Fraud
Posted by: No problem | October 20, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Ya, come on ML. You are concerned about voter fraud right?
I’m sure you will condemn McCain and his campaign’s attempt to supress votes right?
McCain’s ties to these people must be made known to all the public right?
We cannot allow the MSM to cover this up any longer!
Too funny!
Posted by: Pubs are trying to STEAL the election | October 20, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
I saw Palin in SNL.
In the second skit where she was dancing to the rap, she was really funny and interesting.
She gave us lots of scandal and gosship and laughter from the beginning – Bristol’s pregnancy, Troopergate, Disasterous interview, I will miss her when the election is over.
Posted by: zen | October 20, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Republican “Freedom”
You are free to speak – as long as you are repeating the approved message
You are free to chose your religion – as long as it’s Baptist, Methodist, or Presbiterian
You are free to think – as long as you agree with us
If you fail to correctly understand your “freedoms”, you are obviously a terrorist!
Posted by: GOP = Facism for the 21st century | October 20, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
d0 wrote:
“He is not your Mr. anti-war-ior”
Exactly. Like he said in 2003:
“I don’t oppose all wars.
After September 11th, after witnessing the carnage and destruction, the dust and the tears, I supported this Administration’s pledge to hunt down and root out those who would slaughter innocents in the name of intolerance, and I would willingly take up arms myself to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.
I don’t oppose all wars. And I know that in this crowd today, there is no shortage of patriots, or of patriotism. What I am opposed to is a dumb war. What I am opposed to is a rash war. What I am opposed to is the cynical attempt by Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz and other arm-chair, weekend warriors in this Administration to shove their own ideological agendas down our throats, irrespective of the costs in lives lost and in hardships borne.”
That is why people are voting for him.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 20, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
More and more thinking Republicans are disgusted with McCain’s deplorable behavoir beginning with his Palin choice and culminating with his recent negativism. Adelman has made public what thousands of others intend to do. Good for him. I invite all Republicans to follow Colin Powell and Ken Adelman and vote for Obama. Too much is at stake to ignore the obvious.
Posted by: Marty from Agoura Hills, CA | October 20, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Obama Wants DOJ to Silence McCain-Palin on ACORN.
What a surprise!!
Just the fact that the Obama group would write a letter to the DOJ speaks for itself. Obama wants to shut everyone up who does not agree with him, or that might get the people thinking.. Such as Joe the plumber.
He smirks when you catch him in a lie, and writes letters to quiet those who dare to question his behavior. I question your judgement. Is this what you want in a President?
Posted by: michelle | October 20, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Really they are afraid of Palin being in Washington and exposing them for what they truly are for. Themselves
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
@Michelle
From factcheck.org:
“The McCain-Palin campaign accuses ACORN, a community activist group that operates nationwide, of perpetrating ‘massive voter fraud.’ It says Obama has ‘long and deep’ ties to the group. We find both claims to be exaggerated.”
“Neither ACORN nor its employees have been found guilty of, or even charged with, casting fraudulent votes. What a McCain-Palin Web ad calls ‘voter fraud’ is actually voter registration fraud. Several ACORN canvassers have been found guilty of faking registration forms and others are being investigated. But the evidence that has surfaced so far shows they faked forms to get paid for work they didn’t do, not to stuff ballot boxes.”
Posted by: El_Pajaro | October 20, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
The news is curious today. We hear more ice cracking. It is the crafty neocon who would be positioning himself to hold a position of influence in the next administration. This bettors are laying down for Obama in hopes that they still have time to catch the wave. But wait, did you hear that little news tidbit that almost slipped by unnoticed. Obama’s LAWYER is calling for an investigation of ACORN. Why isn’t anyone wondering exactly WHY DID OBAMA HIRE A PERSONAL LAWYER for this particular topic????????? One can only wonder. We can’t count on the MSM to check it out can we?
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 20, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Well, Repubs – how do you spin this one?
Don’t tell me – Adelman spent the summer on the beach and got a tan, so he’s voting based on skin color, right?
LMFAO
Posted by: Ed from MA | October 20, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
The republican spin???
How about since the election is getting closer and the polls show that Obama has a small lead they want too be sure of favoritism in what they THINK will be the next administration. If the polls were reversed there would be liberals siding with McCain. I put no value to anyone giving endorsements now. I believe them more when they do it early.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Obama took lessons from Hillary on politics. Never admit to anything. Remember Bill” I absolutely did not have sex with Monica Lewinsky”. When accused always accuse the other guy to distract attention away from you. True Liberalism….
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Warming up a crowd in North Carolina Saturday, Republican Rep. Robin Hayes offered the diagnosis that “liberals hate real Americans that work and achieve and believe in God.”
Such comments make one feel that the GOP will be falling apart after McCain’s defeat in November. They have become a party of hate and bitterness. They have become the Grand Old Liability to the American Dream. Many will flee the sinking ship and seek refuge elsewhere.
Posted by: trent | October 20, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
why are you all wondering about obama,
go ahead and make up whatever you want.
you only believe the truth you make up.
so make up a reason why obama hired a lawyer.
If obama called you up himself and said any of you ask me a question, any question you would like.
when he gave you the answer, you would not believe him. so just ask your questions, make up any answer you want.
and it will lead to more questions…and on and on.
you don’t like obama, you don’t want to like obama, you will not be voting for him, so why don’t you spend the rest of this time, trying to find out exactly what john mccain is going to do for you,
other than get your blood pressure up,
and get you fighting mad.
you are done with obama,
ask something of mr. mccain.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Neocons for Obama? They must not have read this information – how about ABC – report this?
Posted by: ObamasSecret | October 20, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
don’t get it, we all know bill did have sex with monica.
will mccain and palin be talking about monica L and bill having sex tomorrow?
why,
lets talk about anything except what john mccain will do for this country.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
ask something of mr. mccain.
The only one who has suggested that you look and study his record is McCain. Obama has not said that once. If he would just provide the Birth Certificate instead of Birth registration maybe he would show some plausibility. Instead it is up to a lawsuit. What is he hoping for. Maybe it is he can change the constitution after he is elected and shown not to be a natural citizen.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
“How about since the election is getting closer and the polls show that Obama has a small lead”
?
A small lead? Obama’s lead in electoral vote is huge.
Obama’s lead in today’s Gallup Daily Tracking Poll is 11 points.
Today’s Suffolk poll on Ohio shows a 9 point lead for Obama.
Rasmussen today tells us that Obama opens his biggest lead in Virgina so far, 10 points.
Obama is ahead in ALL the swing states that McCain MUST win.
Etc.
This race is over.
Posted by: pollster | October 20, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Pollster, yeah and polls had Gore & Kerry ahead too.
How did that turn out?
Lol.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
There are still a huge number of undecideds out there.
And trust me, if someone is still undecided, in other words hasn’t been swayed by the Messiah by now….then they aren’t going to be.
Undecideds will go to McCain. Get use to it. And try not to fall apart this time, okay?!
;-)
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Adelman is the one who said Iraq would be a cakewalk.
Ha! Obama is welcome to him!
Lol.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
you all have been yelling so loud for birth certificates and such, you missed it months ago. obama not only told everyone to examine his plans for getting this country out of this mess, he has been on the campaign trail talking about what he will do and how he will pay for it.
while mccain has been talking about bill ayers, and such. (financially bill ayers will do better under mccain plan. and joe the plumber will be bettter with obama.)
obama has told us what he will do to help the country. mccain has been telling us about bill ayers.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
B.O.B
What it is is the way to run a political campaign. When accused of something never admit to it or even talk about it. Instead accuse the opponenet of something to distract the heat away from you. Like Obama always trying to connect McCain to Bush because of Bush’s popularity. Should we connect Obama to Clinton because they were both democrats.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
B.O.B.
Yes because Obama’s relationship with Bill Ayers speaks volumes about what Obmama will do for this country.
And trust me, we need to know.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Obama has managed to fool a lot that he’s a moderate.
Obama is anything BUT a moderate, and all you need to do is look at his past activist history and relationships to know he’s as far left as one can get.
And the only reason you’re being fooled is the media isn’t doing it’s job.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Hillary as senator about Bush not wanting to turn over documents. Hillary did the same about travelgate documents. Just use the same standard for all
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
As voters have gotten to know Senator Barack Obama, they have warmed up to him, with more than half, 53 percent, now saying they have a favorable impression of him and 33 percent saying they have an unfavorable view. But as voters have gotten to know Senator John McCain, they have not warmed, with only 36 percent of voters saying they view him favorably while 45 percent view him unfavorably.
Even voters who are planning to vote for McCain say their enthusiasm has waned. In New York Times and CBS News polls conducted with the same respondents before the first presidential debate and again after the last debate, McCain made no progress in appealing to voters on a personal level, and he and his running mate, Governor Sarah Palin, had alienated some voters.
Personal appeal is an intangible element in voters’ decisions. Each voter has a personal reason for connecting with a candidate or not. But the percentage of those who hold a favorable opinion of Obama is up 10 points since last month. Opinion of Senator Joseph Biden Jr., Obama’s running mate, is also up, to 50 percent last weekend from 36 percent in September.
In contrast, favorable opinion of McCain remained stable, and unfavorable opinion rose to 45 percent now from 35 percent in September. Palin’s negatives are up, to 41 percent now from 29 percent in September.
Obama’s favorability is the highest for a presidential candidate running for a first term in the last 28 years of Times/CBS polls. Palin’s negative rating is the highest for a vice-presidential candidate as measured by The Times and CBS News. Even Dan Quayle, with whom Palin is often compared because of her age and inexperience on the national scene, was not viewed as negatively in the 1988 campaign.
Posted by: paling | October 20, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
The biggest shock in the world will be on the democrat party’s faces as they watch the election returns.
McCain will win, and you will wonder where it all went so wrong.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
99.9% of the media is a cheerleading squad for Obama.
The economy is in shambles.
The current president is unpopular.
McCain is an old man.
The Iraq was is unpopular.
George Soros has provided MILLIONS to Obama.
And Obama STILL cannot close the deal. In many state races he’s STILL not at 50%.
What does that tell you? Obama is one of the weakest candidates ever put forth by the democrat party.
In a year where it’s virtually impossible for a democrat to lose an election, Obama is sweating it out till the end.
WOW.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Mara, spare us your righteous indignation.
The Huffington Post and Daily Kos, the two most POPULAR blogs supporting Obama are so vile they have to shut down comments when people like Tony Snow and Robert Novak announced their illnesses.
Nice try though. The evil is your side, and don’t you forget it.
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Oh wait Mara, I take it back.
Huffington Post shuts down the comments section so the public won’t see how nasty the Obama supporters are.
Daily Kos doesn’t shut them down, they’re actually quite proud of being evil people.
Just to clarify……
;-)
Posted by: Jo | October 20, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
examine his plans for getting this country out of this mess, he has been on the campaign trail talking about what he will do and how he will pay for it.
How did he say he will pay for it??????
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Jo: “Pollster, yeah and polls had Gore & Kerry ahead too.”
That fantasy may comfort you, but it’s a fantasy.
Just one example. A CBS poll from September 23, 2004, so late in the Bush/Kerry race. CBS’s findings:
“The nationwide vote for President remains largely as it was last week: President Bush holds an eight-point lead over John Kerry in this poll. Last week, he was up by nine points. Among likely voters — those deemed the most probable to turn out in November — the President holds a similar 51 percent to 42 percent lead.”
A VERY different picture from what we have now. VERY different as well:
“Most voters believe this campaign has so far been marred by unfair, negative attacks. While both sides share blame, Senator John Kerry is more often seen as the one doing that attacking.”
See – all the tables have turned in 2008.
Posted by: pollster | October 20, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
I have noticed something very disturbing about Mr. Obama and his campaign over the past year especially since the NH primary. When he lost the primary in NH it was a shocker and the Obama resopnse was to cast Bill Clinton as a racist. Then in Ohio when Hillary was told a story about a woman who was denied health care at a local clinic and her baby later died, Mr. Obama and his surrogates invistigated the sheriff and the mother and declared that they were lying.She was hounded by the press at the same time she was still mourning her lose. The media and Obama got it wrong, she was denied treatment but not at the hospital that was mentioned it was at a clinic owned by the hospital. When a woman in Pa said that she supported Hillary and not Obama in a campaign commerical she was investigated. When a woman in PA ask a question during the ABC debate as to why Mr. Obama did not wear a flag pin and that his not doing so bothered he she too soon meet the rath of Obama. She was investigated and all of her personal life was fair game for Mr. Obama and the media.
I write this because something clicked when I saw how Mr. Obama and company treate the now famous “Joe the Plumber”. Mr. Obama goes to his neighborhood and crosses the street to meet him and when he ask Mr. Obama question that he does not like the Obama dogs are sent to smell him out and his whole life is put up for public ridicule. The lesson is clear if one goes against the Great Obama then Obama will use all the resources at his disposal to destrory them. The problem is he may soon have the resources of the Federal Government at his disposal in his efforts to quite his critics.
Posted by: russell | October 20, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
jo,
no it does not. not for you, you don’t believe what obama tell you he will do for you and yours to your face.
obama told you during the last debate what his relationship was with bill ayers,
mccain said he did not care about an old washed up terroist.
so why are you letting mccain get away with telling you about an old washed up terroist, instead of insisting that he tell you exactly what he will do differently, from bush about this economy.
obama is giving volumes about what he will do for this country, all of us.
but mccain and palin know you all don’t really care about the issues, that is why they are not talking about them to you.
mccain is the one who is happy to tell you all anything you want to hear to get your vote. if he started talking about his non ideas on the issues, he would lose you.
all he has to offer you his followers is bill ayers, and birth certificate,
and he his glad you don’t ask anything more from him.
mccain satisfying you his followers with ayers, and such maybe alright,
but he will never win the wh, and he cannot run the country on such.
did any of you notice that mccain and palin were floundering, all the talk about them was about the hate talk coming out of their rally’s.
until joe the plumber came along, and said the word socialism- and now mccain, the rep. party nominee for president and his vp pick sarah palin and co. are taking their talking points from joe. Which shows mccain will do ANYTHING and say ANYTHING to try to win.
only in america
god, we live in a great country,
Don’t we?
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
That’s right Jo,
Obama’s so worried that he’s gonna throw money at the down ticket to get a filibuster-proof Senate too.
Oh, yeah, Worried…that’s the ticket>
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Jo – or whoever you are – it’s not about righteous indignation. It’s about basic human decency. If you are raised with it – the way Obama was, you get it. If you weren’t – you never will. A candidate’s grandmother is dying. You either do not have the maturity or the decency to respond as a dignified human being. Many McCain supporters have sent their hopes, their sympathy and their prayer – from ordinary Americans to leaders. The rest of you are the real McCain supporters.
Posted by: mara | October 20, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Why is ABC News lying about the polls on their World News telecast? They are trying to give the impression that Obama is pulling ahead of McCain when in fact the race is tightening up. Stephanopoulus is the chief culprit. His journalistic objectivity is long gone. It is time for George to go back into politics and leave journalism, such as it is, to the journalists.
Posted by: jcarob | October 20, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
pollster,
thanks for reminding. Interesting figures. Bush led Kerry by a 9 point margin at the end of September 2004… he WON the the election, but only by 2,4 point margin.
Posted by: kurt | October 20, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
“if you are a supporter of john mccain, i’ll remember you and you absolute lack of humanity whenever i think of mccain.
Posted by: mara | Oct 20, 2008 11:01:38 PM
____________________________
This is the grandma who supported and raised Obama , the one he referred to as a”typical white woman”, the one he tossed under the bus……
How kind of him to see her off on her final journey!
I admire her.
There are many like her in today’s world, left to take up the slack in the family when someone else is unable to do so.
Shalom.
My vote still will go to:
MCCAIN AND PALIN
Posted by: Marketing | October 20, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
ObamaSecret
Yup, FactCheck is part of Annenberg. Leonore Annenberg, widow of Walter, is the Foundation President.
They are so “in the tank” for Obama.
Guess who Leonore endorsed:
MCCAIN
Look it up, even McCain was excited about it. It’s on his website.
Nice try though.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 20, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
“They are trying to give the impression that Obama is pulling ahead of McCain when in fact the race is tightening up.”
Well, it isn’t. The gap is only widening. See what’s happening in the states, see Obama’s 11 point lead today in the Gallup daily tracking poll.
Posted by: shovel | October 20, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
My husband said he is so turned off to Obama because of his arrogance and sense of entitlement….that look down his nose at you attitude.
NO BAMA, NO MATTER WHAT HILLARY TELLS ME.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN
Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 20, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
McCain’s pullin out of Co, Nev and Ia. Bankin on covering it all with PA…but 12 pts back there.
Can you spell L O S E R?
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Neocons hate McCain. They have a pipe dream that if Obama is elected he’ll do such a terrible job that in 4 years Americans will be running to the Neocons. No matter what happens in this election, their day is the sun has ended. Hope they pocketed enough money off of the Iraq war to sustain them.
Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
So now Adelman has jumped off the sinking McCain ship.
WHO’S NEXT TO ENDORSE OBAMA?
MY MONEY IS ON DAVID BROOKS.
THE ORACLE HAS SPOKEN
Posted by: Ed from MA | October 20, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
A vet,
I am sorry, i missed your post to me.
to answer what you were saying to me.
John “I supported bush 90% of the time, more than any other senator” Mccain can no more seperate himself from bush on this economy deal- than starch from potatoes. on the economy, the war and everything else bush.
and if I were obama, I would be trying my best to connect myself with the bill clinton years of the economy, I could live with that, my wallet would love that.
at least I had a wallet during the clinton years, now i am thinking about putting what little money i have left in my mattress.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
The far right neo-con world and right wing Republicans are now involved in a ‘scorched earth’ policy in America. If they can’t win they will cause as much damage to the country above and beyond what they already have done for the last 8 years.
Even long time conservatives who now dare to express an independent thought get hate mail and are vilified. There is no room in the Republican party for anything except the party line. Another clear example of how they’re so ‘open’ to ‘reaching across the aisle’.
As far as Adelman goes, his opinion will always be suspect, regardless of the subject.
Posted by: Blue | October 20, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Polls are all over the place depending on what you want to believe. The only one that matters is on ll/4, and it’s too far away to know. Obama is ahead in three and McCain in two (swing states) and only by a few points. Wierd as BO has 605 million to play with and McCain has only 87 million, BECAUSE HE STUCK TO THE RULES….YOU CAN COUNT ON HIS WORD…..BO, not so much.
Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 20, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Jo they all said it would be a cakewalk GWB the VP rummy and Mccain shows Mccains Judgement I say
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | October 20, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
David Brooks already pretty much has I mean have you read him on Sarah palin pick
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | October 20, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Obama’s throwin money at the down ticket to get a filibuster-proof Senate. He’s a fund raising juggernaut!!
D.C.’s gonna look good in blue baby! Gonna take that to fix 8 years of GOP screw-ups.
Posted by: Bob | October 20, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
marketing,
has she passed on?
