By Lee Speigel

Oct 9, 2008 9:11pm

Obama: I Assumed Ayers Had Been Rehabilitated

In an interview with conservative Philadelphia radio talk show host Michael Smerconish today, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said his relationship with William Ayers is being questioned and his middle name is being invoked at events for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to distract voters from the economy.

You can listen to the audio HERE, courtesy of Politico.

"This is a red herring," Obama said of the Ayers story," because people don’t want to talk about the fact that economy over the last eight years has been mismanaged to the point that we’re teetering on a really, really bad situation.

Smerconish asked about the myriad Republicans at McCain-Palin events this week who referred to "Barack Hussein Obama."

"I don’t think there’s any secret about this," Obama said. "My father was from Kenya so I’ve got an Arab-sounding name, and I think most people know that I was raised by my mom who was from Kansas, which is why I’ve got a Kansas-sounding accent…When people are purposely doing this in connection with a theme the McCain campaign’s decided they want to pursue in the past few weeks, which is to go after me personally, in some pretty aggressive ways, then, you know they’re trying to distract from the economy."

"We’ve got the biggest economic crisis on our hands since the Great Depression," Obama said, "and Senator McCain’s team has said in the newspapers, they’ve said it publicly, ‘If we talk about the economy, then we lose the election,’" Obama said.

Smerconish said his callers wanted to know about Obama’s trip to Ayers’ home in 1995 to discuss his pending state senate run: why go to his house to begin with?

"I moved to Chicago," Obama recalled. "I didn’t grow up in Chicago. And graduating from law school I was involved in a whole bunch of civic activities.

"The gentleman in question, Bill Ayers, is a college professor, teaches education at the University of Illinois and that’s how I met him, was working on a school reform project that was funded by an ambassador and former close friend of Ronald Reagan’s and I was sitting on this board along with a whole bunch of conservative businessmen and civic leaders and he was one of the people who was on this board. And he lives in the same neighborhood.

"Ultimately, I ended up learning about the fact that he had engaged in this reprehensible act 40 years ago, but I was eight years old at the time and I assumed that he had been rehabilitated.

"So, you know, the central point this is not somebody who advises my campaign, it’s not somebody who is part of my, you know, inner circle in any way. This is somebody I’ve worked on some projects with, the latest is school reform. And I’ve strongly condemned his actions.

"The fact that, you know, Senator McCain wants to make this the centerpiece of his campaign is pretty remarkable," Obama said. "I mean, we are going through an enormous challenge right now. And Senator McCain surely doesn’t believe that I endorse any of the actions that [Ayers] has taken….Nobody is suggesting that in any way that I think the actions this radical group back in the 60s did was the right thing to do. This is just a political tactic…

"One of the problems with being in public life is you end up knowing all sorts of people," Obama said. "And you’re not going to do a vet or an investigation on every single one of them."

Hat tip to Ben Smith.

- jpt

User Comments

Again Obama goes to a conservative media outlet to take questions and make his case to conservatives.
McCain also should be commended for going before the liberal leaning Des Moines Register editorial board.
Which brings me to Sarah Palin who has yet to do a press conference let alone sit down for an interview with liberal media.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 9, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Didn’t the Stock Market drop nearly 700 points?
Why are we talking about Ayers?

Posted by: Carrie | October 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Who cares?? Our economy is in the tank and all McCain wants to talk about is who knows whom? Please tell me we can get back to what Americans really care about—preserving our way of life and saving our economy!

Posted by: RC | October 9, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Obama’s excuse now is that he thought Ayers had been rehabilitated. But why, then, did he describe Obama as “just a guy I knew in the neighborhood?” That’s what he said when confronted on the issue by Stephanapulous. That was a flat out lie. He worked closely with Ayers on the Annenberg Challenge. And Obama never spoke about the Annenberg Challenge when he began running for President, though he listed it as executive experience when he was running against Bobby Rush. And that was his main executive experience. He’s acted like the job did not exist.

Posted by: katmandu | October 9, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Why isn’t the mainstream media agressively reporting the increasingly frightening tone of the McCain / Palin rallies? These candidates are deliberately stoking fear, hatred and threats of violence.

Posted by: Wiscon108 | October 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Again, another lie by Obama. He knew then and know now just what Bill Ayers did and what he stands for. Once a terrorist, always a terrorist. Once a murderer, always a murderer. Once a liar, always a liar…Obama can not help being a liar. It is in his jens from both his father and mother. Both were misfits.

Posted by: Marla | October 9, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

i lost half of my 401k this week and Mcbush/ pollin want to try to make a big deal out of this, bull#$%&.Seem’s to me they are grasping at straw’s.Whatever integriety Mcbush had before this election,is gone . I think he sold his soul to the devil.

Posted by: Paul Oligschlaeger | October 9, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Obama has had several different versions of his relationship with Ayres. He’s never admitted anything without being forced to, because his previous statements were found untrue.
Obama’s work on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge is worth a look. It isn’t a distraction- this man wants to be President and says he will go through the budget and cut programs we don’t need.
Well, let’s have a look at how he spent money as an executive for the CAC board.
He gave plenty to ACORN, and plenty to Mike Klonsky, one of Ayre’s college radical buddies.
Obama has not been forthcoming for good reason. Call him on it. Investigate it.
Then let the voters decide.

Posted by: MayBee | October 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Here we go with Obama changing hi story multiple times again.

Posted by: geevill | October 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Rehabilitated? Who is this liar trying to kid? Would you, in any way, shape or form, associate with someone who bombed the Pentagon or belonged to a group who killed a Police Officer? I wouldn’t and I wont vote for someone who has and is lying about it. I’m a Hillary supporter voting for McCain!

Posted by: NubTail | October 9, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Wiscon108,
I absolutely agree. The rhetoric coming out of the McCain camp is dangerous. They have people at rallies stating “off with his head” in reference to Obama.
McCain and Palin can target the Ayers association but there must be a limit when you have supporters threating the life of Obama.
It’s dangerous. And considering the polls… it’s not working. Obama still leads by a hefty margin.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Well if the McCain supporters want to get in the gutter, I’m sure they’ll be delighted to tell us all about Keating, Liddy, Brickner, the treasonous Alaska Independence Party and all the other unsavory characters in McCain’s and Palin’s past. And there are a LOT more of them on that side of the ledger.
I suspect the voters are going to laugh this off, though. McCain/Palin will rile up some of the most ignorant, bigoted members of their far-Right base (the ones yelling “Kill him”, “Terrorist” and “Sit down, boy”, but the majority of Americans are decent people who don’t approve of this kind of hate speech.

Posted by: Reality-based | October 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

There he goes again. Another story about Ayers!! Obama stop lying, you digging a bigger hole…

Posted by: blksister | October 9, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Ayers bothers me a bit, well more than a bit, Ayers was and is a kid of privelege but what really bugs me is that Obama supposedly had a rough time of it , mother sick, on food stamps etc. Yet he finds the money to attend some pretty expensive schools, took a trip with a drug taking Pakistani friend to Pakistan. No one seems to know him from Columbia, did he bag groceries for spending money, did he tutor others and why or how did he gain entry to Harvard, who sponsored him and why. We have heard it was via a Saudi Billionaire or someone with ties to the Saudi. Looks like he would show his grades and fess up as to how he got to where he is at today. He seems to be a remarkable persom with a remarkable story yet the holes need to be filled in.

Posted by: david | October 9, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Again, Obama is lying through his teeth about his much deeper relationship with Ayers. The New York Times did an indepth piece on his association with Ayers and concluded that Obama is playing down the extent of this relationship.
Again, it’s about his poor judgement. Our relationships, associations and fellowship with each other is what makes us the person we are and whether we could be trusted to make the right decisions, especially leading the greatest nation on earth.
And for Obama to say that McCain wants “to go after me personally, in some pretty aggressive ways…” is unfair because McCain has steered far away from Jeremiah Wright, another association that Obama should be ashamed of. Remember he was the one who had to make a speech to the American public to distance himself from Jeremiah Wright.

Posted by: Jane | October 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

david,
Obama went to these “privelege” schools through schlorship. He’s a smart man. Took loans for Columbia and Harvard. He took a trip to Pakistan during his college years w/ a friend.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 9, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

DAVID,
the answer is Obama’s grandfather was friends with a exiled black communist from Chicago named Frank Marshall Davis. This guy mentored Obama into adulthood.

Posted by: geevill | October 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

We’re talking about Ayers, and not the stock market, because NEITHER candidate has offered one word about what to do about. Probably because there ISN’T anything that can be done.

Posted by: xaix | October 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

good grief, where do you guys come from, do you have alot of money like Mccain, don’t care about the dow today. Get a grip, talk about something that matter’s.

Posted by: Paul | October 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

You know, EVERY time something like this, Ayers, or Rezko, or some other creepy aspect of Obama’s past that he doesn’t want to talk about, he ALWAYS says “oh, they are just trying to distract from the economy”. The truth is, Mr. obama, that your corruption, dangerous history, and pathological LYING is distracting from the economy.
So, stop lying! First he said Ayers was just a guy who lived in his neighborhood, and now, when pushed, finally admits to having an association with him. “served on a board together” is minimizing this to the ultimate extent…..Obama was hand picked to CHAIR this challenge by Ayers, who had a long relationship with bbefore.
And then, first his campaign says that Obama did not know about Ayers, AND NOW, Obama is saying he thought he was rehabilitated, what a bunch of crock! this is a harvard grad, and Obama did not know about Ayers? And yet, he still was in contact with him until 2005, long after Ayers was well known in the news?
What happenned in 2005, to make Obama stop making contact? Why, he started running for President. So he stops with the guilty assocations. Just like he stopped associating with Wright , sayinhg that he condemned him, TWENTY YEARS after the started the association!
Anything, anyone, will be sacrificed for this selfish, opportunistic, lying Obama.
When will ABC news investigate this, instead of listening and fawning over Obama’s lies?

Posted by: liberati | October 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

here we go again, the republicans along with drudge trying to re-open the already debunked troop story. Heard Todd palin will be implicated in tomorrows report so any diversionary tactic will be highly welcomed by the Rethuglicans

Posted by: vuzous | October 9, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Jane – The NYT pieces also concluded that the two men “do not appear to be close.” So McCain needs to quit grasping at straws. Move on. There’s nothing there.
Besides, you want to get into questionable relationships, how about Todd Palin and the Alaskan Independence Party? They hate America so much they want to leave it…and Governor Palin sent an address to their conference. She also DID NOT leave when a preacher gave an anti-semitic speech in her church.
And how dare Palin imply that “we don’t know the real Barack Obama” when she was an unknown only a couple of months ago? We don’t know the real Sarah Palin, either.
How about McCain and Charles Keating? McCain and Hagee? McCain and Parsley? McCain being on the advisory board of U.S. Council for World Freedom, which was linked with ultra right wing death squads in Latin America?
The McCain campaign can sling all the mud they want, but they’d better be careful because there’s plenty of mud to be slung right back at them.

Posted by: Sharon | October 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

So Obama thinks Ayers is a gentleman?
A domestic terrorist who is unrepentant is a gentleman according to Obama.

Posted by: Greg h | October 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Understanding the McCain/Palin thinking then everyone on that board with Ayres is a terrorist. Any student who was in Ayre’s classes are terrorists. This is ludicrist. Their are enough shady characters in McCains past. Keating for one. Anyone who lost their savings with the Keating scandel would say McCain has no room to talk. This is a man McCain tried to protect when he knew Keating was slime.

Posted by: sassy6712 | October 9, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Please. First story was Obama didn’t know him except as someone in the neighborhood, then he didn’t know at the time of his fundraiser that Ayers was a domestic terrorist now he thought he was rehabilitated! Rehabiliatated from what if he didn’t know Ayers was a terrorists.
Liberal apologists for Obama will accept any lie to make it ok to vote for a man with the most dangerous judgment to ever run for President. The communists called people like that “useful idiots” as long as they served their purpose.
A man who said “Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents.” and said America made him want to puke and it is ok with you that he and Obama co-chaired on 2 separate boards and did fund raisers. How would you feel about McVeigh as a friend? He was no worse than Ayers!

Posted by: Bill | October 9, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

The media (CNN, NY times and so on) did some digging and found nothing. Do some googling on CNN and Ayers .
However McCain is running this sleazy, sinister campaign and keep insisting that media is biased and has not been reporting on this issue.
So this is fight the media can’t win because this is the base of the desperate strategy of McCain. It’s the typical strategy of dumb six pack populism direction he had chosen, creating this “US against evil THEM”.
Leadership starts with having vision and doing it with style… McCain has no vision and his style… well, you be the judge about it.

Posted by: CLabs | October 9, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

“I assumed that he had been rehabilitated”, Bad judgement Obama.
Beside, you lied to us that you didn’t know him. If you didn’t know him, why you have to assume that he had been rehabilitated.

Posted by: Nzone71 | October 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

McCain/Palin are endorsing HATE to their Republican supporters at these rallies!!!
The Republican Party have shown America that they are the KKK with their lies, smears, and RACIAL ATTACKS!!!!
OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 9, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Republicans are trying to blame both parties for the economic failures.
It is at least the hold accountable themselves,
I have question though. How does a government function after winning election is not that true winning is to take responsibility and lead to the right direction.
So as to me it is search for an execuse. Fonally lets agree that Bush in capability screed every thing. Plus the un planned war costs billions.

Posted by: sami | October 9, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Mccain is friends with the sitting president of this education board Obama and Ayers were on. She’s got ties to Ayers, what does that say about Mccain?
What about Gordon Liddy and Charles Keating? What about Palin’s ties to witch doctors and secessionists (Hi Todd!)?
I got news for all the idiots trying to push this NON story: Japan’s stock markets are crashing as we speak (10:10pm EST). Their stocks have plunged 11%. Ours just tanked 7%. Why is all this relevant? Look for more damage tomorrow morning. Mccain needs to start talking about the economy asap.
IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID!

Posted by: EDDIT | October 9, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Kansas-sounding accent? Bwahahahahaha.
Hey, Obama, your grandparents raised you in Hawaii.

Posted by: jackthefact | October 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Here’s some names to throw in the wind that are related to both McCain and Palin: Charles Keating (Savings and Loan Scandal; cost taxpayers $2 billion), Gordon Liddy (Watergate), Joe Vogler (AIP Founder and quoted as saying “The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government”), Eduardo Arocena (32 bombs and 2 deaths; still in jail), Annenberg (who support McCain, and if you want to go the whole “Guilt by Association” route, support Ayers).
Most of all, let’s not forget Mrs. Palin. Good luck on the investigation findings tomorrow.

Posted by: Rhea | October 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Arnold R. Weber was on the board with Obama as part of the Annenberg challenge, he was a friend of Reagan and a former President of Northwestern University…I consider myself a moderate and an independent, I vote primarily along the lines of Republican, I have always had a deep respect for Mccain. When he was nominated I truly felt at ease, I know that despite the rhetoric, McCain is a moderate and his record proves this. I also feel comfortable with Obama, he has shown a great command of the issues and has demonstrated a cool, thoughtful demeanor throughout his campaign. These recent developments with McCain and his negative tactics have really left me feeling empty. More sad than anything. I really wish McCain would work to regain his dignity, his legacy is on the line.

Posted by: Matt | October 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Obama is either a pathological liar or, he is gullible as all get out. Either way, he is unfit to be POTUS. This would be comical if the race wasn’t so close. And, the race wouldn’t be close if the media wasn’t in the tank for him. Oops, am I allowed to say “race”?

