Obama’s New Attack on Those Who Don’t Want Higher Taxes: ‘Selfishness’
On the stump this week, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has pushed back against Sen. John McCain’s description of his tax policies.
"The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code, is not because I have anything against the rich," Obama said in Sarasota, Fla., yesterday. "I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the American dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific.
"The point is, though, that — and it’s not just charity, it’s not just that I want to help the middle class and working people who are trying to get in the middle class — it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore. And that’s what I’m gonna do as president of the United States of America.
"John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic," Obama continued. "You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness."
It’s unclear if this was a nod to the Ayn Rand book "The Virtue of Selfishness," with all that the invocation of Rand implies.
It would seem to be, given the themes of Rand’s work, what happens when independent achievers are demonized.
Which would fit with this description of those who want to keep their hard-earned tax dollars as "selfish."
Atlas may not be shrugging, but Obama is.
– jpt
Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
A lot of rich people would leave me struggling to deem their dollars “hard earned”.
Posted by: jozsef | October 31, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Question for you Jake: Just how great does the disparity of wealth have to get before the USA stops being a democracy?
What, won’t be satisfied until you see bread lines? Don’t worry about the wealthy. That’s what the Wall Street bailout was all about, no? Welfare for corporations and their wealthy shareholders and management has been and will always be alive and well.
Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Since the left bloggers have been waging war on objectivism and Rand in particular, it makes sense that this would surface in Obama’s speech. What it reveals is that despite his attempts to portray himself as a centrist, he is what he appears to be: a hard core radical leftist with a socialist philosophy of government and finance.
Obama says he can enrich the individual at the expense of other individuals but that is the oldest con after ‘try it, you’ll like it’. It only enriches the con man. When done to an eager mark, it is an act of confidence over arrogance. When done to a country simply wanting to be rid of confidence men, it is fraud against justice.
“The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.” Ayn Rand
Posted by: len | October 31, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
McCain/Palin have kept pushing their argument that Obama’s economic policies are far left. Well, the “Economist”, the well-respected, conservative economic weekly, endorsed Obama yesterday.
Who’s the real centrist, folks?
Posted by: teddymaniac | October 31, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Jake – you’re late. Obama made this comment yesterday morning.
The point is – “share the wealth” or the Government will force you to share it! That’ll fix all the selfish “rugged individuals” that this country has way too many of in the first place.
Obama will use the Government to correct the immoral selfishness and make us virtuous, righteous and generous. This is the Change We Need.
Godspeed to you, Sen. Obama!
This is one leftist who is proud to be against this selfish Repub establishment. Don’t be afraid when they call you Marxist or socialist – because there is nothing wrong with that! America finally sees the light and will get the redistribution that it needs and that you will bring!
Posted by: Voter2Be | October 31, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
I exist therefor I deserve what you have worked for?
Posted by: Ray | October 31, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
I actually agree with the objections to Obama’s tax plan, and find myself nodding in agreement with Rand’s discussion of demonization of ‘independent achievers.’ Rich people don’t owe the rest of us anything.
However, when the supposedly ‘free-market’ party asks us to bail out large banks who made stupid decisions, it’s kind of hard for the Republicans to claim to be the party of hard-working individualism. So, another 3d-party vote for me, I suppose.
Posted by: DC | October 31, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Is Obama being selfish, or something else, when he fails to extend a hand to his aunt, who has lived for years in a housing project in South Boston? Doesn’t she deserve a chance to, a helping hand, from the millionaires in her own family?
Posted by: Chaz | October 31, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Selfishness is a central tenet of Capitalism. We don’t like selfishness as citizens, but we support it as consumers every time we go into a store looking for the lowest price, regardless of means of production.
Posted by: helloworld | October 31, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
All these economic Randists seem to want it both ways. They claim to be concerned about the rights of individuals, but it doesn’t stop them from trying to stack the deck in their own favor. They don’t want regulations and taxes because it inhibits their ability to pillage. Well, when someone pollutes my air and my water, I want to be paid. When someone wants to get wealthy (e.g.Wal-Mart and shareholders) by paying their workers so little they can’t survive, they should be stopped.
We don’t live in a level field free market society and never have. It’s always been tilted towards the wealthy and always will be.
Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
and then there are millions of us selfless American who don’t care about Obama’s so-called tax cut.
This is pure Obama -Socialism and class warfare.
Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Teddy– the only person that reads “The Economist” is Sarah Palin.
Posted by: cardinal | October 31, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Join with me!
All of you middle class Republicans out there, join with me. When we receive our tax cut from Obama and his socialist plan, we should send the extra money to the largest shareholders at Exxon.
Let’s show them!
Perhaps you have a CEO making millions at your business. Give him your tax refund! Help spur the economy so it can trickle back down.
Please. I ask that you join with me to ensure we maintain the stable course promoted by John McCain.
Posted by: Pubs, We must Fight Back! | October 31, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Obama is the selfish one. Look at his pitiful charity donations. Almost nothing and then only to Wright.
Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Big mouth Liar. Where was his generosity? It is easy for him to say “it’s not just charity” for the common good of the society, but before he decided to run for the Pres. to show something, he contributed less than 0.5% to charities, and that charity was contributed to his hate-monger Rev. Wright.
Posted by: d0 | October 31, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Let’s see now…
Under Obama I can stay middle class and have all my needs taken care of…
Or I can work hard and become rich so that I can pay my own way plus be taxed enough to pay everyone elses.
Why would anybody choose working hard?
Posted by: marylou | October 31, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
“we should send the extra money to the largest shareholders at Exxon.’
you mean like Northern Trust??????
Where Obama has millions invested?
Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
@ Ray who asks “I exist therefore I deserve what you have worked for?”
Yes, precisely. You are your brothers’ keeper. We exist, so the MORAL and UNSELFISH thing for you to do is live on less and give us more. That way you have what you NEED, but we have what we NEED too.
Not everybody is lucky to have a job — some people can’t work or don’t work. It’s none of your business why, just that if they don’t, or don’t earn as much as you, then we need to “distribute” so there is equality.
That’s what America is about – it’s the REAL American dream!!
Posted by: Voter2Be | October 31, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I am a part of a vanishing group of Americans. Soon the middle-class Americans will be extinct.
—————-
And who do you think started this decline exactly?
The seperation between rich and the diminishing middle class has occured at an exponential rate under Republican supply side economic theory.
The wealthiest 5% have DOUBLED their holdings in just 8 years. Middle class wages and savings have both gone DOWN.
It baffles me that GOP supporters cannot see the connection. The Republican party of today is not the same party it was 25 years ago. They have done absolutely nothing forthe middle class. Nothing.
Posted by: Is it that hard to understand? | October 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Hit the nail on the head. Too many folks bitching about taxes are simply selfish and miserly and don’t want to pay a dime in taxes. I know personally since I have a brother like that. Considers any money given to the given to the government to be wasted money. For example, since he has no kids he can’t understand having his tax dollars spent on education. Wouldn’t matter if the tax rate was .05% he wouldn’t want to pay it. Funny thing is my mom worked in a factory line for over 30 years and my father was a short haul truck driver for over 40 years. They raised five kids but I never heard either bitch about taxes (which were much higher then) yet folks like my brother with far less responsibilities and tons more income bitch constantlt. And of course, he is a die-hard Republican.
Posted by: indy_voter | October 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
What’s money after all? When we die we can’t bring all our money to death. I just don’t understand those people who are rich though some rich people are generous enough to share their wealth.Remember folks, we all will die and we can’t bring our money in death.What’s important is you do good things to your fellowmen and that God will give you a reward which is heaven when you die.AMEN!
Posted by: michael | October 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Wow, Voter2Be… I hope that’s sarcasm. Please tell me it’s sarcasm.
Posted by: marylou | October 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Ok I come from Switzerland which is the least of the European Socialistic countries but it is still socialistic. Still Switzerland has the world’s best direct democracy and a free capitalistic economy. SO here is what you will get from the Swiss “socialism”: 1) a progressive tax scale (about 15% to 40% max) 2) a cap on CEO salaries, if the company makes a large profit it has to trickle down: you may get a 13 month or even a 14 month salary instead of only 12 month salary. 3) 4 weeks paid vacation on top of an other 3 weeks of holidays (also paid). 4)free schools and universities 5) public transportation that is faster then using your own car. 6) Unlike other European countries we must buy your own health insurance (mandatory), there is a basic health plan and you can upgrade it (other countries have public health care systems, we don’t) 7.) Trial layers and malpractice are nationally regulated and capped to keep costs low. 8) Strict rules on loans and mortgage: 1/3 down payment proof to afford 1/3 of monthly payment. 9) Social Security and Disable insurance will be deducted from monthly salary with the contribution of employer.
Still we have a free market, banking systems and have world leading companies such as Nestle, Novatris, ABB, Swatch …
I don’t know why you all think that socialism is so bad. It is not communism and will change democracy ! By the way the communism will never survive, look at Russia and now at China. Both have now more millionaires than the USA. By the way the USA had always a progressive taxation and Republicans and Democrats have used it in the past. The progression might be different. Ask yourself does this make one or the other a socialist or a Marxist?
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
A guy who wasted $600 million on styrofoam columns and infomercials lecturing us about selfishness?
Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
All of you BO worshippers be sure to give half of your kid’s Halloween candy to the kids who are too lazy to earn their own.
Posted by: sam | October 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Growing the middle class to lift all boats. Preferable to growing the wealthy and hoping some scraps will fall from the table.
Posted by: cincyr | October 31, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Hey Chaz, how do you know he didnt try to help poor auntie???? maybe she declined, just like J Hudsons mother did.Does he even know this auntie??? maybe not..please dont assume something u really dont know about.
if u become a millionare will u share your wealth with all your cousins and long lost family u dont know who may live in poverty? I think not
Posted by: deb | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Wow! Selfish and unpatriotic. What next?
Posted by: chris | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Meanwhile Obama is asking for just $5 more from his supporters.
He just can’t seem to get enough money.
And I’m sure they will do as their leader says.
Don’t be selfish!
Posted by: bailey | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Rand’s view of “selfishness” is in line with what Marianne Williamson meant in her poem “Authenticity”…the concept that when we pursue our own personal best, those around us are also raised up. Many on the left love Williamson’s views on life–she is not a religious author–but rather a spiritual author, loved by Oprah, etc.
Here is the text of her poem:
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate.
Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.
It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us.
We ask ourselves, “Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, and fabulous?”Actually, who are you not to be?
Your playing small doesn’t serve the world.
There’s nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you.
We were born to make manifest the glory that is within us.
It’s not just in some of us; it’s in everyone.
And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same.
As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.
~Marianne Williamson~
Selfishness–as Rand and Williamson define it is not as Obama define it–at all.
Posted by: Michelle | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
It is apparent that the Trickle Up theory works.
Ask a man who’s wife is worth 10o million dollars from the sale of beer, what is good for beer sales, and she will say during a recession beer sales increases.
Ask a man who’s wife is worth 100 million dollars, what is best for America and the middle class, and the answer will be the more she keeps the better for America.
Posted by: Thinking | October 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
OK so it is selfish to want to keep the money you have earned. What is it called when you want to keep what you have earned, but also want the government to take some away from others and give it to you?
Posted by: jpfred | October 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
If you have any doubt what phony, hypocrisy is, you simply just look at 0bama.
On one hand, he lectures his subsidiaries selfishness, charity, contribution to the common good of the society.
On the other hand, he panders his blind followers by bribery, cash giveaways, $1000 if you vote for him.
He promises to take care of you, giving you opportunities to get into the middle class; yet, he leaves his own brother in poverty at $1 per month in his homeland, his aunt on the streets of Boston.
Mr. Bush answers the call of a High Father and you know what he has done in the past 8 years.
Mr. 0bama answers the call of his High Father, and 0bama’s High Father is Karl Marx.
Posted by: d0 | October 31, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Some of us get it.
Redistribution, Economic Justice, Civil Rights.
Tax cuts, handouts, Welfare, Reparations.
Obama said he didn’t believe in reparations–he knew that wouldn’t win an election.
So he just called them tax cuts.
He’s making Karl Marx, Wright, and Ayers so very proud.
Posted by: riley | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
“We don’t live in a level field free market society and never have. It’s always been tilted towards the wealthy and always will be.”
The extreme objectivist position is that if a government gives to each according to needs and takes according to abilities, a society of incapable needy emerges. Experience shows that is too extreme. What happens is the needy move to the capable and unless the capable take more, they can’t give more. In Internet lists it is called the ‘free rider’ dilemma. The response is usually to close the lists to real contributors with participation agreements for intellectual property that do not harm the commons but do not enable the commons to be pillaged.
Objectivism isn’t wrong. Rand overromanticized her position but behaviorally, it is correct.
Selfishness isn’t virtuous but neither is theft by a powerful minority in the name of an undiscriminated majority. It is the supreme confidence game which victimizes the poor and the rich simultaneously for the good of a few who are grabbing for wealth and power. In short, it is piracy, a very democratic institution, which, by the way, is why America is a republic.
Posted by: len | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Obama can keep his $500 bribe.
There is no amount of money that would get me to vote for him.
Posted by: meggie | October 31, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Obama team to bring people down to earth, after a campaign in which his soaring rhetoric and promises of “hope” and “change” are now confronted with the reality of a stricken economy.
Obama telling the story of “sharing” his toys and peanut butter sandwich. He compares that to “share the wealth”. The difference is the government (or teacher) didn’t make him do it. It isn’t mandated. Plenty of rich folks share their wealth – voluntarily.
Obama and Biden don’t give even 1% of their income to charity. Why don’t they “share” that wealth???
Posted by: MaryD | October 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Obama and I have have different views about what the term “selfishness” is.
I’ve always believed that charity starts at home. You take carre of your family members that need help, then you extend your services to those in your community.
Obama has family members living in squalor on $1 month in 6 x 9 huts and the Boston Housing Authority has voiced their shock that Obama’s aunt Zeituni is living in the slums in Boston. She receives a meager salary and still managed to send him $260 to his already almost $1 billion war chest. He took the $$ and thanked her. He should be giving her money. He could send $20 a year to his poor relations in Kenya and it would triple their yearly income.
Now, his charity donations are low also, he gave to the literacy program, $5,000 to an African Dance studio and $30,000 to Trinity United. I thought donations given to the church went to community services, but apparently, Rev Wright decided he needed a $10 million line of credit and he needed a multi-million dollar home.
If Obama can’t even take care of his family, how does he intend to take care of mine?
He doesn’t, he’s running for president on empty promises he knows are impossible to fulfill just to build up his ego even more.
Posted by: S Adams | October 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Jake, you’re wearing me out. Obama makes a comment about selfishness, and you reach into another galaxy and pull out a toxic association that Obama himself does not make, and then you make the case for why you’re right.
Why can’t you just accept the idea that rich people hanging onto all their dollars while the country goes belly-up is selfish? Why don’t you associate Obama’s comments with Buffet, who’s basically stated that keeping all his money would be selfish? Or Bill Gates, who seems to have come to the same conclusion.
Stop trying to be smarter than the problem. Stop reading things into statements that aren’t in the statement.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Obama doesn’t share his wealth with his poor Auntie — He wants our tax money to support her.
Posted by: MaryK | October 31, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
I am voting for OBAMA and proud of it.
I a former Republican who see’s that all of the Republican’s want and continue to do is try and bring racism and hate to an already stressed world. Obama’s message on Wed. night was we cannot be divided when we are at the worst financial crisis in America. I AGREE. WE are ALL American’s (Unlike what we are told by Palin) we all LOVE our country and want what will get us out of it. DO you honestly want another 4 years of what we have had? Can you imagine if something were to happen to McCain and we had to depend on Palin. I am sorry but that scares me more than anything…..
MRS. Palin I have a no respect for someone who uses her children to gain something from it. (just ask Alaska how much she has been paid to take her children along when not invited or to stay at home.) You have a wonderful family including a son with down syndrom like my sister. My sister had a career, however she decided HER CHILD needed her more and was the most important GIFT GOD had given her. Did she have to give up her career NO but I tell you Megan is better off today because of her sacrifice. Down Syndrom children along with all children need the love and support of there mothers and fathers as well as other family and frineds. MRS. Palin how long during the days and weeks since his birth have you held him. The first years are the most promising for these special children. YOU have missed out on so many milestones that I cannot even imagine. You state that your campain will be on Special Needs for chilren. GREAT but all of the money in the world won’t give you back all of the TIME you have missed.
Posted by: mcar | October 31, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Thats the whole premise of the progessive taxation system. The more you earn the more you pay in taxes…why is that so hard to understand! And those who make millions & dont wish to pay their fair share are selfish! I dont think that smacks of socialism…its merely what a civil capatilist society expects of us all. Or would it be better to continue with 8 more years of the middle class paying more & the rich less??? This notion that giving more tax breaks to the rich so they create more jobs overseas is absurd logic!!
Posted by: Dee | October 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Much of Barack Obama’s wealth is invested in tax-free investments handled by an inveestment firm that caters only to wealthy people. Apparently Barack doesn’t think that spreading the wealth should include HIS wealth.
Posted by: JB in St. Louis | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The number has dropped from 250K to 200K…Biden has hinted at 175K, and now Bill Richardson is saying 120K…the middle class in fact shrinking, but only because the DNC continues to push down the cutoff point.
Fact is, when a tax system ever threatens earners with a 50% or higher rate, the system becomes punitive, and dampens the incentive to achieve and produce more.
Explain to the person who is making just over 200K why he should take home less money than someone making 135K.
Posted by: rocky | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Under Obama I can stay middle class and have all my needs taken care of
—————
Yes, that’s what Obama is saying right?
That a 3% increase in taxes for those who make over $250k is “taking care of everything” for the middle class right?
The McCain supporter’s ability to oversimplify, exadurate,and distort Obama’s words is quite fascinating.
But perhaps they need things to be in simple terms?
Posted by: Simplicity for Simple Minds | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
if u become a millionare will u share your wealth with all your cousins and long lost family u dont know who may live in poverty? I think not
Posted by: deb | Oct 31, 2008 11:47:01 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++
YES, I would. Each of our family members sends $ to my elderly grandmother. If I won the lottery I would set my family up. Many other Americans would do the same for their families. Because unlike the bad opinion of Michelle Obama (which you obviousyl agree with) we are not a down-right mean country. In my state of Texas, a stranger bought back a foreclosed home and gave it back to the owner and then walked away. She didn’t even expect to be repaid. That is the country I live in. Not the bitter country Obama and MIchelle live in.
Posted by: S Adams | October 31, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Obama has bumped his head. This is the most generous nation there is. He’s got a nerve considering he has received close to 3/4 billion dollars from donors. Calling people selfish is not a good thing.
Posted by: Maria | October 31, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
If I had a quarter for every poster on ANY blog that uses this phrase; “I am a former Republican” I would take care of Obama’s relatives.
Is the astroturf getting a little slick?
Note; Ayers dedicated his book Prairie Fires to one Sirhan Sirhan.
How’s that for a little morning conversation?
On a closing note, Obama is fabulous at asking other people to share what they have, but LOUSY at sharing his own.
Just ask his aunt and brother.
Posted by: Brenda | October 31, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Posted by: Simplicity for Simple Minds | Oct 31, 2008 12:01:33 PM
+++++++++++++++++
Who wants to stay just mediocre? The beauty of this country is that you have the opportunity to aspire to great things. If you work hard you could become a millionaire.
Why put all of your blood, sweat and tears into making something of yourself, only to turn over half of your earnings to your neighbor that doesn’t have the ambition or ingenuity that you have?
This country gives the most to charity organizations. If money is forced from our hands, we tend to give less to worthy causes.
Contrary to what Obama and Michelle think, we are not a selfish, mean country. As seen after major catastrophy’s in our country and all over the world, we always come together to help out those in need.
According to Obama “White greed versus the world in need”–racist and untrue, as you can see from Obama and his own pastors excesses.
Posted by: S Adams | October 31, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Brenda, people HAVE asked his brother. What did he have to say?
“He said that he was furious at subsequent reports that he had been abandoned by the Obama family and that he was filled with shame about living in a slum. “It seems there are people who want to destroy me and my family,” he said.
“They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.””
I think he’s talking about you there Brenda…
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
marylou: “Under Obama I can stay middle class and have all my needs taken care of…”
Really? What fantasy land are you living in where a $1k tax cut and the opportunity to spend it on healthcare that won’t nickle and dime you is “hav(ing) all my needs taken care of”?
Do you have the vaguest understanding of what Obama has proposed? It’s hardly radical – we seemed to have no problems with encouraging development in the ’90s under a very similar tax structure. Last I looked, Ebay, Google, Yahoo, etc weren’t smoothered in their cribs by Clinton’s “socialism.”
Posted by: jhw539 | October 31, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
rocky: “Explain to the person who is making just over 200K why he should take home less money than someone making 135K.”
That would never be the case under ANYBODY’s tax proposals. I have never heard of such a thing. Where did you get an idea like that from?
Posted by: jock59801 | October 31, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Simplicity: I was agreeing with you! Most certainly NOT agreeing with Obama. My interpretation of the poem I quoted…along with Rand’s philosophy of the Virtue of Selfishness is that when we do our own best work, it has the potential of bringing out the best in others. Has that proven to be the case all the time? Unfortunately, not. But is it a view I am willing to sacrifice–absolutely not.
The type of redistribution that Obama speaks of will stifle competition–inhibit profits–send businesses overseas where taxation rates are lower and regulations are fewer. Why are so many of our telemarketing jobs overseas rather than here?
“fairness” isn’t a virtue–it is an ideal. Opportunities are not created through taxation…they just simply are not.
Posted by: Michelle | October 31, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
We need to redistribute what you have so others simply have.
Obama has been clear — he’ll redistribute. He’ll penalize the rich, give to the poor, and we’ll all be better off. He’s been careful to be glib and dress it up in pleasant orator’s disguise. And the polls say Repubs and Dems alike are eating it up!
Posted by: Voter2Be | October 31, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Maybe this is bad news in Ayn Rand’s fictional world…
But her most famous pupil, Alan Greenspan, admitted that her philosophy was wrong. Not 100% wrong. But wrong enough to merit some regulation of wealth.
Stop trying to suggest that Obama is a socialist for recognizing what we have known all along. Capitalism is a great thing, but it is not the only thing.
Posted by: Blip | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
oops. I guess my last post should have been directed at S. Adams–not Simplicity. I agree with Adams-not Simplicity. Not that it really matters much. :)
Posted by: michelle | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Fact is, when a tax system ever threatens earners with a 50% or higher rate
—————-
39% is not 50% and is less than what we had under Reagan and the same as when Clinton was in office.
As I recall, the econmy was doing just fine in the 90′s.
Posted by: True, but.... | October 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Bill Richardson said in a radio interview (it’s on You Tube) that people who earn below $120,000 won’t get a tax increase. The goal post on who is wealthy just got moved again.
Is everyone at ABC unionized? LOL, won’t that be fun…card check and all.
Posted by: Barackula | October 31, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
If it’s selfish to want to keep as much of what you earn as possible, then I think most of us are selfish.
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Concerned in Ohio: Tell me, do you think we should all pay no taxes at all and just contribute as we see fit?
Here’s the thing, we have a progressive tax system now. McCain isn’t proposing to abolish it. The principle will be exactly the same under both McCain and Obama. The rich pay more (in percentage terms) than the poor and middle class. If you have a problem with that, you have a problem with both of them.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Dear Leader Chairman Maubama: “If it’s a great thing, and has lead to the greatest economy the world has ever seen, why would you want to go a different route?”
No one is proposing a different route at all. Returning to something like the tax brackets under President Clinton and the capital tax rate put in place by Reagan is “socialist” only to the most fervent member of the Republican Party of Ignorance.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 31, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
True but …economy was doing fine in the 90s because Internet was new/growing, AsiaPac was beginning its growth spurt, European markets were beginning to grow again, and the investment markets were flush w/cash. Taxes are the least of it.
Posted by: OLD | October 31, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
The ideal of sharing wealth, equalizing class divide has been so powerful, swept half a Europe and Asia and South America in the first half of the 20th Century.
The ideals of Marxism are not necessarily wrong; in fact, they extremely appealing, and the history of the 20th century is proof.
Yet, none of the practitioners have achieved their noble cause, each has left millions, in smaller places like Vietnam and Cambodia, and 10s of millions in larger states. The only major survivor of this practice is China, who has adopted capitalism by all means except some certain rights that we enjoy here as granted – which is a different topic.
Socialism, a precursor of Communism, has never had a chance practiced in the US. Progressive taxing is Not socialism, and charity and creating opportunities for the common good are not communist either.
Few really know what socialism is, but what 0bama wants to do IS socialism.
0bama is masterfully adopting the classical class divide of Karl Marx, playing one class – the 95% of the society – against another class – the rich, the 5%. It is not progressive taxation.
It is the class struggle that is at the heart of socialism/communism, stupid.
Posted by: d0 | October 31, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
zeke: “If it’s selfish to want to keep as much of what you earn as possible, then I think most of us are selfish.”
We live in one of the most generous societies. If you worship every penny you earn, then you are in the minority – most of us donate to charity, support family, etc.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 31, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
“I’m sorry, why should I strive to work harder, if the fruits of my labor are going to be “stolen” and given to somebody else who chooses not to work as hard? It just doesn’t make sense!”
Do you know anything about how our tax system works? That happens right now! The rich always pay more. If you want a flat tax system, you have a problem with both McCain and Obama. Your options are pretty limited.
Honestly, the idea that the difference between a healthy capitalist system and evil socialism is a few percentage points in the highest tax bracket in a progressive tax system is idiotic.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Aengil,
What is your definition of rich? Obama’s keeps changing daily.
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
The ideal of sharing wealth, equalizing class divide has been so powerful, sweeping half a Europe and Asia and South America in the first half of the 20th Century.
The ideals of Marxism are not necessarily wrong; in fact, they are extremely appealing, and the history of the 20th century is a proof.
Yet, none of the practitioners have achieved their noble causes, each has left millions dead, in smaller places like Vietnam and Cambodia, and 10s of millions in larger states. The only major survivor of this practice is China, who has adopted Capitalism by all means except some certain rights that we enjoy here as granted – which is a different topic.
Socialism, a precursor of Communism, has never had a chance being practiced in the US. Progressive taxing is Not socialism, and charity and creating opportunities for the common good are not communism either.
Few really know what socialism is, but what 0bama wants to do IS socialism.
0bama is masterfully adopting the classic class divide of Karl Marx, playing one class – the 95% of the poor – against another class – the rich, the 5% to achieve his ambition.
It is not progressive taxation that makes 0bama a socialist.
Posted by: d0 | October 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
jhw539,
I do take care of my family. I do donate to charities. I do pay taxes. I do like to have as much control of the money I HAVE EARNED.
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“Few really know what socialism is, but what 0bama wants to do IS socialism.”
No, it isn’t.
“”Obama is about as far from being a socialist as Joe The Plumber is from being a rocket scientist,” said Darrell West, director of governance studies at the Brookings Institution”
“Bruce Carruthers, a sociology professor at Northwestern University: “Obama is like a center-liberal Democrat, and he is certainly not looking to overthrow capitalism. My goodness, he wouldn’t have the support of someone like The Wizard of Omaha, Warren Buffet, if he truly was going to overthrow capitalism.”"
“Robert Roman, who edits the newsletter of the roughly 250-member Chicago chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America: “Obama’s going to be a person who represents all of us, he’s going to be representing the interest of the capitalists as well as the working people. He’s not really talking about transforming society beyond capitalism.”
Obama isn’t proposing socialism and he’s not a socialist. The only people who’d think he is are people who don’t have a clue what socialism is.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
It begins… first it was about money, then patriotism, now selfishness.
As a double-earner family (2 small kids) getting close to the $250K, I’ve never thought of us as wealthy. We own a moderate house, drive 2 moderate cars (one minivan and one commuter car), and live within our means (mortgage that’s almost 1:1 with our current earning, no extravagant vacations, use the library, shop at Kohls/Target/Walmart, cut coupons, put some into 401(k), some into college funds, some towards savings/retirement). There’s not a lot left for “dicretionary” spending, and I’m constantly worried about how vulnerable we are financially in case something happens (one person loses a job, illness, accident, etc).
And yet I’m considered “wealthy”? Sure, just like Warren, Oprah,Wall St execs … just without the trust funds, substantial reserves, or the need to keep working in order to pay for our lives and our children’s futures.
But hey – Im just being selfish for thinking that another % point here or there on taxes impacts my retirement,my kid’s college, or my ability to save for a rainy day. What’s my security/peace of mind, when I can pay for someone else’s retirment, college tuition, or health insurance?
Thanks, friends. When you bring me down to the level of needing government assistance, will you be happier?
Posted by: DIWK | October 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
“Secondly, like I said before, I don’t believe BO about this. It won’t be just a few percentage points.”
See, if you’re going to base your decision on what you make up about one candidate, your position is essentially imaginary. Good luck with that.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Lets do away with taxation. That solves the problem.
I never liked paying taxes anyway.
I earned my money, well I inherited most of it, but why should I do anything to help our nation get out of the mess we are in now? I didn’t cause it.
Screw those who need “help”. They are all lazy and unwilling to strive to succeed like me. I am better than them!
It’s mine. All mine!
Posted by: True Patriot | October 31, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
We’re not making up the fact that Obama said he’ll only increase taxes on those who make over 250K, then his infomercial said 200K, then Biden said 150K, now Richardson says 120K.
We need a solid answer on what RICH is.If you want everyone paying more taxes and being “patriotic” and “unselfish”, say so. Shouldn’t those terms apply to everyone and not just “the rich” ??
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
This piece sounds like a McCain sound bite.
Obama’s speech pretty clearly says that he believes in capitalism – loud and clear – but this piece parses one line to make some obscure reference to the nutcase Ayn Rand. Has anybody looked at Wall Street lately? Brilliant ideas about unregulated capitalism just cost millions of people their retirement and college savings – I guess that doesn’t count when you’re way too young for retirement and your kid is way too young for college – but for the rest of us – it’s really, really tough to watch OUR HARD EARNED DOLLARS go down the drain because of unregulated corporate greed.
Maybe a more relevant reference would have been Alan Greenspan – an ardent follower of Ayn Rand’s, who helped create this mess. “those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders’ equity (myself especially) are in a state of shocked disbelief.” Those of us who are not multi-millionaires, or don’t have millionaire daddies, are really in shock, Mr. Greenspan. And you helped put us here – you and a press corps who supported a bankrupt Republican agenda every step of the way.
Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
True Patriot,
I’m glad you didn’t use stereoypes. That would be the same as being racist.
Posted by: nuts for obama | October 31, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“His entire voting record speaks to taxing at will”
Nonsense. His voting record over the past decade is pretty centrist. Recently including things like voting for the Patriot Act renewal and FISA – both things that enraged the few radical leftists in his base but were good, centrist law votes.
Posted by: jhw539 | October 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
dO Obama is doing exactly the opposite. He is trying to bring us together. Sarah Palin is trying to create a class divide (“Real America”) and doesn’t care if she rips the country apart doing it. That’s not what I’m looking for in a leader.
Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Is voting PRESENT being centrist? Sounds non-commital to me.
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
zeke, none of those statements are mutually exclusive. Saying “people earning 120K will get a tax cut” DOESN’T mean that people earning $130K will get a tax increase. It just means people earning 120K will get a tax cut.
Obama’s campaign has a tax calculator on his website, you can go and use it to see exactly what Obama proposes.
Now if you don’t believe what it says? That’s your decision, but if you choose to fantasize about what he might do and base your decision on that, you are inherently basing your decision on a fantasy.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I am listening to what he says…that seems to be the problem. He says a different number everytime he talks.
Posted by: zeke | October 31, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
The Financial Times reports that Lazard Capital Markets gave thusands of dollars worth of gifts to Fidelity brokers – against SEC regulations. (I didn’t know there were ANY SEC regulations… but I guess a couple remained after Phil Gramm was done). Gifts included a $50,000 bachelor party which reportedly included a dwarf-tossing competition.
I love to see what unregulated, Ayn-Rand style free market capitalism does with my investments – which come from MY HARD EARNED DOLLARS. Don’t you?
Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
zeke: “I am listening to what he says…that seems to be the problem. He says a different number everytime he talks.”
No… he doesn’t…
I think the problem here is that you’re just hearing the ‘number!’ and not actually paying attention to what that number relates to.
For example, you hear “No-one earning less than 250K will get a tax increase” and “Anyone earning less than 200K will get a tax cut” and you’re all, “Hey! That number changed! What’s going on?”
Whereas the first is saying who would get a tax increase and the second is saying who would get a tax cut. The implication is that people inbetween would find no change in their taxes.
Less than 200k = tax cut.
200k to 250k = no change.
250k+ = tax increase.
Get it?
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Vote ~ Obama and Biden Ticket~~~~
This is not going to be a recession. This is going to be worse than the Great Depression. ~~~
You history buffs out there know the Great Depression was causes by Republican Majorities in the 1920s that lead up to the 1929 Stock Market crash! The 1930s were the years of the Great Depression and it took a Socialist, FDR to get America back on track. It took him almost 10 years to do it. ~~~~~~~
McCain becomes President, and 99% of Americans will suffer under a Great Depression that will go on for many years. ~~~~~~~
Obama becomes President, and 99% of Americans will suffer hard times for two or three years before he can get things turned around. It will take Obama two terms to get this mess straightened out. He will have to spend his first days as President reversing all the Bush/McCain programs and policies in all areas, and then he can spend years cleaning up the mess and years more making repairs. ~~~~~~~
It always takes a Democrat that leans to the left to get America to the center! Eight years of a right wing low IQ Religious fanatic caused this mess. ~~~~~~
This is not the time for some senile old man with a right wing nutcase VP to step in with 20th century solutions to 21st century problems. This is the time for a high IQ 21st century thinking person to take charge, and that would be Obama. ~~~~~~
Obama will be much like FDR! He will save America if elected. ~~~
Posted by: drevelyn2 | October 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Dear Leader: And the economy that Alan Greenspan. George Bush and Phil Gramm have brought us is NOT a nightmare? I know people who are having to pull their kids out of college because their savings was destroyed by an unregulated market – which Phil Gramm and Alan Greeenspan created. A huge sector of the press, with a notable Nobel-prize winning exception, just sat back and watched it happen – or worse – spent their time and words on church bulletins and baracloungers.
Posted by: Mara | October 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
zeke – it’s tax cuts under $200k, taxes stay the same $200-$250k, taxes are raised $250k+. No idea what Biden said since I generally don’t pay attention to him.
Posted by: mmartin908 | October 31, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Next argument: racists.
Posted by: Tommy | October 31, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
So it was selfishness when Obama refused Harry Reids request for some of the funds he was receiving? I thought so……….
Posted by: ctmom | October 31, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
drevelyn2: “You history buffs out there know the Great Depression was causes by Republican Majorities in the 1920s that lead up to the 1929 Stock Market crash! The 1930s were the years of the Great Depression and it took a Socialist, FDR to get America back on track.”
Good Lord!! Talk about revisionist history … Roosevelt’s policies EXTENDED a recession into a depression. It took 15 years and a reversal of exhorbitant tax policies for America to recover from Roosevelt.
Everytime the government intrudes on private enterprise things go south. If left alone, the market continually corrects itself. Government intrusion can make things look good in the beginning, but long term effects are devasting.
Prime example is Carter’s Community Reinvestment Act which was given teeth by the Clinton administration forcing lenders to give loans to unqualified applicants. The result is what you see today.
Throw your history book away.
Posted by: darwin | October 31, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
It’s funny the other day I went to the site that Jake had listed to use the little tax calculator. I put in different figures just to see the differences and at something like 110,000 Obamas taxes went up and McCains still gave a pretty good deduction. Well today I tried it and it said I probably wouldn;t get a refund under their plan, but didn’t compare the two plans. It’s funny how he changes things to suit their purposes.
Posted by: Maria | October 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism, but under the name of Liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program until one day America will be a Socialist nation without knowing how it happened” — Norman Thomas – Socialist Party Presidential candidate Civil Liberties Union,” Houghton Mifflin, 1976
Posted by: Diane | October 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
zeke: “I am listening to what he says…that seems to be the problem. He says a different number everytime he talks.”
No… he doesn’t…
I think the problem here is that you’re just hearing the ‘number!’ and not actually paying attention to what that number relates to.
For example, you hear “No-one earning less than 250K will get a tax increase” and “Anyone earning less than 200K will get a tax cut” and you’re all, “Hey! That number changed! What’s going on?”
Whereas the first is saying who would get a tax increase and the second is saying who would get a tax cut. The implication is that people inbetween would find no change in their taxes.
Less than 200k = tax cut.
200k to 250k = no change.
250k+ = tax increase.
Get it?
———-
First off, you don’t get it.
1) Obama started off his economic plan saying INDIVIDUALS making $250,000 or above will be taxed. He never spoke about families.
2) He then changed course a month again and said INDIVIDUALS making $200,000 and FAMILIES making $250,000. (just shifted $50K).
3) In his infomercial he said “Here’s what I’ll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year.” (Just moved another 50K).
4) Since he’s gone down $50K each time between families and individuals, I will now take Joe Biden’s word that individuals making $150,000 will get a tax cut.
Where does that leave individuals making between 150,000 and 250,000? He won’t say because his policies are continually shifting
Posted by: Brian F | October 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
I have made decent money most of my adult career, even though I had to hustle to keep employed. Downsized almost continuously over the last fifteen years. I have taken advantage of my 401K, but to do that, I gave up vacations, live in a modest home , put down big downpayments, and bought a new car only once every 10 years. I don’t have a cell phone, an IPOD.
What motivates me to establish a little wealth? I have 9 brothers and sisters who simply weren’t born with the wherewithal to do what I can do. I hope to leave them some money so they don’t have to live on the public dole.
Now, let’s say I have 1 million in assets and will get a pension. Some of you may call that “fortunate” and feel those savings should be taxed rather than given to my brothers and sisters – four of whom still live with my mother.
Why would I even want to share it with the poor living in Brack obama’s neighborhood? That neighborhood already gets 85% of its school funding from outside the district, has about one murder every other day, a rate that continues to rise?
Keep in mind that I have always paid for schools neither I nor my family members use, as a single childless person, pay a high tax rate.
The choices I made are the reason I will have a comfortable (not extravagant) retirement. Those choices are largely available to everyone. I did not come from a wealthy family. My father worked three jobs most of his life.
As for who is going to have their taxes increased – why everyone who has any income at all. When only 2% of the people make over 250,0000 and 40% don’t ppay federal income taxes. Well the numbers don’t work unless taxes are increased on everyone.
I live in Barack Obama’s county. The sales tax went up this year to the highest in the nation, both school districts in my community are looking for tax increases, and so is the village. Income redistribution is occurs at every taxing body, at every level of government. I think it is time to say enough is enough. Jennifer Hudson’s mother, brother and nephew were killed in Barack Obama’s neighborhood. A child is killed there – I’ll bet one a week. In today’s paper, I read that 85% of the children living in the city of chicago are labled as low income. I also read ttoday that the workers that man the garbage trucks have a daily absenteeism rrate of 30%. And that a recent study sshowed that the workers who show up in the department of streets and sanitiations work about 6 hours a day. Contrast that with my workdays over the past 7 years of 10 hours a day, and never being ill, or taking vacations for more than 2 days at a time.
I don’t trust any politican to use our money wisely or to spend it for any reason other than to get votes.
Posted by: Mary OK | October 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Jake
The Khalidi on the PCPRS is
Ahmad Mubarak Khalidi
NOT Rashid Khalidi
FYI
Posted by: drjohn | October 31, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Obama the uniter;
‘typical white person.’
‘They cling to their guns and religion.’
‘They will say that I am black.’
‘white folks greed runs a world in need’
‘they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.’
Posted by: drjohn | October 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Hello Mr. Tapper,
This and other comments are leading me to think that either the OB campaign is getting tired and flawed or that they really have no idea what they are promising as it appears to be comment du jour.
Biden at the VP debate was against gay marraige, then I heard a clip of him on the lesbian comedians show saying he would support gay marraige. Not for or against this subject as I do not think this is a critical juncture in our nation right now, but the underlying question I have now is:
Do these two even know what they are doing anymore?
Posted by: jdubya | October 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Obama should tell Biden to donate more than around .1 percent of his income to charity, like he has been doing the last ten years (note the decimal).
Golden tenent of phonies: Do as I say not as I do.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 31, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Ugh….does Obama really think that this is how the marketplace works? Does he really think government can create wealth that way?
Posted by: Brian | October 31, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
This reveals the basic underlying philosophy of the Left – that one cannot possibly be charitable unless they use the government to redirect their funds. Obama assumes that people who don’t want to pay higher taxes are somehow “selfish”, but that’s only true if one assumes that the so-called rich won’t do anything else with their money except sit around like Scrooge McDuck, counting it constantly. Most people today invest it, which creates jobs, or spend it, which creates even more jobs, or donate it to charity — which works much more effectively and with much less overhead than filtering it through government bureaucracy.
Those who earn the money want to direct it in the manner they see fit, in the most efficient manner possible. That’s not selfish, it’s just common sense. Only someone in love with government power could see it as anything else.
Posted by: Aaron Burr | October 31, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
You can already make more of your life. Get off your butt and work for it. Quit spending $200 for tennis shoes, quit spending $500 for a cell phone when you’re driving a Neon with the tires balding. It is ALREADY reachable to make your life better. By giving you free money transferred from my wallet isn’t going to make things better for you. The breadlines existed under FDR, another Democrat, and stretched until the 40′s.
Posted by: Timmeh | October 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
He is a Marxist, plain and simple.
Makes you wonder about those supporting him.
Posted by: D. Marshall | October 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
He wants “everyone to be rich”?? That’s straight out of John McCain’s mouth! And how the heck will everyone have more money left over at the end of the month and still pay the taxes necessary to support all of Obama’s programs? This is just ludicrous.
Posted by: Granna 2 3 | October 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
let’s quite the backbitting and vote your choice. Because many of these changes have to carried through congress. As of now, I am not please with any of the chocies they have made. Its seems that the government is trying to buy a good economy; just let if fail like the government let failures of the homeowners, the job markets, gas prices, and food prices. It seems as though if no one can buy the products what would it matter even to the rich. I choose to vote for OB.
Posted by: Florence Scott | October 31, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“…when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month…”
This is not the role of government unfortunately. That’s the fallacy of his argument. It’s the role of government to make sure the infrastructure is there for us all to make this happen for ourselves, not to determine it for us.
Posted by: Skowronek | October 31, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Grotesquely rich people acting offended at the idea that should lose an irresponsible tax giveaway and bear their fair share of the tax burden is indeed, very selfish.
Posted by: Ken S. | October 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I liked Obama a few years back, but after researching his policies….or lack thereof…..NO WAY! People are controlled by the blinking box they watch every night though….try reading. McCain 08!
Posted by: daniel | October 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Look at all of Obama’s relatives living in poverty! Look at Obama’s and Biden’s minuscule charitable contributions! Who is selfish? Studies show that conservatives give much more generously to charity than liberals. That’s because liberals believe the government should do everything. Conservatives take responsibility for helping their neighbors, but they like to choose the charities themselves. The Federal Government is not their favorite charity.
Posted by: Anne | October 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Is it selfish to want to keep what you’ve given a substantial portion of your life to earn…or is it selfish to demand that someone else give up a portion of their life to satisfy your greed?
Obama is pandering to greedy people who don’t want to go out and work 60+ hours a week to succeed. They want everything handed to them with minimal effort on their part.
Posted by: Dale G | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Trickle up. How does one get a little extra without a job?
Posted by: jc | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Selfish like the Biden’s who gave a fraction of a percent to charity or selfish like Bill Gates who is donating most of his fortune to a charitable foundation.
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Why doesn’t Obama begin by giving some help to his wretched relatives who all seem to be living in squalor
Posted by: Donna | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Selfishness? Obama’s tax plans will cause large ,medium and small business to lay off employees or go out of business. Yeah thats caring for the workers, punish the employers to help the employees who won’t have a job. But hey the Gov’t will give jobs digging ditches along the road for $7.00 per hour, so caring brings tears to my eyes.
Posted by: Tobias2012 | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
So anyone who does not believe in income re-distribution and welfare is “selfish”? Anyone who votes for Obama deserves to have their money taken away.
Posted by: ash | October 31, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I am an America who chooses to form my opinions on facts. I appreciate you letting the facts come through and unfortunately that is a rarity within the Media these days. I believe Obama wants Americans to begin the process towards European socialism an idea which most all of us do not understand. But I am tired of Obama labeling those with titles that are untrue just because one does not share his views. Republicans are either racist, selfish, etc….this is a weak way of defending your ideas and it completely shuts down any reasonable discourse. Thank you.
Posted by: Carrie | October 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
If I take money from my neighbor in order to make someone I deem need, better off, it is called “stealing” and I get thrown in jail. If the government does it, it is called welfare.
If I do not have the right to do so, why does the government??? Washington has legistated power to itself that was never the people’s right to give.
Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
According to the news today, the threshhold for wealthy earners, per the Democrats themselves, has just been dropped to $120K.
As for charity, I give a lot more than .1 to charities and sure as hell make a lot less than either Biden or Obama.
Posted by: elizabeth | October 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Now if there is anyone left in the US that DOESN’T know that Barry Hussein Obama is a Marxist and he plans to punish those that have worked hard in this country, then they must be brain dead.
Fortunately, there are far too many Americans that see Barry for what he is and Democrats for what they are. It ain’t gonna happen lefties. You will not be able to overthrow our country this time. No matter how much help you may have from foreign money, George Soros, and ACORN.
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | October 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
A very important point to remember is that the bottom 20% in the EU pay a very healthy tax: in excess of 20%.
In the US, the bottom 20% pay nothing.
And the bottom 20% in the US is better of that much of the middle class in Sweden.
The US penalizes the higher earners more than any other country in the world. We hit the rich on taxes harder than the UK, Japan, Sweden, etc.
This is important because when you actually pay taxes, you care about how they are spent.
In the US now, the bottom 50% don’t care a bit about how its spent. They just keep voting for more stuff.
This is so unlike the EU.
Posted by: alan | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Yes I am selfish. I donate more to the POOR than Joe Biden,. In fact I make less than half of what Biden makes and Donate 10X what he donates. Selfish me. Biden makes 250K and donates 340.00 a year. Now thats SELFISH
Posted by: Dennis D | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Hey Idiots,
Look what the Dems have done to the state of California. Yea blame Bush.
Posted by: BearManPig | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Read “Atlas Shrugged” by Ayn Rand if you want to know what is about to happen under Obama.
Her debunking of the “altruism myth” of the left wing is spot on for these times.
Having “self-interest” is a virtue.
The true greed in America is coming out
of the left wing losers looking for a hand out.
“Thou shall not covet” – has been repealed by the loser left and turned into “give me my share”.
We are about to see American immolate itself in an orgy of gunpoint prodded sacrifice.
The “party of peace” is about to send out an army of tax collectors to force everyone to pay for all this “sharing”.
Posted by: John Galt | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Gooood Lord…. we’re over taxed as it is and for us to dare to want to keep more of OUR own money and not send it to Obama to redistribute is SELFISHNES?!?!?! God help us if this Socialist is elected!
Posted by: Gary | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I suppose Obama not helping out his extended family and his lack of contributions to charity, paint him as a pretty self-less guy huh?
How can Obama accuse others of being selfish when he is one of the most self-serving people out there?
He has done nothing for his constituents. What makes voters believe that he would do anything for them? Past deeds are indicative of future ones. Also, with his friends/associations there seems to be a common theme. He himself admits in his books that he sought out radicals.
Posted by: Bev in NC | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I am not sure where Obama gets his #’s on small business, but I am sure it’s not accurate. We too are in the 250,000 to 300,00 range, with 1 employee. The only party that has ever spoken up for small business are the Republicans. The Democrats throw us under the bus…they laugh and say they don’t know any plumbers small businesses that make over 250,000. It’s probably true, they probably have never talked with owners of small businesses. We work from 12 hour days, 6 days a week. We take no vacation, buy our own health care for our family, plan and save for our own retirement(we have no big company supplying us with 401′s)dig the holes along side our workers, sell the jobs, work the books, help employees out when they need a hand, clean the office and don’t complain. Then the democrats tell us that they are going to take our money and give it to “hardworking” American’s. How did we let them hijack the term hardworking? As we get up every Saturday to go to work we see others in our neighborhood(middle class) going off to have fun in the sun…on boats or vacations. I think that’s good and I am happy for them, but remember all America really should give us is an opportunity. It’s up to each individual what they do with it.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Obama, a very wealthy man, but allows his own Aunt to live in poverty in the slums of Boston has a lot of nerve calling anyone selfish.
Posted by: David Arnold | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Trickle up economics?????
In all the efforts of one person (Obama) to help other persons (“working people” and “middle class” people) using other peoples’ (taxpayers’) money, who comes out as looking compassionate and who looks selfish?
Obama deserves ZERO credit for wanting to “help” people with money that’s not his.
The ones who deserve representation are the ones forgotten by Obama’s policies, the ones who PAY for him to be able to dole out cash through the government to people he deems worthy.
Posted by: Raul | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
I am already making plans to cut my earnings to 250k….no, 200k…..no 150k…..no, 120k……………….
GOD HELP US!
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
By the time Obama is done anyone who has a paycheck will be ” The Rich”
Posted by: Dennis D | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Sorry Mr. Obummer — gov’t is not supposed to create jobs or provide health care. Please move to Cuba where you will be much happier and you can run for dictator there!
Posted by: NOBAMA | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Why do I feel like Im in a nightmare? Somebody wake me up, Please. How could Obama get so far in our political process with some empty promises, good looks and good speeches? Im cringing at peoples blindness…
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Seems I’ve heard this before. Divide and conquer. Anyone ever remember any presidential candidate using this tactic before to get voted in. This guys talks out of both sides of his space. Be concerned about suppression of freedom of speech. GET OUT AND VOTE TAKE MANY OTHERS WITH YOU TELL THEM TO VOTE> VOTE MCCAIN
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
It suprises me how many people feel the wealthy are not paying their fair share when in reality they are carrying almost the entire tax burdon.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Warren Buffett and Paul Volker and Robert Rubin and General Powell are all supporters and endorsers and advisors of Senator Obama. Now that is a cabal of Communists and terrorists!
Posted by: Bruce Josloff | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Who is selfish? Obama lives in a million $ mansion while his half brother in Kenya lives in a shack and his “favorite aunt” in Boston lives in poverty. His ego is so big that he doesn’t even realize that his actions are completely opposite to what he preaches others should do. A real socialist alright. Preach to others how they should behave, but have a different standard for yourself. Hypocrisy is what its called.
Posted by: Harry in Mexico | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
if you raise my taxes Mr Obama i won’t have “a little more money at the end of the month … ” you will take away my hard earned wages so i have less at the end of the month!
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Jack Tapper a real news man for ABC!! Pleasant shock and amazement! Great insight very interesting point of view.
Posted by: bdawg | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I would describe selfishness as the act of a man who is a millionaire, and then lets his half brother live in a shack in Africa on less than $20.00 a year. To add insult to injury we now learn that his dear aunt that he named in his book and he stated he would take care of financially is living is abject poverty in Boston. Heck, the poor woman cannot even afford a decent cane to help her walk.
Obama is a disgrace. Voters trust him to take care of their needs and he will not lift a finger to help his own family. If Obama takes care of your family the way he takes care of his own relatives that he has promised to look after … you are screwed.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
i wish obama was going to lose so i could continue to be exploited by the rich. i love how devalued the american worker has become. i sure hope those rich people continue to provide me with my devalued job(s). i sure hope they dont go start a commune up in the mountains to teach us all a lesson.
Posted by: francisco d. | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
It seems Mr. Obama doesn’t know the meaning of Socialism. Let this guy just keep talking and the Republicans won’t have to say another word.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Obama is the one with a brother in a mud hut in Africa, and an Aunt living in the projects all while he and his wife make 6 figure incomes and he has the gall to lecture anyone on the concept of “selfish?” Can anyone name ONE FAMILY MEMBER this man has helped out and lifted up?
Nope.
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
So I’m racist, and selfish.
What’s next Obama?
I don’t want to share my apartment with illegal aliens?
I’m buying JIF peanut butter while others can’t afford the bargain brand?
How dare I think I should be able to drive my car every day while others have to take the bus.
Shove it Barry!
Posted by: Bobolinski | October 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The “share the wealth” doctrine amount to lttle if any real shift in wealth. It will create a more government controlled, anti business, state like Europe where it’s even harder to get ahead. Yes, it will get $1000/yr more in the hands of the middle class and yes, it will make it even harder for citizens to breal out from their current econimic state and get to the next level.
Posted by: R Crawford | October 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Obama has made personal attacks on those who disagree with his campaign(e.g., voters in PA are racist; Joe the Plumber isn’t really a plumber; and now those who have made money are selfish). Does this strike anyone as unusual for a presidential candidate?
And being taxed on one’s labor is a questionable practice in and of itself. I certainly do not think that those who build up small businesses and work hard and reach a certain level should be punished for it. And, guess what? To those people worried about the economy: poor people don’t employ people. Rich people do. If you overtax employers, they make cut backs.
Why in the world would Obama want to raise taxes in this economy? It could be an economic diaster.
Posted by: katherine | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Sad to see the blatant socialists/communists come out of the woodwork and from under their rocks and caves. Could you please wear a red star on your forehead so we know who the real enemies of our country are?
And good luck with overthrowing our Constitution.
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“Trickle up” economics is nothing new.
The Philippines is a good example of the results of such a concept.
Posted by: ALS | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Okay, I think I have it now:
1. Wanting to pay less of the money you’ve earned to the government is selfish.
2. Coveting the money earned by other people is unselfish.
My poor foolish parents just had it all backwards when they raised me.
Posted by: Marx Alot | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Gooood Lord…. we’re over taxed as it is and for us to dare to want to keep more of OUR own money and not send it to Obama to redistribute is SELFISHNES?!?!?! God help us if this Socialist is elected!
SCARY SCARY stuff coming out of Obama’s mouth
Posted by: gary | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Selfishness? Obama/Biden charitable contributions on their tax returns are pitiable…until Obama decided to run for President when there is an uptick. Biden’s is still laughable based on his income. Sure, leave it for the government. Obama should talk with his auntie in poverty…throw the lady a bone, big guy.
Posted by: Else | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Selfish…gracious he is arrogant in making that statement.
It is selfish to want and buy what you do not need; it is selfish to receive a salary that is obscene while the workers in your company are being laid off; it is selfish to want something for nothing-not to work and not to put in an honest 8 hours of work.
The only thing that needs serious change in America is its political system–it is far too liberal and corruption is a huge iceberg.
We have freedom and liberty in America that is a blessing and Obama and the Democrats want to change America.
I love America–I can speak freely about what I think is wrong with the government–under Obama you will find secrecy and censorship of the media and the people
In America you have freedom of religion yet the liberal agenda of Democrats has picked at that freedom and now we cannot pray in school, cannot pray in public and being a Christian is offensive…wrong…Christians are generally more tolerant than others but are not afraid to speak out when they see something wrong.
Obama is set to change the tax codes–you will pay and those who do not work will receive something for nothing…just watch how many people leave the workforce…watch companies leave America because they are taxed to death and watch small businesses crumble after achieving the American dream–all because of taxes and “spreading the wealth”.
Obama is a Socialist; Obama is a Marxist. The Democrats have been leaning toward Socialism since the Johnson years with progressive entitlements “for the people”…and all the while the government is beginning to own the populace because they provide for them…
won’t be long before you will be doing exactly what the government tells you to do because they provide it all!
Posted by: pat in Arizona | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Obama’s been saying for months is that the only people who will pay his ” punishment tax ” for achievers will be only for selfish people who EARN more than 250K per year. Last week it was down to 200K. Now it’s down to 120K. By inauguration day all of you selfish jerks who earn 80K or more will also be paying his punishment tax.
Posted by: David Arnold | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
The more the wealthy pay for government, the more they own government. The majority of the super-wealthy are democrats. With Obama’s election, they will have sewn up the ownership of the United States.
Posted by: Prospector | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Here’s another Randism for him…I was not born into this work to be a means to his ends. The fruits of my labor are not his to divvy up. I earn a paycheck to support myself and my family. I pay taxes for vital services like roads and law enforcement. If I have extra, I might choose to give some to the needy. But I will not be used as a tool to make all his little boats float.
Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
BIDEN IS SELFISH!
$2,500,000 earnings.
$0,003,600 given to charity.
That’s just over .1%
LIberals are so generous with my money, not their own.
Posted by: Maria | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Here’s another Randism for him…I was not born into this world to be a means to his ends. The fruits of my labor are not his to divvy up. I earn a paycheck to support myself and my family. I pay taxes for vital services like roads and law enforcement. If I have extra, I might choose to give some to the needy. But I will not be used as a tool to make all his little boats float.
Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Based upon Mr. Obama’s track record of shameless charitble contributions (available on his website) prior to his book deal (look it up), he already thinks selfishness is a virtue. He wants to contribute your money to help the poor, not his. Shame on him!
Posted by: Action | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
How about this..
All the 50 million Idiots about to vote for that Commy Socialistic Moron, get to
give back their money to help the No Good sit on your butt welfare taking, hands out bums in this country.
I am not giving MY money to anyone but me!!!
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I could call someone who wants to be the most powerful person in the world and who will say anything to get elected “selfish” as well…
But I could add “ego-maniacal,” “conceited,” and “self-absorbed.”
But mostly I call them “Obama.”
Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I’m sure Obama wont mind if we start with taking some of his $ and Ayers, and Michelle’s. Then Rezko’s, Farakhan’s. Then we take Rob Reiner’s, Ben Affleck’s money, Laurie Davids, and all the other left wing slugs who want more from us for others.
Posted by: Last Exit | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The rich are not paying their fair share! They are paying their fair share and a lot of other people’s fair shares, too!
Our current income tax structure is nothing less than twenty-first century slavery. The slaves don’t pick cotton anymore. The government picks the slaves pockets instead.
Posted by: Don | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The bailout is a perfect example of where our taxes go – to pay for big bonuses & parties, buy up small banks, etc. That’s $700 billion coming from my kids. Now another $400 billion to buy up homeowner loans……People, we are going downhill and this class envy crap is exactly what the far left wants. Obama has yet to tell us where it’s coming from. Well it ain’t coming from the poor. Wake up and put a stop to Reid and Pelosi.
Posted by: Dee | October 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
How are rich people being selfish when the top 1% of income earners pay 40% of the income tax burden? How are low income people not being “selfish” when the bottom 50% of wage earners only pay 2.7% of the tax burden and our asking for a handout. It sounds like low income poeple are the ones who are being “selfish”
Speaking of being “selfish”, how much of your income did you or your running mate donate to charity over the last 5 years Mr. Obama? Less then 1% each. That sounds oftly selfish does it not? Maybe you could have stopped being “selfish” and helped out your aunt or brother who are both living in povery. I guess the 5 million dollars you made off your book was not enough money for you to stop being “selfish” and stop acting in your own political best interest.
Posted by: Andrew DeLorenzo | October 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I keep hearing how Obama will bring us all together. How in the name of GOD will someone who has run his entire campaign based on class warfare bring us together.?
Is he going to ask Pelosi and Reid to step aside. After all they are two of the most polarizing members congress has seen in ages.
How does he plan to bring both Black and white together when every time anyone has critized him, they have been accused of being racist.
This man is even more polarizing than Reid and Pelosi and you fools keep thinking he will bring the country togethr. Not very likely
Posted by: joe, farmington,NH | October 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I am so sick of his line that every kid should be able to go to college. EVERY kid in this country can go to college. it’s called working your way through! A state college is not that expensive and if an 18 or 19 year old can’t work and make at least half of what they need to go to school maybe they don’t really want to be there! Suck it up kiddies, my 3 three kids worked there way through college while taking a full load and keeping there grades up, and oh yeah, they still had time to party.
My tax dollars owe you nothing if your too damn lazy to work for it yourself!
Posted by: kim | October 31, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Mara – nice try at blaming Palin for class warfare. Obama has been using class warfare for YEARS, his entire political career. In fact, he used it on Hillary. Palin has only been on the scene for a scant FEW MONTHs.
You have a very convenient memory.
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Assuming I make $250,000 (or $200,000, or $150,000 depending on whether you listen to Barack, Joe Biden or Barack), what happens when my taxes increase?
I can take less money home to my family,
I can pass the cost along to my customers, or
I can lay off one of my employees.
I made my decision.
Posted by: Bert | October 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
lets look at the people Obama wants to tax. these people worked through college, graduate school and have huge education depts to pay off. they paid their due to get a good job in a high tax bracket. why punish them? because they are sucessful and work hard? the top 5% of wage earner already pay 60% of the income taxes collected. they pay more then their fair share already!
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
What arrogance. Liberals love to give money away. As long as it’s not their own.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Obama is sounding more like a communist every day.
so its selfish to keep my hard earned money that i worked feverishly for, just so some shmuck who is too lazy to pick up a phone can get my money?
This is the land of OPPORTUNITY…..not the land of GIVE AWAYS.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
opportunity in America abounds…there are ways to achieve your dream if you are willing to “work” and achieve it. The problem with a lot of people is that it isn’t respectable to work anymore…they want it without effort and they want the salary of a rockstar/CEO without the effort
Posted by: pat in Arizona | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Bill Gates was not born rich. Warren Buffet was not born rich. Henry Ford was not born rich and oh so many others weren’t either. They had the incentive to work hard. Do I envy them? Yes, but I don’t believe they should pay my way.
Posted by: Linda/Michigan | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
just get out and vote… republicans!!!… WORDS OUT THAT THE MSM AND THEIR POLLS ARE TRYING TO DISCOURAGE REPUBS BY SCEWING THE POLLS. LOOK AT THE NYT…. 17 POINTS AHEAD..THATS BS…JUST GET OUT AND VOTE!!! IT’S ALL A SCAM MCCAIN IS ACTUALLY LEADING IN EARLY VOTING IN MOST STATES!!!
Posted by: fly on the wall | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Folks, it’s not too late: VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Bares repeating:
“Here’s another Randism for him…I was not born into this world to be a means to his ends. The fruits of my labor are not his to divvy up. I earn a paycheck to support myself and my family. I pay taxes for vital services like roads and law enforcement. If I have extra, I might choose to give some to the needy. But I will not be used as a tool to make all his little boats float.”
Amen.
Posted by: John Schuh | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Let us not forget Mr. Obama,that giving these welfare checks and basically discourages challenging oneself to be better. Colleges will end up closing, because students will see they can collect money while sitting on their duffs. What happens to hard work rewards you? If you study hard you will succeed? If you get a college degree you will earn more over your lifetime? We will become the kicking block for all of these third world scumbags. Not to mention, what then happens to the best equipped, most technological armed forces the world has seen. This will all disappear under Obama. Sorry Mr Obama I am not taking that chance..
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
It seems selfishness has been redefined. I prefer to donate my money to charity (at a much greater rate than Obama/Biden combined) I might add. Let’s review: according to Obama/Biden I am a selfish, unpatriotic, clinger to guns and religion. This is the audacity of hope/change? Change is all I will have left if they are elected.
Posted by: Kevin | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
The top 10% of wage earners pay 71% of all income taxes already. In fact the top earners now pay a larger share of the tax burden than they did when Bush took office. This notion that the rich are swimming in tax breaks and loopholes is absolutely ridiculous!
Posted by: Q22 | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Charity, legitimate Charity, is comprised in personal help effected in a matrix of Christian Morality where the results of one’s efforts can be clearly seen and monitored, the optimal situation of course being helping individuals help themselves. In some cases that’s obviously impossible. The individual cannot help himself or herself in any effective way in which case direct help, however ultimately gradational, is obviously required. The closer the giver is to the recipients of the Charity effected, the better, so as to optimize the situation in every way – morally, socially, temporally. In every way. Obviously.
Govt programs, while necessary to some degree, inevitably give rise to corruption and inefficiency, and often (usually?) to real immorality and social damage (e.g. ‘welfare’ as commonly understood) while broadly effected secular socialism and communism can and do give rise to real evil, murder, wars and all the rest of it.
Posted by: Andrew Eppink | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
mmartin908: FYI Greenspan is a liberal democrat. Thanks for pointing out his obvious faults.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away men’s initiative and independence. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they COULD and SHOULD do for themselves.”
-Abraham Lincoln
“I think the best way of doing good to the poor is not making them easy in poverty, but leading them or driving them out of it”
-Benjamin Franklin
“To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his fathers have acquired too much, in order to spare to others who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equaled industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, ‘to guarantee to everyone of a free exercise of his industry, and the fruits acquired by it.’”
-Thomas Jefferson
“The utopian schemes of leveling [redistribution of wealth], and a community of goods, are as visionary and impracticable as thouse which vest all property in the Crown. [These ideas] are arbitrary, despotic, and, in our government, unconstitutional.”
-Samuel Adams
Posted by: forliberty | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Redisribution is really reparations.
Posted by: Don | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“I keep hearing how Obama will bring us all together. How in the name of GOD will someone who has run his entire campaign based on class warfare bring us together.?”
Joe-here’s your answer. We will all be standing in the same WELFARE lines. The shortest and most lucrative line will be for the Obama worshippers and the longer, slower line with less available will be for the rest of us. See you in the slow line!
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I’m so shelfish, that I am willing to give up my larger tax break- according to Mr Obama’s tax calculator, in return for our democracy.
Posted by: skiman | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Just remember:
Obama bin Biden
Abomination
Posted by: spam4u | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
francisco d.,
How devalued will your jobs be when you do have a chance to get one because those who could hire you can’t because they are overtaxed? By the way, how are you going to pay for food when sales taxes go up? Yes, do you really think these tax and spend folkw will stop at income tax. Wake up.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Let’s see… McCain has contributed over $1,000,000 to charity in the past 10 years, while Obama has donated about $10,000. Sarah Palin and her husband have donated in the past two years more than Sen. Biden has donated in the past eight years combined. This is true all across the board when it comes to the amounts Democrats and Republicans donate respectively. Who are the selfish ones?
Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
YES WE CAN–VOTE FOR MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
I think it is selfish to want government to take money from someone who earned it and give it to me. What message do we send to our kids? Work hard in school so that you can earn money that Obama will give to the slacker who sits next to you and doesn’t do any work?
Posted by: Herb | October 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
The only thing that small business owners can do if obama is elected and they have to pay higher taxes, and either not promote or let go personnel -take a walk through the parking lot and everyone that has an obama sticker, fire them first. Hey they voted for redistribution of income and they will feel it first hand.
I have to believe from reading a lot of comments on different blogs, some small business owners and anyone investing in the market are looking at alternatives and considering taking their ‘ball’ and leaving. Why would someone want to be taxed to death so some deadbeat that thinks work is a bad four letter word can reap the benefits. yep socialism at its best.
God Bless America and may she always be free
Posted by: enchanted | October 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Obama; Why is your aunt living in a slum in Boston???
Why does your half brother in Kenya,exist on a dollar per month???
And you call us selfish???
Posted by: Rick Clarke | October 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Give me a break! Selfish are the hordes of people with their hand out wanting to take that which others have earned!
Posted by: TxSon | October 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
hard earned dollars??!!
lololololololol
yeah I’m sure Cindy McCain worked harder then Firefighters and Marines.
screw all the rich snobs and their apologists
Posted by: Robert | October 31, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I’m amazed anyone votes for Obama? Are we so stupid we’ll elect someone who just talks a good game? What is going to give to pay for his programs (healthcare for all, etc)? Will it be defense spending? Will it be our taxes? We need to start holding people accountable for their own state versus giving a never ending handout.
Posted by: M&M | October 31, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Obama said that one of our society’s greatest failings is not having helped the “least of these.” Obama thinks that the top 5% of America is obligated to help the bottom 40%, who pay no taxes. However, Obama himself does not even help the “least of these,” not even his own family members. There have been reports of at least three Obama relatives, two of them living in the US, who live at or below the poverty level. Why is it that Obama hasn’t done anything to take them out of that poverty situation?? Obama’s record simply does not match his rhetoric. His words do not match his actions.
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
>>when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off.<<
Ah yes.. the PROBLEM is that if you tax the people who MAKE those products they LEAVE. Then.. the "end of the month" YOU are talking about means paying for goods form other than America because NO ONE will be producing anything Barack!
Which leads me to the other "little" problem with your design.. If there aren't jobs those people will NEVER have a little left over at the end of the month Barack!
You may act smart but.. you're nuts.
Posted by: jona | October 31, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“I keep hearing how Obama will bring us all together. How in the name of GOD will someone who has run his entire campaign based on class warfare bring us together.?”
Joe-here’s your answer. We will all be standing in the same WELFARE lines. The shortest and most lucrative line will be for the Obama worshippers and the longer, slower line with less available will be for the rest of us. See you in the slow line!
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I have been working consistently for 30 years. Every year prices go up and I keep paying my taxes. Now Obama says I should pay more and if I can’t afford it I am selfish. This is complete BS. I have my own bills to pay. If someone wants to have a decent life, go get a job and stop depending on everyone else to work day in and day out to pay for their lifestyle. I didn’t go to college but I went to a Technical School and leaned a proffession that I have been working at since 1978. Leave my paycheck alone so I can afford to take care of my own Family.
Posted by: RAZ | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
drevelyn2
you have read to many revisionist history books. what really made Roosevelts economy was WW2, it put Americas work force gack to work and making money creating expansion.
Posted by: Dr. Know | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Why is it selfish of people who work hard for their money to want to keep as much of it as they can??? How about the government keep its hands off our money for a change?? I think I know better then to government how to best spend my money. This is funny calling people selfish when this man gave 5% in charitable donations last year. This from a man who’s own brother in kenya lives in a hut, who’s own uncle was just evicted, and who’s own aunt lives in a slum in boston. Charity Mr. Obama begins at home not with the government. I give 10% to my church and 5% in charitable donations.
Posted by: j from ohio | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
get out and vote!!! Mccain/Palin!!! the polls are B.S. the MSM are all LYING!!! the polls are wrong!! GO USA!!
Posted by: Noel | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
This guy is just nuts. The problem with socialism is that it takes away any incentive to excel or go the extra mile. Why would I bother to go to law school or medical school, if I’ll make the same as a software engineer? Taxing people that make over 250k a year 70% of their income will have the same effect, genius…
Posted by: Thom Chode | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime.” -Lao Tzu
Obama has it all backwards, and I suspect he knows this. He does not care for the poor because he wants us all to be poor. Liberals feed on misery.
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Brian F: You, too, don’t understand the difference between ‘no increase under 250k’ and ‘cut beneath 200k’. They’re not different. They both refer to cut below 200k, no change between 200 and 250k, increase over 250k.
And to those putting so much weight on the supposed plight of Obama’s half-brother, several newspapers have spoken to him and found that he’s quite happy. He also says your comments are all lies: “It seems there are people who want to destroy me and my family. They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
that was funny – a interview in Harlem NY about who they are voting for
Posted by: Harlem | October 31, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Yes Senator Obama, you seem to be very giving with other people’s money.
How very thoughtful of you.
So if we refuse to support you that’s considered racist.
If we don’t want our hard earned money to be redistributed to the lazy that makes us selfish.
I guess that makes me a selfish racist.
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
You can tell a person’s heart by how they PERSONALLY contribute to charity when no one is looking. Take a look at Obama’s and Biden’s charitible contributions over the past couple of years. They want to give away our money but not THEIRS!!!
Posted by: Bee | October 31, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
For any of you out there that believe you will see one red cent if Obama is elected, you are going to be furious when you never get anything.
” JUST WORDS,JUST SPEECHES.”
With Bush I got 2 1200.00 checks and my taxes didnt go up and niether did anyone elses. Elect Obama, and see what the annointed one does for you!
Posted by: DAVID | October 31, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
1990′s??? 401k Lost 52% of value in 1999-2000. Only 33% down in this “great depression”.
Posted by: cheewee | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
This isn’t about giving money to the middle class and its not about being selfish. Its about income redistribution. Its about taking money from the the top earners to give it to the middle class….so he can buy their votes!
If Obama is so worried about the middle class then why doesn’t he just advocate a middle class tax cut without the tax increase? How about drilling domestically to make energy more affordable for the middle class? Remember, this was the guy who didn’t have a problem with $4 gasoline, he only had a problem with how fast it went up to that price. Is $4 gas good for the middle class?
Obama is a fraud and he is trying to pull the wool over the middle class becaue they represent the largest block of voters. He knows he can’t win with only the support of the left wing loon from DailyKOS or the Huffington Post. They onyl represent a small percentage of the population.
Wise up middle class. Obama thinks you are stupid as well as racist and selfish.
Posted by: Valerius | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
It takes lots of work to make a country run. Many of us wake up every day to put our shoulder to the grindstone that is work that makes this country run.
Seems to me that the truly selfish ones are those that don’t get out there and work and instead let us workers carry all the load and then have to pay some of our hard earned money to them for sitting back and watching.
I paid my own way to college working nights and weekends. State colleges are open to any resident at a resonable cost. I personally don’t want to foot the bill of some other guys kids to Harvard.
Posted by: Jethro Johnson | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
i’ve never written in all caps before … so apologies …
OKAY … GET THIS STRAIGHT, OBAMA!
I DONATE 10% AFTER TAX!!
SO I’M NOT SELFISH!!!!
BUT WHEN THE FED TAKES MORE MONEY OUT, THAT’S 10% OF A SMALLER AMOUNT OF TAKE HOME PAY. THAT MEANS THAT MY TWO CHARITIES (THAT HELP HOMELESS/POOR THROUGH JOB TRAINING) GET LESS TO DO WHAT THEY DO BEST!! THEY ACCOMPLISH WHAT THE FED GOV’T COULD NEVER ACCOMPLISH!!
OBAMA, YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!
I FULLY EXPECT YOU TO TAX PEOPLE LIKE ME DOWN THE ROAD, EVEN THOUGH I DON’T MAKE $250K. YOU AND THE DEMS WILL COME FOR MY 401(K) TO SAVE YOUR SORRY, BROKEN SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAM. AND THEN YOU’LL RUIN THAT, TOO!
GUESS WHAT?!
29 STATES WILL HAVE BUDGET SHORTFALLS IN 2009 (THEY WERE OVERSPENDING BEFORE THE CRISIS) … THEIR BUDGETS ARE DEPENDENT ON BUSINESS REVENUES. THEY WILL RAISE TAXES TO COVER THEIR MESS … OBAMA’S TAX PLAN WILL SUCK THEM DRY WHILE THE STATES SUCK THEM DRY. OBAMA’S TAX PLAN IS AT ODDS WITH STATE BUDGETS. THE ONLY WAY TO RESOLVE THIS IS WHEN OBAMA CENTRALIZES GOVT TO COVER FOR BANKRUPT STATES … WHEN HE DOES THIS
THE
PEOPLE
LOSE
FREEDOM
OUR LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS ARE WHAT KEEP UP FROM BEING COMMANDEERED BY A FED CENTRALIZED GOVT.
DON’T YOU SEE WHAT THIS MAN IS DOING?
DO OUR COUNTRYMEN NOT UNDERSTAND THAT OUR CONSTITUTION WAS TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING … FROM HAVING OUR FREEDOMS USURPED? THE FRAMERS OF THE CONSTITUTION UNDERSTOOD THAT CONTINUED FREEDOM COULD ONLY COME BY KEEPING THE FEDERAL GOVT IN CHECK — A LEAN AND FRUGAL FEDERAL GOVT. WHO CAN YOU NAME IN CONGRESS THAT IS FRUGAL?!!
I CAN’T BELIEVE THIS!?
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Thom Chode: Are you serious? You do realize the rich get taxed more right now don’t you? We already have a progressive tax system.
Do you seriously think a few percentage points in the highest tax bracket ‘takes away any incentive to excel or go the extra mile’?
Sheesh.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“McCain/Palin have kept pushing their argument that Obama’s economic policies are far left. Well, the “Economist”, the well-respected, conservative economic weekly, endorsed Obama yesterday.
Who’s the real centrist, folks?”
What makes you think that The Economist” is centrist? Not in American terms. Writers like “lexington” has never done anything but condescend to the ordinary people of the United States. Their “sort” are the Wall Street types which fleece us the country and have contributed heavily to Democratic candidates forever.
Posted by: John Schuh | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Type “Yes” if you’re voting for McCain/Palin
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words redistribution of wealth.
She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.
One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had t o be the truth and she indicated so to her father.
Her father responded by asking how she was doing in school. Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn’t even have time for a boyfriend, and didn’t really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying.
Her father listened and then asked, “How is your friend Audrey doing?”
She replied, “Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She’s always invited to all the parties and lots of times she doesn’t even show up for classes because she’s too hung over.”
Her wise father asked his daughter, “Why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.”
The daughter, visibly shocked by her father’s suggestion, angrily fired back, “That’s a crazy idea, how would that be fair! I’ve worked really hard for my grades! I’ve invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!”
The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
You referenced Ayn Rand! Atlas Shrugged! KUDOS – there are a few of us out here!
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Cradle to the Grave, baby!! That’s what Obama’a supporters are after. they want to be taken care of from birth to death. When the government gets so big that it can do that, it can take everything you possess, including your freedom, drive, ambition and your sanity. Can’t go there with you. I will cling to my God and my guns, love my family, help my friends in need, work until I drop, play that much harder and VOTE McCAIN/PALIN!!! I encourage you to do the same.
Posted by: Larry Grizzle | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
To understand the tax implications at different rates you need to understand the marginal tax rate. I earn (yes earn) $112/K a year. On my way up I learned that certain tax breaks and other vehicles were no longer available to me. So not only did my income tax rate increase, but I “lost” the ability to get deductions that I had previous received. Tax saving from an IRA are also a thing of the past.
The net result is a much higher marginal tax rate than I had paid before. So, while The Leader positions himself to take even more of my hard earned money, I’ll be thinking of all those thing I would have done that helps drive the economy. That includes:
- start my own business (direct job creation)
- save & invest (inject money to help others start/grow business)
- buy a new BMW (which give some guy/gal in SC a job building them along with the whole distribution/sales chain)
- go out to dinner & entertainment (spend cash with local business who have employees)
- play golf (well, I’m still going to play golf)
So yes Dear Leader. Take my money and I’ll stop driving the economic engine.
Signed – Mr Evil
Posted by: Fat Tony | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
How much of a disparity of income needs to exist in our country before some of you cry “foul”? The trickle-down effect is BS. Bush’s tax cuts aimed at the wealthy, and you can see the results. OF COURSE a super wealthy candidate wants to keep their tax cuts. Do you really think that a corporate CEO that makes $5 million a year provides new jobs with his or her tax cut? We’re in a recession, and it’s the rich people that need help? For most of us in the middle, a tax cut sounds pretty good.
Posted by: bartonizer | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
So…Robert, Mr. Hardworking MAN…are you standing there with your hand out waiting for some money that doesn’t belong to you? Well, pick up a shovel and a hammer and come work at our small business 12 hours a day until you are covered in mud and sweat, and then we will put some money in your hand and send you home to get a few hours sleep, before it starts all over the next day.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
obama: “i’m the keeper of my brother. i’m the keeper of my sister.”
yet, as rich as he is, his aunt lives in the slums of boston and his brother lives in a hut in kenya on $3.00 a year.
if he doesn’t take care of his OWN family and relatives, how’s he going to take care of you left-wing nuts?
Posted by: alex | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Why doesn’t he donate some of his $600 mill election war chest towards his cause?
Posted by: occincin | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Two Choices:
Pay more taxes = Vote Obama
Donate the difference in your taxes to the national debt = Vote McCain
Setup a means (and incentives) for us to pay down the debt and put rules in place to prevent deficit spending that work.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Robert says -
“screw all the rich snobs and their apologists”
Probably similar to the mindset of Sirhan Sirhan when he killed RFK. NO worries for Obama, he’s friends with Ayers who says poor ole Sirhan is a political prisoner. Hey, Ayers says kill your parents! Who cares if they are rich or not?
Cindy McCain has proven with her time and money (she runs a business) that she has a generous spirit and heart and reaches out to help others? How many kids has St. Obama adopted? How many surgeries for poor kids has he paid for? Michelle paid for? Hell, Michelle turns the poor away at her hospital.
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Here’s a novel idea. How about everyone pay their fair share. 20% across the board for everyone.
Posted by: Offtrack | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Take a look at Biden-Obama tax returns. Biden has averaged around $400 a year in charitable contributions. Obama over the past two years HAS given some donations but prior to that—with a $200,000+ salary, he was giving less than 1% to charity. Yes, these two champions of the down and out have sure put money where the mouth is. I guess it is okay when the money given comes from someone else.
Posted by: Ken Althoff | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Obama knows a thing or two about selfishness, he sees it every day in him and Michelle. Take a look at their charitable giving: under 2% in recent years when they made more than $250,000. He says it was due to “student loans”.
Posted by: martin | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Economically, I would be among those who Obama wants to “share the wealth” with. He would be taking from those who have to give to us, who are struggeling to make last months and this months mortgage payment… as well as lights, gas and other utilities. We always seem to be struggling to make it.
The beauty of America, though, is that I still have a chance to make it and I want to do it. BUT, there is no way that I want it handed to me. That would destroy the oportunities that exist for the lowest among us to reach heights only dreamed of in other lands. NO Mr. Obama… leave the money where it is. The top money earners already pay the majority of taxes… and we, at the lower end, need to start paying ours.
Leave the USA the way it is… except, you in the government need to get out of our way so that those of us at the bottom can make our way up without you in our way.
Posted by: Jeff S | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
That is the most socialistic garbage I’ve ever heard coming out of an American’s mouth!
I hope Obama sliced his wrists on that kind of damning of American – SELFISH? What county gives AMERICA money??
We shell out dollars every day to poor countries, to charities, our churches send members (who take their vacations) to build Habitat homes, UNICEF, Red Cross, Jerry Lewis Telathon. We give till it hurts!!!
Posted by: GG | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
mara said: It will take Obama two terms to get this mess straightened out.
————————–
Obama doesn’t even know what two terms are – he thinks 2 terms is 10 years, not 8. He thinks we have 57 states, not 50…the man can’t count!….Plus you don’t fix the economy by more and more spending, which all of his plans would do. Is that how you would balance your own personal budget?
You don’t stimulate the economy by increasing taxes on ANYONE during a recession…that will cause a GREAT DEPRESSION that makes 1929 look like a blip on the radar of American history.
Posted by: JazzyKat | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
“young people can all go to college”? In what world????? Most young people are barely qualified to graduate from high school!!
Posted by: J. Alejandro | October 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I guarantee Obama will not give one cent of his money to anyone. Typicall Stalinist. I’d rather die poor and free then take one cent from another person by force or handout because of socialism. I’ll earn my own money thank you.
Posted by: Walter | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
I have a right to be selfish with my own money. And if I want to give some of my money to the church, or the women’s homeless shelter, or to the Red Cross, or to the lady who cleans houses, I have a right to.
But no one – NO ONE – else has a right to tell me how to spend my money.
NO ONE, OBAMA!
Posted by: meg | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Obama lovers/Independents. please wake up. They are placing the race card to get you to vote for him. Typical scare tactics of a Socialist. If his policies worked why is his part of Chicago the most impoverished? Why do they have the highest crime rate? Just before the great depression this was tried (raising taxes on just the upper income earners)and guess what we ended up in a 10 year depression. Why? Small business owners will lay people off, no one in their right mind would start a business and yet others will take them overseas. Don’t you get it??
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
What I always find interesting is that both parties ***** and complain about stuff -until it works in their favor. Like the huge disparity in donations and campaign spending.The one I always love is ” the Rich should pay more” but the one’s saying that still keep right on using every single loop-hole so they don’t have to pay. Barry, give us a break,live it don’t just preach it. OBAMA is just another talking head that happens to spin real well. His bobble head doll will be the most life like.
Posted by: Indypendent1 | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
“Why doesn’t he donate some of his $600 mill election war chest towards his cause?”
Posted by: occincin
Forgettaboutit! Obama won’t even donate his cash to HIS OWN PARTY! Harry Reid had his hand out months ago and Obama said “no”. How’s that for such a fine example of sharing the wealth?
Posted by: MrsCinTexas | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
and btw, how badly can the middle class be doing if they can afford to send the Messiah $600,000,000 in donations? $100,000,000 of that came in the last month when the economy was supposedly tanking.
It looks to me like Obama supporters have more money than they need.
Posted by: Valerius | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Hey bro no fair complain’n about me and my people buying fancy phones. Those cheap sets always crap out in the middle of a drug deal and that gets in the way of my income. Which is in cash so I don’t worry bout taxes. and my main squeeze is on every gov. program they ever thought of. so we is sitting pretty. We don’t own a car as that is not allowed under the gov programs so we just lease a big short which is allowed. That is why there are so many big cars in the hood. they all be leased and paid for in cash.
Posted by: joe, farmington,NH | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
All politicians would do well to remember that taxes are collected at the point of a gun. It isn’t selfish to object to having what is yours coercively removed, and it isn’t generous for a politician to try and improve the world with other people’s money.
Posted by: brennan | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
This is the same mentality an armed robber has. It’s not YOUR money, it’s HIS. You just happen to have it.
Remarkable.
Posted by: Bill Chicago | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
It’s not that its selfishness to be opposed to the Obama taxes, its more of not wanting the government to be able to dictate when and how you are supposed to give back. When the government has the kind of control then you start dancing the fine line of communism
Posted by: matador | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
What’s the matter guys?….Feeling a bit guilty?????Am I my Brother’s keeper??
Posted by: leo | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Wait until the College students who are so in love with Sen Obama, mainly because they think they will be getting checks in the mail, along with pre-paid loans, wake up to the fact that Sen Obama along with Rangel an Murtha, will be bringing back the Draft. Once they start cutting Military spending, those who have Volunteered will return to Civilian status, an recruiting will go in the tank. As a Senior who is looking forward to the Checks Sen Obama is going to be sending out, I must say that I would be foolish not to vote for him.
Posted by: George | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
All politicians would do well to remember that taxes are collected at the point of a gun. It isn’t selfish to object to having what is yours coercively removed, and it isn’t generous for a politician to try and improve the world with other people’s money.
Posted by: brennan | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
I’ll save you from Obama.
Posted by: Chuck Norris | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Like a good coersive utopian, BHO trots out the the guilt trips. Not gonna work BHO.
We as a people have formed a government to provide us with certain services. We must pay for those services. We have decided to tax ourselves and establish a progressive income tax scale. Those who make more shall have a slightly higher income tax rate. THIS NOT WHAT BHO IS TALKING ABOUT.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul does 4 very bad things.
1) Paul is marginalized and enabled.
2) Paul does not aspire to be Peter..who wants a gun to your head. Exceptionalism and excellance are attenuated…mediocrity is advanced.
3) Peter can no longer afford to hire Paul
4) Peter hides his money from the taxman…our economy suffers from it absence
Posted by: chubby | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Okay, let’s do the math. We have a $10 trillion debt; both McCain and Obama voted to spend another $700 billion in taxpayers money on Bush’s bailout package, McCain wants to spend $300 billion buying up bad mortgages, both McCain and Obama have health care proposals that will cost hundreds of billions more, and we’re spending $10 billion a month in Iraq. Myself, I have no interest in passing on all that debt to my kids, grandkids, and future generations. If I had a $10 trillion Visa bill and a $500 billion household budget deficit, my top priority would be trying to get myself out of debt. It definitely wouldn’t be to keep spending borrowed money. Is that selfish? In my books, that’s called being fiscally responsible.
Posted by: Hiking4T | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
“if he doesn’t take care of his OWN family and relatives, how’s he going to take care of you left-wing nuts?”
With someone else’s money…namely you the taxpayer’s money.
Posted by: Emmett Flatus | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
What’s amazing here is someone who wants to take more of someone elses property, calling people ‘selfish’ *because they resist*.
The selfish ones here are those who see the property of others as something to be used to serve their own visions or ends, regardless of how noble, and who are more than willing to back the use of force to get what they want…other people’s property.
It’s as selfish as it gets to back threatening your fellows with jail unless they hand over their property for your ends.
Posted by: MtnGoat | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
It’s not that I don’t want to be “patriotic” or want to be “selfish” (seriously though–give me a break). I am adamantly opposed to paying ANY additional taxes until those in power clean it up in Washington. Why in the world should anyone have to pay more in taxes when there is so much waste in Washington. When they keep adding earmarks. First, they need to clean it up and then, AND ONLY THEN, should they come to the taxpayers to do anything more than we are doing now. Why would anyone be willing to pay more? For someone to expect taxes to be raised on a group of people, no matter how rich, and to think it’s ok–makes no sense to me. To me, that is selfishness–on the part of the takers. And no, I am NOT one of those who is supposedly in danger of having taxes raised–IF you can believe O’ talking points. Actually, if O is elected, to me,that is just more of the same–out of control spending. Out of control spending + higher taxes == an alcoholic on a drinking spree.
Please vote for the only team that has a hope of change–change for the American people–and that’s McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Liz | October 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
All boats rise?
Doesn’t that mean they are emptying?
Posted by: LTC8K6 | October 31, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
I’m a believer in selfishness, however, I am fairly opposed to the monstrous machine of destroyers that make up the McCain/Bush beneficiaries. Wealth built on exploitation through force, greed, and croneyism is not noble, per se. I think the majority of rich patriots will be voting Obama, because there is an intellectual realization that the course of this country is not exactly blemish proof. Yes, returning to pre-Bush tax cuts is a dream deferred, however, the necessity for re-investment of profits, bringing American jobs back home, far outweighs the need for further exploiting failed experiments. With tax breaks for creation of American jobs, and for reinvesting in American infrastructure, I don’t buy this doom-and-gloom Obama would take it all away from us scenario.
As an independent, I’m also absolutely blown away by the lack of planning and clarity given to us by McCain Palin. What exactly would they DO? Sorry, but Alaska is the exception to the rule, and nationalized oil revenue distribution won’t do the trick.
The economic policies of the 90′s that made this generation of wealthy are similar to the ones Obama advocates returning to.
McCain, while an interesting figure, does not seem to be willing to intellectualize the economic challenges that face us as a nation, and thus seems prepared to hand off our country’s fiscal policy off to the very people who built the Bush debacle.
It was our founding fathers who advocated access to education being the key to democracy. Was John Adams socialist?
It’s interesting how much blubbering hatred crops up in response to your article. Do you feel aligned with the Hank Reardens of the world when you rile up this crowd, or to the Jim Taggarts?
Posted by: Luke Janela | October 31, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Of course he did not read The Virtue of Selfishness. He was too busy reading Rules for Radicals. If he had read Rand’s works, he could not possibly mistake Mc Cain for selfish. In fact the one thing in common that Obama and Mc Cain share is their altruistic premise. Their economic principles diverge only in how much government should grow and who should pay for it.
Posted by: Jorge Vazquez | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Hey Obama,
Bite me! I am selfish and my family appreciates my selfishness… Oh by the way how much did you donate to charity last year ????
LOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSER !!!!
Posted by: Ferd Berfall | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Posted by: John Schuh:
I agree with all your comments about Lexington and The Economist. I thought I was the only reader who found it deeply annoying.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
‘A lot of rich people would leave me struggling to deem their dollars “hard earned”.’ –jozsef stalin
And who are you to “deem” anyone’s money hard-earned, or not?
You people are thieves, period.
And Democrats are just the fascists to go ’round looking in peoples pockets to determine “how much is enough” for them. Our country has never been like this. The “CHANGE” the socialist democrats seek will destroy this country. Individual freedom cannot coexist with socialism.
You labor is PRIVATE PROPERTY. Fight to keep the Democrat parasites from stealing it from you. Without PRIVATE PROPERTY all other rights do not matter.
Today’s Democrats have nothing for you but degrees of sacrifice and slavery.
Are you ignorant enough to trade freedom for “free” stuff?
“Socialism is great until you run out of other people’s money.” — Margaret Thatcher
Posted by: Boucheau | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Vote for McCain and send this SOCIALST packing back to Chicago.
The polls are garbage. Most of the media wants Barry Hussain Obama so bad they are lying to make it sound a done deal. It isn’t done. Dems are known for talking lots and not turning out to vote. Most of his new and swing voters will be sitting at home on Tuesday watching soap operas on thier new flat screens, hung over or high, on wealfare, too lazy to vote themselves a pay raise.
Posted by: Jethro Johnson | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
This democrat of 35 years along with the rest of the family are proud to be casting their vote for McCain/ Palin.
America with all her faults is the most wonderful country in the world and I want to keep it that way. For those of you who blame America for your problems, GET OUT!
Posted by: Linda/Michigan | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
It is called “Trickle-Up Poverty”
Posted by: WD | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
If I get a tax rebate more than what I paid from Obama, I intend to send it to the White House with this note, ‘Please return this to whom it belongs’. I will not accept ill gotten gain, even if it means I go without a meal!
Posted by: Jerry | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“Question for you Jake: Just how great does the disparity of wealth have to get before the USA stops being a democracy?”
Ed”
This is a guy who, so far as I know, has never had to sweat for a living. When he encountered Joe the Plumber, you can see he was ill at ease. Joe isn’t. He knows a phoney when he sees him. (I think ole Bar’ was physically intimidated by a guy who can look him straight in the eye and probably could physically take him apart.
Posted by: John Schuh | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
why does everyone seem to think the money is going to be taken from the “hard workers” and given to the “lazy people”?
I work my #$% off every day! I work all day, many nights, weekends, and I have a college degree. Guess what? I still don’t make that much money, and there is a freeze on raises where I work and I won’t see much in the near future.
Why should the rich get tax breaks? How about the people that actually need it? So many people want their truck and their boat. Well, maybe now they will have to just get a car and a boat so I can pay my bills and go groshery shopping in the same month. I am looking for a better job. I am a reporter –freshly married and out of college. No one gets rich in this business. My grandpa was laid off with six kids in his day. He fought his way back with a gas station business, but he sure didn’t want any Republicans in office.
Reagan’s policies are biting us in the $#%. Time for something new. A tax break for the rich is a Republican policy…and now all of a sudden a tax break for me is socialism.
VOTE OBAMA. For the real hard-working people that make America run and don’t get paid like executives.
Posted by: Pablo | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Does Mr Obama attibute his success in life to some government program that gave him a leg up, or was it from his hard work. Has he never heard the saying, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink. Giving people just enough money to get by, will never motivate them to work hard enough to reach for the top. Yes, there is a place for charity, but charity coerced is not charity it’s tax. The federal government can do so little efficiently. They should just stick to defense and leave philanthropy to those organizations which are specifically designed and more efficiently equiped to deal with the community needs for charity.
Posted by: Gayle | October 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Holy Crap, Obama! Did you just call Americans selfish because they don’t want to pay more taxes? I’d love to see that comment go across the nation in the next 3 days!
Posted by: DJ in AZ | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
If you dont want higher taxes you’re selfish. If you dont vote obama, you’re racist. If you dont support same sex marriage, you’re a bigot. If you dont support abortion, you’re ignorant.
i am done with the liberal complex.
Posted by: jdog | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Is Obama going to attack the participants in the Boston Tea Party as selfish, too? Give me a break.
If he wins, he’s going to do more harm to the Democratic party over the long term than Jimmy Carter did. They never seem to resist overreaching and it always backfires.
Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I do not want a tax cut at the expense of another’s tax hike. None of us should. Yet that is exactly the type of class derision and vote buying the Obama campaign is conducting.
The “rich” people of this nation (who by the way are also the producers of most of our goods, services and jobs) will remain “rich” precisely because they will continue to do the things that made them “rich” in the first place. They will find ways to protect their assets from the draconian tax policies of an Obama Administration. If this calls for such measures as cutting jobs in order to keep their businesses financially viable, they will do so. They will have to. Then you shall hear the shouts of “this is unfair, you mean, selfish rich people!!” from the media and the Democrats. But this will be an effect of their own causes.
When is the last time anyone got a job from a middle-to-lower-income person receiving an entitlement check? Like it or not, “rich” people are the ones who own businesses and create jobs. Yet we continually deride the “evil rich”, and for politicians, they make convenient scapegoats for swaying uneducated voters. You want to raise their tax burden even more? Fine. But don’t stand there all fish-eyed when your job is one that has to be cut to keep the business open.
Once the “rich” have protected themselves (or been bled dry) from the Obama tax plan, from whom then will the Obama Administration extract the necessary taxes with which to pay for their social engineering? The floor for their tax hike has already dropped from $250k to $200k within an hour (Mr. Obama said both of these figures in the last debate), to perhaps even $150k, per Mr. Biden’s latest quote on the subject. Gaffe? Or “foaming the runway”?
You are next. I am next. We all are. Believe it. Protect your assets now.
When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic. – Ben Franklin
Posted by: JohnGaltSpeaking | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Oh YES!
It IS absolute selfishness,
BUT
by THOSE ON THE NEW FEDERAL WELFARE!
Posted by: Peter913 | October 31, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Now we find out that Nobama’s aunt lives in a Boston slum! And his brother live in another slum!
CAN’T PART WITH YOUR OWN MONEY TO HELP YOUR OWN FAMILY??
Nobama says he is his brother’s keeper, and his sister’s keeper…too bad he is so hypocritical. He will help you but he won’t even help his family!!
Lord help us if Nobama is elected!
Posted by: Democrats Have Hosed America | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
To Aengil, who said:
“And to those putting so much weight on the supposed plight of Obama’s half-brother, several newspapers have spoken to him and found that he’s quite happy. He also says your comments are all lies: “It seems there are people who want to destroy me and my family. They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Yes, I am sure that he’s quite happy after having been instructed that he is not supposed to be talking to reporters anymore. Just like Obama’s aunt. She can’t talk until after November 4. Hmmm … I wonder why. Fine, let’s assume that he’s “happy.” Would it hurt Obama to help his half-brother out? He and his wife reported over $4 million in income last year. How about his aunt, who walks around with a make-shift cane? Bless her heart that she still donated $260 to Obama’s campaign. Obviously, she cares about him more than the other way around.
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Ummm… this coming from the hypocrite Obama who had to have a mansion in Chicago he couldn’t afford, so he worked with Rezko. A small, affordable house wasn’t good enough for him. He is the biggest bag of hot air I’ve ever heard in my life. For fun we have a drinking game where we count how many times Obama talks about himself in speeches he gives. He is awful, and egotistical, and a very nasty man.
Posted by: pattid | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man,
nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine. ”
–Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Posted by: Steven C,. Buttgereit | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Just more guilt from the Liberals:
* You need to feel guilty for being an American
* You need to feel guilty of racism if you don’t vote for Obama
* You need to feel guilty for making money
* You need to feel guilty for being successful
* You need to feel guilty for all the people that don’t get off the couch and get a job
* People that work hard and/or pay for their own health insurance needs to feel guilty for the people who would rather have cable and their flat screen tv then pay for health insurance.
Yup – just another guilt trip by the liberals!
I have no guilt!
Posted by: NCtostayRED! | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
OBAMA’s BIGGEST LIE, that nobody in the press has challenged, is that Bush RAISED taxes on the middle class. Everyone in the middle class got a tax cut under Bush, from 28% to 25% marginal tax rates. But he continues to spread the blather that Bush took money away from the middle class and gave it to the rich.
Vote for Obama and you get what you deserve, America.
Posted by: ed | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
We all act in our own self interest.
Obama is preying on selfish instincts when he offers people the biggest tax cuts.
I would support higher taxes to pay down the deficit–but to redistribute it to those who don’t work–no way. Call me selfish–I’ll call you a socialist.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
If some men are entitled by right to the products of the work of others, it means that those others are deprived of rights and condemned to slave labor. Any alleged “right” of one man, which necessitates the violation of the rights of another, is not and cannot be a right. No man can have a right to impose an unchosen obligation, an unrewarded duty or an involuntary servitude on another man. There can be no such thing as “the right to enslave.”
– Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness
Posted by: Ayn | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Those people at the bottom who don’t work for what they want need to leave America.
You dragging us down!
Posted by: libby | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
To hear Obama tell it, at least half of all Americans are suffering unbearably. Wow! Really? Last time I was in the States (2005), I thought everyone must be rolling in long green judging from the big, new cars choking the roads, the packed-full shopping malls, and the vast tracts of new houses springing up like mushrooms in rings around the big cities. Now it’s just three years later, and one out of two Americans gets his daily bread at local soup kitchens and live under bridges because the banks foreclosed on their homes. How far you’ve fallen, and how fast!
If things have really gotten this bad, then there’s nothing in the constitution stopping the have-nots from fleecing the haves at the polls. Just don’t believe that this will do the economy any good or that things will getter any better. If the haves pay all the taxes while the have-nots collect all the welfare, then who’s going to create new jobs, new technologies, and new ways of making money? Not the haves – their tax planners will have their money hidden from the IRS and the domestic economy before Obama is sworn in.
Get real, grow up, and do the right thing, Americans. Otherwise, I won’t have a decent country to move back to, someday.
Posted by: RCB | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
I wanted a bike. I thought riding it would would be fun AND help my health. I don’t have a lot of means right now, since I am paying my way through school. Anyway, I worked extra hard and saved my money and bought a bike. A sweet bike. I rode it and was very happy. Then it was stolen. I was quite upset. I couldn’t believe someone took my hard earned protery like that. This is a TRUE story. I was angry until I heard obama’s recent comments. Then I realize that even though I had worked hard for a bike someone else also wanted it. Someone with even less means than I have. I realized that I shouldn’t be angry… that I was being selfish… It is not right for me to want the bike I earned back.
Posted by: cruxNC | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Obama said in Sarasota, Florida, yesterday. “I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the America dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific. OBAMA IS AN IDIOT!! YOU WANT THIS MORON AS YOUR PRESIDENT? THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE ABSOLUTELY LOST IT!! ARE WE STAR STRUCK? THE MEDIA HAS MADE OBAMA LOOK LIKE THIS COOL DUDE. THE MEDIA IS ELECTING THIS IDIOT NOT THE SMART AMERICANS IN THIS COUNTRY. EVERYTHING THAT OBAMA HAS DONE WRONG HAS BEEN COVERED UP BY THE MEDIA. THEY REFUSE TO REPORT ON ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT OBAMA. THE “NOT SO MAINSTREAM MEDIA” IS CORRUPT!! A PERFECT EXAMPLE: WHERE IS JOHN EDWARDS?? THE MEDIA WOULDNT REPORT ON HIM EITHER AND WHEN FORCED TOO THEY DID IT FOR A WEEK AND SWEPT IT UNDER THE RUG. THEY NEVER MENTIONED HIM ONCE AT THE DNC. ITS PATHETIC. YOUR ALL BEING PLAYED LIKE FOOLS BY THE CORRUPT “NOT SO MAINSTREAM MEDIA” AND YOU SIT THERE AND TAKE IT. PATHETIC!!
Posted by: xinunus | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
That’s Obama speak for:
“from each according to his abilities and to each…. bla bla bla”
And so the lazy people can have left over money from the hard work of others?…ooookay??
Posted by: deef | October 31, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
How can I make $150 Million like Obama in September? Share with all like back in the USSR.
Posted by: bob | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I don’t want higher taxes because I want to be able to afford to give any extra money I have to people who actually need it. People who, through no fault of their own, have had a rough time and need help getting back on their feet. I am not interested in helping people who squander their opportunities because they would rather have fun than be responsible. That, my friends, is called consequence.
Posted by: Phoebe | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I take Obama at his word. Who better exemplifies the behavior then him, he lets his brother live in a hut and his Aunt in a Boston slum…
Posted by: Ingrid | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I take Obama at his word. Who better exemplifies the behavior then him, he lets his brother live in a hut and his Aunt in a Boston slum…
Posted by: Ingrid | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
M&M, I just called that number and you’re right it’s really scary to say the least.
Posted by: sandy | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Obama says he shared his toys in kindergarden, but he forgot to mention that he had that choice. The difference being, no one came along and took his toys and gave them to someone else against his will.
Posted by: Deb | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
The claim that rich people will fire employees due to a tax hike is ridiculous on the face of it. We are talking about personal income taxes, folks. If I’m a CEO of a Fortune 500 – tell me exactly why I start firing people because my income goes down? It seems nonsensical – and is obviously subterfuge. The top marginal tax rate will be raised to the level it was during the 90′s – which if we all remember was good times.
Posted by: evanz | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
To Bartonizer…
“Do you really think that a corporate CEO that makes $5 million a year provides new jobs with his or her tax cut? ”
Have you ever seen a $5 million CEO clean his own pool, mow his lawn, detail his car… need I go on? I guess the answer to your question is YES! Never have I seen a poor man give another person a job.
Sempre Fi
Posted by: I Baja | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Obama 08
Posted by: nice | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Thank you for that quote, Steven. Especially the latter part, “…nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine.”
(Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged)
I don’t make anything near $250K, but I would never siphon off the fruits of another’s success for my own gain. I have my own means for creating success … I don’t wish to live in the envy of other’s.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Robert said: “hard earned dollars??!!
lololololololol
yeah I’m sure Cindy McCain worked harder then Firefighters and Marines.
screw all the rich snobs and their apologists”
=====
Hey Robert. The reason Cindy McCain’s family has money is because they worked hard, built a business and prospered. This is what living in the United States is about, or supposed to be. Take away the incentive to better your life and you have nothing. You have no one to pay for your welfare check.
I am single and make a decent living and pay 50% of my paycheck for taxes. Give me a break. We already work over half the year just to pay taxes. Have you ever sat down with pen and paper and figured it out? perhaps socialism rings all right for you, but it is a slippery slope and soon, you will be falling over the cliff. Talk to people who have lived in the former USSR or Cuba. They know and they want this country and for as many issues as it has, know this is the GREATEST country in the world.
Take away your freedoms and you are no better than someone living in Iraq, Afghanistan, Bolivia, Peru, or Iran.
Don’t be bamboozled by that shining object. Check your azimuth and conduct your research and vote to preserve your freedoms, which you appear to have taken far too much for granted.
God Bless America and may she always be free!
Posted by: enchanted | October 31, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Good Christ let all this end please.
At the end of the day, irregardless of who wins, it will be up to you to determine where you go and what you get in life.
Posted by: jack | October 31, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
When a child says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a SPOILED BRAT!
When an adult says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a REPUBLICAN!
Posted by: MiHi | October 31, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
How do you know I’m selfish I give to the organizations I want to to help those I know will receive it. The gov will mismanage, mishandle my money. Yes it is my money.. I get up and earn it everyday.
Impressive man but wow I just can not support his policies, sorry.
Posted by: Casper | October 31, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
I live in Boston, was told today that i am racist because i want to keep most of the money i earn and not give it to those who expect a handout and wont work………only a complete moron cant see where obama wants to lead us.
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Hard to believe that America was founded on a tax revolt.
Annie, get your gun… It’s time for a new revolution. ACORN gets my tax money to fund fradulent votes. We gotta stop that.
Posted by: '76 Revolutionary | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
More class envy from The One.
If you REALLY believe that he would stop at $200,000, or $150,000, or whatever number he choses, you need look back no further than Bill Clinton whose promised “middle class tax cuts” became tax increases.
The numbers don’t hold up, folks. Obama cannot pay for his new spending on the backs of those making more than $250K – the math does not work.
It’s probably useless to note since many of the people reading this board have already decided to vote for Obama, but the percentage of income taxes paid by those in the upper brackets have actually increased slightly year by year over the last eight. You wouldn’t know that by listening to the Democrats.
The bottom 50% by income level earn 13% of the overall income and pay 3% of income taxes. The top 1% earn 19% of overall income and pay 37% of income taxes; the top 5% earn 33% of income and pay 57% of income taxes. The lowest 40% pay no income taxes today, so how can they get a ‘tax cut’ except by paying less social security taxes?
Posted by: Bob | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Let me see if I get this correct:
1) People that don’t want higher taxes are selfish (Obama)
2) Paying higher taxes is considered patriotic (Biden)
These two Yahoos should start a late night comedy troupe — they could be the new & improved Marx(ist) Brothers.
Posted by: TeeKay | October 31, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
A vote for Obama is a vote for a lost America, the land of opportunity. How dare he label “selfishness” on Americans. So many people have lost their hard earned investments, retirement funds, 401Ks and if they cash in on what is left, they will be taxed even higher. Taxing Americans on any level during the worst of economic times is wrong. Taxing big business will send more jobs overseas,(tax on corporate America is the highest in the world) taxing small business will cut jobs. Taxing one level of wage earners to spread the wealth around is SOCIALISM. Do you hear Obama say I am doing it for the nurse, the secretary, the school teacher and the waitress-sure he is keeping them all down with no future to advance. Why would they want to if the wealth is being spread around by others?
Posted by: ANA | October 31, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Be careful, Jake. Be very careful. You might get booted off the plane in the final hours and miss the ascension.
Posted by: jcarob | October 31, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
The funniest thing about Obama is that he can say one thing convincingly while meaning the exact opposite. The facts belie Obama’s statements on taxes. He is going to raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class.
Obama has already promised to let the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010. The group that loses the most in this case will be the middle class. Incomes over $25,000 and up to $45,000 will see their marginal tax rates increase from 20% to 40%. Yes, if you make $25,001, that next one dollar of earnings will cost you $0.40 in federal taxes.
The only group which will avoid a substantial increase in marginal tax rates will be those who earn over $125,000. They will continue to be taxed at a 25% marginal tax rate. Coincidentally, Obama falls into this over $125,000 earnings range.
I didn’t make this up. Check out the Oct. 13, 2008 Wall Street Journal, page A18.
Posted by: Patrick C. | October 31, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
LouAnn: “I don’t make anything near $250K, but I would never siphon off the fruits of another’s success for my own gain.”
You already do. We have a progressive tax system. The rich are already contributing more than you do.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Well, perhaps one side will get the nuclear firing codes and the other side will merely be exterminated.
Posted by: '76 Revolutionary | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Selfishness is not GREED.
Wanting something is not yours is GREED.
Posted by: Dennis | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I can’t wait to spend all your money!!!
Seriously, knock off your “sky is falling” notions. Obama wants to take us back to the SURPLUS of the Clinton years. I DON’T FEEL SORRY FOR YOU!!!
Posted by: mine | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
And if you can’t make enough money on your own, you get sweatheart deals from Rezco to buy your house at reduced rates and get extra property.
Posted by: steve o | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Okay. If this jerk wants to spread his OWN wealth around, I say go for it, Barack. But I am SO done with him thinking that he has any right to tell people how much of their own money they’re entitled to. It’s arrogant and yes, it IS socialist. Sorry, Barry.
I’m as far from rich as I can be. But I hope that’ll change one day and I don’t want Barack Obama to step in on the achievement of my dream and tell me I’m not entitled to it or didn’t deserve it. Up yours, Barack. Spread your own damn wealth around. I’ve already cast my vote for John McCain; HE understands the principles that this great country was founded upon.
Posted by: Pat | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Because YOU didn’t earn it Pablo, someone else did.
Posted by: Ryan | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
How about this, MiHi :
When a child or an adult sticks out their hand and demands something for free, they are both greedy and lazy.
Stand proud.
Posted by: Dale G | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
IMPEACH obama……….just practicing!!!!
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Here’s commentary from the Oct. 14 British Spectator that is an eloquent synopsis: “You have to pinch yourself — Barack Obama, a Marxist radical who all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshiped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters, is on the verge of becoming President of the United States. And apparently it’s considered impolite to say so.”
Let’s pray that the majority of Americans are not beguiled by this novice circus comic who is a slick talker when anchored to a teleprompter with a speech prepared by his ubiquitous handlers. Greg Neubeck
Posted by: Greg Neubeck | October 31, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
All this Obama disgusting explanation of who, what, why, when – Senator Obama ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ ARE CAPABLE OF FIGURING THINGS OUT FOR OURSELVES.
Most of us – most Americans are sick and tired of hearing Rev Wright’s, Fr. Phelger’s and Louis Farrakhan’s words coming out of Barack Obama’s mouth and aimed at us – all of us.
AMERICA WAKE UP!!! AMERICA WAKE UP!!!
Gentle Citizens in Swing or Battleground States – whatever – please LET’S SHUT UP THE YAPPING FROM THIS SOCIALISTIC, DANGEROUS AND UNBELIEVABLY UN-AMERICAN CANDIDATE.
Only you fellow Americans can do it – only those of you living in Florida, Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Nevada, – ONLY YOU CAN STOP THIS INSANITY.
Vote American -Vote McCain/Palin 2008!!!
Posted by: RAltiere | October 31, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
It is always class warfare with Democrats. They throw the words “rich” and “hardworking” around so easily. As I have said before we own a small business and work long hours, long days, and little to no vacation, but you see we don’t want you to feel sorry for us. Just understand that it is no more our responsibility to fund the government than it is yours. Those with a larger salary will automatically pay more taxes anyway, but all American’s should contribute to our defense, roads, etc., as you benefit, also. We should have a flat tax to be fair and then all American’s would be equally patriotic.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 31, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Race has absolutely nothing to do with this race. I acknowledge that there is probably a small population of rednecks that wouldn’t vote for Obama because of his skin color, but I bet there are a proportionate number of blacks that would do the same with McCain. But we’re talking a small minority here. What most people oppose with Obama are 1. His startling lack of experience and 2. His socialistic policies. Not everyone is going to be a success, not everyone is going to make a lot of money. There is no Utopia. In every society there will be a high class, middle class and lower class. That’s just how it is. Attacking the higher class to give to the middle and lower class is a great short term solution, but will end up hurting the middle and lower class in the long run.
Posted by: KJL | October 31, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Here is a thought, does the government exactly have a good track record for being an efficient means of taking care of people? Katrina fraud, Fannie Mae debacle, state of California in general (I recall they almost got their lights shut off), big dig … and the list goes on and on.
While some of you would point to Bush as being in charge of some of those you would have a very narrow view of how the government actually works and how 9 out of 10 government employees (the people that actually execute the policy)are career entrenched people who basically can’t be fired and have about as much a stake in being competent as a registered republican in DC does of getting his candidate elected.
This class warfare stuff is nonsense. It is the government pitting the rich against the poor when they are the ones that are taking everybody’s money and doing a fabulously awful job with it.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Hey DB -
Check your facts. McCain has NOT offered tax breaks to “only the rich” as you put it. He’s offering tax breaks to EVERYBODY!! Why don’t left-wing loons like you get that?? Do you think Bush’s tax cuts were only given to people who make more than $250k a year? WRONG! EVERYONE got a tax break! Even you! And do you know what Obama plans to do with those Bush tax cuts that were given to everyone? Eliminate them. So go ahead and elect Obama. Once he eliminates the Bush tax cuts, your taxes will go up, along with everyone else’s. Did you ever think about it that way? So while you may not be lazy, you certainly aren’t very observant.
Posted by: CC | October 31, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Sharing is when you VOLUNTARILY give some of your money to someone else.
Having someone forcibly take it from you to give to others is socialism.
And nobody shares better than Republicans. Studies show that per capita, Republicans donate way more to charity than lazy, selfish Democrats.
Posted by: BuffaloRick | October 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Pass the FairTax bill, and participate in the greates economic boom in history.
Posted by: Stephen Woodworth | October 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Obama shouldn’t talk about “selfish” hard working people he plans to take wealth from to give to lazy ass so and so. His running mate Joe Biden is the epitomy of selfish–look at his record of charitable donations over the past 10 years…averaging $365 per year—NICE. Libs always want to spend other people’s $ not their own!
Posted by: Karenhcw | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Note To Florence Scott… You still must take responsibility for handing over our nation to a radical leftist with radical leftists heading up both the House & the Senate. Do you think you can wash your hands of the whole issue by claiming ignorance and just voting for change when all signs point towards socialism and totalitarianism? Did you know that Obama is proposing a national police force? Do you know what they call that?
Does “Gestapo’ mean anything to you? How about Storm Troopers?! Wake up and smell the coffee. You will be held responsible for your own choices as will we all, by our consciences once Obama’s new leftist regime begins to show itself for what it is. Make your choice wisely and using common sense and wisdom so you can live with the consequences.
Posted by: Larry Grizzle | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
the comments about how many jobs the middle class and poor are right on, NONE
raising taxes kills jobs period also for you youngsters, check out jimmy carter obama will be worse trust me i lived through the carter admin. misery index anybody. please think and research before you vote
Posted by: steve | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
The debate on whether selfishness is a virtue or vice is never unending – especially between the sons and daughters of Liberty and the motley crew that constitute the Collectivists who are always ever-so-generous with OPM. One thing that is not debatable is that envy is one of the seven deadly sins (two can play the “Let’s quote the Bible out of context” game Barry), and envy is EXACTLY what 0bama and his pack of Thugocrats have been pushing since “The One” threw his hat in the ring back in ’07.
Posted by: Mario | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Pretty ironic how, despite how successful Obama has been in his career, he has so many family members living in poverty. Maybe he should set an example and start spreading his own wealth around.
I’m already sick of this lying hypocrite. He eats lobster and caviar for a snack while his aunt resides in a government slum. Does no one see the hypocrisy?!
Posted by: JusticeForAll | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I feel so selfish – I want keep my own money for myself and my family. I am so horrible, I’m ashamed.
Posted by: K. West | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
When the “rich” are overly taxed and when $250k is considered rich…or is it $150k now, it will only be the super rich who do not feel the pain. The super rich who could pay 75% income taxes and it still would not bother them have nothing to lose and only power to gain. This hyper progressive tax system will only deepen the divide between the true rich and everyone else. If you think this is anything but a power play by the elites in government to increase their power and lower our resistance you mistaken and above all ignorant. Vote Obama if you want to see the true rich get richer and everyone else get poorer.
Posted by: patrick | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Marxist!
Posted by: A. Lendel | October 31, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I trust millionaires Barack and Michelle won’t be voluntarily handing over their riches to the treasury, until they have only a few measly hundred thousand to their name. If you or I try to earn and keep more, we’re selfish and unpatriotic (per Biden) for not surrendering our pay to Obama to spend for us. Him keeping and growing his massive personal wealth? That’s different.
Anytime a wealthy limosine liberal says taxes need to be higher, ask them to give their money to the treasury until they have the same wealth as you, first. See how quickly they refuse to live within your means, while saying you have too much. But by being annointed leftists who have seen the light, they expect exemption from the standards they insist you live by.
Posted by: Daniel | October 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The kind of selfishness that Ayn Rand advocated (and which Obama apparently opposes) is a completely noble and moral American virtue. This country was founded on the principle that men and women had the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” free from government interference and tyranny.
Many immigrants (such as my parents) came to this country precisely to be able to work hard, prosper, and give their children a chance for a better life. They came to this country with little more than the clothes on their back, but did well over the years, sent two children to college and medical school, and are now enjoying a well-earned and comfortable retirement. Their life has been a real-life embodiment of the American dream.
If we want America to remain a beacon of hope to millions around the world, we should re-affirm our commitment to free markets and capitalism, and reject calls for more socialism and “redistribution of wealth”.
This country is great precisely because it allows people like my parents to attain selfish goals such as their life and happiness. Americans should be proud of that fact, not condemn it.
Posted by: Paul Hsieh | October 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Forget your pursuit of happiness if it gets in the way of what Barack Hussein Obama can envision. The healine should say “Obama reaffirms elitism”
Posted by: Karl Marx | October 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Um, wasn’t the prosperity of the 1990s caused by inflated stock prices, accounting fraud and failed government policies that allowed people who cannot afford homes to buy them? Happy days are here again!
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Obama needs to practice what he preaches. He’s a multi-millionaire, as is his wife. Surely he doesn’t need all that money that he has. Is he out there giving away his wealth to the unfortunate? NO! He won’t even take care of his aunt who lives in a Boston slum. What makes anyone think that he cares about the average Joe? Actions speak louder than words, Mr. Obama.
Posted by: WV conservative | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
MiHi:
“When a child says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a SPOILED BRAT!
When an adult says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a REPUBLICAN!”
====
I gave more to charities last year than obama did and he made 4 million, and I make 5 figures. it is all right to portion out the money as long as it isn’t his money.
I read though from people like you that this is a good idea HOWEVER if they take your money, from your personal paycheck, that is a different matter.
Try an experiment when you go into a restaurant. Tell the server you decided they made enough money and that you are going to give their tip to a homeless person, or to the church (or whoever). Tell them you are doing what obama wants to do and sharing the wealth, redistributing the wealth – the report back as to what the server said.
yeah a lot of people are on the band wagon as long as it doesn’t get into their pocket
Posted by: enchanted | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
To Pablo, who said:
“why does everyone seem to think the money is going to be taken from the “hard workers” and given to the “lazy people”?
I work my #$% off every day! I work all day, many nights, weekends, and I have a college degree. Guess what? I still don’t make that much money, and there is a freeze on raises where I work and I won’t see much in the near future.
Why should the rich get tax breaks? How about the people that actually need it? So many people want their truck and their boat. Well, maybe now they will have to just get a car and a boat so I can pay my bills and go groshery shopping in the same month. I am looking for a better job. I am a reporter –freshly married and out of college. No one gets rich in this business. My grandpa was laid off with six kids in his day. He fought his way back with a gas station business, but he damn sure didn’t want any Republicans in office.
Reagan’s policies are biting us in the $#%. Time for something new. A tax break for the rich is a Republican policy…and now all of a sudden a tax break for me is socialism.
VOTE OBAMA. For the real hard-working people that make America run and don’t get paid like executives.”
I am glad that you had the chance to go to college and that you work hard. But your view is all screwed up. You made your choice to be a reporter. You make your choice in your career. What if you had to chosen to go into partnership with this dorky loooking guy named William Gates back in the early 80′s? You would have been a billionaire now. Should you then be penalized for having been financially succesful? The top 10% of this country already bears 70% (yes 70%) of the tax burden. McCain’s tax policies are not designed to only help the rich. He is providing a tax cut to EVERYONE. He is not discriminating against the rich or the poor. Obviously, if you make $1,000 a year, and someone else makes $500, a 10% tax cut is going to yield a $100 savings for you, and $50 for the other person. Does this mean that tax cut favors you, becausae you saved $100 vs. $50? No. It was an across the board cut.
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
The philosophy behind “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” has been tried already. When the Soviet Union attempted to implement these principles they were eventually abandoned because it was quickly discovered that they were productivity killers. The income redistribution experiment has already been conducted and it failed miserably. It just does not work folks.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is not only the most over quoted Marxian standard it is the most misunderstood and misapplied.
Marx uses the phrase in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program. Specifically, Marx states;
“In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life’s prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly — only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!”
Doesn’t anyone get what Marx is saying here. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” only comes after the achievement of the utopian dream of the pure and perfect communist society is achieved. Its all a pipe dream. Look at the conditions which were in place when Marx did all of his writings. It was the very beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Conditions for most workers were horrible. Think Third World horrible and multiply this by ten. Marx was writing in reaction to the conditions on the ground as anything. No wonder everyone yearned for this workers utopia. What did you have to live for in your real world.
Anyone who thinks similar conditions exist today in the U.S. is certifiably crazy. Equality does not equal equity. One should get out what one puts in.
Obama claims he studied Marx (or maybe he just hung with the Marxists). Either he just does not understand what Marx is really saying or he has figured a way to sell it for his personal goals.
Posted by: CK | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
how much of his campaign money is Obama willing to share with McCain?
Posted by: v | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
State confiscation of personal property in order to give it to others is not charity – it’s theft. It is completely devoid of any charitable intent. Obama is a socialist. Wake up Americans!
Posted by: Jack Hammer | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“I am not going to start pestering him, I don’t want to look to him for help, I want to achieve things for myself.”
Give it up already. Barack Obama is under no obligation to provide for his half-brother, especially when his half-brother doesn’t need or want it!
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Prez Bush’s 2001 Tax cut expires in 2010 and if Obama becomes Prez all of our taxes will be raised no matter what you make…Second of all our country depends on the investments of the rich…take more of their money and they will take what they have left and invest off shore (which most have started doing in worry)…with Obama as prez get ready for another great depression.
Posted by: Melissa | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Last tax period, I gave more money to charity than did Mr. & Mrs. Obama, and I make much less. I want to choose who best benefits from my money. I definitely do not want my tax dollars rerouted to groups like ACORN.
Selfish I guess.
Posted by: SJW | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Either way you’re going to get taxed. Obama will do it out in the open and McCain will push his agenda via inflation, which eventually “taxes” you. With all these promises of reduced taxes for 95% and tax credits for healthcare, it leaves me wonder how big the budget deficit will be next year. After all, neither is talking about a reduction in size of federal government.
Posted by: Crazy | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
“SURPLUS of the Clinton years”
Bill Clinton is slightly left of center. Obama is an extreme leftist as measured by affiliation and voting record. In additon, Obama has no discernable record of accomplishment by which to gauge his governing philosophy. Only a blind hamster would conclude that because the two stood side by side for an hour or so, the Clinton philosophy of governing is shared by Obama. What is wrong with you people?
Posted by: jcarob | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
No one becomes wealthy without the aid of others who contribute but are not rewarded proportionately. When you get rich after you’ve gone to public schools, had your national borders protected by a paid army, traveled on public roads, had your food and drugs protected by health inspectors, had your home and person protected by the police and a judicial system, had your money protected by the FDIC and SEC, then the money you make isn’t all yours. You owe society big time. No one who has any sense and honesty believes in the rugged individualist myth.
Posted by: Edward Morris | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I call taking what isn’t your’s “stealing.” I believe people who want what they haven’t earned as selfishness. If people chose to give as a gift that’s one thing, but people that think they are entitled to what others have earned is “selfish.” I believe our government should help those that cannot help themselves (elderly and disabled). I don’t get this belief of entitlement instead of accomplishment. I think they are all loons. These people who believe this cr–, don’t get it. The powers of the far left don’t care about them, it’s all power. By keeping people dependent on them, they can keep the power. Most Conservatives and Libertarians at the top want us to be free to flourish and be all that we can or want to be. Conservatives don’t want what isn’t there’s and WILL SHARE with those that cannot do for themselve.
Posted by: Karen Emert | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I can’t believe that this moron thinks we are selfish. The American people are the most giving in the world. Not wanting to give the government money to dole out to worthless pork spending is not selfish it is smart. If I had paid more taxes perhaps I would not have been able to send my three kids to college, perhaps I would not have been able to donate to worthy charities, perhaps I would not have been able to help family memebers in need. If Obama wasn’t so selfish he would not be spending millions of dollars for his so called Victory celebration. He would not have spent millions of dollars for his speech at the DNC convention. Perhaps if he was not selfish he would have taken much more of his money to donate to charity, not the small amount he did. Just think how the millions of dollars he has spent to buy an election could have done to help all the poor people that he claims to care about.
Posted by: dean | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I am always impressed by people who follow the path that that actions speak louder than words.
With Obama, though, it is the opposite. His words speak louder than his actions. His relatives, including half brothers live in penury around the globe.
Kenya half brother $12 a year
English Muslim half brother. Unemployed
Aunt in Boston: destitute lives in assisted housing
Grandmother Kenya: lives in a mud hut.
If that is being your brother’s keeper I want none of it.
Posted by: EllenO | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Selfish? How dare he? I would be curious to know how much of his own money Mr. Obama gives to charity each year. America is the most compassionate, charitable country in the world. And the charitible donations that I CHOOSE to donate to, do a hell of a lot better job of spending their money wisely than the Federal Government. The federal government must stop spending OUR money. I am very, very scared of this man.
Posted by: Dianne | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
obama is a liar!
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
mike, if you LOVE Swiss’ socialism so much then WHY ARE YOU HERE!!!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Funny how the stock market goes down when it’s reported that Obama’s lead goes up and the market goes up when Obama’s lead starts to go down. An interesting correlation.
I just wonder if Obama wins, how low will the stock market go? Could it set off the next great depression? I’ve heard of the Dolphins owner trying to sell his team before Obama gets into office to avoid the capital gains tax he’s going to impose.
If Obama is so good for the economy, why do all the leading indicators show the country will go down the tubes if he’s elected? All of Obama’s supporters say he’ll be great for the country and the economy, but if the stock market is any indication, then I think just the opposite will occur. It looks like Obama will be bad for the economy. What say you?
Posted by: The Oracle | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
To all you charity advocates. You are not required to pay your tax burden…you can actually pay more if you would like, there is a place on your IRS form for you to pay MORE THAN YOUR TAX BURDEN. I ask all those who vote for Obama, in the spirit of charity, to pay an extra 10% of you taxes this year. Maybe then we selfish people can take a vacation over the next 4 years.
Posted by: patrick | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
What liberals don’t understand is that you help Americans by getting and keeping the government out of their way.
Not, the government handing them checks. That just leads to dependence and weakness.
Posted by: Dood | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
I don’t get it. Rather than responding to critics, he just affirmed their cry of socialism. “Give people more money” and they spend it on a new car? This doesn’t create wealth. It only transfers it, and at huge social cost.
I concur: Marxist.
Posted by: Swift | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
As a US Senator, Obama spent most of his time in office campaigning for President. Obama’ main experience is as a community organizer, another word for organizing low income people The last thing these people need is someone keeping them down. They need opportunity, not someone else’s paycheck. Obama will stifle many with his dictarship.
Posted by: ANA | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
It appears most people who are commenting would never have been part of the coordinated effort we had in the middle of the 20th century when people had to sacrifice. People consumed less, people did without much butter or milk and instead had colored lard instead of butter. women drew lines up the backs of their calves because pantyhoes were scarce. What would people give today?
When the economy is failing, apparently nothing. All people want to do is whine about how they will be inconvenienced. This is the greed that is out there.
Posted by: Brian | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
The fundamental thing that the Democrats don’t understand…or maybe they do and are just evil is that if you tax something you get less of it. If I work hard and get to keep my money I will want to work hard. If I work hard but don’t get to keep my money I won’t work as hard. Companies will lay off workers rather than become non profits. Higher taxes sinks all boats. Remember the luxury tax. People stopped buying big ticket items. It was the boat builders who almost went out of buiness.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I make around $65K and I consider myself middle income. It’s hard sometimes to stretch the dollar, but… no way should I get a refund of money someone else paid in taxes! That’s just wrong. The truth is I’ll do better when I learn to live within my means and I’ll feel better about myself for it – never too late.
Posted by: Carl | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
His Aunt lives in a Boston slum, his brother lives in a box in Africa while Obama is a multi millionaire. What is holding him back?
Posted by: tr88 | October 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
He was caught saying they cling to guns and religion out of fear. Then Joe the Plumber caught him saying spread the wealth. Now he is saying anyone who does not want to pay higher taxes is selfish. Biden said paying higher taxes is patriotic. Obama thinks wanting to keep your own hard earned paycheck is making a virtue out of selfishness..because you are clinging to your own paycheck, along with the guns and religion. So spread the wealth to those he decides should go shopping on your money. Socialist.
Posted by: Blinky | October 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
I’m one who gave more to charity than Joe Biden and, of course, I make a lot less money than he does. Because Biden and Barak are calling me selfish, I decided that I will no longer give anything to any charities. They are calling me right and left and I tell them that if they can get Joe Biden to give then I will give. I also tell them not to worry because the government will soon take care of everything with tax dollars. Of course, letting the government administer money is like throwing it into a black hole. Barak also wants to give a percentage of GDP to the UN – another black hole. I hope working people survive Barak’s presidency if he wins.
Posted by: Patricia | October 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
All politicians would do well to remember that taxes are collected at the point of a gun. It isn’t selfish to object to having what is yours coercively removed, and it isn’t generous for a politician to try and improve the world with other people’s money.
Posted by: brennan | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I’m not selfish, I’m scared. I’m still clinging to my guns and religion and I plan on clinging to my money too!
Posted by: The Oracle | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Now “The ONE” calls being against higher taxes and wanting to keep more of what you earn , selfishness!!! I don’t think someone who gave less than 1% of his income to charity over the last decade (except in years he was running for office) and who’s running mate gave less than 0.25% of his income to charity should be lecturing anyone about selfishness.
I’m from western PA so now according to the Dems (Obama and Murtha), I am now a selfish bitter red necked racist who clings to my religion, guns, in fear of those that are different from me. What an enticement to vote Dem this year!
Posted by: Doug | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Socialism doesn’t create wealth and prosperity – it consumes it.
America needs to have a final debate on this topic and maybe Obama has provided the platform.
Do Americans want a socialist state or a capitalist state? Socialist states eventually fail – pick up any history book. If that’s what Americans choose then so be it, but please call Obama’s economic policy what it is… Socialism.
Posted by: hippylover | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Where does one draw the line between desire for prosperity and selfishness?
Posted by: Val | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I make over 250K a year so let me explain how this works. If my taxes go up, I fire my gardener. If they go up again, I fire my housekeeper. If they go up some more, I wash my own car and someone at the car wash loses a job.
Posted by: Randy | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
MiHi wrote: “When a child says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a SPOILED BRAT!
When an adult says “I DON’T WANT TO SHARE AND YOU CAN’T MAKE ME!”, they’re a REPUBLICAN!”
The definition of a liberal is someone who is generous with OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY.
Posted by: Bill | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
What many people fail to realize is that the mess we are in now was created quite some time ago, by the DEMOCRATS and a DEMOCRATIC President. The was a law enacted in the 90s (before Bush) that made it MANDATORY for financial institutions to back sub-prime loans so that the less fortunate and less credit-deserving could buy houses. That is what created the housing boom and made many greedy people rich and left many other hanging in the breeze. We don’t need any more of these socialist policies. Remember what this country stands for? Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, not Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of welfare! If people earn it, they should be able to keep it! Everyone should pay the same percentage rate on their income, regardless of their gross! That is what capitolism is all about. Life isn’t meant to be fair. You want something, go out and earn it. If you have to work a loiilte harder, so be it! Success all comes down to how bad you want it, it shouldn’t be how bad someone wants to give it to you. There is nothing in our laws that indicate that the government or the people living here have to support you.
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
So, Obama is “pushing back” against McCain’s critique of Obama’s tax plan by accusing people who wish to keep their own earnings “Selfish”. Really? How about Obama spreading his wealth around? There is nothing stoppong him or that cheapskate running mate of his, Joe Biden,from donating their earnings to the less fortunate. The IRS Code has a specific provision that allows any taxpayer to make a payment larger than what is owed. Have these two knuckleheads done that? No. Obama bought a $2 million dollar home and Biden lives in a $3 million dollar home. Why don’t they set the example? Why doesen’t Obama take his book earnings and distribute them to his constituents or his aunt who lives in the Boston projects? Such absolute hypocrites. You see the dirty little secret is that all of these Democrat politicians do have their own “business”- its the federal,state and local governments. That is where they make their money- by taking it from their fellow citizens and blowing it on programs that do not help anyone but government bureacrats and the politicians themselves. You think Obama is going to reform anything? Not a chance- that is why the trial lawyers love him so much- it will be open season on business and when the business sector decides that the US is not worth the effort, you better hope that Obama and Biden have replacement jobs for all of you that are voting for this clown who has the experience of a nat.
Posted by: Michael | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
It’s alright. No need for us hardworking people to sweat it. Even if our (God forbid) newly elected Socailist/Marxist president “spreads” the wealth around, it will only take a very short time for it to go right back into the pockets from which it came.
For now, buy stock in Best Buy, Target, and Circuit City because that is where all of the “dole-out” money will go.
“A giant flat screen TV in every living-room” should be Obama’s slogan. That’s all it will be.
I doubt many of those he wants to give our money to will suddenly become industrialists and entrepreneurs.
Posted by: mrhcaphill | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
It is obvious that this person has never read Atlas Shrugged or any other Ayn Rand novel from the last statement in his article (“Atlas may not be shrugging, but Obama is.”)
What IS clear, however, is that if this country chooses to elect B. Obama that we will clearly be heading down the same path as Ayn Rand described in Atlas Shrugged.
The phrase Atlas Shrugged describes the situation when those who are rich, are CEOs, are corporate presidents, and who are inventing new technologies finally give in and tell those in the socialist government to go ahead and take over. Then when the government wrecks everything and finally admits that they are unable to do without those they demonized as being selfish, the CEOs, etc. will return to start a new era built on the principles of CAPITALISM.
Clearly this correspondent is a WRITER in every sense of the word, because he clearly cannot be a JOURNALIST since he does not do any research to get the facts correct.
Go take a few more classes at your local community college and brush up on your liberal arts classes.
Posted by: John Galt | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
To MiHi
I am a Dem & voted Obama, but I cant let your remark stand as it is STUPID
When my children would not share we went through this and their response would be you dont always share!
The answer is not that I am a republican, the answer is that I EARNED the MONEY to buy IT!
Posted by: george webber | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
My parents came from a socialist economy and sacrificed a lot so that me and my brother can have a chance at the American Dream. There is no way that I will let everything they have worked for and sacrificed to be in vain and have this amazing country turn into a socialist one because of Obama’s ideology. McCain/Palin 08!!!!
Posted by: Jenna | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Posted by: evanz | Oct 31, 2008 3:03:08 PM:”The claim that rich people will fire employees due to a tax hike is ridiculous on the face of it. We are talking about personal income taxes, folks. If I’m a CEO of a Fortune 500 – tell me exactly why I start firing people because my income goes down? It seems nonsensical – and is obviously subterfuge. The top marginal tax rate will be raised to the level it was during the 90′s – which if we all remember was good times.”
Answers
The 90′s were “good times” due to the internet/dotcom boom which was the single greatest creation of wealth in history, and had nothing to do with Mr. Clinton.
And layoffs will occurr ad infinitem, and you know why. Ask yourselves, will a CEO do more to maintain his annual salary, or yours?
To maintain his, he’ll layoff experienced, higher paid workers, and higher less experienced/lower paid workers. They’ll cut less profitable portions of the company, such as security, customer service, etc. They will outsource much more abroad, to avoid higher Payroll Taxes and Mandatory Healthcare costs in the US.
I say this as I have already begun to cut back and have already obtained a dozen unemployment packets. This Wednesday will be a big day for at least 12 people.
Posted by: Tom Genin | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Does anyone here realize that not one dime of “income tax” pays for anything local? That not one dime is “redistributed” to “the people”…
Posted by: federalReserve | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
My parents came from a socialist economy and sacrificed a lot so that me and my brother can have a chance at the American Dream. There is no way that I will let everything they have worked for and sacrificed to be in vain and have this amazing country turn into a socialist one because of Obama’s ideology. McCain/Palin 08!!!!
Posted by: Jenna | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
His Aunt lives in a Boston slum, his brother lives in a box in Africa while Obama is a multi millionaire. What is holding him back?
Good question TR88! Now Tappy tell me do you DARE to ask the Messiah this question or are you too afraid of getting thrown out of his aeroplane? :-)
Posted by: Frederik | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
…In a higher phase of communist society… only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be fully left behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs……..
….For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him……
…The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion. ….
…The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism………
…The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property……..
….The production of too many useful things results in too many useless people……
…..History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce……..
Posted by: KARL MARX | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Give me a break. America’s current wealth disparity is at the same level it was in the 1920′s. The whole Republican tax cutting strategy is designed to keep their rich donors riche and the rest of us relatively poor. In terms of wealth, only 20% of americans control 84% of our nations wealth, and the richest 1% of Americans control over 34% of all America’s wealth. None of these economic elite people would have been able to amass their wealth without the infrastructure, safety, securtiy, and hard work of the rest of 80% who only control 16% of our countries wealth. So seriously, I can’t see why its unreasonable for people making over $250,000 a year to pay a tax rate comprable to the tax rate they paid in 1996.
Posted by: Patrick | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Here’s an experiment my friend tried at the spur of the moment: He was walking down the street on his way to a local restaurant for lunch. On his way he saw a homeless man holding an “Obama” sign and asking people for money for something to eat. He got to the restaurant and sat down. His waiter walked up wearing an “Obama ’08″ tie and took his order. He ate his lunch and when the waiter brought the check he paid for his lunch. He then proceeded to let the waiter know that he was not going to tip him and that he was going to, instead, give his tip to someone who “needed” it more. The waiter walked off in a huff. Then, my friend walked back to the homeless man and gave him a ten dollar bill and asked him to walk into the restaurant and thank the waiter wearing the “Obama ’08″ tie for the ten dollars that he worked for. My friend walked away, but noticed that the man, instead, walked across the street to the liquor store. Thats very telling, folks!
Posted by: Roger | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Aengil, no, Barack is under no obligation to help his relatives, it just shows how selfish he is because he doesn’t. His charitable giving to others is a travesty and he has the balls to call the rest of us stingy or selfish?! I think he needs to just crawl back under the rock he crawled out from under. I’m already tired of his moralizing when he has no moral authority to do so. But, you know, most totalitarian wanna be’s demand of others that which they are unwilling to give themselves.
Posted by: Larry Grizzle | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Selfish? I’d have to google it, but doesn’t that sound similar to what Hugo Chavez said about the owners of land and companies before he took them over?
Posted by: teccec | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Obama has family living in poverty and Biden has given what, a few hundred to charity? And they want to use the word “selfish”.
Liberals, particularly limosine liberals are the most selfish people on earth. The think the definition of sharing is using the force of law, the consequence of incarceraton to punder you of your wealth in order to send it to their constituents.
Posted by: danno | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
To Brent Mack, who said:
“Jeezus Charist!
I’ve never seen such SELFISH people in all my life. We’re talking about tinkering with a couple of percentage points in the tax code. What in the h@ll is wrong with you people?
These adjustments are made all of the time. But I never heard any whining when we were making adjustments to benefit those who already have plenty.
So you ought to just be quiet and quit making complete fools out of yourselves.
Your economically-retarded, SELFISH desires have already been discounted in the marketplace of ideas. And to believe otherwise is just an exercise in self-delusion.
I actually feel sorry for you people. But most of you will eventually regain your senses and come to see how ridiculous you look.”
It’s one thing to say that the Federal Government needs more money, so we are going to raise taxes on everyone. It’s another thing to say, we are going to raise taxes for some, and cut it for another. And then, it’s another thing to say that we are going to raise it for some, and then take that money and give it to others who don’t even pay tax to begin with. Even President Clinton wasn’t issuing checks to people who don’t pay taxes every year.
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
I am selfish because I worked hard, studied hard, sacrificed, worked harder, didn’t do stupid and illegal things and now I am earning a nice wage and Obama wants to call me selfish and take it away from me in higher taxes and give to someone who won’t do the hard work and sacrifice I did?
Read the writing on the wall all you thinking of voting for Obama – you will be taxed much, much more and you will have more big government in your lives.
Posted by: Will Stanton | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
If you had any doubts about Obama’s socialistic views…Obama just confirmed what everyone suspected..he is a Socialist!!!
Posted by: Donna | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Obama doesn’t seem to take care of his own relatives, where’s his grandma, aunt, brother, they seem to left for the kindness of strangers…he has the strangest of friends and values.
Posted by: Ron | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Obama wants to spend our money, but won’t give a dime of his own. He wants us to help fellow man and lend your brother a helping hand, but like most liberals, they never do what they preach. Obama has a brother in Kenya living in a grass hut who earns something like $1 a week or month. Where is Obama’s benevolence to his own flesh and blood brother? Good example-setting Obama. Good leade4rship. You really demonstrate how to live. You, Obama, are the selfish one. Likewise, he has an aunt living in the slums somewhere in the NE U.S. Why doesn’t he help her? He wants us to do it I guess. I have always learned that when people criticize others, like Obama calling those who don’t want to pay higher taxes to fund Obama’s reparations and socialistic agenda, they are usually saying more about their own selves than the ones they criticize.
Posted by: Brian | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Hey Pablo;
You yourself say “nobody gets rich” in the profession you’ve chosen all while complaining you don’t have enough money. It’s called “living with your decsions”. Why should we have to pay higher taxes because you made a poor decision. Typical dem…blame somebody else for your mistake.
Posted by: BK | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
After the Emancipation Proclamation, and Civil Rights, this is the gratitude that he gives back – Barack Obama wants to enslave the Amercan working class taxpayer, and those that resist are labeled “selfish”.
Reject Barack Obama.
Posted by: One_American | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Reply to The Oracle on the stock market:
If Obama wins, expect a lot of sell-off. He’s clearly going to double cap gains (he said this is a debate with Clinton, even after Charlie Gibson told him that data shows when you drop the cap gains, you increase revs).
Any boomer voting for Obama will have buyer’s remorse when they see their retirement investments shrink under burdensome taxes.
All the asinine, way-out protesters now outside Pennsylvania Ave will have to make room for the marching masses of average Joe protesters shrieking out against their socialist govt.
If that’s what it takes, so be it. Like my neighbor said when I told him that the Dems are planning to absorb our 401(k)s: “I’m keeping my powder dry.”
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
If Obama wants real change, he can find out how selfish the American people are by giving everyone dollar for dollar tax credits for charitable contributions, and then we will see. Then we will see how much the role of government will “change” when we with generosity help the least of society without government’s “help”.
Posted by: Curtis Elliott | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
It’s YOUR money–and I want it NOW!
It’s YOUR money–and I want it NOW!
It’s YOUR money–and I want it NOW!
It’s YOUR money–and I want it NOW!
Posted by: Boucheau | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
From Patrick: To all you charity advocates. You are not required to pay your tax burden…you can actually pay more if you would like, there is a place on your IRS form for you to pay MORE THAN YOUR TAX BURDEN. I ask all those who vote for Obama, in the spirit of charity, to pay an extra 10% of you taxes this year. Maybe then we selfish people can take a vacation over the next 4 years.
Patrick, that’s an excellent point, but allow me to take it a step further. How many of you Obama supporters out there received a tax refund earlier this year? Or a stimulus check this past spring? If you’re really supportative of Obama’s plans, why don’t you all just do the right thing and return those checks, refunds, etc. to the IRS? Put your words to actions.
Posted by: WV conservative | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
ARRRGGGGHHHHH! Obama makes me so sick! Its socialist policies that our country has already that’s keeping me trapped in the middle class!
Capitalism is unequal distribution of blessings.
Socialism is equal distribution of misery.
And its not that I’m selfish! I give 12% or more of my money away to charity. The key is: I give it away, it is not confiscated!
Posted by: Regular Guy | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Selfish is right. Except he is speaking of himself and those who support his policies. I admire and respect people who use their own money and resources to help the needy. I have little to no respect for those who take from others to make themselves appear compassionate.
Posted by: Curt | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
This philosophy of Obama’s is pure Marxism and we know from history that Marxism just does not work! Calling any attempt to get ahead and keep more of what we earn for ourselves and our family “selfishness” is a lame attempt to excuse the coming tyranny by the “Party.” Ask anyone that has lived under this type of suppression. Next they will burn the books and send anyone with any ability to their version of Siberia or worse.
Posted by: hrdguera | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
BO keeps talking about redistributing everybody’s money. He also says he wants all of us to be rich. I am sure everybody reading this wants to be rich. I applaud you. But with his tax plan, then you will be giving your money to a socialist. Why would you want to give your money to someone who is waiting for a handout.
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
No one likes taxes but we have to have someone pay taxes – or do we just keep running up debt until we sink from it?
If you want to cut spending – the vast majority of the money is spent in four places:
Dept of Defense
Health and Human Services
Social Security
Paying Interest on the Debt
So – we have to pay interest on the debt so that leaves three places to start cutting – we can cut in other places but nothing else consumes enough money to make any real difference so where do we cut?
Do we cut Defense spending?
Do we cut Social Security for the old folks?
Do we cut Medicare for the old folks?
Posted by: Rob | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
For those of your quoting the ’10% of American’s pay 70% of the taxes’ please be aware that these 10% make 90% of the money. (that’s what makes them in the top 10%)
So why are they only paying 70% of the taxes when they make 90% of the money??
Sounds selfish to me.
Posted by: lynn | October 31, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
To Boucheau, did you see my post?
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I wish there was a poll to show what percent of income the so-called selfish Republicans give to charity in comparison to dems. Let me go first. $100 a week to church, $50 a month to listener supported Christian radio, $57 monthly to compassion international organization and family values organization, and $25-50 monthly to random charitable causes – NOT SELFISH and not wanting to participate as receiver or giver of “spreading the wealth around”.
Posted by: Carl | October 31, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
What Obama needs to do is:
1. Shut up.
2. Send some of his millions, which he is selfishly keeping, to his brother in Africa.
3. Send some money to his aunt in Massachussets who is also poor.
Or is he just *selfish*?
Posted by: timbrown | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Response to “I Baja”:
It is also corporate taxes that are going up and 80% of the employed work for small businesses – so when their expenses go up they cut back on the number of employees. Sweden has LOWER corp. taxes than the US and they did that to get their economy going. Related to Personal Tax increases (Now the number is around $120,000, not $250,000, $200,000, $150,000 – I am waiting for next lower number) – service people normally hired will NOT be, e.g., interior decorators will be hired less because of less discretionary $$ – forced to close because of lack of clients, they end up unemployed. AND, if BHO will not even take care of his own family members – what makes you think he cares about you????
Posted by: RivercityJohn | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Obama is a Socialist. He studied under one, mentored under one, and promotes all the doctrines of Socialism. As such he could care less about the economy. His only goal is to grow government and the ” masses ” dependence on government. Through the forced dependence he can control virtually everything to include the military and the US Constitution. This is a very evil intentioned person…..
Posted by: Pamela R. Smith | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Have all of you forgotten Obama’s plan to tax all of us and give it to the U.N. for their “world poverty program”?
Billions a year taken from us so the U.N. can give it to some third world crap hole.
World wide socialism is knocking on our door and Obama wants to invite it in. DON’T let that happen!!
Posted by: OhNoBama | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Am I the only one who is thinking…If I was one of those “$200k income people” and I had a business and now my taxes were raised to “even things out” I woulod want that money back by:
1.Not pay my employees as much
2.Raise prices on goods & services I offer
3.Reduce employee benefits
4.Make most employees part time and cut all benefits
So people get more from Obama but less from employeer! So spending doesn’t increase.
As for the guy who is the newly wed just graduated college and trying to be a reporter. Well report this…WORK Harder!!! We all started somewhere and NONE OF US who made it ever expected a hand out. I’m 50 and work 2 jobs to make $70k. I suggest you either change careers, get a second job, or make the bride work! Its called life and its called learning to crawl before learning to walk! Take control of your own future, don’t give the control to Barak for a few bucks!
Posted by: Head hurts | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I swear by my Life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for the sake of mine.
Posted by: gormo | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
so…Obama has raised about 600 million so far. McCain has raised about 100. If we use Obama’s logic then that is totally unfair! How can McCain ever be expected to become president when he is at such a huge financial disadvantage?
Obama should give give 250 million to McCain so they will both have 350 million and be equal, you know…spread the wealth around! Don’t be selfish Obama!
socialism…gotta love it!
Posted by: Ryan | October 31, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Not wanting to pay taxes selfish? Am I still in America?
I guess that the next thing we will see is state controlled terminations of pregnancies.
Posted by: guy at the airport | October 31, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Mellisa writes:
Bo Jakes, not only is Obama’s half brother not the miserable poverty-stricken desperate man people are trying to make him out to be, he also doesn’t WANT anything from Obama. Here’s what he said (back in August):
“I am not going to start pestering him, I don’t want to look to him for help, I want to achieve things for myself.”
Give it up already. Barack Obama is under no obligation to provide for his half-brother, especially when his half-brother doesn’t need or want it!
HIS BROTHER SOUNDS LIKE A REPUBLICAN – MAYBE OBAMA SHOULD LISTEN TO HIS BROTHER.
Posted by: TommyBoy | October 31, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Everyone cannot be rich but we can surely all be poor. Obama’s tax plan will bring everyone down to the same level. This is Marxism at it’s heart.
Posted by: Von | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
As a conservative, I know what is right for me.
As a liberal, Obama knows what is right for me.
Praise be to the great Messiah O, who knoweth what is best for all.
Thy proletariat come, thy will be done.
Give us this day our daily bread, confiscated from our fatter brothers.
Not too long until our bread is soylent green.
Posted by: The Sheeple | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Is Joe Biden being selfish when he gives only $339 to charity? How can he be so darn cheap and then tell everyone else to pony up on taxes. Tax money gets sucked up by bloated government.
Posted by: Patricia | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Deb Wrote:
Hey Chaz, how do you know he didnt try to help poor auntie???? maybe she declined, just like J Hudsons mother did.Does he even know this auntie??? maybe not..please dont assume something u really dont know about.
if u become a millionare will u share your wealth with all your cousins and long lost family u dont know who may live in poverty? I think not
Have you read “Dreams of My Father”?
Seems not, or you would know he talks about this same aunt and how wonderful she was! Guess not so wonderful that he does not feel selfish about how he lives and spends money, while she is living in poverty!
Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Just because we already have a progressive tax system doesn’t mean increasing it is ok.
The point is to shrink government, not grow it more. What’s the incentive for anyone at the 200k mark to work harder and make $250k? NONE. That’s why socialism eventually fails.
Ask Sweden, a socialist republic that is falling apart at the seems from social programs.
Don’t be confused by these comments on here. Spreading your wealth IS good. Someone else spreading it for you IS NOT!
Posted by: darko | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
TOMMYBOY: “HIS BROTHER SOUNDS LIKE A REPUBLICAN – MAYBE OBAMA SHOULD LISTEN TO HIS BROTHER.”
Maybe you should too? “Of course, if I was in the US I would vote for Barack, I think everyone should.” – George Obama.
;-)
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I am in the middle class. But I smart enough to know that the top 1 % of taypayers pay *** 39% *** of all taxes. The top 1% own no where near 39% of the wealth in this country. The top 25% pay 86% of all taxes. To say they aren’t doing their fair share is illogical.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Surplus of the Clinton years??? That was a result of Reaganomics!
Clinton caused this housing crisis by putting pressure on Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac to loan out to low income folks who by the way, went default while Bush is president.
This means: with Clinton, more people had credit, and the prices of homes were driven up by this excess demand. These folks go default, there is no demand for house. Prices drop and Bush gets blamed!
No wonder you idiots are supporting Obama – you’re idiots and don’t see the BIG PICTURE!
God help us!
Posted by: Regular Guy | October 31, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I find those who complain about the wealth disparity in this country to be bitter, jealous, and envious. Were a person to gain wealth at the true expense of another, then I too hold them in contempt. But not all rich people got rich in that way; in fact the majority have not.
I am unemployed, living off my savings, the land, my hunting and fishing prowess, and my wits. I would never ask that another man pay even a penny to subsidize any of my needs or desires.
I am fortunate to have no mortgage (paid it off when I was employed and times were better), no grand material desires, and no want of another man’s earnings. I am not jealous of the wealth of others; I am thankful for that which I already have.
Posted by: Jeff Koch | October 31, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I make $300k per year because I started a consulting business 8 years ago. I have 30 employees who have full benefits. I don’t feel rich (I pay $130k in taxes a year). Having employees is risky (I pay over $100k ever two weeks in payroll). If taxes increase, I will be more reluctant to hire and will probably play it safe. Growing a business is risky since I am personally guaranteed on the loans. If I get taxeed on my insurance or 401k’s, I will probably limit what I give my employees. I wonder how Obama’s economy is doing in his home state…yikes! We need politicians who have run business, and fewer lawyers.
Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Anyone recall the amount of charity Mr. Biden gave? I know it was something redic small so maybe Mr. Obama should take a long hard look at his ticket before spouting off about selfishness (he has plenty of other reasons to “regret” his #2 choice, Biden = gaffa minute)
Posted by: cockedandlocked | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
His brother and aunt live in poverty and he wants to “preach” to me about selfishness. What a hypocrite!
Posted by: tothestars2 | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I really don’t need liberal elite’s like Obama and Biden preaching to me about selfishness. Sen Obama why don’t you practice what you preach about sharing the wealth. Obviously you’ve forgotten about your aunt who lives in a Boston housing project and your step brother who lives in a hut in Kenya. Sen Biden what contributing some of your wealth to charitable causes? I guess it’s okay to spend other peoples money, but not your own.
If you liberal elitists want to pay more in taxes be my guess, but leave the rest of us who already pay our fair share in taxes and work hard for our money alone.
Posted by: rpt | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Once started, where does it stop? I amnot rich, but I also did not drop out of school, I paid 100% of my own tuition and room and board by workin my way through college. Do I get a refund? I apy for a house I can afford. Do I get a helpin hand for the next 30 years on my new mortgae on a house that is now worth less than when I bought it 8 months ago? I didn’t think so.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
The way the lower limit on “rich” is dropping, he will soon say we *all* should be less “selfish”.
Tell you what I’m gonna do tonight. When the kids come for treats, I’m going to take half their candy and give it to kids who stayed home and didn’t “work for it”. Think the kids think that’s “Fair”?
Posted by: timbrown | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Hmm. Virtue out of selfishness. Let’s compare charitable contributions on both sides. Generosity is when you give, vs. having stolen. Selfishness is when you don’t give and can. Obama and Biden’s tax returns tell the real story on selfishness.
Posted by: BobB | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Look, as far as Barack Obama’s concerned, the American Constitution is to be revered. It was constructed by the Founding Fathers in time of great national crisis and it’s floating at a dock in Charlestown MA.
Posted by: A Difference | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Apparently Barack took a different economics class at Columbia than I did at my state university:
5 years after all the “redistribution”, the money will be back in the same hands. The poor don’t “take” money from the rich, they “borrow” it. It’s the choices and priorities that the “haves” make that make them wealthy. Redistribution is only a temporary fix unless we abandon capitalism entirely, which ain’t gonna happen.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Sharing is a generous act of selflessness. Giving to charity is a selfless act. Resenting a government for taking more of my money because they want to use it in a WASTEFUL way is not only not selfish, it is PATRIOTIC! Come on people, the government was never intended, nor is it well equipped to be a charity! Preparing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare and ensuring the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity can be done in a much more cost effecitve manner with much less than the government currently demands.
Posted by: Mark I | October 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
My bottom line…If you can walk, can talk, have 2 hands, can string words together to reasonably communicate with your fellow humans, then you have no RIGHT to sponge off me for ANYTHING…not your housing, not your health care…NOTHING….
Posted by: dlaws99 | October 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I can’t stand Obama – this entire campaign has been a creation of Axlerod and the media and Obama is just their front man. Inside information confirming this has been leaking out from disillusioned Obama campaign workers.
What Obama really seems to believe based on this long associations with people like Jeremiah Wright, Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, etc., woudn’t even have beat Hillary in the caucuses – that they stole anyway.
Posted by: SuziQ | October 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
For those of your quoting the ’10% of American’s pay 70% of the taxes’ please be aware that these 10% make 90% of the money. (that’s what makes them in the top 10%)
So why are they only paying 70% of the taxes when they make 90% of the money??
Sounds selfish to me.
WRONG…if you bothered to read my links and not spew your typical liberal talking points you would have read this little fact completely dispelling the crap you wrote above…
“top earning 25% of taxpayers (AGI over $62,068) earned 67.5% of the nation’s income, but they paid more than four out of every five dollars collected by the federal income tax (86%).The top 1% of taxpayers (AGI over $364,657) earned approximately 21.2% of the nation’s income (as defined by AGI), yet paid 39.4% of all federal income taxes. That means the top 1% of tax returns paid about the same amount of federal individual income taxes as the bottom 95% of tax returns.”
Posted by: Sasha | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
How Obama’s plan will hurt businesses …
Case in point …
Fall 2008 issue – Entrepreneur Mag highlights an Army nurse who owns a hospice franchise after seeing the need in her community. She’s very selective whom she hires and picks people who can really use the opportunity (great pay, training and benefits) and have an excellent work ethic. Most of her employees are single moms and she’s giving them a shot at having their own franchises. Her hard work and success has been rewarded — she’s on target to make $900k this year. Obama’s plan will suffocate any future growth and make her reconsider whether it’s best to scale back. A hard-working woman providing a service to the community, with employees who would otherwise be struggling to make ends meet.
Obama may not think he’s killing the American Dream, but he will be if he’s elected.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
To Patrick, who said:
“Give me a break. America’s current wealth disparity is at the same level it was in the 1920′s. The whole Republican tax cutting strategy is designed to keep their rich donors riche and the rest of us relatively poor. In terms of wealth, only 20% of americans control 84% of our nations wealth, and the richest 1% of Americans control over 34% of all America’s wealth. None of these economic elite people would have been able to amass their wealth without the infrastructure, safety, securtiy, and hard work of the rest of 80% who only control 16% of our countries wealth. So seriously, I can’t see why its unreasonable for people making over $250,000 a year to pay a tax rate comprable to the tax rate they paid in 1996.”
Stop drinking liberal kool-aid! Tax strategy “designed to keep us relatively poor”??? I am not in the top 5%, but even I don’t see that way. The tax cut is ACROSS THE BOARD. Know the meaning of those words? And no, I don’t have a problem of seeing people who make over $250,000 go back to the tax rate of the Clinton years. I just have a problem of taking the money from one and giving it to another, who doesn’t even pay taxes to begin with. And BTW, if you are so bitter about rich people, I hear that Cuba is a great place to move to. I am sure the Castro brothers will welcome you with open arms.
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The claim that rich people will fire employees due to a tax hike is ridiculous on the face of it. We are talking about personal income taxes, folks. If I’m a CEO of a Fortune 500 – tell me exactly why I start firing people because my income goes down?
Posted by: I Baja
————–
Ok, I’ll tell you, I Baha, since you obviously don’t know anything about business taxes. I own a small business, an S corp, which requires me, as an individual filing, to pay the company’s taxes. Many other small business owners face the same situation. If my company’s taxes increase by $50,000, then I have to cut $50,000 just to maintain the same profit and loss ratio. that’s at least one employee and their health benefits. that former employee then can get Obama’s consolation prize: a $500-$1000 handout (middle class tax credit?). I think if the people knew the truth, they’d rather have the job than a relatively small govt. check.
Posted by: rob | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Come on you greedy Repugs! Obama’s poor Auntie is living in a slum – and God help her if she ever gets sick. It’s up to all of us (apparently) to help the her out.
Posted by: Bjartur | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
CHANGE…In the late 1950′s most Cubans thought Cuba needed “a change” and they were right. So when a young, dynamic leader came along, every Cuban was at least receptive. When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press fell in love with him. They never questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in. He said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, and everyone followed. He said he would bring justice and equality to all, and everyone said “Praise the Lord!” The young leader said, “I will be for change and I’ll bring you change,” and everyone yelled, “Viva Fidel!” But by the time the executioner’s guns went silent, the people’s guns had been taken away. By the time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were now working for him. By the time “the change” was finally implemented Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third-World status. By the time the change was over more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes. Luckily, we in America would never fall for a young leader who promised change without asking, “what change?” Would we?
Posted by: George | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Obama has been selfish his own family lives in the slums. He has made millions of dollars, but has he tried to rebuild the boarded up low income housing built by Tony Rezko. (his neighbor, friend,realtor)
Posted by: Debbie | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Remember in 2011, the Bush tax cuts will expire and Congress and BO will not make them permanent. So folks EVERYBODY’S taxes will go up!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Mr. “Share the wealth OBAMA” LET HIS half brother live on a dollar a month… HE HAS AN AUNT WHO LIVES IN THE SLUMS of BOSTON… Mr. “Share the Wealth” is a millionaire…
But “The ONE” is smarter and better than you and I and he says we are selfish if we don’t want to give our hard-earned cash to the government ..
Can you say … leftist Hypocrite?
Posted by: Al Kelly | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
No Obama you are soo wrong…
how dare you call me selfish…
you are a very selfish individual.. and all righteous with “other peoples money”..
Again..
stay away from my 401k…
stay away from my private health care.. and please please please stay out of my personal life..
we don’t want you Obama… and this country doesn’t need a new deal, new socialism, new welfare… it’s been tried…
everytime socialism is tried it fails..
long live …. Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness
Individual freedom over collectivism… no to socialism.. No to Obama..
Posted by: Rhonda | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
There are givers and takers: Liberals are takers, Conservatives are givers
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Sounds like a lot of angry conservatives on here.
Posted by: Jay | October 31, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
You want something you haven’t earned? I call that thievery.
Posted by: tpq | October 31, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Jay, there are alot of people who WANT TO KEEP their money
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Lets spell it out for those who are still undecided. WELFARE!
Do you get up and go to work everyday?
Ever passed through the housing projects and noticed that the people living in housing YOU pay for are driving nicer cars than you?
Ever went by and saw them Leisurely washing those cars in the front yard YOU pay for while you rush around on your lunch break too busy and broke to eat because you have to go make that last minute bill payment in person before they cut off your electricity?
If NOT then vote for obama because he will see to it that even more of the money YOU work for goes to the bain of our society. More of YOUR dollars to support the people who do NOTHING more than continue to pop out fatherless children at an alarming rate and contribute to the overpopulation of our planet. The people who house and support the nations drug dealers and criminals using YOUR tax dollars.
Now IF these and other injustices make your BLOOD BOIL as it does mine, then vote for McCain.
Send the message to obama that IF he was really concerned with spreading the wealth to assist the “middle class” then he could’ve started with the $600 MILLION + that he received in campaign contributions instead of creating more brain-washing.
Posted by: Faith in FL | October 31, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Strange. When the government gives incentives for business to expand their workforce or site (tax credits – tifs – infrustructure) it changes to corporate welfare. Speaker of the House Nacy Pelosi placed an exemption to the federal minimum wage legislation for the Island of Guam. Why? It seems two of the nation’s top producers of tuna or fruit have their packing plants there and based in San Francisco (Del Monte – Chicken of the Sea) Tax credits have been provided for establishing business and manufacturing plants in the inner city as an incentive to bring business in and hire people who pay taxes and regrow the area.
Someone define rich. The current theme is defined as the people who make more than the voter listening to Obama. They had a quote of a Obama supporter who was interviewed after his 30 minute infomercial. She stated, ” Now I don’t have to worry about paying for gas or paying for my mortgage because Barrack is going to take care of it for me!”
I wish we would have someone look over the earnings tax returns of Democrats and Republicans to see who gives more to charity. That would be interesting.
Posted by: Estaban1960 | October 31, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I love that people are seeing Obama for the phony socialist he is. If he’s his brother’s keeper why doesn’t he help out his brother in the hut or his aunt in the slum? Why does he give such a tiny percentage of his income to charity? I give more than 10% of my income to charity, but the charities I give my money to help people to succeed through education, hard work and responsibility. Government welfare programs generally don’t help people succeed, they create generations of poor people who do not succeed and who vote democrat. That’s how it works — free stuff for votes.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
If Biden, who claims to be a devout Catholic, goes to church each week and puts a little money in the plate as it is passed, he only puts in $6 per week.
6 bucks, thats it, $6 a week and nothing else to anyone. He lives in a huge house and is in the top 2% yet he cannot spare more than $300 a year in charity?
Charity starts at home Barry.
Posted by: patrick | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Were all you anti-tax zealots born yesterday? So just because Bush lowered taxes for the very wealthy–during wartime, I hasten to add–all of a sudden those tax cuts are sacrosanct? Any return to sane levels is socialism? Give me a break. We have a progressive tax system, like every other modern country in the world. This red scare business is nonsense and I think you all know it. I hope so, otherwise the intelligence level in this country is worse than I thought.
By the way, it’s not just liberal blogs ridiculing Ayn Rand. It’s anyone who went beyond their 8th grade view of the world. The very wealthy do not “earn” money, they merely “make” it. The working class actually earn their money, and have been earning less while productivity has gone up. How is that fair?
Posted by: TQ | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
As much as Rand hated the socialists and even worked in Goldwater’s campaign, she despised the GOP’s religious revival and urged people to vote against Ronald Reagan because of his bowing to the religious zealots.
Often, taking away a woman’s right to choose can be worse than raising her taxes by a few percent!
Posted by: ObjectivistGuy | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
I find it incredibly insulting that Obama calls me selfish, when all I want to do is keep more of the money that I earn for me and my family.
The gall of this guy, who contributed nearly nothing to charity over the last 10 years, to call others selfish. He doesn’t even take care of his own family.
The thought of this guy occupying the White House makes me sick to my stomach.
Posted by: Ted | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
This country was in part founded because there was taxation without representation.
Ironic that with a large percentage of Americans paying no tax at all, we have the opposite problem of representation without taxation.
Time for a flat tax for all
Posted by: Bob | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
LIKE I HEARD THIS WEEK
IT IS GREAT IF YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR PEANUT BUTTER AND JELLY SANDWICH WITH A FRIEND.
IT IS WRONG WHEN YOUR TEACHER MAKES YOU SHARE YOUR PEANUT BUTTER AND JELLY SANDWICH.
CHECK OUT THE TAX RETURNS AND SEE HOW THE LIBERALS HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO CHARIT VS THE CONSERVATIVES.
LIBERALS DO NOT WALK THE TALK
IT IS A FACT
Posted by: WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Hey, OBAMA…try not being selfish with your OWN RELATIVES.
When the state determines what you can and can’t do with your money, it is theft. They did not ASK you for it. They are determining what you will do with your money. Period.
Charity comes from the HEART. Charity is something Americans have always done, borne out of a biblical worldview. NOT THE STATE and not for those who do not work.
Posted by: Diane | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
It is galling for Senator Obama who has done nothing to assist his family members calls me selfish for not desiring to send my money to those who pay no taxes. Pardon me but I helped my father and mother for over twenty years with a house and five cars. And yes I do well financially but I also live below my income believing the social security fund to which I have paid a great deal of money will not be there for me. Instead it will be means tested thus insuring that I do not recieve any payments.
Senator Obama is a socialist. he espouses socialist ideas of wealth redistribution. He wishes to take taxes from those who earn $150,000 and more and transfer thier taxes to those people who pay NO taxes.
He surrounds himself with Marxists professors, Ayers, Wright and Rashid Khaladi, all who intensely dislike America.
And yet the media passes over thses facts.
Posted by: walter | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Wow, for such a selfless guy he sure has a nice 1.6 million mansion in Chicago.
Maybe he should look in the mirror.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
So now I am a selfish racist. I hope Obama read “Atlas Shrugged” because if he and ACORN manage to pull this off, he will be faced with a lot of shrugging. The Strikers will not support the Moochers.
Posted by: Joanne600 | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
The richest 10% of the population already pay 70% of the total tax revenue.
Already there’s more people riding in the proverbial cart then pulling it, and you socialist idiots think that the rich need to be punished because it’s “what is fair.”
It’s not your money, it’s theirs. If you want your own, go earn it.
Posted by: haggis | October 31, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
This guy is absolutely disgusting. He is the master of spin. Claiming that his policies of socialism and spreading wealth are akin to Reaganomics, where everyone benefits.
The difference in Reaganomics is that Reagan was a proponent of having EVERYONE keep more of their own money, reducing taxes on EVERYONE, and eliminating waste in government.
Obamanomics are REDISTRIBUTION, plain and simple.
Posted by: NC for McCain | October 31, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Here’s an economic lesson for all you that are against tax breaks for corporations.
Cutting taxes allows them to expand and make more revenue. It’s been proven time and again.
Increase revenues means more tax revenue for the govt.
It also means economic growth and more jobs. More jobs = more tax revenue and less people on welfare/social programs.
Cutting taxes, increasing Govt budget pool, and more jobs for Americans. What’s not to like about that other than less control from the Govt…
Posted by: darko | October 31, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
john: “But I smart enough to know that the top 1 % of taypayers pay *** 39% *** of all taxes. The top 1% own no where near 39% of the wealth in this country. The top 25% pay 86% of all taxes. To say they aren’t doing their fair share is illogical.”
Did you just assume that? Because, as of 2001, the top 1% had 39.6% of the financial wealth in this country. The top 20% had 86.4%.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I wonder which financial advisor wrote The One’s dumb script for him? Marxist philosophy…..try to hide it. You can’t.
Posted by: Barbara | October 31, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Please, Obama is a smart man. He understands the most basic economic facts. When you take money from the revenue generators (i.e. businesses and people with ambition) and redistribute that money to the entitlement crowd that slows the economy. I believe my dog understands that fact.
The real reason that Obama and the Pelosi’s of this fine nation push the “spread the wealth around” philosophy is because they see the increased numbers of low ambition entitlement voters out there. They know that if they promise handout to those people their plan has succeeded. When and if they really take over power, do you really think they are going to take care of the little man? These people crave power more than the love of their own country.
Wake up America you are quickly losing what was once your country.
Posted by: Tom Prenzlow | October 31, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
OBAMANATION’S AUNT IS LIVING IN A SLUM RIGHT HERE IN UNITED STATES
AND HE CALLS US SELFISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE | October 31, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
For all his Socialist desire to spread others’ wealth around, it seems Obama isn’t very generous with his own money. Not only has this millionaire only given a pittance to charity as compaired to his contemporaries, but his African grandmother and half brother live a primitive life in mud huts surving on one dollar a month. Also, just this week it was reported that his aunt and uncle were found living in a Boston public housing project, nearly destitute. If this is how Obama takes care of his extended family, how can we trust him to spread our money around?
Posted by: Randal | October 31, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I’m starting to believe that a lot of the liberal comments on these forums are Obama campaign workers — or maybe they’re college kids living off of their parents who don’t understand life. I don’t believe the majority of people are that inept at basic math and economics. I don’t believe most people are so stupid they can’t recognize reality when it is smacking them upside the head. These people look at a blue sky and say “The sky is orange.”
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
The dirty little secret is that taxes will increase for all who pay them currently during Obama’s first term. That is becuase Bush’s tax cuts are set to expire. Which means they will go back to the rates they were … which are higer for all brackets. Does anyone thing he will extend them? I dont’… yet he never mentions this… I wonder why?
Posted by: Angry Conservative | October 31, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.”
Sheer Orwellian.
Posted by: larry | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Ppphhheewww! Thanks, Tapper for this! I was beginning to wonder if you were still willing to play ball for the Repubs! I’m relieved.
Posted by: Jackson | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Poor People: GO OUT AND WORK!!!!!!!!! Anyone can get a job! Obama – why reward the lazy! They are going to WASTE everyone else’s money and they will never LEARN to work hard and will never MAKE anything out of themselves because everything will be HANDED to them! So, why work????
Posted by: Rachel Peterson | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Nothing one hundred million former tax payers who take the Henry David Thoreau approach couldn’t solve. Besides it’s not like the IRS won’t drop three square meals a day in your lap while you do the time. Which is more than many may be able to afford at various economic levels within three years of this expected reign. And those pet projects many in congress are drooling over would be quite delayed. Such a movement will have no choice but to be embraced by many once the economy is really in the tank with business closing, 12-15% unemployment and inflation skyrocketing. All the while the UN being greased and foreign aid doubled, along with capital gains. Ten will get you one all the self appointed economists out there will still be pointing the blame finger at what will effectually be the dormant, minority, ineffectual “elephant” in the room.
Posted by: grassy knoll | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
REMEMBER IN 2011, THE BUSH TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE AND CONGRESS AND bo WILL NOT MAKE THEM PERMANENT. SO REMEMBER FOLKS EVERYBODY’S TAXES WILL GO UP EVEN THE ONES MAKING $50,000!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
What scares me the most is when Nancy Pelosi said “With Barack Obama as president, there will be no stopping us!”
The Obama administration will be one big rubber stamp of approval. The congress will write the laws, and Obama will stamp it “Approved” everytime.
There will be no more seperation of powers. Add the liberal judges to the court system by Obama and you have the Un-holy Trinity of terror.
God help us!
Will no one ride us of this meddlesome beast?!
Posted by: The Oracle | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
The cake is a lie.
Posted by: Portal | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Obama is also a creation of Axelrod’s redux of that other African American on the east coast in 2006 who he stole most of his slogans from, including “Together we can” which became “yes we can” who Axelrod dumped after he was a failure ridden office holder. He picks ood CANDIDATES who win on superficials, but they lack governing skills.
Posted by: Fraud | October 31, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
OBAMA EARNED OVER $1 MILLION DOLLARS AND CONTRIBUTED ONLY $300 TO CHARITY!!
WHO THE HELL IS HE TO LECTURE US ON
“SELFISHNESS”!!??
THIS GUY IS A SCAM!
Posted by: JAMIE | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
How is refusing to be taxed for your success any more selfish than refusing to work harder for your own success?
I think it is more selfish to be jealous of someone else’s success without acknowledging the personal responsibility that is necessary to achieve bigger goals in life.
Obama’s view on taxes only serves to perpetuate class warfare and the keeping-up-with-the-Joneses mentality that has poisoned the way we relate to our friends and neighbors. Rather than encouraging growth and innovation, his plan seems to focus on getting the “less fortunate” people caught up with the “more fortunate” people. But how does that help society as a whole? It doesn’t.
Hiking up corporate tax rates as Obama intends to do will force employers to lay off more workers, thereby slowing productivity of the economy as a whole and raising the number of unemployed Americans.
To me, the logic behind the Democratic way of throwing money at a problem and hoping it will fix itself is flawed. In reality, it is a combination of human ingenuity and fiscal responsibility that allows a person to “get ahead” in capitalism. Just ask anyone who has managed a successful business, thought of an innovative idea, or raised a family.
Successful Americans don’t become successful by relying on government. And truly successful people will tell you it’s not about the money but the passion and drive you have to pursue your own American dream. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Or as (a very successful American) Walt Disney once said, “If you can dream it, you can do it.”
Posted by: nikku | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Freedom, or equality. Can’t have both. And everyone is worse off under an ‘equal system’. Proven time and time again.
Well, not everyone- since some people are ‘more’ equal than others… Rich people love socialism- government controls more, and money buys favors, loopholes, tax breaks, etc.
Choice is yours America- a free country, or a land of equally poor folks lorded over by our ‘betters’
Posted by: Yikes | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Ted he does have gall, but they like to call it AUDACITY.
The fact is, he is communist. Socialism will not even FIT what his worldview encompasses. He is a danger to our republic.
When it was just ONE shady character in his past, fine. But add them altogether and it becomes too hard to avoid. He is a radical…his friends are radicals. YOU ARE WHO YOU HANG WITH. But, it is part of the deception to swing to the center to appear like a lamb when he is a danger within.
WITH NO RECORD AND OVER A 100 “present” votes.
He is saying that we have 5 days to fundamentally transform this country. BE AFRAID.
Posted by: Diane | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
As a Democrat, I am Proud to say that I have voted Republican for President for the First time since 1988.
John McCain is a Patriot.
Barack Obama is a Demagogue.
My home state of Florida will be going for John McCain.
Posted by: McCain Will Win | October 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Al Kelly: “Mr. “Share the wealth OBAMA” LET HIS half brother live on a dollar a month”
Why don’t you let his half-brother speak for himself? “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.” “I don’t want to look to him for help, I want to achieve things for myself.”
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Strange. When the government gives incentives for business to expand their workforce or site (tax credits – tifs – infrustructure) it changes to corporate welfare. Speaker of the House Nacy Pelosi placed an exemption to the federal minimum wage legislation for the Island of Guam. Why? It seems two of the nation’s top producers of tuna or fruit have their packing plants there and based in San Francisco (Del Monte – Chicken of the Sea) Tax credits have been provided for establishing business and manufacturing plants in the inner city as an incentive to bring business in and hire people who pay taxes and regrow the area.
Someone define rich. The current theme is defined as the people who make more than the voter listening to Obama. They had a quote of a Obama supporter who was interviewed after his 30 minute infomercial. She stated, ” Now I don’t have to worry about paying for gas or paying for my mortgage because Barrack is going to take care of it for me!”
I wish we would have someone look over the earnings tax returns of Democrats and Republicans to see who gives more to charity. That would be interesting.
Posted by: Estaban1960 | October 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
The very wealthy, Obama’s principal supporters, don’t pay any tax because they run their lives through tax-free private foundations. But I’m sure he doesn’t say they’re selfish!
Posted by: Critical Thinker | October 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Patriotism
Barry and Joe have never had a real job…oh I know Acorn, ok I will call that a job. Oh and he is a constitutional law professor, that is a joke.
These two have been taking all of their lives and now when they have the chance they are going to take more then the ever dreamed.
2 of the most liberal senators ever—what do you expect.
Posted by: patrick127 | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
on that very first comment “taking away a woman’s right to chose”, lets call it what it is…
The right to make someone cut her baby up into little pieces for her own convenience.
Teddy: As to who is the real centrist? There aren’t any. Since Clinton made the comment that Republicans are evil, there will not be a ‘center majority’ for the forseeable future. The left makes their living dividing Americans into little sub groups of ‘poor mistreateds’. The furether left the left goes, the further right the right goes. The right hangs onto traditional values, the left hates those values and the people who hold them dear. That’ll never change.
Posted by: scropp | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Aunt lives in a slum and brother lives on a dollar a month in squalor and we’re selfish?
Barry wants YOUR money so he doesn’t have to part with his.
What a hypocrite!
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I think it’s important to look at the big picture here. the top 1% of earners pay 40% of the country’s income taxes. They pay a higher percentage than everyone else. the rest of the income levels follow suit. the more you earn, the higher percentage of your income you must pay. Already unfair.
And also try to understand, it’s not the rich that are hurt by this fact. By being rich that means they already have money. It’s the people on their way up, such as myself, that have a harder time. By virginia tax law my commissions are taxed 40%. It would be hard to convince me that more of my wealth should be spread around than it already is.
Posted by: Jack | October 31, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
NO TO SOCIALISM AND/OR WORSE! NOBAMA IN 08! PRAY FOR AND FIGHT FOR AMERICA’S FREEDOM! “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.”
Ronald Reagan
Posted by: Keith | October 31, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
The seed of our recent financial collapse was the force-feeding a poison pill of socialistic politic into the mortgage market as driven by ACORN in the name of “ECONOMIC JUSTICE”.
And NOW Senator OBAMA wants to push a Marxist-Socialist Philosophy on our government and further burden the top 10% already pay 60% of the taxes?
This ain’t change boys and girls, it’s backward. The only change left is going to be a few pennies in your pockets.
Posted by: Al Kelly | October 31, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Hits it out of the park … 12 mins but well worth it … pass it along
Go to Little Green Footballs and
Scroll down to “A Message From …”
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
People are so wrapped up in red or blue we seem to miss the big picture. Aren’t we all mad as _ell that no matter how much we pay in taxes our government will out spend us. Stop
spending! That is a tax increase for the government. We are selfish because we don’t wan’t to give the government more money?. Really!! I can’t believe people fall for that.
Posted by: jd | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Which one of you is going to buy me my new car? Where’s that flat screen the Barrack said I deserved?
!What do you mean I have to get a job, I’m sorry I’m waiting for something in management to open up.
Posted by: Melvin | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
That selfish comment really stung! My husband and I started out with NOTHING! He still works 7 days a week after 27 years. We currently pay nearly 50% of his salary in taxes and it’s not enough for Obama. LISTEN UP PEOPLE – NOTHING WE HAVE WAS GIVEN TO US ON A SILVER PLATTER!!! We worked hard, saved and never lived beyond our means. And I’ll be DAMNED if we’ll be made to feel guilty about that!! And another thing, we give a HELL OF A LOT more to charity than you do, sir!
Does anybody else think it’s immoral for a politician to buy votes with money that’s not his?
The more people become dependent on the government, the more power the government has over your life. Wake up, sheeple!!!!
We are so far removed from the American ideal of the Founders, it’s scary.
“When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” – Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: BubbaJ | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
REMEMBER IN 2011, THE BUSH TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE AND CONGRESS AND bho WILL NOT MAKE THEM PERMANENT. SO REMEMBER FOLKS EVERYBODY’S TAXES WILL GO UP EVEN THE ONES MAKING $50,000!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
McCain is going to win by a landslide. Americans are not stupid. No way no how they will vote for obama.BTW how is granny?
Posted by: Mcain landslide victory | October 31, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
What the heck is he saying?
Why am I selfish to work and keep my own money?
I was once on welfare and I know well too many people who will forever depend on welfare.
Mr. OBAMA, people don’t get off welfare because it’s free money for the lazy people. No matter how much you want to tax us.
Being Lazy is for me SELFISHNESS.
I am not rich, but I don’t need tax money from rich people. OK??
Posted by: hoa | October 31, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
So let’s get down to brass tacks…Obama wants payroll tax per the wall street journal to go from 35% max to 43-45% max. And he wants to uncapp social security tax. So my max tax will go from 35 + 2 (medicare) + 3( half year of social sec) + 12 state tax plus 2 property tax = 54% to 43+2+6+12+2 or 65% of my last dollars earned. I will go to jail protesting before anybody takes my families money away that we have struggled through college and numberous jobs to earn
Posted by: jerome | October 31, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
has anyone looked at obama’s hands? he has the softest hands I’ve ever seen on a man. He hasn’t done any hard work in his life. John McCain and Sarah Palin have hands that are used to hard work. That tells me both of them have a good work ethic. Anyone who has soft hands doesn’t know the value of a day’s pay for a day’s work. He would rather take someone else’s money than work for it himself.
Posted by: armyguardmom | October 31, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Selfishness? I call it freedom.
Posted by: Krista | October 31, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“I Baja” – I apologize….
I meant to respond to “evenz”…..used to having the posters name above their post and not below it….
Posted by: RivercityJohn | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
This is the greatest set of posts I’ve read in years. How I wish John McCain would let fly with some of this. this is truly the era of blue kool-aide.
Here’s the scary part:
in a democracy, when the combined coalition of government employed (all levels), teachers, non-taxpayers, welfare recipients, deadbeats, and bums become > 50% of the voters, it is soooo easy for politicians to run on a platform of taking from those who have and giving it to those who don’t. Plus, part of what you give them is a government job so become even more in the pocket.
In my ideal democracy, no taxes paid, no vote cast. Also, in my ideal everyone pays something.
Unfortunately, these concepts are far beyond most of the people in this country. They just know there’s a free lunch somewhere.
Posted by: James Johnson | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
How this vacuous tool continues to fool the dolts in this country is beyond me. Barack Obama is a SOCIALIST…call it it was it is and stop with this “progressive” crap. The man wants to take from the people he deems “rich” and give it to those he deems “middle class”…..
Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
So we are supposed to be happy sharing the wealth when Obama won’t even share his personal wealth with his own family???
Posted by: Knight of Ni | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Corporation don’t pay the taxes, we do in the form of higher prices. Too many people/papers/news supporting Obama is afraid of be called racists, but I really don’t care what the rest of the world thinks and WILL NOT support a socialist. He has outlined many failed programs from their past that he wants to return to the table like a new bill of rights and restrict the freedom of speech of anyone who don’t support Obama. Raising taxes will hit the Middle class and Poor terribly when Small Business will stop hiring and firing people to ensure they make ends meet! Obama has said he does not support the Constitution, since it limits his Power to do what he wants! That allow should ensure he never gets any further in Government!
Posted by: Eric M | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Corporation don’t pay the taxes, we do in the form of higher prices. Too many people/papers/news supporting Obama is afraid of be called racists, but I really don’t care what the rest of the world thinks and WILL NOT support a socialist. He has outlined many failed programs from their past that he wants to return to the table like a new bill of rights and restrict the freedom of speech of anyone who don’t support Obama. Raising taxes will hit the Middle class and Poor terribly when Small Business will stop hiring and firing people to ensure they make ends meet! Obama has said he does not support the Constitution, since it limits his Power to do what he wants! That alone should ensure he never gets any further in Government!
Posted by: Eric M | October 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
You guys are terrific – my favorites so far (really too many coming too fast to keep up):
Posted by: Ryan | Oct 31, 2008 3:28:14 PM – Obama needs to share his campaign funds
Posted by: Giovanni Bartucchi | Oct 31, 2008 3:24:33 PM – what we know about Joe the Plumber vs. what we know about Obama
Posted by: Carl | October 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Bill got it right earlier. I earn $180,000 per year. 8 months ago I got rid of our lawn care service. I saved $125 per month. I use to get my car washed at CarSpa, but not any more. I do it myself now. My wife use to wash her SUV at ProntoWash, but not anymore. We save another $125 per month. I wanted to upgrade our DirectTV to include the HD channels and get a SlingBox. Both purchases are on hold until I see who wins the election. If Obama wins I will be hoarding cash for the next 4 years and we will be buying gasoline and food only which means no new cars, appliances, or electronics. I want to see of bottom up economics works if the people at the top choose not to participate.
Posted by: Kerry | October 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I pray to God I’m around for the next revolution, when the socialists in America finally get what they deserve.
Posted by: FORREST | October 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
ED: A lot of rich people would leave me struggling to deem their dollars “hard earned”.
No ordinary rich man has left me struggling…it was the Democrats who decided to tax my social security. I have no income except it and a small savings which they now want to tax with Capital gains.
Nice try …you obviously have not paid any attention to what the Democratic socialist have already done to this country.You just want the free lunch.Trust me, you’ll get a free lunch in the bread line like the rest of us if the Democrat Socialist are in charge.
And while the “O” talks of selfishness, his tax returns and Bidens which they filed for the campaign show the “O” gave 1% up until he started running and he started making millions 2 years ago. And even then he and “M” were way above most of us in earnings. He and “M” gave about 4% now that they are rich.
Biden gave a little over $3000 OVER TEN YEARS!Out of 2.4 Million he saw fit to give so little it doesn’t even register.
McCain, gave 24% of his income to charity
And Palin who is no millionaire gave 5%.
And you think those two Democrate’s are going to give you a Free hand out and a hand up? Make me laugh, while I stretch to the breaking point on what those Democratic idiots left me to live on.
Posted by: CT | October 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
i work like a dog and work for myself…..the government is supposed to work for ME NOT ME for the government..
Posted by: diane padluck | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Not that anything Senator Obama says about economics makes any sense, but when you CUT government spending and taxes, then, his words come true: “Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore.”
Posted by: Adam | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
I am not rich, but get by because that I want to be. “We”, “Everybody”, “All”, these are scare words. Socialist or Communist or not, they love these words. At first, it sound hemonous and utophia world, and that what exactly IT. In reality, ideas of everybody should share its wealth is obsurd at best. America that I know and love because of its known principle “Valunteer”, and it do not impoose on it citizens to share its wealth and it should be it it that way. When one force others to do things that not longer pure heart and it will develope rebellent.
Posted by: ULO71 | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
DB | Oct 31, 2008 3:05:56 PM….. I don’t know what liberal ruined state you live in but your taxes are going up. You should already know that the Bush cuts are going to expire. You’re going to pay higher taxes on all purchases both in hidden and visible form. Add to that the fact that the Obama team’s math just doesn’t add up. All of us are going to have more taken out of our pay no matter how much we make and at higher rates than ever before. The coming storm will make Jimmy Carter’s stagflation look like paradise.
Posted by: Flange | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Obama-ites: I propose this test to demonstrate whether this is “Do as I say, not as I do.”
If it’s truly “patriotic” and such a higher calling to pay taxes, lead us by example! Why not ask all “Blue” people to forego claiming ANY deductions on their income tax returns this year. Just use the 1040 EZ form (no itemized deductions – even if they are legally entitled to them). Take only the personal and dependent exemptions and let Uncle Sam keep what they’ve over-paid.
Then when they realize others won’t be doing likewise, watch how any “selfish” people will suddenly materialize.
Posted by: Kevin J G | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
What about those who might benefit from these “gifts” from the government, but just feel it is wrong? At what point do we start to feel like chumps for not taking the handout?!?
Just think of all the people Obama could have helped with the money he spent on that 30 minute ad? How many people could have kept their homes if he had just distributed THAT wealth.
Posted by: Mom in Texas | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
So now we’re selfish? My husband and I are in our mid-60s, retired, and living on our retirement and SS. We live modestly, own an older RV we can’t afford to take out except once a year. We give to our church and donate money, food, clothing and time.
I paid for my ENTIRE BA by working 40 hours a week and going to school at night. I have a $34,000.00 student loan for my Master’s, which I received in 2005. The payments come out of my retirement check.
Obama has two relatives living in squalor, a half-brother and an aunt.
Practice what you preach, Obama!!
Posted by: Old Woman | October 31, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
As an immigrant who started from zero, even not speaking the language of the land, and got ahead i worry about the future of this “land of opportunity.” The methods that are already employed by Obama’s camp, the pronouncments of plans bring memories from my past years of growing up under communist rule. Take it away from hard working and give to ones that are so called underprivileged, left behind, oppressed.
I can’t figure out why should I be forced by government to pay more for bums who chose easy way.
Wake up America before Marxists take over.
Posted by: Waclaw Borcz | October 31, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
We have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the purpose of the government is to protect our basic rights and promote the common good. That’s according to the United States Constitution. When did the government get the right to take my money and give it to someone else? Most people who are well off have had to work hard to get there and that’s the way it should be! What happens when you help a butterfly out of a cocoon? It dies. Government handouts do not promote the common good — they reward failure and penalize success. If you don’t like capitalism, please move to a socialist country. There are plenty to choose from.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Now he calls it “selfish” not to want to be FORCED to hand over your money so the “obama” can dole it out as he sees fit. This man is and absolute JOKE.
Wake-Up America!
Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Selfish??? Is that why your brother lives on $3 a month, your aunt lives in squalor???
You have over $639,000,000 yet you continue to demand more donations???
Barry you are PATHETIC and UNAMERICAN.
Obama will DESTROY THIS COUNTRY!!!
VOTE McCAIN PALIN–The REAL HOPE for this country.
Posted by: are you kidding | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I have been responsible all my life. Studied in school when others were out partying, had the number of children I could afford to raise, paid my bills on time, saved money, invested wisely. Now, instead of being able to enjoy the fruits of my labor, I’m supposed to cheerfully agree to give it to those who did not take advantage of the educational opportunities given to everyone in this country, to those who had children they can’t afford to raise, to those who can’t work because they are addicted to drugs or alcohol, to those who spent every dime they had without putting some aside for a rainy day? I’m not against helping those who can’t help themselves but I draw the line at helping those who are responsible for their own failures. Obamha himself is proof that anyone can make a success of themselves. Throwing money at a problem never solves anything!
Posted by: jojopaints | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
To the comments Posted by: George | Oct 31, 2008 3:35:09 PM
You’re the reason I love this country so much. Well stated! Somebody gets it!
Posted by: YaGottaBeKiddingMe | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
It is selfish. The nation owes the world 11 trillion dollars, which our kids will have to repay sooner or later with interest. The socialism for GOPers means 39% tax instead of 35% – wow, this is ridiculous. Plus, it is the 90s tax rate when we have the longest expension of economy. I guess Republicans really suffered during those years. This is ridiculous, laughable argument.
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The rhetoric gushing from this man is nothing less than amazing. What is even more amazing, scary actually, is that there is such a large number of ignorant, ill-informed people who are going to vote for him based on that rhetoric. It is they who are going to decide this election. Obama knew from the beginning how to manipulate these people. The future of this nation is dismal and I see nothing but turmoil and conflict internally for many years to come. I truly do not think that the American people will tolerate the “changes” he and the Democratically controlled government will force upon us. Whether it will lead to violence will depend upon the methods he will employ to amend the constitution and the means with which he will try to implement those amendments. We are a nation divided over great issues and Obama’s election will polarize us further. If he and his nearly single party government begin laying down their agendas against the will of the majority of Americans, I believe most people will be awakened and civil disobedience will begin on a grand scale.
Posted by: Darryl G. | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Hey, I’m proud to be selfish. I work hard to make my income, and I don’t want to “spread” the wealth around. I’m already at the 35% bracket, and add to that another 9.3% in CA. Sorry, I pay enough.
Please, go ahead and call me selfish. Please!
Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
OBAMA=SOCIALIST=GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF YOUR MONEY=YOU WILL PAY MORE, MORE, MORE. THE WELFARE STATE DOES NOT WORK!!!
OBAMA’S PLATFORM IS INHERENTLY EVIL AND ANTI-AMERICAN
Posted by: Wisconsin | October 31, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
There is no such thing as a Trickle-Up effect. Eventually, there will be a point when the top tax rates are so high that the “evil rich” will simply stop working and in turn tax receipts will go down. Also, I would like to see some middle-class Joe with a high school education working as a mechanic try to run a Fortune 500 company. He wouldn’t have the slightest idea what to do. Everybody trying to defend the middle class, give it a break already, nobody wants to hear it anymore.
Posted by: Phillip Giampapa, P.h.d. | October 31, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
What’s happened to the party of JFK?
Posted by: BubbaJ | October 31, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Sorry, but, I have never heard of anyone getting rich by taking handouts for a living. Paid for by US taxpayers!
Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | October 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
What’s more selfish, a hard working American who wants to keep alittle more of what they earn, or the non-working American who wants a piece of what someone earned?
Welcome to America, if you want something…go earn it. Handouts are for losers.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Yes, us free market capitalists are very selfish.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Obama should know that the rich don’t earn their money, by and large, through salaries — they earn much more in interest, dividend and capital gains.
Hence raising personal tax rates doesn’t impact the rich but will hurt the middle class. I know Obama now states that he will not raise taxes on those earning less than $250k. But hello Obama fans: that will prove out a lie based on a longstanding reality. First, he is going to raise capital gains tax, and for much of the middle class, that will hurt. Then on top of that with all this new spending and spreading the wealth around, the middle class is going to get hit/socked with more taxes, guaranteed.
The dirty little secret in politics going back 30+ years is if you are the Federal Government and you need more tax receipts, it is the middle class (not the rich) that will pay. There simply are not enough rich and super-rich out there to make a material difference in tax receipts in terms of marginal rates on income. The lion’s share of income taxes is and will continue to be paid by the middle class.
Maybe Obama will be the American wunderkind President that many proponents dream of, but the bottom line is his economic policies with respect to taxing and spending (and lying about it, ostensibly not hitting the middle class) is pretty traditional Democratic fare that won’t hold water when all the facts are in. Unfortunately, the majority of the American people, who by the way are middle class, are 1) apparently too stupid to see it or 2) have other economic interests that put them firmly in the court of the trial lawyers, teacher’s unions and big labor or 3) are paranoid about Row v Wade being overturned notwithstanding it is “settled law” according to the Chief Justice.
It would be nice that we had a President that cared about building on American strengths and not playing to special interests that will not in the long run support better education, more competitive industry and more effective tort systems.
Se la vie…the good news is Obama inherits what the Democrats have reaped in terms of failed Fannie and Freddie and now nearly 20% of American homeowners are underwater in large part because the subprime mess and putting people in homes they cannot afford has consequences, though Barney Frank, Charles Shumer, Chris Dodd and Nancy Pelosi will clearly beg to differ.
Anyway that makes Obama a lame duck on Day One of his Presidency, and when he sucks as a President, we can then move on.
Posted by: John Q | October 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Selfishnesh … is a bunch of old geezers demanding that 20 year olds pay for their retirement benefits.
Selfishnesh is when radical bigots who hate white people demand money from people who work for a living.
Posted by: BlackBubba | October 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
This is one ‘selfish’ veteran and proud of it.
I served my country and earned less than 10K a year. Worked my way through college and bettered myself….and this guy has the NERVE to call me SELFISH. The only SERVICE OBAMA has is to serve HIMSELF.
I work 60-80 weeks for what I earn and am by no means ‘rich’; but what I earn is MINE.
If Barak Hussen OBAMA wants to take it way from me then what is my incentive to work. I will just hop on the welfare wagon.
But I can’t do that, I am to PROUD. I don’t want someone else to work for me, I just want to keep what is MINE. When OBAMA starts taking $$$ from the 5% that pays 95% of the taxes, these people are going to leave….
With passport in hand I ‘SELFISHLY wait for Tuesday.
Posted by: selfish_veteran | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Mike wrote:
“look at Russia and now at China. Both have now more millionaires than the USA.”
Where did you get your numbers from?? Try getting the real numbers like:
China: 345000 millionaires
Russia: 88000 millionaries
U.S.: 9.3 million millionaires
as per TNS Reports
Posted by: Frank | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
@ bartonizer, who wrote: “How much of a disparity of income needs to exist in our country before some of you cry “foul”? The trickle-down effect is BS. Bush’s tax cuts aimed at the wealthy, and you can see the results. OF COURSE a super wealthy candidate wants to keep their tax cuts. Do you really think that a corporate CEO that makes $5 million a year provides new jobs with his or her tax cut? We’re in a recession, and it’s the rich people that need help? For most of us in the middle, a tax cut sounds pretty good.”——————————————
You are quite wrong in your statement that ‘trickle down’ does not work. In fact, history has told us that when you cut taxes, even on the higher marginal tax rates, gross tax revenues DO increase. I am referencing an article by the Joint Economic Committee from 1996 comparing the results of the Reagan tax cuts of 1981 to the tax increases of Clinton in 1993. The proof is in the numbers.
Posted by: Carson | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I guess I’m selfish, since I don’t want to give more money to The Barackocracy to dole out. Funny, I gave nearly 10% of my AGI to charity the last five years (AGI >$100k per year). I’m satisfied to give to charities of my choosing because I have some idea that the money is actually reaching the intended target. For instance, this year my church sent a mission to Thailand and we “purchased” the freedom of 65 children out of the sex slave industry and had them placed in a Christian orphanage where they can grow and learn. No government involved, no bureaucratic red tape, no PR campaign or advertising, we just did it. There is no way a US government program could have accomplished this with the small amount of funds we spent. Obama has no interest in really helping anyone but himself. Just check out his level of charitable contributions. He gave a whopping 3.85% of his AGI to charity from 2000 to 2006 (look it up, liberals!)I’m glad he gave, I just think it is the height of hypocrisy to call us “selfish” when his own giving is such a poor example.
Posted by: TBucket | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I want to know why Obama wasn’t spreading his wealth around if he believes it is patriotic to do so and selfish if you don’t. I guess by his description he and Michele are selfish people and always have been. There were plenty of people in his church and in his community that he could have given to. LOL. What a FAKE OBAMA IS.
As it is, I am hearing that my state and city will be taxing me more next year and now Obama, IF elected, wants to tax me too. If he plans on taking away the Bush tax cuts and give me some of the wealth he wants to spread around, I figure I will end up paying more.
I pray Obama loses!
Posted by: dianeremax | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
If Obama was so concerned about giving the poor some extra money, why did he only donate an avg 1.1% of their income to charity until the last 2 years when he increased his donations to a whopping! avg 5.4% ? Wow, real compassion there. Obviously he doesn’t believe in spreading HIS wealth.
Posted by: Debs | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
The people who take the tax dollars from others are mostly LAZY and ENVIOUS! Is that better than selfish?
Posted by: ian | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Desiring to be generous is a good thing. But I’m not so sure you can call it “generous” when you want to give away someone else’s money.
Posted by: NB | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I guess I’m selfish, since I don’t want to give more money to The Barackocracy to dole out. Funny, I gave nearly 10% of my AGI to charity the last five years (AGI >$100k per year). I’m satisfied to give to charities of my choosing because I have some idea that the money is actually reaching the intended target. For instance, this year my church sent a mission to Thailand and we “purchased” the freedom of 65 children out of the sex slave industry and had them placed in a Christian orphanage where they can grow and learn. No government involved, no bureaucratic red tape, no PR campaign or advertising, we just did it. There is no way a US government program could have accomplished this with the small amount of funds we spent. Obama has no interest in really helping anyone but himself. Just check out his level of charitable contributions. He gave a whopping 3.85% of his AGI to charity from 2000 to 2006 (look it up, liberals!)I’m glad he gave, I just think it is the height of hypocrisy to call us “selfish” when his own giving is such a poor example.
Posted by: TBucket | October 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I don’t feel very selfish on April 15th of each year.
Posted by: Susan | October 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Let me just be heard people! If the rich spent their money enough to keep this economy moving Barack would not have a leg to stand on. The fact is they don’t! The rich are only concerned with the rich, Hell, they consider everyone else, not the middle class, but rather the working class. They accumulate more money by leveraging it in investment while they count on the working class to stay working so they can continue to make more money. That’s the way the economy works and there’s nothing wrong with that. Except that the working class are getting the shorter end of the stick every day. The working class make up the majority, so you do the math. Whose putting in the most tax dollars to fund the government? Some of you might say, “well I only pay less than $15,000 a year in taxes” I’m not getting taxed too much.” Multiply your $15,000 by 50 million working class Americans, now the math starts to make sense… Ah haaaa!
Posted by: Chris in Connecticut | October 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
This incredibly condescending egomaniac has an inordinate amount of gall to call anyone who doesn’t want even more of their hard earned money taken from them to give to someone else who may be irresponsible and/or just plain lazy. Further, I can guarantee you that my family has been far and away more generous in our charitable giving than the Obamas, who just happen to make over twice, almost three times what we bring in. He can take his tax increases and redistribution of wealth and stick it where the sun doesn’t shine!
Posted by: Lily | October 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
The Audacity of Deceit by Barack Obama
Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Voter2be–if the selfish government (our true enemy) tries to force me to share my wealth, this “rugged individual” and millions more like me, will fight back. When the cities explode in flames (it would only take a little spark!) you and your fellow leftists days will be numbered. You will likely die at the hands of the scabby rabble you want to give my hard-earned money to, but if you come after it yourself, I’ll gladly turn your head into a canoe.
LEAVE ME ALONE LIBERALS! If you want a socialist utopia, pay for it yourself!
Posted by: Big Bear | October 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Ayn Rand: “The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.”
Posted by: Garry | October 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
For selfish_veteran:
No one is trying to take your money. Read newspapers. It is for people making 250K and more. The same as they paid in 90s. Are you telling me we had socialism in 90s? Are you deaf? It is 39% versus 35%!!! 4% difference makes the difference between socialism and capitalism???
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
~Thomas Jefferson~
Posted by: Hugh | October 31, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
It is not Charity when the government forces you to give up your money. It is not selfish to want to use your own money, that you have earned, the way you would want to use it. What is selfish is the idea that Obama gets to force us to give him our hard earned money, to do with what ever Obama wants. Obama is concerned with his own idea, that he is not thinking of what it will do. Vote for McCain and keep our country free.
Posted by: Chri | October 31, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
REMEMBER IN 2011, THE BUSH TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE AND CONGRESS AND bo WILL NOT MAKE THEM PERMANENT. SO REMEMBER FOLKS EVERYBODY’S TAXES WILL GO UP EVEN THE ONES MAKING $50,000!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Hey Obama,
Charity begins at home. What about your poor aunt in Boston?
Figures. It’s just a charade. The guy is power hungry and Marxist.
And Zeke, give it a rest. The more you write, the bigger fool you become.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
How is Sen Obamas Grandmother doing? I have been worried, but have not heard anything. Anyone have an update?
Posted by: Allison | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Obama is also a creation of Axelrod’s redux of that other African American on the east coast in 2006 who he stole most of his slogans from, including “Together we can” which became “yes we can” who Axelrod dumped after he was a failure ridden office holder. He picks ood CANDIDATES who win on superficials, but they lack governing skills.
Posted by: Fraud | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The board is slightly screwed up…I see may comments to Ed come out as posted by diane and someone elses come out as CT…weird.
CT It seems the board is already giving things away under someone elses name. LOL!
Posted by: CT | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Anyone who thinks Bush has been a de-regulator is just ignorant. More regulations have been instituted, and costs associated with government regulations have increased more, during his 8 years then under any President in history. It’s not de-regulation that ruined the economy, it was the refusal of Congress to stop government subsidized, sub-prime loans to those who couldn’t afford them, while articially low interest rates caused housing prices to inflate to unrealistic levels.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
You want Change?
That’s all you’ll have left in your pocket after Obama gets through.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Senator Obama is wrong to equate government welfare programs with charity. Charity comes voluntarily out of altruism, compassion, love. Government programs come from mandatory taxation enforcable by imprisonment and fines.
AHG!
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
LOL SUSAN: On April 15 all us “selfish” people should be “patriotic”, slap a smile on our faces and PAY PAY PAY! The messiah will spend our money wiser then we will.
NOBAMA NOBAMA NOBAMA
Posted by: vinman | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Yes I am “selfish” then…I want to keep what I earned.
Man I hope McCain wins!!!
Posted by: Brad | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Aengil…
Don’t know what news you’ve been reading but Obama want’s to shove his tax ideas and fix-it ideas down our throats and he isn’t asking us a thing. He knows better what to do to my money than I do Right????? Duh!
So you say his half brother should be respected for what he wants? Do you think that OBAMA wants to respect the rest of us for what we want?…
How about respecting the guy who likes his health coverage… how about respecting the tax payer’s hard earned cash.
You further make my point but anybody who has a pair of balls and a millionaire and gives a crap about his family would insist on coming to the aid of someone so destitute. Obviously it wasn’t that important to “The ONE”.
But with OUR MONEY HE CAN BE A HERO to the WORLD! YIPEEEEEEE! …. Fools all!
Posted by: Al Kelly | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
How about his using some of his “war chest” money and doling that out to the under-served in this country? His obamabots sent the money to him to spend however he chooses. Why has he spent it on himself and his election? Selfishness??
Posted by: anorm | October 31, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I have worked hard my entire life. I struggled to pay for college, took out a loan(I am still repaying) and I currently drive a 10 year old car. I pay my bills, bought a house, and have a job, never once asking for a goverment hand out.
People need to take responsibility for their actions. Spreading the wealth is a term for welfare. My solution, cut welfare, and make everyone get a job.
Posted by: Jthornto | October 31, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
It started at 250,000, the Obama cut it down in his infomercial to 200,000, Biden cut it down to 150,000 and today Bill Richardson cut it down to 120,000. In about 1 month is has gone down to more than half, but January when he takes office it will be down to EVERYONE and the only change we will have is what is in our pockets. AMERICA we do not need a Socialist President, we need a president that will work for us and not one that wants us to work for HIM…
Posted by: Antonio | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Posted by: Greg: “Are you deaf? It is 39% versus 35%!!! 4% difference makes the difference between socialism and capitalism???”
Greg, you have great skill in persuading the masses. They must ultimately trust the Obama’s promises of goodies and gifties. Your service has been noted and you will be contacted should an appointment come open once the Obama wins.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
It always amazes me when people find it convenient to blame older people for this dilemma.
I’m in my 60s and work 7 days a week to make ends meet. There will be no retirement so don’t cover all senior citizens with your blanket accusations.
My generation paid for WWII which is why you are free to post your whines on the internet instead of living under communism. My generation had to pay for the Viet Nam war. We are now helping pay for the Gulf War from years ago and Iraq war today. We paid for the roads and schools you younger people enjoy.
So the next time you want to bash an older person, remember one thing. Without us, you wouldn’t have even been born . To think about it, from some of these posts, that probably wouldn’t have been such a bad thing after all.
Posted by: TGood | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Forrest — excellent comment. I’m with you brother. I make over $100,000 a year — soon to be in the super wealthy classification — by next week at the rate it has been coming down. We have been cutting way back on expenses also. Of course that’s the trend all over as the consumer spending numbers show. Let’s see how trickle up economics works. Let’s see, the government takes our money and after wasting half of it on the bureaucracy they give it to welfare recipients who spend it. So the money goes back into the market after the government gets its cut. Meanwhile the money I paid in taxes could have gone to an investment in my business, such as a new employee or compensation for an existing employee. The individual getting the welfare check might have gotten that check plus the government’s cut from an employer. So who is the winner? The government and only the government.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Do you people actually think the money you earn through work is yours? Don’t be stupid, that’s the government’s money. Be glad they let you keep any of it.
Posted by: tim maguire | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Last week, that lisping fool Barney Frank said that wealthy Americans would be ASKED to pay higher taxes. If they’re just asking, can we just say no?
Posted by: SJM | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Can any one of you republicans beating the same drum about “my money! stay away from it” understand that this policy is not focused on you and your money, or those who do not have as much of an earned income, its about fixing our economy in a way that provides a stronger market stability and opens more doors for individuals to pursue their capitalistic goals.
If you make more than 250k a year and you’re so concerned with keeping all the extra income you earned when you should have been donating time, money, and care into the country and its people to begin with, then yes, you are being selfish.
Instead its dodging taxes, hording finances for elite bonuses, and eagerly watching your bank balance rise, contribute to the country that gave you this opportunity for success. Its not all about you and your money.
Be proud of your accomplishment but do not let your ego blind you. To you its the money you earned so you’d like to make interest off it, to someone else its a chance to get where you are and give back. The way it “should be” for a country. Your way is the way it “often is” for a person.
If you do understand this then you have a lot more to do now in life than to just earn that 250k salary everyday. Go enjoy what you bring into this world, rejoice in how much it helps the country and the world.
Posted by: Not like most of these republicans | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“A liberal’s compassion is limited ONLY by the size of YOUR wallet”!
Posted by: hardworkin'guy | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
The rich will not be paying more taxes. These folks are smart. That’s why they have money. They have fancy lawyers that find loop holes in the tax codes, they set up off shore bank accounts and they know how to hide their money.
Obama may think he’s smart, but those with big cash are smarter. So where is Obama gonna get all the cash he plans on spending? From those who don’t have fancy lawyers or off shore bank accounts. That means you and me regardless of our income level.
He’ll change his mind and decide the country would be better off if everyone was taxed higher. After all, that would fit his fairness doctrine. End result, the next not so great depression.
Oh yea, he’ll blame Bush for that too.
Posted by: StoneBroke | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Selfishness? It’s selfishness not to want the government to raise your taxes? Whatever!
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
If any of you pinheads think he’s just going after the people making over 250K….you are what Marx called a “useful idiot”.
Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Al Kelly: “anybody who has a pair of balls and a millionaire and gives a crap about his family would insist on coming to the aid of someone so destitute.”
Obama’s half brother ISN’T destitute. “They are comparing the way I live to the way he lives,” he said. “They compare my world with his world. I have a good life. It’s not like I live in the gutter. I’m happy with the way I live.”
How are you not getting this?
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
I’m against higher taxes but I’m all for giving to charity. I hear BO’s half-brother is living on pennies a day in a hut in Kenya. I’m in for $5, who is with me?
Posted by: hippygumbo | October 31, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
I find it odd that democrats accuse others of selfishness when they donate less of their income to charity than do republicans.
The idea that not wanting to pay taxes is as selfish as not wanting to flush it down the toilet.
What you tax, you get less of. What you subsidize, you get more of. What is Obama talking about taxing, and what is he talking about subsidizing?
Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Obama should give some of his money to his brother and his aunt before giving away other people money.
I don’t like Obama, Pelosi and Reid combination at all.
Posted by: mrducster | October 31, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
FACT: Americans give more money than any other country in the world but Obama calls us selfish!
JFK: Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country. [selfless people]
BO: Ask not what you can do for your country – ask what your country can do for you. [selfish people]
Posted by: dianeremax | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Again..
stay away from my 401k…
stay away from my private health care.. and please please please stay out of my personal life..
First of all Obama wants nothing with your 401K, so get your facts, a decade long philosophy of deregulation is what would cost you your 401k, deregulation that McCain was cheerleader for. Second…under a Obama admin you would keep your private health care if you have it, he only wants to try to lower premiums, (you are thinking of Hillary Clinton’s plan) AND COME ON…McCain and Palin have already said they would over turn Roe V Wade via supreme court by making the state decide abortion right thereby overturning Roe V Wade, and to contradict her self appointed federalist approach, she want to have a constitutional ammendment that would define marriage between a Man and Woman, thereby making the states civil union or same sex marriage rights null and void. IF that isn’t injecting government into your private life – I don’t know what is…Get your fact straight before you vote…you may realize you are smarter than all the lies being thrown out there by the spin doctors…AND Plainsm – there are no words, well may there are…I respect free speech…but you are a ignorant human being. Honest but ignorant…I feel sorry for you and the misguided hatred you feel toward people people not like you…it’s sad really.
Posted by: redsoxfan | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Bruce says “Warren Buffett and Paul Volker and Robert Rubin and General Powell are all supporters and endorsers and advisors of Senator Obama. Now that is a cabal of Communists and terrorists! “.
These guys are cringing in their skin for supporting Obama. I am curious as to how they feel now after they have heard obama’s “redistributive change”. Nothing is as clear as that recording. Socialism is a belief that Obama internalizes. That is why he will lose this election.
Posted by: Unselfish | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
His friends are fiends of socialism, liberation theology that harbors hatred for our country and Israel, terrorists, real estate fraud, and not to mention that Bill Ayers dedicated one of his books to Robert Kennedy assasin Sirhan Sirhan.
Look at what kind of company Barack Obama keeps!
Obama has years of his biograghy missing from public view, he has kept a secret who paid for his Harvard tution… he has not released his grades, not released his final thesis paper, not released his medical records, and more.
Obama’s kind of CHANGE will be built on this foundation. No THANKS!
Posted by: jim | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Description of those who want others to support them through their hard work by paying higher taxes: ‘Selfishness’
Posted by: Flanders | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
T Good: “It always amazes me when people find it convenient to blame older people for this dilemma.”
Who is blaming older people? Maybe I missed a post.
On a side note, how do you feel about all the ageism targeted at McCain? It irks me, and I’m < half his age.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
I think I’m voting for Joe The Plumber. Why you ask? I know more about every aspect of this mans life (including what time he normally goes to the bathroom) than what Barrack Obama’s real name is, where he was born and what schools he has attended.
Posted by: Frank | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Selfish? Look at how little Obama gave to charity before he started his run for president. And even how much he gives now? Many, many, middle class, poor and rich Americans give much more to charity than him. Who´s selfish? How much will charities suffer is Big Brother Obama takes more in the name of “spreading the wealth”?
Also, his plan to remove the social security tax cap of 95,500 means ANYONE making more than that will see a big tax increase if he is elected.
One of many lies.
Posted by: Tony | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Using logic seen on this post…
I’m in the 28% tax bracket, I pay more in taxes than someone in the 25% bracket. I earned that money through hard work, and the government has no right to take the extra above what someone in the 25% bracket pays. Thus, Bush and company are Socialists.
In addition to the extra taxes I pay, some of it is being redistributed to services and programs to be used by others less fortunate, and of which I have no use for, such as education (I have no children), unemployment funds (I have a job), and Social Security (which will be drained by the time I retire). Thus, the Bush administration is Socialist.
Posted by: chi_cs | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Call me selfish but I don’t want Obummer giving my money away. I earned it, hence the term “my money.”
Posted by: beancounter | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Aengil: Just because someone who has two rats to rub together thinks they’re rich doesn’t make them lucky to have two rats. Obama’s brother may be happy and that’s great, but stop suggesting that his destitute family members are out of bounds for discussion. If I had a family member living in squalor, as he has at least two, they would be cared for. His are not, particulary his poor projects-bound aunt.
Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
NEWSFLASH: All INTERESTS ARE SELF-INTERESTS
As such, all choices to pay or not pay taxes are out of “selfish-ness” as each individual is looking to satisfy something from within by which a choice is made
Obama is an idiot calling it “selfish”; of course it is, no person wants to pay for another person’s irresponsible behavior; a person who is not taking ownership of the myriad of choices made which created the life he or she is living
It’s in an individual’s self-interest, thus selfishness, to act on his or her own behalf toward self-reliance, self-governance and independence
This is why Democrats are awful people, they do not inherently assimilate FREEDOM & CHOICE from within by which to extend to others
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Obama increasingly makes no sense. His economic plan is built on sand. People need to think long and hard about their support for this very dangerous political figure. False messiahs come a dime a dozen, but seldom do they get this far. Thanks, media, for covering his sorry behind.
Posted by: paul b. | October 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Why are we discussing the following question: What tax rate should those who earn above $250K pay relative to those who make less? Asking the question itself wreaks of an European model of socialism as we are attempting to control how much each American takes homes by spreading the wealth. The question is how to we maximize the growth of the economy so that everyone can earn more. We should focus on growing the pie rather than how to divide the pie. To grow the pie, we need to make our country more competitive relative to our countries. The answer is give American companies incentives to invest, take prudent risks, and allow them to compete with their international competitors. If Dell has pay a 35% tax on profits a Korean competitor only has to pay say 20% on profits. Which company can keep its computer prices lower, allowing it to grow its revenue faster and employ more workers, and earn larger profits to grow its stock price. Oh, also the government collects more taxes as a lower tax on a larger profit will eventually be larger than a larger tax on a smaller profit. Everyone in the United States wins at the expense of foreign competitors. This should be the focus of tax questions. Oh, by the way, when was the last time anyone was hired by someone who is supposed to benefit from Obama tax cuts. Most jobs come from the companies/individual who are the target of Obama’s tax increase. Higher Taxes = Fewer New Jobs. The economics is simple if one takes time to think about it without partisan glasses.
Posted by: Ray | October 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
TO: Not like most of these republicans -
You are so naive.
Posted by: dianeremax | October 31, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
LOL – Good luck with that one, Barry. What a tool.
Posted by: steve | October 31, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Breaking News: Internal polls shows McCain gaining ground and about to shock Obama and the world.
Joe American
Posted by: Barry Gregory | October 31, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
“The Bill of Rights reads: ‘Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . .’
It does not demand that private citizens provide a microphone for the man who advocates their destruction, or a
passkey for the burglar who seeks to rob them, or a knife for the murderer who wants to cut their throats.
Such is the state of one of today’s most crucial issues: political rights versus ‘economic rights.’
It’s either-or. One destroys the other. But there are, in fact, no ‘economic rights,’ no ‘collective rights,’
no ‘public-interest rights.’ The term ‘individual rights’ is a redundancy:
there is no other kind of rights and no one else to possess them.
Those who advocate laissez-faire capitalism are the only advocates of man’s rights.”
Rand, Ayn. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal . 1st. New York: Penguin Group, 1946.
Posted by: KC | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
It’s amazing to me that you lefties work so hard to justify taking MY hard earned money in the name of fairness. While there are more than a few trust fund babies out there, I am not one of them. I’ve gone to college, footed the bill myself I may add, and struggled my way to the top.
Posted by: DCArnett | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Obama ought to understand selfishness. He makes $4.2 million a year but has close relatives living in poverty.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Allison: Obama’s grandmother is still wedged under the bus where he threw her during his Gettysburg-like speech on race
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
If John F. Kennedy were living today he would not recognize the Democrat party as perverted as it has been perverted by people like his brother Teddy Kennedy. I am willing to bet that Bill and Hillary Clinton WILL NOT VOTE for Obama!! Clinton hates him!!
There are many educated conservatives on this website. I am proud of you all!! Pray for victory —McCain/Palin 2008!!!
Posted by: Colorado | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Do as I say, NOT as I do!!!!!
Hey Dems, when you give all your money to the government, I will be right behind you. Let’s get the big O to set the example and live a life of poverty. Let him turn over his assets to the government. I would follow him for life then.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
And don’t overlook that Obama distinguishes “middle class” from those who work for a living. This is consistent with his worldview: those who have, should not have, and must give to others so they can have. This entire monologue of his is rife with Marxist thinking. It’s astounding that this man is ahead in the polls.
Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Obama is a very demented or very ill informed individual. I believe the saying “rising tide raises all boats” was popularized by Reagan who dramatically cut taxes for everyone, mostly the rich. Top marginal rate went from 70% to 28% during his eight years in office and economy grew an average of 3.4% during Reagan’s tenure. We cannot afford the huge recession that would be brought on by raising top marginal tax rates to 39%. The rich already pay the greatest share of the government’s budget, while the poor pay no taxes. A tax cut for someone paying no taxes is called WELFARE!
Posted by: JD | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.
– Frederic Bastiat
Posted by: dc | October 31, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Posted by: Unselfish: regarding Powell.
I have this gut feel that he endorsed Obama b/c the Dems want to try those involved in the Iraq war for war crimes. Maybe I’m nuts, but they’ve been discussing the possibility off an on on NPR for the last 3 months (mainly of there being arrests if those in the admin were abroad). Just the other day, a NZ university hosted Condi Rice, and a throng of students pursued Rice to arrest her for war crimes (there was a $ reward involved). Perhaps that’s why Scott McClellan endorsed him as well.
Maybe I’m waay off the mark, but I was wondering …
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I’ve got news for a lot of you BONEHEAD Democrats. According to 2007 IRS data, the TOP 5% are those that EARN $145,283 or ABOVE.
That is why the amount that Obama/Biden and now Richardson keeps talking about who are going to be taxed keeps dropping lower and lower, now down to $150,000 per the Biden Gaffe/Admission., (where is Biden, they are hiding him…)
You’ve been conned in the biggest con there is.
Posted by: Glubber | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
If you haven’t, please read Ayn Rand’s book, The Virtue of Selfishness. Then you can decide for youself if Obama is a socialist.
Posted by: Ragnar808 | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Personally, I’m looking forward to Obama winning. I’ve been working, saving, paying my bills, and generally being “selfish” for far too long. Once he wins and gets his economic policies in place, I plan to quit being so selfish.
Instead, I’m going to quit my job, default on my mortgage, ignore my credit card bills, go on welfare, and let the rest of you feel generous and charitable by taking care of me! That’s the new American Dream, right?
Posted by: Dar | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
If you are under 30 and not an easily swayed, doe-eyed, ignorant liberal you have no heart :), if you are over 30 and not a savvy, well educated, informed Conservative you have no brain :).
My corillary is, if you are under 30 and vote you are a minority (only 10%), if you are over 30 and vote you are a majority (more than 40%).
Wow! I wish youth was not wasted on the young!
Posted by: pclay3 | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Lily, please take a class in Economics 101 before posting again. So it’s bad for Americans when rich people put their money in the market? Do you happen to have a 401K or IRA? Do you work for a publicly traded company? Do you buy products from publicly traded companies? Well then — you are a beneficiary of those evil, greedy rich people putting their money in the market! I’ll tell you what, the money rich people put into the free market does a hell of a lot more for the American people than the money they pay in taxes. For one thing it does not lead to the loss of our freedoms. What does the government do with your money? They buy votes. BTW, I have degrees in Mathematics, Economics and Business so I’m not throwing rocks from a glass house.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Hey folks stating that we don’t get it and this is only for people making 250k or more. That number has gone down to 150k already according to Biden. This is a moveable number and the concern here is not over the number 250k or more, it’s the idea behind it. What will he do when 250k is too high? You guessed it, he will go down to the $40k’s, he already approved additional taxes on that income.
What you have to realize is that the gov’t collects about 19% in taxes as a relation to GDP. Every time taxes are lowered, GDP rises and every time they are increased it shrinks. 19% of a bigger pie is more money for the gov’t any way you slice it. So, if he really wants more money and does not want to punish people with higer taxes, tell me why he is raising taxes? Tell me the one time in history that an increase in taxes has lead to economic prosperity. Look it up, no time exists.
Posted by: jc | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
NEWSFLASH: All INTERESTS ARE SELF-INTERESTS
As such, all choices to pay or not pay taxes are out of “selfish-ness” as each individual is looking to satisfy something from within by which a choice is made
Obama is an idiot calling it “selfish”; of course it is, no person wants to pay for another person’s irresponsible behavior; a person who is not taking ownership of the myriad of choices made which created the life he or she is living
It’s in an individual’s self-interest, thus selfishness, to act on his or her own behalf toward self-reliance, self-governance and independence
This is why Democrats are awful people, they do not inherently assimilate FREEDOM & CHOICE from within by which to extend to others
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Obama is going to take away Bush’s tax cut so how is it that I am not going to be taxed more?
Posted by: dianeremax | October 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Looks like the slanderers and racists are out in record numbers today…
Funny thing is that I bet most of you would do better under Obama’s tax plan than McCain’s. Interesting to see so many people vote against their own self interests.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
At least he’s admitting that he wants to take my money so his beneficiaries can buy a new car and a boat. I already can’t afford a new car or a boat. Figures that he thinks people who work for a living are not worthy to keep the fruit of our labor, so freeloaders can buy new cars and boats.
Socialist pig.
Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“Ask not what your country can do for you, or what you can do for your country, but what you can do for me.”
Posted by: Steve I | October 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I do not want to pay higher taxes and you are calling me selfish….you are sure free with others money, especially when your own half brother lives in a shack , your aunt lives in a slum dwelling in South Boston and you have not gone back to even offer a word of encouragement or money for a matter of fact and you want to call me selfish, you hypocrite. This is the number one reason I choose to vote against you. All you offer me as a citizen for the so-called product you and your Socialistic/Marxist cronies is higher prices, not better services, not better government, and definitely not more control over my individuality which I enjoy.
This is America, a Republic where opportunities are equal, one just has to find them for ones skill set. Not the land of entitlement which is a copy of the socialistic governments that have been subsidized by America since WWII, you seem to pattern your beliefs on. They enjoy whatever they have because of our demand for products, services and our benevolence in rebuilding them after WWII. Your mantra is based on power and control not benevolence, which you hope to use as the hook in selling yourself to the unknowing during this election.
So on November 4th I will cast my vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin
Posted by: Smokey | October 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Has it ever occurred to a rich person that all of their “hard-earned” wealth can be attributed to all the crap they have sold to the poor person. Poor people have made rich people wealthy…the ole’ trickle up theory I’d say.
I admire a rich person who is satisfied that their wealth is contributing to a healthy economy…and making the country a better place…fostering a sense of peace throughout the nation.
How else do we expect to maintain roads, schools, national parks, developmentally disabled people’s care, senior citizen’s care, etc?
Greed is ugly and the growing gap between rich and poor is beginning to create some ugly tension in the masses. Look in the history books to see just how ugly things can get when the gap grows too large.
Posted by: Judy Green | October 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Bored on the Right: Why can’t you grasp that Obama’s half-brother isn’t living in squalor? Let me repeat: “I have a good life. It’s not like I live in the gutter.” “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.” “I don’t want to look to him for help, I want to achieve things for myself.” Those are direct quotes from his half-brother from three different sources.
If his half-brother was dying of starvation and Obama knew and hadn’t even attempted to help him, you might have a point. But that’s just not how it is. Obama’s half-brother is happy, healthy, and doesn’t want a thing from Obama. Get over it.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Obama is such a jerk and liar. His mother was worried about medical expenses, right. Truth is: She was diagnosed with indigestion in Jakarta, Indonesia, months later she went to Hawaii and was told that she had cancer. Obama says that he made a big mistake by not visiting her at side when she was dying. He was making good money and was in court reprenting ACORN the week she died. He could have eased her worries by helping with her bills. BTW she just happened to have a phd and couldn’t afford health care….Hmmm?
Posted by: Carroll | October 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Everyone in the USA has access to college and healthcare. This man is trying to rewrite the USA. You can’t make a poor man rich by making a rich man poor. We all have the same opportunities. If people want to be socialist and spread the wealth, how bout spreading it in Europe..not here. I don’t want Obama and any of his ideas. I wish he would just go away.
Posted by: Linda | October 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
The majority here have expressed my sentiments, in volume, and in concert. Beyond that, it is my hope that in addition to undecided voters, some planning to vote “smoke and mirrors”, will see through gimmickratic plans and opt in favor of a vote for an improved establishment.
Check it out: “Ecclesiastes 10-2″
Posted by: j. wayne | October 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Aengil: Please explain how you know so much about Obama’s family?
Posted by: dianeremax | October 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
YOU CHOOSE:
Economic Growth
or
Redistribution of Income.
…what’s in your wallet?
Posted by: freemkt | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
He made 4.2 million and gave 1.0% to charity.
The best way to determine what a person will do in the future is to look at his past.
Obama’s tradition of stiffing “the least of these” goes back as far as the tax records he has released to date.
His stance on abortion further substanciates the fact that he has conformed himself to this world.
He is a Democrat first and a Christian later.
Posted by: Abe Noxious | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I don’t get it. WHen has it become evil to become a success? WHen has it become evil to want to get what you have EARNED? Everybody is on a level playing field. My Parents weren’t rich. I lived at home and worked 35 hours a week to go to colloge. I went to a State school, I bought my books, I paid for my car, I paid rent, I paid Insurance. Did I go out a lot? No. Did I party down? No. Did I get to go to Harvard on someelse’s dime. NO.
THe money I earn is my money. It is not selfesh to want to keep it, by God I earned it.
Taxes foir services yes. Taxes to be handed out to someone els NO! Let them earn it like I did.
Posted by: R. P. Foster | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I cast my vote today against Marxism!
It felt good, but I mourn today for all of the idiots who are voting FOR Marxism, without realizing what they’re voting for — all for the mantra of “Change” or shouts of “Yes we can”.
I can take 10 points out of the Communist Manifesto and say them back to a typical “moderate” Obama voter, not tell them where I got them, and 9 out of 10 would say it’s a bad idea! Of course, I exclude the dyed in the wool Socialists, like Comrade Pelosi and company. People know not what they vote for.
Get it people, BUSH isn’t running anymore! You can drop it now.
The communists will have to pry my money out of my cold dead hands before I’ll agree to redistribute it. It makes me “SELFISH” in their eyes, and SO BE IT!!!
Posted by: MikeS | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Bored on the Right
You must be bored to say that it was Gates who was in charge of economy. Man, go check numerous places for comparison between McCain’s and Obama’s plans. Anyone making under 250K benefits under Obama and national debt increases under McCain. It is the fact that was proven many many times. You make no sense because what you are saying has been shown to be false many times. Open your eyes. Reagan never tried to fix the progressive tax system, McCain supported it in 2000 and Alaskan beaty-queen is charging oil compnaies high tax to redistribute wealth. You want to find a socialist – see Sarah Palin, on TV. What are you talking about?
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I don’t care if this is only for people making $250K, or $150K, or whatever it’s gone down to now. It’s the principle of the thing. Once you concede that the fruits of anyone’s labor is the government’s to divvy up to each according to their need, then you condemn us all to live as sacrificial animals to the welfare state.
Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Hey Judy Green:
A poor person NEVER gave me a job.
Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Weird, how some republicans here are so ignorant and angry…of course, they are loosing the power grip. The old world of bully power is slipping away.
But hey, it is not and never been in American culture to SHARE. That is why the country is in such a mess today. And, guess what, it’s going to get even worse if you will not let go of your useless anger, and learn to SHARE instead of giving your hard earned money away to corrupt bankers and CEO’s who, as selfish as you are, run away with them. I am laughing at you people, because i see changes coming.
OBAMA all the way!!!
Posted by: valtonik | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
The top 5% already pay 60% of the income taxes in this country (IRS website). Do the calculatins. Exxon Mobile pays more in taxes than the bottom 50% of our citizens (read their earnings statement and do the calculations). Obama only focuses on “Profits”. He wants to bite the hands that feed us. He is a scary, scary man.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
There are 2 things I don’t understand, someone, especially Dems explain to me:
1. Obama said he’ll take care of you by giving you a $500/individual or $1000/family, but before he can do that, he asks you to give him the money to run his campaign. How much did you give him to get $500 or $1000 back?
2. You Dems always complaint about Corp CEO making millions per year but I haven’t heard anything about the Hollywood actors/actreses making millions per movie, what say you?
Posted by: jay | October 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Obama is clueless about what a struggle it is to build or run a business.
Posted by: Dawn | October 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Sorry Obama, but as a self employed business man, you aren’t going to get anymore money from me than the gov’t is already getting. That’s just the way it is. I’m not going to work my tail off just to turn around and give you more taxmoney to hand out to the leisure crowd left that is your primary voting base. I don’t let the Obamas of the world dictate to me on what I should pay in taxes.
Posted by: Hard Working Man | October 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
It may be coming time for Atlas to shrug baby. If Obama gets elected, I know my little piece of Atlas is going to shrug. I won’t be supporting a socialist super state. “Paying taxes is Patriotic.” If you don’t want to pay more taxes, you’re “selfish.” This is leftist newspeak at its worst. This guy is dangerous.
Posted by: Benny | October 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Obama has become a master of this technique. He did not argue that he is not a socialist. He ridiculed the idea by saying that people call him a communist because he shared his toys in kindergarten is one recent example of this.
Now we have Obama ridiculing people who do not like paying taxes by pointing at them and saying that they are selfish.
I’ll have do admit that use of ridicule is brilliant. Most people just see it as funny. They fail to see it for what it really is. They fail to see that it is way of not having to defend their position. It is brilliant but it also very dangerous.
Posted by: Ifticar | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Obama is not hitting Rand, he never read her as he was too busy reading Saul Alinsky. Had he read Rand he would have realized that he and his Democrat colleagues are a bunch of selfish, power-hungry, nuts with no virtues.
Posted by: Jaime | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged was once required reading in the US. It still ought to be — to at least comptete with the mindless propogandist literature of the left. If you have not read it, please do. You may disagree with much of what Rand espouses, but consider the interesting premise of the novel — what if the people who create the new businesses, the people who invent new technologies, what if they went on strike? What if they say “No more, we refuse”? To the socialist mind, this is inconceivable, and to the extent it is conceivable their reaction would be to force businesses to stay open, to force people to create and to enforce the ideas of a right to work, a right to a car, and so many other rights that are not really rights. If Obama is elected, we may see Atlas shrug before our eyes, and this may be what we need to end the utopian experiment of Ayers and Obama.
Posted by: Andy | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Statistically, when taxes go up, charitable giving declines – and visa-versa. I would rather determine where I want to donate my money instead of the government which has proven itself completely incapable of actually caring for people.
Posted by: uncisu | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Arthur Brooks, economist and Univ of Syracuse Prof, studied charity/donations and discovered that … conservative-headed households donate several times more than liberal-headed households …
Mr. Brooks calls it a “bitter irony” that those favoring income redistribution are not doing much redistributing from their own bank accounts.
“In essence, for many Americans, political opinions are a substitute for personal checks,” Mr. Brooks writes.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Hey Barry, it’s “selfish” not to serve in the military during time of war, to go to Ivy leagues schools on the taxpayer dime and to hide behind a shroud of secrecy regarding your birth certificate and the kind of real company you keep…Thank god we have Harriet ‘Harry’ Reid and General Pelosy to keep you honest…Selfish is taking the oath of office to protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, then reneging on that same oath by legislatively perverting our Constitutional inheritance.
Posted by: IraqWarVeteran | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
beancounter — excellent logic — so if the Bush administration is socialist we shouldn’t complain about Obama being more socialist? You’re a moron. Of course we don’t like higher taxes and socialist government regardless of whether a republican or a democrat is imposing them.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
To whoever wrote this one:
“Yes, precisely. You are your brothers’ keeper. We exist, so the MORAL and UNSELFISH thing for you to do is live on less and give us more. That way you have what you NEED, but we have what we NEED too.
Not everybody is lucky to have a job — some people can’t work or don’t work. It’s none of your business why, just that if they don’t, or don’t earn as much as you, then we need to “distribute” so there is equality.”
Oh i see, it is none of my business why i labor & you don’t, WELL it is none of yr business looking in my wallet. How about we split this country down the middle: Dems(tax takers)on the left side, and Repubs (tax payers)on the right. Oh wait, WHO will work to feed those on the left? Remember the Ant & the Cricket tale?
Posted by: can't believe what i read | October 31, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I can’t wait till Obama gets in office and starts setting things straight. Its not fair that rich people have so much money and other people don’t have as much.
Take their money Barrack. Take their money and give it to people that need it!
Vote Obama 08! Vote for him taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor!
Posted by: justicetime | October 31, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
i loath him
Posted by: linda | October 31, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
dianeremax: “Aengil: Please explain how you know so much about Obama’s family?”
It’s called ‘research’. I looked for interviews with George Obama, I found them, I read them.
I find that works much better than relying on what other people think about something they read about what someone thought about something they misread about Obama’s half-brother.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Funny how virtually none of these posts suggests that McCain policies are better than Obama policies. Just that Obama is a bad person. Not a winning tactic.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
For all you people who say you work so hard and so many hours but can’t make ends meet, what in the world are you doing reading blogs and taking time to post replies to them? Why do you even have internet?
Posted by: Barry | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
And while we’re at it, where are the line by line proposals of how GOVERNMENT is going to cut THEIR costs??? Why should we all have to bear the brunt of this when the government is so out of control on their spending? I want to see a candidate who can go through the federal budget and find ways to make it work. Don’t tell me there are no cuts that can be made there.
Posted by: Deana | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
OBAMA IS THE SECOND BIGGEST SCAM TO BE PERPETRATED ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SECOND ONLY TO MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING ALA AL GORE.
Posted by: bob | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Obama sure has a lot of promises, but never actually give solutions. He keeps saying that when he is elected, he will let us know…
Obama is full of crap. He is a major BS’er and wouldn’t know his head from a tax loop hole
Posted by: jthornto | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Obama sure has a lot of promises, but never actually give solutions. He keeps saying that when he is elected, he will let us know…
Obama is full of crap.
Posted by: jthornto | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Obama’s tax plan is simple to understand.
The democrats (Obama) DEMAND I help the poor.
The republicans (McCain) give me the opportunity to help the poor.
It’s a matter of freedom of choice. Obama wants to take away my freedom to choose and quite a few other freedoms as well.
Obama wants to make me his financial slave. A slave is a slave whether it be in finacial or physical form. I refuse to be Obama’s slave now or ever.
The democrats are nothing more than the party of entitlements where the republicans are the party of opportunities.
Give a man a fish to eat every day and he becomes dependant on you. Teach him to fish and he becomes reliant on himself.
Obama wants you to be dependant on him. His faithful followers agree, I DO NOT!
Posted by: JoesPlumbingCustomer | October 31, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
so i am selfish to want what I’ve worked so hard to earn? I am selfish because I don’t believe a 10% increase in taxes on just certain people is fair?
They already pay 30+ % why should they pay an added chunk ?
How about we fix loopholes, and keep taxes the same (or decrease them)….. BTW, both plans would net me a reduction in taxes, but Robin Hood is BS.
Posted by: todd | October 31, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I’m not rich, I’m not poor, I’m middle class. I don’t believe that the “rich” wanting to keep the money that is theirs (I DON’T CARE IF THE INHERITED IT OR EARNED IT THROUGH WORK) is selfish.
Why demonize someone because that don’t want to share what is rightfully theirs. Giving something that you own to help someone else is called charity. Forced giving to someone else is socialism.
Why doesn’t Obama lead by example and “give” to his brother in the Kenyan slum, and the Aunt living in poverty in Boston…oh, wait…he wants US to do that!
Posted by: Hapner | October 31, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
valtonik — bully power? You want to see bully power talk to someone from North Korea (oh wait, you can’t — they’re in political prisons) or talk to someone who grew up in Communist Russia or take your pick of socialist/communist regimes. Exactly how have you been bullied by Bush or any other Republican. Here’s a basic concept of power and bullying — someone who gives you something has the power to take it away. So when we’re all on the dole, guess what will happen if you don’t toe the line? I knew a guy who grew up in Communist Russia. If you said something against the government the joke was “Have you paid your taxes?” Meaning that the government would “find” some unpaid taxes and you would go to jail. Don’t think that can happen? Ask Joe the Plumber.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
hey voltonick
A Poor person gave me a job…when I worked for the developmentally disabled….thank god taxes helped pay for thier care!
Posted by: Judy Green | October 31, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Aengil, you write that Obama’s brother said this: “I don’t want to look to him for help, I want to achieve things for myself.”
If that’s true, then Obama’s brother is very clearly a Republican, and I would vote for an Obama with those policies. You betcha!
But seriously, of course, his brother’s own policy is opposite of Barack Obama’s which is that you must look to him for help and should not be allowed to achieve them on your own.
Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
You liberals just don’t get it. It ain’t your money. When you all get some money, you don’t give to charity…Look at Biden…3 million dollars in the last 10 years and he gave a whopping 3k to charity…I don’t make even close to the 120k, 150k, 200k or 250k but I know I still pay taxes and under Oblahbla, I will even pay more to have it given to people that don’t want to work…
Posted by: Greg Williams | October 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Rick -”Interesting to see so many people vote against their own self interests.”
And yet, we are somehow selfish.
Posted by: ian | October 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Valtonik,
First off, Americans are the most generous country on earth — remember the $ raised by Americans for the victims of Katrina, the Asian tsunami, African relief, the WTC tragedy. I could go on and on.
BTW — studies show that Republicans are more generous than Democrats.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
“I can’t wait till Obama gets in office and starts setting things straight. Its not fair that rich people have so much money and other people don’t have as much.
Take their money Barrack. Take their money and give it to people that need it!
Vote Obama 08! Vote for him taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor!”
Please leave our country ASAP. You don’t deserve to be here.
Posted by: jeff28 | October 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
George Orwell, in “Animal Farm”: Squealer consoles the animals, saying, “Do not imagine, comrades, that leadership is a pleasure. On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility.” “No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon” (could just as easily be Obama), “that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?” (you bunch of SELFISH animals!)
Posted by: Jim C in Aztec, NM | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
If this insane man is elected, I hope his “followers” have to get off their tax-free butts and go to work to pay my Social Security!
Posted by: Chukkal | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
“And Alaska we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.”
Sarah Palin – a socialist, worthy of Putin and Saudis.
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
How are we selfish if we have our money taken from us & aren’t given the opportunity to give our hard earned money to whom we please or see fit. I give & will continue to give money away to the people, organizations that I see fit. And Obama’s stupid analogy (he made at a rally the other day) of sharing his PB & J sandwich is retarded & wrong, the point is he chose to give it, the government will FORCE us to give our money to someone who did not work for it!
Posted by: joey | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
What Obama doesn’t understand is that this is the United States of America and everyone already has a chance! Taking from one and giving to another through government mandate is Socialism. I am one of many who makes over 250K but I slept on a mattress on the floor of my studio apartment with cockroaches running around to achieve my dream and never once did I ask for a government handout. I never thought I was being persecuted or I couldn’t achieve my dreams. The founding fathers gave me this opportunity and Obama want’s to take it away! Obama thinks they got it wrong! What a horrible person he is! If Obama is elected be ready for a silent revolution.
Posted by: lk | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Obama sounds like he is promising an socailistic Utopia. Hogwash. He is no savior of the world, and wanting to keep hard earned money is NOT selfish. Stealing it by using the government IS socialism/communism. Why doesn’t Obama start sharing his own dang wealth with his own family and leave everyone elses the heck alone? He is an awful man with even worse plans for our country. God help us.
Posted by: nur07 | October 31, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
To Linda:
I can’t believe you posted this. You’re so ignorant, I’m surprised you know how to work a computer. You poor bastard (and I don’t mean poor monetarily). “Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie! I want to sit on my fat ass while someone else gives me something.” You are absolutely pathetic and a waste of skin.
——————————
I can’t wait till Obama gets in office and starts setting things straight. Its not fair that rich people have so much money and other people don’t have as much.
Take their money Barrack. Take their money and give it to people that need it!
Vote Obama 08! Vote for him taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor!
——————————
Posted by: A Normal guy | October 31, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
We dummied our schools down to the lowest common demoninator and the result was we have the worst schools in the free world.
Now we want to dummy down the portion of the population that opens successful small business because it’s only fair that everyone share in that person’s gains.
Folks. Wake Up. The world is not fair. Work hard. Work smart. Take risks. The rewards will come your way. And we will build a much stronger society.
I am terrified of where we are going with all of this.
Posted by: Howard | October 31, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Bored on the Right: “his brother’s own policy is opposite of Barack Obama’s which is that you must look to him for help and should not be allowed to achieve them on your own.”
But that’s just not true. If I don’t work in America, I’m not going to do well whoever the President is. But the harder I work, the better I will do, regardless of the President. The basic principles aren’t being changed, much as people like to claim they are and yell ‘socialist/marxist/commie!’.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
ANYONE PAYING ATTENTION TO HOW OBAMA’S DEFINITION OF ‘RICH’ HAS COME DOWN FROM HIS PREVIOUSLY-STATED 1 MILLION/YR TO JOE BIDEN’S $150k/YR (LAST WEEK)? WOW, WHO KNEW! My husband and I worked our BUTTS off, got educations, started a business and spent and saved wisely. Did NOT have kids until we could afford them and lived within our means. THAT is the way you achieve ‘THE AMERICAN DREAM’. Obama wants to penalize those who do what we did and restribute OUR money to those who for the most part, make STUPID DECISIONS and don’t achieve thru their own stupidity or choices. Guess what, you want to take more of MY MONEY, you will see OUR BUSINESS cut back on the goods/services/employees of those ‘MIDDLE CLASS’ he pretends to want to help. The landscapers/painters/plumbers/etc.of this country. THEY WILL SUFFER because of it. There is no ‘magic pile of money’ lying around to replace the additional taxes HE WANTS TO TAKE. The AMT already takes away ALL THOSE LOOPHOLES the class-envy sheep keep wailing about. You hit the magic number and YOUR DEDUCTIONS ARE GONE, PERIOD. SMALL BUSINESSES are the ones creating the jobs in this country, SO lets penalize them MORE and see what happens. UNLESS YOU REDUCE THE THE CORPORATE TAX RATE in the US, more corportations will move overseas. WAKE UP PEOPLE! When the ‘rich’ have been squeezed dry, the OBAMAS AND PELOSIS of this country will come down the ladder to YOU!
Posted by: JEAN | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Arthur Brooks, economist and Univ of Syracuse Prof, studied charity/donations and discovered that … conservative-headed households donate several times more than liberal-headed households …
Mr. Brooks calls it a “bitter irony” that those favoring income redistribution are not doing much redistributing from their own bank accounts.
“In essence, for many Americans, political opinions are a substitute for personal checks,” Mr. Brooks writes.
This is exactly right.
Google the Phylanthropy catalog.
You will see that in 2004 and 2000. If your state voted democrate in the presidential elections. Your state had a zero percent chance of being in the top half of states in regards to charitible giving per capita as a percent of income.
I think the only exception was new your was ranked #26 right after 9/11 or something like that?
Liberals are only generous with other peoples money. Heck, compare Joe Biden’s charitable giving over Palin’s. It’s amazing.
Posted by: Mr. Kelly | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
To Linda who said “it’s not fair that rich people have so much money…” Are you kidding me? Do you think that rich people just happened upon their money, and poor, unlucky you didn’t? You don’t think that most rich people have worked their rear ends off for what they have? I bust mine all week long and am fairly well off as a result. Guess what, the people in my firm who make more than I do also work even harder than I do. And after all my hard work and the money I earn as a result, don’t you think I should be the one who decides where that money goes and not the government (and I can assure you I give plenty to charity – both time and dollars). Quit moaning and go to work.
Posted by: Marc | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Selfishness is not moral, but it’s not immoral, either; it’s amoral. If the argument is based upon morality, I don’t see how you get to where theft is moral, regardless of who the wealth winds up with after it’s stolen. Theft is taking something that doesn’t belong to you by stealth or by force. In the Government’s case, it’s by force, since if you don’t pay their imposed taxes (followed by fines and penalties), they will get around to taking it by force eventually. It’s good to give to the poor, but not to force someone else to give or to give someone else’s property. Aren’t children taught that at grade school age anymore?
Short of protest or revolution, there’s not much we as citizens can do to stop whatever Congress and the Admin decide to do, but anyone who claims that government is moral in taxing from “The Rich” to give to “The Poor” is either a fool or a liar.
Posted by: Quuzlfut | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
I will decide who I donate to and how much I donate. I do not need this silly freak to do that for me in his name or in the name of the US Government.
Posted by: R Thompson | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
I don’t know about you people but I always send the IRS twice as much that is asked of me come tax time. I earn a good living in my profession so I can afford to give a little more into the system to help the less fortunate.
I’m finally glad to see a candidate mandate people well off pay more into the system and I’m even more ecstatic so many people are seeing things my way and voting Obama so that he can make things right for fairness’s sake.
Posted by: wait_a_second | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Republicans. Both sides need to put all of the b.s. aside and look at the fundamentals we percieve through the notion of sports. Does the team that has a bunch of “look at me” individuals prevail in any type of sport in any country? NO! Its always a collective effort from individuals who play together for the same common goal. Not, having some people say I’m right and you are wrong. Its everyone saying “let’s make the best of what we have together.” We don’t need a bunch of T.O.’s thinking you deserve more than everyone else on the team(in the country). Quit fluffing your own pillow. You’re setting yourself up for a hard fall because you only care about you! Money can buy you everything for awhile, but guess what? it’ll run out..
Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Obama from his “Temple Mount” speech in Denver – “… I am my brother’s keeper..”
HARDLY….
Well, we don’t see him aiding his poor half brother in Kenya living in a hut on $1.00 a month. And now, revalations from the UK Media (not the U.S. media)that Obama’s aunt is living in a run-down Boston slum!
Geeeezz – and he has the utter nerve to call us hard-working Americans – SELFISH!!!
Likewise – Mr Biden is HARDLY a philantrophist himself! Good grief – his tithing amounts to 1/10 of a PENNY per dollar.
Sure – these con artists want to RIP US OFF, STEALING OU MONEY for their schemes.
People – DO NOT VOTE for these Marxists!
Posted by: jay | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
So let’s just vote for McCain…let the free market go..sell our corporations to China…and all start working in Chinese-owned sweatshops right here in our own country.
That is what a vote for McCain has to offer!!
Posted by: Judy Green | October 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
DEE, you are a SEMINAR poster, you are no life-long Republican…a true Republican could not abandon the memory of 40,000,000 unborn Americans whose deaths Obama is willing to tolerate. After all, he would not want his daughter(s) “punished” with a baby…Obama is a liar and an amoral automaton which has ONE goal…power. With secret funding from parasites like George Soros and open support by the mass media and Hollywood he has proven one thing: that you can fool all of the people some of the time~ I will keep my powder dry.
Posted by: USAF Vet | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
First of all I want to thank brave guys like Jake Tapper (although it is too late) for going against the tide of the Gestapo (MSM and Liberal Elites) to present an objective view of Obama.
Fear not all, after 4 years of the triumvirate (Obama, Reid, Pelosi) the country will be down the toilet bowl. That will give Newt Gingrich enough time to plan a takeover in 2012.
Posted by: Ron | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Remind me again how much Barrack and Michelle gave to charity. It was on their income tax returns. He’s one to talk.
Posted by: Max | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
This guy leans communist! I am dead serious and it is truly scary to think people are willingly going towards this nightmare.
Posted by: NOBAMA! | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Obama Hood: (def. )Candidate for President who want to steal from the productive and give to the inept.
My wife was going to enter the work force this coming year after her degree is finished and her income would push us to above the mark for Obama’s tax plan. After the 15% increase over what I pay now, she will only net $15,000 for her degreed position and effort at work for 40-50 hours per week.
Now, we are simply going to let her be a stay at home mom and cut $15,000 out of our yearly budget by firing our lawncare company and cutting our own grass, cutting our dining out from the $500 per month now for my family of 4 to around $100 and cutting the amount of charitable donations I currently give (10% to my church, and around 5% to various food banks, St. Vincents DePaul, etc.) Also, rather than give our outgrown cloths from our kids to Goodwill and taking the tax deduction, now my wife will be organizing yard sales.
So, how will the extra $500-1000 the lawn care company, the waitstaff and restauranteurs receive plus the reductions in donations to charities that feed and clothe the hungry and homelss lose, balance out?
Nothing the government does every outperforms what the capitalist society does without intervention.
Vote Against OBAMAHOOD and his merry gand of liberal thieves.
Posted by: perrill | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Hmm. Let’s see. ‘Spread the wealth’, as opposed to ‘Virtue of Selfish.’ Now, if news reports are correct his brother lives in shanty-town and his other grandmother, named Sarah, lives in government housing. He and his wife have given us the penultimate of Ayn Rand’s virtue…He won’t even try to assist his closest living relatives so how is he going to help me? So much for compassion. So much for leading by example…oh, I almost forgot. “Sick Billy” Ayers (not to be confused with the “Slick Willie”) taught him to “not do as I do but do as I say.” Soon, we will all be doing as BO and his supporters say or we’ll be investigated by rogue government workers, put off of airplanes, shunned like reporters and television stations, and arrested by Secret Service agents. What a wonderful future BO is.
Patrick Henry once said, “I smell a rat” And walked out. Deodorant anyone?
Posted by: Buddy in Huntsville | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Stop spending!! That is a tax increase!!
Posted by: jd | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
As soon as Bushes Taxes cuts expire in 2010 and Obama’s tax increases merge …. the whole country will be hurting. I am a single mom 3 kids 1 in college helped by the prepaid college fun and florida’s Bright Futures plan. I make 32K a year and I DO NOT WANT A WELFARE CHECK! I don’t want money from those who have made it…it is not the American way. My son is studying to be an electrical engineer and he deserves to keep every dime of the money he will earn one day. There are so many opportunities for kids to go to college on scholar ships and grants. We have so much here compared to any where else in the world. Obama only inspires the idea of so many …that this country OWES THEM. I wonder what will happen when all the distribution of wealth checks are spent … hmmm I know everyone will have their hand out for more. Wake up America…from a single undermiddle class citizen who is happy to live in America and happy to have what I have because I earned it. It’s not much but Dang I am proud!! I don’t worry about “SNACKS” like the woman in Obama’s infomercial… I have taught my kids to go to college and make something better of themselves then I did…
Posted by: valerie | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
My kids are 11 and 9. They are both excellent stuents and identified as gifted. They talk about what they want to be when they grow up. I can’t believe it, but I’m stearing them away from medicine, law, etc. The medical field will be a disaster with a government controlled system, the number of doctors is already on the decline. If Obama is President they will not be able to keep what they make in their fields. Being a great student, becoming a success, earning a good living, will mean nothing if Obama becomes president. We will live in an obamanation. Maybe we’ll move to Australia.
Posted by: Kate | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Obama won’t pay for his half brother or aunt… he wants YOU to pay for it… watch out…lock your doors …and hide your money… cause he’s coming after all of you..
m
Posted by: michael Paraskevas | October 31, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Lets take money from the rich so we can take care of Obama’s grandmother and brother who seem to be living in abject poverty. Now is the big mouth wont take care of his family are you really dumb enough to think he will take car of you Mr. & Mrs Cracker?
Remember paying taxes is patriotic.
Look folk I can understand the black population and the homless voting for Obama but you middle of the roaders and smart college kids are going to get you asses burned if that joker gets in. Obama and Pelosi will tap dance all over your check book.
Posted by: RIP | October 31, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
No, the Soviet system didn’t work, so what. The concept of SHARING goes well beyond any known system.
American-lead system also didn’t work- it collapsed just as USSR did. So, Soviet-style socialism didn’t work, and American style capitalism also doesn’t work – it left tens of millions of people broke. Admit it- it doesn’t work!
Obama proposes the best of both worlds, 21st. century style- progressive and optimistic. Take it, or find yourself moving backwards.
Posted by: valtonik | October 31, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Nice comments. You so called conservatives go right ahead and keep carrying water for your wealthy overlords. I am sure they will remember you at bonus time this year. The biggest lie the republicans ever sold this country was that they are looking out for the middle class. You are nothing to them but fodder. You dance like monkees when they make you fear each other in the middle class. All the while you believe you can make it to the big time, while they continualy rig the game to keep you out. And for their troubles you continue to hate and spit on and fear the little guy.
Posted by: bigduke | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Selfish, working, Republican and proud of it!
Posted by: m | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
After reading all these comments I am convinced that Obama will NOT be the next POTUS but then I realize there are so many brainwashed zombies of Obama that just don’t get it. If they all reasoned like us McCain/Palin would take all 50 states, or is it 57 like Obama said????
Hang in there fellow conservatives, get out there & vote like our very lives & the lives of our children depend on it because you know what? IT DOES!!
Posted by: Colorado | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
this will all end badly
Posted by: the french | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Assuming the number is actually $250k, which today it’s evidently down to $120k, here’s an easy math problem.
If a man making $249k has to pay 25% in taxes, his take-home pay = $186,750.
If a man making only $1k more than that ($250k) has to pay 35% in taxes, his take-home pay = $162,500.
So for earning just $1,000 more per year, he has to live off $24,250 LESS than the first man.
That’s $24,250 that he could have donated to the charity of his choice.
Shame on Barack Obama for his ridiculous plans.
Posted by: Bored on the Right | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
You ALL should just be ashamed of yourselves.
Because those against McCain will be saying the same things you all have to say about Obama. It’s an endless, meaningless cycle.
Ultimately, one of these candidates will be president, fight your battles at the election polls by voting. This TUESDAY!
And may the best man win.
But commenting on this really isn’t going to do much good, except show others how immature you truly are… and quite frankly, it scares me that you all are going to impact my economic future.
Posted by: poor college student | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
You ALL should just be ashamed of yourselves.
Because those against McCain will be saying the same things you all have to say about Obama. It’s an endless, meaningless cycle.
Ultimately, one of these candidates will be president, fight your battles at the election polls by voting. This TUESDAY!
And may the best man win.
But commenting on this really isn’t going to do much good, except show others how immature you truly are… and quite frankly, it scares me that you all are going to impact my economic future.
Posted by: poor college student | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“Is Obama being selfish, or something else, when he fails to extend a hand to his aunt, who has lived for years in a housing project in South Boston?”
*************
He’s being “something else”…a hypocrite.
Posted by: Ignatz Horowitz | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Can’t wait for the dems to re-instate the draft which now includes women.
Obama has ALL the names, addresses and phone numbers of everyone that gave him money. You had to be over 18 to give so that makes you eligable for his new draft. All of Obama’s supporters are going to be drafted and sent to die for him.
Now all those women that were fainting at his feet will be dying for his cause when he tries to play Command-in Chief”
This is going to be sooooo gooood!
Posted by: Laughing Policeman | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
How does a senator afford 7 houses and $300,000 dresses for his trophy wife?
Do Senator’s really make that much money?
McCain is a slippery and scary man…and Palin …don’t get me started!!!
Posted by: judy Green | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I love you mr jake tapper. Are you married?
Posted by: Touchet | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
All I know is that my is being offshored to either India, Brazil or Vietnam.
Looks like I wont have to worry about taxes next year as I will have no income.
I can’t wait to start receiving food stamps and welfare. Does anyone know if government cheese is like cheddar or velveta?
Posted by: Joe the Computer Programmer | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Most Americans, like myself, work hard to give their children a better life… we sacrifice & save for them… My wife’s parent left Russia when she was 10 to come to the U.S. – they left everything they had & prospered in the great country… Though far from perfect there’s no better place in the world than the U.S. – Those who vote for Obama are unwittingly asking to turn the U.S. into Cuba… Is this what you want for your children? Please spit on Obama’s sick $1000 bribe & vote McCain…
Posted by: Tony | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Does his meaning of selfishness pertain to feeding and housing his third world non citizen aunt in Boston. Selfishness is bums and welfare brood sows laying on their arse and drawing money from taxpayers.
Posted by: Greg Webber | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Hey Judy Green… Go open your own company, create your own job, and you will never need to worry about it getting “Shipped” to China. Oh thats right. It is someone elses responsibility to give you a job. Then once you have it, it is yours, and it should never be “Shipped” to China. If it is yours, then keep it here yourself. I know this concept is way over your socialist head!
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
FormerUSSR — Although I don’t agree with most of your other statements, the one about corporations leaving the US isn’t really right…..most corporations are already global so, in essence, they can “leave” the US whenever they want. Just move operations somewhere else.
One other thing, why hasn’t anyone talked aobut the education needed for some of these “new” jobs? Wonder why foregin automakers are kicking our butts? One word…..math and science training.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“it scares me that you all are going to impact my economic future.”
*************
Sissy. Do something about it, if you’re so scared. Like vote for Ron Paul.
Sissy.
Posted by: Ignatz Horowitz | October 31, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Description of those who can work but want others to support them via their hard work and by paying higher taxes: ‘Freeloaders, bums’
Posted by: Flanders | October 31, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Sure, this probrably sounds good in the Communist Manifesto too.
Posted by: Mr. Middleclass | October 31, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Posted by: valtonik: “Obama proposes the best of both worlds, 21st. century style- progressive and optimistic. Take it, or find yourself moving backwards.”
Don’t forget the unicorns, dear valtonik!
I love the lack of specifics in your thinking …
Pelos(ki) – Obama – Reid: The Axis of Taxes
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Wow, what more evidence do we need to prove that Obama is a Marxist? Does he need to come out and say he has kidnapped John Galt?
Posted by: ouchpain | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Hey Judy Green, ur man OBAMA is the scary one, it would not suprise me if hes not the Antichrist…seriously!
Posted by: Glenn | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Well, that all sounds reasonable, all boats rising and all but it just isn’t believable from a candidate who has talked about how, “unfortunately,” the Court can’t manage to massively redistribute income. I simply don’t believe him.
Posted by: Abu Nudnik | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Fairtax!
Posted by: Travis | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
REMEMBER IN 2011, THE BUSH TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE AND CONGRESS AND bo WILL NOT MAKE THEM PERMANENT. SO REMEMBER FOLKS EVERYBODY’S TAXES WILL GO UP EVEN THE ONES MAKING $50,000!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The tax man cometh with the “great equalizer”, the estate tax, aka the death tax!!
When infrastructure is crumbling, schools are failing, medicare and social security are bankrupt, and un-regulated wall street crooks are robbing us blind, it becomes painfully obvious that the government left too much money on the table(ie. taxed too little)!!
Time for the boomers to come clean and pay the piper. Look for big changes in the limits and rates on what they can take and what you can leave!!
Posted by: M.B. | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
rick — honestly, come clean with us — you’re really an Obama campaign worker making $12/hour, right?
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Judy,
McCain doesn’t own the 7 houses. His wife does. Her family earned the money through work and sacrifice, not through government handouts.
Where did Obama get his money?
Posted by: Bert | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Obama supporters please read and pay attention Obama wesite quote “Eliminating Income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000. Barack Obama will eliminate all income taxation of seniors making less than $50,000. per year. This wiil eliminate taxes for 7 million saving them an average of $1,400. a year and will also mean that 27 million seniors will not need to file income tax returns at all ” NOw let me explain to you there are many wealthy seniors whose income comes from stock dividend and $50,000 income in stock dividends means you are sitting on multimillion dollar portfolios. And with Obamas plan he is going to eliminate these seniors(age 62+) of even having to file. Now you really believe he is the candidate for Middle Class Families? He put this plan out for the senior vote and it worked they are running to the polls in Florida .I would to if I were one of these wealthy senior retirees and Obama is telling me I don’t have to file. Did any of you actually read his tax proposals? And you all fell for him way to go. Guess who’s going to be carrying the tax burden for everyone. The middle class families. If you don’t believe me may I suggest you got to his website. Your Obama is a fraud pretending to be honest and saying we all have to pay taxes in the mean time lured wealthy seniors with a total free pass to pay no taxes.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
We would all feel a lot better if we had any faith at all in the gang of spendthrifts in Washington dolling it out willy nilly. God help us! They must be licking their chops!
Posted by: wat4 | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
To Greg, who said:
“No one is trying to take your money. Read newspapers. It is for people making 250K and more. The same as they paid in 90s. Are you telling me we had socialism in 90s? Are you deaf? It is 39% versus 35%!!! 4% difference makes the difference between socialism and capitalism???”
4% is not the difference. It’s taking the money, and then giving it to others who don’t even pay taxes. That’s a socialist idea. I say raise taxes all he wants, as long as it’s on everyone. Or cut for everyone WHO PAYS taxes to begin with. How do you cut taxes for someone who doesn’t even pay???
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
My husband and I started a small business 2 years ago. He works at least 70 hours a week and I work part-time (somebody has to raise the kids). If Obama becomes President, we have decided to close the business. Earning an extra 10 to 20 K after taxes is not worth it to us. Unfortunately, 4 men making between $12 to $20 an hour will lose their jobs. Welcome to Obama Nation!
Posted by: Andrea McDonnell | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Just send me the money. I will make
money as a result of Obama. But you could not pay me to vote for Him. He is a sheep in wolves clothing. I’m not stupid.
Posted by: packersue | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
To: Not like most of these republicans
You get it all wrong, we republicans want to pay low tax so we have more to donate to charities of our choice. We don’t need Obama to spend our money on useless causes and to people who are lazy. Hard work should be rewarded not punished. Obama should look at himself before he accuses others of being selfish; he should help his bro and aunt first.
Posted by: NB | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
What’s interesting is that Obama is not stating that wealthy people are selfish, as many of the people on this board are claiming.
His point is that the republicans are deriding policies that help the middle class.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Linda: I can’t wait till Obama gets in office and starts setting things straight. Its not fair that rich people have so much money and other people don’t have as much.
Take their money Barrack. Take their money and give it to people that need it!
——————
First his name is Barack…you’re voting for someone you don’t even know how to spell their name.
Second, you need to go live in Russia or Cuba or Venezuela where dictators rule. See how socialism really works then come back to America and still advocate what you said above.
There are no middle class in these countries, the government owns everything…and low and behold there is still the very rich and the very poor! In fact the poor in America are rich in comparison.
We have a Russian working at my company on a work visa…His mother works in Russia and makes $100 a month. He sends here a portion of his check to help her. So Socialism does not work you duffus…and Obama will not give you his money, nor the government’s money…he will just take away what everyone owns so it will be government controlled.
In a socialist society the very rich will remain and the very poor, but the middle class will vanish!
Posted by: JazzyKat | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
7 houses are not a problem with a multi-millionaire wife. Ask Kohn Kerry.
If you think McCain is slippery, what must you think of Chicago politics… and its love-child, Obama?
Posted by: Gift of the Maji | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
As far as I’m concerned, Obama has ingested way too much cocain and other drugs during his lifetime, that it has clouded his judgement and his ability to reason and to get real! Sorry, Mr. O, but the United States is a CAPITALIST country, and NOT SOCIALIST! I don’t want your American dream, I want the real American dream! You want to destroy the American economy, while McCain wants to build it! Bye-bye Obama!
Posted by: J0e6pack | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
What HYPACRACY is this Mr. Obama…You can’t even take care of members of your own family. Take care of your own before you jack up the taxes of the American people to pay for your socialist programs.
Posted by: Frank Citizen | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
“Globalisation, free and unfettered markets,…” Obama? What are you smoking? Obama has ALWAYS opposed these things! And his base does too! Anyone can lie to get elected!
Posted by: Abu Nudnik | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I don’t think alot of these Obama supporters really realize what it means to live in a socialistic society. EVERYTHING that is not a basic nessesity costs you a Fortune. That computer you are typing on. That xbox you play on. The TV you are watching. The cable, the cell phones. All of those things are not neccesities and are taxed so much that you basically have to be well off too aford it, or save up a really long time.
Think of that when you go to the polls. Think about all the luxuries you get living in a capitalistic market. Obama wants you to give those up so everyone can be equal.
Posted by: Darryl | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving.
CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN , and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food. America is stunned by the sharp contrast.
How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so ?
Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody cries when they sing, ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green.’
Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ants’ house where on the scene reporters film the group singing, ‘We shall overcome.’ Jesse then has the group kneel down to pray for the grasshopper’s sake.
Ted Kennedy and Barack Obama claim in an interview with Larry King that ants have gotten rich off the backs of the grasshoppers, and both call for an immediate tax hike on all ants to make them pay their fair share.
Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.
The ant is now fined for having failed to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.
Hillary gets her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a defamation suit against the ant, and the case is tried before a panel of federal judges that Bill Clinton appointed from a list of
single-parent welfare recipients.
The ant loses the case.
The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant’s former home, crumbles around
him because he doesn’t maintain it.
The ant has disappeared in the snow.
The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.
MORAL OF THE STO RY: Be careful how you vote in 2008
Posted by: dawn | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Poor college student — the only one to impact your finanacial future is YOU.
You prove the point of most of us here…that it’s always someone else’s fault that I’m in this situtation.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Almost wish this race could drag out a few weeks longer. I’m actually enjoying seeing the man who has been chosen to represent the Party of the People (isn’t that what the Democrats claim they are?) continue to presonally attack those people(Joe the Plumber, Residence of Pennsylvania, small businessmen, taxpayers)on a daily basis.
Keep it up Obama, don’t think you’ve insulted everyone just quite yet…a couple of more speeches! Gotta love Elitists! Brilliant, aren’t they?
Almost as brilliant as the people who who are mesmerized by their ‘magical’ words.
Posted by: Wow | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I bet if lefty jounalists warned more money you would feel differently. Get a real job.
Posted by: Tbird | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
He is so willing to take OUR money and GIVE it to someone else.
Yet his own track record of being CHARITABLE with his own money is DISGRACEFUL!!!
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
jay: “Well, we don’t see him aiding his poor half brother in Kenya living in a hut on $1.00 a month.”
Obama’s half-brother: “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Says it all really.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Selfishness as a virtue? Whatever you want to call it, I don’t have a problem with it.
I work hard for MY money. I have never requested government handouts or assistance. And even though I am paying into Social Security, there probably won’t be any left by the time I am eligible to start claiming it back.
It’s not the government’s job to decide how and when my hard-earned money will be turned over to the less fortunate. I didn’t tell these people to drop out of school. I didn’t tell these people to be lazy and just sit home all day instead of working. I didn’t tell these people to get knocked up at 15 and 16, and miss out on getting a proper education. Therefore, don’t tell me I’ll have to pay more taxes to make up for their deficiencies.
Obama’s plan to spread the wealth is just the start of a slippery slope into a socialist state. The fact that he’s blacklisting media outlets that question his policies (instead of doing “fluffball” interviews) is another very bad sign that our freedoms will be taken away if he gets into the White House.
Yet, all the brainwashed liberals fail to realize what a mess they’re trying to get us into. Wake up, smell the coffee, and get back to reality!
Posted by: Peter | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
It seems to me sharing implies giving by choice. The idea that government forces “sharing” through taxes makes it socialism. I greatly believe in sharing and give much, but it’s MY choice, not the government’s.
Posted by: classpiano | October 31, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Ok, we’ve been “demonized” again! First we’re the “bad guys” if you make over XXX dollars, and now we’re SELFISH! Let me tell you, between my husband and I, we’re on the boards of 6 non profits. 2 of them are backed by larger companies, the other 4 are backed basically by small companies, and individuals. (And I’m not talking about super wealthy individuals, mostly people who are comfortable and are willing to share what they don’t use.) We are already in a WORLD OF HURT!! The cutbacks by smaller companies and individuals has started and isn’t going to end anytime soon. Unless Obama intends to dramatically increase taxes, he will NEVER bridge the gap that these non profits do. We furnish families with food, shelter, education, the basic things the government hasn’t been able to do adequately. And now, to label the group in America that DONATES THE MOST, selfish, is truly insulting. In about 6 months, some of these shelters, etc., will be out of money, the economy won’t be recovered by then, and I don’t know how he’s going to pull this off, unless he bankrupts the selfish, and I have a feeling he wouldn’t mind seeing that happen!
Posted by: Jenny | October 31, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
You Obamaites are so disillusioned. Most of you don’t even know what you are voting for. You have allowed yourself to be mesmerized with this complete BS. Allwe can do is sit back and…. .if your messiah gets elected….. watch this country truly die……too bad those of us who understand each of the candidates policies to make the RIGHT decision… will have to suffer along with you.
Posted by: cant9562 | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
So not sharing the wealth is selfish now according to Obama… way to go! That’s really gonna push you thru Nov 4th!
On his infomercial he spoke about sharing toys, sharing pb&j….that was nice…CUS U WANTED TO DO IT! It would be different if your teacher was FORCING you to do it! That’s socialism and that’s what you want…. Come clean about your associations, guess you forgot HONESTY is a VIRTUE
GO McCain Palin 08!!!! from Miami, Florida!
Posted by: AR305 | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
The Economist Magazine’s endorsement of Obama is summarized in their own words, “He has campaigned with more style, intelligence and discipline than his opponent.” That doesn’t make his economic experience or plan endorsed.
Vote McCain/Palin ’08
Posted by: nObama08 | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Google “The Bolshevek Revolution”. It sounds like histiry is repeating itself. Hopefully.. without the bloodshed.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Let me get this straight…Barry says the way to create jobs for the middle class is by punishing the people who create those jobs, and by growing the economy from the bottom up. BRILLIANT strategy! Besides the fact that Obama is a racist, terrorist-loving communist, he’s also a friggin’ idiot.
There is no way in hell he is going to get elected on Tuesday. Keep the faith.
Posted by: lamindallas | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
From 2000 to 2004 Obama gave less than 1% of his income in charitable gifts. During that time he and his wife earned approximately $240,000 per year. Now that he is running for President and his income is closer to $1,000,000 per year he gave around 5% in charitable gifts for 2005 and 2006. I know families earning $60,000 a year who give 15% to charity and families who earn $400,000 a year that give 35% to charity. Seems to me he’s not willing to open his own wallet for a charity that he believes in, but he’s perfectly willing to take it from your wallet and then decide who should receive your money regardless of what you think. His finances prove that he is the one that is selfish.
Posted by: Kawasaki Kid | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
It amazes me that young people are for Obama. They are the ones that will be most effected is socialism takes root. They are the ones that will have to work harder to make ends meet so that someone else can sit on their rump and watch TV. They are the ones that will have to pay 15% SS tax on everything (not just the first 100,000) if they start their own business in addition to the Federal Income tax. This is like financial suicide. This is the way you suck the life out of a society.
Posted by: Bart | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“His point is that the republicans are deriding policies that help the middle class”
No, they do not.
That’s the point. The new deal failed. Just like it obviously will again.
If his policies would work, we would not need them today, because they have been tried on a grand scale already.
Don’t confuse killing the goose that laid the golden egg so the poor and middle class can get some gold eggs as helping them.
Posted by: Mr. Kelly | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
The government (dems or repubs) will find a way to spend ALL the money you send them. Why would you willingly want to send them more? Moreover, name one thing the government does well, other than spend money and defense. Do you really want them in charge or overseeing your health care? Just look at the Medicare and Social Security programs. They’re how much in debt? Yeah! Sign me up for more programs like those. The less government, the better.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Barack Hussein Obama – NOBAMA – KEEP THE CHANGE!!!
Posted by: Jim E. Norton | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Years ago there were people standing on the corners of streets wanting your change. They were called organ grinders. What did they have on the end of a lease wanting your change? A cute little monkey begging for your change. See any resemblence of the one wanting to take your folding money? Think long and hard before you vote for that monkey and the organ grinder on Nov. 4th !!!!!!!
Posted by: BIGDOG | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
HEY WOW….THAT WAS GOOD
Posted by: NICEONE | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I guess if you don’t accuse your opponent of being the devil, a socialist, a communist, a terrorist, the anti-Christ, a Muslim, and an alien, the only reason you would go on a blog would be to get money. Interesting.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
My husband is a lawyer. I’m a stay at home mom. I stay at home to make sure our kids have a great care taker; me. They are now very smart, happy, healthy kids. My husband makes $195,000. Some of the democrats are at this moment hating me because we make “so much money”, right? But guess what! We are still paying for student loans. We have loans for both of our cars. We have a mortgage just like some of you. We have credit card debt for the braces, the car repairs, the medical bills, the new front door we had to put in. We have very little in the way of savings. We don’t have much put away for our kids for college. We are NOT rich. I’m sorry if you make less, and you feel your life is not good because you didn’t go to college and get a great job. I’m sorry if you can’t have a parent stay home with your kids. We paid thousands of dollars in taxes last year! Should we really have to give up more money so Obama can give it to YOU? Obama never says that he will take into consideration how much debt anyone has before he takes more of our money. Oh, and by the way, my husband works hard. He goes to work at 7 and comes home at 7 and has to work some weekends. How long do you work? Do you even have a job? And don’t tell me there are none out there. Why should we pay for you and then have to lose our home in the process?
Posted by: Kate | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I was taught that charity begins at home. Obama wants to spend your money, but not a dime of his own to support his Aunt living in a Boston slum or his Half-Brother that lives in a grass hut in Kenya.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I am by no means an Obama fan, but with respect to “Bored on the Right”‘s comments about taxation, you are grossly off. You would pay 35% of the difference between the 250k bracket and the next bracket down, plus 25% of the max of the next bracket down minus the next bracket, and so on. Let’s say the next bracket is 150k.
If your tax burden at 150k is roughly $31,500 by the graduated system, then at 249k you’d be paying an additional $24,750 or a total burden of $56,250.
By earning 250k, you’ve hit a new bracket in which that extra 1k is taxed at 35%, making your tax burden $25,100.
If the bracket was 25%, that person’s burden would be $25,000 – a difference of $100.
Where it hurts is as you begin climbing up and beyond $250k. 10% is a lot for every additional 100k earned.
But please, don’t spout nonsense about how you’re better off making less…that doesn’t fly with people who’ve actually done their own taxes.
Posted by: Reason | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Specifics? Sure-USA-lead system of global capitalism is broken. We are the witnesses of this disaster. The overload of debt, spending and corruption brought this system to its logical end. But, as an optimist i see it as a beginning of new economy and America will have its important role to play in it.
As usual, at such junctions there is resistance from the old-world mentality. But the world has changed, geo-political influences and trade has also changed. Partnerships (regional and local) as well as new level of responsibility and transparency calls for redistribution of finances, instead of directing them straight to the hands of corrupt bankers and CEO’s. Obama gets it.
Posted by: valtonik | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Share the wealth should be a personal choice. Give to a charity or an individual of your choosing. I see so many RICH preachers and poor sitting in the pews. Obama will do for America as he has done for Chicago…go check out Chicago and all Obama’s pals and their mansions…and look how many are poor…if Obama was the man who could change the world or even America…then Chicago should have no poor!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Valerie | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
There is unrest in the forest,
There is trouble with the trees,
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas.
The trouble with the maples,
(And they’re quite convinced they’re right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light.
But the oaks can’t help their feelings
If they like the way they’re made.
And they wonder why the maples
Can’t be happy in their shade.
There is trouble in the forest,
And the creatures all have fled,
As the maples scream “Oppression!”
And the oaks just shake their heads
So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights.
“The oaks are just too greedy;
We will make them give us light.”
Now there’s no more oak oppression,
For they passed a noble law,
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe, and saw.
Posted by: Neil Parrot | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
I am by no means an Obama fan, but with respect to “Bored on the Right”‘s comments about taxation, you are grossly off. You would pay 35% of the difference between the 250k bracket and the next bracket down, plus 25% of the max of the next bracket down minus the next bracket, and so on. Let’s say the next bracket is 150k.
If your tax burden at 150k is roughly $31,500 by the graduated system, then at 249k you’d be paying an additional $24,750 or a total burden of $56,250.
By earning 250k, you’ve hit a new bracket in which that extra 1k is taxed at 35%, making your tax burden $25,100 (additional) or $81,350.
If the bracket was 25%, that person’s burden would be $25,000 (additional) or $81,250 – a difference of $100.
Where it hurts is as you begin climbing up and beyond $250k. 10% is a lot for every additional 100k earned.
But please, don’t spout nonsense about how you’re better off making less…that doesn’t fly with people who’ve actually done their own taxes.
Posted by: Reason | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Judy Green: regarding your question on Cindy McCain’s dre$$es — she runs Hensley & Co. Y’know, women are doing it for themselves … standing on their own two feet … and all that.
And what is it you don’t like about Palin? That she cut $268M of wasteful spending from the AK budget? That she succeeded in getting approval for a clean natural gas pipeline when past leaders could not? That she returns surpluses to AK residents (as a good guv should)? That she eliminated gas tax? Huh, honey? Or is it that she eliminated the state’s luxury jet, personal chef and personal driver to also save taxpayer dollars? Or is it that she invested $5B in savings for the state? Is it that she has fought corruption, that ended in the conviction and jail time of criminals in high office? Huh, honey?
You seem to have a problem with strong women — are you a self-hater? Or one of those fundi people who go to a church where women can’t wear pants?
Yeah, don’t get ME started …
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
There sure are alot of greedy, heartless, and paranoid racists in this country.
Obama is NOT a communist…or a socialist. …and he is not raising taxes (for%95 of us)!
Go out…get rich…create jobs! …and if you are really successful you will pay more taxes…and have more money.
You really think any president is going to eliminate taxes?
Wake up!
Posted by: judy Green | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
I am the most selfish person in America. I work hard, save money, contribute to my retirement funds, only buy what I can afford, invest in my chilren’s college funds, pay my own bills, pay for my heat and gas to fill my car. Oh did I mention that I also give a good percentage of my hard earned money to my church, and to a homeless shelter, volunteer for families in need, and give to medical causes I believe in? If you want “selfish”, under Obama’s plan I will stop the charity that I do and only care about my family because that is all I will be able to do once he pillages my money from me and my family and gives to all of those who don’t do jack.
Posted by: Selfish | October 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Biden gave under $1,000. to charity in 2007.
Say what you like, he’s either a cheapskate, a flaming statist, or in military parlance an “alpha-henry”… or some combination of the above.
Parenthetically may I add Biden right now probably resembles Hannibal Lechter-Bound and gagged- to prevent him from committing the “mother of all gaffes”.
Posted by: Gift of the Maji | October 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
You goofball the Economist isn’t an Economics Journal it’s a News Weekly written in the U.K. and isn’t conservative at all. Get your stuff straight before you post.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
USA troubles aboard, economic troubles at home, just the right time for a Demagogue to emerge, and just the right time for you to fall for him. Beware
Posted by: emetic | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Selfishness is not doing a bit of work and taking from the people that do. I am the and and I am not going to feed the grasshopper.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatreds.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away a man’s initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
Posted by: Lush | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
To poor college student,
And what are you doing here?!? I’m scared that you’re the the future of our country!
And oh, I hope the one who wins, wins it clean not by fraud votes.
Posted by: NB | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
It is smiley-face facism, just like George Carlin (via Jonah Goldberg) said it would be.
“When government becomes destructive to those ends [of securing the rights of the people], it is the right of the people to alter or abolish government and institute new government…” – Jefferson
“A well-regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” – Madison
Posted by: George Tirebiter | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
i volunteer a fair amount of my time. this is my choice. i do it, in part, because i do not believe that government is the key to anything. individuals and their efforts, are.
i can afford to do this because we have worked hard and made some money. go on and take it, obama. if you think your government can do a better job, go for it. i’ll find another way to spend my time and money….and i still won’t be poor….but why should i give, when you are going to take?
Posted by: rider237 | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Kawasaki kid – God I hope you are right.
Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Responsibility
I long to accomplish a great and noble tasks, but it is my chief duty to accomplish humble tasks as though they were great and noble. The world is moved along, not only by the mighty shoves of its heroes, but also by the aggregate of the tiny pushes of each honest worker.
– Helen Keller
I want to live in a country where work, initiative, innovation, creativity and determination are rewarded, where the able and willing can earn what they can, and keep what they earn. No government should ever reward those unwilling to carry their own weight. And those who take money by fraud should be held accountable for their actions. Taking more (higher taxation percentage rate) from the “rich”, those who know how to produce, to give to the “poor”, and those who can only consume, is not freedom or liberty. JFK once said, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.” He almost had it right. What should be said is, “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do to take responsibility for your own welfare.” Only this can be the foundation for a truly free society. In the United States, anyone who wants more money is perfectly free to go out and earn it, to the extent of their talent and perseverance.
I want to live in a society that doesn’t expect the government to take care of all its problems. I want to live in a society where people freely help those in need. But voluntarily, not as government mandate. I believe that if we were not taxed so heavily, if we could keep more of what we earned, then people would want to be more helpful, and would be able to be more helpful, and we would then more freely give to charities and churches, so our neighbors in need, whether next door or across the country, can get help that is actually helpful. This can only be done with a smaller, less intrusive, government. It can not be accomplished with a socialist welfare system that helps perpetuate the problems of vast numbers of the needy, and brings the overall standard of living down to the lowest common denominator.
Good parents teach their children how to provide for themselves and to spend no more than they have. The Liberal Left policies of Obama would be like bad parenting, in essence telling society they don’t have to provide for themselves, they can just get what they need from those who do. In no way could this possibly be construed as true freedom or liberty. While the Liberal Left’s policies sometimes sound good on the surface, deeper scrutiny shows they cannot possibly work in the long run (over-taxing those who produce jobs can only lead to fewer jobs; over-taxing everyone can only lead to economic stagnation). Senator McCain wants to lower both taxes and spending. This is the only way America can keep its place in the world as the economic leader.
Let’s get America back to basics: where each citizen carries his or her own weight and does not expect their neighbors to do for them what they should do for themselves. Let us not be a burden to each other any more. Let us not allow socialism any more into the fabric of our society.
Posted by: JP | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Wow… you liberals are SHEEP.
A) since when did “capitalism not work??????” Because the stock market is down some???? Yeah, and it crashed once, and came back… so some people lost some investments… investments have RISK, you idiot. We still have a lower unemployment rate than “progressive” countries like france have had in 20yrs… so, how is the system “broken?” – Oh, MSNBC must have told you that.
B) if you people are so “progressive” and “optimistic,” why do you insist that the “little guy” CAN’T make it without the govt’s help? I grew up in a one-parent family, with 3 kids… WORKED my way through college, and make more at 26 than my dad ever has.. I own my own home (at a good interest rate because I’m responsible, and therefor have good credit), have a 401K that was big enough to lose $4k in 30 days (and you don’t hear me WHINING about it) and feel that MY money, shouldn’t go to people that haven’t worked for it. And when it does, I will make the decision as to whom…
For liberals claiming to support rights, you’re so often hypocritical… when the govt. TAKES your money, they take away YOUR RIGHT TO CHOOSE what to do with it? don’t you people support “the right to choose” on other issues… (which by the way I also support- I’m a free-thinker, not an idealogue like so many marxists in here)
Keep YOUR nose out of MY pockets, then maybe I’ll help you keep evangelicals out of your wombs.
Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Kawasaki Kid – And if BO did give more to charity, it would be to a leftist group like ACORN and not an actual charity that helps people get back on their feet or that teaches them a skill.
Posted by: Ralph | October 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
So many people on this blog are predicting the sky will fall if Obama is elected…where have you people been for the last 8 years? The sky has already fallen. The DOW has dropped 6500 points, the government has nationalized banks (those that didn’t fail), unemployment is way up, our bridges are literally (Biden-esque) falling down, we’ve been attacked by terrorists, and we are in two wars.
Give it a rest. Your way clearly stinks.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Looks like it is Obama’s government that would be the selfish one.
When did the US become the nation that young acheivors and entrepreneurs are doomed to the poor house??? Obama is fabricating a fantasyland of gloom and doom and crisis that does not exist, and the voters are apparently buying his snake oil. This nation IS and has been a model of opportunity for those that are willing to take risks and work hard at prospering in the business world… Obama is simply inventing and selling a fictitious US where there is no hope for young workers and entrepreneurs in order to serve his true desire to establish a socialistic society. If he succeeds, we can all truly kiss any chance of acheiving individual prosperity good-bye unless we choose to become corrupt or choose to become an elected official.
Historically, US citizens have been very philanthropic with their wealth, exercising a freedom to financially support institutions as wide and varied as their neighborhood church, or scout troop all the up to larger organizations such as the United Way, or their favorite college or university. Our economy will not remain vibrant if government takes on the role of wealth redistributor. Philanthropy that would otherwise occur will be squelched as government mandates redistribution, leaving less and less discretionary philanthropy available to citizens. Incentives to innovate and take risks will evaporate as the prospect of reaping profits from such endeavors becomes suffocated by a ravenous and burdensome tax burden.
Make no mistake, Obama’s philosophy, if it becomes our government’s philosophy and the philosophy of most Americans will be the first step toward exterminating the vitality of US commerce and the vitality of the US economy. We will become a welfare nation sickened by a chronic malaise of economic mediocrity.
Wealth is created only by the labors of people. So, when government decides to require YOU to give some of what YOU earned to someone else who didn’t earn what they will receive from YOU, government, in effect is saying that government OWNS YOU and your work to the extent that government can make you work for someone else. Historically you have the opportunity to do this on your own whenever you want to…when the offering plate is passed, when the Salvation Army rings a bell, when you pass a beggar, when you donate to whatever cause you want to donate to. Historically, YOU have had FREE WILL to do this or not to do this. OBAMA WANTS TO REMOVE THIS FREEDOM and make you a servant of the state, with effectively no individual rights whatsoever…think about it… if this is what government becomes, your rights are gone… you are at the beck and call of your government… and make no mistake, government’s standard operating procedure is to continue to grow and continue to control YOU more and more.
When government overly burdens those that actually produce the wealth that pays for everything, the incentive to produce wealth evaporates and the economy weakens and the country becomes economically weak.
Posted by: Bennett | October 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Hello Judy Green!
Surely after all this campaigning you know who John McCain is married to?
You wrote:
“How does a senator afford 7 houses and $300,000 dresses for his trophy wife?
Do Senator’s really make that much money?”
It would appear that you are not aware that she is the heiress to a beer fortune.
You call John McCain “a scary man.”
Your ignorance and the millions like you are what scares me. You follow the herds and spout mis-truths without even knowing the facts!
Posted by: JBS | October 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
As a devout atheist, Ayn Rand greatly mistrusted religious institutions in the same way she mistrusted government. So, she would be appalled by the grip the “religious right” have on the Republican party. But, let us not lose touch of her lessons and philosophy. Obama is clearly exactly the type of character she feared most of all.
Here are a few good quotes from her:
“Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper’s bell of an approaching looter.”
“There are two sides to every issue: one side is right and the other is wrong, but the middle is always evil.”
Please don’t dismiss her philosophy as anything but devoutly anti-socialism simply because she urged people not to vote for Reagan. Who do you think she actually wanted people to support? Carter? Mondale? Come on, people.
Posted by: smoogdog | October 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
This election may turn me into an objectivist yet…
Obama wants to short circuit the american dream, make everyone settle for half of it.
Like him:
Half communist, half democrat.
Half African, half American (NOT African-American!).
Half rich, half poor (poor little rich boy that he is…).
Half qualified, half “black enough.”
Half inexperienced, half elitist.
Half “erudite” (what a joke), half dialect.
Half ivy league, half street-ball.
Does America want half a leader?
That’s Barack Obama aka Barry Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama II.
Still think you know who I’m talking about?
Even he’s not sure!
Posted by: zer0bama | October 31, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
It’s hard for me to recall a more selfish politician than Obama, who WILL raise taxes so that HE and HIS CROONIES can decide WHAT to do with that money. That the American people should want to decide what to do with their hard earned money and where to give to charity, now that’s just not exceptable to Obama.
He must be the one to decide. He IS a socialist.
Now, that’s selfish!
Posted by: Sonya B. | October 31, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
To Bored on the Right, who said:
“Assuming the number is actually $250k, which today it’s evidently down to $120k, here’s an easy math problem.
If a man making $249k has to pay 25% in taxes, his take-home pay = $186,750.
If a man making only $1k more than that ($250k) has to pay 35% in taxes, his take-home pay = $162,500.
So for earning just $1,000 more per year, he has to live off $24,250 LESS than the first man.
That’s $24,250 that he could have donated to the charity of his choice.
Shame on Barack Obama for his ridiculous plans.”
I don’t think that’s how it works. And I might be wrong, given that I am definitely not in the $250,000 bracket. But I think the higher tax rate is applicable on the amount that exceeds $249,999.99. So if you make exactly $250,000, you would pay the higher rate on one penny. I think. Damn that Turbo Tax software. I don’t remember the last time I actually looked at the tax brackets …
Posted by: Bo Jakes | October 31, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Judy Green,
REMEMBER IN 2011, THE BUSH TAX CUTS WILL EXPIRE AND CONGRESS AND bo WILL NOT MAKE THEM PERMANENT. SO REMEMBER EVERYBODY’S TAXES WILL GO UP EVEN THE ONES MAKING $50,000!!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
P. S.
Florida repealed the notorious Intangibles Tax in 2007, if I’m not mistaken–leaving new, fertile ground for fresh taxation. Resident Florida retirees–you’re hearing Obama’s words, but are you listening for the meaning? Folks on fixed incomes–are you listening? You’re next.
Obama has neither the courage nor the intellectual honesty to cop to the very Marxist tendencies to which he ascribed throughout his academic career and post-academic career. Doesn’t that give you clues as to his future behaviour?
Sir, your denial neither erases nor replaces the truth. Theorists of alternative (read: non-Capitalist) idealogies, with the guts to publically advocate their theories, may merit some respect. Liars who obfuscate their true positions, however, merit scorn, derision, and dismissal.
Posted by: WTT | October 31, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
to NEIL PARROT:
Brilliant!!
it’s a great song.
Posted by: Chuckles | October 31, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Hey JP:
Although some of us take great pride in those quotes from Lincoln and Jefferson (Hats off to you for posting them). I have come to the conclusion that leftist will never get their meaning or respect the intentions. They are too wrapped up in the politics of envey.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I wasn’t happy when McCain won the nomination. But Obama’s made my choice an easy one.
Thanks for the help Barry. You really do care.
Posted by: gary | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Mediocrity will be the name of the game if Mr. Obama becomes President. Basically that’s what he’s pushing for….it’s not that he’s trying to help hardworking Americans who maybe are out of a job temporarily. This candidate wants to write a check to those people that are already living on welfare due to not wanting to work. Check it out. Goodbye to the real American dream if he is elected…..God help America.
Posted by: bella61 | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
For the imbeciles who advocate the rich leaving the country, just what do you think the country will be when all the citizens are poor? Ifor one am considering emigrating for a few years until this country regains its sanity. I can go and pull $2 million out of the US ecomony and take it anywhere I want. That’s 20-30 well paying jobs offshore. Enjoy your government mandated poverty.
The democratic party is now the party of the lazy. They have become socialist thugs who are now trying to justify their policies on the basis that those who oppose are selfish. I think it is more selfish to sit on your ass and do nothing.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Who care’s how hard the rich worked to earn their money? I’m tired of these lame seminar posters acting like they’re the majority and that they know everything. Obama’s plans to take from the productive and give to the unproductive are socialist. When we chose to give away, it is charity. When Obama forces it, it will be government mandated theft. Obama is change we don’t need.
Posted by: Ryan | October 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Money made by the rich is not “hard earned.” In terms of the level of effort, poor people work far harder and more often often have to earn their living in more complex and stressful ways than the rich. Dollar for dollar, the more that people are rich the more that they are recieving a reward because of their opportunities for ownership of property and investments that are unavailable to the poor. The problem with our economy is that the value system for individual contributions to our society has become invalid. Experience, education and effort are no longer a significant part of the formula for success within business. The primary job of the wealthy has become that of remaining in political and economic control. This is what is so self defeating for everyone. Unless true progress is made to adjust our fundamental value system of opportunities not only will the economics of our system continue to fail society, humanity will not be able to take on and solve the looming problems of our environment, energy, overpopulation, shortages of food, disease and military conflicts that are about to overtake us. The conservative objective of our society is to moblize ourselves and unite our nation to solve the failures of a false value system that has placed absolute notions of property ownership over the greater national security concerns of progress and survival.
It is a fundamental mistake of conservatives to make the arguement that fairness of human opportunity is socialism because it is the basis upon which their econsomic wealth must be based.
Posted by: Sandy, Washington D.C. | October 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
There are two kinds of people in the world, there are the people that lift and the people that lean. Under Obama the lifters will have the responsibility to share the fruits of there labor with the leaners.
Posted by: meanmarine | October 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Well I just would LOVE for all those class-envying OBAMA SUPPORTERS to take a quick trip to the outskirts of Moscow and St. Petersburg and get a view of what HOUSING UNDER THE SOCIALIST OBAMA REGIME WILL BE LIKE IN THE FUTURE. Enormous dingy gray concrete block ‘apartment complexes’ housing 5000 plus people. A lovely 300 sf cube for an ‘extended’ family of grandparents/parents and kids. No grass,landscaping, playgrounds, pool, etc. Makes Cabrini-Green look like a Four Seasons. WOO-HOO! YES ya’ll need to really get a look at what LIFE UNDER SOCIALISM IS LIKE, because I HAVE BEEN THERE, and you people JUST HAVE NO CLUE. Look at where Obama’s own FAMILY MEMBERS LIVE! And y’all believe HE CARES ABOUT YOU? Oh my goodness, truly, like lambs to the slaughter…..
Posted by: jean | October 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
I just wonder how this election would be different if McCain had picked my guy Mitt Romney as his VP pick. My guess is that the ticket would be up 6-9 points right now. Romney has the economic chops that neither McCain nor Obama have. And don’t get me started on Palin. I mean I like her social values, but she doesn’t inspire confidence…
Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Reply to Neil Parrot, who wrote: “And the trees are all kept equal/By hatchet, axe, and saw.”
And the maples were happy until the dwarf Japanese maples formed a union …
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
SELFISHNESS is the the key, lets look at the tax returns for the “Generous” Demicratic candidates vs the “Selfish” Republican team. Who is Selfish? Who MUST depend on the government doleing out $$$$ for charity, and who knows that charity is something best done on your own.
2006 RETURNS
OBAMA – 6.1% of income (a hugh increase over past years)
MCCAIN – 28.6% of income
Biden – .3% of income
Palin – 4% of income
I guess if I thought that everyone was a Selfish as the Democratic Team, I might have to assuem that charity needed to be forced by the government too.
Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
It’s amazing that Obama keeps talking about **benevolence** – when he and Michelle have consistently donated less than 1% of their annual income to charity.
Posted by: horrified | October 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I would say that pretty much every person on this board has been brainwashed into supporting socialism in America. Even the 60 year old poster early on that talked about having to work the rest of his life, and though it was before even his time, our country began down its road to socialism when woodrow wilson, philander knox, and others quickly slipped in the “federal reserve act” legislation into congress shortly before Christmas of 1913, while there
was a skeleton crew of congressmen still at the capital (many had went home for Christmas) they passed the legislation which in effect set up a banking cartel of private banks (of which the US government was to be a fellow MEMBER) and it was alotted them the power to manufacture our money and then loan it back to our government with interest (even if we zero out our federal deficit, we will always perpetually owe the private banking cartel IE: the federal reserve, interest), this in essence removed the constitutional mandate that CONGRESS and CONGRESS alone manufactures US currency and regulates the US economy and put it into the hands of PRIVATE banks (several of our founding fathers, most noteably Thomas Jefferson warned future leaders against doing this very thing).
A number of years later the federal reserve cartel helped create the depression (recently the “fed” has apologized and admitted to creating the
depression) during this time while US citizens were out of work, going homeless, hungy, along comes FDR with his “New Deal” this was basically redistribution-of-wealth-socialism that began turning America into a welfare state. Americans were scared and hungry, so they accepted it.
after the depression eased up (its effects lasted into the 1950′s) this new deal socialism had taken root and became part of the American new form of
government, and over the years liberal and conservative one after another has helped perpetuate it, build on it, and entrench into our psychy so that
now we Americans dont even remember what our Democratic Republican form of government that our founding fathers had built was even like. With the
exception of a handful of congressional members like Ron paul and others, most democrats and republicans in congress are socialists by definition, as
they perpetually vote for welfare programs and redistribution of individual Americans wealth… their PRIVATE property.
Later on, Woodrow Wilson commented that he was ashamed and felt that he might have destroyed his country.
Obama is just a radically obvious socialists, no doubt very bad news for our country, but technically our country hasnt really been a free Democratic Republic since 1913. You guys are sitting here arguing if 250k is rich or 120k…
but in the end your all arguing for un-American, unconstitutional SOCIALISM.
Posted by: PK | October 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
If every child get a free way through college, then who, in the next few years, is going to flip the burgers I so enjoy?
Posted by: ken | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Political Science 101: People are Self Interested and people with similar interests will group together if there is a benefit that they all benefit from. If a man of Obama’s stature doesn’t know this it’s insane. The fact of the matter is raising taxes on anyone especially in a down economy is simply going to further curb consumer spending and send the economy into even more of a tailspin.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
He who Works not Deserves not .
He who demands we pay him for Not Working is the a very Selfish man .
He who demands we pay those who don’t work for votes is the most selfish man on Earth .
Barack H. Obama was taught his moronic theories By Karl Marx obviously .
PS – Obama has 6 very poor Brothers and Sisters in Kenya and very poor Kenyan in Boston and a Grandmother in Hawaii .
He ”according to his FAMILY ” has never given them a penny of his Millions …. that is beyond selfish …… he is a fraud ! Do as I say ….. not as I do !
Posted by: ReCon USMC | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
It appears that most people don’t understand that even though Obama says he’s not goint to raise taxes on 95%
of working Americans, the tax cut that we currently have because of Pres. Bush
is going to expire in 2010 and our taxes will go back up several percentage points. Obama and a Democrat congress are not going to vote for this tax cut to continue. Wake up America!!!
Posted by: ryan | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
PK, speak for your own “socialistic” self!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
SOCIALIST IS TO KIND FOR THIS MAN! Obama ascribes to the ideals of a chicago communist Saul Alinsky as does Hillary Clinton. Obama is student of Marxism not socialism. He has ties to Mr. Ayers a self proclaimed marxist and home grown terrorist. He would be in jail for all his days if some liberal judge didn’t dimiss the bombing based on a wire tape as non admissable evidence. These ties are not when he was 8 years old but his coming out party for junior senator in Ill. Of course there are substancial ties to ACORN also a communist group who are trying to stuff the ballot box for this election with anyone and everyone who will vote for MR. Obama. Read people read and know the facts about your candidiates before you vote or you will regret your decisions after the fact.
Posted by: TD | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Honestly, Tim. Is it Palin that doesn’t instill confidence or Palin seen through the media filter that doesn’t … you know where I’m headed. See my earlier email about her accomplishments while guv. I’ve stood behind a lot of candidates that the media has utterly destroyed, so I have to discount media input. I would have loved Romney, too, but it wasn’t meant to be this time around.
And … can we get back on the real issue here … Obama’s freaky tax plan?
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
My mistake. The posting to which my earlier comments referred was by this poster:
“Posted by: teddymaniac | Oct 31, 2008 11:17:36 AM”
Posted by: WTT | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
The media has sold out the country because they are either lazy or evil. Stalin would call them “useful idiots”!
The path the Obama is heading isn’t about just taxes. This guy is a communist and it took very little research his history. Look what his cousin did in Kenya before selling them out to the Muslim’s.
Posted by: Use the "C" word | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Judy Green What do you think of Obama luring in the wealthy senior (age 62+) vote by proposing they won’t have to even file taxes with $50,000. income and what do you think about many of those seniors $50,000. income coming from a multimillion dollar portfoilio? I guess Obama doesn’t mind the wealthy seniors being selfish just the middle class families who still have children to feed, clothe, insure and send to college.
Posted by: conf1689 | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
I’m sick of this class warfare crap. Its politicians like Obama that really turn me off, but you bet I’ll vote for McCain this year. I don’t agree with everything he says but he seems more genuine and honest. I can’t trust Obama and am not really sure what his true plan for our country is, but so far it doesn’t look good.
Posted by: Jack | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
His Brother lives on a dollar a day in Kenya, and his Aunt lives in subsidized housing in Boston. And he calls those who do not want to pay MORE taxes selfish?He and his wife make how much? And he has the unmitigated gall to call us names. Oh BOY! That is the ticket. Unbelievable… Yep that is change alright… but not any change we welcome.
Posted by: KaBees | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
MSNBC loves him and so does the NY Times. That just makes me want to vote for him – NOT! The US is so far in debt to other countries it isn’t even funny. After he TAXES us the Democrats in charge will spend the money on Their programs, not “Redistribute the Wealth” unless you count ACORN or enforcing the Fairness Doctrine.
Posted by: Superman | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
I feel sorry for him, but I hope he wins, and proves that a person can achieve anything, and race is no longer a barrier. But the only way to SAVE this country is to raise taxes, AND slash the budget, both by historic proportions. His timing could not be worse to try to learn the job on the fly. He will either go down in history as being despised for “abandoning” the left, as we ALL suffer through the times ahead, or the man at the wheel when the Titanic went down. THE US IS GOING BANKRUPT! THAT’S THE REAL STORY> DO THE MATH!!!
Posted by: d | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Sorry PK, we are on the same side: Capitalism
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Nobody wants to talk about his leaving his Auntie to survive in government housing in Boston? I’m sure she wants to be independent but isn’t there some place in the middle where he might put her up? Did she already blow all her royalties for being a character in his book? Or did we forget to share the wealth?? Jeswonderin.
Posted by: SteveBob | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
JAY!!!!! with the NFL Example!!! Please read this!!!
I can tell you haven’t drank the whole glass of koolaid yet so there might be a chance for you…
Consider this, I can see the reasoning behind your analogy of it needing to be for the “team.” You are right. We should all be on the same team. That’s why we should all be paid the regardless of matter what race sex religion etc etc etc we are. We can all agree that that Fair. 100%
HOWEVER, you have to have a society that has “Incentive.” to better ourselves. For example, who do you think would have the better team, make bigger plays, attract better players to be on the team, get along with each other better??
Team 1: Where the best players on the team are irritated b/c they are pulling more of the weight. The medium and lower skilled players don’t try to improve b/c it won’t do them any good.
Team 2:(Like good Capitalism in the US) The players who scores and gets yards, and make tackles, and etc etc, get paid according to what they DO, not just being lucky to be on the team. The good players are constantly striving to keep what they have, the medium/lower producing players are encouraged to make improvements to get more money and recognition??
Obviously Team 2 would succeed, AND be happier overall because they WON..TOGETHER. Spreading it around doesn’t work, and never has EVER in ANYPLACE IN THE WORLD..
In the cold war the US was able to capitalize on the drive to succeed of the American people. The Soviet Union had to rely on people’s love of the Motherland, and fear of getting thrown into the Gulag to compete against the US.
The rest of the story: There is no more SOVIET UNION… IT IS DEAD!!!!! because the US won. WE BUNCH OF GREEDY SELFISH PATRIOTIC JERKS…WON!!!!!!!
You still have hope, just think it through my friend, and remember always remember this. GOVERNMENT doesn’t give anybody anything EVER. It NEVER HAS. It appeases people and spills crumbs from it’s table of power, so you don’t pay attention to them laughing at you, because they are programming you to depend on it.
Sucks but that is the way it is.
Posted by: WL | October 31, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
I didn’t realize that Cindy McCain was such a “catch”.
WOW..I have so much more reverence for the guy now.
I guess if I was him I’d dump the old wife and hook up with the hotty too!
Posted by: Judy Green | October 31, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Begging Hands and Bleeding Hearts will only cry out for more…
Know your place in life is where you want to be
Dont let them tell you that you owe it all to me
Keep on looking forward, no use in looking round
Hold your head above the ground and they wont bring you
Down
Anthem of the heart and anthem of the mind
A funeral dirge for eyes gone blind
We marvel after those who sought
New wonders in the world, wonders in the world,
Wonders in the world they wrought
Live for yourself — theres no one else
More worth living for
Begging hands and bleeding hearts will
Only cry out for more
Well, I know theyve always told you
Selfishness was wrong
Yet it was for me, not you, i
Came to write this song
Posted by: Alex Liveson | October 31, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Notice to All Employees
As of November 5, 2008, when President Obama is officially elected into office, our company will instill a few new policies which are in keeping with his new, inspiring issues of change and fairness:
1. All salespeople will be pooling their sales and bonuses into a common pool that will be divided equally between all of you. This will serve to give those of you who are underachieving a “fair shake.”
2. All low level workers will be pooling their wages, including overtime, into a common pool, dividing it equally amongst yourselves. This will help those who are “too busy for overtime” to reap the rewards from those who have more spare time and can work extra hours.
3. All top management will now be referred to as “the government.” We will not participate in this “pooling” experience because the law doesn’t apply to us.
4. The “government” will give eloquent speeches to all employees every week, encouraging it’s workers to continue to work hard “for the good of all.”
5. The employees will be thrilled with these new policies because it’s “good to spread the wealth.” Those of you who have underachieved will finally get an opportunity; those of you who have worked hard and had success will feel more “patriotic.”
6. The last few people who were hired should clean out their desks. Don’t feel bad, though, because President Obama will give you free healthcare, free handouts, free oil for heating your home, free food stamps, and he’ll let you stay in your home for as long as you want even if you can’t pay your mortgage. If you appeal directly to our democratic congress, you might even get a free flat screen TV and a coupon for free haircuts (shouldn’t all Americans be entitled to nice looking hair?) !!!
Posted by: JP | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I remember all of the paranoid socialist talk in 1992 when the last Dem took office. Yeah the 90′s were a real nightmare for capitalism. NEWSFLASH! The US of A has had a graduated tax system for about 100 years. You folks are freaking out about a 3% shift in the upper bracket. Spend half of that energy addressing how the money is SPENT – like farm subsidies, wars, or tax rebates for buying a Chevy Suburban, or the whole department of education. That is where the screw job is and will continue to be. Be a good lemming and BASH the other side. Just don’t look and see that BOTH sided are spending like drunk sailors. As for you Repubs – face it, the last eight years have seen your party crap all over any semblance of true conservative governance. That is why you are losing. Relearn what you forgot and come back in two years.
Posted by: hamilton | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Do you really want to vote for someone who has lost their mind because what Obama is saying is sheer insanity. 95% of the public doesn’t want to pay taxes at all, the other 5% are liars. But Obama is telling us we’re selfish because we don’t want taxes raised. What gaul! His method is to first make us feel guilty about not wanting to pay higher taxes then to tax us more. And he doesn’t mean just the rich. If you read between the lines he intends to increase tax on most of America. THIS IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY SPEAKING. They are not democrats THEY ARE SOCIALISTS. They want to take your money and put it directly into the hands of people not willing to work for it. The Democrats control the House and Senate and now they stand to control all phases of legislature. For 8 years they’ve been stomping like a bronco waiting to be let out of the pen. And when they get out they are gonna buck like you’ve never seen a bronco buck. We are all gonna be on a very bumpy ride. THE DEMOCRATS ARE NOT WORKING FOR US BUT THEMSELVES. Don’t believe their rhetoric, it’s only smooth talking to get your vote. Obama is the most democratic of the modern day democrats. Look at his affiliations before you pull that switch! Wright, a blatant racist, Ayers a convicted non-repenting domestic terrorist, and other unsavory characters. These people helped make Obama who he is today! They helped Obama be a political success. Do you think they won’t expect payback! Do you want these people dictating and deciding policy both domestic and international? They will have input no matter how far under the carpet you sweep it. You’ve been warned.
Posted by: Harry | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
If Barry is so compassionate for the poor, why has he not taken care of his own family that live in poverty while he lives a life of luxury. Give your money to them, not mine.
Posted by: texas ranger | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
You say that the poor have to work harder for their money than the rich. Well to bad. I was poor I worked my @$# off to go to school (paid for by myself) and get in a position where I no longer had to flip burgers for a living. If I made it out everyone can make it out. It is not my responsibility to make sure everyone has a ladder. NO ONE PAID MY WAY TO THE TOP. I used my own sweat and blood!!!!!
Posted by: SoImRich | October 31, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Kudos to Obama’s highmindedness, but seriously, are we going to elect this fiscal infant?
Soaking small businesses, corporations and the upper class to help the middle class hurts the middle class.
1) It destroys economic incentive to create wealth.
2) It encourage complacency by making the bottom a comfortable place for under achievers.
3) It takes money away from from those who hire employees, and invest in companies that would hire employees. This reduces EMPLOYMENT, which means the middle class has less total economic output.
As someone in Obama’s middle class, I expect to have less discretionary money, fewer job opportunities, fewer retirement options, and a less secure future for my children. The future looks bleak. 30% unemployment seems just around the corner.
Posted by: yourauthor | October 31, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Perhaps Obama and Pelosi should share some of their wealth! They aren’t concerned about the middle class and anyone that thinks Anybody think I’m wrong should take a look at what his communist terrorist cousin did in Kenya before selling them out to radical Muslim Shira Law. Obama is using the same words and has the same goal!
BTW – Obama is 44% Arab/African with roots going back to slave owners not African Americans!
Posted by: MSP | October 31, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Here is what I don’t understand. What type of tax break do you get for being “rich”? I have checked my IRS forms and do not see any “Rich Person” deductions. They appear to be the same for everyone, house, business expenses, charitable giving (Barry and Joe might have done better here) health care, child credits, education expenses.
But NO WHERE is there any “break” for being “rich”. Would someone explain?
Posted by: Fletch | October 31, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
‘The idea that government forces “sharing” through taxes makes it socialism.’
————————————
Based on this definition wouldn’t a McCain administration be Socialist since they will force us to pay taxes? I have no children, so I don’t want to “share” my tax dollars to fund public education.
Posted by: jeff76 | October 31, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
“Choice for choice” sake is a sophistry and a lie
For by “choice” thousands die
How can God excuse a nation,
That murders its own creation?
Demons had their choice and fell
Now they are forever tortured in hell
And how can the indignant unrepentant
At Judgment say “I know my rights”
When they demanded lives of the innocent?
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
There are many who believe in charity and giving others a hand up (I for 1). Obama and others are taking tax money not to help others but to control them, Money is power in this instance. Once he has them under control like those already working for the government then they will continue to vote for him and his socialist cronies. We are on a slippery slope in this country and I pray that we do not elect him. They pray to Government and Power I pray to God and in the end one is far more powerful than the other!
Posted by: DGreenBay | October 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
geevill,
yes, your country does all these things, but with all due respect, the comparison is not valid.
you have a population of 7 1/2 million primarily of european back round. we have a population of 300+ million from everywhere.
because of the makeup and size of your society, your standard of living…is pretty standard, across your country.
a better comparison would be england and the US. they have a very mixed population of about 63 million, and are finding it quite hard to deal with the fact that about 50% of their folks are now dependent on the government for all or most of their livelihood. it is not a supportable situation. the more the government takes care of people, the fewer people there are to pay the taxes and support those on the government payroll.
this is what we face in this country. we have the potential for a diminishing tax base (aging wealthy, poor immigrants, and generational welfare recipients) paying ever higher taxes to support those who want to have everything given to them.
the higher the taxes, the less accumulation of wealth, and in the end, the fewer taxes collected.
Posted by: rider237 | October 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Why is anyone rooting for Obama? After Bush is done bailing out the rich, and Obama is done sending checks to the guys on park benches, exactly who will be paying for all this crapola?
Look in the mirror, brother. And hold onto your change before another politician steals it too.
We need some serious statemate in Washington again to keep ‘em from spending another dime.
Ever hear a politician say we can do more with what we’ve already got?
Posted by: Big Jim Slade | October 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Let’s see if I understand socialism …police, fire, libraries, public schools, public hospitals, medicare, highways, bridges, oh yeah and war. But hey if you all want to see all that disappear then stop paying your taxes or better yet figure out a way to lower them with write-offs and non-reporting of income and the next time you hit a pot-hole that blows out your shocks don’t get angry just buy a bigger truck.
Posted by: KAJ | October 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
It seems like the top 1% all post on ABC.com
If you are making less than 603,000.oo dollars a year and complaining about Obama’s tax policy you need to get your head checked!
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Sen. Obama can glibly spout family values and charitible giving all night long until you look at his personal giving.
He has blood relatives living in a slum and a half-brother living on 12 bucks a year while he lives in a mansion and jets around the U.S. campaigning for a job for which he has no qualifications or experience.
Posted by: Joan | October 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
It’s given me so much hope just reading people’s posts here. I’m glad I’m not the only one who sees through Obama’s rhetoric. If he gets into office, God help us all.
Posted by: Jane | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Okay, now I am a selfish person because I don’t want to be taxed more than I am now? Give me a break here. I have worked 7 days a week and have put in countless 18-20 hour days trying to get my business up and running. I have created jobs and everything we use is AMERICAN made and nothing is imported, NOTHING! This is my 5th year, the first 2 1/2 years I worked a full time job, went to school at night, served in the National Guard and worked trying to my business growing. While I won’t bring home over $250k this year next year I should be well over that if our projections are correct. So after all this hard work to get to where I am I am supposed to roll over and say “here ya go, give this to someone who hasn’t invested a dime or any time into my hard labor? I think not and that isn’t being selfish. I give to charities and the past two years these donations have grown from $25-50 to a couple different ones to $1000 plus to the same ones and have starting giving some to other charities also. So I am spreading the wealth and I never ask for anything in return, not even advertising for my business, that is not what giving and caring is about. So if Odumba thinks I am selfish he needs to take his head out of his ass when Joe Biden only gave $2300 to charities last year and he makes a hell of a lot more than I do. McCain/Palin has my vote for 08!!!
Posted by: Allen | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Judy Green … your jealousy is showing!
Yeah, John was a dirty dog for what he did. But, hmmm, do you, my dear, have skeletons lurking in your closet?
I had a friend and Obama supporter slam McCain as a hard drinker — I’d not hear that one before. Funny thing, my friend is an alcoholic. Sigh. We love to sit in the seat of judgment, don’t we?
And can we please get back to Obama’s freaky tax plan?
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Doesn’t anyone remember 2 years ago when everyone freaked and ousted the Republicans? Replaced them with Dems? Why are you all still trying to blame the Republicans? Democrats suck. Pretty much.
Posted by: ken | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
“And what is it you don’t like about Palin? That she cut $268M of wasteful spending from the AK budget?”
Actually, since she took office. She has cut more money out of Alaska earmarks than the next 4.5 highest states consume in federal earmark spending combined.
She broke records on how much money she is saving the federal tax payer from what it was when she took office.
Alaska still is #1 in earmarks, don’t get me wrong. But it’s important to know the the other facts.
Posted by: Mr. Kelly | October 31, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
rick,
your math, as is the case with many misinformed liberals, is a bit missplaced regarding your “Dow down 6500 points”, under Bush.
Bush entered the white house in 2001 with a Dow at 10,000. The Dow went up to 14,000 by 10/31/07.
Currently, it is at 9,325.
So, while the man in the Oval office has NOTHING to do with the stock market, at least you can admit that your math is way off.
Posted by: kenny the pig | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Selfish….look at Obama’s charitable giving. Under 1%!! He is the selfish one! Wants us to give our hard earned money away but he sure isn’t donating that much of his money…..
Posted by: Jen from Minnesota | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Typical Marxist. This Obama is a scary creep, and if he is lucky enough to get elected, you’d better grab your bonnet, because it will be one heck of a ride. Not a good one!!!
Posted by: William | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
If you look at all the states run by Democrats, you will see failure.
Arizona had a billion dollar surplus in 2004 and now we’re running on empty. Our Governor is now putting in traffic cams to generate money and it’s not working because they have to post Photo Radar signs before the camera and everyone knows where they are and we avoid them.
New Orleans, democratically run and it’s a failure, New Jersey, democratically run and on the verge of bankruptcy. They have the highest rate of unemployement and poor and corruption than anywhere else.
Take a tip and elect anyone but a democrat and Barack is a socialist so you’ll be getting more of the same only worse. It will be laws he signs by his cronies in Congress.
If that isn’t a scarey Halloween story, nothing is!
Posted by: Marcia | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I’m selfish, greedy, ungrateful, miserly, and misanthropic. What this socialist doesn’t understand is that taking more of my income will only make me want to squeeze more out of the government in return — because I own more of it than I did before the tax increase.
Perhaps this would be the best approach for the heavily taxed — go about interacting with the government as if you owned it. (Suprise! We do!) Those who don’t like it can get to the back of the line.
Posted by: Mhu Cao | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
“A good deed never goes unpunished”-
Do a good act and get grief back
To them who say: “Don’t trust or love,
“You’ll get no return”, they don’t love
Expecting a return on “your investment”
Misses the entire idea of giving “love”
For, love is like the air you breath
Freely given, and freely taken
Love is not meant to be saved
Its nature is to be given back
Without it we are walking frames
Souls abiding in flesh and bones
Exiled from the One Love
From the cross he could have said:
“A good deed never goes unpunished”
But instead He lovingly said:
“Father forgive them for they know not”
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
“Let’s see if I understand socialism …police, fire, libraries, public schools, public hospitals, medicare, highways, bridges, ”
Geez take a trip to Cuba and check on the state of any of those. You might be one dumbest human beings on earth.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I’ve never made more than $75K/yr, yet I have outgiven Obama over the last 10 years in the area of charitable giving. (Yes, that percentage-wise and actual dollars.) Look at Biden’s charitable giving and then try to convince ANYONE that he truly cares about the underprivileged!
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
What is very interesting here on the ABC news website is that 99.99% of these comments are against Obama. So where does Pelosi get the idea that he’s supposed to win by Landslide? From the Pols? Ok, well… this looks like a reasonably informal pol to me… and it looks like Obama gets squashed flat in the election. So I don’t get it. How did he win again?
Posted by: Joe Public | October 31, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
He wants the middle class to get to the middle class. He is an idiot or his supports are idiots. You can’t blame him the American voter who likes what he says is as dumb as the come. A race war is coming and the middle class whites will win. Liberals will be gone into hiding.
Posted by: tk | October 31, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
All of you Republicans that are voting for McCAIN (AT LEAST SUPPOSEDLY) Im sure 99% of you are not republicans, but for that 1%
I Say to you…
I am the greatest leader ever. I stand for hope. I will bring this country to greatness. I will make us the greatest in the world. Let’s stand together. Let’s Change Washington. Yes We Can!!! Don’t be selfish. I’m gonna solve everyones problems. Don’t be racist and not vote for me. etc………………
Let me know when you have decided to vote for me so I can stop saying things, and by the way let me know what I should tell you, and I’ll say it.
By the way I have a glass of koolaid for you. TO HECK WITH MCCAIN OBAMA and all of em…VOTE FOR ME. I SAY GOOD THINGS…
WHAT? You don’t know who I am and wonder would like to know more????…
Come on now people, lets not be bigots now. JUST PULL THE LEVER FOR ME!!!!!
Posted by: WL | October 31, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
It’s about fairness, Steve…
There should be no reason for the gov’t to take nearly 50% of another American’s income. We simply spend too much. By the way, the reason for the growth of the 90s was because Clinton cut taxes on businesses, not because he raised taxes on one group of people to give breaks to another group of people.
Posted by: RO | October 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
We’re gonna have to settle this the way Erica Jong predicts….with a 2nd Civil War. 100 million heavily-armed red state Americans VS sissy urban liberals and illiterate welfare scum.
Guess who wins?
Posted by: SGT Rock | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
plainsm,
ya we are, im a conservative capitalist, but my posting was the fact that though we are discussing mcain/palin vs obama/biden, even though i side with conservitives, republicanism in this country is still “socialism light” its still out of whack with our founding ideals.
no doubt if i had to choose between the two main parties i would go with mccain, if anything, at least to perpetuate some sort of perception of having personal freedoms and somewhat less government on my back which will no doubt be much the opposite under Obama’s version of socialism.
Posted by: PK | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
cavtrooper, I like your post
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Posted by: hamilton | Oct 31, 2008 5:07:44 PM
In two years there won’t be a country to come back to!!
Posted by: DJ | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
if you want to reduce government spending and see US productivity really take off, don’t let congress sit in washington all year long spending our money.
go back to the old days. give them a time limit of 3 months to take care of the real business of the country, then send them home.
they won’t have time to have hearings into baseball steroids, etc.
if they are home with the people they are supposed to represent, instead of sitting in washinton making stupid laws and spending our money, we’ll all be better off!
Posted by: rider237 | October 31, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
A refugee from the former Soviet Union was quoted on the Brian Sussman show, KSFO, saying “The unequal distribution of wealth is much better than the equal distribution of misery.”
So I’m selfish and unpatriotic because I don’t want to pay more taxes? As others here have said ‘Oh puhlease!’
In Obama’s and other liberal minds, the Goverment must be the charity because liberals are not nearly as charitable as Conservatives. Obama’s only point of reference is selfish liberals who must have taxes increased to extract more money from their pockets. Consider Joe Biden’s (please take him) lack of charitable donations as evidence. The only way to get more money out of liberasl is to raise taxes.
If taxes are cut, Conservatives will make larger donations; liberals will simply keep the money.
Posted by: SunnyvaleKen | October 31, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Wow this is reporting. Oh wait no it is your opinion. I bet you are going to call this the race card.
Man you are a jerk. Sorry excuse for a “reporter”
Posted by: J in Austin | October 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Selfish, huh? I work my backside off to get ahead for me and my family and those I CHOOSE to assist and I’m selfish because I don’t want the Government telling me who I will help support?? I think not! I read somewhere today that Obama is planning on how to bring people’s expectations down once he’s elected. What? All the promises were just that – promises – and now he wants to bring us down to reality once he gets our vote. The joke’s on us. Not me! I’m not crazy about McCain but if Obama gets in, we’re in for some pretty bad surprises. It gets scarier by the day. The more I learn about Obama (although some of his past is ‘sealed’), the more he scares me. The people have been duped by an attorney that knows how to give a good speech, period. He’s an empty suit with a scary background. He has idealistic plans but doesn’t have the money to back them up so he wants to rob We the People and then calls us ‘selfish’ if we object.
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I am struck by Obama’s rhetoric, wherein he states he doesn’t know “when they made a virtue out of selfishness”. How timely, that he would speak to selfishness, when we recently learned that his aunt lives in squalor in Boston. If he is so well-intentioned why hasn’t “he” seen fit to offer assistance to her given the millions he’s made writing his memoir, rather than accepting money from her – money she apparently does not have. Not only is he selfish in his “giving”; but of his time. His costly trip to Hawaii to visit his ailing grandmother was a media event. Imagine “giving” only 70 minutes (by newspaper reports) of your time to a woman who helped raise you? What a role model! Maybe that’s indicative of the “drive by love and caring” we can expect from this man who wants to be President. A man who by his example, says “do as I say, not as I do”. Practice what you preach Mr. Obama – you have much to learn. Your words are empty and meaningless and speak only to your lofty agenda.
Posted by: Peggy | October 31, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I’ve got news for you Plainsm. The liberal IS the new middle class.
Better get used to it, conservatism is dead and George W. Bush is the man that killed it.
Posted by: Dennis | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
@Voter2Be
“Obama will use the Government to correct the immoral selfishness and make us virtuous, righteous and generous.”
And yet the man only shows about 1% of income for donations to charity on his tax forms. He is the immoral selfish one who would rather give OTHER peoples money rather than his won. Many words, no substance.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Selfish? Where’s that wealth redistribution to your auntie living in Boston Barry? Hypocrite.
Posted by: va va voom | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
I think we should do an Obama halloween. You’re the Obama government, so when the kids come up to your house, weigh their candy bags and “redistribute” the candy so all kids have an even amount. Then, take some of the candy out of each bag for yourselves and take some more candy for those who didn’t trick or treat that night. That’s o.k. they didn’t put on a costume and walk, they deserve it anyway just because it is “fair”. This will work until everybody sees those who work for the candy are no better off than those who sit and wait for the government to give them candy because it is “fair”. That’s an Obama halloween waiting for America!!!!
Posted by: Matt | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“It’s about fairness, Steve…”
Fairness? The Declaration of Independence already garentees “fairness” when it states that everybody being indowd with certain inalieneable rights, the right to life, liberty, and the PERSUIT of happiness…
youll never find a gaurentee of happiness, just the right to persue it, and everybody has it, thats the fairness. Wether an individual attains it is up to each his/her own doing.
Posted by: PK | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“the Great Depression was causes by Republican Majorities in the 1920s that lead up to the 1929 Stock Market crash! The 1930s were the years of the Great Depression and it took a Socialist, FDR to get America back on track. It took him almost 10 years to do it”
~~~~~~~~ (too many of these “~” is really annoying)
Many econmists argue that FDR’s New Deal programs actually turned what would have been a resession into the Great Depression.
Posted by: scooter | October 31, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Obama is a fraud, he allows his relatives to live in poverty but where is this pointed out by the MSM. These liberals are always generous with other peoples money never with there own Obama gave to his church that preached hate and his sidekick Biden donated practically nothing according to his disclosures. Obama is a monster who will let babies who survive abortions die, who has demonizes hard workers as selfish, declared the US Constitution as flawed. He is as far from the things that made this country great as you can ever get. He and the Democrats will destroy this country.
Posted by: frank3108 | October 31, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
I am SELFISH!! NOT RICH!!
But we have worked our butts off to make sure our kids were educated at our expense. I am still working at 68 to help them and am appalled to see my latest tax bill showing 48% of the bill going to Social Service programs that I have never taken a dime from.
READ MY LIPS!!! NOONE WILL REDISTRIBUTE ANY OF MY SO-CALLED WEALTH!!!!
For all of those that are drinking the OBAMA KOOL-AID, you will deserve all of the empty promises he has made to you.
Remember when Billy was going to give you Health Care???? Dream on folks.
Posted by: natalie | October 31, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
If Obama is elected, my generation is going to have to deal with the fallout. If men like Jefferson and Lincoln were of the opinion that personal industry and personal selfmade success are the keys to happiness and well-being, then how can anyone who respects this country and its greatest men believe that “spreading the wealth” will do any good for the country.
I don’t make much, and essentially all of it is spent on living, college, etc, but you know what? I’m okay with that, its part of life, its encouragement for me to get my degree/s and to move up the chain. It’s laughable to think that people don’t understand how encouragement and motivation work. If you want someone to work hard to survive, then give them no other way out. If you are bankrupt and broke, then get yourself in gear.
If you dont make much money and can’t buy a mercedes that you really want, dont take a loan, don’t buy it, instead buy the cheap, fully functional vehicle and keep on trucking. Satisfaction in life shouldnt be based on material possessions and “things”. Obama apparently believes that american’s need to buy more things, become more materialistic.
If you think a sexy car brings happiness then you obviously have forgotten what joy feels like.
Obama is embracing the ideals of socialism, whether he wants people to believe that or not, and if he’s elected, I’m going to have to endure while people learn the “lesson” that you don’t need to do your best to be comfortable, or even do well. Socialism is a slippery slope, and once you step onto it its hard to not slide all the way down.
Posted by: Young College Student | October 31, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Wow. I think Obama just sealed the deal by sticking his foot in his mouth. Nothing like confirming he wants to “spread the wealth”. Congrats to McCain.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Obama, Obiden, Ocrap
Posted by: JW | October 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Can anybody name one socialistic or communistic country that is thriving in economic prosperity??? …and this is the direction Barry wants to take our country into????
Posted by: diqiti | October 31, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
The Chicken Hawks are fluffing their feathers!
Posted by: Gars Luber | October 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Why doesnt BO take care of his own family first with his own millions?
His own Aunt lives in a Boston slum and his half brother lives in a shack in Africa on $12.00 per year.
Maybe he’s waiting for the white middle class and white rich to pay raise his own family from the bottom up?Why
wont he use his own money? What a Hypocrite!
Nice racist church you go to BO!!!
Posted by: Jeff Tucker | October 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Let’s see now, Obama is calling us selfish if we don’t want to be taxed higher so that those who don’t pay taxes can get a rebate (welfare). He’s pretty generous with our money. How about his brother who is living in squalor in Kenya on $1.00 (yeah, that’s right ONE DOLLAR) a month; and now we just find out he has an aunt living in poverty in a housing project in Boston. He’s not too generous with HIS money, is he?
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need,” -Karl Marx. But no, his tax plan isn’t socialistic, is it?
Let loose with some of your own wealth, Barry, stop being selfish and help your own family!
Have you noticed that the messiah and the windbag have lowered the bar at which one is considered wealthy? First it was $250k, then it dropped to $200k, and now it’s at $150k. Do you think by the end of the year, if these clowns win that it might drop to $50k or even $40,000.00?
Posted by: John Garvey | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
I am growing tired of Senator Obama calling me a racist, clinging to my guns and religion, and now selfish.
Well, senator, I make tens of thousands of dollars less than you and I donated to charity more than you, that is until you decided to run for president.
What happened to his bring people together? It sure does not seem that the senator wants anyone with differing opinions around him. Someone needs to remind the senator he works for “We The People.”
Posted by: cj | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Thanks, M. Kelly, for adding that context to Palin’s record.
As to McCain being against taxpayer waste, you might have heard these stats:
- Citizens Against Govt Waste gave McCain a 100% score for the year and an 88% lifetime score (hero status).
- CAGW gave Obama an 18% score (pathetic); he doesn’t have a lifetime score b/c he’s hardly been in office
- CAGW gave Biden a 0% score for the year and a 22% lifetime score
Now, if you want to stop wasteful spending in Congress … who you gonna vote for, eh?
McCain/Palin — the ones with the record for cutting waste
Or
Pelos(ki) — Obama — Reid: The Axis of Taxes
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
obama:
I will share my Social Security check with you IF YOU SHOW ME YOUR TRUE BIRTH CERTIFICATE To all others every one who didnt suffer the Great Depression needs to..Then tell me your values…..
Posted by: bud | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
What scares me more than anything, is the enormous money Obama has raised in his campaign, especially after reneging on an agreement onlyu to use public funding. So tell me he is not in bed with special interests, the writing is on the wall. BTW some of the contributions came from overseas, doesn’t that make you a little skeptical on his real intent!
Posted by: KM | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Ya I heard that about Obama’s aunt too.. on Rush Limbaugh yesterday.
What the hell is wrong with you people don’t you get any news from reliable sources? Or has Rush scared you away with all that “Drive by media” talk?
Posted by: Dennis | October 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
BIDEN IS SELFISH!
$2,500,000 earnings.
$0,003,600 given to charity.
That’s just around 00.14%
LIberals are so generous with my money, not their own.
Posted by: Jose | October 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
I can’t wait for Obama to become the president. I won’t have to work, I’ll get a free house, and I’ll get free health care!
Posted by: Brooks | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
If you can afford 3 houses and a private jet then you can give a little extra to help educate children, fix the roads, fund the state, etc. You can because you’ve been given a great opportunity by this country and as an American I would hope you’d feel the compulsion to give back to it as a thank you. What I find overwhelmingly hypocritical is that this virtue of giving back is rooted in Christian philosophy. But then I guess that’s one of those values the religious Right takes and leaves as it chooses.
Oh, and again – those claiming socialism has no place in this country – I trust that you are not now nor will you be (should it still be available) planning to cash those social security checks. I mean… it DOES go against your obvious beliefs and if you participate in that socialistic movement then I suppose you can just label yourself as one huge hypocrite.
Posted by: Kat | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Why does it take the British press to track down the Obama family tree? Are there any working press left in America?
Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Since Obama is so good at raising money why don’t he do a big fundraiser for the American people and spread that wealth around instead of using my money.
Posted by: Karen | October 31, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
YOU KNOW HUSSEIN OBAMA HAS CALLED US JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING NOW SELFICH….AND HE WANTS TO BECOME PRESIDENT… THINK AGAIN HUSSEIN O.. YOU WILL LOSE….TAKE CARE OF YOUR OWN FAMILY FIRST… YOU MENTAL MIDGET
Posted by: linda | October 31, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
This thread apparently has a high moron-quotient. As usual they are spouting the “socialist”, “communist”, “welfare” meme that the GOP has spoonfed to them. Educate yourselves before you post. The definition of socialism isn’t hard to find. You might also do well to remember that the GOPs core tenet of “free market” was also a core tenet of Communism, but you’d hate to admit that wouldn’t you.
Posted by: / | October 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
February 1, 2011 Washington DC: In the name of Freedom, Congress passes a new law making Selfishness a Federal Offense. All Capitalists will be thrown in prison while the rest of America waits in soup lines, to praise the equality we have achieved. Read Ayn Rand, she warned us!
Posted by: Brad Johnson | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Why does Obama want to take money from people who work for it and give it to people to spend on junk – what, more tennis shoes, cell phones, iPods and computer games? More and more, Obama is just a jerk.
Posted by: Patriot | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
It’s weird, because the part where Obama says that if people have more money they’ll do more good with it and it’ll help everyone, that sounds exactly like what Republicans used to say about tax cuts for the rich.
Posted by: Gail | October 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I love the comment “rich people don’t work as hard as working-class people”
I have managed people for many years and I have come to one conclusion, most people in any given job have a similar talent level…the one’s who make the most money work the hardest and work the longest.
My top sales people hit the 40 hour work week sometime Wednesday. Probably put in almost 80 hours a week working for the man. These guys eat, drink, and sleep “work”. The pressure they are under is immense and never ending. My boss, the CEO, is consumed by work 24-7.
Many people cannot handle this type of pressure and choose to leave. I have seen people walk away from $300,000+ jobs for half as much money and 2x the quality of life.
Rich people work hard, very hard and the thing they sacrifice is their time. Yes time, the finite resource we all have. When you raise taxes you take time from me and my family. When you spread the wealth you spread my time. You work 40 hours a week, great, I work 80, I made my choice, you made yours…dont tell me I don’t work. Don’t spread my time around to those who do not work, its not fair to me, my family, or those who work with me.
Posted by: patrick127 | October 31, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I’m rich. If you tax me higher, I’ll just leave America and go to a country where I can invest, start businesses, and employ people without getting raped by the government.
Why should I take risk in a country where all the rewards are taken from me?
Posted by: Josh | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
All you rich selfish, gun carrying, religion believing people better give up the Cash cause i’m going to be able to quit work now. THANK YOU BIG O. Its about time I get mine. And all you racist white rich people making over 40,000 better vote for Obama and pay your TAXES to the massiah so I can get mine and live the dream.
Posted by: Page | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Apparently Obama doesn’t realize that EVERY American has the same opportunity to achieve the American dream. I’ve got a novel idea for you Hussain – HANDOUTS DO NOT HELP US ACCOMPLISH THE AMERICAN DREAM. Government getting their nose out of our business and being frugal with our money rather than increasing taxes does allow us to work towards becoming what we want to become not what you think we should become. We live in America not some 3rd world socialist country so that WE not YOU can determine out destiny.
SELFISHNESS IS YOU TAKING EVEN MORE OF OUR MONEY AND BLOWING IT ON GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS THAT TANK OUR ECONOMY.
Posted by: d | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
“If you can afford 3 houses and a private jet then you can give a little extra to help educate children, fix the roads, fund the state,”
You moron how many people making $200,000 a year have a private jet ?
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Let me get this straight. I have to bust my rear so my family will have a good life and future, and adopt another family to help them make it to? You are right, this isn’t socialism. It’s stupidity.
Posted by: Nixon | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Better selfish than a thief.
Posted by: Geoff | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
anybody here supporting any relatives living overseas or in another state? maybe a few people (well guys mostly) supporting an ex.
really, who here here is sending a check to an out-of-state relative, or any relative for that matter?
no one here is for socialism right?
Posted by: markly | October 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Biden is going to be a horrible President. Someone should throw Obama off his stinkin smelly plane at 25,000 feet.
Posted by: Obomber Marx | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
@jozsef
“A lot of rich people would leave me struggling to deem their dollars “hard earned”
Perhaps you don’t know too many “rich” people. The ones I know were all classic type”A” workaholics who routinely had to mortgage their houses to the hilt and borrow against their IRAs on more than one occasion to keep their business afloat during their startup phase.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Obama’s definition of “rich” is a moving target. First it was $250K, then one of his ads said $200K, then Biden said $150K and Richardson today said $120K. Which is it? If he can flip on public financing, what makes you think he won’t flip on what the definition of rich is? It’s not too hard for a working family to have a combined income of $150K and they would be by no means rich. And since when is it SELFISH to keep more of your hard earned money?
Posted by: SarahH | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Taxes go up so there is less to spend. Then, prices go up because business still needs to make its profit after paying the fairness Obamatax. Then the stolen money from the high taxes isn’t enough and people don’t buy things, and businesses close and no more jobs and more welfare needed so the rich stay rich and the middle class goes into poverty. That is what this is really about – the elite class taking control. Obama made $ million last year and he will not even give a dime to his destitute aunt and brother. Now, that is really selfish – isn’t it. How can Obama even sleep at night when he accuses other of being selfish? HMMMMMM?
Look at what happened after the high taxes and welfare of the 90s and the destruction of our military and intelligence services – we got 9-11 – that was change for sure when we were attacked on our own soil for the first time. I may be so bold as to suggest that not all chagne is good. Taxes lowered after that tragedy and the economy recovered – until the democrat controlled motgage mess whacked the economy. Check out who go tht most contribution money from Freddie and Fanny – Dodd, Obama, etc.
Look at the welfare of the Carter years – took him four years and we had 20% mortgages and huge taxes and descent into recession looming. Regan lowered taxes and the economy recovered. The Obama plan is the same stupid anti-business plan that has failed time after time after time.
Go ahead, go stupid and vote for Obamachange if you dislike your friends and country, put Carter 44 in office and watch your future crumble before your eyes. Then in two years remember what you did and come back and clean out the congress to try to recover the country. Or, avoid the risk and vote Republican now and in the future.
Posted by: Sable | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
The poem that Neil Parrot posted earlier about trees is a song by the rock group RUSH. The lyrics of this song were written by the drummer Neil Pert. Who I believe has a PhD in philosophy and is a student of Ayn Rand’s writings. The idea that socialism cuts human industry short is not lost on me and I believe Barack Obama is poised to hack all the oaks to death come Nov., 5th. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are sharpening their hatchet’s, Axe’s and Saws even as we post. This tirfecta of liberalism is very dangerous. And the fact that the mainstream news outlets in this country love these liberals simply mean that when they ruin this country they will not be held responsible. (Any news outlets commenting on Barney Frank and Chris Dodd in relationship to Freddie Mack and Fannie May?) This is remarkable times. Oprah and her pop culture, shallow thinking ilk are going to drive Amreica into abadon.
Posted by: brent | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I work for a payroll company and Obama’s website is not being accurate regarding taxes over $250,000. If you are self employed and you and your spouse earn $250,000, you will pay and additional 12.4% Social security tax 6.2% for employee + 6.2% for employer plus 39% for your tax bracket + state income tax depending where you live. That’s at least 51 cents for every dollar – that’s nuts! It’s working overtime for half pay or worse. If you have a state income tax you may only take home .30 per dollar!!!
Posted by: concerned | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Hillary was very unselfish and gave all her delegates to Obama. But was Obama unselfish?
Really. This funny. Politicians don’t have to run a business or, apparently, a budget for a living. But to keep defend their careers, they’ll be as ruthless as they need to, won’t they?
So why doesn’t Obama understand that we’ll defend our own — our country, our livelihoods, our right to enjoy the fruits of our labor?
I never put any stock in the strange controversy over his birth certificate, but the more he sounds like a radical loon, the more I do wonder: Is this man an American? Cause he sure doesn’t understand what we’re about.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
There goes Obamaclaus again!! Giving away what doesn’t belong to him.
How generous the Democrats are with other people’s money, except theirs.
Posted by: janet | October 31, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
How is getting tax money back welfare? It’s not a handout, it’s a handback. People who do not pay taxes, will not get money back under Obama’s plan. Do some reading yourselves and stop listening to fox/rush.
Posted by: Ha | October 31, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Matt — the Obama Halloween plan is a scream! I’m forwarding that to all my friends — and crediting it to you “Matt, Political Punch.” Brilliant!
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
More hypocrisy from the novice Obama. I’ll tell you what I call selfishness, being a millionaire and not sending one penny to your poverty stricken brother, slum-living aunt, or the school in Africa that has adopted your name and that you promised to support. That’s either selfishness, or apathy, or both honey. Now he wants our money.
Posted by: Liz | October 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Jose, the story on BO’s Aunt was written by the UK Times????
You didn’t expect an American paper to cover this story did you? Why doesnt Keith Obermann start his show tonight with
“BO Selfishness” WONT TAKE CARE OF HIS OWN FAMILY BUT IS GOING TO TAKE CARE OF ALL OF AMERICA WHEN HE’S ELECTED..
What a joke
Posted by: Jeff Tucker | October 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Give a middle class person a tax cut and he will go buy a T.V. and some beer.
Give a rich person a tax cut and he will invest in a business.
If you had to choose between the two, which tax cut is better for the economy and actually helps America more?
Posted by: josh | October 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Talk about selfish! This guy’s half-brother in Kenya lives in squallor on $1 a month. His aunt lives in a slum in Boston. Do you moron really think he’ll help YOU when he won’t even help his family? This guy is a liar. He is a hateful man, and hopefully you won’t make the mistake of voting for him and finding out the truth about him later.
Posted by: Zoie | October 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
If you make more than $250,000 you will have your taxes raised. If you make under $200,000 you will have your taxes lowered. Whinge to us after Obama gets elected and you have a lower tax bill in a year, would you?
Also, some of the richest people in this country are supporting Obama’s plan because they know that having a fairer economic system is in their best interest, even though they’ll be paying more. That should tell you something.
Posted by: slag | October 31, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I really don’t understand the outrage. Most of the people, probably 95% of you who have posted, will do far better under an Obama administration than you would under McCain.
Do you not understand that over the past 8 years, wealth has been “redistributed” to the very top so that the top 1% now make 21% of income. Income redistribution is not a new concept. The problem, for those of us who see it as a problem, is that the Bush tax cuts have done more to give more to the people at the top than to middle class Americans.
If you think that’s fine, then you should vote to continue these same failed policies. But if you’re not in the top 1% of wage-earners (which is about $1.5 million/year), then you should take a look at Obama. But stop calling it socialism, especially when you don’t even understand what it means.
Posted by: What's Wrong With You People? | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
“You moron how many people making $200,000 a year have a private jet ?”
You’re missing the point. I make less than 100,000.00 a year – I live a good life – drink good wine – eat good food… my life isn’t driven by the almighty dollar – but if were to make more than 200,000.00 a year I would give back more so that people making less than me could live better. That’s what makes me a nice person – a giving person – a Christian person. You however just called someone online a Moron… and I guess that just makes your entire personality ugly and your soul a little more empty. Try losing the language and fighting for your opinions without slinging mud.
I find this consistent with Conservative retort – you all have such ugly little things to say and seem to gloss too much over what could be educated opinions. People don’t listen when you use that language and you’ll change nothing by being ugly.
Posted by: kat | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Obama is in for a rude awakening if he actually tries to govern this way. Does he think “rich” people will just roll over and pay more in taxes? They won’t. They will go elsewhere with their money, or cut labor costs and raise prices to make up for punitive taxes. Creating poverty is not good economic policy. I don’t know if he is naive and really believes what he preaches or is just another fascist leftist. My guess is the latter.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
People, please, read the facts before you post. Obama only kicked some of his critics of his plane. Fox is still there, along with several other news sources that endorsed McCain. Man, you people are starting to sound as freaked out as the far left!
Posted by: jah | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Wow, selfish is a bit strong when the so called “rich” are already in a 35% tax bracket. My question is: Just how much does he want??? “Giving” over a third of your income to be spread to those who are “behind” seems pretty dog gone generous to me!?!?!?!
Posted by: Johnny | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“How is getting tax money back welfare? It’s not a handout, it’s a handback. People who do not pay taxes, will not get money back under Obama’s plan.”
His plan calls for adjusting the brackets so more people won’t pay any taxes, get it.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Zoie: “This guy’s half-brother in Kenya lives in squallor on $1 a month.”
Obama’s half-brother: “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Selfish? He’d have to look at their tax return to see how much they GIVE to charity. Once you TAKE the money, it is no longer “charity”. Obama and Biden should know–they haven’t given much to charity. Check their tax returns.
Posted by: Sandy | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
I love the class warfare Obama is peddling… has everyone thinking America is only about money… and not about freedom. People like Kat who posted earlier don’t know the difference between being compelled by a government to do something and someone doing it of their own free will. A lot of people skipped class when they were being taught the role of government.
Posted by: Mike F. | October 31, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
“The point is, though, that — and it’s not just charity, it’s not just that I want to help the middle class and working people who are trying to get in the middle class — it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot…” is all very well and good, but it presupposes that those people have an actual affinity to work, and not just sit on their duffs waiting for the government check to arrive!
Posted by: Sue Julian | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
It’s pretty clear what Obama’s doing.
He can’t earn the votes, so he “buys” the votes. With YOUR money.
Lessee … welfare vote + government worker vote + ACORN votes … what will this net him? Now add in the middle income class with a promise to cut taxes … ah, that’s more like it.
Typical politician. And you supporters actually believe he will cut taxes for the middle class? Like Bill Clinton did? Hehe. Sad fools.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
All the socialist rhetoric sounds nice, but when you look at socialism in other countries it has failed miserably. People need to learn some history and study some basic econ.
For those of you who voted in Bush in 2004 congrats, that idiot has ensured that we will elect this idiot (Obama) in 2008
Posted by: ahlesa4 | October 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
What Obama doesn’t tell or doesn’t get it, is that charity is giving from your own pocket to those you want to help. The government taking my money and giving it to whomever it wants, is not charity, it is welfare, i.e. socialism. This is Obama’s way of “blackmail guilt”. Don’t buy into it.
Posted by: Deborah | October 31, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
If you believe in Obama’s ever-shifting numbers on which he will give you a tax cut, let me remind you of the same promise made by the other Democrat messiah – Bill Clinton. How’d that work out for us middle-classers?
History will repeat itself if this wanna-be Marxist wins next Tuesday, only this is not 1992.
Posted by: Roy in Illinois | October 31, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
It’s all about the Ice Cream
The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching third grade. The presidential election was heating up and some of the children showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for a class president. We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and the class would vote.
To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members. We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. We got many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to run for the top spot.
The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates were good kids. I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots of parental support. I had never seen Olivia’s mother. The day arrived when they were to make their speeches Jamie went first. He had specific ideas about how to make our class a better place. He ended by promising to do his very best. Every one applauded. He sat down and Olivia came to the podium. Her speech was concise. She said, “If you will vote for me, I will give you ice cream.” She sat down. The class went wild. “Yes! Yes! We want ice cream.”
She surely would say more. She did not have to. A discussion followed. How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn’t sure. Would her parents buy it or would the class pay for it. She didn’t know. The class really didn’t care. All they were thinking about was ice cream. Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a land slide.
Every time Barack Obama opens his mouth he offers ice cream, and fifty percent of America reacts like nine year olds. They want ice cream. The other fifty percent know they’re going to have to feed the cow.
Posted by: Zoie | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I’m sure I’m not the only one to find it peculiar that such a high percentage of the posts are anti-Obama. What’s even more disturbing is that there is no mention whatsoever about how McCain would be a superior choice. Americans across every division have awaken to see that no matter what is said, quoted, written or blogged; the idea that giving the super rich breaks and incentives does not “trickle down” to the rest of the economy. Its an impossible sales job you guys have but are to be commended for consistency of message and for giving the appearance these are individual comments and not the same staffers posting repeatedly. Good luck with that…
Posted by: Pragmagnetic | October 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
EXPAND WELFARE ON ME. NO WAY JOSE! THE TWO O’S DON’T SEEM TO KNOW IF THE DEDUCTION START @ 250k OR 200k OR 150k BUT GOD!! FORBIDE HE ELECTED IT WILL BE @ 40K THE DAY AFTER INAUGURATION SURPRIZE PEOPLE O&0 MISCACULATED THE TAX FIGURE. SORRY BUT NOW THEY COMMAND!!! WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT’S TO LATE OR YOU WILL PAY DEARLY BY THIS SOCIALIST NOBAMA PERIOD…..
Posted by: Roy P | October 31, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
When are you McCain dupes going to realize that Mccain cannot be trusted on anything. He was aaginst the Bush tax cuts and now he’s for them. He was for comprehensive immigration reform and now he wants to build a border wall first-he wouldn’t vote for his own bill on immigration he says. He’s a liar and has his behavior during the first few days of the economic crisis a few weeks ago showed someone “out of touch” to say the least. Add to that his totally incompetent VP choice (and anyone who saw her Couric interview must agree) and you have a candidate that has no business being in the White House. Obama is supported by Warren Buffet-hardly a socialist and Google CEO Schmidt to name just 2 red blooded busines people. So stop dinking the Kool-Aid on Obama’s associations as if he is anti-American because you show how totally ignorant you really are.
Posted by: theMick | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Wow! I can’t believe Obama’s about to get elected on this platform of socailism. You know, the last thing we need to do is demonize the rich. They might just take their companies, jobs, and wealth and leave our country.
Posted by: Ben | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Americans are slow to anger, and traditionally will over look a lot of things to avoid a fight. Witness all the wars in which we’ver ever fought.
It took 80ish years before we felt strongly enough about slavery to fight the civil war to abolish it, WWI was nearly over before we entered it, it took Pearl Harbor to drag us into WWII, the Islamo Terrosit killed Americans off and on for twenty plus years and it still took 9/11 to drag us to declare “enough” and finally take the fight to them.
Once convinced of the rightness of our cause, we fight to win.
Obama may be the straw that breaks the camel’s back on the lib’s incessant calls for more & more taxes from the people out busting their butts everyday to achieve the American dream.
As an achiever, you can do the Atlas shrugged thing and leave the country, or you can fight to reclaim the limited government our forefathers left to us at great sacrifice.
In the words of Jefferson, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
Posted by: OptimusMaximus | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Aengil:
If I was living in squalor like Obama’s half brother (I’ve seen the Vanity Fair pics of him and his shanty home) with a shot at asking for financial help from Obama, well, I’d say whatever Obama wanted me to say, too.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
From Wikipedia:
Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how, and to what extent this could be achieved.
Sounds like Barry to Me…
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“People like Kat who posted earlier don’t know the difference between being compelled by a government to do something and someone doing it of their own free will.”
I don’t know the role of government? Let’s look at the basics shall we:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
It’s all in how you define welfare sir. It has nothing to do with my knowledge of a system I have spent my life around. My definition of welfare however differs from yours – and that’s fine – but do not for one moment attempt to belittle my understanding of our country.
Posted by: kat | October 31, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Wake up, Obamunists- your hero’s Robin Hood “inspired” tax plan, lack of foreign policy and executive level leadership experience, and known dealings with domestic and international terrorists will have devastating consequences for this country. If Obama is elected, we will be lucky to still be considered a developed nation after his four years in office.
Somewhere Beria, Stalin, and Lenin must be smiling in approval of a possible Obama presidency…
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
HAlloween at the Obamas: If they run out of candy when the kids come by trick-or-treating, they take from the kids who have bagfulls, and give it to the kids who come by later so everyone gets some at their house!
Posted by: Phil | October 31, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Such a new deal. How long now before the Amero?
Posted by: cpar | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“Selfishness” from the fellow who gives 1% of his income to charity. Some of us just feel we are better givers of our money than the govenrment.
Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Let the democrats win. It’ll only last four years and after they’ve convinced everybody what a massive mistake they’ve committed the country will vote the entire democratic party out of office and we’ll finally be on solid ground with the whiners, do nothings, and immorally bankrupt democrats out of office. I can put up with the liberals stupidity for four years I think just to see them come to their knees when they’re all voted out of office.
Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
YOU ARE WHO YOU ASSOCIATE WITH.
SIMPLE FACT OF LIFE.
IF A CHILD WANTS TO HANG OUT WITH THE THUGS ON PLAY GROUND, SHOULD A PARENT BE CONCERNED?
IF A CHILD WANTS TO HANG OUT WITH DRUG ADDICTS, SHOULD A PARENT BE CONCERNED?
IF A HUSBAND WANTS TO HANG OUT AT BARS, SHOULD A WIFE BE CONCERNED?
IF A WIFE WANTS TO HANG OUT AT BARS, SHOULD A HUSBAND BE CONCERNED?
IF A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WANTS TO HANG OUT WITH “FORMER TERRORISTS”
(former used loosely) SHOULD AN ELECTORATE BE CONCERNED???????????
I WOULD SAY YES TO ALL ABOVE.
Posted by: WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Congrats to Jake the Journalist. He made the Drudge Report today.
The other thing I noticed is that many of the Obama fanatics posting here refer to other posters with differing views as Republicans…. as in “You.. you… Republican!” Like it is a dirty word. Well, I’ll have you know that many of those who you suppose to be Republican are in fact Independents. Think about it.
Posted by: jcarob | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
it’s been fun.
“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money”
Alexis de Tocqueville
i would add also…the presidential candidates.
yes, i might do better under Obama, but i’d rather earn what i get, not have it given to me. isn’t that one of the early lessons we teach our children? the joy and the value of earning something?
Posted by: rider237 | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Interesting that he calls it “selfish”. The majority of those agaisnt “redistribution” are not directly affected by his proposed tax increase on the top 5%. So effectively they see this as being a negative in the long for themselves even though in his eyes they should benefit directly. Perhaps those “selfish” types understand that the top income earners are already heavily taxed. Perhaps they “selfish” types are not selling there votes for “what’s in it for me” but rather, “what’s best for my country”.
Yours Truly,
A selfish guy.
Posted by: patriot_USA | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Wow. I can’t believe some of you people out there. Barack Hussein Obama is a disaster waiting to happen and it is mind boggling that there are people out there foolish enough to actually vote for him. For all of you out there who believe I should be a good guy and give you my money – You have lost your minds. I owe you nothing and I will not participate in giving handouts. I give to charities, more than Barack Hussein Obama and his caring wife have given. If you want more, work harder, go back to school and get a degree so you can command a higher income but if you want a hand out from me it aint going to happen. And the lying Obama can’t make it happen. He has socialistic ideas that will never get passed, regardless of which party controls Congress.
Posted by: Ping2007 | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
pragmagnetic- I will be the first to say that John McCain is not my first choice for a Republican Presidential Candidate. I can’t help that, but he is a far cry the lessor of those two evils. And why does everything come back to attacking the super rich. That’s an age old Marxist trick of convincing the working class that that those at the very top are to blame for their lot in life. It is socialistic. Obama IS A SOCIALIST!!! and what he is intending to do is steal from me, the same as if he came to my door with a gun.
Posted by: hank reardom | October 31, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Those who support Obama are in for a real treat! Just look at the morons in Congress did to the luxury yacht industry when the Dems in Congress said, who cares if we tax luxury yacht purchases, its just a bunch of rich white guys who will pay more in taxes. Simple, right? Wrong! Those stupid white rich guys bought their yachts overseas, and the US yacht indutry went under — and that hurt ALOT of middle class, blue collar workers who build the yachts. The rich are rich cause they are smart. If taxes get too high here, they simply move things around or take different types of pay. Tax corporations and they always — always — pass it along to the consumer, and often that hurts the middle class and poor the most. In a way, if Obama wins, it will be like Carter in 1976 — 4 years of great pain, followed by over adecade of GOP control and sanity.
Posted by: O-BUM-YA | October 31, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
It’s funny when I hear people complaining about how much in taxes they have to pay according to the law, but when they donate to charity, they have absolutely no problem using that amount as a tax write-off.
Posted by: Ravenback47 | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Our family motto: “We will give until Hell freezes over, but we won’t be taken” We give of our time, talents and treasure to our church, our community and reputable charities. We do not support Gimmee Schemes/Scams or those who promote them. this means you, Obama!
Posted by: dorothy | October 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
How can Obama lecture about selfishness when his whole campaign is about tax cuts to the largest segment of our society. That segment of our society is foaming at the mouths for a few more bucks in the pocket. In my opinion this is tantamount to buying votes. This is the greatest hypocrisy. Chavez was elected in Venezuela by running a similar campaign, but to speak about selfishness then I challenge all Obama supporters to NOT vote for him because you’ll get a tax cut.
Posted by: ray | October 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Roy P: “TWO O’S DON’T SEEM TO KNOW IF THE DEDUCTION START @ 250k OR 200k OR 150k BUT GOD!!”
Yep, it happened again. Richardson, educating us on Obama’s plan, has now stated it is $120k that will receive a cut.
I can hear Obama now, under his breath … “Suckahs!”
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Ravenback with due respect you dont understand it. A tax is 100% paid for what is owed. MOST if not all charitable contributions enver provide any tax relief, and when they do, it is very little. Its a fraction of the value of the donation. But on that note, note that Obama and Biden — both millionaires — donated collectively less than $5000 in charity last year. And Obama’s Aunt is living in squalor in Boston. If this guy cant take care of his own family, do you really think he can help you? Please. THINK!
Posted by: O-BUM-YA | October 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Since obama is so keen on redistributing the wealth, he should have taken the money he spent on his horrid infomercial and spent it on his aunt and brother, both of whom live in slums while he has a mansion with a private beach in Hawaii
Posted by: Vote Obama!! | October 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Since obama is so keen on redistributing the wealth, he should have taken the money he spent on his horrid infomercial and spent it on his aunt and brother, both of whom live in slums while he has a mansion with a private beach in Hawaii
Posted by: Vote Obama!! | October 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Obama is missing the point entirerly. JFK lowered taxes… federal revenue went up. Carter raised taxes… revenue went down. Reagan lowered taxes… revenue went up. Same with Bush. Even clinten knew not to raise cap gains taxes. Think of walmart. Did they grow because of high prices or low prices. Low prices of course. They understood that low prices generate spending in their stores. If thye raised taxes, less customers. Same with taxes and economic growth. Use your head Obama. It isn’t about fairness, its about economic prosperity.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
The government has done nothing but waste taxpayers money. The Congress has passed pork bills for unnecessary projects to make the voters in their districts happy. They do this at the last minute so the public doesn’t get upset but then boast about in their districts. I find the hypocrisy of the Dems astounding. They take plenty of lobbyists money, including Obama, as evidenced by the Democratic Convetnion extravaganza. And now Obama has the gaul to call the taxpayer selfish. He is amazingly out of touch and is so typical of the tax and spend Democrat that loves to think they know what is best to do with OUR money. Remember it is OUR money, made with OUR sweat and work. The government responsibility is make taxes as low as possible to encourage savings and businesses. Obama and Democrats attitude is disgusting.
Posted by: jschmidt | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
See…what Barak and the rest of you Democrats apparently don’t realize is the #1 fundamental of Economics – and this is the #1 reason Barak has no clue how to fix our Economy. In fact, his statements simply prove he has no clue about Economics at all. You can only call it Obamanomics – a subject matter that isn’t taught in any educational institution in the world – because it doesn’t work.
Barak says “I want all of you to be rich” and “when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month…then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money…All boats rise.”
First rule of Economics…Supply and Demand. The more money everyone has to spend, the more in demand the products and services they are buying become. The more in demand these products and services become, the more they increase in cost. The end result is that the economy adjusts to everyone having more money.
What he’s not understanding is that the cost of living is the water the boat is floating on. If all boats rise, so does the cost of living. This is an Economic Law. The Law of Supply and Demand.
Obama’s idea SOUNDS good, but the bottom line is that the only result of this is that the cost of living will increase for everyone – so the poor will stay poor and the middle class will get poorer. Funny – he says he won’t raise the middle classes taxes, he’ll simply readjust the entire economy through the price increases caused directly by his “redistribution of wealth.” It will be a zero sum gain.
This is EXACTLY what caused the housing crisis. When the Clinton Administration “securitized” sub-prime mortgages with his revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act (see the Democratic “policy” theme here?), more people could buy homes – increasing the demand for housing – so the price of housing skyrocketed. When the economy ultimately adjusted, housing values crashed and millions of people couldn’t pay their mortgages and now the national average is that 1 in 7 homeowners actually owe more on their home than its worth. Oh yeah, and banks are failing and our economy collapsed because of it. This is what happens when “everyone’s boats rise.”
Economics 101. Obama doesn’t have a clue the damage he’s proposing. He didn’t learn a thing from the sub-prime housing crisis. If he’s elected and “redistributes the wealth” and “makes all ships rise,” watch what happens over the next 4-10 years, and don’t blame the Republicans for it when they are in office trying to clean up the mess it made. Blame yourself for voting for Obama.
In America – you have the opportunity to advance yourself. Everything you need is available to you, but to succeed in America, you have to work for it – you have to invest in yourself. Nothing against the poor, and I don’t have the statistics on it, but I’m willing to bet that a far higher percentage of people who live below the poverty line likely didn’t finish High School than those who did. They could have, but the CHOSE to drop out for one reason or another. They CHOSE not to get their GED. They CHOSE not to go to college – any college – community college or otherwise. I know this doesn’t fit everyone who’s poor, but like I said, I’m willing to bet that it fits the description of the majority of the poor people in America. Because they chose not to continue their educations, they aren’t qualified for the jobs that could have put them in the Middle Class. It’s sad – no doubt, but in most circumstances, they made the choices that limited their future options.
And don’t tell me that it can’t be done by the poor. It can be done – and I’m also living proof that a student can put themselves through college working 3 jobs and using financial aid. I EARNED a degree from a Big 10 University – and got a good job. Quit finding excuses as to why you can’t succeed – why you’ve been “held back.” Look in the mirror – if you want “wealth redistributed” because it will benefit YOU – get off your butt and do something to EARN it yourself instead of taking a handout from the Government – courtesy of those who worked hard to earn their way into the Middle and Upper Classes.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“McCain with his deceitfulness, short temper, and obligation to big business would take this country in the direction of overpopulation, ignorance, wars, hatred, death, starvation, and mass suffering.”
Good Lord………….What planet do you live on.
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
SINCERE APPLAUSE to Jake Tapper for being the ONLY journalist in America with professional ethics and integrity.
As for Obama, this is how liberals treat disagreement: character assassination.
Posted by: The Sisyphus Files | October 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Even if you take Sen Obama’s rhetoric at face value (I don’t) higer taxes starting at over 250k will kill small business. What sen Obama’s paln kills is the new start up companies that require millions of start up capital and can only get it by showing millions in profit (or no-one invests in the first place). Once Obama starts clubbing capital gains like baby harp seals investment in growth in this company grinds to a halt and the so does meaningful job creation.
Posted by: damage6 | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Selfish? I earn approximately what Biden earns and have given about 6x what he has to charity. Obama and Biden are generous…with other people’s money.
Posted by: K McGahey | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Recent Obama quotes:
“There’s no doubt that when it comes to our treatment of Native Americans as well as other persons of color in this country, we’ve got some very sad and difficult things to account for,”
“account for” means your money taken from you.
“I personally would want to see our tragic history, or the tragic elements of our history, acknowledged,”
So…several hundred thousand dying in the Civil War is not enough for Obama?
Who is going to apologize? Who alive today had anything to do with whatever element of the past Obama is referring to? This is called ‘white guilt’ which is meant to make you feel like it’s ok that your hard earned money goes to people who don’t work and spend your money on drinking booze, doing drugs, and getting girls pregnant.
‘show me the money’…
The ‘White Guilt’ industry, similar to the auto industry, and the hospitality industry, only in the white-guilt industry nobody produces anything besides guilt to conjure money out of peoples wallets like a street hustle.
“I consistently believe that when it comes to whether it’s Native Americans or African-American issues or reparations, the most important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just offer words, but offer deeds.”
“deeds” equals money. Your money. Flowing with ever increasing scope to those who choose to make excuses and blame and act irresponsible as opposed to being productive.
Perhaps the Democratic party should offer an apology for using boat loads of money in welfare, for ruining our inner cities with violence, destruction and sloth as promoted by welfare’s ‘free money’.
How about an apology for all the money used up in social services and police, and jails, and for all the innocent people assaulted, murdered and mugged with the highest crime rate being among those participating in this grand social experiment?
…waiting…
Posted by: paul | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Is not Obama selfish for not taking care of his half-brother who lives in squalor in a grass hut or his auntie Zietuni (he mentions in the book he wrote) in South Boston living in the projects?
Posted by: KrsnaDas | October 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
The DrudgeReport put a link to this article on the top of thier website. Hence all the angry wingnut (Greedy Old Party) responses here.
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
It’s sad that no one can talk about this issue without the offensive comments. The issue really is what is the role of Government and how what services they should provide. Reasonable people can disagree on this but we currently spend close to 600 billion on defense spending alone, as well as infrastructure, education, medicare, social security and the list goes on. We can cut back on many of these programs but then the States will have to make up the difference. We will pay on way or the other. Ever since the Reagan years we have embraced this theory that if we tax the rich less that it will “magically” spread around to the other people. Meanwhile the middle class at the end of the day has very little money left. (I will concede that many middle class people have put themselves in that position.) However the point is taxes are needed to run the Government and we as a Republic must decide how to distribute the tax burden. I think that the majority of people in this country feel that if your are fortunate enough to be very wealthy you can pay more. It either this or turn into a two class country.
Posted by: shane | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Can anybody, especially the mindless Obama sheeps, name one socialistic or communistic country that is thriving in economic prosperity??? …and this is the direction Barry wants to take our country into????
Posted by: diqiti | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
“Ahnold” is introducing John McCain!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Whether you’re for him, against him, or even independent…BO will always stink! Even in France!
Posted by: Phil | October 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Anybody who has been employed by a poor man please STAND UP! (excluding those who work for the government) What nobody? I am not surprised. Enough said!
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Judy, lets not forget when all this hatred started being spewed. It was after the 2000 election when all you liberals started screaming that the election was stolen. Even though every recount went the way of Bush, you never could accept that you lost. So, from that point on you and your leaders did everythink they could to tear this country down. You mocked our president, you mocked our military, you spouted hate at every conservative that dared open his mouth. Your leaders criticized our country not only on the floor of our congress but every time they went abroad.
So don’t start with your “Obama will bring us all together BS.” He has no intention of bringing us all together. His only intention is keeping the masses like you under the control of the few elites that will hold the power.
Posted by: BamaGuy | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
People making under $250,000 a year will pay LESS taxes under Obama than McCain. Don’t let the neocons lie to you.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: chris | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
“I believe Obama would help this country become a place that we would all get along…none of the dog eat dog competition polarization that is ruining the world. And no this country would not become a socialist…or communist one.”
Of course, we would Judy. I mean once Obama has silenced his critics through intimidation, legislation and other forms of white-collar, polite thuggery, there would be no one voicing opposition and everybody knows that once dissent is silenced – then we would all just magically get along.
Please, step this way ladies and gentlemen and ignore the oppression behind the curtain folks!
Posted by: b | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Rod, are you joking? You don’t understand the difference between the confiscation of your earnings by the government vs. being a cheerful giver. Think about that for just a moment. The fact that it can be written off is irrelevant. But in any event, I’d rather give my money to my charity of choice than have Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reem or Barney Frank buy votes with it
Posted by: Nobama | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Phil, thanks, he’s such a woman!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Judy, lets not forget when all this hatred started being spewed. It was after the 2000 election when all you liberals started screaming that the election was stolen. Even though every recount went the way of Bush, you never could accept that you lost. So, from that point on you and your leaders did everythink they could to tear this country down. You mocked our president, you mocked our military, you spouted hate at every conservative that dared open his mouth. Your leaders criticized our country not only on the floor of our congress but every time they went abroad.
So don’t start with your “Obama will bring us all together BS.” He has no intention of bringing us all together. His only intention is keeping the masses like you under the control of the few elites that will hold the power.
Posted by: BamaGuy | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Go ahead America, vote for the most unexperience liberal neophyte ever top run for president, and in two years the American Public will want to crusify their Messiah, because Obama lives in a dreamers world where everything is beautiful, THE USA is screwed for the next 2 years, and then when Obama falls and he will , we put Humpty Dumpty up high too high, and this guy has such hubris, he will fall, cause like all bad politicans, they believe their BS, AMERICA will wake up in 2 years and kick the Dems out because they will tax this country to death, welcome to a Depression brought to you by OBAMA PELOSI,. REID and Rangel.
Posted by: sickofliberalBS | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Welfare check day is the day that makes me most mad. I can go to any given grocery store and see someone in line using their welfare link card, which is all fine and dandy, then they walk outside carrying their new Louis Vuitton bag and put their free groceries into a brand new escalade. That is what my taxes are going to? Well no thank you to higher taxes.
Posted by: carrie | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Paul:
What is it about Obama that wants you to vote for him. No confrintation my friend, just curious?
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
The ant worked hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The shivering grasshopper saw this in the distance, demanding to know why the ant should be warm, cozy, and well fed, while his friends were miserable and starving. Rumors were going around the back lot and the media descended on the two like twin-engine plane storing pesticides. CBS, NBC and ABC showed up and provided pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a film of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food. The neighborhood was stunned by the sharp contrast. How could it be possible that a poor, humble grasshopper was allowed to suffer, while the filthy, rich ant satisfied its belly? One day, a black beetle came along and told the concerned insect population that he would do everything he could for the grasshopper–who was denied the basic right and food he deserved. In fact, he said the ant had gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and promised to call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share. The ant rebelled, but lost to the warring population. In the end, the grasshopper finished the last bits of the ant’s food while the ant decayed in the snow. Later that evening, the beetle was found dead in a hate related incident and the house, long since abandoned, was taken over by a gang of spiders who now terrorized the once peaceful neighborhood.
Posted by: phat_al | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
If Obama has read Atlas Shrugged or even heard of The Virtue of Selfishness, I’d be shocked.
Posted by: Jayemel | October 31, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Obama lives in a million dollar home and his treasured aunt lives in broken-down slum apartment in Boston… funny how he wants everyone else to give but wont do it himself. Hypocrite
Posted by: Eric NH | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
We are Obama…you will be assimilated. Resistance is futile. America…please fight the urge to join this control freak. I have no desire to learn a new language when he gives our country over to the Muslums. Oh I forgot…resistance is futile…”we will be assimilated”
Posted by: Loquitos | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Any people that got rich who didn’t do it on the backs of poor people please stand up. No one? No surprise.
Posted by: Nick | October 31, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
The bottom line is that we, as Americans, can no longer afford for the government to run deficits year after year. The idea of intentionally creating a budget (that the tax revenues don’t cover) is not responsible. Supply-side economics doesn’t work, and both political parties have failed to realize that over the years. If we’re going to keep taxes low, then we need to drastically cut back spending. That means that we have no business being in Iraq or Afghanistan. We need to cut back on Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security, the FAA, FDA, Dept. of Education, and everything else.
No one who favors low taxes really wants to talk about cutting back Federal spending across the board. They want to keep our troops overseas. If they are older, then they want to keep Social Security intact. Some people are hypocrites.
We all know on the individual level that you can’t spend more than you make—and if you take out a loan, you have to pay it back in a timely manner. The same thing is operative on a national level or a macroeconomic level. Our government cannot run year after year of deficits while idiots believe that lowering the tax rate will somehow increase tax revenues. It hasn’t worked during the five years that Bush has been doing it, and it wouldn’t work if we did it for another 50 years.
Either raise taxes or cut spending. Period.
Posted by: Fred | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
A lawyer with 2 years in the senate, a questionable background, no military or business experience and happens to read a teleprompter well is likely going to be the next president. A citizen who asked him a simple question about taxes has gone under more scrutiny from the mainstream media than he has.
Let’s be honest. Both parties have failed us. They have given us trillions in unfunded obligations (social security/medicare, etc), trillions more in debt and are incapable of working together. Look how divided we are as a nation compared to just a few years ago after 9/11. You can point the finger all you want at one party, but both parties are to blame. Each party has twisted the truth beyond recognition all in the name of getting elected. Hundreds of millions of dollars has been funneled from who knows where in to the campaigns (150 million in one month to Obama alone). The ends justifies the means, no matter what the consequence. It’s all abbout power and money – always has – always will.
Every four years, a bunch of talking heads tell us how horrible our lives are and that they are the ones to fix it. Well, what have they fixed? They have been talking about energy independence since the 70s, did it happen? They have talked about ending poverty since the great depression, did it end? They have talked about reducing healthcare costs and making college and everything more affordable – has any of those things happened? The only thing that has improved is the size of their wallets after they vote themselves a raise and write a book about how great they are.
People can be pushed only so far before the resentment builds to a boiling point. Look at the events leading up to the revolution and the civil war. The question for our future is which one will happen first.
Posted by: Citixen X | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
the tide is turning on obama now
No one wants a socialist/marxist leader
who will take your hard earned money and give it to the less fortunate.
worse yet, obama seems to want to change/alter the constitution. Say goodbye to all yours freedoms.
(starting with free speech)
Posted by: RS | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
liberals — if trickle down economics is such a joke, why do you think trickle down taxes will? So since the government is forcibly taking their money and giving it to poor people (after the government gets its cut) instead of them voluntarily investing it in the market or spending it, we all benefit? The only winner is the government. And what does the government want? Power. The less money we give to the government the less they can control our lives. In my book, that’s a good thing.
Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Judy,
Your KOOLAID mustache is showing.
Posted by: pchelli | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Judy, can’t beleive you are citing Idiocracy. That movie shows exactly what happens when you take incentive away from people and allow a singular beauacracy (government or company) make all of your decisions. When everyones on the dole, nothing gets done. Did you notice the medical care? Who wants to be a doctor when you’ll be taxed to oblivion. I know it’s only a movie but what a grat metaphor.
Posted by: Johhny Clash | October 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
From Page:
“Its about time you people give it up for keeping the african American people down all these years, And we haven’t forgotten about what you owe us for Slavery. Obama 2008 baby”
I’ll assume you’re serious about this, so I’ll go with it. Here is something serious for you to think about:
Read a bible (even if you’re not the religous type, there is a lot of wisdom there).
Jesus in all his teachings and life never once said or tried to get the person out of the ghetto. He tried to get the ghetto out of the person.
Until you get the ghetto out of you, that is where you will remain.
Giving you freebies is not the answer, starting with yourself is the only road to a better future for you and your family.
Peace
Posted by: Bob | October 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
People please don’t forget it was George Bush who caused all our problems. HIS unjust war with people who can barely make a living, the rise in gas prices and people being kicked from there homes just because they want to live the american dream. Don’t you people understand its liberals who make a differance in this country. Not stuck in the mud good ole boy republicans who just want to steal from children. Remember when George Bush cut school lunches. I remember.
Posted by: Ashley | October 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
I’ve been killing myself for the last 3 yrs getting my business off the ground. 6 or 7 days a week no benifits no holidays Nada. I’ve been fairly successful so no stimulus check either. Now if I can take it to the next level I should pay even more? I’m allready taxed twice on much of my earnings just for being a business owner. When you add up all my taxes state, fed, local, payroll etc. $0.48 of every dollar left after I meet payroll and expenses goes to taxes! If I grow and hire more people it will go up well over 60%. And this if fair?! This is patriotic?! Hell cut out the middle man and tell me who to send the wealfare check to Sen Obama. At least I’ll know who I’m helping and vice versa.
Posted by: damage6 | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Hey Nick:
Give me an example of someone in our life time who got rich on the backs of the poor. Not Since 1865 has someone been forced to work for someone against their will. By the way. Anyone can open a business.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Hey Nick:
Give me an example of someone in our life time who got rich on the backs of the poor. Not Since 1865 has someone been forced to work for someone against their will. By the way. Anyone can open a business.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
If Obama is elected, I will simply look forward to 2012, when Romney will run and, after the mess Obama makes of things, Americans will be begging for a competent executive. The Carter-Reagan cycle will repeat itself.
Posted by: Son of Rodin | October 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Helloooooo … Chris? Um. That tax figure was revised downward by Obama, Biden and now Richardson (video proof is all over the net).
Also, we’re not neocons, judging by the comments posted here. We are, however, conservative minds. Don’t be so quick to assume there aren’t Dems voting McCain. Ever hear of PUMAs? There’s a massive hub of them under names such as Just Say No Deal and Clinton Dems, etc. They are the ones behind Protest the Media Day. They’ve been hammering at the media to report on ACORN (media reaction was veeeery slow at first). I’m not part of that group, but I’ll tell you what, they are inspiring. They have more fight in them that you can imagine. And it’s all due to the fact they feel that their party has been hijacked and that now it will happen to their country. God bless them!
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“People making under $250,000 a year will pay LESS taxes under Obama than McCain. Don’t let the neocons lie to you.
Posted by: chris”
Chris, if your going to keep parroting the lefts talking points, you need to keep up with the ever changing numbers… were now down to 120k, and falling.
Posted by: PK | October 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“Kat is a perfect example of an arrogant liberal. She proudly promotes herself and talks about how wonderful her life is – drinking wine and such. And then states that if she were making 200,000 she would glad to give some back. ”
Point taken – I am proud and willing to pay the taxes that I pay. I am proud and willing to give to charities. I am proud that given my income of only 36,000/year I still give what I can of my wallet and give more of my time to charity. I did forget to mention that – thank you for calling me out on it… despite the arrogant comment which was uncalled for.
Posted by: kat | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I think it’s ridiculous the rich have to support the poor. What about those who don’t strive to be or do anything? The money taken from the rich in taxes to support the poor to “spread the wealth” should get to take it off as a 100% charitable contribution from their tax return! Supporting the poor like this is enabling. How else will they go and push themselves if they’re getting handouts! And to the fact that being rich is the American dream, well look where the American dream of home ownership got us! Thank you to the Dems who pushed for that!
Posted by: NoObama | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
When Dave Ramsey gives advice to people who are in debt, often it involves the taking of a second job to pay off debt. This is not uncommon when you want to pay off your house early, or whatever. But what will happen when that extra job is basically just being worked to pay taxes. That’s just one example. Progressive taxation should be focused on ways to tax wealth rather than income. Taxing income more just gives people a disincentive to work harder, work more, and produce more. In fact, I’m considering taking a second position part time right now to get more money to put onto the house.
Posted by: Joshua Orsak | October 31, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
JDK:
Weighing the candidates themselves, I’d take O over M for a lot of little things, issues, personalities, competence. If it’s any reflection as to how one would run a country, O’s campaign has been solid, on-messages and consistant. M’s has been a disjointed rollercoaster ride, a shambles.
As soon as M allied with the Bush’s gang of neocons, many of whom are heading his campaign, I knew which way I’d vote, regardless of the Dem candidate. I want those, whose philosophies have SO damaged our country, OUT!
Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
LouAnn: “If I was living in squalor like Obama’s half brother (I’ve seen the Vanity Fair pics of him and his shanty home) with a shot at asking for financial help from Obama, well, I’d say whatever Obama wanted me to say, too.”
Oh, please. That’s the classic “well, that’s what he would say if he was lying!” argument. It’s pathetic.
What actual evidence have you got that George Obama is lying in all these different interviews (I’ve quoted him from three different sources)? You’ve got nothing.
As far as his home goes, as he himself says: “They are comparing the way I live to the way he lives. They compare my world with his world. I have a good life. It’s not like I live in the gutter. I’m happy with the way I live.”
No doubt you’ll continue to be intellectually dishonest and dismiss that, since it must be a lie since it doesn’t match up with your assumptions. But I’d suggest you might find your arguments more persuasive if you try grounding them in reality.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Ashley and other liberals: A serious question, name one invention that did not arise from selfishness.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
This is my 4th or 5th kudo to Jake Tapper in as many weeks. Again, its so refeshing to see some balance from someone in the MSM. I think I’m in love lol
Posted by: Lori | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic,” Obama continued. “You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”
This is, I think, the stupidest statement anyone has ever made in regards to working people and the money they earn!
When I was young and untried, I worked at jobs that were so hard, most people would not have even done them. I worked 14 hour days, six days a week in the oil patch, was covered with oil and muck and earned $1.10 an hour for my effort. That was about $70.00 a week after taxes and for someone to say I was “selfish” to want to keep my money is beyond ridiculousness.
If Barack Obama gets to be president, we may as well get used to being in muck up to our chins! The definition of “Hoplessness” is “Barack Obama!” “Barack Obama” is also the definition of,”Stupidity!”
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
So, now it is selfish for me to want to keep as much of the money that I earn in my own pocket & not give it over to the government. The federal government was not set up to be a charitable organization & I am tired of these liberals wanting to set it up as such. If they want to help the poor then they can start by writing checks out of their own accounts & quit trying to raid mine.
Posted by: GreggF | October 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Vote for who you want but the last time I checked we all live in America. You have the right to not support the next president. However I just sat through 8 years being called “unAmerican” for not supporting Bush. I could be angry and bitter like most of the the people writing here. I’m not. Thats politics and I am going to refrain from calling my Republican friends “unAmerican” while they criticize President Obama.
Posted by: shane | October 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
By taking from the job creators and giving to the under achievers Obama will destroy the American Dream along with the American economy. What good is it to get a $1500 check if you have no job? Once again, the liberals will devastate the ones they want to help the most! (Think: Social Security, War on drugs, War on poverty, Community Reinvestment act and now “spread the wealth around”)
Posted by: James Kolinsky | October 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Let me see, you want me to continue to work my backside off to make people who don’t take risks and don’t work hard rich? 46% of the people currently pay no taxes, and right now I am paying 40% plus in taxes!!! This is ridiculous.
Of course things are going to get nasty at the end of this race, per Obama’s comment; he is a nasty slick operator, a thug in a pin stripe suit. A man who has had close ties with convicted criminals, like Tony and Bernadette…and avowed Marxist socialist like Bill Ayers who thought it was a really terrific idea to blow up public servants and public buildings because those institutions did not agree with him. Hey, now there is a novel political thought!
Obama’s leadership and management skills are scant….no meaningful legislation – ever, unless you think killing a baby born alive in spite of an abortion is “meaningful”. Obama couldn’t even vote YES or NO when he was in the Illinois Senate…he could only vote PRESENT. And for TWENTY years (20 years) he didn’t notice that one of his very best friends was a racist, the Reverend Wright. So does this mean Obama doesn’t listen carefully? Or doesn’t care if people are racists? Or agrees with Wright?
And in the US Senate he couldn’t show up on time for hearings, when he showed up at all. And, shall we talk about his leadership of the Project Vote arm of Acorn? 5 hours of testimony this week by a former Project Vote employee was sickening in the details of how this group has attempted to subvert the one person, one vote ethic.
Yeah….with Obama in the race things are already nasty.
Posted by: Yeeeech | October 31, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Yo! Right wing nutjobs! You’ve ruined our party!
The era of Reagan and Bush is over! Get over it!
Welcome to Obama, who will be fair to all Americans not just the selfish rich!
Posted by: Middle Class Republican | October 31, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Anyone notice that Obama supporters have to post more than once the same thing. I think they are scared that the truth is starting to sink in that OBAMA IS BAD FOR AMERICA! Tony Rezko, Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, PLO spokesman, Odinga who wants to institute Sharia law in Kenya. Look who Obama pals around with…bad news.
Look at when he had a Freudian slip that George had to correct…my Muslim faith. Don’t you mean your Christian faith. Oh that’s right.
Obama has never heard of the 80/20. 20 percent of individuals have 80 percent of the wealth. What I think is that it might be Obama and colleagues have 80 % of the wealth while the rest of the country has 20 % This world will never be 100% rich or even 50/50
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“If you make more than 250k a year and you’re so concerned with keeping all the extra income you earned when you should have been donating time, money, and care into the country and its people to begin with, then yes, you are being selfish.
Instead its dodging taxes, hording finances for elite bonuses, and eagerly watching your bank balance rise, contribute to the country that gave you this opportunity for success. Its not all about you and your money.”
This is typical mindset of liberal idealists. I worked 10 years in manufacturing operations mgt. and have spent the past 6 working as a consultant to commercial and government clients (after paying my way through undergrad and grad school, NO GOVT. ASSISTANCE!). After working with government clients, it is SHOCKING to witness how much WASTE there is in government agencies. And now I’m being called “selfish” because I don’t want to fund this WASTE??? How about the U.S. government demanding fiscal responsibility for its expenditures? Are those government workers who are unproductive (or lazy) “selfish” for wasting tax payer money?
Instead of taxing us more, how about spending less???
Posted by: tjp8 | October 31, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Kat cares so much, in fact, that she wants to go into the polling booth Tues (if she hasn’t already) and choose the fate of your take-home pay. Instead of you having the choice, she wants to leave it to the govt.
The same govt that has already too many entitlement programs that are already broken.
She believes that the govt can do a better job of taking care of the poor than, say, my charity of nuns, who take a vow of poverty. If only Pelos(ki) would be that giving.
Kat and others like her (+ ACORN’s Mickey Mouse) will vote for Obama, and I’ll have less take-home pay to donate to my Richmond, Va, charity. I’ll still give 10%, but it will be 10% of less take-home.
Thanks, Kat. Thanks for “thinking” this one out.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
You got it right Dave, we’re cut from the same cloth. I myself put myself through college to graduate as a Mechanical Engineer while I was married and my wife was pregnant. I was a child in a family of five where the household income was 11,000 dollars a year. When I became old enough to work, the income went to about 20,000 dollars a year. My younger brother on the other hand dropped out of school because he’s chasing the quick money right now. People drive themselves to where they go, if free stuff is handed to them (like in the case of my spoiled younger brother) less is achieved. If you have to work for what you get, you work harder to achieve more.
Obama wants to tax the rich and redistribute to the poor. We had a lesson on giving free money to the poor, remember Katrina? Of all of those debit cards given, how many were used for things that they were meant for? Sure the money was spent, it was spent on guns, drugs, strippers, and all sorts of other illegal activities. That’s what happens when money is given to the poor.
Now if you give the breaks to businesses, like McCain suggests, you can talk about greed as well. You can say that the companies will hog up all of the money and not pass the savings to their customers or to their employees and that would be a valid argument. But if you tax the companies, wouldn’t that mean that the greed would cause the companies to cut jobs or increase cost to the customer? A greedy business is a greedy business and if you try to punish the greed by taxing them, you are only passing the taxation off to the poor who see it in less hours or higher prices. SO who is it that Obama is really taxing? Is 1000 dollars extra at the end of the year really worth quite possibly more in increased goods and services?
Think about it this way. If you make minimum wage, all that a business has to do is cut your hours by 3 every week and you have made less money than what you got with the tax plan. If you make more money (lets say 10 dollars an hour) then you end up losing more money per cut hour. So where’s the benefit in that?
Personally speaking from a working college student’s point of view, I would rather have more hours given per week to work or better opportunities for promotions and pay increases than a few hundred dollars at the end of the year. I would rather earn my rewards than receive them because I voted for a faulty tax plan.
Posted by: Hoosier | October 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Paul:
I must say that I too am not thrilled with M. However, I do believe very much so in balanced government. O, Polocie and reied is a scary combo. I view mcain as somewhat of a stop gap.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
“kat, socialists do not take from the rich to make the poor rich, they take from the rich and the rich become poor along with the poor, they’re all at the poorhouse and then nobody has a hope of raising themselves up from it. That’s how they control you. You’re a fool. In 2 years, if Obama wins, you won’t even admit you voted for the Communist.”
a. socialism and communism are 2 very different styles of government. b. No one is taking more from the rich than they are able to give. I will argue that the country needs a restructuring of public spending – this is legitimate. BUT spending on the welfare of the whole must come from taxes and if promoting a tax cut for the middle class and poor by offsetting it with a tax increase for the wealthiest 2% will increase spending and rebound the stock market then it will actually end up benefiting the rich in the end anyway. You all need to look long term and stop basing all your reactions on a short term fear of the unknown. Think about it, a middle class family takes in an extra 1,500.00 a year from a tax break… what about that scenario makes you think that family won’t spend the money on something like a vehicle upgrade or a few extra nights out to dinner, or a nice big holiday celebration? The money goes right back into the system and pumped back into the accounts of the 2% anyway. It makes the most sense and I’m sorry you all just can’t see that.
Posted by: kat | October 31, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I don’t mind paying taxes but I detest the way they spend my hard-earned money. If they would quit wasting so much of the taxpayer’s money they would have enough to run the government and pay down the debt.
Posted by: xmaniac | October 31, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Middle Class Republican, be honest and change your REAL party to dem
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Share the wealth? Obama’s aunt andd uncle living in poverty despite his talk about “I am my brother’s keeper, my sister’s keeper?” Now is it selfishness when you OBAMA is running around the country, you’re rushing from place to place, you’re preaching redistribution of wealth, you’re preaching materialism, you’re promising money to people who contribute nothing in taxes. Are all those people who want something for nothing, who you are pandering to, are they selfish, Barry? Are these people selfish? Are they sitting around waiting for you to take somebody else’s money to give to them? Would you call them selfish after you call McCain and Palin selfish? After you call capitalism selfish? Who’s selfish?
Posted by: xiu | October 31, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Who pays the bulk of the taxes in the USA? less than 10% of the taxable pay more that 25% of the tax intake in the USA – What was that about the rich need to pay more? How’s about a flat rate tax where we all pay the same percentage? Flippin’ liberal nut cases! Let’s get our facts straight!
Posted by: Carl | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
plainsm: LuAnn, Judy is probably 13
Didn’t she star in that Youth Sings for Obama video?
Went something like this …
He’s gonna change it …
We-awange it …
Obama’s gonna change da world.
[Creeeepy like that Nazi song in Cabaret.]
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS. The total annual expenditures on refundable “tax credits” would rise over the next 10 years by $647 billion to $1.054 trillion, according to the Tax Policy Center. This means that the tax-credit welfare state would soon cost four times actual cash welfare. By redefining such income payments as “tax credits,” the Obama campaign also redefines them away as a tax share of GDP. Presto, the federal tax burden looks much smaller than it really is.
Posted by: jschmidt | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
2 things:
1) If I am selfish for not wanting to pay MORE taxes, then how selfish are the 56% of the Americans who pay NONE. And the 50% of THEM who actually TAKE from the rest of us?
2) I am voting for trickle down wealth, not trickle up poverty. Check out every state that has raised taxes,regulation, and unions… and ask yourself if you want to end up like, say, Michigan. Or look at European nations and what happens to their economies when they vote in leaders who lower taxes and regulations.
Posted by: Perspective | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS!! AMERICANS, WAKE UP!
OF COURSE the wealthy should be helping the less wealthy….but who wants the government telling us where it should go, how much, etc??? THe more we are taxed, the less we have to give to charity and those we want to help. AND UH, BARACK, how about helping your poor aunt in public housing??? He’s quick to want to spread YOUR money, but won’t help his aunt?
BTW, I gave more to charity in one year than Biden gave in ten years (3,600 dollars) on his 2.9 million dollar salary. And I’m a sccial worker. Not big bucks.
!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: elsa | October 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
If Obama is so for redistributing wealth, why doesn’t he start practicing what he’s preaching. He’s the one with all the money is his campaign, and look at poor old McCain, slaving away and not able to raise any more money. Obama just needs to follow his own advice and make the check payable to “McCain for President.”
Posted by: tj | October 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
“Obama says “I AM my brother’s keeper” yet his own brother lives in a hut in Kenya and tries to survive on less money than the average American spends on beer. Some keeper!’
LOL!!!
Posted by: plainsm | October 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Middle Class Republican: Community Party USA would be a good fit for you. They also endorsed Obama.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Yeah right, the “benevolent” Barack Obama is gonna take care of everyone — when he doesn’t even take care of his own family: including his ACTUAL BROTHER living in a hut on $1 a month somewhere in Africa, and his ACTUAL AUNT living in a SLUM in Boston.
How’s that for hypocrisy? The sleazy, lying, deceitful hypocrisy of the radical power-hungry left.
This guy has no vision, no good intentions, no credibility. This is a bad guy.
Obama is a nothing but a self-serving power-starved control-freak elitist Marxist radical who wants totalitarian rule — with him ruling, of course.
Posted by: Riki Tiki | October 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Middle Class Republican: COMMUNIST Party USA would be a good fit for you. They also endorsed Obama.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
As I read Obama’s comments I can only shake my head and wonder what kind of dream land this man is in. His plan is not going to work because he doesn’t realize how the working class heirarchy operates. Oh well, the country need a good education now and then, and boy, are we going to get it. But then, how much damage could he do in four years?
Posted by: kpro | October 31, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
My older brother chose to live a lazy life. After school, he never did much homework and his grades showed it. He was always hanging out with his friends & going to parties. I’d have loved to enjoy all the cool things he did too, but our parents’ training stuck with me while my brother resisted them at almost every turn. I studied hard and did more than my share of the chores around the house because he wouldn’t.
We both got to go to college where he took the easiest possible major, but still got kicked out of his fraternity for drinking and partying too much (I didn’t think that was possible!). I double-majored in the two hardest degrees I could handle – Physics and Engineering.
He ended up working for our dad who made the down payment on his house but not mine. My brother repaid him by stealing from him and cheating with the secretary on Dad’s dime. I never needed any handouts from my parents.
When Dad died, my long-divorced brother moved back in with mom and mooched off her till he wore her out a few years later. Even so, Mom split her remaining assets 50/50 between us (mainly her 75-year old house that needed major work). My brother didn’t lift a finger to help my wife and I with all the work of repairing & prepping her house for sale – work that cost us tens of thousands of dollars and months of personal time – even though my brother benefited equally when it sold for over twice its original estimate. In retrospect, I wish I’d just sold it as is.
I’m not wealthy – I spent my career in the auto industry and have lost a lot of income from being unemployed through the many tough times. I’ve got no pension coming – just my 401k savings. I’ll be working many more years to pay my home off – if I can find work here again. Things are tough, but everything I’ve got I earned by working hard for it, plus a little from my inheritance.
Here’s my point – Obama looks at my brother’s neediness and then says to me, “Dan, he’s “BEHIND” you – so you need to give him some of what you got – you’ve got to share your wealth!”
Who is Obama (or any Democrat) to re-distribute my earnings to those who have less because they chose not to work as hard? They’ve got their memories of all the fun times they enjoyed when I was working hard. There are consequences to every decision anyone makes – but now Obama & his friends want to make all the consequences disappear with their magic redistribution wand. Well there is no Santa Claus and redistribution doesn’t work either. The only incentive for working hard is to be able to keep the fruits of your labors. “Redistribution” is communism (pure & simple) and no intelligent person believes in that any more.
If Obama wins, I’ll kiss what’s left of America as I’ve known it goodbye and be looking for a place to live that values and rewards hard work.
Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Wow. So now after I worked hard all my life, accumulated vast debt for a business education and finally have the chance to be rewarded, I am selfish for wanting to keep what I earn – or maybe be able to pay off a student loan or two. If I did it so can any other person. This is a new low for America. Yeah – leave your fat ass on the couch and just expect a hand out. Other people will work hard for you, we wouldn’t want you to sacrifice like the rest of us. Talk about audacity. VOTE OBAMA ITS EASIER THAN WORKING.
Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
An answer to William Dougherty: Not sure if it would be feasible but try this on for size: Apportion the annual cost of the federal budget to each citizen based on their income (or maybe on their wealth???) Each pays in proportion to what they own.
Citizens of our country mainly own what they do because they have been lucky enough to be born here or to have made their way here. If they can’t make the connection than they may not be selfish but certainly ungrateful.
Posted by: EastIdaho | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
McCain does not want to pay higher taxes and yet wants to continue spending 12 billion dollars a month in Iraq. Wake up America. Do want to continue borrowing money from China to finance 2 wars?
Posted by: win | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Let me put it this way to my friends that think “the rich” will only get socked with this $250k tax deal of Obama’s (or is it $200k? (Obama last week) or is it $150k? (Biden this week in PA), or is it $130k (Gov Richardson today)).
I own a small retail specialty business that barely provides a living for myself and family (less than $100k after I pay my expenses). So if Obama’s tax deal holds I will get a tax break….WONDERFUL. But wait…
All my suppliers are $250k+ companies. Therefore the tax increase ON THEM WILL CAUSE THEM TO RAISE THE PRICES I PAY FOR PRODUCT. That means I can
1) Raise my prices to offset my increased cost. Thereby passing the increase on to my customers.
2) Layoff employees (I hire only 8 right now) to make up for supply increases and keep my prices the same (unlikely as I already work 7 days a week, 10+ hours a day).
3) Take the hit in my own wallet so I can keep my employees and prices (NOT happening being as I wont work for free or kill myself for less).
So I guess some of you Libs will say Im selfish. Why…because I have worked my butt off for 5 years to build up a business, and now Im being told to “spread the wealth”? Why? Everyone in this country has the opportunity to do what I have done…with their own blood, sweat and tears. I wasnt born rich (I am the son of a US ARMY enlisted man).
So you see…one way or the other…Obama’s tax plan will hit YOU the consumer. EIther in increased prices, layoffs, or in the end I go out of business.
Economics 101 folks….
Posted by: faamecanic | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I can identify with what you say, DJ, and I sympathize but it only takes a generation of one to become rich. Cindy McCain’s wife was penniless, Arnold Schwarzenegger was penniless. It’s up to you, not government, to get you up the ladder. Think of a guy like Bill Gates. He was just one of tens of thousands of people who ask themselves two questions: how do I make a buck and, consequently, what do people really need? If you figure out what people need, you can supply them with that and make money. So “greed” isn’t opposite to “service.” That’s the problem a lot of people have when they think of Capitalism. No one ever got rich producing something no one wants and needs.
Posted by: pxfagonard | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Carl, why is your name on my post?
Posted by: xiu | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
This is all about extorting money from whitey. End of argument. Nonwhites are economic parasites. EVERYONE knows this.
They try to shut the white middle class up by calling us racists, ignorant etc LOL!
The economy is imploding along with political correctness. Whites are getting fed up. Race war.
Posted by: janzer | October 31, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
This is to Jake who posted at 5:47pm
Jake is one of the new Younger voters. He’s alright, but doesn’t have 50 years of life experience on this Earth, and was conned.
Obama has been media spun, presented in a bright wholesome manner, and he is physically handsome. He speaks with no dialect. Has a great smile and sounds intelligent enough. Almost moderate at times.
In reality under the Facade he is more like Jessie Jackson, Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton, and Karl Marx.
This is really gonna be something to see. I hope you all enjoy it.
Posted by: MichaelAngelo | October 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
“I think it’s ridiculous the rich have to support the poor…”
I agree. People forget it’s the rich who hire the poor and pay them a wage for doing a job. There’s nothing wrong with being rich. I wish I were rich. I give a buck or two to some of the poor people who stand on the street with a sign saying they are hungry. My wife says most of them aren’t hungry, they just get money that way. I say,”Yeah, but what if they are hungry-and what’s a buck or two anyhow?
But no one is going to force me to give the guy a buck; that’s my idea!
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Oh, Jozsef, do I hear a bit of class envy?? Earned or not, it is still THEIR OWN money, is it not??
Posted by: jackson | October 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Take it from the departed C.S. Lewis about men like Obama and their ideas. And Lewis was about a billion times more intelligent than “THE ONE.”
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Posted by: Tex Taylor | October 31, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Carl. Apologies for a genuine mistake on my part regarding name on post
Posted by: xiu | October 31, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
USA troubles abroad, economic troubles at home, just the right time for a Demagogue to emerge, and just the right time for you to fall for him. Beware
Posted by: emetic | October 31, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
jozsef-
A lot of lazy people would leave me struggling to deem their needs my problem.
Posted by: JAS | October 31, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
To those who think a socialism goverment is going to more for you. Think again! It’s just another form of slavery but now your slavemaster is the goverment. Watch out folks. Slavery can soon comeback. Just look @ venezuela mr.chaves spending tax payer money launching new spy sattelite & yet his people are starving for basic needs. Welcome to socialism year 2008. NO OBAMA for 2009
Posted by: Anti-Socialist | October 31, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
cats out of the bag…. the MSM been skewing the polls bigtime….CNN says Obama has clinched….. WRONG!!!…GET OUT AND VOTE REPUBS THE POLLS ARE BS…
BIG MAC IS LEADING IN EARLY VOTING IN CALIFORNIA….FACT!!!!!!
Posted by: Noel | October 31, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
xmaniac:
Socialism has been an utter failure! Governments are not the way to create wealth, they confiscate it. Just look at most of the former socialist governments of Europe; France and Germany have thrown out their socialist governments and the UK is about to.
Government is the very worst method for supplying services to the people. The free market has shown itself to be much better way to get people healthcare and now even packaged mail. Where governments have taken over basic industries, those industries have failed. Just look at what is happening in Venezuela. There Chavez had nationalized their oil companies and now they are facing the worst economic crisis since the middle 70s.
Socialism has been just an unmitigated failure as communist governments. Intellectuals love socialism because they are elitists who like to control everything; and fail every time they do.
Posted by: p | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Everyone blames Bush, but the President does NOT make law! The President can sponsor a bill (that may or may not become a law) or veto a bill after it’s been through the Congress, but he does NOT make law. The responsibility for the creation of laws is that of Congress. And interestingly, Congress has a 16% approval rating – while Bush’s approval rating is 26%. Now for the kicker – the Congressional majority is Democrats! So, we have a Democratic Congress with a 16% approval rating that is responsible (but not accountable – Bush gets that honor) for the past 2 years of miserable failures, including the financial meltdown! Embolden and empower an inept Congress by electing an inexperienced junior Senator with far-left viewpoints? Not me – I’m proudly voting for McCain/Palin in 2008!
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Everyone blames Bush, but the President does NOT make law! The President can sponsor a bill (that may or may not become a law) or veto a bill after it’s been through the Congress, but he does NOT make law. The responsibility for the creation of laws is that of Congress. And interestingly, Congress has a 16% approval rating – while Bush’s approval rating is 26%. Now for the kicker – the Congressional majority is Democrats! So, we have a Democratic Congress with a 16% approval rating that is responsible (but not accountable – Bush gets that honor) for the past 2 years of miserable failures, including the financial meltdown! Embolden and empower an inept Congress by electing an inexperienced junior Senator with far-left viewpoints? Not me – I’m proudly voting for McCain/Palin in 2008!
Posted by: Scott | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
“This election will finally put someone in the White House who will give reparations to every black in America for the hundreds of years of slavery of blacks. It’s time for white people to pay up! ”
The only pay you will get from me is one .357 slug at a time….come get some!
Posted by: faamecanic | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I think it’s always a good idea to give the federal government as much money and authority over our lives as possible.
Posted by: The Bub | October 31, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
I, too, was smitten with the eloquence and the “passion” and the rhetoric of Obama when I first heard him speak. I looked at my husband, and I said “Wow! He “sounds” really good…..just what this country needs.
THEN……my husband, who served in the Army, pulled me aside and basically told me Obama is a creep. I started listening to what I could, but soon was turned off by the media’s obvious bias (i.e. Charlie Gibson’s condescending attitude, etc.)
I finally figured out that unless you do your OWN soul searching and research, anyone could fall for Obama’s deception.
Mind you, I am 56 years old. Just what the heck are these younger people (i.e. college kids) and others hearing? I assume they got to the first phase of listening to these candidates, and stopped right there.
I think if McCain had the past associations that Obama has, the Democraps would be SCREAMING!
How can we so quickly forget 9/11 that we don’t even FLINCH about the fact that Obama has mentioned his “Muslim faith,” the 57 states in the USA (relates to Muslim states.) his 20 year
association with the whoremonger Jeremiah Wright, who damns America and white people, his associations with all kinds of shady people, etc….one who feels he “didn’t do enough” in bombing our country. And don’t forget ACORN! The aforementioned things ALONE should raise some questions, but no….those in love with Obama can’t see what he will do to this country.
Obama mentions that we should be our brother’s keeper, yet he allows his own family to live in poverty.
Obama has spent kazillions on this campaign. I am sure he would do the same when elected, and guess who will pay for it? (By the way, he LIED about receiving campaign money….how many lies will he tell if he gets in office?
He wants to eliminate Bush’s tax cut? Don’t you know what that will mean for you individually? Apparently not.
Check out http://www.maps.google.com/maps and look at Obama’s credentials. And you have the nerve to say Palin is not qualified? She is more qualified than Obama! Besides, she is not running for the highest office. and how about Biden? now THAT’S a joke!
Look how obama has banned two TV stations because they asked some hard-core questions. Look how his campaign has attacked the common person (like you and me) named Joe the Plumber? He will do the same thing to all the rest of us. He will ban talk radio and our freedom of speech because it disagrees with HIS agenda!
He says the Republicans don’t value human life because the kill the innocent (in wars, etc.) but it’s because of wars that we can PROTECT the innocent. And I guess that means aborted babies are not considered innocent.
He sure protects the Roe vs. Wade decision, yet wants to abolish the second amendment. How can this moron consciously take the oath of office, when the President is suppose to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. He has even commented that the Constitution is flawed.
And talk about negative campaigning, have you ever heard Oblahma say anything positive about our country? I sure haven’t.
He received all this money for his campaign. He should give some to McCain, who doesn’t have as much! Oh wait? but that’s HIS hard earned money…. makes a difference, doesn’t it?
These people who are so smitten with Obama don’t even know what his policies are, or why they are voting for him. Howard Sterns video on the “Harlem vote”
(do a google search for it and you ill find it) completely tells it all.
As Obama is hailed as the savior of America it’s clear that the misguided in our country are ready to live under a new America. The America that Obama and his liberal colleagues have longed for; a socialist America. The Communist Party has already declared victory as Obama nears the finish line.
It’s clear that Americans understand that a vote for Obama is a vote against freedom. A vote for Obama is a vote for government. Not just the big government that we are used to, but a much worse government.
The new government under Obama and a democratic controlled congress will be socialism at it’s finest.
But you already know that. That’s why you are voting for him. You want socialist universal health care. You want liberal judges on the Supreme Court so that they can push the socialist agenda from the highest court in the land. You want to redistribute or as Obama says, “spread the wealth” in America just as the communists before you did. You want to continue killing innocent babies on a daily basis. You want your rights slowly taken away in the name of fairness. You want God replaced by the religion of Environmentalism.
For once I am thankful my parents have passed away. Seeing what has happened with the American people being so brainwashed with their Messiah would absolutely shock them.
On Election Day I will cast my vote for John McCain. If Obama wins I fear for the future of America. I foresee me sitting down with my children years from now and telling them how great America once was.
Posted by: cant9562 | October 31, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
I would like to ask Barack Obama about spreading the wealth of that $750,000 he spent on lighting alone when he was in Berlin speaking to Germans this summer
Posted by: xiu | October 31, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Actually Freddie, if anyone needs to pay, it is your own ancestors in Africa who sold your fellow blacks to the white slave traders. Oh wait, that’s right, they have no money…
Here’s a better idea- how about you blacks pay the descendants of the whites who brought your ancestors over here as slaves (assuming you actually ARE descended from slaves). After all, all of the descendants of slaves are living in a country that gives them the greatest opportunity to make something of themselves- something EVERY OTHER group of immigrants to this country learned very quickly, and took advantage of! Maybe you can pay back big bucks to those descendants of the slaveholders for their wisdom in bringing your ancestors over here!
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Enough already!!!! I’m so tired of these polls trying to persuade everybody to vote Obama.
Economic Justice?
Spread the wealth around?
Barack Hussein Obama?
President?
When Pigs with Lipstick Fly!!!!
Wake up people. This radical needs to be taught a lesson. Vote for this country on Tuesday, not what the media wants you to think is the popular choice.
Posted by: DAve Nnnemacher | October 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I think Obama is presenting a beautiful and accurate perspective on socialism. This country has been so ridiclously afraid of socialism for no reason. Finally, we have politician who can take us down this path to sharing. If sharing works well in the family, we all need to grow up and begin sharing all the wealth this nation has. Fortunately, Barrack is going to make this possible.
Posted by: Red | October 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Watching Arnold Schartzenegger was amazing, ex.spelling) He was so inspiring and I believed everything he said. I have totally am going to VOTE MCAIN, without fail. I am a Senior and I believe that when he said that OBAMA, would treat Social Security as welfare, and he would also tax us. in order to pay for Medicare. The death tax is going to be raised to 49%, half of your inheritence that you leave your love ones, and half for the State. Seniors do no let this happen stand up and fight for your Rights, wake up and don’t let a sweet talker, give away everything you worked for. God BLess MMCAIN, I believe him he will fight for us, believe it. Wall st. Said they are donating millions of dollars to the DEMS. of course birds of a feather flock together they are the ones who corrupted our GOVT. They are afraid of MCCAin, because he will slamm them if he becomes President, they are probably shaking in their pants. Good for MCCAIN and PALIN. com on Seniors, you choose the next president. GO MCCAIN/Palin
Posted by: OMGptl | October 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Freddie: “It’s time for white people to pay up!”
Rev. Wright just called and would like to interview you for the Asst. Pastor of Hatred and Misinformation position.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I’m glad to give to the poor. I just want it to be my decision. I feel good when I give to someone in need. I don’t feel good when Uncle O’Sam takes my money from me without my say so and gives it to whomever he thinks is deserving.
So, he’s right, we ought to give to the poor, but robbing me of the opportunity to do it on my own dime and own time also robs me of the benefit of giving.
Posted by: tj | October 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
We should be able to indicate what percentage of our tax returns we want allocated to what purpose. Set up the categories on our tax returns, then record the returns and allocate the tax revenues accordingly.
Posted by: Obie | October 31, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Wow. Now I am selfish. What a load of crap.
Posted by: Kyle | October 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
plainsm: “Obama says “I AM my brother’s keeper” yet his own brother lives in a hut in Kenya and tries to survive on less money than the average American spends on beer.”
Well… duh. The average American spends quite a lot on beer and the per capita income in Kenya is $1200. It’d actually be quite easy to survive in Kenya on the average American’s beer money.
Regardless, George Obama is quite happy. Here’s what the Times (UK) reported about him;
“He said that he was furious at subsequent reports that he had been abandoned by the Obama family and that he was filled with shame about living in a slum. “It seems there are people who want to destroy me and my family,” he said.
“They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”"
I think I’ve seen one or two of those people commenting here today… ;-)
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Do you really think the most liberal Senator backed by Daily Kos and MoveOn.org and his Democratic cronies in Congress are going to have enough money taxing only those that are making over 250k? Baloney! He and the Dems are lying. With control of Congress and the Presidency they can do anything they want to increase taxes. Every analysis of his tax plan says there is not enough money to pay for his programs. If you wont; for him you will have higher taxes. You may have your 401k dropped substituted with a forced 5% savings with 3% return that will most likely be counted is income to the government so they can balance the budget with it. Obama is lying.
Posted by: jschmidt | October 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Vote for Obama and get your “free gubment cheese”
Posted by: Angela | October 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
So what we seem to have is a bunch of old white people and some similar younger ilk against the rest of the world. Wake up there on the Right the 20th Century is over. You don’t dominate the world anymore.
“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”
Posted by: Roger | October 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
In short, Obama says that those of us who are middle class and far from rich are selfish for not wanting to pay more taxes to support his welfare programs? Maybe liberals forgot, but not one of their welfare programs over the last 45 years has worked, not one. It isn’t just about taxes either. It is about the federal courts. It is about personal responsibility. It is about this country getting out of the “everyone is a victim” mentality. Barrack Obama is a socialist who thinks the federal government has the answer to everything. Conservatives believe people have their own answers if given the chance to figure it out. Add to the fact that Obama embraces terrorists, is a racist (“my grandmother, a typical white person”). Factor in Pelosi with her San Francisco values and Harry Reid with his intoerance and hate. Add it all up and you have a perfect storm for the weakening of America.
Posted by: Conservative Jim in California | October 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Angela says, “Vote for Obama and get your ‘free gubment cheese.’”
Oooh, I could see that on a bumper sticker!
That and “Pelosi – Obama – Reid: Axis of Taxes”
Any others?
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
In response to the person who said: “If you think that’s fine, then you should vote to continue these same failed policies. But if you’re not in the top 1% of wage-earners (which is about $1.5 million/year), then you should take a look at Obama.”
__________________
I did take a look at him, and nearly threw up!
You liberals all **** about the money being spent on the war. Obama will get us into MORE problems once all these countries who want to wipe us off the face of the earth are done with America under Obama’s presdiency. You young people better think again before voting for Oblahma. Have you ever heard of the DRAFT??? I know a lot of ex military people who have said there is NO WAY they would ever serve in the military with Obama as commander in chief..
Posted by: cant9562 | October 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Unfortunately Mr. Obama is part of what I call the “now” generation. I want this now, I deserve this now!. I’m sorry but my grandparents came from an Arab land about 100 years ago. They did not expect things. The only thing they wanted was freedom. They worked hard so their offspring would have a better life than they did. My parents did the same, often pushins off purchases to make sure they had enough money for necessities, a rainy, day, their retirement, and their kids college education. Only after this was satisfied did they take cruises and nice vacations. Today, though, everybody seems to want the entire oyster now. I’m sorry, it’s not being selfish if you want to jeep the money you or your parents worked so hard for. This class envy is destroying this country. If you want wealth, work hard to get it for either you or your children. And everybody has a chance in this country. That’s what makes it great. There have been too many people who have had a good idea or who took a chance who are now sucessful, both groups working hard, to claim it isn’t so.
Posted by: Jack | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
History Lesson: In the late 1950′s most Cubans thought Cuba needed a “Change”, and they were right. So when a young, dynamic leader came along, every Cuban was at least receptive. When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press fell in love with him. They never questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in. He said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, and everyone followed. He said he would bring justice and equality to all, and everyone said “Praise the Lord!” The young leader said “I will be for change, and I’ll bring you change,” and everyone yelled “Viva Fidel!” But by the time the executioner’s guns went silent, the people’s guns had been taken away. By they time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were working for him. By the time the change was implemented Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third World status. By the time the change was over more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes. Luckily, we in America would never fall for a young leader who promised change without asking “what change?’ Would we?
Posted by: Mrs. Tim McGraw | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
So is Obama selfish? He isnt helping his aunt that is living in a Boston slum.
Now to me that is selfish he is going around the country saying we must be fair and spread the wealth while he does NOT spread his own wealth. Nor does Biden
Obama pratice what you preach and tell Obama to do that before you call hard working americans selfish
Posted by: Julie | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Some quote from Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have … The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases
The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.
Heed these words.
Posted by: xmaniac | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
In short, Obama says that those of us who are middle class and far from rich are selfish for not wanting to pay more taxes to support his welfare programs? Maybe liberals forgot, but not one of their welfare programs over the last 45 years has worked, not one. It isn’t just about taxes either. It is about the federal courts. It is about personal responsibility. It is about this country getting out of the “everyone is a victim” mentality. Barrack Obama is a socialist who thinks the federal government has the answer to everything. Conservatives believe people have their own answers if given the chance to figure it out. Add to the fact that Obama embraces terrorists, is a racist (“my grandmother, a typical white person”). Factor in Pelosi with her San Francisco values and Harry Reid with his intolerance and hate. He is a leftist and a socialist. I will give him the fact that he isn’t trying to hide his socialist agenda. It is clear for all to see. Add it all up and you have a perfect storm for the weakening of America.
Posted by: Conservative Jim in California | October 31, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Obama didn’t “demonize” anyone. If you notice carefully, he never does. He doesn’t call names, he just disagrees. In this case, he agrees with Republican Teddy Roosevelt who advocated a progressive income tax system (the rich pay higher percentages) and agrees with the tax rates Reagan approved. He only disagrees with the regressive tax cuts George Bush gave to the wealthiest. Notice that Exxon did just fine last quarter. Did all the Joe the Plumbers have record incomes? Probably not.
It’s OK to believe the rich are more deserving of tax breaks if you want. Maybe they’ll hire more maids and golf instructors. Also fine to think extending unemployment benefits is a smarter and faster way to get cash into the system as many liberals do.
But it’s not accurate to say Obama has “demonized” anyone. He just doesn’t. That’s why so many people like him.
Posted by: Kenn | October 31, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
I’ve seen a lot of idiot chat boards in my day, but this is high on the list.
A) If Obama is socialist, then America is a socialist country.
B) McCain/Palin know nothing about domestic/foreign policy, respectively, and there is no denying that.
C) If you pay taxes and support the military, you are, by the right’s definition, a socialist.
D) Socialism means state control of the means of production, which no one has ever advocated, except socialists.
Do your homework or stay out of the conversation and stay out of the way as Democrats run the country correctly.
Posted by: Keith Johnsen | October 31, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
I’m not in the top $250K threshold that Obama talked about this summer. I’m not in the $200K threshold of income that he talked about this fall.
I’m not at that threshold of $150K that Joe Biden revealed last week, moments before the campaign shipped him off to a padded room, and I’m not even at the $120K that Gov. Bill Richardson let slip this week.
But I WILL be in the next threshold and so will many, many of us. Are ALL Americans selfish? I suppose that before you know it, anyone with a J-O-B will be considered selfish.
I pray a lot these days. I pray that just enough of us WAKE UP and STOP this man from being the most powerful person on Earth.
I donate to charity. With after-tax dollars, to the organization I choose and whose goals I agree with. The government already has enough of my dollars. I am a widow and I support myself. If Obama takes more of my money, I may just quit my job and let Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party take care of me.
Posted by: Susan | October 31, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I am just shocked reading what has been written. Does no one think about what they say before they write? The mean IQ in this country is 100. This means fifty percent are above 100 and fifty percent are below it. It’s easy to see who falls where on this blog today. You should be ashamed of yourselves. You have made the men running for office into bogeymen. Both Obama and McCain are professional, hardworking, people who believe in their positions. They are not slimy, no good creeps who are interested in harming anyone. Instead of hiding behind your snarky remarks, why don’t you open yourself up to public scrutiny, and run for office in your local community? If you don’t trust what is happening, then organize something in your community and make a difference. There’s a reason that McCain and Obama are war heros and Harvard graduates and you are not. I cannot imagine either of them making the kind of inane comments you are advancing here. Neither of them would want you on their side. I can guarantee you that. Intelligent discourse with verifiable data, fine. Reasonable disagreement without racial slurs (like the term “Whitey”- REALLY…) – that’s the stuff true political discussion is made of. Most of these posts look like they should be written in spray paint on the side of a building someplace.
Posted by: Hazel | October 31, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The tax problem for all of you who don’t think we don’t pay enough is simple.At the first of the year when you go to pay taxs file an 40ez form and don’t claim your mortage interest,or any other deductions and their will be more in the coffers for those you care for. NOBODY is stopping ANY of you.
Posted by: disgruntled | October 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Freddie,
Were you a slave? Were your parents? Grandparents? I highly doubt it since slavery has not been allowed for 150 years. What makes you think YOU should get anything for what happened to previous generations? Do you even know if any of you relatives were slaves? How far back should things go? If you or event your parents were help in captivity as a slave, I could understand, but why should I have to pay or even say “I’m sorry” for things that I had nothing to do with. I am sure that if I go back in my family tree I could find some relative that was done wrong. My heritage is Italian, Irish & German. I am sure that of that group, someone in my family tree was abused or killed. Give it up and get on with your life and stop looking for other people to give you things you should earn.
Posted by: SteveB | October 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
With McCain your federal tax would not be changed but your heath benefits would be taxed now, which boilds down to you will be taxed more under McCain. The health care credit that would be offered is a joke, because I am a single person I would only get $2500. You only get $5000 if you are a family. Finding GOOD health coverage without ahigh deductable or co pay for $2500 is not possible.
Calling Obama a Marxist or Socialist is a little outrageous. Adjusting the tax system that is already in place and going back to Clinton era levels in some cases is far from being a Socialist/Marxist. If he truely was a Marxist, Obama would be saying give me the deed to your home, give me the title to your car, ect.. “Spreading the wealth” by adjusting tax rates in a tax system that is already in place is a far cry from Socialism.
Posted by: Joshua | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Oy, this “socialism” nonsense.
Do any of you hysterics realize that Obama is merely proposing to raise the highest marginal tax rate about 3.5% to the level it was during the Clinton years while giving everyone else a sizable tax cut. I didn’t hear many people complaining about socialism in the go-go nineties. Besides, why is it economic justice when rich people get a gigantic tax cut and socialism when I get a moderate one?
Are you also aware that, for six years of your Saint Ronald Reagan’s presidency the highest marginal tax rate was 50%, and that’s after he cut taxes in ’82. Does that make Reagan, who some of you seem to want to name every overpass, rest stop and urinal in the country after, 11% more socialist than Obama?
Come on. Cut it out. If the progressive income tax is socialist, every president since it was instituted in 1916 has been one, and considerably more so than Obama.
If you’re all flat-taxers, fine. Go ahead and say so, but then McCain’s a socialist, too, and you should be on his a** about it as much as Obama’s. If you’re not against progressive taxation but just think rich people need tax cuts more than middle-class and working poor people, I hope you’ll forgive me if I decide that the sick retiree whose company weaseled into shedding his pension so that he now has to choose between food and medicine or the aide at the nursing home who works a second job and still can’t afford a vacation deserves it more.
Posted by: Matt Weiss | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
All these years that I have worked so hard (sometimes 2 jobs) so I could have just a little bit for retirement was for nothing. If I had known that I was going to have to donate it in the end, I wouldn’t have worked so hard. I guess that makes me selfish. Now, I’m not only a racist but a selfish one because I don’t support Obama.
Posted by: mad | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Keith Johnsen:
Don’t hit and run. Back up your points, my man. You have to prove your point.
We are considered a HYPERcapitalistic country.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
And after the election, whether Obama wins or loses, how are all you liberals going to explain the riots in the major cities? Can’t wait to see the justification for destroying private property just like 1992 Los Angeles.
Posted by: West Coast Conservative | October 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
This means so little coming from a man who has never created a job or did anything in the private sector like trying to survive… He’s had handouts his whole career, and now let’s look at the big picture: Those that want to give others a leg up should start with their own families. For a guy who has his people complain about Sarah Palin’s 100K wardrobe, then spends $4 million on the networks who have carried his water, a guy who’s half brother lives in a hut, and an aunt who lives in a slum, and found time to do all this spending but couldn’t invest in his own family, there is something terribly wrong. I figure that every cake deserves a cherry, and we’ve got a Congress that’s a perfect match for this idiot.
Posted by: Hans in Clayton | October 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Keith Johnsen:
You care to explain why the Communist Party USA endorses Obama and says that after all these years “its time has come”?
And don’t try to split hairs re: “socialism” and “communism” — socialism is like a gateway drug.
I gotta bounce … will be back in a few for your answer.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
OBAMA DOESN’T GET IT.
In the United States, charity is supposed to come through non-profits and NGOs and religious organizations, not through the government coming in and making you fork it over to the people “THEY” think should get it.
If Obama wants to see selfish, look no further than Joe Biden. How is it I gave ten times more money than Joe Biden to charity last year yet live in a neighborhood in Chicago valued at 1/5 of Obama’s?
PAYING YOUR TAXES DOESN’T MAKE YOU GENEROUS – IT JUST MAKES YOU LAW-ABIDING, WHICH SOUNDS STRANGELY, ER….REPUBLICAN.
Posted by: Obie in Chicago | October 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Higher taxes YES!
How else are we gonna pay for this $$Trillion A Month war and the $700k bailout?
Posted by: RubyRed Republican | October 31, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
By trying to force everyone to be virtuous as Barack defines virtuous, he will take away the ability of small-business owners to give the rest of jobs.
Posted by: ForObamaBeforeIWasAgainstHim | October 31, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Hey “mad” – 1982 has nothing to do with it. WE DO NOT WANT TO PAY MORE TAXES. Is it not our right to keep what we have earned and distribute it the way we see fit? Like job creation, charitable donations and good old American capitalism? No, you liberals want the Obamessiah to decide for us. That is just outright Marxism, period. So quit looking down your nose at coservatives like a typical, elitist liberal.
Posted by: California Conservative | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Who would have thought that a man who continues to insult America and American’s is about to be our next President.
Posted by: kim | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
By trying to force everyone to be virtuous as Barack defines virtuous, he will take away the ability of small-business owners to give the rest of us jobs.
Americans had better think twice because of lot of us are going to need jobs and if Barack starts messing with that he will cause a lot of us a lot of pain and I fail to see the virtue in that.
Posted by: ForObamaBeforeIWasAgainstHim | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
I am willing to pay higher taxes to get my country out of the financial mess we are in. That is the least I can do for my country.
COUNTRY 1st — OBAMA!
We have to pay for the two ground wars and the bailout. How else we gonna raise the money. Everybody pay up with a smile. We will be just fine.
Posted by: RubyRed Republican | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
California Conservative…isn’t that an oxymoron??
Posted by: Angela | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
California Conservative…isn’t that an oxymoron??
Posted by: Angela | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Freddie: heres your answer, consider it a friendly warning from the founders. If you dont think it can happen here just keep pushing.
“Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Posted by: Enough is Enough | October 31, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
By trying to force everyone to be virtuous as Barack defines virtuous, he will take away the ability of small-business owners to give the rest of us jobs.
Americans had better think twice because of lot of us are going to need jobs and if Barack starts messing with that he will cause a lot of us a lot of pain and I fail to see the virtue in that.
Posted by: ForObamaBeforeIWasAgainstHim | October 31, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Hey Tapper,
You shouldn’t describe what Ayn Rand writes when you know nothing about it. Your description is absolutely off the mark.
Research a little further than what the academics, the derisive intelligencia, think of her work and you might find a true example to use in your article.
Posted by: merle | October 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
There is only one problem with casting an early vote … your candidate can open his mouth and make you regret your choice.
It is not patriotic to pay more taxes.
It is not selfish to not want to work until August or September until I can keep the money I earn for my family.
It took until Bush’s 2nd term for me to regret voting for him. It isn’t even election day and I wish I could take back my early ballot for Obama
Posted by: Eric R | October 31, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Has “that one” paid for anything his life?
Posted by: MeatHead | October 31, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
This is for Fred, or who ever said this
“Any people that got rich who didn’t do it on the backs of poor people please stand up. No one? No surprise.”
I hope you are talking about Barack Obama when you say this?
He is certainly “rich” correct?
I think he actually got there through hard work (self serving work mostly but thats fine) How did he do that, something he says you cant do unless you are already “rich and powerful”?
Do we need Obama to make America great or did America make Obama great? The answer is crystal clear.
Guess what Fred? I also “made it” and am now one of the selfish, unpatriotic, evil “wealthy” according to BO. And guess how that happened? I spent 6 years on a submarine, while you were screwing off apparently. Then I worked 80 hours a week for 10 year. Then I saved my money and invested it while you were buying lottery tickets, beer or ciagretes maybe?
So, I walked down my driveway at 17 years of age with exactly $20 in my pocket, you could have been right next to me where were you? You are the load on the poor and “rich” I am paying my share already and giving plenty (more than hypocrite Biden) to WORTHY causes, not Nancy pelosi handing out cash money to junkies as well as the needy! Get clue Fred.
Posted by: ssbn617 | October 31, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Last I checked, this has been done before to no avail! Everyone should take responsibility for their own lives, we are not trying to keep poor people poor, but there is a lot of opportunity out there, one has to make their way! We are taught to not give our kids everything, to let them “earn” their way, and that is what all of us need to do in America! Secondly, we are not to work for the government, it is supposed to work for us! How dare someone in the Government tell me what I am supposed to do with my hard earned money! So, if everyone else is a victim, then it is time for those who work hard to become the “new” victim? I don’t think so! We are all unique, and we all need to earn our way!!! This is the American way, and the American dream! Thank you!
Posted by: Englishgal | October 31, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Last I checked, this has been done before to no avail! Everyone should take responsibility for their own lives, we are not trying to keep poor people poor, but there is a lot of opportunity out there, one has to make their way! We are taught to not give our kids everything, to let them “earn” their way, and that is what all of us need to do in America! Secondly, we are not to work for the government, it is supposed to work for us! How dare someone in the Government tell me what I am supposed to do with my hard earned money! So, if everyone else is a victim, then it is time for those who work hard to become the “new” victim? I don’t think so! We are all unique, and we all need to earn our way!!! This is the American way, and the American dream! Thank you!
Posted by: Englishgal | October 31, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Why is Laurel getting credit for my thoughts…I posted the history lesson
Posted by: Mrs. Tim McGraw | October 31, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Here is the solution:
The Higher Optional Tax (H. O. T.) where taxpayers voluntarily have more taxes taken out of their paychecks (whatever amount they want). Make it so that the extra money generated from the H.O.T. goes 100% into federal social programs. Now here is the great part about this H.O.T.: Liberals love taxes and liberals love taking care of others. With all of the rich and well off liberals in this country, the amount of money given by them would be staggering. Many of the social ills in this country could be eliminated or greatly reduced.
3 states already have a H.O.T. so it certainly could be done on a national level. The only thing holding it back is the fear of hypocrisy.
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I hope all of you repubs are packed up to leave. Well, come Wednesday morning Sen. Obama may be president elect. I recall the conservative battle cry: “USA love it or leave it”. It sounds like you may not love America anymore. See ya!
Posted by: GPaul | October 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Just give all yer money to the gubmint. They will be there to take care of you just like they did during Katrina.
Posted by: DC | October 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
If I took money from as rich dude it would be stealing and I would goi to jail. But somehow if the governmant does it on my behalf it is “fair”????
Posted by: aregulardude | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Obama has said that “rich” means $250K and up.
He has also said that “rich” means $200K.
Biden recently said the middle class is anyone under $150K, implying of course that anything above $150K is “rich”.
The scale keeps sliding. Before long, rich will mean anyone with a job. Anyone who believes that Obama will not raise taxes on all of us is either naive or stupid.
Then again Obama’s base pays no taxes, so they have nothing to worry about.
Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Here’s a novel idea. Get a Job and advance through the system unless you consider yourself inferior to those that do not have their hand out for “free stuff”. Obama is a disgrace to our way of life and the American People are falling for this Con Man. If what Americans want is a Black President they have sure missed the boat. I have been a supporter of and campaigned for the most qualified man for President over the past four elections. He just happens to be a “Real Black Man” and not a “want a be”. Maybe thats why when you ask the average black person or white person who “Alan Keys” is they have no idea? Maybe he’s just to black, to honest, to conservative, to Godly and to intelligent. Oh yea he expects every capable human being to contribute to the workforce by keepinga job and actually working when they go to the job. I guess that last requirement is just to much for America.
Posted by: dennis roberson | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Sorry Mrs. Tim McGraw, when I looked back to see who wrote the Cuba analogy, it now has your name on it. I swear it said Laurel the first time I looked at it. I think something is funny with this blog. Your post was very good, so I will give credit where credit is due this time and post it again!
History Lesson: In the late 1950′s most Cubans thought Cuba needed a “Change”, and they were right. So when a young, dynamic leader came along, every Cuban was at least receptive. When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press fell in love with him. They never questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in. He said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, and everyone followed. He said he would bring justice and equality to all, and everyone said “Praise the Lord!” The young leader said “I will be for change, and I’ll bring you change,” and everyone yelled “Viva Fidel!” But by the time the executioner’s guns went silent, the people’s guns had been taken away. By they time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were working for him. By the time the change was implemented Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third World status. By the time the change was over more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes. Luckily, we in America would never fall for a young leader who promised change without asking “what change?’ Would we?
Posted by: DC | October 31, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I think most of you are insane for believing nobama will win….
The polls you are all looking at are all fixed!!!! Anytime you use 800 dems and 600 reps…unbalanced…to create a poll…then you will obviously have tilted numbers..
If any of you cant understand that, then go back to school!!!!!
Posted by: timtan | October 31, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
thanks DC!! too bad more people don’t see it that way
Posted by: Mrs. Tim McGraw | October 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
This election will place in the White House one of two men who are far too generous with money they didn’t earn.
In BOTH cases, people far richer than any threshold income being discussed were bailed out to the tune of a TRILLION dollars. Platinum diamond encrusted parachutes will be delivered to executives who have wrecked the world economy without prosecution or recourse.
The demon portrayed by Obama is “unpatriotic” or “selfish” for not rolling over for a tax hike.
I make more than 250K. I also own my own company and work 90 hours a week vice 40. That’s why its MY money.
There will be revolution in this nation. Just like the last one. And taxation will be the issue.
Elect Senators and Congressmen who have balanced a checkbook. Debtors should not be allowed. Look what Debtocracy has earned us.
Posted by: Conan The Libertarian | October 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
If governments,(local,state and federal) didn’t confiscate about 60/70% of what people make, think of how much better they would be living. If they were spending that money on products instead of feeding a bureaucracy, we could have “0″ unemployment, of course we would have to force the three or four % who have no intention of EVER working. And this DIMWIT thinks you aren’t paying enough taxes. You ZERO’S that vote for this loser, it will be the worst day of your life.
Posted by: wildbill69 | October 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Here we go with the fear and hate, I am black and those that say that all or some or lazy you need to live on my block. I stated working when I was 16, I had a baby when I was 20 yes no husband, as the lady said something about gub-ment cheese, I could not get that because there was so many poor whites in line by the time it came to this little blck girl there was no more that’s when I decide that I could do better. I went back to scool and yes the whites try to stop me there as well, I wanted to be a nurse but the guy who was over placement told me why not be a cook. for 2 month I worked my butt of to get into that nursing class quess what people this guy was fired because he supressed so many black adult because we tried to better ourselves. I found out that I had passed the test to get into nursing school 3 times but this white guy kept telling me I fell. I’ve been now 55 year some would say that’s nott a long time. But have you been where I been in 55 years?
Posted by: Joanne | October 31, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
McCain will win.
The brain washed Obamanatinalist will have to cry to mama
Last night I went out to dinner, saw a bum sitting in front of the restraunt holding an Obama sign. Underneth it read vote for Obama so I can eat. I went inside and in the lobby was an Obama sign. Thinking nothing of it, I ordered my food. As I was enjoing my dinner it hit me. I paid for my bill and received change from the waiter. I ask the waiter if he was for Obama and he answered yes. I said oh good, then you won’t mind if I redistribute your tip to the bum outside so he can eat. Have a great evening.
Posted by: BirdGirl | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Ridiculous.
Obama didn’t say that opposing higher taxes is selfish. You said that and tried to make it look like it was him.
Posted by: Lucas Gonze | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
First I’ll move my money off shore. Then I’ll move my business off shore Then I’ll move myself off shore. Have a nice day.
Posted by: weirdone | October 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
But Obama isn’t being “Selfless.” Selflessness would spending his own money, which he isn’t. His brother lives in a hut in Africa on $5/year and his Aunt lives in a Boston Slum.
He wants to spend our money that we worked hard for and give it to people who didn’t. That’s not selflessness, it’s complete socialism.
Selfishness isn’t wanting to keep your own money. It’s wanting someone else’s.
Posted by: Real American | October 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
So Obama wants to talk about selfishness?
How about the guy who made millions on his books, but only gave a pittance to charity until recently, when advised it didn’t look too good…
Or the guy who allows his closest relatives to languish in abject poverty…
Obama thinks that somehow it is a virtue to give away other people’s money. Maybe he thinks that he is a modern-day Robin Hood. But Robin Hood’s battle was against the unjust taxation of a tyrannical government.
Posted by: LMAN | October 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
YOU KNOW MEATHEAD IS RIGHT
Posted by: BirdGirl | October 31, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“The way we are going to create wealth in this country in the same way we have always created wealth – from the bottom up.” -B.O.
Examples please. By that rationale Venezuela should be the wealthiest country on the planet. Basic economics eludes this guy and he could quite possibly be the next president. Amazing.
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money. – Alexis de Tocqueville
Posted by: Phil McKraken | October 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
How is it selfish to want to keep money away from an entity that spends it like a drunken sailor? More than one study has found that people on the right side of the political spectrum give far more to charity than their counterparts on the left.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Share my wealth, YEAH RIGHT!
And by the way who paid for their education.?????? We are not allowed to know. How is that for transparency????
Posted by: natalie | October 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
THIS GUY IS JUST DETESTABLE
WHILE THE MCCAIN CAMPAIGN WELCOMES THE MAN OF THE STREET TO JOIN HIM
OBAMA IS NOT PROMOTING A RAFFLE!
PAY TO SEE ME IN PERSON.
PATHETIC GREEDDDDDDDDD
Posted by: w | October 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Yes, let’s SEE OBAMA’s selfLESSNESS—-he has historically had PITIFUL charitable contributions!! WAKE UP, FOLKS! He DOES NOT walk his talk!!! Oh, yeah, he did start donating more (up to 4-6%) in the run up to starting his campaign. What a joke! ARE PEOPLE so GULLIBLE to believe his EXCUSES one after another?? WAKE UP—with 3 of the MOST liberal leaders around—America is going to be hurting!
Posted by: CC | October 31, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
AMEN Jerry Blatnik….God love ya for your hard work!!! I for one think you should get to keep every dime you make….my only hope is that you live in a state with no state income tax so you can keep even more of what’s YOURS!!!
Posted by: Kelly | October 31, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
What Sen. Obama fails to point out that with high income tax, property tax and sales tax, people won’t be able to buy that car, that computer, etc. Also we want to go back to the 90′s? I thought this thing was about change? new, etc. Now we are going back. The only thing that is changing is Sen. Obama.
Posted by: Jose | October 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
What a hypocrite! What a lying, Marxist hypocrite. He goes on about wealthy people (and hints at conservative people) being selfish. Well, I’m right in the middle of the middle-class bracket and I annually give 12 to 13% of my money to charity. I do it becuase I want to. What I do not want are liberals like him (who are cheap and selfish when it comes to their own money) and big government forcing me to give my money with oppressive taxes.
Posted by: William F. Butler | October 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
OK to all you selfish crybabies who don’t want to pay taxes. DON’T. We should institute a new tax code with a zero tax, called the selfish tax, or ME, MYSELF and I. Here is how I’d recommend these no-tax citizens would be handled.
1. Teach your kids yourself, or hire a teacher.
2. Get your own security agency to protect you. If you call the police, they’d hang up on you, since you aren’t paying for their service.
3. Special glasses would be required by all taxpayers when they drive. That way, they’d be able to see street and traffic signs. All you tax cry babies would need to figure out your own way of identifying signage since these signs wouldnt be visible to you.
4. Food products would be sold to you as is. There would be no inspections as to where is came from — buyer beware.
5. If you need to get to the hospital, hire an ambulance. If none are available, remember it’s free market right?
6. Mail would not be delivered to your house. You would need to pick it up at the Post Office, for a fee of course.
7. Junk mailers could target you, with a flood of mail. If you want them to stop, you’d need to write each one individiually.
8. If you travel on an airplane, you’d need to fly on special aircraft that would have minimal inspections, well below the average.
9. Each highway would have 2 lanes in each direction. The non-taxers would drive in a special lane that will never have any repairs. It is affectionatly called pothole road. If you want to fix it, buy your own asphalt and get out a shovel.
10. Water would not be filtered. Drink or boil at your own risk.
Posted by: Raul the Puppett | October 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
You really believe a 3% tax increas ONLY for those making 250,000+ is socialism?
What in the hell is WRONG with you easily scared simpletons?
Add onto the fact you’re only taxed on the 50,000 OVER 250,000…meaning if you make 300,000 you’d pay an extra 1,500 a year.
Yeah. “Socialism”. Right.
Tuesday can’t come fast enough, death to ignorance.
Posted by: RyanD. | October 31, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
blah :( … this all makes me tired… you all make me tired… we are all going to go back and forth hating each other until the end of time, never meeting in the middle… i’m just going to throw my hands up…
Posted by: tired | October 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
blah :( … this all makes me tired… you all make me tired… we are all going to go back and forth hating each other until the end of time, never meeting in the middle… i’m just going to throw my hands up…
Posted by: tired | October 31, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
OMG, how selfish you people are, It is our duty to sweat and break our backs a little more for those less fortunate. How can anyone be so selfish. We the workers, should help those less fortunate lazy people who are lazy, and using drugs and all kinds of technology like games, that they sit and play games all night, poor things they are too tired to go work. And then there are those that cannot afford to buy snacks. But can mama, do her nails, and keep them up pretty. Now I am not talking about those that can’t help it like not able to find a job, get sick or loose a limb, yet before those bad incidents, they were good hard workers. but then there are those that are addicted to handouts.
Posted by: OMGptl | October 31, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Obama and Biden. What do they have in common? Neither of them have ever held a job in any business or concern that had to make its own way. They have no conception of what it takes for businesses to grow or survive. They think jobs are something the government can “create”.
Bottom line – they don’t believe it’s your money. They believe it belongs to Uncle Sam, and they are being noble to let you keep so much of it.
Posted by: GetReal | October 31, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Since when is the middle class not considered as “working”?
Posted by: RJ Starrs | October 31, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Here is the problem for those people who think they are so intelligent (thought not “wealthy” I guess)
I pay crap loads of Income tax and I am willing to pay it to pay for the government. Now we have half the people paying for the other half who pay nothing… Thats Shaky enough, but okay.
Now we have some of those who dont pay calling those that do pay “selfish”
Even more shaky..
But, where the socialism comes it
Making Work Pay Credit” equal to 6.2 percent of a worker’s first $8,100 in wages. That would yield a tax credit of $500 for a single person, and $1,000 for a couple in which both adults work. As a result, a low-income couple now paying no income taxes might receive a $1,000 refund.
Now you are going to take my money and give it, not to the government, no, but carte blanche to someone who pays NOTHING in income tax. That is socialism
Thats is un American, that is what is making those work and who love America ill.
Could it happen in America? Consider the words of longtime Socialist Party of America presidential candidate Norman Thomas: “The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.”
Posted by: ssbn617 | October 31, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
OH NO! IF I MAKE $300,000 PER YEAR I’LL HAVE TO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $1500 ON THE $50,000 OVER $250,000!
THE SAME TAX RATE AS CLINTON!
IT’LL KEEP ME FROM HIRING PEOPLE, SINCE I CAN HIRE ADDITIONAL HELP FOR $1500 PER YEAR SALARY.
OH NO! SOCIALISM!
Posted by: RyanD. | October 31, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I also think Mr. NO EXPERIENCE should “spread the wealth around” and transfer his campaign funds to McCain so it would be “fair”. If he doesn’t want to do this I think he is “selfish”.
I’m not sure I’ve seen a bigger hypocrite.
He has not EARNED his way to the White House yet could be getting it over someone with experience that has dedicated his entire adult life to serving his country – the USA. That’s fair?
I can understand the people that don’t want to work hard voting for him but why do so many hard working Americans support this fraud? I live near Chicago..prob. the most politically corrupt place in the US..not to mention skyhigh tax rates and rampant crime. Once I started paying closer attention to the election he lost me.
PS DO NOT call me a racist because I am voting to keep the American dream alive. Besides, I would never vote for ANYONE that started their political career in Chicago.
Posted by: indiana | October 31, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Obama IS NOT GOING TO CUT TAXES FOR ANYBODY! He will do exactly what Clinton did when the promised cuts” were due. He said ” I have worked harder on this than anything I have ever worked on, and we just can’t cut your taxes, we will have to raise them.” Not to mention if Obama get’s elected..bye bye Bush tax cuts. I don’t know about you, but I made 55k and was tax rtebated $1,200.00 from Bush’s so called “tax cut’s for the rich”. Obama cutting taxes..IT AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN FOR ANYBODY!!!
Posted by: Norino's | October 31, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Obama IS NOT GOING TO CUT TAXES FOR ANYBODY! He will do exactly what Clinton did when the promised cuts” were due. He said ” I have worked harder on this than anything I have ever worked on, and we just can’t cut your taxes, we will have to raise them.” Not to mention if Obama get’s elected..bye bye Bush tax cuts. I don’t know about you, but I made 55k and was tax rtebated $1,200.00 from Bush’s so called “tax cut’s for the rich”. Obama cutting taxes..IT AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN FOR ANYBODY!!!
Posted by: Norino's | October 31, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
FIRST IF WAS 250K
THEN IT WAS 200K
OBIDEN, before being locked up, SAID IT WAS 150K
THE FAT GUY FROM NEW MEXICO THAT IS STUMPING FOR OBAMA (replacement for Obiden)
said it is 120k today!
IF YOU THINK THAT HE WILL NOT RAISE TAXES FOR YOU AND EVERYONE YOU ARE SMOKING SOMETHING
Posted by: WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE | October 31, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
My selfishness is a virtue, it propels me to do great things so people will pay me for them, and then I in turn can pay others for the great things they do for me.
The selfishness of the Obama voter however is the opposite, they want to steal my achievement through force of law (and the police and military that come with it) for their own use.
Punishing success simply assures everyone will fail, if we all get the same result whether we work for it or not, why should any of us work at all?
Obama, and the libs are just as if not more selfish than any member of the GOP, and Obama is the worst of the lot, he is willing to destroy this nation so he can be a god.
Posted by: cudmaster | October 31, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
AMEN 617
Posted by: BirdGirl | October 31, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
“Any people that got rich who didn’t do it on the backs of poor people please stand up. No one? No surprise.”
That is the most childish thing I’ve ever heard. And it’s nonsense. Bill Gates had a great idea: he put computers in a lot of homes so people can do what we’re doing now. Ten thousand people became millionaires – because they thought he had a great idea. And they were right. What poor people were hurt by this? On the contrary, the poor had thousands of jobs in this new industry.
By the time a child is 7 years old sHe should be able to understand that the money they give for candy is not their money: they choose: the money or the candy. They are not being ripped off. It’s an exchange! It’s a contract!
It is extraordinary that a man who expresses ideas that represent a regression to prepubescence is, quite possibly, going to be the next president of the United States!
Posted by: pxfagonard | October 31, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Are you sure, it is $250K? Just the other day Biden said, it is $150K — and the pair aren’t even elected yet.
How long, ’till it comes down to $50K?
Posted by: Mikhail | October 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Joanne,
My point is this- as a white person whose family had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SLAVE TRADE (nevermind not being rich enough to ever be able to afford hired help), I resent being held responsible by a certain segment of the blacks in this country for sins that were committed in the past. Especially when these folks were NEVER victims of slavery themselves.
For the record, I fully supported the reparations that were paid to the Japanese-Americans; our fellow citizens who were illegally interred during WW2.
The key difference- the folks who got paid ACTUALLY lived through this period in our history.
For those honest, hardworking black folks I offended by lumping them in, I apologize. I should not have painted with such a broad brush. But for the likes of those others who are looking to “punish whitey” to get their money instead of getting real jobs to support themselves, they can take a flying leap. I will NOT apologize to them.
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I work for the government. Your taxes are not at work…your tax dollars are being constantly wasted by government programs.
Obama has lost his mind. We don’t need more government. His mentality actually is socialist.
He wants to raise taxes on investors…the capital gains tax. He wants to bring back taxes on family estates. He wants to raise taxes on many many people, when the economy is fragile.
He doesn’t know economics.
Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Money, business and Taxes.
To the USSR that shut down during Regan:
Hows that socialism thing workin’ out for ya?
Oh, sorry… “redistrubution of wealth”.
To the rest of America:
Well, here is a very true first person scenario. I am 60 yrs old and have owned my business for 24 years and I currently have seven (7) employees that my business provides a decent living for. The longest tenured employee has been with me for 17 yrs.
I’m not going to get into the $250,000 argument, I simply do not trust Obama and the Democrats. I personally think that everyone that pays taxes will get an increase in taxes once they let the Bush tax cuts expire. However I am going to close my business, lay off my employees and sell my equipment and buildings before January 20th, IF Obama is elected.
I had planned on working two more years and trying to line up financing so my employees could buy me out and then I would stay on one more year (as an employee) and help them transition. Now it is not a big operation and I would sell it to them just south of 1 million, which would be at a discount (actual asset value).
Obama’s stated intent is to raise the capital gains tax to 20% (from 15%). That is what he has said he would do….that doesn’t include the possibility of what he might do. Now you might not think that the extra 5% is much of nothing, but I have real property (commercial) that has increased significantly over the last 20 years and that extra 5% is going to cost me a pretty penny.
So, Senator Obama’s election is definitely going to put seven (7) employees out of work and impact my current vendors to the tune of about a half a million per year, one small supplier rather dramatically.
That is how taxes impact small businesses. Small businesses, by nature, want to grow….as they grow, they add staff, they buy more inventory, they invest more in plant and equipment and thus they end up paying more (dollar wise) in total taxes.
When they are constricted by onerous tax rates, they have no choice but to curtail operations, lay off employees, shrink their business…or like I am going to do, just get out entirely and let someone else deal with the “new” economy.
IF, and it still is “IF”, Senator Obama is elected, the tax revenue for “spreading the wealth” won’t come from me, so you guys will have to pick up my part, and the part of every other small business owner who sees this as I do and is able to bail out.
The tipping point is 49% paying and 51% taking. Wonder how close we’ll be in two years of a President Obama’s term.
Posted by: Sam | October 31, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
President John McCain … right for America!!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | October 31, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Ryan D,
First off it would be an additional $2300, not an additional $1500.
And yes you are right, I couldn’t hire someone for $2300 a year. But guess what, when it comes time for me to give you a raise, I’ll give you a raise less the $2300 I will have to pay to Obama. Or instead of giving you an extra $2300 worth of health insurance, I’ll send it to Obama.
Or if I don’t have employees instead of spending that extra $2300 I will send it to Obama. And that $2300 won’t be spent at a restaurant or at a furniture store or on a vacation. And guess what? The restaurant or furniture store or hotel will need one less employee (or fraction of employee via reduced hours) because it won’t have me as a customer.
In the 90s the Democrats decided to put a tax on yachths. Since you know, only the rich buy yachths and they could afford it. Except guess what happened? Rich people stopped buying yachths and within 2 years 7600 jobs in the yacht business were lost. It was so severe that the tax was repealed.
You’d think libs would have learned a lesson from that. Sadly of course they didn’t.
Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Raul the Puppet…you really are Obama’s puppet aren’t you? Your arguement might hold water if Obama were planning on giving more money to the USDA inspectors, the Dept. of Transportation, FAA inspectors, the US Postal service, etc…however, he want’s to tax the “rich” as you liberals are so fond of calling the hard working Americans and give a hand out to the “poor”. Why doesn’t he take some of that 7 million plus he spent on his infomercial and go hand it out to the poor in the inner cities???
Posted by: Veronica | October 31, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
DWIK Has hit the nail on the head … $250,000 / year with no support, trust funds etc is NOT wealthly- especially in the Northeast and California (inclly Obama strongholds). The Insurance Cos now define wealthy as an individual net worth of $5M.. Salary independant. The proposed tax increases will have Littlle effect on the Pelosi/Kennedy/Bush and yes obama/Clinton rich.. it will however really hurt the middle class, with the worst effects to the Upper Middle Class..
Posted by: mook | October 31, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I wisely invested over my working years and retired in 2001. I’m 67 years old and am living off of my investments. I am not by any definition “rich” and in recent months have lost 35 % of my retirement income. I don’t consider it selfish to oppose further erosion of my retirement security by having to pay higher taxes on dividends and capital gains!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: twit | October 31, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Obama’s concept of “selfishness” among higher, hard working achievers exhibits a basic lack of understanding of what this country is all about.
I started with nothing – worked many long hours at dirty jobs for a decade before launching my own business – which also has taken many years of long hours and very hard work.
Today I employee many, donate sizeable sums to charity, and provide a nice tax base. I stll work hard – but if Obama takes more money from me, guess what? I’ll have to fire people and cut back on my charitible contributions. How dare Obama want to punish success and destroy the American dream?
I spend five months a year in Europe in countries that are socialist democracies. Medical care is free but very poor quality. Wages are low, unemployment high. Most Europeans don’t like George Bush. But guess what? Every last one of them would love to escape their mediocre existence and come to the United States to pursue the Ammerican Dream. We are the last chance, but Obama is dead set in favor of social engineering this dream out of existence.
So the “selfishness” remark pretty well sums it up – a sophmoric statement – not to mention an insulting one at that. I think it will cost him the election.
Posted by: Ralph Lewis | October 31, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Obama’s concept of “selfishness” among higher, hard working achievers exhibits a basic lack of understanding of what this country is all about.
I started with nothing – worked many long hours at dirty jobs for a decade before launching my own business – which also has taken many years of long hours and very hard work.
Today I employee many, donate sizeable sums to charity, and provide a nice tax base. I stll work hard – but if Obama takes more money from me, guess what? I’ll have to fire people and cut back on my charitible contributions. How dare Obama want to punish success and destroy the American dream?
I spend five months a year in Europe in countries that are socialist democracies. Medical care is free but very poor quality. Wages are low, unemployment high. Most Europeans don’t like George Bush. But guess what? Every last one of them would love to escape their mediocre existence and come to the United States to pursue the Ammerican Dream. We are the last chance, but Obama is dead set in favor of social engineering this dream out of existence.
So the “selfishness” remark pretty well sums it up – a sophmoric statement – not to mention an insulting one at that. I think it will cost him the election.
Posted by: Ralph Lewis | October 31, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I work as a consultant to manufacturers that wish to take advantage of Mexico’s maquiladora industry to cut their costs. Ever since Obama has been talking about raising business taxes and making it easier to unionize my phone has been ringing consistently. Vote for Obama, and watch out for your jobs.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
obama should look in the mirror- he’s rich and doesn’t even help his own family- and barely gives a dime to any charity- he should put his OWN money where his big, fat, mouth is!
Posted by: sharon | October 31, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
I actually look forward to having a little more $$ in my pocket. It seems since the Busch tax cuts my property taxes have almost doubled and sale tax increased 2% here in KS. Could this have something to do with less federal support to States,County and local for projects???
The 90′s weren’t that bad financially.
Posted by: Boburuncle | October 31, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
come on citizens. please think clearly. he said he’s not talking about charity. he’s not talking about paying off the national debt. he’s talking about redistribution of wealth. taking our money and giving to the people he chooses. if anyone wants to go to college today it is possible, i know it is. is it hard? yes it is. there are already job training programs. there are health insurance co-ops, of course you can’t have any harmful health habits. is life hard? yes, it is hard for 90% of us. if we let government take over our lives there may be no way back to freedom. yes, our country is tilting to socialism (bailouts, etc.) this could be the fall of our great nation. please think this through, please, lets take back our government.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
we worked hard all of our lives
put two children through college
paid off our home
ready to enjoy our time together
have 1 mother in nursing home
another on the way
take care of our family responsiblities
and are now faced with IRS bills
OBAMA IS FILTHY RICH AND LETS HIS FAMILY LIVE IN SLUMS
AND HE HAS THE GALL TO TELL ME I AM SELFISH?
Posted by: I SMELL AN OPPORTUNIST | October 31, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
BEWARE: LIBERAL FASCISM IS AT THE DOOR
Posted by: seeknow | October 31, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I am a single parent and got a whole 34.44 from the stimulus package. My brother who is married with no kids got 1200. How is that fair. Two families with two people and the one with two workers gets a bigger rebate. Just doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Please don’t give me another stimulus package.
Posted by: SingleParent | October 31, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
spread the wealth is obamas cry he has 600 million dollars to work with in his political account that is a little over 2 million dollars per american so obama spread the wealth it would insure the presidency and end poverty at the same time
Posted by: gary d stevens | October 31, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Obama’s plan is the definition of Socialism. It’s been tried many times and consistently failed. The results are slums. There’s nothing selfish about not wanting our country to join those slums. If you prefer his economic approach, leave this capitalist (and I mean that in a good way) country!
Posted by: ron | October 31, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
John:
He said NOTHING AT ALL about paying off the national debt. When Charles Gibson asked him if he realized that each time the capital gains tax was raised the treasury actually collected more money, he said, “it’s an issue” of fairness.
IT’S ALL ABOUT ROBIN HOOD ECONOMICS
READ THE FATHER OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZING IN “RULES FOR RADICALS”. A BOOK WITH THE PURPOSE OF INSTRUCTING HOW THE “HAVE NOTS” ARE TO TAKE FROM THE “HAVES”. What ever happened to our system to give the “have nots” the tools to become “haves”? I am a beneficiary of this.
I find what page 103 of the book has to say in the context of the last two years:
“The organizer’s job is to inseminate an invitation for himself, to agitate, introduce ideas, get people pregnant with hope and a desire for change and to indentify you as the person most qualified for this purpose”
READ “RULES FOR RADICALS” IF YOU WANT TO GET INTO “THE ONE’S” BRAIN.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
No, “Liberal-Intellectual” is a oxymoron
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
A Socialist by any other name is still a Socialist, and that is what BO is. In this country, anyone can pull themselves up from whatever circumstances they were born into. They can and do educate themselves and make a better life for themselves. This garbage BO is spewing about how income redistribution is the right thing to do is pablum for the masses of people who won’t get off their lazy butts and go educate themselves or go to work. Personally I do not want to be told who or what I should give my hard earned money to. I willingly and joyfully give over 10% of my income away each year. But I am not interested in supporting ANYONE who is not willing to support themselves. The LORD loves a cheerful giver and the LORD helps those who help themselves.
MCCAIN/PALIN 2008
Posted by: veritaseequitas | October 31, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Which is more selfish?
1. Me–to want to keep what I have earned and give to charity as I see fit?
2. Others–who didn’t earn my money, didn’t sacrifice for it, but wants a cut?
3. Obama–who wants to use my money to give to others so they will vote him in?
Posted by: Gabrielle | October 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
I just saw an Obama comercial where he said that he wants us to focus on our “Common Purpose”. Great idea. The govt can assign some of us to be farmers, others to be doctors etc. Some of us can work the bread lines. Hopefully, since I’m a selfish capatilist, I can have the job of telling the people at the end of the bread line that we are out of bread, but if they show up early tomorrow, we might have more. The eliets like Obama can run the central government (Party Officials) and take care of the rest of us. We already have the press set up to limit what information is released to the public. This will be great! by the way, for you Obama supporters who agree with me, I am being sarcastic.
Posted by: JDK | October 31, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Steve: I know exactly who Obama is he has told me with his own words
“To avoid being mistaken for a sell out, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students, The foreign students, The Chicanos, The Marxist Professors and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.” Barak Obama from “Dreams of My Father.
I have read both of Obama’s books and have been looking into his background for many months; long before he became so controversial after the Wright revelations. What I discovered is:
His father, the focus of his book, was a card carrying member of the Communist Party in Kenya. His mentor growing up was Frank Marshall Davis, the poet he mentions above, a Communist Party member, his mentor in collage, Saul Alinski, a Marxist. His pastor the reverend Wright also a Marxist as are his friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn Ayers and Mike Kolnsky, all Marxists. An early “Official Blogger” on his own web site, Sam Graham Felsen a Marxist. He has been endorsed by Carl Davison a Marxist who serves as a national steering committee member of United for Peace and Justice a Marxist organization.The Communist Party USA endorses Obama and says that after all these years “its time has come”? He supports, and has campaigned for Kenya’s Raila Odinga, his cousin, a Marxist terrorist. He trained organizers for and served as a lawyer for, ACORN, a Marxist organization. He advocates redistribution the wealth an idea right out of Karl Marx’s writings: In order for a government to redistribute wealth they must first confiscate it from those who have produced it as government only consumes wealth they do not produce it. Guilt by association; or birds of a feather perhaps?
Posted by: Old retired guy | October 31, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
51 and white.when i entered the job market afirmitive action just kicked in.i was told repeatedly “we cant hire a white man for 2 and a half years”.i was angry for awhile,ranting,” the people who make these laws are exempted from them”.well, not anymore clem!!welcome to the afirmative action presidency LOL LOL LOL
Posted by: andy | October 31, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Who’s selfish? JOE BIDEN! He gave a measley .03% to charity, that’s $369 on a salary of well over $300,000 last year. How DARE BO try to tell the american people who word freaking hard for their money that it is selfish to want to hold onto as much as possible when HIS OWN RUNNING MATE might as well give nothing. RIDICULOUS! I can’t wait for this election to be over and MCP to win so I can stop reading this man’s pathetic socialist ideals!
GOP: It’s not too late! We can still win this even without the $200,000,000 BO has to spend this month. All we have to do is GO VOTE!! NO EXCUSES, GO VOTE!!!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
For the geniuses that keep using the
term socialism: even if you really knew
what defines true socialism I wonder
what percentage of you even know what the three branches of government are.
Secondly, if you know what laissz – faire capitalism is, then tell me if the 1930s and the present day give evidence that the system fixes itself. The McCain campaign panders to the politically ignorant. Maybe after all there are reasons why professionals should know something more than just their professions, such as a bit of history, economics, and political science. As teachers are accustomed to
saying, there IS a price for ignorance.
Posted by: Harv | October 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
In response to RyanD, the issue is not paying taxes. The top 5% already pay the majority of federal income taxes, and the bottom 50% pay nothing. The issue is paying more taxes and giving money directly to people who already are not paying income taxes. Also, note the following.
>1. Teach your kids yourself, or hire a teacher.
We (my wife)actually do this, but even if the local public schools are funded by property taxes – paid on the state/county level.
>2. Get your own security agency to protect you. If you call the police, they’d hang up on you, since you aren’t paying for their service.
Again, this is a county/city/state function, funded by state or local taxes – sales, income.
>3. Special glasses would be required by all taxpayers when they drive. That way, they’d be able to see street and traffic signs. All you tax cry babies would need to figure out your own way of identifying signage since these signs wouldnt be visible to you.
Once again, this is a state function, funded by state level taxes – paid in addition to federal taxes.
>4. Food products would be sold to you as is. There would be no inspections as to where is came from — buyer beware.
True, the FDA oversees this – what happened before the FDA – I’m surprised anyone survived to tell about this!
>5. If you need to get to the hospital, hire an ambulance. If none are available, remember it’s free market right?
This is not usually government provided. If it is, it is local government such as city. Where I live, a private company provides this service through 911. You better believe a bill is sent for this service.
>6. Mail would not be delivered to your house. You would need to pick it up at the Post Office, for a fee of course.
FedEx, UPS – heard of these guys? Besides the post office is funded by selling stamps etc. Ever try to mail a letter without postage?
>7. Junk mailers could target you, with a flood of mail. If you want them to stop, you’d need to write each one individiually.
You have got to be kidding about this one.
>8. If you travel on an airplane, you’d need to fly on special aircraft that would have minimal inspections, well below the average.
Again, the FAA does oversee this but honestly, how many planes can an airline afford to lose? Crashing airplanes has got to be bad for business.
>9. Each highway would have 2 lanes in each direction. The non-taxers would drive in a special lane that will never have any repairs. It is affectionatly called pothole road. If you want to fix it, buy your own asphalt and get out a shovel.
Yes this is actually a legimate function of the federal government to maintain and build highways – it is funded through the gas tax, not income taxes.
>10. Water would not be filtered. Drink or boil at your own risk.
Again, local function if even government provided, but I pay a bill each month to my water utility for drinkable water.
Posted by: TomS | October 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“Obama didn’t “demonize” anyone. If you notice carefully, he never does. He doesn’t call names, he just disagrees.”
Guess you should tell that to all the “bitter Americans clinging to their guns and religion.”
Posted by: Nathan Ralph | October 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
How about instead of complaining all you sickos go out and do something with yourself? It does not matter who is President, in the last 14 elections, there has not been one pre election promise that has ever been kept to its word. FIND ONE AND LET ME KNOW. Stop looking for answers and create them. Happy Halloween….
Posted by: JM | October 31, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Valtonik, I’ve spend enough time in the former Soviet Union to know that our system of economic capitalism was light years ahead of their system of communism. Those that claim they are poor in America live like kings compared how the poor in the former Soviet Union live.
Do NOT compare the two. Our standard of living has been staggeringly high compared to the rest of the world, as well as that other former world super power.
Posted by: Sonya B. | October 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Old retired guy:
Isn’t it a bit contradictory that Obama, in his own book says that he was drawn to Wright’s church because of its stated principals that include “a disavowel of middleclassedness” has been running around declaring that the way to rebuild America is to strengthen the middle class?
Where I am from it’s called making the sale, or a sheep in wolves clothing.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I think it is selfish to take money from citizens’ HARD EARNED pay. Obama seems to think other wise.
I will not vote for Obama.
Posted by: ccollins | October 31, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Quit whining so much about the rate and Obama didn’t say anything about taxing anyone except those that make over 250,000 annually which is 1% of the population excluding everyone on this board because if you were making over 250k then you wouldn’t waste you’re time on this thing. If they do decide to tax me more, so be it as long the government uses the money for public services like access to health care for everyone and affordable education. I am so sick of all the whiners in this country who don’t realize the importance of a government that is not bankrupt and taxes. If you don’t like taxes then don’t call the police next time because that’s socially paid for by everyone, don’t flush the toilet because that is collective paid for, burn your trash because trash collection is socially paid for, and don’t send your kid to public schools or universities because they are also socially paid for.
Shut up and pay up!
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Arrogance.
Posted by: Roger Mashburn | October 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
The 90′s were economically good for a few reasons. The cold war had just ended and we were able to cut a lot out of the defense budget, the Reps controlled congress and thus kept Clinton in check on his spending, the stock market was artificially valued due to crooked accounting and the internet bubble.
Posted by: stan | October 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
BO says:
He is not in favor of reparations, so dont vote 4 him 4 that.
He has no agenda to help cut your state taxes.
He hasn’t said he wants to prefer blacks over whites.
He professes Jesus, quotes the Bible.
He lives in a million $ home so dont vote 4 him because he’s like us.
He came from a single parent home to run 4 president of the BEST land in the world. So dont vote 4 him because you cant make it. Look whose behind the man. Whose pulling the strings? Is McCain the end all answer? No, but he could be the first step to taking our country back for all of us.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
You Obama fans are about to prove another one of Albert Einstein theories.
Albert Einstein: “Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity; I’m not sure about the former.”
Posted by: Old retired guy | October 31, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Selfish? To work hard for you income and want to keep it to support your family and way of life? So is Obama selfish since he did not give 38% of his Campaign funds to McCain?
Posted by: LRC | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
The present problems are not related to laissez-faire capitalism. The match that lit this fire was a government sponsored enterprises getting into a business that they had no business being in in the first place.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac essentially said to the banks: make absolutely any loans that you want, we’ve got you covered.
Barney Frank is parading around as if he is going to help to fix the mess that he, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelick and the mainly democrat supporters made.
Do your research Harv.
Posted by: Harv | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
I believe Castro promised a 1949 Chevy to every Cuban who accepted the revolution and guess what their still driving them. I can’t wait until until these “leftist” nut jobs don’t get their “Fair Share” of the Obama booty and they won’t so all you fools that think you will benefit by Obama’s promised hand-outs remember “A fool and his money are soon parted.”
Posted by: Bud | October 31, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Mike:
No country has ever taxed itself into prosperity. In fact there is quantifiable evidence that demonstrates that when you reduce the tax burden of business, the treasury actual collects more revenue. Why? People invest more. When people anticipate higher economic returns, they invest more. When they invest more wealth is created. More wealth creates more revenue.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Harv, who said: “… If you know what laissz-faire capitalism is, then tell me if the 1930s and the present day give evidence that the system fixes itself.
Spend a little time reading the late Milton Friedman’s take on the worsening of the GD due to poor policymaking and the Fed Reserve.
Recently, I read an article from a Saudi paper. It said, “The American economy only sneezed and the world blew up.” You might not like capitalism, but it can work — provided there’s no bad policymaking (does Community Reinvestment Act ring a bell? ).
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
How the hell does taxing the upper middle class help anyone else? someone explain that. I don’t get it.
Posted by: clewisinsinc | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Obama attended a racist church for twenty years…
Posted by: afred | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
You missed the point entirely.
More money to the middle class = more money to the rich. Being taxed at the same rates as we had under Clinton won’t destroy the economy any more than Clinton did.
Making $300,000 and having that last $50,000 taxed at 36% versus making $500,000 and having that last $250,000 taxed at 39% instead = the latter is better (and I’m using the actual tax %’s).
Large corporations just want to have lower taxes and hope that their income will still rise at the same time. It doesn’t usually work that way. So yes, it is BLIND selfishness that makes rich people want tax cuts to themselves instead of to the middle class which will result in higher incomes for them in the end. They want it both ways (people magically have money to spend AND lower taxes for the profits they make off of those people).
Posted by: Oye | October 31, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE. IF I WANT TO BE CHARITABLE I WILL. IF I WANT TO HELP SOMEBODY LESS FORTUNATE, THEN I WILL. WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO. OBAMA WANTS TO ENSURE THAT EVERYBOSY GETS THEIRS. HERE IS THE BIGGEST QUESTION. WHO HAS OBAMA HELPED. LOOK AT HIS BROTHER AND AUNT. IF THATS HOW HE HELPS US THEN I DONT WANT THE HELP. I SETTLE FOR WHAT I HAVE RIGHT NOW. WELL IF YALL JUST WANT THE HONEST TRUTH LOOK AT THE BUSH YEARS AFTER 9-11. THE ECONOMY SOARED, PEOPLE WERE BUYING STUFF AND THE ECONOMY WAR ROARING. ARGUE IF U WANT. THE ECONOMY WAS GOOD. IN 2006 ALL THE DOOM CAME IN AND IRONICALLY THAT IS WHEN THE DEMS REGAINED THE CONGRESS. ITS JUST ALL HIT HOME IN THE LAST 2-3 MONTHS. IT ONLY TOOK THE DEMS ABOUT 16 MONTHS FOR THEM TO DESTROY THE ECONOMY. YEAH BUSH HAS TURNED DEMOCRAT ALSO. OR CLOSE ENOUGH. AND NOW THAT ALL THESE PROBLEMS HAVE BEEN CREATED AND COME TO PASS, AND NOW IT SEEMS LIKE ALL ANYBODY WANTS TO DO, IS ELECT THE VERY PEOPLE WHO CREATED ALL THESE PROBLEMS.
Posted by: JJ | October 31, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
monkey, yes, you can get cheaper prescriptions in canada, but the people I have spoken to in regards to their overall healthcare experiences in both canada and the UK mention long waits to see specialists and have surgeries, weeks and months to find out test results even when it could be a fast moving cancer, etc and a general lack of any real specialized service. I would not want that for my family’s healthcare!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Hey Harv thanks for the ray of sanity. They are few and far between. You too Rod Man.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Selfish? THis BHO is clueless.
Also, I keep thinking about what a hypocrite this BHO is. Does anybody remember the tax returns that the and Joe Biden released? Those charitable contributions were very low.
Posted by: Gary Roseman | October 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
AMEN, JJ! I couldn’t have said it better myself!!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Well this is the way I see it. I live in a location where 35-45% of my paycheck is sent to the State and Federal Government. I happen to be fortunate enough to make enough to survive. Because I may sell my home est. price $265,000.00 which by no means is cheap.. But it is about the price of homes in the area that I live, and no, I am not wealthy. I would pay a 20-25% Capital Gains Tax under a President Obama. Normally, One would take the money from the sale of a home and invest that money into one of several other items (Usually another more expensive home) but now that will not be possible.. After paying 20-25% in capital gains one would have to purchase a less expensive home. What about my retirement? If the stock market does recover that is also considered for capital gains. So now I am paying additional monies to the government that I had not planned during my retirement. And since we are not sure the bottom of the classification of what is considered “rich” (Governor Bill Clinton and Senator AlGore called anyone who made $250,000/year millionaires because in 4 years they would have made a million dollars) and today Governor Bill Richardson said anyone making under $120,000 would get the tax cut. So let’s review, First it was $250,000/yr, then it was $200,000/yr, then Biden said $150,000 (btw has anyone seen him lately?) now Richardson says $120,000/yr. It has decreased quite a bit in the past year. I think it will be like when Bill Clinton was elected, it will be down to $50,000/yr and we only have ourselves to blame.
I think this is about selfishness… It is about knowing that we can pay our bills and be able to stay warm in the winter…
I would like to know when this country began to think that wealthy people owe others all of this? Why isn’t Nancy Pelosi or John F. Kerry donating their salaries to the poor? How did someone who has only worked in government become a millionaire? I am sure that ACORN did not pay him that much money. How does one get into Harvard and not have student loans? I agree with an earlier poster that if he is truly concerned with the poor why doesn’t he give some of that campaign money to charity? It would certainly carry more weight with me and other Americans.
Posted by: lawrench | October 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
I feel sorry for Barrack Obama that his victory is going to cause a lot of turmoil but i guess the saying goes ” shaken things up a bit.” and yet I am proud at the same time because despite the challenges he is facing he has maintained poise and confidence.
Posted by: Crystyle | October 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Obama will lower the $250,000 earnings tax hike. Mark my words, he will lower it to at least $70,000 per couple. The country cannot possibly afford what he promises, especially with his new programs.
He is ambitious. He wants to President and will say anything to be win.
College kids believe him, but at their own peril. They’ll be supporting me in a dozen or so years. LOL!!! I’m going to soak the government for all I can get! I’m sick of fighting it!
Posted by: ccollins | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary
Socialism
So”cial*ism\, n. [Cf. F. socialisme.] A theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
What is not to see with this Obama guy?
First he tells us he just wants to spread the wealth around. Now he tells us we are selfish to want to keep the money we earned ourselves despite all the taxes we already pay.
How utterly arrogant of us to want to decide for ourselves who, if anyone, should get our money.
For his information, class warfare and Feds redistributing the citizens money is not what built this country.
Obama gets even more power if he solely decides who get the money and when. That alone will cause a lot of problems.
I can not see how anything good comes from any of his policies. I see more strife, class envy, class warfare and, maybe, a lot of civil disobedience.
Maybe insurrection too.
Folks get upset at just the taking of their money for frivilous reasons. If that money is doled out to folks most undeserving of it…well, stuff begins to happen.
Posted by: Icabod Crane | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Hey Monkey go sit in the parking lot in Great Falls MT and talk to the hundreds of Canadians who come down here for medical services. They don’t come because their free medical services are so great.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Seems Obama is preying on people with short memories and limited understanding of basic economics.
Everyone had decent health care in the 1990? Tell that Hillary, who mucked it up as much as her ineptitide, vanity, and secrecy could allow.
Everyone could go to college in the 1990s? Anyone out there who coundn’t care to challenge this?
Obama isn’t interesting in educating anyone; rather, he feeds on the very misinformation and igorance he spreads.
Whatever good came out of the 1990s was despite, not because of, Clinton’s tax and spending increases. Take away these policies, the economy would have grown even more.
Obama also should be smart to know that when things happen together, one does not necessarily cause the other. But Obama knows these things: presidents get both credit and blame for cyclical economic trends outside of their control. More often than not, political meddling in these megaforces only leads to the law of unintended consequences.
Voters who want truth in this media-run-amok campaign must work and think critically to find it. Or else take the easy way out and vote for the candidate that most tells you all what you want to hear. This is one fundamnental American responsibility that Obama should encourage, not undermine for his own selfish virtue.
Posted by: Elite Egghead | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Finally an where Obama has true experience: selfishness.
He earned $4 million dollars last year from “Dreams of My Father,” ghost written by the terrorist William Ayres.
George Obama, his brother, lives on a dollar a month. Obama’s aunt is living in poverty in New England.
Obama knows firsthand how selfishness can hurt…he’s done it.
The best to you.
Posted by: Kelley Eidem | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
I suggest that Obama take a vow of poverty and be the first give all his money to fund his programs (spread the wealth). Then, since he wants to punish achievers then he should forfeit his Harvard degree and give it to someone who did not earn it. Unless he does both he is simply a hypocrit.
Posted by: Fred Scott | October 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
We have to be the stupidest country in the world to elect this guy. He’s a socialist, isn’t denying it, he is leading in the polls? Amazing, this guy has associated with just about every single left wing anti-American nut job around yet ABC, CBS, NBC refuses to vet this guy. Rest assured we will get what we deserve.
Posted by: Stephen Mooer | October 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
clewisinsinc, because of the 95% that BO says he is going to cut tax rates on, 40%, that’s right, 40%, of those people DO NOT PAY INCOME TAXES and yet come tax time every year, they WILL GET A CHECK IN THE MAIL! That check will come from the people who make over $150,000. By the way, it was $250,000, but a new ad says families that make $200,000 will be taxed and a couple of days ago, Biden amended that to $150,000. In addition, BO wants the Bush tax cuts to expire, so in reality, ALL people who pay income tax WILL see an increase in their taxes. and there you have Obamanomics 101.
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Americans going to Canada for medical care is myth. I had relatives who lived in Canada who had to come to the U.S. for health care because of the limited availability of specialized medicine and the long waits to receive it. To many Canadians have to travel to the U.S. and pay for specialized health care out of their own pockets or risk dying while waiting for it in their country. Free health care is no good if you can’t get it in a time to do any good.
Posted by: Norm | October 31, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
dantheman, thank you for serving our country! Thank you so much!!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
250,000 200,000 150,000 120,000…..Obama and co keep lowering the magic number.
Posted by: Geez | October 31, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
By and large red states give a far greater % of their income to charity then either Obama or Biden, so he can stick his sanctimony. Generosity is giving away your own stuff not someone else’s.
Posted by: g | October 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Obama is a crook
Posted by: afred | October 31, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
“Do your homework or stay out of the conversation and stay out of the way”…some lib genius
Only a Lib would be arrogant enough to make this comment…
Posted by: Big Ed | October 31, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Maria, you’re wrong. They might not pay income taxes, but those are hardly the only taxes we pay.
Everyone who works pays payroll taxes. Anyone who buys anything at a store pays sales taxes. Anyone who buys gas pays taxes on that, too. Sending a check to help relieve those taxes is hardly welfare.
Posted by: NoTaxes | October 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Hey Otis thanks for telling it like it is. And any of you out there who think Government run health care is wouderful try out a VA or Indian Health Care Center.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
This whole issue about what Obama “would do” is only because he has no real experience for anyone to know what he did do…
Which means Obama is not ready; he needs to go back and clean up the corruption his own backyard in Illinois.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I could NEVER sit back and enjoy a car or ANY OTHER SERVICE OR PROPERTY that was paid for in part or whole by a fellow hard working American, NEVER!
Posted by: Edward | October 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
david moore,
Quit being disingenuous with the typical liberal word tricks.
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I’ve tried reading all of the comments posted. But, the fear tactic used by the McCain campain and all of you supporters is ridiculous.
If raising our esteem in the eyes of the world, getting anywhere near fiscal resonsibility, or helping our disenfranchised, is socialist, sign me up.
I make less than any number posted by the Obama campaign for paying higher taxes, yet, I feel we’ll all have to pay more. I’m feeling like a fat cat now that I am part owner of an insurance company, the banking industry, the automotive industry…
The part of this discussion that is missing is the absolute, “scary,” choice of McCain’s running mate. If she doesn’t freak you out, you’ve been brainwashed beyond repair.
Posted by: Timmy | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I guess the new higher taxable level as of today’s Richardson comments is $120,000.00 and no one has said is that per person or per family. What about the self employed? They can pay as much as $1000.00 on an annual profit of $5000.00.
But what everybody misses is that if the Government takes more from those who produce more..all that happens is the producers drop down to the level of those who get the Government handout. Nobody moves up. You just have more poor people.
How will new jobs come from a larger base of poor people? Do you know any poor people who have the ability to hire you?
Obama’s tax proposals will not move a single person up. Besides even if his socialist scheme is passed, in 5 to 10 years the same producers will wind up holding all the wealth again. Trust fund babies aside, they had more wealth in the first place because they were people who produced at an extraordinary level, and that can not be taken from them.
Posted by: BlueDog | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
It’s not that the super rich are being taxed too much. It’s that they actually pay too little after all their tax avoidance schemes are taken into account. Remember that Warren Buffett commented that he pays less in taxes than his secretary. And don’t forget the UBS secret Swiss acct tax evasion scandal.
The real problem is that he wants to overtax the well to do – those between $200k and $500k who are by no stretch of the imagination rich in high cost of living areas and they don’t engage in complex tax avoidance schemes.
Over 30% of Americans don’t pay ANY federal income taxes. And the bottom 50% pay 3%. Instead of the Democrats redistributing the wealth they should be trying to change policies to encourage lower income workers and those on welfare to be more productive. Certainly the policies that have and are being pursued have wrought havoc on the lower and middle class. Millions of illegal immigrants have eroded wages and increased unemployment rates for teenagers and blacks. Millions of legal immigrants and H1-B visa holders have eroded white collar wages and job security. And millions of manufacturing jobs have gone overseas. The Democrats created the mortgage mess (this was admitted by Barney Frank) by being overly aggressive with home ownership rates.
From the PostChronicle
“Obama says he wants to return roughly to the tax system in place during the Clinton years. But in 1994 (after Clinton raised the top tax rate in what was the largest tax increase in history), the top 5 percent of earners paid only 48 percent of all taxes, not today’s 60 percent. Even after the boom years of the late 1990s, the wealthiest 5 percent were shouldering less of the tax burden than today’s wealthy, about 55 percent. And the total revenues collected from them were less than today as well. ”
Obama wants to increase the percentage of Americans not paying taxes to 40%. That’s highway robbery.
Posted by: notfooled | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Kelly Eidem: “George Obama, his brother, lives on a dollar a month.”
George Obama: “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Would you lemmings who are going to vote for either of these total socialist (if not outright Marxist) buffoons please wake up to the fact that in 1913 private bankers took over the United States with the passage of the abominable Federal Reserve Act? It doesn’t matter who wins this. Their goal is a global one world financial order run solely by the super rich. America will never be free until we take back control over our money supply. I refer you to G. Edward Griffin’s The Creature from Jekyll Island for a clear understanding of just what we are living under. Thanks for reading.
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
This BHO is clueless. This guy will lose on Tuesday.
What a hypocrite. Yes, we all know about his relatives in poverty, and remember those tax returns that he and Joe Biden released? How much was given to charity? Talk about selfishness…
Posted by: Gary | October 31, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
I saw a couple folks saying Obama’s tax plan wouldn’t increase a non-taxpayer’s refund……. Was that Grape or Cherry Kool Aid?? Read the WSJ column titled “Obama’s 95% Illusion” from 10.13.08. Think you’ll sing a different tune; hint a “refundable credit” is a check in the mail. Of 7 (yes, boys and girls, seven)new tax credits, 6 would be refundable. It’s the Pied Piper of Clintondom all over again. Go Sarah!! And bring the old guy along.
Posted by: SteveBob | October 31, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I am African American Female Small Business owner and have owned my business for over 27 years I just turned 50 years old and have Never ever in my life time recieved a tax break or tax return from the government Never, and never thougth about cheating the Government either. I have a College Degree and have made well over $150,000 a year in my Health and Fitness Business. I have never received a small business loan for my business or granted a business line of Credit or even a Credit Card for that matter, because I was always informed that the Small Business loans for Minority Women meant White Women who are considered the Minority when it comes to Business Loans for Women(Comments from White Male Bankers). There are lots of African American Women in this same catagory, but we made it anyhow and when I look at how our Government has allowed these big Companies to get away with mis-management of Money and then get more, I thank God for the gift that he gave me to contiue to endure anyhow. While all you high rollers, big wigs, and millionairs suffer and try to figure what your going to do now, its people and business’ like me that just wake up every morning free to spend, free to shop, free to do whatever I please because we don’t live or run our business’ on CREDIT as most of you do, a 845 Beacon score can’t even get you 0% financing Now Based on your Debt to income ratio I see you crying everyday and wondering why Not!. It’s time for a change I thank God for Senator Obama no body really knows what either candidate will do, but for someone who doesn’t even know how many houses he owns he surely doesn’t know or care about the minority population in this country Rich or Poor and that affects me! Maybe now I have a chance with the Obama team as it’s not about Obama it’s about the Democratic way of life, which we are for all people not just some people.
Posted by: AG | October 31, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
This whole issue about what Obama “would do” is only because he has no real experience for anyone to know what he “did do”…
Which means Obama is not ready; he needs to go back and clean up the corruption his own backyard in Illinois.
To prove what he can do, what he claims he can do.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
David moore, you say speard the burden evenly? You want bill gates to buy you a Ferrari? is that more fair to you? how about he give everyone in the world one dollar and he goes broke, is that fair? When I was in Maryland about to leave the country for Kuwait I was dressed in cilivan clothes and I wanted to call my mom one last time before I left. I only had dollar bills, so I figured I’ll ask some of my country men to break one for some quaters. Most people just blew me off when I said excuse me, a group of black women grabbed their purses like I was going to rob them. ALL I WANTED WAS 4 QUARTERS FOR A DOLLAR!!!! and you want other people to fix everything for you
Posted by: dantheman | October 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Thank you Mr. Tapper for mentioning Ayn Rand’s book. I am actually part-way through it and it’s the first thing that came to mind after hearing Sen. Obama’s Quotes.
Posted by: Torin | October 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
to “notaxes” I absolutely did NOT say they pay no taxes. I said they pay no INCOME tax, which is entirely correct. I’m not speaking talking points; I’m an intelligent person and I understand economics having been a business major in college. It is 100% true that 40% does not pay income tax and yet they will in effect be getting a “refund” every tax year under BO’s plan. Yes, we all pay taxes on purchases, food, luxury items, etc. So you are saying people should get a rebate for paying sales tax? and that makes sense how?
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
American Heritage Dictionary
(sō’shə-lĭz’əm)
n.
The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
I am so pleased that the voters are seeing through Obamanations sneaky tactics! He is such a liar. He purposely leaves out information in his speeches. He is trying to destroy Joe the plumber by having his thugs go through his personal history and try to discredit him. Joe did not seek Obama out to ask him a simple question about taxes. Obama does not like anyone disagreeing with him and if you do you will disappear and never be seen again!
Posted by: candyapple | October 31, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
This whole issue about what Obama “would do” is only because he has no real experience for anyone to know what he “did do”…
Which means Obama is not ready; he needs to go back and clean up the corruption his own backyard, in Illinois.
To prove that he can do what he claims he can do.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
AG,
I assume that you mean all these billionaires are declaring their intent to vote for Obama (for example, Warren Buffett). Do you honestly believe these folks are actually going to pay more taxes during an Obama presidency? They can afford to back Obama; after all these folks already have their money in tax shelters.
And you’re right about God helping us in our time of need; that’s why he’s allowed John McCain to perservere through all the trials of his life so he can make his stand on behalf of this country and defeat Obama. God Bless America!
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
…and 51% of tis country might elect this president. I understand wanting something new…and Obama is riding that wave…but please…Obama is the wrong person…this will be a horrible next four years…robbing from the rich and giving to the…Government…Obama is not Robinhood…Robinhood took from the rich was was not theirs and gave it to the poor…not Robbed what belongs to the rich and give it to, not the poor, but the Government…distribution of wealth is power…and a corupt power at that!
Posted by: chip | October 31, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Most wealth in this country is not made through “work” but through inheritance, and dividends off investments.(Such sweat inducing labor)
As far as the poor, most are hard-working,trying to help their families. Yet somehow their hard labor is undervalued in your corporate run society.
Your tax dollars go towards infrastructure which includes giving people with limited opportunties more opportunities so they can make something of themselves. Just like roads benefit us all, good schools benefit us all because they produce productive citizens.
BTW, opportunities are not equal in this country and any one who has eyes can see that but keep believing that if you want to hold on to your artifical “individualist” anti-christian, “Greed is good” ideology.
And this vaunted middleclass that everyone valorizes:
Wouldn’t be here without government programs like the G.I. Bill(BTW, a large segment of the veteran population were kept from partaking of this program. Guess who they were)
and the establishment of public schools.
Posted by: Dark | October 31, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Hey AG you are my kind of people. Work hard and pulled your self up with out Government help. Great! Me too, however, I can’t agree that I want any of there help. Don’t need it, don’t want it because I found out long time ago that it always comes with strings attached. And as my hero Thomas Jefferson says:The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. —Thomas Jefferson
Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have … The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. —Thomas Jefferson
The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. —Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Ed…so which rich people would you struggle to find that about? Who gets to decide? You?
Posted by: Frank H | October 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
I just wrote a check for $1,000 to the local Boys & Girls Club. That’s the way we should be dealing with all of the social ills that Mr. Obama feels he must cure. If you have the funds (hint, hint my non-charitable liberal friends) make a charitable gift to a credible not-for-profit organization that will make a diference in your community. Just don’t force me to send more of my hard earned money through a bloated bureacracy, only to have scraps end up helping those it should. I can do a much better job of helping my community be a better place.
Posted by: Baja | October 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Warren Buffett wants to pay more taxes the Greedy ba s tard can’t apparently give on his own and need Government to force him. Luckily, most businesses do not have that problem.
Google it..it all over the web,
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Errr…that was for jozsef…NOT Ed.
Posted by: Frank H | October 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Monkey, I don’t know what you are asking me, I’m not in the health care industry, although I vounteered at a hospital for 4+ years and i do know that universal healthcare is not the way to go. The Govt can barely handle the programs on it’s plate now. BILLIONS a year go to people who are scamming the govt. I can only imagine how much would be scammed if they added helathcare to that overfilled plate!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
AG: It’s good you’ve succeeded. What makes you think no one else has a hard time succeeding?
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
For all of those who truly believe O’Robin Hood-Bama will only take from others an not you, consider that if you have anything he might consider a “luxury” that others do not, he will take it upon himself to fix that. If you want to buy a new car, expect a “fairness tax” to help those that cannot afford one. If you want a new TV, you will subsidize one for that poor “bro” who cannot. It’s no different when you get a paycheck and your taxes are used to support the unemployed and unmarried “sista” with 3 kids from different “players”. That’s what he calls Hope and Change.
Posted by: M.M.C. | October 31, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
In Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism (Basic Books),
Arthur C. Brooks finds that religious conservatives are far more charitable than secular liberals, and that those who support the idea that government should redistribute income are among the least likely to dig into their own wallets to help others
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
I own a small business and I truly work to death. I work average 140 hours a week, give and take. After paying all my expenses I still have to worry about paying my taxes. After paying my living expenses, often times I do not have enough money left to pay for my taxes. I cannot even afford to pay my medical insurance. On the other hand, there are people(poors??) who never have to get up 4 a.m. and not being able to retire before 12:00 a.m.like I do. Those so called “poors” receive FREE MEDICAL CARE, FREE FOOD, FREE HOUSING AND MONEY besides everything else. Now how does it make sense when I work to death to make money to pay for these expenses, others(poors) get EVERYTHING FOR FREE??? I am not saying that I don’t want to help poors but WHY SHOULD I WORK TO DEATH SO THAT I CAN PAY FOR THEIR FREE MEAL? May be they are not trying as hard as I do. What Mr. Obama is saying to me is that he does not care what happens to me as long as poors are taken care of.. I would be happy to pay my share of taxes so long as I don’t have to GIVEAWAY for those who are too lazy to work 20/7 as I do. WHO IS TO SAY WHAT’S FAIR? WHAT ABOUT ME? I think that Mr. McCain is an innocent victim of the current economy. We all know that Mr. McCain is much better qualified as a president than Mr. Obama. I am also hearing that Mr. Obama is a Muslim? Is that true? Even though it might be a rumor, wouldn’t there be some truth in it? What happens if Mr. Obama really is a Muslim? What happens to this country? I would like to hear some comments on this issue.
Posted by: cheryl A. | October 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
I’ve seen Buffett’s name thrown around.
Warren Buffett (who made his fortune in insurance) and George Soros (who made his fortune shorting currency) are part of the Democracy Alliance. They want to reshape our form of government, not make us rich. Uber-wealthy like to do this. They are what you’d call philanthrocapitalists. Soros is absolutely hated in other parts of the world because of his tentacles in other countries’ elections. Google both men and Democracy Alliance and see what you find. At a certain point, it’s no longer about Obama but the money behind him. And the men with the money we most certainly didn’t elect.
Posted by: LouAnn | October 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Darkmoor, you are absolutely WRONG. The overhelming majority of wealth in this country is self made.
Simply wanting to enjoy the fruits of your own labor and decide on your own how it is to be spent is not greed, it’s called common freaking sense. If I want to spend every dime I make on buying vintage rubix cubes that is my business, not the governments. Outside of paying for roads, the military and police, I owe nothing else to society. If I feel like giving to charity, that is my own choice and should not be imposed on me by socialist totalitarian, liberty thieves. Oh, and EVERYBODY has the EXACT same opportunities in this country. The difference is some people take advantage of them and some don’t. Some people are smart and some are stupid. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Kile | October 31, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
It’s not just hard work that makes money, it’s money that makes money. Anybody who actually makes over $250K a year knows this very well (their personal financial advisors certainly do). A coal miner can work hard until he drops dead and he still won’t ever make 1/1000 of what a hedge fund manager makes in a year (hedge funds, by the way, that have made a killing during this mortgage crisis precisely by betting on the collapse of the housing market). So please, less self-righteousness about how the rich have earned every penny. The poor have earned every penny too. We still need roads and schools and adequate healthcare, and who should pay more for that? The poor, or the rich? Because somebody has to. And if you’re fortunate enough to make over $250K a year, why complain about a few percentage more in taxes? Why not feel good about contributing more to this country that we all share?
Posted by: Jenny | October 31, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Retired old guy: Most wealth is inherited and not earned through work? I would like to see some numbers. How was it generated in the first place, and how is it maintained?
As for Warren Buffet and George Soros, do you think their support of leftist politicians is unrewarded?
Posted by: Gary Roseman | October 31, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Maria123; Maria I just met a girl named Maria. Ops sorry about that got carried away. But thank god for people like you. Every government run program throws money away by the ton. Medicare fraud is in excess of 31%. The federal budget for 2006 2.2 trillion $ for 2009 #2 trillion $ and Obama wants to add trillions more. How much is enough when the country is already bankrupt. I won’t be around to see the effects but alot of you will have to pay for it with ever decreasing living standards.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
A vote for Obama is a vote for change
Higher taxes..pelosipaloosa and harry reams
Posted by: afred | October 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
I read every Ayn Rand book when I was in high school. Including Athem, and that rambles without a story line like Atlas Shrugged. Ayn Rand makes a good argument but she’s not realistic. Her theories only work if people have the character, strength and ethics of John Gault or Howard Roark. Unfortunately the world is full of Ken Lays.
Posted by: wlw100 | October 31, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
say that 2009 budget is 3.2 trillion. Sorry about that.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Monkey, I’m starting to lose a little respect for you…We all have to use our brains to discern what issues are important to us and then educate ourselves as best we can so we understand at least the basics in layman’s terms. I assure you I am informed enough to know that healthcare should absolutely NOT be taken over by the govt. I’ve worked in a hospital, I’ve spoken to numerous people who HAVE had universal coverage and I’ve read enough reports from people who do know what they are talking about to know that i do NOT want that for my family or our country. got it?
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Today I sold all my stocks and bonds.
I bought guns, food water euros and Gold.
I believe Obama’s change is similar to Hitler’s “change”.
Obama is a Muslim by birth and will have to Obey the commands of his Imam.
Kill the Christians and Jews his Imam will order him and Obama will have no choice but butcher Us.
Obama hates Wall Street and Rich people, so He will close down Wall Street and Your stocks will be worth zero.
Obama believes Wall Street is evil full of thieves and crooks and must be done away with.
He will take your “excesive pensions” and 401 ks and give it to unemployed blacks for crack money.
So I started looking for a safe heaven in Europe.
Remember the smart Jews who didn’t believe in Hitler’s Change sold everything and escaped to neutral countries and lived. But the ones who believed blindly in Hitlers speeches
were butchered and gassed.
Obama I believe will kill us all.
He’s an African and to him white civilization means nothing but death.
I’ll be gone to Europe very soon.
You do the same if u r smart.
May God Save us all!!
Posted by: rick301 | October 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I am a reporter with Jett Magazine. There are a LOT of false rumours spreading around, so let me clear up a few of these misconceptions. 1) While I am now traveling on Senator Obama’s plane with the rest of the press, I am not given any special priviledges. I sit on row nearest the Senator and am invited to many meetings, but I don’t believe this is because of race. 2) Jett endorses Senator Obama but not for the reasons you think. We agree with his policies that provide relief to hard working african americans. 3) Jett will not disparage Govenor Palin. We believe everyone should be given the change to run for office, regardless of their experience or qualifications.
I look forward to covering the race in the last few days. Please look for my blog in Jett.
Peace Out,
Posted by: Simeon Booker | October 31, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
We have been waging war on poverty for 40 years with the start of the Great Society – a price tag of untold trillions of tax payers property spent. What is the exit strategy from this war? What are the benchmarks? Obama says that high taxes are good for the economy as everyone’s boat floats. This is the same steaming smelly pile of logic that has imprisoned untold millions as they trade in their God given potential for the promise of mediocrity. Those on the receiving end of Government handouts are the modern day serf who, with a vote, buys crumbs off the table of a self-serving federal bureaucracy. Bottom line: More people are on the government dole since this war on poverty started. If high taxes worked 40 years ago, we wouldn’t need to raise them again today.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I find it sad that by not having decent health care I am considered lazy or by wanting decent health care I am considered lazy. My husband works hard and I attend school in order to hopefully provide more for my family when I graduate and to hopefully get better health care. We were doing just fine until I got sick. I now have close to $30,000 in medical bills because I got sick. I know may more who have had to lose their homes because of medical bills. My insurance company sucks and is refusing to pay most of the bill. I just find it hard to believe that we as a nation find it wrong to pay higher taxes so all, yes I said ALL can have decent health care. I would pay higher taxes to have everyone covered. So, yes I think it is selfish to not want to ensure healthcare for everyone. It appears to many around the world that we are a selfish nation. It is all about me and only me. Well, wait until it is your turn to get sick and your insurance company refuses to pay. It can and does happen. If I hear one more time about the long lines for medical care in other countries like Great Britian I am going to scream. Most of my family lives in Great Britian and none have to wait in line to be seen by a doctor, or to have surgery or to have tests done. It is all propaganda.
Posted by: tree | October 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
What most of you people happy with higher taxes and Obama don’t understand is supply creates wealth not demand. Eveyone wants stuff but you only get rich creating things people want. He can try to shame me all he wants. I work hard and I give MY money to the charities I choose. I DON’T want the government to pick for me. This is socialism pure and simple.
Posted by: Bill M | October 31, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Bubba66: You just recited my life. I’m 69 went to work at 14 in the Navy at 19 went to Viet Nam worked for forty years to get where I am at and can’t imagine voting for a Marxist when I spent all my life opposing them. I for one will “cling to my guns” before I give up one red cent other than to whom I choose.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Compassion starts at home. Obama is such a hypocrite.
McCain-Palin in a landslide. The MSM won’t know what hit them.
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
I have worked to support myself and family for the past 45 years. I have raised 3 daughters and 4 grandkids. I am an average Joe who pays my mortgage, taxes and living expenses. I take offense when someone says I am selfish. I am paying for one grandkid to go through college and the other three are all working and living on their own. All three of my daughters are working and have families also.So don’t give me this crap that I am selfish. All the freeloaders have the same chance at life as my family. They just don’t want to take it.
Posted by: Norm | October 31, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Tree, i am sorry for your experience with health coverage, but I cannot agree that universal coverage is the way to go. Should insurance companies be held accountable for all of the “denieds” they stamp on referalls? Of course! Do they need a serious overhall so that they can not get away with denying life saving treatment only because they deem it risky or experimental? Absolutely! Do I want my healthcare and in effect my life to be in the hands of the govt? NO WAY! Perhaps their could be a fund set aside for people who rack up large bills and need some assistance…maybe that already exists. Do I think that healthcare in this country could be better? Yes! But there is nothing that could convince me that the govt can take care of my better than I can!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Tree;
In America we do help, we have many local agencies and there is government help, for those who qualify. We have family support and sometimes we might have to double up, with family, to make payments. People from under our border make money and send the type of money you owe in a couple of years.
Many seem to think that this is to much to give up, yet many every year prove it can be done.
America does not need to be top heavy like Europe in order to compete in todays world.
That is a mistake for America.
If people want to give more they can, but it is thier choice, not Obama’s
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Sorry Monkey, i get a little riled up lately with all this debating :) I too love that we are able to have this discourse. I LOVE that we are all free to disagree with one another. I believe that no matter who wins come tuesday that we will remain a great nation and we’ll all learn to live under ideals that are less than our own, as we have been doing the last few years, lol. Consider my respect restored! xo
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I am opposed to the election of Mr. Obama because I believe he is an “empty suit” who will be dominated by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.
On taxes, any honest adult who has ever worked for a State or the Federal government will admit that much of the tax money spent by government is totally wasted. Few people will believe that, but I worked in State government for over twenty years, and I promise you that it is true. I do not mind paying income taxes for the defense of the country, and other limited but necessary Federal funcations, but there is so much waste that it is disheartening to think that our tax dollars are spent in that way. If the people of the US received their full wages or salaries, without deductions for taxes, and then had to send a tax-payment to the Fed every month, this country would have a completely different tax structure.
I want my hard earned money to go for value received, not for bureaucratic functions.
Posted by: Dolly | October 31, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
In Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism (Basic Books),
Arthur C. Brooks finds that religious conservatives are far more charitable than secular liberals, and that those who support the idea that government should redistribute income are among the least likely to dig into their own wallets to help others.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Right on, LouAnn! Soros and his minions have sown discord and plundered every country where they’ve shown up; whether it’s Malaysia, Thailand, France or the Ukraine.
For all of you Obama fans out there- he is owned by George Soros (after all, Soros admitted he bought the Democratic Party with his huge contributions a few years ago). Do you think Soros really cares about the US? He didn’t put Obama forth because Obama is a uniter; he did it because Obama is even more divisive than Hillary. Soros plans to cash in by weakening the US through Obama’s implementation of his economic and social programs (just like Soros did in the Ukraine and a few other Eastern European countries where he got involved in the election process).
Beware Obama fans, Obama is working for Geroge Soros, not the citizens of the US.
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Norm,
“So don’t give me this crap that I am selfish. All the freeloaders have the same chance at life as my family. They just don’t want to take it.”
Your story is great. Not all the “freeloaders” don’t have a chance without you helping them get a leg up. Barack Obama was once a “freeloader” if you consider those that take food stamps freeloaders. Certain social programs work, period.
What Obama wants to restore is human decency and compassion for others. That is what was lost during the Bush years. That “selfish” mentality is what will be further pushed if McCain becomes President.
You can’t claim to be pro-America AND not be willing to help a fellow patriot. Think about it.
Besides that, helping your fellow citizens helps yourself and your family. Less poverty, less crime.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
retired old guy: Thank you for your service to our country! Appreciate the sacrifices you made on our behalf so we can have debates like on this board!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Selfishness, is allowing your aunt to live in a rundown Boston slum while you party down in a multi-million dollar mansion.
Selfishness is allowing your half-brother in Kenya to live in a mud hut on $12 a year, while your wife eats a lobster and caviar afternoon snack to the tune of $477, equal to the equivalent of 37.5 times your half-brother’s yearly income.
The end of selfishness begins by you for the first time, looking in the mirror, Senator Obama.
Why not truly be your Brother’s Keeper and help your own flesh and blood out, Barry?
Posted by: Red | October 31, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Yes, the Economist endorsed Obama yesterday. Also people really need to ask themselves, “what would Jesus do”? He would help the underpriviledged gain skills and respect through increased opportunities. He would insure that healthcare is a right and not a priviledge. Those who call Obama a Marxist are calling Jesus a Marxist.
Posted by: Linda | October 31, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Thanks for writing on such an important issue, Mr. Tapper. You got to the essense of the matter. Individuals have the right to keep the money that they earn. Being selfish is moral. Placing your life and your goals as your highest priority is the way everyone should live. Our lives don’t belong to others and they don’t belong to Washington or Obama or McCain. Leave us free to live our own lives and we’ll leave you free to live yours.
Posted by: Kurt | October 31, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Keith, I consider being defined as SELFISH, “demonizing”. If you are seen as selfish, you certainly are not looked upon with favor. Never mind the fact that we paid for our own educations, have educated our own children with OUR dollar, and while our income was substantially less than the Obama’s, we donated more. I don’t expect to pay less in taxes, and yes, we can afford to pay more, but calling us selfish and painting us in a blanket of bad light isn’t exactly what I call “reaching across the aisle”! Although, being a Chicagoan, I’m not surprised by his arrogance. Sadly, when you’ve been exposed to it arrogant, corrupt politics for as long as we have been, you tend to get used to it. And one last item; if Obama, Oprah, Farrakhan, Jackson, Ayers, Daley, Emanuel, Wright, etc., have a lock on what should be done for the nation, why haven’t they done it for Chicago? We’re now the murder capital of the US!
Posted by: Jenny | October 31, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Jesus might ask a person to do it, but he would never ask government to force it.
You are trying to replace the role of the church and charities with government.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
How much did Biden donate to charity again? Who’s the selfish one?
Posted by: Biggle | October 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Because my father suffered from a multitude of terminal,cardiac related illnesses from the time I was a young boy, my childhood was one of poverty.I was unable to attend college full time because I had to work to help support my family. I worked full time while attending college at night and was awarded bachelors and masters degrees concurrently, Summa Cum Laude. I put in long hours at work while others came in late and left early. In time, with hard work and diligence, I was able to become somewhat successful in my chosen career.
Will someone please explain to me the fairness of why I am now going to have to share the fruits of all my years of study and hard work with the semi-literate high school dropout at McDonalds who can’t even get my order correct?
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
To Aengil
As reported by the Telegraph (hardly a conservative paper – very left leaning)
George Obama “I leave on less than a dollar a day”
Posted by: Alfred | October 31, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
GPaul,
If all of the people who were against Obama’s “spread the wealth” idea decided to leave as you suggest, there would be more hands out than hand outs to fill them.
An Obama win will insure hope and change in 2 more years when the Congress is up for a vote… like it did when the Republicans took charge of Congress.
When Obama can’t live up to his promises to people who thought he was the Messiah, they will be crying “crucify him”.
Posted by: Abe Noxious | October 31, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Call it what you wish. Karl Marx said it best: “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” Karl Marx, Father of Communism
Posted by: Del | October 31, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Linda, I know Jesus, and Jesus was no marxist!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Jesus could just lay his hands upon the sick and heal them, if you really know what Jesus did.
Obama is not Jesus and neither is the Government.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
WWJD? I believe he would prefer a hand up and not a hand out. Compassion is believing in the strength of others and letting them be the best they can be. Perpetual welfare is not the answer. This has been proved time and time again.
Instead of giving them 1 small fish, teach them how to fish.
Posted by: hammer | October 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
It really doesn’t matter who spent more on clothes (Sara $150,000.00) it only matters to us that care. Did I mention that I have to work four years for what she spent in one day?
Posted by: Monkey | October 31, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Regaring Jesus as a Socialist, I think he would have agreed with the concept “I am my brother’s keeper” not “Rome is my brother’s keeper.” People who think the government should tax and use to money to help others are too lazy or selfish to do it themselves.
Posted by: Linoge | October 31, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
I am confused with the terms socialism and marxism. You all seem to be such experts, please explain them to me.
BTW, by these standards, here are some other socialist:
Roanald Reagan – the earned income tax credit ( I never would have thought but I guess so)
Teddy Roosevelt – McCain’s hero but wanted progressive tax, anti-trust, work place standard, parks ( he was a hunter too), some healthcare system. Almost all Americans then, and most now, believe in progressive taxation.
Dwight Eisenhower and FDR – Public works projects, like highways and power plants.
John McCain – used to believe in progressive taxation and opposed tax cuts in general and especially for the rich during war but he has sold his soul.
He also wants nuclear power. They cannot be built without government funds. Private industry and insurance will not touch them without government money.
George Bush – distribute money from average people and the government to 1/10 of 1%( mostly) and 1% of the food chain.
Made a ton of money off of a government financed baseball stadium where they “took” property from small property owners. He was a business failure until he got government money.
And of course, there is our glorious bailout for the banks. Privatize the profits, soicalize the losses on to average folks.
Confusing, isn’t it ?!!
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
where is the money going to go? redistributing the wealth is not a bad thing. yes we all work hard and want to keep our money to our self but sometimes there comes a time that we need to help each other. we should not have to be made to do that but some people refuse to help other people. we are americans. america has always helped other countries but we are complaining about spreading the wealth? that is crazy. some people need help, what is wrong with lending a helping hand. in this country the rich have always gotten richer and the poor just struggle to make ends meet. is that how we are, looking down on people who cant live on your level? i hate how this election has turned us against each other, black, white, rich, poor,etc. what are we teaching our kids? HATE! I feel like bush has f***** up the country so bad we had to borrow money from China ($600 billion) that we must pay back on top of a $10 trillion deficit. what is going to happen when we cant pay it back? everyone’s taxes will be raised. i dont care what no one says, they will have to raise taxes to get us out of debt. mccain may say, he will not raise people taxes, but he is lieing. what is he going to do, take money out of his account? hell no, he is not. he is going to raise our taxes. america is no longer a threat to anyone. other countries use to look up to us but not anymore. they are laughing at us. i would not vote for mccain because he to me is just like voting for bush. he was along the side of bush putting us in debt. agreeing with bush 90% of the time. it is because of bush that we are in the debt and you people want to put him back in. yes i said him back in because bush endorsed him. if he has a question while in presidency, who do you think he will call? he will call bush for his advice. is that what you want? if he was to die, palin would be our president. that is SAD! people say that obama is not experienced enough to be president. well is palin? obama is def more experienced than her. so that brings me to my question. what is the REAL reason you wont vote for obama? it has nothing to do with the taxes or non of that. i listen to people talk and all they ever say is that bill ayers mess and mr wright. that is not enough. the world is coming to an end right before our eyes. people we need to wake up and join together not move further apart. i feel this election has moved us further apart. when 9/11 happened, people was so loving toward each other, what happened? is it because we have a black man running for president. now i read things that i am offended by and i dont get offended by much. i am a dem, i am not racist, communist, or sexist. i am a woman and i would NEVER EVER PUT SARAH PALIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE! MCCAIN YOU SHOULD HAVE CHOSEN A BETTER VP.
Posted by: ncobama | October 31, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Bill M,
Most of the comments I read about socialism are from people who clearly don’t understand what socialism is.
“Joe the Plumber” claims he’s afraid of taxes that will prevent him from buying a business. In case you don’t know, “Joe the Plumber” didn’t pay his taxes, so Joe’s running from what he knows nothing about. If tax structures under Republicans was so great, why hasn’t “Joe the Plumber” paid his? He’s cheated his neighbors by not paying taxes!
If only he could unselfishly value someone other than himself, perhaps another business that specializes in tax preparation — he’d find out that he probably won’t owe taxes under Obama.
“Joe the Plumber” is the epitome of “fear of knowledge” which enables selfish ignorance.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Maria123,
I understand that yes there are local charities set up to help and yes there are programs if you qualify to help with medical bills. Guess what, I do not qualify. I am too young or old or the wrong faith and we make too much money. I also do not have family I can ask to help out with money to pay my medical bills. They struggling too. My father in law is being screwed by his company he has worked for many years and has nothing to spare. My other in laws are struggling with their medical bills because they had the nerve to get cancer and have a child with autisim. My family in Great Britian can not believe or even comprehend the stress I have because of medical bills. Of course, they have teased to move over there, I just might take them up on the offer. However, I love this country and I am not going to give up on it. Of course, I have to also have to pay off my medical bills before I go anywhere.
Posted by: Tree | October 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Gary Roseman: Want a litt history I’ll give you some. Went to work at 14 washing windows, worked summers cutting lawns at 16 went to work in the oil fields in ND went into the Navy at 18 went to Viet Nam at 20. After that I worked surveying electric lines, worked as a roffer, tank builder, on pipelines, as an auto mechanic. Went to work for Texaco at 33 and retired at 65 having put my wife through college and raised 3 kids to of whom are through school and one working on a doctors degree. In that time I increased my neet worth from 36 cents on Christmas day 1969 to over 3/4 million dollars by hard work and frugal living and wise investments. Never earned over 50,000 per year in my life. Now tell why should I be ashamed of what I have and what moral justification do you or anyone have on what is mine? I have no problem helping anyone who can’t help themselves and I do. But I feel no compunction to help those who wouldn’t help themselves when given the same opportunity I have had.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
We live in Indiana and send our children to a catholic school ($8,000 a year) because we cannot send them to the local public school…gangs, fights, problem children (they closed the alternative school and put them back into the regular classes…real smart)and single parents or living with their grandma or “auntie”.
I work two jobs and my wife works as a nurse to ensure that our kids have a better tomorrow.
When will Mr. Obama learn that continuing to “give” to those who don’t want to earn it will put this country on it’s ass…how about “teach a man to fish”?
I have worked in government and giving does not work…it only feeds into a system of “give me more”. I have worked incredibly hard over the years to have a nice house (I built it myself)and some money in the bank. Guess what…tuition for high school and college is right around the bend…no vouchers with Mr. Obama but a broken school system that has NO accoutability. Sorry…my kids will not be apart of that.
I guess I will have to get a third job to make this happen. Heard a great one…guy goes into a restaurant and the waiter is sporting a huge Obama button…guy eats his meal, gets his bill and places the money on the check and starts to walk out…the waiter comes over to him and says, was there something wrong with the service? The diner states no it was great but I’m going to donate the tip I was going to give you to the next begger on the street I see. The waiter said that’s not fair and the diner states that’s what Mr. Obama will do for you.
George Bush is certainly not a Regan Republican and one who was a big let down but I’m going to give John McCain the benefit of the doubt. And should Mr. Obama win, I will be looking for some extra work to keep the house and the kids going. Like most good people, good parents will sacrafice all they have for their children…we are no different. Please vote for the best qualified candidate…one that reflects what America can be agin.
Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Does anyone know where she spends the cash? I’d love to know how much of Alaska’s money she spends…
Posted by: Monkey | October 31, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
dc, much props ,
although he bailed the repulican party to find hope , alan keys will always be a republican !!
as for obama ,
he has everyone fooled and he has vengence in his mind , not the country who’s flag he won’t salute !!!
we are all in shock that this man is even considered to lead this country !!
Posted by: john | October 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
If Obama runs the government the way he ran his campaign we are all in trouble. He won’t be able to stop with those who make over 250,000. With his views he won’t be cutting budgets and slimming government to run more effeciently. He’ll have give aways and programs and make government more intrusive in our lives, all the while waiting at our door at the end our work day needing more money for his grand plan. Our small business is run simply, no frills, everyone works hard all day and we pay our bills off at the end of the month. So don’t slap your “spin” on me with your “take from the rich and give to the hardworking everyman”. We may make over 250,000, but we work 12 hour days, 6 days a week, pay our bills off each month, live on a budget and within our means and help out our employees or family members when they need it….and that’s what I call patriotic and selfless.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
sorry about the typo’s but I was a little hot.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Joe the Plumber” didn’t pay his taxes….
Billy M,
Sorry Billy boy, you’re a liar
Posted by: Chuck | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
How can you trust a candidate that will not prove that they are US citizen when he had multiple opportunities. Could have made it a publicity stunt. Now the governor of the state says you can’t see the record. And why would a foreign country also seal its records? Why would he have records that would need to be sealed in a foreign country?
Posted by: JK | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Okay, let me get this straight. If we don’t want higher taxes pulled out of our bank accounts we are “selfish” (says Obama) and “unpatriotic” (says Biden.) And if we disagree with them, we get roughed up by their buddies like happened to Joe the Plumber…. or kicked out of their club like happens to any media person who dares ask a tough question.
It seems to me that Obama and Biden started acting like a couple of spoiled rotten brats the second things weren’t going totally their way.
Posted by: All About Ohio | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Tysen, grow up.
Posted by: Monkey | October 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
How did Obama become a Senator?
His Chicago Machine (including the Chicago Tribune, owner of the LA Times) offed his opponent (Jack Ryan) by unsealing divorce records.
Look it up…
Posted by: Big Jim Slade | October 31, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Not too impressed with the headline, Jake. Content of the blog is fine… but the headline read like a Drudge red-ink special (which, ironically, it turned out to be).
Posted by: Andrew Kinder | October 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Guy #1: studies hard, works hard, makes a good living, saves his money, invests intelligently, and would like to pass what he has earned by the sweat of his brow to his posterity, and have a say in what charitable organizations he wants to give to.
Guy #2: Millionaire politician with members of his own family continuing to live in abject poverty, wants to take away what guy #1 has earned, and distribute as he sees fit.
Guys/Girls #3: Haven’t earned and don’t want to earn their own way, would rather take from Guy #1 what he’s worked hard for.
Barak Obama would have us believe that it’s Guy #1 who’s greedy. Personally, I think he’s got the shoe on the wrong foot. Seeing as he’s Guy #2, one shoe ought to go on his foot, and Guys/Girls #3, who want to leech off Guy #1, deserve the other shoe.
Of course, that’s the democrat way, accuse their opponents of all the things they’re guilty of themselves, always reaching into someone else’s pocket to make themselves look caring and charitable. That’s greed and worse. I’d love to see Obama’s record of charitable giving (and his birth certificate, and his thesis, and his medical records, and all the other things he’s hiding from public scrutiny).
Posted by: steve | October 31, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
People will look back at this moment when Obama slighted Americans’ as “selfish” as the biggest turning point of this election.
This is not what America is, and it reveals what many suspected, but were giving him a pass on.
He is bitter like the many people he has surrounded himself with.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
I’d love to see Obama’s record of charitable giving (and his birth certificate, and his thesis, and his medical records, and all the other things he’s hiding from public scrutiny).
*jedi hand wave*
there is nothing to see here
Posted by: chuck | October 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Maria123. Thank you. I wonder how long we will be able to do this in the current climate.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Monkey-
I also work two jobs just North of Milwaukee as a psychotherapist. My 40 something wife is in college to be an art teacher after being a stained glass artist all her life. We had our 3 children in private schools until this August- we just couldn’t afford it anymore! Don’t quit man! you and I and others need to work harder to rebild America! Never give up the ship man… I can tell you love this country.
Obama- do your worst!
Posted by: dabillster | October 31, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Alright, for those of you who are in favor of redistribution of wealth, time to answer a few questions-
1) Is there going to be any accountability for the recipients of the redistributed wealth? Are these recipients going to be made to use the money wisely, such as investing in secondary education; or are these people going to be allowed to spend/waste the money as they please (for instance, by blowing the money on consumer goods)?
2) Is there a time limit for those recipients to show that they are indeed improving their lives (and hopefully improving everyone else’s as well by becoming productive citizens) before there is a cutoff of the largesse, or will these people be allowed to continue to sponge off the productive members of society?
3) Can those of us who will be expected to pay for this expect a time limit for these “progressive” policies to show positive results for society, or are we going to be condemned for eternity to fund more government programs (like Social Security) that do nothing but exacerbate the societal problems that we already have?
Posted by: Darren | October 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Red,
“Selfishness, is allowing your aunt to live in a rundown Boston slum while you party down in a multi-million dollar mansion. Selfishness is allowing your half-brother in Kenya to live in a mud hut on $12 a year”
No! Selfishness is what causes one to be incapable of understanding the compassion for fellow man that the two people you cited CHOSE. THEY CHOSE THEIR LIFESTYLES to be near others that they could help. Very similar to Obama’s choice NOT TO GO FOR THE MONEY and opt for a community organizer.
Selfishness is being too lazy to research facts while defaming another. Although maybe this last one is jealousy. Maybe its just bigotry, too.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
My only question for the American people is this, Obama wants the government to run our health care system. Can anyone name ONE thing that the government under ANY party has run efficiently and effectively? Do we really want them making decisions about something as important as our medical treatment?
Posted by: Navyvette | October 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Lbar.
The government is not the church.
That is the problem with many liberals they have replaced the church with government.
Government is not headed up by any thing other then a human.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
This was fun. See you all on November 4th, when you wake up to Obama! Let’s get ready for some change, sorry mavericks, Mc’Cain you’ve been Mc’placed! We already know how what GWB does, thanks for screwing it up for 8 years.
Posted by: Monkey | October 31, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
I’ve never seen so cocky a Presidential candidate annoucing publicly that he wants to spread the wealth. Survey shows that Republicans are actually much more generous than the Democrats. When Republicans donate, the money go the needy people. When Democrats, the money goes to extremist organizations. Democrats just play generosity with other people’s money. Look at Obama: he never helped his poor relatives. His aunt lives in a slum, his half brother lives in a hut in Africa, just two examples. Why didn’t he set an example first ?
Posted by: Haha | October 31, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
This is the biggest smoke and mirrors. The Obama plan is simple, you make more than 250K, you pay the same taxes as during the Clinton Administration… That seemed to work out for most of us. The thought that the middle class in America is out for a handout and that that stated handout is the premise of the Obama tax plan is just ridiculous. Why is it that the richest of Americans support the Obama plan and only the Fox News believers don’t? It will be a better country for all of us with Obama’s change, like him or not.
Posted by: mapsguy1955 | October 31, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Listen to all of you folks. This blog is almost laughable. It shows what America is become. What a bunch of racist bunch we are. We all sit here and talk about giving up what little scraps of money we have. And insult a man because his middle name is Hussein. Oh yeah it is arabic big deal. Barack is Hebrew. So maybe he is confused. McCain is Irish so maybe he is cathloic maybe he is Sein Fenn IRA. America truly needs to wake up. We talk Marxism on Obama when Bush NATIONALIZED Wall Street and the Banks. Well we hear the speech by bush that we have to act boldly. Just like Iraq, New Orleans, Bin Laden, he screwed up here covering his pals butts. If he acted boldly we would be throwing the thieves in jail instead of bailing them. But no The Bush Legacy is 8 years of failure.
Posted by: jim mcatee | October 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
So now we are selfish and unpatriotic if we don’t want higher taxes and income redistribution.
America is the land of opportunity, not handouts.
Maybe someone ought to tell Mr. Obama that.
Posted by: Dimsdale | October 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I do not consider myself a selfish person. In the last two years I have given approximately 10% of my income to a local family that has been struggling with Health issues resulting in a loss of income and higher than normal doctor and hospital bills. Yes, both the husband and wife work full time and both have insurance (provided through employment with the state of Indiana – it’s not very good). However, the difference between most conservatives and most liberals is not that one is selfish and the other is generous. Keep in mind that the American people, both conservative and liberal are the most generous people in the world. the difference is that a conservative considers the act of giving to be a personal decision (to whom? .. how much? .. when? etc.) not a decision to be made by the state. Whereas, the liberal considers giving to be a function of the state and therefore must take the money via taxes from one group to give to another. As a techer, I have had students who told me that obviously I wasn’t as smart as their parents because I had to go to work each day – their parents didn’t and they did just fine. This is the educational result of my students observing three or four generations of welfare recipients. To take from those who produce to give to those who refuse to produce is not in itself socialism. However, it is a characteristic of most socialistic models and ultimately fails as it provides a disincentive to work for both the productive and the nonproductive individuals in a society. It is therefore not selfishness to disagree with Senator Obama; merely a recognition of human nature.
Posted by: Norm | October 31, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
quyen: How insightful, Not !
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Obama likes to excoriate people for being selfish, but he stokes the fires of envy and jealousy. Typical left wing pandering to losers.
Posted by: Hector | October 31, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
“Greed, for lack of a better word, is good”
Alaska redistributes the oil tax to residents to the tune of $3000+. Get a life
Posted by: Gordon Gekko | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
People will look back at this moment when Obama slighted Americans’ as “selfish” as the biggest turning point of this election.
This is not what America is, and it reveals what many suspected, but were giving him a pass on.
He is bitter like the many people he has surrounded himself with.
In Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism (Basic Books),
Arthur C. Brooks finds that religious conservatives are far more charitable than secular liberals, and that those who support the idea that government should redistribute income are among the least likely to dig into their own wallets to help others.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Hey Gary Roseman: I am waiting your answer. Where have you gone?
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
You Republicans! Can you honestly sit there and say that God awful woman is worthy of being in the White House or even CLOSE to it? You think you’re educated about Obama and his plans but you are so far from the truth! You believe that he isn’t even a citizen!!!! He was friggin’ born in Hawaii. OMG! Get your information straight instead of listening to the rumours and hatemongers. All you Republicans can run on is hate and fear! You’re sooooo afraid that Obama is right AND HE IS!
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Alfred: “As reported by the Telegraph (hardly a conservative paper – very left leaning) George Obama “I leave on less than a dollar a day”
Firstly, if you’re going to quote something, get it right. I don’t think that’s a direct quote from the Telegraph. Because they know the difference between “live” and “leave”. Secondly, the article you’re referring to was the Telegraph describing what the Italian Vanity Fair claimed, and it was that that George Obama later stated was lies. Thirdly, the Telegraph did actually go and talk to George Obama themselves, and he said no such thing to them.
Here’s a direct quote from a later article from the Telegraph for you:
“George Obama has been misquoted on many right wing American websites as saying that he lives on $1 a month, an inaccuracy which has been picked up by Obama’s enemies and used as evidence that the candidate has turned his back on his family.”
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
All of you people are carrying on about the socialist Obama and how his economic plan is so wrong, but you are missing the big picture. Let us say it is a screw up, but what have we been in the last 8 years? My military pay has went up 5% in the last 4 years to support a war on terrorism that has hit our economy the hardest… not raising taxes in a specific income bracket. Come on people lets think of the greater good here, its only one presidential term. Look at civilization in the east they are laughing at us right now…besides the lower gas prices would already offset the few thousand dollars a person with a $250k would spend on higher taxes.:)
Posted by: USAF | October 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
All of you people are carrying on about the socialist Obama and how his economic plan is so wrong, but you are missing the big picture. Let us say it is a screw up, but what have we been in the last 8 years? My military pay has went up 5% in the last 4 years to support a war on terrorism that has hit our economy the hardest… not raising taxes in a specific income bracket. Come on people lets think of the greater good here, its only one presidential term. Look at civilization in the east they are laughing at us right now…besides the lower gas prices would already offset the few thousand dollars a person with a $250k would spend on higher taxes.:)
Posted by: USAF | October 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Cuervokate, How you can you think BO has the experience after only 140 days in the senate and the rest spent campaigning, when SP has been a governer for longer than your guy has been an active senator? I don’t question BO’s citizenship…I question his judgment, his experience and his policies, period. He is completely untested. His policies are untested and his judgment is faulty, proven by the people he has chosen to be mentored by and associated with.
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
We should all follow Obama’s example of giving, he made more than a million dollars and donated less that 3,000 to charity over the last several years. Instead he want to take other peoples money and give it away. His tax plan is great, instead of working hard and earning more money we can now work less and hold out our hand as those who still think they need to work hard can support us. Pretty soon I won’t have to go to work anymore, someone else can pay my bills, its the patriotic thing to do.
Posted by: Truth | October 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
OldManJaack: “His brother lives in a shack the size of a bathroom stall and gets by on a dollar a month.”
Obama’s half-brother, George: “They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.”
Sheesh. This is like shooting ducks in a gallery.
Posted by: Aengil | October 31, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
The MOST CHARITABLE nation the world has ever seen……selfish? Screw you Obama, what the hell have you given, punk?
Posted by: Ktexan | October 31, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
USAF, Thank you for your service to our country and for sacrificing so that I have the right to disagree with your endorsement of BO. :)
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Dimsdale:
We are supposedly at War ! We have ongoing military operation, even if you want to call it an occupation, in 2 countries. We have military carrying out operation in several other countries on a small scale. Now Ron Paul says we should not be doing all this and be all over the world. Unless ou accept that, they yes, you need to pay for our defense.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
If you support Obama you don’t have to worry about him being wrong on any issue, he’s has spoke both ways on basically every issue out there. Military spending last month decrease it this month increase it, Heath care 6 months ago nationalize it, last month more competing with insurance companies, taxes 6 months ago only those above 300k, then 250k now down to 150k or is it 120k?. i’m sick and tired of his pitting one group against another. Now he declares shortely there will be a total transformation in America. I don’t want a total transformation. I just want to see Gov’t accountable, taxes low to stimulate economy, positive change for insurance with health care. McCain’s got it wright.
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
steve,
No, steve. Your hypothetical (like Joe the Plumber’s story) is easily replaced by Guy#1′s real life situation.
He studied hard, worked hard, made a good living, saved his money, invested intelligently, blah, blah, blah and ends up like this in 2008:
- Student loan with higher interest
- Job loss because company insourced/outsourced foreign cheaper labor
- Wages reduced
- Banks failed, can’t find his money
- Lost 40% – 80% of retirement investments
- etc., etc.
Trickle down and tax breaks for the wealthy has not worked.
Obama/Biden 08!
“Guy #1: studies hard, works hard, makes a good living, saves his money, invests intelligently, and would like to pass what he has earned by the sweat of his brow to his posterity, and have a say in what charitable organizations he wants to give to.
Guy #2: Millionaire politician with members of his own family continuing to live in abject poverty, wants to take away what guy #1 has earned, and distribute as he sees fit.
Guys/Girls #3: Haven’t earned and don’t want to earn their own way, would rather take from Guy #1 what he’s worked hard for.
Barak Obama would have us believe that it’s Guy #1 who’s greedy. Personally, I think he’s got the shoe on the wrong foot. Seeing as he’s Guy #2, one shoe ought to go on his foot, and Guys/Girls #3, who want to leech off Guy #1, deserve the other shoe.
Of course, that’s the democrat way, accuse their opponents of all the things they’re guilty of themselves, always reaching into someone else’s pocket to make themselves look caring and charitable. That’s greed and worse. I’d love to see Obama’s record of charitable giving (and his birth certificate, and his thesis, and his medical records, and all the other things he’s hiding from public scrutiny).”
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
If I have to pay 10-20-30% of my meager nursing income to taxes then someone who makes a quarter of a million dollars a year or more can certainly do the same! THAT is what Obama supports. NO ONE who makes what I make is going to have to pay more in taxes. I’m sick of you “richies” getting by with your friggin’ tax loopholes while I struggle (having to take on a second part time job) just to make ends meet! Fair is fair!
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Just thought I would ask one more time….
My only question for the American people is this, Obama wants the government to run our health care system. Can anyone name ONE thing that the government under ANY party has run efficiently and effectively? Do we really want them making decisions about something as important as our medical treatment?
Can’t someone come up with at least one thing?
Posted by: Navyvette | October 31, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Because mapsguy1955 Obama’s Marxism is legislated mediocrity. First the money will move off shore, then the companies and the jobs will move off shore and the brain drain form all over the world that came here in the 70’s and 80’s will reverse and all our talented inventive people will be gone and those of us left here will have a lower standard of living. Get it?
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Years ago I saw a World War II film in a museum staring Donald Duck in this short. The voice told Donald it was his duty to pay his taxes in a timely manner as his civic duty in support of our effort in World War II. We also have not sold any war or defense bonds.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
How dare this man judge me as “selfish” simply because I don’t agree with his socialistic policies? I believe in helping the poor, and I do it by donating to various charitable causes and to individuals with needs. As a Christian, I believe it is our responsibility to do so. I do not, however, believe it is the government’s right to force me to do so. It is my choice. I happen to believe private charities are much better at getting help to the people than the government will ever be. If you think socialism works, you should try saying this phrase, over and over: “bread lines”. Do that until the message sinks in.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
“A lot of rich people would leave me struggling to deem their dollars “hard earned”. jozsef
I would think the same true for a lot of poor people.
Who is actually selfish, between someone who earned money,and wishes to dispense it as he pleases, and someone who did not earn it, but feels they should have it anyway?
Posted by: Tex | October 31, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
I was so angry after reading Obama’s latest rhetorical flourish stating, “I want to help out the middle class…and make sure everybody has a shot…” Doesn’t he realize HE isn’t needed for everyone to have a shot. If we are American’s we have a shot.
After reading the comments, though, I am feeling much better. American’s are really great. Most just want a chance, an opportunity. So many of us want to make it on our own. We are hopeful. If we work hard enough we believe we can achieve anything. No handouts, just a shot…and we already have that shot, even without the arrogant Mr. Obama.
Posted by: Rebecca | October 31, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
I’m on medicare and it is great. My old work plan sucked. Tell me how poor our military is (gee that’s big gov) or should we outsource that to china.
Armyvette
Posted by: Gorden Gekko | October 31, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Why on earth would I want to go to work and work all day only to turn around and give my money to the 40% of the people who do not want to work? No silver spoons here, but I believe in working for what I have I do not need the democrats telling me where to spread my wealth. The USA is freedom for American, this does not mean freedom to take my hard earned income!
A very proud republican with morals and strong Christian beliefs! Hand up…no hand outs!
Posted by: MOM | October 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
quote – It takes a lot of rich people to keep me poor.
Posted by: Ghandi | October 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Let’s go back to the 1959 Ike tax structure, OK?
Posted by: Gorden Gekko | October 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
I have multiple graduate degrees in different fields, as do many of my friends. We are women who would be expected to reject Sarah. We LOVE Sarah. She is clearly very bright, a fast study, a natural communicator, beautiful and sexy. She doesn’t just talk the feminist whine about having it all, she just does it all, and does it well. (And she has Todd.) She didn’t go to fancy schools. I did, and I will tell you that a lot of fancy school grads are not the best/brightest or people I admire. We want real change, and Sarah offers that. The snooty women who diss Sarah reveal a lot about themselves. And it’s not pretty.
Posted by: susanna | October 31, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Welfare is not and never has been the answer!
And gee, hasn’t Obama and Biden been so SELFISH with THEIR charitable donations?
Posted by: NYSmike | October 31, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
This represents exactly the kind of pass Obama gets. Whenever he makes this statement about people buying a new car or a computer, etc., they need to follow up with a question: Just how much do you plan to spread around to others so they can afford to by a new car? More than likely the lower income segment of society is not going to be able to afford a new car payment. And if you are going to give them a large benefit so they can, how much more do I have to pay?
Posted by: Becky | October 31, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Robin, Jesus criticized the tax collectors. People with wealth should distribute wealth to the poor as they see fit. It’s just that the government shouldn’t take it from the wealthy through tax collectors, the very people Jesus criticized. Bill Gates gives lots of money away to worthy causes.
Posted by: DJS | October 31, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
So called Jesus guy:
The Jesus continuously instructs us to show love even to the tax man because he is so reviled. It is a measur of our love for the Lord. Now this is love the tax man, not the taxes, but give unto Caesar.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Rules for Living:
When you reward production, you get more production.
When you penalize production, you get less production.
Understanding these two datums, what do you think we will get if we give 40% of the public who don’t pay taxes (i.e. low or no producers) a tax cut (free check in the mail)?
Selfishness is not the issue here, greed on the part of politicians who want to hold onto there power using your tax dollars is.
Posted by: Dan Sales | October 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Indeed, a half century ago, the White House hosted a GOP President — Dwight D. Eisenhower — who refused to push tax rate cuts for the high-income set. Throughout Ike’s Presidency, the top tax rate on income over $400,000 stood at 91 percent. Our current top marginal rate: 35 percent.
Posted by: Gorden Gekko | October 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Navyvette: The only thing the Government ever ran efficiently is the military; and that only when the point it in the right direction and shut the hell up and get out of the way like they did in Gulf 1.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
We own a small business, 11 employees. I am a Democrat. I do not agree with President Bush but I will say that with the tax cuts of the Bush administration, our business has had the best years in the 12 years we have owned it. I was always taught and I always taught my children this: you are judged by the company you keep – meaning it matters. I saw the RED STAR on William Ayers shirt just last week when someone was trying to get him to talk to them. My family is Democrats, my mother is 88 and for the first time in her life she is voting for a Republican president – he has not inspired all of us but frightens many of us. I listen, make up my own mind; he talks but tells me nothing, his plans are just general stuff, just talk, his associations bother me they tell me much about his beliefs and his ideas I fear Americans are going to get change but not quite the change they expected
Posted by: Nannie | October 31, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
We own a small business, 11 employees. I am a Democrat. I do not agree with President Bush but I will say that with the tax cuts of the Bush administration, our business has had the best years in the 12 years we have owned it. I was always taught and I always taught my children this: you are judged by the company you keep – meaning it matters. I saw the RED STAR on William Ayers shirt just last week when someone was trying to get him to talk to them. My family is Democrats, my mother is 88 and for the first time in her life she is voting for a Republican president – he has not inspired all of us but frightens many of us. I listen, make up my own mind; he talks but tells me nothing, his plans are just general stuff, just talk, his associations bother me they tell me much about his beliefs and his ideas I fear Americans are going to get change but not quite the change they expected
Posted by: Nannie | October 31, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”
Great. 60′s Star-Trek “Spockism” philosophy for the future. It didn’t work for Charles Manson and his moonbat-filled commune, and it won’t work for the future.
Posted by: Red | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
It’s not selfish but the freedom to give freely and generously to charities and people who we see in need. That is NOT the government’s job. Look at Europe; people don’t give charitably because they pay so much in taxes. Americans give and we don’t want to squash that giving spirit. Obama doesn’t give very much so he doesn’t understand about personal giving.
Posted by: FreeToChoose | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Charity comes from the heart, not from the theft of individual wealth. I give to my church, organizations, and individuals because I want to and I deem that giving as worthy. Government taking from my income to give to anyone is theft. It is the individuals choice, not governments mandate. Jesus asked and called on individuals to give graciously; he didn’t reach into his followers pockets and redistribute it as he saw fit.
Posted by: T-Rex | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Maria123-
PLEASE! SP has more experience! When McSame was on Meet the Press last Saturday he said SP has more executive experience than BO and JB combined! One of the reasons he gave for her “experience” was the fact her hubby works 3rd shift for an oil company!!!!! That makes her experienced! I can’t beleive McBush even allowed those words to come out of his mouth. She has NO experience, is totally unqualified, and many well know and repected Republicans do NOT back her. To have SP within one heart attack away from being president is way to frightening than having BO in the oval office.
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Why is it that Obama & Biden, who want to share other peoples money are so stingy with their own money?
Their tax returns show that they donate to charity far less than the average American does even though they can afford it much more than the average American can.
In the last 10 years Biden never gave even $1000 to charity in any year. How does a guy, making more than $300K/year, calling himself a Devout Catholic, not drop even a $20 in the collection plate each Sunday?
Obama has given more in the last 3 years but he gave far less than most Americans do prior to 2005 even though he was earning well over $200K then.
I just don’t get it.
Force other to fund the causes that they want funded but they won’t do it themselves.
Who are you calling STINGY? Look in the mirror and at you running mate Senator Obama.
Posted by: Fred | October 31, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Gorden Gekko; And your point is? Do you know what happened in the next administration (JFK) when taxes were cut? Or after Regan cut taxes after the disaster that was the Carter years?
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
I read something once but cannot remember the specifics…it told of a group of men who went out to eat lunch and they divvied up the ck according to their income. Then the restaurant owner decided to give them a discount, and after an argument about the distribution, the high earner quit eating lunch…when the bill came, they did not have enough to cover due to not having his share. If anyone out there knows this story, you can probably re-tell it better than this. It gets the point across re: unfair tax rates (taht is, unfair to the high earners).
Posted by: anyone | October 31, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Ironic. Obama wants to “redistribute” our wealth, while his own “donations” to charity have been minimal at best. He has not financially supported his poor, slum residing Aunt in Boston. His ideas for us obviously don’t ring true with his personal beliefs. Forcing someone to share is not Democracy, it’s Socialism. Obama thinks that he knows better than our Founding Fathers regarding the Constitution. He’s very arrogant.
Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
ricardo maxwell,
Yes. That is exactly what the republican’s socialist policies have done. The redistributed my hard-earned wealth to Paulson and Cox’s republican friends.
Thanks for clearing that up. That’s why republicans lost my vote.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
I have a right to be selfish with my own money. And if I want to give some of my money to the church, or the women’s homeless shelter, or to the Red Cross, or to the lady who cleans houses, I have a right to.
Absolutely, you do. It is not just a political right, it is a *moral* right. But would you go as far as to say that you have the same right NOT to do those things?
That’s the rub right there. Most of you, when you hear “selfish” you are thinking “at the expense of others”. It is clear why nobody defends that sort of conduct, and Ayn Rand certainly did not do so.
But when someone like Obama uses the term, they mean something else. They mean the idea that we have a “duty” to the less fortunate — and that if you reject this duty, you are “selfish”. That is a horse of a different color — because such a principle precludes your moral right to decide for yourself.
It is this meaning of selfishness — moral self-determination — that Obama and his ilk are attacking. If you insist on your *right* to pursue YOUR happiness, YOUR values, YOUR interests — you are being selfish.
That is what Ayn Rand’s famous book is defending. As she put it:
“The issue is not whether or not you should give a dime to a beggar, but rather if you have the right to exist without giving him that dime.”
Posted by: Seerak | October 31, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
To Gary Roseman: Does it matter to you if someone inherits his wealth or if it is earned? Read the constitution buddy. It protects an individual’s property from a mob majority. Frankly, I don’t buy into your premise. I started poor but became successful with my own business. It took courage and hard work. I realized the American dream. Not the new version of this dream which says that everyone is entitled to someone else’s property. It doesn’t end with me. Look to immigrants as proof of the American dream. They come here every day with a promise to have the opportunity to succeed. Many become successful within a generation without a hand out from the Government. Why is it that those who are two or three generation welfare recipients can never make more of them selves than the mediocre existence that the Government provides?
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
USAF i thank you as well for you service to our country and fighting for our protection here in the US of A. As a result of your heroism I truly believe that America has been safe from extreme acts of terrisom here in this country. Unfortunately there are radical groups out there that would love to see this country fail. This will not change even if your man MR. O wins in the white house. I feel Joe biden is right for once on foreign policy the fact that america will be tested if Mr O. wins will come to be.
Keep the work ethic alive and support a real American john McCain. Someone you can count on to support you in your struggle to keep our country free from terror. God Bless…
Posted by: joe | October 31, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
So Obama’s aunt lives in a housing project, and his brother lives in a one room shack in Kenya, and he has the gall to accuse those of us who object to higher taxes selfish?
Hey Obama, charity begins at home.
Posted by: tomthebuilder | October 31, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Retired Old Guy:
If you truly are old, you will remember something called tarrifs and trade policy. If I were in charge, we would go old school. Go ahead and move overseas with your jobs and facotires. When you try and sell your products or services to our rich country of 300 million consumers, I will tariff/tax you so bad, you will come crawling back. Hey, if it was good enough for the founding fathers up until the late 1970′s and China and Japan still use them, then so can we.
It will also help with our treasury. If you do not come back, I see an opportunity for some more capitalism for new factories and jobs to service 3oo million Americans. That’s a pretty good market unless you are some huge conglomerate that disrespects its own country for its charge of mamon worship. Yes, they have to do it but that is why we should be cautious.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
To the person telling us that Jesus wants to spread the wealth…I’m pretty sure Jesus wants people to give to charity because they know it’s the right thing to do. I don’t remember Jesus ever advocating a huge government overstepping their bounds in every way, forcing people to give up their hard-earned money to spend it in the most inefficient ways possible.
I also find it odd that all the people who were dumb enough to get themselves into their bad mortgages and clearly have no money sense or foresight of consequences are the same ones writing checks to this campaign that has collected WAY more than any campaign in history. Talk about wasteful spending. Why not donate that money to a soup kitchen or your local pta instead of another big government bureaucrat who will spend it on commercials and grandiose stages? And I’m not saying republicans aren’t guilty of this. It is the whole system we have going right now. Everything about our political system has grown to ridiculous.
Posted by: pat | October 31, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Robin: Do you think Jesus meant for Christians’ money to go to programs like planned parenthood, killer of more unborn babies in our nation than any other entity? Jesus, who said we are to protect “the least of these”? I’ll pick and choose where I send my money, thank you very much, and I can guarantee you I give waaaay more than BO(pre-2007)& JB combined in any given year and I make waaaay less than either one of them makes singly! Matter of fact, I give more in a month than JB gave all year and I make under $100,000 and he made over $300k.
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Selfish? Isn’t voter fraud the very definition of selfish. This election is going to be a nightmare. Thanks Obama and your selfish desire to be President. I see lawsuits in the future of this election…many lawsuits.
Posted by: patrick127 | October 31, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
You Republicans! Can you honestly sit there and say that God awful woman is worthy of being in the White House or even CLOSE to it? You think you’re educated about Obama and his plans but you are so far from the truth! You believe that he isn’t even a citizen!!!! He was born in Hawaii. OMG! Get your information straight instead of listening to the rumours and hatemongers. All you Republicans can run on is hate and fear! You’re sooooo afraid that Obama is right AND HE IS!
And you’re an expert on OBAMA how?? Oh, yeah, you get your info from the LEFT WING LIBERAL DRIVE BY MEDIA. Now that will make an expert out of anyone. If you like OBAMA’S policies so well, How about sending me a check. I make LESS that $42,000 per year. Don’t be selfish.
Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Many of you here are commenting on how much (or how little) Obama and Biden have (or have not) contributed to charities. Just how many of you really know what they have given? Where exactly are you getting your information from? I bet neither BO or JB have 7 houses! I understand it’s “your money” or “their money” but at what point in life does a person who is supposedly a giving, God fearing person say to themselves “I have so much and I’m so grateful for it. Maybe I should share what I have.” If you truly are following God then you do give. After all, you can’t take it with you!
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Navyvette,
May I ask how much you give according to the gospel you just quoted? And for what then do you do it for? If you gave, you don’t tell other people how that you gave, how to give, what to give. God bless you for your generosity towards your brothers and sisters you care so much about you tell them to shut up when you deem they are not able to point something as well as you do? What kind of loving attitude is that that you deem yourself in a better position than someone else to preach? And who ever attack Jesus in your estimation just because you said so? Talk about charity!
Posted by: xiu | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
McCain/Palin have kept pushing their argument that Obama’s economic policies are far left. Well, the “Economist”, the well-respected, conservative economic weekly, endorsed Obama yesterday.
Who’s the real centrist, folks?
Baloney! A hundred economists have said that Obama’s tax plan is bad for the economy. So what one economist might say has no more weight than any others.
Posted by: AmericanMade | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
I spread the wealth everyday. Did you people see how pretty the blue sky was, did you feel the warmth of the sun, are you enjoying the fall leaf colors.
Posted by: Jesus | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Well…does the liberal left even care what the active duty military thinks? I am still active duty after 25 years. I have been to Iraq 3 times and Afghanistan twice. I have been involved in each and every conflict since Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada. I have put this uniform on each and every day, defending the freedoms and rights that we all enjoy and take for granted CONSTANTLY. My question for all the Obama supporters is this: When this guy becomes President, who is going to wake up early in the morning, deploy to crap locations around the world and defend a Marxist, Socialist government from the evil that lurks at our door step each and every day? Will it still be this 25 year veteran with years and dedication left in his blood, or will the likes of Matt Damon and any other crap-headed leftist pick up the weapon and do the deed? America, is it time for this soldier to retire and let someone else defend a Marxist/Socialist state or are we gonna wake up? If this Obama guy is to be the next Commander in Chief, well..have fun. I have given my life defending freedon and the American Way, I will NOT defend “Distribution of Wealth” in my country.
Posted by: mtpmbell | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
CommonSense: The scripture you referred to is not really a good analogy to taxation. The money the widow put in was being given to God, not the government. If you’ll recall, Jesus also said “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s.” He was much more concerned with the latter than the former. The logic of your argument may look good on the surface but it’s an apples to oranges comparison and doesn’t quite work.
Posted by: Cynthia | October 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
OMG! I just realized that I’m wasting time talking to ditto heads that think Sarah Palin’s $150K wardrobe at taxpayer expense is justified, while a homeless vet of Vietnam war doesn’t deserve food stamps because that would be spreading the wealth — money out of their pockets to give to someone less deserving than themselves.
Go McCain/Palin/Limbaugh/Hannity. You’ve really got these people where you need them.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Maria123,
You obviously know very little about the structure of our government. We have three branches, legislative, executive and judicial. The executive branch is represented by the President at the Federal level, the Governor at the State level, and the Mayor at the local level. Hmmm… Obama? No experience. Biden? No experience. Palin? A-Ha! Get off your couch and stop drinking the Obama-ade.
Posted by: CommonSense | October 31, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Obama, has not addressed his associations with certian people of his past! I say this to all the voters who have not made up their minds who to vote for! A man that can’t tell you about his past, then how can that man possibly lead you into the future?
Posted by: Clint | October 31, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
susanna wrote:
“I have multiple graduate degrees in different fields, as do many of my friends. We are women who would be expected to reject Sarah. We LOVE Sarah. She is clearly very bright, a fast study, a natural communicator, beautiful and sexy. She doesn’t just talk the feminist whine about having it all, she just does it all, and does it well. (And she has Todd.) She didn’t go to fancy schools. I did, and I will tell you that a lot of fancy school grads are not the best/brightest or people I admire. We want real change, and Sarah offers that. The snooty women who diss Sarah reveal a lot about themselves. And it’s not pretty.”
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I am a woman with a master’s degree in business and have nothing but respect for Sarah Palin’s poise, intelligence and character. Feminists, NOW should be ashamed of themselves. They have revealed what they are really about. They are not for the empowerment of women. They are for the empowerment of liberal women. How pathetic.
Posted by: JS NYC | October 31, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
I have a possibly new idea regarding spreading wealth around….to the 40 percent who don’t pay taxes……..get a job! Then you can share your wealth too!
Posted by: Katie08 | October 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Well where it the virtue in letting the government pick your charities.. especially if it is just to get someone elected to public office. What an opportunist! The exact same way that he picked sides against his white mother by not stating that he is bi-racial .. instead of black. SHAME ON HIM!
Posted by: Sandy | October 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Well where it the virtue in letting the government pick your charities.. especially if it is just to get someone elected to public office. What an opportunist! The exact same way that he picked sides against his white mother by not stating that he is bi-racial .. instead of black. SHAME ON HIM!
Posted by: Sandy | October 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Cynthia,
I didn’t quote a scripture. Wrong person. Not sure what you’re talking about. Take care.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | October 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Sarah Palin is a feminist. She’s a smart happy woman who is successful, a wonderful caring mother, she’s funny, and she has made most of America fall in love with her. What better feminist could you want!
Posted by: Eddie | October 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
You Democrats! Can you honestly sit there and say that God awful man is worthy of being in the White House or even CLOSE to it?
That is also what we think of Obama.
He’s proven nothing
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
You complain about 150k on clothes but Obama used 700k for lighting in Germany, and thats OK?.
You need to get some fresh air.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
LBar: Did you ever hear of the Great Depression? In 1929 when the stock market crashed and the economic situation was very similar to what we are now experiencing the geniuses in the government at that time used Obama’s prescription and passed the Smoot/Halley tariffs, raised taxes and instituted increases in social spending; exactly the wrong thing to do under the circumstances. The result was the Great Depression that lasted from 1929 until WW2 brought us out of it. If you had a clue about economics perhaps you would know better. And by the way my name is not Obama, I’am not a politician and I have no need to lie about anything, not even my age
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
LBar: Did you ever hear of the Great Depression? In 1929 when the stock market crashed and the economic situation was very similar to what we are now experiencing the geniuses in the government at that time used Obama’s prescription and passed the Smoot/Halley tariffs, raised taxes and instituted increases in social spending; exactly the wrong thing to do under the circumstances. The result was the Great Depression that lasted from 1929 until WW2 brought us out of it. If you had a clue about economics perhaps you would know better. And by the way my name is not Obama, I’am not a politician and I have no need to lie about anything, not even my age
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Obama can’t make up his mind about how much a person earns to be labeled rich: from 250,000 to 200,000 and now to 150,000. Did Senators Obama and Biden voted to raise tax on people who make above 42,000 before? Don’t trust Obama and Biden’s propaganda that they will give 95% middle class a tax cut. They will raise taxes on hard working people and spend their hard earn money to create more welfair programs for those who don’t want to work. So, paying high tax is patriotic and unselfish. You can count me out. I want to keep my hard earn money. If Obama is elected, there will be million job loss becasue he is going to punish not only the wealthy people but also the small business people who are working 12-16 hours a day, 6-7 days a week. Vote Obama out!
Posted by: Erika | October 31, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Common sense, I said NOTHING about Biden’s experience, I was addressing a poster that asked how we GOPers could possibly think Palin had enough experience and I was merely asking her the same question regarding BO. Look at your response…I’m thinking anyone that thinks BO has the experience but SP does not has been drinking koolaid with a little something extra added to it!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
My dear Robin, do not presume to confuse money with selfishness. People work their fingers to the bone to earn a living and it’s evil for that devilish Taxman to redistribute it. I say, let the people be generous and give to thy neighbor with a kind heart, a very fiercely compassionate soul, and continue to be successful in work and this effort will continue to heap furter reward of my money and other benefits too many for me to list in a blog.
Posted by: Jesus | October 31, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
“Obama can’t make up his mind about how much a person earns to be labeled rich: from 250,000 to 200,000 and now to 150,000.”
Dont forget today…. Gov Richardson while stumping for Obama now has it down to $130k…
Posted by: faamecanic | October 31, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Dear Common Sense:
The Palin wardrobe was paid for by the Republican National Committee, not by the taxpayer.
Posted by: pxfagonard | October 31, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Dear Common Sense:
The Palin wardrobe was paid for by the Republican National Committee, not by the taxpayer.
Posted by: pxfagonard | October 31, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Obama’s supporters don’t care about his association with Ayers because most of them are like Ayers, and I’m sure they will encourage their children to hang around with Ayers.
Posted by: xiaobo | October 31, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
You complain about 150k on clothes but Obama used 832k to pay CORRUPT ACORN to mess everything up for many states, and that’s OK?.
You need to get some fresh air.
Posted by: Goldenboy | October 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Ladies and Gentlemen.
Boys and Girls.
Joe Biden says paying taxes is patriotic.
Obama says that not paying taxes is
selfish.
I received my education in the 50′s, 60′s and 70′s when schools taught facts not feelings.
This great nation of ours was Founded, I repeat, FOUNDED, by people who were PROTESTING TAXES.
Patriotic to pay taxes. I don’t think so.
Patriotic to protest taxes. You Betcha.
I stand beside the guys that threw tea in Boston Harbor before I agree with two liberal socialists telling me that I am selfish for wanting to keep the fruits of my labor and that I am not patriotic because I don’t agree with them.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
And you’re an expert on OBAMA how?? Oh, yeah, you get your info from the LEFT WING LIBERAL DRIVE BY MEDIA. Now that will make an expert out of anyone. If you like OBAMA’S policies so well, How about sending me a check. I make LESS that $42,000 per year. Don’t be selfish.
Tom-
First of all I gather my information about ALL candidates from a huge variety of sources. So your assumption (you know what happens when you assume) is wrong. I listen to many people and have lengthy discussions about candidates and issues. I have attended lectures, read newspapers, watched debates and watched both the DNC and RNC. My brother is a staunch Republican and was a delegate. We discuss the issues intellegently. I am neither a registered Democrat or Republican, but unafilliated. Four years ago I would have voted for Senator McCain but his continual support of Bush policies and the total lack of judgement is selecting SP for a running mate has forced me to select BO as my candidate.
I barely make more than you do and I work two jobs. Senator Obama is NOT going to increase your taxes and there are plenty of websites and other sources of information that totally support that.
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
sorry SalG…should have been directed to “anyone”…
Posted by: igor | October 31, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
GO JIM! You betcha, I’m tossing tea into the harbor with you!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
I resent being called selfish because I don’t want to pay higher taxes! My husband and I work hard for what we have, and we give time and money to charity. We each volunteer approximately 10 hours a week on charities serving children, the disabled, and animals. Guess what! If Obama gets elected and our taxes go up we will have to volunteer LESS and work MORE to pay his taxes. How does that help our community?
Posted by: Suzy | October 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
John dear, my point was that Jesus was not talking about the government, not that he wasn’t talking about selfishness. To me, comparing giving to the government to giving to God is obscene. Of course, for those of you who love big government I suppose you might equate it to giving to God – personally that’s not my worldview and I don’t think it was that of Jesus either. Everything Jesus said about helping the poor and giving was in relation to God and his ministries, not the government.
Posted by: Cynthia | October 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
With regard to Obama’s statement:
“All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore. And that’s what I’m gonna do as president of the United States of America.”
Yes .. In the 1990′s during Clinton’s administration .. the U.S. economy was booming, tons of surplus bucks, everything coming up roses. However .. let’s not forget what contributed to that famous “surplus” .. namely .. our U.S. Military. Clinton closed bases, drastically reduced military spending .. including the elimination of our U.S. Navy Tenders .. which are vitally important for refueling our Ships at Sea. Tragically .. our USS Cole did not have the luxury of depending on a nearby U.S. “Tender” .. which ultimately forced them to rely on refueling at the foreign port at Yemen. You remember “Yemen” .. yes? Sadly .. a forced decision which resulted in a horrendous attack on our USS Cole .. and the tragic loss of U.S. Navy personnel.
Ah yes .. that famous economy of the 1990′s was a real winner. Obama plans to restore it !!
All boats rise. At what cost this time ??
Posted by: Lady Jarhead | October 31, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Speaking of selfishness, why doesn’t Obama give to charity? Why does he keep saying “I am my brother’s keeper” when his brother lives in a hut in Kenya on $12 per year, and the aunt he talks about in his autobiography lives in a Boston slum without a cane to walk with? Why is Obama telling America that it has a splinter in its eye, while he is walking around with a telephone pole sticking out of his?
I realize he only made $4 million last year, but if he can’t afford to send his brother and aunt a little help he should at least put their address on the internet so other people can.
Posted by: ragnar30066 | October 31, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
I would like to point out that Christ said “give unto Cesar what is his…” you know the rest.. Cesar = Obama OR McCain.
Posted by: Naz | October 31, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Let me tell everyone who has no problem with taxing richer people to give to the poor. Its not about the money their taking. Its about 3 things. #1 taking form thowe who work hard to give to those that don’t or the lazy is wrong and ticks hard working people off. #2 Redistrubiting wealth creates less production and feeling of why work, “don’t work the gov’t will send me a check”. #3 Increasing tax burden will discourage investment and cost jobs. Please, I beg a Obama person to get in my face regarding this issue. I will intelligently make them see the light then I will still be forced to physically try to run them out of this country!!!
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
I was shocked when I saw Jake Tapper had written this. He was one of the main reasons, along with all the other liberal crap, that I stopped watching Good Morning America, which I used to watch every morning for many years. But it looks like Tapper finally tapped into a little truth – how refreshing – would that it would continue, but it won’t. It was bad enough that what used to be “the mainstream media” lied to us, but now they also lie to themselves, and our freedom is all the more fragile and threatened for it…
Laurie
Posted by: Laurie | October 31, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
From Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary
Main Entry:
so•cial•ism
Pronunciation:
\ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function:
noun
Date:
1837
1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done.
you tell me
Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I agree with Sarah Palin. Independent thought is anti-American.
Posted by: Andreas Bonerro | October 31, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
I used to be all worried about my tax burden too. I still am but then I started truly thinking about it. In Sweden, a democracy and truly more socialistic country, David Cay Johnston said most people there own a boat. He asked a lot of bus drivers. The bus drivers have 2 homes, at least one free and clear. One in town and one in the country. They do not go bankrupt due to medical cost and have retirements good enough to live off of. They are better traveled then most Americans. How many Americans at a bus drivers salary can say this ?
Average workers pay 40- 45% in taxes( it is too heavy at the upper end though). Now, when you add up our FICA, Medicare, and state taxes( most states have them), we barely get squat and that adds up to 35 – 40 %. Then when you add-in the money to get medical care and retirement cost and the cost of education( college and trade school are virtually free to Swedes),objectively you can she which working man comes out ahead. It ain’t US !
We can still reject that and I do mostly, but I also realize it is not as cut and try as I have always been told.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I am amazed at the number of times that Ayn Rand has been mentioned. Anthem should be required reading in every year K-12.
Posted by: Retired old guy | October 31, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I’m an OBAMA support and I would have a tendency to agree. People below $250,000 per year are likely to get a tax increase of some kind.
My question, in a few places now, is WHY ARE THEY CHANGING THE NUMBERS? THEY CLEARLY ARE. OBAMA in the INFOMERCIAL said $200,000 per year, without an explanation .. WHY? Biden clearly said, within the last two weeks .. $150,000. Richardson clearly said $120,000 … WHY?
Posted by: Bob Kennedy | October 31, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Wow the post below sums it all up as I would. Obama the selfish one himself calls others selfish – he fails to take care of his own. What a hypocrite.
Posted by: ragnar30066 | Oct 31, 2008 11:00:12 PM
Posted by: georgeincincy | October 31, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
ZOGBY SATURDAY: Republican John McCain has pulled back within the margin of error… McCain outpolled Obama 48% to 47% in Friday, one day, polling. He is beginning to cut into Obama’s lead among independents, is now leading among blue collar voters, has strengthened his lead among investors and among men, and is walloping Obama among NASCAR voters. Joe the Plumber may get his license after all…
Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
You anti-tax nuts act like Obama is trying to do something completely new. He is just suggesting to go back part way to what used to work. Oh the horror! I can’t believe you actually think the Bush/trickle down way works when evidence to the contrary is slapping us in the face every day! Want to take all your toys and go home? OK. No roads, no air traffic control,no defense, no clean air, no clean water, no safe food, no medical research (wait, I can personally attest that this is already gone!), no uniform legal standards, no social security no medicare …. What percentage of you is going to come out ahead like that? No infrastructure for business to succeed. You may think it sounds nice, but somebody bigger and badder than you is going to drink your milkshake!
Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Exactly how many of you bloggers make over $250,000/year? Exactly how many of you will be effected? The past eight years of “reaganomics” aka the trickle down theory DOESN’T WORK! Many of you state how much you give to charity and I truly respect and honor that. However, as a nurse I have seen several charities for cancer patients, the dying, the seniors shut their doors. Why? Because people can no longer donate money to help. Why? Because they can’t afford it due to the economy! Hello! So tell me, are the seniors supposed to go out and get jobs at the age of 80 so they can pay for their medications? Is a wheelchair bound woman supposed to attempt to get to the bus stop over a mile away so she can get to the grocery store? Some day this could be you or one of your family members, but I guess it doesn’t matter because right at this moment it isn’t you or one of your loved ones so who cares, right?
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
When people are just given assistance and have no ownership in it, there is no pride, no sense of accomplishment and no value to it. When people actually have to work for what they are given, the opposite is true…you realize the value of every dollar on your check because you know how hard you worked, you have pride in your home because you paid for it and you know what it cost you.
With too much govt assistance (not talking about disable, elderly, etc who can not work or help themselves) their is no pride, no ownership. Who cares if you break a window in govt housing? It’s not yours. who cares if you litter? It’s not your yard to keep clean. You CAN NOT just give hand outs to people. if you do, all you are doing is creating an expectancy for the next handout. and the next. I’d rather give to homeless shelters with work programs, charities that help provide daycare for single mothers so they can go out and get a job, income based housing that still requires rent so that there is a sense of pride. govt handouts only increas the dependency on govt, creating gereration after generation of people who realize they never have to work a day in their lives and still have all their needs met. No thank you! Let me decide who to give my money to!
Posted by: maria123 | October 31, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Some of you seem hung up on Obama’s different tax figures. First, the 42K figure is a total distortion McCain keeps lying about that has nothing to do with his tax plan.
The difference between the 250K and 150K is if you make under 250K, you will have no increase in taxes. if you make less than 150K, you will have a decrease in taxes. These are for working taxpayers – not people on welfare.
Now, if you prefer paying higher taxes so that the wealthy, and large corporations don’t lose some of their tax breaks and loopholes, then that’s your business. We all know it doesn’t really trickle down. The middle class is disappearing while the wealthy get wealthier. BUT once we are sucked dry, who supports everyone? With a healthy middle class and growing lower income households, the whole economy thrives and all classes thrive.
Tax calculator:
http://taxcut.barackobama.com/
Posted by: Jackie | October 31, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
In 2006, the Obama’s reduced their income by $152,000 by using itemized deductions. Had they not done that they would have paid over $50,000 more in taxes to the goverment.
Remember, itemized deductions are optional.
If Obama believes that spreading the wealth is a priority and avoiding taxes is selfish, why did he reduce his income to avoid paying more in taxes?
I think we should be allowed to reduce our income using deductions to save more of what we earn, but that’s not Obama’s philosophy. Before he and the democrats, who plan to vote for him, force us to pay more taxes, why don’t they eliminate all their deductions and pay more first?
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/tvnews/nightly%20news/_tab%20boxes/obama_tax_return.pdfhttp://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/tvnews/nightly%20news/_tab%20boxes/obama_tax_return.pdf
Posted by: SAM | October 31, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
it is truly idiotic to harp on and on about how “hard earned” your money is and how you should get to keep it. Generally speaking, the more money you make the more you use the stuff the taxes provide. Look at the bankruptcy courts that protect businesses or the roads that their trucks use more than the average guy. Or the financial system that is . . . backed up by the government with yes taxes. Witness the bailout. Isn’t it amazing how often the profits get privatized (by the don’t tax my hard work crowd) while the losses get socialized (by the same lovely hypocritical crowd). what a convenient ideology! I wish I had principles that were that flexible.
Posted by: A | October 31, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Yes, oil companies are making billions in profits, but are also paying almost half in federal and state income taxes. Further, millions of Americans own their stocks and receive dividend checks! Obama will eliminate these tax revenues and eliminate dividend checks to hard working Americans and senior citizens that have invested into these American companies. Obama’s economic policies would indeed re-distribute the wealth to many (not all) who are only looking to Obama for a government handout! Our government already has proven programs for those in need…Medicaid, food stamp programs, job programs, free food programs, cheaper housing for the less fortunate, etc. Obama is not in tune with America and our values…spent too much time with terrorists, racist, socialists and various known radicals! Obama is “SO Wrong” for our great country…WAKE UP VOTERS! P.S. Obama and his political agenda of government control of Americans would make our Founding Fathers roll over in their graves!
Posted by: TRS | October 31, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
When you see CHANGE, think CHANCE.
Do you really want to take a chance on
someone with little or no experience
(NO EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE), extreme
leftist leanings, dubious associates who
wants to “share the wealth” driving more
firms overseas and putting Americans out
of work. America can’t take that CHANCE!
Posted by: Olaf | October 31, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
One of the elements of this debate that bothers me .. is that no one talks about the cost re-distributing the wealth.
There is a lot of talk about how other countries like Sweden do it .. Or about getting even with the rich guy who is not working for it .. Or the evil oil baron .. Or the Wall Street speculator.
But what I really see is a bunch of government types who are inefficient, ethically questionable, fiscally irresponsible and yet with better benefits and retirement than I … telling me that I need to pay more to them (aka the System) and that I should trust them. Right now … I am kind of thin on trust.
Posted by: craig | October 31, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Why don’t you Obama people stop throwing out red herrings.
Yes, other presidents have taxed people.
Yes, most people want to help those THAT NEED HELP.
But Obama is the first one to come along and blatantly suggest actually taking money above and beyond what is needed for roads and infrastructure and the military, etc., and GIVING IT TO PEOPLE AS CASH MONEY to people who have nnot earned it!
And here is a clue for you dolts that keep saying Obama is “going to take us back to the tax rates of Reagan:” Bush’s tax cuts were MORE THAN Reagans. For everybody.
The intelligent among us realize that when you let a tax cut expire your taxes go back up.
Don’t think so? Try not taking your blood pressure prescription and see if you BP stays low.
Posted by: lweaton | October 31, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Just like the Democrats would try to shame anyone who would DARE to criticize Barack Obama’s policies by calling that person “racist”, now Obama is trying to shame anyone who dares to disagree with his tax policies by labelling that person “selfish”. Sorry, Senator, not buying it.
And don’t try to throw the Bible at me, either. Jesus told us to be generous with OUR OWN money, time, and possessions, not someone else’s. Liberal Democrats just LOVE to be generous with someone else’s money, and then smugly pat themselves on the back.
It is NOT “sharing” when the government uses the police power of the State to confiscate one person’s hard-earned money, just to give it to someone else. There is nothing in the Bible that tells us we have to do that. In fact, I believe Jesus would call that theft, oppression, and coercion.
Besides, who died and made Barack Obama the arbiter of what’s “fair”? How does he know how much of our paychecks we “need”? What collossal ARROGANCE!
Tito the Builder has it exactly right: These people tax one group to give CRUMBS to another one, while taking away their ability to go for the American Dream. It’s a means for oppression, for holding people down and keeping them in a kind of slavery, all the while masquerading as “kindness”, “fairness”, and “sharing”.
Cuba got “change” in 1959. Be careful what you wish for.
Posted by: Brenda | October 31, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
The absolute arrogance of Obama is stunning. “Selfish” if I want to keep my mney and not have the government confiscate it? The government gets plenty as it is. It’s high time we have a president who knows how to cut spending and pork and that’s certainly not Obama. McCain is the best chance we have of restoring fiscal sanity to the government. God knows Bush didn’t and Obama only knows how to spend.
Posted by: Brian | October 31, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
The response by Ktexan (10:16 pm) is typical of a lot of those in the socialist party when confronted by information they don’t like. Throw out a bald-faced lie and follow it with a snide comment or two, then pat yourself on the back for being so “brilliant”. Well, facts are facts and you should check yours before posting comments. You may not like the fact that Obama is a candidate who talks the talk about being his brother’s keeper, but he certainly doesn’t walk the walk. And if he manages to get elected you will find that he treats his other promises similarly – empty words followed by no action. The man has no accomplishments and no experience. I don’t think that even he believes the pack of lies he’s putting out.
Posted by: OldManJaack | October 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
There are very few true socialistic countries. Most economies are mixed. Most of Europe is further down the socialism scale then we will ever be but they do not ownn the means of production in any major way. BTW, they seem to have a lot of pride in their country despite their bend. Their cities,streets, and infrastructure are in better shape than ours and much cleaner.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Obama is a liar.
Unfortunately a lot of people like being lied to, and believe everyone lies.
Elect him and you deserve what you get.
Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Mark-
Sorry to tell you your quotes from Zogby don’t cut it (ZOGBY SATURDAY: Republican John McCain has pulled back within the margin of error… McCain outpolled Obama 48% to 47% in Friday, one day, polling. He is beginning to cut into Obama’s lead among independents, is now leading among blue collar voters, has strengthened his lead among investors and among men, and is walloping Obama among NASCAR voters. Joe the Plumber may get his license after all…). Check out http://www.politico.com and http://www.fivethirtyeight.com. Your man McSame is losing! So desperate!
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
In thinking about what the Bible says as far as “shairing the wealth” , consider the parable of the stewards who were given 1, 5, and 10 talents respectively by the Master to invest/ work with. When the Master returned the steward with the 5 and with the 10 had used them as the Mater had intended and gained back another 5 and 10 while the one who was given the least ( the one talent ) did NOT use his but instead hid it and only had the single one to show at the Master’s return. The Master rewarded the 2 who had earned the the 5 and 10 and even took the one from the wicked lazy servant and gave it to the one with 10, TOTALLY against the “sharing the wealth” philosophy of OB
Posted by: Mike M | October 31, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Let’s see….I’m selfish for wanting to keep my hard earned money? And yet, Obama did selfish auctioning of seats for his next rally? I think there’s some conflict of interest there!! Don’t you? Obama said “pay X amount and maybe you’re number will be pulled to sit in the front row”? PATHETIC!!! Who is is sane here? Wouldn’t McCain be crucified if he did this???????
Posted by: Beth | October 31, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Whith the backgroung Obama has he couldnt get in the whitehouse for a wedding but they let him run for president Amazing only in the USA.
Posted by: arlie | October 31, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
“And Alaska we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.”
Sarah Palin – a socialist, worthy of Putin and Saudis.
Posted by: Greg | October 31, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
A politician is someone who borrows $20 from you to take you out to lunch, expects you to say thank you, then takes the meal as a tax deduction.
Sounds like obama to me, except he’s not borrowing the $20, he’s taking it.
Posted by: jupco | October 31, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Again, during World War II, what do you think even most conservaties would have said to you if you said you did not want to pay your taxes or pay much less ? This would especially be the case if you were not in uniform.
Even Donald Duck made a short about paying them !
There has to be collective rules about our taxes, not just a handful of individuals deciding to send in more.
You could not count on anything.
Posted by: LBar | October 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Obama is a liar?!?! Care to back that statement up with some intelligent information/statistics/documentation? I didn’t think so. You keep trying to give reasons why Obama shouldn’t be president but there is one thing you’re failing to do. That one thing is give me valid reasons why McCain and Palin should be Pres/VP. Can you do that without using hate, fear, anger, misinformation?
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Tiger Woods I know you worked hard to get where you are and want to beat Jacks record of winning 18 majors. But thats not fair to guy behind you spread the green jackets Tiger sorry no more grand slams. Hey under Obama the Lions will win the super bowl.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 31, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
And who was Ayn Rand’s most powerful disciple? Why, it was Alan Greenspan. The man who failed to foresee the global economic meltdown. The collapse of Wall St has much to do with Greenspan’s encouragement of irrationally exuberant selfishness. I’d also point out that Senator Dole might want to do an ad about Ayn Rand since she thought it was Capitalism that should be Godless.
Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Yes, our children have to attend college to attain the level of knowledge that was routinely delivered in high school 50 years ago. The elementary and secondary education is conducted by successive generations of failed students who dumb down the product when the torch is passed. The primary teaching method involves plugging in a video and sitting down. Something esoteric like “An Inconvenient Truth” or other pieces of indoctrination. In between they promote their leftist choices for political leadership. Absent is any attempt to really promote critical thinking or independence. This will all serve Obama well when he’s done with the 1st Amendment and starts to work on the rest of them.
Posted by: Czechbikr | October 31, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Change is somthing you cannot avoid but if complaining helps shoot the lips off till you’re satisfied. Mc Cain and Obmam are the same if you look at them from a tax and spend point of view. Both of them will tax Americans and both of them will spend tax dollars. Some of the stuff they sign off on they won’t like but that is politics as usual. Both candidates offer hope and stike fear. Time for change…well you can not stop either..time or change
Posted by: darren | October 31, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
LBar, go ahead and pay more taxes, who’s stopping you. You just want us to pay more so you don’t have to. Be a leader, pay triple taxes then get back to us.
Posted by: Eddie | October 31, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
All boats rising… Is that generally a result of rain trickling down? That’s darn close to trickle-down economics.
Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
There’s an old Washington saying: “Don’t tax me, don’t tax thee, tax the guy behind the tree.”
Translation? Nobody likes to pay taxes. But I’ll tell ya folks, I’m old enough to remember when Americans truly believed that paying their fare share of taxes was a patriotic act. Absolutely true. Cheating on taxes was considered a really dastardly thing to do. And that was when the percent tax on the income of wealthy earners was a great deal higher than it is now. It was also a time when clever tax accountants had not yet figured out how to keep wealthy people from paying much of anything to the hated tax man. Now, most people believe that, if you DON’T cheat on your taxes, you’re just stupid. This is a very different time.
Of course, the older, more patriotic time I’m talking about was closer to the Depression and World War II; when our nation had a strong sense of purpose — a feeling of shared sacrifice to the cause of making America great. Many who were around back then are gone now. I feel they would be appalled if they read this article and many of these posts.
There is an overall sense here, I believe, that the U.S. Government takes our tax dollars and hands them over to a bunch of slackers who don’t deserve anything. Not really. The truth is that most of our tax dollars go to defending our country and keeping us safe from harm. The next highest amount goes to people who are retired through the Social Security system (which they have paid into their entire working lives), or Medicare payments (which they have also contributed to), and which most elderly people could not live without. Should we just let these people expire?
The so-called “Safety Net” programs: the earned income tax credit, child tax credits, unemployment insurance, food stamp and school lunch programs, help for abused and neglected children — is 9% of the Federal budget. Nine percent. Roughly the same as the cost of servicing our national debt. By the way, a debt that the modern culture of borrowing from the future has created. Our children will not thank us for this. We borrowed money to pay for a lot of McMansions, flat screen tv’s, and SUV’s — now we are going to have to pay that money back. Another issue.
This issue is that, according to the census bureau, in the last recording period the “Safety Net” programs helped lift 12.6 million people out of poverty, and reduced the depth of poverty for more than 20.4 million people. Isn’t that worth the money?
If you don’t feel that is worth your money, you can take comfort in the fact that only 9 cents out of every tax dollar you pay goes to help the poor. The rest is for the Defense Department, the FBI, roads, veteran benefits, medical research, education, Social Security, Medicare, etc.
Who is going to pay for all this? Bad news, my friends. The guy behind the tree doesn’t exist. We’re going to have to pay for it. The rich AND the middle class.
The only debate is, what is fair? Mr. Bush felt that wealthy people should pay less. Mr. Obama feels the rich should pay more, and the middle class less. How much more and less? The difference is minor.
Redistribution? Spread the wealth around? Of course. We do it every day. We’ve done it for a long, long, time in this country. We take money from civilians and redistribute it to soldiers. It’s hardly socialism. Socialism is where the government owns, runs, and plans the nation state’s economic assets. Even if the Democrats get 100 seats in the Senate, this is never going to happen in the U.S.
Everybody has to pay, folks. Getting all exercised about taxes is a little bit like railing against death. You can do it, but it’s not going be of any use.
Posted by: JP | October 31, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Norm in Indiana and retired Old Guy I’m Norm in Alaska. I can relate to what you have said. I am now 61 years old and ready to retire. I have worked for the same outfit for 23 years and my wife and my retirement has taken a $80,000.00 hit due to the stock market.Is Mr. Obama going to help replace that so my wife and I can retire instead of working for another 2 or 3 years because of our loss? I don’t think so. We have always work for what we have gotten. When we had lean times (due to jobs shutting down) we both worked odd jobs to keep our family going. Any Federal or State programs we applied for were turned down because we made “just a little to much to be eligable”. But we always managed to pay our bills and just cut back when needed. My father, God bless him, raised 6 of us kids and always told us “no one owes us a living and we are never going to get anything for free”. I am not against government programs I just don’t think they should be fee. I have always helped someone who has helped themselves when trying to get a head. That is what has made this country great. Why are so many people trying to get into this country? It is still the land of opportunity if you want to work for it. I have worked for it all my life and now I would like to enjoy some of the fruits of our labor, not have the government tell me how much I should pay to support someone else. Who is going to help us if we should loose most of our retirement but not enough to be eligble for anything.
Posted by: Norm | October 31, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Obama is full of himself. I wish somebody would ask him if he itemizes his taxes or if he takes the standard deduction resulting in him paying more taxes. The answer is obvious.
Posted by: Ironcross | October 31, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Oh Lord won’t you buy me a color tv?
Oh Lord won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz
My friends all drive Porches
I must make amends.
Most of the posters here seem to gloss
over the fact that we own this country and our taxes pay for it. So why shouldnt there be a little fairness in the way taxes are assessed?
Posted by: MarilynSanAntone | October 31, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
I just voted for John McCain! Man, it feels good to exercise my freedom to vote for a real leader!
Posted by: James | October 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
The main VALID reason why McCain should be president is so Obama won’t be.
Posted by: lweaton | October 31, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
I believe Ronald Regan talked about a number of actors/actresses who just stopped work for the year when their withholding reached a certain point, dollar wise.
(Not practical for most, as to the others … quit whining and go fishin’..)
If I remember the few philosophy lectures I didn’t sleep through, correctly, wouldn’t the US Government have to nationalize all private means of production before the
“redistribution” of wealth could occur?
(I believe that was Marx’s supposition.)
Regardless of who gets sworn in, our economy is probably “fried” for the next couple of years anyway…
Posted by: pete | October 31, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
News flash JazyKat! The middle class has nearly all but vanished under the current regime! HELLO! In just a few short days this will all be over and President Obama will have to deal with the crap that has been created by the worst president in the United States-George W. Bush!
President Barack Obama our hope, the salvation of this country. Haha, Republicans are just so scared because their great hope, W., turned out to be so worthless. What a HUGE joke this man is and now you want to replace him with the same?!? OMG!
Posted by: cuervokate | October 31, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
We should raise taxes on everyone who wants taxes to be raised.
In fact, the U.S. Treasury gladly accepts monies sent to it without question. Let these people lead the way. Anyone need the address?
Posted by: Gregg | November 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Newsflash yourself: Gas was $2.10 the day Pelosi took over the country and the economy was humming along just fine — until Barney Frank and his boy friend decided Freddie Mack and Fannie Mae needed to give houses to people who couldn’t afford them so the DNC could get some votes in 2008.
I’m not saying it was PERFECT, but it was still better than it had been under Bill Clinton.
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
In 2001 i Obama said, on tape, that he wanted the courts to redistribute the wealth to achieve social justice. That my friends is socialism. Obama is a socialist, which is anti-american. Just go to and do a search for obama and socialism. listen to him say it. Case closed.
Posted by: fourtunato | November 1, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
To the person who keeps saying OMG! and attacking people who do not share your views by calling them names, GROW UP!! Calling names is so juvenile. I hope if you have children you are teaching them that name calling is wrong and never solves anything. In fact, it just makes you look unsecure in your stance. Perhaps, you know you can’t back up your opinions with facts and therefore, you have to turn to name calling.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Hey cuervokate – look around, go to the mails, see what people are driving, see what they are buying at Best Buy. The unemployment level is not excessive.
The only ones suffering in this ‘credit crisis’ are the subprime borrowers, and most of that is due to government intervention.
How many TV’s do you have? How about an iPod, and iPhone? Obviously, you have a computer with internet access.
I think doest protest to much.
Posted by: Buzzard | November 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
A question for you all: what will happen if Obama is elected and, rather than have their income confiscated, all the 1964, 1965 boomers (the single largest and biggest earning group of boomers — the very people who are the most productive earnings ever to live) decide to retire and collect their Social Security and Medicare; remember Obama has promised that nobody 62 and over will have to pay taxes on $50,000 of income.
What will Obama do then, when his biggest source of tax dollars doesn’t pay taxes anymore?
Will he come for more from the “middle class?”
Or maybe he’ll simply tell them they can’t retire yet, that they’re selfish to want to do so?
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Cuervokate,
Here’s some facts- Sarah Palin is the Governor of Alaska, which is the biggest state of the Union in terms of land. She was elected in November 2006, and was running the state up until selected for VP candidate in August, 2008.
Before that, she was mayor of Wasilla from 1996 to 2002.
Given that amount of legitimate executive level experience, what makes her “totally unqualified” to succeed mcCain if, God forbid, he should die while in office?
John McCain also has executive level experience as the Commanding Officer of a Navy training squadron.
Now, please explain to us the legitimate executive level experience that Obama (or Biden, for that matter) has? Governor Palin was running Alaska as it’s chief executive for a longer period of time than Obama spent in the Senate before he embarked on his Presidential campaign. Joe Biden has spent decades in the Senate. But, being a Senator is NOT an executive level job. So, again, please explain to us how two members of the Club of 100, with no executive level decision making experience between them, are more qualified to run this country than a fellow Senator who actually did work in an executive level job with the US Navy (who, BTW, has a running mate with more DOCUMENTED executive level experience than all three combined)?
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
lwheaton-
You are sadly mistaken. Gas prices have skyrocketed not under Pelosi but under the infamous W. That, my dear, is a well known fact. What shocks me is that people honestly thought W. would do something about the high cost of gas. Where do you think he gets his $$$ from? OIL! Why do you think we’re in Iraq? OIL! Now we’re staying in Iraq not because of democracy but because of politics. Should our soldiers continually be in harm’s way because of politics?
Posted by: cuervokate | November 1, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
“What Obama wants to restore is human decency and compassion for others. ”
What TRIPE!
You actually think by having Government MANDATING “human decency and compassion for others” is workable?
Mandating it only makes it more onerous. Human decency and compassion come from the individuals heart, NOT from a BIG Government mandate.
What a buffoon.
Posted by: RoBoTech | November 1, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
“I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.”
– Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
I wonder how many people who complain about taxes will also be the first ones to complain when services that the government provides for us ALL disappear?
I volunteered at the St. Anthony’s center in San Francisco, a faith-run soup kitchen for the homeless and poor. Every weekend I’d see poor, sick people, many of them with mental illnesses.
And how did they end up homeless? The director said when Ronald Reagan cut government budgets, all the state mental hospitals closed and put these poor sick folk on the street.
That’s ‘compassionate conservatism,’ folks. Blame government, cut services, and then ignore the consequences.
Not saying that the government ought to run everything, and not saying that government does a great job, but there are problems in society, yes, problems, that SOMEBODY has to fix; and if not government, then who’s gonna do it?
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
The best thing my government ever did for me was to turn me down when I asked for help with assistance with daycare. My husband was a PFC in the Corps, and he made $12 a month too much. At that point in time, I decided that I never wanted anything handed to me. Since that time my husband and I have worked very hard to get out of poverty. I worked 3 jobs to help send my husband to school. That’s life, you should have to work for the things you want. You shouldn’t expect others to give them to you.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
latest from the New York Times
Obama misspoke about the $250,000.00 tax for the Rich. There was one too many Zeroes added to it the new Number is now $25,000.00. and Joe Biden has comfirm this on CNN.
Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
BTW Cuervokate, one other fact I forgot to mention- the people of Alaska LOVE Sarah Palin. She has regularly gotten performance approval ratings in excess of 80%. I know this from speaking, on a regular basis, with my niece who lives in Anchorage (and has since 2004).
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
I have one tv (which is 10 years old, not HD, and weighs about 165 pounds), NO ipod, and NO iphone. I am a nurse who takes care of cancer patients daily and has to work a second job on the weekends just to make ends meet. My car is 7 years old with over 87,000 miles on it. Yeah baby I’m living the high life! You got me there!
Posted by: cuervokate | November 1, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I have served my country since 1985. First In the marines and now in the army. Anyone blaming all of the economy problems solely on George Bush is naive. Who enacted NAFTA? Bill Clinton. What does NAFTA encourage? Businesses to move out of the U.S. This has cost this nation millions of jobs in the manufacturing sector. Wake up and smell the coffee folks. No Jobs= No Money= Bills not getting paid. We have went from being an industrial giant to a nation that imports almost all it’s manufactured goods. Voting for Obama is going to fix this how? Quit lining up for a handout and go out and find a better job if you need more money.
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I think the biggest point missed about the upper class and their share of taxes is that they have an unfair share of deductions and/or loop holes. Maybe what is needed is a tax dependent on wages or earnings with a rising scale — a millionaire should give more than someone earning $40,000 or less — and health care should be on the same type scale — it should not cost someone earning $40,000, $10,000 a year for deductibles and the famous “doughnut hole” and the rich guy get away with the same deductions.
By the way, Sara Palin does not represent the women I know! Her “down home” views are not the same views I grew up with in rural Illinois — and I knew no woman worth her “salt” that shot down an animal from a plane! She is not my “type of female” and her bargain shopping pales in comparison to mine or some of my friends!
Thanks.
Posted by: Marge | November 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Quit whining so much about the rate and Obama didn’t say anything about taxing anyone except those that make over 250,000 annually which is 1% of the population excluding everyone on this board because if you were making over 250k then you wouldn’t waste you’re time on this thing. If they do decide to tax me more, so be it as long the government uses the money for public services like access to health care for everyone and affordable education. I am so sick of all the whiners in this country who don’t realize the importance of a government that is not bankrupt and taxes. If you don’t like taxes then don’t call the police next time because that’s socially paid for by everyone, don’t flush the toilet because that is collectively paid for, burn your trash because trash collection is socially paid for, and don’t send your kid to public schools or universities because they are also socially paid for.
Everyone who says that Obama is a socialist should first look at what the Bush administration with the Repubs have done to this country. The government now owns most of the mortgages in the country, the banking sector, insurance sector, and soon the auto sector. And Obama is a socialist? okay, i got it now.
Shut up and pay up!
Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
How exactly are we in Irag for OIL? We haven’t taken a single penny of the money that oil has generated in Iraq. Get your facts straight before you start spewing rehtoric.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
I am Rich enough and not at all selfish. I allready pay more taxes than you, I give to charity, I support many things. Of course I save but Wether I had $100 or 1 Million I slave and work as hard and likely harder than you. Money takes commitment and hard work. So if you want to learn how to have and keep money you first have to get off your lazy you know what and work for it, work to keep it, and in a Palin -Christian way give back some of the abundance when there is surplus. I hate the idea of food stamps Obama. Most people given a choice would like a job…well I can provide jobs because I know how to use money. If you give it all away and it is not used well by knowledgeable people to create wealth you will give all the money away and bankrupt the USA because you will run out of money and so will the rich people who’s extra money you have taken away to give someone a foodstamp or a free ride. Motivation is the Key and pride. You seem to think people are like dogs who want our scraps.
Posted by: CaRainbow | November 1, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
Oooppp I forgot.. My family members and relative are 153 people and we will vote McCain/Palin/08 (Virginia).
I don’t like to see my State turned Blue.
Posted by: beatrice | November 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Let me get this straight.
Obama is a socialist because he wants to… repeal Bush’s tax cuts to the very top? Tax rates on the rich are the LOWEST they’ve been in 50 years. What good have those tax cuts done? I challenge ANYONE to name one good thing that’s come from giving away billions of dollars to corporations and those ‘elites’ who are making the most money…
Another point: My parents were born, raised, and live in a socialist country. Y’all who’ve never lived outside the states don’t even KNOW what socialism is. How can you accuse someone of socialism when you don’t even know the meaning of the word?
What ignorance.
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
“Every weekend I’d see poor, sick people, many of them with mental illnesses.
And how did they end up homeless?”
Reagan? Are you absolutely sure that left wing politicians didn’t get left wing Courts to declare mental patients illegally incarcerated in mental institutions? This certainly was the case up in Canada. Then when the homeless numbers rose, the same people who were victorious in “freeing” the “mental health survivors” were blaming cuts in spending in mental health. OF COURSE they cut mental health: all the “prisoners” were “free” to do all they were capable of doing on their own: suffering through impossible days and nights in whatever ways they could. And that is the story of socialism: everyone lives happily ever after… but only in theory.
Posted by: Al Kanadi | November 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
All of you hard core republicans don’t even have a leg to stand on! When well respected members of the GOP i.e. Colin Powell and Captains of industry i.e. Dr. Eric E. Schmidt (for those of you who don’t know he is the CEO and Chairman of Google) They are in full support of Obama there is a clear message there. Vote Obama!!
Now I can see the allure of McCain. Hell any one can unless they were brainwashed into loving Bush, But honestly McCain is just a smarter, older, and more out of touch Bush. I don’t believe that McCain will hurt this country the way Bush has, but I do believe that if he is elected that in 2012 the middle and lower class will be pulling ourselves out of a depression during the election and the GOP will fall to the way side forever, because people will have lost their faith in the Republican party.
As much as I hate to say it, the USA needs republicans to keep the balance just as much as it needs the democrats. The GOP should concede this race and go back to the drawing board so that in 2012 they can represent a united front instead of the dissension and mistrust that is in plain sight of the voting public.
Republicans vote for Obama and send a message to the GOP to fix their problems before they come back to the table in 2012.
By the way all of you republicans wouldn’t be getting hated on if you had elected McCain in the Primary in 2000 it would have been a landslide in that year and in 2004 for the GOP. He could have beat Gore and Kerry, but He will lose to Obama!
Posted by: Nick | November 1, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Bridges to somewhere falling down
Federal levees failing
Military under-staffed, under-armed
Many children still left behind
50 million people one major illness away from bankruptcy
But GOD FORBID someone suggest raising the income tax on 5% of the population from 36% to 39%! If that’s socialism, it’s a step in the right direction away from the fascism of Bush McCain. (Fascism is when the government strips the citizens of their rights, for the profitable benefit of private industries with close ties to that government. Sound familiar?)
Posted by: kbb | November 1, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I agree with rocky!
Obama started with 250K, then 200K now Biden “slips” with 150K and I’ll bet you $1 Million that it will go lower than 150K for a tax break! Democrats promise; Promise and then change it, Nobody will ever notice! –Dems think 90% of america is not paying attention.
Posted by: Beth | November 1, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
First of all, I pay for water and garbage pickup, so I fail to see how that is socially funded. If it is socially funded, then the companies I am sending my money to should send it back to me.
Second, Obama voted for the bail out too. Interesting that it is all being blamed on the Republicans now.
Third, the President can not make all of the decisions himself. Congress, not the President, makes the laws. Study up on your civics. Most of the time, the plans that the President send to Congress are changed so much, that they don’t even resemble the original plan by the time they get to him for signing.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
LOL, you make me laugh! Wasilla, pop less than 10,000. Alaska, pop. less than 700,000. Being mayor and then Govenor makes Palin experienced enough to run the nation? The woman can’t even answer questions without being guided and trained by her party! Again, why do you think so many Republicans are now denouncing her? It is a scary thought to have her any closer to the White House than, say, Wasilla, AK. As far as the comment about how popular SP is in AK, unless your niece has spoken with each and every Alaskan up there she certainly cannot speak for any one but herself.
Posted by: cuervokate | November 1, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Yo, Jim; you’re sadly mistaken about who closed all the mental hospitals.
That was all due to a big story Geraldo Geraldo and Roone Arlidge had on ABC — all the liberals were up in arms and forced the closure of hundred of state and private mental hospital across the country.
But facts seldom seem to matter in GOP bashing “tales,” I have noticed.
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Why should people have to pay 39% in taxes when their are people paying nothing? If you want to make it fair, how about everybody pays 30% in taxes. Let’s see who howls about taxes then.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Nick, were you giving Zell Miller the same benefit of the doubt (that you’re giving to Colin Powell and ther others) when he endorsed President Bush over Kerry in 2004?
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Mike writes: Everyone who says that Obama is a socialist should first look at what the Bush administration with the Repubs have done to this country. The government now owns most of the mortgages in the country, the banking sector, insurance sector, and soon the auto sector. And Obama is a socialist? okay, i got it now.
You do not understand the bailout package. It is a temporary solution. Obama made an obvious reference to Ayn Rand. He is telling you clearly what he is about. Maybe you should read Ayn Rand’s story and understand why the sound bite was used. It is not a conspiracy theory.
You do not have to agree with her philosophy. But Obama made a snide remark about being labeled a Socialist and used the title of a book written by Rand. It is so blatant. He might was well have said: “Yes, I am a socialist.”
Here is some info about Ayn Rand:
Rand was twelve at the time of the Russian revolution of 1917, and her family life was disrupted by the rise of the Bolshevik party. Her father’s pharmacy was confiscated by the Soviets, and the family fled to the Crimea to recover financially. Rand then returned to Saint Petersburg to attend the University of Petrograd,[5] where she majored in history and also studied philosophy,[6] discovering the literary works of Edmond Rostand, Friedrich Schiller, and Fyodor Dostoevsky as well as the philosophical works of Friedrich Nietzsche, admiring his depiction of a heroic and independent individual in Thus Spake Zarathustra. She completed a three-year program in the department of Social Pedagogy that included history, philology and law, graduating in 1924.[7]
Rand continued to write short stories and screenplays. She entered the State Institute for Cinema Arts in 1924 to study screenwriting; in late 1925, however, she was granted a visa to visit American relatives.In February 1926, she arrived in the United States at the age of 21, entering by ship through New York City, which would ultimately become her home.
Rand declared rational selfishness as a virtue. Obama doesn’t believe her. Obama is a collectivist. Marx hates selfishness.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Nick, please judge for yourself eh? My boss at the foundation, he’s been working day in and day out for these folk for years and years. If he says they’re sick, and that a lot of them used to be in hospitals, then I believe him. He’s certainly earned my respect.
As for politicians–look, politicians lie and politicians do dishonest things, and government has lots of problems.
But the proper thing to do is to FIX the problems, not to dig our heads into the sand and say ‘let’s get rid of government!’ That’s called being lazy and irresponsible.
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Wow Mike -
You obviously have never served your country like Shane has. He knows what hard work is and I admire his service very much. I would much rather have him on the government payroll than Sen. Obama. At least he has earned the money he spends!
Posted by: Laurie | November 1, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Obama’s vision of giving everybody the free opportunity to go to college or health care or getting a little extra at the end of the month is socialism and its not a novel idea. I would love for someone to tell me where in the world is this working or where in the world has this worked in the past. Even Sweden has begun to dramatically roll back their failed social programs even public education and sold all their state companies like Volvo or Saab. Maybe your thinking it works in Cuba or Italy – well it doesn’t work. Both my grandparents came from those countries and came to this one – the country Michelle Obama is not proud of – because it was in America that my grandparents found a better life not in the country that had free health care and free higher education. Socialism breeds misery and only benefits the members of the ruling estate. The great dividing line of of political philosophy is that one between limited government and the politics of the nanny state that is used to manipulate power by those in power to create a dependancy by the voters thus maintaining themselves in power. Thus I will always vote for limited government and solutions that are vested between government and the private sector. Thats why I vote for McCain and reject socialism – iregardless of the color of the messenger.
Posted by: Fernando | November 1, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Sorry Beatrice, your state’s already turned blue!
Posted by: cuervokate | November 1, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Last year my husband and I made $280,000.00. We have two employees, that we pay well, horrible and high business expenses, and we have been paying for three kids to go to college. I live in an upstairs apartment in order that I can live as cheaply as possible because, other than our retirement accounts, we have no money. In order to make more money, my husband even took a job in another state and we have been separated during the week. So I’m looking forward to Mr. Obama being elected. I plan to start taking it easy, let the government pay for the last kid to go to college, and while they’re at it, pay for the complete and total financial support for the grandbaby that my husband and I have been doing for while we were waiting for Mr. Obama to be elected. I can’t wait!!!
Posted by: KH | November 1, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Mike,
Well then you need to tell that to this kids that i outperform on physical fitness tests regularly. i am still in very good ” fighting shape” as you put it. I had to leave the reserves in 2005 after my job went to Mexico. I had to return to active duty because i lost my job, car and house. So don’t lecure me on out of touch. And I am not on desk duty in am in a line unit. During my last Iraq rotation i spent 90% of it outside the wire getting mortared rocketed and shot at. You?
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
This isn’t a game. It’s not a “contest”, and there are no PRIZES. There are only PENALTIES. I won’t even pretend to believe that critical thought is still a part of this process – I’ll simply TRY to appeal to common sense – or what fragments are left of it.
Does anyone – ANYONE – really believe that Obama is going to provide “tax relief” to “95% of Americans”? If so, do you even OWN a calculator? The government does NOT collect taxes from 95% of Americans. In fact, there are an estimated 20% who don’t pay taxes to the federal government in any fashion. We are talking about earners, not conumers. 100% of the population are consumers. It’s a fact.
How on EARTH can this man get away with promising tax relief to MORE people than who actually pay taxes. You can’t get a “rebate” on something you never paid. You can only get a “redistribution”.
We (my generation) in grammar school that the original Mayflower Compact was a complete and total failure. It guaranteed every person an equal portion of the collective. It didn’t take very long to figure out that SOME paid for ALL, and catastrophic results were iminent.
I am convinced that the only people who support this kind of “solution” are the very people who produce NOTHING.
Nobody improves by reducing another.
Posted by: Ben Stern | November 1, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
When it comes to taxes, wanting low taxes is not a sin. Selfishness isn’t inherently sinful/evil/undesirable because selfishness is what drives us to eat, breath, reproduce, etc. What is undesirable is excessive selfishness, such as cutting line, running people off the road, stealing, etc.
And we need to remember that when someone forcibly takes something from another… most of the time, the police call that theft, robbery, or burglary depending upon how it is taken. Considering that taxes are paid forcibly by unwilling masses under threat of prison or financial ruin, with that threat backed up by men with guns; what is taxation, really?
Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Cuervokate darlin’,
Being the mayor of a town of 10,000 (and Governor of 700,000) is a hell of a lot more of an accomplishment than what Obama has achieved in his career. And now he wants to be the chief executive of 300+ million? Unless you are displaying an elitist attitude that the opinions of the majority of those folks don’t count. Surely that is not the case?
My niece was quoting to me the numbers that were from the papers and the TV news programs that are on up there. You know, the old style media that is dominated by the liberals.
And, please name some of the scores of Republicans who are denouncing her. Thank you.
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Remember, the next time you want a job, ask a “middle class” person. Those with the money will be giving it to them instead of giving you a job. Obama will turn a sharp resession into another great depression. Sound familiar? It should….
Posted by: Jeff | November 1, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
I fail to understand the Obamalogic that we should be doing our patriotic duty to prescribe to his share our hard earned money with those that didn’t earn it. Since Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Murtha and Dodd never owned a real business they apparently have no comprehension of what it takes in the day to day process of owning and running a business, probably because they despise the working owner class of people that they want to take money from. They seem to be clueless that this money could be best utilized to hire and retain people as well as buy more goods, services, equipment and vehicles which are necessary to run their business. This has the expansive effect of aiding all the other businesses that are out there trying to do the same thing.
Posted by: DL13 | November 1, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
When it comes to sharing my wealth, I make the decesion NOT the damn government!
Posted by: Terry | November 1, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
So what if Shane served the country. He has no more right to tell people what they need to do to get a better job if he is willing to sit of his A*s and draw a government pension from what he terms “hardworking” Americans.
I don’t care if the Bush administration take over of companies is temporary, the point you Bush lovers are missing is that when he came into office those companies where independent and now they are owned by the state which also known as socialism whether you like it or not. Obama say spread the wealth and he’s a socialist but under Bush the government takes over companies and it’s just temporary.
The Republicans have screwed up everything in this country and McSame has been there every step of the way. When Bush came into office in 2000, the country had a surplus, the national debt was being paid down, and trade deficits were low. Now look at this country. It’s a mess but you people don’t want to admit that the Republicans and Bush have screwed up, you’re still trying to find a way to blame Obama for the problems even though he’s only been in the Senate for 4 years and McSame 26 years.
Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Get over it OBAMA is going to win plain and simple.I make over 250.0000.and i am willing to pay a little more in taxes so stop bitching.
Posted by: duque | November 1, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Cheap rehearsal of ideas masquerading as an article. Everyone knows Americans are afraid of the word ‘tax’. We must think useful services fall out of the sky. The problem is everyone wants to have them, but they begrudge the other guy’s needs and don’t want to “pay for him”.
Co-operation is near-dead in America. When it finally turns into a country where if you are financially unlucky, you die. It will be complete.
Posted by: Joe | November 1, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Barack – God only asks for 10% who do you think you are?
Posted by: Smokey | November 1, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Ben Stern!
Bravo!!
Just one fact: it’s FORTY PERCENT of the wage earners who don’t pay taxes now; If Obama gets his way, it will be almost FIFTY PERCENT that don’t pay taxes, so you can see how the responsibility shifts to those in the “so called” middle class who do pay taxes!
Four pecent pay EIGHTY PERCENT OF THE TAXES in this country, FGS!
We are very close to the point where the votes are in the hands of those that consume more than they produce.
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Jim writes:
Another point: My parents were born, raised, and live in a socialist country. Y’all who’ve never lived outside the states don’t even KNOW what socialism is. How can you accuse someone of socialism when you don’t even know the meaning of the word?
What ignorance.
————————————
How awesome your parents can now share in this countries ideals. My grandparents also left a socialist regime. Like Obama, they worked hard, improved their lives, and helped pass down their traditions to my family. Unlike Obama, they detested Socialism for what it does to the individual. It is great that Obama could go from a poor community college all the way to the door steps of the White House.
However, Obama cites Ayn Rand’s book as noted in the article for a specific reason. If you have not read the book cited, please do. You will understand why so many feel so strongly that Obama wants a bigger government, which ultimately is the Socialist ideal. Sure, the Republican Party has strayed from its original strengths of limited government, but that is due mostly to trying to reach across the aisle in compromise and some out of control spending. Think about when the Republicans controlled Congress and the White House. It is scary to think big brother is going to be at it again, but more intent on growing government than intent on allowing Americans to create their own wealth. We have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Our government should focus on that as its goal for each individual and let each individual achieve on his own merits. Selfishness, as defined by Rand, is a virtue. Obama and Marx detest her definition.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Being in the military is a real job. If you don’t believe me, I would just like to say that being in the military ask every service person who gets up at 4 and 5 in the morning to PT and be to work by 7. Most people in the military, even the ones who have been in for 20 years, are in better shape than 3/4 of the American population. The person you just called stupid has fought and protected your right to call him stupid. Again, name calling is so childish. You should be thanking him instead of bashing his choice of “job”. If people who are to “stupid”, (I would instead call them heroic and patriotic, but I guess that’s just me.), to get another job don’t defend this country, who’s going to do it? People like you who are obviously much smarter? I feel you have insulted every service person in the country.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Socialism is a good idea…..except for one small problem….WHO DECIDES THE DISTRIBUTION?????
I has NEVER worked
because of POWER and GREED.
Socialism did not make America a great country and socialism will not keep it a great country.
“To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.” — Thomas Jefferson, letter to Joseph Milligan, April 6, 1816
“A wise and frugal government… shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.” — Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801
Posted by: Mike D | November 1, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Please excuse the sentence structure in that last post, I am having issues. LOL.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Mike,
I don’t sit on my I work for a living. i have Deployed 8 times throughout my career. Panama, Desert Storm/Shield, Balkans, Iraq(twice). I am willing to sacrifice my life so you and all other americans have the right to voice your opinion. And exercise your other god-given rights any way you see fit to.
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
for Mike @ 12:55am …
Mike, please read your well-written comment once again. Think about what you know concerning the political process and check out the congressional record concerning precisely what laws were put in place and by whom that caused this crisis. You obviously have something more than just a sophomoric education.
Or maybe you just have a short memory.
Posted by: Opie | November 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Obama is selfish. He made a ton of money last month. Is he sharing any of it with McCain? How much money have Obama and Biden given to charity. They act as though they are so benevolent, yet not with their own money-just ours.
Posted by: Wagner | November 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
I’ve served in the military and have run two very successful businesses (in spite of the taxation). I’ve saved and worked hard and don’t want my wealth “Shared” by anyone but me. Selfishness is taking from someone in order to promote your own goals – as Sen. Obama wants to do. Redistribution of wealth is something that Sen. Obama clearly promotes and it is clearly socialistic. Socialism doesn’t work. Capitalism does. You will never tax a country into wealth.
Posted by: Laurie | November 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Quit whining so much about the rate and Obama didn’t say anything about taxing anyone except those that make over 250,000 annually which is 1% of the population excluding everyone on this board because if you were making over 250k then you wouldn’t waste you’re time on this thing. If they do decide to tax me more, so be it as long the government uses the money for public services like access to health care for everyone and affordable education. I am so sick of all the whiners in this country who don’t realize the importance of a government that is not bankrupt and taxes. If you don’t like taxes then don’t call the police next time because that’s socially paid for by everyone, don’t flush the toilet because that is collectively paid for, burn your trash because trash collection is socially paid for, and don’t send your kid to public schools or universities because they are also socially paid for.
Everyone who says that Obama is a socialist should first look at what the Bush administration with the Repubs have done to this country. The government now owns most of the mortgages in the country, the banking sector, insurance sector, and soon the auto sector. And Obama is a socialist? okay, i got it now.
Shut up and pay up!
Please understand the difference between city, state, and federal taxes.
Besides, it’s not the governments money to begin with. Maybe they should budget better and spend the tax money they already have better.
Posted by: Retribution | November 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
It’s not that “keeping your hard-earned tax dollars” is selfish, Jake, you apparently partisan silly person you. It’s that government does have a role, despite the “government-is-evil” myth of the GOP; it does quite a few very necessary things very well, things that people really don’t want to give up, when you ask them; and if you don’t pay for what you get, you go into debt, see. Not to mention the fact that it’s just plain dishonest to keep acting like all of this isn’t true. This something-for-nothing mentality of the Republicans is nothing but irresponsible political candy they hand out to win elections, and when they get elected in droves, they drive the economy into the ground with it. Maybe you’d like to see them prove that yet one more time; maybe seeing Reaganism fail over and over since 1980 just isn’t enough.
Or maybe you’d like to argue with Teddy Roosevelt instead:
“We grudge no man a fortune in civil life if it is honorably obtained and well used. It is not even enough that it should have been gained without doing damage to the community. We should permit it to be gained only so long as the gaining represents benefit to the community. … The really big fortune, the swollen fortune, by the mere fact of its size, acquires qualities which differentiate it in kind as well as in degree from what is possessed by men of relatively small means. Therefore, I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and … a graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, properly safeguarded against evasion, and increasing rapidly in amount with the size of the estate.”
I guess he was a socialist of Obama’s type, too.
Posted by: steve finley | November 1, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
One more time for the seemingly slow among you: we don’t object to paying taxes for things the government should provide for the good of the country.
We object to paying MORE taxes so Obama can write somebody a $500 check for a vote.
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
The bottom line is this. Those who benefit the most from this society should contribute the most back to society. Whether you are Christian or not, it is worth noting that the Bible states that to whom much is given much is expected. Why is it so hard for those of you who prosper greatly from our society to want to give back to it? There is honor in using one’s good fortune to contribute to the good of all. You have been blessed with the opportunity to make positive change in our world. Many who prosper do honor their lives and their prosperity by giving back to create a better world. Others, unfortunately, demostrate greed and selfishness and lack of gratitude for their good fortune. I think part of the problem is the conception from these people that they are entitled to all they have and that they somehow deserve credit for having it and that they are better people; not just better off. While many wealthy have earned all that they have by pulling themselves up from their own bootstraps, most wealthy people have been benefactors of good fortune. Also, many wealthy people don’t have any real understanding of the struggles of working class people. If they did, they might be more compassionate about the need for every hard-working American to earn a living wage and have a quality of life. When someone who has more than they need in great excess; CEOs who own multiple houses and live in luxury, are not willing to pay a little more in taxes to benefit our society as a whole, that is nothing short of greed and selfishness. Finally, even if the wealthy maintain an attitude of entitlement for all that they have and feel no responsibility to contribute back to the very society that has allowed them their prosperity, they ought to do so in their own defense. Where would Bill Gates be without a prospering middle class who could purchase all the PCs and accessories that made him his fortune? It is wrong to give the wealthy more tax breaks while there are so many families struggling to make ends meet in this country. McCain claims to want to “lower” everyone’s taxes, but the tax breaks he offers to working class people are a joke. Most off his taxes are going to those who already have more money than most people can even conceive of or dream of. Those tax breaks should go to those struggling families, and the wealthy will be just fine without them. The fall of Rome was preceded by a widening gap between the rich and poor, and we should learn from this historical precedent. A healthy middle class, a prosperous society at large, is in everyone’s best interest, including the wealthy.
Posted by: Caroline Haagenstad | November 1, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Mike-I appreciate your arguement regarding the mess that Bush has put this country in. However, the disrespect you show for Shane and his service in the military is really uncalled for. I too am an Obama supporter as well anti-Bush, however, I appreciate the servicemen and women who have done more than their share in the Middle East. I do understand your arguement but don’t disrespect the military.
Posted by: cuervokate | November 1, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
The Republicans are the only ones who have messed up everything in this country? Where have the Dems been? I guess they have never helped make any laws or pass any bills. I think you may be exagerating a little.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Scarily its a mere few days to the election and now, only now, are we seeing any real discussions on what Obama’s plans are or aren’t. Last night Tom Brokaw on Charlie Rose stated that for all the interviews and campaiging Obama has failed to provide much information about his plans, what his priorities are regarding finance/fiscal. Obama is great with the sales pitch – but he’s never actually followed through before this – so why expect it now?
Then there is very disturbing story about how his campaign has taken in millions in unknown, untraceable prepaid cards with false name, or stolen identities. And that they had to lower their security on purpose in order to process these cards. So who’s actually funding Obama??
The more I learnn about Obama the more convince I become that he isn’t right for this country. That his agenda isn’t going to benefit the majority of Americans. And that he has little or none of the required knowledge, abilities or experience. He is an utterly untested in all areas of government and business.
Posted by: Katy | November 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
What do you think that BO wanted to send your TAX money to UN?
He is a stupid socialist!!!!
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Selfish?
Studies of philanthropy consistently show Conservative states give far more to charity in terms of time and money than the blue states.
It’s not about charity, it’s about us deciding who gets our charitable money NOT some government bureaucrat or neophyte poser who has spent less time in the Senate than John McCain has spent in the Senate cloakroom.
You don’t deserve our money Mr Obama, you’ll only waste it.
Posted by: TJ | November 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Wow. An actual unbiased view of Obama logic on taxes. Thanks ABC. I thought all hope was lost in your many ultra liberal anchors and writers. REFRESHING.
And to the comment about “so what if he served his country”. Only a sorry, liberal marxist straight out of Animal Farm would say that about a serviceman. Then again, we are just Cart Horses to you liberals…until we march on Rome. Watch how you treat the military leftists.
Posted by: Ramey | November 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Everyone is completely over-reacting to this issue. The United States has had a progressive tax system since 1913. Yup. 1913. Obama is not inventing something completely new here. All he wants to do is repeal the Bush tax cuts which weren’t supposed to be permanent to begin with, and which have clearly hurt our country, as evinced by the fact that our national debt has DOUBLED during the 8 years Bush has been in office.
Posted by: Allie | November 1, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
It baffles me that GOP supporters cannot see the connection. The Republican party of today is not the same party it was 25 years ago. They have done absolutely nothing forthe middle class. Nothing.
—————————————-
Since 1989, my salary has quadrupled. I am not rich by any means and started off out of college in a low level salaried position. With some hard work and a decent economy, I can live comfortably. Unfortunately, I am paying too much money in taxes for the “services” as I receive in return. Of course, I live in California, where the State is Bankrupt despite the high taxes we pay as residents or homeowners. I would prefer a government that offers less services because I really do not need many of them. So I guess i am one of the lucky middle class people that think the rich should be entitled to their money. But I also think that people who choose to live off the government do not deserve it. This is still the land of opportunity. The problem is that if you want to take advantage of the opportunity, you have to work. Obama is a great example that you can come from nowhere and make it in this country. When I say nowhere, I mean he truly was lower middle or would not have attended a community college in California. The problem is, he is a power hungry socialist telling us how bad our system is, when he used the system to get to where he is now.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
What do you think that BO wanted to send your TAX money to UN?
He is a stupid socialist!!!!
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
What do you think that BO wanted to send your TAX money to UN?
He is a stupid socialist!!!!
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Norm: There’s an old Washington saying: “Don’t tax me, don’t tax thee, tax the guy behind the tree.”………..
Thank you for your knowledgable, articulate and thoughtful comment.
Posted by: Tracy | November 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Hey Allie,
Do you remember that we are fighting a major war on terror? How do you suppose we pay for that? Do you recall the government hand-out’s in Katrina aftermath? Do you remember the government pay-out’s to the 9/11 victim families? Do you?
Allie, do you remember anything of what has happened over the past 20 years?
I have two close friends that know and understand socialism first hand. They are delighted to be in THIS country. THIS United States of America. THIS freemarket system has been good for everyone. You’ve distorted the facts my friend. Please be more diligent when you post Allie.
Just checking…
Posted by: Opie | November 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Why some people (men and women) who love to trash Governor Palin? To me their vicious attacks are nothing more than jealous of her success, her intelligence and her beauty.
Posted by: beatrice | November 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the democratically controlled Congress that has the lowest approval rating of any Congress in history. How could that be when it has been only the Republicans messing everything up?
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
For those of you who are arguing that the rich have an obligation to give back to this country- submit to you that the less fortunate have JUST AS MUCH OF A DUTY to give back to this country by trying to improve their lot in life, so we can all benefit by having to pay out less in assistance. I’m not talking about those who cannot legitimately help themselves, but those who are able bodied and refuse to work. Those people have an obligation to this country to get off of their rear ends and try to improve their lot in life. There are plenty of programs out there for getting an education, job training, etc. that these people DO NOT take advantage of. If these folks are not willing to help themselves, then the rest of us should not be charged with having to provide for their existence.
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Let’s get real here and call this thing what it really is. Taxes on the richest segment of the population are at the lowest point they have been in the history of the United States. Obama is not preaching socialism by any means unless this was a socialist nation to begin with. I am not necessarily advocating anything to this extreme, but there was a time when the tax rate was 90% for anything made over a certain amount (although I do not recall the cutoff).
The point is, I do not care how hard you “work”, I find it hard to have much sympathy for individuals making literally millions of dollars per year having to pay higher taxes than the rest of society. Further, while I recognize and give credit to those that build their own businesses or run large corporations, but the honest truth is that in most cases, the actual “work” is done by employees. Again, I respect the time and effort in planing, marketing, etc, but does anyone really deserve multi-million dollar paychecks. Not in my opinion. Especially if the money is paid as a salary to top executives who do not even own the company, but are merely employees.
Further, as far as the argument that if the companies can keep the money instead of paying it in taxes is complete hogwash. Corporations will pay as little as possible and run as lean as possible to increase profits. The spread between top level executives and the “working class” has grown to more than 400 to one from about 50 to one 25 years ago.
This country is being destroyed by greed. Multi-million dollar severance packages to CEO’s of failed businesses. High level executives being paid retirement packages worth tens or even hundreds of millions, on top of the millions they have already received. If you must be a socialist to think that is rediculous while the working class struggles, then I am a socialist!
I don’t care if you spend 16 hours a day in board rooms, country clubs, and fancy business dinners, it does not compare to the people on the factory floors risking injury, disability, and even death for what are mere table scraps in comparison. Give me a break!
Posted by: Ron | November 1, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Finally the media is barely beginning to critically analyze this buffoon we call “The Messiah”.
But is it too late to stop this man who says he wants to “Fundamentally Transform” America using the ideals of his mentors: the socialism of Saul Alinsky, the self-loathing of William Ayres, the racism of Jeremiah Wright, the antisemitism and hatred of Israel by Rashid Khalidi?
This is a REAL THREAT — WAKE UP — SNAP OUT OF THE GLAMOUR bewitching you!!!
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
You all you democrats on here agree when Obama calls the constitution a flawed document or when he calls the liberties we enjoy “negative”.
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Some of you seem to be missing some very important economic principles.
When taxes are raised the economy slows; when taxes are lowered the economy grows. When the economy grows the government’s tax revenue increases. Second, as long as there are greedy and corrupt people, any centrally planned economy, whether it is socialism, nationalized programs, etc., will never work. It works against human nature, dampens the human spirit and encourages corruption, which makes its failure inevitable. Also, the bigger the government the more corrupt it is. Basically, socialist type systems and redistribution schemes just push everyone down to the “lower class”. We would all be equal at zero or close to zero, except the ruling elite and the “super rich”, empowering them to oppress the “lower class”. Capitalism takes human nature; greed, corruption and the human spirit and puts it to work for the good of everyone.
It is widely known that you never raise taxes when the economy is in crisis. Economists also agree that raising taxes caused the great depression to last as long as it did. It also caused the long period of stagflation during the ‘70s. Obama and congress want to do the very things that caused the depression; raise taxes and massively increase government spending. Obama’s economic tax and spend plan would raise taxes on the very people that will get this economy going. You cannot drag some down to pull others up. You will end up dragging everyone down. It will ensure the very people Obama thinks he is helping, the “middle-class” and below, have lower incomes, lose jobs and push many into poverty. They will lose the opportunities they had to better themselves. They will be worse off. The unemployment rate will skyrocket. There is no incentive for the economy to grow, for jobs to be created. What good is a tax cut if you lose your job and there are no jobs to replace it?
His economic plan would cause a perpetual recession or possibly a depression. In reality, Obama’s tax and spend plan will slow the economy and hurt everyone while giving him and government more power and money.
There are examples everywhere and in global history that prove this. You just have to study and don’t blindly go along with the people your bias brings you to.
Once again Obama and democrat leaders in congress accuse others of the very same practices they themselves do.
Those that ignore history, mislead and raise taxes to increase their own power and wealth are blatantly practicing selfishness.
http://kristokoff.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
I boggles the mind how some people believe that we could be at war and not have a rising deficit. How do they think the war and every thing that goes along with it have been paid for. Oh yeah, they haven’t, hence, the deficit. GEEZ!!
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Ron- You have obviously never owned a small business! Sen. Obama can tax us all he wants. We’ll just have to share the love with our customers with higher prices. I guess that’s okay because they’ll be paying less taxes so they can use their extra money to pay our higher prices.
Posted by: Laurie | November 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Hey Ron,
It must be difficult for you and Obama to live with all of that envy and jealousy.
Is that what your Messiah is peddling — ENVY?
If you want a fair tax, everyone should pay the same rate. But we don’t. The rich already pay a higher rate.
The rich also pay a greater percentage of the total bill, but that is not good enough for jealous, petty little men…
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Mr Obama served in South Chicago ,how many of those poor and church goers were able to get out of that poverty ask him and how many Jeremiah wright’s church goers are now going to high places can any one in chicago explain–none because these politicos are using the poor and downtrodden for their own benefit and they are cowards as they can not admit freely.Go McCain.
Posted by: P.Barman | November 1, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
I would give anyone the shirt off my back but I don’t need Barack Obama to rip it off of me!
Posted by: Castilyn | November 1, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Hey ABC….
You left out someone very important when you speak of “anyone can rise to the presidency”……
Mr Peanut! Truly amazing.
Posted by: Opie | November 1, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Jake Tapper: Your pro-McCain bias is pretty obvious here. You are misleading people, distorting facts, twisting what Barack Obama is saying and acting like a poor excuse for a reporter.
This is a very poor piece of work. Ayn Rand is a discredited extremist who lived in a fantasy world. Rand also despised working people, often making fun of them and their “meager” earnings. She is not a model for our country in this new century.
Shame on you for your very biased and unprofessional work.
Posted by: jimcap | November 1, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
SELFISH?!!!?!
AFTER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BAILED OUT THE MORONS ON WALL ST. & THE ASLEEP- AT- THE- SWITCH MORONS IN WASHINGTON TO THE TUNE OF 700+ BILLION DOLLARS, B.O. CALLS US SELFISH?!!!!!?
HE’S A DISGRACE TO THE HUMAN RACE!
HE’S THE BIGGEST MORON OF THEM ALL!
Posted by: Sharon | November 1, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Obama is an “Esworth Tuley”
Posted by: KB | November 1, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Ron:
The spread between top level executives and the “working class” has grown to more than 400 to one from about 50 to one 25 years ago.
————————————–
Don’t know how you define working class or if your numbers are accurate. That is a big disparity, but look at the stock market and how much it has grown. The top executives are probably overpaid, but that is to be decided by the market, not by government. Look at professional athletes – Alex Rodriguez. Should we punish him for being a better performer than the worst players or should we let the market decide how much he is worth?
The bottom 40 percent in our society pay no taxes. How many of those tried to excel in life and are victims of this cruel society vs how many accepted their lot in life and just want free stuff from the wealthy? If we keep giving out free stuff, people will stay slaves of those making the handouts. This is what Obama wants. If you are the type that sees our society as evil, I would rather be serving a Corporation, than serving Obama, because I am free to seek other employment under our system. Under Obama, the poor will always remain poor because he is going to enslave and control them by offering them free stuff, at the expense of the middle class and wealthy. What demographic is he targeting with his promises?
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
I believe the Obama family donates 1% of their yearly income. Now who is selfish? Charity begins at home. Start in your own house Mr. Obama.
Posted by: zanne | November 1, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Does their behavior follow the guidelines of the deceiver Saul Alinsky’s “rules for radicals”?
A lot of the chaff can be sifted out by determining those that are filled with hate and follow these rules. These rules that guide them can be used to determine if someone is using these tactics, if so, you know they are not truthful and you shouldn’t waste your time with them.
Obama says he is a unifier, a non-partisan. His tactics and actions say otherwise. He seems to be one of the most partisan and divisive politicians I have seen, whilst being smooth and cool at the same time. Unification by forced conformity?
I have noticed many Democrats in power use these divisive tactics, many pundits on TV and bloggers as well. It allows them to bypass rules and even the constitution. Nothing matters but the end result, so far it seems to be working. This is a serious threat to our constitution, freedom and nation.
Take a look at the way everyday Americans like “Joe the Plumber”, journalists and their spouses, Gov. Palin and others are treated by Obama, his campaign and the media. Obama’s statements about Pennsylvanians indeed many Americans, this latest “selfish” comment, the various spread the wealth around comments and many more statements from his past; the people he has surrounded himself with in the past, some of them follow the Alinksy rules; he is also the most secretive, think about how little we know about him, things he has not released that other candidates have, all these things should make everyone nervous and take a second look at Obama.
If you only watch main-stream media you would think republicans in leadership positions aren’t as intelligent as democrats. The media seem to go out of their way to report only things that make them look bad. Democrats and republicans that have talked with and/or interviewed McCain, Palin and Obama all say they are smart, intelligent people. They say Palin is sharp, quick and very personable. It seems only those that base their opinion of Palin from the media, haven’t met her or haven’t heard her speak at rallies think she is not smart and is bad for the McCain campaign. Don’t believe them. Sarah Palin is intelligent, knowledgeable, a quick study and likable. She continues to energize many across the country. She has had several great policy speeches that the media has not shown.
You would also think the election is already over. It is not! They are using the polls to mislead you. The polls are tightening, the race is very close. McCain/Palin could be ahead in some swing states. There are stats that are being withheld that show this is possible. People refusing to answer or falsely answering pollsters these may include many Hillary supporters and other democrats that are voting for McCain; an Obama and his campaign, media, hollywood and fraud backlash; all these events and others could come together and surprise all on election day.
These probably are all campaign tactics to disillusion you and suppress your vote. Stay motivated. This is possible. Turnout will be key. Turnout will also make all the fraud less of an issue. Use all this as motivation to get out and vote. Bring others with you. McCain/Palin!
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Everyone who is focused on the little change from 35% to 39% is missing the point.
If every taxpayer were actually paying their apportioned percentage, an increase on the top rate would not be a big deal. But due to all the tax credits, which phase out for taxpayers in the top bracket, many people in the lower brackets effectively pay 0% (or collect) while the top bracket pays the full 39%.
Over the long run, you simply can’t have a functioning democracy when the top few percent pay almost all the taxes. It may feel justified if you are in a lower bracket, but inevitably it will eventually lead to the breakdown of the system.
Posted by: Speaker73 | November 1, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Meanwhile:
income consumers drive iPhone growth
rom June to August 2008, the growth rate of the iPhone for individuals who earn over $100,000 was 16%. Meanwhile, the growth rate of the iPhone for individuals earning between $25,000 and $50,000 was 48%, and for individuals earning betweein $50,000 and $75,000, the growth rate was 46%.
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Everyone who is focused on the little change from 35% to 39% is missing the point.
If every taxpayer were actually paying their apportioned percentage, an increase on the top rate would not be a big deal. But due to all the tax credits, which phase out for taxpayers in the top bracket, many people in the lower brackets effectively pay 0% (or collect) while the top bracket pays the full 39%.
Over the long run, you simply can’t have a functioning democracy when the top few percent pay almost all the taxes. It may feel justified if you are in a lower bracket, but inevitably it will eventually lead to the breakdown of the system.
Posted by: Speaker73 | November 1, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Mealer Companies would have been there to promote mcCain and destroy Obama.. But our funding temporarily droppd out.
Who are we?? Google the name…
The ONLY 100% USA owned and based Auto manufacturer and so much more….
Expect the McCain 3R Economic Plan (Seemingly forgotten lately) and our hundreds of thousands of new and boosted US jobs.
McCain-Palin or we are screwed…
“WE”… MEANING ALL AMERICANS!
Open a new window and Google!!
Posted by: John Lewis Mealer | November 1, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
How could the poor, poor people between $25K to $50K afford such a frivolity as an iPhone?
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
You could start every person in this country out at the same level economically, and you would still have those individuals who are more successful. Frugal spending habits, wise investments, hard work, and a willingness to take risks will always make the difference. Should those who become successful be punished for their success and be made to pay for the wants of those who are unsuccessful. And I use the word want intentionally. Poverty in this country is no longer being described as a lack of basic needs, but as a lack of wants. I know too many people who spend way beyond their means on stuff that they don’t need, but feel that the must have. Why should the successful pay for that? Since we have pulled ourselves up out of poverty, my husband and I donate a lot of money to charities. The charities we want to help, which include, the elderly, the disabled, and the sick. I don’t feel I should have to pay more to help the people who are capable of helping themselves, but don’t.
Posted by: prostylist223 | November 1, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
“This is a very poor piece of work. Ayn Rand is a discredited extremist who lived in a fantasy world. Rand also despised working people, often making fun of them and their “meager” earnings. She is not a model for our country in this new century.”
———————————————-
Please reference how she was discredited?
From Wiki
Objectivism embraces objective reality in metaphysics, reason in epistemology, and rational egoism in ethics. In politics she was a proponent of laissez-faire capitalism and individual rights, believing that the sole function of a proper government is protection of individual rights (including property rights).
((( Sound familiar????)
She believed that individuals should choose their values and actions solely by reason. According to Rand, the individual “must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.”[19] Because she held that faith is antithetical to reason, Rand opposed religion.
Rand considered the initiation of force or fraud to be immoral, and held that government action should consist only in protecting citizens from criminal aggression (via the police), foreign aggression (via the military), and in maintaining a system of courts to decide guilt or innocence for objectively defined crimes and to resolve disputes. Her politics are generally described as minarchist and libertarian, though she did not use the first term and disavowed any connection to the second.[20]
Rand, a self-described hero-worshiper, stated in her book The Romantic Manifesto that the goal of her writing was “the projection of an ideal man.” In reference to her philosophy, Objectivism, she said: “My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”[21]
Rand was greatly influenced by Aristotle and found early inspiration in Friedrich Nietzsche (although she later firmly rejected his approach). She was vociferously opposed to some of the views of Immanuel Kant, particularly those claiming the impotence of reason. She also had an intellectual kinship with John Locke, who conceived the ideas that individuals have a right to the products of their own labor and have natural rights to life, liberty, and property,[22] and more generally with the philosophies of the Age of Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. She occasionally reported her approval of specific philosophical positions, including some of Baruch Spinoza and St. Thomas Aquinas.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Hey RogueWarrior,
I find it almost amusing how many of you elitist can only respond with insults and attacks when faced with reality. This country is full of counltess examples of corporations and “industrial visionaries” exploiting individuals who are trying hard just to make ends meet.
I am actually doing quite well for myself and my family, but I am rpoud to say I have done so with a clear conscious and without taking advantage of anyone to do so.
Do you really think someone earning $12.00 or less per hour should have to pay an “equal share”, even on a proportional basis? These poor people can barely afford to pay their bills, much less have anything left to enjoy life with.
This country has had it’s best years econimically when the wealth has been distributed more equitably. Again, let the extremely rich stay rich, no problem. However, don’t complain about having to pay higher taxes and whine that you only have twenty times what the average human being will make in thier lifetime left for yourself.
Posted by: Ron | November 1, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
I am SO insulted that Obama would call the freedom loving hard working class of America SELFISH because they want to keep their freedoms and the hard earned money that they worked for. I was raised in a VERY poor family, and without so much as a day in college started my own business and have about 10 employees right now. I’ve created jobs, including my own, and I’ve worked extremely hard to get here. And, I’m not “patriotic” and I’m “Selfish” for not wanting to pay more taxes? How am I going to create more jobs next year? Or give raises? Or implement that profit sharing plan I was going to implement in 2010? How am I going to do any of this with HIGHER taxes? This is rediculous. Obama has NO right whatsoever to call a hard working woman like me “selfish” and Biden has NO right to call me “unpatriotic” while they legislate my money away that I worked hard for. Get in reality politicians!! If you tax so much that you tax me simply to give to someone else who wont try as hard (as I started with nothing, so they can do it too), then I say that’s Property Ownership rights violation. You shouldn’t be able to take the very shirt off my back by a vote. It’s morally wrong. If you ask me for it though, I of my own FREE CHOICE would be glad to give it to you. I give thousands a year to humanitarian efforts, but I REFUSE to have Obama tell me where to put my money. I will put it where I think it needs to go, as should all other Americans!
If you want freedom, vote for ANYONE other than this Socialist who outright insults the hard working backbone of America!
Posted by: Emily | November 1, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Let’s look at the facts about waht the COMPOUNDING effect of higher rates applied to higher income. Compare a family of 4 with $50K income with same family of 4 with $500K or ten times as much. The fact is the higher income couple with ten times the income pays 45 TIMES the tax in dollars as the other according to my CPA. That is why the fact is that a SMALL percentage of people pay almost all the income taxe dollars. AND those are the same people creating all the jobs as 85% of the high income people are NOT individuals but in fact personal filings with K1 business income INSIDE the personal filing. When you take the money from those people you take the operating income of a business and rstrict it’s ability to hire people and the fct is that 80% of people are employees of theose same businesses. Raise those taxes and you will REDUCE employment ans REDUCE business expansion. When Reagan reduced marginal tax rates the income to the governement ROSE not declined ‘course the politicians spent more resulting in a deficit but that was a spending problem not an income problem. If you rboss gives you a nice raise and you nevertheless end the year with more debt whose problem is that your boss for not paying you enough or you for spending too much. Government has proven with little exception that it will spend he tax income and more regardless of the amount! A poll showed that 75% of the respondants belived the government had some other income above taxes–are you one of those deluded people! There is no free lunch only one bought with a credit card! TClar
Posted by: TClar | November 1, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
RogueWarrior!
Why are you trying to deny them their “right” to own an iPod?
They have the God given right to have one and they can buy it with the check Obama sends them!
:-)
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
I had a boss that there will be changes in the company and then he fired me after I work there from 86 to 97 so he can hire some one he can pay less money to .same as Sen. Obama thats the olny change is helf the work ing man getting fired and the big company moves out of the United State of America to another country. THERES YOUR CHANGE WALFARE I WANT SOME
Posted by: mike | November 1, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
No one is worried about what Obama had to say about the constitution? or the founding fathers? All his tax plan does is reward under-achievers. If you tax the upper 5% more all that will happen is that the consumer will get passed the increase. it’s called inflation people. look what happens every time minimum wage goes up. it hurts everyone.
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Obama’s Tax on the Poor
Tuesday, millions of people will head to the polls and many will be voting for Barack Obama, lured by the siren song of a $1,000 check for pulling the level. But exactly what will their financial condition be under the Obama tax plan? Where will the tax revenue to fund the massive spending programs that Obama wishes to enact?
The Smiths pay no income tax. Jane stays at home with the kids and John earns about $40,000 a year. Still, the Smiths paid Social Security and Medicare taxes. Lets look into the future of John and Jane Smith and their two kids, Jack and Jill and see how they fare under the Obama plan.
Breakfast costs a little more. The cereal for the kids comes from Kellogg’s, a corporation making over $250,000 a year. Kellogg’s saw their taxes go up under the Obama plan. To a corporation, taxes are like an expense. Any tax paid by Kellogg’s is ultimately reflected in the cost of their goods. So to collect the taxes that had to be paid by Kellogg’s, the cost of the cereal went up. But wait, Kellogg’s also had to raise their costs because the cost of their raw materials went up. You see the large farm raising wheat, the paper company that provides the cardboard for the boxes, and the companies that make the production equipment on which the cereal was made all were corporations making over $250,000 a year, so they all had to raise their prices to make up for their increased taxes.
Well, at least it doesn’t cost anymore to heat the apartment since the local gas company’s rates are regulated. Nope. The gas company’s rates are based on expenses. The Obama plan hit energy companies with a windfall profits tax, which was passed on to their customers. So the cost of gas goes up. But wait, there’s more! The cost of the trucks used by the local gas company went up since they were made by a corporation making over $250,000. The cost of the distribution and storage equipment went up since they were made by a corporation making over $250,000. The higher expenses of the gas company were then passed onto the consumer in higher rates.
After breakfast, the Smiths put on their coats and get ready to head out. Those coats cost a little more. They bought them at Wal-mart to try to save money. But Wal-mart is a corporation making over $250,000, so they had to adjust their prices due to higher taxes. Plus, Obama’s trade policies made importation of foreign goods a little more expensive, so the cost of the coats to Wal-mart went up, so Wal-mart had to further raise the price to compensate.
Finally they’re out the door. Now, of course their car cost more, even though they bought it at a local used car dealership. You see, the dealership made over $250,000, so their prices went up. We’ll at least the local mechanic who does the maintenance doesn’t make over $250,000, so the maintenance costs won’t go up. Really? The parts and supplies used by the local mechanic all come from companies making over $250,000, so the higher parts costs are passed on to the consumer.
OK, forget the car, take the bus. Nope, still paying more. The companies that make the buses and supply the fuel make over $250,000, so their prices went up. This forced the city to raise fares to try to compensate (or alternatively, the city had to raise their sales tax to increase revenue – either way the Smiths pay).
This isn’t going so well. At least dropping the kids off at school will be the same. Not so fast. School supplies, textbooks, blackboards, chairs – all from companies earning more than $250,000 (both the manufacturers and distributors of such goods), so the school district’s costs went up. They had to raise local tax rates (their alternative was to fire teachers and have larger classes), which are based on real estate values. So the apartment building owner had to raise the rent in order to pay the higher school tax (plus the building owner was a corporation making over $250,000).
Well, at least John still has a job, doesn’t he? John works at a restaurant, which is hit from both ends. Many of the things they purchase, from food to furniture is from a corporation making over $250,000 a year, so their costs of doing business has escalated. Plus, there are lots of other people are in the Smith’s situation, so they are not eating out as much and business is off. The owner’s reaction is to try to trim expenses. How does she do this? You guessed it, John gets laid off.
So John goes home and watches cable. Nope, the cable company is a corporation making over $250,000. They became too expensive. Well, John can watch the over-the-air broadcast. He just hopes the TV doesn’t break because replacing it would be more expensive since it will have to be imported (subject to the new Obama enacted trade restrictions which tax goods coming into the country) and he’d by it at Best Buy (another corporation making over $250,000 a year).
But wait, who’s that at the door? It’s the mail carrier with a $1,000 check from the government! Yippee!
Posted by: KAD | November 1, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
The MoveOn, DailyKos, ACORN crowd wants to take money away from hard working people, and give it to non-working people. This will DESTROY our economy,which is what the socialist crowd is intent on doing. Obama will take your money and give it to the lazy people, and our economy will tank. KNOW THIS, and don’t try to blame anyone else.
Posted by: Tina | November 1, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Most Americans, republicans especially, knows, deep within that Obama is the best man for the job at this time. But a moth called “RACISM” is eating away their brains and they prefer to be hated by the world for their foreign policies and become the laughing stock of the world as their economy disintegrate than to vote for a black man who many claim is not “real American”. Hey! are you forgetting that you whites are not real Americans either? Check the history books again and you’ll see that you locked the “real Americans” away on reservations. Whom God bless, NO man curse!!!!!!
Posted by: Bill Rodriques | November 1, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
I came into this election with a huge amount of respect for John McCain. I believed in his message in the 2000 election when he agreed with what Barack Obama is now suggesting. Using the tax rate that was in place during the Clinton presidency. I am a person who takes people for face value when they give a direct plan. Obama has a plan for the economy to give a tax break to 95% of WORKING FAMILIES. McCain now supports a plan to give more tax cuts to large corporations and the upper 5% to have it trickle down to the middle and lower class. If the last 8 years have proven anything, it is that the wealthy are way to greedy to let even a penny trickle down. Look at average wages, look at the comparison of the increases to CEO’s to the increase or lack there of the wages of the average worker. I think its time to try another way. I’m tired of the attack against Obama is that he is a liar. This is a man who came from nothing to graduate from Colombia University, Harvard Law, and has been both a State and United States Senator. He has given back to his community through years of service and been a teacher of Constitutional Law. I wish I had accomplished such nothing in my lifetime let alone the last 20 years as he has. Believe what Obama says and if you still think what we have been doing will suddendly turn the economy around, then you know who to vote for. Otherwise, vote for Obama as I will be and hope someday we see the 2000 McCain again.
Posted by: jh | November 1, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Emily,
Death and taxes….get used to it. What largess do you or your business get from the government. The problem with people like you is that you whine about paying taxes, but then expect a handout from the government in the form of some social, tax credit or stimulus program.
Since the turn of the century, we have had a progressive income tax where those who earn more pay more. It’s wealth redistribution, with taxes by the wealthy covering social programs for low income folks. Every man for himself will result in a world that is nasty, short and brutish. Hobbes described the result of Republican selfishness as such:
“Whatsoever therefore is consequent to a time of Warre, where every man is Enemy to every man; the same is consequent to the time, wherein men live without other security, than what their own strength, and their own invention shall furnish them withall. In such condition, there is no place for Industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no Culture of the Earth; no Navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by Sea; no commodious Building; no Instruments of moving, and removing such things as require much force; no Knowledge of the face of the Earth; no account of Time; no Arts; no Letters; no Society; and which is worst of all, continuall feare, and danger of violent death; And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short.”
My dollars are just as hard earned as yours, but at least I realize the social benefits of stability and sharing.
Posted by: Henry | November 1, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
How wise is it to promise to raise taxes on the richest 5% of the people in this country, the only people that can actually afford to pack-up their business and move away. That will leave the rest of the taxpayers the burden of paying even more… just to make up for the lost revenue we once had. The rich didn’t get their money by being stupid.
Posted by: Maxwells | November 1, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Thankfully, we are starting to see Obama’s true marxist roots. Hopefully, it is not too late…
Posted by: Joe E. | November 1, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
” Obama and congress want to do the very things that caused the depression; raise taxes and massively increase government spending. ”
And it was after the Depression when American introverted that global crises arose, Imperialist Japan and Hitler.
While 0bama’s busy redistributing defrauding scraping a much bigger threat will be staring over his shoulder, snickering, plotting.
Do we really want a president who guarantees no energy independence, higher costs, higher taxes, a guaranteed international crisis within 6 months, massive job losses, racial division, sexist leadership?
Aaarrrgh!
Posted by: mon bracelet est plus grand que le vôtre | November 1, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Deep down inside, the Obama supports know that he is a pretender…all hat and no cattle.
Deep down inside people across this country suspect there is something sinister and dishonest about a man who promises the Moon, but doesn’t have the experience to pull any of it off.
Americans also know that you can judge a man by his associations. How many people has Obama thrown under the bus to keep his political train moving?
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
HAHA, wow, ok so et me get this straight, Obama says rich, I supose that that is now defined by those who make more then 120,000 a year according to Richardson NM governor, is rich, WAIT wasnt it 150,000 according to Biden, or was it 200,000 according to B.O. this week, or was it 250,000 according to Barak in the debates? no matter what it is maybe it is the 41,600 that the republicans talk about. I wonder which one it is , no matter what it is Obama is still his aunts keeper that lives in the Slums of Boston, his aunt who is an illegal alien according to the AP…. LOL OH MY GOD!
Posted by: mkspiess | November 1, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
So McCain’s health plan is lousy? At least we will have one with him. Obama’s health care plan is a pipe dream that WON’T happen.
Posted by: Jeff | November 1, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
When taxes are raised on businesses, those business will make up for that lost revenue by either increasing revenues (price increases) or decreasing costs (cut jobs) to make up for it. Is it selfish to want to keep your job?
Posted by: chi-con | November 1, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
What no one seems to understand is that, for the most part, one cannot make 10 million dollars a year without hundreds, thousands or even millions of low paid workers toiling away somehwhere. This idea that everybody can be rich if they just try is completely false. If the rich don’t want to pay higher taxes, then raise the minimum wage to an actual living wage. As it stands, the gap between the rich and poor in America has been widening for some time and something has to be done or we’ll end up with a society where a few are super rich and the majority are struggling to survive. Our education system is already in shambles. Healthcare is a disaster. Our service men and women are not taken care of properly. What kind of society have we created? It needs to change.
Posted by: Alex | November 1, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
obama is absolutely right…rich republicans LOVE welfare as long as it is welfare for them…would cindy mccain like to get another big fat tax break on her $24 million income?…sure she would…but try to give a tax break to someone making $30,000 a year and that’s just horrible socialism..all those rich folks making millions don’t pay crap…they write off everything from expensive restaurant dinners to european vacations as “business expenses” and keep bulk of their money in tax havens like luxemourg, dubai etc…they hire expensive lawyers who’s only job is to make sure that they pay as little as possible…my boss last year had to spend money to avoid paying more taxes – that’s what his bookkeeper told him…spend money or you will pay taxes…did we (employees)get a raise? did we get medical insurance? no…he bought a bmw for his wife, a toyota 4runner for himself (though they had 3 cars already)…all registered to the company, so not only he gets a tax deduction for his cars, but can also write off part of his gas cost…oh yes..and he wet on a little “business trip” to the fiord of Norway…tax deductable too…trickle down economics never worked…NEVER…all they ever created was more poverty, more inequality and more budget deficits…all you have to do is look at the last 8 years…we had to borrow billions upon billions of dollars from communist China to fund wars in Iraq and Afganistan and give tax cuts for the rich at thesame time…and the biggets trick of all is that a good chunk of that borrowed money went straight back to defense contractors – billioner buddies of the GOP…the same people who got bush’s tax cuts..but what do they care? the middle class will be paying this debt off for generations to come…if there’s any middle class left to do that…give me a break…we even had to make charitable donations tax-deductible so that rich folks would be nice enough to give back tons of the unneccesary crap they buy by truck loads to the poor instead of throwing it away
Posted by: mario taras | November 1, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Most Americans, republicans especially, knows, deep within that Obama is the best man for the job at this time. But a moth called “RACISM” is eating away their brains and they prefer to be hated by the world for their foreign policies and become the laughing stock of the world as their economy disintegrate than to vote for a black man who many claim is not “real American”.
—————————————-
I oppose Socialists equally, so I oppose Obama. Marx was white. I detest his ideals as much as I detest the KKK.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Hey Ron,
I teach college. Should I take some points from the genetically gifted (smart) students and give them to the less gifted students?
It will raise the less gifted up to a “C”, but lower the gifted to a “B”.
That’s exactly what Obama wants to do when he says,
“The waitress who can’t afford a 96 inch plasma TV might need your help if you’re a doctor. Give a little to her. Don’t be selfish.”
Obama can’t figure out that some occupations are more valuable to society and so he wants to “spread the wealth around.”
You better hope your child doesn’t go to a school taught by an Obamaniac.
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Deep down inside, the Obama supports know that he is a pretender…all hat and no cattle.
Deep down inside people across this country suspect there is something sinister and dishonest about a man who promises the Moon, but doesn’t have the experience to pull any of it off.
Americans also know that you can judge a man by his associations. How many people has Obama thrown under the bus to keep his political train moving?
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Alex,
What is really funny is that all of the failures you mentioned are GOVERNMENT RUN PROGRAMS.
Do you really want more?
Posted by: RogueWarrior | November 1, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
Please read Obama’s web sit it will explain his tax plan. If you don’t make 250k per year you get a tax cut. By the way he is not increasing tax on people making more that 250k a year. If you remember the tax cut for the top 1% of the people was temporary, and will run out in 2010. It was to stimulate the economy. We all see how those rich people made jobs and helped out the middle class.So he is not raising tax’s just placing them back to the correct rate. Also it was Teddy Roosevelt that started the teared tax system. If you know your history he was a Republican. Should we take him off of Mount Rushmore for being a socialist. If they (McCain) would stop all the fear they are spreading maybe you could think for yourself.
Posted by: Joe Sixpac | November 1, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
First, if you are going to reference a book or website to base your “facts” on Ron, surely you could do better than wiki. It is not reliable and is not even acceptable in most “real world” situations.
Secondly, I’m amazed (living in Texas) at the poor or middle class people that I come in contact with every single day that can’t seem to see the forest for the trees. They simply cannot understand how a democrat could possibly help our country in the situation we are in. They simply cannot fathom how taxing the upper class more than the middle class could actually be more beneficial to them and allow them the opportunity to enjoy more of their hard earned money rather than to give it to Uncle Sam. I am dumbfounded at the obvious ignorance that so many display when it comes to basic politics.
Please educate yourself before “quoting” each politician, policy or platform to eliminate the possibility of sounding ignorant; regardless of who you choose to vote on.
Lastly, does it really take a rocket scientist to figure out that the republican led party has continuously led us down the wrong path for the past 8 years. Can you voters not see that this is simply not working for us and if we have a repulican in office again, we are very likely to have it all happen for another 4 years. American needs a change to benefit the economic hardships of ALL Americans, not just the wealthy. It didn’t work for President Bush and it won’t work for McCain.
Vote for change! The American people deserve change before we are all standing in the breadline for a handout.
Posted by: Tammye | November 1, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Brad Johnson,
First off, thank you for your intelligent response instead of simply bashing.
Look, again, the Alex Rodriquez’s of the world have no doubt earned what they are getting paid, and while I disagree, I will even go along with the argument that CEO’s and other top level execs are paid as determined by the market. My only point is that they are much more capable of paying a larger share. They will still be left with more than most people even dream of.
Further, you and everyone else making the argument that there is a significant numebr of people that will not advance in life regardless of the opportunities laid before them. Yes, there are many that are fine living off of handouts and mooching off the system.
Thus being said, I honestly believe the majority of those in poverty would liek to be out of it, but they DO NOT have the opportunity. Most “help” programs will not give assistance until an individual is destititute, so any minor bump in life devours any savings or assets many trying to “get ahead” have garnered.
I’ll even go one step further. I could go along with not increasing taxes on the rich any further than what they are already. However, under Bush (whom I voted for both times), the top earners of the country have enjoyed tax cuts they arguably would have done quite well without. McCain wants to implement tax cuts which will save another $250,000 or more to the richest people in the nation, while doling out poultry savings to most everyone else.
Really, how much is enough? My dad used to say if you ask the richest person in the world, who has more than he, his children and grandchildren will be able to spend in their lives even if they tried, “How much more do you need?”, the answer would be, “Just a little bit more.”
In other words, greed has no ends. The rhetoric is equal taxes, but that is only because the extremely rich would pay less than they are now. In honesty, they would pay nothing if they could get away with it. (Of course, I’m sure there are exceptions, as there are to any generalization.)
Posted by: Ron | November 1, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
When Obama becomes president, our welfare checks will be strawberry scented. But according to the Liberals, i’m selfish for wanting to keep more of my hard earned money in order to donate to charities that actually make an impact in peoples lives. Liberals don’t understand this because it has been shown that they don’t give as much to charitable causes. In thier minds, Big Brother will take care of everyone. Apparently the father that should have provided for Obama’s family, but left, has been replaced by the government.
Posted by: Matt | November 1, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
When Obama becomes president, our welfare checks will be strawberry scented. But according to the Liberals, i’m selfish for wanting to keep more of my hard earned money in order to donate to charities that actually make an impact in peoples lives. Liberals don’t understand this because it has been shown that they don’t give as much to charitable causes. In thier minds, Big Brother will take care of everyone. Apparently the father that should have provided for Obama’s family, but left, has been replaced by the government.
Posted by: Matt | November 1, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Response to Brad Johnson:
Income Taxes in 1913 were in the form of excise taxes and a little later the US government set up an income tax system to pay for WWI. Income taxes were a flat rate from WWI to the Lyndon B Johnson presidency where he came up with the great society and set up the worst social engineering of the US tax code. A progressive tax I.e. the more you make the higher percentage they take was an invention of LBJ! Oh by the way, was LBJ a DemoNcrat. The reason I mention this is because the fool made the earners who made $150,000 or more in one year pay a top rate of 50 percent. It slowed the economy greatly but did not kill it because the US at the time was still heavily industrialized. But then Jimmy Carter became president and he built on LBJ concept of income Tax and he lowered the threshold from $150,000 to $90,000 in one years time. Next Jimmy Carter and both houses then raised the rate from 50 percent to 70 percent for the top marginal tax rate in the US. The rest is history allowing LBJ and Jimmy Carter to be the modern fathers of outsourcing. It also created the largest exodus for money from the USA to other countries who had lower tax rates. In addition it killed any form of economic life our country might have had from 1978 to 1982. Jimmy Carter also enabled our enemies to sell us Oil and still hate our guts all at the same time. The Fool put a windfall profit tax on oil drilled in the USA again making foreign Oil more attractive over domestic production.
Posted by: vwdudeturbo | November 1, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Roguewarrior – Healthcare isn’t government run. In term of taking care of our service men and women and educating our children, what are you suggesting – we privatize these things? If government programs don’t work the way we want them to, we should change them so they are effective, not throw them out completely.
Posted by: Alex | November 1, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
The comment by Dee “McCain is nothing more than Bush’s clone” demonstrates the sentiment of a millions of intellectual sloths in this country. $600 million pays for a convincing marketing campaign. Unfortunately most Americans are too lazy to scratch below the surface for information, and the press hasn’t provided objective information this time around.
Obama sold millions of you hope and change snake oil.
Posted by: Steve | November 1, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I’d like to believe Obama but he gave me no reason to. He hasn’t been around long enough to prove himself and his word as a politician. All we get every election cycle is promises and good intentions, they all say what we want to hear and they could very well mean it. But the reality of how Washington works, there are so few dollars for so many programs, when one program gets an increase someone elses gets cut, the power struggles ensue and gridlock begins. I’d like to believe Obama, and had he at least completed his first term in the Senate I might. With selecting Joe Biden as his VP, a career Politician with both a Lobbyist Son and Son-in-law tells me not to expect any “change” from Obama, just continous apologies for not knowing how tough it was really going to be.
Posted by: Maxwels | November 1, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I’m a physician, and I make over $250,000 a year. I work nights, weekends and holidays. Matter of fact, it is 2 AM Saturday morning. I worked all night Friday until now when I am just getting home from work. I wasn’t able to go trick-or-treating with my family. I am just getting home from work. I EARN what I make. But on January 1, 2009, I am QUITTING my work. I have notified my patients. I am bitter and disillusioned. I am going to live off my savings. Why should I work so hard and sacrifice, and then be called selfish. I plan over the next 1-2 years to get my affairs in order, and move overseas and obtain foreign citizenship. Oh, by the way, I will pay almost $200,000 in taxes this year. Next year I will $0 since I plan to have no taxable earnings in the US.
Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Joe Sixpac
Your comment:
“So he is not raising tax’s just placing them back to the correct rate.”
ROFLMAO.
Yeah, “the correct rate,” that’s the ticket!
You have the talking points down pat though!
Posted by: lweaton | November 1, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
“This is the Christian way, such harmony!”
No, thats not Christianity, not when its government mandated. in actuality the bible teaches quite the opposite, the hard worker is rewarded while the lazy go hungry.
Posted by: PK | November 1, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
If I remember right, didn’t Obama’s tax records show that he himself had given very little to charity? And most of that being to Rev Wright’s Church, a preacher who preached against America.
So who’s selfish?
Posted by: Jerry S | November 1, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
1.The bottom 38% of americans pay 0% of the countrys taxes,yet they get a rebate
2. The “Rich” people with incomes over $250,000 account for almost all the job creation in America, Yet they shoulder the highest tax rates
3.Obamas “95% of Americans will see a tax savings” is a half-truth, he will also let the Bush Tax cuts expire and this will RAISE taxes on most Americans, so that tax “savings” is actually an increase.
4. The United States Declaration of Independence affords every person the Right to “Life, Liberty and the PURSUIT of happiness” NOT the Promise of Happiness, NOT the Right of Happiness the PURSUIT, YOU need to aspire to greatness not expect it.
5. Corporations do NOT pay taxes, YOU DO. Any increase in taxes is passed along to their customer and if business is slow because of the new higher price of product, they fire or lay off workers. You want jobs and cheap products, you lower EVERYONES taxes and cut Government spending.
Posted by: jed | November 1, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
I just wish I had not wasted so much of my life trying.
I got a 50 cent per hour pay raise one time. At the end of my next pay period I was surprised to find that my pay check was actually less than before the raise. I had hit the next tax bracket and the gov actually got all my raise and then some. I asked my employer to take the raise back but they couldn’t. So the logical thing to do was cut my hours back. Why work more for less?
Now that I am a business owner I will do the same. I will cut back… cut expansion, wages, benefits, advertising, air conditioning and most of all employees. You see there are not enough loop holes in the tax law to keep my business running. The risk I take is not worth the reward.
No, I’m not selfish. But I never would have spent $300 per sign to post a mile marker every 2 tenths of a mile on our interstate. (both sides no less) I just do not have the money for that this week.
With Hope on the horizon my best opportunity lies in the promise of a free ride.
Posted by: lostnfound | November 1, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
HAHAHA! I love all these people who use the word “socialist”. I wonder how many of them actually know what it really means. They probably don’t since all they are are parrots who do nothing but repeat what they hear on television. They are too ignorant to know otherwise. Oh, here’s a little fact for you. The notion of a progressive tax (the more you earn the higher your tax bracket) was started by Pres. Teddy Roosevelt – a Republican – and John McCain’s self-proclaimed idol. Put that in your hats and smoke it all you stupid republicans who don’t even know what a socialist is. HAHAHA..your stupidity is funny and scary.
Posted by: John | November 1, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
ROFLMAO,
Not talking points just the fact’s which you don’t understand.
Posted by: Joe Sixpac | November 1, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Hi Emily,
I am curious. Does your business earn more than 250,000.00 a year of taxable income? If so, then you are right that your taxes would go up under Obama. I think you should be proud of the business you have created. You must have been blessed with some strong ingenuity to accomplish this. That is something to be respected for and to be proud of. You may not have been born rich in money, but you were blessed with other things that have given you the ability to be successful.
We do have some differences of opinion, though. I am a hard-working 7th grade English teacher. I work long days and often don’t have time to go to the bathroom. I earn 44,000.00 a year (taxable income is lower of course), and that is with 15 years experience and 2 degrees. It doesn’t go very far. I too consider myself a hard-working freedom loving American. Many hard-working freedom loving Americans earn less than 250,000.00/year taxable income. I don’t think Obama is speaking to all “hard-working freedom-loving Americans”. I think he is talking to a minority of Americans who find themselves in prosperous positions but whom lobby against being asked to give a bit more. Man, if I had an extra 206,000.00 a year, I would feel pretty generous about giving a bit more to benefit education, healthcare, building roads and other infrastructure our society needs, fighting crime etc.I believe that in a society in which all have access to a quality of life that there would be less crime, less sickness, and less suffering. Whatever I can offer more to ensure that for the next generation makes me proud.
I don’t know if your taxable income is really over 250,000 a year ater you pay your 10 employees. If it is less than that, I recommend you look into Obama’s plan more closely. It may actually help you. I know he wants to give tax breaks to businesses that create jobs and don’t “outsource” them to other countries, and it sounds like you are creating jobs.
If you are making over 250,000 taxable income, then good for you. That must feel really great after the struggle you have been through to get there. You are truly experiencing the American dream. I know that for Obama, that is what this country is about. He just wants to give as many people the opportunity to experience that as possible. I honestly believe that John McCain is a pawn of big corporations like big oil, and that their success is his first interest, not yours or mine.
Posted by: caroline haagenstad | November 1, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Tom,
Dont quit just yet, alot of us are disillusioned, but i got a feeling old b. hussein obama is not going to be the one sitting in the oval office come jan 1st.
remember in 2000 and 2004 how badly off the poles were? and frankly i dont think all the left leaning biased media reporting they can muster is going to sell a card carrying socialist to the American public.
And yes, he is a card carrying socialist, hes listed as a member in a number of places on the democratic socialists of america’s website during the 1990′s. (still viewable online)
Posted by: PK | November 1, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Let’s extend this to all areas. In school it isn’t fair for some kids to get A’s and B’s the others need a help up, I say take some points from the A and B students, (they can afford it) and give them to the D and F students and make them C students. Just spreading the wealth around. For all others in favor of Obama’s spread the wealth program, when you get your next pay check give half of it away, to people that have less than you and do this every payday. You will still have plenty left over. Obama calls people who for some crazy reason believe they ought to be able to keep most of what they earn as selfish. He encourages envy, coveteousness, I guess these are virtues he likes.
Posted by: Kevin C | November 1, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
He is calling hard working Americans selfish? I am truly angry. I have worked hard, paid off loans for college and law school. My husband and I own 2 businesses and employ 80 people in 2 states. We took out loans to buy the businesses and are still paying on them. We provide benefits to our employees and give them good bonuses each year. Sometimes we do not take a bonus so our employees can have them. Our tax return will put us in the so called rich category, but with our business loans, one child just finishing college and 3 more to go, orthodontics and everything else, I can tell you that we are hardly rich. This man has no clue what it is like to live in the real world.
We work very hard. There is this mistaken belief that people that make more than Obama’s magic number are rolling in the dough and playing golf every day.
I would have no problem paying taxes if the politicians in Washington would show some restraint in spending. I am not going to turn over my hard earned money so it can be given to some Senator for an earmark. Obama has asked for a million dollars in earmarks for each day that he has been Senator, which we all know has not been long. He wants to tax and spend. If he gets elected, we will have to lay off people or raise the cost of our goods.
I would rather have a true Reagan republican in office who is going to cut the pork, get rid of earmarks and be fiscally responsible.
Mccain is not Bush. They don’t even like each other. I am sick of hearing it will be more of the same.
Obama’s theory of building from the bottom up will not work because the people on the so called bottom do not want to work. They want everything handed to them. They believe they are owed. It won’t work, it will just pull businesses down resulting in higher costs of goods, unemployment and businesses moving to a more business friendly country.
Obama is inexperienced and has never run a business. Obama will do nothing to help us, only hurt us. He has no clue. I pray McCain wins, for my family’s sake, our employees’ sake and our country’s sake.
Sharon
Posted by: Sharon | November 1, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
So I see the neoCONS (and yes – they are con artists) are still sticking to their FUD campaign. That makes sense considering they have nothing of real value to bring to the table this election cycle. But while all of you are at your computers being crybabies, rational people with progressive ideas and the goals of getting our country back to a place of respectability and solvency are out in force, successfully getting more and more people to see past your antiquated, broken, hateful methods. Throw a tantrum all you like – it’s over. The country is about to take a big leap forward and hopefully you will come along for the ride. But, if not, if you want to continue to whine about how awful gov’t “handouts” are (I wont even get into what BS that is) then you feel free to take any profits you enjoy after Obama is president and you just send them right to the wealthiest person you know. I’m sure they’ll be ever grateful, and somehow it will trickle down back to you…
Posted by: ellie | November 1, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
What about the money being taken by the grocery store, utility companies, gas station, doctor’s office, and the banks? Are they being selfish to?
Posted by: Bchem | November 1, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Hump Doggie wrote:
“Why should I feel bad for the rich that have most likely made their gains immorally for the last 20 years (shady politics, industry lobby’s, sky high interest charges, late fees, surcharges, inflated prices, etc…) that they now have to play by “rules” and not screw everyone out of their HARD EARNED money just like the right wingers. ”
—————————————
Obama made 1.6 Million Dollars in 2005. Did he make his money immorally and now you are voting for him?
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
to maria; “Everytime the government intrudes on private enterprise things go south. If left alone, the market continually corrects itself”….yeah, sure..the “market” is currently “correcting iteself”…former CEO’s of failed companies are walking away with millions of $$$, while we are being stuck with the bill…give me a break…”the market” has only one objective: steal as much as possible as fast as you can and then get bailed out by the “horrible” government..they even have a great euphemism for this: “business cycle”, which basicaly means cook the books for as long as you can (usually for about 10 to 15 years) and then bail when the ####t hits the fan
Posted by: mario | November 1, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Don’t forget how little Barack (or was it Barry at the time?) shared his toys. Now he wants to share yours!
Posted by: Jerry S | November 1, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Murdock’s money protects him for the time being. All bets are off for his health and prosperity in future should the Messiah be elected. To date, we have been provided several glimpses into how Obama, The Great Unifier, would deal with adversity once he is installed as the leader of the free world. Government agency’s dug deep into Joe The Plumbers life looking for dirt. Governor Palin has been ruthlessly, cruelly, and criminally attacked 24/7 since she first walked on stage at the GOP convention. Three respected news organizations that had been with Our Dear Leader from the start of his fraudulent campaign were booted out after endorsing the senile, unpredictable, angry, uncontrollable, diaper wearing McCain. They were told there was no longer room for them on Obama One, his cheap imitation of the real Air Force One, adorned with adolescent and self worshiping versions of the presidential seal and other foolish tapestry. A nearly extinct version of a journalist dared to ask the lunatic Joe Bidden a few hard questions, and her entire news organization was summarily banned from any further access to The One. Despite all of this and much more, perhaps the most ominous thing to come out of this gang of thugs is the re-introduction of the incongruously named “Fairness Doctrine”. This thing is a device to shut down AM talk radio, and a tool to silence any and all opposition under the absurd guise of “Fairness”. Aside from Murdock’s Fox News. Talk Radio is virtually the only media outlet that provides accurate investigations of the liberal elite when none of the major media will. It is also the only remaining place where one can find honest, and thoughtful dissent against The One and his minions. The Diva Pelosi and the Himmler impersonator Harry Reid are on record for wanting to shut down this avenue of free speech. Obama has been recorded several times railing against Sean Hannity, of all people. Its a sure thing that the FIRST Amendment of the constitution, the one guaranteeing the absolute right of Free Speech, will amended once again. The latest version will make any kind of opposition to the new Lord on Earth a criminal offense. Welcome to the “Change We Can Believe In”. An American Stalin is waiting in the wings.
Posted by: Raymundo | November 1, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
ellie
—————————————
Obama made 1.6 Million Dollars in 2005. Did he make his money immorally and now you are voting for him?
Since you think I am a neo-con. I think you are a leftist socialist parasite that seeks a collectivist social structure that will tell us how to think and feel. Your social program is the one that kills humanity. I believe in humanity. I believe in freedom. I oppose socialism and will defend our Constitution at all costs for my children. Your “leader” Obama is a liar. He took advantage of the strong economy to become a millionaire, now he wants to control the economy with his social programs for his “constituents” – leftists. He will always cater to the poor for his voting base. He is a marxist. Marxists are parasites.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
I lived in a Democratic socialist country for a year.
Italy. Most of them don’t like it but you don’t hear that until you live there for a while, and you don’t see the problems that come about because of it until you live there for a while either. If Obama takes 1000K from someone and gives it to you it doesn’t suddenly become 2000K. It creates nothing.
Obama’s economic plan will enact five of the same policies that Hoover did just before the Depression.
Overtaxation, his war against prosperity includes increasing income taxes, taxes on capital gains and dividends, estate taxes, Social Security taxes, and windfall profit taxes, protectionism, expanding govt. substantially, and forced unionization.
Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | November 1, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Please Note: Obama’s Grandma is living in a hut with no running water. Obama’s
half brother is living in a hut on $1 a month. Obama’s aunt in an illegal alien
living on welfare in a Boston housing
project. (She did manage to send $260 to
Obama’s campaign) If this guy can’t take
care of his blood relatives, what makes anyone think he’s going to take care of
them? America has really dumbed down!
Posted by: Rick Aztlan | November 1, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am
I am not White not Black, but a Native American. I can say this: American people are being screwed by the White Democrat who used a Black man, Obama to grab power and to turn America to be a Maxist Socialism, the regime that those millions around the world have tried to risk their lives run away from to live in America.
The Democrat have always tried to scare the American people and lie to get people’s votes. If the Democrat care for the poor so much how come those homeless people, ACORN the leftist organization registered them are still homeless?
the Democrat blame President, but they themselves are the ones who destroy the economy.
Let these leftist tatse socilaism. Wait until the Democrat get power, these people will taste Obama’s depotism.
Posted by: beatrice | November 1, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am
Dee:
I would vote for Thomas Sowell. I would prefer him over Clinton, Gore, Kerry or Obama.
This is not about race. It is about ideology. obama is a marxist.
Posted by: Brad Johnson | November 1, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
Tom…
Well see come the 5th.
Posted by: PK | November 1, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
The main thing that needs fixing in this country is the various government entities that are in shambles due to lax oversight and poor management. THAT is why it is so important for any democrat to win this election. McCain would probably only replace 20-40% of Bush’s appointess! Obama likely will remove 95% or more.
Those of you who are against that can continue to let your babies chew on lead paint and god knows what else that comes in the crap we buy from China. We’ve all seen what letting companies ‘police’ themselves has gotten us. Anyone that wants to continue with more of the same has got to be crazy. We MUST have competent government oversight like we had before Bush took office. I don’t care who gives it to us quite frankly. I just don’t believe McCain will.
The economy would never be in this kind of trouble if we had been paying attention to what was going on with wall street. The derivatives market is a ridiculous joke. Also credit default swaps are completely ridiculous. The market for them is totally unregulated. They are using the swaps to insure worthless, crap investments. People are too stupid to realize how bad they are. After all, they are insured! You can’t insure investments like that though, so they just call them default swaps and it makes everything OK and unregulated. A lot of people knew the kind of trouble that was on the horizon, but nobody wanted to listen while they were stuffing their pockets full of cash. Now we’re all left to pay the bill with lost jobs and depleted savings! You wouldn’t allow anyone to play with trillions of dollars without oversight! Why are we allowing these rich bastards to? This isn’t a partisan issue. If we don’t restore the fundamental regulations that our economy relies upon we’ll end up losing credibility with the world.
Posted by: Danyul | November 1, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Of course, republicans don’t mind selfishness, as long as my money is being taken out of my pocket to pay for idiots with mortgages. Or to subsidize tax breaks for idiots who squirt out children. Or for idiots who get married. Or for corporations run by idiots. Yeah, then that’s just fine. Why not whiddle my six figure salary down to five figures, Republicans? You’re all just as bad as the idiot democrats.
Posted by: no | November 1, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
The majority of these posts defending Obama are nothing more his “soldiers” defending his socialist agenda. Ask Obama what he thinks about the Constitution he may be taking an oath to defend. Look up his opinion of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. You may be surprised. He’s a Marxist who is lying his way into the White House. He shuts down any dissention from his political point of view. I’m sure I may be in jail soon just for airing my opinion if he wins the White house. Look what he did to “Joe the plumber”. You fools that vote for this joker will have to live with it for the rest of your moronic lives.
Posted by: SJ | November 1, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am
I’m single and live alone. I am paying off my house and a new car. e I’m taxed a third of my wages as it is and have to work over time just to make ends meet. I don’t have kids of my own. And don’t want any with the way kids are now. When they took prayer out of school and then when teachers weren’t alowed to pattle kids on the gluteus maximus when they start fights no wonder kids act the way they do. Because kids aren’t taught respect for athority at home then parents get what they deserve. Teachers can only do so much and now that they can’t paddle a child when they need it then its any wonder we haven’t had a major walk out of teachers.
I’m just glad my grandparents aren’t around to see the disrespactful, ingrates in the obama camp. My forfathers fought and some died for this country to get us where we are today. If you don’t like my country then get the heck out!!!
Posted by: Kimbo | November 1, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
“The united states on the other hand has a wide range of natural resources (unfortunately not oil since the peaking in the 70′s)-”
Sure we do, besides alaska and the arctic, there is believed to be one of the biggest oil/natural gas deposits in the entire world, right under the montana region. The only reason people mistakenly believe the US is somehow devoid of these natural resources is because for years weve allow the eco-nazi’s to dictate our resource exploration policies.
i have no doubt under a mccain/pailn ticket these rediculous restrictions will finally be lifted and we can get off the arab teet to a great degree, wereas im also quite sure that under an obama/biden ticket these restrictive and utterly foolish policies will continue.
Posted by: PK | November 1, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
I would not vote for Obama if he lowered my taxes to zero. (He actually might if I lose my job). He is too shady and I don’t like the fact that he refuses to salute the American flag and wants to change the national anthem. His thugs will go after anyone who questions him at all, including “Joe the Plumber” and the two news reporters who asked tough questions of him and Joe Biden. Anyone who supports him should look up and read a story written by Kurt Vonnegut called “Harrison Bergeron”. If this guy pulls off the greatest con job of all time and gets elected, we may have to build a fence to keep people from leaving the country.
Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
There is nothing more selfish than power-grabbing politicos presuming to tell other people that they don’t deserve their earnings. Obama can go to hell, and he can take John McCain with him.
-jcr
Posted by: John C. Randolph | November 1, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am
This is a spin. “All boats rise” all right, when we are free to earn and spend as we please. But NOT when Mr. Obama takes our earnings and just GIVES it to those who don’t give enough in exchange (if they did, they wouldn’t need handouts, they would simply earn).
Posted by: Greg | November 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am
The American dream doesn’t exist anymore in this country, because liberal progressive ideas have erased all traces of personal responsibility. While in high school, I knew I had to make good grades to get into college. So I chose to do just that. In college, I could have majored in anything I wanted, chose nursing (noble but not lucrative profession) knowing I would never be rich. I made this decision!!!! I am currently working on a master’s degree so I can eventually earn more money. I am paying for this degree myself. No handouts expected here. My point being, Obama is only playing into wealth envy. Creating rifts between the classes. You chose to be a teacher and make 44,000. You chose to be a firefighter and make 35,000. You chose to be cashier at Wal-Mart and make 25,000. You have only you and your poor decisions to blame. The beauty of the American dream is that we can be anything we want to be. And while it may not be easy for everyone, the potential is there and it just takes hard work. Why should someone who chooses a different profession that happens to make more money have to pay a higher percent of taxes? I am not selfish, because I want to keep as much of my hard earned money as possible. I have no problem with giving money away to charitable causes. What I have a problem with is the government stealing my money and then dictating how it is to be used. If this government keeps giving handouts and punishing the successful, where’s the motivation to succeed?
FAIRTAX
Posted by: britt | November 1, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am
I don’t think that selfishness is the right word. American people are good, generous people. It is just that they have been massively brainwashed for so long that even the otherwise reasonable and functioning people become complete zombies the moment the key word “sharing”, or “socialist”, is pressed. It would be funny if not sad, and, as the last 8 years testify, very dangerous for everybody (including the zombies themselves).
Yet, they never learn, and so a guy who is determined to give them a tax break is called names and branded a “socialist”, while the rich old guy who is proponent of the failed “trickle down” philosophy which ends every 10 years in a massive redistribution of wealth from the tax payers to the rich Wall St bankers (who, by the way, get to keep their past multimillion dollar spoils), gets their vote…and so we can have more of the same redistribution of wealth again and again and again…Not this time, I hope.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Excuse me, I am the lawyer who has the business that has a loan not Tammy. It is not a fake loan. We bought the business from a retiring couple several years ago and took out a loan to do this. There are assets that back up the loan. You must not know much about business. This is a very common practice. I never said the business has tanked. We are actually making it through the economy dip. I am not even talking abou the current economic situation. It appears that you did not understand the point of my post. That is too bad.
I am not complaining about my situation. We have worked hard and we have earned what we have. We also pay plenty of taxes. We are the typical business owner. I am proud of our accomplishments and proud to be able to provide jobs.
I do not think I deserve your judgments and criticisms. My point is I am angry that Obama (and now you) calls us selfish. I am also frustrated because there are a lot of people who think that people who make over this magic number Obama came up with have all this extra money to give away.
my priority is my family and once they are taken care of we give our money to charities. I prefer to choose a charity that I believe will put the money to good use and spend it wisely. Unfortunately I do not have that faith in the government. They have proven over and over they do not spend money wisely and they are corrupt. If other “unselfish people” by Obama standards, want to give more to the federal government then the government should establish a foundation and let them do so. All the hollywood types and Warren Buffett should give their extra money to the government.
Isn’t it amazing that I get attacked by you and called selfish for: educating myself, working hard, paying my loans and debts, providing for my family, providing jobs to others, trying to build retirement so the government won’t have to take care of me, paying taxes and giving to charity. Only in America.
Sharon
Posted by: Sharon | November 1, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am
For Sharon -Yes Obama has faired better under Bush and that is the whole point.
Wealthy Americans are taxed at a lower rate than the middle and lower class.
Do you think it is fair that we pay a higher percentage on medicare, ss, and payroll taxes than the rich do? Obama is not taking anything from the wealthy that they shouldn’t have to pay. McCain & Palin have played dirty politics and Obama has acted in a presidential manner. McCain does not have the even temperament to be president. He also is just another older version of Bush. I can see him now on Letteman’s presidential speeches. We need to elect a president that we can be proud of instead of the laughingstock of the world. By the way, I’m sure Joe the plmber does not make 250,000 a year, and he has not even paid last years taxes (under Bush). When I registered to vote many years ago, my mother told me that when the
Republicans are in office only the rich get richer. She also told me we would go to war and the economy would go to hell. Sound familiar? Mothers know best. I remember very well during the primary hearing McCain say that he was not strong in economics and that we might be in Iraq for a 100 years. Contrary to what the Republican party would have you believe, Obama is not a
marxist, a terrorist, or a muslim. And all muslims are not terrorists. If McCain is so great, why hasn’t he made changes in the 28+ years he has been a
senator. If Obama wanted to attack McCain on his character, he would mention the hell he put his first wife and kids through. They do not even acknowledge him. McCain does not want
Americans to know about his infidelity
and drug use.
Posted by: nanakaye | November 1, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
nanakaye….in regards to your comment
“Do you think it is fair that we pay a higher percentage on medicare, ss, and payroll taxes than the rich do?”
Are you aware that the top 10% of wage earners in this country pay nearly 80% of all income tax? There is no way you are paying a higher percentage than the “rich”.
Posted by: britt | November 1, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am
Thank you Mrs. Tim McGraw for using Cuba as an example of what this country can become. Growing up in South Florida since the 50′s I’ve known many Cuban’s who fled Fidel’s promises. Lets not chance what the pretty boy has to promise!
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
ready for the “PRESIDENTIAL VOTER PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT ACT of 2008″ no matter who wins? PLAN SUMMARY: In an effort to revive the US economy and for the US goverment to help pay for any new federal programs or expansion of existing federal programs that may be enacted by the next president, legislation is currently being considered to assess a special tax ONLY ON THOSE VOTERS WHO VOTED FOR THE NEXT PRESIDENT and apply the tax to fund these federal programs. LOYALTY TAX: Some are calling it a loyalty tax as it empowers voters who put a new president into office to also be responsible for financing additional federal spending enacted by the new president. ACCORDING TO YOUR MEANS: The actual amount of tax each individual would have to pay is to be based on a sliding scale, depending not only on your income, but on your assets/net worth and how much you may already be benefitting by federal entitlements.
Posted by: querelajo | November 1, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am
Thank goodness I’m hearing some reason and logic here. The media would have us all thinking that Obama can do no wrong when what he wants to do is ALL wrong.
I am a working single mom and I work in social service. I see day in and day out my clients drag their feet about finding work. Watch as they turn down jobs I work hard to get them. When their time in one program runs out, they jump into another all along doing whatever they can to avoid employment so as to not give up the free money and services, free time and free daycare which they get for staying home. (Yeah free daycare for not working because they are “Looking” for work supposedly.) Free to go to some of the nicest daycares we have around here too btw. How much are you working parents paying for daycare? How about to go to the really nice ones? Well the working are paying not only for our daycare but for the welfare recipients daycare too. This is my lovely common wealth state. These welfare clients go from one training to the next, all free for them while our tax money pays to give them free money, food, and reduced housing so they can jump from free training and college to another and another. I have clients with so many career certificates all paid for with our tax dollars. They CAN find jobs they just do not want to.
My clients talk about that all the time. Always complain that if they get a job they will not get welfare money and free food and free rent and free Christmas truckloads etc. They complain because they will have to pay $100 a mo for rent if they work instead of getting it free. They say they deserve welfare and many have hardly worked more then a few months here and there through their lives. When those stimulus checks went out I heard clients who have not worked in years saying they are also going to be given some money back. BACK huh. Back would be saying you paid something in to begin with and they have not.
Some clients will go the extra effort and work about three months a year, or whatever the minimum is, they know what that is. Then they can file taxes get every penny back, be exempt and still earn thousands in child tax credits this way. Guess who is paying the taxes so they do not have to, yeah all of us working all year. Even me a single working mom, who only makes $15 and hour. Yet they are entitled to a BIGGER tax refund because they worked less then me and contributed less to society. They actually cost society more money and are rewarded for that, while all us working stiffs pay the price and the penalties for the lazy percent who can work but don’t want to give up the freebees and the freedom to stay at home and watch Jerry Springer.
I am in a common wealth state (with a Governor it turns out is a buddy of Obama’s) and before I moved here I never thought about what that meant. I was not in a common wealth state before, now I know what it means, oh boy do I know. When I look at my taxes and my refund and then I look at that if my non-working welfare-receiving clients who and I kid you not, take their very large refunds and go on cruses and time-shares for weeks on end it makes me sick. We work and pay more to make up for their choice not to work. So I have never been able to go on a cruse or a time share nor have I had the time because I work, where as they have unlimited time to do whatever they want. Sleep late, travel, go to events free with donated ticket or funds from programs for the non-working and “Poor” while the working cannot even imagine being able to afford to attend these expensive shows let alone bring their family to a show. Well the “Poor“ get free admission to many of the things the working class can‘t afford.
I feel sick to my stomach when I think about how much more these clients will have free if Obamba is elected. Gov’t was starting to tighten its belt and starting to try to limit how long a person could take without getting a job and giving back.
If Obama gets in the floodgates will open back up for the people who have made a career out of being on welfare, then the next service and next before cycling back round through them again, all while enjoying the fruits of the working classes labor. I was happy when I seen some rules going into effect to limit the freebees to the ones who chose welfare. With Obama those rules will go out the window. We will start to see more and more of the people who finally had to get a job because welfare said times up, going right back on welfare for all the freebees if Obama gets in.
We will be paying more money for products because it cost businesses more to buy things because, it cost manufactures more to make things because; the tax increases to the industries will trickle back to the people in the form of higher prices. Oh and lets not forget those welfare recipients will want more money because things cost more so, we the working people will have to pay more from our paychecks, (don’t let Obama’s sales pitch without a plan fool ya) because those welfare recipients will be given more services, more money, more free college and training, more time to keep taking without giving because things cost more. Guess who is going to pay for that too, us the working people who are paying our dues and theirs.
Oh and Obama will want us to pay for the fish in other countries too, trillions. Instead of letting those countries take care of their own or teaching them to fish instead of handing them free fish, over and over like he wants to do here in the USA too. I can hardly afford to pay for the ones who don’t work here I can’t afford to take on other countries responsibilities too, I just can’t.
Posted by: Workingclassmom | November 1, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
Workingclassmom: Obama plan will lower the taxes to 95% of the *working* people. You have to work and pay payroll or income taxes (or both) to get the tax break under his plan. Please go to his site and read if serious and interested. Regards.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am
Question to you LEN,
By how many poor people have you been employed? Your Stalinist propaganda is just idiotic. Bailout was DEMANDED by Democrats, not Republicans (remember the first vote, or where you on drugs?). Do you know why? Because, DEMOCRATES were the ones, who created FEN and FRED mess. Bailout was NOT to help rich, but corporations which are part of majority of retirement plans in USA. Allowing Lehman Broths to go under, the entire world was thrown into today’s mess. Even French commies criticized US for letting it happen. Am I happy about the bailout? NO. Most of Americans are not, but it was probably the necessary evil.
USA cannot afford Obama and his socializm.
Posted by: Boggy | November 1, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am
hahahaha, i’m the poster boy for socialism as i am totally disabled. i’m going to get all the rich people’s money. only one problem, i don’t want their money, but hey, no one asked me.i worked for 35 years collect social security disability, get a pension from the veterans for an injury i got while serving my country and live modestly. for those of you who say i’m already a socialist i remind you that when i was working i always paid the maximum into social security, and had no choice. all the government wants to do is what socialism does, spread the misery around. we will get their faster with obama. you have been warned.
Posted by: jim | November 1, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am
I don’t think that selfishness is the right word. American people are good, generous people. It is just that they have been massively brainwashed for so long that even the otherwise reasonable and functioning people become complete zombies the moment the key word “sharing”, or “socialist”, is pressed. It would be funny if not sad, and, as the last 8 years testify, very dangerous for everybody (including the zombies themselves).
Yet, they never learn, and so a guy who is determined to give them a tax break is called names and branded a “socialist”, while the rich old guy who is proponent of the failed “trickle down” philosophy which ends every 10 years in a massive redistribution of wealth from the tax payers to the rich old guys on Wall St (who, by the way, get to keep their past multimillion dollar spoils), gets their vote…and so we can have more of the same upward redistribution of wealth again and again and again…Not this time.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am
Some of the conversations on this post are just stupid. All of this about some damn taxes, please. Jake get a job!
Posted by: Laura | November 1, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am
PDSimic:
“Yet, they never learn, and so a guy who is determined to give them a tax break is called names and branded a “socialist”
This guy wants to give NOMINAL tax breaks, but the net effect=redistribution, like in the European Union. Do you like the economic system in highly socialized EU countries? Before you answer, better go there and COMPARE THE PRICES OF GOODS AND SERVICES.
So what, that my taxes are seemingly “lowered” if I can afford less, because the less efficient economy and indirect taxation raises the cost of necessities? No, thank you very much, Mr. Obama. I lived in EU, and I got fed up. The ridiculed “trickle down” system distributes wealth. Redistribution distributes poverty only.
Posted by: Greg | November 1, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
There’s alot of talk here about Obama wanting to send this country into a socialist state.
On his web site he says will tax those who have more than others in order to spread the wealth.
He and his Bubba Joe B. will have everyone from 18 years old on to serve in the military for two years. They call some of it community service,HMMM.
These two are so paranoid of their new policies that they are going to institute a National Police Force. This will ensure who’s safety? Didn’t Hitler do that?
They want to provide all our soldiers with the equipment they need in the field to do their jobs. That won’t cost us much once they reduce the military down to nothing like Clinton did. Maybe they can become the NPF.
Obama wants to disarm our country to a level that his Muslim bretheren won’t feel threatened. I’m wondering, IN WHAT COUNTRY! He must be talking about this one because we can always NUKE the rest of them.
Hey all you State Governors, Legislators, and Law enforcement types, what is going to be your response when the boys from Washington have you go out and try to confiscate our means of self protection. Are you going to roll over or are you going to uphold your sworn oath. You know, the one that you and I all took, that “I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies both foreign and domestic”.
Think about it!
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am
I agree with Obama. Personally, I feel America is very selfish! American is broke, the banks corrupt and the American people just want free money.
I have a question for you, did you serve in the military? If not, then you do not deserve tax breaks! Time for you take make a sacrifice for your country. So little it asked of you!
I served my country so you can feel free! I served my country so you can take advantage of all the freedoms so many of my friends died for, all while you sat home, and helped break America but supporting bad government spending, taking out loans when you could not afford them, applying for every credit card you could so you did not have to spend you on hand cash. Well, it is time for Americans to pay up, especially those who make over $250,000. Most of these people do not pay taxes anyway due to fancy write offs each year!
It is funny however that the soldiers fighting for your freedoms are willing to take higher taxes for help the country they love. They make very little, yet are willing to give even more to America so you can sit comfortable, fat and greedy!
America has become the home of the “give me, give me, give me”.
Look at your parents during WW II, they helped this country in a time of need without question.
Damn this MTV, GOP and “ME” generation. I feel it is time for the mandatory military service! I am ashamed of the selfishness of the American people! I served my country, I am disabled because of my service, I am a patriot and I will pay higher taxes to help rebuild this country.
Posted by: Michael | November 1, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
Greg: Any tax system is redistribution. During Regan years the tax bracket was 50%. During Clinton, 39.6%. During Bush, 35%. Look at the economy and prosperity in these three periods. It is safe to say that today, at the end of the 8 years of Bush in office and 35% tax rate, we all are much worst off then we where under both, Clinton and Regan. So it is dishonest and unfair to call Obama socialist for wanting to let Bush tax cut for rich expire, and for wanting to lower the taxes on 95% of the Americans. He is proposing tax cut for the middle class, period. That much is clear and should be acknowledged. Just a common decency.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Jim – thank you for your service and thank you for your post. You are NOT a poster child for Socialism. You are an example of what the government should be doing to take care of people that have worked and paid their dues (in social security and service).
nanakaye – “Wealthy Americans are taxed at a lower rate than the middle and lower class.” Say what? What numbers do you have that support that? Even with payroll taxes, how do you figure that? 39.89% of wage earners pay NO income tax, only payroll of 7.65%. I’m sure there are plenty of “Wealthy Americans” that would like to pay that tax rate. Now, as for tax burden, did you know that in 2006 the top 1% paid 40% of the income tax burden? The top 25% pay 86% leaving the bottom 75% to pay 14% of the tax burden, of which the bottom 50% pay only 3% of the income taxes. Who’s taxed at a lower rate? It’s definitely those rich people. Let’s tax them more. Maybe you would be okay with the top 25% paying 100% of the tax burden? Would that be fair? Or should the top 10% pay all of it? By the way, when Bush took office those evil rich people, the top 1%, paid 33.71% of the income tax burden. Under his evil watch those nasty rich people got a big break because they now pay 39.89%. Damn that Bush.
I’m sorry for the dripping sarcasm but your statement is outrageous. So is all of this class warfare that Obama is playing. What’s sad is that people are buying it and not looking into the facts. Bush’s tax cuts helped everyone. Google “ten myths about the bush tax cuts” and read the Heritage Foundation’s article.
Posted by: kf | November 1, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
What Obama fails to understand is that the economy of the 1990′s was a result of the efforts of investors and software engineers and nothing the government did. I will give Clnton credit for not screwing it up as it unfolded before him.
Posted by: robster | November 1, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am
PDSimic – Reagan dropped the top rate from 70% to 28% not 50%. Yes, let’s look at the economy under Reagan. It was pretty good and the top tax rate was 28%. Raising it to 39% will do what? Make it more “fair”?
Obama’s tax plan may not be Socialism but it is redistributing wealth since 40% of wage earners pay no income tax. How can you cut nothing? Calling it wealth redistribution is fair and honest. Calling it a “tax cut” is dishonest.
Posted by: kf | November 1, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am
What’s all the “selfish” bs about. What the hell? Is Obama suposed to move everyone of his relatives that makes less then him, into his home, because of his success. I’m not sticking up for him as much as I am wondering why selfishness became the topic to argue back and forth about. I’m selfish….we all are…no one is excluded. If you say you aren’t….then you’re a selfish liar. Just sitting here reading and posting is being selfish.
Posted by: Joe Leimbach | November 1, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
Drop your worries about socialism, Bush put you deep into it and all the money is going the wrong direction.Now spending to creat jobs is needed so people can have money to spend on products manufactured here. No oney in many hands? No purchases, it’s not rocket science, brownshirts.
If a farmer with a million acres thinks they can spend as much on fertilizer as a farmer with ten acres, guess what?? NO CROPS!!! To keep it going, every one needs to put back according to what is taken out. Only the selfish, greedy, or out and out idiot can’t see where this makes sense.
Most of you don’t know what the heck your tax bracket is right now, and you let some fool who knows what you do pay tell you that something is wrong and you cry with out a reason?
You idiots have been getting charged a graduated tax fee since you were born and didn’t know it. Now someone comes along and tells you that the graduated part has been benfiting the richer more than the poorer, your pockets are empty and you don’t believe the guy? You would rather believe the guy who says all is rosy and your pockets will fill up as soon as the dam at the top over flows and trickle down starts? Damndest bunch of Ma and Pa Kettles I ever did see. LOL You are funny though, I’ll just figure how to rip you off like the neo-cons are and get you to thank me for lightening your pockets.
Posted by: BG14TRUTH | November 1, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am
“Jim receives a pension because he was disabled while protecting your freedoms. So why bash on the man. Have you ever worn a uniform? No, i don’t think so. If you did you would hold your freedoms near and dear. By the way the first people communist execute after taking power is intellectual and teachers. digest that for a while.”
———————————-
Was your comment supposed to be in supsport of people who are not intellectual or teach? The intellectuals are killed for the same reason black slaves were not allowed to read – it is harder to bamboozle and bs someone with a more worldly, informed view. I hope you’re not taking that as a compliment.
dm92
Posted by: dm92 | November 1, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am
Yo BoneSmokey..
Please reference for me the section in the United States Constitution where it guarantees “success”, or “national healthcare”, or “distributing the wealth”?
What America offers is “the pursuit of happiness” – by creating an environment that gets the government out of our way; that keeps the government from interfering with those who are willing to do what it takes to be successful. Yes, of course there will always be small numbers of people who, for reasons of poor health, etc., will need Medicare and other government programs. But we don’t need to do that for everyone! THAT is socialism.
This country was built by people who want to work, and understand that to be successful, it’s going to take enormous effort, not a handout. Success does not arrive because a bloated Federal bureaucracy says it will or provides it for you by taking money from one citizen and giving it to another.
THAT is Socialism, and that is what Obama is preaching. And if you support him then you obviously are also a Socialist. Go ahead, you can admit it. Now take another hit from your bong and get over it.
Good luck with all of that.
Posted by: Jeff Roe | November 1, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Yes, our tax system is already redistributive and we have a lot of problems. But that is not a good reason to vote for someone who will be even worse than the last president, someone who will make the tax system even more redistributive, a tax system that will encourage greed and selfishness rather than use that greed and selfishness to benefit others, a tax system that will move all the wealth to the government elite, giving the few the power to oppress all those who voted for change and those that didn’t.
Open your eyes and minds America, before it is too late. History shows this over and over. Ask the oppressed around the world, they will tell you. The stories of those silenced and killed by tyranny, despotism and hatred. You are still a great nation, don’t throw it all away.
It is not a good reason to vote for a party whose congressional leaders are even more selfish, corrupt and greedy than the republicans could ever dream to be. Most democrats in America today have no representation in government, at least not with the current leaders of the democrat party. Not all congressional democrats are this way but a large and growing number are. Corruption by anyone in government should not be tolerated. Major reform throughout all government is needed. McCain/Palin
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am
Who is John Galt? While Ayn Rand’s philosophy of objectivism captured many minds during the early 60′s, the world has changed considerably since then. Obama is correct when he says it’s OK for the upper income wage earners to pay a little more in taxes. And many of these people agree and support him, infact polls indicate a majority agree. Polarization of the classes has never been a hall mark of a successful society. And that is exactly where this country has been headed since Reagans trickle down philophy took hold of the Republican parties economic policies. It is time to be a little more civil, not just to your neighbors, but to all citizens of the world. That is the only way for America to become great again.
Posted by: Franco | November 1, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am
dm92,
No, i was reminding an intellectual that was putting down a disabled veteran that if you haven’t been there don’t judge.
Posted by: Shane | November 1, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am
Obama joked that maybe he was being called a socialist because he shared his pb&j sandwich.
No, Mr. Obama. What would be socialistic is if you took a friends pb&j sandwich and gave it to someone else who decided he’d rather spend his money on arcade games instead of food.
The danger about you Mr. Obama is that you are either an ignorant rube (something I highly doubt) or a conniving, flim-flam man who won’t play it straight with us.
Take your pick.
Oh – and the real danger about you isn’t you, Sir. It is your minions who go attacking people without you saying a word! It’s like being bitten by someone’s attack dog with the owner mumbling, “Down Shemp” with no heart in it.
I’m betting that if you become the President, I’m going to be forced to have your portrait in my living room (or on my interactive TV, where your minions can watch whether I am being politically correct). Will you be like Chairman Mao? Time will tell. Time will tell.
Posted by: Harry | November 1, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am
THE TERM “HARD EARNED INCOME” IS WHERE WE PART COMPANY.
LESS THAN 10% OF THIS COUNTRY OWN OVER 90% OF THE WEALTH.
MUCH OF THIS WEALTH IS NO EARN BY WORKING BUT BY CLIPPING COUPONS FROM THEIR INHERITED WEALTH. THE WEALTHY HELPED OUT AFTER WW2 WHY NOT NOW? DO WE REALLY NEED AN ARISTOCRACY?
Posted by: robert ricke | November 1, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
It’s this simple folks:
You make a dollar. You “give” a portion to the government.
How much of that “gift” do you get back to make your business or family better?
You don’t make a dollar. The government “gives” you a dollar.
How much of that “gift” did you earn? And how much of it will make your ? business ? of family better?
Touchy feely 1960′s stuff aside: Make or die.
If we are going to succeed as a nation, we need strong people. And we should reward that effort. If such effort falls on their kids, so be it. Their parents certainly earned the right.
But for an Obama-type “redistribution?”
The Soviets tried that too.
That’s why we now call them the Russians.
- Alexander Victor Wolf
New York City
Posted by: Alex Wolf | November 1, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
So why isn’t it selfish that people who don’t work as hard as I work, get to take what I earn?
Obama wants us to all be equal in outcome, but not equal in effort.
Posted by: SuperMommy5 | November 1, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
The truth is, we’ve been redistributing wealth for a while. We pay subsidies to farmers, we bailout large industry, we ‘no bid’ contracts.
Does it make sense to redistribute wealth from the shrinking middle class to industry? It’s basically the difference between supply-side and “demand-side” economics. There might be a place for supply-side economics. When you have a middle-class endangered, though, it’s time for some demand-side economics. Tax cuts for the middle-class are important, and changing the tax code is only ‘redistribution’ if every other tax cut and loophole is also redistribution.
This is a red-herring, and people are reeling it in.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
i am that top 5 % and it makes me sick to hear all of obamas bull… we worked our asses off, started from nothing. Payed our way throgh school, my husband lived out of his car.. blood, sweat and tears… we live in a 3 bedroom 2 bathroom house. We have a second home that is an investment and we employ 50-60 people who we provide with benifits and insurance, but if obama wins, that will be out the door. WE also have a 17 month old that is special needs and needs a lot of special care and a team of people to care for him.. we work very hard to make sure that are kids will be taken care of because it is our responsibility… we dont make enough to pay for peoples laziness and families as we have our own 2 kids. WE donate money to alot of charities without obamas help. It comes down to the way you were raised, i was raised to know right and wrong and to work hard and treat people well…and taking someones money who works hard is wrong
Posted by: vvh | November 1, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
all the babble-do-goop aside, I for one have NEVER worked for a ”poor” person. If anyone here has…..please let me know how that worked for you.
I don’t want ;the government telling me I make too much money and because I’m rich, I’m selfish. Sheeesh.
Get out there and get a frigging job. If you aren’t making enough money…work harder. Plain and simple. Raising taxes only hurts the economy.
Posted by: Cindy | November 1, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
dont believe half the posters like the switz poster.. i am russian and communism/ socialism does not work… we will end up like cuba… everyone is poor … socialised medicine does not work, the goverment will control you… i bet you those posters work for obama.. take my word … it does not work.. and by the way my friend is from sweden their income tax is 90%
Posted by: victoria | November 1, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
and my husband makes 300,000 and we will on his monthly income… if he were to make 430,000 …215,000 would go to taxes..so please tell me how we dont pay enough
Posted by: victoria | November 1, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
Posted by: Joaquim | November 1, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am
Obama fails to mention that raising taxes will result in increased prices. CEOs and businesses treat taxes as an expense – they pass it on to the consumer. EVERYONE WILL PAY MORE.
Do you think Joe the Plumber and Jane the CEO will simply cough up some extra coin out of the goodness of their hearts? No – they will raise prices and “gross up” their salaries to compensate.
Wake up America before it is too late.
Posted by: Jay in PA | November 1, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am
Under Obama’s plan employers get a tax credit for providing employees with health insurance.
It is in everyone’s interest to have a thriving middle-class, something that is shrinking right now.
If you have a small business, employing 50-60 people, for example, how are your sales, lately? I’m betting pretty bad, because everyone’s hanging on to every last dime they have. You might have to lay some people off, because sales are off. Maybe just before Christmas, too.
Are you going to tell your employees that they should suck it up, and go get a job. Oops, they had one.
What would be better is if everyone had some cash in their pockets, and they could spend it. Maybe your sales go up a little, or at least they don’t go down. Maybe you don’t have to lay anyone off before Christmas.
When you give money to the middle-class, they tend to spend it. When you give money to upper-class, they tend to bank it, not helping the economy at all.
That’s the idea. Tax cuts for middle-class should stimulate the economy. What do you think the stimulus package earlier this year was for? Why do you suppose they’re considering another one now? Demand-side economics.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am
Jay in PA: Most businesses can’t simply determine prices on a “cost-plus” system. Pricing is extremely complicated, and the major driver of price depends on competition and what the market will bear.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Personally, I find people that expect something for nothing, greedy and selfish. But that’s just me.
Posted by: Kathy | November 1, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am
is Georges tax breakes really tax breaks when the debt goes through the roof, who is going to pay for this, the good fairy. get real, bush hoped inflation would increase so fast and cover this debt at the cost of the american people. now we all have to pay for his mistakes. and I do not need my health insurance taxed either. It is bad enough that my SS is already taxed, because I choose to work. Enough said, VOTE YOUR CHOICE, JUST VOTE
Posted by: mike | November 1, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
I worked prior a number of jobs prior to joining the military. Traveled the world with the military, and worked a schedule that only a person that was in the military could understand. A bitching sailor is a happy sailor. I was able to retire from the military with two degrees. I now work full-time, raise a family, etc. This morning I am going to vote. I am voting this morning, because it is Saturday, and I am not working. I pay taxes, I have health care, I am not hungry. I take pride in my family, SCUBA dive, fly airplanes, play guitar, I own guns … and would like to keep it that way. Who am I going to vote for? I will let the flag flying in front of my house answer that one.
Posted by: Nevlin | November 1, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
OBAMA’s BROTHER AND AUNT IS LIVING IN POVERTY. OBAMA IS A MILLIONAIRE, WHY DOES HE NOT HELP THEM?
NOW WHO IS SELFISH?
“PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH”
Posted by: arvee | November 1, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
All of Sen.Obama’s friends seem to have been(He disowned all of them except his wife)either anti-American and/or anti White.
Besides,according to Sen.Biden,Sen.Obama will tax everyone(not just corporations) making over $150,000 and increase the Federal tax on your utility bills,and give everyone not working a $500 gift.
Why would you vote for him?
He might increase your taxes if you make over $20,000,the Democratic Congress will agree with anything he proposes in the future.
I trust McCain and Palin not “that one”
Posted by: hal halop | November 1, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
I worked 60 plus hour weeks, took classes at night and worked hard. I now work 50 hour weeks and run my own company on the side in addition I am working weekends to renovate my hosue. I do this for my family.
Now they want to take my hard work and give it to people who did or do not understand what working hard means.
In a liberal world there is no reason to work hard. Where do I get mine? Where is the soup line?
Posted by: JAM | November 1, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am
First of all the right and ability to make money off of our labor is not supposed to be taxed. This is how this country started out. We also printed our own money based on the gold standard and did well as a country. But sneaky, SELFISH POLITICIANS got together and passed the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT IN 1913 THUS CREATING income tax WHICH IS USED TO pay the interest on money this country borrows FORM THE federal reserve.Who is selfish Americans wanting to keep the money made from the sweat of our brow of the politicians who line their pocket with it!!
Posted by: Edsel Pone | November 1, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
I employ 40 people and provide health care. I am in the upper 1% on income. I have never received a handout, nor asked for one, in my life. Never even used student loans. I DID work very hard.
Class envy will always be an emotion politicians can use to mold opinions. Some very famous people used it to their advantage. People like Karl Marx.
Bottom, line…raise my taxes and I decrease employees. Provide incentives to hire, such as tax cuts, I hire more employees and purchase capital equipment, vehicles, etc.
Obama’s followers will never achieve in life by waiting for someone else to “give” it to them.
I remember the words of the actor Burt Reynolds. He said, “I have been rich and I have been poor and believe me, rich is much better”. He said it as a joke, of course. But it is true. You will never appreciate what you have if you don’t get out there and earn it for yourself. Words of wisdom from someone who has been there, done that….
Posted by: Craig | November 1, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
Vote Obama!
I am tired of working hard and would certainly like to enjoy the benefits of some “Shared Wealth”
My household takes in 100K now with my wife and I working, but under Obama, I won’t need to work anymore!!!
Please Vote Obama and let me stay home for a while!!
Thanks!
Posted by: Rick | November 1, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
You anti-Obama folks just don’t get it. Selfishness has ruled and it is time for everyone to have a fair chance!
We work harder than any white collar republican – we deserve more for the work we do supporting and cleaning their offices and howses! Pay should be commesurate with effort – not position!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Here’s the reality people: The Alternative Minimum Tax ALREADY removes almost ALL DEDUCTIONS for people making more than 250K/yr. All those ‘loopholes’ the class-envy sheep keep whining about DO NOT EXIST ANYMORE, PERIOD. But although my husband and I ALREADY PAY over 50% of our income IN LOCAL/STATE/FEDERAL TAXES, I PROMISE YOU that if NOBAMA takes more, the PEOPLE WHO WILL BE HURT ARE THE LANDSCAPERS/PLUMBERS/ELECTRICIANS/RESTAURANT WORKERS/PAINTERS/TRADESMAN/AUTO WORKERS, etc. who depend on people like us for their livlihood. Oh yeah, and the EMPLOYEES OF OUR BUSINESS who depend on US for wages/health insurance/bonuses, etc. THEY WILL SUFFER! Those ‘middle class workers’, NOBAMA pretends to want to help. My husband and I ARE A “WORKING FAMILY”. About sixty hours PER WEEK! Wake UP! Obama’s own AUNT LIVES ILLEGALLY IN THIS COUNTRY IN PUBLIC HOUSING! And he wants MY FAMILY to pay MORE SO OTHERS CAN DO THE SAME? He does not even take care of his OWN FAMILY, but YOU believe he cares about YOU?
Posted by: jean | November 1, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Question: Do you really think that corporations and such will simply accept the lower financial returns that will result from higher taxes? Where do you think they will make up for that loss? They will turn around and push up their prices they charge you and me, so we end up paying for it all anyway. Where’s the help in that?
Posted by: sueb | November 1, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Wow, there sure are a lot of people who earn over $250,000 on this board. Guess rich people have a lot of time on their hands. Either that, or there are a lot of people misrepresenting themselves for McCain. Guess it’s better than pretending you got mugged.
Posted by: indy voter too | November 1, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
My hairdresser told me she’s going to vote for Obama. She said she wanted the “free money”. I told her that, that “free money” would be coming from people like me.
I’m sure not an economist, but I explained that in anticipation of Obama winning and my family’s taxes going up we had already decided what we would need to do to be able to continue to save enough for retirement.
We certainly don’t have a lavish lifestyle (my car is 15 years old) and we certainly don’t consider ourselves rich, even though Obama does.
So here’s our plan:
That trip 10 times a year to the hairdresser where I tip so generously, will be cut back to 7. (I told the hairdresser that if even one other client did what I did that she would loose money.) I’ll touch up my roots in between at home with a $10 wand from CVS.
The Saturday night dinners at our favorite local Italian and Chinese Restaurant, again where we tip generously) would be cut to once per month.
We’d stop the lawnservice man, who comes once a week. My husband will do it….good exercise.
Our very sweet cleaning lady who has lots of kids, we’re not going to be able to continue using her. Our neighbor down the street already stopped.
New clothes? Who needs them…we won’t be going out as much. The jewelry that my husband wanted to buy me for my upcoming big birthday from the local jeweler he’s been buying from for years…I already nixed that.
The trip to Maine in July for 5 days? I cancelled it.
The holiday dinner where we all dress up and take the kids with us for our holiday present….not doing it.
So, maybe those folks who think Obama redistributing wealth is so good haven’t realized that this is going to hurt everyone…but mainly the people he is going to be giving the money to.
Unlike the federal government…my husband and I stick to a budget and we save, save, save. We live below our means. Take away more of our very hard earned money while you’re in office….we’re just going to cut waaay back. And that, Senator Obama is going to hurt the economy even more.
On the otherhand if McCain cuts our taxes, we continue to “support” lots of small businesses, AND we invest more.
Pretty simple isn’t it. Too bad the media hasn’t pointed out what really happens when you raise taxes.
Posted by: SA | November 1, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
OBAMA’s BROTHER AND AUNT IS LIVING IN POVERTY. OBAMA IS A MILLIONAIRE, WHY DOES HE NOT HELP THEM?
NOW WHO IS SELFISH?
“PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH”
The above words were posted earlier. All of you Nobama’s out there might want to think about that. If his aunt doesn’t rate high on the totem pole, what makes you think he gives a crap about you??
Also, another fine fellow just posted he worked hard, etc. and wanted a job with pay equal to his abilities, etc.
My friend, if you are as good as you think you are, get out there and start your own business. Hire employees, and then pay even more taxes…That is what I did and what I do now.
I have met a million people who “think” they are getting the shaft, etc. If you can talk the talk, try getting out there and walk the walk….
One more thing. Give small business a tax break and guess what we do? We hire more employees who do what? Anyone in the class know? Answer: The new employees purchase goods and services and “PAY TAXES”….
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Ricardo: No, actually I’m a business analyst with a manufacturing company, and I know a little about economics, pricing and market trends. Actually, I know a lot.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
If Obama wins – R.I.P America
7/4/1776 – 11/4/2008
Posted by: ACE | November 1, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
SA, nice rant in support of trickle-down economics. Except you’ve missed an important point. If there’s a corresponding tax cut for the middle classes to your tax increase, they will use those services you list more often.
Much as you might not like it, an increase in your taxes will not destroy civilization as we know it.
Posted by: Aengil | November 1, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
The idea that I get to keep “my money” is just ridiculous.
It is not your money. Until you start printing backing a currency it is not your money. We are allowed by the auspices of government to have money – which cost something to print and distrubute – so you can pusrchase goods and services.
Taxes are the cost of living in safe, free society. It is the right wing voodoo economics that has us in the difficulty we are in now.
Posted by: Roy E Pearson | November 1, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Why would anyone want to PAY for healthcare?? Obama will make sure we all have it for free!
I don’t understand you rich people that have enough food and toys to provide for 100 other families that don’t have enough food or toys. Where do you get off thinking the rest of us didn’t put you where you are – without us, you would have nothing too!
Spread the Wealth! VOTE OBAMA!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Jean: People in your community aren’t able to get loans right now. We’re experiencing a credit crisis.
Buying stocks is good, but it’s still supply-side economics. I’m not totally against supply-side economics, but it has to be balanced. The middle class is shrinking, and we need to shore up demand. We can’t just keep giving companies money. Someone, eventually, needs to buy their stuff.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
the number keeps dropping. So far, 250 to 120. My guess is that they will return to the Clinton era number of $75,000 a year (either joint income or individual). My challenge remains:
Show me the country that has taxed itself into prosperity and regulated itself into ultimate freedom, and I’ll live there.
Consider this quote:
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them. ” – guess who?
Posted by: D | November 1, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I think a lot of us forget what taxes are supposed to fund (operative words being “supposed to”). Everyone wants less taxes, but do we want our roads paved, our parks kept clean, a social security check when we retire, etc. I agree that we should be taxes less rather than more, but the true question isn’t just how much taxes we pay, but what those taxes are for, and where that money is going.
With the economy going down the tubes right now, not only are kids not getting Federal grants and scholarships to college, banks are not even giving loans for school. How can we be a strong, intelligent nation if we are not even educating our kids? We can all agree that we need to stimulate the economy, and that we don’t want to redistribute the wealth to help lazy or poor people. But we do need to do something to help the middle class, who is the backbone of the economy. Our middle class has been rapidly shrinking for the past 10 years now, and the divide between rich and poor is getting much greater as we speak.
Congratulations to all who are in that upper 5% income bracket. I am truly happy for you, and you have worked hard and deserve your money. Does that mean that I do not work hard? That because I chose to go into the medical field, and I only make 110k (which in NYC is really not that much) that I do not work as hard as you? I work 60 hours a week and went to school, but I guess I’m not as lucky or smart as you. Or does that mean that I do not deserve to be able to afford health insurance? My out of pocket costs are $200 a month on top of what my company pays, and that is for BC/BS, which is one of the worst plans out there.
I am not asking to redistribute the wealth, I certainly don’t need any hand outs, as I give to charities myself, but I do not think it is fair that there are so many loopholes in tax laws that the wealthy pay virtually nothing in taxes, while I pay over 50% of what I earn. If I am wealthy, I can defer my taxes for years, and then my estate can donate a wing to a hospital or money for a library, and my lifetime of millions of dollars of taxes are just absolved. Nobody wants higher taxes. We just want everyone to pay their share, and not have some great tax lawyer who can scam the country out of what we owe.
I also do believe, though, that we really need to take a look at our national budget, and closely examine where all of our tax dollars go, and for us to determine what is necessary, and what is just waste. There are absolutely millions if not billions of dollars of our hard-earned tax money wasted every year, and we are sinking money into Iraq that is only putting us in further debt. We need to tax people the lowest amount necessary to fund the programs that we absolutely need, and we also should have private consultant groups take a look at how some of these govt tax-funded programs like Medicare and Medicaid are run, as there is millions of dollars that need to be reallocated to make both of those programs work much better. The govt is not a good business, and we should not let them run businesses, nor should we privatize them like private insurance, either.
The answers are not black and white, not simple solutions at all. But the one thing that is evident is that the system we have in place now is quite wasteful and inefficient, and we really need to bring the business model of the govt and of taxation into the 21st century.
Posted by: Ami | November 1, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Selfish! I was so incensed by this comment. If anyone wants to know who is truly selfish check out BO and Biden’s charitable giving on their tax returns. They are HYPOCRITES for calling good, taxpaying citizens SELFISH!
Take care of your own dang family BO and keep your grubby paws off my hard-earned money. It’s my choice whom I give my hard-earned money to. And I won’t choose to give it to tax-filers that have NO income tax liability but will be getting a check from Mr. BO because he wants to “spread the wealth”. More like stealing if you ask me.
You Obamabots have been deceived by a slick salesman. God Help America! Vote McCain/Palin on Tuesday!
Posted by: Chris | November 1, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
“Taxes are the cost of living in safe, free society. It is the right wing voodoo economics that has us in the difficulty we are in now. ”
Well said! It is taxes that make your lives so nice. The more taxes, the nicer the life. And if we spread the wealth, the nicer the life for EVERYONE!!!
I’m voting for Obama
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Capitalism benefits everyone. The pursuit of wealth has raised everyone’s standard of living. The “average American” has a higher standard of living than 88% of the entire world. With that in perspective, many of our country’s rich are funding charities to help those who are truly in need; the people in third world countries. Who looks greedy now? How about working a little harder and donating to charity.
Posted by: aron | November 1, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Oshlockma has an aunt living here illegally in a slum. He has a half brother who is broke….yet Oshlockma doesn’t help either of them with his millions of dollars he has. So why should I feel “selfish” if I don’t want to pay higher taxes and I don’t want to support a socialist system?
Posted by: Nick, New York, NY | November 1, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Mr. Obama is nothing more than a talking suit full of empty promises. His lack of character judgment in those he has chosen to associate with during his life is frightening. Why is it that people can’t see this?
Posted by: Marc | November 1, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Vote for Obama and this is what we get:
No more dangerous guns! Hunter’s feel safe, we won’t take your single shot bolt action rifle away – maybe we’ll GIVE everyone in the country one – the way the 2nd amendment meant it too be.
Free Healthcare for all! Whatever higher tax might come would, in reality, be small and the quality of life would improve for all.
No more Crime! When everyone has enough food in their bellies and a roof over their head, crime will disappear.
An economy that WORKS! Once everyone is spending, and everyone will because everyone will have money, the economy will soar!
Government Cleanup! We need these selfish non-representing officials out of office and make the government ours again!
Everyone complains about pork spending – hey, did you ever ask where that money goes??? into your local communities and into your pocket… without pork on bills, most of your income would disappear since these pork projects pay YOU! Are YOU stupid? No? – then vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
craig, the number of employees a business has is generally in proportion to the demand for their business. No-one hires extra employees to sit around doing nothing.
If a business has enough employees to meet demand and you give them a tax cut, they don’t hire more employees. They pocket the extra profit.
Increasing demand may allow them to hire additional employees though.
Now I’m sure you’re reading this and thinking “yes, but…” and that brings me on to the point.
The point I’m making here is not that it’s “tax breaks for businesses bad!” or “tax breaks for the middle class good!”. The point I’m making is just that it’s not as simple as that.
Your point might be that you think most businesses are in a position where the demand is there and they lack the funds to expand right now, in which case a tax cut for them could help. Someone disagreeing with you might say that they think it’s the demand, not the funds, that are lacking for expansion, in which case a tax cut for the consumer would be more beneficial.
But either way, it’s just not as simple as ‘tax cuts for businesses good, tax cuts for consumers bad!’ or vice versa.
Posted by: Aengil | November 1, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
And by the way, it was McCain who said he wants to bail out people who signed bad mortgages and can’t afford to pay them. So he wants to use your tax dollars to bail out people who were stupid enough to sign their name to a bad mortgage, like interest only or $0 down variable rate mortgages, and we are supposed to foot the bill. Is that not rewarding and bailing out people who have made stupid choices? Please don’t just cry about the evil banks, because you don’t have to sign anything, and you should never listen to anyone promising you anything that you don’t believe to be 100% true.
Posted by: Ami | November 1, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
interesting comments from many “concerned”
rich folks
companies have many more oppertunities to take decuctions on their taxes then do individuals
why not check out how much tax is being paid by the forbes 500 corporations in a comparison ratio to a small business that is making less then one million in gross revenues
times are tough and the trickle down effect is being felt by us all and we all must make adjustments in our lifestyles to survive
don’t confuse being rich to being comfortable there is a huge difference
vote for the person whom you percieve will do the best job for the country which means ALL OF US!!!!
pmktwo
Posted by: pmktwo | November 1, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I don’t make $150,000 a year and probably never will. I am a teacher and my wife is a school psychologist. Together we don’t make $150,000. But we each make our choices and know what we’ll make going into a profession. Redistribution of wealth is Marxist and has never succeeded anywhere in the world. When you take away the incentive to have more and succeed people cease to take risk to invest. If the individual has the same whether he sits on his butt and collects from the government or goes out and works hard far too many will sit on their butts. The guy who owns the great seats at the OKC Thunder games earned his money and is entitled to it. It is his he earned it and the government has no rational reason to give it to me. Sen. Obama doesn’t understand that a little greed made this country great.
Posted by: Sparky | November 1, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Selfish, OMG just one take a look at the charitable donations made by Obama and Biden to poor and needy I think that they are playing the King Midas game. The man shoots off his foot everytime he opens his mouth not Biden , Obama he be da liar of da year lol
Posted by: spudder | November 1, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
You know I don’t know when Obama decided he wanted to make a virtue out of theft and greed.
Posted by: bb | November 1, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Ami,I know your remarks are well intended. You are incorrect about all the “loopholes”.
your comments:
I am not asking to redistribute the wealth, I certainly don’t need any hand outs, as I give to charities myself, but I do not think it is fair that there are so many loopholes in tax laws that the wealthy pay virtually nothing in taxes, while I pay over 50% of what I earn.
Here is the problem. Yes Ami, the truly wealthy have loopholes. John Kerry’s wife paid less in Federal Income tax than my 29 year old son. Yet she is worth $700 million. Wanna know how she did it? Her money is in tax free municipal bonds.
Obama gives the illusion that if you earn over $150K or $200K, or whatever it is,(his target keeps moving) you are “rich”. This is not true. People earning in the $250K to $1 million do not have any more loopholes than Joe Sixpack. In fact, low wage earners with children already get earned income credits. This is nothing more than income redistribution. You don’t even have to have tax liability in order to get a check. Also, with the alternative min. tax, we receive “fewer” breaks than lower income brackets. I am telling you the truth.
If Obama really wants to tax the wealthy, he should initiate a “wealth” tax. It would not depend on what you earn in a year. Rather, it would be based on your total “wealth”. I am against such a plan but it would then eliminate the “loopholes” of which you speak about.
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
To Obama for Change with
“”Taxes are the cost of living in safe, free society. It is the right wing voodoo economics that has us in the difficulty we are in now. ”
Well said! It is taxes that make your lives so nice. The more taxes, the nicer the life. And if we spread the wealth, the nicer the life for EVERYONE!!!”
So – let me earn. You sit back. I get taxed. You benefit??
Can I get you a cool drink while you lounge on the sofa while I’m at it?
Go get a spine and go earn your own. THEN you will also complain when the Gov tries to take what you have EARNED. There are other organisms that live off of others in this world: They are called parasites and leeches.
Remember: Originally taxes were only for national defence and for insuring interstate commerce. NOT welfare. That’s a democratic invention. And a recent one at that.
- Alexander
New York City
Posted by: Alex Wolf | November 1, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Incorporate a “flat” or “fair” tax system and we wouldn’t have to listen to these wandering diatribes!!
Posted by: DAB | November 1, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
To be considered selfish because we work hard and are responsible is just TOO MUCH!!!!!
Your post Posted by: Aengil | Nov 1, 2008 8:13:35 AM describes my husband and I exactly.
I have also had conversations this past week in regard to services that we will stop.
Obviously economics 101 was not a popular class in school….
Posted by: sausen | November 1, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
America is becoming very unhealthy when the desire to preserve the fruits of one’s own labor can successfully be characterized by those who wish to steal it as ‘selfishness’.
Real greed lies in the taking of that unearned money. Obama just professed his greed. Those who cheer him share his greed. Not that McCain is any better, really. He hasn’t been advocating a repeal of the 16th Amendment, or anything positive like that.
I’m voting for Bob Barr. Obama or McCain will crush what’s left of this economy.
Posted by: Selfless Greedies | November 1, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
“The point is…when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care…Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services…”
I work generally 48 hrs a week and have normal expenses. Obama’s programs want to give more to the bottom rung. Let me tell you about those people because I live near it and see it…
They can already go to college..for free. While I have student loans. They have money in their pocket because its a handout given to them…so they don’t have to work 48 hrs a week. They get their housing paid for, while I struggle to pay rent…While working people keep their thermostats low to avoid getting slammed on heating bills, they crank their heat and leave the windows and doors open because its paid for. On the 1st of the month when they get their ‘check’ from the gov’t., they are in Walmart buying big screen tvs, blueray players, swingsets for their kids and all kinds of goodies I can’t afford but have to save for…
And the healthcare?? My husband is in the healthcare field..they use their ‘free’ healthcare from the government like this: free ambulance rides used as taxi rides to get from one side of the city to another. Their mysterious illness leaves when the doors open to the hospital and they jump out and leave; they drop their drunk friends off in the er after a night of partying to get fluids and a waitress to bring them meals while they sober up and take up a bed/space for someone else who really needs it; the women don’t even know when they are pregnant, how it happened and can’t even account for how many ‘free’ abortions the gov’t paid for them (one woman had 17!).
So under Obama, we are going to increase this nonsense so that maybe I will benefit???
NO THANKS. I will work hard, I will continue to pay my bills and take on another job if I have to. And eventually I will make it. That is what this country is about. That is why my grandparents came here. There is no crime in being wealthy. We all aspire to be that. And the wealthy are already taxed to death and give away huge sums of their money to charity and community the way they see fit. The government shouldn’t decide how to do it. For those who need it, there are already programs for them in place. People need to stop taking in Obama’s BS that everything will change. Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and keep going. There are better days ahead. No politician can change your life.
Posted by: lucylinc | November 1, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Alex: “So – let me earn. You sit back. I get taxed. You benefit??Can I get you a cool drink while you lounge on the sofa while I’m at it you slacker?…. There are other organisms that live off of others in this world: They are called parasites and leeches.”
I work, you work. We both get the minimum basics required to live and you get a safe happy life. No, no thanks on the drink – I have my own :) And if you think about it, isn’t EVERYTHING alive a ‘parasite’ in some respect – everything needs something else to survive and if YOU have something else – well, yes, I will take it…
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Regardless if it’s selfish or not – since when is selfishness punishable by law?
Posted by: jbc | November 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Aengil, you comment:
craig, the number of employees a business has is generally in proportion to the demand for their business. No-one hires extra employees to sit around doing nothing.
Thanks for explaining economics to me. Yeah, I realize we don’t hire employees to sit around and do nothing.
Try this idea on for size: Instead of bloating federal govt. even bigger than it already is, why not give huge tax “credits” to small businesses who hire bona fide incremental employees? If the Feds gave small businesses a one year $20,000 tax credit for hiring extra employees, (even it not really needed), these people would be put to work. They would purchase consumer goods and the Govt. would have created another taxpayer. I am not saying it is “THE” correct idea. It is “ONE” idea. I would certainly hire more people and bet on the come. Use the credit to create jobs instead of just increasing the size of the fed govt.
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
The fact that they are talking about doing another stimulus package so soon is why it is better to stimulate economic growth by lowering taxes for business and those that create jobs. (A tax cut for the middle-class would be ok too.) The middle-class and below will make more and there will be more jobs available to them. They would also have more opportunities to move up to upper income brackets. This is actually a permanent stimulus package for all, not one that has little short-term to no effect.
Combine this with wasteful government spending cuts and fiscal responsibility and the economy would probably grow too fast, get out of control, which then is the only reason to ever increase taxes, if you want to slow the economy down.
The tax cuts in Obama’s plan are not enough. They will actually ensure the middle-class stay that way. You could never increase upper income taxes and business taxes enough to ever provide the middle-class enough relief to move up to higher incomes. The more you raise taxes, the more the economy recesses. The unemployment rate will skyrocket. When you were all done with the experiment everyone would be in the lower income brackets, except for the government elite. When the economy slows, everyone will go down with it.
“Supply side” is proven to provide more economic and job growth than so called demand-side, especially when demand-side causes the economy to slow down causing the middle-class and below to make less and lose jobs.
This is what happens everywhere redistribution is tried, most European countries, the Soviet Union, Russia, Cuba, Venezuela and on and on. The more aggressive the redistribution scheme the more freedoms are lost, the more oppressive the government and the more disparity between rich and poor. Again global history proves this over and over.
Economics is a complex system, if you open and allow your mind to learn and study it you will understand the cause and effects and the unintended consequences that any seemingly small change will do. You may have to be willing to unlearn some of the things you were taught in school as well. Some of the class warfare indoctrination will have to be excised. We are all equal after all, it does not matter what class you are in. We are all in this economy together. If you run a business you will understand even more.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
EARLY VOTE – IT IS A BEAUTIFUL DAY!!
Obama will save this country. End the wars. Stop the crime and government abuses. Free Healthcare. Take guns off the street. Put food on your table. Fix the economy.
You can spend your own money and improve your house but if WE spend the money to improve the communities YOUR house will also be improved.
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
I just heard that the “rich” according to Bill Richardson is now anyone making $120,000. So, you selfish school teachers,military retirees, and state employees watch out. The Dems are coming after your hard earned money and retirement.
Posted by: penny | November 1, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Some how people believe that the government can make better use of the last dollar that you earned better you can, e.g. saving for college, home, retirement, investment in their business. This is exactly the implication of raising taxes on anyone. It is easily estimated that when your tax dollars “trickle through” the government bureaucracies the inefficiency loss is at least 30% compared to money flowing through corporations, small business and individuals. Do you really think that the government can make better use of your last dollar than you can?
It is ultimately everyone that pays the taxes that corporations pay. Leaders in many other countries actually understand this. This is why they have a much lower tax burdens on corporations so there companies can attract investment and be more competitive in the global economy. Some how most basic economic realities and reasoning is beyond most democrats and most leftists.
Actually, I’ll take that back. They do understand this but if they acted like they believed it the would have one less thing to demonize and try to take control and bleed the life out of.
Also, the idea that I will vote for a candidate because I can go to his website and use a calculator to see who going to give me a better tax break is abhorrent to me. We were a country founded on principles not redistributionist handouts. I have heard many middle class folks say they are offended by the idea that they need a handout in the form of a tax rebate check (40% don’t pay taxes). These folks want to be net contributors to our country and protecting our freedoms and not on the dole.
Posted by: Roger Corbin | November 1, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
This is the new tone? Calling American citizens selfish? I can’t help but think what the response would be if John Mccain called the unemployed lazy!
We are now out of politics and driving a wedge between people. Thanks for the help in propagating the hatred between the American people Barak. Seems like you’re just as good at it as some of your friends.
Posted by: We should all be concerned for America | November 1, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
This is the new tone? Calling American citizens selfish? I can’t help but think what the response would be if John Mccain called the unemployed lazy!
We are now out of politics and driving a wedge between people. Thanks for the help in propagating the hatred between the American people Barak. Seems like you’re just as good at it as some of your friends.
Posted by: We should all be concerned for America | November 1, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
ABC’s Charlie “Look down my nose on Palin” Gibson makes several million a year. If Obama gets elected,suppose Charlie will selfishly look for tax loopholes?
Posted by: LDC | November 1, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
John Mccain called the unemployed lazy!
Hey, if the economy $ucks this bad, its not the fault of the unemployed!
Vote Obama to get the economy going again and get us all back to work!
What is a little money when it will bring peace and harmony to this country!
Be American and Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Craig: Good idea.
From the Obama website under Small Business:
Barack’s plan applies to the net income that a small business owner takes home, not gross revenue. 98 percent of American small businesses make less than $250,000 in net income — and virtually all of them would get a tax cut under Barack’s plan.
NOTE: $250K applies to NET, not GROSS Sales.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Dear Retired old guy: I mistakenly named you in my post. I was actually replying to the one underneath your (by something called “Dark”). I like your story. Anyway, my post was expressing skepticism over the notion that most wealth is inherited, and even if that happens to be the case, which I doubt, work is needed to maintain it. I liked your story.
Posted by: Gary Roseman | November 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Well, we no longer have to work or do anything: Obama will solve all our problems.
Obama will pay our mortgage
Fill our gas tanks
and put food on the table
He will provide new closthes and cars for everyone.
Hey Obama walks on water!! He makes manure taste good!!
The Messiah has arrived., Lol.
Posted by: Trump Bryant | November 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Where can we get a “I AM SELFISH” tshirt?
Denver, NC
Posted by: sausen | November 1, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
I am a bit confused. I have read several comments here that indicate that these individuals are paying 50% of their income to taxes. Oh wait, I think they are confused. There are other deductions besides taxes being taken out of your check. Social Security and medicare are not taxes. When I look at my check and count all the deductions, well then I am having around 40% taken out…part of that is health care and social security. You can not count that as taxes. Right now those over 250,000 are paying 33%.(on average) Obama is proposing an increase of 3% to raise it to the 36%. I do not believe that those of you thinking Obama is going to give us poor working people al your money are doing your homework. I do not know if you have noticed…we have a huge deficit. I don’t want to pay taxes, but who in the hell is going to pay for it? I think we are going to have to suck it up boys and girls. I don’t want a hand out, I work…I don’t make 250,000 a year, but I realize I may have to pay taxes to do my share to fix what greedy folks have screwed up. In fact I am a single mother making 50,000 a year..and I pay all of my own bills and pay taxes…wow, what a concept.
Posted by: Confused | November 1, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Quick question. Since we all could pay more than we owe in income taxes every year, has Obama and his following given more to the IRS than what he was required to do? I’d like to see a study over every “tax more” democrat and see if they themselves have put thier money where thier mouth is. My guess, not a single one. We’ve already seen that they give very little to charity. I think Biden gave less than 1% one year. Of course, no media would dare let that become public.
Posted by: Steve | November 1, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Craig,
I just happened upon your comments. I am a 57 year old, substitute schoolteacher, and former tax accountant in West Virginia. I left full-time employment because I got tired of working without seeing any benefit of the extra money. If things continue as they are in America, I imagine many will come to the same conclusion, perhaps bringing to conclusion the great American experiment in free enterprise. My husband has worked in highway maintenance for 35 years. We make far less than $250,000 per year. However, we are still supporters of McCain. Why, because we have common sense. By your statements, you appear to be a very successful businessman so that I would expect you to be able to understand this concept.
If Obama adds more taxes on the successful business people like yourself, you are going to add that tax expense to the cost of doing business. Thus, it passes to the consumers with no effect on you at present. We’ll see a little later in this writing how I think it will affect you. At first, it will be strongly felt by people like my mother who worked many years in the school system to retire on $284 per month (before her insurance premium is deducted)with the pension being raised $9 one time in 17 years and is now $293 per month. She also receives about $600 from social security. This is her entire income. Her savings for emergencies is about $1000. Her home is a 1979 mobile home which she hopes will continue to hold up until her passing. She speaks often of how blessed she is. Being born in 1927, she grew up during the depression years and sees now as the most prosperous of her days. Tax increases passed on by businesses and utilities greatly affect her standard of living.
Coal miners in WV nearly all drive (on the back roads)2 hours or more to work each day. Many work six days per week. They buy fuel to get to work. That fuel price will greatly increase when taxes are increased. Again, the standard of living for these miners and their families goes down drastically.
Now, for how this affects you. Without you raising the wages of your employees, how can they continue to buy your products or services?
The prosperity we have enjoyed as a result of the Clinton policies was purchased with credit cards. Our parents didn’t live foolishly as their children have. We are now seeing the end result of this credit craze. The crash came even sooner than I predicted.
When the bailout was front page news, my sister said to me. This is exactly what you have been telling us for years would happen.
Common sense tells me that you can’t spend more than you make and expect to stay solvent.
Neither can we tax ourselves into prosperity. Charity and generosity to help the poor must come from those who have it in their means to give it freely after they have earned it freely. Our form of government can never succeed by forcing people to do what they do not want to do.
BTW, I have a life in Christ.
Judy
Posted by: Judy | November 1, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Dear Dave, Thanks, buddy, but I have read the Constitution and I know that wealth, whether inherited or generated, is to be protected. Property rights go and then next on the list if the rest of what we consider human rights. My comment was to express skepticism over another post, which I had mistakenly attributed to “Old retired guy.” The post to which I was replying said that most wealth was inherited. I doubt that is the case but inherited wealth, like all wealth, requires work to maintain.
I am perplexed that my posts were taken as some kind of leftist support. I am currently in a country that disregarded property rights and has only recently, with difficulty, begun the reinstatement of these rights and other human rights. The suffering has been enormous.
This BHO character and his minions are truly dangerous to liberty.
Posted by: Gary Roseman | November 1, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
CCK:
Barack’s plan applies to the net income that a small business owner takes home, not gross revenue. 98 percent of American small businesses make less than $250,000 in net income — and virtually all of them would get a tax cut under Barack’s plan.
Yes, CCK, I understand very well it is net income, not gross. And I earn well above that amount. When Joe Biden gives more than $900 to charity, I will let him counsel me on my giving. Until then, he can buzz off.
CCK, most people do not realize that most small businesses are actually LLCs , not corporations. They pay a high self employment tax and file a profit and loss schedule which flows to their individual 1040 tax return. So, the individual is taxed on the profits of the company. They do not pay corporate tax. Believe me when I tell you I am constantly thinking of ways to grow my business. Some people have written that we do not hire extra people without demand. True sometimes. Sometimes you hire extra salespeople in order to stimulate revenues.
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Taxes will rise no matter which candidate is elected because the deficit must shrink even though Social Security and Medicare spending will balloon as people age. The real issues now are Supreme Court appointments (6 of the 9 are 70 or older) and security (enemies:Iran is close to a nuclear bomb, a disintegrating Pakistan has it; threats – a rising, pissed-off Russia and an ambitious China) Make your choice wisely!
Posted by: concernedinNY | November 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Taxes will rise no matter which candidate is elected because the deficit must shrink even though Social Security and Medicare spending will balloon as people age. The real issues now are Supreme Court appointments (6 of the 9 are 70 or older) and security (enemies:Iran is close to a nuclear bomb, a disintegrating Pakistan has it; threats – a rising, pissed-off Russia and an ambitious China) Make your choice wisely!
Posted by: concernedinNY | November 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Obama’s idea of government is for the people to work for the government and for the government to distribute the money as they see fit. Mccain’s idea of government is for the government to work for the people and manage and govern to ensure a fair and safe and protected playing field while the people live and strive to reach their dreams.
One wants us to work for the government. The other wants governement to work for us. I always felt that government was there to work for the people and not the other way around so I will vote Mccain in a few days.
Posted by: James | November 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Vote Obama
Elect Obama. Lets Spread the Wealth for one generation. Once each person from that generation has graduated college and can make a living on their own and pay for their childrens’ college, well, then we go back to voting republican again!
Level the playing field!!
Vote Obama
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Folks, PLEASE LOOK AT HOW NOBAMA LIVES. It doesn’t mean a damn what someone says! You have to look at what they DO. Are we just stupid! Nobama does NOT give of his own personal wealth! I give 13% and make a fraction of what he makes. He give LESS THAN 1%. So he does NOT believe in giving. What he does believe in is CONTROLLING the wealth of others. Now whey would that be???? Could it be POWER..Power to take and POWER to give! This is a no brainer!!!!! RUN TO VOTE FOR MCCAIN! You may not love him but you better FEAR Nobama!
Posted by: Cherintex | November 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
To Joe Sestak, D-Pa- I see Obama’s aunt is living in the country illegally and on public assistance. It very much appears that Obama hasn’t spread his wealth to her. What do you observe? Is Obama waiting for you and me to buck up more public assistance to his illegal immigrant aunt before he even takes care of his own family? Why you and me first? Family reunification doesn’t appear to be the issue, she is in Boston and he is in Chicago. Why is it so easy for you and Obama to ask me for more money to pay for his illegal public assistance aunt and everyone’s aunt when he has the means and blood relationship to do it himself, and he won’t, and the government won’t even eject her? I can’t afford it Joe. Obama is a millionaire and his own aunt is an illegal immigrant on public assistance. I can’t afford more of this, pay more, do nothing B.S., Joe. There is an end to how much I have to give, and you have just found where that end is. Do you hear me? This is a sick, sick situation. My brother in law did not have his student visa renewed. He paid his own freight while he was here, and now he has a very good job in Spain. Now he can’t even get a tourist visa to visit his neice and nephew and other family members here. Will you help my brother in law to get a visitor visa so he can come to the USA to visit his family and pour some Spanish money into our economy during his visit instead of asking me for more money to support Obama’s illegal immigrant public assitance siphoning aunt? Well? It ain’t George Bush’s fault, this one, Joe. It’s Obama’s, 100%. And I’m sick of it, Joe. Have Obama take care of his aunt so you weak politicians won’t stick me with the bill like you did on that criminal wall street bailout because you can’t say no for me. Some representatives of the people you are. I moved my family into a 600 square foot, 1 bedroom condo when I lost my job. I didn’t declare bankruptcy or ask the government for a bailout. Scoundrels!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get off your asses and stop asking for more money like beggars. Cut spending, like I have to.
Posted by: pat k | November 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Dear Confused,
Social security and medicare are taxes. They’re called payroll taxes. And not only do you pay them, your employer also pays on your behalf. That’s money they can’t put in your pocket because the government takes it and puts it in a general fund to spend on whatever they want. Then social security and medicare are governed by arbitrary rules that can be changed any time the government feels like it. If you trust the government to take care of you – fine – give them as much of your money to care for as you like. I don’t trust them a bit. I’ve never heard of a truer oxymoron than government responsibility.
Posted by: Erica | November 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
“Posted by: xiu | Oct 31, 2008 10:42:11 PM
Many of you here are commenting on how much (or how little) Obama and Biden have (or have not) contributed to charities. Just how many of you really know what they have given? Where exactly are you getting your information from? ”
Xiu, I’m getting my information from the Tax return information that Biden and Obama made public. Don’t take my word for what they gave to charity. Take their word.
search on Obama tax returns charity.
Bieden tax returns charity.
You can find it in 15 seconds.
Posted by: Fred | November 1, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Law Prof Paul Caron has examined the tax returns released by Barack Obama today for the years 2000 to 2006. You can read the returns over at his blog.
” What is surprising, given the recent controversy over Obama’s membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ, is how little the Obamas apparently gave to charity — well short of the biblical 10% tithe for all seven years. In two of the years, the Obamas gave far less than 1% of their income to charity; in three of the years, they gave around 1% of their income to charity.”
Biden gave even less.
Posted by: Fred | November 1, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
confused,
50% taxation is a commonly quoted figure and it is not far off the mark. What you are not counting is all the other taxes you pay every day. Property tax, vehicle tax, sales tax gas tax, liquor tax, taxes in all your bills, taxes on airline tickets. Taxes on parking, taxes on concert tickets, restaraunt tax, hotel tax, the list goes on and on and on and on and on . . . .
Posted by: Paul | November 1, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Craig, your self-employment tax is the extra 7.5% that you pay into Social Security. If you worked for an individual company, you wouldn’t pay this because your employer pays that 7.5 percent. But it’s not taxes, it goes right to Social Security.
I don’t know your accounting, so I don’t know if it would benefit you to incorporate, plus you would still get all the protection benefits of an LLC, but I will say this: the website specifies small businesses, not small corporations. As an LLC, you have a tax status as an LLC, just like I do as a sole-proprietor.
And this isn’t about giving. It’s about stimulating and growing the middle-class.
Posted by: CCK from PA | November 1, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Obama or McCain, the economy will return when orderly financial market to return. Sounds simple but is proving to be quite difficult. It really has nothing to do with Bush economics.
However, I do feel that the Community Reinvestment Act is the root of our economic troubles. Certain concessions were made to get the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act passes. Note: Gramm-Leach-Bliley repealed some of the Glass-Steagall Act in an effort to help US banks become more competitive globally and avoid the future potential of our financial markets being over taken by foreign interests. Back to the CRA, it forced banks to lend money on similar terms and rates for risky and healthy borrowers. As simple lesson in Risk vs Return shows why this distorts credit markets. Securitization and conduits exacerbated the problem and their use can be explained by the banks trying to protect themselves and depositors from these poor risk vs return assets. Also, regulation could not keep up with financial innovation and republican law makers kept their mouth shut for fear of crashing the party of affordable housing and the “American Dream.” Of course there were many other parties that contributed to and multiplied the problem like the rating agencies, under qualified borrowers, and greedy investors.
Looking back at this problem, without the changes to the CRA, we could have avoided this whole mess. This is a great example of how social programs can hurt everyone.
Posted by: aron | November 1, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Selfish? Obama’s own Aunt is an illegal alien who was ordered to be deported from the U.S., she is living on the dole on the taxpayer’s dime! We the taxpayers get to pay for her rent, even though she has ignored a deportation order for years?! And Obama thinks taxpayers who are fed up with our money being taken away and wasted on criminals is selfish? WOW
Posted by: W | November 1, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
As with all of the Messiah’s comments, this “selfishness” comment is absurd. Joe Biden has earned over 2.5 million dollars in the past couple of years but only $3600. of it went to charity. I give more than that in change cans at convenience stores. The difference here is, I make under 30k a year. Obama’s tax plan will not only prevent job growth, it will promote lay offs.
I asked a local business man who earns about 700k, what will happen to your business with Obama’s tax plan? His reply; “If I don’t go out of business, I will have to reduce my workforce by half”.
Remember, Robin Hood was a criminal!
Posted by: Dale | November 1, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
ccck you are a fraud, pure and simple.
You may think that you can fool some of the useful idiots here that are Obama supporters but you can’t fool all of us.
I am a small business owner. My prices are determined by a) my costs, including raw materials, supplies and tools, labor, TAXES and Licenses, and overhead, b) what the customer is willing to pay (within a range based on their perception of my value which depends on quality and reputation) and competition, and c) what I need as profit in order to survive and continue doing business balanced against the potential of not receiving the contract. Many times I hold my prices and let the “Cheaper” bid succeed. Let these lowballing morons cut each other’s throats.
Those businesses that cut their margins too thin in order to get contracts end up struggling and lowering the prices and profits for the rest of similar businesses. In summary, the mnarketplace, if left unhindered and unhampered by govt., will determine a fair and reasonable value for goods and services.
The solution to success is to do a great job or manufacture the best product that you possibly can, make a reasonable profit, treat your customer fairly, like you want and need his business. Deductions and tax breaks for businesses allow them to be competitive and continue to exist so that they may employ workers who in turn contribute to the economy and the tax base. In reality, businesses do not really pay taxes as they are part of the cost of doing business and, therefore, are calculated into the cost structure and thus, into the final price of the product. The taxes are passed through to the consumer. Anyone that doesn’t understand this is an idiot.
btw Obama is an afro-centric Marxist, period. His associations throughout his life prove, if nothing else, that he has extremely poor judgment. At worst, he is a radical activist with no experience that has used everyone and anything to get as far as he has today. And what has he accomplished? Maybe he was able to help ACORN steal some votes when he represented them as counsel.
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | November 1, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Does anyone care to figure out what the effects of giving everyone citizen $100,000 every seven years would be? This would start now and would replace any future bailout plans. This would be combined with severely decreased government spending and no social security or other entitlement programs. There would be low taxes for all and a streamlined school system with limited government funding.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Obama’s aunt’s life style in the Boston Public Housing where it is reported she is an outstanding citizen is 100% better a life than her life in Kenya!
People should be proud of a government that will provide for the likes of her and should encourage the USA to expand and improve on the lives of EVERYONE and that is where Spread the Wealth really makes sense!
All our lives improve!!
Vote Obama
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I don’t mind paying taxes when they are used appropriately. Over my life I have not seen my taxes used correctly. If everyone thinks that giving to government is giving to charity, why doesn’t the government, keep our taxes low and offer a chritable way to give to it? I would not give to it becuase government is curropt it is political. The money I give does not go to where I think it will go. For Obama to say paying taxes patriotic, he is a blind. He is a socialist and thinks that big brother should have the power to control peoples actions. I believe in free market, and allowing people to decide where they want there money to be spent. I will pay my taxes for protection and saftey. Other than that leave me alone. If I need help I know a thousand good people, not government officials, that would give a helping hand.
Posted by: Brian | November 1, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Judy….Props to WV. They beat us in the Fiesta Bowl… I was there.
Your comments are all logical. I too was employed to 18 years by a very large company. I graduated near the top of my class and have a high IQ. But, I didn’t always play well with others. In business, as employees, a lot of politics are involved. I was actually fired for not being willing to move my family to Venezuela. Without capital and the abiltiy to borrow, I went to another small company and convinced to back me in a business venture. That was 13 years ago. It was the number one best selling job I ever did. I was very independent and it was best I work for myself. Had I stayed employed I am sure I might be a little jaded about many things in life.
It takes a huge amount of discipline to sstart and grow and business, especially without funding. Until you have money, nobody wants to lend you any. That is why I went searching in private sector. My employees are paid way above the average salaries for the area and jobs they perform. I reward performance and loyalty. I have a 29 year old who paid almost $400K in federal income taxes alone last year. I also have a 34 year old employee who earned over $1,000,000. These guys would eat these crybabies alive. They are the true producers. Again, some people can walk the walk and other talk the talk….
BTW, I have a good friend in Charleston. Cheers. Craig
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Reading this exchange is something else. Death and taxes are inevitable. You can either graciously deal with death when it’s your time and be prepared or kick and scream. You can either graciously pay your taxes and ensure that what is done with them is in accord with your believes or kick and scream… and pay them anyhow.
Funnily enough, I have seen mention of socialism and communism… to those, vote on looks, or after-shave of your candidate, cause obviously politics is still a tough subject for you.
And if a woman is having 17 abortions, you can bet that consequently there are 17 less welfare dependent mouths to feed… so embrace that – it’s probably cheaper to abort than to feed. This should be considered an advantange for those selfish ones.
Just vote already and go and invade another country – make it live on tv – US, the greatest entertainment provider worldwide.
Posted by: Itzarella | November 1, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Rosemary:
Obama’s aunt is illegally here!
She is not a 100% model citizen
There are many illegals here. That isn’t going to change by Obama or Mccain. Now or ever.
So lets all get along! Spread the Wealth and improve the lives of EVERYONE!
It isn’t that hard to do and those with money – well, the tax amount we are talking about isn’t going to put a dent in the caviar at the dinner table.
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Obama is a typical hypocritical Democrat; he wants to help everybody…with YOUR MONEY. This battle of ideologies comes down to a very simple question; Do YOU want to be in charge of how YOU spend YOUR money OR should you allow the government to TAKE YOUR money and decide how THEY want to spend YOUR money. I’d rather decide myself, thank you.
Obama has a very generous rhetoric. In his greek column speech in Denver at the convention, he quoted the passage in the Bible that refers to being our brother’s keeper. YET, he has a half-brother living in a hut in Kenya on $20 per year and a recently discovered Aunt (who he refers to affectionately in one of his books) living in a Boston slum for the past 5 years. I don’t see any evidence that the wealthy Obama family has done anything to help his own family. I guess when Obama refers to being “our” brother’s keeper, he means government. Oh, and I wonder if Obama knew that his Aunt has been living in the country ILLEGALLY!
Posted by: Bill C | November 1, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
CCK:
your comments…
Craig, your self-employment tax is the extra 7.5% that you pay into Social Security. If you worked for an individual company, you wouldn’t pay this because your employer pays that 7.5 percent. But it’s not taxes, it goes right to Social Security.
I don’t know your accounting, so I don’t know if it would benefit you to incorporate, plus you would still get all the protection benefits of an LLC, but I will say this: the website specifies small businesses, not small corporations. As an LLC, you have a tax status as an LLC, just like I do as a sole-proprietor.
And this isn’t about giving. It’s about stimulating and growing the middle-class.
CCk, I know very well what I am paying. I am an educated bean counter. I employe tax attorneys and business attorneys. There are reasons why one should and should not incorporate over LLCs. Many very large business are LLCs these days.
Anyway, for whatever it is worth. I am voting for McCain because I trust his integrity much more than Obama or the village idiot Biden. But, I almost hope Obama wins all these whiners will not be able to blame “the man” for keeping them down. BTW, that is a direct quote from Whoopi G.
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
The old story:
“Do YOU want to be in charge of how YOU spend YOUR money OR should you allow the government to TAKE YOUR money and decide how THEY want to spend YOUR money. I’d rather decide myself, thank you.”
Yeah, we here this every election. easy coming from someone with LOTS of money to spend :)
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I really appreciate the spirited debate on economy. I am pro McCain and want to explain why. I started my company when I was 21 years old through loans from family. I paid these loans off and have over the past ten years grown my business. I made mistakes that nearly bankrupted me but learned from them and never looked to the government for help. I make around $100,000 a year and would benefit from Obama’s plan and don’t agree with it at all and will explain why. I have increased my income about every year and put around 50-55 hours a week into work. I am working toward my goal of making more money. Now if I reach my goals over the next few years that means all my hard work and suffering of not making any money in the beginning years means nothing because I am going to be penalized through higher taxes. It is easy to say lets tax people making over $250,000, but you don’t see the hard work and suffering they had to go through to get to that point. Anyone can live the American dream. It is about how much you personally want to sacrafice. When and if Obama gets elected it will send panic through small business and the layoffs could start within a month in order to get employees of the books for 2009. When I asked one fellow bussiness owner “How will you decide who gets laid off?” He said “I am going into the parking lot and see who has Obama-Biden bumper stickers on and they will be the first to go”. He was joking, but be careful what you wish for.
Posted by: Sal | November 1, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Spreading the wealth will not raise all boats! In a freemarket the rich will simply pass the burden on to the comsumer, cut staff, quality, find a loophole, move operations overseas, or worst yet; fold up shop. In the end, what good are the crumbs spread around if you don’t have a job and the cost of living goes up? And could somebody please explain why filtering money through DC, is somehow a virtue?
Posted by: Joe-the-bummer | November 1, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Well, people here we go again. As if the libs in this counrty can’t get enough of your money they want more. Tell ya what! I’ll just get a second job so I can go and pay Hillary’s campaign debt too.While we’re at it, since it is so easy to make ends meet nowadays, I’ll see if I can get my kids to quit school so they can work a real job and help the almighty one and donate thier earnings to help out with education spending.
Doggone it, ran into a snag here. The air pressure is so low on our Dodge Ram 1500, I think my wife is going to have to quit driving it or else she will burn too much gas and the annointed one will get mad at her. wait a minute…. she can walk to work since it is good exercise. It will only take her an extra 6 hours to get there. The boss won’t mind though. Since he is an Obama supporter he’ll make due knowing that with her dedication, It will be raising money to help his children to eat at the Red Lobster on friday night in style while she is walking home.
Plus the extra money we’ll have from not buying gas from those Big oil companies, we can put some of those low wage migrant workers to work on our front lawn to do some landscaping work for us. Seeing as how we are so busy and no longer have the time for it. Isn’t that what our Savior wants anyway….for us to help create jobs for others in the community? Do we get the $3,000 tax credit for each person on thier crew? Cool, now we can afford to buy my granddaughter some new shoes and maybe a new bike too. We’ll only as long as one of those landscapers doesn’t get hurt. I would hate to see my insurance premiums go up if he or she gets hurt slipping on the grass and supposedly twists an ankle or something.
This is taking too long, I gotta goto work my self. I will continue this at lunch , only if Obama says it’s ok for me to send a text message during my break.Wait, are we still allowed them?{breaks}, Oh heck, at least I am still alive, right?
Posted by: doc | November 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I won’t take your money for my basics and don’t count on my hard work to pay for your basics.
Let taxes be a shared responsibility by all Amercians not just a “chosen few”. When I give to a charity, that generousity comes from my heart, not from a commander who arbitrarily decides the extent of my unselfishness.
Posted by: Rebecca | November 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Obama said we live in the greatest country in the history of the World.
He wants to change it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Obama’s tax increases now extends to people making $120,000. Next it will be back down to the $42,000 Obama voted for. The media created this Obama idiot and now the media as we know it today will be irrelevant the day after the vote. Way to cut off the nose spite the face.
Our Democracy was built on the desire to want more by earning it but now will be destroyed by people who want more but will just steal it.
Posted by: t. hill | November 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Obama or McCain will be a one term president. In 2010 the Republicans will get it all back. Nothing will change, then in 2012 they get the white house. Same ol’ song and dance. If the economy is in the hole we can all be poor together, and we can all get in the bread line.
Posted by: mike | November 1, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Everyone should have the basics! Once the basics are covered, then we all have a level playing field.
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Cuba voted for CHANGE in 1959. Obama is as radical and as egotistical as Castro. Americans are ignorant if they think the U.S., even with its faults, isn’t the greatest country in the world. Notice his international supporters? Notice the radicals in the country being quiet? They say nothing because they don’t want to hurt his chances of getting in. This is incredible!
Posted by: dmichele | November 1, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Rich as defined by Democrats…….
Anyone who has a job and does not require some type of government handout.
RICH = Someone who does not partake in our vote buying handout schemes.
Do you have a Job! If you answered yes, then you are rich!
Posted by: Who are the Rich | November 1, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Selfishness? Mr. Obama should start by looking at himself. Let him begin by taking his fat bank account and distributing it to, first, his illegal auntie in Boston, then all the illegals in Boston, then all the poor people in Boston, including me, then all the poor people in the world. Only after he has reduced himself by doing this to the same level of poverty as me may he tax me (and himself) to give the money to the UN to lovingly and fairly distribute (oh fat chance!). The fact is, as long as he sits in his plush mansion and continues to have no worries about food, and gasoline, and mortgage payments, so long will I continue to disregard his call to fix the world with other people’s money. Elitism is the worst selfishness in the world, Obama has lived a long time in the elite class, and he will not be changing that any time soon. I take his charge of selfishness and fling it back in his selfish, Marxist, traitorious face.
Posted by: Gary | November 1, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Like many of you I’m shocked by Obama’s socialism. I was even more shocked when I read this:
INVESTIGATION INTO ANTI-AMERICAN ELEMENTS IN U.S. GOVERNMENT
ANTI-AMERICAN ACTIVITY: Barack Obama’s proposal to raise the tax rate on the top income bracket from 35% to 39% — a shamelessly Socialist redistribution of wealth.
SUMMARY OF RESULTS: Shockingly, we found that many commies, pinkos and subversives with ideas far more radical even than Obama’s had already infiltrated the highest reaches of American government and political philosophy.
ADAM SMITH: Wrote that it’s reasonable for the wealthy to pay taxes at a higher rate than the poor. We were very surprised to find out that the founder of capitalism, who died 28 years before Karl Marx was born, was a dirty, stinking commie.
BILL “HAMMER AND SICKLE” CLINTON: Under Clinton’s evil anti-American reign, the tax rate on the top bracket was the same 39% Obama is proposing, and America suffered through the longest economic expansion in its history.
DWIGHT “BOLSHEVIK” EISENHOWER: Makes Obama look like Gordon Gekko. Under his presidency (with a Republican congress), the U.S. had a 91% top tax rate. Welcome to the collective, Ike.
RICHARD “THE RED” NIXON: Top tax bracket under Nixon’s spread-the-wealth regime: 70%. There was a certain commie-hunter congressman from California in the 1950s who would have liked to have gotten his hands on this pinko.
JOHN MCCAIN: In 2001, voted against lowering the top tax rate from 39% to Bush’s proposed 35%. “Comrade” McCain defended the progressive tax system, denying that it’s Socialism: “When you reach a certain level of comfort, there’s nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.”
CONCLUSION: Suspect many more Americans believe in this commie so-called “progressive tax system.”
RECOMMENDATION: Domestic spying, enhanced interrogations, purges, re-education gulags — to root out such radicals and undesirables. These measures must be taken to ensure pro-American values in the motherland.
Posted by: Witchfinder General | November 1, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
“Nothing is as insufferable to man as freedom”.
Grand Inquisitor, The Brother’s Karamazov.
Posted by: Bruce | November 1, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I think Obama must be confused, or he doesnt understand what words mean.
Did he mean the people who pay nothing and are now looking for an additional handout are Selfish. That seems to be a better definition of Selfish.
I seem to remember Bill Clinton had a number of promises to give the “Middle Class” a tax break that somehow turned into a tax increase.
I guess Obama is trying to appeal to that group of people that fall into the category “You can fool some of the people all of the time”
I do give Obama credit he seems to have picked it up quickly from Slick Willie on how to find the sweetspot in finding fools to vote for him
Posted by: Laughing out Loud | November 1, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
What else would you expect from someone whose income depends on the tax contributions of others.
Posted by: NoGoBO | November 1, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Consider the following:
When the government gave us all “stimulus” checks, the premise that was by returning tax dollars to their original owners so that they could be spent, the economy would be stimulated.
Since those in government seem to recognize that more money in the pockets of those that earn it stimulates the economy, why propose to take more of it in the first place? Isn’t this proposition counterintuitive?
Posted by: Steve | November 1, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Obama for Who?
I’m very glad Mr. Obama wants to help people who are less fortunate than others. If that is the case then let him donate his money to whatever charitable cause he chooses..thant is American. But please..IF he is elected and IF he gets his way on legislation..don’t force me to donate to his newest charitable organization, the Federal Government. I don’t work hard to support someone else, I do it for MY family. That is not selfishness, that is being responsible.
Posted by: Rob | November 1, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Here’s a bit of reality…
Several Oil Drilling contractors are moving all their businesses offshore!
Posted by: betty | November 1, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“Now if I reach my goals over the next few years that means all my hard work and suffering of not making any money in the beginning years means nothing because I am going to be penalized through higher taxes.”
Sorry, but that’s garbage. You’ll still make more money. Say you were earning 250K a year, and you start earning 350K a year. At a tax rate of 35% on that extra 100K, you’d have 65K more. At a tax rate of 39%, you’d have 61K more.
The idea that an extra 61K a year ‘means nothing’ because it’s not 65K is idiotic.
Posted by: Aengil | November 1, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Selfish huh?
Let me be the first. Obama wins, I quit my job and wait for the gravy to run on down the street. I will be delivered from a life of hard work and misery!
I can’t wait. I really can’t wait.
Bet I can want in one hand, and bleed in the other. Pretty sure which hand will fill first, Obama or no.
Posted by: Snowman | November 1, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Harry Singh:
The last time I looked, George Bush wasn’t running for president this year. I do, however, have a question in response to the one that you pose:
What kind of arrogance must Obama be the owner of to impute the Founding Fathers by suggesting the Constitution is flawed in that it provides no means by which the judiciary can consider the issue of wealth redistribution?
Posted by: Steve | November 1, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Lbar said:
Average workers pay 40- 45% in taxes( it is too heavy at the upper end though). Now, when you add up our FICA, Medicare, and state taxes( most states have them), we barely get squat and that adds up to 35 – 40 %. Then when you add-in the money to get medical care and retirement cost and the cost of education( college and trade school are virtually free to Swedes),objectively you can she which working man comes out ahead. It ain’t US !
We can still reject that and I do mostly, but I also realize it is not as cut and try as I have always been told.
Lbar, it is still working in Sweden because the country is smaller with a higher proportion of the population contributing to medical care & retirement.
I don’t have the facts, but believe in the US with a larger proportion of the population not contributing, this Swedish form of socialism will fail here.
Posted by: Lee | November 1, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Obama should lead by example on this issue.
By implying that “we” are selfish and He is different somehow I would expect him to take a vow of poverty, lose the $1,000 suits (give them to the homeless?), turn his book proceeds and fortune over to charity, give his Rolex to Joe the Plumber or Harry the storekeeper and generally tone down his conspicuous consumption.
But, frankly, I think this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black, not a good choice and potentially costly.
Posted by: John Cornelius | November 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
It’s shocking to me how uninformed some of these posts are…this silliness about Obama not saluting the flag or wearing a pin. Vote for whomever you choose but do it for the right reasons. I think McCain is the wrong man for the job, he’s 72, a 4 time cancer survivor and he picked an incompetent VP to take over should something happen to him. That told me all I needed to know about his decision making abilities.
But please do yourself and your family members a favor, don’t debase yourself by further spreading lies or rumors about why you don’t want to vote for Obama.
I do think Obama is the right candidate. I’ve been impressed by his demeanor, his composure, his campaign, his record, his education.
I am grateful this silliness will be over on Tuesday. One way or another, it is imperative that as citizens we start working together. It seems to me only one candidate has that on his agenda.
Posted by: Rosalee | November 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
It wasn’t always like this. The founding fathers of the republic–men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and Alexander Hmailton– were the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched denigrate into Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
Fixed.
Posted by: Bill C | November 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Go ahead, call me selfish. I don’t want to be a slave to the government.
Posted by: Maggie | November 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Here is more reality:
I was in Monterrey, Mexico with manufacturing firm owners that conveyed to me that if Obama’s tax plan goes through and the democrats pending legislation that facilitates unionization goes through, they will be moving to Mexico. One company is from the Chicago area (Obama’s old constituents will lose a few jobs), one is from the Detroit area and one is from Ohio. All are suppliers to the automotive industry. Obama will be great for job creation……in Mexico.
Posted by: Steve | November 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
The playing field is level if you are living in America. Work, have a plan and save. When my son was born, knowing we would send him to college one day, we set aside a little each month. Now he is in college and doing well. After we grow up and leave home most Americans want to be responsible for themselves.
Posted by: Rebecca | November 1, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Selfish? Yeah right selfish cause I don’t want the government to take more of my money? Selfish would be not helping out a neighbor, brother or aunt in need… those in glass houses such as Obama have little room to talk.
Posted by: JW Wilson | November 1, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I am not happy with McCain or Obama. However, Reid, Polosie & Obama scares the poop out of me. McCain, Reid and Polosie combo will slow up our decline into the obbis of socialism. Why do we insist on immatating countries who have lagged behind us for 200 years? This makes no sence to me. The socialist in Europe are thrilled when their unemployment rate dips under 10%. Ours gets above 5% and everyone whines that we are in a ressesion.
Posted by: JDK | November 1, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Boy, the Republican propaganda blather sure has scared you people into believing a lot of ridiculous nonsense… and there’s no arguing with you. It’s scary how ignorant people are… just like George Orwell’s 1984.
Posted by: Amanda | November 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Why do you Socialist Whack-jobs villify Wal-Mart? They pay well, give their employees benefits above most other stores, and every employee I’ve known has told me they love it there.
They also offer us needed products at good prices.
Oh, that’s right, they aren’t UNION!
Free markets scare you guys, don’t they?
Posted by: JoetheOrdinaryGuy | November 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
The problem with Obama’s assertion that “a rising tide lifts all boats” lies in how he wants to raise the water level.
He wants to take the most successful boats, the boatbuilders, and the people who sell fuel to the boats and smash them to pieces and throw the remains into the water to make it rise.
Posted by: John | November 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Obama is all smoke and mirrors! So many questions are left unanswered, so we cannot really know WHO we’re voting for. If there’s NOTHING to HIDE then answers should have been more forthcoming. Obama’s arrogance and ego remind me way too much of another socialist leader in the Western hemisphere, namely Fidel Castro. Just look at that country to see what Obama’s philosophies would lead America toward. GOD FORBID, the country will WAKE UP before next Tuesday’s election. We will get what we ask for!!
Posted by: Jon | November 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
We are in the middle class. We give a much higher percentage (about 15 percent) of our before tax income to charity. This is a MUCH higher percentage than Obama gives to charity. So, WHO is selfish? He is charging media outlets to go to his party in Chicago. He has raised MILLIONS and MILLIONS of dollars in questionable online donations. Private organizations do a much better job of serving the poor and underserved than the government does, so I am glad to hand my money over to these private groups. However, the government wastes our money like crazy, so YES, I will be SELFISH and speak against his tax increases. He originally said that those making under $250,000 would have an increase. In his infomercial, the amount was $200,000. Biden said $150,000 and Richardson said $120,000. We fall below this amount, but ABOVE the $42,000 that he voted upon to raise. Let’s keep the Bush tax cuts (they run out next year), and help our businesses hire more people without cheesy tax credits.
VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN
Thank you.
Posted by: Tess | November 1, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
It’s all really disturbing. Trying to compare the US to any of the European countries that are performing some amount of Govt. backed healthcare doesn’t make sense at all. As someone mentioned Sweden ~ 9M people in the entire country – compared to > 300M in the US.
This is really simple. There is a reason why the US accounts for over 20% of the worlds GPD/Purchasing power. If you would rather the US drop down to the teens/twenties, become inconsequential economically – then you agree with Obama.
Can we afford to become a semi-socialist state where we decide to take care of “everyone”, hard-workers, under-achievers, illegal aliens etc..all equally. Yep, we can….at a very high cost and to change the very way the US works/lives. Is it sustainable – nope.
So I take it would should form a N/SU (North American/South American Union) so we can join at the hip with Canada and Mexico so we can all pool our “regional buying power” because we can no longer compete independently. (Just like the EU)
I’m sorry, is our economic structure perfect? No.. but there isn’t any decrease in people from around the world lining up to live here and participate – I prefer the US as it is.
Posted by: CRL | November 1, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
JDK: “The socialist in Europe are thrilled when their unemployment rate dips under 10%. Ours gets above 5% and everyone whines that we are in a ressesion.”
I call garbage on that.
Unemployment rate here: 6.10%
Unemployment rate in the European Union: 6.70%
They’re not thrilled over there either.
Of course, that’s across the entire European Union. Plenty of European countries have unemployment rates lower than ours:
The UK: 5.70%. The Czech Republic: 4.70%. Ireland: 4.70%. Switzerland: 2.60%. Norway: 2.10%.
Posted by: Aengil | November 1, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Obama Supporters,
If a man comes up to you on the street, points a gun at you, and demands the money you have in your pocket, he is labeled a thief. If caught, he will be thrown in jail, stand trial, and if found guilty, he will do time in prison.
Do you not see that when the government does the same thing to it’s citizens, it is still stealing?
What’s the difference?
In a free republic (which we are), we have a contract with the government.
That contract (the constitution) defines the services the “gummint” will provide for us in return for our taxes. If the government provides services outside that contract, it is breaking the contract and commiting the moral equivalent of stealing.
Most of my fellow consertative’s fury is directed at the fact that we have allowed you libs to expand that contract through judicial fiat by interpreting the constitutuion as a “living document”. Our founders understood the nature of men and government was to always expand the government, the federal bureacacy, laws, and regulations. Their intent was to “bind the government with the chains of the constitution” so that it would not inhibit the market of voluntary transactions between free men.
There is a process for major changes to the contract, it’s called an amendment.
If you Obama supporters want to change the contract, you could get the votes in 75% of the states and pass an amendment to allow redistribution of wealth.
But, you can’t succeed in that fashion. So, you elect libs that pack the courts to re-interpret the contract to allow the socialistic programs the Federal Guvment has taken over in the last 100 years. Social Security, Medicare, reverse discrimination, religion out of the public square, welfare, education, etc.
Then, you refuse to acknowledge the statistical/empirical evidence that every single one of those programs have either failed to improve the sitution for which it was created or made it worse.
We were headed toward bankruptcy with Social Security and Medicare alone, and now we’re bailing out the banks? Have school test scores improved? Are the number of people in poverty less than in the 1960s after billions of “redistributed dollars” to them?
No, because the “Gumment” does nothing well, because it is the true “monopoly” immune to the effects of the marketplace.
We have no choice in the services provided by the government, you will pay for those services regardless of whether you like the service or use the service.
I’m always amused by the libs ranting against the “evil businessmen”. When you use the service of a business, it’s your free choice which one to use, and if you want to pay their price. We have a whole host of government beaurocrats and lawyers watching those businesses to make sure they do not engage in monopolistic practices.
Yet the libs think it wonderful that government is the monopoly provider of Medicare, Medicaid, SS, and education.
I would gladly take responsibility for my SS, Medicare, Medicaid, and education tax dollars to invest them for myself and my family to provide better services than I am getting from the government.
That’s what free people do, and that’s the principle that made the USA the richest, most powerful country in the world in such a short time.
I want my contract enforced, I want lib judges thrown off the bench by impeachment proceedings, and I want the gummint’s hand out of my pocket.
McCain is certainly not my first choice, but at least he acknowledges these basic principles. Palin is our future, because she’s run a business, and understands we have to have cheap energy to grow the economy.
Obama is dangerous because he thinks our contract is in need of being “re-interpreted” so the gummint can steal more of our money to do things not in our contract.
It’s my money, I have a contract, and I want it enforced.
Obama supporters, if you can amend my contract, so be it. But until then, get your damn hand out of my pocket.
There are plenty of social paradises available for your relocation if you want your preferred polices carried out.
Don’t let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.
Posted by: Optimus Maximus | November 1, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
How dare Obama call me “selfish” for not wanting my taxes to go up. I want to keep more of my income so I can continue to donate even more to private charities, something Obama and Biden are apparently not too familiar with. Let’s distinguish between good “selfishness” which allows businesses to flourish and hire and donate, and LAZY selfishness, which thinks other people’s money should be confiscated by government (ultimately at gunpoint) and given to them.
Posted by: Stephen | November 1, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I’ve worked for the same company for 43 year and earn $50,000 to $60,000 per year with overtime and thought I was middle income. Always have paid federal income tax, support medicare and S.S. for our senior citizens in their last few years on earth.And hope they would be good years. But my taken our money and given it to the people that do not work and expect a free ride is wrong.We have unwed mother’s with 3 or more kids and the taxpaper is paying for them, although I don’t like it we most remeber its not the kids fault. But to keep giving for everything for the non worker is getting to be old.
Posted by: Drap1205 | November 1, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Wanta textbook example of selfishness, Mr. Obama? How about YOUR running mate, Joe Biden, giving a measly amount to charity every year? Giving LESS than the average middle class taxpayer, in fact!
OK. Want another example? How about YOU sir, who makes millions each year and yet YOU have a BROTHER who lives in poverty on just $25.00 a month? OR how about your poverty-stricken AUNT in Boston who lives in the projects?
OBAMA is a hypocrite of the highest order. I am sick of limosene liberals telling me that I am selfish if I work hard, make sacrifices, provide fopr my family’s welfare but do not want to pay more TAXES!!!
How about putting YOUR money where YOUR mouth is, Mr. Obama? There is no law against paying more in taxes than you owe. Go ahead sir, step up to the plate and donate!
At the very least you should send a little money to your own family…
SELFISH indeed.
Posted by: U.R. Dreaming | November 1, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Hey Obama for Change: Pay is NOT commensurate with the amount of time put it, or how “hard” you work. Sorry, if you want that you’ll have to leave the country to find it. You will NEVER get paid the same. Why? Because the Obama “demonized” white collar worker is the one who took the opportunity to spend 8-10 years educating him or herself. Then puts him or herself in a “risk” position on a daily basis. The risk involves decision making or money (sometimes personal money). The white collar worker is also in a position to have to endure continuing education, in order to keep their job. Not to mention, many, many in white collar jobs do NOT arrive at work at 9 and leave at 5. I know my husband and I each work, on average, 11 hours a day. When we get home from the office, we each have work to do at home. Can you say the same about yourself? I didn’t think so. That’s why you should not get paid the same. And please don’t think if Obama gets in it will be the lottery pay day for you, because that will be impossible. There is no money available now, and it will be a lllooonnnggg recovery. And Bush’s tax plans will be in place for a while. Besides $500 or whatever you got the last time, will not build wealth for you. Education, saving and investing will.
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Three points:
1) Conservatives give more of their OWN money to charitable causes than liberals do. So who is selfish? Conservatives want to decide for themselves who to help; liberals want to take our money so they (government) can decide who to help because we are too stupid to do that for ourselves.
2) Money funneled through the government has a large percentage taken off the top to pay the high salaries of government employees and the needy get what’s left.
3) There should be no corporate taxes. The money should be taxed when people get it whether high-salaried upper management of big corporations, or shareholders. That way money not paid to people could be used to grow the business, i.e. more jobs. Corporations would flock back to the U.S. if that happened. But liberals will never go for that even though it would be best for the working people because it doesn’t sound fair.
Posted by: JustFacts | November 1, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Obama is wrong wrong on taxes wrong on America’s future. We didnt get here the waelthy country on earth by giving a way prosperity, but by giving an hand to earn prosperity. Goverment is too big, and Now The Terrorists attacked Our embassy, can we trust Obama to keep us safe, I dont think so, they want him to win, they will test him and how many people need to die because he needs to be tested?
Posted by: sickofliberalBS | November 1, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Bill C from NY, its interesting how you were impressed by everything about Obama except any of his plans for the country, oh thats right he doesn’t actually have any plans he made himself, except to tax us some more. That’s right its a tax on the earners in this country because most of the people like you don’t pay any real amount of taxes anyway and you file and get it all back at the end of the year. So that leaves the people who actually go out and extend themselves to make a living, grow a business, provide jobs for slouches like you and pay 3 to 4 times as much in taxes as you.
How about a nice 20 percent flat tax, you pay 20 percent on your salary and I’ll pay 20 percent on mine, that sounds fair and you get to actually pay for some of Obamas plans. What you won’t do that because then you will actually earn less that way? Welcome to the game.
Posted by: Sean L. | November 1, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I don’t mind Nobama sharing his peanut butter and jelly sandwich, or his toys with someone else. What I don’t want him doing is sharing my sandwich or toys without my permission.
A vote for Nobama is a vote for censorship, not to mention nation-wide catastrophy. That man is about as ready to be president as Goose Grease Sharpton.
Posted by: Jeigh Cee | November 1, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
NOW we are selfish, selfish for wanting to take care of our famlies first?
Charity begins at home.
Obama is wrong..Wrong on taxes- wrong on America’s future. We didnt become the greatest country on earth by out prosperity, but by giving a to earn prosperity.
Goverment is too big, too many people on govt payroll, cut waste improve productivity.
Now The Terrorists attacked Today Our embassy, 13 people died.
Can we trust Obama to keep us safe?
I dont think so, the terorists want him to win, they will test him and how many people need to die because he needs to be tested?
Its not too late, if Obama is half the man he says, he can come back in 4 years, but not now.
Posted by: sickofliberalBS | November 1, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Nice try Caroline. Obama has that “anyone” making less than $250,000 per year will not see an increase in their taxes. Did he mean any person (individual) or any family (two combined incomes)? This has never been clarified.
Then, Obama dropped that amount to $200,000 per year again without specifying individual or combined family income.
Next, Joe Biden drops the amount to $150,000.
Finally Obama surrogate Bill Richardson drops it to $120,000.
Which amount is it? What does Obama mean by “anyone?” Individual or combined family income?
These are the great unaswered questions. He has left it purposely ambiguous so that he will have the wiggle-room to get out of keeping his promises!
Obama the new breed of politician or just plain dishonest like the rest?
Posted by: U.R. Dreaming | November 1, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Sean L.:
How about a nice 20 percent flat tax, you pay 20 percent on your salary and I’ll pay 20 percent on mine, that sounds fair and you get to actually pay for some of Obamas plans. What you won’t do that because then you will actually earn less that way? Welcome to the game
That is great man!! If we had a plan like that we could actually have a vote about something substantive, instead of all this class envy crap.
I hope all you Obama lovers cherish your $$$checks you are looking forward to receiving. I hope I am dead and gone before the USA finally makes it to third world status……
Posted by: craig | November 1, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
sickofliberalBS, your bullet number three is wrong. The Constitution allows tax on profit, and since only a corporation can make a profit they are the ones that are to be taxed, not the individual citizens. We should not be paying ANY tax, since our labor is traded for money its not profit. I work and toil all day to earn money to pay for those things I cannot do for myself or do not wish to do. The harder and longer you work, the more of your life you barter for money, and can then buy what you wish for the part of your life you have to enjoy.
Posted by: Sean L. | November 1, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
NOW we are selfish?, Selfish for wanting to take care of our famlies first? Sorry Goverment is too big, clean the GOVT up first
Make it efficient and then tell me you need more from me but otherwise right now the US Govt is inefficient.
Charity begins at home.
Obama is wrong..Wrong on taxes- wrong on America’s future. We didnt become the greatest country on earth by handing out prosperity, but by giving a hand to earn prosperity.
Goverment is too big, too many people on the Govt payroll, cut waste improve productivity.
Now The Terrorists attacked Today Our embassy, 13 people died.
Can we trust Obama to keep us safe?
I don’t think so, the terorists want him to win, they will test him and how many people need to die because he needs to be tested?
Its not too late, if Obama is half the man he says, he can come back in 4 years, but not now.
Posted by: sickofliberalBS | November 1, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
I’d just for a minute like an Obama supprter to answer one thing for me. I live in Chicago. Obama, Oprah, Daley, Emanuel, Jackson, Farrakhan, Wright, Fleger, Ayers, Duncan and more, live in Chicago too. If their programs work so well, why is Chicago the MURDER CAPITAL of the US, and why is our education system 49 out 50 in large metro areas. If Obama and crew are SO GOOD at what they do, then why isn’t Chicago better? They have all been living and working here. And they were living and working here while the economy was GOOD, so their are NO EXCUSES!!
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Once again the TRUE OBAMA is coming out of hiding. This is nothing more than the usual Kneejerk Liberal jargon for taking from those that have earned their money and giving it to those that sit on their behinds and watch Oprah. What’s next no winners in the NFL…..Every team is a winner on Sunday. Wake up America this Clown is BAD NEWS.
Posted by: Harry in LA | November 1, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Obama has used people all his life, to get to where he is today. And when he is through with them, he discards them like trash.
He has associated himself with all the shady characters, because they are all corrupt, and corruption pushed him to the top faster.
His radical ideas frankly are scary, and God help us!
Obama, quit being selfish!!!take care of your brother and your aunt.
Polytics=poly-ticks (many ticks). Obama, your spreading the wealth around is nothing but polyticks, blood sucking ticks, sucking the life out of people who work for a living, and transfusing blood into dead-beats.
Posted by: Roberta | November 1, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
$250k
$200k
$150k
$120k
$???k
The tax line keeps lowering.
ANY QUESTIONS
Posted by: DeVoid | November 1, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Optimus – you are missing the point.
The UK: 5.70%. (60M People)
The Czech Republic: 4.70%. (10M People)
Ireland: 4.70%. (4M People)
Switzerland: 2.60%. (7.5M People)
Norway: 2.10%. (4.5M People)
Germany and France are over 7% unemployment now and many were at or near 10% as late as 2005.
Again, excluding Great Britain, the EU is essentially one economy becaues they cannot effectively compete with China and the US.
Just look what happend a month ago – these smaller EU countries could not back investments into their economies and countries like Great Britain was looking to pull their investments out because of bank failing etc. The entire GDP of these countries couldn’t cover the losses or debt. Why? Because what they do produce is spent on government programs and subsidy.
Germany, France etc didn’t want to try and create a “EU” solution because it props up these smaller non-producing/perfoorming countries etc..
*think*
Posted by: CRL | November 1, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Hey Jenny, I’d love to know where you are getting the data on which you base your “murder capital” proclamation. No data based in reality backs that up. Things are actually pretty good there, which is why my wife and I are looking to move there.
Posted by: Heywood | November 1, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Craig,
What’s sad is I make no where near 200k and yet I pay over 40 percent of my salary to taxes already!!! For me it would be a 20 percent raise, and what do you think I would do with that money, probably spend it on living enhancments, that why we work so hard after all isn’t it?
I’m not against helping out, and I’m smart enough to see that the country needs money to pay for services we *need*, but why isn’t everyone paying their fair share and if you earn more you pay more with a flat tax, plus you get nothing back, no need for the IRS to do returns or all that extra work we pay them to do every year between Jan and Mar. Heck we just made the country money on taxes and saved some spending in the budget. Add that 80 percent or so that doesn’t really pay anything and look at the numbers increase…
Posted by: Sean L. | November 1, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Rich is not $150,000 for a married couple in California (where as of this weekend the new bar has set). Mark my words, Obama’s plan will drop to the $60,000 level or lower in order to accomdate all of the welfare programs he wants. In Los Angeles, we have to not only pay Federal tax, but high state taxes, city taxes, high sales taxes, property taxes, high utility and phone taxes, and high city business tax if you’re a biz owner. Where does most of this go? To benefits for illegal immigrants. Our poor are getting ditched for benefits for illegals, and it’s never enough. Our schools are failing (50% drop out rate in LAUSD), we’ve closed 13 emergecny rooms in 3 years, gangs are out of control, and we spend $60 million for food stamps and welfare to illegals per month. That doesn’t include legals and poor and Seniors. Obama wants to give blanket amnesty to 20 million plus illegals and with that, he’s been promising more entitlements. Denver — watch out — you’re next.
I believe in No Taxation Without Representation. I don’t mind helping poor and Senior American citizens. I do have a problem with handouts to people that don’t pay taxes, but drive nice cars, have nice homes and clothes and computers and iPods…
Posted by: stopthemadness | November 1, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Finely we have a very clear example of the epistemological basis of of Mr. Obama’s philosophy. He has said it, selfishness is not a virtue. For Obama, sacrifice is the only virtue.
You who have been taught not to think, but only to memorize and regurgitate the familar bromides rush to agree with him. If you wish to save your mind, and eventually your life, you need to think through that very well. Ask yourself what is the nature of the sacrifice and SERVICE that Obama sings about. In any code of service and sacrifice, someone needs to get served, and brother it is not you.
If Obama wins on the 4th, I will expect that on the 5th, we will have a large calendar on a building wall in NYC with the handwritten message “Brothers, you asked for it”. And we have, for 20 years conservatives have accepted a faith based metaphysics as the foundation of their beliefs, while the collectivists have taken the education of your kids.
“Brother Love at the point of a gun”. I hope you all enjoy the show.
Posted by: john | November 1, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Certified Parasite “Obama for Change” wrote:
“And if you think about it, isn’t EVERYTHING alive a ‘parasite’ in some respect – everything needs something else to survive and if YOU have something else – well, yes, I will take it…”
OK, as you will….
..if you can get past Mr Springfield, 800 meters, and Mr Colt, 50 meters, and Mr Tantalus 0.5 meters, then you might be able to step over my dead body to get to whatever it is you think you have some right to steal.
But I am willing to take my chances on your best try……look forward to it in fact…..having trained in medicine as well as having been a soldier, I know where all of your soft tender spots are. The softest of all is in your head.
Good luck, Parasite. I know how to cure your kind of disease.
Posted by: rATsTICK | November 1, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
obama, tell me, what aspect of abortion is not selfish? what part of infanticide, euthanasia, and “safe sex” rather than abstinence is not selfish? and dont even assume i’m a “rich” republican because i’m anti-obama. i am rich in ways other than money… for instance i am rich in intelligence and that is why i am for Mr. McCain.
my husband and i live off of $20,000/yr. i just graduated from college and my husband is still in college. one of the reasons we got married because we believe in God’s definition of marriage and abstinence until marriage. we are living the american dream that my immigrant great grandparents came here for and lived. we will work for our livelihood. we dont want your dirty stolen money comrade obama. shovel your arrogance and propaganda in some other country please.
Posted by: b&j | November 1, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
In 2007 Obama made $4.2 million and gave 5% to charity, Bush made $900,000 and gave 18% to charity.
Conservative’s want you to keep your freedom to give as you see fit. Liberal’s want to spend your money for you. Stealing your freedom…
“Liberal families earn about 6 percent more than conservative families, yet conservative households donate about 30 percent more to charity than do liberal households.”
Posted by: Thom York | November 1, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Websters defines selfish as “arising from concern with one’s own welfare or advantage in disregard of others”. Welfare recipients are the ones receiving that which they did not earn, without giving anything in return. All the welfare recipient wants is more welfare. The upper 10% of wage earners pay 95% of the taxes in this country. They give generously and get nothing in return. Nor do they ask for anything in return.
Receiving welfare is the selfish act.
Posted by: Dave | November 1, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
A rising tide lifts all ships.
Do you prefer lower taxes with a corrupt government that destroys social cohesion and substantive growth, or higher taxes in a healthy social system led by democratic principles of equity and fairness?
Posted by: Derek | November 1, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I doubt, I mean seriously doubt, Obama ever read Ayn Rand. If he was walking around with that book his associates (and I know several of them) would have “set him straight”.
Posted by: Thom York | November 1, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Heywood: Chicago Sun Times & Huffington Post 10-25-08. Numerous other publications, look it up, it’s out there.
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Obama’s point – and Ann Rand’s – is of the virtue of RATIONAL self-interest. It is not rational to to harm our fellow citizens or the environment while striving for wealth. To do so is to tempt civil unrest, environmental damage, and health crises, all of which run counter to the American Dream. We have far too many in the tony halls of power who are too short-sighted and arrogantly greedy to see the waste they are leaving behind their privacy gates. President Obama will change the conversation and help to rid us of these societal slackers.
Posted by: MFlynn, MD | November 1, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Hey Jenny, I’d love to know where you are getting the data on which you base your “murder capital” proclamation. No data based in reality backs that up. Things are actually pretty good there, which is why my wife and I are looking to move there.
***************
Hey Jeff, you might want to reconsider. This is from the Chicago Sun Times:
‘Mayor Daley said today he’s “not proud” of the fact that Chicago is the homicide capital of the nation, but he said the slayings of Jennifer Hudson’s mother, brother and 7-year-old nephew could not have been prevented.’
and
‘The Chicago Sun-Times reported last week that Chicago is outpacing New York and Los Angeles in 2008 murders, even though the population here is much lower. Chicago had 426 murders through last Tuesday, compared to 417 in New York and 302 in Los Angeles.’
Posted by: Maggie | November 1, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
It seems the more fundamental argument over taxes keeps being missed. Wether or not the taking of money from one person to give to another is a legitimate function of taxation….it is not. Taxation is for the purpose of funding required government functions, not ‘fairness’ and ‘equity’.
Of course its socialism. in its purist form to use taxation as an attempted means at social equality…..BTW, it does not work, history is knocking, answer the fricken door would ya?
Posted by: tex | November 1, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I cant understand how giving handouts to people fosters anything less than lazyness? Wheres the motivation for people to get out and improve their own siuation? Free money is not appreciated because it is not earned. Sure, it MIGHT go right back into the economy, then its lost until the next handout comes along….The goal is to improve you situation, not sit around and wait for the next handout. If you want to help their situations then lower taxes, encourage business and individual income growth. That allows for more jobs for more people to get out of wellfare slavery and “poor me” “lower class” mentality.
I’ve been a young man and then part of a young couple with not alot of money. So I know what its like. But we were motivated by a sink or swim situation and we have done well over the years…without completed college educations.
Selfishness huh? Whatever you say Nobama.
Posted by: Larry M | November 1, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Thom, the “rising tide” you refer to only occurs when the individuals on the bottom know how to swim on their own. Unless they learn they will sink to the bottom.
Look at the past 60 years of welfare. We have donated approx 3.5 trillion dollars to the poor. Are there fewer of them now? The answer is no.
We have created a dependency class. I want them to learn to swim on their own, that is truly compassionate.
Posted by: Dave | November 1, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Taxes are by definition intended to fund the legitiment functions of government. Not to “spread the wealth around” or otherwise try to “make it fair”. This is Socialism. It has never in the history of the world worked no matter how maney times it has been tried.How maney countries must be ruined before this idiotic notion is put to rest?
Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
MFlynn, what they propose as a virtue, and the goal they have is formidable. However, the PATH STINKS. And the smellier part is the fact that while they are “demonizing” investment bankers, etc., they are the recipients of the most campaign dollars FROM those same investment bankers. Also, the man he is about to put in place as Chief Of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, worked for 3 years in an invesment bank and earned $18 million! He also sat on the board of FREDDIE MAC! I think it’s the free passes that Obama and his crew have
gotten, that stink. I think they’re pulling a fast one here.
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
so I am selfish.
I agree people should be able to have access to the basics. But I also think they should not buy that new car, not give their kids cell phones, have a flat tv and go out to eat 4 times a week. See, everyone makes a choice with on how to spend their money. When American’s make the choice to buy stuff instead of buying the basics first then I no longer feel responsible to provide those basics for them.
My ex sister in law has never worked a day in her life. She held her 2 kids hostage so that the government would take $800 a month out of my brothers disability, and allow her to be on welfair and get food stamps. Now here is where it gets good – she decides she still doesn’t have enough so she takes my brother to court in PA for child support. Well, when the truth finally came out PA refused to give her any more money. She gave up the kids and lost the $800 only because my brother promised to give her $300 a month to live on. Now, Obama wants me to contribute to people like her and calling me selfish. Why don’t we clean up the system first – give these people incentives to work and if they elect not to then they can’t keep their benefits.
Wasn’t it no so long ago that the dems were complaining that we needed illegal immigrants because they did the jobs that no Americans wanted to do. Simple solutions, make the non workers take these jobs – have the paycheck go to the government and then allow the government to buy their basics. Treat them like the children they have become.
Posted by: DebDel | November 1, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
We all Know how ever wins is gonna win they all lie to win the their true self comes out so be it, look at every one we have had… No Lie there…History doesnt lie Once ur in the White House you all go Bad.. Just the Truth…
Posted by: Butafly | November 1, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
I am unemployed and having very little money. There is a difference between selfishness and Uncle Obama telling who we should give our money to. IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE WHO WE SHOULD GIVE OUR MONEY TO!!!! IT IS OURS!!!!
Posted by: John | November 1, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
An awful lot of you are forgetting the promises Billy Clinton made concerning the tax cuts you were suspose to get. How many of you actually got the cuts…thats easy…NONE. What you are getting with Bill is a governance from the center love or hate Billy he was a centrast. NObama is as far left as possible. How many domestic terrorist did Bill have dinner with or how many people did Bill know and have a relationship, of any type, with that had ties to PLO. That’s an easy answer too…NONE. Clinton’s youth and young adult years are an open book…NObams is not. What you are going to get is a fiscal person like Bill and a politican like Jimm Carter…for those of you who do not remember the Carter years ask someone in their 50′s or 60′s or go the internet and find out. I promise you, you will change your mind about NObama. Do your homework before the election so you do not regret after the election
Posted by: Dave C | November 1, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
“GIVE a man a fish he is full for a day, TEACH a man to fish he will be full for a life time”
jesus didn’t teach them how to fish, just which side to throw the net and then fed the crowd…. they all starved and died the next day :)
LOL
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Which begs the questiuon, why does Obama not take care of his aunt and half-brother? Surely he has enough money. I guess he wants to dump the load on us, the taxpayers. I know alot of wealthy folks who contribuite to their families welfare. As the Bible declares, “whoever refuses to care for his family is worse than the heathen.”
Posted by: Ken | November 1, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Comrade Obama, Comrade Obama, Comrade Obama… cant you just hear the beautiful chanting on november 4
Posted by: b&j | November 1, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Dear “Obuma for chump change”
Your dim witted response is clearly indicative of the moronic mindset of Commie Light Obamists.
“A fool and their money are soon parted”
You, of course being the fool.
Posted by: Quinn | November 1, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Atlas will shrug soon.
Posted by: Pathfinder | November 1, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Quin: wrong… I don’t have ‘extra’ money now.
“A fool and their money are soon parted
You, of course being the fool”
I am not the fool and neither is Obama.
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change | November 1, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Obama for Change:
You keep saying the same thing over and over and over again. “level the playing field”
The one thing you are completely missing, and it is a big thing, is that takers cannot survive without someone else to take from.
From your continued posts it is easy to determine that you anticipate that you’ll be receiving the redistribution of wealth, not having it taken away from you. No wonder you really want that to happen.
I don’t care if you don’t like my position; I oppose you. I have the means to oppose your position without having to resort to government intervention to “level the playing field”. Your position is no more important than mine.
This is how it should work. You have your ideas, I have mine, and whatever means we can use to satisfy ourselves is fair game. You just happen to be incapable of doing anything for yourself, and therefore, when you want something, you have to get someone else to get it for you. Good luck with that, big guy.
The system is working.
Ps, I really like the cutesy :) smiley faces you put on your posts, it really makes the coercion you want seem less scary.
Posted by: Hobie | November 1, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Wow, Jake’s Ayn Rand “connection” is pretty lame.
Has Jake investigated whether Obama has ever diectly or indirectly referred to Ayn Rand in the past?
Posted by: Kris | November 1, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I think it is becoming more and more obvious that the “great-one” is nothing less that a pure Socialist. This is what he practiced in Chicago, with his buddy Ayers. Nearly all the money they gave away from the foundations they controlled were to groups in Chicago who were socialist oriented. That’s what is really important about his association with Bill Ayers. Ayers touts the fact that he is a committed “Marxist”.
What I don’t understand is why the national media has not exposed him before now. I think that it’s funny that Obama is exposing himself.
Maybe now people will understand why all of his personal records are sealed. If they were open I bet you would find out that all his associations were with committed Socialist and Marxist professors.
So I think that we now know what this great change Obama is he is offering us. Make the USA a Socialist State. He wants to make this the United Socialist States of America. USSA kinda like USSR.
This is one American who says “No thank you Mr. Obama”.
Posted by: reporter05 | November 1, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
A rising tide may lift all boats, but it won’t float those who don’t have the sense to get into a boat. In their cases, that rising tide will drown them. Remember the old saying “Give a person a fish and he eats for today, but teach a person to fish and he will eat everyday?” Well… giving the poor money feeds them for today but does nothing for their everydays.
Posted by: Keggar | November 1, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Barack Obama’s allusion to selfishness and Joe Biden’s to lack of patriotism regarding unwilling taxpayers requires comment. While accepting the core moral underpinning of the argument, nothing leads us to the conclusion that government is the proper agent for wealth redistribution. One look at Obama/Biden supporter Warren Buffet’s methods makes this eminently clear. He substantially reduced his taxes and is sharing his wealth through a private foundation–the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Even Buffet, in deed if not in word, clearly prefers a voluntary and entrepreneurial approach to the government’s in offering help and assistance where it is needed.
What Obama & Biden are proposing at a moral level is simple: If you covet your neigbor’s wealth, don’t steal it. Vote for us, we will do it for you!
This creates a double benefit for the proponents of forced wealth redistribution:
–They create an incentive for some to vote themselves benefits at the expense of others who have actually earned and produced them.
–They can then claim the mantle of moral superiority (“They Care” whereas the truth is closer to “They Care, We Pay”). These “moral credits” have all been acquired at someone else’s expense. This method is a faster and less burdensome way for these two individuals to acquire them than offering their own resources through private charities. Perhaps we should ask all who claim to like higher taxes that we would like them to make substantial contributions to the IRS above and beyond their tax liability–we will debate the issue seriously after they show us the evidence and “walk the walk”.
Few moral precept are more selfish than a politician exhorting taxpayers to subsidize both his/her vote getting as well as his/her perceived moral stature.
Posted by: U.B. Zanga | November 1, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Penny: “Obama stop the crime”
lol, isn’t south-side Chicago one of the worst places to live in the country? he has done a great job at doing that hasn’t he you delusional hippie.
Posted by: Reid | November 1, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
No Obama, Selfeshness is better described by making as much money as Biden makes and how little he donates to charity.
Posted by: tonyg10 | November 1, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
It kills me when I read and hear the O’Bama supporters whine about the bailout package only being for the rich and the big corporations. They don’t seem to understand that if those big corporations go under that people lose their jobs. If O’Bama wins and is able to get his policies implemented you better get your handout quick. When companies start struggling and going under the tax base won’t be there to pay the free loaders expecting to live off the “rich” for very long.
Posted by: JB | November 1, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“GIVE a man a fish he is full for a day, TEACH a man to fish he will be full for a life time”
jesus didn’t teach them how to fish, just which side to throw the net and then fed the crowd…. they all starved and died the next day :)
LOL
Vote Obama!
Wow, the ignorance of these Obama Kool-Aid drinkers never ceases to amaze me.
First off, that is a Chinese proverb.
Second, its a metaphor.
Lastly, how motivated are lower income earners going to be to better themselves, when the government hands them everything?
McCain Palin 08
Palin Jindal 2012
Posted by: ReaganConservative | November 1, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
If it belongs to someone else, it’s theirs.
If it belongs to you, it’s yours.
If they give it to you, it’s a gift.
If you take it from them, it’s stealing.
If the government does it for you, it’s communism.
DUH.
Posted by: Mr Duffy | November 1, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Here’s an idea: tax poverty at 95% and wealth at 5%. By handing them money, money, money, money, you give poor people NO incentive to work. And if you’re in poverty, you’re a drain on government resources. Thus, you get taxed at a higher rate. But if you can work yourself into self-sufficiency, then you’re no longer a drain on the rest of the country. People that are lazy or refuse to work, WON’T work if they have zero incentive. But show them the way out is to increase their personal wealth and they will. Imagine what a country made up of 200 million millionaires would be like. Everyone living in wealth. Everyone self-sufficient. Obama’s plan ensures you’ll have 200 million lazy slobs because it punished people who get ahead.
Posted by: Mark | November 1, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Obama is the classic huckster. He won’t take care of his own family but claims it is only fair to steal our hard earned money to pay for their care. He does not practice what he preaches in his own family. It is not selfishness when one decides to whom he extends his charity. It is not called charity when it is forcibly taken from you. It is theft, and those who accept it are in receipt of stolen property. Biden has never practiced charity with his own money but demands yours. What a fraud.
Posted by: John | November 1, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Obama for Change:
Please directly answer this question:
Do you think that Obama has, at a personal level, done what he is telling the rest of country to do in regards to: spreading the wealth?
Please answer this based on the public records of Obama’s own income and charitable giving record.
Please use facts, not emotion to respond.
Posted by: Hobie | November 1, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
My husband and I are in a high tax bracket and so already pay a disproportionate tax rate. I am a self- employed Professional. We both, like most Americans, give to charitable causes and volunteer in our civic and religious community.
My husband owns a company that employs a good number of people. Were Chairman Obama to effectively rob us of even more tax dollars, the most effective business decision would be to lay off good employees, in order to save the company. So, exactly how is Obama’s Socialistic plan helping the middle class?
What’s the real purpose of his trillion $ Civil Army? To go out and hunt down Selfish Americans and extract loyalty payments from us?
Posted by: Daisy | November 1, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
The problem here is that Obama confuses right with virtue. In the arena of right, each person has a legal right to the fruits of his/her labors. Interference with that right is legally actionable. In the arena of virtue, one has a duty of beneficence. Failure to act according to that duty is not legally actionable. If it were, it would not be virtuous. However, Obama moves this duty into the legal arena, now coercing one to act according to his duty of beneficence. There is no virtue in this.
Posted by: Tony | November 1, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
I recommend everyone read Who Really Cares by Arthur Brooks. Its very practical style and substance cuts through the ethereal, esoteric arguments about the “social” or “benevolent” role of government. It substantively makes the case for who really is benevolent and charitable to the less fortunate. The empirical studies the author conducts and cites are enlightening, exposing the liberal mindset for its intellectual flaws and, often, its dishonesty and hypocrisy. Conservatives give exponentially more than liberals to benevolent causes – both faith-based and non-faith-based. As we say in the South, “The proof is in the pudding.” Wake up, people, liberals like Obama are all too free to spend other peoples’ money (like yours) in the name of “compassion”, just not their own! They would have a lot more credibility if they put their pocketbooks where their mouths are. Please…read the Brooks book!
Posted by: Wilson | November 1, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I find all the Obama haters very amusing.
It’s not OK for Biden to call someone unpatriotic and yet everyone conveniently forgets the same charges made by the GOP against people in 2003 who DARED to ask why we were going to war.
As for the bail out, it IS socialism for the rich.
Let the companies collapse. They that got themselves into this mess should not be allowed to survive.
I believe the same goes for the average person who was DUMB enough to take out a 5/1 mortgage on a place they couldn’t even afford the interest only payments on.
We are all to blame for the current mess with our buy now pay later attitudes.
Well…..it is time to pay.
Personally, I think the choice between a Dem and Rep is like the choice between a kick in the head and a poke in the eye.
Posted by: Elio | November 1, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Are we selfish because we are tired of having our money taken away to support a broken government that is filled with incompetent people. Obama wants more money for a broken education system, more money to pay for a war that HE kept voting to support, more money for a health care system that won’t work in this country. We can’t even pay for the hugh social program of Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security. Now the young wipper snapper wants a permanent health care program. What is going to happen with all the social programs Obama wants to establish in the stressed out country when there is another financial crisis. Obama mentioned that Warren Buffet supports him. Warren Buffet wasn’t much help as an economic advisor of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. California is in the hole right now. Colin Powell’s judgement is much better. Obama says Powell supports him. Powell agreed with going to war with Iraq. Obama is an unstable young man who is living in the past and believes the American people owe him something.
Posted by: Del | November 1, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I am not selfish.
I give at least $5k to charity each year, food clothes furniture, new items mostly
I also work in a food and resource shelter.
here is what will happen.
BHO will start giving our taxes away, there will be less personal giving.
Churches and charities will suffer.
let peope handle their own money
most rich people (I am one of them) give much more much much more than lower middle class.
Joe Biden is selfish. He does not give because he does not even think aobut others
Same with BHO
Just wait you BHO worshipers
This election is stolen, and OUR DEAR LEADER WILL BRING MORE DIVISION THAN EVER
Posted by: FRUITBASKET | November 1, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
You’re selfish, I’m selfish. We’re all selfish….according to Barack Obama. But if he buys a house way under value because his convicted felon friend Tony Rezko worked out a sweetheart deal, well, Barry was just being smart.
Basically, in spite of his $250,000 tax rhetoric, he’s slowly letting out that he wants all of us to bend over and he’ll insert the phillips head screw.
Don’t believe for a moment his $250,00 tax rhetoric. He’ll get into office, announce things were worst than he imagined, and he has no choice but to raise tazes on all of us! Guaranteed!
Posted by: Darryl | November 1, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Typical left-winger class warfare. Left-wingers want us to be a nanny state modeled after Europe. Super high taxes is their path to do it.
Posted by: Mike from Fairbanks | November 1, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Is B O ready to share his palatial residence with 4 or 5 other families? One has only to travel to cities in Austria, or other socialist countries to find that in cities, a large home such as the Obamas live in are called apartments, and cannot be afforded even by the affluent. It’s time to walk your talk, Mr. O, by moving your family to the first floor so you can be a model for unselfishly sharing your upper floors with others in need.
Posted by: RCan | November 1, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Can we start over with different candidates America? God help this country, it is NOT the government that is going to get us out of this mess! These United States of America are in for the ride they have never ever known before and it is not going to be pretty!
Posted by: Winton III | November 1, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Notice how Mr. Obama never bothered to deny that his plans were socialistic. He just called McCain supporters “selfish”. Again, the truth comes out. If only the public would pay attention.
Posted by: Diogenes | November 1, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Merriam-Webster dictionary of socialism is below. The encyclopedia explanation is much more complex. Obama is not a socialist. He had dedicated his life to this country as a puplic servant dedicated to helping the people in this country. Our constitution’s preamble states that our democracy will “provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty”. This is our democracy, not “socialism”. There are some socialized benefits that do exist for the common good in our democracy such as education for all, but there is also free-market, free-speech, freedom of religion etc. You don’t provide for the general welfare with a dog eat dog too bad for the loser attitude. Our educational system exists in an effort to provide opportunities for all. That system is paid for with taxes. Taxes are necessary to the preservation of our civil liberties, and the progressive tax system has been in place since the beginning of income taxes, introduced by Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican. And, if you make less than 200,000 a year, your taxes will go down under Obama, and if you make between 200,000 and 250,000, then 95% of people’s taxes will go down. There is a huge group between 250,000 and 600,000 that will see no change, and those making over 600,000 will have taxes go back to the rate they paid under Clinton. That is not socialism. It is a modification and improvement of the current tax system of our democratic government. There is a shift in that those making under 200,000 will get a break and get to keep more of their income, and those who are making over 600,000 will be required to contribute 3% more. Our country is in huge debt and this makes us vulnerable to many dangers internally and globally. People are pointing out that raising taxes slows the economy, but Obama’s plan actually lowers taxes for the vast majority which should stimulate the economy and strengthen the middle class. Google, “chart comparing McCain and Obama’s tax plans” and you should get a link to a Washington post article/graph. It makes the comparison clear.
Here is the definition of socialism, and nobody is proposing that our government take over control of the production and distribution of goods. It’s not like anyone’s trying to have our government control the production and distribution of cars or food or clothes or technology or something. There’s a difference between that (socialism) and “promoting the general welfare” as the founders of our Constitution wished for our country. That’s absurd.
Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
Posted by: Caroline | November 1, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
He has a brother living in a hut – He has an aunt living in a slum – WHO IS HE TO CALL ANYONE SELFISH????
Posted by: Bobby | November 1, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I want this coward Obama to come to my door and demand my money.
He is nothing but a punk with a gun.
Posted by: JB | November 1, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
He has a brother living in a hut – He has an aunt living in a slum – WHO IS HE TO CALL ANYONE SELFISH????
Posted by: Bobby | November 1, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
WHy is wanting to keep the money I work for selfish? I’m working to take care of my family and me. We all make choices in life and those of us who make better choices shouldn’t have to take care of those who don’t.
Posted by: xnavygunner | November 1, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Shades of Michelle Obama saying “Americans are just down-right mean,” and now Obama he calls us selfish? They give 1% to charity, the brother and aunt live in poverty… and we are down-right mean and selfish. selfish? Disgusting actually.
Posted by: Kabees | November 1, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
So what is the ‘selfishness threshold’? At what income level does a person become ‘selfish’?
Posted by: Chucky Darwin | November 1, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Caroline,
Your posted definition is the best argument against your overly lengthy post:
“3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done”
That is EXACTLY what Obama proposes. And, that is Marxist Socialism! Thank you for countering your own misguided opinion.
Posted by: Deuce Rider | November 1, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Chucky Darwin:
Has nothing to do with wealth Chucky. If you are gainfully employed your guilty.
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
@ Bobby — thank you, Bobby! We all — ALL — benefit from living in a civil society in which the basic needs of the people are cared for. Perhaps if more Americans would travel out of the country and learn something about the world they’d see what a democracy that cares very little about it’s poor and middle class, like in India for example, looks like. They’d be appalled. In our democracy, we are pledged to uphold the general welfare. That does not equate to being a welfare state. This knee-jerk reaction to the term welfare is serious problem.
Our Constitution doesn’t talk about welfare for corporations, but somehow our leaders of the last decade have backed the American people into a corner and are forcing us to give welfare to the bumbling idiots we enabled heading huge financial institutions. IF ANYBODY THINKS OUR TAXES WON’T HAVE TO GO UP TO PAY FOR THAT AT THE SAME TIME WE FIX OUR ROADS, CONTINUE FIGHTING TWO WARS, PROVIDE EDUCATION, ETC., he is a fool. No matter who gets into office, taxes will go up for some, if not all, people.
I remember Bush I: Read my lips, no new taxes. Then I remember what happened when reality hit him square in the jaw: new taxes. And you know what? We needed to be paying them.
Posted by: Chelicera | November 1, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Caroline – The following, is the first sentence of the second paragraph for the Wikipedia definition of socialism, and is precisely why people call Obama a “socialist”:
“Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society.”
Moving on…
In 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh said:
“A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority will always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.”
If Obama is elected, there goes the country.
Posted by: Mike | November 1, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Caroline:
Notice how you made that nifty little leap from ‘promote the general welfare’ to ‘provide for the general welfare’?
Our founders were quite deliberate with language, and since you like definitions, perhaps you could read ‘promote’ and ‘provide’ and perhaps you will notice they have two entirely diffenent meanings.
Typical left….quote, then mis-quote for your arguments sake within the same paragraph. Shame.
Posted by: Kelly | November 1, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Greed is not wanting to keep the fruit of my labor.
It is greed to desire to take the fruit of someone else’s labor.
Two questions for the Obama supporters.
(1) What is the proper level of taxation by a government before you cross the line from free man to economic serf?
(2) Is there a maximum tax rate above which you will not go?
I think your answers are probably along the lines of:
(1) Whatever we say it should be; and
(2) Not as long as we still have citizens below the poverty level.
If you have no moral compunction against stealing our money, you should at least realize you are about to severely wound, if not kill, the geese that are laying the golden eggs.
The progressive tax rate is socialism, plain and simple. FAIR is evryone paying the same percentage in taxes. If I make $1M and pay 10%, I pay $100,000 in taxes. The guy making $20,000 pays $2,000 in taxes. UNFAIR is punishing success requiring the successful to pay a higher rate. Progressive rates moved us towards class envy and socialism, and was implemented during the elite’s entrallment with socialism in the 1900′s. We’ve continued to move in that direction every since.
We have to fight one battle at a time, and the battle Tuesday is to prevent a further lurch towards socialism.
We revolted against England to form this nation because of a tax rate of approximatly 3-5%. We’re now approaching 50% for upper middle class, and above that for the truly wealthy.
Again, Obama supporters, how much is enough?
Live free or die.
Posted by: Optimus Maximus | November 1, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Man!
Are Americans really to the unbalanced point of actually agreeing with Obama and his racist, socialistic ways??????
We have our society to a lowered state of a 3rd world nation if this man is put into office. I will not say if he “wins” because It has been proven the corrupt ACORN, etc., have made this election a crime.
Posted by: Steffy | November 1, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
The middle class keeps the taxes floating. Though touted as a tax on the rich, when has the middle class ever been exempt from rising taxes? To add, how many candidates win a presidency by telling the voting public that if you reject higher taxes (like we don’t already give enough already…we’re taxed for everything under the sun) you are somehow selfish. Now I think I really have heard it all!
Posted by: Kaitlyn | November 1, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Darren:
You are correct, it was after all, the leftist who proclaimed Palins un-fittness for office the fact that she did not kill here imperfect baby.
The culture of death is strong, and weird, killing is only good when it is the weakest and most innocent among us being killed…..
Posted by: Kelly | November 1, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
His Royal Majesty, King Obama the First, wants to take money from the hard-working people of his kingdom and give it to people that do not want to leave the sofa in their public housing. He should be telling the slackers to get off of their butts and go to work, but that would not make him popular with the lower class. Disgusting.
Posted by: Hephaestus | November 1, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Caroline: A couple of more quotes for you.
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free … it expects what never was and never will be.” —Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. —Thomas Jefferson
Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have … The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. —Thomas Jefferson
The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. —Thomas Jefferson
“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” —Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Obama can’t afford to give more out of his millions to charity, or to his relatives. His immediate family comes first. And according to what Michelle told a group of women in Zanesville, Ohio (whose median household income was $37,000), the kids alone cost a fortune!
“We spend between the two kids, on extracurriculars outside the classroom, we’re spending about $10,000 a year on piano and dance and sports supplements. And summer programs…Do you know what summer camp costs?”
I don’t know about you, but my heart bleeds.
Posted by: Alana | November 1, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Thank you, Kelly. It looks like the comrade apparatchik sensor zapped my post, though. I guess I better get used to this censorship; after all it will be the norm under an Obama presidency (of which no doubt ABC is all in favor of)!
Posted by: Darren | November 1, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.” Sir Alex Fraser Tytler (1742-1813). Scottish jurist and historian, he was widely known in his time and was professor of Universal History at Edinburgh University in the late 18th century. He was, at the time, writing of the fall of the Athenian Republic. When a society bases its political power on a majority vote, it is inevitable that those wishing to have power will seek to satisfy the needs of those who will provide it (vote) by transferring wealth. This leads to ever increasing public spending fueled by the self-interest of producers. With each increment in the common realm, more people are brought into the class of those receiving benefits . . . these people will take their benefits into account, desire to maintain or increase their level of benefits, vote for those who will support them, and thus, the level of spending will ever increase. The needs of the voters will eventually exceed the treasury’s ability, so fiscally unsound policies will be undertaken.
Sound familiar?
Posted by: Holman | November 1, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
The full quote is as follows: “John McCain and Sarah Palin, they call [my politics] socialistic. Y’know, I don’t know when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness. Y’know, the next thing I know, they’re gonna find evidence of my communistic tendencies because I shared my toys in kindergarten — cause I split my peanut butter and jelly sandwich with my friend in sixth grade.” – Barack Obama
Incredible! Our next president, who believes in taking from the rich and giving to the poor, completely obliterates the distinction between voluntary sharing and forced sharing — between sharing your toys with others and stealing the toys of others in order to share them — between sharing your sandwich with a friend, and grabbing my sandwich, so you can share it with your friend. The real question is: When did Barack Obama decide to make a virtue out of stealing other people’s property? Not that the Republicans don’t believe in doing the same thing, if only to a lesser degree!
As for the virtue of selfishness, sharing your sandwich with a friend is not unselfish if it is something you enjoy doing. Demanding that others share their sandwiches with perfect strangers certainly is. And who does this? Who expects you to share your hamburger with the bum sitting next to you at McDonalds? Who besides someone like Barack Obama?
And who better to answer him than the author of “The Virtue of Selfishness,” Ayn Rand: “Why,” she asks, “is it moral to serve the happiness of others, but not your own? If enjoyment is a value, why is it moral when experienced by others, but immoral when experienced by you? If the sensation of eating a cake is a value, why is it an immoral indulgence in your stomach, but a moral goal for you to achieve in the stomach of others. Why is it immoral for you to desire, but moral for others to do so? Why is it immoral to produce a value and keep it, but moral to give it away? And if it is not moral for you to keep a value, why is it moral for others to accept it? If you are selfless and virtuous when you give it, are they not selfish and vicious when they take it? Does virtue consist of serving vice? Is the moral purpose of those who are good, self-immolation for the sake of those who are evil?
“The answer you evade, the monstrous answer is: No, the takers are not evil, provided they did not earn the value you gave them. It is not immoral for them to accept it, provided they are unable to produce it, unable to deserve it, unable to give you any value in return. It is not immoral for them to enjoy it, provided they do not obtain it by right.” (Atlas Shrugged, p. 1031)
So when did Obama decide to make a virtue out of selflessness? When did he decide that sharing was morally superior to the pursuit of happiness, and that forced sharing was morally superior to the right to the pursuit of happiness? The answer is: He didn’t “decide” it; he simply absorbed it uncritically from the leftist academic environment in which he was raised and educated, and is now cashing in on it for his own political benefit.
Posted by: William Dwyer | November 1, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Chelicera, you have just defined the typical liberal. Telling us that if more of us traveled outside the US we’d see what it’s like in other countries. You see Cheli, we have, that’s why we choose to live here and are proud of our accomplishments. I’ve been proud of my country my whole life, and my family and I have proven that by donating OUR money to those who have less, inside and outside the US. You see, there is a difference between sacrificing for your education and then utilizing that education, and dropping out and spending your life collecting what the goverment hands out. And now Obama wants to come in and just take more and blindly give it away regardless of whether or not they are even trying to better themselves. It hasn’t worked in the past and I’m doubtful it will work now.
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
EARLY VOTE – IT IS A BEAUTIFUL DAY!!
Obama will save this country. End the wars. Stop the crime and government abuses. Free Healthcare. Take guns off the street. Put food on your table. Fix the economy.
“You can spend your own money and improve your house but if WE spend the money to improve the communities YOUR house will also be improved.
Vote Obama!
Posted by: Obama for Change”
When the antichrist does come, i have no doubt youll be one of the first idiots in line kissing his backside.
Posted by: PK | November 1, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
While Obama is accusing us of being selfish, it turns out that he has an impoverished brother in Kenya that he hasn’t LIFTED A FINGER TO HELP! I think his claim to moral virtuehood is completely empty and would be laughable EXCEPT that he intends to make this the centerpiece of his presidency.
Posted by: You gotta be skeptical | November 1, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
There is nothing illegal about all of crying for the necessity of higher taxes to send in more of your money. If you really believe that pouring more money down the ratholes of pubic education and welfare is the answer then you are truly lost.
What happens to all the money we pay now? Why does $15,000.00 per year in a Washington D.C. public school produce nothing when compared to a $5,000.00 per year private school? Welare is not a safety net, it is a hammock and more goes to those who pass it out than those they pretend to want to help.
Money for roads and bridges are wasted for liberal pet projects and still liberals cry for higher taxes to maintain them. Look at highways in Arizona which are surrounded by colorful murals but still full of potholes. Look at the bridge in Minnesota that collapsed because the governor of that state was using money for road maintenance for other unnecessary projects.
Look at the levees in New Orleans that were neglected because the Democrat governor was using that money to make the Mississippi river deeper.
I suggest we hold public officials accountable even to the point of terming it treason to misuse taxpayers dollars. I mean for every government program from medicaid to defense contracts.
Buy your guns now before Barry takes over the country. Soon American health care will be reduced to taxpayer funded abortions, sex changes and methadone treatments.
Posted by: John Trujillo | November 1, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
If you don’t like that then start your own monarchy. In a democracy we all get one vote.
I’m going to vote for what I think is best for my family and my country. I am voting for Obama.
Hey look Ayn Rand! I’m being selfish!
Posted by: SeattleTomy | November 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
**This is our democracy***
We’re a republic, not a democracy
Posted by: maggie | November 1, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Most talk about Obama being socialist. He talks the talk, will he walk the walk? The problem with liberals is that they ignore the 10th Admendment to the constitution which leaves everything not expressly written in the constitution up to the states. This includes abortion, gay marriage, education, etc. Liberals want the power concentrated in the Federal gov’t hands not the state. Under Obama, more power will be given to the federal gov’t, thus helping to destroy the Founding fathers original intent. Obama will also stack the Supreme Court with like minded justices insuring the destruction of our constitutional protection from a tryannical federal government.
Posted by: joe | November 1, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Fact: Obama spent his elementary school years in an Indonesian school. He did not pledge allegiance to our United States flag during those formative years – nor did he receive any of the ‘normal’ indoctrination to American values during that critical time of life.
Fact: Obama only pledges allegiance to his Obama Nation. He and his wife have not been proud of or loved the nation that we live in.
Fact: Charity begins at home and you can tell someone’s character by how charitable they are without being forced.
Fact: Obama’s middle name is Hussein.
Opinion: Obama started this campaign in Bill Ayers’ home as a lark. He had no idea that with Oprah’s $$ and undisclosed foreign money how far it would go. He is in way over his head and is misleading Americans to hope that he can provide something for them that they do not have to work for. However, to get ahead in America, one thing is required: Hard work.
Opinion: I want my president to be a traditional American – one who has grown up learning and living by true American ideals.
Posted by: small business Al | November 1, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
SeattleCommy wrote:
“The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”
Karl Marx wrote:
“From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.”
Sounds pretty much the same, doesn’t it?
Posted by: You gotta be skeptical | November 1, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
lets see send more of my earned money to a over bloated federal goverment. that spends more money than they take in on a daily basis. also the most gross personal perks that most ceo’s could ever dream of. 5 free leased cars, free gas, travel, gormet meals for $2, staff in washington and home town, private spa, first in line for the bunker. these are just a few things these bozo’s get no wonder you want to be a career politicion.the cars youd think they would lease reasonable cars. no ob went for caddilac escalade and 4 accuras. all at your expense. some lady cogresswoman got a hummer. they all take advantage. this is why we need more accountability or term limits the media doesnt report it. so they should pass a law that every year congress must report all money’s spent on there perks or show america what they get each year at your expense.
Posted by: carl6352 | November 1, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
lets see send more of my earned money to a over bloated federal goverment. that spends more money than they take in on a daily basis. also the most gross personal perks that most ceo’s could ever dream of. 5 free leased cars, free gas, travel, gormet meals for $2, staff in washington and home town, private spa, first in line for the bunker. these are just a few things these bozo’s get no wonder you want to be a career politicion.the cars youd think they would lease reasonable cars. no ob went for caddilac escalade and 4 accuras. all at your expense. some lady cogresswoman got a hummer. they all take advantage. this is why we need more accountability or term limits the media doesnt report it. so they should pass a law that every year congress must report all money’s spent on there perks or show america what they get each year at your expense.
Posted by: carl6352 | November 1, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Holman,
“When a society bases its political power on a majority vote, it is inevitable that those wishing to have power will seek to satisfy the needs of those who will provide it (vote) by transferring wealth.”
The only thing i disagree on this post is that we do NOT live in a country where majority vote always win. We live in representative Republic. That is why we have an electoral college, so that New York, California, Texas, and other large states do not invalidate the votes from New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and, Montana.
If it was strict majority there would be little attention payed to about 40+ states. Our founding fathers were wise enough to see that it would/could cause a problem in keeping our union together.
Even wheb there were just 13 states.
That is the only disagreement with your post.
Posted by: Bobb | November 1, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Obama has the same nerve and distorted view of this country as usual.Selfish is the last term for someones with his record of donations.Look them up.1% of adjusted gross income for 1999 thru 2004.And he says selfish?How about his partner Biden?It’s even more patriotic,using his own words.Drum roll please…… .02 yes .02 AGI.He donated less than 300 dollars with an income of 319,000 in 1999.And they want our money to give to others.They don’t no how to give to others out of their own pockets and they know better how to use your money to benefit others?Please don’t insult us, you frauds.
Posted by: glen | November 1, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
SeattleTomy: Tomy can’t help it he is a product of our State Run School system where we don’t teach history or social studies, rather PC BS.
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
SeattleTomy,
This is a Republic. The needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many. The protection of the liberty of the individual is paramount. The founding fathers knew this. Read the Declaration of Independence. God help us all if anybody’s individual liberty is taken away for the needs of the many. Who will be first to donate his individual liberty for someone else’s benefit?
Posted by: joe | November 1, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Yes, I CAN {‘t} afford that new house with no money down and an ARM mortgage with a three year balloon, yes I can…..’Cause ‘The One’ tol’ me I could….
Good luck to all you Kool-Aid drinkers in the Democrap Party……… You’ll soon be getting exactly what you deserve……….
in SPADES…….
Posted by: Rumple Stiltskin | November 1, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Holman: You are correct and I think we have already reached the tipping point with about 52% of the population beholden to government for some portion of their income.
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
MY FAMILY’S MOTTO: “WE WILL GIVE OF OUR TIME, TALENT AND TREASURE ‘TILL HELL FREEZES OVER; WE WILL NOT BE TAKEN!” NOT ALL ‘CHARITIES’ ARE LEGIT, SCAMS ABOUND WITH PATHETIC STORIES; THERE ARE SOME LIERS AND CHEATS IN EVERY “FEEL GOOD” PROJECT. OBAMA’S MENTORS AND IDEOLGY ARE…TAKERS…NOT GIVERS! Unless, of course it is with money they have TAKEN.
Posted by: Lorraine | November 1, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Barack Hussein Obama has run a thug campaign protected by good Americans wanting to be overly politically correct. Do your own research and your own thinking before you make a mistake that could cost you and your children in the future. Do not swallow everything the media wants to feed you.
We are so used to all of our politicians being liars that we think it is normal – you really have to look at what Obama’s lies are covering up. Wake up America – don’t believe the lie.
I talked to an Obama fan this morning. He said he doesn’t report his cash income anyway and only paid taxes on $14,000 last year. Obama will turn this nation into a third world country where small businesses will only deal in and then hide cash transactions. Think of Miami, Florida where there are thousands of people who work for cash only, pay no income tax or Social Security, but use every governmental handout program that they can. Imagine a nation that operates the same way. Don’t believe me? Drive down SW 8th Street, Miami (Calle Ocho to you natives).
Many small businesses and American citizens are being blackmailed right now with the threat, that is real, that the same people that are voting for Obama plan to riot and burn their own cities, destroying and looting the small businesses there, if Obama does not win. Remember who paid for Obama’s education – the Black Panthers.
Posted by: All-American | November 1, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I would like to address a problem that only a few people in Government are interested in discussing and it is a shame that both Presidential candidates continue to avoid it altogether. In fact, our present economic crisis pales in comparison to this impending crisis. Guess what this next crisis is? It’s the 60 trillion in unfunded liabilities (Federal Deficit, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Federal Pensions, Military Pensions and Military Medical Benefits). These programs are out Out-of-Control with no solution in sight. The 59.1 trillion ($187,347/person) is an actuary value given in today’s dollars that reflects the money this fund would need to meet our future obligations for these programs. To put this into perspective, if the government were to shutdown today and stop collecting taxes for any new spending, we would still need to collect $1.144 trillion in taxes today with subsequent increases of 5-6% (due to the cost of living increases and the increase in the number of retirees) every year until 2038 after this approximate point we would see a decrease of 2-4% until 2080 (approximate year the last person on social security would be living) to pay for our past commitments. This would eliminate Medicaid and other State-sponsored Children’s Health Insurance Programs. Also, I want to make sure that everybody understands that we would be eliminating welfare, unemployment compensation or any other social program expense. By the way, does anybody know what we have spent in 2008? It is approximately $3.16 trillion which includes $500 billion in deficit spending. This does not include the $700 billion “Investment in America” spending bill. Oops, I forgot to mention that this doesn’t include the $291 billion in interest that we will continue to pay on our $10 trillion national debt. So if we start today without our Federal Government, we will still be on the hook for $1.435 trillion. I’m not Pro-Labor or Pro-Business- I’m Pro-KID. If we don’t do something quickly, we are surely condemning our children to a dim prospect of life and limited prosperity. I kind of look back to previous generations (our great-grandparents, our grandparents and our parents) and I see what a great country they left us by their hard work, sacrifice and family values, but what I see today is apathy, corporate greed, government waste, decrease commitment to hard work, our social entitlement attitude, the lack of responsibility and finally the lack of God in our country. We definitely have become a nation of people that have the attitude of, “What are you going to do for me” and “What’s in it for me”.
The only way to right-the-ship is to gut it out and sacrifice. This means the Federal, State, local governments must stop spending. Personal consumption must be reduced so that personal savings can increase. Also, there is no way that we can afford the proposed 5.8% increase in social security benefits for next year while Medicare and Medicaid cost continue to soar. Social Security was not meant to provide the benefits that today’s retirees are receiving- the necessary funds were never collected. Next, Federal Pension Plans must be reduced. Again, we can’t afford the commitments that our great leaders have promised. It’s unfortunate that more and more retirees are dependant on these benefits since most companies have eliminate their Defined Benefit Plans and have opted instead for 401K’s which shifts the retirement risks to the employee. I don’t know how you can provide incentives for business to increase 401K contributions, but something needs to be done. It’s my opinion that increasing payroll and Social Security taxes on businesses and employees is a bad idea and is only delaying the inevitable collapse of the Social Security program. It seems reasonable for us to expect that social security recipients should only receive Social Security benefits based on what was collected over their working careers? Sound actuary benefit analysis would determine these benefits- not government’s social conscience. Other services for the elderly would be available for those requiring additional assistance. It just won’t be a part of Social Security. Next, non-funded Medicare and Medicaid benefits would need to be collected from other sources other than FICA taxes. FICA taxes were never expected to provide these benefits. Therefore, these benefits must be reduced.
So where does this leave us? Why of course- increase taxes. Last year our expected tax revenue was $2.66 trillion. So let’s calculate the taxes we must collect to meet our basic obligations. As I mentioned above $1.435 trillion is already committed for next year. Now let start adding the programs: Medicaid and State Children Insurance ($209 billion), Military ($481.4 billion), Global War on Terror ($145.2 billion), Department of Education, Health and Human Service, Agriculture, Homeland Security, Education, Veterans Affair, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, Justice, NASA, Interior, Transportation, Interior and Energy ($396.6). This is total of $2.6672 trillion which doesn’t consider the $90.8 billion in on/off-budget discretionary spending as well as the typical $400 billion in deficit spending. Oh by the way, for the foreseeable future, your Social Security and Medicare (FICA) taxes would only go to paying current recipients. You would not accrue any more benefits after this year. This is the most important point to help emphasis the fiscal problems we are now facing.
As for taxes, based on my calculations, we only need $3.0672 trillion for next year while we stop accruing Social Security or Medicare benefits. Since we only collected $2.66 trillion this year, I don’t see how we can balance the budget without raising taxes. So if taxes have to be raised, who should pay them? Also, for all you fair tax proponents, the fair tax rate would need to be 22% based on a GDP of $14 trillion in order to generate the same $3.07 trillion revenue. To be honest with you, it only makes sense that the additional taxes come from those fortunate higher income wage earners. I don’t like putting this additional burden on them, but the lower income wage earner doesn’t have the ability to contribute.
If you think it is a good idea to continue accruing Social Security and Medicare benefits than we must generate an additional $800 billion a year to properly fund it. This would require us to increase our FICA by 12% (6% employee and 6% employer). I would recommend any increases in FICA taxes go directly into an employees accounts and not to the Federal Government. Their track record speaks for itself.
Finally, I would like to end by saying that wages for lower and middle income earners has to drastically improve. If not, we will continue down this road where hopelessness and despair are the norm while the class warfare escalates.
Todd
Posted by: Todd | November 1, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Glen: Obama and Biden have a right to be as stingy as thet want in their charitable acts. And you have the right to feel about them as you do and even to share your opinion as widely as you want. However, none of us should have the right to force others to do as we see fit in acting charitably — especially invoking the police power of the government to do so.
Posted by: Lance | November 1, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I have an older brother, actually two of them, who have informed me they are voting for Obama. I have sent them reams of information on Obama and his associations to no avail. I have come to the conclusion that Obama’s support has nothing to do with an intellectually arrived at support for his plans or policies and is rather totally emotional. I sent one of them three articles from the foreign press, one from Canada, one from Australia and one from the UK. I was informed not to send anymore of my Republican propaganda. Didn’t know the Republican Party controlled the foreign press. It is obvious the Democrats control the domestic press however. “Don’t’ confuse me with the facts my mind is made up.”
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Selfish! What a display of unmitigated GALL by the leftist Obama! The federal government, with a nearly 3 TRILLION DOLLAR BUDGET and an insatiable appetite to spend even MORE, has NO CREDIBILITY to call ANYONE selfish!
WE are selfish because we want to government to reduce its size and spending? Sickening. Disgusting.
Posted by: LightRay9a | November 1, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Question to the disenfranchised – When you are no longer disenfranchised, what will the democrats stand for, what will they do?
The fact is, they need to keep you down, to keep their jobs.
Posted by: D. Marshall | November 1, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
The left attaches such great virtue of taking care of the poor, but only when that care is provided by the government and the resources are taken through taxes. I always find it interesting, that in study after study, political liberals donate less to charity than do political conservatives, and that Americans are far more charitable than are Europeans where the government has taken over almost all charitable services.
Posted by: Matt | November 1, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Obama want to share the wealth……. what BS ………. maybe he can help million like me make payroll on mondy with no lines of credit, delinquent accounts receivable…….I don’t need the BS or the promises…….. I need action in 24 hours …….Obama is very generous with everyone elses money except his own …….. as for those people who he going to give my ahrd earned money too……… get a dam job……nortgage your future and start your own business but get the hell out of my wallet.
Posted by: Joseph | November 1, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
do some of you all know what welfare really is? welfare is not just financial assistance or foodstamps. welfare is also government funding programs to help people who cant afford to go to school, get into the classes they need. i live in NC and we have alot of government funding programs that help people get nursing certificates because here that is booming. these programs help people get off welfare.so it is not taking money from the rich and giving to the poor. obama is not going to take from the rich and give to NO ONE WHOM IS NOT WORKING PEOPLE. please get facts right. I think everyone needs healthcare. i am big on that. my mom has a heart condition and cant get life insurance nor health insurance. when i stop working at a company, the insurance company sent me a letter stating, i can keep my insurance as long as i pay $359 per month. that is expensive! when my mom tried to get healthcare they told her either no or $600 per month. we are self-employed and make ok money running a daycare. you know we give our HARD EARNED MONEY ALSO and dont complain. when i see people getting their GED or going back to school, that makes me feel real good. make me feel like i have done a good deed. we should not have to be made to give to the needy. if it is only a ride to the store. How many people can honestly say that when they see someone walking to the store, they actually offer a ride to them. hardly any, for one times have gotten hard and people are crazy. for two, what is your reason? is selfishness? I had a friend that say a guy on a cell phone but he was catching the bus. she said he got the nerve to have a cell phone and dont have a car. meaning he dont cell phone because he doesnt have a car. of course we got into an argument. i told her dont put others down because you have what you have. that does not mean the man didnt work or didnt take care of his kids. he just could not afford a car. the moral of this was to let you know that some people need alittle help sometimes and we should not put them down because they need it. i think some people need to actually find out truths to things before posting. some people are just hating and we all know it. i am not talking about racism, racism has been around for many years. it was just covered up. i think we need to look at our kids and we can tell which direction the world is going in. it is not about obama nor mccain. it is about us, AMERICANS. now we have people saying that some are ANTI-AMERICAN OR PRO-AMERICAN, come on people, we have to live here together. just because people dont bring up racism like they use to is because it is not necessary. we know what we have to do in life to succeed. do why belittle yourself to ignorance. there is no need. i feel that is why obama is not worrying about mccains attacks on him. it is normal it is expected. obama has more to worry about when he is elected. he has to worry about his children (with him being the first black president), he has to worry about his wife(being the first black first lady), he has to worry about the economy, war(s), foreign trade, and just HATE! he has said the same thing throughout his whole campaign on what he wanted to change and who he wanted to help. we are so divided as people that we are letting them further divide us. LIKE I SAID BEFORE, I WOULD NEVER EVER WANT TO SEE SARAH PALIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE! SHE IS NO WHERE NEAR READY FOR PRESIDENCY. DO YOU FEEL SHE IS MORE EXPERIENCED THAN OBAMA? REAL ANSWERS PLEASE, NOT RACE ANSWERS.
Posted by: ncobama | November 1, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Todd, I appreciate and respect your knowledge and ability to crunch the numbers. I worry too, about what a mess we are leaving for our children. But the problem I have for privatizing
our retirement dollars is, the number of people my age (49), who have saved over $50K for retirement is something like 25%. The rest have nothing. If you have worked for 25 years and you’ve only saved $50K, you must be living beyond your means, and not taking advantage of your 401k savings plans. $50K is not much for 25 years of work. If we can’t get people to save now, what makes you think people will save if it’s privatized? And trust me, I’m not a proponent of the government investing our dollars. I just don’t see where a lot of people have the will, discipline or pride it takes to save and be self sufficient. It’s easier to just cop out and take the hand outs.
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
So… How big does the government have to get before not wanting to pay more taxes is deemed as less selfish?
Before I go on I should make clear that this is not as much of an anit-Obama comment as it is an anti-frigging-huge-government comment. McCain hasn’t struck me as the type that would do much better at reducing government size and scope.
I don’t make a lot of money by any stretch, but I know what the government takes from me and my family is enough to pay the salary for some low level bureaucrat to stand in the way of any progress. Because of that its tremendously hard to both pay bills and save money for a rainy day. I don’t want to pay any more taxes. Does that make me selfish?
When will politicians start saying.”We take plenty of money from the tax payers and we haven’t been spending it wisely?”
I don’t care if it’s Obama or any other politician, but I am extremely offended by the implication that my desire to not pay more taxes makes me selfish.
Quit wasting both my money and my investment in this country, government!!! That statement goes out to both the Democrats and Republicans.
Posted by: Clint | November 1, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Have you noticed ladies and gentleman that since the Dems took over both houses of Congress in 2006 that the value of your money has fallen over 25% against the Canadian dollar, 20% against the Yen and calls are being made to move from the dollar to the Russian Ruple and the Chinese Huan as the international standard?
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The Chinese just put men in space and India is headed for the moon. America faces a new era of competition. The twentieth century mindset that unrestrained capitalism can produce a coordinated response to the market has already been shown to be erroneous. As far as socialism goes that baby was delivered when the bailout bill was passed. In order for America to keep her edge on the world we need to upgrade our information infrastructure. In simple terms we need to upgrade the internet. Obama has addressed this concern. Whether or not he follows through remains to be seen. McCain will most certainly not do what needs to be done. The internet, its uses, its possibilities and its power is beyond his comprehension.
Ideologies and party affiliations are of no interest to me. My only concern is that America remain competitive in the 21st century. Technology rules the world and McCain is at best, behind the times and at worst, an outright technophobe.
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
ncobama, the things you point out are riddled with what is wrong with America. You point out that welfare isn’t just food stamps, etc. Very true. How about thinking this way for a change? As far as using tax dollars for GED programs, how about, if you drop out the first time and want to come back, it’s no longer free. You had your chance for a free education the first time, and if you chose to drop out, when you go back you have to pay. And as far as nursing programs go, they should not be free. It’s called a STUDENT LOAN, to be paid back when you are done and EARNING a paycheck. That’s how the rest of us live! Sorry about your Mom’s health. Now that is something where a welfare program is necessary. But, there are simply too many things we have put under the category of welfare, and we just can’t, as a nation, afford them anymore.
Posted by: Francis | November 1, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Todd, i think you put it well. i dont know if other people read the whole thing or not but i did. i dont care if you are rep or dem. i do agree with you. i think i was well put together and thought out. good deal.
Posted by: ncobama | November 1, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Charity…that is really rich. Joe Biden doesn’t believe in giving his money to charity. He has given less than $2 a week to charity. Who does that? No one I know.
Posted by: Bern | November 1, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
thanks for that heart wrenching story Jenny….but you still haven’t explained WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO ANYTHING YOU HAVE NOT EARNED…first off…we aren’t entitle to success…I grew up poor/low middle class…but I went to college on an academic scholarship, then to medical school and now I finally can afford things for the first time in my life…but I have two hundred thousand dollars in student loans…I don’t get a write off for the interest I pay the government because I make too much…but that’s fine…I pay over six thousand dollars a month in federal taxes already…far more than my share…my money is earned…there was no secret rich white fund that I withdrew it from…so forgive me for being selfish and not wanting the feds to take more than the 70,000 I already pay.
Posted by: clint | November 1, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
He calls me selfish for wanting to not pay higher taxes. Yes I’m no rich person, yet, but even though Obama promises only to raise taxes on the rich, that surely doesn’t mean I won’t feel the effect of said tax increases. Perhaps my rich employer will decided to lay me off to offset the higher tax bill. Maybe he’ll dismantle the business altogether rather than pay Obama’s tax for the poor and pathetic. Prices will rise because the big bad rich will pass tax increases on to their products or services. Bottom line is that no tax increase ever produced a job or a great economy; actually taxes have the opposite effect of keeping an economy surpressed. So all you socialist folks out there under the spell of Senator Obama, be careful. You may end up ruining it for everyone through higher prices and job layoffs.
Posted by: Edge | November 1, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
you people are idiots.
Posted by: troy | November 1, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Charity…that’s really rich. Joe Biden doesn’t believe in giving his money to charity. He has given less than $2 a week to charity. Who does that? No one I know. I can’t wait to see what tax havens the celebrities rush to get into. The Hollywood and New York crowd should donate their money to the govenment in a special category called Guilt.
Posted by: Bern | November 1, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Listen what Obama said: “they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness” However, it is exactly what Obama is proposing i.e., “to spread the wealth around”, which means to get other people’s money, instead of earning it by yourself.
Posted by: Frank | November 1, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Jim | Nov 1, 2008 2:58:04 PM:
I don’t disagree with you entirely but I am afraid that if Obama is elected and has totally Dem. Controlled Congress work with, he will be able to pass most of the tax raises and spending proposals that he has made. If that happens first billions of dollars will move off shore into secure accounts, businesses and jobs will follow and the brain drain that brought the worlds best and brightest here in the 70’s & 80’s will reverse leaving us with the meritocracy that Marxism always produces.
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Great Post Todd.
Thanks
Posted by: Clint | November 1, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Clint, please don’t credit me with that misguided sob story. I’m with you. I’m tired of the welfare state expansion. ncobama spoke of a few programs like the GED and nursing programs being categorized as welfare giveaways. If you screw up your free h.s. education the first time, you should have to pay, something, to go back for the GED. And when I was in school, nursing programs, if you didn’t have money to pay for them, were paid with student loans, not welfare money. We’ve expanded welfare to cover too many things, that’s why we can’t afford it anymore. It needs to be scaled back to cover food, shelter and medical. If you want to be a nurse, lawyer, doctor, etc., and you can’t pay, do what the rest of us have done, take a student loan and then when you have an income, pay it back. Can you tell I’m aggravated?
Posted by: Jenny | November 1, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
100 million murdered by communist governments last century.
Obama’s Chicago-highest murder rate in U.S.
Nuff said….
Posted by: Doug | November 1, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I understand people’s apprehensions about Obama and his, real or imagined, Marxist tendencies. However, let us remember that he can, at most, serve only eight years. His powers are limited, even with a democratic congress.
I have little faith in politicians but I have complete confidence in the Founding Fathers.
If America had situation like Bolivia where the majority of the population is extremely poor I would be more worried. I do not think that this country is full of so many bums that this whole thing will turn into a Marxist nightmare. I find most Americans, regardless of where they are from, to be ambitious and hardworking. I don’t think the majority of the America working class would be content to sit around in small apartment without working just because a generous welfare system would make it possible. Americans like the good things in life and no political or economic system is going to deliver that.
I believe America has more winners than losers and for that reason I’m not worried about a Marxist takeover.
Posted by: Jim | November 1, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Went to work at 14 washing windows, worked summers cutting lawns at 16 went to work in the oil fields in ND went into the Navy at 18 went to Viet Nam at 20. After that I worked surveying electric lines, worked as a roffer, tank builder, on pipelines, as an auto mechanic. Went to work for Texaco at 33 and retired at 65 having put my wife through college and raised 3 kids two of whom are through school and one working on a doctors degree. In that time I increased my net worth from 36 cents on Christmas day 1969 to over 3/4 million dollars by hard work and frugal living and wise investments. Never earned over 50,000 salary per year in my life. Now tell why should I be ashamed of what I have and what moral justification do you or anyone have on what is mine? I have no problem helping anyone who can’t help themselves and I do. But I feel no compunction to help those who wouldn’t help themselves when given the same opportunity I have had.
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 1, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
There has never, never, never, never, ever been a country on this earth that has taxed its way to prosperity for all.
Obama’s premise is impossible to achieve. He will only be punishing those who strive to get ahead. I already work hard for my family, and probably carry s few more “non-producers” along with me thru taxes. How many more must Obama declare that I carry? Sooner or later the producers get tired of being punished for their success. It’s not at all “selfish” to say – Let me decide what charity I want to give my money to. Why should socialist “Senator Government” get my hard-earned money and decide whose worthy of receiving it?
Posted by: John in WI | November 1, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
So Obama just called virtually everyone selfish but that won’t bother his supporters. After all, he’ll only raise taxes on people making over $250,000, oops I mean $200,000, then again maybe $150,000 for a family…hmmmmm
Posted by: Kathy | November 1, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
you know what kills me about “OUR PEOPLE” we are so quick to say my hard earned money. some of the people such as celebraties, singers, producers, actors/actress etc. would not be where they are if it was not for record sales, movie sales, etc. i dont think they should be made to give back. who are they giving back to? that is the question. Some of them do not give to anyone. they just go buy $1000 worth of panties and bras or gold teeth. that is where our country has gone. kids want to be hard and not educated. do you all know that our kids are learning Civics in schools. I am in NC and my son is a 9th grader and he is not learning civics. that use to be a high school requirment. Our kids are learning nothing in school but can tell you about every song on the radio, or tv show. that is a problem. In our schools the kids have so access to internet but not education related. they be on mtv.com, vh1.com or bet.com. none of these channels are educational. like i said before i am a small business owner and no i dont make $250,000 or more. i do pay my far of taxes and i do give back to my community. i dont really have much to give. i have mortgage of $1200/mo. on top of car payment of $300/mo. and pay my employees that work for me. you build the country from the BOTTOM UP, not from the TOP TO THE BOTTOM. if the rich are already rich and the poor are barely making ends meet, why not a little assistance. I think some of you are misunderstanding what obama is going to try to do. because no matter what he or mccain say, it has to go through congress first. it does not mean that everything they say will be passed. mccain is lieing if he says that he will not raise anyones taxes. he will have to, to get us out of the mess that bush has put us in. so, the next question is “who do you tax?” do you tax the single parent working 2 jobs at mcdonalds and a diner at night,Or do you tax Beyonce who already has millions? we have to build our country back up. we cant let our negativity take control. whether we know it or see it, God knows all of our feelings. he will not let us continue to mess up his world. that is all of us! we have worked hard to get where we are so please dont let our ignorance make us do something that we will later regret, PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!!(REMEMBER?)
Posted by: ncobama | November 1, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Jim wrote:The twentieth century mindset that unrestrained capitalism can produce a coordinated response to the market has already been shown to be erroneous.
When Jim? When in this century has capitalism been ‘unrestrained’? Government has interfered in every aspect of ‘capitalism’ sinse the new deal, and yet you lay the blame not where it belongs, on government, but on supposed capitalism. Let me give you just one example of your ignorance….the market is naturally adverse to offering a mortgage to one who cant afford it, it only makes sense, government is the only reason for the market being forced onto what is by common sense a stupid loan….in the name of ‘equality’ ‘fairness’ ‘social justice’
When has the free market been un-feddered?
Posted by: Kelly | November 1, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
I agree with Obama about making donations to a church or organation. And I just want to say that now days that charity starts at HOME. With bills, groceries to buy, and all the other things, people have the right to choose what they do with their money. And if Obama gets elected, we all will have more Money to do with what we want to. McCain is just another Bush, for the RICH, leaving the middle class and lower class Paying More. We can not afford that for another 4 years.
Posted by: Richard Norman | November 1, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Clint,
Unfortunately, our Federal Government has created such a mess with these unfunded liabilities- we are now reaching the critical mass where inaction will lead to dire consequences. If you are familiar with FICA, today, you and your employer pay 7.65% (this is a total of 15.3%) on wages up to $102,000 ($106,000 in 2009). The Medicare portion (1.45% from you and your employer- 2.9% total) continues to be collected on the remainder of your wages. As I mentioned in my earlier posting, we need an additional $800 billion a year to provide everybody’s anticipated benefits otherwise the $3.1 trillion budget will only satisfy the current retirees. This addition $800 billion would require an additional contribution from you and your employer of 6% (a total of 12%). Your entire FICA contribution would now be 27.3%. I’m suggesting that this additional money be invested in some conservative investment that would earn 4-6%/year. My question to everybody is this- knowing the dismal track record of the Federal Government, do you think it is wise to have them assume this responsibility? By the way, our wise Federal Government never thought it was appropriate to fund the retirements of the millions of military and Federal workers. I would like to know why the Federal Government requires private pension plans and other State and Local government plans to be properly funded when they don’t think it is necessary. Doesn’t it make you sick knowing that Social Security and these unfunded Federal pensions are at risk?
Getting back to your response, I’m not advocating this be a voluntary program. The employee and employer will have to participate in this retirement plan.
Todd
Posted by: Todd | November 1, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
The last three apartments I’ve been in were littered with roaches, not because I’m a dirty guy, because I could only afford to live in a crappy apartment. It sucks to put yourself through college without mommy and daddy’s help…
So when I finally break through, I have no desire to “spread the wealth” because I worked my fingers to the bone.
I have no desire to “get” some rich guy. One day I’ll carve a nice little life out for myself, and when I do I don’t want moronic politicians implying that I should redistribute my hard-earned cash to someone else. No thanks, Barack. Take that garbage to Venezuela…
Posted by: dtrod | November 1, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gain and dividends, and that this is less then the 95% of hard working Americans pay on their income does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
VOTED!!!
Let’s hope I made the right choice and America will be better for it.
CHANGE we can live with…not just a Chicago Mob Slogan!!!
Posted by: Guest28409 | November 1, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
ncobama, I hope you’re joking. If you or anyone else CHOOSES to buy Beyonce’s cd’s, you did it willfully. No one held a gun to your head and told you to buy it. So your conclusion is to punish Beyonce for you purchasing her cd’s? No logic there. As far as kids and TV watching – TURN IT OFF. When kids are in school that’s the opportunity to teach them about hard work. Sunday through Thursday, if you have school aged children, you have no business having a television on. If they finish their homework and can watch TV without disturbing siblings, then fine, but remember, they can always pass the time reading and improving themselves. And no, the country will not improve with helping from the bottom and hoping it trickles up. The people at the bottom have no money to spend. They need to save for retirement and become self sufficient. The growth will come from the top and middle, unless of course Obama taxes them to death, then we all lose!
Posted by: ed | November 1, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
francis, i understand what you are saying and some of it i do agree. where i live there is alot of teen drop outs and it is getting greater. i believe they make it free so that kids want to go back to school. if you tell a teen drop out that you can go back to school but you have to pay for it, they are not going to go. if they dont go then that leaves us to take care of them with welfare. while some women are on welfare, they make them go to school and take advantage of some of the programs they have to offer. if they choose not to do so, then they are cut off. i think there needs to be some structure to the welfare system. i dont think people should get it because they are lazy and choose not to do anything with their lives. i think it should be for SINGLE parents who really need it. I have been in our Social Service building and you will be surprised how many husbands and wives are in there trying to get benefits. I am against that. Husband and wife, hell no. i am not wanting to take care of a whole family because they are sorry and lazy. but the single mother or father, YES. Most of them are hispanic. The people that do my nails which are Korean or Vietnamese(if spelled right,lol) were also in there. I know they make about $500 a day. Now that is what i am against. I think some education should be free. At my local library they have GED classes for adults and some teens. The teachers are not paid, it is voluntary. I am for that all day. Some of the programs we have need a lot more discipline. I am really new to politics and some of it i dont understand. I read alot and listen to other peoples views. what exactly is Marxist? maybe i sound ignorant but it is ok.
Posted by: NC | November 1, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Dear Obama for a Change: You do mean Chump change don’t you??
Posted by: Virginia | November 1, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Dear Obama for a Change: You do mean Chump change don’t you??
Posted by: Virginia | November 1, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
PDSimic:The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gain and dividends, and that this is less then the 95% of hard working Americans pay on their income does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?
40% of American workers pay NO INCOME TAX. There has never been a point in our history when 95% of the population has paid income taxes…..you my friend are ignorant. If you were inclined, you would know where 95% of income tax comes from…..
Posted by: Kelly | November 1, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
nc, the problem stems from the fact that we give too many free passes to people. I don’t think you begin to value what you have unless you work for it and pay for it. If we are going to give money to people for a nursing degree, for example, they need to pay it back. All the other nurses are paying for their educations. And if they are single parents, so what? When they get the degree, and have an income, they will be able to pay it back. Perhaps $100 a month over many years, but at least they’re paying it back. Grade school and h.s. are provided free, the rest is not, the country can’t afford it. I appreciate your trying to understand politics, it is interesting and frustrating all at the same time!
Posted by: Francis | November 1, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
what did one of the sagest of the founding father have to say about taxes??
“it is every citizens duty to pay as little in taxes as is possible” ben franklin
he knew ultimately that the only power the people had in curbing the the reach and power of the federal government was to keep it as wanting of money as possible- just the opposite view of the current democrat party where we they believe that it is the government duty to take as much in taxes as is possible to extend and enhance there power-
i keep running that wonderful old tune through my spinning head- “it is the end of the world as we know it”
we all know what is at the end of this road we are setting to go down-
who is john galt?? hopefully- we all are willing to be-
Posted by: day | November 1, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
well ED, i am not talking about mine. I do ask him what they have done in school and each kid that i ask, they say nothing. they can tell you what type of music their teacher listens too but they are not learning anything, like when i was in school. that is what i was saying about that. Of course it starts in the home. I dont play that. when children are in school that is suppose to be the time to learn. I dont know where you are from but i am telling you about our education system here. far as beyonce is concerned it is not punishing beyonce for us buying her cds. I said who do you tax? the single parent working 2 jobs barely making ends meet or beyonce? that is what i said. if minimum wage was increased then everyone working would be able to be taxed and maybe we could get out of our debt. Our minimum wage here is $6.55/hr which is $262/wk without taxes. my friends apartment is $585/mo. not including electric, water,gas, and misc. things you want or need. Grocery has risen high as hell. I just want change. I dont want to be the laughing stock of amongst the countries. right now we are!
Posted by: ncobama | November 1, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Voluntary transfer of wealth:
Charity is a common method of shifting wealth from those who have it to those who do not.
Forced transfer of wealth:
Some methods for this are: welfare, nationalization, slavery, taxation, socialism, inflation, devaluation, government policies, or theft.
There is a big difference between philanthropy and government mandated welfare.
BTW has anybody checked Obama’s record of charitable donations?
Shocking.
Posted by: Bob D. | November 1, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
All you have to do is go back to Illinois to see what wonderful shape the state is in. All Obama’s Democrat cronies and mentors are in office here and in full control…
Chicago-10.25% tax – highest in nation
States’ pension fund $44 billion in debt
Worst education system
Chicago – Murder capital of the US…more murders in the past year despite a handgun ban since the 80′s. This is higher than total Iraq deaths over past year.
Posted by: Sick_in_IL | November 1, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
yes it is and i am most def trying to get more understanding. well for a nursing degree i understand that. i am currently enrolled in school for early childhood ed and i have to get a loan to obtain my degree. but for a certificate you dont have to get a loan but they do have some financial assistant programs that help some parents. also it helps them with job placement.
Posted by: ncobama | November 1, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
ncobama, first when you ask your kids about school, ask for specifics, like what are you studying now in history, that can start a pretty good conversation. With kids you need to be firm. Turn off the TV’s and radios. Focus on school, that is their job. When it comes down to the single parent working two jobs, I guess that’s a result of some decisions they made earlier in their life. We all have to live with the fruits of our decisions. Some good, some not so good. Bottom line is, we are in a country that, to this point, has rewarded hard work. If your kids do very well in school, finish hs, and go on to college, and don’t just go, but fully take advantage of the education, they will be fine. Remember college is purchasing an education, however, in order to get what you pay for, you need to work very hard and get excellent grades. We are not however, liable for everyone’s mistakes.
Posted by: Ed | November 1, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Wow I am impressed with the comments. I am glad to see that, we, the hispanics that fled repression and communism in our native countries and came here to this EXTREMELY wonderful country, see Obama’s remarks as Marxist, Socialist, Leftist, and/or Communist (however you wish to call it.) My family was well to do in Cuba and lost it all over night when soldiers removed my grandfathers from their business and it became state run. Now what does Cuba have? Nothing. Same things is happening in Venezuela, Bolivia and other parts of the world. Ask any first generation Hispanic-American and they can confirm, from personal experience, that Obama’s remarks are reminiscent of Castro, Chavez and the likes. I trust this country and, God forbid, Obama wins, we need to limit his term to 4 years, one way or another. Republicans arn’t the answer, it is a balanced mix between both parties – hard to find, yes. But we can do it. Let’s pray for McCain/Palin!
Posted by: Andy | November 1, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Reality check…mostly to Obamabots.
There will be no free money.
Michelle hasn’t finished her Lobster tails and champagne…that you suckers paid for. LOL.
Posted by: Guest28409 | November 1, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Taking bets….
No News coverage of Obama Crying on 5th Nov 2008….Odds are great.
Posted by: Guest28409 | November 1, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
U.S. is full of poor fools who don’t know their own true self-interest (=SELFISHNESS). A progressive tax system is fair and helps most people, and is not socialism (ie worker ownership of the means of production, no private property etc.). In Europe people do vote for their self-interest: the poor or middle-class are not worried if the rich are paying more tax. Being more realistic, they know they likely won’t be rich in their life time (unlike Americans living in trailers, who are worried about taxes on the millions they don’t have but dream they will have). The rich actually benefit the most from the existing social system (laws on private property, incorporation, public goods, etc.) than the average Joe the Plumber does. Actually, the overall system (taxes included) must be unfair if, since the Reagan era, the gulf between rich and poor has become so obscenely wide. The rich have had it pretty good.
Posted by: john | November 1, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
John, it all comes down to what your definition of “rich” is.
Posted by: Elizabeth | November 1, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I believe that many people are not selfish, they just feel that they can spend their money more wisely than the govt. If you want to talk about selfish mr Obama, look at your own charitible contributions before you started your presidential aspirations. Many of us give our money to help family, friends, neighbors, those less fortunate and disaster victems out of our own sense of generosity. We don’t necessarily like to be spending our money on subsidized housing for your auntie who was ordered to leave the country four years ago. Perhaps you should help her with some rent or airfaire before you call the rest of us selfish.
Posted by: chris | November 1, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
john, please remember that the definition of socialism goes far beyond what you’ve stated. As far as Europe goes, they never seem too concerned about anything. If they have food and a place to sleep they seem content. Well, this isn’t Europe! We work for more than a half a day, and we like to reap the benefits of that work.
Posted by: Susan | November 1, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Oh and one more thing, I read The Fountainhead and it’s intellectual garbage. The idea that society is all about the individual, ignores the fact that scale of human history and advancement has occurred from co-operation and community, not from every man for himself (self-interest). Otherwise we would still be living in trees fighting over bananas. Related: while we’re citing books, I’ve also read the Wealth of Nations, and it is very clear that Adam Smith, as well as believing in the “invisible hand” of self-interest and collective self-seeking (aka selfishness), made it clear that public policy and regulation was required to curb the natural tendency of economic participants toward monopoly. Monopoly obviously negates any benefit of free markets, the virtues of which are touted on the basis of perfect competition.
Posted by: john | November 1, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
John, we’re glad you’re well read. Just one point as long as we’re painting the US as selfish people. Aren’t we always the first with help, and don’t we always come through with the most in donations, when another country is in trouble? Just asking…..
Posted by: Brianne | November 1, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Kelly writes:
>>
PDSimic writes: “The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gain and dividends, and that this is less then the 95% of hard working Americans pay on their income does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?”
40% of American workers pay NO INCOME TAX. There has never been a point in our history when 95% of the population has paid income taxes…..you my friend are ignorant. If you were inclined, you would know where 95% of income tax comes from….
<<
First. Name calling or shouting is not helping find out the truth.
Second, let me stand corrected and rephrase what I said in a way that should be as factual as a fact can be, so here is my comment and question for all:
The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gains and dividends, and that this puts them into the second lowest tax bracket, the one reserved for *working* people with taxable annual *income* between $8K and 32K, does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?
Here is still another way to make the same point:
The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gains and dividends, and this is lower then the income tax rate payed by any working American earning $33K or more in taxable annual income, does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
PDSimic,
I agree with you entirely on the 15% capital gains. For instance, last year Warren Buffett (one of the most charitable people on earth) commented that he paid a lower tax rate than his Excutive Assistant. As you know, his $80 million in dividends was taxed at 15% whereas income from wages and other sources are taxed based on our progressive income brackets. Fortunately, I feel Mr. Buffett will serve the needy better with his extra money than the Federal Government, but I can’t say this for most of these high dividend earners.
Posted by: Todd | November 1, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
PDSimic, firstly what is “a rich”? You need to define it. Secondly, are you saying that the person with the stocks is ONLY paying 15% on the dividends and gains…what about his or her income tax on top of that, on other earnings? Most are paying that as well. We have to have a complete picture.
Posted by: Wendy | November 1, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
I agree Guest28409!
Nobama has shown the same style dirty politics they all use to take out their opponents. For a few examples, Jim Ryan, his IL Senate opponent who was forced to step down, throwing three news orgs off the plane and replacing it with Ebony and Jet and, Joe the Plumber, investigations / banning of interviews of Barbara West and her husband as well as another station on the East coast. If you don’t agree with them, they take you out. He and his friends have made his career by Chicago-style thug politics. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree!
Posted by: Sick_in_IL | November 1, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Todd, I volunteer time on the boards of a couple of non profits, and the majority of donations come from small businesses and people whose incomes are between $250 and $750K. We are already preparing for our donations for next year to be half of this year, with demand for our services and goods to be double, due to the number of layoffs, etc. The tax increases are going to hurt non profits across the country, and there is no way the government will be able to pick up the slack with the enormous debt it’s carrying.
Posted by: Gloria | November 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I don’t think that selfishness is the right word. American people are good, generous people. It is just that they have been massively brainwashed for so long that even the otherwise reasonable and functioning people become complete zombies the moment the key word “sharing”, or “socialist”, is pressed. It would be funny if not sad, and, as the last 8 years testify, very dangerous for everybody (including the zombies themselves).
Yet, they never learn, and so a guy who is determined to give them a tax break is called names and branded a “socialist”, while the rich old guy who is proponent of the failed “trickle down” philosophy which ends every 10 years in a massive redistribution of wealth from the tax payers to the rich old guys on Wall St (who, by the way, get to keep their past multimillion dollar spoils), gets their vote…and so we can have more of the same upward redistribution of wealth again and again and again…Not this time.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Wendy,
Why do you think all of these Corporate Executives continue to receive compensation in the form of stock options. They exercise the stock options and the gains are taxed at 15%. Granted the ones that receive these outrageous bonuses do so at the highest income tax rate. By the way, they don’t exercise the option unless its a winner.
Posted by: Todd | November 1, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Posted by: len | Oct 31, 2008 11:13AM
“Just how great does the disparity of wealth have to get before the USA stops being a democracy?”
Hard to agree with you len when the super-rich are defined as people making more than $250K/year. Or is it 200K? Or 150K? Or is it 120K?
Everybody thinks of the CEOs making 100 mil., I wonder how many people are making this kind of money. I bet not too many, not even 0.1% of Americans. Then I wonder how many have started from nothing. How many were born rich? Ask Oprah, Buffett, Bill Gates. How many have worked hard and smart? Probably ALL of them.
What I’m trying to say, most rich people work hard for their money, and most rich people deserve their money. Why do you hate them?
And then are the ones that became CEOs (Fanny and Freddie) by knowing the right senator… This is what we need to stop.
Posted by: vratza | November 1, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Todd, not all execs who get stock options are getting enormous amounts. For some companies giving options is cost effective for the company, and the side benefit is an ownership component. Like it or not, companies and individuals are going to pay the least amount of taxes they can. The formula is simple. And if they are taxed more, they will donate less. The places that will suffer are the non profits who receive the donations. And I’m not sure even Obama in all his greatness, will be able to bridge the large gap.
Posted by: Wendy | November 1, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Anyone who thinks their taxes will diminish if the so-called rich are taxed more have but to remember this: Liberal Democrats don’t lower taxes. Period. President Clinton ran for office with a promise to give the middle class tax breaks, too. When elected he instituted the biggest tax increase in history. Obama supporters need to feel less and think more.
Posted by: Manny | November 1, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Gloria,
I understand that taxes are not desirable for anybody. When I was commenting on the low capital gains tax rate, I was referring to the high dividend earners not small businesses. Since small business are compensated through their salaries, dividend income is only from their personal investments which I would assume to be relatively minor.
Posted by: Todd | November 1, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Wendy writes:
>>
PDSimic, firstly what is “a rich”? You need to define it. Secondly, are you saying that the person with the stocks is ONLY paying 15% on the dividends and gains…what about his or her income tax on top of that, on other earnings? Most are paying that as well. We have to have a complete picture.
<>
PDSimic wrote:
The fact that a rich under Bush payed 15% in taxes on a stock gains and dividends, and this is lower then the income tax rate payed by any working American earning $33K or more in taxable annual income, does not seem fair and balanced tax policy, no?
>>
Regards.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Wendy writes:
”
PDSimic, firstly what is “a rich”? You need to define it. Secondly, are you saying that the person with the stocks is ONLY paying 15% on the dividends and gains…what about his or her income tax on top of that, on other earnings? Most are paying that as well. We have to have a complete picture.
”
Wendy,
I agree that word “rich” needs to be defined so we can try to understand each other. Let me try for exactly what I think.
First, I do not think that person earning 200K or a family earning 250K is rich. I do think, however, that a person that has taxable income of $1Mil these days can be considered “rich” by todays standards.
Second, to elaborate on why 250K may not be “rich”, unless you factor out cost of living – paying to live in good school neighborhood, paying for your kids college, etc – it is not accurate to talk about 250K as being “rich”. In some areas of New York State, it is comfortable living that feels like what middle class *should* be, but not more then this. It is not “rich” but it feels like 3.9% tax increase is not such a big deal. I am certainly not going to work less because of that, and if I where business owner and wanted to earn some fixed absolute amount, I would probably try to work harder and employ more people to work for me to help me achieve this goal. This only make sense, that is, until the tax rate become prohibitively large. We are far from that.
Finally, having said the above, let me explain what “rich” means in the context of my previous comment about unfairness of the capital gains and dividend tax bracket being *lower* then tax bracket of working Americans earning more then 33K in annual taxable income:
It is true that at almost any income level you will find people that will have some stock investments and some dividends, so all these people did benefit from 15% low dividend and capital gain tax. However, if you look at how much each income group actually benefits, here are the facts (SOURCE: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy)
Average Capital and Dividend Gains in dollars, per income bracket for the 99% of the people was between $579 for the 46K-77K group, and $12,338 for $154K-$396K income group.
Contrast this with the average income from Dividends and Capital gains for people in the top 1% income range ($396K and up): $233K
This makes pretty clear who really benefits from the Bush “tax cuts” as far as this aspect of his tax cut is concerned. Talking about proper incentives, note also that taxing work (income and payroll tax) should not be a priority over taxing the gains that does not come from real work – stock market investments and dividends.
To conclude, Wendy, this is what I meant by “rich” in my previous comment.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
growing. Government has a great deal of responsibility regarding jobs: He needs to create infrastructure so there can be factories, stores and companies, also needs to provide a system where companies can have access to money (credits) to grow, needs to provide healthy well prepared workers as well as employers in order to create all this wealth. Also needs to provide security and stability.
All this is for the benefit of all citizens, from the poorest to the richest.
All this costs money, large quantities of it.
Since we live in a world that tends to go towards free market, government can’t make money by doing business (in other countries government has its own companies to get some income as well as to control a certain part of the market) so, the only way for the government to get this money is from taxes.
It’s a tricky thing; because sometimes people don’t thing that by paying taxes they are actually helping themselves as well as others. Richer people think that because they use very little public services, they should pay very little taxes, or no taxes, sometimes they even go as far as saying that they should not pay taxes because they provide with employment. This is nonsense. They are what they are mainly because they are in the USA, if they would have been in most other countries they wouldn’t have reached that position, not even working hard and smart. That’s just why everybody has to pay taxes, and those who have harvested more from the USA should also pay more taxes, to ensure that the government will keep on creating opportunities for people reaching the highest position they are able to reach, to take them to their full potential. This is the only thing what taxes are for, and in a democratic country they way taxes should be spent, the priorities should represent the will of the citizens and meet the needs of the citizens.
Pay (fair) taxes, live better.
Posted by: Amilcar Alzaga | November 1, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Hay let me think,I work (8) hours a day (7) days a week so I can make my house payment and pay my bills. and the first three(3) hour of my hard day goes to ?? a you got it good old uncle Sam
Ok why don’t I just give up.. hmmm (2) more hours so the lady down the street who keeps having baby’s because she can get more money to pay for new car,and sit on her butt oh ya she has cable… why not
Its the new American way …. and school well our kids can’t read but they sure can screw…. Ya the American way indeed. They can have more baby’s live with mom and they will have even more money. Is that I worked for. Go Obama CHANGE !!!
Posted by: Ortiz | November 1, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I am utterly disappointed in what America is becoming. Instead of working hard to acheive the American dream, people choose to sit around and wait for the government to give them free money.
My husband and I are both dentists. We spent 4 years in college, then 4 years in Dental School. Dental school was both grueling and exhausting, and VERY EXPENSIVE. We graduated with more than $400,000 in student loans. Needless to say, we have worked our butts off and accrued extensive amounts of debt in attempt to acheive the American dream. We pay so much in loan payments, we are still on a very tight budget and unable to save much.
We now work 40 hours a week in a federally qualified health center treating patients on Medicaid and patients without insurance. It has been very rewarding to help these people, and we do hear some compelling stories. But most of our patients expect that the government should be paying for all of their treatment. Many of them avoid working in order to receive handouts thru Unemploymnent, Medicaid and Welfare. This is really getting out of hand. Are these the people that I should give more of my money to (even though with Fed/State/Local/Property taxes, we almost pay 50%)? People that don’t even try to be successful, since it’s much easier to let other people pay your way? What a sad day Nov 4 will be fif Obama wins. This country will fall apart…
Posted by: Mich | November 1, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Every time taxes are lowered the economy grows. When taxes are raised the economy slows. Economies are not static they are dynamic. Most of the tax plan graphs show static statistics, they are misleading. You have to look at a dynamic graph for the real truth. But you don’t need to look at graphs and charts. All you have to do is look at history. Global history proves this time and again.
Government is corrupt. If its size increases it will be more corrupt. If it has more power and money it will be even more corrupt. The more money they take the less we get in return, and the more oppressive the government will be. Government is full of elected and appointed democrats and republicans. Corruption is non-partisan. Government is the ultimate monopoly. Global history proves this time and again.
The gulf between the poor and rich will widen even more under Obama’s tax plan. Only a handful of people will be rich and the rest will be poor. In this system it only pays to be the person in power. The only way to narrow the gap is to lower taxes and shrink government. History proves this time and again.
Socially planned economies/wealth redistribution does not work. The more aggressive the redistribution scheme the more freedoms are lost, the more oppressive the government and the more disparity between rich and poor. History proves this time and again.
If you really want to help others, if you really want to help the middle-class and below, if you really believe everyone should have a fair chance, if you’re really honest with yourself, than you will at least study history. If you study and understand history and you still want all these things than you cannot vote for Obama. If you still wish to ignore history than you do not want these things for your fellow man and you will vote for Obama. You owe it to yourself and your fellow man to use your mind and find out the truth so you can make an informed vote, not an uninformed vote based on anecdotal, feel-good, one-liners, based on theories that have been proven false over and over again. You are an American, you are blessed and you can still make a difference.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Those with the largest amount of dollars did nothing to “earn” their riches. They inherited them, yet their greed wants to keep others from achieving even a comfortable existence. Instead of the “look at what I’ve got” mentality, we need to look around and see what we can do with what we have to help others.
Love, Hope, Peace, & Christ Is With Us All,
Cal-el
Posted by: Cal-el | November 1, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
kf, you are right, I started paying my taxes under Clinton, and I had to check this, and indeed the tax rate under Regan was 28%. My error, sorry about this.
However, note that Regan tax rate on dividend and capital gains was 28%, as well. In light of this, Obama proposal to let the Bush dividend tax rate of 15% expire and go back to Clinton level of 20%, is not that radical at all. It certainly does not justify all the hysteria on this board and elsewhere, name calling, and labeling him a “socialist”.
The fact is that Obama promises the tax cut for the middle class, period. That much is clear and should be acknowledged. Just a common decency.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
The more government takes and decides who and how much to give, because of their greed there will be nothing to give those that need. And sadly those that currently give on their own will have nothing to give either. History proves this time and again.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
The fact that Obama is raising many other rates on earners including dividends, capital gains, corporate, etc, has been proven to slow the economy and cause the middle-class to make less and lose jobs. The tax cut he is giving is not enough to offset the negative slowing effect of the higher taxes on earners. This slowing effect is even more pronounced if instituted during a recession. History proves this time and again.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
**Talking about proper incentives, note also that taxing work (income and payroll tax) should not be a priority over taxing the gains that does not come from real work – stock market investments and dividends.**
You’re absolutely right. Dividends and investments should be highly taxed because saving is selfish. It should be strongly discouraged, even penalized.
Posted by: Maggie | November 1, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Any tax system is a redistribution. If we can’t acknowledge this, there is no possibility for a rational discussion.
Having acknowledged this, it is just that in democracies, such as ours, the shape of the redistribution curve reflects (or better, *should* reflect) the dominant civil values of the population of a particular country.
During Clinton years the max tax bracket was 39.6%, while capital stock and dividend gains tax at 20%. During GW Bush years, tax bracket is 35%, with dividend income tax at 15%. In terms of values one could say that our tax code imposes a steep penalty on people who work for living, relative to the extremely rich, who may chose to live off their dividends and stock investments. This is not the whole story, of curse, but is something that should be noted if one is talking about incentives to work etc…
The ideological and theoretical argument is that Bush rates are better for economy because while they disproportionately benefit the top 1% of the income earners, the benefit trickles down. That’s a theory and ideology, and it is not an established fact, mainly because economy as an academic discipline, unlike natural science, is far from an exact science and is subject of easy ideological manipulation that cover its huge complexity and the relative incompetence of some of its practitioners and their dubious interpretations of “historic facts”.
For example, it is probably safe to say that today, at the end of the 8 years of Bush in office and the 35%/15% tax rate, we all are much worst off then we where in Clinton years. As a result of the philosophy and policies that Bush and McCain share – after all, they share the exactly the same group of Neo-Cons as primary advisors -, our country is at its lowest in almost all areas of national interest, the economy being the most visible to a common person.
So what this all means to a common person who works hard, hate taxes, and thinks that government is a burden that should be reduced to a minimum?
First, avoid getting emotional about theoretical and ideological arguments that you are not sure you really understand. Second, do not be a sheep that becomes hysteric when old rich man and his young rich trophy wife press the “socialist”, or, “sharing” button. Third, just look at the state of the economy today:
Looks and feels good? – vote for more of the same – John McCain!
Looks and feels terrible – vote for change, give a chance to this young, intellectually brilliant, emotionally stable, pragmatic, inclusive, and by many accounts (Powell etc.) once-in-a-life-time leader.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 1, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
If Obama wins, I think I will just quit, I have a mortgage, plus pay rent for an apartment I am living in because I have changed jobs in the last year trying to improve myself. I make a car payment and am working on paying off 2 student loans. I have been teaching school for 18 years while spending 12 in years in private business. I have learned a thing or two about how tax increases effect the economy. If Obama wins I need to quit and let the government bail me out. I won’t be a whole lot worse off than I would be working my backside off to give it to someone else. Taxation is redistribution, the only fair tax is a consumption tax. If you spend more you pay more, therefore people with more who buy more would pay more. In the mean time if Obama wins I will be expecting my check on time and my bailout to come soon.
Posted by: moteach | November 1, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Which is exactly my point, don’t vote on emotions, looks and feels good/bad. Vote on historical truth.
After advising not to vote on emotions, you go ahead and counsel everyone to vote on emotions.
Your emotions are blinding you if you are not willing to find out why our economy is the way it is today. You are at a high risk of being misled into going along with what you have been told instead of finding out for yourself.
The reasons you give to vote for Obama are all based on emotions and feelings not issues. Those are not the important reasons to choose a leader. If you base your choice on that you are destined to choose someone who will lead you into poverty.
If you really want to help others, if you really want to help the middle-class and below, if you really believe everyone should have a fair chance, if you’re really honest with yourself, than you will at least study history. If you study and understand history and you still want all these things than you cannot vote for Obama. If you still wish to ignore history than you do not want these things for your fellow man and you will vote for Obama. You owe it to yourself and your fellow man to use your mind and find out the truth so you can make an informed vote, not an uninformed vote based on anecdotal, feel-good, one-liners, based on theories that have been proven false over and over again. You are an American, you are blessed and you can still make a difference.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
This is possible. Don’t be discouraged.
Main-stream media would like you to think the election is already over. It is not! They are using the polls to mislead you.
The polls are tightening, the race is very close. McCain/Palin could be ahead in some swing states. There are stats that are being withheld that show this is possible.
People refusing to answer or falsely answering pollsters these may include many Hillary supporters and other democrats that are voting for McCain; an Obama and his campaign, media, hollywood and fraud backlash; all these events and others could come together and surprise all on election day.
These and the seminar campaign bloggers commenting here probably are all campaign tactics to disillusion you and suppress your vote. Stay motivated. This is possible. Turnout will be key. Turnout will also make all the fraud less of an issue. Use all this as motivation to get out and vote. Bring others with you. McCain/Palin!
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Maybe this election will awaken all Americans to discuss, stand up and demand our government change our tax system into a fair system that will stimulate our economy into incredible growth for all, one that will give everyone the opportunity to move into the “hated’ rich class. This could be the ultimate weapon against those that practice the divisive class warfare and agitate those they oppress just for votes. Perhaps a fair or flat tax will be the outcome. Reform is coming.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
For a guy who has been on the public dole all of his career Obama surely has a cavalier way of expecting other people to part with more of what they honestly earn. Most business owners started their own company and worked hard to be successful. What galls me is some politician who has been on the public dole all of his career deciding what that business owner deserves to keep. This is way different from some CEO who runs a company for awhile and then gets a huge payout when he leaves. There should be a stipulation in any payout agreement that the payout cannot result in putting the company in the red and cannot exceed a certain percentage of the profit for the years that the CEO was the head of the company. In years where there is no profit, no payout should be allowed or at least the loss should be averaged in with the profits for the tenure of the CEO. I cant imagine a company being stupid ehough to not have this in their company rules.
Most people go into business with certain goals in mind whether it be expanding the company, making more money for contingenmcy or personal use, providing their employees with better benefits or better salaries or whatever. If you raise the taxes on these people they will cut jobs, benefits or salaries. It doesnt take much sense to figure that out.I worked for several small businesses and thats pretty much the way it works. Obviously the Dear Leader doesnt see it that way. And another thing, if you trust Obama to keep his word on his tax promises you are nuts.
Posted by: Ken | November 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Ah, PDSimic… Don’t know if you’re still around to see this. I’m sure your arguments sound studied and logical to you, but they aren’t. Your premises are mistaken, and your conclusions are pulled from emotions and generalizations – not facts. First a couple mistakes:
A. Any tax system is a method for generating revenue for the one doing the taxing (in our discussion, the Federal government). It is *not* redistribution. Government policy may or may not include redistribution. Words matter if you want to have a “rational discussion.”
B. The USA is not a democracy. A democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner. We have a set of laws that “should reflect… the dominant civil values of the population”, but that also should conform to a basic set of principles set forth on the country’s founding documents. If you haven’t read them in awhile, you should.
Your observations about tax rates really go nowhere, because it makes some assumptions that aren’t real. That is, fat cats who sit around and live off “dividends” are favored over workers in our society. Well, that ignores the fact that most “dividends” accrue to ordinary individuals through retirement plans and the like; people who also work for a living. There are relatively few people (like Ted Kennedy) who could live off of dividends alone. Hopefully, though, if you live within your means; save during your life; and make reasonably smart decisions; you *can* get to the point where you live off of dividends.
Your conclusions also miss the point, because the real reason for keeping capital gains taxes low is that it reduces barriers to moving capital into productive places. The whole idea of a free market economy is that cash (you need it to start or grow a business) should move to productive use. It’s generally a bad thing when that’s impeded – usually by government policies enacted to favor some constituency over another.
The primary reason for different tax rates on income is because it gives politicians ways to curry favor and buy votes. The fact is that revenues to the Federal government increased after every major tax reduction in the last 50 years; from Kennedy to Reagan to G.W. Bush. It probably causes you pain that all of those reductions probably reduced rates on the highest tax payers the most. But here, a few years after the latest cuts under Bush, the proportion of taxes paid by the highest earners is greater than before the tax cuts. These are facts easily read in the government’s own reporting. So, rate reductions – even for “the rich” – have historically improved revenue to the government. And revenue is supposedly what taxes are for.
If, however, you believe that tax is for controlling peoples’ behaviors, or for rewarding (“helping”) those who can elect you, then I’m sure you like Obama’s rhetoric. So, whether Biden says it’s the “patriotic duty” of some to pay more to the government, or whether Obama calls those “selfish” who would argue against paying more; it all sounds reasonable if you think “those” people need to be punished a little for their success.
There’s one reason, and one reason only that Obama talks about raising taxes on “the rich” – there are relatively few of them, and so it’s a safe way to persuade many people to vote for him. This is a campaign. The goal is to get the most votes from the right people next week. This doesn’t make him “brilliant”, “pragmatic”, or “inclusive” – it just makes him a typical politician.
Remember (though you’re probably too young) that Bill Clinton promised a “middle-class tax cut”, but delivered a tax increase.
Posted by: CommonCents | November 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I agree with Ken on his last note about small businesses. After my first job (where a big company laid me off), I have spent the last 20+ years working in small business. I’ve owned a couple, too, though never made it “big”. Right now, I’m working for another small business where the owners have done well. They’ve probably tripled their staff over the past 10 years, and generally pay above average for the jobs they hire. They also make much more today than 10 years ago, and it’s much more than $250K.
Am I envious or jealous that they have a nice house and cars, and take better vacations? No. But I am concerned that they are holding off funding new projects (i.e. buying things and/or hiring people) because they’re not sure what will happen if Obama is elected. Basically, Obama thinks he knows better what to do with their money than they do. I disagree.
Posted by: CommonCents | November 1, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Kristkoff writes:
“Your emotions are blinding you if you are not willing to find out why our economy is the way it is today…
”
- I know, it has nothing to do with 10 billion a month Bush and McCain, where coned by their neo-con man into making us pay for pursuing an ill-advised war in Iraq.
- I know, it has nothing to do with the fact that Bush, McCain, Greenspan and the rest of the wealth-will-trickle-down gang, could not separate their ideological views – any regulation of banking system is bad, except “self-regulation” – from practical reality and their responsibilities to the American people.
- I know, it has nothing to do with banks being allowed by the same by now totally bankrupt extreme-trickle-down economic philosophy to abandon their centuries tested banking models based on lending their own money.
- I know, it has nothing to do with the credit and mortgage derivatives that have been kept unregulated by Bush, McCain, and similar economic ideologs, so banks felt careless in lend to anybody since they where allowed to turn around and sell their loans to the investment pools out of which toxic derivatives have been manufactured, and resold in different package to the global investor (which was a scam, the administration knows it, and this is why they where talking about bailing out even foreign banks with US taxpayer dollars – to prevent huge liabilities for fraud committed under their watch and possibly under their active encouragement).
- I know, it has nothing to do with the credit rating agencies who, under the influence of this administration which needed (and still needs) a huge sums of money to pursue the war, and under the funding structure that is a text-book case of the conflict of interest, where all-too-happy participants in the fraud, slapping a overly generous credit ratings to the toxic derivatives the US investment banks where selling.
- I know, it has nothing to do with the self-regulated banks being so free-wheeling and greedy that while bankers in lending department have been lending the same money over and over again, turning around an instant profit by passing the risk to the global investor, the trading floors of these same banks have been that “global investor”, that bought that garbage; which was good while the party lasted, but no regrets, that money is already spent, on private McMansions, yachts, and other life necessities that many people on this blog seem to care so much about…
I know,…, but good try, Kristokoff. And, thanks for the advise of how to vote, but, no thanks.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 2, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
PD Simic:
The first step in solving a problem is to identify the cause of the problem.
I will not repeat the excellent points made on this board and in many financial publications (see Invester Business Daily on line) regarding all the details of the recent financial crash.
Suffice it to say that Fannie and Freddie’s collapse lit the fuse, & government regulations in the form of the Community Reinvestment Act’s increasingly stringent requirements for banks to lend to those borrowers previously deemed “risky” caused the downfall of Fanny & Freddie.
This is 180 degrees from Obama’s stance that lack of government regulation caused the crisis. It was precisely because of government intervention in the free market of bank lending’s risk analysis that we got into this mess.
Facts are stubborn things.
Please stop misleading those foolish enough to listen to you as to the cause of the problem.
More regulations will only exacerbate the problem and slow the recovery.
If you can’t accept the facts, and revise your analysis, you are not a rational person, you are simply another propagandist for socialism.
Is the war in Iraq expensive? You bet. However, it has acted as a unresistable lure for the islamo facists, and drawn them into the open where they can be killed over there instead of causing another 9/11 over here. Plus, defense is one of the few legitimate functions of government.
Live free or die.
Posted by: Optimus Maximus | November 2, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
CommonCents wrote:
“Ah, PDSimic… Don’t know if you’re still around to see this…
A. Any tax system is a method for generating revenue for the one doing the taxing (in our discussion, the Federal government). It is *not* redistribution. Government policy may or may not include redistribution. Words matter if you want to have a “rational discussion.”
”
I beg to disagree. Here is why. The main use of the government tax revenue is in providing public goods and serives to the citizens. These services have obviously a market value, let say, 12K per year for security provided by police. So, a person who pays 12K income tax, and a person who pays 120K income tax, all get the same benefit. The first person got exactly what he payed for. The second person got 1/10th of what he payed for. Clearly, money is collected according to some tax rate, progressive or flat does not matter, and is being *redistributed* in the form of public goods that have market value, and present widely different percentages of the recipients incomes. This is why any known tax system is fundamentally redistribution of wealth. And this is why it is pure propaganda to claim that Obama is doing something different just because he wants to cut tax burden to middle class and pay for it (as any good conservatives would do) by cutting somewhere else, in this case, restoring Clinton era tax bracket.
Hope this clears the point ‘A’. If not, perhaps we can agree to disagree, and move on to more important areas…
Posted by: PDSimic | November 2, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Oh don’t worry about Obama’s aunt living illegally in this country while receiving welfare. I will take care of her with the money I work hard to make, so my tax money can go to pay for welfare and to provide free housing and free money to illegal immigrants like Obama’s aunt. His aunt who does not have to pay taxes. Oh, and she will get even more of my money some way or another if Obama gets into office. I mean shouldn’t we all work our butts off so people like Obama’s aunt do not have to. It will be a give and take, take money from the people doing the right things and obeying the laws to give it to the people who chose to do the wrong things and break laws.
Oh, and how nice it is that Obama’s aunt is able to get away with being an illegal immigrant, receiving state welfare benefits plus and a free ride in a state run by Obama’s buddy Deval Patrick. Coincidence or more Obama politics.
Funny, because its Obama its brushed under the rug and its not announced all over the news, and she is still getting away with this even though it has been exposed. More Obama politics and an example of things to come if we are under Obama’s leadership.
Posted by: workingclassmom | November 2, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
CommonCents wrote:
” Your observations about tax rates really go nowhere, because it makes some assumptions that aren’t real. That is, fat cats who sit around and live off “dividends” are favored over workers in our society. Well, that ignores the fact that most “dividends” accrue to ordinary individuals through retirement plans and the like; people who also work for a living.
”
As I said previously, and I stand by it because I can back it up by an official reference (see bellow), it is true that at almost any income level you will find people that will have some stock investments and some dividends, so all these people did benefit from 15% low dividend and capital gain tax. However, if you look at how much each income group actually benefits, here are the facts (SOURCE: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, 2006)
Average Capital and Dividend Gains in dollars for the 99% of the tax payers was between $579 for the $46K-$77K bracket, and $12K for the $154K-$396K income group.
Contrast this with the fact that the average income from Dividends and Capital gains for the top 1% income group ($396K and up) was $233K.
These data speaks for itself as far as who benefited disproportionately from the Bush “tax cut”, and who is to loose more then peanuts if the tax is back to 20%.
If so, and talking about our tax code reflecting our values and giving a proper incentives to people to work, I would claim that taxing a real work (income and payroll tax) should not be a priority over taxing the gains that does not come from real work – stock market investments and dividends.
As the actual data from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, referenced above, the dividends are small percentage of income for all but people in the above 396K bracket.
In fact, suppose you are fairly well to do senior, have a portfolio worth about 2 million. If carefully selected such a portfolio may be able to generate about 50K of dividends annually without taking an undue risk. If you are senior in this fairly cozy situation, and the dividends are your only source of income, under Obama plan you will pay 0% income tax. I think people like that. I don’t think this is a “socialism”.
On the other hand, if you are young and can do a real work but you prefer to live off your 2 million investment portfolio, then you should be taxed, as if this where your ordinary income. Now, don’t go for the gun, this is just me speaking. Obama plan is much less “radical” – flat 20% tax rate -, still much lower then the income tax rate for most who will ever know what a dividend is.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 2, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
I actually think Obama has this one correct. The ethics of egoism and it’s virtue of selfishness laid out in Ayn Rand’s book titled “The Virtue of Selfishness” does lead to capitalism and the politics of freedom and individual rights. The ethical system of altruism (other-ism) and it’s so-called virtue of sacrifice does lead to the socialism and the politics of slavery. That really does cut to the chase. It’s clear now that the choice is egoism/selfishness and capitalism or altruism and socialism. I love my life so I choose the system based on my nature as a human being. I choose egoism and capitalism. Too bad I don’t have a presidential candidate that supports this.
Posted by: Ragnar | November 2, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
It strikes me that the biggest problem facing this country is total ignorance when it comes to understanding economics and the ill effects of taxation and collectivism. Ironically this can be credited to government ownership of the school system…so we have people who base their fiscal policy beliefs on terms like “moral” and “right” and who believe that you can squeeze more and more out of fewer and fewer. As good an idea as this might sound, there is no example of it ever working – money flows like water; if it doesn’t provide sufficient return in this country, it leaves. If you think that is good for the country, or your collective, or YOU, then vote for either of the two major candidates.
Posted by: KSA | November 2, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Obama – no noe in this campaign will point out that selfishness is a virtue; if only they would !
Posted by: Tom | November 2, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill
for all Ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our
taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the
bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one
day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good
customers, he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer
by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our
taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink
for free. But what about the other six men – the paying customers?
How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his
‘fair share?’ They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if
they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and
the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the
bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill
by roughly the same amount, and he
proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100%
savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before And the first four
continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men
began to compare their savings.
‘I only got a dollar out of the $20′, declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,’ but he got $10!’
‘Yeah, that’s right’, exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a
dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than me!’
‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get
$10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!’
‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We
didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!’
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next
night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down
and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill they
discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between
all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors,
is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get
the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them
for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact,
they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat
friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
Posted by: Jeremy | November 2, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Obama literally makes me so upset. My family falls into his “rich” category, which is now 150K according to Joe Biden. Right now we pay a total of 48% in taxes, 35% federal tax. We give to various charities and to our church every week. We’re selfish?
Obama’s aunt and brother are living in poverty. Biden only gave $3,600 to charity within the past 9 years. And we’re selfish?
Obama’s fiscal policy will have us paying over 50% in taxes. How much more of our money does he want?
The top 10% of taxpayers pay 60-70% of this nation’s taxes. 44% of Americans who file will pay NO federal income taxes under Senator Obama’s plan. So his “95% tax cut” will give a check to those people. Let’s call it for what it is… welfare. Plus, he’s only talking about giving the middle class $500 more per year. Buy a house, a new car with that… is he serious?
Why would ANYONE raise taxes during a recession?
But people swoon every time Obama opens his mouth. What is his experience? All I hear is that he’s “inspirational and well-articulate”.Try reading between the lines and then figure what he’s about.
Posted by: Bella | November 2, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
There have been some insightful comments on this blog and some downright ignorant ones. I just want to point out a couple of the more obviously ignorant ones. First of all regarding dividends being taxed at 15%. One must bear in mind that before that dividend makes it’s way to the shareholder the earnings of the corporation have most likely been taxed at corporate level of 36% fed and 5% state ( more in some cases ) and then 15% federal at the personal level before one thin dime can be spent. That amounts to 56% and doesn’t even include all the other loads that are placed on corporations. If you are a shareholder, this is YOUR retirement…YOUR countries productivity being drained…YOUR only chance of keeping this country competitive in the global marketplace. The left wants to kill it. WHO DO YOU THINK IS THE LARGEST TAXPAYER IN THE US? EXXON MOBILE ( I am not defending CEO pay that is a separate issue that probably should be addressed. )
My point is that it is always easy for the left wing agitators to attack those who cannot defend themselves, a faceless entity like a corporation is a good target. Like a dog trained to salivate on cue, many mindlessly pile right on.
Keep this in mind; houses do not pay property taxes; homeowners do… corporations do not pay income taxes; shareholders do.
Enough of that, I am not rich and would not be effected by the Obaminator’s tax hikes except in the sense that everyone around me will be less well off which will make the lefties happy.
My pet theory is that the super rich democrats have an agenda. They are afraid the common man will figure out what they know. This includes Obama, his left wing elitist buddies and the myriad of millionaire crooks who support him. This truth is this; Even a 50% tax rate on the rich will not dent their holdings whatsoever, Why? They could never ever even spend one years interest on their money, much of which has fled offshore because of the high tax rates here compared to overseas. What they are really afraid of is that you will find out how to get their trust funds and their hidden offshore accounts form them and tax them or take them. So they “support” higher taxes. why? To keep you pacified. This kind of policy appeases the masses and builds their political power. Fact is, the bigger the government gets; the more power and more money they will have and the less you will have. Just like the old Soviet Union. Serfs have nothing, leaders have it all.
I for one pity the plight of few in this country and mostly what ails it is the constant creep of socialism/communism and whining, brought on by the decreasing standards of work, moral ethics and independence of the people. Much of this has been fostered by the idiotic concept of political correctness fostered by the media.
We live in a county where people around the world will risk their very lives just to live here and yet the left agitators find so much to whine about. I would venture a guess that none of the left wing posters on this board have lived in a far left socialist or communist country. Because if they had, and lived there like a native, they would be singing a different tune about all this tax and spend baloney. It has been proven over and over and over that it does not work because it is not efficient and the people in the government eventually find a way to steal all the money. I could argue all day long with these knuckleheads and never ever convince them of anything. They have somehow convinced themselves that they deserve something they have not earned, and it is certainly someone else’s fault. I suggest we allow them to immigrate to North Korea for a few years and then let them report back to us on the virtues of socialism!
Posted by: comrade | November 2, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
PD Simic,
Thank you for posted an intelligent entry! I was beginning to lose faith in the ability of our country’s constituency to think! I liked your reference to the “button pushing”. This administration and its new “talking piece” prey on peoples’ ignorance by slinging “idealogical” (not proven) rhetoric around that pushes emotional buttons and causes people to actually want to vote for what is not good for them.
The McCain camp slings around the “tax and spend” “anti-big-government” anti-liberal rhetoric and people buy it despite the fact that the facts point to a governmental administration that has spent like no other. The Bush administration has given us a 10 Trillion dollar debt! We spend a fortune in Iraq every day of tax dollars. The Republicans want to cry out that Democrats will take away our freedom because they want to increase taxes on people earning over 600,000.00 a year, and yet this is the same administration that, in the name of the Patriot Act has taken away liberties previously protected by our constitution via wire-tapping etc. The wealthy corporate lobbyists have time and time again used their power to pressure our government to pass legislation (including the Bush tax cuts and multiple examples of de-regulation) to benefit their only special interests, not the working people of this country, and the irony is that at the same time, they’ve managed to hoodwink and bamboozle many of your true hard-working Americans into thinking they are preserving your best interest. It’s a scam.
Many of you are feeling the pinch of our economy and you need someone to blame, and this administration seeks to point the blame away from themselves and towards their competition, and manages to sell their trickle down nonsense such that many of you want to vote for more of the same. Under the Bush economic philosophy, peoples usable income is down, inflation is high (if cutting taxes stimulate the economy, then why is our economy suffering so much after 8 years of Bush tax cuts?), unemployment is high, and home values are down.
AS PD Simic so intelligently points out, any tax system is redistributionistic. I will add that taxes are necessary for many services that we all need such as law enforcement, national defense, paying for infrastructure such as roads, etc. and many programs that few would dispute such as the public educational system. How we tax people, however, can make a difference.
Obama does not want to raise everyone taxes. On the contrary. Look it up. Obama wants to lower the taxes of people making under 250,000.00/year, and if you compare Obama and McCain’s tax plans, you will see that the Obama cuts are designed to help those who are really stretched to make ends meet; hard-working people. McCain’s tax cuts for the working person are a joke. In the lowest tax bracket, his taxes will give an average of $19.00 per year in tax cuts. Obama’s plan for the same bracket gives a $567.00 tax cut. On the other hand, in the highest bracket his tax cuts will give people earning over 2.87 million a year an average of 269,304.00 dollars in additional tax cuts!!! And they have so many hard-working Americans convinced that this is a better plan. Pretty clever bunch.
Posted by: Caroline | November 2, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
To clarify: On the other hand, in the highest bracket his (McCain’s) tax cuts will give people earning over 2.87 million a year an average of 269,304.00 dollars in additional tax cuts!!! And they have so many hard-working Americans convinced that this is a better plan. Pretty clever bunch.
Posted by: Caroline | November 2, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Most Americans choose their candidates on historical facts and reality and which candidate is closest in line with that and their values. If you choose your candidate based on feelings and which one is calm, cool, a good speaker, etc. you’re destined to choose a candidate that will lead you into poverty.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 2, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Tom wrote:
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill
for all Ten comes to $100….
Talking about McDisney land here, eh Tom?
Ok, suppose now that all these zombies need for their and their family’s physical survival in McDisney country is one beer per day for papa-zombie. If papa zombie does not have his beer, his kids will turn mean, will drop from school and will start robbing the beer joints because in McDisney country, the beer is essential for physical survival of zombies. Everyone knows this is a bottom line.
Ok, to make it bit more realistic, suppose 10th zombie, the richest zombie of all – call him a Master zombie – owns most of the bear stores, where beer sells at 10$ a bottle, while it cost him to make it over sea $0.5 a bottle. To make it realistic, he can do this because his friend, “John The Maverick”, a Master class zombie himself, whose wife is “Cindy The Beer Barnes”, got him a sweet deal through his old pal, “Cheney the VP” (who really is “Cheney the Real PP”).
Anyway, he is happy to bring the party over for a beer every day and pay 59$ because by doing this he nets $41 in revenue and after subtracting 10 x $0.5 = $5 cost of a beer, he nets $36 in pure cash profits every day after day, after day… (remember, due to his sweet deal with “Cheney The PP”, his business was able to fire all the class 1-6 zombies and go over-sea to make beer for $0.5)…
Now, he is happy with his life, zombie the Master, because God have blessed him with sweet golden goose arrangement, which sucks the money (and life) out of everybody else, and pumps it into his Cayman Island accounts. Still, he is bit of a paranoia about keeping his big arbitrage machine secret, so he goes into an attack the moment somebody proposes even a slight change in rules. He does not really care about paying 45% or 35%, it is just that he knows that once the rules are seen as changeable (and not God given), the lesser, good-for-nothing zombies may get a wrong ideas…
And what is happening with rest of his beer pals, 5th of which maybe “Joe The Plumber”? Here it is, in short:
“Zombie The 9th” and “8th” pay more then the price of beer. The are loosing money, they mostly know it, and they increasingly don’t like it…
“Zombie The 5th-8th”, pay 2, 6, 14, and, 24 times more for their beer than it really cost – they too are being ripped off by the Master zombie. Worse, the cost they pay for a beer is pretty much all they got from their hard work (most of them work as hard if not harder then Master zombie).
They are told that all this sacrifice will pay off one day if they just keep dreaming of achieving the McDisney Land Dream. So they work hard, and are happy to have a beer with Master zombie. They figure, if Master is having beer with them, he is one of them, so they prey for him, vote for him, look up at him, and hope that one day they will,…,ok, if not they, their kids may,…, ok, if not their kids, their grand-children ought to become Master zombies too…
Ok, the story line could continue, and in fact it becomes even more interesting, and realistic…but you got the point, and I have no more time now, got to go to Arizona, it is a long flight from here, don’t ask me why…It is a secret. I’ll just tell you this : something wonderful is going to happen in Arizona this Thu…
Good Luck to everybody :))
Posted by: PDSimic | November 2, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Hi comrade,
I agree with you that in government corruption is rampant, and that as you say about socialistinc countries, “everybody eventually finds a way to steal money”. It’s rampant in our democracy as well…one strategy being the occurance of “kickbacks”. Corruption is a really problem. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I disagree, though, that “everyone” does this. And I think it’s important not to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Pure unregulated capitalism holds the seeds of it’s own corruption. That’s why some oversight and regulation is necessary. It’s more of the need for “balance of powers” that our founding fathers sought in establishing our Constitution. Capitalism must exist in balance with some oversight that exists to prevent exploitation of the common good. Read about Teddy Roosevelt who was a Republican who recognized the value of the free market but also the need to regulate it. We can’t just get rid of governement because there is a tendency for it to become corrupt. We just need to maintain a balance of power and vigilance over all the branches and actively work for the government we want at all times.
This is why Obama is so needed. He is a visionary. He believes in creating transparency using the internet to hold Washington more accountable. This will not fix everything, but it’s a step and an example of innovative and forward thinking. He is a clip from an article about the bill he co-sponsored with Republican Senator Coburn and which was passed.
WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Barack Obama (D-IL) and Tom Coburn (R-OK) today hailed the Senate’s passage of the “Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act,” a bill that will create a Google-like search engine and database to track approximately $1 trillion in federal grants, contracts, earmarks and loans.
“By helping to lift the veil of secrecy in Washington, this database will help make us better legislators, reporters better journalists, and voters more active citizens,” Obama said. “It’s both unusual and encouraging to see interest groups and bloggers on the left and the right come together to achieve results. This powerful grassroots alliance shows that at the end of the day, Americans want to see Congress work together to get something done and not continue to engage in the partisan gridlock that so often brings Capitol Hill to a grinding halt.”
“Every American has the right to know how their government spends their money, and then to hold elected officials accountable for those decisions. I applaud my colleagues for unanimously supporting a bill that will aid the American people in that effort,” Dr. Coburn said. “This bill is a small but significant step toward changing the culture in Washington. Only by fostering a culture of openness, transparency and accountability will Congress come together to address the mounting fiscal challenges that threaten our future prosperity.”
“The group that deserves credit for passing this bill, however, is not Congress, but the army of bloggers and concerned citizens who told Congress that transparency is a just demand for all citizens, not a special privilege for political insiders. Their remarkable effort demonstrates that our system of government does work when the people take the reins of government and demand change,” Dr. Coburn said.
This is an example of the kind of progressive thinking we need.
Posted by: caroline | November 2, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Caroline
I can agree with you that some government is needed. My thoughts are less is more, and of course I believe I am right. But I don’t say that on a whim; all world evidence backs that up. Today our choices are more (McCain ) or way way way more ( Obama )
I am glad you brought up Teddy Roosevelt, he was well know as a trust buster intended to foster free market capitalism. That is a worthy use of government
You say He believes in creating transparency ( Obama ) . Did you know McCain was one of the sponsors of that bill, you didn’t mention that. Convenient. They may have taken that idea from Palin, as she put the entire Alaska budget online, did you know that?
More importatntly, if Obama believed in transparency he would come clean and discuss his relationships like how he came right out of law school and bought a million dollar house soon thereafter with the help of a convicted felon to whom he has extensive ties. I could go on and on and on with ACORN and other issues. He cannot come clean on all of this because he is guilty as hell. That is why he would not debate McCain in an open format. Had to restrict the questions. My gosh he has stolen his tactics directly out of “Rules for Radicals” by Alinsky. Obama is probably the most corrupt political figure to hit the presidential scene. I could go on and on.
Regarding Pelosi I don’t if she is corrupt or just retarded but the two of them together could push this country to a point where it would never recover and I mean that seriously.
Example: They ( Obama and Pelosi ) support and promise to pass a bill the will remove non union members in a vote, the right to a secret ballet. What this amounts to is the union members being able to legally intimidate potential members into voting in a union. This is a perfect example of the Gestapo tactics these Nazis are going to try to apply. This flies directly in the face of everything we stand for in this country and the rights that many many thousands of solders have died to protect on your behalf. http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/28/parties-lock-horns-over-union-efforts-to-end-secre/print/
This would be equal to the republicans posting goons at the voting booth on Tuesday to intimidate and insure you vote republican. Does that seem fair? How many examples of this kind of thing do you need? This is just a taste of their agenda. I guess if all people are created equal you Democrats are just a little more equal!
What is even more scary is that he has so many hoodwinked it is mind-blowing! Not since 1933 have so many people been so foolish.
If that crook gets elected, god help us all.
Comrade
Posted by: comrade | November 2, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Obama’s economic tax plan and his promised massive spending increases combined with the additional bailout and other massive spending plans of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank and many other democrats in congress will actually do what H Hoover and FD Roosevelt did to cause and prolong the great depression. It is unbelievable that these politicians are willing to ignore history and possibly destroy the lives of millions of Americans.
Obama and the way he runs his campaign are in direct contradiction to anyone who wants to have a transparent government. He is one of the most secretive and non-transparent politicians around. Think about it. How much do you really know about him? Not much.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 3, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
It is rather remarkable that the US economy came out of the recession that began toward the end of the Clinton administration and has been growing for the past 8 years, despite high gas prices, the weak dollar, the September 11 terrorist attacks, the Iraq war, the worst congress ever, too high state and local taxes, the housing market bubble bursting bringing to light the housing and financial scandals and the media and politicians only reporting negative information about the economy. Only reporting negative economic information affects consumer confidence, which is an important factor that affects our economic growth. A recession is negative growth for two full quarters. The growing economy can be attributed to President Bush’s tax cuts over the last eight years. Historical data shows the GDP has had unexpected growth for the past 8 years and the unemployment rate has been close to the lowest levels.
Areas with high state and local taxes have had economies that are slower and even recessed like Michigan. States with lower taxes generally have better economies.
The housing market/financial bubble burst this September causing a national recession. Data will most likely confirm this economic recession when it is available.
http://kristokoff.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
The only way to lower a deficit and balance the budget is to cut spending and lower taxes to increase economic growth and create jobs. If this is done the government actually gets more tax revenue than if they raise taxes. Doesn’t it make you wonder why so many politicians’ first reaction is to raise taxes? That will only slow the economy and actual tax revenue will decrease. History proves this over and over.
The tech bubble caused the good economy during the Clinton administration. The tech bubble and the lower capital gains tax which actually brought in more tax revenue allowed the deficit to be lowered. When the tech bubble burst towards the end of his administration the economy could not withstand the high tax burden and went into a recession. If the other tax rates where lower the economy would actually have been even better and possibly would not have gone into a recession. Historical data shows this.
There is regulation in government, a whole lot of it. It is a myth that Bush and republicans want to do away with all regulation. They just want to take away or reform the regulation that is actually causing problems. Some of it is a major contributor to the housing/financial crisis. It is ironic that many democrats in congress are on record covering up the corruption and ignoring the oversight recommendations. The problem is not that there is no regulation or that there is not enough. The problem is that it is corrupt. Adding even more corrupt regulation to already corrupt regulation will make everything worse. The idea is to have regulation and oversight that works and doesn’t cause more problems than it solves.
Everyone knows there is incredible wasteful spending in Washington. They could run the government and all its programs with a little over half the amount of money they use now. If you cut out wasteful spending, end programs that are not needed, streamline other programs and cut out fraud and corruption you could save even more. There is no need to ever raise taxes on anyone. They should actually be lower.
The only reason our economy is able to withstand our massive and corrupt government is because of capitalism and freedom. The more redistributive our tax system gets, the higher our taxes get, the more nationalized type programs creep into government and the closer we get to a socialist type centrally planned system our economy will be less and less able to withstand the increased size and corruption of government. We will eventually be crushed by the top-heavy, corrupt and massive government.
How can you expect the corrupt to clean up corruption? Since no one seems to want to fix these things. The only thing left to do is make government smaller and lower taxes, to elect those that say they want to reform government, cut spending and taxes. We need to reject those that want to increase spending and taxes of any kind.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 3, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
American people are good, generous people. It is just that they have been massively brainwashed for so long that even the otherwise reasonable and functioning people become complete zombies the moment the key, “sharing”, or “socialist”, is pressed. It would be funny if not sad, and, as the last eight years testify, very dangerous for everybody (including the zombies themselves).
Yet, they never learn, and so a brilliant guy who is determined to give them a tax break is called names and branded a “socialist”, while the rich old guy who is proponent of the failed “trickle down” philosophy which ends every 10 years in a massive redistribution of wealth from the tax payers to the rich old guy on Wall St (who, by the way, get to keep their past multimillion dollar spoils), gets their vote…and so we can have more of the same upward redistribution of wealth again and again and again…Not this time.
Posted by: PDSimic | November 3, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
PDSimic
You know not what you say.
Can you name one socialist economy the is not a natural resources ( gifted ) economy that could even buy the stuff we throw away each day? The answer is no. Because there are none. You live in one of the richest countries in the world and you want to emulate the most impoverished! Spend some time in Mexico, or any of those other countries that have tried these social experiments. You will not like what you find.
Bigger government equals bigger corruption especially when you have a general public like ours that knows who won last season on survivor but cannot even name the speaker of the house? NUTS I say NUTS I personally think McCain is about half socialist but Obama is a Marxist.
You have been duped. Obama is only after power and the way to get it is to stir up the people that think, they somehow have something more coming to them. Why do they think that? Because he told them so! Try reading ” Rules for Radicals” ( how to gain power ) this is his blueprint. Seriously.
Posted by: comrade | November 3, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am
The best defense against being brainwashed by “brilliant” politicians is to learn from history. If a candidate’s views contradict these historical facts they should be rejected.
History proves that too many candidates promise tax cuts but raise them instead. This politician is actually promising tax credits on some and higher taxes on others. If someone is promising to raise taxes on some that is even more of a reason to expect higher taxes for all. History would have to be ignored to believe higher taxes on those that create jobs would actually benefit those that have jobs and wish to someday create jobs.
Labels can be put on others, but the label is not important. It is what they do, have done and plan on doing in relation to historical data that determines if they are a bad choice to be the leader of the free world. You may argue about what to call their actions and plans all day if you want.
Those of you that study history realize that failed policies that are in use around the world by countries with weaker economies, poorer citizens, oppressive governments, less freedoms, less charitable giving by citizens are slowly creeping into our government. As these policies are implemented things get worse, we are slowly inheriting these attributes. Do the proponents of these policies seek to make our great country more like these other countries? Do they realize that they are weakening our country? Do they seek to make us less powerful? The leaders of some of these countries are beginning to realize why we are the great country we are and they are trying to change. Ironic that they choose our best attributes, while we may be choosing their worst.
Our founding fathers may be the first to ever learn from history and devise the constitution, our form of government and economic structure. Our constitution and capitalism take human nature; greed, corruption and the human spirit and put it to work for the good of everyone. It and a free people are two of the reasons the United States has become one of the most successful and powerful countries today, the center of the financial world, the dollar being the standard of currency, the most charitable country, etc. History proves time and again and is still proving this everywhere you look.
We must be ever vigilant against the attacks of those that would destroy our nation from within, sometimes by seemingly harmless and incremental steps; by those that would use the fear and uncertainty brought on by financial crisis against us, to call for change, a change that will ultimately allow the few wealthy ruling elite to oppress us all. The great depression and its aftermath, which continues to this day, seem to be a history lesson few of us are willing to learn.
Posted by: Kristokoff | November 3, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
I can’t belive that Obama would try to destroy coal plants which provide 50% of our electricity. Our electricity will go up tremendously and unemployment the economy and the entire nation will be hurt by this poor excuse of a man. there are so many concerns for obama, where is his birth certificate? Is his aunt here illegally,
why is he so friendly with our enemies, wwhy is his reputation as senator only
hurt the people he represented. please people think about your future and your children and grandchildrens’ future.
how dare obama to call us selfish because we don’t want to pay more taxes, was obamalying when he said he would cut taxes for the middleman…oh he forgot to tell you he was going to raise your electric and put people out of work and put us in a depression…people think vote against someone who will take away our freedom and destroy everything we have worked for .
Posted by: debbie in PA USA | November 3, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
While people work day in and day out to acquire values; fundamentally they hold the achievement of personal gain to be evil. Reject this hold of guilt and be proud. Then your are free. It is only your own condemnation that binds you.
Posted by: Mark Dohle | November 3, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Note that Warren Buffet, who is no “socialist”, supports Obama and has high prize for his economic plan. I don’t think people on this net should double guess Warren B. on what is good for the economy an capitalism of this country.
Posted by: sdahl | November 4, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
In fact Obama’s reference to “selfishness” does not refer to you. On the contrary, when he was talking about you – a working & middle class – he was talking about *lowering* your taxes. While you may have a problem to trust “that one”, it is healthy to acknowledge that this is what he is arguing for.
On the other hand, when he mentioned making virtue out of “selfishness” he was clearly talking about John McCain’s and Palin’s unfair charge that lowering the taxes to middle class is “socialism”. When financial elite, people like John and Cindy McCain, Bush, Cheney, and their pals who own this country make charges of “socialism” when somebody wants to cut the taxes for the working & middle class, it is reasonable to assume that motivation behind their hysteric name calling is a conflict of interest, no?
Here is what else Obama said:
“…it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise…”
Now, I would say that these words are true, both as an expression of the shared values of a huge majority of good people in this country, and economically.
You may disagree and call Obama names for saying such a radical things, and I don’t think anybody should call you selfish or something along these lines, but, please,…think what your mommy would say?
Posted by: PDSimic | November 4, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Observations of the young
By an older American well only 50 so not that old
I am not even close to middle class
And I am not even close to being rich
I work real hard – way to hard.
I support many and create jobs and knowledge.
In the young I see for the most part a bunch of lazy around me
Who want more than the could afford or are willing to work for.
But then again maybe maybe I am wrong in what I see
and they are disenfranshised instead.
After all they were handed most of what
they have up until now by their parents
and could see how to work and afford
to have what their parents have.
I wanted smaller government – always have.
They now want bigger government – they are entitled.
Now you must learn from a new leader and not their parents
and HE DID Say It Was Going to Be Hard – like your parents.
SO I AM NOW SO
Glad to see the young trust in goverment
- I mean Obama
Obama said now it is government
for the people; by the people,
as our founding fathers said.
He also said it was going to be real hard work
and of course much higher taxes for the rich.
But don’t worry you all can also
be rich in a America and someday you can
and help pay for and support the middle class to.
So please work hard young American’s you deserve
all you can get in America.
After seeing some of the young aroung me at work I am finally real glad to see that
they are going to get out of bed and work long hours for more money so that some day they course
can pay more taxes so that they can have all that they strive to have with our new Obama government.
Yes, you want heath insurance so you must pay for it – Hard Work.
Yes, you want your children to go to college then you must pay for it – Hard Work.
Yes, you wantt all that you parents have – Hard Work.
Nothing in America was ever had for FREE – Hard Work.
So again I am real glad to
see that maybe the young will buy a older used car instead of the new or newer used car that they could not afford
but still wanted anyway even after you parents warned you.
I am glad to see they are going to rent intead of thinking of buying the BIG house
they could not afford right away.
I am glad to see that they do not need the newest an best gadget that comes onto the market
and can do with the older or used one instead.
I am glad so to see that the young will not be buying a new Big Screen TV
which would keep them from having all of the above
and decide to keep the old TV for a few more years. Heck it still works
Obama did say it was going to be hard.
Heck the rich will buy enough TV’s anyway and drive the price
down for you so you can afford and pay less when you are ready
and can afford it.
I am also real glad to know that with all of you new pay raises and jobs you will be getting
because you are middle class and entitled – that finally you will be GETTING of your lazy a_____
bed and will be doing so much more.
Obama said it was going to be Hard
Thank You Young Americans
trust in your government – I mean Obama
Maybe I can retire now. Will you support me?
Posted by: Rick | November 5, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
There is no free lunch. Obama is lying. Wealth distribution cannot help the economy by making people want to “buy things”, it can only hurt it by removing the incentive to earn. The rich can consume as well as the poor, and they have a better idea of what to consume (that’s how they got rich!). Any redistribution necessarily shrinks the pie.
Posted by: ragnar_rahl | November 10, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I find it humorous that the advocates of redistibution and envy, in my mind, don’t have the guts and determination to go out and make yourselves, the vast sums you wish to give to their beloved comrades. It is still possible to bust your ass and make a pile of dough. Why don’t you leftists walk the walk and be consistent with your ideals. It is simply your feelings of inferiority and jealousy that cause you to continually attack the doers/achievers, etc. How is it that if I pay 10 and 20 times the taxes that most of you do, that I am the unfair one?
I take care of myself, my family and my employees. You are not my children, and since I did not bring you into the world, I am not responsible for you.
I risk my net worth on a daily basis and therefore, I deserve the reward or the failure. Get some guts and get into the game. Until the recent economic downturn we have had the most vibrant economy in the history of the world. How many of you redistributionists have taken a second job to save for a rainy day or started a side business? Not many, I would wager.
There should be a cover charge to live in America; one flat fee per individual. Figure it out. I owe no more than any other individual. And don’t give my that crap that I have had any more benefit than anyone else from living in America. My grandparents were all uneducated legal immigrants and I put myself thru college. Opportunity is made by those who want it.
Posted by: Charles | March 1, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Selfishness is:
–saving up for a down payment on the home with room enough for your family
–plowing your life savings into the business you’ve always dreamed of starting
–putting in overtime and taking second jobs to send your kid to college (or that private elementary school when the public school is too dangerous or unchallenging)
–sending money to the charities that you believe in
–putting away money on a regular basis so that you can live as independently as possible when you retire
–having money so that you can take care of your loved ones when they fall ill
Selfishness makes me a good provider for my family and my community. Selfishness makes me a responsible citizen who tries to go as far as I can before I have to ask my fellow taxpayers for help.
Selfishness makes me a proud and dignified human being, confident in my abilities and my character.
So, yeah, I’m proud to be a Selfish American.
Posted by: Selfish American | April 15, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“…it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise…”
If it boils down to no one may prosper until everyone prospers, then it means never. Obama is an economic illiterate with no grasp of human nature or any notion of justice. He’s the worst thing to happen to this country in generations — maybe in history.
Posted by: cheeflo | April 22, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
credit card merchant account Can help you save money for those who have or would like to open a business.
Posted by: lexi | November 22, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
when it comes to sponging off their wealthy parents the gop are all for spreading the wealth.pay for your own ivy league college working for 7.25hr gop.oh thats right,mommy and daddy will pay for it.pay for your own healthcare and pensions.oh thats right,that kind of socialism is ok.and by the way democrats,file the papers and pay the higher taxes yourselves!practice what you preach!
Posted by: dwl4825 | May 29, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am