Palin Again Chides Biden’s ‘Crisis’ Comments

Give it up AIR HEAD, Go learn The United States Constitution! or Better yet go on another 150,000 dollar shopping spree, or I know learn that ALL PARTS OF AMERICA IS AMERICA! AND NO MATTER WHOM YOU SUPPORT IN THIS ELECTION YOU ARE AMERICAN! Or Maybe you can go back to Alaska and Keep an Eye on Russia from your house!

The republican have nothing left….They both are grabbing at thin air…………

Obama is another crisis!
It seems that Miss Angie thinks that Sarah Palin is an “airhead”.
Well Angie, show us your resume’. What makes your precious opinion matter? What have you done to become the authority of airheads? Or is it that you are the typical hate spewing liberal just doing your best to silence everything you disagree with. You must just hate the Constitution don’t you.

Obama says he will raise Joe the Plumber’s taxes and “spread the wealth around.”
What more do voters need to reject Obama?
————————
How about an accurate account of what Obama said he will do for “Joe the Plumber” to start.
His taxes will go DOWN under Obama’s plan. Get it? The guy will get a TAX CUT.
And as far as a “crisis”.
McCain would have to “suspend” all govenmrnt is ANY crisis apparently, just like he “suspended” his entire campaign just to make a simple vote.
And even then, his own party didn’t follow his lead. Pretty pathetic.
We don’t need another knee-jerk reactionary in the White House.
And what executive experience does McCain have anyway? HINT: The answer is NONE.

Just the same old stuff from the Republicans, more Obama/Biden bashing and creating mountains out of molehills. They are running scared. This is the reason they are losing. They continue to bash the opposition instead of addressing the people’s needs. Keep it up! Can’t wait for Obama to win the election!

“Life, Liberty , Pursuit of Happiness…whenever a government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.”
Is that “REAL AMERICAN” enough for Ms Palin?
Our government HAS become destructive to these ends and we ARE going to alter it by changing our leadership.
Time to end the chapter on neo-con cronyism and neo-facist ideology.
SEE YA PUBS!

The Haaretz Article, Top Iran officials recommend preemptive strike against Israel, has triggered the need to repost an article that I wrote some time ago about a dream I had when Iran was testing their missiles. I light of Sen. Biden’s recent remarks that Obama would be tested by our enemies, I ask the question, “What would Obama do?”
http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/what-would-obama-do-haaretz-article-top-iran-officials-recommend-preemptive-strike-against-israel/

Don’t be fooled, DJK. Either one, Obama or McCain, will be tested. The question is who do you want answering the 3 am phone call? A cool, calm, reasoned, intelligent person or a hotheaded, impuslive reactionary?

I commend this blog for at least printing Gov. Palin’s exact statements. While many media outlets twist her every word to try to create a “potatoe” moment, here at least we allow the reader to interpret her exact words–that’s all that a fair and objective viewer can ask of a media outlet.
Thanks for the forum.
Vin at http://www.wegotsarah.com

LOL, good one Bridge!

McCain = DISHONORABLE; Palin = SCARY!!!

Why is the American media focused on all the word games the campaigns are engaged in trying to untangle Biden’s latest gaffe?
WE NOW KNOW AL QAEDA has just come out in support of McCain, why isn’t that the story??
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4989853.ece

Angie – Did you watch the VP debate? Biden does not know what the role of the VP is either. 36 years in gov and head of the judiciary commitee and he says the powers of the VP are vested in Article 1 of the consitiution??? Nobama’s campagin will not even allow him to talk to the media or supporters at events and you call Plain stupid?

The Angry Republicans are at it again…can’t wait until Obama wins, so they will just shut up!! Then again, the whiners will never go away. remember, these are the same idiots that voted for George W. Bush TWICE!!!

I wouldn’t expect someone who thinks being able to see Russia from their house is foreign policy experience to understand the nuances of an intelligent senator’s comments, much less offer thoughtful discussion on the topic. If you’re buying her line, you’re ignorant, willful or not. And would she be willing to guarantee that if McSame is elected, there would be *no* crises for him to deal with? I’d *love* to hear her explain that.

BYE BYE REPUBLICANS!! your regime is OVER

Oh Angie quit reciting the dnc talking points, they really make you look like a fool.
Did you know that Sarah Palin was discussing the job of Vice President to a grade schooler??? Do most grade schoolers know what the term “PRESIDES” mean?
Did you know that the Vice President is the President of the Senate?
Did you know that the job of Vice President can be whatever the President wants it to be by assigning more roles for the V.P.?
I take it you didn’t know a single one of these FACTS. It’s ok, you’re a lying liberal full of hate. I know. But really you shouldn’t recite your talking points on here, go to yahoo or something where you can run into someone as ignorant as you.

Gotta love the spin:
“It was always the intent that the clothing go to a charitable purpose after the campaign” (McCain-Palin spokesperson Tracey Schmitt).
HaHa! What a waste of energy and natural resources. Why not just shop at a reasonably priced store and donate the MONEY to a worthy cause – like say, paying for Palin’s kids to go traveling with her?
Palin/McCain are not Eco-Friendly!

A-Men on the air head– after Nov. 4th you can go back to Alaska and put that lipstick on your pit bull and keep an eye on Russia..

Sarah Palin: “Perhaps the crisis the Obama Campaign fears the most is Joe Biden’s next speaking engagement” BWahhahhhahhhahhh
When was the last time Joe the Gaff had a press conference?

DRAKE
The Vice President does not GO IN AND HELP THE SENATE WITH POLICIES TO TRY AND MAKE PEOPLES LIVES BETTER AS SARA HAS PUT IT did you watch the Video of her Interview on this SHE IS AN AIR HEAD!

Sarah Palin took money from oil companies and spread it around to the citizens of Alaska, sending out thousand dollar checks to every person in the state. Sarah Palin is a SOCIALIST! Sarah Palin played ROBIN HOOD! Where’s my check Sarah?!? How about spreading some of that wealth my way???

Tested? Let’s look at what the next President inherits:
2 wars
The possibility of a nuclear Iran
Recession
Deteriorating relations with Russia
North Korea

Who do you want to access to the “football” which has the missile launch codes?
Obama = cool, calm, intelligent, reasoned
McCain = angry, impulsive, confrontational, bomb Iran

“His taxes will go DOWN under Obama’s plan. Get it? The guy will get a TAX CUT”
Joe doesn’t care. Joe doesn’t like Obama’s plan which is socialism. Joe would prefer to earn his own money rather than have obama steal it from someone else. Joe doesn’t want Obama stealing his money either.

It’s almost over…then everyone can complain about the newly elected government. Fortunate for us…we do have a choice no matter what the other guy says or tries to insult ones intelligence. We are all in this together and regardless who is elected…there will be hell to pay for the corrupted greed that has grown from our current lack of transparency in our Federally secured financial institutions and predatory loaning as well as the speculation with oil futures. Paying at the pump and sky rocketing mortgages. This will take the impossible to unravel by the next administration and I don’t see any of them any brighter or uninvolved with lobbyist.

“Senator Obama is very capable of handling any crisis that faces our great nation”
Joe Biden said he isn’t.

….and Guiliani, Romney, Paul and Huckabee all said McCain does not have the temperment to manage a crisis.

Needless to say, Biden’s comments were idiotic. I think we know why he is running second on this ticket. But having Palin deliver this message shows how strategically stupid the McCain campaign is as well. If we buy the argument that our enemies are bound to test an inexperienced President, who isn’t watching Palin and saying to themselves ‘Then we really better hope you don’t become President.’
And If I were to try to clarify Biden’s comments, I would say that it is a good thing; Obama is under no delusion that our enemies aren’t going to test a new President and with that perspective, we should be reassured that he is prepared to take decisive action if a crisis does arise even shortly after he takes office.

Hey Jones-
Whats black and blue and hates sex? One of Palin’s kids in the trunk of McCain’s limo!
BUHAHAHAHA

Why do neoconservatives call a Republican tax reduction ‘genius’, but a Democratic tax reduction, a cut for all of us who write these posts, is considered ‘stealing’, or socialism?
Obama will let the tax cuts effected by Bush expire for the rich; i.e. those whose NET, ADJUSTED, TAXABLE (AFTER EXEMPTIONS)INCOME IS $250K. He will repeal those cuts. The average Joe (or is it Samuel?), plumbing license or not, will KEEP the Bush tax cuts. Going from protecting the greedy, to a more equitable (fairer, for non-elitists) plan. It is we who see our hundreds of thousands of sons and daughters go to war, usually to protect us…or to protect Bushies and other oil-greedy, power hungry, trickle-downers. It is we who fill the offices, factories, plants, small businesses, and farms of this country by the million to get the jobs done. It is we who have seen our earnings stagnate during the last eight years while the rich got richer. And it is we who are bailing out the avaricious (greedy) fools who brought our economy to its knees.
I am a small business man for Obama-Biden. Without a prosperous economy, my business stinks. During the Clinton years, I made a ton of money and gladly paid my taxes, and was able to invest my savings. the money I made in the stock market more than offset any taxes I had paid; but I was still making under $250K/year. The Democratic fiscal policy under Bill Clinton allowed me to open 2 new stores, creating around 10 more jobs also. Since Bush and Katrina, everything has gone to hell.

Keith ,
You are clueless the world does not fear Obama they see him as a sheep they see McCain as someone not to cross and that quality by itself makes McCain a better leader.

Governor Palin is running to be VP under an experienced and accomplished American Hero John McCain who wants to be President.
George W. Bush will no longer be President come January. For Sen.Obama to constantly want to run against GWB and to morph John McCain into GWB is disingenious.
This lifelong Democrat will be voting John McCain- my 1st vote ever for a Republican. This is not a time for a rookie President who needs to be tested

I am sorry for that sarah of lady,who is she retuning her dress to after the campaning? Would the dresses be up to the amounth she bougth the cloth for? All about republican goes,if were Democrate the will broke loss.

There will be many crises testing the next president of the U.S. Biden spoke of Obama because Obama will be the next President of the U.S. McCain is clueless if he thinks he would not have been tested. Now, as the Al Quaida favorite, McCain would be tested even more. It is very frightening to have a presidential candidate who exhibits such lack of foresight as well as poor judgment and impetuousness.

both parties are guilty of everything they throw at each other. THEY ARE ONE IN THE SAME !!!!!!! each side wants to grow the government, it may be for somewhat different reasons, but it doesn’t change the common denominator

If the bias-pro, Obama, media is going to quote candidates, let’s check out the others quotes, as well, for example:
QUOTE: “Biden, Obama is not ready for the job of President.”
QUOTE: “Hillary, Obama lacks the needed skills for the most demanding job on earth, the Presidency, and is woefully lacking in experience.”
And there are more that the bias media wants to forget…

Is love blind? There is no doubt, for all you Obama followers. You tend to ignore all the facts about the guy. From his blatant lack of experience to his radical leftist views and ties, you are totally blind or don’t care what happens to our country. Oh, sorry, I guess I left out those of you that are also of the radical left persuasion.
If Barack Hussein Obama gets in the White House, it will cost the taxpayers an absolute fortune, plus our freedom, to put the extra “S” in all those presidential seals. Just in case you don’t get it, the country will, for all practical purposes, be renamed the USSA. If you still don’t get it, the extra “S” stands for Socialist. In one fell swoop, our two party system would become irrelevant, and government would become the owner of our people instead of our people owners of the government.
The media says that we are all concerned about the economy, the war, illegal immigration and taxes. The answer to all the woes we have is reform, reform, reform. Vote out the corruption, hate mongers, and self serving politicians. Let McCain and Palin get the ones we can’t vote out.

You are right, reddog0216. It seems many Americans are just as clueless as the most ignorant Venezuelans, Bolivians and Ecuadorians who believed in CHANGE and YES WE CAN. Now they see that CHANGE means change toward Marxism and greater poverty and corruption. And YES WE CAN means Marxists like Obama, Odinga, Castro, Chávez, and other Marxists CAN fool people.

Holy cow! You can be sure of one thing: we are terrified of socialism. If its one thing we can’t understand it’s people working together toward abstract social goals. Just give us the simple corporate greed, we can understand motives like that. And all this talk of Obama being a closet muslim is really scary. They might try to take over part of the country like the Mormons did. Heck they practically still rule Utah! We feel we can speak for all of our cowardly conservative friends when we say it’s just best to vote the Republicans back in and then grab our ankles for four more years. We’re just too scared to do anything else!

John McCain – from Joe the Plumber – how to spend $150,000 wisely – hire a constitutional tutor for Sarah Palin.

To the McChickens of the world: Ignorance of the facts is no excuse for trying to blame the Bush administration for the problems with the economy. You need to look at Dodd, Franks, Obama and the other corrupt politians in the congress. Their radical views and organizations like Acorn are 1000 more responsable for the problem.

Planting Seeds of Disaster
ACORN, Barack Obama, and the Democratic party.
By Stanley Kurtz, Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Institute
‘You’ve got only a couple thousand bucks in the bank. Your job pays you dog-food wages. Your credit history has been bent, stapled, and mutilated. You declared bankruptcy in 1989. Don’t despair: You can still buy a house.” So began an April 1995 article in the Chicago Sun-Times that went on to direct prospective home-buyers fitting this profile to a group of far-left “community organizers” called ACORN, for assistance. In retrospect, of course, encouraging customers like this to buy homes seems little short of madness.
Militant ACORN
At the time, however, that 1995 Chicago newspaper article represented something of a triumph for Barack Obama. That same year, as a director at Chicago’s Woods Fund, Obama was successfully pushing for a major expansion of assistance to ACORN, and sending still more money ACORN’s way from his post as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Through both funding and personal-leadership training, Obama supported ACORN. And ACORN, far more than we’ve recognized up to now, had a major role in precipitating the subprime crisis.
I’ve already told the story of Obama’s close ties to ACORN leader Madeline Talbott, who personally led Chicago ACORN’s campaign to intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to low-credit customers. Using provisions of a 1977 law called the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), Chicago ACORN was able to delay and halt the efforts of banks to merge or expand until they had agreed to lower their credit standards — and to fill ACORN’s coffers to finance “counseling” operations like the one touted in that Sun-Times article. This much we’ve known. Yet these local, CRA-based pressure-campaigns fit into a broader, more disturbing, and still under-appreciated national picture. Far more than we’ve recognized, ACORN’s local, CRA-enabled pressure tactics served to entangle the financial system as a whole in the subprime mess. ACORN was no side-show. On the contrary, using CRA and ties to sympathetic congressional Democrats, ACORN succeeded in drawing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the very policies that led to the current disaster.
In one of the first book-length scholarly studies of ACORN, Organizing Urban America, Rutgers University political scientist Heidi Swarts describes this group, so dear to Barack Obama, as “oppositional outlaws.” Swarts, a strong supporter of ACORN, has no qualms about stating that its members think of themselves as “militants unafraid to confront the powers that be.” “This identity as a uniquely militant organization,” says Swarts, “is reinforced by contentious action.” ACORN protesters will break into private offices, show up at a banker’s home to intimidate his family, or pour protesters into bank lobbies to scare away customers, all in an effort to force a lowering of credit standards for poor and minority customers. According to Swarts, long-term ACORN organizers “tend to see the organization as a solitary vanguard of principled leftists…the only truly radical community organization.”
ACORN’s Inside Strategy
Yet ACORN’s entirely deserved reputation for militance is balanced by its less-well-known “inside strategy.” ACORN has long employed Washington-based lobbyists who understand very well how the legislative game is played. ACORN’s national lobbyists may encourage and benefit from the militant tactics of their base, but in the halls of congress they play the game with smooth sophistication. The untold story of ACORN’s central role in the financial meltdown is about the one-two punch to the banking system administered by this outside/inside strategy.
Critics of the notion that CRA had a major impact on the subprime crisis ask how a law passed in 1977 could have caused a crisis in 2008? The answer has a lot to do with ACORN — and the critical years of 1990-1995. While the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act did call on banks to increase lending in poor and minority neighborhoods, its exact requirements were vague, and therefore open to a good deal of regulatory interpretation. Banks merger or expansion plans were rarely held up under CRA until the late 1980s, when ACORN perfected its technique of filing CRA complaints in tandem with the sort of intimidation tactics perfected by that original “community organizer” (and Obama idol), Saul Alinsky.
At first, ACORN’s anti-bank actions were relatively few in number. However, under a provision of the 1989 savings and loan bailout pushed by liberal Democratic legislators, like Massachusetts Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy, lenders were required to compile public records of mortgage applicants by race, gender, and income. Although the statistics produced by these studies were presented in highly misleading ways, groups like ACORN were able to use them to embarrass banks into lowering credit standards. At the same time, a wave of banking mergers in the early 1990′s provided an opening for ACORN to use CRA to force lending changes. Any merger could be blocked under CRA, and once ACORN began systematically filing protests over minority lending, a formerly toothless set of regulations began to bite.
ACORN’s efforts to undermine credit standards in the late 1980s taught it a valuable lesson. However much pressure ACORN put on banks to lower credit standards, tough requirements in the “secondary market” run by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac served as a barrier to change. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy up mortgages en masse, bundle them, and sell them to investors on the world market. Back then, Fannie and Freddie refused to buy loans that failed to meet high credit standards. If, for example, a local bank buckled to ACORN pressure and agreed to offer poor or minority applicants a 5-percent down-payment rate, instead of the normal 10-20 percent, Fannie and Freddie would refuse to buy up those mortgages. That would leave all the risk of these shaky loans with the local bank. So again and again, local banks would tell ACORN that, because of standards imposed by Fannie and Freddie, they could lower their credit standards by only a little.
So the eighties taught ACORN that a high-pressure, Alinskyite outside strategy wouldn’t be enough. Their Washington lobbyists would have to bring inside pressure on the government to undercut credit standards at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Only then would local banks consider making loans available to customers with bad credit histories, low wages, virtually nothing in the bank, and even bankruptcies on record.
Democrats and ACORN
As early as 1987, ACORN began pressuring Fannie and Freddie to review their standards, with modest results. By 1989, ACORN had lured Fannie Mae into the first of many “pilot projects” designed to help local banks lower credit standards. But it was all small potatoes until the serious pressure began in early 1991. At that point, Democratic Senator Allan Dixon convened a Senate subcommittee hearing at which an ACORN representative gave key testimony. It’s probably not a coincidence that Dixon, like Obama, was an Illinois Democrat, since Chicago has long been a stronghold of ACORN influence.
Dixon gave credibility to ACORN’s accusations of loan bias, although these claims of racism were disputed by Missouri Republican, Christopher Bond. ACORN’s spokesman strenuously complained that his organization’s efforts to relax local credit standards were being blocked by requirements set by the secondary market. Dixon responded by pressing Fannie and Freddie to do more to relax those standards — and by promising to introduce legislation that would ensure it. At this early stage, Fannie and Freddie walked a fine line between promising to do more, while protesting any wholesale reduction of credit requirements.
By July of 1991, ACORN’s legislative campaign began to bear fruit. As the Chicago Tribune put it, “Housing activists have been pushing hard to improve housing for the poor by extracting greater financial support from the country’s two highly profitable secondary mortgage-market companies. Thanks to the help of sympathetic lawmakers, it appeared…that they may succeed.” The Tribune went on to explain that House Democrat Henry Gonzales had announced that Fannie and Freddie had agreed to commit $3.5 billion to low-income housing in 1992 and 1993, in addition to a just-announced $10 billion “affordable housing loan program” by Fannie Mae. The article emphasizes ACORN pressure and notes that Fannie and Freddie had been fighting against the plan as recently as a week before agreement was reached. Fannie and Freddie gave in only to stave off even more restrictive legislation floated by congressional Democrats.
A mere month later, ACORN Housing Corporation president, George Butts made news by complaining to a House Banking subcommittee that ACORN’s efforts to pressure banks using CRA were still being hamstrung by Fannie and Freddie. Butts also demanded still more data on the race, gender, and income of loan applicants. Many news reports over the ensuing months point to ACORN as the key source of pressure on congress for a further reduction of credit standards at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As a result of this pressure, ACORN was eventually permitted to redraft many of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s loan guideline.
Clinton and ACORN
ACORN’s progress through 1992 depended on its Democratic allies. Whatever ACORN managed to squeeze out of the George H. W. Bush administration came under congressional pressure. With the advent of the Clinton administration, however, ACORN’s fortunes took a positive turn. Clinton Housing Secretary Henry Cisnersos pledged to meet monthly with ACORN representatives. For ACORN, those meetings bore fruit.
Another factor working in ACORN’s favor was that its increasing success with local banks turned those banks into allies in the battle with Fannie and Freddie. Precisely because ACORN’s local pressure tactics were working, banks themselves now wanted Fannie and Freddie to loosen their standards still further, so as to buy up still more of the high-risk loans they’d made at ACORN’s insistence. So by the 1993, a grand alliance of ACORN, national Democrats, and local bankers looking for someone to lessen the risks imposed on them by CRA and ACORN were uniting to pressure Fannie and Freddie to loosen credit standards still further.
At this point, both ACORN and the Clinton administration were working together to impose large numerical targets or “set asides” (really a sort of poor and minority loan quota system) on Fannie and Freddie. ACORN called for at least half of Fannie and Freddie loans to go to low-income customers. At first the Clinton administration offered a set-aside of 30 percent. But eventually ACORN got what it wanted. In early 1994, the Clinton administration floated plans for committing $1 trillion in loans to low- and moderate-income home-buyers, which would amount to about half of Fannie Mae’s business by the end of the decade. Wall Street Analysts attributed Fannie Mae’s willingness to go along with the change to the need to protect itself against still more severe “congressional attack.” News reports also highlighted praise for the change from ACORN’s head lobbyist, Deepak Bhargava.
This sweeping debasement of credit standards was touted by Fannie Mae’s chairman, chief executive officer, and now prominent Obama adviser James A. Johnson. This is also the period when Fannie Mae ramped up its pilot programs and local partnerships with ACORN, all of which became precedents and models for the pattern of risky subprime mortgages at the root of today’s crisis. During these years, Obama’s Chicago ACORN ally, Madeline Talbott, was at the forefront of participation in those pilot programs, and her activities were consistently supported by Obama through both foundation funding and personal leadership training for her top organizers.
Finally, in June of 1995, President Clinton, Vice President Gore, and Secretary Cisneros announced the administration’s comprehensive new strategy for raising home-ownership in America to an all-time high. Representatives from ACORN were guests of honor at the ceremony. In his remarks, Clinton emphasized that: “Out homeownership strategy will not cost the taxpayers one extra cent. It will not require legislation.” Clinton meant that informal partnerships between Fannie and Freddie and groups like ACORN would make mortgages available to customers “who have historically been excluded from homeownership.”
Disaster
In the end of course, Clinton’s plan cost taxpayers an almost unimaginable amount of money. And it was just around the time of his 1995 announcement that the Chicago papers started encouraging bad-credit customers with “dog-food” wages, little money in the bank, and even histories of bankruptcy to apply for home loans with the help of ACORN. At both the local and national levels, then, ACORN served as the critical catalyst, levering pressure created by the Community Reinvestment Act and pull with Democratic politicians to force Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into a pattern of high-risk loans.
Up to now, conventional wisdom on the financial meltdown has relegated ACORN and the CRA to bit parts. The real problem, we’ve been told, lay with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, however, ACORN is at the base of the whole mess. ACORN used CRA and Democratic sympathizers to entangle Fannie and Freddie and the entire financial system in a disastrous disregard of the most basic financial standards. And Barack Obama cut his teeth as an organizer and politician backing up ACORN’s economic madness every step of the way.

Palin is a breath of fresh air. I’d like nothing more than to see her as a presidential candidate in the next election. How can anyone say that Obama is qualified to be president when even Palin is far more qualified. Yet, the left says she isn’t capable of being vice-president.

what is sarah palin thinking? shes trying to be the vice president when she just had a freakin child diagnosed with down syndrome? what is she gonna have it raised by a nanny and her boyfriend? along with her other 10 kids.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden have made the
case for John McCain in consecutive
weeks! Obama, in response to a question
from Joe the plumber revealed his true
intentions to “spread the wealth
around”. Translation: Obama will take
your hard earned dollars and give them
to the freeloaders on the street
corners!
Now Biden guarantees that an Obama
Presidency will be tested by an
international crisis within the
first 6 months of his administration!
Considering the 2 wars we are
currently in and the state of our
economy and Obama presidency is one
risk I’m unwilling to take!
In these troubled times will need
a steady, experienced, hand at the
wheel and that is John McCain!
Game Over. Case Closed!

Leslie and the previous comment sound like a couple of the leftwing haters that have issues with their mothers or girlfriends. Nothing constructive or deep thinking about their comments.

Dr. Wayne I pity you if Barack Obama and Joe Biden are the best you can do. If the media weren’t campaigning for them right now they would be no where. Even with all that money you poor people keep donating. Hmmm and you really think Obama cares about you? Look at all the money he has spent,plans on spending and still he is not that far ahead what does that tell you?

Biden also said in the same comment….which I guess is too much ink to spill…or spilling it ruins the high school giggle effect…that…
Those who test Obama will find he has steel in his spine.
But it’s not like Palin can read The Economist or anything.

Nastyasha,
Here’s the part you need to read about that poll, then read it again, again and again;
“The AP-GfK survey included interviews with a large sample of adults including 800 deemed likely to vote. Among all 1,101 adults interviewed, the survey showed Obama ahead 47 percent to 37 percent. He was up by five points among registered voters.”
PS – YOU LOSE!!!LOL!!!

Yeah,
That ‘crisis’ thing is silly.
Gee, remember what happened when the current pres was in office for 6 months? Well, nothing, LOL.
What happened 9 months later was another story, and that rests squarely on his shoulders. We as a nation have yet to resolve those matters for which an inexperienced president fumbled and we tumbled…
We fell down, America.
We have yet to stand up again!
I, as a proud American, want to stand tall again!
Obama will make us stand tall and proud.
McCain will act like we just need to keep limping forward as we have been for 8 long years.
I am tired of limping.
Stand Up America! OBAMA! AMEN!

Palin only spouts what she is programmed to say.
Isn’t it odd that she claims to represent Joe Sixpack, and Joe the Plumber, but the she has to dress with the champaign crowd?
It would take me several lifetimes to spend that much money on clothes!

I would trust Obama in any situation before I would trust McCain. McCain and Palin both go with gut instinct and believe they already know the answers. And what is McCain and Palin going to gather international support for the gut reaction decisions? They have divided America and they will divide the world by continuing Bush’s “you’re with us or against us” policies.

I’ll make this short and sweet. Their crying about ” 6 months” Palin & McCain. How out of touch they are when we have been going through it for eight long years. Then they talk about Palin being 6 years old when Biden got on the Senate. If we don’t watch it somebody is going to add another 6 from somewhere. McCain said if he wins he will freeze government spending , I wonder will that be the next 6…months or years. Well, you never know, our jobs are already gone out of the country, then the government jobs will be gone. Get ready here they come. Homes won’t only be lost, war won’t only be going on, more jobs won’t only be lost, but as you probably saw Obama on the food stamps we will probably be carrying food stamps, I don’t know. Our 401k’s are being taken. our home values are knocked down, and our banks are failing. WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON NOW! All they can come up with as an excuse not to vote for Obama (among other things) is to say that we will go through 6 months testing. Come on now! McCain said “boastfully”
I been through the test…yes lord…look at this “MESS”. Now put him in the White House, and you’ll know who was the best. “Palin” its not time for Joe 6 packs and hockey games, you’re running for Vice-President and this is no game! What we see happening now is really a shame. To see our fellow Americans go through so much pain. Then they try to make it a terrorist or a black and white thing, people are not fooled.. their tired of holding on to their little “change”.

The Obama camp keeps giving Americans a reason to not vote for them but people just don’t get it. People come on stop following this guy blindly!

The Obama camp keeps giving Americans a reason to not vote for them but people just don’t get it. People come on stop following this guy blindly!

Sharonklim sounds like one of those poor leftist ill informed NBC watchers that don’t have a clue of what’s really happening. She might wake up, if her ex son-in-law was a useless piece of garbage or the Dems attack machine was out to cannibalize her.
People aren’t stupid and approval rating is a oretty good indicator of Sarah’s honor or integrity.

Obama IS the crisis!! We have nothing to fear from russia – it’s just another 4th world banana republic.