Palin Charges Against Obama Seem to Move from Socialism to Communism
In Iowa today, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin charged that if Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., wins, he would usher in an era of “government as part of your family, taking care of us, making decisions for us.”
“That philosophy of government taking more, which is a misuse of the power to tax — it leads to government moving into the role of taking care of you and government and politicians, and kind of moving in as the other half of your family to make decisions for you,” Palin charged in Sioux City this morning, per ABC News’ Imtiyaz Delawala.
A member of the audience twice yelled “He’s a Socialist!”
But really, in many ways what Palin was describing sounded more Communist.
(She never came close to using the word, I should underline, though McCain and Palin have both used the word "Socialist" quite a bit to describe their opponents. But if you listen to how she describes the Obama-Biden plans, she seems very much to be describing that form of government.*)
“Now they do this in other countries where the people are not free,” Palin said. “Government as part of the family, taking care of us, making decisions for us. I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me.”
“See, under a big government agenda, what you thought was yours, your income, your property, your inventory, your investments, really would belong to somebody else, to everybody else,” Palin said. “And it would be shared with everybody else.”
– jpt
* Updated for clarity — to underline that Palin never used the word "Communist," though she compared an Obama-led U.S. to other countries "where the people are not free," the government would make decisions for citizens, your property and income would become the property of the state, etc. etc.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
She’s just getting nuttier and nuttier by the day, isn’t she?
Posted by: Lisa | October 25, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Dear Sarah,
Please shut up and stop throwing around these terms you don’t even understand. Communist states are usually in some ways similar to a fascist one- totalitarian. Big Brother is watching you and all. Kind of like what a certain REPUBLICAN president did with the PATRIOT Act, hmm? And the whole wiretapping and invasion of privacy thing? And, in a Communist and Socialist country, there is no privatization AT ALL. All the businesses, land, whatever, belongs to the state. The upper-class would have all their money seized, all their properties taken away to be divided up for everyone.
Now, giving people tax credits in comparison can hardly be called “Socialist”. I think it’d be good for the government to regulate the broken health care system, why not?
Sarah, you obviously don’t know what a socialist is, since by definition, your running-mate’s proposal to have the government bailout the bad mortgages is socialist. In comparison, Obama “the Socialist” never suggested such a thing and rejected McCain’s proposal at the debate. You are just doing this to link it to negative connotations of the Cold War and the whole link the Soviets have to socialism.
Posted by: Grey Matter | October 25, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
McCain did not want to be outshined intellectually; he couldn’t help but go and pick someone with the brain of a jellyfish for running mate…What a country-first true hero!
Posted by: Charity begins at home | October 25, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
I agree Lisa!! I just heard on CNN that “McCain team tensions go public”!!! Apparently she is looking out for herself and not McCain. Talk about being ungrateful!!
Posted by: akskimo | October 25, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
This woman causes trouble everywhere she goes. I bet she would just love rioting in the streets in her name. Send her back to her nutty church. Her 15 minutes of fame have gone on way too long.
Posted by: Loose Cannon | October 25, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Seriously? “government as part of your family, taking care of us, making decisions for us”. Two words–Terri Schiavo. Which party wants to make decisions for families?
Posted by: CJ | October 25, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
It might be an idea to move Palin to an asylum. Or to send her back to Alaska (since she’s dragging McCain’s ticket down) and replace her by… well, another fool.
Imagine Biden talking about fascism when discussing McCain’s policy proposals.
It’s sickening.
Posted by: herta | October 25, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Why Palin is a danger to America……
‘…This is the type of ignorant Christian Nationalism, where hillbilly gut instincts and religious edicts trump knowledge and reason, that corrupt Republicanism has devolved into.
This is what is meant to be “conservative” these days. It has nothing to do with the conservatism of years past, and everything to do with nativism , reflexive hatred of the other, suspicion and derision towards those who know something, and cronyism.
This woman embodies everything that is wrong with the current Republican party; there is a reason the know-nothings embrace her.’
Posted by: Blue | October 25, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
I can’t wait to watch her run in 2012 and see Giuliani and Romney rip her head off and feed it to her.
Posted by: Goon | October 25, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Only 9 more days left of this. I can’t wait.
Tomorrow Palin is going to be calling Obama “Hitler”.
Posted by: Alice | October 25, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Sarah Palin, Bill and Hillary clinton would not be campaigning with Obama if he were what you are accusing Obama of. You have no idea what you are talking about. So, you need to shut that lipstick mouth up. I do not like you or McCain and I will never ever vote for you.
Posted by: mary | October 25, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Alice,
From the way it seems to be going, I think in 9 days she’ll be calling him Mr President.
Posted by: Grey Matter | October 25, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Another attempt to scare Americans. Give it a rest already.
Posted by: ziadora | October 25, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
The GOP is the party that wants the state to decide on all matters of life and death. THAT is the core of both communist and fascist states.
It is the Democrats that defend individual rights in these matters. That is as anti-communist and anti-fascist as it gets. It’s American, part of our Constitution.
Posted by: kalder | October 25, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
McCarthy/Palin 08
Posted by: Corey | October 25, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Tomorrow Palin is going to throw a “Bachman” and say that Obama has “anti-American” views and doesn’t believe in “pro-America”.
Posted by: Joseph | October 25, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
I can’t wait until 2012 when Palin reappear with the rest of the GOP guys! They are going to use all this against her – especially the scripted lines and all the lies and flip flopping it’s going to be real nasty. She’s definitely All confidence with no brains she actually believes that she is ready to be on the national scene she doesn’t realize they actually used her as a prop… The GOP guys and girls will turn on her after this is over!
Just go ahead and call him “Hilter” for crying out loud… this woman is dangerous!
Posted by: Sharon | October 25, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Palin/McCain at a political event horizon.
So sad.
Posted by: Charity begins at home | October 25, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Palin and the whole McCain camp are like the old Iraqi information minister…
Palin’s unhinged!!!
Posted by: MIKE NC | October 25, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
After Obama has won the election, the Palins will join the Alaska Independence Party again.
If it’s lucrative, that is. She needs clothes, remember? Lots of clothes.
Posted by: ufo | October 25, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Not completely on the subject but when the wealth starts to be redistributed in our country will Obama include all of his very wealth Hollywood types, trash talking comedians on TV who are supporting him, pro sport players,owners of major newspapers, televisions, cable companies or he just going to go after Wall Street, Oil Companies and middle America?
Posted by: William | October 25, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Well, McCain started his campaign by saying Obama was a pedophile, then a socialist, now a communist.
What’s left really? Nazi? Poor McCain, he’s run such a horrible campaign and it’s gotten him nowhere! Only these uneducated gop dead-enders seem to believe this garbage.
Posted by: bubba | October 25, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Bill,
I didn’t know we had a world government to begin with.
McCain’s campaign is pretty un-American for calling the Northern part of Virginia “Communist Country” and saying that the southern portion of Virginia was “Real Virginia”, just because it’s leaning Democratic- in a nation where freedom of speech and diversity opinion is celebrated. Or for questioning people’s patriotism (e.g liberals hate hard-working, real Americans).
I suppose we should get the police to arrest the 175,000 “fake” Americans that showed up at Obama’s Missouri rally.
“Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”-Samuel Johnson.
Posted by: Grey Matter | October 25, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
I thought McCarthyism was a national disgrace, and a national trauma. It destroyed the creers and lives of many totally American Americans. It was as close to Stalinism as the USA has ever been. The paranoia of power.
But what does Palin know. Or care.
She is a disgrace. The GOP will slaughter her after McCain’s loss.
Posted by: hank | October 25, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Captain Acorn,
She eluded to “those other countries” and we all know what she was implying
Are you that ignorant that you believe that the tax rates we had under Ronald Reagan are “socialist”? The same ones Obama has proposed?
Don’t be a Captain lemming.
Posted by: Abusrd and Ignorant, the "reformed" GOP | October 25, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
I have to laugh at the fools who display there ignorance on this thread. They regurgitate the same nonsense post after post as if they are going to influence anyone towards their positions.
Gov. Palin will become president either after Sen. McCain or on her own. Deal with it!
Posted by: Captain America | October 25, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
How sad to boil it down to scare tactics…again, skirting the real issues on what they (McCain/Palin ticket) plans to do for the American people….they are focusing on what will happen when (yes, I said when) Obama wins!
The Repubican ticket should have stayed with the issues on moving the country forward vs. nonsensical and hypothetcial scenarios…. They must be smokin’ something illegal!
Obama/Biden 2008!
Posted by: Richard | October 25, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Kate Buckingham, Well said! I could not have said it better myself..How can people even consider voting for (Vietnam/Iraq McCain) that’s all he talks about..I am not voting for the president of Vietnam or Iraq..I am voting for the president of the United States of America. When the Republicans back are against the wall..they pull out code words like socialism,communism,liberal etc…They are pathetic. McCain stated about three months ago that he does not know much about the economy..is that the type of president I want in the white house? Palin is an attack dog..she never says what a McCain government is going to do to reverse the current economic situation but she uses the campaign to attack Obama’s character etc. “Pitbull in a dress”. You are right Kate..I have done some travelling and its amazing how the world supports Obama and is hoping for an Obama win..and on the other hand how the world looks on in amazement how people are even considering voting for the member of a Party(Republican) who single handedly destroyed the US economy. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 25, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Palin is awesome, smart and very hot.