Posted by: jackthefact | October 9, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

How many explanations does Obama get on Ayers? The guy will throw any explanation on the wall to see if it will stick.
Each time the explanation is found vacuous and wanting.
1. he’s in the neighborhood
2. I was 8 years old
3. assumed he was rehabbed
Did I miss anything?
——————
And notice how these explanations match his explanations on Rev. JeWright.
1. he is part of the family
2. I never heard him say those things
3. I have disassociated myself from the Rev. of hate
Obama, this guy is not a leader. He is not trustworthy.

Posted by: Captain America | October 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Oh For God’s sake people! Stop the nonsens. Obama is lying. OK! To see it any other way is just plain stupid. Have your gripes about McCain and his past too but at least see this for what it is. He is much like Clinton was in the 90′s. A pathological liar who is digging himself deeper and deeper as he goes and is running out the clock in the next 3 weeks. Sheesh.

Posted by: Katy | October 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

In regards to the Obama-Ayers connection, hundreds of educators who know Ayers personally are speaking out in his defense and in response to the media’s use of this “terrorist connection”.
supportbillayers org

Posted by: Chris R | October 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Every time McCain complains about the media, the media stop questioning the truth of his statements.
But, Sen Obama is just sitting there, trying to coast to the finish, letting himself get trashed in the media.
He should be gathering together economists, having press conferences surrounded by economists, housing professionals, anything to advance new ideas.

Posted by: Karl | October 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Carrie,
Didn’t the Stock Market drop nearly 700 points?
Why are we talking about Ayers?
——————-
I know that Obama says he can stop the rising oceans and heal the planet, so how come he can’t heal the stock market?

Posted by: Captain America | October 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

McCain is now officially into desperation mode. Next they will be crying about how Obama fathered two black children. The good news is it’s a sign that he’s losing–the bad news is he’s behaving in a shameful way after a mostly honorable career in the Senate. It’s always a shame to see someone I’ve otherwise respected sink to such lows.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

So, Obama was a sub-chair on a board with Reaganites and Ayers, for a Republican charity. Neat.
If Ayers was a terrorist, what the hell was Nancy Reagan thinking, pallin’ around with terrorist financiers?
She didn’t seem to have any problem with her good friend Walter Annenberg, giving Ayers FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS.

Posted by: James McGill | October 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

It’s hard getting caught in a lie when America really needs a leader right now. We don’t need hope or change. We need a leader. Status quo is that you can just levarge off others while every body else deos theirs to keep the moving forward. We’ve all done it. But, right now for the first time in a long time we need a leader. Go McCain! You are the real leader. God bless America!

Posted by: SRC | October 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Katy wrote:”Oh For God’s sake people! Stop the nonsens. Obama is lying. OK! To see it any other way is just plain stupid.”
Yes. That’s rational. Everyone who knows either of them say they are not close, and the evidence shows their connection is tenuous at best, but you know he’s lying because…
For Gods sake, stop trying to make mountains out of molehills. It makes McCain look bad and it makes YOU look stupid.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Keating took the McCain family on vacations with them during the time Keating was committing fraud on Lincoln customers. Keating went to prison for what he was doing while John McCain was “pallin’ around” with him.
Poor Cindy couldn’t find the receipts to show they had paid for the trips themselves, became so distraught that she “had” to start on pills.

Posted by: Smears are silly | October 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

McCain supporters will look for any excuse to condemn Obama. His relationship with Ayers has bene thorougly vetted and he was found guilty of no wrong doing.Same with Rezko etc. If that’s all you lot can say on Obama, I must say he is a very clean candidate in comparison to many of our past presidents and McCain himself. Get OVER IT!!!!! Obama WILL make it to the white house and there is nohting you can do about it. YES!! And yes he is black and bears the name BARACK HUSSEIN!! Get over it and stop this form of veiled racism!! Many of you on this board will NEVER achieve what he has achieved!!!

Posted by: Olivia | October 9, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

SRC, McCain is no leader–he’s a maverick, which by definition is not a leader. That’s why he keeps copying Obama. He copies Obama on the “change” and “judgement” themes. He follows along behind Obama on the bailout package. He’s copied Obama on his energy plan, and even on foreign policy. We do need a leader. We need the leader that McCain keeps following behind. We need Barack Obama.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

John McCain used to be a man of moral fabric, a true political maverick. Now, he is desperate and has sold his political soul for mere votes. The more negative he goes at Obama, the more damage he is doing to his own reputation and legacy. Also, he is wedging a stake in his relationship with more than half the country, why want such tainted win? I used to like him, now will vote for Obama for sure.

Posted by: Truth-i-ness | October 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

forgive them father, for they know not what they say.

Posted by: american guesser | October 9, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I always thought Democrats used to be a commonsense, moderate party for the American worker. Now under Obama, they have been hijacked to the far left.
Obama is so radical that he makes even Pelosi look conservative.
Is this party of Clinton or JFK. The direction of Democrat party under Obama is ugly to watch, many lifelong Democrats will be uneasy at their party.

Posted by: Greg h | October 9, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

“..I assumed….”
Gee, Obama, didn’t anyone ever tell you in all of your years of Ivy League education what “assume” means?

Posted by: Lee | October 9, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Enough okay? Obama answered the question.
*The mainstream media said they aren’t writing about the Ayers Obama relationship because because there isn’t anything to write about.We all know they would be all over it if there was.
*FactCheck has said McCain’s accusation is a false accusation. They said there is no relationship between Ayers and Obama. The project they were working on was supported by a grant from a Republican that has supported McCain and other major Republicans.
*The year he had the the event at his house Ayers was given the ‘Citizen of the Year Award” in Chicago for the community projects he was running.
People do change, are you the same as you were 20 or 30 years ago? I hope not. Ayers diverted his energy went to school and got a PhD. I teaches at a respected school. What have you done?

Posted by: vonn | October 9, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

I wanted to follow up my position on the economy and why everyone (Republicans too) needs to refocus on the economy.
Morgan Stanley could be the next big collapse. We all recognize the name, it’s a finance giant in NY. They had investments in Lehman and now they need an $9 billion investment from Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.
Japan is having worse day on the markets than we just did (down 11%). Expect more bad news tomorrow. We have to focus on the economy.

Posted by: EDDIT | October 9, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Obama: “I thought he had be rehabilitated” Bwahhhahhhhahhh
I guess he wasn’t the Bill Ayers he thought he knew. Is Obama the most clueless person in America? He seems totally in the dark about all of his radical friends, jobs with Acorn etc. He just lies alot.

Posted by: robtr | October 9, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

John McCain is just desperate. If he really cared about his “friends”, he would forget about “that one” and talk about what really matters. Economy and Jobs. Its pathetic to see and old man stoop so low… and show himself to be a liar and a deceiver in his final years. I have no respect for the man. And to see Cindy McCain attack Obama and ignore the fact that her own Maverick voted against troop funding is disgusting.

Posted by: Victor | October 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

I’m wondering why McCain has not pointed the finger at every other person who sat on the same Chicago board as Sen. Obama and Ayers. Surely, by McCain’s reasoning, they are all “suspect” and “dishonest” as well. Who are these people who also served on this non-profit and why haven’t they stepped up to Obama’s defense? Why hasn’t the press vigorously persued these other board members who are, apparently, as guilty of associating with “terrorists” as Obama. I have a strong feeling that all of them are amazed that their community service has suddenly become “the issue” in this campaign.

Posted by: Donna | October 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

And why couldn’t Senator Obama assume that Ayers had been rehabilitated, or repentant, or whatever? Ayers is a PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, for Heaven’s sake! The last I heard is that the U of Chicago doesn’t hire terrorists, warmongers, or other sordid characters to teach!

Posted by: chuck | October 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

“McCain is a war hero, and a man of moral fabric”
I’ve tried to find out exactly why he is/was considered the above. I can’t find the answer. Could someone enlighten me?

Posted by: Sandy | October 9, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

John McCain is just desperate. If he really cared about his “friends”, he would forget about “that one” and talk about what really matters. Economy and Jobs. Its pathetic to see and old man stoop so low… and show himself to be a liar and a deceiver in his final years. I have no respect for the man. And to see Cindy McCain attack Obama and ignore the fact that her own Maverick voted against troop funding is disgusting.

Posted by: Victor | October 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Very nice. Barack has explained himself. Now hopefully the candidates will get back to the issues that Americans care about.
The McCain rallies are absolutely terrifying to me. I feel like I’m watching scenes out of 1930s Germany.
I had a lot of respect for McCain until these last few months. The fact that he isn’t condemning the racism, hatred, and calls for violence that are appearing over and over again at his rallies is appalling. If he really wanted to put “country first” he would condemn those people who are tearing it apart.

Posted by: Derick | October 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

How can Obama hear the remarks that Ayers made on 9/11, know that Ayers is unrepentant, and STILL say he assumes Ayers is rehabilitated?
This is simply not logical, and again goes to the judgment question.

Posted by: Lee | October 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

You really have to give it to the McCain/Palin campaign. What a better way to divert everyone’s attention away from Palin’s investigation. Just pull something out from their…

Posted by: Ray | October 9, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

After all the other lies he has told about his friends and mentors, why should we believe what The Tainted One says now????
PUMA! McCain/Palin 2008 – In lieu of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
“No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party which ignores her sex.” – Susan B. Anthony

Posted by: LeeLee07 | October 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Sarah Palin was known to pal around with members of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that has advocated Alaskan secession in violation of the territorial integrity of the United States of America. She has associated with unpatriotic,anti-American activists,and now she condemns Obama for having allegedly done the same. What a hypocrite.

Posted by: Ravi Singh | October 9, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The times are too serious to be pulling cheap dirty tricks like this. At home, we’ve got a heightening economic crisis, increasing joblessness threatening to undermine the livelihoods of entire towns, people’s retirement savings decimated, folks getting thrown out of their homes, and a regulatory framework guided by ideology rather than pragmatism. Overseas, we’re fighting two wars, an increasingly belligerent Iran, a resurgent Russia eager to reassert it’s influence on the former soviet bloc, ukraine destabilized, China rising, and North Korea unresolved, our alliances threatened due to our unilateral…and here we have John McCain playing these dirty totally irrelevant political games, inciting hate, destabilizing the markets with his political maneuvers, appointing an extremist running mate who knows NOTHING about the economy and the world a 72-year old heartbeat away from presidency, and dividing the country along choices (guns, race, abortion, religion, left-right) that are totally irrelevant to this new and very threatening environment, and having absolutely no solid plans to get us out of it. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! I cannot believe that John McCain is STILL not interested in challenging Obama’s plans, and presenting to the American public why his plans are PRACTICALLY superior or relevant to the current environment, or plans that details a significantly different approach to the failures of the last 8 years. His healthcare plan is a farce, his tax plan is unsustainable, he has absolutely no solid ideas for our recovery plans, and absolutely no transition plan for when he assumes power, and shows the underlying influence of special interests in his policy making and his past judgement, and his foreign policy positions have been PROVEN wrong consistently, with his war mongering rhetoric getting increasingly aggressive…and NOW THIS???!!! It infuriates me the absurdity that this once great man has stooped to. We need a serious president, with a steady and even temperament, who is willing to listen to EVERYONE and come up with solutions that work for ALL OF US. We need a president who has the intellect, and the moral compass pointing true north to our interests, who helps the nation focus on what we have in common, not why we are different…we need a president who understands that issues should lie at the foundation of political attacks, not baseless associations focused on dominating the next news cycle. We need someone whose inner circle of influence is not tainted by special interests and lobbists, who has the highest probability of reforming Washington. We need someone who understands the new world order, and who understands that war is but ONE tactic, along with intelligence, diplomatic and economic leverage in our overall strategy to counter our foreign policy challenges today. We need a president who is a calming voice in this cacophony of chaos, who calls out to the best within all of us to lead us out of this hole we’ve dug ourselves into. We need a President who is a pragmatist, who has been consistent, with judgment that is guided by good nature rather than a thirst for power. We need someone with new ideas, and a new approach to change our course in history. ENOUGH WITH THIS PETTY HATE MONGERING, THE TIMES ARE TOO SERIOUS FOR THIS KIND OF NONSENSE. I DON’T CARE IF HE IS BLACK BLUE OR PURPLE, AND I DONT CARE IF HE IS PRO OR ANTI ABORTION, OR LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE…I JUST CARE THAT HE IS RIGHT FOR THE CHALLENGES WE NOW FACE. The republican voter suppression and caging efforts of 2004 and 2000 are very much underway and already making huge impacts across all the swing states, and the campaigning is only going to get more hateful. BARACK OBAMA IS OUR ONLY HOPE AMERICA, AND WE NEED TO DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO ENSURE THAT HE WINS IN NOVEMBER.

Posted by: roarks | October 9, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Lee wrote: “How can Obama hear the remarks that Ayers made on 9/11, know that Ayers is unrepentant, and STILL say he assumes Ayers is rehabilitated?”
See, your problem is not understanding tenses in grammar. Obama said “assumed” which is past tense. You said “assumes” which is present tense. Look it up or something and try to understand that none of this happened last week, it happened many years ago.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

And to think that I once considered voting McCain who is now just another fascist surrounded with secessionists… The Double Talk Express is surely on the bridge to no where!

Posted by: Palinfatigue | October 9, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

From slate.com:
‘“My government is my worst enemy. I’m going to fight them with any means at hand.”
…The quote is from Joe Vogler, the raging anti-American who founded the Alaska Independence Party. Inconveniently for Palin, that’s the very same secessionist party that her husband, Todd, belonged to for seven years and that she sent a shout-out to as Alaska governor earlier this year. (“Keep up the good work,” Palin told AIP members. “And God bless you.”)’

Posted by: Derick | October 9, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Obama has known and worked with hundreds, if not thousands of people in his political life. Ayers is only one of them. McCain knows a few bad apples too. It isn’t that big a deal. Politicians work with all kinds of people. I’m bored with these stories.
Perhaps it’s time to talk about the economy now? Can we, please?

Posted by: mike | October 9, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

What is worse: associating with a former member of a defunct anti-American group, or with current members of an active anti-American group? The Alaskan Independence Party may be a bunch of right-wing anti-Americans, but no less anti-American for that.

Posted by: Ravi Singh | October 9, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

CONSERVATIVE radio host? Are you joking?

Posted by: Paula | October 9, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

robtr writes “Uhmmm chuck, I guess you heard wrong. The University of Chicago hired Bill Ayers.”
I presume, then, that you believe the U of Chicago is a hotbed of radicalism and terrorism, or do you just have an irrational mistrust of any respected institution of higher education?

Posted by: chuck | October 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Very well said, he couldn’t have put it any better than that. I’m so glad he is the democratic candidate, I couldn’t be any more proud.

Posted by: Kathy | October 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

The McCain/Palin campaign has become pathetic, absolutely pathetic! According to a Republican source the ‘on the air’ ads for McCain/Palin have become almost 100% negative. Smears, mudslinging and hateful divisive talk are the last resort of this desperate out-of-ideas campaign. We have a world financial crisis of epic proportions on our hands and their approach is to try and smear Obama with a sixties radical! How ridiculous! McCain/Palin is a horrid, bottom-of-the-barrel ticket which should be soundly and roundly defeated on November 4th 2008!

Posted by: Dalton | October 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

To be honest, I am much more concerned about Obama’s long-standing ties to ACORN, as well as the $800,000 of campaign money that Obama gave to them and then misrepresented it to the FEC, especially in light of all of the voter registration fraud that they have perpetrated during the election.
This is much more of a problem for me than Bill Ayers, and I have a feeling it is about to become a HUGE problem for Obama.

Posted by: Lee | October 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

For those of you who want to talk about bad judgement regarding Barack Obama, what about McCain who helped the criminal Charles Keating WHEN he was committing illegal actions??
Republicans are HYPOCRITES

Posted by: Kathy | October 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Why is he a member of the Democratic Socialist Party?

Posted by: Bishop | October 9, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

What a bunch of tripe!
Obama, didn’t Michelle work with Bernadine Dohrn, Ayers’ wife, in a law firm in 1987? Didn’t you give a ‘rave reveiw’ of Ayers’ Juvinal Justice book in 1997 and sit on a panel with him that was organized by Michelle?
While you’re at it tell us about your Mentor Frank “the communist” back in Hawaii, and Kallidi (spelling) who had many diners with you who advocates terrorist attacks of Isreal, and why you didn’t know who Rev. Wright and Father Pflager where and how you were a member of the radical New Party in the 1990′s as is stated in their newsletter, and how you channeled tax dollars to Rezko, and about your active support of Raila Amolo Odinga and his radical muslim party in Kenya who is now calling for riots and murder.
There are dozens more but not enough room here to go into it.
Please, Barack, tell us about these “friends” of yours.

Posted by: Wally Wagner | October 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

joe sixpack sez: “He helped us win the vietnam war and will help us win the war with pakistan.” HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. In case you haven’t heard, John McCain and Richard Nixon LOST the war in Vietnam. Vietnam was another war we should never have foughte, like Iraq. Also, last time I heard we’re not at war with Pakistan, or has Bush bombed them too while I wasn’t looking.

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

This Oct suprise is way overboard crashing the stock market taking a page from the 1929 election history repeating itself hope the socialist lose this time

Posted by: Bishop | October 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Two WHOPPER lies Barack Obama has told the American people: 1. William Ayers was just “a guy in my neighborhood.” 2. And he (Obama) was never in church when the Rev. Jeremiah Wright was speaking racist or anti-American language. LIES! UNBELIEVABLE, ATROCIOUS LIES to hide from his now suddenly regrettable past mentors. I do not expect the Associated Press to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into these matters. That organization has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is protecting Barack Obama at every opportunity. However I know there must be a journalist in America who is still willing to go where the facts and truth leads. And I invite them to consider some of these questions: 1. Barack Obama keeps saying the same things about Bill Ayers. Can anyone find Ayers and ask him to comment? 2. Barack Obama was a member of the Rev. Wright’s church for decades and his close personal friend (actually closer to family) until it became politically inconvenient. Is anyone trying to interview Rev. Wright about Sen. Obama? 3. Is anyone asking Sen. Obama to comment at length about his activities during his virtually unknown college years at Occidental and Columbia? Is anyone finding any of Obama’s fellow students at these institutions that remember him? Has anyone asked Obama why he won’t release his senior thesis or his transcripts? Too many unanswered questions and too much untruthfulness from someone who wants us to entrust him with the country.

Posted by: Alarmed Citizen | October 9, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Rex, you’re talking about the ANNENBERG FOUNDATION for God’s sake. ANNENBERG is a Republican’s republican, and conservative among conservatives, and a close confidant of your god Ronald Reagan. So does that make RR a posthumous “friend of terrorists”

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Our country continues to need serious introspection about our foreign policies. From the Iran contra affair, the Jesuit Priest massacre in El Salvador, the protracted Vietnam war, and now the preemptive strike against Iraq; even the fact that WE were the ones who introduced nuclear technology to the world — we’re just so afraid to hold up a mirror to see who we really are.
William Ayers wants us to hold up a mirror. He causes people to think, to be pensively introspective. Just because Barack Obama served on a board with a distinquished Professor who happened to be well-connected in the education profession in Chicago, does not make Barack a terrorist. My word, that was 40-years ago!
George Bush hangs out with the bin Laden family, and the Bush family has been good friends with the Saudi’s for decades. Does that make them terrorists? I hardly think so. They are oil men and Ayers and Obama are educators. Get over it.
Will we allow the radicals on the right or the left to distract us from the real prize? – that of supporting the one candidate who has the commitment to implement a national health care plan in his first four years in office; the one candidate who has the most ambitious alternative energy program we’ve ever seen which will enhance our national security while reducing our dependence on foreign oil; the one candidate who offers a fresh new approach to foreign policy which will help re-establish friendly relationships with our traditional allies while we resurrect our position of leadership and respect in the world through our economic strength, not our military? Or, will we be duped by the fear-mongers, the nay-sayers, the Matt Drudge, Limbaugh, and Hannity shock jock crowd; who make a living speaking spewing hatred.
Nubtail — You can do better. And, we can do better than McCain for a President. Obama is not perfect but at least he’s brilliant. He’s going to make a fine President, you watch.

Posted by: Andrew L | October 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Seriously, who would want to be president now? Pretty bad job if you ask me. The economy is going to be a huge headache.

Posted by: Mike | October 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Hey Bishop, the 1929 stock market crash happened while Republican president Hoover was in office. It took a democrat “socialist” like FDR to pull America out of the Republican tank back then too.

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Obama is no FDR.

Posted by: Lee | October 9, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

The deal with Ayers and Obama is true. Obama flaked out on the truth. He spent six years working with Ayers. Oh, and what about that birth certificate Obama? You would think that something as simple as a birth certificate is becoming extremely difficult to produce. Now there is a federal lawsuit against Obama and the DNC. Where is your birth certificate, your school records and your medical records? Why
have you refused to release these records? Obama is always hiding his
truth. The American people deserve better and they surely don’t need
four years of socialism. Oh who’s got that short list of sellers Chris Cox?

Posted by: Campbell | October 9, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I just wanted to tell everyone about the keating 5 scandal, which we know alot about due to the fact that we were from AZ. The democrat leading the charge on this completely exonerated mccain, and said that there was no reason for mccain to be involved in the case. after this case was over, McCain came out and said to the press “i am here for the rest of the day and will stay here and answer all of your questions.” He stayed there and answered every question the press asked, HE DID THIS FOR 2 HOURS. When has obama ever stood there for 2 hours and answered every question from the press on his associations? People…come on! obama is lying to us!!! cant you see this?!?! Obama started the mud slinging, McCain has no choice but to fight dirty now. No one has confronted obama on anything, accept O’Riely. Hannity has been going strong since the primary, but obama’s too much of a chicken to go toe to toe with him. People please, use your computer and investigate what these guys records are, look on there web sites and compare the agenda’s, I beg you!!!!!

Posted by: crystal | October 9, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Lee, no, Obama is no FDR. I don’t think America can produce leaders like FDR anymore. We’ve become a personality cult where substance is of no consequence. Remember when political parties had platforms that candidates ran on? Those platforms were made of policy “planks”. We all voted for the party whose “platform” best represented our views. Today we vote for the candidate that will promise us the most stuff they have no intention of delivering or who is a “real American”.

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Alarmed citizen writes “And I invite them to consider some of these questions:1. Barack Obama keeps saying the same things about Bill Ayers. Can anyone find Ayers and ask him to comment? 2. Barack Obama was a member of the Rev. Wright’s church for decades and his close personal friend (actually closer to family) until it became politically inconvenient. Is anyone trying to interview Rev. Wright about Sen. Obama? 3. Is anyone asking Sen. Obama to comment at length about his activities during his virtually unknown college years at Occidental and Columbia? Is anyone finding any of Obama’s fellow students at these institutions that remember him? Has anyone asked Obama why he won’t release his senior thesis or his transcripts?”
All of the above has been done and then done some more except his senior thesis. No one can find a copy including the University. It was 25 years ago fer God’s sake.
Your petty desperation is showing. I assume you’ll read all sorts of nefarious intent into his missing thesis. Of course it must have been a Muslim rant expressing hatred of all Americans and vowing undieing allegience to his terrorist masters…
You people are so transparent.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Can somebody please tell me how a Terrorist can be rehabilitated?
How many of you want us to try to rehabilitate Osama Bin Laden?
Is Obama saying that he thinks that Terrorists, those who struck us in 9-11 can be rehabilitated?
There Republicans thats your new attack ad. Use it!!!!!

Posted by: Charles | October 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Chris try collidge 1923-1929 Hoover got it just as it was happening.

Posted by: Bishop | October 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Ogivemeabreak, Obama! In 2001, post 9-11, Bill Ayers said he wished he’d done more when planning and attempting to blow up US Govt. facilities. Obama didn’t hear it?
Lies, lies, lies. And who is David Axlerod?
I know. I live in Chicago. I have lived in Cook county for longer than Obama. Axlerod has been the mouthpiece of and denier for the Chicago Democratic machine through more investigations, indictments and convictions than the entire so-called congress of the Bush era during the entire Obama presidential campaign.
Barack is an unrepentant and unabashed supporter a litany of lower approval rating Chicago Democrats than the entire Bush administration.
The only people Obama and his campaign don’t seem to vet or know about, are the people supporting Obama and helping Obama. Obama has supported verbally, in the face of much negative news about, at least until it became politically inexpedient, if not still, a litany of unsavory characters. If Obama wins this election, he will win another race, that of the most supportive of and most supported by those investigated, indicted and eventually imprisoned. Reform, change? Yeah, if changing deodorant and toilet paper are counted.
Obama and his campaign claim to know so much about McCain, Palin, Bush, Cheney, etc., who they have likely never spent 1/100 the time with as they have spent with Ayers, Rezko, Wright, Stroger, Daley, etc.
And yet at every opportunity, Obama claims to not have known about any of the unsavory or illegal activities of his own supporters and mentors. And his mouthpiece, David Axelrod, has repeatedly, sadly successfully so far, protected every Democrat he’s campaigned for, from fallout from knowing these well known Chicago Democratic machine unsavory characters.
Given the Obama campaign’s denials of any longstanding knowledge Bill Ayers, how, with a straight or Chicago machine politics crooked face, can Obama or David Axelrod even say anything negative about Sarah Palin, who, likely, neither had ever even met more than two months ago, or has know of, or even followed, before Obama declared his presidential candidacy?
On the subject of Jeremiah Wright, Dennis Miller summed it up best. According to Obama’s own statements during the O’Reilly Factor interviews, Obama, through almost 500 sermons, never realized any of the anti-American inflammatory sentiments of his spiritual leader. [20 years, 2x a month=24x a year]. Ogivemeabreak, Obama!

Posted by: John Elert | October 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Campbell wrote: “The deal with Ayers and Obama is true. Obama flaked out on the truth. He spent six years working with Ayers. Oh, and what about that birth certificate Obama? You would think that something as simple as a birth certificate is becoming extremely difficult to produce. Now there is a federal lawsuit against Obama and the DNC. Where is your birth certificate, your school records and your medical records? Why?”
Gosh you desperate idiots are funny. Obama didn’t spend “six years working with Ayers” unless you consider sitting on a couple boards together a few times a year to fit that definition. And he has (of course) long since produced his birth certificate.
I urge you to use that website, though I’m sure you won’t–yould rather cling to lies than learn the truth.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Bishop, what’s the difference. Coolidge is just another Repbublican. So Collidge got us into the depression and Hoover couldn’t get us out? Simplistic I know but the great depression did happen on a Republican watch, and the policies crafted by FDR are, in large measure, responsible for ending it and setting up a regulatory infrastructure that kept it from happening again until this year.

Posted by: Chris Ebling | October 9, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

John Elert wrote: “Ogivemeabreak, Obama! In 2001, post 9-11, Bill Ayers said he wished he’d done more when planning and attempting to blow up US Govt. facilities. Obama didn’t hear it?”
He heard it. That’s why he used the past tense “assumed” rather than the present tense “assume.” The question was about why he went to Ayers house one time in 1995. You Obama haters seriously need to get your time lines straight.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I believe just like now it took them all and It did take 24 years to gain back what we lost I am now an Independent but until June I was a center of the road democrat.

Posted by: Bishop | October 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

It’s clear that there are still many people who are very afraid of having a black man elected to the presidency, and who are clutching at straws to try to find a plausible reason to hate & fear him without seeming racist. McCain knows this and is shamelessly using it. Thankfully, it is such an obvious ploy and such a weak and lame attempt at guilt by association (it was weak & lame even before the media debunked it months ago) that thinking people who aren’t racist and who do put “country first” will never fall for it. There are more people sickened by the hatefulness and underhandedness than can ever be drawn in by the smears. Most who are at these rallies wouldn’t dream of ever voting for a democrat, let alone a black man, in any case. Let’s move on to the real issues that face this country, please.

Posted by: Grownup | October 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“My father was from Kenya so I’ve got an Arab-sounding name.”
Uh huh. It was Barry up until what year? Only after his full indoctrination into his life of shady deals, associations, and cover stories did he change it to Barrack Hussein Obama. He named himself that, not his Arab father.

Posted by: Emm | October 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Hmmm… someone removed the website factcheck.org from my earlier comment. Funny, it’s a non-commercial non-partisan information site. Try again–

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Obama might not have “worked” for six years with Ayers, but their acquaintance definitely goes back to the late ’80s when Michelle (then Robinson) and Ayers’ wife both worked at Sidley & Austin in Chicago and Obama came to work there on summer break from law school.

Posted by: Lee | October 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Let’s see here:
Obama:
Spent 20 years listening to Anti-American, Anti-White rhetoric from his racist minister and then when he and his wife accidentally make racist, Anti-American remarks like “typical white person” “clinging to bibles..etc” and “Never been proud of my country” they claim that it is not related
Launched his political career from the home of a man who bombed the Pentagon. Check that again…Obama spent time with, respects, and launched his career from the home of a man who bombed the the United States Military Headquarters. Obama is friends with the guy who attacked the United States!
Had his campaign contribute $800,000 to an organization which has been convicted in 12 states for voter fraud. An organization which he worked for 13 years ago. An organization the is left wing radical.
Accepted over $250,000 from Tony Rezco (who is now in jail for fraud). He and Rezco have a long and corrupt relationship that is too long to list here, but you can read about it on Wikipedia (The left wing college idiots keep erasing it but it keeps coming back)
And this is the guy that is leading in the polls???? THis is the guy that the media is in love with? ARE YOU PEOPLE INSANE??????

Posted by: Don | October 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Emmm. “Barry” was his nickname growing up. “Barack Hussien Obama is the name on his birth certificate.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

“It’s clear that there are still many people who are very afraid of having a black man elected to the presidency.”
No, they’re afraid of a lying corrupt crooked politician with no clear history or record of significant achievement who just happens to be black. He could be purple and we still wouldn’t vote for him.

Posted by: Emm | October 9, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Bishop, you’re right. It took both parties’ collective incompetence to cause the great depression, just like the one looming on the horizon now. We’re on the edge of a MAJOR change in lifestyle and no politician can change that now. It just might take us another 24 years to recover from the loss. Unfortuately, I’ll probably be dead by then. That wal-mart greeter job is looking pretty good right now.

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

THE FACT THE MEDIA MISSED: EXPOSING OBAMA’S BLATANT LIE
Michelle Obama, Barack Obama and Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dohrn, the even worse Terrorist Bomber who was on the FBI’s “10 Most Wanted List” worked at the same law firm in 1991. Michelle and Bernadine Dohrn worked at that law firm several years before that as well.

Posted by: Lexi | October 9, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Anna, what birth certificate? The fake one, the one supposedly in the “vault” that no one has seen, or the registry of birth? No one has yet to prove he was even born in Hawaii (two different hospitals in Honolulu?), let alone what his name was.

Posted by: Emm | October 9, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Mccain is not at all presidential. He is acting like a confused mad-man, nowhere to go and nothing to offer to America. His campaign has gone bankrupt!
How sad…
Is this the same guy who once did Americans proud?
Sad, indeed!!! Really sad to see McCain losing it this way!!!

Posted by: cindyasso | October 9, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Emmm, his birth certificate has been seen and verified. I’ve tried to link to the site twice, but apparently it’s against the rules.