I was raised by my grandmother,
God lov ‘em.
yes, peace to her and her family.
marketing,-i am glad you are voting for mccain.
—-just one last word to you marketing,
you know we are going to beat you all in nov. :)
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
” The problem is he may soon have the resources of the Federal Government at his disposal in his efforts to quite his critics.”
Posted by: russell | Oct 20, 2008 11:12:38 PM
___________________
Yhat reminds me of still another Obama story.
A delegate in Chicago was watching a group of kids climbing her tree.
She made a (horrors!) politically incorrect comment.
She described them as a “pack of monkeys”.
I disremember whether or not theye were a racially motley crew or not; The delegate was Mexican.
She was hounded by Obama’s followers into giving up that title.
I have called my kids a pack of monkeys many times…..
What’s the big deal?
Is this the kind of changes Obama plans on bringing us?
Posted by: Just thinking | October 20, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
“D.C.’s gonna look good in blue baby! Gonna take that to fix 8 years of GOP screw-ups.”
They’ve had a 2 year head start and Pelosi & co have failed miserably on all accounts. We’re doomed with Obama, Pelosi, Schumer, Rangel, Reid and Franks at the helm. Say hello to double digit unemployment.
Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
hope, change, hate?,
Those just don’t seem to go together unless you meant I hope my hate change(s).
Really, the things people waste their hatred on is incredible. THIS IS NOT REAL, IT’S POLITICS!
What about the divisive hateful McCain campaign? I don’t see the lovely Hillary Clinton condoning that. Not even with a wink and a nod.
Learn from your hero, grace counts!
Posted by: val | October 20, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Hope, Change, Hate,…..Arrogance and sense of entitlement? I don’t see that at all in Obama. I see intelligence, organization, good judgment, steadiness. It would seem your husband is going to vote for someone not based on really important qualifications and qualities but some subjective opinions. Not very smart. So, if you think McCain’s bouncing around and changing his mind from one opinion to another day by day and judgment in picking a vice-president who knows nothing, has been confidence-inspiring to you, I’d say you guys are living on another planet. The thought of McCain and Palin running this country sends chills of fear through me. They are talking “socialism” nonsense but I worry about fascism rearing its ugly head under their administration. But you go ahead and base and waste your valuable votes on the old man who sometimes doesn’t know which end is up, and the woman who thinks she knows foreign policy because she can see Russia from her house. What a joke! What an insult to the intelligence of the people of this country.
Posted by: counting crows | October 20, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Nobody cares about Ken Adelman.
Many millions of Americans care about Colin Powell though.
Powell dealt McCain, Palin and the GOP a blow they’ll not recover from before Election Day. Because he analyzed, argumented and had it all right.
Posted by: jim | October 20, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
yes, david brooks (whom I admire, much-i watch the news hour, and love him with mark shields) seemed to leaning to obama, after the second debate.
but I don’t trust these neocons,
as a dem, a hillary supporter, still supporting hillary in her support for obama, if i were in the obama camp, i would hold the neocons endorsement connected with a ten foot pole.
—-
but, can you blame them for jumping ship.
mccain, being a military man should have been calling Mayday! Mayday! in re to his campaign, but instead he grabbed the wheel and is planning to go down with the STT- Straight Talk Titanic
with all of his passengers yelling
bill ayers, birth certificate, socialist, and joe the plumber and
bubble,bubble, bubble…
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
hope change hate I guess you missed when Mccains campaign said he raised almost as much as Obama in july something like 26 million and 47 mil. in august and got 10 mil the days after the convention the 87 million is what he got from public finc. he was entitled to Obama chose not to he broke NO laws or rules only fund raising records for dollars and number of doners
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | October 20, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
David Brooks worships Barack Obama’s sharp intellect and steady temperament.
No doubt he will vote for him.
Posted by: fred | October 20, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Just Thinking: Did you notice the story that ABC and company ran with I think it went the whole day on their website. It was about some guy who put out a coupon or something that had Obama on it with the picture of chicken and watermellon and koolaid and the Obama attack dogs and liberal blogers were up in arms about how he was sterotyping blacks. I don’t have a problem with their depiction but not a word was said when JT described the food that Mr. Obama and friends ordered in NC this weekend. According to JT it included chicken, collard greens. Well if some one else had described the menu then they would be labeled a racist.
Posted by: russell | October 20, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Mack – It’s really hard to get things done when the republicans filibuster every bill you try to get passed, and when they don’t filibuster the president vetoes everything you send his way. Not Pelosi’s or Reid’s fault. Some people think this “division of power” is the way to go. I think the “division of power” is the way to get nothing done. The democrats need to be in charge for a change. They couldn’t be worse than the past eight years, and indeed, they’ll be much better.
Posted by: counting crows | October 20, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Don,
I hope your anger will not prevent you from seeing Obama when he i in your fair state.
Aloha.
Posted by: friend | October 20, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
” What a joke! What an insult to the intelligence of the people of this country.”
Oh please. A jr Senator who Hillary and Biden both said didn’t have enough experience to run this country is not the answer. He is a bull artist that has done absolutely nothing except talk. Look at his old district in Chicago for a point of reference. People have to be either desperate or stupid to vote for that one.
Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
B.O.B. Let me do a little research so I can answer with facts instead of opinion on the Clinton years and the 90% voting with Bush. I will say that yes Bush has made mistakes as have all Presidents. When confronted with the juggernaut of the democrats the last 2 years especially in their effort to get the white house it wouldn’t have mattered who was the republican president and what he would have done it would have been wrong. Bush had a approval rating of 38% and I agree it wasn’t good. The democratic congress had an approval rating of single digits for awhile and still is less than Bush.
I will do more research and look for you tomorrow.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
“Mack – It’s really hard to get things done when the republicans filibuster every bill you try to get passed, ”
What in the world will Pelosi, Reid, Franks etc. get done? A bunch of partisan bumbling idiots.
Posted by: Mack | October 20, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
David Brooks caught the fungus. There’s no hope for him. Soon his charade as conservative commentator will be obvious to even the dullest tool and he will have to reinvent himself as an enlightened left of center talking head. Maybe Mark Shields, who is getting a little long in the tooth, will cede his chair on Lehrer’s show to Brooks and then they can get a real conservative to play Brooks’ role. The good news is that Brooks will not have to worry about catching the fungus from Shields.
Posted by: jcarob | October 20, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
First let me say my prayers go out the Obama family,but I have to also say that there are people out there that are really showing how easy it is to brainwashed by Limbaugh the perscription writing drug addict who sits on his big fat butt and keeps his fans revved up and full of hate,he and Hannity should both be running McCains campaign,they are so full of hot air .
Posted by: damehen | October 20, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Powell dealt McCain, Palin and the GOP a blow they’ll not recover from before Election Day. Because he analyzed, argumented and had it all right.
Unfortunately many will simply look at color and decide that was really the reason. This is the first candidate to run for president that is black. Do you not think that most if not all blacks will support him for that reason alone? I have seen in North Carolina Obama campaigners who were black only asking blacks instead of all if they were registered to vote. I think most blacks will vote for Obama, whites will be mixed. Who does that make a racist, the white man???????
Posted by: A Veteran | October 20, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Obama’s lead is much more solid than Al Gore’s was in 2000.
Here’s from October 4, 2000:
“A Washington Post/ABC survey showed Mr Gore with a narrow lead, 48% to 46%, while the latest Gallup/CNN tracking poll had the two men all square on 45% each.”
Here’s from October 29, 2000:
“GOP presidential candidate Texas Gov. George W. Bush continued to maintain an advantage over Democratic Vice President Al Gore in Sunday’s CNN/USA Today/Gallup tracking poll.
Forty-nine percent of respondents said they supported Bush while 42 percent said they would vote for Gore, no change at all from Saturday’s poll.”
Bush had a 7 point LEAD over Gore at the end of October 2000. GOP spinners now say that Gore was way ahead in the polls… LOL.
Now compare such numbers to what we have in 2008.
Our next POTUS will be Barack Obama.
Posted by: Utah | October 20, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
2012 Republican ticket:
Palin & Bobby Jindal
running on the ‘we have the real god and the real americans’ platform. political rally’s will consist of speaking in tongues, exorcisms with special witch hunts.
Posted by: Blue | October 20, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
thanks,
but the 90% voting-straight from mccains mouth. just google it and you can probally see the footage.
i believe it is historic to put the sitting presidents face on the economy,
good or bad,
hence-for me the clinton years were good.-i probally could have done a little better.
with w. bush’-thank god, we made a few good decisions before all of this hit.
so, i think we will be ok.
i feel for some of my fellow american.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 20, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
a SARAH PALIN / MICHELE BACHMANN ticket…
just think of it…
it would leave even the pundits speechless…
so -
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!
WHAT A BRIGHT FUTURE FOR THE GOP!
Posted by: germaine | October 21, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
How come nobody ever mentions America’s very first President?
Posted by: Just thinking | October 21, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
One of my problems is the lead up to the actual campaign. McCain basically breezed through the primaries with a party he had definately pissed off during the years as senator. The democrats waged a battle royal all the way through. Hillary and Dean and whoever supporters said that Obama wasn’t the man to lead the country etc etc. Then because he needs the votes of Hillarys supporters he makes a deal to pay off the 13 million she owes if she campaigns for Obama. How does that lead to proper voting if Hillary is only doing it for the money????? Gets confusing doesn’t it???
Posted by: A Veteran | October 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
blue, i think you are right except it will be jindal/palin-
and i will tell you why i think so,
because palin’ intro to the country was
and will be seen as a brilliant politcal stunt that backfired on mccain.
and because snl has almost made a cartoon character of her, and because since being so partisian on the national ticket, her clout in alaska is drying up.the whole working with both parties bit.
over the next four years palin is going to have to do something spectacular to keep her name in all of the public eye.
not just the rep. base. popularity alone will not join the rep. party back together.
jindal on the other hand, was seen as a serious contender, he has the whole of rebuilding new orleans and the rest of his state going for him.
because they are in a rebuilding state already, and there are so many eyes on la. the serious of the rep. party will help to groom him, for his across the board appeal with the party.
a jindal/palin vs. obama/clinton
would be to much for the heart to stand.
i don’t even want to think about it.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
evem as a dem. jindal would have been my pick this time around for mccain.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 21, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I don’t think winning the title as “The Most Liberal’ in 2007 is a title that I would have liked to have won. How does you new title sound Obama?
Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 21, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Why do you ignore Warren Harding?
Posted by: Just thinking | October 21, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Who’s next?
Levi Johnston.
Posted by: keaton | October 21, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
helping to retire your opponents debt did not start with obama and clinton.
it has been common practice for many years.
i don’t like it, it just makes you wonder. well, what was all of that about?
—-
and germaine,
palin/michelle b.? would have a better chance of winning the moon, than the wh.
michelle b. will probally have some type of slap on the hand. and i would not be suprised if this is not the beginning of the end of her political career. I have never cared much for chris matthews, and even less now
(sorry, still a little bitterness from the hillary campaign) but he had her stitched up every way.
she would have been better to just pretend she could not hear him, and give a deer in the headlight look.
no cred. to her at all.
Posted by: B.O.B. | October 21, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Palin is political toast and kudos to McCain for burning her so soon.
She’s be exposed as an ambitiious but idiotic political climber too dumb to even know she was commiting political suicide. She’s tumbling in Alaskan polls with one ethics abuse finding and another one pending. She, Todd, her staff and alaska all are being sued for multi-millions by Wooten and Monegan that the ethics report all but inisures they’ll win. Hell, she won’t even have the Lake Lucille house when this is over.
Palin is TOAST!
Posted by: Bob | October 21, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
OxyCon,
I am going to make a statement that no one wants to admit. THE SURGE WILL EVENTUALLY FAIL. All you have to do is look at history and realize that when a superior military force invades a country and try to impose their own brand of socio-political agenda, it is doomed to eventually fail the moment that military force leave. We may be more concerned about saving face than wether there is failure for waging an illegal war (that’s another matter).
Futhermore, Al Qaeda was never in Iraq (now they are thanks to the US army) and they never would have been because Sadam hated Al Qaeda and would not have anything to do with them… look it up! So your rehtoric does not hold water. Get the US boys out of there and let these brigands settle their own affairs. Unfortunately, don’t worry you’ll have plenty of dead Americans to celebrate as war heroes, because Senator Obama will not be able to let them leave until we secure our supply of oil and move to an alternative energy source and that will take another ten years. We have been put on this roller coaster and we have to ride it out until the end ot he course.
Posted by: Prometheus | October 21, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
B.O.B.
depending on the results of the ongoing investigations in Alaska of Palin et. al. she might have a problem retaining her position as Gov.
and, for whatever possible reason Biden might not run in 2012, Clinton will be having far to much ‘fun’ in the senate to give up that position… She is needed there and it’s there where she can do the most good.
you are right tho’, if it was a jindal/palin vs. obama/clinton in 2012,
Posted by: Blue | October 21, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Prometheus
from what I’ve read another possible reason for the ‘surge’ facing future difficulties, is that when the great amounts of monies (bribes) stop being paid out to the various sides, there will be no incentive to continue to ‘get along’ when US troops are pulled out of the urban areas.
we can only hope that Obama will get our troops out of Iraq ASAP…….
Posted by: Blue | October 21, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Biden basically admitted that Obama is inexperienced and America’s enemies are going to test him. Funny ABCNEWS is silent on that.
Posted by: Greg h | October 21, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
we can only hope that Obama will get our troops out of Iraq ASAP…….
Posted by: Blue | Oct 21, 2008 12:33:09 AM
________
Oh he would…… just before he sent them all into Afghanistan!
Posted by: Questioner | October 21, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
I am very Touched to here the Illness of Sen.Barrack Obama’s Grand Ma.I PRAY&BELIEVE she will Overcome.We fellow AMERICANS are all SAD to hear such BAD NEWS,We would love Mrs.Dunham to see Her grand sons Victory for the President of the U.S.A.May the Dear Lord Protect and give a Quick recovery to Mr.s Dunham & give courage and Stength to all Sen.Barrack Obama’s Family.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: Lina Yona | October 21, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
russell 11:12:38 You are so right. Last month it was the Missouri truth squad. I believe Claire McCaskill instigated this. A reporter from channel 4 broke the story that St. Louis prosecutor Jennifer Joyce and county prosecutor Bob McCullough(spelling?)-both Democrats-had formed a group including other law enforcement officials throughout Missouri to seek out people they thought were spreading lies about Obama. When asked if they would be interested in someone’s bumper sticker about Obama the answer was yes. The reporter later “revised” his story to the disbelief of a local radio talk show host who had the clips. This is scary stuff.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 21, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
There seems to be much fear of the gentle lady from Alaska. The Obama lunatic fringe has been worked into a frenzy. The sane among us look at you loonies and wonder what you could possibly be imagining. What is responsible for all this conflicted testimony? Really, you need to read with a modicum of objectivity some of the invective you are hurling at Gov. Palin and see all the inherent contradictions and hypocrisy. The few among you who can make that jump will be astounded.
Posted by: jcarob | October 21, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
GOP RIP -
Michelle Bachman’s now denying that she questioned Obama’s patriotism or asked the media to investigate the Congress to identify “anti-American” members. Those of us who saw say these things must have been experiencing some kind of mass hallucination.
It’s kind of like Palin being gratified that she’d not been found guilty of ethics violations after she’d been found guilty of ethics violations.
As the Red Queen said in Alice in Wonderland, “I believe at least six impossible things before breakfast.”
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 21, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
WHERE IS THE MEDIA ON THIS??? Do we need a president who is forgetful and forgotten by his campaign aides? JOHN MCCAIN was abandoned and forgotten in his campaign bus after his rally in PA. He spent the night in the bus and was rescued the following morning by two passersby. check at http://www.theonion.com
JOHN MCCAIN’s campaign sought contribution from the Russian Ambassador at the UN. Mccain’s campaign wrote a letter to Vitaly Churkin asking him to contribute from between 35 – 5000dollars, but Vitaly rejected stating that “russian gov’t officials do not support campaigns” this is the tough talk on russia right? the GOP campaign is on fire.
Posted by: 002186 | October 21, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am
Cynthia McKinney is the Green Party candidate. Any coverage of her, ABC?
Posted by: raven | October 21, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
I don’t have to tell anyone what the term neocon means or how widely it was used in the same sentences with Bush and usually with some very “choice ” language. So a “neocon” teaming up with the Democrat party is just wonderful!
Posted by: david | October 21, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Raven,for what honestly…
Posted by: David Jay | October 21, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
raven…Google “irrelevant”.
Posted by: Hokie Freak | October 21, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
All Neo-Cons should vote for Obama. They believe in a New World Order and Obama is their best hope of that.
Posted by: marylou | October 21, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Joe Biden, Colin Powell, and Madeleine Albright are all three “predicting a crisis” if Obama is selected. Of course some of you brainwashed fools will accept whatever the news tells you.
Investigate ___.
___ Truth Now.
___ Was An Inside Job.
In an Emergency Dial ___.
Posted by: joefortruth | October 21, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I find it so incredibly telling that some profess Obama to be part of some “New World Order” or that he’s tied to Neo-Cons (another Right-Wing reverse psychology smear). The TRUTH is that the ship is sinking and the rats are trying to get a seat on the life raft called Obama. There’s no great mystery here. Obama equals a paradigm shift in governance. Those in the far Right that see it coming are trying not to look like they’ve got excrement all over them.
Posted by: Denny | October 21, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
It’s more like this
Community Organizer,or Member of PTA
State Senator, or small town Mayor
US Senator, or Governor
Visionary and Understands the world, or
makes a good subject for SNL
Posted by: Hopeful Independent | October 21, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
I’ve noticed Obama’s position changing from Dove to Hawk. That is essentially all I have to say. Draw your own conclusions. As for abandoning McCain, Adelman is not a conservative. A neo-con is not a conservative. A neo-con is a hawkish, foreign interventionist, liberal interested in empire. Not a conservative at all.
Posted by: Bobby | October 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
he said invasion would be cakewalk
and why, it was
it was the occupaiton that was not easy
Posted by: nick | October 21, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Obama genuflecting at AIPAC over invading Iran gave Adelman the “necessary” qualifications he looks for in a presidential candidate.
Simple, and as sinister, as that.
Posted by: farang | October 22, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Here’s my Cockeyed, but On Target Election 2008 Syllogism.
Premise – Neocons Don’t Like Sarah Palin
Antithesis – Liberals Hate Sarah Palin
Conclusion – Sarah Palin for President!
And this from a committed Independent tired of being bullied by the Liberal-Left-Neocon Leviathan.
Posted by: Dedalus | October 22, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
1,100+ murders just in Juarez alone this year so far… More than all Iraq soldier casualties in 2007.
Iraq? I’m terrified of armed Mexicans.
And McCain “says” he’ll secure the border before revamping immigration, whereas Barky favors legalizing most illegal aliens…
Meanwhile, not a peep about “immigration” from either candidate on the campaign trail.
I’m just sayin’…
Posted by: jtr | October 22, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm