By Jennifer Parker

Oct 31, 2008 11:25am

Palin Fears Media Threaten Her First Amendment Rights

ABC News’ Steven Portnoy reports: In a conservative radio interview that aired in Washington, D.C. Friday morning, Republican vice presidential nominee Gov. Sarah Palin said she fears her First Amendment rights may be threatened by "attacks" from reporters who suggest she is engaging in a negative campaign against Barack Obama.

Palin told WMAL-AM that her criticism of Obama’s associations, like those with 1960s radical Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, should not be considered negative attacks.  Rather, for reporters or columnists to suggest that it is going negative may constitute an attack that threatens a candidate’s free speech rights under the Constitution, Palin said.

"If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations," Palin told host Chris Plante, "then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."

However she feels about the way her story has been told in the press, Palin told WMAL she is not discouraged.

"It’s sort of perplexing to me, because I’m a practical person and plainspoken also, but just cutting to the chase and calling things like I see them, just like most Americans.  But this has not left a bitter taste in my mouth, the bitter shots taken by the mainstream media and by some of the elitism there in Washington," Palin said.

"What this has left me with is a very energized and positive feeling about America, because there are enough Americans who are desiring the positive change that John McCain’s gonna usher in." 

Plante then suggested that in her next sit-down interview, Palin should tap the reporter on the knee and ask, "So who you votin’ for?"

Palin laughed and said, "Yeah, maybe that just would say it all."

"I’m gonna try that," she said.

User Comments

You know the truth of the matter had the Media done there job of being journlaist maybe she would not have to bring it up Instaed they send 100′s of reporters to probe joe the plumber and Sarah Palins life Why then not send hundreds to hear more about WRIGHT AYERS KAHLIDI ETC…Oh yeah thats right he is “The One” I really liked the Matrix what a shame

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

What?! Does anyone know what she’s talking about? she sure doesn’t.

Posted by: dem in chicago | October 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

TALK ABOUT PALINS MEDICAL RECORDS ,THAT IS NOT HER CHILD,SHE SAID SHE WOULD RELEASE HER RECORDS THIS WEEK

Posted by: TERESA RICHARDSON | October 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

TALK ABOUT PALINS MEDICAL RECORDS ,THAT IS NOT HER CHILD,SHE SAID SHE WOULD RELEASE HER RECORDS THIS WEEK

Posted by: TERESA RICHARDSON | October 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

This is just one dumb BQ@th!!!Fck her and the hate train express.

Posted by: Richard Zing | October 31, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

TALK ABOUT PALINS MEDICAL RECORDS ,THAT IS NOT HER CHILD,SHE SAID SHE WOULD RELEASE HER RECORDS THIS WEEK
Posted by: TERESA RICHARDSON | Oct 31, 2008 11:38:50 AM
Where are Obamas

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Hilliary’s “girls” are gonna elect McCain and the “Obombaphilles” are gonna have to choke on it…

Posted by: hmn | October 31, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

what about Sen. Obamas medical file. Have you seen any??????

Posted by: USAfirst | October 31, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I have no idea what she is talking about. Her 1st amendment rights are not being abridged. The first amendment guarantees her right to free speech, not a hypothetical right to be free from the media critiquing it as negative. She can say whatever she wants as long as she does not libel anyone, but the media, through their own first amendment rights, can spin it any way they want as well. She really knows next to nothing of the Constitution or the Bill of Rights!

Posted by: TEB | October 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Palin-release your medical records

Posted by: june | October 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

You know the truth of the matter had the Media done there job of being journalist maybe we would know that Sarah doesn’t believe in America or our Amendment Rights. Oh ya, wait, if it will get her voted in to office then she is all for them. 2 faced piece of crap.
Let not forget Sarah Palin association’s with the radical Alaska Independence Party that wants to secede from this great country, the United States of America.
And here is a quote from Alaskan Independence Party founder Joe Voegler:
“The fires of Hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government, and I won’t be buried under their damn flag!”
I wonder how Palin explains her husband”s verified membership in the “ALASKIAN INDEPENDENCE PARTY?” Seems she doesn”t believe in the UNITED States of America, does she??

Posted by: becky | October 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Richard Zing – I hope you get hit by a bus. Now go back to picking at your zits and munching on cheetos while sitting in front of your computer all day, you pathetic waste of a human being.

Posted by: Evan | October 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Obama released his medical records months ago numbnuts.

Posted by: Jeremy | October 31, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

You are the reason Mrs. Palin that we have division in our country today! You spew all of this nonsence but never really say much. You will be the reason for MC Cains fall. I wish you a speedy return to Alaska were you are well know for your ETHICS
OBAMA For President

Posted by: mcar | October 31, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

She was allowed to say it, so how have her Free Speech Rights been violated? Reporters publishing her words, then labeling them as negative, is an example of both parties exercising free speech. She just doesn’t understand the Constitution.

Posted by: helloworld | October 31, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Is she friggin’ insane?????
You betcha, Charlie.

Posted by: 12_angry_men | October 31, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

I was a Hllary girl but now I’m an Obama supporter and have already voted for him. There is NO WAY someone could have possibly supported Hillary and vote McCain / Palin. Even Hilary would say that is crazy. A vote for McCain is NOT helping women. McCain has a terrible record voting on women’s issues and the woman he picked to run with him sets us back to the 1800′s. Get a grip and some sense my fellow girls and women – protect our daughters and future generations! VOTE OBAMA!

Posted by: ces | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Heh, I’m kinda amused no one bothers replyign to reddog0216 anymore. Everyone who actually can remember longer than the last talking points memo clearly remember the media frenzy over Wright, Ayers, etc – headlines for a week, questions in prime time debates, etc – and seems to have just written off reddog0216′s whining as more deserving of pity than reply.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

to all obama supporers – i have a question. i am first generation guy from india – but i take obama’s association “pattern” like that of write, rezko, faraah khan, ayers and the one he toasted for, as an afront to me – personally.
One question i have for all of you, please answer-
After 20-30 years an american born person who is hanging out with Osama Bin Laden – sitting in his audience – hanging out with him for decades – if contest an election. And if he is as smooth talker as Obama is – without experience – with all academic knowledge to win the debates -
Would you vote for that guy ?

Posted by: nim | October 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Obama released his medical records months ago numbnuts.
Posted by: Jeremy | Oct 31, 2008 11:44:10 AM
WRONG he released a Doctors note Thats it

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

How pathetic.. she screams she has first amendment rights and slams the media for their exercise of the same. what a hypocrite! How about this Sarah, you are a hypocrite, you cannot address issues so you run attacks against your opponent. Yes, they are negative. Yes, they are mostly lies. Yes, they are pathetic and only go to prove that you don’t give a rats behind about this country, cannot defend your own parties position, and can simply perform scripted character attacks. Care to attack my first amendment rights to call you what you are? Go right ahead.. and I hope you have a job when you get back to Alaska in November.. at least you will be well dressed.

Posted by: Mary Sue | October 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

wow – this woman gets dumber by the day.

Posted by: drew | October 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Reddog,
You need to do some research/reading. Palin is the most thinly vetted candidate in history. She doesn’t answer questions, she just says dumb things. We don’t need another moron in the Oval office.

Posted by: gwhiz | October 31, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

WRONG he released a Doctors note Thats it
Posted by: reddog0216 | Oct 31, 2008 11:48:17 AM
And that is all that is required, and that is more than Palin has released.

Posted by: Maverick | October 31, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

WRONG he released a Doctors note Thats it
Posted by: reddog0216 | Oct 31, 2008 11:48:17 AM
And that is all that is required, and that is more than Palin has released.
Posted by: Maverick | Oct 31, 2008 11:49:30 AM
Thats not a Record you Obama nuts are so blinded it amazes me

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I feel Ashley Todds rights has been violated.
Hey, if you cant go psycho and carve a “B” in your own face, call the cops and falsely accuse a supporter of your political opponent… then frankly this country isnt what it used to be.
I want all McCain/Palin supporters to join me in a nationwide protest by carving a “B” in your own face. That’ll show ‘em!

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Sarah Palin needs to have her background checked thoroughly herself, Why on earth would we want to check out Ayers,Wright or any of them,they are not running for an office She is, and with someone who has had 26 yrs to make a difference in washinton dc

Posted by: Liz diess | October 31, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

She is a total whack job who goes off half-cocked at all times. She’s talking about how crazy it is that democrats want to reduce defence spending, when mccain himself says he will cut defence spending. She is never on the same page as mccain. She mocks science (as well as mccain) at every turn, when they have no idea what they’re talking about. I’d feel a little safer with someone who actually thinks instead of the knee-jerk blather coming out of the mccain/palin (or is it palin/mccain) camp.

Posted by: sus | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Hello… Obama’s medical files were released, so were Bidens’, and McCain’s… the question is: What is Squeaky Palin hiding???
Palin complains about everything. So she is female – she knew this going in to the campaign, so get over it, Squeaky!

Posted by: Sandi | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Thats not a Record you Obama nuts are so blinded it amazes me
Posted by: reddog0216 | Oct 31, 2008 11:51:17 AM
And that is all that is required, and is more than palin has released.

Posted by: Maverick | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Hannity will be very happy because that’s the only knee Palin will keep tapping.

Posted by: watching | October 31, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Richard Zing: That is wholly inappropriate and adds nothing to the discussion. Evan is right – I hope you get hit by a bus too.

Posted by: Liv | October 31, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Reddog,
You need to do some research/reading. Palin is the most thinly vetted candidate in history. She doesn’t answer questions, she just says dumb things. We don’t need another moron in the Oval office.
Posted by: gwhiz | Oct 31, 2008 11:49:03 AM
Dumb by whos standards yours or the medias Can you not think for yourself.It is okay too Obama wont shut down critics completley until he is elected.

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

She has made it more evident she is not prepared to assume the post of V.P.
Its unfortunate that she is the 1st female Republican to be on the V.p. ticket when there are so many qualified women McCain could have chosen. That showed very poor judgement on his part!

Posted by: Dee | October 31, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

There you go, another look into the mind of a far far right neo-con, she with the power would seek to destroy freedom of the press. Neo-cons always seek the dark to do their dirty work.

Posted by: JR | October 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

What a dumb woman!! I bet John McCain cringes every time this woman opens her mouth. Read this again: “It’s sort of perplexing to me, because I’m a practical person and plainspoken also, but just cutting to the chase and calling things like I see them, just like most Americans.” It started out being a complete sentence, and then she wouldn’t shut up and it ended up being not a complete sentence. How does one do that?!!!

Posted by: hang | October 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

The woman is a complete joke…not to mention dumb as hell.

Posted by: dano | October 31, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Dumb by whos standards yours or the medias
Posted by: reddog0216
Id call anyone who thinks dinosaurs and man co-existed DUMB.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

** Dumb by whos standards **
—————————-
Posted by: reddog0216 | Oct 31, 2008 11:53:21 AM
Dumb by most everyone who has seen some of the stuff you have written.

Posted by: jdb | October 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

If you have any doubt what phony, hypocrisy is, you simply just look at 0bama.
On one hand, he lectures his subsidiaries selfishness, charity, contribution to the common good of the society.
On the other hand, he panders his blind followers by bribery, cash giveaways, $1000 if you vote for him.
He promises to take care of you, giving you opportunities to get into the middle class; yet, he leaves his own brother in poverty at $1 per month in his homeland, his aunt on the streets of Boston.
Mr. Bush answers the call of a Higher Father and you know what he has done in the past 8 years.
Mr. 0bama has his own Higher Father, and he is Karl Marx.

Posted by: d0 | October 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

So because the press exercises their first amendment right to talk about what Palin has said on the campaign trail, which Palin said using her first amendment rights while on the campaign trail…that means she is having her first amendment rights suppressed? Huh? You know what…do a better job presenting your case and maybe you don’t get negative press. Negativity begets negativity, especially when her brief record is far from spotless herself. She is just making excuses now, and excuses are for losers.

Posted by: Ordermonger | October 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

How come Palin isn’t just as concerned about Mccain?
Before he died of leukemia in 1999, retired Col. Ted Guy, a highly admired POW and one of the most dogged resisters in the camps, wrote an angry open letter to the senator in an MIA newsletter—a response to McCain’s stream of insults hurled at MIA activists. Guy wrote: “John, does this [the insults] include Senator Bob Smith [a New Hampshire Republican and activist on POW issues] and other concerned elected officials? Does this include the families of the missing where there is overwhelming evidence that their loved ones were ‘last known alive’? Does this include some of your fellow POWs?”

Posted by: Steve W | October 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

We lost the chance of a democratic presidency when the idiots put Sen. Hillary Clinton out of the race. Too bad!
Now we are stuck with an inexperienced politician whose past and present close friendships with hateful anti-American people will be a major factor in the voting booth. It saddens me to do it, but I will be voting for the Republican ticket on November 4.
At least, in my own opinion, John McCain is a true American who will never compromise the values and security of our great nation.
We need a president who is and has always been proud of USA and who, under no circumstances, belittles or bad-mouths my country as Obama, his wife, and his pastor do.
We need a president –democrat or republican– who is a tested leader and who instills American greatness and pride in our children. That leader is John McCain.
I will never vote for a shady and an inexperienced politician like Obama just for the sake of party loyalty. Party loyalty went out of the doors when the democratic party leaders kicked out our candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and replaced her with Barack Hussein Obama. It was a stupid thing to do for them but, at least, we have a good alternative in John McCain.

Posted by: Salisbury | October 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Why did two ABC reporters issue apologies to the Obama campaign yesterday?
Was ABC threatened with having their reporters booted off the plane?????
That’s the type of thing Palin is talking about.

Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

TALK ABOUT PALINS MEDICAL RECORDS ,THAT IS NOT HER CHILD,SHE SAID SHE WOULD RELEASE HER RECORDS THIS WEEK
Posted by: TERESA RICHARDSON | Oct 31, 2008 11:38:50 AM
***************
I was thinking the same thing!!!
I never believe she was the mother of that child!!!!!
Republicans are HIDING HER MEDICAL RECORDS!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Posted by: samurai | October 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Palin does not understand our Constitution says.
It’s real obvious.

Posted by: newz4i | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

hey nim,
you run for office in this country and see what happens to you
(ever heard of caste system?)

Posted by: really | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Hmmmmm………. Does that even make sense?
She is free to make whatever statements she wants and the press is free to say how reticules they are.
How is that supression of speech? Sounds more like she would silence the press, but the press would want to keep her talking.

Posted by: Thinking | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

It’s interesting to me. Sarah Palin came along a few months ago and was readily accepted. She wasn’t even vetted. The republicans immediately accepted her, without knowing much about her.
Barack Obama has been campaigning for almost 2 years, and some of the knuckle-heads continue to say they don’t know enough about him!
They don’t know enough about Senator Obama because they don’t want to know. When the truth is told it’s not believed.
This is very strange to me.
I don’t know why Sarah would be complaining about her 1st amendment rights! When she says something no one can understand it! At this point who cares what she says!
Dan Quayle is brilliant compared to Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Shay | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

YEAH cause the L.A. Times is a good reliable source

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I’m surprised Palin even knows what the 1st amendment is. Guess that’s as far as she was able to read as she obviously missed the part on what the job of a VP entails. If she’s okay with calling out Obama & his associations then she must be okay with me asking her about her witchcraft pastor & her association with the secessionist organization in AK? How about it, Palin? Pony up w/the truth! You betcha :)

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

ABC I think you should give reddog0216, Palin and McCain their wish. Maybe the media can do their job the next 3 days and vet the McCain/Palin team. Tell us all about their dirty dealings and the dirty people they associate and associated themselves with. All the bills McCain voted on with Bush, all the missing money in Alaska that is under investigation since Palin took office. Oh, ya, don’t leave out her modest half million dollar home.
Then, how about a really deep look into their policies and what they will truly do for their Nation. (which I am sure the pass speaks for itself, no one really changes)

Posted by: becky | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Hello nim,
As an Obama supporter I can tell you that I find the guilt by association argument baseless and tired. This line of attack is just masked bigotry whether you want to admit it or not.
Your attack is weak, just like your candidate’s position (and appeal).
When you’re through telling us why we shouldn’t vote for Obama, maybe you could share one reason why we should vote for McCain. I haven’t heard anything in weeks.
Good luck on Tuesday.

Posted by: really | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

No one cares that the media (other than Fox news) wants to get to the bottom of who this hollywood candidate is? Is it so bad to ask questions about his anti americanism? His associations? His communist bent?
Do people hate the label republican so bad that they have to vote for a communist? People need to wake up and understand that even the people in Venezuela regret their choice and not it is too late. Their freedoms are gone.

Posted by: Chip | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | Oct 31, 2008 12:00:18 PM
Better yet, where are her psychological records.. I bet she has a drawer full somewhere given her unstable nature.

Posted by: jdb | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

PALIN IS A SUPERBABE.
NOBODY THAT I KNOW WOULD HAVE SURVIVED A 7-WEEK LONG ATTACK ON THEIR PERSON WITHOUT BREAKING DOWN EXCEPT SARAH PALIN.
REMEMBER OBAMA RAN TO THE BAHAMAS DURING JEREMIAH WRIGHT.
PALIN NEVER WENT ANYWHERE..JUST PLUGGING AWAY.. CAMPAIGNING.
SHE PROMISED PENNSYLVANIA. THE POLLS NOW INDICATE 4-POINT LEAD FROM 13-POINTS LAST WEEK..
EVEN IF SHE DOESNT DELIVER–SHE IS STILL A SUPERBABE.

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | October 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

From a former Obama speech writer:
Governor Palin and I don’t agree on a lot of things, mostly social issues. But I have grown to appreciate the Governor. I was one of those initial skeptics and would laugh at the pictures. Not anymore. When someone takes on a corrupt political machine and a sitting governor, that is not done by someone with a low I.Q. or a moral core made of tissue paper. When someone fights her way to get scholarships and work her way through college even in a jagged line, that shows determination and humility you can’t learn from reading Reinhold Niebuhr. When a mother brings her son with special needs onto the national stage with love, honesty, and pride, that gives hope to families like mine as my older brother lives with a mental disability. And when someone can sit on a stage during the Sarah Palin rap on Saturday Night Live, put her hands in the air and watch someone in a moose costume get shot—that’s a sign of both humor and humanity.

Posted by: Tessa | October 31, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Palin may have a First Amendment right to spout lies and nonsense. The media also has a First Amendment right to call her out for the negative garbage. Looks to me like Palin wants it all one way…surprise, surprise.

Posted by: Lee | October 31, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

So under Palin’s view of the first amendment, who tells the media what they’re allowed to say?

Posted by: Jagoff | October 31, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Palin you have all the freedom to talk anything you want, whether it makes sense or not.
We, the people who heard what you said, we judged you as negative. It is the same when we talked about your pregnant daughter, you judged us being negative.

Posted by: FM | October 31, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Shaking my head…
~Deep sigh, would somebody please take her back to her campaign bus to play with her Caribou Barbie Colorforms.~

Posted by: mdj | October 31, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Remember when she called Hillary a whiner? It’s like everything that comes out of their mouth is, in reality, the opposite of the truth. I used to say she was a pleasant person — now I just think she is ignorant, a bigot and the worst candidate ever put up as Vice President. I went from leaning McCain to just turning the tv off every time I hear her Palin. He gets no vote from me this year. Plus, with all this hate mongering, I feel the GOP has narrowed it’s vision of America and left my centrist views out of their tent. I will vote for a Demorcrat for the first time in many years. I’m not sure if I will ever go back given that narrowing tent of the GOP. The GOP is killing itself by giving into the far right as its only base.

Posted by: Jim in California | October 31, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

What she needs is brain.
My 12 years old daughter she’s smarter than her.
I am sick and tired of her stupidity.
GO AWAY PLEASE AND TAKE WITH YOU THE PLUMBER.
LOOSERS….

Posted by: A.E | October 31, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

where is Obama’s Birth Certificate

Posted by: chris | October 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

What if the reporter say he/she is voting for Ron Paul?

Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Why doesn’r Palin talk about this?
McCain was a pilot on the carrier Forrestal, off the coast of Vietnam, when one of the worst accidents in Navy history killed 134 crew members and damaged or destroyed various aircraft, including McCain’s.
Surviving crewmen and those who investigated the Forrestal fire case reported that McCain deliberately ‘wet-started’ his A-4E Skyhawk to shake up the guy in the F-4 Phantom behind his A-4. ‘Wet-starts’, done either deliberately (the starter motor switch allowed kerosene to pool in the engine and give a wet start) or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft. In McCain’s case, the ‘wet-start’ ‘cooked off’ and launched the M34 Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that punctured the Skyhawk’s fueltank, knocked the M-65 1000 lb bomb off it’s 500 lb rated mount, and touched off the explosions and massive fire. The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration, along with 167 of his fellow Forrestal shipmates (including those who died later from wounds suffered). ‘Wet starting’ was a common practice among young ‘hot-dog’ pilots. McCain was quickly (they were still counting the Forrestal dead) transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred).

Posted by: Steve W | October 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Has this stupid, stupid woman ever read the First Amendment? It’s a very novel interpretation of the First Amendment to say that it exists to prevent the press from criticizing public officials! Maybe that’s what she learned in “journalism school” in Idaho . . .

Posted by: Tom in California | October 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Wow, she sounds more bizarre and stupid everytime she opens her mouth. I’m in amazement that anyone would consider voting for her!
I’m guessing she has so little knowledge of the US political process that she thinks the Constitution is easily changed …. along the same lines that she thought she would control the Senate as VP. What an absolute ignoramus … she is the true symptom of what is wrong with America … or, perhaps in a more optimistic light, she is a product of a highly corrupt state, Alaska!

Posted by: Anna B | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

What if they ask about Keating5?
Is that ok ?

Posted by: David K | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Let’s just change the definition of “negative attack” to make the pretty girl happy. USA! USA! Change the definition of torture, victory, socialism, anything we need to so all the crybaby Republican victims out there can have there closed society and wars.
Get bent!

Posted by: smart! | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

lot of people are asking Sarah medical Records. I am asking where is OBAMA Medical Record.
They just showed 1 page report prepared by a doctor and released. I want the CT SCAN of his brain, so that we can find out how much his smoking crack and other drugs destroyed his brain.
I am an African American for McCain

Posted by: adam | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Sarah Palin is a Marxist
Alaska: America’s Socialist State
Sarah Palin’s home state of Alaska is the MOST Socialist state in these United States, and she’s proud of it!
Alaska has no income or sales tax!
That’s because it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields.
First the state government takes it’s hefty cut, then it redistributes the wealth, cutting a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state.
Sarah Palin was happy to increase this year’s check by $1200, bringing the per-person total to $3,269, helping her maintain her popularity as Governor.
I wonder how that’s not “buying” votes?
Sarah Palin is proud of her state’s collective wealth-redistribution scheme.
Sarah Palin said,
“We’re set up, unlike other states in the union,
where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources.
So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.”
Right out of the Karl Marx play book!

Posted by: JoeSixGunSixPackTheProAmericanPlumber | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

What if they ask about Keating5?
Is that ok ?

Posted by: David K | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

What if they ask about Keating5?
Is that ok ?

Posted by: David K | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

If Mme palin had her way, There would be no amendments left.except the right to bear arms!
In the past weeks nothing proactive has come from this quarter.
McCain/Palin merely stand there, arms folded and spout negativity.
What’s their plan, where are their proposals?

Posted by: Edwardc00 | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Funny. Palin a govt’ job that pays her
a six-figure salary. She’s got gov’t health care. Gov’t pension. Gov’t offices. Gov’t expense account. Gov’t paid-for air travel, for her and all her kids. She has over $1 million in assets. She never worked ANY job outside of gov’t in her life, except a short spell as a media-type with a small tv station.
In short, Palin has leached money off taxpayers for most of her whole adult life, and has never had to worry about healthcare or benefits.
Yet, she will happily tell you how evil the gov’t is and how bad it is that the gov’t takes your money and “spreads the wealth” . . . to people who work in the gov’t.
Funny.

Posted by: BillyBob | October 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Not only is Palin dumb as a rock, she’s a megalomaniac with delusions of grandeur. She ACTUALLY thinks if she’s elected as VP she would ‘be in charge’ of the senate.
Thats just …wow. Bizarre and surreal. Is there a record of another candidate ever saying or even hinting something that DUMB???
If Palin gets into the White House it would be like having a very retarded female Putin as VP or worse.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

For the sake of our country. Please vote McCain. You will regret voting for a communist. Please don’t. For our childrens sake. Let them be able to work hard, make as much money as they want, provide jobs without being punished. Sending checks and rewarding people for not working is not a good idea. It takes all the will to succeed out of them and we will just have more and more people expecting handouts. This isn’t good for our great country. Please. Vote for McCain and not the Communist ticket.

Posted by: Ted | October 31, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

2 months of negative ads, and now whining about how all this press coverage is oppressing her?
The disastrous McCain campaign illustrates precisely why Republicans deserve to lose and lose badly. Here’s hoping the once-great GOP can leave the neo-con era behind once and for all.

Posted by: michael the conservative | October 31, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

While not yet as severe this guilt by association, so vigorously promulgated by Gov Palin, looks and sounds an awful lot like McCarthyism. Once again we are at risk of being branded “Unamerican” or “Unpatriotic” just because we might have sat in the same room with, or had a conversation with, someone who doesn’t measure up to the ultra-right wing notion of acceptability. Been there, done that, don’t want to go back!

Posted by: Bnd4Me | October 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Sarah, give it a rest. Your stupidity is getting boring.

Posted by: counting crows | October 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

She freely spouted those words, and the media and public are free to interpret them as the see fit.

Posted by: champgrow | October 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Is she this stupid, or does she think everyone else is? This is one more of the idiotic scare tactics.
People disagreeing with you, people asking you to back up your assertion, does not “take away” your freedom of speech.
She’s still talking, right? “Freedom of speech” isn’t the same as compelling people to believe what you are saying.
Is she a rube, or does she think we all are? Or maybe she just knows that her intended audience is going to accept what she says without thinking too hard about it.

Posted by: KB | October 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I used to support Barack Obama, but the reason Gov. Palin is viewed so unfavorably by the public is because the mainstream media premised it so. Did you see that CNN interview where a CNN reporter puportedly “quoted” a promininent conservative as saying Gov. Palin is stupid and corrupt, when in fact the prominent conservative said the media made her out to be stupid and corrupt? Viewers are left with the validation that, hey, even a prominent conservative thinks she’s stupid and corrupt, therefore, she must be… and by guilt-by-association, Sen. McCain must lack judgement, too. Did you see the Katie Couric interview? For the week leading up to the broadcast, they showed snippets, like the Obama campaign butchering Sen. McCain’s quotes, they showed snippets that made Gov. Palin look clueless, but when they showed the entire interview, she was coherent! Gov. Palin answered the questions just like Sen. Obama’s style: detailed and elaborated. Did you see Charlie Gibson’s interview? Mr. Gibson asked Gov. Palin, “what do you think of the Bush Doctrine?” and when Gov. Palin replied, “which one, and which part, Charlie?” Mr. Gibson made that John Stewart, “are you stupid?” appalled look. The fact is, the mainstream media has coined a myriad of distinct foreign policies as “Bush Doctrine”s, from spreading freedom and democracy to pre-emptive strikes. And now, the LA Times is bragging about holding back a video of Sen. Obama praising an unapologetic terrorist, whom to this day he calls a “respected scholar,” as if an Ivy League professorship justifies his terroristic behavior, because he is someone better than us regular people, us small-town Americans who cling to our Second Amendment and faith as a way to explain our bitterness and frustrations. The fact is this: we don’t know enough about Sen. Obama, and that is not a McCain talking point. It is the truth, and not just the arguable truth, and not just it-happens-to-be truth, it is the truth by design, because the mainstream media knows that if the American people got to know who Sen. Obama is, they would find it relevant and appalling.

Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

God we are SICK of you pathetic trolls. no one cares about your so-called claims about Obama OK?
WE DON’T CARE! It is not important to us and most of America. Face it, your ideology FAILED and you are the MINORITY.
Get used to it. We had to live with your rule of idiocy for too long.
The time for civility is OVER. We tried to disucss intellgently, using issues and facts, and you REFUSE.
SO…FCK YOU. FCK the GOP. YOu are hatemongering racist idiot dolt who don’t even understand the WORDS YOU USE.
call me what you want, we don’t care anymore. Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the NEXT President and YOU LOST!!!!!!!!
YOu ideology was REJECTED by America.
Why can you not see this?
there is no conspiracy.
there is no secret plan
these is no information we don;t have
there in nothing we have “ignored”
We simply just DON’T FCKING CARE ABOUT YOUR HATE FILLED LIES.
Go ahead, keep commenting, you are being completely ignored at this point, We all get good laughs at the flailing around of you racist dolts.
You don’t even know what socialism IS!
Fools, your rule of idiocy is OVER!

Posted by: GOP is DOA | October 31, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Since, it seems, everyone else is either oblivious, or too afraid to say it, I will. The ONLY reason Sarah Palin is being treated so poorly is because she is a Christian Conservative. It is clear that those who are treating her so badly are the Jews and their cohorts. They do not want the Christian right to have power in the Republican Party. Their reason for choosing John McCain was to move the party to the center and diminish the influence of the Evangelicals. However, with the choice of Sarah Palin, the Christian Conservatives are, again, front and center. The Jews do not like this at all, so they are doing everything they can to destroy her. They are also worried that she will bring out the Evangelical vote, and they should be, because she will.

Posted by: KMB | October 31, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Isn’t calling her retarded attacks on Obama negative the media’s first amendment right too?

Posted by: Skeptic | October 31, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Ever since Katie Couric made her look like a friggin clueless idiot, she has been shielded from the media (except for Faux News, which is about as close to journalism as Joe the Plumber is to being a plumber).
She was not vetted and they are trying to scam the American public by hiding her from any questions.
Its not her experience that is troubling it is that we know nothing about her. Obama has been on the trail for two years and 50 debates. We know that he is articulate, intelligent, has a grasp of the complex issues, ran an outstanding and well orchestrated campaign and made is first decision, Joe Biden, with careful thought and to provide a balance to his ticket.
Bottom line. People like her because she is hot, has a cute accent and speaks in simple platitudes that idiots glom onto.

Posted by: Dave | October 31, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

You know what this means: Sarah Palin’s finally gotten as far as the first amendment in her assigned readings. Hopefully, she’ll get to the 4th before the election. I know Bush didn’t.

Posted by: Coco Lopez | October 31, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Poor Sarah. She’s never been the same since she got trashed at that Big Lake poker run and fell off her Arctic Cat.
Sweetie, here’s the full text of the First Amendment. If you can’t quite understand it, ask Barack. He knows a lot about the Constitution. The bottom line is, unless Congress made a law instructing the media to attack you, you just made yourself (and by extension, all Alaskans) look like an utter clueless moron. Again. And on behalf of your fellow Alaskans, I gotta say, it’s getting a little old.
If you’re still confused, let’s get together at the Silver Fox (assuming it’s still in business), we’ll have a beer, and I’ll spell it out for you.
*****
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | October 31, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

SOME SAY PALIN IS A DRAG ON MCCAIN TICKET
MCCCAIN NEVER HAD A TICKET UNTIL SHE CAME ALONG..
LOOK AT THE THRONG SHE ATTRACKS..
I WENTB TO ONE OF HER RALLIES.. IT WAS LIKE WAITING FOR THE ROLLING STONES.. NO KIDDING. RESPECT, HONOR, DEEP DEVOTION FROM HER SUPPORTERS.
THE ONLY DRAG ON THE TICKET IS THE ECONOMY AND THE FACT SOMEONE IS SENDING UNHLOY AMOUNTS OF MONEY SO OBAMA COULD BUY THEM AMERICA.
$700 MILLION AND THEN THE ECONOMY COLLAPSED– OBAMA JUST GOT A LUCKY BREAK.
HOWEVER THE QUESTION, IF ITS A TIE NOW, WONDER WHAT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED HAD THE ECONOMY NOT COLLAPSED AND HE KEPT HIS WORD ON CAMPAIGN FINANCING ..GOT ONLY $85 MILLION LIKE MCCAIN.
RIGHT NOW IT FEELS WEIRD , ONE MAN HAS SO MUCH MONEY , DOING INFOMERCIALS AND THE OTHER GUY HAS LITTLE..NOT FAIR
UNAMERICAN.

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | October 31, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Remember how Sarah Palin called Hillary a whiner during the primaries???
Earl was right: Karma IS a biatch.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Everyone knows the truth about Obama and Ayers. That is why the media will not report on it, because we already know that it is a stretch to say that Obama “pals around with terrorists.”
The MSM knows the real story is that the GOP needs to lie to win. That is why they report on Sarah Palin instead of Willian Ayers. Sarah Palin is a liar, at least Ayers admits that what he has done.

Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Boy, the Republicans sure know how to point their finger and shift the blame….Of course it’s not her fault…it’s Obamas— The Muslim, Terrorist, Leftist, socialist, Marxist, tax Raiser, wealth spreader. did i get them all??? They act like pre-school kids

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Wow. She apparently doesn’t understand the way the constitution works at all. The media can’t take away your first amendment rights by calling into question accusations that you make. The government is the only entity that can take away your first amendment rights.

Posted by: Shawn | October 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

This is just more evidence that Palin is incapable of the kind of clear thinking that we need in a candidate for high office. I mean, her logic is difficult to follow. Because the press criticizes her it is denying her right to “free speech?” Isn’t that what free speech is about – having a press that is free to criticize our public officials?
One wonder what parallel universe she has been living in up to this point.

Posted by: jbrinkmeyer | October 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Palin’ dishonest hate-filled slanderous attacks are protected by the 1st amendment, as are the press’s freedom to label them as such. Obama does not “pal around with terrorists”. that’s a stupid and ugly thing to say. Obama is not a socialist. that idiot doesn’t even know what a socialist is. Palin panders to the red meat right wing crowd that’s looking for someone to hate. Really ugly.

Posted by: Larry | October 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I WAS swinging toward voting for John McCain UNTIL he announced that Palin was his running mate….I think he would have been better off with Paris Hilton (Seriously!)
condoleezza rice would have been the PERCECT runningmate….I think the unwise choice of Palin was the mail in the coffin for McCain’s campaigne.

Posted by: Scott P | October 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

@TJ, THE CLINTONITE
You are the perfect example of a scumbag dumb idiot.
Repsect is out the door.
Fck of you pathetic POS.
YOU are UnAmerican you slimebag loser.
Enjoy your minority.
Lucky break huh? Like 9/11 …..you POS?

Posted by: GOP is DOA | October 31, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Ya gotta wonder whether Sarah Palin (SarahSixPack.com) is going to be the GOP’s standard bearer for 2012, or whether she’ll just be a footnote in history. Obama (ObamaAgain2012) is a shoo-in this go-round, and it’s very likely that he’ll effectively use the power of his incumbency in ’12 to win a second term. Question is: Will Palin’s star power within the GOP continue all the way into 2016? Or isn’t it more likely that many brighter (!) GOP stars will emerge during the next 8 years?

Posted by: edwards | October 31, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHA…it won’t matter, McSame / Failin are going to lose!! get ready to welcome your next President, Mr. Barrack Obama! get used to it
——————–
Hilliary’s “girls” are gonna elect McCain and the “Obombaphilles” are gonna have to choke on it…
Posted by: hmn | Oct 31, 2008 11:40:02 AM

Posted by: Mike | October 31, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

If you take out all the random verbs, gerunds, participle phrases, and prepositions, what she’s asking for is permission to use the “N” word.

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Like most gossips, she asserts her rights to free speech while tossing out opinionated crap, yet doesn’t recognize the media’s free speech when they criticize her. We’re not allowed to interpret her trash talk as negative campaigning because only her opinions matter, right? And of course, out comes the extreme paranoia – the First Amendment is in imminent danger because the press criticizes little Sarah. It isn’t simply a grown-up difference of interpretation, no – it’s a deadly assault on democracy. I’ve never seen a more absurd or poorer choice for VP in my entire life, and that includes Agnew.

Posted by: TerryD | October 31, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I WAS swinging toward voting for John McCain UNTIL he announced that Palin was his running mate….I think he would have been better off with Paris Hilton (Seriously!)
condoleezza rice would have been the PERCECT runningmate….I think the unwise choice of Palin was the nail in the coffin for McCain’s campaigne.

Posted by: Scott P | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

> PALIN IS A SUPERBABE.
> NOBODY THAT I KNOW WOULD HAVE SURVIVED
> A 7-WEEK LONG ATTACK ON THEIR PERSON
> WITHOUT BREAKING DOWN EXCEPT SARAH
> PALIN
Actually she was almost crying when she was found guilty of ethics violations. And I’m pretty sure you don’t know her, but Paris Hilton (who you know just as well, if not better) lasted a lot longer than 7 weeks.
So I guess the bottom line is: Paris Hilton is as qualified as Sarah Palin.
-Dan

Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Tom,
You forgot “and he’s black”.
President Obama! Get used to it!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

What a great day it will be when this woman goes back to Alaska. Except for Alaska.

Posted by: ericmiami | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Palin, you need some educating about the First Amendment. Your rights have in no way been compromised, but it seems as though you are advocating that you should be able to restrict the First Amendment rights of those who disagree with you. Just like on everything else, constitutional rights only seem to apply to those who agree with you. Take your dangerous political philosophies back to Alaska, with your Alaskan Socialist ideas about the state’s “resources.”

Posted by: Stan | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Wow, apparently Palin hasn’t been aware of a person called George Bush, who like Cheney, labels anyone who disagrees with them traitors and Anti-American. Sarah Palin most likely doesn’t understand what the 1st Amendment is about in the first place. We have the most repressive Administration in history now and she is whining that her attacks are not being taken or inferred in the way that would be beneficial to her and the GOP party. HAHAHA, I wish someone would ask her what’s the capitol of Alaska, and please play the Jeopardy music while we wait.

Posted by: Remus | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

You McCain supporters do not exist in real life.
I have never heard a good reason from anyone, face to face, to supoprt McCain.
You can’t run from a face to face conversatiom, so you don’t have them, just like the Palin interviews. You avoid any REAL dialouge
Instead you come to the internet where you can post drive-by bullsh!t and run away.
In the cube or office next to you, someone is voting for Obama. I doubt you EVER had a discussion about why are voting for McCan, becasue your reasoning would expose you stupidity.
Here you are anonymous.

Posted by: GOP is DOA | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Speaking of past associations…She was/is a supporter and her husband was a member of thew Alaskan Independent Party. The founder of this party said this…The gates of hell are glaciers compared to the hatred I have for the United States of America and her damned laws. Anyone care to probe that association??? huh?

Posted by: old salt | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Tessa: When someone takes on a corrupt political machine and a sitting governor, that is not done by someone with a low I.Q. or a moral core made of tissue paper.
———
Be careful, I have a feeling when they find all that missing money that has taken place during her governing, she would be classified as corrupt also.

Posted by: becky | October 31, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

This is the clearest indication that she does not understand the constitution. Her right of free speach is not infringed upon by someone saying she “has gone negative” or even when one says she is lying.
As far as the negativity, then hypocrasy of accusing someone of doing the same things McCain has done goes… someone needs to be taken to the woodshed & given the spanking of their lives.

Posted by: fjs | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

ABC I think you should give reddog0216, Palin and McCain their wish. Maybe the media can do their job the next 3 days and vet the McCain/Palin team. Tell us all about their dirty dealings and the dirty people they associate and associated themselves with. All the bills McCain voted on with Bush, all the missing money in Alaska that is under investigation since Palin took office. Oh, ya, don’t leave out her modest half million dollar home.
Then, how about a really deep look into their policies and what they will truly do for their Nation. (which I am sure the pass speaks for itself, no one really changes)
Posted by: becky | Oct 31, 2008 12:01:09 PM
Hey and right after all of that maybe they can get the tape from the L.A.TIMES and let all of you get a glimpse of whats to come from OBAMANATION .Can anyone explain why Obama has now backed his tax cuts up to 150,000 and why no mention of nuclear power as he promised in the debate during his infomercial But wait there more for the first hundred callers we will send you double the offer thats right I am going to clone myself so I can do two things at once

Posted by: reddog0216 | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

For the record I would like to say that I hope everybody can avoid getting hit by a bus today. BTW Palin is psycho.

Posted by: Membery | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

To say palling around is an obvious over-statement. To call an established type of economics, one that John McCain is on video encouraging just a few years ago, socialist is negative. It’s on beyond negative, it’s dangerous and unhealthy for the country. So what is she doing? …telling the media to shut up? That’s no country I want to live in. As Voltiare said (paraphrase), I disagree with what you say, and would die for the right of you to say it. Who is squelching who here. This truly angers me. If she can’t handle media opinion she can’t handle a terrorist.

Posted by: akamai | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Posted by: jbrinkmeyer | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Does this make sense? Here’s the first amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
How are Palin’s “first amendment rights” being threatened here? Seems to me that she’s suggesting that the press shouldn’t comment on the tone of her statements. Isn’t that an infringement on the press’s first amendment rights?

Posted by: secretinsidegirl | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

How dumb can that be? The first amendment guarantees freedom of expression to ALL. She can say what she wants, as everybody else including the media can say what they want!

Posted by: audiophileman | October 31, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Um, Sarah, drilling down on opponents’ issues is one thing; inciting hatred, telling outright lies, stereotyping, calling part of the country “pro-German”, I mean, America, character assasination and racist inuendo is another. If that is your idea of “free speech” then maybe you should be explaining why your tactics are eerily reminicent of “innocent” rallies of pre-war Germany circa 1939.

Posted by: lily | October 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

June—–release your medical records.
Or will you now attack my 1st amendment rights?
Obama wana make a Donna Reed America—can’t happen with the NASTY supporters he has.

Posted by: sue | October 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

So Sarah Palin refuses to let reporters from ANY newspaper ask her ANY questions, and Obama is the bad guy because he kicks of 3 reporters?
Hypocracy is the new definition of the McCain campaign.
HOW MANY THINGS WILL THEY DO, AND THEN COMPLAIN WHEN OBAMA DOES IT AFTERWARDS?
Examples:
Sarah AND Obama are celebrities.
Wright AND Hagee are racist preachers.
Dodd AND Graham are lobbying liars.
Liddy AND Ayers were terrorists.
McCain’s homes AND Obama’s home are shady.
EVERYTHING THAT MCCAIN AND PALIN COMPLAIN ABOUT THEY HAVE DONE THEMSELVES.
At least Obama has good policies that will help everyday people instead of more help to the rich.

Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Palin is fearing that her right to free speech is threatened? This, after her campaign has threatened our right to ask common-sense questions like how she, as a parent, is going to take care of five kids with one going to be a teenage mother and another, a newborn with special needs, if she is elected VP by calling us “sexist”? (Can you imagine if it was Obama who had such a family, how would we respond?) After she attacked the media’s legitimate questions as “disrespectful”? (And we all now know from McCain’s aides that she was just not ready! What a surprise!)
No one wants to limit your right to speech, Ms Palin. But don’t think for a moment that you can take away our right to think of your speech as negative, unfair and divisive. You’ve spent the whole time distorting (note: not questioning — you didn’t question; you asserted Obama pals around with terrorists.) Obama’s associations and questioning his inexperience. Obama has never questioned yours — not once did he raise the issue that your very own husband was for years a member of the secessionist Alaskan Independence Party and not once did he say that the state you govern has a smaller population than even his constituency when he was an Illinois state senator. This is what we mean by running a positive and decent campaign.

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 31, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Palin, America will never put a woman to power ever. Other countries will but not America. This is a man’s country baby and will stay that way. Women will always play a subservient role here of course you’ll get your token position here and there, that’s only natural. Well maybe one day when women support each other NOT that will never happen. American women don’t support each other.

Posted by: Job | October 31, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Sarah Palin has just stooped quite low saying her enticing crowd rage for hate mongering is honorable!!! She is saying it’s ok if riots occur, someone gets killed, vandalism becomes serious problem, and worst of all assassination attempts.
Sarah Palin would be arrested by FBI if she conducted such enticement as a US citizen. Republican overseen FBI are keeping crowd rage away from Public. FBI won’t let any reporters anywhere near crows at rallies.
Sarah Palin has no honor or integrity. But then she also was just ofund to have committed abuse of power as Governor of Alaska!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | October 31, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Obama, Biden, and John McCain have released some of their medical records. Sarah Palin has released none. On October 22nd, she told Brian Williams that if she released her medical records they would show her as happy, healthy and having had five children. This was taken as an indication that she would release her records. The campaign confirmed that they would release her records. Now, it seems her records are not going to be released before the elections. It seems that the only conclusion any rational person can draw is that she does not release her records because there is something damaging to her in it. Either she is not healthy, happy or has not had five children.
Like millions of others, this has become the number one campaign issue for me. On September 1st, rather than issue her medical records proving that Trig was her biological son, Palin threw her own daughter under the bus by revealing that she was unwed and five months pregnant, which meant that she couldn’t be Trig’s mother. The actual number of months pregnant has not been independently confirmed by any doctor.
What is in Sarah Palin’s medical records that she is willing to throw her own daughter under a bus and mislead Brian Williams rather than reveal them?

Posted by: Jay Raskin | October 31, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Evan, hopefully someone drags you from the bumper of their car you waste of oxygen. Now get back to your internet porn addiction.

Posted by: Evan isabitch | October 31, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Once again, this vice-presidential hopeful shows that she has no idea of what the Constitution is. The McCain has done its best to stifle the free press, starting with saying they would only make her available for interviews if the press were polite and showed deference to her. As for this interviewer’s suggestion that “in her next sit-down interview, Palin should tap the reporter on the knee and ask, ‘So who you votin’ for?’ and she thinks it’s a good idea: That is quite a joke! She should have started with that “interviewer, Chris Plante. As Palin said, “Yeah, maybe that just would say it all.” Most of her sit-down interviews are with conservative interviewers, and I’d love to know who they are voting for. Their refusal to ask her questions about Troopergate, AIP, ignorance about role of VP, etc etc etc, is the REAL threat to the First Amendment.

Posted by: useyourbrainspeople | October 31, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Stevens will win his Senate seat in Alaska, then the Senate will vote him out. The governor of the state (palin) is the one who then appoints the new senator for the state of Alaska, and she will appoint… Sarah Palin as the new Senator of Alaska.
This gets her out of the state, where they will start investigations on her, and put her in Washington in the National spot light, and away from Alaska.
Following the Hillary playbook.

Posted by: Independent realist | October 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Have you looked at the demographics of the Obama base and the demographics of the McCain/Palin base? Obama base is made up of either younger or middle aged educated Americans where the McCain/Palin base are older and uneducated. By looking at some of these blogs, I can tell that these McCain people must have just gotten back from watching a nascar race or a WWF event in their single wide trailer. The problem is mis-informed. Most McCain fans get their information from word of mouth from their hillbilly neighbors (Palin) and believe it to be Gods word. McCain/Palin fans: do yourself and us a favor and research the truth before having your next bought of diarrhea of the mouth. Were sick of hearing your nonsense!

Posted by: don | October 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

“How dumb can that be? The first amendment guarantees freedom of expression to ALL. She can say what she wants, as everybody else including the media can say what they want!”
That is true up to the point where she starts inciting riots.
I don’t know about you, but the last time I saw this many idiots blindly following someone to the point where they yell out “kill him” in a crowd was in 1940.
Sarah “hitler” Palin needs to realize that her words incite riots, maybe if she cared at all about America she would realize this. It is too bad that she is the type of politician that will step on your face if it means she can get a little higher on the ladder of life.

Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

nim – your question plays right into the GOP strategy: repeat a lie often enough, and it becomes the perceived truth. The McCain campign has repeated the red herring about about Ayers and Khalidi so many times that folks like you are led away from the true issues at hand. Don’t be fooled by that nonsense.

Posted by: bubba | October 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Someone needs to teach Palin about the Constitution. Her First Amendment Rights only keeps the government from censoring her free speech. That she wants to use that amendment to control what the media say about her speaks volumes about her ignorance about basic rights and how she will use that ignorance to abuse other peoples rights.

Posted by: Ferrous Patella | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

This…
uneducated Dim bulb was picked by John McCain to be Vice President … I think johns ability to make sound choices is quite apparent.

Posted by: Squierghia74 | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

If the media did their job, Palin’s membership in the AIP and the loony “prayer warriors” cult would be getting some real coverage. Her blatant inexperience and lack of knowledge alone would have already sunk McCain’s campaign completely if the media did its job.

Posted by: Bob D | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Truth be told it is the Repubs who have knocked down the rights of free speech, rather the neocon right that Palin is in the pocket of. Who do you think is the RNC? They are the fat cats who would spend 150 k on designer clothes. Deal with the likes of the S&L scandal, redistribute the wealth to the top 1% and on top of this, and hear me all those who support the politics of the past. The world is in the 21st century. Crying to your republican, Right media outlets will not get you votes. In todays day and age peole have more information than just hearing it straight form a politicos mouth what to to think. Look, if Plin really thinks her turning the first amendment right on its head by saying in one case her ATTACKS are non threatening and that if she is questioned or ATTACKed in the same fashion where is the logical disconnect that is not apparent to the us citizen. Its like saying, someone is a bully, you call them on it, and they go to the teacher to tell on you for calling them out on their behavior. Well i dont like bully’s. Bully’s arent much liked unless they are giving the lunch money to their smart, and evil best friend who uses them to extort, or otherwise muscle the opinions of the evil controller for them. Ok so Palin is not a bully, she is the Right wing pit bull, but who takes her serious when he has nothing to say. in fact neither does Mccain or his right leaning supporters anymore. Socialism, social democracy to be exact is what much of the Western world in the 21 century relys on. To say it doesn’t work means you must not have read about the world since the time of Mcarthyism. But good luck rumbling about making assanign comments till your red states all trun blue, because who is the 800 pound object in the room? Let me just say there is no room for attacks. look we need support form the Pakistani people to stem the flow of terrorists to Afgahn and iraqi territories, they just had a major earthquake, and Bush II goes in to strike and kill another 15 people. Why dont you tactically help the civilian, gain their trust and then you can better target those who stand out or otherwise hide as terrorists. Be smart people, think about what the first amendment stands for. maybe it protects Palins right to exaggerate or otherwise smear or libel Mr. Obama, then why does she evoke that in questioning these same claims they are attacking her right. its a two way street. Fair shake Fox nws asking of Mccain? well of course we cant all be mouthpieces for status quo. we cant all go around saying were traditionalists with a true agenda to control opinion and create nonsense news reports. Look if you were intelligent in the least bit you would all be willing try something different than what is presented as truth with no backing. Dont be scared to vote for what will preserve the nation of america. Cause if you dont, in 30 years you will find America has lost relevance to the world. Sure it could never happen right? Well its no threat, its just that things move faster now than the “straight talk express” there is no single red spectre to keep affixiated. There is the real needs of all humans to cooperate to fight for the evolution of reason. There your politcally driven mind sucking alaskan, that’s freedom of SPEECH!!!!! now your reply?

Posted by: health insurance quotes | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Again where are Sarah Palin Medical Records. She has had two months to get it together. It does not take that long

Posted by: TakingPictures | October 31, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Oh yes, where is Palin’s medical record?

Posted by: teddymaniac | October 31, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Sarah is right on! But, I think the threat is to ALL of us. The investigative powers of the state came down on Joe the Plumber because he dared to ask a question of a man wanting the keys of power of the most powerful nation on earth! That has had a chilling effect on anyone wanting to ask or say anything critical of Obama.
Notice what happens to reporters even if they support Obama, but they do something he doesn’t like. The NY, the bastion at the apex of liberal thinking to punished for a provocative cover. This is something the New Yorker has done for decades and is known for and its readership is exclusively liberal and progressive. This week three more reporters were booted from covering Obama because they endorsed McCain. This despite the fact that a recent study proves what many of us already knew three quarters of stories about Obama are praisful whereas three quarters of stories about McCain are negative! Sarah Palin has been picked over by armies of investigators, her family as well. It is amazing that she stays so strong. This is third world government stuff. But, maybe it is just Chicago’s way and a preview of what is to come. It is voter intimidation. Every single person here denigrating Sarah for pointing out the obvious is the stupid one. The question is: Do you want America to continue to be open, free and great? Where is the love for the idea that the American constitution is more important than some rogish corrupt politcian? we should all stand up for Joe the Plumber and Sarah not because we like them or agree with them, but because we want America to stand by what her the best in the world. A free country where kinds of expression thrives.

Posted by: Lola Cornwell | October 31, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

The pit bull with lipstick is the Republican Party’s “kiss of death”. Glad that we get to use our first admendment rights to tell her how we feel about her on Election Day.

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Palin fears the loss of her first amendment rights. Someone as ethically challenged as her would have no idea what first amendment rights means.

Posted by: Ronnn | October 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Who has nasty supporters. There have been 2 plots uncovered to assinate Mr Obama, and a McCain staffer cuts a backwards B in her face and blames, of course, a 200 pound black man. The rallys these 2 have resemble those of hate groups, essentially all white, angry and screaming un-American terms like kill him. Its funny they call Obama a socialist, but they seem like National Socialists.

Posted by: Who hates America? | October 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

She either read the first amendment and came up with the wrong meaning, or, worse, she didn’t read it and tried to use it to argue her case. How could any self respecting citizen promote this disgraceful candidate? She clearly lacks the mental capacities for the job at hand.

Posted by: champgrow | October 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I stopped listening the the beauty contestant weeks ago.
I hope that after nov 4 when ms palin has been banished back to alaska, maybe between depositions and hearings on her additional ethics violations, she can take the time to read The Constitution and the Bill of Rights. She’s just clueless.

Posted by: JB | October 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

If you gathered
Sarah Palin,
Paris Hilton and
Miss “such as” South Carolina
for a quiz and asked them how the government works Sarah Palin would lose. Paris & Miss South Carolina looks like friggin’ Einsteins in comparison.
Dont worry Sarah, maybe after the election and your ethics investigations you might just still have a job in Wasilla… i hear the ‘village idiot’ spot is vacant.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

What’s truelly scarey is, to some people she makes complete sense and is in no way a hypoctite.

Posted by: Makes Sense | October 31, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Obama is the least qualified candidate out of all four people in this election! Probably in the History of our country!! Seems all you need to be considered qualified to be President by stupid Democrats is to be able to give a speech and read a teleprompter!!
Palin is tons more qualified than Obama the Socialist!
From another lifelong Democrat for McCain/Palin!!

Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

The same media that gave Bush a free ride is giving Palin a hard time about being so negative. She has the right to be a witch and the press has the right to be a pain in the neck. Free speech goes both ways.

Posted by: Ronnn | October 31, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Whiners!!! Waw waw. I am so sick of cry baby republicans. They can sure dish it out, but when the wind blows their way, waw waw waw. This from someone who thinks the VP powers should be expanded; the VP is more powerful than the senate and is one of the dirtiest political campaigners in history. Palin is campaigning to ideologically blind people ,because if you really listen to her without the denial (she is a complete disaster), her remarks are very insulting because they are for people who can not think or research for them selves. I could never understand why liberals called extreme Republicans fascist until now; hate, prejudice, lies, war is good for the economy, censorship, and now she complains about a free media… Cheney in a dress!! Hillary 2012!

Posted by: Perspective | October 31, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Apparently, Palin is determined to talk about Obama’s associations.
She argues that his past acquaintances should be part of the conversation.
She argues that they speak volumes about his judgement.
Then – to be fair – what about her husband’s former links to an Alaskan separatist movement.
Yes, the links are likely tenuous…
…but if she insists that she wants to end her campaign by concentrating on Obama’s very loose associations – then perhaps a conversation about her and her husband’s links and ‘associations’ should be aired out too…
…links that the ‘liberal media’ has respectfully been silent about – perhaps because they felt it didn’t add anything to the campaign dialogue…
…ridiculous, eh?

Posted by: DAS | October 31, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

This is more palin-Mccain campaign than vice versa….someone just woke her up and asked to start talking…looks like she is running for president. being a VP candidate she is more in news than presidential candidate. The campaign should be about president and not VP. by the way, where is Biden all the time? why he is never in news like Palin? Looks like we already know next GOP nominee.. it will be fun to watch a race between Hillary and Palin in next presidential run.

Posted by: kathy | October 31, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Gov. Palin’s complaining about the media violating her First Amendment rights? Lord have mercy!
1) The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech from the U.S. GOVERNMENT, not the media or individuals. It would be nice if she, JUST ONCE, JUST ONE TIME took JUST A LOOK at our US Constitution.
2) Gov. Palin has voiced repeated viscious and unsupported personal attacks against Sen. Obama over the past two months. The nature of her speeches have caused many to turn away from her, NOT the media who reported it.
3) There is no First Ammendment guarantee that others will not use THEIR First Amendment rights to oppose Gov. Palin’s speeches. This is why most candidates THINK before they SPEAK, ESPECIALLY when they are not sure what they are talking about. It is better to be silent and thought a fool than open your mouth and prove it.
4) The media has called Gov. Palin on the nature of her comments. In other words, if Gov. Palin had not undertaken a hardline, untruthful fear/smear campaign, the media might not have had anything negative to talk about. People want to know more about dramatic claims. The media loves to expose a fraud. Thank God for that!
Perhaps Gov. Palin should spend some time actually STUDYING the office for which she is running. perhaps she should take the time to read the Constitution and some books on political thought. (Lord knows there will be a slew of them ghost-written for her.)

Posted by: RT | October 31, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Hahaha, Palin is not only a liar, demagoue and nitwit, but she is now a HUGE hypocrite as well.
She’s telling how the media is stifling her with their words about her, when she is doing the same thing with what she is saying–essentially, ‘media, stop talking bad about me!’
What a loser campaign with McCain/Palin. What is wrong with you people still supporting them? You’re running out of actual reasons, by reading these posts.

Posted by: RapidRon | October 31, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

“For the sake of our country. Please vote McCain. You will regret voting for a communist.” – Ted
Ted, you’re sn idiot.

Posted by: Ed | October 31, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Denise,
“Obama is the least qualified candidate out of all four people in this election! Probably in the History of our country!! Seems all you need to be considered qualified to be President by stupid Democrats is to be able to give a speech and read a teleprompter!!
Palin is tons more qualified than Obama the Socialist!
From another lifelong Democrat for McCain/Palin”
Who did you here this from, Sarah Palin? Obviously if you think she is telling the truth then you are not paying enough attention to the truth, you are just assuming Sarah can not tell a lie.
Too bad she lied right to your face like ten times and you are too dim to realize it.

Posted by: Tim | October 31, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Hilary girls will never go for Sarah Palin as she is dumb as a ROCK!!!

Posted by: blue two | October 31, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Palin has a right to bring up Obama’s associations, and the media has the right to label them negative.

Posted by: hyper | October 31, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Listen this whole thing is a joke both sides. Obama is not John Kennedy.
And McCain is not a man of honor nor a good politician. Sarah Palin has “forest gumped” her way through this and in the end reflects the poorly educated of our United States. What is more is this ” That is not our America” means Palins America is “White Power”. Look at Joe the Plumber.
However, as a democracy it is good that we all can have these discussions. Finally I think you are all red or blue just a bunch of babies.
Ha ha ha ha

Posted by: I am an American | October 31, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Here’s the ultimate solution to President McCain’s problems. He can appoint Vice President Palin to the Supreme Court, thus removing her from the Executive Branch line of fire, and, at the same time, adding a really innovative Constitutional thinker to the bench.
This will give her a second chance to read the Constitution since her last in-depth study of the subject in the 8th Grade.

Posted by: RHS | October 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

SARA YOU ARE RIGHT… You are a pitbull with lipstick,
now go fetch me the paper, you know the paper things with all those words on them.

Posted by: Squierghia74 | October 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

OMG!! This is so Orwellian. She says her freedom of speech is being threatened by someone else exercising their freedom of speech. I guess some animals are more equal than others, eh guv’ner? P.S. The first amendment is not about getting your feelings hurt or whether you agree with what someone says. Aside from obvious and already established exceptions (fire in a theatre, libel, etc. — SCOTUS been there done that) – she can say what she pleases (and has), and so can the media. She is one scary lady if she ever gets any real power. I see an airlift and boat rescue from Europe in our future (those of us not in Palin’s acceptable universe should she ever be in position to initiate Armageddon).

Posted by: pgc | October 31, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Yeah, except you’d actually need to do interviews to make that happen, you idgit. It’s nearly criminal for Palin to have received so little scrutiny before the election.

Posted by: plooger | October 31, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

This is yet more proof that Sarah Palin is unfit for office. First off, the 1st amendment applies to government action. The government can not implement policies or laws which curb free speech. There is nothing happening on this front AT ALL. Second off, free speech is a two way street. You get to speak your mind but others get to speak your mind about what you say. There is no problem here, this is a Diva whining that nobody is buying into her unfounded unproven assertions and that people are calling BS because it is BS. Free speech doesn’t mean anyone has to listen, least of all agree and that’s really what she’s whining about. “nobody is listening to my BS!”
Frankly, I don’t know why the Media doesn’t run story after story about Palin’s husband’s clear cut empirically proven association with a party that wants to remove a star from the stars and stripes. The republican whining about Palin and making every valid critcism of her lack of intelligence and incompetence out to be some kind of unfairness has caused the media to go way too soft on her. If Michelle Obama had been a member of a seperatist party and her husband had made video addresses to it for one of its conventions, we all know how much coverage that would get and how important the right wing media would think that was.

Posted by: Benjamin | October 31, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

I truly don’t understand why McCain chose her. I don’t think that she is a “moron” as some people are labeling her, but her lack of experience and lack of care about the environment in her home state made me seriously doubt McCain and his team’s decision making ability. They did not do the necessary homework and I agree with a lot of people that there are far more qualified women he could have chosen. I was ready to vote for McCain before he made his choice for a VP canidate that I could not support based on my beliefs and values. I respect McCain and his lifetime of public service and experience. I just can’t make sense of this choice.

Posted by: Jayworkingaway | October 31, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

From Barack Obama’s book, ‘Dreams Of My Father’:“The person who made me proudest of all, though, was [half brother ] Roy .. he converted to Islam” .
From Barack Obama’s book ‘Dreams of my Father’, “In Indonesia, i had spent two years at a Muslim school.”
“I studied the Koran.”
From Barack Obama’s book ‘Audacity of Hope’: “Lolo (Obama’s step father).. followed Islam…” “I looked to Lolo for guidance”.
From Barack Obama’s book ‘The Audacity Of Hope’, “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
From Barack Obama’s book ‘The Audacity Of Hope’, “We are no longer just a Christian nation. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.”
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

First, Palin’s remarks are not being suppressed–she is free to say what she wants. Second, the only retribution she receives for her remarks is an opinion on the negativity by a segment of the media. What is she suggesting, that the media should be censored? Doesn’t that implicate the media’s right to free speech. Isn’t this whole dispute part of the glory of free discourse and the exchange of ideas?

Posted by: Steven | October 31, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

God she is an idiot. How the heck did she ever become Governor. The first Amendent does not give you the right to distort the truth or lie. The RNC distortion campaign may of worked in Bush era, but today we do not have to reply on the conservative media for information. We can check the facts for ourselves on the net. Once a liar (i.e. Bush on WMD) always a liar.
You can’t scream Fire, Palin, when there is no fire. Get real and go back to Alaska and join the successionists party. We won’t mind if you succeed.

Posted by: steeve | October 31, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Oh brother.
A politician being criticized by the press is not oppression of free speech. That’s completely ridiculous.
It’s just wind and smoke to try and obscure reality, maybe an attempt to make the media back off (as if they don’t know that the First Amendment actually protects their right to criticize politicians).
This is all the McCain Palin campaign is. Idiotic untruthful remarks that play only to the extreme base and appear to the rest of us as the stupidities they are.
Don’t count Palin out, though. She’s an empty headed ambitious mouthpiece, but she’s attractive and knows how to give a speech. Others have risen very high on the ladder with lesser skills. Look at Bush!
Vote Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Ohbrother | October 31, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

So Sarah has it figured out, she only does interviews with press that vote HER way. Scary.

Posted by: csrainey | October 31, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Watch FOX new on election night if you want to see all these inbred republicans cry. Their idol gods, Hannity and OReilly will be bawling their eyes out when Obama captures the Electoral college BEFORE the total West Coast votes show a landslide. Remember, as long as all of us who are not retarded vote this will be reality. VOTE for the Landslide. Send McCain to his retirement home and Palin back to Alaska so she can “see” Russia some more, who knows their might be another fishing dispute to enhance her foreign policy credentials.

Posted by: Proud Liberal | October 31, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

This chick is a whack job for sure… politics is a tough business sweetheart… you say what you want and then the 4th Estate says what they want… you see: the lib media criticizes you and the right wing media bolsters you; that’s sort of how it works sweetie… you betcha… this woman’s lack of knowledge is stunning. It is a well known fact that broadcasting majors are the dumbest kids on campus. I should know, I was one of them.
Gerald Clough
http://www.savagerun.com

Posted by: gerald clough | October 31, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

While the mention of Ayers or any background is not inherently negative, the fact that it’s been covered at-length already by both Hillary AND the McCain campaign… yet they STILL try to hammer the association with terrorism… makes it negative campaigning. The McCain campaign continues to try and jam mistruths and issues that have already been put to rest down the voters’ throats. That, to me, is negative campaigning. Find a new issue or give up already.

Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

What??? I keep trying to give Ms. Plain the benefit of the doubt, and then she comes up with this!! I guess a persecution complex can do strange things to a person.

Posted by: Ted Williams | October 31, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

It’s not rocket science dear Sarah. If you attack the other guy like you’re doing, it’s negative. If you talk about the issues and what you plan on doing (which you don’t have a clue about) it’s positive. Also, no one is saying you can’t do it, they’re only commenting on your campaigning. They are, UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT allowed to do that.

Posted by: lwaa | October 31, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

I find it laughable that a McCain supporter who seems uninformed would say Palin is more qualified than Obama. To make that assessment one has to be informed themselves. Anyone calling Obama a socialist is expressing their ignorance of either the term or Obama’s policies.
The Economist magazine and The Financial Times have both endorsed Obama. Many newspapers that supported Bush in the past years support Obama this year. Many papers that support both McCain and Obama have questioned the suitability of Palin. None have questioned Obama.
It requires a certain level of ignorance to defend Palin’s competence for the job or a severe level of partisan bias that makes thing an impossibility.

Posted by: Ronnn | October 31, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

She is nothing more than a mean B***H, and she uses the fact she is a woman to get away with being one and not having to answer for her actions.
I find her unintelligent, scatterbrain, unable to speak in coherent sentences, unable to think on her feet, and hypocritical abotu pretty much everything she talks about.
Yes, she fits right in with the company she has chosen to be with.
The funny thing about the Tina Fey/ Palin impersonation is that Tina Fey is doing NOTHING that this mean lady doesn’t already do. It is not sexist, not mean spirited, it’s just a straight impersonation a sto what this woman really is like. Truth hurts some people.

Posted by: AW. | October 31, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

ANY WOMAN who can mention the Holocaust and be smiling at the same time is not someone who should even be considered as a VP candidate

Posted by: Squierghia74 | October 31, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

If you want to play the 6 degrees to a terrorist game, look no further than Bush – Bin Laden connection
or
Palin – Alaska Independent Party connection
Palin is a hypocrite.
You can’t scare the American people in to voting for 4 more years of failed economic policies.
How many American soliders have given their lives, not defending America, but fighting Bush’s “look at me now daddy” war.
Obama will Unify this country and make all 50 stars shine with glory.

Posted by: Republican-4Obama | October 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Title should be.
“Media fears McCain/Palin may win. Tries to hush information about Obamas’ association.”
Campaign is about how good the media is and silly Palin is.
Do you Americans get it.
Obama is so smart.

Posted by: wang chung | October 31, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

It is apparent Gov. Palin does not like being held accountable for what she says.

Posted by: msgijoe | October 31, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

What a sick joke! Palin is concerned about her 1st amendment rights? Her remarks are vague & incendiary in nature. Seems like she has borrowed a few “best practices” from a fascist’s perspective (belligerent nationalism). From her narrow perspective, one must live in a rural setting to be a true American. Can’t wait for her to go home to Alaska & shoot some more wolves!

Posted by: Rich | October 31, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

For people that pride themselves on being so smart, you got to be dumb if you don’t understand what she is saying.
The media turned the legit question into a personal attack. Therefore making it seem less important then it should be. Obama has had ties to some of the worst people in this county. Don’t you Obama supporters what to know why?
The problem with this county is no one wants to work anymore. Obama promises to give give give and you all fall in behind him. But just remember, if you try to take from the rich, they are just going to take it from the poor. Wake up people.

Posted by: GOTIT | October 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Our freedom of speech does not trump our freedom to not listen to this female’s drivel.
The pursuit of happiness includes ignoring stupid speech, no matter who spouts it.

Posted by: Big D | October 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

After 20-30 years an american born person who is hanging out with Osama Bin Laden – sitting in his audience – hanging out with him for decades – if contest an election. And if he is as smooth talker as Obama is – without experience – with all academic knowledge to win the debates -
Would you vote for that guy ?
Posted by: nim
==================================
The right wing voted in Bush twice… He was best of friends with the Bin Laden’s. He even flew his family out of America on private jets after the 9-11 attacks. This is common knowledge and easily verifiable.

Posted by: Creamsykle | October 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Friday, October 31 obviously there will be no release of medical records, no press conferences, no knowledge of the modern world i.e. fruit flies, global warming etc. I really do not understand how anyone could support this woman. Granted most politicians are not completely truthful, but they cannot be, we wouldn’t allow it. Can you imagine the voting public electing someone who is totally truthful, its not going to happen. But to be so dishonest and ignorant is beyond reproach.
Now she states somehow her rights are being violated by the press reporting on what she says. I am starting to understand how dictators minds work, thank you Sarah. I could never understand how someone would want to control multitudes of people. Ignorance explains it.

Posted by: Srethng | October 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

DURING the VP debate… Sara (Spreading the lies and the hate & the Fear like a good little republican) while trying to say a vote for Obama is a vote for terrorism and another holocaust, was smiling while she said it….
ANY WOMAN who can mention the Holocaust and be smiling at the same time is not someone who should even be considered as a VP candidate

Posted by: Squierghia74 | October 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Why does Palin insist on publicly displaying her lack of understanding for the Constitution? First it was was the vice president’s role where she repeatedly ignores 230 yrs of precident for seperation of powers. Now, suggesting that media criticism somehow curtails her free speech, even though she continues to freely speak her message to millions over the airwaves.
I have to agree that the McCain ticket does nothing for women voters, since they clearly chose beauty over brains on this one.

Posted by: DavieP | October 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Boohoo Palin. She’s an idiot and was a cynical attempt to appeal to the middle class. But it says it all – the Republicans think the middle/working class are idiots. She does not appeal to this woman, in fact, in my part of the world we call people like her white trash, bimbettes and a lot of other nasty names, but they bring it on themselves by thinking that clothes and makeup are substance – and she had to “borrow” hers.
BTW, unless you have established FACTs – that Obama was engaged in some sort of terrorist action, it is just NEGATIVE attacks because they have no substance, just like Palin.

Posted by: Beyond SICK of Palin | October 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Wow, a whole article summarizing BS from conservative talk radio? I would think the right-wing media machine would be getting a little tired by this point in the race and give it a break… but I guess not.
Now that you all can see I’m a rabid Liberal, and damn proud of it, my comment on the article:
Nobody is restricting your first amendment rights, Ms. Palin. You’re just being called out on they fool you are for the idiotic things you say. Maybe if you could make any relevant, intelligent comment about economics, domestic, or foreign policy, you could talk a little more about policy instead of bringing up the same tired relationships of President Obama’s past that nobody but other insane right wingers care about.
Thats right… I said PRESIDENT Obama. Get used to it, righties.

Posted by: ann-D | October 31, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

“Where is the love for the idea that the American constitution is more important than some rogish corrupt politcian?”
1. Palin doesn’t know squat about the Constitution. She still doesn’t know about the duties and powers of the Vice President.
2. Your use of “praisful” and various misspellings reflect a backwoods “charm” of an outhouse redneck that looks upon Joe the Plumber as Royalty.
3. But I really have to agree with the bad taste one gets from reports of reporters being thrown off the plane for endorsing John McCain. Obama’s promise of being honest with us shouldn’t be because you don’t agree with him gives him the right to censure their job of being honest. Had McCain not chosen the Pit Bull from Hell, I would have voted for him. Daisy Mae, Bush advisers and Robocalls is not only un-Presidential, but brings fear to what the McCain government would do to me if I am late paying my taxes.

Posted by: Tom | October 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Oh geesh, this woman is dumber than I thought. Her First Amendment rights are being violated? Give me a break. I don’t remember there being anything in the Constitution about protecting her ego. If she can’t handle the pressure then she needs to get out NOW.
Let’s see, she doesn’t know what the Vice President does, she thinks she has foreign policy experience because Alaska is in close physical proximity to Russia and she thinks her comments should be free from scrutiny.
Not ready for prime time, that’s for sure.

Posted by: A2 | October 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Governor Palin does not know:
1. Basic Constitutional law, in that the First Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with others, including the press, criticizing her political positions.
2. Basic government, in that she thought the duties of the Vice President was to manage the senate
3. Basic biology, in that she thought that medical research with fruit flies was an extension of left-wing ideology
4. Basic geography, thinking that she could see Russia from her front porch.
5. Basic intelligence, which is why she is dragging down the McCain ticket.

Posted by: Alpinist | October 31, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

The news has the right to free speech too. they can report (or not report) whatever they wish.
Besides, if they had truly been doing their job, like many conservatives seem to suggest they aren’t, they would’ve brought up McCain’s unapologetic ‘unrepentant’ gook gaffe in 2000. Especially after the “that one” comment, when everyone was so sure he couldn’t at all be prejudiced – my ass. If he can point to associations with Wright, then his own slurred past should be in question too. Hypocrite.

Posted by: Cru | October 31, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

.
We have this man named Obama,
Who some have called Osama.
But if he should lose,
His supporters it’ll bruise
And they can run home to their momma.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Don’t worry, folks. After Tuesday she’ll be back to shooting moose from helicopters.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 31, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Could you define whom you consider to be the Worst people in America.
A professor and leader in education who decades ago, protested a highly questionable war (police acion) with his own questionable, but not horrific, tactics.
A preacher whom the right wing media has taken 17 seconds of 40 someodd years of sermons and made into some kind of monster.
Who are you talking about Rich.
McCain gave money to the same professor at Columbia that Obama is accused of attending a dinner for.
Hypocrite Palin spoke at a convention for a group that wants to rip the 50th star off from our flag.

Posted by: Response to Rich | October 31, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Palin promise to release medical records this week!!!’
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
That child is not hers!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Hey Tim,
Why not give us one thing Obama has done?? Even one and please don’t use the useless diatribe about Nuclear Proliferation! He jumped on as a cosponsor! Oh yea, that’s right, Obama says he has more experience because he has run his campaign for 2 years!
See this article where Obama actually has the nerve to say this bull!
http://tinyurl.com/6gaveh
At least Palin has run a state and a city!
You Obama fans are just as as dumb as Obama knew you would be! That’s why he knew he could run for Pres with zero experience!
Too bad Obama has lied to YOU for two years and you are much too DIM to realize it!
**************************************
Denise,
“Obama is the least qualified candidate out of all four people in this election! Probably in the History of our country!! Seems all you need to be considered qualified to be President by stupid Democrats is to be able to give a speech and read a teleprompter!!
Palin is tons more qualified than Obama the Socialist!
From another lifelong Democrat for McCain/Palin”
Who did you here this from, Sarah Palin? Obviously if you think she is telling the truth then you are not paying enough attention to the truth, you are just assuming Sarah can not tell a lie.
Too bad she lied right to your face like ten times and you are too dim to realize it.

Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Two major points for Ms. Palin
1) A negative attack can be true, but still be negative. A positive argument is one you make to promote yourself. A negative argument is one you make against your opponent. How do you not understand this subtlety? Whether or not the content is “negative” is subjective, and irrelevant. You have been doing nothing but negative campaigning since you first appeared and to argue other wise is mind-bending sophestry.
2) You have a complete lack of any understanding about constitutional law, which is fine for ordinary citizens untrained in the law, but terrifying considering how often you invoke it and because of the office that you seek. The Constitution establishes and limits our govnerment. The first amendment is meant to protect citizens from the intrusion of government into our right to free speech. It does not apply to individuals (except in very limited circumstances).
Palin, you are shameless. You have zero humility. You either don’t know what you don’t know, or you don’t care. This insults me (a lawyer) who takes all of this very seriously, because you clearly do not take this seriously.
Finally, you are a public figure running for office. The tort liability the for libel that the media faces for negative reports on you must meet a much lower level of scrutiny than that for ordinary citizens. Learn some f@#$%ing law if you plan to be executing them!

Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“She is nothing more than a mean B***H”
Aw now…. disgruntled you can’t even get close…?
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

There was a Gov. named Palin
whose act sure is a-failin’
her dumb-ness is stunning,
from her we’re a-running
while John M is sure to be wailin’

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 31, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Palin believes in censorship…she’s upset because she hasn’t been able to censor the media…or the public…as they voice their genuine concerns about her abilities (none). The firing of the librarian who would not remove books that Palin wished removed really happened. Palin was forced to back down and reinstate the librarian or face recall. She has a lot of nerve saying her First Amendment rights are being threatened. Her glass house already has far too many cracks in it. http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/what_about_that_anne_kilkenny_e-mail.html

Posted by: bobbleheadalert | October 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I have always been an advocate of debate. I feel it is an important forum for the exchange of information and ideas. Whether you are an Obama proponent or one for McCain is immaterial what is germane what is important is the free flow of information which a good healthy debate brings about. It is for this reason which I find the current level of discourse so appalling. By denigrating the debate to the level of personal attacks upon fellow debaters it only cheapens the process and acts to stifle the debate. With some much animosity and acrimony in our society today what we need more of is civility and less personal attacks to aid the flow of information. The personal attacks only act to halt the debate not propel it. My question to both sides is what are you afraid of?

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

“At least, in my own opinion, John McCain is a true American who will never compromise the values and security of our great nation.”
Salisbury, he already has by voting with George Bush 90% of the time, by his OWN admission.

Posted by: Tina | October 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

For people that pride themselves on being so smart, you got to be dumb if you don’t understand what she is saying.
The media turned the legit question into a personal attack. Therefore making it seem less important then it should be. Obama has had ties to some of the worst people in this county. Don’t you Obama supporters what to know why?
The problem with this county is no one wants to work anymore. Obama promises to give give give and you all fall in behind him. But just remember, if you try to take from the rich, they are just going to take it from the poor. Wake up people.
========================================
So then, smart-ass, your plan is to sit on your hands? Everyone wants to work, the problem is being fairly compensated for it.
As far as it being made into an “attack”, it is. It’s being overplayed, and if you don’t realize that that’s why Palin’s approval rating is plummeted, then you’re clearly not one of those ‘smart people’ for which you hold so much disdain.

Posted by: :| | October 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Not many Republicans read this drivel judging by the number of asinine comments being posted

Posted by: James Carvel | October 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

McCain and Liddy
McCain and Liddy
go together they’re a pair quite giddy
This I’ll tell you, brother
You can’t have one without the other
McCain and Liddy
McCain and Liddy
dollars flowing and it sure ain’t pretty
Gordon you know’s a felon
Johnnie knows but he ain’t tellin’

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 31, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I used to think Obama supporters were just delusional. After reading some of the comments here from them, I must admit I was wrong. They barely have two brain cells to rub together.
Y’all need to step away from the crack pipes, joints or whatever the heck it is that’s killing off your gray matter. You’re not doing yourselves or this country any favors.

Posted by: Jason | October 31, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

But Sarah!!!
From Sean Cockerham in Anchorage –
Sarah Palin’s call on Ted Stevens to step down has raised the question:
Who is Palin supporting in the Senate race? Democrat Mark Begich?
The Republican vice presidential nominee won’t say. Here’s what Palin told a Toledo, Ohio, television reporter during an interview yesterday.
“I have asked for him to resign also and even if he’s elected on Tuesday and even after that because that allows for a special election in Alaska. It will allow Alaska a real clear choice. I’ve never told people who I voted for before because I see that as a very precious freedom in our country; free and fair elections that allow us to cast a secret ballot behind the voting booth curtain. So that’s the way I want to keep it.”
A reader correctly points out that Palin actually does sometimes tell people how she’ll vote.
Palin told reporters she’d vote no in the August primary election on Ballot Measure 4 (which sought to limit mining discharges into streams). The measure failed, and its proponents said Palin was one of the big reasons why.
Palin also endorsed her lieutenant governor, Sean Parnell, in his unsuccessful challenge of Congressman Don Young in the primary.

Posted by: Rodger | October 31, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Doesn’t she know that the 1st Amendment allows for people, and that includes the press, to express opinions? Otherwise, that’s censorship, which I think she knows all about from her days as Mayor.
Don’t be fooled! She’s trying to take away freedom of thought! Obama/Biden!

Posted by: Josh | October 31, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

“I used to think Obama supporters were just delusional. After reading some of the comments here from them, I must admit I was wrong. They barely have two brain cells to rub together.
Y’all need to step away from the crack pipes, joints or whatever the heck it is that’s killing off your gray matter. You’re not doing yourselves or this country any favors.”
=======================================
Nothing in particular eh? just a sass mouth? Pretty much sums up what I thought of your side too.

Posted by: :| | October 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

you better get ready for it obama with both the houses in washington behind him will change our what obama calls our negitive paper our constitution and when that is gone youll look back and remember that you once had a right to post something here no matter how stupid it was

Posted by: knot4u | October 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Salisbury; you work for John McCain and you have never been or ever will be anything but a republican. How can you write this stuff, “We lost the chance of a democratic presidency when the idiots put Sen. Hillary Clinton out of the race. Too bad!”

Posted by: Srethng | October 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

KMB,
Yes. you obamabots now realize Jews are voting heavily for Mccain and are trying to stir the pot.

Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Hey Jason,
Don’t think for a minute that the Obama supporters plan to step away from the crack pipes, joints, etc.,
They are dreaming of how much more they can buy when Obama sends them their newest welfare checks funded by hard working Americans!! Mr Socialist Redistributer!
From a Proud Lifelong Democrat who will never fall for the false lies of Obama!

Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Kids in junior high have a better understanding of our basic rights under the Constitution than Palin does.

Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

The will be a run on kool-aid next Wednesday.

Posted by: geevill | October 31, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Public comments made by Alaskans and those that have worked with her is that anyone against her is considered a ‘hater’ and fired or defamed … as in the librarian and the book banning debacle. Yes, I would say some are reacting to the far right Christian agenda among the note-able disconnects we’ve seen during the campaign. A child would understand the double standard she is suggesting here.

Posted by: Akamai | October 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

i fear for my county i fear not only for obamas track reckord in the senate but for the track marks on obamas arms

Posted by: knot4u | October 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

What does the triumvirate of Obama-Pelosi-Reid offer?
Rep. Barney Frank is calling for new tax hikes on the most successful and a 25 percent across-the-board slash in national defense. Sen. John Kerry is talking up new and massive federal spending, a la FDR’s New Deal. Specifically, we can expect:
• Swift amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens and a drive to make them citizens and register them, as in the Bill Clinton years. This will mean that Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona will soon move out of reach for GOP presidential candidates, as has California.
• Border security will go on the back burner, and America will have a virtual open border with a Mexico of 110 million.
• Taxes will be raised on the top 5 percent of wage-earners, who now carry 60 percent of the U.S. income tax burden, and tens of millions of checks will be sent out to the 40 percent of wage-earners who pay no federal income tax. Like the man said, redistribute the wealth, spread it around.
• Social Security taxes will be raised on the most successful among us, and capital gains taxes will be raised from 15 percent to 20 percent. The Bush tax cuts will be repealed, and death taxes reimposed.
• Two or three more liberal activists of the Ruth Bader Ginsberg-John Paul Stevens stripe will be named to the Supreme Court. U.S. district and appellate courts will be stacked with “progressives.”
• Special protections for homosexuals will be written into all civil rights laws, and gays and lesbians in the military will be invited to come out of the closet. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” will be dead.
• The homosexual marriages that state judges have forced California, Massachusetts and Connecticut to recognize, an Obama Congress or Obama court will require all 50 states to recognize.
• A Freedom of Choice Act nullifying all state restrictions on abortions will be enacted. America will become the most pro-abortion nation on Earth.
• Affirmative action — hiring and promotions based on race, sex and sexual orientation until specified quotas are reached — will be rigorously enforced throughout the U.S. government and private sector.
• Universal health insurance will be enacted, covering legal and illegal immigrants, providing another powerful magnet for the world to come to America, if necessary by breaching her borders.
• A federal bailout of states and municipalities to keep state and local governments spending up could come in December or early next year.
• The first trillion-dollar deficit will be run in the first year of an Obama presidency. It will be the first of many.
Welcome to Obamaland!

Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Palin is now channeling Tina Fey.
No comedy writer could possibly come up with the whacko stuff that Palin says.
I’ll miss her humorous ignorance once she slinks back to Alaska.

Posted by: Continuum | October 31, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Sarah Palin is the perfect example of why abortion should be legal: Imagine how much better off the world would’ve been if she had been aborted!

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Sarah Palin doesn’t even understand that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting the press, not the press from criticizing the government. People, she doesn’t understand the U.S. Constitution. She is profoundly unqualified to hold national office.

Posted by: MJA | October 31, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????
WHERE IS PALIN’S MEDICAL RECORDS????????

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 31, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Palin’s fantasy world is where the First Amendment only exists for those who agree with her.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | October 31, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

bill and hill are you out there i am a demorcrat i was proud for you even when you lost to obama eary this summer but now i am ashamed for you for throwing in with obama. that never put county first that just shows youre more party first, i may vote democratic again but not you.

Posted by: knot4u | October 31, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Kinda rich coming from somebody who was this close to banning books in Wasilla.
Visions of jackboots dance in my head.

Posted by: rogerthomas | October 31, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Palin is from Alaska, not Mars. But you wouldn’t know it from some of her wacko commentary. Thankfully there will be video tape of Palin for the next election cycle, spewing her nonsense. Her career as a national political candidate is over. There aren’t enough low information voters for someone like her to get elected.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | October 31, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

She sees Free Speech as meaning she can say anything she wants, whether true or not, whereas it’s unfair for others to level legitimate criticism at her. That’s been her political m.m.– (although not unique to her)— she uses people and then pushes them aside or worse when she doesn’t need them any more. I think she would do the same thing to the public at large, as this is typical behavior for a demagogue.

Posted by: bhciapol | October 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Palin knows that conversations with hot-talk radio hosts will make their way into the main stream media eventually. She doesn’t seem to care that her ignorance of the Constitution is showing through the veneer of her paper thin political personality. How odd.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | October 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Uh, so Palin says reporters are threatening her 1st amendment rights by attacking her for attacking Obama…uh huh.
So, it sounds to me, if I understand this correctly(?), Sarah is threatening reporters 1st amendment rights for attacking her for attacking Obama.
Get it, got it…good!

Posted by: Sandy in Texas | October 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Palin must be preparing herself for a career on Fox News. Except the blonde woman from The View is 5 times better.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | October 31, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I don’t understand her point of view. It’s only in her opinion that her positions on Sen. Obama are viewed by the media as negative attacks, but she hasn’t been silenced by making those attacks. How can her First Amendment rights be violated? She still exercised her right to make those claims about Obama. It’s just that those claims are tired, old, hackneyed ones that don’t mean much of anything, especially in this late stage of the game.

Posted by: em | October 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

The “Me First” campaign at its finest.

Posted by: former GOPer | October 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

So … Palin is saying her opinion is the only one that matters? If someone disagrees with her, somehow her rights are infringed upon … give me a break, what a bozo.
You have to agree this woman is not worthy of holding ANY public office. Oh, sorry … am I disagreeing with you? … sorry! Use your brain once in a while girl!!!
Vote for Obama/Biden .. the smart choice.

Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

I wish Palin would pursue this because like all the rest of their negative campaigning, it would also backfire in her face. Todd Palin being a “low key” member of Alaskan Independent Party, whose founder has made very hateful and very Un-Amercan statements as they wish to secede from these United States. Although Sarah is not member, the AIP endorsed her in 2006 when she ran for governor. Also…Big fans of Palin is the Constitution Party, a far right party wants to basically interpret the Constitution…biblically, (Yea, that’s what we need,,,I don’t think so…)

Posted by: braith | October 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Boy is she dumb.

Posted by: Victor | October 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

So she gets freedom of speech but we don’t?
What a bitch.

Posted by: Billy | October 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

This woman has got to be the dullest knife in the drawer.

Posted by: informed voter | October 31, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Wow,
I am completely glad I have removed all previous association from the Republican Party. You guys are a bunch of barely literal, mentally unstable, imbeciles.
It astounds me the difference in posts. The “For Obama” people are providing sound logical reasons while the “For McCain” people just make up some of the most bizarre stuff. Is it me or does the Republican party only attract the absolute bottom of the proverbial bucket when it comes to intelligence and foresight?
Well I hope this anti-knowledge, anti-education, anti-science, anti-brain Republican platform dies this year.

Posted by: timL | October 31, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

I want to see those medical records now. Its insultin ghow this woman treats the media when we just want to know the truth about her. and all those who say obama didnt he did it wasnt as detailed but the guy plays basketball everyday and doesnt have an inch of fat on him how unhealthy could he be. what is she hiding. that kid isnt hers i know it. more lies. nice vetting job mccain ahaha.

Posted by: brian | October 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

If puck head wants to discuss rights being taken away, she might want to walk on over to the White House and speak to her current president. GWB.

Posted by: Mary L | October 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

.
Now Biden’s first name is Joe
Hot air he’s been known to blow.
Tough questions he was asked
And he was taken to task
’cause he answered the questions like a Schmo.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

I really have no idea what Palin is saying. it’s one thing to be plain spoken, but i swear, she just makes no sense whatsoever. She can go negative all day long — no one is stopping her. But, when she chooses the path to crazyville, we are allowed to call her on it, and when she lies, the press has an obligation to call her on it. and when she shows her ignorance time and time again, we should not ignore it.

Posted by: flvoter | October 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

palin’s understanding of the 1′st amendment is stunning. To expect that she can attack her opponent without being critized shows no insight whatsoever. the 1st amendment protects her from government censorship and it protects the media and others who criticize her for what they believe are her unfair attacks.

Posted by: fblaze | October 31, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Bless her heart.

Posted by: MoVoice | October 31, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Someone point out to me where/how calling Palin’s negative attacks what they are “threatens” her rights!?!? Is the media somehow trying to make a law to prevent her from speaking? All they are doing is calling it like they see it.
She is a psycho! Someone needs to sit her down and explain what these amendments mean.
And you republicans thinks she qualified to be vice president!?!? She is the future of your party???
Yeah, good luck with that!

Posted by: Greg in MN | October 31, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Last time I checked, the First Amendment was, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
It protects Ms. Palin’s freedom of speech, but it also protcts the FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. How can I elect someone to support and defend the Constitution when they clearly have no idea what the document actually says?

Posted by: An Independent | October 31, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Leave it to professor palin, civics instructor extraordinaire to utterly fail to undderstand the actual words of the Constitution>
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petitionthe Government for a redress of grievances.

Posted by: Paul Dirks | October 31, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I hope that the rightwing nutjob neocon wingbat kool aid drinkers choose Sarah Palin as their candidate in whatever election.
This human pile of ignorance will go down in flames. It would make McCains drubbing look mild in comparison.
Palin was McCain’s gift to the Democrats. She’s a gift that keeps on giving.

Posted by: Continuum | October 31, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

She should release her medical records right after Obama releases his! So far, all The One has given us is a doctor’s note saying he is healthy.
Medical records for a sexually active woman of childbearing years is going to include contraception. This is likely why she is hesitant to release. She doesn’t need a front-page story in the Times dissecting her choice of birth control.

Posted by: Dennis from the Bronx | October 31, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

and by the way, can palin/mccain please stop with the socialist line? really? has anyone ever heard of progessive tax system? what this country has had for a very long time? you know — the more you make, the more you pay — the wealth is then “redistributed”. the fact that people buy this line is CRAZY to me; especially when those people are exactly the ones who get the benefit from it. Three percent of families make more than $250k/year; arguably, the palin rally attendees by and large are not in that 3%. so, can we please, please, cut the Marxist/socialist comments? please? it hurts my brain!

Posted by: flvoter | October 31, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

.
Hey you knuckle-draggers, calling someone out on their associations with questionable characters is *not* negative. It is fair for eithet party to do so, and the other party has a responsibility to be forthcoming in sufficient detail to correctly describe the relationship. Obama has been evasive and contradicted himself on this.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

OMG, this woman is so dumb, she needs to be on the Hills. Or maybe she needs to get her own show “The Sarah Palin Comedy Hour”. Throw in Joe the plumber and some of the other morons (O’Reilly, Hannity, etc.)and just let them talk.

Posted by: Chandu | October 31, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Let see she put her self thru school, had a small business, worked her way from small town goverment up to Gov. of Alaska with a 11 billion dollar budget which she cut. While no one even knows how Obama could pay his way thru Colubia then after making $12 an hour can afford to go to Harvard and as senator making about $65,000 a year gets help from a convited felon so he can buy his 2 milion dollar house. Someone needs to vet this guy, any other election a guy like this would not get out of the Iowa primary with a 5 place finnish.

Posted by: matt | October 31, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Huh?
Her First Amendment Rights are threatened because what people say about her?
Really?
Did those comments prevent her from giving the interview? Did those comments prevent abcnews.com from reporting that interview? Did those comments keep reporters away from her latest campaign appearance.
A Republican said it best the other day: The woman is simply a “whackjob.”

Posted by: Alex | October 31, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Boy do these comments show how dumb Sarah Palin is! The press isn’t abridging her free speech, merely exercising theirs. If anyone can be accused of abridging free speech, Sarah Palin could by trying to ban books from the town of Wasilla when she was mayor and tried to force the town librarian to pull books off the shelf.

Posted by: nhmtnbkr | October 31, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Let see she put her self thru school, had a small business, worked her way from small town goverment up to Gov. of Alaska with a 11 billion dollar budget which she cut. While no one even knows how Obama could pay his way thru Colubia then after making $12 an hour can afford to go to Harvard and as senator making about $65,000 a year gets help from a convited felon so he can buy his 2 milion dollar house. Someone needs to vet this guy, any other election a guy like this would not get out of the Iowa primary with a 5 place finnish.

Posted by: matt | October 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

WOW!?!? This woman really doesn’t know anything about the constitution, does she… It is scary to think she has the potential of appointing supreme court candidates.
She doesn’t understand the job of the vice president…
She doens’t understand the 1st amendment…
she is not even qualified to be a 5th grade civics teacher much less VP or president.

Posted by: dingo | October 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Matt, no one is saying Palin is a bad politician. But, come on, she’s not smart. She really has difficulty putting a coherent sentence together. haven’t we had enough of that strategory with George W? I’m tired of stupid people running the country. I’m ready for some smart people to take the reins and see what they can do. i look for a leader who is smarter than I am; I’m sure I’m a lot smarter than Palin. I worked 30 hours per week through college, had an academic scholarship, went to law school, graduated, practice law, have 2 kids, look good, and guess what? i’m not qualified to be vp. but, i’m more qualified than Palin.

Posted by: flvoter | October 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

As Salon reported, “So dumb it hurts.” Poetic justice if her antics were SEEN as the final nail in McCain’s coffin

Posted by: Libratine | October 31, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

This woman is as dumb as a box of rocks!

Posted by: Rick | October 31, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

ignore my last comment. i forgot — sarah palin is qualified to be vp — she can see russia from her house! you betcha!

Posted by: flvoter | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

WOW!?!? This woman really doesn’t know anything about the constitution, does she… It is scary to think she has the potential of appointing supreme court candidates.
She doesn’t understand the job of the vice president…
She doens’t understand the 1st amendment…
she is not even qualified to be a 5th grade civics teacher much less VP or president.

Posted by: dingo | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

WOW!?!? This woman really doesn’t know anything about the constitution, does she… It is scary to think she has the potential of appointing supreme court candidates.
She doesn’t understand the job of the vice president…
She doens’t understand the 1st amendment…
she is not even qualified to be a 5th grade civics teacher much less VP or president.

Posted by: dingo | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Too funny that is not what the first amendment says. It actually protects the media’s right to criticize her.

Posted by: Teri | October 31, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Read that amendment again, folks. “The media” cannot violate your free speech. The amendment prohibits CONGRESS from doing so.
Governor Palin is suggesting the same old repugnant suffering mentality we’ve heard for years: that it’s unfair when the repugnant GOP is being criticized. Except she goes the extra mile to say that criticism (which is protected by the 1st amendment) is actually the same as violation; that criticism is Unconstitutional. This is malarky. This is embarrassing. Vote Tuesday and end this madness.

Posted by: Jon | October 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Silly Sarah Palin of the G.O.P.
“I can attack you but don’t criticize me!”
Man, this woman–I’d swear that she’s insane,
But that can’t be the answer since she clearly has no brain.

Posted by: Vincent | October 31, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I think she’s right – she can say what she wants – the Media sure as hell does! Watch 20-20 tonight!

Posted by: Jill | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

The problem isn’t that the charges were “negative,” it’s that they were scurrilous and factually wrong.
If Sarah were witty enough she’d be telling this joke:
“I said ‘Obama pals with terrorists,’ and the guy from the elite media said, ‘Ooh, you’re being negative.’ So I told him, ‘Okay, I’m positive Obama pals with terrorists!” Ba-dum-bum!

Posted by: David | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

This is an very important view into Palin’s psychology. She sees the 1st Admentment as protecting HER right to free speech and HER right to be protected from others free Speech. It must be Halloween because I just got the fright of my life.

Posted by: muffler | October 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

If she does ask reporters who they’re voting for, as she considers at the end of this article, she will be contradicting her own praise earlier this week of the secret ballot.
I am so sick of this victimized attitude from the ruling party.

Posted by: me | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

That’s it. The Disasta from Alaska has spoken for the final time as far as I’m concerned. I can no longer listen to the ignorance that spills out of this woman’s mouth.
My gosh, the media is now inteferring with her first amendment rights. It’s time to send her packing back from whence she came. And the sooner the better.

Posted by: Leigh | October 31, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Instead of spending $11,000 a week on make up, they should have given Huey Long in Drag a weekend tutorial on the U.S. Constitution.
Does she really believe that she’s free to criticize Obama but enjoys some sort of immunity from criticism herself?

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Please, would everyone send me your posts so that I can review them? Once I have massaged your message to fit my feelings I’ll be sure to post what you really meant…
Think about it, she is concerned about the media being the tinted screen between her and the voters. They (media) have direct control about how things are reported.

Posted by: mirgc | October 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

This woman is in outer space and has no concept of either our constitution or what first amendment rights are all about. If any informed intelligent person had any question at all about whether she is qualified or capable of being in office, anywhere, this should seal it and answer their question. This womans mistaken view of the constitution is totally scary and dangerous. Would she censor the media so that only her viewpoint is put out. The reality is McCain Palin have run the most negative, dishonest campaign I have ever observed going all the way back to JFK v Nixon.

Posted by: John | October 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Failin Palin is Crazy Michelle Bachmann on steroids.

Posted by: cosmosis | October 31, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

ABCNEWS took her out of context in the vargas interview.
She was talking about 2008 and ABCNEWS made it about 2012.
ABCNEWS totally made up the story.

Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

First of all……bad lip job:) Having made that petty remark, this woman doesn’t seem to realize that she and her running mate have been protected, by the media, from having endless stories told. If she thinks she’s frustrated by the press, she should walk in the shoes of Obama supporters! Because Obama takes the high road, his campaign has not pressed anyone to make sure the public sees the darker side of McCain and Palin. So stop your whining for goodness sakes Sarah!

Posted by: barbara miller | October 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Obama kicks off papers that don’t endorse him from his plane.
Washington Times, New York Post, Dallas Morning News kicked off the plane.
How is that for first amendment rights.

Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I’m sure she’s a strict constructionist, because you can read what she said right here in the 1st ammendment. NOT!
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Posted by: MikeBoyScout | October 31, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Of course Palin’s comments about Obama are “negative”. Any time you talk about why your opponent SHOULD NOT be elected, as opposed to why you SHOULD be elected, it is “negative”.
And there is nothing wrong with that. There is nothing wrong with Palin or McCain questioning Obama’s experience, judgment or policy proposals — or for Obama to question theirs, as he has done. In both cases it’s “negative” and in both cases it is legitimate.
What’s wrong, and not legitimate, is when Palin and McCain attack Obama with vicious, sleazy, despicable, deliberate lies — which, so far, is all they’ve put forward.
In any other context than a political campaign, Obama would likely have an open-and-shut legal case for slander and defamation against Palin and McCain. And indeed, some of the other individuals that Palin and McCain have recently attacked with deliberate vicious lies in the course of their dishonest attacks on Obama may well be legally entitled to sue Palin and McCain for slander and defamation.

Posted by: SecularAnimist | October 31, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

McCain came out for a shield for reporters.
McCain supports the press first amendment rights.
This election should be about the top of the ticket.
Enough Pelosi could be president as well.
Can we for once in this election focus on the top of the ticket.
Worst covered election ever.

Posted by: Jeff | October 31, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Palin talking about her First Amendment rights? I seriously doubt she could point to right of free speech in the Constitution.

Posted by: Cyril | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Sarah Palin is a walking train wreck. Her nomination was the beginning of the end for the McCain campaign. She deserves all of the negative attention she gets, from the media, the public, her own peers – because she happily accepted the nomination and brought this on herself. Let’s look at a few facts about Palin:
- Couldn’t name ONE magazine or publication she has read to keep her informed of world events
- Gave a completely wrong and hilarious definition of what the powers of the VP are – twice
- Could not give ONE example to Katie Couric of John McCain fighting against Wall Street corruption
- An impartial investigative body found her to have abused her power as Governor of Alaska in the Troopergate scandal
- Her husband was an active member of a secessionist party that regularly defaced the wonderful USA she claims to love
- She openly declared there is a “real America” – of course meaning, the conservative, God-fearing Americans, not the evil, Hollywood leftists who secretly hate this country and worship Satan
- She spent more money on her wardrobe than most families make in a year – while at the same time trying to appeal to these same families
- She has consistently refused to speak to the press, with McCain going so far as to make the condition of her press conferences to “be nice to her”
- Her off-the-cuff speech ability is nearly as poor as Bush’s, and her body language (winks, head tilts, small town euphamisms) is neither professional or presidential
- She thinks dinosaurs and humans co-existed 6000 years ago. LOL, just LOL
- She won’t say it on public television, but she believes homosexuality is a choice, and if people “stay gay,” they do not deserve state and federal rights given to straights
- She has consistently fostered an atmosphere of fear and paranoia about Barack Obama, while offering no substantive ideas of her own
- When pressed on specifics about McCain’s track record and current agenda, all she can respond with is “He is the real maverick” and/or “We’re going to shake up Washington.” How Sarah?
The list could go on, but it’s already pretty massive considering how short of a time she’s been in the spotlight. My own personal politics aside, I think no one can argue she is simply not ready for the position of VP, let alone Pres, and it’s going to take a long time to get there if she ever does.

Posted by: Steve E. | October 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

She’s dumb as a bag of rocks. Since when is being criticized a threat to free speech? I was criticized in school by my teachers, is that taking away my free speech. I’m convinced that either she’s SO dumb, she really wouldn’t get it anyway, or she knows just how to frame an idiotic argument so the real knuckleheads will just nod their heads up and down and agree with her. It all comes down to her being an opportunistic, shameless, lying politician who’ll pander to the devil to get a vote.

Posted by: Martin | October 31, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Has any middle school student informed Bible Spice that the Constitution and the First Amendment protect the right to free speech against infringement by the government? Surely a candidate for national office would know that we don’t have any constitutional rights against the media?

Posted by: ruddyoak | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST MONKEY.
WHAT PART OF THAT DON’T YOU GET?

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

The woman is totally ignorant of the constitution as well as being a religous nut and hypocrite. You betcha.

Posted by: tiny | October 31, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I think the media should dig into this child thing. where are her medical records? It’s going to blow up her face. It seems so obvious, why wont the media cover this? Jeramia wright has been beat into the ground. What about Baby-gate?

Posted by: dave | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

How can this article not mention what the First Amendment actually provides for? (I.e., how can this article not specifically clarify that Sarah Palin’s Constitutional free speech rights cannot POSSIBLY be violated by the “mainstream media”?)

Posted by: AL | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Palin starting to emulate Eva Peron

Posted by: dewde | October 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Hey where is her medical records, promised over a week ago?

Posted by: Teri | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Sarah Palin is beyond stupid. She celebrates stupidity.
Let me explain to her how the first amendment works: She is free to tell all sorts of lies. “The media” is free to say whatever it wants about her lies. End of story.

Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

She is without a doubt the most clueless Vice Presidential candidate in a generation.
Everytime she event mentions the Constitution she exposes her complete lack of understanding of the document.
There is no requirement in the First Amendment that the press agree with her or even report her comments for that matter. She is free to start her own newspaper and report whatever she wants to.

Posted by: JerryStn | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I find these comments posted by Richard Zing offensive and want them removed immediately:
This is just one dumb BQ@th!!!Fck her and the hate train express.
Posted by: Richard Zing | Oct 31, 2008 11:39:18 AM

Posted by: Karen | October 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

the hysteria is just wonderful, as are the Palin gaffes. the Obama haters are out in full force trying to earn the last of their blogging pay….Obama has shown us what a good and decent man he is. We like him. You hate and bizarre mental illness is irrelevant. Rant all you want, since you are OBSESSED with Obama and hating on him.
While you SIT HERE WHINING, we’ll be out working for Obama and WINNING.

Posted by: sallievoter | October 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

So does Palin want to be Queen of the First Amendment, deciding who can and can’t exercise their free-speech rights?
Somehow I doubt she’s familiar with the philosophical underpinnings of the First Amendment. For instance, is she acquainted with the idea that the remedy for what she might consider “bad” speech is more speech, not censorship?

Posted by: Ralph | October 31, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Seem’s to me Palin is Threaten the Media’s First Amendment Rights.
This coming from Palin who just loves the Alaska Independent Party. Send her back to Alask with a one way ticket.

Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Hey Sarah?, Doesn’t the Media enjoy the same First Ammendment rights?

Posted by: Paul, CA | October 31, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Why should we be surprised that the GOP nominated another person who doesn’t have even a basic understanding of the constitution? The constitution guarantees the government won’t infringe on freedom of speech or press. Caribou Barbie has apparently never picked up a copy of the constitution and, if she has, is too dumb to understand it, because she has it exactly backwards.

Posted by: Seamus | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Sara, can you say First Amendment Right of Freedom of the Press. She seems to have this backward. OMG, this woman doesn’t even understand the basic pricipals of the Constitution. She thinks that the First Amendment guarantees her right make attacks, but the “mainstream media” is taking away her rights because they actually question, do research and challenge her claims? OMG…I am so frightened.

Posted by: kari | October 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Governor Palin is a dangerous woman. She doesn’t ever know what she’s talking about. She seems to be completely unfamiliar with the Constitution. She has no grasp of what the First Amendment is all about. She perpetuates negativity and hatred and racism. My sincere hope is that she just would go away.

Posted by: Joan | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I was not a HRC supporter in the primary, but I always recognized that HRC was smart and tough, and would have made a decent president. Anyone comparing her to this joke of a candidate needs their head examined. The press reporting on you is the essence of the first amendment. Palin is free to defend herself, which is similarly the essence of the first amendment. Palin has no understanding of our constitution and no appreciation of the values on which this country was founded.

Posted by: John D. | October 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Please ban Karen Oct 31, 2008 2:52:52 PM from this board immediately for disseminating the Richard Zing hate speech.
My First Amendment freedom to troll is being threatened.

Posted by: Bill Brock - Chicago | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Just read the article on Senator Stevens “I have not been Convicted (yet)” statement. Considering Sarah Palin’s claim that she was found innocent as well, I guess in Alaska: Guilty equals Not Guilty.
I’m sure many Alaskan inmates will be excited to hear this news!

Posted by: Paul CA | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

There’s a difference between a negative ad and an attack ad. A negative ad usually deals with what the opponent wants to do if he or she is elected, so it routinely has to do with policies. What Palin and McCain do is distort Obama’s proposals and then criticize their own distortions. An attack ad is routinely personal in nature and one in which an unproven or irrelevant piece of information is talked about in order to create suspicion about the opponent. This involves innuendo, guilt-by-association, insinuation and other tactics made famous by Joe McCarthy in the 1950′s. If you mention Wright, Ayers, Khalidi or Rezko enough times, even though you’ve provided not one relevant fact, people will begin to connect dots that weren’t there in the first place. That’s what Palin and McCain have been doing. It’s called “The Big Lie” strategy.

Posted by: JohnRJ08 | October 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

does anyone think palin is not anything but
THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING…..boy have we lowered the bar here. The only thing i care about is her mental records silly me..I believe that people in the #1 or #2 chair should be smarter than me……

Posted by: chris | October 31, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Who is stopping this woman from saying stupid things? I don’t understand, unless she thinks playing the victim to the media sets her up for the next election. I also want to see her release her medical records.

Posted by: Keith | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Here’s the truth about Sarah Palin’s secret lover:
http://fivebadapples.wordpress.com

Posted by: Fivebadapples | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

I beginning to think that Alaska should secede from the union. We don’t need any contamintation to the rest of the country’s gene pool with idiots like Sarah Palin. Every day another accusation to cover the fact that she is stupid as a stump. Put on your tin-foil hat Sarah and await the space ship.

Posted by: seansatx | October 31, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

BTW, in case anyone hasn’t been watching the past eight years, the Republicans seems to have a pretty dim view of our constitution in general.
I haven’t heard anything from McBush and Bulwinkle to suggest they would behave any differently.

Posted by: Paul, CA | October 31, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Paul, CA: “Hey Sarah?, Doesn’t the Media enjoy the same First Ammendment rights?”….indeed they do. However, they can’t call it news if it’s propganda. All she is saying is they don’t cover news they are just an extention of the DNC. We know more about Sarah in the short time she has been exposed to this than we do of Obama. They didn’t even attempt to cover Obama and his associations…glossed over it like it was a 30 year old parking ticket. Yet they wanted to know everything about Sarah’s daughter and her pregnancy….for days. I wish they had covered Obama one tenth as much.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I just don’t understand, and have never understood her rational.
And I ALWAYS get offended when she equates intelligence with elitism. Some very smart, very wealthy people, are warm, generous, plain spoken, and down to earth. The Republican party seems to want to stereotype every category of people.
What? Should we hope our children grow up to drink beer (no offense), shop at WalMart (I do), get married when they are in high school (again no offense intended) and …. reverse all the well worn hopes of proper grammar, high ideals, and achievement, even (I know it is a dirty word but,) prosperity …so Republicans can win?
It is an odd.It goes against EVERYTHING we try to teach our students, and our kids.-Excellence! Do your best. Be your best.
This is class warfare of the worse kind.
Even she reads “every magazine” that comes across her desk.

Posted by: Miffed | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

So apparently Palin thinks the first ammendment should protect the government from the press!?!
READ the constitution! It says that the government cannot limit the free press, not the other way around.
The press can say whatever they WANT. Its a free country.
If Palin thinks that she and other members of the government should not have to put up with a free press, she is free to move to China or some place where the government does control the press.
And how can she think that calling Obama a terrorist isn’t a “negative attack ad.”
You and your husband are the ones who hang out with secessionists who say there is no limit to their hatred for America. Why don’t you and Todd go back to help fighting for Alaskan independence.
You call Obama a marxist, yet its you that collectivizes the profits of the Alaskan Permanent Fund through windfall taxes and redistributes them equally amongst all Alaskans, writing checks out for thousands of dollars to every person even though they didn’t do a damn thing to earn it. Its by far the most socialistic and marxist example of wealth redistribution in the US. By far. It is exactly what Venezuela and the middle eastern oil countries do.

Posted by: Nylund | October 31, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

McSleaze funded Khalidi with funds from his GOP think tank…he also has a relationship with Ayers that was revealed by one of your own Guiliani yesterday…so people in glass houses should not throw stones.

Posted by: Shayla | October 31, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

She apparently has no grasp whatsoever on the Constitution. You can say whatever you want, Sarah dear. If it makes people not vote for you, that would be your fault, not the media’s. Moron (see…I’m even allowed to call you a moron).

Posted by: disgusted | October 31, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Hey Mark, I guess we can’t expect all of the media to be as “Fair and Balanced” as Fox. (note the quotes)

Posted by: Paul, CA | October 31, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

You just proved her point – you can’t even quote her correctly without imputing your incorrect interpretation of what she said in the title of your article. What ever happened to just reporting the news as it really happens and in its proper context?

Posted by: Sid | October 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Well, if Obama’s followers inundate critics with unfounded charges of racism and the like, it does raise the worry that the administration itself might engage in such attempts to shut down opposing viewpoints. See banning reporters from newspapers endorsing mccain, see the horrendous treatment of Stanley Kurtz of the national review…
Also, he would have the full support of the press, so it is a concern…
Don’t forget about the “fairness doctrine” a huge prior restraint on speech which is plainly unconstitutional, which Obama would likely not veto…
Oh well, whatever, won’t get fooled again…

Posted by: Wade | October 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Posted by: zk | October 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

The McCain campaign has devolved into nothing more than Them vs. Us. The media vs. Us, the Marxists vs. Us, the 60′s terrorists vs. Us.
Nothing about uniting the country, no reaching out to those in the middle and on the left, just all demonization, all the time.
How does McCain expect to govern effectively, when he labels more than have the country as “socialists”?

Posted by: Madame Defarge | October 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Oh that’s a hoot, dissent about her opinions is against her first amendment right? what does she think first amendment right means exactly? freedom for her to give her opinion without anybody disagreeing with her?
SHE lost McCain the presidency.

Posted by: Citizen Voter | October 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Paul CA: you haven’t seen anything yet. The Dems will certainly curtail rights. Just for starters they will attempt to pass the Fairness Doctrine again. A total failure and extremely unConstitutional. As a LIb I’m sure you are all for that and you know i could be too if it would be enforced across the board but won’t be……newspapers won’t have to comply and neither will TV…..it will be aimed directly and solely at radio. Mainly because it is one of the only mediums that let the people hear the truth. This is America and free speech is for all and I would willingly die for your right to have it but clearly the left only wants to let what they like to be heard.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

What a total idiot. The media is suppressing her 1st Amendment rights???
She’s a moron, pure and simple and needs to not only lose this election, but FAIL when she goes back to Alaska. Alaska deserves better than this halfwit.

Posted by: timpundit | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Poor, poor Moose Sarah, doesn’t want to hear the press is telling her she is negative in her campaining. Sarah, dearest, YOU are not only negative, you are a slanderer and a liar. It’s okay for you to slander and to lie about Senator Obama? But it is not okay when the media and individual citizens tell you that you are negative in your campaign speeches?? Tell me, Sarah dearest, in fact, tell the WORLD WHY YOU think YOU DESERVE special treatment??? You can say whatever you want and noone else can??? Sara, dearest, please bring out your dictionaly and look up the word, “HYPOCRITE”. It aptly and accurately describes you!!

Posted by: NinaK | October 31, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Todd Palin was right, Sarah isn’t “wired” like most people. She’s bat $h-t crazy.

Posted by: Clint | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Oh sarah, you lost me at the wink.

Posted by: sus | October 31, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Mark sez: “They didn’t even attempt to cover Obama and his associations.”
Just because there turns out to be no “there” there doesn’t mean they didn’t investigate. Not everything Sean Hannity considers incriminating turns out to be newsworthy.
For instance: Obama sat down with the staff of the Chicago Tribune earlier this year and answered every question they had about Tony Rezko. No time limit, no restrictions on what to ask. He stayed until they had nothing more to ask.
Will Sarah Palin do the same with reporters for Troopergate, housegate, her per diems for working at home, her kids’ travel expenses, how she feels about the AIP, etc., etc.?

Posted by: Ralph | October 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

> Obama kicks off papers that don’t
> endorse him from his plane.
> Washington Times, New York Post,
> Dallas Morning News kicked off the
> plane.
> How is that for first amendment rights.
Another idiot (besides Palin) who doesn’t understand the first amendment. Free speech does not equal having to give free plane rides to news organizations. Last I checked Palin refuses to talk to certain reports (most, in fact). Now Obama has to give every major news org a ride on his plane or else he’s against “free speech”?
Obama’s choice to boot these people has not been proven to have anything to do with those paper’s views, however likely that is. But you have no idea what the first amendment means if you think not talking to people who disagree with you conflicts with that.
It’s called pragmatic campaigning, and both campaigns do it. He’s kicking McCain’s ass right now, so why should he talk to people who would like to hurt his poll numbers a little? Perhaps not particularly high-minded or laudable, but hardly against free speech.
-Dan

Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Sarah, try telling that to the Dixie Chicks. They got NAILED for darking to speak the truth about W. You didn’t hear them cry about their First Amendment rights. You–and the Dixie Chicks–have the right to speak your mind. The media and the public can react accordingly.

Posted by: CeeMac | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I USED TO THINK THE PALIN IS SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY. nO, SHE IS THE ENEMY, TOO! tHAT’S WHY HER AND JONNY BOY GET ALONG SO WELL. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TIME TO DIVULGE ALL HIS ASSOCIATIONS. THEY OUGHT TO BE TRIED WITH TREASON RIGHT ALONG WITH BUSH.
She was/is a supporter and her husband was a member of thew Alaskan Independent Party. The founder of this party said this…The gates of hell are glaciers compared to the hatred I have for the United States of America and her damned laws. Anyone care to probe that association??? huh?
BY THE WAY, THEY DONT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT NOT GETTING THEIR WELFARE CHECKS
ONCE THEY SECEDE THE US.
CHECK OUT THE AIP WEBSITE: http://www.akip.org/

Posted by: TNP | October 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

“Cast your bread on the water, and it will come back to you”. Embrace anti-intellectualism as a virtue and that cabbage patch produces ding-dongs & fruit loops like George Bush and Sarah Palin. It’s the “unreality” of the Republican platform. Let’s all pretend. Let’s all pray for an alternate reality and it shall be so.
Try to dictate your own reality rather than simply face what is, and eventually you get slapped down hard. Nationwide you can see the flushed complexions and fresh imprint of that hand on their dumbfounded faces.

Posted by: Ralph | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Seriously, we want to put this woman one breath away from the presidency.

Posted by: Rachel, CA | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Thanks Sarah…you have energized the Democratic vote in Florida….thanks to McCain’s selection of you…more voters have returned to the Democratic party everytime you say something dumb…which is everyday…Thanks, Sarah, close the door on your way back to Alaska.

Posted by: Shayla | October 31, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I beginning to think that Alaska should secede from the union. We don’t need any contamintation to the rest of the country’s gene pool with idiots like Sarah Palin. Every day another accusation to cover the fact that she is stupid as a stump. Absolutely no grasp/concept of the Constitution. Just a few days ago she accuses Obama of wanting to rewrite same document…now she complains about the First Amendment!Put on your tin-foil hat Sarah and await the space ship.

Posted by: seansatx | October 31, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

PR: “Gov. Sarah Palin said she fears her First Amendment rights may be threatened by ‘attacks’ from reporters who suggest she is engaging in a negative campaign against Barack Obama.”
What in the world is this woman trying to say now?

Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

At least his not kicking the media off the plan like Obama she confronts them head on. “Barack Obama’s campaign has booted from its airplane three reporters who work for newspapers that have endorsed John McCain.” http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=6156794&page=1

Posted by: Real Story | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Wondering if ABC has any moderator on this site? I simply cannot believe some of these hateful comments. I’m all for everyone being able to exercise their first amendment rights. But I’m also for people showing a certain amount of restraint with their language and wishes for people to be hit by buses, etc. Get a grip and get a moderator!

Posted by: barbara miller | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

I wrote about this sort of twisting of words, once.

Posted by: George Orwell | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Sarah Palin you are wrong. You do not understand the constitution at all. News media you are protected by First Amendment. Please take her on. She says it’s ok if she causes bodily harm by her own words and actions. And FBI is allowing as well. FBI is preventing public from those crowds and the hate those people have. Sarah Palin has no honor or integrity. Sarah Palin has no love of all mankind. Sarah Palin actions in Alaska and being found guilty of abuse of power as Governor does show just who she is.

Posted by: Sharonklim | October 31, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

God, I love that woman!

Posted by: chuck | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

1st Amendment-Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…
Simple, Sarah. You can say what you want and the press can say what it wants.
It’s stunning how someone who has such limited knowledge of the most basic tenets of our country can believe she’s qualified to run it.
Jeez, it’s not like this stuff is written on the wind and must be conjured by an oracle. It’s right there in black and white.
Ask a smart person, Sarah. There’s got to be one standing somewhere close to you. It is a presidential campaign, for God’s sakes.

Posted by: Michael | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

wow…she doesn’t know what the VP does, and she doesn’t understand the 1st ammendment protects everyone’s free speech, hers and the reporters……and she wants to be VP?!

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

You know th more I hear from Sarah Palin, there more I have to question her performance as a journalism student in college. First of all, the first amendment is the reason that both Sarah Palin and the media can speak freely about whatever they want. Now if Mrs. Palin would have mentioned something about libel or defamation, then I would have given her statement a little bit of stock. After all, that is what she’s really concerned, which is the printing and publishing of information that is slander in nature. for the record. Everything that the McCain Campaign is spewing on the trail in a desperate effort to discredit barack Obama falls more in the category of libel and slander.
I really am not surprised that she can’t decipher the two, because when Katie Couric asked her to cite a landmark federal case, the easiest one she should have cited if she were really a journalism student would have been New York Times v. Sullivan. This was infact, “the” landmark case for libel and defamation in the U.S.
It is imperative for any journalism student to know this landmark case. It was a question asked on at least two or three exams throughout my years of undergraduate education.
Amercian conservatives, please stop giving Sarah Palin so much damn credit. She is hardly prepared to be a governor, let alone the vice-president of the United States.

Posted by: Mike from Denver | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Although I do agree that Ms Palin should not have to release her medical records (the law actaully forbids the release of said records to anyone other then persons deisgnated by the patient), the fact remains that she thoughtlessly and very publicly agreed to provide them. Now the McCain/Palin campaign is dealing with another mess largely of their own making.

Posted by: tyewalker | October 31, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Palin repeated the same Thanks but no thanks” lie every day for two weeks, spreads the wealth around in Alaska and sleeps with a husband that’s in an anti-American group, and abused her powers. I’d say the press has been good to her: acusing others of being what she is.

Posted by: claude | October 31, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

The “election” will result in a McCain/Palin win, and then watch what happens. Free speech? Only if you agree with those in power.

Posted by: Vet | October 31, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Is Sarah that stupid? She said she fears her First Amendment rights may be threatened by “attacks” from reporters. Sarah for your information those reporters have the same rights you have. If you have the right to trash Obama, the reporters have the right to trash you. And since you live in the trash bin, it shouldn’t make any difference to you. The First Amendment rights are not just for the people in your part of America.

Posted by: Jai | October 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

OMG, are you kidding me? She is supposed to be able to say anything she wants without anyone questioning her? The First Amendment also covers Freedom of the Press. How can she be VP when she can’t even read the Constitution correctly? This is so much worse than saying the VP is “in charge” of the Senate…..unbelievable!

Posted by: Liz | October 31, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Hello… Obama’s medical files were released, so were Bidens’, and McCain’s… the question is: What is Squeaky Palin hiding???
Silly sarah;s having a baby again!!
(may be not, she is on Un-Christian contraceptives)

Posted by: rufus | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I’m thinking she ate some bad moose meat. Got worms in the brain. I’m trying to be polite and not just say she’s arrogant, stupid, delusional. Nope, I’m going to go with the bad moose meat defense.

Posted by: Marnie | October 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I hates me the uppity colored ones, I does.
That’s whys I iz a votin’t fer Sarah Paelen for head o the senate! We needs us a wooman who knows how to rig them bids and fire thems inlawz!

Posted by: Clueless Clucks Clan | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

This woman is not fit even to be mayor of a small town.

Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | October 31, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“The gates of hell are glaciers compared to the hatred I have for the United States of America and her damned laws.” founding father, Joe Vogler
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ALASKAN INDEPENDENCE (
Q: What is the Alaskan Independence Party?
A: An Alaskan political party whose members advocate a range of solutions to the conflicts between federal and local authority; from advocacy for state’s rights, through a return to territorial status, all the way to complete independence and nationhood status for Alaska.
Q: Aren’t most Alaskan Independence Party members a bunch of radicals and Kooks?
A: The party has its share of individualists, in the grand Alaskan tradition. No longer a fringe party, the A.I.P. is a viable third party with a serious mission and qualified candidates for elected offices.
Q: If Alaska became independent, wouldn’t we lose a lot of federal money?
A: No. If Alaska returned to territorial status, most federal money would still be available. If Alaska were to attain complete independence, its revenues from oil and other natural resources would far exceed the amounts currently received from the federal government, at our current level of resource utilization.
Q: If Alaska were independent, what would happen to my social security check, federal pension, or military retirement?
A: People receive these checks around the world, regardless of their place of residence. In most cases eligibility for such checks would not be affected by Alaskan independence.
Q: If Alaska became independent, would U.S. military bases leave?
A: The strategic location of Alaska would indicate that it would serve U.S. interests to maintain a presence in Alaska. The military are good neighbors. There would be no compelling reason for the military to leave Alaska.
Q: Didn’t we vote for statehood already?
A: The vote for statehood was invalid because the people were not presented with the range of options available to them. Further, the federal government has since breached the contract for statehood on numerous occasions in over a dozen serious and substantial instances.
Q: Under independence, what would happen to all the federal controls and regulations?
A: We believe that controls should be exerted by the lowest possible governmental unit. The people of Alaska can better decide what controls need to be in place than can bureaucrats in Washington. Specific local regulation might be either more or less restrictive than current federal regulation. The point is that it will be our regulation, not Washington’s.
Q: Would I lose my U.S. citizenship?
A: Depending on the form of independence, several forms of citizenship would be possible, including the retention of U.S. citizenship or dual citizenship. However, considering the moral, educational, and economic decay of the U.S., Alaskans’ who hold themselves to a higher standard might very well decide to at least maintain an arm’s length distance from a country in decline.
Q: What will happen to major U.S. stores such as Sears, Safeway, and McDonald’s?
A: Any company which found it profitable to sell in Alaska would remain. Without the constraints of the deteriorating U.S. economy, and with the enormous wealth of Alaska, international as well as local companies will prosper.

Posted by: tnp | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

One might think from her comments that Gov Palin lacked education. After all, as others have noted, one might expect that a Journalism major would have a good grasp of the 1st Amendment.
I’m sure she does. Gov Palin seems to have that prized political ability to knowingly lie and mislead with conviction.

Posted by: brob | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Did the media violate her rights by reporting that her convention speech was full of lies? Did they violate her rights by telling people that she had been found to have violated a state ethics law? The bottom line is that the bulk of what has been written about Palin has been factual documentation of the reasons she was a horrible choice by McCain. Criticism does not necessarily imply a bias.
http://palincounter.blogspot.com/

Posted by: billthomson | October 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Uh, does our not-so-esteemed VP candidate realize that the First Amendment applies to GOVERNMENT interfeerence in speech…not the private sector. RUKM!

Posted by: Kevin | October 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

This is awesome–The governor of Alaska is claiming the press is threatening her 1st amendment rights. I haven’t read the 1st amendment lately, but remind me, does it protect government officials from the press?

Posted by: mike | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

The First Amendment’s free speech clause prohibits government restriction on speech. Last time I checked, the media was not the government. (Never mind that there’s also a freedom of the press clause.)
How can she be qualified for VP, much less president, when she obviously doesn’t understand the Constitution? How can she take an oath to faithfully protect what she has no clue about?

Posted by: dsimon | October 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Apparently, Sarah’s upset because the press uses her own words verbatum, and then she realizes, after the fact, that those same words make her look stupid. Sorry Sarah, you can’t hand pick what you want the press to print, and when they print your own words and you look stupid, it’s your own fault for speaking them in the first place. So, if you can’t get it right, don’t say it.

Posted by: Jay | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

What happened to the countdown to Palin’s medical records? Is the press just going to let that slide now? I’m sure she’s as healthy as a pit bull… but hey, she said she had nothing to hide and would release the records. I think that’s worth holding her to.

Posted by: DogBitez | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

She is an idiot!! The First Amendment protections against GOVERNMENT taking away our free speech, not third parties. Who possibilty could think this woman is qualified to serve as president (were McCain to die), with responsibilities that include naming justices to the Supreme Court? She doesn’t even understand the Constitution.

Posted by: Susan | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Hey, let ‘er talk all she wants. I want everyone to hear exactly what she has to say. She expresses, quite perfectly, the kind of conspiracy-pushing, relgio-political ‘logic’ of a significant percentage of the US population.
We should not muzzle these people, but give them more opportunities to explain their beliefs. The more they talk, the more they expose their ideas to critical examination.
She has no frickin’ idea what the 1st Amendment is, or she would just shut up.
But there’s a kind of beautiful horror that she unintentionally exposes with every grievance-soaked utterance.
She’s not going away after this election, and neither are the millions who think as she does. More exposure will do more than anything else to show the country exactly what the domestic Taliban looks and talks like.

Posted by: T. Jefferson | October 31, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

To Hillary supporters who have not voted. Obama stole (ACORN $800,000 in the primaries plus the money he spent) to beat Hillary.
Are you really going to let him steal the Whitehouse!
Washington does not want McCain to clean things up – Barney Frank – Chris Dodd – good ole boys – Freddie Fannie is much more Democratic issue – look up Community Reinvestment Act.
There is plenty of blame to go around, Bush and his gang, Pelosi and Reid and theirs.
McCain is not Bush -Bill Clinton said he is an honorable man – Palin has good instincts.
She is a conservative not a liberal as Hillary was. But do you really want a radical radical left wing President who does not like this country to buy the White House

Posted by: pbatrs | October 31, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Governor Palin has to be one of the dumbest, most inarticulate people on the planet. What kind of twisted logic does one have to follow to conclude that the First Amendment is threatened by a critical mass media? Moreover, is English even her mother tongue? When one can butcher sentence after sentence so brutally, well, maybe you don’t deserve free speech.

Posted by: Disgusted | October 31, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Failin’ Palin Please! Your negativity is old, very old, much like your Republican running mate! You can not emagine how old your rhetoric has gotten to America. Most of us can hardly wait until Nov. 5; and hope you have returned to Alaska for your trial. If we don’t hear from you for awhile – it will be ok! You betcha!

Posted by: john copeland | October 31, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Palin has played her emotional card of fear and divisiveness – successfully uniting extremists. But this logic does not speak to leadership. …………….
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/10/31/tragic-leaps-of-emotional-logic/

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | October 31, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Who’s the worst associate?
Joe Vogler, founder of Alaskan Independence Party or
Jeremiah Wright, Barack’s pastor
Educate yourself on this site,
http://www.akip.org/
Search your heart people.
God is not mocked Sarah, for you shall reap what you sow…

Posted by: tnp | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

You can tell she was taking notes during constitutional law class.
Oh. Wait. Nevermind.

Posted by: Mage | October 31, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

So she can attack whoever she likes and its okay.. but when the attack is on her, then all of a sudden its violating a constitutional right?
PLEASE TELL ME SHE WENT TO SCHOOL !!!!
Had the media done its job, we would have learned more about her quicker… but its the grassroots bloggers who did the job of the MSM.
What about the medical records she promised to release early this week… here is is friday afternoon and nothing.
She had no clue about anything and every time she speaks, she proves her ignorance more.
I hope that people are smarter than her and vote her back to Alaska on Nov. 4th.
She is a disgrace and embarrassment.

Posted by: lmg | October 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Wow. Did the bridges fall down, ’cause the trolls are OUT. Track marks on Obama’s arm? HEY! JAKE! Where’s your banhammer?

Posted by: Jeebus | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

She’s speaking to her idiot base, who are stupid enough to believe whatever comes out of her uninformed mouth.

Posted by: gizzi | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Dear poster pbatrs: Today’s topic is Sarah Palin and her lack of knowledge on Constitution…learn how to stay on topic darlin’or be sent back to the kiddie table.

Posted by: seansatx | October 31, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

This woman is a bonehead. No one is restricting her rights to free speech; I think she’s talked plenty. She just doesn’t like it when people talk back. But it works both ways. She can says what she likes, and we can comment that she sounds mean-spirited, small-minded, and given to smearing her opponents.

Posted by: meg | October 31, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

The First Amendment says exactly the opposite to what Sarah Palin, in her garbled English, is trying to say.
It protects the right OF the free press. It doesn’t protect government FROM comment by the free press.
Sarah Palin obviously hasn’t read the First Amendment, so here it is: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

Posted by: Phil | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Palin’s most recent half-brained statement is testament to the truth of a recent article published in the U.K. (so it’s not part of the “liberal elite media,” OK?). Following is a quote:
“Until the great failures of the US education system are reversed or religious fundamentalism withers, there will be political opportunities for people, like Bush and Palin, who flaunt their ignorance.”
source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/28/us-education-election-obama-bush-mccain

Posted by: Steve | October 31, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

One positive result of Ms Palin’s candidacy–we’re all learning a lot more about our Constitution! With every misguided utterance on that venerable document which comes out of her beautifully-lipsticked mouth, an army of citizens rush to the Internet to find out what the particular passage actually says and means. Thank you, Sarah, for giving us such a wonderful civics lesson!

Posted by: tyewalker | October 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

When Sarah Palin was reading the constitution about free speech — think she checked out what the constitution says about the Vice President of the United States? I suggest Sarah Palin reads the biography of John Peter Zenger.

Posted by: Pat | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Sarah Palin is not stupid. She has a world view that makes perfect sense to her and her associates. Her reality is formed in different realm. When she speaks there are many people on the far right that completely understand her and agree. Palin hasn’t been in the other world view long enough to be able to hide her agenda or intentions. Thank goodness she couldn’t Let’s send her back to the place she understands and feels comfortable – La La Land of the Right wing Social Conservatives and Federal Tax Dollar recipients.

Posted by: muffler | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Please, somebody tell me how can the media threaten her 1st Amendment Rights. The sheer fact that the media is critizing her is a classic example of excersising 1st Amendment Rights. The media along with Sarah are protected by the 1st Amendment.
And they say “let Sarah be Sarah.” I say go right ahead because she continues to show how unintellegent she really is.

Posted by: EagleEye | October 31, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

So she wants to protect her ‘rights’ by taking away the Media’s? This woman is a real piece of work.

Posted by: Fast Eddie | October 31, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I do not think the First Amendment means what she thinks it means.
This attempt she is making at a legal argument completely belies her ignorance of constitutional law and established Supreme Court First Amendment jurisprudence.
I cannot imagine how any competent campaign advisor could condone this statement. She’s gone completely rogue now.

Posted by: beelzebubbles | October 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

The Republican Party is a pyramid scheme legitimized by the economist Milton Freedman. That substance trickling down on your head is not money, it’s ridicule for being a cow-eyed patsy if you vote for these villains. Joe the plumber is a perfect example, too dumb to know he’s not and never will be a fat cat.
Republican’s actively seek out the least intelligent people and appeal to their baser instincts. It speaks volumes about what they are actually selling America, that they do so.
How do you aggressively dumb-down an entire generation of Americans? You sell them toys with lead paint. [grin]
Oh and sorry Milton Freedman, the free markets don’t regulate themselves (i.e. mortgage meltdown). Deregulation means the consumer/taxpayer gets robbed coming and going. Thanks all you guys with that little “R” by your name. Thanks a ton. Can I have my reach around now?

Posted by: RalphW | October 31, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

She has NO IDEA about the most basic principals of constitutional law. First she thinks the VP runs the Senate and now this. The First Amendment guarantees freedoms FROM THE GOVERNMENT. Arg!! The media is NOT the government. She has no FIRST AMENDMENT rights regarding non-governmental action. Does she mean slander?? Does she even know??

Posted by: hopewhit | October 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Nim,
You’re really equating Obama’s associations to Osama Bin laden? talk about extreme
Let’s address these for a moment.
Rev. Wright- how much do you actually know about wright and his church? the funny thing i always found about the controversy is that when people quote wright, they quote the same like 3 or 4 speeches/sermons… What i find odd is the fact thet the chuch as sermons every week; we are talking about thousands of sermons over the decades. Why is it that they are only able to pull up a scant few sermons out of thousands? Could it be that maybe the church spends 99% of its time talking about less controversial topics, that the usual message from the church is very positive and uplifting? Hell, one sermon that people quote, when putting the whole thing in context sounds like Wright was condemning the Bush administration and not America itself (he made some praise for the Clinton years) The church also more than welcomes Whites to attend the services. Even Oprah was a member for a few years and i don’t see anything wrong with her… Not hard to believe that one could walk into a room to hear the good stuff and then shrug off the rest…
Ayers- This connection is hard to take seriously on the grounds that ayers is well accepted in chicago. Even republican politicans from the area say the attacks on him are rather ridiculous. To condemn ayers like he’s the same man from 40 years ago would be like condemning the entire university that he works for. Its also not hard to believe that Obama could know the guy for years withut finding out about his past; Ayers may not hide his past, but i doubt its the first thing he talks about when he meets someone.
Rezko- There is nothing saying that Obama has done anything illegal with him or even knew he was up to no good. I’m sure their are plenty of people who knew rezko but had no idea what kind of business he was doing. (how many people everyday are surprised to find that a neighbor they knew for years turned out to be a criminal?)
It pretty much goes on like this… the connections are blown horribly out of proportion. People claim Obama’s guilty and most of them don’t give him any kind of a chance. They just look at the bare facts, don’t look deeply into the issue, do not consider any alternative possibilities or reasoning behind such things and just claim guilt by association.
What we have are various controversial connections but zero evidence of any kind of foul that went on with those connections; such as participating or having any knowledge of their illegal actions or having any kind of support for their beliefs… the press looked into these things when they first came up, but found themselves unable to probe any further (and don’t think the media hasn’t tried; they are vultures that love controversy of this nature)

Posted by: Monte | October 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Sarah Palin is a moron who should never have been named to the ticket.
That being said, her cries of “First Amendment” pale in comparison to the ignorance shown by the dimwitted media who bleat: “SHIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELD LAW!” whenever they perceive some slight against their agenda-driven nonsense.
Also, Steve is dead-on right a couple of posts up. This nation has relied for too long on dim bulbs rather than good thinkers. Multiple generations are to blame for this failing.

Posted by: Wenalway | October 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

I don’t even think Palin knows what she means by this statement. It is certainly not the first time people have questioned her statements.
If you really look at it though it means she does not tolerate “anyone” including the media, that do not agree with her. I have heard this about her character that she does not like opposition and this fits. Thank goodness we will not have to hear about her for much longer. The country has more important work to do to restore our economy, build jobs in new green energy and get this country going again.
Palin is a blip on the screen that I am sure will go out.

Posted by: Teriss | October 31, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. OF THE PRESS…OF THE PRESS! The press is guaranteed the right to raise these doubt’s. Granted most of the time they drop the ball, but giving their opinion of a politician’s behavior doesn’t violate anything except maybe her sensibilities (if she has any). Now she wants to BAN newsmedia the way she wanted to ban books. Now that’s Socialism!

Posted by: RichardHead | October 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. OF THE PRESS…OF THE PRESS! The press is guaranteed the right to raise these doubt’s. Granted most of the time they drop the ball, but giving their opinion of a politician’s behavior doesn’t violate anything except maybe her sensibilities (if she has any). Now she wants to BAN newsmedia the way she wanted to ban books. Now that’s Socialism!

Posted by: RichardHead | October 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I SEE ANOTHER MOB LYNCHING OF SARAH PALIN GOING ON HERE. Yes, first amendment rights have been tested, but this is a drop in the bucket for what Obama has in mind. He wants to control everything about you, becauuse…ah…well…because he’s ah…Obama. Even the way he speaks is always an attempt at controlling people. Ask his wife if he is not just a control freak. OBAMA IS NOTHING BUT ANOTHER 8 YEARS OF BUSH TYPE TACTICS AND CONTROL.

Posted by: notonmywatch | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Per Palin, calling Palin a bitch won’t account as a negative attack. It would be a complement actually.

Posted by: pete | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Paling had one job interview before she was offered the job. Reagan’s chief of staff points out that it takes three interviews to get a job at McDonalds. I had SEVEN interviews for my job. How many job interviews should a vice presidential candidate have? Certainly more than one!!!

Posted by: Fran Taylor | October 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Ok that is it this lady is Nuttier than all those ACORNS ever dramed of being.
Forget Foreign policy, GET THIS GIRL A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION IMMEDIATELY!!!
Any bad press this girl has gotten has been deserved. Biden makes gaffes and stupid statements on occasion, this chick makes statements that just may get somebpdy shot or at least hung in effigy.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Here’s the one thing I can’t decide about this election:
What is the more significant problem with Sarah Palin? Is it the hate? Or is it the ignorance?

Posted by: cat | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Pete – Call her a PIT BITCH with lipstick please. She has crazier than MCcain.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

It comes down to one thing: Sarah Palin puts herself first. Forget family or country. It is all about her own agenda and quest for power and fame. She is another Cheney, and we sure do not need that. I get tired of hearing people protect her, or blast the media. I say THANK GOD for the media and that we found out 100% what this lady is all about. Her rights, is that all she cares about? How about the rights of the middle class getting stomped on by Wall St Execs, or the rights of those wolves she allows to be hunted by airplanes. I say stuff her on a plane and send her back to Alaska. We sure don’t want her, and I am not even sure the Alaskans want her anymore. Thank you media, for uncovering what this selfish lady is all about.

Posted by: CaliforniaVoter | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Palin is an example why incest is against the law in many states.

Posted by: Tired of the BS | October 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

What kind of dummy thinks that Rezko, Ayers, Wright, et al have NOT been investigated deeply? Rezko is/was talking to the feds about his dealings with the governor of Illinois, Ayers- McCain said he’s a washed up radical and not important (even though he keeps saying his name) and somebody found a 5-minute clip of one sermon in a 50-year ministerial calling and used it to destroy a great American. Rev. Wright will be vindicated in history.

Posted by: NatFrankie | October 31, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

LEAVE SARAH PALIN alone….. boo hoo, she’s had to leave Alaska to take care of her ailing Great Grandfather who’s running for office and ALL YOU PEOPLE CARE ABOUT IS MORE MORE MORE… boo hoo. Please, please leave Sarah Palin alone. Her daughter is having babies left and right, her husband wants to form his own country, and she can’t make sense of the world around her thinking Russia is just outside her bedroom window. LEAVE SARAH PALIN ALONE.

Posted by: Not really Chris Crocker | October 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

brob -”I’m sure she does. Gov Palin seems to have that prized political ability to knowingly lie and mislead with conviction.” I take issue with the conviction part. I will never foregt that Gibson interview where I was honestly rooting for her to do well. I had already decided on Obama, her convention speech did that for me but still I really did not want a train wreck for anyone. Charlie asked her that question about the BUsh doctrine. I was literally standing ther thinking
“Comeon say you do not know what he is talking about and start talking about he MCcain foreign policies.” Nope she tried to bs her way thruogh and Charlie I think got ticked at that point and just let her have it. Well deserved tooo I might add.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I’m from Alaska and Palin is dumb as they come!

Posted by: Vernon | October 31, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

So Sarah palled around with Ted Stevens, now a convicted felon. Does that mean Sarah pals around with felons? Sure sounds like it. That’s the stupidity of the right-wing argument and it’s why the Democrats will win.

Posted by: irishspacemonk | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Wow she is such a moron, way to vet your VP pick McLame.

Posted by: j | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

To whoever up above me said “John McCain is a true American”….read “Make Believe Maverick” by Tim Dickinson..google it.

Posted by: Kristi R, Tx | October 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

She is a piece of work. Never ever have I seen anyone so artfully turn things 180 degrees to suit thier own agenda, but ramrod anyone else if she can have some personal gain. Scary.

Posted by: BL | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Gov. Palin doesn’t seem to realize that the First Amendment also covers FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, too. Hello!
Oh well, at least she’s aware of the first amendment.

Posted by: Craigary | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Talk about grasping at straws! Sorry Sarah…nothing can save you now!

Posted by: karen | October 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

irish she shares a bed with a guy that wanted Alaska to suceed fro the United States. Isn’t that treason or something?

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Can somebody PLEASE ask Palin if she knows what the First Amendment says. Of course she’ll probably say that that’s gotcha journalism by the elite Washington media. But it’s clear that she has no clue about the constitution. Attacking someone in the press, is not an infringement of first amendment rights. Palin is perfectly free to bring up Rezko and Wright if she wants, the the press if perfectly free to denounce her for doing so.

Posted by: Chris | October 31, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

See I told you guys she made Dan Quail look like a Rhodes Scholar. OMG

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

can someone please sit down with Palin and read the Constitution and explain it to her. This is ridiculous. She has no clue.

Posted by: dddddd | October 31, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

My in-laws live in Chugiak, AK and they don’t know whether to laugh or be frightened to death about Sarah Palin on a national ticket. Not a Democratic or Republican thing, they just think she has nothing substantive to offer intellectually or experience-wise.

Posted by: Lee | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

HMN Hilary supports Obama

Posted by: conny | October 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

I used to think that Palin was just ignorant and lacked knowledge because she was intellectually lazy, but still pretty smart. She’s dumb as a post.

Posted by: dd | October 31, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Somewhere there a a whole lot of Hillary supports that are just rolling in the floor to think that MCCain ever thought that someone this stupid could make anyone of them vote for him. Aparently he checked to see if she had a uterus but forgot to check and see if she had a brain.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

If we didn’t know it before, it’s now official: the woman is a complete idiot.

Posted by: Leila | October 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

So, not only does Palin not understand the role of Vice President, but she either doesn’t understand or doesn’t believe in The First Amendment of The Constitution of The United States of America.
Why in the world would anyone who believes in our Constitution vote for a candidate like this?
If people really want their political leadership to think this way I suggest they emigrate to Russia, where the KGB and the Oligarchs will be only too happy to ensure the powerful are not criticized in the media.
If this candidate doesn’t demonstrate the utter contempt in which John McCain holds the American Voter I don’t know what does.

Posted by: Henk | October 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“Is she this stupid, or does she think everyone else is?”
Yes and yes.
Sarah Palin: The gift that keeps on giving to the Obama campaign.
Just keep talkin’, Sarah, you betcha!

Posted by: Alex | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

OMG. HOW MORE STUPID DOES SHE GET!
THE FIRST AMMENDMENT IS ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT SURPRESSING YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH, NOT THE MEDIA!
If anything, Palin has this exactly backwards, since one thing that the First Amendment does actually guarantee is a free press. Thus, when the press criticizes a political candidate and a Governor such as Palin, that is a classic example of First Amendment rights being exercised, not abridged.
This isn’t only about profound ignorance regarding our basic liberties, though it is obviously that. Palin here is also giving voice here to the standard right-wing grievance instinct: that it’s inherently unfair when they’re criticized. And now, apparently, it’s even unconstitutional.
According to Palin, what the Founders intended with the First Amendment was that political candidates for the most powerful offices in the country and Governors of states would be free to say whatever they want without being criticized in the newspapers. The First Amendment was meant to ensure that powerful political officials would not be “attacked” in the papers. It is even possible to imagine more breathaking ignorance from someone holding high office and running for even higher office?

Posted by: Chad | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Governor Palin has apparently never read the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The First Amendment prohibits the Government from abridging a person’s freedom of speech. A news organization is not the Government and its criticism cannot be considered a violation of someone else’s rights.

Posted by: Bob | October 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

where is Obama’s Birth Certificate
Posted by: chris | Oct 31, 2008 12:06:11 PM
RIGHT HERE YOU IGNORANT VOTER:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

Posted by: Chad | October 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Muffler – thank you I mow think may Todd was on to something about Alaska Scueeding from the UNited States. The Palin could be President of the country of Alaska.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

HMMMMMMM I WONDER IF FOX NEWS WILL COVER THIS.

Posted by: Chad | October 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

A major-party candidate for the Vice Presidency of the United States clearly does not understand the First Amendment to the Constitution. That really, really scares me. I cannot believe this isn’t a huge story. That so many consider a casual association to be a much more important issue than the candidate herself not understanding our system of government is also very disturbing to me. I did not truly fear for our country until this.

Posted by: Lo | October 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

This woman can sure flap her jaws a lot, but nothing that comes out makes any sense. I watched her this morning on one of the news channels for a few minutes, and that was all I could take. what a bunch of hot air blowing nothing. Does any one know how her deposition went. I know her and hubby had to go (I believe) last week for the deposition. I haven’t heard how that went. I think the McCain camp is trying REALLY hard to keep her down. to late for that now. Shouldn’t have picked her any way. And McCain is saying “IF I ONLY KNEW THEN WHAT I KNOW NOW”

Posted by: fairydust | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Wonder if shewill get writers credit for SNL at next years emmys.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

IS THIS HER ‘POTATOE’ DAN QUALYE MOMENT ?????

Posted by: Chad | October 31, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Whine /whine/whine-and she had the nerve to say that about Hillary–Sarah Palin is a con artist at best. She wants people to feel sorry for her. Boo-who-boo who-”feel sorry for me and vote for me”–Please-she is looking for sympathy but she deserves none. She and John McCain rain a slanderous campaign and she knows it. She’s upset because it backfired.

Posted by: lowes4321 | October 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Alright, this one confuses me. It doesn’t seem like she has any real understanding about what our 1st Amendment actually is.

Posted by: dannity | October 31, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Ironic, all this talk about the First Amendment right coming from the book banner herself.

Posted by: Dave Burklund | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

So let me get this straight. If the press criticizes Palin, it’s a violation of the first amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press?

Posted by: Patrick | October 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

So the same 1st amnendment rights that Sarah Palin avails herself of to spew her divisive,intolerant, bigoted, and often ignorant and/or factually incorrrect attacks against Obama shouldn’t be afforded to the press? Unless they lick her boots and promote her nonsense. Wow how dare the press have the audacity to challenge the veracity of her claims and to chracterize her polemics for what they really are – her freedom of speech is being jeopardized. Puleassssse. Sarah just when I thought you couldn’t come across any dumber you manage to move the bar another notch lower. Poor obnoxious, intellectually challenged Sarah. Go back to your hotel and get an early start on packing because you’re going home to Alaska for good next week.

Posted by: drw | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

This strikes me as serious evidence of Sarah Palin’s ignorance of some of the basic tenets of our society. I think it calls for a more thorough examination by the media. It is frightening that Palin could become our Vice President while not understanding the (very) basic nature of the protections afforded by the First Amendment.

Posted by: Pete | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

I wonder if she has ever read the Constitution? Oh yeah, that’s right, she reads everything put in front of her. I guess we’d have to ask her if the Constitution has ever been put in front of her, right?

Posted by: Demosthenes | October 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

wow, just wow. This woman is a category 5 MORON. Everyone gets stupider just by listening to her. Britney Spears or Paris Hilton probably know more about the Bill of Rights and the Constitution than this sorry excuse for an American.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Let me see if I understand this…
Palin objects to the press criticizing a member of the government (her, a Governor, who is campaigning for Vice President) because she thinks it impinges on HER rights to free speech?!?
This shows a complete lack of understanding and respect on her part of what the First Amendment is all about. Maybe she should go read that Constitution of ours. The First Amendment is to protect the people and the press from the government, not vice-versa.
Duh.

Posted by: flint | October 31, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

This chick is a complete nutjob if she thinks the media is supressing her right to talk dirty about Obama. Don’t they always print what she says? Raising the spectre of fear is a tactic used by the Bush administration to control the populace. Stupid us. Palin has already given up on 2008 and McCain. She’s gunning for 2012. God help the GOP if they truly embrace her. She will bring more ruin to a party searching (unsucessfully thus far) for its soul.

Posted by: DaveM | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

This chick is a complete nutjob if she thinks the media is supressing her right to talk dirty about Obama. Don’t they always print what she says? Raising the spectre of fear is a tactic used by the Bush administration to control the populace. Stupid us. Palin has already given up on 2008 and McCain. She’s gunning for 2012. God help the GOP if they truly embrace her. She will bring more ruin to a party searching (unsucessfully thus far) for its soul.

Posted by: DaveM | October 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

More evidence that she has absolutely no idea what the Constitution means. The idea that the first amendment applies to the media is so deeply wrong, coming from a government figure. She is truly dangerous.

Posted by: Oliver | October 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This is worse than Palin trying to explain the VP job to a third grader (which at least has some plausible debate, not that I agree with her at all). The comment that her 1st Amendment Rights are being somehow violated by the media, even wrongly, accusing her of “negative campaigning” belies atruly fundamental misunderstanding of the 1st Amendment. Once again, Hit-Shootin’ Palin digs her own little hole in the world, and somehow thinks she’s on top.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Good grief. All that’s left of the Republican party are freeze-dried whackaloons and Sarah Palin.

Posted by: LiberalTarian | October 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Why does ABC News not put this into context for readers and let them know that Sara Palin does not understand the freedoms protected under the First Admentment. You would think the press, which includes ABC News, would want to get that point across loudly and clearly. She is saying, in essence, that the First Amendment should not allow the press to ask her questions! She has it backwards – the First Amendment protects the presses right to ask questions of politicians, not the other way around. Idiot. And equally idiotic is ABC News that apparently wants to support this “whack job” and lose all rights previously accorded to a free press.
Do your jobs, ABC News. This is no ordinary politician. She has an agenda to rid the country of freedoms such as these. I’m beginning to realize that her “misunderstanding” of the First Amendment, and her “misunderstanding” of the duties of Vice President are deliberate attempts to redefine these. Please pay attention, and at least do as good a job as the blogs do in calling politicians out on dangerous positions like this.

Posted by: Laura | October 31, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Palin does not get it. Its scary how she could possibly be our Vice President, but has no concept of the US Constitution. First her gaffe about VPs “making policy in the Senate” now this.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
She has the right to say whatever she wants. But that doesnt mean she’s not allowed to be held accountable, probed, or attacked about what she says. If you say something in public, be prepared to take responsibility for it.
And the Press has the right to report on it, and for better or for worse, slant it.

Posted by: Astro | October 31, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Sarah Palin is the gift that keeps on give… to the democrats!!
My lord she is just plain stupid.

Posted by: bird | October 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Has Palin ever read the Constitution of the United States? She could not remember what magazine she reads. Was it People or USmagazine? McCain wants the Los Angeles Times to hand over information protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. What about the First Amendment to the Constitution? When I was in Basic Training, there was some sort of a class which included the Constitution. I was a draftee, and I asked the instructor, a 2nd Lt, if the Military Draft was a violation of the 14th Amendment. He was stunned, and had no answer. My Commanding Officer had an answer. I spent the weekend on K.P. To me, this is an example of McCain’s military misinterpretation of the Constitution.

Posted by: Larry Linn | October 31, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Sarah, Sarah, Sarah – keep it up… I really want the independents and undecided voters to continue to hear your voice. Speak up… Shout it… Tell everyone just how much you DON’T understand the constitution – from the job of the VP to the 1st amendment.
Now, mind you, even my 10 y/o twins know that your first amendment rights are not being taken away when you are criticized by a free press or even me.

Posted by: Deb | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I agree with Sarah.
Palin told host Chris Plante, “. . . I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.”
She doesn’t know this or anything else about the first amendment.

Posted by: Mr. Bubba Six Pack | October 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Palin’s ignorance is exceeded only by her lack of integrity. She’s not qualified to be mayor of Wasilla, let alone President/VP of the United States.

Posted by: synykyl | October 31, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Uhmm… doesn’t she kind of have it backwards here? I could be wrong but… isn’t the first amendment supposed to protect the freedom of the press? I didn’t think it was designed to protect powerful political figures from being criticized by the media for their fear-mongering and hate inciting negative campaign tactics. I would be more concerned about our 1st amendment rights if you know who get’s elected.

Posted by: Dan | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Palin is basically an ignorant corrput Alaskan politican, just like Stevens who was convicted and now says he was not. Neither understand law or Constitution..two unethical people from the same state, one more stupid than the other..

Posted by: Alex | October 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Gov Palin said, “…our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and OUR ability to ask questions…” It’s clear she was talking about the rights of American’s (like Joe the Plumber), not just herself or else she would have used “my” and not “our”.
Once again ABC assumes the meaning of Gov Palin’s comment that puts her in the most negative light.

Posted by: Matt | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

sarah says, “bitter shots taken by the mainstream media and by some of the elitism there in Washington”
oh.. i guess she also means the biggest newspaper in Alaska that endorses Obama. I guess they are the “far west elite”?

Posted by: birdy | October 31, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

She’s the powerful governor of a fabulously wealthy state. She is highly influential with the ear of nearly all Americans. I don’t see how her freedom of speech is endangered. Besides, she can always say whatever she wants. No one — not even the media — is stopping her. But the media is also free to say what it wants. That’s how freedom works, Ms. Palin.

Posted by: James from Oklahoma | October 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Sarah Palin thinks everyone that reads books are evil elitists.
She hates smart people. She hates people that read the constitution like Obama who taught constitutional law for 12 years at a tier 1 school.

Posted by: birdy | October 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

The fact is that either this lady is not that bright or that she does not really understand the first amendment. No one is limiting her from saying things, but if she does she can not be expected not to be questioned on it. She can not have it both ways.
This kind of plays may of worked in Alaska but she is playing with the big boys and informed voters in the lower 48.

Posted by: reality | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

i suppose saying ignorant things is free speech. but if you lie, it’s true that you told a lie. keep up the negative attacks if they are true. it’s protected speech under the first amendment.

Posted by: marky | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Under an Obama administration, the only thing Palin will lose is her broad pulpit. Hopefully, after November 4th, her bloviating will no longer have a national audience. She’ll be free to shout inanities into the wind all she wants. Her ranting will be confined to small gatherings of tin foil hat wearing simpletons, looking over their shoulders, watching for the black helicopters to descend on them.

Posted by: Botomatic | October 31, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

“WhatEver!”
Speak to the hand….

Posted by: LMAO! | October 31, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Apparently Sarah doesn’t understand the Constitution very well, particularly considering that she doesn’t even understand how the Constitution defines the role of the Vice President. This is just one more example of how she does *not* understand the Constitution as far as I’m concerned.
Sarah, even the “liberal media” is entitled through the Constitution to criticize your campaign, whether you like it or not.
How anyone can possibly consider her fit for the role of VP, let alone President, is beyond my understanding.

Posted by: livingintheTriangle | October 31, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
I see nothing that says noone can criticize the stupidity of Alaskan hockey mom’s who have no understanding of the Constitution… i DO see freedom of the press…

Posted by: E | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Come on, it’s the FIRST Amendment! I can understand if she’s been too busy to read the Constitution all the way through in 2 months, but this one is right at the beginning! Any rational conservatives left in this country just got SO played, and they actually seem proud of it. Go figure…

Posted by: Derek | October 31, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

UNBELIEVABLE! God forbid this fascist ignoramus gets anywhere NEAR the White House. So by her “reasoning,” you could argue that if the conservative media convinces enough voters that Barack Obama is a Muslim, the wingnuts have violated Obama’s freedom of religion.

Posted by: SpaceCat | October 31, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

So she’s warning about the erosion of free speech because… the pundits are using free speech to say they don’t like “guilt by association” attacks? What an idiotic woman!

Posted by: What a moron | October 31, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The adolescent liberal media attacks continue. The repulsive attack piece by Elizabeht Vargas is just another in a long like of the most biased media coverage of any politician.
Only and idiot could doubt ABC’s dedication to get Obama elected.
Reagan said it well.. the democrats are so far left, they’ve left America.

Posted by: jstacey | October 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Can’t handle the press? How is she gonna handle Ahmedinejad?
Boo-Hoo.
Lawrence Eagleburger says she will just be adequate as VP, will never be ready to lead.
I agree.
http://iamatvjunkie.typepad.com/i_am_a_tv_junkie_a_blog_f/2008/10/boo-hoo—-palin-says-criticism-from-reporters-threaten-her-first-amendment-rights-1.html

Posted by: Joe Bua | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Unbelievable!!!!!! Wow, not only is she lost on the role of the VP, she’s completely clueless about the right of free speech. What’s even worse is that McCain picked her instead of more qualified people. Together with the way his campaign is being run and the pick of Palin has his running mate speaks volumes about McCain’s judgment. Country First?! Please!!!!

Posted by: cspad | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Its interesting that Foxnews doesnt run this story. Maybe even they are embarrassed about what a totally f***ed up idiot Sarah Palin is.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

The fact that the Governor so audaciously mis-cites the First Amendment to the Constitution is appalingly stupid for someone who cliams to be ready to be VICE-President, not to mention President. The First Amendment prohibits Congress from limiting free speech (or establishing a state religion), not requiring press outlets to say what you want or spin how you want or even to cover your campaign. Not to see the not so subtle difference here is sub-par at best. If this is seriously what the Republican base wants to stand by as a candidate, let it be known right now, that their ‘Country First’ argument lies in tatters; they have debased the Republic yet again with their willful ignorance and fear of knowledge. The Founding Fathers, many of whom were polyglots and polymaths, would be horrified.

Posted by: Michael White | October 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Obama is Muslim. and once a Muslim always a Muslim. He only “joined” a “Christian” church because he knew he would never have a chance to be President otherwise.

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

As others have said, Palin seems to have little understanding of the First Amendment. Understandable for any Joe in the street, but not someone running for the office of VP.
As for her saying her campaigning isn’t negative, based on her saying it’s not negative…is that like Stevens saying he wasn’t convicted because he says so? Must be something native to Alaskans.

Posted by: Shelley | October 31, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Hey Sarah, how about you answer some questions about dinosaurs and people roaming together?
Or maybe you can answer why you have a witch doctor?
Or maybe your association with a secessionist party?
Or how you believe in Armageddon to the point of making it a self fulfilling prophesy?
So many questions, so little time and yet Sarah still hasn’t had the guts to sit a full hour on a Sunday show to answer questions like Obama has done.
Sarah – you are a liar and a freak. Go away already and take care that the other youngins’ don’t get knock up too. Yep you betcha. That’s your JOB!

Posted by: I wanna know | October 31, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Has Palin ever read the Constitution of the United States? She could not remember what magazine she reads. Was it People or USmagazine? McCain wants the Los Angeles Times to hand over information protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. What about the First Amendment to the Constitution?

Posted by: Larry Linn | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

So you put lipstick on the pigs of bigotry & racism and culture war by calling it plain speaking and complain when people plum the depths of your words.

Posted by: Max | October 31, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

From over here in the UK, this whole thing seems to look like nothing short of comedy.
I have such incredible respect for America, I see it as the last great bastion of ideals much of the world aspires too.
Putting party politics aside – ignoring whether Palin is Democrat or Republican (or for that matter male or female) – is this really the very best you people can do ! Out of a country of 310 million people are you telling me there is none more qualified or suited to the very real task of being the nations second in command ?
You really can do so much better. The Republican party can be so much more than this, you have good people, clever people – there is little need to employ this clown who embarrassingly struggles through rudimentary questioning and proudly boasts of her anti-elitist ignorance when you have so many better candidates to select from.

Posted by: Lee Wilson     | October 31, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Stupid as a Stump

Posted by: seansatx | October 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

The First Amendment spares you from government action. It does not spare you from being socially ostracized when you make offensive remarks.

Posted by: Allen | October 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Sarah Palin is just angry cos she believes a dinosaur ate her grandpa.

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 31, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Dumb as a doornail, and ignorant of the most basic principles of the Constitution.

Posted by: RealAmerican | October 31, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Too bad stupidity isn’t painful cause Palin would be taking Ibuprofen by the bucketfuls. Someone needs to clue her in that slander and criticism are not synonyms.

Posted by: Major.Domo | October 31, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Here ’tis Palin. Read it over. Now, what LAW has Congress made that you claim is keeping you from continuing to make your stupid and offensive remarks?
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Posted by: Allen | October 31, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I’m a Hillary supporter voting for McCain. All you people that talk down about Palin and call her names… show me I won’t be a part of a party that can’t show respect for a woman.
Gov. Palin will be On The Record tonight on Fox. :o)

Posted by: Tiffany | October 31, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

In the words of Forrest Gump: “Stupid is as stupid does.”
Sarah Palin is deliciously, deliriously, dangerously stupid. Ignorant, too, and she revels in that ignorance there. Oh ya betcha.

Posted by: Bill Johnson | October 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

um, what? did any of that blather make any sense?… this woman is a boastful ignoramus

Posted by: zelda | October 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!
I TOLE HIM, YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON MICHELLE, BUT IT’S STILL A GORILLA!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Sarah doesn’t grasp the concept of *political correctness* which is what a national-caliber politician NEEDS. She doesn’t grasp the fact that it was WRONG to get her crowds all worked up into a hateful, racist frenzy.
She wants to be unfettered to bring up the subject of Reverend Wright for ONE REASON ONLY, and that is to make an issue out of racism. She doesn’t understand that doing so would be MORALLY wrong, and that is the worst part about Sarah.
Never mind the fact that she has a twisted sense of what the 1st Amendment means, that is small potatoes compared to the fact that she sees nothing WRONG with making an issue out of racism in this election.
She truly doesn’t get it. I don’t see why ANYONE would call her a gifted politician. She is anything BUT!

Posted by: mavisdarling | October 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I see stupid people … and Palin is their hero!!

Posted by: Paul | October 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Sarah, I wish they would leave you alone!…..with me…..in my bedroom! So we can play with oil!

Posted by: Gina | October 31, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Palin’s comment make perfect sense. You just substitute “Congress shall make no law” for “The mainstream media shall publish no opinion/article/thing” and “abridging the freedom speech, or the press” for “anything criticizing anything Sarah Palin said.”

Posted by: Smitty McGhee | October 31, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

The GOP is the party of the hate filled segment of the US — KKK, White Supremacists and the American Nazi Party. That is indefensible. Republican rule has destroyed the economy of the United States. Palin is nothing but the end result of 8 years of dumbing down the Republican party. She makes me sick, Neocons make me sick, and the hopelessly ignorant “main stream” republican voters make me sick. Dumb asses through and through. With only a little luck voters will pull the handle and FLUSH republicans from the white house and into the sewer where they belong.

Posted by: Satan | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Her First Amendment rights? How are they being violated? She said these things, she was not thrown in jail, or shipped to Guantanamo… She got to say them with no reprisals from the government.
She has been criticised. Awww, poor baby. Criticism is NOT a violation of your First Amendment rights, you idiot.

Posted by: Mark | October 31, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Sarah is a republican HOE. There! My first amendment rights are intact.

Posted by: trox | October 31, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Khalidi is a respected professor who has criticized Yassir Arafat and the PLO. One of his friends was Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg. Is the rabbi anti-Semitic? If so, then so is John McCain, who chaired a group that steered almost $500,000 to Khalidi’s organization:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/28/mccain-funded-work-of-pal_n_138606.html

Posted by: Viking | October 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Why doesn’t Palin discuss her medical records? We need to know if she’s been honest, afterall she could be the next VP. Why hasn’t this issue been a big demand from the media?

Posted by: Linda | October 31, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Hey Tiffany,
I am with you!! Also a previous Hillary supporter voting for McCain!!
I have told every pollster I’m voting for Obama because I can’t wait to see his face when he LOSES!!!
I was appalled that Obama not only mocked Hillary in so many ways, but never spoke up about the hate the Dems and Media constantly expoused! He is doing the same with Palin!!

Posted by: Denise | October 31, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Palin:
then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.”
====
ABC, you truncated her quote. She immediately says “Look at Joe the Plumber”. She is talking about average citizens being investigated for merely asking questions to a person in power.
That’s some pretty bad editing, ABC. Why do that?

Posted by: MayBee | October 31, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Governor Sarah Palin drives you Dimocrats up the wall. That is priceless!

Posted by: rminva | October 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Dear Denise,
You are a STUPID FCK! LOSER!

Posted by: RESI | October 31, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Well, now we know for SURE why the McCain people were afraid to just “let Sarah be Sarah”. Her Sarah-ness may work in various pockets of podunk wasteland around America, but NORMAL people are not impressed nor amused with Sarah Palin.

Posted by: mavisdarling | October 31, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Palin has been talking,and talking and talking. She incites people by calling Obama terrorist, trader, socialist, unamerican. If that isn’t hate speech I don’t know what is. She lies about Obama issues. She doesn’t have international experience at all. I don’t care that she can see Russia from her back door. The final problem is she is Cheney in a dress and that scares me more than anything. Plus she has problems and hopefully they will impeach her for her Troopergate and maybe she is lying about a lot of things.

Posted by: anna | October 31, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

According to Palin, the First Amendment guarantees the government freedom from the press, not the other way around.
Don’t let this woman become vice president.

Posted by: SkippyFlipjack | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Hey, I wonder if Biden has gotten that man in the wheel chair to stand up yet? Do you think Biden has learned the number of letters in the word “jobs” yet?

Posted by: usmfan | October 31, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

I started not to post anything, but there a few classifications that I would like to mention.
First of all, Obama already sent out his medical records, and if people paid any attention, they would know it.
Secondly, anytime you enter the spotlight you take a chance with the media getting up in your personal life. It has nothing to do with whether the person is a male or female, black or white.
Third of all, I personally feel like if you can’t put anything appropriate on here, then maybe you shouldn’t be posting on here in the first place. Calling people “Gorillas,” is uncalled for.
Finally, all I have to say is ALL you ex-Hillary supporters obviously you were just in it to support a woman and not the things she stood for. I am a woman, who is focused on the issues and not GENDER.

Posted by: Pay attention | October 31, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

If anything, Palin has this exactly backwards, since one thing that the First Amendment does actually guarantee is a free press. Thus, when the press criticizes a political candidate and a Governor such as Palin, that is a classic example of First Amendment rights being exercised, not abridged.
This isn’t only about profound ignorance regarding our basic liberties, though it is obviously that. Palin here is also giving voice here to the standard right-wing grievance instinct: that it’s inherently unfair when they’re criticized. And now, apparently, it’s even unconstitutional.
According to Palin, what the Founders intended with the First Amendment was that political candidates for the most powerful offices in the country and Governors of states would be free to say whatever they want without being criticized in the newspapers. The First Amendment was meant to ensure that powerful political officials would not be “attacked” in the papers.
Is it even possible to imagine more breathaking ignorance from someone holding high office and running for even higher office?
I can’t. But then folks like rminva whose only response is:
“Governor Sarah Palin drives you Dimocrats up the wall. That is priceless!”
remind me that such idiocy is not confined to the political class. It also pervades those who support and elect them.

Posted by: agent | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I can’t figure out if Palin is dangerously unqualified or knowingly undermining the democratic process. How anyone can advocate for her to be a heartbeat away from the presidency is equally mystifying.

Posted by: eyesus34 | October 31, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

The media didn’t hound Joe the Plumber, he called a freaking press conference, does televised interviews on Fox, and campaigns. Apparently, he loves the media, reddog. And probing into Sarah Palin’s businees?! This is an ELECTION. I cannot believe that you would use idiocy like this to excuse her total lack of understanding of the Constitution of the United States of America. This should be the icing on the cake for people with brains. She has absolutley no business, at this time in her life, possibly becoming Commander in Chief. None. Freedom of speech, freedom of press. I do not feel sorry for her. Stop making excuses for this woman. I could give a rat’s a$$ about her medical records, or who she sat by in 3rd grade. I do care about her basic lack of knowledge in her interpretation of the 1st amendment. Pretty important to know that as VP.

Posted by: Lydia | October 31, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

She has a degree in journalism and she doesn’t know what the First Amendment says?

Posted by: Wendy Marchand | October 31, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

TIFFANY, PLEASE!! Palin deserves NO respect and all the names thrown at her. Have you not listened to all the names SHE’S been spewing? Do you have ears?

Posted by: seansatx | October 31, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

d0 says:
“… [Obama] leaves his own brother in poverty at $1 per month in his homeland, his aunt on the streets of Boston”
This is complete bull. Here’s an article about BO’s brother:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4583353.ece
(Note for the impaired: This is not the NY Times)
A quote from the article:
“They say I live on a dollar a month, but this is all lies by people who don’t want my brother to win.” He said that he was supported by his mother, Jael, who now lives in the US, and by a cousin in Huruma.
Here’s an article about his aunt:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/31/for_obama_aunt_a_quiet_south_b.html

Posted by: Jon Thaler | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

WHY on earth aren’t the media (the word is plural, by the way) SCREAMING for Palin’s medical records? What on earth is in there?
They better yell fast.

Posted by: Steve martin | October 31, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

No wonder her handlers have tried to keep her muzzled. Middle school kids have a better understanding of the First Amendment than this dunce.

Posted by: Nancy Beth | October 31, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Associations? They amount to nothing more than what has been spelled out already “Ms. Palin”. You are not plain nor outspoken – what you say is scripted beyond belief – yes beyond belief, no one believes this other than folks like you, and fortunately that is looking to be a minority this time around. We do not want your type in office anymore – 4 days and counting!! Then it will be “President Obama”. Scared? Get back to Alaska where the other outcasts live – most of them there are admirable tho.. You might not fit in.

Posted by: Andy | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

so BillW, what IS your point? That the USA is some theocracy where only Christianity is allowed and Muslims cannot run for president? Better read the WHOLE first amendment, dude. It talks about religion too.
There is NOTHING wrong being MUSLIM. NOTHING! Why are you insinuating that there IS something wrong with being Muslim? It’s not an evil religion.
S0 what is the problem with Obama’s statements in his book? There isn’t anything wrong with knowing people, even being RELATED to people who are Muslim.
Maybe Obama WAS a Muslim! Who cares? It’s a FREE country!!
I think we NEED a president who understands Muslims AND Christians. That is EXACTLY the type of guy we need!!!!!

Posted by: mavisdarling | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

OMG, I’m Canadian, and I know the First Amendment better than she does. Is she really this stupid? Does she understand free press?

Posted by: helly | October 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

So, lemme get this straight. When democrats criticized President Retard over the war, FOX NEWS called those people un-American, traitors to their country. So, can we say the same thing about THAT mainstream media? A double standard? YOU BETCHA!

Posted by: Jimmy R | October 31, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Associations? They amount to nothing more than what has been spelled out already “Ms. Palin”. You are not plain nor outspoken – what you say is scripted beyond belief – yes beyond belief, no one believes this other than folks like you, and fortunately that is looking to be a minority this time around. We do not want your type in office anymore – 4 days and counting!! Then it will be “President Obama”. Scared? Get back to Alaska where the other outcasts live – most of them there are admirable tho.. You might not fit in.

Posted by: Andy | October 31, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

is she really that STUPID? 1st protects our free speech from GOVERNMENT control
not what other people say about us!

Posted by: nick | October 31, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I would have pulled the lever for McCain but when he took Palin as his running mate, there was no way.

Posted by: LittleMissMooseShooter | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Associations? They amount to nothing more than what has been spelled out already “Ms. Palin”. You are not plain nor outspoken – what you say is scripted beyond belief – yes beyond belief, no one believes this other than folks like you, and fortunately that is looking to be a minority this time around. We do not want your type in office anymore – 4 days and counting!! Then it will be “President Obama”. Scared? Get back to Alaska where the other outcasts live – most of them there are admirable tho.. You might not fit in.

Posted by: Andy | October 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Case in point for Powell and the rest of us that support the constitution.

Posted by: akamai | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

I would tell Palin to read the Supreme Court’s NYT v. Sullivan decision, but she probably thinks the Court is an elitist, East Coast institution unworthy of her attention.

Posted by: Thomas Moore | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

“From a Proud Lifelong Democrat who will never fall for the false lies of Obama!”
LOL… “false lies”?… yep i reckon you for the sort of person who would never fall for those.
“OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST MONKEY.
WHAT PART OF THAT DON’T YOU GET?”
*shakes head* None of it, none of it at all. Thankfully the majority of my fellow citizens don’t get it either.

Posted by: Joe the Accountant | October 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

mavisdarling: “what IS your point?”
Obama answered your question. “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

There is no hope for this country. Rigged elections; loss of freedom. What a change from the 90s. Thank you, you TREASONOUS Republicans! You ALL should be IMPRISONED!!!!!

Posted by: babs | October 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Just how stupid is Sarah? Has anyone ever asked a professional to evaluate her? Or like everything else about her would that simply be time wasted?

Posted by: BenDover | October 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Sarah, stupid? Man, you people are hurting! She has fired up the Republican base and she’s hot on your heels (which assumes you Obama hippies wear shoes.) Next week you all will be promising to move to Canada!

Posted by: sara | October 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

She will get to November 4 without a press conference, or an appearance on Meet The Press, Face The Nation or This Week. Faux can’t be taken seriously. Faux has been a failure. Which is its standard. So the fifth from the bottom of his class mccain approves heartily.
Do the press folk who coddled McCain see what they’ve created? Do they like this? A candidate who says she is threatened by open free reporting and investigation? Because she would rather do her business in secret?
Then why aren’t they reporting THAT?
Her only media appearances are with McCain -friendly anchors and news outlets. Because the press didn’t do its job. And only after being slapped with the fact it didn’t do its job is it insulted.

Posted by: kravitz | October 31, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

So let me see if I’ve go this right: Palin’s 1st Amendment Rights are being challenged because some folks in the press actually analyze the facts of what she says. So, she wants (demands) that they stop. How is that not infringing on the 1st Amendment rights of a free press?
I am struck by how many of the comments on this article are dodges, turning away from the very big, very real question at hand bring up old saws about birth certificates and maternity and medical records. Whatever you may feel about these issues, Palin’s attempt to cast any and all criticism of her as 1st Amendment violation IS the topic at hand…and it is a doozey!

Posted by: Bungy | October 31, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

mavisdarling re Palin:
“She wants to be unfettered to bring up the subject of Reverend Wright for ONE REASON ONLY, and that is to make an issue out of racism. She doesn’t understand that doing so would be MORALLY wrong, and that is the worst part about Sarah.”
Twisted logic at best. Is is brought up to show Obama abides racism when it’s against whites. Obama supporters ignore this fact.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

mavisdarling: pay no mind. Those comments were all deliberately taken out of context, distorted, and/or misquoted, in order to discredit Senator Obama. Just more cheap shots from a party which has lost its moral compass and is hopelessly spinning in the sea. (Copy/pasted from a chain letter, no less)
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/o/obama-books.htm
Mr. Obama was making a perfectly American statement; he will stand up for those who are being unfairly persecuted. (Hmmm… Party of Lincoln forgot that principle too?) And he was speaking at a time when Sikhs were being assaulted because they were mistaken for Arab “ragheads”.

Posted by: Joe the Accountant | October 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I just want to hear the world cheer with joy and relief the moment Obama is elected President of the United states.

Posted by: akamai | October 31, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I gotta say, I’m happy to hear that people in this country are starting to wise up a bit. We got Bush the first time around because folks wanted someone they could have a beer with instead of someone who was clearly more intelligent than 99% of the populace. Now, we have people that like Palin because she’s, well, not that bright so most people feel that they can relate to her. I’m sure I wouldn’t mind sitting next to her, watching our kids play soccer together while talking about the “theory” of evolution or how the first amendment only applies to us but not our critics but that doesn’t mean I would want her even babysitting my kids, much less running the country.
Personally, I want the head of the country to be the smartest person in the room, whereever they go. It’s kinda like working for a company, would you rather have your local bartender running the show or Warren Buffet? You could probably relate to the bartender but would feel a lot more comfortable having your livelihood controlled by Buffet.
Despite this for our personal lives, we still many people that would rather have a Prez (ranked 5th from the bottom of his college class) and Vice Prez (obviously of a mediocre IQ) who are merely average in regards to intelligence.
Thank goodness we’re starting to apprecicate the importance of actually having intelligence as a pre-qualification for the most important and powerful job in the world.

Posted by: MK | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Obama answered your question. “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”
You really need to get your research from places other than forwrded e-mails. That one has made the rounds many, many times. The rest of the quote goes on to say that he stands with muslim American’s after 9/11, that he won’t villify them. I can not believe that at this juncture you still believe this stuff. McCain said he wasn’t a socialist, so now you’re on to communist? Look, you’re not voting for him, we get it. You know none of these things are true, it’s very easy to verify them all, here in the information age. You don’t like the guy, so be it. You don’t have to follow it up with the same old rhetoric over and over. Vote for the Mavericks, nobody is stopping you. But, by the other token, save your breath, go pray or something, the only people who actually listen to you are the people just like you. You can’t convince anybody of anything.

Posted by: Lydia | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

This is Grade A ideological manure, plain and simple.
It reminds me of the same line of illogic with which the media currently operates – give both sides of every argument equal time. On the surface this sounds great. Unfortunately, the cynical use it as an opportunity to pass rubbish off as fact. We need to start calling an idiot and idiot. And while some people in this country may have their heads in their posteriors, those of us who do not get nauseated when we hear this kind of thoughtless rambling being given and serious consideration whatsoever.
Why in the world can this country not accept the reality that being smart is not a bad thing and being an ignorant bigot is not something in which one should take pride? That’s not elitist and that’s not anti-American. That’s being a responsible adult who personally despises idiots. And it’s the responsibility of those who are not idiots to smack this kind of jibberish down and call it what it is – just plain ignorant. It shows a complete and utter lack of understanding about what this country’s history and laws even mean or what they were intended to do. If this were a child, you might scold them or softly correct them. But this is not a child. This is a candidate in which the Republican party deems capable of serving as the VP (and potentially as the President itself) of our nation. To be honest I don’t know which is more cynical and which is more daft.
I for one sometimes hope that Sarah Palin IS the new face of the Republican party post it’s long foreseen split. If she represents it’s future then all the Democrats need to do to ensure their control of Washington is increase the budgets for education. But fear not, because a more intelligent nation will breed more intelligent leaders. And that holds true for both parties. And maybe then we can begin to act like a civilized nation and not a greedy, bigoted, ignorant, intolerant bunch of fundamentalist fools.

Posted by: James | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I value my rights, am a woman and know that i know what is best for me. I believe in the Constitution.
I have voted Republican in the past. Voted other last election.
I make more than $200,000 a year, have health insurance, hire employees oversees, and I am voting for Obama/Biden.
I am voting for them because a party I once believed in now stands for lies, racism, fear, bottomless greed, laws based on church morals not secular standards, and acts like a mirror image of extremists who are the enemies of our country.
This is a very important election. Your thoughts should be weighing very heavy on how you will choose to support this country on November 4.
The only true American action would be to vote Obama/Biden.

Posted by: cap-list not soc-list | October 31, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Oh, and one last thought… if Mrs. Palin is the “future” of the Republican Party, as many of you seem to hope or believe, then it has learned nothing from its defeat and it will continue to suffer more of them.
- Once-Proud-Republican

Posted by: Joe the Accountant | October 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

So what is WRONG with standing with Muslims? You didn’t answer the question, dimwit. He doesn’t say he is going to stand with terrorists or fundamentalist Christians, both of which are FAR more dangerous groups than your generic Muslim.
I LOVE OBAMA. He is SO very awesome.

Posted by: mavisdarling | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

what the heck would sarah palin know about any constitutional rights? I guess they coached her on this also!!!she, just like mccain, wants to drag this country down the tube with their tax cuts for the wealthy and continuing to MAKE the working people pay for their 10 homes they own all over the world and their private jets. the odassitey of her thinking that she can use the state of Alaska’s money to travil and house her children around the country, taking time off at her 2.2 million dollar home and charging it back to the state and using that states money to pay for housing, air planes, fuel for those planes, ammunition for guns to take others on a wolf hunt!!!!
this is the kind of government the republicans want. this is the kind of government that mccain supports. this is the kind of government that bush stands behind and has stood behind for the last 8 years!!!!! and you people want more of this???
she calls Obama’s plan socialism when in her on state she fought for making the oil companies share the wealth with “ONLY” tax paying citizens of Alaska!!! she said screw the one’s on unemplyment.
GIVE ME A BREAK—wake up america and smell the GREED!!!

Posted by: scooter the plumber | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

lydia:
It would Obama’s case if he had worn the flag pin without being forced to, as well as placing his hand over his heart during the national anthem. He brings suspicion on himself without help from me.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Boston Globe
“While we’re at it, let’s demand Obama’s medical records, too”
October 6, 2008
On May 29th, 2008 Senator Barack Obama released a one-page letter from his primary care doctor, who had not even seen him in 18 months. The doctor stated he was in good health trying to overcome his smoking habit.
McCain released 2500 pages of medical records for review in 1999 and 2008.

Posted by: EnergyMain | October 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

mavisdarling:
“You didn’t answer the question, dimwit.”
Name-calling is a typical Obama supporter response. Those with higher intellect are above this.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

that theres anyone who thinks she’s qualified despite her clear lack of understanding of the first amendment…
is astounding.
doesnt get freedom of the press. wow.

Posted by: Goon | October 31, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Man, Palin’s dumber than a box of rocks. I cannot believe McCain picked this woman.

Posted by: GoMoreRogue | October 31, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

mavisdarling”
“He doesn’t say he is going to stand with terrorists or fundamentalist Christians, both of which are FAR more dangerous groups than your generic Muslim. I LOVE OBAMA”
What about those that blew up the towers and those chopping off peoples heads. Do you love them too?
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

She will get to November 4 without a press conference, or an appearance on Meet The Press, Face The Nation or This Week. Faux can’t be taken seriously. Faux has been a failure. Which is its standard. So the fifth from the bottom of his class mccain approves heartily.
Do the press folk who coddled McCain see what they’ve created? Do they like this? A candidate who says she is threatened by open free reporting and investigation? Because she would rather do her business in secret?
Then why aren’t they reporting THAT?
Her only media appearances are with McCain -friendly anchors and news outlets. Because the press didn’t do its job. And only after being slapped with the fact it didn’t do its job is it insulted.

Posted by: kravitz | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

BillW and other McCain backers (or those simply voting against Obama)… I’ve definitely read up everything that I can on both my candidate and yours, can you say the same? Check out the following story about McCain, whose past hasn’t been examined in much detail except for his time as a POW:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain

Posted by: MK | October 31, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

BillW
LOL Suspicion? Suspicion of what?
I’ll tell you this… I’ll judge a person by their actions first, words second and shallow token gesture never. So go ahead and wear your pins and cover your heart if it makes you all feel more American. I for one trust people like that far less.

Posted by: James | October 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

QUALIFICATIONS? WHAT QUALIFICATIONS?
The only thing relevant as far as I can see is HOW DID THIS NITWIT EVER WIN ANY PUBLIC OFFICE?
SHE LACKS VERY ELEMENTARY KNOWLEDGE OF OUR CONSTITUTION. One paper asked whatever happened to civics education? I can only echo that statement.
First she shows a complete misunderstanding of the role of the office she seeks.
Now she has demonstrated that she has no idea what the FIrst Amendment is. An average 5th grader should know more than this woman has demonstrated.
Don’t you all think it is just a little important that a candidate for Vice President of the United States have some basic knowledge of the United States Constitution?

Posted by: MollyW | October 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Earth to Palin…
The 1st Amendment protects freedom of speech for the public and the press, not just for mud-slinging politicians — in fact, often as not, against icky characters like certain ultra-ambitious, mow ‘em down and to hell with anything decent, disgustingly hypocritical governors. Like it or not, sweetie, you are the government you say is so reprehensible.

Posted by: Janell Carter | October 31, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

lydia:
“The rest of the quote goes on to say that he stands with muslim American’s after 9/11″
That implys partiality. He should have said ‘he stands with Americans of any heritage’. You read into things in a shallow manner..
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

James:
“So go ahead and wear your pins and cover your heart if it makes you all feel more American. I for one trust people like that far less.”
Then your judgment is twisted.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

In terms of the First Amendment – didn’t she get her degree in Journalism? Either she’s that stupid or the school she went to should have their accreditation lifted or what ever faculty members passed her should be investigated for gross imcompetence.

Posted by: LifeAsMontyPython | October 31, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

I guess because Sarah can’t see the Constitution from her house, she doesn’t really get what it says. The press, or anyone, calling her out on the veracty or relevance of her McCarthyesque guilt-by-associations claims, doesn’t mean they are infringing her First Amendment rights. In fact, quite the opposite. They are rightly exercising them.
Of course this is the same woman who has yet to give a press conference and has only limited interviews where she talks in soundbites, so not surprising she gets yet another part of the Constitution wrong. So that makes Habeas Corpus, Article One about the duties of a VP and now the First Amendment, she got totally wrong. Yeah, one heartbeat is the scariest thing this Halloween.

Posted by: Heidi | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

There have been tons of stories about Wright & co. There’s nothing there.
Wright we went through in the primaries. Old news. ABC played the tapes endlessly, but we all got bored of them a long time ago.
Rezko was another one we finished in the primaries. He bought the house next to Obama’s & sold it for a profit. There’s no evidence that Obama did him any favors.
Ayers is a respected professor now. He disavowed terrorism a long time ago. That 9-11 article had fabricated quotes. The events happened when Obama was 8. Their “association” consisted of helping the same charity; one started by a Reagan associate and attending one political event a long time ago. He didn’t “launch” Obama’s political career. Obama won that election by invalidating the faked signatures of his corrupt Democratic opponents to run unopposed. But you always forget that part when it’s inconvenient, don’t you?
The new Palestinian guy they’re floating around belongs to an association McCain funded to the tune of $500,000. He’s not a terrorist, nor has he killed anyone.
If YOU had bothered to research these “associations” you would know that you’ve got nothing. That’s why there are no big headlines. They’re even going soft on McCain.
McCain was a member of the Keating 5 (not an “associate”). He got away with accepting thousands upon thousands of dollars in gifts and free vacations because it happened when he was in the House and the Senate probe could only sanction him for things that happened in the Senate. He once recklessly flew his plane in Spain and cut some power lines causing an international incident. While the rumors of him crashing 5 planes are exaggerated (most had mechanical problems), this incident is one he admitted to in his biography, just like where he nearly flunked out of the Navy on demerits (and was in the bottom 1% of a class of 900+). He opposed the MLK holiday and removing the Confederate flag, but later apologized.
But you don’t see headlines about THAT, do you?
Palin was found guilty of abuse of power in Troopergate. While her sister’s ex isn’t a nice guy, what she did was illegal according to the report (which started BEFORE she became a candidate; back then she had pledged to cooperate). She reversed course on the Bridge to Nowhere once it got unpopular (the ADN has quotes of her to prove it) and was the chair of Sen. Ted Stevens’ political action committee. You know, the guy who just got convicted of accepting bribes (to be fair, she & McCain asked him to step down, though he has refused saying it’s just political posturing on their part, so he doesn’t hold it against them).
Yeah, Sen. Stevens is in the news, but they’re not exactly raking Palin over the coals for her “association” with him, now, are they? And he’s a convicted felon! (The conviction was _NOT_ suspended pending appeal.)
So grow up and quit whining about “bias.” The facts aren’t on your side and they never were. McCain is on course to lose even Arizona and hearing you talk only makes me want to volunteer to help him lose it. And I’m a registered Republican!

Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

MK:
“Check out the following story about McCain, whose past hasn’t been examined in much detail except for his time as a POW:”
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick
I checked that a week or so ago. It’s a ‘he said this, the other person said that’ article. Totally useless material for using as judgment.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

> In terms of the First Amendment – didn’t she get her degree in Journalism? Either she’s that stupid or the school she went to should have their accreditation lifted or what ever faculty members passed her should be investigated for gross incompetence.
Which university would you discredit, though? Palin went to at least 4 different universities to get her degree in journalism.

Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

When McCain first brought Palin in I felt sorry for her because of his reasons for it. I left my options open for voting but as this has gone on I no longer feel sorry for her only because of the above reson. She has made her bed and must sleep in it. By the way, my voting options are still open and if anyone complains I will say that you are violating my 1st amendment right.

Posted by: Wondering | October 31, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Dear Scooter the plumber,
Just how many times have you seen McCain wear a flag lapel pin? Never! Why didn’t you and the press force him to wear one, since that seems to have become such an accurate indicator of who would be the best president?

Posted by: Janny | October 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Wondering:
“When McCain first brought Palin in I felt sorry for her”
So did I, but I voted for her by pushing the McCain button. The woman has guts, matbe more than any of the other three.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Billw:
“I checked that a week or so ago. It’s a ‘he said this, the other person said that’ article. Totally useless material for using as judgment.”
Um, I know. In court, they call those people witnesses.
Of course, using your own words, anything beyond a casual association with Ayers, Rezko, Wright or Khalidi is useless material to use as judgement because they’re all based ‘he said this, the other person said that’ so you should be instantly dismissing those as well, right? Or, much like some people’s opinion of the first amendment, that only applies when it favors you?

Posted by: MK | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

it is unconstitutional to criticize a politician????

Posted by: Charles | October 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Hello Scooter the Plumber,
They are ALL full of GREED on both sides of the parties.

Posted by: Wondering | October 31, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Face it .. the media picked their man Obama and they will slime whoever gets in their way and ignore anything Obama does.
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/10/top-reasons-to-vote-for-obama.html

Posted by: Michael | October 31, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

BillW,
WOuldn’t totally argue with you on that one but doesn’t help putting herself in the sam pit as most of the other politicians out there. Only you can choose where you lower yourself to.

Posted by: Wondering | October 31, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

She has it backwards. Palin can say what she wants, but the First Amendment also protects freedom of the press. But why would anyone suggest that she is waging a negative campaign by talking about socialism and palling around with terrorists?
She herself uses socialist words to describe the “collective” ownership of Alaska’s resources and how they “share the wealth.” Thus, I am sure she is not being negative.
She also pals around with seccessionist parties and encourages them to keep up the good work. Their founder died in a sale of plastic explosives, so when she talks about pallin’ around, I am sure she does not mean anything by it.

Posted by: Mulvaney | October 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

MK:
“In court, they call those people witnesses.”
If so, in this case the witnesses’ canceled each other out, so no valid conclusion is possible, notwithstanding the credibility of the source.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Wondering:
” Only you can choose where you lower yourself to.”
And only you can choose the standards you judge people by.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

BillW,
Didn’t mean you personally. “Only a person can choose where you lower yourself to.”

Posted by: Wondering | October 31, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

BillW,
I am one of the most nonjudgemental people in the world. I take people on how people treat me and other people. Everyone should be able to express their opinion but some (as all of us can see in many of the above comments) just can’t do it without lowering themselves to the same as the ones they are ranting about.

Posted by: Wondering | October 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Wondering:
“Didn’t mean you personally”
Thanks, and I apologize. On a roll there…
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Well…this is what 6 colleges in 5 years gets you. Has anyone actually seen proof that she HAS a college degree?

Posted by: Famuan | October 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Just plain awesome. My side hurts from laughing.

Posted by: Doshii | October 31, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Obama could have pulled out all of her skeletons and John McCain’s but he didn’t.
People are sick and tired of the smear and fear tactics of the GOP. I pray that on Tuesday, we will have Obama in the WH to take us into the future.

Posted by: Jwench | October 31, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Wondering,
I agree, but that level is not sought after, let alone attained by many. That’s the ‘pity’ of the whole thing in this election.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

OK all you Obama supporters who disappeared, I’ll be leaving now so you can sneak back out from under your rocks.
.

Posted by: BillW | October 31, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

the polls are way off. *lol*
McCain is winning now!
It is over for the obamabots
might as well leave the sinking ship
like the good lil DemoRATS they are!

Posted by: RS | October 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

wow!! She is totally ignorant.
Criticism does not equal abridging someone’s free speech. You are free to speak whatever you want, just like everyone else, including the media, is free to speak their criticism about what you say.
If anything, what is a threat to the First Amendment is a politician (Palin) suggesting that the media expressing its opinion is unconstitucional. So, exactly the opposite of what this ignorant woman says.

Posted by: Diogo | October 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Well, she’s just a hockey mom. Or so she says.
You know, I don’t WANT a hockey mom for VP. I don’t want “just a common folk” sort of person. I want someone really smart. And knowledgeable. Who can spell Afghanistan right every time, can locate it on a map, understands the hodge-podge of Central Europe, “gets” economics and reads Samuelson for fun (even the sidebars) — I want a really really smart and capable person playing second fiddle, one who knows how to surround himself or herself with other smart and capable folks.
No hockey Moms. Haven’t we had enough AVERAGE??
Give me a hero. Or heroine.

Posted by: Cyn Mobley | October 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen, sister.
Palin is a whiner. The First Amendment doesn’t guarantee the right to lie with impunity. She just thinks she is above the law and no one should question her pronouncement because they come straight from God.

Posted by: Deb | October 31, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

MEDICAL RECORDS??????

Posted by: James | October 31, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The First Amendment is a restriction on government power, not the power of the press, you ignorant bumpkin.

Posted by: jacques | October 31, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Bill W.
Still won’t work. Paranoia won’t work. Bullying won’t work. Sarah Palin obviously doesn’t understand the very basics of the constitution, therefore, she has no business being the VP. You can slice it any way you like it, but it’s illogical and inane. I don’t care a whit about whatever else crap she has in her closets. Biden and Obama taught constitutionl law. It would be a bit like me getting into a bible verse quoting contest with a nun. I am not qualified to run a convent because I sat in church. As for the other regurgitated crap, Obama can, and has repeatedly, taken up for himself. I’ll do my part by casting a vote.

Posted by: Lydia | October 31, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Hi! I’m Sarah Palin. The First Amendment clearly states that Congress (aka media elites) cannot prohibit freedom of speech or press (aka gov. officials like me). So anyone that tries to make fun of me will get killed by my mob. I’m watching you! (wink)

Posted by: Sarah Palin | October 31, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I agree completely with TERESA RICHARDSON cuz there would be nothing covering a pregnancy!

Posted by: queek | October 31, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Haven’t we heard enough of “also” “too”
“John and I, we” “you betcha” and all the other squeaky grating grammatical screwups by this very inadequate ambitious religious nutcase from a state with a population less than Memphis. Tell everyone when that energy crisis solving natural gas pipeline will start construction when there is no contract for the natural gas that is supposed to run through it. It is 17 years out even if the energy companies agree to sell the gas to their Canadian competitor who Palin agreed to give the contract to. As in the VP debate, Palin is Bushlike in that she is very secretive answering only what she wants to answer including the medical records.
Enough of the vagueries and secrets!!

Posted by: ernieson | October 31, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Yesterday, when the cameras showed Cindy McCain and Joe “the plumber” getting off the McCain jet together, you could plainly see why she demanded Joe ride along. I think she was doing more than just shaving his head. Sometimes a plumber’s snake is just what is needed. Drill, baby drill.

Posted by: Ricardo | October 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Yeah, ABC, the scoop of the election would be for you to at least ask in a gentle way “So, when is the baby due?!!!!!!!!”

Posted by: kevin | October 31, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!
I TOLE HIM, YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON MICHELLE, BUT IT’S STILL A GORILLA!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I’m taking bets on how long after the election it will be before Bristol conveneniently, quietly and most allegedly miscarriages.

Posted by: frank burns | October 31, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Well – That did it. I’ve been going around saying that “Palin really isn’t as dumb as everyone thinks”, and holding my vote. That clinched it for me. Obama ’08 I guess.

Posted by: Clinched!!! | October 31, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

They’re like coals to Newcastle. (Look that one up if you’re not British.)

Posted by: Racists for McCain | October 31, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Yikes – THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS PROTECTION FROM GOVERNMENT against infringement of free speech. Everything else aside, the media isn’t the government. Aside from it being a silly argument, it’s legally very flawed. But she also doesn’t seem to understand that the VP is not part of the legislative branch either, so we’ll just mark this up to yet another reason she should not be VP – has no idea what the Constitution says or means.

Posted by: Theodore | October 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Only the Dumb, Rich and Racist support McCain.

Posted by: non-lemming | October 31, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Don’t question my patriotism!…this sounds like Palin might be a democrat!

Posted by: sara | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

I think it is pretty clear that Palin either had an abortion, or isn’t the mother of that baby. I’m hoping it’s the latter, but I don’t really think it is. Unless she is actually a man, I don’t think anything else in her medical records would prevent her from releasing them.
Still haven’t voted, but that’s pretty much the clincher for me.

Posted by: Formerly Nobama327 | October 31, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Why doesn’t she call in the ACLU?

Posted by: fregger | October 31, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

OBAMA IS A COMMON MONKEY.
WHAT PART OF THAT DON’T YOU GET?

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I just have to laugh at myself for thinking Palin/McCain was the right party. My new favorite was Palin criticizing Obama’s TV show for being not having many details. McCain in a debate said it was easy to fix Social Security. He failed to provide the details of why he has been in the Senate so long and didn’t bother to actually do it. I was once a huge McCain fan and can’t believe how much he has degraded himself with this campaign.

Posted by: Formerly Nobama327 | October 31, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

McCain = Bush
A failure at everything he’s done. Plus hes senile and has skin cancer.

Posted by: non-lemming | October 31, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

The commentary I just heard on MSNBC implying that Sarah Palin has the 1st ammendment backwards is false. I think the vast majority of people out there do not follow national and world political events until election time rolls around. If you think you can cram before the big test and offer up your critisizm to presidential candidates, you are sadly contributing to the problems in Washington. If you want to know what Sarah Palin is talking about read up on the “fairness doctrine.” The government has no place regulating the media. It is the job of educated citizens to look further than the objectives of the media.

Posted by: Jonathan of Victoria | October 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

OBAMMY IS DYING OF SICKLE CELL ANEMIA

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I read something the other day that said the negative coverage of Palin leans 9-1 over the positive coverage. Some people take that as media bias, some of us has realized that there isn’t really anything positive to say about her. They can either pretend she doesn’t exist, or report the news. Most of what is reported is simply words from her own mouth – I’m not sure how that is negative bias by anybody other than herself.

Posted by: Formerly Nobama327 | October 31, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Ya know if this woman actually understood the constitution of the United States it would amazing. Every time she opens her mouth stupid stuff comes out. McCain should just tell her to shut up and smile. I can’t beleive my party couldn’t find an intelligent woman to win the Hillary voters, instead of this moron.

Posted by: KentuckyConserative | October 31, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Sarah Palin = Democratic MVP!

Posted by: And the winner is..... | October 31, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Claification:
1. A letter summarizing your medical health does NOT = entire medical history. Just like a Certification of Live birth does not = a Vault birth certificate. Just sayin’…
2. It is more likely that Obama’s daughter’s don’t belong to him than the assertion that Trigg Palin doesn’t belong to Sarah. That’s just dopey.
By the way – I heard there is a new trend in the ‘Urbs fr naming baby girls “Epiphany”. As in, “… a light will fall upon you, and you will have an epiphany…”. They should give out dictionaries at those some of those rallies.

Posted by: Beth | October 31, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Hi I’m Granny Toot and I’m complete rasist idiot who dosn’t know my head from my a$$hole.

Posted by: Granny Toot | October 31, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Here’s how to pick your candidate. Read all the dribble from McCain supporters, and read the intelligent, well-informed things that Obama supporters have to say. Similar to watching the debates – listen for anything McCain or Palin say that resembles any sort of plan – oh wait, don’t do that, because it never happens.

Posted by: Formerly Nobama327 | October 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Posted by: Jonathan of Victoria | Oct 31, 2008 8:50:02 PM
If that is what she is talking about why doesn’t she come out and say it. Sounds like shes attacking the Media for expressing its free speech. We had this doctrine before and I thought it was great both sides of everything got equal air time on T.V. If I didn’t want to hear it I changed the channel. Whats so wrong about that? In times like these when the news is controlled by only one side I would welcome it.

Posted by: non-lemming | October 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

It is clear Palin has No f’ing clue, also, about the constitution….from the first ammendment to the functions of the VP, also. Ask her if God is mentioned in the Constitution (I’ll bet she says yes).
I am a devote CHRISTIAN Christian, you know, the kind that believes the Sermon on the Mount (all that Blessed are the peacemakers crap)is really the true salvation of humankind. I am insulted and afraid by this clearly incompetent.

Posted by: Little Jimmie G | October 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Posted by: Beth | Oct 31, 2008 8:56:25 PM
1. thanks for the clarification Sherlock but its more than Palin has done.
2. And you came to this assumption by….. pulling a crystal ball out of your a55?
Only the Dumb, Rich and Racist support McCain. I know which one your are.

Posted by: ur_a_bytch | October 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Sarah Palin release your medical records! Americans deserve to know the truth about Trig Palin!!!
MSM where are you on this????

Posted by: erod | October 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

My god this woman is shockingly dumb.

Posted by: Tony | October 31, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Posted by: non-lemming | Oct 31, 2008 9:07:34 PM
Well the headline on MSNBC is The Palin Problem. If you want to hear unbiased opinion of Sarah Palin, try looking into a different media outlet. It is hilarious that most of the people bashing Sarah Palin seem to support sen. Biden. The search for truth is usually a little harder than turning on the T.V.

Posted by: Jonathan of Victoria | October 31, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Sarah Palin is developmentally challenged. Her 83 full scale Wechsler I.Q. reported in her Wasilla High School records was labeled Dull Normal at that time and ,in fact, 83 was just slightly above the range labeled Borderline Retarded ( 70-80 I.Q. ). Her SAT scores were also similarly deficient,thus serving to confirm her sub-normal I.Q
In fact, Sarah’s resume reveals similar deficiencies in most every area of her life; 2.2 high school grade average, dropping out of college 5 times before finally receiving a degree after six years from the fifth college she attended,marrying an Alaska secessionist, supporting Kenyan witch doctors; corrupt,vindictive abuses of power during her mayorship and current governorship , erratic beliefs regarding the earth being but 6000 years old and Jesus co-existing with dinosaurs,etc.etc,etc.
The fact John McCain was so instantly captivated by her undoubtedly speaks to his having graduated 894th of 899 in his class and later having ” lost ” 5 aircraft he was piloting during his naval aviation career. ” Birds of a feather flock together “, ” it takes one to know one “, etc, etc, etc.

Posted by: Kevin | October 31, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Having devoted over 30 years of my life to the practice of psychology, I was shocked to discover the actual extent of Sarah Palin’s diminished intellect, although hardly surprised she is developmentally challenged. Her 83 full scale Wechsler I.Q. reported in her Wasilla High School records was labeled Dull Normal at that time and ,in fact, 83 was just slightly above the range labeled Borderline Retarded ( 70-80 I.Q. ). Her SAT scores were also similarly deficient,thus serving to confirm her sub-normal I.Q
In fact, Sarah’s resume reveals similar deficiencies in most every area of her life; 2.2 high school grade average, dropping out of college 5 times before finally receiving a degree after six years from the fifth college she attended,marrying an Alaska secessionist, supporting Kenyan witch doctors; corrupt,vindictive abuses of power during her mayorship and current governorship , erratic beliefs regarding the earth being but 6000 years old and Jesus co-existing with dinosaurs,etc.etc,etc.
The fact John McCain was so instantly captivated by her undoubtedly speaks to his having graduated 894th of 899 in his class and later having ” lost ” 5 aircraft he was piloting during his naval aviation career. ” Birds of a feather flock together “, ” it takes one to know one “, etc, etc, etc.

Posted by: Kevin | October 31, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

The way the Candidates run their campaign should be an indication of how they will govern our country.
It should be obvious who has done a better job, and who should be the one to reside in the White House.
(Excercising my First Amendment Rights)

Posted by: SY | October 31, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Who said I find answers only on tv? I rarely watch it. I like the internet better. I formed my opinions from what they have said and the questions they wont answer not what tv or the net says. Whats so funny about Biden?
He is qualified to lead Palin isn’t. Hes done tons of interviews and has screwed up a few times. Palin has done a hand full and screwed them all up. Whats your point?

Posted by: non-lemming | October 31, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I project that the extreme Media bias which has been DOCUMENTED and reported in this 2008 election process..(the recent study by Pew Research Center)is not going to “go away” for the liberal mainstream media. In the study 70% of the public believe the media is biased toward Obama and want him to win the election. They have misused their profession in an attempt to sway this election. They have tried to destroy Sarah Palin, but have been unsuccessful. There are too many people who see through the dishonesty…I believe the future coverage of elections will no longer be controlled by the liberal mainstream media…transformation will come…because 70% of the public no longer trusts them to be the impartial, unbiased news source.

Posted by: equalityrpt | October 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

If this doesn’t beat all…And you would think she couldn’t rank any lower intellectually when you thought she must have a brain like an Alaskan jellyfish. Sincere apologies to the jellyfish!

Posted by: Charity begins at home | October 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Her 1st amendment rights are NOT being infringed. This is just another case of Caribou Barbie flaunting her ignorance. You BETCHA! Very much like that imbecile GRANNY TOOT.
It is unfortunate for those of that ilk – ignorant, fearful, hateful, racist, purposely uninformed – that they don’t realize the (extreme) stupidity of their comments makes clear, to those of us who paid attention through at least twelve years of schooling, they are unqualified to comment authoritatively on current events. Never mind holding public office of any rank.
They would do their cause a better service by keeping the inane comments to themselves.
But they won’t. They can’t help themselves. They will continue to turn the tide toward Obama by sending undecided voters away from their camp with blindered moronic comments; the verbal diarhea that is the auditory excreta of their infantile “mental” processes.
Who in their right mind would want to be associated with that moronic bunch of idiots?
Cling to your hate GRANNY TOOT. It’s all you’ve got left.
GO SARAH! GO! back to alaska. soon.

Posted by: GRAMPY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

“Face it .. the media picked their man Obama and they will slime whoever gets in their way and ignore anything Obama does.”
Sarahcuda is self-sliming, she doesn’t need any assistance from the media, the left, or anyone else. Why can’t you sacks of milorganite get that through your frackin skulls?

Posted by: spudnik | October 31, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

So to recap:
Palin doesn’t want a free press and she wants to limits the first amendment rights of journalists.

Posted by: Kuni Leml | October 31, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I looked up stupid in the dictionary and there was a picture of Palin…picking her nose. Can you imagine if this absolute numbskull had to take over the reigns and become President?

Posted by: Marty | October 31, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Sarah Palin can’t take criticism. She fires those who disagree with her and if she had her way she would silence the media too. In her dreams she is a dictator wearing Prada.

Posted by: Mary | October 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

I can tell this is an ABC faux news website because many of the posted comments are from right wing hatemongers who are so dumb they cannot spell, read or write. All they know how to do is name call instead of posting intelligent logical comments or arguments. Its really funny to read this garbage.

Posted by: johnny boy | October 31, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

hahahahahahahah……I love it when right-wing fools whine like bia%#$#@!

Posted by: Jimmy Corn | October 31, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Doesn’t Palin get it backwards? The first amendment is supposed to protect the right of the press and the people to criticize government without fear of official reprisals. It is not about the right of government to prosecute the press for reporting on governmental actions. That was called “political libel” and the jury of John Peter Zenger, represented by the other Alexander Hamilton, established that political libel runs against American ideals.

Posted by: Pete Wanger | October 31, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Each day that Sarah Mooseburger talks, she further impeaches whatever credibility that she had before, which is diminutive at best. She will be a footnote in history although her arrogance will propel her to seek further ambitions. She will have to go back to Alaska and fight all of her enemies out there.
Palin/Joe the Plumber 2012…..it is the best that the GOP can do.

Posted by: geniusjoe46 | October 31, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Jeremy’s right: Obama released JUST a one-page letter from his doctor INSTEAD OF HIS MEDICAL RECORDS which is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of the secrets that Obama “hides”

Posted by: tom | October 31, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Palin is a sad joke, an airhead, and without question, just plain stupid … and you can’t fix ‘stupid’.

Posted by: wayne | October 31, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Everybody says that the media is biased, but nobody ever tells me what the reason for this intrinsic bias is. Fox News I can understand, but what about all of the others? They are owned by Wall Street which is pretty conservative.

Posted by: geniusjoe46 | October 31, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

And another thing … she can’t really see Russia from her house … whose she trying to kid …

Posted by: Dr. Wayne | October 31, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Actually, it doesn’t sound like the Fairness Doctrine at all.
How is the press commenting on, what they perceive to be her negative attacks, infringing upon her right to speak? The fairness doctrine was to try and keep news fair, so that people could hear both sides. I don’t understand what you mean by that. There is no fairness doctrine now as of August 1987. Basically, she can say what she wants, and the press, through their freedoms, can respond how they want. Both are protected under the 1st amendment. The only way to keep the press from commenting would be to bring BACK the Fairness Doctrine, so that they could be policed by the government. I’m still at a loss as to how the press violates her 1st amendment rights. She says, “If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations,” Palin told host Chris Plante, “then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.”
They aren’t policing her, and the press is independent, not part of the government at all. So, how is the government infringing on her right to free speech by the media acting on their right to free press? I don’t understand your argument. The media hasn’t done anything to convince me. I’ve watched her rallies.

Posted by: Lydia | October 31, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Not only is this woman a “WHACK JOB” – she’s HIGHLY dangerous!
We all must PRAY that she gets no where near the White House and THE BUTTON . . .
H O L Y SMOKES . . .

Posted by: susanstudioz | October 31, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

palin has lost it….proving that she is not capable…ever…of serving in the administrative branch. yikes.

Posted by: hank jr | October 31, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Posted by: equalityrpt | Oct 31, 2008 9:52:17 PM
I’m sure you were not b!tching and crying when the MSM was in love with Bush. Now to clear up the sh!t you sling. The latest Pew weekly News Interest Index survey, conducted October 17-20 shows the tide has turned on McCain. His poll numbers are down then he went on to negative campaigning. So just like in real life Karma is a bitch. Here’s the link so everyone can read and form your own opinion.
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1003/joe-the-plumber

Posted by: non-lemming | October 31, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Well susanstudioz, thank God, she seems to be taking care of that all by herself. The more she speaks, the deeper the hole gets. She seems to suffer from the open mouth insert foot disease every time the cameras are rolling. Vote guys, vote!

Posted by: Lydia | October 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

In three words: Un. Be. Lievable.
Sarah Palin simply does not understand the plain sense of the First Amendment.
Can you imagine her swearing to “uphold and protect” the Constitution?
It boggles the mind.
When will decent, intelligent Republicans take their party back from the faction of Know-Nothings who have hijacked the GOP?

Posted by: David de Kanter Arndt | October 31, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

reddog has asked about Senator Obama’s medical records?
HIghlights:
*Triglycerides of 44(normal under 150), cholesterol 173 (normal under 200), HDL 68 (normal over 40), and LDL 96 (normal under 130). Chem 24, urinalysis and CBC were normal, PSA was 0.6, very good. An EKG was normal.
Does that help you feel better? I doubt it – so whats your point?

Posted by: deb | October 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Palin needs to stop sniffing the gas fumes from the camapign bus. She is a laugh a minute and what is sad is that there people out there who would fall for this crap. The media has given her a fair shake. She is the bobble head who could not even remember one newspaper or magazine she reads. You have one chance to make a first impression in many Americans minds. HER rights are not in jeopardy, this is just another fear smear tatic on the Republicans part.

Posted by: francheska ;-) | October 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Bludgeoned brain dead little seal pup, politicians rarely sue for libel and slander. It is an established fact that they are expected to indure unfair criticism, inuendo and unsubstantiated accusations.
Are you deluding on McCain’s Ambien, again?

Posted by: KEVIN SCHMIDT | October 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I forgot to mention: when Sarah was pimping her kids tonight in their halloween costumes, I noticed she dressed the baby in a Dumbo costume. WT He!!
This, on top of her recent comments denigrating research (by those elitist, book lernd scintist’s wit’ all that there book lernin’ an’ like an’ such an’ fantsy DIPLOMAS like that htere) into the DNA of fruit flies, solidifies my understanding of her as a dangerously ambitious dolt who will say anything to appeal to the base instincts of those most like her: the hateful, ignorant sects who believe there is no point in caring for the planet, or those who do not share their rapturous beliefs. After all, what’s the point? They aren’t saved and won’t be saved.
Research into the DNA of fruit flies has contributed incredibly to our understanding of the causes of Down’s Syndrome in the human species. Something she has recently been giving lip service to.
After doing her best to deny benefits to those families having to deal with it.
But I guess what she thinks works for her is making fun of people trying to make things better for people.
But now the shoe is on her foot.
Something there is here that stinks, I think.
Must be a rat. One of the many she’s eaten to enhance her appeal to her adoring public.

Posted by: GRAMPY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Can anyone, I mean anymore, honestly say that they think Palin has the intelligence, integrity, diplomatic prowess and steadiness to be President? Please, don’t allow this “commoner” who despises intellect to be a heartbeat away.
If we love this country and this planet we cannot let that happen.
Please America make sure you Vote
Obama!

Posted by: Marty | October 31, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

OMG I’ve gotten addicted to this idiot’s daily dumb. What am I going to do when they lose?

Posted by: Chandu | October 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

It’s funny to read liberal’s comments because you can see exactly how confused they are. They even contradict themselves in their replies. Look, even President Clinton really likes and admires Sarah Palin and her husband Todd and is very likely voting for her — Don’t be so surprised – he’s a Rhodes Scholar — that translates into being very smart! During his interview, he could not mask his admiration for both of them. Re medical records – Obama’s doctor sent a one-page doctor’s note and his birth certificate is sealed from the public now. He won’t even let any one see his thesis from Columbia or his college scores. On the other hand, Palin who has had five children which translates to a file a foot high and McCain and Biden whose files are equally voluminous are releasing their files. Palin is sharp – raised by her parents who are teachers. She gave her speech at the convention flawlessly even though the script kept scrolling when she had to pause for audience applause. If you think she is stupid, you haven’t listen to her speak, you may have heard snippets taken out of context — you know the stuff that always seems to happen to Obama. Speaking of Obama – if you are voting for him and he wins — thanks for making America the butt of world ridicule. Without a teleprompter and someone else making his decisions for him, he can’t say anything but uh, uh, uh — or maybe you missed that David Letterman show! Hillary reminded us that instead of voting yes or no on his Illinois senate bills, he just voted present. In the us senate, he did not even vote 80% of the time – check out his voting record Or, are you just voting for him just because he has you hypnotized by his mesmerizing voice? He never even showed up for his own committee meetings. When he showed up at all, he was always late. Even France’s president has made it very clear how dangerous his immaturity is. Obama must not have had his puppet master around to tell him exactly what to say. Vote for a real man who will do the right thing for you – he won’t take advantage of you. It is about time someone decided to cut government spending. If you worked where I did and saw the waste I saw, you would refuse to pay any taxes at all.

Posted by: MzDakota | October 31, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Have no fear Chandu. Palin is so dumb she’ll probably continue to campaign until she’s told stop. Can’t you see her going to an event in December and no one shows up? I can hear her now say, ” Oh, the campaigns over? Hmmm, never mind.”

Posted by: Marty | October 31, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

The scary thing is that she truly believes she is NOT running a negative campaign against Obama. Even if she were running a clean campaign, how is anyone violating her first amendment rights? In all seriousness, I would not be surprised if she has narcissistic personality disorder in her medical records.
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/narcissistic-personality-disorder/DS00652

Posted by: Elizabeth | October 31, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Here is a scary thought for Halloween night……years from now, just imagine this: The Sarah Palin Presidential Library.

Posted by: shockolit | October 31, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Wow, thanks for the link Elizabeth. Read this:
Narcissistic personality disorder symptoms may include:
* Believing that you’re better than others
* Fantasizing about power, success and attractiveness
* Exaggerating your achievements or talents
* Expecting constant praise and admiration
* Believing that you’re special
* Failing to recognize other people’s emotions and feelings
* Expecting others to go along with your ideas and plans
* Taking advantage of others
* Expressing disdain for those you feel are inferior
* Being jealous of others
* Believing that others are jealous of you
* Trouble keeping healthy relationships
* Setting unrealistic goals
* Being easily hurt and rejected
* Having a fragile self-esteem
* Appearing as tough-minded or unemotional
Although some features of narcissistic personality disorder may seem like having confidence or strong self-esteem, it’s not the same. Narcissistic personality disorder crosses the border of healthy confidence and self-esteem into thinking so highly of yourself that you put yourself on a pedestal. In contrast, people who have healthy confidence and self-esteem don’t value themselves more than they value others.
When you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may come across as conceited, boastful or pretentious. You often monopolize conversations. You may belittle or look down on people you perceive as inferior. You may have a sense of entitlement. And when you don’t receive the special treatment to which you feel entitled, you may become very impatient or angry. You may also seek out others you think have the same special talents, power and qualities — people you see as equals. You may insist on having “the best” of everything — the best car, athletic club, medical care or social circles, for instance.
But underneath all this grandiosity often lies a very fragile self-esteem. You have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism. You may have a sense of secret shame and humiliation. And in order to make yourself feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself appear better.

Posted by: Tim S | October 31, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

This is just another example of Sen. Mccain’s running mate being completely unprepared to not only be vice-president but to also interpret the COnstitution of the United States. Our first amendment rights were put in place by some very wise men to keep dissent from being stifled by a repressive government. Mrs. Palin would do well to remember that the first amendment was put in place to protect the media from people like her and not to protect her from the media be it print or electronic. It’s hard to believe she has a major in journalism. I would think that at least one of those five colleges she attended would have given her a primer on the first amendment.

Posted by: Carson Stidom | October 31, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Please don’t let this airhead ruin our country.

Posted by: Eric | October 31, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

I must say if you think Sarah Palin is ready to be VP then you mind as well say it’s okay to drink and drive. Its sad that so many republicans knows shes imcompitent yet they lie and say she’s ready. Think George Bush who wasn’t that bright look where we are now. Insanity repeating to same mistakes expecting different results!

Posted by: Kelly Jackson | October 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

@MzDakota: Dolt.
President Clinton showed his political astuteness when he did not decry Barbie Moosehead’s obvious idiocy. He is, if nothing else, the consummate political animal, and realized pointing out her inadequacies would shift some of the undecided voters into her camp.
At the time he made his comments regarding her, squirrel brains like you were still sporting big wood for her, and if he said what he realy thought it would have been counterproductive.
Now that the blood has rushed back to the collective grey matter, your girl doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in Arizona.
And BTW, your descriptive above fits Dubyuh to a “T”.
But you’ll never admit it.
Cling on, moron! Now, go look for some more nuts. Maybe they’ll listen to you rant.

Posted by: GRAMPY TOOT | October 31, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Man, all this obsession with Gov. Palin’s reproductive system and capabilities…pretty darn sick.
Reminds me a little of those Jack the Ripper profiles.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 31, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Obama f*rts and snores, note.

Posted by: Jack The Ripper | October 31, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

“all this obsession with Gov. Palin’s reproductive system and capabilities…pretty darn sick.”
Only from Obama supporters… Typical of their mentality.

Posted by: Jack The Ripper | November 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

@GOP:
comment does not compute.
@JtheRipper:
Barbie toots.
And snores.
Like a…wait for it…
moose.

Posted by: GRAMPY | November 1, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Obama missed his calling as a preacher man. Wright couldn’t hold him a light.

Posted by: Jack The Ripper | November 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Also, I don’t get this constantly calling her an ‘idiot’…I suppose they feel if they say it enough it becomes true.
I don’t think Mr. Obama is a genius, but I wouldn’t insult him by calling him an ‘idiot’, or ‘stupid’. I just think he’s extremely evasive about where he’s coming from, and comes across as being arrogant, though some can argue that that is actually self-confidence, and I could see that side of things.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | November 1, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Every time she opens her mouth I am more and more convinced that she – and anyone who agrees with her – is a complete and utter moron.

Posted by: Lynn | November 1, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

She has a perserve interpretation of the constitution. And she has the gall to label other people “anti-american.” There is nothing as dangerous as ignorance combined with arrogance. Just like W.

Posted by: goshbiz | November 1, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

If you want to give away your own PB&J sandwich to a friend of yours who forgot their lunch, that’s cool. It’s called charity. It’s the conservative thing to do.
If the teacher comes and takes half of your sandwich and decides to give it, agaist your will, to the bullies that tease you endlessly about your dumbo ears, that’s socialism.
You don’t want me to give my money to others that I think need it. You want to tax me and “spread the wealth” to those people from whom you can bribe a vote.

Posted by: Mark Garnett | November 1, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

So, a negative attack isn’t negative when Sarah Palin makes it. And her right to free speech is violated when the press doesn’t report what she wants reported. Could it be any clearer that Sarah Palin has an out-of-control nixonesque ego? I thoroughly detest this woman, and haven help this country if by some horrible chance she’s actually elected to office. None of us will be safe until she’s sent packing back to socialist Alaska.

Posted by: Lou | November 1, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

The more I hear Sarah Palin, the more I’m convinced we ought to go ahead and let Alaska secede.

Posted by: Fergus Johnson NC | November 1, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Dear Sarah Palin,
where is my rebate check from that Alaskan Oil?
sincerly, Joe the Plumber alias wanna be wanna be
john mccain’s stooge

Posted by: beware of the New World Order | November 1, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

The way the dems on her act so nasty about Gov. Palin with the name calling. I’m happy to say that I’m was a Hillary supporter and I’m voting for McCain. The dems treat woman like nothing and I’m tired of it.
I see Gov. Palin as a strong person for taking this cr*p!
I know what she is saying… If how they treat Joe the Plumber is a sign of things to come I’m scared!

Posted by: Gigi | November 1, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I’m scared and I can’t explain why. I’m scared of anything that’s different, even though my life is a miserable hell without a job, education or health care. But the republicans sure are great at explaining who I ought to blame for my situation, and that makes it easy for me. So I vote republican even though once they get into office they give all the breaks to rich people and big oil companies – but at least they keep it real simple for people like me!

Posted by: Gigi | November 1, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Just to make my point even more clear – sharing is un-American. Helping the poor is un-American. Our government is not there to help people, it’s there to support big oil companies and people who are already rich. Providing health care, education and tax breaks for underserving poor people and minorities is downright unpatriotic. And anyone who says otherwise is a marxist socialist muslim terrorist who hates good americans like Sam (I mean Joe) the Not-plumber, who patriotically refuses to pay taxes in protest of insidious left-wing programs like the national defense, police and fire services, bridges and roads that don’t collapse, and social security.

Posted by: Mark Garnett | November 1, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

She obviously doesn’t listen to Rwanda Hutu Radio, Savage, Limbaugh and the like.
What a pity plea.

Posted by: ANS | November 1, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

What do you expect from a pageant queen? Sarah is just another airhead and an ignoramus to boot. Not all pageant queens are this dumb, but what we have in Sarah is an incurious sociopath running for one of the highest offices in the land without the faintest idea of what the job entails. She really doesn’t get it.

Posted by: Emilio | November 1, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

The press is biased against Palin! Who could possibly be expected to answer impossible questions like ‘What newspaper to you read?’ and ‘Tell us about one decision you made as commander of the Alaska national guard?’ NOBODY could respond to hardballs like those. And if you want MORE proof the mainstream media is biased, how come they don’t report Palin’s lies about her opponents as truth? I mean, don’t they know that when Sarah Palin lies, it’s NOT A LIE! How dare the press freely report what she says? It’s downright unconstitutional!

Posted by: Not So Grand Old Party | November 1, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Lumping Khalidi in with Ayers and Wright mindlessly makes Palin as dumb as she looks. That’s pretty hard to do. My First Amendment rights are being taken away by…the media! Waaahhhhh! Hold me Toddy…(sniffle)

Posted by: Chuck Wood | November 1, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

For a working/middle class man or woman casting their vote for a Republican candidate is masochistic behavior because they are enabling their tormentors. Read my lips working/middle class people, Republicans are your enemies and they will take everything from you, even your life.

Posted by: Emilio | November 1, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Read at Foxnews ABC had apologized for Vargas interview error in reporting Palin bid for 2012….did I miss that apology here at ABC NEWS??

Posted by: equalityrpt | November 1, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

The Constitution says whatever Sarah wants it to say. I wish Obama would dust off one of his University of Chicago law lectures and explain this magical feature of the constitution to voters.

Posted by: Valkyrie | November 1, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Palin is the reason her son has down syndrome.Her Doctors advised her sac was leaking and not to fly.Yet she did anyway insisting she couldn’t miss a business meeting.It was covered when she 1st got the nomination. I could never vote for a Dem or Rep.woman who did this.

Posted by: Didi | November 1, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

You guys are all a bunch of idiots. If Obama gets elected you will all regret being so stupid. I can only hope you people will start to use your brains and look at what is right in front of your faces. Please stop closing your minds and look at all the facts before it is to late.

Posted by: worried | November 1, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Those high priced consultants running the McPain campaign should be sued for doing an ineffective job. With all the right-wing echo chamber and their zealots behind them this campaign sure does look disorganized. Perhaps if they had some people with actual community organizing background on their side they would appear a little more coherent. Repeatedly we hear that John McCain is tested, in conjunction with his being prepared to assume the office of POTUS, can someone tell me what those tests were? As far as I can tell John McCain is not the war hero he’d like us all to believe, he is not an honorable man as one can see from his ditching of his first wife and the Keating Savings and Loan scandal. John McCain is just a tired old man, who like his buddy GWB, has a father problem. Neither of these two losers can rise to the achievements of their respective fathers. Both make the case for the state taxing inheritance to the hilt; as underperforming offsprings of successful people they believe they are entitled to a position without earning it.

Posted by: Emilio | November 1, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Perhaps the reason why Sarah Palin’s medical records aren’t being made public is that there is no record of her giving birth to the child she claims to be the mother of.

Posted by: Emilio | November 1, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Didi,
I completely agree with your point about how foolish it was for Palin to fly when she was in labor. For the record, I would like to point our that Down Syndrome is not caused by anything a woman does or fails to do during her pregnancy. It occurs at conception because of an extra chromosome.
Nonetheless, Palin was very lucky that nothing happened to her or the baby because of her foolish decision.

Posted by: Elizabeth | November 1, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

“Palin Fears Media Threaten Her First Amendment Rights”
And she wants to run for President?

Posted by: tonyj | November 1, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Wow, check out a website called obamamustsee.com
I think it speaks volumes!

Posted by: Maria | November 1, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Since John McCain did not vet Sarah Palin, it’s up to us. T
oday Sarah got a pop quiz on the Constitution, and she scored a big red F.
I guess the journalism major was not paying attention in school when they talked about the rights of the press.
Send her back to Alaska with a copy of the Constitution, it’s pretty clear she’s never even read it.

Posted by: Fran Taylor | November 1, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

I voted for Hillary and she won my state. Then she lost and I too said I’m voting for McCain. Then you listen to Obama and you realize why he won the Primary. For all these people saying I’m a female who voted for Hillary, and now I’m voting for McCain, I call BS. I don’t believe it or
you. No self-respecting Democratic female would do it to themselves or their children. I admit maybe 10 people total, the rest are Republican operatives.

Posted by: ans | November 1, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

If she bothered to read the Constitution then she would know that the first amendment protects the speech of the press and people against government. Not the other way around.

Posted by: Girl28 | November 1, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

God, what an idiot. I can’t wait until this election is over and I don’t have to listen to this garbage anymore.

Posted by: Big Ideas | November 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Palin has been a desperate muckraker and she doesn’t like being called on it. Perhaps she will have to dig deeper to the days – when by Obama’s own admission he may have shared his peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with his associates

Posted by: anth L | November 1, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

How right wing is Palin? I keep trying to call the ‘bottom’ and she keeps getting lower. Now she wants to censure the Press! She’s trying to ‘scare’ the press into not questioning her – what, is she going to sue the press now for alleged infringements to her Ammendment Rights? She accuses a Presidential Candidate of “Palling around with terrorists” and insists that she has the right to ‘call him out’ in regards to her version of the character of the people he has sat on committee meetings with – and the Press isn’t ‘allowed’ to question that? Do you mind if I question, Sarah? The guy you refer to – Ayres – is not a convicted terrorist. That’s Number 1. Number 2? Obama has no close friendship with the guy. Am I allowed to say that, Sarah? If you come to ‘Power’ … will you find a way to shut all of us up? Will we all have to be frightened of who our neighbours are, who we sit on committees with, who we like, who we don’t like?? Would that make you happy, Sarah?? Yes, I think it would. You really are so much more Right Wing than I ever imagined. You will never achieve a position of power in the White House. I doubt if Alaska even wants you anymore – if Alaska ever did. Maybe they didn’t ‘really know’ you, Sarah? Well, they do now. We all do. You are a bad Joke. We wont make you shut up – that takes away our freedom. But, BY CHRIST, we are allowed to question you! The American People will “call you out” on your performance – November 4. The ignorant GOP base can not save you.

Posted by: chester burns | November 1, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

..and Joe the plumber. The Media have really failed big time in finding the association between McCain and this Joe. Either their was an agreement between the two that Joe might receive numerous references on a Presidential debate or there was not. The media haven’t even bothered to try and find out.
Instead Joe lives like a Unicorn. In MY dreams, I may wish to live to eighty, but in reality I do have life insurance. Joe would have been better off with an Obama tax cut, whilst his dreams could remain intact.
Still every individual has the freedom to proceed as they wish within the law – but Palin sounds a little twisted on her First Amendment rights.

Posted by: anth L | November 1, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Seen from Europe Mrs.Palin is one SCARY lady!

Posted by: greta | November 1, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

Gawd almighty, Sarah is an embarrassment to us women. She shoots off her mouth without taking much time to think because she loves to hear herself talk. She obviously doesn’t like to be criticized. I guess she thinks she’s an empress not to be questioned. What a fool.

Posted by: Kristen | November 1, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

What a freaking baby! I can’t believe people respect this woman so much. She picks fights then plays victim. She bullies subordinates and abuses her power then says she doesn’t.
Go play crazy somewhere else. We’re all sold out here.

Posted by: Keith | November 1, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

Reddog and others: The press really should have investigated AYERS,KAHLIDI, etc, including Todd Palin and his membership with the group that wants Alaska to secede from the USA and become a separate country. Sarah has spoken at their venue and sent recorded messages to their gatherings. In addition we would have known MUCH sooner that John McCain’s Republican Institute had given KAHLIDI a grant of at least $450K, the same group to which AYERS’ group gave a grant nine times SMALLER!!!! See when you big mouths open up, then you get caught with your pants down. Also those who live in glass houses should not throw so many stones. I wish the press also would have really hit (1) McCain’s history of womanizing (Palin likely got his “shorts” in a wad for the nth time); (2)his Black cousins in Carroll County,MS (by the way his brother Joe attends the family reunions; ‘ole John refuses to acknowledge their existence); (3) his long record of voting against veterans benefits of all kind; and (4) his numerous anti-civil rights votes, some of which actually benefit WHITE WOMEN. It is so sad that people do not educate themselves, rather than blindly following the party propaganda. There are so many electronic sources at your fingertips like the Congressional Record, Library of Congress, etc. But that takes time — reading, thinking, etc.; dumbos do not have time for that because it is much easier and much less novel to spew unsubstantiated ignorance. The strategists know how to put it out there knowing that there are many empty vessels who will suck it up and spew it like geysers.

Posted by: LadyAfrica | November 1, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am

What a dumb Bit** That is what the first amendment is. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press. How could anyone even a republican vote for her. She is the biggest threat to freedom of speech and freedom than George Bush.

Posted by: Shawn | November 1, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

Concerning the baby: Sarah’s story is that:(1) her water broke; (2) she delivered a 30-minute talk to a meeting of the National Republican Governors; and (3)then flew 11-12 hours back to Alaska to have the baby. Any woman whose water breaks cannot do all of that. She also did not tell anyone she was pregnant until the 7th month but her pictures look like they do now. Compare pictures of her when she really was pregnant. Meanwhile Bristol transferred from Wasilla High to Anchorage High but stayed out of school for 5 months with a really bad case of “mono.” In addition there is no record at the Wasilla Hospital of a birth on the date that has been claimed. You didn’t hear from me — look it up.
In addition, Sarah Palin has a big mouth but she really is a very ignorant person. It is so clear, compare her to any woman on the political stage. Of course Palin and Bachmann of Minnesota are twins. Degrees and positions are not mitigating factors for ignorance; they never are and never will be.

Posted by: LadyAfrica | November 1, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

My apologies to retarded people everywhere for lumping Palin with you, but she is retarded. She possesses the mental political capacity of a first grader.

Posted by: David | November 1, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am

make it stop please!
http://i33.tinypic.com/2dt80uh.jpg

Posted by: zimi... | November 1, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am

At time I can’t stand the press but they are the only barrier to keeping the government honest. Palin is Cheney in a dress. She wants to shine in the public arena than like Biden, Obama and McCain she is being asked stuff questions. She only wants to talk to the right wing media. She is a journalism major even if it took her 5 or 6 colleges. She knows how to use the media.

Posted by: anna | November 1, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

don’t whine palin, file a lawsuit. if palin has specific evidence, she should file a lawsuit like the one filed against dole for slander. palin has yet to shed tears but she sure can whine. wonder her medical records are that she said she would release earlier this past week?

Posted by: Lawrence | November 1, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

Witches, demons, religious fanaticism, fear and divisiveness. This is what Sarah Palin is feeding the American people. She will twist and tear the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to suit her ultra-radical, crypto-Christianist, right-wing agenda.
She doesn’t pal around with terrorists. She IS a terrorist.
Learn about SP’s covert apocalyptic agenda at:

Posted by: Mishkin-Fishkin | November 1, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Anybody ever hear of “The Night of The Long Knives”? Think we can do it again… to Republicans?

Posted by: Tom | November 1, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Hey reddog- they didn’t need hundreds of reporters to learn that John McCain gave five times as much in donations to Kahlidi then did Obama. So. Kahlidi and McCain have past associations. Do I need to mention G.Gordon Liddy? You know, McCains pal who advocated killing ATF agents on his radio show! Unlike Mr Ayers, who was convicted of NOTHING, G. Gordon Liddy is a convicted FELON!!

Posted by: cab | November 1, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Sarah Palin,
What you are saying is not the problem. The media is just reporting what we the votes have known since McCain picked you. You are not prepared to be VP and of course you lack experience to replace McCain. That is the problem. Do not blame the media. In addition, we are tired of the Bush administration. We are spending billions of $$$ a month in the illegal Iraq war. We are in this economic disaster. We are unable to pay health care premiums because the insurance companies work with the Republicans to pass regulations so that they can make money. They say we live in the best country on earth. Give me a break. We cannot afford health care in this country and this is the best country? Obama will change that. Vote for Obama and we will change this country for the best and the world.

Posted by: Patty | November 1, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Not that it has anything to do with Palin thinking the First Amendment is freedom FROM the press, but maybe Obama just doesn’t HAVE any medical records to release. He’s only four years older than me. Here’s my medical records: got strep throat in 2004, otherwise healthy. I’ve seen my medical records, it’s just a folder with my name on it, and 2 sheets of paper. One is about the time I came in with strep, and the other is just a list of all the years I came in for a checkup and there was nothing wrong with me.

Posted by: Miss J | November 1, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Who ever wins the election,there is one thing to remember.We all live on this small patch of earth called USA. Remember the first word “UNITED” and no matter what our heated opinions are,in the end We will work side by side, drive side by side, attend houses of faith, side by side,attend funerals and weddings and experience new births side by side.
Elections come and go,and for a time Washington
becomes so corrupt the citizens, rise and make a stand by voting and steam clean the corruption (for the most part) away. Its the small dirt under Washington’s fingernails that remains. Gradually that will build up and then the corruption will return with new faces, and, dark agendas. Then the process will start all over again. Remember your basic history lessons, this has been the way of the world since government was invented.
Sadly all the finger pointing and blaming, does nothing but insure the Merry Go Round keeps revolving, and is well oiled with our angry emotions, and fear. One day, perhaps in our lifetime, logical choices based on compassion, and reason, will slow, or even stop this Merry go round. Then we and the world could see and think clearly, and not in a spinning dizzy state.
Think about it folks.

Posted by: Vonorn | November 1, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Hi MissJ. Obama has released his medical records – he released them weeks ago. McCain, Biden and Obama have all released their medical records. I didn’t think this aspect of the campaign was any big deal. Isn’t it just to ensure that the candidates are all in good health? I don’t know what Palin is ‘frightened’ about … I don’t like Palin, I don’t like her at all. But if she, or any other candidate, has something in their medical records which does not relate to their current state of health? Then they shouldn’t have to release that aspect. All that is required, surely, is a clean bill of health from the doctor. Anything that could potentially embarrass any of them is not warranted.

Posted by: chester burns | November 1, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I am afraid PALIN threatens American RIGHTs.

Posted by: Jonathan K | November 1, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

hmm, Obama released his medical files in the primary election, a long time ago. So that still begs the question, where’s Palin’s?

Posted by: antmo | November 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Ms Palin says Obama was born in Hawaii not America.

Posted by: WDRussell | November 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

reddog, she is dum by any standards. Do you listen to her? Did you read the article? She got the first amendment TOTALLY BACKWARDS! Stop loving her because of her looks and hating Obama because of his! What the heck is going on in this country?

Posted by: antmo | November 1, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

If 40% of America still support this woman, then we are no longer the greatest country in the world.

Posted by: antmo | November 1, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Dan, you know McCain kicked reporters off of his plane weeks ago, right? Also, it’s a PRIVATE PLANE. Private, get it?

Posted by: antmo | November 1, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I’m a Christian Conservative–and Sarah Palin doesn’t speak for me–and she doesn’t speak for Jesus either. My first impression of her was that she was probably the most vicious girl in high school — the one who liked to pick on the kid with the funny name — and especially liked to do it when others were around to go along with her.
Everything she’s said has increased that impression tenfold. And if this should be laid at the vicious speechwriters behind her–well, then it certainly doesn’t say much about her character either.
Though the articles I’ve read seem to confirm that lying and scheming to get ahead are a firm part of her modus operandi.
The October surprise this year should have been a full-scale expose on her ties with the Alaska Independence Party and what they’ve done to further her career — getting it off the ground in Wasilla and helping to get her elected. She attended their conference in 1994–then they helped get her elected by spreading lies about the incumbent mayor–Joel Stein. She attended their conference in 2000, and then again in 2006–this time as a SPEAKER (wish we had the video of THAT!). In November, 2007, Dexter Clark is at the Secessionists Conference in Chattanooga, bragging about how Sarah was a member, but she went along to get along and joined the Republican party before she ran for mayor. Finally–just this year, she tapes a message to their convention and tells them to keep up the good work!
I can’t think of any other Governor that would even have the inclination to go to these people’s meetings–much less give them legitimacy. These are claims about “gee, she knows somebody who did something 40 years ago”–these are HER own actions that she should be held accountable for.
I think if Jesus came in and watched her rally and how she lies without blinking and slanders, He’d say, “you know them by their fruits”.

Posted by: ThinkFirstThenVote | November 1, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Watch Farrakhans rally for Obama.
It is SCARY.
And you would want Obama for President.
Run from this guy.

Posted by: al from nj | November 1, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

For the sake of Palin and her fellow right-wingers who feel deeply victimized by the fact that the press can criticize them, I propose the formation of a Wingnut Party, whose members are never criticized in any way but are not allowed to appear on any ballot or be covered by any members of the media. They could secede from the Union and we’d never know it, and they should probably go ahead and do so if they feel that our Bill of Rights is so profoundly unfair to them. Seriously, what will this person do when she no longer has McCain’s flunkies to protect her from the press?

Posted by: Heather | November 1, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Wow, I have never seen a thread with so many Obama trolls congregated in one spot.
What’s this obsession with Palin’s medical records? Surely not deranged Trigtruthers?
How many of you are being paid to copy and paste the same tripe over and over again on blogs and other websites?

Posted by: saint | November 1, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Palin’s statement about the media and the 1st amendment belie an astonishing — just astonishing — amalgam of ignorance, perverse logic and right-wing double-think.
1. The 1st Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”
A journalist’s criticism of Palin’s negative campaigning is not Congress making a law, much less a law abridging freedom of speech. Nor is it abridging freedom of the press (quite the opposite, it is an EXERCISE of freedom of the press).

Posted by: Herman | November 1, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

So wait, the media should not be allowed to say what they think because…it violates Palin’s free speech?
If you can’t understand the massive contradiction in that statement, you should not be allowed to vote!

Posted by: Enrah | November 1, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

2. Palin’s remark reduces to the proposition that “freedom of speech” means the freedom to express only those views that she agrees with. Here is the basic logic (beginning by taking as correct Palin’s erroneous assumption that the 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech):
The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of expression;
Palin has a point of view (re. Obama’s alleged “associations”);
Palin expresses her point of view.
The press characterize Palin’s point of view as “negative campaigning”;
The public are persuaded by the press that Palin’s point of view is properly characterized as “negative campaigning”;
In the face of the public’s reaction to Palin’s point of view, Palin feels constrained to continue to express her point of view;
Because Palin feels constrained to continue to express her point of view, (here comes the lie) it must follow that the press are calling for the abridgement of Palin’s right to express her point of view.
Since the 1st Amendment (supposedly) guarantees freedom of speech, to honor that guarantee, the press must refrain from expressing a point of view different from Palin’s.
Hence, freedom of speech means the freedom to either (a) express views with which Palin agrees, or (b) express no view at all (i.e., keep you mouth shut).
In brief, freedom of speech means the freedom to agree with Palin. Correlatively, disagreeing with Sarah Palin is unconstitutional.
George Orwell (and George Bush) would be impressed.

Posted by: Herman | November 1, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Enrah,
You hit the nail on the head. As I said, in under Palin’s logic, the 1st Amendment only guarantees the freedom to say things Palin agrees with. Disagreeing with Palin is unconstitutional.
This is reveals the mind of a person who is mere days from potentially becoming elected to the 2nd most powerful political office in human history.
If Palin had the slightest inclination to sober self-reflection, she would be ashamed of herself.

Posted by: Herman | November 1, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I am a first generation immigrant from India and I am confused (to put it mildly) by nim’s argument for not voting for Obama. It seems like, he is living in early 20th century India where kids were asked to take a shower if they were seen talking to untouchables.
Get to the 21st century you nimnut(sp?)!

Posted by: jazzman | November 1, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

LOOOSERS,
Apparently Govenor Palin is a lot smarter then you are. Look and see where you are and then look and see where you are.
We know lot more about Govenor Palin then Senator Obama.
Go and vote, vote, vote to make your voice heard.
If not, don’t complain and say I did not know.

Posted by: USAfirst | November 1, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I am a first generation immigrant from India and I am confused (to put it mildly) by nim’s argument for not voting for Obama. It seems like, he is living in early 20th century India where kids were asked to take a shower if they were seen talking to untouchables.
Get to the 21st century you nimnut(sp?)!

Posted by: jazzman | November 1, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

What does she care about the Constitution for anyway? It’s not like we enforce it any more, ever since *at least* the time naturally growing drugs were first taxed into illegality. Of course her attacks were politically motivated, and yes, that IS protected by the first amendment. Who was it that said ‘I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will fight to the death to defend your right to say it’?

Posted by: Phil E. Drifter | November 1, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

How is this not a bigger story?
Places where the politicians can say anything without fear of media scrutiny are usually called Dictatorships. Perhaps Palin want us to be more like Cuba or China?

Posted by: blair | November 1, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Attention McCain voters.
SARAH PALIN BELIEVES IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO DISAGREE WITH HER.

Posted by: Barn | November 1, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

You know, this is really irresponsible blogging/reporting whatever you want to call it—it is merely a platform for a political figure to send out her message, uncontested and unchecked for reality. How hard would it have been to call up a media expert and say, “Hey, so does Palin have a point here?” You know someone to offer a thoughtful appraisal. As it is, he charges stand uncontested and irrefuted. It’s allowing demagoguery and that is really irresponsible regardless of who the candidate is. Do better.

Posted by: Tim | November 1, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

The fact that Palin is ignorant of the Constitution is secondary to her not even caring about it. There is no doubt that she will ignore or even work to circumvent the Constitution, just like the Bush administration has done, if it suits her. Her comments on expanding the powers of the Vice President were both ignorant and outrageous.
McCain made a very poor choice in Sarah Palin. Republicans can and hopefully will make much better choices in the future. In the meantime, we must acknowledge that Palin is an extremely divisive and dangerous politician who must be eradicated from the political landscape!

Posted by: Benton | November 1, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

With all of this “talk” about Palin going rogue on McCain and being a political “diva”, I was beginning to give Palin the benefit of doubt and to blame McCain for Palin’s plummeting approval ratings. Initially I thought McCain’s attempt to sequester Palin from the press was a huge mistake that backfired with her restricted access and limited interviews with Couric and Gibson. My reasoning was that Sarah Palin could not be as dumb as she appeared in those interviews and that McCain’s attempt to keep her away from the press only magnified her mistakes and missteps. But, alas, I now KNOW why McCain sequestered Palin–she is a talking time bomb. If you give her any substantial airtime, eventually she just says something so utterly stupid and indefensible that you have to ask yourself, “Did she really just say that?” And this time she can’t blame this on the “gotcha”, “liberal”, “elitist” MSM either. She’s preaching to the choir in this interview with the conservative, Chris Plante. Her interpretation of the first amendment right would be laughable… except that she is running for the highest office in the land. I now completely understand why McCain initially had a muzzle on her. Intellectually, she’s very, very, very weak. How can someone aspiring to the highest office of the land even make this ridiculous claim of her first amendment right being violated by the press? Palin is so utterly unqualified to lead this country. Period. I don’t care if she had 40 years of executive experience or is a maverick that had reformed the entire good-ole boy, corrupt political system in Alaska. She doesn’t DESERVE to be anywhere near the White House. And for all of these gatorade-drinking Palin supporters, how can you continue to defend these indefensible statements? And ultimately, shame on you Senator McCain for subjecting our country to this caricature of a VP. You, yourself, must have realized in your own conversations that Sarah was in waaaaaay over her head. Yet, you have continued to put our country at risk by forging ahead even though you must have realized that she is NOT qualified to be VP. So much for country first.

Posted by: Greg | November 1, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Ah, Dear DumDum,
No one is going take away your 1st Amendment rights, if you speak trash, expect to be called on it, that is what will happen.
Gov. Palin, can spew her slander and lies as does the Westboro Baptist Church does, they don’t get a free ticket to do it without others speaking back.
An intelligent person understands that, Mrs. Palin shows clearly over and over again, she lacks the mental capacity to lead anyone but the ignorant.

Posted by: Conservative Not NeoCon | November 1, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

You all like your right to speak freely,
good for you, vote to keep it.
Vote, Vote, Vote

Posted by: USAfirst | November 1, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I’m sure glad all of you are so smart and everyone else is dumb.
Vote, Vote, Vote.
The Messiah speaks and speaks but says nothing.

Posted by: USAfirst | November 1, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Most of you probably saw Obamas Medical records and not his birth certificate. See Obamas birth certificate.

Posted by: Fe | November 1, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Gigi,
maybe if you would go out and look for a job, and not sit by the computer all day writing socalled smart things, you probably could get a job, and not have to wait till Sen. Oboma sends you the wellfare check.

Posted by: usa all the way | November 1, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!
I TOLE HIM, YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON MICHELLE, BUT IT’S STILL A GORILLA!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | November 1, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.”
Sarah is completely right. the liberal media is unfairly attacking her and Her god-given rights to free expression are being infringed.

Posted by: Rauol | November 1, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

usa all the way,
GIGI, is a stupid Obamma blogger who is on here constantly.
She needs to get out of her mom’s basement before her mom kicks her out of the house.
Maybe she could get a real job, maybe McDonalds for starters.

Posted by: . | November 1, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

GrannyToot, you are so brilliant. Your words have blinded me. You should have the handle GrannyHoot because you and others who join you are absolutely too ignorant for words. AND I am sure you believe yourselves to be real cute, cutting-edge, and to the point. Believe me the world and the USA will go on with you being totally unnoticed as anyone essential to the good of the order, however that is determined.

Posted by: LadyAfrica | November 1, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Hey Raoul,
Your comment is non-responsive. How about actually making an argument instead of simply offering an unsupported statement that fails to address the issue, assumes as true a number of assertions that go unproven, and assume as true a premise that is contrary to the facts.
You can start by explaining how and why Palin’s remarks: (1) do not misconstrue a plain reading of the 1st Amendment; and (2) do not reduce to the logical proposition that viewpoints contrary to her own are unconstitutional.
I anxiously await your insights.

Posted by: The real Raoul | November 1, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Palin has never read the Constitution, that is the only explanation for her misunderstanding. Reading the 1st Amendment takes about 10 seconds, and I understood the basics of what it meant when I was in Kindergarten. Either she’s less intelligent than an Elementary School child, or she’s just simply never read it, and is spouting something she heard on Faux News. I think it must be the latter, because no one could be that dumb.

Posted by: Susan | November 1, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I just saw this comment elsewhere:
The LA Times seems to think it’s not in the public interest what went on at the Jew bashing party Barack Obama attended at his friend Rashid Khalidi’s house.
I was thinking…if the LA Times doesn’t want Americans to know, maybe Professor Khalidi will let us know.
He does not take calls from journalists…only private citizens…
Call 212.666.5463
Amazing little thing that Google search…
I spoke with him today…check out my blog to find out more…
http://scattershooting.wordpress.com

Posted by: americanpatriot | November 1, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I CAN’T GET THESE TIRE MARKS OFF’N ME, FROM WHEN THAT DAMN BUCKY THREW ME UNDER THE BUS!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | November 1, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

‘GrannyToot, you are so brilliant. Your words have blinded me. You should have the handle GrannyHoot because you and others who join you are absolutely too ignorant for words. AND I am sure you believe yourselves to be real cute, cutting-edge, and to the point. Believe me the world and the USA will go on with you being totally unnoticed as anyone essential to the good of the order, however that is determined.’
I BET YOUR VOTING FOR OBAMMY BECAUSE YOU ARE BLACK!
TOOT, TOOT, WOO0T WOOT!
YOU ARE A LOSER DEARIE!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | November 1, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Would somebody please remind Palin that it was she who dissed the main stream media right at the outset, and now she is crying unfair because they are not treating her fairly!

Posted by: hibud | November 1, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

who really cares what this half wit has to say —we have heard enough of that emptyheaded screechy voice—mccain showed us one thing for sure —he really has started a freak show—he would make pt barnum proud.

Posted by: rodney | November 1, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I thought she had a degree in journalism from one of those many colleges she attended.
Must have been a BS degree.

Posted by: Nerdy Ned | November 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Yes, media criticism of politicians is a violation of the Bill of Rights.
Just like ‘potato’ is spelled with an ‘e.’

Posted by: Prairiefire | November 1, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

You call her stupid, dumm etc. etc.
LOOOSERS, apparently she is smarter then all of you, see were she is and then look and see where you are,
Sen. Obama will not invide you to his dinners,(lobster, caviar, champagne) but I don’t think can you afford them. ($28,000)But its the american dream, so keep dreaming, and send him you dollars so I don’t have to pay for any of it. I for one like to keep what I work for and not have the government tell me how much I can keep.
So all of you go out and vote, vote, vote as many times as ACHORN will let you.

Posted by: usa | November 1, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

You call her stupid, dumm etc. etc.
LOOOSERS, apparently she is smarter then all of you, see were she is and then look and see where you are,
Sen. Obama will not invide you to his dinners,(lobster, caviar, champagne) but I don’t think can you afford them. ($28,000)But its the american dream, so keep dreaming, and send him you dollars so I don’t have to pay for any of it. I for one like to keep what I work for and not have the government tell me how much I can keep.
So all of you go out and vote, vote, vote as many times as ACHORN will let you.

Posted by: usa | November 1, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Well, if we’re going to play the Guilt by Association game, let’s go!
Perhaps McCain would like to explain these associations to the American people, including why he chose to appear on G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show less than a year ago and praise him.
Help spread the word – make this viral. Learn these facts to rebut smears against Obama’s ties, post them on your blogs, share them with others and email them to the editorial pages of your local newspapers. You CAN make a difference.
Jim Hensley, Convicted Felon
G. Gordon Liddy, Convicted Felon
Charles Keating, Convicted Felon
Raffaello Follieri, Convicted Felon
Rick Renzi, Under Indictment
Rick Davis, Freddie Mac Lobbyist
Charles Black, Lobbyist for Dictators
Richard Quinn, White Supremacist
Pastor John Hagee, Bigot
Pastor Rod Parsley, Bigot
Todd Palin, Member of Secessionist Group
Andrew McCain, Resigned Manager Savings & Loan

Posted by: Nerdy Ned | November 1, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Well, if we’re going to play the Guilt by Association game, let’s go!
Perhaps McCain would like to explain these associations to the American people, including why he chose to appear on G. Gordon Liddy’s radio show less than a year ago and praise him.
Help spread the word – make this viral. Learn these facts to rebut smears against Obama’s ties, post them on your blogs, share them with others and email them to the editorial pages of your local newspapers. You CAN make a difference.
Jim Hensley, Convicted Felon
G. Gordon Liddy, Convicted Felon
Charles Keating, Convicted Felon
Raffaello Follieri, Convicted Felon
Rick Renzi, Under Indictment
Rick Davis, Freddie Mac Lobbyist
Charles Black, Lobbyist for Dictators
Richard Quinn, White Supremacist
Pastor John Hagee, Bigot
Pastor Rod Parsley, Bigot
Todd Palin, Member of Secessionist Group
Andrew McCain, Resigned Manager Savings & Loan

Posted by: Nerdy Ned | November 1, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

She is really ignorant. What else can you say about her. She is running for the Vice President of the USA – she is not running for dog catcher . How sad. Palin just cost McCain the election.
Sarah Palin – John McCain’s new legacy.

Posted by: hottopics | November 1, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

What in the name of God is this woman about? She is a total fruitcake. First dude. What is this? Sarah and Todds most excellent adventure.
Stevens, Palin? Alaska is doomed. Lets lease it to the Chinese and make some money.

Posted by: JPJR | November 1, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

“Dumb by whos standards yours or the medias Can you not think for yourself.It is okay too Obama wont shut down critics completley until he is elected.”
I’m going to say that by the standards of even basic education, she’s a tree stump. Now, I understand your OWN lack of education keeps you from seeing this, so I’ll demonstrate by correcting your above quote:
“Dumb by [whos] whose standards[missing comma], yours or the media[missing apostrophe]‘s [missed punctuation]? Can you not think for yourself[wrong punctation choice - .]? ["It is okay too" - this fragment makes no sense] Obama won[missing apostrophe]‘t shut down critics [completley] completely until he is elected.”
Reddog, she is dumb by the same set of standards showing that you are dumb.

Posted by: aegis | November 1, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Is anyone else alarmed that back before the primaries McCain stated that his favorite show was “Prison Break” In “Prison Break” the main villain is the female vice-president, Caroline Reynolds, who assumes the presidency by poisoning and killing the president. By choosing Sara Palin is McCain acting out some sort of death wish? Or does he just not pay attention to the “details” of his favorite show?

Posted by: Alarmed | November 1, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

The reason Sarah hasn’t releasd her medical records is because that baby isn’t hers. It’s Bristol’s. Bristol was taken out of school for 5 or 6 months because of a severe case of Mono. I don’t think so. And even though SARAH IS STRONG IN EVERY SINCE OF THE WORD, no woman can substain labor pains for a 10 hour flight from Texas to Alaska after giving a 30 minute speech, then get off the plane and drive 1 hour out of her way to go deliver at a hospital across town. Not to mention her water broke that morning. That’s not her child. Down’s Syndrome rarely happens to a woman in her 40′s, it more common in young women.

Posted by: KINNIDI | November 1, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

The automatic ‘Mute’ button in my ears lights up anytime Palin is about to utter a word.
Stupidity should not be rewarded for a nano-second.

Posted by: Independent | November 1, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

where has Michelle been lately? They got that hoe locked up in the closet with her big a@@ and big mouth!

Posted by: HIDEY HOE AND THE MOFO | November 1, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

We need to have Palin’s medical records pronto…..everyone has the right to know when and how she gave birth to that child..

Posted by: shirley | November 1, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Release the medical records Sarah Palin, It’s time for some straight talk express…….thats if you have nothing to hide!

Posted by: Renegade Ray | November 1, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

The best thing that can happen to this country is that we keep letting Sarah be Sarah. She loves the taste of her feet and has no concept of the constitution, national or international policy and issues. This will kill her chances in 2012. My sadness is that she will damage all the fine work that HRC has done for women in politics. My daughters deserve better Senator McCain.

Posted by: Lou-NH | November 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

From what I am hearing and reading, we are about to experience the biggest wave of reverse racism in history. When black interviewees can’t express the first thing about Obama’s policies or the name of his running mate, now THAT’S racism. When an African American four-year-old has been taught to tell a reporter that John McCain is bad, THAT’S racism. When life means so little to a potential president that he will vote for partial birth abortion, he is not my candidate. I hope America wakes up between now and Tuesday.

Posted by: Nancy | November 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

It is important to stay on track here folks.
We are not good follows and believers in Obama when we get to the level of attacking, especially the expressions of anger seen here. Win them over. Do not copy their methods. Give facts as best you can and let them decide. Rise above the situation and ignore the silliness. Palin is not the issue. America is.
A man is born of a woman who happens to be white and whose father happens to be black. Does that make him white, black or a something else? In this case one candidate is all. Does it make him less of an American? It might if you see color and not the man.
In Jewish and other traditions, the mother determines the religion, class, race and tribe. But even if that does not control the emotions of a few, I have no fear of the so-called “Bradley effect” because:
I believe in the “Obama effect”, to rise above the past bias, ignorance and lies meant to divide and create senseless fear.
I believe deep down every conservative and every liberal each in their own way believes in America, its claim that every man and woman is equal in the eyes of the law, in our treatment of each other and the equal opportunity every American shares with every other American to reach their highest goals, the farthest stars, even if one of them is the dream to become President.
I believe Americans want an open society built on the true and growing, ever changing traditions that are afforded in our Declaration of Independance, our oft amended Constitution and Bill of Rights and memorialized at the Statue of Liberty:
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
I believe that Americans are tired of false prophets whose open involvement of our political structure are causing a debasement and destruction of those who hold strong, dear, loving and accepting traditions in their religious expressions.
Americans have taken a dose of difficult to swallow medicine to get over that cold.
I believe Americans after 30 years of seeing THEIR money redistributed to the McCains, Bloombergs, Bushs, Cheneys, Wall Street brokers, HMO executives, bankers, major corporate CEOs, (now make 500-1,000 times more per year than the average Joe the wannabe-plumber, teacher, construction and production line workers.
I believe that Americans after the last 30 years of working and toiling to survive, to put food on the table and pay for their homes, kids’ schooling, medical care, and retirements understand that in their worst day they have produced more goods and services of value and meaning to America than those social climbing leeches who demand special privileges, tax reductions and a $700 billion ransom for their failures, bonuses and stock dividends. In the terms of the conservatives, free marketers, and anti-regulationers, they are not deserving.
I believe that Americans will not be driven by transparent and desperate attacks built on fear, lies and prejudices but for the first time in a long time accept that they were skillfully and puposefully manipulated to vote against their own economic, family and political interests and will say, “No more!”, “No mas!” Enough!
If these beliefs are not true, the hate mongers win and we should close the doors of America, build fences around each state, county, city and village and triple lock our doors.
America. You have a great opportunity to regain the good name of America at home and abroad, improve democracy and your own family’s economic well-being. If you can’t do it for yourself, do it for your own children and grandchildren.

Posted by: ed g | November 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I wonder how Sarah was even able to graduate from high school. She knows less about the constitution than a high school senior. And the Republicans want her to be one heartbeat away from becoming leader of the free world?

Posted by: uncle sam | November 1, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

It is important to stay on track here folks. (continued)
We are not good follows and believers in Obama when we get to the level of attacking, especially the expressions of anger seen here. Win them over. Do not copy their methods. Give facts as best you can and let them decide. Rise above the situation and ignore the silliness. Palin is not the issue. America is.
A man is born of a woman who happens to be white and whose father happens to be black. Does that make him white, black or a something else? In this case one candidate is all. Does it make him less of an American? It might if you see color and not the man.
In Jewish and other traditions, the mother determines the religion, class, race and tribe. But even if that does not control the emotions of a few, I have no fear of the so-called “Bradley effect” because:
I believe in the “Obama effect”, to rise above the past bias, ignorance and lies meant to divide and create senseless fear.
I believe deep down every conservative and every liberal each in their own way believes in America, its claim that every man and woman is equal in the eyes of the law, in our treatment of each other and the equal opportunity every American shares with every other American to reach their highest goals, the farthest stars, even if one of them is the dream to become President.
I believe Americans want an open society built on the true and growing, ever changing traditions that are afforded in our Declaration of Independance, our oft amended Constitution and Bill of Rights and memorialized at the Statue of Liberty:
“Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
I believe that Americans are tired of false prophets whose open involvement of our political structure are causing a debasement and destruction of those who hold strong, dear, loving and accepting traditions in their religious expressions.
Americans have taken a dose of difficult to swallow medicine to get over that cold.
I believe Americans after 30 years of seeing THEIR money redistributed to the McCains, Bloombergs, Bushs, Cheneys, Wall Street brokers, HMO executives, bankers, major corporate CEOs, (now make 500-1,000 times more per year than the average Joe the wannabe-plumber, teacher, construction and production line workers.
I believe that Americans after the last 30 years of working and toiling to survive, to put food on the table and pay for their homes, kids’ schooling, medical care, and retirements understand that in their worst day they have produced more goods and services of value and meaning to America than those social climbing leeches who demand special privileges, tax reductions and a $700 billion ransom for their failures, bonuses and stock dividends. In the terms of the conservatives, free marketers, and anti-regulationers, they are not deserving.
I believe that Americans will not be driven by transparent and desperate attacks built on fear, lies and prejudices but for the first time in a long time accept that they were skillfully and puposefully manipulated to vote against their own economic, family and political interests and will say, “No more!”, “No mas!” Enough!
If these beliefs are not true, the hate mongers win and we should close the doors of America, build fences around each state, county, city and village and triple lock our doors.
America. You have a great opportunity to regain the good name of America at home and abroad, improve democracy and your own family’s economic well-being. If you can’t do it for yourself, do it for your own children and grandchildren.

Posted by: ed g | November 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Our United States Would not have been attacked on 9-11-2001 if The liberal Democrat Voters did not
vote Slick Willy/The Clintons into a Trust worthy Highest Respected Office, of Presidency, period.
Now Because he wasn’t doing his job, to watch and to protect the Country.
Osama BinLaden terrorist leader, was within this Country planning another previous Attack again after
Destroying the parking Garage beneath, the World Trade Centers Building, with horrible carnage, mass
destruction, and injuring others. Today 2008, We all, still suffer the effects of the attacks on the world
trade centers. Another reason why the Economy, Wall Street, every towns Main Street, is still effected.
He was impeached, on SEVEN COUNTS OF IMPEACHMENT! Disrespectful, lying, felony, Womanizer,
Clown. But, was not removed from office. Shame. Even Joe Biden voted for impeachment.
Honorable Joe Lieberman, did the Right thing! Voted for Clintons Impeachment! He didn’t leave the
Democrat party. The party left Him. He voted Bipartisan. The honorable thing.
B. Clinton, should have been removed form Office, and not portrayed as a Hero. He pardoned over 200
criminals including drug dealers, in his last days of presidency. What a shame. What a sham.
Voting for “Barrack Hussein Obama” Will Bring and almost Guarantees more of the Same.
The Alleged A.C.O.R.N. group is under Investigation. They promote Voter fraud, the immediate Media
is a cover up of the Democrat Cheat to win. Their agenda is get all Democrats elected any way, any how!
If Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, would like to keep and protect an accurate Election.
With no Improper Election fraud. Within our State, The right and proper thing to do is.
Insure that all eligible voters when handed a ballot, even an absentee ballot, to apply their legal social security number attached written on the ballot to be recorded and verified, with the new computer read scanner, voting machines.
Then and there, nationally if voter fraud, excessive voting and accuracy can be verified, instantaiously.
When voter verification is recorded.
One Vote, One Voter!
No more dead gold fish voters, deceased voters, multiple illegal voters.
With mandating the Voter apply his/her, Legal social security number be written on the ballot, for the vote scanner this should be mandated though out our Country at all the polls and insure voter accuracy, and legimaticy.
With strong severe Federal election law penalties, of severe fines and imprisonment.
Along with the eradication of our Rights , liberties, Pursuit of Happiness, and Security!
I personally do not believe he was born within the United States or is a Citizen! That disqualifies his
presidency. The Media including the Hartford Courant, The Journal Inquirer. Have been Bias
supporting, campaigning for Obama Democrats. Allowing,Terrible cartoon characters, pictures, untrue
mockery and ridicule of the Republican candidates.
John McCain and Sarah Palin have an economic plan that celebrates the American dream of opportunity,
not government give aways. In this country, we believe in spreading opportunity, for those who need
jobs and those who create them. That’s why their economic plan – Jobs for America – is so
important for the American people in this time of economic crisis. While Barack Obama is ready to
“spread the wealth around,” John McCain has a plan to get our economy moving so everyone has
access to good jobs, a quality education and the opportunity to succeed.
Honorable John McCain and Sarah Palin offer Honesty, Fresh recovery, no tax increases, strength
prosperity, stability, and Security, for our country .
Vote good Hon. John McCain and Sarah Palin for the Best of our Country. The United States of
America.!! God Bless America if U don’t ! Thank You

Posted by: Born American Pro American | November 2, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I think that she has a point,sad but true.First of all he left his church for political reasons and then act as if he had know idea Rev.Wright was like that,and second don’t let me get started about his house which he bought for 300,000 under the asking price years before the market crashed.Third he has as many shady friends as a dog flees also he broke his word when it came to public finance of his campaign.

Posted by: WILL | November 2, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Why do we honor all our soldiers who fought so hard and died to protect our freedoms? So that later America could be taken over by a fascist leader who would stifle criticism, arrest reporters, and destroy any media outlets that object to her statements? If Palin is in fact elected, shame on America!

Posted by: A proud soldier | November 2, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

I wish she just have her medical records released so we can move on. It’s just that simple. No one cares about her health.

Posted by: rnsnt | November 2, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

This woman is a disgrace to womanhood. How can she be in that position as governor and still does not know her First Amendment Rights. She’s a joke.
she’s just adding more injury to insult.

Posted by: malo | November 2, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Mccain dies & bubblehead takes over…scary

Posted by: NVH | November 2, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am

You know, the legal argument in Bush v Gore was that Bush would suffer irreparable harm if Florida were allowed to count its votes.
Sarah Palin is a perfect representative of the Republican Party. Maybe that’s her problem: she’s too representative for her own good.

Posted by: Aatos | November 2, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am

>>>Get a grip and some sense my fellow girls and women – protect our daughters and future generations! VOTE OBAMA!<<< Ah, yes. Vote for the guy who referred to a female reporter as "sweetie." That sounds like an advance in women's rights.

Posted by: Son of Rodin | November 2, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am

Sara palin say the media is not treating her fair.Bill clinton got a pounding from the far right.I see lot comment.where people blast one side or the other. It so hard to see the real truth out there.And I talking about reality truth. and not all these other so called truth.

Posted by: ray thomas | November 2, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Sara palin say the media is not treating her fair.Bill clinton got a pounding from the far right.I see lot comment.where people blast one side or the other. It so hard to see the real truth out there.And I talking about reality truth. and not all these other so called truth.

Posted by: ray thomas | November 2, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Sara Palin’s comments don’t surprise me
in the least. Just another example of how little she really knows and understands. Don’t worry folks, we only
have a few more days until this pathetic
example of ignorance and intollerance will be consigned to the dustbin of history. I wouldn’t surprise me if the
folks back in Alaska had a few things to
add to the story once she returns.

Posted by: Brian76239 | November 2, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

I wish Governor Palin would have actually read the constitution at some point in her political career. She makes these ridiculous gaffes that embarrasses all women. First, she “reinterprets” the constitution with regard to the role of the Vice President and now she displays her clear lack of understanding of first amendment rights.
God help our country should she ever set foot in the oval office. This woman is not just woefully underqualified. She is to cite a McCain official “a whack job.”

Posted by: KatiaK | November 2, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

McCain stood a chance to win in my book…until he picked Sarah. She is not even in the ball park with Hillary. She dodges questions , tries to make lite of her life as a mom , tries to hard to convince and remind people “she is just a down to earth person”, and lashes out at people just to look good and get ahead. I need a level headed person, like OBAMA in the office. McCain has already hurt American, before he gets into office..he picked an woman who has no sense of politics and is to wet behind the ears to know it.

Posted by: AL | November 2, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

So Palin is concerned about her 1st amendment rights as she attacks Obama, but the Press, who also have 1st Amendment rights are not entitled to critize her for her attacks.
That sounds a bit hypocritical. Okay, it actually very hypocritical. She should be entitled to say what she wants about Obama, but the press can’t say what they want about her.
Scary

Posted by: DavidB | November 2, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Maybe Palin is not so dumb and is just evil and this is what she thinks the Constitution “should be”. Just like what she thinks a VP does, “gettin’ down and workin’ on those issues with the Senate”. Either way, the only way I give a rats a55 about Palin is to worry that maybe she’s not so dumb and more a potential extreme right wing dictator.
This person should not be allowed to get into the office of VP, not if you love this country. And if she does, McCain should hire a food taster.

Posted by: TruthBTold | November 2, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

It’s hard to believe that a journalism major has no idea what the 1st Amendment stands for. The fact that she thinks her First Amendment rights are being violated because people criticize her means that she has the meaning of that law entirely backwards.
This woman is a helmet-wearing retard.

Posted by: Steve R. | November 2, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Oh poor baby. This b%%tch wants to deny a women’s reproductive rights-but waaaaah, someone may restrict her right to spout nonsense.
I hope she burns in he11.

Posted by: McBailout/Ailin | November 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Why should she understand her 1st Amendment Rights under the Constitution. She does not understand what her job would be as Vice President under the Constitution

Posted by: Terry w Norwod | November 2, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I’ve got them and gave the to Boris Badenov and Natasha.
They claim squirrel took them and gave them to Moose.
We need to find Bullwinkle..

Posted by: Goldenboy | November 2, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Reasons for Real Fear
Many years ago, a man named Allen Drury wrote an extraordinarily frightening book called Come Nineveh, Come Tyre. I first read it when I was in early my teens; I was truly afraid for the United States as many of the possible political denouements described in the book seemed about to come true. I first read the book in the late 60s/early 70s, during the time of “revolution” and “social dissent.” The book clearly delineated where such thinking could lead us.
Thankfully, solid people have been at the helm of the country since that era, for the most part, and what appeared to be the inevitable end was averted. It appears now, however, that the end was not averted but merely delayed. The current political situation is slowly developing into an exact replica of the fearful descriptions about which Mr. Drury warned all those many years ago.
The fear engendered by the book is nothing to the deep, cold, almost paralyzing fear that many clear-headed Americans feel today. We are faced with the possible election of exactly the type of man who may not only bring the United States to the brink of disaster, but actually take the country over the edge into disaster and ultimate destruction.
Ever since Mr. Obama gained the Democratic Party’s nomination as their candidate for the Presidency of the United States, I have had a gnawing fear deep in my soul. As the candidate’s popularity has surged in recent weeks, the cold deep fear has gotten colder and deeper.
It was clear to me almost from his very first appearance as “The Candidate,” that the Democratic Party had finally made a choice that, should it be validated by majority vote in the national elections, may well doom the United States forever.
Very well, the last may well be a tad overdramatic, but not too much so, I daresay.
Should Mr. Obama ascend the high office of President of the United States despite the clear view we have had into the man – absolutely no experience to speak of worthy of the position, partners and supporters with extremely concerning characteristics (Ayres, Flagle, Wright, et al), complete lack of substance (but lots of “style!); dubious, to say the least, connections with an organization creating extraordinary concerns about the upcoming voting process (ACORN) – the world, when our enemies have taken a break from celebrating his ascension, will have nothing to say about our troubles than to remind us that we brought them on ourselves, that we chose this.
Mr. Obama and his followers have scaled the heights of inappropriateness from the start, helped no end by his media and those single-minded, unthinking supporters who merely hear what they want to hear, without an instant’s thought for the consequences.
Let me give some quotes from Mr. Drury’s insightful novel and how they almost tell the story of this year’s campaign, and show where we are headed should an Obama Presidency come to pass.
The following is an excellent description of the current liberal media’s general behavior almost since the start of the Obama candidacy and what they have provided as “explanations” and “responses” to any criticism of Mr. Obama. This is also a perfect description of Mr. Biden’s refusal to respond to a legitimate question from a legitimate news organization.
“ … Listen to them rationalize, listen to them pussyfoot, listen to them tiptoe and hide and evade and duck out from under the burden that history has put on them! Listen to them howl down dissent! It is all they can do in a crisis . . . It is all they have left!” … “So let them howl down opinions they don’t like, if they really think that’s worthy of what used to be a great Republic—if they really think that’s the way to make themselves safe, when the day comes that somebody doesn’t like their opinions…”
Mr. Drury also speaks to the type of consequences inherent in the extreme liberal perspective of Mr. Obama and those who subscribe to his thinking. Remember, Mr. Obama stated in public that he would be willing to meet with known terrorist nations without establishing preconditions. (The campaign later “explained” the comment to reflect what the Candidate really meant by saying that the meetings would not be on the Executive level but on the Secretarial level.)
Regardless, it is clear that there is a complete lack of comprehension as far as dealing with terrorists and terrorist nations is concerned. This mentality is very clearly described in the following:
“… The President of the United States and his perennially hopeful country had once again overlooked the one thing they never quite understand and never quite dare acknowledge to themselves: the endless and unrelenting malevolence of those who … wish them ill.”
There have always been and will always be (as proven on 09/11/01, and subsequent attacks since) those who detest, hate, and fear the United States (and those who may support her) to such an extent that they would do anything and everything in their power to destroy us. Unfortunately, it appears that in recent years, many of those who would destroy us are already within us.
Their naïveté and self-delusion have brought us to the point where the seemingly most popular candidate for President of the United States is one of which other countries will doubtless approve. Is there any question as to why other countries will approve of an Obama Presidency as opposed to a McCain Presidency?
Because Mr. Obama has already shown, by his past and current associations, his comments, and his behavior, that he is quite open to “negotiating” with those who wish us harm.
One of Mr. Obama’s “charms,” it can be said, is his desire (insistence, rather) to end all wars in which the United States is currently involved, regardless of risk to the safety and security of our country. An unfortunately large number of the population appears to desire this, as well. They, of course, are the “peace-loving” population of the country while those of us who wish to try to ensure our safety and security are designated as war-mongers.
Since it is clear that the naïveté of Mr. Obama and his followers runs very, very deep, let me provide the astute Mr. Drury’s definition of peace per the lexicon of those who have always hated the United States and will continue to do so until their hatred triumphs.
“They are besotted by the word ‘peace,’ the Americans. They do not realize that in all of human history peace has never really existed: there has only been an occasional uneasy absence of war. The fact does not fit comfortably with the clichés of [liberal America]. To acknowledge it is too difficult and too demanding. Clichés are more comfortable. Americans want comfort above all things. Ergo…history proceeds.”
We must ask in fear – now – before it is too late, where is this country going to proceed under an Obama presidency? In what direction, really, will the so-called “change” which he and his supporters bandy about so easily, take this country?
Is it not starkly clear, yet, that the abyss is growing ever closer? Do we not yet realize that the many, many incidents of attempts to shut down free expression and free speech have already started the slide?
Do we not already understand that the very fear that so many of us already feel is a bright spotlight on the many reasons this man and his supporters should not be given free rein in the White House?
I think Allen Drury had the perfect description of the reaction of one of our country’s enemies in reaction to exactly the type of action Mr. Obama claims to plan: wave the white flag of surrender.
“… it is the most noble, the most generous, the most statesmanlike and humanly decent policy any President of the United States has tried to follow… To us, it seems a spirit of true nobility and grandeur. We think, if you will forgive me, … he is infinitely better, from the world’s standpoint than the last two Presidents.”
Should the world’s opinion really matter to the United States so much? Must we really put ourselves in a position of appeasing and slavish agreement to all “requests”/demands that come from the world, no matter how the “requests” may affect the security and safety of the United States?
I do not believe for an instant that Mr. Obama has the intestinal fortitude or moral fiber to stand up to the enemies of the United States. Not only has it been made clear in his own speeches, behavior, and the behavior of his supporters, but it is clear in the reactions of the world that is already lauding an Obama Presidency.
The ascendance of Mr. Obama and his supporters to the Presidency of the United States will be nothing more than the ultimate victory of …
“… a conspiracy of intellectual bias, arrogance and stupidity conducted by a bunch of closed minds who think they’re so superior that they can tell everybody else what’s good for them.”
Quotes from: Come Nineveh, Come Tyre by Allan Drury, October 1971—February 1973
Copyright, MCzwz@aol.com, October 2008
http://www.thoughts.com/mczwz/blog

Posted by: Michele | November 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Palin didn’t say her first amendment rights are being violated by the media. She is saying we all have first amendment rights, but if one is repeatedly attacked by the media to the point of fearing to speak, that is a problem too. Listen to the interview. Its the title of these news articles that is misleading.
All of you armchair quarterbacks who think you are smarter or more capable that Sarah Palin wouldn’t last a 20 minutes with her in a face to face debate. You are all seem to be weak sexist men who google for information after the fact. yeah that makes you soooo smart.. good grief..
Sarah Palin has been a much better speaker than 99% of politicians.
A smart person with common sense is what we need in this world. A lot of good our Harvard and well educated “intellectuals” have done us managing the SEC, FED and investment banks. The hometown “simple” banker has done much better for investors by a long shot.
Bring back common sense..

Posted by: Rodger | November 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

So, Rodger, when would it be ok for the government to send in the police to bash in the mouths of the over-zealous critics of the government? Just want your common sense opinion.

Posted by: Steve | November 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

People should not be permitted to speak against someone like Sarah Palin when it prevents her from getting across her message. Her freedom of speech is being violated, and this is wrong.

Posted by: Natasha | November 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Steve:
How is her freedom of speech being violated? She’s been free to say anything she chooses. Is it the fault of the press that she’s so unprepared, so lacking in knowledge and intellect? She hasn’t been misquoted. Rather she’s been honest in her comments and, as a result, given the American public a close look at who would be a heartbeat away. The results? Pretty damn scary.
Thank God we have freedom of speech, otherwise we’d never know how incompetent this woman is.
A heartbeat away…and McCain’s health is questionable. Any good American could never let that happen… never let Palin be anything other than a casual visitor to the Whitehouse.

Posted by: Marty | November 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Natasha:
My comment was meant for you, not Steve. Sorry Steve.

Posted by: Marty | November 2, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Marty,
I agree with you on everything you said, except that business about her visiting the Whitehouse. The only whitehouse she should visit is an igloo.

Posted by: Steve | November 2, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

When Palin says, “I’m a practical person and plainspoken also, but just cutting to the chase and calling things like I see them,” she has gotten to the heart of the matter. The job of a politician is not to just respond to what is in plain sight but to discover and weigh facts which support and which don’t support their arguments. She does not do her job if merely repeating what she sees. Shame on Palin for suggesting that being vice president requires no more work than that.

Posted by: Mikew | November 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Steve:
Yep, an igloo fits, for sure…or, rather than the Whitehouse, an outhouse.

Posted by: Marty | November 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Fellow Americans:
We cannot have a “commoner” walking around with the Nuclear code in her pocket.
Remember, if common sense was so rare, it wouldn’t be called common. Give me an intellect with cool resolve sitting at the helm.

Posted by: Marty | November 2, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

“So, Rodger, when would it be ok for the government to send in the police to bash in the mouths of the over-zealous critics of the government? Just want your common sense opinion.
Posted by: Steve | Nov 2, 2008 6:14:07 PM”
It would never be ok for that.

Posted by: Rodger | November 2, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

yep, I agree.
Michelle could spend 150,000 like Palin, or even one million,
but she’d still look like a gorilla!
hahahahaha!
well maybe if she get’s a head transplant she would get her moneys worth!

Posted by: HOUSE GORILLAS | November 2, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

For those of you who haven’t bothered to read or listen to the whole interview, I will post it.
The author of this article has a COMPREHENSION problem or is trying to distort what was said by Palin. The rest of you who blindly agree with him points to the original problem Palin was expressing. The media distorting and attacking just like the title of this article does.
“Palin Fears Media Threaten Her First Amendment Rights”
Read and comprehend what she said…
From the interview..
——-
“I don’t think that they are doing their job when they suggest that calling a candidate out on their record, their plans for this country and their associations is mean spirited or negative campaigning. If they convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of first amendment rights, and our ability to ask questions with out fear of attacks by the main stream media. Look at Joe the plumber, good ole Joe the plumber in Toledo Ohio. He just asked a simple straight forward question and the media started investigating and attacking him. So.. you know there is some fear there and and in those terms I don’t think they have been doing their job in that kind of context.”
Sarah doesn’t say anything about the first amendment protecting her from the MEDIA. She indicated we all have first amendment rights.. including herself and Joe the plumber, but if people constantly get attacked by the liberal and biased media there might at some point be a fear of speaking out.

Posted by: rodger | November 2, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Rodger, I do respect your opinion; however, I disagree with your interpretation of her words.
She said “If they convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations then I don’t know what the future of our country would be in terms of first amendment rights….” The not-so-veiled threat made by the Republican nominee for Vice President is that the media’s freedom of the press should be curtailed to the point where only her views will prevail with the voters. If she should become president and nominate several Supreme Court justices who want to place these kinds of limitations on the First Amendment, then I say woe to our country.

Posted by: Steve | November 2, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Natasha,
She is not being prevented from saying or spewing anything, although she seems as if SHE is trying to prevent anyone from criticizing her. Freedom of the Press !!!!!!!! She has her cheerleaders (FIX), and she gets her props there. Stop whinning.
Sounds like a Dictatorship is what Sarah Palin she is looking for.

Posted by: Andrea | November 2, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

The point is about “fear”.. we all have first amendment rights. But people may hold back on saying what they feel if their is some “fear” that they might be harmed in some why.
Gays used to stay in the closet. Blacks stayed in the back of the bus… Why? because they had some “fear” of being harmed. Thankfully that fear was able to pass with time and hopefully gays will have the same rights to marry and have the same benefits as all other couples.
Make sure to not break up what Sarah said. She is talking about the potential of “fear” holding back what people might want to say. Just like blacks and gays held back what they wanted to say and fight for for so long..

Posted by: Rodger | November 2, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Please substitute there for their.. above.. oops.. ;)

Posted by: Rodger | November 2, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

We all know why McCain chose Palin for his running mate. He was trying to pull Hillary Clinton supporters, so there goes his slogan of “Country First”. He put his political career ahead of the American people which is a very selfish attitude. He is putting the lives of all of us in jeopardy by nominating Sara Palin. She has only knowledge of state and local government and none on national or international government. I commend the Obama campaign for taking the “high road”. Palin is no angel and the could have brought up Pastor Mutha and devil worshipping or troopergate. The only thing the McCain campaign does is spew negativity and does nothing to elaborate on issues that effect Americans or how to get this economy back on track. During the Bush years, my husband has gone through 3 different layoffs, so our savings are depleted. I CAN’T GO THROUGH ANOTHER 4 YEARS LIKE THE LAST 8 YEARS. I will be homeless and penniless. Please vote Obama for President.

Posted by: V Hood | November 2, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Below is a comment from House Gorillas which is a racist remarks. African Americans have been sterotyped as monkeys, gorillas, etc. She is a classy lady and doesn’t need to pretend to be something that she’s not. I can tell you are a McCain supporter because of the name calling and racial undertones.
“yep, I agree. Michelle could spend 150,000 like Palin, or even one million,
but she’d still look like a gorilla!
hahahahaha!
well maybe if she get’s a head transplant she would get her moneys worth!”

Posted by: v hood | November 2, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Has Governor Palin ever read the United States Constitution? Has Governor Palin ever read the laws against hate crimes? If she takes the time to read and understand those documents, she will have no reason to fear the media, mainstream or otherwise. The issue, as Palin should know, has never been about her freedom of speech to question Obama’s past associations but rather her efforts to paint Obama as someone who “pals around with terrorists.” It is no small thing when our country is at war on terror to accuse a United States Senator of working closely with the enemy.

Posted by: gingersnap1951 | November 3, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

She seems to be exercising her right to remain ignorant.
Come Nov 4 a lot of prayers will be answered. If the answer to your prayer is a resounding “No way” take it up with God.

Posted by: Rodger | November 3, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!
I TOLE HIM, YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON MICHELLE, BUT IT’S STILL A GORILLA!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | November 3, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

You people are crazy.
You are all Americans, and yet you absolutely HATE one another. The Republican hatred of the Democrats is most obvious (eight years of labeling those on the other side as traitors) but the Democrats aren’t much better.
What the hell is wrong with all of you?

Posted by: Eric | November 3, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Not that anyone will pay any attention, I figured I should comment on the actual topic.
What Rodger is referring to is known as a ‘chilling effect’, the idea that people will be unwilling to speak up if they will be subjected to some sort of backlash. She has a point, but only a small one.
The point she is forgetting is that no one is preventing her, or Joe the Plumber, or Rodger from speaking their mind. But by stepping onto the public stage, that means they will be subjected to incredible scrutiny. Joe the Plumber stepped out and the spotlight was turned on him, if the glare is too bright, maybe he shouldn’t have come out.
Some actors and other celebrities quit their chosen profession because they can’t stand the spotlight. Its the price of fame.
Bob the Plumber shouldn’t have any complaints though, along with his 15 minutes of fame comes the chance to make some money, and a story he can tell his grand kids.
The other side of this coin is the question of what she would have the media do? Nothing? How is that doing their job?
The answer to free speech is more free speech. Both sides get to speak their mind. And both sides get to call the others liars. That’s how this works.
The thing with Ayers is silly (Obama was maybe 8 years old when this supposed link occurred). Rev. Wright is a jerk and Obama has denounced the reverend’s more radical views – besides guilt by association links McCain to Ann Coulter, quite possibly the most racist and hate filled public figure in the western hemisphere. And as for Obama being at the same party as this Khalidi guy, well, McCain led the International Republican Institute when it gave a bunch of money (over a half million dollars) to Khalidi’s Center for Palestinian Research and Studies (who’s the bigger supporter of terrorism now, the guy who happened to be at the same party, or the guy who gave them money?)
These slurs are nothing but B.S. and have been publicly discredited. Yet McCain/ Palin continue to spew them. And at the same time they offer very little of substance as to why people should vote for them, they are just trying to be scary and say Obama is ‘the enemy’.
Declaring these points as nothing but attacks is simply stating the facts. Palin is invoking the Constitution and Bill of Rights in an attempt to chill criticism, that’s all.

Posted by: eric | November 3, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

As a conservative there is NO WAY I can vote for McCain. Palin thinks man walked with dinosaurs! What does she have against science and fact? She is too far right and is the product of sean/rush/billo in that she represents the far right of the dead Republican Party. McCain embraced the very folks who defeated him in 2000…the traitor Rove!

Posted by: Santa Fean | November 3, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Having read the above comments I think that Palin is a either dumb-headed political cowgirl ready to shoot up the town or a pitiful bubble-headed Barbie uttering inanities–probably more the latter. I think it’s great that the Republicans want her to run for president in 2012. They are sure to lose to Obama (assuming he wins the election tomorrow). Why is it that the Republicans have to support the most mediocre of politicians? Do they think we are a bunch of dopes?

Posted by: John | November 4, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

You radicalibs need to show a little respect for the governor!
She may not know what the Bush Doctrine is (that the U.S. has a right to preemptively strike, as we supposedly did in Iraq), but she sure knows the Palin codicil to the First Amendment, which states:
Thou (elite, liberal, gotcha, “not pro-America” media) shall not disparage, denigrate nor criticize the proclamations of any evangelical Republican candidate regarding an opponent.
If that sounds more like a commandment than an amendment, you’re right. Any faithful, far-right, evangelical and respectable Republican would recognize it immediately as the 11th Commandment. The 12th says that, while our government may not declare an official religion:
Thou (evangelical Republican candidate) shall covertly impose thine own interpretation of Christian values on all citizens regardless of their own religion, whether or not they consent.

Posted by: Dave | November 4, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

A round of applause to the blog.Much thanks. Want more.

Posted by: sac Givenchy | October 18, 2011, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.