Posted by: Anna | October 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Will you people give up on the birth certificate nonsense. Obama, like McCain, was investigated fully by the FBI, NSA, and other 3-letter US intelligence agencies. If they’re satisfied with his birth records so am I. Or are the FBI and NSA part of the “vast liberal conspiracy” too?

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Chris in Texas
this is not about Obamas birth certificate its about his association with AYers who gave money from a grant to him for ACORN and ACORN is now suspected of voter fraud in 7 states if that happned in NC in the primaries and prevented a Hillary Clinton win I will be angry

Posted by: staniam | October 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

John Elert:
Ok, so you live in Chicago– or Cook County (let me guess: not the city, but one of the wealthy burbs?). That makes you one of almost 10 million people, including myself, the vast majority of whom overwhelmingly support Obama. Anyone who can read, especially if they are from Chicago, knows that Obama’s associations and actions have been put under a microscope repeatedly and he has come out clean. And I have to say, I am getting tired of hearing Chicago blasted as if we are in the Al Capone era and it is all gangsters and corruption. Every locale has its political scandals, but I have lived in Chicago most of my life, and have also traveled widely, and this is a beautiful, well-run city that has seen quite solid economic growth & renewal over the past 20 years. I love living here, and everyone I have ever known who has visited has been impressed (sometimes surprised to be impressed, because these old stereotypes die hard). It’s a city Americans have good reason to be proud of, and Obama is a politician Americans also have reason to be proud of (for a change).

Posted by: Grownup | October 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

you obamabots are crowing that is over and that Obama is head in al the states etc but what if those leads… most within the margin of error… are fueled by ACORNs work which is unconstitutional… you igits claimed that it was not unconstitutional for Hillary to be beaten like she was in the primaries but voter fraud like mail fraud is a federal offense … you igits are dumber than dumb!

Posted by: staniam | October 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

I am not as concerned about Obama’s connections to Ayers as I am concerned about Obama’s connections to Rashid Khalidi. Obama gave (Khalidi) $70,000 which immediately went to Khalidi’s organiation that sponsors anti-western terrorism and prays for the mass genocide of the Jewish population.
However, what concerns me most about the Ayers connection is that Obama received money for schools through the endeavors of Ayers. What did Obama do with the money? He gave it to ACORN. Is that how Obama is going to fund education? He wants to give our tax dollars (that should be dedicated to the schools and our children) to radical organizations that are not even fully dedicated to the school system?
I don’t care for either candidate, but Obama is definitely the worst of the two evils.

Posted by: Michelle | October 9, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

staniam – I was responding to the idiots who keep questioning Obama’s citizenship. No one can run for the US presidency without be a VERIFIED natural born citizen. This is VERIFIED by US intelligence and federal police (FBI) agencies. Questions about ACORN are legitimate questions and deserve an answer. Personally I think the ACORN stuff is no more relevant that the ballot stuffing accusations against LBJ in South Texas

Posted by: Chris in Texas | October 9, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I feel sick to my stomach as I read some of the most ignorant and racial comments ever in my life. Obama is well educated and passionated to make America a better place. Yet because of his skin color and Arabic name, he is treated so unfairly…

Posted by: ictoan | October 9, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Grownup its not the city itself its the 50 miilion given to Obama by the anneburg foundation to give to ayers that was to be used for an education grant… but it was used for ACORN which did voter registration…ACORN which consists of many organizations are handling Obama fundraising…this is a travesty and its a good thing that justice caught you before they election its not to late…as bad as the financial crisis is… Obama seized on it as a distraction.. this has to stop we will push back and push you obamabots right over the cliff! you have not won yet!

Posted by: staniam | October 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Ictoan
thats not the subject of this thread… matter ocf fact ACORN is all you are going to hear for the next 26 days because this is illegal and for a man and a campaign to profess to being high minded but its about as gutter politics as you can get never mind al capone style

Posted by: staniam | October 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Chris
absoultely or the mafia registering dead people in in Chicago in 1960…times change but people dont… imagine claiming to be helping poor people while pocketing millions for yourself and using it for a nongermain appropriation… non germain means not realated since Obama hasnt been in the snate long enough to learn the rules!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Michelle
right…. there were questions in the primaries abotu ACORN and the caucueses which gave Obama his lead but was statistically insignificat to the primary votes… and the tx caucus and primary were held on the same day and Hillary won the primary and the caucus mysteriously gave obama the state… the media shrugged this off… and I was on this blog months ago in the NC primary when some schmuck admitted to using church busses to drive homeless black people to the polls.. can you say ACORN… and it doesnt take 50 million to organize an effort like that! by the way all of Obamas fundraising goes through them so you have no idea of the amounts… that are over the $2300 limit the 25 50 and 100 dollar donations that they crow about is a sideshow!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Sorry I fogot to say that my advisor has said that I didn’t know Ayers past when I met him.
He is just just another guy I met on Chicago steet, wrongly ended up in his living room

Posted by: Judy Miles | October 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

“Yet because of his skin color and Arabic name, he is treated so unfairly…”
Awwwwwwwwww, so unfairly. :(
Yeh right. He’s shmoozed his way into every job he ever had and couldn’t stay there long enough to make any difference. His brainwasher, Wright, prepared him for his racist view of American society which he used against the majority and won a free ride from the media. If you don’t agree with him, you’re racist. He’s stuck in the 60′s, still fighting a race war. Think he’ll reach across the aisle? Never has, never will.

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Emm
no democratic candidate has ever won the nomination by losing several key states like Obama did… now we know why, ACORN!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Like I said earlier, it’s the voter registration fraud, and the potential for election fraud that goes hand-in-hand with it that bothers me.
These ACORN activities are illegal, and they strike at the heart of our democracy.
Obama has donated campaign money to this organization, funneled grant money to this organization when he worked with Ayers on the Annenberg Challenge, he has represented them in court, he was Executive Director of their Project Vote subsidiary, and he has trained their workers.
Palling around with Ayers, and sitting in Wright’s church for 20 years are not criminal activities.
The activities presently being perpetrated by this organization that Obama has been so closely intertwined with for nearly two decades are illegal.

Posted by: Lee | October 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

This is what Obama’s friends and supporters are – Ayers, Farakkan, Bernadettle DOhm, Khalid mansoor, Rev Jeremiah wrigh and the list goes on.
And Obama wants to be President?

Posted by: Greg h | October 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Judy
Obama had to be in ayers living to get street cred to even run for state senate

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

gregh
there is a cancer growing on the presidency before he even gets into office…sounds nixonian to me

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

lee
they have to be stopped…..I thought that in past elections the repubs were paranoid about such things but I saw it happen to other candidates in the democratic primaries and this is illegal at best

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

It’s clear that many of the posters are gleeful to have an excuse to hate the black man. It’s actually very scary. Do you people hear yourselves?
If only John McCain got as much news coverage of his ugly dealings and associates, I might be able to stomach this nonsense. The man consistently tries to tie Obama to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, but which candidate employs (lets manage their campaign, in fact) a person who received $15,000 PER MONTH from the two crooked companies, until they were taken over by the government. Yes, he was taking money even when running McCain’s campaign. To quote Bob Dole, “where’s the outrage?”

Posted by: sick | October 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

You said it, Stan. ACORN will be Obama’s undoing. The media will have to give up their messiah and hopefully the trance will wear off so at least some of the rational, though temporarily blinded left, will see him for what he is before election day.

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

“Yes, he was taking money even when running McCain’s campaign.”
And wasn’t he dismissed after this came to light?

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

No. Emphatically no. He wasn’t dismissed. Do some research, for heaven’s sake. The man is still running the campaign.

Posted by: sick racists | October 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Some of you people really need to go out and get a newspaper — stop reading the propaganda on the McCain website.
Some of you people are so desperate to keep a democrat out of the White House that you’ll latch onto anything the republican machine wants you to believe. Don’t you realize that they’re just using you to get richer and gain more power? Keep you scared, keep you riled up, and keep you poor. They let you join their party, but they’re laughing at you all the way to the bank.

Posted by: Bill | October 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Emm
yep you could hear the desolation in the medias voices tonight when talking about it…they have to give it up now.. it really makes me angry that they made me feel guilty for supporting another candidate when she might have won anyway with that ACORN group registering people like daffy duck with false addresses etc

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

I am a teacher and sit on a board with a lot of other people. Some I like, some I definitely do not like, but the nature of a board is to have differing opinions. As a board member, I did not choose these people, nor do I have the right to dismiss anyone. We meet once a month at most, and I have nothing to do with them outside of that contact. To attack Barack Obama over his attendance at board meetings where Ayers was also a member is absurd, dishonest, and with the type of language and hype the Republicans are putting into it, increasingly dangerous. We need to stand up to this party and tell them we will not take their dangerous lies and tactics any more.

Posted by: katharine | October 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Carrie said: “Which brings me to Sarah Palin who has yet to do a press conference let alone sit down for an interview with liberal media.”
Apparently, Carrie hasn’t heard of Katie Couric or Charlie Gibson.

Posted by: Mia | October 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Bill
forget about it… this is a federal offense that the obama campaign committed and it makes sense to everyone now… go away perhaps you wont go to jail!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

So if the accusation was true, why wasn’t he dismissed?

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

That’s pretty much the point I’m trying to make, emm.

Posted by: sick racists | October 10, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

“Which brings me to Sarah Palin who has yet to do a press conference let alone sit down for an interview with liberal media.”
Different strategy, nothing wrong with not giving PC, just ask Biden. With the media slant, I’m surprised she even did Gibson and Couric, but certainly after that, she had a better understanding just how deep in the tank they were with Obama.

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Katherin
you dupe… its not just about sitting on a board… Obama was the poltician that gave the money to Ayers that was granted to him byt he anneburg foundation and they used it for voter registration rather than the schools which it wasan education grant

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Exactly. Apparently, criminality is based on the amount of funds illegally gained, since it seems everyone is in on something. But my point is who’s done it the worst, who’s lied about doing it, and who can the American people in good conscience, tolerate?

Posted by: Emm | October 10, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

That’s pretty funny. It turns out that there is actually someone in John McCain’s campaign who was on that same Annenberg Challenge board with Obama and Ayers. LOL. Of course, since the Annenberg Foundation was founded by Republicans, that’s not so surprising.
Terrorists?!

Posted by: jock59801 | October 10, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

‘Which brings me to Sarah Palin who has yet to do a press conference let alone sit down for an interview with liberal media. ‘
I thought Sarah palin did 2 interviews with the Liberals.
One with Charlie Gibson of ABC, one with Katie Couric of CBS.

Posted by: Greg h | October 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Emm
I hope that people wake up and see what has been going on here…luckily the polls arent out of reach and it would make it even better if Obama got his lead from the “vast new regstration of voters” from ACORN… that would be intstant discrediting… I think they even could delay inauguration day to do a full investigation innauguration day used to be in march back in FDRs time… but ofcourse the airhead obamabots dont know that about history

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

“He should be gathering together economists, having press conferences surrounded by economists, housing professionals, anything to advance new ideas.”
Hey, why didn’t he do this when he was in the Senate for two years?!

Posted by: kelley | October 10, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I really can’t believe what I am reading here. 3 or 4 people chris from texas, Annna etc. Giving us a Sarah Palin by repeating the same line, over and over and over. Completely lame
“We don’t need hope and change we need a leader..” Anna
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,
right! We had a leader the last eight years. It did not work out to well for us.
I think i’ll try hope and change
You guys need to wake up to reality and
stop spreading hate. I don’t care about these acquaintances. I wan’t to here how McCain will fix this economy
with real details not some pathetic cop out like “I will be a Maverick” Just tell me what youa re going to do so I can decide!

Posted by: anthony | October 10, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

jock59801
thats not the issue the issue is the money that was given out and ayers illegally gave it to Obama to distribute and it was an aeducation grant used for voter registration

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

RL in Illinois
you must know about it all then… why did this have to come out this late… the Obama people are either very vbery good, very criminal or both there is no room for extremism in poltics like this

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

anthony
yea fix the ecomony with a bunch of admitted felons and potential voter fraud campaign workers… right…the economy was the smokescreen to give obama the edge… obama must have lobbyists on wall st… wait he does!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Obama’s political coming out party was hosted by Bill Ayers and Bernadin Dohrn in their home.
Money from Acorn was misdirected from housing to Ayer’s educational pursuits:
“Obama-Ayers Channeled Annenberg Money to ACORN to Advance Leftist Agenda is Chicago Schools”
“Terrorist Bill Ayers and Obama did work closely together on the Anneberg project (CAC), sought to circumvent local schools to apply leftist teachings and did funnel CAC money to organizations fronting for ACORN”!
“According to the documents, the CAC granted money to far-leftist causes, such as the radical Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which, WND reported, has done work on behalf of Obama’s presidential campaign” …… LIKE DEFRAUDING ELECTION LISTS!!!!!
And please don’t try the patience of those “non-believers” who find it enormously difficult to call his association with Ayers fleeting and innocuous when it has been proven that Obama was promoting Ayers’ book in 1997, serving on boards with him until 2002, and trading emails and phone calls with him as recently as 2005!
AND IF HE IS SO COMFORTABLE WITH THIS ASSOCIATION, WHY DOES HE HAVE TO LIE??

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Hope Change hate
and dont forget the obama biographer Corsey that was detained in Kenya this week… Im not sure if it was ACORN but some foundation connected with Obama sent money to kenya that the media never covered as well

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

eyes extremely wide open
yep I heard a board of electons worker being interviewed on CNN from Indiana where they had some suspect registrations in the primaries and now they have to deal with suspect registrations for the GE and she said they dont have time to go through them all but about 2000 were fraudulent

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

First, ABC seems to have pulled a story that would have meant John McCain canceling the interview with Gibson. It has no problem parroting a McCain talking point. It has a problem reporting a story detrimental to McCain, obviously. Why is that?
Cindy McCain: The POWs Who ‘Had the Trouble’ Were Young Draftees, Not Trained Officers Like My Husband Think Progress has a story with the Marie Claire magazine link ABC censored to get the McCain interview.
That’s rather reprehensible. Cindy McCain suggests her husband does not suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder because men who enlist don’t get it and men who were drafted do.
So how does that explain our Iraq and Afghanistan vets? The ones John McCain has failed to support? That VoteVets and others have given a ‘D’ grade to? Is it any surprise McCain is involved with suppressing information about Vietnam POWs?
A cover-up of POW information, you ask. It’s true. John McCain helped do it. The question we need to ask him is just why …1973 is when the Hanoi peace treaty was signed in Paris. 1974 is the year where every known POW was turned over to the U.S.
Nixon and Kissinger were surprised by the ‘low’ number of POWs said to be held in Hanoi.
In 1992, there were hearings saying that there were prisoners missing from the list of names reported in 1973. Not quite 600 names were on the ‘treaty’ list.
“In the late 1970s and early 1980s, listening stations picked up messages in which Laotian military personnel spoke about moving American prisoners from one labor camp to another. ” Distress signals were picked up by NSA.
A woman named Dolores Alfond attended a 1992 committee meeting about the listening devices. “McCain attended that committee hearing specifically to confront Alfond because of her criticism of the panel’s work. He bellowed and berated her for quite a while. His face turning anger-pink, he accused her of “denigrating” his “patriotism.” The bullying had its effect—she began to cry.”
Hanoi suggested it was using other POWs as bargaining chips.
In 1991, the Pentagon started actively covering up any suggestion there were POWs left behind in Hanoi, despite the claim of up to over 1,200 soldiers on the list.
“John McCain—now campaigning for the White House as a war hero, maverick and straight shooter—owes the voters some explanations. …I have not found a single mention of his role in burying information about POWs. Television and radio news programs have been similarly silent….The only explanation McCain has ever offered for his leadership on legislation that seals POW files is that he believes the release of such information would only stir up fresh grief for the families of those who were never accounted for in Vietnam.” from a piece by Sydney H. Schanberg, The Nation. Since no broadcast or cable network has checked into all this.

Posted by: kravitz | October 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Hope CHange
yea wasnt that the motto in 1960 and other elections… “vote early and often” this is the October surrose and it gives the people not supporting Obama some relief btu no comfort in the fact that laws in this country continue to be broken… if al gore had aske for a statewide recount of florida rather than broward co he wouldve had a big enough margin to overtake bush… what will the supreme court do this time…I have a feeling I will agree with their ruling this time… this is grounds for automatic contestation of the election

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Kravitz
POW,viet nam, cindy mccain,sarah palin etc are diverstions from ACORN committign federal offenses … youre going down, way down to chinatown like I promised in the primaries!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

RL in Illinois
you must know about it all then… why did this have to come out this late… the Obama people are either very vbery good, very criminal or both there is no room for extremism in poltics like this
Posted by: staniam | Oct 10, 2008 1:02:33 AM
_____________________
all of this stuff WAS brought up before by Hillary Clinton, for one, and on other blogs.
The press was in L O V E with Obama and hid anything that could have besmirched his name…. and that’s pretty much still the case.
However, there are a few NEWSPAPERMEN out there…. like in the WALL STREET JOURNAL….wwho have finally decided that enough damage has be done, and decided to give us facts rather than slanted-one-way only opinion!
Let’s hope it’s not too little to late!!!

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Obama is trying to have it both ways again.
Obama continued his relationship with ayres even after ayres said in 2001 he had no regrets for the bombings.
Obama continued to sit on his board and be friends and have e-mail chats and go to parties.
Obama also wasn’t honest about Rezko.
Obama even after Rezko was under federal investigation for influence peddling by patrick fitzgerald Obama still did a land deal with him.
Obama first told the washington post and GMA he knew nothing about it before later admitting he did know about it.
Obama said there was no inkling rezko was trouble which wasn’t the truth.
Obama also continued to praise Wright even after Wright said America’s chickens came home to roost on 9/11.
In July 2007 6 months after Obama learned about Wright’s 9/11 comments Obama used a speech to praise Wright.
This was terrible judgement on Obama’s behalf.

Posted by: Dan | October 10, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

eyes extremely wide open
it is our constitutional duty to challenge these frauds…do not be afraid of these people… even the press is saying that Obamas plane smells and he doesnt give availability… I know thats not germaine but it goes to the same point

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Ayres in 2001 said he had no regrets for the bombings to the NY Times.
Obama continued an e-mail relationship with him until 2005 and went to parties with him and sat on a board with him.
For four years after Ayres said he had no regrets about the bombings Obama continued the relationship with Ayres.
It wasn’t until Obama was gearing up his presidential run that he cut ties with Ayres.
This is about honesty.

Posted by: Simon | October 10, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

I wonder why Obama would take the stand that he assumed, has he not heard the break down ASSuME (it is rather amussing were talking about a Democrat who’s mascot is a jack ASS.

Posted by: Jackie Allen | October 10, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

simon
why has it taken this long for honesty… they just snickered at those askign questions durign the primaries… why cant people wake up anddo their civic duty to prevent thugs like this from taking… yes obama included if thats racist I dont care!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

I hate to say it but the republicans are right on this… I will now vote for Mccain or a third party… it is clear Obamas activities or those on behalf of him were fraudulent… that cannot stand!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Funny no sense issue at reflect the poor situation of McCain.
There’s certainly one thing Ayers and McCain have in common: who needs them?

Posted by: Krishna Dixit | October 10, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Did you know James B. Fowler, McCain’s friend who was busted for smuggling heroin out of Thailand, is the same guy who shot Jimmie Johnson, an unarmed black man, and set off a movement that led to The Voting Rights Act? Ironic that McCain knows the guy whose killing of an unarmed black man led to the Voting Rights Act. Very Ironic.

Posted by: kravitz | October 10, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Yes, Ohio.
I find it VERY strange that most of this voter registration fraud has been occurring in the states that are the most hotly contested.
I wonder if Florida has started checking their voter registration cards yet?

Posted by: Lee | October 10, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Staniam:
We need a constitutional law lawyer….. in fact, this is a situation which should be visited by the Supreme Court!
AND I HOPE IT IS!
(the only constitutional law lawyer who comes to mind is B O….maybe he can defend himself!)

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

I now do not see this election ending up anywhere other than the Supreme Court, just like 2000.
And we all know how that one turned out.

Posted by: Lee | October 10, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

eyes extremely wide open
yea Im sure axelrod has a sense of humor.. that was brazen attempt to flaunt obama as a constitutional lawyer while breaking federal laws…..Im sure there can be a class action suit filed in federal court but I have to reasearch that…Im not going to go through 4 yrs of what we had to do for the last 8 yrs with bush… I told everyone that Obama was using Bush tactics.. nobody listened!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Lee
exactly… and if Obama and his people pull it off like Bush did in 2000 they will be more asinine than Bush ever was after he won that month long recount battle

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Anna, you are so right! Well said!

Posted by: W.Marks | October 10, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

“I told everyone that Obama was using Bush tactics.. nobody listened.”
SNIPPED FROM STANIAM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I did!
I kept writing that B O was just the other Bozo…. more like Bush than any Republcan candidate!
But, you’re right!
Nobody listened!

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Yes, but what I think Obama and all of his followers are forgetting is that even though the Dems control both houses of Congress, the Supreme Court is even more conservative than it was in 2000.

Posted by: Lee | October 10, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

marc 10
your choice is wrong!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Lee
yep so if there is a challege to the election they cant manipulate that…its jsut mind boggling that we have 26 days and this comes out… these Obamabots are very good but fatally flawed

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Katy
that is irrelevant… google ayers now and you will see your obamaworld is coming apart… innauguration might even be delayed to investigate these thugs… it took 30 days to come to a conclusion in 2000 this will take longer

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

eyes extremely wide open
yea I remember you from the primary days and how these bozos were crying after the Hillary/obama debate in PA saying that we trashed their dreams and all .. what a crock!

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Yes, well, I have ALWAYS been a believer in “what goes around, comes around.”
What Obama, the DNC and the media did to Hillary in the primaries was disgusting. Playing the race card, making her feel like a non-person half the time, and then trying to force her out of the race when she and Obama were practically tied.

Posted by: Lee | October 10, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Lee
absoultely… and Donna Brazille just plops out there daily on CNN being nonapplogetic nothing should be said against sen Kennedy at this time, but Obama was ahead of Hillary by less than what keenedy was behind Carter in 1980… and anyway why didnt Hillary bring the acorn stuff up mor forcefully… was she paid by them too ?

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Staniam:
Please talk with intelligence and facts. If you say that I am wrong please help with sound reasons of why. I gave you and everyone else facts to explore so that you and everyone else can make a sound decision. This election is too important to vote emotionally and based on false information. If you don’t have any facts staniam, please don’t make an opinion.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

staniam: “eyes” is correct that Hillary knew it. I think everybody knew it-except the voters. And the nightly news audience still doesn’t know. She was getting crucified by her own party. I think the closest she got to spilling all of it was when she said “he is unelectable.”
St. Louis radio today is reporting Acorn voter fraud investigations. Robin Carnahan(whose entire family has supported Obama along with Claire McCaskill) was defensive. She said this should not be partisan. The host answered true, but it is the group supported by Democrats. She also said that we should all be glad for the investigation. Another guest gave a history of Obama and Acorn. Still it’s not the nightly news. What about all the early votes?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 10, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Stan….there are 12 states that are being investigated for voter fraud now, not 7.
And Marc 10…..50% of Americans are emotional voters and don’t care about facts….they vote on opinion….theirs. Facts can look like lies to alot of people.

Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Wow I don’t think Mccain/Palin ticket should be overstating anyones past judgements lest the “Keating Five Scandal and the Bridge to Nowhere” come right back at them and slap them in the face. I mean really check out Bill Ayers and how Ronald Reagan personally gave Ayers the highest honor a civilian can receive “The Presidential Medal of Freedom”. Now does that make Reagan a Terrorist?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

RL in Illinois
yea I talked last night about the respect I had for sen Jean carnahan whos dead husband beat ashcroft in 2000! If she supported Mcaskill… who I sent moneyto by the way… in 2006 then I thin a real investigation has to insue

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

staniam
The fact that you said we, shows that you are exactly what I said a loyal republican. People like you are the problem with this country. You are a typical ignorant voter that will vote based on a sound bite. You don’t understand political strategies vs. campaigning on issues. If you haven’t figured it out yet. Every politician has a past. I already know about Acorn. I don’t have to look it up. If it comes out factually that Obama knew about voter fraud, then he should not win and Mccain would be the best bet. Bet u and everyone else has to use their common sense.
Isn’t it funny that George Bush and John Mccain was for giving oil companies tax cuts that they didn’t ask for. Warren Buffett himself said that our tax system caters to the rich.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Now that is intelligence. That helps me to understand that 50% of voters are emotional. That helps me understand the strategy plays better.
Thanks

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Trust me. Anybody that is endorsing deregulation, or free markets with no oversight is a risk to our future. Getting rid of the oversights of the financial institutions was the KO shoot to the crisis. Please listen for deregulation hints. Ex. Mccain health care plans was to allow interstate health care. Interstate banking was one of the first steps of deregulation in banking. Mccain scares me when he talks about financial issues. He doesn’t know what he is talking about at all. We don’t need anybody out of touch with financial fundamentals.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

And as far as moral judgement……John Mccain cheating on his crippled wife that stood by him for all those years of his captivity…. Now that shows lots of great character. “Hmmmm I think I will cheat today because I can’t control my own body and desires.” John Mccain’s Inner Mind Working

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

The Presidential Medal of Honor was given by Reagan to Walter Annenberg… not to William Ayers.

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

You are correct Eyes, but hmmm have you looked at the supposed connections between Obama and Ayers…. Really nothing. Unlike the close personal relationship Mccain had with Keating himself. Close Personal friends.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Marc 10:
” You are mad at Barck for spanking Hilary, so you want to take it out on Obama”
I hope you grow up before November 4th!

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Exactly Eddie:
Let’s look at it like this. Offended ex-Clinton supports or soundbite fiends are falling for the Ayers foolishness and putting Obama on trial for being 8 years old when Ayers was foolish, but ignoring the Keating scandal were Senator Mccain was actually on trial for real for his real friend. (FACT) not politics

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Marc 10
all this happned when Obama was running for st senate in Il and obama as a st senator delivered money from the anneburg foundation to ayers who gave it to ACORN… enough said

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

staniam
No I don’t understand. Are you saying that because Ayers gave to Acorn and Obama took money from Ayers, that Obama is shady. I am not getting that relavence.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

stanim
do your history check. froad as you put it is not from the obama camp. do some research. would you rather have an educated man as president or someone that has cheated on the closest person to him and has told her he loves her thousands of times and then in her time of need he drops her like shes hot. ooooh and lets not forget his bad judgement in his savings and loans scandals of the 80s

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

eddie hilll
this is real fraud… Obama was the middle man with 50 million in mon ey granted by the anneburg foundation meant for education when it went to acorn and other groups… Ayers met with Obama in his living room when Obama was running for state senate considerable older than 8 yrs old I might ad… too bad you didnt get away with it but the jig is up woman

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

marc 10
I suppose you have proof of this obama annenberg money laundering thing you are spouting right?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Marc 10
Obama is the state senator that awarded the 50 million given by anneburg gto ayers how can you not understand that… that is a federal offnse to use the money other than what it was intended for

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

staniam
can you direct me to your research site on this situation?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

so mccain is clean and a saint? BTW

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Palin is also under investigation. George Bush will be under investigation. I am not bias, if Obama is wrong and factually showed to be wrong, then he will deserve judgment. Both you need to be open and lose the emotional judgment. Remember the Clinton’s had a sick passed. From getting some action in the white house, pardening criminals, land investorgations and remember I smoked but didn’t inhale. As a democrat, how are you voting for Mccain.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

eddie hill
jeez… just google ACORN… this thing is rolling its 11 states and counting… if Obama used them to get fraudulent voters out in my state in the primaries thereby runnign up the margin of victory you have a real problem… talking about wife beating or cheating or whatever wont fly here

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Marc 10
Obamas main fundraising arm is under official investigation in 11 states so far and that pales compared to cheatign that Pres Clinton did or Mccain being callous in the 1980s this is a federal offense

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

I am reading this article site you sent me, but let me ask you this. When did this report come out? Seriously do you really think Obama is a terrorist?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

>>
McCain was exonerated!
Obama’s close associations with Ayers which have gone on well over a decade…. were and are.. documented and confirm his worst nightmare!
He was guilty of inveigling funds from use for low cost housing to Ayers radical educational systems AS WELL AS
ELECTION FRAUD!
And if you can’t understand that taking money from the public’s funds and pocketing it for your own personal use ….. as … in A C O R N’s illicit activities… then you BELONG in Texas!
Do your homework…..

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Eddy
Obama is not a terrorist but a man who has a terrorist past has real connections to Obama and is leading the charge in the ACORN thing

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

staniam
Be serious we are not talking about cliton we are talking about the people running for president right now. I admit bill clinton was an ass, but didn’t you hate that then? and so what makes mccain different… other than he left his wife in the lerch. I admit I appreciate what mccain did in vietnam, but that does not mean I want that one running the country.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

now stan i am sure you are a very smart person. I can tell by what you say and how you say it, but lets be honest….please someone that is apart of an orginization that has someone else that had a very bad past does not make that person a terrorist. In fact I would bet Obama has a better understand of Americas history than Mccain. Look at his history. Yes he has made mistakes, but I feel less disturbed by the thought of an educated “rock star” running the country than the alternative

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

staniam
I read your republican article. So you are saying that you know that Obama funded Acorn millions of dollars with the signing of his pin? You are saying that his main campaign arm is under investigation.
Now, staniam I want you to understand the difference between political attacks and facts. Use your mind. If what you are saying is true, then Mccain is a weak and shouldn’t be president. The article needs to be fact checked because Mccain wouldn’t have passed up a game changer by not bringing up the Acorn scandal.
Also, Mccain only has 3 weeks to gain back momentum. Looks like you have some work to do.
Why did you say we, if you are a democrat.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Eddy,
Did you know that Obama taught the constiution? Obama is very learned in government affairs. Since the constitution is the blue print for running this country wouldn’t he be better suited to run the plays.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

eyes
don’t be close minded about this. Mccain was the only one with Close Personal ties to keating. In fact Mccain had received over 100,000 in polical contributions and his wife had various business dealings with the man as well. Plus personal trips at keetings expense in the Bahamas.For free? when was the last time anyone took you to the Bahamas 9 times for free?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

marc
yes i did know this and that is one of the many reasons I feel he is better suited for the job.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

well brothers and sisters I really enjoyed the debate and appreciate the otherside of the debate. But always keep in mind we are all in this together and no matter who wins I still feel we need to eliminate the party system and elect the INDIVIDUAL based upon their personal views and direction they truely beleive in and NOT what the party they are under subscribes to.
CIAO

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

marc 10
yes I see hatred and bigotry abound in most if not all of the advertisement and it really disturbs me. When you say something profound it is profound, but when exagerate the truth it is nothing but a lie in sheeps clothing. This happens on both sides, but when I look at mccain I see howard dean and that is a scary thought…..”boom boom boom iran?” you might as well call them one of the axis of evil. nobody likes to be refered to as the bad guy, but that is the one reason you dont do it. Remember “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.”

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Eyes:
You are so observant: But you don’t even wee how Mccain in his rush to win is lossing America. He doesn’t have the honor to calm his crowd down, when they are shooting kill him, and terrorist.
This is America and just because Barack is in the top two and could possibly be the next president, should demand good judgment by John Mccain.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

marc
when I see hate spewed I really hate it.ehehhe, but keeping a level head is what it is all about and I see very little of that in the Mccain campaign. I do not consider myself a Repulican or Democrate, but I feel I am just like most Americans someone that is a moderate and wants what is best for our country and I think both candidates do as well to one degree or another, but just have different views on how to get there. If you like the views of mccain go that way and if you like the views of obama go that way. But when you start saying terrorist and use a recent fear like that… well that is terrorism.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

I couldn’t agree more Eddy. He lacks prudence. He has an arrogance that is scary. A basic disrespect for people. He couldn’t even look at Obama in his eye. Even if Mccain became president, he should still conduct himself in a way that will allow him to work with democrats in the future. You don’t act rude to the main man and call him that one, when you will need the majority democrats senators and congress to have pass your bills.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am

marc
well said. I think these last few years of less government….ummm wait i mean more government and misunderestimated meism should be enough to sway people, but alas many are right when they say the average american is easily confused by slogans and lies played over and over and over again.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

What I don’t understand is how does Mccain say “Country is First” but picks his campaign first so consistently.
It is obvious Palin was picked to be a curve ball and a game changer vs. the next best republican to lead in case of Mccain’s death.
Was “Country First with picking Palin”
Country was second.
Foreclosures
Banks crashing
Bail out increasing higher taxes in the future
High Gas prices
A war in IRAQ
Bin Laden still Alive
And he picked Palin. Country was last his campaign was first. Mccain is self and to disassocaited with the people.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

one more thing have you ever noticed how people that represent themselves as staunch republicans always state when we have a good economy during democratic terms they always state it was due to the previous republican admin? That always confuses me. So who do we blam now?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

marc
yes i agree… did you watch as he announced his vp…. he was twitching and fumbling with his fingers like a school boy. This was not his choice, but the repulican party counter to Hillary Clinton and it worked great, but do we really want a community college grad as second in command. If people would stop looking at the rhetoric and research some of this stuff we would not even be having this debate. It would be mute… oh with a cutsy japanese girl smile and little slogan “say it isnt so joe”. Jesus I just about fainted and had to pull up some of my japanese videos just to realize that it was the real sarah palin and not some recording of my jlist videos.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am

I don’t here that in Texas. People say they are afraid of Obama. I am truely scared if Mccain becomes the president. Especially with how he ran his campaign.
Nobody knows the heart of a man, but if I read your non-verbals and watch your actions, I can probably get some type of clue. If you can’t respect your fellow co-workers and call them by respectful titles nor look your fellow- co-laborers in their eyes, then something is wrong with you. If I look at his country last campaign managment, then why would expect him to put me first when he is in office.
Anybody that is intelligent and fair will say that Obama got his VP right and Mccain got his VP wrong.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

eddy hill
ok I get it your an ultra conservative trying to goad us real democratsyour upset over the bailout thing and dont care if Mccain loses well you didnt count on Obama being a lightweight and accesory after the fact

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

Yes,
Mccain sold his soul for his selfish ambition. The same strategist that beat him up in 2004 was the same guys that he hired.
They beat him up so bad he began to chill with the dems for a second.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Marc 10
nope… Biden is what they call the senator from MBNA because the laws are lax there so thats where the creidt card companies make their home

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Marc 10
you two are just conservatives that will take your chances with Palin in 2012 or 2016 you have no use for Obama either

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

marc
unfortunatley many people vote due to their heart and not their head. Much of the vote goes to one side or the other is due to abortion rights and little about how they really feel. Many politicians (no suprise) really tell how they feel about such close personal feelings and this is due to the party system. I mean lets be for real if you think you will get a huge amount of votes just by saying yes I beleive this way or that… well what is a used car…errr i mean politician to do?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

The republican rallies remind me of WWF. Fake action. Mccain couldn’t even challenge Obama to his face like a man.
He didn’t want to risk the fact check.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

Marc10
honor is not calming a crowd down… you must be from the grass constituencuy… Obama wont legalize pot if hes elected he will be in enough trouble anyone who would even think of touching the stuff is morally bankrupt

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Eddy,
Back to smart conversation. I would be afraid of one party because that gets rid of the devil’s advocates. We need two parties for balance and due process.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

Marc 10
or another scenario is you are independants tryingto cause chaos and screw with democracy…. your obama days are numbered

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

marc 10
you didnt deny it… that kind of behavior is shamefull and inept and criminal and shall remain that way

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am

eyes extremely wide open
I considered ron paul after mccain because he has sent me the most mail and I didnt even sigbn up on a website

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

staniam
You are excited over the investigation. You act like you hope he gets caught for something. Can you please not show your clear silly, emotional bias? Wait until the investigation is done and then celebrate.
I am not worried because I am not on Obama junk. Look.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

I love it how Obama has the courage to go on conservative talk radio, conservative TV (Bill O’Reilly) and take on the very people who “don’t like him” face to face, yet Palin can only give interviews (when she ever does) to only those who agree with her politically.
McCain and his crew can level all kinds of charges against Obama behind his back, but as Obama recently pointed out, doesn’t have the GUTS to say it to his face.
That is cowardice, plain and simple.

Posted by: Charles | October 10, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am

eddy
black hawk down were a bunch of nuts with a beef for pres clinton… nope your not a true democrat…and I dont see mccain as a savior… but you see Obama as a pawn… its time to get all special interests out of washington

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

staniam
are you serious? how much cocain do you think bush has done? more than you can well imagine. and he is an idiot. lowest score on the texas national guard entry examine. give me a break. or are we looking at eh current running constituants?

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Charles
its not just out there several secs of state have come out today to uncover fraud

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:08 am 4:08 am

“He worked closely with Ayers on the Annenberg Challenge.”
No he didn’t. Ayers wasn’t even on the eight-person board of directors with Obama. Ayers had a part in setting it up, and did, I believe, attend at least some of the meetings (which were only quarterly) as Ayers still worked on the operations side of things I think. But ‘worked closely’? I think not.
“The New York Times did an indepth piece on his association with Ayers and concluded that Obama is playing down the extent of this relationship.”
Yes, it was a fairly indepth piece. And what did they also say? “Mr. Ayers played no role in Mr. Obama’s appointment” “… the two men do not appear to have been close.” Try reading the article yourself instead of relying on someone else’s out-of-context snippets from it.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

Eddy
Ok bush is stupid and he shouldve had to answer for going AWOL on the Tx National Guard or the DUI in Maine etc but Obama has gotten the same treatment byt he media when crimes might have been committeed and thee is eveidence that Ayers stil is close with Obama and obama did give ayers the money for acorn which was improper

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

Charles,
Palin nor Mccain will never go on NBC like Obama went to FOX. He clearly showed his intelligence to go against supper lying and bias FOX and agianst O’Reilly, which is very good and ask hard questions.
Mccain got beat up by Morning Joe, who is a Republican. That is a shame.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am

marc10
I think Joe is going sing a different tune this morning just watch

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

staniam
Nuts? so our military men and women are nuts? out there doing what is expected of them and giving everything. Hmmm I saw the pictures and it was enough to make me want to kill. But that is not what happened in this part of the world. Problem is there is no oil and that just does not make for good business now does it. Mccain is wrong and he is stretching the truth about everything, but forgetting about his own ghosts that are in his own closet. Really watch the next debate…. has Mccain been anything but a used car salesmen? My friends? That is the oldest trick in the car business my friends and lead into a banter about how bad the other person is and then without any truth to the next statement say MINE IS BETTER. Wow that is very thought provoking without any proof except is dishonest and scandalous past. History repeats itself and John Mccain will repeat himself.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

I am really want to see if he does. I actually like morning Joe. His show is actually the fairest. You finally said something that I like staniam.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

staniam
so we convict people of crimes we might have commited now. What is this Minority Report? You are guilty before you are found guilty. How about that sarah palin…. I said no to the bridge to nowhere….. she backed it untill it got kicked by the house.

Posted by: Eddy Hill | October 10, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Marc10
I like Scarborough even though hes a republican

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:24 am 4:24 am

Joe is not a punk. I like him. He hits anybody in the mouth. It is the only show that is unbias. If you go on morning Joe’s Show you better be ready.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am

marc10
yea I think Mika is obnoxious even though shes the daughter of Carters NSC advisor

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

ah Davis is finnally going to get whats coming to him.. they thought they ran out the clock …or maybe someone in the campaign with a conscience leaked the ayers connection

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

marc 10
there could be a problem…. theres one thing to fraudulently register someone but when they dont show up they dont vote! so Obama is behind in the polls by that measure and if hes not up by 6 pts nationally hes toast… I guesss thats what the padding of the voter roles was for eh?

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

staniam: Read your link. It doesn’t say what you think it says. E.g.:
“Ayers’ group chose Barack Obama to distribute the money”
Note first that it says Ayers’ GROUP chose Obama, not Ayers. That’s because Ayer’s didn’t personally choose Obama – just like the New York Times article says.
The second bit is just garbage though. Obama was one member of an EIGHT PERSON board. They collectively, not individually, chose how to distribute the funding. Of course, the article doesn’t mention that, despite it being a (glaringly obvious) fact.
Sheesh. That’s the best you could come up with?

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

aengil
its still being used for a different purpose than what what was intended and acorn hides contributions over $2300 to obama and ACORN was in fact responsible for the fraud in Indiana in the county near chicago where voter records were falisfied

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

you cant copy Ws tactics and expect to win … that can only happen twice

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Let me say one more thing. We can all thank staniam favorite person Hilary Clinton, for bringing up Ayers. Hilary is the reason we have people like staniam. Her poison is still alive and killing intelligence.
The Ayers story is not actually working according to the poles. The play on American ignorance is not a good bet when people are watching their 401k’s go south.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Posted by: Aengil | Oct 10, 2008 4:11:12 AM
nyt is in the tank for bho–like most msm. the annenberg papers are clear on the associaitons.
Posted by: Davis | Oct 10, 2008 4:18:16 AM
you forgot to mention bho’s relations with the sds, black liberation, and other socialist organizations.
Posted by: Eddy Hill | Oct 10, 2008 4:18:42 AM
actually, biden and bho voted for the bridge–twice!
Posted by: Davis | Oct 10, 2008 4:18:16 AM
actually i believe bho is the most un-american…actually, i do not think he is even american. if he is, he sure is working hard not to prove it.

Posted by: bl | October 10, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

marc10
youre confident that you will win despite the fraud…. I dont think you will

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

staniam
Do the math? If Acorn is pading votes, then who are the pading the votes with homeless.
Even if 100% of blacks voted, it will only account for 12% of American voters. Homeless votes would accountfor only 3% of the 12 percent. They said that they caught 1000 false votes. I am sorry staniam but 1000 votes is not pading. Acorn can’t account for the padding it is the economy that is padding his votes.
You have to use your brains not your emotions.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

bl
this is major fruad… Pelosi put together a deal for ACORN in the rescue package

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

marc 10
the polls have gotten closer since yesterday aand the problem isn t who will vote the problem is that you have fraud on your hands

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

I am not defending Acorn smart. I brought up the fact that 1000 is nothing when this raced will be decided by millions. You said padding votes. 1000 isn’t padding it is not even thread in a pad. Just use your brain.
Tell the truth you are a die are, straight ticker republican. LOL

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

Marc 10
it could be that obama gave the order because his campain gave millions to ACORN

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

marc10
idiot… that was 1000 in one precinct… there are 11 states under investigation and the judge in OH blocked the sec of state from closing the investigation so you are in deep trouble

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 5:09 am 5:09 am

Let me ask you another question.
If Mccain took money from Freddie Mac, and Barack took money from Freddie Mac, those that mean that they were involved with the credit crisis.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

marc10
we dont know he gave the order but we do know he gave Ayers the money for ACORN and his campaign gave moneyt o acorn

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 5:17 am 5:17 am

Look here my friend,
Because Acorn cheated, it doesn’t mean that Barack gave the order. The only evidence that they have is 1000 votes per distict that cheated. Until they get the order of who cheated, then you are foolish to draw a conclusion that hasn’t been proven yet.
Your best bet, would be to stop praying for his fall, and wait to see if first he is able to be proven as a partner in the Acorn scandal. Until you know, you will continue to accuse him without facts, which is foolish. Calm down and think with your mind not your emotions. It works.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

marc10
I read an article that said ACORN is responsible in some way for the credit crisis by forcing lenders to give lower rate loans to homebuyers

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

marc10
and you better pray that ACORN didnt cause the fraud with Obama money which is way more than 1000 votes in 11 states thats just the tip of th iceburg..these are bad people who are doing nothing of the sort as far as helping out low income people its afront organization

Posted by: staniam | October 10, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

we dont know he gave the order but we do know he gave Ayers the money for ACORN and his campaign gave money to acorn
(these were your words) ( I appreciate your truthfulness)
Now you say we don’t know if he gave the order, but all day you accused Obama and link him to Acorn without fact. Your entire case is based on a false conclusion form questainable information. Your conclusion is that Obama is in trouble because of Ayera and Because of Acorn, but you are also saying that it is proof of link in which Obama gave the order.
What if you were done like that?

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:26 am 5:26 am

If are a democrat. You are acting like a republican politian. Accusing and lieing on someone and spreading fear. The fear and smear campaign of staniam.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

staniam
Acorn could not have started the credit crisis. I have three degrees, economics, finance, and entrepreneur. I graduated top of my class and I still have all my finance books. Moral Hazard was understand for years. Think about what you saying. Bad loans to poor caused the bank crashes. That doesn’t even sound right.
Let me help you with the truth.
That fact that John said that Freddie Mac was the match that started the financail crisis, shows his great ignorance to basic financial understanding. The real start of the financial crisis was from deregulation that actually started under democrats with Bill Clinton under the interstate regulations of 1994 and the gramm lynch act of 1999. Those two acts alone increased risk for banking instititions because these acts allowed banks to be able to do business accross states and to get into risky financial vehicles like insurance, mortgage loans, and securities. Banks became to Big Too Fail and had the moral hazard of being backed by the FDIC. The republicans screamed for less government and free market enterprise with no oversight. Therefore banks jumped into mortgagees and subprimes with no oversight, which lead to failures and therefore the credit crisis we face.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 5:39 am 5:39 am

Obama thought Ayers was rehabilitated? Really? Obama then needs to argue that he doesn’t read the newspapers, and didn’t see the Chicago Sun Times article on Ayers in August of 2001 with a picture of Ayers stomping on a US flag or the NY Times article “No regrets” published on 9-11-2001.
And let’s remember how long Obama denied hearing any of Jeremiah Wright’s hatred before admitting that he lied.
Obama said that knowing Ayers was a reason to elect Obama to the US Senate.
Didn’t know Ayers?
Obama has a real problem with the truth.

Posted by: drjohn | October 10, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

STages of denial here. First Rezko was someone Obama had done maybe 5 hours legal work for. Then someone who had helped with a house purchase. On and on, as more connections were proved, finally Obama had to admit each one.
Here it is again with Ayers.
And with ACORN. Beginning with admitting only some slight connection. But more and more connections are turning up. Iirc Stanley Kurtz found some good ones.

Posted by: 1950democrat | October 10, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

Proof Obama is linked to ACORN?
Where does one go to school to get a degree in “Entrepreneur”?
Obama has been funding ACORN for a long time. He was their lawyer and their head trainer for a time. It may well be that they learned their practice of fraudulent voter registration from Obama.

Posted by: drjohn | October 10, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

The NY Times stated that McCain was kept on the Keating 5 so that the scandal would not appear to be wholly a Democratic one, which it was.

Posted by: drjohn | October 10, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am

105% of voters are registered in Indianapolis and 112% of voters are registered in Virginia.
That ACORN is really doing a bang-up job.
Wonder where they learned all this stuff?

Posted by: drjohn | October 10, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

Obama assumed Ayers had been rehabilitated. yea right! If you believe that one I have a bridge for sale.

Posted by: TLINTX | October 10, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am

I hope the media will follow Stanley Kurtz in finding what Obama’s other radical friends were doing that CAUSED the sub-prime crisis: bullying banks into making such loans.
See
“How a Young Chicago Litigator Helped Create the Subprime Housing Crisis”
And
“O’S DANGEROUS PALS” By STANLEY KURTZ

Posted by: 1950democrat | October 10, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

Ayers was voted CITIZEN OF THE YEAR in Chicago in 1997. People change. Bet you all think Johnny Cash is just swell. Put it to rest already. If the University of Illinois and the parents of students attending there have no problem with him being a professor of education, why would you? Something to hide your racism behind? As for Wright….what about PALIN having to go to a WITCH DOCTOR to have the DEMONS removed from her? He didn’t do such a good job, did he?

Posted by: Nancy | October 10, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Why oh why wont the media do their job that they get paid for? The lies keep coming but the media ain’t counting!! Brotha HObama thought Akers had seen the errors of his ways?Rehab for Akers? This is the same as saying you had nothing to do with ACORN yet you have your fingerprints on their coffers dude! You helped indoctrinate the Bozos’ in the Ways and Means of Voter purge and Bank bullying!Its my guess that you and your so called good intentions are the reason Fannie and Freddie took a hit making Welfare loans to non working Americans. HObama fiddled while America burned!!

Posted by: commrat72 | October 10, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Nancy….Nevelle Chamberlain signed a Peace Accord with Aldoph Hitler right before Hitler started bombing England. Nevelle came home and told his people, “There will be Peace in our time!” Hitler was also Time Mags “Man of the Yerr” also. BFD!!

Posted by: commrat72 | October 10, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Assumed he was rehabilitated. OK..right on, think we believe that lie? He makes it up as he goes along. PATHETIC.
Obama paid ACORN $800,000. to register new voters.
There is going to be a huge problem with the vote this year.. Obama needs to be investigated, he is sneaky and engaging in unlawful practices in order to win the Presidency.
Please report this story ABC.,

Posted by: ml | October 10, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

1950democrat: Stanley Kurtz is a sad hack. He pushed these stories before he had access to the records, then when he got access, he didn’t find anything so had to rely on innuendo.
As for your link, there’s nothing there. They’ve taken two snippets from one legal case, misinterpreted them, left a couple of glaring holes in their argument, and hoped no-one notices. For example, part of the statistics they dismiss refer to upper-income applicants, not ‘poor people’. They also left out all information relating to the applications having ‘similar financial characteristics and credit histories’. We’re not talking about refusing credit applications on the basis of property values here.
The worst part of it is the implicit argument that a legal case requiring Citibank to not discriminate racially was a factor in the crisis, which essentially amounts to, ‘the subprime crisis is the fault of those do-gooders forcing innocent banks to give dodgy loans to those no-good african-americans’. It’s simply untrue.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

ml: “Assumed he was rehabilitated.”
Well, what would you call it? Was he planting bombs when Obama met him? Was he a fugitive from justice? No. Was he a respected member of the community, a university professor of education, and an expert on educational issues? Yes.
I’d call that rehabilitated too.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

“The NY Times stated that McCain was kept on the Keating 5 so that the scandal would not appear to be wholly a Democratic one, which it was.”
Oh please. So McCain went along with that… why?

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Give me a break. Obama comes up with every excuse for his crazy associations and people buy it. Rezko was a “boneheaded” mistake. He never heard Wright say bad things about American ….oh, no! Now, he thought Ayers was “rehabilitated.” This man is a pathological liar. Can anyone think of a presidential election where the American people didn’t want to know about the character of their president? This is no different, and the relationship between Obama and Ayers goes to the heart of the character issue. In any other election if a candidate knew someone like Ayers is would be disqualifying. Why not now?

Posted by: katherine | October 10, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Obama on Ayers: “He’s just a guy who lives in my neighborhood.”
Obama on Rezko: “He’s someone I did 5 hours of legal work for through my law firm. I never even met him.”
Obama on Rev. Wright: “That’s not the man I knew. I never heard anything incendiary from the pulpit.”
How can anyone trust a word Obama says?

Posted by: marylou | October 10, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

As for the rhetoric at the McCain/Palin rallies:
It seems these things have been said within earshot of the media. The “sit down” comment was made TO a media cameraman.
It seems whoever made these comments wanted to be noticed by the media. Leading me to conclude there’s a waaaaay better than average chance that they’re Obama plants.
Why would the Obama campaign do this? In order to silence McCain/Palin’s bringing up Ayers at their rallies.

Posted by: marylou | October 10, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

marylou: Google says ‘Your search – obama rezko “I never even met him” – did not match any documents.’ Misquoting are we?
As for Rev. Wright, have you actually bothered to see what his sermons were typically like? He’s published books of them you know. But of course you haven’t, you based your opinion on the few snippets you heard and assumed all his sermons were like that.
If you had bothered though, you’d have found out that actually, they’re not typically incendiary at all.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

What exactly make Smerconish “conservative”? His wife is a major fund-raiser for Obama.

Posted by: tgibson1962 | October 10, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

People do need to bear in mind that Ayers is a professor, and was also appointed to the boards of these charities. Doesn’t that imply that people besides Obama considered him to be rehabilitated? Doesn’t it prove that there were plenty of people who considered Ayers worth having around? This is nothing but a FUD tactic by McCain – Fear Uncertainty Doubt.

Posted by: billthomson | October 10, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

you should be scared! I’m not buying his excuses for ALL his crazy associations. I’m a Dem, voting McCain. Obama is toooo involved with the terrorists in this world.

Posted by: joanna | October 10, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

” Obama is toooo involved with the terrorists in this world.”
Oh really? OK, name five terrorists Obama is personally involved with.
Note: college professors don’t count as terrorists.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Aengil, I stand corrected on the “I never met him” quote. Here’s the original Obama quote from the January 21st debate when Hillary brought up Rezko:
“Here’s what happened: I was an associate at a law firm that represented a church group that had partnered with this individual to do a project and I did about five hours worth of work on this joint project. That’s what she’s referring to. Now, it’s fine for her to throw that out, but the larger reason that I think this debate is important is because we do have to trust our leaders and what they say. … And consistency matters. Truthfulness during campaigns makes a difference.”
When later asked whether he had minimalized his relationship with Tony Rezko at the debate, Obama responded “Look, I was in a debate in which I’ve got 30 seconds to answer questions…”
As for my original quote, I was apparently getting my wires crossed with Nadhmi Auchi, part of the Obama/Ayers/Auchi triangle. And Obama didn’t say of Auchi, “I never met him” but “I have no recollection of having met him.” That lawyer-speak helped when it was proven that Obama attended a party thrown by Rezko in honor of Auchi.

Posted by: marylou | October 10, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Does Obama go around saying how can he believe in Jesus (or Mohammed)
when both lived 2000 years before he did?
Ayers was bombing when Obama was 8 years old, but that does not mean
that Obama does not believe in the politics and radical left Marxist
agenda that Ayers has been pushing all his life.
And Obama says he condemns the bombings that Ayers does, but does he
condemn the politics that Ayers pushes? To quote Ayers of himself:
“We have always been small ‘c’ communists in the sense that we were
never in the [Communist] party and never Stalinists. The ethics of
Communism still appeal to me. I don’t like Lenin as much as the early
Marx.”
Ayers in his Weather Underground days called for the establishment of a
“white fighting force” to be allied with the “Black Liberation Movement”
and other “anti-colonial” movements to achieve “the destruction of US
imperialism and the achievement of a classless world: world communism.”
Why was Obama working with Ayers who believed in that philosophy?
Answer: Because Obama shares similar views.
- Ayers pushes Marxist views.
- Rev. Wright pushed Marxist views through the black liberation
theology.
- Obama was attracted to these type people and their politics.
In his book Obama says that he went out of his way to have Marxist
professors as his friends and attend socialist conferences while in New
York.
The thing that ties them all together is a belief in Marxism.

Posted by: Zank | October 10, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Thank you, Jake.

Posted by: DKNY | October 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Jake Tapper: “In an interview with conservative Philadelphia radio talk show host Michael Smerconish today, ….”
“[C]onservative”? “Michael Smerconish”?
Michael Smerconish is NOT a “conservative”!!! FYI: Media darlings David “Gergen” Brooks, David Gergen, Andrew Sullivan, Kevin Phillips and the completely insignificant but repeatedly quoted “Republican” (i.e., non-Republican) Susan Eisenhower are NOT “conservatives”. They are not even “Republicans”.

Posted by: Tom | October 10, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Zank: “Why was Obama working with Ayers who believed in that philosophy?
Answer: Because Obama shares similar views.”
So… you think Arnold Weber, who was also on the Chicago Annenburg Challenge board of directors with Obama, is also a marxist? Even though he was a member of the Nixon administration, and has donated money to the McCain campaign?
Sheesh!

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Ayers was voted CITIZEN OF THE YEAR in Chicago in 1997. People change.
Chicago is a politician’s town – how many citizens of the year visit Hugo Chavez and participate on the Miranda International Center – and praise Chavez?
Obama and Ayers shared an agenda as they funded radical groups like ACORN in their grants to these organizations. ACORN is implicated in 15 states for fraud–that’s just this year- in years past, they’ve done their share to elect Democrat officials. Plus taxpayers fund their intimidation tactics (Saul Alinsky) in housing and other social activism. Oh yes, they forced banks to lend to people who couldn’t pay for the houses they bought and they called it ‘GOOD.” Good is not when you force others to do your will – and freddie and fannie are the result of such tactics. Predatory lending was definitely part of it, but so was activist groups like ACORN.
ACORN says they can’t guarantee a fraud free election, but they’ve registered over a million people this year including the Dallas Cowboys team in Nevada. Obama paid them $800,000 to get out the vote- he used the same Saul Alinsky playbook when he was an organizer in Chicago.
Is it guilt by association or guilt by participation?
Ayers and Obama through the Woods Fund and the CAC gave grants to radical groups (like ACORN) over academic groups–that is participation.

Posted by: pecanpii | October 10, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“Note: college professors don’t count as terrorists.”
Obviously, you never went to USC.

Posted by: len | October 10, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

marylou: In regard to your quote, note that Obama was responding to Hillary Clinton’s statement that Obama was “representing your contributor, Rezko, in his slum landlord business in inner-city Chicago”. Obama’s response accurately addressed the point of him ‘representing Rezko’.
As for the ‘Obama/Ayers/Auchi’ triangle, you’re kidding me right? Firstly, I think you meant ‘Rezko’, not ‘Ayers’, secondly, that’s not so much a triangle as a line, and a pretty fuzzy line at that.
When was it ‘proven’ that Obama met Auchi, exactly? I think you’re referring to two people – out of the 100 people who supposedly were there – claiming the Obamas attended the reception. As far as I’m aware, no actual details or actual proof has emerged regarding that reception. And that appears to be the sum total of any evidence linking Obama to Auchi. Well I’m convinced. Not.
Is your definition of ‘proof’, ‘believing who, and what, you want to believe’?

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

I’ts kind of funny that when a questionable characteristic of Obama is brought to light by the Republicans… like his lying about his association with Ayers and with Rezko….. their campaign has turned nasty.
BUT…
when Obama’s backers accused Palin of actually being the GRANDmother of Trig, and when his storm-searchers trekked to Alaska to find the dirt on a governor has won an 80 percent approval rating from her state….. that’s perfectly acceptable.
Keep on slurping the kool-aid guys……

Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | October 10, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

“Well, what would you call it? Was he planting bombs when Obama met him? Was he a fugitive from justice? No. Was he a respected member of the community, a university professor of education, and an expert on educational issues? Yes.
I’d call that rehabilitated too.”
If Daley is associating with an unrepentant terrorist, then Daley is in the wrong. So is UofC. And you know as well as I do that the only reason he’s not behind bars today is he got off on a wiretapping technicality. Ayer’s quote on being acquitted:
“Guilty as sin, free as a bird, America is a great country.”
Have you ever worked for a university? I have. An Ivy League university in fact. It is a different world, a far left world where far left ideology and political correctness rule the day. Just because someone works for a major university does not mean they cannot be an active socialist, communist or unrepentant terrorist. Those attributes will most likely get you ahead in that environment.
If Ayers was rehabilitated why would he say things in the New York Times on 9/11/2001 like:
”’I don’t regret setting bombs,’ Bill Ayers said. ‘I feel we didn’t do enough.”’
“So, would Mr. Ayers do it all again, he is asked? ‘I don’t want to discount the possibility,’ he said.”
Yeah, that sounds rehabilitated to me.
Maybe that Weathermen tattoo on his neck reminds him every day of his glory years. Maybe he’s very much still the same person, just a little more patient.

Posted by: Woody | October 10, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

It’s all about trust & character …
Let’s see … a war vet with a lifetime of service to his country (from a family with a history or service), or Obama & his radical 60′s terrorist has-been friends (who are now just 60′s radicals working from the inside), and a pastor that he listened to for 20 YEARS preaching whitey hate … 20 YEAR is a long time to not really know somebody.
No-brainer.

Posted by: DSM_CAL | October 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Aengil, you’re a good little soldier for Obama, but intelligent people know that Obama was indeed attempting to hide the depth of his relationship with Rezko. In fact, the true story only came out in dibs and drabs as needed – and there’s still much more beneath the surface than has seen the light of day. Which makes the rest of his quote about “trust” all the more interesting. But you’re right, I did mean Obama/Rezko/Auchi – and there’s a lot there if anyone in the media cares to dig for it. Which luckily for Obama, nobody does.
Bottom line: Obama can’t be trusted.

Posted by: marylou | October 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Obama’s “last eight years” is a red herring designed to absolve democrats…even SNL made fun of democrats’ involvement in the crisis…does he not get it? At least McCain admits it is a bipartisan issue…

Posted by: Wade | October 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Woody: It’s always entertaining when someone takes part of what someone says as verbatim truth, while simultaneously ignoring other things the same person said.
You’re picking and choosing from what Ayers has said. Ayers responded to the NYT’s reporting him as saying “we didn’t do enough”, stating the article was “deliberate distortion”. He stated he said he “had a thousand regrets, but no regrets for opposing the war with every ounce of my strength.” And he also said “My memoir is from start to finish a condemnation of terrorism, of the indiscriminate murder of human beings, whether driven by fanaticism or official policy.” That makes for a slightly more complex picture, does it not?
Bombing symbolic buildings in opposition to a war (particularly one as contentious as the Vietnam war) is always going to be a complex subject. It’s trivializing just to yell “Ayers! Terrorist! TERRORIST!!!”
But as for him being a terrorist now – what acts of terror is he committing, exactly, these days? Teaching?
I mean, what definition of rehabilitation are you working with? Should Obama have read Ayer’s mind to work out whether he was truly rehabilitated? Or, since as far as I’m aware he’s not telepathic, should he have looked at what Ayers was doing?
Finally, you said “Just because someone works for a major university does not mean they cannot be an active socialist, communist …” You are actually allowed to be a socialist or communist in this country. It’s not illegal. And if you think there’s a problem working alongside such people, well, you also said you’ve worked in such a university. Can I conclude that you, therefore, are a commie?
I didn’t think so.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

marylou: “there’s still much more beneath the surface than has seen the light of day”
How do you know that, if it hasn’t seen the light of day?
You don’t.
All we want are the facts, ma’am.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Someone posted how McCain is so great because he’s from militaary royalty, as opposed to someone who hangs around 60′s era terrorists. What B.S.! First, McCain is a punk, like Bush, who was born on third and thought he hit a triple. He was lucky to get an sppointment to Annapolis, because his high school grades stunk! He graduates near the bottom of his class, and if he was NOT the son of an admiral, would have been tossed out of the academy before the first sememster of his freshman year! he ONLY gets to go to flight school becuase of daddy and granddaddy, and crashed his first jet in training, then after getting his wings, crashed a plane flying home after an Army/Navy game. Then there’s the controversial incident on the flight deck of the USS Forrestal, where it’s alleged he didn’t follow proper procedures and “wet-started” his jet, making the situation worse. When he gets shot down, he again admits he didn’t take proper procedures to avoid being hit by a SAM in his autobiography! When he gets back from Vietnam, and stays in the Navy for another decade, he again crashes another plane! Then lets talk about his associations with right-wing, John Birch type groups, joining the World Anti-Communist League, led by a neo-Nazi former Air Force colonel, Johon Singlaub, an organization that backed right-wing death squads in a number of countries, very anti-democratic! Then there’s the Keating Five Scandal, and McCain was lucky to get a free pass on that one. McCain, the seantor who didn’t like regulating businesses in any way, shape or form, and totally for dismantling FDR’s New Deal business-regulating legislation that saved the consumer/taxpayer middle class and working poor, and saved the American business world from itself!
Finally Palin: connected with a right-wing wacko Alaskan Independent Party, whom she addressed earlier THIS year, a group allied with the Confederacy Party which wants the former Confederate States to be independent, and the so-called Constitution Party (a misnomer if there ever was one), which wants a Christainist USA!
GO OBAMA!

Posted by: L.D. Freitas | October 10, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Go read “Ayers Has Not Left Radicalism Behind” yesterday at ibdeditorial
Anyone who buys that ridiculous ‘I was 8 when he did a bad thing’ line is a gullible moron.

Posted by: Peter Verkooijen | October 10, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

jpt quotes The CHANGEling Obama:
“we’re teetering on a really, really bad situation.”
Uh, “teetering”? This from a person who voted to turn the US Treasury over to the financial corporations who are his major supporters?
Spoken like the vapid corporate figurehead he is.
Meanwhile, in San Francisco, somebody seems to have bombed the BART tracks, and the bomb squad was deployed in the Mission District, in a local news report which was never followed up.

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 10, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Obama’s relationship with Ayers has been close and long-term, stretching from as early as 1983 (when both were attending Columbia U. in NYC, working with the same faculty mentor and living within walking distance of each other) through the present. That relationship includes:
–1987 when BO was working as a community organizer for the Alinsky-style Developing Communities Project (DCP) and Ayers was a new assistant professor of education at the U. of Ill. Chicago Circle Campus, involved politically with the public schools crisis and looking to DCP as an ally.
–1988 when Ayers solicited Khalid al-Mansour to raise money for BO’s Harvard education. (Mansour, a Black Muslim (NOI), was a mentor to Black Panther Party founders and advisor to Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, one of the world’s richest men.)
–1989 when Ayers and his father Tom Ayers (very prominent Chicago businessman and former head of Commonwealth Edison) got Obama a job at Sidley Austin law firm, where Michelle was already working, as was Ayers’ wife Bernadine Dohrn, who apparently had been hired as a favor to Tom Ayers.
–1993 when Bill Ayers placed BO on the Chicago Woods Foundation.
–1995 when Bill Ayers made BO chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge through year 2000.
–1995 when Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn hosted the launch of Obama’s political career at their Chicago home.
–1997 when MO, who was then Assoc. Dean of Student Services and Director of the Community Service Center (CSC) at U. of Chicago, invited Bill Ayers and her husband, BO, then a senior lecturer in the University’s Law School, to speak at a University-sponsored juvenile justice panel at the CSC.
–1997 when BO prepared a book blurb for Ayers’ book.
–2002 when Ayers and BO again appeared together on a panel regarding intellectualism, co-sponsored by the Chicago Public Library.

Posted by: Susan | October 10, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Ayers rehabilitated himself
long ago and is now a
professor of education.
McCain still suffers from
imaginary POW trauma. He
was treated well as a POW
but has gone to extraordinary
lengths to fabricate torture
stories and has deceived the
public for 35 years to
build a political career
for himself.

Posted by: anon | October 10, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

“People do need to bear in mind that Ayers is a professor, and was also appointed to the boards of these charities.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 10, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Aengil,
I worked at the university for a little less than a year and left for various reasons, not the least of which was the political environment. I never collaborated with any socialists or communists on any boards.
See, this isn’t a matter of guilt by association with Obama and Ayers. It’s a matter of guilt by PARTICIPATION. An entirely different matter.
The lengths to which people will go to defend Bill Ayers is simply staggering. Ayers never refuted any quotation in the NY Times article. Not a single one. Sure, he didn’t kill anyone directly by pure chance. The bombs intended for Fort Dix most certainly would have killed many.
Again, he tries to make a moral equivalence between domestic terrorism, defined as creating terror among the populace by exploding bombs in public places, and American action in the Viet Nam war. It’s insane in my opinion but apparently you’re ready to sign up for that.
Of course being a socialist or communist is legal in the U.S. That’s what makes this country great, as well as the right to pair up with such people for six or seven years on “education reform”. But please don’t try to spin it as some virtuous act. Obama knew exactly who Ayers was, what his past was, and now, finally, claims he thought he was rehabilitated. If you believe that I’ve got some hot AIG stock to sell you.

Posted by: Woody | October 10, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

You know it’s funny I can’t understand how you McCain supporters conveniently ignore all of the mess created over the last 8 years. Maybe you enjoy suffering but “my friends” the majority of us need a new way and if you have a problem with us not wanting to dig a deeper hell for ourselves that is just something you are going to have to deal with. No one is going to ignore the mess this country is in. I’d rather a so-called “socialist” over a hell bating “rich only” club racist group of idiots any day. And for the poor people supporting this group I have no idea when you are going to wake up and realize that it is not a race issue in this country it is a class issue and if you don’t have the money you are not a part of the club. For the love of God, your skin color no longer gets you over unless you are green with 100 dollar bill stamped all over you! We are tired of suffering at the hands of these lunatics making this land inhabitable! Now maybe you need something to complain about and like to live on the streets scractching for food wishing they didn’t steal your retirement money but that is your business and I would like for you to keep it to yourself. We are not going to hell with you!
Obama/Bided 08-16!!!!!

Posted by: Past | October 10, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

You silly people act as if Obama was hanging out with this guy Ayers when he was 8 years of age bombing up the world! If Ayers is such a bad person, why isn’t he still locked up and why in the world would anyone let him teach at their college?
I bet all of you trying to make this man’s past an issue has some big ole skeletal bodies up on the shelf in your closet ready to bang a person in the head if they dared explore your past. Can this man let his past misdoings rest in peace? It was 40 years ago and you people are behaving as if it was yesterday! If this all you got? I mean for real this is truly a non issue. I would like to know the criminals you associate with!

Posted by: Past | October 10, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

The Republican veep nominee
is a secessionist. Her
husband is also committed
to making Alaska a foreign
country. It’s disgusting
to see people like them.
Both should be in prison for
life.

Posted by: anon | October 10, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Susan, Susan, Susan…
“Obama’s relationship with Ayers has been close and long-term”
No it hasn’t.
“both were attending Columbia U. in NYC, working with the same faculty mentor and living within walking distance of each other”
There are tens of thousands of people at Columbia U. Many of them will live within walking distance of each other, what with all working/attending the same location. They don’t have a close relationship with each other.
“–1987 when BO was working as a community organizer for the Alinsky-style Developing Communities Project (DCP) and Ayers was a new assistant professor of education at the U. of Ill. Chicago Circle Campus, involved politically with the public schools crisis and looking to DCP as an ally.”
You’ve got to be kidding me. You claim Ayers was ‘looking to DCP’? Let’s have details, what did he actually do? What did Obama do with Ayers then, hrm? Because from what you said there, you’ve got nothing.
“–1988 when Ayers solicited Khalid al-Mansour to raise money for BO’s Harvard education.”
Untrue. Obama attended Harvard with the help of student loans – he took out $42,753 worth.
“–1989 when Ayers and his father Tom Ayers (very prominent Chicago businessman and former head of Commonwealth Edison) got Obama a job at Sidley Austin law firm”
Untrue.
“–1993 when Bill Ayers placed BO on the Chicago Woods Foundation.”
Untrue. (Woods director Jean Rudd did that).
“–1995 when Bill Ayers made BO chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge through year 2000.”
Untrue. Obama was appointed by a group. Deborah Leff made the recommendation.
And so on.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Woody: “See, this isn’t a matter of guilt by association with Obama and Ayers. It’s a matter of guilt by PARTICIPATION. An entirely different matter.”
It depends on the nature of the participation. You participated with socialists and communists, not directly, but simply by virtue of working at the same facility as them. That doesn’t make you a commie, obviously. It depends entirely on the nature of the participation.
“Again, he tries to make a moral equivalence between domestic terrorism, defined as creating terror among the populace by exploding bombs in public places, and American action in the Viet Nam war. It’s insane in my opinion but apparently you’re ready to sign up for that.”
Actually, I disagree with it personally, but that doesn’t mean I think it’s insane. There is a lot of substance to such an argument. The point I’m making is simply that this is a complex issue.
“That’s what makes this country great, as well as the right to pair up with such people for six or seven years on “education reform”.”
And here we get to the heart of the matter. You have to look at the whole picture. You say ‘such people’, well, who else was on the board? What do the records show?
e.g. Arnold Weber, member of the Nixon administration, and recent donor to the McCain campaign, was on the board of the CAC with Obama.
How does that figure into your equation? Does Weber share Ayers beliefs too? Or is Obama a closet republican?

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Isn’t Palin supposed to be a Bible thumper or something? Well, she might try reading that book a little more carefully:
“I was a stranger, and you took me not in: naked, and you clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and you visited me not.” Matthew 25:43
“Bear with each other and forgive whatever grievances you may have against one another. Forgive as the Lord forgave you.” Colossians 3:13
I don’t know what kind of character Ayers is, but it’s pretty obvious he’s rehabilitated himself, given his current position as an educator, not that he was ever convicted of any crime in the first place.
Palin, AGAIN, is a hypocrit.

Posted by: Teri B. | October 10, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Aengil says,
“It depends on the nature of the participation.”
I couldn’t agree more. unfortunately I and the rest of the world are at a disadvantage because the details of the Obama-Ayers relationship are fuzzy. I’ll concede that point. But why are they fuzzy? Due to a lack of public documentation, Ayers refusing to talk and Obama changing his story from “a guy in my neighborhood” to “I assumed he had been rehabilitated”. My, how the story has morphed.
Ayers was the money man, Obama was his chairman, correct? Was not Obama personally selected by Ayers? That’s a pretty tight relationship at minimum. There are zero parallels to anyone else working on the board at the time. Even more spurious are claims that anyone who works at the same place as a socialist, etc., is guilty by participation. That’s pretty weak.
“The point I’m making is simply that this is a complex issue.”
Not to me. That’s the big difference here. There were thousands of Viet Nam war protesters and only a few who chose to bomb their own people and facilities. Ayers was a delusional, self-righteous ideologue, son of a wealthy and influential Chicago businessman who took it upon himself to terrorize the populace. What is so complex? Many, many people acted out to the point where they made a difference in national policy but did not go to his extremes.

Posted by: Woody | October 10, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

“If Ayers is such a bad person, why isn’t he still locked up and why in the world would anyone let him teach at their college?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 10, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

I just have this to say about associations with anyone you work with.
Any of you here, do you know what your boss does after work, or your fellow workers?
How do any of you know who or what you are associating with?
How many of you even knew the name Ayers until now?
Believe me, if that man was still a danger to anyone, would the feds allow him to be where he is now?
McCain was associated with Ayers as well through the founder Anningberg(sorry not right spelling)…
It is all smoke and mirrors.
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Bev | October 10, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

“Or is Obama a closet republican?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 10, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Ayers was never “locked up” or convincted of any crime, unlike Mr. Keating.

Posted by: Teri B. | October 10, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

“Believe me, if that man was still a danger to anyone, would the feds allow him to be where he is now?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 10, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Barack Hussein Obama “ASSUMES”… another bone head dicision..we dont need this man as our President…wake up USA!

Posted by: Alfred Butts | October 10, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Obama condemened the Reverends actions after much pressure so he admited to the man’s poor character.
He said he only knew Myers incidentally, but that was a lie. They worked together on boards and Obama funnelled money to him to fund his extremist school. Later he said he “thought he was reformed.”
Finally, he was closely associated with ACORN and we all know the criminal activities they’ve been involved in.
The bottom line. Either Obama has such poor judgement of characther that he UNKNOWINGLY surrounds himself with character of ill repute or he does it INTENTIONALLY.
Intentional or not. Obama is constantly surrounded by bad people and in the midst of curruption. Do you really want him to be our next President?

Posted by: Sharon | October 10, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Rehabilitated! ROFLMAO!
While Obama and Ayers were serving together on the Woods Fund, Ayers made his infamous, “I don’t regret setting bombs, I feel we didn’t do enough” comment published on 9/11.
Contrary to a meme being pushed by interested parties, the Weather Underground killed innocent people.
Brian V. McDonnell an officer with the San Francisco Police, was ripped apart by shrapnel Feb 16, 1970. He succumbed to his injuries two days later. Officer Robert Fogarty was permanently injured in the same blast. FBI mole Larry Grathwohl says Bill Ayers built the bomb, and that Bernadine Dohrn placed it on the station window ledge. Nyack, NY Police Officer Waverly Brown and Sergeant Ed O’Grady, along with Brinks guard Peter Paige, were killed in an armored car robbery that was a joint operation between the Weather Underground and elements of the Black Liberation Army in 1981.

Posted by: CrystalD | October 10, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

“I don’t know this man” – - terrorist Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, convicted slum lord Rezco, corrupt Franklin Raines, terrorist Bernadette Dohrns.
Americans now say about Obama “I don’t know this man”

Posted by: Rich Ng | October 10, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

“Was not Obama personally selected by Ayers?”
Open to question. “In fact, according to several people involved, Mr. Ayers played no role in Mr. Obama’s appointment.” – NYT.
Those several people might all be lying of course, or the NYT might be misreporting, but there’s no evidence that Ayers actually did appoint Obama, only speculation that he ‘must have’.

Posted by: Aengil | October 10, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

bev:
OBAMA…..is all smoke and mirrors!

Posted by: klondike kate | October 10, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Forty years pass. Ayers is teaching at the same university as you.He’s on several of the same commities as you. He’s a productive member of society.I would assume he was rehabilitated too. Nobody talked about him, cared about him, and half of America didn’t know about him.He didn’t threaten you, obviously wasn’t a problem for all the students and their parents. So what’s the big deal now? Dose John McCain want nothing to do with the Vietnamese? No one cares about Ayers. What happened to all the good Christians out there that believe in forgiveness? Oh ya, their standing at McCain rallies shouting racial slurs and kill him.

Posted by: Bea | October 10, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Yawn….

Posted by: Miki | October 10, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

All the Obama Haters. Look at your girl Palin. She is guilty of abuse of power. So really can’t be trusty.
Look like the Mavericks like breaking rules.

Posted by: Marc 10 | October 10, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.