Schumer Rebuts GOP on Divided Govt.
ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Z. Byron Wolf Report: With GOP candidates warning about the consequences of Democrats controlling both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue, Sen. Chuck Schumer challenged the Republican Party’s commitment to divided government on Wednesday.
"They’re not for checks and balances," said Schumer. "They’re for blocking change and backing Bush."
Speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., Schumer argued that pleas for divided government work when times are good but predicted that current GOP efforts to scare voters about the unchecked influence of Barack Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would fall on deaf ears because the public’s appetite for change is "at least" as big as it has been since 1980 when Ronald Reagan was first elected.
Schumer, who chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), made his comments six days before an election in which his party is poised to make significant gains including the possibility of winning a filibuster-proof 60 seat majority.
Schumer said Democrats, who currently have effective control on 51 seats, are significantly ahead in five pick-up opportunities (Virginia, New Mexico, New Hampshire, Colorado, and Alaska). He said Democrats are find themselves "a little bit ahead" or roughly even in an additional six pick-up opportunities.
Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu is the lone Democratic incumbent to have faced any significant competition this year but she now finds herself comfortably ahead, according to Schumer.
On what he called the "$64,000 question" of whether Democrats would reach 60 Senate seats, Schumer once again called it possible without guaranteeing it.
"It’s hard to get to 60 and I don’t want to oversell it," said Schumer. "It’s hard because it’s lots of very Red States."
The 60-seat question may not be settled until Dec. 2, according to Schumer.
That’s the date when Georgia would hold a run-off between incumbent Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss and Democratic challenger Jim Martin. A Senate race is triggered in the Peach State if no candidate receives more than 50 percent of the vote. A run-off in Georgia is possible because of the closness of the contest between the two major-party candidates and the presence in the race of Libertarian candidate Allen Buckley.
Schumer said he has not seen polling in Alaska since a Washington, DC, jury convicted Republican Sen. Alaska Ted Stevens on seven counts of failing to report gifts.
The DSCC chair expressed confidence, however, that Democrats would win the seat, adding that Anchorage Democratic Mayor Mark Begich would be helped by calls for Stevens to resign from Republicans John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Mitch McConnell.
On the topic of Democratic turnout efforts, Schumer said the DSCC learned from GOP successes in 2004 and have, over the last two cycles, made a major investment in the party’s "ground game." Schumer estimated that the DSCC is spending one dollar on turnout for every two and a half dollars that it is spending to air television ads.
On the policy front, Schumer said Democrats are not going to rubber-stamp Obama’s health-care plan.
He expressed confidence, however, that a health-care overhaul would be enacted in the next two years and praised Obama as someone who would work closely with Congress on the specifics of any legislation.
Beyond health care, Schumer predicted Democrats would also be able to pass significant policy changes on Iraq, energy, immigration, education, and the regulation of financial services if Republicans lose the ability to bottle things up in the Senate.
Schumer held his pen and pad briefing with reporters at the Mott House on Capitol Hill.

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
A divided Government works when you know what each party stands for. The Republican party has been hi-jacked by far right, radical neocons so a lot of Americans are just fine seeing what the Dems can do.
Posted by: Just Vote | October 29, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Change is coming….
Posted by: becky | October 29, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I’m a Democrat and I agree with John McCain that a Democratic Congress, along with a Democratic President, would be a disaster. My party has been hijacked by the far left-wing, and I want no part of it. That said, I’m no fan of the Republicans. I guess now I’m an independent. In this election, I think McCain is the lesser of two evils. Reluctantly, I’ll vote for him. The thought of a Pelosi/Reid/Obama administration is frightening to me, and to a lot of other Southerners.
Posted by: Sarah Beth | October 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Oh Sara just stay at home please. more of the same “scare” talk. oh, by the way Sara……westerner here.
Posted by: seansatx | October 29, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
how soon we forget Republicans had control of congress and white house from 2000-2006 under George Bush, and where did that get us?
McCain wasn’t whineing then
Posted by: oh really | October 29, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Let switch parties the Republicans were in control for 6 Years,And look at what we ended up with anyway the Republican party now is too far right! DEMOCRATS ALL THE WAY!
Posted by: Angie | October 29, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I hope Mr. Schumer enjoys the next two years. Once the public realizes they’ve been had by Congress and that the ‘change’ they getting is nothing more than the same, failed, ‘tax and spend’ Democratic policies of the past, they’ll make another change.
Hopefully, someone other than the Republicans will be the beneficiaries of the 2010 next change.
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | October 29, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Gotta go with the Dems all the way this time. The Rethugs have been taken over by the nutty extreme right. Those people can’t catch their arse with both hands, plus they are REALLY yearning for the Rupture…err Rapture. Ya’ll go ahead and Rupture, we normal people will work to get the USA back on her feet and restore our integrity around the world.
Posted by: Clint | October 29, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
I’m voting for Barack because I want a whole bunch of free stuff, and I want other people to pay for it. I also want a house. I don’t like the one I’m living in, but I think I might like yours. Barack’s gonna redistribute some of your wealth over my way, so that’s why I’m voting for him! Obama/Biden 08!!!
Posted by: Barry's My Man | October 29, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
John McCain on Nancy Pelosi:
“I respect Speaker Pelosi. I think she’s one of the great American success stories,” McCain said during an interview with The Chronicle prior to a fundraiser at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco.
“We talk about (New York Sen.) Hillary Clinton and her inspiration to millions of Americans. Speaker Pelosi has been an inspiration as well” in a role that is “in many ways … more powerful than the president.”
Posted by: just Vote | October 29, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Unprecedented sums of campaign money.
Unprecedented broken promises of campaign finance reform.
Unprecedented inexperience for the office.
Unprecedented ties to criminals and terrorists.
Unprecedented associations to voter fraud groups.
Unprecedented capitulation to America’s enemies.
Unprecedented arrogance.
Unprecedented lack of good judgment.
Unprecedented lurch towards a Socialist Dictatorship.
This is not the “change” America needs.
Reject Barack Obama.
Posted by: One_American | October 29, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
I used to support Barack Obama, but he said the Constitution was a flawed document. He said the Warren court wasn’t radical enough. John McCain spent his whole life defending the Constitution, and he wouldn’t call it names for political gains. Barack Obama is too radical.
Posted by: Obamacrat for McCain | October 29, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“Wealth redistribution” has no place in a free democracy.
It is, however, the cornerstone of a COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIP:
“We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism.”
- Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959
Stop kidding yourselves, Liberals.
Reject Barack Obama.
Posted by: One_American | October 29, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Obamacrat for McCain
Barry’s My Man
you 2 need to stop drinking Palins bath water, use your brain, if you can post here you can find out the truth
Posted by: joe the votor | October 29, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Anyone who thinks Barack Obama is going to give anyone a tax cut is a fool. Past performance is a good predictor of future performance. Obama believes in raising taxes, not lowering them. He has a new TV ad in Missouri. The new ad claims anyone who has a job and makes less than $200,000 will get a tax cut. (Last week it was anyone making less than $250,000, employed or not.) This guy is making it up as he goes along.
Posted by: JB in St. Louis | October 29, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
The Federal Reserve cut a key short-term interest rate by a half-percentage point today, dropping the federal funds rate from 1.5 percent to 1 percent. The Fed also expressed continued worries about the damage being done to the economy by the ongoing crisis in the financial and credit markets.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
I am voting for every Democrat on the ticket. I am not leaving anyone of them out. I have had it with Republicans.
Posted by: becky | October 29, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
d0: LOL you are joking right?
Posted by: becky | October 29, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Shumer conveniently forgets the Carter years. He conveniently forgets that the 3 most prosperous decades in America (post Industrial Revolution) were the 50′s, the 80′s and the 90′s. What did all 3 have in common? Divided government.
Posted by: MBNA Joe | October 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
I hope all of you watch Obama’s 30 minute commercial tonight. There are a whole lot of you confused about his policies.
You have been listening and watching to so many GOP lies that you can’t tell what is a lie and what is the truth anymore. You guys have Obama’s policies so screwed up.
Posted by: becky | October 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Palin said at a rally yesterday in Poortown Pa. “Obama wants to take your wealth & give it to whomever he chooses” they all booed.
The funniest quote from Ed Rendell Gov. of Pa. yesterday. “No one in the croud had any wealth”
Any idiot knows presidents don’t sit in the oval office exchanging money
BUT AS GOVERNOR OF ALASKA – THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT SHE DID
Posted by: watching | October 29, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
History repeats itself. After the Great Depression, the Democrats had to clean up the mess left by hoover. Now the Democrats are going to have to clean up the bush/cheney mess. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | October 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Ironic that the Republicans are arguing that they should have veto power over any Democratic bill, but remains silent that they held Congress( with solid people like Newt Gingrich), the presidency (George Bush) and have appointed 7 of the 9 US Supreme Court Justices, 4 appointed by the Bush’s! A disingenuous argument at best!
As usually the Republicans have a real hard time with a simple thing called the truth!
Posted by: Dan | October 29, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
MBNA Joe – I think there’s a difference between divided government and polarized government. While the democratic party has always been to the left of center to one degree or another, the republican party has gotten radically right-wing, with so-called “morals” and “religion” thrown into the mix that they want to impose on everyone. I am a democrat and have had admiration for some republicans over the years and wouldn’t have had a problem supporting them. But THIS republican party is so over the top. They do not represent me or anything I believe in. That is polarization.
Posted by: Brianna | October 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Becky
Think again…Palin could very well be President. That should be enough of a reason to vote for Obama.
Did you mind the past 6 years of Republican majority in Congress with a Republican president??
Posted by: scooterfoot | October 29, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
If you want to know why Americans are so turned off by McCain/Palin – just read the posts from their supporters. Rarely, do you ever see a positive thing said about their candidate. It is smear and slam Obama all the way.
Sadly, it says a whole lot about your candidate.
Posted by: just Vote | October 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I’m a PUMA Democrat. There are two overwhelming facts that are dragging down the McCain campaign. The first is Sarah Palin; independents think she is an idiot and therefore a mark on Sen. McCain’s judgement. The second is the media is creating this image on the marching orders of the Obama campaign. Did you see that CNN interview where the reporter asks Gov. Palin what she tought about, and he quotes, a prominent conservative thinks you’re stupid and corrupt, when in fact that prominent conservative said the media is making her out to be stupid and corrupt? The viewers watching the report think, “even conservatives think she’s a moron; she must be a moron!” when in fact it’s the elite media that is pushing the idea that Gov. Palin is a moron. It’s a brilliant move by the dirty Obama machine. Nothing else worked. they said she had a special needs child, therefore she should have rejected the nomination. That was sexist. They said she was just a small-town mayor and therefore unqualified for Federal office, when in fact 1) small-town mayer is one of the toughest executive civilian jobs in the world and 2) they ignore the fact that she is the sitting governor of the largest and therefore most complex state in the union. They said she was mistaken when she said the office of the Vice President was President of the Senate, when in fact 1) it is 2) that’s the excuse Democrats are using to strip VP Cheney of Executive Priviledge, that he’s an officer of the US Legislature and 3) if the VP just sits around just in case the President becomes incompacitated, why can’t she do that and have a special needs child? The Obama campaign rather talk about Gov. Palin’s clothes when in fact everyone does this, put prominent people in top-of-the-line clothes so they can auction it off for top dollar for charities. Professional athletes do it; they use a new jersey every game. Why? they don’t have to; it would save money, but they auction it off, “Kobe Bryant played an NBA game in this jersey!” for top dollar and donate it to charity. They rather nurse their lead and run out the clock on us, than talk about the important issues of the day, such as: why does Sen. Obama think the restrictive nature of the Constitution make it a flawed document? why does he think 5 Supreme Court justices should make slavery reparations a matter of Constitutional law? You see, John McCain will protect the Constitution by appointing strict constructionist judges. Sen. Obama will appoint radical judges that will use and distort the United States Constitution to advance their own activist agenda: on the issue of redistributive reparations, Barack Obama thinks judges should make a white-tax and a refundable black-tax-credit (aka handout, welfare) a matter of Constitutiontal law.
Posted by: Clintonites for McCain | October 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I’m confident that Obama, Biden, Pelosi,and Reid will fix everything thats wrong in America. Middle class obesity.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
You have been listening and watching to so many GOP lies that you can’t tell what is a lie and what is the truth anymore. You guys have Obama’s policies so screwed up.
Posted by: becky | Oct 29, 2008 3:11:55 PM
That’s what parrots do. Repeat everything. They don’t know if it’s true or not.
Posted by: Jwench | October 29, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Middle class obesity.
________________________________
Yea, they’ll leave Rush, Hannity and Morris alone. They seem happy obese and ignorant.
Posted by: Get Real | October 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Posted by: Clintonites for McCain | Oct 29, 2008 3:44:07 PM
How many PUMA memebers left 20?
Posted by: Jwench | October 29, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
SillY SaraH is having one more baby
Posted by: rufus | October 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Clintonites for McCain,
If you do not know or understand what a socialist society is, you are in it. A complete control, well getting there, of the propaganda machine to achieve anything you want your subsidiaries. Mr. 0bama knows and practice well that he can via his media repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Sarah Palin, your the worse thing to ever happen to the GOP. You have divided the party and driven people into Obama’s arms. Keep up the good work, throw more mud, make up more lies and please, please steal more money.
Posted by a “REAL” American from the lower 48.
Posted by: Kathy | October 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
How many PUMA memebers left 20?
Posted by: Jwench | Oct 29, 2008 3:55:09 PM
I’m one, too. There are millions of us, apparently not as many as ACORN fraudulent votes, though, or else Sen. Clinton would be our nominee and not Sen. Obama.
Posted by: DemMcCrats for McCain | October 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Sarah Beth, you about as much a democrat as your namesake Palin is, save the hogwash for your fellow neo-cons.
Posted by: JR | October 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
– Mr. 0bama knows and practice well that he can via his media repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth. –
Umm, that is the GOP mantra, spearheaded by Karl Rove and well practiced over the last few election cycles. Unfortunately for them, people have seen through the tactic and only the ignorant are falling for it this year.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
I’m one, too. There are millions of us, apparently not as many as ACORN fraudulent votes, though, or else Sen. Clinton would be our nominee and not Sen. Obama.
Posted by: DemMcCrats for McCain | Oct 29, 2008 3:59:26 PM
Well there are 85% of us Hillary supporters who are doing the right thing and voting for Obama.
Posted by: Jwench | October 29, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
The GOP is a broken party.. they would not even invite their grand puba Bush to the nomination convention. McCain claims he is the change candidate, but is a clone of Bush, only dumber. Palin is out spewing complete ignorance, claiming that under Obama, the government will own your soul and every possession you have. They are living in a world of denial and illusion, and have not figured out that it’s their positions on the issues that are wrong.
The GOP may be old, but they are far from being grand.
Posted by: ou812 | October 29, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Concerned American,
Rove my you-know-what.
Let me repeat it, although I only need do it twice since it is not a lie:
Mr. 0bama knows and practices well that he can via his media repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth.
He is as dangerous as the person who said it.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
– Mr. 0bama knows and practices well that he can via his media repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth. –
Please cite a few examples.. I’d be interested in seeing what you consider ‘lies’ since you obviously ignore the blatent ones the McCain camp has been throwing around.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Concerned American,
“I only increase taxes on those who makes more than $250,000″.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
– “I only increase taxes on those who makes more than $250,000″. –
And your proof it’s a lie?
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Concerned American,
McCain voted to give the big oil taxes credit, while I (0bama) am against giving them taxes credit.
Fact: 0bama voted along Bush’s line to give the largest taxes credit to the big oils. McCain and Hillary Clinton voted against it.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Still waiting..
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Concerned American,
I “0bama” will vote against and filabuster Bush’s bill to spy on you – when I need your votes in the primaries.
I “0bama” voted for the bill giving my president Bush the right to spy on you, to listen to your phone conversations without warrant, to listen to our soldiers in Iraq phone sex with their wives.
Who cares the Constitution. I “0bama” only need votes, I “0bama” am willing to take your constitutional rights away.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Concerned American,
You should be concerned. Blindness in politics is unhealthy. Chairman Mao achieved his goals with the help of hundreds of millions supporters, “for the common good of the society”.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
“Again, Red States, you are entitled to your beliefs, but we the Blue States really would like you to have your own country where you can kill those on death row but lecture 16 year old mothers about abortion. And we’ll have our own country where we don’t have to be surrounded by uneducated hillbillies who think Obama is unexperienced but that George W. was perfectly qualified.” Posted by: Laura | Oct 29, 2008 10:37:43 AM
Laura, you’ve told us more about yourself than about the people with whom you disagree. Attacking people on a personal level simply because they hold different political beliefs than you illustrates your own lack of maturity. I used to do the same thing myself – when I was sixteen years old.
Posted by: Charlott Waring | October 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Concerned American,
I never knew or heard what my uncle-like rev. Wright said in my career building, baby holy washing, marriage licensing Trinity.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Bush, the Iraq war, Wall street greed, global warming,no universal health care.I can’t take it anymore i’m out of Prozac fix me Bami, fix me Whaaa Whaaa Whaaa.
Posted by: Hippie Smasher | October 29, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Concerned American,
You typical white person, it’s our time, my 0bama time.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
You see, your arguments fail given you cite no references to support your argument. I’ll give you an example.. In the democratic convention, Obama said:
“As President, I will tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power.”
http://www.demconvention.com/barack-obama/
And then, in the Republican convention, McCain said:
“Senator Obama thinks we can achieve energy independence without more drilling and without more nuclear power.”
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/conventions/videos/transcripts/20080904_MCCAIN_SPEECH.html
See.. now that is a lie, flat out, and with references..
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
It would be wonderful if the majority of you who are giving your comments could be innovative by coming up with solutions to help our our country instead of thrashing the candidates and their running mates. Is America ready to legalize drugs? Can America rebuild are manufacturing infrastructor? Does America need a new party that truly represents the people? These are just few ideas that I am throwing out there. Please give some of your input or your own ideas or questions that we can discuss and share. Whom ever wins in the end is still our president no matter if he is a donkey or elephant but meanwhile let’s be positive with our comments and be creative with your ideas in how to make America better.
Posted by: cony007 | October 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
As one pollster stated “PUMA’s are dead”.
Among Democrats, Barack Obama is now winning 88 percent support, comparable to John Kerry in 2004 or Al Gore in 2000. It is expected that Obama will scrape up against the 90 percent number on election day.
By contrast, John McCain is winning the support of just 85.3 percent of Republicans, well down from Bush’s 93 percent in 2004 and 91 percent in 2000.
Posted by: facts DO INDEED matter | October 29, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Concerned American,
“find ways to safely harness nuclear power”
0bama found ways of building exactly zero, Zero, that’s nada, nuclear power plants in the next 10 years.
We, on the other hand, found exact Zero word of nuclear in his political platform.
Zero is his character; done nothing, doing nothing and will do nothing, nada.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Concerned American,
You want me to believe the repeats that the very statement you are trying to prove: “Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth”. All the things you have been citing are the repeats that 0bama relies on.
A typical white logic.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
– let’s be positive with our comments and be creative with your ideas in how to make America better. –
I agree, however the anti-obama crowd seems bent on simply throwing mud and ducking issues.
For example, trickle down taxation plans have failed horribly time and time again. Since it was coined by Hoover in 1927, and played a significant role in what happened in 1929. Regan managed to set the record in unemployment and raise the national debt more than all presidents before him combined (from under $1 trillion to over $2.6). Bush Jr. managed to take a balanced budget and still raise the deficit by $133 billion his first year.
I have yet hear one single person explain how McCain differs significantly in any platform stance from Bush.
In contrast, Obamas plan will get the economy back on track by injecting capital into the heart of the economic engine. In addition, his health plan is superior to McCains in every aspect, will allow more Americans to obtain insurance, and will further inject an estimated $140 billion a year into the economy as savings to employers providing health insurance to their workers. The increased number of insured patients in the system will further inject capital into our economy.
Obamas foreign policy stance one of dialog, not military might. That is one issue cited by Powell as his reason for supporting Obama, as it the reasons given by most military officials like the former supreme commander of Nato, and various other military officials.
There is a reason the world is looking forward to Obama being in the White House, and it is unfortunate that many cannot, or simply don’t want to see it.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
– “find ways to safely harness nuclear power” –
– 0bama found ways of building exactly
– zero, Zero, that’s nada, nuclear power
– plants in the next 10 years.
– We, on the other hand, found exact Zero
– word of nuclear in his political platform
Well, if you look at the library of congress, you will see two bills introduced by Obama related to nuclear safety:
S.1977 : A bill to provide for sustained United States leadership in a cooperative global effort to prevent nuclear terrorism, reduce global nuclear arsenals, stop the spread of nuclear weapons and related material and technology, and support the responsible and peaceful use of nuclear technology.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 8/2/2007)
S.2224 : A bill to require a licensee to notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the State and county in which a facility is located, whenever there is an unplanned release of radioactive substances.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack [IL] (introduced 10/24/2007)
And while McCain has proposed in words, he has Zero legislation regarding nuclear power or it’s safety. Not surprising though.. McCain has been pretty absent from Congress this session, missing more votes than any other Senator (over 64%).. and while he has only introduced 38 pieces of legislation (compared to 130 by Obama), most are simply focused on either the military or native indians.
http://thomas.loc.gov/
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
The reason why the conservatives are so scared of a democratic congress and president is because they know when they had a republican congress and president they ruined America! So these conservative supporters can tell you what happens when you let people that aren’t responsible or care about the American people represent you~> the past 8 years! Some people don’t like to look at the facts (conservatives) but reality is.. President Bush sucked and McCain hasn’t told us anything he’s going to do differently…
Posted by: irony | October 29, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Can America rebuild are manufacturing infrastructor?
Posted by: cony007 | Oct 29, 2008 4:30:01 PM
—-
Yes, we can build, not rebuild, its infrastructure and create and keep jobs here.
This can only happen, if you disagree I’d be happy to hear your alternative, when there is a truly energy independent solution. This solution is possible and the answer is nuclear power. Unlike 0bama dancing around it with occasional scare tactics of nuclear accident and waste, it needs an honest political effort investing in science and technology, which in fact already exist but of course needs further development.
If you spend $1 trillion in the next 10 years, far less than what you already are going (have) to spend on Iraq to secure its oil/energy, you will be build an economy based on 70 to 80% nuclear energy (that already in France).
0bama plans to build exactly Zero power plants in his life.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Concerned American,
You should stop repeating lies. Zero-bama proposes to build Zero nuclear power plants during his term if he was elected. This is a fact. You only hope to repeat your lies 1000 times, and you think it will become the truth.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
& what conservatives do is hide all of their beliefs behind their religion and the word of God. When they hide their hate behind the words of God, they are using his name in vain. Please believe God is watching and knows the hearts of every person in the world. He’s looking inside some of these conservatives and he’s wondering how they can glorify his name and then say such ugly things inside.
Much like Jerry Falwell and his followers but they don’t understand these ways aren’t God-like and he will condemn them for their actions.
Posted by: irony | October 29, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
– 0bama plans to build exactly Zero power plants in his life. –
Can you give me next weeks lotto numbers also?? Florida and New York would suffice :)
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
so don’t be fooled by the hate spreading around this nation; they are not lovers of America or anything American. If they were, then they would stop doing the things to tear down the unifying fabric of our nation..
USA!
Obama/Biden 2008
Posted by: irony | October 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Can you give me next weeks lotto numbers also?? Florida and New York would suffice :)
Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 29, 2008 4:56:10 PM
—-
Florida: 622246
NY: 02262
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
McCain wants me to pay more taxes so he can give to the wealthy. What a crock! No way Mac Daddy! A dumber Bush is not what this country needs, and not what America or the world wants.
Obama/Biden in 2008 – it will be great!
Posted by: weezer | October 29, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people, God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
Posted by: TheRev | October 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
McCain wants me to pay more taxes so he can give to the wealthy. What a crock! No way Mac Daddy! A dumber Bush is not what this country needs, and not what America or the world wants.
Obama/Biden in 2008 – it will be great!
Posted by: weezer | Oct 29, 2008 5:02:00 PM
McCain is not rasing your taxes
Posted by: reddog0216 | October 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
That’s because the pdf of his energy plan is for some reason not “searchable.” Go to his web site and read this document:
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/factsheet_energy_speech_080308.pdf
You will clearly see a pragmatic, responsible position on nuclear energy
Posted by: colo guy | October 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people, God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
Posted by: TheRev | Oct 29, 2008 5:06:20 PM
Your right instead of the three strike law we should execute after two felonies
Posted by: reddog0216 | October 29, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people, God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
Posted by: TheRev | Oct 29, 2008 5:06:20 PM
—-
0bama’s Reverend for 20 years, his and his wife’s and their children’s entire adult and youth lives.
Posted by: d0 | October 29, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
**** reddog ****
McCain is not rasing your taxes
****************
Yes he will. I will pay more in taxes under McCains plan than under Obamas plan. And why? So he can give it to the wealthy in the form of larger tax cuts.
Posted by: weezer | October 29, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
weezer,
You need to understand that you get less tax cut because you make too little, but you are actually getting a greater tax rate cut.
If you make only $20,000 and get 5% cut in tax rate, your get $1,000 in tax cut.
If the rich makes $1,000,000, who pays $35,000, almost twice of your entire income, get just 1% cut in tax rate, 500% less than yours, he gets $10,000 tax cut.
Do you understand the difference??????
0bama taught you poor, less-educated people so bitterly well.
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
who pays $350,000, almost twenty times of your entire income
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
factcheck, it is you who apparently doesn’t get it.
McCain will tax the middle class more so he can give it to the wealthy. That was HIS argument back in 2000 when he opposed bush and his tax cuts for the wealthy.
Funny, but now it is the other way around, the more ignorant scream out how it isn’t so.
Posted by: weezer | October 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
– You need to understand that you get less tax cut because you make too little, but you are actually getting a greater tax rate cut. –
Only if you compare McCains plan to the existing tax rate, which is incorrect. You need to compare McCain to Obama, not McCain to existing.
Under McCains plan, the middle class will pay more taxes, the wealthy will pay less. Period. Simple. Twist it how you like, but facts are facts.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Bush ran on the premise of being a uniter and not a divider. Once in office he and the Republicans never attempted to work with the other side unitl 9/11 and that was to prey on a weakend period sympathy and fear to allow the president to settle a personal grudge against Saddam. After the 2006 elections, Bush said he was to going to work with the Democratic congress and continued his devisive ways. 6 years of not vetoing a single bill under a republican congress but was quick to use his veto when the Dems were in charge. Obama has talked about unity and McCain wants to instill fear. I hope the Dems win it all and when they do they will show those haters that they do want to work together with the other side. A prime example is that how they included the republicans in talks about the bailout.
Posted by: George | October 29, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
– You need to understand that you get less tax cut because you make too little, but you are actually getting a greater tax rate cut. –
Only if you compare McCains plan to the existing tax rate, which is incorrect. You need to compare McCain to Obama, not McCain to existing.
Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 29, 2008 5:32:25 PM
—-
One fact is that McCain does not increase anyone’s income taxes. The second fact is that 0bama will INCREASE many people’s, those making $110K per couple, taxes.
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
– The second fact is that 0bama will INCREASE many people’s, those making $110K per couple, taxes. –
Bzzzt.. wrong answer. Where do you people come up with this stuff?
Married filing jointly, you would have to earn over $250 before you see a tax increase in your federal income tax.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/numbers/displayatab.cfm?Docid=1976&DocTypeID=7
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Good Americans,
I have been wondering why it is evil if you have made your American Dreams. Why do you think it needs to be punished by the government, 0bama’s government, if you are successful?
Posted by: skinny dog | October 29, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Married filing jointly, you would have to earn over $250 before you see a tax increase in your federal income tax.
—-
Concerned,
There used to be marriage penalty; now, 0bama is bringing it back!
According to your numbers, a married couple making $250K will see their taxes increase tremendously, but if you are single you do not get tax hikes by 0bama before you exceed $200K.
It seems that you guys are penalizing marriage, the nucleus of the country, by a warping $150K.
0bama = marriage penalty on taxes.
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
– I have been wondering why it is evil if you have made your American Dreams. Why do you think it needs to be punished by the government, –
I would hardly say that the wealthy have been punished over the last 100 years or so that a progressive tax system has been in place. However, in a period of record deficit spending, everyone is punished, regardless of income. That is the reason we are in a recession. When the economy is strong everyone benefits. Strange how people seem to overlook that simple fact.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
– 0bama = marriage penalty on taxes. –
If you refuse to research the garbage you spew, you will simply continue to shoot yourself in the foot everytime you open your mouth..
http://obama.senate.gov/news/060130-bayh_obama_urge/
– According to your numbers, a married couple making $250K will see their taxes increase tremendously, –
Tremendously?? $250K is the break even point.. so they would not see their taxes increase a dime.
– It seems that you guys are penalizing marriage, the nucleus of the country, by a warping $150K. –
You are indeed funny.. I could pull numbers out of thin air as well, but instead prefer to base my analysis on reality and the figures provided. Keep clinging.. it will all be over soon.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Concerned American,
Correct me if I was wrong, but isn’t it true that business and jobs, a large portion of them, are created by these evil “rich” people, who use the wealth to invest, taking the risk of losing it all, in business and in whatever? I do think you are correct in that the “small” increase in tax burden is not to alter greatly the life style of the rich. They will simply proportionally invest less, which translates to less advance in job creation and less productivity, which further translates to less government income from taxation, not to mention, less opportunities of finding jobs for the poor.
If you keep progressively increasing the tax burden, at what rate do you believe, does 0bama believe, to be “fair”?
Posted by: skinny dog | October 29, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
– If you keep progressively increasing the tax burden, at what rate do you believe, does 0bama believe, to be “fair”? –
He has already stated that rates would go back to pre-bush levels but less than or equal to that under Clinton..
And your ‘trickle down’ argument failed at the box office. Has never worked, and continuing to try it expecting a different result is simply delusional. And it also is the reason we are in a recession at the moment in case you missed it.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I could pull numbers out of thin air as well, but instead prefer to base my analysis on reality and the figures provided. Keep clinging.. it will all be over soon.
Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 29, 2008 6:10:43 PM
—-
Look, you said singles get taxed more beginning from $200K, and couples at $250K, numbers that I do question.
Even so, two singles would get tax increase at $400K, a couple (two people) get taxed more by 0bama at $250K. The last time I checked, $400K minus $250K equals to $150K.
A couple, married, get penalized by extra taxes on $150K over two unmarried singles.
It seems to me a marriage tax penalty, unless you have a better description which I will be willing to use.
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Concerned American,
If Hillary Clinton’s proposal to use the $300 billion to target banking, mortgage and financial sectors one year ago was recognized as the correct solution and a better judgment on the status of the economy, we might, just might have avoided the market crash and financial crisis that leads to the current recession.
0bama ridiculed Clinton’s proposal, pushed for Bush’s money giveways. Perhaps, that $600 really did you well, but it did nothing for the economy.
This is a glimpse of his yet another lack of judgment on key issues.
This is more important than trickle down or tax up economies.
Posted by: skinny dog | October 29, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
– It seems to me a marriage tax penalty, unless you have a better description which I will be willing to use. –
And how exactly is that different that the existing tax code? There is nothing stopping a married couple from filing seperately.. or one as an individual and another as head of household.
And regardless of whos tax plan you support, the bottom line is that this country needs to raise capital to balance the budget and end deficit spending. McCain does not do that at all and would rely on cutting spending. And he will have a lot more cutting to do since his proposed plans would cost us almost twice that of Obamas.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27311863/
As the saying goes, I am truly amazed at how people will deliberately cut off their nose to spite their face.. fortunately, the more intelligent individuals have seen through the rhetoric and are voting in record numbers this year..
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108043/Candidate-Support-Education.aspx
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
– we might, just might have avoided the market crash and financial crisis that leads to the current recession. –
Wrong.. we have been in a recession for much longer than the recent crisis which was just a side effect. The primary reason for recession, and eventual economic depression is sustained large scale deficit spending. And as the National Bureau on Economic Research says:
“Never in the history of modern economics has a large industrial country run persistent current account deficits of the magnitude posted by the U.S. since 2000.”
http://www.nber.org/digest/mar06/w11541.html
And back in their December 2001 report, they said:
“All good things must come to an end, including good economic times. It’s now official that the longest economic expansion in U.S. records has ended after ten years of rising incomes and employment. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the private non-profit research organization that is the official arbiter for dating economic cycles, recently declared that the latest expansion ended and a recession began in March”.
http://www.nber.org/feldstein/bg120401.html
That was 2001, and the handwriting was on the wall, yet Bush continued to push for even more tax cuts neglecting increased spending, particularly after he performed the largest government reorganization since WWII (costing us $50 billion a year), and his unprovoked attack on Iraq (costing us $10 billion a month).
McCain is Bush on steroids, since he wants even more tax cuts. Former fed chairman Volker and Greenspan both are against that, as are most economic gurus in our country. McCain has admitted he knows nothing about the economy, and he continues to show that lack of knowledge.. he refuses to realize that continued tax cuts will destroy this country, and is doing so simply to get votes.
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id
—-
Concerned,
Is that from the person who tinkles when he hears 0bama speaking?
I do not trust anything said by a person who pees or erects in his pants when he hears the person he admires making a feeling-good speech.
Posted by: factcheck | October 29, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“Never in the history of modern economics has a large industrial country run persistent current account deficits of the magnitude posted by the U.S. since 2000.”
=====
I see, Mr. Concerned American, where 0bama’s comparison came from. In January and February, 0bama kept telling us that the Clinton administration and the Bush administration were the same. I suppose he already attributed the current market crash and recession to that prior to the last economic cycle.
Guess what, that comparison is the reason that I am against 0bama. He has sold out his fellow democrat, the only successful President of the party in the past 60 years. 0bama sold his souls for the only purpose of deceiving voters to get their votes.
Posted by: skinny dog | October 29, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
– 0bama kept telling us that the Clinton administration and the Bush administration were the same. –
Perhaps in your world..
– I suppose he already attributed the current market crash and recession to that prior to the last economic cycle. –
Unless I’m mistaken, Bush took office in 2000, with a balanced budget and 3.9% unemployment rate.. he managed to raise the deficit by $133 billion in his first year due to his tax cuts, and we just hit 6.1% unemployment last August. We have been in a large scale deficit spending cycle since Bush took office, and that is the reason for recession.
Now, please explain how McCain differs significantly from Bush on any of his platform stances?
Posted by: Concerned American | October 29, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Update America:
What does spreading the wealth really mean? Not only tax credits as most of you think but it will also include Condemnation, the taking of property under Eminent Domain sometimes with appropriate compensation.
The majority opinion in the Supreme Court case involving New London, Conn., limited the homeowners’ rights by saying local governments could take private property for economic-development-related projects because the motive was to bring more jobs and tax revenue to a city. Moreover, the federal government may use land that is considered for the good of the general public.
How does it work? Charlie, no property owner, is included in a federal land project that supports giving owned land (property) to those persons the federal government considers qualified to own land. Joe the land owner has 24,000 square feet of land on which Joe the land owner only uses 12,000 square feet for housing. The federal government in its share the wealth program condemns half of Joe the land owner’s owned land and gives him a tax credit as just compensation for the land. The local government sub-divides the property into two lots. The half that was condemned is now titled to the new owner, Charlie no property owner, who is now Joe the land owner.
Condemnation can apply to Joe the land owner with large acreage. The federal government in its share the wealth program condemns 10 acres of Joe the land owner and gives a tax credit as just compensation. The local government zones the property as residential and sub-divides the land into housing lots. Charlie, no property owner, is selected to receive a lot to build a house.
Wake up America your rights are melting away by the way of socialism.
No Obama share the wealth programs for those in the know.
Posted by: Update America | October 29, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The democrats have been hijacked by the far left apparatchiks Pelosi and Reid. Obama is the icing on the cake for the ultra left government that will be in power.
Posted by: OB Ron | October 29, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Mission Accomplished! Democracy in Iraq, Failure at home! Long live the Bush legacy…failure, failure, failure.
Posted by: WorkingClassHero | October 29, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
WorkingClassHero,
Karl Marx would be very proud of you and 0bama for your class divide.
Posted by: Harvard Smart | October 29, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
I would perfer one branch of the Government be in the opposite parties hands to be a check and balance … a locked rubber stamp will produce bad legislation …no question about it
Posted by: Psalms83 | October 30, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
How soon you idiot Democrats forget that you had a Democratic trio in the 1990s and they ran the country into the ground and caused a recession and did away with balanced budgets, and destroyed the military and intelligence communities and got us attacked over and over because Democrats are weak on security. I don’t agree with everything the Republicans did in their 6 years, but it has taken the Democrats just two years to destroy our economy, and yes it was the Democrats who pushed for loans people couldn’t pay back and the Clinton Administration who said they would prosecut the banks, that wouldn’t give bad loans, with trumped up racism charges. It was Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Obama and his economic advisors who masterminded the current Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac debacle. So to have the Democrats in charge of everything like in the 90s the would destroy this country even further. I left the Democratic party because it is only for radical leftists now, the gays, the baby killers, only those with perverse morals. You have to be an idiot to vote for a Democrat at any level this time around.
Posted by: Ozark_Sunshine | October 30, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Becky – you were never a Republican but have been a lying Democrat the whole time. You’ve exposed yourself more than a gay priest. You’ve been drunk by warped sense of morals. You are obviously too stupid to have even read Obama’s policies, which contain lots of lies anyway. Shut off your computer before the idiot police come take you away.
Posted by: Former_Democrat | October 30, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm