Palin Touts ‘Tito the Builder’

Sick and tired of this BS yet?

Next will be John The Rejected Presidential Candidate.

I bet the next person they trot out is “John the Baptist.”

MY FRIENDS,
November 4th 2008 will be upon us soon and before the day is over we will have made history in these United States; we will have had the privilege of voting for Barack Obama, our next President.
How nice will it be not seeing another commercial or having to listen to Diva Sarah shooting from the hip. I see that the lips are moving but I can’t understand what the hell she is talking about.
To November 5th, 2008!

My friends, here is THE QUESTION JOHN MCCAIN FEARS:
Sen. McCain, are you today willing to come out against all forms of ‘redistributing the wealth’, including:
A) the progressive tax code
B) Social Security
C) Medicare
D) unemployment insurance
E) all local property taxes
F) all local sales taxes
FOLLOW UP QUESTION:
Are you, John McCain, a socialist, or merely a demagogue for pretending that your opponent is more of a socialist than you?

Hey watcher,a little early to go poping the cork.He has not won yet and most likely will not.

Oh yes un-concerned un-american,we will be very proud of the United States of America.Unfortunatly if Barack Hussien Obama II is elected it will cease to exist.Replaced by the ASPR,American Soviet Peoples Republic.

Joe was a fake, Tito probably is too. No problem – its all prep for her next campaign in 2012. Palin is already planning to run the Skinhead, gun-crazy Rapturist, Limbaugh-loving remnants of the Republican Party. Rats leaving a sinking ship.

Ohhhhh,broad hateful insults.Really mature Dumba–.

When I first saw Sarah Palin at the convention I thought she was outstanding but the more I see of her the sicker I get. If I never hear the words, Joe the Plumber, Tito the Builder, Sarah the joke or John the Looser “in that high pitched squeaky voice” again it will be too soon.

Hey Lanny,are you a Obama supporter?

Davis,you are a Liberal Jacka–,you are the reason the democratic party symbol is the donkey.And BTW,she is a whole helluva lot smarter than Biden.He has told a paralyzed man to stand up,has hinted that Hussien will reinstate the draft amongst other things.And an elephant is one of the smartest things on earth,guess you never thought of that before you pitted her against two rats.

Latrine Cleaner – I am for what is best for this country and the future of my grandchildren. I am hopeful they have as good or better life than myself. I don’t see those things happening in an administration that wants to stay in Iraq for a hundred more years. An administration that wants to give more to the rich and maybe they will trickle a little down to the middle class. An administration that will be run exactly like it has been run for the last eight years. I don’t dislike the grand old party and agree with it in principal but when they run an air head like Palin and an old man with an obvious diminished capacity to reason I am hopeful the other side has a better plan.

Sorry folks, that woman is a secessionist or at least she associates with them and/or supports them (it’s on video too). Better they bring back Clinton’s tax layout (which some of you call “socialism” – funny, I don’t remember us turning into the U.S.S.R. in the 90′s, the billionaires were still billionaires) than have some secessionist harpy in the White House who would have had one of the stars on the American flag ripped off. Look up the Alaska Independence Party on google.
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?

Sorry folks, that woman is a secessionist or at least she associates with them and/or supports them (it’s on video too). Better they bring back Clinton’s tax layout (which some of you call “socialism” – funny, I don’t remember us turning into the U.S.S.R. in the 90′s, the billionaires were still billionaires) than have some secessionist harpy in the White House who would have had one of the stars on the American flag ripped off. Look up the Alaska Independence Party on google.
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?

Sorry folks, that woman is a secessionist or at least she associates with them and/or supports them (it’s on video too). Better they bring back Clinton’s tax layout (which some of you call “socialism” – funny, I don’t remember us turning into the U.S.S.R. in the 90′s, the billionaires were still billionaires) than have some secessionist harpy in the White House who would have had one of the stars on the American flag ripped off. Look up the Alaska Independence Party on google.
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?

And DWS,the more you post that doesn’t make it more true.

You are defending ayers,who even OBAMA said was a terrorist.I feel very sorry for you and your total lack of knowledge,in conclusion I will leave you with a little wisdom;”The day the people think they can vote themselves more money,will be the end of the Republic.”
Obama for Latrine Cleaner ’08 out.

Obama brings out the worst in people & society, he really does.
For proof, just read the “blog bile” his supporters are saying about good hard working men like Joe & Tito on this website.
Or visit Obama supported blogs like the Daily Kos, the Huffington Post or the Democratic Underground……you really don’t get any uglier than those sites.
Again Obama brings out the worst in people and society.
Look at all of the people who support him: Ayers, Wright, Pfleger, Farrakan, Chavez,folks in the Iranian parliment, Hamas, Hezbollah, Odinga, the Chavez brothers…..all anti-American folks and/or dictators.
Obama hasn’t brought change or hope to anything or anyone….ever.
If he’s elected, I predict that he will be one of the worst POTUS ever.

Maybe she should introduce CNN, ABC, and TIME and shut them up.

Posted by: sheryl | Oct 28, 2008 4:21:56 AM
Yes you can get uglier Fox, Drudge,Newsmax,Hannity,Limbaugh. Just to name a few.
Are we consulting crytal balls now with our predictions?

In no way, shape or form am I condoning what Ayers and his group did. If we use the Republican logic then everybody that John McCain has ties with, he must agree with. G. Gordon Liddy for example. Telling people on his radio show how to kill ATF agaents. Using targets called Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Go to politifact and put in ayers. There are several things on that about it.
Again, what Ayers did was despicable but to try and tie Obama to it is absurd. That is like you working with somebody that has done something like that. Does that make you a terrorist? NO.

“Yes you can get uglier Fox, Drudge,Newsmax,Hannity,Limbaugh. Just to name a few.”
This statment can only be written by someone who doesn’t read or watch FOX, Drudge, etc and who is intellectually dishonest.
BTW, calling Obama a socialist isn’t a smear. Obama told a reporter that he was happy with his “spread the wealth around” comment to Joe.

“Again, what Ayers did was despicable but to try and tie Obama to it is absurd.”
Nobody tried to tie Obama to Ayers, Obama is tied to Ayers because he chose to be.
The fact is that Ayers isn’t just someone who lived in Obama’s neighborhood. They’re political soulmates and have been for awhile.
Now you may be fine with Obama dissembling who he really is for the general election, but a lot of people aren’t comfortable with the amount of people Obama has had to distance himself from his past.
Also Ayers has some very bad ideas about education and prison reform that Obama has agreed with via either working with him on two boards, promoting his book on the subject and giving funds from IL taxpayers.

Now I know what I’m going to be for Halloween.
Anyone catch McStain on MTP? He could have used Tito’s help trying to remember the names of his neocon supporters. What a joke.

*** a lot of people aren’t comfortable
*** with the amount of people Obama has
*** had to distance himself from his
*** past.
and yet you are completely comfortable with past actions and associations of McCain which pale in comparison..
Typical hypocrite or too ignorant not to know you took the GOP bait hook line and sinker.

Update America:
Talk About Reaching Into The Grave
Obama supporters talk about Todd Palin’s association with a dead man, a man that was disenchanted with the corruption in Washington, D.C. during his lifetime. Joe Vogler supported America’s freedoms under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Joe Vogler (1913-1993) was the founder of the Alaskan Independence Party and active in politics, regularly running for public office in Alaska for many years. Vogler was born April 24, 1913, on a farm outside Barnes, Kansas. Joe Vogler attended the University of Kansas on a scholarship in 1929. He graduated with a law degree in five years and was admitted to the Kansas State Bar.
Obama’s Anti-American supporters are alive and kicking. Obama’s supporters point to destroying the American way. Obama points to China and he say China is an example we can follow. I guess Obama wants communism and the controlling of the entire population of America.
Here is something all Americans must look at:
http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm
Obama has a big rug under which he hides all the information about himself. John McCain and Sarah Palin do not hide any confrontations. John McCain and Sarah Palin do not have to hide their records of birth, passed associates, school records and personal records.
Obama knows he has many things to hide that he cannot explain. A person that FEARS the truth cannot be trusted with your country.
Obama’s religious leader says God Damn America. Obama you do NOT God Damn This Great Nation. You can God Damn the politicians that corrupt this great nation of the United States of America. God Damn you Mr. Wright for your God Damming statements about this great country the United States of America.
Obama, his terrorist friends and his corrupt friends that pocket taxpayers’ money need to learn that this great nation of The United States Of America does not need any of them. A vote for Obama is un-American.

Investors Flee From ‘Change’ Obama Hypes
By JACK KEMP AND PETER FERRARA |
Posted Monday, October 27, 2008 4:30 PM PT
Are Barack Obama’s proposed tax increases adversely affecting our financial markets? We say yes, unambiguously. The senator has done a masterful job distracting attention from his tax increases with his $500-per-worker tax credit supposedly for 95% of Americans.
Obama has also set forth more than half a dozen additional refundable income tax credits targeted to low- and moderate-income workers for child care, education, housing, welfare, retirement, health care and other social purposes.
These tax credits are devised to phase-out based on income, which will ultimately increase marginal income tax rates for middle-class workers. In other words, as you earn more, you suffer a penalty in the phase-out of these credits, which has the exact effect of a marginal tax rate increase. That harms, rather than improves, the economy.
With the bottom 40% of income earners not paying any federal income taxes, such tax credits would not reduce any tax liability for these workers. Instead, since they’re refundable, they would involve new checks from the federal government.
These are not tax cuts as Obama is promising. They are new government spending programs buried in the tax code and estimated to cost $1.3 trillion over 10 years.
Obama argues that while these workers do not pay income taxes, they do pay payroll taxes. True, but his planned credits do not involve cuts in payroll taxes. They are refundable income tax credits designed to redistribute income and “spread the wealth.”
Meantime, Obama has proposed effective tax increases of 20% or more in the two top income-tax rates, phasing out the personal exemptions and all itemized deductions for top earners, as well as raising their tax rates.
He wants a 33% increase in the tax rates on capital gains and dividends, an increase of 16% to 32% in the top payroll tax rate, reinstatement of the death tax with a 45% top rate, and a new payroll tax on employers estimated at 7% to help finance his health insurance plan. He’s also contending for higher tariffs under his protectionist policies.
Finally, he would increase corporate taxes by 25%, though American businesses already face the second-highest marginal tax rates in the industrialized world, thus directly harming manufacturing and job creation while weakening demand for the dollar.
Obama argues disingenuously that his tax increases would only affect higher-income workers and “corporate fat cats.” But it is precisely these top marginal tax rates that control incentives for savings, investment, entrepreneurship, business expansion, jobs and economic growth. While he wants to tax the rich, the burden will fall on the poor and the middle class.
In their new book, “The End of Prosperity,” Art Laffer, Steve Moore and Peter Tanous argue that the threat of this tax tsunami is already destabilizing our financial markets and causing capital flight from America.
They write, “Hot capital is escaping over the borders out of the United States and flowing into China, India, Europe, and even Japan. . . Starting in late 2007, foreigners started pulling their money out of the United States, and Americans started investing more abroad. Global investors are losing confidence in the U.S.”
The American economy was in shambles when Reagan entered office in 1981. Inflation had soared by 25% over the prior two years, unemployment was heading toward 10%, the prime interest rate hit 21%, poverty was on a 33% upswing and real family income had decreased by almost 10% due to the stagflation of the late 1970s.
Reagan cut the top income-tax rate from 70% to 50%, adopted an additional 25% across-the-board rate cut and sliced capital gains taxes in half. The 1986 tax reform left us with just two tax rates of 15% and 28%. Reagan slashed spending growth, lowered tariffs, reduced regulatory burdens and promoted anti-inflation monetary policies.
The result, the authors explain, was actually a 25-year, noninflationary economic boom, with only two brief, mild recessions in 1990 and 2001. “We call this period, 1982-2007, the 25-year boom — the greatest period of wealth creation in the history of the planet,” they write. “Adjusting for inflation, more wealth was created in America in the 25-year boom than in the previous 200 years.”
By 1989, the economy had grown by almost one-third, the equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany to our U.S. economy. In 1984 alone, real economic growth boomed by 6.8%, the highest in 50 years. Nearly 20 million new jobs were created in the 1980s, increasing U.S. civilian employment by almost 20%. Unemployment fell to 5.3% by 1989.
Spectacularly, inflation was slashed to 3.2% by 1983. The prime rate fell to 6.25% by 1992, even though opponents had argued that Reagan’s tax cuts would increase interest rates. Family income reversed its decline, poverty reversed its rise and tax revenues actually doubled.
This is the “Change We Need” today.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=309998514066924

Update America:
A look at Obama’s National Health Care Program that was tried in the United States and around the world.
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=4972
http://www.angelfire.com/pa/sergeman/issues/healthcare/socialized.html
Obama will use you, the Middle Class taxpayer, to test his misguided thoughts on how to run the United States. I hate to tell you Obama supporter’s that all his thoughts have been proven NOT to work to benefit the people.