So for you ladies our there trashing her you are just envy of her. Period.
And the guys trashing her are just left winger losers.
Sarah is here to stay for long and you better get use to it.
LOL
Posted by: Sarah the hottest | October 25, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
For what it is worth Barak Obama has a more liberal voting record than the one elected Socialist in Congress (that being Bernie Saunders of Vermont). There are no Communists in Congress, but if there was one I would assume Sen. Obama would be to the right of him/her. By how much. I can’t say.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 25, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
“Gov. Palin will become president either after Sen. McCain or on her own.”
LOL
She makes a pretty lousy start then with her negative favorability ratings on Election Day.
The majority of Americans doesn’t like and/or trust her.
Posted by: hilde | October 25, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Sarah Palin doesn’t let up!! What will it be tomorrow??? Any person with average knowledge of government would go – here she goes again. Her claims are so absurd!! Claims don’t even make any sense!! Who is doing her speech writing??
Jake you are quite correct she is referring to communism. I research her well and found she is what I would classify as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” Only this wolf’s attacks are laughable!!
The stock market was down another 300+. America is in financial meltdown crisis. Sarah Palin doesn’t even get that right. I find she lies right and left. But then she was found to have abused her power as Governor of Alaska this month.
Posted by: Sharonklim | October 25, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Everytime Palin opens her mouth she spews dirt. That is because the dirt throwing takes the place of any real ideas. Comments like those in the article are the reason that the GOP will loose this election. McCain, in essence, lost because he didn’t pick someone capable of being a world leader. WINK! WINK!
Posted by: Olivia | October 25, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
This is the same woman that think she will be in charge of the nation as a VP. She’ll be history in a few more days.
But what has happened to John McCain?
The man has sold his integrity and every bit of self esteem to try and win this election. It’s so sad and pathetic.
Guess he figures this is his last shot.
Posted by: GOP Candidate McCain killed Sen McCain | October 25, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
This election is not going to end well for Sarah or John and we are all the better for it.
Posted by: doug | October 25, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Ick. I think I need a shower after reading those comments.
Bless their hearts, the Republican Party has become entirely unhinged. They are long past just offering bad policies, which only leaves the dangerous, demonizing rhetoric.
Posted by: Jeff C. | October 25, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Some lunatics in this thread don’t seem to know that liberalism is the opposite of communism.
Please so back to school or do some private study, using the Internet.
Posted by: prince | October 25, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
To say this woman is crazy is an understatement, and don’t forget, dumb, every time she speaks, it just gets worse for McCain, I just feel bad for her kids, they have been brain washed to think the way she does….
Posted by: Paul P. | October 25, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
When does she start calling Obama a commie pinko?
Sarah Palin: The gift that keeps on giving to the Obama campaign.
Posted by: Alex | October 25, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Jake Tapper,
You are putting words in her mouth.
Palin never said communism.
I am so sick of the media smearing her.
She didn’t say anything about communism.
If she breathes you media types jump on her.
Enough already.
Posted by: Jason | October 25, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Sarah Palin is awesome!
Sarah Palin is smart!
Sarah Palin is powerful, so powerful that people can’t stop talking about her. They can’t ignore her, they can’t get enough of her.
She will be a leader in the Republican party.
Sarah is here to stay.
Posted by: Go Sarah | October 25, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Sarah makes us laugh. She mouths whatever is written and put in front of her. Don’t think she understands what she is reading and the difference between socialism and communism.
Anyone takes what she says seriously ought to have his/her head examine or go back to school to learn the critical thinking skills that are so under developed, yet vital for a successful democratic society.
Posted by: educator | October 25, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
She’s very good at playing to the ignorance of the “base”. But as they say, she’s just like them.
Posted by: It's like an infomercial gone bad | October 25, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Concerned in Ohio, I do not think you are that stupid..listen to her words..the implication is that Obama is a communists.. But that is what you Republicans do when your backs are against the wall..you use code words to scare people..Republicans are pathetic! Go away for a while so that our country can be respected in the world again and our economy can make a turn for the better. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 25, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Sarah the hottest,
I’m sorry, I have to say I’m embarrassed a fellow woman has so little intelligence and appears frighteningly naive on foreign policy or the economy. She doesn’t seem to know what socialism means. McCain suggested the govt should bailt out bad mortgages? Isn’t that socialist? And her supremely naive assertion that, “In my world, there are the good guys and bad guys.” with regards to the Arab Israeli conflict. You can’t solve things by labelling people “bad” or “good”. These so-called “bad guys” are a party in the conflict, and you need everyone’s cooperation.
Posted by: Grey Matter | October 25, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Sen. Obama (D-ACORN) has voted with Senate Leader Reid 97% of the time!
Now, we realize that the democrat controlled Congress has a 9% approval rating, right?
Posted by: Captain America | October 25, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
She sounds like she is a few cards short of a deck…what on earth is she thinking?? If she really wants a run in 2012, she best start sounding les radical in her rhetoric.
Posted by: Dee | October 25, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Jake, could you please counter such utter BS charges with the facts? That’s necessary, I’m afraid: most of Palin’s fans are so naive they actually believe her.
The McCain-Palin ticket does not oppose a progressive tax system. In fact, back in 2000, McCain said that rich people paid more in taxes because they could afford to do so:
“I think the first people who deserve a tax cut are working Americans with children that need to educate their children,” he said, “and they’re the ones that I would support tax cuts for first.”
More importantly, Obama’s tax plans are less progressive than those during the Clinton years.
In fact, the rates that people making over $250,000 would have to pay would be the same as during the 1990s – a time definitely not marked by the absence of freedoms.
Posted by: trooper | October 25, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Jason, go to school or read a book on the tenets or philosophy of communism..she may not have used the word Communist but the implication of what she said to describe Obama’s plan is that he is a communist or his plan has communist tenets. You Republicans don’t get it..you cannot destroy your country’s economy..spend 10 billion dollars each month to keep our troops in Iraq..and expect us to vote your your despicable, incapable,uneducated Republican so called leader in there again for another four years..do you expect that? Well keep on dreaming and drinking that koolaid. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 25, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Someone forgot to give this woman her medication again it seems. She is really doing a number on McCain’s campaign.
Like everyone else who posted here, I can’t wait for Nov 4 and then Palin’s 15 minutes are over and she can go hide in the igloo she crawlwd out of.
Since at one point i liked Mccain, a friendly bit of advice- Mccain, there is still time, drop her and select someone else. With the way things are right now, Mccain has nothing to lose since he is in freefall anyway.
Posted by: Tom | October 25, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Palin has lost her mind.
Posted by: Gus | October 25, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I’m so tired of the media bias.
There is no democracy left in america.
You have 85 percent of the media doing whatever they can to elect Obama.
This is the most biased covered election in our lifetime.
This is unhealthy for demoracy.
You wind up with 300 dem house seats, 60 dem senate seats, most libreal president, liberal media, liberal courts.
So you think Obama, Pelosi, Reid with filibuster proof majority is good for democracy.
We need McCain to veto Reid and Pelosi’s spending not Obama to go along.
We need balance in government and checks and balances not giving Obama all the power.
Obama is a joke he had never even been to western europe before July.
Obama has no record so he goes around pretending he is running against Bush.
This election is a disgrace.
Hillary got more votes and was cheated out of the nomination.
What a disgrace this process is.
Posted by: Jason | October 25, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
What the heck is Sarah Palin doing wasting time in Iowa? They’re getting beat by double digits there.
Posted by: Billy | October 25, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Captain America:
You and Jason are drinking from the same glass of spiked koolaid..keep on drinking! If you think we are going to put a man who owns 9 houses and 13 cars as president of these United States you are drinking and dreaming at the same time. Such a wealthy(his wife)or rich(him)man cannot understand the situation that currently affects the middle class Americans. I always tell people that there are two classes of people who support the Republican party 1. People who are rich(because their taxes are low) and 2. People who pretend to be rich. The interesting thing is that the Republicans who heretofore pretended to be rich are now flocking to support Obama because they are really feeling the pinch of the stupid Republican theory of trickle down economics..there is not even a trickle now! Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 25, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Lets see what we have this year: A ticket of an inexperieced presidential candidate and an experienced vice presidential candidate (the Democrats) versus a ticket of an experienced presidential candidate and an inexperieced vice presidential candidate (the Republicans). At worst this is what they call in sports parlance, “a push” (meaning even). I, however would give the edge to the Republiacns because Palin will have time to learn on the job should she have to succeed McCain at some point. (Lets all hope for good long healthy lives to whoever becomes President, by the way.) Meanwhile, Obama has to be ready on day one. And, frankly, I don’t think he is.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 25, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Palin is a fruitcake and this just another example of it! Losing and trying anything, next Obama will be called a vampire. What a bunch of dolts! Come on Palin, I heard Obama is a vampire, who wants our blood! Moron!
Posted by: richard | October 25, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
What, she hasn’t called him an atheist yet? Maybe she waiting till after she claims he’s a wife beater, child molester or cannibal.
Posted by: JR | October 25, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
A former President of the Harvard Law Review, professor and expert on the American Constitution, a communist?
LOL!
Why not a buddhist? A cyclist? A dentist?
Wish these 10 days would be OVER. The crap and trash coming out of this mom in diva clothing is killing me.
Posted by: greta | October 25, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Sarah “the Diva” Palin is now all about 2012. She knows that McCain is going to lose so she is setting her sights for her own bid for the presidency in 4 years.
She could care less about McCain any more.
Posted by: Joseph | October 25, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Sarah Palin is treading dangerously close to Ashley Todd’s mental health, or lack thereof. Do you think she too will be attacked by a meticulous, dyslexic “big black man?”
Posted by: DVS | October 26, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I’ve learned early on about liberals. The ones they fear are the ones they lash out at.
Gov. Palin is someone liberals fear, much like they did Ronald Reagan. And, she too will become a great president.
Deal with it!
Posted by: Captain America | October 26, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
“Chavez, Castro and Putin support Obama.”
LOL
And you think Putin is a communist?
LOL
Do you KNOW anything about the world?
Just wondering.
Posted by: LOL | October 26, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
I believe that Sarah Palin is working for the Obama campaign..another brilliant move by the Obama campaign..they trick McCain into picking her knowing that she will be of immense help to them..the Obama campaign is brilliant..Obama is quite capable of selecting a brilliant team to run this country. Watch how the McCain campaign is falling all over the place..now I read that there is infighting between the McCain team and the Palin team. “London bridge is falling down” should be the McCain campaign from now until November 4. Heaven help us all and please save us from those Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Stanley,
Average americans have Rezko to get them a mansion like Obama had.
Average americans have credit card executives to get them a mansion like Biden did for half price.
Average americans give Rezko 14 million in earmarks like Obama did for favors buying a mansion.
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
…in other news
Crazy Joe had to field some tough questions with a reporter in Orlando and he freaked out, canceled any further interviews with her.
Question: If Crazy Joe is afraid to mix it up with a TV reporter, how can be possible help the neophyte Obama (D-ACORN) handle the impending international crisis in the first six months of his administration?
Thank you, you are right, he like Obama (D-ACORN) are unfit for office.
Posted by: Captain America | October 26, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
“Gov. Palin is someone liberals fear, much like they did Ronald Reagan. And, she too will become a great president.”
Reagan would despise Palin.
Peggy Noonan attacked and rejected Palin several times now in the WSJ. Noonan was Reagan’s greatest speech writer, and a true conservative.
Noonan despises Palin’s superficial populism and lack of knowledge and philosophy. So do many conservatives from the Reagan area.
Posted by: Conservatives Against Palin | October 26, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
She was hoping that Florida nutcase interview would have given her ammo, but alas! Oh, btw, a few days ago, when we were talking about Palin’s $150k wardrobe and I was talking about the NYT layout on A15/A22 which on the same page had a N-M ad on the same side of the paper….I didn’t think there was a Neiman’s in the NY metro area, which made the ad very odd to be in NYT at all. Turns out there is an outlet store on Long Island now.
Now, why is someone whom the NYT just destroyed for having more zooey Wasilla Assembly of God connections to other witch hunters even being taken seriously?
Oh. We’re having fun with her, since all she is now is a joke.
Posted by: kravitz | October 26, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Enough is enough. I’ve been defending McCain non-stop against the Obama nonsense, but c’mon, communism, that is way overreaching. The only communists I’ve seen in the last few years are the right wing that wants to impose its heartless mindset on what people do in the bedroom. The health insurance proposal is far from anything that remotely resembles communism. If anything, Wall Street speculative greed has brought us to the brink of collapse and the only way out now is more regulation. The days of greed are almost over. Obama has now become inevitable because McCain’s lousy campaign can’t get its message straight, so basically I’m telling you to get used to it suckas.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 26, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
topo2005 – Can I ask you why you use the word “liberal” like it’s a dirty word? Webster says that liberal means being someone willing to change and favoring reform. It means broad minded and not bigoted. Conservative means favoring the status quo and being critical of change. I also think it means “righteous” in the sense that one persons ideas and beliefs should trump someone else’s rights. That concept is what nazism is all about. The GOP has been taken over by people who want the Constitution ammended anytime something offends their value system. The righteous right is more scary in my eyes than any liberal.
Posted by: olivia | October 26, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
She was hoping that Florida nutcase interview would have given her ammo, but alas! Oh, btw, a few days ago, when we were talking about Palin’s $150k wardrobe and I was talking about the NYT layout on A15/A22 which on the same page had a N-M ad on the same side of the paper….I didn’t think there was a Neiman’s in the NY metro area, which made the ad very odd to be in NYT at all. Turns out there is an outlet store on Long Island now.
Now, why is someone whom the NYT just destroyed for having more zooey Wasilla Assembly of God connections to other witch hunters even being taken seriously?
Oh. We’re having fun with her, since all she is now is a joke.
Posted by: kravitz | October 26, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Keep talkin’ Sarah. Every word you utter in another vote for Obama. I’m from Iowa originally. I’m related to hundreds of Iowans and not one of them is anything like you. I mean nothing like you. “Your property would not be your property, it would really belong to somebody else?” Would you like to link that to anything anyone has said, except LaRouche? Is she completely out of her mind? Iowans are sane and reasonable and informed – Republicans and Democrats alike (well, except the nutso King guy). They have one of the higest literacy and graduation rates in the country – and these people are way, way too smart for you. You sound like you just spent the past 20 years in an emcampment with the AIP. When do the black helicopters come?
Keep talkin’ Sarah. Do some more interviews too.
Posted by: Mara | October 26, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Stanley, you are a Republican..this Stanley is a proud Democrat..glad to meet you but you need to put down the koolaid..This Stanley supports the winning team(Obama/Biden). All my entries are pro Obama because like the millions of voters who will vote for Obama on November 4, I am a thinker and I don’t watch the garbage on Fox(Hannity,Oreilly etc. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Conservative against Palin (sure you are):
RR would rave about Gov. Palin. She, like he, believes in American exceptionalism.
She, like he, believes that government is not the solution, government is the problem.
Peggy Noonan was a Reagan scribe who has lived off that currency for over two decades. She never held public office, she never ran for public office, and she surely never garnered 80 percent approval as governor.
Posted by: Captain America | October 26, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
If Palin knew anything about history or economics, she wouldn’t be making these ridiculous allegations.
Posted by: Virginian Marine | October 26, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Jake Taper concluded his article with following (including a postcript he added later):
“See, under a big government agenda, what you thought was yours, your income, your property, your inventory, your investments, really would belong to somebody else, to everybody else,” Palin said. “And it would be shared with everybody else.”
– jpt
* Updated for clarity — to underline that Palin never used the word “Communist,” though she compared an Obama-led U.S. to other countries “where the people are not free,” the government would make decisions for citizens, your property and income would become the property of the state, etc. etc.”
With all due respect to Mr. Tapper, let me correct the him, his post clarification not withstnding: Gov. Palin never said your property would become property of the state. What she said is that it would belong to everyone else. What she should have said, and perhaps what she meant to say, is a larger portion of it (meaning taxes) would belong to everyone else. And that much is true.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 26, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Sheesh, you whine about $150K in wardrobes that you are not contributing to, what idiots!
I am a contributor to McCain-Palin and I am pleased to see how the funds are allocated (unlike you grumbling liberals) who have no standing in the matter.
Now, in fairness:
1. How much was Obama’s (D-ACORN) temple of Zeus constructed for his coronation?
2. How much was that trip he made in Oct-Nov 2007 to get his murderous “cousin” Raila Odina elected in Kenya. Which may have cost him the primary win in New Hampshire?
3. How much was the “citizen of the world” trip?
Such selection indignation by those who have no skin in the game (i.e., never contributed to McCain-Palin). Don’t you realize how foolish you appear?
Posted by: Captain America | October 26, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
McCain/Palin are like college kids trying to cook spaghetti. Throw it up against the wall to see what sticks. No thanks. No sale. No vote for you, Sarah!
Posted by: Rose | October 26, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
JPT,
You’re making it up while showing your obvious bias.
What ever happened to journalistic integrity? Perhaps you’re the wrong person to ask about that.
Posted by: Captain America | October 26, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
You have got to be joking Palin oh…my dawg.
The conservative right has been in charge and telling us how to live our lives for 10-12 yrs now!!!!
If you want a religious leader move to Iran that is what they have. or move to the Vatican, they have the pope.
I don’t want a pope to run this country, I want a President.
Posted by: mike | October 26, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Stanley, you are making up stories(Rezko/Bden) like a typical Republican..you guys never cease to amaze me on your story telling. Obama nor Biden does not own 13 cars and 9 houses..I know that for a fact..Hey Stanley(Republican) can you explain to me why at the Republican convention/s you only see white people, mostly old and sad looking..and also at the McCain/Palin campaign stops you only see white people with sad,scary faces? and at the Democratic convention you see a multicultural/cosmopolitan crowd and at Obama/Biden campaign you a multicultural crowd which is more representative of America? Can you break it down for me and explain why? Me think you shall not! Your Republican party is losing ground..just this week two prominent Republicans voiced that they will be voting for Obama. 1.Powell 2. Scott McClellan(Bush’s former press secretary). Thank you guys! you do not stand alone because many Republicans are seeing the light and coming over. Heaven help us all and save us from those Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
He is and they are. Anyone paying attention knows what redistribution of wealth means….
Posted by: Scott | October 26, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Stanley, the Rev Wright issue is dead..Obama put the final nail into that coffin and America is not buying it anymore..what else do you guys have in your pocket before November 4..Marxist? Communist? What! What! Republicans are pathetic. The same thing the George W. team did to McCain in South Carolina in 2004 is the same thing that he is trying to do to Obama..he even hired some of George Bush’s 2004 attack dogs..Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Billy, I wondered the same thing. McCain is at 39% in Iowa. Is there really still a McCain campaign? Or does Sarah Palin just go out in thousand dollar outfits – and sound like La Rouche? Does she think that Iowans are all in militias? I can guarantee you they aren’t. She is so off mark it’s unbelievable.
And these attacks against Tapper are completely unwarrented. He didn’t make up Sarah’s lines (Your property won’t belong to you, it will belong to somebody else, everybody else) he simply reported on them – and he is completely right. Then he qualifed his statements several times. It doesn’t sound to me like liberals are the ones who are scared.
Posted by: Mara | October 26, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Scott,
He is too old! and they are going to lose in November!(Republicans). Enough said! Obama will invest in the middle class and get rid of the Republican party voodoo economics based on the trickle down theory. Heaven help us all and save us from the Republicans!
Posted by: Stanley | October 26, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
The government making decisions for you…like telling a woman what she can and can’t do with her body, Sarah? Let’s see, you get free designer clothes, have contractors build your home for free, paid a per diem to work at home, taxpayers pays for your family to travel and stay in first class accomodations. Guess you do know a thing or two about communism.
Posted by: pamp205 | October 26, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
If Bush moved the tax bracket upwards, and Obama moves it back down to where it was when REAGAN was president….how is that any different from what every other GOOD president has done?
Last time I checked most Republicans loved Reagan, so you would think they would LOVE to have someone honor what Reagan did and put our taxes back along the same lines.
GEE, use your brain.
Posted by: mike | October 26, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I would bet my 401k and my SUV she can’t name 2 communists and 2 socialists (outside of the president and the fed chair and the secretary of the treasury and the congress and the house, and AIG, Fannie, Freddie, …)
Oh, never mind.
Goodnight.
Posted by: what? | October 26, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Grey Matter,
You had me at “shut up”.
But thanks for a thoughtful explanation.
Posted by: nuanceparser | October 26, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
The closer this election gets the worst the republican party act. Remember God don’t like ugly so when you wake up one morning and your eyesight is gone, or you cant walk, or you kids start getting sick remember you reaped it now sow it.
Posted by: Kelly from SP | October 26, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
I think when the whole story comes out about all the freebies she has extorted or received from her oil company friends in Alaska she will have done in 4 years what it took Ted Stevens almost 40 to accomplish. By the way, where are the medical records?
Posted by: bhciapol | October 26, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
In reply to: Posted by: kravitz | Oct 26, 2008 12:10:01 AM
Kravitz wrote:
“topo2005 – Can I ask you why you use the word “liberal” like it’s a dirty word? Webster says that liberal means being someone willing to change and favoring reform. It means broad minded and not bigoted. Conservative means favoring the status quo and being critical of change. I also think it means “righteous” in the sense that one persons ideas and beliefs should trump someone else’s rights. That concept is what nazism is all about. The GOP has been taken over by people who want the Constitution ammended anytime something offends their value system. The righteous right is more scary in my eyes than any liberal.”
Where did I say liberal was a dirty word, or even implied it. I actually defended Obama as not being Communist if you really read my comment. (Perhaps you just skimmed it, which we all do time to time.) I did say he has a more liberal voting record than the one elected Socialist ib Congess, which is a fact.
By the way, please try to refraim from chiding Palin for calling Obama a communist(which she never did) while you compare Republican ideas to Nazism. It comes off as the extreme name calling you are complaining about.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 26, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
This is a bit rich coming from a governor who asked for the most earmarks of any governor in the country, by a huge margin, then used then sent cheques to everyone in Alaska. What an opportunistic hypocrite!
Posted by: S Mc | October 26, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
What’s the difference between Jake Tapper interpreting Palin’s remarks as implying communism and McCain interpreting Obama’s TAX CUT FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS as Socialism?
You mean Jake’s wrong and McCain’s right?
OBAMA = PRESIDENT
McCAIN = FAIL
Posted by: Ed from MA | October 26, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
She was hoping that Florida nutcase interview would have given her ammo, but alas! Oh, btw, a few days ago, when we were talking about Palin’s $150k wardrobe and I was talking about the NYT layout on A15/A22 which on the same page had a N-M ad on the same side of the paper….I didn’t think there was a Neiman’s in the NY metro area, which made the ad very odd to be in NYT at all. Turns out there is an outlet store on Long Island now.
Now, why is someone whom the NYT just destroyed for having more zooey Wasilla Assembly of God connections to other witch hunters even being taken seriously?
Oh. We’re having fun with her, since all she is now is a joke.
Posted by: kravitz | October 26, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
has sarah palin called obama the devil yet? if not expect it.
mccain has only himself to blame for what has gone wrong with his campaign
not the media, not obama, not the clintons,
only mccain and his bad judgement.
he should have taken the high road and preserved his honor.
Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz | October 26, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Obama isn’t even populist, much less socialist. Obama is MILES to the right of John Edwards, and Edwards was nowhere close to socialist. Obama’s trade policies are to the right of Reagan’s, Ford’s, Nixon’s, and Eisenhower’s. Obama is the most Conservative Democratic nominee in American history.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | October 26, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Fact: Obama is not a communist.
Fact: Republicans are not facists.
Now for opinion (mine): The worship of Obama by a (hopefully small) portion his supporters is a little bit disconcerting, and at times just plain creepy.
I can see McCain has some warts. After all the guy has been in Congess over 20 years so he is sure to have commited a few clunkers. The question, for me, is about Obama. He started running for President after being in the Senate one half a year. And now he is, we are told, on the precipice of achieving that goal. But what do we really know about him? Obama gives me very iffy feeling.
Posted by: topo2005 | October 26, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
If Obama Hussein is elected the stock market and economy will take another major dive. Even though I lost $ I will move the remaining amout out before trading. The market fell 4,000 pts since the bailout and will fall another 5,000 if the socialist is elected. The free market in the US does not like gov’t control (markets in South America can attest to) and will virtually dry up. Something similar to the great depression will occur. Possibly markets in emrging eastern European countries which favor democracy will survive or certain Asian markets.
Posted by: jamesferrel | October 26, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
If Obama wins, America is a sick nation … A nation whose people cannot see TROUBLE until it flies right into the living rooms and then they sit wondering WHAT hit them.
Obama is where he is because he is eloquent. And where did Obama get that eloquence – partly, by sitting at the feet of the Rev. Wright for 20 years.
The Rev. Wright, though appalling in what he says, is quite “entertaining” – If I were Black and feel “oppressed”, I would thank God everyday for him just the way Conservatives thank God everyday for Rush Limbaugh.
Why would we now even worry about Osama destroying us from the outside. We have OBAMA who will do just that from the INSIDE.
Obama has an agenda that will destroy if not lay the seed for the downfall of a great nation …. OBAMA, REID AND PELOSI will do tremendous damage in 4 years … but good Americans are sleep walking … They honestly cannot see it.
I have Biden’s idea – Why dont we just divide the United States into 2 countries … one for the OBAMAMANIACS under OBAMA, REID AND PELOSI.
The rest of us can secede to a 2nd nation who believes in spreading opportunities, rewarding honest hard work and teaching responsibility …
Because I believe there is no compromise between these 2 agendas.
Maybe, we can just give each person one vote … the vote to secede to a 2nd nation or to stay with the Obama’s socialist agenda ..
Let’s break America into 2 countries just the way Biden wanted to divide Iraq into 3 nations.
Let the people who want to be governed by Obama go to him. The rest of us will secede. And let us see how many will actually choose to go with Obama?
I will vote to go with those who believe in responsibility and accountability …
I dont need handouts … I only need opportunities and the chance to dream and to make those dreams come true. I do not want to live my life waiting on someone else to do the hard work and then wait on government to take the money from them and give to me.
NO THANKS
Posted by: Divide US into 2 countries | October 26, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Geo Bush has been training troops for civil unrest within the US under a expanded congressional legislation. This occured after Katrina. The thought now is if the economy regresses into a depression encouraged by a socialist gov’t forced by an Obama presidency which will lead to unrest. Although a coup has not even been thought of in the US it may be a reality if certain economic and political events come to a fruition. – The military does not support Obama.
Posted by: jamesferrel | October 26, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Don’t forget to face east when you recite your prayers 5 times a day, Barry Soetoroites!
Posted by: charles | October 26, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Jim Nuzzo, a White House aide to the first President Bush:
“Win or lose, there is a ready made conservative candidate waiting in the wings. Sarah Palin is not the new Iain Duncan Smith, she is the new Ronald Reagan.” If the country survives a failed Obama term this will be true. Clinton had a dismal first year in office and unfortunately if Obama is elected he will have a dismal four years. His policies just don’t make sense for an economy is such a state as it is now. Clinton was at least a Centrist. The economy improved but his policies including the repeal of Glass Stiegal lead to the start of the subprime mess.
Posted by: jamesferrel | October 26, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
“A member of the audience twice yelled ‘He’s a Socialist!’
“But really, in many ways what Palin was describing sounded more Communist.”
Maybe in some situations there’s a difference between them, but in many others, there isn’t. If you look at Socialist Viewpoint, in which Sen. Obama’s official blogger, Sam Graham-Felsen, has been published, this is how they describe their mission: “After being expelled from Socialist Action in 1999, we formed Socialist Workers Organization in an attempt to carry on the project of building a nucleus of a revolutionary party true to the historic teachings and program of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Trotsky… We continue to have an optimistic outlook about the revolutionary potential of the world working class to rule society in its own name—socialism.”
And while far from Obama’s only tie to Marxism/communism/socialism, this one is just very blatant: he had the openly pro-communist band, the Decemberists (their name is a reference to a lower-class uprising), open and close for him in Portland this past May. They perform the anthem of the Soviet Union in Russian. He posed for pictures with them. But if any reporter should ever dare to bring this up – practically an impossibility, despite all those who’ve died under communism and from fighting it – I’m sure there’d be plenty of outrage over someone being so rude and disrespectful.
Posted by: Erika | October 26, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Sorry, are we still listening to what Palin says – and reporting on it? Why?
Is anyone else ready for this election to be over? Enough is enough. Although I am still waiting for my last big McCain campaign stunt…
Posted by: Florida Republican | October 26, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
erika
re:’he had the openly pro-communist band, the Decemberists (their name is a reference to a lower-class uprising), open and close for him in Portland this past May. ‘
atta girl, gosh darn it….keep them Konspiracy’s comin’… now it’s music…… can’t wait to see what’s up next for you losers to rant about…
so the McCain campaigns use of those 2 christian singers at their convention means that Republicans want to establish christianity as the official religion of the US… right?
I am enjoying the decline and fall of the republican party..
Posted by: Blue | October 26, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
I cannot believe the crazy diatribes about Socialism and Communism, just because Obama wants to to end the tax breaks put in place by that economic wizard, George W Bush. For heavens sakes, it takes a lot of nerve to rant on about how Obama will ruin democracy and kill our economy after everything that has happened in the last eight years. I don’t even recognize the country I grew up in, that my dad fought in World War ll to defend and protect. The right wingers have made this into a dark, scary and divided nation. I hope it is not too late to undo the damage.
Posted by: Phoenix Lady | October 26, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
McCain should go to Bush and have him fire Paulson(damn insider for these banks)and put in his guy to use the money by holding the bank, mortgage insurer and borrower each 25% responsible for the equity loss and the government Take a 25% bite. Then hire an outfit to rent(til sold) and sell the distressed properties for a 30% premium. Also hold foreclosed owner liable for any damage.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
I’ve read all the comments, and as a “high knowledge” person that researches everything I can, I can honestly say: Some of you republicans (republican Stanley, Captain America,Jason, etc.) that are regurgitating the Fox talking points like they are the truth really make me sad for what that channel has done to this country. They should be required to have a disclaimer that everything they say is “opinion” and not very well informed opinion either, and not real news.
You know why the other news sources don’t say what Fox does? Because it is not true!! You people are the kind of people who think the National Enquirer always tells the truth … Fox lies, do you understand?
Posted by: Lucy | October 26, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
phoenix lady, its not the tax breaks. Its the income redistribution. Taking from those that have to give to those that do not have. Instead of income, maybe he should introduce a federal asset tax. Anybody have assets exceeding 1 million pay 5%, 10 million pay 10% and 100 Million and over 20%. See what the Warren Buffets feel about that.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Now, how abiout detesting Communist climes with such ferocity and dexterity shown by this celeb VP and yet taking (borrowing) China’s money to finance a misguided war in Iraq as well as its forlorn offsprings, aka, “the surge”, “bring our soldiers home in victory”. So much for the defence of the American freedom while taking Americans to debt peonage, all in the name of “defending American freedom”.
Posted by: OLADINI OYEBADEJO | October 26, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
Alaska’s biggest paper, The Anchorage Daily News, has endorsed Barack Obama for president..
’nuff said
Posted by: Blue | October 26, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
Lucy, instead of characterizing. Why don’t you prove them as lies.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
Blue, newspapers are hoping they be will be subsidized by Obama. Most of them with there high flying rates are going under. Enough said.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
Grey Matter, Sarah Palin is no McCain. She is about freedom, freedom and more freedom. Something u seem to hate.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am
OLADINI OYEBADEJO, So what? The Democrats and RINOS have controlled our social and education for nearly 80 years. Why is our education and social system worse now?
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am
John e. —- Sarah Palin is hardly for freedom. She is a strong believer in her church, which is Charismatic Pentacostal. They (and she) believe in a Theocracy … that means a Church run government. Her church. They also believe in demons inhabiting zip codes and states and individual people. I couldn’t make this up.
Posted by: Lucy | October 26, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Lucy……Thanks for the offer. But if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck. It is a duck. I know of no lies stated by Palin. No lies stated by Fox. McCain has lied. I do not care for him. As for Obama, a total buffoon, lier, radical and socialist(anti-American;known as oppression)
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am
If obama wants a fair tax system. Whys does he not come out with an asset tax?
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
I will vote for Obama if he comes out with an asset tax instead of an income tax increase.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
I am no Republican, own no gun and have not attended church for years. I will stand behind a candidate who believes in freedom foremost. Which one will that be? So all u keep drinking the kool-aid as Obama will break Jim Jones record.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am
Some of you bring up health care. Socialized health care does not work. At least now can get it even if you are poor. Under socialized system you will be put on a wait list. Most important a socialized health care system will stifle Bio-technology and Medical-technology advancement.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
Erika……..u believe in his policy. Then you are a socialist. Nothing wrong with that.
Posted by: john e | October 26, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Some of you bring up health care. Socialized health care does not work. At least now can get it even if you are poor. Under socialized system you will be put on a wait list. Most important a socialized health care system will stifle Bio-technology and Medical-technology advancement.
_________________________________________
Ask Palin if she enjoys her free Alaskan health care.
If you are a native born Alaskan or married to one, you are entitled to free health care.
Guess it works huh???
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: Bev | October 26, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am
John, if you think that McCain and Palin are the best choice for you, then vote for them. Obviously anything in the way of real information doesn’t get in the way of your decision LOL!
I think Sarah Palin is the worst possible choice McCain could have picked as VP. Not only is she an extremist right Christian who believes in Theocracy, she has shown definite dishonest (if not illegal) behavior in her dealings as a Mayor and Gov of Alaska, she is the member of an extremist anti-womens rights group (Concerned Women for America)and has a total diregard of the sanctity of animals life (Cruelty to animals)(shooting wolf pups from a helicopter and passing a law that if people bring back the right paw of a wolf they get $1000)Not to mention her refusal to believe a subspecies of Polar bear is becoming extinct and that global climate changes are man made.
From the abstinence only, anti-science, anti-evolution, man started 4,000 years ago, censorship promoting, anti-Pro choice platform she stands for,
everything I have found out about her from independant nonpartisan sources is so against everything I am. I find her hugely distasteful in everyway, to the expensive tramp clothes she wears now (knee high leather boots, give me a break!)to the flirting and winking on stage. What kind of VP behavior is this? How disgusted would you be if Obama (or McCain .. yew I just threw up in my mouth at that thought) behaved that way??? It’s politics, not a beauty pagent or American Idol. I half expect her to hold a finger up to remind us to vote for no. 1. YUCK YUCK YUCK … she singlehandidly put women back 20 years.
Why didn’t McCain pick Gov.Carol Sebelius for VP?
I really really really don’t like anything about Sarah Palin. From her ambition putting her unwed pregnant daughter in the limelight, making Levi have a shot gun wedding even though his MySpace said he never wanted kids or to get married, her son having to go in the military because of multiple drug charges, her involvement with The Alaska Independence Party whose Founder Joe Vogler accepted money from the government of Iran so he could go to the UN and promote his party.
Every single thing about Sarah Palin I find distasteful.
Posted by: Lucy | October 26, 2008, 6:20 am 6:20 am
“…government as part of the family, taking care of us, making decisions for us.”
Holy cow, Govenor. Given your opposition to government making decisions for us, I guess you’ve reconsidered your opposition to choice.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 26, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Brooklyn Democrat,
We are not against choice. We support liberty and freedom and choice as Republicans. You take ONE ISSUE out of it’s greater context and declare we are against choice as conservatives. No, we are not against choice. However, you have to admit that when one person’s choice harms and wounds another person – one person’s will is imposing injury on another person… and that’s not right.
You cannot defend a principle that says, “I want my choice even if someone else is harmed.” That’s wrong. The law must protect the injured party – the victim – against the aggressor… or we could have no laws defending people from violent crimes, assault, rape, and murder.
Stop and think about it. No one wants to restrict your free choices as a conservative. Just don’t cross the line to hurt someone else… or we will rise up to defend the innocent victims of aggression.
Don’t you want us to protect people from being harmed, wounded, injured, or even killed??
Now, do you want to try to tell me that a baby is not a human being??
If that baby inside your womb that you murdered wasn’t a baby, what was it??
Posted by: laura | October 26, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Oh, I forgot one thing Laura … clearly you don’t know what Theocracy means. It means a Church run government.Like Iran, which is an Islam run country and the Ayatollah of the country is the one who holds the power, not Akmadinajiad.
I don’t want Sarah Palin to become POTUS and try to change our country into a Theocracy, but she would try. It is a very strong belief in her church. Just because you don’t believe it, doesn’t make it not true, because it is.
Posted by: Lucy | October 26, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
“…government as part of the family, taking care of us, making decisions for us.”
Hmm. Sounds a lot like Palin’s Alaska: yearly “dividend” checks to all of its citizens (including babies!), appointing a boatload of high school buddies (“family”) to positions they were unqualified for, shutting down competitive bidding on the non-existent gas pipeline (her advisers were lobbyists for TransCanada or its subsidies)…yep, I quite agree; Alaska is, in essence, a Communist state!
P.S. Especially love the fact that this year, welfare checks to constituents were $3,269.00 for every man, woman, and child. This, for doing absolutely nothing…no “hard work” required. In fact, no “work,” period! Well all I can say is: Those lazy welfare “queens” in Alaska better stop makin’ so many babies just to get bigger checks…shameless, I tell ya…
Posted by: Barbyrah | October 26, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
A REPUBLICAN HALLOWEEN TRADITION
THE OCTOBER SURPRISE
Race innuendos, terrorist stew
More Reverend Wright evil brew
No money left, do the sums
But something wicked this way comes
Palin opens her crooked mouth
To fan the hatred in the south
‘Kill him’ blurts from drunken gums
When something wicked this way comes
October surprise will tell the tale
Will Evil win or will it fail?
Karl Rove schemes with his vile chums
And something wicked this way comes
McCain has shown that there is nothing that he will not do,
nothing he will not say to get elected.
A man of Honor?
Corporations First, Country Last.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
We have allowed the government to incrimentally take over our lives and apparently some americans are so incapable that they think government needs to do everything for them. The federal government was not supposed to oversee every part of our life. They should be providing infrastructure and national security. That is it.
This entire financial mess was created by the government micromaning housing. It is an unintended (hopefully) consequence of congress mandating to Fannie and Freddie that they reduce requirements for underwritting mortgages. Legistators created this mess and now they are creating a bigger mess by getting further involved in the process.
This is the opportunity Ayers and other 60′s radicals have been waiting for all this time. It will not be long now before we will no longer be able to save for our children’s future. We will have to give all of our money for other children’s future while their parents collect our tax dollars for complaining that they are not getting enough.
Posted by: ubu1991 | October 26, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
In America, only Freedom is sacred.
There is only one religion in the United States of America and it’s Bible is the Constitution, it’s Ten Commandments are the Bill of Rights, and it’s Lord’s Prayer is the Declaration of Independence.
Sarah Palin is a demagogue who would destroy our religion for her own power.
She needs to go back to Juneau, or get a talk show.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
They should ask Palin what both of those words mean, see if she can even answer the question.
Posted by: Jwench | October 26, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
MCCAIN’S OWN WORDS IN 2000 – HE’S A SOFT SOCIALIST FLIP-FLOPPER
STUDENT: Why is it that someone like my father who goes to school for 13 years gets penalized in a huge tax bracket because he’s a doctor. Why is that – why does he have to pay higher taxes than everybody else? Just because he makes more money. How is that fair?
MCCAIN: I think you’re questioning, questioning the fundamentals of a progressive tax system where people who make more money pay more in taxes than a flat across the board percentage. I think it’s to some degree because we feel obviously that wealthy people can afford more. We have over the years beginning with John F. Kennedy reduced some of those marginal tax rates to make them less onerous. I believe that when you really look at the tax code the very wealthy because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes really don’t pay as much as you think they do, when you just look at the percentages. And I think middle income Americans, working Americans, who when you count in payroll taxes, sales taxes, mortgage — all of the, all of the taxes that working Americans pay — I think you would also think that they also deserve very significant relief.
At that point host Chris Matthews asked for members of the audience to applaud if they support wealthier people paying a higher percentage of their incomes; there was loud applause.
STUDENT: I still don’t see how that’s fair…aren’t we getting closer and closer to Socialism and stuff…?
MCCAIN: Look, here’s what I really believe: That when you are, when you reach a certain level of comfort, there’s nothing wrong with paying somewhat more. But at the same time it shouldn’t be totally out of proportion.
McCain added that the “first people who deserve a tax cut are working Americans…and they’re the ones I would support tax cuts for first.”
WHO IS THE REAL JOHN MCCAIN?
FLIP – “we feel obviously that wealthy people can afford more (taxes)”
FLOP- “spreading the wealth is just socialism”
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Laura is just trying to maintain enthusiasm for Obama. She is throwing out outlandish accusations just like McSame/Pain do that has caused them to lose so many points in the election polls. Thank you Laura. Your ramblings and accustaions have probably made a few others see that the Republicans platform is “don’t vote for me, vote against Obama.”
Posted by: SUSIE | October 26, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
I don’t think you have the right to tell me I can’t have an abortion then if I so choose. And this is consistent with Rowe vs Wade.
lUCY, First I think something should be said. Just because a person is republican or democrat does not mean they blindly follow everything their “Party” believes. I am a republican and I believe in choice also. You say your point of life is when brain waves start. I believe it is when life is sustainable outside the womb. One thing I do believe in is telling your children that no matter what you are there for them and together you can face anything including unwanted pregnancies. I think it should be a requirement for an abortion that some sort of counseling be needed just to be sure that this is indeed the decision they want to make.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
I believe that when you really look at the tax code the very wealthy because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes really don’t pay as much as you think they do, when you just look at the percentages. And I think middle income Americans, working Americans, who when you count in payroll taxes, sales taxes, mortgage — all of the, all of the taxes that working Americans pay — I think you would also think that they also deserve very significant relief.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
I believe that when you really look at the tax code the very wealthy because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes really don’t pay as much as you think they do, when you just look at the percentages. And I think middle income Americans, working Americans, who when you count in payroll taxes, sales taxes, mortgage — all of the, all of the taxes that working Americans pay — I think you would also think that they also deserve very significant relief.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
FLIP-FLOPPER
careful you are using the republican strategy from the last election.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Aveteran:
“a requirement for an abortion that some sort of counseling…”
What business is it of yours? Run your family the way you want and stay the he!! out of mine. Why do Neo-Repubs wants government out of everyone’s lives except they still want to tell women what to do? Hypocritcal. Sexist. Unamercian, in my view, to have the government saying one word about reproduction or marriage.
Communist China tells families they can have only 1 child. Communist Repubs tell women thay should have child after child because THEY believe some religous ideal. You tell me what the difference is beyond control of individuals and impostion of one group’s beliefs over another group.
Posted by: JSF | October 26, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Do you believe Abraham Lincoln was a great president?
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
A Veteran:
According to Sen. McCain’s website, in 2006 he and his wife donated $129,390 from community assets to charity (19.0% of his adjusted gross income). In 2007, he and Mrs. McCain donated $210,933 from community assets to charity (27.2% of his adjusted gross income).
Sen. McCain donates all of his royalites from his books to charitable organizations. Since 1998 that cumulative total is $1,800,000. In addition, since 1991 Sen. McCain has donated the increase in his Senate salary for each year to charity. That cumulative total is over $450,000.
Posted by: James Danley | October 26, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
JSF
I am not a neo repub. As I said I am for choice. I just wonder how many have regretted their choice after. All I am saying is that one visit to a counselor so that every aspect is covered and brought to the table. Some may never think there is a viable alternative. I agree with stay out of my family and let me run it how I would like. Yet you are for government interference when it benefits you if you are for Obama.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
James Danley
Thanks for the info. It does help with trying to determine overall character.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
For those who believe Abraham Lincoln was a great president here is the following.
Historians and politicians made Abraham Lincoln a great president. If he truly was a great president is rarely discussed. Today, much of the voting population seems to have disgust for George W. Bush’s disregard for the rights of individuals and his own Constitutional restraints. Yet Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, spent money without Congressional authorization, imprisoned 18,000 suspected Confederate sympathizers without any trial and conducted at least 4,271 trials by military commission. Note the remarkable similarities: George W. Bush defined captured enemies as “enemy combatants”, denied these “enemy combatants” Habeas Corpus and tried these “enemy combatants” through military tribunals. Will historians and future politicians make George W. Bush a great President?
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Michigan State, October 12, 2000
“I believe that when you really look at the tax code the very wealthy because they can afford tax lawyers and all kinds of loopholes really don’t pay as much as you think they do, when you just look at the percentages. And I think middle income Americans, working Americans, who when you count in payroll taxes, sales taxes, mortgage — all of the, all of the taxes that working Americans pay — I think you would also think that they also deserve very significant relief.”
Go ahead and read it, John McCain’s own words. Change you can trust?
Corporations first, Country Last.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
seemstome
I think overall everyone has the same feeling please tax everyone else but me. The very rich seldom use any of the services their money provides for.
I woould rather see a fair flat tax. No loopholes. Whatever percentage it is everyone pays. The rich would still pay more. We talk about fairness but do not want to practice it if we are affected somehow. Again go to the website and read it. Even with their lawyers and loopholes they still account for 85%. Are you saying it should be 100%
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
It is what it is. That is what Obama subscribes to – no matter what single word you use to describe it. It is what it is. Why can’t people see that?
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I think if when we paid our taxes and we knew the money was spent wisely and with restraint all people would be willing to pay their share. We pay and watch our debt continue to grow with every president which causes frustration. Some things need changing. I know welfare is different in almost every state. Here in NY we have second and third generation welfare families. They believe it is a way of life. I think there should be limitations on how long you can collect. They say there are no jobs. Everyday I check the paper and open to the help wanted. There are still plenty of job listings there. Medicaid is a burden to the working taxpayer. When I see people on medicaid getting better care than the working man with insurance, then have have no co-pay and have cell phones, big screen tv etc I think that is wrong. Is Obama going to change any of that? Will McCain?? Probably neither. As I said before, when you get right down to it they only need us little people to get to the white house. After that we are forgotten for the next 4 years.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Lisa: I’ll tell you something even nuttier. What is described is exactly what Obama wants to do and what you think is okay. But if it’s described as and called ‘communism’ by the media, you call her nutty. How else would you describe Obama’s plan of spreading the wealth around by raising then taking the “rich”s tax money and distributing it as he (the govt) sees fit? What do you call that Lisa?
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Socialism per Wikipedia:
Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how, and to what extent this could be achieved.
Does this sound familiar?
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
John McCain has repeatedly said go check my record. He is willing to have you scrutinize it. Sure you will find mistakes in judgement. He is human as we all are. I have never heard Obama say check my record. Obama wants you to just believe what he says, not what he has done. I urge everyone to check both records and then decide your vote.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
You got it exactly right, A Veteran. And to be honest with you, I’ve gotten to the point where I almost feel the election is rigged to begin with. Too many things, and the timing thereof, are too coincidental. So what are the little people really here for? Worker bees and people told to get into debt and that debt is good and the American way… so the big hoo-haws can make lots of money.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
For those who have said and want to believe McCain failed as a POW and his fellow prisoners turned on him. You have no idea what you are talking about. I was in the serveice and had to go through Survival school called SERE training. Part of that was a two day stint in a mock POW camp. What it basically taught everyone was that you don’t ewver want to be caught by the enemy. Everyone will break under severe torture. EVERYONE. Fellow servicemen do not turn on their brothers for breaking under torture. They do turn on them for giving information without torture. They try to stay alive as a means of defiance. Had he taken the early release ahead of others offered then he would have been thought of differently. He chose not to and was tortured more for it. He did not allow himself to be a means of propaganda. I for one applaud his behavior there and his and the others will to keep living despite the torture it brought them.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
msa123
About the debt I couldn’t agree more. I watched two programs that really brought it to life. I recommend watching Frontline: The secret history of the Credit Card
The other is : In Debt We Trust
Everyone should watch and understand the cards are stacked against you.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
How dare someone judge a man until they’ve walked in his shoes. It’s fair to disagree with policies and character based on events that you can relate to. Very unfair to judge a POW based on what you have no clue about. Those who do would probably be the first ones to break and cry.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
In America, only Freedom is sacred.
There is only one religion in the United States of America and it’s Bible is the Constitution, it’s Ten Commandments are the Bill of Rights, and it’s Lord’s Prayer is the Declaration of Independence.
Sarah Palin is a demagogue who would destroy our religion for her own power.
She needs to go back to Juneau, or get a talk show.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
A Veteran: I wish you were running for President because I would vote for you. You tell it straight, keep it simple and fair. That’s what we need.
:-)
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
seemstome
You seem to imply that Obama is honoring the constitution. One of the Constitutional requirements has to due the being a natural born citizen in order to become president. Why then is it taking a lawsuit for him to simply prodeuce his birth certificate and honor that requirement.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
In regards to the bc, he still hasn’t produced it, even with the lawsuit. Both he and the DNC have tried to have the case dismissed. I find that odd. Everyone says “oh it’s on the internet”. Right. Some people actually mistake the internet for providing all facts and authentic documents. The lawsuit is real, and it is being fought, instead of simply providing a bc and being over and done with it.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
msa123
Thank you but I probably wouldn’t want the job if it means having to have my family attacked by journalism. I have always believed in the KISS method. Keep It Simple Stupid. Work smarter not harder. I just believe that we desperately need to change how government is run. Successful companies change when they see the need, why can’t the government. We need to send people to washington who really truly are for the people. That is in every spot in government, not just the elected officials. People who know how to live within their means. People who know fiscal soundness is vitally improtant. We complain about big oil and their profits which yes are excessive. I have looked into wind and solar power for our home and guess what? It seems cost prohibitive. $25,000 – 45,000 to implement it. I can pay for 20 – 40 years of the current prices for that amount of money. I want a green planet too. How about those in power for a green planet do something about those costs so we can afford to implement it. We need to cut down on foreign aid. I don’t know too many fiscally sound minded people that borrow money to give to someone else. We the people, you know the little guys need more than ever, and I mean both sides, we need to stay on top of whoever is elected to insure that we the people are the first and foremost on their minds.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
msa123
To give you a little background. I am pushing really hard at 60 years old. I am a veteran of Vietnam. I am disabled now but not from Vietnam. Between us our household income is just shy of 50,000, that is with a registered nurse. Our home is paid for, we have no credit card debt. We have a 2007 van and a 10 year old pickup. We do manage to go on vacations once or twice a year though not extravagant ones. No Tahiti or Europe etc. We live comfortable and are able to put some money aside. When we want something we put money aside for it then buy it. We may have to wait a couple of months or so before we buy but usually the price is lower then. Our area taxes seem high but I bet everyone feels that. We try to enjoy life as much as possible and try to help others whenever we can. All in all it hasn’t been necessairly an easy road to this point but that is the same for most. Think I would still qualify??
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel and it must be getting awfully crowded in that refuge for McCain, what with the whole republican party using it too.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
A Veteran
Yes, you qualify and would receive quite a bit of support.
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 26, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Dave in lv
Thanks again. Unfortunately we never get to see someone like ourselves, the good little people out here running for office. I remember many years ago a readers digest article about 4 fresmen congressmen newly elected and how they were going to Washington to change government. We never heard from them again and ther was never another article about them. The black hole know as washington swallowed them up.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
seemstone: You’re a pro! You should be on McCain’s team you’re so good at pointing fingers at the other side’s evils instead of even knowing who or what you’re voting for and defending it?! Do you really honestly think that Obama is going to change anything for the middle class? If he does, it will be the first time in the history of the world that the middle class gets what is due them. It’s all about money, and the middle class is only needed to keep the wheels turning… they don’t care ‘whats fair for the middle class’… or anyone else! Hell, they’ll just take it from these guys who have more and give it to the middle class so they’ll shut up and keep working for them. Is that really so hard to see?
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
John McCain has been acting erratically ever since he selected Palin for his running mate. When the economy failed his behavior became bizarre. Stresses on any president in the next few years are going to be extreme . They will be fatal for someone in McCain’s health and mental state. When he steps down we will then inherit his Palin fiasco.
Now Colin Powell has recognized these facts and has endorsed Obama as being a cool-headed and logical leader who is more fit for the presidency.
Kipling said it best:
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you
But make allowance for their doubting too,
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream–and not make dreams your master,
If you can think–and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much:
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!
He was talking about men like Obama.
Posted by: seemstome | October 26, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Palin has just made the worst accusation ever!! Communism!! This is so bogus!! This is fear mongering!! No to McCin-Palin!! No honor or integrity for these two. But then these are the two candidate who were found guilty “abuse of power” while serving our country. Honesty is definitely not present.
Sarah Palin you should be ashamed of yourself!!
Posted by: Sharonklim | October 26, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Sharonklim
Be fair now. Palin never said the word communism. The article author made that connection.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
seemstome
Couldn’t some of that fit with Bush also?
I like someone who is ashamed at showing a little emotion at times.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
A Veteran: I cannot imagine our govt if it were filled with people like you. That is why I get so irritated at the general population thinking that one man is going to get in there and make life grand for those “that deserve it”. I feel insulted that they’ve (don’t know “they” are except that they are the ones that control the money and ‘universe’) hurled a man at us (Obama) to try and make us feel all warm and fuzzy inside because if that was not the case, we’d probably all rise up and go hang the CEOs of those lending companies!! They distract us and give us someone we can find ‘hope’ in and so we ‘settle down’. I believe that is how they keep the general population under their thumb… give them a Reagan or Obama type personality… Anyhow, like you or someone else here said, if a truly decent and good man gets in there, anywhere in govt, they get sucked up and never get anything done. There is arm twisting, legislation that talks about funding for pig farmers for someone’s state on the same legislation that talks about bailing out a corporation. It all sounds very dismal because it is. I guess it’s okay to dream that it’s different but unfortunately, after 45 years I cannot believe my dreams anymore.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
This is one of my concerns.
To pull our troops out prematurely would be a disaster. If we did Al_Quaeda would flow into that country like the waters from the flood of Noah. They would take Iraq over, Bin Laden would probably set himself there also. What then? Go back in?? Leave Afghanistan to go back to Iraq? The Iraq govenment is making progress and still needs time to solidify itself. Does anyone else think this or am I just totally wrong.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
I agree with you, A Veteran, and as usual, Obama has waffled on this issue as well. He waits until something is obvious and then is either for or against it based on the outcome. He has no principles. Or they are ‘after the fact’ principles. Just like his 20 yr delayed severing of ties with his minister. The list goes on and on.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
msa123
Never stop dreaming. We need to continue if not for us then our children and grandchildren. It is possible but it take the little people like us to make it happen. We need to make demands of those who represent us, tell them how we want them to vote. Tell them if they want our vote for the next election they will follow our wishes. Meanwhile we need to start teaching our children that greed and lust for power is the wrong path in life. No greater satisfaction comes than by helping your fellow man. If you play the stock market which I don’t start questioning more the salaries of the ceo’s. If they want to take jobs away overseas everyone should sell their shares of that stock. I guess what I am trying to say is we the little people need to stay with the political process more even after the election is done. Hold them to their promises made.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Dear A Veteran,
I would like to thank you for your service to country. It is an honor to know that there were men and women who answered the call during those times. As for your comments, I am very glad you have not stooped to the low road like many here for done so. I do urge all to inspect the candidates RECORDS and not their RHETORIC to see who will lead more effectively. Yes, in this case, the PAST will dictate the FUTURE. Thanks again, sir.
Posted by: fraggenboots | October 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
We need term limits for congress also as we do for the President. That way new congressmen and women can’t be pulled aside and told to toe the party line if you want a future here.
Actually I am for some form of no party government. That way there would be no Partisian politics. Most good politicians already believe that both sides have good ideas. I don’t have a clue really on how it could be implemented, I wish I did.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
A Veteran,
I would agree with the caveat the Iraqi government works out an acceptable agreement. If not, then they are choosing to do it on their own.
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 26, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
All, you think that BO refuses to release college transcripts because he took certain classes? No! Why did Saul Alinsky’s son claim that BO was a student of his? Saul Alinsky and Ayers are both Communist (actually, Ayers said in 2001 in an article, that he was communist with a little “c” to mark the difference).
Posted by: fraggenboots | October 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
fraggenboots
You are entirely welcome and Thank you also. It is nice to hear from people who understand history. The past does dictate the future, always has. There was a quote from Abe Lincoln: “There are no accidents in my philosophy. Every effect must have its cause. The past is the cause of the present, and the present will be the cause of the future. All these are links in the endless chain stretching from the finite to the infinite
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
A Veteran: “We need term limits for congress also as we do for the President. That way new congressmen and women can’t be pulled aside and told to toe the party line if you want a future here.
Actually I am for some form of no party government. That way there would be no Partisian politics. Most good politicians already believe that both sides have good ideas.”
I strongly agree with the term limits for congress. You may lose a few good ones but also you can get rid of the idiots and get new ideas and thoughts in there. You hit the nail on the head with that one. The president is just a figurehead and messenger to the people, that does what everyone else wants him to do. Oh, he may make a change or two that he wants… along the lines of social issues. but in the long run, it’s the same old thing.
Just imagine if we had a government full of people such as yourself. Now THAT I could dream of. But to dream that a president is going to make the changes they promise, given our current government, and it’s structure, and the career politicians in there? No way!
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
This has been one of more pleasant sessions here for quite awhile. The right to vote for the candidate of your choice is the cornerstone of our government. I only ask that you make the decision wisely as all of our futures are at stake. I need to go for now but will be back later. Thanks to all for your ideas and comments done with better taste than some I have heard other days.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 26, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
fraggenboots: I nearly forgot about Saul Alinsky… there are so many ties to keep up with.
On one hand, I don’t believe the president really has as much power as we’d like to believe that he does… but with ties like this… I really don’t care to take the chance to find out otherwise.
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Obama claims he hardly ever met Rezko, or just a few times at most.
The FBI has Obama meeting with him weekly.
Who do you believe?
Obama claims Ayers was just some guy in the neighborhood.
Yet his wife was friends with Ayers’ wife for 17 years. Ayers foundation gave Obama a job as chairman of the boeard. Obama directed millions of dollars to groups founded by Ayers. Obama’s coming out party was in Ayers’ living room.
Who do you believe?
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 26, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Dave: And the real problem is two fold. Why would he have these types of relationships with these types of people and think nothing of it? And secondly, why would he lie about them afterwards? It is a very tangled web he has woven… and he is very good with words and “technically accurate” statements… after all, he was a lawyer (no offense to lawyers but we all know that they are the best at what they get paid to do, which is to find legal loopholes and convince the other side that they or their client is innocent).
Posted by: msa123 | October 26, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Dave writes, “Who do you believe?”
===========================
I will tell you who I don’t believe..You. (lol) What you just wrote is nothing short of a lie. The information available to day pretty much allows anyone who is worth his/her salt to discern between fact and fiction. You my friend, pure fiction.
Posted by: Dems | October 26, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
dave in iv
re: ‘Who do you believe?’
Looks like the country doesn’t believe you or the republicans……and it get worse for you every day……….a complete and total rejection of the neo-conservative/republican dogma of the last 30 years…….. good riddance …… it will be interesting to see how much damage Bush & Co. can do in the remainder of the year to leave a complete ‘scorched earth’ policy for Obama.
Posted by: Blue | October 26, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Everytime this woman speaks she confirms what an idiot she is.
Posted by: indy_voter | October 26, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
OK, there is a lot of speculation about Obama’s relationship with Antoin (Tony) Rezko.
This is it.
Barack Obama and Tony Rezko
Antoin (Tony) Rezko is an American political fundraiser, restauranteur and real estate developer in Chicago, Illinois, convicted on several counts of fraud and bribery in 2008. Rezko has been involved in fundraising for local Illinois Democratic and Republican politicians since the 1980s.
I should say at this point that Tony Rezko did contribute to Obama’s Illinois Senate campaign. Rezko contributed to many politicians campaigns. He was a major mover and shaker in Chicago politics and was heavily involved in the fundraisers of them, Democrats and Republicans alike. In Chicago it was hard to find someone that Tony Rezko didn’t have some kind of dealings with. The question is, did Obama do anything illegal or even close to illegal?
After Barack Obama was elected to the Harvard Law review, Tony Rezko’s company, Rezmar Corp. offered him a job, which Obama turned down.
What real dealings did Barack Obama have with a Rezko?
Barack Obama wanted to buy a certain house, but the realtor said it was a package deal with the property behind it. He knew Tony Rezko, and even knew Rezko was under investigation by the F.B.I., but Obama brought up to Rezko about the house and property, at a mutual acquaintance’s party. Tony Rezko’s wife, Rita Rezko, said she would buy the property, while Obama bought the house, therefor agreeing to the realtor’s and the owner’s terms.
A year later, Obama additionally bought a strip of that property from Rita Rezko to increase his backyard’s size.
In all of Tony Rezko’s (and Rita Rezko’s) dealings investigated by the F.B.I., there was never any illegal dealings with Barack Obama. However, Barack Obama has said it was a “bone-headed decision he made”, seen as Rezko was being investigated by the F.B.I. at the time and he “should have known better”.
I agree, I think he should have known better too. What a dumb butt. Bet he won’t do that again.
No one is perfect. But it is a nice house.
Posted by: TruthBTold | October 27, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am
indy_voter
Socialism per Wikipedia:
Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how, and to what extent this could be achieved.
Does this sound familiar?
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 27, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am
Ayers describes himself as a communist with a little “c”.
Other than actually bombing US sites, what else does Obama disagree with Ayers?
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 27, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am
There should be a rule in politics that before you accuse someone of something, you need to actually know what that thing is
Calling Obama, or even just his economic plan, “socialist” is inane.
On the other hand, what apparently *is* a rule in the McCain campaign is that you can accuse your opponent of something only if you’ve done or said the same thing yourself, but to an even greater extent.
Case in point: here’s what John McCain himself has said:
“Look, here’s what I really believe: That when you are, when you reach a certain level of comfort, there’s nothing wrong with paying somewhat more.”
Posted by: MLA | October 27, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm