By Nitya

Oct 1, 2008 8:05am

Palin Suggests Interviewers are Journalistically Unethical and Have Problem with “Joe Sixpack”

I suppose this is one of the questions conservatives take issue with: Katie Couric asking Gov. Sarah Palin what printed periodicals have helped shape her worldview.

The Wall Street Journal? Dexter Filkins in the Times? Foreign Affairs? The Economist? The National Review? The Weekly Standard?

Katie Couric: And when it comes to establishing your worldview, I was curious: what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this to stay informed and to understand the world?

Sarah Palin: I’ve read most of them, again with a great appreciation for the press, for the media.

Couric: But, like, what ones specifically? I’m curious that you –

Palin: All of ‘em, any of ‘em that have been in front of me over all these years.

Couric: Can you name a few?

Palin: I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news too. Alaska isn’t a foreign country, where, it’s kind of suggested and it seems like, ‘Wow, how could you keep in touch with what the rest of Washington, D.C. may be thinking and doing when you live up there in Alaska?’ Believe me, Alaska is like a microcosm of America.

Calling into Hugh Hewitt (listen HERE), Palin said that the media is "just not used to someone coming in from the outside saying, ‘You know what? It’s time that normal Joe Sixpack American is finally represented in the position of vice presidency,’ and I think that that’s kind of taken some people off guard, and they’re out of sorts, and they’re ticked off about it."

Hewitt said that the interviews by Couric and ABC News’ Charlie Gibson "struck many as sort of pop quizzes designed to embarrass you as opposed to interviews."

"Well, I have a degree in journalism also," Palin said, "so it surprises me that so much has changed since I received my education in journalistic ethics all those years ago. But I’m not going to pick a fight with those who buy ink by the barrelful. I’m going to take those shots and those pop quizzes and just say that’s okay, those are good testing grounds. And they can continue on in that mode. That’s good. That makes somebody work even harder. It makes somebody be even clearer and more articulate in their positions. So really I don’t fight it. I invite it."

"Do you think the mainstream media and the left understands your religious faith, Governor Palin?" Hewitt asked.

"I think that there’s a lot of mocking of my personal faith," she said. "And my personal faith is very, very simple. I don’t belong to any church. I do have a strong belief in God, and I believe that I’m a heck of a lot better off putting my life in God’s hands, and saying hey, you know, guide me. What else do we have but guidance that we would seek from a Creator? That’s about as simple as it gets with my faith, and I think that there is a lot of mocking of that. And you know, so bet it, though I do have respect for those who have differing views than I do on faith, on religion. I’m not going to mock them, and I would hope that they would kind of I guess give me the same courtesy through this of not mocking a person’s faith, but maybe perhaps even trying to understand a little bit of it."

- jpt

User Comments

Why does Palin have such ha problem with the media? They are what made her such a political superstar and lavished her with attention that literally changed the race for a month. Will voters see this as whining and get turned off?

Posted by: matt | October 1, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Gov. Palin had a very good day with the media yesterday. She more than held her own with Couric and did well with Hugh Hewitt.
She has turned the corner, realizing that it is all about gotcha journalism and not fact finding. If anything, she had been over accommodating in trying to respond to media questions.
As for her faith, what? She doesn’t worship at the altar of Wall Street or Rev. Wright? She loves America?

Posted by: Captain America | October 1, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Gwenn Ifill, Obama groupie, is the moderator of a debate? ABC/WaPo poll which shows OBama losing ground, his lead shrinking from 9 to 5 percentage points, WHERE IS IT??? No Where. ABC News won’t show their own poll, went poll shopping and goes with Quinnipiac Poll that has always tilted Obama. You can’t make this up. Ask ABC News — where is your poll??? Obama loses 5 percentage points, and they bury the poll

Posted by: Karen | October 1, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

A small village in Alaska is missing it’s idiot.

Posted by: Jackson in NC | October 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Joe Biden also calls himself “Joe Sixpack” and unlike Obama he does come across as a “regular Joe”.
Palin is trying to play the “elitist” charge against the media which won’t work since she is debating a guy who comes across as a regular guy.

Posted by: Sandra | October 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Oh my God. This is the best video yet. She’s never even read a news magazine or newspaper? Probably never read a book either. Maybe she can’t even read. God help us if she is elected.

Posted by: clifton | October 1, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

She’s absolutely right. The mainstream media has been a disgrace in this election. The real winner in this campaign is Fox News. I used to make fun of them. Now I tune in. ABC, NBC and CBS are a disgrace. MSNBC and CNN are a joke.

Posted by: Carrie | October 1, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

The big talk today wll be about Gwen Ifill “moderating” the debate when she has a laudatory book about Obama coming out. Fark and Malkin have the story up now but it will spread.

Posted by: katmandu | October 1, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Fox is harping on
JUST LET SARAH BE SARAH
They say that the McCain campaign is trying to stuff her with too many talkinpoints.
HELLO
WE DON’T KNOW SARAH. NEVER MET HER. EVER
How do we know when Sarah is being Sarah.
The interviews, when she is unplugged from the teleprompter and her memorized stump speech is ALL we have to learn of her.
VERDICT: She is a Bimbo to highest Degree. Even for the average person she seems to be ditsy. But as a VP candidate OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is down right SCARY.
When will this Bad Disney Movie end.
Hopefully it will end on November 4th as she takes her plane back to Alaska to resume her role as Governor of Alaska.

Posted by: Omentum | October 1, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Great. Just what we need… a VP who doesn’t read and wants to just put her life (and ours) in God’s hands. Sound famliar? I hope the American people have had enough of leaders who wing it at their expense.

Posted by: Liznh | October 1, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Look at the these poll numbers
Quinnipiac
Ohio: Obama +8
Florida: Obama +8
PA: Obama +15
InAdv/PollPosition
Virginia: Obama +6
PPP poll
North Carolina: Obama +2
Electoral Map from Real Clear Politics (based on polls of polls)
Obama/Biden 348 McCain/Palin 190

Posted by: Vanessa | October 1, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Palin has already admitted perviously that she doesn’t read nationanl paper, she educated herself through books.
I cannot understand how so many are defending her lack of general knowledge! Are you all feeling that everyone is attacking her because she is a women? I don’t get it. She is in the political process and must face ceratin questions. Did they give Obama a chance, notta…..Sarah, grow up and stop whinning….You’re in the BIG times now.

Posted by: thetruth | October 1, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Jackson in NC…you from a small town in Alaska?

Posted by: Captain America | October 1, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I wonder why did’t Couric ask Obama;Which church do you go to?How long have you attended it?Who is your pastor?What are the things that have attracted you to this church and it’s preaching?In what way has your pastor helped shape your worldview?Only they needed to be asked in 2007…
ex democrat

Posted by: jol | October 1, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Ok Gwen Ifill is a upstanding person and has been critical of Obama.
She is professional enough to be fair and balanced and is level headed enough (unlike charlie and stephonolicus) to not be biased in their moderating.
You know what….. point taken…. take Gwen down and you can have SEAN HANNITY MODERATING…. She would still not have an advantage.
Stop crying about petty things.

Posted by: Omentum | October 1, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I was a teacher, I can imagine the outcome if when asked what preparations I had made to guide my students I had said:
“all of them.”
“all the ones right there in front of me.”
Palin is all about guns babies and bibles.
That’s sufficient for the fundies. They
don’t care if she’s remotely prepared to be VP or President as long as she says the right things on their social issues.

Posted by: Gus | October 1, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Jackson said:
A small village in Alaska is missing it’s idiot..
This is SO funny, and sadly true. I thing Sarah Palin is on a high that the McCain team created for her. I feel sorry that she and her family have been dragged into this mess. She should have declined when asked to run…Unfortunately her desire for power was stronger that her womenly instints.

Posted by: formerhillary | October 1, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

shall we repeat the mantra
the worst show of self centered-putting themself-so-far-ahead-of-the-country-bad-judgment-and -same-8year-tactics-
this nation has ever seen.
the worst VP nominee our nation has ever seen in it’s history.
The worst attempted Presidential candidate decision in our history.
The worst ticket in the HISTORY of our nation
McCain and Palin
throw these bums out.

Posted by: dl | October 1, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Crazy Joe a “regular Joe” …oh….no

Posted by: Captain America | October 1, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

What? Did she say something that isn’t 100% true? THE MEDIA HAS LOST IT’S ETHICS, they are no longer credible, a joke even, people should honor another persons right to religion of their choice. Do you have to have a subscription of a magazine come to your house to read it? Ever hear of online, standing in line at the grocery, the dr’s office, tv????

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 1, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Okay, that’s right, blame it on the media for asking questions. After all, what we need in the US is a VP or a potential president who can’t find most countries of the world and who doesn’t read books or newspapers.
But wait, didn’t we just try that? I don’t think it worked so well.
BTW I am with Larry King, who is this “media” that the Right is harping about? Is it anyone in the press who doesn’t mindlessly repeat GOP talking points?
Is that how one arrives at the conclusion that Gwen Ifil is biased, but Michelle Malkin (who is not even a journalist but an op-ed columnist) is objective?

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | October 1, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

SHE CAN NOT EVEN NAME ONE MAGAZINE SHE REGULARLY READ!!! Again, the GOP blames the media for asking unfair question because she does not read.

Posted by: CT | October 1, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

jol…don’t you think we have all been down that road with Obama already…the interview was to get to know Palin..
Stop being defensive. She is the one who decided to run for VP. It is part of the territory.

Posted by: happless | October 1, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

The worst nominee for any national office we have ever seen.
It would be a joke if it weren’t so bad…and so harmful to our nation.
John McCain took a swipe at our nation for his own career…the likes of which we have never seen.
John McCain picking sarah palin…throwing any protection or safety on any issue
throwing our nation under the bus for his own election ploy and tactics…
disgusting the country should be revolted.

Posted by: dl | October 1, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

CT…she has already stated in a previous interview she get her information from books, she doesn’t read national news papers….

Posted by: thetruth | October 1, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Palin doesn’t belong to any church, she says. Really? What about the Wasilla Assembly of God?

Posted by: obamamama | October 1, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Gov. Sarah Palin,
STOP MAKING EXCUSES FOR YOUR ABYSMAL PERFORMANCES. You have only youself to blame. If a simple question on your stand in Pakistan is a “gotcha” for you, I’m sorry, you’re definitely out of your league and not ready to be Vice-President, or God forbid, President of the United States of America.
Couric didn’t say: “Now Governor, tell me in detail what you and John McCain will do in Pakistan.” or “Now, what do you feel about the (insert some obscure legislation) bill?”
It’s her own fault she doesn’t even know the stand her running mate had on Pakistan. Come on. The media has had a field day with Biden’s gaffes too.
The media is practically a harmless, nice, docile house cat in comparison to the leaders of rogue governments like Ahmadinejad.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Who is in charge of choosing whi is th moderator in these debates anyway?

Posted by: mainegirl | October 1, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

OK… So ask her about what books she’s read that have informed her thinking about how to govern. I’ll be she won’t have a good answer to that question either.

Posted by: Liznh | October 1, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

I’m beginning to think Alaska is a foreign country! It’s hard to understand what Palin is babbling about. She can’t put a coherent sentence together and she was a journalism major?

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

I don’t have a problem with “Joe Six-pack”, I just don’t want him/her to be President and have their finger on the firing key. If you do then you are either just a moron or someone who is Joe and thinks they have the ability to LEAD our country. Look at what the current Joe SP has done for us. Yes he is Joe he is just Joe from a wealthy family and he wants you to think he is down home. His record suggests something a bit more sinister.

Posted by: wirey | October 1, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Please stopwith the liberal, gotcha media excuses. Yes, that is what is is–and excuse. If God forbid she is called upon to be the leader ofthis country, guess what she has to answer questions not only for the alleged biased media in this country but form all over the world. She has to answer questions from leaders who donot necessarily “like us”.
Palin is the one who said she did not get a backpack and go off to Europe. Palin said she learned from reading. It is a perfectly legitimate question to ask her, ok, what did you read–what formulates your views.
Why do people insiston coddling her? If you are going to step up tosucha position, then step up–answer the questions.
Please wake up america–no she does not have to be a scholar–but should be more intelligent and educated than “Joe sixpack” if you are to be a leader. At the veryleast, she should show a level of intellectual curiosity.
Remember who is in the White House now–someone else who claimed not to read…

Posted by: Wkae up america | October 1, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Sarah
What books magazines and papers to you read?
IS THAT A GOTCHA QUESTION.
GET SERIOUS
PLEASE

Posted by: Omentum | October 1, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

What a great idea: read a book to learn how to govern! Right out of Obummer’s ACORN playbook I bet! Liznh: There’s no substitute for experience, and Obummer has none (except for his ACORN community service record). Good one.

Posted by: hubba bubba | October 1, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

My dictionary defines “moderator” as “the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting.” On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.
But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She’s so far in the tank for the Democratic presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.

Posted by: HP Boston | October 1, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Palin’s faith? She attends services where the preacher casts out witches. Have you seen the video where Palin brags to a congregation that her preacher prayed over her by laying of hands,(video shows Palin at the alter with others laying their hands on her) to be protected against witches and it is her destiny to lead the people? Pretty spooky stuff and NOT your average American’s religion.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Some drudge viewers are trying to bring up Gwen Ifii as an issue while totally negating the story of Tom Brokav who is in the tank for Mccain. Gwen Ifii is black but a professional and is not moderating a debate between Obama and Mccain. A lot of Americans still remain closet-racists. Anything involving any black person must be wrong for this country. It really amazes me.

Posted by: vuzous | October 1, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

My dictionary defines “moderator” as “the nonpartisan presiding officer of a town meeting.” On Thursday, PBS anchor Gwen Ifill will serve as moderator for the first and only vice presidential debate. The stakes are high. The Commission on Presidential Debates, with the assent of the two campaigns, decided not to impose any guidelines on her duties or questions.
But there is nothing “moderate” about where Ifill stands on Barack Obama. She’s so far in the tank for the Democratic presidential candidate, her oxygen delivery line is running out.

Posted by: HP Boston | October 1, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Wake Up America,
Precisely. I myself don’t profess to be an expert on the dynamics of Iran and Israel even though I’ve read about it before, but I am sure anyone with common sense knows you cannot not “second guess” Israel AT ALL.
I suppose it’s because she didn’t even read the newspapers like most normal folks do, which is why she thought Russia was the one who started the Ossetian Conflict when the general consensus was that there was some provocation on Georgia’s part.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

“Yahoo” features a story saying Palin’s only foreign country negotiation experience is with Candada.
Could I please have a list of the countries which Obama has had actual foreign country negotiation experience with?
None, you say? Because community organizers don’t negotiate with foreign countries. Ok, thanks, that’s what I thought.
MCCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: Christian | October 1, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

McCain does not use internet. Palin does not read newspaper. How do they stay on the top of what is going on around the world??? Image they lead the country with information out of date. That is scary.

Posted by: CT | October 1, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Obama
Biden
Clinton
McCain
Gore
Kerry
People who actually know the issues…in detail.
Experience is only good because of the knowledge it may bring.
It is not about experience
but it is about brains on the issues that face us.
she has no knowledge or grasp of a single one…when she needs to have a grasp of ALL of them.
so like Cheney and Ruummy and Rove and Bushy
they call the media “gotcha”
too bad we didn’t have “gotcha” journalism when they were talking about wmd, katrina, judicial ppointments…etc etc etc.

Posted by: dl | October 1, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Hapless;
I get your point.We have been down the road with Obama but the question of double standards and the sickening media bias in his favor remains.I have no problem with his supporters trying to support him but when the media picks sides in an election and uses double standards in terms of the scrutiny it puts the candidates through it is unethical and just WRONG.

Posted by: jol | October 1, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Couric…please. Get back to the kitchen where you belong.

Posted by: Larry | October 1, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

You know we have had 16 years of the lowest common denominator mentally (Bush) and ethically (Clinton). I think it is high time that we had someone smart amd ethical to challange this country to rise above its lowest common denominator and soar as it has done before. That is Obama. You do not get to this level of politics without a few questionable associates. Obama has some as does McCain. Lay off ACORN, and the Chicago thugs. McCain has his own thugs, they are just a bit more suttle and white.

Posted by: jenny | October 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Palin is not qualified to be vp, that’s plain and simple. My problem isn’t with Palin anymore, but the naive followers who have fallen for the republican spin that the media is being unfair. ‘Why don’t they ask Obama what he reads?’ someone asked. Once again, it should be a rule that if you are going to vote for a candidate simply because he/she has rock star status with rocks in the head then you shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

Posted by: James | October 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Sarah Palin is not a native Alaskian. In fact , when she became Gov she replaced all the native staff with her friends and family.
A lot of native Alaskians are REALLY mad at her because she promised to create jobs for them. Instead she is drilling, drilling,drilling…and actually ruining their native habitat.
Checkout Alaskian news for yourself.

Posted by: militarymom | October 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

VP debate moderator Ifill releasing pro-Obama book
The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama (Hardcover)
by Gwen Ifill (Author)
A DISLCAIMER NEEDS TO GIVEN AT THE START OF THE DEBATE. IFILL MUST INFORM THE VIEWERS SHE HAS THIS BOOK COMING OUT JAN 20, 2009.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

jol, where have you been? Obama did get vetted for his religious beliefs, about 6 months ago and it was “discussed” in the media for over three weeks! We’re being too easy on Ms. Palin regarding her fanatic religious beliefs, and her preacher that casts out witches, who’s well reknowned in Afirca by the way.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Isn’t Sarah Palin just stupid?!? They should release her 7 undergraduate transcripts for all to see and compare them to Barack Obama’s. Devote an entire spread to it in the New York Times. Have Srah’s 7 transcripts and juxtapose them with Obama’s 2 transcripts from Occidental and Columbia. It will show how much better he did in school. But wait, we can’t do that because Barack Obama will not release his transcripts from Columbia.
But who cares about that because his grades at Columbia must be good because he got into Harvard right? He did NOT graduate from Columbia with Honors. So while his grades, were not gobviously good enough to get into Harvard Law school his LSAT must have been. But he won’t release that score either. Oh well, he was editor of the Law review, so we will just put up a brilliant article that he wrote for the journal….But wait he never published anything in the journal.There doesn’t seem to be any record of Obama publishing anything in his own journal.
According to an HLR editor:
ormer editor of HLR claimed on Volokh:
“The law students on the Review all have the right to publish at least one piece (typically they publish at least their third-year papers, which they have to write anyway), and many publish at least two pieces. It is surprising that Obama published nothing at all in the very Law Review over which, he has so often boasted, he presided as ‘President.’”

Posted by: Subculture of Journalism | October 1, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Gwen Ifil wrote that book before she knew she would be moderating. Once Again the McCain campaign did NOT do their research. A simple google query of Gwen would’ve revealed the pending book. And if Sarah Palin can accept the VP nomination amidst controversy that she was not fully vetted I see no problem with Gwen moderating because of her book. She will be fair and unbiased and both candidates will be given equal time.

Posted by: Truth Seeker | October 1, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

geeville,
If Couric and Gibson are practically mopping the floor with Palin in just INTERVIEWS, INTERVIEWS, mind you, NOT DEBATES, Palin is clearly out of her league. It’s not as though her performance in interviews were exactly reassuring.
The McCain campaign already got the amount of time for the two candidates to discuss the issue shortened- in order to make her mauling by Biden less painful.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

JOL…so you watch FOX? They are one of the most right wing news medias I have eve seen. They have an Obama bashing ever night.
I also think more questions should be aske of Palin on religion, when she is being “blessed” befor she comes to DC, to protect her from witches. This is on tape!!!

Posted by: happless | October 1, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

to “militarymom”
Obama isn’t a native American, either.

Posted by: Christian | October 1, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Jounalists are only unethical when they make Palin look stupid. All the others are okay…duh!

Posted by: pamp205 | October 1, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

CT – my point exactly – While I am sure McCain would know the difference, if something were to happen to him and Palin were to have to order the bombing of the capitol of Georgia I am absolutly certain she would bomb Atlanta. She is so uninformed that she is almost a national security risk.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 1, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I think shes faking it one cannot be this stupid and I dont think she is, I dont like her but I think Mccain and his campaign has controlled her brain like a robot. They wont let her be herself,Her answers are programmed one can clearly see she is nervous about answering questions because shes afraid they wont live up to mccain SHAME ON YOU MCCAIN FOR PICKING HER, YOU HAVE NO CONFINDENCE IN HER WELL WHY SHOULD WE YOU POLITICAL PICK HAS MADE HER THE LAUGHING STOCK AND SHE IS LETTING YOU SARA DROP OUT NOW TO SAVE YOURSELF AND BE EMBARESSED BY A MAN THAT CLEARLY DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HES DOING!

Posted by: angie | October 1, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

geevil…she shouldn’t even be the moderator is she has a publically biased view of either candidate.

Posted by: formerhillary | October 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

The McCain camp had to APPROVE all moderators for ALL debates and they approved the VP moderator. Now, if they didn’t do proper research on her and didn’t know she was writing a book, then that’s their problem. Besides, I don’t think the fact that she wrote a book about black politicians including Obama means she cannot and will not be objective in her questioning of Biden and Palin. If McCain and his supporters have a problem with her now, it’s too bad because they approved her as the moderator. This is just another attempt to explain BEFOREHAND Palin’s predictable poor performance.

Posted by: realitycheck | October 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Christian,
Obama has more common sense, executive experience and intellect (uh should I mention Columbia and Harvard) then Palin has in her pinky.
People in their die hard prejudices cloud the truth. They wantto force a square in a rectangle. Sad…good luck to you and I hope you vote your conscious because when we end up going to war with Pakistan and your kids go, I am going to be the one shaking me head. Gotcha!

Posted by: The truth | October 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

dl YOU are so right. McCain put himself FIRST , above country with this pick!

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

I like Joe Six Pack just fine, but he’s not meant to be VP.

Posted by: Make it MicroBrew | October 1, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

WOW, the under-educated liberal, free-spending Dems are really frightened of Palin’s popularity. If she had been a Dem, Obama would have snapped her up for V.P. in a heartbeat.
LOL

Posted by: Laughing | October 1, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Reporting these days IS unethical. There is no more reporting the news, but rather making the news. Statements are taken WAY out of proportion and made into screaming headlines.
I only need to point to the primary race and the treatment Bill Clinton received. He was accused of being a racist, for gosh sakes.
Obama’s lucky that Bill is even willing to stand on the same stage with him.

Posted by: mak | October 1, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Christian …that wasn’t my point, …my point was, she promised Alaskians that the native Americans, who are dire straights because the drilling is taking their native land, will get help. She renigged and put her own “people” in..
BTW, Hawaii is part of the US….HELLO…

Posted by: militarymom | October 1, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

I am tired of McCain’s and Palin’s antics. Whenever they screw up, they blame someone else, from the Democrats to the journalists or some sort of huge secret conspiracy that favours Obama. Instead of trying to explain themselves, they are so eager to pin the blame on anyone as long as it is not them.
Look at Bush. He was so eager to pin the blae for 9/11 on someone, he (wrongly) pinned it on Saddam. Look where that got us.
Not that Saddam is a good person himself, but jumping into conclusions all the time had cost us the lives of over 3,000 US soldiers, and many more lives of Iraqis.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Yeah, I don’t want someone knowledgeable or accomplished as president or vice president, I want some common slob.

Posted by: JR | October 1, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Last night I decided to watch Hannity and Colmes to glimpse at the other side feelings towards the recent poll numbers.
Republicans are in panic mode. Their throwing everything at Obama. Their claiming media bias when Couric asked Palin about the bailout.LOL.
It’s so sad.
Obama 348 McCain 190

Posted by: Vanessa | October 1, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Mak…Bill deserved everything he got. He was condenscending, abusive and down right rude. It was VERY unbecoming of a former presdient.
Stop blaming Obama for Hillarys loss. She lost the campaign because she underestimated the power of the peoples desire for change.

Posted by: formerhillary | October 1, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

The fundamental issues like guns and abortion are paraded out every four years by the Republicans to “frenzy” people into voting for their candidate. The Republicans will NEVER overturn Roe v. Wade. Why? Because it is a campaign selling point and they’d never give that up. Bush could have had it overturned by now, since 6 of the 9 Supreme Court justices are conservative.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

The lady is just clueless.

Posted by: Realist | October 1, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

McCain does not use internet. Palin does not read newspaper. How do they stay on the top of what is going on around the world???
=============================
Apparently, their handlers tell them what to think and what is important.

Posted by: McLame | October 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Laughing
Are you crazy? The only person who would snap Palin up is Saturday Night Live…the woman is a joke!

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I seems to me that the press gave Obama a lot less slack and he had only been in the senate for 1 year when he started running for office. Is that because Opera endorsed him. What a joke!!!
Look at the coaching and marketing that Obama has had over the past 3 years.
This country is sexist!
I am a former democrat for McCain/Palin!!

Posted by: MArk | October 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Laughing…no Palin wouldn’t have even been considered for the Democratic Party VP….we have a lot of intelligent people to pick from.

Posted by: Realist | October 1, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

It looks like McCain’s political stunts have been turning off voters.
From the polls and electoral map provided by Vanessa, it seems Obama has now taken a lead in North Carolina, Virginia and now even FLORIDA too. He’s also solidly picked up Iowa. All those states were solid Republican in 2004.
Also wasn’t wise for McCain to say the thing about no ethanol subsidies- it’s a very popular policy in the red states- and that’s dangerous since he’s depending on carrying these states now that Obama is eating into his lead in solid Republican states.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Gov Palin has it daggum right.
If you think she’s wrong, find an interview (outside of O’Reilly) where a MSMer asks Sen. Obama a gotcha question. If it has happened, I missed it.

Posted by: Stevereno | October 1, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Mark,
I have no idea why people keep missing the 8 YEARS Obama spent in the Illinois Senate before he was elected to the US Senate.
Palin has been a governor of a state with a smaller population then even the one congressional district Obama represented in the Illinois Senate.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

It’s just not fair of the mean media to ask any questions!
Sarah Palin has practiced for days to be able to spew some meaningless, and unltra-generic platitudes.
Please don’t interrupt her train of thought by asking any more questions!

Posted by: The Evil Media | October 1, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Woohoo Vanessa back pumping her polls. She stood quite silent while McCain was surging. These things come in waves, and so we’ll look for one final wave in the next 35 days where McCain rides in on a battleship and Obama bobs away on his surfboard. McCain shows leadership. Obama shows weakness. End of story.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 1, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

“gotcha question” = any simple question in which Palin makes herself look rediculous

Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP | October 1, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

If she doesn’t make VP She can definitely be a writer for SNL. They used here exact words for Tina Fey and the audience was ROLLING IN THE AISLES!!!
KUDOS PALIN
KUDOS TO YOU

Posted by: Omentum | October 1, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

“Sarah Palin has practiced for days to be able to spew some meaningless, and unltra-generic platitudes.”
I know I hope she does not have her study time interrupted like Barack Obama did. Obama wasted so much time having to go to Washington to deal with an actual crises that he lost precious study time. He wiped the floor up with McCain but still Obama could have done much better if he had more time to study. Shame on Bush for asking him to come to Washington. Shame Shame.

Posted by: Subculture of Journalism | October 1, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

McCain showing leadership?
LOL!
Flip-flops faster then a fish out of water on bail out in a space of a few hours, charges to DC to “fiX” the bailout and calls of the debate, turns out the Reps and Dems there said he didn’t do anything and Obama took charge of the discussion, McCain refuses to take stand, bailout then explodes. Then he is forced to swallow his pride and meet Obama head on in Ole Miss.
Real leadership? Your definitions may be different but I define leadership as someone who thinks and weighs things carefully and does not just jump into the fray without looking before they leap.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

“geevil…she shouldn’t even be the moderator if she has a publically biased view of either candidate”
It is more than bias. It is an ethical problem. Ifill has a FINANCIAL conflict of interest.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

The Foxies are setting up an inevitable Palin loss in the debate as being not her fault, since the moderator was obviously biased. The fact that SP won’t be able to answer questions coherently won’t be mentioned; it will all be put down to that mean moderator who supports the other guy. It won’t much matter, because if the first presidential debate is any guideline, most of the viewers will be Democrats anywho, who already know this poor gal is clueless.
And by the way, all you supposed Democrats turned Republicans, we’re on to you, you phonies. Former Democrats, my foot.

Posted by: Mara | October 1, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

The new surveys show Obama leading McCain in Florida 51 percent to 43 percent, in Ohio 50 percent to 42 percent and in Pennsylvania 54 percent to 39 percent.
Palin will put the nail in the coffin on Thursday.

Posted by: Nat Turner | October 1, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Unethical? The only thing unethical would be not to point out how devastating she and McCain would be for this country.

Posted by: Thinking | October 1, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

geevil,
Do you think anyone can write a book in less than a year? Gwen Ifill started writing the book before she knew she would be the moderator.
As another poster has pointed out, the format and moderators have to be approved by both campaigns. So if the McCain campaign didn’t do their research, it’s their own fault.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Happless,
Fox news is not network news,Couric’s evening news is.There are some journalistic standards that should be followed at that level.You seem to forget for one fox news there is a MSN-OBAMA NBC,CNN,ABC,New York Times all in the tank for Obama for months and months.It is the disdain that the elitist media treats a candidate from middle america.Oh she is a hockey mom who eats moose burger so she could have nothing to do with the hallowed Wall Street Journal!!!
This is not a democrat or republican issue ,it is about journalistic ethics.

Posted by: jol | October 1, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

It doesn’t take a conservative to see that the media is practically running Obama’s campaign for him and trying to undermine McCain and Palin. Just Jake’s comment alone shows his bias. He can’t be an objective journalist either and it is transparent who he really supports. I have a mixed marriage now in that my husband is a democrat and I am a republican convert. Even he thought Katie Couric was nasty towards Sarah Palin.
Ethanol has had an impact on corn prices and also caused food shortages. Obama’s support for ethanol puts money in the pockets if the big ethanol producers which will amount to billions of dollars. This is akin to putting billions of dollars into big oil producers. But you are not taking from the food chain with oil like you are with ethanol, which has not lived up to its expectations.

Posted by: Fran | October 1, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

The new surveys show Obama leading McCain in Florida 51 percent to 43 percent, in Ohio 50 percent to 42 percent and in Pennsylvania 54 percent to 39 percent.
Palin will put the nail in the coffin on Thursday.
As Obama has said time and time again, Palin is not anything to worry about. Confirmed……..Just a flash in the pan.
THIS IS GOING TO BE A LANDSLIDE

Posted by: Nat Turner | October 1, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

McCain has used the “biased” media more tha any other Senator. He was more than happy to appear on every weekly news show whenever possible.
Now he and his sidekick are whining about how unfair it is to ask questions?
Since Palin is crying about the “biased” media, asking her where she gets her new is an extremely viable question.
And, face it, it’s NOT a hard question.
Even when running for governor, Sarah Palin has always delivered generic answers.
“We need to win in Iraq” and “We need to help the average American” sounds great. But ask her HOW….oh, that’s a “gotcha” question.

Posted by: But ot worked in beauty pagents | October 1, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

geevil…my thoughts exactly..

Posted by: militarymom | October 1, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

But to…her amswer is always:
” I’ll get back to ya on that,”

Posted by: formerhillary | October 1, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

One thing that has disturbed me about McCain and Palin’s speeches is their LACK of details (here they were saying Obama was shoddy on details). In her Florida rally, she siad we would reform Washington, but she never answered the question in my head exactly HOW.
What areas can spending be cut? Would you be requiring more transparency? Would you ban the use of emergency budgets without a proper itinery? Would you require a proper breakdown for earmark requests?
She never answered my questions at all.
What is nice and all, but HOW is important.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

McCain shows leadership????????
He “suspended” his campaign and his “leadership couldn’t even bring 1/3 of HIS party to vote on a bill he supported.
What exactly did he lead? Oh yes, defeat.

Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP | October 1, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Fran wrote:
Even he thought Katie Couric was nasty towards Sarah Palin.
Hey Fran…this whole world is nasty. If Palin cannot handle a newsperson, how can she handle a foreign leader who doesn’t like her?

Posted by: militarymom | October 1, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Strange — I don’t remember Caribou Barbie or John McSame complaining about the media when she was picked for the VP spot. News organizations fell all over themselves with their gushing portrayals of the feisty hockey mom and her family.
The GOP’s complaints started only after journalists started doing their jobs to find out who this woman is — and found an unqualified, ignorant candidate who doesn’t seem up to the job.

Posted by: Alex | October 1, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Palin is right, the media is in the tank for Obama.
No other candidate could get away with what he has done in his life or during the campaign.
Everyone is fasinated when Obama speaks, but they are not listening to what he is saying.
He has completely flip-flopped on every issue and everyone still agrees with him.
We have blind sheep voting for Obama and they don’t even know what they are voting for.

Posted by: S Adams | October 1, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Jol…you’re loosing your mind. CNN just did a segment on Obama and his dealings in Chicago…PLEASE spare me the sympathy for McCain and Palin. They made their bed, noe they must sleep in it.

Posted by: happless | October 1, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The Republicans are in panic mode.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 1, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

S Adams,
Those of us who support Obama are not blind sheep. Maybe it’s because Obama happens to be much more telegenic and a great orator. Okay, that aside, maybe it’s because of McCain’s and Palin’s dissing of the media (despite the media’s two week love fest of Palin and Doomsday predictions about the Democrats).
Maybe it’s because they actually tried to chase the reporters covering Palin’s UN meeting out until they threatened not to cover Palin at all.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

S Adama…
Maybe you were out of the country during the Wright fiasco, or the New Yorker cover, or Larry Sinclair lies?
These things were all personal things and had VERY little to do with his policy of the man himself as president, but the media, and I mean ALL the media bombarded for weeks on it….
now it is Palins turn…

Posted by: mil | October 1, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

“geevil,
Do you think anyone can write a book in less than a year? Gwen Ifill started writing the book before she knew she would be the moderator.’
and you make the point. Ifill did not recuse herself from moderating or stop writing thhe book. Does not her employer require ethical disclosures? conflicts of interest?
We all know she is politcally and racially biased. But when you have a FINANCIAL INTEREST in the election that is cause for removal or resignation from moderating the debate.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Palin is whinning already? maybe she should talk to McCains advisor who says all Americans are whinners….

Posted by: formerhillary | October 1, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

The Media has put obama through the ringer and back all of them fox,nbc,cnn,abc every single one Palin if you cant stand the heat GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!

Posted by: angie | October 1, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

geevil….then she should have reclussed herself from moderation.
She knew she was writing this book…
Now because of her disregard this debate could be jeopardized.
Most viewers will see if biased in some way.

Posted by: thetruth | October 1, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

geevill,
I don’t think you should make such assumptions about Gwen because of her race. She may favour Obama- but not primarily because of his race. It’s like the same thing with Hillary. Women supported her because of her stands- that she was a woman was a bonus, not the deciding factor.
By that logic, Ifill will be biased towards Palin because she is a woman too.
Alright, the McCain campaign surely didn’t have any problems with her moderating the debate. I have belief that she has the professionalism to ask fair questions despite her support for Obama. It is not impossible for one to favour a particular side but not allow it to affect their professionalism.
I think the McCain camp must have been assured of that, they certainly did not ask for her to be replaced as moderator.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

How elese are we suppose to know her policies, Her views, if it wernt for the media we have to know if she shares some of the same views as us what are we suppose to do call her?

Posted by: angie | October 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

nat sez: “Palin will put the nail in the coffin on Thursday.”
Possibly, but Obama’s campaign will be in it.
A question for you, Nat: ACORN is indicted in over 12 states and being investigated in more. There is more than enough evidence of voter registration fraud to get convictions. Obama’s role as a community organizer was to train ACORN volunteers in voter registration. Otherwise, he sued banks to give subprime mortgates to unqualified applicants.
Why is it Obama has to cheat to win? If he is all that you say he is, why does he have to tell people to get in other people’s faces, break the law, intimidate and use thuggish tactics?
Why does Obama have to cheat to win?

Posted by: len | October 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

This lady has no brains, little education, and is making a complete idiot of herself. Someone, release her – and us – of the embarrassment.

Posted by: Tess | October 1, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Just remember all you Obama worshippers that if he does win and the dems control congress there will not be anyone to blame anymore you will actually be forced to take responsibility for something. I am sure that is a frightening prospect for a group that blames everything on the other party. Although I am sure the media woill not be critical of anything Obama will do

Posted by: rob | October 1, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

“geevill,
I don’t think you should make such assumptions about Gwen because of her race”
Ok. I will assume Ifill has no racial or any other bias other than financial. However, she has a FINANCIAL stake in the election. Her book sales is contingent of an Obama victory.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I don’t think the interviews were designed to embarass her. They asked political questions that the VP should be able to address. If she was embarassed then that was her fault, not the media’s. Don’t get me wrong: I have no reverence for the media but she is so clearly not prepared for this job.

Posted by: don | October 1, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Palin: “I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news too. Alaska isn’t a foreign country, where, it’s kind of suggested and it seems like, ‘Wow, how could you keep in touch with what the rest of Washington, D.C. may be thinking and doing when you live up there in Alaska?’ Believe me, Alaska is like a microcosm of America”
LOL. SNL Saturday night will be great.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 1, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Only TWP’s could jump to conclusions and think just because someone wrote a book that they would not be able to do their job of “MODERATING” a debate.
Is the sky falling AGAIN TWP’s???
How many times can it fall for you guys???

Posted by: Nat Turner | October 1, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I don’t want Joe Six pack to have the nuclear codes.
And with a degree in journalism, she should be able to name a paper she reads.
I don’t think evangelicals will be happy with her saying she doesn’t go to one particular church. It sounds wishy washy.

Posted by: cincyr | October 1, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Nobody has a problem with Joe Sixpack being represented. However, if Joe Sixpack wants to be the VP, he needs to demonstrate a knowledge of the economy, the world, and the environment. That’s the same for any citizen seeking this office. And yes, this is done through a process of speaking with the media.
Palin has been able to use populist tactics in her Alaska debates, which have been very effective. It’s the details that are murky. The Democrats should not assume she will lose the debate on perception, even if the substance part is a lock.

Posted by: Knowledge is Good | October 1, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

geevil: “We all know she is politcally and racially biased.”
Anyone else not surprised to see the Republicans dealing out the ol’ “she’s a racist!” card? Geevil – you’ve completely lost your right to make up accusations about Obama supporters being the ones to ‘accuse (McCain supporters) of being racist if they raise the slightest complaint about (Obama).’
Her book will not do any better financially if Obama wins than if he loses. Quit working so hard to whine about being persecuted – the election is not a sporting event. By January it will be a historical event and this history book will appeal regardless of if Obama wins or not.

Posted by: jhw539 | October 1, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Palin’s the gift that keeps on giving for the Democrats.

Posted by: Vanessa | October 1, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I wonder how everyone is gonna feel when Obama sends all of the quantanimo prisoners of war to the states for trials where they will get court appointed attornies and we will be forced to pay millions of dollars in taxpayer money to defend the terrorists rights. It makes me sick to even think about it Maybe Obama can defend some of them personally.

Posted by: rob | October 1, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Joe Six Pack — just what we need in the White House with two wars going on and an economic free fall. I hope you yahoos are paying attention and understand that we need the smartest people possible leading us out of the mess the current Joe Six Pack put us in.

Posted by: hang | October 1, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Look at the title and subject matter of Ifill’s book. If I didn’t know better I would of thought it was Michelle Obama’s thesis.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Whatever happened to personal responsibility and the republicans. Palin has played both the sexism card and the elitist card now. Could it be that her woeful interview performances can be blamed on an overall lack of preparedness?

Posted by: Just Askin... | October 1, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Anyone else not surprised to see the Republicans dealing out the ol’ “she’s a racist!”
#1 – I am a Democrat
#2 -Ifill’s book is about race.

Posted by: geevill | October 1, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

ifills book was being written long before she was picked to moderate the debate
the campaigns have to agree on the moderators
sooooo either mccain camp didnt do their homework, or they didnt see it as a significant factor

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Anyone not reading the papers today is doing themselves a favor 95% of the are just liberal rags trying to push their liberal agendas. You are not missing anything not reading them

Posted by: rob | October 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

ifill being moderator means nothing compared to the fact that the mccain camp is sinking and they need to try to tread some water and gain some ground
so they are going to do and say anything
they are desperate

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I tell you what, let’s keep this on the up and up. At the McCain/Obama debate, let Jerome R. Corsi moderate, or better, Lou Dobbs.
People with a financial interest in the outcome should be disqualified as moderators.

Posted by: len | October 1, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

I thought the most interesting comment was that she does not belong to a church!
What!?!?!

Posted by: henry | October 1, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Why is it when Charlie Gibson or Katie Couric interview Palin and she is unable to answer the question, Charlie and Katie are too hard on her????????? Anyone else has had to face the press. She is not a prima donna, if she wants to be in the political world, she had better learn a few things – like foreign policy, economy to mention a couple of items.

Posted by: lm | October 1, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

geevill,
Yeah, her book is about race- about African American politicians, I think.
Look, so what if it’s about race? Is it wrong to discuss that? It’s not anything like “Black Power!” or “Toss the White Man into the Sea!”\
And about the whole Guantanamo Bay thing. I would think that common sense dictates that when you detain people without a trial or access to lawyer, you have a very high chance of arresting innocent people. Some may be terrorists, but there are plenty who just there at the wrong place at the wrong time.
At the very least, there should be more accountability about what is going on at Gitmo.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Ifills book was in the works before she was picked to be the moderator for the debate
both campaigns have to agree on the moderator
so either, the mccain camp didnt do their homework (like the palin pick) or they didnt see any significant reason to not object to her as a moderator for this debate
there you have it

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Palin is a very likable person. The more the extreme left wing democrats lie and distort her views the more i like her and the more republicans will come out to vote for her.

Posted by: Just | October 1, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

also ifills book would be written were obama to win or not, this is a huge significant time in politics for us

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Trashing the moderator will not make Palin prepared. Ifill is a respected professional. She was selected by the debate commission and approved by both campaigns. If nonsense talk is all you have, then I understand why McCain is falling behind by a larger margin each day.

Posted by: GOP Excuses Already | October 1, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

just
palin is scary she obviously knows zero about the world
she knows about alaska and thats it, she should have stayed in alaska
this vp could be running the white house
and i know nothing more scary other than maybe one of the bloggers on here running hte country

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Asking Palin about what newspapers she reads is like giving her a pop quiz, WHAT ? You can’t be seriuos! That is one of the simpliest questions Ms. Palin has been asked so far. There is a story out there, that was an AP report and it stated, Palins husband and Palin herself, were part of a group that wanted to seperate from the United States of America and be their own free small little country. While, I am always reluctant to believe certain stories, there were many parts of this story that made it believable, because of the people that were interviewed for the story. Seems as though Todd is anti government and anti USA and did not want to be an American citizen anymore. Food for thought people. I have sent the article to CNN to see if they would be interested in checking it out.

Posted by: Tammy | October 1, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

“I don’t fight it, I invite it”…yeah, like she told the Alaska investigating team to “hold her accountable, I will cooperate”…
She seems to say one thing–to sound good–and then turns around and in action, does something else–not cooperate. I can just see how she invites the media, and then will blame them. She really has only herself to blame, and John McCain for putting her in her position. He’s got it figured out, if he loses, he can blame it on Palin! He doesn’t seem to care who takes the blame as long as it is not him. If he loses, he will finally admit that she was not qualified and brought him down. I can’t wait for that day!
I do feel bad for Palin, she is like a child who wants to please. But she is an adult, and should act as such. Can’t name what newspapers or magazines she reads? Probably doesn’t read anything, judging by her knowlegde on what’s going on in the world. Will read whatever is put in front of her? Tells us she is not the one seeking to learn, curious to know, but rather she has to browse through what’s handed to her that’s why she can’t even say the name of one publication, she doesn’t know them!
Even a Joe Sixpack can communicate better than she does, she is NOT EVEN QUALIFIED to call herself a Joe Sixpack!
Please, America, realize who you are putting in office. Just because you understand what she says, doesn’t mean she is saying anything good at all. Look at Bush, people voted for him because they could relate to him, one of us, well, look what happens when you put a dumb person in office. Let’s not repeat the same mistake a 3rd time!
Nothing against dumb people, just don’t want them running this country!
Enough is enough!

Posted by: all4Obama | October 1, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

ACORN’s Senator
By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:20 PM PT
Election ’08: Barack Obama wasn’t just the second-largest recipient of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac political contributions. He was also the senator from ACORN, the activist leader for risky “affirmative action” loans.

Posted by: Jackson in NC | October 1, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

This is very simple… Palin is just a MORON!

Posted by: NB | October 1, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

How does ANYONE defend Palin as a VP candidate at this point? Seriously.
Aside from reading one sarcastic speech, and shoveling out misleading information about herself out at the convention, what has she shown us?
We know she can see Russia. Uh, ok.
She was a mayor of a town of 6000. My daughter’s high school has almost 4000. And as mayor of that town, she had to hire an administrator to run the day-to-day operations for her.
As mayor of Wasala, she took a solvent town and ran it millions into debt by the time she left.
As mayor, Wasala became the crystal meth capital of Alaska
As mayor, Palin supported charging women for rape kits in Wasala. That’s Palin’s version of fiscal responsibility.
As governor, Palin requested more ear marks per capita than any governor in the US. More per capita than Obama – and McCain criticized him?
The state of Alaska has only 650,000 people, has very little ethnic diversity, and has the advantage of getting huge sums of revenue from the oil industry. The mayor of Indianapolis governs over more people and has more fiscal and social issues to deal with than she does as governor.
She has waffled in every interview and is afraid to talk to Americans openly.
I work with many intellegent, sharp, and powerful women…and all of them would be more qualified to lead our country than Gov Palin.
So why is she being perceived as something she’s not by Republican supporters?

Posted by: Now that the hype is over | October 1, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Typical Palin.
In debate’s, she does the following…
1) She will ignore the question and instead talk about small town Alaska. In fact, she will put down Washington.
2) Never give a specific answer to anything.
Palin has never lost a debate.
Biden has lost every presidential debate he’s been in.
After the debate, watch for McCain to be leading in all the polls.

Posted by: Dan | October 1, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Palin is a very likable person
============================
That’s why you vote? That is the exact thing that was said about Bush.
The check out girl at my grocery store is a “likeable” person as well. But I sure don’t want her to be next in line to the President of the United States!
I guess you’d think that’s a good idea though. I’ll ask her if she’s interested. She’s probably smarter than Palin at least.

Posted by: You've got to be kidding | October 1, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Sarah Palin has become a caricature of herself. She IS a cartoon!
It is almost beyond comprehension how ANYONE can take this woman seriously.
Columnist Kathleen Parker, who normally leans to the right, has suggested that Palin should withdraw from the race and give McCain a second chance to get it right.
That’s a WONDERFUL idea!

Posted by: Rhys | October 1, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Reading is not a class issue. Palin is simply not ready to be second in command.

Posted by: Reading is Fundamental | October 1, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

When I was more involved in politics, I too “read them all”. I’d been easier to tell you what I didn’t read.
However, if I were gov. of a state, local media would probably dominate 90 percent of the media I read of listened to. And the VAST majority of my time would be to the service of my constituents; NOT to the country as a whole (national socialism, er, I mean “shared responsibility), or to the world as a whole (global socialism. eg Global Poverty Tax).
OMT. Thanks for the “heads up” on Ifill, Katmandu (Oct 1, 2008 8:26:27 AM). It’s no wonder the MSM is hemmorraging readers, viewers, and money.

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

also ifills book would be written were obama to win or not, this is a huge significant time in politics for us
Ifill stands to gain financially should Obama win. That means a financial interest (on top of her obvious political/ideological interest).
Of course, lockstep partisans don’t see it. They’re lockstep partisans, willing to carry the water for their cause.

Posted by: RW | October 1, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

In three recent Governor’s elections in Kansas, women candidates were attacked and belittled by their male opponents.
Voters responded accordingly and elected the women candidates in all three elections.
Knowing the vitriole and sarcasm exhibited in past performanced of Joe Biden, it will be interesting to see if he is able to curb his nastiness when debating Sarah Palin.
Or, maybe Joe Biden should try to get a “deferment” from the debate to avoid any potential misstep this close to the election.
After all, deferments worked for him 5 times during Viet Nam.

Posted by: Jayhawk | October 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Katie Couric: And when it comes to establishing your worldview, I was curious: what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this to stay informed and to understand the world?
———-
I didn’t love Palin’s answer, but that is a tremendously condescending way to ask a question. To establish your worldview? To understand the world?
Come on, Couric is implying that Palin must be a rube, sequestered up there in Alaska. People from New York do that all the time. I don’t blame Palin for getting defensive about Alaska not being a foreign country.

Posted by: MayBee | October 1, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Sorry about the double post and the typos. Not enough coffee:)
Also, I think this is funny. Obama supporters here claiming that Gov Palin isn’t “qualified” to be president.
That’s right. Obama.
Too funny.

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I get most of my info about world affairs from the newspapers. Surely she has time to do that when she gets her coffee every morning? She doesn’t have to be reading Newsweek or what.
At least the PAPERS?

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

North Korea calls itself the Democratic Republic of Korea. Are they democratic?
They can call themselves what they like, but the style of governance is considered fascism in Nazi Germany.
I am very aware that the extreme left can produce dictators too. China is an example. Myanmar claims to be a socialist country too- and look at the balance of power there. The Soviet Union for example.
What I’m stating is Obama doesn’t preach any sort of radical ideology that Hitler did. He himself would have been considered an undesirable.
America’s standing has been dragged through the mud because of the Bush admin’s foreign policy- the shoot first talk later kind of foreign policy the int’l community hates and McCain would continue. Obama represents a breakaway from all of that, and his soaring oratory has made him an inspiration to people,that’s all.

Posted by: Grey Matter | October 1, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Couric asked how she formed her world view because ANYONE who is politically literate formed their view somehow.
Biden, McCain and Obama all have done serious work on the national and international level.
Palin has not.
It’s a valid question.
If she were an honest interviewee, she could have said she formed her views from TV news and by looking at Time and People in the doctor’s office waiting room.
Perhaps she was trying to hide the fact that she got her political world view from religious publications, or that she doesn’t have a political world view because she never thought about it much.

Posted by: Danny | October 1, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

There’s nothing condescending about the question if you actually read newspapers. Calling it condescending assumes she doesn’t read anything, with the implication that it’s in fact good not to read anything (maybe reading is considered elitist in some parts). And Katie the elitist is out to rub it in. So go suit yourself.

Posted by: rogerthomas | October 1, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

There’s an interesting current at play that I think the MSM is missing. The presidency & congress (as well as most companies and law firms and yes Wall Street) have been populated by knowledgeable “went to Harvard/Yale/Princeton read the WSJ/FT/NYT watch CNN/CSpan” types – who by and large have gotten it wrong … in the sense of performing the way Americans want them to perform. So why use that as some baseline foroffice?

Posted by: highed | October 1, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Greymatter,
“I get most of my info about world affairs from the newspapers.”
Let me guess…Democrat?

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

the book deal is simple
ifills book was announced before she was chosen as a moderator
the campaigns must agree on the moderator of any debate
so, either
the mccain camp didnt do any research at all, or they didnt see a significant problem with her as the moderator
the fact that they claim they didnt know now, should show you how incompetent the mccain camp is

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

The McCain camp is claiming it didn’t know about Gwen Ifill’s book prior to agreeing to her as moderator for the VP debate:
I confirmed for us here on GretaWire: the McCain campaign did NOT know about Gwen Ifill’s book (I think I told them when I made my efforts – emails about midnight – to find out!) I am stunned….the campaign (actually both) should have been told before the campaign agreed to have her moderate. It simply is not fair – in law, this would create a mistrial.
If that’s true, it just shows the McCain campaign’s incompetence. The debate moderators were agreed to on August 6. Ifill’s book was reported in the Associated Press two weeks earlier:
“We have an awkward history about how to talk about race in the nation and in newsrooms,” says Gwen Ifill, senior correspondent for PBS’ “The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer” and author of “The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama,” slated for publication early next year.
Of course, when you have Drudge on your side the facts don’t matter much.

Posted by: Bhrandon | October 1, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

This was a perfectly legitimate question to shed some insight onto where her views come from, and by whom have her opinions/positions been biased or shaded. Had she answered People magazine, the local news, and USA today, we’d be able to conclude that she is heavily influnced by mainstream, popular culture media. Had she answered The New Republic, New York Times, and Huffington Post we could conclude her influences are left leaning/liberal. If she answered Rush Limbaugh talk radio, Fox News, and US News and World Report, we’d be able to ascertain that her views are skewed to the right based on the conservatively biased sources she relies on for her information. If she truly read them all, she could have given a selection from each of the three areas (left, middle, right) and would have been able to offer some sort of evidence that she is well-read and open to dissenting opinions, and has thus shaped her own views based upon her understanding of all the positions. Her answer was ridiculous, and was paramount to taking the “fifth”.

Posted by: Amy T | October 1, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

BTW, Bhrandon, nice cut n’ paste from huffpo. That tells us all we need to know…….

Posted by: RW | October 1, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Palin whined about gotcha jouralism, “…so much has changed since I received my education in journalistic ethics all those years ago. But I’m not going to pick a fight with those who buy ink by the barrelful. I’m going to take those shots and those pop quizzes and just say that’s okay, those are good testing grounds. And they can continue on in that mode. That’s good. That makes somebody work even harder. It makes somebody be even clearer and more articulate in their positions. So really I don’t fight it. I invite it.”
Zinger 1: What nespapers and magazines did you read?
Ouch, what a shot!
Zinger 2: What did you read specifically?
Ugh, what is this, a pop quiz?
Zinger 3: Can you name a few?
Oof, how unethical!

Posted by: Rudy | October 1, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

We have a President who’s proud of the fact that he doesn’t read newspapers or magazines. What’s the big deal?

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 1, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Who watches Fox News?
Their viewers had McCain winning the first debate 82 percent to Obama’s 16 percent.
Fair & Balanced.

Posted by: Rudy | October 1, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Bhrandon
You’re right. I can’t believe that the McCain campaign doesn’t pay attention to every leftist pronouncement that some Obama sycophant has written a new book…or that they’d ignore your emails.
That’s the proof that McCain isn’t ready to be president?
Are you allowed to vote?

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

BrooklynDem,
“We have a President who’s proud of the fact that he doesn’t read newspapers or magazines. What’s the big deal?”
My thoughts exactly! Liberals feel, conservatives think. So long as liberals make decisions based on the way they feel, rather than reasoned analysis, there is really no reason to waste time trying to gain insight by reading or watching the MSM.
For example: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were created to assuage liberal guilt (emotion). When Republicans tried to regulate fm/fm (S190 for example), guilty liberals circled the wagons around other guilty liberals (Raines, Johnson) to cover the looting of the GSE’s.
The MSM, still to this day, hasn’t made a big deal about the fact that the looters of FM/FM are on the messiah’s campaign. And they still haven’t placed any blame on the defenders (guilty white liberal Democrats and the Congressional Black Caucus) of giving loans to people with no money.
Another thing, no Republican could ever get away with having a mentor like Frank Marshall Davis, a minister like Jeremiah Wright, and a “business partner” like Bill Ayres. EVER!
The MSM are complicit in the fraud that is Obama and indeed, Democrats. Normal people are rejecting the MSM en masse. It just proves that Republicans are like everybody else.

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Yet, another PERFECT example of media bias. WHY in the world is what papers Palin reads front page news? Perhaps she didn’t want to single out any newspapers to seem unfair. Are you suggesting that she doesn’t read the news? Honestly, what rubbish!
And yet, you continue to ignore the HUGE issues of Obama’s involvement with ACORN, his thug tactics using tax funded police to suppress freedome of speech in Missouri, or “Obama youth” creepily being forced to sing songs about Obama. THAT is news.
You tell us, Mr. T, why should the public trust ABC, or the media, when you have clear ridiculous and obvious bias like this? What exactly are you afraid of, that would make you ignore such significant aspects of Obama?

Posted by: liberati | October 1, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Palin is a disgrace. She is pitiful. She overcompensates by being overconfident. She should quit the VP race and stop her fantasy and go back to Alaska.

Posted by: SARAH | October 1, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

We do not know Gov. Palin.She has not been before the American public long enough to be considered for the vice presidency.People want to compare her to Senator Obama.He has been under public vetting and interaction on a national scale for about two years now.If all of you people want to get upset because she was asked what publications she reads…This is just a dumb defense of something that is indefendable.The woman may be president.I mean did Katie ask about that probe into that investigation against her.Katie should.Why in the world people want to treat a possible law maker like a beauty queen I never know.Bottom line is Palin needs to be asked all the hard questions just like Obama,McCain and Biden have and will.This election is not a game, hockey or anything like it.

Posted by: TV | October 1, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Palin stated that even though she only just got a passport, she got her “world views” from reading all these materials that were available to her. So the next logical question is, what did you read?
Everyone’s views are formulated by their experiences. You all know the saying, once bitten twice shy. What we are shy about what we experienced.
So Palin said to Couric that she did not go to Europe like other kids. She worked and learned about the world by reading.
So then tell us what you read. It is not a gotcha question or a biased question. Palin by her prior answers set herself up for this question.
She is running for VP here folks, not student council. She placed herself in this position. If she were to be VP, she will get asked much tougher questions and by people whom as she said, “hate our freedoms” and what will she do, bat her eyelashes and say, “very clever, but that’s a gotcha question, I’ll have to get back to ya.”
Please. The woman cannot put a sentece together. She speaks in glaring generalities and her answers are non sequitors.
Finally, I thought reading was fundamental. Heck all of you here can point to this site as to where you get your news. Palin could not point to one single publication, not even the Anchorage Daily. Tragic.
But, go ahead, let Joe Six-pack who has never even been to that little island from where she can see Russia be part of running this country. That is exactly what we need, a pretty face that lacks in any substance to lead us in these difficult times. Great.

Posted by: Not condesending | October 1, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

“Yet, another PERFECT example of media bias. WHY in the world is what papers Palin reads front page news?”
One of what 8 blog posts in a day is front page news?
Always go to see a right winger get themselves up in a lather over nothing.

Posted by: Ryan C | October 1, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Let the media question Obama’s claim on foreign experience. His claims are
1. He grew up Indonesia.( as a child).
2. Visited Pakistan when he was young Muslim.
Nobody questions that.

Posted by: sel | October 1, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Oh, good grief. She gives an interview that is much smoother and more solid than her previous ones, and none of you media folks are talking about her answers on abortion, gay rights, evolution, etc.– answers that show that she is NOT the far right nut bar media wish to spin her as. I have to wonder about the questions that elicited these answers of course– reminiscent of the infamous Kitty Dukakis question from a long-ago debate (don’t want ya’ll to think I only defend Republicans. *G*), Couric asked an inflammatory question related to abortion. She didn’t ask “So, are there any exceptions to your belief that abortion is morally wrong?” Instead she challenged, “So, if a fifteen year old girl is the victim of rape or incest, you still think she should not have an abortion?” (I may not have the wording exactly right, but that’s the basis of her question.) She immediately followed up with a question about the morning after pill. Somehow not the phrasing of questions she tossed to Joe Biden last week. She wasn’t challenging him constantly, asking him to defend his statements that a drunk driver killed his wife and daughter when the driver was not under the influence. That would have been tacky, I agree, but so were the questions she was presenting to Palin and that didn’t slow her down a bit.
Anyway, today, rather than a post on the subject of, “Hey, remember all those silly rumors about Palin being a hard-core strict creationist, complete with silly ideas about the devil and dinosaurs? Remember how so many folks fell for that, including Matt Damon and other Hollywood types who lambasted her for views she never even held? Well, last night’s interview should put those rumors to rest, as she presented a perfectly normal, perfectly reasonable support for teaching evolution in school and talked specifically about keeping faith out of the science classroom, as her father the science teacher always did.” I didn’t see that post here, Mr. Tapper. I remember people rushing to knock down persistent false rumors about Obama, from Muslim faith to fishy birth certificates. So why not defend Gov. Palin from the kook rumors as well?
No, we’d rather focus on the one awkward moment in the interview, when she declined to get specific about her reading matter. Know what? At that point in the interview, after all the questions Katy Couric has posed to her over the past week, I think I would have blown my top in Palin’s shoes. I would have withered her by asking if Katy planned to ask Joe Biden about his choice of news sources, or Obama, or even McCain. We all know how ridiculous it would have sounded for Katy to ask such a question of these men. Yet, no one questions why on earth she was quizzing Palin about it. Palin is quite within her rights to wonder what the catch is, where the gotcha is hiding, and thus wisely declining to get specific. Does Katy really think Palin has never read a major newspaper? Do you? Get serious. Stop being so insulting.

Posted by: moderate | October 1, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I think perhaps Michelle Obama spoke too quickly when she said she is proud of her country(men). I guess she had not met this one yet. Governor Palin may be the next one, after she drinks her six-pack, to vomit on the Prime Minister of Japan. John McCain did work with President Reagan but is Alzheimer’s catching?

Posted by: sybil30 | October 1, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

militarymom: You know after reading most of your posts I’m becoming very suspicious of you. I’m beginning to wonder WHAT MILITARY are you associated with. I’m starting to think things like the PLO, HAMMAS, ALQUIDA, IRANIAN REVOLUTIONARY GUARD, etc. Could you help us out a little bit and be a little more spicific, hhmmmmmm?

Posted by: bombem | October 1, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Gov Palin is a joke. That said has any one counted when she is asked a question that you get a valid Answer; or do you get a dance. Here when asked what she reads she could not name one, does she have a STM {Short Term Memory} problem, I do not think so.
Facts are facts, and she keeps digging a deeper hole. Digging away from proving she knows the fact: Or anything.

Posted by: Ranger Phx | October 1, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

POLITICAL PUNCH By: Jack Tapper is my number one read every day. I make it a point to read every one, often commenting on at least one. Further go on and post tem to: Mixx, Digg & Twitter; when I without exception post a comment.
Thank you Mr Tapper keep up the great work and I look forward to reading you again tomorrow.

Posted by: Ranger Phx | October 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

To all those who believe it is appropriate to have Gwen Ifil (author of a pro-Obama book) “moderate” Thursday’s VP debate I have a proposal.
Let’s appoint David Freddoso (author of another Obama book) as the moderator to the October 7th debate.
I’m sure Mr Freddeso can pose the insightful questions the media has refused to ask over the last 18 months.
Then, and only then, can we begin to even consider the possibility that Obama has been “fully vetted.”
And in Thursday’s VP debate, let’s talk about Biden’s and Palin’s actual accomplishments rather than who they know and how long they’ve keep their seat warm.

Posted by: russ | October 1, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

So what level of specificity are you after, Jake? You actually expected Sarah Palin to say exactly what sources of news she uses? As someone else noted below, would you ask that of Barack Obama? No, you would assume that he peruses the usual suspects, like the New York Times and the Washington Post. But that would not be an interesting thing to ask him. So why ask Sarah Palin? Well, to insult her, it seems to me. She says she reads broadly and I believe her. Katy Couric clearly did not, and neither do you. How strange. If the questions had been brought up some different way, in some less confrontational, less condescending way, I think Ms. Couric would have gotten a much different answer. Why not ask, for example, “Alaska is pretty remote from the lower 48 states. Do you have ready access to the New York Times there, for example? Do you read it in print, online, or do you ignore it entirely?” Pose the questions as if you expect an intelligent, positive answer and maybe you’ll get one. Pose the questions as if you are trying to shine a spotlight on what you have decided is someone’s ignorance and you will meet resistance. Get Real.

Posted by: GetReal | October 1, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Right on, moderate! The bias media tries to paint Sarah as a far right fanatic. But she explained herself beautifully to that rude pushy Katie Couric. She would counsel a child who was the victim of rape to choose life. The product of that horrific horrific situation could then go on to be adopted into a loving home and everybody wins! The choice should always be life. But, she would allow for abortion if the mothers life was in danger. If Sarah was a far right winger like the haters say, she would let the woman die! And even though Sarah would like abortion to be illegal, she wouldn’t even put women behind bars for having abortions! She knows the meaning of forgiveness. But haters refuse to see that. God bless you, Sarah.

Posted by: Pubby | October 1, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

I see above wherein readers claim that they don’t know Sara Palin . . . and then make insulting comments that absolutely prove they don’t.
Question: Do you guys really want to get to know the candidates, truly?
That’s easy. Evaluate them on their accomplishments, not the words.
At the upcoming debates ask them to reveal their greatest accomplishments while in office?
And by accomplishment, I do not mean what title they’ve achieved, but what they’ve actually done.
Being Chairman of a Senate committee for the last twenty years is of little importance if you’ve just been warming a seat. What have you actually accomplished?
The specific accomplishments a candidate is most proud of provide true insight into their highest priorities, thinking, governing philosophy, ability to work with others, and so much more.
Don’t snake-oil me with platitudes, hopes, and dreams. Give me something I can really sink my teeth into: real accomplishments. Money talks, bull**it walks. You know, I’m precisely lookin’ for “where the rubber meets the road” kinda stuff.
If ABC’s Charlie Gibson and CBS’s Katie Couric are going to hold themselves out as true journalists then why did they not ask Gov Palin a single question about her accomplishments? Perhaps its because she isn’t their preferred candidate? Okay, I can understand that; but shouldn’t they have disqualified themselves from participating in the interview then? I mean, that what a real professional would do.

Posted by: russ | October 1, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

No Republican could ever get away with having a mentor like Frank Marshall Davis, a minister like Jeremiah Wright, “business partners” like Bill Ayres and Tony Rezko, have the looters of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on their campaign team, and still be a viable candidate. EVER!
If Obama were a Republican with this kind of STINK around him, the Democrats could nominate the corpse of Jeffery Dahmer and still win.
Journalism is dead.
PS: Ifill MUST be replaced. MUST!

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

OMT, I had a politically diverse group of folks over for dinner this weekend.
NONE of the liberals or “moderates” knew of Rezko, Ayres, Johnson, Raines, or Frank Marshall Davis till I told them. You should have seen the look on their faces. It was like I just kicked them in the gut.
Nearly all of the conservatives knew. They’d all heard of Wright.
I’ve talked three people this week into cancelling their subscriptions to their local socialist rags. Two cancelled their Wichita Eagle-Beacon subscriptions, and one Denver Post. I will work to see both newspapers declare bankruptcy in my lifetime.

Posted by: The Plumber | October 1, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I like to think I’m pretty open to most of what’s been going on- I can admit that Biden frequently says stupid things and recognize when Palin is painfully repeating the same talking points as answers to different questions. But reading that transcript, all I could think was, “Really Katie? With all that’s going on in the world and America today, of all the relevant things that you could try to catch her off guard with, you decide that it’s a matter of essential importance that we know what periodicals Sarah Palin may or may not read?” Great journalism, really top notch.

Posted by: rory | October 1, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Exactly, Russ. Enough with gotcha journalism. Sarah’s accomplishments while in office are part of her biography & resume, and she might even know them by heart already. She would come across as able and confident and knowledgable. But the bias media keep shooting zingers at her instead, just hoping to trip her up on camera. Enough already! Start asking some hardball questions with Biden and Obama! Start off with what newspapers and magazines they read!

Posted by: Pubby | October 1, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

“I will work to see both newspapers declare bankruptcy in my lifetime.”
From the same group that screams about censorship

Posted by: Ryan C | October 1, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

“No Republican could ever get away with having a … minister like Jeremiah Wright”
Funny you should mention that just when Palin seems to be denying her membership in her church. Looks like she is getting away with the fact that she sits in church listening to anti-semetic rants.

Posted by: Mike | October 1, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

It is a myth Obama has been “Vetted”..ask him some gotcha questions. The media just coos up to him, and then turn around and ask Palin questions from the AP American history test. I don’t care what she knows, I care about her character..who she is. Obama went to Rev Wrights church for 20 years..thats what kind of guy he is.

Posted by: bosco5021 | October 1, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Christmas must have come early for the Democrates.And the gift is…….Sarah Palin.

Posted by: mebeingme | October 2, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Bosco,
Wanna know when the messiah gets caught without a prepared answer?
He say’s things like, “I’m not opposed to nuclear waste.”
Mike
You know I’m right. You bring up Gov. Palins church but ignore Sen Obama’s. Is that all you got?
Ryan C
Censorship? These two newspapers have done no investigative journalism into Wright, Davis, Raines, Johnson,…
Sen Biden said the other day that President FDR went on television in 1929 when the market crashed. Problem: FDR wasn’t president and tv didn’t exist.
None of my lib friends knew of this gaffe till I told them. But there is no doubt that if Gov Palin had made this kind of error it’d led every news broadcast and been above-the-fold for three days, at least.
Their silence indicates their bias. They have no credibility. Journalism is dead.

Posted by: The Plumber | October 2, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Speaking of wacky clerics, Palin hasn’t distanced herself from the witch-hunting pastor Thomas Muthee. In fact, she credited him for her election as governor. “As I was mayor and Pastor Muthee was here and he was praying over me… He said ‘Lord make a way and let her do this next step.’ And that’s exactly what happened.”
I wonder if Muthee has been called in for another witchcraft-rebuking prayer session with Palin for the step up to VP.

Posted by: Rudy | October 2, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Quite a few of you morons would support steak sandwich if it was the VP Nominee for the Republican Party. McCain has known for quite a while that Ifill was the moderator, but now that you have an unprepared candidate, you blame the refs before they play the game! You’ve been brainwashed from so many years of right-wing talk radio that you haven’t even noticed what an abject failure the last seven years ago. Shame on you for wanting Joe Six-Pack to run the land-it’s that type of thinking (or lack of) that is rapidly turning the U.S. into a third world country. Keep in mind that the office of the VP has been elevated substantially under Cheney/Bush-the vice-president helps to set policy. Seriously, Palin may have more “executive experience”, but how relative it to the position she is vying for? I mean, W had oodles “executive experience”-how’s that working out for his presidency? Palin NEVER CONSIDERED being president or vice-president, which means that she has NO PLAN. So, let’s talk about who’s better PREPARED, who’s more level-headed in these troubled times, and who can formulate plans to help reverse our current course. In this election, the candidates are NOT evenly matched. I take my vote seriously, and I hope that all of you will, too.

Posted by: independent but thinking | October 2, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

To Palin fans in general:
Her comment that Joe SixPack is “finally” being represented in the vice-presidency means that she DOES NOT know her history! Apparently the names Harry S Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard M. Nixon, and Gerald R. Ford (all from poor or lower-middle class backgrounds) don’t ring a bell with her… and those are just late 20th-century V-Ps.
To bosco5021:
Honey, those aren’t US History AP questions by a long shot! I teach a “regular”-level US history class and I know my students could have aced them. Speaking of my students, here is the best quote ever from one of them (a 16-year-old girl): “Palin would be great as one of my friend’s moms, but she is NOT ready to be vice-president!”
Amen, my child!!

Posted by: Denise | October 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

One more comment for defenders of Palin:
Please explain to me why Palin is a better choice to potentially be President of the United States than EACH of the following people. The terms “maverick” and “reformer” and any related terms may not be used without specific, irrefutable examples. You may NOT fall back on the tired old argument that Obama isn’t experienced, either.
Here is your list:
Tom Ridge (former head of Homeland Security)
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Con)
If the candidate had to be female:
Dr. Condoleezza Rice (Sec. of State)
Sen. Olympia Snowe (R -Maine)
Sen. Susan Collins (R – Maine)
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R – Texas)
Fr. Gov Christine Todd Whitman (past New Jersey governor and former EPA secretary)
That’s just my preliminary list. When you finish explaining away these choices, there are more.
I’ll wait for your response.

Posted by: Denise | October 5, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.