Power Goes Out During Obama Rally in Reno
Kind of an awkward moment just now at an Obama rally at William Peccole Park in Reno, Nevada.
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was midway through his stump speech before a crowd of roughly 11,000 Nevadans when suddenly the generator died and all power went out.
"We need policies that grow our economy –" Obama said, and then the microphone and sound system went quiet, and the crowd could no longer hear him.
The crowd chanted supportively — "Oh-Bah-Mah! Oh-Bah-Ma!" and "Fix The Mike! Fix The Mike! — while Obama asked aides just what was going on.
Told it would take five minutes to reboot the generator, Obama yelled to the crowd that the power would be back on momentarily.
He went down to talk to some people in the crowd, shake hands, and get a hug or two.
Then he was beckoned back on stage.
"Hello hello hello," he said into the mike, testing it.
It worked.
"I told you folks were having trouble making their electricity bills!" he joked.
"Either that or somebody from the McCain campaign kicked our plug out of the socket," he joked, laughing. "That was just a joke guys, there’s no evidence of foul play.
"Now, where was I?" he asked, looking at the teleprompter that he has relied upon for months.
"Here’s where I was: ‘We need policies that grow our economy from the bottom-up," he said, re-launching into the speech.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Hey Tapper,
Could you try some actual reporting on the Obama campaign, say perhaps the Barbara West interview of Biden in which he contradicts Obama on “spreading the wealth” (Biden says Dems will not, Obama said he stands by his comment on the same day, 23rd) and Biden’s laughable claim that the Obama campaign hasnt given a penny to ACORN? the 800K is absolutely unimpeachable fact, and Biden is getting a pass.
Please, ABC, do your job.
Several Biden moments bear repeating all over the web ad nauseaum.
1. “Is that a Joke” – Biden’s response to the “spreading the wealth” comparison to Karl Marx “To each according to need, from each according to ability” Biden also says that they’re not “spreading the wealth” – Even as Obama doubled down on it the next day (Biden was 23rd, OBama saying he meant to say spread the wealth 24th)
2. “Never a penny to ACORN” from campaign – Clearly a lie by Biden, see 800K.
3. “I don’t know who’s writing your questions” – Biden’s response to the question re “international crisis” coming if Barack elected. Biden went into the Obama spin of “all presidents are tested”. Total fantasy compared to his twice delievered fundraising speech
Posted by: JG | October 25, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Good job Obama!!!
Posted by: Sandy | October 25, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
He does have a great sense of humor haha go obama!
Posted by: Angie | October 25, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Give it up JG……don’t you have NEW smears to run with?
President Barack Obama…has a great ring to it!!!
Posted by: Lynne | October 25, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I am still wondering if people really think 250,000 a year is middle income. I would consider it well off income. What is considered poor??
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Thanks for the moment of levity, Jake.
Posted by: MO_1193 | October 25, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I sure hope that teleprompter is preprogrammed by someone with “experience” and working for the 3:00am call.
Posted by: HH | October 25, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Prove they paid ACORN. Not possible, cuz they didn’t.
On the other hand, $180K went to Doll Up Caribou Barbie instead of into much needed campaign ads in battleground states.
Clever strategy.
McCain = Fail
Posted by: JG_is_goofy | October 25, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
No joke, Obama.
Typical when anything goes “wrong”; blame it on the McCain campaign.
It’s just not funny.
Obama’s persona is flat when it comes to humor. Simple as that.
Just read of the teleprompter; that’s Obama’s speed.
It’s sad. Even at the Alfred Smith dinner, Obama fell flat on the jokes. McCain outshined him 10 to 1.
Posted by: NielPA | October 25, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
How many people do you think make 250,000 or more a year??
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
800,000 dollars to ACORN.
. . and democrats went after the republicans in 2000 and 2004???
They are no better than the republicans fixing elections.
Independents for McCain
Posted by: NielPA | October 25, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The New York Times reported recently that the average family in America with an income of $10 million or more received a half-million-dollar tax cut, while the middle class got crumbs (less than $100 shaved off their tax bill). If we examine the taxes paid in a static world—that is, if we assume that there was no change in behavior and economic performance as a result of the tax code—then these numbers are meaningful. Most of the tax cuts went to the super wealthy.
But Americans did respond to the tax cuts. There was more investment, more hiring by businesses, and a stronger stock market. When we compare the taxes paid under the old system with those paid after the Bush tax cuts, the rich are now actually paying a higher proportion of income taxes. The latest IRS data show an increase of more than $100 billion in tax payments from the wealthy by 2005 alone. The number of tax filers who claimed taxable income of more than $1 million increased from approximately 180,000 in 2003 to over 300,000 in 2005. The total taxes paid by these millionaire households rose by about 80 percent in two years, from $132 billion to $236 billion.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
They’ve fallen. In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I am still wondering if people really think 250,000 a year is middle income. I would consider it well off income. What is considered poor??
__________________________________________________
Excellent question. The answer determines where you live. $250,000 in San Francisco and other major cities will not take you near as far as $250,000 in Montgomery, Alabama.
Posted by: Paige | October 25, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Paige,
What would you consider poor income then as an average?
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
No joke, Obama.
Typical when anything goes “wrong”; blame it on the McCain campaign.
It’s just not funny.
Obama’s persona is flat when it comes to humor. Simple as that.
Just read of the teleprompter; that’s Obama’s speed.
It’s sad. Even at the Alfred Smith dinner, Obama fell flat on the jokes. McCain outshined him 10 to 1.
Posted by: NielPA | Oct 25, 2008 2:19:28 PM
**********************************
You said it perfectly … that’s why I think McCain should run for the President of “Comedy Central”! He has no business being the POTUS!
Posted by: ENOUGH! | October 25, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
A Veteran – That is a tough question as I believe the answer varies state to state based on cost of living, available healthcare, etc.
I am blessed to live in an upper-middle class neighborhood – if I took my home and put it in Boston, it would be 1.2 million dollars MORE.
I do believe there are countless individuals and families that fall into the “working poor” category. They work more than one job making minimum wage or just a bit more and struggle to pay their bills.
What do you think?
Posted by: Paige | October 25, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
@JG- 1-Do you get an earned income credit on your income tax? Do you think the earned income tax credit is socialistic? It is a part of the tax code and has been for years.
Did you even watch either of the original transcripts of the Obama/Joe interaction or the Biden speech that the two different soundbites were cherry picked from. I guess not because the context in which they were said was completely removed creating attack soundbites. Biden said that Obama has a spine of steel regarding his comment in that speech and Obama said if we grow our economy from the ground up that the wealth would spread around and give more money to spend for services to small businesses. If you choose to make soundbites your basis for opinions you do not see the whole issue.
Posted by: MyVoiceHere | October 25, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Enough
It takes more than “words” to become president. It takes judgement, experience and yes, humor. Obama lacks in all three of these categories.
Independents for McCain
Posted by: NielPA | October 25, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Paige I agree. I live in upstate NY which as you know is a blue state. I am close to 60 and am disabled. Our total household income is just below 50,000. We own our modest home have a 2007 van and a 10 year old pickup. If we were to sell our home for 100,000 which would be a good price and moved almost anywhere else the same home would be 250,000 plus. It makes it difficult to know how a tax cut should be given out. Cost of livings are more in one area tan another, wages for the same work are much different from one area to another. I just feel with the top 25% of the population already accounting for 85% of the income tax revenue that spending control is needed more. I agree with McCain to put a spending freeze, assess and eliminate unnecessary programs, make government more efficent. I heard Biden proclaim in the vice pres. debate that “we are committed to doubling foreign aid but may have to postpone that for a bit” I would rather have McCain’s approach to cut foreign aid, especially to countrties that really don’t like us much. What is your view??
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I still believe George Carlin said it best. Too many people buying stuff they don’t need with money they don’t have.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“Typical when anything goes “wrong”; blame it on the McCain campaign.”
why not, they’re usually the ones that have caused the problem, just like the republicans have caused the problems our country now faces.
Posted by: JR | October 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
What a loser! I guess he would forget where he was considering he has to read his thoughts since he has no original ones…I loved the 3am comment. Here is how it would go.
“Ring, Ring..
(Obama) Hello..
(Caller) Mr. Prez, Russia just invaded Kazakstan and the webble wobbles are getting clobered.
(Obama)Hang on a minute while I get my remote and turn on my teleprompter for a response. (Click)
teleprompter on: What we don’t need is 8 more years of Bush-McCain policies
(Caller) Mr. Prez…what the hell was that?
(Obama) Sorry, wrong channel, I’ll have to call you back.” And Obama would go back to sleep!
Posted by: sentori | October 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
“It takes more than “words” to become president. It takes judgement,”
Is that the “judgment displayed by McCain picking Palin as VP and possibly the next president?
Posted by: JR | October 25, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
You mean he couldn’t just wave his hand and make the electricity come back on? I thought the messiah could do anything, seriously though folks just a joke.
Posted by: samhiguchi | October 25, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
why not, they’re usually the ones that have caused the problem, just like the republicans have caused the problems our country now faces.
It is amazing that you feel all the problems everywhere are caused by the party with the fewest members. The last democrat in the white house was impeached and couldn’t have possibly help to cause the problem. You need to check the facts on deregulating the mortgage industry. You need to check what Clinton had to say in Feb. 2000 about Iraq. Bottom line is we can take your criticizm because we know it comes from the uninformed on the facts, or non-believers of the facts. Your choice.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Any one of you who cries about socialism is a hypocrite. Did you cash those stimulus checks? You sure did.
Posted by: Jwench | October 25, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
JOHN MCCAIN vs JOHN MCCAIN!
John McCain (2001) said “”I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief.”
Now barack Obama wants the top 2% of earners to go back the tax rate that John McCain VOTED TO KEEP.
But what is MOST striking about the debate over taxes is that Obama wants to return the top tax rate to the pre-Bush level and use that money to HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS.
Were the Clinton era taxes so bad? the economy added mongo jobs and inflation was low.
Were the Bush years better? Maybe for Joe the Hedge-fund Manager! Middle class wages, adjusted for inflation, FELL during the Bush years!
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
A Veteran – My apologies that I am going to have to cut our posting short. I hope to continue this another time. I have to get son’s football game.
I am sorry to hear you are disabled and your post name is “a veteran”. If you are a vet, thank you for your service.
I strongly encourage you to research the idea of the “spending freeze”. It sounds good in theory, but when programs are unable to adjust for the cost of inflation – it means cuts. McCain’s original spending freeze proposal was across the board which would impact Veteran’s benefits and healthcare. It also impacts monies to Scientist for Breast Cancer Research, other types of medical research, our National Parks, etc.
I agree with Obama you have to take a scalpel to the budget and eliminate programs that no longer work and shore up those that do. A “spending freeze” is rash and can hurt a lot of people in the end.
I read more so I did not hear what Biden said. I do know that Obama has consistently spoken out against the amount of money we are giving Pakistan and receiving nothing in return. We also are paying $10 Billion dollars a month in Iraq while that country is sitting on a massive surplus. Obama has stated the Iraqis will need to step up as that $10 Billion needs to be spent here at home.
Best of Luck to you. Have a great day!
Posted by: Paige | October 25, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
JR
Obviously you have no idea about Palin except what CNN spews. Maybe you should take time out and LISTEN to her. The media sure made a fine job into making Palin a insignificant candidate; and as usual most people fall for the media’s talking heads.
Obama’s judgement on Ayers, Wright, Renzko, etc. outweighs anything the media or Obama fans would throw at Palin.
Independents for McCain
Posted by: NielPA | October 25, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Paige,
Hope to see you here again and you have a great day also. Yes I am a Navy veteran.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Neil,
I agree…they have demonized her to the point where people no longer look at Obama’s lack of experience and judgement. I love the way the elitists have attacked middle class families during this campaign, but yet say “we’re fighting for you.” What a bunch of bs!
Posted by: Sentori | October 25, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“The media sure made a fine job into making Palin a insignificant candidate.”
US should offer lessons and degrees on ”how to hate intelligent, hardworking women”. I am sure there will be no International students. No nation can go so low as the US when it comes to its MSM reporters.
Posted by: JKan | October 25, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Power went out on that lying slimeball a long time ago. He’s nothing but a shadow of a man with nothing inside by a VERY LARGE EGO.
Posted by: Rocky | October 25, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
NielPA,
I have listened to Sarah Palin. The woman is SO IGNORANT that she doesn’t even know what ‘socialism’ is.
Here is a mainstream definition:
“Socialism: An economic system in which the basic means of production are primarily owned and controlled collectively, usually by government under some system of central planning.”
Note that raising the top tax rate from 36% to 39% is not socialism.
And here is a question that Sarah Palin WILL NEVER EVER ANSWER:
“Do you believe that Social Security is socialism and do you propose eliminating this program?”
AND HERE is another question for Sarah “dim-wit” Palin:
“Would you support eliminating the progressive tax and replace it with a flat tax even if it means raising the tax rate on the middle class?”
* * * * * *
The lady is so ignorant of the basic institutions and policies that she is commenting on that, should she become president, she would have to go to a 5th grade textbook on government to start to catch up!
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Oduma’s advisers have come full circle.
They spread so many lies, made so many contradictions that now they are starting to contradict themselves. Of course, Oduma hasn’t got a clue; he could be saying the wrong thing for days before a light went on inside his vacant attic.
Posted by: JANICE | October 25, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
“Here’s where I was: ‘We need policies that grow our economy from the bottom-up,”
Where does one get the “seed money” to “grow” the economy from the bottom up?
You won’t find it at the bottom!
GROW UP, B O!
Posted by: hmmmmm | October 25, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Janice,
For example, Obama could say the economy is strong then contradict himself two hours later!
Most people who read a newspaper knew of the mortgage crisis and the potential damage to the credit market in February. Barack Obama mentioned it in speeches.
But not John McCain, he gave a standard Republican speech on economics this July where he said the danger to the market was regulation!
McCain, like Bush thinks that regulators should sleep on the job, after all, the MARKET CAN REGULATE ITSELF, right??
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
John McCain’s conscience
Define middle income levels
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I SAY, RETURN THE TAX RATES to where they were in the Clinton Administration!
The Clinton record:
o High job growth. Check.
o Low interest rates. Check.
o Didn’t allow terrorists to blow up the world trade center. Check.
o Balanced budget. Check and check.
o No fool wondering around the debate stage like he lost his imaginary cat. Check.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“But not John McCain, he gave a standard Republican speech on economics this July where he said the danger to the market was regulation!”
On the other hand, McCain, NOT B O
was the one who tried in 2002 and again in 2005 to get congress to do something about the looming mortgage crisis… and to provide oversight, especially for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
.
Obama is all talk and no action.
In Chicago, we have another term for
such a personality…….
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
A Veteran,
For my purposes, Obama’s definition works fine:
Income of $250,000 or less == middle class.
NOW ALL the Firemen, Teachers, Engineers, Waitresses, Single Moms, Police officers who make more than $250,000 raise your hand!
Because John McCain proved in the last debate that he is mostly concerned with those making over $250,000.
And Barack Obama proved that he is mostly concerned with the Middle Class.
We tried the Republican approach of $700,000 tax breaks for the fortunate few.
Let’s try a different idea: Give the middle class a break!
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Osama bin biden thinks that he will pull the giveaways, no-interest loans, free healthcare and tax breaks out of the air! It hasn’t dawned on him yet that these things COST MONEY! Where you gonna get the money Osama?
I guess you be holding rallies every week on the White House lawn so all your RICH CONTRIBUTORS (you know, the al qaida network, your rich big oil friends, your Wall Street friends and last but not least all those RICH blacks and kiddies out there supporting you) can keep on contributing to your simple-minded programs.
Posted by: Santaiscoming | October 25, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“No just impeached for perjury and obstructuction of justice.”
And the party that did that were punished in the next election.
“And the tax rate during his regime was 39%. It is 35% during Bush.”
‘I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief.’–John McCain, May 2001
“Most jobs created were government sponsored.”
FALSEHOOD.
Social security is a problem now because every president since Kennedy keeps borrowing the money from it and not intending to pay it back.
Unprovable question of intent. But here is a provable point: If you divert some of the Social Security taxes that currently pay for the Social Security checks going out, then the trust fund goes into technical default sooner and BY LAW when the trust fund goes into technical default, the benefits are reduced to the level equal to the SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES COMING INTO the system.
Therefore, when and if technical default does come, the checks will be reduced MORE if you have some workers diverting money to private accounts.”
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Income of $250,000 or less == middle class
You have no lower limits. Does that mean someone making 20,000 is middle class also?
They’ve fallen. In the early 1960s, the highest marginal income tax rate was a stunning 91 percent. That top rate fell to 70 percent after the Kennedy-Johnson tax cuts and remained there until 1981. Then Ronald Reagan slashed it to 50 percent and ultimately to 28 percent after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. Although the federal tax rate fell by more than half, total tax receipts in the 1980s doubled from $517 billion in 1981 to $1,030 billion in 1990. The top tax rate rose slightly under George H. W. Bush and then moved to 39.6 percent under Bill Clinton. But under George W. Bush it fell again to 35 percent. So what’s striking is that, even as tax rates have fallen by half over the past quarter-century, taxes paid by the wealthy have increased. Lower tax rates have made the tax system more progressive, not less so. In 1980, for example, the top 5 percent of income earners paid only 37 percent of all income taxes. Today, the top 1 percent pay that proportion, and the top 5 percent pay a whopping 57 percent.
The top 25% income earners account for 85% of the taxes. The bottom 50% only account for 3%. If middle income is figured as the remaining 25% you only account for 12%
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Unprovable question of intent
Have you seen any of the 10+trillion debt being repaid yet. I think the intent is quite clear.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Santaiscoming,
You should look to your own (candidate’s flaws) first. The Bush tax cut really slashed the incoming taxes without cutting spending.
John McCain wants to make these tax cuts, which he RIPPED as unconsciencable and tilted to the rich when he voted against them, permanent.
His spending cuts? Nowhere to be seen. (Earmarks make up half of one percent of the budget.)
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
And the party that did that were punished in the next election.
We weren’t the party that had John Kerry as a candidate.
I guess your saying he shouldn’t have been impeached then. I guess thats why we need more democratic rule so we can turn our eyes away from unlawful behavior.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Income of $250,000 or less == middle class.
Now all you small business owners and people who are working a couple of jobs to be able to live the American dream…. and those who have FINALLY made a chink your niche……
SIT DOWN.
We will give YOUR money to someone who,sadly earns only $15,000 a year because that is well below the poverty level…. and he needs it more.
We will give YOUR moen to someone who makes only $235,000.00 because, happily, he is not earning $250,000.00
and HE needs it more.
As for the small business owner whose efforts are supporting at least a handful of others, we will take HIS money so that the others can be paid.
Trickle down economy.
It didn’t work the last time.
It won’t work now!
I think we should keep our jobs HERE… but why should we if the incentive is not great enough.
The REAL problem is the need to BRING THOSE JOBS HOME….. AND PROVIDE TRAINING FOR THE NEW, GREEN JOBS!
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“You have no lower limits. Does that mean someone making 20,000 is middle class also?”
Make your own definition for the lower limit. Obama’s plans and McCain’s simply don’t have much difference for those below the middle class.
HERE IS YOUR PROBLEM:
John McCain keeps harping on how unfair it is to return the upper tax bracket to the pre-Bush level.
McCain voted against and TRASHED the tax cut when it came to a vote.
HE WAS RIGHT WHEN HE SAID THIS:
“”I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief.”–John McCain, May 2001
John McCain also said it would be more appropriate to keep the upper level where it was and use the money to lower the rate for the middle class ==> EXACTLY WHAT OBAMA HAS PROPOSED!!!
John McCain doesn’t have a tax policy. He has a self-hypocrite policy.
That is why he needs his conscience to remind him of the OLD (younger) John McCain.
A vet,
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I have done some research and the conclusion will surprise you.
It appears that ‘balls’ only get in the way and the President is better off without any.
Obama should win with no problem.
Posted by: Foolsparadise | October 25, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
How much more than 85% of the tax revenue do you want the top 25% of earners to pay???
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I have to assume a lot of people commenting here are very young.
Let’s get a few things straight.
1) All the politicians use telepromptors when giving a speech of any length. Even the spouse’s. Bush does, Cheney does, everyone does.
2) Joe the plumber is a fake. He isn’t a licensed plumber, he only makes about 40,000 a year, is in no position to buy a plumbing business and he has lien on his house for owing back taxes. But we are supposed to believe he is so upset over anyone making over $250,000 having a tax raise, he went out of his way to question it. He is more concerned with a fantasy future or the plight of rich folk than his present where he owes money and can’t make ends meet. Yeah, right, he’s not a plant.
3) The tax rate only increases the amount paid after the first $250,000. So the rich will pay an extra $300 for every $10,000 they earn, that is over the $250,000 mark. That’s it. The same rate they paid under Clinton, that’s what some are complaining about.
4) If those earning more than $250K don’t pay more, the middle class will have to. Obviously the bills are pouring in for 2 wars,the bail-out package, etc. Someone has to pay. Would it be better to take it from the class that is just barely hanging on to their house as it is?
Think.
Our country can’t be strong if we are weak economically. Our country can’t be strong if our military is stretched too thin. Our country can’t be strong if more and more of the middle-class is sliding into poverty.
Think.
Posted by: Lydia | October 25, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“Income of $250,000 or less == middle class. Now all you small business owners…”
The numbers are calling you a liar.
Only 2% of small busineses make $250,000 or more. Joe the plumber doesn’t. Not very many plumbers do.
Soak the middle class to feed the rich. Good Republican slogan there!
And people working 3 jobs are not making $250,000 either. Most of them are working multiple lower paying jobs.
and people who are working a couple of jobs to be able to live the American dream…. and those who have FINALLY made a chink your niche……
SIT DOWN.
We will give YOUR money to someone who,sadly earns only $15,000 a year because that is well below the poverty level…. and he needs it more.
We will give YOUR moen to someone who makes only $235,000.00 because, happily, he is not earning $250,000.00
and HE needs it more.
Trickle down economy is the REPUBLICAN notion of soaking the middle class for the benefit of the rich, dimwitt.
Wealth of the top 2% of Americans has doubled since 1980. Have inflation adjusted middle class wages? NOPE. They went up during the Clinton years and DOWN in the Bush years.
Barack Obama thinks the middle class need a break. John McCain is only worried about those making more than $250K.
GIVE THE MIDDLE CLASS a break now.
Trust us with our own money rather than spending it on tax breaks for millionaires.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
250,000 a year is just barely hanging on???? Oh Please
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
My comments got mixed with anothers. Here is the corrected version:
“Income of $250,000 or less == middle class. Now all you small business owners…”
The numbers are calling you a liar.
Only 2% of small busineses make $250,000 or more. Joe the plumber doesn’t. Not very many plumbers do.
Soak the middle class to feed the rich. Good Republican slogan there!
And people working 3 jobs are not making $250,000 either. Most of them are working multiple lower paying jobs.
Trickle down economy is the REPUBLICAN notion of soaking the middle class for the benefit of the rich. Let’s try trickle up instead!
The wealth of the top 2% of Americans has doubled since 1980. Have inflation adjusted middle class wages? NOPE. They went up during the Clinton years and DOWN in the Bush years.
Barack Obama thinks the middle class need a break. John McCain is only worried about those making more than $250K.
GIVE THE MIDDLE CLASS a break now.
Trust us with our own money rather than spending it on tax breaks for millionaires.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Posted by: Lydia | Oct 25, 2008 4:04:29 PM
Excellent post. If I was making that amount of money, I wouldn’t have a problem paying more.
Posted by: Jwench | October 25, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
HOW YOU KNOW that John McCain is a hypocrite:
John McCain has NOT proposed a flat tax plan.
It therefore follows that he supports some variation to the current wealthy person pays a higher tax rate policy.
ALSO, HE TRASHED the Bush tax cut and voted against it. Yet somehow going back to the pre-Bush tax rates (WHICH HE VOTED TO KEEP) is ‘redistributing wealth’.
“I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us at the expense of middle-class Americans who need tax relief.”–John McCain, May 2001
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Excellent post. If I was making that amount of money, I wouldn’t have a problem paying more.
I would like just one year at that income. I wouldn’t mind paying more either, I would still have enough left to live very comfortably
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I note that none of the diehard lefties on here are disputing the outright lie that Biden told – the campaign never paid ACORN anything. Outright lie.
ACORN literature clearly states that CSI is “ACORN’s campaign arm”
Get your facts straight, lefties.
Posted by: JG | October 25, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Let’s try trickle up instead!
Ok Mr. Conscience….
Show us!
You can’t get milk from a rock!
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
How you know Obama is a hypocrit:
Obama has NOT proposed a flat tax plan!
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Excellent post. If I was making that amount of money, I wouldn’t have a problem paying more.
I would like just one year at that income. I wouldn’t mind paying more either, I would still have enough left to live very comfortably
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 25, 2008 4:12:48 PM
I don’t even make half of that. I would love a year of that too.
They talk about patriotism and being more american than some, but yet they don’t want to give back to the country with a few extra dollars. They don’t mind that we, the middle class have been struggling for years.
Posted by: Jwench | October 25, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
One thing all of you lefties and paid Obama commenters are ignoring:
It is impossible to build up a New New Deal (1 trillion in new social spending and welfare checks called “tax credits) on the backs of the top 5% only. There simply is not enough money.
One of three results:
1. The Dollar collapses because of a trillion dollar a year deficit and we have hyperinflation, destroying the economy for a decade.
2. Obama gets a clue and decides not to spend money America does not have (unlikely)
3. Obama pushes his definition of “rich” downward until he has enough funds to play societal recreator.
Truth hurts, lefties.
Posted by: JG | October 25, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Your 2% figure must mean tiny business
Posted by: A Veteran | Oct 25, 2008 4:10:39 PM
___________
Thank you for your informative, factual post. ;-)
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
JG,
Huge tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans (the ones that McCain REJECTED before deciding it was a necesary condition for his ambition) can potentially hurt the budget more than spending.
Obama and McCain have promised new spending but McCain’s deficit projection looks worse than Obama’s simply because of his FREE MONEY policies towards corporations, upper bracket tax payers (and his future war with Russia — oops that is off budget, I forgot).
In any case, we have to decide what are the nation’s top priorities (I wouldn’t mind an end to the corn-ethanol subsidy) and use our resources to get there.
For example, if you want to move to renewable, American sources of energy, this will require investing in research and tax breaks, maybe even subsidies.
John F Kennedy sent men to the moon. But an Apollo like project costs money.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Jwench,
I don’t care about Acorn. A) They flag questionable registrations for the authorities. B) Mickey Mouse etc are not likely to show up at the voting booth. C) WHEN IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY GOING TO ADDRESS THE FALLING REAL WAGES OF MIDDLE CLASS AMERICANS?
Check C for the thing I am interested in.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
‘U.S. Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to an offshoot of the liberal Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now for services the Democrat’s campaign says it mistakenly misrepresented in federal reports.’
‘subject, but one of the people he interviewed was not so gentle. In the article the RNC says:
“Barack Obama’s failure to accurately report his campaign’s financial records is an incredibly suspicious situation that appears to be an attempt to hide his campaign’s interaction with a left-wing organization previously convicted of voter fraud. For a candidate who claims to be practicing ‘new’ politics, his FEC reports look an awful lot like the ‘old-style’ Chicago politics of yesterday.”
‘Then, after reading this statement from the story, I have to agree with the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics spokesperson who said this:
“It’s rare that people don’t file any amended reports.“
‘In my opinion, you can’t accidentally type STAGE, LIGHTING AND SOUND when the bill from your vendor obviously says”Get-Out-The-Vote Organizing.”
“And then, on ten additional, separate occasions, make the same type of mistake on separate forms, followed by ADVANCE WORK entered when the bill says Get-Out-The-Vote Organizing or POLLING when the bill says ‘Get-Out-The-Vote Organizing’.”
“This, in my opinion, is noteworthy because it sounds like a pattern of lots and lots of amendments to the FEC reports.”
“The Obama campaign can amend their reports all they want. But, had observers not discovered this obfuscation, then the lies would have continued to the end of the campaign, as they sprayed tens of millions of innocent donor dollars through various groups to fund the ACORN-Obama grass-roots campaign, under the radar of the press and public.
It does not matter so much who or how many may claim to have been “blind” to these activities. It is my opinion that the Obama campaign knew they were misleading the public and that they have no intention of offering transparency unless pressed and challenged. And I challenge all seekers of justice to continue to challenge him every day.”
________________
snipped from the:
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review 10-02-08
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“b o”
Your comment made no sense. Obama has made it clear that he wants a tax break for the middle class (including 95% of working Americans) and that he supports a progressive tax structure.
John McCain supports a progressive tax code, while telling us that a progressive tax code is ‘socialist’ and bad because it ‘redistributes the wealth’.
As Colin Powell pointed out EVERY TAX SYSTEM redistributes wealth! I John McCain against that?
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The topic of my most previous post should have read:
“Obama Campaign’s Connection to ACORN and CSI”
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Jwench,
I don’t care about Acorn. A) They flag questionable registrations for the authorities. B) Mickey Mouse etc are not likely to show up at the voting booth. C) WHEN IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY GOING TO ADDRESS THE FALLING REAL WAGES OF MIDDLE CLASS AMERICANS?
Check C for the thing I am interested in.
Posted by: John McCain’s conscience | Oct 25, 2008 4:35:25
I don’t care about it either. It’s nothing but a distraction from the real issues.
Posted by: Jwench | October 25, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
“b o”
You last post was a waste of your time. We, the middle class, need a break.
Barack Obama wants to give a tax break to the middle class. John McCain only cares about those making over $250,000.
Easy for me and the rest of the middle class to make that choice!
You can draw, paint, sing songs, and make sonnets about acorn. I hope John McCain does, since that would just bring him off-message.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 25, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
wench:
You don’t want to know about ACORN because if you opened your MIND as wide as your internet MOUTH….. something factual might pop into it….. and Obamaniacs couldn’t stand for that!
So not to worry; I understand.
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
John McCain’s conscience :
All I asked of YOU, John, was an explanation of how trickle UP economy works.
I am totally curious, because it completely escapes my powers of imagination.
But then, I am neither a politician nor an economist.
Not only that, I’m in the middle class and heavens! I’ve still switched from Hillary to John McCain!
Posted by: b o for worst case scenario | October 25, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
I believe middle class is more like 50,000 to 100,000 a year. Not 250,000 a year. Yes I believe that middle class needs some breaks. People at 250,000 in my mind are not middle class. Though I would not label them rich, I would say they are well off. I don’t see what would be wrong asking them to contribute a little more in taxes. What really is needed with that though is some fiscal responsibilty by all in government. Their lack of responsibilty is not republican or democrat. It is everyone involved. Everyone would be happier if they knew their taxes that they pay are being spent wisely and carefully.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Maybe with better spending all of our taxes could go down.
Posted by: A Veteran | October 25, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
I am frankly amazed at the abject and complete ignorance of most posters.
Tax cuts are not designed to pay for groceries, they are designed to create more revenue for the treasury.
Each and every time, taxes have been cut, that is…tax rates have been cut across the board, treasury revenues have increased. Kennedy, Reagan, and W.Bush. Liberals are too stupid to understand this.
Simple as that.
Liberals believe that it is fair, to give someone money that was taken from someone else.
It is moronic.
Posted by: libocrat | October 26, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm