By Nitya

Oct 22, 2008 8:06am

Palin Reaches Out to Women Voters, Slams Obama for Passing Over Clinton

ABC News’ Imtiyaz Delawala Reports: A day after Sen. Barack Obama campaigned with former Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Clinton in Florida, Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin slammed him for not seriously considering Clinton to be his second-in-command, citing Obama’s decision as an example of the barriers women face in the workplace.

"When it came time for choosing, somehow Barack Obama just couldn’t bring himself to pick the woman who got 18 million votes in his primary, and that seems to be too familiar a story isn’t it?" Palin said at a rally in Henderson, NV yesterday. "How it is for so many American women that the qualifications are there, but for some reason the promotion never comes?

In stronger language than Palin has used on the campaign trail before, the comments were part of a broader attempt to sell herself as an advocate for women and working numbers at a time when Palin’s support among women has slipped dramatically in national polls since becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee.

"You’ve got to ask yourself why was Senator Hillary Clinton not even vetted by the Obama campaign?" Palin continued. "Why did it take 24 years, an entire generation from the time Geraldine Ferraro made her pioneering bid until the next time that a woman was asked to join a national ticket?"

"In the long history of our country, 74 people have held the position of President or Vice-President, and why have the major parties given America only two chances to even consider a woman for either office?" Palin asked. "This glass ceiling, it is still there, but it’s about time that we shattered that glass ceiling once and for all."

Clinton used the "glass ceiling" metaphor during her Democratic primary run, including in her concession speech in June ending her nomination, when she told supporters, "Although we weren’t able to shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling this time, thanks to you, it’s got about 18 million cracks in it."

Palin sought to tie her critique of Obama’s tax plans with her support for working women, while charging that Obama does not pay women in his Senate office at the same level as men, raising the issue as one of "fundamental fairness" that she would address as an advocate for working women.

"Out on the stump he talks a good game about equal pay for equal work, but according to the Senate pay roll records women on his own staff get just 83 cents for every dollar that the men get," Palin said of Obama. "That’s 9,000 dollars less every year that he pays the guys. Does he think that the women aren’t working as hard? Does he think that they are 17 percent less productive?"

The Palin campaign cited press reports from last month and Senate records to back its claims on Obama’s pay to Senate staffers. The discrepancy, however, appears be that more top level staffers in Obama’s Senate office are men, and therefore have higher pay. The Obama campaign points to the many senior-level female staffers currently employed on the presidential campaign trial.

In a statement last night, Obama senior adviser Anita Dunn added, "Sen. Obama has fought for equal pay for an equal day’s work, while Sen. McCain has suggested that women don’t get equal pay because they need more education and training. While Sen. Obama has proposed a plan to help working women, the McCain-Palin campaign offers just more negative attacks and distortions."

Palin has spent recent days on the campaign trail criticizing Obama’s tax policies as having elements of “socialism” that would redistribute wealth and hurt small businesses, while promoting the case of “Joe the Plumber.” Yesterday, Palin said that “women would suffer just as much from the massive tax increase that Sen. Obama proposes.”

Palin said. "The working women of this country, those who work inside the home and outside of the home, they’re overlooked by politicians in Washington, and Barack Obama hasn’t given us a single reason to believe that he would be any better."

Palin also emphasized her own experience as a working mother, saying she would serve as an advocate for working women and for females around the world as vice president.

"When we make laws in Washington…they need to serve the mothers who are taking care of their families," Palin said. "To make all this happen, working mothers need an advocate, and they will have one when this working mother is working for all of you in the White House."

Palin praised her husband Todd for his support while she has pursued her political career, while saying said that federal laws need to better support working mothers — especially those in households without a father.

"I’ve been very, very blessed to have a husband who’s supported me along the way. He’s a great dad who doesn’t disappear at bath time or run from diaper duty, and I appreciate that," Palin added. "But a lot of women have it much, much harder than I’ve had it. And they need child care, which today can cost some families a third of their household budget. And they need reforms in labor laws that allow greater flexibility in the workplace, including more tele-commuting. And they need a tax code that doesn’t penalize working families."

As she has done before on the campaign trail, Palin cited the positive impact that Title IX had on her career.

"Women of my generation were allowed finally to make more of our own choices with education, with career, and I have never forgotten that we owe that opportunity to women, to feminists who came before us," Palin said. "The belief in equal opportunity is not just the cause of feminists, it’s the creed of our country — equal opportunity."

Palin said that if elected, she would seek to spread that opportunity to other women around the world, especially for those in countries facing persecution where women are "murdered in honor killings, places where women are sold like commodities in the nightmare world of the sex trade, and places where baby girls are unwelcome as a matter of state policy and their mothers are forced to have abortions."

“Now no one person, no one leader, can bring an end to all of those ills, to all of the injustices inflicting upon women,” Palin said. “But I can promise you this, if I am elected, these women, too, will have an advocate and a defender in the 47th vice president of the United States.”

Palin was joined on stage by five women who endorsed her candidacy, including two members of the Democratic National Platform Committee, two leaders of chapters of the National Organization of Women, and a former editor of Ms. Magazine.

Lynn Rothschild, a Democratic National Platform Committee member and prominent supporter of Sen. Clinton, had endorsed the McCain-Palin ticket in September, but had not appeared publicly with Palin. Prameela Bartholomeusz also served on the Democratic Platform Committee..

Palin was also joined by Linda Klinge, the current vice president of the Oregon Chapter of the  National Organization for Women. Shelly Mandell, president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women, also appeared in Henderson, and had previously endorsed Palin at a public rally in Carson, CA earlier this month.

The campaign has often had former Hillary Clinton supporters introduce Palin at campaign events since her nomination, in an attempt to win over disaffected Clinton supporters. After introducing the women, Palin sought to dispute the idea that the Democratic ticket would easily win the female vote.

"Our opponents think that they have the women’s vote all locked up which is a little presumptuous since only our side has a woman on the ticket," Palin said to strong applause.

But the McCain-Palin ticket faces an uphill battle. An ABC News-Washington Post poll earlier this month showed Palin’s support has slipped dramatically in polls in the weeks since her nomination, with six in ten Americans doubting her qualifications for office and fewer than half convinced of her grasp of complex issues. Just 35 percent say Palin has the experience it takes to serve effectively as president.

And a new ABC News-Washington Post poll this week showed that 52 percent of likely voters say McCain’s pick of Palin has made them less confident in the kind of decisions he’d make as president, up 13 points since just after the selection.

User Comments

I think we can safely assume that Palin is no feminist and has failed in her primary role of luring disgruntled Hillary voters. Why is she still peddling talking points on this months after the Biden pick and the period when Hillary backers were ripe to be wooed? Did she get an old speech?
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | October 22, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Obama did not choose Hillary because she came with about 200 lbs of baggage named Bill. The concept that MCCain thought he could get all the women who were mad because Obama did not choose Hillary by selecting this rent a uterus from Alaska is absurd. We women are not interchangable. If we were I would like Angelina Jolie’s body please.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 22, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

During a week in which the Republican ticket is trying to highlight its connection to the working class and promoting its newest campaign tool, Joe the Plumber, it was revealed that Palin’s fashion budget for several weeks was more than four times the median salary of an American plumber ($37,514).
To put it another way: Palin received more valuable clothes in one month than the average American household spends on clothes in 80 years.

Posted by: hether | October 22, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Why isnt ABC cover the news that Al-Quaida wants McCain as president?
“al-Qaida will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081022/ap_on_el_pr/al_qaida_us_election_2

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 22, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Matt – I share your sentiments in general, but I am still worried that there is a “Palin effect” out there i.e. people are secretly supporters of her and may vote for the ticket, but will not admit it publicly or to pollsters. But I do not think it is correct to say that she is not a feminist. Feminists come in all shapes and forms and she cannot be discounted and disrespected just because she does not fall in line with the traditional definition.

Posted by: Gwen | October 22, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I think shes as fake as can be. its obvious Mr. Rove is at work on this one, hoping he can mislead the “short sighted women” as he likes to call them. Hes quite the manipulator. Women everywhere lets unite with the only candidate who cares about your right to choose! Lets keep this in the Supreme Court on our side! Palin isnt for womens rights or she wouldnt have been in favor of charging women for rape kits in her home town, and she would support the right to choose rather than expect women to die needlessly. Obama/Biden Time!

Posted by: Jo | October 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Palin: “When it came time for choosing, somehow Barack Obama just couldn’t bring himself to pick the woman who got 18 million votes in his primary, and that seems to be too familiar a story isn’t it?”
No, actually, governor, its never happened before… ever.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Palin is a failed gimmick that won’t go away. Palin listen up! Hillary supporters are so much smarter…and you are too dumb to even believe that they are listening to you. Girl, you got guts to keep sprouting out things that you have no clue about. Your interview was funny… I know we are dreaming and the gimmick will be on us!

Posted by: ncharge | October 22, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

This is the thing that’s driving Palin’s numbers down, and negatives up. She just keeps spouting off with this stuff that sounds, well, stupid.
Her argument is that Clinton was the runner-up in the primaries and thus should have been the running mate, but wasn’t chosen because she’s a woman.
The obvious problem with that argument is that Palin herself never got a single vote in the Republican primaries.
If the runner-up deserves to be the running mate, then why didn’t McCain pick Huckabee? Is there a glass ceiling holding down Baptist ministers?
Actually right about now, McCain might be asking himself why he didn’t pick Huckabee as well, but that’s another story.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

I liked Hillary, but I’m not going for Palin just because she is female. Hillary stood for my beliefs. Palin is against everything I believe in. I still think Obama has something planned for Hillary in his Cabinet, and he is closer to my thinking as well. Palin can take her corruption, witchhunters, and hateful racial talk back to Alaska. . .and stay there!

Posted by: Hillary Fan | October 22, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

If Palin would stop her dog-gone it, joe six-pack etc., she might appeal to more working women. As I listen to her, I am totally turned off. I want an intelligent woman like Hillary in the White House, not a silly ninny.

Posted by: sue | October 22, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Does she not know that Hillary doesn’t like her? Why is she still trying this method, to woo women voters? Oh well, as long as they aren’t talking about issues, I’m happy…The lead grows!

Posted by: PoliticsAsUsual | October 22, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Palin – Hillary will be in the White House with Obama she’s taken over Condi’s position. You are stupid not to believe that Hillary will not be a part of such a smart team as Obama’s.
We love you Hillary see you in 2009… Stick a fork in John McCain for choosing such unvetted and hurried pick as Palin.

Posted by: ncharge | October 22, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

pathetic last minute pandering,
more erratic lurching from issue to issue

Posted by: watching | October 22, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

And the simple fact is there has never been a runner-up consolation in modern times. The nominee picks his or her running mate.
For political reasons, sometimes the nominee will pick a primary competitor. Reagan with Bush comes to mind. Or even Kennedy with Johnson.
Most of the time, the nominee doesn’t do this.
To argue otherwise is to either be ignorant or to just play someone who is ignorant on TV. With Palin, I’m not sure which it is. She clearly doesn’t even understand the role of the vice president, so this kind of basic ignorance on how running mates are selected is possible.
Now I’m not saying that Biden was an obvious pick over Clinton. I was expecting Bayh and hoping for Zinni. Clinton would have been interesting, but I do think picking her would have been problemmatic. But in the end it wasn’t my call nor Palin’s. It was Obama’s call.
He made a good choice. I’d argue not a great choice, and given some of the things he’s motor-mouthed on the trail, I don’t think I’d have too much argument with that. But Obama certainly made a better choice than did McCain.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

hether – Most of my clothes come from the Salvation Army Thrift Stores, and that is so I can buy stuff for my kids. But, whatever, I think we are doomed to have McCain and Palin throw out anything they can think of rather than talk issues because they have nothing to say about the issues.

Posted by: counting crows | October 22, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Palin asks why Hillary wasn’t vetted – sorrysarah, I don’t believe it would have been necessary to vet Hillary. The question that you should ask is ” why didn’t mccain do a better job of vetting me”? If he did, you’d be back in alaska now, probably shooting moose or getting that natural gas down to the lower 48, or something that better suits than the bought and paid for wardrobe the repubs took care of for you. Cheers, don’t get caught in the landslide in 2 weeks!

Posted by: rick | October 22, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Palin reaching for other women, ” that’s hot ” LOL
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | October 22, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Sweetie Hilly is TWICE the ve p you would make.Just lookin for votes are we.
You are the worst one to say anything you are a liar a thief a crook and have nothiing unless you use your power as Gov.I sure hope they tell you to go to hell, not wanted in Alaska either….

Posted by: NH voter | October 22, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

“Our opponents think that they have the women’s vote all locked up which is a little presumptuous since only our side has a woman on the ticket,”
Presumptuous — much?

Posted by: PALIN IS EPIC LOLz | October 22, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

The reason why Obama did not choose Hillary is because it would question his legitimacy.
Remember Obama got less votes than Hillary and only got the nomination because of a flawed system and the sexist Dem hierarchy/

Posted by: Greg h | October 22, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Hillary Fan: “I still think Obama has something planned for Hillary in his Cabinet.”
I’m guessing Hillary has already said she wouldn’t want that, unless Obama was offering Secretary of State. And to be honest, Obama needs to counter some of the perceptions of his innexperience with a Secretary of State who is less out of the box. He’ll either go with a diplomatic retired general, like Jones or Zinni, or with a former ambassador.
For the same reason, I’m almost half expecting Obama to ask Gates to stay at Defense.
I’m guessing Hillary’s next goal is Senate majority leader.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Elizabeth Cady Stanton , Lucretia Mott and Susan B. Anthony, and all the other women
That fought for womens rights, you must believe that Sarah blink and wink Palin is notThe end result of your struggles. Our country has produced lots of intelligent smart women. If sarah Palin is truly the choice of the Republican party, It tells me what the party thinks about women.

Posted by: kb | October 22, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

PoliticsAsUsual – Hillary doesn’t like Palin because Bill does!

Posted by: Ed | October 22, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Wow, Palin is really grasping at straws here. Who is she to even utter the word “vet”? She is the antithesis of free-thinking, progressive women everywhere (feminist or not). For her to play the feminist card is silly if not downright insulting.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Rick, good point. It might not be the best idea for Palin to bring up the subject of vetting.
But then what she said is so annoyingly stupid, I didn’t even pick up the obvious irony there.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Sarah Palin, YOU ARE NO HILLARY CLINTON.
To tell you the truth I don’t think Hillary wanted it. She can do more good as a Senator.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Of course, Hillary Fan, those guesses are coming from someone who is sure we’d be innaugurating Vice President Bayh this January, lol.
I need to stop making predictions.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

This Hillary supporter is voting for Palin. Issues be damned. My vote is mine and I’ll use it however I see fit. Obama passed on Hillary, I’m passing on Obama.

Posted by: jose | October 22, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Oops, I meant McCain! A little Freudian slip there.

Posted by: jose | October 22, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

One of the many ironies here is that if Obama HAD picked Hillary, there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that McCain would have picked Palin!
That being said, I’ll add that I would have paid good money to see Hillary rip Caribou Barbie to shreds in a debate. Biden beat her but Hillary would have demolished her!

Posted by: MBT | October 22, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Jose – Apparently your hurt feelings come before the welfare of the country -the thinking of a truly stupid person.

Posted by: counting crows | October 22, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

I can understand how Obama took some critizisms for not choosing Clinton, but I believe that he belives he made the best choice for the country. He did. Nothing against Hillary, she is remarkable.
However, is it fair to even make comments as Palin has about this selection? How rediculous is it? And is it fair to say that McCain is more sexist than Obama since he believed picking a woman to pull Clinton voters would get him into the White House? This is outrageous.

Posted by: Jeremy | October 22, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Issues be damned? Scary.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

This Hillary supporter is voting for Palin. Issues be damned. My vote is mine and I’ll use it however I see fit. Obama passed on Hillary, I’m passing on Obama.
Posted by: jose | Oct 22, 2008 9:04:22 AM
Go ahead and vote for her and pappy. Shows me as a Hillary supporter that you didn’t care what she stood for.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

It is about time!
She has my vote.
Hey Obama work for the people, drop the corrupt influences in your life and gain some experience and then maybe we will vote for you.
Dem for Palin/McCain

Posted by: Emma | October 22, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

There is no “feminist movement” in the USA. There is a progressive womens ideology. These are vastly different things.
Gov. Palin came from a very humble backgroud and has achieved what few have. Instead of that being lauded, it is made fun of and ridiculed. Why? because she is a regular woman who made it on her own.
She didn’t have the rich family or elite connections and she holds conservative views. So,she is attacked and denegrated in the most vile ways.
The idea of a feminist is a joke. So called feminists don’t look to support all women. They only support those who share their far left views. If you’re a crack whore living on the street, they love you. If you are a college girl who chooses to sleep around and have abortions, they love you too. If you lean far left and donate money to Obama, they really love you.
However, if you are a wife and mother who has overcome all obstacles to become a Gov but hold conservative views, well your just a stupid moron who needs to get back home and take care of your kids, like a good little girl.
Sickening…

Posted by: john | October 22, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

“When it came time for choosing, somehow Barack Obama just couldn’t bring himself to pick the woman who got 18 million votes in his primary….”.
Wonder how many primary votes Palin received to be in contention for the VP spot. Since John McCain is so democratic in his choice of VP, I’d have to assume she got more than Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee!!

Posted by: Boring Republican | October 22, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

So palin comes from humble beginnings…so what’s your point? So does Obama. So do I. If that entitles me to some sort of special consideration even if I’m underqualified for a position I’d sure like to take advantage of that!
I never said she had to go to her house, but I do hope she goes home. She is pitiful.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Does anyone in the McCain camp really think that he can win by fighting hope with cynicism?
In his 71 years has he not heard of fighting fire with fire?
Does he not understand that the only people who care about acorn and ayers are the one who are already going to vote for him?

Posted by: Darth Wader | October 22, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

John at 9:07am – I could not agree with you more.

Posted by: Wendy | October 22, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Posted by: john | Oct 22, 2008 9:07:55 AM
That’s funny. You might want to read this about your golden girl.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081014/ap_on_el_pr/palin_state_ethics;_ylt=An1k_.Q0V097hZmZl4Fxyw.s0NUE

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Concerned,
My point is that you dislike her for her views. You don’t care about her accomplishments.
I know that Gov Palin is more qualified that Senator Obama. Senator Obama is a negotiator. Gov Palin is an executive who makes decisions and solves problems for a living.
You and I clearly see things from a very different view. That is perfectly fine in America.

Posted by: john | October 22, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

If she thinks she can throw the woman card in the mix and it will change my mind about her, she better think again. I’m a woman and I think she is an embrassment to woman in the US. Don’t even compare to yourself to Hillary, you are not even in her league.

Posted by: Jen | October 22, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

“If you’re a crack whore living on the street, they love you…” When did these conservatives get a lease on Jesus? Is this the same compassionate teacher who said “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone” when the Pharisees (Jewish conservatives) brought an adulteress before him to be stoned ? If he came back today, would any of today’s religious right endorse him ?

Posted by: Religious | October 22, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

If she thinks she can throw the woman card in the mix and it will change my mind about her, she better think again. I’m a woman and I think she is an embrassment to woman in the US. Don’t even compare to yourself to Hillary, you are not even in her league.
Posted by: Jen | Oct 22, 2008 9:16:37 AM
If I were Hillary I would tell her to quit using my name….lol.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

This from an Alaskian posted on another blog.
I’m an Alaskan (99705) and although we don’t want Palin back, I wouldn’t wish her or her family on the rest of the nation. This “hockey mom” and “joe six-pack” are worth over a million. Their home in Wasilla is worth more than $500,000, they have two vacation homes, a float plane,etc – you know, just the average family.She has said that she an Todd struggled, wondering how they could afford health care – also not true. Todd is 1/8 Yupik eskimo, and up here that’s like waving a platinum Visa card. Todd and the kids get free healthcare as well as shareholder checks from big oil (all natives do). Here’s the deal – I don’t care what she owns, what she spends, or where she lives – but she’s a liar. John McCain wears $500 shoes, but he pays for them himself and doesn’t lie about it. I’m sure that the Obama’s wear clothes and shoes that are far more expensive than you or I purchase – but they pay for it themselves and they don’t lie about it. See a theme? Palin has charged our state with nearly $25,000 in travel expenses for her kids , and doctored the expense reports to say that the kids were on “official business” She’s a liar. I remember her when she was just Sarah Heath, a really bad sports reporter – but at least then she wasn’t costing Alaskan citizens money. She brags about selling off the state plane – yeah, she did. AT A LOSS TO THE STATE. Good call, Sarah. She has sent thousands of Alaskan gas line jobs to Canada, abused her power, violated ethics codes, and is basically drunk on seeing her face on the cover of magazines. Folks, she is simply NOT ready or qualified to be VP. It’s laughable when posters here say that of you don’t like Palin it’s because you’re jealous of her “brains and beauty”. She placed third in a Miss Alaska pageant, came back the next year trying to compete as Miss Big Lake and didn’t make the top ten. We’ve seen her struggle to string together a coherent sentence while trying to stick to her flashcard talking points – I just can’t find anything to be jealous about. Besides, I’d rather have a really ugly, but wise VP any day. What do looks have to do with being qualified? Those posts are merely the last gasps of a dying campaign that’s out of ammunition. Sorry folks, it’s over. Obama-Biden ’08.

Posted by: Jen | October 22, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

My recent opinion of this Palin character has gone from “terrible” to “worse than terrible” than as the days go on. I am strongly of the belief that she’s actually dangerous. She’d be better off by not saying anything further at all.

Posted by: Steve D | October 22, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

John,
Accomplishments are great. But where you and I disagree is whether her accomplishments make her suitable for office. I think they do not.
Of course I have concerns about her views. I disagree with McCain about 85% of the time. Are you suggesting that I put views aside and vote for her because she is a woman with some modest accomplishments?
She is not ready for this responsibility and does not represent me as a citizen or as a woman.
Nuff said.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

“You and I clearly see things from a very different view. That is perfectly fine in America.”
Which America are you referring to, John? The “real America” that Palin keeps talking about? I had always thought that we were ALL Americans, even those, like me, who live in big cities. But it seems Palin has other ideas on that. These inane references to “real America”, “small town values”, “elitists” etc show that McCain and Palin feel they have to divide the country even more, in order to win the election. Country first? Hah!
Have we learned nothing from the the last eight disastrous years?

Posted by: MBT | October 22, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

I’m not religious. I just have eyes and can see. Where did I say anything about God?
I don’t have those answers for you.
What I do know is that I know many women just like Gov Palin. They are strong and accomplished. She is a Gov and yet that is a joke to the left because she has a different view point.
It matters very little whether we agree or not. I believe that there are more people who view her favorably than what many want to believe. I think this will be proven soon.

Posted by: john | October 22, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Jwench – I totally agreed with you. Hillary should give her a friendly little phone call and tell her to never use her name again!!!

Posted by: Jen | October 22, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

It is funny how Americans will judge Sen Palin’s abilty and qualifications to run this country, even though she is much more qualified than Obama. They are afraid to judge Obi like that, why? Is is because he is a man. Stupid American women, you are always lowering your standards and this time you are proving you will always be second base. Ha Ha

Posted by: Helen Doon | October 22, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Palin should keep Hillary’s name out of her mouth. She is not worthy.

Posted by: Myron | October 22, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

I am so sick of hearing this “elitist” BS. I grew up in a small town, got myself through non-Ivy league schools and am now successful. This woman holds no sway on me. Why? Because she doesn’t know anything, and she doesn’t really care that she doesn’t know anything. I do not want any of my leaders winking at me or dropping their ‘g’s, I want someone with intellectual curiosity. She is the worst kind of joke I could imagine for feminism. You HRC supporters that are supporting her are delusional. She is no HRC. She is not even fit to be mentioned in the same sentence.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Heather said:
“…she doesn’t know anything, and she doesn’t really care that she doesn’t know anything.”
Spoken for truth.
It’s willfull ignorance. My favorite is her insistance that she hasn’t violated any ethics, even though a bi-partisan investigational report says otherwise…it’s laughable.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

By America I mean all of us. I believe in your right to disagree with me. I hope you will extend me that too.
I love my country and my countrymen. I want America to succeed for each and every American. I am not sure how you read into my post that I somehow held you apart because I respect Gov Palin and others do not.
I am sure you are a reasonable person and feel justified in your opinion. I was not attacking you or anyone else. I just hold the view that if Gov Palin held views like Speaker Pelosi (who is also a mother of 5 by the way) she would be a “feminist hero”.
Believe what you will. I hold no ill will against my country or countrymen, regardless if I agree with them or not.

Posted by: john | October 22, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Jwench – I totally agreed with you. Hillary should give her a friendly little phone call and tell her to never use her name again!!!
Posted by: Jen | Oct 22, 2008 9:23:42 AM
LOL…I agree. One thing Hillary has intelligence, something Sarah dear doesn’t have.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

People are afraid to admit they will not vote for obama. tell that to a pollster or media person and you get the Joe the plumber treatment.
The Bradley effect will now be known as The Joe the plumber effect.

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

This is the perfect time to point out Biden vs Hillary. Biden is the Gaffesmeister of all Gaffemeisters.
Tearing down his running mate every step of the way. The man prides himself on his “high IQ” but it is evident that Biden isn’t any smarter than the Moose that Palin has hunted. Palin is 1000 times more qualified to be VP and about million times more qualified than Obama who has ZERO experience which is why he has nothing to show for it. Obama has NO EXPERIENCE AND NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT. totally unqualified for the position of President.

Posted by: alain | October 22, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

“Palin should keep Hillary’s name out of her mouth. She is not worthy”
typical Obama thug speak. silence free speech in America.
PUMA for McCain

Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Way to go Sarah palin. I can hear the fear of Obama in Biden’s voice. He like many of us are afraid of what might happen if (GOD FORBID) Obama is elected. Biden has a son in harms way , and I am sure he would feel safer with John mcCain as president.
Thanks Sarah Palin for being the source of breaking news. The media has failed, and has sent many of us away. Face it, we simply can not trust them anymore than we can trust Obama.
Thanks Sarah Palin for being the only canditate with Commander in Chief experience. Thanks for being the Commander in chief of the only full time active duty National Guard.
Thanks for protecting our border with Russia. Thanks for being possibly the most energy informed person in America.
Boy, doesn’t that make you a better canditate. Doesn’t that make McCain Palin the only choice for President/Vice president
JJS

Posted by: joseph | October 22, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Tell Sarah Palin she doesn’t know what she is talking aobut. Her running mate has never supported women’s issues!! Go check the votes. As for Sarah herself in Alaska – never supported woman issues!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | October 22, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Geevill,
Why would people be afraid to admit they’re voting for McCain? It makes no sense. Analysts say the Bradley effect has little or no bearing. Otherwise Hillary would have won the primaries. You’re grasping. Try harder.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

john’s point isn’t that she deserves an automatic pass on the vetting but that she does not deserve to be automatically ridiculed just because she isn’t an east coast liberal.
My god, this lady has negotiated a very tricky agreement with oil companies, a foreign government, various local interests etc. and she doesn’t seem to get an ounce of credit. Mind you, she did this before “energy independence” became the latest fad in the liberal cocktail circuit.
If there’s any doubt that the media is sexist, their treatment of Hillary and Palin have totally exposed that.

Posted by: Fob | October 22, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Obama needs to collect higher taxes on those making $75,000.00 if he is going to pay for his plans of wealth redistribution–WSJ—- In all, three out of every five voters will pay little or nothing in income taxes under Mr. Obama’s plans and gain when taxes rise on the 40% that already pays 95% of income tax revenues.The plunder that the Democrats plan to extract from the “very rich” — the 5% that earn more than $250,000 and who already pay 60% of the federal income tax bill — will never stretch to cover the expansive programs Mr. Obama promises.What next? A core group of Obama enthusiasts — those educated professionals who applaud the “fairness” of their candidate’s tax plans — will soon see their $100,000-$150,000 incomes targeted. As entitlements expand and a self-interested majority votes, the higher tax brackets will kick in at lower levels down the ladder, all the way to households with a $75,000 income.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 22, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

alain, if you believe that Palin is qualified, there is something terribly wrong with you. She just announced that the VP runs the Senate, and can “get in there and make good policy decisions”. We should expect our presidential candidates to at least read the US Constitution. Your post is complete rubbish.
concerned, Yes, if liking to read and wanting to learn is elitist, then I am an elite. This woman is perfectly happy to spew talking points, regardless of their validity, and is therefore necessarily disqualified from the position because of it.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

This article on honesty and experience explain EXACTLY why I just cast my vote for McCain:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/31228024.html
In these times of peril, the last thing we need is a hording money-hungry crook to “profit” from the downfalls of America!
Really, Obama will be tested with a crisis not six months after taking office? NO THANKS BUDDY!!

Posted by: Crimson | October 22, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

“Palin should keep Hillary’s name out of her mouth. She is not worthy”
typical Obama thug speak. silence free speech in America.
PUMA for McCain
Posted by: geevill | Oct 22, 2008 9:31:45 AM
Geevil the little PUMA troll. Go back under the bridge.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

wow- so many negative remarks about Palin…. she has not made any daily Gaffes like your senator Biden, and he is a heartbeat away from the presidency if Obama is elected… ABC is so in the tank for Obama and they grossly distort the truth.. my only happiness is knowing that more and more viewers are turned off by ABC, CBS, NBC and their ratings are sinking http://www.drudge.com
FYI: Obama is not a Messiah, he is a man with the least experience of all 3.

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Why is Palin not feminist? BEcause she happened to have children? How many children do you have to have not to qualify for the feminist label?
I’m sorry for the American women who can’t see out of the box. They keep on knocking each other and let me tell you. That’s not feminist.
But Palin is right. She’s telling the truth and that’s what hurts the Obama’s suporters and the wanna be feminists.
Obama camp didn’t pick Hillary because they’re sexist. This is a sexist, sexist society and the Republicans proved to be less sexist then the so called progressives. When it comes to woman’s rights the Democrats are not progressive.

Posted by: dina | October 22, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Fob,
I am not all that impressed with her dealings with the oil companies (She pummeled opponents for giving oil companies and other businesses too much control of state government. Yet she appointed the founder of an engineering firm that received $6.8 million in state business as head of the transportation department.) She didn’t fight the bridge to nowhere, she gave up on it when funding was cut off, and regarding the gas pipeline, BP is more responsible for what has been accomplished (which isn’t much- they don’t own the land, they don’t have the permits and building won’t begin for years to come).
Couple that with her extreme evangelical views and I can’t bring myself to consider her.
See? I’ve done the homework, and McCain/Palin comes up short.
It has nothing to do with sexism- that’s just the sound of a desperate campaign.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

If we are talking about not vetting someone, it should be about McCain’s selection of Palin. He threw away the race with that pick. Palin is no Hillary. I find Palin an embarrassment to professional and independent women – her amateur antics during the debate were absolutely juvenile.

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

This is the first time I’ve read this blog and was I surprised? Not really. It is the most far left blog I’ve ever encountered. Made up of the most vile responses one could imagine. As a democrat, I’m embarrassed at the tone and content of some of the replies. What has happen to civility to get one’s point across? I see it’s long gone on this blog

Posted by: Joseph Leonardo | October 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I think it is funny that she can talk about how much equality, freedom and power she wants to hand over to women when she also thinks that the government and religion should have complete control of their private parts.

Posted by: Seth | October 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Given her comment on the VP’s job, ask yourself this: Could Sarah Palin pass the test to become a US citizen?
It is laughable that she would claim to be better qualified than Barack or Joe Biden. LAUGHABLE!!

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Obama camp didn’t pick Hillary because they’re sexist. This is a sexist, sexist society and the Republicans proved to be less sexist then the so called progressives. When it comes to woman’s rights the Democrats are not progressive.
Posted by: dina | Oct 22, 2008 9:39:09 AM
I don’t think Hillary wanted it. So McCain picks a woman thinking that just because we both have vejay jays that we will vote for her? I find it insulting that he would even think women are that stupid.
I am sorry she is not and never will be of the caliber of Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Ms. Palin’s right…Obama didn’t pick the person who got the second-most number of votes in the primaries (and most presidential candidates don’t). For that matter, McCain didn’t pick Romney, or Huckabee, each of whom could claim to have gotten second place in the Republican primaries. The difference is that Obama obviously chose the best fit, and didn’t try to shoe-horn a woman into the job just because she is a woman. Unlike a certain Republican nominee, who obviously chose the wrong person for the job just because she was female and ultra-right-wing.
Joe Biden may not be the best of the best, but he’s a heckovalot better than Palin ever could be.

Posted by: Nacho | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Dina,
You know Palin wants to overturn Roe v Wade, right? You know she is against sex education and wants to teach creationism in schools….do you really think she’s a feminist? Wow.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Anyone notice a pattern with the majority of comments here?? Me too…
What is incredible to me, is that people that claim to support Obama are vitriolic and insistently disingenuous.
I thought that Obama was supposed be above dirty campaigning, but his supporters have been ugly since day one. Talk about a disconnect.
Obama is inspiring? All I see is that he inspires people to be ugly in order to defend him. That is not positive leadership.

Posted by: Leisa | October 22, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

This is the first time I’ve read this blog and was I surprised? Not really. It is the most far left blog I’ve ever encountered. Made up of the most vile responses one could imagine. As a democrat, I’m embarrassed at the tone and content of some of the replies. What has happen to civility to get one’s point across? I see it’s long gone on this blog
Posted by: Joseph Leonardo | Oct 22, 2008 9:42:30 AM
Then you didn’t see the responses from the GOP posters when Colin Powell announced his endoresement.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Palin slams Obama for passing over Clinton? What about McCain passing over Romney for Palin? That’s the real tragedy and the reason why McCain will lose this election.

Posted by: Drew Hoffman | October 22, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

You do know Sarah that if Obama had picked Hillary Clinton you would be up in Alaska now where nobody down here ever heard of you shooting defenseless wolves from an airplane and working on banning more books in libraries.
You were picked by McCain because he thought women would follow any woman like sheep to the polls which does show his lack of respect for women…

Posted by: KERRY | October 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Well at least Palin’s got the wardrobe, hair and makeup down! That cost ought to go over well with Joe the Plumber!

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Palin insults women and Hillary anytime she uses Hillary’s name in her useless attacks. McSame and Failin will try anything to discredit the Obama/Biden ticket. Obama/Biden will prevail in a landslide victory for Americans who cherish our country, our beloved Constitution, Women’s Rights, Human Rights and policies of inclusion not division. Good riddance to the angry old soldier who sold his soul when he nominated Palin who doesn’t represent the views of any of Hillary’s supporters! McSame and Failin insult the American public with their ridiculous tactics – no strategy! Policies that change daily and they can’t even agree on them! Failin still doesn’t even know what a VP does! Soon they’ll be gone and good riddance! We’ll then move on to solve the host of problems the failed Bush policies have created and dumped on us! Vote Obama/Biden!

Posted by: BevM | October 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Posted by: Leisa | Oct 22, 2008 9:44:34 AM
Oh please, the amount of trash and lies and hateful posts by the GOP supporters is 10 x’s worse. Go over and read the blogs on Colin Powells endoresement.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Obama’s ethics violations in IL State Senate. Where’s the media?
Apparently, on Obama’s released tax records, he discloses income from speaking fees. The problem? Accepting payment for speaking fees when you’re a legislator is AGAINST Illinois state law.
Apparently, as an Illinois state legislator through 2004, Barack was PROHIBITED from taking honoraria for speaking under the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act.
But what about Barack Obama’s 2000 and 2002 tax returns?
2000: On his 2000 Schedule C-EZ, Barack reported that he received $16,500 as a “Foundation director/Educational speaker.”
2001: On his 2001 Schedule C-EZ, Barack reported $98,158 from a Chicago law firm, Miner, Barnhill, for “Legal services/attorney” (and nothing for speaking).
2002: On his 2002 Schedule C, Barack reported $34,491 for “LEGAL SERVCES / SPEAKING FEES.”
These “speaking fees” are in addition to the amounts that Barack was paid as an employee, a lecturer at the University of Chicago, reported on the first page of his 1040s.
That’s not change we can believe in.
Just to sum up, the media can find Joe the Plumber’s tax woes within 24 hours of his having dared to question The One’s narrative, but they can’t find a clear ethical violation in the released records of a man who has been campaigning for President for TWO YEARS now.
Another truth-telling moment brought to you by our fair and objective “tanning bed” news media.

Posted by: Hey, while we're at it, could the media actually vet Barack Obama?? | October 22, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

It’s a blog; get over it. Happens on all them.

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

How misinformed most of you are!
Palin attracts women who are like her. Women who are strong, independent,confidante, educated, motivated with both morals and values.
We know that these traits infuriate those of you who rely on others for information without the ability to think for yourselves. You are good at regurgitating someone else’s talking points without caring or knowing the facts!!!
In addition, your right she is not like Hillary. She has succeeded on her own without the ride on her husbands skirt.
A vote for Obama is a vote for censorship!
A vote for Obama is a vote against Freedom!!
A vote for Obama is a vote for Socialism!
A vote for Obama is a vote for entitlement and against hard work!!!!

Posted by: JP | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Palin brings in thousands and thousands of people at her rallies, so ABC are you going to report that? you women who tear her down, shame on you. i guess the real defination of feminist are jealous bitter women who tear down other women… i have a co worker who is black and he is voting forObama because he is black, that is his only reason… when it is a women, you become haters and you set successful women back to the beginning when we were worthless and beneath men, you are now valiadating those times… all women who are successful all have different opnions and different approaches,m who cares if she has a different value as yours, you should be behind a successful woman!! YOU ARE NOT TRUE FEMINIST FOR TEARING DOWN A SUCCESSFUL WOMAN

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

People need to wake up. Obama is not talking about taking Joe the Plumbers money and giving it to people without jobs. That is ridiculous and untrue. He is talking about Mega rich people who are raking in obscene profits while paying their workers minimum wage. If they complain too loud about the low wages, they look for workers in India or China to do the work so they can make even higher profit.
Think about the Walmart hiers making billions a year while their workers can’t pay rent. Think about mortgage and finance CEO’s with paychecks of 487 million over three years while they rape homeowners. Think about Oil execs making 500 billion a year in profit while they bleed America dry.
Wake up people. These mega rich 1-5% don’t let ANYTHING trickle down. They rape the American worker for everything they can and they DON’T PAY TAXES! They write off losses, find every loophole and then have folks like McCain subsidize them. AND YES … paying taxes is patriotic!! It is how we fund America. The problem is that the middle class carries the burden while the mega-rich carry off the rewards.

Posted by: DaveinColorado | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

does this idiot Palin really believes that the Hillary supporters are listening to her? Does she really believes that Hillary and her followers would like to see her as president? Hillary Clinton is much too smart to fall into her trap, I respect Hillary as a politician and woman , but this idiot of Palin ,she is a disgrace to women she should go back to the AIP

Posted by: joe | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Elizabeth Cady Stanton , Lucretia Mott and Susan B. Anthony, and all the other women
That fought for womens rights, you must believe that Sarah blink and wink Palin is not The end result of your struggles. Our country has produced lots of intelligent smart women. If sarah Palin is truly the choice of the Republican party, It tells me what the party thinks about women.

Posted by: kb | October 22, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Palin’s far from squeaky clean. Complete abuse of power happening in Alaska on a variety of fronts.

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Am I the only middle-aged white woman who supports Obama and is glad he didn’t choose Hillary as his running mate? His presidency wouldn’t have been his own with Bill overshadowing him and trying to turn him into a Clinton puppet. Obama is intelligent and made the right choice in choosing someone else.
McCain, on the other hand, made the wrong choice. He sought gender as the main qualification and chose a candidate who is unqualified, undignified, and unconscionable. It was a reckless decision.

Posted by: Judy | October 22, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

How ironic – - Palin is slamming Obama for NOT considering Hillary as a running mate; meanwhile the whole world is slamming McCain for considering Palin as a running mate.

Posted by: pamm | October 22, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It’s interesting to me that she can go on and on about wanting to work for women’s rights, that Obama hasn’t done anything for women, etc., when Biden has probably done more work to protect women’s rights than any of other candidates running – including those who ran during the primaries. Certainly, Obama has done something great by selecting him for his VP. Somehow I suspect that she has no idea about this history. And it’s sad too that so few Americans know about the work he did in general. There is a great New Republic article about this.

Posted by: HJL | October 22, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Just count the posters above attacking Palin’s speech and see how many are men. Liberal men love to talk about how much they support women but it’s clear that most of them don’t really respect us. That’s why Obama pays his female staff less than his male staff.
And to Paul, YES it has actually happened before that a female presidential candidate in the primaries was not picked as running-mate by the nominee. Here are just a few: Patsy Mink, Bella Abzug, and Pat Schroeder, for the Democrats and Elizabeth Dole for the Republicans.
Of these, Pat Schroeder and Elizabeth Dole were serious candidates with national support, but they were passed over by their party’s nominee. So Palin is right! It is a too familiar story.

Posted by: Dayana Martinez | October 22, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Shame on you Matt for slamming Hillary Clinton at the time Obama needs all the help he can get.I was a Hillary supporter and she had managed to bring me to the Obama train and I have paid my fare to the Obama campaign.Keep your Hillary baggage stuff because the primaries had been over and we are all democrates so shooting your mouth on Hillary at this time is not what even the Obama campaign needs.

Posted by: tutu | October 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Al Queda is playing a “reverse psychology” game with the American people. They think that if they say they want McCain that we won’t vote for McCain because he is the “terrorists” candidate. Actually, Hamas as well as many other terrorist groups have endorsed Obama. Sarah Palin is just reminding the country that Obama didn’t choose the most qualified person for veep, Hillary Clinton. Biden is nothing but a gaffe master. I’m extremely concerned about this guy being involved in our foreign affairs. Anybody ever heard the expression, “Loose lips sink ships?” This guy’s lips flutter like a paddlewheel on a riverboat!

Posted by: JKIR | October 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

“Palin brings in thousands and thousands of people at her rallies, so ABC are you going to report that…”
Wow! Is Palin then “the world’s greatest celebrity”? I thought Johnny had awarded that to Obama.

Posted by: Celebrity | October 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

TELL’EM SARAH!
WHY DID OBAMA NOT EVEN VET HILLARY? WHY IN THIS CAMPAIGN DID THE DEMOCRATS AND OBAMA, THE SO-CALLED CHAMPIONS FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS, CONTINUOUSLY BASH AND DEMEANOR WOMEN.
OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ARE THE TRUE SEXIST AND RACIST!

Posted by: TINA | October 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Palin’s really is an impressive politician. It’s a shame that the only successful executive in the bunch is at the bottom of the ticket!
I’d also like to see someone with some actual clean-government street cred in the White House. McCain’s got some of that, but this woman pretty much beat the corruption out of the Alaska Republican Party with a pipe wrench.

Posted by: Joe | October 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

“YOU ARE NOT TRUE FEMINIST FOR TEARING DOWN A SUCCESSFUL WOMAN”
I am a feminist for holding Sarah Palin to the same standard as the other candidates. Her obvious lack of knowledge of the most simple issues is astounding. She has no idea what the Constitution says, she cannot name a Supreme Court case other than Roe v. Wade. She has learned a speech and she delivers it well. There is not a unique thought in her head.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I was truly disappointed to see that Obama yet again caused a disconnect from what he says and what he does. How can he even muster the audacity to tout support for women when he’s one of the culprits for unequal pay?!?!
I’m not voting for him because I just can take his word for it, I can’t take McCain’s either but I’ve seen McCain and Palin’s actual records (outside of the careless media-really it’s a joke) that showed that they will follow through with what they say! That’s all that matters anyway! Meanwhile the McCain team pays women equal wage.
BTW: This race isn’t remotely over- the polls have even less statistical integrity than the media itself these days.
WOMEN FOR MCCAIN!

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I am a Hillary supporter who is giving my vote to McCain/ Palin. Obama and the Democrats did nothing but make ignorant comments towards women.

Posted by: gina | October 22, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

“Anybody ever heard the expression, “Loose lips sink ships?” This guy’s lips flutter like a paddlewheel on a riverboat!”
Bam, bam bam Iran – You go ole’ Johnny boy !! Your lips at least are sealed.

Posted by: Sealed lips | October 22, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Palin attracts women who are like her. Women who are strong, independent,confidante, educated, motivated with both morals and values.
We know that these traits infuriate those of you who rely on others for information without the ability to think for yourselves. You are good at regurgitating someone else’s talking points without caring or knowing the facts!!!
Posted by: JP | Oct 22, 2008 9:51:18 AM
Ummm…no all of us confident,intellgent successful women DO NOT want to be just like Sarah. I am sorry but this woman is a first class twit. She has morals???? The Ethics queen? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081014/ap_on_el_pr/palin_state_ethics;_ylt=An1k_.Q0V097hZmZl4Fxyw.s0NUE
Quit insulting us women who have a clue.
As far as your comment about Hillary, 18 million people disagree with you.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Someone with some actual clean-government street cred in the White House?
Oh there you go Joe, you better read the news a little better!

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

If anyone believes Palin or McCain is an advocate for women’s rights or equal pay for equal work, they should have their head examined!

Posted by: karen | October 22, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE ALREADY HAD WOMEN PRESIDENT, EVEN 3RD WORLD COUNTRIES.
WHY IS THE US LAGGING 200 YEARS BEHIND?

Posted by: Kim | October 22, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Somebody said “who cares if she has a different value as yours, you should be behind a successful woman!! YOU ARE NOT TRUE FEMINIST FOR TEARING DOWN A SUCCESSFUL WOMAN”
Wow. That sounds very ignorant.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Judy – “am I the only middle-aged white woman who supports Obama and is glad he didn’t choose Hillary as his running mate? ” I am with you!

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Concerned,
Yours is s typical response that every woman can relate to. When a woman does something positive, it is belittled and diminished by stating that she had nothing to do with it, others also helped etc. etc. Bottomline is there was only one person who had the power to negotiate the agreement – that was GOVERNOR Sarah Palin. And she showed that she could use that office to do some good, even if nobody is watching. I mean was it even a major news item in the American press when this was accomplished? YOu might think it is not much but whenever somebody takes a positive step toward energy indepedence (be it via the conventional route or the alternate route) they have my highest regard.
You may not want to see the obvious just because a conservative WOMAN has accomplished it but its your prerogative to bury your head in the sand. I won’t stand in your way.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Somebody tell Palin she’s on the side that doesn’t even seem to support equal pay. Not to mention they think they can police my womb. Then there’s that little issue of rape kids not being funded in Alaska. Yo – that’s really supportive of women? BOTTOM LINE? On Obama’s site there’s an “issues” area for women. They’re not mentioned on McCain’s site. I’d say that is very telling. You’d think they’d have been smart enough to add a column once they put her on the ticket???

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The list is : two wars at disarray, collapsing banking system, raising unemployment, credit crunch, 3rd world countries on the way to the moon while we retire from space, insane national debt, tarnished International reputation, religious tenshions on the rise even in side CHristianity, and racisim sticking its head out, then the wishful veep says…..what? What the heck is McCain doing? Karl Rove needs to go home, stay home, and shut his big car hood, until this is over on November.

Posted by: Sam, Wisconsin | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

MOST COUNTRIES HAVE ALREADY HAD WOMEN PRESIDENTS, EVEN 3RD WORLD COUNTRIES.
WHY IS THE US LAGGING 200 YEARS BEHIND?

Posted by: KIM | October 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

It’s a shame that many women will be suckered in by the rhetoric of a women who LIED and then FALSIFIED government records to support her families travel expenses, charged to the people of Alaska for her minor children. Just how much help can minor children be in the running of state business? Now she contradicts the actions of her boss, John McCain, who chose NOT TO EVEN SHOW UP in the Senate to vote on the “Lily Ledbetter Equal Pay for Equal Work for Women Act”, but instead chose to release a statement from the fundraiser he was attending the day this Senate vote was taking place, stating this act would harm businesses because he feared it would open avenues allowing women who felt they had been wronged by not being paid equally to a man doing the same job, to file lawsuits. I find it hard to believe that any working woman would vote for this ticket, any woman who does most certainly has not done research on the issues supported by McCain/Palin.

Posted by: devilkev | October 22, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

I’m a Hillary supporter and know that Palin is opposed to most of my views, however you’d better believe I’m going to vote for her. This vote is about so much more than the 2008 election. It is about teaching both parties that a woman has to be in it. It is a disgrace that there are third world countries like Rwanda with female presidents and we just can’t manage it. Palin’s speech was great–even if Obama didn’t pick Hillary for VP, he knew about the PUMA movement and as an FU to women everywhere he didn’t even vet a single female VP candidate. Talk about a sexist pig!
Palin ’08
An All Female Ticket ’12
Women need to stick together to get ourselves into power. We need to show that we are a voting bloc that must be catered to!!

Posted by: Odyssey | October 22, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

John- I respect your views and no one I know would question your right to express them. I also see one America…and it includes big city residents, homosexuals, intellectuals, aetheists, liberals and so on.
That being said, why do you support a candidate that DOES see two Americas? Palin and McCain comments about the “real America” and “small town values” tell us that they view parts of this country as amoral and anti-American.
I am quite tired of being told that I am not patriotic b/c I have steadfastly opposed an immoral war in Iraq, as well as the majority of republican policies that have been advanced the last 8 years and continue to be advanced by McC/P.
I am an American and will love this country, even if (heaven forbid) McC wins and even if (heaven truly forbid) McC dies in office and Palin is president. But heaven help us ALL if either event comes to pass.

Posted by: MBT | October 22, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Susan-1: You don’t even know the facts. Stop talking. McCain does pay equal wages to women, it’s the “Messiah” who doesn’t pay women as much

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Palin attracts women who are like her. Women who are strong, independent,confidante, educated, motivated with both morals and values.
We know that these traits infuriate those of you who rely on others for information without the ability to think for yourselves. You are good at regurgitating someone else’s talking points without caring or knowing the facts!!!
Posted by: JP | Oct 22, 2008 9:51:18 AM
****************************
You mean Palin attracts biotches? Let’s face it – that’s what she sounds like out there. The woman is the type of woman I try to stay away from.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I’ll be glad when this election is over and Palin can go back to Alaska, where we can forget about her. This woman is a loose canon with an expense account. She has managed to run McCain’s campaign right off the road and into a ditch.

Posted by: AZMac | October 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

am a Hillary supporter who is giving my vote to McCain/ Palin. Obama and the Democrats did nothing but make ignorant comments towards women.
Posted by: gina | Oct 22, 2008 9:59:26 AM
Gina, how can you vote for people who do not share the same vision that Hillary had for this country. The primaries are over, it’s done. Even Hillary has gotten over it. I suggest you do the same.
I was a Hillary supporter who saw that McCain is no good for this country and with his pick of Palin it just reinforces that.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Susan–They figure they don’t need to talk about women’s issues since they put an actual vagina on the ticket. Ridiculous. I am with you. Nobody will take away my reproductive rights, especially a woman.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I am a feminist for holding Sarah Palin to the same standard as the other candidates. Her obvious lack of knowledge of the most simple issues is astounding. She has no idea what the Constitution says, she cannot name a Supreme Court case other than Roe v. Wade. She has learned a speech and she delivers it well. There is not a unique thought in her head.—
says who? katie Couric? she was interviewed by Cameron on Fox and she was able to name 3 Supreme court cases easily. the problem with katie Couric grossly distorted interview is that they had to edit 2 hours worth of interview into 6 mins, remember when a MSM glorifies a messiah, they trash and tear down his opponents which ABC has done so greatly. Biden made 10 misstatements during the VP debate.. Katie couric interivews him and they he talks about how during the great depression FDR got on TV to calm the people down andKatie goes “ohh how yiou are soo in tune with the american people” ummm, FDR was not president and there was TV like what we have now.. woiw your brillant Couric is feeding you distorted lies….
Roe Vs. wade would be hard to be overturn. Palin stated she wants to see the number of Abortion reduced, is that wrong? or are you excited that there are like 40 million babies aborted a year?? are you excited that Obama permits partial birth and that if a babie survives the doctor puts that aborted baby in a closet to die? does that make you a proud feminist for supporting that?
Biden is a joke. Obama has no exepreince at all

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Some of Hillary’s top strategists have been working with Obama for months now. Also Hillary’s contributers have been helping the Obama/Biden ticket. Hillary has been campaigning not only for Obama/Biden ticket but for Demcocrats running for office around the country. Since the 2006 elections the Republicans as a minority in both the Senate and Congress have shown that they can block any major bills they want too. So common sense says that after the 2008 elections this government will still be divided it just the way the constitution was set up. So Hillary helping all the Democrats running for office helps. Hillary and Obama campaigning in Florida together had me checking out Sarah Silverman’s video “The Great Schlep” :-D. Its great to see all the artists coming out in support for Obama when he really needed the help. Earlier during the Democratic primaries it was some of the first artists Bruce Springsteen, Robert De Niro and the “Yes we Can” musical video artists who were the first to come to Obama’s defense when he really needed the help and they inspired us all. Hillary did all us New Yorkers proud. Go Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Cooday | October 22, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Fob,
You continue to misunderstand me. I am all for a strong woman accomplishing things. But, when considering a candidate for VP it is within my right (and I would dare say it is every voter’s responsibility) to have a clear understanding of the candidate’s actual role in the policies (s)he uses to demonstrate his/her ability to fulfill the role (s)he seeks to fill.
Having done that, she comes up short.
Now, let me also say that I can admire a woman or a man for mild success and achievement, but I cannot SETTLE for that level in a candidate for VP.
We need to hold all these candidates up to a higher standard. And I would suggest that people aren’t doing that with Palin simply because they’re playing the woman card.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Hey Joe, There were 5 prominent Hillary supporters supporting McCain/Palin on that stage. If you had at least a half a brain in your head and one ounce of intellectual honesty, you’d realize that getting McCain elected allows Hillary to run in 2012 with a VERY good chance of becoming the first female president.
But you WANT Obama to win so Hillary will be too old to run in 2016. You are a misogynist buttwipe!

Posted by: CS | October 22, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Susan-1: You don’t even know the facts. Stop talking. McCain does pay equal wages to women, it’s the “Messiah” who doesn’t pay women as much
Posted by: esm | Oct 22, 2008 10:03:54 AM
SHe’s not talking about campaign workers, she is talking about all the time he has been in the Senate. He has not been good on women’s issues. The same guy that called his wife the “c” word. Real stand up guy for women.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Jwench and Jwitch,
Its halloween time so I need to include all…
posting obviously biased articles that have no sense of balance does not move the needle one bit.
You’d have more credibility if you stacked up these so-called issues with Obama’s all-star starting line up of Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Phleger, and Farrakhan.
I’d play Wright as Center.
Phleger and Rezko as forwards.
Ayers and Farakhan as point guards.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I can certainly believe that she charged the “good folks of Alaska” for thing she shouldn’t have. Interestingly enough no one is really picking up this story. And what about the RNC paying to clothe her and the family for the public appearances, they would have been better off to let her come out in her own clothes, then she really could have been like the rest of us. I think she is an illusion for that RNC there. She should be investigated again for her ethical behavior and mis-management of funds in Alaska. And really, she should know what the VP does in the Senate by now, but no she made another boo boo this week about that too.

Posted by: atrst | October 22, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

These unfair attacks on Palin in this thread are made by those who will never learn from the past.
Don’t you remember each time the Democrats have been in power what they gave us? Inflation,more White Flight and more free moneys for minorities.
All those Whites who are going to vote for Obama the’re going to get the surprise of their life.
But will it be a surprise? Not really. We already know what will come from this good talker but inefficient,and until recently, unknown charlatan.If Obama wins, legislation will stall in Congress because of his attitude and inexperience.
It’s not that I that I’m 100% supportive of McCain but ,I feel, that he is the lesser of the two evils.Anybody who supports illegal immigration of third world people is an evil and not a Patriot.
I feel sorry and angry at all those Whites who have even considered this Obama.

Posted by: Richard | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

I’m a self proclaimed feminist, lesbian lawyer and democrat who supports McCain/Palin. I do not believe that the perfect feminist is an Ivy League grad. I can look past the dropped g’s.
I’m taxed at the Single HOH rate, am drowning in student loan debt with 3 little kids to feed. A tax increase for me will be devastating to our monthly budget and I will be in the Obama’s “wealthy” category for the first time in my life. I’m not prepared to spread that “wealth” around in lieu of paying off debt and saving for my kids college.
On the other hand, I won’t accept a federal same-sex marriage ban and believe in expanded healthcare.
Tough decision.

Posted by: SAS | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Palin asks, “How it is for so many American women that the qualifications are there, but for some reason the promotion never comes?”
I ask, “How is it that for some people the promotion always comes even though the qualifications aren’t there?”

Posted by: Anonymous | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Palin is pathetic.

Posted by: Mike | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Hey Joe, There were 5 prominent Hillary supporters supporting McCain/Palin on that stage. If you had at least a half a brain in your head and one ounce of intellectual honesty, you’d realize that getting McCain elected allows Hillary to run in 2012 with a VERY good chance of becoming the first female president.
But you WANT Obama to win so Hillary will be too old to run in 2016. You are a misogynist buttwipe!
Posted by: CS | Oct 22, 2008 10:08:06 AM
Newsflash. She said there is zero chance of her running again. She wants to stay in the Senate where she can do the most good.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

esm here are your facts -
McCain has repeatedly voted no on issues pertaining to birth control and abortion.
McCain voted no on bills aimed at stopping domestic violence against women. This includes bills aimed at children who suffer as a result of domestic violence.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

McCain pays women more than Obama has… it was posted on drudge a while back.
i am a little suspicous of the timing of Obama leaving the campagin to go see his grandma who he has visited once in 17 years. she broke her hips a while ago. i think ABC will use this to raise up their Messiah and use this to his advantage. i am sorry his grandma got hurt, i just hope he does not use this for political motives only

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

I can’t believe some of you women call abortion rights “reproductive” rights. Despite your views on the issue… reproduction is one thing.. abortion is another… so don’t confuse the two issues like your some martyr for reproductive rights.

Posted by: Mark | October 22, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

concerned,
you absolutely have the right to reach the conclusion that Palin does not rise up to your threshold for VP. i apply a slightly different standard and reached the conclusion that she’s qualified. but neither of us has the right to alter facts and state that Palin hasn’t accomplished anything or take credit away from her accomplishments. stating that makes everything else you say very suspect, however well reasoned it might be. you lose all credibility by taking that argument.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Palin asks, “You’ve got to ask yourself why was Senator Hillary Clinton not even vetted by the Obama campaign?”
I ask, “How is it that Governor Palin was so poorly vetted by the McCain campaign?”

Posted by: http://inthecourse.blogspot.com | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Hillary would make a great Sec. of State.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Posted by: fob | Oct 22, 2008 10:08:31 AM
You just showed you don’t have a clue. Those stories are old. Don’t ya think that somebody somewhere would have connected the dots by now if there were anything to them? Even Fox hasn’t dug up anything….lol Come up with some new material.

Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

First of all, Sarah ‘ain’t’ no Hillary Clinton. Second: Barbara Walters asked Bill Clinton (when he was on The View) if Hillary wanted to be chosen as VP. Bill’s answer, emphatically, was “No, she did not!” In fact, recently Hillary stated that she would prefer to continue to be a Senator as she felt she could be more effective to help put the ‘Health Care’ in place.
McCain’s selection of VP running mate has back fired on the Republican campaign. If you recall, just after she was introduced at the convention, the polls indicated that the Republican Candidate’s popularity rose. But then, as the country got a more ‘up close and personal’ glimpse of who Sarah actually is, they recognized her lack of knowledge, and lack of preparedness, and the polls slid way down just as quickly as they had risen.
McCain’s campaign began to fall apart at that time. (The Katy Couric interviews.) So much so that Some Republican senators had publicly urged John to drop her from the ticket. His selection for VP tarnished the credibility of John McCain’s judgement. How could someone, who is a 72 years old candidate for President of the USA, who has had cancer 5 times, say that he always puts country first, choose a running mate who is not qualified to be President in his stead?
I do believe, when Republicans lose the election, one of the strong arguments that will be presented by many in the media, and by others, will be that John McCain’s selection of running mate was strongly to blame for his loss.
Or maybe the Republicans will blame Katy Couric when they are looking for scapegoats. They are so good at half-truths!

Posted by: Judy | October 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

SO, sounds like most of you will be on Obama train…..Do you really, really, think he gives a dam……
Corp America runs this country (just check the stocl market…)
You getting played and I love it. Finally (if he is elected)there will be no more talk of RACE in this country…..
It amazes me that American still seem to think someone is going to come along and save them….All I hear is (CHANGE)..Now ask youself, if the system made you million$$$$$$, would you change the system????
I DON’T THINK SO!!!!!!
Good luck boys and girls….

Posted by: JJ | October 22, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

gopalin – Drudge is a far right hack. I do not care what McCain personally pays women. It seems he doesn’t care what anybody else pays them. He didn’t even care to make the damn insurance companies cover birth control either, after they jumped on Viagra. The man is just not into giving a squat about women.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Palin on the side of women…what a joke. And for her to even mention Hillary makes me realize what a complete blunder McCain made by choosing this candidate. My vote stands…Obama will do more for women than this bubblehead ever would.

Posted by: pamp205 | October 22, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

While I would love to see a woman in our country’s highest office, my vote would never be be based on gender, race or anything other than who I think would make the better leader(s) of this country. To suggest that women should vote for the Palin ticket (she does overshadow McCain) because she is woman is silly. The thought of Palin as VP, let alone President, is frightening.

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Mark – here is the deal. When you suddenly grow a womb? Get back to me. If men had to give birth this right would be in the constitution. Then there’s the problem with 70 billion owed in back child support. Which men don’t seem to care about. So, I’m going with this is more about control.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Fob,
We’ll have to agree to disagree. But I’ll leave you with this; I have very thoughtfully and in all good faith truly considered the records, accomplishments and policies of all candidates. If you have done the same and come to a different conclusion, then I can respect that.
But to say that I lose credibility when gauging Palin’s experience based on what I percieve to be a less-than-honest representation on her part sounds very defensive of you.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

This is not about being a woman – she’s a joke – I almost can’t stand hearing her when she talks. I can’t begin to understand why ANYONE would actually think that she knows what she’s doing or that she’s even slightly qualified. I’m a woman, and would have gladly voted for Clinton – but because she knew what she was doing! not because she’s a woman.
Can you imagine Palin as VP… worse… President? Seriously? Please ladies, don’t McCain just because Palin is a woman – that’s just ignorant.

Posted by: vear | October 22, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

SAS,
I feel for you. You worked hard all your life, sacrificed when other’s we not willing to do so. Now that you are finally starting to make some money – Presto! the chosen one declares you are RICH and wants to take your money away and “spread it around” to those who were just watching Oprah while you were pounding books.
Oh Chosen One, the Messiah, and his minions, how do you explain to this lady that she’s being treated fairly?

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Ah,
So you all disagree with progressive taxation? Go back to 1913 and fix it.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Palin rubs some women the wrong way because she is pro-life……Plain and simple….If she were pro-choice the feminists would love her……She is a strong woman with family (not perfect, but is yours?) career and a true love for her country and understanding about what serving the people really means……Hillary stays with an abviously amoral man because it is politically expedient…..And she flip flops just like Obama instead of taking the heat from voters who disagree…..Palin has more class and principles than the two of them put together…..And I’ll tell you another thing, in spite of the voter fraud the Obama campaign supports, do not discount the partiotism of true Americans when they pull that curtain to vote………

Posted by: 3722535 | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Posted by: fob | Oct 22, 2008 10:08:31 AM
You just showed you don’t have a clue. Those stories are old. Don’t ya think that somebody somewhere would have connected the dots by now if there were anything to them? Even Fox hasn’t dug up anything….lol Come up with some new material.
________
Some people will never believe the truth if it slapped them in the face. I’m really tired of all the rumors and lies put out my the McCain campaign and that guy who started all the internet rumors about Obama. If all this was true do you not thing the RNC wouldn’t have the facts posted all over the place. The reason they can’t? They aren’t facts, just made up rumors.

Posted by: jen | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Why didn’t Palin publicly endorse Clinton during the primaries? It seems pretty obvious that all this “support” for Clinton, now that she is not running, is a lot of BS. Will Palin endorse Clinton when she runs for re-election in the Senate?

Posted by: Chris | October 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

At this point in the game Sarah Palin criticizing anything is like Satan sitting outside the prison yard fence telling the inmates how morally screwed up they must be. It is transparent that she is good at what she does but doesn’t come with the necessary game at this point to play at this level of politics. I don’t know if Mcain made this choice on his own or if the party somehow twisted his arm into it, but I bet secretly right now, he’s feeling a bit like Tom Cruises’ character in the movie Rain Man having to deal with his politically challenged but otherwise brilliant sibling.

Posted by: Bmr | October 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Geeeeeeeeeeeeez. Send her back to her igloo with her nice new wardrobe.

Posted by: BL | October 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

gopalin–I am sure she could name cases after she had a chance to be briefed. Yesterday, she explained the VP in such a ridiculous way that the third grader who asked the question probably said, “Huh?”
Mark–I did not mean abortion rights, I meant reproductive rights. Since you do not have a vagina, and presumably cannot give birth, I am sure that I have more of a stake in this issue. Roe v. Wade is only one issue. Painting anyone who believes that reproductive rights are important as “pro-abortion” is ludicrous. I do not support abstinence only education, I do not believe that pharmacists should be allowed to refuse birth control based on their personal beliefs, and I do not believe that Sarah Palin will do anything to prevent unwanted pregnancies in this country.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

“Our opponents think that they have the women’s vote all locked up which is a little presumptuous since only our side has a woman on the ticket,” Palin said to strong applause.
Just because you have a uterus does not mean you speak for all women. How presumptuous of you!

Posted by: amanda | October 22, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

ahhh… invoking “patriotism” in voting for a white man. That’s as bad as invoking patriotism as a reason to support war. WOW.

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

“Palin brings in thousands and thousands of people at her rallies, so ABC are you going to report that…”
Wow! Is Palin then “the world’s greatest celebrity”? I thought Johnny had awarded that to Obama.————–
actually she is.. she brought in the highest SNL showing since 14 years. the VP debate was the highest of all time ever. she had 22 thous at her rally in colorado. in VA she had up to 30 thousand.. several times they ahd to move to a larger location for Palin because so many people wnat to see her.. they are curious about her, excited about her and she has energize this election. you gotta ask why people are tearing her down, they feel threaten by her.
i would have you demand that ABC actually start showing the numbers of people at her rallies… i would have you demand that ABC vet Obama and investigate into his assoicates in Chicago, all of his associates are either under federal investigation or on their way.. do not rely jyust on ABC to tell you their stories, investigate for yourself

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

What newspaper ever investigated the cost of the wardrobe for Obama, McCain or Biden or any other male candidate? Am I the only one who senses a bias against a female candidate here?

Posted by: joe | October 22, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Has this discussion really come down to who’s pulling more numbers at rallies?
Oh the agony…
Issues people!!!

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

We are seeing the start of the fouth Reich. Media lies, Media Smears, Voter Fraud, Blind followers, Brain washed youngsters, school teachers advocating political views to children and the possibility of a Democrat President, A Democrat House and a Democrat Senate. This alone scares me to death that every citizen of the United States have given their own Rights and Freedom to a political group that can tell you when to sh_t, how often and what color it should be. I for one condemn this kind of government, as would ever American soldier that gave his life to preserve our well being, and freedom. Those of you that are looking forward to this democratic run government need to ask the old timers from WW II in Germany what they think of this type of Government.

Posted by: Johns Side Kick | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

She brought in the highest SNL ratings because of Tina Fey’s hilarious AND SPOT ON impersonations of her! Palin is the laughing stock, don’t you get it???

Posted by: cal | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Concerned,
I’m sorry but you are being evasive and vague. I didn’t say you lose all credibility by weighing all the issues – quite the opposite. I said you lose all credibility if you don’t weigh all the issues and blindly state that Sarah Palin hasn’t accomplished anything or try to take credit away for what she’s accomplished. You still can’t bring yourself to give credit for some things she’s accomplished. That’s what shoots your credibility with people like me. That said, I respect your right to choose based on whatever criteria you think is important to you.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

372…: “Palin rubs some women the wrong way because she is pro-life……Plain and simple….”
I’m sure that’s part of it. Another part is she rarely seems to understand what she’s talking about.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

For women? The “oxyMoron” believes ALL birth control is “abortion.” Which supports about what Bush is trying to do right now. As they scream about entitlement they seem to promote the most stupid garbage that would only increase entitlement.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Actually, side-kick, soldiers like Obama. Earlier this month the veterans group “Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America” released a “scorecard” giving letter grades to members of congress based on their voting record for veterans issues. Senator John McCain received a D, while Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Joe Biden both received a B.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Paul I so agree. Do tell, are many men just voting for this woman because she’s hot or something here? I just do not get this one. Her head is on disconnect.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

I totally agree with you “gopalin”…
BLOWS the MIND>>>>>
Again, the big picture states the truth, the amazing minds in this country are busy making billions, not running for office….What we are being entertained with, is simply the left overs…..
Down hill here we come!!!!!

Posted by: jj | October 22, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

to Heather, so if Palin explained in language not understood by a 3rd grader, the MSM would be after her.. if you are thinking of Biden’s take on the VP job from the VP debate, you have been misinformed, Biden was wrong on that too.
Biden was taken off the trail recently because he made a another dumb Gaffe, CNN just confirmed to Palin that they would had crucified her of she made that kind of statement that Biden made.
your man is not a messiah. Biden is a joke. the world is so excited to have Obama win becayuse then they can do anyting they want to us (and we will be wishing that we had not elected the messiah) the world knows that Obama is weak, inexprienced and that Biden is an idiot.

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I have decided to vote EARLY for McCain/Palin.
I am one of those bitter Hillary supporters who feel that she was cheated out of the nomination.
Too bad Obama did not choose her as the VP.
I am a lifelong Democrat who will be voting straight Republican for the first time, since we need a balance in Washington.

Posted by: Bitter Hillary supporter | October 22, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Bitter – Bunk. I’m a Hillary voter too. You’re a die hard republican.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Jwench,
Yes, these are old stories and have stood the test of time… that’s why I call them the Obama all-star line up. Rookies don’t get to become all-stars.
So what’s your pick, here’s how I’d line them up.
Wright as Center.
Phleger and Rezko as forwards.
Ayers and Farakhan as point guards
Do you think it is better to play Farakhan at center as he lords over all of them?

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Susan-1: Are you that dense? If your guy is so pro-choice than how come on a number of pro-choice legislations has he not voted in favor but just “present”? BTW, Just b/c someone isn’t pro-choice DOES NOT mean they don’t support women- what an obtuse way to look at things. McCain does in fact put his money where his mouth is and frankly I’m getting the feeling that some women are just threatened by how much Palin has accomplished while raising 5 children. I’m not going ot villianize her just because she has religious beliefs. That’s pretty stupid. She’s done quite a lot in her career so get over it already!!! It’s other jealous women that cause many of the problems with our gender getting ahead. I’m tired of it.

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Nice try Sarah. This woman and long time Hillary supporter is still voting Obama/Biden 2008!

Posted by: Carolina | October 22, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

I was HOPING she’d come out and attack on this. THIS is the new direction of feminism – not the whiny, ultra-liberal victimhood of the past. I am a woman who always voted Democratic, am 40, and think the two real problems that women face in this country are precisely those that smacked my candidate, HRC, down: sexism, and lack of access to REAL power.
With one move, John McCain is looking to change all that, and I love the way the Republicans are suddenly progressive in decrying sexism against Sarah Palin. Not because she can’t decry it herself, but because it is just flat out wrong to hold gender against women these days.
As the Dems did to HRC.
I am squarely behind McCain Palin now. She hit the Dems right where it hurts – in their shameful treatment of women. I am glad she had the guts to stick a knife into that oozing wound and turn it, ripping off the pathetic band-aid Obama / Pelosi / Dean / Brazille slapped on it with the ‘all ride the unity pony’ meme.
About bloody time! Go Sarah!

Posted by: sharonevolving | October 22, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Fob,
Just one more time. She does not deserve credit for standing up to big oil, halting the bridge to nowhere or building a gas pipeline for the reasons I have noted. And I pick those examples because THOSE are the reasons she says she’s qualified to be VP. Because she hasn’t done those things the way she likes to say she has, I find her lacking and unthruthful.
Here’s what I will give her every credit for: raising a family, being a working mother, standing up for her beliefs (even if I disagree), her duties as mayor (every one says great things about what she did then).
But the stuff she’s bragging about is false. So I cannot give her credit.
See the difference?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

gopalin – Drudge is a far right hack. I do not care what McCain personally pays women. It seems he doesn’t care what anybody else pays them. He didn’t even care to make the damn insurance companies cover birth control either, after they jumped on Viagra. The man is just not into giving a squat about women.
are you sure he is a righty??? i have checked his site daily and he has alot of pro Obama comments on there.. sometimes it is pretty fair and balanced…

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Dayana: “And to Paul, YES it has actually happened before that a female presidential candidate in the primaries was not picked as running-mate by the nominee.”
You’re being selective with Palin’s words. She made the point that Clinton got so much support – even cited the 18 million number – and yet wasn’t selected, and asked how many times have we seen that before.
The simple, factual answer is never.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

As an African American and one who know of the struggles of Marcus Garvey and HIM Selassie 1-
Obama is a Hollywood gimmick

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

She brought in the highest SNL ratings because of Tina Fey’s hilarious AND SPOT ON impersonations of her! Palin is the laughing stock, don’t you get it???
Cal-
Tina fey started playng Palin in sept… no high ratings at that time. Palin goes in on one night and they pulled in the highest in that night only. so really sounds like you are just like ABC, lie and believe your lie.

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Bitter – wonder what Hillary would have to say to you about that? And how do you think you will have a balance in Washington by voting for McCain/Palin?

Posted by: Jen | October 22, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

You have just got to love the next vice-president of America Sarah Palin.
She kicks ass and speaks the truth….
Poor baby Obama still crying, still playing the race card, and now playing she dresses better than I do..
Poor baby Obama will have to go back to Chicago and try to make some real money to pay for his mansion because he will never ever be president.
Poor baby Obama will be exposed as a fraud and a socialist who hangs around with terrorists and anti-American proliferations.
Poor baby Obama will not win the presidency… not because he is black/white… but because he has no substance, no experience and no sense of America the beautiful, only America the mean….

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Concerned,
Great Obama bumper sticker “No credit for standing up to Oil Companies”.. fantastic, that explains why Obama voted to “credit” oil companies with billions of dollars.
An incredible argument such as this in no way enhances your credibility.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

For CONCERNED: your scores are probably correct but you eluded to tell why. McCain voted against a Bill to support our army in Iraq because the DEMOCRATS had added a pull out date that would have waved the White Flag of Surrender.
Your right OBAMA did vote for the bill to pull out of Iraq and except the consqences of defeat and another place for Al Quada and the Taliban to to thrive in. I’ll take his D for that anytime and by the way, your reasoning is part of the lies and half truth’s being spread to creat a new fouth Reich to destroy a freedom that men and women have died for since they landed in America to rid themselves of the opressions of the British Crown which happened to be the uncontrolled taxation that we are about to experience.

Posted by: Earls Side Kick | October 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Fob,
Source, please?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Actually I’m seeing now that Obama made a great choice in not picking Clinton.
Why? Because it suckered McCain into picking Palin.
Polling is now indicating that Palin is a bigger drag on McCain than is Bush.

Posted by: Paul | October 22, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

sarah, sarah…
should we, as good Americans, condemn john mccain because he didn’t select a better candidate…romney or pawlenty…to help him win the presidency?
it would be a different race had he chosen a better running mate…yeah you betcha!!!
enjoy the trip back to alaska and the inquiry as to why you spent the taxpayers funds flying your children around to watch bubba race in the snow!!!

Posted by: hemnebob | October 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I love my wife;
“What woman in her right mind would vote to push another woman past the ‘glass ceiling’, just so that she could reinforce it from the other side?” – Mrs. Atomweaver
Smart woman…

Posted by: atomweaver | October 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

i wonder if ABC will follow up on the letter that McCain and 19 other senators wrote to try to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie.. Obama name was not on that letter. i saw the actuall letter on Drudge and WSJ last week. Obama voted Present, when he told the world that he tried to control it, he lied and the reason he lied was because her recieved the 2nd h ighest money from Fannie Mae.

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

If experience is important I would rather have a vice president than a president that needs on the job training. That is what I will base my vote on and I hope that whoever is elected will make putting the US back as a country that others want to come and live in. Not a place to draw a government check because you decided to drop out of school and have babies.

Posted by: Ron | October 22, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

“The discrepancy, however, appears be that more top level staffers in Obama’s Senate office are men, and therefore have higher pay.”
Exactly! This is the exact reason that is ALWAYS given when wages appear to be unequal. So tell us, Sen. Obama, couldn’t you find any qualified women for the top posts?
You’ve got to watch what he DOES and not be swayed by what he SAYS.

Posted by: Dee | October 22, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

I don’t see how Palin can suddenly try to court women’s votes when McCain is marketing Palin as an anti-feminist. McCain said on Sunday, “As a cold political calculation, I could not be more pleased… She is a direct counterpoint to the liberal feminist agenda in America.” Only someone who had the deepest contempt for women would have chosen a female running mate not for her experience, not for her intellect, but merely as a “cold political calculation.”

Posted by: Sandy | October 22, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

sharonevolving – Hummm, let’s see. Making women pay for their own rape kits, yeah that’s progressive. Being a hypocrite about morals – she was preggo’s when she married Todd. Had contractors for the stadium being built in Alaska build her a $500,000 house. Had an affair. etc… the list goes on and on. Progressive – I think not! Same old repub crap – doesn’t matter her gender. I will vote for the most qualified and the ones I think will make a difference. Not someone just because she is a woman!

Posted by: jen | October 22, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Side kick,
The sky is not falling, I promise. The scare tactics aren’t working so just relax.
But it’s time to rethink the war strategy. It’s simply not working. Obama and many others (including repubs) have known this for a long time. And we continue to pay the ultimate price with the lives of our young and dedicated soldiers. It’s no longer acceptable.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

gp – Just what all was attached to the bill. Remember these bills always have attachments.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

oh my gawd…
terry do…
are you kidding?
let’s see…putin flies over alaska making palin experienced in foreign affairs.
so when the jets fly over the midwest that makes me an experienced traffic controller. or maybe a jet mechanic?
yea…
like your imbalanced reasoning there cowgirl…
republicans voting for mccain…
values include…
loyalty over honesty
blind faith over reason
platitudes over examination
(thankyou khote14)
yeah, you’re a real good American.
i value what is good for my great country not my party…
‘nuf said…
you my dear…are the weakest link

Posted by: hemnebob | October 22, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Palin slams Obama for passing over Clinton? What about McCain passing over Romney for Palin? That’s the real tragedy and the reason why McCain will lose this election.

Posted by: Drew Hoffman | October 22, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

I AM one of those females that came before Palin, have worked for 44 years, raised a child alone without financial support and succeeded in the workplace. All of this was accomplished without a college education, sleeping my way up or manipulating others. It has not been an easy road but I helped pave it for the women behind me including my daughter; I helped pave it to remove the limitations I was faced with …. the life of June Cleaver. No thank you.
However, I did not pave this road to be wholly insulted by the nomination of this woman to high political office. She does not represent women like me. I must respect the intellect and experience put before me no matter what gender, what color, what religion. Without intelligence (education is not the same as intelligence!), experience and respect I will not support anyone.
As a result I do not, can not and never will support the likes of a Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Kathy | October 22, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Taqlking about hijacking African Americans Dream thats Obama and his Hollywood friends

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

i remember when Bill Clinton was running for prez, manyyyyyy women were picking him because they thought he was sooo handsome and that was one of the big reason why he won as pres. he flip floped on alot of issues.. in the beginnig he said he would cut taxes, then when elected he said, nope cant do, and raised them… he said he would support gays.. then he comes up with a dumb “don;t ask don’t tell”. he said one thing and did the opposite and that is what our Messiah is doing to us right now.. Calif permits gay marriage (Rep govenor). Mass permits gay marriage (rep govenor) if the dems are soo in favor of gay marriages, why havent all the democrat governors approved this in their state..just proves that this is not their priority.. their priority is to tax us more. Barney Frank (d) who is a liar and incompent to oversee our money just announced yesterday that we need to be taxed more… Hawaii had to end their hugely popular universal healthcare after 7 months of launching it because they ran out of money. partily because people were dropping their insurance to get the free insurance.. this is the same agenda that Obama is pushing on us.. it will cost us a lot of money, nothing is free

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Does anyone believe polls from the Obama only for president,Mainstream Media?
Any polls from ABC, CNN MSNBC etc. are all skewed in Obama’s favor, by at least 5 points, so say all you want the truth will be shown on November 5th.
Obama will go back to Chicago
Acorn will be dissolved
And Pelosi, Reed, Brazile et al will be charged with corruption and fraud in the DNC convention and the RBC voting irregularities…
No one believes these polls, no one believes Obama and the only true Democratic leader was Hillary Rodham Clinton and the DNC ruined their own party….

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Sandy, haven’t you noticed that there are some real differences from the “liberal” feminist agenda and the rest of us women who are out here working hard and getting ahead on our own merits? I’m very proud of Sarah Palin and what she represents. She proves that don’t have to subjugate yourself to irrelevant fringe groups like NOW to be a strong and successful woman.

Posted by: Dee | October 22, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

And under clinton the budget was balanced, taxes were lower, and this country saw a dramatic increase in small business, jobs and millionares.
Hm…

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

As smart as Hillary is, maybe the USA doesn’t want four more years of listening to Bill Clinton’s cavorts during the evening news every night. It was disgusting, demoralizing, and not something the children need to be hearing about.

Posted by: Becky Hodge | October 22, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Obama is still an illegitimate candidate for the historic title First Black American President- Those are shoes he will and can never fill wit his partial ideologies as he has kissed the filth of Hollywood and tricked many blacks into voting for him in the primaries suddenly he is on a Middle Class ticket- what- what happen to the black males in the jailhouses etc.

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Make no mistake, Sarah’s appeal is not strongest amongst woman. She panders to the extreme-right-evangelical base. She’s not winning significant independents.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

gp – Just what all was attached to the bill. Remember these bills always have attachments.
to jenny-
point is, where is Obamas?? he makes many ” i proposed this” ” I suggested this” ” this was alllll my idea”, yet he votes present.. he only votes if it benefits him.

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

terrydo…
if everything here is skewed…(your words)
then why are you here?

Posted by: hemnebob | October 22, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

HI JEN. Can you post where you got all of this information from about Palin, Was it from Rev Wright? maybe Bill Ayers? Tony Rezko? or some bloggers web site. I guess you didn’t read about her banning books or having affairs around Alaska, I wonder to, if she didn’t convince the Oil cartel in Alaska to build Senator Stevens house for 250,000 too. you also forgot about her daughter having the autistic child. Wow your really missing the boat with all the extra info Ive seen out there in space.

Posted by: Johns side Kick | October 22, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

gopalin,
You can find all of Obama’s sponsored and co-sponsored bills on the Congress website or the Illinois state website. There’s about 1400 off them.
You can also go to his site and read up on the ‘issues’ and see how his voting record supports what he wants to do.
I suggest you check it out. Maybe it will change your mind, or maybe you will feel even more supportive of McCain. Either way, you’ll be able to make a more informed decision.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I am outraged at the way Obama treated Hillary durring the primary. He and the media are horrible.
I vowed to never vote for Obama even though I am a lifelong democrat.
I will be voting for McCain and Palin this November.
The media has been disgusting with how they smear Sarah Palin and have given Joe Biden a free pass with what he says.
Funny how my fellow democrats said I would “cool off” and “come to my senses and vote Obama”.
I said I will never support him and that means that I never ever support him.
If there is one thing I have learned to do recently is to denounce a president as not being my president. Obama will never be my president. Not ever!

Posted by: Krissy K | October 22, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Palin’s not a woman… she’s a red-neck.
They have no gender… just ignorant bumbling blather.

Posted by: PulSamsara | October 22, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

At a rally in front of thousands of cheering supporters, Palin spent most of her speech talking about women. She started by mentioned some female endorsements: First, Prameela Bartholomeusz a small business owner and a member of the Democratic National Platform Committee…Linda Klinge the former Oregon president and now Vice-President of the National Organization of Women…Shelly Mandell President of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization of Women here with us today and Lynn Rothschild you may have seen her on television a whole lot lately. She is a member of the Democratic Platform Committee. She is with us here today and Elaine Lafferty a former editor in chief of Ms. magazine they are here today to endorse the McCain-Palin campaign.”
The women were all sat behind Palin on the stage and she then said that the Democratic ticket “presumptuous” thinking that they have won the women’s vote.

Posted by: Kirsten Powers | October 22, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

And under clinton the budget was balanced, taxes were lower, and this country saw a dramatic increase in small business, jobs and millionares.
Hm…
said by Concerned….
are you sure?? can you show me that fact, and i just don’t want to take your word for it. remember more government=more money=more taxes=Democrats.. how are we all going to pay for universal healthcare?? look at Canada, they have been followibng socialism for sooooo long and just recently they said it is no longer working and the conservatives won.. we are following Canadas footpath and they have high taxes and high prices….

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I just can’t believe that the McCain campaign does not proofread and fact check the comments that come out of Palin’s mouth. I can see the head of the campaign putting his head in his hands everytime Palin makes a gaffe. I wish we could see backstage footage…LOL. McCain is probably about to have a little accident in his pants everytime she speaks because he has to come after her and clean up the messes that she makes.
At this point if they told Palin to just sit and look pretty I would not be surprised. Just a few more days and this will be over.
Obama/Biden ’08/’12

Posted by: DeeAustin | October 22, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

esm – Obviously I’m not “that dense” because I’m well aware of the fact that “present” votes aren’t allowed in the US Senate and that’s in IL where it’s a common “nay” vote in protest. I also noticed McCain saying “the health of the mother is an extreme argument when it comes to abortion.” WRONG ANSWER. I happen to believe in God. I also happen to think she is welcome to her beliefs. I disagree with thinking they need to help make policy. Unlike you I don’t go pro “va jay jay” just for the sake of it. What a slap to Hillary.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Jenny Rome Ga | Oct 22, 2008 10:44:23 AM
Wow! Jenny, you question Governor Sarah Palin’s experience.
She has been Mayor, and now Governor of Alaska.
Obama has been community leader…Please!
People are supporting him out of white guilt or out of black pride and for no other good reason.
Hillary was far superior than Obama on so many level it would take a book to list her credits.
Even Sarah Palin has more experience and savoir faire,to be president than Obama has.
Where is Barry Soetoro’s real Birth Certificate? He may not have even been born in America and thus not even eligible to be president?
Why does he hide so much of his past, he is an total unknown?
If Obama were applying to a large corporation for CEO with his resume, he would not even be consider for entry level position…
And he wants to be president of America?

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Bitter Hillary supporter- Yeah, who cares whats better for the country.
B.T.W. You was never a Democrat, because they make rational decisions.

Posted by: Redneck4Obama | October 22, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

I would have voted for Hillary Clinton if she were on the top of the ticket just like I plan on voting for Barack Obama who is on the top of the ticket. But we must take a step back and say what would have happened if we had Hillary Clinton, a woman and Barack Obama, a black man on the ticket? The answer is simple no chance in hell of winning. Change is good, as long as it is gradual. American is not ready, as sad as it is to say, for a black man president and a woman vice president. I’m a black female so I’m aware of both the racism and sexism that taint our world. How dare Palin act as though it doesn’t exist. After all she was only picked because she is a woman!

Posted by: KB | October 22, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Of course Obama wasn’t going to pick Hillary for his running mate. He wanted a puppet with a pulse who would just go along with his leftist illuminati viewpoints. That’s why he picked the man who has done absolutely nothing in his political career – Joe Biden.

Posted by: Jeff | October 22, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

TerryDo,
It’s comments like that where I can’t believe that ignorant and bigot people still exist in the US.
It has nothing to do with Black Pride or race for that matter. As I saw on another blog the other day if that were the case the huge number of African Americans that voted for Bill Clinton both times would not have voted because he was white. Now does that make sense?
Give me a break!

Posted by: DeeAustin | October 22, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Palin has not managed to garner the womens vote as much as many people thought she would. If she was worried about gaining women voters, she would have spent more talking about womens issues and less time talking about Ayers, terrorist, etc. Why wait until now and decide that womens issues matter? Maybe because of instead of the race tightening, Obama is actually gaining leads.

Posted by: Francheska | October 22, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Kristen-
Colin Powel endorses McCain. one of MLK jr niece endorses McCain. 4 retired secretary of state endores McCain. umm the MSM is silent on this.
they are silent on every endorsement that the McCain receives…
for Concerned: beleive me i am researching both sides. i come from a family that is either voting for Obama or voting for McCain. the thing is i have found soo many new evidence that are coming to light about Obama that the press is hushing about or stating “no one is interested in that!!”. what is really making me lean toward McCain is the MSM and they continue to glorify the messiah. i mean doesn’t that kind of freak you out? they ahve labeled Obama the Messiah

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

The point Palin is making folks, is that women should not have to choose between “supporting a woman” or voting their policy positions once every 24 years.
This country has become so polarized that you can’t even accept the truth of what she is saying. There should be way more choices by now than just Hillary and Palin and they have BOTH faced a sort of sanctioned misogyny from their opponents on the left and right. There are some real issues going on here. Can you not take off the partisan blinders for two seconds and say “well, she’s right about that part, but I still will vote for Obama”?
You really think Palin has not had to fight what other women have fought because she holds different views politically? You think some sexist boss stops because a woman tells him she is Pro Life?

Posted by: Vern | October 22, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

0bama didn’t pick Clinton as VP because:
- She got more votes than him
- He had to threaten her delegates to vote for him at the convention
- He had to cheat in the caucuses – ACORN anyone?
- He had to cheat at the RBC – and cheat Michigan and FL out of half their votes
- He had run the most anti-woman, misogynistic campaign in history (and he flipped off Hillary at rallies in NC, to the laughter and hoots of his rabid pubescent fans)
- He had to buy off the media to whitewash his cheating and his lying and his dark, dark history
- Ever notice how 2 of Hillary’s most ardent supporters/delegates mysteriously DIED right before the convention? If you believe what the 0bamamedia is telling you – about any of this – then you are stupid.
So, why wouldn’t 0bama pick Hillary for his VP? Because the top of the ticket is rightfully hers – AND HE HATES HER FOR IT. There is some heavy strong-arming going on to keep her from revealing all.
0bots will call this tin-foil-hat stuff – because they’re instrumental in perpetrating all these crimes – of course the accuser is “crazy.”

Posted by: Summer | October 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

gopalin,
The GOP has labled him that. It’s meant to scare you. Don’t vote based on that. Just keep learning about actual issues.
Please also check the second link I provided…you might be suprised.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

For Sarah Palin to come off as having a stronghold on women’s issues is almost as laughable as it is sad.
Taking this woman seriously is a daunting task!!!

Posted by: Jennifer | October 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

: gopalin | Oct 22, 2008 10:51:02 AM
terrydo…
if everything here is skewed…(your words)
then why are you here?
*************************
I said all the polls are skewed and that comment was for people like yourself who believe these polls and think Obama will win… He will lose!
And I am here because I was originally a Hillary R. Clinton supporter and will vote McCain/Palin 2008 as a protest vote against the DNC et.al.

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Susan-1: I’m tired of entertaining your comments…sorry I don’t use the term “va jay jay” and it is unbecoming for you to assume that I support women for the sake of supporting women. It’s offensive to the rest of the people on this post. At the end of the day you can’t deny that Obama pays women less than men- says one thing and does another AS USUAL. BTW, I would prefer Hillary over Obama any day!!!
LET’S GO MCCAIN/PALIN ’08- don’t let glitz and glam fool you- remember: talk is cheap.

Posted by: ESM | October 22, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Concerned,
You need the source to prove that Obama voted to give oil companies billions of dollars.. the cheney energy bill.

Posted by: fob | October 22, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

gopalin – Drudge has been playing it in favor of McCain from the start here. He’s supposedly a “librertarian.” I figured this out the day he “made up” a rumor that Oprah “refused” to have Palin on her show. There was no truth to that rumor, and it was merely to mess with things. And it worked.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Jen’s not been doing her homework. Naughty girl, being in the service of men without knowing how you take your own gender down. Spend 5 minutes on factcheck.org. Everything the media’s smeared Palin with…is debunked.
Try again, sweetie, when you come back with some researched and logical arguments, instead of Obama’s website talking points.

Posted by: sharonevolving | October 22, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“If Obama were applying to a large corporation for CEO with his resume, he would not even be consider for entry level position…”
You are absolutely right – and as Carly Fiorina said, neither would any of the other candidates in the running.
To be the CEO of a large company you need to be ruthless, care only about profits (and your own perks), and have to answer only to the board. To be a President, you need to make sure not only that you are doing the right thing for the country, but also be able to listen to, convince and motivate the majority of the population. A country, unfortunately, is not a corporation, neither is it an army. Give me a community organizer, a powerful speaker and someone with advisors like Warren Buffett, Colin Powell and Wesley Clarke, any day.

Posted by: Company CEO | October 22, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Jen, thats how rumors get started. We know more about Gov. Sarah Palin and family, then Sen. Obama and his family, which is OFF limits.

Posted by: Lizzie | October 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Factcheck also debunks ayers and acorn…

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

@Dee;
“She proves that don’t have to subjugate yourself to irrelevant fringe groups like NOW to be a strong and successful woman. ”
Actually I think that all Palin proves, is that there are fringe groups _other_ than NOW, that a woman politician can subjugate herself to for success.
;-)

Posted by: atomweaver | October 22, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Gopalin: “i have a co worker who is black and he is voting forObama because he is black, that is his only reason… when it is a women, you become haters and you set successful women back to the beginning when we were worthless and beneath men, you are now valiadating those times… all women who are successful all have different opnions and different approaches,m who cares if she has a different value as yours, you should be behind a successful woman!!”
Are you serious?! In one breath you’re ripping on your co-worker for voting for Obama “just because he’s black” and in the next you’re damning us because we’re not voting for Palin just because she’s a woman?!
Honestly!

Posted by: Cait | October 22, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

So Bill Ayers is an Anarchist/Marxist and Obama has Socialist/Marxit tendicies. At least they had something in common to discuss during their many boring board meetings together.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

gopalin,
“Colin Powel endorses McCain..” What did he change his mind since yesterday ? I thought even Rush Limbaugh heard that Powell had endorsed Obama.

Posted by: Colin Powell | October 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Dee, in my earlier comment I was referring to McCain’s selection of Palin as a “cold political calculation” (his words). McCain seems to think that women will simply vote for someone with two X chromosomes, regardless of whether they have the experience or the intelligence to lead this country. It’s insulting. Palin is no Hillary. When Palin talks she sounds like a trained parrot, repeating stump phrases in unintelligible run-on sentences that often have no relation to the questions asked or the issues at stake. Supporting women’s rights does not mean blindly electing a uterus for office: it is about providing role-models we want our daughters to look up to.

Posted by: Sandy | October 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

“Factcheck also debunks ayers and acorn…”
Fakecheck is a joke that has been proven to be biased.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Dear Me – I didn’t say I was voting for Obama did I? Isn’t it interesting how we see, hear and read what we want to see, hear and read.

Posted by: Kathy | October 22, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Concerned | Oct 22, 2008 11:03:24 AM
TerryDo,
It’s comments like that where I can’t believe that ignorant and bigot people still exist in the US.
It has nothing to do with Black Pride or race for that matter. As I saw on another blog the other day if that were the case the huge number of African Americans that voted for Bill Clinton both times would not have voted because he was white. Now does that make sense?
Give me a break!
******************
When over 94% of African Americans voted for Obama during the primary, if that does not show racism I do not know what does.
And then for Obama’s campaign accuse President Bill Clinton of being a racist, that is what is unbelievable in this country. A president that was so supportive and proactive in AA rights and advancements.
Don’t get on your high horse, there is racism in all races.
This is not just a white black issue or black yellow issue etc, racism is with us and will always be.
Just ask Rev. J Wright who the racist are in his church when they talk about hatred towards white people. What would you call that?

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

By the same token, I would like to attack Senator McCain for not choosing an African American candidate as his running mate. It is a symbol of his inherent racism and the larger problem of racism that is prevalent in so many parts of this country.

Posted by: ray | October 22, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Mack,
You clearly haven’t read the site. They are non-partisan and provide copious sourcing for their information.
Ayers and Acorn have been debunked.
Period.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

ESM – Well, you’ve managed to yet again convince me that only harsh women love the harsh woman. (This is code) I guess we are attracted to those most like us. The “all that” attitude. Let’s go over this again. I do not care what McCain pays his women. What I care about is his past legislative record and on this subject he’s the pits. But hey, he did offer up Cindy’s “mammary glands” (is the official word approved by you?) a while back saying they would win a contest. You recall? When ministers got on him over that one? Between that and the “c” word? Um, sorry – Obama’s more into treating women with respect. Unlike you if I’m going to make history with the first woman? I care about quality. I’d like it to reflect well on our sex. Why would I support the “anti” woman woman?

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

For all of you mocking Obama’s experience, here’s a little fact (not that it would matter to you). One other president had exactly 8 years in the Illinois state senate and 2 years in the US senate.
His name was Abraham Lincoln.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

I am not voting for Obama because the superdelagates picked him and I never did feel like my vote counted as for Palin she is just Mccain’s second and at least she got there the honest way so I guess I will just have to vote for the one I think is honest and that would be McCain

Posted by: Bishop | October 22, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

There are thousands of links about Bill Clinton and his failure to kill Osama bin Laden. Clinton is responsible for the Global War on Terror.
http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?/en/story-details/the_9_11_warnings_bill_clinton_missed_and_opportunities_to_kill_bin_laden/
Bush inherited a Clinton Recession and corporate scandals hatched on The Clinton’s watch. Source CNN.
http://money.cnn.com/2002/08/07/news/economy/bush_cheney/
Clinton is the Daddy of the Sub-Prime mess.
http://piggington.com/thank_you_clinton_for_the_subprime_boom_1999_nyt_article

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

“Palin’s not a woman… she’s a red-neck.
They have no gender… just ignorant bumbling blather.”
Posted by: PulSamsara——————-
Hey, don’t insult us Rednecks like that!
She has more of a white trash klan’s member mentality!
This you might like. http://www.rednecks4obama.com/page3.php

Posted by: Redneck4Obama | October 22, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

I am embarrassed for Palin. Her comments are hypocritical and idiotic. She touts herself as an advocate for women yet she is on the ticket that opposes equal pay for women. She brings up Geraldine Ferraro who the Dems nominated for VP. It took the Republicans 24 years to name a woman to their ticket.
But, the most frightening thing is Sarah Palin is unqualified for the job of presidency yet she is a heartbeat away from the presidency.
http://www.examiner.com/x-1172-Birmingham-Political-Examiner~y2008m10d18-John-McCains-choice-of-Sarah-Palin-for-VP-may-have-cost-him-the-presidency

Posted by: Rach | October 22, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

gopalin,
With all respect, those sources are incredebly biased and without reliable sourcing. I applaud your efforts to learn all sides of the story, but you’re listening to unreliable sources…

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

To Bishop: What are you talking about? Obama got his party nomination from voters, and only from superdelegates after he had secured the nomination. Even back in May, Obama was getting as many as 75,000 people at his rallies. His record-breaking $600 million fundraising campaign has been from middle-class donors contributing an average of just $80. Obama is finally a candidate enthusiastically supported by everyday people, not just by corporations or moneyed special interest groups. He is an example of mass democracy at its best.

Posted by: Sam | October 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

gopalin–Ghost Wars chronicles the cause of the War on Terror. It started well before Clinton. Read much?
Did Clinton ignore the intelligence reports that a plane would fly into the WTC? Hmmm… I think that was a guy named Bush.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

“How many times do you have to get hit over the head before you figure out who’s hitting you?”
- Harry S. Truman (talking to farmers about why they shouldn’t vote Republican anymore) sent to us by Jonny in California

Posted by: Redneck4Obama | October 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

gopalin – Soon you will begin hearing about the issues within the SEC under Cox, appointed by Bush. The began to not enforce, they cut fines to a third. In 2003 Paulsen (yes, current TS) was one of five big bankers in a meeting urging for relaxed rules on risk, which lead to all of this as well. (And yet here he sits in charge of this bailout??) Some VERY “reckless” things went on yet again inside an agency originally set up to protect us, that the Bush administration managed to turn into another arm of them. Same with the EPA and FDA. Actually McCain nailed it by suggesting we “fire” Cox. I wonder how we do get rid of these people.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

And Gopalin,
the cnn article you site is more of a jab at bush and cheney than anything…

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

gopalin,
“Colin Powel endorses McCain..” What did he change his mind since yesterday ? I thought even Rush Limbaugh heard that Powell had endorsed Obama.
————
no Colin Powell’s son is endorsing McCain..I made a typo error…
also Fact Check. org is funded by the annenberg which was once runned by Ayers and Obama.. so yes they are not correct anymore

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

“When it came time for choosing, somehow Barack Obama just couldn’t bring himself to pick the woman who got 18 million votes in his primary, and that seems to be too familiar a story isn’t it?” Palin said at a rally in Henderson, NV yesterday. “How it is for so many American women that the qualifications are there, but for some reason the promotion never comes?
Where do I even begin? Obama didn’t choose Hillary because: (a) she didn’t want to be VP she wanted to be P, and (b) she wouldn’t have been an appropriate complement for his skill set. Biden was an excellent choice. Unlike McCain who picks random wing nuts without qualification to run with him, Obama chose someone who could complement him in the White House. Although VP takes over when P dies, it doesn’t mean that VP = P. The truth is, Hillary was an amazing candidate, but 4 years too damn late. Where the hell was she in ’04 when I was ready to support her?
Obama is a better candidate overall than Hillary. That is why I vote Obama in ’08. That said: Palin is NO Hillary. Hillary was educated at some of America’s finest institutions. Palin couldn’t get through college without transferring 6 times. If Palin can’t handle college level thinking/analysis, how is she supposed to run a country with all its nuanced issues? How can someone who “I betchya” can’t point out Iraq, Iran, Palestine, Israel, Libya, Siriya, or China on a map, possibly have anything useful to say about foreign policy? Cafferty’s outburst on CNN was legit: I respect the man for pointing out the obvious, when idiots like Wolf Blitzer sit there and defend this woman for her incompetency. It’s absolutely not excusable. Hillary may have been qualified, but she lost fair and square. That’s how elections ought to be: fair and square, not folksy and joe-hoe-shmoe-y.
Is some ditz from Alaska seriously charging a man who is by profession trained as a constitutional lawyer, graduating from the TOP of his class, about “socialism” and “that’s not what America’s about”… I want to ask you Mrs. Palin, what is America about then?
Executive experience my ass. You could put a moose in Palin’s position and it would do roughly the same job as Palin has done. At least it wouldn’t charge the state for its personal business.

Posted by: anonymousjoe | October 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Regarding several comments here about Hillary being the “runner up” – FYI: Hillary got MORE votes than Obama (or anyone else in the history of presidential primaries) so to refer to her as a runner up is not valid.
To compare her level of support with Huckabee’s (i.e. why didn’t McCain choose Huckabee as VP since he was the “runner up”) is just flat out stupid – McCain beat Huckabee by miles and the GOP race was settled by March 3rd.
Meantime, Hillary was whooping Obama’s a** in state after state as he barely limped across the finish line on June 3rd and while still losing primaries to Hillary.
Regardless – we are where we are. Two weak candidates – one young man with no experience and an old man with no judgment.
As to the comments from Hillary supporters that Hillary will be selected by Obama for his cabinet – I hope you are right but I have seen no signs that Obama will do anything for Hillary regardless of the fact that she got 18 million (or 50%) of the democratic primary vote.
Hillary 2012!

Posted by: ch | October 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

matt and Jenny Rome: between you there’s more horse puckey than at a rodeo.

Posted by: Sune | October 22, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Palin said that if elected, she would seek to spread that opportunity to other women around the world, especially for those in countries facing persecution where women are “murdered in honor killings, places where women are sold like commodities in the nightmare world of the sex trade, and places where baby girls are unwelcome as a matter of state policy and their mothers are forced to have abortions.”
================
OH you MEAN LIKE the UNITED NATIONS’s MILLENIUM GOALS that you BASHED OBAMA for voting FOR, but then like the HUGE hipocrite you ARE you USED AS YOUR VERY OWN DEBUTANT PARTY SCENE SINCE YOU LACK ANY FOREIGN LEADER DIPLOMACY EXPERIENCE???
Girl you can fool SOME women, but not ALL women…

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

gopalin – Colin Powell did not endorse McCain, he endorsed Obama.

Posted by: Jen | October 22, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

No the most frightening is Obama is less qualified and Joe has a few marbles missing and he is Obama’s backup and all the metro highly excited high on redbull fast talking tree huging progressive male and females on tv can’t change it.

Posted by: Bishop | October 22, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Regardless – we are where we are. Two weak candidates – one young man with no experience and an old man with no judgment.
Posted by: ch | Oct 22, 2008 11:27:56 AM
======================
Sorry to be picky, but I believe you meant to say “one young WOMAN with no experience, and an old man with no judgement”
You’re WELCOMED! :)

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

If you don’t like factcheck, try ontheissues.org.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Obama did not pick Hillary because of Bill. Besides, Obama is more of a man than McCain will ever be. Obama’s not just gonna pick Hillary to get the women’s vote! That is totally not Obama. This is something McCain is doing, picking that eskimo to get the women’s vote!

Posted by: ksquarex | October 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

ch~ She only got more votes if you count FL and MI, where Obama did not campaign. She tried to change the rules later when she didn’t have the votes without them. Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in MI. Don’t be so whiny. It was a tough fight, and Obama won it. And, he would give her a cabinet position, but I think she will be speaker of the house (and do a darn good job of it)

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Susan-1: Now I have an “all that” attitude? WOW. Enough said. My case is made.

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

If the Republicans are such big fans of Hillary, why didn’t McCain ask Hillary to be his running mate? Is it because Republicans actually hate Hillary?

Posted by: anthony | October 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Did Clinton ignore the intelligence reports that a plane would fly into the WTC? Hmmm… I think that was a guy named Bush.—
Heather- Clinton did nothing. he was tested and challenged several times and did nothing. Bush was tested and challanged and fought back and since then nothing has happened to us since then. Clinton ignored a lot more than Bush did. i know Bush is not the favorite here and that is fine. but if we are gong to point fingers.. your precious dems are as much as responsble for this whole mess, just as the reps are.. as for Fannie and Freddie, Franklin Raines cooked the book and walked away with 100 million dollars. and he is a dem.. even the NYT is starting to figure it out that this whole mess is 80 percent on the dems who conitnued to lie and aviod regulation (maybe to cause this collaspe so they could have a dem superpower in the house). Clinton admitted twice that the dems are to be blamed. WSJ has confirmed this. rep are guilty too. so no one is perfect here. and explain to me how are we going to opay for alll of Obama’s proposal? he even said no one likes taxes but we will have to raise them.. McCain said not to raise them because it will lead to a depression…. there is new tape out there that confirms Ayer stating that he is more like a Marxist, Obama’s buddy, not just a guy from the street. Obama is a marxist, he even has the communist party endorsing him.. is that what you guys want? you want to be like russia??

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

ems – I merely gave you facts and you went full on “B” with me right out of the gate. Have a nice day.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Hillary will not be selected by Obama for his cabinet because he will never ever win this general election.
He is a fraud and he will soon be exposed as such.
Where is his real Birth Certificate?
Why does he not want to show Americans his real Birth Certificate and not one that he demonstrated on his bogus site?
Barack Hussein Obama, or Barry Soetero were you actually born in America?
Americans await your proof.

Posted by: TerryDo | October 22, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Wow, a lot of agitated, leftest, cool aid drinkers. Any one who studies her background honestly, knows Palin would have a positive impact on American politics. The wild comments from the left proves that Palin’s positive leadership is ruffling left wing feathers. Keep it up! Obama is inexperienced, a phoney and a socialist. Wake up. Don’t want his cruel, sexest, racist America. Palin is a straight talker and will make an outstanding VP! Go Palin/McCain!

Posted by: DAP | October 22, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

If McCain wanted the Hillary vote: He should have picked Hillary as HIS VP running mate.
(a) she would have “stood up” to his party on every issue.
(b) she would have finally cracked the so-called “glass ceiling”
(c) she wouldn’t have flumoxed her interview with Couric
(d) she would have been a damn good choice to complement McCain’s nutty off-the-handle and thoughtless approach to everything.
…aside from Hillary, there are plenty of respectable and smart women senators out there… but no, he passes all of them up, to pick a no name, no credit, no brain, hockey moose from Alaska.
Smartest person on Energy policy in the US my ass: Whatever happened to all the PhDs out there who are out there finding us new energy solutions? Was the nuk-you-lar reactor technology something Joe-the-shmuck-plumber-wannabe built in his backyard? Why didn’t you pick someone who had a degree in Physics? Someone who actually knew something about how safe and secure they were? How about someone who has other kinds of experience? Seriously McCain, Palin? Is your senility getting the best of you? Or did you just let Karl Rove’s protege and hyper-active monkey, Steve Schmidt, take over what used to be a respectable and dignified man?

Posted by: HillaryVoters | October 22, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I’m so sick of all this talk about “real America” and the widespread contempt for “liberal metropolitan elites.” I live in New York City, a city with more people than the least populated eleven states combined. If you want to see what real America really looks like, come to my neighborhood: America is both rich and poor, black and white and hispanic and asian, educated and uneducated and everything in-between. America is incredibly diverse. That diversity and the freedoms that allow such diversity is what this country represents, and it sickens me to hear a total dismissal of tens of millions of urban people in defense of middle-class, suburban, Christian whites.

Posted by: Andy | October 22, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

gopalin – “Wag the dog.” The phrase used by republicans to go after Clinton regarding his “obsession” with OBL. There are many quotes of republicans criticizing him over it. So, which is it? He did nothing? He was obsessed? Then if you consider had the republican witch hunts backed off maybe he’d have had more focus on a job . . . . And lastly? Bush shelving the huge intel report about it all as soon as he took office.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

gopalin,
You are right when you say that there are a lot of fingers to be pointed when it comes to the current financial crisis. Clinton started out to provide more opportunities for home ownership and it sparked a multitude of decisions that ultimately led us here.
But all this Socialist/Marxist/Communist claims are just fear tactics. We already have TONS of socialist-leaning policies: social security, public schools, medicaid, medicare, the US postal service….I could go on and on and bring you right up to date with the recent bailout package- the most socialist thing we’ve ever seen!! The fed owning shares of banks!!! THE HORROR.
We will never be a communist society, and we will never be a fully capitalist society. We’ve always been somewhere in the middle.
So don’t fall into the trap. It’s all just a distraction to keep you from the issues.
And remember, Obama is proposing the removal of tax breaks for the highest tax brackets. Thats all. It’s a similar progressive tax structure to Clinton’s policy; which, as I’ve shown, produced unpreciedented economic growth.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

gopalin–Clinton had intelligence on Osama. He didn’t attack for fear of civilian casualties. He assembled his staff each morning to assess risks and threats. All of this stopped under Bush. The writing was on the wall, and yet nothing was done by Bush and his administration. Read the book. This goes all the way back to Carter. Reagan and Bush supplied the Taliban in Afghanistan with weapons to defeat the Soviets. Clinton did far more to keep you safe than Bush has ever done. Go ahead and talk about Ayers some more. The American people don’t care. Tell me how McCain will make you better off in the next 4 years. Tell me how in the world you think Sarah Palin would handle a crisis. Obama is not a socialist or a marxist. You have been thrown one silly story after another. Look at their policies and their votes. Under Bush, the top earners of this country have increased their salaries by 15% while the middle class’ salaries are flatlined. Obama only suggests going back to tax rates as they were under Reagan. Our taxes have always been progressive.

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Wow that is an ugly statement from HillaryVoters
…aside from Hillary, there are plenty of respectable and smart women senators out there… but no, he passes all of them up, to pick a no name, no credit, no brain, hockey moose from Alaska
see you all later

Posted by: Bishop | October 22, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

gopalin
Factcheck is funfef by the Annenberg FOUNDATION, which neither Obama or Ayers were ever a part of.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Now the birth certificate story. Yeah, the lefties are “shaking in their boots” over this. Do you McCain supporters have anything positive to say about McCain’s policies? Is there anything to like about McCain/Palin, or are there just stab-in-the-dark attacks on Obama left?

Posted by: heather | October 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

since then nothing has happened to us since then.
==========================
are you SERIOUS MAN?!
do you NOT READ THE NEWS?
do you KNOW how many of our SONS AND DAUGHTERS AND MOTHERS AND FATHERS AND HUSBANDS AND WIVES have DIED since 9/11???
THIRTYTHOUSANDSEVENHUNDREDANDTWENTYTRHEE!!!!!!!
YOU ARSE!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Andy, I have been waiting for you big city slickers to get vocal about this. I can’t imagine how anybody in “evil” Chicago could vote for them now. Bottom line? They divide in their campaigns, and it’s absurd to think they’d be remotely bi-partisan. Heck, they have groups that do nothing but promote “liberal bashing.” That’s real American. Well, not really.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

http://www.womenforjohnmccain.com/
Enough said.
Assuming you’re a resonably intelligent woman who actually believes in women’s rights and women’s progress and wants to eventually reach a point where women get equal-pay-for-equal work, then the choice is clear: Obama/Biden ’08
If you’re a woman who votes for McPalin, you deserve to be passed up at job interviews time and time again; and yes, you deserve to be paid less than a man, because a smart man wouldn’t vote against his own self interest, like you do time and time again.
Stupid people are stupid, because they never pick people who would actually help them – they pick people “they want to have a beer with” or “can understand what its like to be a mom”. Woe is me: I’m a hockey (/soccer) mom, and I need the world to understand how hard that is. Get yourself together for god’s sake.

Posted by: women who dont get it | October 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

DUDE! people like that just MAKE MAD!!! my freaking fingers are shakin!
“nothing has happened to us since then”
yeah like, American’s who die in foreign soil DONT COUNT, their families shouldn’t mourn them we shouldn’t respect their memory
they don’t count’
OH MY GOD! how can there be SUCH IGNORANCE and such DESPICABLE APATHY!!!
OOOOOOH i am SO voting ANTI REPUBLICAN! you can have a BROOM running for president and I WILL NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN! THEY ARE JUST NOT HUMAN!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I am sick of the division that Obama has caused this nation.
There is no way it will go away with him elected.
I will not be voting for him due to the amount of hate and divisive attacks his supporters spew forth.

Posted by: Indy in WI | October 22, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Indy in WI – Thanks for the laugh today. I needed one. I suppose if you think “knowing the facts” is “hate” . . . .

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Hillary will not be selected by Obama for his cabinet because he will never ever win this general election.
He is a fraud and he will soon be exposed as such.
Where is his real Birth Certificate?
Why does he not want to show Americans his real Birth Certificate and not one that he demonstrated on his bogus site?
Barack Hussein Obama, or Barry Soetero were you actually born in America?
Americans await your proof.
Posted by: TerryDo | Oct 22, 2008 11:36:46 AM
=====================
MAN SHUT UP
it is not standard that a candidate to US PRESIDENT have TO SHOW his birth certificate to the world SO SHUT UP.
WHERE’S BUSH’S?
WHERE’S CLINTON’S?
WHERE’S MCCAIN’S?
WELL GO THERE AND FIND OBAMA’S
GO FIND IT YOUR DARN SELF IF YOU SOOO MUCH NEED IT, ONCE YOU SEE IT, WILL YOU VOTE FOR HIM?
WILL YOU???”
ok SO HERE!
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg
AND THE SEAL’S ON THE BACK YOU S.A!
sick of this bs!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

GIGI – I get your pain. Free Prozac for all!!! I’d say the republicans owe us that much?

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Concern-
you bring up good points and i will continue to research both sides… both sides provide good programs and funding. i think after this people will start leaning toward independent, because bothside talk and talk and present nothing. that bailout money, your honest opinion, should that had been approved?
Tell me, are you not at the least bit bothered by how the MSM has glorified Obama as the Messiah? in SF there was a picture of one of those catholic prayer candles and they put Obama’s face on it as if he was the christ. now come on, isn’t that a bit to extreme? what about his attack on Joe the Plumber? Joe the plumber was vetted more than obama was

Posted by: gopalin | October 22, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

I think its because she is the embodiment of the American Dream why she bothers these space age women so much, HIllary types- Business smart but not smart enoughto hold a family together.
I see virtue in her something I teach my daughters
A irtuous woman has the ability to lead
Also it is her Christian Values that makes her so appealing. How can such a folksy lady be Vice President they say.
She is not the technocrat or diplomat or businesswoman- She is the Mom
At least her husband is by her side- That my friends gives her more credit that 90% of her opponents

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

GIGI – I get your pain. Free Prozac for all!!! I’d say the republicans owe us that much?
Posted by: Susan-1 | Oct 22, 2008 11:49:51 AM
==========================
or a six pack at least!
is that GOPALIN idiot still typin???
tell me! is over 35K dead not ENOUGH???? hellooooooooooooooooooo!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

gopalin Obama got vetter months ago after already surviving the SAME attacks you see coming off the McCain camp. They’re not even original – Hillary invented them. The guy suing over the birth certificate? Known freak Hillary supporter. Testiment to the need for tort reform – as in “loser pays all.” I got just as freaked out over the “over the top and then some” Bush love that went on for years in this country.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Thank your stars that you people don’t rule for the majority.

Posted by: Counting on fingers | October 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

I find it laughable that people are “afraid” of communism and socialism. Those policies actually BENEFIT Joe-The-Shmo more than Capitalism ever will.
The majority of people who are pissed off at Wall Street Bankers and Corporate CEOs with Golden Parachutes, are basically saying that they dislike capitalist greed.
It is even more infuriating that people who get Cs and Ds in high school and who never go to college, think they know what Socialism is, to be making outlandish claims that “we are headed towards socialism”
News for Joe Hoes: If you believe that everyone has a right to healthcare (which is a morally and biblically upright stance to take, ACTUALLY) then you support a socialist policy, numbnuts. So “socialism”, as we are practicing it, can’t be so bad huh? Maybe have an open mind instead of jumping on the “that’s anti-america” bandwagon huh?
Why indeed does Joe the Shmo who makes $40K a year, worry that his fantasy salary of $250K, is being taxed by Obama’s plan?
On the one hand we despise corporate greed, on the other hand, when it comes to “giving back” to the country that gave you the opportunity to become wealthy, you suddenly snap back and say “that’s my money”. I call such people ingrates who are the very embodiment of what’s wrong with this country: people who are deep down greedy like wall street CEOs but who don’t make the same paychecks, who sit on self-righteous bandwagons, until they become rich and greedy themselves.

Posted by: socialism | October 22, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Desperate Sarah and McCain- two devils together- they have nothing for America but so they reach in their bag of Halloween tricks for more garbage. Hillary will be on the team but where will poor Sarah Palin be- In Alaska hopefully being impeached or somthing. Hillary was in Florida yesterday kicking some butt****Maybe Hillary will send you a post card from the Obama team- NOT.

Posted by: LOWES4321 | October 22, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

can such a folksy lady be Vice President they say.
She is not the technocrat or diplomat or businesswoman- She is the Mom
At least her husband is by her side- That my friends gives her more credit that 90% of her opponents
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 11:52:47 AM
=======================
what’s wrong with single mothers now?
Look I’m a single mom and I’d be FAR more qualified than Gvnr Palin for VP. I have WAY more Foreign Affairs knowledge and a “slightly” higher education and academic degrees. My problem with her (and with all that’s folksy) is LACK OF DIPLOMACY. you can’t send a dog to do diplomacy, and you can’t win the world over with guns and rethoric, that’s a no-brainer.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

gopalin,
Good questions…
I don’t know how I feel about the bailout. I think I feel the way people on both sides of the aisle feel; that it sucks, but the fallout could have been even more devestating and something had to be done. I was actually hoping that we might give it some time to see if the market corrected itself. I don’t support giving banks any more money, and I don’t support refinancing mortgages.
I am not bothered by the MSM. People use the messiah term in a derogatory way to suggest that Obama supporters are blithely following him in blind faith. So I don’t think they’re glorifying him…it’s an attack on him. Either way, I make my decisions based on the research I do. And the MSM is always only part of the story with it’s own slant. If you’re saying you think it’s blasphemy, that’s a different story. I dont’ believe so.
Joe the plumber got more than he bargained for. You may know that the McCain campaign had this all planned out, to the point of having a camera in his living-room to capture his reaction to the debates. The MSM is going after him because the average American loves that crap. So they’re providing a service that the public is demanding. Who is ultimately responsible for that?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

gopalin,
Good questions…
I don’t know how I feel about the bailout. I think I feel the way people on both sides of the aisle feel; that it sucks, but the fallout could have been even more devestating and something had to be done. I was actually hoping that we might give it some time to see if the market corrected itself. I don’t support giving banks any more money, and I don’t support refinancing mortgages.
I am not bothered by the MSM. People use the messiah term in a derogatory way to suggest that Obama supporters are blithely following him in blind faith. So I don’t think they’re glorifying him…it’s an attack on him. Either way, I make my decisions based on the research I do. And the MSM is always only part of the story with it’s own slant. If you’re saying you think it’s blasphemy, that’s a different story. I dont’ believe so.
Joe the plumber got more than he bargained for. You may know that the McCain campaign had this all planned out, to the point of having a camera in his living-room to capture his reaction to the debates. The MSM is going after him because the average American loves that crap. So they’re providing a service that the public is demanding. Who is ultimately responsible for that?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

She fires up both sides Liberal and Conservatives That is because she is so effective at what she IS- the No-nonsense Reformer Not Changer Like OBama- Reform we dont want no Marxist type social proggrammes now, or no Middle Class Bail-out
FeedThe POOR man

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

If you follow her argument, then McCain should have not passed over Mitt R. He had the 2nd place tally in the GOP votes.
Trying to pit one class of americans against other Americans is just plain wrong. Its more and more obvisous that palin is not all she is cracked up to be. While she excites teh GOP base, she has alienated the moderates and the independents.
She is just another good ole boy right out of Alaska. Talks a good game, but loves to dip into the public trough.

Posted by: scott jeffries | October 22, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I’m marrying a Navy vet who volunteered after high school for 4 years so this is very close to me. Do you think that Obama has a sound plan to handle this war??? If anyone has the ability to clean up this mess is McCain who has BENN IN THE MILITARY for 20+ years. Do you really think someone who has truly served his country and suffered in as a POW isn’t going to take our military actions seriously??? We’re in the spot we’re in- what matters now is what we do now and the worst idea is to put someone in office who didn’t even think it was important enough to enlist in our forces to begin with, let alone have any experience with foreign relations. COME ON!!!

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

It is funny watching all these left-wing slimeballs relentlessly attack Sarah Palin. Anyone who tries to suggest that Paalin is not a feminist, or even a real woomaan, should go to CSPAN’s website and watch her Alaska Governor inaugural speech where she touches on all the same issues, She is not simply appealing to jilted Hillary supporters but speaking from her own heart and mind.

Posted by: Scott | October 22, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

I think its because she is the embodiment of the American Dream why she bothers these space age women so much, HIllary types- Business smart but not smart enoughto hold a family together.
I see virtue in her something I teach my daughters
A irtuous woman has the ability to lead
Also it is her Christian Values that makes her so appealing. How can such a folksy lady be Vice President they say.
She is not the technocrat or diplomat or businesswoman- She is the Mom.
***********************************
I am a stay at home mom. I’m going with if your teenager is preggers? Your son on drugs and forced to enlist? Paying people to raise the other ones after you’ve so obviously “lost” your two oldest? Taking a far more involved job after losing the first two? Wellllll . . . not MY idea of mom of the year nor hardly a great example of “holding the family together.”

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Nothing against single Moms My Mom was a single Mom-
But Palin is living a dream every single Mom has dreamt of- God Bless Her and God Bless America
As for these people who talk about Obama like a messiah- he is the Messiah Hollywood sent you wake up America- and get the log out of your eyes.
It is not because he is black it is because he distrust Americas Ability to fulfill its role as Big Brother worldwide- he distrust Wll Street as his presidency nears WallStreet Tumbles- I wonder Why
Call that the Obama effect

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

> I think its because she is the
> embodiment of the American Dream why
> she bothers these space age women so
> much, HIllary types- Business smart
> but not smart enoughto hold a family
> together.
> I see virtue in her something I teach
> my daughters
WOW. You are an idiot. You assume “hillary types” aren’t smart enough to hold a family together? Really? Did you notice that despite the fact that both Bill and Hillary clinton are “working parents” that their kid Chelsea Clinton has also gone to some of the finest colleges in the land, on her own merit, and is now working for McKinsey? Whereas, you idolize a woman who constantly pops out babies, who CANT actually hold her family together, as evidenced by the fact that she COULDNT prevent her daughter from F’in the hockey player in the first place. Christian values? My ass.
Let me remind you: They will say, “Lord, Lord, open to us; and he will say, I know you not.”
> A virtuous woman has the ability to
> lead. Also it is her Christian Values
> that makes her so appealing. How can
> such a folksy lady be Vice President
> they say.
> She is not the technocrat or diplomat
> or businesswoman- She is the Mom
> At least her husband is by her side- ?> That my friends gives her more credit > that 90% of her opponents
Let me remind you. Todd Palin, works at BP. An oil company. If she was put in office, do you seriously think a woman who can’t turn down $300,000 dresses is going to say “Thanks! But No Thanks!” when the Oil companies lobby her with millions of dollars? Let’s not fool ourselves, she is in it for the Cash. So is Todd. That and the sex (where do you suppose all those babies come from?)

Posted by: truthhurts | October 22, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Scott – I keep just donating more and more money to Obama (I have never donated in my life) just because I so often read people like you call those people in that other party names. Do tell, did she give her speech with some real sentence structure, or was it more fragments? I have a hard time getting the point she’s trying to make.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I don’t think that McCain’s veteran status demonstrates any strategic knowlege that will help us fix our course in the war (of course, I honor and respect and thank him for his service). McCain voted with Bush most of the time on the failed policies in iraq…I don’t trust that he has the intention to do anything different- and I am not convinced he has the diplomatic wherewithall to forsee foreigh-relations issues. He seems to have a knee-jerk response to everything…his campaign, the economic crisis…I’m just not seeing the steady leadership in him that I think we sorely need.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Scott I think Palin attacked half of America when she called some of us real Americans.

Posted by: annie | October 22, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I support am Supporting John McCain and Palin, because I do not like what I read or hear about Obama. To here Obama speak I cant help but be impressed with his tone and his skill my doubts about Obama have to do with his judgment and his associations! When I here him talk about Iran not being a threat or talk about the Russia/Georgia conflict I cant help and think he has not Idea on how things work in the world. And to hear Biden say he will be tested scares me! We do not need a President that will be tested in office McCain has been tested and people know he will be tough and will react with force if required. I am not to happy about Obama’s views on “sharing the wealth”. I also don’t like the fact that Obama has been less truthful about his ties to Rezko, Ayres and Rev. Wright. There is more to the story and he has had to shift his position on Ayres three time to clarify it from just a Guy in the neighborhood to I served on a board with him to I thought he had changed! I am not saying Obama is a terrorist or supports Ayres tactics, but I do think a presidential Candidate should show better judgment in associations. Hillary I could have supported but not Obama. I wish we could all agree to disagree without the name calling and insults.I love America I believe I live in the best Country on earth and for all its problems it is far better than other places. I believe McCain and Palin Both Love America and want it to improve and thrive. I also believe the same about Obama and Biden. All of these candidates love America! I believe all of you Love America as well we just have different opinions that does not make us bad people or stupid it just means we disagree and we should leave it at that. Let people share opinions good or bad and use all information to make a decision, but not to look at the whole picture is wrong! Obama does have some skeletons in his closet as does McCain you have to look at the good and bad about both of them and make a decision. But lets stop the name calling on both sides.

Posted by: batesba74 | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

“For all of you mocking Obama’s experience, here’s a little fact (not that it would matter to you). One other president had exactly 8 years in the Illinois state senate and 2 years in the US senate.
His name was Abraham Lincoln.”
Abe was agnostic, so you wouldn’t catch him sitting in a church of hate for 20 years.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

“For all of you mocking Obama’s experience, here’s a little fact (not that it would matter to you). One other president had exactly 8 years in the Illinois state senate and 2 years in the US senate.
His name was Abraham Lincoln.”
Abe was agnostic, so you wouldn’t catch him sitting in a church of hate for 20 years.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Esm,
Obama has lots of experience in foreign relations both academically and practically. At Columbia University
he studied Political Science with specialization in international relations, and wrote his thesis topic: Soviet nuclear disarmament. He is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European Affairs, a member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; a member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; a member of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs; shares responsibility for the bipartisan Coburn-Obama Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, requiring full online disclosure of all entities receiving federal funds, and the bipartisan Lugar-Obama Cooperative Proliferation Detection, Interdiction Assistance, and Conventional Threat Reduction Act of 2006, deepening non-proliferation work with WMD and including surface-to-air missiles, land mines, and other weapons that may be used by terrorists. Also worked with Coburn to end the abuse of no-bid contracts in the wake of disasters.
on and on. You really shoud check it out.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Palin is a demagogue – a person who gains popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people. They often use lies and distortion !
Regardless of what Palin says, Sen. Obama chose the RIGHT VP for himself and the world who would best assist him in successfully leading teh country in the 21st century. America is broken and in desperate need of a healing leader.
Sen. Clinton has already come to terms with it wasn’t meant to be for her. God has chosen Sen. Obama for such a task!
So no matter what McCain-Palin or their supporters think or say, their campaign and personal attacks of hatred, fear, racism, and division WILL NEVER PREVAIL against Sen. Obama – this nation’s next Commander-in-Chief !!!
You [ Barack Obama], are from God and have overcome them [the enemy's attacks, schemes, and plots ] , because the one [God] who is in you [ Barack Obama] is greater than the one [the enemy ] who is in the world. – 1 John 4:4
No weapon forged against you [ Barack Obama] will prevail, and you [ Barack Obama] will refute every tongue that accuses you [ Barack Obama] . This is the heritage of the servants [ Barack Obama] of the LORD, and this is their [ Barack Obama] vindication from me,” declares the LORD. – Isaiah 54:17
” I [ God ] will send my terror ahead of you [ Barack Obama] and throw into confusion every nation you [ Barack Obama] encounter. I [ God ] will make all your [ Barack Obama] enemies turn their backs and run.” – Exodus 23:27
The Lord will rescue me [ Barack Obama] from every evil attack and will bring me [ Barack Obama] safely to his heavenly kingdom. – 2 Timothy 4:18
11 For he will command his angels concerning you [ Barack Obama] to guard you [ Barack Obama ] in all your ways; 12 they will lift you [ Barack Obama ] up in their hands, so that you [ Barack Obama ] will not strike your [his] foot against a stone. 13 You [ Barack Obama ] will tread upon the lion and the cobra; you [ Barack Obama ] will trample the great lion and the serpent. – Psalm 91:11-13
I have given you [ Barack Obama ] authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm you [ Barack Obama ]. – Luke 10:19
It’s time for the American people to get it right and NOT vote for McCain-Palin, instead vote for change. It’s time for this country to turn the page and seek a new and better future for ourselves and our children.It’s time for REAL change in Washington, it’s time to elect Barack Obama for president !
Obama-Biden are the wiser and stronger team to solve the crucial challenges we have in this nation and abroad !
Amen.

Posted by: Barack Obama IS Our next president and Joe Biden is the VP | October 22, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

> I’d also like to see someone with some
> actual clean-government street cred in > the White House. McCain’s got some of > that, but this woman pretty much beat > the corruption out of the Alaska
> Republican Party with a pipe wrench.
She IS the damned corruption, when will you blind-sided moose lovers see this? She freaking uses public funds for private family trips and events. She fires people she doesn’t like – not because of some fundamental thing they *did wrong* but because she doesn’t like them. Can we say totalitarian dictator bitch?

Posted by: holycrapyouarestupid | October 22, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

It should makes you mad eh! she being the angel of light she is> You just deplore that.
The more the media crucifies her image the clearer her personality becomes- it is not only one of charm but generous benevolence that touches to the true meaning of American- the I can do it attitude- not measuring success by setbacks but by overall outcome.
I will vote with my heart for Palin
She is The Joan of Arc of America
I believe in America

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

“I am a stay at home mom. I’m going with if your teenager is preggers? Your son on drugs and forced to enlist? Paying people to raise the other ones after you’ve so obviously “lost” your two oldest? Taking a far more involved job after losing the first two? Wellllll . . . not MY idea of mom of the year nor hardly a great example of “holding the family together.”
You should probably spend less time reading tabloids. Rots your brain.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

lets bring “god” into the equation
the single most demonic thing according to Christianity in its fullness is stem cell research which Obama supports and Palin rejects

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Sarah Palin: Dictatorial Totalitarian Wolf in Mooses clothing, who hires people she likes, fires people who don’t agree with her, and goes on the attack, when substantively, she has no substance of her own to stand on.
I’m sick of her repetitive talking points: Gov. of Alaska. Mayor of Wasilla. Blah Blah. Freedom. Blah Blah. Pro-America. Blah Blah. Putin. Blah Blah. Healthcare. Blah Blah. Joe Blow. Blah Blah. Moose-hunter. Will getbacktoya katie bullshitter.

Posted by: wolfinmooseclothing | October 22, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

MOMO – Proclaiming an “ethics violator” vindictive type is Joan of Arc? One that spews division and hate speech? I’m going with undiagnosed schizophrenia

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

MOMO,
Please point me to the verse in the bible about stem cell research.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Yeah Mach, that boy enlisted cauz they’re so patriotic. And what was that group again that the shadow governor Todd was involved in????

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

“Sarah Palin: Dictatorial Totalitarian Wolf in Mooses clothing, who hires people she likes, fires people who don’t agree with her”
Which administration in the history of American politics hasn’t done that?

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

As an business manager, I look at work experience and associations of the people I’d like to hire. Yes, I listen to them talk but only after I’ve thoroughly vetted them. I go through the same process when deciding on a Presidential candidate to support and I would encourage anyone who’s still undecided to do the same because, as Joe Biden once said, “past is prologue”. Everything else is just rhetoric.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

I’m still trying to figure out what on earth a “loyalty test” is – when you group fire and then catch heat over it. She just kind of gets off on the power.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Mack,
You are right here. Palin has a certain amount of power to let people go. Clinton did it, oh boy did he do it! There is the question of her ethics (allowing her husband access to private documents, using taxpayer money innapropriately to pay for stuff for her kids), though I’m not sure how big a deal it is until we see the results of the investigations.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I appreciate Sarah’s candor and I can understand why the parasites who take this country for granted are offended. Thats why all the mental midgets have fallen for someone who tells them what they want to hear. Reminds me of animal farm pathetic.

Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 22, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

By the way, Sarah Palin supports stem cell research but not EMBRYONIC stem cell research. Huge ethical difference.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

It’s more about judgment. Letting people go with good reps, to replace them with friends from high school lacking any sort of background? That type of thinking is how we got “Brownie.” And she did not have the power to try to fire the bro in law, no matter how bad anybody thought he was. So, “over-reach” of power on that one. I call that dangerous.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

> It should makes you mad eh! she being
> the angel of light she is> You just
> deplore that.
> The more the media crucifies her image
> the clearer her personality becomes-
> it is not only one of charm but
> generous benevolence that touches to
> the true meaning of American- the I
> can do it attitude- not measuring
> success by setbacks but by overall
> outcome.
> I will vote with my heart for Palin
> She is The Joan of Arc of America
> I believe in America
I’m sick of twits who equate the crucifiction of Jesus: the punishment of a sinless man, with the media’s “crucifiction” of a VP candidate. She deserves to be put on the spot and asked pointed questions about really tough issues. They asked Hillary tough TOUGH questions as well: the different is Hillary passed. People don’t criticize Obama because he CAN do this: He didn’t graduate at the top of his class at Harvard because he was an idiot. Palin can’t do this: She doesn’t know cowturd to make any real statements. All she knows is who is “pro america” and “anti america”…those are the same kind of lines that Hitler used to rile up the Nazi party. I’m certain there are KKK-ers and Skinheads out there who love this woman because she reminds them of their fearless leaders.
Genius: I am NOT the damned media. Just a really really concerned citizen who doesn’t buy her “angel of light” crap. Don’t forget Satan was an angel too, until he used God to launch his own political career.
It’s people like you who vote “with your heart for Palin” that will screw our country and send it to the dog heap. Neither McCain nor Palin can handle or even understand the current economic crisis, so they stick to their talking points and attack Obama/Biden instead of addressing the serious problems we have before us.

Posted by: mejoe | October 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC have done everything they possibly could–from misleading negative headlines to attacking her family–attempting to discredit Governor Palin since her candidacy was announced.
They cannot seem to accept that Governor Palin is a proven strong, and effective leader [with more experience than the PRESIDENTIAL candidate on the Democratic ticket], and who happens to be a woman.
McCain/Palin ’08

Posted by: LJC | October 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

For one week, let no one speak negatively about candidates, then convince me to who I should vote for by using positive views about your favorite choice. Can you do it? So far I do not think you can.
That is why I am voting for who I feel is the best choice without listening to anyone with negative writings or name calling. Facts are helpful but twisting the truth and denying proof and calling names or belittling is by far a sad reason for calling yourself a free American.

Posted by: Counting on fingers | October 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Whenever I hear the republicans talk about real Americans, I think about that jerk from Virginia who thought he was going to run for president. He got caught on film calling the cameraman a macacca. Remember that? It turned out that he wasn’t a real american by his definition. His mother was a holocast survior. When confronted by Fox News about this: Allen’s indignant response, criticizing Fox for “making aspersions,” attracted the attention of the national press, prompting speculation that he wanted to conceal any Jewish ancestry.
He is so ignorant, he called calling him a Jew an aspersion. I was and am Jewish and I am insulted by this. Thank goodness he disappeared back under a rock.
So when the reactionary faction of republican party talk about real america, they’re talking about bigoted small mindedness, creationism, going back to the 19th Century, while the rest of the world passes us by. They believe in international jewish conspiracies. To me they just like the Taliban in Afghanistan, but they are our own little cuddly Taliban.

Posted by: whatever | October 22, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Sarah’s candor? If you mean her willingness to show her evangelical convictions, then I’m with you. But she has not been as forthright with documents regarding her ethics violations, she’s accused of falsifying reimbursement forms, she won’t share her medical records…
I think she’s only outspoken about things that pander to her base.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Let’s rock the vote ladies. McCain/Palin 08 and slam Obama in the face. It is high time we stand up for our own gender. High time!!!

Posted by: Mary O'Bryan | October 22, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Palin is right on this one. Obama failed his first real test as the Democratic presidential nominee – select a running mate to energize and unite the party. He didn’t come close. Not only that, but he simply reminded a lot of voters that the democratic party is not the one of equality and equal opportunity – love em or hate em, the republicans have the better record of advancing women and minorities to positions of power.

Posted by: call me crazy | October 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

has BENN IN THE MILITARY for 20+ years. Do you really think someone who has truly served his country and suffered in as a POW isn’t going to take our military actions seriously???
Posted by: esm | Oct 22, 2008 11:59:58 AM
=========================
GOOD! let’s make it Secretary of Defense, because OBVIOUSLY (um, KERRY-Bush) this was not enough to make a man President.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As for these people who talk about Obama like a messiah- he is the Messiah Hollywood sent you wake up America- and get the log out of your eyes.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MOMO
WAO! thanks for the McCain VINTAGE Campaign memory lane walk! Obama IS teh change we need, Mesiah? The ONE? THAT ONE? HUSSEIN?
I don’t care what you call him, I’m calling him MR. PRESIDENT
*********************************
I don’t think that McCain’s veteran status demonstrates any strategic knowlege that will help us fix our course in the war (of course, I honor and respect and thank him for his service).
*******************************
AGREED!
According to this “philosophy” then Hugo Chavez & Fidel Castro are GREAT LEADERS, how’s that for a socialist-communist vote?
dummies…

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Yes when the media talks of Palin, she cleans their spirits and souls up, those who wash there mouths on her get Listerine- Seriously folks Jokes aside
A vote for Palin is a vote for America and the best in us and the hopes of our Children
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong- The lack of Love has manifested n ow but it has always been there and he being President will not stop that or change that
Of all the things Bush did wheen he assumed unilateral responsibility for the Iraq War- he crystalized our friends and our enemies are.

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Sorry Mary,
I will not vote based on gender. Or color. I will vote on the issues and my beliefs. I hope you do the same.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Sorry Mary, I don’t vote on gender. And you shouldn’t either. The issues that face this country are way to important for that.

Posted by: annie | October 22, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Counting on fingers, you’ve got the right idea. It’s called rhetoric, and there’s boatloads of it everywhere you go. Ignore it. Instead, investigate the candidate’s voting records whether it be in the US Senate, IL legislature, or Palin’s executive record as Governor of AK. Remember, past is prologue no matter what you hear or read.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

lets bring “god” into the equation
the single most demonic thing according to Christianity in its fullness is stem cell research which Obama supports and Palin rejects
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 12:14:43 PM
======================
HOLY FATHER AND SON!
WHAT??! there are TEN commandments, all TEN are BAD. none badder or more DEMONIC than the other. WHAT?
are you serious?!
LMAO!
dude, what religion are you? BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY IT IS NOT CHRISTIANISM.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

MOMO – He was a bully with foreign policy, and our reputation is toast. We’re damn short on friends. We can’t afford to fight the whole planet. I’m going with the guy that isn’t going to give a “loyalty test” to every other country on the planet.
We’ll be lucky if our children ever forgive us over Bush.

Posted by: Susan-1 | October 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

the funny thing as a black When I look at marcus Mossiah garvey,Selassi 1, Martin Luther, malcolM X I kno w none of these men would endorse baracks Middle Class SELLOUT

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

By the way, Sarah Palin supports stem cell research but not EMBRYONIC stem cell research. Huge ethical difference.
I would consider Sarah Palin’s support of her daughter’s marriage to that hockey dude as the biggest support of “embryonic stem cell research” in history. Who knows w-t-f is going to come from that marriage? More white honkeys who don’t have qualifications but will do anything to usurp power? yeah. look forward to more “Mavericks” people.

Posted by: embryonicresearch | October 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

LJC – Not only have they smeared Palin (and continue to do so) they completely downplay Biden’s gaffes! Sunday, Biden pretty much warned America that if we vote for Obama, we welcome our enemies to put him to the test (Biden’s words not mine) – he said Obama’s reaction to these tests would at first seem “not right” (again his words not mine). I think America has enough to worry about right now without having to worry about being tested by foreign enemies. I voted this morning for McCain/Palin and I feel good about it.

Posted by: Voted Early and Proud | October 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Momo,
You should read the Economist a bit more. The rest of the world is pretty annoyed with Bush’s unilateralism and his inability to reach out to other leaders.
You should consider that our homeland safety is directly (but not exclusively) related to our ability to negotiate with our friends (if we have any left by this January) and the willingness to have dialogue with our enemies.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Does anyone realize that Obama could not pass a security check to get a job in the federal Government and we are trying to elect him president. The sheep are being led to the slaughter…….

Posted by: Bob C | October 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

This Hillary supporter is voting for Palin. Issues be damned. My vote is mine and I’ll use it however I see fit. Obama passed on Hillary, I’m passing on Obama.
Posted by: jose | Oct 22, 2008 9:04:22 AM
Oops, I meant McCain! A little Freudian slip there.
Posted by: jose | Oct 22, 2008 9:05:00 AM
******************************
if you were a TRUE hillary supporter and what she beleived in, you would NEVER EVER EVER vote mcain/palin. you should try voting with your head instead of casting your vote because of what you have or don’t have between your legs.

Posted by: palin's_a_man! | October 22, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Bob C,
Why is that? Do you have a reason with even a shred of proof? Or are you just fear-mongering?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

To all those fools who are supporting McCain so Hillary can run in 2012… are you that dumb and ignorant to not understand that if McPain enter office, that the US might be (a) bankrupt (b) nuked off the face of the earth by putin or (c) totalitarian. So, yeah, if McPain were in office, you can say “goodbye” to USofA given that they will accelerate the nonsense of the current administration – to the point where we are financially set back to becoming recipients of foreign aid from Somalia.
So, before you call people buttwipe, wipe your own face.

Posted by: buttwipe | October 22, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

MOMO
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong-
=============
W R O N G
Hve you spoken to anyone from PARAGUAY lately? New Zealand?
Japan?
ARGENTINA?
MEXICO?
Yes it’s been there since before Ernesto Guevara even learned how to ride a bike, but with THE INTERNET and other means of communication IT HAS PREAD more and more!
My boyfriend is on a tour had has been to all these countries in the last three weeks, and has talked to people everywhere because IT ALWAYS COMES UP (because he is American and black) and people are actually saying THIS IS THE CHANCE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THEM, that we actually CARE for JUSTICE!
how can you make such an erroneous statement?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

it seems Bush is running for President again huh,
WHy are not just not going to war anymore we are not winning them
We ran out of Somalia,Vietnam, Korea, and now we want to run out of Iraq. If we didn’t fight Iraq we would soon find ourselves in a war where we would loose 4000 brave men a day . Quote me on that

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Does anyone realize that Obama could not pass a security check to get a job in the federal Government
How so.

Posted by: Just Wondering | October 22, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

The real issue with Palin is her CRAZY association with the Pentacostals. She has stated that she expects to see the return of jesus in HER lifetime. Well according to biblical prophesy, this requires the initiation of Armageddon. THAT ALONE tells me that Sarah Palin needs to be kept FAR FAR away from the US nuclear launch codes.

Posted by: Niles Coventry | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Does anyone realize that Obama could not pass a security check to get a job in the federal Government
How so.
Posted by: Just Wondering | Oct 22, 2008 12:38:44 PM
—————
I was also wondering if a seat in the US senate did not constitute a job in teh federal government…
Maybe they are referring to a separatist party? Like Todd Palins?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

“More white honkeys who don’t have qualifications but will do anything to usurp power?”
_________________
You stay classy now…

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Reading these comments I see woman are their own worst critics, and therefore, enemies.
I was a Hillary volunteer and saw this same cruelness towards her. I just don’t get it. You don’t see Hillary out attacking another woman.
If woman ever want to be treated with respect and equally, we need to start doing it ourselves. Sarah Palin might not share some of my views, but I can still see she is a self made, accomplished woman. This meme of portraying her as stupid make me sad. She could not have gotten where she was and have the highest approval rating of any governor if she was not intelligent. She did not have any dirty money or politicians helping her rise.
It’s time for women to start standing up for all women.

Posted by: rrow | October 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

it seems Bush is running for President again huh,
WHy are not just not going to war anymore we are not winning them
We ran out of Somalia,Vietnam, Korea, and now we want to run out of Iraq. If we didn’t fight Iraq we would soon find ourselves in a war where we would loose 4000 brave men a day . Quote me on that
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 12:38:27 PM
j====================
because you say so?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Momo,
What are you talking about? That’s a serious question. You’re all over the map with accuasations and specualtions, but no proof or logical reasoning. The only common thread in all your posts is fear- and that’s just a tactic. Don’t vote emotionally. Do some research. And for god’s sake please provide reasons and proof of your outlandish claims.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

“To all those fools who are supporting McCain so Hillary can run in 2012… are you that dumb and ignorant to not understand that if McPain enter office, that the US might be (a) bankrupt (b) nuked off the face of the earth by putin or (c) totalitarian. So, yeah, if McPain were in office, you can say “goodbye” to USofA given that they will accelerate the nonsense of the current administration – to the point where we are financially set back to becoming recipients of foreign aid from Somalia.”
~~
More baseless fear tactics by the Democrats. When that doesn’t work, they resort to the mature tactic of name-calling.

Posted by: the joke is on you | October 22, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Reading these comments I see woman are their own worst critics, and therefore, enemies.
=================
what a dumb statement, I OWE so much of who I am today to my critics…
I give it to her for being the (ugh, “hottest”) governor, but nah uh! stay out of the white house. Sarah Palin is teh WORST that has happened to Feminism since Senaca falls.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Justice for who- Obamna is black he has not talked about recompense for black slavery it has been shoved under the mat, like it never happpened, when will black people be given due recompense for the harsh inhuman, bestiality of American Slavery. Lets talk about the 10,000 mexican women killed on your borders or The Ghetto Ralph Nader knocked him up about,
These places south America wants Obama now they themselves have embraced this Marxist theory of Socialism and as they speed the woprld towards a Pluperfect market system

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC have done everything they possibly could–from misleading negative headlines to attacking her family–attempting to discredit Governor Palin since her candidacy was announced.”
They all have sponsors, so we need to hit them where it hurts them the most.

Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“Palin’s a crazy Pentacostal” “Obama is a Salafist Muslim”… on and on it goes.
See? It’s all just rhetoric from lazy religious bigots who are out to scare other lazy people. So, don’t be lazy! Do your own research – on policy, on voting records, all of which you’ll find on official government websites.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

MOMO
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong-
=============
W R O N G
Hve you spoken to anyone from PARAGUAY lately? New Zealand?
Japan?
ARGENTINA?
MEXICO?
Yes it’s been there since before Ernesto Guevara even learned how to ride a bike, but with THE INTERNET and other means of communication IT HAS PREAD more and more!
My boyfriend is on a tour had has been to all these countries in the last three weeks, and has talked to people everywhere because IT ALWAYS COMES UP (because he is American and black) and people are actually saying THIS IS THE CHANCE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THEM, that we actually CARE for JUSTICE!
how can you make such an erroneous statement?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Justice for who- Obamna is black he has not talked about recompense for black slavery it has been shoved under the mat, like it never happpened, when will black people be given due recompense for the harsh inhuman, bestiality of American Slavery. Lets talk about the 10,000 mexican women killed on your borders or The Ghetto Ralph Nader knocked him up about,
These places south America wants Obama now they themselves have embraced this Marxist theory of Socialism and as they speed the woprld towards a Pluperfect market system
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 12:44:48 PM
————————
ok so the labor of getting THAT justice falls on OBAMA, but not McCain????
AND:
MOMO
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong-
=============
W R O N G
Hve you spoken to anyone from PARAGUAY lately? New Zealand?
Japan?
ARGENTINA?
MEXICO?
Yes it’s been there since before Ernesto Guevara even learned how to ride a bike, but with THE INTERNET and other means of communication IT HAS PREAD more and more!
My boyfriend is on a tour had has been to all these countries in the last three weeks, and has talked to people everywhere because IT ALWAYS COMES UP (because he is American and black) and people are actually saying THIS IS THE CHANCE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THEM, that we actually CARE for JUSTICE!
how can you make such an erroneous statement?
———————-
you can keep dishing crapola, or you can answer SOME of the MANY MANY MANY MANY MANY questions your “comments” have generated.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Here is a real American according to Sarah Palin, bigoted hypocritical cowardly, arrogant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_United_States_Senate_election,_2006#Allen.27s_Macaca_controversy

Posted by: whatever | October 22, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Hey Sarah, John McCain opposed a Senate bill that sought equal pay for women because it would lead to more lawsuits.
Why would women even vote for someone like that and why are you even dragging women into this if this is the way your running mate feels???? He has no respect for women-witness the ape rape joke he’s told and the Chelsea Clinton joke and also the vulgar word he called his own wife. He needs an intervention.

Posted by: gohomePalin | October 22, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

sorry about my typing guys i’m bad at it. Obama will win, so you need not worry all you Democrats
Obama will Win but AMERica will lose.
Recently Russia sent warships to Venezuela. Chavez is talking about a hardline South America. Anti-Americanism is suddenly Cool! They say its Bushes faultno . Its Hollywood and the Media who questions everything America does as totalitarian and egocentric and murderous.If the Media was like this 60 yrs ago we would have lost to Hitler

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Mack,
Is that a quote from The Factor? Please show me a link from one major news source that attacks Palin’s family.
I would rather poke my own eye out than vote for Palin, but I respect her family, and support her rights to the decisions she makes for them.
However, as a public figure she is open to the same scrutiny as all the other candidates. And don’t forget the baseless attacks on Obama. Go to Factcheck if you care to know.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Mcsame and his campaign have gone too crazy and off limits when calling part of US unAmerican or not real when they are behind in polls there, this is stupid and devisive and breaks American heart.
Mccain’s brother is crazier when he says Arlington,Va county where Mccain has one of his seven houses there as communist county.
Mcsame I have news for you, you do not deserve my vote when you are insulting me and my county, I am conservative republican will vote for Obama to punish you and your weak and erratic and poor response to our biggest financial crisis. Your tempervery poor handling crisis unqualified barbie palin are worst.
Mcstupid are you out mind defending tax cut for rich when people our loosing their jobs and homes. You do not feel our pain while having seven houses.

Posted by: tom | October 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

I think Obama’s pick of Biden helped him. Biden has been in the senate a long time and has lots of experience in foreign affairs. Hillary is a lot like Obama in her views and would not have added as much to the ticket as Biden.. I think Palin is just trying to cause trouble for the democratic ticket…I honestly think Palin would be good in a cat fight, since she doesn’t seem to have much in princables, but her type of smeering should not be in politics…

Posted by: AnnD52 | October 22, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Momo,
Antiamericanism isn’t SUDDENLY cool…it’s been growing steadily since about 8 months after we invaded Iraq, found no evidence of WMDs, failed to create any safety for the citizens of iraq…..shall I go on?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

The reason Senator Obama did not chose Senator Clinton was because he knew she was smarter than he was and could not stand the competition. He picks Senator Biden a long-term senator no one had heard about and is a weakling. JOBS is a three letter word GEEEEEEZZZZZZZ. What a dummie. Governer Palin has more moxie and smarts than Obama yet the only way he can win is by ATTACKING. He is the mix of his best friends and associates: Wright, Ayers, Sinclair, Rezko, Trinity Church racism and hate mongering. He is a great snake oil salesman–he can cure anything. LOL The Democrats are 80% responsible for our ecomony. After Polosi and Reed took over, everything went to HE##. Obama only has big speeches, but no real knowledge on how to fix America. I think DESPAIR if he is elected. And those weak-minded are waiting in line for their freebies ($$$).

Posted by: Mary | October 22, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

sorry about my typing guys i’m bad at it. Obama will win, so you need not worry all you Democrats
Obama will Win but AMERica will lose.
Recently Russia sent warships to Venezuela. Chavez is talking about a hardline South America. Anti-Americanism is suddenly Cool! They say its Bushes faultno . Its Hollywood and the Media who questions everything America does as totalitarian and egocentric and murderous.If the Media was like this 60 yrs ago we would have lost to Hitler
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 12:51:04 PM
=============================
ALSO POSTED BY MOMO:
The lack of Love has manifested n ow but it has always been there and he being President will not stop that or change that
========== or Maybe MOMO’s EVIL twin?
so here, besides contradict yourself, you are saying that IT IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT how our country is perceived, but that it is HOLLYWOOD’s and THE MEDIA?
And that NOT TO SEEM LIKE A TOTALITARIAN REGIME, we should have more subdued, let’s say… CENSORED? media?
like, you know… without so much FREEDOM OF SPEECH and all that JAZZ>>>>???
I believe that while Chavez received the Russian subs, and then hoped on a plane to CHINA and when arrived there admonished all the other foreign leaders WHO WERE IN NEW YORK FOR THE MILLENIUM’S GOALS SUMMIT, Ms Sarah Palin was getting herself a free meal ticket and using that very event to become aquainted with some foreign leaders.
MCCAIN WAS RUBBING HIS FOREHEAD WONDERING HOW TO TEACH THIS GIRL ANYTHING… and talking trash! how can these two idiots PROVE TO ME that they care about venezuela, russia and CHINA if they arE TOO BUSY EDUCATING PALIN?

Posted by: GIGI - momo, please ... | October 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Excuse me, but do other countries have America’s best interest at heart? I do not give a flip about what most people in other countries say or feel about us because I know that if they ever came under attack and they needed help, they would turn to us to defend them. And guess what, we would defend them, and shed our own blood for them so they could continue to live in freedom.
With few exceptions, tens-of-millions of freedom-loving Iraqis and Afghans seem to appreciate us just fine. Just ask those in our armed forces who have served in those theaters.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

NOW she taslks about women who need childcare so they can go to work. Where wsa his buzz before when a month ago it was: “If a woman can’t have a family and work at the same ime, I’d like to send that Nenaderthal back to the CAVE!!”.
I’m glad HER husband was ableto stay home with the kids and be Mr. Mom. Most working parents are working because having 2 incomes is a necessity, not a LUXURY”. I’d love it if my husband could stay home or me for that matter!!!
I’d like to make a case in point to the person from AK who said that Todd is 1/8 Native American and because of that their family is able to get free healthcare. This is TRUE because as a former healthcare administrator in WI, worked with the Oneida Tribe. All a person had to do was show they had 1/8 American Indian in their descendancy and they were IN. If they had health insurance through their job, whatever that plan did not cover,the Tribe paid 100%. If they had NO health insurance from another entity, the Tribe paid ALL their bills 100% just for having that 1/8 blood.
This is not an intent to knock Native Americans because no people in our country were so wronged but it shows Todd and Sarah are NOT telling us the whole deal either. Never mind her bridge to nowhere-she could’nt sell me anything!!! Working women have to battle with their employers ENOUGH as it is for anything. Most are still waiting for a place at work to PUMP their milk to bring home to their newborns if they’re nursing,let alone be able to bring the BABY there too and FEED them. Get real!!!!

Posted by: atomheartmother1 | October 22, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

I am a female and I feel no connection with Palin and I agree with Colin Powell, I feel she is not qualified to be VP, and certainly not the President of the United States, no way, no how. However, I can see her as a Moose Hunter. Now that fits Sara Palin.

Posted by: Jeannetta | October 22, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Mary, the majority seems to disagree with you about Palin. Her negatives outweigh her positives now. She’s only helping McCain with the base but he needs the independents to win. And they aren’t buying her.

Posted by: annie | October 22, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Excuse me, but do other countries have America’s best interest at heart? I do not give a flip about what most people in other countries say or feel about us because I know that if they ever came under attack and they needed help, they would turn to us to defend them. And guess what, we would defend them, and shed our own blood for them so they could continue to live in freedom.
With few exceptions, tens-of-millions of freedom-loving Iraqis and Afghans seem to appreciate us just fine. Just ask those in our armed forces who have served in those theaters.
Posted by: Cliff | Oct 22, 2008 12:58:56 PM
========================
well honey LEARN to give a flip. At least about these:
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Czech Rep
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
and then, think… alliances are GOOD. duh.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Palin is a dimwit. Does she know that everything she says will be reported by the media to the entire country? Instead of making more and more stupid comments that alienate people (except the far-right convers), can’t she least make comments that doesn’t keep attacking her opponents?
Using Clinton as an example this late in the game is silly, especially when Clinton is supporting Obama.
Not to mention the other day she herself would endorse an amendment to ban gay marriage. I’m not gay, but to go against McCain, who supports letting the states decide, is foolhardy since it shows the two are not unify at all. (Not to mention, she once again alienates a group who no doubt will vote Obama now.)
So keep it up, Palin. The more stupidity you spew, the more you make Obama/Biden look good. You betcha! (wink)

Posted by: GWP | October 22, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

I will not even draw a comment on Powell history which judge the mettle of a man by his actions and INACTIONs.
Even if we could disqualify Palin because of a myriaad of reason from being an effective Vp. We cannot take from her the charisma of leadership- that which inspires – if Obama is Hope of the Future. palin is the Future

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

I will not even draw a comment on Powell history which judge the mettle of a man by his actions and INACTIONs.
Even if we could disqualify Palin because of a myriaad of reason from being an effective Vp. We cannot take from her the charisma of leadership- that which inspires – if Obama is Hope of the Future. palin is the Future
—————–
GOOD! let’s get Palin her very own TALK SHOW.. now, I would LOVE to hear your response on some of the other comments you have made.
====================
MOMO
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong-
=============
W R O N G
Hve you spoken to anyone from PARAGUAY lately? New Zealand?
Japan?
ARGENTINA?
MEXICO?
Yes it’s been there since before Ernesto Guevara even learned how to ride a bike, but with THE INTERNET and other means of communication IT HAS PREAD more and more!
My boyfriend is on a tour had has been to all these countries in the last three weeks, and has talked to people everywhere because IT ALWAYS COMES UP (because he is American and black) and people are actually saying THIS IS THE CHANCE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THEM, that we actually CARE for JUSTICE!
how can you make such an erroneous statement?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

“Biden has been in the senate a long time and has lots of experience in foreign affairs.”
______________________
Yes, he has a long record in foreign affairs. However do you understand where Joe Biden stood on international issues? Let’s look most recently at the Iraq War which Biden initially supported. Prior to the surge however, when the situation was deteriorating, Biden advocated dividing Iraq up into three autonomous pieces. McCain advocated a surge strategy which both Biden and Obama opposed.
You can go further back to the Reagan years and to the end of the Cold War which led to the dissolution of the USSR and fall of European communism, and you’ll find that Biden was not a supporter of Reagan’s “peace through strength” initiatives.
So yes, Biden has a record. Question to ask yourself is, where has he been on the right of history and where has he been wrong.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

There is no Obama as a leader, there isn’t even a McCain as a leader. I tend to be more conservative, that is my personal preference, leave your one-liners at the door. But I try to walk around with my eyes open to “all” sides. _______________________ The more I learn though, the more I realize that I, and most everyone else are “Useful Idiots”. —- Watch this video from a Russian defector in 1985: This is happening just like the he said it would ___ http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1 ___ Please! Please, listen with your hearts and pass it on!

Posted by: Pappione | October 22, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Eventually Palin will morph into a Benazir Bhutto type matyr- her legacy will be that never has there been so many aroused whether negatively or positively by such simplicity and girlish awkwardness in a political leader of our times. Whether it is a testament of who she is or a spin-off of this election history will figure it out about that i am not worried. She is a compelling human being. Whi is in no way deserving of some of the vitriolic comments on these Blogs-

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Eventually Palin will morph into a Benazir Bhutto type matyr- her legacy will be that never has there been so many aroused whether negatively or positively by such simplicity and girlish awkwardness in a political leader of our times. Whether it is a testament of who she is or a spin-off of this election history will figure it out about that i am not worried. She is a compelling human being. Whi is in no way deserving of some of the vitriolic comments on these Blogs-
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 1:14:44 PM
=================
I am actually NOT SURE if this is a compliment or an insult (to either lady) but it does not matter because Palin didn’t know who Bhutto was (and by the way, didn’t pay her respects when she met her widow) CLASS!
::::::::::::::::
MOMO
Our children will not forgive us if we do otherwise, Obama says we have lost love worldwide
He is so wrong-
=============
W R O N G
Hve you spoken to anyone from PARAGUAY lately? New Zealand?
Japan?
ARGENTINA?
MEXICO?
Yes it’s been there since before Ernesto Guevara even learned how to ride a bike, but with THE INTERNET and other means of communication IT HAS PREAD more and more!
My boyfriend is on a tour had has been to all these countries in the last three weeks, and has talked to people everywhere because IT ALWAYS COMES UP (because he is American and black) and people are actually saying THIS IS THE CHANCE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE IT IS NOT JUST ABOUT THEM, that we actually CARE for JUSTICE!
how can you make such an erroneous statement?

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

OH No She DIDN’T!! ;-) LOL. She is a fine one talk. Mccain passed over Romney to pick her out of the pumpkin patch. Romney KNOWS plenty about the economy. ;-). Once, again the McCain “Theme of The Week” campaign is talking about something that Americans could care less about. They need to find a message, stick with it, try to live out these last few days with some feeling of grace, and hopefully Nov 4 they can go home for good. ;-)

Posted by: Mary Anne, Alabama | October 22, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

“Obama did not choose Hillary because she came with about 200 lbs of baggage named Bill. The concept that MCCain thought he could get all the women who were mad because Obama did not choose Hillary by selecting this rent a uterus from Alaska is absurd. We women are not interchangable. If we were I would like Angelina Jolie’s body please.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga”
I think the Palin pick was not to “get the woman vote” but rather to combat the “republican old white male” rhetoric that the Obama campaign and democrats had been playing. Did you notice their strategy was thrown for a loop when McCain picked Palin? Fortunately McCain hit the race card dollar bill incident head on and his minimized the cultural warfare angle from Obama’s campaign.
If Romney or someone else was selected as VP I guarantee “see republicans once again just pick rich, old white males for office” would have been a deep seated strategy of the campaign. The “old white male elitest” thing didn’t have as big of an impact once Palin was on the ticket.
I don’t care what gender or race someone is I am concerned with their values, skills, experience, etc. Granted Palin is not key in some of these areas but she has shown a tremendous ability to learn quickly and efficiently. The major media didn’t point out these differences but in the last VP debate Palin actually corrected Biden on things like the role of the VP. The prior debate she handled poorly but within the time to the next debate she met Biden square on and showed that she should not be underestimated.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

o on a retake to concerned the Biblical verse in is genesis 6 it comes from the Hebrew root nephel- an abortion- (Stem cells)
If Sarah Palin is a pumpkin I rather have Pumpkin pie everyday under Palin-mccain than eat Osama Bread under Obama

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The liberals and the liberal media are going to have a rude awakening come election night. Women are going to overwhelmingly vote for McCain Palin. Women don’t wont a socialist system in America and they sure hated the way the democrats and Osama screwed Hillary big time in the primary.

Posted by: speedy_453 | October 22, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

At this late in the race and seeing that Palins negative rating is running neck and neck with Bushs, she is a FINE to talk about who someone should have chosen as a running mate. She is dragging McCain down, McCain is dragging down other Republicans and Bush is dragging them all down…but the one thing about Bush is that he is not up for election or re-election. he can crawl back to Crawford after this. This is McCains last real attempt for the White House and he placed his hope on chosing Palin…his gambling is not paying off for him. There is no middle with Palin. You either like her or you hate her. I at least could tolerate McCain…

Posted by: GEN X | October 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Will Silly Sarah please crawl back under the rock she came from. Do she think I am fool!!! And stay out Democrat family business. You can find plenty in the Republican Party to fix, start with all the cries for you to step aside or the claims that you are “dragging the party down”. You don’t have a clue, and are a poor example of a successful woman. Have pride, and show some integrity!! That is who todays woman is, proud, strong, intellectual with integrity and steady. Oh, yea we steady!! Steadily getting tiered of your lies, manipulative and divisive tactics. You mama are no lady!!

Posted by: SD | October 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

o on a retake to concerned the Biblical verse in is genesis 6 it comes from the Hebrew root nephel- an abortion- (Stem cells)
If Sarah Palin is a pumpkin I rather have Pumpkin pie everyday under Palin-mccain than eat Osama Bread under Obama
Posted by: MOMO | Oct 22, 2008 1:21:49 PM
================
and there it says that this is the most demonic thing you can do? or do we need suri translation for that one?
THAT ONE lol!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

MOMO
o on a retake to concerned the Biblical verse in is genesis 6 it comes from the Hebrew root nephel- an abortion- (Stem cells)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What!!! You are joking right!!! I am looking this up right now.

Posted by: GEN X | October 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

The liberals and the liberal media are going to have a rude awakening come election night. Women are going to overwhelmingly vote for McCain Palin. Women don’t wont a socialist system in America and they sure hated the way the democrats and Osama screwed Hillary big time in the primary.
Posted by: speedy_453 | Oct 22, 2008 1:24:57 PM
=============
oh yes, because us women all think THE SAME. now it makes sense. You know, that should be McCain’s campaign slogan!!! THE SAME!!!
that would totally be like, super duper girly cool!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Momo,
Are you kidding? Wow…Are there any verses in there about prozac???

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

MOMOM
Hebrew word nephal which mean “to fall.” The word nephilim means “the fallen ones.”
As in the angels who had intercourse with human females and spawned giants. What does that have to with STEM CELLS or abortion?

Posted by: GEN X | October 22, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

“Posted by: GIGI | Oct 22, 2008 1:07:02 PM”
Listen, last time I checked we still had our alliances. Just scanning your list of countries, yes it looks like for the most part we’d come to thier aid and all they’d have to do is ask. Many of these democratic countries would not survive without the backing of US military power.
Remember, each country first and foremost has their own interests in mind. America should be no different. Imagine for a moment if we pulled all of our foreign aid. There would be an outcry and mayhem the likes of which we’ve never seen. Remember too, how much Reagan was hated overseas for confronting communism and the USSR.
That said, I care what other countries think only to the extent that what they think doesn’t negatively impact our economic and national security. So I guess I do give a flip afterall. :)

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

GEN X, DON’T BOTHER… as a catholic morb-influenced child, I read up on anything that would mention sex! lol! (I didn’t have a TV! all my parents gave me was books and the bible!)
and consequently, I was teased about that verse when by age 14 I was already 6′ tall loL!
nothing in there about abortion or stem research being the MOST DEMONIC thing ever…
———————-
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of God (benei ha-elohim) saw the daughters of men that they were fair, and they took them wives of all which they chose. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years. There were giants (ha-nephilim) in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God (benei ha-elohim) came unto the daughters of men, and they bore children to them, the same became mighty men (ha-gibborim) which were of old, men of renown.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

This just days after McCain lynched liberal feminist.

Posted by: BrooklynGirl | October 22, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I’m really mad that Hillary is supporting Obama since she herself brought issues regarding his character earlier in the year. At least Sarah is real – she may talk funny but at least it’s from the heart. Equality for all – go Palin…

Posted by: janey | October 22, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Why does she even care?

Posted by: LongT | October 22, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“Posted by: GIGI | Oct 22, 2008 1:07:02 PM”
Listen, last time I checked we still had our alliances. Just scanning your list of countries, yes it looks like for the most part we’d come to thier aid and all they’d have to do is ask. Many of these democratic countries would not survive without the backing of US military power.
Remember, each country first and foremost has their own interests in mind. America should be no different. Imagine for a moment if we pulled all of our foreign aid. There would be an outcry and mayhem the likes of which we’ve never seen. Remember too, how much Reagan was hated overseas for confronting communism and the USSR.
That said, I care what other countries think only to the extent that what they think doesn’t negatively impact our economic and national security. So I guess I do give a flip afterall. :)
Posted by: Cliff | Oct 22, 2008 1:30:44 PM
===================
and that way of thinking right there is why we should not allow NOT ONE MORE republican to open their mouths in front of a foreign leader.
Without the alliance in IRAk NOW WAY NO HOW we’d be able to still have a President and Vice President, they’d both be in jail.
BUT I LOVE LOVE LOVE the hypocrisy, because they SLAM Zapatero, they boicott the french (fries!!!LOL) they spit on NATO… without needing them???
what do we suffer from country split-personality?
THE UNITED STATES IS BOTTOM THREE IN THE LIST OF COUNTRIES TO REACH THEIR MILLENIUM GOAL AS SET BY THE UN. And we want to elect someone who thinks we should not even be in that list of countries!
GOOD LORD, you talk about being prepotent, and how Obama thinks he’s the shizzle… but you sure sound shiny yourself.
oh and that’s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, last time I checked, America is a continent.

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Palin wants to take away your right to choose, prevent education that would reduce unwanted pregnancy and dilute our children’s education by even insinuating that creationism is a scientific theory. That’s not equality for all. That’s hard-core right-wing ideology.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Posted by: nevermind | October 22, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

At the end of the day, after the campaigning…Hillary and Obama would have come back together because the difference between them is like COKE and PEPSI…to small to calculate. Any person who says they were voting for Hillary and are now voting for McCain, I wonder…because Hillary and McCain have nothing in common. What would sraw them to McCain.

Posted by: Francheska | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Who Can Make The Big Changes In Washington?
I believe that McCain-Palin with the rest of our ticket for reform best represents our best hope for America and are ready to serve our country. With your help and support, we can make this happen on November 4th. Stand with us now and join our team. We need your support, James Everitt
I’m for lower taxes and smaller government, because lower taxes are better for families, property owners, and small businesses. With lower taxes, businesses have more money to invest, hire, and provide services. Less government bureaucracy improves the business climate, promotes economic growth, and reduces unemployment.
And if we limit the scope of the federal government in accordance with the constitution, we decrease spending and reducing taxes, increasing our liberty in several ways:
(1) Liberty is increased when government is reduced to its essential and necessary functions, because there is no longer a role for lobbyists fighting to increase pork for their favorite non-essential, unnecessary programs.
(2) Liberty is increased when more government functions and decisions are handled at the state and local levels, closer to the American people.
(3) Liberty is increased when individual citizens have more responsibility and when government has less control.
(4) Limited government leads to lower taxes, and with lower taxes, liberty is increased because businesses have more of their own money to invest, hire, and provide services. Less government bureaucracy improves the business climate and promotes job growth.
(5) Limited government leads to lower taxes, which is better for families and property owners. With lower taxes, liberty is increased because individuals and families have more of their own money – increased take-home pay – for their needs: food, clothing, housing, education, health insurance, and retirement.
(6) When people are able to provide for themselves, they are more likely to achieve prosperity and less dependent on government programs. In turn, this leads to further reduction in government spending, allowing the remaining money to be targeted to legitimate needs, such as military veterans, orphans, and people with severe disabilities.
Join the Chamber as we work on key issues facing America — assessing our country’s strengths and weaknesses and outlining the public policies we must pursue to succeed in the world economy. Explore our Web site to learn more about critical issues and get involved by adding your name to our petitions.
Sign A Petition:
Card Check Petition
State of American Business Petition
Economic and Tax Policy Petition
Energy and Environment Petition
Health Care Petition
Labor Petition
Legal Reform Petition
Thanks,
James Everitt
P. S. Just take a couple of minutes to view our ads and I’m certain that you will understand the importance and the urgency of our message.

Posted by: James Everitt | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

is the Baracomania or Obamarama done

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Obama didn’t pick Hillary because of Bill? Nice try. He had no problem going up to Bill’s office to ask for his support. He didn’t pick her because he felt threatened by a woman who kicked his ass. Acorn was hired and helped Obama beat Hillary…women cheated again and again…

Posted by: nobamabotshere | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

she’s a real what?
I’m real hungry right now… that makes me vp or president material?
we’re talking about bridge-to-nowhere, abused-her-powers, sold a plane-on-ebay claiming PALIN!

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

“I’m really mad that Hillary is supporting Obama…”
_____________________
Don’t be mad or surprised. Hillary is first and foremost a Democrat. Whatever she said during the primaries to challenge Obama is now ancient history. If she wants to continue her career in Democratic politics, she’s has to support Obama. Period.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Check out Clinton’s economic record, James, and compare it with the administrations directly before and after. Then we’ll talk.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

MOMO
We will be done Nov 4 when Obama wins. ;-)You still have to explain that bible verse. ;-)

Posted by: GEN X | October 22, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Gen X,
Or if McCain/Palin wins, you can learn about it in science class.
:)

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Oy, I’m getting snarky. I retract my last post.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Monom- Nephel actually means that which has been aborted or cast aside see your strongs for that- anyway
A stemcell was actually used inthe creation of what we collectively called Nephilim. As it is called- A counterfeit being

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

rrow,
Do you know that Palin said Hillary was whining during the Democratic primary?

Posted by: tony | October 22, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

“Don’t be mad or surprised. Hillary is first and foremost a Democrat.”
What about integrity? If she really believes what she said then there is no excuse for this. Americans deserve an honest person as president regardless of party. John McCain is solid but Obama is not (slippery trial lawyer).

Posted by: maryyy | October 22, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

On a different topic, but related. Palin filed reimbursement on her children’s trips to all kinds of events, including dad’s sports events. She would be fired if a regular state employee. I work in California, we have state employees fired for using government credit card to fill personal car gasoline for $600. This is abusing system, this is cheating – no different from shoplifting.
Do you really want her to be your president?

Posted by: leighg1 | October 22, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

It’s always the same thing with rabid democrats. When the conversation turns against Obama it’s time to change the subject – just like the ugly media…nasty way to live and it’s going to get worse…

Posted by: roberto13 | October 22, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Obama is the new Teflon President. Anything the republicans say does not stick!
President Obama! Get used to it!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 22, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Well the media has already made Obama president. haha- that cool though i think he so sloppy a candidate he needs their sleazy endorsements

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

I prefer honesty over flash – Go McCain!

Posted by: Janet24 | October 22, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

“oh and that’s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, last time I checked, America is a continent.”
________________
ALL CAPS and then that last zinger so you can fulfill your need to give me a geography lesson. Yeah, I see where this is going. Here I thought that a reference to “America” represents an ideal and that North America and South America were continents, so thank you for setting me straight.
“MILLENIUM GOAL”? “UN”? You’re right, that’s not real high on my list of priorities right now. That’s probably because I give to non-profit charitable organizations that do some great work for the people of Africa. However, I’m finding that the sour economy and the threat of higher tax rates will adversely impact my donations. Too bad no one is talking about incentivizing private charities and their donors to continue this work.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

And we know how honest McShame is, he couldn’t tell the truth if his campaigned relied on it…. oh wait a minute, it does rely on it. Doesn’t he look at the polls? People are tired of his lies.
Obama is the new Teflon President. Anything the republicans say does not stick!
President Obama! Get used to it!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 22, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“It’s always the same thing with rabid democrats. When the conversation turns against Obama it’s time to change the subject – just like the ugly media…nasty way to live and it’s going to get worse…
Posted by: roberto13″
Yep typical Obama/McCain exchange. Obama can’t fool all the people with his “get back to the issues” garbage.
1. Obama attacks McCain
2. McCain in return attacks Obama
3. Obama says lets stop these negative attacks and get back to the real issues
Many tools don’t recognize this exchange but many people do. So its ok for Obama to attack McCain but not vice versa right?
BTW Obama is running more negative ads then McCain but Obama is outspending 4-1 so he can still have double the negative ads and then have double the fluff ads as well.
McCains ads are some of the only ways you’ll hear about Obama negatives anyways since anytime something comes up negative about Obama the MSM writes a bunch of fluffy articles trying to spin it and redirect it at McCain. MSM has lost ALL credibility for me going forward.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

It seems a lot of people on here like to bash anyone who does not support the same candidate thy do. I support John McCain does that make me a bad person? I respect who people want to vote for I just hope everyone looks at all the facts and makes a decision based on that information. To ignore the negative is wrong. Both candidates have negatives and this includes Obama.

Posted by: batesba74 | October 22, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Obama is the new Teflon President. Anything the republicans say does not stick!
President Obama! Get used to it!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 22, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

“None are as blind as those that will not see”
If Obama is president there will be buyer’s remorse…
The media have mocked McCain’s character and it’s more than shameful – it a travesty of justice.
I guess we live in age of flash and lack of respect for people’s devotion to their country.
This country will miss McCain when he is gone but it’ll be too late.

Posted by: georgeo | October 22, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Kind of an unrelated issue but with all the bashing against republicans saying things like “un-american” I think people don’t realize the motivation behind it. I just posted this on another blog but I think it sums it up pretty well.
Many people probably don’t realize this is based on ideaology. Maybe you don’t realize the basic premises the country was founded on and that are in the constitution. Small government, low taxation, and freedom to make your own choices and also be responsible for them. The constitution promotes “life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happines.”
When you have people that openly subscribe to forms of government COMPLETELY OPPOSED to the intent of the constitution I can understand why people consider them un-american. These viewpoints say the government has the right to control over our lives including the fruits of our labors to provide “rights” such as housing, food, etc.
This is exactly the oppressive and overreaching type of government the constitution was meant to prevent. So yes I consider saying the government should decide what to do with our lives is un-american especially as designed by the founding fathers.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Batesba,
I hear what you’re saying. I agree with most of Obama’s plan and virtually all of his views. There are some things I disagree with, that I would consider negative, but overall he has the better plan.
Now when you say ‘negative’, I think you’ll find that Obama supporters are frustrated because even though the Ayers thing, the Acorn thing, the socialist thing, the birth certificate thing, the muslim thing, have all been discredited multiple times, the McCain camp continues to use these fear-based smears. That kind of campaigning much more ‘negative’ to me than the small policy differences I have from Obama.
I’m not speaking for all Obama supporters, but it’s sad to me that the conversation comes down to that.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

never seen a guy try yo buy the presidency like this Hollywood puppet Micheal Moore spin-off, fake Black presidential hopeful- Obama
he wants to change america from what to what Drawing of what? a washed up terrorist and a out of touch loud mouthed goon of a pastor.He could surround himself with as many luminaries as he likes- And the media could endorse him to Hell and Back he is just another Trickster

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“What about integrity?”
_______________________
What about it? Sadly, there’s very little of it to be found in politics.
Your McCain reference is duly noted however. His Senate record shows he has consistenly worked with both parties. This has earned him support from indies and moderates and grudging support among some conservatives.
I don’t see a similar record in Obama or Biden despite their promises to reach across party lines. I just don’t think they’ll be able to pull it off. However, they may not need to. If they win, they may be able to simply implement their agenda while steamrolling any opposition or dissent. That’s the state of nirvana the Left is hoping for and it may just happen.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Here are some Thomas Jefferson quotes to support the “un-american” post. Look at these in the context of socialism and “the right to not work and have a home, food, etc” and tell me that is what people like Jefferson intended for this country. Please keep that in mind when you hear un-american.
A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned – this is the sum of good government.”
“Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.”
“I have no fear that the result of our experiment will be that men may be trusted to govern themselves without a master. ”
“I own that I am not a friend to a very energetic government. It is always oppressive.”
“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.”
“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

have all been discredited multiple times
That’s just it they haven’t – it’s all spin and twisting by Obama with the help of the media. Wake up and don’t throw away your vote – do the research don’t be lazy…

Posted by: jonesey | October 22, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Obama can’t fool all the people with his “get back to the issues” garbage
dude… face it, this is THE SAME McCain who called Chelsea Clinton “UGLY” because “janet reno is her father”
this is THE SAME McCain you guys didn’t want four years ago
this is THE SAME
we whant THE CHANGE

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Hmm… I didn’t know Sarah Palin was in on the discussion when Obama was deliberating who to choose as his running candidate. I think Clinton was seriously considered – she had to be based on the number of votes she was able to pull in in the run for the Democratic nomination. Enough Sarah – you didn’t even know the duties of the vice-president so why would anyone believe you have insider knowledge on this one?

Posted by: Ruth | October 22, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Cryos,
What about rights to public schools? medicare? The postal system? Social Security? Unemployment? Welfare? Disability Insurance?
All of these alleged SOCIALIST programs have been in place for many years under the government’s control.
Would you eliminate them?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”
This is so obvious to some but sadly not to others…

Posted by: kimmmy | October 22, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Sarah Palin is the best VP since James Baker and I think she should run for President In 1012 or Conoleeza Rice- (the First Black president) i predict that one

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Well, Kimmy maybe you can go back to 1913 and eliminate the progressive tax program?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

“Posted by: Cryos | Oct 22, 2008 2:12:21 PM”
God, how I love Thomas Jefferson!

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

MOMO the Unhinged;
Stem cells can come from embryos… they can also be harvested from an umbilical cord after birth… they can also, if recent experiments are confirmed, be made from skin cells…
What does the Bible have against Umbilical cords and skin? I thought the Bible was pro-conception..?
More umbilical cords result from more procreation… which makes more stem cells available. So the Bible is undoubtedly pro stem-cell research.
:-)

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“Cryos,
What about rights to public schools? medicare? The postal system? Social Security? Unemployment? Welfare? Disability Insurance?
All of these alleged SOCIALIST programs have been in place for many years under the government’s control.
Would you eliminate them?
Posted by: Concerned”
So your justification is because we already provide some assistance that we can justify more? That’s what I gather from your post and is a scary assertion.
The things you mention are not “rights” by our constitution but “privileges” from the government over the years and are a good compromise. A lot of people have failed to realize the difference between rights and privileges.
The fact is I think we’ve already gone too far with things like fully refundable tax credits and tax welfare (that is Obamas big “tax cut” to add thousands of dollars more of free money).
Liberals want to add the “right” to shelter, employment, insurance, food etc and that is DEFINITELY going too far in my opinion.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Sarah Palin is the best VP since James Baker and I think she should run for President In 1012 or Conoleeza Rice- (the First Black president) i predict that one”
LOLZ at the typo; 1012, indeed. A Palin administration would be replete with Dark Ages trappings; inquisitions, burning books, demonic exorcisms etc etc

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

So, are you saying you would get rid of them or not?
If so, which ones?
If not, why?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

“What about rights to public schools? medicare? The postal system? Social Security? Unemployment? Welfare? Disability Insurance?
All of these alleged SOCIALIST programs have been in place for many years under the government’s control.”
___________________________
None of these are “rights” that Americans have. They are what they are – programs administered by the Federal government and supported by taxpayers.
And yes, the more control the federal government has over our lives, the closer we get to socialism. I don’t see how that can be disputed.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

great one,we do need to burn some books like Obama;s tax plans and we should indight Michael Moore for being a greasy bigot and lier

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

LOL Torrboy…
Tell me again about how the universe revolves around the earth…?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Let me provide a simple example of the end state of socialism that many people of high school/college age should understand if they are honest with themselves.
Scenario: You just graduated high school and are considering whether to go to college and what type of career to pursue. You have 2 choices:
1. Work a gas station job that requires no further education and no “off hours” work.
2. Work an IT job that requires at least a bachelors degree, continuous education as well as has after hours work, on call and is very mentally stressful.
Both jobs will provide you with the same quality of life. They’ll both earn you the same home, same car, and same amount of spending money. Which one will you choose?
Some people with strong work ethics or with an interest in a specific field might choose option 2 but I GUARANTEE if answering honestly the majority of people would choose option 1.
That is the impact that socialism would have on the country.. It will remove a LOT of motivation to work hard and become successful because instead you could do the minimum, have more free time for friends and family, and at the end of the day have the same quality of life as someone who works hard.
The result would be a continually declining american education, workforce, etc. The only way to combat this would be to force people to work to their potential and the minute we go there we are communist.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Obama is the new Teflon President. Anything the republicans say does not stick!
President Obama! Get used to it!

Posted by: Independent realist | October 22, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

“Posted by: Concerned | Oct 22, 2008 2:24:43 PM”
You can’t just get rid of a federal entitlement or a program w/o something else to act as a “safety net”. So, if we’re so fortunate as to have legislators gifted and talented and caring enough to consider non-government solutions to our problems, then perhaps we could gradually wean ourselves away from our dependence on government so that government can get back to that which is specifically written into our Constitution.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

While we debate Palins lipstick Russia,Iran and Qatar are forming Gas cartels. Chavesz wants subs. Iran sponsoring Airfields in the Ccaribbean hmmm

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Copy, watch, and post response in 15 minutes! You’ll understand :)
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1

Posted by: PatrickHenry | October 22, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Cliff,
I dissagree…
Just because some programs that we now have in place would be considered socialist (and I agree that all the programs I mentioned are socialist), doesn’t mean that we are a socialist nation. We have never been a purely capitalist or purely socialist nation. As I’ve said before…we fall in the middle.
But nothing Obama is proposing is any more overtly socialist than the system we already have.
Offering government sponsored healthcare might be one of your arguments but we already offer that in terms of medicare and medicaide and the government would not replace employer plans.
Eliminating tax cuts for certain tax brackets might be the other argument. But remember, he’s suggesting we roll back tax cuts for individuals above 200k or families above 250k to levels reflecting where we were before Pres Bush. And at that time, this country was economically way better off than we were before or since.
But I digress…
Which social programs already in existence would you keep or eliminate and why???

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I’m sorry…I’m STILL waiting for proof that Obama has followed in line with all these grandiose claims he’s making. Unless and until he proves something with his record, I don’t care what he says- he might as well tell me there will be $1 million dollars on my doorstep when I get home.
McCain has largely broken with the far right and 55% of his legislation is acutally sponsored with Democrats!!! Who cares what the hell your ideas are if you haven’t supported them with a record? Who cares what you bring to the table if you haven’t shown that you can work with both parties to pass legislation anyway? AND WHO CARES IF HOLLYWOOD THINKS YOU ROCK- I’m a real person in the real world with real problems and it seems to me at the end of the day – Obama has only come to serve HIMSELF. That’s the problem!
DONT BUY THE CHEAP HYPE: VOTE MCCAIN/PALIN IN ’08

Posted by: esm | October 22, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.”
Certainly – I would like freedom from torture, from being bugged, from having to pay taxes for wars that aren’t mine, have an abortion if my circumstances make it difficult for me to raise a child… It is curious how conservatives have no qualms about spending tax money on wars, on the police, on prisons, on motorways, etc., but not on healthcare, education, etc.

Posted by: Libertarian | October 22, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

And don’t forget- for all those families that Obama claims will get “tax-cuts” (actually subsidies- they aren’t tax-cuts) HE WILL ELIMINATE the current tax cuts that are in place- SO YOU WILL BE PAYING MORE. It’s a complete scam
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html

Posted by: ESM | October 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Cryos,
You clearly never got the memo that the cold war is over, and the reds aren’t hiding under your bed waiting to steal your capitalism.
I take issue and completely disagree that you would even consider that the majority of Americans would want to take the lazy way out.
Your argument is simple and devoid of any critical thought. It’s just the fear talking. Turn off Fox News.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

“Tell me again about how the universe revolves around the earth…?”
Well, Concerned, since you asked;
A loooong time ago, before America was found, even before Adam and Eve kept pet dinosaurs in their Garden, Gawd set the flat Earth on the back of an infinite stack of turtles, so that its four corners could be seen by Jeesus when he stood atop Earth’s highest peak, Mount Ararat…
Please see http://www.internetkooks.com for the rest of the story.
;-)

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

SHEOPLE! MYSELF INCLUDED!
This is an “eye-opener” why none of our arguments on this subject matter.
Please take 15 minutes TRY to understand!
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k6KUDv1wzraWhwlBt1

Posted by: Pappione | October 22, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Concerned | Oct 22, 2008 2:09:58 PM: Let me first say I agree with some of what you say. The Muslim thing to me is a non-story, the birth certificate issue is a non-story although he could set all doubters to rest by providing the original copy but I doubt he would have got this far if it was an issue. But I disagree with you on Ayres and Acorn. He has revised his stance on this over time and each time a little more of the Story comes out and he is more involved than he first stated. Do I think Obama associating with Ayres makes him a terrorist? No I do not. At worst this show bad judgment I know he was only 8 when this occurred but he still is proud of his actions and Obama should have said as long as you are still proud of this I can not associate with you. ACORN is only discredited because Obama was never a paid employee of ACORN he did however volunteer and did teach some classes to them. These issues bother me and I still am not comfortable with the whole Rev. Wright issue. But this is not what is making me vote for McCain. The reason I am not supporting Obama is because he is promising to much new Government and it takes money. Where is he getting this money? He wants to give 95% of Americans a tax cut that is great I am open to more money in my pocket as you probably are. Money is a good thing for me although my wife will just get it not me. The problem I have is 40% of Americans pay no income tax in the end and these people will be getting money for what? Obama and Biden have went so low as to attack Joe the Plumber and I find this classless. Someone had the courage to ask him a tough question and they have destroyed this man in the press! Joe never said he made 250,000 a year as Obama claims! He said He wanted to own a business that could make 250,000 a year and he felt his tax plan would punish him. I think it is wrong for a candidate to attack a citizen because they do not like the question he asked. But I disagree with Obama that raising taxes on the rich and Business will fix our economy! I think Obama will give you money back but say he gives you $1,000 in tax breaks sounds great right? But then he raises the tax on Business what are these Businesses going to do absorb the tax increase or pass it on? I think they will pass it on in the form of freezing wages cutting benefits laying off workers and increasing the price of the Goods or Services they provide. Lets face it the Salary the will freeze will not be on top level executives but ordinary Americans living paycheck to paycheck! Who buys the goods and services they provide? You and Me so if we pay for it with higher costs on goods and services did we really get a tax cut at all. And the last reason I appose Obama is because he wants to Double the Capital Gaines Tax. That has never been good for the Economy in good times let alone the Economic crisis we are in today. Saying all that can I ask you a question? Do you place any blame on the The Democrats for Freddie and Fannie?

Posted by: batesba74 | October 22, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

As for Biden and Scranton whayt hsappen to inner city pverty .LA california My god America what happens to IMmigration, to The 100,000 women killed in the deserts sands. Talk about Rwanda when there is mass murder right on our doorsteps

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

LOL @ Torrboy
You’re my hero. lol.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

the bis (homogenous) left haha want to dictate policy for the stable right- they want to make Sarah Palin out as a pook- We know their evil intentions and we are above this weakness.
Obama is on the Hollywood Express to and Jesse Jackson knew it and wanted to you knowwhat! haha

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Hey Gwen; you think Palin is “fake”? If that’s the case then I cannot even find a word to describe what Obama is but I know it’s not “genuine”. Sarah Palin speaks the truth and she does so from the heart. Thank God their are still women out there who can decipher the difference.

Posted by: Cindy | October 22, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Palin is The Truest and most compeling individual of this elections. She is the most human and the most inspiring by far.

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov
Search video from 1985.
Pass it on if you are not a “useful idiot”. You’ll understand that term after hearing him speak.

Posted by: Pappione | October 22, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

John McCain how can I get my donation money back that I contributed to you. I did not contribute money for Sarah Palin and her families wardrobe. I would like a refund.

Posted by: nevermind | October 22, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Our boy is an officer in the Marine Corp. Third time in Iraq! Sarah’s boy is over there, too. Our boy said to vote for McCain and never ever vote for Obama. He is not who people think he is and to be scared very scared!!! Wake up America!!

Posted by: Fae | October 22, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The first presidential election year that Gov. Palin was old enough to vote was in 1984.
Did Sarah Palin vote for Ferraro?
In 1984, Geraldine Ferraro was picked to run as Vice President of the United States on the DEMOCRATIC Party ticket, with former Vice President Walter Mondale as the candidate for President.

Posted by: Elana | October 22, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

“Posted by: Concerned | Oct 22, 2008 2:33:46 PM”
First, I’ll tackle your Obama references. I’m looking at what he’s done, his resume, so-to-speak. I take everything candidates say with a very large grain of salt. You want to be the leader of my country? You damn well better have an impressive resume of accomplishments. Period.
What programs would I keep or eliminate? Well, I think public schools are worth supporting but I also believe in school choice and vouchers for low income families.
Social Security? Keep it but add an optional free market component to it. Give folks an opportunity to earn a little ROI.
Postal Service? Phase it out and let private enterprise take it.
Medicare? As with SS, I think I’d add a free market component to this as well.
Disability Insurance? Phase it out and let the insurance industry compete for the biz.
Like I’ve said, these programs are not “rights” granted under our Constitution and you can’t just eliminate them outright. You carefully and thoughtfully phase them out as other alternatives are introduced so that no one who is in need falls through the cracks.
And remember, Americans are the most charitable people in the world. There are so many excellent charities and non-profits out there. Imagine if we stimulated a culture in which these organizations could flourish. That prospect excites me waaay more than the government trying to take care of everyone.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Batesba,
I hear what you’re saying.
I don’t think he taught classes for Acorn, he attended some training sessions to encourage people to vote.
Regarding the Rev. Wright thing; like you, I had a concern about that at first. I urge you to read or watch Obama’s speech called “A More Perfect Union.” It’s kind of long, but a very good read, and it put to rest any question I had about the Rev. Wright thing. In fact, it was actually quite inspiring.
Regarding tax cuts for non workers…that’s not what he means. Remember that there are those people who make so little they are not charged INCOME tax. BUT they pay social security and payroll taxes, etc. They are still contributing to the system. People who aren’t paying taxes won’t get a tax refund.
Regarding taxes on business…if you own a business and make a net profit (NET- after payroll, expenses, etc), you will get charged 3% more ONLY on the money over and above 200k.- again…close to what we had in 2000.
I’m not sure about the capital gains tax thing…let me look into it and get back to ya! :)

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

“Who cares what the hell your ideas are if you haven’t supported them with a record? Who cares what you bring to the table if you haven’t shown that you can work with both parties to pass legislation anyway? AND WHO CARES IF HOLLYWOOD THINKS YOU ROCK- I’m a real person in the real world with real problems and it seems to me at the end of the day – Obama has only come to serve HIMSELF. That’s the problem!”
My thoughts exactly. The Clinton and Bush presidencies should have taught us regardless of political viewpoints not to trust what politicans say look at what they do.
Yet this cycle people are saying to “trust” “change you can believe in.” Furthermore they are saying to ignore the contradictions between Obama’s voting record and bill sponsorships and to ignore his associations.
If a politician does not have a long standing record the logical way of deciding their viability is to just their character and judgement a large part of which is associations.
Obama supporters are saying Obama should not be judged on anything other than his promises which the more experienced of us know is naive and we have the last 2 presidencies to prove it.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

jwench;
And isn’t it ironic how the left constantly accuse the right of being vicious, mean spirited, hate mongers with no sense of tolerance? Selective application.

Posted by: Cindy | October 22, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Sarah Palin wants to give women all this freedom but at the same time wants to take away our freedom to decide what to do with our bodies. Hypocricy!

Posted by: Thanks but No Thanks | October 22, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

“Cryos,
You clearly never got the memo that the cold war is over, and the reds aren’t hiding under your bed waiting to steal your capitalism.
I take issue and completely disagree that you would even consider that the majority of Americans would want to take the lazy way out.
Your argument is simple and devoid of any critical thought. It’s just the fear talking. Turn off Fox News.
Posted by: Concerned”
Nice partisan knee jerk response to a VERY valid scenario (in my opinion).
You know thats funny in China alone there are 1.2 billion communists. You think that Russia, China, North Korea, etc aren’t working to try to undermine our capitalist republic? I hope you are not that naive.
I can tell you this there is a small chance I would work as hard and stressful of a job as I do if it had no personal benefit. I don’t think I”m alone in this and I think you are denying what you know is the truth.
If you want to blind yourself from reality to “believe” that is your choice but at least try to be honest.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

“Sarah Palin wants to give women all this freedom but at the same time wants to take away our freedom to decide what to do with our bodies. Hypocricy!
Posted by: Thanks but No Thanks”
I’m pro-life personally but pro-choice politically since wedge issues like that detract from an overall perspective of candidates and I don’t feel strongly enough about abortion to project my personal beliefs.
On the flip side of your argument conservatives are “fighting to protect the helpless” and “defending human rights issues” if you want to put it in that light.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

MOMO:”the bis (homogenous) left haha want to dictate policy for the stable right- they want to make Sarah Palin out as a pook- We know their evil intentions and we are above this weakness.”
Maybe, but i think poor Sarah needs another exorcism before Election Day, just to be safe… Palin may be the “most human” in this election, but that’s apparently only after they got that pesky demon out of her.
I can see the new GOP platform now; “Let’s clean up Washington!!! Mandatory Weekly Exorcisms for all public servants!!!”

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Sarah Palin Wants to Protect Kids, not kill them, She has a Moral Charter to be against Abortion.If you dont want Kids you know what to do

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.”
Certainly – I would like freedom from torture, from being bugged, from having to pay taxes for wars that aren’t mine, have an abortion if my circumstances make it difficult for me to raise a child… It is curious how conservatives have no qualms about spending tax money on wars, on the police, on prisons, on motorways, etc., but not on healthcare, education, etc.
Posted by: Libertarian”
So you cherry picked one quote from many. Would you like to discuss others in relation to socialism? And by the way if you are liberatarian you would be opposed to the healthcare and education issues just like national security and police. Any true liberatarian is far from socialist.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

It eats at the core of these Lefties that someone could be so right without being from the Right So conservative but so Natural,
Thats why they cant stop writing about her- My Joan Of Arc- I’m willing to follow her flag> if america would dare her lead

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Posting this scenario one more time for people glorifying socialism because Obama believes in it. Take this scenario and apply it to a whole country. If productivity and the economy goes into the gutter indefinitely ALL of us are a lot worse off then we are now.
Let me provide a simple example of the end state of socialism that many people of high school/college age should understand if they are honest with themselves.
Scenario: You just graduated high school and are considering whether to go to college and what type of career to pursue. You have 2 choices:
1. Work a gas station job that requires no further education and no “off hours” work.
2. Work an IT job that requires at least a bachelors degree, continuous education as well as has after hours work, on call and is very mentally stressful.
Both jobs will provide you with the same quality of life. They’ll both earn you the same home, same car, and same amount of spending money. Which one will you choose?
Some people with strong work ethics or with an interest in a specific field might choose option 2 but I GUARANTEE if answering honestly the majority of people would choose option 1.
That is the impact that socialism would have on the country.. It will remove a LOT of motivation to work hard and become successful because instead you could do the minimum, have more free time for friends and family, and at the end of the day have the same quality of life as someone who works hard.
The result would be a continually declining american education, workforce, etc. The only way to combat this would be to force people to work to their potential and the minute we go there we are communist.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“Obama supporters are saying Obama should not be judged on anything other than his promises which the more experienced of us know is naive and we have the last 2 presidencies to prove it.”
__________________
I remember the first time I voted and Jimmy Carter beat him. I remember the last time liberals were in charge of all branches of government.
Young people, listen up! Things are pretty bad right now, right? Trust me on this one. We could be on the cusp of repeating the same failed policies of Jimmy Carter.
In fact, I’m already planning on it unfortunately. I’ve cut way back on discretionary spending. I’ve drastically reduced my charitable contributions. And, I’ve stopped paying into my 401k. And horror of all horrors, after 10 years of raising our five children, my wife is looking for a job. :(
But enough about my problems… :)

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

“I can see the new GOP platform now; “Let’s clean up Washington!!! Mandatory Weekly Exorcisms for all public servants!!!”"
I haven’t checked into this to see if the accusations are viable, but even so I’d prefer someone who wants to exorcise demons within themselves rather than listen to demons preaching racial hatred for 20 years.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

MOMO you clearly have problems, have you ever thought of seeking psychological help? or does sarah palin and the bible have something against that too?
i hate it when people are too close minded to see both sides of the coin. yeah if you don’t want kids the IDEAL situation would be to not have sex, but it happens, mistakes happen. i think the world would be a better place if MORE people chose to have abortions. i am sick of my tax dollars going to pay for crack babies and welfare mommas that just have more babies to get bigger welfare checks. i got pregnant when i was not ready to be a mother and i chose to end the pregnancy, and i would make that choice again and again. people choose life, but do they consider the quality of life for that child? i wish more people would consider that before they decide to start popping them out.

Posted by: sickofthiscrap | October 22, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Cliff,
Thanks for your answer. I may not agree with you, but you’re the FIRST person to answer me- and I’ve asked the question a LOT.
There’s a couple issues I’d ask you to consider. I get concerned when I hear about privatizing medicare- I’m just not sure the elderly can navigate such a system, and I think it leaves them vulnerable to unscrupulous individuals. How would you address that?
I realize that these programs are not rights. But you say you’d keep public education and I think that everybody would support some type of public schooling because it’s better for our society. Not only in terms of future success, but it contributes to the economy and the health and happiness of our citizens. And that’s the kind of country I want to live in. I don’t have kids, but I have no problem paying real estate taxes (and in NYC they’re HIGH) which are used in my neighborhood schools. I also don’t mind funding programs that make sure the elderly couple next door has heat in the winter and can get their medication. I also don’t mind that, in hard times like these, my cousin got unemployment for a few months after getting laid off from the utility company she’s worked for these past 12 years (I’ve been there- it sucks). I don’t mind if some of my taxes goes to libraries and parks and all these other programs that make America the culture it is.
Now, after all the peace and love, let me tell you what I don’t want.
I don’t want to bail people out of mortgages they never should have taken. I don’t want young women to have children to abuse the welfare system. I don’t want any one who benefits from these programs to think there is a bottomless well out there for them.
But here’s what I REALLY don’t want. I don’t want a good presidential candidate demonized as a socialist unfairly. He’s not doing anything radical. And if he does bolster this country and get the economy back to where we were in 2000 every one will be better off.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

“In fact, I’m already planning on it unfortunately. I’ve cut way back on discretionary spending. I’ve drastically reduced my charitable contributions. And, I’ve stopped paying into my 401k. And horror of all horrors, after 10 years of raising our five children, my wife is looking for a job. :(”
I’m there with ya. Good posts btw by you, momo and others on this thread its refreshing to see.
If Obama is elected president an unfortunate side effect we’ll see is that charity time and donations will drop through the floor I bet as people are forced to save from what they know will be gouges to their cost of living.
Despite liberals like Obama’s claim that “I could afford to give more” republicans give much more to charity on all income levels than democrats.
Also funny how people like Biden don’t give to charity and give only the minimum to the government. If they feel its “patriotic” couldn’t he be giving extra money to the government first to show his dedication? It appears its another “do as i say not as I do” scenario.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

@Cryos,
Search for “Palin exorcism video” in any search engine… video links get flagged as spam by this site, else I’d link you directly, sorry.

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

“I don’t want to bail people out of mortgages they never should have taken. I don’t want young women to have children to abuse the welfare system. I don’t want any one who benefits from these programs to think there is a bottomless well out there for them.
But here’s what I REALLY don’t want. I don’t want a good presidential candidate demonized as a socialist unfairly. He’s not doing anything radical. And if he does bolster this country and get the economy back to where we were in 2000 every one will be better off.”
I understand your viewpoints however when we talk about the “2000 economy” remember this is when dotcoms and tech stocks started crashing. That bubble is what sustained the “good economy.” and the economy was dropping through the floor as Clinton was leaving office.
The economy was good up to this year but due to the growing housing bubble it also crashed even harder than in 2000-2001. In a few years people could say they want the economy of 2007 and if you ignored the ensuing chaos they wouldn’t be off the mark either.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“Now, after all the peace and love, let me tell you what I don’t want.”
Your turn to be my hero, Concerned… great post.

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I see the desperation of Obama Ticket. Are They trying to Buy the presidency. hmmm. I really think so. They want to make Obama the President before the vote- typical Hollywood- Obama the hero- McCain the Crook- Are you buying that!. I am not- He’s 10 pionts ahead don’t be delusional this election willbe decided by ballot not by polls

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Cryos,
I will again respond to your scenario: given the choice, people want to make a contribution and to work hard and get ahead. The majority of people are not relying on cushy jobs.
You’re grasping at straws. Show me a study or some statistic to back up your claim.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Concerned, the “joe the plumber” off the cuff remark and I think an unplanned reply to Gibson regarding capital gains taxes to me solidified “socialist” type leanings I was highly suspicious of. Among other “warning signs” I interpreted were:
1. He has voted for tax increases across the board from his voting records
2. Many of his mentors are marxist, socialist and communist. Unless you agree at least to a degree with their ideals I wouldn’t think you would consider them your mentors.
3. He has changed his tune many times. Against Hillary the cap was $70K but he upped it to $250K for the general election.
Here is the snippet from the Gibson interview. My interpretation was that regardless of evidence that shows lower capital gains is good for government revenue and the economy Obama would still want to raise it for “fairness.” This says to me that he puts “fairness” above economic sense which scares me in more ways than 1.
GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.
OBAMA: Right.
GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.
So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

The more I think about it, John McCain isn’t a natural when it comes to running campaigns. The reason: He’s just an honest person who truly wants to serve the public. He doesn’t need “President” on his resume, he already has 20+ years in the military (including 17 military awards and decorations), 20+ years in the Senate where he’s sponsored NUMEROUS bills on issues from Indian Affairs to Fuel Efficiency to Immigration to Veterans Affairs to public safety, national defense, etc! Shame on anyone to write him off for his age or looks- maybe he should apologize for the many times he put his life in danger just so you have the right to make those stupid remarks. I’m so ashamed when people do that. SHAME on anyone who assumes he’s just another old guy running for office- he’s HAS been a maverick and showed that he IS TOUGH. And people think he’s ANGRY? Maybe that’s what we need!! Maybe we need someone who is angry with the way things are going!! I want a person who will FIGHT and WORK, not for his own glory, but for our country.
Now we have problems with Obama possibly delaying the legal verification of his birth certificate! WHAT DOES THIS MAN KEEP HIDING? And NO, he hasn’t really answered for his affiliations with Wright, Ayers, Reznic, Frannie and Freddie, ACORN etc. This is getting to be ridiculous. I , as many citizens, are really getting tired of this song and dance routine.

Posted by: ESM | October 22, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Its strange in a election that Chavez could win if he was the Democratic Candidate
infact Chavez came to office by similar topics as Obama on a populist platform
This Populist crap is the closest thing to Fascism in the West

Posted by: MOMO | October 22, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Cryos,
Among my mentors are athiests, republicans, catholics, farmers, foreigners, domestics….a well-rounded person learns from differences as well as similarities.
He has NOT voted for raising taxes across the board. You are ill-informed.
I’m still not sure about the capital gains thing….the last I heard him say was that he would eliminate capital gains up to 15k during this economic crisis so that people would have access to assets if they needed them.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Torrboy,
We should go vote together, what are you doing novermber 4th? lol

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

“Cryos,
I will again respond to your scenario: given the choice, people want to make a contribution and to work hard and get ahead. The majority of people are not relying on cushy jobs.
You’re grasping at straws. Show me a study or some statistic to back up your claim.
Posted by: Concerned”
I would say looking at posts and people’s reactions to “taxing the rich” and their “rights” I think are evidence alone in favor of my judgement of the scenario.
I would like to agree with your assessment but I can’t. The problem also is that working hard wouldn’t get you ahead hence the loss of motivation.
The optimistic side of me believes as you do but then I look at what people do when given a choice, the things people demand, the state of many countries in the world, etc and it is hard for me to agree.
The path of least resistance is taken most often if there is no personal incentive to make another choice. I see it as an unfortunate reality.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

“Posted by: Concerned | Oct 22, 2008 3:22:25 PM”
______________
Perhaps the reason I’m the first person to respond is because others of like-mind often see this line of questioning as a potential trap meant to demonstrate a person’s lack of concern for their fellow man.
Medicare – still government sponsored but with a free market component. Companies that compete for this biz must make it user-friendly and affordable. Unscrupulous individuals or companies would be prosecuted under the law and forced to compensate their victims. Who protects us from an unscrupulous government…?
We want the same things – a fair and just society in which people are cared for. We just need to have creative and courageous leadership that considers out-of-the-box solutions that minimize the size and scope of our federal government.
The massive bailout bill, which both Obama and McCain wrongly supported, was a bad idea and is a textbook case of how government helped create the crisis, blew it off until it blew up, then compounded the problem by throwing billions of dollars to prop up the financial markets.
Obama is not the change we need. The change we need isn’t even on the ballot this time around. So, the next four years are going to suck either way, but perhaps less so under McCain who has demonstrated with his votes, a willingness to cut government waste and keep taxes low.
Sorry, I know I sound pessimistic but as you may have read above, I’m old enough and have been to this place before.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Cryos,
Perhaps you see it that way because that’s what’s salient to you? The people who are doing what they’re supposed to be doing- getting an education and working hard- just fade into the background while the few who abuse the system are so out-and-proud, acting all entitled to a free slice of pie…(see? I’m not ALL that liberal ;) )

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

As I read these comments, I am struck by the uniformity of the commentors. All liberals?
Ladies, get a life. Think for yourselves. Quit repeating everything you hear.

Posted by: JW | October 22, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I posted Obama’s views regarding capital gains. That to me is even worse than his statement with Joe.
I agree with your statement regarding influences and being well balanced. I know and converse with people from all spectrums of politics, religion, etc because often things that challenge your views result in better learning experiences.
However judging even by his own books Obama doesn’t appear to have that type of diversity in his mentors and socialism/marxism are a unifying thread in the people he admired most.
On a seperate issue, in the campaign Obama called out McCain and Palin on “transparency” but why hasn’t he released things like his Occidental and Columbia University records? He just seems to use a lot of double standards and depends on the media to only raise one side of the story.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

“Posted by: ESM | Oct 22, 2008 3:37:58 PM”
I’m not a McCain fan, however very well said.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

What was said was direct and pointed. You may disagree with her but at least you have something to disagree with.
What is offered by Obama, change ? What change ?
Get out of Iraq and move into Afghanistan and Pakistan ?
Offer more government intervention which caused the banking problems in the first place ?
Obama and McCain .. it is hard to tell which one is young and which one is old.
It is time to make a difference vote the bloodsuckers out, vote out the democrats and the republicans. Vote third party and independent vote for something don’t vote for the lesser of 2 evils because all you will get is evil.
In 2000, people voted against the Democrats and they got Bush for eight years. Democrats and Republican are the problem and picking on Palin’s character won’t get you any where unless you listen to the third parties and fight to get them into the debates.
The third parties represent a voice that needs to be heard. If Obama or McCain fails to hear the voice of the Naders, Barr, Ron Pauls and McKinney then let the democrats and republicans lose votes because of it.
“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” — John Quincy Adams

Posted by: sms | October 22, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“Cryos,
Perhaps you see it that way because that’s what’s salient to you? The people who are doing what they’re supposed to be doing- getting an education and working hard- just fade into the background while the few who abuse the system are so out-and-proud, acting all entitled to a free slice of pie…(see? I’m not ALL that liberal ;) )
Posted by: Concerned”
I am very aware of all sides of the issue and understand very basic concepts like visibility does not equal prevalence.
I could very easily argue the more “liberal” side of things and honestly it would be an easier argument with less liability and difficulty. However I don’t believe it so I must work harder to discuss my real viewpoints.
40% of people that do not pay taxes is not “the few” especially when it would rise to 50% under Obama’s tax plan.
The current situation cannot be used as a template to judge more socialist viewpoints. Right now there is still personal incentive to work hard since you will be rewarded so “the majority who get educated and work hard” using the current situation is bad criteria.
I’d like to hear your thoughts regarding Obama’s capital gains tax statement.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Cryos,
I’m glad we’re finding common ground!
I think Obama has a highly diverse background; culturally, racially, and if you take a look at his Illinois senate record I think you’d be more than satisfied that he’s worked with democrats and republicans on some tough issues.
Regarding his transcripts…I hadn’t heard that he blocked his records but, do you really need to see them? The guy graduated Magna cum Laude from Harvard Law for god’s sake…it’s likely he passed a good portion of his undergrad coursework.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

ok, fine he didn’t pick her. you need to pick someone you can work with closely for the rest of your adminstration. and quite frankly I understand.
but what i don’t understand is how a “woman” who charged rape victims for their test kit can even have the audacity to take about feminism. what a joke. i’m tired of this overdrawn process, ready to salut President Obama. T-12 and good riddance. back to Wasilla.

Posted by: voter in PA | October 22, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

My guess would be, this argument is working with the PUMAS’. The libs are losing this arguement. I sense panic from the left.

Posted by: KansasGirl | October 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

“Obama is not the change we need. The change we need isn’t even on the ballot this time around. So, the next four years are going to suck either way, but perhaps less so under McCain who has demonstrated with his votes, a willingness to cut government waste and keep taxes low.”
Agree on this statement. I don’t even like McCain that much but I see him as the “lesser of two evils.” Unfortunately both major parties and candidates have proven themselves greedy, corrupt and incompetent in many respects.
As stated earlier in the thread once you create more government dependency programs they are hard to get rid of. Obama would pass a lot of policies such as his tax policy that would be nearly irreversable.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

As an addition to my last post, what Governor Palin could explain is that out of all the other very well qualified Republican females in politics, and trust me, there are many, why did he pick her? Popular governon in america? i think not, haven’t heard of her but i’ve heard of Schwartz. Reform minded? please. laughable. take on government? troopergate. what is it then? please explain this to me cause it appears as though old man panicked and picked the first name on the Republican rollerdex with a vagina. I am a female , and i feel insulted.

Posted by: Voter in PA | October 22, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

“I’d like to hear your thoughts regarding Obama’s capital gains tax statement.”
While we wait, here’s mine. Economists agree, you do not raise capital gains taxes if your goal is to increase tax revenues. Why? It’s called the “tipping point”. In a down market, there’s going to be very little CG tax collected. In a bull market, the lower the CG tax, the more people invest. The more people invest and gain, the more CG tax revenue the government takes in. Go too low with the rate, and not enough tax is collected. Go too high, and people will find other places to invest their money.
Free market advocates say we should eliminate CG taxes altogether. They argue that doing so will fuel business, thereby creating jobs and pumping money into the economy which is then collected by government in the form of sales and income taxes.
No matter how you slice this one, Obama’s plan to raise CG tax rates flies directly in the face of economic stimulus. To him, it’s a matter of “fairness”, whatever that means.

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Sara Palin has more executive experience in her little finger than Obama has in his whole anorexic resume!
Obama is a camouflaged misogynist whose hatred and dislike of women was so obvious to us all in his treatment of Hillary Clinton. His rapper Jay C act on stage in N.C. day after his pathetic PA. ABC debate showed us his huge disrespect when he used his midfinger to “scratch” his cheek awaiting for his audience to ‘clue in’ his dumb juvenile “flip-off” joke and hten he dusted his shoulder and “scraped” Hillary off his shoes.
Obama, you sir, are a sexist piggie and you can’t fool us.

Posted by: mary | October 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

“Posted by: Voter in PA | Oct 22, 2008 4:08:58 PM”
I feel like I’m reading the “Vagina Monologues” today… :)

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“Regarding his transcripts…I hadn’t heard that he blocked his records but, do you really need to see them? The guy graduated Magna cum Laude from Harvard Law for god’s sake…it’s likely he passed a good portion of his undergrad coursework.
Posted by: Concerned”
THe issue for me is not the records, grades, thesis, etc but a pattern of character and judgement. Both Obama and the media seem to play off each other for issues like this.
It seems that Obama criticizes others on issues where he actually has more liability but has the “do as I say not as I do I am not held to my own standards” attitude. The records combined with many other issues where he seems to duck the questions and deflect and then uses the media’s lack of impartial reporting and investigation to back him up. This pattern to me makes me even more suspicious of trusting what he says.
McCain has a MUCH more bipartisan record even if you limit the timeframe. Do a search on “washington times mccain bipartisanship” and regardless of spin the September 15th article examines voting records and bill sponsorship and finds McCain much more bipartisan.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

“Regarding his transcripts…I hadn’t heard that he blocked his records but, do you really need to see them? The guy graduated Magna cum Laude from Harvard Law for god’s sake…it’s likely he passed a good portion of his undergrad coursework.
Posted by: Concerned”
THe issue for me is not the records, grades, thesis, etc but a pattern of character and judgement. Both Obama and the media seem to play off each other for issues like this.
It seems that Obama criticizes others on issues where he actually has more liability but has the “do as I say not as I do I am not held to my own standards” attitude. The records combined with many other issues where he seems to duck the questions and deflect and then uses the media’s lack of impartial reporting and investigation to back him up. This pattern to me makes me even more suspicious of trusting what he says.
McCain has a MUCH more bipartisan record even if you limit the timeframe. Do a search on “washington times mccain bipartisanship” and regardless of spin the September 15th article examines voting records and bill sponsorship and finds McCain much more bipartisan.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Oh! Sorry Cliff, is that for me? :)
He wants to raise capital gains from 15 to 20% for people making over 250k per year.
Analysts say this is 1/3 lower than the rate set by Reagan.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Obama doesn’t care about women’s issues. Why should he?
He hasn’t given a damm about his white grandma and his only pics with her are 25 years old! His treatment of women is patronizing and dismissive. He is a petulant, foolish, inexperienced and self-absorbed, overly ambitious (for his lack of gravitas and know-how) 40-something who’ll sing and dance his way to the top! Much like these dumb blonde stereotypes who sleep their way to the top! He’s just lying his way to the top job! What a joke. And McCave is no better, of course! So, we have Obamabi attacking yet another woman, this time Gov. Sara Palin and has his team of thugs use sexist slogan on their T-shirts to “punch Sara” out! Obama’s just a scared sh*tless little guy with identity insecurities. He needs a shrink more than a ticket to the White House.
BO is using his presidnetial run as a route to self-discovery. He’s a hell of a confused puppy…but do we have to suffer his fat ego!?

Posted by: pat | October 22, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Mary, i don’t even know where to begin to address your stupidity.
The nominee has every right, and it is his sole decision to pick whomever he wants to be vice president. he does not owe hillary a single thing. thats done.
second, i am quite amazed at how you overlook the candidate who is anti family values and has demonstrated in his life, his selfish, openly misogynist ways, say the cheating with his first wife, the mistress who became the second wife, “trollop, c***” , your candidate, not mine. and yet, you seem to point that just because he did not pick hillary he is misogynist ? please.
One house, one spouse. i cannot even begin to tell you the love i feel just seeing Mr. and Mrs. Obama together and with their family. what that portrays for a nation that so values family.
you Mary, stand corrected.
cheers all.

Posted by: Voter in PA | October 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

THANK YOU, SARA PALIN, FOR EXPOSING THE MASK OF OBAMA’S SEXISM AND WOMAN-HATRED!

Posted by: memi | October 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Concerned would you care to address the capital gains issue? Perhaps you are researching it, busy with other things, etc so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt however you are showing signs of an Obama blogger by ignoring the elephant in the room you mentioned you’d “like to look into.”

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

“Oh! Sorry Cliff, is that for me? :)
He wants to raise capital gains from 15 to 20% for people making over 250k per year.
Analysts say this is 1/3 lower than the rate set by Reagan
Posted by: Concerned”
Sigh done wasting time debating with an Obama blogger. Oh well hopefully some people learned things from the exchange. I get tired of all the deflection used to fill up the blog with rhetoric.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“He wants to raise capital gains from 15 to 20% for people making over 250k per year.”
First, raising it even a single point is pointless and counterproductive. Second, color me skeptical that Obama would stop at a 20% rate and $250k/yr. I’ve just never known a liberal democrat to do such a thing.
Just speaking from experience…

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I have many close friends who were Hillary supporters and are now for McCain. Because of his age, they see McCain as a one-term president and are hoping for Hiilary in 2012. They know that can’t happen if Obama wins. This view is especially prevalent in my own local Mexican-American community.
The idea of Hillary Clinton vs Sarah Palin in 2012 is even more exciting. This will break the glass ceiling forever. Although I was for McCain from the beginning, I respect and applaud this reasoning and share that hope.
Also, as a pro-life Catholic and a feminist, Sarah Palin speaks for me. Although I don’t agree with Hillary on abortion, I respect her honesty on this issue. In contrast, Obama simply panders to the most extreme pro-abortion elements while Hillary speaks from the heart.
McCain will be a great president and a real reformer in for the next four years. Then in 2012, we will definitely have our first woman president. Whether it is Sarah or Hillary, it is a win-win situation for all Americans.

Posted by: Dayana Martinez | October 22, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Cliff
“First, raising it even a single point is pointless and counterproductive. Second, color me skeptical that Obama would stop at a 20% rate and $250k/yr. I’ve just never known a liberal democrat to do such a thing.”
I take it you would prefer a “Tax-Cut and Spend-Anyways” conservative..? ;-)

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Cryos:
I disagree with your impression that Obama has a “do as I say not as I do” attitude. But since that is a highly intangible topic, I don’t see the point in debating it.
The argument that Obama has voted with his party more often is, I believe, an indication that he was opposing Bush, not toeing any party line.
As I’ve said to others, I’ve made a big point of reading up on the issues, pursuing the facts and avoiding the spin. If you feel you’ve done the same then I respect your choice.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

I’m done too. At some point I need to get back to work… :)
I’ll just end with this. Obama needs to build on his record. He needs to show bipartisan leadership in the US Senate during the next four years. He needs to show that he can actually cut government waste and support policies that serve to stimulate the economy thereby lifting all boats.
I think once he has accomplished these things, then many more Americans will trust him. At the moment, I sit here with a sheet of paper listing the accomplishments and experience of both Obama and McCain and folks, there just is no comparison.
Cliff out!

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

The argument that Obama has voted with his party more often is, I believe, an indication that he was opposing Bush, not toeing any party line.

Posted by: voter in pa | October 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

When you respond to this post in relation to Obama and socialism I asked about 3+ times with a straight answer and not trying to spin it maybe I’ll believe you are trying to do what you claim. I can respect your viewpoints but everything you say “gets away from the issues” and ONLY criticizes McCain not Obama. Any honest person who is not a “party hack” should be able to say that both sides are wrong in some respects.
GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.
OBAMA: Right.
GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.
So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

The argument that Obama has voted with his party more often is, I believe, an indication that he was opposing Bush, not toeing any party line.
thank you very much. exactly the point why i hate the argument that he was voted the most liberal and he has said so himself in one of the debates, he was in senate while Bush’s disasterous policies were being voted on and his strict voting line with the left relects opposing tax cuts for the wealthy, opposing the war, and many i can’t even begin to list here.

Posted by: voter in pa | October 22, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“I take it you would prefer a “Tax-Cut and Spend-Anyways” conservative..? ;-)”
Nope. I’m a “Tax-Cut and Cut-Spend” conservative. I supported the Bush tax cuts but vehemently opposed the spending increases that were passed under his leadership. I felt it was very irresponsible, and so did John McCain, btw.
Thanks for asking…

Posted by: Cliff | October 22, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“The argument that Obama has voted with his party more often is, I believe, an indication that he was opposing Bush, not toeing any party line.
thank you very much. exactly the point why i hate the argument that he was voted the most liberal and he has said so himself in one of the debates, he was in senate while Bush’s disasterous policies were being voted on and his strict voting line with the left relects opposing tax cuts for the wealthy, opposing the war, and many i can’t even begin to list here.
Posted by: voter in pa”
Well if this is true Obama shouldn’t claim to be so bipartisan. I’m sorry but most intelligent people would judge bipartisanship by bill sponsors and voting records. McCain blows Obama out of the water.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Cryos and cliff, i really do appreciate the civil discourse, its refreshing to see that these days.
for cryos, i doubt you’ll regard huffpost as your preferred source of info but i think that you’ll greatly enjoy reading this article, also quoted NYT and times links in there. explains the whole Bipartisan arguement better than i can on this forum
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/the-bipartisanship-scam_b_101385.html

Posted by: voter in pa | October 22, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Cryos said:
“Sigh done wasting time debating with an Obama blogger. Oh well hopefully some people learned things from the exchange. I get tired of all the deflection used to fill up the blog with rhetoric”
Now you’ve gone and hurt my feelings. I was trying real hard not to be deflective or rhetorical.
Oh well.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Just reading over these many, many comments on Palin, mainly negative, is very amusing as I see how very much she gets under all of your skin. This is great! MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!

Posted by: Cathy | October 22, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Just reading over these many, many comments on Palin, mainly negative, is very amusing as I see how very much she gets under all of your skin. This is great! MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!

Posted by: Cathy | October 22, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Posted by: hottopics | October 22, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“Cryos and cliff, i really do appreciate the civil discourse, its refreshing to see that these days.
for cryos, i doubt you’ll regard huffpost as your preferred source of info but i think that you’ll greatly enjoy reading this article, also quoted NYT and times links in there. explains the whole Bipartisan arguement better than i can on this forum
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/the-bipartisanship-scam_b_101385.html
Interesting read however I disagree with the conclusion. In my opinion the article tries to redefine bipartisanship and basically say “democrats are more correct than republicans.”
FYI I feel things like huffington are biased but I prefer to view things all over he spectrum and make my own decisions from them so I’ll never refuse to evaluate something on its merits because of its source.
Republicans could also cherry pick a few issues that it claims “are more in the american mainstream” and claim the exact same thing.
My issue is with Obama’s bipartisan claims yet he has voted even more to the left than most people in his party.
It will get deleted quickly but I thought the times analysis was a good one also. It based the analysis on voting records and bill sponsorships. It also approached “controversial” type bipartisanship where candidates took risks upsetting their party. Bill sponsorships I think are a good indication since it indicates that the bill as originally drafted has support of differing politics.
If you dont see the link google “washington times mccain bipartisanship” and it is the first link.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/15/records-show-mccain-more-bipartisan//

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Voter in PA ditto; thanks! Concerned I also appreciate the civil discourse but feel you have been disingenuous in some of your replies and changing of subjects. However many of your opinions are well thought out and I respect that.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Cathy there are many comments here about Palin because this is who the article is about.

Posted by: d | October 22, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

FYI my google criteria wasn’t meant to throw the discussion off it is the first thing I checked since it is in the title. You could also google “washington times obama bipartisanship” :)

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Thanks Cryos,
And while I feel some of your arguments are red-herrings ( no pun intended ;) ) I’m happy for the exchange. I do see where you are coming from.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“”Cryos said:
“Sigh done wasting time debating with an Obama blogger. Oh well hopefully some people learned things from the exchange. I get tired of all the deflection used to fill up the blog with rhetoric”
Now you’ve gone and hurt my feelings. I was trying real hard not to be deflective or rhetorical.
Oh well.
Posted by: Concerned”
We were first discussing Obama and socialism and I brought up 2 concrete things to address. I have asked no less than 4 times to address the Gibson capital gains issue and you won’t even acknowledge it or comment on it. I don’t see how you could be more deflective or rhetorical than that.
In my opinion Obama’s answer speaks for itself that he considers “fairness” above economic concerns in taxation. I guess I’m curious what other type of conclusion to draw. I hold statements like this with high significance given the limited pool of adhoc statements by Obama not part of talking points or stump speeches.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

You must have missed my comment on capital gains. I don’t have a problem with him rolling back the plan to 1/3 less than Reagan’s.
*shrug*

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

PS ….that’s for people making net > 200k

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

He also proposed freezing capital gains taxes temporarily so that people who need access to their money during this crisis could get it.
I’ve said this before, so how is that deflective or rhetorical?

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

To every Hillary Clinton supporter voting for John McCain because he picked Sarah Palin…
Thanks for proving you’re just as stupid and shallow as they hoped and expected you would be.

Posted by: Mia | October 22, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Nice try concerned. You avoided the subject then try deflecting it to Reagan and a temporary measure. You still didn’t answer the socialism related aspect.
Oh well I shouldn’t expect much out of Obama bloggers. Maybe you should ask for them to put a canned answer to that on their website or searchable database.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Posting one more time so Concerned’s paid blogger distractions don’t scroll it way up.
Here is a very relevant question regarding Obama and socialism.
Concerned, the “joe the plumber” off the cuff remark and I think an unplanned reply to Gibson regarding capital gains taxes to me solidified “socialist” type leanings I was highly suspicious of. Among other “warning signs” I interpreted were:
1. He has voted for tax increases across the board from his voting records
2. Many of his mentors are marxist, socialist and communist. Unless you agree at least to a degree with their ideals I wouldn’t think you would consider them your mentors.
3. He has changed his tune many times. Against Hillary the cap was $70K but he upped it to $250K for the general election.
Here is the snippet from the Gibson interview. My interpretation was that regardless of evidence that shows lower capital gains is good for government revenue and the economy Obama would still want to raise it for “fairness.” This says to me that he puts “fairness” above economic sense which scares me in more ways than 1.
GIBSON: And George Bush has taken it down to 15 percent.
OBAMA: Right.
GIBSON: And in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased; the government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.
So why raise it at all, especially given the fact that 100 million people in this country own stock and would be affected?
OBAMA: Well, Charlie, what I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Oh and by the way before he solidified his capital gains tax position (another class warfare tactic when solidified), in March Obama made an incorrect claim that an increased rate would result in increased revenues for the government. Yet another inconsistency showing his lack of knowledge in economics since evidence shows the contrary and another item the media didn’t follow up on.
BARTIROMO: How do you plan to change the tax code when it comes to capital gains? How high will that 15 percent rate go?
Sen. OBAMA: Well, you know, I haven’t given a firm number. Here’s my belief, that we can’t go back to some of the, you know, confiscatory rates that existed in the past that distorted sound economics. And I certainly would not go above what existed under Bill Clinton, which was the 28 percent. I would–and my guess would be it would be significantly lower than that. I think that we can have a capital gains rate that is higher than 15 percent. If it–and if it, you know–when I talk to people like Warren Buffet or others and I ask them, you know, what’s–how much of a difference is it going to be if it’s 20 or 25 percent, they say, look, if it’s within that range then it’s not going to distort, I think, economic decision making. On the other hand, what it will also do is first of all help out the federal treasury, which is running a credit card up with the bank of China and other countries. What it will also do, I think, is allow us to make investments in basic scientific research, in infrastructure, in broadband lines, in green energy and will allow us to give us–give some relief to middle class and working class families who have been driving this economy as consumers but have been doing it through credit cards and home equity loans. They’re not going to be able to do that. And if we want the economy to continue to go strong, then we’ve got to make sure that they’re getting a little relief as well.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Cryos,
1.) Asked and answered.
2.) Asked and answered.
3.) 70k is not what he’s proposing in his plan, and I can’t find anything about his past proposal- which would be moot at this point.
Your interview snippet…I’m not sure of your point, but I’ve already posted several answers regarding capital gains.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“Q: Is McCain going to go after you as another classic liberal tax and spender?
A: Well, I’m going to go right back at McCain, because look at his tax proposals. He not only wants to continue some of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and corporations, he actually wants to extend them, and he hasn’t told us really how he’s going to pay for them. It is irresponsible. And the irony is he said it was irresponsible. When George Bush initiated these tax cuts in 2001, McCain said, “This is shameful.” He said that it offended his conscience, he said, for us to give tax breaks to the wealthy, particularly at a time of war. If you look at my approach to taxation, what have I said? I said I would cut taxes for people making $75,000 a year or less. I’d cut taxes for seniors who are making $50,000 a year or less. It is true that I would roll back the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans back to the level they were under Bill Clinton, when I don’t remember rich people feeling oppressed.”

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

That quote does not say he would raise taxes for people making 75-200. They would stay the same. You missed something here.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Concerned here was your statement that Obama is being “unfairly” accused as a socialist and my response was to bring up 2 relevant issues Joe the plumber and the Gibson interview. I made it very clear the posts were related to Obama and socialism.
You put:
But here’s what I REALLY don’t want. I don’t want a good presidential candidate demonized as a socialist unfairly. He’s not doing anything radical. And if he does bolster this country and get the economy back to where we were in 2000 every one will be better off.”
This is my last post so I won’t be giving further replies but the fact I clearly stated please explain Obama’s capital gains policy as related to socialism several times makes it pretty funny to hear you not address it and say “whats your point.”
Take care.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

That quote does not say he would raise taxes for people making 75-200. They would stay the same. You missed something here.
Posted by: Concerned
Article quote:
I said I would cut taxes for people making $75,000 a year or less.
Your spin is getting more and more desperate. He only extended TAX CUTS up to $75k (70K was a mistake I made). It is VERY relevant since it hints that his tax cut caps vary according to his audience.
Once again take care.

Posted by: Cryos | October 22, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Clearly you missed it.
You take care, too.

Posted by: Concerned | October 22, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

For every Democratic party offical whom made a sexist and misognyist comment or stood silently by while Hillary was attacked you must be held accountable. For every Obama supporter that made sexist and misognyist comments about Hillary you must be held accountable. For every MSM whom attacked Hillary with misognyist and sexist comments against must be held accountable.
Now is the time to pay. This life long Democrat voted down ticket Republican today. Damn it felt good too.

Posted by: TLINTX | October 22, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Obama will have to raise taxes on anyone making $75,000.topay for his programs—Do you still like this redistribution of wealth?? —–
In all, three out of every five voters will pay little or nothing in income taxes under Mr. Obama’s plans and gain when taxes rise on the 40% that already pays 95% of income tax revenues.
The plunder that the Democrats plan to extract from the “very rich” — the 5% that earn more than $250,000 and who already pay 60% of the federal income tax bill — will never stretch to cover the expansive programs Mr. Obama promises.
What next? A core group of Obama enthusiasts — those educated professionals who applaud the “fairness” of their candidate’s tax plans — will soon see their $100,000-$150,000 incomes targeted. As entitlements expand and a self-interested majority votes, the higher tax brackets will kick in at lower levels down the ladder, all the way to households with a $75,000 income.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 22, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

TLINTX–I totally agree –to let this go unchecked is far more dangerous than to vote for McCain considering the DEM’s will control Congress. I decided to vote for McCain when they took the delegates from Hillary in that back room deal where they appointed Obama.

Posted by: amazed801 | October 22, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Obama snubbed Hillary for VP and now, he begs for her campaign support. Obama used Hillary when it benefits him, she is only a woman. This is how Obama treats women, in his own staff, the women receive about 25% less in wages.
This is the policy of people of other nations, not real Americans. Obama being raised in Indonesia has different view points regarding women.
It’s now in the courts about Obama and his status as an illegal alien. Obama is a citizen of Indonesia, as described in Federal Court, case: no. 08-cv-04083

Posted by: Bernie | October 22, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Mc Cain/Palin 2008!

Posted by: Anna | October 22, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Sarah Palin “A Legend In Her Own Mind”. The division and hatred she spreads should be enough to disqualify her from the election.

Posted by: rdf | October 22, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

amazed801;”What next? A core group of Obama enthusiasts — those educated professionals who applaud the “fairness” of their candidate’s tax plans — will soon see their $100,000-$150,000 incomes targeted. As entitlements expand and a self-interested majority votes, the higher tax brackets will kick in at lower levels down the ladder, all the way to households with a $75,000 income.”
So, what does that all mean..? People making >250 grand might have to choose the Acura, instead of the BMW..?
EEEK!!!! THE HORROR!!!!111!
Gadzooks, amazed801, don’t scare the rich people like that before Halloween!

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

@ Bernie; If Obama is an Indonesian, then McCain is a Panamanian on the same basis. RE-BOOT!!! Its back to choosing primary candidates for all of us!!! :-)

Posted by: Torrboy | October 22, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Obama doesn’t care about women’s issues. Why should he?
His treatment of women is patronizing and dismissive.
Much like these dumb blonde stereotypes who sleep their way to the top! He’s just lying his way to the top job!
but do we have to suffer his fat ego!?
Posted by: pat | Oct 22, 2008 4:15:53 PM
EASY COWBOY you gonna hurt yourself with all this contradiction you’re doing.
soooo.. where did you meet Barack? how long you’ve known him?
or are you just ingesting whatever the GOP served for lunch yesterday?
two words for you:
CHELSEA RENO

Posted by: GIGI | October 22, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Not happening. Palin has already shown the women in this country who she is and what she stands for and the vote is in on her.
Take away a womans rights.
Lies like a pro. Sold a plane on ebay lately?
Reformer? Not hardly. The bridge to no where? Just one example.
Read any books lately?
This was a judgement call for John McCain and he sold out the safety of this country.
Clinton? would never even consent to talk to this woman if they ever met.

Posted by: Deanna | October 22, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

SOLVE THE EQUATION
MCCAIN: FOREIGN POLICY, DOMESTIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PALIN: DOMESTIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS
OBAMA: NONE(MANIPULATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, KOOL-AID)
BIDEN: FOREIGN POLICY
DO THE MATH!
GO PALIN!!!!

Posted by: QUEEN | October 22, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I see Palin loves to live dangerously.Didnt she learn her first lesson about pandering!? Obama opted out on Hillary on reasons which actually had nothing to do with Hillary personally.

Posted by: patrick | October 22, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I’m a PUMA voting for McCain. Palin is just icing on the cake.
No Way, No How, NoBama!!
Hillary 2012!!

Posted by: Carol | October 23, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Great speech by Gov. Palin. She is right about Mr. Pig I mean Senator Obama. You ask an Obot about his paying his senate staff they will tell you he couldn’t find any qualified women. That is his attitude. He has treated women horribly during this year and even insulted my intelligence by using Roe vs Wade which is established law.
If he is such a believer in the equal pay law then let him prove it by increasing the salaries of the women who work in his office.
He doesn’t give a damn about women.
His idea of a woman’s right to choose is that she can make the choice only if she talks to some male. He is one of the worst pigs that I have ever seen run for office.
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: hillarysmygirl08 | October 23, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

hillarysmygirl08 WARNING
You sound very angry…the Rove handbook tactics have worked on you. Do you understand anger is actually a secondary emotion? Anger is the secondary emotion to the primary emotions of: fear, insecurity or frustration. The Q you ought to ask is how do you get from supporting Hillary to Palin, polar opposites? You are voting with your emotions…fine…just understand how manipulated you have been…I was blind and now I see…and it is with amazing grace I will vote for Obama…

Posted by: Grace | October 23, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Well, well, well….Hillary was not good enough for Obama to pick as V.P. even with her 18 million voters he would have had… but she is good enough to act as his surrogate to get him elected? She has traveled to 55 events on his behalf – classy as usual Hillary. She helps where ever she is needed. Unfortunately, he is using you Hillary..we Hillary supporters will vote for McCain, put up with him for 4 years and elect Hillary in 2012, if we are lucky enough that she wants to run again. You could have had it all Obama but your sexist attitude and gigantic ego would not allow you to have a woman as your V.P. Even Joe Biden said she would have been a bettr choice. You blew it Obama…don’t listen to the polls..there are many of us who are lying to the pollsters and will vote republican this time. You blew it Obama….

Posted by: JackieWoman | October 23, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

How many “Hockey Moms” have 150,000 dollars worth of clothes? Yeah, she’s authentic just like the rest of the phony hypocritic republicans and their party.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | October 23, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

“Hillary was not good enough for Obama to pick as V.P. ”
JackieWoman; Hillary is plenty good enough for VP; along with about 20 others… but former primary opponents rarely make good running mates.
Can anyone name a 2nd place losing presidential primary opponent, that was given the nod for their party’s VP spot in the main election within the same year? I honestly don’t think there are any…

Posted by: Torrboy | October 23, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Lest you forget – this election is between an elected candidate John McCain of the Republican Party and a selected candidate forced on us by the Democrat Party.
In the name of Liberty – Please vote on Nov. 4 and make that vote count toward the prevention of an illegitimate coronation of a man who does not deserve to be president. God forbid he winds up with The Oval Office – The House – The Senate- The Treasury – The Justice Dept. and The Media! Think about it! And they hate Women!
Our failure to interrupt Obama’s plans will in fact result in his success. The only thing that ensures him that success is OUR Failure to intercede!
Is Sarah a feminist? You betcha!
When I read Governor Sarah Palin’s explicitly feminist political speech given in Nevada on 10/21, I choose to believe she meant what she said – why shouldn’t I? It is clear that this woman is her own person and she has made her own choices and she has climbed the ladder of success on her own merits. She was not cultivated as a politician – she owes no one any favors and she is one of us with all her differences – she is woman watch her roar.
Please pass a copy of her speech on to every women you know and ask her to have another look and decide how much longer we will wait for a THE perfect women to show up? You know the woman that will appeal to everyone in the country — apparently that is what we are looking for right? Hillary wouldn’t do for half the country and now Sarah will not for the other half. Stop the insanity and let’s give this woman-the same opportunity we have always given the men we have elected – when’s the last time you agreed totally with any one of them?

Posted by: BettyJean Kling | October 23, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

“Why isnt ABC cover the news that Al-Quaida wants McCain as president?”
Joe:
Why isn’y ANYbody? If they had endorsed Obama….can you imagine!?
I am also looking ANYWHERE for something on the depositions (under oath) that the Palin’s have to give tomorrow. Strange.

Posted by: JDL | October 23, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

And I’d LOVE to watch Hillary mop the floor with Palin in ’16.

Posted by: JDL | October 23, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

you can never complain about the way hillary clinton was treated. you know damn good and well how it felt to you, and now you do it to palin…Hypocritical nobody…liberals never end, if the liberals have their way, they will require women with children with disabilities to be aborted. Good luck and god help us if you get in and make this country a communist country…

Posted by: Nick | October 23, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Date:Thurs Oct 23,2008
Time:7:13PM
Hillary PUMA
Re: On Thursday Philip Berg filed an Temmporary Restraining order against Barry Soetore..aka Barack Obama to stop campagining..a once.
I think it’s safe to assume that if Barack Obama, continues to defey order court’s to hault his campagin..he could then be arrested ..I think this is what Gov.Palin is really trying to say to the public at large.
Sincerely,
Emmery Jones Jr
Medical Record’s Admin.CCS-P
WCSU Radio.com kb9Zxe
Graduate:William Rainey Harper College

Posted by: Emmery Jones Jr Medical Records Admin.CCS-P | October 23, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.