By Dschabner

Oct 25, 2008 7:22pm

Palin Warns Democrats Would Have ‘Unchecked Power’

ABC News’ Imtiyaz Delawala reports: At two rallies in Iowa today, Gov. Sarah Palin charged that a Barack Obama administration would usher in an era of “government as part of your family, taking care of us, making decisions for us,” while for the first time warning that Democrats would have "unchecked power" if they take control of both the White House and Congress.

“That philosophy of government taking more, which is a misuse of the power to tax — it leads to government moving into the role of taking care of you and government and politicians, and kind of moving in as the other half of your family to make decisions for you,” Palin said at a rally in Sioux City this morning.

“Now they do this in other countries where the people are not free. Government as part of the family, taking care of us, making decisions for us. I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me,” Palin added, referring to Democratic House Rep. Barney Frank, who is head of the powerful House Financial Services Committee.

Palin continued her economic argument against Obama by saying he would usher in a new “big government agenda,” while hinting at socialistic elements of shared property and investments in her remarks, prompting one man to yell out twice from the crowd “He’s a socialist!” as Palin spoke of Obama.

“See, under a big government agenda, what you thought was yours, your income your property, your inventory, your investments, really would belong to somebody else, to everybody else,” Palin said. “And it would be shared with everybody else.”

For the first time, Palin made an argument used recently by her running mate Sen. John McCain, warning about “unchecked power” of Democrats if they take control of both houses of Congress and the White House.

“Big government spenders, too, if you think about it, who would control the House, the Senate, the White House,” Palin said at an afternoon rally in Des Moines. “The power there, the monopoly of power is something that we need to be discussing in these last 10 days of this campaign.”

Palin continued the line of attack by telling the audience that lessons to their children about “work ethic and hard work being rewarded” would be eroded, as would “virtues of freedom and independence.”

“Think about how our children might grow up in a place with no checks and balances on the federal government, with big government spenders in charge of the House and Senate, and again heaven forbid, the White House,” Palin said in the gym of Sioux City West High School. “What we have taught our children in terms of lessons about work ethic and hard work being rewarded, those lessons would be eroded. The virtues of freedom and independence while still being compassionate and generous with others, I’m afraid that those lessons would be eroded.

“You can count on John McCain and I to know that we will be there to defend you and protect you and your savings and your investments and your families, not big government,” Palin added.

The two-city stop through Iowa was Palin’s first trip to the state since Sept. 18, when she held a joint rally with McCain in Cedar Rapids. McCain will make his fourth visit in five weeks to the state on Sunday, holding a rally in Cedar Falls. Current polls have the McCain-Palin ticket down by a dozen points in the state.

At the beginning of her remarks in Sioux City, Palin made light of the recent flap over the Republican National Committee’s purchase of $150,000 in clothing for Palin and her family, noting to the Iowa audience that she was wearing “my own jacket from Wasilla, Alaska.”

“It was nice and crisp getting off the airplane and coming into the — it reminded me a lot of Alaska so I put my warm jacket on, and it is my own jacket, it doesn’t belong to anybody else. My own jacket, from Wasilla, Alaska,” Palin said to laughs.

In Des Moines, Palin let her 7-year-old daughter take the mic to say hello to the Iowa supporters.

“Hi, Iowa,” Piper Palin said to the crowd. “My sister said hi, and my little brother said hi. And umm, don’t forget to vote for my mom,” drawing wild applause from the crowd.

“And I didn’t tell her to say that,” the Alaska governor added.

User Comments

What a sleazy scum bag with lipstick

Posted by: mary | October 25, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

UpdateAmerica:
Hawaii governor says nation wouldn’t be safe under Obama (says Obama “touts” he is from Hawaii)
Lingle, though, repeatedly framed the presidential election in terms of the physical safety of Americans and painted Obama as a mysterious figure who is uncomfortable with leadership.
She said voting for Obama would put the safety of the country’s children in the “hands of someone we hardly know.” (She also added that despite Obama’s touting he is from Hawaii, she has never met him and he has “never called me on the phone.”)
Ultimately the country judges the president by how he deals with the unexpected, Lingle said, and Obama “is not a person who will make the tough calls.”

Posted by: UpdateAmerica | October 25, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Barack, Sarah, and the Bible
Jim Bramlett
Sep 1 2008 07:54PM
Dear friends:
Barack Hussein Obama has taken the nation by storm. From obscurity, with zero executive experience, or much of any kind, he has vaulted into the position of Presidential frontrunner. It is stunning. On the surface, it appears attributable only to his eloquent oratory and his race. But an invisible factor may be a strong spiritual force behind him, causing some people to actually swoon in his presence.
I have been very concerned that he has publicly said that he does not believe Jesus is the only way to heaven. This makes both the Bible and Jesus a liar, and it means that Christ has died in vain. A person cannot be a true Christian who believes that there are other ways of forgiveness, salvation, and eternal life with God. Only Jesus has paid the price for that.
Therefore, there is, indeed, another spirit involved. And this spirit has come into our national life like a flood. Last week at Obama’s acceptance speech, that spirit exalted itself in front of a Greek temple-like stage, and to a huge audience like in a Roman arena. Omama was portrayed as god-like. His voice thundered as a god’s voice.
At the end, Democratic sympathizer Pastor Joel Hunter gave the benediction and shockingly invited everyone to close the prayer to their own (false) gods. This was surely an abomination, but it was compatible with Obama’s expressed theology, and Hunter’s leftist leanings.
God was not pleased.
And God says, “When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him” (Isaiah 59:19).
Enter Governor Sarah Palin. With incredible timing, the very next day, Sarah Palin also appeared out of nowhere. Her shocking selection as John McCain’s running mate stunned the world and suddenly took all the wind out of Obama’s sails.
We quickly learned that Sarah is a born-again, Spirit-filled Christian, attends church, and has been a ministry worker.
Sarah is that standard God has raised up to stop the flood. She has the anointing. You can tell by how the dogs are already viciously attacking her. But they will not be successful. She knows the One she serves and will not be intimidated.
Back in the 1980s, I sensed that Israel’s little-known Benjamin Netanyahu was chosen by God for an important end-time role. I still believe that. I now have that same sense about Sarah Palin.
Today I did some checking and discovered that both her first and last names are biblical words, one in Hebrew the other in Greek:
Sarah. Wife of Abraham and mother of Isaac. In Hebrew, Sarah means “noble woman” (Strong’s 8283).
Palin. In Greek, the word means “renewal.” (Strong’s 3825).
A friend said he believes that Sarah Palin is a Deborah. Of Deborah, Smith’s Bible Dictionary says, “A prophetess who judged Israel…. She was not so much a judge as one gifted with prophetic command…. and by virtue of her inspiration ‘a mother in Israel.’”
Only God knows the future and how she may be used by Him, but may this noble woman serve to bring renewal in the land, and inspiration.
Jim

Posted by: TheBible | October 25, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Stop Using your daughter Ms Pitbull with Lipstick. At least, Show some respect for family, we know you don’t have any.

Posted by: radha | October 25, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Yet “unchecked power” wasn’t a problem for McCain and Palin when it was the GOP in charge of Washington.
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | October 25, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Love it!
Dem for McCain/Palin – Obama scares me!

Posted by: steveDC | October 25, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

The media was certainly a check. The media is in the tank for Obama and the Dems.
“Yet “unchecked power” wasn’t a problem for McCain and Palin when it was the GOP in charge of Washington. “

Posted by: xaix | October 25, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

“Unchecked power” was what got us into Iraq. It’s not good for either party to be able to do whatever they want in Washington.

Posted by: Keith | October 25, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Sarah, one minute you’re telling us how much you worry about your children being harassed by the media, and the next minute you’re using them like props on the campaign trail. Your youngest daughter plays to the cameras in way that is very disturbing.

Posted by: overprotective mother? | October 25, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

TheBible: Well you have managed to insult every other religion in the world.I don’t want “your” religion telling me how to live my life. Your kind are no better than the Islamic Terrorists who killed in the name of “God”.This is America after all and it’s your “kind” that brings nothing but derision and hate….how Christ like is that? Your “kind” that are tearing this country apart in the name of Jesus.Read your bible than spew hate against another man…..go to he11.

Posted by: linda n carolina | October 25, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

UpdateAmerica
Democrats forget that the Democrats also voted to send the military to Iraq. Moreover, the Democrats have done nothing when in popwer for the last two years.

Posted by: UpdateAmerica: | October 25, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

We quickly learned that Sarah is a born-again, Spirit-filled Christian, attends church, and has been a ministry worker.
Jim
Posted by: TheBible | Oct 25, 2008 7:35:49 PM
*****************************
MY A S S
Spirit filled born again Christians don’t have the lack of morality and the lack of ethics that Sarah Palin has.

Posted by: Julie | October 25, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Gimme a break – the democrats can barely agree on the proper approach to screw in a light bulb, let alone govern in unison. Look at the bailout bill; there are a lot of democrats there in name only.
If Obama wins, he’s better off dealing with the republicans as they tend to vote more reliably in a bloc; albeit to their own detriment in many cases.

Posted by: MIguy | October 25, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

“Palin Warns Democrats Would Have ‘Unchecked Power’”
is that like what Bush and the republicans have enjoyed?

Posted by: JR | October 25, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Oh God, I can’t wait for this dummy to go back to Alaska and hibernate.
I rather live in “Socialism” then have a pair of idots as my leaders. Look what happened with the current idiot we have running this country.
Anyone with Palin’s IQ should not be allowed to speak in public.

Posted by: Janet | October 25, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Unchecked power in Washington scares me. I don’t trust Pelosi or Harry Reid.

Posted by: Shelley | October 25, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

well Bush had unchecked power and the cons loved that. Payback time.

Posted by: Gus | October 25, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

unchecked power. That means no filibuster by old men trying to keep change from happening.
CHANGE is GOOD. THE GOP IS A FAILURE.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 25, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Are people really that dumb? Americans deserve more than mere survival. Vote Obama.

Posted by: Hilary Smith | October 25, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Palin has this backwards. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld made decisions about the wars and Guatmino bay without following the constitution. The govrnment has been unregulated for the last 8 years with lack of knowledge, or planning. Again Palin doesn’t have her facts correct. Giver her shovel, she is digging herself in way deep.

Posted by: Sophia Beck | October 25, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

The Republicans will be a wedge trying to block every good bill Obama tries to pass. We need a group of people who can work TOGETHER to solve the problems / issues that currently confront this country. Change will only come when people are of one mind and working on one accord to solve our complex issues.

Posted by: y.sister | October 25, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

What? Make decisions for us? What about women making decisions on reproductive choices?
Does not compute, sorry.

Posted by: netrox | October 25, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Funny, I don’t think Palin would be sounding warning sirens about the dangers of unchecked power if the country were on the brink of having a REPUBLICAN President, Congress and Senate.
Oh yeah, and, in case we want to see what would happen if Republicans have unchecked power, just look at 6 of the last 8 yrs.

Posted by: LadyPatriot1776 | October 25, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

She’s telling people that Obama will turn the US into a “Nanny State,” which I assume is the opposite of what her party is pushing, which is a continuation of the “Predator State,” of obscenely rich crooks taking our money for more jets and mansions with the blessing and connivance of our own government.
I look forward to Governor Palin running against President Barrack Obama in 2012.

Posted by: Dolmance | October 25, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Jimbo…take a course in logic, why don’t you? Your entire post was an appeal to authority.

Posted by: tree-ee | October 25, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

You people really are a bunch of morons, all of you. You really believe that all Democrats are good and all Republicans are evil. Let me clue you in. In this day and age if someone chooses to be a politician for their career. They are either a controlling bastard or an idealist, and idealists don’t get far in politics. Every Republican and Democrat has a private agenda, a reason for being there. Trust me the Democrats are just as evil as the Republicans only in different ways. The only way to keep them in check is for them to have different goals. When one political party is in control and they have a common goal watch out we’re all up the creek, and I mean everyone.

Posted by: E | October 25, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I am so tired of the carp!
Palin Said “You can count on John McCain and I to know that we will be there to defend you and protect you and your savings and your investments and your families, not big government,” Palin added.
Umm, how is that different from what she was denouncing in her speech, you know government as a family member. If McCain wins he will be in government!

Posted by: Amada | October 25, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

$150,000, and they didn’t even buy her a jacket?

Posted by: helloworld | October 25, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

You Palin haters are pathetic. Do you think you have IQ higher than hers? I do not think so, because you just blindly follow whatever your messiah – Obama says. You are brainless bunch of idiots.

Posted by: George | October 25, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

This is going to be a heated election. Both canidates have campaigned hard. More of the voters are involved than before. Americans need to pull together, regardless of who gets in, for the good of America.
I am for Obama, but if McCain gets in I want our country to turn around and get back on the road to prosperity again. It’s going to take a lot of work to get back on track for all of us.

Posted by: Ed Baldwin | October 25, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Jr posted:
I rather live in “Socialism”…
I lived in socialism for 36 years. I would rather live with the NcCain-Palin ticket for the rest of my life.
You sould move to Venezuela, Bolivia, N.Korea, or Cuba, and have fun.
Also you use the “idiot” world to often. Get a mirror.

Posted by: STS | October 25, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Gee Sarah, you mean like the Republicans had for 6 years under Bush? Oh, you probably never read about that..

Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

…an era of “government as part of your family, taking care of us, making decisions for us…”
Isn’t that what Palin and her ilk would do if she were elected? Isn’t telling a woman under which circumstances she can or cannot terminate a pregnancy just that? Come on. This woman is a walking contradiction!

Posted by: Todd | October 25, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

How about unchecked stupidity if Palin ever becomes President? Would you like to have another go Governor at how wasteful fruit fly research is when we should be spending more money for children with special needs such as autism? And this is one of her areas of “expertise”?

Posted by: mila | October 25, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

It seems funny that she seems to believe she would be powerless to represent her state and country effectivley if not elected to the white house. To say that checks and balances would cease to exist is simply a scare tactic… If not, this would have been a MAJOR topic at the begining of the campaigns.

Posted by: Lee | October 25, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Oh yes she did. The sneaky little dig about “Uncle Barney Frank” did not go unnoticed. What a shameless rabble rouser she is, stirring hatred and dividing state against state, class against class while hiding behind $22,000 worth of makeup. So middle class there, Sarah. Oh yeah, she’s one of us alright.

Posted by: Jack Pryor | October 25, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Sarah Palin is no genius, but she sure has THIS one right! She and McCain might as well pack up and go home; we are about to live in the United Socialist States of America. It’s Russia in 1916 all over again, but without anyone being murdered.

Posted by: Rhys | October 25, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Well said, E. That is why our national founders want all the checks and balances in place to keep the selfish politicians to act responsibly. Look what Republicans did when they have control of everything. Do you guys really want repeat of that?

Posted by: George | October 25, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Unchecked power? What on earth is Palin talking about. The dems will only get the same power Bush has had. Bush abused it, why can’t they? It’s somehow worse to have the dems do it than the republicans?

Posted by: Matt | October 25, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Because Iowa isn’t in McCain’s reach, clearly the McCain race for the White House is over because he and Palin have shifted to trying to shore up faltering Republican Congressional races.

Posted by: Maezeppa | October 25, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

To Janet:
I think you will greatley regret your words. I LIVED in socialism. I live now here for 20 years. You have no idea what are you talking about. Starting with medical treatment, when you can’t believe the only doctor you assigned to see, and ending with long lines to buy meat. We had a change in 1917. I don’t think you want that change.

Posted by: janna | October 25, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

How can Obama give a speech in Columbia, South Carolina ending it with FU you Nate and no one says anything about it? Check it out.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/obama_modifies_yes_we_can_message

Posted by: papadao | October 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

What a perfect example this woman is of savy snake-oil sales; in the name of cult-like church-state illegal crusade Ms Palin was a member of an anti-lower 48 seperatist movement!You are a hypocritical anti-american Ms.Palin.

Posted by: mother nature | October 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

– I don’t think you want that change. –
Good thing it won’t then, huh Janna?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

USSA, coming soon.

Posted by: Christie | October 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Be advised – if you support Palin, fine, but you are instantly disqualified from questioning the IQ of others…

Posted by: MIguy | October 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Matt, I completely agree that Bush has abused his power. But what you’re saying is that two wrongs DO make a right.
Bush has done several things which I dislike intensely, but I wouldn’t want to destroy America to “get even”!

Posted by: Rhys | October 25, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

For the comment of “overprotective mother?” who obviously has forgotten this is the United States of America and that this countries religon was based on Christianity and the Bible.The religon you call “your” religon in your post, happens to be what this country was based on. Your religon, whatever that may be, is the religon that is misplaced for this country. Believe and practice whatever religon you want, but do it without trying to change OUR Christian religon.

Posted by: Jerry | October 25, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

“Unchecked power” was what got us into Iraq. It’s not good for either party to be able to do whatever they want in Washington.
Posted by: Keith |
———————————
Yeah, Collin Powell was part of that “unchecked power” team. He just endorsed “Big 0″ to be next our Commander in Chief!
Yeap, Barack Obama, the HYPOCRITE, who ran his campaign against Hillary Clinton based on the fact that he did not vote for the war – that Obama – is now grateful for Powell’s endorsement!
Oh! I know…Powell’s famous speech at the UN (Feb. 2003) telling the world that Iraq had in fact weapons of mass destruction was “just words”…”just another pretty speech”, like his “pretty Obama endorsement speech” to Tom Brokaw.
Hypocricy at its glory.

Posted by: Natasha | October 25, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

What if the anti-christ is a woman.
The bible did not say what the gender of the anti-christ was, better be careful.
She has her own personal witch doctor. She can put you in one of her spells with one of her hoodwinks. Palin and McCain are mean and vicious and are going to do and say anything to win this election. They probably hired the joe the plumber guy and the woman that was attacked at the atm.

Posted by: mary | October 25, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

No, I don’t want that change. And I am sure you don’t want it eather.

Posted by: Janna | October 25, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

First Barack was inexperienced, then a secret Muslim, then a paller with terrorists, then someone we “don’t know” and now… what is it? Oh, yes, he’s a scary socialist. Do you happen to notice how Palin and her sidekick never seem to talk about their own plans… except to deregulate some more? (seriously! They’re still saying that!) They’re stuck. They’ve got nuthin. So they attack, and once in awhile they revert to McCain’s old money-grubbing approach of letting business handle things itself. Well guess what? Government isn’t the enemy anymore, is it–it’s all that’s going to save us from the capitalist greedmongers.
Obama a socialist? I doubt it. He just made several million dollars selling two very well written books–books that reveal exactly who he is for all to see if you have enough brains to read it instead of listening to Rush bloviate about him. Obama doesn’t mind paying a little more after a decade of the rich getting so fat they’re ready to burst–but instead they wanted more and almost burst US. That’s not socialist. That’s patriotism.
Get a clue, folks. McCain is not on your side, never has been, and Palin is a policy clone who was programmed to say all this stuff and now just spits it out like a twangy droid. She’s a follower and the worst kind of sycophant (look it up). Vote for her and her sidekick and you’re asking for four more Bush years, period. Don’t be dumb about your future. Once you sift through all the camouflage, more Bush is all they’ve got, and they’re not even hiding it very well.

Posted by: dmw | October 25, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

– No, I don’t want that change. And I am sure you don’t want it eather. –
Nope.. I’m voting for Obama for a better America!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

updateAmerica, you do realize that the Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano is a Democrat and Obama supporter? And Lingle the Governor of Hawaii is a Republican?

Posted by: mila | October 25, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

The republicans had control of every thing until eighteen months ago, they never showed any concern for the common man.remember the hurricane that hit New Orleans. They LIED TO US started a war with people who did not bother us while bearly glancing at the people who did,
why have they not hunted down the real people who attacked us? We have been sold to China to line their friends pockets, Everyone in the world hates us. dont let me start about the economy which they swore was strong (LIES AGAIN) until two months ago. They say Obama has no experience and we should let them and their experience fix the problem they created. They had eight long years. people who listen to the republicans, are sheep who can’t think for themselves. IT is so so sad to see

Posted by: stargazer57 | October 25, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

steve dem,
love it too.
Oh shoot I already voted for Barack.
Darn do i feel like a fool, sarah finally had me convinced to vote for mcsame. oh well, if she’s not in jail maybe i can vote for poor sarah in 2012

Posted by: Sickened | October 25, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

No wonder Sarah Palin receives such sensational fanfare from her supporters. The only other place they’ve seen such class displayed in public is on Jerry Springer!

Posted by: Hilary Smith | October 25, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

The Pittsburgh-Tribune Review reports on the Obama/ACORN connection:
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to an offshoot of the liberal Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now for services the Democrat’s campaign says it mistakenly misrepresented in federal reports.
An Obama spokesman said Federal Election Commission reports would be amended to show Citizens Services Inc. — a subsidiary of ACORN — worked in “get-out-the-vote” projects, instead of activities such as polling, advance work and staging major events as stated in FEC finance reports filed during the primary.
FEC spokeswoman Mary Brandenberger said it is not unusual for campaigns to amend reports, even regarding large sums of money.
But, said Blair Latoff, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee: “Barack Obama’s failure to accurately report his campaign’s financial records is an incredibly suspicious situation that appears to be an attempt to hide his campaign’s interaction with a left-wing organization previously convicted of voter fraud. For a candidate who claims to be practicing ‘new’ politics, his FEC reports look an awful lot like the ‘old-style’ Chicago politics of yesterday.”
In response to the RNC’s position, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said in an e-mail: “The RNC can concoct all of the outlandish conspiracy theories they want, but when we saw that our FEC report didn’t accurately reflect the field work CSI was hired to perform we corrected it. It’s pretty bold for the RNC to attack us for a clerical error after John McCain’s campaign was just forced to return $50,000 raised by a foreign national through a number of contributors who weren’t even supporting McCain.”
Melanie Sloan, executive director of the liberal-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said the campaign’s error on FEC documents doesn’t seem extraordinary, especially considering the huge amounts of money being spent.
“It’s rare that people don’t file any amended reports. If he has a pattern of lots and lots of amended reports, that would be more noteworthy than an occasional one,” Sloan said.

Posted by: msa123 | October 25, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Jr posted:
I rather live in “Socialism”…
———————————–
I lived in socialism for 36 years. I would rather live with the McCain-Palin ticket for the rest of my life.
You sould move to Venezuela, Bolivia, N.Korea, or Cuba, and have fun.
Also you use the “idiot” world to often. Get a mirror.
Posted by: STS
————————————
Marxist Obama can take his “community organizing experience” and along with his comrades – “Ayers & Co.” go to Russia… to organize some Siberian Gulags and “spread the wealth around”!
Obama: Putin and Medvedev love you, man!

Posted by: Natasha | October 25, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

The Democrats have promoted unity and togetherness throughout the campaign while the Repuclican have promoted fear and division. Look at the rallies and the tone from each one. We should be fearing 4 more years of devisiveness and fear if a Republican is at the head. The Bush regime created so many messes because the Republicans ruled and never involved anyone else in the process.

Posted by: George | October 25, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Jerry, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, First Amendment, check it out. The government of the United States has no official religion

Posted by: mila | October 25, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

You know, I remain very angry that Bin Laden is still out there, mocking us.
How can ‘patriots’ think that New York and D.C. are not the real America when they were the sites of the attacks?
How can others co-opt the anger of the attack and not respect the targets?
Did you see Colin Powell’s endorsement of Obama?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27265369/
He gave very sound reasons for the endorsement and for rejecting McCain.

Posted by: GOP | October 25, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

You know, I remain very angry that Bin Laden is still out there, mocking us.
How can ‘patriots’ think that New York and D.C. are not the real America when they were the sites of the attacks?
How can others co-opt the anger of the attack and not respect the targets?
Did you see Colin Powell’s endorsement of Obama?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27265369/
He gave very sound reasons for the endorsement and for rejecting McCain.

Posted by: GOP | October 25, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

To papadao, who apparently liked the Obama speech parody on theonion web site, here is one you will find amusing as well:
Southern Sheriff Pulls Over Obama Campaign Bus For Broken Taillight
http://www.theonion.com/content/news/southern_sheriff_pulls_over_obama

Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Regarding:Barack, Sarah, and the Bible
Jim Bramlett
Sep 1 2008 07:54PM
Very interesting observation! And more reason to vote for McCain.

Posted by: Julie | October 25, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

“Vote Republican or Die!” This message is not working it the same message you guys used at your convention and the result is you’re down 10 point in the polls. I have a question.. Why didn’t you say “Thanks but no thanks when someone bought you and your family $150,000.00 worth of clothes? I guess it’s not in your nature to ask the right questions. Sarah Palin is John McCains Poodle and a Danger to national security. Please vote her and her disfunctional family off the Island.
We need Fruit Flies more than you will ever know Sarah…….

Posted by: Torrance | October 25, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Here’s one for Natasha the Moose Hunter:
Sarah Palins Advice For Women Beginning In Politics:
“If you work hard and keep your nose clean, you too can have a rich, powerful man come and whisk you off to Washington.”
http://www.theonion.com/content/whitehousewar/sarahpalin

Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

America’s standing in the world is at an all time low. The country is in financial ruin, lost jobs, our 401k is vanishing righ before our eyes. Millions in home foreclosure. The country is in a recession. Republicans are good at sreadding hate and fear to the American public. They are the most vile, self righteous hypocrits around. They talk about Obama and Bill Ayers. What about G. Gordon Liddy and his affiliation with Mc Cain. Pailin’s husband belonged to a secessionist group. His affiliation with Charles Keating. Yet we hear no mention of this. Now we see Republicans talking about thise who are real Americans and those who are not, more divisive negative attacks. When we loose our soldiers in combat do we ask if they were real americans or not, does it matter if they were Republican or Democrat. All that matters is that they died in service for their country. We have Catholics, Proestants, Muslim, Jews that all serve and have died for America.
We have soldiers that are coming back from a war that was first and foremost based on lies. Yet we see that these soldiers can’t even get a job when they return, even proper medical care is lacking. We are spending 10 billion a month, when that money could have bben used to creat jobs, build a better infastructure, go to health care, schools, college assistance for our children.
Why is it that the white population of America feels that only a white person is the only one qualified to be President of America. Blacks have been voting for whites for years, yet many whites cannot see themselves voting for a black man. They will say in public I’m anot racist, I plan to vote for Obama, yet we all know know that when they go into that voing booth and oull those curtains behind them that John Mc Cain is who they will vote for.
If Americans truly believe that under this President, who will be remembered as the worst this country has ever seen that they are doing well and are financially secure and this country is heading in the right direction then by all means vote fo Mc Cain. However if you truly believe that thiere is hope for a better future then the choice is Barak Obama.

Posted by: DuncanMcCloud | October 25, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Dem for McCain/Palin – Obama scares me!
He is poised to SCARE the hell out of all the Americans!!

Posted by: JKan | October 25, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

I CAN’T GET THESE TIRE MARKS OFF’N ME, FROM WHEN THAT DAMN BUCKY THREW ME UNDER THE BUS!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 25, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

The Bush regime created so many messes because the Republicans ruled and never involved anyone else in the process.
Posted by: George
————————————-
The Last Two Years
By Randall Hoven
October 19, 2008
The Obama/Biden ticket’s entire campaign theme is based on “the last eight years.” Maybe we should really look at “the last two years,” or the time period when both the House and the Senate were run by Democrats.
In December 2006, after six years of Bush and the last month before the Democrats took over both houses of the national legislature, a snapshot of our economy looked like this.
Unemployment stood at 4.4%.
Real GDP growth over the previous four years (under a Republican President, House and Senate) averaged 3% per year.
A gallon of regular gasoline cost $2.30.
The S&P 500 stock index stood at 1418, or 84% above its post-911 low and more than 7% higher than when Bush took office.
Every year of Bush’s Presidency, real (inflation-adjusted) disposable income per person went up. By the end of 2006, the average person was making 9% more in real terms than before Bush became President .
If you recall, that 2006 election was considered a referendum on Iraq. The people wanted change, so they threw out the Republicans and replaced them with Democrats. Welcome Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Here is how they handled Iraq once in office: Harry Reid told us that the Iraq war was “lost” and the surge was not “accomplishing anything.” Senator Obama introduced legislation that would have prevented the surge and would have taken all US troops out of Iraq by March 2008 (that would be seven months ago, as you read this) .
Were they right?
Barack Obama now admits that “the surge succeeded.” So much for that change. And as the surge succeeded, Congress’s approval ratings plummeted. The latest CBS/New York Times poll has it at 12%, well less than half of the already low level it stood at when the Republican Congress was being tossed out in 2006.
The Democratic Congress did a great job, if what you’re looking for in a Congress is continual investigation of Republicans. Did the White House out CIA agent Valerie Plame? No, it was the anti-White House Richard Armitage at State, but Congress investigated anyway. Did Alberto Gonzalez, with White House urging, fire nine prosecutors for political reasons? Probably not, and it wouldn’t be a crime anyway, but Congress investigated, and is still investigating. Did the CIA, under orders from the White House, “torture” prisoners? No evidence of that yet, but Congress is on the case.
What Congress would not investigate was anything about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In fact, they fought against such investigations and cast aspersions against anyone who would even doubt the soundness of those institutions. Here is what Barney Frank said:
These two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.
You can also see on this video (follow link) how Democrats treated the regulators trying to reign in Fannie and Freddie.
(video)
http://vodpod.com/watch/1038839-dems-refuse-to-reform-freddie-fannie-in-2004-video
But now we know what happened. Fannie and Freddie were run corruptly and ineptly and went bankrupt. Their $1.5 trillion portfolios had to be rescued by the government this year. Franklin Raines, the Clinton-appointed CEO of Fannie Mae who was vigorously defended by Congressional Democrats, was sued by government regulators for cooking the books to the tune of $10 billion to increase his own bonuses to the tune of tens of millions. He settled his suit for an estimated $25 million.
On the other hand, here is what the New York Times had to say in 2003 .
The Bush administration is rightly pushing for the Treasury Department to regulate the two giants, along with the network of federal home loan banks. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae provide financing to lenders by creating a secondary market for mortgages. All told, these two institutions’ debt portfolio exceeds more than $1.5 trillion. Their current regulator is ill equipped to keep tabs on Freddie’s and Fannie’s sophisticated hedging strategies and the other financial moves they use to manage their huge investments.
And here is what John McCain said on the Senate floor:
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
So on the big things, the surge in Iraq and the failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that led to our recent financial mess, the Democrats were wrong. Dead wrong. One hundred eighty degrees out wrong.
On the other hand, who supported the surge? George W. Bush and John McCain.
Who tried to strengthen the oversight and regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? George W. Bush and John McCain.
In the case of the surge, Bush and McCain got their way. The result? Apparent victory in Iraq, a country that is now a democracy, at peace with its neighbors, no longer a WMD threat, no longer a terrorist sanctuary, and no longer filling hundreds of mass graves with hundreds of thousands of its own citizens.
In the case of Fannie and Freddie, Bush and McCain did not get their way – Barney Frank did. The result? The failure of Fannie and Freddie, law suits against their executives and the spark that sent banks failing and stocks falling across the globe to the point of threatening a Great Depression.
Let’s vote for change. Let’s undo what we did in 2006
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/the_last_two_years.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 25, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I guess Palin’s forgetting that voters ultimately have the power (as when Repubs are/have been losing government positions), though “they” can sure screw things up in the amount of time it takes voters to do something about it.

Posted by: chris | October 25, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

By Stanley Kurtz
It looks like Jeremiah Wright was just the tip of the iceberg. Not only did Barack Obama savor Wright’s sermons, Obama gave legitimacy — and a whole lot of money — to education programs built around the same extremist anti-American ideology preached by Reverend Wright. And guess what? Bill Ayers is still palling around with the same bitterly anti-American Afrocentric ideologues that he and Obama were promoting a decade ago. All this is revealed by a bit of digging, combined with a careful study of documents from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, the education foundation Obama and Ayers jointly led in the late 1990s.
John McCain, take note. Obama’s tie to Wright is no longer a purely personal question (if it ever was one) about one man’s choice of his pastor. The fact that Obama funded extremist Afrocentrists who shared Wright’s anti-Americanism means that this is now a matter of public policy, and therefore an entirely legitimate issue in this campaign.
African Village
In the winter of 1996, the Coalition for Improved Education in [Chicago’s] South Shore (CIESS) announced that it had received a $200,000 grant from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. That made CIESS an “external partner,” i.e. a community organization linked to a network of schools within the Chicago public system. This network, named the “South Shore African Village Collaborative” was thoroughly “Afrocentric” in orientation. CIESS’s job was to use a combination of teacher-training, curriculum advice, and community involvement to improve academic performance in the schools it worked with. CIESS would continue to receive large Annenberg grants throughout the 1990s.
The South Shore African Village Collaborative (SSAVC) was very much a part of the Afrocentric “rites of passage movement,” a fringe education crusade of the 1990s. SSAVC schools featured “African-Centered” curricula built around “rites of passage” ceremonies inspired by the puberty rites found in many African societies. In and of themselves, these ceremonies were harmless. Yet the philosophy that accompanied them was not. On the contrary, it was a carbon-copy of Jeremiah Wright’s worldview.
Rites of Passage
To learn what the rites of passage movement was all about, we can turn to a sympathetic 1992 study published in the Journal of Negro Education by Nsenga Warfield-Coppock. In that article, Warfield-Coppock bemoans the fact that public education in the United States is shaped by “capitalism, competitiveness, racism, sexism and oppression.” According to Warfield-Coppock, these American values “have confused African American people and oriented them toward American definitions of achievement and success and away from traditional African values.” American socialization has “proven to be dysfuntional and genocidal to the African American community,” Warfield-Coppock tells us. The answer is the adolescent rites of passage movement, designed “to provide African American youth with the cultural information and values they would need to counter the potentially detrimental effects of a Eurocentrically oriented society.”
The adolescent rites of passage movement that flowered in the 1990s grew out of the “cultural nationalist” or “Pan-African” thinking popular in radical black circles of the 1960s and 1970s. The attempt to create a virtually separate and intensely anti-American black social world began to take hold in the mid-1980s in small private schools, which carefully guarded the contents of their controversial curricula. Gradually, through external partners like CIESS, the movement spread to a few public schools. Supporters view these programs as “a social and cultural ‘inoculation’ process that facilitates healthy, African-centered development among African American youth and protects them against the ravages of a racist, sexist, capitalist, and oppressive society.”
We know that SSAVC was part of this movement, not only because their Annenberg proposals were filled with Afrocentric themes and references to “rites of passage,” but also because SSAVC’s faculty set up its African-centered curriculum in consultation with some of the most prominent leaders of the “rites of passage movement.” For example, a CIESS teacher conference sponsored a presentation on African-centered curricula by Jacob Carruthers, a particularly controversial Afrocentrist.
Jacob Carruthers
Like other leaders of the rites of passage movement, Carruthers teaches that the true birthplace of world civilization was ancient “Kemet” (Egypt), from which Kemetic philosophy supposedly spread to Africa as a whole. Carruthers and his colleagues believe that the values of Kemetic civilization are far superior to the isolating and oppressive, ancient Greek-based values of European and American civilization. Although academic Egyptologists and anthropologists strongly reject these historical claims, Carruthers dismisses critics as part of a white supremacist conspiracy to hide the truth of African superiority.
Carruthers’s key writings are collected in his book, Intellectual Warfare. Reading it is a wild, anti-American ride. In his book, we learn that Carruthers and his like-minded colleagues have formed an organization called the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilizations (ASCAC), which takes as its mission the need to “dismantle the European intellectual campaign to commit historicide against African peoples.” Carruthers includes “African-Americans” within a group he would define as simply “African.” When forced to describe a black person as “American,” Carruthers uses quotation marks, thus indicating that no black person can be American in any authentic sense. According to Carruthers, “The submission to Western civilization and its most outstanding offspring, American civilization, is, in reality, surrender to white supremacy.”
Carruthers’s goal is to use African-centered education to recreate a separatist universe within America, a kind of state-within-a-state. The rites of passage movement is central to the plan. Carruthers sees enemies on every part of the political spectrum, from conservatives, to liberals, to academic leftists, all of whom reject advocates of Kemetic civilization, like himself, as dangerous and academically irresponsible extremists. Carruthers sees all these groups as deluded captives of white supremacist Eurocentric culture. Therefore the only safe place for Africans living in the United States (i.e. American blacks) is outside the mental boundaries of our ineradicably racist Eurocentric civilization. As Carruthers puts it: “…some of us have chosen to reject the culture of our oppressors and recover our disrupted ancestral culture.” The rites of passage movement is a way to teach young Africans in the United States how to reject America and recover their authentic African heritage.
America as Rape
Carruthers admits that Africans living in America have already been shaped by Western culture, yet compares this Americanization process to rape: “We may not be able to get our virginity back after the rape, but we do not have to marry the rapist….” In other words, American blacks (i.e. Africans) may have been forcibly exposed to American culture, but that doesn’t mean they need to accept it. The better option, says Carruthers, is to separate out and relearn the wisdom of Africa’s original Kemetic culture, embodied in the teachings of the ancient wise man, Ptahhotep (an historical figure traditionally identified as the author of a Fifth Dynasty wisdom book). Anything less than re-Africanization threatens the mental, and even physical, genocide of Africans living in an ineradicably white supremacist United States.
Carruthers is a defender of Leonard Jeffries, professor in the department of black studies at City College in Harlem, infamous for his black supremacist and anti-Semitic views. Jeffries sees whites as oppressive and violent “ice people,” in contrast to peaceful and mutually supportive black “sun people.” The divergence says Jeffries, is attributable to differing levels of melanin in the skin. Jeffries also blames Jews for financing the slave trade. Carruthers defends Jeffries and excoriates the prestigious black academics Carruthers views as traitorous for denouncing their African brother, Jeffries. Carruthers’s vision of the superior and peaceful Kemetic philosophy of Ptahhotep triumphing over Greco-Euro-American-white culture obviously parallels Jeffries’ opposition between ice people and sun people.
More of Carruthers’s education philosophy can be found in his newsletter, The Kemetic Voice. In 1997, for example, at the same time Carruthers was advising SSAVC on how to set up an African-centered curriculum, he praised the decision of New Orleans’ School Board to remove the name of George Washington from an elementary school. Apparently, some officials in New Orleans had decided that nobody who held slaves should have a school named after him. Carruthers touted the name-change as proof that his African-centered perspective was finally having an effect on public policy. At the demise of George Washington School, Carruthers crowed: “These events remind us of how vast the gulf is that separates the Defenders of Western Civilization from the Champions of African Civilization.”
According to Chicago Annenberg Challenge records, Carruthers’s training session on African-centered curricula for SSAVC teachers was a huge hit: “As a consciousness raising session, it received rave reviews, and has prepared the way for the curriculum readiness survey….” These teacher-training workshops were directly funded by the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Another sure sign of the ideological cast of SSAVC’s curriculum can be found in Annenberg documents noting that SSAVC students are taught the wisdom of Ptahhotep. Carruthers’s concerns about “menticide” and “genocide” at the hand of America’s white supremacist system seem to be echoed in an SSAVC document that says: “Our children need to understand the historical context of our struggles for liberation from those forces that seek to destroy us.”
When Jeremiah Wright turned toward African-centered thinking in the late 1980s and early 1990s (the period when, attracted by Wright’s African themes, Barack Obama first became a church member), many prominent thinkers from Carruthers’s Association for the Study of Classical African Civilizations were invited to speak at Trinity United Church of Christ, Carruthers himself included. We hear echoes of Carruthers’s work in Wright’s distinction between “right brained” Africans and “left brained” Europeans, in Wright’s fears of U.S. government-sponsored genocide against American blacks, and in Wright’s embittered attacks on America’s indelibly white-supremacist history. In Wright’s Trumpet Newsmagazine, as in Carruthers’s own writings, blacks are often referred to as “Africans living in the diaspora” rather than as Americans.
Asa Hilliard
Chicago Annenberg Challenge records also indicate that SSAVC educators invited Asa Hilliard, a pioneer of African-centered curricula and a close colleague of Carruthers, to offer a keynote address at yet another Annenberg-funded teacher training session. Hilliard’s ties to Wright run still deeper than Carruthers’s. A close Wright mentor and friend, Hilliard died in 2007 while on a trip to Kemet (Egypt) with Wright and members of Wright’s congregation. Hillard was scheduled to deliver several lectures to the congregants, and to speak at a meeting of the Association for the Study of Classical African Civilization, which he co-founded with Carruthers and other “African-centered” scholars. On that last trip, Hilliard accepted an appointment to the board of Wright’s new elementary school, Kwame Nkrumah Academy. Speaking of the need for such a school, Wright had earlier said, “We need to educate our children to the reality of white supremacy.” (For more on Wright’s Afrocentric school, see “Jeremiah Wright’s ‘Trumpet.’”)
Wright delivered the eulogy at Hilliard’s memorial service, with prominent members of ASCAC in the audience. To commemorate Hilliard, a special, two-cover double issue of Wright’s Trumpet Newsmagazine was published, with a picture of Hilliard on one side, and a picture of Louis Farrakhan on the other (in celebration of a 2007 award Farrakhan received from Wright). In short, the ties between Wright and Hilliard could hardly have been closer. Clearly, then, Wright’s own educational philosophy was mirrored at the Annenberg-funded SSAVC, which sought out Hilliard’s and Carruthers’s counsel to construct its curriculum.
Perhaps inadvertently, Wright’s eulogy for Hilliard actually established the fringe nature of his favorite African-centered scholars. In his tribute, Wright stressed how intensely “white Egyptologists recoiled at the very notion of everything Asa taught.” As Wright himself made plain, it seems virtually impossible to find respectable scholars of any political stripe who approve of the extremist anti-American version of Afrocentrism promoted by Hilliard and Carruthers.
Ayers’s Pals
An important exception to the rule is Bill Ayers himself, who not only worked with Obama to fund groups like this at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, but who is still “palling around” with the same folks. Discretely waiting until after the election, Bill Ayers and his wife, and fellow former terrorist, Bernardine Dohrn plan to release a book in 2009 entitled Race Course Against White Supremacy. The book will be published by Third World Press, a press set up by Carruthers and other members of the ASCAC. Representatives of that press were prominently present for Wright’s eulogy at Asa Hilliard’s memorial service. Less than a decade ago, therefore, when it came to education issues, Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, and Jeremiah Wright were pretty much on the same page.
Obama’s Knowledge
Given the precedent of his earlier responses on Ayers and Wright, Obama might be inclined to deny personal knowledge of the educational philosophy he was so generously funding. Such a denial would not be convincing. For one thing, we have evidence that in 1995, the same year Obama assumed control of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, he publicly rejected “the unrealistic politics of integrationist assimilation,” a stance that clearly resonates with both Wright and Carruthers. (See “No Liberation.”)
And as noted, Wright had invited Carruthers, Hilliard, and like-minded thinkers to address his Trinity congregants. Wright likes to tick off his connections to these prominent Afrocentrists in sermons, and Obama would surely have heard of them. Reading over SSAVC’s Annenberg proposals, Obama could hardly be ignorant of what they were about. And if by some chance Obama overlooked Hilliard’s or Carruthers’s names, SSAVC’s proposals are filled with references to “rites of passage” and “Ptahhotep,” dead giveaways for the anti-American and separatist ideological concoction favored by SSAVC.
We know that Obama did read the proposals. Annenberg documents show him commenting on proposal quality. And especially after 1995, when concerns over self-dealing and conflicts of interest forced the Ayers-headed “Collaborative” to distance itself from monetary issues, all funding decisions fell to Obama and the board. Significantly, there was dissent within the board. One business leader and experienced grant-smith characterized the quality of most Annenberg proposals as “awful.” (See “The Chicago Annenberg Challenge: The First Three Years,” p. 19.) Yet Obama and his very small and divided board kept the money flowing to ideologically extremist groups like the South Shore African Village Collaborative, instead of organizations focused on traditional educational achievement.
As if the content of SSAVC documents wasn’t warning enough, their proposals consistently misspelled “rites of passage” as “rights of passage,” hardly an encouraging sign from a group meant to improve children’s reading skills. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge’s own evaluators acknowledged that Annenberg-aided schools showed no improvement in achievement scores. Evaluators attributed that failure, in part, to the fact that many of Annenberg’s “external partners” had little educational expertise. A group that puts its efforts into Kwanzaa celebrations and half-baked history certainly fits that bill, and goes a long way toward explaining how Ayers and Obama managed to waste upwards of $150 million without improving student achievement.
However he may seek to deny it, all evidence points to the fact that, from his position as board chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Barack Obama knowingly and persistently funded an educational project that shared the extremist and anti-American philosophy of Jeremiah Wright. The Wright affair was no fluke. It’s time for McCain to say so.

Posted by: Rob | October 25, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

God bless Palin!
Gov Palin is what America needs to clean up the special interest in DC and the corrupt machines Chicago!
No wonder they are scared and want to destroy her. She like Reagan will prevail!
PALIN PALIN PALIN!!

Posted by: Sarah is awesome | October 25, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

“It is the choice between a politician who puts his faith in government, and a leader, John McCain, who puts his faith in you,” Palin said.
Mrs. Palin, in the United States, the people are the government. And we the people are about to speak.

Posted by: Rthomas | October 25, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

It’s been non-stop fear by the Obots since Palin came on to the scene.
Hate, hate, hate. Just like with Hillary, but worse.
You know those Obots are afraid of Palin, cuz she’s the real thing!
YOU BETCHA!

Posted by: HOUSE GORILLAS | October 25, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Democrats and unchecked power is not what Bush has had, the congress that is controlled by DEMOCRATS has been in control for the past 2 years. Hence all the problems the economy is in right now, you can thank Pelosi and Reid and Barney Frank, and go back to Clinton for the subprime mortgages given to those who never qualified to pay them back!
Although the Bush administration has been on a spending spree, with Obama planning to spend spend spend, change is not what Obama is offering.

Posted by: HH | October 25, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

“If you don’t think John McCain is just as dangerous in the White House as George W. Bush, think again.”
“McCain will not reverse the foreign policy mistakes of George Bush. He is content to leave us in Iraq, saying it’d be ‘fine by me’ if we were in Iraq for another 100 years. He is rash on using military force with Iran. He overplays the military card and doesn’t seem to appreciate that the real strength of the nation lies in our economy and in our values.”
General Wesley Clark
Retired Four Star General
Former Supreme Commander of NATO

Posted by: WClark | October 25, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Barack Obama is not ready to be president

Posted by: Joe Biden | October 25, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

THAT DAMN OBAMMY, HE NEVER COMES TO SEE ME.
NOW HE COMES HERE, HE JUST DOES IT FOR HIMSELF.
THAT DAMN A$$HOLE!

Posted by: GRANNY TOOT | October 25, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

LEHRER: .. when should the United States deploy its armed forces abroad, and what criteria should be used? Are you comfortable with the decision-making that would – that a Bush-Cheney- Powell triumvirate would make?
McCAIN: Yes. I’m extremely comfortable and basically it’s when American interests and values are threatened. And sometimes when our values are threatened, over time our interests can be threatened. I can’t make an argument to you that Kosovo posed an immediate threat to our national interest. But I can argue that it offended our values to a degree that if allowed to go unchecked, then unrestrained, once Milosevic started to do his ethnic cleansing, then sooner or later our interest would be threaten because that same kind of scenario would transpire in other places in Europe.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/election/july-dec00/mccain_8-1.html
I’m John McCain, and I think I approve this message.

Posted by: JohnM | October 25, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

What’s truly amazing is no one called Child Protection after overhearing little Piper asking Sarah, “Will I be able to eat with the family tonight, Mommy!I did good, didn’t I? Shame on you, Sarah/your Republican child-beating supporters!

Posted by: ROC2341 | October 25, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Gov.Palin is awesome indeed. I just came back home from her rally here in Ft. Wayne.20 thousand people packed the place to meet her and listening to her.
Sarah you are a real inspiration to many women and men, to me, my daughters and all the people that got to see a true leader tonight.
We’ll vote for you.

Posted by: Mary K in FT Wayne, IN | October 25, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Palin is the real deal.
that’s why the Obammy lap dogs are out in full force in attack mode!
they’re scared shitle$$!

Posted by: Palin is the real deal | October 25, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Sarah is a big drag on the McCain ticket. I’m not too scared.

Posted by: fivepin | October 25, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Even if the Democrats and Barack Obama wanted to do what Palin charges (which they don’t) they’d not be able to find the time for it.
They are going to be mightily busy – and struggling even then – to correct just the worst of what Bush has done to us. Look at the stature of the US in the world, look at the US and world economies, look at the still horribly unbalanced federal budget (deficits DO matter.) Obama and Congress do have their jobs cut out for them. Both parties in Congress. Palin should have been warning us in 2000. That’s when the era of destructive one-party rule happened.
(I see a few comments up that it is asserted that Bush supported the surge. Bush was a latecomer. Many in Congress stated over and over that Rumsfeld was failing because he would not commit enough troops to the task. Bush backed Rumsfeld. Only after Rumsfeld was ousted was a “surge” possible and only then did Bush flip-flop and back additional boots on the ground. The pre-surge situation was the result of a series of massive screw-ups, with “screw-up” denoting the following of a badly flawed policy. Bush was central to the badly flawed policies. Duh. He is Commander-in-Chief.)

Posted by: hewhoasks | October 25, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Isn’t it amazing, the Republicians were in control of congress for 6 of the last 8 yrs, yet Democrats are being blamed for this financial meltdown.

Posted by: DuncanMcCloud | October 25, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

The first VP Candidate to possibly be charged with a felony.

Posted by: whynot | October 25, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

“Isn’t it amazing, the Republicians were in control of congress for 6 of the last 8 yrs, yet Democrats are being blamed for this financial meltdown.”
WELL DURING THE PRIMARIES, YOU WERE BLAMING THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION. MAKE UP YOUR MIND YOU HYPOCRITICAL OBOTS

Posted by: STUPID HEAD IN THE CLOUDS | October 25, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

we’re going to have a government that the president, house congress and senate are the same party. They will control every thing. So America will nolonger differ from Cina, Vietnam , Indonesia…. Please voters reconsider it.

Posted by: DDS | October 25, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Well Dodd and Barney “drag” Frank have always supported Fannie and Freddie. Dodd got two sweet deals from Countrywide and one of the Freddie executives was romanticaly involved with Frank for 2 years, the same years Frank was saying Freddie and Fannie were great!
Frank is such sl*t, real conflict of interest. LOL
Imagine then with total control.

Posted by: Against total control | October 25, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

that’s why the Obammy lap dogs are out in full force in attack mode!
they’re scared shitle$$!
Posted by: Palin is the real deal | Oct 25, 2008 9:23:41 PM
LMAO you’re joking right

Posted by: Just Wondering | October 25, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

She is so dirty she wants to brek loose but the champaign won’t let her.She is a lair a crook uses her power and office to get what she wants /.Like the new gas lines she curber the bids…Got whom she wanted if that is not dirty use of office what to hey is????This woman is a time bomb just waiting to go off……………

Posted by: NH voter | October 25, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

My friends my friends I know you are hurting and I know some of you are homeless and I know others cant really keep it all together but I can fix it.
My friends its hard on you the cost of gas caused by speculation and greed and a relaxation of the rules that I supported in congress hurts us all I mean if you think filling the car is expensive it cost cindy a fortune to fill up the corporate jet.
After all my friends 4 to 6 million a years isn’t what it used to be
My friends just the other day Cindy had to pay 300k for a dress and you Know Sarah the hockey mom had to buy 150k worth of clothes yes and my loafers cost 300 but I know your pain.
We must not let Obama in my friends because he would tax me higher and my friends as well a redistribute the wealth downwards and as we all know it supposed to go upwards, because I’m up there.
My friends I can keep you safe, our southern border leaks like a sieve but dont worry about that we will win in Iraq although it has cost us 1 trillion, a whole lot of dead and injured and more with broken families dont worry we will win. We can print more money and bring in the draft if needed we’ve got lots more good republicans to use as cannon fodder.
My friends I’m battle tested I sat in a plane on an aircraft carrier so I know what its like my friends my friends blah blah blah

Posted by: Alex P | October 25, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

It is amazing to me that I hear so many people say every year, “We just need someone like us in Washington. I would love to just have an average person there that could really identify with me!” Then, we get an opportunity and all we do is whine, complain and butcher the one we get! What a bunch of Israelites we are in this country. We actually deserve Obama, but I’m still praying God’s grace will never allow that to happen. Sarah Palin is the closest to being the everyday citizen that we’ve had come along in a very long time (that made it this far!) She is who we have asked for. Now, go out and show your support with a vote for McCain/Palin so we can actually have someone at the Whitehouse that really understands our issues and can truly represent YOU!

Posted by: RoseyinIowa | October 25, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

All of this dirty talk, the Republican right love it. Talk dirty, talk dirty. I love when you say those “isms” about the Obama. “ism, ism, ism, ism”. Ahhh…
Mrs Palin is lost in her own narrow world with a dictionary that has about 200 words and that’s it. And most of those words have Rovian definitions. Mrs. Palin has her own rap without rhythm. “Obama ism”, Democrat ism, Terrorist ism, end of rich elite ism, Armegedon ism, world of gay ism”. Oh, what an Obama world.

Posted by: lucy2008 | October 25, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Well some people seem to think you cant trust Obama. I wonder who these people are. There is no guarantee of who you are reading on these blogs. They might just be concerned citizens, or they might be muslims, or russians, or anyone who would want to subvert the U.S. by making McCain win. They might want McCain to win so that Caribou Barbie would be one step away from POTUS and make us weak to an attack. However, we all know who Andy Griffith is, and Ron Howard, these are two guys weve know to be genuine Americans, and true patriots. Andy doesnt support communism, in fact he stood against it all those years! I doubt very much that Andy Griffith would have a muslim agenda, nor would Ron Howard seek to put America in a weak position. So dont listen to what these unknown enemies of America say negative about him, instead listen to those you know, and can trust and Andy and Ron have spoken out and they support Barack Obama for POTUS, because they want us to be strong like weve always been. So vote Obama and make Andy proud! Obama/Biden, as American as apple pie!

Posted by: Fairfax | October 25, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

You Obama supporters are about, or may have already, voted for a socialist communist leaning liar. Did you read Obama’s Dreams From My Father? In it he writes about visiting with Frank Marshall Davis, the poet, in Hawaii, together they read poetry and Frank was full of hard earned knowledge and ADVICE. FRANK WAS A COMMUNIST, SUBSERVIENT TO THE SOVIET UNION. GOGGLE FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS AND READ OBAMA’S BOOK. OBAMA WROTE THAT HE WENT TO SOCIALIST CONFERENCES. “REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH” said by Obama and Karl Marx!!!

Posted by: Julius McFarland | October 25, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid: guess which 3 are socialist? You gonna vote for Obama??? Socialism is closing in and communist is not far behind.

Posted by: Julius McFarland | October 25, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

These blogs have made me realize how far you christians have strayed from the teachings of Jesus.
You pick and choose what scriptures suits your agenda and ignore everything else.
If you are really what you claim to be and want to use the Bible as authoritative why don’t you do what it says and use the entire book rightly divided.
Or better yet action speaks louder than words.
Or even better yet,if your gonna talk the talk,walk the walk.
Regardless of what those over-paid motivational speakers tell you Jesus never intended to start a political movement.

Posted by: gettingtired1955 | October 25, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

LOL…John McCain and Sarah Palin remind me of what Harry Truman once said about Richard Nixon…”He’s the only man in the history of this country to run for high office talking out both sides of his mouth…and lying out of both damn sides…”

Posted by: FranklyMyDear | October 25, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Posted by: ROC2341 | Oct 25, 2008 9:19:22 PM
Gov.Palin is awesome indeed. I just came back home from her rally here in Ft. Wayne.20 thousand people packed the place to meet her and listening to her.
Sarah you are a real inspiration to many women and men, to me, my daughters and all the people that got to see a true leader tonight.
We’ll vote for you.
What??? You want your daughter to be pregnant at 17 years old? You want your daughter to take over 5 years at 4 different crappy colleges to obtain a degree in journalism? You want your daughter to cheat on her husband with her business partner? You want her to be a racist, so blinded by religion, she believes she is free of witches and that God manipulates elections? Be so ignorant she doesn’t realize fruit flies are used for genomic research related to autism?
She is ignorant, extremist, and cocky. Anyone who could think highly of this woman is an idiot.

Posted by: FreeYourMind | October 25, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

If indeed our Framers had aimed to found a Christian republic, it would seem highly unlikely that they would have forgotten to leave out their Christian intentions in the Supreme law of the land. In fact, nowhere in the Constitution do we have a single mention of Christianity, God, Jesus, or any Supreme Being. There occurs only two references to religion and they both use exclusionary wording. The 1st Amendment’s says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. . .” and in Article VI, Section 3, “. . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”
Thomas Jefferson interpreted the 1st Amendment in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in January 1, 1802:
“I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between church and State.”
Some Religious activists try to extricate the concept of separation between church and State by claiming that those words do not occur in the Constitution. Indeed they do not, but neither does it exactly say “freedom of religion,” yet the First Amendment implies both.

Posted by: gettingtired1955 | October 25, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

“What??? You want your daughter to be pregnant at 17 years old?
Anyone who could think highly of this woman is an idiot.”
Posted by: FreeYourMind | Oct 25, 2008 10:15:33 PM
————————————— DON’T THINK HIGHLY OF YOUR DAUGHTER, SHE WAS A LOUSY PIECE OF A$$

Posted by: robo | October 25, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

WITLESS FROM WASILLA strikes again. My hope is that in 10 days she goes back to Alaska and takes her American Taliban supporters with her.
Quite seriously, if McCain is elected he should “watch his back”. Clearly, “Witless” thinks this is all about her!

Posted by: B. Bear | October 25, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Believe me they were behind the campaign worker got beaten up “lie story”. Next week and leading up to November 4, the greatest lies they can pull will be presented to get voted in. Can you trust them? Their heads have rolled off (common sense gone) an they are now like headless chickens running on wild impulse. This is America and we do happen to have a constitution guaranteeing freedoms!

Posted by: stephanie | October 25, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Janet- If you would rather live in a socialist country, then by all means, move. If we become a socialist nation, we will NEVER be the nation we once were. If McCain/Palin win, at the most you will have to live through 8 years. If Obama/Biden win, you will be living with socialism FOREVER. And THAT is not worth it to me and anyone else who believes in the Constitution of this country.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 25, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Hilary Smith – if Obama wins, we will be lucky if we can barely survive. Unfortunately, there are too many people alive today who were NOT alive during the socialist/communist era of the USSR. The people in those countries never had enough food. They never had enough clothing. They lived multiple families in cramped apartments. THAT is what you are condemning us to if you vote for Obama.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | October 25, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

–>> To All Of You – Who Love (Diva/Caribo-Barbi/Pay Me Big Bucks Sarah) It’s Because You Have NOT Personally Checked Out –>
(The Real Sarah and Todd Palin Scandals also –> Please Check Out (The Ultimate Sarah Palin Is UNFIT To Be The V.P. List. Plus –> (Wasilla is The Crystal Meth Capital Of Alaska) Plus –> (That Special Needs Baby-Trig Is NOTTTT Sarah P.’s Baby -It’s Her Grand Son) – (Bristol P. is the Real mother + She is Pg W/her 2nd baby!)–>Plus,Hockey Gate-and SO MANY – MANY – MORE MAJOR SCANDALS All Put Out By The People In Her Home Town Wasilla & Rest Of Alaska!
Ck OUT>>(Defenders Of Wildlife Action Fund – Endorsed Obama/Biden – 9/12th/08)

Posted by: Arianna D. | October 25, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

I predict an Obama victory will put America back on the map as a world leader and the economy will regain strength to an unprecedented level beyond the Clinton administration…God given wisdom brings good results. No more idiots please..

Posted by: Wanda | October 25, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Quote:”America’s standing in the world is at an all time low. The country is in financial ruin, lost jobs, our 401k is vanishing righ before our eyes. Millions in home foreclosure. The country is in a recession. Republicans are good at sreadding hate and fear to the American public.”
HA HA HA HA HA HA
OMG…Anybody else see the irony in that?…the Libs are spreading gloom and doom and accusing the Republicans of fear mongering! Actually, judging by the grammar that guy probably isn’t even an American.
The Republicans are looking to a brighter future for our entire country, not just for the ‘poor’ that the Liberal Dems and various political hacks on the Fringe have kept that way for decades-Prosperity does the Left no good whatsoever…only the false promise of getting it from the rich.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 25, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

UNLESS YOU HAVE PERSONALLY CHECKED OUT THE MAJOR SCANDALS OF SARAH & TODD PALIN
YOU HAVE ABSOLUTLY NO IDEA HOW CORRPT AND EVIL SHE IS…(BESIDES BEING PG WHEN SHE MARRIED TODD PALIN) (SARAH HAS ALSO CHEATED ON TODD W/HIS (EX)BEST FRIEND and CO-PARTNER.)(PLUS THEY TAKE TROPHIE HUNTERS OUT IN A SMALL PLANE -JUST TO SHOOT ANIMALS BY CHASING THEM DOWN – THEN SHOOTING THE ANIMALS AT POINT BLANK RANGE – JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT!)CHECK OUT – THE MAJOR SCANDALS OF THE PALINS /ALASKA. TROOPERGATE IS ONLY THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG!! SARAH & TODD PALIN -> ARE HATED BY “THE DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE ACTION FUND!”(BUT,THEY TOTALLY ENDORSED –>> OBAMA /BIDEN 9/12th/08… SARAH GO BACK.. NORTH TO ALASKA — (ANYONE WHO DOESN’T LIKE OBAMA – PLEASE JUST DO NOTTTTTT VOTE FOR McSAME!)

Posted by: Arianna | October 25, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

This is what “unchecked power” really looks like:
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/16/confess/

Posted by: splinter | October 25, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Quote: “The Republicans are looking to a brighter future for our entire country, not just for the ‘poor’ that the Liberal Dems and various political hacks on the Fringe have kept that way for decades-Prosperity does the Left no good whatsoever…only the false promise of getting it from the rich.”
The Republicans are responsible for driving the American Empire to the brink of collapse!
With your lies to start illegal wars, your fear mongering to scare America into giving up its civil liberties, your isolating of our allies, your economic policies built upon deregulated corporate greed and corruption, your disgusting use of religion to dupe the ignorant into believing you do Gods will, and your exclusionary racism–how dare you suggest Republicans are looking to a brighter future.
Then you have the nerve to speak out against a Harvard educated, self-made family man who is the epitome of intelligence, hard work, and the American dream, and parade around an ignoramus from an Alaskan trailer park and say, “this person is better than you…”

Posted by: FreeYourMind | October 25, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“Let’s vote for change. Let’s undo what we did in 2006″
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/the_last_two_years.html

Posted by: Natasha | October 25, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

RoseyinIowa:
“It is amazing to me that I hear so many people say every year, “We just need someone like us in Washington. I would love to just have an average person there that could really identify with me!” Then, we get an opportunity and all we do is whine, complain and butcher the one we get!”
Well Sarah Palin reminds those people that there is a very good reason reason why “someone like us” is not in washington. Average people are completely unsuited for the job. She’s “just like us” all the way to the sense that she can not possibly be anything remotely like a good leader. Hell, she also reminds us that “people like us” are also capable of being corrupt liars.
You might say she is TOO MUCH like us… we need someone who is like us but has strong intelligence, honesty and would make a good leader (a pipe dream perhaps as such people for some reason never get into politics). Sarah palin is much like us and she’s just as bad as leadership as the rest of us and more than capable of lying and abusing the system.

Posted by: Monte | October 25, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

O.M.G. I HONESTLY DIDN’T KNOW ALOT ABOUT THE PALINS, TIL AFTER I CK’ED OUT THE DIFFERENT WEBSITES,”HOCKEYGATE” AND “WASILLA… THE CRYSTAL METH CAPITAL OF ALASKA” I ALSO DIDN’T KNOW,ABOUT (ALL) THE SARAH AND TODD PALIN SCANDALS,UNTIL I PERSONALLY C’KED OUT THE DIFFERENT WEBSITES – “THE ULTIMATE SARAH PALIN IS UNFIT TO BE THE V.P. LIST”…I MEAN MAN,SERIOUSLY,I HAD NO IDEA,UNTIL JUST NOW…
(MAN THAT SARAH P. BROAD IS CRAZY A** CORRUPT AND YOU WILL NOT BELIEVE HOW MANY MILLIONS OF $$$$$$$$$ SHE HAS TAKEN FROM THE POOR PEOPLE OF ALASKA!!!
ALSO SHE AND TODD,WERE/ARE MEMBERS OF THE A.I.P.(ALASKA INDEPENDENT PARTY) –THAT’S WHY SHE IS SO BUSY LYING ABOUT OBAMA & SOOOOO H*LL BENT TO GET McCAIN INTO THE WHITE HOUSE-(SHE REALLY WANTS TO BE MADAM PRESIDENT SOOOOO BAD ESP.IF McCAIN KICKS THE BUCKET! IN FACT SHE MAKES MONICA LEWINSKY-LOOK LIKE A GIRL SCOUT!… HEY (NO KIDDING) LOOK UP THE SCANDALS OF THE PALINS- WEBSITE!!!
I ALMOST VOTED FOR HER – THANK GOD,FOR ALL THE WEBSITES.(I AM NOW – FOR SURE VOTING FOR OBAMA /BIDEN- AMERICA’S ONLY REAL HOPE!! WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER 4-8 YRS OF BUSHISM’S – NOR THE CORRUPT C.E.O.’s OF WALL STREET – ALSO LET’S GET OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST- A.S.A.P.- BUT,SAFELY!! REMEMBER COLIN POWELL + THE DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE,AND THE CLINTONS ALSO ENDORSED HIM, AS WELL THE AVERAGE PEOPLE ON MAIN STREET– OF YOU DO NOT LIKE OBAMA,GO LIVE IN SOME OTHER COUNTRY– BECAUSE ONLY THE SMART PEOPLE HERE IN THE U.S.A. WILL BE VOTING FOR OBAMA/BIDEN!! (AFTER THE LAST 8 YEARS–NO MORE BUSH OR STUPID -> MENTAL MIGETS WHO THINK LIKE BUSH – KIND OF PEOPLE! (REMEMBER; McCAIN THOUGHT LIKE AND VOTED LIKE BUSH 90% OF THE TIME – McCAIN HIMSELF SAID SO!!)

Posted by: i am NO Longer, Voting For Sarah/McCain!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | October 25, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Yes, I have the nerve to speak out against anyone…or is that not allowed any more in the American People’s Republic?
If you want to spread lies about the Republicans, go ahead. But anyone who isn’t drinking the Liberal Kool-Aid knows darn well that it has been the Liberal Commies with their social engineering that have made an economic mess real fast-tying down billions of dollars spidering throughout the world economy because of their Marxist chicken in every pot mentality with these mortgages and the mismanagement of these GSEs (that shouldn’t even exist in the first place-except maybe in Red China or some other such Socialist Paradise).
Amazing-blame wars on Republicans when was necessitated by a dictator seeking nuclear weapons and control of the Middle East, and another because of Islamic terrorists. Also, ignore that everyone from Generalissimo Powell to Hillary-Rodham Clinton agreed with and promoted those actions. Your assumptions of stupidity on our part does not miraculously materialize into reality-sorry.
1968 has come and gone-get over it, move on. Talk about living in the past…good grief.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 25, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

We have had this for the last 8 years I wonder were Sara has been. With Mr. Bush it was his way or no way and if you didn’t think his way you were a terrorist. At Least now we will have someone working for USA not Iraq and OIl

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 25, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

We have had this for the last 8 years I wonder were Sara has been. With Mr. Bush it was his way or no way and if you didn’t think his way you were a terrorist. At Least now we will have someone working for USA not Iraq and OIl

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 25, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Yea Yea look what happened when the repubs had control of the whole ball got us in a freaking war that’s what and in debt so bad your 9 greats grand children will be paying it off wake up America I sure don’t want my health care benefits cut and since I am 66 and on medicare it will be under Mc bush. I had a heart attack and my medication ain’t cheap. With 4 more years of republicans this country may as well bend over and kiss its backside good bye

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | October 25, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

No, we’ve had this over the last 2 years since Nancy Pelosi and the Wrecking Crew took over. We had for all practical purposes zero unemployment, the economy was on the upswing despite the .com bust under Clinton and 9-11.
Two years-all it took…Oh, let’s be fair, I apologize…let’s go all the way back to 1938 under Socialist Pope FDR I and the installation of Fannie Mae. I guess that’s really where this mess began.
Wars, huh…how about JFK/Johnson and Vietnam? Guess you all forgot about that. How about Clinton and Bosnia and Somali? Ring any bells? Maybe Truman and Korea? FDR and World War II? No? Didn’t think so. Too busy focusing on your own version of historical reality.
Turn off the Daily Show and pick up a (nonfiction) book now and again for God’s sake.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 26, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Don’t be ignorant about the ACORN garbage being sold to you. They’ve been demonized and you numb-minded drones eat it up. A relatively few deadbeats hired off the street by ACORN to register voters turned in bad records. Those records will be tossed at the polls.
That’s it, dittoheads, that’s the whole awful story. ACORN is not the devil. They do good work for poor people. Like Christians are supposed to do? When did you help the poor last? If you’re a Christian and you’re not helping the poor, you’re ignoring the words of Christ. You have no right to cast stones at an organization that does help the poor, even if they make mistakes.
Actually, your boy McCain collected seven million dollars in illegal campaign donations–broke the law, for real. Is McCain the devil? You silly-minded sheep are so easily led. That’s why our nation is in such a mess. Use your brains or stay home on Nov. 4. You’re doing more harm than good following blind ideology and voting based on innuendo and manipulation by people who want to use you. And they do use you, as often as they can. If you want to look in that direction, you’re more likely to find the devilish behavior you dread so much. It’s your own side, your “leaders,” conning you for their selfish ends. Wake up. When they tell you (again) that it’s good to give all the tax breaks to wealthy people like themselves and leave you basically nothing, or to continue deregulating (McCain is STILL pushing deregulation!), how can you possibly continue to believe them? Do you buy “Rolexes” from guys off the corner, too?
I hope and pray that our new president, Barack Obama can bring a little unity, and sanity, to this messed-up politics we’ve got going. We’ll see–he certainly can’t do it alone. One thing’s for sure: he didn’t support GWB 90% of the time for the past eight years. I pray that those who call themselves “loyal Americans” will support the man elected by the people. That’s democracy, the American Way. If you don’t at least give him the benefit of the doubt, you’re being disloyal to your country.
Dump the hate, stop making rumors the basis of your politics. Ignorance is not an attractive quality.

Posted by: dmw | October 26, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

OMG…Sarah Palin Is Now… Finally Pimping Her-Lil Piper – To Play The SOOOOOO Cutsey Card (after Sarah Palin first – Pimping her pregant daughter)then her son going to Irag,then using… (Bristol’s “Special Needs” Baby Trig”)-Bristol is preggers w/her 2nd baby! YESSSS >> Sarah Palin lied to the whole world – It Is Her “Grand Son”-Not Her Own Son!!!) (Plus Sooooo Very/ Very Much More – Major Scandals about The Palins…Ck out (The Palins Scandals/Alaska Websites – Put Out By The People Of Wasilla & Alaska!!!!)

Posted by: Andy & Opie Taylor & The Fonz All Are Rooting For Obama / Biden - That's American | October 26, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

So What? From where we are now, we can only go up!! And who would know better about abuse of power than Sarah?

Posted by: akskimo | October 26, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

“Barack Obama can bring a little unity, and sanity, to this messed-up politics we’ve got going. We’ll see–he certainly can’t do it alone. One thing’s for sure: he didn’t support GWB 90% of the time for the past eight years.”
So you admit that Obama couldn’t support our President in much of anything? Oh, yeah, that’s real ‘unity’, huh?
So, ACORN and other Socialist organizations are ‘like’ Christians? Just what I thought…replacing religion with the new Leftist opiates of the masses called ‘moral equivalency’, ‘secular progressivism’ and ‘social engineering’.
Who needs God and various religious teachings when you have the great Democratic Party of the U.S. of A. and their ideologies?

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 26, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Final bill on the Barackopolis: $5.3 million.
Under those circumstances, the extra $5.3 million for the vanity platform at Invesco seems like a strange and very frivolous spending choice. Obama could have given the same (uninspiring) speech at the Pepsi Center and saved millions of dollars. This isn’t the same as buying a wardrobe for a candidate who lacked one; Democrats had already spent almost $15 million on the Pepsi Center. Obama had a perfectly good stage on which to accept his nomination and demanded another for his own ego.
Joe

Posted by: Joe | October 26, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Spend 30 minutes reading this series of articles in Investor’s Business Daily (IBD) on Sen. Obama. It will bring real meaning to his coment to Joe the Plumber about sharing the wealth.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series8.aspx
Barack Obama has styled himself a centrist, but does his record support that claim?
In this series, we examine Senator Obama’s past, his voting record and the people who’ve served as his advisers and mentors over the years. We’ll show how the facts of Obama’s actions and associations reveal a far more left-leaning tilt to his background — and to his politics.
Joe

Posted by: Joe | October 26, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

But the subprime crisis Washington is dealing with is the result of three decades of the federal government pressuring banks — via the regulatory demands of the Democrats’ 1977 Community Reinvestment Act, which was expanded by Bill Clinton — to make tens of billions of dollars in bad loans to poor people with lousy credit ratings.
It was Democrats’ regulatory and litigious assaults upon the mortgage market in pursuit of “social justice” that left our economy in its precarious position of today; indeed as an attorney, Obama himself in 1994 represented a client suing Citibank, accusing it of systematically denying mortgages to blacks.
But if the taxpayer rescue of Wall Street and Uncle Sam’s taking over the banking system scares you, the broader socialism planned by the Democratic presidential nominee should leave you petrified.
Joe

Posted by: Joe | October 26, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

In his 1995 memoir, Obama said he wanted to go to Harvard Law School to “learn power’s currency in all its intricacy,” with the goal of “making large-scale change” as a national politician. But he needed to get there first. So Obama approached McKnight to write a letter of recommendation, which he did.
Being tutored by McKnight and other Alinsky disciples, Obama said while campaigning in Iowa last year, was “the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School.
Obama waited five years to apply to Harvard. As WorldNetDaily reports, from 1985 to 1988, he worked for a subsidiary of the Chicago-based Gamaliel Foundation, founded on the principles of Saul “The Red” Alinsky. He worked as a consultant and trainer. On the board of Gamaliel sat Northwestern University professor John L. McKnight, a student of Alinsky’s radical tactics. While at Gamaliel, McKnight became Obama’s mentor in community organizing.
Joe

Posted by: Joe | October 26, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Who woulda thunk that a simple, well-meaning concept like trying to help people have homes would have turned into such a disaster?
Hey, I got it! How about lowering taxes so that people will (especially those that control most of the capital) invest and bank their money, expand businesses, and hire people to help them get even richer?
Oh, wait,,,that’s called ‘Trickle down’ and doesn’t work.
How dumb of me…I keep forgetting that it’s been Socialism (and Islam) all along that’s made this country great and wealthy. Thank you Karl and Friedrich…we owe you a cold one.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 26, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Haven’t we had just about enough fear-mongering from our government? Do we really need this woman terrorizing our citizens with the communist boogie man?
People are “worried about” and “scared of” Obama?
Apparently, ignorance is not bliss…it’s terrifying.

Posted by: tom | October 26, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

“Unchecked power”??! What about the the period from 2003 to 2007 where President Bush was in office and Republicans held both houses of congress?
I believe we went to war in 2003. How’s that for dangerous?

Posted by: Kevin | October 26, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Yes, the tax plan presented by Obama is socialistic. We have a pot called the IRS. It is supposed to collect taxes, not give checks to those who don’t put into the pot. Free money is called welfare, and I would prefer for people to have to continue to go and apply for welfare. Never before has the govt. sent people free money through the IRS. It is blatantly socialistic.

Posted by: Granny | October 26, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Raise taxes on wealthy. OK.
Raise taxes on corporations. OK.
Middle class tax cuts. OK.
Give people free money. WHAT???
Let’s not turn the IRS into another social program. We already have those.

Posted by: Granny | October 26, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

If we have an all democratic government, we may get much more than what we may think. Joe Biden said Obama will be tested for sure, and if the terrorist will destroy a few big oil tankers in the open sea, that will destroy all our economy, we would also go into big depression and a lot of upset.All of Obama’s background and all his past assosiations are American haters, muslim redicals, Marxist, black supremists. We may get an all democratic, unamerican, Marxist, black supremist governmet,with more problems for the American people.Joe Biden said, we are not going to like what is ahead, and he assured us, of all this.

Posted by: Wolf | October 26, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I didn’t hear the GOP complaining when they had control of all three branches of government for SIX years that led us into the mess we’re in now.
Now, Palin and team are all up in arms that Obama might (and most likely will) win Nov 4th and the Democrats will pick up several seats in Congress.
Talk about hypocrosy at its best.

Posted by: Wendy, Denver | October 26, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Republicans have had 6 years of unchecked power.2000-06 .Bush and Chaney took our liberties away. Strange argument. Republican fascism.
I think the homeless hundreds of thousands of Americans would like to hear that their government and fellow Americans would embrace and help them. This is WHY WE ARE A GREAT NATION…nothing to do with communism. Palin still does not get that she is creating a dangerous environment working up fear is so many ill informed citizens with guns…SO IRRESPONSIBLE.
Palin is very unnerving suggesting communism???? Ridiculous and shallow at such horrible economic time.
Please…go GET OUT THE VOTE and wear your Obama buttons…it is not over until it is over…

Posted by: mamabear | October 26, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

kevin…I believe that’s the point…No checks and balances is dangerous no matter what side is in control..Did we not learn our lesson from the period you mentioned..BTW the dems took the House and Senate in November of 2006….

Posted by: curiousindep | October 26, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Will the neo-communists censor the Net?
Anybody who is listening or reading knows that a President Barack Obama would yank America toward socialism by the largest margin since FDR’s New Deal. Thanks to Joe the plumber, we know Obama wants to redistribute wealth, spread it around like it belongs to the government instead of the people who earned it.
Draconian tax increases are just the tip of the socialistic agenda Obama has waiting for us. Obama’s cheerleaders, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and other leftists, plan an all-out assault on the First Amendment. Sadly, that doesn’t mean that they’re going to cease the unending gaseous gaffes. Instead, it means they want to go back to pre-Ronald Reagan days when the government controlled what was said on radio and TV.
The Democrats, as they did in 1934 prompted by FDR, want to re-enact the Fairness Doctrine, which has nothing to do with fairness in communication. This doctrine simply allows the government to decide whose speech is free and whose isn’t. It forced broadcasters to give equal time to what the government deemed were opposing views.
President Ronald Reagan saw the evil behind the Fairness Doctrine and vetoed a bill in 1987 that would have made it law. The bellyaching from the far left has persisted since then, especially since my friend Rush Limbaugh saved AM radio with his style of talk radio. Thin-skinned liberals can’t take Rush’s straight talk, so they want to shut him down. That’s why some call the latest push for the doctrine the Hush Rush law.
I know this sounds like something from Nazi Germany or Castro’s Cuba, but it’s already in the hopper. New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman let the cat out of the bag about the left’s plans to silence its dissenters, according to Brian Maloney of Radio Equalizer.
“With the possibility of a Democratic Party supermajority after the upcoming elections, Jeff Bingaman may soon get his wish to quash dissenting viewpoints,” Maloney reports. ”During an interview with KKOB Albuquerque host Jim Villanucci, Bingaman overtly stated his full support for imposing Fairness Doctrine restrictions on free speech which would effectively shut down talk radio as we know it today.”
If the leftists succeed under the nightmare scenario with Obama in the White House, this time it won’t just be about radio and TV, but could include content on the Internet. You got it – the jackbooted thugs from the left will monitor what you and I write on the Web and let us have it if they don’t think it’s “fair.”
Jeff Poor of NewsBusters wrote about this scary socialistic scheme, reporting that FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell ventured that the feds under the governmental Democratic trifecta (presidency and both houses of Congress) could thrust itself into regulating speech on the Internet.
“He told the Business & Media Institute there’s a possibility the next Congress and administration might attempt to package the renewal of the Fairness Doctrine with Net neutrality regulation,” Poor wrote.
“‘I think the fear is that somehow large corporations will censor their content, their points of view,’ McDowell said, suggesting some conservatives might support Net neutrality legislation based on corporate censorship fears. ‘I think the bigger concern for them should be if you have government dictating content policy, which by the way would have a big First Amendment problem.
“‘Then, whoever is in charge of government is going to determine what is fair, under a so-called “Fairness Doctrine,” which won’t be called that – it’ll be called something else,’ McDowell said. ‘So, will websites, will bloggers have to give equal time or equal space on their website to opposing views rather than letting the marketplace of ideas determine that?’”
The Democrats, who look more and more like neo-communists, should tread lightly here. I don’t just say that because I’ve made my living on talk radio. This is truly a First Amendment issue, so Pelosi and the rest of her minions better break out that Constitution they swore to protect and read up.
The Supreme Court did rule in an earlier day that the previous incarnation of the Fairness Doctrine was constitutional. But the Supreme Court concluded in another case that the doctrine “inescapably dampens the vigor and limits the variety of public debate (Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241),” according to an article at the Heritage Foundation.
Obama and the Democrats’ new deal is a bad deal for every American who believes in the Constitution and the First Amendment. It is a dangerous step to the left that will stifle free expression and, ultimately, democracy.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=78863

Posted by: Natasha | October 27, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Does Palin me like the Rethugs had?What a hypocrite.Please take all racist with you if Obama wins.

Posted by: Didi | October 27, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

BTW people,
Natasha actually works for THIS blog!
Yup, she’s a moderator/content “enhancer”!
That’s right!
She’s here to “spice” things up for your entertainment!
Well, not exactly. Her job is to steer the conversation, or slant it, into a particular focus that stimulates a particualr type of response.
Sadly, not only do most here fall for it, it is actually needed!

Posted by: LOL | October 27, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

What a sleazy scum bag with lipstick
Posted by: mary | Oct 25, 2008 7:34:04 PM
No she isn’t. What part of her life makes you write this? Is it the fact that she didn’t abort her son? Or is the fact that you would abort him? She has been a breath of fresh air, and you are hot air…

Posted by: Alan | October 27, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

We quickly learned that Sarah is a born-again, Spirit-filled Christian, attends church, and has been a ministry worker.
Jim
Posted by: TheBible | Oct 25, 2008 7:35:49 PM
I am with you Jim! It is God that sets up and put down, and Sarah will be attacked because she has faith. But don’t lose sight that God has sometimes allowed ungodly people to come to power…have faith that His will is what is best.

Posted by: Alan | October 27, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I for one do not want more of the same.Sarah is more of the same self proclaimed religious right, and McCain has fell lock step with that same old posturing that ONLY the republican party is capable of protecting this country.This country fell for that mess in ’04.

Posted by: TV | October 27, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Vote Democratic across the board for ’08!

Posted by: TV | October 27, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Wow! Isn’t this exciting times, the democrats will have total control to put this country back on the right track without the meddling republicans screwing things up. Finally we will be able to get congress to work again. The country will move to the middle, and what ever party that replaces the republicans will have to be one that wants to improve the country, and not one with schemes and gimmicks that only benefits the rich.
One republican Senator has been convicted for corruption, and I can see more republicans going down for the same. Just wait for Palin to get back to Alaska. They will be running her through the ringer as well.

Posted by: Independent realist | October 27, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Posted by: Carrie | October 28, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Unchecked power? You mean, like, to stop giving all our tax cuts to rich people, or to stop allowing corporations to ship jobs overseas and get REWARDED for it? Or to install Supreme Court judges who don’t think sex discrimination should be ignored if a woman complains “too late”? Or to finally get a renewable-energy program in place that provides new jobs and gets us off oil?
Sounds like a great use of unchecked power to me. Let’s give that a try, shall we?

Posted by: dmw | October 28, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

I ask the American People why is Gov.
Palin blowing her own horn? She makes
comments to the American citizens
about “Joe the plumber” and “Tito
the builder” but is Gov. Palin really
for the middle class American?
She proclaims to be down to earth
but charges her campaign duds to
Saks and Neiman Marcus. After the
press released her outrageous purchases
on campaign funds from American
contributors who give their last
buck or so for her to spend it
on clothes and make-up. I ask what
type of “born-again Christian” would
do such a thing that she accuses
others of. They say take the
plank out of your own eyes, before you
cast stones at your brother. Is that
what Gov. Palin is doing in her
campaign speeches? And what about this
crazy McCain worker who lies about
an African-American attacking her
and scarving a “b” on her cheek.
McCain should just throw in the towel
and admit that he’s not for the
average middle class guy especially
when he mocking Obama of spreading
the wealth! Have you heard if
McClain is interesting in helping
out the middle class American?
We have seen time and time again where
McCain has voted 90% of the time with
President Bush over his other Republician Senators. Folks honestly
speaking the next time you seen an
advertisement for the McClain/Palin
Presidency look into his eyes and see
the reality of what these folks are
all about.

Posted by: Reality Check | October 28, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Posted by: Carrie | October 28, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.