Palin’s Switcheroo on Feminism
ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: Does Sarah Palin consider herself a feminist? It depends who is asking the question.
In an interview on NBC Nightly News that aired Thursday, Brian Williams asked Palin: "Governor, are you a feminist?"
"I’m not gonna label myself anything, Brian," said Palin. "And I think that’s what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different . . . I’m not going to put a label on myself."
While Palin refused to label herself anything while talking to NBC News, she proudly donned the feminist mantle during a recent interview with CBS News.
During her interview with CBS News’ Katie Couric, Palin was asked, "Do you consider yourself a feminist?"
"I do," said Palin. " I’m a feminist who believes in equal rights and I believe that women certainly today have every opportunity that a man has to succeed, and to try to do it all, anyway."
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
“I’m not gonna label myself anything, Brian,” said Palin. “And I think that’s what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different . . . I’m not going to put a label on myself.”
Gee, so you won’t give press conferences, the campaign is hiding you from answering any kind of meaningful questions, and you refuse to state where you stand on issues that most women would like to know, and yet you want us to vote for you based on what, your looks?
What an insult to America.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 24, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
And now she thinks shes beeing treated ‘unfair’ by the press because she shopped clothes for $ 150 000 and refers to Hillary.
Except that Palin called Hillary a whiner during the primaries. What a f*** ing hypocrite.
Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 24, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Interesting that she considers herself a feminist when it suits her – like when she’s being interviewed by a female reporter. Meanwhile, her runningmate and her party do NOT believe in equal pay for women, do not protect women’s rights on a whole host of issues. And Palin’s comments about her 150,000 wardrobe are sickening in their duplicity. The attacks are because she’s female?!?! No, they’re because 150,000 is more money on clothes than any hockey mom will spend in her ENTIRE LIFE. Palin went on to say that the clothes were not worth 150,000. Really? That’s not what the receipts say, you lying twit.
One last point. This ridiculously uninformed woman has not hesitated to attack Biden and Obama at every opportunity – in the most sarcastic ways. How much have the attacked you, Palin? Or have they been respectful and courteous in their references to you? Has Obama said you’re wildly unqualified? It’s what you’ve said about him? Has Biden said you say incredibly stupid things in interviews? It’s what you’ve said about him. CHARACTER MATTERS, PALIN. I thought as a good christian you’d know this.
Posted by: jon in maryland | October 24, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
jon in maryland – you are so right. And she would never be recognized by her ‘Christian’ behavior (because being snide and nasty isn’t ‘Christian’ – I don’t know… maybe it’s Jewish? Muslim? It’s so offensive that people like her use that term to mean ‘good’ anyway.) I don’t fault her $150,000 wardrobe. Not that I buy those kinds of clothes, but they are very well made and stand up to a lot of abuse, yet remain ‘photographable’. And the shoes – having never spent much on shoes I DO know that if you have to stand in them for a long period of time some of the $$$ designers craft a pretty comfortable high heel. (I’ll stick to my Keens, though!) So on the important stuff – femminism, etc., she a fake, a liar and ‘the mean girl’ from high school. She said a lot of nasty things about Hillary, yet now will use her as an ally when she’s trying to woo the Hillary base. She should just go shoot things from a helicopter and leave us in the lower 48 (the REAL Amercia, Sarah?) alone.
Posted by: Sevres Blue | October 24, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
A feminist is simply someone who believes that women should have the same opportunities as men and be treated as equals. That means Palin is.
For other women and organisations like the NOW to say she does harm to femininists’ cause just because she doesn’t share their views on religion or abortion is madness. They are the ones who are hurting feminism by trying to couple it with their personal views on other issues.
Posted by: PJ | October 24, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
I’m as concerned about Palin being four more years of Cheney as I am about McCain being four more years of Bush policies. Cheney has hidden behind a wall of secrecy, from his energy meetings, saber rattling with Iran, protection from any misconduct (executive or legislative; you can’t be both) and his constant lie about Iraq being associated with Al quada. Palin is in a ‘bubble’ and is already yielding power by denial, changing her position and attacking while shamelessly accepting every inappropriate form of public funds available.
Posted by: Robert Dent | October 24, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Palin has fallen into the trap of being thrust onto the national scene while being woefully unprepared. Put Hillary Clinton in her position and the questions would receive answers (whether one agreed with the answer or not)and the major issues would be broached. Thanks, McCain. Due to your poor decision-making we all have to suffer this public debacle … until Nov. 4th when we can wish you “farewell”.
Posted by: gtrmaniac49 | October 24, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
I can’t wait until after 11.4.08 which Palin can go back to Alaska. She’s a disgrace to women everywhere. The evilness that is coming out of the RNC is just appalling. An RNC opinion poll called me last night to see if they could ‘count on my vote’ – I said HELL NO!
Posted by: Sick of it all | October 24, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
I had not thought ridiculous questions like these were part of being a candidate. Why not ask ;thongs or standard?
Looks like you guys could go after what a candidate really thinks; Mr. Obama, is redistribution really just another term for a politician taking money from someone else to spend on his or her “pet projects”?
Ms. Palin,now that oil prices are dropping what will Alaska do for revenue and what will you do when oil field workers have no jobs.
Joe, what did you mean when you said that the US would be tested within 6 months of an Obama administration and that your response to that crisis would not be popular.
Mr.McCain, why did you oppose President Bush’s tax cuts in 2000 but now embrace them?
And there are more: what would you do to keep 25% of kids from dropping out of school?Why is the 35 to 40% of a middle income earners pay check not enough to fund the Government? If a windfall tax on companies is in order, how will you help them when they lose money?Will you investigate members of your own party for their roles in the mortgage scandals? Why did you take money for your campaign from XYZ company? If you haven’t released health and school records , will you? What are your previous successes and failures?
See, there are many questions you could ask but don’t.
Why?
Posted by: david | October 24, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am
Ok so now shes not a feminist, because her boss the misogynist is sitting beside her. Before when it was just her and the girls she was a feminist. Flipper! And isnt it interesting she isnt so much into labels now, and even mentioned that “parts of the country” shouldnt recieve labels, but it wasnt long ago that she was calling “parts of the country” pro american?
Posted by: mitch | October 24, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am
By any rational definition of the word ‘feminist’, she is one by her accomplishments rather than by the mere rhetoric of most self-labeled feminists.
Posted by: Tyrone | October 24, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
I see Sarah Palin as an anti-femminist, an example of an unqualified woman who was chosen, in part, because she was a woman. To me, the great tragedy of this election is that John McCain passed over all the truly qualified GOP women and chose Sarah Palin.
Posted by: JAB | October 24, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Did she actually say “I’m not gonna label myself anything…” Please explain the maverick and reformer labels, not to mention Pro-America, Anti-America and the “Socialist” title you labeled the Democratic Candidate? Where’s an easy button when you need one…
Posted by: Martin | October 24, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Jill.. the ‘socialist’ thing was last week, this week it’s ‘just like bush’.. guess you missed that memo.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 24, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am
Someone refresh my memory: Has anyone asked any of the other candidates if they’re feminists?
Posted by: CarolStrick | October 24, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Obama is more of a feminist than the moose hunter! He has fought for equal rights all his adult life. this woman is a pathetic joke and most likely won’t have a job when she goes back to alaska in november.
Posted by: dnc | October 24, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Caribou Barbie should be investigated for child abuse. No infant should be used as a prop at politcal rallies, especially late at night. Feminist? She should look up what it means to be a responsible mother.
Posted by: Joe V | October 24, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
who really cares
Posted by: tina | October 24, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Palin is an extravagant out of touch woman. She is using the tax payers 84million dollars wrongly and against the constitution. She is out of touch and extravagant.
Posted by: Hockeymum | October 24, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Carolstick, How is the SS administration doing these days?
Posted by: mitch | October 24, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Did they ask Biden the same question? Has anyone asked Biden anything? Where is Joe Biden? Who is Joe Biden?
I remember Joe Biden a few months ago when he echoed Hillary Clinton’s assessment that Sen Obama isn’t ready to handle the “3 AM phone call”. Now Biden is saying that Obama is weak enough to invite the “3AM phone call.”
Maybe that’s why they aren’t letting Biden talk. He admits that his new boss won’t be able to handle the job.
Poor Joe, Levi Johnston gets more press coverage than Joe Biden.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Palin is feminine. The word feminist is a relatively new word for women who wants to be more like men. They want their cake and eat it too.
Posted by: Fran | October 24, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Jill.. Did you hear about Senator Obama being a terrorist, Marxist, elitist, Muslim (Which doesn’t matter), Communist and Anti-American, stop believing everything posted on the internet and mentioned during the campaign…
Posted by: Martin | October 24, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
THIS WOMAN IS SO CONFUSED. SHE DONT KNOW WHAT TO SAY.. SHE DONT EVEN KNOW THE JOB OF A VICE PRESIDENT.. WOW!!! NOW I WILL BE VERY SCARED FOR THIS COUNTRY IF SHE WAS PRESIDENT 1 DAY. HOW COULD SHE BE A FEMINST AND HER SO CALLED PRESIDENT IS NOT FOR FEMINIST. THIS IS SO FUNNY… DID MCCAIN EVEN TALK TO PALIN BEFORE HE PUT HER UP FOR THE VP SPOT… GOD BLESS AMERICA!!
Posted by: chante | October 24, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
I don’t care what Palin calls herself as long as it isn’t Vice President or President.
Posted by: JR | October 24, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
She IS being treated like crap in the media…and exactly-where the heck is Joe Biden-we see more of the plumber guy!
Posted by: deb | October 24, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Folks, just because she isn’t ugly like your feminist girlfriends doesn’t mean she isn’t a feminist. Feminism isn’t only for uggo’s.
Posted by: Michael | October 24, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
It’s actually an interesting question, I think. Today women who are stay at home moms consider themselves feminists because they have good degreees and careers but have the choice of staying at home for a few years to be with their kids. Palin doesn’t have a strong educational background but she certainly has a good career. I’d call Palin an Evangelical Feminist (if there is such a term.) She has done well in her career but she is not in favor of equal rights for women in terms of reproductive freedom. Anyone that can say with a straight face that they are “unapologetically against abortion” in the event of a child that has been impregnated by incestuous rape is not only against womens rights but against childrens rights as well. But if being an Evangelical Feminist means that she has achieved a lot in her career and has used her power to force her religious views into the political arena – well then she fits the bill. You betcha. I love how she came out in favor of a federal ban on gay marriage. So much for separation of church and state and limiting the power of the federal governemt. I guess those concepts only apply when they pertain to issues that she does not find morally reprehensible, right Gov Palin? Also, Gov. Schwarzenegger seems to be the latest coming out publically and saying she isn’t ready. She will never be ready.
Posted by: voted early for Obama in Florida | October 24, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Martin
Obama is a Marxist.. Don’t know or care about him being a muslim but Marxism is worrisome.
We spent the last 50 years fighting against Marxists and have of you want to elect one because you are jealous of the wealthy.
It’s called playing into their hands.
Posted by: Michael | October 24, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Hopefully Sarah Palin is a feminist with view to all these misogynists in the States!
Obama did not even bother to put a woman on the ticket, Obama is so old fashioned with his housewive at home, I wonder why Michelle did a degree if her only occupation is to look after kids, why does Obama not look after his kids, shame on him and although McCain is older, Obama is old-fashioned and McCain progressive, come to Europe, Sarah and John, we could do with good politicians here!!!!!
Posted by: Gina | October 24, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Less than a hundred years ago, women were spat upon, beaten, and force fed in prison for demonstating for the right to vote. What a shame that so many of us take that for granted, and so many women don’t even vote at all. Palin thinks women now have it made, as far as opportunity to advance in a career of their choosing is concerned, but there is still work to be done and inequality to be overcome. Hillary Clinton recognizes this, but Palin evidently does not.
Posted by: Ruth Brown | October 24, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Avoidable Crisis
Announcer: Listen to Joe Biden. Talking about what electing Barack Obama will mean.
JOE BIDEN: “Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama. The world is looking. We’re going to have an international crisis … to test the mettle of this guy. I guarantee you it’s gonna happen.”
Announcer: It doesn’t have to happen. Vote McCain.
Ads that use the words of opponents against them always work more effectively, and this could be the Best of Class, perhaps even better than Joe the Plumber. While most Americans reject redistributionism, it has nuances that allow Barack Obama to explain it away in rebuttal. Biden’s statement has no shadings at all. Elect Barack Obama and we’ll face an international crisis right away specifically to test Obama — because he’s untested and inexperienced.
Every voter understands what that means. Who wants unnecessary crisis? As the ad states, they can avoid that by electing John McCain instead. Heck, Biden’s own words makes that plain.
Posted by: Thank you to Joe Biden for the warning | October 24, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
SEVERES BLUE:
You said: “A feminist is simply someone who believes that women should have the same opportunities as men and be treated as equals.”
If that is all you believe feminism to be, you’re a bigger twit than Palin. Perhaps you should follow her lead like most uninformed people will.
Posted by: Male Feminist | October 24, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
all i see is everyone being fickle about something the other side says or does. We need to get past saying the other side is worse than the other. Peolple are being soo petty on both side. its like listening to my kids explain why they were fighting with each other.
Posted by: will it end | October 24, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Not like it matters. To feminists, Palin is the ultimate anti-feminist. She will not be bringing in substantial amounts of Hillary voters…
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | October 24, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Even people in New Zealand are talking about Obama’s Socialism. Where is our media at?
http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2008/10/obama-file-41-obama-was-new-party.html
Posted by: Michael | October 24, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Both she and her maybe boss McCain say they are whatever people want them to be at the moment. She’s a feminist, he’s a savior, blah,blah,blah…
Posted by: Terri | October 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
carolstrick – only women can be feminists – not men. You could ask the other candidates if they are in favor of equal rights for women and you’d get your answer pretty clearly as McCain has repeatedly voted against any equal pay or equal rights initiative put before him in the senate. He has also said some pretty derogatory comments about women publically. One can call McCain a lot of things but an advocate for equality he is not.
Posted by: voted early for Obama in Florida | October 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Community organizer? Racist!
Mentioning his middle name? Racist!
Arrogant? Racist!
Elitist? Racist!
Palling around with a (white!) terrorist? Racist!
Celebrity? Racist!
Cosmopolitan? Racist!
Using advisor who is an African-American former Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae? Racist!
Socialist? Racist!
Posted by: Obama's Handy Pocket Guide to Playing the Race Card | October 24, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Feminist is a new word? Palin stupid? You are retarded in America.
Posted by: gina | October 24, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Poster @ 8:30:22 AM…First, what Joe Biden said was taken out of context. Secondly, Joe Lieberman said the same exact thing if McCain won. Using the argument that McCain would be more prepared for it. McCain and his ilk are nothing but dishonorable hypocrites.
Posted by: Liz | October 24, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
I never reached the deranged state of mind where I was going to vote for obama. Then today I saw something that would have changed my mind had I reached that point. After all the BS over Gov. Palin’s clothes, I saw obama boarding his campaign plane to fly to Hawaii to visit his sick grandmother. I’m wondering, who’s paying for that? The DNC or obama’s campaign? Of course it’s “the messiah” so you’ve got to know the press will never bring this up!
McCain/Palin 08
Posted by: John W | October 24, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Anyway she is favoring half of the society.
Posted by: twift1 | October 24, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
To: Voted early for Obama in Florida
What I find equally preposterous are pro-war anti-abortionist Christians. Quite a conundrum in my opinion.
Posted by: Confused | October 24, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
What amazes me is the vile, nonsensical comments posted by many regarding this issue. To have the feelings you do about Governor Palin is one thing, but to actually write them down for others to see is beyond me.
Where is the outrage with regards to Senator Obama’s left-leaning agenda? The MSM is definitely in the tank for Obama/Biden, and are proud of the fact they have left journalism far behind in favor of seeking to control the election.
It must be difficult campaigning against Obama/Biden and an ever-increasingly hostile media.
Posted by: Ron | October 24, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Voting this year in this election is just like driving: If you want to go backward, and back into trouble, use “R”
If you want to go forward, choose “D”.
Posted by: allen_osuno | October 24, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
This woman is definitely no “role model” for women, she is embarrassing and appalling!! Dishonest, unethical, an ambitious political opportunist who will say/do anything to pander to her constituency, and not too bright. There have to be millions of other women in this country who would make a better VP or POTUS, but NOT THIS ONE!!
Posted by: Optimistic | October 24, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Sarah Palin, you are a total moron and a disgrace to all women.
Posted by: Lily Bell | October 24, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
McCain-Unstable/Palin-Unable. Vote Sarah Palin because John McCain counts on you to be an idiot. This woman is a complete empty-headed bimbo and unfit for any high office. Period.
Posted by: allen_osuno | October 24, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
So Sarah Palin is against labeling people, including herself. Really? That certainly does not stop her from labeling her opponent as a socialist, pal of terrorists, leftist, and so forth. Would hypocrite be the right word?
Posted by: Peter Owens | October 24, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
if one side is going to question campaign funds for personal use, then its fair to question the other if they are doing the same. It’s not ok to use these funds for clothing, but ok if they use them to visit a sick grandmother?? c’mon get real.
Posted by: will it end | October 24, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
It is interesting to see what is apparently the real Brian Williams: a sexist. I saw his interview with McCain and Palin, and Williams was badgering Palin to accept a label which she fought off. This was a trap: If she said she was a feminist (which she has said in the past, and Williams mentioned he knew this), she’s criticized. If she says she is not a feminist, she’s criticized. Why did Brian Williams ask her the question if he already knew her past answer? Clearly, he was playing gotcha journalism.
Brian Williams he tries to make news by jumping on the anti-Palin bandwagon. Williams shows his open hostility in his introduction to these segments, which consist of a list of irrelevant slams whereas he could have listed policy positions. Palin and McCain showed class by responding to his attacks with dignity.
Brian Williams shows he lacks professional integrity.
Posted by: tina | October 24, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
It is not about “Joe the Plumber” (actually Sam the unlicensed apprentice who qualifies for Obama tax CUT)…It is not about Joe the Plumber, it is about John the Scammer.
Posted by: steve_detroit | October 24, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
To Michael:
Take them to Europe, Michael! Take them anywhere else, just not here! We have no use for uneducated anti-women rights proponents like Palin and desperate war-loving polititions like McCain.
Did you notice – Palin thinks that women already have equal rights! She does not seem to care about equal pay… And we know McCain does not either!
Posted by: To Michael | October 24, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I wonder if Obama will stay in Hawaii after the Federal Court in PA rules, possibly today; that he has not proven he is a natural born American citizen as required by the United States Constitution to become POTUS?
For info on the case see http://www.Americas right.com
Posted by: Archarito | October 24, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The reason Palin refuses to “label” herself now, is that she is afraid of offending her conservative base. She’s bucking for a presidential run in 2012 and she has to keep the neo-cons happy. She has already thrown her running mate under the bus several times. The lady is mindlessly ambitious!
Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 24, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Tina, Brian Williams doesn’t lack integrity for asking the questions that the press asks every candidate, it is YOU who lack integrity for trying to cover up for this lying, opportunistic, ignorant woman who is unfit to be Vice President. Look in the mirror when you want to point out lack of integrity. Anyone who can vote McCain/Palin after the unprincipaled liars they have shown themselves to be, himself as a voter lacks any kind of honesty or integrity because apparently McCain’s lying means more to this kind of voter than America’s future means to them. Shame on McCain voters for seconding McCain’s lying, slanderous campaign.
Posted by: booty_smack_17 | October 24, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
It’s almost over…Obama 08.
Posted by: ann | October 24, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Hockey Mom?-Go puck yourself! You knew that was coming…
Posted by: Redneck4Obama | October 24, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Archarito, Obama has more than proven he is a natural born American citizen. McCain was born in the Canal Zone. I question his right to run for president too. But Obama has a verified birth certificate showing he was born in Hawaii after it was a state and part of the US citizenry. I don’t know why you cons keep posting these lies about false issues that have been thoroughly disproven. I guess it’s because cons mainly deal in lies and just keep repeating them over and over, no matter what the truth is. This is textbook practice right out of the totalitarian playbook. Repeat a lie often enough in hopes people will believe it.
Posted by: repubs_be_evil_liars | October 24, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
tina – Why is Brian Williams a sexist for asking the exact same question that Katie Couric, a woman, asked?
This is not “gotcha” journalism. The two reporters are on two different networks. How is it “gotcha” to ask the same question to the same person?
Are you a Republican or Democrat? Would you change your answer if you were asked a hundred times? Who cares how many times they ask Palin questions, shouldn’t the answers be consistant?
The only “gotcha” here is that the woman can never answer the same question the same way. She has flip flopped on so many issues, she doesn’t know if she is coming or going. McCain tried to getcha by throwing a female on his ticket. Unfortunately the female is ill prepared for this position and it clearly shows.
A liar, and panderer? “You Betcha!”
Posted by: mybrainreallyhurts | October 24, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
I love it. It’s the ’60s Hawks vs Doves all over again. I feel like I’m back in my old groove.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
I have a label for her!
Idiot!!
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I don’t know about her being a feminist, but she sure is the dumbest!
Posted by: Bobbi | October 24, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
“Every voter understands what that means. Who wants unnecessary crisis? As the ad states, they can avoid that by electing John McCain instead. Heck, Biden’s own words makes that plain.” – posted by Thank you Joe Biden for the warning at 8:30:22 AM==============
You should be far more fearful of the candidate that seems to believe that his Mavericky image and the fact that he sat in a jet 40 years ago will protect him from being tested. History shows that presidents get tested no matter what their history. Recent history also shows us what happens when the president refuses to take warnings seriously…remember?
I, for one, would much rather put my trust in someone who is aware of the potential threats and will be prepared to deal with or possibly prevent them.
Posted by: Dan W | October 24, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Will the REAL Barack Obama please stand up?
When Barack Obama stood on that futbol field
in Germany, did you think he was kidding
when he said he wanted to take Your money
and give it to the poor countries of Africa?
If you think he wanted to take a
few coins from the public purse and toss
them around Spanish Harlem, you”re thinking
of a traditional charity driven liberal
Democrat like Hillary Clinton.
The REAL Barack Obama Is That Guy you saw in
That Church, an honest to God, Chicago meat
plant, Detroit assembly line, swing for the
Left Field fences Socialist. He Meant he
wanted to take boat loads of Your money, and
give it to Africa. Obama MEANS to tax doctors
and nurses and give it to the poooor for
health care. HE MEANS he is going to tax
college professors and PAs to give it to Harlem
and South Central for college. Barack Obama
MEANS to give away the excess pay of junior
corporate managers to the poor shnooks who fell
for those balloon payments. Barack Obama IS
going to tax George Clooney”s excess profits
and give it to Spike Lee and Snoop Dogg to
make African American Girls Gone Wild Holocaust
docudramas. He fully intends to give Cheech
and Chong bushels of taxes to build a ganja
powered jet fighter. Ok so it will only shoot
rose petals, but the exhaust will get the enemy
so high they won”t want to fight us. This, IS
the REAL BARACK OBAMA, and he is the most extreme
leftist to hit Leningrad on the Potomac.
Posted by: Jerry | October 24, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
The GOP wants their women dumb ans subservient.
Posted by: Go GOP(really) | October 24, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
“Every voter understands what that means. Who wants unnecessary crisis? As the ad states, they can avoid that by electing John McCain instead. Heck, Biden’s own words makes that plain.” – posted by Thank you Joe Biden for the warning
Why do Republicans believe EVERYTHING they see on TV or get in an email?
Think for yourself and do the research.
Oh and by the way, the draft dodging Bush was really prepared to handle something like 9/11, right?
You and I could have handled the situation better because we would have acted on the intelligence that was received BEFORE the planes hit our precious Americans. —topic for another day I guess—
Posted by: mybrainreallyhurts | October 24, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
JOE BIDEN: “Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama. The world is looking. We’re going to have an international crisis … to test the mettle of this guy. I guarantee you it’s gonna happen.”
If SNL was really a comedy show and not an unfunny liberal proganda machine it would of mocked Biden last night instead of a pathetic dreadful skit about Bush, McCain and the Palins.
Posted by: Nat Turner | October 24, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Martin, @ 8:15
I never read anyone claim that Obama is a terrorist, only that he has close ties to a couple. Which Obama admits.
No one claimed that Obama is a criminal only that he paid $300,000 below asking price for his house after a known criminal “negotiated” for him.
His plan to redistribute the wealth is Marxist theory.
Religion is irrelevant.
Sitting in a church for 20 years listening to “God Damn America” is anti-American no matter how you slice it.
No one accused Obama of election fraud. ACORN evidently did commit election fraud, after Obama paid them $800,000.
I don’t believe everything I read or hear but you have to admit, at some point plausible denyability becomes less plausible.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Jerry – shhhhh
This article is on Palin. Do you have anything to add to defend your candidates running mate, or are you just going to attack because you cant discuss the issues just like she does?
Posted by: mybrainreallyhurts | October 24, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
As usual, chameleon Palin doing her usual thing. Now when are we going to see her sit with the big boys & girls on Meet the Press? Oh yeah, never, because she’s nothing but a marketing ploy!
Posted by: cyclingmama | October 24, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
The only reason people think she is stupid is because that is what the media portray her as. She could be Mother Teresa and the lovely media would slam her to the ground and you all would lap it up. She was a very popular GOVENOR before this election-with both parties.
Posted by: deb | October 24, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Hey she just might be getting smarter. Don’t forget she hasn’t had two years of media hounding to polish her message. She is just getting up to speed on what is politically smart .
Posted by: rafraf | October 24, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
If by feminist we are talking about someone who likes to bitch and moan about why they can’t get ahead in life rather than actually going out and earning their keep well, I guess she’s not a feminist. Palin actually saw problems in government, be it on the local, state, or national level, and decided to act. If women are discriminated against and prevented from advancing, well, I guess she didn’t get that memo.
Posted by: MAH1172 | October 24, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
“The only reason people think she is stupid is because that is what the media portray her as. She could be Mother Teresa and the lovely media would slam her to the ground and you all would lap it up. She was a very popular GOVENOR before this election-with both parties.”
Are you serious?
The only reason why people think she is stupid is because she opens her mouth. The media just shows us what she says, or omits…
Go look up her approval rating in Alaska now. It is dropping faster than the stock market.
Posted by: mybrainreallyhurts | October 24, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I’d like to comment that there is no ONE definition of feminism. And honestly, what politician wouldn’t say that he/she believes in equal rights for women? It’s the actions they take and the belief that drive their work that is important. Look on Obama’s website vs. McCain’s. Obama has an entire page devoted to laying out concrete steps he will take to advance women and close the pay gap – McCain doesn’t mention it once. I’d like someone to ask John McCain if he identifies as a feminist and watch him stumble and avoid his way through an answer.
Posted by: Feminist aren't... | October 24, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I do not agree with Palin on her pro-life stance, however, I respect her choice. I do think she is a role model to many women (not all). There are very few women in this country that managed to have 5 kids and a successful career. For that she gets my respect.
I will vote for McCaina/Palin, because I refuse to give my vote to a man who lacks experience, judgment, integrity, character and who could not put a white woman on a ticket just because she is smarter than him.
Posted by: Alexandra | October 24, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
cyclingmama…did you just bring up meet the press? please, if tim russert was alive today he’d be ashamed by the actions on NBC during this election cycle.
Posted by: mah1172 | October 24, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Palin is NOT a feminist!
She made rape victims pay for police rape kits in Alaska.
Since most victims of rape are women, that is very sexist – against your own gender!!
No other crime in Alaska asks for the victim to pay for police forensics in any other case – why should rape victims – most of whom are women?
That is enough for me to be against Palin. Period.
Palin is not being hounded because she is a woman – she is being hounded for her hypocrisy, lack of scientific understanding and very weird ideas – such as the earth being only 6,000 years old
(there are ancient civilizations that are older than that! Iran’s history goes back at least 8,000 years).
Why on earth didn’t McCain choose someone like Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison? He certainly would have been taken more seriously if he had someone of that stature on the ticket. Too bad McCain thought with his hormones instead of his brain.
Even Condi Rice can’t bring herself to endorse Palin – what does that tell you?
Posted by: going2hope4better | October 24, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
You libs need to get a life.
Posted by: billy bob | October 24, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I love the recent McCane commercial with John stating, “I just can’t wait to introduce HER [Palin] to the “good ol’ boys” in the Capital.” Like she is some kinda prized trophy. Quite the feminist statement, I might add (with tongue in cheek). Personally I’m fed up with the “good ol’ boys” network.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Will the REAL John McCain please stand up?
The McCain that accepted $214,000 from Charles Keating
The McCain that took many junkets, aboard Keating’s jet to Keating’s estate in Jamaica
The McCain who was cited for “poor judgment” in the Keting Five scandal
The McCain who is a close friend of convicted felon and domestic terrorist G. Gordon Liddy
The McCain who was a member of the US Council for World Freedom, tied to Iran-Contra and Latin American death squads
The McCain who picked Wm Timmons, lobbyist for Saddam Hussein, to be his transition coordinator should he win
The McCain whose campaign manager was a lobbyist for Freddie/Fannie
The McCain who gets his advice on the economy from Phill Gramm
The McCain who voted 17 times for deregulation of Wall St.
The McCain, veteran, who was against the new GI Bill
The McCain who wants to bomb Iran
The McCain who would not rule out war with Russia
The McCain, veteran, who voted against every veterans health care issue in the last four years
The McCain whose spiritual advisor, the Rev. Parsley, wants all out war with the entire Muslim world
The McCain who wants to tax health benefits
The McCain who wants more tax cuts for big oil and fat cat corporations
The McCain who voted with Bush 90% of the time
The real John McCain is a dangerous, hot-headed right-wing Fascist. We fought Fascism in WWII. He is the most extreme right winger to hit Moscow on the Potomac
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 24, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I could out a label on her but they would not print it……
Posted by: NH voter | October 24, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I agree with “Feminist aren’t…” that there is no one definition of feminism. In fact to define feminism is to defy feminism (bell hooks anyone?)
In that sense, I can see Palin’s dilemma, but I’m not sure how much Palin understands feminism.
Posted by: 2Cheers4Democracy | October 24, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
going2hope4better…you point out several times that MOST rape victims are women. I guess by “most” you could also say “not all.” Men and children can also be rape victims and they too would have to pay for the kit. It may have been an insensative policy, but it’s in no way an indication that Palin is anti-women. Maybe it was just a way to trim every penny off the local budget as possible. Again, insensative, even cold…sure. But not anti-women.
Posted by: mah1172 | October 24, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
“No press conferences”???? Where is Biden??? Where is his grilling about TV IN 1929? His statements that BO isn’t ready to lead (primaries) and his statements about the USA BEING A TARGET IF BO IS ELECTED??? How about when he said you have to speak an Indian accent at 7-11′s??? The MEDIA IS DEAD!!! JOURNALISM IS DEAD!!! Where are the reports about foreign campaign contributions to ALL OF THE DEMS RUNNING FOR OFFICE!! Where is the investigations about BO spending $150 million on “education” in Chicago with Bill Ayers and did NOT IMPROVE TEST SCORES OR COMPREHENSION OF CORE CURRICULUM??? Where is Rezki, Wright, Ayers, reports on BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY AND ODINGA IN KENYA (who BO campaigned for) EVEN THOUGH ODINGA IS A RADICAL ISLAMIST AND KILLED HUNDREDS OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN A CHURCH TO SCARE THE GOVT INTO MAKING HIM PRIME MINISTER??? WHERE IS MY BELOVED ABC WITH ALL OF THIS??? Journalism is dead!!! JOURNALISM IS DEAD!!!
Posted by: Tommy | October 24, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Yomama has bought this election. Watching him use his dying grandmother as a sympathy campaign ploy today on GMA was nauseating. “I just hope she makes it to election day”. You know what…keep that to yourself pal. I’, ok with visiting her but to go on the news and discuss it….man..what a slime ball.
Also…great article today on “What if SNL mocked Michelle Obama?” C’mon folks….answer that question? We’d have rioting in the streets?
Or how about the news media’s urgent inquest into Cindy McCain’s prescpription drug usage….looking into that just this week by the news media? How about ONE STORY ON OBAMA’S ILLEGAL USE OF COCAINE AS A YOUTH?
Nope..didn’t think so. The ONE must be protected.
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
” I’m not going to put a label on myself.”
Ohhh but you like to label Barack everything but an American, how nice.
Posted by: kdodi | October 24, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
The SHORTS IN THE Stock MARKET ARE PRICING IN OBAMA”S VICTORY.
REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH = SOCIALISM = 1,000 LEVEL ON A DOW
FAR LEFT DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT + DEMOCRATIC HOUSE + DEMOCRATIC SENATE = NO CHECK AND BALANCES
Posted by: LostDemocray | October 24, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
mybrainreallyhurts
“Oh and by the way, the draft dodging Bush was really prepared to handle something like 9/11, right?”
George W served in the National Guard. Dan Quayle served in the National Guard. Bill Clinton burned his draft card and refused to serve. Al Gore never served, Sen. Obama and Sen. Biden never saw fit to serve. John McCain served for over 20 years. If I were to 4 pick draft dodgers from that group ……
Your brain must hurt.
No one could have been prepared for 9/11. It should have been predicted however. Intelligence was received even before Bush took office. Clinton chose to ignore it. Every time our defenses are allowed to weaken we invite attack. Happened in 1941 and again in 2001. Clinton balanced the budget by cutting spending on defense. Same thing happened in the 30′s and with much the same result. Obama will cut defense spending again inviting yet another attack. McCain will strengthen our defenses to prevent attack.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
How can you expect her to answer that question when they gave her such a big word to comprehend? Feminist. That’s more than 4 letters = beyond her comprehension, she’ll get back to you on that, quick get a dictionary for her Brian…
Posted by: Julie | October 24, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Didnt Palin call Hillary a whiner during the primaries? And as far as Labeling Things she has labeled America, As some parts ar Pro and some arent. I guess the parts of the US that are Pro America are the ones that support her and Mccain thats Labeling to me.
Posted by: Angie | October 24, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
No feminest would spend $150,000 on clothes for herself with the people’s money as their first act as a national political figure. The Right wing media would have temper tantrums for months and months if she were a Democrat. This was poor, poor, poor judgement!!
Posted by: JimM | October 24, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
What if Sarah Palin said that FDR went on television in 1929 to discuss how the crash of the markets happened?
What if she said that? The media would call her idiotic, dumb, dangerously unprepared, naive, unfit!!!
Well…your 36 year Senator veteran, Joe Biden actually said it. Guess What…it’s ok!! It’s Just Joe being Joe.
Not only was FDR not President in 1929 but the last time I checked….Television wasn’t invented.
Media Double Standard? Ya think so???
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Hey Lil:
Your reference to Obama’s ties to the scoialist party are published by the same right wing organization whose recent headline is: “What if ‘Saturday Night Live’ mocked Michelle Obama?” I fail to see their relationship. I didn’t realize Michelle was running for office.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
palin a feminist? that’s laughable.
Posted by: ejohn38 | October 24, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Palin says “And I think that’s what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different . . . I’m not going to put a label on myself.”
========================================
She doesn’t label put on herself but has no trouble putting labels on others. Let me put a label on her: ASarah, You’re a Fraud!
Posted by: indy_voter | October 24, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Caribou Barbie should be investigated for child abuse. No infant should be used as a prop at politcal rallies, especially late at night. Feminist? She should look up what it means to be a responsible mother.
—————————————-
I agree with this. It concerns me to see Trig carried around like a sack of potatoes–I even dreamed about the little guy. In her “special needs” speech, I want to know about her philosophy of child development and how a noisy, volatile infancy can possibly be a good thing.
Posted by: Colorado Dem | October 24, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Obama and his thugs have lots of labels…fraud, impostor, dangerous thinker, liar…..we dare not speak these labels because the Messiah can not be spoke out against. How dare us?
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Hey Oonogil:
You sed, “McCain will strengthen our defenses to prevent attack.”
Dude. Lighten up. You’re way too full of fear, like most non-critical thinkers are.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
The problem I have with the feminist label is the problem I have with most feminists themselves. It has too narrow of a definition. I would think it should be about empowerment for all women, whether it means you want a career, want to be a mother/wife or a combination of both. I think Gov. Palin is very narrow minded in what she thinks are appropriate roles for women, (unless it’s her) so I don’t believe she fits my definition of a feminist. But, that being said – most of the other feminists don’t either.
Posted by: e-wench | October 24, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Very odd Sarah. You won’t label yourself, but you sure will label other people.. “true Americans”, he’s a “socialist”, etc. etc. etc. You sure are good at slinging the Bullsh&t when it suits you.
Posted by: lkinopfl | October 24, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
@Jerry:
Don’t you have an education, an own mind and an own motivation? Sorry, but your comment scared me off, how can someone be so naive and think Obama can do more than all our politicians, your comment reminded me of a sect. We are well educated in Germany, and since Hitler is over, we don’t fall anymore for prophetic politicians.
Posted by: gina | October 24, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Some people on here make it sound like being called a feminist is a good thing. Personally, I’d find it insulting to be called a feminist. Wow, what are all those feminists going to do when a conservative woman makes it to the white house? won’t that prove that the feminist movement was nothing but a bunch of angry scorned women acting out because their husbands turned them in for a newer model?
Posted by: mah1172 | October 24, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Colarado Dem…why can’t we allow a female candidate with a baby to be on a national ticket? Lttle Trig is extremely well taken care of. Would Obama be allowed to run for President if he had an infant and he wanted to take that baby along? Of course he would.
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Is Sarah Palin a feminist? Of course not, she already told everyone she was a redneck. WeeeHawww, Alaska will get their Hillbilly Governor back right after the election.
Posted by: PhilBgood | October 24, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Being a feminist is a vey positive thing, too long time men have oppressed women without any reason.Just because they were too lazy to wash their own stuff and cook for themselves. Who do they think they are these men? We are all equal. Full stop.
Posted by: gina | October 24, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Hey mah1172:
You make me laugh! Thanks. I needed a good laugh this morning. What a bimbo.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Hopefully Alaska will get back his governor, she can also come to Germany, she does not deserve such a bunch of misogynists running behind their prophetic Obama.
Posted by: gina | October 24, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
And Michelle Obama is just a housewive smiling in the camera with her two kids, if she has had any guts, she would have thrown out Obama and run for president herself.
Posted by: gina | October 24, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
In Regards to people posting about Palins Children, I do belive a Couple months Back over the Summer Republicans bashing the Obamas for showing their Daughters and bringing them on the Trail, But Its ok for Palin to drag her children? not understanding. And why does she never hold that baby? The little girl is always holding him and can Barley hold him.
Posted by: Angie | October 24, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Hey Angie:
Come back when you learn how to type. Ok?
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Spending $150,000 on clothes and accessories wasn’t the smartest thing for the republican campaign to do because it gives fodder for the democrats, but what about the $5million “unknown” expenses the Obama campaign lists on its expenses or the $400,000+ on food. Come on, how petty. I’m guessing her wardrobe update was Cindy’s idea, who spends more than that on one dress. I have to admit, I’m not sending any more money to the republicans for her wardrobe. People in charge just don’t seem to “get it” when it comes to spending the American’s money.
Posted by: Susan Grambley | October 24, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Hey John…Noticed you told one of the other posters that he’s to full of fear and not not worry about a strong national defense. don’t know about you, but i was in midtown manhattan on 9/11 and was able to watch the entire thing unfold from our office window. that day did fill me with fear. could’ve been my building. could have been my dad’s building who was over on the east side. i guess you forgot about 9/11. i never will.
Posted by: mah1172 | October 24, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
“I will not label myself, but that evil terrorist Barack Obama is a socialist!”
Posted by: Dave in VA - REAL VA! | October 24, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Some of you need to wake up, smell the roses and think for yourselves rather than using campain talking points and spewing hate. We need to discuss our differences on the issues!
Also, please note that we certainly will be tested no matter who is elected. Experience is not always the answer; judgment, thoughtfulness and the wisdom to truly reflect on recommendations of very smart people will help Obama make informed decisions versus the shoot from the hip style of Mr. Irratic McCan’t.
Someone obviously is gravely uninformed, Michelle is not a stay at home mom; she has taken a leave of absence from a very prominent position that pays well.
Sarah “the labeler” has no problem handing out labels on others but for some reason cannot admit to who or what she stands for; give me a break she is not being picked on because of being female, rather simply because her knowledge on the issues is only “Powerpoint Deep”. She cannot discuss them beyond the rote talking points given to her.
Posted by: Bill, Dayton, OH | October 24, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Hey Jim how about we argue about something worth while? Joe Biden makes a mistake weeks ago while speaking? That’s the best you’ve got? Have you read any news the last two weeks about McCain’s speech errors or Palins? How about any news about ethics violations, new depositions being taken, countless noteworthy Republicans jumpins ship and supporting Barack… Yeah, get current why don’t you.
Posted by: Julie | October 24, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I am amazed! Is party loyalty so deep with many of you that you are willing to sacrifice the well-being of our country? WE ARE IN TROUBLE HERE!!!Anyone with the intelligence of even a mustard seed can easily determine that Ms. Palin is woefully unqualified to be Vice President with a REAL possibility of becoming President of the United States! Maybe one day… but not right now! Mr. Obama may not be the perfect choice but at least he and his campaign have presented plans, proposals, and offered ideas for discussion versus a Republican campaign that have used nothing more then scare tactics, tits & a**, and just smears. I have heard more about Ayers, socialism, inexperience than what exactly are McCain & Palin going to do! Yes! I could go to the McCain website and read “their” whatever but why do that when I have only minimally heard the candidates utter thier “own” proposals themselves? Do THEY believe what they say? Are they even interested? Or, is it just about winning? Ms. Palin is a feminist and then she is not…. just too much of this erractic blah-blah-blah! Thus, I can only conclude that this is the way they would govern and this is something that we could do without at this time.
Posted by: FS | October 24, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Most accurate poll that was release today…shows Obama leading by only 1 Point…with 11% undecided. McCain has been gaining with women, independents this entire week. This was the poll that was closest to the 2004 and 2000 actual results.
Hey Barry….may want to stop building that elaborate set in Chicago for your victory party. Most Americans don’t like to be told who the winner is before we actually vote.
Shock the World!
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
FS…why is Obama more qualified than Palin to be pres?
Posted by: mah1172 | October 24, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
She has a “quarky” way of explaining things.
Posted by: Jim Bob | October 24, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Obama is the Thomas Dewey of 2008
Posted by: Jim | October 24, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
how funny that she will not label herself, but she is quick to label parts of America and definitely the Democrats…..
I can understand she may have needed clothing for the tour; however she could have went to outlet centers and found really nice designer clothes for less than 150K!
Shame on her for being a fraud
Posted by: earl | October 24, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
On the comment about Palin being like Cheney: “I’m as concerned about Palin being four more years of Cheney. ”
I think Cheney is the devil himself, yet I fear Palin more because at least I trust Cheney not to make a complete hash of whatever nefarious plan he is working on, whereas Palin would probably end up nuking half the US by mistake.
Posted by: Limorkil | October 24, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
She has a “quarky” way of explaining tings. As for the $150,000. It was only $50,000 in clothes, but I know my wife feels bad when she spends over $30 for an outfit.
Posted by: Jim Bob | October 24, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin calls herself a fiscal conservative who wants to “rein in government spending.” She says she “reformed the abuses of earmarks in our state.” Republican John McCain said during the last debate that his running mate has “cut the size of government.”
But Palin didn’t cut the size of government as mayor of Wasilla, and she hasn’t done so as Alaska’s governor, city and state budget records show. Spending in fast-growing Wasilla increased by 55% during her tenure from 1996-2002, records show. In nearly two years as governor, she has presided over a 31% spending hike by a state government that sought earmarks from Washington even as it reaped billions from higher oil prices and Palin-backed tax increases on oil companies
Posted by: geneonlbk | October 24, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Please, let’s elect someone with a BRAIN this time…no more puppets.
Posted by: disgusted | October 24, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
I am fine with people being pro-life or pro-choice–but please stop using the rape and incest examples as the brunt of your argument. Most people who are pro-life are ok with those minor exceptions. But when those who are pro-choice use this example to show that pro-lifers are callous–people should know that rape and incest represent less than 1% of all abortions in this country. Less than 1%–so don’t distract from what most people use it as–which is birth control. It is fine to argue your point–just present better back-up than less than 1%.
Posted by: TC | October 24, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
John
Dude, do “critical thinkers” think the way to peace is to invite attack?
Dude, do “critical thinkers” believe that weakening our military will have different affect in 2009 than it has in the past?
Dude, wake up dude. Leave the pot alone and look around. Reality can be seen even through you southern California haze. ….. Dude.
Thanks for the laugh.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Hey mah1172:
I haven’t forgotten 9/11, however I would rather die living with hope, than living in fear like you Republicans do.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Is Palin getting fair treatment? Well that depends. Any political candidate should expect intense scrutiny and nobody is perfect and beyond question. However, in order to be fair, we really need to be equally skeptical of the other candidates.
Joe Biden? He probably means well, but every other day he seems to say something foolish. Definitely not presidential.
Obama is a great speaker and is good at saying all the things we want to hear. But it amazes me that someone with his lack of national experience would even be considered as a VP let alone Presidential candidate. After a few more terms in the senate and after producing a strong record of leadership in the senate, then who knows, he might be a great choice for President.
I’m not Democrat or Republican and not a big fan of John Mcain. Just trying to be objective. Hopefully more people can do the same. Are these really the best people we can chose from? If so, that’s very sad and disturbing
Posted by: don'tbelievethehype | October 24, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Hey Oonogil:
Live in fear, die in fear. Bubye.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
She wont label herself except when she says she is a: maverick, reformer, hockey mom, feminist (she did label herself this in other interviews), conservative…but hey those are not labels those are umm monikers, yes that’s it monikers… I cannot figure out who the bigger liar is Sarah or John. Watch them each out on the stump repeating accusations that have been proven false through factcheck.org yet that does not deter them from repeating this bile time and time again. That is why the desperatly trail in the polls and that is why they will lose!!!!
Posted by: Dan | October 24, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Must be NICE,to drop 150,000.00 on clothing,I could pay of everything I owe!HEY ! SARAH,go to WALMART like the rest of us,and save yourself some money!
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Also, Palin didn’t spend $150,000 of the people’s money on anything. That was the money the RNC used from their pool of money to provide her with a wardrobe to campaign and do these interviews since she is in teh public spotlight. they do not discuss how much I’m sure hte men paid — both parties — for their wardrobes. In facty I don’t remember it ever being discussed so the fact it has been brought up now is just anotehr lame tactic. I truly am undecided and unaffiliated but it is painfull obvious to me how much more Palin is raked over the coals for EVERYTHING then either dmeocrat is.
Posted by: TC | October 24, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
wow..sorry for my typos. That is what happens when I try to type fast.
Posted by: TC | October 24, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
I’m still waiting for Gov Palin to return the money to the U S Treasury that the State of Alaska kept when Sarah said thanks but no thanks to the bridge to nowhere. I wonder what the Palins did with that money?
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | October 24, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Palin isn’t a feminist – she’s a stupid c–nt.
Posted by: fed up | October 24, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
mah1172 asked: FS …why is Obama more qualified than Palin to be pres?
First, of all…he is literate!! He and others of his team have demonstrated a thirst to learn and evaluate then execute. Much like the Kennedy administration (which success I know can be debated) However, I do think the democrats are aware of that and are looking for that “right” balance. I’m sure Mr. McCain is literate too (you would not know it by how he has run his campaign…) but quite honestly, I question Ms. Palin’s thirst for knowledge and reasoning. She comes across (to me) as “just learn enough to do” and the rest depends upon your gut. I believe we have had eight years of that already. But, I do give Mr Bush much more credit than Ms. Palin. To me, Ms Palin is much more akin to Mr. Cheney with ONE big difference… he is smart and educated… she is not.
Posted by: FS | October 24, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
She’s so mavericky… LOL
Posted by: constant noise | October 24, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
In order to pay for the $150,000 wardrobe the RNC had to trim $150,000 from their already stretched budget. Guess which Republican Congresswoman the RNC threw under the bus? Michele Bachmann of Minnesota. Yep, that’s right. The RNC cut $150,000 out of Bachmann’s ad’s that the RNC was running for her. Michele is going to pay the price for Sarah’s wardrobe. ROTFLMAO
Posted by: PhilBggod | October 24, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I tell ya folks,POLITICS IS WERE IT,S AT!!!! 150,000.00 FOR CLOTHS? MAN, I could probably live on what she pays her d#mn HAIR DRESSER ! Most of us pay 22 bucks for a pair of carhearts, and have to ware them for two or three years! Wonder when she,s going to have her yard sale?
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Jesus H. Christ – when the hell is this sad, sorry, stupid woman going to go away already? Nobody cares anymore. Her 15 minutes were up 15 minutes ago…
Posted by: tronixx | October 24, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Sarah’s a feminist? I thought she said she was a redneck. We need to send that redneck hillbilly back to the hills of Alaska.
Posted by: Audrey M. | October 24, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Obama is the Thomas Dewey of 2008
Posted by: Jim |Oct 24, 2008 10:01:39 AM
***************************************
Perhaps you’re confused:
Dewey was a Republican,
Obama is a Democrat.
Dewey lost,
Obama will win.
Posted by: Julie | October 24, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
I definetly think she is a feminist. She stands up for every woman. Just because she doesn’t have the views with extreme feminist doesn’t mean she is not a role model. My 16 year old daughter ask why the media is so mean to her is it because she is a woman. The media doesn’t care though Barbara W. Fought for what she got but can down this amazing woman for being conservative. It doesn’t matter liberal or conservative she is a great role model.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Palin isn’t a feminist. She’s a divisive, hateful idiot who goes around insulting honest, hardworking Americans and questioning our patriotism. I live in Northern Virginia and I cannot wait to cast my vote for Obama and sent this rotten loudmouth back to Alaska where she belongs. Who the hell is SHE to decide who is “pro-America”?
Posted by: camlock | October 24, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Hypocrite:
1. a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess.
2. a pretense of having some desirable or publicly approved attitude.
3. an act or instance of hypocrisy
Posted by: Robert Romero | October 24, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
You uninformed abc bloggers must bible this agency. She did not spend 150K. Read more than this. And read about the lawsuite filed against Obama by a Democrate and why. You wont find it here.
Posted by: Jim Rod | October 24, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
To mah1172 – point taken.
At least we agree that making rape victims pay for the rape kit is cold-hearted by anyone’s standards.
BTW – it has been confirmed by the official authorities in Hawaii that Obama IS a natural born US citizen. It does not matter how old his mother was, it matters where Obama was born.
At the time of his birth, Hawaii was part of the US, so he is eligible to be president.
One interesting point – John McCain was born in Panama – there were issues about his eligibility and there was a court case pending in the Federal District Court in Concord NH as of July this year. The Senate in April ruled that McCain can run as president despite not having the court ruling.
Interesting that no one has mentioned that.
Just check out Snopes.com
(so many rumours!)
Posted by: going2hope4better | October 24, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Oonogil…
First, having contact with someone who committed radical acts during the 60’s in protest of the Vietnam War doesn’t constitute “Close ties” but if you want to make associations then McCain who worked with racists Senators like (Jesse Helms, Robert Byrd) a racist? Do you consider Senator McCain a racist? NO!!
Second, are you familiar with the Savings and Loan scandal of the late 80’s and early 90’s “The Keating Five” which cost taxpayers billions, Senator McCain was reprimanded for poor judgment… But McCain’s no criminal.
Third, you must be objective with regards to our nation’s history either good or bad. If you actually listened to the entire sermon instead of sound bites you might understand.
Fourth, didn’t Senator McCain speak at an Acorn rally in 2006? Yes… So he must support voter fraud?
Fifth, the Marxist theory is based on your perception.. Redistribution of wealth means giving every American the same opportunities to provide for their families, not shipping jobs to foreign markets when people in this country can/need to work.
In addition, in my humble opinion it’s ridiculous to make accusation based on associations.
Posted by: Martin | October 24, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Pam Storts – WRONG! Palin only stands up for women she considers “pro-America”. She is not a feminist or a patriot. She is a pile of trash in an expensive outfit the GOP paid for.
Posted by: drill baby drill NOT | October 24, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Jim Rod – what’s a “lawsuite”? Why, oh why, can’t Republitards read or write their native language at an adult level?
Posted by: independent voter | October 24, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Hey Palin, here’s a label for ya’…
MORON
Posted by: Lily Bell | October 24, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Why does no one care about what Biden said about being tested and not sure is Obama will pass. US haters want us to Vote for Obama so he will sit down with them and then blow up our country. People are so dumb at least I will be able to be like Obama and how after the war wasn’t popular came out and said he didn’t vote for it when he wasn’t even in the Senate then. I can say I didn’t vote for Obama so I shouldn’t have to clean up his mess.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Republicans are the worst people on the planet. Total scum.
Posted by: angela harrington | October 24, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
One of my issues is why do people have such contempt for Palin. I might disagree with someone’s views–but I do not have any contempt for any of these candidates as people. I do not know them well enough. Neither do any of you. Again, I am all for arguing your stance, but it bothers me when someone like MAtt Damon (who normally I am a big fan of) repeats false statements that had already been proven false and disputed, as reasons for why he doesn’t like Palin. I prefer to hear strong arguments based on facts and things candidates actually said as opposed to things written about them or said in emails by other people that aren’t even true–that goes for both sides. But I feel like if a conservative actor came out and said the same false thigns that have been said about Obama and repeated those as reasons for why not to vote for him, then he would be CRUCIFIED by the media.
Posted by: TC | October 24, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Here’s the breakdown of Sarah’s wardrobe expenses for those of you who are in denial. The expenses include $75,062 spent at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis and $41,850 in St. Louis in early September. The committee also reported spending $4,100 for makeup and hair consulting. The expenses were first reported by Politico.com. The RNC also spent $4,902 at Atelier, a stylish men’s clothing store in New York. Other purchases included a $92 romper and matching hat with ears for Palin’s baby, Trig, at Pacifier, a baby store in Minneapolis.
Posted by: PhilBgood | October 24, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Pam Storts – who says we don’t care? But Biden is probably right – Obama will be tested. So what? McCain will be, too. Every new President is tested by our enemies, and, frankly, I would rather have a calm, cool, levelheaded leader like Obama is the driver’s seat than an erratic old man with a violent temper like McCain. As for the rest of your nonsensiecal rant, you’re confusing your opinions with reality again.
Posted by: common sense | October 24, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Why don’t you like her because she is like most Americans stand for freedom, less taxes and not the liberal views. My daughter who doesn’t believe in Abortion says she finally has a leader for her in this fight. When you lose a child like we have we understand why it is such a shame someone would kill their child for their own selffish benefit. I hope for a better future to one when you work harder they don’t take all the money you worked for to give it to someone who sits around blaming someone else that they haven’t gotten further.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
TC – people have such contempt for Palin because she invites it with her nasty, uber-partisan, attack-dog tactics and constant sneering, winking and hypocritical whining about how the big bad liberal media is so mean and unfair to her. Maybe if she showed some actual substance instead of going around spouting off total crap about “pro-American parts of the country” we wouldn’t consider her such a pathetic spectacle.
Posted by: rick roxx | October 24, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
If ALL the candidates have SO much money to thRow away on TV COMMERCIALS,CLOTHING,TRAVEL,CATERING,E-T-C. Then, HALLALOOYAAA !!! WE,RE ALL SAVED ! THE DEPRESSION IS SOON TO BE OVER! McCAIN,SARIE,BIDEN,and BAMA is going ta come right down here, and buy Ol JOE a brand new DOUBLE WIDE OF HIS VERY OWN !!!
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Pam Storts – Palin doesn’t stand for freedom. She stands for the abuse of power for personal vendettas and the mockery of anyone who disagrees with her extreme rightwing views. People like you don’t even know what freedom is. Pipe down already, decent people don’t want to hear your deranged crap anymore.
Posted by: bills saunders | October 24, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Sarah hasn’t only flipped flopped on being a feminist but has anyone else noticed how she is beginning to publicly disagree with McCain himself? Take the robo calls for one example and notice how she started interupting McCain during their interview with Brian Williams. Sarah knows this campaign is down the toilet and is beginning to throw McCain under the bus because she is positioning herself for a run at the white house in 2012. I just love this Republican Party infighting.
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | October 24, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
I agree with ‘For Obama Early in Flordia’ that Palin is a Evangelical Feminist. It fits her since she believes in women’s rights as long as it *fits* her evangelical religious views. In other words, she doesn’t believe in rights for anyone unless they are on her religious side. Her belief in an amendment to ban gay marriage shows this.
So if she becomes VP and maybe Prez, women should be worry. Because the next time a woman gets rape or need to abort in order to save her life in a medical situation, she will likely find out she does not have that right anymore.
Gee, so much for forward progress for women. Things will only go backward for women with Palin at the helm.
Posted by: GWP | October 24, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Pam Storts – anyone who thinks abortion is the most important issue in this election is deeply out of touch with reality. Get a clue.
Posted by: sick of whining cons | October 24, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
HEY ! Audry M. I,m a RED NECK HILLBILLY MYSELF, YA WANNA FIGHT ABOUT IT !
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
This all looks pretty sad… I guess we should all tell our daughters… now when you grow up and you want to be somebody you have to believe in killing unborn babies or they won’t like you and they will call you stupid.
Posted by: Tiffany | October 24, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Gina.. Michell Obama is not a housewife. where the heck did you get your WRONG information from?
Posted by: and.. what?? | October 24, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
PhilBgood- If history is correct when Ronald Reagan was elected Iran let the hostages go because they where afraid of what he would do. Because he is strong like MCCAIN. Isn’t it sad that your own vice-president thinks you may not answer the test correctly. They also talks about taxes will only affect the people making 250,000. I am willing to bet that anyone making over 50,000 gets higher taxes. But Obama will probably win because he is leading people to drink the kool-aid like Jim Jones did and this time the country will pay deeply. But it will not be my fault but my children will pay the price like I did under the 4 years of Jiommy Carter but after Obama it will turn alot of Democrats to vote for the next Rep. Ronald Reagan was the first Rep my dad every voted for in 1980 and he was 60 years old. May God Rest His Soul. I will not be spending any extra money for 4 years though because I will need to keep every penny I got after this Dem Congress and Pres are elected. Before you think we make alot we just make 86,000 for a family of 6. But we know he will raise our taxes.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Naw, you redneck hillbilly’s are doing just fine fighting amongst yourselves.
Posted by: Audrey M. | October 24, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
It is not the most important issue but that is why people don’t like Sarah Palin because she didn’t abort her handicap child because liberal don’t want any handicapped children in the world they want them dead.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
JOE BIDEN: “Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama. The world is looking. We’re going to have an international crisis … to test the mettle of this guy. I guarantee you it’s gonna happen.”
Of course he will be tested, look at the mess the previous administration has left for him.
Posted by: Terri | October 24, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Hey Tiffany:
Define “unborn baby” for us. This should be an illuminating diatribe.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Pam Storts – learn your history. Iran released the hostages because Reagan cut a secret deal with them. And then Hezbollah turned around and blew up the Marine barracks in Beirut. Then Reagan continued to deal with Iran & Hezbollah by swapping arms-for-hostages during the Iran Contra scandal. So much for Reagan’s silly boast that he didn’t deal with terrorists. LOL
Posted by: common sense | October 24, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
You know, as people are talking about Palin, Obama can take it easy it keep the media from talking about how he is connected to Acorn, and all the other non American things he is involved in. Wake up people and worry about who is to be our President. Do your homework, I did.
Posted by: barbara gooch | October 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
For you feminist do you believe in man’s reproductive choices to. If a man wants you to get an abortion should you have to or make it where he shouldn’t have to pay. Probably not. Feminist means equal rights not just a womans right. She had the right to choice sex or no sex. By the way Sarah Palin believes in the exception for the life of the mother. Check your facts.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Pam Storts – that is the stupidest, most vicious thing I have ever heard. I am a liberal democrat and I have a daughter with down’s syndrome who I love very much. I am extremely offended by your comment. You need to dial back your partisan rhetoric and realize that developmentally challenged children are OFF LIMITS. Nobody I know has attacked Palin for her son – people have attacked her based on her own divisive statements and “pitbul” mentality. I think you owe me – and every other liberal – a real apology. You also need to think about the kind of things you’re saying here and how they reflect on you and your party. Decent people do not take kindly to your kind of hate filled rhetoric.
Posted by: janice c. | October 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I’m sorry that is what the New York Times said about Iran that they were petrified of Ronald Reagan because he was so tough. Should have know NYT was wrong. Sorry no greater leader ever than Ronald Reagan. Bill Clinton fouled me the first time but Barack will not foul me. He hangs with bad people. And just like I tell my kids even if you are not doing something bad if you hang out with people doing bad things then people will assume you are to.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Pam Storts – And things are just so rosey right now aren’t they Pam? McSame has proudly and publicly bragged about voting with Bush 90% of the time and just look where it has got us. Have you checked the stock market yet this morning? My 401K has been trashed thanks to the policies and lack of oversight by the Bush/McCain regime. And speaking of lack of oversight and de-regulation of the financial industry that McCain supports, don’t forget that McCain was censored by his U S Senate colleagues for his role in the Keating 5 scandal. That’s right, McCain supported the same deregulations for the Saving and Loan industry that collapsed that he now supported for the mortgage industry. And you want this guy as your President? You’ve got to be joking.
Posted by: PhilBgood | October 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
um, Pam? How can a man get an abortion? You’re a wacko.
Posted by: trinity | October 24, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
You know what my hope is…. although some of us people here may be paid posters, or campaign volunteers, I do believe that some of us are “real” americans that are sincerely concerned about our country. I’m one of the real ones (I should be working but instead I’m posting) I hope both campaigns are reading these postings and other sites to get a flavor of how people are feeling.
Posted by: FS | October 24, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
I,M SICK TO DEATH OF HEARIN McCAIN, N SARIE,S GOING TO DO THIS,and BAMA, N BIDEN,S GOING TO DO THAT ! I,M LIKE THE FOLKS OF THE GREAT STATE OF MISSOURI, SHOW ME !!! S##T, I,m votin for CLENT EASTWOOD !
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
babara gooch – ACORN is an excellent organization that helps promote home ownership among low income groups. They do excellent work and many Republican politicians – including McCain himself – have praised and worked with them over the years. Get a clue.
Posted by: fact checker | October 24, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Obama is a stupid porch monkey that the Jew media is forcing down our throats! Real American patriots know that Sarah Palin is RIGHT! Obama the negro messiah is going to start a race war and kill all the whites!
Posted by: RAHOWA | October 24, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
janice c. you are wrong I heard this morning on msnbc that the feminist hate her because they don’t agree with woman who have handicapped children after they know that they are going to have these affects. They said it is cruel to have them and it is because of reasons like handicapped children that abortion should be legal. Check it out I;m sure it is on google. And how about the people who said her baby was her daughters because she didn’t look pregnant. She is a voice for handicapped children and has wants to help autisim which is near and dear to my heart. It is not hatful reddrick it is the truth if you are interested in the truth.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Pam Storts – how am I wrong? Are you telling me how I feel and what I beleive based on something you heard on MSNBC this morning? Are you invalidating my own experiences and opinions because they don’t fit into your hateful partisan argument? You are a hateful, despicable idiot. What a horrible human being you are.
Posted by: janice c. | October 24, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
The liberal media hates Sarah Palin because she tells the TRUTH and because she is an upstanding white woman who doesn’t mix races or kill her white babies like the Jew media wants her to! Sarah Palin will not commit racial suicide!
Posted by: RAHOWA | October 24, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Hey Rahowa:
Now you’re showing your true Republican colors. Thanks for the insight.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Things are rosie for us we make 2 and half times more then we did when Clinton was in office. Gas is now at 2.09 a gallon because they are finally being allow to drill for more oil not that the oil is here yet but as predicted just saying so stops the speculators. I have stopped spending though because I am afraid that Barack wants to punish our hard work and dedication. But I will always love my country even if our country takes over half of my earnings. My husband company says if they get higher taxes they will move overseas and there will be over 80,000 jobs elimanated. So we have to save our money. But nothing would make me vote for a Dem again. Foul me once shame on you. Foul me twice shame on me.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
First Gina you must not read or watch anything but Fox News. Michelle Obama is not a housewife by any means. She was an attorney and is on leave from the University of Chicago hospital. Michelle has always worked so thanks for proving you know nothing.
Secondly, it is hilarious how racist yes racist through racist back on Obama supporters when they are always the one’s that bring up that he is black. Obama has never said the “labels” you put on him are racist. He has said they are false and unproven. The only people that care Obama is black are those republicans that use it to claim that is why he is winning. Could it possibly be that people have heard his position on important topics and believe he is good for America.
You do not have to agree with his politics but it is the white republicans that are using the race and gender card along with hate filled rants. I do no like Sarah Palin and I do not agree with John McCain’s politics, although he seems to be a decent man regardless of his earlier in life indescretions.
I do no have to hate them or say demeaning this about them. I don’t have to mention anything about them personally or their affiliations which they have just as many questionable ones as Obama. I DO NOT AGREE WITH THEIR POLITICS!!!!! So stop spreading lies Obama nor Rev. Wright is a racist, Obama doesn’t pall around with terrorist, Michelle does have a career, etc. etc. Base it on politics not personal feelings one way or the other.
Posted by: Ashley | October 24, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
D#mn RAHOWA, you need to take a valium ! Your to violent, Man, get off them ENERGY DRINKS, nd quit shavin yer head .
Posted by: 1Painter | October 24, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Pam Storts is completely divorced from reality.
Posted by: common sense | October 24, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Janice c.You are wrong because that is what the liberal are saying check out you tube. It is horrible how they are treating a woman who is trying to get better needs for the handicap and Barack saying he doesn’t want his children to be punished with children. She wants for parents of special needs to be able to send their children to any school and get it paid for by the government not just the public school which doesn’t always have the best for the children. She is trulu amazing person and mother as are you if you are taking care of special needs children. May God Bless You with help.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
-You know, as people are talking about Palin, Obama can take it easy it keep the media from talking about how he is connected to Acorn, and all the other non American things he is involved in. Wake up people and worry about who is to be our President. Do your homework, I did.
Dear Miss. Barbara Gooch,
Do you HONESTLY think that there is something? Do you REALLY believe that if there were any REAL credible connections to those as you alledge that the press, the people of America, the whomever, would not present this FACTUAL information? Do you REALLY believe that if there were “something” REALLY credible that the Republican party would not have found this instead of twisting, contorting facts to present baseless assertions? Do you REALLY, REALLY believe that a citizen of the USA would withhold such possible treasonous information? I’m sorry, you come across similar to the woman at the McCain rally who “did her homework” too: “…I’m afraid…I “read” that Obama is an Arab…”
..Take some time to investigate your reading material, honey.
Posted by: FS | October 24, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
How am I divorced from reality. Because it would hurt my kids to have an inexperienced President who hangs out with bad people. My life is better than it has ever been and Right know I feel safe from al-queda but might not after first of the year.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Pam Storts – Since your husband is doing so well with his company I was just curious as to how well his 401K looks this morning? Care to share that information? BTW, are you sure your last name isn’t Snorts? With your delusional posts I’d swear you’ve been snorting something.
Posted by: PhilBgood | October 24, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I don’t think Sarah Palin knows what a feminist is.
She is the opposite of a feminist, she wants to take away women’s rights, not give them more. LOL
http://www.congratstothewinners.com/labels/Sarah_Palin.html
Posted by: FriendlyFred | October 24, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
I truly believe the media wants a Dem in office because conservative radio and tv are killing mainstream media in the ratings check it out. It is true and they want the farness doctrine to become law. We have the right to free speech Dem and we will keep it.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Sarah Palin studied broadcast journalism in college(s). If she had pursued that career she would have started out presenting the weather for a local TV station.
Next she would have been given the chance to sit at the anchor desk. The following week she would have been back to presenting the weather.
There she would have languished until discovered by Fox News.
Posted by: Sunny in the Heartland | October 24, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Clearly Pam Storts is a troll. Probably some college kid sitting in the dorm having fun getting off how people respond. IGNORE!
Posted by: FS | October 24, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
We don’t look at our 401 K. We still have 20 years to retirment the market goes up and down. Told my husband to up the amount from 8 percent to 12 percent because their are going to be some great bargains out there. Never done drugs ever because pain killers after having 5 babies. I love life in good times and bad. If I got through the death of 1 child I can get through 4 years of liberal dems. Even though I will probably not be able to send my 16 year old to college because of raising taxes.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Pam Snorts:
Hey y’all, let’s be nice to Ms. Snorts. She just was released from the ward and hasn’t balanced her meds yet.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Wish I was in college, Though sometimes feel like I was. but have to go get my kindegarden from school. My kids are the joy of my life can’t imagine anyone wouldn’t love to have them. I’m just afraid for the nation my kids will inherit that doesn’t want to be held responsible for their actions. Good news is the oldest 3 kids are involved in Young Republicans club. Sarah is a role model for young woman.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
You can call me what you want at least I have look at both records not like the people drinking the kool-aid because they don’t like Bush. Smarter than that.
Posted by: Pam Storts | October 24, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Pam Snorts:
I don’t get what you’re saying. Please take your meds.
Posted by: John | October 24, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Sunny in the Heartland
What was Biden’s major in college? Was he an athlete in high school? What was his nickname? Does his son-in-law have a PhD? How much does he pay for his clothes? What are Biden’s hobbies? What is his favorite food? What would Biden have done if he had never run for office? …. Ask Biden the same questions they as Palin. She’s been examined with a powerful microscope while Biden has been protected from the media as much as Cheney was. If the election hinges on the VP candidates, lets get to know Biden too. So far the only thing we know about him is that he thinks Obama isn’t qualified to be the President. He said that in the primaries.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
She only likes to put labels on other people.
Posted by: Bob the Virginian | October 24, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Role model for young girls. Sarah Palin.
Posted by: KIwi | October 24, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
So, is this the toughest political question a reporter will ask her? She hasn’t been on any political talk shows, she has not asked really tough questions… I think if she can’t answer this one question without a flipflop, the McCain campaign can be glad she’s not being asked any other. Let’s here it for Saray “Pal-in” around with Republicans…
Posted by: Sheila | October 24, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Let see here – Biden retorical flourishes or Palin Criminal Investigations – tell me what is worse. Not to mention the fact she still cannot tell you what the VP Job is.
Sarah Palin the most unqualified candidate ever chosen for VP.
Posted by: hottopics | October 24, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
“retorical flourishes”
Good one. It was more like an epic gaffe and a whole lot of truth.
Like I’ve said, you guys had better put a muzzle on the guy.
Posted by: Cliff | October 24, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Palin is awesome!!!
Posted by: kiwi | October 24, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
disgrace to all women: embarrassing,dishonest, lying, unethical, an ambitious political opportunist who will say/do anything to pander to her constituency, and she even has the nerve to be proud of not being too bright.
She would never be recognized as a ‘Christian’ judging from her behavior because being snide, lying and nasty aren’t ‘Christian’ behaviors. On the important stuff – feminism, etc., she is a fake. It’s more like she’s ‘the mean girl’ from high school. In fact, she said a lot of nasty things about Hillary, yet now she will use Hillary as grist for her political advantage, when she’s trying to pander to Hillary’s former base.
Interesting that the Republicans are trying to palm her off as a feminist—she puts on that hat only when it suits her— – like when she’s being interviewed by a female reporter. Meanwhile, her running mate and her party never have and still do NOT honor women at all. They do not believe in equal pay for women, do not protect women’s rights on a whole host of issues. And Palin’s comments about her $150,000.00 wardrobe are sickening in their duplicity. So, when the going gets rough, suddenly the motivation for the press attention is portrayed by her as attacks because she’s a female. No, they’re because her hypocrisy gives the lie to her being a reformer and a populist. $150,000 is more money on clothes than any hockey mom will ever be able to have or spend in her ENTIRE LIFE. Palin went on to lie and say that the clothes were not worth $150,000.00 Oh really? That’s not what the receipts say, liar. There have to be millions of other women in this country who would make a better VP than this twit.
Posted by: repubs_be_evil_liars | October 24, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Oonogil,
As member of the Senate for over 30 years, we know Joe Biden extremely well. While he is neither as bright nor articulate as the younger Obama in whom I see the best potential president to appear in my lifetime (since Ike), his experience is proven and part of the public record.
Well vetted in the primaries, Senator Biden was chosen by Senator Obama for the experience he will bring to help him in his roll as our president. Unlike Governor Palin he was not chosen by his campaign committee in a last ditch effort to shore up failing poll numbers.
Posted by: Sunny in the Heartland | October 24, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Sarah Palin is an outstanding performer and an evangelical twit….at the same time. She is not bright enough to be the Governor of Alaska, let alone President. But she’s a babe and she’s talented in front of the camera. Wind her up and she’ll go with whatever you program her to do. It’s a talent, but the opposite of what we need in a President.
Posted by: maggie may | October 24, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I have nothing against Palin, really ;-). I believe that she has not done herself any favors since she has been running with McCain. The job of the VP while campaigning is to be the “attack dog” they say…but to me it seems that Palin took it to a whole different level. Her attacks were too heavy handed and while I am sure that a lot of the attacks were fed to her, she had the choice in saying them. Instead of talking about issues, especially issues that are important to her, she spent the greater amount of time attacking Obama and being a dividing factor. I am sure, if she and McCain lose…she will get the bigger part of the blame and that is sad…because it seems that the Republican party itself is to blame for how she did on the national stage. I feel that with Palin, you either like her or you do not like her. There is not a middle ground. Middle ground is what gets you elected on a national stage. People decide that they could tolerate you. Palin does not have that. She has her big fans that she sees everyday and then she has the rest of the country that does not want to see her at all. I wish her luck in whatever she does after this. Hopefully she still has job in Alaska. ;-)
Posted by: DeAndria | October 24, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
“I’m not gonna label myself anything, Brian,” said Palin. “And I think that’s what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different . . . I’m not going to put a label on myself.”
Am I missing something…didn’t she say that she likes to visit Pro-America parts of the country…which she and McCain then had to backtrack on. And she doesn’t like labels…but she calls people socialist, terrorist, liberals…etc. She makes me laugh a lot.
Posted by: amaryee | October 24, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Commentary: Liberals let loose on Palin and Joe the Plumber – first good story I have read on CNN http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/23/navarrette.liberals/index.html
Posted by: Real Story | October 24, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Sunny in the Heartland
Great! So he shouldn’t mind answering a few questions. McCain has been asked a lot of questions and we already knew him very well. I don’t know the answers to the questions I asked, do you?
These questions were asked of Gov. Palin. Why shouldn’t we know how much Biden spends on his shoes? We know about Palin’s future son-in-law. Why not Biden’s family? The fact that Gov. Palin owns guns and hunts was criticized. Why not Biden’s strict opposition to the Second Amendment? Why can’t we talk about that?
Most Americans can’t name all 100 senators much tell you anything about them. I can’t tell you what church my own senators attend and really don’t care. Palin was asked to defend her religion. Why hasn’t Biden’s church been an issue? Palin has been questioned and examined. Why not Biden? What are they trying to hide?
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“ …..an evangelical twit”
What church does Biden go to? Add the First Amendment to the Second and Fourth Amendments and the other parts of the Constitution that the leftist don’t like. As long as we have a Constitution Gov. Palin is just as free to practice her religion as Sen. Biden is.
What is Biden’s religion anyway? Are we allowed to ask him the same questions that Palin has been asked?
Sorry I forgot, that would constitute free speech and freedom of the press and since the leftist don’t like the First Amendment……
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Nut jobs and conspiracy theorists, thats all McShame has left.
President Obama! Get used to it!
Posted by: Independent realist | October 24, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I love ABC and the mainstream media(propaganda arm of DNC and Barack Obama)
covering everything, and I do mean everything, EXCEPT the relevant facts that I require to cast my vote for McCain or Obama.
Posted by: steve | October 24, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
“I’m not gonna label myself anything, Brian,” said Palin. “And I think that’s what annoys a lot of Americans, especially in a political campaign, is to start trying to label different parts of America different, different backgrounds, different . . . I’m not going to put a label on myself.”
—————————————–
This is the smartest thing this woman has said all campaign. Yes Sarah, the American people are annoyed at your race baiting, your narrow minded, ill informed labeling of your oponent and his policies, and your divisive political views which will set this country back at least 50 years
Posted by: captain | October 24, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
OONOGIL…
Yes…”evangelical twit.” I don’t care what religion Palin practices, any more than I care if Obama is a Muslim, which he’s not. What I care about is separation of church and state (as religious as our founding fathers were, they got that part right). The evangelicals are called that because they want to impose their values on others through government programs and policies. I want to be left alone and I want the American people to be left alone–to live their lives any way they want that doesn’t harm others. Period. Gay, straight, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, abortionist and, mostly, atheists. Palin can’t keep her social conservatism out of her politics. That makes her an evangelical twit.
Posted by: maggie may | October 24, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Why did Brian Williams ask her the question if he already knew her past answer? Clearly, he was playing gotcha journalism.
————————————–
He could have said “You said in a previous interview, Governor, that you were a feminist..do you still label yourself as such?”
He left her an out, a way to redeem her herself…All she needed to do was remember what she said in the Couris interview and she would have been fine.
That’s the problem with liars. They begin to forget their lies, and since what they say isn’t based on anything, it all falls like a house of cards.
Evidence in that Gramps McCain was right there by her side in the Williams interview, because even her own running mate doesn’t trust her.
Posted by: captain | October 24, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Barack will not foul me. He hangs with bad people. And just like I tell my kids even if you are not doing something bad if you hang out with people doing bad things then people will assume you are to.
—————————————-
Pam Storts..(whose name should be “shorts” because she has as much intelligence as my “shorts”…
Please, do yourself a favor and quit embarrassing yourself, AND, do some
research before you make comments. No one can possibly take any of your comments seriously…
Have you ever heard of G Gordon Liddy?
He is one of most evil people in American History, and Gramps McCain was on his radio show last year and told him
“I am proud of you”…
Liddy was interviewed during the Branch Davidian crisis in 94′, when the Branch Davidians were under seige by the FEDS. He advised the Davidians to “shoot for the head or groin because they will be wearing bulletproof vests”…
He also was quoted as saying that he has two target practice dummies that he has named “Bill” and “Hillary”
Posted by: captain | October 24, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Police tell KDKA that a campaign volunteer has now confessed to making up a story that a mugger attacked her and cut the letter B in her face after seeing her McCain bumper sticker.
Ashley Todd, 20, of Texas, initially told police that she was robbed at an ATM in Bloomfield and that the suspect became enraged and started beating her after seeing her GOP sticker on her car. [...]
This afternoon, a Pittsburgh police commander told KDKA Investigator Marty Griffin that Todd confessed to making up the story.
The commander added that Todd will face charges; but police have not commented on what those charges will be.
Authorities are expected to release more details at a news conference this afternoon.
Posted by: rhbate | October 24, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
What I find most interesting is her unwillingless to label herself, while she simultaneoulsy skips around the country slapping labels on every person and group she encounters.
Posted by: Wendy | October 24, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Palin is very refreshing. It is nice to know that normal people will still run for office after being treated so badly by MSM. People want to write her off as if she was an air head. I think that folks don’t want to like her and therefore they won’t no matter what she does or wears.
Study up about her. Some of the things she worked out for the North American natural gas alliance will help America for decades to come against the rise of the Eastern European cartel that Russia is trying to control.
But this woman has been treated pretty badly, by many different sources.
Glad to see that she is sticking it out and crying about it.
Posted by: Joni | October 24, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I hate it when politicians change what they say! I mean Sarah Palin saying she is a feminist and then not answering it the next time put our economy and security at risk! How dare she! Give me an Friggen break you Liberal losers Obama came out and said he did not consider a threat and the next time asked he denied saying that and said they posed a grave threat, First he would meet without preconditions with Iran and other nations then just a few days later he said that is not what he said. You liberals are such hypocrites! Does Sarah Palin and her wardrobe and if she is a feminist really matter are those the issues that will decide his election? Get a life and wake up!
Posted by: batesba74 | October 24, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I think someone needs to buy Palin a dictionary.
http://www.entertonement.com/collections/5287/Palin-Inadvertently-Criticizes-Herself
Posted by: BaxterJ | October 24, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I believe that my generation of women was the first to come of age with most of us believing that the world would be fair to us.
Can you even imagine being a woman and NOT being able to vote?
Thanks to the suffragettes, America has women voters and wide range of women candidates, and we are a better country for it!
Women have voices and choices! Just like men.
But few people know ALL of the suffering that our suffragettes had to go through, and what life was REALLY like for women.
Now you can subscribe FREE to my exciting e-mail series that goes behind the scenes in the lives of eight of the world’s most famous women to reveal the shocking and sometimes heartbreaking truth of HOW women won the vote.
Thrilling, dramatic, sequential short story e-mail episodes have readers from all over the world raving about the original historical series, “The Privilege of Voting.”
Read this FREE e-mail series on your coffeebreaks and fall in love with these amazing women!
Subscribe free at
http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html
Posted by: Virginia Harris | October 24, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I”M NOT GONNA LABEL MYSELF ANYTHING! I’M JUST A HOCKEY MOM MARRIED TO A JOE SIXPACK AND DOGGONE IT I LOVES MY HUNTIN’
Posted by: GIGI | October 24, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
maggie may — Are you saying that it’s okay for you to allow your beliefs to influence your political views but not someone you disagree with? Gov. Palin has publicly stated that she believes the US to be a tolerant country and that McCain would have a tolerant administration. As far as I know, Palin, her minister or anyone she is connected with has ever uttered the phrase. “God Damn America”. That’s a little more than a “twit” ….Obama has stated that he is a Christian. I have no reason to believe him to be Muslim and it really doesn’t matter to me. I care about his political views. I don’t like what I see. A year from now we will have a president named John McCain, or wish we did. I’ll be saying I told you so.
Posted by: Oonogil | October 24, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Oonogil,
We don’t care how much Biden spent on shoes because he paid for them HIMSELF, and because he’s not being hypocritical about it. We know about Palin’s family because she’s been found to act unethically. Biden’s church hasn’t been an issue because he doesn’t use his religion as part of his political agenda (as in separation of church and sate).
About PamStorts: because she’s doing well, she’s in denial about the rest of the country, and the last 8 years of government, or that McCain / Palin is a continuation of it. I completely respect her little girl having an opinion on abortion (whatever that opinion is–it’s a layered and complicated issue). But it makes me sad that I don’t think her daughter will be encouraged to think critically or independently, or will be allowed to ever disagree with the family ‘party line’ in any way; much like, I suspect, Pam wasn’t probably encouraged to think critically or disagree either. She shows overwhelming signs of fanaticism, which makes her blind to any fact that contradicts her ideology. To change her mind, she would probably have to debunk some personal hero in her life (mom, dad, husband, who knows), from whom she copied her paranoid thought processes. A tough and unlikely endeavor.
And yet, she might be a darling person in her own personal life. Ah, the mysteries of humanity!
Posted by: andyet | October 24, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Palin is NO role model. As a woman I find her to embarrassing instead.
Posted by: roseb6889 | October 24, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Obama: Most Secretive Democratic Candidate Ever
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:58 PM
By: David A. Patten Article Font Size
Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign says his campaign will bring a new level of honesty and transparency to the White House. Obama proudly touts that he and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla, passed a law requiring more transparency via a public database of all federal spending.
But when it comes to offering the public documents about his own public and private activities, Obama’s record for openness gets an “F” grade.
During the heated Democratic primary, Obama complained of the Bush White House being “one of the most secretive administrations in our history” and chided Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.
Ironically, Obama, just days away from possibly being elected president, continues to stonewall a growing chorus of information requests for documents about his legislative, personal health, education, financing, and background — leaving many voters to cast ballots based on incomplete information.
And serious questions about his past continue to swirl as Election Day looms, fueled in part by his own campaign’s refusal to make relevant documents available.
And the press, usually banging at the door for candidates to make “full disclosure” is strangely quiet about Obama’s stonewalling.
A Newsmax survey of key Obama aspects of Obama’s public and private life continued to be shielded from the public.
Among the examples:
Obama has released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hands, released what he said was his complete medical file totaling more than 1500 pages. After criticism on the matter, last week the Obama campaign also released some routine lab-test results and electrocardiograms for Obama. All test results appeared normal, but many details about his health remain a mystery.
Obama has refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois, and has been unable to produce correspondence, such as letters from lobbyists and other correspondence from his days in the Illinois state senate. There are also no appointment calendars available of his official activities. “It could have been thrown out,” Obama said while on the campaign trail during the Democratic primary. “I haven’t been in the state Senate now for quite some time.”
Obama has not released his client list as an attorney or his billing records. Obama has maintained that he only performed a few hours of legal work for a nonprofit organization with ties to Tony Rezko, the Chicago businessman convicted of fraud in June. But he has not released billing records that would prove this assertion.
Obama won’t release his college records from Occidental College where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia.
Obama’s campaign refuses to give Columbia University, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Such transcripts would list the courses Obama took, and his grades. President George W. Bush, and presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry, all released their college transcripts. (McCain has refused to release his Naval Academy transcript.)
Obama’s college dissertation has simply disappeared from Columbia Universities archives. In July, in response to a flurry of requests to review Obama’s senior thesis at the Ivy League school, reportedly titled “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told NBC News “We do not have a copy of the course paper you requested and neither does Columbia University.”
The senator has not agreed to the release of his application to the Illinois state bar, which would clear up intermittent allegations that his application to the bar may have been inaccurate.
Jim Geraghty of the National Review has written extensively about Obama’s unwillingness to release records related to clients he represented while he was an attorney with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill, and Gallard. Obama was required to list his clients during his years in the Illinois senate. “Obama listed every client of the firm,” Geraghty reported, making it impossible to discern which clients he represented.
Obama has never released records from his time at Harvard Law School.
Obama also has not disclosed the names of small donors giving $200 or less to his campaign. An exception to the finance-reporting laws exempts the campaign from reporting those who donate less than $200, but that law never envisioned the more than $300 million that has been raised by Obama in small amounts. The Republican National Committee has released its small donors, as well as McCain’s, on a public database.
On several occasions, the Obama campaign has offered to provide additional information to reporters if they have specific questions or issues. And in some cases, it has done so.
When Internet rumors began to fly that perhaps Obama was born outside the United States, for example, the campaign released images of a birth certificate that verified his birthplace as Honolulu, Hawaii. When that led to suggestions the birth certificate had been altered, the campaign again responded, allowing reporters to examine the actual birth certificate, complete with raised seal. (In late July, according to FactCheck.org, a researcher uncovered an announcement of Obama’s birth in the August 13, 1961 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser).
Such instances of cooperation pale, however, compared to the many unanswered questions surrounding Obama, such as the financing of his education, and requests for the complete release of all donors to his campaign.
Of course, candidates are often reticent to disclose any information that opposition researchers could use against them.
But Politico.com notes that the Obama’s failure to share documents is “part of his campaign’s broader pattern of rarely volunteering information or documents about the candidate, even when relatively innocuous.”
The hue and cry from the media for disclosure usually forces candidates to release sought after documents. But the press has largely acquiesced to Obama’s stonewalling.
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us
Posted by: Buck | October 24, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Obama: Most Secretive Democratic Candidate Ever
Wednesday, October 22, 2008 7:58 PM
By: David A. Patten Article Font Size
Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign says his campaign will bring a new level of honesty and transparency to the White House. Obama proudly touts that he and Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla, passed a law requiring more transparency via a public database of all federal spending.
But when it comes to offering the public documents about his own public and private activities, Obama’s record for openness gets an “F” grade.
During the heated Democratic primary, Obama complained of the Bush White House being “one of the most secretive administrations in our history” and chided Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.
Ironically, Obama, just days away from possibly being elected president, continues to stonewall a growing chorus of information requests for documents about his legislative, personal health, education, financing, and background — leaving many voters to cast ballots based on incomplete information.
And serious questions about his past continue to swirl as Election Day looms, fueled in part by his own campaign’s refusal to make relevant documents available.
And the press, usually banging at the door for candidates to make “full disclosure” is strangely quiet about Obama’s stonewalling.
A Newsmax survey of key Obama aspects of Obama’s public and private life continued to be shielded from the public.
Among the examples:
Obama has released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hands, released what he said was his complete medical file totaling more than 1500 pages. After criticism on the matter, last week the Obama campaign also released some routine lab-test results and electrocardiograms for Obama. All test results appeared normal, but many details about his health remain a mystery.
Obama has refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois, and has been unable to produce correspondence, such as letters from lobbyists and other correspondence from his days in the Illinois state senate. There are also no appointment calendars available of his official activities. “It could have been thrown out,” Obama said while on the campaign trail during the Democratic primary. “I haven’t been in the state Senate now for quite some time.”
Obama has not released his client list as an attorney or his billing records. Obama has maintained that he only performed a few hours of legal work for a nonprofit organization with ties to Tony Rezko, the Chicago businessman convicted of fraud in June. But he has not released billing records that would prove this assertion.
Obama won’t release his college records from Occidental College where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia.
Obama’s campaign refuses to give Columbia University, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Such transcripts would list the courses Obama took, and his grades. President George W. Bush, and presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry, all released their college transcripts. (McCain has refused to release his Naval Academy transcript.)
Obama’s college dissertation has simply disappeared from Columbia Universities archives. In July, in response to a flurry of requests to review Obama’s senior thesis at the Ivy League school, reportedly titled “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told NBC News “We do not have a copy of the course paper you requested and neither does Columbia University.”
The senator has not agreed to the release of his application to the Illinois state bar, which would clear up intermittent allegations that his application to the bar may have been inaccurate.
Jim Geraghty of the National Review has written extensively about Obama’s unwillingness to release records related to clients he represented while he was an attorney with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill, and Gallard. Obama was required to list his clients during his years in the Illinois senate. “Obama listed every client of the firm,” Geraghty reported, making it impossible to discern which clients he represented.
Obama has never released records from his time at Harvard Law School.
Obama also has not disclosed the names of small donors giving $200 or less to his campaign. An exception to the finance-reporting laws exempts the campaign from reporting those who donate less than $200, but that law never envisioned the more than $300 million that has been raised by Obama in small amounts. The Republican National Committee has released its small donors, as well as McCain’s, on a public database.
On several occasions, the Obama campaign has offered to provide additional information to reporters if they have specific questions or issues. And in some cases, it has done so.
When Internet rumors began to fly that perhaps Obama was born outside the United States, for example, the campaign released images of a birth certificate that verified his birthplace as Honolulu, Hawaii. When that led to suggestions the birth certificate had been altered, the campaign again responded, allowing reporters to examine the actual birth certificate, complete with raised seal. (In late July, according to FactCheck.org, a researcher uncovered an announcement of Obama’s birth in the August 13, 1961 edition of the Honolulu Advertiser).
Such instances of cooperation pale, however, compared to the many unanswered questions surrounding Obama, such as the financing of his education, and requests for the complete release of all donors to his campaign.
Of course, candidates are often reticent to disclose any information that opposition researchers could use against them.
But Politico.com notes that the Obama’s failure to share documents is “part of his campaign’s broader pattern of rarely volunteering information or documents about the candidate, even when relatively innocuous.”
The hue and cry from the media for disclosure usually forces candidates to release sought after documents. But the press has largely acquiesced to Obama’s stonewalling.
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Print Page | Forward Page | E-mail Us
Posted by: Buck | October 24, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
If Apaulin is to shy to label herself, I will, gladly. stupid, inept, incompetent, unqualified, inarticulate, mediocer, forgetable, forgotten, devious, ….etc…..etc…
Posted by: wayne grover | October 24, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
If Apaulin is to shy to label herself, I will, gladly. stupid, inept, incompetent, unqualified, inarticulate, mediocer, forgetable, forgotten, devious, ….etc…..etc…
Posted by: wayne grover | October 24, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Pailin needs to stay at home and keep an eye on her Russian neighbors. Keep us here under the watchful eye of Obama and Biden.
She will be safe as well as the whole world.
Posted by: Hassan Naja | October 24, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Why so much Palin bashing? What did she do so wrong? I am finding alot of chauvenism from both men and women. Especially female journalist.
All of this because she is a beautiful woman. She is smart and very level headed. Cool as a Cucumber!
People in this country don’t even wince when their Senators and Congressman get caught in affairs with hookers or other gay men. Even pedophiles seem to be acceptable. It makes me sick!
What is wrong with her anyways? I really want to know? There is no evidence that she isn’t qualified.
She has an outstanding record as Govenor and really would bring fresh air into the staleness of politics.
Quit being so jealous and setting back the Feminist Movement by at least 100 years!!!
Posted by: Julie | October 24, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Is the $ 150,000 spent on Palin,s wardrobe considered an “earmark” by the Republican Party? and if so, is Palin now for earmarks?
Posted by: Steven | October 24, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Of COURSE the Steinem style feminists hate her.
Sarah Palin has proven that you can be a “suzy homemaker” and still have it all.
And that’s decidedly not what the lunatics at NOW push.
Posted by: Darryn | October 24, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Joe Biden – Is Obama qualified to be Commander in Chief?” Depends who is asking and WHEN!!!
Posted by: mdp2000 | October 24, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
To Steven:
Is the $ 150,000 spent on Palin,s wardrobe considered an “earmark” by the Republican Party? and if so, is Palin now for earmarks?
Nope. It’s not an earmark. Taxpayers did not pay for her clothes (unlike Barack Obama’s $1500 dollar suits).
And that, folks, is yet another pathetic liberal talking point smashed for the lie that it is.
Posted by: Darryn | October 24, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Does anyone know who we can directly complain to about the sexist media coverage of Sarah Palin?
Women are held to a completely different standard when it comes to their appearance. If Sarah Palin didn’t dress in the nicest clothes, all we would be hearing about is how awful her outfits are.
We all need to be active in complaining to the networks that we WON’T accept this kind of media coverage. We need to let the networks know that if this biased and sexist coverage doesn’t stop then we will boycott their network.
Posted by: E | October 24, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Does the media ever ask Obama if he is for equal rights for all ethnicities?
That makes as much sense as asking a Sarah Palin if she is a feminist.
Posted by: Jack | October 24, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Opps, someone must have forgotten to give her memo from the Katie interview that said she was a feminist!! McFlame should fire the slacker!
Posted by: Cindy | October 24, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Julie said: “What is wrong with Palin anyways? I really want to know? There is no evidence that she isn’t qualified.”
Since you ask, and not to beat a dead moose, here a few things that are wrong with Palin as a VP candidate, and potentially, as President:
- With Palin, Wasilla’s “general government” expenditures increased by 23 percent (7 percent when adjusted for inflation); overall expenditures increased by 35 percent (18 percent in constant dollars).
- When adjusted for inflation, the city’s tax revenues increased by 29 percent.
- The city sales tax, which applies to food, went up from 2 percent to 2.5 percent.
- Wasilla had a debt of $1.2 million the fiscal year prior to Palin’s arrival. But when Palin left, the city had a debt of $24.8 million – a $23.6 million increase.
- Palin was formally found to have violated the executive state ethics act.
- Palin’s taxes and expense accounts have been ‘iffy’ at best as governor. – Letting her campaign buy her clothes (unethical), for the amount of $150K (exorbitant) goes against what she says she stands for. (No one bashes Cindy McCain for wearing $300K worth of clothing in one night, because it’s her own money (well, her dad’s), and she’s not pretending to not be who she is.
- Palin believes humans and dinosaurs co-existed when the Earth was created 6,000 years ago. This wouldn’t be a problem if she had trouble keeping her religious beliefs away from her politics. But when it comes to religion-influenced ideology, like gay marriage or abortion, ‘freedom’ and ‘non-regulation’ goes out the window.
- Palin doesn’t really know what the VP function is, or worse, hopes that as a VP she can “really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes…” Yes, she was talking to an 8 year-old, but I bet you the kid could answer what newspaper he reads.
- Palin has expressed that the worse Cheney has done as VP was his hunting misshap, leading us to believe that she agrees with Cheney lying to the people about Irak and Al Qaeda, among other things. If she doesn’t see through Cheney’s deeds, she may perform similarly or surround herself with people like him.
- Palin has, through her speeches, resorted to fanaticism (”excessive intolerance of others’ points of views”), and demagogy (”impassioned appeals to the prejudices and emotions of the populace”); she’s resorted to instilling fear and hatred, a pre-condition to terrorism.
Please feel free to respond. Some of the above carries my own interpretation of facts, I know, but a lot of them are simply facts. And one more thing–my points are not gender-based. I’d love to see a woman vice-president or president. We need a woman’s unique experience and point of view. Men have been f#$*ing things up for ages. And I was a bit deflated when Obama didn’t pick Hillary. But McCain could have picked someone intelligent, curious and qualified. It was another of his ‘maverickish’ moves, with not a lot of thought behind it. Just the same way I feel he would run the country, especially when foreign policy is concerned. My view of course.
Posted by: andyet | October 24, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Meanwhile, the Obama campaign is spending $293k per HOUR this month.
That’s a serious money machine right there…
Posted by: Cliff | October 24, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Jon in Maryland – Didn’t know Christians had cornered the market on behaviour. If you consider yourself a real American then look around you. There are Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Atheists, Blacks, Whites, Asians, you name it. They are Americans too. Palin is just a puppet of the campaign. She does just what they tell her to do and says what they tell her to say and wears what they tell her to wear. Why do you think she has been shielded from the media? Just makes me sick politicians think the masses are stupid. But they were right about you. You are stupid and need to be Americanized.
Posted by: An American | October 24, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Governor Palin has been a great many things, this long and tedious 8 weeks.
Cliff,
Why do you keep writing the same thing over and over? People gave his campaign that money (of their own FREE WILL) so they could spend it. What do you suppose they should do with it?
Posted by: Strange | October 24, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Micheal (waaaay up there),
Do you not realize the Republican party had done MORE to socialize America in these last 7.9 years than the Dems have?
I know, when it is them. you call it nationalize, or bail out, or rescue.
I just appreciate the Republicans that vote for their candidates, because, by golly, they just darn well want to. These stupid arguments of communism, socialism, and terrorism makes your party look…
irrational.
Have fun, vote for your guy, and be happy!
Posted by: JustChecking | October 24, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I’m very concerned about this election and think that we are not being properly informed about one of the candidates. I know it seems crazy that there might be such a HUGE CONSPIRACY but you owe it to yourself, family and our country to read and decide for yourself. This is what I have found while researching and it seems very scary that this just might be happening. If you agree with my research and are concerned please spread the word to everyone you know and post it as many places as you can. We do not have much time left before the election. NO I’m NOT CRAZY!!! It’s your ultimate decision. The following is happening in our Presidential Election! Way to coincidental!
Here are the major activities connecting Obama to Raila Odinga:
Obama visited Kenya in 2006.
Obama was criticized by the Kenyan Government for meddling in the affairs of their government and campaigning for Raila Odinga.
Jerome Corsi has secured emails that reveal that the ODM strategy in the elections was shared with Obama’s senate office.
The strategies of the Obama camp and Raila Odinga’s ODM party in Kenya are strikingly similar.
The class issue – “elevate the emotions within all youth….be willing to vote for us in the protest.”
The media – “Since 2005, the Orange team has maintained intimate contacts across all media.” “victory in the media war could very well mean victory at the polls.”
Viral emails
Blogs/web forums
Corruption – “Branding the opponent as irredeemably corrupt will provide diversionary slavos” (Note diversionary tactic)
The age issue – “Our core supporters are essentially young people”
billboards and leaflets ridiculing the old people“
“Raila with young people – the promise of a buoyant future.”
(Note “ridiculing old people” This blog wrote about this when the Obama camp ridiculed Mccain in the video about emails)
Ethnic Tensions/Violence as a last resort – “To discourage voter participation in hostile areas.” “Use ODM agents on the ground to engineer ethnic tensions in target areas.” (Note threat of race riots in this country)
Google Raila Odinga to get further info on this association. Also Philip J Berg lawsuit against Obama. there are so many more associations and unanswered questions.
Posted by: Educating the Ignorant | October 25, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Educating dude – those are all so last week.. this week is ‘obama is just like bush’. Maybe you missed the memo.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 25, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Sarah Palin is feminisms Uncle Tom. I think McCain would do a fine job as president, at least he is uncomfortable lying. The ease with which Palin lies is frightening. I thought it was a sin to bear false witness.
Posted by: Jo | October 25, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
OONIGAL & GIGI…
I understand your position. For me, the problem with Palin and the Republican base she represents is not what SHE or THEY think, it’s that they wish to impose it on us. If they don’t want to have an abortion or marry someone of the same sex, don’t do it. But don’t try to change the Constitution to prevent others who don’t share your viewd from doing it. That’s the difference between the evangelicals and the rest of us. And it’s not what our country was founded on. It’s difficult to have a secular Muslim state because the Koran doesn’t separate church and state. Our Constitution does. When you start modifying it to reflect one set of religious preferences, you get a whole new country. That’s what I object to.
Maggie May
Posted by: maggie may | October 25, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Failin Palin: “Alaskan Independence Party”
Posted by: Obama - Biden 08 | October 25, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Hey Teddy,
Next Article…OBAMA switcheroo…one of his very first agreements he already broke…agreeing to 84 million campaign financing….then SWITCHEROOSY…no deal! Give me a break…check out your own boy, Obama…this type of journalism is “bullying”!! Get off Palin’s back!
Posted by: equalityrpt | October 25, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
if, according to Palin, a feminist would have equal rights to succeed, then we must logically assume she is not a feminist. She did not accept the VP slot by way of ability education, experience, or capability.
Posted by: jorge | October 26, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
What the hell is a feminist? If it is someone that believes in women’s rights, yes she is one. If it someone that is a lesbian and against marriage and children and into alternate lifestyles and drug use . . . than NO. Sadly, the feminist movement has been hijacked by the wackos.
Posted by: Jolie | October 28, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
For those “feminists’ who identify abortion as a feminist cause, please note that most abortions in the world are when FEMALE babies are concieved. Abortion kills more FEMALE babies than male babies because FEMALE babies are less wanted in most societies. Also, 95% of abortions are for convenience by men and women in their 20s, 30s and 40s. That should be stopped.
Posted by: Lisa | October 28, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
A feminist is one that believes in equal rights and opportunities for women. As far as abortion is concerned, since only women can get pregnant, it would make sense that they be the ones to decide whether to go through with it. If you object to abortion, don’t have one. If you are a male, don’t get a woman pregnant if she might object to having your child. Seems simple enough to me.
Posted by: henri | October 28, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
The issue of whether or not Pallin personally considers herself a feminist is clearly contradictory as a result of the media and also the interviewers. She is not able to express her true beliefs because her opinions, whether being a supporter of feminism or not, will always receive negative feedback and reactions. People judge Pallin simply because she is a female running for the Vice Presidential position. I dont like how she cannot express herself, but what else do you expect? People are harsh when it comes to Pallin and her beliefs. Pallin is, and will always be in a lose-lose situation when it comes to expressing her beliefs. Overall, one thing that she has proven is that she is a true politician because she can speak out of both sides of her mouth.
Posted by: Dana | November 2, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
The issue of whether or not Pallin personally considers herself a feminist is clearly contradictory as a result of the media and also the interviewers. She is not able to express her true beliefs because her opinions, whether being a supporter of feminism or not, will always receive negative feedback and reactions. People judge Pallin simply because she is a female running for the Vice Presidential position. I dont like how she cannot express herself, but what else do you expect? People are harsh when it comes to Pallin and her beliefs. Pallin is, and will always be in a lose-lose situation when it comes to expressing her beliefs. Overall, one thing that she has proven is that she is a true politician because she can speak out of both sides of her mouth.
Posted by: Dana | November 2, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm