By Julia Hoppock

Oct 18, 2008 3:43pm

Obama: My Tax Credits are Not ‘Welfare’

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Standing beneath the Gateway Arch in downtown St Louis, Senator Obama responded to claims from the McCain campaign that his tax plan is a "welfare" program because it gives tax credits for people who don’t pay federal income taxes.

"I’m not giving tax cuts to folks who don’t work, I’m giving tax cuts to people who do work. John McCain is so out of touch with the struggles you are facing that he must be the first politician in history to call a tax cut for working people ‘welfare.’"

It is true that the Obama refundable tax credits plan does benefit people who are not paying federal income taxes. But, Obama’s tax credits go to people who pay payroll taxes, even if they are too low-income to pay federal income taxes. The Obama campaign says most working people pay more in payroll taxes than income tax.

"The only ‘welfare’ in this campaign is John McCain’s plan to give another $200 billion in tax cuts to the wealthiest corporations in America – including $4 billion in tax breaks to big oil companies that ran up record profits under George Bush," Obama continued, "That’s who John McCain is fighting for."

While not mentioning the now infamous "Joe the Plumber" by name – Senator Obama told the crowd that his tax plan would give everyday Americans – and plumbers – access to a tax cut.

"It’s time to give a tax cut to the teachers and the janitors who work in our schools; to the cops and firefighters who keep us safe; to the waitresses working double shifts, the nurses in the ER, and yes the plumbers fighting for their American Dream. These workers are the backbone of our country. They’re the ones that Washington has forgotten."

As ABC’s Teddy Davis reported this week, in attacking Obama’s refundable tax credits, the McCain campaign is overlooking that the centerpiece of the McCain health care plan is a refundable tax credit which would provide $2,500 to every American or $5,000 to every American family for health insurance regardless of whether the adults receiving the benefit work.

Drawing a record breaking rally crowd of 100,000 Senator Obama has high hopes of flipping the state of Missouri, where polls currently show him slightly ahead of Sen. McCain.

"I think the winds of change are blowing all across America. They’re blowing here in Missouri, they’re blowing in Michigan, they’re blowing in Illinois, they’re blowing in VA, and they are blowing in Ohio," Obama said listing many red states where his campaign has their eye on to turn blue.

But the Illinois Senator told the crowd not to get too over-confident.

"Democrats have a way of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory," he said remembering his loss in the New Hampshire primary, "This election’s too important to take anything for granted."

User Comments

For those not familiar with hussein’s loony-left welfare plan and his related radical wealth re-distribution plan, here is a summary that even a hussein sycophant might understand (provide somebody reads it to them very, very S-L-O-W-L-Y):
1. hussein will raise taxes (somebody has to pay for this welfare). As plagiarist-joe biden said: RAISING TAXES IS PATRIOTIC.
2. Since most of hussein’s supporters don’t contribute to society, don’t earn meaningful income and therefore don’t pay taxes, hussein plans to re-distribute wealth by giving the tax money paid by hard-working, successful Americans to his supporters via a tax credit. For example, consider those college pukes that support him and primarily live off their parents for drug money (and probably will do for the rest of their lives). Say they earn a few dollars flipping-burgers, and pay no income taxes. Under hussein’s plan, even these pukes WILL GET A CHECK OF $1000 OR MORE FROM THE IRS.
3. Thus hussein will, in fact, create the biggest welfare system ever in the world. He will penalize those that work hard and are successful, and reward those that don’t contribute with cash payments.
For every hard-working American: be afraid, be very afraid of hussein’s plans to socialize America. Reject this shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, drug-addicted, elitist, narcissistic, flip-flopping gas-bag who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes. Instead, vote for somebody who will reform the Washington mess – instead of making it an even more horrific monster.

Posted by: ALEX H. | October 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

What twisted logic – if somone has zero income tax liability and they get a check from the treasury department, how can you call that a “tax cut”? That is an outright lie. In Obama’s world green is purple and orange is brown – he thinks you can spin your way out of any fact. Ayers “just a guy in the neighborhood”, Acorn given $800K for “mood lighting”, and Wright a “spiritual advisor” for 20 years and now suddenly, old news. Obama is a pathological liar.

Posted by: Ryan G. | October 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Sen. McCain is going to let working people pay less in taxes. That is a tax-cut.
Sen. Obama is going to write checks to people who don’t pay taxes. That is welfare.
Senator Obama’s plan is not tax-and-spend liberalism, it is income redistribution socialism.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

BO “Spread the Wealth Around” just what the Democrats love…. More Class warfare…. the FACT is small business will be TAXED @ a higher rate under BO….. he and the media are just plan LIEING……… PLUS when you raise taxes on Businesses… GUESS WHAT … they raise their prices….. so who actually pays “THE CONSUMER….. YOU PAY”….. so this is just a HIDDEN tax on the consumer…

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 18, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Republicans are always against welfare on the little guy but gives millions away to corporate welfare. Isn’t that right AIG, Lehman Brothers, etc.

Posted by: shawn | October 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“$4 billion in tax breaks to big oil companies” Obama continued, “That’s who John McCain is fighting for.”
that’s uncalled for. McCain supporters don’t insist that Sen. Obama is fighting for anyone except the middle class. Sen. Obama shouldn’t impugn Sen. McCain’s patriotism by claiming he is only fighting for oil companies. They should be able to agree that they disagree on how to go about it, but they should agree that America’s middle class is both of theirs shared priority.

Posted by: Clintonites for McCain | October 18, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

– Sen. McCain is going to let working people pay less in taxes. That is a tax-cut. –
Unless you make $100Kor more, you won’t see a tax cut under McCain.
Unless you make more than $250K, you won’t see a tax increase under Obama, and then only to levels less than they were under Clinton.
If we want to continue doing things like performing the largest government reorg since WWII, or unprovoked attacks against foreign countries that cost $10 billion a month, money has to be raised from somewhare.
Trickle down is a failed experiment. And yet, people continue to think that if we try it again, it might work this time. There is a name for people who think like that.. and it is not flattering.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

I love the smell of republican fear in the morning.

Posted by: DreadAmerican | October 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

When Obama told Joe the Plumber he believed it was best to spread the wealth around, it was one on one, from his heart, not a telepromted speach. It was real. Now he’s trying to back peddle. He also told a rally “how many plumbers do you know that make $250,000?” That was just rude! He is a phony & cannot be trusted! Also, Biden mentioned “redistribution of wealth” in his debate. It’s who these guys are & it’s what they believe!

Posted by: southern_conservative | October 18, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Looks like some right wing nutjobs have organized a commenting campaign on this website for every Obama-related piece. Go take your medicine.

Posted by: ASMcClane | October 18, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

McCain’s tax plans are no different than Bush’s…he basically says lets keep things the way they are. We’ll, the way it’s being done now is not working for anyone except the rich.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

JOHN MCCAIN is the candidate most concerned with people making over $250,000.
BARACK OBAMA is the candidate most concerned with the MIDDLE CLASS.

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Previous comments against Mr. Obama seemsmall potatos compared to 100,000 people … Americans look like they are going to chose common good as opposed to vitriol, anger and division.

Posted by: The Canadian Geezer | October 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

– Obama is fighting for anyone except the middle class –
I would love to hear how you rationalize that one!
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/
– Obama shouldn’t impugn Sen. McCain’s patriotism by claiming he is only fighting for oil companies –
I agree.. he is also fighting for the wealthy as evidenced by both his tax and health plans.
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126
And ‘patriotism’ has nothing to do with it.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

A tax cut for NON-wealthy people, outrageous, how dare the democrats suggest that the average American should get relief.
Don’t they know that this land is for the GOP rich?

Posted by: JR | October 18, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

John H. Is a dirty racist. His name is Barack Obama you scum bag.
And his tax policies help the working class much more than McCains. McCains tax policy is targeted towards the richest people in this country.

Posted by: Sam | October 18, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Please stop!… Did you get a $300.00 stimulus check from the Bush Administration… and what do you think the $700 billion dollar bail out is you moron!. Pots please stop calling Kettle Black!

Posted by: Nikki D | October 18, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

McCain = DISHONORABLE; Palin = SCARY!!!

Posted by: Howard Gallas | October 18, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

John H. Is a dirty racist. His name is Barack Obama you scum bag.
And his tax policies help the working class much more than McCains. McCains tax policy is targeted towards the richest people in this country.

Posted by: Sam | October 18, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Sen. McCain wants to let rich people pay less in taxes. That is a corporate welfare.

Posted by: JR | October 18, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Taxes is welfare? Does that mean that as it is right now, cooperate CEO’s and Oil companies are getting a welfare check from the government in the same sense? Now McCain wants to give them even more! Taking from the rich? How long has the rich been taking from us, both in tax cuts and price gauging at the pump? I think it’s time for the CEO’s and Oil companies to pay us back the money they took from us in the first place. McCain just hates this plan because it might take a few thousand off his 4 million dollar yearly income. He doesn’t care about America, he cares about himself and power, thats all.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Funny how the bloggers who are so upset with Obama increasing the taxes on people making more than $250,000 have trouble with their caps lock key, spelling and punctuation. I thought rich people had better education.

Posted by: doug | October 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This is not capitalism it is socialism for the wealthy and economic slavery for everyone else.

Posted by: B | October 18, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

If you don’t have a job it doesn’t matter how much the tax-cut is. And let’s face it corporations provide jobs … welfare to people who don’t or won’t work does not!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | October 18, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Since the end of Clinton’s term, I have seen wealth become more and more concentrated and the GOP borrow and spend like drunken sailors. My child will have to pay off the debt that you right wing jerks have run up on your stupid tax cuts and your g’damn wars.

Posted by: B | October 18, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

BOO

Posted by: Perry | October 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

It is so exciting to smell the fear of the right-wingnuts. I am from the metro St. Louis area and I can tell you here and now that Obama will win in Missouri – the crowds at the St. Louis Arch were reported as 100,000 but that is not close. The crowds were bigger than for any event I have been at – my estimate and those of people in the area are much higher. It just proves that we are sick and tired of being sick and tired and poor in this country because of the repukelicans and McLame and Pain and their supporters. Go crawl back into your caves. The party is over for you.

Posted by: durrs | October 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Alex H.
Does the initial “H” stand for Hussien?

Posted by: shalom | October 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim of Kenyan origins who studied in Islamic schools and whose campaign may have been financed by people in the Islamic and African worlds, Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi said during a recent televised national rally. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
“There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama,” said Gadhafi in little-noticed remarks he made at a rally marking the anniversary of the 1986 U.S. air raid on his country. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The remarks, translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute, MEMRI, were aired on Al Jazeera in June. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
“All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” continued Gadhafi. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………
“We are hoping that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity, and in his faith, and that [he will know] that he has rights in America, and that he will change America from evil to good, and that America will establish relations that will serve it well with other peoples, especially the Arabs,” Gadhafi said.

Posted by: Wisdom | October 18, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

A lot of things have been said about Barack Obama in the past, and I’m not sure I agree with all of them, but one thing is beyond question: the man is a socialist. There is no argument there. Everything in his life up to this point has involved the advancement of socialism. The problem is, the US cannot afford to have a socialist president at this time. Our country is 9 trillion dollars in debt and the last thing we can afford to do is elect a president that is promising trillions in new spending. We have to go in the opposite direction. We have to cut back on spending so we can start paying down the enormous debt. It is also unfair to saddle future generations with debt to pay for social welfare programs for people today. If we continue down the path to full socialism at this time by implementing Obama’s socialist healthcare system, we will destroy any chance the nation has to balance the budget and pay down the debt. If we enact the oppressive tax increases that Obama is proposing, we will bring the economy to a screeching halt and people’s retirement funds will plummet in value. We just can’t afford any more socialism in America at this time.

Posted by: Wisdom | October 18, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

John McCain and the GOP don’t give a crap about struggling families. They never have. All they care about are the rich. Corporate welfare is perfectly fine but heaven forbid the folks that really need a tax break actually get it. Under John McCain’s plan the rich will get richer and the middle-class will get the shaft, the same as they have the last 8 years. You people need to wake up.

Posted by: JimmyTMac | October 18, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Sen. Obama is going to write checks to people who don’t pay taxes. That is welfare.
Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain
————————————-
Obama gets his ideas from Carl Marx. If elected, he would be the first Marxist President of the “American Union” (like in Soviet Union).
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Why is it that these republicans call it socialism when the democrats merely want to shift the tax bracket back where it belongs?
Bush shifted the tax bracket, took money from the middle-class & redistributed it to the rich but you don’t hear these republicans howling socialism when they do it.
So here is the republican logic Robin Hood in reverse is all American but a fair shake to the American worker is socialism.
John McCain’s plan to tax the health care benefits of working Americans to drive them into the ranks of the uninsured is a prime example of his philosophy that the middle-class exist only to serve the rich therefore hard work is not rewarded.
I get so sick of the republican view that Americans have too much. The whole purpose of work is to get ahead so a person can enjoy a better standard of living but the republicans have something against that because they have a sweat shop mentality towards the American worker. Yes we are nothing but a disposable commodity so no health care is required.
After the last 8 years of destruction from republican rule it’s time for a change. Vote for Obama in November.

Posted by: dee | October 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

That’s reight, Obama’s plan will help himself to the plumber’s money and give it to hood rats!

Posted by: nobama | October 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

– implementing Obama’s socialist healthcare system, we will destroy any chance the nation has to balance the budget and pay down the debt. –
You obviously don’t understand, or from what you have written, care about health care in America.
Hint: Both McCain and Obamas plans will cost about the same, but Obamas will provide insurance for more americans and be more efficient in doing so.
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Socialism at it’s best. Come on people? Can you not see it? Obama is “resdistributing” your money…..redistributing to whom? Don’t those of us who go to church give voluntarily? When Katrina hit, didn’t the Country come to the aid of all of the victims? And, remember 9/11, I would imagine most of us, if not all, gave something to those who were so terribly affected? I am already taxed. I worked hard for my money. I went to college on my own, and am still paying loans on it. BUT, Obama wants to take my HARD WORKING money and redistribute it to those who do not want to work as hard as I have? Socialism is what they have in Cuba, Russia, Korea………..where the money is kept for the government, not REDISTRIBUTED to the people. As for my wife, her small business will no longer exist under his plan. She cannot afford to pay for her employee’s health care, let alone survive making just a little over 250k per year. Yeah, Socialism at it’s best. And if anyone has not seen this coming they are blind. Talk about the most liberal in the top seats of the Administration: Obama, Pelosi and Reid. Our Country as we know it now, will be far long gone. And we may find ourselves not being able to vote in four years. Just watch and learn how radical Obama is. His bff’s are quite the true American’s now, aren’t they?

Posted by: weijo | October 18, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Wisdom – The recent $800 billion bailout plan was socialist. You do know that right? John McCain’s plan to buy up people’s mortgages? Yep, that’s socialist too. The $250 billion plan to buy up shares in banks? That’s actually communist. So this socialism you speak of is already happening and it’s coming from a republican administration!!!

Posted by: JimmyTMac | October 18, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Wake up!!!!!!!!We are closing in on One Trillion dollars to boost this economy up in the last month alone. Do you really think thier will be any tax cut coming once anyone of these guys get into offic? Don’t kid yourselves, this isn’t the Nineties and we don’t have the money to do the things that are being promised. We should be demanding some real answers but here we are debating tax cuts that will never happen and programs that we cannot afford start while other government programs that demand action cannot be fixed either.

Posted by: Texan2112 | October 18, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

McCAIN YOU AND YOUR BUDDY PHIL GRAHAM’S DEREGULATION CRASHED THE ECONOMY!
The Graham-Leach act of 1999 removed all of the regulatory protections of the Glass-Stegal Act put in place post Depression in 1932. The Glass-Steagal Act regulations stopped banks from doing exactly what they did in recent years, get to big and run wild!!!
In 2000 Phil Graham came back under George Bush and a Republican Congress and removed the rest of the regulations on financial institutions that eventually led to this entire mess!!!!
This week that earned PHIL GRAHAM an honored place on CNN’s “10 worst culprits” of the current financial crisis!
I don’t see Barnie Frank, Chuck Schumer or Chris Dodd on CNN’s “culprits list!”
And John McCain voted against deregulation time and time again throughout his career in both the House and Senate..
There is no denying these facts and Phil Graham was/is McCain’s principle economic adviser!!
CASE CLOSED!
Let’s elect SMART LEADERS FOR A CHANGE! Obama/Biden ’08!!

Posted by: Davis | October 18, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

No, Doug. It might surprise you to know that college-educated people aren’t guaranteed wealth. Hard-working people without even a high school diploma can make it big in America. You know? It’s the American dream. It’s the beauty of America. It’s about to CHANGE.

Posted by: Kitty | October 18, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Call it what you will Obama, taxing me more to give your hood rats and women with 6 kids and 5 different baby daddys (who don’t support them) is welfare. If Obama gets elected there will be a huge class warfare, and lots of middle class people will merely quit their jobs and join the ranks of the welfare rolls, instead of working to pay for them.

Posted by: nobama | October 18, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

– BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!! –
Ah, Natasha the Russian operative.. for those who don’t know he/she/it is part of a Russian plot to get Palin out of Alaska where she has been diligently watching their planes. Once elected and in Washington, Alaska will be ripe for invasion. Unfortunately, the plot has been exposed, and while Palin will be returning to Alaska in November, she most likely won’t be able to watch Russian planes unless she buys some binoculars and watches from the patio on one of her homes up there.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

The Washington Times
VOIGHT: My concerns for America
Obama sowing socialist seeds in young people
We, as parents, are well aware of the importance of our teachers who teach and program our children. We also know how important it is for our children to play with good-thinking children growing up.
Sen. Barack Obama has grown up with the teaching of very angry, militant white and black people: the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, William Ayers and Rev. Michael Pfleger. We cannot say we are not affected by teachers who are militant and angry. We know too well that we become like them, and Mr. Obama will run this country in their mindset.
The Democratic Party, in its quest for power, has managed a propaganda campaign with subliminal messages, creating a God-like figure in a man who falls short in every way. It seems to me that if Mr. Obama wins the presidential election, then Messrs. Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers and Pfleger will gain power for their need to demoralize this country and help create a socialist America.
The Democrats have targeted young people, knowing how easy it is to bring forth whatever is needed to program their minds. I know this process well. I was caught up in the hysteria during the Vietnam era, which was brought about through Marxist propaganda underlying the so-called peace movement. The radicals of that era were successful in giving the communists power to bring forth the killing fields and slaughter 2.5 million people in Cambodia and South Vietnam. Did they stop the war, or did they bring the war to those innocent people? In the end, they turned their backs on all the horror and suffering they helped create and walked away.
Those same leaders who were in the streets in the ’60s are very powerful today in their work to bring down the Iraq war and to attack our president, and they have found their way into our schools. William Ayers is a good example of that.
Thank God, today, we have a strong generation of young soldiers who know exactly who they are and what they must do to protect our freedom and our democracy. And we have the leadership of Gen. David Petraeus, who has brought hope and stability to Iraq and prevented the terrorists from establishing a base in that country. Our soldiers are lifting us to an example of patriotism at a time when we’ve almost forgotten who we are and what is at stake.
If Mr. Obama had his way, he would have pulled our troops from Iraq years ago and initiated an unprecedented bloodbath, turning over that country to the barbarianism of our enemies. With what he has openly stated about his plans for our military, and his lack of understanding about the true nature of our enemies, there’s not a cell in my body that can accept the idea that Mr. Obama can keep us safe from the terrorists around the world, and from Iran, which is making great strides toward getting the atomic bomb. And while a misleading portrait of Mr. Obama is being perpetrated by a media controlled by the Democrats, the Obama camp has sent out people to attack the greatness of Sen. John McCain, whose suffering and courage in a Hanoi prison camp is an American legend.
Gen. Wesley Clark, who himself has shame upon him, having been relieved of his command, has done their bidding and become a lying fool in his need to demean a fellow soldier and a true hero.
This is a perilous time, and more than ever, the world needs a united and strong America. If, God forbid, we live to see Mr. Obama president, we will live through a socialist era that America has not seen before, and our country will be weakened in every way.
Jon Voight is an Academy Award-winning actor who is well-known for his humanitarian work.
The Washington Times
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/28/voight/

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

ALEX H.
Obama’s tax credits will only go to people working and paying taxes. Why shouldn’t these people be given a break? McCain would rather have that money go to the wealthy.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Talk about a TIDAL WAVE of VOTERS !!!
Bill O’Reilly said it’s not over, but he can hear the Fat Lad warming up.

Posted by: Joe | October 18, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

– Obama wants to take my HARD WORKING money and redistribute it to those who do not want to work as hard as I have? –
Do you make more than $250K? if so, then the modest increase will go towards government spending on such things as homeland security, parks and recreation and so forth.. not to mention paying off that $10 billion a month we are currently spending due to the unprovoked attack on Iraq.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

According to McCain, any progressive tax policy (and guess what, our current income tax system is progressive) is socialist. That’s a stretch and he definitely needs to read up on socialism.
Obama’s plan is to make sure those who work hard can pursue their American dream. It’s about equal opportunity for those who work hard: if you work very hard but still can’t make ends meet, there is something wrong with the system and we need to address it so you can still afford to invest in your as well as your kids’ future.
His tax hikes for the extremely rich are also very modest — just a matter of restoring the tax rates for the rich during the prosperous Clinton era.

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Alex H – your right-wing agenda is showing. You can vote for the worst candidates in history if you like but my vote goes to Obama/Biden. You may not grumble so much when you find their policies benefit you too, that is, unless you make over $250,000. Or, you could return the money.

Posted by: counting crows | October 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Note to self…Nov. 5th…If Obama is elected…quit job…sign up for welfare, food stamps, WIC, housing subsidy , AFDC,

Posted by: nobama | October 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

– Note to self…Nov. 5th…If Obama is elected…quit job…sign up for welfare, food stamps, WIC, housing subsidy , AFDC, –
Note to you – you can already do just that.. what are you waiting for?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

JUST LOOK AT THIS ECONOMY AND TELL ME THE NAMES OF THE SOCIALIST RESPONSIBLE-GW BUSH AND VP-CHENEY-ARE WE OWNED BY CHINA YET? WHO SPENT ALL OUR MONEY ON THE IRAQ WAR? WHO SAID THE WAR WILL CONTINUE A 100 YEARS(MCCAIN)- WHO IS GIVING 700 BILLION TO CORPORATIONS(WELFARE) BUSH- WHO ALLOWED THIS ECONOMY TO BE IN THE TOILET FOR THE LONGEST TIME-BUSH-WHO VOTED WITH BUSH OVER 90% OF THE TIME-MCCAIN–I DIDN’TNAME OBAMA YET ONLY THE REPUBLICANS. MCSAME AND HIS CAMP -MORE OF THE SAME LIES.

Posted by: LOWES | October 18, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

For all the above haters, there are far more people that do not hate and smear.
100,000 people attended the Obama rally in St. Louis.
He will be in Kansas City tonight.
Obama has a good chance to turn Missouri blue

Posted by: Jim | October 18, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

For those of you who do not know
(Un)Concerned American he is an Obama Marxist Comrade who writes under 2 dozen different names in two dozen different blogs spreading the Obama Doctrine – that is Carl Marx’s Doctrine!
He works for ACORN and has been taking lessons on “plagiarism” from Joe Biden!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This is gonna be great. As a mid 50s guy making just under 100k per year, once “The Messiah” takes over I’ve got it all figured out. My house is almost paid for, my 401k and investments despite taking a hit like everyone else lately are still not to bad, and if I stay with it for the next 5-8 years, I’ll bet I come out better than I was before the crash. Within the next couple of years, the only reason I will really need to stay in my profession is for the health care. Once “The Messiah” gets that for me for free, I’m planning on the day I turn 62 to start collecting social security, and any other freebies available to me under the new social order. If I play my cards right, I can suppliment the SS with money from my investments, taking care to keep myself in the “low income” bracket that will keep me rolling in all the new free stuff I will be entitled to. The best part is, it will be all paid for by the youngsters that think The new Messiahs brand of socialism is the way to go. Well, if you already have a nice pile of paid for assests, it very well just might be. I’ve already got mine, I’ll be happy to get some of yours too.

Posted by: On the dole soon | October 18, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Alex H – you’re a real ‘richard cranium’, aren’t you? Fear-mongering and spreading the GOP lies like the good little sheep you are. And yes, I typed this slowly so maybe you will comprehend what I say: Mccain will lose, Obama will win, and everyone benefits, including jerks like you.

Posted by: SearamblerOne | October 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

nobama, Oct 18, 2008 4:28:30 PM W WROTE THIS:
Call it what you will Obama, taxing me more to give your hood rats and women with 6 kids and 5 different baby daddys (who don’t support them) is welfare. If Obama gets elected there will be a huge class warfare, and lots of middle class people will merely quit their jobs and join the ranks of the welfare rolls, instead of working to pay for them…..
I GUESS YOU MAKE OVER 250K A YEAR IF SO WHY ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT AN EXTRA $100 IN TAXES…I MAKE MORE THAN THAT AND I AM OKAY WITH PAYING TAXES ARE YOU CHEAP OR SOMETHING…COME ON BE AMERICAN AND PAY YOUR DAMN TAXES…PEOPLE ARE HURTING…

Posted by: Jesse Helms | October 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

By saying that Obama’s tax cuts represent welfare because many are not paying federal income taxes, McCain implies that Obama’s plan is to reward slackers. This is misleading. As Obama explained clearly, his tax cuts are only for those who work. And all who work have to pay paroll taxes (not to mention they also pay sales taxes).
As an upper-middle class income earner, I have the feeling that I am gaining more from the tax system than those earning much less than me. Take tax exemptions on mortgage interest payments as an example. Aren’t those exemptions welfare to people who can afford a house?
It’s time for the relatively well-off to do a bit of soul-searching. Our stereotypes rarely describe reality, folks.

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

– He works for ACORN –
Ah yes, ACORN:
New Mexico Incident Highlights Republican Suppression Scheme
“This is un-American,” said Celestina Balderas, an ACORN leader. “What we have learned today is that a new citizen who votes in America now risks getting attacked by the Republican Party. ACORN will not allow this scare off new, legitimate voters.”
“What these Republican operatives did is criminal,” said ACORN member Dana Gallegos. “They violated these voters’ privacy, and they want to deprive them of their right to vote. These kinds of dirty tricks tear at the fabric of our democracy. We demand an apology from the Republican Party, and we demand that Senator McCain denounce these partisan scare tactics.”
http://www.acorn.org

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

For those who don’t agree with then I’d suggest you send back your “stimulus” check that you most likely cashed.

Posted by: Deb | October 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

The Boston Herald
October 11, 2008
It is what it is: Obama allied with scoundrels
In the best tradition of Bill Clinton’s declaration that the answer to the question of whether he was having an affair depended on “what the definition of is is,” Sen. Barack Obama was clearly concealing the truth when he said that William Ayers was “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood.”
The Ayers-Obama connection was, in fact, an intimate collaboration that it led to the only executive or administrative experience in Obama’s life.
After Walter Annenberg’s foundation offered several hundred million dollars to American public schools in the mid-’90s, Ayers applied for $50 million for Chicago. His purpose was to “raise political consciousness” in schools.
After he won the grant, Ayers’ group chose Obama to distribute the $50 million, and the future senator raised another $60 million from other civic groups to augment it. In doing so, he was following Ayers’ admonition to grant the funds to “external” organizations, like American Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), to pair with schools and conduct programs to radicalize and politicize the students.
Reading, math and science achievement tests counted for little in the grants, but the school’s success in preaching a radical agenda determined how much money it got.
Obama should have run screaming at the sight of Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers has admitted bombing the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon, and his wife was imprisoned for failing to cooperate in solving the robbery of a Brink’s car in which two police were killed. Far from remorse, Ayers told The New York Times [NYT], in September 2001, that he wished he “could have done more.” Ayers only avoided conviction when the evidence against him turned out to be contained in illegal wiretaps. He was, in fact, guilty as sin.
So let’s sum up Obama’s Chicago connections. His chief financial supporter was Tony Rezko, now on his way to prison. His spiritual adviser was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, of “God damn America” fame. And the guy who got him his only administrative job is former terrorist Ayers.
Not a good recommendation for a president.
© The Boston Herald and Herald Media.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1124922

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

For all of you who think you have this election in the bag–you may be right. But make damn sure this is what you want. I think Obama’s supporters are going to be extremely upset when they discover their golden boy can’t keep all of the promises he made. He’s a one term President at best and will be nothing more than a blurb in American History 150 years from now. If this nation survives that long–God willing!! I admit Obama has some good ideas–but his rapid advancement to the top is too much too soon and he will fall flat on his face because of his lack of experience. And I truely believe that Pelosi and Reid are the ones who holds the purse strings will impose their personal agendas onto Obama’s administration (thus Obama never really being in control).

Posted by: fooled no more | October 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Pro-Bama so racist relocate.

Posted by: Didi | October 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This presentation is a must watch for the left-wing-liberal media clowns and all “morally sound” American fellows.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Alex H.
Go read Barack Hussein Obama’s tax plan instead of spewing lies.
McCain must have just released his talking points for the day.

Posted by: karen | October 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

The New York Times trashes Obama’s Health Care Plan…
Health Plan From Obama Spurs Debate
By KEVIN SACK
It is one of the most audacious promises in a campaign that has been thick with them.
In speech after speech, Senator Barack Obama has vowed that he will lower the country’s health care costs enough to “bring down premiums by $2,500 for the typical family.” Moreover, Mr. Obama, the presumptive Democratic nominee, has promised that his health plan will be in place “by the end of my first term as president of the United States.”
Whether Mr. Obama can deliver is a matter of considerable dispute among health analysts and economists. While there is consensus that the American health care system is bloated with waste, eliminating enough to save $2,500 per family would require simultaneous and synergistic solutions to a host of problems that have proved intractable for decades.
Even if the next president and Congress can muster the political will, analysts question whether significant savings would materialize in as little as four years, or even in 10. But as Mr. Obama confronts an electorate that is deeply unsettled by escalating health costs, he is offering a precise “chicken in every pot” guarantee based on numbers that are largely unknowable. Furthermore, it is not completely clear what he is promising.
His words about lowering “premiums” by $2,500 for the average family of four have been fairly consistent. But the health policy advisers who formulated the figure say it actually represents the average family’s share of savings not only in premiums paid by individuals, but also in premiums paid by employers and in tax-supported health programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
“What we’re trying to do,” said one of the advisers, David M. Cutler, in explaining the gap between Mr. Obama’s words and his intent, “is find a way to talk to people in a way they understand.”
The original arithmetic was somewhat basic. In May 2007, three Harvard professors who are unpaid advisers to the Obama campaign — Mr. Cutler, David Blumenthal and Jeffrey Liebman — produced a memorandum offering their “best guess” that a menu of changes would produce savings of at least $200 billion a year (it has since been revised to $214 billion). That would amount to about 8 percent of the $2.5 trillion in health care spending projected for 2009, when the next president takes office.
The memorandum attributed specific savings to several broad initiatives, with the numbers plucked from recent studies. Investments in computerized medical records would save $77 billion a year, the advisers wrote. Reducing administrative costs in the insurance industry would yield up to $46 billion. Improving prevention programs and chronic disease management would be worth $81 billion.
The total savings were then divided by the country’s population, multiplied for a family of four, and rounded down slightly to a number that was easy to grasp: $2,500. The average cost of family coverage bought through an employer was $12,106 in 2007, with workers paying $3,281 of that amount, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a health research group.
Mr. Obama aspires to cover the country’s 47 million uninsured by requiring insurers to accept all comers, regardless of their health status, and by providing generous tax credits to low-income workers. The tax credits could be used to buy into a new federal health plan or private plans marketed through a government exchange.
The subsidies are expensive, estimated at well over $100 billion. Other components of the Obama plan also bear up-front costs, like a pledge to spend $50 billion over five years to speed the computerization of health records, $6 billion a year on tax credits to small businesses that provide coverage to workers, and an unspecified amount to buffer businesses from high-cost insurance claims.
The source Mr. Obama has identified to pay for them — the repeal of President Bush’s tax cuts for those making more than $250,000 — would cover only about half. That means additional health care savings would be needed, not only to keep premiums under control but also to help pay for the subsidies.
A consensus has emerged among health economists that at least a third of the country’s spending on health care is unnecessary. Both Mr. Obama, of Illinois, and his Republican rival, Senator John McCain of Arizona, agree that significant sums could be saved through reductions in unneeded procedures and improvements in electronic record-keeping, prevention and chronic disease management.
But the dollar values Mr. Obama has attached to individual components of his plan are beginning to attract scrutiny. In particular, the Congressional Budget Office issued a report in May questioning the amount to be saved from the computerization of health systems.
Mr. Obama took his estimate of $77 billion a year from a 2005 study by the RAND Corporation (which cautioned that reductions of that magnitude would not emerge for 15 years). The Congressional analysts found, however, that for various methodological reasons the RAND study was “not an appropriate guide” to potential savings.
This month, Mr. Obama’s health advisers tried to recast the debate so that the questioning of any one number would not undermine the plan’s broader credibility. They enlisted eight health policy experts to sign a letter that, without endorsing the math behind any single initiative, proclaimed it was “not only possible, but likely” that Mr. Obama could save $200 billion annually. They did not say by when.
Mr. Cutler, who helped collect the signatures, said he and his colleagues had decided “that our attempt to lay out one plausible scenario for the savings had created more problems than it had solved.” He added: “Putting the debate where this message puts it — do you believe we can save 8 percent of health spending through a major series of public and private reforms — asks the question in a way that is much more productive than the issue of ‘Do you believe a single estimate among many, many studies?’ ”
Mr. Obama’s economic policy director, Jason Furman, said the campaign’s estimates were conservative and asserted that much of the savings would come quickly. “We think we could get to $2,500 in savings by the end of the first term, or be very close to it,” Mr. Furman said.
The campaign won additional backing this week from Kenneth E. Thorpe of Emory University, an authority on health care costs who helped formulate Bill Clinton’s failed plan in 1993. In an assessment that he initiated in coordination with the campaign, Mr. Thorpe wrote that if all of Mr. Obama’s proposals were enacted they would reduce health spending by between $203 billion and $273 billion by 2012. He calculated that half of the savings would accrue to the federal government.
The Obama advisers said that while not all of the savings would translate into lower premiums, consumers would gain in other ways. The savings to employers would be passed along as higher wages, they predicted, and the savings to government would eventually mean either lower taxes or added benefits.
But whether employers and governments respond that way cannot be guaranteed, particularly in a difficult economy. And a number of health policy experts have questioned whether the $2,500 projection is either fiscally or politically realistic. Reducing health care costs, they emphasized, means taking money from someone’s pocket and rationing care that Americans have come to expect, a recipe for stiff resistance.
“There is no easy money because, as the saying goes, one person’s fraud and abuse is another person’s income,” said Joseph R. Antos of the American Enterprise Institute. “I wouldn’t think that four years or eight years or probably 10 years will be enough to see numbers of that sort.”
The Commonwealth Fund, a health research group in New York, published a study in December projecting that a robust overhaul consisting of 15 broad initiatives would generate savings of only 6 percent after 10 years. “Doing it by the end of a first term is ambitious and would require tough policies,” said Karen Davis, the group’s president.
Jonathan B. Oberlander, who teaches health policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, called it wishful thinking. “Do they have the potential to generate significant savings in the long run?” Dr. Oberlander asked. “Yes. Do I believe they will produce substantial savings in the short run that can be used to finance Obama’s plan? No.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/us/23health.html?_r=1&ref=policy&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

It’s not really complicated, Obama is playing Robin Hood to some degree here. Wealth redistribution has been going on for a long time and we are not a purely capitalist country (less so with Bush’s recent interventions). Sarah Palin did the same thing by taxing oil company profits.
My suggestion is to worry about your own pocketbooks. Those of us in the position to be hit by Obama’s tax increase have other avenues at our disposal to reduce our tax burden.

Posted by: 1percenter | October 18, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

whoa! what a turn of events! Sen. Obama says “I’m not giving tax cuts to folks who don’t work (pay any income tax), I’m giving tax cuts to people who do work (and pay income tax).” But we know 40% of all workers don’t pay ANY federal income tax. Therefore, when Sen. Obama used to say he’s going to cut taxes for 95% of all working Americans (as opposed to Sen. McCain’s tax cuts for 100% of all tax-paying Americans), he’s going to now have to say 55% of all working Americans (as opposed to Sen. McCain’s 60% of all working Americans)

Posted by: DemMcCrats for McCain | October 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I just love how the fascists call Obama’s tax plan socialist.

Posted by: Rob D | October 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

wisdom:
What is wise about your foolish comments about senator Obama?
The word “Wisdom” should be associated with King Jesus and king Soloman…..
Why are you using this sacred word to spread hate and division?

Posted by: shalom | October 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

You guys really think trickle-down works?

Posted by: 1percenter | October 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

– I admit Obama has some good ideas–but his rapid advancement to the top is too much too soon and he will fall flat on his face because of his lack of experience. –
“Every politician who’s ever run for president gins himself to be the embodiment of the best things America perceives about itself, but Obama was doing so after seven years in which the country, steadily and fearfully, had abandoned in practice all those things it still believed about itself in theory. He was attempting to redefine American Exceptionalism–a concept that has done more good than harm in the world–for a new century in which America has been a lot of things, but exceptional isn’t one of them.”
From Esquire – 75 most important people of the 21st Century
http://www.esquire.com/features/75-most-influential/barack-obama-1008

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Wake up Republicans. Aren’t you sick of what your administration put this country through, including yourselves (unless you’re in the top 2% income bracket, of course)the last seven years. Deregulation led to the $700,000,000,000 (see all those zeros?)bail out that is now on the taxpayers’ backs. That goes to the top of the list of the Royal Republican Screw Jobs! What does McCain believe in? Deregulation? When are you going to open your eyes and see that his true interests lie in the well-being of the major corporations (haven’t they made enough profits thanks to the Bush Administration??) and not the common people of our country? Sorry, I can’t even begin to trust any of his promises when the word “deregulation” is thrown out there.
Obama is our best hope for giving our country back to us and not special interests. Most importantly, he is the candidate that has refrained from allowing racist and sleazy, desperate tactics to dominate his campaign. Speaking of racism, anyone want to Google McCain and Richard Quinn, and find out about a white supremist campaign advisor of his not too long ago ?

Posted by: PaizPlease | October 18, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

There obviously will be a lot of sad Bush/McCain supporters come Nov. 4th….
With all the hate and disgusting words against Obama…….you losers still will lose…..

Posted by: shalom | October 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Wow the fear and racism of the right wingers in your country sure comes to the surface when they are faced with an election loss. What I don’t understand is this “Joe the plumber” apparently owes over $1000 in back taxes, works under the table and has a lien against his house for unpaid medical bills. This guy makes far less than 250K but his main concern was one day having to pay a couple percent more if he ever made over 250K. What an idiot! Any intelligent person would ask why he has to pay thousands for health care and might lose his house. You can bet he’ll be voting McCain though. People’s stupidity amazes me.

Posted by: Canada4obama | October 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

How about McCain’s questionable associates?___JOSEPH “JOE BANANAS” BONANO: Bonano crime family, who had retired to Arizona.____
DONALD R. DIAMOND: political favors for real estate developer Donald R. Diamond. McCain stepped in to use official clout to facilitate sale of land that Diamond had wanted..____
REP. RICK RENZI (R-AZ) co-chair of McCain’s Arizona Leadership Team indicted for extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other charges related to a land deal in Arizona.
CHARLES KEATING. Keating had called on McCain, among other Senators to help him resist regulators in exchange for the money. ___
LOBBYISTS ON HIS CAMPAIGN STAFF. McCain has at least 159 lobbyists, on leave from their firms, running his campaign operation. It’s why McCain has defended lobbyists and the lobbying industry over and over again. ___
VICKI ISEMAN– PAXON TELECOM. McCain denied an affaireven though he had admitted it in a legal deposition.
RICHARD QUINN. In the 2000 primary, McCain paid $20,000 a month to South Carolina consultant Richard Quinn, a NEO-CONFEDERATE REVANCHIST ;who advocated voting for David Duke___
CHARLES BLACK JR.: …campaign adviser of McCain has friends in low places. Defended McCain’s relationship with telecom lobbyist Vicki Iseman ….lobbying clients included General Motors, United Technologies, JPMorgan and AT&T.___
SENATOR PHIL) GRAMM architect of deregulation which led to Enron and the subprime mortgage meltdown.,
“PASTOR” JOHN HAGEE: believes Pope is the Anti-Christ, believes Jews responsible for their own suffering …advocates starting a war with Iran in the Middle East to ‘hasten Armageddon’___
JACK ABRAMOFF: McCain trying to escape ties to criminal lobbyists Jack Ahramoff, Randy Scheunemann and Ralph Reed. ___
RANDY SCHEUNEMANN, Scheunemann was lobbying for the Republic of Georgia – yet now, he’s advising McCain on Georgia and Russiap conflict____
RALPH REED: Abramoff crony Abramoff directed at least $4.2 million to Reed as he defrauded Indians, McCain never called Reed to testify before the Senate .____
There is a whole cast of corrupt McCain advisors and fundraisers who prove how deeply McCain embedded is in the Republican culture of corruption -
Source: .____http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20080815/pl_usnw/dnc__mccain_watch__scheunemann__abramoff__and_reed____
CRAIG BERKMAN borrowed $5 million.from the investors whose funds he controlled without their permission, and even failed to tell “most” of them what he had done. A two-year suit against Berkman was decided in July 2008, when a jury found he had defrauded investors and ordered him to pay them $28 million.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

We have paid Taxes all our lives and deserve middle class tax break and Healthcare plan.
Some people have such low self esteem that they believe all breaks should go to the Rich. A stronger middle class will help those on the top and bottom.
Corporations profits increase when the middle class buy goods and services.
We also give more to the poor.
Our food pantries are empty and calling on donations. When people are worried about jobs and healthcare they don’t donations decrease. Obama/Biden have polices that will help this country.

Posted by: Pat | October 18, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

GOOGLE: The Title Of The Article: “MAKE BELIEVE MAVERICK: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE LIFE AND CAREER OF JOHN McCAIN REVEALS A DISTURBING RECORD OF RECKLESSNESS, AND DISHONESTY”

Posted by: No McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Consider this – Corporations are answerable to their stockholders (that means all of us if we have a 401k), and the stockholders demand a profit, which helps to ensure the value of the stock. When the corporations are taxed at a higher rate, they still need to maintain their profits for the stockholders, so any increase in taxes will be passed into the prices of the goods and services causing inflation. So much for the tax cuts to the middle class – they will be eaten up with the inflation, causing the consumers to purchase less. Then add in the fact that if corporations are paying more for the goods and services to make their own goods and services, they will not be able to expand their businesses and would likely contract. Job losses are the inevitable result. Nothing operates in a vacuum.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

GOOGLE: The Title Of The Article: “MAKE BELIEVE MAVERICK: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE LIFE AND CAREER OF JOHN McCAIN REVEALS A DISTURBING RECORD OF RECKLESSNESS, AND DISHONESTY”

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Senator Obama has (once again) exposed Senator McCain as the emperor who has no clothes of his own…and wants yours. His economic plans are a shambles, his credibility is a farcce and his sensitivity to what most Americans are experiencing is nil. He and his wife are decades-long millionaires — what can he possibly know of the economic fears of most Americans? Give me Senator and Mrs. Obama — they are only a few short years away from paying off huge student loans. Senator McCain didn’t need ‘em (he was legacy at the US Naval Academy) and Mrs. McCain…was already rich.

Posted by: nomoredynasties | October 18, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

– The New York Times trashes Obama’s Health Care Plan. –
I just love it when people like Natasha bring up the New York TImes article, which uses the Commonwealth Fund analysis as it’s source.. What does the Commonwealth Fund say about the two health plans?
“Measured against these broad principles, Obama’s proposal for mixed private–public group insurance with a shared responsibility for financing has greater potential to move the health care system toward high performance than does McCain’s proposal to encourage individual market coverage through the use of tax incentives and deregulation (Figure ES-4). Compared with McCain’s approach, Obama’s approach could provide more people with affordable health insurance that covers essential services, achieve greater equity in access to care, realize efficiencies and cost savings in the provision of coverage and delivery of care, and redirect incentives to improve quality.”
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/publications_show.htm?doc_id=707948
Pretty much what the Tax Policy Center says as well:
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126
As well as the analysis by the Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122152292213639569.html

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Ironic, 95% of taxpayers will get a tax cut, that included the middle class and others who have been deserted by Bush’s administration, yet the poster boy for McCain’s recent attacks, Joe the plumber admitted that he will benefit from Obama’s tax plan, whilst not admitting that he doesn’t some of his taxes, I am sure after the recent media interest, Joe will take care of that oversight…I guess all that people complaining about Obama’s tax plan are in McCain middle class of the 2% of the population making over $250,000 per annum…

Posted by: s.orram | October 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

100,000 people attended the Obama rally in St. Louis.
Posted by: Jim
————————————–
It reminds me a Fidel/Raoul Castro rally! It certainly looked as if we are undergoing an “October [COMMUNIST]Revolution” right here in America.
OBAMA IS A MARXIST. MARXIST RALLIES HISTORICALLY HAVE BEEN HUGE
(LOTS OF MORONS ATTEND THEM)

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

The GOP is falling apart, not because of Palin or McCain, but because of its platform. Americans are finally realizing the depth to which the GOP has harmed this nation. We have fallen behind at almost every level. Education in math and science, broad band access, healthcare quality and affordability, technological advances, the climate crisis… and especially alternative energy development… And what is the GOP response? “Drill Baby Drill.” This is preposterous to any thinking person, and on November 4th, the Republicans will lose not only the White house, but Congressional seats, and governorships.
Thank you – Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Virginia, Missouri, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Nevada, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Oregon, Washington, California, North Carolina, New Mexico, New Jersey, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Illinois, DC, and New Hampshire!
Next to add, hopefully within a few days, Missouri and Indiana. For the rest of you it’s still not too late to be added to the list. The only way the GOP is going to get back to The “Grand Old Party” of Abraham Lincoln is to send a strong message of decent.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Senator Obama will be raising the taxes for those making over $250 thousand until it is returned to the equivalent rate of that noted and dreaded Socialist, Ronald Regan! Republicans need to get serious! This is not a radical change and is beneficial to those who are currently bearing the brunt of the tax burden as supported by numerous independent scholars. Take the time to learn the facts.

Posted by: Mark | October 18, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Barack Obama Couldn’t Pass a Routine Background Investigation
By Gregory D. Lee
Retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent
October 10, 2008
A while back, radio talk show host Michael Savage brought up the notion that Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Barack Obama couldn’t pass a background investigation to become an FBI special agent.
He doesn’t know how right he is.
Sen. Barack Obama wouldn’t pass a routine government background investigation, not only to become an FBI agent, but a police officer as well. If he were a soldier, his background would preclude him from obtaining a security clearance. He wouldn’t even qualify to be a support person in a federal agency, such as secretary, for that matter. His past cocaine usage disqualifies him from being a DEA agent.
There’s another big problem Sen. Obama has: His association and business relationship with Weatherman Underground founder William Ayers, a former domestic terrorist who is still unrepentant for his bombings on U.S. landmarks and police stations. Usually, the company you keep reveals who you really are. Ayers felt then, as he does now, that America is the evil of the world and needs punishing for past and current bad acts. Not many federal agencies would want someone with that kind of chip on his shoulder working for it.
Also, Sen. Obama’s association with Tony Rezko and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) come to mind. Rezko was just convicted of promoting corruption among Chicago politicians. He helped in the purchase of the senator’s home and was a campaign fundraiser for Obama. ACORN is being investigated by the feds for systematic voter registration fraud. Not good things.
Let’s not forget about Sen. Obama’s pastor and mentor for 20 years, America-hater Rev. Jeremiah Wright. When first questioned about his membership in Wright’s black theology church, Sen. Obama first denied knowing Rev. Wright harbored such negative feelings about the U.S., but after being further pressed, he dismissed the reverend’s conduct as like a “crazy uncle” who lived in the basement. He finally decided that he couldn’t politically afford to stay in the church, and dropped his membership.
To keep job applicants honest, many government agencies such as DEA, FBI, CIA and others require them to take a polygraph examination. Do you think Sen. Obama could pass a polygraph when he approves an ad that mocks Sen. John McCain for being unable to send e-mails without mentioning his poorly mended broken arms while in custody of the North Vietnamese which prevents him from manipulating the computer keyboard? He’s not computer illiterate, he’s handicapped!
Would you want a police officer in your city associating with such people? Not likely. But Obama supporters ignore these associations because they are desperate for a Democrat in the White House.
A federal government full-field background investigation would also look for prior inconsistencies, exaggerations and outright lies on an application for employment.
I once conducted a background check for an applicant to become a secretary for DEA. She had previously worked for a large police department as a secretary, and left the job to have a child. She was ready to re-enter the workforce and wanted to work for DEA. She seemed perfect for the job until the background investigation revealed that she lied on her application. She claimed to have 30-semester hours of college in office management, when in reality she attended one day of one class and then dropped out. The fact that she lied was sufficient justification to consider her application no further. After all, if she would lie about that, what else has she lied about? Obviously the woman lacked integrity, which is a vital qualification for any position within the federal government, even a DEA secretary who would have access to all investigative reports.
I’d like to conduct Sen. Obama’s background investigation. I’d review his application for the Illinois state bar and see if he mentioned the drug usage that he disclosed in one of his books. If the question about drugs was asked, and he denied it at the time, his integrity is immediately put into question. He revealed it in his book to float a balloon to test his potential as a viable presidential candidate. Admitting it prevented his political opponents from attacking him about it. In fact, in the eyes of many Sen. Obama supporters, using drugs enhances his resume. It’s something they can relate to.
Personally I like my presidents to not associate with known criminals, be drug-free for a lifetime, have unquestioned integrity and be able to pass a simple background investigation.
Gregory D. Lee is a nationally syndicated columnist and a retired DEA Supervisory Special Agent. He can be reached at http://www.gregorydlee.com.
http://www.northstarwriters.com/gl045.htm

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Bravo, indevotoer!!

Posted by: nomoredynasties | October 18, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

After this years election, the Republican Party will never be the same. They had a maverick (that no longer is a maverick)to run for president, a vp that is an airhead and a lier. They have run the wost campaign in history, so erratic it’s not funny. The dirty, negative lies, the racism, is just terrible. My question is were this two the best the Republicans could come up with? It can’t be so, Republicans have better leaders they just did not come out this time. Americans are tired of all this negative stuff, we are at our worst ever. Losing jobs, mortgage close, education 16th in the world, healthcare expensive, tax cuts for the rich only, gasoline high, international affairs at the lowest ever,we can’t keep on like this. We need a leader that many like and follow, Obama, he has shown he can be a good positive leader. We will all say present on Novenber 4th for the good of a united Nation, Vote Obama/Biden 08.

Posted by: mark | October 18, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I can not believe the American public is so naieve. If you tax a corporation more, the corporation will simply pass the cost to the end user. If you tax a corporation more, the shareholders are hurt. Who are the shareholders? You are! Just look at your IRA or 401k. What do you own? Exxon, IBM, CocaCola. That’s right folks. Tax the corporations more. That way the oil companies will not produce more. That way your car will cost more. That way your retirement plan will not grow.
It is welfare when you GIVE free money to those who do not pay any INCOME TAX at all. That is 35-40% of all tax return filers.
Yeah, let’s tax the rich some more. Let’s squeeze them ’til they bleed. Then when they no longer hire people, no longer create jobs, quit starting new businesses, you can all stand in the unemployment line together.
How many jobs have you had working for a poor person?

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

– When the corporations are taxed at a higher rate, they still need to maintain their profits for the stockholders, so any increase in taxes will be passed into the prices of the goods and services causing inflation. –
Except Obama will not change the corporate tax structure and will leave it as it is.
In addition, there are so many tax loopholes in the current tax code, most corporates pay zero in federal taxes.. for example:
“Cisco Systems, the second-most valuable company in America, paid no federal income taxes for its latest fiscal year thanks to a little-known corporate tax break on employee stock options.”
“Microsoft, which ranks No. 4 in market value, did not pay any federal taxes either, it seems.”
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/10/09/MN3707.DTL

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Natasha
Let’s follow this logic: Obama has huge rallies. Marxists have been known to have huge rallies. Therefore, Obama is a Marxist.
Um, I think you missed a couple steps there. Maybe you should take that logic class over again.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

McCain is to old for president. Sarah Palin have to many personal issues and hatred to be VP. I believe in freedom of religion but I don’t want someone who gets a ritual performed on her to protect her from witches representing this country. She told the Group that want Alaska to become indepedent of the USA what a great job they are doing at their convention. I don’t know how she can get a Security clearance to be VP.

Posted by: Pat | October 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

– It reminds me a Fidel/Raoul Castro rally! … (LOTS OF MORONS ATTEND THEM) –
Guess so.. it appears you did!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

It’s amazing how stupid all you right wing nutcases are. 8 years of a republican in the white house, and control of Congress for 10 out of the last 12 years, and look at the mess we’re in. What kind of an idiot keeps wanting to do the same thing, and expects a different result? And Sarah Palin? The most irresponsible, pathetic choice for a vice president in modern history. All Obama wants to do with taxes is bring them back up to the level they were in the 1990′s (you remember, when we had peace, prosperity, income growth, and a DEMOCRATIC president) for people making over $250K a year. If I’m fortunate enough to make that much next year, I’ll be more than happy to pay the extra 3% tax on my income over $250K because a strong economy, paying as we go for what we need, and maintaining our military and infrastructure is good for EVERYONE!

Posted by: Ken in Seattle | October 18, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Concerned American – you can cite a few oddball cases all you want. Most of the corporations in this country that hire (and provide the livelihood for all of us) do not fall into these scenarios. You do realize that the upper 5% of the individual taxpayers already pay 65% of the income taxes in this country, don’t you? And don’t jump down my throat – we fall in the middle class.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

This is for the real Americans, this guy Joe The Plumber represents most of us, the middle class, mainstreet and the respect that now Bidden and Obama are showing is a disgrace, now why did he not stop people from laughing at him at his rally when he pokes fun at Joe The Plumber and why cause he stated that one day he would like to buy a plumbing company, he never said he owned one or was ready to own one.
I’m sorry but this goes to show me the type of Presidential respect he has for the middle class. This man as most of Americans respect this country and are known to love it, this is the land opportunity and why should our dreams be made fun of? How dare he put this mans pursuit of Happiness down the toilet. Who says that a plumber can’t grow his business to make the $250,000 threshold? There are plenty of people like Joe at this time, people that are behind in taxes, mortgage payments, utilities, car payments and many other bills. And those are the same people that Obama and Bidden are parading around making fun of? Is that is Presidential? The worst part is that Obama approached him, he went to his neighborhood, his house and was asked a question that showed to the rest of America a real view of his Socialist plan.

Posted by: Devon | October 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

HIS TAXES ARE NOT WELFARAE?
YEAH, OBAMA, THE SNAKE OIL SALESMAN, RAP ARTIST… THE ONE..
THIS GUY HAS LIED SO MUCH HE IS BEGINNING TO BELIEVE HIS OWN LIES
WHO WAS WHISPERING TO JOE THE PLUMBER ABOUT “SREADING THE WEALTH”
THAT WAS THE REAL OBAMA.
AMERICA MAY BE AT ITS LAST DAYS IF OBAMA WINS.. ANOTHER SUPERPOWER WILL RISE.. IF ITS EUROPE, WE ARE LUCKY
IF MUSLIM TERRORSITS .. WE ARE DOOMED..
TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT AMERICA
IT MAY NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN
YOU GOT 2 WEEKS TO ..

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | October 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Alex H.
How very offensive your message is…I don’t need to read slowly…I don’t NEED to read your message at all.
Your chance to attempt an explanation of something as you saw it was lost because of your disrespectful and condescending attitude.
You seem to be just exactly the type of republican that we all learned to disdain….you and people like you are what prevent meaningful dialogue and squander the chance to get anything done in Congress.

Posted by: Southern IL | October 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Natasha,
Senator McCain made a dozen tapes during his incarceration in North Vietnam. They all denounced the USA. I would no more want to delve into his horrifying time as a POW than I would into Senator Obama’s teenage drug experimentation. That was then, this is now. The now, unfortunately for Senator McCain, has passed him by. He should have been running against Al Gore in 2000, rather than fighting GWB and his hatchetmen. So be it. Senator Obama has the stronger gift of leadership — steadier, deeper and more nuanced. Forget passing some idiotic security test — I want somebody who will be taken seriously by world leaders … not just some DEA/FBI/DHS pass-along!

Posted by: nomoredynasties | October 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Everytime the Republican candidates run for the presidency, they always claim they will lower our taxes. Or so they claim.
But My taxes are never lowered. I am the working middle class tax paying American Citizen who never gets a tax break under any Republican administration. And neither will you.

Posted by: mere | October 18, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

CPA
So, your alternative is that we should all eagerly give our money to the wealthy, in hopes that they might allow some of it to trickle back down to us. Really, then, it would be best if the wealthy paid no taxes at all, right? The middle-class should shoulder the ENTIRE tax burden, right?
Have you ever considered BALANCE?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Natasha u r a f-o-x n-u-t

Posted by: Dr. Cross | October 18, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

– There are plenty of people like Joe at this time, people that are behind in taxes, mortgage payments, utilities, car payments and many other bills. And those are the same people that Obama and Bidden are parading around making fun of? –
Umm, in case you missed it, “Joe” (Sam) the plumber would get a bigger tax cut under Obama than under McCains tax plan.
Under McCain, you won’t see a tax cut unless you earn over $100K, which might be the average “Joe” on McCains street, but not around typical America.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

“Michelle Obama first lady……ROFL thats funny more like first charcter in the Planet of the Apes” NOW THAT YOU MENTION IT, SHE DOES HAVE A STRIKING RESEMBLANCE TO ZERA! BUT NOWHERE NEAR THE SCRUPLES! MICHELLE SHOULD BE BANISHED FROM THE USA.”
hahahaha! we’ll call her,
FIRST GORILLA!

Posted by: Oprah Winfrey | October 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

wow–there sure is a lot of hate and ignorance on this abc sight. can’t do much about the hate…you people will just have to wallow in it, but I will pray for you–and maybe I can shed some light on your ignorance.
1. Don’t believe the fear-mongers that Obama is Marxist. Bush and Co. just ensured the biggest Marxist bailout of people on Wall Street who make tons more than all ya’ll. Obama is a capitalist–make no mistake–but our current tax structure allows for too many loopholes for the rich and not enough for the hardworking poor. He just wants taxes distributed more equitably. Instead of believing hate groups’fear-mongering robo-calls, read economic analysts’ plans and watch the right-leaning mainstream media…they always have folks on to explain how each candidates’ plan will affect real taxpayers.
2. deregulation helps no one…now it’s suddenly convenient that McCain is a deregulator? Don’t believe it. The only one he listens to is Gramm, who is the granddaddy of all federal deregulation. Hmmmm….remember Enron? A product of deregulation. When our utilities were deregulated, did your power bill go down? When telecom and media were deregulated, did your phone bills, your cable bills go down? Deregulation allowed Wall Street to invest in shadow securities and derivatives that will all come tumbling down soon, worse than what has already happened.
3. Because someone wants sane, sensible deregulation, does not mean they are a marxist. It only means that they want our growth to occur at a sensible and controlled rate. Obama’s plans will work for you, and it saddens me to think that you are so blinded by right-wing haters that you don’t see it.
Your hate-filled, name -calling only reflects poorly on you. It makes me sad to see what has happened to our once thoughtful, Christian nation. That is why I am voting for Obama. He has not lied, like McCain and Palin over and over again, and has demonstrated an ethical, Christ-centered wisdom that would serve our country well in the coming tough years.

Posted by: anotherpatricia | October 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Natasha
Obama is a United States Senator. He has all the security clearance he needs, thank you very much. And he will have even more after we elect him President.
Apparently many millions of Americans have a different assessment of Obama than you do. Isn’t democracy great?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

As president, Obama is likely to greatly increase government funding to his favorite grass root organization ACORN, which is notorious for recent voter registration fraud as well as forcing the banks to comply with the Community reinvestment Act to lend subprime mortgage to low income residents.

Posted by: austin | October 18, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Seems like all the right wing nutjobs are out in force today….what’s the matter folks? Not working today or did you make so much last week you need to sit at the computer posting lies to earn your McCain brownie points for that new non-union made t-shirt?
Oh, and for Natasha….if you want your president not to hang around with known criminals, you need to looks for someone besides McCain…he and G. Gordon Liddy are BFFs…..
Oh, that’s right….a non-repentent domestic terrorist is ok if he served jail time….pardon me….I get so confused with how the McCain camp changes the rules to suit themselves.

Posted by: Southern IL | October 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

McCain has moved his campaign to finally focus on the economy however he is using the same tired old lines Republicans have been using since I was old enough to vote. He’s trying to say don’t vote for Obama, he will raise your taxes. He is trying to scare Americans that if they vote for Obama they will lose their jobs. Republican’s have been using that same line for at least the last 40 years in every local, state and federal race. He conveniently leaves out his real concern. All Obama plans to do is eliminate the tax break Bush gave to the rich that helped create the largest deficit in American history and give a tax break to the Americans that need it. The middle class are the engine to our economy, not the rich. If the middle class has money to spend the economy runs smoothly and ends up with a budget surplus. Bill Clinton proved it! Plumber Joe was a lie from start to finish! Oh and ALEX H – you’re a racist moron.

Posted by: dan | October 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

“Oprah”
Most people these days have learned to cover their racism better than that. You seem to be one of the few who are still proud of it.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

There’s a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth over this ACORN nonsense. Look, it’s politics and life isn’t fair and you don’t always get your way. Even Al Gore figured that out in the end. Maybe go buy him a beer and comiserate.

Posted by: MIguy | October 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Mr Big O is not an megicion and certainly not an econimist. Or else he can’t add or subtract period.., Asking 5% of the people to pay all the tax is rediculous . “JUST WORDS” “JUST WORDS” because we haven’t seen his deeds. 5% paying the tax when he wants to add another Trillion in taxes on top of the ONE TRILLION AND A HALF. that the Gov. wants the people to pay. Must be a bounch of GOOF BALLS on CAPITAL and the DEMO c RATS have lead that for the past two years. WHAT DID THEY DO. Just EAT AWAY OUR CONSTITUION “rats

Posted by: Les Bergman | October 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Natasha
Let’s follow this logic: Obama has huge rallies. Marxists have been known to have huge rallies. Therefore, Obama is a Marxist.
Um, I think you missed a couple steps there. Maybe you should take that logic class over again.
Posted by: jock59801
————————————
Perhaps you should read all the comments posted about Barack Obama being a Marxist and not just the one that is a specific reply to a bloggers comment.
You just proved to be another blind sheep “adoring” the Marxist “Messiah Obama”.
As I said – the October Revolution happened because they were LOTS OF MORONS ADORING COMMUNIST SAVIORS OF THE POOR!
If you want a communist regime move to Cuba or North Korea.

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

33% of the American population does not pay taxes. So…it doesn’t take Einstein to figure it out. All those checks or credits that he says he can give out to 95% then what the hell is it but welfare to people who don’t earn it?

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Obama the magic negro is going to prison.
I’m Tony Rezko and I approve this message

Posted by: Rezko | October 18, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Did you even bother to read the intro article? Please, take a look again – Obama is offering a rebate on payroll taxes. It’s for people who are working, get it?

Posted by: MIguy | October 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Rezko – get off this board – we don’t have time for your crap.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

don’t know what’s more scary, the cover up by the MSM for Obama, or his brainwashed Nazi Youth supporters like Bethb, who typically respond to any questioning of their Messiah with an angry barrage of hate filled insults.
Guess what Obots, your candidate was never vetted at all and has run the most corrupt campaign in history.
Better get used to people like Natasha, and millions of others who will only make sure to find out about Obama especially if he does steal the Presidency.
get used to it. He will never escape the upcoming scrutiny.

Posted by: kay | October 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

– If you want a communist regime move to Cuba or North Korea. –
Or they can move in with you Natasha.. where in Russia do you live again?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

No one on this blog EVER got a job from a poor man! The ones who can afford companies hire and pay those they hire. Bankrupt them or tax them into closing their doors and there will no jobs and no taxes paid for any program.
What would you call giving someone money they never paid? Certainly not a “cut.” Even rebate assume the return of something. Obama isn’t refunding payroll with federal money. So it can only be welfare.
When the jobs are gone and less tax is collected, that $500 that Obama offers won’t go far! Better jobs from growing businesses would pay weekly not a one time $500.

Posted by: Bill | October 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Just goes to prove, you can take the boy out of the Ghetto but you can’t take the Ghetto out of the boy. Barry is a Fraud and always has been a FRAUD!!! America is finally waking up to this fact. Thank God!!!!!

Posted by: barb | October 18, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

MIguy – and 35% of those working folks don’t have a tax liability, but they still would get a check for the credits. Get it?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Hey folks, in sociology we call those taxs cuts and government subsidies that benefit corporations and the wealthy- “Wealthfare.” Thought you might like to know. It’s a concept we have been familiar with for a long time in the social sciences. So if you want those type of policies to continue instead of supporting benefits for the largest social economic group in the U.S. (middle class) I guess you know then who’s your candidate. Fel free to use the phrase – it’s quite fitting. No more WEALTHFARE!

Posted by: supersociologist | October 18, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Americans never get tax relief under the Republicans? What were all those $600 rebate checks we were getting during the past year, imaginary money?

Posted by: bb | October 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I think the St Louis rally is reminscent of all the people that turned out for Adolf Hilter. It’s heartbreaking to see America go down the tubes with this so-called “leader.”

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I’m a typical lazy a$$ black on welfare, and my man Obama is going to give me more free money, like slave reparations from you white folk!

Posted by: bobo | October 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Turns out Joe the plumber doesn’t have a plumbers license.
Turns out Joe isn’t even his real name…its Samuel.
Turns out Joe isnt rich like McSame said “Congratulations Joe Your Rich”
Joe only makes $40,000.00 a year. and would benefit under Obama.
Turns out Joes boss isn’t considering selling the business.
Turns out Joe bosses business only makes $100,000.00 a year…so would benefit under Obamas plan.
Turns out Joe doesn’t pay his income tax and has a lien filed agaisnt his house by the Lucas county Ohio courts.
Turns out Joe has recently lived in two other states…Alaska and Arizona.
Turns out Joe is just a repub / thug neocon nazi fascist racist plant….who would of thunk it….hahahaha
Gary Gelormino Seven Hills Ohio 44131 (216)447-0081

Posted by: Gary Gelormino | October 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

America is hungry for decent leadership. That’s why 100,000 people show up in Missouri. I’m voting my Christian values and principles. I’m voting Obama. John McCain showed he doesn’t really care about Americans when he put a vindictive, arrogant, and yes, dumb person like Palin on the ticket.

Posted by: M Donaldson from Texas | October 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

That’s exactly what I thought. As “ASMcClane” indicated in his comments, some hard-core republican nut who can’t even read properly what Obama has said about the tax-cuts and who still believes that trickle-down selfish and self-centered economics of Bushies (I and II) have taken over this comments section.
Guys (to my republican nuts), you need a basic knowledge of analytics and mathematics to understand Obama’s Financial and Tax Policy. Go get a simple calculator and trying doing simple maths for calculating taxes for folks making < 45K, <100K, 250K under both Obama and McCain plans. You would find that well over 95% of the people would pay way less in federal taxes than he or she pays now. Also, this idea that when you increase the capital gains tax or increase income tax for the upper income earners/corporations, businesses will move abroad is bull.
Finally, Obama has a solid team of Economic and Finance experts as part of his dream team (Summers, Rubin, Stieglitz, Laura Tyson, Volcker, etc.). McCain has some nuts as his economic advisers who can’t even bring out a coherent message on behalf of their candidate. So, you republican nuts (generally, I believe republicans’ IQ is less than what it should be for a normal adult), you can figure it out; which candidate can bring this country’s economy from doldrums it is currently in.

Posted by: Nash_NJ | October 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

RIGHT WING IDIOTS AMERICA IS VOTING FOR CHANGE ,THIS TIME SCARE TACTICS WILL NOT WORK MY MIDDLE NAME IS HUSSAIN TOO AND MY FAMILY SERVED IN ARMED FORCES OF THIS COUNTRY HONORABLY , IF ANY ONE OF YOU SUGGESTING THAT IF SOMEONES MIDDLE NAME IS HUSSAIN OR HE IS MUSLIM IS LESS PATRIOTIC ..SHAME ON YOU. BUT THERE IS A GOOD NEWS ALOT OF PEOPLES DOESNT THINK THAT WAY AND THATS THE GREATNESS OF THIS LAND ……….LONG LIVE USA…

Posted by: pain | October 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

– Guess what Obots, your candidate was never vetted at all and has run the most corrupt campaign in history. –
Really? The why are former GOP supporters and allies starting to distance themselves from McCain and his campaign based on fear and ignorance? Even long time supporter Gov. Crist, who help McCain win the primaries is not campaigning for him.. Time Magazine recently said this about McCains campaign:
McCain’s lies have ranged from the annoying to the sleazy, and the problem is in both degree and kind. His campaign has been a ceaseless assault on his opponent’s character and policies, featuring a consistent—and witting—disdain for the truth. Even after 38 million Americans heard Obama say in his speech at the Democratic National Convention that he was open to offshore oil-drilling and building new nuclear-power plants, McCain flatly said in his acceptance speech that Obama opposed both. Normal political practice would be for McCain to say, “Obama says he’s ‘open to’ offshore drilling, but he’s always opposed it. How can we believe him?” This persistence in repeating demonstrably false charges is something new in presidential politics.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1842030,00.html

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

jock59801-
Are you giving your money to the wealthy? I’m not.
Do you have a retirement plan? Pension? IRA? Do you buy goods? A car? Who do you think is paying the corporate tax? Have you gotten a job from anyone or any company that pays no tax? Do you know that the US corporate tax rate is the second highest in the industrial world? Wouldn’t you (if you ran the company) move your operations overseas if that allowed you to make a competitive product you couldn’t otherwise? Would you move your operations back to the US if the tax rate was lower and that allowed you to be competitive? Sure you would. Look at how many US jobs you would then provide.
Look at how well the Windfall Profits Tax worked last time. Gasoline prices went up and production fell. Yeah, let’s do that again!

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

What happened under Bush and the Republicans?
Nationalized Banks
Record deficit
Biggest government expansion ever.
15 billion $ a month welfare program to Iraqis while our Americans starved.
Bush tells you how to spend your money, can’t gamble online but its ok to play powerball.
Families have no rights, government will make decision for you (terry schivo case)
plus, he’s reading your email and tapping your phone conversations without your knowledge.
many, many more……..
Bush is no conservative, republicans should be ashamed.

Posted by: Ben | October 18, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Janet Hughes
Everyone who works, pays taxes.
The rebates go only to people who work.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

ryang: “Obama’s world green is purple and orange is brown – he thinks you can spin your way out of any fact.”
Love it!! What a world class description of Obama speak! LOL LOL

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Typical GOP and McCain are opposed to Obama cutting taxes for the middle class. Obama`s tax cut goes to workers making less than $250,000.
Now spin this.

Posted by: krista | October 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Obama will let our current tax cuts expire. Everyone earning $20,000 or more got a cut under those cuts from that “terrible” Bush.
Tell me you won’t see a tax increase under Obama when the current cuts expires. You can be assured of it. Clinton promised cuts in 1992 that never came. And Obama’s rebates won’t offset the loss of current tax cuts.

Posted by: bonnie | October 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Natasha
Obama is a United States Senator. He has all the security clearance he needs, thank you very much. And he will have even more after we elect him President.
Apparently many millions of Americans have a different assessment of Obama than you do. Isn’t democracy great?
Posted by: jock59801
—————————————
Ahahahahaha!
You are as NAIVE as That One, if you think that ALL US Senators have TS Clearance to the level required to work for “highly sensitive positions” at the NSA, CIA, DEA, etc.
Did you by any chance miss the former FBI Agent’s interview the other night on Greta Van Susteren’s show? I would rather listen to a former FBI or DEA officer than to Marxist Obama’s herd of sheep.

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Nash_NJ says:
Finally, Obama has a solid team of Economic and Finance experts as part of his dream team (Summers, Rubin, Stieglitz, Laura Tyson, Volcker, etc.).
HE HAS BUFFET WHO IS BUYING UP ALL THE AMERICAN STOCK WHILE WE THE POOR SUCKERS HAVE TO BAIL OUT PEOPLE LIKE HIM. GET REAL YOU MORON. GREEDY, EGOMANICAL PEOPLE ARE ALL OBAMA WORKS WITH THEN WHEN THE TRUTH COMES OUT OOPS HE MOVES ON. DROPPED REV WRIGHT, REZKO, AYERS, RAINES ETC ETC ETC..
A PATTERN HUH?????

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

MIguy – at least 40% of people that registered with Acorn registered as REPUBLICANS!

Posted by: dan | October 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

– Do you know that the US corporate tax rate is the second highest in the industrial world? –
And yet corporations in the US pay the least towards federal taxes than any other country in the world. Funny how those loopholes work, isn’t it!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

BULLCRAP TO DAN. YEAH AND I’M MINNIE MOUSE AND I’M VOTING IN OHIO.

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

McCAIN wants to follow the BUSH Policy to privatize Social Security. Can you imagine what it would be like if Social Security was invested in Wall Street, which is what McCAIN says he will do.
WOW! This is beyond stupid! And it is not CONSERVATIVE. BUSH is the most fiscally irresponsible president in recent history and now McCAIN wants to follow in his foot steps.

Posted by: Indevoter | October 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Funny how the bloggers who are so upset with Obama increasing the taxes on people making more than $250,000 all got a stimulus check this year.
You are the same ones getting a tax break from Obamas plan

Posted by: watching | October 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

– You are as NAIVE as That One, if you think that ALL US Senators have TS Clearance to the level required to work for “highly sensitive positions” at the NSA, CIA, DEA, etc. –
Nope, not all.. but those who sit on the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee do :)
Wouldn’t want an ‘insecure’ person knowing all about our security now, would we?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Janet Hughes – why do I get the feeling that you think you are the only one on the planet that works for a living and everyone else in your office is lazy. I’ll bet you vote down every school levy in your district. Actually Janet, I wonder if you even have a job and are you living off your husbands work.

Posted by: Annette | October 18, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Obama Couldn’t Be Cleared
10.17.08
By George H. Wittman
The lowest-ranking enlisted persons in the Armed Forces of the United States who are expected to handle sensitive matters in the scores of jobs involving classified equipment or written material must be investigated before obtaining their security clearance. Could Barack Obama gain such a clearance?
To begin, the clearance applicant would have to complete a detailed personal history form that includes, if necessary, government access to all health and education files. This is the starting point of all security investigations. Top Secret clearance involves a field investigation rather than the Secret version that is usually limited to a “name check” that is a basic police and public information file review. For the TS clearance an investigator will visit the home neighborhoods and work place sites of the applicant in search of supportive and/or derogatory references.
If the clearance is extended further into the handling of information of such importance that it requires a compartmented distribution, the field and document investigation is pursued with considerable vigor over a lengthy period of time. Nuclear and other sensitive technical or political matters fall into this category.
In all cases, whether on the lower level or up to the most sensitive intelligence, the background of the applicant’s personal and business involvement forms the nucleus of the initial phase of the investigation. The people with whom the applicant associates lead the investigator to personal connections and matters relative to the individual’s character, beliefs and past acts appropriate to matters of security.
Eligibility for clearance at all levels is directly influenced by the people with whom one associates. Yes, who your friends are and have been does count — a great deal. This is true, of course, in many types of police investigations where suspicion is adequate reason for further inquiry. In matters of security clearance, past associations often can mean the end of the process rather than just the beginning.
Considering Barack Obama as a candidate for a top secret security clearance status with a full array of compartmented clearances, one has to be cognizant of the fact that there is considerable evidence of associations and even assistance from individuals with past criminal records or who have expressed anti-American beliefs. Obviously admitted domestic terrorists William Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, as well as recently convicted felon, Antoin “Tony” Rezko, fall into this category.
There is no possibility that a Top Secret clearance would be awarded to a member of the Armed Forces whose background included such associations. An intelligence service clearance for the handling of highly classified material would be totally out of the question.
IF THERE IS SOME hesitancy to accept that Barack Obama’s associations would have precluded his obtaining a TS clearance with compartmented information access, it should be realized he would have had to pass both a polygraph test and a personal psychological evaluation. What are the chances of his being willing to take these tests, to say nothing of his passing, in light of his refusal even to make his educational records available?
It may be deemed unfair, but a child of an American mother and a foreign-born non-U.S. citizen father always receives additional scrutiny. So does the fact that questions have arisen concerning the source of funding for Obama’s law school education. According to a well-researched article by Kenneth Timmerman (Newsmax), Obama was assisted financially by Khalid al-Mansour through the latter’s rich Saudi contacts. Mansour has been referred to as a “Black Nationalist and a Black Muslim” who was a mentor to the founders of the radical Black Panther Party of the 1960s.
All of these matters would have arisen in a normal security clearance. The harsh truth is that the United States is willing to accept presidential candidates like Barack H. Obama who could never gain a Top Secret clearance if he was simply a U.S. Army enlisted man. And yet Obama wants to be Commander-in-Chief. Something is wrong here!
The American Spectator
http://www.spectator.org/archives/2008/10/17/obama-couldnt-be-cleared

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

jock59801 – perhaps you should go take a look at the tax tables. Not all working Americans pay income taxes once they take into account their deductions, earned income credits, etc. But they would still qualify for the credits under Obama’s plan even if they didn’t have a tax liability when they filed.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

More of the same coming from the PALIN/McCAIN LIE MACHINE.
The Republican side is getting really scary… just read the Post’s coverage of Palin’s rally in Florida (Dana Milbank’s column) for proof. Why are so many Americans so stupid, so sheep-like that they believe being a brave POW is a qualification for President? Why can’t they see that Palin is Bush with a pretty facade (and probably worse)?
I have nothing against what I call “old-style conservatives” (what Republicans used to be, pre-neo-con), I even agree with a few (very few) of their policies, but the neo-fascists are truly frightening. If the United States chooses these people and – even worse – if Ms. Palin becomes President, the country is lost.

Posted by: McCAIN Mutiny | October 18, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“Typical GOP and McCain are opposed to Obama cutting taxes for the middle class. Obama`s tax cut goes to workers making less than $250,000. Now spin this.”
SPIN SPIN SPIN… I, Obama, will help everyone who is in need!! I will cut taxes for everyone except the rich scumbags, make sure you have healthcare paid for by your employer – I’m sure they won’t mind, and save you from hunger. I will make the weak strong, give the hopeless hope, and make it rain on Mondays if you like!! I can do everything that no one else could do!! Everything I say is true and everyone else is wrong wrong wrong! They’re just distracting you! They’re desperate! None of what you have read about me is true – none of it! SPIN SPIN SPIN

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

All the republicans here in the blog must be either very rich or very stupid. I do not make $250,000 a year. I can afford to live comfortably with my income that is about 1/4 of 250,000. If anyone says that a person earning $250,000 or more cannot afford to pay taxes they must definitely be out of their minds. I am not a saint but I would never oppose anyone who has a program to help the weak, sick and poor. Remember, not everyone is poor because they are lazy. Some are just unfortunate. Have some empathy towards the helpless!

Posted by: Jason | October 18, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi marking the anniversary of the U.S. air raid on Libya. The address aired on Al-Jazeera TV on June 11, 2008:
“Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qadhafi: Obama Suffers Inferiority Complex That Might Make Him Behave “Whiter Than the White.” He Should Be Proud of His African, Muslim Identity. Ben-Gurion Gave the Green Light for the Killing of JFK ….”
TEXT (Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008)
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/1791.htm
VIDEO – Qadhafi: Obama is a Muslim – Qadhafi’s Public Address – June 11, 2008
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/gaddafi-obama-is-a-muslim/2563816338/?icid=VIDURVNWS07

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

ARE YOU INSANE MCCAIN MUTINY?
WHAT PRAY TELL QUALIFIES OBAMA? HIS PERSONAL CONTACT REFERENCES ON HIS RESUME? OH SORRY I FORGOT, HIS ASSOCIATIONS THAT HE LONGER HAS!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Funny how the bloggers who are so upset with Obama increasing the taxes on people making more than $250,000 all got a stimulus check this year.
You are the same ones getting a tax break from Obamas plan

Posted by: watching | October 18, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Natasha
It is interesting that you think everyone who disagrees with you is naive or moronic. I guess that helps you feel all superior, and prevents you from ever having to question your OWN views.
You can listen to all of the FBI agents you want. I will listen to the American people as we give Obama the highest security clearance as President of the United States.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Posted by: dan | October 18, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

jock59801-
How do you figure everyone who works pays taxes? Income taxes? Sorry, that is not true. Or are you adding in PAYROLL taxes? If so, you will be getting SS/MC benefits later because of those taxes. Not only that, the EMPLOYER is matching the withheld amount and sending it to the government.
I prepare many returns for people who work and pay NO income taxes. In fact, they receive money back that they never even paid in due to the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Guess where they got that money from. You and me.

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Natasha
And when did Qadhafi’s words become TRUTH? I seem to have missed that apotheosis.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Jason your ignorance is very troubling. Are you not familiar with Obama and his record or lack thereof. He will not lower or give taxes to you or me if we are working. We are now going to carry this country just like all Socialist countries till they buckle. We will only send out welfare checks to the very poor and tax everyone else. Pls. look up his record and his rhetoric of past.

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I would like to know what others feel about the fact that Sarah Palin is a member of the Alaskan Independence Party this to me is VERY TROUBLING that group she is as of 2008 a member of is a ANTI AMERICAN GROUP that wonts nothing to With the Great USA and how we do things. Why is she running for VP. Would this be an ISSUE for Homeland Security???

Posted by: rose | October 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Bush tax cut was ipemented in 2002/2001 runs out in 2011; increased the deficit thats why Mccain was a’always’ against it till his campaign. Triclke down did not work, deficit gets higher and higher. Bush tax cut still will run till 2011 even when Obama becomes president. at least Obama is honest that fixing the deficit not a priority when econmy in crisis. McCain wants to cut spending, since billions will be gone even after 2011, only way is to cut social programs where biggest expenditure is from federal budget- health and education. But unrealisic he can balance budget in 4 years and unresposible to cut spending when economy in crisis.

Posted by: adv | October 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Jason – wrong – neither rich (well below the $250k) nor stupid. But I do hold three majors in Accounting, Finance and Business Management and a minor in Economics (earned as an adult with three kids) and understand causes and effects. We have gone through some tough times, but we made it without whining or asking for anything. I also gladly give to causes of my choosing that benefit those who are in need.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

CPA
Yes, I was talking about all taxes.
All taxes are, in fact, TAXES, are they not?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IDEAOLOGY HAS BEEN THE “TRICKLE DOWN EFFECTS”!!!!
YEA!!! REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT JUST TRICKLE DOWN $700 BILLION DOLLARS ON THE AMERCIAN PEOPLE!!!
THERE IS NO MIDDLE CLASS!!!
JUST THE POOR AND THE RICH!!!!
THERE HAVE BEEN OVER 700,000 JOBS LOST THIS YEAR DUE TO BUSH, REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT!!!!
AND MORE TO COME!!!!
THE GREAT DEPRESSION IS HERE!!!!!
NOW, THERE ARE THOSE REPUBLICANS THAT ARE TOTAL AGAINST HELPING THE POOR SINCE THEY ARE ALREADY POOR!!!!!
LET ME REPEAT!!! NO MORE MIDDLE CLASS!!!
THE REPUBLICAN GOV’T MADE YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE POOR!!!!
KEEP SUPPORTING THE RICH AND THAT STUPID IDEAOLOGY, “TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT”, HOPING THAT SOME HOW YOU WILL BECOME RICH!!!!
REPUBLICAN PARTY = DUMB LEADING THE DUMB!!
LOL!!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Obama’s tax plan is socialistic and communistic! Plain and simple. This type of tax plan stifles creativity and productivity. I have been making $350000 a year for the last several years, but next year I am simply not going to work so hard, make less and have more free time. Why bother if we are going to become a socialistic nation!

Posted by: Charlie | October 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

The Obama “Welfare State” will scare any voter away that works for a living; it will draw the “freeloaders” who want others to support them. Conclusion: Obama loses on Nov 4th — he can’t hide the biggest slipup he made in the camapign about redistributing the wealth to a hard working guy now known as “Joe the Plummer”

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Where are the McCain fascist,kkk’s and bigots thank God you donkeys are in the minority and very soon you will all be extinct (good riddance). real Americans are not racist, real americans are decent and will disagree with you base on issues and not the lottery of color.
You Dumb idiots will still lose the election no matter how many racist chants and epithet your peanut sized brain is able to mutter!!

Posted by: chad22 | October 18, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

McCain wants to tax our health care benefits for the first time in history. I like my employer health care plan (which incidentally costs more than $5,000 but does not include “hair transplants”) and I would hate to lose it. The Chamber of Commerce estimated this new tax would cause 20 million people to lose their employer based health care. Sounds like a great plan…

Posted by: Sean | October 18, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

PALIN IS ANTI WOMEN. PALIN IS ANTI AMERICA SEEKING ALASKA SECESSION FROM THE US! PALIN IS ANTI- ENVIRONMENT ! PALIN IS ANTI-WILD LIFE! PALIN IS POWER ABUSER IN ALASKA, YET DURING DEBATE PALIN ASKED FOR MORE POWER FOR A VP! PALIN´S FOREIGN AFFAIRS EXPERIECE= I CAN SEE RUSSIA FROM MY KITCHEN! AND MCCAIN? WEAK IN FOREIGN POLICY AND ZERO IN ECONOMY ! YET ERRATIC HANDLING!!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

– How do you figure everyone who works pays taxes? Income taxes? Sorry, that is not true –
Everyone who works pays federal income taxes, unless your taxable income falls below $5.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

– You are as NAIVE as That One, if you think that ALL US Senators have TS Clearance to the level required to work for “highly sensitive positions” at the NSA, CIA, DEA, etc. –
Nope, not all.. but those who sit on the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committee do :)
Wouldn’t want an ‘insecure’ person knowing all about our security now, would we?
Posted by: Concerned American
———————————–
You are still NAIVE to the degree that you think that after the fiasco of 9/11 many of those Senators would not still have access to “top secret” unless they submitt to renewed TS clearance checks”…
Apparently you have not seem the new FBI protocols which are went into effect October 1, 2008!

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

jason: “If anyone says that a person earning $250,000 or more cannot afford to pay taxes they must definitely be out of their minds. I am not a saint but I would never oppose anyone who has a program to help the weak, sick and poor. Remember, not everyone is poor because they are lazy. Some are just unfortunate. Have some empathy towards the helpless!”
I agree with you, Jason. And there are many, many programs to help the weak, sick, and poor. I agree that not every poor person is lazy.
The thing is this: Obama is not recommending ‘programs’. He is recommending TAKING money by force from some people and giving it to others, as he thinks it should be spent. That is a very big difference between the philosophy you spoke about, and his plan. Obama himself never gave more than 5% of his adjusted gross income to charity from the years 2001-2005, as compared with the McCains who gave in range of 19%-27% over those years. Sometimes actions tell alot about a person, and I have learned in my lifetime to pay attention to actions, not just words.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

they were calling Obama a Marxist on the McGlauflin Report last night, even close associates of Obama say he is a Marxist..He will be defeated, he will not get the chance to destroy America

Posted by: common sense | October 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Obama has been called a Socialist, a Marxist, Muslim and…..
I am going to call him something else..a child of God. Natasha I am just waiting for your comment to this. Do you know how Obama is able to remain his composure, read this Psalms 27: 1-3.

Posted by: Dot | October 18, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

I’m so sick of the Obamites using color, frigging color of one’s skin. Who the hell cares if he’s pink, blue or green with yellow spots. I DON’T FRIGGING CARE. It’s his socialist methodologies and policies. STOP USING THE FRIGGIN RACE CARD, I’M SICK OF IT!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Charlie
Why would you have no incentive to work just because you would make $336,000 rather than $350,000? I don’t get it.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Everyone reading this site who still supports Obama needs to catch up and fast. Please go to GretaWire, No Quarter, Fox News, Texas Darlin, Savage Politics, National Review Online, American Thinker for news which you are being sheltered from. The mainstream media is way behind and is only starting to report things which those of us have researched have known for a year. You are being conned by the mainstream media and Obama. This is not a loony conspiracy theory. Please for the sake of our country’s future you need to find the facts out for yourself. Please don’t trust what you are being told on ABC New, CNN, CBS or MSNBC until you’ve verified it for yourself. Our way of life is at risk here folks!

Posted by: SaveAmerica | October 18, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

This whole tax issue is another McCAIN smoke-n-mirrors political stunt.
Obama’s economic plan hasn’t changed since he posted it on his website many months ago.
McCAIN’s plan changes daily with the polls.
If Obama’s plan was bad it was bad from the beggining. And why didn’t McCAIN jump on it then? Because McCAIN doesn’t know enough to have an opinion.
McCAIN’s economic plan is Bush’s plan. So how has that worked so far.
McCAIN’s housing buyout proposal is Hillary Clinton’s proposal, by McCAIN’s admission. And the plan is SOCIALIST.
Most independent economists think both McCAIN and Obama’s plans have holes, but these same economists favor Obama’s plan. This includes a great many conservatives.
McCAIN by his own admission understands nothing about economics. Google McCAIN economics and you will probably get dozens of footage with him stating just that.
At the same time that McCAIN was saying “the fundamentals of the economy are strong”, Obama was warning of the impending problems and low and behold the bailout.

Posted by: Indevoter | October 18, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

JOHN McBUSH / PALIN-POWER-ABUSER TICKET IS THE BIGGEST JOKE IN AMERICAN HISTORY ! I ´M INDEPENDENT AND GONNA VOTE THE BRIGHT TICKET. OBAMA / BIDEN Nov. 4 !!!!!

Posted by: JUNIOR | October 18, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

– The thing is this: Obama is not recommending ‘programs’. He is recommending TAKING money by force from some people and giving it to others –
Government already takes money bo ‘force’.. it’s called taxes. And those taxes are used to pay for government spending. Pretty simple concept.
Just like your checking account, the less you put in, the less you can spend. If you want to increase spending, like on unprovoked attacks on foreign countries that costs $10 billion a month, you need to put more money into the account.
Is you checking account overdrawn as well?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

common sense
Pat Buchanan was calling Obama a Marxist. I’m not exactly sure what “they” he presents, but it sure ain’t me. The xenophobic theocrat party I guess.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

How will the inside of the White House look and who will “President-elect Obama” bring into the Executive Office? What is the story that his Master’s Thesis has been deleted from the university’s web site? If this is true, the deletions might give a clue. Can ABC get a copy and release its contents to the public?

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

No McCAIN/PALIN or as PALIN puts it NO PALIN/McCAIN.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

– You are still NAIVE to the degree that you think that after the fiasco of 9/11 many of those Senators would not still have access to “top secret” unless they submitt to renewed TS clearance checks”… –
Well, Obama is still on the Committee.. what does that do to your tenuous theory?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Everyone who works pays federal income taxes, unless your taxable income falls below $5.
Posted by: Concerned American
————————————-
YOU ARE A LYING OPERATIVE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
HIDE YOUR FACE MARXIST DEMAGOGUE!

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

MCSAME DOES NOT CARE ABOUT TAXES-THE REPULICANS ALWAYS RAISE TAXES BUT IN A DECEITFUL WAY–THEY START WARS THAT COST TAXPAYERS BILLIONS- AND AFTER THEY HAVE BANKRUPTED THE COUNTRY- AND PUT US IN A DEPRESSION- THEY THEN SAY”COUNTRY FIRST” AND START A NEW WAR WITH RUSSIA OR SOME OTHER COUNTRY SO THEY CAN STEAL OUR MONEY AGAIN. THEY GIVE HUGE TAX CUTS TO THE RICH BUT GIVE THE MIDDLE CLASS NOTHING. NOW OUR JOBS ARE GONE AND OUR HOMES ARE IN FORCLOSURE-BUT NOT TO WORRY THE ELITIST RICH-THE HAVE THE BACKING OF BUSCH AND MCSAME. THEY ONLY LIKE WELFARE FOR THE RICH.

Posted by: LOWES4321 | October 18, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

SaveAmerica
And why should we trust the right-wing partisan media more than the “mainstream” media?
I’ll pass, thanks.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Obama is proposing to let the Bush tax cuts expire as the GOP congress passe din 2001. McCain opposed this plan as being fiscally irresponsible and a giveway. obama then proposes additional tax cuts to those under 250K. many of the folks under 250K did nto see anything in 2001.
Somehow that fact that the top 5% have been the only socioeconomic group to have real income gains during the past 8 years, they woudl seem to have benefitted, much like the Corporate Robber Barrons have done, by the $5 TRILLION plus in additional debt and record deficit spending the past 8 years. They shoudl help to retire the debt more quickly than others groups since they received a disproportinate share of the government handouts the past 8 years.

Posted by: scott jeffries | October 18, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

What is the story about Senator Obama’s Master’s Thesis? Reports are out that the university has deleted it from their web site. The deletions might give a clue as to who he will bring to work in the White House if he is elected. Can ABC News get Obama’s Master’s Thesis and report to the public on its findings?

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

1. Occidental College records — Not released
2. Columbia College records — Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper — ‘ not available ‘
4. Harvard College records — Not released
5. Selective Service Registration — Not released
6. Medical records — Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule — ‘ not available ‘
8. Law practice client list — Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate — Not released
10. Embossed, signed, paper Certification of Live Birth — Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published — None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
13. Your Record of baptism– Not released or ‘ not available ‘
14. Your Illinois State Senate records– ‘ not available
________________________________
I am voting for McCatn the devil I do Know.
From the Detroit Free Press, reporting on new allegations of ACORN fraud in Michigan:
“He didn’t mention reports that his campaign had given $800,000 to Citizens Services Inc. — an ACORN subsidiary — this year. His campaign said today that the money was paid as part of a get-out-the-vote effort — not voter registration — during the primary season. ACORN’s political action committee has endorsed Obama.”
$800 THOUSAND DOLLARS for get out the vote efforts during the primary season?? Hmmm . . . maybe that’s what paid for all those buses into Iowa during the caucus, all the lawyers and agitators in Texas during the caucus. More than three quarters of a million dollars for gaming the caucuses and fraud? It would be irresponsible NOT to speculate.

Posted by: HP Boston | October 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

A child of God. Well I don’t know too many “children of God” who allow babies born alive from blotched abortions to die in a dirty linen closet at The Christ hospital in Chicago. Obama’s record on abortion is horrific and Planned Parenthood who run this country even stepped back from this.
Obama should be called Abomination and time unfortunately will prove us right!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

100,000 in St. Louis!
let’s see McSame and Caribou Barbie draw that kind of crowd!

Posted by: Gus | October 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Concerned Citizen-
So you think just because you work means your taxable income can’t be zero? Do you even know what the Earned Income Tax Credit is? Do you know that the EIC is a refundable credit? That means that you will get money back you never even put in.
I have a tax return in my hand right now for a person who WORKED and made $9600 but paid NO income tax but still received a check for $3,770. If you want more examples, I have plenty.
So don’t try and say that “if you work you pay taxes”. Just isn’t so.

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

TheLastVoter
Yes, when I want a clue to someone’s thinking, I always go first to things they wrote 25 years ago. LOL
I’d hate to even admit to some of the stuff I wrote in college.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

CPA
I don’t know the details, but I still don’t understand why you think it is so bad to help people who work but still can’t get ahead.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Man, the guy can lie, I’ll give him that.

Posted by: Obama is a comin for your money | October 18, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

– maybe that’s what paid for all those buses into Iowa during the caucus, –
You mean like what the GOP did in 2000 and 2004? Funny how it’s ok when the GOP does it but somehow implicates wrongdoing when the Democrats do the same thing. What’s good for the goose and all that..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Janet Hughes
You know very well Obama did no such thing. Man, you people are really over the limit, sometimes.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Thank you SaveAmerica for your post. The brainless idiots who talk in mantras and slogans instead of offering anything of substance know that already. Journalism is dead, America is dying and the worse is yet to come.
Viva la France!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Senator Obama’s Supporters: You have a young inexperienced candidate who slipped up on the campaign trail and wants to redistribute the wealth. Is there any American who supports the idea of redistributing the wealth that is actually working at least 40 hours per week?

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

– I have a tax return in my hand right now for a person who WORKED and made $9600 but paid NO income tax but still received a check for $3,770. If you want more examples, I have plenty. –
Oh, then he was paid under the table and never had federal income tax withheld from his paycheck??? In most states, that is considered illegal.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

When Republicans get in the White House, the economy tanks, the deficit skyrockets, and the gap between rich and poor widens. George Bush Sr. got bounced out of office because of a massive recession (“It’s the economy, stupid!”). When it comes to mismanaging the economy, Junior George has now exceeded dear ol’ dad by light years. The GOP has always been the party of big business and the wealthy; that’s their number one constituency. If you’re in the middle class or are poor, you’d be voting against your own economic self-interest by voting for McCain. “Actions speak louder than words, but results speak loudest of all”: Just look at what has happened to the economy during the Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. terms of office.

Posted by: Chumley | October 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Obama and his promises (he’s made so many I lost track) are all words. A President can’t MAKE is ideas and plans happen. The Congress and Senate are the decision makers as to whether legislation becomes law. And he will continue to make promises. After all the financing to back his promises comes out of the taxpayers’ pockets – NOT HIS! Sure, promise them anything —they’re picking up the tab.
Do you really think any measley little benefit you might realize is worth all the taxes you will pay to help the less fortunate (and we know who they are on Obama’s list)?

Posted by: Jeremyk | October 18, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

100,000 beat that!! change is coming!!.
Some people are so stupid and psychotic that they will actually vote for John Mccain, against their own economic interest!! These Jerkoffs! voted for George Bush and what did we get in return? A weak america with Iran building a nuclear bomb right in our face – you bozo’s are so stupidly dumb you couldn’t even learn from your dumb mistake! What am I thinking? thats why you are dumb!! vote for Mccain/palin and see if I care. Maybe after we sell alaska back to the russians to repay our debt, maybe you’ll learn.
And like my dad used to say: You can train an animal to do great tricks and things, but with a dumb fool there is absolutely no hope

Posted by: chad22 | October 18, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

What? Are you insane Jock. I can’t your computer can’t deviate to a page that reports the truth about Obama. He voted against the “born alive act” which is to give medical help to a baby expelled from the womb, survived the acid burning but left to die alone. OBAMA VOTED AGAINST THAT ACT!!!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

By the senator McCain’s and his unqualified v.p.’slogic, america is already a socialist country because people are paying taxes, some higher than others. what a twisted logic? And it is strnage that the senator’s camp considers “Joe,” an individual making above a quarter of a million, the common American in tems of income. This is an insult to the intelligence of Americans. I think this time the people are quite determined to make the right decision to make sound judgment on all the issues that affect them: the economy, national security, education, and health. On all these issues the Obama-biden team has demonstrated a far better grasp of the issues.

Posted by: robert james | October 18, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

McCain is so wrong so consistently that it’s frightening. The underpinning of his tax plan is to continue with big tax cuts for the rich and large corporations – the centerpiece of the Bush economic disaster and a plan he condemned in 2001. McCain would continue redistributing the nation’s wealth from low and middle income folk to the super rich. Let’s call it upside down socialism or MORE OF THE SAME GOP SCAM!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 18, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

they were calling Obama a Marxist on the McGlauflin Report last night, even close associates of Obama say he is a Marxist..He will be defeated, he will not get the chance to destroy America
Posted by: common sense
————————————-
Yes, indeed! Marxist Obama will destroy America… We will never allow America to become the land of “New Communist Experiment”. American Union (as in Soviet Unison) our land will never be.
Obama can take his “Ayers & Co. community organizing” experience and go to Russia… to organize some Siberian Gulags!
This presentation is a must watch for the left-wing-liberal media clowns and all “morally sound” American fellows.
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036
AMERICA THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Natasha, you’re still not allowed to post.
Shhh.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

– Is there any American who supports the idea of redistributing the wealth that is actually working at least 40 hours per week? –
Yup! Most are tired of ‘redistributing’ it to the rich and getting nothing in return. Trickle down has never worked, and continuing to try it over and over again expecting different results is not something most intelligent people call a good idea.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

I have been in the Corporate tax field for over 20 years at several large companies. I (and any honest corporate tax professional)can attest that most of these large corporations don’t pay much, if any, federal income tax. Most are operating on NOL’s that have been carried back and carried forward for years. The ones that come close to paying federal income taxes have so many deductions that their tax return is as thick as the Metro NY yellow pages.
State & Local taxes are what businesses pay the most..(sales tax, personal property tax, real estate tax, gross receipts tax, franchise taxes, business licenses and state income taxes).
Obama’s tax plan won’t cause most businesses much pain…state governors have that honor.

Posted by: gsjjs1 | October 18, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

CPA – It is really unfortunate that many Americans don’t understand that our current tax structure allows for persons to earn income but then receive all the money that they did pay in, plus additional credit money beyond that. Under Obama’s plan, these credits will increase and effectively redistribute the wealth in this country.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

McCain’s the one proposing a welfare plan for the richest people in America (Buffet and Gates) have a 7.5% tax rate.
That’s right, McCain’s economic bailout announced on Tuesday would result in Warren Buffet and Bill Gates paying a tax rate of 7.5% while the workers in America pay 25-28% under McCain’s plan.
We can’t afford 4 more years of King George and King John taking our money.

Posted by: Dan | October 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

– He voted against the “born alive act” which is to give medical help to a baby expelled from the womb, survived the acid burning but left to die alone. OBAMA VOTED AGAINST THAT ACT!!! –
Unfortunately, it is the uninformed like you that will be the demise of this great country. That one is even covered on snopes.. get a grip!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

I wish that Gov. SARAH PALIN was running for PRES. She would WIN, WIN, Anyway when you wake up and she is in the WHITEHOUSE we will sing a new SONG. DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW. and it will quickly reduce the price of oil because we will be using NATURAL GAS. Can’t Big O figure that one out. We won’t need the ARABS and they won’t get our MONEY. It will solve the ENERGY CRISIS over night TOO !!!SHE DID IT IN ALASKA.

Posted by: Les Bergman | October 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Hello Viva France — Thanks to America a lot of decent Europeans presently live in freedom. Right now, America is in danger of becoming a socialistic, perhaps Marxist, state. It looks as if France and Europe will no longer be able to depend on America if Senator Obama gets elected, because most of our rich people will have moved to Europe and France to enjoy your fine restaurants. Unfortunately, the ones left behind, including the Middle Class will be working to support our free-loaders. Oh goodness. This won’t happen after all. I just woke up and it is Nov 5th. McCain won!!

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

By senator McCain’s and his unqualified v.p.’slogic, america is already a socialist country because people are paying taxes, some higher than others. what a twisted logic? And it is strnage that the senator’s camp considers “Joe,” an individual making above a quarter of a million, the common American in tems of income. This is an insult to the intelligence of Americans. I think this time the people are quite determined to make the right decision on all the issues that affect them: the economy, national security, education, and health. On all these issues the Obama-Biden team has demonstrated a far better understanding.

Posted by: robert james | October 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Don’t you just love the Obama commercial where he says he used to ‘watch with his grandfather and would wave his little flag?” Barf.
He may have waved a little flag when he was a kid, but it was probably not an American flag. Otherwise, why would he have had such a tough time back in the beginning of the campaign puttting on a flag lapel pin???????????
He still will not mention his father.
Does he know who his father is? Does he know where he is? Why doesn’t he mention him? What dirt is he hiding there? So what if he was born a bastard? That’s the least of Obama’s sins.

Posted by: LibsdeserveLiarBO | October 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

These posts are 90% republican. Doesn’t seem to reflect the size of the crowd in St. Louis, the polls, or what’s going to happen Nov 4. All it shows is how desperate the sinking Republican ship is. The iceberg Republicans ran into was not Obama. It was Bush, the Iraq war, NOT getting Osama Bin Ladin, A broken “Contract for America,” a broken economy, housing foreclosures, a tripling of gas prices, and Katrina. Trying to blog their way out of the mess they made is not going to make a difference. Change is coming…

Posted by: Mario | October 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

I think ABC needs to moderate a lot of these comments. The Republicans spewing bile on here ought to be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by: Kelly | October 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Sarah Palin is a dangerous demagogue who believes the Earth is 4,000 years old.
But that’s a whole other issue.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

jock59801-
I have no problem with helping those who need help. We have the most charitable country in the world. What I do have a problem with is the idea of TAKING it from those who do well. We should be doing all we can to increase productivity in this country so that tax revenues increase and that gives us MORE money for important programs. Taxing those who make the most reduces the incentive to make more and to expand business. Making the pie bigger should be the goal instead of keeping it the same size and slicing it into smaller pieces.

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Kelly – so now the Democrats are for censoring information if it does not agree with their stance? Hmmmmm…….

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I wish that Gov. SARAH PALIN was running for PRES. She would WIN, WIN, Anyway when you wake up and she is in the WHITEHOUSE we will sing a new SONG. DRILL HERE, DRILL NOW. and it will quickly reduce the price of oil because we will be using NATURAL GAS. Can’t Big O figure that one out. We won’t need the ARABS and they won’t get our MONEY. It will solve the ENERGY CRISIS over night TOO !!!SHE DID IT IN ALASKA.
Posted by: Les Bergman | Oct 18, 2008 5:55:26 PM
————-
Cut down on the meds. Alaska oil production is on the decline and two major oil companies have pulled out. If we drilled our hearts out of all coasts and alaska it would amount to about 2-3% of the worlds oil supplies and wouldn’t drop the price of oil a dime.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

McCAIN will say and do anything to realize his life-long ambition of being president. This is a man who said “the fundamantals of our economy are strong” dozens of times before the economy tanked. Now, a $700 Billion to possibly $1 Trillion bailout later, he is starting to talk about the economy. He surrounds himself with people who don’t know much more than he does. At the last debate he was asked who he might chose as Secretary of The Treasury and the first name that came out of his mouth is a man who is supporting Obama. McCAIN is now promising the sun, the moon, and the stars to every American in nearly every catagory. DON’T BELIEVE IT!

Posted by: No On McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

He may have waved a little flag when he was a kid, but it was probably not an American flag. Otherwise, why would he have had such a tough time back in the beginning of the campaign puttting on a flag lapel pin???????????
Posted by: LibsdeserveLiarBO | Oct 18, 2008 5:56:23 PM
Now *that* is a stupid argument to make. I’m actually shocked you would make such a stupid, stupid argument.
Okay, you asked for it.
John McCain did not wear a flag pin during the 2nd or 3rd debate.
So, there you go, moron.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

If I’m making over $250K, I’ll gladly pay more taxes, because I’d be living just fine. I’m not, so it really makes me mad when people who already aren’t paying taxes get an EIC. That should come if you’ve paid in at least that much and the amount credited should be determined based on income. The Democrats help the do-nothings, while the Republicans help the gimme-mores. Both are selfish. Those of us in the middle are screwed either way. I’m tired of waiting for a candidate worth voting for.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | October 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

John McCain’s wife just filed her 2007 income tax return. $4 million plus. What can I say. Need I say anything more why John Mccain is SO OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE MIDDLE CLASS IN AMERICA?

Posted by: Angella | October 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

– Taxing those who make the most reduces the incentive to make more and to expand business. –
That’s the theory.. but it hasn’t panned out over the many years trickle down taxation has been tried. Continue pounding that drum though.. the wealthy continue to get more so, and the poor continue to get more so. That apparently is fine with the ‘fiscal conservatives’.
The top 1% of this country control almost 40% of it’s wealth, and we are second only to Switzerland in wealth inequality.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Neither McCain nor Palin are qualified to deal with the current situation, nor have they done any attempts to surround themselves with people that might be. Paul Volcker (Reagan’s Federal Reserve Chariman) is behind Obama. Chosing McCain/Palin would be collective suicide.

Posted by: McCAIN NO MORE | October 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Neither McCain nor Palin are qualified to deal with the current situation, nor have they done any attempts to surround themselves with people that might be. Paul Volcker (Reagan’s Federal Reserve Chariman) is behind Obama. Chosing McCain/Palin would be collective suicide.

Posted by: McCAIN NO MORE | October 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

We’ll never get osama bin laden if BO is elected. Do you really think BO would go after his own half-brother?

Posted by: Suellen | October 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Conflict of Interest: Senator Obama’s campaign will spend over half a BILLION dollars to try and become elected the next President of the United States. Yes, he believes in redistributing the wealth because the campaign contributions from supporters are being given to the press and media who are “In The Tank For Obama” to promote his candidacy. America’s “Watch Dogs” — the supposed Free Press and Media — are being subsidized by campaign contributions, insuring that this “Left Wing” propoganda machine will end up at year’s end “in the Black”.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
CHECK OUT MICHELLE’S MENU. NONE OF YOU SUCKERS THAT ARE GOING VOTE FOR THESE TWO FRAUDS ARE EVER GONNA BE ABLE TO ORDER THIS!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

It is sad how hateful and uninformed so many of these posters have been. Obama’s plan is sound and designed to help American get back on its feet. It’s just that simple. So many ridiculous smears and nonsense coming from McCain and his supporters! There was a time when Republicans did actually make sense.

Posted by: Wiscon108 | October 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

ALEX H: Your H is for HATEFUL.
Be very afraid of AMERICA becoming great again!
Be very afraid of EQULITY!
BE very afraid of the ugliness of YOUR racism being seen by the world!
Be VERY afraid of Barack’s being the most LOVED POTUS EVER!

Posted by: Independant American Woman | October 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

We’ll never get osama bin laden if BO is elected. Do you really think BO would go after his own half-brother?
Posted by: Suellen
…are you Natasha posting under another name?

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Obama has done the math carefully. McCain is right now promoting Obama’s brilliant plan! From the begining, I have seen McCain doing all kind of things that helps Obama – sometimes I suspect he is deliberately trying to lose for some reason.

Posted by: jonathanw | October 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

HEY REPUBLICANS!!!!
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN BUSH STARTED BORROWING MONEY FROM CHINA!!!!!
DID YOU ASK BUSH & THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NOT TO BORROW MONEY FROM CHINA????
DID YOU RECEIVE THE “TRICKLE DOWN EFFECTS” THAT WAS PROMISE TO YOU AND THE REST OF AMERICA????
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN BUSH ROBBED YOU AND THE REST OF AMERICA OUT OF $700 BILLION DOLLARS AND PLUS MORE!!!
DO ANY OF YOU, REPUBLICANS MAKE OVER $250,000 A YEAR AS A TRUCK DRIVER, TEACHER, PLUMMER, SOLDIER, CARPENTER, CEMENT FINISHER, POLICE OFFICER, NURSE, FIREFIGHTER, IT SPECIALSIT, NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, ASSISTANT MANAGER, ETC.???
THERE’S NO MORE MIDDLE CLASS!!!!
YOU ARE JUST THE WORKING POOR!!!!
JUST ASK MCCAIN!!!
LOL!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Isn’t this redistribution of wealth that got us into the loan crisis?

Posted by: plumbers | October 18, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Cindy McCain made 4M in 2007 and paid 1M in taxes, roughly 26%. Why did she end up paying the same tax on 4M as someone earning approx 78K-165K? McCain paid even less, 20% on 400K income, which is at the level of a payroll-earner of probably 42-100K.
John McCain will definitely spread the wealth around, to people in his tax bracket, while 95% of American workers will sink even lower.
Bush’s tax cuts to the wealthy (who he has always referred to as his base) were poo-pooed by McCain until he decided to run for president again. His policies, which align with Bush, by his own estimate, more than 90% of the time, have helped ruin America.
I am in the tax bracket that will be increased by Barack Obama and I don’t mind. Like Cindy and John McCain, I have write-offs that bring my income down to a lower taxable bracket. However, I just do not see how they are lowering theirs so much, particularly Cindy.

Posted by: serious53 | October 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I found this article from another paper! its well articulated!!
I wonder what life would be like today if McCain were president during the Iranian (oops…Cuban) missile crisis, with all the hawks screaming “Invade now!”, unaware of the island’s tactical nukes. Thankfully, a cool JFK was instead on watch. I do not fault McCain for voting to attack Iraq. Attack is what hawks do. Avoiding war in the first place is a (competent) president’s job, and something that Obama would have done.
I do not fault Obama for voting against the surge. He is not a military man, and would be no more good at advising the nuts and bolts of conflict than a hawk like McCain could in avoiding such conflict in the first place. I expect the executive to keep us out, like Obama would have, not run the ground war.
McCain said in the debates that he would fight in Iraq for the honor of the service persons who have died there, so their deaths are not in vain. He is wrong. There is no way to die in vain in service to America. Military action sends a clear message to anyone wanting to steal America’s freedom to think again, regardless of the overall military success of the conflict.
McCain’s doctrine of no deaths un-avenged is nonsense, otherwise we would reinvade the Korean peninsula and reengage in Indochina. This doctrine of his is a recipe for future, more protracted wars.
McCain also believes only the top 5% can create jobs, and tax cuts to these people will take care of the apparently unwashed 95% of Americans. This is a failed notion. Those 5% at one time were among the 95%. A break for the middle class would engage a huge number of Americans, innovative, creative Americans, not to mention increase consumer spending.
McCain also wants to put us on a collision course with Russia by rushing former satellites into NATO. This is reckless; all things have their moment and now is not the moment to be pushing the Russians further. Our own Secretary of State mentioned this last month, saying we have been ignorant of Russia’s perspective. Hawks, by their nature, always think the time is NOW, just like McCain running off to Washington instead of the debates.
John McCain’s impulsive manor was on full display during the last debate, with the simpleton cure to spending by just freezing and vetoing everything. This is again his narrow-minded focus, devoid of the bigger picture.
Obama, on the other hand, wants measured cuts based upon our morals and needs. A McCain weight loss program would be a feeding freeze; an Obama plan a healthy diet and exercise.
McCain believes we are not fostering a second cold war through our incompetent foreign policy. But then again, this is a man that didn’t even see the train wreck of the economy burning in front of him. Hawks like McCain, seeing only the target immediately in front of them, see only the small picture, usually in cross hairs. That’s what makes a great military man, and we need such magnificent individuals to carry out the will of the executive. But we do not need such individual as the executive.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Natasha, you’re still not allowed to post.
Shhh.
Posted by: Timely?
————————————–
OBAMA MARXSIST PUPPET: THIS IS AMERICA – NOT CUBA – NOT NORTH KOREA – MOT VENEZOUELA – NOT LIBYA!
GO TO ANY OF THOSE COUNTRIES WITH YOUR MARXIST OBAMA – THE MESSIAH OF THE POOR – TO REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH AND SHUT PEOPLE UP.
IN THE MEAN-TIME FO GET YOURSELF A DOG SO YOU CAN FEEL LIKE A MASTER!

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

jock59801 — Believe it or not, most Leopards do not change their spots with age. The behavior of a young adult, as most liberals have already pointed out regarding President Bush, is in fact a clue to one’s potential conduct later in life. And, to be fair, so I am not accused of jumping on a Republican, we also learned that about President Clinton…didn’t we?

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Four years ago there were “Kerry” and “Bush” bumper stickers all over the place. I can count on one hand the number of Obama bumper stickers I’ve seen here in the northeast. I think people are embarrassed to be known as his supporter. Are these people then “closet voters?”
On the other hand McCain bumper stickers are on one out of three vehicles.

Posted by: Mac | October 18, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Angella – Obama made $4.2 million in 2007 and only gave 5% to charity. The McCains gave 17%. Who is out of touch?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

IRANIAN CAVIAR, BOLLINGER CHAMPAGNE AND 4 LOTS OF LOBSTER…HMMN QUITE EXPENSIVE FOR A 4PM SNACK. OH I FORGOT..SHE DIDN’T PAY FOR IT, YOU DID THE MORONS THAT DONATED MONEY!

Posted by: Janet Hughes | October 18, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

The Conservatives are started to sound like they belong in the crazy house with their fear talk and welfare talk. Obama just explained it. Mc Cain is fighting for the wealthy to give them a welfare package that supports them and not the average Joe the plummer. This is good VS evil and Mc Cain is on the bad side with the racist, lobbyists, hate mongerers, big oil companies, liars, Rove tacticians, dividers, deregulators, Bush policies, and taxes slanted to help the rich and give less to the poor and middle class. It is pure and simple good VS evil and Obama is on the good side. At least he went to a christian church for 20 years and never cheated on his wife. Mc Cain is the tax and spend liberal who gives your earnings to the top 10 percent in the world while making you pay higher taxes than Obama’s plan would to 95% of you.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Wiscon108 – Obama’s plan is the same sort of thinking that got us to push out all of those unsecured loans.
McCain said we have to change Fannie Mae and got yelled down as a racist.
FDR, the greatest democrat ever, said one never raises taxes during a recession.
And Obma

Posted by: plumbers | October 18, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

serious53 – and Obama made $4.2 million and paid approximately the same amount in taxes. You do realize that McCain has give all his Senate salary increases to charity, don’t you?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Cindy McCain made 4M in 2007 and paid 1M in taxes, roughly 26%. Why did she end up paying the same tax on 4M as someone earning approx 78K-165K? McCain paid even less, 20% on 400K income, which is at the level of a payroll-earner of probably 42-100K.
John McCain will definitely spread the wealth around, to people in his tax bracket, while 95% of American workers will sink even lower.
Bush’s tax cuts to the wealthy (who he has always referred to as his base) were poo-pooed by McCain until he decided to run for president again. His policies, which align with Bush, by his own estimate, more than 90% of the time, have helped ruin America.
I am in the tax bracket that will be increased by Barack Obama and I don’t mind. Like Cindy and John McCain, I have write-offs that bring my income down to a lower taxable bracket. However, I just do not see how they are lowering theirs so much, particularly Cindy.
Posted by: serious53 | Oct 18, 2008 6:06:32 PM
—————–
That is what the ruling classes believe that they should be exempt from paying their fair share.
Obama is choosing a strategy that guarantees he and Michelle will pay more taxes, but does it for the good of the country.
On the other hand McCAIN chooses a plan that guarantees lower taxes for him and Cindy.
Don’t let McCAIN try to full you into thinking he’s doing this for Joe the Plumber or Steve the Plumber or whatever this guys name is.
McCAIN is doing this to spare his and his cronies from paying their fair share.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Obama doesn’t even understand private business, or how they make money. Also, William Ayers is the true author of “Dreams of my Father.” Just compare it to Ayers’ books, or see Jack Cashill’s web page for the evidence.

Posted by: Colonel Reb | October 18, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

For what it is worth — I can see a movement away from Senator Obama during the past week. His past and redistribution of wealth ideas are finally catching up to his campaign. You can find at least one of his advisors saying, “I wish the election were being held tomorrow”. Sorry, but that’s the way it is, and on Nov. 4th, it won’t even be close. McCain will be elected by 5-plus points, not because of McCain, but because of Senator Obama and a guy called “Joe the Plummer.”

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

THIS IS AMERICA – NOT CUBA – NOT NORTH KOREA – MOT VENEZOUELA – NOT LIBYA!
Posted by: Natasha
Natasha, this is the first sentence you’ve ever written on these boards that is based on fact.
Well done!

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

100,000 people?…what a bunch of crock…I only counted 99,999.

Posted by: caribbeanSnow | October 18, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Barrack Hussein Obama is insane.
Our country is BANKRUPT but he’s going to hand out free money to people who have NO tax liability? How is he planning to fund this and all these socialist programs? By cutting income (taxes)!
Brilliant!!!
A vote for Obama is a vote for moral idiocy. He is BAD news.

Posted by: Rose | October 18, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NOT LEARNED THEIR HISTORY LESSONS…
OBAMA IS A MARXIST WHO WILL USE AMERICA AS THE LAND OF THE “NEW COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”.
Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation
http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/
The Global Museum of Communism
http://www.globalmuseumoncommunism.org/index.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Is there any Senator Obama supporter who is voting for him ONLY because of President Bush?

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Alex H wrote…a long-winded missive of scare and fear. Sport, being that you are so frightened build yourself a Panic Room and hide there with your mindless minions. Americans fear no one, Americans fear nothing especially not the future.

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | October 18, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

To Alex H., your comments are ignorant, racist and i am concerned about your mental state. It amazes me the kind of supporters “nazi” palin can inspire. How wonderful for our great nation. I am a supporter of obama and i do indeed pay taxes and both my husband and I are well-educated individuals, which is more than i can say for you. Now you call obama a drug-addict, the only drug-addict on either ticket is Mrs. McCain, i believe her preference was vicodon which she abused during her husbands keating-5 days. Palin is a wolf in sheeps clothing who only inspires the racist, ignorant crackers as yourself. Mr. McCrabby claims to want to help “americans”, which in republican terms means big business, he can’t even utter the term middle-class who prop up this society. Which one are you Alex H, are you middle class or just the racist class. I believe you would find it easier to live in China or Russia than in America. You sound obsessed with drug abusers, are you one? It sounds like you need help?
McCrabby plans to raise my taxes by taxing my husbands health insurance. NO Thanks. You rant about socialism, I believe mccrabby voted for the 700 billion dollar bailout, which includes the nationalization of the nations banks. I also see he wants to waste money by buying bad mortgages at face value. What a bad idea! He also wants to give everybody 5 grand to buy health insurance and then tax it. He wants to freeze government spending yet buy bad mortgages at face value and then send everyone 5000 dollars and continue spending 10 billion dollars a month in Iraq for the next 5-10 years. What a way to balance a budget moron. Now Mr. Alex H. your racist, ignorant, uninformed rant is perfect for the nazi like atmosphere the mccrabby campaign has fostered the last 2 weeks. They are hoping crackers like you go to the voting machine and vote, but since you are so completely stupid it will amaze me if you figure out how to work the machine.

Posted by: tiffany | October 18, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

How can you not be working if you are paying “Payroll taxes”? U idiots, payroll taxes are taken out of your “pay check”, that’s what you take home. And if I am taking home more that increases my income, and why shouldn’t that benefit be passed on to someone making $30,000 and gets the earned income tax credit and therefore would get a tax refund vs. somebody who is working and makes $100,000 and has a tax debt? We both shop at the same grocery store, buy cars, homes, ect.. seems like with the tax credit it would be just more of us at these places with more to spend. Please get an understanding of Payroll taxes. OBAMA 2008!!

Posted by: SD | October 18, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

I say we tax the hell out of those rich corporations then they can move all of their businesses to oversea and all those who have voted for Obama will stand on the welfare line and wait for his checks. By then I really want to know where he is going to get the tax revenue to pay for all these idiots who supported him if no one works to pay for the income tax revenue. Furthermore, his $900,000,000 spending within 2 years in the senate should be the red light for this country, he is a corrupted socialist 101 and if America is not going to wake up and stop this spending madness the idea of a free market will be destroy by these loonies so call DNC, Dean, Pelosi, Kerry, Reids…and the one and only OBAMA.

Posted by: Happy to be an American | October 18, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

wow, cindy mccain is worth 103 million and she gave a whole 400 k to charity? She also paid almost 1/2 taxes I pay percentage wise. Looks like Bush and McCain gave her 400k back in spades.

Posted by: richard | October 18, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

ABC News has learned that Warren Tompkins, one of the strategists of then-Gov. George W. Bush’s South Carolina campaign in 2000 — which Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., blamed for his family being slimed — is now a part of the McCain-Palin campaign team, albeit in an “unofficial” role.
The news of Tompkins being brought on board the McCain campaign brings to a total of three the number of GOP operatives McCain now is using despite the fact that he once held them responsible for the ugly campaign that contributed to his South Carolina primary defeat, a campaign in which McCain’s wife Cindy was attacked for her past addiction to painkillers, and the McCains’ adopted Bangladeshi daughter Bridget was targeted as his illegitimate black baby.
***************************
WHERE’S THE POPCORN!!!!
I CALL THIS GETTING IN BED WITH YOUR ENEMIES!!!!
DESPERATION!!!!
LOL!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Four years ago there were “Kerry” and “Bush” bumper stickers all over the place. I can count on one hand the number of Obama bumper stickers I’ve seen here in the northeast. I think people are embarrassed to be known as his supporter. Are these people then “closet voters?”
On the other hand McCain bumper stickers are on one out of three vehicles.
Posted by: Mac | Oct 18, 2008 6:09:03 PM
————–
This is very easy to explain. The one demographic that McCAIN leads in is lower educated white males. This is the same catagory of people who put bumper stickers on their cars.
On the other hand Obama is killing McCAIN in lawn signs in most part of the battle ground states and it is reflected in the polls.

Posted by: No ON McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Obama has spent $188 million dollars on t.v. advertising according to today’s New york Times…. why isn’t this news?

Posted by: rafraf | October 18, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Obama is a Socialist Period

Posted by: Ryan | October 18, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Hey Libs!
You talk about the Conservatives being fearful…..Obama must have been pretty concerned himself to hire ACORN to do his dirty work. Granted, he won’t be challenged, because most are so in love with him, but I guarnantee you, if in fact anyone catches a vote from a dead person or a 7 year old, it will turn this election upside down.

Posted by: weijo | October 18, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

No ON McCain – Perhaps you should come on up to a traditional democratic county in MN – there are very few signs on the Presidential election (and those that are here are evenly split) but tons of signs for the local elections.

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

If Obama gets elected many people will say “why bother” trying to make more money for my family if he is just going to steal it and use it to further his own agenda of “redistributing the wealth”. I just can’t believe that Democrats don’t see throught this man. He isn’t a liberal, he is a socialist. He has hoodwinked the democratic party.

Posted by: dlc | October 18, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

…but because of Senator Obama and a guy called “Joe the Plummer.”
Posted by: TheLastVoter | Oct 18, 2008 6:13:44 PM
————–
Do you mean “Joe The Liar” because the guy McCAIN talked about, the guy who owes 1100+ in back taxes, the guy who has never made more than about $40,000, the guy who dozen have an extra dime let alone enough to buy a business with an annual income of $250,000, the guy who will get 3 times the tax break under Obama. This guy isn’t “Joe The Plumber” because: 1) he is not a liscensed plumber; and 2) his name isn’t Joe.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

You Jerkoffs still dont get it!! do you?
Obama’s redistribution of wealth simply means to make sure that the so called middle class can also get real access to wealth – and not being stuck with 2 jobs for their entire lives! .
But just like the mccain/palin you support they dont get it either!!.

Posted by: chad22 | October 18, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Latest Analysis: The shift is away from Senator Obama and the recent revelations are making it difficult for his supporters to wear an “Obama Button” when they are not alongside other Obama supporters. The safety in numbers theory is accurate, as are their supporters on this web site, not known by other readers. It will be interesting to see how many Obama buttons you will see on the street when the supporter is alone. It could be that his supporters don’t want to be identified as a non-working “freeloader” or a supporter of the Senator Obama “Redistribution of the Wealth Plan”. The last thing the Obama Supporter needs is to be tagged by other Americans and strangers on the street as a future “welfare recipient”.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I would doubt the welfare followers of Obama will create jobs. Obama will be their sugar-daddy and the other mentally challanged followers are clueless.
If you want a job, who do you ask, a welfare follower or a business or a company?
Get a job!!!

Posted by: abe | October 18, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

i ran into a friend couple of days a go. his name is paul a very hardcore republican. he told me that there is nothing wrong with our economy, its the media and the democrats who are making it up. he goes on saying that president bush has done nothing wrong. i was laughing. we are on the verge of depression and my innocent friend is saying our economy is fine.
well i backed president bush last time and results are crystal clear. i ain’t dumb enough to vote for the same logic of top bottom approach that senator mccain is proposing. it should be bottom up as obama is proposing. senator mccains policies are similar if not exactly the same to president bush and his mentality about the economy is same. ontop of every thing i am tired of racism/hate among our republican friends. and i happen to be an average guy with an average mentality and i can almost guarantee that there are millions like me who are not going to vote for mccain under the current circumstances.

Posted by: bill TX | October 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

This is a must watch for all patriotic -morally sound American fellows.
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
AMERICA SAY NO TO OBAMA’S “US COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

indevoter – so, because someone dared to ask Obama about his plan he is being crucified by the media and the likes of you? Sounds like he is a struggling American who would like to get ahead just like the rest of us and he was trying to clarify something with Obama’s plan. And since when can someone not go by their middle name rather than their first name?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Bush’s tax cuts enacted in 2002 favored the rich over the middle class and essentially redistributed the wealth to the top 1%. How come the conservative Republicans didn’t object to this spreading the wealth from the poor to the rich. Its called trickle down economics and we have just had 8 years of that policy. And quess what-McCain represents 4 more years of the same economic policies of Bush!!We need a change that helps the middle class NOW!

Posted by: daniel yellon md | October 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Republicans sound like confused frightened children that their candidate is on the verge of a huge loss. Thats what it all boild down to really. Sounds like desperation and desperation calls for desperate acts of lieing and calling the other sides plans UnAmerican or different. Thet truth is the winning side is winning because the plans are just better for the country and more people are realizing they would rather have more money under Obamas plan than give 5% of the population all the breaks and get nothing in return. That is what it all boils down to. They have gotten these same plans under Bush and look an Reccession that is the crux of it plain and simple. You started the Recession with trickle down economics so what makes you think you can end it with the same tactic only more of it at a higher rate? It sounds rediculous right? Enough said then your plans dont work and Obama has a goos plan that resembles one that did work and similar to Bill Clintons. One proved to help in Obama’s plan in history and one in Mc Cains gave us biggest deficit in history since 1929. END OF STORY?

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

No ON McCain – Perhaps you should come on up to a traditional democratic county in MN – there are very few signs on the Presidential election (and those that are here are evenly split) but tons of signs for the local elections.
Posted by: wanttheelectionover | Oct 18, 2008 6:24:49 PM
—————
No Thanks. Maybe in the summer for some fishing. Obviously I haven’t been in every county in the nation, nor have you. Obama will probably win Minnesota, but that’s not one of the nine traditional battleground states I was talking about.

Posted by: No ON McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

ndevoter – you call Joe the Plumber a liar. You are calling him a liar because he is not willing to be bought off by a sleazy tax refund scam? You are calling him a liar becuase he is not going to sell out his principles for a crummy welfare check.
This redistribution of wealth idea is what got us into the loan crisis that has collapsed teh economy.

Posted by: plumbers | October 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

i will stick with the young educated and intelligent guy—–and the lieing old geser cas go to –h

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

No ON McCAIN – Actually we are a toss up state. Most of outstate is solidly Republican, with the Metro counties primarily Democratic. But still, an interesting lack of signs this year. Usually the Presidential signs are all over the place. Sure, come on up for the fishing – but why wait until summer? Ice fishing can be great!

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I’m not convinced that Obama is someone I would want to have as my president. But I just have to say I resent the comments by one idiot commenting here. People in college are not pukes that make no money and flipping hamburgers has to happen by someone.
I work 7 days per week, 24 hours per day. I’ve changed more than 200,000 diapers in my lifetime so others can climb up the corporate America. But you know what? I don’t get raises or make meaningful income. But I have a meaningful job. I can’t send my daughters to school. My daughters are working their way through. When my daughters have a hard time I’m lucky if I can help them with a few dollars, gas money etc. So I’m not totally against these refundable tax credits!
Everyone that spends money in this country pays taxes for everything they buy. We pay so many taxes that the average person is drowning in them.
Grow up and think about someone besides just yourself!

Posted by: Suzi | October 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

JanetHughes: I had never seen Michelle OBama’s $447 meal for 2 dollar meal at the Waldorf. Wow, so they live like kings and act like they’re ‘one of us’?? Isn’t that just a little extravagant – I mean, CAVAIAR?? I don’t know if McCain’s wife dines like this but at least they don’t pretend to be like ‘one of us’. Maybe that’s why the Obama’s never had enough to give more than 5% to charity during the years of 2001 – 2006

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Natasha
Will you explain how you get “communist” out of a plan to return tax rates to the booming capitalist days of the 1990s?

Posted by: jock59801 | October 18, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Here’s a question for all the Republicans out there – how much money in stocks have you lost in the past few weeks? How much have your taxes and insurance payments gone up in the past 8 years? Complain all you want about the Democrats but my family just lost over $60,000 in the stock market, our home owners insurance has TRIPLED (we live in Florida – a Republican state) and our taxes have increased. Under a REPUBLICAN administration, our national debt is so high the debt counter in NYC doesn’t even have enough numbers to list it and our goverment is the biggest it has been in decades. I hear what you are saying about Obama but you need to take a close look at your own party because they aren’t representing you either.

Posted by: allie | October 18, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

the only ones worried about paying more taxes are people like mccain who make 5 million a year—-how many of you out there net over 250 thousand a year—ha ha ha ha -you guys are crazy and argue over nonsense or the mccain lies.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

To Bill TX. You are intelligent enough to know when they are trying to play you like a fool again! George Bush will go down as the worst President of all time. He put us in a preemptive war with Iraq, helped destroy New Orleans, and has lead us to the biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression. McCain is simply 4 more years of the same economic and foreign policies as Bush.Enough is Enough sir.

Posted by: daniel yellon md | October 18, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Trickle down economics is the policy ny Bush if I am not mistaken and what has happened during this time REPUBLICANS? AND what does Mc Cain want to do more of at a higher level HMM???? What do you think will happen to our country already in bancruptcy practicing a policy at a higher level that has already proven to BANCRUPT it? Anyone care to answer this little tidbit? How if it didnt work and you do more of it is it gonna all the sudden reverse? Has it gotten through that little mellon Republicans???

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

I call joe the plumber a liar because he has not paid his taxes. he does not have a license to be a plumber which means not only is he performing services he may not be qualified for but invalidating any homeowners insurance for whatever jobs he does. He is further taking work from licensed plumbers in his area. He lied about buying his bosses business, he lied about how much it would cost to do so and how much it makes. He lied about how much he made. He lied about all of this to try and justify the fact that he had already made up his mind to vote for McCain even though he will be worse off financially for doing so.

Posted by: Danny | October 18, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

indevoter – so, because someone dared to ask Obama about his plan he is being crucified by the media and the likes of you? Sounds like he is a struggling American who would like to get ahead just like the rest of us and he was trying to clarify something with Obama’s plan. And since when can someone not go by their middle name rather than their first name?
Posted by: wanttheelectionover | Oct 18, 2008 6:29:41 PM
—————–
I’m not crucifying “Joe The Plumber”, but if McCAIN is going to use him then he comes worts and all. I’m just glad I didn’t make up some stupid fictitious story about buying a business that’s not for sale and that I couldn’t afford if it were for sale.
My response was when some far-right-wing-nut said that Joe The Plumber was going to win the election for McCAIN.
If McCAIN wins it won’t be because of one “plumber”. In fact, I think most unions (plumbers included) favor Obama.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Acorn is very very bad yet mccain in 2006 addressed them and thanked them for the good work they have done and continue to do. Talk about Judgement!!.
Sarah Palin also thanked the Alaska Independence Party for the good work they are doing.
Sarah Palin may not only be palling with a terrorist but she is actually sleeping with the enemy of america in the person of the first dude!!

Posted by: chad22 | October 18, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

250 billion just went to the wealtyist and you are concerned if some of the poorist get something—–what a bunch of sleezy repubs.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

It is the kind of “me first” mentality evidenced in some of the posts here our country is in a hole today. We pay mere lip service to our country but are never willing to follow through with deeds.

Posted by: worldsam | October 18, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

REPUBLICANS, IN 17 DAYS YOU WILL BE OUT OF TIME!!!!!
LOL!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

I make 60,000 per year. I pay income taxes. I am not rich.
But is isn’t right that the taxes I pay will go to those who pay no income tax. NOTHIHG. I call that socialism. Redribution wealth.
So why work hard? I will find a minimum wage job that will qualify me to receive a check from the IRS instead of sending a check to the IRS.

Posted by: susie | October 18, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

to union people the so called plumber is known as a SCAB

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Wow, the pictures of the rally are absolutely amazing. Every time people see Barack Obama they realize who he really is, and that he bears no resemblance to the villain that the repubs are pretending he is. Every time they listen, they realize that his actual policies are completely reasonable and good for the country, and that the repubs are lying about what Obama has proposed.
http://palincounter.blogspot.com/

Posted by: billthomson | October 18, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

“Obama gets his ideas from Carl Marx. If elected, he would be the first Marxist President of the “American Union” (like in Soviet Union).”…Another proxy for Palin.

Posted by: Jim | October 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

The Michelle Obama story to be updated tomorrow the 19th of October
Posted by africanpress on October 18, 2008
We would like to inform all our readers that update on Michelle Obama story will be released tomorrow.
We have understood the importance that the American people put into electing the right candidate for the Presidency.
It is important that the tapes be released and all can judge for themselves what Mrs Obama meant and why it has come at the near-end of electioneering. The fact that the mainstream American media has been reluctant to reveal what they know about Obama is very unfortunate.
The American mainstream media seems to be interested in excitement and we all know that the only excitement at present is for some to say they witnessed history of some kind – the election of a black man to govern the only powerful nation in the world.
All the readers should exercise patience. We in API promise that you will get to know the truth when the recordings are finally released.
——
Published by Chief Editor/ African Press International – API
http://africanpress.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/the-michelle-obama-story-to-be-updated-tomorrow-the-19th-of-october/

Posted by: Michelle My Girl | October 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

indevoter – But you are trying to justify your smearing of Joe. This man does not deserve it – he is not perfect, but this smear campaign against a private citizen is ridiculous. Joe won’t win it for McCain – Obama’s response to Joe could tip the tide. Although the unions may traditionally support the Democratic ticket, not all members vote that way. Could you answer this question for me? If the Democratic Party is so pro-union, why are they supporting the open vote for unionization?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I suppose we will find out on the 5th of Nov. Either way neither candidate will be out of a job as compared to nearly 800,000 Americans in the last ten months, neither candidate faces losing their home/homes, neither candidate has to worry about paying the bills, neither candidate needs to worry about their health plan, and neither candidate is going to worry about their pension, but the difference is one candidate has a plan, the other is bereft of ideas, the American voters will choose, and life will go on.

Posted by: S.Orram | October 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

You McCainiacs can twist and distort all you like. There were ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE listening to Obama today. ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND IN A RED STATE. McCain and Palin must be shaking in their boots. That is, if their campaign advisors are allowing them to watch the news today (that’s who I want leading the country, people so fragile they can’t watch the news without becoming depressed.
I CAN’T WAIT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA IN TEXAS ON MONDAY–THE FIRST DAY OF EARLY VOTING!!!!!!

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | October 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

jock59801 — You are right about the Republicans. Yes, even President Bush did not use his veto once in about 7 years. But the problem is that Senator Obama will create such a socialistic state, you might as well hand over all of your assets to ACORN and those other people looking for someone like you to support them. Give John McCain and Sara a chance to sweep the Executive Office clean of bums, leeches, and corrupt politicians. Look, Sara did it in Alaska. Don’t give Senator Obama a free hand with a veto-proof House and Senate, which will surely be Democrats. Sorry for your loss. Let McCain start putting those bums into jail and let’s turn “America’s Mayor” loose to do the job. Just think, he might even go after those bums who are registering dead people so Obama can steal this election.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

MICHELLE
QUIT WATCHING FOZ FREAKS AND FRIENDS.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Even if you don’t have an income tax liability (IRS) because your working income is too low, you still have social security and medicare taxes. Everyone who is employed is taxed in some way.

Posted by: George | October 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Your days and numbered Republicans. The Democratic side knows this and indie side. That is why all of these false allegations mean nothing because everyone can see them for what they are. People like a real Joe like me who served in Iraq a GI Joe will call you out on it. This last gasp is desperation to lie,.cheat, and steal an election off of misdeeds and not honor or valor. not even for the sake of other Americans or patriotism. Just FEAR. Because the loss is gonna be eminent so the lies are being spread and the desperate acts of hate at your rallies being displayed. It sounds like the EVIL side to me that you are on if you are a REpublican. The good citizens who believe in unity and prosperity for ALL will be on the GOOD side and that is how we know Obama/ Biden will win. By the way Bidens name happens to be JOE!

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

the problem is our hardcore republican friends(who think that all the other americans are somehow enemies) give importance to their party over our common interests in this country. their attitude is either us or nobody. hate/racism is something they learn through out their lives from childhood to adult hood. get over it. give yourselves a break and for the sake of america lets bring a well educated, nice family man (who cares for us, who wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth, who is calm and tough at the same time, who is smart and balanced at the same time and most importantly who is balanced between majority of people and is more focused in finding the common ground for all of us rather than one sided completely) this time as our president.

Posted by: bill TX | October 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

“Here’s a question for all the Republicans out there – how much money in stocks have you lost in the past few weeks?”
The main reason for the problems we are seeing with the stock market have to do with greed on behalf of CEOS are are split about 50/50 dem/repub. Should there be some sort of oversight, yes, there should be. But dems are right up there in Washington as well, and the last 2 years I didn’t hear a peep let alone warning bells. They also wanted to be the first to rush right in and bail them all out, with few to no provisions. Then they have the audacity to point the finger at the repubs for the whole problem. Anyone with half a brain knows that the Dems share at LEAST 50% of the blame in this. The CEOs were drunk in money. That’s what happened. They proved that some oversight is necessary because they cannot be trusted.
It’s looking more and more like Obama has his own agenda and he’s pretending to be everything to everyone to get his foot in there. He has denied just about every tie to shady people that have been questioned. He has lied. Saul Alinsky influenced him greatly in college. I recently read Alinksy’s philosophy on ‘organizing’. Our country is primed for this type of ‘organizing’. Wiki him and check it out.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

This is a must watch for all patriotic -morally sound American fellows.
A USA Military History (Tchaikovsky 1812 Overture)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6370539579217643597&hl=en
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA!
AMERICA SAY NO TO OBAMA’S… “USA: THE NEW COMMUNIST EXPERIMENT”

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The first socialist from Missouri was Harry S. Truman, a Democrat and like Barack Hussein Obama, Truman had a middle name he never used. The S stood for Saddam if you follow the McCain theory of attack politics.

Posted by: Evando | October 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Haven’t had any non-tax paying customers calling my construction business. People with money spend money and they create jobs–they hire the non tax payers so they too can profit from their own industriousness.

Posted by: Another Joe | October 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

JIM
IS CARL MARX A COUSIN OF GROCHO

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

HEY REPUBLICAN SUPPORTERS OF MCCAIN!!!
SINCE, YOU ARE AGAINST REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH, CAN THE WORKING POOR WHICH IS YOU, HAVE YOUR REDISTRUBUTION OF WEALTH???
LOL!!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

NATASHA–WHERE THE HELL IS BORIS—-YOU BADENOUGHS ARE SOMETHING.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Americans HAD BETTER question WHERE the tax break money is coming from? Oil companies can be taxed to DEATH; it is passed on to consumers in the cost of a gallon of gasoline or a quart of oil. I am not worried—all my money goes to 401K (pre-tax) and long-term (10 year)stocks–Obama cannot touch me unless he remains President for 12 years…..HIDE your money folks; save, cut expenses, LET the recession come. NO MONEY=NO TAXES FOR OBAMAMAN.

Posted by: Rick | October 18, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

ANOTHER JOE
DO YOU NET OVER 250 GRAND A YEAR

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Yikes I’m assuming you guys are all fiscal
conservatives and not Christian conservatives. Christians do not spread hate.

Posted by: Teri | October 18, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Obama is a serial liar.

Posted by: young_voter | October 18, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

The people of St. Louis are wonderful AND very smart! I am so happy to see the turn out in St. Louis in support of Obama. He’s a great person and will make a great president. McCain and Palin are a JOKE. Obama and Biden will get my vote!

Posted by: jmb | October 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

gawd Michelle is one angry, ugly ass gorilla, dontca think jock?

Posted by: GORILLAS IN THE HOUSE! | October 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Oh for F*s SAKE! ENOUGH WITH THE PLUMBER RHETORIC! McCain… you are so void of substance that all you can cling to is this TIRED old plumber story… my GOD how do you think you are going to fare when it comes to dealing with INTELLIGENT WORLD LEADERS?! They will laugh you out of existence… or into a war.

Posted by: Facts is Facts | October 18, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

RODNEY, DID YOU GET THAT JOB AT MCDONALDS?
GET THE HELL OUT OF YOUR MAMA’S BASEMENT.
QUIT MASTURBATING TO OBAMA’S POSTER ON THE WALL YOU FREAK!

Posted by: . | October 18, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

RICK
I KEEP MY MONEY IN A SOCK–AFTER THE LAST YEAR I DONT TRUST BANKS.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

January 20th is Inauguration day; January 19th is MLK’s birthday–WANT to bet the two will be tied together as some sort of final referendum on slavery and the black man’s subordination at the hands of whitey? I am guessing January 21nd, the house or senate will pass a slavery reparations bill. Racist? Don’t think so—keep your eyes and mind open, AND your mouth shut.

Posted by: Rick | October 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

ByeBye McCain, it was a nice fight but it is over. Happy Retirement to you. Please, just do us a favor and let Palin read THE CONCESSION speech out of the teleprompter on Nov 4 by 9PM EST. It will be over by then.

Posted by: ByeBye McCain | October 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

.
THAT SOUNDS MORE LIKE YOU AND CROSS DRESSING MCCAIN—TALK TO JOE THE THREE INCH PLUMBER

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

If you don’t trust banks then PLEASE don’t trust paper money.,.. I trust you are harboring GOLD in that sock and not the worthless paper dollar… right?

Posted by: Facts is Facts | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Republicans if you dont like to redistribute the wealth then stop giving our money to the wealthy and let us keep a little more of it. Are you really defending the wealthy as your reason to call Obama a communits? Really? Defending the billionares and 250,000 dollar bracket of which most of us arent? Some never will be and with higher taxes than them under Mc Cain than Obama for the poor and middle class may never get to be. You are reall y using defend the rich and powerful from a 3% raise in taxes as unfair after windfall profits? What about the money the 250,000 dollar small business will save on Obamas healthcare plan? Doesnt that cover more of their employees at lower prices and save them more money than they are taxed? You see the error in your logic Republicans yet? No? Well get out a book and read a little. You may find that what Bush and Mc Cain are proposing is class warfare and created only two classes of wealth. The rich and the poor. No MIDDLE CLASS under Mc Cains plans!

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

msa123 – “The main reason for the problems we are seeing with the stock market have to do with greed on behalf of CEOS are are split about 50/50 dem/repub. Should there be some sort of oversight, yes, there should be. But dems are right up there in Washington as well, and the last 2 years I didn’t hear a peep let alone warning bells.”
I TOTALLY agree with you but I just don’t see McCain having any new plan that will work. Our government is cylical – Reagan came in at a time when he was very much needed and I think it is time for the Democrats to come back into power for awhile. I wish there was a possibility for a Republican congress – historically our country has done best economically with a Democrat as President and a Republican congress but that won’t happen at least for two more years. I also think there ALWAYS needs to be checks and balances and we didn’t have that for 6 years.

Posted by: allie | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

oh hell Rodney, you ain’t got no money. It’s welfare, you hope for an Obammy win so you can get more free money from whitey.
you ain’t foolin no one you idiot.

Posted by: HOUSE GORILLAS! | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

What Senator Obama means by redistributing the wealth is that the rich need to pay their fair share. No more of the failed “Trickle Down Economics” from the Bush/McCain era. Warren Buffett is one of Obama’s advisors. Here is what he says about it.
Warren: I’ll– I’ll bet– I’ll bet a million dollars against any member of the Forbes 400 who challenges– me that the average for the Forbes 400 will be less than the average of their receptionists. So, I’m– I’m– I’m– I’ll give ‘em an 800 number. They can call me. And the million will go to whichever charity the winner– designates.
Tom: How much are you hearing from your fellow rich fellows, as you describe them?
Warren: I don’t hear anything. They’re happy. They are not paying the tax rate their receptionists are.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/21553857/
But if what Bush has been doing is working for you, then go ahead and vote for McCain.

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

John McCain can not beat Obama on the issues…So he try to destroy his Character like done to John Kerry. I hope America wakes up.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: EbonySouth | October 18, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

HEY SPECK ,DRIPPER OR WHATEVER YOU ARE –WANT TO TALK TO JOE THE THREE INCH PLUMBER

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I am a Republican who is voting for Obama. I am sick of the tactics being used by a party I was once proud to be part of.

Posted by: ellen | October 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

How many people know that McCain created a bill which successfully sealed his military records.
The War Secrets Sen. John McCain Hides
Former POW Fights Public Access to POW/MIA Files
http://www.vvof.org/mccain_hides.htm

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Here are Web definition for different “welfare”. This may help people to understand what it means. We do it all the time. People who are disadvantage are given a fair share or minimum level of support to maintain their federal defined acceptable quality of living. It is wrong only when people or corporate abuses the system.
From the webs, “Welfare” may refer to:
(1) Well-being, quality of lifestyle.
(2) Animal welfare, the quality of life of animals, and concerns.
(3) In economics: Social welfare provision, government programs that seek to provide a minimum level of income, service or other support for disadvantaged peoples.
(4) Welfare (financial aid), financial assistance paid by taxpayers to people who are unable to support themselves.
(5) Workfare, an alternative model requiring recipients to participate in work-rehabilitation programs.
(6)Corporate welfare, a pejorative describing a government’s bestowal of money grants, tax breaks, or other special favorable treatment on corporations.
(7) Welfare state, in which the state assumes primary responsibility for the welfare of its citizens beyond a minimum level.
(8) Welfare economics, determines allocative efficiency and the income distribution within an economy.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 18, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

You right wingers are really whacked out of your mind. This man wants to help working class people, but you are so sick and greedy you can not see that. I feel there is no hope for this country with this much paranoia and stupidity in society.

Posted by: IDAHO INDEPENDENT | October 18, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

it makes me laugh at my inneocent hardcore republican frineds that we can’ seem to get an average job withought clearence from security agencies and obama is running for president and is a senator for God sake he must have been checked by all kinds of agencies including our media and if there was any thing factually wrong with his character he wouldn’t be running for president. grow up and have some common sense. that is the reason why our negative minded media/friends are trying to promote hate/fear among us republicans cause they don’t have no facts but useless information about obamas reputation.

Posted by: bill TX | October 18, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

HOUSE
I AM WAITING FOR THE REPUBS TO BORROW MORE FROM CHINA -FOR STIMULIS CHECK ,SO I CAN PAY IT BACK WITH INTEREST WOW–THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL A TAX BREAK REPUB STYLE

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Palin and McCAIN are serial Liars.
Palin “That report clearly showed I did nothing wrong”, refering to the report that said she “abused her power”, “I said no to that Bridge To Nowhere”.
And they call themselves “reformers”. Who are they going to reform pinnochio, I think he is more honest than they are.

Posted by: No On McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the GENERAL Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happiness.
Notice how the Constitution (I know many don’t believe it is our law anymore, but it is) states we PROMOTE GENERAL WELFARE and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. Where does it say we have the right to sit on our hands while pursuing nothing and get more than general welfare because we are lazy and feel we are somehow “entitled.” Poor lazy whiny people Americans are, every 9 seconds someone in the world dies from either not having FOOD TO EAT or NOT HAVING MEDICAL TREATMENT….and sooo many of you cry because you think you’re entitled to stay in your house instead of an apartment or go out to eat so many times a week, you think because you live here that there should never be a day, week, month, and God forbid a whole year of struggle. Get off your butt and get a second job, maybe a third if you have to. And if you think you can’t get a job at McDonalds because you are above it, they you deserve exactly what you have. (Don’t tell me you can’t find a job, fast food restaurants and retail are always hiring because of the high turnover.) I bust my butt finding extra work to pay the bills and I DO NOT WANT HANDOUTS, where is the sense of pride and dignity of taking other peoples hard earned money. Grow up America.

Posted by: Goodnight | October 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

When Palin or any of the McCain surrogates say that to vote for Obama is un-American, they show how un-American they themselves are. What kind of people are they they that they don’t believe in free speak. Oh, that’s right, they’re republican and they don’t believe in speech that doesn’t support them.

Posted by: JR | October 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

FACTS—YOU GOT THAT RIGHT.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Mc Cains redistribution of wealth plans are scary. You might want start saving for the next Depression since he is carrying through with the trickle down economy plan that bancrupted us all. Now get ready for some real pain at the pump as he gives Exxon Mobile some more tax relief only to see them raise the prices some more like they have under similar ways Bush has handled it. Get ready for the real wolf in sheeps clothing his name is Mc Cain and you Deppression might start November 5th as he accepts the win. Vote Obama/Biden whose policies are not the policies of trickle down that have come close to ruining our economy please. The only other alternative is buying another house for the Saudi Princes out of your check for gas.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Antichrist: Islam’s Long Awaited Messiah. Stop paying those bills, grab your credit cards and begin the party. The end of the world is near! We are about to discover the punchline.

Posted by: Start the Party the End is Near | October 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Texas Darlin has the signed receipt for Michelle’s Iranian Caviar, Lobster and Champagne snack. It totaled $447. Yep this is the way Socialist and Communist Dictators and Spouses live. It begins!

Posted by: Caviar | October 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Oh good. I took a few hours off to watch football with my son and its good to know that the uber consvs are still here turning off any independent or undecided voters all by themselves. Thanks! Keep up the great work.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

SARAH
I KNOW ALL ABOUT MCCAIN THE NORTH VIETNAMESE SONGBIRD

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

From Political Punch “McCain Campaign Brings On Board Yet Another Operative McCain Once Blamed For Sliming Him During 2000 South Carolina Primary”.
Now McCAIN is using the same sleezy operatives that worked against him in 2000.
These are the same slime-bags that said McCAIN fathered a black baby.
How low can he and Palin go to when an election.

Posted by: No On McCAIN | October 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Guess what No on McCain….Nancy Pelosi is the one proposing another “stimulus package” for americans, not Repubs, but, I’m sure you get your information from what friends say.

Posted by: Really | October 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Someone has to tell little Tasha that’s her medicine time…. Tasha, honey, I can almost see that vein on the side of your forehead about to pop. Get used to it, people in this country have had enough of sleazy people like you, and McCain, and Palin. Stop making up crap, NO ONE BELIEVES YOU, get used to it, OBAMA, 44TH PRESIDENT OF THE US. Yes we can!!!!

Posted by: NATASHA JUST SHUT UP! | October 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Those of you mindlessly repeating McCain/Palin lies about Obama, should at least spend as much time looking into more information about the people you are voting for. You guys are like mindless idiots following them off a cliff.

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Just in case you’re new here – someone here (posing as several) has about 20 browsers opened up on his old IBM tower PC and is posting all of this anti-Obama stuff on every single political blog here, CNN and MSNBC. Oh ya, and even Alaska Daily News. Its the same person – after you’ve been here for a while you will just IGNORE like the rest of us. You can spot him a mile a way by his screen names (usually female or ‘independent something’ or ‘former dem’ or a european name). The same cut & paste blah blah as well as spelling and grammar patterns – so obvious.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I “betcha” all you McCain/Palin supporters don’t even understand the American tax system, do you? It is sad how uneducated you are. Let me give you some learning here:
In our system, you are taxed progressively. So, if you make over $250K, and we are under Obama’s tax plan, you only pay 39% on anything over 250K that you have AFTER your deductions, etc. So, if your bottom line is 275K, you will pay 39% on 25K (275K-250K = 25K), which ends up being $9,750. Under the current system, at 36%, you would pay 36% on 25K, which is $9000.
So, you will be paying an extra $750!!!! That’s it!! For every $25,000 above $250K, you pay an extra $750 — and you are calling Obama a socialist?
And not to get overly complicated for you, but for the money of your $275K, for example, under $150K, you will get taxed at a lower rate than it is currently.
Jeez, that is not so bad. It is what is was back with Clinton and Reagan. And you whine about that. Fiscally conservative my arse. It is about time we get back to pay as you go economics and taxes are a part of that. Obama is the only choice for a fiscally conservative president that does not want to borrow our country away from China.
So go home with all of your socialist talk and get some new talking points.
Good night and good luck! And please — GET EDUCATED!

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

SARAH
KNOWING WHAT I DO ABOUT MCCAIN–I SURE WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIS TRUE RECORDS MADE PUBLIC—-HE SURE HAS A LOT TO HIDE.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

I just returned from this rally. The crowd estimate of 100,000 is low – more like 200,000 were in attendance.
I have also attended the rallys held by Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin. I listen to what they are saying. I read their plans available on their campaign websites.
It really ceases to amaze me just how out-of-touch, not only John McCain is, but there are so many citizens who are also out-of-touch. How can the McCain campaign actually espouse that it is “welfare, or socialism” – and insinuate that we don’t pay taxes?
Every one of MY paychecks is reduced because of my federal and state taxes. And at the end of the year, some are entitled to a child-tax credit, or a single parent is entitled to a head-of-household tax credit, or one of the other tax credits that is available to the working citizen. Some of the same credits are available to the higher-income working citizens. When I pay $212 out of every paycheck for my part of my health insurance, at the end of the year I am entitled to use a credit to offset this amount, if it is available. So why, all of you working citizens, can you actually allow yourself to stand by and allow the McCain-Palin campaign to belittle you, and accuse you of being of the lower class, welfare society – when the credits are taken by so many of the conservatist Republicans, as well?
Do yourself a favor, citizens who are part of the establishment of “We, the people,” and do your own homework before believing what you only hear from the “stump speeches.”

Posted by: Mickey | October 18, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

At a time that Europe is awakening up – turning to the “right” after years of “failed socialism” it would be a crime to elect Marxist Obama as the next President of the United States of America.
Even France learned the lessons of its “failed socialism” and elected conservative Nicholas Sarkozy – a staunch friend of the United States. And here we are – Americans are about to let our country destroyed by MARXIST BARACK OBAMA!
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
The following video is for the geopolitically savvy and morally sound American patriots – not for the “Obama Communust Youth”!
France’s new leader Nicolas Sarkozy gave a speech before Congress that was, dare I say, almost…Reaganesque. He called America “the greatest nation,” among other platitudes.
You can view the whole thing here, and I really think you should all watch it.
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/
He speaks of America in such glowing terms that you almost wonder if he isn’t, in some ways, more American than certain Democrats I could think of.
What’s particularly interesting is that, years ago when the Bush presidency was new and Iraq was a fresh issue, the left told us constantly that George Bush was making America less popular in the world. Yet during the President’s term in office three of our traditional allies (Canada, Germany and now France) elected leaders that displaced virulently anti-Bush and anti-American leaders with people more of Sarkozy’s temperament (Stephen Harper in Canada and Angela Merkel in Germany).
Sort of almost seems like…that whole “less popular America” thing just isn’t true.
Video: Sarkozy’s Speech Before Congress
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/video_sarkozys_speech_before_congress/

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Obama is the only person giving “straight talk”, McCain only has lies and double pek for anyone still willing to listen.

Posted by: JR | October 18, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I “betcha” all you McCain/Palin supporters don’t even understand the American tax system, do you? It is sad how uneducated you are. Let me give you some learning here:
In our system, you are taxed progressively. So, if you make over $250K, and we are under Obama’s tax plan, you only pay 39% on anything over 250K that you have AFTER your deductions, etc. So, if your bottom line is 275K, you will pay 39% on 25K (275K-250K = 25K), which ends up being $9,750. Under the current system, at 36%, you would pay 36% on 25K, which is $9000.
So, you will be paying an extra $750!!!! That’s it!! For every $25,000 above $250K, you pay an extra $750 — and you are calling Obama a socialist?
Jeez, that is not so bad. It is what is was back with Clinton and Reagan. And you whine about that.
And not to get overly complicated for you, but for the money of your $275K, for example, under $150K, you will get taxed at a lower rate than it is currently.
Republicans are fiscally conservative my arse. It is about time we get back to pay as you go economics and taxes are a part of that. Obama is the only choice for a fiscally conservative president that does not want to borrow our country away from China.
So go home with all of your socialist talk and get some new talking points.
Good night and good luck! And please — GET EDUCATED!

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Obama, first president of the New World Order….you dems get super majority, you will have NO ONE LEFT TO BLAME BUT YOURSELVES WHEN THIS COUNTRY SLIDES DOWN THE CRAPPER! You won’t be able to blame Bush, Reagan, Lincoln, Washington, Columbus, or anyone else you would blame besides owning up to your mess. Enjoy living in Russia, I mean the New World Order.

Posted by: Jimmy | October 18, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Concerned Citizen -
“Oh, then he was paid under the table and never had federal income tax withheld from his paycheck??? In most states, that is considered illegal.”
What your statement proves is that you have no idea what you are talking about. If you would actually look at the withholding tables that employers use you would find that MANY people do not have any income tax withheld from their paycheck because the wages are not high enough to cause an income tax liability. In my clients case, even if he had had any income tax withheld, it would have ALL BEEN REFUNDED when he filed his tax return because his income tax liability was ZERO. He then got $3,770 EXTRA sent to him.

Posted by: CPA | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

how pathetic it sounds to an average independent person when someone is trying to promote hate/racism because they can’t win on issues you can ask me. cause i happen to be one of those independents who backed president bush for his policies and was emotionally attached with him. not no more. hell no. i ain’t stupid enough that means i am a bit but it is an easy calculation for me when i look at what has happened in the past 8 years i ain’t going to back similar if not exactly the same policies because some one is trying to put hate in my heart.

Posted by: bill TX | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

John McSame wouldn’t know the Working Class even if he step on it, on his way back one of his 7 houses.
McSame and Sarah Clueless have no plans to strength the middle class, just more Trickle-Down Table Scraps…

Posted by: Targaray | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

They need to stop fiddling with the tax code and CUT SPENDING so that the federal government doesn’t run a deficit.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

I can see the hospital from my house. I think I’ll go over and assist on a surgery.

Posted by: PALIN yuck! | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

The McCain campaign is seeking to clarify a remark reported from a Sarah Palin fundraiser in North Carolina yesterday in which the Alaska Governor declared that she loved to visit the “pro-America” areas of the country — implying, implicitly, that there were some parts of the United States she viewed as not pro-America.
________________
This woman maliciously and falsely slanders and debases the sacrifices of all of those brave young men and women who fought and died in the service of this nation. Where are those areas of the country that are not “pro-American?”
Have these people abandoned all sense of decency in their maniacal pursuit of the White House? I, as one who is a new American, am deeply repulsed by these revolting attacks that have no basis in fact or morality. This does not represent the America I read about as a child.

Posted by: rhbate | October 18, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

You can’t beat Obama with your own policies and ideology, so just smear him. Throw the everything at him and the kitchen sink and see what sticks. It does not matter if it is the truth, just whatever works. This is why you are losing. People of sick of it.
The government just handed out the biggest “socialist handout” to corporate America to date.
We are spending $6 billion dollars a month in Iraq.
Thousands of “full-term” babies are being maimed and killed in Irag,
But if Obama wants to tax people who make over $250,000 dolllars a year the F_ _ _ING world comes to an end.
The “I’ve got mine, I want to keep as much of it as I can AND I want more” is what brought us to the edge of this economic abyss.
Everyone wants to be a Christian as long as it doesn’t cost them anything.
The poor will always be with us. Deal with it.

Posted by: allheavens | October 18, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Republican fear brings out the worst in people, especially the liars. Obama is not Muslim (he’s Christian and even McCain said so), he was born in Hawaii to as American mother (like McCain who was born in Panama, that makes him a U.S. citizen automatically), and he does not pall around with terrorists (even McCain finally admitted that lie). When the Republicans are backed in a corner (of their own making), they rely on a coninuous stream of lies and missinformation in order to create fear in the electorate. They also try to disinfranchise voters and do everything in the world to ensure the people of this great country are kepts in chains and not allowed to be free, think free or worship free. Fight the lies. Fight the Republican drive to move America backwards. Vote for Obama and the future.

Posted by: alwriter | October 18, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Correct, the democrats are proposing a stimulus package, but this time they are not just going to hand out checks to all of us like Bush did and tell us to go shopping. Among other things they want to give it to the states for infrastructure projects to create jobs.

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Alex H. are you Nuts you have not read or heard Obama. You are an Idiot for calling him hussein. Maybe there is a hussein and you are confusing Obama with? That is his middle name. Should he have changed it for Fools like you amybe you would have him change his color too? You think his middle name has something to do with tax cuts? That is what you were referring to Right?? If you think a tax cut to Workers making less than $250,000. a year is Welfare what do you do for a living. I work hard and have worked hard all my life and I am not on Welfare. But I have met people that are and YOU Big Alex should need to go to the Hospital and have major surgery without Health Insurance and we will see how long you are still Rich. I am assuming you make more than $250,000. Or you would be calling yourself Welfare. As for the College students you put down. I was a college student and I am over 50. My mom and dad are not giving me drug money. If kids are getting drug money their parents are probably the ones making over $250,000. Maybe they could give that for taxes and not drugs for their rich kids. Penalize hardworking Americans You are nuts they are the ones he is helping. People that make more money were always suppose to pay more taxes but Rep. Like Bush and McCain let them off by not even paying what the law says. Obama knows the tax dodging law breakers and YOU are probably one of them.

Posted by: she_ly101 | October 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

You really are that stupid to think the only tax Obama will raise is income taxes on those above $250K? Haha, enjoy getting robbed middle America!

Posted by: People, Really? | October 18, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Everyone wants to be a Christian as long as it doesn’t cost them anything.
Posted by: allheavens | Oct 18, 2008 7:16:33 PM
Well said.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

JOSEPH “JOE BANANAS” BONANO: Bonano crime family, who had retired to Arizona.____
DONALD R. DIAMOND: political favors for real estate developer Donald R. Diamond. McCain stepped in to use official clout to facilitate sale of land that Diamond had wanted..____
REP. RICK RENZI (R-AZ) co-chair of McCain’s Arizona Leadership Team indicted for extortion, wire fraud, money laundering and other charges related to a land deal in Arizona.
CHARLES KEATING. Keating had called on McCain, among other Senators to help him resist regulators in exchange for the money. ___
LOBBYISTS ON HIS CAMPAIGN STAFF. McCain has at least 159 lobbyists, on leave from their firms, running his campaign operation. It’s why McCain has defended lobbyists and the lobbying industry over and over again. ___
VICKI ISEMAN– PAXON TELECOM. McCain denied an affaireven though he had admitted it in a legal deposition.
RICHARD QUINN. In the 2000 primary, McCain paid $20,000 a month to South Carolina consultant Richard Quinn, a NEO-CONFEDERATE REVANCHIST ;who advocated voting for David Duke___
CHARLES BLACK JR.: …campaign adviser of McCain has friends in low places. Defended McCain’s relationship with telecom lobbyist Vicki Iseman ….lobbying clients included General Motors, United Technologies, JPMorgan and AT&T.___
SENATOR PHIL) GRAMM architect of deregulation which led to Enron and the subprime mortgage meltdown.,
“PASTOR” JOHN HAGEE: believes Pope is the Anti-Christ, believes Jews responsible for their own suffering …advocates starting a war with Iran in the Middle East to ‘hasten Armageddon’___
JACK ABRAMOFF: McCain trying to escape ties to criminal lobbyists Jack Ahramoff, Randy Scheunemann and Ralph Reed. ___
RANDY SCHEUNEMANN, Scheunemann was lobbying for the Republic of Georgia – yet now, he’s advising McCain on Georgia and Russiap conflict____
RALPH REED: Abramoff crony Abramoff directed at least $4.2 million to Reed as he defrauded Indians, McCain never called Reed to testify before the Senate .____
There is a whole cast of corrupt McCain advisors and fundraisers who prove how deeply McCain embedded is in the Republican culture of corruption -
Source: .____http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20080815/pl_usnw/dnc__mccain_watch__scheunemann__abramoff__and_reed____
CRAIG BERKMAN borrowed $5 million.from the investors whose funds he controlled without their permission, and even failed to tell “most” of them what he had done. A two-year suit against Berkman was decided in July 2008, when a jury found he had defrauded investors and ordered him to pay them $28 million.

Posted by: McCAIN Mutiny | October 18, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

MCCAIN SPEAKE WITH A FORKED TONGUE—-HE LEARN THAT TONGUE THING FROM PALIN—–(HIS SOUL MATE) WOW I THOUGHT I HEARD EVERYTHING BEFORE THAT ONE

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

This is for all the 12 year old mind set GOP bloggers out there , Ive had some T shirts made up for me & my co-workers that simply states -GOP NOT FOR ME PURE AMBIANT HATAAAASSSSS…
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Lee from louisville | October 18, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I just returned from this rally. The crowd estimate of 100,000 is low – more like 200,000 were in attendance.
Posted by Mickey
————————————-
Mickey Mouse- Yeah, hundreds of thousands of “SHEEP” attend “Marxist rallies” in Cuba and North Korea, too.
I get a sence of creepiness every time I hear about Messiah Obama’s rallies. I can not stop thinking that perhaps the October Surprise in our country (That One calls it “Change We Need”) is in fact… an “October [Communist] Revolution”
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA.

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Have any Obama fans wondered WHAT IF the things that keep coming up about Obama’s ties and background are true?
Even though McCain is not my favorite person on the earth, at least I know who he is, he has a record, and is highly regarded by many… he’s not THAT conservative. Even some repubs don’t like him for that reason alone. I think if he was a threat to our country, we’d know by now.
But this Obama shi* that keeps coming around, WHAT IF alot or most of is true?

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

TO: Jimmy | Oct 18, 2008 7:14:49 PM
I think it would be perfect if the Democrats win a filibuster proof number of seats in Congress and the Presidency.
You know why? — get ready, because this takes some thinking — because then we will really know whether the Democratic policies that will be used to get us out the crap hole we are currently in are actually worthwhile or not.
If they are worthwhile, then people like you will have to shut their mouths and apologize for all of your hate and bashing that you do everyday. And if not, then I will eat crow and vote Republican next time.
It is called being an Independent Thinker — something you seem to no ZERO about.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

* Bill Ayers participated in bombing a statue, the New York Police headquarters, the U.S. Capitol, and the Pentagon. G. Gordon Liddy participated in a White house plot to subvert the Constitution.
* Ayers has never been convicted or served prison time. Liddy was convicted of conspiracy, burglary, and illegal wire-tapping, was senteced to 20 years, and served 5.5 until President Carter commuted his sentence.
* Ayers is now a professor of education. Liddy is a conservative talk radio host.
* Ayers has said “we didn’t do enough” to stop the Vietnam War, a statement interpreted by some to mean he thinks he should have set off more bombs in the early 1970s. In 1994, after the feds stormed the branch Davidian compound in Waco, Liddy said on his radio program, [sorry, rough language coming] “Now if the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms comes to disarm you and they are bearing arms, resist them with arms. Go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests. … Kill the sons of bitches.” (And as for Liddy on Hitler….)
* Ayers and his wife hosted a campaign event at his house for Obama in 1995. Liddy hosted a campaign event for McCain in 1998.
* Ayers donated $200 to Obama in 2001. Liddy has given at least $5,000 to McCain over the years, including $1,000 this year.
* Senator Obama has called Ayers’ terrorist acts “despicable” and condemned them. Senator McCain appeared on Liddy’s radio show last November and said, “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family…. It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.”
I’m not going to bother with quantifying the sins of Ayers and Liddy. And please note, I offer no defense of Ayers here. Go ahead, assume the worst of both men, and you can say, as does Chapman, that each man “back in the 1970s, extolled violence and committed crimes in the name of a radical ideology — and… has never shown remorse or admitted error.”

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

People, Really? | Oct 18, 2008 7:20:24 PM,
And you are really naive if you think that McCain won’t raise taxes at all — does the phrase “READ MY LIPS!” ring a bell to you. You are the sheep that buy “sounds good” policies only to get reamed when nothing can be done about it because they have already been elected to office.
At least Obama has the balls to admit some taxes will be raised.
Go away!

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

SARAH
INSTEAD OF STIMULIS CHECK—THEY SHOULD JUST GIVE EVERYONE A WALLMART GIFT CARD –THAT WAY THE MONEY CAN GO RIGHT BACK TO CHINS ALONG WITH OUR JOBS.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

McCAIN said he wants everyone to be rich. Sounds like socialism to me.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

msa123 – The sky is blue, the earth is round. Don’t worry – its not true. All is well. Modernized gov’t is not socialized gov’t. Don’t be afraid. Embrace change & progress. Don’t get left behind.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Mr. Obama, you are a liar. You are not proposing tax cuts and you know it. You are using semantics to confuse the issue. But you are going to raise taxes and small business will be the hardest hit.
For once Mr. Obama, try the truth.

Posted by: Pansycritter | October 18, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

For all of those who have a problem about higher income owners paying more taxes and return given tax breaks to the middle class,ask yourself this question.?wheres your outrage when billions of our tax dollars are going to IRAQIS.who contribute zero,nada to our country.

Posted by: RC | October 18, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

To: Natasha | Oct 18, 2008 7:22:16 PM
Are you proud of your ignorance? Seriously.
To: msa123 | Oct 18, 2008 7:22:24 PM
And, most. if not all of the charges leveled by McCain at Obama have been debunked as not true. So what say you about the dishonorable campaign that McCain is running? He has gotten you hook, line and sinker — he wanted people to say exactly what you said “Well, I am not a big fan of McCain, but what if all these things about Obama ARE true”. The scare tactics have taken you — and that is sad, ignorant and naive.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

FixTheBroken….first, start with fixing yourself. Second, McCain is proposing to not raise taxes on anyone. Just because that might mean your handout isn’t as big as what Obama’s handout to you is you don’t need to cry like a little girl. You leave, oh, nevermind, you’re right, I might as well leave with my free speech before Obama is president and he takes it away for me. hahahahaha, did you punch or kick anything yet? that’s how you all respond!

Posted by: People, Really? | October 18, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Natasha,
I know you’re scared. I don’t know *why*, but I think we can all read the fear in you everytime you post. It makes us feel bad, like when a dog freaks out at a thunderstorm.
Do what my dog does. Please, go hide under the bed.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

MCCAIN IS PEOD–THAT OBAMA WANTS HIM TO PAY MORE TAXES ON THE 5 MILLION THEY MADE THIS LAST YEAR
LETS HAVE A PITY PARTY FOR (POOR) MCCAIN

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

It will be over by 9PM EST. Everything said here will then be irrelevant. McCain has never been a smart guy. The issues at hand are too big for him and Palin to deal with. It is time for the soldier to enjoy a happy retirement. HAPPY RETIREMENT SENATOR McCain. We love you.
McCain for Retirement

Posted by: ByeBye McCain | October 18, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

sarah: G Gordon Liddy was no better than Ayers. The problem is, it’s not just the Ayers connection. It’s Rev. Wright (racist radical) I mean, OBama sat in his pew listening to the guy for 20 yrs and THEN claimed he never heard him say anythinng like what we all heard him say?? It’s the Rezko connection. It’s the Saul Alinsky connection. It’s a history of creepy people. And all have supported him financially in a big way, and he has supported many of them as well, grants of all kinds went to Ayers’ projects.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

To: Pansycritter | Oct 18, 2008 7:26:35 PM
You are ignorant, Pansycritter, and you know it. Obama has the balls to admit that he will raise taxes on some people. Not McCain — he is pulling a George H.W. Bush with a “Read My Lips” no tax increase pledge — but just wait. He will raise them, and what will you say then.
Go away!

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

The GOP are ones who gave us bancruptcies with TRICLE DOWN
ECONOMICS as their policy under Bush and now Mc Cain wants more of it on a LARGER SCALE! DO you see the math Republicans? If TRICKLE DOWN gave you a BANCRUPTCY then what would a LARGER TRICKLE DOWN POLICY under Mc Cain do?? HMMM? Well let me answer since you are obviously slowwwwwwwwww… It will create a LARGER DIVIDE in classes giving the wealthiest MORE money but NO incentives to pass any if those benifits back on to you without REGULATIONS or INCENTIVES based tax. You will be more in deficit and prices can still go up if they choose because they have NO RAGULATIONS and INCENTIVES to do anything else than make money off of your poor back. Again lets recap Republicans TRICKLE DOWN economics started the RECESSION and Mc Cain wants to do it on a wider scale while also DEREGULATING your HEALTHCARE! Get it? No! Well let me say it again no matter how loud you scream about an Obama plan being communist or Marxist only MC CAINS plan is gonna make you broke and send this country into a DEPRESSION with no medical coverage for the masses. OK! Now go home hate crowd and mull that over a bit.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

FUNNY THAT PALIN IS NOT BOASTING THAT SHE WILL PUT A POOR MOOSE IN EVERY POT.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Typical Obama double-speak. Lot of hot air and no substance. Always talking negative, always looking down on people and country.
He always looks snarky and angry. He speaks angry with never a good word to say about anything.
Its never what this country has done for him, its always this country has not done enough for him. Listen to him talk, he says nothing at all or he puts down America.

Posted by: Eyes-Wide-Open | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

SHAME ON YOU ALL!
I am so saddened by folks who try to scare people as a way of making them vote for their candidate. Too Cheap!!convince me on issues and so far Obama has made more sense to me than McCain. Having lived in a socialist state before, I cant believe stupid are. Obama’s proposals has no single inclination to socialism. Besides his proposal is what will drive the engine of this nation, not what McCain is proposing. Right now we are in dedt becoz of Bush’s tax policies which McCain has not veered from. Oh…please dont waste your vote and live another 4 lousy regreting you were stupid. I am White, Conservative Republican who this year is voting for Obama…for the sake of this country. I pray to God you will join me

Posted by: King | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Look at all those anti-Americans! WOW!!!
BTW: Rolling back tax cuts for the wealthy is NOT called socialism.

Posted by: Libratine | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Alex:
Your statements are gross — gross and stupid. Just like your candidate, you can’t argue on the merits so you just fall back on name calling and empty rhetoric. “College pukes”? “Drug money”? Tell us how these things are relevant. Better yet, skip it — just crawl back under your rock.

Posted by: Gadfrey Daniel | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Well Obama, I’m 72 and retired and believe me your economic plan is killing my retirement! I am thinking of giving all my assets away and going on Democratic welfare! So much for being frugal all my life! In a socialist/communistic country spend spend spend don’t save anything because the government will redistribute your savings through taxation, keeping a major portion! You sir call it wealth, but I call it theft instead of thrift!

Posted by: kd5aey | October 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

To: People, Really? | Oct 18, 2008 7:29:25 PM
You are really a moron, aren’t you? You are very ignorant. I know McCain isn’t PROPOSING raising taxes. Because that is what he has to say to sheep in order for people to vote for him. But in the state we are in now, he will pull a George H.W. Bush who said “Read My Lips. I will not raise taxes” — but then he did just that, raised taxes.
Obama has the balls and integrity to say he will raise some taxes up front.
You have no honor.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

100,000 people showed up in Missouri today to listen to and support Obama. All McCain’s supporters can do is be insulting with his name, call him a socialist (which only shows they don’t know the meaning of the word)… McCain is for the financial elite and he’d like to get a lot of people who aren’t to think they are so they can redistribute the middle class’ wealth up to the very wealthy. The middle class is what makes our country strong. To break those in the middle so the rich can be richer and the poor can be poorer only causes us all to fall. It doesn’t even help the rich in the long run. Equality and fairness, equal access to resources and the ability to work hard and live well is a powerful part of the American dream, which McCain would very much like to see only for the ones that already have it. McCain and Palin, especially Palin, are fascists. Look up them meaning and think about that giving you freedom and hope.

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

John McClown looks and sounds like an old washed-up surgeon getting tangled up in his stethoscope, all the while reminding the worried patient what a great doctor he used to be—-30 years ago,
He’s the wrong man at the wrong time.

Posted by: Joe V | October 18, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

THIS YEAR NO MORE TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS—-WE ALL WILL TRICKLE DOWN ON MCCAIN.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

rodney,
Basically that is what is happening when the government mails out the checks and we all go shopping. It’s pathetic. We are all partly responsible for the problems of this country. The Architects of our constitution were depending on Americans staying informed and paying attention to who we were electing to run out government. We have been the missing checks and balances on our system and the people who are mindlessly repeating the lies about Senator Obama, even after they have repeatedly been proven to be untrue are the worst part of the problem. Wake up people! This is exactly what McCain wants. As long as we spend time on this bull—- he doesn’t have to talk about the issues.
McCain/Palin more of the same or potentially worse.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Sarah | October 18, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

People listen , If you make over 250,000 then you will pay a few hundred dollars more. Is that going to break you? You will still have more than enough. Some people just hate to be made to help others, thats the truth. They are greedy.

Posted by: JJ | October 18, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

NEW RULES, If Obama wins only Democrats get a tax cut,Republicans can move to Alaska with their hero Palin

Posted by: RC | October 18, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

fixthebroken: “And, most. if not all of the charges leveled by McCain at Obama have been debunked as not true.” Where have found them ‘debunked’??? Because Obama said so?! Oh please!
“So what say you about the dishonorable campaign that McCain is running? He has gotten you hook, line and sinker — he wanted people to say exactly what you said “Well, I am not a big fan of McCain, but what if all these things about Obama ARE true”. The scare tactics have taken you — and that is sad, ignorant and naive.”
So, you didn’t answer the question. What if indeed, they are true? It sounds like you won’t even consider this thought for whatever reason. Talk about the sad, ignorant, and naive.
McCain hasn’t gotten me saying anything. I research, read, study the facts. I don’t go to rallies and listen to the propaganda and lies.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

hey Alex – are you totally ignorant or just in denial. Your racist diatribe shows you to be yet another out of touch republi-nazi. Get used to this, President Obama.

Posted by: mudge007 | October 18, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Lots ‘o big scary words coming from someone named Alex. Hmmmm changing hearts & minds? Hardly. But it is a HUGE waste of your time. Good luck with that.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

sarah: what lies about Obama have repeatedly been proven to be untrue? And I’m not talking about the ridiculous ones. I’m talking about relationships with radicals, racists, radical racists, slumlords, squirrely land deals with rezko, etc. Where did you get your information that no one else seems to have?

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Alex H…reading comments like yours reminds me of how important it was for me to graduate from college. You should go back and get your GED and try to do the same instead of being angry and jealous. “College pukes”?? That live off their parents for drug money? Clearly you’ve never set foot in a university setting…except to cut the lawn possibly. Think through what your saying…real carefully and have someone help if necessary. There is a reason for a 2 party system. Both parties have their place in America and represent 2 different ideologies to provide balance. I am a republican, but for many reasons I won’t go into here I feel that I must vote democrat just this time. One big reason…Governor Palin may just be President one day should Senator McCain win. I dont know about you but I dont want somebody that is a self proclaimed soccer mom who obviously knows so little trying to navigate Washington. She needs to understand Washington before she can figure out how to “shake it up”. If you own a business, the key to running a very successful one is to hire people smarter than you to fill positions. Same thing for our country…I dont want someone “just like me” or GOD FORBID “just like you” to run things.
Anyway…chill out Alex H. You’re offensive and clearly lack knowledge of the demographic makeup of Obama supporters and so much more. Luckily people like you make up an extremely small whack fringe that wont swing things one way or the other anyway.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

SARAH
T ISSUES WOULD KILL MCCAIN AS HE DONT HAVE A CLUE.
AS FOR CREATING JOBS –WHAT JOBS AS ALL WILL JUST GO OVERSEAS—-PERHAPS A PIZZA JOINT ON EVERY CORNER
BUT THE BASIS OF OUR ECONOMY HAS GONE TO OTHER COUNTRIES.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I spend enough time here to see that the smart, calm, interesting, intelligent posters are voting for OBAMA/BIDEN in large numbers. Enough to put an end to this nonsense. Enough to embrace solid, clear, sensible change and modernization of past wrongs.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

McCain is a decent guy. He deserves a nice retirement. The White House is not a retirement home, especially now that we are facing the biggest economic crisis since the last depression.
Bye Bye McCain and HAPPY RETIREMENT.

Posted by: ByeBye McCain | October 18, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Joe the Plumber’s Revenge: Martin Nesbitt, Treasurer of Obama’s Campaign, Has Several Tax Liens
http://webofdeception.com/nesbitt.html

Posted by: LightSeeker | October 18, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

CPA: Those that do well in this country will not continue to do well in this country if many people are left in increasing poverty. People in food lines do not go to restaurants. If the people doing really well in this country, and that would be making more than 25,000 a month, if they can’t afford 1,500 a year to make sure that they still have employees who are educated, roads to deliver their product on, and peasants to buy their products, then they are foolish. The 3% increase on the 50,000 over 250,000 only comes out to 1,500 dollars. Thing about it as an investment in continuing to do well, and continuing to have peasants to buy things.
Now also… we’re not talking about 250,000 GROSS… For businesses and starlets who gross 250,000 they’re not going to see any change. Same old Same old. For those that have 250,000 of pure buy the pie profit, they’re not going to see a change either. for people making over 250,000 they will see a 3% increase on the parts OVER 250,000, so if they make 300,000 in a year as profit, after all expenses, then they’re going to pay 1,500 PER YEAR. Because if they’ve got that much money, maybe they’d like to see some decent roads, schools, healthy customers, new technology. If that’s too harsh for the poor suffering darlings, perhaps they should consider just becoming a simple person, quit whatever they’re doing and try to live on 25,000 a YEAR, not per MONTH.
Five hundred dollars per year is a lot of money to someone who makes $2000 a month. For someone who makes $25,000 a month, $1,500 is not a lot.
So when we talk about distributing the wealth, people making that much profit, you think they’d be smart enough not to kill the cow they’re milking (meaning the rest of us.).

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Obama isn’t going to get in. He should be much, much further ahead in the polls considering the low approval rating of Bush, the economy. It should be 65% Obama 35% McCain. But it’s not. What could the problem possibly be? Gee, must be how great he is and we are all just not enlightened yet.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

WITHOUT MFG JOBS THE PEOPLE WHO PAY SERVICE INDUSTRY PEOPLE HAVE NO MONEY.
ALL THE PLUMBERS CARPENTERS ETC NEED THE WORKING PEOPLE AS A BASE.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

So if Obama is so unhappy with his name, why did he take it? He had the name given by the man that adopted him but decided to take on the Islamic name of the father that deserted him and his mother. Makes sense to me.
And all that pride in the father that left him, he can’t even reach out a hand to his half-brother.
When Cassius Clay took the name Mohammad Ali, we knew why he did it. So what’s the problem Obama, you a coward?

Posted by: Pansycritter | October 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

MSA
THAT IS WHAT YOU CALL FUZZY MATH –OR WISHFULL THINKING

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Wow pansycritter – coming from someone who actually ‘chose’ that screen name as an adult! hahahahahahahaha

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I support Obama. The doctors are overcharging and the entire medical system needs to be under government control. The minorities have never had a fair deal and they are owed some of the wealth from the fat cats. The government needs to control the economy and create jobs for people and if it needs money, there are plenty of rich people who don’t pay enough taxes. Obama is going to makes thing fair and equal for everybody.

Posted by: brian | October 18, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Where is Natasha’s 1500 word limit??

Posted by: she_ly101 | October 18, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Hey Alex H and other hate peddelers;
The McCarthy era died over 50 years ago.
It’s a shame you can’t go back and live in that time, you might be much happier there, rather than living in the present.
Does the H. in your name stand for hate?
If all you can do is call people names, like a child, maybe you should spend time on the play ground where you might fit in better.

Posted by: Richard | October 18, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

rodney: You’re right. It should be more like 75% Obama. So what is the problem?

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

369. In this blog, it appears that John McCain campaign groups were so desperate and shamelessly continue to deploy more and more false character accusations on Senator Obama regarding alleged (1) association with guilt (2) Muslim faith (3) Foreign countries contribution & support (4) Socialism (5) Taxation, (6) Races, and whatever the republican diehards can think of. But wakeup guys, Obama is already destined to win in this 2008 presidential election. Their intention to scare the American voting public can no longer work. We, the American people are smarter, stronger & more inform beyond what you’ve perceived. You can no longer foul us anymore. We already know the classic trick of the Republican’s campaign utilizing “fear” & “lies”. We are fed up with the results of their eight years of failed policies which lead to the wanton destruction of life & countries. We are sad & angry for their dragging down of our economy to no where. How and why should the people vote McCain to continue such failed policies? We could prefer to have a wedding ceremony in the WH instead of a funeral procession. We could rather have a strong & experience Vice president to support the elected president, instead of a novice inexperience flower vase place holder that only give inspiration to an old stubborn, hot temper man.

Posted by: Sutter197 | October 18, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

msa123, your argument is, basically, “let’s imagine for a moment that all the accusations lobbed at Senator Obama are true.”
I’m not sure why your argument should be entertained in any serious way.
I mean, heck– let’s just imagine that Sarah Palin is right, and that dinosaurs and man lived on Earth together 4,000 years ago. Let’s imagine that Jesus will really return in our lifetime. Or let’s imagine that McCain is just as angry and unstable as he’s been accused. Or let’s imagine that the Republican party has done all the terrible things that it’s been accused of for 40 years. Let’s imagine that the CIA killed Kennedy! Let’s imagine GW Bush masterminded the 9/11 attacks!
What is the *point* of imagining these things, other than to make us suspicious and afraid?
Let’s *not* imagine.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

WSJ – Obama’s 95% Illusion: It depends on what the meaning of “tax cut” is
One of Barack Obama’s most potent campaign claims is that he’ll cut taxes for no less than 95% of “working families.” He’s even promising to cut taxes enough that the government’s tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% — which is lower than it is today.
It’s a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that he’s also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of “tax cut.”

The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
The total annual expenditures on refundable “tax credits” would rise over the next 10 years by $647 billion to $1.054 trillion, according to the Tax Policy Center. This means that the tax-credit welfare state would soon cost four times actual cash welfare. By redefining such income payments as “tax credits,” the Obama campaign also redefines them away as a tax share of GDP. Presto, the federal tax burden looks much smaller than it really is.

Because Mr. Obama’s tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge “marginal” tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned. As the nearby chart illustrates, the marginal rate for millions of low- and middle-income workers would spike as they earn more income.
Some families with an income of $40,000 could lose up to 40 cents in vanishing credits for every additional dollar earned from working overtime or taking a new job. As public policy, this is contradictory. The tax credits are sold in the name of “making work pay,” but in practice they can be a disincentive to working harder, especially if you’re a lower-income couple getting raises of $1,000 or $2,000 a year. One mystery — among many — of the McCain campaign is why it has allowed Mr. Obama’s 95% illusion to go unanswered.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html

Posted by: LightSeeker | October 18, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

For all of those fools that worked in the 90′s remember, TRICKLE UP ECONOMICS WORKED compare it to our hero BUSH Trickle down.

Posted by: RC | October 18, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Go to the below website and look at the timeline of facts about Obama.
There is references for almost all the facts, that are l inked to the original articles.
http://colony14.net/id41.html
THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Tax increase = cut job. Prices don’t go up and same $ kept in pocket of owner. So who suffers? Most likely the small business owner.
Oh well, the liberals will be happy.

Posted by: Eyes-Wide-Open | October 18, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

SOME REPUBS ON HERE SOUND A LOT LIKE THE OLD LSD GANG.
TAKE A TRIP–NEVER LEAVE TOWN
GOODNIGHT
MAY THE WRINKLED OLD GUY LOSE—-AND MAY PARIS ALWAYS WASH MY CAR—LIFE IS GREAT.

Posted by: rodney | October 18, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

JJ — The concept of Senator Obama’s Redistribution of the Wealth has already begun to derail his campaign to be the President of the United States. The kitty is out of the bag: Obama let out how he really feels. I would like you to convince anyone who works 40 hours a week that it is ok, no matter how much they earn, to pay taxes to support some bums who don’t want to work and are counting on Obama and a veto-proof Democrat House and Senate to put them on Easy Street. That whole “Community Organizer” role that he played, milking Washington for taxes to support people who didn’t know how to get money out of Washington, will really help him as President. Everyone Look Out: Hang onto your wallets.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

rodney: You’re right. It should be more like 75% Obama. So what is the problem?
Posted by: msa123
The problem is that about 80% of the country (40% on either side) is generally going to vote with their party affiliation out of a sense of pride.
Four years ago, the Republican base voted for W because we needed to stay the course. Now they’re going to vote for McCain because we need change?
At least the Dems can argue that they’re *still* trying to vote for change.
But it’s a faulty argument. The base of each party is always going to vote for their party. You probably know this already.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

timely: you said: “msa123, your argument is, basically, “let’s imagine for a moment that all the accusations lobbed at Senator Obama are true.”
I think Obama needs to hire you to help with his campaign. You have the Obamaspeak down quite well!!

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

I found a calculator online that showed me how much I would get from Obama’s tax cut. I entered our salaries, joint return, etc. Anyway, $600.00 was the amount. But, looking beyond the tax cut, what else will I get from an Obama presidency? Obama is the most libel senator in the senate. For years, he has surrounded himself with people who are far left radicals, who hate America. He wants to implement “Universal Health Care”. This will be the biggest government program in the history of the US. Can you imagine the taxes this will cost? What about the fraud, waste, and abuse? Personally, I do not want the government to have that much control over my daily life. And, Obama said the first thing he would do as president would be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act. This act will do several things: (1) It will supercede any state laws limiting abortion; (2) It will threaten doctors that don’t want to perform abortions with prosecution; (3) It will allow minor females to have abortions without parental consent; (4) It will remove the ban on partial birth abortion. Obama is not pro-choice, he is pro-abortion. When I look at all these things together: Obama can keep the $600.00. I’m voting for McCain.

Posted by: jacrac | October 18, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

“I’m not giving tax cuts to folks who don’t work, I’m giving tax cuts to people who do work.”
But Mr. Obama, you are proposing rebate checks to people that don’t pay taxes. Semantics.
So to someone that does not pay into the system, you are giving something. And that something comes out of the pocket of all of us that pay into the system. You fail to mention that.

Posted by: Pansycritter | October 18, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Have faith fellow Americans. Good will triumph over evil. John McCain will triump over Hussein Muhammad Obama.
Even the liberal elite media which have tried to influence this election in favor of Nobama will soon have to reflect the truth on the ground, which is John McCain in leading in the polls.
GOD bless America.

Posted by: sally bull | October 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Obama Obama I cannot hear it anymore, he only will adapt the USA to European standards, to a social market economy. I once wanted to emigrate to the States because I prefer free market economy, where I have unlimited possibilities, now I don’t need to emigrate anymore if Obama is going to be elected

Posted by: Lena | October 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

It seems pretty basic to me. Increasing taxes on only a small segment to give directly to those who earn less is socialism. BTW, that means, that someone like me earning about $250-$260K will be giving money to someone earning $200K. Ha, that is pretty unfair. I would also suggest that I am not Warren Buffett – which is exactly what Obama said in the debate. To skirt the issue of Plumber Joe, he rambled on about Warren Buffett without answering the question. But let me also tell you $250K earning for a family in Washington DC is certainly not someone who could or would be considered wealthy. We are still middle-class, albeit middle or upper middle, but middle-class just the same. I don’t earn millions of dollars….

Posted by: kp | October 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

good jacrac. Obama doesn’t need the vote of a liar.

Posted by: lily | October 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

John! How very cool you are! You give me greater hope for America and the Republican party!

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

McCain hasn’t gotten me saying anything. I research, read, study the facts. I don’t go to rallies and listen to the propaganda and lies.
Ok MSA123 I will tell you the hugest lie that was Debunked by your hero Mc Cain no less from his mouth. He said Obama is not an Arab, not to be feared, he is a decent man, and you would be SAFE with him as President. Mc Cain said that himself and by safe he meant there isnt any shady things about Obama.
Posted by: msa123 | Oct 18, 2008

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

How many of Senator Obama’s supporters are willing to wear an Obama button when they are not surrounded by other Obama supporters? This is really a critical question because it indicates that there are a lot of Obama supporters who are ashamed to admit to anyone that they support Obama. Why? Because during the past week it is becoming clear that many of his supporters like the idea of a welfare state and redistribution of the wealth. If you support Obama, some people will think that you are a “freeloader”, looking for a welfare check under the guise of an “income tax credit”. Watch: Some sharp Political Action Committe, also known as a PAC, not connected with Senator McCain in any way will pick up on this idea — Obama supporters who are ashamed to be identified publicly ON THEIR OWN as an Obama supporter.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Is Obama proposing a welfare state??
Let’s kick Obama’s @ss back to Kenya where he can practice his communism.

Posted by: john biden | October 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

allie: I agree with you. But not this democrat, that’s all. And if it’s Obama AND a democratic majority, there will be no checks and balances. So many here are not even willing to entertain the “what if’s” with Obama’s background and his real agenda and strategy. I think it is wise to consider. It has nothing to do with ‘imagining’ as some other joker rephrased it. All you have to do is research on your own – not listen the media – and draw your own conclusions. But people here won’t even do that. I just don’t get it. McCain isn’t a saint, but we know who he is. We don’t have a clue who Obama is – except who he says he is, and his background that we’ve managed to find. And it doesn’t look so promising to me.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Well folks, we all know that we are not going to change anyone’s minds on these boards. But down to the punch – IF Obama is elected and it all falls apart don’t come whining to us. All we’ll be able to say is we told you so. Unfortunately, once programs are initiated, they are very difficult to get rid of. So, go ahead and vote for the $1 trillion tax plan, the $1 trillion in new spending and any other programs the Dem Congress and President want to put in. The truth is, with the economy the way it currently is and the national debt the way it is, Obama’s plans are not implementable. Will there be this much outrage when the Dems continue to spend?

Posted by: wanttheelectionover | October 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Say no to communism. Say no to Obama.

Posted by: john biden | October 18, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

No one is impugning McCain’s patriotism. They’re just stating facts. The only people receiving big tax breaks under the Bush/McCain policy are the very wealthy.And big corporations.Tax cuts that McCain, like Bush will try to make permanant. The wealthy are taxed at about 18% compared to the lower and upper middle class’s 24%. Not to mention most in the middle class don’t have loop holes, and most don’t itemize.

Posted by: H&RBlock | October 18, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Obama Supporter Assaults Female McCain Volunteer in New York
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-supporter-assaults-female-mccain-volunteer-in-new-york/

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

RODNEY YOU IDIOT, YOUR MAMA TOLD YOU TO GET OUT OF HER DAMN BASEMENT AND GET A JOB A FEW WEEKS AGO.
DO I HAVE TO COME OVER AND WHIP YOUR LAZY ASS?

Posted by: HOUSE GORILLAS! | October 18, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

chris: “Ok MSA123 I will tell you the hugest lie that was Debunked by your hero Mc Cain no less from his mouth. He said Obama is not an Arab, not to be feared, he is a decent man, and you would be SAFE with him as President. Mc Cain said that himself and by safe he meant there isnt any shady things about Obama.”
Apparently you just listen to what the candidates say and take things as gospel. He was trying to calm people down who are rightly unsettled about Obama. Why are you afraid to look up Obama’s ties for yourself? Just use wikipedia on some of the characters that keep coming up.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Lily, what did I say that was a lie?

Posted by: jjacrac | October 18, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

The McCain campaign is seeking to clarify a remark reported from a Sarah Palin fundraiser in North Carolina yesterday in which the Alaska Governor declared that she loved to visit the “pro-America” areas of the country — implying, implicitly, that there were some parts of the United States she viewed as not pro-America.
________________
This woman maliciously and falsely slanders and debases the sacrifices of all of those brave young men and women who fought and died in the service of this nation. Where are those areas of the country that are not “pro-American?”
Have these people abandoned all sense of decency in their maniacal pursuit of the White House? I, as one who is a new American, am deeply repulsed by these revolting attacks that have no basis in fact or morality. This does not represent the America I read about as a child.

Posted by: rhbate | October 18, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I didn’t realise that Virgina had ‘split’ in two, but seeing as that might be the case – maybe “Normal” Virginia could be the card carrying member of the United States and “Real” Virgina could become its own territory – and McCain can be President of that? They’d get lots of money from tourism, so they’d so alright in that regard. And they wouldn’t have to spend on overseas wars, they’d just have to defend their patch against the other mainland states. And we’ll be too busy trying to fix up the Real economy, we wouldn’t have the time or inclination to bother them, so they’d be ‘safe’ from anything that currently is frightening to them. Sounds like a plan …

Posted by: chester burns | October 18, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

I didn’t realise that Virgina had ‘split’ in two, but seeing as that might be the case – maybe “Normal” Virginia could be the card carrying member of the United States and “Real” Virgina could become its own territory – and McCain can be President of that? They’d get lots of money from tourism, so they’d so alright in that regard. And they wouldn’t have to spend on overseas wars, they’d just have to defend their patch against the other mainland states. And we’ll be too busy trying to fix up the Real economy, we wouldn’t have the time or inclination to bother them, so they’d be ‘safe’ from anything that currently is frightening to them. Sounds like a plan …

Posted by: chester burns | October 18, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

ABC News should check out how many people think that Senator Obama will redistribute the wealth of hard-working Americans to support others who absolutely refuse to work.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

The tide is turning against Nobama. The liberal elite media tried their best to influence this election but have failed.
Voters will make their own decisions and it appears the John McCain will be the next President.

Posted by: john biden | October 18, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

How many of Senator Obama’s supporters are willing to wear an Obama button when they are not surrounded by other Obama supporters? This is really a critical question because it indicates that there are a lot of Obama supporters who are ashamed to admit to anyone that they support Obama. Why? Because during the past week it is becoming clear that many of his supporters like the idea of a welfare state and redistribution of the wealth. If you support Obama, some people will think that you are a “freeloader”, looking for a welfare check under the guise of an “income tax credit”. Watch: Some sharp Political Action Committe, also known as a PAC, not connected with Senator McCain in any way will pick up on this idea — Obama supporters who are ashamed to be identified publicly ON THEIR OWN as an Obama supporter.
Ill answer that one last voter. I have an Obama sticker on my car and an Obama button. I wear both with proud anywhere and no Mc Cain supporters can say anything about it. I dont see many Mc Cain supporters wearing theirs in public not surrounded by racists of their ilk or notat a hate rally. In fact most Mc Cain stuff is hidden so people dont want to be seen as bigots or Bush backers around here or anywhere I have been much. Maybe in a racist state that you might live in people live in fear of hateful people doing something to them over a button of a black candidate but around here nothing like what you say. In fact Obama stickers and signs outnumber Mc Cain signs. I will make sure to wear my button of a black candidate whever I please and no Republican can take my choice for President from me or get in my face and challenge it.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Who is playing nice Obama or McCain.
Obama knows of those incidents and has not said a word.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

hey John, that’s typical of the sick mentality of the Obama campaign isnt it?

Posted by: sue | October 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

What about all the other taxes Obama will enact if he is elected? This will hurt the working class. Obama’s welfare people will have a free ride.
Read and Learn:
Under Obama your taxes will more than double!
INHERITANCE TAX
MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax
How does this affect you? Many families have lost businesses,
farms and ranches, and homes that have been in their families
for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax.
Those willing their assets to loved ones will not only lose them to
these taxes.
NEW ADDITIONAL TAXES BY OBAMA
* New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than
2400 square feet
* New gasoline, diesel, CNG, kerosene, LPG, … taxes (5 to 10%), as if
gas prices weren’t high enough already
* New taxes on natural gas, water/sewer, electricity (10%)
* New taxes on retirement accounts: IRA, 401 – this would seriously hurt retirees and hurt working americans to save for their retirement! 28%
* New taxes on all business, small and large. The current tax rate is 35%, the highest in the world! This could hurt or eliminate many small business’s.
* New taxes to pay for socialized medicine – taxes on your health insurance insurance premiums!
Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election:
CAPITAL GAINS TAX:
MCCAIN
0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home (couples) McCain does not
propose any change in existing home sales income tax.
OBAMA
28% on profit from ALL home sales, this will hurt retirees!
How does this affect you? If you sell your home and make a profit, you
will pay 28% of your gain on taxes.
If you are heading toward retirement
and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement
community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This
proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income
from their homes as part of their retirement income.
DIVIDEND TAX
MCCAIN 15% (no change)
OBAMA 39.6%
How will this affect you? If you have any money invested in stock
market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement
accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now
be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama become president.
The experts predict that higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.
Socialism at it’s finest!!!

Posted by: Jill Taylor | October 18, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

By the way electoral average is 350 range for Obama and 150 range for Mc Cain. That means not a small shift or even moderate shift will help Mc Cain.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

“It’s time to give a tax cut to the teachers and the janitors who work in our schools; to the cops and firefighters who keep us safe; to the waitresses working double shifts, the nurses in the ER, and yes the plumbers fighting for their American Dream. These workers are the backbone of our country. They’re the ones that Washington has forgotten.” Senator Obama
OBAMA/BIDEN 2008

Posted by: judy Brown | October 18, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

you can put lipstick on Michelle, but it’s still a gorilla

Posted by: . | October 18, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

rhbate — Please give Governor Palin some slack. I am sure that she is upset with those persons who wish to denigrate our country while her son and Joe Biden’s son risk their lives in Iraq so that some people can live safely in the United States to express the freedoms that they enjoy. In fact, our troops are even protecting the right of some Americans to vote for a candidate that will Redistribute the Wealth if he is lucky enough to be elected President of the United States. We all will defend your right to do something stupid; that is your right.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

No it is not typical of Obama supporters. It is typical of a very biased media that will not report the good and bad on both sides.
It leads to more hate and racism we can not afford as a Nation, we all need to do what is right for America.
I have sent e-mails to NBC, ABC, CBS, BBC, CNN and numerous other channels with the facts and they cover it up.
Really sad as the media makes McCain supporters look like rabid racist dogs in a frenzy and it is not true.
There is good and bad on both sides, the American Press has not done it’s job. In doing this they hurt all of America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

No it is not typical of Obama supporters. It is typical of a very biased media that will not report the good and bad on both sides.
It leads to more hate and racism we can not afford as a Nation, we all need to do what is right for America.
I have sent e-mails to NBC, ABC, CBS, BBC, CNN and numerous other channels with the facts and they cover it up.
Really sad as the media makes McCain supporters look like rabid racist dogs in a frenzy and it is not true.
There is good and bad on both sides, the American Press has not done it’s job. In doing this they hurt all of America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Uh, Alex H., honey, the Bush administration already established the biggest welfare system when it gave billions in tax breaks to corporate America.
And as far as the “college pukes” go, let me guess: you failed your GED exam? I can’t imagine how your life would suck even more once the Republicans take away your overtime.

Posted by: OffalTruth | October 18, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Look Republicans the Democrats dont have to play nice after you all have spit on their candidate for a year now with false allegations of muslims and terrorists ties. Then you call us all marxist, communists, traitors, liberals, fascist, black lovers with the N word sometimes, kill our candidate, monkey, now I dont know what that sounds like where you guys are from but those sound like fighting words from bigots trying to intimidate people from voting for a black candidate. The Republicans have stopped just short of lynchings and beatings of African Americans but have already had one incident where they kicked a news reporter at one. The only thing that stopped them from lynchings and call for death was Mc Cain who saw it going that way and stopping them before his VP incited a riot with her hate talk. Those sound like hate and sound like you should be ashamed of being apart of it not to mention the failures economically of the RFepublicans but you choose to associate with it anyways which says alot about the people voting for Mc Cain and his candidacy itself.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

nobama: “Note to self…Nov. 5th…If Obama is elected…quit job…sign up for welfare, food stamps, WIC, housing subsidy , AFDC” … sounds like you don’t want to make an honest living, that you envy the ‘poor’ their ‘leisure time’. The wealth ladder has about a hundred steps on it – you sound like you’re clinging to rung number three, and instead of trying to do anything to make that climb easier for all, you just want to look below you and snarl abuse at the least fortunate. That’s what most of the “Vote McCain” chant sounds like – fear and envy. Frightened that more people might get a chance to do a little better for themselves and envious of their own inability to keep up with life’s struggle. A vote for Obama is a vote for a better future for all of us – particularly those who are hard working. You don’t sound like you fall into that category – you’d like to see the economy flatten everyone and hope that 50% of the country never gets a chance to stand up again. Get over yourself and move on.

Posted by: chester burns | October 18, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Taxes or not to tax and do cuts in programs – it is the same thing. The cuts in programs means higher property taxes, fees on services, increases behind the scenes – it is the same thing just called something else. Someone does have to pay taxes because the stupid current administration took us into a war we never should have been in and spend 10 million dollars a month. Who is paying for this – China is. So may be the tax payers better start paying up and start with voting the Republicans out and Obama in so we can get out of this war – that Mccain and Palin want us to continue. Then the economy will have more money for the programs and the need for taxes will go down. Wake up America and stop believing the lies McCain spews continuously – he can’t even keep his story straight.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

judy Brown — I wish you were right about the tax cuts. Perhaps you missed the news this past week: All of the people that you mentioned will not get a tax cut because there are too many freeloaders in America who support Obama that are counting on their man to Redistribute the Wealth. With our economic meltdown, perhaps you missed the story that the Middle class and “rich” people won’t be around to pay the type of taxes that Obama was counting on last month — some are now broke, others have lost up to half of their wealth. This means that as President of the United States, Obama will have to look at you and your friends to support the freeloaders who absolutely refuse to work. Just check out this ABC NEWS web site — the tide is turning against Senator Obama. Just hang onto your wallet because he told “Joe The Plummer” that he would redistribute the wealth. Sorry, but that’s the way it is.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Obama will take the money from the rich fat cats and give it to needy people. He will make the medical system fair by having the government run the system and make sure everybody gets covered. The Doctors have been overcharging for years and now they are going to be forced to take reasonable salaries and stop ripping us off. Obama is going to create jobs by taking from the rich and funding government programs which employ people. Obama is going to make things fair and equal for everybody. It is time that the rich people started to pay and things are fairer for normal people.

Posted by: James | October 18, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

SUE, Hello you right wing NUTS. Take a look at your 401K plan and ask yourself who has your money. Ans. a rich person is holding your money. You people are so stupid. Taking the taxes back to the level is now called Socialism. SUE please take a second look at your 401K and than ask yourself who is in office now and who has controlled the GOV the last 12 years. Look at all the thousands of dollars you do not have now. SUE you are the smartest person in the world. Under Bush you have lost thousands of dollars. I guess Bush is a Socialist also

Posted by: Joesnopy | October 18, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I think it is time to recognize that Israel has caused the US to spend outrageous amounts of money which could be better used to help with heating bills and gas prices. Obama is going to make sure that we don’t support Israel anymore and wast all of the money overseas. Obama is going to stop the one sided support of Israel and start treating the Arab world with proper respect.

Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

The modern Republican party is a party of “me.” The modern Democratic party is a party of “we.”
Look at any district-by-district election map; almost anywhere that has more than a few thousand people living together tends to go blue. Even in “red” states, cities are bastions of Democratic voters. Even in “blue” states, the stretches of land between cities goes to the Republicans.
I am reminded of the old saying, “it’s easy to be a holy man when you’re on the top of a mountain.”
Similarly, it is very easy to vote for only your own self-interest when you never have to interact with people of other races, creeds, economic backgrounds or differing sexual identities. But when people are actually living and working in an environment of diversity, they start to realize that the whole country does not revolve around them.
The USA is more than just a collection of isolated individuals.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

“John McCain and the GOP don’t give a crap about struggling families.” – Hey, you are so ignorant and stupid, period! McCain will cut taxes for all Americans, only the degree would be different depending on how much you make. Go to the fact check website and do your DD first before trashing GOP. You might well find out (by surprise) that you would get more tax cut under McCain’s than Obama’s. Don’t follow second hand opinions, get the facts directly from reliable resources yourself. I hope your next comment would show little more wisdom! Take care!

Posted by: tiger | October 18, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

100,000 people. This guy get’s people excited. McCain goal is to get his base angry. In the past that’s what it took to win an election. Schmidt may have met his match here – it will be close – and there will never be an election like this one in our lifetime!

Posted by: jburke | October 18, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

I see it this way, all politicians are dirty to some respect, some more than others.
I will take the known over the unknown.
Most of the so called rumours are fact about Obama if you look it up and do some research. He is tightly tied in with Chicago crime and its croonies.
He also will not release a ton of documents that should have been released before he was a Senator.
What everyone Dems and Rep needs to do to see if Obama is honest, is to demand he relase all documentes that has been requested.
McCain and his wife released over 10K of Documents.
The issue most people have is not about lying, about Ayers etc. It is his judgement of having these relationships at all.
He alreadys stated in a recorded speach ACORN will help him shape his Presidential Policy during his transition to President if he wins.
Folks that is scary. Do we want these nut jobs who cause havoc at voter polls, to help make policy at the highest level.
They know they wioll not get many fraudulent votes through, but they may get some or a lot. The key thing they do is vcreate havoc and tie up important resources at election sites who are already usually understaffed.
If a person registers and votes early the same day, and they are not eligable to vote that is voter fraud.
How many of these in stances have already happened we do not have the resources to check out.
Think about the man you want as President, research them, do Google searches etc. Make an informed decision.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

100,000 mislead morons.

Posted by: Joe | October 18, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Soon the second Messiah will take power and the rest of my plan will be revealed to you.

Posted by: Beelzebub | October 18, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Redistribute whos wealth? The Millionares and less than 5% who are not middle class by the way and not the majority or even close? Redistribute a tax that is fair from some taxes paid to just a little more to those who can afford that fair amount? That is just the delusions of Republicans to win the race again I say the ELECTORAL VOTe advantage is in the 350 range to 150 and not small boost or medium boost is gonna save your lieing attemps because your candidate is gonna lose. Fear is in the air and it is showing. PSST! Just a little more than 2 and a half weeks until election Republicans. Keep up the fear campaign. I see it is going just fine.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Barack Obama does not want to see the wealthy few rolling in millions while the people who work hard every day go bankrupt without healthcare. WAKE UP REPUBLICANS! This affects YOU. I thought you hated elite people like McCain and Bush…who laugh at working people when they’re at their fancy dinners. Real Republicans who know what the party stands for are rejecting McCain and Bush.

Posted by: Bethany Donovan | October 18, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Can anyone spell W-E-L-F-A-R-E?

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

IT MUST BE SOME TIME OF SCIENTIFIC EQUATION, BUT IT’S FUNNY HOW IGNORANCE & BIGGOTRY CAN BREED SUCH OUTRIGHT LIES, SMEARS, PROPAGANDA & IDIOTIC STEREOTYPE CONCEPTIONS, THAT THE WORLD IS NOW WATCHING IN AWE AND FOR ENTERTAINMENT…America, home of the free, equality, humanity, equal rights, one nation under…and all that blah blah that we try to choke down the throats of other countries…and NOW they gets the opportunity to witness the RAW LIE OF IT ALL! How ironic…

Posted by: TRUTHradar | October 18, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Like he said “It’s time to give a tax cut to the teachers and the janitors who work in our schools; to the cops and firefighters who keep us safe; to the waitresses working double shifts, the nurses in the ER, and yes the plumbers fighting for their American Dream. These workers are the backbone of our country. They’re the ones that Washington has forgotten.” Senator Obama
OBAMA/BIDEN 2008

Posted by: Judy Brown | October 18, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Calling names does not help, but builds more hate and racism.
Right is called racist because we do not support the left, and vice versus.
It is not Left vs right. It is all of us for America.
Research each candidate in depth, make an informed decision.
See what they have done or not done.
America is in crisis

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Michelle is one ugly ass, angry militant racist gorilla, dontcha think?
ugggghh, go back to Kenya b*tch!

Posted by: MONKEY HOUSE | October 18, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Here’s a HEADS UP — JUST IN —Look for a television commercial during the last week of the presidential campaign airing on October 27th for a week, showing typical hard-working Americans being interviewed and commenting on Senator Obama’s plans to Redistribute the Wealth. It will end with ACORN workers collecting signatures and Chicago-style Community Organizers showing how to collect welfare and other payments from Washngton. It will spark an outcry of “racism”, which is not the intent, but it will give working Americans a voice in this election.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

These post show just how much republicans and their supporters hate struggling americans. They are hell bent and dead set helping anyone that truly needs it. However, they fall all over themselves giving tax cuts and other financial benefits to corporations and the wealthy. Typical republican philosophy.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

These post show just how much republicans and their supporters hate struggling americans. They are hell bent and dead set AGAINST helping anyone that truly needs it. However, they fall all over themselves giving tax cuts and other financial benefits to corporations and the wealthy. Typical republican philosophy.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

I am really saddened by the ignorance, hate, and yes stupidty of both sides.
If you have questions about any candidates research them in depth.
Again we need to work together.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

McCain/Palin = Corporations First, I make very little and I WANT TO KEEP WHAT’S MINE!!!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Alex H:
Most of obama’s supporter don’t contribute to society? The hate and ignorance in your posting is chilling. I pray for you.

Posted by: mark the plumber | October 18, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next ten years, according to a newly updated analysis by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center. Compared to current law, TPC estimates the Obama plan would cut taxes by $2.9 trillion from 2009-2018. McCain would reduce taxes by nearly $4.2 trillion. Obama would give larger tax cuts to low- and moderate-income households and pay some of the cost by raising taxes on high-income taxpayers. In contrast, McCain would cut taxes across the board and give the biggest cuts to the highest-income households”.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 18, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

MONKEY HOUSE — McCain supporters reject your comments totally and support efforts to place you under a security watch. Your comments about Michelle Obama are off base and we hope that you are identified and dealt with accordingly.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Well, if we’re going to play the Guilt by Association game, let’s go!
Perhaps McCain would like to explain these associations to the American people, including why he chose to appear on G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show less than a year ago and praise him.
Help spread the word – make this viral. Learn these facts to rebut smears against Obama’s ties, post them on your blogs, share them with others and email them to the editorial pages of your local newspapers. You CAN make a difference.
Jim Hensley, Convicted Felon
G. Gordon Liddy, Convicted Felon
Charles Keating, Convicted Felon
Raffaello Follieri, Convicted Felon
Rick Renzi, Under Indictment
Rick Davis, Freddie Mac Lobbyist
Charles Black, Lobbyist for Dictators
Richard Quinn, White Supremacist
Pastor John Hagee, Bigot
Pastor Rod Parsley, Bigot
Todd Palin, Member of Secessionist Group
Andrew McCain, Resigned Manager Savings & Loan

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Hmmm? October the 27th you say after all of the early voting has been done for weeks??? Alot of which happened during the Obama surge?? Good theory from a Republican again another THEORY. Again 350 to 150 two and a half weeks for racists and fear mongeres to supress enough voters and intimidate enough to not get out to vote. Hopefully a name like a sinister company called ACORN instills enough fear to accomplish all of those goals. Wink.

Posted by: Chris | October 18, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

100,000 people at Obama’s rally in St. Louis Missouri? Wow, can you smell the fear Republicans, it must be thick in the air at McCain headquarters!!
How many people did the old man draw at his rally today, Oh I know – Joe the Plumber!!
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | October 18, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Why is it that all the Republicans can do is spew lies & attack Obama? If John McCain, Sarah Palin and all they stand for are so wonderful then why are you all on the defensive all the time? Just state your cause, if it’s SO great it will speak for itself and you won’t have to talk trash.
It’s as if you’re little wimps on the playground who calls the bully “stupid” as you walk away because you know that in reality he can & will kick your butt.

Posted by: Julie | October 18, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Just as Mr. Obama mentions to not take anything for granted. We need to VOTE … and trump the GOP nonsense leadership we’ve had to put up with. Don’t ya’ll get it Mr, McCain has been lying since day one of this campaign. Do you think he would stop. Haven’t you noticed that he talks down to you in his speeches because he knows his base thinks in black and white. Wouldn’t it be far better to have a president that speaks intelligently because he has the faith in you that you understand. That is far more authentic than you betcha politics.

Posted by: janefreedom | October 18, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Does John McCain “pal around with terrorists?”
Certainly McCain’s continuing “association” and relationship with the convicted Watergate burglar and domestic terrorist G. Gordon Liddy might suggest that is the case, if we are to apply the standards drawn by the McCain campaign.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/15/ayers-and-the-mccain-g-gordon-liddy-symbiosis/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Julie, have you ever taken a look at what sissy BHO is?

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

1. Privatizing Social Security – McCain opposed privatizing Social Security but now he supports it.
2. Iraq Troop Withdrawal – McCain said if the Iraqi govt asked American troops to leave he would support that decision. Now McCain oppose that position.
3. Tax Cuts – McCain supported tax cuts for the wealthy after opposing them in 2001.
4. Judges – McCain flip flops on judges depending on the crowd. He tells conservatives he wants to clone Alito and Roberts. He tells independents and Democrats that he supports Breyer and Ginsburg.
5. Torture – McCain was against torture, now he’s for torture.
6. Negotiating with Hamas – McCain said that it was okay to negotiate with Hamas in 2006. Now he opposes it.
7. Bush Third Term – McCain says he is not running for Bush’s third term yet says that he agrees with George W Bush on all the transcendent issues of the day.
8. Agents Of Intolerance – McCain called Falwell and Robertson agents of intolerance. Now they are no longer such.
9. 527s – McCain opposes 527s being used in presidential campaigns, McCain now supports 527s being used in presidential campaigns.
10. Gramm’s Whiner Comment – McCain supports Phil Gramm’s Americans are whiners comment but later in the day disagrees with this comment.
11. Economic Expertise – McCain says he is not an expert on the economy. McCain now claims he is an expert.
12. Illegal Wiretapping – McCain said that Bush’s wiretapping program was illegal. Now McCain says it is legal.
13. Habeas Corpus – McCain used to support habeas corpus for detainees at Gitmo and other places. Now McCain opposes habeas corpus for these same detainees.
14. Everglades Restoration – McCain supported restoring and saving the Everglades. McCain now opposes it.
15. Gay Couple Legal Contracts – McCain opposed legal contracts for gay couples. McCain said on the Ellen Degeneris show that he supports such contracts.
16. GI Bill – Mccain opposed the GI Bill but now claims he supported it.
17. Military Service Exploitation – McCain says he would never exploit his military service while running for office. McCain now exploits his military service while running for office.
18. Roe v. Wade – McCain opposed overturning Roe v. Wade. McCain now supports overturning Roe v. Wade.
19. States Rights On Abortion – McCain supports federal legislation banning abortion after saying that abortion should be left to the states.
20. ANWR – McCain opposes drilling in ANWR, now supports drilling in ANWR.
21. Offshore Drilling – McCain opposes drilling within 60 miles of American coastlines. McCain now supports drilling within 60 miles of American coastlines.
22. Role of States in Drilling – McCain believed that drilling offshore should be left to the states. Now McCain wants that decision made by the federal government.
23. MLK Holiday – McCain voted against a MLK holiday. Now he supports it.
24. Windfall Profits Tax – McCain supported the windfall profits tax, McCain opposes the windfall profits tax.
25. Filibuster of Judges – McCain supports filibustering judges. McCain opposes filibustering judges.
26. Confederate Flag – McCain calls flying the Confederate flag a symbol of heritage. McCain later denounces himself.
27. Civil Unions – McCain supports civil unions for gay and lesbian couples, then 30 seconds later McCain opposes civil unions for gay and lesbian couples.
28. Constitutional Ban On Gay Marriage – McCain opposed a constitutional ban on gay marriage, McCain now supports a constitutional ban on gay marriage.
29. Yucca Mountain – McCain says that people in Nevada who oppose nuclear waste being dumped in Yucca Mountain have a NIMBY problem. McCain opposes nuclear waste being dumped in his own town.
30. Undue Lobbyist Influence – McCain is against undue lobbyist influence. Now McCain’s campaign is controlled almost entirely by lobbyists.
31. Abortion Exceptions – McCain supported exceptions for abortion in cases of rape, incest or to sae the life of the mother. Now he won’t.
32. Defense Cuts – McCain opposed spending cuts for defense. Now McCain is willing to support them if corporate tax rates are reduced.
33. Waterboarding – Mccain said waterboarding is torture. McCain now says waterboarding is an extra measure and not necessarily torture.
34. Mandatory Caps – McCain used to support mandatory cap and trade policies on emissions. Now he opposes them.
35. Citizenship for Immigrants – McCain supported a bill with his own name on it allowing illegal immigrants a path to citizenship. Now McCain opposes his own bill.
36. Flying The Confederate Flag – McCain supports flying the Confederate flag at the South Carolina statehouse. McCain does not support flying the Confederate flag at the South Carolina statehouse.
37. Bush Tax Policies – McCain opposed Bush’s tax policies that hurt the middle class. McCain now supports Bush’s tax policies that hurt the middle class and is their biggest advocate.
38. South African Divestment – McCain opposed South African divestment. Now he supports it.
39. Alternative Minimum Tax – McCain supported phasing out the Alternative Minimum Tax. Now he opposes it.
40. Estate Tax Repeal – McCain opposed, as recently as 2006, plans to repeal the estate tax on estates valued in the millions. Now McCain wants to repeal the estate tax.
41. North Korea Negotiations – McCain opposed negotiating with the President of North Korea. After Bush negotiated with President Kim Jung Il, McCain supported it.
42. Iraq + Stay The Course – McCain supported Rumsfield policies of stay the course in Iraq. McCain now claims he never supported such policies.
43. Creationism – McCain opposed creationism being taught as Science in public schools. Now McCain supports them.
44. Time of Offshore Drilling – McCain said that offshore drilling would take years. Now he says it would help in the short term.
45. Campaign Finance Reform – McCain supported a grassroots campaign finance reform lobbying bill with Senator Russ Feingold. Now he opposes key provisions in it.
46. Immigration Act – McCain cosponsored a Development Relief and Education Aliens Minor Act for immigrants. Now he opposes it.
47. Fidel Castro – McCain supported negotiating with Fidel Castro in 2000 but opposes negotiating with Castro or Cuba in 2008.
48. Pakistan – McCain opposed unilateral action against terrorists in Pakistan when Obama supported it. Now McCain supports it.
49. Bush’s Pioneers – McCain opposed Bush’s Pioneer fundraisers as lawbreakers. Now he coopted them.
50. Occupying Muslim Lands – Against it when Clinton was President, now for it.
51. Russia + the G8 – McCain was against kicking Russia out of the G8 then was for it.
52. Law Of The Sea Treaty – McCain supported the Law of the Sea Treaty but now opposes it.
53. Ease of Iraq Conflict – McCain said the Iraq conflict would be easily won. Years later, McCain said that he knew all along that it would be difficult.
54. Withdrawal from Iraq – McCain opposed telling the Iraqis a timeline for withdrawal. McCain later gave the year 2013 as the timeline for withdrawal.
55. NRA Influence – McCain was against the NRA influencing the Republican Party platform but now he is for it.
56. Arizona earmarks – McCain supports earmarks in Arizona. McCain opposes earmarks in Arizona.
57. Ethanol – McCain was against ethanol before he was for ethanol.
58. Balanced budgets – McCain supported them, then opposed them.
59. Economic Times – McCain says Americans are worse off economically under Bush before claiming they were now better off economically on Bush.
60. Litmus Tests – McCain was for litmus tests and then against limit tests.
61. Hagee- McCain welcomed John Hagee’s support but then didn’t welcome John Hagee’s support.
62. Wyly Brothers – In 2000 McCain accused the Wyly brothers of spending dirty money. In 2008, McCain sought their money.
63. Grover Norquist – McCain called Grover Norquist corrupt and a shill for dictators. Now McCain calls him a key political ally.
64. Syria – McCain supported diplomacy with Syria before opposing diplomacy with Syria.
65. Global Warming – McCain supported legislation to reduce global warming before opposing that same legislation.
66. Cigarette Taxes – McCain supported raising cigarette taxes, McCain opposed raising cigarette taxes.
67. Katrina Investigations – Was against them but claimed he was for them.
68. Surrogates – McCain says surrogates speak for presidential candidates, releases 16 press statements to said effect, and then says surrogates don’t speak for the candidates after Gramm’s nation of whiners comment.
69. Equal Pay For Women – He said in Wisconsin he was for it, then said he would have voted against the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
70. Pittsburgh or GreenBay – McCain claimed that he gave the defensive line of the Packers to Viet Cong capturers but while campaigning in Pittsburgh, he flipped his stores to the Pittsburgh defensive line
71. Rumsfield – Effective Secretary of State. Not an effective Secretary of State.
72. Bush Iraq Beginnings – Bush doing a great job from the beginning, McCain said never aligned with how Bush was doing in the beginning.
73. Religion – Depends on the audience.
74. Bob Jones – Bad idea to go there, great idea to go there.

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

BO “Spread the Wealth Around” just what the Democrats love…. More Class warfare…. the FACT is small business will be TAXED @ a higher rate under BO….. he and the media are just plan LIEING……… PLUS when you raise taxes on Businesses… GUESS WHAT … they raise their prices….. so who actually pays “THE CONSUMER….. YOU PAY”….. so this is just a HIDDEN tax on the consumer…
Posted by: Vet1973 | Oct 18, 2008 3:58:26 PM
—————————————-
Vet1973,
You are probably getting bent over and screwed by republican policies unless you’re wealthy. Republican have shown thru their policies they don’t give a damn about struggling americans. They only pander to them during elections. Afterwards it back to helping coroprations and the wealthy while screwing struggling americans.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

As a republican I make just over 60K per year. Some from my job and some from an early retirement.
My taxes are too high and I am not an elitist.
But taking from the rich to give to the poor is not right.
America was built on working for a living to get ahead. Yes I sometimes wish I had more. But at least I worked for every penny I earned.
I am not on welfare and never have been.
I will always work for what I earn and never take welfare as that is the lazy way out and goes against how I was raised.
Joe the Plumber asked the question. That got the answer which will IMHO cost BHO his bid for the Presidency.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Obama says he will redistribute the wealth. This is much fairer than having the fat cats with all the money and others with not enough. He will raise the taxes on the rich and make sure that normal folks have money for heating bills and normal living. There is nothing wrong with taking from the rich and giving to less fortunate. The Obama government will make things fairer. The rich fat cats have had it their way for years, now it is our turn

Posted by: Brian | October 18, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Obama the magic negro is going to prison.
I’m Tony Rezko and I approve this message.

Posted by: Rezko | October 18, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Obama is right….there certainly is a lot of wind blowing across America.

Posted by: Tom in MA | October 18, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Why is it that all the Republicans can do is spew lies & attack Obama? If John McCain, Sarah Palin and all they stand for are so wonderful then why are you all on the defensive all the time? Just state your cause, if it’s SO great it will speak for itself and you won’t have to talk trash.
It’s as if you’re little wimps on the playground who calls the bully “stupid” as you walk away because you know that in reality he can & will kick your butt.
Posted by: Julie | Oct 18, 2008 8:44:14 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Typical liberal peon attacks. Angry, nasty, snarky, divisive and scurrilous attacks.
Yet they are the first to accuse others of trash talk and attacks. Typical of Obama supporters. Attack and accuse. Just like their leader, he would be so proud of them.

Posted by: Pansycritter | October 18, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Obama wants to take your money and share it with other people. Is that what we want for America? Why would anyone continue to work hard , spend years in college to earn a good salary to take care of his family and then watch as the Obama government decides to take it and give it to others. If you look at how much Obama gives to charity compared to what McCain gives I think you will see who really takes care of others. The difference between the two is that with McCain I can decide who I give my money to and with Obama the government will decide in his redistribution of wealth plan.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 18, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I just don’t get it. Statistically only 25 of the people as I write this post (514) make more than $250k. And yet there’s far more than 25 people that would rather see more money handed to the 25 than the 475 (including yourselves)?
Give more money to the 25 in hopes that the 475 will see a piece of it? Good luck with that.

Posted by: frank | October 18, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

How many of you out there received your economic stimulas check this past summer??? Was that welfare?
A good portion of the public were instructed to file even if they were under the federal filing requirements, such as senior citizens etc. Obama’s plan is not welfare.

Posted by: jen | October 18, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

“But taking from the rich to give to the poor is not right.”
John, you’re darn right about that one!!!
As far as I know we don’t live in Europe–YET!!!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

I’m glad all of you fools making under $250K think a cut on your taxes are welfare. None of you that are posting that are against Barack are making more than $250K. You’ve been brain-washed! Wake up!!! You can’t pay your bills, your mortgage payments are due and you’re children’s college dreams are only just dreams. Wake up and save the country. Another 4 years and we may be owned by China!
See how the tax cuts will help you.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/18/how-will-baracks-tax-cuts-help-your-family/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

If anyone here makes more than $250,000 a year and still has time to waste posting on pointless comment boards, you aren’t working hard enough for it in the first place.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

There is a must-read article in The Guardian by Brad Friedman titled “The Republican Voter Fraud Hoax”
Here is an excerpt. Why isn”t more of the mainstream media on this?
“…It”s a hoax. All of it.
But it”s been an effective one, as it”s served to distract from very real concerns about tens of thousands of voters who have been illegally purged from the voting rolls in dozens of states, as the New York Times reported in a remarkable front page investigative story. That story followed a report the week before from CBS News detailing still more wholesale purges of voting rolls in some 20 states.
That will be the November surprise, when thousands, if not millions show up to vote only to find they are no longer welcome to do so and are forced to vote on a “provisional ballot” which may or may not be counted.
These real concerns of election fraud, such as voting roll purges, electronic voting machines that don”t work and so much more that actually matters, have been obscured by the smoke and mirrors and sleight of hand of the Republican party”s phony Acorn voter fraud charade.”

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

If you want to talk about welfare, let’s talk about the corporate welfare that’s been given out hand over fist for the past eight years. Or the welfare for the top 5% who pay less tax in most cases than those in the middle. Let’s not even talk about the big oil companies and what they’ve gotten away with. It’s only welfare when it’s not for the wealthiest few, I see now. NOT!

Posted by: Julez39 | October 18, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

“think a cut on your taxes are welfare.”
Hey zuq, by your poor grammar we can tell what race you are

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

“But taking from the rich to give to the poor is not right.”
John, you’re darn right about that one!!!
Posted by: plainsm
You know, for being “a Christian nation,” you’re pretty much slapping Jesus in the face with comments like these.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.
Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group’s efforts.
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a “Homeownership Promotes The Economy” taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that — contrary to GOP outrage — he was not upset with the group’s voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which “changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts.”
Go here to see a photo of McCain with ACORN Members.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/17/acorn-mccain-and-gop-used-to-be-supporters/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

“Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution which represents the transitional stage between capitalism and communism”

Posted by: amazed801 | October 18, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I love it! 100,000 people. You certainly don’t see that many people at McCain’s events.
On a personal note, I live in Washington state and I voted for Obama today!

Posted by: steve9337 | October 18, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Wake up – you selfish Republicans – you won’t have any money to call your own if you vote McCain/Palin in. The country owes trillions to China and Wall Street is broke – due to Bush and the current admin. My 401K was hit big time. McCain and Palin love war – McCain first supports and signs the bailout and now critizes it. You cannot believe one single word out of his mouth or Palin’s. Obama is not a socialist. He is not a muslim. He is a christian man that is an American citizen and he cares about the American people. During the Great Depression Americans helped each other out and rebuilt America – it is time for us to do that now – with an honest President – Obama!!!

Posted by: Marty | October 18, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

It’s not a lie that Senator Obama is the most liberal senator. It’s not a lie that he went to Reverend Wright’s church for twenty years. It’s not a lie that he said “spread the wealth”. Based on the facts, Senator Obama appears to embrace a socialistic ideology, and that worries many Americans. That doesn’t make us racist or liars.

Posted by: jacrac | October 18, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

McCain tied to radical anti-semitic, racist organization
Thanks to the Richmond Democrat for the info below.
WHO IS JOHN McCAIN? Read below.
I wish I could say I was surprised by this, but let face it: there were signs. There was John McCain’s long opposition to a national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr., his use of racial epithets, his love of racist jokes, and the increasingly racist tone of his campaign.
It seems that John McCain was a member and sat on the board of the US Council for World Freedom (”USCWF”), an organization noted for its extreme ideology, racism, and anti-semitism. This organization has been described as “largely a collection of Nazis, fascists, anti-Semites, sellers of forgeries, vicious racialists, and corrupt self seekers.” Why on earth would John McCain associate himself with such a group? Why would he take a leadership position with it?
McCain’s connection to the group became news when Paul Begala mentioned it on Meet the Press.
Go here for more.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/07/mccain-tied-to-radical-anti-semitic-racist-organization/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Average Americans must have gotten wrong impressions that McCain doesn’t care about middle class families because he has tried little too hard to explain the differences between him and Obama which is not to raise taxes for rich people. But he did mention tax cut for middle class on various occasions. In fact, you get more tax break if you make ~$130K (maybe $100K?) under McCain’s plan. Almost all the media networks are in the tank with Obama and they rarely mention McCain’s mentioning of middle class and they tell people he rarely mentions economic issues, which is really untrue. Anyway, check out the facts before jumping the gun.

Posted by: tiger | October 18, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

GOOGLE MCCAIN AND LIDDY !!! YOU WILL BE SHOCKED!!!!

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

“But taking from the rich to give to the poor is not right.”
John, you’re darn right about that one!!!
As far as I know we don’t live in Europe–YET!!!
Posted by: plainsm | Oct 18, 2008 8:51:40 PM
—————
You are both way off track. First, there is already a differential between income brackets. Second, the change only brings the level back to were it was before the failed BUSH policies, which McCAIN wants to continue. Third, the change is a mere 3% of that amount over $250,000 (peanuts).
The richest man in the US is supporting Barack Obama because he understands that what we loose due to failed economic policies is far greater than this pitance of a tax “increase” on those who can afford it most.

Posted by: Indevoter | October 18, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Forget about being a Republican or being “Rich”. Vote for your self interests because the country will take care of itself as long as there is someone around who can be taxed. With Senator Obama’s Redistribution of the Wealth, he will find hard working Americans earning something so that he can give it to people who prefer to live on welfare and refuse to work. At some point, people on welfare will not be able to support people on welfare because in a welfare state, they will be the only one’s left standing. It has nothing to do with being Republican, “rich” or hard working Middle Class, but everything to do with Nov 4th, 2008.

Posted by: TheLastVoter | October 18, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

GOP, PLEASE STOP WITH THE LIES ABOUT TAXES! USE THIS CALCULATOR TO SEE WHO WILL SAVE YOU MORE! 3 INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL FIRMS HAVE STATED THAT BARACK’S WILL HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS 3 TIMES AS MUCH AS MCCAIN’S CUTS!!! WAKE UP!
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/18/how-will-baracks-tax-cuts-help-your-family/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

“GOOGLE MCCAIN AND LIDDY !!! YOU WILL BE SHOCKED!!!!
zuq, do it for us and say that you did

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Look at the comments of the Repulicans here. It exposes their true haracter. They are worse than the talibans.

Posted by: SJ Vettom | October 18, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I am shocked at the number of bigoted people in the good ole USA? If Ayers is such a terrorist why isn’t he in jail? has he already been in jail and served his time? What about the terrorist that McCain has palled around with…. I guess it is true desperate times call for desperate means even lying~~~ I am sick of this and fearful that America is just showing true colors of division, racism, bigoted activities. How dare the RNC indicate/elude that if you do not live in a small town you are un-American—the party is becoming the poster child of American….. If you do not look like us, think like us, live like us–you are not American…. Sad but it is true…. Lynchings are not far of

Posted by: earlen | October 18, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

STOP THE LIES, BARACK’S PLAN HELPS THE WORKING CLASS. LISTEN TO THE WORDS. WORKING CLASS.

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

It was a reminder that, for all their electoral histrionics, Republicans have aligned themselves with ACORN in the past.
Indeed, in addition to the McCain photo, there is a host of examples of prominent McCain surrogates attending ACORN events, signing ACORN legislation, or complimenting the group’s efforts.
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, for example, partnered with ACORN in March 2008 for a “Homeownership Promotes The Economy” taskforce. More recently, Crist declared that — contrary to GOP outrage — he was not upset with the group’s voter registration efforts in his state. The New York Times reported that ACORN supported a law signed by Governor Crist, which “changed the rules last year to restore the voting rights of about 112,000 former convicts.”
Go here to see a photo of McCain with ACORN Members.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/17/acorn-mccain-and-gop-used-to-be-supporters/
Posted by: zuq | Oct 18, 2008 8:57:18 PM
——————-
McCAIN was the keynote speaker at ACORN’s 2006 Meeting. McCAIN said that ACORN was doing a wonderful job and that they should be proud of their efforts.

Posted by: indevoter | October 18, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

“It exposes their true haracter”
Care to reword that?

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck……lipstick on a pig thingy……yadda, yadda, yadda…………..just calling a spade a spade!!!

Posted by: tom albright | October 18, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck……lipstick on a pig thingy……yadda, yadda, yadda…………..just calling a spade a spade!!!

Posted by: tom albright | October 18, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Obama is a FRAUD!
obama = WELFARE
McCain = JOBS
VOTE SMART – VOTE McCain/Palin
We can TRUST them

Posted by: Molly | October 18, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

What the hell? Obama’s campaign gives $800K to an organization that is being investigated for voter fraud in 14 states and has been convicted of such acts in the past. Why is this OK for Dems…if it were McCain this would be all over.

Posted by: Bill | October 18, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

We are in this mess because of deregulation. Thanks John McCain. You are not a reformer. You never regulated Wall Street. I’ll never vote for a guy that has 7 homes and 13 cars! You don’t represent me!

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Earlen,
Ayers case was dropped because the feds did some shady things to catch him…That DOESN”T mean he’s innocent…it just means they can’t convict him. Plus this artical is about the tax plan and it is welfare. If you payothing in and you get something out it is welfare.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

zuq, sorry for being rude to you. Peace

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Have another hit on the bong there Brian. Using your logic, if you had the money for better weed than I do because you did all that overtime just to get the extra cash to buy the good stuff, while I prefere my part time job because it gives me more time to stay home trying to catch a buzz on the cheap stuff, you should share yours with me, just to make it equal. Let’s just all kick back and wait for someone to show up and pay our bills for us. After all, it’s only fair that everyone has exactly the same no matter how much effort they put out to get what they have. Works for me I guess, I’ll just quit my job and let the rest of you suckers take care of me.

Posted by: Socialism is good | October 18, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

nteresting read..
If you are biracial and born in a state not connected to the lower 48,
America needs darn near 2 years and 3 major speeches to ‘get to know you.’
If you’re white and from a state not connected to the lower 48, America
needs 36 minutes and 38 seconds worth of an acceptance speech to know you’re ‘one of us.’
___________________________________________________________________________
If you get 18 million people to vote for you in a national presidential
primary, you’re a ‘phony.’
Get 100,000+ people to vote you governor of the
47th most populous state in the Union, you’re ‘well loved.’
_____________________________________________________________________________
If your pastor rails against inequality in the United States of America,
you’re an ‘extremist.’
If your pastor welcomes a sermon by a member of Jews for Jesus who preaches
that the killing of Jews by terrorists is a lesson to Jews that they must convert
to Christianity, you’re a ‘fundamentalist.’
____________________________________________________________________________
If you give your wife dap on stage, it’s actually a ‘terrorist fist jab.’
If your daughter licks her palm so that she can slick down your youngest
child’s hair on national TV it’s an ‘adorable moment.’ (Seriously,
forget about abstinence only, teach these folks some grooming skills).
____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re 18, black, and impregnate a 16 year old girl, you’re a
‘registered sex offender.’
If you’re 18, white, and get a 16 year old girl pregnant ‘life happens.’
_____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a black man and you use a scholarship to get into college,
then work your way up to being the president of the Harvard Law Review,
you’re ‘uppity.’
If you’re a conservative and your parents pay your way to
Hawaii Pacific University . . . you only have four more schools to attend over
the next five years before you somehow manage to graduate (it might be five
more schools over the next five years. No one has yet verified whether or not
Palin was actually ever registered at the University of Hawaii at Hilo).
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
If you spend 18 months building a campaign around the theme of ‘Change,’
it’s just ‘empty rhetoric.’
If one week before your party’s national
convention you SUDDENLY make your candidacy about ‘Change,’ that’s ‘red meat.’
____________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified
candidates you’re a ‘token hire.’
If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more
qualified candidates you’re a ‘game changer.’
______________________________________________________________________________
If you live in an Urban area and you get a girl pregnant you’re a ‘baby
daddy.’
If you’re the same in Alaska you’re a ‘teen father.’ (Actually,
according to your own MySpace page you’re an F’n redneck that don’t want any kids,
but that’s too long a phrase for the evil liberal media to take out of
context and flog morning noon and night).
_______________________________________________________________________________
Black teen pregnancies? A ‘crisis’ in black America.
White teen pregnancies? A ‘blessed event.’
________________________________________________________________________________
If you grow up in Hawaii you’re ‘exotic.’
Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, you’re the quintessential ‘American story.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
Similarly, if you name you kid Barack you’re ‘unpatriotic..’
Name your kid Trig, you’re ‘colorful.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you’re a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fully vetting the individual you’re ‘reckless.’
A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a ‘maverick.’
_________________________________________________________________________________
If you say that for the ‘first time in my adult lifetime I’m really
proud of my country’ it makes you ‘unfit’ to be First Lady.
If you are a registered member of a fringe political group that
advocates secession that makes you ‘First Dude.’
________________________________________________________________________________
A speech given without proper citation from twenty years ago is
‘relevant information.’
A DUI from twenty years ago is ‘old news.’
___________________________________________________________________________
And, finally, if you’re a man and you decide to run for office despite
your wife’s reoccurrence of cancer you’re a ‘questionable spouse.’
If you’re a woman and you decide to run for office despite having five
kids including a newborn with Downs Syndrome… Well, we don’t know
what that is ’cause THAT’S NOT A FAIR QUESTION TO ASK!

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

100,000 – obama back to rock star gangs?
We’ll soon find out he had his corrupt Chicago gang bussed in -or – a real rock star was there first.
Obama’s tax plan is a welfare plan -
just using a new term – he is good at twisting his words.

Posted by: Jack | October 18, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

“We have to make sure that those that come behind you have the same chances”…. what exactly does this mean obama?????? Seems like we already have that “plan” – it’s called Social Security – we all WORK – have JOBS to pay for the next generation so we can all retire – one day.
STOP with the spin. Your plan is called WELFARE – anyway you spin it -
give checks to people who do NOT pay taxes – or WORK!

Posted by: Abby | October 18, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

McCain’s Strategy Revealed – Don’t believe me? Check the video!
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/15/mccains-strategy-revealed-dont-believe-me-check-the-video/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Some people at the Palin/McCain rallies are already calling for death, calling for the death of a sitting US senator.

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

FRIENDS – AYERS/WRIGHT/REZKO
FOREIGN EXPERIENCE – UNCONDITIONAL MEETING WITH AHMADINEJAD
SENATE EXPERIENCE – 100 WEEKS
ECONOMIC MESSAGE -”SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND”
POLITICAL PLATFORM -”TAXES TO FUND SOCIALISTIC WELFARE”
MIDDLE EAST – “UNDIVIDED JERUSALEM – NEXT DAY CHANGED HIS MIND”
IRAQ -”FORFEIT A VICTORY”

Posted by: OBAMA-TRACK-RECORD | October 18, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

As a republican I make just over 60K per year. Some from my job and some from an early retirement.
My taxes are too high and I am not an elitist.
But taking from the rich to give to the poor is not right.
America was built on working for a living to get ahead. Yes I sometimes wish I had more. But at least I worked for every penny I earned.
I am not on welfare and never have been.
I will always work for what I earn and never take welfare as that is the lazy way out and goes against how I was raised.
Joe the Plumber asked the question. That got the answer which will IMHO cost BHO his bid for the Presidency.
Posted by: John | Oct 18, 2008 8:48:15 PM
—————————————-
So why aren’t you complaining about bush taking money from the poor, struggling americans and the middle class to give tax cuts to corporations and the wealthy? Do you really time they need tax cuts instead you making $60,000? Or have they brainwashed you to think you should only get tax breaks when you make huge sums of money?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Heck, lets take it all the way…Mccain for Emporer ’08…Palin for God ’08!

Posted by: mooseAvenger | October 18, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Are GOP members really that stupid. Read this and tell me what you hear. It only applies to people that work!!!! McCain and his crew are the one’s that are spinning it. It’s the economy stupid! You have to work to get the cut.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden will cut taxes for 95% of working families, and provide at least three times as much tax relief for middle class families as John McCain and Sarah Palin. The Obama/Biden plan provides $1,000 of tax relief for workers and new tax benefits to help families pay for college, childcare and save for retirement.
http://barackforus.com/2008/10/18/how-will-baracks-tax-cuts-help-your-family/

Posted by: zuq | October 18, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Good Lord, the right is frothing at the mouth and has almost come unhinged. Calm down people, you are hurting yourself. Wherever this lands, we all have to live and work together. This isn’t “us” against “them.”

Posted by: arizonaguy | October 18, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

mooseAvenger, sounds like a plan!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

google obama and kenya
see the murder and terror he helped start

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

social welfare: governmental provision of economic assistance to persons in need
How is Obama’s plan not welfare? If it smells like a duck, walks like a duck…
AND, he is taking from others to ‘spread the wealth around’. They’re not cutting any of their healthcare programs, hair stylists and perks in DC. Who does he think he is to mandate this “caring attitude” by the taxpayers??

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Keep going Obama! We’re almost there! I am so proud of this country for finally seeing through the right wing rhetoric for what it is: the politics of division.

Posted by: Nevada #1 | October 18, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

google obama and chicago slum lord
see the pain he caused

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

google obama and marxist
see his real beginings
also
obama and the new party

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

That’s right – Obama’s politics of division. Take from fortunate others and give it to the not so fortunate. Why don’t they cut some government perks to give to the less fortunate? Obama is creating class warfare with his ‘plan’.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“…Obama..Health Care is a right…”
SOCIALISM IS OPRESSION
Belief that Health Care is a right is a terrific example of ‘moral relativism’ where by the consequences of ‘your beliefs’ conflict with that of ‘someone else’, me. The ‘right’ to health care, you believe exists, in reality, does not.
As so many other perceived rights bandied about by the affirmation, ‘I believe it is a right’, describes personal desires. The subject ‘is’ of a ‘moral nature’ that has ignited, once again, conflict.
The consequences of the, yours vs. mine, morality argument is ‘very real’ and ‘costly’ for many people of the opposing view. What must follow always results in ‘mandates’, ‘controls’, and ‘taking more taxes’.
‘My’ freedom of choice now diminished and ‘my’ paycheck smaller. I now have to ‘obey’ what I previously did not have to. I am now worse off than before.
I learned in college economics this one axiom; Wants and desires are never ending.
This ‘human trait’ is why our founders demanded a ‘limited government’ as ‘originally intended’ and enumerated in our rule book, the Constitution.
Why elections matter so much:
————–
Alexander Fraser Tyler, Cycle of Democracy (1770)
A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.
From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over lousy fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
The average of the world’s great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to Complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage.

Posted by: Patrick in Florida | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

100,000 – obama back to rock star gangs?
We’ll soon find out he had his corrupt Chicago gang bussed in -or – a real rock star was there first.
Obama’s tax plan is a welfare plan -
just using a new term – he is good at twisting his words.
Posted by: Jack | Oct 18, 2008 9:10:18 PM
—————————————-
I always get a chuckle when I see republicans and their supporters accuse democrats of corruption. After all, bush and cheney are so brazen with their corruption they have literally taken corruption to a new level which I’m sure will be unsirpassed for a long, long time.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

John, it is very shocking!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

google obama and hitler youth
See his Hitler style youth and their propaganda

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Alex H, you must have tremendous amounts of hate in your heart. And for all of you soothsayers claiming to know what will happen when Obama is president, where was the foresight you claim now when you voted for YOUR savior George W. Bush? Did you think we would be in the situation we are in now; worst shape ever in history?
Keep your hypotheticals to yourselves. We need a 180 degree turn from where your voting patterns have taken us. Because if what we have had is conservative I want the complete opposite of that. I don’t care if you call it liberal, socialism, communism, etc.
BTW, if you don’t like socialism, don’t call 911 or put your trash out on the street. I hope your house doesn’t catch on fire. All of the above IS socialism. And if you really want to get technical on the definition, if you answer yes to the questions below then you share something in common with a true socialist:
Do you believe that the most powerful and wealthy in our society controls the capital? Are the majority of laws written in their favor?

Posted by: JV | October 18, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

John you live in a cesspool. Your email is really a joke..

Posted by: Sharonkathleen | October 18, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

google
obama and wisconsin text book
see him as the socialist / marxist he is

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

That’s right – Obama’s politics of division. Take from fortunate others and give it to the not so fortunate. Why don’t they cut some government perks to give to the less fortunate? Obama is creating class warfare with his ‘plan’.
Posted by: msa123 | Oct 18, 2008 9:23:12 PM
—————————————-
Yeah, Robin Hood was a good for nothing bad guy too! Right?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Nothing says Christian values like complaining about the poor and trying to make sure nobody gives them a hand.
Its about time someone remembered the middle class before we ALL become the working poor. Same goes for our small businesses.
Welfare and Socialism? We already have those programs in place for our multi-million dollar corporations, thank you very much.

Posted by: Livvy | October 18, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

So when the Republicans try to mandate national discrimination against homosexuals, that’s awesome, because it’s in the Bible.
You know what else is in the Bible? Jesus instructing the people to give all their money to the poor. But that part isn’t awesome, I guess.
Either the GOP needs to abandon the Bible or embrace it, but this hypocritical halfway stuff is… well, clearly hypocritical.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

see you tube title
Sing for Change – Fuhrer Obama Hitler Youth Nazi

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

another you tube title
Obama Hitler Youth style Brainwashing

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

John, I did. Scary but funny

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Talking about WELFARE, Doesn’t Sarah Palin give all Alaskans a massive $3,200 in checks this year, man woman or child? This is about $13,000 for a family of four, working or not, tax paying or not. Sarah Palin must be a communist or at least a marxist by the Republican definition, redistributing income like that.

Posted by: plainview | October 18, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

camparison of hitler youth and obama youth singing.
you tube title,
you decide after watching
Barack Obama Hitler youth comparison

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Libs: “Tax you at a confiscatory rate so we can give it to others”
Against the commandment: “Thou shalt not steal”

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Robin Hood stole from the rich yes. However, it was the rich robber barons who STOLE from the poor through usurious TAXATION. He did not steal from the people who WORKED. Try again.

Posted by: fraggenboots | October 18, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

@people really
I am not delusional nor do I think I will not be taxed.
Taxes pay for our infrastructure, our schools, our fire departments, our police departments. And they are all in troubble because we as citizens do not demand that our representatives vote in our best interest. We just throw up our hands, call them crooks and go back to watching The Simpsons.
With the money spent on the Iraq war, we could provide universal preschool for every 3-to 4-year-old in the country, provided healthcare to every man, woman and child and increase national defense — better baggage and cargo screening, stronger measures against nuclear proliferation — could be enacted.
We could provided financing for the war in Afghanistan could be increased to beat back the Taliban’s recent gains, and a peacekeeping force could put a stop to the genocide in Darfur.
You want better government, than demand it. Stop whining about Obama being a terrorist, a Muslim, a socialist, and really start looking where your tax dollars are going.
But hey, they don’t want you to look too hard because you may find the truth. They just want to distract you with tales of the bogey man coming to burn down the house…well the house is already burning, the fire department will take 40 minutes to get there because they are undermanned, the police won’t be able to prevent looting what is left of your valuables and you won’t have enough health insurance to cover the cost of the treatment for your burns.
http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/this-could-have-been-done-with-the-money-spent-on-iraq-war/11655023/

Posted by: allheavens | October 18, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Michelle is one ugly ass, angry militant racist gorilla, dontcha think?
ugggghh, go back to Kenya b*tch!

Posted by: MONKEY HOUSE | October 18, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Giving to the poor and having it taken from you by the government is not the same.
The rich and some middle class donate to the poor and non profitrs who help them.
when they get taxed at a higher rate, that dries up

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

timely: “You know what else is in the Bible? Jesus instructing the people to give all their money to the poor. But that part isn’t awesome, I guess.”
I don’t think it teaches for the government to take it forcefully and dole it out. We have hundreds upon thousands of progams for the unfortunate… and there could be more. Instead, Obama says, let’s just take it from some and give it to others. That’s not democracy and it’s not giving and it’s not charity. It’s called stealing. But though, if he says that is what he plans to do and you give him the approval to do it, then I guess you’re condoning it. For those who would rather give to the charities of their choice and do it their own way, too bad. He wants to be a dictator and do things his way and he’s pawing his way in. And you people are falling for it.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

another you tube title
Obama Hitler Youth style Brainwashing
Posted by: John | Oct 18, 2008 9:28:53 PM
—————————————
Yet another republican fear and smear tactic.
N
ot only have the republicans bankrupt America but hey are also bankrupt of positive ideas to make America a better place.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

That’s your best argument? Really?
Cause I can hit back with something like
Repubs: “Bush doctrine”
Against the commandment: “Thou shalt not kill”
So maybe you want to come up with something better.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

timely: p.s. I guess Obama only follows the Bible when it doesn’t hurt his pocket. The Bible instructs to give 10%. Obama gave less than 5% from 2001-2005, and then 6.7% in 2006. That includes the year that he had 1.65million AGI. He’s a fraud.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

timely: that was your argument Bozo. And it sucked as an argument didn’t it?

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The Republican Party has advocated corporate welfare for more than twenty years now, and yet they CLAIM to be against “socialism.”
Give a tax cut to 95% of the American people, and Republicans whine, “Socialism!” Give a tax cut to the wealthiest 5%, and suddenly it’s “capitalism.”
The Republican Party is the party of liars and hypocrites–and it always has been.

Posted by: TFoster | October 18, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Timely? you are a personification of a
non sequitor

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

But that’s my point, msa123. Republicans want the government to mandate the Biblical “teaching” against homosexuality, but NOT the Biblical “teaching” of raising up the poor.
You cannot ask for one, but not the other, without being hypocritical. The Bible does not tell government to take money from the rich to give to the poor; you’re right. But the Bible does not tell the government to change the US constitution to discriminate against Homosexuals, either.

Posted by: Timely? | October 18, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Alex…every single Obama supporter I know has a job, contributes to society, raises their family and works their ass off to make ends meet. Shut your stupid face and stop making assumptions that you know are false and ridiculous. Being stupid, abrasive and moronic is no way to go through life kid.

Posted by: Karl | October 18, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Repukes are so desperate, they now have to throw the kitchen zink at Obama.This is so over. Its dang time the little guy gets justice. Pay your fair share of taxes like everyone else . They call themselves “”The Elite.”" I call them something else every last one of them. Anyone making millions and not paying the tax they should be,is a “”CROOK.”"

Posted by: My Name is NoBody | October 18, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

“But the Bible does not tell the government to change the US constitution to discriminate against Homosexuals, either.”
Hello? that is an anachononism

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

“But the Bible does not tell the government to change the US constitution to discriminate against Homosexuals, either.”
Hello? that is an anachronism

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

How can people who do not work get a tax cut if they do not pay taxes? Can some one explain this to me.

Posted by: George Washington | October 18, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

my name: Can you think for yourself? Did you get the ‘kitchen sink’ phrase from the news today? Oh, and $250,000 is not really “millions”. And that makes Obama is an elitist too. His wife eats lobster and caviar while in NY. In fact, her ticket for a dinner for 2 was $447. They want to pretend they’re just like you and care about you. They’re not sharing. They barely give to charity. Go figure.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I find this quite amusing. Everytime BO talks, he manages to dig himself deeper and deeper … In my book, of course. Point of fact, the AVERAGE plumber makes 35-45K per year. Yes, that is AVERAGE. Does anyone out there want to be AVERAGE? Doesn’t anyone want to have the whole kaboodle? Yes, isn’t that the American Dream? At least the one I grew up with. Being able to help others and family while being adequately rewarded for the risks and diligence for those accomplishments? Apparently, BO feels that it shouldn’t be. In fact, he wants to penalize you for being successful. According to what I read 10 years ago, a successful plumber should make at least what a successful orthopedic surgeon makes. And, tell me, do successful orthopedic surgeons make 35-45K? I don’t think so either.

Posted by: fraggenboots | October 18, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

ALEX H. most pple understand Obama tax concepts but its just sad to see that most REP dont recognise the real economic danger we are looking at this very moment,a person earning 60,000 under obama gets tax rebates of 1100plus under mccain 300plus, a person earning over 250,000 under obama gets 12plus back under mccain gets 7,000 plus now where the fairness, no obama,s right its time to share the wealth around even farmer are struggling to make ends meet no mccain is out of touch his policies are of Bush again

Posted by: willing111 | October 18, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Too funny; I guess McCains new “plan” is to scare us with the word “socialism”…oooooh noooooo….
I guess after the “terrorist” and “elitest” tags didn’t work, he thinks this one will; going around w/a bogus plumber and rounding up the good ole folksy folk who have been voting against their own economic interests for a decade. You can tell them anything and they’ll believe it because they don’t read very much and they think Faux News is real news network and don’t realize it’s owned by a billionaire with the morals of a maggot. Obama is going to win because of educated, fair minded people of this country and you should be thanking them when you get your tax cut and the economy starts blooming again. McCain protects talks a lot about the little guy, but he is doing NOTHING in his proposed policies to help them. Get educated!

Posted by: kay | October 18, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

What If? is simply a hypothesis.
It doesn’t mean its true nor factual,and certainly not based on irrefutable evidence. All you need to do
is to ask yourself the same What If?.
What If Am wrong in thinking Obama is not Qualified
What If am wrong that he’s not the best person for the job.
What If Am wrong in thinking he’s not patriotic
What if I hate him for no tangible reason.
We are Americans we always do the impossible – I never thought I’ll be so enthused about a black candidate but I am because I am an American and we do the impossible. Lets face it he’s smarter than John McCain and being American we always hire the smartest guy

Posted by: Disgruntled And Mentally Recessioned Republican | October 18, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

It is sad that ABCnews blocks many favorable comments for the McCain/Palin ticket.
When the media, such as ABCnews, ignores selected political view points, they are no longer a news agancy, but a political supporter of Obama. ABCnews should change their name to “The Obama/ABC NEWS network.
Now, I know why FOX is number one. I will not vote for Senator McCain or Obama. FOX news may lean right, but they report all the news, not select the news they broadcast. Now, I generally watch FOX, at least, they are a news agency, not an Obama supporter!

Posted by: jenkins | October 18, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

I find it so ironic and hypocritical that the McCain sheep buy his rhetoric about Obama being a socialist and yet, McCain and Bush supported a near trillion dollar bailout of wall street firms and banks along with Obama.
Please, get educated people.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

So ABC is filtering comments about Obama that point out the truth. Must be typical liberal, paid for by the Obama campaign site.

Posted by: Eyes-Wide-Open | October 18, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

plainism: I’m not stating this as my opinion. But just so you know, the Bible says homosexuality is wrong. It also says people should give with a giving heart, not grudgingly. So why would you want my money if I spit on it first? Well, maybe you wouldn’t care. I don’t know. I wouldn’t want that kind of money. Anyhow, I think that covers your argument.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Finally, we may elect a President worthy of running the free world. One who has the poise, intellect and global backing, to turn the corner on this dark period in our history.
The republicans had their chance, however, they elected and re-elected ‘W’ – that was collectively brilliant – congratulations. And now, with another stroke of brillance, they find a dude in his 70′s, who ran against ‘W’ in 2000, and the republicans felt he wasn’t good enough then – by pushing ‘W’ to the top of the ticket. Now McCain’s back? And Palin?…another stroke of genius (republicans get a standing ovation for this one). Can republicans not find any qualified, intelligent, youthful folks who may possess some measure of public speaking ability??? The Palin choice was a knee-jerk reaction to future President Obama’s convention address – you could not have created a better convention if you made it up. It scared the McBush camp to come up with a gimmick. And the jokes on … the republicans. (Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha…). Republicans vote with their wallets, and look at the destruction that has reaped. Next time find a Harvard dude or Oxford Rhodes scholar dude with charisma, like future Pres. Obama or Pres. Clinton. Otherwise, don’t bother showing up for practice, ’cause going forward you’re not getting in the game.
Guess what? There’s another part of America that will be voting with their wallet(s) come November 4th. (Potentially a very large portion of the bottom 95% of America (naturally, excluding the toothless folks in trailer parks, clinging to things…) They would rather continue the axx-whipping the they been receiving for so long. Oh well, I guess that partially explains how we ended up with ‘W’ in the first place.

Posted by: New America | October 18, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

How can people who do not work get a tax cut if they do not pay taxes? Can some one explain this to me.
Posted by: George Washington | Oct 18, 2008 9:45:04 PM
—————————————
I guess for the same reason people that do not pay taxes got a stimulus check.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Obama is an elitist Socialist. Easy for him because he has friends like Rezko to fund his housing deals and friends like Wright and Ayers to steady his anti-American stance. In Socialism, the leaders are the rich and they make everyone else equal and destroy their spirit….. btw – Obama wants to change our National Anthem, give Drivers Licenses to illegal aliens, and tax plumbers into oblivion…. can you REALLY vote for Obama???

Posted by: Bill | October 18, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude

Posted by: NOBAMA | October 18, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

msa123, there is some confusion. I never said that we should tax people for the benefit of others. You may be confusing me for someone else. I know that what I make is MINE not the governments.

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Communities take care of water processing and sewage as communities. People pay the city for water.
A lot of cities and areas do the same with electric.
Roads are taken care of with tax dollars.
Public schools are funded with tax dollars.
Elections are funded with tax dollars.
Why do you think this is?
Perhaps so that communities don’t have people with motives of their own profit handling the life blood of cities and states. Control the water, electric and you control the area. So we, as a community, undertake that ourselves.
Health care is too important to be left only to people concerned with profit. As a national community, we need to set standards, make sure that medical care is available and reasonable. Water is not only for the rich. Electricity is not only for the rich, but under McCain and the insurance industry medical care is for the rich.
John, making 60,000 a year, likely has a healthcare plan that covers a percentage or up to a point, but if there’s serious cancer, a need for a transplant, or some other expensive treatment, what choices are left? Sell everything? Die? Won’t it be better if we kept insurance companies from controlling what we have access to? Won’t it be better if we all worked together to see that everyone has access to choosing a reasonable medical coverage plan. Everyone contributes and everyone benefits.
I know that sounds a little communist if you bend it that way, but let’s not be irrational and cut off our noses to spite our face. We are all going to grow older. We are all going to have increasing risk of major illness. We all want to live as well as we can, for as long as we can.
We chose how and which products can be sold in which ways in this country, we do… through our elected officials and our laws.
As a capitalist country, with free market, we control the life giving things and see that they are not monopolized by private sources. Water, electric, roads, these are vital for being able to sell products and conduct business. Living customers don’t hurt either.
I have worked hard and raised two daughters. I currently work hard. I can’t afford health care premiums. I don’t want to die if I get sick. I’m a good person, creative and kind. I love my cat and my romantic partner. Do I deserve to die a painful death because I didn’t manage to make enough money? Do you? Why should either of us die from illness that can be cured if we work together, fund our doctors reasonably, our hospitals. It doesn’t have to be a lack of choice. It’s still America.
The fascist right wing fanatics would likely tell me that yes, if I didn’t earn enough money to save myself, I could just fall over dead. That was what I deserved for not figuring out how to sell my books better.
What they don’t see though is that if you let people die, suffer, go without basic needs then you have fewer people to sell your products to.
I like capitalism. I like being able to sell my books.
I don’t want the government to take over building trucks or publishing books or cooking crepes, breeding cats, fixing plumbing, making computers, or any other product. I do want the government to test food stuffs to make sure they’re safe and people aren’t putting melamine in products to raise the profit. China is moving more towards free market too and people will do strange things to raise profits. I want to be protected from predatory people. I don’t have a lab in my living room, after all. I want to see that people can’t price gouge for gasoline because it’s nice to make a profit and scared people will pay what they have to. I want to see that price gouging for medical care is brought to an end, because if paying for gas seems like life or death, paying for your health really is life or death.

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

I am also so sick of hearing about Obama’s middle name…what the heck is that supposed to mean? They should be investigated for their public racist chants. I wouldn’t be surprised if the KKK and Nazi groups are posting the displicable racist comments I see on all the blogs. “be a muslum; must be a terorist) I can tell because they have the logic and the writing ability of third graders. Can you imagine in this day and age, trash like that still exists. Incredible.
OBAMA/BIDEN 08….I see a LANDSLIDE!!

Posted by: kay | October 18, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Yes, Obama will gain everyone’s faith in him, then squash their spirit. What’s the point if what you earn past a certain point then it is taken away? The man is a dreamer and a fool. I saw how the Harvard grads did that were running Fannie, Freddie, and the others. Good schools mean nothing. They’re just better at being thugs and smiling at us.

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

On you tube , children are singing pro-Obama songs – “He will change it, and re-arrange it”. Both Soviet Union and Hitler used kids for propaganda purposes. Obama first was brainwashed by people like Rev. Right. Now he is brainwashing you. Congraz, America we have been duped.

Posted by: Propaganda | October 18, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

See this you tube video,
must watch whole thing.
Barack Obama & Raila Odinga

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

my apologies plainism. my mistake. Thanks for letting me know

Posted by: msa123 | October 18, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

msa123, you are absolved and forgiven. N’est pas grave. not serious

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

I bet most people claiming Obama being a socialist, including McCain, don’t even know what socialism actually is. I guarantee most people equate it with communism. Ignorance.
Quick — to Google to find the definition so you can sound intelligent in your response.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

check out this you tub video
it is true and factual
Great expectation in our Muslim brother obama Gadafi

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

FixtheBroken (could that be autobiographical?) just kidding
Socialism is the economic system whereby Communism is employed as a governmental structure

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Obama says he will cut health care costs by $2,500,really???, How the hell is he gonna accomplish this??, It will Never happen in 4-8 yrs of a 2 term president, If American had any Sense in them, They will take Mccains idea Now.

Posted by: aden | October 18, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The top 5% of the workers in this country starts at the $160,000 income level. The Dept of Labor has the numbers to prove this. There are numerous couples and businesses, about 50.1% are in that category. If Obama would pass this tax plan, the majority of working America would get a “tax hike”. Obama is in reality, “spreading the wealth” around.
Ralph Nader is a better choice than Obama!

Posted by: Willie | October 18, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day,
the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers, he
said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks
for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they
divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would
each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested
that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100%
savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before and the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
‘I only got a dollar out of the $20′, declared the sixth man. He
pointed to the tenth man,’ but he got $10!’
‘Yeah, that’s right’, exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!’
‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get $10
back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!’
‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We
didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!’
The nine men then surrounded the tenth man and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the
nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay
the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough
money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat
friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

Posted by: WHY OBAMA IS WRONG FOR US | October 18, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Plainsm,
It actually might be autobiographical if indeed McCain wins this election.
Anyway, please tell me, how the near trillion dollar bill that McCain, Bush and Obama supported is not a sign of socialistic tendencies. And as such, McCain would be considered a socialist too. Sounds ridiculous doesn’t it. McCain a socialist — well, the same ridiculousness can be applied to Obama being a socialist.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Don’t usually watch SNL, but Tina Fey was very decent to Gov. Sarah Palin last night on Letterman

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Just wait untill the Messiah drops the bad news on his faithfull flock that he really had intended to mean what he said about 250,000 being the point at which you became “wealthy” but it seems there has been a small “change” in plans. Unforseen circumstances have made necessary some small revisions, and from here forward, anyone earning over 50,000 per year is hearby declaired to be “rich” and therefore should be subject to public scorn and ridicule. Oh yeah, and taxed accordingly. 40% outta just about cover it. For now. Some of you are in for such a surprise if you really believe what ANY politician tells you. It’s amazing how every four years how gullable the voting public becomes. Simply fascinating.

Posted by: Bow down | October 18, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

you tube title
EVIDENCE FOUND!!! Clinton administration’s “BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION” They forced banks to make BAD LOANS and ACORN and Obama’s tie to all of it!!!

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

There is so much garbage being posted. Since we are quoting the Bible here – “Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone” – for those saying homosexuality is a sin and abortion is murder and is a sin, well McCain’s lies and smear campaigns are also sins. The thing is – Someone having an abortion or being homosexual is a personal choice – McCain’s lies and smears affects not only the Obama family, but all Americans. It is our moral obligation to care for our fellow citizens. All MCain and Palin care about is their own political aspirations. They do not put America first or they would not run a smear and lie campaign. We have an opportunity to elect a honest African American man to be President of our great country and all the Republicans can do is smear him. I am a white middle class woman and I am proud to say that I am voting for Obama.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

more you tube video
fact
OBAMA CAUGHT SAYING ACORN AND FRIENDS WILL SHAPE HIS PRESIDENTIAL AGENDA

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Why are anti Obama statements always uniformed, uneducated or the crying wealthy few who are so afraid of paying their fair share? They make stuff up, like Faux News and call it fact. They have nothing but hatred and warped logic in their arguments. If their arguments fail, which they always do, then they resort to lies and rumors that can be fact checked in two seconds on line. Thanks for coming out; thanks for being so pathetic and blantantly dishonest. Your lies and hate are the reason this election will be a landslide. McCain is not just going to lose; he is going to lose big time. Because no. 1) he has a lousy plan that helps the rich and screws the middle class; 2) he still believes going into Iraq was a good idea; 3) he has no clue about the economy and 4) he’s run the most dispicable campaign I’ve ever seen and 5) having Palin as 2nd in command is a national embarrassment; not to mention terrifying to most Americans.
OBAMA/BIDEN 08!!

Posted by: kay | October 18, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Keep posting phantom video John. It is working very well.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Both Communists and Hitler came to power on a platform of Change. Obama’s brand of change will be slightly different. After all, he was brainwashed for 20+ years by his spiritual adviser with anti-American, anti-white, and anti-simitic hate.
Yes, Obama will bring change, but not the change most of pro-Obama voters are hoping for.

Posted by: Platform of Change | October 18, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I am a lifelong Democrat but for the first time I will be voting Republican. I cannot vote for Obama who is totally unqualified to be President. He has no experience or accomplishments, has poor judgment, has dangerous, racist, anti-American,anti-Semitic close friends, spiritual advisors, and close associates, has a socialist, far-left, radical agenda and wants the government to run everything which will destroy our economy. He is involved with the most massive voter registration and voter fraud in American history. He gave $800,000 to Acorn which has been involved in illegal activities regarding voter fraud in over a dozen states. He was their lawyer and pressured banks to make high-risk loans and to give mortgages to unqualified people. I urge everyone to read “The Case Against Barack Obama” by David Freddoso before you vote for Obama. Freddoso documents everything and proves why Obama is not qualified to be President and could be dangerous for the country.

Posted by: Concernedvoter | October 18, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

another you tube video
ACORN Obama and the Bailout
These videos are C-Span and CNN not just Fox

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

FixTheBroken, keep posting your name as well, it gives us insight into your autobiography

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Everyone should call or write to their Senators and Congressmen demanding that immediate legislation be passed to require voters to prove their identity and proof of full-time residence before they go into the voting booth. I did this last week. Obama is going to pull off the biggest voter registration fraud and voter fraud in history. He has a direct and close relationship with Acorn, since he was their lawyer and pressured banks to relax requirements for mortgages and force the banks to give high-risk loans to people who were not qualified. He donated over $800,000 to Acorn. Considering that he has dangerous, racist, anti-American, and anti-Semitic close associations, friends, spiritual advisors, we cannot trust this man in the White House.
Read the book “The Case Against Barack Obama” by David Freddoso. He documents everything about Obama’s aversion to reform, the extremely dirty politics he employed in his successful race for state senator of Illinois and his successful race for U.S. Senator, his radical, socialist, ultra-left agenda and the dangerous people who influenced him, his close relationship to Rev. Wright, Rev. Pfleger, Ayers, Reczko, etc., his lack of knowledge and understanding bout basic foreign policy and total lack of experience and uncertainty about foreign affairs, and especially, how he takes care of friends by buying their support.

Posted by: Concernedvoter | October 18, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

ConcernedVoter, you are not a lifelong democrat. Please have some integrity. And, by the way, stop saying voter fraud — there was some voter registration problems that ACORN has already brought to the attention of the proper authorities. They are actually very open in their work. Please get educated and stop listening to right wing talking points you REPUBLICAN!

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

more you tube c span video
title
Shocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Plainsm said:
“FixTheBroken, keep posting your name as well, it gives us insight into your autobiography”
As one who can admit mistakes and not understanding something, can you indulge me in explaining what you mean by that statement — what do you mean?

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Tina Fey: “She’s pageant material”

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Dear Concernedvoter,
I agree with you, I was also a democrat for 20+ years, but the democratic party has moved so far to the left that it is hardly recognizable. Too bad. When Obama finally grabs the white house, it will be all over for this great country.

Posted by: LostDemocracy | October 18, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I just returned from this rally. The crowd estimate of 100,000 is low – more like 200,000 were in attendance.
Posted by Mickey
————————————-
Mickey Mouse- Yeah, hundreds of thousands of “SHEEP” attend “Marxist rallies” in Cuba and North Korea, too.
I get a sence of creepiness every time I hear about Messiah Obama’s rallies. I can not stop thinking that perhaps the October Surprise in our country (That One calls it “Change We Need”) is in fact… an “October [Communist] Revolution”
AMERICA DO NOT VOTE FOR MARXIST OBAMA.
Posted by: Natasha | Oct 18, 2008 7:22:16 PM
—————————————
Likewise for Palin the Pagan.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

The c span videos prove that the Democrats had a big hand in this mess.
Also voter registration fraud has been proven in one state. ACORN paid them to buy registrations.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The c span videos prove that the Democrats had a big hand in this mess.
Also voter registration fraud has been proven in one state. ACORN paid them to buy registrations.

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

LostDemocracy,
The Democratic party has not gone too far left. And with the pick of Sarah Palin by McCain — and it is irrefutable that she is an extreme right wing conservative — how could justify that?
I may have voted for McCain had he picked Ridge or someone like that.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

John, the truth will get out. Pray to God that it gets out sooner rather than later.

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Concerned voter – get your facts straight. The biggest voter fraud was in 2000 when Gore won but Bush was elected. Florida screwed up the election with their fraud and blocking of votes being counted. We have to prevent McCain from commiting the same fraud tactics. There is no reason to fear Obama. The Republican’s filthy lies are that – LIES. Obama will be president fairly.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

MORE YOU TUBE VIDEO
Obama, The SLUM LORD

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Fox News A network owned by an Australian called Reupert Murdoch!
This clown’s modus operandi is to whip up hatred and division – check out his other media networks in europe. they are all rightwing anti-foreigner. The irony here is Rupert Murdoch himself is a foreigner!!

Posted by: Disgruntled And Mentally Recessioned Republican | October 18, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

MORE PROOF ON YOU TUBE
BUSTED! Voter Registration Fraud Admission!

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

MORE PROOF ON YOU TUBE
BUSTED! Voter Registration Fraud Admission!

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Bush’s tax cuts gave the wealthy a larger tax break. Why is it wrong to give the middle class a break this time?
Obama’s record breaking rally crowd of 100,000 in St. Louis was followed a few hours later by over 75,000 in Kansas City, Missouri.
Obama is going to turn Missouri blue.

Posted by: Julie | October 18, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Call it what you will Obama, taxing me more to give your hood rats and women with 6 kids and 5 different baby daddys (who don’t support them) is welfare. If Obama gets elected there will be a huge class warfare, and lots of middle class people will merely quit their jobs and join the ranks of the welfare rolls, instead of working to pay for them.
Posted by: nobama | Oct 18, 2008 4:28:30 PM
—————————————
Sounds like you’re describibg Sarah Palin and her family, including her pregnant teen daughter abd her boyfriend. How ironic.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

I am concerned about Obama being a non-natural born citizen or possibly an illegal alien. It is in the Constitution that to be president, you must be a natural born citizen.
The active lawsuit, in Federal Court, case number: 08-cv- 04083
Why wont Obama produce his:
1. “vault” version (certified copy of his “original” long version)
Birth Certificate
2. A certified copy of Certification of Citizenship;
3. A Certified copy of Oath of Allegiance.
Why won’t Obama produce these documents, as ordered by the federal judge?
Does he have something to hide?
We are waiting, no documents, no vote!

Posted by: Bruce | October 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Julie, not where I live, its going red

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Abortion is a personal choice? Senator Obama supports abortion on demand, anytime, any place, at any term of the pregnancy. That’s not a lie, that’s not a smear, that is a fact. Get some perspective, lady.

Posted by: jacrac | October 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Can I ask anyone with any integrity to answer this question? I will ask it again…
You all claim that Obama is a socialist. Fine.
Please tell me how McCain is not a socialist given he approved the bailout of AIG and voted for the near trillion dollar wall street and bank bailout?
All I ask is some integrity in your answer.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Bruce,
McCain was born near the Panama Canal. He can’t run for President.
Do you see how stupid you sound with your questions?
Please show integrity and intelligence.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Abortion is a personal choice? Senator Obama supports abortion on demand, anytime, any place, at any term of the pregnancy. That’s not a lie, that’s not a smear, that is a fact. Get some perspective, lady.
Posted by: jacrac | Oct 18, 2008 10:24:40 PM
Very correct: a personal choice that destroys a LIFE

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” – Joseph Stalin
OBAMA = ACORN = VOTER FRAUD

Posted by: Obama = Acorn | October 18, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Rupert Murdoch and his Fox News media outlet feeds you bs and being unintelligent and stupid you lap it up like a dog and he laughs all the way to the bank!!
WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WISE UP!! and stop yourself being fed all that crap!!

Posted by: Disgruntled And Mentally Recessioned Republican | October 18, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

jacrac,
Get your facts straight about abortion. He supports a woman to choose an abortion. He has publicly stated that he is personally against abortion. Stop spreading propaganda. I ask you please to not do that.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Obama: “I’m personally against abortion but want to decrease the incidence of it”
WHAT A PONTIUS PILATE ANSWER!!!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

To all you anti-abortion honks:
Reconcile the following:
1. Is a rapist allowed to choose the mother of his child?
2. Is it OK with you “pro-life” people if a pregnant mother who gets killed by a bomb, gunfire or other mechanism in a war she did want waged?

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

HEY REPUBLICANS!!!
WHAT DO YOU CALL THAT STIMULUS CHECK THAT YOU RECEIVED THIS YEAR????
WELFARE CHECK!!!
LOL!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Any bets on when the Obamabots start the drive to overturn the two term limit so that the Messiah can reign forever?

Posted by: Who needs the Constitution | October 18, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

sisterdearest09, you are free to mail your check to the Treasury Dept

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Republicans always cry “socialist’ when government policies benefit the poor and needy, but not the rich. While at the same time the rich receive the lion’s share of federal largess. For example they take for granted the homeowner’s tax deduction on mortgage interest. Why should the Fed give a person who has a million dollar mortgage a tax break? Why should I as a homeowner with NO MORTGAGE, or a renter, have to SUBSIDIZE a rich person with a million dollar mortgage. Isn’t that WELFARE for the rich? Most Republicans are patriotic supporters of our armed forces. But US military personnel live and work within a SOCIALIST system, with subsidized housing, subsidized food, subsidized health care, and generous pensions. If it’s good enough for the troops, why not everyone? Of course the greatest beneficiaries of federal largess are US multi-national corporations who can hire the best tax lawyers in the land so that they pay NO TAXES AT ALL! Sounds like CORPORATE WELFARE to me. The most bloated, bureaucratic, inefficient, wasteful organization in this land is the Pentagon. Their budget has DOUBLED in the last eight years from $350 billion to $700 billion. The US spends as much on it’s military as the REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED! Are you safer for that? NO! Our much vaunted military could only get ONE ARMED FIGHTER IN THE AIR on Sept. 11, 2001, and that one fighter was TOO LATE. The US military is so incompetent that we would certainly be safer without one. If Reagan had not sent billions to Afghanistan between 1980 and 1988 to recruit, train, and arm Muslim militants, al Qaeda would NEVER HAVE EXISTED. Our invasion and occupation of Iraq has cost nearly one trillion dollars and all we have acheived is to GIVE ALL OF SOUTHERN IRAQ (including it’s oil fields) TO IRAN. McCain can blather all he likes about “winning” in IRAQ, but the fact is AMERICA HAS LOST IRAQ. Way to go BUSH!

Posted by: AtlantaDem | October 18, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Of course McCain’s not interested in tax rates for the wealthy reverting to their pre-2002 levels: That would mean he and his wife (who made $4.2 million this year) would have to pay more taxes.
McCain (and most of his supporters) are so ignorant they apparently have no idea how our tax system is (and has always been set up). There’ve always been groups of people who pay higher tax rates than others. Doh! All of a sudden these republican idiots are outraged? What a bunch of morons.

Posted by: Jake | October 18, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Who needs the Constitution,
No. I respect the United States Constitution. Two-terms is enough. In fact, I would support a one term only presidency of 6 years.
I bet you loved that FISA bill that was passed, huh? I hate that Obama voted for that.
You see, as an Independent, I have noticed lately, that the Democrats are actually more caring of the Constitution than Republicans. And that is a fact.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Why do republicans hate struggling Americans, the middle class and the poor?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

I have perspective – abortion is a personal choice – it is not up to you or anybody else if a woman chooses to have an abortion. I know women who have had abortions and it is a very difficult decision. However, if you are raped or a victim of incest you have already suffered enough and should not be forced to carry this baby. How can you support the death penalty if you can’t support abortion for a woman who was violated? Get your facts straight and have some compassion for others who have been victimized.
And to Bruce – Obama is a U.S. citizen and he has provided his birth certificate. He was born in Hawaii which is one of the 50 states – study your geography if you are that stupide. Mccain was born in Panama – not the U.S.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Seriously Alex … enough with the Hussein crap. Ignorance like yours is pretty sad.

Posted by: kennedyDC | October 18, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Jake, what is your language, I don’t recognize an English word “Doh”

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

FixThebroken,
There are already laws that support a woman’s right to choose. Why does Obama have to take such an extreme position? Is it propaganda that he supports the Freedom of Choice Act, which is basically abortion on demand? Don’t you think the provisions in this bill are extreme? And Obama wants to use my tax dollars to pay for this. Not propaganda!

Posted by: jacrac | October 18, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Goodness.. I’m an American citizen. I have a birth certificate. It looks like Obama’s give or take. I don’t have a certificate of citizenship or an oath of aligence. McCarthy isn’t running things now. Obama is a natural born citizen. Why would he have a certificate of citzenship? Do you have one?

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

FixtheBroken (unedifying screen name)
“There are already laws that support a woman’s right to choose.”
CHOOSE WHAT? THE DEATH OF A CHILD???!!!

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

FUNNY YOU TUBE VIDEO
REALLY NOT FUNNY
The Lies and Babblings of Obama

Posted by: John | October 18, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Nix, as a matter of fact I do have a birth certificate. What “legal” American does not?

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

What good is a tax cut if you don’t have a job??
Obama’s corporate tax increases will force companies to either pass on the tax increase on to US or it will force companies to lay off people.
Obama’s capital gains increase will cost EVERY RESPONSIBLE tax payer. If you save for retirement or your child’s college or a down payment for a home…you will be punished for doing the smart thing…SAVING.
Obama has GUARANTEED that he will sign a Universal Health Plan by the end of his first term (NEA Sept. issue)…how is he going to pay for it??? We can’t even afford Medicare or Medicaid!!
Pelosi wants to spend another 150 billion…with NO WAY to pay for it (the windfall tax is NOT going to pay for it…oil has dropped from $143 to 69…where is the windfall??)
Finally…how can you give a “tax cut” to people who DON’T PAY TAXES?…that is called WELFARE…how does rewarding low income people encourage them to improve their lives? Money for nothing…yeah that makes people strive for improvement!
What option is going to create jobs? Giving low income money a small amount of money to buy hamburgers and flat screen TV’s (made in China!) or giving large companies a tax cut for adding Research Development staff (new engineer jobs) or additional Advertisements.

Posted by: MikeFromNJ | October 18, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

As a fellow Independent, I most respectfully dis-agree. There isn’t anything about either of the two “major” parties that show anything closely resembling “respect” for the Constitution. Your saying that makes me seriously doubt your are truely as “Independent” as you claim. If people really wanted change, they would vote for anything besides the Demos or Repubs. Both parties are corrupt beyond saving, and unless we get a third or fourth choice in the future, we are screwed. And that is a fact as well. You can say you read it first here when time proves me right.

Posted by: Who needs the Constitution | October 18, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

jacrac,
I am going to try to have an intelligent conversation with you (hopefully not at my own peril). All FOCA basically wants to do is make it permanent law that a woman may choose an abortion. Look at this way — there are people pushing to get a federal amendment to the constitution to ban gay marriage. I am not sure FOCA goes that far.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

plainsm,
Reconcile the following:
1. Is a rapist allowed to choose the mother of his child?
2. Is it OK with you “pro-life” people if a pregnant mother who gets killed by a bomb, gunfire or other mechanism in a war she did want waged?

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Senator Obama:
1.) Where is your original certified Birth Certificate?
2.) Where are your Occidental College records?
3.) Where are your Columbia records?
4.) Where is your Senior Thesis?
5.) Where are your Harvard records?
6.) Where are any papers you wrote for the Harvard Law Review?
7.) Where are your Illinois Senate Records, both official and personal?
8.) Do you hold dual citizenship, or were you ever a citizen of another country, and if so, are you a naturalized citizen of the United States?
9.) Why haven’t your medical records been released?
10.) Why have you AND the DNC filed a Joint Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery in the case of Berg v. Obama (08-cv-04083)? No, I am not going to ask about THAT OTHER LAWSUIT, but you know which one it is.
If your are a citizen, cooperate with the courts and produce your original Birth Certificate, Certification of Citizenship and Oath of Allegiance.
Cooperate with the Federal Judge or lose our votes.

Posted by: Pauline | October 18, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

It’s amazing to me that anyone would ever believe a Democrat on cutting taxes. It just doesn’t happen and actually it won’t. Put the cool-aid down people. The messiah is not telling you the whole story. Read the specifics and you’ll see it’s all about parsing the words. It’s why we need to throw out all the lieyers in Washington not let them control the White House, Senate and House. Move away from your remote control and read the following if you really want to learn about the specifics on the Obama 95%: http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/16/searching-for-obamas-95-percen

Posted by: freemort | October 18, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

sisterdearest09, you are free to mail your check to the Treasury Dept
Posted by: plainsm | Oct 18, 2008 10:33:30 PM
***************************
MAD YOU DIDN’T RECEIVE A STIMULUS CHECK FROM DADDY BUSH??
That is what happen to YOU!!!
LOL!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Thanks Kay that pretty much sums it up.

Posted by: George Washington | October 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Who needs the Constitution,
I voted for Perot, Clinton, McCain in the 2000 Republican primary, Kerry and now I am voting for Obama. If, like the Green party wants, our electoral system gets changed such that we can have a run-off type election system, I may vote other ways.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

FixtheBroken, you seem to be a decent individual, so why are you pushing FOCA that will reinforce the daily American Holocaust, i.e. abortion????

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Spread the Wealth Around = Socialism
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the uneven division of blessings, while the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal division of misery.”
I guess, Joe the Plumber gets this.

Posted by: Joe The Plumber | October 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

“For every hard-working American: be afraid, be very afraid of hussein’s plans to socialize America. Reject this shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, drug-addicted, elitist, narcissistic, flip-flopping gas-bag who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes. Instead, vote for somebody who will reform the Washington mess – instead of making it an even more horrific monster. –Alex H”
These kind of remarks are so hateful and vile I can’t believe they are allowed on this site. I guess that is why we have the 1st Ammendment (try as the current administration would like to bypass the entire constitution.)
However, the “righties” like to forget the past sins (drug use, alcoholism,and worse) of the current POTUS and the apparent lack of stability (womanizing, anger)and ethics violations of the GOP candidates so there are some serious isues on that side of the aisle. How can someone reform what he has agreed with 90% of the time, by his own admission?
Also, if you recall, the socialism really started when Paulson and Bush proposed the deal to bailout Wall St and nationalize the banks. Everyone agreed it was not the best deal, but needed to help the economy. Of course the GOP needed more PORK to agree, even though McCain was for the first plan.
“Spreading the wealth” simply means that if those that have more pay more taxes (5% of TAXPAYERS) it takes some of the strain off the people who have been crapped on by the GOP since, I don’t know, forever.
Everyone should know that the POTUS cannot just put their entire platform into practice. That is why there are checks and balances and the two houses of congress. (Change the national anthem, are you serious?)
The “right” claims to be Christian, well, I have been a Christian my entire life, and Jesus spoke of giving to the poor. The rich man will never get into the kingdom of heaven; you cannot serve both money and the Lord. How can they justify the position of constantly helping the rich get richer and screw the rest of us?
I am not wealthy by any stretch but make a good living, and my husband, college-student son and I are all very hard-working. We don’t have a problem with helping out those in need. Some narrow-minded folks think that people are poor because they choose to be. Who would choose to be? Not all poor people are on drugs, need welfare, or refuse to work. But it must be easier on the conscience to assume that they are.
There is a lot of hate out there, and there will be a lot of healing that needs to be done regardless of who wins in 2 weeks. I pray that there will be.

Posted by: Show-Me Mom | October 18, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

plainsm: Obama has a birth certificate too. I mean, do you have a ‘certificate of citizenship’? Or an ‘oath of allegiance’?

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Pauline,
Get real – all of these things have been investigated and provided as necessary. Not everything has to be published on a blog or on the far wing Fox news lying station. What about Palin being held accountable for violating ethical rules? If you violated ethic rules at your job you would be fired (or at least should be). McCain spews lies and changes his story every day.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

McCain divorced his wife for his mistress because she was in a wheel chair. Then a few months ago he pushes a wheel chair person into a wall because the person asked a question McCain did not like. How Ironic! de ja vue the twenty year itch hits McCain again the Keating Five scandal has a trickle down to our current finacial melt down. It started twenty years ago with McCain and his new wife. Don’t believe it? It is true. We are living the last leg of the McCain/Keating scandals. It just took all this time to come to a head. McCains deregulation binge that started all this mess should not be rewarded. That isn’t factoring in his VP choice. It’s like making a omlet and having all the ingredients in the bowl and you forget to crack the egg over a seprate dish to make sure it is fresh and not rotten. But instead you figure, oh! why check…. only to find out the egg is rotten and you have to start over. I thing we are looking for sound judgement not a rotten egg omlet.

Posted by: Ebinezer | October 18, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Nix, the Berg case disputes the authenticity and of his birth certificate due to the timing of his birth

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

plainsm,
First, reconcile the following:
1. Is a rapist allowed to choose the mother of his child?
2. Is it OK with you “pro-life” people if a pregnant mother who gets killed by a bomb, gunfire or other mechanism in a war she did want waged.
Secondly, I am not necessarily pushing FOCA. Your view is extreme to the max. No one is pro-abortion. If we can get a real policy in place that actually takes abortion seriously, I guarantee you that they could be reduced by 50-80% within 10 years. But all we do in this country is argue about whether they should be legal or not, but we actually don’t try to solve the problem.

Posted by: FixTheBroken | October 18, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

For the last 8 years Republicans have screwed americans and our great nation. So the want to divert your attention from that to Abortion, Acorn, Ayers, Anything except how they have F’ded up and ruined our country. But somehow they want us to believe that Obama is riskier? Give me a F’ing break!

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

FixtheBroken, I deal in reality not in hypotheticals just asserted. A child of a rape victim is a child too.
St. Martin de Porres was a son of an illegitimate mother. See this link:
http://www.martindeporres.org/about.htm

Posted by: plainsm | October 18, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

According to my friends I have “thrown away” my vote for a long time now. But in my opinion voting for either of the offerings from the Repubs or Demos has been the real throwing away of peoples votes for a long time now. The founding fathers didn’t like the idea of political parties to start with. Only having two truely viable ones pretty much assures that they will just take turns raping the country, and keeping the public relatively evenly divided over the two, assures they both get their turns to be first. Partisan politics will be the real downfall of our Republic. I hope I don’t live long enough to see I’m right.

Posted by: Who needs the Constitution | October 18, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I believe he’s an American citizen and any law suits As president he will not be acting like a king, like Mr. Bush has. Obama will build concensus and help all of us do better because we are the heart of his plan. We, the America People, are what will make our country better. Electing Obama is electing democracy again. I very much want that. There has been so much fear and falsehoods put out, but I saw John McCain, live, say, “You don’t have to be afraid of Obama as your president.” He also said, “He’s a good man. He’s a family man.” John McCain, I don’t think he wants everyone to be so afraid either. McCain should have been an indpenedent or a Democrat.

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

GET READY TO LOL PALIN ON SNL!!!!
TONIGHT!!!
NOV. 4TH = OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 18, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

FixTheBroken,
Likewise, I am trying to have an intelligent conversation with you. Setting aside rape, incest, and health of mother, I understand the implications of the FOCA: unlimited abortion, late term abortions, partial birth abortions, abortions because you don’t like the sex of your child. In addition, my teenage daughter, who has to have a signed medical slip to take aspirin at school, can have a medical procedure without my consent. FOCA = PRO-ABORTION. If Obama supports FOCA, then he is pro-abortion also. With regards to war in this discussion, 45,000,000 babies have been aborted, many of those african american.

Posted by: jacrac | October 18, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I don’t see Obama raising taxes on the middle class. I don’t see why this is an issue in either case, taxes are about 5% of our problems in this nation…and nothing compared to what we pay at the pump and for food. McCain said he’ll veto the first earmarked bill that comes across his desk, yet he just voted for a plan to bail out wall street, not the middle class, the high paid CEO’s…the source of our problems. He calls tax cuts on WORKING people a welfare check, yet we the taxpayers have been giving the rich a “welfare” check for 8 years. I’m sorry, the GOP had their chance, i’m voting blue for president…i might choose a couple republicans for our governor and local positions, but not for President…my better judgment just says it would be a mistake to vote for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

McCain keeps flip flopping and avoiding the issues, he’s attacking with the use of flat out lies, he’s trying to use fear to mislead america…sound familiar? If he somehow wins, the war in Iraq will never end and the economy will get worst, even my oldest child can see that. The middle class will be wiped out.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

It is so exciting to smell the fear of the right-wingnuts. I am from the metro St. Louis area and I can tell you here and now that Obama will win in Missouri – the crowds at the St. Louis Arch were reported as 100,000 but that is not close. The crowds were bigger than for any event I have been at – my estimate and those of people in the area are much higher. It just proves that we are sick and tired of being sick and tired and poor in this country because of the repukelicans and McLame and Pain and their supporters. Go crawl back into your caves. The party is over for you.
posted by: durrs
*****************
Hey Durrs,
My Brother in-law, is a very staunch supporter of
the RNC and McCain. He is a very well known
banker in Missouri, and sponsored McCain at
several fund raiser events giving him thousands
for his organization.
When he had to make a personal trip back here,
we met up with him. He seemed quite jittery about
the McCain campaign, and he seemed to be
rambling as if McCain was loosing track of the
republican message. When I mentioned Bush, He
rolled his eyes and wouldn’t even recognize his
position as being President, saying that Bush went
whacky.

Posted by: spacerook1 | October 18, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Obama is surely conceited…according to the Record newspaper…Obama’s presidential “transition team” is ALREADY MEETING…talk about being cocky. I didn’t vote for him yet and he is already planning on which lobbyists he is going to reward with government White House jobs!!
I don’t like that he thinks America has no other option.

Posted by: mike | October 18, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Obama thinks Americans are fools!
If you give money to people who dont pay any taxes, then it is WELFARE!
For a so called brilliant lawyer, Obama looks like a blithering idiot.

Posted by: Gregh | October 18, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Mike, McCain’s campaign is funded by nothing but lobbyists, where Obama’s is funded by mostly donations. And the white house job is not a reward, it’s a job. If Obama runs our nation half as good as he runs his campaign(unlike McCain), the nation will be just fine.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

For every hard-working American: be afraid, be very afraid of hussein’s plans to socialize America. Reject this shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, drug-addicted, elitist, narcissistic, flip-flopping gas-bag who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes.
Posted by: ALEX H.
**************************
Now Alex, you really shouldn’t talk like this about
President Bush. We all know he has these traits.

Posted by: spacerook1 | October 18, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Video: Obama Admits He Supports Marxism
The Obama-KGB-Squad has removed the following video of Obama’s interview with Bill O’Reilly, during which Obama admitted that he supports Marxism. However the text is still available.
Karl Marx, author of The Communist Manifesto, penned the recap of his basic economic philosophy below:
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”
Barack Obama, in an interview with Bill O’Reilly on Fox News, admits that he shares the above Marxist economic theory. Watch this (5:47 into the clip, but watch the whole clip):
http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=550
“If am sittin’ pretty, and you’ve got a waitress who is making minimum wage plus tips, and I can afford it and she can’t, what’s the big deal for me to say I’m going to pay a little bit more… that is neighborliness”
No Senator, that is Marxism. What kind of dementia makes these liberal Marxists think they have the right to tell someone else, another free human being, how much money they should or should not have? It’s none of your damn business Barack… but the hell out!
And some of you thought I was exaggerating when I said this clown was a Marxist…
http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=550

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Well I guess that means that Bush has put rich CEO’s on wall street on welfare and mccain is about to do the same. They have more tax cuts than any small business, than any family…only difference is, the rich don’t need it.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

The country is in crisis right now. If we’re lucky, McCain is also putting together his team to assume responsibilities, in the off chance that he wins. Both of the need to be ready. That’s called being responsible and a good leader.

Posted by: Nix | October 18, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Wake Up and smell the coffee.. 100,000 gathering in a rally. People are looking for CHANGE, for new plans and new direction. Obama is the only candidate right now that can deliver that. Obama’s plan for CHANGE. McCain plans for “fear tactics”. what a shame.

Posted by: bluespike | October 18, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Wake Up and smell the coffee.. 100,000 gathering in a rally. People are looking for CHANGE, for new plans and new direction. Obama is the only candidate right now that can deliver that. Obama’s plan for CHANGE. McCain plans for “fear tactics”. what a shame.

Posted by: bluespike | October 18, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

All i’ve seen so far is smear attacks in this forum. using terms like Hussein, welfare checks for WORKING americans, non-american, acorn, ayers, things that are simply NOT TRUE. I sense desperation and lies.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

PHILIP J. BERG v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA – Complaint
U.S.D.C. – E.D. PA ^ | 08/22/2008 | Philip J. Berg
Posted on Friday, August 22, 2008 11:51:22 AM by Diamond
>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE
>
VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a1k/a
BARRY SOETORO, a1k/a
BARRY OBAMA, a1k/a JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a
BARRY DUNHAM, THE
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL
COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL
ELECTION COMMISSION AND
DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE
>
Defendants
>
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARTORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states in particular part, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Furthermore, all Presidents since and including Martin Van Buren were born in the United States subsequent to the Declaration of Independence.
“The general doctrine of our Constitution is, that the executive power of the nation is vested in the President; subject only to the exceptions and qualifications, which are expressed in the instrument.” 7 Works of Alexander Hamilton, J. C. Hamilton ed. (New
Z:\FO RM S\Obama Complainl.doc
York: 1851), 76, 80-81 (emphasis in original), U.S. Constitution, Article II (Hamilton
and Madison.)
Obama is a representative of the Democratic People. However, the Obama must meet the Qualifications specified for the United States Office of the President, which is he must be a “natural born” citizen. Unfortunately, Obama is not a “natural born” citizen. Just to name one of the problems, Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen and relocated herself and Obama to Indonesia wherein Obama’s mother naturalized in Indonesia and Obama followed her naturalization, as he was a minor and in the custody of his mother. Obama failed to take the oath of allegiance when he turned eighteen (18) years to regain his United States Citizenship status.
The Democratic National Committee is for Plaintiff and “We the People” who believe in the Democratic Vision. The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent the Democratic Americans in seeking honest leadership, Open Government, Real Security, Energy Independence, Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare System that works for Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing personal liberties for all. Of which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution.
The actions of Obama, a U.S. Senator, in running for President of the United States, knowing he is not eligible, have been taken entirely without authorization under the
United States Constitution, completely ignoring the qualification and procedures created
>by the United States Constitution he is purporting to enforce.
>6. Should Obama become the Nominee of the Democratic Party and then be discovered by virtue of malfeasance, or negligence, on his part not to have revealed material evidence showing him to be Ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and thereby his Nomination be declared void by the appropriate Authorities Acting under the Law, Plaintiff as well as other Democratic Americans will suffer Irreparable Harm including but not limited to:
>A) Functional, or Actual, Disenfranchisement of large numbers of Citizens, being members of the Democratic Party, who would have been deprived of the ability to choose a Nominee of their liking;
>B) Irreparable Harm to the structure and integrity of the Democratic Party and the Democratic National Committee. In tum, this too would lead to Disenfranchisement; and
>C) A severe and genuine likelihood of Civil Disturbance by virtue of reaction to said Disenfranchisement.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This case arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and presents a federal question within this Court’s jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
This Court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S. C. § 2201.
Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.c. § 1391(b).
>
PARTIES
Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter "Plaintiff'], is an adult individual with a businessaddress of 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531.
Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama, alk/a Barry Soetoro, alkla Barry Obama, alk/a Barack Dunham, a/kla Barry Dunham [hereinafter “Obama” is an adult individual with an office address of713 Hatch, Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.
Obama, The Democratic National Committee (hereinafter referred to as “DNC”) is a Corporation with a principal address of 430 S. Capitol Street SE, Washington, DC 20003.
Defendant, The Federal Election Commission (FEC) was created in 1975 by Congress to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). The FEC is a Governmental Agency with a principal address of 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20463.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Since the beginning of the U.S. Constitution, in order to run for Office of the President, you must be a “natural born citizen” and you may not hold dual citizenship or multiple citizenships with foreign Countries. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1.
There are questions as to where Obama was actually born, in the United States or abroad and then registered his birth. There are further questions regarding Obama’s United States Citizenship, ifhe ever held such, being expatriated and his failure to regain his citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance once he turned eighteen (18) years of age. There are additional questions regarding Obama’s multi citizenships with foreign countries, which he still maintains. To date, Obama has refused to prove he is qualified under the U.S. Constitution and his eligibility to run as President ofthe United States.
The facts are undisputed by Obama that his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a U.S. Citizen however, his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a Citizen of Kenya. Obama’s parents, according to divorce records, were married on or about February 2, 1961.
Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961; however, has never given the name of the hospital he was born in; whereas Obama’s grandmother on his father’s side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya. Reports reflect Obama’s mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy, which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight. Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.
Upon investigation into the birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version under the subject “Barack Obama”
Z:\FORMS\Obama Complaint.uoc
states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version under the subject “Queens Hospital” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.
There are further references circulating on the internet claiming examination of the hospital’s records in Hawaii show no birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama), Obama’s mother. However, there are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.
Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal was a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008 stating the GOP sent a research team to Mombasa, Kenya and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity Hospital, to his father, a Kenyan Citizen and his mother, a U.S. Citizen.
At the time ofObama’s birth in 1961, Kenya was a British Colony.
There is a Canadian Birth Certificate posted on the Internet in the name of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.; however, the date of birth shows to be August 23, 1961.
Under the Independence Constitution of Kenya, Obama became a Kenyan citizen on December 12, 1963. Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin states Obama has never renounced his Kenyan citizenship. Andy Martin further states on Obama’s Senate web site, Obama tap dances around his own dual nationality when discussing his father. Obama obviously knows, because his father told the Obama, that he (Obama) also held/holds Kenyan nationality.
If in fact Obama was born in Kenya, the laws on the books at the time of his birth stated if a child is born abroad and one parent was a U.S. Citizen, which would have been his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother would have had to live ten (10) years in the United States, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14). At the time of
Z:\FORMS\Obama Complaint.doc
Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18) and therefore did not meet the
residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship. The laws in effect at the time of Obama’s birth prevented U.S. Citizenship at birth of children born abroad to a U.S. Citizen parent and a non-citizen parent, if the citizen parent was under the age of nineteen (19) at the time of the birth of the child. Obama’s mother did not qualify under the law on the books to register Obama as a “natural born” citizen. Section 301(a)(7) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27,1952,66 Stat. 163, 235, 8 U.S.c. §1401(b), Matter of S-F-and G-, 2 I & N Dec. 182 (B.I.A.) approved (Att’y Gen. 1944). Obama would have only been Naturalized and a Naturalized citizen is not qualified and/or eligible to run for Office of the President. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section Clause 4.
Furthermore, if Obama had been born in Kenya, his birth father Barack Obama, Sf. was a citizen of Kenya; therefore, Obama would have automatically become a citizen of Kenya.
In or about 1967, when Obama was approximately six (6) years old, his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and moved to Indonesia with Obama. At this time, if Obama was Registered as a “natural born” citizen, which he did not qualify to be registered as, he would have lost his U.S. Citizenship when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and took up residency in Indonesia. The first requirement is that naturalization must be achieved through “application.” Such type of naturalization occurs, for example, when a person acquires a foreign nationality by marriage to a national of that country. Nationality Act of 1940, Section
Z:\FORMS\Obama Complaint.doc
>317(b). Additionally, there is rumor circulating on the Internet that his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, adopted Obama.
>The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when the person became naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody of such person. Obama’s mother expatriated her U.s. Citizenship when she married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.
>Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration where it clearly states Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and lists his citizenship as Indonesian, Obama’s father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of birth and place of birth are listed as August 4,1961 in Honolulu and Obama’s Religion is listed as Islam. This document was verified by television show Inside Edition, whose reporter, Matt Meagher took the actual footage of the school record.
>In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.
>Sometime after the return of Obama to Hawaii, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham returned to Hawaii and divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro. At the time of Divorce, Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham could have regained her U.S. Citizenship. In order to regain her citizenship, Obama’s mother would have had to take the oath of allegiance required. Such oath of allegiance may be taken abroad before a diplomatic or consular of the United States, or in the United States before the Attorney General or the judge or clerk of a Court. Such Oath of allegiance would have been entered in the records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the
>L\FORMS\Ohama Complaint.ooc
Attorney General and upon demand, a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath administered, under the seal of the embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney General shall be delivered. The certified copy shall be evidence of the facts stated therein before any court of record or judicial tribunal and in any department or agencyoftheGovernment oftheUnitedStates. 8U.S.c.§1435.
31. As stated above, The Nationality Act of 1940 provided for the loss of citizenship when the person became naturalized upon the naturalization of his or her parent having custody of such person. Obama’s mother expatriated her U.S. Citizenship when she married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and relocated her and her son (Obama) to Indonesia.
Obama’s mother failed to take the oath in order to regam her U.S. Citizenship. Therefore, Obama would not have been able to regain his U.S. Citizenship until he turned eighteen (18) years after he took the oath of allegiance before a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, or in the U.S. before the Attorney General or the judge or clerk of court. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama failed to regain his citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance. Since the oath of allegiance would have been entered in the records of the appropriate embassy, legation, consulate, court or the Attorney General, if Plaintiff is incorrect, then Obama should be able to produce in Court a certified copy of the proceedings, including a copy of the oath administered.
Investigation further showed in 1981, Obama traveled to Pakistan usmg his Indonesian passport. At the time of travels to Indonesia, Obama was twenty (20) years old. He was well aware he maintained his Indonesia citizenship, and failed to regain his United States citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship. Had Obama
Z:\FORMS\Obama COl11plaint.doc
regained his United States citizenship, he would have been traveling on a United States Passport.
Obama and his Campaign office have been asked Obama’s Certificate of Birth in order to prove he is a “natural born” citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.
After many attempts of the public to obtain Obama’s Certificate of Birth, a Hawaiian CCl1iticate of Live Birth (COLB) was placed on Obama’s campaign website. However, as posted all over the internet, three (3) independent Document Forensic Experts performed extensive Forensic testing on the Certificate of Live Birth posted on Obama’s campaign \vebsite. Thc Forensic Expert findings were the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) was in a forgery. It was further discovered that this original Cer1ificate of Live Bil1h which had becn altered and f()rged was issued to Maya Kasandra Soetoro, born in J 970. Maya Kasandra Soetoro is Obama’s half sister \vho was born in Indonesia and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on Obama’s website located at http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
Further investigation led to Obama’s State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record. On the Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record it specifically asks for “Full former name(s). Obama put “None,” when in fact he went by the name Barry Soetoro, and Barry Obama. It is further believed Obama has used the name Barry Dunham. Obama lied on the State government form that he signed under the penalty of perjury.
Even if Obama maintained his United States Citizenship, which he failed to do, he also carries citizenships in Kenya and Indonesia. Obama has divided loyalties with
Z\FORMS\Ohama Comr1aint.doc
foreign countries. Thus, Obama carries multiple citizenships and is ineligible to run for President of the United States. United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1.
All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because the Obama cheated his way into a fraudulent candidacy and cheated legitimately eligible natural born citizens from competing in a fair process and the supporters of their citizen choice for the nomination.
Voters donated money, goods and services to select a nominee, and were defrauded by Obama’s obfuscations. Obama clearly shows consciousness of guilt by his actions by posting a forged birth certificate on his website, and by and the falsifications he told to cover his loss of citizenship.
Obama proclaims himself a Constitutional scholar and lecturer, but did not learn he had no eligibility to become President except by means of obfuscations and deceptions.
The injunctive relief must be granted because failing to do so, this inaction defrauds everyone who voted in the Democratic Primary for a nominee that is a fair representation of the voters. Failure to grant injunctive relief would allow a corrupted, fraudulent nomination process to continue.
It not only allows, but promotes an overwhelming degree of disrespect and creates such a lack of confidence in voters of the primary process itself, so that it would cement a prevailing belief that no potential candidate has to obey the laws of this country, respect our election process, follow the Constitution, or even suffer any consequence for lying and defrauding voters to get onto the ballot when they have no chance of serving if they fraudulently manage to get elected.
If declaratory and injunctive relief is not given, it would be extremely unfair to the country for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question as to the nominee’s eligibility to serve if elected.
As stated above, Plaintiff as well as Democratic American Citizens will suffer Irreparable Harm if Declaratory and Injunctive relief is not granted. Plaintiff does not have any other way of redress regarding these very significant and important issues.
The DNC has failed Plaintiff and the Democratic American Citizens by their failure to perform due diligence and inquire into Obama’s eligibility to run for Office of the President.
COUNT ONE
>
VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE II, SECTION I
>Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 45 as if fully set forth herein.
>
>The United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 4, Qualifications, Office of President, states: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of
>thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
>Obama’s failure to maintain his United States Citizenship makes him ineligible to run for Office ofthe President.
>Obama, if born in Kenya would have made him a citizen of Kenya. Furthennore, because of the 1940 Naturalization Act, June 1952, Obama’s mother would have had to be nineteen (19) in order for Obama to be a “natural born” United States citizenship upon registration of his birth. Obama’s mother was only eighteen (18) when she birthed Obama and therefore was not old enough to meet the residency requirements under our laws at the time of Obama’s birth and be able to register her son’s birth as a “natural born” citizen.
>Even if Obama would have been able to be registered as a “natural born” citizen in Hawaii, he lost his citizenship in the United States when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and then took Obama to Indonesia and set up residency with her new husband.
>Obama’s mother could have regained her and Obama’s United States Citizenship status when she divorced her husband, Lolo Soetoro and moved back to Hawaii. However, in order to regain her citizenship in the United States she would have had to take the oath of allegiance, which would have been recorded. Obama’s mother never did take the oath of allegiance to regain her citizenship In the United States.
>Moreover, Obama could have regained his citizenship in the United States when he turned eighteen (18), again by taking the oath ofallegiance that would have been recorded. However, Obama failed to do so.
>The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic
Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire into Obama’s eligibility status.
54. For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately supply a certified copy of his oath of allegiance proving he regained his United States Citizenship. In addition, Obama needs to furnish a certified copy of his Certificate of Live Birth to further prove he was born in Hawaii as he claims. However, if Obama is unable to supply a certified record of his oath of allegiance, he needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for President.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:
A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office ofthe President under the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;
B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of the President;
C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry
Z:IFORMSIObama Complaint.doc
Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;
D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.c. § 1988 and other applicable by law; and
E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
COUNT TWO
>
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 54 as if fully set forth herein.
From the beginning of our Constitution, our forefathers inferred a person running for Office of the President could not have divided loyalties. This was a result of people coming from England to the United States who owed loyalties to both England and the United States. Our forefather’s did not want a person with dual loyalties to be able to secure the position as President of the United States.
This inference is taken from Article II, Section I, which plainly states qualifications for Office of the President must be a “natural born” citizen.
The United States President cannot run our Country and have responsibilities and obligations owed to other countries.
Obama is not eligible to run for Office of the United States President as his mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, when Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his
United States Citizenship when he turned eighteen (18). Therefore, Obama is not
>a “natural born” citizen.
>Furthermore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a United States Passport.
>The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire into Obama’s eligibility status.
>For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.
WHEREFORE, PlaintitfrespectfuIly prays that this Court:
>A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office ofthe President under the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;
>B. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of the President;
C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;
D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and other applicable by law; and
E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
COUNT THREE
>
FRAUD
Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 62 as if fully set forth herein.
Obama committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American Citizens by running for President claiming to be eligible knowing he was not eligible as a result of his failure to regain his United States Citizenship and by maintaining multi citizenships with Kenya and Indonesia.
Obama further committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American people by falsifying infonnation on his Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record. Obama stated on his Application to the State Bar of Illinois, as proven by the Illinois State Bar Registration and Disciplinary Record, stating he never used any other names. Obama signed his
Z:IFORMSIOhama Complaint.doc
>application/registration for the Illinois State Bar under the penalty of perjury
>knowing the information to be false. The fact of the matter is Obama used the
>name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia and was registered as a citizen of Indonesia on
>his school records. Obama further used the name Barry Obama and it is further
>believed Obama used the name Barack and/or Barry Dunham.
>Obama attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American people by allowing an altered and forged Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) to be placed on his campaign website. Obama was well aware the Government issued COLB was altered and forged as the original document was in the name of Maya Kasandra Soetoro born in 1970. Maya Kassandra Soetoro Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia and her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB IS still on Obama’s website located at 11 ttV:/1my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert
>Obama further attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American People by claiming to be a United States Citizen, knowing this information to be false. Obama is well aware when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia and took up residency in Indonesia with Obama, they both naturalized in Indonesia expatriating their United States Citizenship. Obama’s mother failed to regain her citizenship after her divorce to Lolo Soetoro, when Obama was a minor and Obama himself failed to regain his United States Citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance, which is recorded when he turned eighteen (18) years.
>Furthennore, Obama is well aware he is not a United States Citizen and does not qualify as a “natural born” citizen. Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981, at which time he was twenty (20) years old and used his Indonesian Passport, not a United States passport.
>Moreover, as stated above, Obama was registered in School in Jakarta, Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, born in 1961 in Hawaii and his religion was registered as Islam.
>The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect the interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President under the qualifications of the United States Constitution. The DNC has failed to inquire into Obama’s eligibility status.
>For the above aforementioned reasons, Obama needs to immediately step down and withdrawal his candidacy for Presidency.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court:
>A. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham is ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I;
>B. Preliminary and pennanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a
>Z:\FORMS\Obama Complaint.doc
Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from running for United States Office of the President;
C. Preliminary and pelmanently enjoin Defendant, The Democratic Committee from nominating Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k!a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k!a Barack Dunham as the Democratic Nominee;
D. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and other applicable by law; and
E. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
>Attorney in Pro Se 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Identification No. 09867
>(610) 825-3134
>
VERIFICATION
I, PHILIP J. BERG, hereby state that I am the Plaintiff in this action and verify that the statements made in the foregoing Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. The undersigned understands that the statements therein are made subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. Section 4904 relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.
>

Posted by: b | October 18, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

It’s very simple guys.
Obama = tax cut for the middle/lower and 95% of Americans
McCain = tax cut for super rich and 5% of millionairs and billionairs.
Unless you’re win the lottery tomorrow. you as an average american, don’t exist in McCain tax cut plan.

Posted by: bluespike | October 18, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

For a so called brilliant lawyer, Obama looks like a blithering idiot.
Posted by: Gregh
————————————–
Marxist Obama had an excellent education thanks to this great country, which gave him the opportunity to do so. The sad part is that he forgot his brains at Harvard.

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

With the caliber of content in these postings it is no wonder this country is screwed up. People keep cutting and pasting the same lies over and over. It has been proven that Obama is not Muslim, does not pal around with terrorists, he is not a socialist. He is a caring individual who is a U.S. Citizen, Christian man, honest and never cheated on his wife. McCain on the other hand, cheated on his first wife several times and applied for a marriage license before he was even divorced. Some character – not what we want in presidential character. When asked if it was okay to lie he said yes. Obama said it was never okay to lie to the American people. He has integrity – the Bush administration did not and McCain and Palin definitely have no integrity. Constant lies from them.

Posted by: Fedup | October 18, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

He must have produced the birth certificate or he would not be running. I talked to the election office about this, they stated that if he had not provided proof of citizenship at the time of applying for the office, he would not have made it as far as he did. Anybody can file a lawsuit, what that doesn’t show is that the plaintiff lost that case and Obama proved his was a citizen of the USA…even McCain admitted to that when that crazy women in the red shirt accused him of being an arab. Like I said in my last post, all you have are lies.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

How can people who do not work get a tax cut if they do not pay taxes? Can some one explain this to me.
Posted by: George Washington | Oct 18, 2008 9:45:04 PM
—————————————
I guess for the same reason people that do not pay taxes got a stimulus check.
___________________________
and the same reason, big business can screw-up
managing so bad, YET get rewarded for this with
a bail out from the Government.
Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First

Posted by: spacerook1 | October 18, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Some of you guys are crazy as hell on this board, this is a no brainer. If you don’t like Obama then don’t vote for him. You guys like the last 8 yrs and with Mcsame you will just love the next 4. I get it, I understand, I know. You don’t want tax cuts, you don’t want any credits on your health care, you don’t want any help on your college fund, you love paying for high food & gas, no social security, no medicare or medicade. We get it. A bunch of sickoooo on this damn board!!!

Posted by: wane | October 18, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Constant lies from them.
Posted by: Fedup
—————————————
Please watch this presentation and then come and tell us what part of it you consider “lies”. Enough is enough with the far left wing liberal idiots telling us that Obama is in fact The Messiah and as such he is above any scrutiny!
A VIDEO PORTRAIT OF BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA
http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?RsrcID=2036

Posted by: Natasha | October 18, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

“No, ma’am. He’s a decent family man and U.S. citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that’s what this campaign’s all about. He’s NOT an Arab. I have to tell you. Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don’t have to be scared of as president of the United States.”
——Quote by John McCain
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/14479.html

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Tax increase = cut job. Prices don’t go up and same $ kept in pocket of owner. So who suffers? Most likely the small business owner.
Oh well, the liberals will be happy.
Posted by: Eyes-Wide-Open | Oct 18, 2008 7:52:04 PM
—————————————
I defy you to show how Bush/McCain’s policies are better than Obama’s.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

you MUST work to get a tax cut. period. IF you pay social security tax (which EVERYONE does) then you get a percentage of that tax back as a tax credit EVEN if you do not make enough t o pay federal tax, and this basically applies to high school and college kids or moms who work part and dont make enough to pay federal tax but still pay social security tax. So what IS your problem republcians? You are whiners. The tax rate that the above 250K pay is the SAME AS REAGANS for that tax bracket. it’s perfectly fair and YOU Will get to keep MORE of your money with Obama so what is the world is your problem? man, you people just HAVE to b*tch b^tch b%tch!!! You’re like a bunch of old ladies. Just take your money and shut up already. You’re so stupid. You will pay MORE taxes under McCain AND you will be taxed on your healthcare. I’m sorry, but how STUPID are you???

Posted by: Matt | October 18, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

McCain believes in tax cuts only for the top 5%: the wealthiest people in the nation. Bush’s policies of welfare for the rich and rampant deregulation have driven our economy into the ground. I’m sick of trickle down economics. Let’s help out the little guy for a change!!!
P.S. If you make under $250,000 a year and still plan on voting for McCain: you need to get your head examined.

Posted by: MatthewStLouis | October 18, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Tax increase = cut job. Prices don’t go up and same $ kept in pocket of owner. So who suffers? Most likely the small business owner.
Oh well, the liberals will be happy.
Posted by: Eyes-Wide-Open | Oct 18, 2008 7:52:04 PM
—————————————
I defy you to show how Bush/McCain’s policies are better than Obama’s. After all, we have 8 years experience with Bush/McCain’s policies. Can you admit it’s a utter failure?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Natasha – I never said Obama was the Messiah – there is only one Messiah and that is Jesus Christ.
However, Obama offers hope for this country and this country is in financial ruins now because of the Bush administration of which McCain supported deregulation that contributed to the collapse of the financial market. Get your facts straight before you spew your lies. Take your blinders off and see McCain for what he really is – a lying jerk. Even many Republicans have criticized him and his changing stance and bumbling way of talking. He contradicted himself several times in the last debate – couldn’t keep his facts straight. So much for his experience and intelligence – not!!

Posted by: fedup | October 18, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

To most the people here making the misleading statement that tax cuts on working americans is welfare…is that what you call it when your enjoying your tax refund…because statistics show half of you get a refund. Well if mccain gets in, the rich WILL get a welfare check if thats what you want to call it.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

I can imagine how the McCain campaign cringe when they see the huge crowds that attend Obama rallies. Two words for you Republicans..”IT OVER!”. Put down the spiked koolaid that you’ve been drinking, take two days to return to a modicum of normalcy and then get with the crowd..go out and vote OBAMA! Heaven help us all and save us from those Republicans!

Posted by: Stanley | October 18, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Matthew,
McCain is not cuttin anyone’s taxes…he is keeping the rates the same as they currently are (read the facts don’t listen to the idiots). And if you don’t mae 250k a yeear the only way nobama’s plan souunds good is if you don’t ever want to make more (or are incapable of making more) His tax credits take from the producing population and gives those who pay no federal income taxes…if you get something for nothing it is welfate

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

It’s only welfare when you get back more than you pay in…and you can’t count social security taxes because those are a forced retirement tax. It is welfare when you pay nothing and get cash back

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

McCain keeps taxes the same, I’ll agree with you on that…give the rich tax cuts and ignore the middle class, isn’t that how we’re doing it now? Doesn’t sound like change to me, sounds like more of the same.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

David,
That is a very insensitive and cruel comment to say that someone doesn’t want to or is incapable of making $250,000 a year. Must you look down on others who have jobs that don’t pay as much. Police officers, support staff, nurses, many good careers would never make $250,000, but the people who serve in these careers are good, hard working people who pay their taxes and care about their communities. For those of us living in this country we need to care about each other and help those in need, not push them down. I’m sick of people looking down on someone because they make less or because they don’t have a PhD or drive a BMW. We all came into this world the same way and it is time we show respect for others no matter their job title, bank account, race, sex or religion.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Obama/Biden 08 !!!!

Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Obama drew a total of 175,000+ today, while McCain drew 3000. hmmm I wonder who is going to win?

Posted by: Sandra | October 18, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Obama/Biden 08 !!!!!!

Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

100,000 people in the street of a Midwestern City watching ONE MAN, not a Rock Star or a Sports Star, speak. WHY? Because they wanted to. Because he is literally inspirational, he exudes pride in our country, and provides a platform for us all to cheer. He doesn’t draw us to hear him by making us scared not too, he makes us feel good about who we are in the world and what further greatness we are capable of. Whether or not you believe everything you hear, you can understand from him that he loves this country and everything it is, and it’s about time an elected official stood up and said it without grunting desperate threats of absolute doom for those who don’t fall into line with him. Thank You Obama, We wish you safety in strength in your journey ahead.

Posted by: Thatoneolgirl | October 18, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Fact is, SOMEBODY has to be taxed, thats how America pays the bills…right now it’s not the rich people on wall street…it’s the middle class. Difference is, if your making 250,000+, your not having trouble paying the bills, the people bailing out rich wall street CEO’s and oil companies are. I think it’s time the middle class get a break from the mess the rich CEO’s and oil companies put us in.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Marty,
Everybody chooses their career path. I have teachers in my family as well as police officers…my wife worked with autistic kids when we first were married. I have no problem with those who choose (key word) to do jobs that pay in other ways beside money. But to begrudge people who work hard and make more and then create tax credits that give tax rebates to people in amounts greater than they paid in is not a principle that is going to strengthen our country. It will weaken it to the breaking point because more and more (look at welfare as an example) will come to rely on that. Already almost 80% of federal taxes are paid by 20% of the population.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

It’s only welfare when you get back more than you pay in…and you can’t count social security taxes because those are a forced retirement tax. It is welfare when you pay nothing and get cash back
Posted by: David | Oct 18, 2008 11:35:34 PM
—————————————-
McCain is using the word welfare as code as a connection to Obama and minorities. Can McCain/Palin get anymore sleazy?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

By the way, McCain and Cindy made over 4 MILLION dollars last year, how can they possibly be in touch with the pain Americans are feeling? Hard times for them is the maid not showing up for work. While we are sitting at our dinner tables trying to decide how we are going to pay the bills, McCain is trying to decide which of the 8 dinner tables he wants to sit at that night.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

IF it is McCain who gets in or Obama, there are going to be taxes. As far as Welfare, we just gave a $700BILLION welfare check to Wall Street Fat Cats that screwed up and caused the meltdown. The Tax thing is John McCain’s smoking mirror, that is all he’s got. It’s wrong. I do care that Obama, is black, purple or orange. What I care about is the integrity and leadership and diplomacy, and brilliance needed to get this country back from the brink of a full blown Depression. The hell with taxes, if you have nothing, no home, no income, no job, no 401K left, massive bank failures, immediate job closings and zero income, what the hell are taxes ??? They mean nothing. And that is where we are folks. And since George and his pals, which includes McCain, put us here, they certainly are not going to fix the matter. Obama, will if elected. Wake the Hell UP! And the most unthinkable thought is this: McCain is 72 years old. He is not in the best of health. His judgment is very flawed to have chosen Palin. Here’s the point; Can we, can you afford to have her running the country with all the complex problems we now face, in the event he succumbs? NO! NO WAY! So I do not give a rat’s butt about taxes, we will pay them either way, the core matter is responsibility, direction, leadership, integrity, and the smarts to save us from total economic failure. The ability to promote a “Better America, a United AMERICA, A HEALED AMERICA” McCain can not do this, and Palin, is a joke! THINK CLE

Posted by: JaMar | October 18, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

IJ,
If you believe Obama is going to give you a tax break you’re not as bright as you sound. Come mid next year (i agree he will win) he will claim that W handed him an economy so bad that he can’t afford to lower taxes. In fact everything that goes bad over the next four years nobama will blame on bush. He will not take responsibility. How do I know…every time he’s had to backtrack it was only after irrefutable evidence made him. He’s not a man…but what politician is.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Well said JaMar.

Posted by: Independent John | October 18, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

I love the Bush/McCain people (remember 90% of the McCain campaign are ex-Bush White House lackeys who got us into this mess). They trot out a thousand emails about McCain’s corporate welfare saying these are tax cuts? This is the same, exactly the same policy that has ruin us economically. It did it at the end of Reagon’s term and it is doing it again now. But beyond that, you can see them sweating. They are working ABC overtime because they know they are in serious trouble. They have their legion of emailers and phone-callers because that is all they have left. Their whole economic plan is based on the same old worn-out, supply-side, trickle down charade that has done this country zero good. They yell “Socialist” when anyone with more than 250.000 a year is called on to do a miniscule increase that would still leave them paying less than they would have under Reagon and they say this is a “redistribution of the wealth”? They are dreaming if they think this time around most Americans are going to fall for their McCarthyesque nonsense. Neo-cons, your time is up.

Posted by: Bob Long | October 18, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

IJ,
Obama made almost 8 million last year…your logic is hollow…your a hack.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

If you believe Obama is going to give you a tax break you’re not as bright as you sound. Come mid next year (i agree he will win) he will claim that W handed him an economy so bad that he can’t afford to lower taxes. In fact everything that goes bad over the next four years nobama will blame on bush. He will not take responsibility. How do I know…every time he’s had to backtrack it was only after irrefutable evidence made him. He’s not a man…but what politician is.
Posted by: David | Oct 18, 2008 11:48:14 PM
—————————————-
Show me ANY republican that has taken responsibility for the financial mess they’ve created?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 18, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

David
How has $10 billion dollars a month for a war we never should have been in strengthening our country. We are in this financial ruin because of poor decisions by the Bush administration. We are trillions in debt to China – McCain signed for the bailout of which he contributed to the downfall through deregulation in the investment business. Now he is criticizing the plan. McCain supports the war – how can you support a man who changes his story constantly? He is a blatant liar. We didn’t have a choice on the war – but we lose our sons and daughters and husbands and wives in Iraq. I don’t want my tax money going to support a war in Iraq – I fully support our troops but not the war or the reason we went to war. I would rather pay tax money to give health care and food on the table to the poor. I work with a woman who’s husband walked out on her with 3 kids to raise on her own. She can only afford health care for her kids on her salary – not for herself. So re-evaluate your support of a man who cares about the rich not the middle class. $5000 health care – that is nothing for someone who has health issues – plus he is taxing health care – so much for his “no new taxes” pledge. McCain is all LIES.

Posted by: marty | October 18, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Jamar,
Those of us who believe in less government (I oppose the bailout) and less infringements and less taxes will never support nobama (40% of the country) he will win the election and probably have a super majority in the senate…so he’ll have no excuses. But he will still be making them once his 4 years are up. 2012

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

IF it is McCain who gets in or Obama, there are going to be taxes. As far as Welfare, we just gave a $700BILLION welfare check to Wall Street Fat Cats that screwed up and caused the meltdown. The Tax thing is John McCain’s smoking mirror, that is all he’s got. It’s wrong. I do care that Obama, is black, purple or orange. What I care about is the integrity and leadership and diplomacy, and brilliance needed to get this country back from the brink of a full blown Depression. The hell with taxes, if you have nothing, no home, no income, no job, no 401K left, massive bank failures, immediate job closings and zero income, what the hell are taxes ??? They mean nothing. And that is where we are folks. And since George and his pals, which includes McCain, put us here, they certainly are not going to fix the matter. Obama, will if elected. Wake the Hell UP! And the most unthinkable thought is this: McCain is 72 years old. He is not in the best of health. His judgment is very flawed to have chosen Palin. Here’s the point; Can we, can you afford to have her running the country with all the complex problems we now face, in the event he succumbs? NO! NO WAY! So I do not give a rat’s butt about taxes, we will pay them either way, the core matter is responsibility, direction, leadership, integrity, and the smarts to save us from total economic failure. The ability to promote a “Better America, a United AMERICA, A HEALED AMERICA” McCain can not do this, and Palin, is a joke! THINK CLE

Posted by: stopthemaddness | October 18, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Even factcheck.org said that Obama’s tax relief plan only applies to 81% of americans not 95% like Obama says.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 18, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Marty,
We are not in this financial mess because of W. We are in this mess because millions of idiots borrowed more money than they could afford to borrow. That’s it…those people need to own up to their bad decisions. W never forced the lendor or the borrowers to do this. On the contrary Fannie and Freddie loosened the lending standards to a point that my wife who doesn’t work could have bought 500k condo just by signing her name with no proof. Many are at fault but deregulation is not scapegoat you think and the way I know you really have no clue on this issue is the fact that you would actually say that. Nobama sais it try and make hay but he knows it’s not true either.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Marty,
We are not in this financial mess because of W. We are in this mess because millions of idiots borrowed more money than they could afford to borrow. That’s it…those people need to own up to their bad decisions. W never forced the lendor or the borrowers to do this. On the contrary Fannie and Freddie loosened the lending standards to a point that my wife who doesn’t work could have bought 500k condo just by signing her name with no proof. Many are at fault but deregulation is not scapegoat you think and the way I know you really have no clue on this issue is the fact that you would actually say that. Nobama sais it try and make hay but he knows it’s not true either.

Posted by: David | October 18, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

sounds like robin hood to me. let’s rob from the rich to give to the poor. that way we equal what people make. no wait, that would be socialism.
don’t worry about your taxes, the “patriotic” people who make $250,000 will foot your bill for you. don’t believe it for a minute.

Posted by: zeke | October 18, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

WOW! Do you Republicans have anything positive to say? Hey, this if for you guys (and gals).
From RIGHT-WING polling site:
IBD/TIPP DAILY:
October 18
McCain 39.8%
Obama 47.2% +7.4 Obama
They were the most accurate national poll in 2004.

Posted by: sandy | October 18, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Over 100,000 strong rally. Wow!! My My My!!. I bet the McCain folks have belly Aches!! and visiting the restroom every 2 minutes now with diarrhea!! whiles McCain is Constipated

Posted by: Disgruntled And Mentally Recessioned Republican | October 19, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

McSame is selling the same failed economic policy as Bush did 4 years ago. Anybody has any doubt about that after the wall street meltdown?

Posted by: leighg1 | October 19, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

“oppressive tax increases” …..hey brainless, when Reagan had this EXACT tax bracket and rate did ANYBODY call it oppressive? Here’s a fact you obviously dont know, those making over $250K NEVER had such a low tax rate. Bush gave it ot them with the idea that it will trickel down. Did it? no. Did it create jobs? no. Did that money even stay in our economy? no. it was invested overseas. What Obama is doing is saying “i am NOT going to increase deficit BUT I need to find money and give it back to the middle class. Where can i get 400 billion from???? gee, lookie here, Bush CREATED these tax subsidies for the rich that they NEVER HAD before him and they have done NOTHING to create jobs (the original reason they were given) so, to keep the budget the SAME let’s try giving those tax credits to MIDDLE CLASS FOLKS INSTEAD. HOW can ANYONE have a problem with that ESPECIALLY whne THEY will be part of the group who NOW will get teh tax credit. how STUPID are you????? Obama is holding up a junk of cash and saying “WHO GETS IT? YOU?? You want it?” and you are actually saying “NO, give it to that guy who makes $1m instead”….??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? HOW STUPID ARE YOU??????? PRETTY DAMN STUPID!

Posted by: Matt | October 19, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Marty,
you logic about the war was the same logic that was being thrown around in France from 1776 – 1782. I’m glad the french took a chance and spent the money to help our fledgling democracy get started. it took us 30 years to truly sort things why don’t you give Iraq another 30 months?

Posted by: David | October 19, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

David,
Don’t patronize me – I know a hell of a lot more than you apparently do. I’ve worked in the business world and with lawyers for years. I don’t need you telling me what I do or don’t know. But you are obviously brainwashed . Maybe if you had a few life experiences with people who have struggled and helped out some of the poor you would have more compassion and understanding.

Posted by: marty | October 19, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I’m positive we’ll be in big trouble if Obama wins.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I thought this was an interesting article from Bloomberg today:
Oct. 18 (Bloomberg) — Freddie Mac and American International Group Inc., two companies bailed out by the U.S. government as the financial crisis unfolded, each contributed $250,000 for last month’s Republican National Convention, Federal Election Commission filings show. The money went to the local host committee for the convention in St. Paul, Minnesota, which raised $50 million. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, New York investment banks that changed to bank holding companies and therefore put themselves under increased federal regulation, also contributed money for the Republican convention. Goldman Sachs gave $255,000, and Morgan Stanley donated $100,000. New York-based JPMorgan Chase & Co., which bought Bear Stearns Cos., contributed $100,000. The host committee also received $25,000 from the Saginaw Chippewa, an Indian tribe formerly represented by ex-Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is now in prison.
More at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20081018/pl_bloomberg/axkxmxbffle;_ylt=Ao0Xpvl7B8lwsZ8YNWKFkhWog9IF

Posted by: sandy | October 19, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Legislation that would make it more difficult for workers to hold a private ballot vote in unionization drives, which critics say would lead to harassment and intimidation, has spurred a pitched battle between powerful labor unions supportive of Sen. Barack Obama and big business in the presidential campaign.
Obama has promised union bosses that the Employee Free Choice Act will become law in 2009 if he wins the presidency in November.

Posted by: lilij | October 19, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

McCain is just another Bush .. bilk the middle class but protect the wealthy .. at least Obama wants to help the middle class and the low income workers with tax breaks.. McBush is a Rip Off

Posted by: ZakD | October 19, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

” let’s rob from the rich to give to the poor.” …ROB????? they NEVER had such low taxes!! NEVER! Bush’s grand “Trickle down” idea was supposed to ‘grow the economy”. IT DIDN”T! Those tax SUBSIDIES should have been repealed on THAT POINT ALONE! BUT instead, Obama is saying, well, yeah, let’s repeal them, THEY DIDN”T WORK but since it’s inthe budget anyway let’s give them to MIDDLE CLASS FOLKS and AT LEAST we KNOW they will be spent in THIS country and stimulate our economy at least a little, at least help businesses here a little. You know, one more tiem you go to your hairdresser instead of doing ityourself, one time you goout to eat, one more time that restaurant owners can pay his bills, it makes sense. Perfect sense. Those tax cuts DID NOT WORK. They were Bush’s! That tax bracket NEVER had such low taxes before Bush and apparently, loweringthem that much did jack for our economy so just forget it. they can go back to their old rate which is STILL teh LOWEST of any industrialized democracy IN THE WORLD!!! So don’t boo hoo them. They’re fine. We’re fine. My hubby and I might be thta bracket if things work our way next year. Trust me, we’re doing quite well right now.

Posted by: jessy | October 19, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

David – you are clueless. Another 30 months at $10 billion a month – lets see – how many more trillions will we owe China. We will be in a great financial situation. While our bridges are collapsing in this country and roads are falling apart, Iraq is being rebuilt and China is laughing at us. We never should have been in Iraq – the terrorists were in Afghanistan. If there were weapons in Iraq – after Bush announced war for a year – did they really expect to find anything? This war was poorly planned, and poorly executed. If you love the war so much – go and fight it yourself and McCain with you.

Posted by: marty | October 19, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

McCain claiming that Obama will turn the IRS “into a giant welfare agency.” And this even though McCain’s rationale for this claim is Obama’s support for a refundable tax credit, something McCain HIMSELF supports as a centerpiece of his health care plan. Par for the course, really: if you figure in the robocalls and recent ads, McCain’s entire campaign is now comprised of innuendo and lies meant to tie Obama to various stereotypes of African-Americans and of course Arab terrorism. His purported foreign policy experience hasn’t been part of the campaign’s message in weeks.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/238167.php

Posted by: sandy | October 19, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Promises are just that..promises. we’ll see if barack hussein osama follows thru.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Never heard of him, and don’t care.
Posted by: Mack | Oct 17, 2008 4:13:51 PM
—————————————-
Then perhaps you’ve heard how Bush/McCain and the rest of the republicans have ruined our great nation?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Don’t worry Zeke, he won’t. They never do. It’s all a dog and pony show. Tell the masses what they want to hear, get elected, and spend your term paying off the people who helped get yout there, while lining your pockets as well. It will be the same old crap in another four years.

Posted by: It's all B.S. | October 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Lilij,
You obviously don’t know what the Employee Free Choice Act is for – it is not about secret ballot. It is about unionization – to make it easier to form a union without having an election. If enough employees sign a card stating that they want a union – the union will be established without the company having the ability to hold a union free campaign to educate the employees about the values of remaining union free, and without the conducting of an election.

Posted by: fedup | October 19, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

trickle up economics…well it’s never been tried before. maybe there’s a reason. things dont trickle up. a little thing called gravity.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The stimulus package showed us just how well trickle up works.

Posted by: Bahhhh | October 19, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Zeke: You said it right. Obama is not for the poor by all means. He never was. Obama was not a community organizer on the southside for the people he was using the people for his own benefit because he already planned to run for the presidency. When he met ayers in 1995 he already knew about him. He wasn’t 8 years when he met him. And the story about them two working together on the board at Acorn. I hope Fox keeps that story going so the voters can get a good opinion of Obama before they vote.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 19, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I’m positive we’ll be in big trouble if Obama wins.
Posted by: zeke | Oct 19, 2008 12:03:29 AM
—————————————-
I take that to mean you’re doing just swell with bush and what he’s doing.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

All of you conservative bloggers do is call Obama funny names and make wild accusations – sure signs of desperation. And all the McCain campaign is doing is lurching from gimmick to gimmick – *Gas Holiday *Drill,Baby,Drill *Sarah Palin *Suspending the Campaign *Ayers and terrorists *Joe The Plummer and ….(I probably missed some -help me out here.)
There is no coherent vision, no hope, no plan. In other words – empty.
Barak Obama and Joe Biden have been steady and coherent and they offer a vision of hope and a real plan for the future. They will make a great President and Vice-President.

Posted by: prohb | October 19, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

corporations first,
i’m self employed. actually i am doing better than i was during the clinton years.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Pauline and Bruce–About the birth certificate: How it works is, if the mother is a US citizen, her child is a US citizen. However, Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, and his birth certificate has been seen and proven authentic by factcheck.org and several other sources. He should not have to produce any other documents or oaths of allegiance. If his name were Samuel Johnson from Idaho and he was white there would be no issue. BTW, you are aware that John McCain was born in Panama and has no birth certificate, right?

Posted by: Show-Me Mom | October 19, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

If you believe Obama is going to give you a tax break you’re not as bright as you sound. Come mid next year (i agree he will win) he will claim that W handed him an economy so bad that he can’t afford to lower taxes. In fact everything that goes bad over the next four years nobama will blame on bush. He will not take responsibility. How do I know…every time he’s had to backtrack it was only after irrefutable evidence made him. He’s not a man…but what politician is.
Posted by: David | Oct 18, 2008 11:48:14 PM
—————————————-
Show me ANY republican that has taken responsibility for the financial mess they’ve created?
Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | Oct 18, 2008 11:53:08 PM
—————————————-
David, still waiting for a answer. Has the cat got your tongue?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Marianne,
You are such a racist – but it is no wonder when you listen to such a biased news source as FoxNews. They are not news – they are brainwashers and far right extremists. John McCain was involved with terrorists and Acorn also – so he should be investigated as well. He also is suppressing unsavory information about his POW status. Don’t believe all the trash from blogs and FoxNews – learn that facts.

Posted by: marty | October 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Thank God the libs don’t stoop to name calling and wild accusations. ta-dum.

Posted by: Whew | October 19, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

I am amazed at the stupidity in this country. How in the hell do people think wealthy people got wealthy? By working the middle class into the ground to make enough money to send their companies overseas. The majority of the complainers are broke and have always been broke they just want to arrogant to face it.
If you think all the billions we send to other countries isn’t welfare you’ve been drinking the GOP cocktails to long.

Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

prohb,
I think if you look back over these blogs.you’ll see the “funny names” are McBush, McSame, etc. making fun of mccains ethnic name. messiah is a name Farrakahn used to describe obama

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

corporations first,
i’m self employed. actually i am doing better than i was during the clinton years.
Posted by: zeke | Oct 19, 2008 12:26:12 AM
—————————————
How long do you think that can continue when everybody else is struggling under Bush and the republicans?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Here’s some common sense facts:Deficit Spending
by hilzoy
Paul Krugman in the NYT:
“While the manic-depressive stock market is dominating the headlines, the more important story is the grim news coming in about the real economy. It’s now clear that rescuing the banks is just the beginning: the nonfinancial economy is also in desperate need of help.
And to provide that help, we’re going to have to put some prejudices aside. It’s politically fashionable to rant against government spending and demand fiscal responsibility. But right now, increased government spending is just what the doctor ordered, and concerns about the budget deficit should be put on hold. (…)
There’s a lot the federal government can do for the economy. It can provide extended benefits to the unemployed, which will both help distressed families cope and put money in the hands of people likely to spend it. It can provide emergency aid to state and local governments, so that they aren’t forced into steep spending cuts that both degrade public services and destroy jobs. It can buy up mortgages (but not at face value, as John McCain has proposed) and restructure the terms to help families stay in their homes.
And this is also a good time to engage in some serious infrastructure spending, which the country badly needs in any case. The usual argument against public works as economic stimulus is that they take too long: by the time you get around to repairing that bridge and upgrading that rail line, the slump is over and the stimulus isn’t needed. Well, that argument has no force now, since the chances that this slump will be over anytime soon are virtually nil. So let’s get those projects rolling.
Will the next administration do what’s needed to deal with the economic slump? Not if Mr. McCain pulls off an upset. What we need right now is more government spending — but when Mr. McCain was asked in one of the debates how he would deal with the economic crisis, he answered: “Well, the first thing we have to do is get spending under control.”
If Barack Obama becomes president, he won’t have the same knee-jerk opposition to spending. But he will face a chorus of inside-the-Beltway types telling him that he has to be responsible, that the big deficits the government will run next year if it does the right thing are unacceptable.
He should ignore that chorus. The responsible thing, right now, is to give the economy the help it needs. Now is not the time to worry about the deficit.”
Paul Krugman doesn’t need any validation from me, but: he’s exactly right. I have been horrified by the number of people who have said that now would be a good time for us to cut back on government spending. This is crazy. I mean: under normal circumstances, I am a deficit hawk. (Even now, I think it’s a great time to go through the budget and eliminate pointless and wasteful subsidies and programs.) But these are not normal circumstances. We are heading into a serious recession. We need to do what we can to get the economy moving again. And fiscal stimulus is exactly the way to do this.
Saying that we need to cut back on spending at this point is like saying to someone who has just been diagnosed with a treatable form of cancer, and to whom people are willing to lend money: look, you’ve just spent a whole lot of money on the operation to remove your tumor; you just can’t afford the chemo and radiation that your doctors recommend. Time to tighten your belt! Time to retrench!
To which the obvious answer is: putting my plan to buy a new car on hold is one thing. But saving money by not going through chemo and radiation is insane. This is exactly the same. And when debate moderators ask questions like this:
“What are you going to have to give up, in terms of the priorities that you would bring as president of the United States, as a result of having to pay for the financial rescue plan?”
The appropriate response is: we are going to have to get our budget deficits under control. But this is absolutely the wrong time to do it. We need to get through the present crisis first.
I especially do not want to hear about the need to stop spending from anyone who favored the Bush tax cuts. Anyone who favored running deficits in good times for the sake of tax cuts that overwhelmingly benefitted the rich has no standing whatsoever to object to desperately needed stimulus when we’re heading into the most serious recession most of us can remember. Anyone who supported the Bush tax cuts cannot credibly say that she objects to deficits per se. Nor can she say, as I do, that she favors fiscal responsibility in general, but thinks that there are circumstances in which something else takes priority: there is no credible economic theory that I’m aware of that says that we should run deficits when times are good.
The only reason to favor the Bush tax cuts but oppose deficit spending now is because the Bush tax cuts overwhelmingly favored the wealthy, whereas the most effective forms of economic stimulus tend to be directed more towards the poor and the middle class. But that’s no reason at all.
This is not rocket science. It’s bog-standard Keynesian economics. People who comment on economics and politics should either make some effort to understand it or hold their peace.
Posted by hilzoy at 12:46 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (76) | TrackBack (0)

Posted by: devilkev | October 19, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Mariann Pepitone I see you are posting your old racist stuff, again. I have seen you post moe than once about Obama dying. You are a digrace. And the rally – take the time to look at the pictures – WHITE people by the thousands in St. Loius – they are now estimating OVER 100,000 thousand people turned out. And Saturday evening, a crowd estimated at more than 75,000 thronged the Liberty Memorial near downtown Kansas City for an Obama rally. Lok at the pictures – WHITE people all over the place. Put your sunglasses on – the pictures may be too bright for you.

Posted by: sandy | October 19, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

zeke – well isn’t that nice – you are doing so well. However, do not contract a terminal illness, do not become involved in a horrifc accident that lays you up for months, do not become the victim of crime……you will see how fast your life can turn around….and that medical insurance you thought you had that was so good – NOT!

Posted by: sandy | October 19, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Mariann Pepitone I see you are posting your old racist stuff, again. I have seen you post moe than once about Obama dying. You are a digrace. And the rally – take the time to look at the pictures – WHITE people by the thousands in St. Loius – they are now estimating OVER 100,000 thousand people turned out. And Saturday evening, a crowd estimated at more than 75,000 thronged the Liberty Memorial near downtown Kansas City for an Obama rally. Lok at the pictures – WHITE people all over the place. Put your sunglasses on – the pictures may be too bright for you.
Posted by: sandy | Oct 19, 2008 12:35:43 AM
—————————————-
I read on other post here at ABC that Mariann Pepitone moved from Gage Park in Chicago,IL to Cicero,IL both have a long history of racial hatred of Blacks. So you can tell her mentality from where she has and currently lives.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

The St. Louis area is not all black and it was the police department who gave the estimates on the crowd, not the Obama campaign. The city of St. Louis has a large minority population but the suburbs and surrounding areas are a mix of all races.
It sounds like many are scared that there will be history made. He has a better plan. I have not heard a good plan from McCain, just the same things that Bush has said.

Posted by: Show-Me Mom | October 19, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

North Carolina has tunred BLUE. Carolina is Obama country. I am truly worried about the mental health of some of these posters when they have to accept that Americans of all religions, colors and income levels have come together to finally get a smart president. Obama-Biden 08 – go NC

Posted by: krissyinncarolina | October 19, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

John McCain DOES NOT know or care about working people, he has NEVER had to actually pay for college, or find a job (all those things he got from his family, and family contacts: His family paid for him to go to private school, his family found him a government job after he left the military. And John McCain HAS NEVER had to worry about paying his bills, he has a rich wife whose millions he lives off, whose 7 houses he can live in at anytime, without worrying about how to pay his mortgage. Nor does John McCain have to worry about to buy gas for the 13 cars he). John McCain does not know what it feels like to not be able to find a job, or have to work two jobs and go to college at the same time, or what it feels like to leave school having thousands of dollars in student loans that you have to pay after you graduate from college. John McCain does not know what it feels like to be anxious about not being able to pay your rent or mortgage, because your boss has just laid off hundreds of people, including yourself. Or not be able to find a job, and have to consider leaving town, and your family just so you can find a job, and find a way to support your family. John McCain has never had to worry about how to feed his kids, and pay his rent, or mortgage, or how to buy gas for the car which you need to drive to work, because there are no jobs nearby, and if you don’t drive to work you will lose your job.
John McCain has NO IDEA, and does not care what the middle class struggles are, he has voted 19 times against raising the minimum wage, and John McCain doesn’t believe that women should get paid the same as men for doing the same job (which is just sad, especially when there are millions, and millions of single moms who have to raise their children alone, with no help from the father, and these women are sadly, making less than a man for doing the same job). The fact is:
John McCain has NEVER lived a middle class lifestyle, and his parents DID NOT live a middle class life style either, so John McCain has NO CLUE what the middle class go through, what issues they and their families face everyday. John McCain voting 19 times against raising the minimum wage is all you need to look at to see that John McCain has NO CLUE what the poor and the middle class go through in this country!

Posted by: Lisa | October 19, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

The republicans and there robber baron pals on wall street have stripped this country of its wealth. The best practices advise that wall street gives to American companies is to outsource off shore to cut cost. I’m Charles the IT guy and I lost my job September 10th 2008. I can’t call the government for a bailout to cover my losses. The job prospects are slim. So, I say Obama Yes!

Posted by: Charle Holmes Jr. | October 19, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

REPUBLICANS ARE AS SMART AS BUSH, MCCAIN AND PALIN! THE APPLE DOES NOT FALL FAR FROM THE TREE! THEY DO NOT SEE GIVING 100 BILLION TO AIG, LEHMAN BROTHERS, FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC IS “RICH FOLKS WELFARE.” WHEN WE GAVE OUT BILLIONS OUT TO CHRYSLER, GMAC, S& L SAVINGS & LOAN, THIS IS “CORPORATE WELFARE.” IT WAS TAXPAYERS MONEY WE GAVE TO THESE “CROOKS.” NOW WERE ARE GIVING AWAY ANOTHER 800 BILLION TO BAIL OUT MORE RICH CROOKS, WHICH IS “CORPORATE WELFARE.” bUT, WHEN IT COMES TO BAILING OUT OR RESCUING THE MIDDLE CLASS, OR COMMON EVERYDAY JOE, REPUBLICANS ARE DEMONIZING ANY EFFORT! WE NOW KNOW WHOSE SIDE THEY ARE ON, DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THEIR “SOCIALIST” PROPAGANDA! UNDER THE REPUBLICANS THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICH AND POOR ALWAYS GREW BY LEAPS AND BOUNDS, AND NOW THE MIDDLE CLASS IS DISAPPEARING!WE, NEED AN INTELLIGENT, WISE, DIPLOMATIC, SKILLED PLITICIAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHO HAS THE JUDGMENT TO LEAD AMERICA BACK TO PROMISE. JUST A THOUGHT, I HAVEN’T HEARD THESE SOCALLED BORN AGAIN CONSERVATIVES SCORCHING, BURNING AND CONDEMING JESUS CHRIST AND HIS APOSTLES FOR WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION! EVENTHOUGH, I DO NO BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT BARACK OBAMA IS DOING! ANY LUNATIC CAN SEE THAT!

Posted by: Every Wilson | October 19, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Alex, I didn’t realize how out of touch McCain supporters were as well! I hope you didn’t take all night to write that peice of crap post! No your cheap a** probably copy and pasted fro Fox News blogs.
I love me some Hussien!
Obama/Biden 08- Get used to it people!

Posted by: Obama 4 prez | October 19, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

On “Joe the plumber” from obsidianwings:Spreading The Wealth
by hilzoy
Over the weekend, I noticed that the conservative blogs were up in arms about Obama’s statement that “when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” Having seen the actual video, I thought this was pretty silly. But now that John McCain has started misrepresenting what Obama actually said, I thought it might be a good idea to get clear about this.
Regrettably, ABC News does not let me embed their video, or even copy the relevant parts of their transcript. The video of Obama’s entire conversation, along with the transcript, is here. I urge anyone who is bothered by what Obama said to go watch or read it. Here’s the gist:
Joe the plumber asks: wouldn’t I, a guy who is thinking of buying a business with a little over $250,000 in revenue, pay more under Obama’s plan? After Obama explains what his plan does, Joe says: look, I have worked hard, and I’m just getting taxed more and more. Obama replies: well, there are two ways of looking at it. One is that you’ve worked hard, you’re successful, and now you’re being penalized for your success. But here’s another: you were probably working just as hard earlier, when you were starting out. And under my plan, you would have gotten more money then, and so you would have been able to save more, and you would have gotten to where you are today more quickly.
Obama then points out that taxes have been cut a lot for people who are doing well, but that ordinary folks are not doing nearly so well — in fact, their average income has gone down over the last eight years. And (after a bit about the flat tax) he says:
“For folks like me who have worked hard, but frankly also been lucky, I don’t mind paying just a little bit more than the waitress that I just met over there who’s — things are slow and she can barely make the rent.
My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody. If you’ve got a plumbing business, you’re going to be better off if you’ve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody, and I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
This is what John McCain was referring to last night when he said:
“You know, when Sen. Obama ended up his conversation with Joe the plumber — we need to spread the wealth around. In other words, we’re going to take Joe’s money, give it to Sen. Obama, and let him spread the wealth around.
I want Joe the plumber to spread that wealth around. You told him you wanted to spread the wealth around.”
But that’s just not what Obama said. He did not say that he wanted to spread Joe’s wealth around. He certainly did not say that he thought he was entitled to simply expropriate Joe’s wealth and distribute it to poor people, like Robin Hood. He said he wanted to spread the wealth: i.e., to have a tax code that is less skewed towards the wealthy. That’s Obama’s radical idea: progressive taxation.
Hand me my smelling salts!
If any change in people’s proportionate tax burdens counts as expropriating the money of those who end up paying a greater share and giving it to those who pay a lower one, then any President who has ever enacted changes in the tax code has expropriated people’s wealth. George Bush, for instance: in 2004, his tax cuts gave a 2.3% increase in after-tax income to the middle 20%, but a 6.3% increase to millionaires. This shift of tax burdens from the rich to the poor is obviously just an attempt to take poor people’s money and “spread” it to rich people.* And Ronald Reagan: he raised payroll taxes while cutting the top marginal rates: more expropriation!
Moreover, Reagan signed the 1986 tax reform bill into law: that bill eliminated a lot of corporate tax loopholes that had allowed some major corporations to pay “little or nothing in income taxes”. In other words, these corporations’ share of taxes went from zero (or near zero) to the same rate as other corporations, for no better reason than some misguided notion of “fairness.” Socialist expropriation!
And don’t even get me started on the monstrous socialist transfer of wealth that increases in the child tax credit or education credits involve. Socialist, the lot of them.
Changing the tax code in such a way that the proportional burdens of different groups of people also change is not socialism. It’s just a change in tax policy. Someone might say: but Bush’s tax cuts didn’t raise anyone’s taxes, so he can hardly be expropriating anything. This is wrong: by increasing the deficit, Bush’s tax cuts will cause us all to pay more later, and will also lower our standard of living over time. There is no free lunch.

Posted by: devilkev | October 19, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

McCain/Palin = Corporations First and Show-Me Mom: Glad to know that there are bloggers with heads on their shoulders and a thinking, rational brain inside. Much of the rhetoric against Senator Obama is that some people cannot admit that they are racist so they hide the fact with unfounded rhetoric from the likes of Hannity, Rush, and Faux News.

Posted by: sandy | October 19, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Great Marty, give it to him.
2008 Obama/Biden – not long now :-)

Posted by: Aussie | October 19, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

JimmyTMac, you sir is an idiot!
It`s simple maths……
Mc Cain favours the rich as proven by the last 8 years of bush policies which he has supported and wants to continue.
Obama supports you. The ordinary Joe, 95% of Americans, not the wealthy 5%. So ask yourself? Do you earn more than $250 000 a year, if so, you should vote for Mc Cain otherwise, you just don`t get it.
O and by the way, it’s not welfare because you need to pay taxes to get tax breaks in the first place. Don`t get confused by the Mc Cain propaganda machine.
Stick to the facts and understand who favours you. If you are going to vote for Mc Cain, vote for Mc Cain for the right reasons. Just remember that Mc Cain fights for the wealthy 5% of America but needs the support of the rest of us to do that.
In the end we have made the rich richer in the last 8 years, we have tried it the Republican way, it`s time for a change.

Posted by: Mc Bush no more | October 19, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

“Promises are just that..promises. we’ll see if barack hussein osama follows thru.”
written by Zeke
I like it Zeke, seem like you have come to the reality that the Black Muslim Arab Communist terroristic ciggarette smoker is going to be the President. I still love me some Hussein! He will follow through. We will push on as Americans- no matter how many people like yourself try to divide us.
Obama/Biden 08- Get used to it people!
It’s America reborn baby. Good thing we are pro-choice.

Posted by: Obama 4 Prez | October 19, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

REPUBLICANS ARE AS SMART AS BUSH, MCCAIN AND PALIN! THE APPLE DOES NOT FALL FAR FROM THE TREE! THEY DO NOT SEE GIVING 100 BILLION TO AIG, LEHMAN BROTHERS, FANNIE MAE AND FREDDIE MAC IS “RICH FOLKS WELFARE.” WHEN WE GAVE OUT BILLIONS OUT TO CHRYSLER, GMAC, S& L SAVINGS & LOAN, THIS IS “CORPORATE WELFARE.” IT WAS TAXPAYERS MONEY WE GAVE TO THESE “CROOKS.” NOW WERE ARE GIVING AWAY ANOTHER 800 BILLION TO BAIL OUT MORE RICH CROOKS, WHICH IS “CORPORATE WELFARE.” bUT, WHEN IT COMES TO BAILING OUT OR RESCUING THE MIDDLE CLASS, OR COMMON EVERYDAY JOE, REPUBLICANS ARE DEMONIZING ANY EFFORT! WE NOW KNOW WHOSE SIDE THEY ARE ON, DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THEIR “SOCIALIST” PROPAGANDA! UNDER THE REPUBLICANS THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICH AND POOR ALWAYS GREW BY LEAPS AND BOUNDS, AND NOW THE MIDDLE CLASS IS DISAPPEARING!WE, NEED AN INTELLIGENT, WISE, DIPLOMATIC, SKILLED PLITICIAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE WHO HAS THE JUDGMENT TO LEAD AMERICA BACK TO PROMISE. JUST A THOUGHT, I HAVEN’T HEARD THESE SOCALLED BORN AGAIN CONSERVATIVES SCORCHING, BURNING AND CONDEMING JESUS CHRIST AND HIS APOSTLES FOR WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION! EVENTHOUGH, I DO NO BELIEVE THIS IS WHAT BARACK OBAMA IS DOING! ANY LUNATIC CAN SEE THAT!

Posted by: Every Wilson | October 19, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

We are living in the 21st century, the year 2008 and the whole world is looking at US!!!!
Rep. Lewis is absolutely right when he says that this presidential race reminds him of the Civil Rights Era!!!
I predict that in ten years, racism will be dead!!!!
Nov. 4th = Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 19, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

One thing for sure, typing in all caps sure makes you look smart.

Posted by: Whacko | October 19, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

sandy,
i was asked how i was doing financially, not bragging,it could always be better. i hope you don’t really wish ill to me because i have a different political view. i hope you dont contract a terminal illness either.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

McCain/Palin = Corporations First and Show-Me Mom: Glad to know that there are bloggers with heads on their shoulders and a thinking, rational brain inside. Much of the rhetoric against Senator Obama is that some people cannot admit that they are racist so they hide the fact with unfounded rhetoric from the likes of Hannity, Rush, and Faux News.
Posted by: sandy | Oct 19, 2008 12:51:43 AM
—————————————-
Sandy, many Obama supporters realize republican supporters have a leg to stand on discussing issues. Therefore, they resort to racist and personal attacks on Obama. That might have worked if Bush & Co hadn’t ruined the country. Bust since he has, I see Obama winning by a large margin.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

McCain/Palin = Corporations First and Show-Me Mom: Glad to know that there are bloggers with heads on their shoulders and a thinking, rational brain inside. Much of the rhetoric against Senator Obama is that some people cannot admit that they are racist so they hide the fact with unfounded rhetoric from the likes of Hannity, Rush, and Faux News.
Posted by: sandy | Oct 19, 2008 12:51:43 AM
—————————————-
Sandy, many Obama supporters realize republican supporters have NO leg to stand on discussing issues. Therefore, they resort to racist and personal attacks on Obama. That might have worked if Bush & Co hadn’t ruined the country. Bust since he has, I see Obama winning by a large margin.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

is it possible to disagree with Obama without being racist?

Posted by: obama=socialism | October 19, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

is it possible to disagree with Obama without being racist?
Posted by: obama=socialism | Oct 19, 2008 1:13:24 AM
—————————————
Is it possible to support Obama without being racist?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

McCain is a Republican, “The Party of Corporate Values!”

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Obama’s “Tax” Plan: SOCIALISM
40% of America does not pay taxes and Obama wants to give those people more of YOUR money. It’s part of his “share the wealth effort.” Why work? There is no incentive under Obama. Take from those who realize the American dream and give to those who will appreciate Obama’s socialist dream—-with no sweat or effort. The Wall Street Journal lays it all out. It’s not a “tax” cut—it’s welfare. When 40% of Americans don’t pay taxes, it’s impossible to give 95% a tax cut.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html
Additionally, Obama has said McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time and sometimes says 4 out of 5 times (as said during the debates). Can one of his disciples please let him know that “4 out of 5″ equals 80%. It helps me understand his math on the 95% welfare effort though.

Posted by: George Steph of ABC Loves Obama | October 19, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

i havent seen racist accusations of obama supporters, only mccain supporters. I think it’s very possible to support Obama without being a racist, just as you can be against him without being a racist. I disagree with his politics, just as I disagree with the politics of Ted Kennedy & Nancy Pelosi.

Posted by: obama=socialism | October 19, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

is it possible to disagree with Obama without being racist?
Posted by: obama=socialism | Oct 19, 2008 1:13:24 AM
********************************
Yes, you can disagree as long it is done respectful and with common sense!!!
Nov. 4th = Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 19, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

I was called a racist when I used his name, Barack Hussein Obama, in a comment. It’s his NAME! If using his names is racist, his parents would be at fault.

Posted by: zeke | October 19, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I have a couldn’t agree with you more stopthemaddness about who takes the office, our taxes are going to go up. What I don’t understand is why OUR lovely elected officals in Washington can’t seem to control themselves and actually live within the United States means. This might mean that Congress can’t give themselves a pay raise like they do every year. I think, WE the American voters should demand that ALL elected officials in Washington should have to pay 20% of their medical insurance. I don’t know why neither candidate has address the issue about our nations borders. Here is another way to save us, the hard working middle class people, a few tax dollars….
$11 to 22 billion dollars are spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year. $2.2 billion dollars spent each year on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, free school breakfast & lunces for illegals. $2.5 billion per yr on Medicaid for illegals, $12 billion per yr on primary & secondary education. $17 billion for education for American born children of illegas. $3 million a day to incarcerate illegals. 30% of all Federal Prisons immates are illegals. 2007 US SENATE voeted to extend Social Security Benefits to Illegal Aliens beginning in 2008. Both Obama & McCain voted YES. In fact 38 Dems voted YES and 9 Republicans voted YES. So Washington, here is a way to balance out the budget Secure our borders and kick out the illegals, this would save America $383 billion dollars a year…..

Posted by: 55Mariposa | October 19, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I’m positive we’ll be in big trouble if Obama wins.
Posted by: zeke | Oct 19, 2008 12:03:29 AM
—————————————-
I am positive you will be…lol
Enough to the politics of taking from the poor and giving to wealthy. If the last eight years have proven anything, it just doesn`t work. Yeah sure you might like the bush economic policies that favour the wealthy only….but the rest of us want to balance the books again. Remember the Clinton years…. America was doing great…compare that to today….
I don`t want to be lied to for another four years.
Remember all those Republican promises 2000/2004
- Cut spending????? = Iraq…10 billion a month + more spending than in the Clinton years… (Fact)
- More jobs…..?????? We have lost more jobs in the last 8 years since the great depression.
- Health care????? Don`t get me started on that one….
- Foreign policy????? We have lost respect globally and what happened to taking care of business….bin laden is still out there.
- National debt???? we where in the green when the republican took office, now look where we are….it`s worst than ever.
Not to mention all the lies P bush has feed us about…..weapons of mass d ????? The real weapon was and is the republican economic policies, which Mc Bush supported and still supports…….
Enough is enough!!!!!
I get sick thinking about what has happened to this great country in the last 8 years…..
Time for a change
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Mulder without scully | October 19, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

After a great victory
The clever one shall fall.
Behind a shroud, the nation mourns
Night and day have met.

Posted by: Nostradamus | October 19, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Mulder without scully
***********************
Well said!!!!
I can not take another 4 yrs. of McBush policies!!!!
Enough is ENOUGH!!!!
Nov. 4th = Obama/Biden08

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 19, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

I don`t care much for Obama, but I will vote for him come Nov 4th.
WHY?
One word…..PALIN.
Obama 08

Posted by: Just say No to Mad dog Palin | October 19, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

It surprises me that “socialism” is still viewed as THE GREAT EVIL in America and all anyone has to do to evoke a thoughtless knee-jerk response of fear and outrage from most Americans is simply speak the “word”. Do you not realize that all western countries are socialist democracies to some extent. Your greatest supporter in the Iraq war is England which is a very socialist country (with universal health care).
Obama is not introducing a new concept when he says “redistribute the wealth”.
You already have income tax and social programs in place. He simply wants to adjust the numbers and expand some pragrams to benefit the middle and lower classes at the expense of the wealthy and suddenly the sky is falling and communism is ready to sweep the country?
Get real.

Posted by: JV in Canada | October 19, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Good Morning people. looks like the Democrats are in the building. Beautiful. glorious. looks like they have the republicans in their place.

Posted by: depblkman | October 19, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

For those not familiar with McShrub Loony-Right welfare plan for the OIL CO’s and his related radical wealth plan, for those in the 5% UPPER INCOME LEVEL, here is a summary that even an obnoxious sycophant might understand (provide somebody reads it to them very, very S-L-O-W-L-Y ):
MCSHRUB WILL DESTROY THE MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING CLASS AND MAKE THE OIL CO’S AND 5% INCOME EARNERS TAX FREE WHILE CHARGING THE WORKING CLASS WITH ALL OF THE BURDENS !!!
GOT IT ????????
THEN GO OUT AND VOTE WHILE YOU CAN !!!!!!
OBAMA-BIDEN 08 !!!!!!!!

Posted by: skyglider2008 | October 19, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Nostradamus:
never ending day comes
night will never fall
black is white and white is black
old will pass as new

Posted by: depblkman | October 19, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

S. Palin:
As Putin rears his head and comes
Into the air space of the United States of America
Where– where do they go?
It’s Alaska

Posted by: Rudy | October 19, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Don’t let history repeat itself. When the German economy collapsed in the 1930′s, the youth of the country rallied around a charasmatic politician named ADOLPH HITLER and elected him to institute “change”.
Be careful what you ask for. When you ask for change, you may get more change than you expect. Obama would have both houses of congress in his hip pocket with majorities large enough to prevent filibusters from any opposition, and would be able to name 2 new liberal judges to the Supreme Court. Liberals will run amok as King Obama will have complete control. Obama’s policies will encourage numerous government regulations.
If you want the government to redistribute wealth and take care of you, then I guess OB is your guy. If you want to preserve your freedom, individuality, and a balanced government vote MCCAIN/PALIN!

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Bush gave tax cuts to the rich and jobs were still being shipped overseas. So, unless Americans are willing to work for cheap;jobs will continue to be lost. Some people only care about money and there is nothing that you or I can do about it.

Posted by: Tlee | October 19, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

John McCain is a great candidate for the United States. He produced a lot of tapes for my country saying that the US is a rotten empire of white filth. We hope he wins so we can have a say in US government.

Posted by: VietnamforMcCain | October 19, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Republicans don’t want to spread the wealth around they want to give it all to the wealthy. That is why it is called wealth after all.

Posted by: VoiceOfReason | October 19, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

i have yet seen an employer gives up his vacation so his employees can have 1 week off.
Bush McCain tax cut will only handout more money to the Rich, so they can create job overseas and hire overseas. Don’t be delusional to think they will create jobs in the American. You want huge corporation to create jobs in America? Stop given them tax credits so they can move factories to other countries.

Posted by: bluespike | October 19, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

My question to my fellow democrats how many people in that 100,000 can actually vote, how many are registered, how many live in the state of Missouri, If I were a betting man I dont think 100,000 people standing outside are really going to matter, the fact is he will be like until he gets in then it will be just like GWB the media will turn on hime then the people will turn on hime. 100,000 people props in commericals it says a lot about Obama I will use you people for visuals that my campaign is stronger than yours cause I got 100,000 folks out here, I believe that when this election is over half of America wont like the President , Obama or Mccain, everytime Obama is in trouble the media comes running to the rescue. Remember this the media built up GWB 2000-2005 they will do the same to Obama build him up and if they dont get what they want he sink like a rock in the polls. Mark my words.

Posted by: Quintell | October 19, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

Alex H, since you are appparently too ignorant to help yourself, so the majority of American will determine your fate for you on 4 Novemeber and help you, while we help everyone else for the good of America. Sometimes it amazes me that some people are too dumb and set in their ancient, racist, stereotypical, biased and bigotted ways to try anything new and promising. Your mama probably forced you to eat your brocolli too, as you resisted, even though it was good for you and in your best interest. Well guess what Alex and the rest of America, Barack Obama is your brocolli serving, so eat up.

Posted by: Chris B | October 19, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

Why can’t you Libs get it? Obama’s plan to increase taxes on businesses & investors will discourage growth, increase unemployment, and increase inflation…not exactly a cure for a struggling economy.

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Mccain is so out of touch that he doesnt know the difference between a tax cut and welfare, he clearly is unintelligent, its not surprising given that he was kicked out from the schools he attended and ended at the bottom of his class, he is the one thats needs to be educated. Mccain is really dumb…True that!!

Posted by: johnny | October 19, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim of Kenyan origins who studied in Islamic schools and whose campaign may have been financed by people in the Islamic and African worlds, Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi said during a recent televised national rally. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
“There are elections in America now. Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama,” said Gadhafi in little-noticed remarks he made at a rally marking the anniversary of the 1986 U.S. air raid on his country. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The remarks, translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute, MEMRI, were aired on Al Jazeera in June. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
“All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” continued Gadhafi. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency. …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Posted by: Trevor Lightly | October 19, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

The Republicans tried to make fun of Barack Obama as a community organizer at their national convention in Minnesota, which I guess just goes to show how little Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have to fear from right-wing “humor.”
Now they’ve gone further: Now they’re attacking ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), one of the strongest, hardest-working, most dedicated community organizations in both Chicago and in 40 states across the U.S.
Why are they after ACORN? Well, I’m sure they’re going to come up with a lot of “reasons” in the coming days. But the real reason is obvious: Because ACORN, along with Project Vote, just announced that they had successfully registered 1.3 million poor people this year.
Get that? 1.3 million, including 148,000 in Pennsylvania, 152,000 in Florida, 217,000 in Michigan, and 238,000 in Ohio. No wonder the GOP is up in arms. They’re scared of too many poor people preparing to vote this year.
In the last week, the right wing has tried to blame ACORN for the collapse of the globalized financial system–yeah, that’s a viable argument. They got excited because they found a some possible fake registration forms in Florida, which predictably led to a bunch of whining from the party that stole an entire presidency from Al Gore by blocking vote counts, mischaracterizing voters as felons, refusing to recount entire counties, sending congressional staff down to riot and intimidate volunteer vote-counters, and topped it all off with the most partisan, badly-reasoned, illegitimate Supreme Court decision since Plessy v. Ferguson. A decision so illegitimate that the partisan majority, to their eternal discredit, themselves damned by writing into their own decision that it should never be used as a precedent for any other court ruling.
This week, the right-wing is hyperventilating because apparently Democratic election officials raided an ACORN office after they found the names of some Dallas Cowboy football players among the 80,000 new registration forms that ACORN helped to get done in Nevada.
Obviously it’s not right for a fake “Tony Romo” to be registered in Las Vegas, so someone was probably playing a not-very-funny joke, or trying to pad their registration numbers to get paid a little more money rather than doing the hard work in the hot Nevada sun that helping voters to register requires, or maybe a provocateur was setting up ACORN for some bad press. But remember the basic point–it’s not voter fraud unless someone shows up at the voting booth on election day and tries to pass himself off as “Tony Romo.” And who would try to do that? No one is going to be that stupid.
The truth is, the main voter fraud efforts going on in my lifetime–and I was born the week of the Selma march in 1965–have been repeated conservative attempts, far too many of them successful, to demonize and suppress the vote of African-Americans and Latinos in election after election, a history for which former RNC Chair Ken Mehlman actually apologized a few years ago, while promising the GOP would no longer engage in such tactics.
So they stole an election from Gore, made the Department of Justice into an outfit for partisan hacks, allowed New Orleans to drown, lied us into a war against a country that did not threaten us, replaced science with bad ideology, indebted our grandchildren to China, and turned our banking system into a deregulated casino–but thank the Lord that “Tony Romo” will not be able to sneak in to vote in Nevada next month.
This time, there are already fake flyers mysteriously appearing on the streets of minority areas of Philadelphia, illegal voter purges in numerous states, “caging” tricks, threats of using home foreclosure lists to strike voters from the rolls, and “black box” electronic vote-counting systems under the control of private companies–and we haven’t even gotten to election day!
Meanwhile, I say thank you, ACORN. Thank you, Project Vote, for taking our democracy seriously enough to try to include 1.3 million more poor people in a more perfect union.

Posted by: Rev. Ike | October 19, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

It amazes me that Republicans are more interested in playing the game of politics than actually governing. It is fairly obvious by the posting that something if going on and my guess is that a Republican operation is trying to stiffle the postings of average people by posting angry anti-Obama tirades like the one that refers to “Hussien”. This election is not about tax cuts and this election is not about welfare. This election is also not about terrorism, oil drilling or Bill Ayers. It is not about the economy. This election is about the American people being very concerned about the future and looking for a President that can lead them in a brighter direction. Barack Obama has offered a direction. John McCain has not. It is that simple. The Republican party is outa ideas other than how to win an election by any means necessary. I hope that we aren’t confused by their latest tactics.

Posted by: slatonjay | October 19, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

You know this voter fraud issue is very important. If Obama is elected, I think he should put safeguards in place to prevent it. For example, he could have an implant placed in each citizens hand, or maybe forehead, that would identify the citizen definitively for voting purposes. Heck, these implants could also be used for other purposes, like keeping records of available funds to allow the person to buy and sell things. Just a thought.

Posted by: Chas | October 19, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Dear Red States
We’ve decided we’re leaving. We intend to form our own country, and
we’re taking the other Blue States with us.
In case you aren’t aware, that includes Hawaii, Oregon,
Washington , Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and
all the Northeast. We believe this split will be beneficial to the
nation, and especially to the people of the new country of New
California.
To sum up briefly: You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave
states. We get stem cell research and the best beaches. We get
Elliot Spitzer. You get Ken Lay.
We get the Statue of Liberty. You get Dollywood.
We get Intel and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
We get Harvard. You get Ole’ Miss.
We get 85 percent of America ‘s venture capital and entrepreneurs.
You get Alabama .
We get two-thirds of the tax revenue, you get to make the red
states pay their fair share.
Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the
Christian Coalition’s, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a
bunch of single moms.
Please be aware that Nuevo California will be pro-choice and
anti-war, and we’re going to want all our citizens back
from Iraq at once. If you need people to fight, ask your
evangelicals. They have kids they’re apparently willing to send to
their deaths for no purpose, and they don’t care if you don’t show
pictures of their children’s caskets coming home. We do wish you
success in Iraq , and hope that the WMDs turn up, but we’re not
willing to spend our resources in Bush’s Quagmire.
With the Blue States in hand, we will have firm control of 80
percent of the country’s fresh water, more than 90 percent of the
pineapple and lettuce, 92 percent of the nation’s fresh fruit, 95
percent of America’s quality wines (you can serve French wines at
state dinners) 90 percent of all cheese, 90 percent of the high-tech
industry, most of the U.S. low-sulfur coal, all living redwoods,
sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools, plus
Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.
With the Red States, on the other hand, you will have to cope with
88 percent of all obese Americans (and their projected health care
costs), 92 percent of all U.S. mosquitoes, nearly 100 percent of the
tornadoes, 90 percent of the hurricanes, 99 percent of all Southern
Baptists, virtually 100 percent of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh,
Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.
We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.
Additionally, 38 percent of those in the Red states believe Jonah
was actually swallowed by a whale, 62 percent believe life is sacred
unless we’re discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44 percent
say that evolution is only a theory, 53 percent that Saddam was
involved in 9/11 and 61 percent of you crazy bastards believe you
are people with higher morals then we lefties.
By the way, we’re taking the good pot, too. You can have that dirt
weed they grow in Mexico.
Peace out,
Blue States

Posted by: Michael | October 19, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Alex H, you are quite a gas bag yourself, spouting hate names and lies. I guess you just don’t have the capacity to understand plain English or you have a really limited vocabulary. Obama’s tax plan DOES NOT raise taxes for anyone making under $250,000. If you do, your taxes will go up only 3% to the pre-Bush levels. Yes, someone has to pay for all the programs that Obama as well as McCain proposes. And raising taxes on the wealthiest tax payers is one way to do it. Most of these people hire accountants and attorneys to find loop holes to minimize their tax obligations (I know, I worked for a couple), so don’t feel too sorry for them. The rest of us working middle-class folk can use a break. And as Obama said, his tax credits will only go to WORKING citizens, so the unemployed need not apply.

Posted by: annaloh | October 19, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Obama will grow the government and steal more of our money. McCain will grow the government and steal more of our money. We are screwed either way. Oh yeah, Obama is not the messiah. Jesus is.

Posted by: same old same old | October 19, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am

annaloh-
Unfortunately, OB’s tax increases will stifle capital investment, increase unemployment, and increase inflation. In other words, it’s like bribing a child with sweets…sure, the candy tastes sweet, but then the kid has to visit the dentist and get drilled because his teeth rotted. A bribe is not worth the long-term effect. Obama’s tax plan would kill the already struggling economy.
Why can’t you people open your eyes and look at the cause/effect relationship instead of trying to tie McCain to someone else’s policies?
I’m telling you, change for change’s sake is not necessarily good. The change that OB would bring would be devestating!

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

I have yet to hear either candidate propose plans for a large cut in government spending and government bailouts and a large reduction in the size of government??? Until that occurs, there will NEVER be ANY chance of there being a balanced budget!!! Bigger government, larger budgets and increased dependence on government translates to job security for these and ALL government employees!!! Time to trim the herd and cut spending……………”NOW!!!”

Posted by: tom albright | October 19, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Just for the record, it’s actually $200K for single people and $250K for married. Here’s a good example of how increasing taxes on a higher class directly affects the little guy. I own a cabinet business with 10 employees. I work very long hours, six days a week, and make around $125K per year. Our typical client lives in a fairly expensive home in an upscale neighborhood in Southern California, and I would estimate about 90% of them are above that “$200K-250K” tax bracket. I don’t care so much about paying lower income tax, but what I do care about is how much business I’ll lose when the majority of my client base has a substantial tax increase placed on them. I’m anticipating laying off about 4 employees next year under Obama’s plan.

Posted by: Dave the Cabinetmaker | October 19, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

The right wingnuts are getting desperate, still spreading lie after lie on the blogs
Well it isn’t going to work this time. McShame has changed his colors so many times chemelons can’t even keep up. So all these neocons can do is spread lies and hate, but guess what this time it isn’t working.
The last eight years have been way to painful.

Posted by: hilodave | October 19, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

IRS Facts:
Half of all corporations paid No income tax under Republicans.
Corporate taxable income has dropped 700% under Republicans.
McCain says he will continue these policies, Obama will let the tax cuts expire.
CORPORATE AMERICA MUST NOW RESUME PAYING ITS FAIR SHARE TO PROTECT THE COUNTRY THAT ALLOWED THEM TO AMASS SUCH WEALTH, i.e. OIL COMPANIES.

Posted by: Chaz Prez | October 19, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

I am sorry dear Republican white faithful, the black man will rule over America this time. Take it or leave it. Please if you will not accept your fate as it is divinely arranged, get a visa to come and live in China, we are warm and hospitable at least for the next four years.

Posted by: chi | October 19, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am

ALEX H. When you purposefully refer to Obama using his middle name, you automatically get labeled a fear mongering lunatic, and nothing you say will be reach anyone but people already on your side.
Does anyone even know John McCain’s middle name? He has one, yet I never see anyone use it.

Posted by: Paul | October 19, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Here we go again – comment after comment from ‘hard working’ Americans, accusations that Obama’s supporters are all on Welfare while everyone voting for McCain works 26 hours a day … scratch the surface of any of these people, and there he is – Joe the Plumber. Not even qualified, hasn’t paid his back taxes, can’t even afford to buy the business he’s “frightened” of being taxed for!! “Don’t touch THEIR money” “Don’t give their taxes to people on Welfare” … Fat Cat Bankers getting bailed out to the tune of about a trillion dollars (and growing) isn’t a problem – just don’t give those deadbeats on welfare any more foodstamps…. Sad, sad people.

Posted by: chester burns | October 19, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Obama’s plan will severly tax small businesses that provide jobs for the “middle class” he says he wants to help. Higher taxes will result in loss of jobs and with the significant role small business plays in job creation our economy will decline even more and unemployment will rise. Small business is responsible for 93.5 percent of net new jobs since 1989.
As for the $250k threshold, a significant number of small businesses that employ people will be impacted. On behalf of the National Small Business Association, Public Opinion Strategies conducted a national Internet survey of 500 small and mid-sized business owners from February 15-25, 2008. To ensure results represented a proper distribution by company size for the small and midsized business market, the results were weighted by 2004 U.S. Census Bureau of the Census data. The sample of businesses surveyed is diverse and representative of the entire U.S. small business community
Below is a profile of the respondents. As indicated under the “Revenues for Most Recent Year” 38% made more the $500k, 26% made between $100k and $500k.
What you must remember is the distinction between nonemployers and employers. Nonemployers outnumber employers by about 3 to 1. Most nonemployers are part-time operations. In terms of economic impact, employer firms dominate; their total receipts are over 20 times the size of nonemployers’ receipts. In 2002, U.S. Census Bureau data counted 5.7 million
employers with $22 trillion in annual receipts and 17.6 million nonemployers with $770 billion in receipts. Although employers are a much smaller percentage of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s definition of small businesses they create the revenues and jobs that keep our economy going.
Unfortunately, the majority of Americans only hear Obama’s soundbite and don’t realize he most likely is putting their job at risk. What good is a tax cut for the middle class if you don’t have a job other than a welfare check from Obama. I’d rather keep my job.
Profile of Respondents
Number of Personnel
0 7%
1–4 54%
5–19 28%
20–99 9%
100–499 2%
Number of Years in Business
Less than 1 year 5%
1–3 years 11%
4–6 yeears 16%
7–10years 18%
11–15 years 13%
More than 16 years 38%
Revenues for Most Recent Fiscal Year
Less than $100K 35%
$100K–$500K 26%
$500K–$1M 14%
$1M–$5M 16%
$5M–$25M 5%
$25M–$75M 1%
$75M–150M 1%
More than $150M 1%
Location of Business
Northeast 23%
Midwest 22%
South 31%
West 24%
The entire survey can be viewed at http://www.nsba.biz/docs/2008bizsurvey.pdf

Posted by: cpa | October 19, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

There was a simple solution to this “drama” on another blog I just read a few moments ago. It kinda cuts thru all the fat and gets to the meat.
If you make $250,000 (or more) a year – vote for McCain. You will be better off.
If you make less than $250,000 – vote for Obama. You will be better off.
Now, let the best man win. Simple. I’m a Republican and I’m voting for Obama.

Posted by: Old Republican | October 19, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

I am a Ind. voting for Obama. If only McCain had not picked Palin and decided
to run an attack based campaine. Both Obama’s campaines,primary and Gen. election have been run smarter and with better decision making and management by Obama and his staff. McCain has been all over the field. Now I get robocalls hyping on Ayers. McCain you are turning off people and killing your chances. Obama through his campaines has shown better management, finance decisions, is more presidential in his presentations. Is a better communicator. Has picked a VP that acually could run the country if needed. All McCain and Palin can do is try to smear and swift boat Obama and guess what, its not working. Bush won using smear and fear tactics. Wont work this time. America is ready for change and Obama will be our ne Commander In Chief. Thank God.

Posted by: CW | October 19, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

I think the fact that both McKain and Obama are both putting forward tax cut plans at this time is ridiculous. We have the largest budget deficit in history. The Congress has been raising the national debt limit and with all of the current and future bailout plans I am certain the deficit and debt will be going higher still. I expect there to be more costly plans to stimulate growth and create jobs as the country appears to be headed into a deep recession. All politicians know how to do is promise you a tax cut but when (if) they give it to you they charge it (e.g. deficit finance to make up for the reduction in tax income). If interest rates on treasuries actually go up as the rest of the world decides that they’ve had enough of our debt, the cost of financing the deficit and the debt will skyrocket further. Tax cuts right now are a joke.

Posted by: Jack | October 19, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

WOW! You can sae the hate trikle down from the McCain campaign.

Posted by: Goodie | October 19, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

It is not surprising that Obama can draw 100,00 people. The people who get free stuff will always flock to the politicians who promise to give them more free stuff. When discussing the American Revolution, a Scottish-born British lawyer and writer Alexander Fraser Tytler (1747 – 1813), was attributed as saying. “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.” Americans reached that moment with FDR’s New Deal and have been tumbling down the path of self destruction every since. Today over half of the households in America receive a regular monthly check from the government and nearly half (44%) pay no income taxes at all. Just how long do you think we can continue on this path?

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

It is not surprising that Obama can draw 100,00 people. The people who get free stuff will always flock to the politicians who promise to give them more free stuff. When discussing the American Revolution, a Scottish-born British lawyer and writer Alexander Fraser Tytler (1747 – 1813), was attributed as saying. “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.” Americans reached that moment with FDR’s New Deal and have been tumbling down the path of self destruction every since. Today over half of the households in America receive a regular monthly check from the government and nearly half (44%) pay no income taxes at all. Just how long do you think we can continue on this path?

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Al Austin, a longtime, high-level Republican fundraiser from Tampa, today sent to his list of political contacts an e-mail containing a joke that refers to the assassination of Barack Obama.
When asked about the e-mail, Austin said it was a mistake and apologized and that he wouldn’t knowingly have circulated it. He said he planned to send an apology and retraction to the same e-mail list.
Al Austin/ Tribune file photo
The joke concerns a group of schoolchildren discussing the definition of “tragedy” as opposed to “great loss” or “accident.” The punch line comes when one child says that if an airplane carrying Obama and his wife, Michelle, “was struck by a ‘friendly fire’ missile and blown to smithereens, ” the event might be a tragedy “because it certainly wouldn’t be a great loss, and it probably wouldn’t be an accident either.”
Austin acknowledged sending the e-mail to his list of political contacts but said he forwarded it without fully reading it and didn’t know what it said. That list included at least two reporters.
According to the forwarding history on the e-mail, it had gone through at least two other individuals before being sent to Austin on Tuesday.
Austin, a prominent real estate developer long known as one of the state’s leading Republican campaign fundraisers, has served in recent years as finance chairman for both the national and state Republican parties.
This why I call them the repugnant party.
Go Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Shayla | October 19, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I love Obama’s fuzzy mathe here. So if people don’t pay any income tax we’ll give them back their “payroll” taxes, meaning their social security contribution. Then we’ll turn around and give them social security and SSI that they didn’t pay into. It’s still WELFARE Senator.

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election:
>
> CAPITAL GAINS TAX
>
> MCCAIN
> 0% on home sales up to $500,000
> per home (couples) McCain does not
> propose any change in existing
> home sales income tax.
>
> OBAMA
> 28% on profit from ALL home sales
>
> How does this affect you?
> If you sell your home and make a profit, you
> will pay 28% of your gain on taxes.
> If you are heading toward retirement
> and would like to down-size your
> home or move into a retirement
> community, 28% of the money you
> make from your home will go to taxes. This
> proposal will adversely affect the
> elderly who are counting on the income
> from their homes as part of their retirement income.
>
> DIVIDEND TAX
>
> MCCAIN 15% (no change)
>
> OBAMA 39.6%
>
> How will this affect you?
> If you have any money invested in stock
> market, IRA, mutual funds,
> college funds, life insurance, retirement
> accounts, or anything that pays
> or reinvests dividends, you will now
> be paying nearly 4 0% of the money
> earned on taxes if Obama become president.
> The experts predict that ‘higher
> tax rates on dividends and capital gains
> would crash the stock market yet
> do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.
>
> INCOME TAX
>
> MCCAIN (no changes)
>
> Single making 30K – tax $4,500
> Single making 50K – tax $12,500
> Single making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 60K- tax $9,000
> Married making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 125K – tax $31,250
>
> OBAMA
> (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
> Single making 30K – tax $8,400
> Single making 50K – tax $14,000
> Single making 75K – tax $23,250
> Married making 60K – tax $16,800
> Married making 75K – tax $21,000
> Married making 125K – tax $38,750
>
> Under Obama your taxes will
> more than double!
> How does this affect you? No explanation
> needed. This is pretty
> straight forward.
>
> INHERITANCE TAX
>
> MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
>
> OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax
>
> How does this affect you? Many families
> have lost businesses,
> farms and ranches, and homes
> that have
> been in their families
> for generations because they could not
> afford the inheritance tax.
> Those willing their assets to loved
> ones will not only lose them tothese taxes.
>
> NEW TAXES BEING PROPOSED BY OBAMA
>
> * New government taxes proposed on
> homes that are more than
> 2400 square feet
>
> * New gasoline taxes (as if
> gas weren’t high enough already)
>
> * New taxes on natural resources
> consumption (heating
> gas, water, electricity)
>
> * New taxes on retirement accounts
> and last but not least….
>
> * New taxes to pay for socialized medicine
> so we can receive the same
> level of medical care as other
> third-world countries!!!

Posted by: BLAHBHO | October 19, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

BLABHO Sure does look like Obama is looking out for the middle class. LOL.

Posted by: help us | October 19, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

McCains middle name is Sydney. Isnt that a girls name? Makes ya start to wonder about the sexual orientation of old Johnny boy. Sure, hes had wives but many homosexuals have had wives, even having children just as a cover for their internal struggles. I mean he did join the Navy after all, it wasnt the Marines, or the Army. Sydney harbors deep sexual frustrations from his repressed sexuality, you can bet on that. Sydney probably was affected by some of his boyhood chums and their preteen exploits out behind the house… You see what I mean folks? This is no different than them attacking Baracks middle name and making up things about him concerning his name. Its easy to do it, but its wrong to do it. Its the same schoolyard tactics that bullies used in grade school, and the conservatives are the same people. Schoolyard bullies you knew in grade school, became conservatives, and havent changed their tactics.

Posted by: Fairfax | October 19, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

This has to make you think a little bit, if not then keep your blinders on! If you can handle the truth then read on:
George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the economy was fine.
A little over two years ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
4) The DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +
5) American’s were buying new cars, taking cruises, vacations on the seas, living large! .
But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress & the DEMS took over control .
Yep–we got ‘CHANGE’ all right. In the PAST TWO YEARS:
1) Consumer confidence has plummeted ;
2) Gasoline is now at $4 a gallon & climbing!;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS & prices still dropping;
5) Tens of thousands of American homes are in foreclosure.
6) As I write, THE DOW is probing another low ~ 11,100–
$2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!
YEP, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE!…AND WE SURE GOT IT!!!….NOW OBAMA, the DEM’S CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT–AND THE POLLS SAY HE’S GONNA BE ‘THE MAN’–CLAIMS HE’S GONNA REALLY GIVE US CHANGE!!!….JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YA THINK YOU CAN STAND???…..

Posted by: Just-Me | October 19, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Dave the Cabinetmaker, if your clients are so cheap that they cant stand to pay an extra few hundred dollars in taxes, on the $250,000+ they make then they are complete morons, and not patriotic. Its simple mathematics people, but the republicans want you to believe obama is gonna take LOTS of your hard earned money. Its hundreds of dollars folks, not thousands and its still less than Clinton taxed you, and its a drop in the bucket compared to hundreds of thousands you are making. If you are patriotic then please dont be greedy. Its not really that much money per person. Lets be the America of old that wanted to help others and didnt NEED to hold onto every penney.

Posted by: Bobba | October 19, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I just don’t understand why if someone makes over $250,000 a year should have to pay a higher percentage in taxes. They already pay more taxes then someone, like memaking $50k a year. If they pay 25% and I pay 25% I am paying $12,500 and the person making $250k is paying $72,500. Now what is unfair about this?

Posted by: BLABHO | October 19, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

I am not voting for Obama because of his lack of experience, his liberal “tax and spend” voting record and I am afraid that if he is elected he will surround himself with radicals — as he seems to have done in the past. However these arguments about Obama’s birth and religion are absurd and were debunked months ago. His birth certificate has been posted upon the web and verified by the State of Hawaii. He has publicly stated his faith many times and was a member of a racist Afro-centrist Christian Church for 20 years. Even if he was a Muslim in his youth Christians should be shouting halleluiah at his conversion.
But I am concerned about his association with an unrepentant terrorist like Ayers and his lying about it to the American people. If it was just Obama’s close association with one radical individual maybe it would not be such a big deal. But Obama has a long history of associating with radicals who seem to despise the American way of life — Bill Ayers, Bernadette Dorn, Jeremiah Wright, Frank Davis, Rashid Khalidi, Michael Pfleger, Raila Odinga, Mike Klonsky, and who knows who else.

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Democrats compalin that companies are moving all of the jobs overseas and then they nominate a tax and spend anti-business socialist to be President. Great idea – raise business taxes. That’ll sure stop businesses from moving jobs overseas. NOT! I can’t believe that so many Americans are willing to vote themselves out of a job.

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

The Bush / McCain “trickle down” approach has resulted only in rich getting richer (hoarding their gains) and what “trickles” down is much like the old Yiddish saying that translates to, “Don’t pee on my back and tell me it’s raining.” Obama’s spread the wealth plan intends to give the middle a chance to catch up. Will it mean the rich like Cindy & John McCain can’t buy ther 13th house with cash…maybe. Where is the greater good? Vote for the Middle, Vote for Obama.

Posted by: Rick_VT | October 19, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

This election is about whether we will have a recession or a depression. There is an old economics joke about the difference between a recession and a depression. The punch line is that a recession is when you are out of work and a depression is when I am out of work. Last week I was talking with a friend who has a small business that employs about 20 people. He is pretty sure that times will be tough next year. He said that if McCain is elected he thinks things will turn around next year so he will try to hang on. However he believes that if Obama is elected his taxes will go up and his business will go down to the point where he will probably have to lay off about half his people. Then he made the remark that he would start with those employees with Obama stickers on their cars because they helped cause it. Many small business owners and professionals are very concerned about Obama’s tax and spend policies and making plans to cut back if he is elected. I can’t believe that so many American workers are willing to vote themselves out of a job.

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

I went to my doctor the other day. I was picking on him that his taxes would go up if Obama was elected. He didn’t crack a smile and just said I guess I’ll have to raise my rates. The people Obama plans to raise taxes on are our doctors, dentists, lawyers, pharmacists, and other professionals and successful small business owners who will simply raise their rates to cover their increased taxes. Think about it everyone. Who really pays for those tax increases?
Obama’s tax plan is to raise taxes on successful professionals, small business owners and investors. Those are the people who create most of the new jobs in America. Obama also says he will give a tax cut to 95% of Americans. How can he do that when more than 40% of Americans pay no taxes in the first place? Taxing upper income people and then sending money to people who didn’t pay anything to begin with is not a tax cut — it is the socialist policy of income redistribution.

Posted by: professorj | October 19, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Professorj, Again your trying to frighten people by insinuating that those with obama bumber stickers will be the first to be fired by your greedy corporate friend. Well let me be frightening too since this is near halloween, and all, and in the interests of fainess. You recall all the news stories that come out where the employee goes “crazy” and comes in and takes a pistol, or other beloved republican “tools” and shoots the boss? You better believe the Boss was a conservative who didnt care a bit about the employees and cared only for his money, and the poor employee had no option but to take their own life, and decided that as a last act they would take the @ssholes life as well. Afraid?

Posted by: Bobba | October 19, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Professorj, your doctor can try to raise his rates if he wants, but it will be difficult to do with socialized medicine.

Posted by: JJ | October 19, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Bringing more wealth to middle America means more wealth and money going to our small towns and schools. Middle America spends its money where it lives and on what’s important to their families. Rich America spends its money on over seas investments, on international-based gains. Ask yourself where the money is best for America… in our schools teaching our kids, in the local economy re-building our roads and bridges, in our retirement plans so after 40 years of teaching, building roads and fixing clogged drains we can afford to retire OR to foreign investments where only 2 percent of the American public actually has a better life.

Posted by: Rick_VT | October 19, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Uh the 95% that he speaks about are 95% of the working americans. Are you people stupid or what? Your no professor, professorj, unless you are referring to you professing republican agenda.

Posted by: JJ | October 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Joe the Plumber has become the focus of media attention, and perhaps that will be good for America. People will start to look at Obama and the Democratic party and see that they are going to tax us into ruin.
If Joe buys his plumbing company he will be paying 36% federal income tax right now. After Obama raises his federal income tax, he will be paying 39% federal income tax. 39%! Add to that state income tax, local taxes, sales taxes if applicable, taxes on his capital gains if any, taxes added on to utilities, and the list goes on and on.
It is time for another Boston Tea Party. We should call this one the Plumber’s Rebellion. Plumbers should clog the streets in front of government buildings demanding relief from unbridled taxes. All Americans who care about freedom and fair taxation will join you. This event should take place on November 4, 2008!

Posted by: Jack Jackson | October 19, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

JJ It is funny how Obama changed it to 95% of the working class after it was brought up to him that 40% of the people did not pay taxes. Then like always Obama changed his stance and said working people. Obama does not know if he is coming or going. He is caught on lie after lie maybe that is why he don’t answer questions anymore for the regular Joe or why he would not have the 10 town hall meetings he agreed to with McCain. Lie after Lie is Obama’s plan.

Posted by: blahBHO | October 19, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Jack Jackson, Joe the Plumber doesnt have the funds to buy a company, that was a lie to try and trip up Obama. Its been proven he is related to one of the keating 5 members, and was a plant from mccains campaign. He had no plans to buy any company. The increase you speak about would put the taxes back to where they were before W. gave his tax cuts for the walthy. The tax increase wont break america, it will be the same as when Clinton was in office. You remember, back when our country was in the black financially, before the republicans drove it into the dirt.

Posted by: grumpybumpy | October 19, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

And good luck with your rebellion, Im sure that will work out for you and the wealthy. Whens the last time the wealthy could stage a rebellion?

Posted by: grumpybumpy | October 19, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

grumpybumpy The point of Joe the Plumber is Obama is destorying the American dream of working hard and maybe someday to be able to make a business or make more then what you are now. With Obama’s spread the wealth why would people want to work when we will all be in the same social class if we work or don’t work. This will bring down the economy more then anything. Sociailism is not a way to build business or create jobs.

Posted by: blahBHO | October 19, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

blahbho, huh? How is rescinding the tax cut for the rich, and setting the level of taxes back to the level when Clinton was POTUS going to detroy america? America was actually strong back then. Bush has been the one who has destroyed america with his silly idea of trickle down economy. It doesnt work. Its called voodoo economics for a reason. If you work hard and make more than 250,000 dollars he will make you pay a few hundred more in taxes. How will that destroy you? If anything it might, if you were totally greedy, encourage you to make just under 200,000, which isnt anywhere near poverty level.

Posted by: grumpybumpy | October 19, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Not until reading media stories such as this, and throughout this Presidential election and the postings from those that feed into them did I realize how ignorant both the American media and the American public really is.

Posted by: pumphouseplus | October 19, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

BlahBHO. . . .great post on the tax breakdown. . .finally, someone lays out ALL of the tax changes and differences between Obama and McCain. Why doesn’t McCain use something like this? It would be a game changer. EVERYONE thinks they are getting a better tax deal across the board with Obama and no one knows about this. Is there a website, or somewhere you gathered this info from?

Posted by: Dave the Cabinetmaker | October 19, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

We may have a trillion dollar deficit and the polticians are thinking of more ways to redistribute money. Politicians are thieves. They should all be shot.

Posted by: Pathetic | October 19, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Grumpybumpy
The economy actually was better during the Clinton years and is not doing quite as well during the Bush administration. That said – you have to consider that neither president had very much to do with the state of the economy or much of anything else while they were in office.
Presidents don’t get to start over on much of anything – they simply get to play the hand that the last guy handed to him. Clinton’s brilliant handling of the economy was, in reality, mostly due to the accomplishments of Ronald Reagan that Bush 41 managed simply to not screw up. And by the way, Clinton’s great economic accomplishment was all an illusion – people tend not to remember that on the way out of office Clintons present to Bush 43 was a full blown recession. Does anyone remember the stock market crash of 2001? The market lost 37% of total value starting on 1/15/01 while Clinton was still in office for 5 more days and when Bush was inaugurated on 1/20/01 he was the one that had to clean up that mess. Of course he got blamed for it too.
Another thing you have to consider is how Clintons foreign policy impacted negatively on Bush’s economic situation. Every time terrorists attacked us under Clinton, he would throw a couple of Cruise missles at them and declare victory. The extremests concluded that we are weak, leading to 9/11 – resulting in 3000 dead and another economic disaster.

Posted by: Dave the Cabinetmaker | October 19, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Obama will set up a federal WELFARE program. If you want welfare vote for Obama. If you want your taxes to go to welfare vote for OBama.

Posted by: Duane Z | October 19, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Bobba
“Dave the Cabinetmaker, if your clients are so cheap that they cant stand to pay an extra few hundred dollars in taxes, on the $250,000+ they make then they are complete morons, and not patriotic.”
It’s not a few hundred dollars, it’s $7500, and that’s just on income tax. Not to mention a huge difference in Capital gains and dividend tax. They’re already paying $100,000 in income tax. Tack on an additional $10,000 in overall taxes and I can guarantee you I’ll be losing customers.

Posted by: Dave the Cabinetmaker | October 19, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Suppose that every
day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like
this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would ! pay $59 .
So, that’s what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the
cost of your daily beer by $20.”Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the
first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what
about the other six men; the paying customers? How could they divide the
$20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’ They realized
that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from
everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up
being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill
by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each
should pay.
And so :
The first four men (the poorest) would still pay nothing.
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to
drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare
their savings. “I only got a dollar out of the $20,”declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,” but he got $10!”
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar, too.
It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!”
“That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back when I
got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yell! ed the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the tenth
man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without
him.
But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important.
They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax
system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from
a tax reduction.
If you understand this, no explanation is needed. If you do not, no explanation is possible. (And by no means am I wealthy, but I do work and pay taxes).

Posted by: Rebfan | October 19, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

It is funny to see so many comments that have no credibility behind it. The republicans on here just repeat what they hear at the McCain rallies instead of doing their own research. The Republicans have started socialism by wanting to put billions back in the bank and receive stocks in the companies in return. Obama’s “spread the wealth” is spread the wealth of a tax break. Let the other 95% of America know what it feels like to receive some relief. It isn’t take the money from workers and give it to non workers.
McCain talks about Obama raising taxes but people don’t realize that he is talking directly to the large number of wealthy republicans that make over 250k. That isn’t the working class. The working class will get a cut. In the city I am from, small business owners aren’t living the life McCain thinks they are. If you want to know how much you get back from Obama go to his site and use the calculator he has provided. Research is THAT easy.
I think 100,000 people turning out in St. Louis and 75,000 people in Kansas City says a lot for Obama, especially in a republican state.

Posted by: Drew | October 19, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

A lot of Americans are hard workers and over the last several years seen the standard of life go down. I also read a lot about socialism. All Dems want is the Goverment to work for ordinary Americans as hard as they work for rich Americans. Isnt that the way America should be? Ask any American worker if he or she thinks all should have heath care and a quality education and i think you know the answer. McCain and Palin continue to bring devision to the American people. The robocalls keep hyping on Ayers and trying to convince people that Obama palls around with terrorist. Millions of America will thing we have a terrorist in Office if Obama wins and millions will be angry at McCain for the lies and devision if he wins. Not good. McCain says to the lady that called Obama an Arab that Obama is a good and respected family man and yet the next thing you know McCains calls Obama a pal of a terrorist. What McCain should of said was he isnt an Arab, but so what if he was. He isnt a Muslim but so what if he is. By not saying these things he brings devision and Im sorry my friends, but my idea of America is a country where all religions and races are welcome with open hearts and minds and treated with equal respect. Many a Rep likes to use Jesus or being Christian as its base. Let me ask you. If you believe in the Christian belief and in Jesus’s teachings you would also understand that he didnt like the Rich and wealthy and too, tought that all mankind was God’s children and believed in taking care of the less fortunate and hungry. He also tought forgiveness.
So some that are claming a Christian base and yet are using devision, racism or slander are going right against what they say they believe in. Jesus would have probably been a liberal due to his beliefs and teachings. To knock any man strickly due to race or wealth or religion is about the most unamerican thing one can do. It takes away any since of patriotism or love for this country or its ideas or what this country was founded on. The republican party needs a self test and to reflect on what it really stands for. Obama has my vote and i am proud to see Powell come on board.

Posted by: CW | October 19, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Obama said he was going to offer transparancy in govenment and then buried Welfare in the tax code. Is this an example of Obama being transparent?
Obama and Biden are attempting to use class warfare with his new welfare program. Obama introduces the largest welfare program in US history and calls it taxes. You have a bunch of tax takers running around talking about paying taxes, give me a break.
No for Socilism – No Obama
Tell Bad Botox Biden there are 4 letters in JOBS.

Posted by: ubu1991 | October 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Oooooo! We gonna make you white folks pay for wat you done to us black folks!
Once he win, Barack gonna take off his “happy face” mask, and Michelle gonna stomp through the Wite House like Black Godzilla!
You rich honkeys better get ready to pay for yo evil, white-devil ways, cause I ain’t never gonna get a job! You and yo lily-white kids gonna pay my bills fo-evah!
God d@mn America! God d@mn America! God d@mn America!

Posted by: whiteygonapay | October 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

what is astounding to me about republicans is that they have no recollection of history. When the great depression hit our nation, Roosevelt did not say, lets give the rich a tax break, he said how are we going to get workers back on their feet. He provided the middle class jobs, and a support system with medicare and social security and many other programs to support the working class. That is how we got out of the worst financial crisis. Support systems are not bad for the US nor are they socialist. I am not a socialist but I believe that government has the power to enrich the economy by providing affordable education, affordable healthcare, public safety in monitoring food supply, air traffic, inspection of infrastructure, and these are systems to make us safer just like the FTC which monitors the market to ensure investors. HELLO!!! Now because Bush ran up trillions in deficits, SOMEBODY HAS TO PAY FOR OUR NATIONAL DEBT!!!! You want to give tax breaks to exon, chevron, shell, halliburton, Bechtel who have made record profits during the Bush Administration. Obama is not planning on overtaxing the great businesses in this country, its that they need to pay a small percentage more to help finance tax cuts to the middle class to provide relief to people like us. 75% of this economy is dependent on consumer spending. IF we are losing jobs at an alarming rate, inflation (because of increase in MOney supply)food, energy, healthcare costs, how are we going to take an additional burden. Our real wages have dropped in the last decade despite the fact that other costs have gone up. We have just been spending our credit cards and equity lines in order to pretend we have spending money. Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and many other manufactoring states have lost all their good jobs to the chinese because Repubs believe that making products cheaper is the way to go and now look how high their unemployment rates are. SOme blue dog dems, clintons are partially to blame for this free trade bullcrap. Repubs i want to repeat again, if the wealthy in this country do not pay more for taxes, we will go bankrupt. We are currently paying 300 billion in interest to china, How much longer can we sustain this type of policy. Let us not forget the bogus bush war in iraq is costing 12 billion a month. In spite of all this debt, why does mccain want to give tax breaks to the wealthy. Bush has given the largest tax breaks to the wealthy in the last 8 years, WHERE ARE THE JOBS BASED ON YOUR TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS!!!!! SOMEBODY HAS TO PAY FOR THE DEBT, DO YOU WANT THE MIDDLE CLASS TO COLLAPSE? THAT IS YOUR SOLUTION!!! STUPID PEOPLE!!!

Posted by: patricia | October 19, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

You white devils are finally gonna pay for slavery! November 4, 2008 will be a GREAT day in history, marking the downfall of the most evil nation on earth!
God d@mn America!

Posted by: whiteygonapay | October 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

CAMPAIGN ALERT!!!!!
UNITE FOR CHANGE WE NEED AND CAN TRUST!
CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE
OBAMA/BIDEN ’08

Posted by: EYESURGERY | October 19, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

I curious, did Joe the plumber who is not really a licensed plumber who has only a slim chance of buying the quarter million dollar buisness that he hyped up. Maybe the publicity was in his plan to buy the buisness. But anyhoo here is a troubling thought.
Did Joe the plumber comit a tax deception by oweing twelve hundred dollars in back taxes? Did Joe the plumber recieve Bush’s Tax Stimulus check while he owed back taxes. If so what’s going on on the State level that their system didn’t pick it up. My point why would he owe $1200 when Bush was going to give him that much if he has a family or $600 if single? Wouldn’t he go for the wash and cover his tax liability? I’m sure more facts will come out about his tax problems through the medias investigative teams.

Posted by: Ebinezer | October 19, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I curious, did Joe the plumber who is not really a licensed plumber who has only a slim chance of buying the quarter million dollar buisness that he hyped up. Maybe the publicity was in his plan to buy the buisness. But anyhoo here is a troubling thought.
Did Joe the plumber comit a tax deception by oweing twelve hundred dollars in back taxes? Did Joe the plumber recieve Bush’s Tax Stimulus check while he owed back taxes. If so what’s going on on the State level that their system didn’t pick it up. My point why would he owe $1200 when Bush was going to give him that much if he has a family or $600 if single? Wouldn’t he go for the wash and cover his tax liability? I’m sure more facts will come out about his tax problems through the medias investigative teams.

Posted by: Ebinezer | October 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

What is astounding to me about democrats is that they have no recollection of history. In the 1930′s when Germany was suffering from economic collapse, the youth of that country rallied around a charasmatic politician who promised change…ADOLPH HITLER…you know the rest of the story.
With super-majorities in both houses of congress a definite possibility, Obama would essentially have the control of a dictator because their wouldn’t be enough opposing votes to stop him. His SOCIALIST policies would regulate many aspects of our lives, and we would lose many liberties that we have normally taken for granted. I advocate a more oderate type of change: MCCAIN/PALIN ’08!

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

You fear mongerers the last post about Germany and whites gonna pay are whats srong with this country and the reason we are in trouble. People like you undermine the voters by using scare tactics that have nothing to do with this election. I could just as easily poiny out something more likely to happen which would be Mc Cain winning and continueing our economic turmoil creating more welfare people, creating a bigger Deppression. Countries like Russia become emboldened and start attacking former Soviet Union countries to try and regain power and we go to war we Russia a weaker America and lose. This is more likely to happen under Mc Cain. More debts. More loss of life in wars. More of the same in the past 8 years. That my hate mongeres is reality not a fantasy world where you muslim conspiray theorist and terrorist cell in the white house lunies live in your world but actual factual things that could happen. Mc Cain continueing Bush’s legacies coupled with his temper could actually destroy your nation and you are worried about muslims and nazis when the ECONOMY is tanking. Stop worrying about race and get your mind on the country or check yourself into an institution because you sound crazy talking about socialism.

Posted by: Chris | October 19, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Chris, you poor mis-guided soul. You just don’t get it. Like a typical liberal, you totally twisted my words to suit your stance. I said nothing about race, but you had to play the race card. People like you undermine the voters by using scare tactics that have nothing to do with this election.
I’ve got nothing against a man’s race, but I do definitely disagree with Obama’s plans & policies. You fail to realize the cause/effect relationship of his Socialistic agenda. Increasing taxes on investors & businesses will stifle economic growth by increasing unemployment & increasing inflation. I am not “hate-mongering” as you say. My fear of Obama is real. I don’t want to lose my individual liberties to a leader who will over-regulate society. I don’t want my country to fall into Communism by way of Socialism.
By the way, it appears that you don’t even live in the USA by your mention of “your nation”, so keep your foreign opinions in your own country instead of spreading your loser ideas over here.

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

America, Obama has one thing right, we don’t need another 8 years of an inexperienced Commander in Chief.
Sen. Obama, experience matters. I have made many mistakes in my short life. It is true, when I think about it, that each of those mistakes are among my greatest assets with respect to decision making, each and every one of them. This is because we all learn from our mistakes. At all times, I believe the best of my judgment is anchored in the cement that is my experience. I believe firmly that the longer I live, the more I will have experienced, and the better my judgment will be, on the balance. Sen. Obama, do you really believe that you have made enough mistakes to be the next President of the United States? I respect your ambition. I respect your charisma. I embrace your place in history, but I do not believe you have sufficient experience to lead this planet, not even close.
America, since the mainstream media has failed to examine Sen. Obama’s experience and lack of experience, you will have to determine for yourselves what exactly is Sen. Obama’s experience? What did he accomplish in the Illinois legislature? He was only there for a handful of years. What did he promise he would accomplish? What did he accomplish in the U.S. Senate? He has only been on the job as a U.S. Senator for 1xx days. What did he promise he would accomplish? What has he changed in this world? This country? The Presidency of the United States is an executive position Sen. Obama. Do you have any executive experience? Have you created a budget, negotiated a budget, revised a budget or managed adherence to a budget?
Sen. Obama insists on presenting Sen. McCain’s experience as being only an puppet of the Bush administration. I saw Senator McCain stand up to President Bush’s Defense Secretary. He stood in a manner that no other did. He changed the course of the war in Iraq. What percentage of all GOP legislative votes sided with President Bush’s? What percentage of all Democrat legislative votes sided with Presidents Clinton, Carter and Johnson’s policies? I have no idea, but I’d venture to guess that, had the media presented that information to the American public, we’d find rank and file partisanship throughout our recent history. How many Americans would be surprise by that?
Well Senator Obama, you might be able to claim that you did not support the Iraq war resolution, but what can you offer as proof that it was the right decision at that moment in our history? You were after all in the small minority. Our country was after all reeling from the worst terror attack in our nation’s history. How would history have judged President Bush had he not led our troops into Iraq and then, a massive terror attack occurred yesterday, perpetrated by terrorists that lived and trained in Iraq over the past few years, with or without knowledge of Saddam Hussein? I think about it this way: history failed to present enough evidence to push the World to coalesce and intervene in 1930s Europe. But modern history is 100% clear on that point, it would have been the correct decision. History might well judge the Iraq war to be not a right decision. History will judge the Bush administration on many points. One of those may even record it, in part, as a series of lapses in the judgment of a young President, swayed by the belief and conviction of an older, seasoned Vice President and the overwhelming circumstances of a world that had changed dramatically, in an instant. I agree with you Sen. Obama that we don’t need another eight years of the Bush Administration, we dont need another eight years of an inexperienced President.
Mr. Gibson, Ms. Couric, Ms. Behar, Ms. Mitchell … you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You and your colleagues might think you have the power to micro-filter democracy’s messages to your liking, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You might think you have the power to subtly, and not so subtly promote and gather others to blindly promote one candidacy, while casting another in the least flattering manner possible, but you do not get to dismantle the American vote. You do not get to dismantle America’s vote. The mainstream media bias in this election is at best described as repugnant and at worst, a slap to the face of democracy; an assault on the moral and righteous ideal that all American voters should be free to construct their vote on the basis of readily available, factually complete, accurate, relevant and unbiased fact. It is my opinion that, during this election cycle more than any other I have witnessed, the mainstream media has failed millions of American’s who rely on them, as a basis for constructing their vote. Am I wrong? I might be wrong, but I’ll ask you, the American voters to decide that for yourself, by asking yourself some questions. Questions such as why was so much time spent this election cycle mining for dirt in Alaska, why was so little time was spent tracking laundry in Illinois? Why has the mainstream media spent so little time illuminating the razor thin experience that the junior Senator from Illinois maintains as his credentials? Indeed, if the media was prepared to be fair and honest, they would have been able to report, with incontrovertible confidence, that they were reporting fact, that the candidate having the most experience directly relevant to the position of the Presidency of the United States is actually the candidate that has been relentlessly attacked by the media, both personally and professionally. The mainstream media owes an apology to American Democracy for its treatment of Gov. Palin. Why is it, that after finally deciding to give minimal airtime to the ACORN voter registration fraud issue, was it not mentioned that Sen. Obama’s campaign funded ACORN? Sen. Obama, in my mind, there is no distinction between committing voter registration fraud, serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud or funding those serving as impetus to commit voter registration fraud. During the last debate, you did a fine job of distancing yourself from ACORN, but you failed to directly confront and condemn those that perpetrate or encourage voter registration fraud. You had a nationwide audience, and you chose not to act.
The President is the commander in chief of the United States Armed Forces. That is a serious responsibility. I question how you can expect us to believe that you will effectively maintain the moral, skill and competence of our forces after you have insulted them. What will serve as your experiential basis for leading the U.S. Military? Do you have any military experience at all? Have you ever served in ROTC? Do you know firsthand the horrors of war? I believe that firsthand knowledge and experience is the most critical element one can use in formulating decisions, including the determination of when to and when not to deploy U.S. Military forces. Sen. McCain has that experience. That I know. That he has shown. The media can’t take that away from him.
With regard to foreign policy experience, do you think you are qualified to navigate the most powerful democracy the world knows during a time when the fundamentals of democracy are very much under attack? Are you ready to face Mr. Putin? Mr. Chavez? Kim Jung Ill? China? Iran? Are you ready to answer the 03:00 phone call? What experience do you have that I should judge gives you readiness? What is that experience? What foreign leaders have you negotiated with directly? What treaties have you signed? The media has presented none and neither have you. I have a good number of stamps in my passport Sen. Obama. I lived and worked in Germany for a brief period. Sen. Obama, I am not qualified by a longshot to make United States foreign policy, and you may only be marginally more qualified than I.
The oratorical is no substitute for judgment or experience Senator Obama. I do not believe that you have the experience to be President of our country. Experience matters Sen. Obama, and you are not ready, you have not made enough mistakes. But most glaring to me, Senator Obama is the one mistake that you seem willing to make over and over and it is the worst mistake one can make. That mistake is the action of not owning one’s mistakes.
Sen. Obama, you claim that you will cut taxes on 95% of all Americans. Is that true? Or let me rephrase, how can that be true? You told the voters of Illinois that you would cut taxes, but you have failed to do so in the U.S. Senate. Did you even try? Did you present a bill? Were it a committee issue did you encourage your peers to present one? Have you ever voted for a tax cut? What did you mean Senator Obama when you told Plumber Joe that you wanted to spread the wealth? Do you mean that you want to take money from Joe and give it to those with less money? Your running mate, Sen. Biden has commented that you would not be taxing additionaly those making under $250,000 a year. Sen. Biden commented that he knows no plumbers that make over $250,000 a year. I think that those who claim your tax policies embody class warfare are wrong. Wrong, because the policies are class warfare policies, but they are not directed against the haves, they are directed against the have-nots. Senator Biden, you may well be correct that few plumbers earn over $250,000 a year, but some that own plumbing contracting businesses probably do. What do those that spin your message have planned to say to that one plumber out of maybe six or seven that was employed by a plumbing company, but was laid off, because business is slow, new homes weren’t being built and President Obama’s tax increase forced the owner of the plumbing business to lay her off? The owner tried every angle possible, but was forced to make a tough decision. They were faced with the prospect of either making a tough decision or risk running the entire operation into financial distress and end up having to close operations and fire all workers? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell her that, even though she has no job, she does at least still have affordable healthcare? Senator Obama what will you say to the unemployed plumber in Ohio, father of two, that nearly had a job secured, the owner had just signed a good contract for a small building and he was ready to hire that plumber, but learned from his accountant, that Senator Obama’s tax increase has made it not possible to hire another employee? I guess you’d have Mr. Burton tell that plumber, that even though he still has no job, he does have a lower tax burden
Sen. Obama, you have stated over and over that Sen. McCain supports tax breaks for corporations that send their jobs overseas. The media has not reported on this one way or another, but if you are correct, then I commend Sen. McCain for doing so. What you don’t get, Sen. Obama, or perhaps don’t want the American public to get, is that income taxes, to a for profit enterprise are expenses not much different from the costs of raw materials and salary expenses for purposes of this discussion. All else equal, ladies and gentleman, a corporation will locate itself, and its jobs, or begin to locate itself and its jobs, in areas where it is least penalized in terms of taxes. This is how for profit American corporations behave and this is how they must behave. Their competitors are operating in that manner, continually scouring expenses to search for reduction opportunities. They have to. If they do not, they will be at a cost disadvantage and if their tactical errors are sustained, they may well go out of business in which case, even those jobs which remain in the United States, could also disappear. Even if the company does not fail entirely, some jobs may be eliminated, and chances are great that the highest cost jobs would be targeted first. Sen. Obama, America is not a low cost country, in these circumstances, they would be targeted first, all else equal. When those jobs are cut Sen. Obama, those new unemployed will not have money to support the ‘under $250k’ crowd…they won’t have money to support small businesses…is it sinking in at all?
Your position of not supporting tax breaks for corporations that export jobs overseas, indeed, only encourages them, at the margin, to further export jobs, or slow their job creation in the United States or end their job creation in the United States. This is global economic reality. The media can not distort this fact for you. At the final debate, I heard you add a carrot to your plans. You pulled that same tax string attached to the back of your head and out came the message you think the voters want to hear. If I got it correct, you’ll give tax credits to corporations that create jobs in America. In case you don’t know Senator Obama, this already happens today at the state and local level all across America. Have you thought about how much additionaly, it will cost the U.S. Treasury to employ workers, in an audit fashion, in order to verify which of all the xx million jobs that corporations claim they created actually exist? What are the time constraints? How long must they keep the job filled in order to receive the credit? What would happen when that time passes? Let me get this correct, you want to first keep tax rates on corporations high or raise them – thereby encouraging employers large and small to export their operations and jobs – and then at the same time you want to turnaround and give them a tax credit? You do realize that they are policy opposites don’t you? It looks to me that you might be trying to convince us that it would be a good idea to spend more on government for an unknown expected net job increase. If you can convince us of that Senator Obama, I’d suggest you also try to sell us a bridge to nowhere. Your tax policy is bigger government, bigger IRS, more regulatory burden on American Corporations and more administrative overhead makes them less competitive in the global market and less likely to employ. It is not the right policy Senator Obama.
Go back to the Senate and accomplish something Sen. Obama. Your candidacy is an insult to America.
oh and ps, the verdict has been in for decades on the effectiveness of spreading the wealth policies. Go visit an American Indian Reservation Sen. Obama. The only thing that has changed for the past several decades is the faces of the Washington politicians that have redistributed wealth to us. Do you have any clue what the average unemployment rate is in Indian Country Sen.Obama? Illicit drug use rate? Teen pregnancy rate? Pick a rate
Senator.

Posted by: Obama is 8 more years of Bush | October 19, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

MORE McCAIN HYPOCRISY and the DEMOCRATS DON’T RESPOND WITH ENOUGH FORCE TO CHALLENGE GOP HYPOCRISY.
Republicans have been providing tax-breaks and tax cuts for the rich individuals and corporations since Ronald Reagan’s “Trickle down” economics. The benefits were supposed to reach the middle class and it never did; at least not the impact we had hoped. But Republicans never called this SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH!
Now Senator Obama & Biden advocates tax-cuts for the middle-class and for those making less than $250,000.00; while McSame calls this SOCIALISM! This is McSame HYPOCRISY to the highest levels.
GOD Bless the United States of America!
GOD Bless the Leadership of Obama-Biden Team!

Posted by: Perusing-Through | October 19, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Even if Obama was being straightforward about how he’s getting tax money out of people, his plan would only help plumbers until they wanted to take the next step in their lives. Also, if you are a small business, beware of the dreaded $250,000 threshold. To cap a person’s success threshold is without a doubt socialism, and it is a GIANT leap towards communism.

Posted by: Mike | October 19, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Obama = Hope and Progress for our great nation in the future.
McCain = More of the same and a worsened nation and world.
100,000 people speaks for itself.

Posted by: beafraidofangryoldmen | October 19, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Natasha and others -
If you’re going to invoke Marx’s name please at least know how to spell it. It’s Karl Marx, not Carl Marx.

Posted by: Jesse | October 19, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

McCain = moderate change
Obama = radical change (Socialism)

Posted by: 42n82bfearless | October 19, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I just donated $50 bucks to help Obama speak against all of the lies. It felt GOOD! I plan on doing it again the next time I get paid -

Posted by: Nat Turner | October 19, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

If a tax cut for 95% is socialism. What is a tax cut to Exxon Mobil? Energy Conservation -
You people are idiots and you deserve a recession, a depression, and the right to see your 401k bottom out!
I can see you pulling the lever for McCain right now with your lack of basic rationalization skills.
OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Posted by: Nat Turner | October 19, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Bottom line is that socialism turns prosperous nations into cesspools. There are very few people who would work if you offered them free housing, free food, and free healthcare instead. All of the present problems with the US economy were caused by too much socialism, not too little (e.g., the Democrat caused mortgage fiasco). Also, when a Republican president takes office, that doesn’t instantly wipe out all of the socialist programs from the past. They still remain on the books. To get rid of those programs, Congress must pass legislation (and the President must sign it) in the same manner it took to originally pass the law. This is why we can rarely get rid of socialist programs once they are enacted. The US is now at a crossroads. We can turn back to the economic principles that have made us the most prosperous nation in history, or we can go down the dark road to socialist squalor. If you want the latter, vote Obama.

Posted by: Wisdom | October 19, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

If anyone thinks that Obama can give the people of the US a socialist healthcare system and only increase the tax on top 5% earners, than I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Do the math children?

Posted by: NoWayLeftay | October 19, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

The McCain/Palin campaign has gone further and further into a frighteneing segment of America’s past. Racism. And taking their “base” with them. The hatred fomenting at their rallies is getting more intense. There is no doubt in this white women’s heart that the comments and name calling are sad, desaparate attempts to divide America the Beautiful. Please don’t let this happen.

Posted by: OSusana | October 19, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

The Bush / McCain “trickle down” approach has resulted only in rich getting richer (hoarding their gains) and what “trickles” down is much like the old Yiddish saying that translates to, “Don’t pee on my back and tell me it’s raining.” Obama’s spread the wealth plan intends to give the middle a chance to catch up. Will it mean the rich like Cindy & John McCain can’t buy ther 13th house with cash…maybe. Where is the greater good? Vote for the Middle, Vote for Obama.
Posted by: Rick_VT | Oct 19, 2008 9:46:23 AM
—————————————-
Republican supporters want voters to ignore the fact that republicans policies have failed miserably over the past 8 years. Yet they continue to try and convince us that Obama is riskier. They need to just STGU since they have F….d up and let capable responsible people handle the nations business.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

You white devils are finally gonna pay for slavery! November 4, 2008 will be a GREAT day in history, marking the downfall of the most evil nation on earth!
God d@mn America!
Posted by: whiteygonapay | Oct 19, 2008 1:48:29 PM
—————————————-
Just because you take your hood and sheet off in the dark doesn’t make you Black mister kkk. Now go back to chewing tobacco and dipping snuff.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

BO “Spread the Wealth Around” just what the Democrats love…. More Class warfare…. the FACT is small business will be TAXED @ a higher rate under BO….. he and the media are just plan LIEING……… PLUS when you raise taxes on Businesses… GUESS WHAT … they raise their prices….. so who actually pays “THE CONSUMER….. YOU PAY”….. so this is just a HIDDEN tax on the consumer…
Posted by: Vet1973 | Oct 18, 2008 3:58:26 PM
—————————————-
Vet1973
The Iraq war is a hidden tax are you also claiming to be a veteran?
So why aren’t you railing against Bush/McCain who lied us into the IRAQ war which is costing billions and thousands of our brave troop’s lives?

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 19, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

I drop outa skule cuz it no fun so I aint unerstandin dis polatiks stuf but wen i here dat obama say he wanna spred dat wealth arownd dats wen i new he wuz getin my vote. gimme sum a dat rich whiteys mony cuz it aint no fare he rich an i aint

Posted by: Spread Dat Whiteys Welth Arownd | October 19, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Is Obama socialist with his word “spread the wealth”, I found this article from Canada Free Press.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5655

Posted by: Lisalynna | October 20, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Is Obama socialist with his word “spread the wealth”, I found this article from Canada Free Press.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5655
Posted by: Lisalynna | Oct 20, 2008 12:57:33 AM
—————————————-
The republican party is a plutocracy. I’ll take Obama over that everytime.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 20, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Ahh yes–the fallacy of those malicious corporations cause all of our problems!! A chance for “the little guy” to teach them a lesson!! Unfortunately it will be us “the little guy” that learns a hard lesson here. This isn’t make believe -Obama is not Robin Hood taking from the rich and giving to the poor. I have seen the polls, but I doubt that people really want to give their hard earned money to those that don’t work. We already have alot of social programs to help those that need it.We need to focus on building businesses not taxing them more so they ALL leave the country. There are plenty of other countries just waiting to take more of our industry. I don’t believe most AMericans want to turn the US into a welfare state.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 20, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Obama is the king of double speak with a forked tounge.
If a person who does NOT pay taxes gets federal money from his “tax cuts”….it IS socialism!!
You are free to become rich if you want. You are free to be a deadbeat. You do not have the right for the government to make a deadbeat rich.

Posted by: Snake Obama | October 20, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Joe the Plumber knows a turd when he sees one…so do I. A Big arrogant, swaggering skinny Turd with big ears and a much bigger ego endorsed by turncoat, wimpy “Colon” Powell. Gee, what a shocker that one turd would endorse another. Flush this turd Obama and his crappy wife back to Chicago on Nov 4th.

Posted by: PlumbersUnionForMcCain | October 20, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Obama calls tax cuts welfare? That’s the exact reason why democrats should never win elections. To a democrat your income really belongs to the government and the portion they allow you to keep is a gift from them. Welfare. I have news for Obama, tax cuts for people or companies is just government TAKING LESS of income EARNED by businesses and people. They’re not giving anyone anything.

Posted by: VoterInOhio | October 20, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

JOE THE PLUMBER IS THE BEST THING FOR THE OBAMA CAMP…OBAMA COULD SHOW HOW ANY PLUMBER MAKING 250 k WILL DO MUCH BETTER UNDER HIS PLAN.
McCain states Obamas plan is socialism. This could backfire on him big time. He would have to claim that paying taxes is socialism which means he would have to eliminate ALL TAXES not to be creating socialism. McCains plan actually offers more socialism that Obamas except it goes up the ladder to the WEATHIEST not down the ladder to the middle class like Obamas.
Obamas tax plan will help 95% OF THE AMERICANS PAYING TAXES. MCCAINS PLAN WILL MAKE THE CURRENT TAX PLAN WORSE FOR EVERYONE.
McCain/Palin tax and economic plans are much worse for Joe the Plumber and the majority of American. McCain is the true socialist here.
TIME TO TURN IT AROUND AND SHOW THE FACTS FOLKS!

Posted by: virginiablow | October 20, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

To everyone following this: “taxpolicycenter.org” is an independant website for tax policy that EVEN FOX NEWS uses for unbiased information on the candidates tax policies and they state that what Mccain is saying about Obama’s tax policies is FALSE.. If you want accurate and unbiased info that is the place to go. Also, “The National Federation of Independent Business”, “The Small Buisness Administration of America” as well as conservative leaning newspapers such as “Bloomberg Times”, “Wall Street Journal” and others are reporting that 95% of small buisnesses AND individuals make less than $250,000 per year and WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY Obama’s tax plan. So if you want to support Mccain, “no matter what”, thats fine, but don’t perpetuate falsehoods about his tax plan. Its dishonest, it weakens our democracy and THAT is un-american.

Posted by: recoveringrepublican | October 20, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

All of you retarded republicans need to examine where we are and where we need to go. If paying a little more in taxes doesn’t affect your lifestyle, and helps the majority of the middle class, what’s the problem? I guess they (the middle class) should shoulder the weight and like it right? Forget You!!! Change is coming one way or another.

Posted by: JP | October 20, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I’m really doubting that Obama’s tax plan will really help America’s middle and lower class.
http://www.nevadapundit.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/what-obamas-tax-plan-means-to-the-middle-and-lower-class/

Posted by: NevadaPundit | October 20, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

” Obamas tax plan is a reward to slackers”…….puting the guy 5th from the bottom of the class in the naval academy in flight school sounds like the ultimate reward to a slacker…….no wonder he crashed 5 times……….Obama would have been mopping the deck of the tanker after the first crash

Posted by: Country folk | October 20, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Keep looking through the keyhole at the world and elect John McCane. Then you next step should be to go and learn Chinese.

Posted by: Whocareswhat freddiesays | October 20, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Funny, I have been a Democrat for over 2 decades, owned 4 companies after spending 10 years as a Navy aviator. When my last company’s main client relocated to Mexico City in 1999, I laid off my 16 employees, sold my Microsoft stock, paid my pre-Bush “borrow and spend” taxes, pocket the remaining $2.8Mil, and retired at age 45.
In my experience, people who REALLY are making over $250,000 are not angry, hateful, pathetic losers who twist the facts, outright lie, and hate anyone who has a positive outlook.
Just remember Neocons – DELTA IS READY WHEN YOU ARE and Mexico is just what you are looking for – head on out….
Obama will make a great President.

Posted by: Retired@45PhD | October 20, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

To the person who equated retiring at age 62 & then collecting Social Security with being a welfare bum — are you out of your mind? How dare you act like people who worked hard and paid into the Social Security their entire working life are somehow “on the dole” when they collect their SS — you only get an SS amount proportional to how much you worked, there is no “free” money being handed out. I knew Republicans equated public assistance (welfare) with socialism but now you are a socialist if you choose to retire after you are 60 and collect your Social Security benefits??

Posted by: I VEY | October 27, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Come on people wake up. The economy is in the toilet lets blame the republicans. BS Check the farm bill and who voted for it. Check how the bailout bill was actually done. Hmm both with a democrat controlled senate. Get educated before spewing bs. “Bush lowered the tax brackets” no he just approved the law sent to him from congress and the senate. Duh. Yeah Obama wants to help the “middle class” He keeps touting the “working families”. Why doesn’t he define working family? Quick taking the info provided by the parties and the media. Do some damned research or is that going to impact your time watching television. We are getting to the point of a nation of morons. And the morons are still blindly follow the BS their told. Kinda like when Clinton said he would only raise taxes on people making roughly 70k+. We know how that turned out. Check the facts. Spend spend spend requires funding somehow. Where are these glorious programs from both sides going to get the money? Lets see. If McCain wins and the congress and Senate are democrat, does anyone here seriously believe he will get the tax cuts he proposes? The president can do executive orders, yes. The senate and congress can override those with legislation. The congress and the senate can force through any legislation it wants. Check out the farm bill mentioned earlier and realize it was a democrat control senate and a balanced house. Hello is there anyone with a brain out there to do research? Research the bailout bill and why the senate or congress would not release the details until it was signed into law. Majority democrats. It is the same bill as the house had that caused the firestorm of emails and phone calls. They didn’t want to deal with that so they didn’t publicize it. It was the same 110 from congress and roughly 330 0f pork for an extra 100 billion. Talk about BS. Get educated. Get off the damn TV for an hour or so. Make an educated choice either way.

Posted by: Disliker of Ostriches | October 27, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Apparently Obama thinks we are all stupid – Obama supporters are pretty dumb. When the government gives you a tax refund, when no tax was due what esle is but welfare. It is called a credit, a credit for what? What was done to earn a credit?

Posted by: Terry | November 1, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

“Obama’s tax credits go to people who pay payroll taxes, even if they are too low-income to pay federal income taxes. The Obama campaign says most working people pay more in payroll taxes than income tax.”
For the uneducated (Obama supporters), payroll taxes consist of Social Security and Medicare, both of which will benefit them when they retire. In fact most people receive many times more in Social Security benefits than they ever pay.

Posted by: Terry | November 1, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Ooooooh i want to try them as well! Love Urban Decay!

Posted by: Isreal Ruther | September 26, 2011, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.