Powell’s Obama Endorsement Raised at Stevens Corruption Trial
ABC News’ Jason Ryan Reports: Colin Powell’s endorsement of Barack Obama’s candidacy certainly got a lot of attention. But somewhat less well known has been his endorsement of a somewhat more controversial senator — Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, who is currently on trial in federal court for alleged corruption.
Powell was a key defense witness in the month-long trial that is expected to go the jury tomorrow. Powell called Stevens’ character "sterling" and said that "If you made a deal with Ted Stevens you knew it was good… [He] never would do anything that was improper."
But the judge in the case does not want the spotlight on Powell’s political endorsement of Obama to affect the trial. In a brief meeting with the prosecutors and defense team, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan has told both sides that in Tuesday’s closing arguments, neither side should mention Powell’s recent endorsement of Obama.
Stevens is on trial for allegedly lying on financial disclosure forms required by the U.S. Senate in an effort to hide $250,000 in home renovations and other gifts paid for by an oil services company. The senator, 84, has pleaded not guilty.
Powell and Stevens got to know each other during the Reagan administration, when Powell worked at the Pentagon and worked with Stevens on military appropriations issues.
Powell, a Republican who served as Secretary of State in the George W. Bush administration, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Clinton, and national security adviser to President Reagan, crossed party lines to endorse Obama on NBC’s "Meet the Press" Sunday.
"Because of [Obama's] ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of this campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities — we have to take that into account — as well as his substance — he has both style and substance — he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president," Powell said.
Powell said his decision is "not out of any lack of respect or admiration" for Obama’s opponent, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., but that he thinks the country needs a "transformational figure" like Obama.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
It comes as no surprise that Colin Powell would endorse Obama. Colin Powell would certainly not be where he is without the Republicans and now he wnats to promote his own agenda and slap them in the face. Poor man, he needs help – It does matter that he said on Sunday that it did not matter if Obama was a Muslin – well this nation was founded on Christian principles but since he is not from here maybe he does not know that. Powell promotes his own agenda, pure and simple. It is so sad to see a man so untruthful about why he is supporting Obama. If he wants to support him that is one thing, but does he have to slap the hands that fed him. I guess so, because that is what he has done.
Posted by: Janice | October 21, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Janice, maybe Colin Powell has begun to relaize that the Republican party is not the one he joined so many years ago. It has gone from conservative to hatered in less than eight years. I have always voted for a Republican President but Have already voted for Obama. I think he was telling the truth about why he is supporting Obama because the reasons are very similar if not exactly the same as mine. The economy and the war which have been mishandled and Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Janice -
Stop with the lies and do a little fact checking. Obama is a Christian. Obama understands more about what it means to be a Christian than you do since you persist in spreading bold faced lies. Learn how to make a legitimate political argument rather than relying on the disgusting fear tactics of the right wing.
Posted by: Informed Voter | October 21, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
JANICE:
This country belonged to RED/AMERICAN INDIANS not Christians (Please Go thru the history).
Posted by: Sam (Respect for all Religions) | October 21, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
and one more thing JANICE!
This country was built on religous tolerence for all Faiths…NO ONE GROUP OWNS RELIGON!
Posted by: ron | October 21, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Actually, Janice, most of the founders of country–even the ones who were firm Christians, rather than deists–insisted on a constitution based on the concept of natural law, not Christian theology.
This being the case, Powell is absolutely correct: While Obama is not and has never been a Muslim, it would be perfectly in line with this nation’s principles if he were.
Posted by: Martin | October 21, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Janice get real
Powell fought a long hard road
and it can be argued strongly that if it weren’t for Republicans Powell would have been President of the United States.
their lies are what got him sunk.
It is more apt to say Powell actually got the republicans their white house…if he had gone dem 8 years ago …the republicans would have lost everything…
and we would have been better off.
Posted by: dl | October 21, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Politico is running a story in which it quotes an anonymous McCain staffer as saying Colorado, Iowa and Nevada are “gone.”
Iowa is no big surprise as Obama has been up in polls there consistently and has a huge organization. But interesting about Colorado and Nevada.
The RNC pushed back with a counter release, saying it wasn’t giving up on any of those states.
What else could they say? If Obama holds all of the blue states from ’04, and adds Colorado and Nevada, he wins with that alone.
Though as a Virginia resident, I’m happy to note that Rasmussen has become the third polling organization to put Obama’s lead here at 10 points. And there’s some indicators that North Carolina could be breaking for Obama, too, though it would still be more of a surprise there.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Janice: This country was not founded by Christians nor was it founded to be a “Christian country.” It was founded by deists such as Thomas Jefferson who did not believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ and even produced his own edited version of the New Testament leaving out the bits that declare that Jesus is God. Jefferson and his compatriots well knew the dangers of a religious state and so wrote the separation of church and civil government into our constitution. A faithful Muslim is as qualified to be president as a faithful Jew or a faithful Christian or a faithful Hindu or a person of no faith. It does not matter what faith a person holds, or if he or she holds any. What matters is their ability to govern and to lead, and it is on that basis that Gen. Powell endorsed Sen. Obama.
Posted by: Eric | October 21, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
dl – actually I have heard that it is his wife that does not want him to run for office.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Now that Powell has emerged from the darkness he should start by telling us how he allowed America (as Sec of State) to be rail-roaded into the Iraq war. Once he explains that then maybe I would care about his other opinions
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Exactly Steve, Powell didn’t have the gonads to do his job and stand up against Bush and Cheney so now we need to watch his get even with them thru this public display.
Posted by: tb | October 21, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Once a Muslin always a Muslin, check their upbringing, and then there is Rev. ? Wright who is Rev. Wrong! To be raised in Chicago politics is enough for the rest of the US to say NO! The most corrupt city in the US and he has no connection to them. Yea right.
I was raised a southern Democrat until Mr. Carter, and yes the last 8 have not gone well at all, but we seem to forget 9-11 or we want to forget these people want us DEAD because they can’t tell us to bow down to the east and their wants of thinking or not think as it maybe.
Give us a free life don’t let the elitist of the left tell us how to live our lives as Bill, Hillary and now this Chicago lawyer wants us to live.
We are free because of men like McCain and my father and grandfather who raised us to stand up for what is right not close our eyes to like these people want. Just think about it, a government strong enough to give you all is very soon taking it AWAY,in the way of taxes and freedoms.
Just look back 100 years and see how many taxes there were and now, taxes on all thing we have and less freedoms.
IGNORE the media,Think for YOURSELF!
Posted by: Smitty | October 21, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
dl: “…and it can be argued strongly that if it weren’t for Republicans Powell would have been President of the United States.”
Actually I suspect Powell would have been president in 1996 or 2000 if he had decided to run. The Republicans wanted him, but he said he wasn’t interested.
He said he put his wife through a lot for his entire military career, including frequent moves, etc. Everything that comes with being an Army wife. And in return he promised her she’d make their big life decisions after he retired. She didn’t want him to run for president.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
The idea that Powell was influenced by race is an insult to the man and to black people in general. I am white and am old enough to have incorporated some racial stereotyping. But in my years the one thing that I have learned is that most African Americans are way out ahead of whites on the racial issue. They were far more willing to accept me as a white man than I had been of accepting them as black.
That said, Mr Powell’s remarks expressed my feelings about the two candidates so precisely that race could hardly have played any part in his decision on his preference. Those who say that his decision was about race are trying to deflect attention from the basic issue of the ethical and intellectual bankruptcy of modern Republicanism or they are simply too stupid to understand people different than themselves.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Eric please, I have more governing experience than Obama and Biden combined. As a matter of fact Palin has 100% more governing experience than both of them combined. That’s the problem – rethoric does not get the job done.
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Powell is no longer Bush’s Secretary of State. My belief is that being a thoughtful christian person with integrity, he could no longer represent the lies and deceit that got us into the Iraq war in order to privatize Iraq’s oil. Not all of us can wash our hands of war for profit.
Posted by: dave | October 21, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Janice…
You are a Moron plain an simple… Racist to boot… Powel bit the hand that fed him, how dare you!!! so what did George Bush do to the American people as a whole!!!! who pays George Bush’s salary?
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Oh really? One of the 90 to 94% of black Americans is endorsing another black American and possibly future employer? What a surprise!
This is a non-starter as news. Who cares?
Curious that Powell endorses this guy though. If he is a crook and Powell vouches for him does that mean he is a bad judge of character? Does that mean his endorsement of Obama is wrong?
What I want to know is who is getting paid of when?
Posted by: Robert NYC | October 21, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I think that it may be time for the Republicans to take back their party from the hater mongers who have been running this party lately. All of the good “Christian” people really need to look at themselves and their behavior. If the Democrates win this election, the Republicans will have no one to blame but themselves and their hateful ways.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Who cares if Powell voted because of race or not. I’d much sooner vote for Powell as president than Obama but please Powell, don’t lie thru your teeth and tell us Obama is good when everything you’ve fought for is counter to Obama’s philosophy. Obama is socialist just like his father.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Janice
Let us not try to twist reality to feed our own appetites of segregation. Martin summed it up. Informed voter exposed you, you can’t just proved any political arguement. Learned people don’t hide with petty issues, they engage in healthy debate. Just go home and sleep, leave politics to politicians and informed voters if you can’t handle it. we will decide for you.
Posted by: Juluka | October 21, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Robert NYC…
Why is it that after all these years, BLACK people are NOT allowed the freedom ov voting for who they want without race being a factor… Blacks have voted democrat overwhelmingly and for white candidates… you know what is sad about all you racists out there… YOU CANNOT see THE WHITE MOTHER and GRANDMOTHER that raised Obama… you only see the phenotypic color of his skin… what idiots…
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Dave, I believe the first part of your assessment — but with that as true why did he stand in front of the world and tell lies to drive us into war? Noone held a gun to his head!
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
George _” As a matter of fact Palin has 100% more governing experience than both of them combined. That’s the problem – rethoric does not get the job done.” Governing what Alaska. Are you sure she has been doing that job adequately? I will say I agree about the rhetoric. Wonder when McCain/Palin is gonna shut up and talk issues? Time is running out.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
So the Republicans argue that Powell would put his race above the nation he swore an oath to defend?
And this is the kind of guy that a Republican president makes his secretary of state? Uh oh, yet another embarrassment for the Bush Administration then. Why in the world would we want another Republican president?
And let’s talk about the Army. It promotes a guy like this, who as you Republicans now argue, would put race above country, to four stars?
And if the Army is guilty, then isn’t this really an indictment of our entire military? In fact, isn’t this an indictment of our entire way of life?
Well, I don’t know about you, but I’m not going to sit here and listen to these Republicans bad-mouth the United States of America.
<< walks out with the entirety of Delta house, humming the national anthem.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Jenny, I will say you have your Dem talking points down pat. I’m a Democrat as well but there is no way I’m voting for a socialist as president of the USA. That would be fine in China but not here.
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Would Smitty please check his spelling of “muslim”. Calling someone a “muslin” does not do anything to advance an opinion.
Posted by: Ann | October 21, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
What I’m confused about is how people can claim that Obama is a muslim (not that it matters) and also tie him to a Christian Reverend (Wright). You can’t have it both ways unless you’ve been drinking the KoolAid.
Posted by: Chandu | October 21, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Not the same Republican Party…..I voted Republican since Reagan. I used to be a Fox news Junkie and yes there was a time when I could listen to Hannity, Michele and Ann Coulter…. In the Primaries, I voted for Mitt Romney. Then something happened. I was watching CNN and I got up and went to the kitchen to get a snack and I heard someone giving a speech and I went back into the living room and saw this skinny guy. I had no idea who he was.
It was Barack Obama. I really wasn’t interested in the Democratic Party. When the Republicans nominated John McCain. I left the Party and will never look back. I occasionally flip to Fox News. I timed how long I can watch…. I haven’t gone past 60 seconds yet.
Posted by: Ron | October 21, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
MAybe not literally but you do not know what was going on behind the scenes.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Janice,
So what you are saying is Powell chose country over party, right? But isn’t McCain’s theme Country First? Republicans should tread lightly on this party loyalty….
Posted by: indy_voter | October 21, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
geaorgejones…
Please make up your mind.. is he a terrorist?, socialist, most liberal? Unpatriotic? A muslim? an Arab? I mean c’mon, could you republicans make up your mind already.. or is he all of the above??? I mean… you people soundin like Sarah Palin…
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Ron, its all window dressing. Do you really want to live in a socialist country? Read behind the dressing
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=303952499910291
Posted by: tb | October 21, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Paul – “walks out with the entirety of Delta house, humming the national anthem” Nice to hear Frat boys are patriotic.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
I don’t know how sitting in a HATE filled radical church for 20 years qualifys Obama as a Christian. Keep you heads in the sand, the man isn’t what he pretends to be, obviously Powell isn’t either with this “eratic” behavior.
Posted by: HH | October 21, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Typical racist right-wingers. “Once a Muslin, always a Muslin” (sic). And “he just endorsed Obama ’cause of race.”
I see. And how about all the white people endorsing other white people? Oh, but you don’t care about *that*, now, do you?
And if a given candidate happened to be a Muslim (the correct spelling, BTW), well, this is America. You right-wing bigots are much more dangerous to this country than anybody else. You’re basically the modern-day Klan; for you, only a white Protestant Christian will do. To you, the boxing great Muhammad Ali is probably a terrorist, too.
Your attitude is un-American, and you should be ashamed of yourselves. The real shame of it is that you’re not.
–TP
Posted by: Terrell Prude' Jr. | October 21, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Ann – “Calling someone a “muslin” does not do anything to advance an opinion.”
unless you are a cotton farmer!
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Social security is socialist. Welfare is socialist. Public schools are socialist. Fire departments are socialist. Police departments are socialist. Medicare is socialist. There are many many examples of socialism in America going way way back. It has destroyed america. So quit crying about socialism. Its alreadya part of our country and it will stay that way. Just the same as our country is a melting pot of cultures and races we are a melting pot of government styles. This is what makes us stronger.
Posted by: mitch | October 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
a theist can`t be a fascist . Collin Powel`s comment uphold the the spirit of Jesus !
Posted by: Gazi Salauddin | October 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
If Powell had stood up in the last 8 years we may not be in the middle east as we are now.
As far as christian men of old, why is the laws we have based on Christian laws or have I missed something in school over many years?
It really doesn’t matter as my Mom use to say you lay down with dogs and you get fleas, and who puts you in office is the ones who has the fleas in Chicago! Just read the history of that city in just the last 50-60 years.
We don’t need more people who won’t tell us about who put them in the office they are in now, just tell the facts of how they got there. I’m trying to put a son through college now and we can’t get the money he needs, but Obama has gotten it, but from where?
The best statement yet We live in the greatest county in the world and we have to change IT! To what another third world hole like his father grew up in?
And yes it upsets me that this country has done more to help the world that any on the face of this earth, and we are told by the media we are the worst, where else could they say this, NO WHERE. We help the world because we are the World!(Why else have people from all over have come here, if we don’t like it give it back to the Cherokees and other Native Americans and go to you home overseas) We don’t want to be the arm pit like the other place we want better and freedom is what makes it better, not government as Obama wants.
Posted by: Smitty | October 21, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Terrell…
Amen…
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
JB, I never said he was a terrorist, unpatriotic or muslim. Your allowed to be a muslim in the USA. One thing we don’t do in USA is government socialism though. That is what he stands for although he has done his best to hide it until he gets in office. I think he honestly believes that is what is right for the country. Maybe he will attain wisdom with age.
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
HH – “I don’t know how sitting in a HATE filled radical church for 20 years qualifys Obama as a Christian.” Neither does being a member of the Republican Party of Hate or voting Republican. I am telling you the things I have heard out of Sarah Palin’s mouth have been some of the scarist things I have ever heard in my life. That woman is Jerry Falwell in a skirt. Mean spirited and hateful.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 21, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Sorry for you McCain supporters who are so terribly disappointed in Gen. Powell’s endorsement of Obama. But don’t try to make it about race. That’s your problem, you attempt to support every issue you are against with such frivolous arguments. They don’t hold up. All you can come up with is fear tactics – he’s Muslim, he’s a Socialist, he’s radical, he’s Leftist, he’s a rascist. How about he’s intelligent, thinks before he acts, knows our government and how it should work since he taught Constitutional law for 10 years, he’s a Harvard-educated lawyer, he’s caring, thoughful, fair, keen mind, intuitive, all the positive attributes that a person who is Presidential material ought to have. That’s why he is winning, too. Ever think of that??
Posted by: geecee | October 21, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
georgejones: “…there is no way I’m voting for a socialist as president of the USA.”
I get such a kick out of this.
Bush nationalizes banks and buys $700 billion worth of mortgage backed securities, and you guys are calling Obama socialist…
…over the fact that his progressive tax rates are 3 percent higher than McCain’s progressive tax rates for amounts over $250k?
Sorry, but you guys, and your candidate, are just making ludicrous arguments now.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Mitch, in case you hadn’t noticed soc security is a joke. Obviously there are degrees of socialism but those things are not what has made USA what it is. Those are bandaids for problems. If you want socialism go to China.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Powell has every right to back whichever candidate he likes. That may not be the party line but it is the American way. In a free country you are entitled to your own opinions. The Republicans do not own Colin Powell and the whole line of thought that he owes them something is ludicrous and indicates what is wrong wiothy our country. The Repubs got a lot of use out of Colin Powell, but he refused to tow their line when it was so different from what he thought was right. That Colin Powell divorced himself from “W” and no from the candidate who would continue down the “W” path is a good indication that Colin Powell is his own man, not somebody else’s.
I may not agree with Colin Powell, but I do respect him. There does not seem top be very much respect left in this country. Am I a Democrat? No. Am I a Republican? No. I’m an American, and I’m sick of what our country has become.
Posted by: TLW | October 21, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Steve 11:08 said
“Obama is a socialist just like his father”
This is an expression of stupidity almost like saying being a socialist is inherited. His mother and grandmother were more formative to him than his father according to Obama. He hardly knew his father.
If one feels compelled to make the inaccurate assessment caused by partisan blindness that he is a socialist that is one thing but to say it comes from his father is insulting to the readers and makes everything else you say sound silly.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
I’m a 59 year old Colorado homebuilder, an independent voter and I can tell you Powell’s presentation on “Meet the Press” resonated with me. Reading the post from this hateful woman Janice just reinforces my image of a Republican party that has been overtaken by partisan power hungry,greedy, provincial and insensitive white supremicists. I am so glad I left that party. The only hope I see for it is for it’s members to reform as the NAZI party and then they can all die and go to hell. I do want to see intelligent debate on the issues and hope the Republican Party can reform and clean their house – there is an awful stink coming from them now.
Posted by: Robin from Colorado | October 21, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Smitty…
McCain and George Bush is the Reason you are having problems putting your son through college… STOP and THINK before you write… Bush with McCain’s help has semt this country down the crap shoot… its time for a change.. a new direction, a new hope and most of all togetherness… OUR strength is our UNITY, not hate.. a country divided against itself ESPECIALLY because of color, will not stand, cannot stand, and would not stand…
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Paul, we all agree Bush is an Ahole. I didn’t vote for him.
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Smitty: “If Powell had stood up in the last 8 years we may not be in the middle east as we are now.”
He wasn’t the president. He was a member of the president’s cabinet.
From what I understand, he did voice his opposition to the invasion early on, but when the decision was made by his boss, he supported it.
Sure, he could have resigned right there. And his presentation before the UN was truly a low point for him.
But let’s remember that McCain was the biggest cheerleader for this invasion. He was calling for it on the David Letterman Show, in October of 2001 – weeks after the terrorist attacks. McCain was out in front of Bush on wanting to invade Iraq.
So… if you’re going to vote for McCain, on the basis that Powell endorsed Obama, and Powell supported the war effort…
See the obvious contradiction here?
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Al Quaeda attacked the US in 1993, the first year of President Clinton.
Al Quaeda attacked the US in 2001, the first year of Georg W. Bush.
And if their history repeats itself, Al Quaeda will probably try again next year, the first year of the new President.
So what else is new?
I noticed that trend in 2001, after 911. That’s Al Quaeda’s M.O.D.
They want to test the new President. That’s why they did it in the first year of Clinton’s and Bush’s presidency.
Hope to god we do not have to rely on the teleprompter guy!!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | October 21, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Powell and Stevens got to know each other during the Reagan administration, when Powell worked at the Pentagon and worked with Stevens on military appropriations issues.
Sounds like it was pay back time for Powell….
Ya the pots all call the kettles shinny when they are indebted!
Posted by: HP Boston | October 21, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
georgejones – tell the truth, did you support Bush’s tax cuts and their obvious preferences toward the wealthy?
Because if you didn’t, the only thing you might not like about Obama’s tax proposal is that it doesn’t do enough to reverse the Bush approach.
And just to be clear about what I’m saying, Bush was the tax radical and not Obama now. If Obama’s plan had been proposed in 1998, we might all presume it was a Republican plan.
I believe Obama’s top rates in his progressive scale is the same as what we had during the Reagan Administration.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Those who say Obama will make us into a socialist country are out of touch with our economy today. We have partially nationalized the banks, AIG and completely nationalized Fannie and Freddie. So if you are afraid of what Obama might do it is unfounded. Bush has already done it.
Before speaking about economics get a little education first.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
HP Boston…
“Hope to god we do not have to rely on the teleprompter guy!!!!”
OH PLEASE!!! I hope to God we do not have an erratic and poor judgment McCain… WE will be in WWWIII for sure… we need INTELLIGENCE, COOL and CALM TEMPERMENT and someone with SOLID JUDGEMENT who will LISTEN to Counsel and NOT just the YES men that McCain surrounds himself with.. PRAY Sarah PALIN is NOT int eh white house because we will be screwed…
Posted by: jB | October 21, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
So much for all that talk about unity and reaching across the isle. I guess again, it’s all just hot air, as if McCain, The Admin & the others like Rush truly believe this, they should RESPECT Powell. Afterall, it took him quite a while to decide, so it wasn’t with haste the decision was made, unlike some others we know…..
Posted by: solsenz | October 21, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Ronnn, before you blow-off calling people stupid you might want to do a little research. Obama wrote a book called “Dreams of my Father.” (Media accounts portray Obama’s father as being completely out of his life after leaving his mother and him at age 2. But Obama’s first book, “Dreams From My Father,” reveals that he remained an influential force in his life. Obama’s first autobiography was devoted to “my father.”)
Listen to what “the Old Man,” as Obama and his siblings called him, wrote in proposing government-run farms: “If left to the individual, consolidation will take a long time to come. We have to look at priorities in terms of what is good for society, and on this basis we may find it necessary to force people to do things they would not do otherwise.”
He explained that “the government should restrict the size of farms that can be owned by one individual throughout the country.”
More evil than individuals, Obama’s father believed, are heads of corporations. More evil still are the bankers and investors, who conspire to control the world through their evil capitalist system.
“One who has read Marx cannot fail to see that corporations are not only what Marx referred to as the advanced stage of capitalism,” he wrote. “But Marx even called it finance capitalism by which a few would control the finances of so many, and through this, have not only economic power but political power as well.”
Like they say Ronnn, sometimes the aquisition of knowledge is not a pretty thing. But at least you know now.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Powell said that Obama’s leadership in the financial crisis was steady and McCain seemed unsure. One area of expertise that Powell has is on accessing leadership.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
jB – I agree completely. After watching McCain and Obama through two situations – first a foreign crisis with Russian tanks running all over Georgia, and second this current economic crisis – I’ll take Obama any day of the week and twice on Sunday.
An erratic, kneejerk and overly emotional president just isn’t what will serve us best.
And truth be told, I’m almost prefer Palin to McCain. At least she would know she’s in over her head, and thus be more likely to rely on others. McCain would just do what he always does – make quick, emotional decisions, some of which would be inconsistent with earlier decisions.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Obama never told Sen. Macc looks like a monkey. So why he chosen sarah palin as his running mate ?
Posted by: polan | October 21, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Ronn, noone is trying to follow the Bush model — that is what we are trying to change and the only one who even questioned the buyout was republicans. Obama left a number to call if they need him.
Posted by: gerogejones | October 21, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
** They want to test the new President.
** That’s why they did it in the first
** year of Clinton’s and Bush’s presidency.
** Hope to god we do not have to rely on
** the teleprompter guy!!!!
And why not? I imagine you are one of those people who believe that when a handful of people attack us, we should respond with 100,000 or so troops, armor and bombs. If so, then consider this. Al-Queda consisted of roughly 1500 individuals in 2000. 9/11 was carried out by 19 individuals.
How much have we spent so far, in terms of both cash and lives? And where is Bin Laden again? So what exactly did we accomplish for all of that.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Obama displayed leadership during the financial crisis? I thought he said call me if you need me? Those were his words — I saw him say it?
Posted by: tb | October 21, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
WHEN IT’S ALL OVER AND DONE , THEN IT BE TOO LATE TO GO BACK AND CORRECT TWO WRONGS, ELECTING OBAMA WILL BE THE END OF AMERICA AND YOUR FREEDOM ., HE HAS BEEN GROMRED TO PLAY HIS PART AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE TO STUPID TO SEE IT. MAY GOD HELP YOUR SOUL AS YOU GOING TO NEED IT. BEST YOU WAKE UP BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE……
Posted by: ARTHUR BURRIS | October 21, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Arthur apparently lives in a very dark and scary place.. in his mind.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
America needs a transformational leader who understands the people, and whom the people understand. And not to forget, since the American President is virtually the most powerful person on the globe, thus he needs to be Charismatic enough to inspire, Honest enough to be believed, Intelligent enough to be respected and followed, Visionary enough to see decades ahead.
And this is the reason Obama is going to be the President of America.
Posted by: Ravindra | October 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
There is a silver lining, after two years of the Democratic party in charge, the people will see their ineptitude and elect a Republican Congress and Senate.
What have they done so far? They control Congress and have been sitting on their hands. They made a lot of promises to get control of Congress and have not produced.
I expect the same will happen with B. Hussein Obama. Now, don’t get me wrong. I work with Muslims. They are a good people. It’s the radicals you have to fear, not the Muslim people. But BO I don’t trust because of Ayers and Wright. There’s more there below the surface. Open your eyes people.
Oh, and a Christian? He went to church for 20 years and does not know what they preach? hahahahaha
Posted by: Wes | October 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
I’m voting for the best American to unite us and lead us into the future.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=303952499910291
Posted by: Joe Lane | October 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Yeah Arthur, I don’t like Obama but even I think you went a little over the top.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“Obama left a number to call if they need him.”
And McCain made a kneejerk decision to suspend his campaign…
Came to Washington, where he found out he really had nothing to do and nothing to say…
Went back on his word not to debate without a bailout deal (thus suspending the suspension of his campaign)…
Flew back to Washington (thus suspending the suspension of the suspension of his campaign)…
Found he still had nothing to do and couldn’t really rally his Republicans to support his own position…
Went back out on the campaign trail (thus suspending the suspension of the suspension of the suspension of his campaign)…
And wondered why everyone was calling him erratic.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
** What have they done so far? They control Congress and have been sitting on
** their hands. They made a lot of promises to get control of Congress and
** have not produced.
Since Bush has been in office, he has vetoed 11 bills. Only one of those was when the Republicans controlled congress. If you are claiming that Congress has not done anything, maybe you should look a little closer.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Paul, you’all are complaining about the Bush buyout but McKane and his guys are the only ones who questioned it or it would have been even worse. If not for the political ramifications/pressure of the election I don’t think it would have gone thru.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
The buddha taught us to be intentionally kind. People who get their kicks out of hate would call that naive. Examine the way you think. The unexamined life is not worth living. Kindness of thought, word and action is how to live in harmony with the continuum of universal energy.
Posted by: John Stubbs | October 21, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
** but McKane and his guys are the only ones who questioned it
You do have a selective memory.. go back and check the news articles.. both questioned it, and Obama even set 4 conditions before he would even consider voting for it.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Oh, and I forgot to mention Powell in keeping with topic, I’d have voted for him for President, but not now. His credibility is in the dirt as far as I am concerned. Did he endorse BO because he’s black? Who knows?
Posted by: Wes | October 21, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Steve:
I will not get into the weeds with you. Obama is not a socialist. Obama’s economic thinking was not influenced by his father.
I apologize for calling you stupid it was out of line. What you are implying that his father influenced him to be socialist is silly. That his father influenced him to be sensitive to people are are disadvantaged I agree. The createst influence on his economic thinking came from the time he was at the University of Chicago where he realized that markets are important to consider along with what will benefit the society in general.
Obama’s thinking is rather unique and since you are against anyone who places great importance on anyone who is not a leader you misunderstand Obama. He is influenced by many philosophical points of view including socialism. You cling to that because you are a McCain supporter and McCain is using socialism to distract people from the fact that his economic policy is a proven failure and are the origin of the economic trouble that has been brewing since before the collapse of Lehman.
Just so I am crystal clear. Obama’s father may have been a socialist I do not know. Obama may have adopted some of his thinking from his father but he has gained thinking from the Freidman thinkers at the University of Chicago as well. Obama is a nuanced thinker and nuance has no place to fit in your rigid formulated way of thinking. But I do agree you are not stupid.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Steve: “Paul, you’all are complaining about the Bush buyout but McKane and his guys are the only ones who questioned it or it would have been even worse.”
No, not correct. McCain didn’t question it. In fact, he had nothing to offer when asked.
Obama questioned it, during a formative stage, and his contributions led to substantive changes in the bill. Granted, Obama was primarily voicing a combined Democratic Party position, being brought into this gimmicky play by McCain and Bush.
House Republicans questioned it. And to win their approval, the Senate added in an additional $140 billion of fluff.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I THINK THAT IT DOSENT MATTER WHAT RELIGON IT MATTERS WHOS GOING TO HELP AMERICA AND THATS BARACK OBAMA. IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE!
SI SE PUEDE
Posted by: BEAUTY | October 21, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
No surprise in Powell endorsing Obama. Birds of a feather flock together, eh?
I have decided to vote EARLY for McCain/Palin.
I am a registered Democrat but I am alarmed that Obama//Biden /Pelosi/Reid have become extreme SOCIALIST LIBERALS who want to “spread the wealth”.
Every US immigrant who came from a communist country/dictatorship (and are US Citizens and planning to vote) should be APPALLED, since many came here to escape from that kind of suppression.
I DO NOT want the government to give my hard-earned money to lazy bums who are just waiting for hand-outs.
Posted by: Birds of a feather | October 21, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I did not think that there were too many people stupid and ignorant enough to keep saying Muslin outside of the skits portraying these idiots on SNL. Yet, this thread is proof that indeed there are plenty.
Muslin is a type of finely-woven cotton fabric, introduced to Europe from the Middle East in the 17th century. If you’re going to slam someone for being a Muslim (even if they aren’t) at least learn how to not make a complete fool of yourself.
Posted by: ranndino | October 21, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Well Ronnn, thank you for relabeling me as “not stupid.” I’ll be able to sleep tonight. I don’t think McCain is the answer to all problems but if you think that Obama’s “vast” knowledge and experience gives him the insight to suggest a fundemental change to the way the US government should operate then I believe you have been brainwashed — as Obama sounded when he wrote his 2 fantasy books — which I suggest you read for more insight. Trust me, they are a tough read and you will need hip boots.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
And to follow up that previous one, you McCain supporters are talking about something that just happened a few weeks ago – something we all saw play out.
That’s the thing about this McCain campaign. Its so rooted in fantasy, supporting it now requires you to look at a blue sky and agree with the campaign its actually green.
We all saw what happened. We all saw McCain’s erratic performance.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Birds of a Feather -
First of all watch the actual Meet the Press interview. Powell explains in detail why he has decided to vote for Obama and his reasons are extremely well thought through and objective. I have a feeling that people like you are dismissing his endorsement without even having actually seen it for themselves.
Also, I guess you’re for giving out your hard earned money to greedy corporations and large banks who have gotten us into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression to bail them out. That’s not Socialism, is it?
Posted by: ranndino | October 21, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Isn’t ironic or what in this freeking twisted election?
Zero came to being pretending he has always been an “anti-War” hero, yet he is so profoundly honored without question by the endorsement from the very person who sold the War to the world and helped to start the War and kept silence when all went hell.
As long as it’s Zero, it’s good enough to Zero-supporters. Now, a war criminal has become Zero’s and supporters’ best friend.
Posted by: d0 | October 21, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
The poles show Obama ahead in states like NC CO MO in the past Republicans have won here, I truly do feel that he is ahead in these states because of the black vote I’m not a racists but when I hear people say things like some whites aren’t voting for Obama because he’s black, it angers me because it’s very clear he is winning in these state because of the black vote so you tell me who is being racists here , if he was white I don’t think he would have such a lead even Powell said it would electrify the world if he wins, he said this because Obama is black and the rest of the world has always viewed the USA as a place were minorities don’t have many rights and if we put Obama in office then that might change the way we are viewed by the rest of the world. I’m a Republican and it sad to say that at one point I was considering voting for Obama mainly for the same reasons Powell is but now I’m voting for McCain because I feel he is being attacked because he is white my daughter has a good friend who is black last weekend my daughter went to church with her and her mom this was a all black church after they got home her friend said she was sorry by the way all the people at her church had treated my daughter she said they were rude and stared at her all the time as if they were saying why are you here your white it has always been a double standard in this country if a white person does something based on the fact that they are white then it’s racists but if a black person does sometihng based on the fact that they are black then it’s Ok there are some great people of color in this country some who have done great things for the USA but it always comes down to race and it is very clear why Powell has sided with Obama
Steve in CA
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Paul, I know that McCain did not say a lot while the cameras were on but my understanding is that the Dems were rail-roading the bill thru before McCain and the Reps could even get there to talk. that is why Barney Frank said McCain was slowing down the process (I saw him say it). To me it should have been slowed to a stop — but that is another subject. At any rate, the Reps were the only ones who even questioned the socialism express. Although you seem to speak as though you were there so maybe you know something more?
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
** I DO NOT want the government to give my ** hard-earned money to lazy bums who are
** just waiting for hand-outs.
The government has been for many, many years with various social welfare programs. And I suppose you are ok with you being taxed more so it can be given to the wealthy? Now there is a real ironic twist in your logic. Not to mention that taxes are used for government spending, very little goes to wards social programs. And why do you suppose the economy is tanking and we are slipping into a recession? Well, the National Bureau of Economic Research (the guys who give us our GDP figures) put it nicely:
“Never in the history of modern economics has a large industrial country run persistent current account deficits of the magnitude posted by the U.S. since 2000″
Why do you suppose that is? We had a balanced budget when Clinton left office.. and Bush with his first round tax cuts managed to raise the deficit by $133 billion in his first year and hasn’t stopped since. And McCain would like to continue down that merry road.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
COUNTRY FIRST, MY A__!!!! MCCAIN’s DECISION IS A JOKE AND INSULT to US AMERICAN”S INTELLIGENCE!! PALIN THE PARROT!!
OBAMA 08!!
Posted by: Sam (Respect for all Religions) | October 21, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
COUNTRY FIRST, MY A__!!!! MCCAIN’s DECISION IS A JOKE AND INSULT to US AMERICAN”S INTELLIGENCE!! PALIN THE PARROT!!
OBAMA 08!!
Posted by: Sam (Respect for all Religions) | October 21, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
COUNTRY FIRST, MY A__!!!! MCCAIN’s DECISION IS A JOKE AND INSULT to US AMERICAN”S INTELLIGENCE!! PALIN THE PARROT!!
OBAMA 08!!
Posted by: Sam (Respect for all Religions) | October 21, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Patriot, I agree with everything you said until you said “McCain would like to continue down that merry road”. McCain’s record does not suggest this. You are just spouting an untrue Dem talking point. Think about how that idea got in your head.
Posted by: tb | October 21, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
The Democratic Party is a big tent party. It attracts people with diverse backgrounds and viewpoints. The Republican Party is a small tent party. Its tent consists of a white sheet with two holes cut out to see through.
Posted by: hamishdad | October 21, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
** McCain’s record does not suggest this.
Please show me where McCain differs significantly from Bush in his stance on taxes.
And keep in mind, in 2000 when McCain was running for office against Bush, he opposed Bushs tax cuts:
“Governor Bush wants to give 38 percent of his tax cuts to the wealthiest 1 percent. I want to give it to working families.”
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/election/jan-june00/mccain_2-2.html
He now holds the exact same position.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Janice: Muslim..MusliM, with an M… Muslin is a flimsy cloth…A Muslim is an adherent to a religion that advocates peace and tolerance. Fundamentalists (of all religious and ideological stances) like yourself are the cause of so many of the worlds problems, and I think that’s what you driving at. If you want to confront fundamentalism and intolerance, start with a mirror. Your own arguments only serve to highlight your shallow understanding. Go back to school and study some more, then you can come out and play with the big kids.
Posted by: jmn | October 21, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Birds of a Feather: “Every US immigrant who came from a communist country/dictatorship (and are US Citizens and planning to vote) should be APPALLED, since many came here to escape from that kind of suppression.”
In the fantasy world in which you potentially live, exactly which Obama policies should alarm immigrants from communist countries.
Is it the fact that – oh my gosh – Obama is proposing progressive tax rates?
Lol, I’ve never seen a campaign fall apart on message like this McCain campaign.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I don’t trust Barrack Hussein Obama and
I don’t trust any of his associates, past or present.
Therefore, I vote for McCain/Palin
God Bless America
Posted by: ltk01 | October 21, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I don’t trust Barrack Hussein Obama and
I don’t trust any of his associates, past or present.
Posted by: ltk01 | Oct 21, 2008 12:34:12 PM
—
How can you not trust our Savior Hussein 0bama who is trusted by the once honorable General Colin Powell who has the good judgment of selling Bush’s War to get rid of the dictator Hussein, and has the honorable integrity and loyalty to keep silence when all hell broke.
Posted by: d0 | October 21, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Listen Steve. If this country is going to make the strides it needs to make then people like you and I need to be able to talk to each other and calling you stupid is a hinderance to that. You don’t have to return a sarcastic remark. I did not relabel you anything. I simply apologized for stepping out of line and withdrew the label.
Saying I am brainwashed because I do not agree with you is as out of line as I was.. Give some thought to what I am saying because I am a nuanced thinker the way Obama is and if you are smart and learned to deal with people like us then you will be able to make some political headway when Obama is president even though you may not agree with him 80 to 90% of the time.
The government already is operating in the way that you think is so terrible. Incorporate that into your brain. It will continue to operate that way until this crisis is over. But we are not going to have socialism, it simply does not fit in the ethos of what makes this country great. However if you think that the inequities that Bush created in the last eight years are not going to be reversed to a great extent you are incorrect. Though no one has labeled it as such Bush was taking us toward fascism which is equally bad.
Obama’s strength is not in the vastness of his knowledge. It is in his ability to incorporate other peoples thinking into his own and make sound judgments on the basis of that process. His leadership style is ideal for being president but not of great value in being senator. McCain style is better suited for being senator and for that reason he has been a better senator until the last two years when he gave up his integrity to seek office.
I realize that what I am saying you may not comprehend but it is said with the best of intentions since I feel this country will be better off if people like ourselves can get along politically by finding where there is common ground and work from there.
Posted by: Ronnn | October 21, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Powell called Stevens’ character “sterling” and said that “If you made a deal with Ted Stevens you knew it was good… [He] never would do anything that was improper.”
—
This is the kind of judgment from whom Zero and Zero supporters can trust.
Posted by: d0 | October 21, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
** This is the kind of judgment from whom Zero and Zero supporters can trust.
Good thing we aren’t voting for Powell, isn’t it!!
Yet, you apparently have no problem voting for a ticket that has as one party someone who has been found to have already abused power and violated state ethics laws.
Funny how that works..
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Steve: “Paul, I know that McCain did not say a lot while the cameras were on but my understanding is that the Dems were rail-roading the bill thru before McCain and the Reps could even get there to talk.”
Not true. The Democrats were the first to object to the Republican treasury secretary’s approach, and opened discussions with him.
During that time, there was opportunity for anyone to be involved. This notion that the Republican treasury secretary and the Republican administration he worked for wouldn’t listen to the concerns of House Republicans is a little odd.
Yes, the primary negotiators were one Republican and one Democrat from each house of Congress. And, yes, apparently a lot of the House Republicans didn’t like their representative there.
That’s a party leadership issue.
Whether true or not, the Republican treasury secretary speaking for the Republican administration was saying this had to be passed in days to prevent a seizure of credit. Apparently a lot of folks from both parties bought into that, and the rush was on.
McCain bought into that. I remember him saying that we needed an agreement before the next Monday morning trade session begins to avoid catastrophe. So despite what Barney Frank may have said, my ears tell me McCain was part of the rush, not part of the delay.
Frank may have been saying that McCain inadvertantly delayed the process by his campaign stunt. I think actually that is what happened.
As Obama and the Democrats were saying, the White House meeting was silly, and they recognized it as political grandstanding before the fact. But still, they attended in good faith.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Ronnn, Obama is the most left wing senator in the country and has never worked accross the isle. Just because he says he will bring people together in a stump speech that doesn’t make it true. You’ve got to look at what he has actually done. He seems like a conman.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
** He seems like a conman.
Maybe to you. He has worked in a bi-partisan fashion on several bills. He is a liberal, yes, but hardly a radical one, and has a history of bringing together differing opinions.. it is one of his strengths. And if he is such a rabid left winger, how do you explain the Chicago Tribunes endorsement of Obama?
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Steve – the Republicans tried that line before, and Sen Lugar said, “yes Obama did work across the aisle, with me.”
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Forget about neutral fact checkers. Its pretty bad when a campaign’s claims don’t even get past its own party members.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“how do you explain the Chicago Tribunes endorsement of Obama?”
Simple, they think he is going to win and they want to be on the bandwagon. The media has failed Americans big time. Keep in mind Kerry led Bush in polls by 11% on election day — so it may backfire on them. We learn time and gain that the polls are consistently wrong.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
“Its pretty bad when a campaign’s claims don’t even get past its own party members.” Paul, you hit the nail on the head. This has little to do with Obama or McCain. This has to do with Powell getting even with republicans. Sadly, I wish he would have used the same vengance to standup for what he believed, did his job and kept us out of Iraq when he had the chance. Now I need to listen to his irrelavent opinions on TV after years of Iraq. I wish he’d crawl back into the hole he’s been hiding in.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
** Simple, they think he is going to win and they want to be on the bandwagon
Really? You do know that the Chicago Tribune has never endorsed a democratic presidential candidate in their 136 year history, right? Their first leader was on of the founders of the GOP and they have maintained that party line ever since.. until this year. They never jumped on the ‘bandwagon’ before.. funny that they would pick this year to do so, don’t you think? Might just be a reason.. if you are so inclined, here is their explanation:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-chicago-tribune-endorsement,0,1371034.story?track=email-alert-breakingnews
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I wanted to send this article from Huntley Brown – he is a fabulous concert
pianist, man of God and is a black man.
Why I Can’t Vote For Obama By Huntley Brown
Dear Friends,
A few months ago I was asked for my perspective on Obama, I sent out an
email with a few points. With the election just around the corner I decided
to complete my perspective. Those of you on my e-list have seen some of
this before but it’s worth repeating…
First I must say whoever wins the election will have my prayer support.
Obama needs to be commended for his
accomplishments but I need to explain why I will not be voting for him.
Many of my friends process their identity through their blackness. I process
my identity through Christ. Being a
Christian (a Christ follower) means He leads I follow. I can’t dictate the
terms He does because He is the
leader.
I can’t vote black because I am black; I have to vote Christian because
that’s who I am. Christian first, black second. Neither should anyone from
the other ethnic groups vote because of ethnicity. 200 years from now I
won’t be asked if I was black or white. I will be asked if I knew Jesus and
accepted Him as Lord and Savior.
In an election there are many issues to consider but when a society gets
abortion, same-sex marriage, embryonic
stem-cell research, human cloning to name a few, wrong economic concerns
will soon not matter.
We need to follow Martin Luther King’s words, don’t judge someone by the
color of their skin but by the content
of their character. I don’t know Obama so all I can go off is his voting
record. His voting record earned him the
title of the most liberal senator in the US Senate in 2007.
NATIONAL JOURNAL: Obama: Most Liberal Senator in 2007 (01/31/2008)
To beat Ted Kennedy and Hilary Clinton as the most liberal senator, takes
some doing. Obama accomplished this feat in 2 short years. I wonder what
would happen to America if he had four years to work with.
There is a reason Planned Parenthood gives him a 100 % rating.
There is a reason the homosexual community supports him.
There is a reason Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro, Hamas etc. love him.
There is a reason he said he would nominate liberal judges to the Supreme
There is a reason he voted against the infanticide bill.
There is a reason he voted No on the constitutional ban of same-sex
marriage.
There is a reason he voted No on banning partial birth abortion.
There is a reason he voted No on confirming Justices Roberts and Alito.
These two judges are conservatives and they have since overturned partial
birth abortion. The same practice Obama wanted to continue.
Let’s take a look at the practice he wanted to continue
The 5 Step Partial Birth Abortion procedures:
A. Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby’s leg with forceps.
(Remember this is a live baby)
B. The baby’s leg is pulled out into the birth canal.
C. The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head.
D. The abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull. The scissors are
then opened to enlarge the hole.
E. The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child’s
brains are sucked out, causing the
skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.
God help him.
There is a reason Obama opposed the parental notification law. Think about
this: You can’t give a kid an aspirin
without parental notification but that same kid can have an abortion without
parental notification. This is insane.
There is a reason he went to Jeremiah Wright’s church for 20 years.
Obama tells us he has good judgment but he sat under Jeremiah Wright
teaching for 20 years. Now he is condemning Wright’s sermons. I wonder why
now?
Obama said Jeremiah Wright led him to the Lord and discipled him. A disciple
is one in training. Jesus told us
in Matthew 28:19 – 20 ‘Go and make disciples of all nations.’ This means
reproduce yourself. Teach people
to think like you, walk like you; talk like you believe what you believe
etc. The question I have is what did Jeremiah Wright teach him?
Would you support a White President who went to a church which has tenets
that said they have a
1. Commitment to the White Community
2. Commitment to the White Family
3. Adherence to the White Work Ethic
4. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available
to the White Community.
5. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for
Strengthening and Supporting White
Institutions
6. Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the
White Value System
7. Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.
Would you support a President who went to a church like that?
Just change the word from white to black and you have the tenets of Obama’s
former church. If President Bush was a member of a church like this, he
would be called a racist. Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton would have been
marching outside. This kind of church is a racist church. Obama did not
wake up after 20 years and just discovered he went to a racist church. The
church can’t be about race. Jesus did not come for any particular race. He
came for the whole world. A church can’t have a value system based on
race. The churches value system has to be based on biblical mandate. It
does not matter if it’s a white church or a black church it’s still wrong.
Anyone from either race that attends a church like this would never get my
vote.
Obama’s former Pastor Jeremiah Wright is a disciple of liberal theologian
James Cone, author of the 1970 book A Black Theology of Liberation. Cone
once wrote: ‘Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified
totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and
against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.
Cone is the man Obama’s mentor looks up to. Does Obama believe this?
So what does all this mean for the nation?
In the past when the Lord brought someone with the beliefs of Obama to lead
a nation it meant one thing – judgment.
Read 1 Samuel 8 when Israel asked for a king. First God says in 1 Samuel 1:9
‘Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king
who will reign over them will do.’
Then God says 1 Samuel 1:18 ‘ When that day comes, you will cry out for
relief from the king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in
that day.’ 19 But the people refused to listen to Samuel. ‘No!’ they said.
‘We want a king over us. :20 Then we will be like all the other nations,
with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles.’ 21
When Samuel heard all that the people said, he repeated it before the LORD.
22 The LORD answered, ‘Listen to them and give them a king.’
Here is what we know for sure. God is not schizophrenic. He would not tell
one person to vote for Obama and one to vote for McCain. As the scripture
says, a city divided against itself cannot stand, so obviously many people
are not hearing from God.
Maybe I am the one not hearing, but I know God does not change and Obama
contradicts many things I read in scripture so I doubt it.
For all my friends who are voting for Obama, can you really look God in the
face and say; Father based on your word, I am voting for Obama even though I
know he will continue the genocidal practice of partial birth abortion. He
might have to nominate three or four Supreme Court justices, and I am sure
he will be nominating liberal judges who will be making laws that are
against you. I also know he will continue to push for homosexual rights,
even though you destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for this. I know I can look the
other way because of the economy.
I could not see Jesus agreeing with many of Obama’s positions. Finally I
have two questions for all my liberal
friends. Since we know someone’s value system has to be placed on the
nation,
1. Whose value system should be placed on the nation.
2. Who should determine that this is the right value system for the nation?
Blessings,
Huntley Brown
Posted by: JB | October 21, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Thanks for the cut-n-paste spam JB.. please take it somewhere else.
Posted by: patriot | October 21, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Steve: “Paul, you hit the nail on the head. This has little to do with Obama or McCain. This has to do with Powell getting even with republicans.”
Steve, that struck me as a rather coherent response.
Specifically, your use of the word “this” either indicates to me you are confused or you trying to confuse others.
You responded to and quoted from my post about Obama working across the aisle. Specifically, I posted that Lugar refuted the earlier McCain attack that Obama never had worked across the aisle. And then I mentioned that its pretty bad when McCain’s statements are fact checked and countered by those in his own party.
Therefore, I would assume that was what “this” was about.
And you turned it into another railing against Powell.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
If Clarence Thomas were running for President, or Condoleeza Rice, or Alan Keyes does anyone think that 94% of black people would be supporting any of them? Black people aren’t supporting Obama because he is black. They are supporting him because they support him politically him the same way they believed in Bill Clinton, and Al Gore. Also 9-11 is not the reason why this country is in a mess. We are in a mess because of failed neocon policies. Many republicans and independents who really love their country have come to realize that the republic party has evolved into some monster that they do not know or understand. Powell and David Brooks, and Peg Noonan, and George Will, and Chris Buckley, are just a few of the more outspoken republicans who are voicing what many are saying in private.
Posted by: Dee | October 21, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Dee, I wish I could believe what you said but do you really think that 95% of blacks are voting Obama because of his ideas? Come on now — that is a big number.
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Actually 95% of blacks are voting for Obama because 95% of black always vote democratic.
Posted by: d | October 21, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Huntley Brown
thank you for you comment what you said makes alot of sense just to be clear here I’m not the Steve in the blog battle with Paul I’m the Steve who posted the story about my daughter who is white going to a black church with her friend we have always taught our kids to be open to all people no matter what color they are but because my daughter is white she was made to feel like she didn’t belong at the black church she went to with her friend why is this , is it because black people want to turn the table on white people myself and my family have never had anything to do with suppressing the black community but because we are white we are put in the same category as the white people who are racists and I feel that since Obama is black then those same people who judge me for being white are the same ones who will put him in office no matter what the cost meaning they will lie and cheat to make it happen look at Acorn most of the folks working there are black
Posted by: Steve | October 21, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Well Obuma can send in his clown!!
I think the most ‘telling ‘ (foreshadowing ) statement Biden made was , “And he’s gonna need help. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you – not financially to help him – we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.”
This can be summed up to simply state “get ready , America ’cause you’re not going to like what we are getting ready to do to you !”
————————–
THIS REALLY SOUNDS LIKE A WARM UP FOR THE DRAFT!
Posted by: HP Boston | October 21, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
That’s true, blacks do vote democratic. But even if Clarence Thomas were running as a conservative democrat, I do not believe most black people would vote for him. Ideology counts more than race among blacks. By the way Blacks in 2008 would not have wasted their primary vote on Jesse Jackson either had he been running.
Posted by: Dee | October 21, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I love how he pointed to Obama’s rhetoric as a point in his favor…
If I believed every politician who said that they would “break down the walls” , Well, I would be very gullible.
Ooh, how awesome…it’s not red it’s not blue, it’s united, so vote against the evil republicans…give me a break.
Powell has basically decided to become a Democrat, and that’s fine. However, his endorsement was a nice listing of Obama’s talking points, without acknowledging any criticism of Obama’s approach.
Notable was any discussion of substantive solutions to problems.
In addition, Powell did not even touch on Obama’s dreadful decision to oppose the troop increase, which led to a situation in which stability is on the horizon in Iraq.
I respect Powell greatly. He is betting on who he sees as the winner…maybe he is positioning himself for 2012 or 2016? I would probably vote for him. And definitely would vote for him over Obama, even if he became a Democrat. He seems to be the real moderate, while Obama is a boring Mondale-Carter liberal, who aligns himself with groups far to the left of that position…I don’t like him.
Posted by: Wade | October 21, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
“notable was the absence of”
Sorry
Posted by: Wade | October 21, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Come on Dee 95% just look at how many blacks have registered for this election that didn’t vote in the last several, its because he is black and that’s the only reason, even Powell said race has a little to do with it, if he told the truth he would say race has alot to do with it, Acorn has been targeting the black community, last month I was at a store and two people wearing Acorn t-shirts who were also black walked right past me to a group of black people and asked them to register not even paying me any mind at all how do they know that I wasn’t registered
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Come on Dee 95% just look at how many blacks have registered for this election that didn’t vote in the last several, its because he is black and that’s the only reason, even Powell said race has a little to do with it, if he told the truth he would say race has alot to do with it, Acorn has been targeting the black community, last month I was at a store and two people wearing Acorn t-shirts who were also black walked right past me to a group of black people and asked them to register not even paying me any mind at all how do they know that I wasn’t registered
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Wake up people why do you think McCain picked Palin not because she is this great politician but because he is trying to counter the black vote with a female vote
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Dee: “Black people aren’t supporting Obama because he is black. They are supporting him because they support him politically…”
Well, Dee, we don’t have to be like Republicans refusing to acknowledge what we know to likely be true.
The likely truth here is that Obama’s skin color is contributing to some of his African-American support.
How couldn’t it? He’s the first, and especially for older African-Americans the pride from seeing something like that has to be pretty strong.
Ironically, younger African-Americans understand he’s the first but are probably inclined to think, “so what?” Their lack of depth of understanding is the benefit of a generation before that hopes and prayed their children wouldn’t understand what they did.
But for older folks, who in their lifetimes experienced black only drinking fountains, black only motels, black only schools, etc., it must be amazing to see this nation of the verge of electing a black president.
But that pride isn’t the only thing driving these millions of voters. Clinton had the majority of their support before the primaries, and Obama was the same color then he is now. Many of them do vote the issues, and make their discerning choices about which candidate their party ought to nominate.
So, yes its a factor but its not the only factor, and most likely as a political attribute its a diminishing factor with each generation.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
To put this racial question in perspective, does anyone here not think that Kennedy probably got a few additional percentage points of Catholic support in 1960?
And the history of Catholics here in the U.S. is certainly not a dramatic in terms of poor treatment as the history of blacks in the U.S.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Kennedy was put in office by the mob like it or not thats the truth and it was the mob who took him out because he turned on them, in this election it’s Acorn who will put Odama in office with their voter fraud
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
steve – the mob put JFK in office and took him out, huh.
Howard Hunt of Watergate fame recently died, leaving behind tapes for his sons. The content was his desire to set the record straight – to them – regarding the JFK assassination.
Hunt had often been suspected of involvement, which he denied, while also denying he knew anything about it.
On his deathbed confession, he acknowledged it was the CIA, and even laid out the hierarchy of who was involved – the names of agents, etc.
Those tapes were made available to the press, and some stories came out about them. But not many – its the conspiracy everyone knows happened, and most just don’t want to go there.
But not the mob. They had a connection, in that as earlier suspected and more recently indicated by Hunt, the CIA used a couple mob connections to line up a second shooter.
Posted by: Paul | October 21, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
To those who think that Secretary Powell’s endorsement was based on race, I say I believe he said exactly what was on his mind, and I believe he meant every word he said-He doesn’t like the nasty tone the Republican party has taken on, nor its extreme social views. Powell is a traditional country-club Republican libertarian of the Rockefeller – Goldwater Episcopalian ilk, like George Will
s, and he doesn’t like the Know-Nothing Fundamentalist far-right crowd or their hostile, uncivil ways-and neither does George Wills. He also thinks that Palin is a not very bright rookie who would be a disaster if she inherited the White House, and I think all of the evidence shows that he is right about that-another view shared by George Will, who is a self-described conservative of very long standing. Those of us on the far side of 50 remember a civil, responsible, mainstream Republican Party, the party of President Eisenhower, which bore precious little resemblance today’s Republican party, the party of Newt Gingrich, Karl Rove, and Sarah Palin. I frankly think President Eisenhower and Senator Goldwater would despise today’s Republican party.
Posted by: Tim Dunn | October 21, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Steve it’s sad that you are going to let a “racial attack” stop you from voting for who you believe is the best presidential candidate (in this instance Obama). Obama was raised by her WHITE mother and GRANDPARENTS . DO you honestly think he HATES white ppl ?
You CAN’T bother about what racists (white or black) manipulate you. Don’t let fear/hate control you. Just pray about it and make the right choice.
Posted by: Charles | October 21, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Two weeks from today, Americans will be asked to cast their vote for the next president of the United States. There’s no time to wait. Let’s get right to it.
Did you hear what Senator Biden said at a fundraiser on Sunday? He guaranteed that if Barack Obama is elected, we’ll face an international crisis within the first six months of their administration. He told Democrat donors to mark his words – that there were “at least four or five scenarios” that would place our country at risk in an Obama administration. Thanks for the warning, Joe!
He didn’t specify what all those four or five scenarios will be, but for clues, let’s review the Obama foreign policy agenda.
Our opponent wants to sit down with the world’s worst dictators. With no preconditions, he proposes to meet with a regime in Teheran that vows to “wipe Israel off the map.” Let’s call that crisis scenario number one.
Senator Obama has also advocated sending our U.S. military into Pakistan without the approval of the Pakistani government. Invading the sovereign territory of a troubled partner in the war against terrorism. We’ll call that scenario number two.
He opposed the surge strategy that has finally brought victory in Iraq within sight. He’s voted to cut off funding for our troops, leaving our young men and women at grave risk. He wants to pull out, leaving some 25 million Iraqis at the mercy of Iranian-supported Shiite extremists and al Qaeda in Iraq. By his own admission, this could mean our troops would have to go back to Iraq. Crisis scenario number three.
After the Russian army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama’s reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence – the kind of response that would only encourage Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine next. That would be crisis scenario number four.
But I guess the looming crisis that most worries the Obama campaign right now is Joe Biden’s next speaking engagement. Let’s call that crisis scenario number five.
The real problem is that these warnings from Joe Biden are similar to his earlier assessment of Barack Obama. It wasn’t so long ago that he said Barack Obama wasn’t up to the job, and that, quote, “the presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.”
The same Joe Biden said he would be honored to run on the ticket with John McCain because, quote, “the country would be better off.” And here we have some common ground. I want a president who spent 22 years in uniform defending our country. I want a president who isn’t afraid to use the word “victory” when he talks about the wars we are fighting. I want a president who’s ready on Day One. I want a president with the experience and the judgment and the wisdom to meet the next international crisis – or better yet to avoid it. I want John McCain as our commander-in-chief.
Posted by: Joe Six-Term | October 21, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Of course black people are proud to be voting for Obama because he is both black and someone who they feel has their and the country’s best interests at heart.
Smitty, your responses are virtually unintelligible. You are both a low information, and low literacy level voter, and it is my sincere hope that under an Obama administration we will be able to make changes to the education system that will reduce the number of people we turn out with educational challenges. Ignorance is the true enemy and so is a lack, of critical thinking and plain old common sense.
Speaking of common sense, no one in their right mind can honestly say they think Obama is a socialist. Does anyone think that Warren Buffett and Paul Volker, and many of the other high-profile Obama supporters would be supporting him if he were a socialist? It’s a silly argument designed to scare people who don not know any better. Most people can not even give a coherent definition of socialism. Obama’s views are certainly not those of the radical far right, but they are not socialist.
Obama’s associations…The Annebergs, major philanthropists who are staunch republicans and McCain supporters funded an organization on which both Ayers and Obama were members along with the presidents of several colleges and universities in Illinois. If Obama must be condemned as a terrorist, then so should everyone else whose paths have crossed with Ayers in some civic capacity can be considered a terrorist.
Posted by: Dee | October 21, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
first to answer Paul it was the mob ran unions, look at how much time he spent in mob ran Vegas I’m from a long line of union people and the stories the same unions take your dues and spend it putting the people they want in office and back then the unions were ran by the mob so then it was the mob who put him in office and for want Howard Hunt said that was just to clear his name it doesn’t mean it’s true JFK even went to the mob to get at Castro anyone can say anything it doesn’t make it true and throughout history it’s always the guy who’s dieing or dead telling his side of the story why not tell it when your still around to back it up and to Charles what I’m saying is that I’m a Republican
and was planning on voting for Obama because I didn’t like the way my party was going but when you really look at it the Dems are doing the same type of stuff, this election will be decide by race and gender so my vote is wasted ether way, I’m not giving my vote to Obama to go along with all the black votes and I’m not giving my vote to McCain just because he has Palin so it looks like I’m no voting because the tone is the same from both sides
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Dee first you should’nt say someone is virtually unintelligible. low information, and low literacy level voter when you can’t even spell and as far as education goes i’m in education most of my fellow teachers are being told by our union to vote for Obama but most won’t because they feel he will say anything to get elected
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Whether you stupid republicans believe it or not, its time for change and that change is gonna happen soon coz God himself has already blessed Obama to be the next president of the United States of America.
Posted by: Matilda Jones | October 21, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Why is it now that it Obama’s time to be the next president that people have started calling him a socialist? What’s wrong with being loved by his own people? Even the good book says ‘love thy neighbour’ so why the hate?
Go Obama, Go Obama, Go Obama. coz you’ve already won!
Posted by: Mariama Jalloh | October 21, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Obama is my canidate and i like him because of who he is. Even if Obama’s supporters who havent read this book you’re talking about read it now, it wont change anything coz our minds are already made up to vote for Obama.
Posted by: Marvel Williams | October 21, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
What a perfect pair: Obama the leftist illuminati member and corrupt Ted Stevens. Powell picked a great pair to endorse, that’s for sure.
Posted by: Jeff | October 21, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Steve, there is a difference between obvious typos and being educationally challenged. If you are a teacher (and so am I) you understand this very well. In all honesty, don’t you think it is McCain who is saying anything and doing anything just to get elected? McCain really wanted Lieberman. He chose Palin, not because she was best for the country, but because he was persuaded that she was best for the ticket. McCain used to be a reformer–certainly more of one than he is now. But in order to get the good housekeeping seal of approval from the RNC and Bush, he had to reverse himself on a number of things. I do not really even think he believes the stuff he is saying about Obama. He is saying them because he feels he will win more votes.
On the flip, there are a lot of TRUE things, things that can’t be disputed or nuanced that Obama and his surrogates–and the so-called liberal media that gave Bush and company a free ride for 8 years–could be saying that they are too honorable to state. What about McCain’s D rating among Iraq and Afghanistan Veteran groups based on his voting patterns on veteran’s issues? What about the Keating 5 and Gordon Liddy (unrepentant ex-con)? What about the Palins’ ties to the Alaska Independence Party, a group whose founder, Vogler, has said things that make statements by Rev. Wright look like child’s play? What about the fact THAT MANY VIETNAM VETS BELIEVE that McCain sang for his supper while he was in the Hanoi Hilton? What about how many feel about what really happened with the plane crash(es) that killed 130 people? What about the grimey way McCain treated his first wife? Even the Reagans basically broke ties with him for that and why many people (republicans) view Cindy as a home wrecker? What about the fact THAT ALMOST EVERY MEMBER OF THE SENATE HAS A McCain letter where McCain is apologizing for some over-the-top outburst with one of his colleagues? What if one of Obama’s daughters were 17 and pregnant? What would Rush and Dobson, and Tony Perkins be saying then?
On another subject, What about the true meaning of pro-life–a meaning that the Catholic Church and many other Christians embrace that includes all of the threats to human life–war, poverty, disease, homelessness, etc, and not just abortion? Jesus loved the poor and had very disparaging views about those who think money is more important than any thing else. The Christian Right is neither–neither Christian nor right.
Posted by: Dee | October 21, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Hi Mariama
your right he has probably already won but its not about hate its about the double standard in this country when a black church is started or a black club or a black political group its ok because the black people in this country have been saying for years that they don’t have a voice and now they have a black man who is going to be the next president but when you have a white group or white club or church started it becomes racists this is why most white people feel the way they do, white people today didn’t have anything to do with slavery and most aren’t racists so if the black community would start treating people based on the why they are treated which is in the most part they way most of us were raised is to respect all people then maybe you wouldn’t hear the comments like he going to win because he is black I’m a middle aged white man and most of my friends are of color when I hear a black person say they have a right to something because of the way blacks have been treated in the past this makes me angry because I had nothing to do with it, don’t assume that because I’m white I won’t vote for Obama I’m not voting for ether side because of all the stuff being tossed around, what if everyone said we have had enough and didn’t vote at all, then want would Washington do, when my children act out I ignore them and it amazing how fast the straighten up, its hard for me to teach my kids to respect everyone when my daughter goes to a all black church with her friend and is treated like a outsider even her black friend was sadden by this she said she was not going back to that church if they didn’t allow white people to attend she has told me that she feels funny when she is around other blacks because they question why she has white friends this is truly very sad but its also the message that most blacks send
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Hi Mariama
your right he has probably already won but its not about hate its about the double standard in this country when a black church is started or a black club or a black political group its ok because the black people in this country have been saying for years that they don’t have a voice and now they have a black man who is going to be the next president but when you have a white group or white club or church started it becomes racists this is why most white people feel the way they do, white people today didn’t have anything to do with slavery and most aren’t racists so if the black community would start treating people based on the why they are treated which is in the most part they way most of us were raised is to respect all people then maybe you wouldn’t hear the comments like he going to win because he is black I’m a middle aged white man and most of my friends are of color when I hear a black person say they have a right to something because of the way blacks have been treated in the past this makes me angry because I had nothing to do with it, don’t assume that because I’m white I won’t vote for Obama I’m not voting for ether side because of all the stuff being tossed around, what if everyone said we have had enough and didn’t vote at all, then want would Washington do, when my children act out I ignore them and it amazing how fast the straighten up, its hard for me to teach my kids to respect everyone when my daughter goes to a all black church with her friend and is treated like a outsider even her black friend was sadden by this she said she was not going back to that church if they didn’t allow white people to attend she has told me that she feels funny when she is around other blacks because they question why she has white friends this is truly very sad but it also the message that most blacks send
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
to be honest here I don’t really view Obama as black he had a white mother and a black father so really he is of mixed race just like most of us but its funny how fast blacks will say he is black even Obama has said he is proud to be a black American does this mean he doesn’t want to acknowledge his white heritage
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
DEE: maybe you should read what I wrote before you responed I said I wasnt voting because both side are throwing around trash you make it sound like I all for McMain both sides have had things in their past that we should look at no one is perfect but Im not going to vote with all the pepole voting for McCAIN because of Palin and I not voting with all the blacks for Obama read what I said about McCain picking Palin to counter the black vote get with the program or get off the blog
Posted by: steve | October 21, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Figures. No surprise whatsoever. Birds of a feather.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
You can argue until the cows come home between McCain and Obama. Truth is, Obama is a fraud. McCain might not be great, but Obama is a complete fraud. Visiting his mother is a political move. Just like McCain’s was said to be when he went to Washington when the bailout issue was first announced.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Steve,
You are right about most of your recent comment. In this country, if you have any black blood that becomes known, historically you have been treated as black even if you look white. This is referred to as the “one-drop rule”. If you recall, this is what the Supreme Court decision, Plessey vs. Ferguson (1896) was all about. Now if you are biracial and, phenotypically, you look black, you are definitely going to be seen as black whether you want to or not. Obama’s biraciality is a plus. He is able to see many different points of view that perhaps black Americans with more remote white ancestry and white Americans with more remote black ancestry can not see.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
excuse me i meant to say “grandmother” – yeah, also the one he called racist in his book. Whatever. The guy is a joke.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
** You can argue until the cows come home between McCain and Obama. Truth is, Obama is a fraud. **
That is laughable.. It is McCain who is putting McCain first, not Country.
Posted by: mark | October 21, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
dee: “He is able to see many different points of view that perhaps black Americans with more remote white ancestry and white Americans with more remote black ancestry can not see.”
Yes, that must be why listened to a racist minister for 20 yrs so that he could see andl learn about the many different points of view.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
It is incredible that anyone would vote for McCain and allow our country to go down the tubes. His tax proposal is worse than what we have under bush. His health plan will mean more americans without insurance. His economic policy has been criticized by everyone from Greenspan to the Wall Street Journal. The problem is most are not voting for McCain, simply against Obama, which is about stupid as it gets.
Posted by: Janice | October 21, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
mark: **Obama is a fraud. **
“That is laughable.. It is McCain who is putting McCain first, not Country.”
Oh okay. Obama is still a fraud no matter what McCain is, does, stands for.It doesn’t change Obama’s strategies.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
It is incredible that anyone would vote for Obama and allow our country to go down the tubes. His tax proposal is worse than what we have under bush. His health plan will mean more americans with insurance but no jobs b/c employers can’t afford his idiotic notion that employers should pay for their employees personal health care. His economic policy has been criticized by everyone from Greenspan to the Wall Street Journal as well. The problem is most are not voting for Obama, simply against McCain, which is about stupid as it gets.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
msa,
You last comment was not exactly original. What do you think would have happened if social security had been privatized during the bush years? What is wrong with giving the overwhelming majority of people(95%) a tax cut? Even Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and many other wealthy people feel they can do with out additional tax cuts and still be very rich and still have money to invest in the economy. If the trickle down theory had worked, then the bush tax cuts for the rich would not have created so many deficits and a crash of our economic system.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Steve, So in reverse:
“In this country, if you have any white blood that becomes known, historically you have been treated as white even if you look black. Now if you are biracial and, phenotypically, you look white, you are definitely going to be seen as white whether you want to or not. Obama’s biraciality is a plus. He is able to see many different points of view that perhaps white Americans with more remote black ancestry and black Americans with more remote white ancestry can not see.”
That is about how much sense that argument makes. That is your view, not a valid argument.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
dee: “What do you think would have happened if social security had been privatized during the bush years?” How is that an argument? It was never tried.
“What is wrong with giving the overwhelming majority of people(95%) a tax cut?” Because if I work my butt off to build a company, I don’t think it’s right to take from me to give to you. I would rather give to my employees and through charity and other programs… not have it forcefully taken from me. I earned it. I went the extra mile, had the brains, invented it, took the risk, whatever. It’s just not right.
“Even Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and many other wealthy people feel they can do with out additional tax cuts and still be very rich and still have money to invest in the economy.” Well DUH. I’m sure they make a tad more than 250k AGI
“If the trickle down theory had worked, then the bush tax cuts for the rich would not have created so many deficits and a crash of our economic system.”
Do you really think the really rich are ever going to share their wealth. That is a joke. It has not been that way since the beginning of time. As usual, it’s hitting the upper middle class. Same ol, same ol
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
AND Obama needs to put his money where his mouth his. Check out his charity and donations as a percentage of his AGI. It’s a joke. Just like he is.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Truth: The “powers that be” are shoving Obama at us to keep us quiet and so we can feel warm and fuzzy inside while the CEOs making off with millions get bailed out… but we’re off busy looking “hope and change”. What a scam it all is. And I’m not for McCain. This election, it is all as clear as can be.
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
msa Your attempts to make a point by reversing others’ points is not working.
Obama sees himself as black because he realizes that is how the world sees him. It took him a while to reconcile this reality. A lot of biracial people go through the same thing. I know because I know a lot of biracial people. This does not mean he rejects his white ancestry or loves his white family members any less. In fact, he probably loves them more simply because he was raised by them.
Also know one is talking about taking from you to give to anyone else. We have a progressive tax system. The more money you make, the higher your tax rate. During the Bush years, people at the upper end got a break, but in the final analysis, this did not help the country as a whole. All Obama wants to do is reverse the tax cuts for the wealthy back to levels they were at during the Clinton years when there was widespread prosperity and no deficit spending, but a surplus at the end of 2000, instead. Obama is not talking about increasing the tax rates beyond what they were during the Clinton years. This time since the spending of the middle class fuels the economy, the middle class needs a tax break. Middle class people will get far less from their tax breaks than wealthy people do, but something is better than nothing.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
msa, Thank God, given what has happened in our financial markets recently that social security was not privatized. That subject is dead. Good riddance.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Whenever I start reading a comment that purposely distorts Obama’s name I immediately skip the rest of it. That fact alone renders the person making the comment a complete idiot.
So to those that do that. This type of childish idiocy might be popular on wingnut blogs where you hang out all day with other retards, but no one will take any of your comments seriously anywhere outside the right wing bubble.
If you want to be taken seriously at all please spell Obama’s name correctly. Otherwise you’re simply reflecting upon your IQ being equal to that of my left shoe.
Posted by: ranndino | October 21, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
You Obama fans live in a “pie in the sky” world. The rich and powerful will always reign. Might as well get used to it. You are truly chasing a dream and a cloud. Go for it. LOL
Posted by: msa123 | October 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
msa, Thank God, given what has happened in our financial markets recently that social security was not privatized. That subject is dead. Good riddance.
BTW in my ptrevious comment I meant “no one” not “know one”.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
msa, Thank God, given what has happened in our financial markets recently that social security was not privatized. That subject is dead. Good riddance.
BTW in my previous comment I meant “no one” not “know one”.
Posted by: dee | October 21, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Powell is the ultimate good soldier.
He’s just had enough of the GOP too.
Posted by: kravitz | October 21, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
What does all of this fighting accomplish? Why not just vote for who you want and let it be at that? I hear some terrible things said about Christians but does anyone realize what it means to be a christian? If you would really like to know read the King James Bible – Matthew, Mark , Luke and John. I was never happy until I gave my life to Jesus, I never did anything right until I made him my priority. I know who I am going to vote for but my vote will not be cast because of the economy because my lord keeps me. I will cast my vote on moral issues, not my wallet.
Posted by: tr | October 22, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Janice: I totally agree with you, and you are correct, our great nation was founded on Christian-Judeo principles.
Colin Powell, Oprah, and more than 90% African-Americans endorsed Barack Obama specifically for one reason, not because he’s the most qualified and experienced, but that’s their choice.
As for the gentleman who stated “Once a Muslim, always a Muslim”, it is so true just like once a Catholic, always a Catholic. Barack Obama is no Christian, maybe in name for political convenience, but not a practicing Christian. Barack Obama’s mother was an Atheist, his father was Muslim, and his stepfather introduced him to Islam. Anyone who believes in Christ does not support abortion, same-sex marriage, and does not associate with criminals, terrorists, and freaky racist pastors and priests, and does not marry an America-hating angry and racist woman. Why has Barack Obama associated himself with so many America-hating and radical people? Because Barack Obama identifies himself with those associations who want to overthrow our government. Barack Obama shares the same values and principles as his radical and America-hating associations. That’s the change, hope and unity that is coming if Barack Obama is elected! May God bless us and be with us always.
Posted by: Diana in California | October 22, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
Are some of you losing your minds? Powell didn’t make the Republicans….the Republicans made him. Reagan made him a four star general. Bush I made him chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. Bush II made him Secretary of State. He would be nothing if not for them. Nice kick in the pants. And, as for him saying that the republican party is getting narrower…that is ridiculous. It is an inclusive party with a tremendous diversity of opinion. The libs just like to paint an incorrect portrait of the party. And the media just help them along with that. Good job, ABC.
McCain Palin 08
Posted by: Dan Petre | October 22, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
I’m watching fox news right now and they were talking about the how the media has jumped on the Obama band wagon do any of you think the media is pushing for Obama, this is the problem with the way the media in this country is out of control, they can make or break anyone, because all the people that really dont know the true facts belive everything they say, WAKE UP AMERICA. when he does win Obama and the whole Dem party will fall on their faces and thats when the media will come out and say it was Bush and the Rep to blame
Posted by: steve | October 22, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
look how the media acted when clinton was having sex in the oval office they went after the people that were investgating it not Clinton we have had people from both side do things like this but when its a Rep the media is all over them but not when its a Dem they might report it but not like they do when its a Dem involed
Posted by: steve | October 22, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Smitty,
take your own advice-THINK FOR YOURSELF. Your first line is once a muslim always a muslim, right? Then where would Rev Wright come into play (a christian) if Obama was Muslim? You are displaying your ignorance with this one. And furthermore, I agree with Powell. If you’re an American, you should be able to aspire to be anything you want to be, including President, and not be based on your race or ethnicity.
Posted by: justthefactsplease | October 22, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Diane in California.
Obama doesn’t personally believe in abortion and all those other things you list. He doesn’t believe the GOVERNMENT should have control over our choices. Your so-called Christian beliefs and faith are between you and your Creator. Read I Tim. 2:5–There is one mediator between men and God….and it’s not the President of the US or any other person. We all will have to answer for the deeds done in these bodies.. so enlighten yourself and speak the truth.
Posted by: justthefactsplease | October 22, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Jenice, you look ignorant. America was not founded on a religious value. check this out:
Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists
The Final Letter, as Sent
To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.
Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.
Posted by: geo | October 23, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
I’m a little surprised a person of substance and intellect would endorse someone with neither. Hussein Obama is an empty suite controlled by the communists of this country.
Posted by: Realist66 | October 24, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
All you idiots saying that America was not founded on Christianity….you’re ALL uninformed and its bizarre to me that you’d think prior history is irrelevant in the forming of our country. Our Constitution and Declaration of Independence may have taken place in the 18th century….but it all started WAY before that. Did you forget about the Mayflower? The pilgrims? Ya know…those folks that floated over from the Netherlands and England to escape the persecution of protestants?! YES THEY WERE CHRISTIANS!!! THESE are our first American ancestors….and they were CHRISTIANS.
Get educated and quit compromising your spiritual duties by denying the actual facts to suit your own selfish needs to be “free”….in speech, abortion, sociality, or whatever issue you choose to side against God with. No im not some whacko right winger going wild. Im not gullible. Im college educated…with an emphasis in history…and I have SEEN THIS SITUATION BEFORE!!! Anyone who ignores the severity of whats at stake here should have their rights revoked. End of story.
Blaming one administration, one party, whatever….thats rediculous…and you need your head examined! Our country is suffering now. Our world is suffering as well. That being said…Obama is the most unqualified candidate Ive ever had the priviledge of NOT voting for!!! His party’s strategies seem like a win-win for everyone…but the fact is that the people have an agenda! And lets be clear…it wont work out as nicely as they’ve been telling everyone. Its simply impossible…without a MAJOR step towards that dreaded “S” word. I hate to be the one to say it …. but it is in fact socialism. People equate Bush’s bailout of banks, etc as socialism…but from the beginning its been clear that its a temporary solution to ease our suffering here…and by NO means a permanent establishment. Obama however has plans that do amount to fundamental socialism…but the difference is that his plans are not meant to jump start the economy back on track. His plans are long term. They will be instituted as part of our government…not a passing experimental stage. This is NOT ok. At the point of breakdown…our country will be forced to grovel to everyone else and we will no longer be a productive capitalist country known GLOBALLY as the destination for success. Its sad really.
This is off topic too…but…Im sceptical of Obama & Pelosi’s reluctant agreement of domestic drilling too! Whether we like it or not…US based oil companies do hold a HUGE stake in our nations economic stability & fortune. Where I live in Houston for instance, hundreds of thousands are employed by these companies!!! Whether they be roughnecks, or quality inspectors, or accountants, or engineers, or geologists, or scientists, or drill makers….the facets are too many to name…but dang!! Thats ALOT of people to lose jobs from the shutdown of an essential commodity!! Workers here are scared. What happens when our home-grown industry is forced to fire people?? MELTDOWN….
Posted by: Lauren | October 27, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The Barack Obama Campaign has so far refused to release Senator Obama’s birth certificate. This refusal has struck a lot of observers of the political scene as rather odd. Unlike tax or medical records, a birth certificate should not have anything embarrassing.
Speculation, naturally, is somewhat rife.
National Review political analyst Jim Geraghty suggests a number of unlikely reasons:
One would be that Barack Obama was not born in the United States, but in Kenya, his father’s country of birth. This scenario is very unlikely as it would require all of Obama’s family and friends to lie consistently about the circumstances of Obama’s birth. However, if true, it could mean that Obama is not a natural born American citizen and is therefore ineligible for election to the Presidency.
The scenario of Obama being born in a foreign country reminds one of the kerfuffle that occurred when some suggested that John McCain was not a real native born citizen for having been born in the then Panama Canal Zone, The media huffing and puffing became such a distraction that the US Senate had to vote to confirm Senator McCain’s citizenship just to quite it.
The other scenario Geraghty comes up with is some kind of embarrassing name change. Say Obama’s middle name was changed from Mohammed to Hussein or his first name from Barry to Barack. The problem is that in the first instance the new middle name would be no more or less unsettling than the old one and in the second instance it is a non issue. Gary Hart, who ran for President in 1984 and 1988, had changed his name from Hartpence to Hart. It was the subject of some humor, but did not affect his runs for the Presidency.
Wilder speculation will no doubt ensue, at least until the birth certificate is released. Maybe the people that Obama claims as his parents are not listed as his parents on the document? Unlikely again, but who knows?
Promote this content by clicking on the bookmark icons below.
Facebook
LinkedIn
Yahoo My Web
StumbleUpon
Buzz
Myspace
Digg
Technorati
Netscape
Twitter
Del.icio.us
Slashdot
Reddit
More Bookmarks »
Save For Laterclose window
Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate
Type in your e-mail address below to receive an automated reminder to come back and read this piece of content. Your e-mail address will not be used for anything other than the automated reminder.
Your email address:
Share Save For Later Publish Yours Print
Page: 1 2 Next »
Posted by: Buck | October 27, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
P.S. Poll data shows that when voters find out Obama supports giving illegal aliens driver’s licenses, Social Security, Medicaid, college tuition and other benefits, they turn against him. Let’s get our message out. Help Us Today — Go Here Now. We need your help, please Donate Here Now or call our special toll free donation line at 1-866-957-1467.
Paid for by The National Republican Trust PAC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
2100 M St. NW Suite 170-340 Washington, DC 20037-1233
Contributions to The National Republican Trust PAC are
not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income
tax purposes. No corporate funds are accepted.
Posted by: Buck | October 27, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Wow!
As I read through these comments, I just can’t believe some of the things that are being said, especially for those of you who are throwing around God, Christ, Jesus or whatever religion you believe in like you really truly believe in it.
All Christians, including Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant Christians, believe Jesus was both God and man.
Christian teaching is that the death and resurrection of Jesus are the signs of his power to forgive the sins of any person who turns to him and truly asks for forgiveness. The Bible says that sinners who are forgiven should try to live a new life and NOT go back to their sinful behaviour. Christians believe that knowing about God’s love helps people to live a new and better life.
All of you who so call yourself Christains whether you go to church, carry around the cross or have pictures of Jesus on a cross in your home – do you really know what you are believing in? The cross is important because Jesus died as a sacrifice for the sins of believers. It represents God’s love for humanity.
Now, I don’t care what religion people choose to govern their lives, whether it’s Christianity, Islam, Hinduism or Buddhism etc…..it ALL boils down to ONE COMMON thing….you practice religion because you believe in goodness. What is so discerning is those of you who practice religion, pray to your God or whatever and THEN you turn around judging other people because of their race, religion or even their social behaviors. Who are you to judge anyone?
Obama is NOT a Muslim, he is a Christian—get that straight! And, what if he or anyone else is Muslim, there is nothing wrong with that. Don’t lump the behaviors of one person or a small group of crazy terrorists to one race. Whether you vote for OR don’t vote for Obama, do it because you agree or don’t disagree with his political ideology, not because of the color of his skin. He is a man running for President.
My husband and I believe that McCain lost our confidence when he picked Sarah Palin as VP. He risked the well-being of this country for his own selfish quest to become President, just like he has been trying to do so since 2000. Palin is a heartbeat away from being President and the only reason she was picked because he thinks that she could attract women voters and those upset by Hilary’s lost. Shame on him to put his interest first rather than ‘Country First’….there are so many qualified VP picks out there, but he had to chose Palin so he can win an election. This is the beginning of his poor judgement and one that has clearly dictates even the way he has been running his campaign….one that is divisible and the policies that are so out of touch of this modern era (nothing different from those of BUSH). Even Republicans are denouncing it and crossing party lines to back Obama.
Yes, my husband and I fall under Obama’s tax so we will be TAXED and we don’t believe that it’s socialism. Please…this country has always been about capitalism and no one man, not even any one President can ever turn it into a socialistic one, that’s why we have 2 term limits. This country has been divided economically and socially under Bush’s administration and he has forgotten about the middle class by helping his RICH elite friends and the RICH CEOs and the lobbyists. This economic crisis is the testament of his presidency and it brought to light how the middle class has suffered because of his policies or lack thereof. The tsunami of his presidency has come crashing down leaving wreckage and trampled the hopes of many American dreams…they lost their homes and savings because he refused to regulate these big corporations who are gauging people out of their hard earn money.
We need a new President with new ideas and new policies. McCain’s ideas and policies will be just like that of Bush’s and we will be exactly like we are for the last eight years.
We are Republicans now voting for Barack Obama!!
Posted by: God | October 27, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
You must be color blind to see the truth.
The Civil Rights act was passed in 1964.
Posted by: Full Truth | October 27, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
It all comes down to what Billy Graham says in his prayer for our country. You Obamaites better wise up! If socialism/communism is so great why do so many people want to ESCAPE from Cuba/China/Russia and the like. They call it “escape” because you’re not free to leave, live, feel, speak without governmental control. Do you even know how many evening dinners Obama AND his wife spent w/ a known socialist in CA, all the while Obama toasting to the man’s character?! Yes this race has been racist from the start but I would vote for polka dotted Christian before I’d vote for pro-socialist like Obama. Do any of you remember the warning about Sleeper Cells after 9/11? No?, well let me introduce you to Barack Obama.
Billy Graham’s Prayer For Our Nation
‘Heavenly Father, we come before you today to ask your forgiveness and to seek your direction and guidance. We know Your Word says, ‘Woe to those who call evil good,’ but that is exactly what we have done. We have lost our spiritual equilibrium and reversed our values. We have exploited the poor and called it the lottery. We have rewarded laziness and called it welfare. We have killed our unborn and called it choice. We have shot abortionists and called it justifiable. We have neglected to discipline our children and called it building self esteem. We have abused power and called it politics. We have coveted our neighbor’s possessions and called it ambition. We have polluted the air with profanity and pornography and called it freedom of expression. We have ridiculed the time-honored values of our forefathers and called it enlightenment. Search us, Oh God, and know our hearts today; cleanse us from every sin and Set us free. Amen!’
Commentator Paul Harvey aired this prayer on his radio program, ‘The Rest of the Story,’ and received a larger response to this program than any other he has ever aired. With the Lord’s help, may this prayer sweep over our nation and wholeheartedly become our desire so that we again can be called ‘One nation under God.’
Think about this: If you forward this prayer to everyone on your e-mail list, in less than 30 days it would be heard by the world. (It’s worth a try!) One Nation Under God.
Posted by: arealjem | October 29, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
See: it nearly convinced me.
Posted by: Paul | Oct 21, 2008 11:14:23 AM
I have voted from the floor of a Democratic National Convention, shaken hands with Jimmy Carter IN the White house, and have an aunt that was a Democratic National Committee member a number of times. I have now also contributed hundreds of dollars and many hours to the Palin/…er…McCain/Palin ticket. It’s all about who will do the least overall harm in four years. We need a divided Judicial/Legislative/Executive government for the country to function properly. Oh, and regardless of your politics, Nancy Pelosie(y) is just disgusting.
Posted by: ibstubro | October 29, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Perhaps now would be a good time for all of those labeling Obama a socialist to head over to their book cases, dust off the dictionary and look up the meaning of socialism. Then, time permitting read a few history books on what real socialism means historically. Nazi Germany was a socialist country. If you think the USA is headed in that direction, perhaps now would be a good time to pack you bags and leave, while you still can. For one to equate Obama with a socialist, displays a lack of truth and understanding as to the true meaning of the word socialism. Seek the truth and the truth shall set you free. You must be color blind to see the truth. Now is the time for unity, not division, for cooperation, not competition. Great leaders take people where they need to be, not where they want to go. As Ghandi said, “An eye or an eye will make the whole world blind”.
Posted by: Full Truth | October 29, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm