Tax Expert: Palin Has to Declare Clothes
I just got off the phone with a well-respected and well-known tax attorney who doesn’t want to be identified.
I asked him earlier in the day whether Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin can avoid paying taxes on the $150,000 worth of clothes the RNC bought her, as she and the RNC maintain. (They said the RNC now owns the clothes; she’s just borrowing them.)
He said that, after consulting with a number of experts at his prominent firm, he thinks the RNC and Gov. Palin are wrong.
"It’s probably not a ‘gift,’" he said. "The issue is whether it counts as ‘income.’"
Palin’s claim that the pricey duds belong to the RNC and she’s just "borrowing" them and will return them later, reminds him, he says, of some of the issues going on in the prosecution of Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. (Some of the issues, he specified, not the allegations of criminality.)
"This is exactly the issue with the Stevens case," he said. "When you loan something to someone can you call it a ‘loan’ if, upon its return, it has no practical value?
"The consensus view is she would have to count the wardrobe as income at least in the amount of the fair value of the rental of the wardrobe," he said.
He added that the law is clear that uniforms — "big brown suits with your name on them" — don’t qualify as income, but it would be hard to make the argument that fancy dress suits from Saks Fifth Avenue and Nieman Marcus are a uniform.
"Especially since Palin is employed by the state of Alaska and not the RNC," he said.
- jpt
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
Mrs Palin charged the state for her children to travel with her, including to events where they were not invited, and later amended her expense reports to specify that they were on official business.
The charges included costs for hotel and commercial flights for three daughters to join Mrs Palin to watch their father in a snowmobile race.
There was also a trip to New York for a five-hour conference which entailed the governor and her 17-year-old daughter staying for five days and four nights in a luxury hotel overlooking Central Park.
In total, the Republican vice-presidential candidate has charged the state $21,012 (£13,000) for her three daughters’ 64 one-way and 12 round trip airline flights since she took office in December 2006.
In some cases, she charged Alaska for hotel rooms for the girls, according to an investigation by Associated Press.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
If this is legal, why are you reporting it? Don’t we have real issues during this campaign that need to be reported on? Are you trying to just be an entertainer/fake news reporter????
Posted by: justme | October 22, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
When public officials travel it is usual for them to take family. Find a real issue to discuss.
Posted by: justme | October 22, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Investigative journalism. This is not a concern to me or my pocketbook, or my health or my children’s health welfare or livelihood. Try some investigative journalism on today’s issues regarding the campaign that will affect the average person.
Posted by: justme | October 22, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“When public officials travel it is usual for them to take family.”
But the state is not the one to foot the bill.
“Find a real issue to discuss.”
I consider ripping off taxpayers for personal financial gain by Palin to be a real issue.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Jake, get out of Sarah’s closet.
Posted by: Joe the Plumber | October 22, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Gov. Sarah Palin, already found by one investigation to have abused her power, will take time from her vice presidential campaign Friday to give a deposition in a second inquiry into her firing of the state’s top public safety official.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Jake-
Where is your report on the Obama’s $500 worth of Iranian caviar and champagne they got from room service at their hotel? Why don’t you keep to reporting on things people care about? I couldn’t give a hoot about the clothing OR the Obama’s eating habits.
Posted by: Mike | October 22, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
“Where is your report on the Obama’s $500 worth of Iranian caviar and champagne they got from room service at their hotel”
Never happened.
The Rupert Murdoch owned NY Post had to retract that BS story.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Sarah Palin is the 600 lb. gorilla in this presidential race right now. She’s a disgrace and totally ill-prepared, unqualified and unfit to serve as our nation’s vice president. A long line of distinguished conservatives have already also expressed their dismay with Palin and what it says about McCain’s judgment. Above and beyond everything else, it’s a knockout blow against the McCain/Palin ticket.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Yea, Governor’s LEGAL clothes are the hot issue of the day. Is this the best you can do?
Posted by: anybody | October 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Jake — why aren’t you tying all this together with:
- Palin’s charging the state for flying and housing her kids, as should only be done if they were part of “official business.”
- Palin charging the state to go to hubby’s snowmobile races
- Palin’s charging the state when she stays in her own home…
We’re not talking small potatoes here, but hundreds of thousands of dollars. This clothing story is part of a larger pattern of Palin getting rich of stupid things on the public dime.
Who knew pitbull lipstick was so expensive?
Posted by: Lettuce | October 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Mike and your caviar caveat:
Gee sport didn’t you read yesterday’s NY Post’s Page 6 apology? Mrs. Obama did NOT receive room service complete with caviar as she was not even staying at the hotel. Sorry you wingnuts are always a day late and a dollar short…
Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | October 22, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
In these economic times, Sarah goes shopping with $150,000 of campaign donations?
It’s just disgusting
Posted by: mary | October 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Jake, Get a life, I wish you would put this much effort into Obama’s background and all of his shananigans, but obviously you could care less. Who cares, so she has to declare the damn clothes. Have you people lost your minds?
Posted by: Kim | October 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Sounds plausible that it would be taxable. She is gaining value from it. Declaring an equivalent rental cost as income seems about right.
I wonder if she deducted expenses for clothing on her previous tax forms or not?
Well, at least we know that this campaign team really needs some professional tax advice. Good luck on getting any credible tax policy from McCain/Palin as this ticket truly is the ticket of tax delinquents.
-Cindy forgets to pay her taxes.
-Sarah underpays her taxes, takes bogus deductions, and fails to declare all her income.
-And then there’s newly adopted son, Joe the Plumber, who is delinquent on his taxes and doesn’t pay local licensing fees.
Heckuva job!
Posted by: Bud | October 22, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
If her suits were a typical family of four, they’d be getting a great tax break from Obama!!!!
Posted by: Tungsten | October 22, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Mike, Jake is reporting the facts, just the facts.
Posted by: Joe Friday | October 22, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
When are you going to comment on Josh Marshall’s bombshell? Jeff Larson, the guy who did the buying, is part of the firm that trashed McCain through robocalls in 2000 AND was later hired by McCain to trash Obama.
PLUS — he’s also the guy behind the sweetheart rental deal for Sen. Norm Coleman on his apartment in DC.
AND Kos has pointed out that the $150,000 in clothes was purchased at the same store where a different GOP operative bought all those fancy suits for Coleman, which he never declared as gifts either.
All told, it makes the GOP world either a very small world, or easily corruptable with small trifles, or just a bunch of shopaholic robocallers!
Posted by: Lettuce | October 22, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Jake, how about calling an immigration attorney now? Is an Indonesian citizen eligible to be President?
Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
When elected officials screw the taxpayers by making us foot the bill for everything for the whole family, it is a serious offense. Since when have kids been “requested” to officiate at official functions like meeting of governors etc. A thief, a liar and a cheat will always be found out – and Palin is again caught in the headlights. Add this to the Troopergate affair, then the $150k of clothing (supposedly burrowed!!! and I would like to meet this lender too!!!) and you can see what an unethical and dishonest personality this person is. Add her ignorance to the picture and you should be able to see another Mugabe or Abacha. Does this country need these types of characters, especially at this time of crisis??
Posted by: Karen | October 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I would be more upset over Obamas plane refurbishment or the fake “Greek Columns. Than clothes to wear on the campaign trail WHICH ARE LEGAL.
Posted by: WHITEY | October 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Where is your report on the Obama’s $500 worth of Iranian caviar and champagne they got from room service at their hotel
*******************************************
Sorry pal, this blog is for true stories only.
Go to the right wing blogs for the fabricated stories.
Posted by: Truth Matters | October 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Does Obama have to declare stories like this as campaign contributions from Jake Tapper and ABC News?
Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
hEY jAKE, do you want us to pick a president by who buys and spends what on clothes. How does this make any sense?
Posted by: me | October 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
IT IS AN ISSUE
When you run as a better than thou celebrity Alaskan, against the ‘good ol boys’ then hold yourself to your own standards.
‘PALIN THE SHOPPER’ is exploiting Joe the Plumber
Posted by: watching | October 22, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
McCain and Palin are both finished….
So all of this nitpicking around the edges is fun alright, but not really necessary.
John McCain now needs to make a decision on how he wants to go down and what kind of reputation he will have when he loses in a LANDSLIDE on November 4th.
Because at the rate he is going now, in addition to losing this election, he will also lose his Senate seat in Arizona next time it comes up!
Too bad John, you gave it a shot, but now it is time to go back to Arizona and retire. Also it is time for Palin to go back to Alaska and be impeached!!
And after all this is over, the only office Palin is going to get elected to is Dogcatcher in Wassilla!!!
Posted by: Davis | October 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Isn’t this a private matter between Sarah Palin and her accountant? Since when is ABC paying Jake Tapper to go into someone’s closet to see if they paid tax on the clothes someone bought for them? Is Obama paying taxes on his haircuts and shoes and clothes that I am darn sure the DNC is paying the bill for. My Gosh you guys need to get a grip. Pretty soon you will start investigating what Sarah Palin is eating for lunch to turn PETA against her. It is so sad. After 25 years of constantly watching ABC, I have been forced to delete it from my Cable Lineup because I just can’t stand it anymore. You people are so….. LAME! That is the cleanest thing I can say and I am 62 years old and you frustrate the heck out of me. Why don’t you change ABC to DNC and get it over with?
Posted by: Let the truth be told | October 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
The DNCC spent $140,000 on Obama’s Greek columns and podium at the Convention — where is the story on that?
Jake – your Palin obsession is a bit creepy.
Posted by: Dave | October 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Re: geevil
Glad that you are so smart that you can confuse Hawaii with Indonesia. As Palin was unable to even correctly answer a question from a third-grader, perhaps you could go back to the second grade and begin therein to better yourself. Geeeezzz, no wonder the country is in such poor shape when we have the likes of you, Palin and GW or McSame leading us. Get a real life man, and at the same time, educate yourself a little.
Posted by: Karen | October 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Who is paying for obana’s trip to Hawai’i to see his “sick grandmother”?
Who paid for his last trip to see his gm?
Who paid for his vacation..where he had to go to take a rest from the campaign?
Who paid for all the dresses that were such “fashion statements” (looked like she got them from Goodwill)? But, the media compared her to Jackie Kennedy.
Who paid for the children’s clothes?
The list goes on………..
What is right for one member of this campaign, being dem or rep, is good for all of them.
Posted by: Whoever | October 22, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
If she needs to pay the tax, pay it, but it is for next year, is it?
You don’t have to charge her now.
Posted by: aa | October 22, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
“Isn’t this a private matter between Sarah Palin and her accountant?”
Inappropriate gifts to a public official are a private matter?
Right wingers sure can play ostrich when they want to.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
When elected officials screw the taxpayers by making us foot the bill for everything for the whole family, it is a serious offense. ============== How stupid can you be??? The Republican Party is not paying with taxpayer money, they are paying with their money!!!
Posted by: Let the truth be told | October 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
The obvious solution to Gov. Palin’s clothing conundrum is to have the RNC embroider “Caribou Barbie” on the fronts of all the clothes, and to add a patch on all of the backs stating “Paid by the Republican National Committee.” It wouldn’t look any more ridiculous than she already does!
Posted by: chuck | October 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
All the right wingers roaring about this issue tells me its resonating.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Mike -
Why do you keep repeating a story that has been proven false…a story that the NY Post had to issue a retraction on?
Just me -
Coupled with the per diem nonsense and state sponsored family travel, this is a real story. The Palins enjoy living on other peoples’ dimes. Kind of undermines her Joe 6 pack, anti-good old boy, reformer, maverick rhetoric. This is precisely how the good old boys behave.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | October 22, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“How stupid can you be??? The Republican Party is not paying with taxpayer money, they are paying with their money!!! ”
That is for the $150,000 in clothing.
What the other poster is referring to is Palin charging the state for her kids travel.
“According to an Associated Press investigation, Palin used state money to fund her children’s travel to campaign events to which they were not invited.
And then later amended expense reports to say they were on official business.
The report says Palin charged the state $21,000 for her 3 daughters on 64 one-way and 12 round trips on commercial flights since she assumed office in December 2006.”
You would think in your 62 years that you would learn a thing or two and not be so easily duped by the right wing media.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Don’t worry, I am sure as creative as she is, Palin will find a way to avoid any tax payment. She has been able to make the Alaskan state pay for her kids’ numerous personal trips, after all.
Posted by: teddymaniac | October 22, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
So this is how we are going to pick a president. With all of Obama’s baggage, it comes down to the vp’s clothing and kids travel.
No wonder America is in the crapper.
Posted by: crapper | October 22, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Wow – Jake actually spent his investigative reporting time looking into the clothes Palin wears.
Jake, have you ever looked into the grades Obama received at the colleges he attended or how he paid for the colleges (and living expenses) or how Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when Pakistan was not allowing U.S. citizens to enter the country?
Posted by: Thelma | October 22, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“So this is how we are going to pick a president. With all of Obama’s baggage, it comes down to the vp’s clothing and kids travel.”
Most people have already made up their minds.
This is just more proof of Palin being a fraud.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Wah, wah, wah. The MSM, sniff, sniff, the MSM, sniff, the MSM is bad.
The whiners are really out in force.
The Palin apologists just can’t handle the truth that their new heroine is completely flawed.
She lies, she cheats on her taxes, and she can’t talk sensible about anything when asked a question.
These people have no hope and no clue. To paraphrase Harry Truman, you tell them the truth and they think it’s hell.
Posted by: Bud | October 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Where is your report on the Obama’s $500 worth of Iranian caviar and champagne they got from room service at their hotel? Why don’t you keep to reporting on things people care about? I couldn’t give a hoot about the clothing OR the Obama’s eating habits.
Posted by: Mike | Oct 22, 2008 4:01:07 PM
————————————–
Where is your report on the Obama’s $500 worth of Iranian caviar and champagne they got from room service at their hotel
*******************************************
Sorry pal, this blog is for true stories only.
Go to the right wing blogs for the fabricated stories.
Posted by: Truth Matters | Oct 22, 2008 4:10:00 PM
————————————-
Mike: We haven’t learned not to say anything about “The Messiah”, must remember he is “PERFECT”..does nothing wrong. He is the only one that can run for president of the USofA and not be a citizen, have such savory characters as friends, and associate with ACORN and it be just hunkey dorey. Oh, and be so special that a long time Republician, turn-coat General: Colin Powell endorse him. Wonder what he was promised. He needs to sit along side Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton for top offices in obana’s administration.
Posted by: Whoever | October 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Jake,
We should get a rundown of the exact prices are for each item….I am just curious..The Republican National Convention was Sept 1. So, if she wore a different outfit everyday until Oct. 30 that would be $2500 an outfit. Not bad for a hockey mom. This may all be irrevelant but it does go to the heart of the problem with Republicans and that is arrogance. I am sure the Republican party didn’t give it a second thought as to how this looked. And that is incredibily stupid given that they’ve made Joe Sixpack, Joe the Plumber, etc..the theme of their campaign…More questionable judgement…
Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Well I am really happy that we have this cleared up! Now I can sleep tonight knowing that Gov. Palin has to claim all of these new clothes on her 2009 taxes. Thanks goodness!
Posted by: Bruce | October 22, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Jake,
The false assumption is that the clothes have no practical value. They’re putting them up for charity auction. To assume that no one will bid on her items is ridiculous.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
GOTTA EAT: OBAMA CAMP SPENDS $437,144 ON FOOD… $21,500,862 ON POLLING
I wonder what the “practical value” of the $437k in food is when Obama returns it to the DNC?
Posted by: Joanna M | October 22, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Mike- That story has already been debunked and the Post has printed a retraction and an apology. Michelle did not even stay at that particular hotel. The room service receipt was a FAKE.
Stop the smears!
Obama-Biden ’08
Posted by: Leah | October 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Duping for money? Obama is the grand duper. Almost a billion dollars sucked away from the general economy and direct it to media spending. As a society, we put a down down payment of more than $500 million (the difference between his total haul and the $84 million public funding) to buy a socialist, whose price tag is still yet to be determined.
If Obama really cared about spreading the wealth, he should limit his spending to that of the would be public funding amount and then use the rest for charity.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | October 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Give me a break people. The RNC can spend their money on anything they want to acheive a win. How much trash TV and also the 30 minute air time going to cost Obama? When it comes to money RNC is running on a less $ spending compaign than Obama. I am still disgruntled that Obama went back on his word about campaign financing.
Posted by: Corey B | October 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
yawn. who cares. man i hate modern day politics and media. so tell me jake, what should she do? she’s not a millionaire like hillary. should she wear walmart clothes? why is this an issue. they obviously think that its important that she dresses sharp.
let me ask you a question. if she were the ceo of a large corporation do you think she would be expected to wear designer clothes and always look impressive. the answer is yes.
jake. cover real news! i dare you to respond to this.
Posted by: peter | October 22, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
First Troopergate… now ClothingGate… Hilarious!
Posted by: jcarob | October 22, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Wow, this is the lucky break that Senator Government needs to turn his tailspin around!
Great reporting Jake, this is an issue of critical national importance! I’m so proud of ABC News fulfilling their societal responsibility as our 4th Estate and not our 5th Column.
Posted by: Joanna M | October 22, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Sorry to say, but our hero Jake has caught the fungus.
Posted by: jcarob | October 22, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
WOW…it sure costs a lot to put lipstick on a family of pigs.
Posted by: algwriter | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Sarah Palin’s wardrobe cost more than four times the median salary of an American plumber ($37,514). She received more valuable clothes in one month than the average American household spends on clothes in 80 years.
Posted by: Vietnam Vet | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Food is considered an ordinary expense for both campaigns. It costs a great deal to feed workers, campaign staff and probably fundraisers.
Since it’s a normal business expense, it raises no questions for either campaign.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Barbie outfits are considered collectibles that increase in value over time.
Posted by: Membery | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
It’s not what was done, so much as how.
========================================
I disagree. $150,000 is extremely extravagant. And given that Republicans want to represent small town America it was extremely stupid. And the fact that Palin did not object says something about her as well. You khow she knew they were expensive. Just ask your wife, every woman knows the cost of designer clothes, shoes, purses, etc..So, it is the what as well as the how. If she was truly a hockey mom and everyday woman with five kids she’d be shopping at Target or WalMart and looking for sales..In the scheme of what is important in this race this issue doesn’t even register except to illustrate how incredibly stupid the Republican party has become that they didn’t realize the media and their opponents would jump all over this.
Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Let The Truth Be Told
Politico obtained RNC spending docs through the Freedom of Information Act. The expenses were part of these.
They also reviewed the Obama campaign docs and found no similar expenditures.
Posted by: This is SO Old | Oct 22, 2008 4:26:18 PM
—————————————
If this document was like all other documents and issues; they probably found a blank piece of paper. Or a document stating a zero balance. Those dems really do know how to do it; wonder where he destributed that part of the wealth.
Posted by: Whoever | October 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
“Wow, this is the lucky break that Senator Government needs to turn his tailspin around!”
ROFLMAO.
Obama leads in national polls, tracking polls, state polls, electoral college, campaign offices, campaign donations etc.
By every single measure he is winning this election.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Palin’s high-paid traveling make-up artist is Amy Strozzi, who was nominated for an Emmy Award for her work as head of makeup on “So You Think You Can Dance.”
Strozzi was paid $13,200 by the McCain-Palin campaign last month alone, according to the campaign’s latest financial disclosure report filed this week.
Posted by: blush | October 22, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I find that funds equivalent to a person’s home mortgage being spent on clothes offensive. But I have to wonder, how is this different than celebrities that walk the Red Carpet in borrowed dresses if indeed the RNC does own the wardrobe? What the RNC should do is hold a Fund Raising Auction for the clothes after the election and donate the proceeds to a charity. There have been similar events in the past for other high profile persons. Perhaps the raised monies could go to fighting Breast Cancer or helping Special Needs Children. Or, I suppose, back into the coffers of the RNC.
Posted by: NW Reader | October 22, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Sarah Palin’s wardrobe cost more than four times the median salary of an American plumber ($37,514). She received more valuable clothes in one month than the average American household spends on clothes in 80 years.
Posted by: Vietnam Vet | Oct 22, 2008 4:38:15 PM
————————————-
Thank you for your service in Vietnam!!
Remember we are hearing from the democraps. They stir up things to make ffolks angry; they don’t believe that they ever do anything wrong…they have “the messiah” in their corner.
Posted by: Whoever | October 22, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
If you went after Obama on his spending on his clothes, you’d be called a “racist.” When Obama was asked what brand of suit he wears, his campaign declined to answer, so we’ll never know. Jake why don’t you look into it? After all, President outranks Vice President.
Posted by: tina | October 22, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Jake,
So you have taken the time to call the tax lawyer to check on that too??? HILARIOUS!!! haha.
I can tell you are obsessed with Palin; because you know silly things like that fire up the Obama nut cases, haha.
More so, anything Palin does you make it sound sinister; but anything Biden does is “Oh Joe.”
If we believe the polls Obama will win; but if the polls are wrong and McCain win, oh boy…I can see many journalist including yourself getting into a huge depression and mute!
God bless America and its biases press! LOL
Posted by: Joe the reader | October 22, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
GEE; I AM SO SORRY THAT SARAH PALIN ONLY MAKES 120,000.00 PER YEAR AS GOVERNOR AND DOESN’T HAVE THE MEANS TO BUY FANCY CLOTHES LIKE MICHELLE OBAMA, WHOM GOT A A RAISE IN HER SALARY, PER HER HUSBAND’S SHADY DEALINGS IN CHICAGO, WHERE MICHELLE’S PAY WENT FROM 150,000.00 TO $350,000.00 ONCE HE BECAME SENATOR.
ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS THAT ALL GOVERNMENT FUNDING GIVEN TO ACORN, VIA MR. OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN, BETTER RETURN THAT MONEY TO US TAXPAYERS, OR YOU, MR. OBAMA WILL HAVE TO CLAIM THAT MONEY ON YOUR TAX RETURNS SINCE YOU USED IT FOR YOUR CAMPAIGN. END OF MESSAGE!!!!
Posted by: maagie | October 22, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Corey B
Yes, the RNC can pay for almost anything it wants in campaign expenses. But this is an issue because it slips through a loophole in McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. The McCain/Palin campaign itself cannot pay for the wardrobe.
The question that had arisen is that it is a coordinated campaign expenditure. Some say it shouldn’t be allowed, others say it should. It’s up to the FEC whether they will apply the law to these types of expenses.
For all campaigns in the future, it needs to be clarified.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Key to issue lack of judgment.
It is obscenely extravagant and a poor decision on that level.
It shows a certain lack of judgment and taste to spend that much to look that frumpy. The store must have loved getting rid of all that unflattering stuff.
Call the fashion police she’s a disaster.
Posted by: Rodger | October 22, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Jake, here’s the NYT’s The Caucus’s take on this :
” Jeff Larson is a prominent Republican consultant whose firm has been tied to the onslaught of negative robocalls from Senator John McCain’s campaign.
Mr. Larson was also the chief executive of the local host committee for the Republican National Convention.
Now it appears that Mr. Larson may have been the personal shopper for Gov. Sarah Palin’s lavish shopping spree — or at least he initially picked up the tab.
Federal Election Commission records show that Mr. Larson was reimbursed by the Republican National Committee in September for more than $130,000 in purchases at Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Macy’s, Barney’s New York, and Atelier New York, a men’s clothing store.
The spending spree, first reported by Politico.com, was apparently to outfit Ms. Palin and her family. Should she decide to keep the value of the clothing will have to be taxed as income. I.R.S. rules allow for employees to deduct the cost of uniforms worn for work — as long as the clothing has no use other than one’s job.
But if the same clothing can also be worn day-to-day, the cost cannot be deducted from income. And if paid for by someone else, as in this case, the value of the clothing must be reported as taxable income, Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice, a nonpartisan tax policy research group, said on Wednesday.
“If the clothes were only used for work, it would not be taxable income,” Mr. McIntyre said. “But if you can use them to go to lunch with your husband, it would.”
The Republican National Committee confirmed the reimbursements to Mr. Larson, but said that the clothing bought for Ms. Palin and her family would eventually be given to charity. Mr. Larson did not return messages left for him today at his business in Minnesota.
Apart from Mr. Larson, the McIntosh Company in Dallas, which appears to be a fund-raising firm run by Alison McIntosh, who has been identified in news reports as a fund raiser for the McCain campaign, was apparently reimbursed for $4,537 in purchases at Macy’s in Minneapolis, according to the commission records.
In addition, a woman by the name of Lisa Kline was reimbursed several hundred dollars for purchases made at high-end children’s stores in Minneapolis and New York.
The full shopping list for Ms. Sarah Palin and her family, according to records of the Federal Election Commission, looks like this:
• $75,062.63 spent at Neiman Marcus on Sept. 10.
• $41,850.72 to Saks Fifth Avenue in New York on Sept. 10.
• $7,575.02 to Saks Fifth Avenue in St. Louis on Sept. 10.
• $5,102.71 to Bloomingdale’s in New York on Sept. 10.
• $789.72 to Barney’s New York on Sept. 10.
• Charges of $4,396.94 and $512.92 at Macy’s in Minneapolis on Sept. 10.
• $4,537.85 to Macy’s in Minneapolis on Sept. 22.
• $349.50 to Lord & Taylor in New York on Sept. 25.
• $4,902.08 to Atelier New York, a men’s clothing boutique, on Sept. 10.
• Two separate charges of $98 to Pacifier, a high-end baby store in Minneapolis, on Sept. 10 and Sept. 25.
• $98.50 to Steinlauf & Stoller, a sewing supply store, in New York on Sept. 25.
• $133 to the Gap in Minneapolis on Sept. 25.
The money for the clothing came out of the budget of the Republican National Committee’s co-ordinated campaign fund, not the McCain campaign, an an important legal distinction, said Kenneth Gross, a campaign finance expert at Skadden Arps in Washington.
Had the money come from the McCain campaign, it would be a conversion of campaign funds into personal use, which is prohibited. The same rule does not apply to money from party committees.
“The R.N.C. is not made up of campaign money,’’ said Mr. Gross. “It’s not subject to the same restrictions as campaign money. The R. N. C. cleverly used the party committee’s money to avoid the liability that would have occurred if campaigns funds were used. It’s a fine line, but it separates what is legal from what is not.”
Posted by: julie | October 22, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Jake, you next owe us a story about Barack and Mechelle’s wardrobe, haircuts, stylist, makeovers, secretaries, assistants, bodyguards, etc. Fair remember. Are you an investigative journalist. You made a call to a tax attorney, keep going.
Posted by: seenohearno | October 22, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“When Obama was asked what brand of suit he wears, his campaign declined to answer, so we’ll never know.”
The above was bellowed by a right winger.
Below is an article with the truth
“When Sen. Obama steps onto the stage in Denver on Thursday night to accept the Democratic nomination for president, he plans to wear a classic two-button, navy, merino wool and cashmere suit from Chicago-based Hartmarx Corp., the company said. The largest suitmaker in the U.S. has sold suits to Obama over the years and, at the presidential hopeful’s request, sent two tailors to his Kenwood home earlier this month to custom-make a suit for the historic speech.
The company’s highest-end Hickey Freeman suit brand is made in Rochester, N.Y., but Obama opted for the Hart Schaffner Marx label made in Des Plaines at a union shop. The team made the suit in four days.
For those who scoff that pleats are out of fashion, let the record show that Obama’s pants were indeed pleated, with an inch-and-a-quarter cuff. (He has the height to carry them off, OK? And a 33-inch waist.) The suit would retail at a store such as Nordstrom for $1,500.”
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Regarding McCain and Palin:
Who would you hire? That is what we are about to do.Let’s look at the educational background of our two options: Obama:Occidental College (Los Angeles) – 2 years studying Politics and Public Policy. Columbia University (New York) – B.A. Political Science with a specialization in International Relations. Harvard Law School – Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna #### Laude, and also where he became the first African-American editor, of the Harvard Law Review. GPA = 3.89Biden: University of Delaware – B.A. in History and a B.A. in Political Science.Syracuse University College of Law – Juris Doctor (J.D.) GPA = 3.0
McCain:United States Naval Academy – Class rank 894 of 899.!!!!!! GPA = 2.53
Palin:Hawaii Pacific University – 1 semester.North Idaho College – 2 semesters – General Studies.University of Idaho – 2 semesters – Journalism.Matanuska-Susitna College – 1 semester.University of Idaho – 3 semesters – B.A. in Journalism. GPA = 1.89!!!! 1.89 thats about as low as you can go without failing.
John and Sarah both have the dubious distinction of being censured – McCain by the US Senate and Palin the Alaksa Senate for bad judgement – the only president and vp EVER in history to have that “qualification”!!
Add low grade points, minimal schooling, throw in some bad judgment and lies and you McCain supporters – should you win – are going to get the rudest awakening of your lives – YOU BETCHA!! – You just elected dumb, deceitful, slandering crooks to run our country.
Posted by: Johnnyr51 | October 22, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
She could wear Cindy’s cast-offs. The convention earrings alone could feed a Third World country for a year.
Posted by: obamamama | October 22, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Thank you for sharing and educating us on this spending spree. They could have used that money for some campaigning ads for McCain, rather than beautify Governor Sarah Drag Palin. Now we know how she runs things in Alaska. Is she related to Cheney and Rumsy? Oh, my bad, she’s a republican. “Big Spender.”
Posted by: khatts98178 | October 22, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
I guess the good part is she gets to claim them this year at a lower price tax than she would pay under Obama’s tax plan….unless he makes it retroactive….YIKES…LOL
Posted by: samhiguchi | October 22, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Whoever
Actually, they have all the expenses of both campaigns in detail.
Do some Googling, you’ll find a lot of information from both camps about their expenses. Such as media buys, direct mail expenses, food, airfare. You name it, they have both detailed it.
All campaigns are required to file campaign finance reports, including expenditures over $200.00 to the FEC.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Is she a violator of the Executive Branch Ethics code, or a clothesmoose?
Posted by: anchorage | October 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Barack and Michelle Obama had to buy a $2Million Dollar home and live in the upscale Hyde Park Neighborhood!
Seems to me, Little MIchelle Obama lied on the View earlier this year when she was asked about the black and white sun dress she had on. She said it came from Black and WHite store in CHicago. Liar! Liar! LIar!
I went there the next day to see this dress. They said the $142.00 dollar dress she said she got from there was not theres. In fact her dress is a $1,200.00 dress from a designer she uses here in Chicago.
SO Jake, why don’t you go check out her wardrobe!!!
Posted by: maggie | October 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Ah…Sorry To Bother
You, Mr. Obama, Sir…
Columbo Still Scratching His Head…
Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, sir. Um . . . know you are busy and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and . . . ah . . . I hate to bother you. I will only take a minute ok, sir?
See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.
Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says boy she wishes she had digs like this you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!
Oh, sorry sir. I didn’t mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island ? No, I didn’t think so. .
Well, listen, anyways, I can’t seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be ‘locked’ or ‘not available’. I’m sure it’s just some oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are . . . I . . I . . . have them written down here somewhere . . . oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I’ll just read it to you.
Could you help me please find these things, sir?
1. Occidental College records — Not released
2. Columbia College records — Not released
3. Columbia Thesis paper — ‘not available’
4. Harvard College records — Not released
5. Selective Service Registration — Not released
6. Medical records — Not released
7. Illinois State Senate schedule — ‘not available’
8. Law practice client list — Not released
9. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate – - Not released
10. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth — Not released
11. Harvard Law Review articles published — None
12. University of Chicago scholarly articles — None
13. Your Record of baptism– Not released or ‘not available’
14. Your Illinois State Senate records–’not available’
Oh hey . . listen! I know you are busy! Is this too much for you now? I mean tell you what. I will come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you are busy, so I will just let myself out. I will be back tomorrow. And the day after.
“Who wants to know these things?” asks Senator Obama.
Columbo answered:
THE PEOPLE
Posted by: Hero | October 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“I find that funds equivalent to a person’s home mortgage being spent on clothes offensive.”
I think all the real hockey moms and real plumbers out here agree with you.
Posted by: BMS in NC | October 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
It’s a stupid thing to do when you are running a populist, Joe Sixpack campaign, touting your outsider qualities.
But what do I know… I shop at Salvation Army.
Which reminds me, I’ll keep an eye out for Palin’s knee high boots in the shoe bin next time I go shopping.
I hear she is going to give them to charity…. so you know some lucky scrub is going to pay 4 bucks for a pair of 5000$ gogo boots.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“How often does the average person eat like this? Or is it only those who make $250,000 or more? Or only the 95% of the population laboring under the illusion that they will get tax breaks under the Obama Wealth Redistribution Plan?
Click here to see the receipt for the lunch that you paid for”
NY Post:
“THE source who told us last week about Michelle Obama getting lobster and caviar delivered to her room at the Waldorf-Astoria must have been under the influence of a mind-altering drug. She was not even staying at the Waldorf. We regret the mistake, and our former source is going to regret it, too. Bread and water would be too good for such disinformation.”
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
She gave us a hint when she made a sorry rhetoric regards lipstick on a pig. She sure has some porks for those expensive lipsticks.
Posted by: khatts98178 | October 22, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Next on tap:
The special deal Obama received on his house purchase: via Resko (who he “pals” around with)! Also, the huge loan Obama took out on the house and special deal (boneheaded).
Posted by: tina | October 22, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
I agree with Hero. Get to some real issues, Jake!!!! Write about something that matters.
Posted by: Joan H. | October 22, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Not for Obama,
that Michelle story was false, as you should know by now. This what The New York Post had to publish testerday:
“THE source who told us last week about Michelle Obama getting lobster and caviar delivered to her room at the Waldorf-Astoria must have been under the influence of a mind-altering drug. She was not even staying at the Waldorf. We regret the mistake, and our former source is going to regret it, too. Bread and water would be too good for such disinformation.”
So please stop spreading lies, and this BS story among them.
Posted by: keith | October 22, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
THANK YOU FOR THE COMBAT ZONE IN CHICAGO
CAN’T BLAME THE REPUBLICANS, BECAUSE THERE AREN’T ANY
STATE PENSION FUND $44 BILLION IN DEBT, WORST IN THE NATION.
COOK COUNTY (CHICAGO) SALES TAX 10.25%, HIGHEST IN THE NATION.
CHICAGO SCHOOL SYSTEM ONE OF THE WORST IN THE NATION.
THIS IS THE POLITICAL MACHINE THAT OBAMA COMES FROM IN ILLINOIS .
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
But, if the suits (which comprise a portion of the $150K) are exclusively for use in the campaign, are they not 100% deductible?
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | October 22, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
“When you loan something to someone can you call it a ‘loan’ if, upon its return, it has no practical value?”
No practical value?
Put the cloths on EBay and make $300,000 if McCain/Palin lose or make $500,000 if McCain/Palin win.
Posted by: GreggW | October 22, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Hero: Hope Andy makes his announcement before obama gets there. Sure he will be to busy with his sick gramdmother to worry about what Andy has to say. HA.
If Andy’s findings are like all the others they will be buried.
Posted by: Whoever | October 22, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Hero: I am with you!!!!! Heh!, Mr. Obama where is your real Birth Certificate? How come you and your goons won’t present your case to a law suit that has be filed against you and your campagin. You keep stalling and trying to overtake the suit. If, in fact, Mr. Obama is truly a citizen of the United States, why then won’t you guys come clean with this Hawaiian Birth Cetificate.
I HATE TO SAY THIS, BUT I THINK THIS IS THE OCTOBER SURPRISE…MR. BARACK OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. HE HAS BEEN LYING THIS WHOLE TIME. HE WAS NOT BORN IN HAWAII, HE PROBABLY WAS BORN IN KENYA.
OH! MY GOD. WHAT ARE THE OBAMAMANIACS GOING TO DO????
Posted by: maggie | October 22, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
“The special deal Obama received on his house purchase: via Resko (who he “pals” around with)! Also, the huge loan Obama took out on the house and special deal (boneheaded).”
Obama received no special deal, did not buy his house for Rezko and did not get a loan from Rezko.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | October 22, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
GreggW….
Put the close on ebay and make a half a million dollars…
Didn’t Palin do that with a jet? The state of Alaska lost money on that deal.
No wonder the economy is in such bad shape… People have crazy ideas about economics.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
ONCE AGAIN
Birth issues for both candidates have been debunked or dismissed by multiple sources. The original source of the Obama bc issue has been widely discredited.
McCain probably has no issues because the entire Senate in April voted unanimously in a non-binding resolution that he is considered a natural born citizen. The resolution makes it unlikely that the Supreme Court will overturn his eligibility.
Can we stop with these topics now?
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
PS: Neiman Marcus and other purveyors of couture clothing (Saks) have a 100% no questions asked, no time limit return policy. (Unlike Macy’s or Ross, purveyors to the carriage trade extend special perks.)
So your assumption that the clothes by November 4 would have no value is wrong.
They can be returned by the RNC for full value.
Trust me. Call NM.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | October 22, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“I went there the next day to see this dress. They said the $142.00 dollar dress she said she got from there was not theres. In fact her dress is a $1,200.00 dress from a designer she uses here in Chicago.”
Republican’s are poor losers !
For Pete’s sake… Don’t you see a pattern here with Palin…
Her habits with declarations, the so-called ‘friends’ that helped Tod build the house….
Maverick, give me a break…
Posted by: CLabs | October 22, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Who cares about Sarah Palin? Not me. Stop printing articles about because nobody cares.
Posted by: helen | October 22, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
But somehow, I do believe you spend a lot of money bidding for used women’s garments on ebay….
So, maybe there is money in putting Palin’s clothes on ebay.
Maybe we can fix the economy by having Palin try on clothes and sell them to lonely Republicans.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I’d laugh if this wasn’t such a possibility. What will America do when the media will denounce any criticism of a President as racist?
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Stephen Gianelli…
Are you suggesting she take the clothes and wear them and then return them for full refund?
My sister got in trouble for doing that when she was in high school.
But I suppose anything goes when you have God on your side, right?
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
I just went to the post office, and hadn’t been for a few days, so the mail piled up. Just a few days though. There were four–count ‘em, FOUR–requests for money from Obama & surrogates (Biden, Kennedy, & Michelle O). They just raised $150 million dollars and they are begging for more money?! What the hell is this guy planning to do, plaster his face all over every tree in the country? I am already so sick of looking at him. And we wonder how he raises all this money–the harass people until they finally donate. It’s even more idiotic, because I have sent EVERY SINGLE REQUEST back, for months.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
hero, Andy Martin is a certified nut job. Seriously — certified!! Quit wasting your time with this freak.
Posted by: hang | October 22, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Wait till you see her makeup bill…
it’s up there with McCain’s.
Between the two, they spend about 20,000$ a month on makeup.
That’s one heck of a pitbull, there.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Sarah Palin aka Caribou Barbie is showing America how to spread the wealth period
Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
On the education record, lets just say that some of our finest presidents had very little education. One that comes to mind is Abraham Lincoln and Washington. In this election you have to base your decision on experience. Both McCain and Palin are qualified based on what they have managed to accomplish. Wow Palin could not answer a question on McCain’s history of voting and she is labelled as dumb. Talk about her record and what she has accomplished.
Obama scares me because in actuality we have no idea what we are going to get except many foolish ideas that cost alot of tax dollars to implement. Who will pay for this? We will….
Think of it Obama, Pelosi, Reed in charge….wow this is freightening.
Posted by: Corey B | October 22, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Not for Obama:
It’s called campaign fund-raising and after its all over if there’s anything left you can bet someone needy and deserving will benefit from Obama’ and the Democrats generosity.
Surely if the Repubs were as well funded or even ahead in the polls you wouldn’t be whining – you’d be gloating.
Posted by: Johnnyr51 | October 22, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Not for Obama…
I am an Obama supporter… but I never got a single donation request in the mail.
Maybe those are bills or something.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
OMG -
Between these clothes, the per diems, and the state-financed travel for her family — all of which, some tax lawyers say, should be treated as income — this could really prove a personally extremely expensive campaign for Palin.
Posted by: herald | October 22, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
ABC, NBC, MSNBC IF you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You’re just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it’s time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a NEWSSOURCE IN AMERICA.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
How much did McCain’s pit bull spend on her lip stick?
Posted by: geevill | October 22, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Oh my God, now you’re suggesting that Sarah Palin RETURN the clothes after she’s worn them? Can it get any trashier?
You love Wal-Mart Sarah. You’re a regular Walmart girl. My daughter and I, who really are regular Americans, wear thrift store clothes. Sarah Palin is so out of touch with regular Americans that she doesn’t realize that most people in the lower 48 don’t shop at Saks. And is it just me, or is there something really creepy about a woman who doesn’t have enough self-respect that she lets somebody else dress her? A Republican operative. no less. What did he do? Decide on his perfect fantasy girl? Yuck. There have been some women politicians with questionable taste, but at least they could dress themselves and speak for themselves.
Posted by: mara | October 22, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
OK Jake, time for something hard hitting. We have spent too much time on this non-issue already. Now on to something hard hitting. What do we need to discuss? ACORN, Wealth Redistribution? Suggestions?
Posted by: helpme | October 22, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
What’s the difference between a Pit Bull and a Hockey Mom?
You can feed a pit-bull for 483 years with 150 grand.
Posted by: woof | October 22, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
how do you donate makeup and hair services to charity that have already been “rendered”? Makes Edwards & his $400 haircut look like a cheapskate.
Posted by: knelson | October 22, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Still cheaper than Mitt Romney’s hair products.
The GOP is saving money here…
Posted by: nails | October 22, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
It’s too bad we have to send money to get a good candidate elected….
but you basically have millions of small donors who HAVE to send money to compete with the handful of wealthy special interests that bankroll the GOP.
That’s why people donate to Obama. It’s not a scam. We just know that Obama was going to be smeared aggressively… and since we need a better future than the one McCain is offering… sending a hundred bucks to Obama isn’t really a big deal.
I mean, it’s basically either that, or watch our savings, jobs, debts, and healthcare costs drag us into oblivion.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
What you sneering critics in the liberal MSM fail to see here is… a Jobs Program! Saks floorwalkers, cashiers, a team of sweating porters to haul the merchandise from the store to the motorcade… chiropractors to treat those porters. Sarah Palin knows how to create jobs!
Posted by: J.O.B.S | October 22, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and THE MEDIA swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.
Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards’s own adultery for many months.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Only 25 percent of Obama donors make donations under $200. Most of Obama donors are rich people. This was revealed this morning in the Washington Post. Obama lied about this throughout the campaign, make fools of his own supporters.
Posted by: tina | October 22, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Maggie – My brother works in retail. The dress cost just a little over $100 dollars, if it wasn’t in the store you went to, maybe it was sold out, and there are photgraphs which shoe the dress Mcihelle Obama was wearing, ads for the dress, and the price. It did not cost $1200. The is what is called a lie.
Posted by: mara | October 22, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
The Gfk survey is an outlier… the most reliable poll out there is Rasmussen.
Rasmussen uses the largest sample of the regular tracking polls.
But Rasmussen is a Republican, and the poll always tilts slightly Republican…
But Rasmussen has a good history.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Bill O’Reilly was on The View today.
On the subject of Sarah Palin, O’Reilly said that he doesn’t know why she won’t come on the show.
“I want her to come in,” O’Reilly said. “I have outfits she can wear.”
LOL
Posted by: meow | October 22, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Nope… Most of Obama’s supporters are not rich people.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Martin has been labeled a vexatious litigant by numerous federal and state courts. He is barred from filing suit in Federal Court in Connecticut because of this. This is going back to 1983.
He accused GW of using cocaine during the 2000 election. In 2003, he claimed that he had found Saddam Hussein. He earned a law degree from the Univ. Of Il in 1969, but was denied a license to practice law in 1973. The Ill. Supreme Court cited troubling conduct on his part.
The FL Republican Party in 1996 denounced him when they found out he had renamed his 1986 campaign the “The Anthony R. Martin-Trigona Congressional Campaign to Exterminate Jew Power in America”
You guys still want to back this guy? The Republicans don’t want anything to do with him.
Posted by: This is SO Old | October 22, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Isn’t there a story here? Doesn’t journalism require that you who produce our NEWS, tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren’t you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. “Housing-gate,” no doubt. Or “Fannie-gate.”
Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Why didn’t Giuliani lend Palin some of his charming dresses?
Posted by: kurt | October 22, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
In the end, it doesn’t matter what she wears.
I think people enjoy the irony. After ridiculing Edwards for a 400$ haircut… this is like Edwards on meth.
The Republicans have been sowing this sort of phony populism all year long…
And, now they get to reap the fruits.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
There is concern about Pelosi I, die hard Oabamite. But can ANYTHING really be worse than 8 years of Bush and Cheney? Really, Pelosi would have to
fight an undeclared war and wreck our banking system, curtail freedoms of Patriotic Americans and use waterboards to even come close.
Posted by: Johnnyr51 | October 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
JOURNALISM HAS DIED
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“Only 25 percent of Obama donors make donations under $200. Most of Obama donors are rich people. This was revealed this morning in the Washington Post. Obama lied about this throughout the campaign, make fools of his own supporters.”
According to the FEC reports 50% of Obama’s contributions are $200 or less.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
That is how America thinks about woman?
Too expensive?
You may change your mind when their wives have to protect these liberals.
Posted by: jy2008 | October 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“I think people enjoy the irony. After ridiculing Edwards for a 400$ haircut… this is like Edwards on meth.”
How many days did FoxNews spend on that?
We should look up what they said then as the now dismiss this story.
The irony is indeed delicious.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
YES WE CAN!!
and in 13 more days we will be saying
YES WE DID!!!
Obama/Biden/08
Posted by: Kathy | October 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
This IS a story…
It’s got a bit of a “man bites dog” element to it.
Joe Hockey Sixpack Plumber Mom from Outside of Washington just spent 150,000$ on clothes.
And then, the whole coverup bit, is also amusing: They are “borrowed” clothes! We are giving them to charity! Everyone knows she had no intention of keeping them!
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
I have one question for any honest republicans: If Obama, Biden or their spouses had purchased $150,000 worth of clothes at high-end “elitist” department stores and $50,000 worth of makeup and then charged the tab to the DNC, would you still argue that it’s not a big deal and that everyone should just leave the them alone? Not likely at all. In fact, Faux News would be hyperventalating and running the story 24/7, with updates on “Shopping-spree-gate” on the hour.
Posted by: AppeaseThis | October 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Her wardrobe may give a whole new meaning to the phrase the Devil wears Prada. It looks like if taxes aren’t pad she might want to consult Martha Stewart on cellular decorating.
Posted by: bhciapol | October 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
And the GOP was talking about Edwards $400 Haircut? Isn’t that nice, it can only get better if she gets into the White House right? Then she can be like Condy, and go Shoe Shopping while natural disasters are happening like in Louisiana. Looking to those boys she is….
Posted by: solsenz | October 22, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Obama came onto the scene comparing himself to the late great Abraham Lincoln, penned a book that some claim isn’t even his and arranged—or had arranged—Grade 8 textbooks with an entire chapter dedicated to him.
Lincoln was a humble man. He did not compare himself after six months in office to great men from history.
Swooning supporters, some at the ready to fall into a faint, accord the senator a peculiar rock star status. MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews admitted that an Obama presidential debate speech created a “thrill” in his leg.
The tragicomedy of Obama as “The Messiah” includes an advance to the White House with a largely AWOL mainstream media, who having come up empty on Sarah Palin in Alaska–one outlet even after advertising that they’d pay for provable dirt–are now vetting Joe the Plumber, rather than Obama sidekick Bill Ayers, the unrepentant terrorist bomber, who launched the senator’s career in his living room.
It would seem that Obama cannot lose for winning.
Already making a game plan with his “transition team” and unruffled that his wife snacked on lobster tails and Iranian caviar last week, Obama is already USA President without a single vote having been cast.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
The RNC clearly stated that the clothes would be given to charity. After Sarah Palin has worn them I can think of only one good use for them, give them to some homeless person to sleep on.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | October 22, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
The RNC should auction them on ebay.
Posted by: Laura | October 22, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Ryan,
Of course you are right… but they don’t think twice about barfing up a fake statistic to prove their claims.
There was a time when conservatives had a strong reputation for discipline, integrity, and intelligence. I know, I used to be one!
But once they worked their way into the majority party… they got sloppy and dumb… like the Democrats when Reagan took office.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Jake, any idea what Alaskan taxpayers have paid so far for dressing the Palin family?
We know by now that they paid a LOT for the family’s travels to snowmachine races etc.
Posted by: hawkeye | October 22, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
what is this 150 thousand for clothes what hocky mom walmart did she shop in—must have been a superstore.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s $150,000 makeover may raise her tax bill.”
Not too smart.
Ever thought about that someone else buys house for you instead of yourself?
Posted by: yetlost | October 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Duh… that’s the whole point of having a transition team.
It is to prepare, while you are running, for the possibility that you will win.
McCain has a transition team. As long as I can remember, Presidential candidates have had some form of transition team.
How can you blame Obama for having a transition team? If he didn’t I would be worried. It would mean that he would come to office totally unprepared.
I know in some circles ignorance is highly valued… but it is dangerous quality to look for in a president.
Posted by: blip | October 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
She definitely ain’t sporting a small town woman’s wardrobe. She should have done her shopping in Wasilla and supported the local economy. What a snob! Typical Republican hypocrit.
Posted by: Laura | October 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
How did Obama break all records in fundraising in a massive economic meltdown?
Even for someone whose ego is bigger than his ears, the pre-election gloating of Obama and friends is unprecedented.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
This is just say Palin is a regular person as us. Obama is different from us, he got the money from Rezko.
Posted by: kerry | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
So all the stars who borrow clothes for the Oscars or movie premieres have to count them as income? Hey, I am no tax expert, but…I dunno.
Posted by: Wade | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Sarahcuda doesn’t have to declare her clothes “income” any more than the campaign has to declare contributions “income.” It’s “political speech” which is protected.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
what is this 150 thousand for clothes what hocky mom walmart did she shop in—must have been a superstore.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
There’s more, of course. Palin charged the state for her children to travel with her, including to events where they were not invited, and later amended expense reports to specify that they were on official business.
The charges included costs for hotel and commercial flights for three daughters to join Palin to watch their father in a snowmobile race, and a trip to New York, where the governor attended a five-hour conference and stayed with 17-year-old Bristol for five days and four nights in a luxury hotel.
In all, Palin has charged the state $21,012 for her three daughters’ 64 one-way and 12 round-trip commercial flights since she took office in December 2006. In some other cases, she has charged the state for hotel rooms for the girls.
Posted by: boohoohoo | October 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
“Of course you are right… but they don’t think twice about barfing up a fake statistic to prove their claims.
There was a time when conservatives had a strong reputation for discipline, integrity, and intelligence. I know, I used to be one!”
The people posting lies here are not conservatives, they are the worst of reactionary right wingers easily led by their media.
Conservatives will argue facts and ideology in a straight forward manner. That is their nature.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
GMAB JAKE
THINK COSTUME……
Duds fior show that go back on the rack….
This is what you all are worrying about with 15 days tgo..
PATHETIC…..
BTW – don’t use that guy to do your pseronal taxes — you will certainly be spreading the wealth – YOURS.
Posted by: few | October 22, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I can only imagine how much Palin’s “expenses” will cost the American taxpayers if the McCain ticket wins….Johnny Mac will have to double the taxes for all Joe-Six-Pack-Plumbers out there.
Posted by: Kate | October 22, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
we all know palin is miss piggy—THE QUEEN OF PORK-SHE CAN WEAR CLOTHES WHEN CROSSING THE BRIDGE TO NO WHERE
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Does Obamarama have to declare his campaign plane and crew “income”?
He is using that plane to go to Hawaii for personal reasons. Is THAT “income”?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
No matter how bad the information Obama just slides by – smiling that weird little smirk of his.
It’s like it’s already a done deal.
But there are so many people who do NOT want him as president – will the machines be rigged?
Is it indeed a fait accompli? If so why? how?
They were talking about how taxes will be going up today, for everyone if he gets into office – except, of course the hedge fund managers – hmmm G. Soros? source of much of O’s money – what are they up to now – but what a wonderful surprise – and party we can have if things actually work the way they are supposed to – the real polls are neck and neck – soooooo?
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“And it also strengthens my faith because I know at the end of the day putting this in God’s hands, the right thing for America will be done, at the end of the day on Nov. 4.”
– Gov. Sarah Palin, in a radio interview with James Dobson.
Posted by: HELP!!! | October 22, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Rodney – The “regular American/hockey Mom” shopped at Neiman Marcus and Saks. Maybe hockey Moms who send their kids to very elite prep schools shop there too. But the soccor Mom I know either a) wear hand-me-downs b) shop at Target or c) shop Walmart, which I thought was good-old-girl Sara’s favorite store and represented all that was right about America.
Posted by: mara | October 22, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“This is just say Palin is a regular person as us. ”
This is laughable…
- She is just another pork queen…
- She abused her office for straing a personal vendetta.
- She charged Alaska with phony bill’s
- 150.000,- on dresses, makeup, hair
Posted by: CLabs | October 22, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
==Its clearly a cut and paste of an article. ==
Where does it make “clear” clear?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Chris in TX, I saw that video, I think on the Daily Show. LMAO. McCain’s got way to many skeletons in his own closet to be pointing fingers.
Posted by: Daisy | October 22, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Steve Forbes finally said it. “As long as BO is polling high, the markets will continue to fall because of his tax this tax that and spend here, spend there.”
The media should be rounded up and disposed of as toxic waste. They have brought this virus upon his.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
MARA
HOPE YOU WERENT TOO SURPRISED—my biggest problem with her is she seems to be a little dipsy—-probably never was at a soccer game.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Michelle Obama said use the rebate check money for earrings.
Barak Obama wore a 30,000 suit in berlin at his rally.
Obama went to a gym at a ritz instead of seeing our soldiers in germany.
Have you ever seen Obama’s suits they aren’t off the rack.
Joe Biden got a 4 million dollar compound at half price from the credit card industry executive where his son is a millionaire lobbyist.
Posted by: Jeff | October 22, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Help us get our country back. Vote for John McCain.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
wish i could email all the palin pictures i have recieved—-palin is no soccer mom.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Obama gave 800 K to Acorn.
Obama gave 14 million in earmarks to rezko then got help buying a 1.6 million dollar home while rezko was under federal investigation.
Obama gave millions in earmarks to michelle obama’s employer and her salary was doubled.
Obama’s campaign manager did a job for 200 K kicking people out of the ER room at Michelle’s hospital.
Obama got a sweetheart deal on his mortgage from a fellow board member at Michelle’s hospital.
Posted by: Dan | October 22, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
“The media should be rounded up and disposed of as toxic waste.”
Gotta love those right wings calls for violence.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
”
Years from now, I think we will appreciate the similarities between Abraham Lincoln and Barack Obama:
Both studied law.
Both were tall and lanky.
Both were senators from Illinois.
Both spoke with eloquence.
Both faced a divided nation in crisis.
Both had to deal with an unpopular war.
Both were portrayed as monkeys in political cartoons.
Both were hated by racists.
Both were among the best Presidents in U.S. History.
”
I sincerely hope so.
Not something like
Old fish is still old fish.
Lipstick pig is still pig.
You do not have to HATE THAT MUCH fishes and piges.
Posted by: jy2008 | October 22, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Sarah’s gotten herself into more scandals in two months, and better ones to boot, than the Clintons managed to inflict upon themselves over eight years. And she’s the heir apparent to the Rovian-controlled Chucklebuckle base of the GOP, now deserted by the GOP intellectuals and bona fide conservatives? Lotsa luck in 2012, folks.
Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | October 22, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Once again the little dog (a pit bull pup, maybe?) pulls the curtain back to reveal the charlatan(s) working the levers. This wardrobe story is so classic GOP–always yanking those levers of class division while in private they snuffle in the trough and laugh at the yokels they’re conning. Amazing that more people don’t see the con behind the “common folks” approach they always try to sell.
Every time you listen to Palin doin’ her common thing, remember she’s secretly laughing at your gullibility.
Posted by: dmw | October 22, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“Help us get our country back. Vote for John McCain.”
LOL
Our country has been in the GOP’s hands for 8 years in a row. They almost managed to ruin it.
8 years has been enough, more than enough.
Posted by: steveH | October 22, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
The RNC clearly stated that the clothes would be given to charity.
========================================
Be assured that $150,000 worth of designer clothes will not be donated to Goodwill or similar charities. It probably go to some needy CEO instead…
Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Help Us Get Our Country Back. John McCain win.
and so it is.
Jah
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
I’m sure Michelle Obama shops at Wal-Mart, that why she is “among 10 best dressed women: People magazine!!”
Posted by: democrats4life | October 22, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“Obama gave millions in earmarks to michelle obama’s employer and her salary was doubled.”
Michelle Obama received a raise in 2005.
In 2006 Obama requested a million dollar earmark for a pavillion at the hospital and it was rejected.
“Obama’s campaign manager did a job for 200 K kicking people out of the ER room at Michelle’s hospital.”
This program alleviated emergency room overcrowding by getting people with routine ailments to go to local clinics. They even shuttled people there.
“Obama got a sweetheart deal on his mortgage from a fellow board member at Michelle’s hospital.”
No he did not.
The Obamas had no prior relationship with Northern Trust when they applied for the loan.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Hey what’s wrong with Wal Mart. They have really nice clothes.
Posted by: ll | October 22, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
The idiocy of liberals knows no bounds. You actually care about this? What a bunch of morons.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Having been accused of being liberal (though I am more anti-Republican than liberal) I will say that I don’t care except that it illustrates the hypocrisy and stupidity of the Republican party not to see how this would play out in the media. It makes them appear to phony. I tend to believe that it is not just an appearance but that they really are phony..
Posted by: indy_voter | October 22, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
i get my clothes at the thrift store—-desighner clothes less than wallyworld prices
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
what she gonna do now? busted for using taxpayer’s money to float her kids across the country on “business”. what do the kids have to do with “business? she’s a flat foot liar.
Posted by: .mary. | October 22, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
America, I think you are the best country on earth. I trust you to do the right thing. John Mccain will win. America you know what to do.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Sarah, Paris Hilton called while you were out, she wants her ditzy-pampered-spoiled rotten-rock star image back.
Posted by: John | October 22, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
john
dont you dare pick on paris—–SHE DOES A MEAN CARWASH—-
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
MAVERICK’ED AGAIN!!!!
Posted by: mm | October 22, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Who’s a bigger maverick? McCain or Palin?
Posted by: mm | October 22, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Do the right thing America
do the right thing
Do the right thing journalist do the right thing.
Do the right thing America.
Jah
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
wow. the media is playing a very big part in the eventual collapse of our country. THIS IS NEWS?? how much more can the media bash mccain and palin on stories like this? i am starting to honestly HATE this country.
Posted by: tim | October 22, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I wonder if Alaska is going to begin an investigation into her using taxpayers money to fly her children around.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
tim me boy,you are just hanging out with the wrong party.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Hey “Not For Obama”, are you trying to convince yourself, because others are ignoring your idiotic rant!
Posted by: Kimo_Pono | October 22, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I did not vote (early voting in FL) for Obama or Mccain but I am sick of the media attacking this women. The media should be the TIME person of the year for it’s lousy political coverage. Nader/Gonzalez 08
Posted by: Tina | October 22, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Spending $150,000 on clothes, hair, and makeup is NOT conservative!
Posted by: Amy | October 22, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Do you all know what is TRULY scary?
McCain without the make-up.
Posted by: hank | October 22, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
America thank you for always being here and remaining undiminished in your beliefs, having the integrity stand with each other.
Do the right thing America.
You know who is right for this country between these two men.
You know who loves you and has fought for you.
McCain will win because America will do the right thing.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
150,000 is that all ,she looks like a million bucks to me !!!
Posted by: joe | October 22, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
joe
or one very well dressed moose.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
A letter from a Democrat for McCain:
I have lived in my neighbor for 37 years and I can not even put up a yard sign. If I do put one up it will be knocked down and my car damaged. At work I have just reached the point I just have to tell people that I have not made up my mind. My son and daughter are both Obama supporters and they barely call us anymore. We are up in our years and I just had to tell them to stop lecturing us as we are old enough to think for ourselves.I will be so glad when this is over, but I still believe that Obama will be defeated. He scares me and I do believe that he will be a danger to America. If he is so lucky to win there will be a generated crisis and only God knows where that would take us.
DO THE RIGHT THING AMERICA, DO THE RIGHT THING. IN YOUR GUTS YOU KNOW THAT OBAMA IS NUTS.
Posted by: Not For Obama | October 22, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
ROFLMAO.
The NRCC has pulled funding for Michelle Bachmann in the wake of her discusting comments last week.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
“From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” — Karl Marx
“Share the wealth.” — Barack Obama
All you need to know in order to decide on NOvember 4.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Not For Obama
150,000 is a 3 years worth of work for some people. I guess McCain turned out to be running for celebrity in chief. He wears expensive close also. At least the Obamas have the decency to shop at the Gap.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Some Democrats are certainly guilty of merely faultfinding McCain/Palin in order to prove their point. But Republicans… wow. I think we have a serious problem in our educational system. It seems that it’s rare to find a thoughtful comment from a Republican on just about any thread. I mean, the only things I read that are civil and are worth anything come from disaffected Republicans who’ve thrown in the towel. Sad.
Posted by: Darnelle | October 22, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Abraham Lincoln was a republican.
Posted by: rrrrr | October 22, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“OBAMA WOULD NOT BOTHER TO SALUTE YOUR FLAG OR WEAR ITS PIN.”
Obama wore a flag pin at all 3 debate.
McCain did not wear at flag pin at any of the debates.
I guess John McCain hates America according to right wing logic.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Mr. Incredible
Your ignorance is showing. According to the argument Bush 2, Clinton, Reagan, Bush 1, Carter, Nixon, Ford are all socialist. I count more socialist republicans then democrats. McCain is also on that list.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Does this violate FEC regulations? Only if Palin intended on keeping the clothes — which she doesn’t. The RNC made clear that the outfits will go to charitable donations, and one might imagine that they could generate some hefty bids if placed for auction after the election. She won’t keep any of it, unless she buys it back from the RNC.
Isn’t the real point that Sarah Palin is a true middle class person who doesn’t regularly shop at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue, such that the GOP had to actually buy her this stuff? Unlike everyone else in this race on both sides, she actually IS one of “us.”
Posted by: Kirsten Powers | October 22, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
O, the hypocrisy of Republicans… This isn’t an issue, they say.
Well, Democrats have not forgotten the hateful remarks by conservative commentators about John Edwards’ $400 haircuts.
Hillary, who like Palin often changed outfits several times in a day of campaigning, was heavily criticized in 2006 (senatorial campaign) for two hair-styling sessions that cost about $3,000.
Now look what Miss Wasilla is spending on her hairdo and clothing…
Pork barrel spending, that’s what it is.
Posted by: beef | October 22, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
rrrrr
Abraham Lincoln was a republican, but the republicans of that era split into to which conservatives and liberals.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Hope Ditto, Arnab Datta, and Ferdous Alfaruque Report:
Facing criticism from John McCain that his tax plan constitutes “welfare,” Barack Obama recently added a work requirement to one of his proposals.
“They started saying this was welfare,” said Obama adviser Austan Goolsbee. “So, just so they would absolutely not be able to say that, we decided that for the last two percent we’ll simply add a work requirement.”
Goolsbee discussed the change to Obama’s universal mortgage credit while debating McCain adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin at the Council on Foreign Relations on Tuesday.
The purpose of Obama’s 10 percent universal mortgage credit is to aid taxpayers who do not itemize when filing taxes. The Obama campaign estimates that it would provide an average of $500 to 10 million homeowners, the majority of whom earn less than $50,000 per year.”
Yet another example of the Obama campaign waltzing around the McCain campaign flailing attacks.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Mr Incredible do you think a progressivae tax rate is socialist?
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Hmmm….. I think I am beginning to understand why ABCnews is losing so many readers and viewers. This is really stupid!!
Posted by: Karen Dunlap | October 22, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
that tells me all i need to know dumber than a box of rocks ….still laughing
Posted by: joe | October 22, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Not For Obama
His Donors paid for it. Why not end the campaign with a bang? Win or Lose his campaign is already historic. But I guess it hard for you guys to understand. This is not Obama’s money, this money of everyday workers who send in a little to help out with the campaign. But I guess McCain cares more about looks then substance, that is why he misread Obama in the first place. McCain thought Obama would wilt at a substantive attack but he didn’t and fought back with the truth and the American people saw that. Obama deserves to be President, he has earned it.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Amazing…
This country is headed for a depression and Caribou Barbie needs some new clothes, make up, accessories and someone to comb her hair all in the tune of 150K.
First she accepts gifts totaling more than 22K and doesn’t report that on her taxes, and then she charges the state of Alaska to eat and sleep in her home for a sum of about 21K, and then another charge of over 44K, to let her kids travel with her to events they were never invited for, and doesn’t report that on her taxes.
And she is just like the rest of us?
Give me a freakin break…. I could live to be 100 and never even come close to spending 150K on clothes for myself or my 5 kids in their lifetime.
The media really needs to dig in and see about her other ethics charges she is facing in Alaska and let us really know who Sarah Palin is….
McCain, you really blew it for yourself when you chose this half-baked alaskan as your VP.
Send her back to AK, and her fancy mansion and 500k house, she is not like the rest of us…
She is an ELITIST
Posted by: lmg | October 22, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
How much did this “tax expert” cost? Anywhere $29 million a week?
Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
The great Donna Brazile:
“Let Gov. Palin and the RNC continue to spend money as Americans lose their retirement funds, life savings, pensions and homes. She will soon become a symbol of ‘all dressed up and nowhere to go.”
Posted by: nietzsche | October 22, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
i cannot wait to get money from the rich—hand it over mccain.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
John McCain – “I voted with Bush 90% of the time.
All you need to know in order to decide on November 4.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
I love how Republicans try to redefine elitism because most republicans running are rich or have elite status from their parents. How can man raised by his grandparents, who still wears pants he bought 10 years ago, be an elitist. Let’s face it Bush (oil money elitist), and McCain (military family elitist). Republicans think their better then us, and that less people should vote. Well I will be voting before November 4.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
==i cannot wait to get money from the rich==
Oh, YOU think it’s not gonna cost you anything? You think you won’t pay more for a loaf of bread, nor for gas? You think the rich are just gonna stand there and give their money to you and take the loss?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
How much has Obama, McCain and Biden spent on their clothing???? This is STUPID!!!!
Posted by: CC | October 22, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
the repubs are against taking from the rich and give to the poor–DONT TELL ME THEY ALSO KILLED ROBIN HOOD.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
==John McCain – “I voted with Bush 90% of the time.==
How often did Obama vote with Pelosi, Reid and the Dems? 100% OF THE TIME.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
==How much has Obama, McCain and Biden spent on their clothing???? This is STUPID!!!!==
You can thank the Libs for that “share the stupidity” policy.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
“You think the rich are just gonna stand there and give their money to you and take the loss?”
Jesus said it was easier for a camel to pass thru the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven.
Guess he was right.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“How often did Obama vote with Pelosi, Reid and the Dems? 100% OF THE TIME.”
Their approval rating is hovering around zero.
Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
To put it in perspective: The average cost of a 30-second prime-time Olympics spot runs about $700,000.
…and the clothes are not taxable if the GOP donates the clothing after the campaign.
Yes, this is costly. But that speaks to our cultural need for perfect looking candidates. I wouldn’t pin this one solely on Palin or the GOP.
Posted by: Mike | October 22, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Mr. Incredible
Hypocrisy is saying something is stupid or irrelevant only when the opponent brings it up. McCain and his supporters have a bad habit of doing this.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
$150,000 shopping sprees (at all the best “elitist” shops, no less), on the Republican National Committee tab.
$21,012 worth of free flights for her daughters, charged to the state.
All this, when she already makes $125,000 a year as governor and pockets an extra $22,883 in energy extraction royalties.
Sarah Palin is a chisler supreme.
All of which makes the fact that she charged $16,951 in expenses charged to the state, including 312 per diem allowances for staying in her own home just that much more amazing.
A dual income family, with Sarah earning $125K. Free travel (even for the family), and now free clothes, hair and makeup. They can actually go out in her backyard and shoot a moose, keeping her family in free mooseburger for a year. And still she feels the need to cheat. Shoot that moose for free and still charge the state $60 per burger. And she claims she deserves every bit of it.
Now that’s what I call a perverse sense of entitlement.
“Sounds like socialism to me,” to borrow a phrase.
Just another fake “bootstrapper” Republican. What a shocker.
Posted by: Kagro X | October 22, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Mr. Incredible, unfortunately there’s alot we can thank the Libs for!!! Including our housing mess!
Posted by: CC | October 22, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
How often did Obama vote with Pelosi, Reid and the Dems? 100% OF THE TIME”
During the current session of Congress Obama has voted with the Democrats 96% of the time.John mcCain has voted 88% of the time with the GOP.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
==”You think the rich are just gonna stand there and give their money to you and take the loss?”
Jesus said it was easier for a camel to pass thru the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven. ==
He didn’t say that a rich man cannot get to Heaven. He referred to a rich man who lets his riches control his life not getting into Heaven. But, of course, you’d have to read the rest of the Story to get that. Scoffers look only for a verse, or two, that appear to support them.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Mr. Incredible
You just took McCain’s quote and replace McCain with Obama, Bush with Reid and Pelosi, and 90% with 100%. That is either a lie or plagiarism.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
==CANNOT WAIT TO GET SOME RICH MONEY.HOW SWEET IT WILL BE.==
You’ll pay for it, too, and how sweet THAT will be.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Wow! I missed these same stories when it came to Obama’s custom made suit for his Dem convention and his other events…
I guess those were just considered as “gifts” under $25.00.
Posted by: Dave in lv | October 22, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
“During the current session of Congress Obama has voted with the Democrats 96% of the time.John mcCain has voted 88% of the time with the GOP. ”
And the other 4% of the time he hit the wrong button.
Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
CC
Really blaming the bystanders for the devils work is not becoming. Republicans pushed deregulation, deregulation caused the crisis. Tell McCain to explain why that Enron Lobbyist still has a job on his campaign.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“He didn’t say that a rich man cannot get to Heaven. He referred to a rich man who lets his riches control his life not getting into Heaven”
Exactly.
And it was posted in response to you posting this.
“You think the rich are just gonna stand there and give their money to you and take the loss?”
The lesson for the day? Right wingers are dumb.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
==Mr. Incredible
You just took McCain’s quote and replace McCain with Obama, Bush with Reid and Pelosi, and 90% with 100%. That is either a lie or plagiarism.==
You forgot another possibility: It’s the truth. Obama voted with Pelosi, Reid and the Dems more than McCain voted with Bush.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
IF ALASKA BECOMES ANOTHER COUNTRY—–PALIN THE EMPEROR WILL HAVE CLOTHES.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
It is hard to undo over 10 years of bad Republican policies in 2 years.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Mr. Incredible
You don’t even list where the supposed quote came from, for all I know a blogger made it up.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
“Wow! I missed these same stories when it came to Obama’s custom made suit for his Dem convention and his other events”
Actually the media did write about Obama’s suits and how they are union made.
Courtesy the Chicago Tribune:
“When Sen. Obama steps onto the stage in Denver on Thursday night to accept the Democratic nomination for president, he plans to wear a classic two-button, navy, merino wool and cashmere suit from Chicago-based Hartmarx Corp., the company said. The largest suitmaker in the U.S. has sold suits to Obama over the years and, at the presidential hopeful’s request, sent two tailors to his Kenwood home earlier this month to custom-make a suit for the historic speech.
The company’s highest-end Hickey Freeman suit brand is made in Rochester, N.Y., but Obama opted for the Hart Schaffner Marx label made in Des Plaines at a union shop. The team made the suit in four days.
For those who scoff that pleats are out of fashion, let the record show that Obama’s pants were indeed pleated, with an inch-and-a-quarter cuff. (He has the height to carry them off, OK? And a 33-inch waist.) The suit would retail at a store such as Nordstrom for $1,500.”
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
PELOSI WOULD MAKE A GREAT PRES.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
==/==”He didn’t say that a rich man cannot get to Heaven. He referred to a rich man who lets his riches control his life not getting into Heaven”
Exactly.
And it was posted in response to you posting this.
“You think the rich are just gonna stand there and give their money to you and take the loss?”==
The rich are what makes this economy hum cuz it is THEIR money creating jobs. You don’t invest, and, if you do, you support the system you rail against. That’s hypocrisy.
Jesus’ quote doesn’t apply to the rich who understand that it is God’s money and that they are using it for His glory. Jesus didn’t say I can’t be rich.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
“It’s the truth. Obama voted with Pelosi, Reid and the Dems more than McCain voted with Bush.”
Except its false. You said 100%. Its 96% for the current Congress. It was 94.8% for the 109th session.
You could easily say that but instead you had to lie and exaggerate like the typical right winger.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
mr
now that is what you call a repub twist–palin style.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
John McCain “I voted with Bush 90% of the time”
All you need to know in order to decide on November 4
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Mr. Incredible
Both religiously and economicly wrong. Number 1 the meaning of that quote is that is hard to give up everything and devote a life to poverty when have much to lose or value money over people. Something the rich need to take a look at. Number 2 the economy is ran by the majority of people spending, the middle class. Rich people spending levels are basically level no matter how much they make and only account for a small portion of jobs. Small businesses and middle class folks are the people that keep the economy moving. But I guess your not so incredible after all.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
mr incrediable must be a millionaire and worried about us spending his money—
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
==You said 100%. Its 96% for the current Congress. It was 94.8% for the 109th session. ==
So, you agree that Obama is in Pelosi, Reid and the Dems’ pocket. Great.
By the way, McCain voted with the Republicans 90% of the time. Far less than Obamoid.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
“Jesus didn’t say I can’t be rich.”
Oh you must be a pick and choose Christian then.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
==mr incrediable must be a millionaire and worried about us spending his money==
Not at all. There are soooo many places to put my money where you can’t get it. Sooo many places where I can protect my dough AND create jobs elsewhere and make more.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
==”Jesus didn’t say I can’t be rich.”
Oh you must be a pick and choose Christian then. ==
Not at all. I’m a Scripture upon Scripture person, then.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Obama votes 96% of the time with Democrats.
McCain votes 90% of the time with Bush.
Right winger says McCain’s total is farr less than Obama’s.
6% is now far less in the right wing mind.
So I guess McCain has “far less” support than Obama according to polling.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
==the meaning of that quote is that is hard to give up everything and devote a life to poverty when have much to lose or value money over people.==
It is the love of money that is the problem, not the money.
So, Jesus never said that I must give up money to run with Him. He said that I must give up the LOVE of money to run with Him. The WHOLE Word matters.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Correction and correction: It was the New York Post, and here is their retraction:
“The source who told us last week about Michelle Obama getting lobster and caviar delivered to her room at the Waldorf-Astoria must have been under the influence of a mind-altering drug. She was not even staying at the Waldorf. We regret the mistake, and our former source is going to regret it, too. Bread and water would be too good for such disinformation.”
Couldn’t agree more. So why keep lying about it?
Posted by: Mara | October 22, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
==Obama votes 96% of the time with Democrats.
McCain votes 90% of the time with Bush.
Right winger says McCain’s total is farr less than Obama’s.
6% is now far less in the right wing mind. ==
In the Lib mind, 96% = 90%.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
i really think it was about a RICH man getting into heaven—–find it out the hard way you cannot take it with you.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Jesus didn’t say people couldn’t be rich, he also said you didn’t have to be a Jew to accept Jesus, or that we shouldn’t discriminate against people not like us. Republicans forget this is in the bible in it is convenient. They forgot it while talking about illegal immigrants. They forgot it while talking about Muslims. They forgot while talking about black people. They forgot it while talking about liberals. They forgot it while talking about pro-choice people. I guess republicans are Christians when it is politically convenient.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“It is the love of money that is the problem, not the money’
It’s the attachment to the money that’s the problem. Many similiarities between Buddhism and Christianity.
Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Mr. Incredible
Yes and you got the meaning and words wrong in your previous quote.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Remember that rich people don’t get rich, nor stay rich, by pocketing the money they make. They have to invest it. Investment makes this country hum by creating opportunities for jobs. Put the arm on the rich and the corporations with money and you force them and their money off shore.
I don’t care WHERE I make my money. I’ll be glad to take my money to, say, Ireland, where, for example, the corporate rate is 11%.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
==”It is the love of money that is the problem, not the money’
It’s the attachment to the money that’s the problem. ==
No, the Word of God says that it is the “love” of money that is the evil:
(1Ti 6:10) For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
==i really think it is about putting money before your fellow man.==
Then take your paycheck and give it to me, your fellow man.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
do you dissagree.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“(1Ti 6:10) For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.”
I was just commenting on the similiarites between Buddhism and Christianity. I’ve never read the bible.
Posted by: Mack | October 22, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Mr. Incredible
The rich make money with money. Jewish consider that a sin. Money is corrupting. People make money, to have more of it. Who really needs over $500,000? The quote was about service, it is okay to be rich as long as you give back to those less fortunate. To whom much is given, much is expected.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
charity begins at home and all i have goes to my family first
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
mm they dont understand—just greedy hypocrites.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
==you got the meaning and words wrong in your previous quote. ==
I got the idea correct in the paraphrase of the verse. That’s allo that matters, except when a verse uses a specific word, like, “love” of money. I used it in the paraphrase cuz it is specific and makes my paraphrase correct.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The tax expert is right, but the RNC hires their candidates and the Palins have been made multi-millionaires by agreeing to run with McCain.
She’ll be able to pay.
Posted by: basementfrog | October 22, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
“I don’t care WHERE I make my money. I’ll be glad to take my money to, say, Ireland, where, for example, the corporate rate is 11%.”
Your words make Lee Greenwood cry.
Gotta love right wing hypocrisy.
Right wingers consider everyone that does not share their views to be unAmerican or even anti-American. But raise their taxes a little and they flip out and threaten to bolt the country.
Hypocrisy thy name is Mr Incredible.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Mr. Incredible
I love how you agreed to pay more taxes in Ireland. I guess the U.S. has too many tax breaks for ya.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
don’t care WHERE I make my money. I’ll be glad to take my money to, say, Ireland, where, for example, the corporate rate is 11%.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | Oct 22, 2008 7:11:28 PM
The Republicans talk about country first, but have you noticed they don’t want to put their money back into our economy instead they would take it to Ireland. If you really care about this country, you would help those less fortunate than yourself.
Posted by: Jwench | October 22, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Mr. Incredible
The parable isn’t about money, its about service.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
On Spreading the Wealth:
John McCain, 2000
“I don’t think the governor’s tax cut is too big—it’s just misplaced. Sixty percent of the benefits from his tax cuts go to the wealthiest 10% of Americans—and that’s not the kind of tax relief that Americans need. … I don’t believe the wealthiest 10% of Americans should get 60% of the tax breaks. I think the lowest 10% should get the breaks. “I’m not giving tax cuts for the rich.”
John McCain, 2000
“I always thought that class warfare was to take away from the rich. As I said, there are tax breaks and money for the richest in America and the very rich, but I think that it’s clear that there’s a growing gap between rich and poor in America, the haves and the have-nots. … and I think that the people who need it most and need the relief most are working middle-income Americans and that’s what I want to give to them.”
Thi socialism talk is tripe – and its because the Republicans are getting desperate. The largest transfer of capital from the private sector to the public secotr (this IS socilaism) in American history occurred two weeks ago – at the insistence of President Bush. He has not only nationalized the mortage and insurance industries, he has nationalized banks. John McCain made sure he flew back to Washington to vote for it – and he did.
Posted by: Mara | October 22, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
==The parable isn’t about money, its about service.==
It’s about how letting money control your life instead of God, and that such love for money is one of the tickets to the “other place,” not to Heaven.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Mr. Incredible
You need to read the bible, it is about service. It can be applied to many things status, wealth, power. It is about service and what it means to service.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“It’s about how letting money control your life instead of God, and that such love for money is one of the tickets to the “other place”
And since you plan to take your money and run, enjoy the other place!
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
i remember when young and very poor -how the ones with fancy clothes thought they were better because of having a substantial amount of money—most live a very troubled life—-but this has nothing with palin 150 thousand for clothes or dose it—-it could have done a great job stocking a food pantry.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
The individual tax rate for someone making over 34,000 euros/year is 41%, Doesn’t sound like a better deal to me.
Posted by: mara | October 22, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
some of you guys better stock up on ice water.for the trip.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
==You need to read the bible…==
Translation: “hath God said…?”
==… it is about service.==
Service of whom and for what?
== It can be applied to many things status, wealth, power.==
Oh, you think It’s about service TO the world, making everybody worldly comfy?
== It is about service and what it means to service.==
Serve who for what?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
==you got the meaning and words wrong in your previous quote. ==
You said I got the words wrong.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
mrs strongest trait is money–
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
==it [the Word of God] is about service.==
It is about the spiritual journey one must undertake to get to Heaven. That spiritual journey doesn’t go through world-pleasing.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Mr. Incredible
Oh My God, you haven’t the slightness clue what the bible is about. You read the words and don’t understand the meaning or context. You forgot the sermon on the mount. Jesus was the biggest advocate for the poor and service in the bible. With respect to the parable the story goes that man approach Jesus and asked him how do I get into heaven, he had obeyed all the commandments and regulations. So Jesus said give away all your personal belongings and walk with me. The point of the story is what do you value yourself or others. It was about service to God vs. service to Self. And as any Christian knows that service to God is service to people because he calls on us to aspire to agape.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I expect her to pay TAXES on $150,000!!!
Obama\Biden08
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | October 22, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
palin is nts—not -to swift——and doing things like 150 thousand for clothes shows a greedy uneducated person
goodnight.
Posted by: rodney | October 22, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
“Where was that understanding for George Bush”
There would have been more understanding for Bush if we didn’t find out he was warned in August about an imminent attack and then took the whole month off.
If he didn’t run and hide while Americans died.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Mr. Incredible
What number of American Heroes have died because you put Bush in office?
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
“What number of America casualites are you willing to absorb while Obama gets his feet wet”
I am guessing none since President Obama would actually be doing his job and protect America vs Bush ignoring warnings and going on vacation.
Posted by: Ryan C (the real one) | October 22, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Obama is acting more of a Christian then McCain is at the moment.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
==Mr. Incredible
What number of American Heroes have died because you put Bush in office?==
None.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Mr. Incredible
I guess no American Hero has died in Iraq.
Posted by: MM | October 22, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
==I guess no American Hero has died in Iraq.==
I didn’t say that. You need to pay attention to your own questions.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | October 22, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
It’s probably not a ‘gift,’” he said. “The issue is whether it counts as ‘income.’”
ACTUALLY, they DO count as a UNIFORM!
She cannot do her job campaigning dressed in a UPS brown uniform…
She does not need the calibre of clothes she requires being in the public scrutiny her that she did in Alaska.
And who gives a damn anyways?
Don’t you guys feel there are more important things to moan about?
EGADS!!!!!
Posted by: good grief, charlie brown... | October 22, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
She’ll sell them on Ebay after the election and make the RNC money
Posted by: Russell | October 22, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
2 USC 439(a) deals with prohibited uses of campaign contributions by Federal Candidates (which includes candidates for VP). Subsection (b) of that section states the following:
(b) Prohibited use.
(1) In general. A contribution or donation described in subsection
(a) shall not be converted by any person to personal use.
(2) Conversion. For the purposes of paragraph (1), a contribution
or donation shall be considered to be converted to personal use if the contribution or amount is used to fulfill any commitment, obligation, or expense of a person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign or individual’s duties as a holder of Federal office, including—
(A) a home mortgage, rent, or utility payment;
(B) a clothing purchase;
(C) a noncampaign-related automobile expense;
(D) a country club membership;
(E) a vacation or other noncampaign-related trip;
(F) a household food item;
(G) a tuition payment;
(H) admission to a sporting event, concert, theater, or other form of entertainment not associated with an election campaign; and
(I) dues, fees, and other payments to a health club or recreational facility.
Posted by: C Hamilton | October 22, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Well, wasn’t it Sarah that said paying taxes is “unpatriotic” and spoke with disdain about those who do pay taxes (as required by federal,state, and local laws.)I’m not McCain’s scofflaw Joe the Plumber(make nowhere near $250K), but I pay my local, state, and Fed tax – and sales tax on clothes.. and, yeah – never thought of it that way, but it is patriotic. My parents taught me that we all need to pay taxes for the greater American good. Isn’t that what responsible citizens do? And just how cheap can these people be that the pay for their own clothes? A little girl carrying a Lous Vuitton bag? work hard every day and have done so for 30 years, – keep up with styles, and I
can’t afford to carry a Louis Vuitton bag – and this family buys one on the taxpayers back? Get real! Palins – Enjoy your US tour on the backs of the rest American taxpayers. Then, go home with fond memories of the free joy ride.
Posted by: Boston/NYC | October 22, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Palin is the average hockey mom I guess every hockey mom has her own tannig bed and then she gets $150 thousand in clothes and makeup wow how many hockey moms go to see their children freshly tanned and dressed to nines.Then you take your family on several trips with the state tax payre money,while there is native Alaskans that through their trash into the ocean beacuse they don’t have any of the luxuries afforded by their gov.Why have people not looked at how some of the natives live up?
Posted by: damehen | October 22, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
How do you sell someone as a no-frills hockey mom who sold the state plane, fired the official cook and turned down travel per diems for her family and then try to explain wardrobing her in clothes from Neiman Marcus — a store occasionally referred to by aggrieved, frugal shoppers as Needless Markup? How do you, in barely two months, lavish her with fashion swag worthy of a starlet and valued at more than her annual governor’s salary of $125,000?
That’s not careless.
That’s just plain stupid.
Or to use this election cycle’s phrase of choice: That’s some seriously bad judgment.
Posted by: WaPo | October 22, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
They paid retail! How unbelievably stupid. They didn’t have any Republicans in the clothing business who could do better for them. Paying retail when you know that many people and are in politics is truly criminal. She could have got $350,000 worth of clothes if she’d had a wholesale connection. Good grief. Not sure of the tax situation in that case. How Stupid of the GOP. Yes, she needed a makeover, but she wasn’t exactly just hunting moose before. She was/is the Governor. Should have bought wholesale and not such ‘elitist’ brands.
Posted by: lisaintexas | October 22, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
First it was revealed (albeit with a show of delicacy) that Mrs. Palin is essentially a crook, and now we learn she’s a fake Sacks-clad “hockey mom.” I find it truly frightening that the United States could soon be presided over by an eccentric “maverick” who chose this individual as his running mate. If McCain wins, this nightmare will not only predictably lead to a constitutional crisis, but will ultimately do even more harm to the reputation of the evangelical Christian movement than the outrageous scam put on as a Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit last year at a “natural history” museum in San Diego. See
Posted by: View from Here | October 22, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
The republican tactic of being able to dance blithly around the sleezy and illegal things they do has hit the wall with gusto this year. I wish that they would all just put on top hats and canes as they tap dance around the feeble rationalizations for their lies and thievery.
Then they could bring in the clowns, the well dressed dancing girl and the bumbling old magician. It wouldn’t make it any less entertaining for being the pathetic show that it all is.
Posted by: Revolted American | October 22, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Mr Incredible:
MY religion by-passes the middle man and deals directly with G-D!
It is the oldest monotheistic religion in the world and it’s people have suffered the slings and arrows of many just to be able to pray and show reverence for G-D in our own way.
For this freedom I (though cloutless) countlessly bless this country for providing me and you and all of it’s varied citizens the right to praise G-d or Jesus or Allah in any peaceful way we wish.
Living here, we are ALL bleassed!
Let’s not forget that~
Posted by: eyes wide. | October 22, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
The republicans are crying about their lack of funds to campaign in states they really need to cover,
yet they arrogantly justify these expenditures with “we do not discuss
our expenditures”. Ok fine then don’t cry about having less to
spend.
Posted by: shhhhh | October 22, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
And the biggest problem is, she still needs a total makeover.
Just check her favorability ratings to know why.
Posted by: hessel | October 22, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
“Then they could bring in the clowns, the well dressed dancing girl and the bumbling old magician. It wouldn’t make it any less entertaining for being the pathetic show that it all is.”
You’re talking about Obama and his star power, right?
Glitz… which rhymes with SH>>Z?
I heartily agree!
Posted by: eyes wide. | October 22, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
I would like the tax people to also tell me why Cindy McCain was in a 27% tax bracket last year!! How the heck did this not make a news cycle? 27%??
Posted by: barbara miller | October 22, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Unfortunately, she doesn’t “have to” declare them. She’s a Republican and, as we’ve seen from her in Alaska, she doesn’t have to follow any pesky “laws.”
Posted by: Virginian Marine | October 22, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
It is amazing how some continue to demonize Senator Obama even as he proves his humanity. Does that make these posters inhumane? Or merely dangerous to our democracy? The pressing danger facing us now is that of a Todd Palin WH. The parallels with Weimar Germany and the rise of the thuggish Nazis who essentially took over a civilized nation and opened the gates to its demons are scary. I am expecting a Republican victory, through voting machine cheating.
Posted by: shir | October 22, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
What everyone seems to not understand is that the clothes are an investment for the RNC. Can you imagine how much these clothes will sell on ebay? All those conservatives who get a tremble between their legs when she talks will pay huge amounts to get an outfit she wore. Start your Christmas shopping on Nov. 5th.
Posted by: Yea Baby! | October 22, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I am expecting a Republican victory, through voting machine cheating.
You’ll have a better chance of seeing a Democratic victory through voting machine cheating!
Posted by: ENOUGH ALREADY!!! | October 22, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
That’s what happens when John tells his wife Cindy to take Sarah out shopping for clothes.
Posted by: Julie S. | October 22, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
So she can dress a moose, but not herself? You’d think Caribou Barbie would be making her own wolf-pelt blazers or something. And nice loyalty, as a governor, to shovel $150K into Minnesota’s economy instead of her own. Isn’t there a Nordstrom’s of Nome??
Sure, they’re giving all the clothes to charity. What about the hairstylist, though? Is there a Highlights for the Homeless program out there?
Posted by: Dr. Who | October 22, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
If this woman had any brains whatsoever, she would have checked with a reputable attorney on this matter, especially because of what is going on with Senator Ted Stevens. This is a concrete example of why she should have nothing to do with the White House, except perhaps to visit. This woman has proven time and time again that she is not qualified to be vice president. I am totally baffled that McCain with all his alleged experience made such a poor choice as a running mate. Then again that type of judgment should not surprise us from someone who conducts Alaska’s official business through a personal Yahoo account. The KGB and our enemies would be laughing their heart out at our expense for putting such a simpleton in the position of vice president of our country.
Carlos Jean-Gilles
Saint Louis, MO
Posted by: Carlos Jean-Gilles | October 22, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
She’s just an every day “hockey mom” with her $150K clothes. Right… Right?
It’s only fitting that this would be the final nail in the McCain/Palin campaign (I hope it is anyway) … a superficial ending to a superficial campaign.
Sarah Palin is the actual “celebrity” John McCain used to pretend he was campaigning against.
Posted by: Marvin Music | October 22, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Sure, they’re giving all the clothes to charity. What about the hairstylist, though? Is there a Highlights for the Homeless program out there?
—————-
No, actually they said they were giving the clothes they bought her for the convention to charity. Since most of the clothes were purchased after the convention, I guess she gets to keep them.
I do hope she gets nailed by the IRS for the clothes and for the money she took from the State of Alaska to pay for her children’s travel when they were not going anywhere to represent the State. Sarah Palin could end up with quite a tax bill next year.
Posted by: Kate Henry | October 22, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
It seems pretty sexist to think that only one type of clothing could be a uniform. Also, it’s probably not the case that the clothing wouldn’t have a high residual value. In an auction they might fetch even more than when new.
It would also be nice if Tapper had spoken to a lawyer about this, because the election law seems to be clear that if an expense is for use during the campaign it’s legit.
Posted by: Huh? | October 22, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
” seems pretty sexist to think that only one type of clothing could be a uniform.”
Posted by: Huh? | Oct 22, 2008 11:47:18 PM
Huh? is my reaction to your statement.
Why is it sexist? A “uniform” is generally considered to be clothing that you are required to wear for work, and can not be worn for non-work activities.Nothing sexist about it other than the writer chose an example that could be construed as Male. Oh wait, the female UPS driver is at the door, and guess what she is wearing?
Posted by: Mr.Boots | October 22, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
OMG -what a screwed up posting site. Never again will I post where a password is not required.
No credibility in the comments section. what a complete waste of time. bye
Posted by: barbara miller | October 22, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Typical Republican.
Call the other guy elitist and out of touch with regular Americans all the while getting $18k per week in clothes, accessories, and makeup.
Posted by: Matt | October 23, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Unfortunatly none of this matters.
It was close but stolen in 2000 and close but stolen in 2004..This will be a stolen landslide. And you wonder why they have brought the army for crowd control??
The army is either becuase bush is planning a Coup d’état or they know stealing victory from a 10 point loss will raise some eyebrows.
Posted by: getpresales.com | October 23, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
WWJD?
(What would Joe don?)
I thought she was one of us?
Remember me Sarah? Its me, Joe Sixpack…er…Plumber.
My house cost less that 150K.
Posted by: Steve | October 23, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
the RNC lent her lower 48 state moderate temp clothes, a campaign uniform… big deal…
B. Hussein Obama got his house via mob connections, associates with admitted unrepentant terrorists, and spouts marxist philosophy as his own, and admits he doesn’t support the Bill of Rights and wants parts repealed.
Posted by: akia | October 23, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Palin believes that dinosaurs played with humans. What a waste of a brain. Let’s move on.
Posted by: Ben | October 23, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am
“No practical value”?? Have you seen the crowds who follow Sarah around and chant out her name? I’ll bet lots of them would pay top dollar to buy something at auction that she had worn.
I can just see it at the office party the buyer would go to, saying “This was worn by Sarah Palin!”
Hahahaha!!!
Posted by: WaynesWorld | October 23, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
Isn’t the real point that Sarah Palin is a true middle class person who doesn’t regularly shop at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue, such that the GOP had to actually buy her this stuff? Unlike everyone else in this race on both sides, she actually IS one of “us.”
If she’s so middle class on that salary from Alaska and all her perks and free plane rides for family and all, why didn’t she just wear her own clothes? Why the shopping sprees when the market is crashing? Somebody told her to do it? Well, that’s true in most areas. For a reformer, she hasn’t reformed anything. In charge of energy? The thing hasn’t even been o.k.ed and she’s taking credit.
Posted by: Sarah | October 23, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am
The RNC should have invested in knowledge of constitution rather than clothes. Palin assertion that she will lead policy and legislation of Senate in her role as VP defies even the basic knowledge an immigrant is aware of in taking a citizenship exam.
55% of Americans are very afraid of Palin as choice of VP for McCain. His age now becomes a factor in this election with Palin within a heartbeat of assuming the role of POTUS in the event McCain wins. She is truly not ready for this mantle of leadership and I personally find McCain’s choice of Palin troubling.
Posted by: Jim from Ohio | October 23, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
Get a life! The plain fact is that female politicians are judged on their attire and male politicians are not. A man need only wear a decently fitting dark suit. So you expected her to go out on the campaign trail wearing jeans and a t-shirt?
Has anyone in the media asked Nancy Pelosi or Hillary about the cost of their wardrobe? The hypocrisy makes me ill…
Posted by: Jonathan | October 23, 2008, 5:02 am 5:02 am
Mmmmmmm…..
Does that mean if I can get my employer to buy all of my clothes, I can say the company owns the duds and I just borrowed them. I do not have to use my own income for clothes and my employer can deduct my clothes as a business expense. So now my company can pay me in clothes instead of money.
Posted by: Jim | October 23, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am
The McCain campaign says these clothes will be donated to charity. Isnt that rich? Any one wanna bet that this decision was made AFTER it got into the news? Otherwise, Sarah Palin would be prancing around Wasila with the designer duds. The difference here: Obama isnt using Party or Government cash to make his purchases.
Lets say I used RNC or Government funding to make clothing purchases of $1,000. This is in and of itself a violation. For he sake of argument, lets allow that I donate the clothes to charity with a depreciated value of $500.00. Not only have I benefitted from the purchase in the amount of $500.00, but also may very well get a tax write off for the donation, which is another benefit. This defies the intent of the rules banning clothing purchases. In addition, the reading of the rules implies it was illegal to make the purchases in the first place. Its like a bank robber stealing money, and then saying “I was gonna give it to charity”. HOGWASH!!! McCain and Palin are BOTH corrupt.
Posted by: Andy Stanley | October 23, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
How about the $13,000 for make-up in the month of September? Put another way, she spends more for make-up than a minimum wage worker earns in a YEAR of labor.
This is the same Party that refused to raise the minimum wage for a decade!
Posted by: james roberts | October 23, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am
I do not think anyone would argue that Sarah needs to dress nicely for the campaign trail. But she was a governor of a state. She had no clothes? Hillary had her OWN pantsuits from the senate–I saw her in many of them on CSPAN. Also too, she could have gotten some very nice clothes at stores that “regular women” shop at in a
re(de)pression. She went to Neiman Mark Up and Saks instead. I make 200K a year and can’t afford those stores! The point is, she is trying to say her opponent is elitist and she’s a regular gal–can you spell “hypocrisy”
Posted by: cathy | October 23, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
Novel assertion. Why doesn’t Ted Stevens just say VECO was loaning him the improvements on his home contingent on him returning them at some unspecified date in the future?
Posted by: steve duncan | October 23, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
TROOPERGATE, NOW FASHIONGATE!!
Her salary in ALASKA is $125,000 a year. But she spent $150,000 on clothes.
Talking about living beyond your means. She’s a real fiscal conservative role-model!!
Posted by: PB | October 23, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Has anyone in the media asked Nancy Pelosi or Hillary about the cost of their wardrobe? The hypocrisy makes me ill…
Try to peddle faster and keep up with the rest of us.
Nancy and and Hillary ARE NOT campaigning on the platform that they are just ordinary hockey moms driving around town in a 3 year old dented maroon Dodge Caravan full of kids and the family dog.
Can you hear me know??
Posted by: Bob | October 23, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Jim,
The difference is that Palosi and Clinton buy their own clothes and don’t accept them from the Democratic National Committee nor donors to the campaign.
Posted by: RichardinDlemar | October 23, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
{[[Jake, get out of Sarah's closet.]] says Joe the Plumber.}
Hey Joe,
Pay your back taxes, pay that fine you owe to the Arizona License Bureau, and get a plumbing license and register yourself!!
Posted by: goodandtrue | October 23, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Her salary in ALASKA is $125,000 a year. But she spent $150,000 on clothes.
Talking about living beyond your means. She’s a real fiscal conservative role-model!!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
We need to be fair in these matters. It’s common knowledge among job applicants when interviewing for a job you need to dress for that job.
You don’t dress for the job you have. You dress for the job you aspire to.
It’s called dressing for success. You update your resume, buy some new threads, put a shine on those shoes, get your hair done and then go for it.
You look sharp, you feel sharp, sister, YOU ARE SHARP!!
Posted by: Bob123 | October 23, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
She’s got the zap on her head, the delusions of grandeur. It’ll be bad if they lose (which is seeming likely). Note to her friends: Keep her away from sharp objects when the election results start coming in.
Posted by: Mage | October 23, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Palin needed clothes… I’ve seen how she dressed before the campaign and it was not to win.
What should have happened is the McCains should have purchased the clothes from their abundant personal fund for her. And then *after* the election they could have given them all to the RNC to auction off as a fundraiser. Win or lose, it would make money, and this would have been a win-win for everyone. Palin gets to dress up for a while, and McCain gets a tax writeoff for a contribution to the political party he has all but destroyed, and the RNC gets some much needed cash.
The lack of insight into how to do this correctly is exactly why McCain/Palin should lose the election. Executives who make really bad decisions.
Posted by: Alan | October 23, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Can the GOP have anything else go wrong for them. This is crazy, trooper-gate, tax-gate, smear-gate and now fashion-gate, will their base ever wonder just what is wrong? You would think that they would think about these things just a little before thinking the liberal media (who gives McCain a pass on almost everything) just has it in for them. I can hear them now!
Posted by: Kathy | October 23, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
An unnamed source? Come on, give us a name! How do we know that this joker of “a well-respected and well-known tax attorney” hasn’t donated the maximum amount to the Obama campaign, or the DNC, or doesn’t work for Miner, Barnhill & Galland, who used to employ Obama?
Posted by: Tom | October 23, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Coming to the defense of the modus operandi of hypocrisy and GOP elitism, Joe Scarborough stated yesterday on Morning Joe: “We can’t have a candidate dressed from Wal-Mart”
Seems those small town REAL America values can’t be seen out in public, especially representing the GOP.
Posted by: Begonia Buzzkill | October 23, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
The main story here is that Mz Palin came out of Alaska touting herself as a reformer and got rid of the good ole boys. Well, she is worse than the good ole boys she claimed to have ousted–which she didn’t actually oust the feds were already investigating them. Now that the story has come to light the cloths are ‘loaned’ and will be ‘donated’. Please, if this story had not come to light her and her children would be headed back to Alaske with designer dudes.
Posted by: lt | October 23, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
A woman who looks as nice as Palin could buy a suit at Sears and still look great. This Nieman Marcus wearin’hockey mom story isn’t selling.
Posted by: Shades | October 23, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
With imagination and resourcefulness, two qualities which should be mandatory for the position she seeks,one could dress elegantly on very little. With one navy blue, one grey, one neutral, one brightly colored suit, mixing things up could provide anyone with a month of outfits. And these suits can be found at outlet and thrift stores.
If she truly was like the rest of us, she would “make do”.
Posted by: realvirginiantoo | October 23, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
PALIN IS GOVERNOR OF ALASKA….ARE WE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE SHE DOES NOT HAVE A’WORKING’ WARDROBE FOR THE OFFICE?DOSE SHE GO TO THE GOV. OFFICE IN HUNTING GEAR? SHE TOUTS HERSELF AS ‘ONE OF US’..WHAT ‘US’ IS SHE REFERRING TO?HOW MANY OF ‘US’ SHOP AT NM OR SAKS?
Posted by: J SOLOMON | October 23, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Vera Wang has a new line out for Kohl’s department stores. How much more affective would the “real American” story have been if the campaign had gotten in touch with Kohl’s and chosen clothes from the Wang line and others that really did keep her on par with American values? Instead, she allows someone to choose her clothes, dress her and style her much like a movie set or a play session with Barbie. Think about how appealing it was to women who watched “The View” when Michelle Obama was wearing a $125.00 dress from White House/Black Market. While still over the top for some shoppers, a lot more in line with most.
Posted by: donna | October 23, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Barack wears resoled shoes, and Michelle sports a $34.95 dress. But let’s not go there, they are elitists who are not proud of America!
This Caribou Barbie is an A-grade phoney. She was for the birdge before she was against it, before she decided to take the money anyway. She put the Alaska biz jet – mostly used to ferry prisoners out of state – on eBay but didn’t sell it, and finally sold it at a loss! She fired the gubernatorial mansion chef, and then charged per diems for working out of home. She pledged to cut waste and inefficiency and then decided to parade her children on the national stage at state expense. She decided to be an efficient budget manager but left the city of Wassilla a humongous deficit. She is supposed to be an experienced executive but was mayor of a ciy that has no responsibility for services, schools, safety etc. She is supposed to be foreign affairs expert whom McSame has consulted many times (forget he didn’t know till about three months back) and can’t find even Texas on a map!
Compared to all that this $150k splurge is small change. Of course let’s forget that a certain Sen.McCain in 1993 – on the floor of the Senate – railed against using campaign money on personal expenses and wanted candidates to be penalised for that!
Posted by: goodandtrue | October 23, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Whether you’re a Manchurian Candidate, or a Stepford Wife, you gotta dress the part.
She’s as phony as a three dollar bill, and no amount of lies, mirrors, or smoke the RNC throw around can cover that hard, cold fact.
Posted by: Martin | October 23, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I’d drop dead from shock if Palin told the taxman thanks but no thanks in declaring $150K value of her clothes.
Posted by: buzziea | October 23, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
It’s not longer, drill baby drill.
It’s
SHOP! BABY, SHOP!
Posted by: TexGal51 | October 23, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
New motto:
SHOP, BABY, SHOP!
Posted by: TexGal51 | October 23, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
She could have very easily shopped somewhere else for at least a fourth of that cost. That’s ridiculous…and a little heard to swallow.
Posted by: Gwen | October 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
She does look good on those clothes or perhaps just as good out of them but looks don’t matter, she is still not good as VP and that is what this election is about. Go back to Alaska with designers or without them you’ll never make it in the National theater.
Posted by: Horace | October 23, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Heck, I have coins & no kids and never shop at those stores.
I’ll stick with Banana Republic.
Posted by: Vince in NYC | October 23, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
what do you do when the economy is in the tank.
HOCKEY MOMS GO SHOPPING!
SHOP BABY SHOP!
I LOVE IT!
so while she was standing before the hockey moms saying “hey, i’m just like you,
behind your back she was SHOPPING!
SHOP BABY SHOP!
Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz! | October 23, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
wonder how much the rnc and fox paid for joe the plumbers suit. when he was on fox news in the morning?
milk em’ joe milk em’!
Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz! | October 23, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
how can mccain run this country he can’t even run his campaign.
he has needed two life lines
he was all but down and out
and he grabbed sarah palin
and then he started to sink and
he grabbed joe the plumber
william ayers will fair better with mccain tax plan.
maybe he will grab bill ayers. next.
Posted by: cheer up,smile,nertz! | October 23, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Spending $150,000 on clothes only the rich can afford is just the RNC’s demonstration of how trickle-down works.
Posted by: Cazador | October 23, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Come now, is this really a story? All the candidates and their wives by the way looks good themselves. Did you research how much they spend on their clothes?
Palin has been toasted in every which way. Been the subject of jokes and personal attacks. Been called many names you can’t even say it here.
But notice how she persevere. How graceful she has been about the personal attacks against her. Here is a woman who is true to her belief and willing to offer her experience to the country she loves. What can be bad about that?
Just because we don’t agree with her belief, aspirations and agenda doesn’t mean we should maliciously and purposely makes her looks bad in every possible way.
So lets just give her a little slack and let her be just one the guys.
Posted by: beth | October 23, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
I’ll be talking with my tax specialist about a possible use of the “Palin defense”—deducting the cost of the clothes I wear to work, because you know, I have to look good too.
Posted by: MLO | October 23, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
For those who wish to call Sarah Palin one of the guys who also spend oodles on clothes, I would like to remind them that Michelle Obama shops mostly at The Gap.
If Sarah is as popular in Alaska as they claim she is (a bogus claim by the way), then why shouldn’t she dress the way she did as governor? Isn’t Alaska high toned enough for Real Americans? Are they saying that people in Real America don’t know how to dress well when they wear windbreakers and jogging suits? If it’s good enough to wear to Walmart, isn’t it good enough to wear to rallies attended by hockey moms and Joe Six-packs?
To take up Michelle Bachman’s advice, I’m just saying that someone should look into this. What are Sarah Palin’s objections to dressing like most American women? I’m not saying she is anti-American, heaven forbid. I just think the media should do an thorough investigation before we learn too late that the unraveling fabric of our democracy is actually a $1.5K suit from Saks.
Posted by: Susan Mitchell | October 23, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
If I’m not mistaken, Nancy Reagan got involved in the same problem; she had been accepting designer clothes to wear to public functions, and she wound up being investigated by the IRS. Then, as now, the issue came down to the fact that “loans” of designer clothes left those clothes devoid of value, and they therefore counted as income.
This happend 20+ years ago, so forgive me if my memory is inaccurate; however, it seems like the Nancy Reagan precedent should hold.
Posted by: Clayton | October 23, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Come-on Republicans who are apologizing for this – would you REALLY be saying the same thing if this was a Democrat? Please. John Edward’s $400 haircut is looking like a barain at this point.
Posted by: RobertSeattle | October 23, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The fact that they spent $150K in a few days to dress Gov Palin and her family is shocking to most Americans, certainly, given that most American families don’t make $150K in a year.
But that’s not the problem. The problem is WHO spent the money. Perhaps Hillary Clinton *does* dress just as expensively. I don’t know. But the DNC never bought Hillary clothes – not as a candidate, not as first lady, not as a candidate’s wife. Never. Her clothes were NEVER paid for through anyone’s campaign contributions.
John McCain himself objected to such expenditures when he and Russ Feingold wrote the current campaign finance laws. The fact that he would go along with the dressing of his running mate to the tune of $150K just shows how far from himself he’s really come in this election. It’s heart-breaking.
Posted by: thisniss | October 23, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
OK, so a US Senator makes $169,300 a year. And the VP makes $221,000. The RNC doesn’t see a problem with blowing 150K on DRESSING for the JOB INTERVIEW?
Posted by: jerseyguy | October 23, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
It is all a strategy!!! The Republican always play around the facts the people are stupid and they’ll believe anything, and they act on that strategy. Lets’ face it most of them are old people, or very uneducated or very radical one sided that is the crowed of Rush Limbou and Foxnews. Scary but It worked in 2000 it worked in 2004 and they believed it will work this time also. The choice of Palin was also based on this. Lets us get a nice woman, the stupid people would love and believe beautiful well dressed woman and first vice president. What divides this country in not the government but the extremist on side radical republicans mentioned above. Rush Limbou what a wonderful maverick woman and he is still defending her. When something or somebody is wrong is wrong! and if you do not have the intelligence enough to see that than you are a moron.
Posted by: Lou | October 24, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
The fact that Palin says she’s just borrowing the clothes and that they’ll be “returned or given to charity” sounds like a concession speech to me. Anyone else?
Posted by: David Mesirow | October 25, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
wow
Posted by: y | October 27, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
It’s not simple. If RNC can somehow prove that the clothe are job related “uniforms”, much like the space suits NASA astronauts wear, then they may still have an argument. After all, no astronauts paid tax on the suits.
Posted by: Panabiker | October 27, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
The tax law is quite clear. If you can wear the clothes anywhere other than work, they are not deductible. So space suits are deductible. Business suits and dresses are not.
Posted by: Amalthea | October 29, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Okay, here’s what she does. She declares them as income, donates them to charity and takes the deduction, and its a wash. Or she declares them as income, then auctions them on ebay for charity at a huge profit and deducts the full charitable contribution to offset other income. Whatever she decides to do I’m sure she’ll land on her high heeled feet.
Posted by: Adelphi00 | October 29, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm