Obama Now Rejects McCain’s Mortgage Buy-Up Plan
ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Rigel Anderson Report: Barack Obama’s top economic adviser criticized John McCain’s mortgage buy-up plan on Wednesday, saying it would cause the government to lose money by paying too much for bad loans.
McCain’s top economic adviser responded with a statement of his own in which he argued that Obama would "rather support a bailout of Wall Street than rescue Main Street America."
During Tuesday’s debate, McCain proposed devoting nearly half the $700 billion from the recent financial rescue package to buying troubled mortgages directly, rather than indirectly aiding the nation’s financial markets by buying up mortgage securities.
The Obama campaign’s initial reaction was a version of "me, too," and his press aides circulated a quote from last month when Obama had floated a similar idea while stopping short of formally proposing it.
"We could consider giving the government the authority to purchase mortgages directly instead of simply purchasing mortgage-backed securities," said Obama while campaigning in Clearwater, Fla., on Sept. 23. "In the past, such an approach has allowed taxpayers to profit as the housing market recovered. But, this is not simply a question of looking out for homeowners, it’s doubtful that the economy as a whole can recover without the restoration of our housing sector, including a rebound in the home values that have suffered dramatically in recent months."
But as more details about the plan began to emerge on Wednesday, Obama’s campaign shifted gears and came out against it.
Here are Tuesday’s dueling statements:
Obama-Biden economic policy director Jason Furman : "Senator McCain’s first response to this economic crisis was to say that the fundamentals of our economy are strong. Since then, he’s acknowledged that there is a crisis and offered multiple plans, sometimes conflicting. Last night, in his latest attempt to get it right, he threw out a proposal that appeared to give the Treasury authority it already has to re-structure troubled mortgages. But now that he’s finally released the details of his plan, it turns out it’s even more costly and out-of-touch than we ever imagined. John McCain wants the government to massively overpay for mortgages in a plan that would guarantee taxpayers lose money, and put them at risk of losing even more if home values don’t recover. The biggest beneficiaries of this plan will be the same financial institutions that got us into this mess, some of whom even committed fraud. Since this beginning of this crisis, Barack Obama has demanded that any rescue plan must protect taxpayers and ensure that they share in any profit once the economy recovers, and he worked to include that principle in the plan that passed Congress. John McCain’s plan to overpay for bad mortgages by handing taxpayer dollars over to big financial institutions is erratic policy-making at its worst, and it’s not the change we need to strengthen our economy, create new jobs, and keep Americans in their homes ."
McCain-Palin senior policy adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin: "By opposing John McCain’s effort to help Americans stay in their homes, it is clear that Barack Obama would rather support a bailout of Wall Street than rescue Main Street America. Unlike Barack Obama, John McCain doesn’t believe that working to keep Americans in their homes is ‘too costly’ and ‘out of touch.’ From his campaign’s comments, it is clear that Barack Obama would rather see the taxpayers’ money go to corrupt Wall Street firms like AIG than keeping Americans in their homes. If Barack Obama wants to defend using the taxpayers’ money to prop up Wall Street instead of keeping people in their homes and providing jobs on Main Street, John McCain is happy to have that debate. Barack Obama says he wants to protect taxpayers but apparently that does not include protecting their homes."

Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
Good for him.. we have been spending $500 billion a year of money we don’t have.. another $10 billion a month on Iraq that we don’t have.. Just did a $700 billion bailout with money we don’t have, and now McCain suggests that we dump another couple hundred billion that we don’t have. Unbelievable!
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Do voters look at this as a well-deserved bailout for them or an undue risk to taxpayers and even more obscene spending on a bailout?
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | October 8, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
If Obama rejects McCain’s plan about
mortgage buy-up….well the voters
need to reject Obama in november….
Best choice is:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 8, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
What would Ron Paul do? That is what I want to know.
Posted by: Jim | October 8, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Concerned American: there are many way s the US government can collect and pay for everything. One excellent way is TAX.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Obama never never had a solid stand on anything.
He said he didn’t vote for Iraq war, but at that time, he was not US senator yet; after he officially became US senator, he voted for YES.
Posted by: golfgirlusa | October 8, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
McCain is a socialist by supporting this plan. Liberal right!
Posted by: frank | October 8, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Of course. Obama the former Democratic Socialists of America member would rather give the homes away.
Posted by: geevill | October 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Obama=The True Conservative.
Posted by: JJ | October 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
how is this really fair? I could have gotten a ‘bad’ loan for a house I couldn’t afford, but chose to live within my means. Does this mean that the bailout will allow people who shouldn’t have bought the houses to stay in them for whatever they can pay? How does this help me? I pay taxes too? This will end up dropping the bottom out of house prices for the hard working people who purchased a house they could afford. Shame on congress for this policy and John McCain for supporting it! Is this like HUD? Why can’t I get a half million dollar, six bedroom house for interest only then let the government allow me to pay off a $200,000 house because it was a ‘bad loan’. Thanks to this practice, I won’t be able to get a home loan until this crisis is over – banks won’t lend money to anyone right now!! How is this ok? What do the rest of us get out of this? NOTHING
Posted by: citizen | October 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
– Concerned American: there are many way s the US government can collect and pay for everything. One excellent way is TAX. –
Exactly, and yet McCain wants to cut taxes across the board and keeps proposing more spending. That is why Obama has a better chance at closing the gap. McCain seems to think we can just keep borrowing forever.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
And 3 of Obama’s advisors on the economy(Raines, Howard and Johnson) are the same guys who cooked the books at Fannie Mae and started this whole fiasco…its real smart to listen to them guys.
Posted by: lucylinc | October 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
McCain’s plan is simply not a good idea…Why attack Obama for not backing a horrible idea…McCain clearly did not evaluate his plan to conclusion.
Posted by: lanawonders | October 8, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
– He said he didn’t vote for Iraq war, but at that time, he was not US senator yet; after he officially became US senator, he voted for YES. –
He was very vocal about his stance against the war when he was an Illinois senator. And how can you vote ‘YES’ to something that has already occurred? Time travel?
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
So $300 BILLION MORE IN TAX DOLLARS to buy bad debt is McCain’s version of a “spending freeze”?
And he said both of these ideas about ten minutes apart.
The man is so out of touch he doesn’t even know what he is saying.
All he says is “I know how to…”
Apparently McCain’s version of “change” means changing the meaning of words.
Posted by: Dave in PA | October 8, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
– If Obama rejects McCain’s plan about
mortgage buy-up….well the voters
need to reject Obama in november…. –
Nicholas, (and geevill) please explain?
Are you guys just so in love with whatever McCain says, or just so anti-Obama that you would voice the opposite regardless?
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Ha Geevil,
YOUR guy just suggested a $300 BILLION government buy out!
Who’s the “socialist” again?
Your too funny!
Hahahha.
Posted by: Dave in PA | October 8, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
– its real smart to listen to them –
Lucylinc.. you might want to check out your ‘facts’ about economic advisors.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Golfgirl,
Get real. Either you know this and just rant BS, or you are completely naive. Either way, pretty lame.
Obama voted to support our troops who had already been deployed and make sure they have what they need. As he should.
That is NOT the same as voting to go to war in a country that never posed a threat like McCain did.
Posted by: Rachel | October 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
The deal has changed. As a former Hillary supporter I finally decided to support McCain as a leader with grit. I’m now turning against McCain because of the detestable behavior of some of McCain’s followers. When the crowd starts saying that Obama is a terrorist and to kill him, that’s where I draw the line. I will now commit to Obama as a matter of principle, to take a stand against the ugliest of right wing hatred. Given this development he is clearly the right man for the Presidency at this time in history.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 8, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
This is amazing. McCain’s plan would primarily benefit middle class, older retirees, low income people who got subprime loans, refinanced and now have seen their home values plummet. If Wall street is getting a pass, why not these groups on Main St? After all I thought he wanted to help those on Main street.
Another issue, if the economy is so important, why has he not considered who would be his treasury secretary (if he became president)? Did he really give it more than a passing consideration? Does he believe Paulson is doing a fabulous job or is he relying on Nancy Pelosi/Barney Frank to do the recommendation?
Posted by: Really? | October 8, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
OBAMA SUPPORTED bailing out Wall St. Billionares! Now he wants to “stick it” to the little guy, WTF???
Posted by: hmn | October 8, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
I am exhausted from following the flip flopping Obama does. He never seems to have his own ideas and I can not believe no one sees that. He always comes out a day or two later saying what McCain has already said, he just twists the words around.What is he going to do as President? Wait for everyone to speak first so he can twist it into his own words or sit and ponder every night over the events of the day before he forms an opinion or act. We may need our President to act quicker than that and what if his advisors aren’t around ?
Posted by: conf1689 | October 8, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
– I am exhausted from following the flip flopping Obama does. He never seems to have his own ideas and I can not believe no one sees that. He always comes out a day or two later saying what McCain has already said, –
Huh? McCain says bailout, Obama says no.
I think you are watching a different program than the rest of us!
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Concerned American: another way to raise revenue and pay for everything is to revive the economy and collect more taxes without raising taxes.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
– This is amazing. McCain’s plan would primarily benefit middle class, –
NO, it would benefit idiots who were irresponsible with their purchases, and it would be at the expense of those who were responsible with theirs.
Buying bad loans was what caused the financial crisis to begin with, and now McCain wants to repeat it, and with money we don’t have!
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
JOHN McCAIN IS AN IDIOT!!!
John McCain wants to OVERPAY for bad mortgages by handing taxpayer dollars over to BIG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS which got the homeowners in trouble in the first place, with no guarantee that the financial institutions will do anything different in the future.
Plus there is ALREADY a provision in the current $700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT BILL that INTELLIGENTLY deals with bad mortgages.
So John McCain is trying to use this pathetic unintelligent plan, to try manipulate people, and only stupid people will fall for it!!
Posted by: Lisa | October 8, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
– Concerned American: another way to raise revenue and pay for everything is to revive the economy and collect more taxes without raising taxes. –
Yes indeed, I’m glad someone sees it! Obamas tax plan would provide an immediate injection of capital to stimulate the economy. And his health plan would provide a double boost.. first by providing an additional estimated $140 billion in tax savings to companies providing health insurance to their employees, allowing them to create more jobs and increase production. Secondly, the increased number of insured Americans would boost revenue to health care providers, which would be further stimulus to create more jobs and have a ripple effect to other supporting market segments!
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Concerned American: Careful with the term “ididots”. Some of them are Democrats who McCain is trying to assist in times of economic turmoil.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
McCain is too old for the job. Plus he’s a loser.
End of story.
Posted by: Vicki | October 8, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
– Concerned American: Careful with the term “ididots”. Some of them are Democrats who McCain is trying to assist in times of economic turmoil. –
Democrat, republican, it dosen’t matter. There is a provision in the bailout bill that will deal with foreclosures. McCain just wants to buy bad loans and renegotiate the terms. Those people are not losing their homes to foreclosure, and an undervalued home is not causing a turmoil. Their house value may have gone down, but they are still living there and if they just stay put, those values will eventually rise, at which point they can either refinance or sell for a profit.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Welcome back West Coast!
Posted by: Dave in VA | October 8, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Vicki what has age got to do with it? Obama is younger, does he qualify for the top job? This job requires experience and resposibility. MCCain has both.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Obama is such a loser! He has learned to say what people want to hear but in no way does it resemble what he is or what he intends to do. Right now, he and Ayers are being looked into for their criminal activity in ACORN. More Chicago criminal action. This country does NOT deserve this. We’ve been hit with way too much from the dems, financially and criminally.
Posted by: Ann | October 8, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Hey Concerned American
I’m an ex-democrat.I left the party
when Hillary dropped-out from the
race…..I’m anti-Obama……
Obama is an opportunist,fake and an idiot…..He has no real power and his
own party members don’t like him….
If he gets elected[i hope NOT] he will
create more problems in this country,more than we face today….Also
he will be a backfire to blacks…..
Remember me…….
Best choice is :
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 8, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
– This job requires experience and resposibility. MCCain has both. –
Both? He may have experience with the military, but he has shown several times just withing the last month or so that he is irresponsible and tends to overreact.
Obama has acted rationally and intelligently, and shown the kind of judgment that most respect in a leader.
Throw in their positions on the issues that really matter, and the choice becomes even easier.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
– I’m an ex-democrat.I left the party
when Hillary dropped-out from the
race…..I’m anti-Obama…… –
Then you are not voting for McCain, you are voting against Obama.. which is irrational and one of the reasons we wound up with 8 years of a numnuts in office.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Have you seen the “exclusive interview” by Sean Hannity with McCain & Palin?
What a JOKE!! Hannity fed them easy questions and it sounded like he was giving them a chance to continue the debate, except without Obama there. That’s the only way that stinking ticket can win a debate. Hannity KNOWS the facts about who raised taxes and on who (millionaires). Yet when palin again brought up the “94 votes to raise taxes”, Hannity didn’t question the facts. The facts are that the 94 votes were not all to raise taxes, less than a quarter of them were to raise taxes, and then only on people making $1million or more. Anyone reading this make that kinda scratch?? When asked about Ayers again, they brought up old news and Hannity didn’t even ask about Palin’s husband being part of the radical group that wants to secede from the union. Why??
The facts are that the McCain will keep repeating their lies because they think that the more they repeat them, the more the voters will think they are the truth! If I were assigned to McCain’s ship, I would mutiny because of the marbles he always has in his hand because the sound of them hitting each other calms him down!!
Hannity is a conservative lap dog, nothing more, nothing less. He is not a responsible journalist! Responsible journalists will ask TOUGH questions that BOTH sides will have to answer, not just the candidates that his keepers want to appear “truthful”.
Posted by: Desert Storm Veteran | October 8, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
McShame is trying to screw us again!! I am not an economist, but what McShame is trying to do is enrich his rich friends again!! He wants the government to pour another 300 billion to buy all those bad mortgages, but because the government cannot own these mortgages, he has to sell it to the lowest bidder, who as we all know are his friends. Thus the banks holding these mortgages will sell it to the government at the current high unsustainable rate. In turn the government has to unload it, and the same McShame friends will then buy it back at the lowest bidding rate. So these banks sell high, then buy it back low. Then they will complain that they are on the brink of bankruptcy, and ask the government for another BAILOUT, using our hard-earned money. So the 300 billion spent by McShame will now be down the drain and another 600 billion will have to be spent bailing out these same bankers. All of them enrich themselves, including McShame!! BIGGEST LOSERS?? We, the American people. SAY NO TO MCSHAME!!!
Posted by: Sareena Jones | October 8, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Planting Seeds of Disaster: ACORN, Barack Obama, and the Democratic party
You’ve got only a couple thousand bucks in the bank. Your job pays you dog-food wages. Your credit history has been bent, stapled, and mutilated. You declared bankruptcy in 1989. Don’t despair: You can still buy a house.” So began an April 1995 article in the Chicago Sun-Times that went on to direct prospective home-buyers fitting this profile to a group of far-left “community organizers” called ACORN, for assistance.
At the time, however, that 1995 Chicago newspaper article represented something of a triumph for Barack Obama. That same year, as a director at Chicago’s Woods Fund, Obama was successfully pushing for a major expansion of assistance to ACORN, and sending still more money ACORN’s way from his post as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Through both funding and personal-leadership training, Obama supported ACORN. And ACORN, far more than we’ve recognized up to now, had a major role in precipitating the subprime crisis.
…
Another factor working in ACORN’s favor was that its increasing success with local banks turned those banks into allies in the battle with Fannie and Freddie. Precisely because ACORN’s local pressure tactics were working, banks themselves now wanted Fannie and Freddie to loosen their standards still further, so as to buy up still more of the high-risk loans they’d made at ACORN’s insistence. So by the 1993, a grand alliance of ACORN, national Democrats, and local bankers looking for someone to lessen the risks imposed on them by CRA and ACORN were uniting to pressure Fannie and Freddie to loosen credit standards still further.
…
Up to now, conventional wisdom on the financial meltdown has relegated ACORN and the CRA to bit parts. The real problem, we’ve been told, lay with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, however, ACORN is at the base of the whole mess. ACORN used CRA and Democratic sympathizers to entangle Fannie and Freddie and the entire financial system in a disastrous disregard of the most basic financial standards. And Barack Obama cut his teeth as an organizer and politician backing up ACORN’s economic madness every step of the way.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjRjYzE0YmQxNzU4MDJjYWE5MjIzMTMxMmNhZWQ1MTA=&w=MA==
Posted by: LightSeeker | October 8, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Nicholas |: If only there were more like you, and there are. Hillary supporters are going for McCain. The problem lies in Obama’s past links.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Hey Concerned American
I’m an ex-democrat.I left the party
when Hillary dropped-out from the
race…..I’m anti-Obama……
Obama is an opportunist,fake and an idiot…..He has no real power and his
own party members don’t like him….
If he gets elected[i hope NOT] he will
create more problems in this country,more than we face today….Also
he will be a backfire to blacks…..
Remember me…….
Best choice is :
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | Oct 8, 2008 9:27:30 PM
Nice specifics you have there on not voting for Obama… lol. You are all pathetic. McCain has less than a 10% chance to win. Get used to saying President Obama.
Posted by: Chad | October 8, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MY VOTE AND A REPUBLICAN VOTING FOR MCCAIN IS THAT I’M VOTING FOR MY CANDIDATE!
Posted by: Matt | October 8, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Bad mortgages are only part of the problem, a big part of the problem, but not the only part of the problem. The current bailout plan already includes the purchase of bad mortgages. But how about the millions of people who have lost, and/or are in the process of losing their retirement savings which have been invested in stocks? While you’re handing out money, McCain, please reimburse my parents’, grandparents’, and my retirement funds.
Posted by: Voting Obama/Biden '08 | October 8, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
– Nicholas |: If only there were more like you, and there are. Hillary supporters are going for McCain. The problem lies in Obama’s past links. –
Tenuous links to individuals pale in comparison to the direct involvement and support of terrorists that McCain has. Funding and arms support for the KLA, sitting on the advisory board of the US council for World Freedom, their ties to the overthrow of the Nicaraguan government with brutal and savage methods, ties to the Iran-contra ordeal. McCain has had his hands in more clandestine, covert and government subverted terrorist activities over the years dating back to Regan than most people realize.
Give me a break!
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Concerned American
Yes i’m voting against Obama……
Joe Biden said on primaries that
Obama is un-fit for commander in chief.
Just think of it…..Now Biden is VP..
Conclusion:Dirty politics……
I won’t come to the democratic party
untill they clean-up the dirt….
Best choice is:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 8, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Concerned American,
I’ve noticed you spend a great deal of time using logic and trying to explain basic economic priciples.
While your efforts are certainly valiant, I think I can help you.
You just need to put a waving flag behind you, play the star spangled banner, and say a few psuedo-patriotic platitudes with the word “freedom” thrown in couple times. Then they will believe anything you say.
That way, you won’t be bogged down in all those pesky facts your using now.
Just a suggestion.
Posted by: Dave in VA | October 8, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
– Just a suggestion. –
And well taken :)
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Just a thought…
Obama is pushing for jobs. If people had money they’d pay their bills and buy things. Banks would get paid. We’d hire more people. Create more jobs. Sell more houses.
If that 700 billion got into the hands of the needy, seven people would have touched,(or been touched by) every dollar.
Trickle down NEVER worked.
CHANGE must start at the bottom and work up!
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | October 8, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
John McCain served on the board to the U.S. chapter of an international anti- Semitic group that supports ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America. John McCain is a terrorist sympathizer who condones the murder of innocent civilians.
It’s true, see for yourself at usatoday.com
Link: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-10-07-mccain-iran-contra_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip
Posted by: Bobba | October 8, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
I’m a life long Republican, but this new bailout proposed by McCain is absurd! Why should I have to pay for people who made bad decisions in their home loans! McCain is going off the deep end.
We should have elected a REAL conservative!
John McCain is a fake; and I’m seriously torn between Obama and McCain now.
Btw the rest of you Republicans quit throwing around Ayers. You’re not changing anyones mind and it just looks desperate when we have watched the dow drop 1800 points in a WEEK! Who gives a crap about Ayers! That doesn’t tell me how either candidate will help fix this!
Posted by: Matt | October 8, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
lucylinc wrote:
“And 3 of Obama’s advisors on the economy(Raines, Howard and Johnson) are the same guys who cooked the books at Fannie Mae and started this whole fiasco…its real smart to listen to them guys.”
Sure, like it’s really smart to listen to someone who doesn’t even know that Raines, Howard, and Johnson are NOT Obama’s advisors on the economy. Check out on Snopes.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/fanniemae.asp
Posted by: Jean | October 8, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
I’m so tired of McCain and his SOCIALIST programs!
Posted by: Oh the irony of it all | October 8, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
This is money that’s already in the mortgage bailout package passed recently. What McCain proposes is a sensible plan to fix the mortgage mess created by Fannie/Freddie and their paid-for buddies in Congress, like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barack Obama. And as many economists have suggested, given the long time frame the government can wait, we will probably at least break even in the long run if not make a profit. Putting the economy back on a solid footing is worth the investment and, yes, the risk.
This is not a bloated program that will spiral out of control like, say, Obama’s health care plan. I hope those who have tried to push the mistaken notion that McCain does not understand the problems of the middle class and has no solutions to offer them are chastened. But I know they won’t admit he has a plan to help the struggling middle class.
Posted by: Moderate | October 8, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
When you think about it, McCain has been voting for pork barrel since he’s been in Wash. D.C. How’s that you say??? Well, every year, EVERY YEAR, when the budget goes to congress, there are BILLIONS of $$$ in pork barrel projects included. There’s no way around it! If the budget doesn’t get passed, the government shuts down!! If McCain were a “true” maverick, he would have been voting “NAY” to EACH budget proposal that went before congress!
But that’s just me.
Posted by: Desert Storm Veteran | October 8, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
The next president is going to be confronted with enormous problems. He will not only have to deal with the US economy but with international affairs. Russia, North Korea, Iran, South America, just to mention a few hot spots. Can Obama deal with all these? I sure hope so.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
WestCoastMessenger regarding your comments. although i have no proof i was not there but many people have come forth claiming that the rally chanters were in fact obama supporters trying to turn mccain events into an opportunity to use the race card.
last night one posters stated that friends in the audience in albuq had seen the same people protesting mccain prior to disrupting the event. like i said this is what is being widely shared including people who were there and sent emails. i personally don’t know but will reserve judgement. i assume the chanters are under investigation and we should find out because that is pretty serious stuff.
Posted by: linda o. | October 8, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
JOHN McCAIN IS AN IDIOT!!!
John McCain wants to OVERPAY for bad mortgages by handing taxpayer dollars over to BIG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS which got the homeowners in trouble in the first place, with no guarantee that the financial institutions will do anything different in the future.
Plus there is ALREADY a provision in the current $700 BILLION DOLLAR BAILOUT BILL that INTELLIGENTLY deals with bad mortgages.
So John McCain is trying to use this pathetic unintelligent plan, to try manipulate people, and only stupid people will fall for it!!
Posted by: Lisa l | October 8, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
When you think about it, McCain has been voting for pork barrel projects since he’s been in congress. How’s that you say??? Well, every year, EVERY YEAR, when budgets go before congress, they (politicians) slip in BILLIONS of $$$ in pork barrel spending.
There’s no way around it! if McCain were a “true” maverick, he would have voted “NAY” to EACH budget proposal that went before congress because of pork barrel spending. Why hasn’t he?
But that’s just me.
Posted by: Desert Storm Veteran | October 8, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Nice specifics you have there on not voting for Obama… lol. You are all pathetic. McCain has less than a 10% chance to win. Get used to saying President Obama.
Posted by: Chad | Oct 8, 2008 9:38:59 PM
=======================================
Did you say 10%???????????
You must be out of your mind…..
The race is wide open……..
Don’t underestimate the silent vote,
the bubba vote,and the redneck vote…
Did you watch PBS news hour today????
The voters in OHIO,PENNSYLVANIA,FLORIDA
said:they will not vote for a black
man……..
Best choice is:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 8, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
To concerned American:
Obama has his own 500 billion plan.
Obama has a 1 trillion more in spending plans.
McCain wants a freeze on any other spending.
McCain voted against the massive drug company medicare bill.
Obama voted for it.
McCain voted against giving tax breaks to oil companies.
Obama voted for tax breaks to oil companies.
McCain wants to reform the earmark process, Obama doesn’t.
Obama wants a 1 trillion socialized health care plan, McCain doesn’t.
Obama is being treated like a King by the media.
Posted by: Jeff | October 8, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
McCain has dementia and i do not think he realize it. How can he say that he buy all the bad home loans, US goverment not to cut spending, not to raise taxes, bail out Wall street and to continue supporting the war in Iraq and NONE – i mean nada – for any sort of tax hike. Where is he getting all this MONEY from? please can he tell us probably we are looking at the wrong places.
Posted by: Nyori | October 8, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Linda O,
You raise an interesting perspective certainly worth looking into. I was hasty to react, I’ll have to move back to a position of reserved judgment. It’s getting harder to get the truth every single day.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 8, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Cant any of you dopes read? McCain said the 300 bil would come OUT OF the 700 Bil bailout package. If you ObamaBots would open your ears you would have heard McCain say that this would be to deal with the mortgage holders to help people STAY in their homes.
Posted by: NubTail | October 8, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Change you can believe in alright,
obama changes his mind so often who bothers keeping track anymore?
Like McCain said, pinning the guy down on what he really believes is like nailing Jello to a wall.
What does bombo think about Pelosi’s pledge today– she may reconvene Congress and force them to pass yet another stimulus bill, this time to the tune of $150 BILLION on top of the $850 BILLION just passed. Does she know of a money supply that Joe-Public hasn’t been told about?
Posted by: American Mama | October 8, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
– Obama wants a 1 trillion socialized health care plan, McCain doesn’t. –
I won’t bother addressing the rest of your nonsense, but do want to correct you on this; both Obama and McCains health care plans cost roughly the same..
According to the Economic Policy Institute, McCains would cost $1.3 trillion over 10 years, Obama would be $1.6 trillion over the same time period.
However, Obamas would insure more americans and be more efficient, save businesses an estimated $140 billion a year, and provide increased revenue to the health care industry simply due to a 47% increase in number of currently uninsured Americans (compared to 7% at the peak of McCains).
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Any prudent investor, whether it be for one house or a bunch of houses bundled up in “securities” know that you don’t overpay for devalued assets. Obama is on point and I’m glad someone’s going to be in the whitehouse that uses good old fashioned common sense!
Renegotiate those mortgages so that people can stay in their homes and the banks that forged signatures on docs lose THEIR premiums. Stop making the little guy pay for the big wheeler-dealer’s mistakes!
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 8, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
WestCoastMessenger. i share your concerns on many levels regarding your original post on this issue. i was also a hillary supporter. but the more i see and learn about obama the more i become inclined to watch and listen very carefully. the acorn issue where all acorn offices in critical swing states are under investigation for voter fraud has alerted me to be even more cautious in my final choice.
Posted by: linda o. | October 8, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Jeff: Obamas health plan is not socialized. he wants to create an insurance company, that is all.. and participton is optional. if you have insurance, you can igonre it.
Posted by: johnny | October 8, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
McCain better get used to saying to Obama “yes sir, No sir, hurts sir, help me sir, thank you sir, good night sir, good luck sir, how is your family sir, did you sleep well sir, can you help me sir” This thing will not be decided by skin color everybody is hurting. I see many toothless white ladies, Jose six packs, and wonna be Britney spears hanging in the streets looking for away out and hurting. The economy is gone south for everybody and at tis critical moment, maybe a black man is going to help us get out of this mess created by “WHITE GUYS” HAHAHAAHAHA how ironic.
Posted by: joel | October 8, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
– obama changes his mind so often who bothers keeping track anymore? –
Please cite a relative example
(and then be prepared to hear a list of McCains changing winds of politics)
Posted by: Concerned American | October 8, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
……and the answer is: put a 18 month moratorium on foreclosures and let the lender and the home owner get together and re-due the mortgage so it is comfortable for both…..One less family out on the street, one less home dumped on a swollen market,
the buyer and lender figure it out between themselves and THE GOVERNMENT STAYS OUT OF IT !!
I know, too simple right? duh
Posted by: Billy7 | October 8, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Pelosi wants another stimulus package of 150 Billion. You got to love those Dems. Another sign of the great minds and workings of the Dems. They are in fact the ones who pushed the now defunct 700 Billion dollar bailout with money we don’t have and now want to spend more. This is the change we have to look forward to..
Posted by: dragonfly777 | October 8, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
To Nicholas, Concerned American, and who ever else:
I, too, am a former Hillary Supporter,
I, too, was a democrat until this year.
I am FOR McCain.
Unlike HIspanics, for whom obamama is their third choice (After Richardson and Hillary)… McCain is actually my second choice.. HIll was my first, always and forever.
McCain tho is the only one left in the race who has integrity, honor, honesty, and has earned the right to be President.
Obmama is some freakoid, with a stoopid name noone can spell, onaomaoma, soaama, omsama, oingoboingo,
and he is waaaaaaaaay lying !!!!
Posted by: American Mama | October 8, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
westcoastmessenger-imagine where i stand i have a gay son, and i am a hispanic woman and a life-long multi generational democrat/hillary supporter. i just really do believe that mccain is sincere in his effort to serve the country.
he may have wacko supporters anti gay, and outright racist against hispanics) supporters that are extreme. but obama likewise has EXTREME supporters as well. so i often have to weigh these issues as well especially when i hear racist rants it hurts but i move on and think of the bigger picture like who is committed to this country.
Posted by: linda o. | October 8, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Why can’t the goverment dumb all the 700 billions into Fannie and Freddie and then ask both of them to refinance all the homes at 2% or there about (i mean all homes not a select). I mean even at 2% or there about is interest meaning that the goverment is not loosing any money but making money at 2% interest. This way, we will have people stay in their homes and there will be a rush for people wanting to buy which will reduce the inventory that is causing all this problems. I think there is something that we do not know… and help us God that one day we know what was going on. I mean this is no Rocket science.
Posted by: Nyori | October 8, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Is McCain going to renegotiate my home loan too? Yeah, right… Is he going to use my tax money to buy up crap at top dollar? Absolutely.
I thought it was the most socialistic crap I’ve heard in ages and I couldn’t believe a Republican was spewing it.
Posted by: 1percenter | October 8, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
How can Biden sit there and support Obama when he said all those negative things about Obama?
How can the Clintons do the same, support Obama whenthe attacked him so vigorously?
It must have something to do with Democrat logic. Or they were lying?
Posted by: Kottaras | October 8, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
American Mama–wouldn’t you feel safer right now if the race was between Hillary and McCain? I have to say McCain was my first choice. But at least Hillary has experience, isn’t a radical liberal liar, and I know that if Hillary was ahead in the polls over McCain, our country would still be okay and I wouldn’t be so worried right now.
Obama is a complete unknown, untested and untried. He agrees with the views and even seeks advice from his cousin, Raila Odinga in Kenya, a muslim who is known for stealing elections and his radical views. In fact, if you look up Odinga, a lot of his political tactics are the same ones used by Obama.
Posted by: S Adams | October 8, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Just heard McCain said that 300 billon of Mortgage Buy-Up is to come from the 700 billon.
Obama said he rejects this plan because he didn’t come up with it first. Main Street first.
Posted by: mama | October 8, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
I can’t wait for PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA. You all suckers and haters will have no choice. This country is moving ON with or without you. BETTER GET USED TO IT OR ELSE MOVE TO ICELAND.
Posted by: kaniu | October 8, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I’m a McCain supporter, but do not agree with the mortgage buy outs. Enough is enough. We have bailed out the dirty democrats and wallstreet with the $700 billion. Banks and mortgage companies need to be held responsible for these homes. They need to work with the homeowners and renegotiate the home loans. That should have been a stipulation in the bailout instead of the 20% going to Obama’s voter fraud organization ACORN and other pork spending.
Posted by: S Adams | October 8, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
mama-if that’s true, it would make more sense than doing a separate bailout.
You’re right also, If Obama doesn’t come up with it first he rejects it. What an ego this guy has!
Posted by: S Adams | October 8, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Is Barack going to change “White house” to “Main House” i hate how Whites glorify themselves in everything. ICANT WAIT! BINGO he has my vote
Posted by: MAMA | October 8, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
People like us who pay our bills and have a small savings in the bank, will be paying for the people who got in over their heads and for the greedy profit seeking paper pushers. Let people refinance or re-do their loans so the children have a roof over their heads. But don’t be giving away our tax money to buy votes!!
Posted by: TLmule | October 8, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Like it or not there’s going to be a bailout.
So it all depends on who gets bailed out — Wall St. or Main Street.
Once again, it’s the big talker versus the big doer.
Just keep Obama talking between now and election day. Listening to Obama is like going back in time — to when the BS smell first parted from the bull’s behind.
And for additional laughs keep watching the former Hillary supporters twist, turn, and wiggle to try and ease their cognitive dissonance over supporting Obama.
Posted by: dom | October 8, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Nice try, Sen. McCain, but really anyone can see that it’s too expensive for too little and, what’s more, it’s going to benefit Wall Street at least as much as Main Street. The McCain plan, as I see it, bails out Main Street but also allows irresponsible lending to go unpunished by paying Wall Street the difference between the original loan value and the new, much lower loan that the government has negotiated with the homeowners.
There are many ways to help Main Street keep their homes without giving away so much tax money to Wall Street. The government just has to come up with an incentive plan that costs far less than $300b that induces/ encourages mortgage lenders to re-negotiate loans or re-set interest rates, etc.
This is just another example of McCain jumping to the extreme to try to solve a problem that he is unfamiliar with. Calm down, Sen. McCain. We are feeling dizzy enough.
Posted by: chris | October 8, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
S Adams Yup heard this today.
Obama will change his mind about this tomorrow and say it was his idea.
Posted by: mama | October 8, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
s adams the way i understand it the buy-up would be part of the 700 hund billion bailout money allready allocated-but instead of it going thru a profit making mortgage firm the negotiations would be directly with the homeowner and the government who would own the title. maybe i have it wrong?
it would take the houses off the market and allow people to keep their homes?
Posted by: linda o. | October 8, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
mccain’s mortgage plan is another empty bailout,your tax money paid directly to the banking monopolies that started this mess. Until we create millions of good paying jobs to replace the out sourcing by our big corporations no one will have the money to make mortgage payments of any size. The only way to restart this joke of an economy is to create millions of good paying, productive, honorable JOBS
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
s adams the way i understand it the buy-up would be part of the 700 hund billion bailout money allready allocated-but instead of it going thru a profit making mortgage firm the negotiations would be directly with the homeowner and the government who would own the title. maybe i have it wrong?
it would take the houses off the market and allow people to keep their homes?
Posted by: linda o. | October 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Exactly Linda that is the way McCain and his surrogates said today.
So people can keep their homes.
This is the same thing Hillary said she was going to do during the primaries.
Posted by: mama | October 8, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
THE BUY_UP IS JUST A BAILOUT BY ANOTHER NAME< AND NO THE MONEY WOULD NOT COME FROM THE FIRST 700BIL CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU HEAR, IS'T SPOKEN FOR–AIG? MO MO IT'S YOUR TAX DOLLARS GIVE THEM TO A BUNCH OF GREEDY MEGA BANKS-OR INVEST THEM IN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY JOBS AND REBUILDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE=MORE JOBS. TO THE BANK BLACK HOLE, OR TO SOMETHING THAT WILL BENIFIT US ALL
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
THE BUY_UP IS JUST A BAILOUT BY ANOTHER NAME< AND NO THE MONEY WOULD NOT COME FROM THE FIRST 700BIL CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU HEAR, IS'T SPOKEN FOR–AIG? MO MO IT'S YOUR TAX DOLLARS GIVE THEM TO A BUNCH OF GREEDY MEGA BANKS-OR INVEST THEM IN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY JOBS AND REBUILDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE=MORE JOBS. TO THE BANK BLACK HOLE, OR TO SOMETHING THAT WILL BENIFIT US ALL
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
THE BUY_UP IS JUST A BAILOUT BY ANOTHER NAME< AND NO THE MONEY WOULD NOT COME FROM THE FIRST 700BIL CONTRARY TO WHAT YOU HEAR, IS'T SPOKEN FOR–AIG? MO MO IT'S YOUR TAX DOLLARS GIVE THEM TO A BUNCH OF GREEDY MEGA BANKS-OR INVEST THEM IN ALTERNATIVE ENERGY JOBS AND REBUILDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE=MORE JOBS. TO THE BANK BLACK HOLE, OR TO SOMETHING THAT WILL BENIFIT US ALL
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
None of you listened to the debate with an open mind. John McCain does not think of bailing out the homeowners, he considers it a RESCUE. The banks have huge debt created by two Democratic Presidents by the name of Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and with the help of Senator Barack Hussein Obama’s vote. McCain wants to RESCUE the homeowners. In addition, I will betcha you that most of those homeowners are Democrat.
I own all my properties FREE and CLEAR of any debt. The higher prices for goods created by Obama’s taxes and the Wall Street BAILOUT will create even more of a burden on the homeowner. I agree with McCain that we must give more money to people to spend to open up the economy.
Obama changes his position more times, than most people change the sheets on their bed. He is the most flip flap presidential candidate in the history of the popular vote.
Obama is out of touch with reality. Obama wants to put Americans back to work with building bridges and building roads. Obama sounds like he wants public works projects like during the years of the CCC, WPA and Workfare. Unions considered such programs as slavery.
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 8, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Fellow Democrats, as President-to-be Obama would tell you: Now is the time….Vote early and Vote often!
Posted by: Mr. Democrat | October 8, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Fellow Democrats, as President-to-be Obama would tell you: Now is the time….Vote early and Vote often!
Posted by: Mr. Democrat | October 8, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
AIG was a failure of the Democrats. Point of fact, AIG only needed a bridge loan to go back into profitability. The Democrats acted to quickly by closing down AIG. This is more of a reason for Democrats to stay out of banking and business.
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 8, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
the way i understand it the plan sounds better than anything else that has been proposed. the housing market is bloated, that in itself will keep the value of houses down. the sooner these houses are taken off the market the sooner the market will recover. the excess ‘bad loan houses’ are a drain on the housing market. allowing homeowners to renegotiate their loans will keep milllions in their homes.
we may not like the idea that people should not have engaged in risky home loan plans and that we end out at least temporarily paying for their mistakes, i get that part but it is more important for people not to become homeless which will only end out costing us even more to support them. at least this way they have the incentive of home ownership as a reason to keep their jobs.
Posted by: landsend | October 8, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
truth do you know the difference between PERSONAL income tax and capital gains of corporate tax? obama wants to raise taxes on the rich, ok? that’s people who earn over $250,000. NOT corporations. that is not in the tax plan you think you know about. the health plan scare, the rise in prices scare- i wonder where that stuf comes from? where did you hear about this? who is using scare tactics and personal attacks because they have NO positive me4ssage for us
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Why is Hussein rejecting McCain’s plan–is because he didn’t think of it first? TOO BAD! That’s what he gets for always trying to copy other people and never having thoughts and ideas of his own. Lack of experience coming back to haunt him. He copied Hillary Clinton all throughout the primaries. I guess he had to give his answer first this time which didn’t afford him the opportunity to copy McCain. Ha, ha, ha!
Posted by: steelwaters | October 8, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
John Mkkkain is not a racist!!!!period.
Posted by: Adams | October 8, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
so does obama have a plan of his own so we have something to compare mccains plan to or is this just more political posturing and negative attacks while the homeowner is facing foreclosure.
Posted by: landsend | October 8, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
The new McCain proposal he came up with in the debate, about housing mortgages is a good deal for the banks. Here”s the deal: The difference between the current value of the house and the original mortgage will be paid to the bank, BY YOU. Then the homeowner gets a new mortgage at the new lower value of the house now. You get nothing back. The bank is happy. If the mortgage was sold to a bank in Iceland, some guy named Sven Aalsberg is happy. Your tax dollars are out the difference. If the house was financed for $300K and is now worth $200K,
your tax dollars make the bank, or Sven Aalsberg, in Iceland, whole and happy.
That”s the McCain plan. Pork for bankers, at your expense.
Vote Obama 08.
Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 8, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
what’s is the matter with this picture if you are not a millionair it does not benifit you dump asses to vote repubicans mcain look and act like barney fife there is no way we should be putting more money into his friend pockets don’t they have enough from the last time they screwed us it stated with regan at least with bill clinton we had money now messing with them damn bushes we are broke again come america lets get real we had the money to take care of all this crap that they are talking about doing i read some of the commint that you guys wrote go back to school or have your ears check and your eyes because mcain is not a good choice unless you are just plan stupid.
Posted by: a new change | October 8, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
what’s is the matter with this picture if you are not a millionair it does not benifit you dump asses to vote repubicans mcain look and act like barney fife there is no way we should be putting more money into his friend pockets don’t they have enough from the last time they screwed us it stated with regan at least with bill clinton we had money now messing with them damn bushes we are broke again come america lets get real we had the money to take care of all this crap that they are talking about doing i read some of the commint that you guys wrote go back to school or have your ears check and your eyes because mcain is not a good choice unless you are just plan stupid.
Posted by: a new change | October 8, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
The new McCain proposal he came up with in the debate, about housing mortgages is a good deal for the banks. Here”s the deal: The difference between the current value of the house and the original mortgage will be paid to the bank, BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS, putting the USA into further debt and reducing the buying power of the dollar. Then the homeowner gets a new mortgage at the new lower value of the house now. THE USA taxpayer gets nothing back. The bank is happy. If the mortgage was sold to a bank in Iceland, some guy named Sven Aalsberg is happy. Your tax dollars are out the difference. If the house was financed for $300K and is now worth $200K,
your tax dollars make the bank, or Sven Aalsberg, in Iceland, whole and happy.
That”s the McCain plan. Pork for bankers, at your expense.
Vote Obama 08.
Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 8, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
you can’t bail out a bunch of out of work home owners- pour more tax dollars into the financial black hole and expect positive results. 700 bil already but look the stock market is in a nosedive. why they know this is not going to work. the only way to turn the economy is create jobs fund alternative energy. you think that’s a little nothing industry? with the funding there are thousands of potential jobs, and we can become energy independent.we need these things and they produce positive, tangible results. desperately need to rebuild our national infrastructure .we do not need to pour more tax dollars into a bottomless pit
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
All taxes filter down to everyone. It is unreal to think only a certain group will pay a tax and you will be tax free. Barack Hussein Obama’s tax is unreal.
I know the different taxes. I have been buying securities since 1965. You better wake up to reality.
Posted by: Truth | October 8, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
for all of us dumb blogers look at google find the spell check tool
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 8, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
The stock maket is in a nose dive because of the fear factor. It is beginning to present excellent buying opotunities.
Posted by: Truth | October 8, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I STILL DON’T HEAR WHAT OBAMAS PLAN IS. at least mccain brings something to the table that may not work but at least he is discussing the issue-while obama is just complaining and attacking.
Posted by: landsend | October 8, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Some of us are muti-tasking and are not the best at typing, Mr. Perfect.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
The stock market is in a nosedive because of the fear factor. The stock market is beginning to present excellent buying opportunities. Is that better, Mr. Perfect?
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
McBush and Friends Ideas that Lead
the World to the poor House…
I think McCain wants to Bankrupt
the world to bring about a one World
Government…..
But I think the world might just get
really tired of His crap!
Posted by: Anita Yova | October 9, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
truth what alternate universe do you live in? AIG is NOT closed down- republican treasury GAVE the money to them, and now like a bad version of poltergist they ARE BACK asking treasury for MORE.
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 9, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
PM
Is Barack going to change “White house” to “Main House” i hate how Whites glorify themselves in everything. ICANT WAIT! BINGO he has my vote
Posted by: MAMA | Oct 8, 2008 10:33:58 PM
=====================================
NO,NO,NO….He’s going to name it…
“Black House”……it’s NOT funny..
Best choice is :
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 9, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
well truth why don’t you just jump in? you might think about the d word first
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 9, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
┏┫ ┏┓ ┏┓ ┣┓ ┃┃
┗┫ ┃ ┣┛ ┏━━┻┃Obama/Biden 08!
┃ ┗━━━┛ ┃ ┣━━ ┃
┗━━━┳━━━┛ ┣━━ ┃
┏━━▇▇▇━━━━━┻
Posted by: Simmen | October 9, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Nyori has a point. why not refinace all the mortgages at 2% with the 700 billions. Good idea. The worthless papers/securities that banks/investors hold would be worth something again too.
Posted by: Adalberto | October 9, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
obamas jobs plan sounds like a strange world where you are preselected based on skill level, aptitude, and age. then you get sent off to CAMP to perfect your skill so you can perform your assigned duty to the state, like a robot.
then at night we all come home to our little cubicles and eat our allocated rations. no thanks, am i the only one that this is kinda weird.
Posted by: landsend | October 9, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
truth i don’t know where you came up with that tax philosophy but prove it back up something you spout. you know what that sounds like is a bastard child of Regan trinkle down economics
Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 9, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Yea whats McCain going do for Iceland
we have Bankrupted one of the Richest
Nations on earth… Maybe we could
Sell them a Bridge to No where…
and then buy it back from them….
Just trying on McCAIN NEW WORLD ECONOMY
MCBUSH IF YOU MAKE A MISTAKE JUST
MAKE A BIGGER ONE AND BLAME THE DEMS…
IDEAS YOU CAN BELIEVE IN …
Posted by: Anita Yova | October 9, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Maybe McCain should have spent some of that suspended campaign time to actually read and understand the bill he supported.
Posted by: Miki | October 9, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
the way it has been presented by the media 90% of americans are making their home loans-so we are only talking about 10% who are not. i also don’t get the talk about the job market. maybe i am missing something but everybody i know has a job. i have a job and i have to turn down overtime at least once a week. my son has a job, my daughter has a fulltime and a part- time job and she just bought a new home in phx and is not falling behind on her home loan and neither is anybody i know. i think we are getting fed allot of bull to scare us into bailing out the fat cats, and to justify the higher cost of all goods, taxes etc…
Posted by: landsend | October 9, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Food for thought for liberals living in LaLa Land:
Bush has been in office 7 1/2 yrs. The first 6 years were great because we had:
-Consumer confidence standing at 2 1/2 yr high
-Gas was 2.19/gal
-unemployment rate was 4.5%
-Dow Jones hit a record high at 14,000+
But American’s wanted “change” so in 2006 they voted in a Democratic congress and yes we got “change” all right:
-Consumer confidence plummeted
-gas $4.00/gal
-unemplyment rate 5.5%
-home equities drop
-1% of homes in foresclosure
-Dow is dropping a new low everyday
-$2.5 trillion has evaporated from stocks, bonds and retirement funds
Meanwhile the Democrats have been caught with their hand in the cookie jar.
President has no control over these issues only congress. What has Congress done? NOTHING
Now we have a Democratic candidate that wants to continue these “changes”.
We might as well vote in the Democratic Congress collectively as president, what’s the difference?
A vote for Obama is a vote to continue the Pelosi, Reed, Dodd, Barney Franks policies.
God help us!
Posted by: S Adams | October 9, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
It is when business and banking cannot operate with freedom; it is the same as closing down business and banking. Banking and business do not need government watchdogs. The Democrat banking bills by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are the direct result of the banking and the stock market crisis. The Democrats did not permit the banks to use their strict guidelines for credit. Government must get out of banking and business.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
You guys are crazy to vote again for the republican, hell that’s why we are in this shape now, 401k down the drain, jobs ship over seas, forclosed homes, high as hell college fees, high cost of food, gas, and health insurance, I guess someone have to knock you guys upside your head. Do yall even have a clue? And now yall want to talk about Acorn, hell the republican have stolen there way in the white house the last 2 terms, give me a break, there was a surplus, and now we owe so much it is a damn shame. And now you want Mcsame and dump dora in the white house PLEASE!!!!!
Posted by: wane | October 9, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
the talk about car loans and car dealerships not being able to borrow money to grow their inventories was a turning point for me that we are being totally sc***** i mean who in their right mind would want to buy a new car right now given the fact that alternative energy option vehicles are coming on line and the price of gas is prohibitive and unreliable. american automobile manufacturers have not evolved they keep producing gas hogs that no rational minded person would purchase. let them crash or evolve or let the oil barons bail them out. this is about systemic failure on the part of the american business community for which we should not have to pay. but when it comes to stupid people who made poor choices in buying a home we must help, the alternative is homelessness and even more $ to support them.
Posted by: landsend | October 9, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Just like a Barack Hussein Obama supporter to resort to name-calling. Barack Hussein Obama does not have one quarter of President Reagan’s intellect.
Trickle down taxing is a know fact. I suggest you educate yourself and stop leaning on others.
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
why ABC don’t report these 3 things:
1) It’s game changer, McCain said to bail out home owners.
3) Obama will NOT put health care as top priority. During debate, he said he can not do energy and health care at the same time.
3) Biden already admitted during VP debate that they could not keep some of the promise.
Posted by: golfgirlusa | October 9, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
wane,
Finger pointing is fine, as long as you point to the guilty party. Go back and see when our economy started going into the dumper. Maybe, ……2006 ring a bell, Democratic congress, Pelosi, Reed, Franks, Obama, any of these names ringing a bell?
Bush’s hands have been tied for 2 yrs, he can not pass anything without the congress approval. In 2006, McCain warned Congress about the Fannie Mae problem and the Dems told him he was being an alarmist. Meanwhile the Dems were all benefitting from Fannie Mae. Get a clue dude.
Posted by: S Adams | October 9, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Barack Hussein Obama is smoking heavily during the present national emergency and he has flip flopped only twenty times. He will soon reach a decision, but there goes another cigarette and another flip flop.
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
landsend–good point, maybe the automobile manufacturer’s will be forced to make every car fuel efficient. You know they have had the technology to do it for years.
Posted by: S Adams | October 9, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Vote for Obama and select your work program.
The smoking habit shows Obama is a weak-minded person and that he cannot take mental pressure, not even the pressure of running for president. Obama appears to be a nervous irascible person that would find it difficult to make quick accurate decisions concerning national emergencies. He would probably smoke four packs a day, during a horrific national emergency.
The national healthcare program must have anti-smoking for all persons because smoking causes many diseases and premature death. A cigarette-smoking president cannot ask taxpayers to have healthy habits to lower medical costs. Obama fails to be a leader by surrendering to the smoking habit.
DR. Everett Koop reported that nicotine addiction is equal to a heroin addiction.
The reason being that both nicotine and heroin cross the blood brain barrier.
Obama sets a bad example for young people, and that is difficult to forgive.
Vote for Obama and select your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
s adams they will change if we stop buying their cars and get by with what we have for now or buy used cheap cars. petro fueled cars as we know then are on the path to becoming ART CANVASES and recycled medal. small compact energy efficient cars are the only way.
do you remember when the govt was giving huge tax breaks for buying hummers that was stupid.
Posted by: landsend | October 9, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
People in COLORADO, INDIANA, OHIO, MICHIGAN, NEVADA and NORTH CAROLINA… Regardless of who you’re voting for, please double check to see if you’re REGISTERED TO VOTE! You may have been removed from rolls just like thousands of others. Tell your family and friends to check if they’re still registered too!
Here’s the story:
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The New York Times.
The actions do not seem to be coordinated by one party or the other, nor do they appear to be the result of election officials intentionally breaking rules, but are apparently the result of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the states tried to comply with a 2002 federal law, intended to overhaul the way elections are run.
Still, because Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately. The screening and trimming of voter registration lists in the six states — Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina — could also result in problems at the polls on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion, long lines and heated tempers.
Posted by: ES | October 9, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
People in COLORADO, INDIANA, OHIO, MICHIGAN, NEVADA and NORTH CAROLINA… Regardless of who you’re voting for, please double check to see if you’re REGISTERED TO VOTE! You may have been removed from rolls just like thousands of others. Tell your family and friends to check if they’re still registered too!
Here’s the story:
Tens of thousands of eligible voters in at least six swing states have been removed from the rolls or have been blocked from registering in ways that appear to violate federal law, according to a review of state records and Social Security data by The New York Times.
The actions do not seem to be coordinated by one party or the other, nor do they appear to be the result of election officials intentionally breaking rules, but are apparently the result of mistakes in the handling of the registrations and voter files as the states tried to comply with a 2002 federal law, intended to overhaul the way elections are run.
Still, because Democrats have been more aggressive at registering new voters this year, according to state election officials, any heightened screening of new applications may affect their party’s supporters disproportionately. The screening and trimming of voter registration lists in the six states — Colorado, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Nevada and North Carolina — could also result in problems at the polls on Election Day: people who have been removed from the rolls are likely to show up only to be challenged by political party officials or election workers, resulting in confusion, long lines and heated tempers.
Posted by: ES | October 9, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Ask one simple question. Can you afford to Obama’s policies? You will be paying for them.
McCain’s policies are right and affordable.
Posted by: Kottaras | October 9, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
West Coast Messenger…are you for real? You didn’t want to support Obama because you were a Clinton supporter and now that you don’t like the way McCain’s people respond you are going for Obama? Do You base your decisions at all on what you think is best for your situation and the country or only on the gut feeling you have about who is the ‘good guy’?
Posted by: Benny | October 9, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson’s had big oil interest in 1967 and he did not want the public using any technology that would interfere with his special interest.
http://www.autopuzzles.com/Indy1967.htm
Vote for Obama’s policies and choose your work program.
Posted by: Truth | October 9, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Mc CAIN’S Latest ERRATIC BEHAVIOR:
the NEW AND IMPROVED
REPUBLICAN COMMUNIST PARTY
Posted by: Andy | October 9, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
How much you want to bet that if this was Obama’s plan the Libs would be hailing it as a great Humanitarian effort and a brilliant way to fix the economy?
From what I gather McCain is talking about using X billions to cover the losses of the bad mortgages, not the complete value of the mortgages, that is, not 100%.
I agree with many here…if I forget to pay my mortgage, I get a nasty phone call…oh, and a letter. I can’t run to the government.
But, this is a Socialist-inspired, Democrat mess and along with Republicans to afraid to speak out (we can see why…recently Barney Rubble Frank accused those attacking this bit of failed Democrat/Socialist engineering as racists-BTW, how exactly does this knucklehead keep getting re-elected?).
Where is the free enterprise and risk spreading in the Feds setting up and backing a de facto monopoly of secondary mortgage holdings?
If someone buys a 6000 sq ft house making 40K a year, then shame on them. But, I have a problem with the effect this will have on thousands of children out there-not their fault their parents made poor decisions, or simply an honest mistake.
At least the government can shield homeowners from bad credit so they can move into smaller, more affordable homes. Besides, if they take a hit due to bad credit, they face the same foreclosure prospects down the line. However, such a thing should be provided to ALL homeowners, maybe a one-time thing.
Also, don’t forget the far-reaching economic implications. If we punish these homeowners, we end up just shooting ourselves in the foot.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 9, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Barack Obama had the idea first and floated it around to see if it could work. He figured out that it couldn’t. It would not cost 300 million. It would be more than a trillion dollars. John McCain is an idiot who clings to anything and tries to take credit for it. There is no way to isolate who you would actually help. If you happen to be a renter, why should your tax dollars go help irresponsible people who bought a house when they could not afford it. Housing prices have more than doubled since 2000 and now that they go down 25%, everybody is freaking out. Why not let the houses devaluate to the point where people can afford them ? If you can’t afford a house, I am sure that you can find a rental.
Posted by: Ron | October 9, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
people in swing states ACORN under investigation for massive voter registration fraud. so yes be careful.
the fbi raided las vegas acorn offices last night and more to come.
Posted by: landsend | October 9, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Seems like a smart plan by McCain. Obama’s been all talk. McCain’s ideas and policies have depth. Obama strings together sentences that all somehow seem to mention “change”, “middle class” and “President Bush.” Deeper ideas from Obama would be appreciated.
Posted by: Jeff | October 9, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Sure, but even renters do credit checks. I hear ya, but, again, unless this mortgage mess is cleaned up, like it or not, these capitalists are going to continue to freeze up the markets and spending. That doesn’t help any of us.
It’s simply a certain kind of sandwich that’s been served up to us and it sure don’t taste good.
We pay for all kinds of irresponsibility through our taxes. Why these big shots in Washington (including the leading candidates) aren’t calling for Freddie and Fannie to be dissolved is disheartening to say the least. They are a disaster, aren’t needed, and similar things are going to happen down the line because of them.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 9, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Obama is an opportunist…because
he run for president before the end of his first term……..
It’s scary……..
Obama manipulated the caucuses,DNC and party leaders and got the nomination..
It’s scary………….
Obama had bad connections with anti-
americans and convicted felon Tony
Rezko……….
It’s scary……….
His economic plan is higher taxes and
big government…….
It’s scary……….
His VP Biden said:He’s un-fit for
commander in chief…….
It’s scary………
I can go on and on………
Best choice is:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | October 9, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
McCain’s plan does not call for any more money to be spent, he wants to use the bailout package dollars. His plan applies to only homeownres living in the houses, not to “flippers” or speculators, and the people have to prove they can afford the payments or no deal. What’s wrong with that plan? Empty houses affect neighborhoods, communities, cities, all of us. This is a way to help people stay in their homes and get the bad paper out of the pipeline.
Posted by: Grammy Barb | October 9, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
McCain wants to pay full price for the loan, thus giving money to the lenders at the tax payers expense.
I knew there had to be a catch when he made the announcement.
By the way I am not one of his fellow prisoners.
Posted by: Thinking | October 9, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
The plan is about buying these troubled loans, the ones that are about to go into default and force the banks to renegotiate. And it comes out of the 700 billion that we just spent last week instead of having it go for wooden arrows and Jamaican Rum. If you haven’t heard already this bailout was just the first wave, there are millions of loans out there that are on the brink of foreclosure.
Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | October 9, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Just a quick fact check from one of the comments – Raines, Johnson and Howard are not and never were advisers for the Obama Campaign. Raines is a supporter and talked to the campaign a couple of times, Johnson was on the VP vetting committee and then had to resign after it came out he received $2 mil in overpriced loans from Countrywide (Johnson is not with Fannie Mae, but Countrywide is a financial partner), and Howard has no known connection w/ the campaign. I’m guessing the person who wrote that message got an email that has been going around and has been verified as false.
It is really risky for McCain supporters to imply that these people are Obama’s advisers because it begs scrutiny on people on McCain’s team, the most obvious and egregious being Rick Davis.
Posted by: CKB | October 9, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Whoever wins, and it is likely at the moment to be Obama, is going to have a mess on there hands as the American people are divided. This election has pretty much guaranteed that.
McCain came home from Vietnam as a guy with a broken body from war and the American public turned their backs and spat, literally, on our war heroes. The media had done a spectacular job of portraying people who risked their lives as baby killers.
The flap about Obama hanging out with Ayers is that same story from the other side. Ayers was blowing up America because he did not like our military policies. He was most likely one of the people disparaging war heroes. And he was very successful at it.
Now it appears that Ayers continues to be successful. I am sure there is a lesson in this about the American people. Reminds me a bit of the Seven Samarai movie.
Posted by: gulf today | October 9, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
One should mention, that our poor exit from Vietnam was led by the liberals and the liberal media. As a result of the untimely exit, some say, million people died in Cambodia and south east Asia.
Posted by: gulf today | October 9, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
McCain plan is a joke, a last try to change the game. There is no flip-flop here: The idea was good, but when you look at the details, the plan is bad.
McCain is desperate, so is Sarah “Barack” kuda Pal-liar.
Posted by: Fred | October 9, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am
OH SHUT UP with the same LETANY about THE LIBERAL MEDIA AND THE LIBERAL THIS AND THAT
Own up to something for God’s Sake!
McCain is doing POOORLY on the polls! you got such A BIG PROBLEM WITH THE MEDIA?? GO MOVE TO CUBA! they got them real calmed over there.
Posted by: GIGI | October 9, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
Obama’s camp is so stupid. That mortgage buy plan was Hillary’s plan. Yet Obama the man that says vote for me, you can’t tell the difference between my politics and Hillary’s didn’t even recognize it. I can see the ad for this one coming, and right in front of Obama’s face. McCain looking out for Mainstreet with Bi-Partisan effort, Obama looking out for Wallstreet. Just google Hillary HOLC plan and look at all the articles now coming out. McCain embraces Hillary’s plan, why not Obama? Once again McCain reaches out in Bi-Partisan effort using part of Hillary’s plan. etc…etc. McCain even credited Hillary with the plan.
Posted by: Diana | October 9, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am
The darkest hour of MCBush failed policy is just before the dawn. No matter how bleak the circumstances,
how incredible the odds of Obama is being elected, hope always remains. When it looks like you have been abandoned and forsaken in this bad economy time, there will be a light shining through.
Cling to it, lift yourself up,and overcome. You know that MCcain/Palin dirty politics and turmoil market
are only temporary things in this world. The power of evil MCCain will retreat from the burning rays of truth and righteousness. America will never surrender to enemy and rise to prosperity by Obama leadership and his right judgment and bipartisanship policy.
Posted by: No MCcain | October 9, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am
No matter how the media spins this one, for the first time they see Mc Cain on the right side of americans economically.
Obama is making a rare mistake. He needs to rush out his own plan quickly or this is all that Mc Cain will take about for the next month .
Obama supported the wall st bailout but not the bailout for homeowners.
The american public wont like that.
Posted by: infoseeking | October 9, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am
the american public is too busy thinking about Obama’s middle name. I don’t think they’ll notice.
Posted by: GIGI | October 9, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am
FACT CHECK: The Federal Election Commission reported that McCain received $169,000.00 from his CEO and Exec friends and the lobbyists of Fannie Mae and Freddie.
Yet McCain claims that Obama got the second highest contribution from those companies. According to FACT CHECK the Federal Election Commission stated that McCain LIED.
Obama did NOT get contributions from the Fannie and Freddie companies at all. Obama’s contributions were from the working middle class employees from those companies which amounted to ONLY $16,000.00.
Wow McCain got $153,000.00 more from the top Exec’s and CEO’s and Lobbyists, than what Obama got from the employees, and yet McCain keeps spewing his lies about Obama.
Posted by: mere | October 9, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am
“saying it would cause the government to lose money by paying too much for bad loans.”
Obama said that?
He was all for the stimulus, he was for the two bail outs.
Obama always says he for the people, I guess he just proved himself.
Posted by: seh | October 9, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am
McCain’s plan is bad.
Posted by: David | October 9, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am
Good for Obama. McCain’s plan is just a waste of money.
Posted by: David | October 9, 2008, 5:44 am 5:44 am
But here’s the part Mr. Obama leaves out. Mr. McCain also proposes a $5,000 credit to offset any new tax liability. In the case of the family referenced above, they get a health-care plan, enough money to pay the additional $3,000 in taxes, plus an extra $2,000 in their pockets – not a bad deal for the middle class. So the Obama ads are both incomplete and misleading. So in addition to putting more money in middle-class families’ pockets, Mr. McCain’s idea helps improve transparency in the health-care system. The extra income shows who is really paying for health care. This, in turn, will expedite other needed changes in the system. By willfully ignoring the second half of Mr. McCain’s health-care plan, Mr. Obama opposes an idea that provides significant middle-class tax relief, and misses a chance to provide the kind of transparency needed to speed reform. For a candidate who bases his campaign on “change,” Mr. Obama’s distortions of the McCain health-care plan sound eerily familiar.
Posted by: OurCountryFirst | October 9, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am
Remember these words, “The fundamentals of our (I assume the USA) are good” Words spoken by Senator McCain. Just a few weeks ago. Now he’s pushing one plan after another. Senator McCain, himself, has no plan. No plan at all, for all that is going on. I hate to say this, but from his body language, he’s suffering from early stages of plain old dementia. His words are put into his mouth, by his self serving evil staff. I respect Senator McCain, he’s served his country proudly. But what I see of him now, is not the Senator McCain that was. He’s the new Republican Puppet, just like the present President. Let’s face it, we’re fundementaly screwed.
Posted by: Arie Bakker | October 9, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
HE WAS FOR IT BEFORE HE WAS AGAINST IT! SOUNDS LIKE SOMEBODY WE KNEW BACK IN 2004? GIVE ME A BREAK, THIS GUY SAYS HE IS FOR MIDDLE CLASS AND NOW HE WONT SUPPORT TAKING 300 OF THE 700 TO BUY BACK BAD LOANS? WHILE I DONT AGREE WITH THE WHOLE BAIL OUT, I DO AGREE THAT WE HAVE TO HELP AND STOP THE HOUSING PRICE SKIDS! THIS AFFECTS EVERYBODY WHO OWNS A HOME BECAUSE IF YOUR NEIGHBOR GOES BELLY UP GUESS WHAT THAT DOES TO YOUR HOMES VALUE? OBAMA IS NOT FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS HE IS FOR HIMSELF! HE WILL DO AND SAY WHAT HE THINKS IS BEST AT THE TIME. I WAS FOR IT BEFORE I WAS AGAINST!
I THINK WE NEED TO SHOW OBAMA COME ELECTION DAY “WE WERE FOR YOU BEFORE WE WERE AGAINST YOU” AND SEND HIM BACK TO CHICAGO
Posted by: chuck | October 9, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
I like Obamas new found financial “Conservatism”. While we’re at it we could also save money by de-funding corrupt groups like ACORN, and racist groups like Planned Parenthood.
Posted by: Jack | October 9, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am
Taxpayers should not bail out home owners who bought more home than they could afford, who didn’t live within their means, who got deep in debt with their CC. Many did the right things and now the greedy are to be bailed out? No, says I. Let them go back to their lender and refinance a lower payment at the same interest rate and balance. It was after all the lender and the buyer
that made the error. The realtors, appraisers were also part of the error equation. If anything the Feds should require lenders, to renegotiate loans to lower monthly payments. Bailing out the average citizen for their bad decisions and choices is like distributing the nation’s wealth among its citizens. Something not right about McCain’s plan, just not right.
Posted by: Lawrence | October 9, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
He is rejecting it because he does not have a plan of his own.. Mr. big talker and big spender. He was one upped by McCain and he doesn’t like it. Poor baby. If Obama is the true leader that he portrays himself, WHERE IS HIS SOLUTION??? Has none.. that’s what I thought. All lies no substance. He is just a smooth talker and the fools of America fall for the snakes.
Posted by: ml | October 9, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am
Better to bailout American homeowners than junket-going bank executives who shop at Cartier!
Posted by: tina | October 9, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am
As of today, Alaska has the highest gas prices in the nation at still over 4 bucks a gallon. This from a State with Oil??? Is this what Palin will bring to the nation with McCain, higher prices? McCain’s mortgage solution is a web of lies. There is no way this country can sustain another bailout of trillions of dollars to buy out everyone’s mortgage. There simply is no money of that magnitude left, not with the expenses of this damn war which McCain will continue. Obama has a plan that will really help homeowners with details of his plan which will not bankrupt the country like McCain’s plan. McCain should simply stop lying to the people, he knows we simply do not have the money he talks about, but doesn’t specify.
Posted by: Jake | October 9, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Both of these candidates’ plans at some level require big bucks. Who’s responsible for the mortgage crisis? The people controlling the market gambled to the point of no return. They received their compensation, and it’s the buyers who are being sacrificed. Obama and McCain should in their rhetoric address this. Many buyers bought beyond their means. Subprime loans were abused by the movers and shakers from the national level down to local. They all should be accountable. An O. plan or a Mc. plan will cost us, the taxpayers. It’s sort of like “the kettle calling the pot black”
Posted by: Vivi | October 9, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
“I have a temper, to state the obvious, which I have tried to control with varying degrees of success because it does not always serve my interest or the public’s.” – John McCain
During last night’s debate, John McCain said we need “a cool hand at the tiller,” but McCain has proven to be a loose cannon. He has accosted his Congressional colleagues on both sides of the aisle on everything from the federal budget to diplomatic relations. He is known for hurling profanities rather than settling disagreements calmly. His belligerence is legendary. Even conservative Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi has said, “He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.”
When someone earns the nickname “Senator Hothead,” the public ought to call his character into question. McCain’s propensity to explode undermines his abilities as a rational decision maker, particularly on national security issues — which could prove disastrous considering our country is already involved in two wars.
With the election less than four weeks away, here’s a chance for you to take concrete action:
McCain’s temper is critical to his decision-making abilities, and his character must be discussed. As Drew Westen writes, “The political brain is an emotional brain. It is not a dispassionate calculating machine, objectively searching for the right facts, figures and policies to make a reasoned decision.” That why it’s so crucial people know the real Senator Hothead.
Posted by: banks | October 9, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Guys he said it seemed like like a good idea, investigated it further and realized it would be worse on us middle class people. I find it reassuring that Obama is careful and thoughtful when making decisions and not doing the Bush/McCain knee jerk reaction.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 9, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Barack Obama and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Friends. They’ve worked together for years. But Obama tries to hide it. Why?
Obama launched his political career in Ayers’ living room. Ayers and Obama ran a radical “education” foundation, together. They wrote the foundation’s by-laws, together. Obama was the foundation’s first chairman. Reports say they, “distributed more than $100 million to ideological allies with no discernible improvement in education.”
When their relationship became an issue, Obama just responded, “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” That’s it?
We know Bill Ayers ran the “violent left wing activist group” called Weather Underground. We know Ayers’ wife was on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted list. We know they bombed the Capitol. The Pentagon. A judge’s home. We know Ayers said, “I don’t regret setting bombs. …. I feel we didn’t do enough.”
But Obama’s friendship with terrorist Ayers isn’t the issue. The issue is Barack Obama’s judgment and candor. When Obama just says, “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” Americans say, “Where’s the truth, Barack?”
Barack Obama. Too risky for America.
Posted by: Unrepentant Weathermen for Change | October 9, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
I worked with subprime morgages for a brief time.Most were for manufactured housing. I can tell you that most of the fraud started at the bottom. Salesman promising anything.Fake financial documents. fake employee records,altered bank statements. The tools were in place to to catch alot of this stuff but not used. People with bad FICA scores, past unpaid judgements on their records.The money rolled in for everyone.We all know who’s goin gto pay now.
Posted by: linda n carolina | October 9, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Does ACORN have an office in Indianapolis? You know they do.
According to STATSIndiana, In 2007, Indianapolis/Marion County had an estimated population of 876,804. Of that number 232,607 were below 18 years of age, for a total of 644,197 people in Marion County/Indianapolis 18 or over and thus eligible to vote. (Indiana allows felons to vote as long as they are not incarcerated).
So we have 644,197 people eligible to be registered in Marion County/Indianapolis, and 677,401 people registered. Congratulations go to Indianapolis for having 105% of its residents registered!
Across the nation voter registration irregularities are coming to light. Many of these irregularities involving the former employer, ACORN, of one of our Presidential candidates, Barack Obama. Now it comes to light that Obama’s campaign has paid ACORN over $800,000 for “get out the vote” efforts so far this campaign season.
At some point, someone is going to have to look into this stuff.
Posted by: An ACORN doesn't fall far from the tree | October 9, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Let every vote count, is the Democratic Party’s mantra these days. That slogan might better be: Let every vote count as often as we need to win.
Such, at any rate, are the tactics of ACORN, Barack Obama’s favorite “community organizers,” and its Project Vote – of which, the Democratic presidential candidate has boasted, “I started working as the director . . . here in Chicago.”
ACORN has been implicated in voter-fraud schemes in 15 states – including Ohio, from where The Post’s Jeane MacIntosh reports today that a Board of Elections investigation has unearthed evidence of widespread voter fraud.
Two voters told MacIntosh they had been dragooned by ACORN activists into registering several times – one reporting having signed up “10 to 15″ times.
ACORN canvassers “would ask me if I was registered,” he said. “I’d say yes and they’d ask me to do it again.”
Tuesday, Nevada officials raided ACORN’s Las Vegas offices as part of a probe into voter-registration fraud – noting that some forms submitted by ACORN workers included the names of Dallas Cowboys players.
Officials in Lake County, Ind. report that fully 1,100 of 2,000 new voter-registration forms delivered by ACORN were “suspicious.”
In Washington state, officials recently closed an investigation into ballot cheating that resulted in prison terms.
ACORN submitted more than 800 phony registration forms in Independence, Mo., with one woman registering 10 times, using three birthdates, four different Social Security numbers and six different phone numbers.
And, as The Post reported Monday, another pro-Obama group, Vote Today Ohio, took advantage of a quirk in that state’s law, which allows people to register and vote on the same day without having to prove residency, to drive hundreds of people from homeless shelters and drug-rehab centers to the polls.
John McCain’s campaign says all this “doesn’t pass the smell test.”
Actually, it stinks.
And it’s being done by a group with which Barack Obama has proudly been associated.
What, then, would they be able to pull off with a friend in the White House?
Posted by: ACORN | October 9, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
to all of you botts yelling about mccains mortage plan i have this to say.1]its not additional it comes from the money already voted on.2]the only way to stop this slide is to stop the slide in home value.3]you stop the slide in home value by keeping more people in their homes which this proposal does.4]let me give you all a example ,here in phoenix the average price for a 2000 sq ft home before this started was 250 to 300 thousand ,now those same homes are selling for 170 to 200 thousand so lets say you put 5% down on 300 thousand,thats 15 thousand ,thats not chump change,you took a ajustible rate thinking interest rates might further go down in a year or two and having a lower payment to start would help you afford the window blinds and landscaping which the hoa requires.now the market has dropped you cant sell your home for what you owe and the payment has ballooned to where you are having trouble making it and if you or your spouse gets laid off your done.so what maccains proposal does is revalue the home down to market value now and put you in a fixed 30 yr mortage the end result of this is the money goes to me and you and not wall st shure they get a little but the majority goes to us.and with less houses in foreclosure the prices stabilize.btw this plan is basically hillarys plan which was a modern version of fdrs.
Posted by: don tufts | October 9, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Okay people – let’s try this – walk around and knock on doors and say “Hi, Would you like to Pay MY MORTGAGE for me?” and see how many people say yes.
The taxpayers will be the ones footing the bill, so you and I will be giving our money to pay off loans for people who never should have been given them in the first place. The value of MY HOME has decreased and I would love to have a new mortgage at 5% fixed rate based on just 90% of the current value of my home. Maybe I should stop making my payments since I did get a subprime loan – I had no choice due to past medical debt bringing down my credit score, but I got a fixed rate and my credit score is back in the 700′s.
I bought a home I knew I could afford, despite the facts that my lender gave me a pre-approval for $70,000 more and my realtor pushing me to look at houses at that value. I’ve paid every single payment on time. So what is my reward? – apparently to pay off other peoples debt due to their carelessness and stupidity and gullibility to be convinced that they could afford a loan they should have know full well they could not.
Will you pay my mortgage for me please?
Posted by: LAURIE | October 9, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
An Acorn…. I live in Indianapolis and I am in Marion county. I also helped register new voters. Never has anyone told me to register voters more than once, what I was told as a volunteer for Obama was to register anyone that was not registered, no matter who they were voting for, I think you people like to connect Obama to anything illegal, no matter who is to blame you make it out to be Obama. I would like to know where you got your info from so that I can read up on it, because what I heard on the Indy news was that thousands of new voter registion was lost and they need to call to make sure they are still registered to vote. So, therefore I find it unbelievable that your story is true.
Posted by: Emilianna | October 9, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
As outside economic advisors to the Obama-Biden campaign, we were also aware that his type of effort to restructure mortgages to help keep families in their homes had been something Senator Obama had been calling for since March. Thus our initial conclusion was that this proposal was a rather non-consequential ploy by McCain to provide cover for the fact that he has tended to be either late, on the wrong side, or frenetic and all over the map on policy responses to our current financial crisis.
Posted by: kawasaki | October 9, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
I think people in our country is out of touch. Both our candidates are politicians, so both have faults. But situation right now is very dire. All I want to hear is a plan. So far, Obama has laid out his plans and talked about it. McCain on the other hand has come out with contradicting statements during debates. Listen carefully to what they are saying without preconceive notion. The point about cutting government spending and giving more tax breaks, I ask, where are we going to get any money? Without economic power, there is no military power, this is a historical fact. Yes, we have lost soldiers in Iraq, but what about the loss of innocent lives? Should other countries “invade” us in the name of “good” because we have radicals in our country as well? This is another fact, we are $10trillion in debt that works out to +80K for each American and if your baby is born today, he/she is already in debt.
Posted by: Jim | October 9, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
We have dug ourselves into this hole. As much as everyone wants to blame wallstreet, where do you think they get the loans to package and sell? Yes, consumers like you and me. We were ALL greedy in buying a house with no money down, and living beyond our means. There is no question wall street added to the subprime crisis, but where were our heads when banks pre approved a loan for a house many many times our per annum salary. So, if someone cannot afford to live in their mansion, why should everyone else bail him out?
Posted by: Jim | October 9, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
to thease last posters i guess you did not read my post.btw 2000sq ft is not a mansion its a 4 bed home for a family of 5.grow up
Posted by: don tufts | October 9, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
What is this?!!! Jay Mac wants to interfere with the GODS!!! ……mmmmmm….I thought u believe in minimal governmental ‘interference’ with domestic finantial issues Jay Mac…u’ve been preaching that we should let the free-market fairy god-mother fix everything…what changed? mmmmm….is it that you’re desperate now!!!….is it that you’re behind in the polls….mmmm!!!?!!
Posted by: Huh? | October 9, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Im not in favor with either one – of course we are in a catch 22 — one has zero experience and the other is not sure what way to turn — either way I see a divided america — how sad these two guys are the best we americans can come up !!!
Posted by: ron | October 9, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Look, the real issue is nobody knows what the heck McCain is really saying in the proposal. Is it an additional 300 billion dollars? Is it included in the original $700 billion? Does it let all homeowners off the hook (raising the ire of responsibile borrowers)? The package looks like it was slapped together as a crude attempt to pander to voters. Not well thought out. Same as his gas tax holiday proposal.
Posted by: indy_voter | October 9, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama has bad judgement!
His church, the Sunday after the attacks of 9/11 were laughing, clapping and jumping in joy while Obama’s spiritual adviser and mentor, Rev Wright, was twisting at the pulpit screaming in delight, “the chickens are coming home to roost.
Hillary has the experience and was pushed aside by Nancy Pelosi and her superdelegate puppets.
I received my absentee ballot in California and voted for McCain and will vote for Hillary in 2012.
Obama and his radical associations are too extreme and disgusting.
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Californian For McCain | October 9, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
My point was not to pinpoint semantics here. The point is that people are living beyond their means. Phoenix, Arizona has one of the most inflated home prices in the country. Here’s a curious question, if your employer promised to pay you over what your worth is, will you tell them no and take a 30% pay cut instead? With McCain’s plan, somebody has to absorb that costs, that is if we still believe in capitalism. Unless, we enforce the government’s authority, which is a socialistic approach. While the individual is important, this is a bigger problem than that.
Posted by: Jim | October 9, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
So, the article indicates Obama was FOR and is now AGAINST it……
Like Ayers, ACORN, Gay Marriage, Rev Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Father Pflegler!
OBAMA IS TOO RADICAL! TOO EXTREME! TOO INEXPERIENCED!
Posted by: Jamie | October 9, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Complete recovery of economy is not in near future. However, sheltering is the most urgent and immediate need of Americans. But McCain needs to action on where to find the money. From the bailout grant? How much will be left at the beginning of next year.
Posted by: Ashley | October 9, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
MCLiar is on TV lying again about Obama receive many for Freddie and Fannie. NOw he is say Obama got donation from the CEO, which in fact all Obama donation came from the employees of these two companies. McLiar got most of his donations from the CEO becasue all the employees hate Mcliar and thats way the employees have donated more to Obama and not McLiar!
Posted by: gl | October 9, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I would like to know why the media has been silent on Palin’s ongoing association with the Alaskan Independence Party – a group that hates the US so much that their goal is to secede. This is beyond a double standard. Here’s the link showing video of her ties.
http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/the-palins-imperfect-union/
Posted by: kim | October 9, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
The reason the mortgage crisis is here is because the Democrates faught so hard to give loans to people who did not deserve them. They couldnt afford to make the payments now we are in a mess. Personally, I am glad to see it happen. Our country overstretches at every angle to make those who can not afford things given to them. The Dems were in the pockets of Freddie and Fannie so this is the way it ends up. Well good, those who can not afford something should not stretch beyone there means to get it. It only makes the rest of us pay. Nice Job Pelosi
Posted by: monkeysee | October 9, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
By the way half brother wants to spend 50 billion dollars or our money on foreign aid. Great more money to help those who dont help themselves. Kind of like welfare for the world on our tax dollars.
Posted by: monkeysee | October 9, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
NOBRO and the Terriorist
Posted by: NOBRO | October 9, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
boycott all McCain that is Cindy McCain’s family business products. Maybe this will give her even a colder chill down her back. At least temporarily BOYCOTT BUSCH BEER AND DRINK their competitors products which are: Molson, Miller, Heineken and Coors.
Posted by: kawasaki | October 9, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I guess all you Dem’s & news Media have forgotten that Obama was the first one to suggest about the gov’t negociating a mortgage price that the homeowner could afford. The gov’t would eat the difference between the actual price and the new negociated price. This was OBAMA idea first, not McCains. Hey ask Obama how is Toney Rezko (born in Aleppo SYRIA), Rober Malley (he talks to HAMAS), Nadhmi Auchi, William Moorehead, Raila Odingom, Alcorn, Valerie Jarrett, oh she is your chief advisor even though she used to work for a company that managed the Projects in Chicago. that company let the tenants go through a winter with out heat…nice….How is Grove Parc, it was built by Rezko one of your first supportors for office and loan you money to buy a house next to his, Woodlawn, How is Allison Davis. Did your mentor Frank Davis leave you his Russian flag? How did you have the money to go around the world? How oh I mean WHERE did you get the money to go travel around the world. Lets see you went to Indonesia to visit your mother, then off to Hyderabad India, 3 weeks in Pakistan visiting your roommates Wahid Hamid & Muhammad Chandoo, then off to Africa to visit your fathers family. Where DID you get the money to pay for this trip??? Where did you get the money to go to Columbia? I am sorry but your grandparents couldn’t have afforded tuition to a private high school and then Columbia, I don’t care how many jobs they worked there is no way they could have saved $150,000 to pay for the tuition at Columbia. Sounds like Obama has his hand in the cookie jar of someones big bank account….I forgot your former roomates are helping you to raise money for the Presidental race…using the internet and where are all these funds coming from???? Countries that are listed as AXIS of EVIL that produce known terrorist???? Makes you wonder….doesn’t it….Wake up people and start demanding the MEDIA to investigate and ask OBAMA real questions.
Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 9, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Sounds pretty socialist to me (Even for a Canadian)… Imagine a Rep speaking about such idealology. Especially after all the cat calling going on regarding Obama’s health agenda. Hmmm think is called “Flip Flopping” and desperate vote culling…
Posted by: Paul_in_Vanc | October 9, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
What would Ron Paul do? That is what I want to know.
Posted by: Jim | Oct 8, 2008 8:36:47 PM
*****************************************
You can find quotes all on the web quoting Dr. Paul. He has always opposed the bailout saying that it will do nothing to address the core issues (not to mention it’s unconstitutional).
I am sure he would say the same about buying up mortgages from individuals as well for the same reasons.
We can all sympathize with those experiencing mortgage difficulties, but that does not mean we all support government intervention.
Dr. Paul surely understands economics and markets better than these 2 clowns put together.
Posted by: Fed Up With Them All (except Ron Paul) | October 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Concerned American: another way to raise revenue and pay for everything is to revive the economy and collect more taxes without raising taxes.
Posted by: Kottaras | Oct 8, 2008 9:06:15 PM
*****************************************
How about by massively cutting spending? A smaller more limited government would serve everyone’s interests.
How about a return to the VIRTUES of thrift, self-reliance and responsibility? We won’t get it from our so-called leaders, so let’s start with ourselves.
Of course if you’d rather have the government take care of you from cradle to grave and regulate all aspects of your life, then by all means vote for either of these 2 morons.
Posted by: Frustrated | October 9, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
We shouldn’t be surprised at another
Obama flip-flop!
He has even flipped on universal
healthcare.
When answering any question regarding
the economy, energy, the Iraq war etc,
the Obama campaign needs to preface
their comments with “Obama Now”!
Obama is even more of a flip-flopper
than John Kerry!
Posted by: reaganfan | October 9, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Obama is going to claim this plan as his own very soon, because it makes sense to get money right to the source itself. Once the details are structured right, $300 billion out of the $700 billion already allocated, can go directly to recover the foreclosed homes – the source itself. Otherwise, Obama is now caught fighting for the very same trickle down economics – he claims he is fighting against. I say, get the money directly to the homeowner and lender at ground zero – or it will never get there.
Posted by: philphat | October 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Bail out for the banks last thing I want. But McCains idea is at least an idea. Whats Obamas. We could look at it this way give the people a fixed rate 30 year mortgage and sit back and collect the interest. Don’t you all remember how shocked you were when you saw what that house actually will cost you after 30 years of interest? I know I was. And we are all forgetting we could be collecting this interest. Again I ask WHAT IS OBAMAS IDEA?
Posted by: conf1689 | October 10, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Concerned American what channel are you watching people stay put in their homes values will go up. Well newsflash if thigs keep going this way there will be so many foreclosures no one will no what to do. Why not try to prevent any more bleeding if we can. As I say I don’t want to bail them out either, but the predatory lending that went on in the past three years needs to be corrected and this country including the consumer has to make sure it never happens again.30 YEARS OF INTEREST COLLECTED ON THOSE REFINANCED HOMES. BUT THEY MUST BE QUALIFIED ,JOB VERIFICATION,INCOME VERIFICATION, GOOD CREDIT AND HAVE PUT A DOWN PAYMENT DOWN AND HAVE TO LIVE IN THE HOME. tHEN WE CAN ALL SEE OUR HOME VALUES GO BACK UP EVENTUALLY ONE THE SUPPLY IS GONE AND DEMAND COMES BACK.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 10, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
bILLY7 As a Realtor I can tell you first hand the banks are not cooperating or acting quickly enough. They are taking months to accept offers on short sales holding up legitimate buyers. And are slow to put these properties on the market and in the mean time these homes are sitting empty longer and being vandalized, pipes bursting, copper piping and boilers being stolen, rodent infestation and yes decreasing in value more and more everyday and devaluing everybodys home and neighborhood. I hate to say it but I guess someone has to step in because the banks are manipulating and holding us hostage. Have to admit I don’t know why or what there plan is. But we can’t afford to find out.I say do what we have to and then bring them all into court and prosecute.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 10, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Kawasaki back in March or at one point not sure when the Congress did insruct banks to start renegotiating laons with homeowners and got an extension for home foreclosures. Barney Franks idea. Well guess what it probably wasn’t a bad idea, but everybody forgot to follow up and make sure the lenders were doing this. Guess what they weren’t. And what little might have been done they didn’t do it fast enough. A better idea Barney Frank may have had was to listen to John McCain in 2005 when he warned about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But then again if he had and the economy hadn’t collapsed 40 days before the election then Obama and the democrats wouldn’t have had a chance. Lets remember who holds the purse strings and who has had control of Congress for two years.The Democrats.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 10, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
9michael99 capital gains tax is a 15%tax on the profit from what you paid for the stock when you bought it.You pay this tax when and if you sell the stock. No matter what your income is. And alot of middle class people own stocks. May-be not after this week. But the 15% tax is plenty and Obama doesn’t need to raise it. This isn’t just a tax on the rich has he likes to say. I am not rich and yet I own stock.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 10, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Thank you very much for your post. Absolutely excellent information and very useful for me. Great done and keep posted. Looking forward to reading more from you.
Posted by: Edwin | November 22, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am