Today’s flavor will be “Levi the High School Drop Out”

**
Obama will use you, the Middle Class taxpayer
**
Use me baby! Use me! Ain’t no way I’m putting up with 4 more years of a dumber Bush and more crap tax policies!

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is very critical of U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama’s positions on Iran, according to reports that have reached Israel’s government.
Sarkozy has made his criticisms only in closed forums in France. But according to a senior Israeli government source, the reports reaching Israel indicate that Sarkozy views the Democratic candidate’s stance on Iran as “utterly immature” and comprised of “formulations empty of all content.”
Obama visited Paris in July, and the Iranian issue was at the heart of his meeting with Sarkozy. At a joint press conference afterward, Obama urged Iran to accept the West’s proposal on its nuclear program, saying that Iran was creating a serious situation that endangered both Israel and the West. According to the reports reaching Israel, Sarkozy told Obama at that meeting that if the new American president elected in November changed his country’s policy toward Iran, that would be “very problematic.”

Update America:
Obama’s Hawaii Trips Cost More Than Palin’s Clothes
Sunday, October 26, 2008 3:21 PM
By: Ronald Kess
Barack Obama’s trips to Hawaii on a chartered Boeing 757 each cost more than twice the price of Sarah Palin’s new clothes.
Brad Blakeman, who was in charge of scheduling for President Bush, says a Boeing 757 costs about $20,000 an hour for fuel, crew, and maintenance. Since a trip to Hawaii entails 10 hours of flying time from Chicago, the total cost for each round-trip comes to about $400,000.
Obama used the Boeing 757 for trips to Hawaii over the summer for a vacation and again last week to see his failing grandmother. Admirable though that visit was, “By Obama using a private jet to go on a purely personal visit to see his grandma, he’s wasting not only energy, but he’s using the money that his supporters have given him for campaign purposes,” Blakeman says. “It’s a purely personal visit paid for with campaign funds.”
On the other hand, the media are highlighting the Republican National Committee’s purchase of $150,000 in clothes for Palin, even though the dresses will be donated to charities. The New York Times played the story on page one.
“They’re picking on Palin, who was provided a wardrobe by the RNC strictly for political purposes, and it was always intended that these garments would be then given to charity,” Blakeman says. “So there’s a benefit that’s going to charity, not a benefit that Palin will have after the election. There was a need for it because she’s a modest person who didn’t have an extensive wardrobe to do 24/7 campaigning.”
To pick on Palin without going after Obama’s plane trips is “an absolute journalistic abuse,” Blakeman says. “This is the same plane that he took to Hawaii when he went on vacation. In the summertime, when gas was soaring and Americans were having to pinch their pennies, this guy gets on his campaign plane and goes to Hawaii on vacation. He did a couple campaign stops in a state that is not a swing state and is a guaranteed win for Obama. That was clearly to cover the tracks of this vacation.”
Blakeman notes that at the height of the gasoline price surge, Obama suggested that Americans check their vehicle’s tire pressure as a way of conserving fuel.
“I wonder if he checked the tires on his jumbo jet before taking off for a purely personal visit?” Blakeman says. “The way he spends campaign money is a direct reflection of how he will spend ours. He could have easily flown commercial or taken a much smaller corporate aircraft that would cost a fraction of a 757.”
Ironically, it was Palin as governor who saved money for Alaskans by selling the state’s jet and instead flying commercial.
Kellyanne Conway, one of the most respected Republican pollsters, says the media’s attack on Palin’s clothes is an example of elitist snobbery or “classism.” Noting the media’s treatment of her, “I can’t believe her own family still approves of her, after the unprecedented, personal and relentless attacks that this woman has undergone,” Conway says.
Besides attacks on Palin over her clothes, Conway cites snide remarks about “the way she speaks, her husband’s lack of a college degree, the barefoot and pregnant 17-year-old daughter, you know who hunts moose anyway? The classism is so raw and unapologetic, so unconsidered and so undisguised.”
Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com.

Update America:
Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is “NOT” qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: – 10/25/08 – Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It’s a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, “I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com

Sarah / Tito:
1. How many American Citizens are employed by Tito’s “construction company”?
2. Can Tito prove that all of his employees are US Citizens or legally authorized to be in the US?
3. How many employees of Tito’s “construction company” reported pesonal income to the IRS in excess of $250,000?

***
Sarkozy fears Obama, because he knows the One will reward Iran’s drive for nuclear weapons.
***
Hmmm, not from the looks of things over at faux news..:
French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Barack Obama heaped praise on one another Friday, as they expressed a mutual commitment to fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan and keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of Iran.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/07/25/obama-to-keep-paris-visit-brief/

The latest directive from Our Dear Leader’s National Field Director, Jon Carson, instructs Cultists to take Election Day off and skip out of work and classes for The One.
The pursuit of “Higher Purpose” requires Obama followers to skip out of their jobs and play hooky from school — while others pick up the slack. Don’t sweat it, your Republican co-workers can cover for you while you work your holy mission.
Welcome to “redistributive change!”

Obama does not want to upset his DailyKos/MoveOn.org base.
Obama says that the United States should strike at al-Qaeda in Pakistan without the consent of the Pakistani government. So, he favors attacking al Qaeda in Pakistan, but presumably NOT in Syria, even though al Qaeda thrives in Syria not because of lawlessness (as in Pakistan) but because the group enjoys the hospitality of the Syrian government. Maybe if the Pakistani government began openly collaborating with al Qaeda, Obama would withdraw his support for military strikes.
If Obama was consistent, he would applaud the Syrian operation. His SILENCE on the matter indicates otherwise. You’d think there were a few curious journalists out there who might wish to get him ON THE RECORD about all of this.

Read about GOP hypocrisy and Palin:
http://www.vaboomer.com/the_portal_to_boomeranger/2008/10/gop-sexist-hypocracy-vis-palins-make-over.html

I want to hear about Bob the Builder.
Oh, wait. I can picture Bob now, saying: “can we build it? YES WE CAN!”
Hmmm. Guessing Palin doesn’t want to go there.

The question is, who is the better person for office?
After sifting through all the s–t, it is obvious,
McCain / Palin !!

Who cares about any of it?

In the midst of all the false rumor being spread against obama, pls take a little time to check out this story:
The Norwegian newspaper VG has reported a truly amazing story about a newly-wed trying to get to Norway to be with her husband, and the stranger who helped pay an unexpected luggage surcharge. The blog “Leisha’s Random Thoughts” has translated the story.
It was 1988, and Mary Andersen was at the Miami airport checking in for a long flight to Norway to be with her husband when the airline representative informed her that she wouldn’t be able to check her luggage without paying a 100 surcharge:
When it was finally Mary’s turn, she got the message that would crush her bubbling feeling of happiness.
-You’ll have to pay a 103 dollar surcharge if you want to bring both those suitcases to Norway, the man behind the counter said.
Mary had no money. Her new husband had travelled ahead of her to Norway, and she had no one else to call.
-I was completely desperate and tried to think which of my things I could manage without. But I had already made such a careful selection of my most prized possessions, says Mary.
As tears streamed down her face, she heard a “gentle and friendly voice” behind her saying, “That’s okay, I’ll pay for her.”
Mary turned around to see a tall man whom she had never seen before.
-He had a gentle and kind voice that was still firm and decisive. The first thing I thought was, Who is this man?
Although this happened 20 years ago, Mary still remembers the authority that radiated from the man.
-He was nicely dressed, fashionably dressed with brown leather shoes, a cotton shirt open at the throat and khaki pants, says Mary.
She was thrilled to be able to bring both her suitcases to Norway and assured the stranger that he would get his money back. The man wrote his name and address on a piece of paper that he gave to Mary. She thanked him repeatedly. When she finally walked off towards the security checkpoint, he waved goodbye to her.
Who was the man?
Barack Obama.
Twenty years later, she is thrilled that the friendly stranger at the airport may be the next President and has voted for him already and donated 100 dollars to his campaign:
-He was my knight in shining armor, says Mary, smiling.
She paid the 103 dollars back to Obama the day after she arrived in Norway. At that time he had just finished his job as a poorly paid community worker* in Chicago, and had started his law studies at prestigious Harvard university.
Mary even convinced her parents to vote for him:
In the spring of 2006 Mary’s parents had heard that Obama was considering a run for president, but that he had still not decided. They chose to write a letter in which they told him that he would receive their votes. At the same time, they thanked Obama for helping their daughter 18 years earlier.
And Obama replied:
In a letter to Mary’s parents dated May 4th, 2006 and stamped ‘United States Senate, Washington DC’, Barack Obama writes:
‘I want to thank you for the lovely things you wrote about me and for reminding me of what happened at Miami airport. I’m happy I could help back then, and I’m delighted to hear that your daughter is happy in Norway. Please send her my best wishes. Sincerely, Barack Obama, United States Senator’.
The parents sent the letter on to Mary.
Mary says that when her friends and associates talk about the election, especially when race relations is the heated subject, she relates the story of the kind man who helped out a stranger-in-need over twenty years ago, years before he had even thought about running for high office.
Truly a wonderful story, and something that needs to be passed along in the maelstorm of fear-and-smear politics we are being subjected to right now.
UPDATE: Thanks for the recommends, folks! Also, remember this was 1988, when 100 dollars was quite a bit of money, compared to today’s value.
By the way, this would be the perfect antidote to the Smear E-mails going around. If anyone has a good long email chain list, shoot it out, and let it be passed along.

http://hiphoprepublican.blogspot.com/

If only there was a party with common sense on all the issues and enough $$ to campaign….

Full suit war hawk war with iraq, war with iran, war with north korea, war with the country he has a score to settle with vietnam nice real nice I hope there are enough to go around we will need it.

Why do Republicans contue to use fear to get into office?If there is anything we should be afraid of is another 4 or 8 years of this kind of government.Try watching Fox News,Lord!!!the world is coming to an end it seems.Unlike Joe the plumber,who was very collective and laid back,This Tito guy was all over the place screaming at reporters something you normal see at McCain Campain and his “interview”
on Fox News man was it aimless!! the guy just wanted to make a name for himself.Tito managed to do so THUS the beauty of America and God bless it.However,Tito is just an angry guy withought a cause.

I will tax you at 110% of your earnings…it’s the patriotic thing to do.
Thank you, suckers!

Go Tito the Builder! Tito has good old common sense and knows what he’s talking about, unlike most Americans. Wake up out there and Vote McCain/Palin!!!!!

I am a white male who grew up in the 60′s & early 70′s and consider myself to be liberal in the social sense of the word. I have spent the last 40 years as an adult trying to judge people for who they are & not by the color of their skin and I have supported the rights of women to better their situation in life. At the age of 17 in 1969 I walked away from a church that voted to exclude blacks from attending church services. It took me about six months (not 20 years) to make this decision.
I was looking forward to voting for and supporting Hilary Clinton, who should have been the Democratic nominee for President. However, people inside the Democratic party decided to back another candidate, Barack Obama. Do I have a problem with Obama because he’s black? Absolutely not! Why can I not support Barack Obama? Because:
(1) He spent 20 years in as a member of a church where racial hatred is preached from the pulpit. I am diametrically opposed to racism, whatever the source.
(2) He has ties to Muslim extremists.
While it is everyone’s right to practice the religion of their choice, I personally can’t support anyone who has Muslim ties because of the Muslim treatmant of women and I expressly oppose Muslim extremists who believe they are ordained by Allah to force their religious beliefs on the rest of the world.
(3) Obama has many associations with less than respectable characters; however, when he is confronted on these assciations, he denies or downplays his involvement with these people because it is politically expedient to do so. If we have a national crisis and Obama is president, I fear he will wait to act until an opinion poll is done to find what the most popular course of action is.
(4) If Obama thinks his viewpoint is correct on “spreading the wealth around”
then why did the Democrats find it necessary to assassinate the character of “Joe the Plumber”? I guess Tito will be next.
Do I have much in common with the conservative Republican ideology?
Not a lot. However, I do know that John McCain and Sarah Palin have intregrity and will do their best to wash away the bulls..t out of government agencies and the Halls of Congress.