By Dschabner

Oct 12, 2008 8:17pm

The Bidens & Clintons Come Home to Scranton

ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports: Call it a Scranton homecoming, with two former Democratic presidential hopefuls — one now the current vice presidential nominee — bringing their spouses back to this northeastern Keystone State town to stump for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., hails from Scranton, as did the father of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., so this afternoon, before a crowd of 6,000 at the Riverfront Sports Complex, the two lawmakers joined their significant others, Dr. Jill Biden and former president Bill Clinton, in calling for voters in this battleground state to come together behind Obama.

"I’ve been criss-crossing the country campaigning for Barack and Joe," said Sen. Clinton, who soundly defeated Obama in the April primary here. "Why? Because this election is too important to sit on the sidelines of history."

As Obama and Biden regularly do on the campaign trail, the New York senator repeatedly hit out at Republicans for the fragile state of the nation’s economy, as chants of "Hillary! Hillary!" echoed around the gym.

"To John McCain and George Bush, the middle class isn’t fundamental, it’s ornamental," she said. "They don’t understand that we are at the core of whether this country goes up or down. That’s why, my friends, sending the Republicans to solve this economic crisis is like sending the bull to clean up the china closet. They broke it and we’re not buying it anymore."

"Barack Obama and Joe Biden will be leaders who will lead us out of this economic crisis," she added. "They will once again clean up this economic mess. It took a Democratic president to clean up after the last president Bush, it’s going to take a Democratic president to clean up after the next one."

"Make no mistake about it, we’ve done it before and we’ll do it again," Clinton continued. "America will once again rise from the ashes of the Bushes."

In urging voters to back Obama, Clinton called this period in our nation’s history "an all-hands-on-deck moment" and told voters that if they turn out for Obama in Scranton, then the Democrats will win Pennsylvania and in turn the White House.

"We are in a financial crisis in America," she cautioned. "And it is a crisis born and bred by failed Republican policies, championed by George Bush, John McCain, and the Washington Republicans. To President Bush and John McCain, middle class families sinking into debt are invisible. We can help Americans losing their houses. But we can only do it by if we make sure the Republicans lose the White House come November.

"When this crisis finally hit Wall Street and big financial firms came calling, well, suddenly, oh my goodness, President Bush and John McCain and Republicans, they snapped to attention," Clinton continued. "A big bank is going to fail? Well, bail it out. A big financial firm is going to fail? Bail it out. A big insurance company is going to fail? Then bail it out. Well, what about the millions of people losing their homes and their jobs every single day? Where is their bailout?"

Despite the presence of the Clintons, the headliner in Scranton was the hometown boy Biden, who spoke at the tail end of the event.

"The one thing I find about this city is what we learned in our faith and our family. There is the one most serious abuse a man or a woman or a government can engage in, is to abuse power," said Biden, who last month noted that Sen. Clinton might have been a better vice presidential pick than him. "Well, ladies and gentlemen, the reason I love this woman, you think about it now. You think about it. Everything — she probably doesn’t even think of it in these terms — everything she’s devoted her life to has been on the side of people who have been on the other side of power."

For the most part, the Delaware lawmaker delivered his standard stump speech, calling the GOP ticket "unpatriotic" for allowing off-shore tax-shelters as his voice boomed throughout the gymnasium.

"I’m ready, you’re ready, Barack Obama is ready," an animated Biden said in closing, as he always does, but on this occasion virtually yelling into the microphone. "It’s our time. It’s America’s time. So get up, Pennsylvania! Get up Scranton! Get up! Deliver this election to Barack Obama! Change this country!"

Pounding the podium and pumping his fists furiously as he concluded his speech, Biden then raised the arms of his wife Jill and Sen. Clinton as the audience erupted in applause. By that point, former President Clinton was long gone, having headed down to campaign in Virginia immediately following his brief remarks.

"I am profoundly grateful to all of you who helped me to serve and who supported her, more than you will ever know," said Clinton, who some critics say has not done enough to support Obama.
"Barack Obama could not have made a better choice, so we’re proud of that," Clinton said of Biden.

The former president touted his wife’s work on Obama’s behalf, noting that she has done 50 events for the man who narrowly defeated her for their party’s nomination.

"She has not only done more to support him than any runner-up in a Democratic primary process in my lifetime, she has done more than all the other runners-up combined, and that says a lot about why she ran for president and what she believes in," Clinton said of his spouse. "And the reason, the reason that’s important is that more than three-quarters of you supported her and you need to remember if you supported her, why you did it.

"If you ask yourself who has the best ideas, who’s got the best instincts, who’s got the best ability to understand these challenges, who’s got the best supporting cast," Clinton continued, "the answer is Barack Obama and that’s why Hillary’s here, that’s why I’m here, that’s why you’re here!"

User Comments

Zero-bama is brilliant, indeed.
He has leveled the poor and rich by 50% in just one year, by tanking the stock market nearly 50%. Equality is half way under Zero-bama, before he is even elected.
0bama is directly responsible for the stock market crash because the leadership in the Congress, in supporting this Affirmative Action candidate’s approach of giving voters cash, ignored the correct solution proposed by Hillary Clinton and McCain to target the financial sectors.
Had the leadership of the Congress and Mr. Zero-bama put the country first, and made the correct judgment to use the $300 billion to rescue the financial sectors ONE full year ago, perhaps, JUST PERHAPS, the stock market would have not tanked 50%.
What we know for sure is that Zero-bama has made yet another bad judgment, a completely boneheaded mistake, to give money to individuals, which did nothing to “stimulate” the economy except continued down-slide, and this approach has failed evidenced by tanking the stockmarket by 50%.
Karl Marx would have been proud of His Nothingness for leveling the field of rich and poor by 50%, with the exchange of your retirement accounts 50% less.
Perhaps, after Zero-bama took over the country, it will be a perfect world of “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”, such that you do not need your retirement accounts.

Posted by: d0 | October 12, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

What does your rant have to do with the article. Shut up and crawl back in your hidyhole.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

***
*** 0bama is directly responsible for the
*** stock market crash
***
and don’t forget 9/11, the war in Iraq, WWII and the great depression in the 20′s also!!
The really sad part is that some people actually believe this garbage.

Posted by: MiniMouse | October 12, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Yeah, I want to ask the Clintons where is the Spode, the china, the paintings, where is all the stuff darling Hillary stole from the White House. As a tax payer, I’m sick of us being taken advantage of. They have the nerve to go trawl for Obama in the hope of a job, let me tell Bill and Hill it ain’t happening, he never honors his word to anyone. The poor black people are still waiting for this help he promised and we’re still waiting for the tax breaks.

Posted by: Jeff in the windy city | October 12, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

dO, you are an idiot!Both McIdiot And even bigger idiot Palin have been found to have poor judgment over and over! they have both been found guilty of ABUSE OF POWER!!!!! Among other things Mcidiot is still friends with Keating!Best buddies.
They are full of it!
A man who voted 3 times against making it a federal crime if an abortion clinic was Bombed!
What do you call that!
I call it unfit to lead.
If you can’t or won’t represent the diversity and differences of the people in our country you shouldn’t try to represent us!
He is old, refuses technology won’t even learn how to use a computer!
We need someone who will take us into the future.
Obama/Biden

Posted by: San | October 12, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

“If you ask yourself who has the best ideas, who’s got the best instincts, who’s got the best ability to understand these challenges, who’s got the best supporting cast,” Clinton continued, “the answer is Barack Obama and that’s why Hillary’s here, that’s why I’m here, that’s why you’re here!”
Yup, that about sums it up nicely!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

It sounds like a great event (I’d love to see video!) and Bill is right. Barack has the best ideas, best strategy, best vision, best judgment, best temperament, best instincts, and without a doubt, the BEST supporting cast. I have to laugh at the post by d0. Um, how in the world would McCain do anything remotely positive for the economy, or our standing in the world, or the poor or middle class, or the environment, or alternative energy? He says he knows how to do this and that but he’s been in office for 26 years, and much of that time Repubs have been in control of either the admin or the Senate and Congress, or both. So, why oh why hasn’t he shared his know-how with anyone? If you haven’t noticed (and it seems d) hasn’t ), it’s the Republicans who got us into the mess, and yet they want more and more of the same. Talk about people who love hitting their head against brick walls. Of course, then I suppose they’ll be brain damaged enough that no one could ever accuse them of being smart– cuz being smart is rather elitist, and elitists are lefties in that world view, no? Sheesh. To evoke Karl Marx is pretty silly, d-zero. Let’s just deal with the facts and actual policy, not erratic and bizarre accusations from the fringes of right field. I still retain some shreds of respect for McCain due to his resilience and personal courage as a POW and his many years of service, BUT his ideology and his ideas are wrong and extremely outdated, and his temperament is erratic.

Posted by: Alyson | October 12, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Hillay left the Democratic voters down.

Posted by: seah | October 12, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Obamas fault the gas prices are high
Obamas fault the stock market crashing
Obamas fault Sara Palin is a lying fraud
Obamas fault the Gop are not happy with palin
Obamas fault the sky is blue
Obamas fault it may rain
You people need to get a life! seriously
for a person you claim to have no experience he sure is responsible for alot GET OVER IT HATERS THIS AMERICA IS STANDING UP!

Posted by: angie | October 12, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

MiniMouse
You forgot Viet Nam. That’s Obama’s fault too.

Posted by: Miri | October 12, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Best ideas for ripping the American public off — yeah he’s the one alright! Morons voting for a man who has done nothing, will do nothing and the only change will be the amount he manages to steal from us, the people who work for a living!

Posted by: Jeff in the windy city | October 12, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Barack Obama’s Involvement with ACORN Unearthed, Missing Article Recovered
While Barack Obama’s connection with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) has not gone entirely unreported, it has not been fully explained. Most media background pieces simply note Obama’s involvement in a 1995 lawsuit on behalf of ACORN. Obama’s own website, as well as most major media, fail to reveal the full depth and extent of his relationship with the organization.
Attempts to hide evidence of Obama’s involvement with ACORN have included wiping the web clean of potentially damaging articles that had appeared, and were previously publicly accessible. Unfortunately, those behind the attempted cover-up failed to realize that in today’s day and age, nothing disappears forever. There also exists another layer of the web, the hidden web, which is full of information included in proprietary scholarly databases where these very same “missing” articles can be easily uncovered.

Not only does Foulkes boast of Obama’s ACORN leadership training, but also makes it clear that Obama’s post-law school organizing of “Project VOTE” in 1992 was undertaken in direct partnership with ACORN. The tie between Project VOTE and ACORN is also something that Obama and others have attempted to disprove in recent weeks as ACORN has come under fire for allegations of voter registration fraud.
As recently as March 2008, the Los Angeles Times also made reference to Barack Obama’s involvement with ACORN:
“At the time, Talbot worked at the social action group ACORN and initially considered Obama a competitor. But she became so impressed with his work that she invited him to help train her staff.” (LA Times, March 2, 2008)
All this information was easily pulled up with minimal time investment. It took less than thirty minutes to find, despite attempts by some to bury the truth. If I could find this with little effort, imagine what could be dug up with a serious, in-depth investigation. Scary, isn’t it?
Nevertheless, Barack Obama’s campaign website continues to lie and deny the truth about his involvement and association with ACORN. No matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true. The facts do not lie, Senator Obama. It’s time to come clean and tell the truth, and it’s time for the American people to demand it.
http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7203

Posted by: LightSeeker | October 12, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

– No matter how many times you say it, it does not make it true –
Yawn.. so true.. come back when you have something new to share.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

“It took a Democratic president to clean up after the last president Bush, it’s going to take a Democratic president to clean up after the next one.”
Well said, Hillary!

Posted by: chris | October 12, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Palen shot all the dinasaurs.
Jeff, what exactly do you do in the windy city? Earn a living at what?

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I am very proud of Hillary, barack better do the right thing.

Posted by: rachel | October 12, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Yeah and a republican had to clean up after NIXON!!!!!!!
Democrats say they talk about change but they go back to the past about bush. HAHAH!

Posted by: NIun | October 12, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

JEFF IN THE WINDY CITY-YOU NOTHING BUT A LOT OF FOUL AIR. GO JUMP IN LAKE MICHIGAN AND COOL OUT OR BETTER YET,USE SOME SCOPE FOR THE FOUL WORDS COMING OUT YOUR MOUTH WITH YOUR BREATH!

Posted by: READY99 | October 12, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

lightseaker, I read “allegations” of voter registration fraud and “invited” to help train staff. That’s not proof or conviction. That’s how rumor gets spread.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Wow, so now Obama has a confessed adulterer and the wife that has always turned a blind eye to his philandering. Hilary only used him to boost her own political aspirations. Like anyone even cares what the Clinton’s think!

Posted by: Lorretta | October 12, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Joe Biden gave a great speech today. I liked his line “I don’t need a lesson on patriotism from Sarah Palin, I’ve had it up to here” Great speech. Moving.
http://www.congratstothewinners.com/2008/10/joe-biden-speech.html

Posted by: FriendlyFred | October 12, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

To read about the REAL John McCain, check out the below link:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain
To read about the REAL Sarah Palin, check out the below link:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23318320/mad_dog_palin

Posted by: miles1967 | October 12, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

I must say I find this all hard to believe…That democrats are so so very desperate to get a dem in the white house that they will overlook all the underlying questions that Obama just sweeps under the rug…Let me give you all facts…Obama is friends with bill Ayers who is a known domestic terrorist..Was involved with Tony Rezco a convicted Felon which also helped Obama do some shady dealing to get his big fancy house in Hyde Park who just happens to be in the same neighborhood as Ayers Rezco Wright who was Obamas Pastor for 20 years who preached words of hate and louis Farrakhan who and I quote called Obama the Messiah…Have ya ever noticed that the only time Obama denounces any one is when it could hurt his political career??? Are you democrats that desperate to have control ? I am neither a Rep. Or Dem. I vote the best choice.And clearly McCain in this case is the best choice. You see if Obama can show such poor judgement in choosing his friends such as Ayers, Wright, Rezco who would he choose to be friends with if he were President??? Obama says he thought Ayers was rehabilated (sp) is he gonna think Bin Laden and the Taliban are too?? And I am sick of the democrats calling The Race Card anytime someone questions Obama there is nothing racial about asking questions and wanting REAL ANSWERS>not half truths as Obama is famous for telling. And the latest shady thing in his background is ACORN …Voter fraud…at first Obama camp said he had nothing to do with Acorn then as Media learned He was once a lawyer for Acorn Trained for Acorn and his Campaign gave them 800,000… all he does is lie it is sick and you all believe it…ask a chicago person when he was running for office there he promised lower taxes THEY GOT HIGHER TAXES .Think about it all then make your choice .I just hope you all wake up befor it is too late. I will take McCains record anyday at least when the Keating thing happened he was TRUTHFUL and by the way was cleared of any wrong doing by a Democrat.Obama is not truthful and to me that says alot….

Posted by: tammy | October 12, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Poor Hillary. This had to be so difficult for her. The Democratic Party (her boss) is making her do something her soul knows isn’t right. At least she and Bill are keeping it to an underwhelming minimum.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | October 12, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

“It took a Democratic president to clean up after the last president Bush, it’s going to take a Democratic president to clean up after the next one.” Not only well said but so true, so true. Time for the Republicans to turn off the kool-aid fountain they’re swimming in. As a former resident of Florida… I know you have to be very careful when swimming with Barricuda…sadly for you guys, oops you got bit by your dream ticket VP… Sarah. Shame though cause she’s alot cuter than Cheney.

Posted by: Rick_VT | October 12, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

It’s truly exciting to be a part of such an inspiring campaign. I’m sorry the McCain supporters aren’t enjoying their experience – but hey, there is still room on our side, come on over!
Obama/Biden 2008!

Posted by: carolina | October 12, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Actually, Clinton does not want barrack HUSSEN Ob(S)ama win. She will not have a chance to candidate again

Posted by: Truc Nguyen | October 12, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

The “Pumpkin Lady” turns Blue ! Nothing to worry about. Acorn has make sure the Dallas Cowboys will be voting for Obama, in Las Vegas !

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Posted by: harrison | October 12, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

To read about the REAL Obama go to…hmmm…who knows who the REAL Obama is?

Posted by: zeke | October 12, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

someone wrote “Wow, so now Obama has a confessed adulterer…” this is an attack? A defence? Geez… McCain is a documented and virtually unrepentant adulterer. He tagged Cindy while he was still married to a disabled woman. That’s low as the pond slime on a frog’s belly.

Posted by: Rick_VY | October 12, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Gee you neo-cons are absolutely stupid. You think Obama caused the crash? Oh yeah nad he was at the Hindenburg as well….
Let’s go back to 9/11, when OSAMA had his peep’s fly those planes into the towers. He knew that if he could draw use into a war we could not win – and exhaust our resources while doing so he would bring us down. And guess what – he has!
Oh we can still lay some of the blame at Americans’ feet, democrats and republicans as well – but come on – you people are out of your fricken minds.
Where in the consitution does it say you can’t speak out about America’s faults? Heck, where does it say you don’t have to believe in what the powers that be believe. You people make it like if you speak against American’s faults – your anti-american. Well I am here to tell you it ain’t so. You can speak your mind even if you don’t believe – if your against or for. You can say what you want and it does not make you less AMERICAN! I personally believe in order to become better that you must acknowledge your faults, not hide behind them and pretend that everything is all right. So when I disagree, I will speak. Even if the neo-cons try and paint me as unpatriotic, or whatever. Because that is what AMERICA is founded upon, the right to speak your mind and to point out faults – not to be ruled over and your mouths to kept shut.

Posted by: jozy | October 12, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Speaking of Acorn Gosh I would think Hillary would be ticked off knowing that Obamas Campaign gave money to Acorn thats probably the only reason he is the Dem nominee he had to buy the vote and denounce his pastor of 20 years
who preached hate …But Obama didn’t know what he was preaching ..Please what a LAME EXCUSE I guess Obama was wearing ear plugs

Posted by: Tammy | October 12, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

dO ,so obama is to blame for entire crisis? wow, you must be bush blind. obama is running for pesident to take care of your parties mess and failed administration. your funny!

Posted by: Paul | October 12, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I think Hillary did not want to be a Vice President. It would not surprise me if she will be a cabinet member. I also think she would make a first rate SENATE MAJORITY LEADER. There will always be alot of options for Hillary.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | October 12, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

what a sad day when Hillary and Bill Clinton are out stumping for someone that they know is not qualified to be President … isn”t this the “politics as usual” that the Obama Campaign said they weren”t going to be a part of?

Posted by: Truc Nguyen | October 12, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

READY99 go learn how to frigging speak you illiterate. My taxes pay for you to come online cause it sure ain’t your salary you punk. I guess commercials and Obama’s sound bites are your scope of vocabulary. Pardon the pun…switch from this page to a lexicon you might learn something Scum.

Posted by: Jeff in the windy city | October 12, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

GOP and Mccain/Palin bakers are nervous by seeing President Bill Clinton,Hillay Clinton are Campaigning side by side for Sen.Barak/Biden. Does Mccain/Palin has any message for American Voters other than Negetive Ad & Ugly comment.What a Shame. A LOOSER always behave like that,Because a looser has nothing to loose. BARAK/BIDEN will win big time in Nov.4 if not Landslide.

Posted by: mksyed | October 12, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Let’s just list the troopergate investigation to no where next to the road to no where which Sarah Palin built with the money Palin received for that bridge to no where of which Sarah told congress thanks but no thanks.
Still Governor Sarah Palin kept and built the road to no where which no one uses on the Island because the road goes no where.

Posted by: mere | October 12, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

It’s ok when people who attend a Mc Cain and Palin rally scream ” traitor, off whit his head” call him a Muslimwhen everyone knows that Obama is a Christian. Yet when other point out to Mc Cain the he is inciting racism he gets offended. Rebublicans are the most racist group of Americans. All Mc Cain does is preach hate and fear. If you believe Republicans, Obama is the cause of the housing crisis, the trouble on Wall Street. Millions of Americans losing their jobs. Just how stupid and ignorant Rebublicans are amazes me. Imagine Cindy Mc Cain calling Obama’s campain the dirtiest in history. Just where has she been. 95% of Mc Cains ads are negative. They talk about judgement yet a bi-partisan commitee just concluded that Palin abused her powers. Oh! but I guess Republicans being Republicans of couse would say she was cleared. Had that been a Democrat, they would have had a commercial on the air in seconds. Why are white people so afraid of having anyone other than a white person be president of the United States.

Posted by: DuncanMcCloud | October 12, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Hillary loves America and will do what’s necessary to help Obama win. You dolts who read these obscure websites written by ???, funded by ??? then quote their BS as if it was the WORD OF GOD!!!!!! Well, God bless your tiny little minds.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Hey McMothball fans, your anger and ignorance shows…
only 23 days
OBAMA our next president of the United States of America.

Posted by: Obama Rocks! | October 12, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

DEATH with Sadam Hussen
DEATH with Osama Binladin
————Barrack HUSEN Ob(S)ama

Posted by: Truc Nguyen | October 12, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

The Maverick McCain took from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Lobbyists, CEO’s and Executive Officers over $168,000.00 in campaign contributions – According to the Federal Election commission and Fact Check.- Now what was that name of the Reform Legislation McCain is so proud of?
But Obama only got $16,000. from the working middle class employees of those companies – NOT from the companies -according to the Federal Election commission and Fact Check.

Posted by: mere | October 12, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

google MY FELLOW PRISONERS
McCain’s Alzheimer’s moment on national tv

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Palin pretends she is not guilty because she got off on one count of firing without cause, but she was found guilty of abuse of power.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Hey dO- Open your eyes widely – look what’s happening! President Clinton left Whitehouse with surpluses and look at where you are now – debt is over 3 trillion – China will gulp you in 2 decades if you cannot send a democrat to the Whitehouse. Look at Democrats – they all support one leader and line up behind that leader. The leader that Democrats selected is addressing the issues that people have unlike the opponen’t themes of refermition of characters.
The republicans are so good at denying people- At the end of each debate the first thing they did was to get hold of the media and to declare victory, but in reality they were far from victory. FOX news is the only broadcasting channel hugely favour those republicans, e.g. Sean Hannity and Martha McCullum both have anger similar to McCain and Palin, all over their bodies against Obama campaign. Its too late to play nonsence as the general public knows who has the strategy to rise from ashes of bushes – take it with a pinch of salt! Amy

Posted by: Amy | October 12, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

It took a Democratic president to clean up after the last president Bush, it’s going to take a Democratic president to clean up after the next one
Strange. Why didn’t she say Obama? Perhaps Clinton is aware that someone was born in Keyna and is not eligible to be President?

Posted by: geevill | October 12, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Obama stole the primary from Hillary with ACORN voter fraud.

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Biden is from Scranton ? Joe, I know people fron Scranton, I’m friends with them. You are not from Scranton. Ventura county perhaps…

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I am very proud of Hillary, barack better do the right thing.
Posted by: rachel | Oct 12, 2008 9:13:50 PM
- – - — – - – - – — – — – — – — -
I am very proud of Hillary too.
Obama already blew his chance to do the right thing by not selecting Hillary as VP – even though she got more votes than any cnadidiate in the history of presidential primaries.
Maybe Obama is afraid of someone who is stronger and smarter than him?

Posted by: csh | October 12, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Lastly, McCain will win
To lead the world, US president should be a white. This is an experience, not a racism.

Posted by: Truc Nguyen | October 12, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

From ACORN’s grow little oaks. Very little.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Hey CSH, Are we disgruntle Hilary fan? Stop whining and wrongfully accusing.

Posted by: Obama Rocks! | October 12, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

jeff in the windy city–you sure you pay taxes-low-life!You another idiot that McSAME got fool. Unless you make 90,000 a year sucker {shut up}.I pay my fair share and also help people in need,you sorry a– h–e

Posted by: READY99 | October 12, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Sign this petition if you think McCain should stop talking about Obama and William Ayers…and start talking about the economy instead:
http://www.McCainPetition.com
Gregg

Posted by: Gregg | October 12, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Hey “Tammy”
Everything out of your mouth is a sound bite you picked up from a pundit. Geez, don’t you any thoughts of your own? At least you should give footnotes so you’re not accused of plagiarism.

Posted by: Lisa Smith | October 12, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Truc Nguyen – Get your sorry ass back to vietnam.

Posted by: God | October 12, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

geevill, If you listened to Senator Clinton’s speach at the rally you would have heard her say Barack Obama’s name many many times. The thing about elephants is they have big heads and tiny tiny brains. Donkey’s kick ass!
Go Obama!

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I think it’s funny how d0 and Truc Nguyen just copy and paste information from Sean Hannity’s website, thinking that they’re providing a good argument as to why Barack Obama would not be a good president. You guys are hilarious.
Funny Side Note: I’m a Technical Communicator who is currently conducting research that illustrates how much less informed conservative bloggers are than liberal bloggers. Needless to say, my results are not surprising.

Posted by: David T | October 12, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

So according to another news source Pelosi and Reid are trying to BUY the election BO now:
“After consulting with Barack Obama, Democratic leaders are likely to call Congress back to work after the election in hopes of passing legislation that would include extended jobless benefits, money for food stamps and possibly a tax rebate, officials said Saturday. The bill’s total cost could reach $150 billion, these officials said.”

Posted by: Vet1973 | October 12, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Obama has no firm plans. They change depending on the audience. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/08/senate.election/index.htmlFear the Dems 61 votes in the Senate. They will have a filibuster proof majority preventing any opposition to their agenda. The last time this happened.The last time either party had this ability was in the 95th Congress of 1977-1979, when Democrats held 61 seats during President Jimmy Carter’s administration. Carter faced concerns similar to those today — economic instability, inflation and a 7.5 percent unemployment rate. Remember how successful the Carter years were? Well if you have a Democratic controlled Congress and Obama, then you’ll be repeating the Carter Adminsitration all over again. So if you think McCain is another Bush, then Obama is another Carter. Besides the Dems are knee deep in causing the problems in the first place. McCain wanted to regulate Fannie and he was opposed by both Franks and Dodd.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

It’s almost time kids — the clock is ticking! be in front of your TV sets for the Horrorthon, oh sorry Obamathon!!! Don’t you remember the big giveaway at 9!!! Don’t miss it and don’t forget to wear your masks, the clock is ticking it’s almost time!
I guess Barack and Axelrod have been watching too much Halloween III!
NEVER KNOW WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH OBAMA, AFTER ALL YOU KNOW NUTHING ABOUT HIM!!!!
Hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
So sad!!! Sheep to the slaughter!!!

Posted by: Kellogg | October 12, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Wow!
Now, PA will be firmly going for Obama/Biden. Hillary just nailed it.
So now, which one will we take?
CO? VA? FL? OH?
Any one will make Obama POTUS.

Posted by: zen | October 12, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Truc Nguyen: You might want to take a Xanax to treat your anxiety and panic disorder; you sound a little too worked up “my friend”. Obama/Biden ’08.

Posted by: sawrad | October 12, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

The state of CT has been so successful with a Democratic controlled legislature and 4 out of 5 House members from CT being Democrats + 2 Democrat leaning Senators. Don;t forget we have ‘sweetheart mortgage’ Dodd. In CT the Dems enjoy a veto proof majority.The state faces a $1 billion deficit, ranks 37 out of 50 for business friendly states, saw 3000 businesses go under, have one of the highest tax rates in the country, has the highest gas tax in the country, 32% used for transportation and 60% used put in the general funds, The Dems take CT for granted as they do most of New England and it has not produced results. But you folks keep electing Democrats and you will learn just how bad the results are. I am against one party controlling all parts of government. And Obama victory will let the Dems do anything and you will have “15% approval” Pelosi and Reid, “Fannie Mae is a great company’ Franks, “You should be ashamed!” Waxman, and “Bribes in the freezer” Jefferson running the show in Congress. So look at CT for the chaos that will be done if Obama is elected.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Obamabots again snagged blantantly smearing Palin. You guys really should be ashamed of yourselves.
NYT Pulls Misleading Account of Palin Puck Dropping Ceremony
By Terry Trippany (Bio | Archive)
October 12, 2008 – 15:15 ET
The New York Times took the unusual step of quickly editing and replacing a hysterical post by hockey blogger Lynn Zinser that covered Sarah Palin’s appearance at the Philadelphia Flyers home opener where she was invited to drop a ceremonial puck. In her original post Zinser exaggerated the boos by the crowd, attacked Flyers owner Ed Snider for inviting Palin to the event and appears to have fabricated the discomfort felt by NHL players Scott Gomez and Mike Richards.
That account has since been changed. Somewhere along the line Zinser gutted the original article and replaced it with a new one that came a bit closer to reality. However the repost didn’t occur before the original article shot across the internet where it was eventually picked up by Greg Mitchell at Editor & Publisher and flogged as a “political scoop”.

Posted by: chattyway | October 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Obamabots again snagged blantantly smearing Palin. You guys really should be ashamed of yourselves.
NYT Pulls Misleading Account of Palin Puck Dropping Ceremony
By Terry Trippany (Bio | Archive)
October 12, 2008 – 15:15 ET
The New York Times took the unusual step of quickly editing and replacing a hysterical post by hockey blogger Lynn Zinser that covered Sarah Palin’s appearance at the Philadelphia Flyers home opener where she was invited to drop a ceremonial puck. In her original post Zinser exaggerated the boos by the crowd, attacked Flyers owner Ed Snider for inviting Palin to the event and appears to have fabricated the discomfort felt by NHL players Scott Gomez and Mike Richards.
That account has since been changed. Somewhere along the line Zinser gutted the original article and replaced it with a new one that came a bit closer to reality. However the repost didn’t occur before the original article shot across the internet where it was eventually picked up by Greg Mitchell at Editor & Publisher and flogged as a “political scoop”.

Posted by: chattyway | October 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Truc N.
We here at ABC are alarmed at some of your posts, including attacks/death threats against Sen. Obama, and we can trace your computer information. If you continue to post such extreme views on this site, we will have to take security action against you.

Posted by: ABC NEWS | October 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

It’s almost time kids — the clock is ticking! be in front of your TV sets for the Horrorthon, oh sorry Obamathon!!! Don’t you remember the big giveaway at 9!!! Don’t miss it and don’t forget to wear your masks, the clock is ticking it’s almost time!
I guess Barack and Axelrod have been watching too much Halloween III!
NEVER KNOW WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH OBAMA, AFTER ALL YOU KNOW NUTHING ABOUT HIM!!!!
Hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
So sad!!! Sheep to the slaughter!!!

Posted by: Kellogg | October 12, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

The Republicans put the CON in conservative. Why are they really terrified of Obama? Because he is an expert in constitutional law…you know, the very documents these a-holes have been egregiously abusing, a tradition Palin celebrates continuing. Run MFs Run!!! Run like that chicken s*** Hastert who wouldn’t play if he couldn’t be head bully anymore.

Posted by: timmmahhhh | October 12, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Truc Nguyen,
You could spend your time more wisely by thinking of ways to pay for you and your sister/wife’s children to go to college. Seriously, get out of here with your ignorant, racist, anti-Islamic speech. You’re a sordid, disgusting excuse for an American.

Posted by: David T | October 12, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Obama scams money by growing the government (or foundations) and then siphoning off money for his communist/crooked/marxist/muslim friends…he has done this all along as a member of the Woods Foundation, the Anneberg Foundation, as a Senator and he sure is to continue his scams as a president. Why does anyone trust this slime.

Posted by: chattyway | October 12, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

To ABC News poster…yeah another pretending he’s something he isn’t like Barack Obama pretending to be an honest democrat. The FBI and the CIA will be posting next Truc. It’s America, free speech till Barry hit’s the Koran for the swear in!!!

Posted by: Kellogg | October 12, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The latest RealClearPolitics (RCP) Average has Obama leading McCain by 13.8% in PA. It’s looking more and more like those 21 electoral votes will help elect a Democratic president to clean up the mess left by 8 years of “W”. Obama/Biden ’08!

Posted by: sawrad | October 12, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

It’s almost time kids — the clock is ticking! be in front of your TV sets for the Horrorthon, oh sorry Obamathon!!! Don’t you remember the big giveaway at 9!!! Don’t miss it and don’t forget to wear your masks, the clock is ticking it’s almost time!
I guess Barack and Axelrod have been watching too much Halloween III!
NEVER KNOW WHAT’S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH OBAMA, AFTER ALL YOU KNOW NUTHING ABOUT HIM!!!!
Hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
hurry up to Oct 29th, Oct 29th, Silver shamrock!
So sad!!! Sheep to the slaughter!!!

Posted by: Kellogg | October 12, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

maybe if people paid attention to their 401k’s and properly invested according to time, age, and beta they could’ve mediated some of their losses. i know some people who’ve lost only about 7% of their 401k’s. maybe people should of invested in less aggressive portfolios, we all knew something had been coming for a year, here’s to being greedy like the banks. we knew 6 months ago if you had a fund that invested in pass through mortgages you’d be having problems when the SH!t hit the fan.

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Yeah Biden a career politician and a veteran of Cocktail parties , is a real working class hereo who connects with Scranton. What a loser this guy is.

Posted by: Gregh | October 12, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

McCain has proven he has bad judgment by choosing Palin. I have been online reading the Anchorage Daily News. I was amazed at how many people in Alaska really dislike her and think she is unqualified to be VP and scary to think of her as president. I thought all the dislike of Palin was down here in the lower 48. Not so. She won’t be re-elected governor in Alaska. Back in 2000, I was on the internet telling people how awful Bush was. People on the internet would say “you aren’t really from Texas; you are lying.” Well, I wasn’t lying. Many Texans knew Bush would be a terrible president. We need to listen to these Alaska people when they tell us what a ruthless unqualified hillbilly Palin is. Texas is about to take Bush back. I know all of you will be happy. Let’s also send Palin back to Alaska and let them deal with her. I have a feeling she’ll never get elected again to anything.

Posted by: MJ Donaldson | October 12, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

chattyway: From the New York Times, Bob Herbert writes: “The idea that the voters of the United States might install someone in the vice president’s office who is too unprepared or too intellectually insecure to appear on, say, “Meet the Press” or “Face the Nation” is mind-boggling. The alarm bells should be clanging and warning lights flashing. You wouldn’t put an unqualified pilot in the cockpit of a jetliner. The potential for catastrophe is far, far greater with an unqualified president.” Increasingly, Americans recognize John McCain showed very poor judgement in choosing Sarah Palin to be his running mate.

Posted by: sawrad | October 12, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Kellogg, you are sooooo insecure and ignorant. Beside a pathetic racist.
“We are choosing hope over fear. We’re choosing unity over division, and sending a powerful message that change is coming to America” OBAMA Jan.2008

Posted by: Obama Rocks! | October 12, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

WHY DID THE CLINTONS CAMPAIGN WITH
BIDEN AND WITHOUT OBAMA AROUND??????
I’M AN EX-DEMOCRAT VOTING REPUBLICAN.
I LEFT THE PARTY THE DAY HILLARY DROPPED-OUT FROM THE RACE…….
I DON’T LIKE OBAMA AND IF HE GETS
ELECTED,WE WILL FACE WORST PROBLEMS
THAN WE FACE TODAY………
OBAMA’S VOTERS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE
REAL POWER IN U.S.A……
ALL THE WHITE PRESIDENTS WE HAD,THEY
DIDN’T CHANGE THAT MUCH THE DIRECTION
OF THE COUNTRY….WHAT MAKES YOU
BELIEVE OBAMA CAN DO IT…….
NOT A CHANGE…….STAY TUNE…..
YOU AIN’T SEE NOTHING YET……
THE BEST CHOICE IS:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: Nicholas | October 12, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

One thing to note. Mr. Soros whose interview is on this website states flat out that we have been spending 6 to 8 percent more per year than we have for the past 25 years. Anyone who has been around any time knows all of us, especially the governments;state and federal, have overspent. So, Hillary that means your husband also overspent and might have even accelerated it with his choices to head Freddie mac.

Posted by: david | October 12, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

csh: Everything I’ve read indicates that Hillary did not want to be VP. And why should she?
Hillary played second fiddle to her husband long enough; she wasn’t about to be No. 2 to Obama. She rightly fought hard for the top spot.
If she had been asked to be VP, it would have been smarter for her to say no. If Obama loses, she has a better chance of winning in 2012 if she’s not on the losing ticket.
If Hillary decides not to run next time, she has a distinguished career ahead of her in the senate or in the cabinet.

Posted by: Kate | October 12, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Even if John McCain wins the presidency he’s the most liberal Republican there is. It would be like a Democrat winning. A smart Republican should vote for conservativism and Bob Barr is the most conservative.

Posted by: mary | October 12, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Imagine if Obama quoted a former radical in his acceptance speech who applauded the assasination attempt on FDR, than called for a southerner to splatter RFK brains before he gets into office.
I guess Sarah Palin is off-limits cause she has T!Ts, hypocrites run campaigns like the nazis

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

I wonder if Biden used MapQuest to find his way back to Scranton?
Always gives me warm fuzzies to see these rich people so down with the average people. That is, of course, rich Democrats-rich Republicans are out of touch-obviously.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | October 12, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

It’s not even funny how much better Hillary is over Palin. No comparison. Palin is a phony and a fraud. Go Hillary! I’ll be voting for Barack and Joe come November 4.

Posted by: Former PUMA | October 12, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

mary, you may be right. There are a lot of us conservative Republicans that can’t stand McCain, but he is a Republican. Even Ann Coulture said he was just a RINO, and she wouldn’t vote for him. Even though he’s all we can choose from, I still have to vote Republican even though Bob Barr is a former Republican. Who knows I may change my vote for him while I’m in the dreaded booth.

Posted by: bob | October 12, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

How many debates Obama has to win to be recognized that he is qualified to be the president. How many more falls BUSH/MCCain have to make before their experience will be called mute. What kind experience haters are looking for to make someone qualified to be president? Its time we all wake up, come and join the team to rebuild America.

Posted by: haabcnews | October 12, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Hey Jeff in the windy city. McCain flew Fighter jets so he’s not technically savvy enough for you MACAROON.What has Obama flown?

Posted by: James | October 12, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

James, he’s flown as many planes as your beloved liar, BUSH!!

Posted by: bob | October 12, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

If you will notice the Biden’s the Clinton’s prefer McCain over Obama, each one has slipped up and said so more than once.
The media is truely afraid Obama has lost – and has made up his increasing lead and how well he is doing. Meanwhile Obama himself has said we have a long way to go, gee people guess what more lies from the media.
All people can ever pick on about McCain is that he is iradict, well if you make up bits and pieces of media clips – ya I suppose so. Meanwhile we have Obama saying yo, gonna, ya man, that is a much bigger problem, when there isn’t a teleprompter or a script to learn he sounds like a teen. And for picking on Palin, she is not running for president, and she has not done anything illegal.
Obama is greed, look at the money he has, where is this coming from if the economy is so poor? When has a presidental candidate purchased a minute let alone a half hour of primetime on 2 of the 3 major tv channels. This just shows how out of touch Obama is on the economy, rather than stop taking money and encouraging people to invest, buy homes, cars, and other goods, give me more, and more we can make a difference. It is sickening how anyone can listen to anything he has to say.
Look at all the economists that agree McCain’s plan is far better than Obama – for the bailout, for taxes, for America. Listen to experts not to the media hype!
If anyone is promting fear it is Obama look what his comments do to the stock market.
If you want change from the last 8 years start with Congress and McCain, Obama and current members of Congress are more of the same – more war in Packistan, more economic troubles. The president does not affect these issues alone!

Posted by: Stop | October 12, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Some of you conservetists already belong to F.B.I. Fooled By Insinuation.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Stop, talk about rich, McCain is the 11th richest congressman there is! Obama is nowhere near that!

Posted by: bob | October 12, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

One of American injustice Obama often cried about was his mother sick and worried about paying medical bills. Luckily, most of American women know to work hard and to save money. If they are financially insecure, they postpone their marriage and childbirth. They don’t want to depend on others. This is true American spirit.

Posted by: Julie | October 12, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Why is Biden checking our Hillary’s arm pit?

Posted by: CW | October 12, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Poor democrats ! Who to Blame once Bush is gone ? Only the running dog capitalist hell-hounds.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Stop. I don’t think all the economist agree that McCain’s version is better maybe on fox news but hey people who watch that are hannity f-ers. Ask Warren Buffet who has a better economic recovery plan, not too mention how much cash he personally infused to help the economy, more than any body on the right, oh and its PAKISTAN no c in there buddy, was that your grandma who was on t.v. that told mccain that obama is an arab

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Tell me. Which candidate is more like Bush? I’ll give you some hints … he voted for Bush’s tax bailouts (both BO and McAin’t). He looks like a deer caught in headlights when asked about policy issues (BO). He picks a second in command with much more Washington experience than he does (BO). He has relatively little Washington experience and got hit start at a major party’s nomination convention (BO). They you go. BO, almost takes it hands down. BO = Bush. Yeah. Four more years!!!

Posted by: fraggenboots | October 12, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Uncle Moe: As much damage that Bush has done to our country, the Democrats will be blaming him for many, many years.

Posted by: mary | October 12, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Damn right we’ll blame Bush, you turds still blame Clinton for everything

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Funny how 3 Senators, Biden, Clinton, Obama, who have been in the Senate through this whole mess take no responsibility for it and say it was all the other parties fault. So passing the buck seems to be all the Democrats know. I hoping the electorate has not been suckered by them since the Dems have been in power the last 2 years and have done nothing. When McCain tried to regulate Fannnie, Dodd and Franks, said Fannie was a sound company. What a laugh.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

The tech bubble was why Clinton was able to say he balanced the budget- the government was raking money in. Bush had to cut taxes to stimulate the economy after the tech bubble burst and 9/11 affected the economy.I might add that tons of cap gains taxes were paid during the Clinton years on mutual funs that didn;”t have to be sold to realize a cap gains. If the fund was held why the market tanked, the cap gains were paid but the profit in the fund many never have been realilzed.
Bush also brought bakc the economy with tax cuts after the tech bubble and 9/11. Bush also needed to pay for increased security after 9/11, major evacuations of states and cities after hurricanes, the War on Terror on 2 fronts, and no to stimulate the economy and the bailout resulting from te subprime crisis. With the tech bubble revenues, Clinton had a cakewalk while in office.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

And by the way it was during his (Clinton) administration that deregulation of banking took place. Here is Clintons Comment from an interview: On the Glass-Steagall thing, like I said, if you could demonstrate to me that it was a mistake, I”d be glad to look at the evidence. But I can”t blame [the Republicans]. This wasn”t something they forced me into. I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for [commercial banks] to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/con
tent/08_40/b4102000409948.htm

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

jschmidt: You know the real reason the Democrats haven’t been able to do anything don’t you? The Republican minority has been using the filibuster against them. In fact the Republicans have used the filibuster a record number of times in recent history and your man Mitch Mcconnell is the leader who chose to do it. Now quit making up false statements like other Republicans!

Posted by: mary | October 12, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Are you conveinently having amnesia when it comes to the fact that John McCain cheated on his disabled wife with a drug addicted stripper and then later married her or are you just that ignorant about your candidate?Independent fact check groups have shown that These “ties” you are refering to are “a stretch” of the truth. In contrast, McCain was reprimanded for his role in the Keating 5.Oh and let’s not forget Sarah Palin’s strong moral fiber and impeccable past…abuse of power is oh so ethical!!! And yes, it is relevant since odds are she would be president if they are elected. Check your facts before you talk of ethics and morality because the GOP ticket is full of scandals

Posted by: independent 4 Obama | October 12, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Republicans listen up: There is no hope for you. Surrender while you can. When the Dem’s are in charge we will join the world. Those who believe in hatred of their fellow man because of race or religion do not believe or belong in America. NO PRISONERS! NO MERCY! Well, OK, maybe we’ll let you stay. After all this is America!

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

And after that, only the Counter-Revolutionaries who dare speak against “Change”. The first act will be silecncing talk radio. The Counter-Revolutionaries can’t be allowed to control the tiniest of the Media after all.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Damn Kellogg, calm down! You should take some of those stolen pills that Cindy McCain got….at least that got her through her hubby’s infidelities and will prob. get her through the big shocker loss on Nov 4th! Sorry bud, but at least good ole’ Cindy will have one of her 20 houses to retreat to…but you, “my friend” can retreat back to Alaska and maybe try to get a job as a secretary in Palin’s crooked cabinet (however, I think she only hired people from her yearbook and those who have X ray vision so that they can see Putin flying in the sky)…that is, as long as she’s not kicked out.

Posted by: Shocker | October 12, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

first off the Tech bubble was the personal investor’s fault not to do their due diligence in overlook basic fundamentalist principles in investing. If you invested in a fund and did not do your research and only looked current and past prices of the security, not any ratio and business dirction of that company well, you were having your cake and eating too. and as for the deregulation:
who introduced those bills that repealled the regulation acts of 1980 and how was it voted in the senates and the house???

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

first off the Tech bubble was the personal investor’s fault not to do their due diligence in overlook basic fundamentalist principles in investing. If you invested in a fund and did not do your research and only looked current and past prices of the security, not any ratio and business dirction of that company well, you were having your cake and eating too. and as for the deregulation:
who introduced those bills that repealled the regulation acts of 1980 and how was it voted in the senates and the house???

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Uncle Moe: I sure hope they don’t silence FOX News or Rush Limbaugh, because I need to have something to laugh about!!

Posted by: bob | October 12, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

sorry about the typos its late and and i need sleep

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

dO? Duh!: To paraphrase Jessia Lang: “The day you come to take my gun, you better bring more that a piece of paper !”

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Palin should be questioned about her association with AIP. These people hate American’s.

Posted by: Mark | October 12, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Obamas lead in the polls is a deception driven by the lilliputins in the MSM. A majority of Americans both democrats and republicians, and some reluctently will vote McCain in as our next president.Because most Americans are not sure about Obama and his former associates.

Posted by: James | October 12, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

scranton please dont say you are from here you were kids, you dont know what blue collar workers are you come in once in a blue moon shine all this spot light here like you love it, its great its home. yeah its a election try getting our votes but you are just like every other person you arent a real person from here. stop working in ny or delewear and work at coopers or tmg health for 8 bucks a hour then call your self blue collar or say you are from scranton. i hope you loose scranton bad. we the people need real people who know what its like to be on hard times to run this country we cant have rich peole who lie and tell us what we want and then its all down hill.
george m.

Posted by: george | October 12, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Mary- do you know that Democrats halted any increased regulation of Fannie that mcCain proposed? It was Franks and Dodd. Frnaks said Fannie was a sound company. Do you know that the Dems don’t let out of the committees any bills proposed by Republicans. So yes the filibuster may be the only way the Republican have to control the mess the Dems have gotten us into.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

dO? Duh?: Resistance to Obama is Futile, you will be assimilated!

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

George, your not waitng for Joe 6 pack to run for president?

Posted by: God | October 12, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

lets think about this- Also don’t forget who was in charge of Congress during the 80′s in fact who was in charge for all but 8 out of the last 4 years? The Democrats. The are responsible for much of the regulation leading to the subprime problems. http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=M2QwNDhkZTg2OGYzZjkzM2E2NDEwM2U5OGVkNTc0YzU=&w=MQ== The self-proclaimed angels in Washington will tell you they’ve been working tirelessly to expand the American dream of homeownership by making mortgages available to people unable to plunk down 20 percent on a house. Franklin Raines, the Clinton-appointed former head of Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2004, made it his top priority to make mortgages easier to get for people with poor credit, few assets and little money for a down payment. The fine print to this noble intent was an ill-conceived loosening of standards. For instance, the Clinton administration reinterpreted the Jimmy Carter-era Community Reinvestment Act to politicize lending practices. Under the CRA, the government forced banks to prove they weren’t “redlining” — i.e., discriminating against minorities — by approving loans to minorities and various left-wing “community group” shakedown artists whether they were bad risks or not. (A young Barack Obama got his start with exactly these sorts of groups.) Sen. Phil Gramm called it a vast extortion scheme against America’s banks. Still, the banks were perfectly happy to pass the risky loans to Raines’ Fannie Mae, which was happy to buy them up. In 2005, McCain sponsored legislation to thwart what he later called “the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole.”Obama, the Senate’s second-greatest recipient of donations from Fannie and Freddie after Dodd, did nothing.Meanwhile, Raines, the head of a government-supported institution, made $52 million of his $90 million compensation package thanks in part to fraudulent earnings statements.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Mark, Palin’s link to AIP has been disproven. Unlike Obama’s to Ayers.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

uhm schmidt….Phil Graham introduced the Bill that repealed glass-steagal
do you want the vote count

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Now the question is whether the REPUBLICANS can hold on to their slim hope to filibuster the next four years away.
Many decent people are offended by the use of racism and terror-baiting by the Rove insiders designing the last days of the Bush regime.
Palin’s denials today after the report was published with a clear statement that she broke a statute is incredible. She offers nothing about credentials of decency or honor. Her innocence of one charge of illegal firing does not give her the right to claim she is innocent of all charges, when the legislature, and the Republican majority made it clear that she broke the ethical standards that are in the code of law of Alaska. She is without honor, just lies and denials. And soon there is another lawsuit, by Republicans, for her misuse of a personal email system to do state business to avoid oversight by the Freedom of Information act, and public requests for information about her office. Craven lies and criminal behaviors. This woman does not deserve to be in office, anywhere. I pray that the Alaskan Republicans find the courage to stand up to Bush and McCain and make it clear that the party has some honor.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

And by the way it was during his (Clinton) administration that deregulation of banking took place.
———————
Actually the SEC deregulation of five mega banks occured in 2004!
They were allowed to start lending at a ratio of $40 to $1 withholdings instead of the $12 to $1 that had been the standard since the Great Depression.
Guess which five mega-banks just collapsed?
Yep, the exact ones that were deregulated with the Republican Congress and the Republican President in charge.
Keep watching FOX if you want. But read the Economist if you actually want to learn something.

Posted by: Milton Freedman | October 12, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

And by the way it was during his (Clinton) administration that deregulation of banking took place.
———————
Actually the SEC deregulation of five mega banks occured in 2004!
They were allowed to start lending at a ratio of $40 to $1 withholdings instead of the $12 to $1 that had been the standard since the Great Depression.
Guess which five mega-banks just collapsed?
Yep, the exact ones that were deregulated with the Republican Congress and the Republican President in charge.
Keep watching FOX if you want. But read the Economist if you actually want to learn something.

Posted by: Milton Freedman | October 12, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Tonight one of the major TV networks (not ABC) interviewed A 106 years old American nun living in Italy about the American presidental election and who she was voting for. She said Obama.
For this network, who has questioned McCain’s age at 72, to interview a nun who most likely at 106 does not know the consequences of saying she will vote for Obama, her interview being broadcast perhaps around the world, while Catholic doctrine strongly opposes abortions and have in some instances said politicans who support abortion and are Catholic should not be permitted to receive communion, is evil. How low can you go, C–, don’t think you can go much lower than you have. Your organization is despicable. Not many would be so brazen and mean to pick on a 106 years old Catholic nun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Disgusting C-- | October 12, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Let’s sthink about this: And how many inters did Bush rape ?

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

“What McCain didn’t mention is that he has his own Bill Ayers — in the form of G. Gordon Liddy. Now a conservative radio talk-show host, Liddy spent more than 4 years in prison for his role in the 1972 Watergate burglary. That was just one element of what Liddy did, and proposed to do, in a secret White House effort to subvert the Constitution. Far from repudiating him, McCain has embraced him.”

“Last November, McCain went on his radio show. Liddy greeted him as “an old friend,” and McCain sounded like one. “I’m proud of you, I’m proud of your family,” he gushed. “It’s always a pleasure for me to come on your program, Gordon, and congratulations on your continued success and adherence to the principles and philosophies that keep our nation great.”"
“Which principles would those be? The ones that told Liddy it was fine to break into the office of the Democratic National Committee to plant bugs and photograph documents? The ones that made him propose to kidnap anti-war activists so they couldn’t disrupt the 1972 Republican National Convention? The ones that inspired him to plan the murder (never carried out) of an unfriendly newspaper columnist?”
“Liddy was in the thick of the biggest political scandal in American history — and one of the greatest threats to the rule of law. He has said he has no regrets about what he did, insisting that he went to jail as “a prisoner of war.”"

Posted by: independent 4 Obama | October 12, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

yes and mccain was in favor of the deregulation of those banks, let business be business.. lets look back and warren harding calvin coolidge and herbert hoover see why these laws were there in the first place, its amazing repubs still have the same view of government almost 90 years later

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

The media is truely afraid Obama has lost – and has made up his increasing lead and how well he is doing.
==========
Read any good conspiracy theories lately?
Is FOX news, who has Obama up by 7%, now “in the tank” as well?
Seriously, do you guys spend all day going to “ihateobama” websites to find the “facts” about the next “secret the media won’t tell you” crap?
HINT: Just because it’s on the interenet doesn’t make it true.
(Most of us have figured this out by now)

Posted by: Milton Freedman | October 12, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Uncle Moe, why would I take your gun when I have my own.
I have been brainwashed by the liberals… but at least I have a brain. A clean one.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Duh ! You don’t live in Chicago then ?

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

They’ll do ANYTHING to help keep the Democratics elected. Even Biden has changed his tune to suit the situation.
Sarah Palin challenged Sen. Barack Obama’s preparedness to be president, and used Sen. Joe Biden’s own words against him.
As Biden and Palin debated records on Iraq during the St. Louis debate, Palin noted, “You also said that Barack Obama was not ready to be commander in chief.”
Indeed Biden did say that. In an Aug. 19, 2007, debate among Democratic hopefuls, moderator ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pressed Biden whether he stood by a recent quote that Obama was “not ready” to be president.
Biden said he stood by it.
It’s worth noting that in May 2008, BIDEN CHANGED HIS TUNE!!!!!

Posted by: charles | October 12, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

lets think about this- yes Phil Gramm did introudce the bill and Bill Clinton approved. See his comments from a recent interview. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_40/b4102000409948.htm
MARIA BARTIROMO
Mr. President, in 1999 you signed a bill essentially rolling back Glass-Steagall and deregulating banking. In light of what has gone on, do you regret that decision?
FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON
No, because it wasn’t a complete deregulation at all. We still have heavy regulations and insurance on bank deposits, requirements on banks for capital and for disclosure. I thought at the time that it might lead to more stable investments and a reduced pressure on Wall Street to produce quarterly profits that were always bigger than the previous quarter. But I have really thought about this a lot. I don’t see that signing that bill had anything to do with the current crisis. Indeed, one of the things that has helped stabilize the current situation as much as it has is the purchase of Merrill Lynch (MER) by Bank of America (BAC), which was much smoother than it would have been if I hadn’t signed that bill.
Phil Gramm, who was then the head of the Senate Banking Committee and until recently a close economic adviser of Senator McCain, was a fierce proponent of banking deregulation. Did he sell you a bill of goods?
Not on this bill I don’t think he did. You know, Phil Gramm and I disagreed on a lot of things, but he can’t possibly be wrong about everything. On the Glass-Steagall thing, like I said, if you could demonstrate to me that it was a mistake, I’d be glad to look at the evidence. But I can’t blame [the Republicans]. This wasn’t something they forced me into. I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for [commercial banks] to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

ALL THE WHITE PRESIDENTS WE HAD,THEY
DIDN’T CHANGE THAT MUCH THE DIRECTION
OF THE COUNTRY….WHAT MAKES YOU
BELIEVE OBAMA CAN DO IT
==================
Do I really have to explain to you how this statement sounds?
Yah, you know it.

Posted by: Call it what it is | October 12, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Are you conveinently having amnesia when it comes to the fact that John McCain cheated on his disabled wife with a drug addicted stripper and then later married her or are you just that ignorant about your candidate?Independent fact check groups have shown that These “ties” you are refering to are “a stretch” of the truth. In contrast, McCain was reprimanded for his role in the Keating 5.Oh and let’s not forget Sarah Palin’s strong moral fiber and impeccable past…abuse of power is oh so ethical!!! And yes, it is relevant since odds are she would be president if they are elected. Check your facts before you talk of ethics and morality because the GOP ticket is full of scandals

Posted by: independent 4 Obama | October 12, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

On the 20 year old Keating affair, McCain was recommended to be dropped from the Ethics proceedings because he did nothing wrong. But the Democratic controlled Ethic panel wanted to keep him on the hook because it would look better to have a Republican accused of wrongdoing because the other accused were 4 DEMOCRATS..”In the case of Senator McCain, there is very substantial evidence that he thought he had an understanding with Senator DeConcini’s office that certain matters would not be gone into at the meeting with (bank board) Chairman (Ed) Gray,”"Moreover, there is substantial evidence that, as a result of Senator McCain’s refusal to do certain things, he had a fallout with Mr. Keating.”But the investigation found that he was the least culpable, along with Glenn. McCain attended the meetings but did nothing afterward to stop Lincoln’s death spiral.n the end, McCain received only a mild rebuke from the Ethics Committee for exercising “poor judgment” for intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating. Still, he felt tarred by the affair.”The appearance of it was wrong,” McCain said. “It’s a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.”McCain noted that Bennett, the independent counsel, recommended that McCain and Glenn be dropped from the investigation.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Resitance is futile. Obama says one thing to get elected (and to different audiences in Scranton and San Francisco). The meager record he has says it’s different than all the happy talk. For those who bother to look.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/mccain/articles/2007/03/01/20070301mccainbio-chapter5.htmlMcCains wife Carol:Carol, his wife, had been in a disfiguring traffic accident in 1969, a development that McCain first heard about from an officer’s offhand remark.It took months of operations, physical therapy and convalescence before Carol could walk without crutches.”You might be upset when you see me,” Carol warned him in their first post-release telephone conversation.McCain reassured her: “Well, you know, I don’t look so good myself. It’s fine.”McCain praised Carol’s “determined spirit” and refusal to succumb to “despair and self-pity.”McCain was eager to get home to Carol and the children. His daughter Sidney didn’t remember him.He had no idea what Sidney or her older brothers now looked like. He had gotten little word on their growth while in the prison camp.By St. Patrick’s Day 1973 he was back in Florida.In February 1980, McCain petitioned a Florida court to dissolve his marriage to Carol, calling the union “irretrievably broken.”McCain offers his own post-mortem on his failed marriage. He “had not shown the same determination to rebuild (his) personal life” as he had to excel in his naval career.”Sound marriages can be hard to recover after great time and distance have separated a husband and wife. We are different people when we reunite,” McCain wrote. “But my marriage’s collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity more than it was to Vietnam, and I cannot escape blame by pointing a finger at the war. The blame was entirely mine.”Carol, who remains on good terms with her former husband, generally has avoided reporters interested in hearing her side of the story.In the divorce settlement, McCain gave Carol the rights to houses in Florida and Virginia and agreed to provide insurance or pay for additional treatment she was expected to require.Carol went her separate way, finding work as a personal aide to Nancy Reagan.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

If Obama is not a Muslim—-why did he change his name from Barry Obama to Barack Hussein Obama?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

he can’t blame the republicans for strong arming him into passing the bill,
but you proved my point even more, that was the begining,
phil graham and the majority repub congress introduced legislation that made it alot eaiser for enron to get away with their BS, i wonder if graham’s wife was on the board and i also wonder if Mccain voted in favor of that bill

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

What is going on in this country? Why are we even considering someone like Barack Hussien Obama to lead America? Higher taxes, socialized healthcare, no drilling, bad friends, 9million in earmarks, money from Franie & Freddie Acorn, Resco, Ayers, Flager, lose the Iraq war. What is going on? Wake up America!! It is time to save our country. Spread the word- Vote John McCain. God help us otherwise.

Posted by: Main | October 12, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

McCain helped the economy, when he took from Fannie and Freddie the campaign contribution of $168,000.00 from their Lobbyists, CEO’s, Executive officers and spent it on his campaign. Now what was that Reform Legislation John McCain is so proud of.
Of course the Working middle class employees gave Obama $16,000. for their campaign contribution.
Yet according to the Federal Election Commission and Fact Check, McCain’s statement about Obama with Fannie and Freddie is lie. Obama did NOT except any money from those companies at all.

Posted by: mere | October 12, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

We still haven’t cleaned up Bill’s Mess when he left office. Like all those criminals who he pardoned when he left office.

Posted by: Kevin | October 12, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Hey jschmidt .. you do know that Clinton was unable to veto that bill even if he wanted to, don’t you?

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

The blame for the current financial mess should be heaped on both parties. You can find enough credible evidence to blame the past couple of administrations and Congress in particular. Politicians from both sides are concerned about getting and keeping power and not what is best for the average American. That is why we have no sensible energy policy, we have illegals pouring over the borders, and we are spending money like we have it. I do not think liberal policies are the answer to our problems but Bush has left the conservatives hanging by being asleep at the wheel and so Obama will probably win. It is best to remember that whovever is elected is everyone’s President. I still believe that most of the answers will come from private citizens and businesses and not from the government. What has the government done well in the last 100 years??

Posted by: ms1236 | October 12, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

lets think- and what happenned when McCain proposed more regulation of Fannie? Franks and Dodd stopped him Franks said Fannie was a sound company. The DEMS refuse to admit they are knee deep in repsonsibility for the sub prime crisis. It is hypocritical for them to ignore this. Dodd head of the banking committee gets a sweetheart mortgage from Countrywide and doesn;t know how subprime happened. And you want these idiots in charge?

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

not too mention mccain supported deregulation of the major banks in 04, and one more for you…
in june Obama proposed the repeal of the “Enron loophole” which was enacted from the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, Obama did this as a means to curb speculation on skyrocketing oil prices, which if brought to bush it would of been vetoed surprise, becasue there wouldnt have bbeen enough votes in the senate to overturn the veto.. can’t have obama do something good in an election right repubs

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

The Keating Five never bombed anyone.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

first off your right frank and dodd are in the wrong, but that is only part of the reason, more of the reason is all of the deregulation of business over the past 8 years

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Concerned- well from his interview with Maria Bartiromo, he felt repealing Glass Seagal was a good idea. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_40/b4102000409948.htm
MARIA BARTIROMO
Mr. President, in 1999 you signed a bill essentially rolling back Glass-Steagall and deregulating banking. In light of what has gone on, do you regret that decision?
FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON
No, because it wasn’t a complete deregulation at all. We still have heavy regulations and insurance on bank deposits, requirements on banks for capital and for disclosure. I thought at the time that it might lead to more stable investments and a reduced pressure on Wall Street to produce quarterly profits that were always bigger than the previous quarter. But I have really thought about this a lot. I don’t see that signing that bill had anything to do with the current crisis. Indeed, one of the things that has helped stabilize the current situation as much as it has is the purchase of Merrill Lynch (MER) by Bank of America (BAC), which was much smoother than it would have been if I hadn’t signed that bill.
Phil Gramm, who was then the head of the Senate Banking Committee and until recently a close economic adviser of Senator McCain, was a fierce proponent of banking deregulation. Did he sell you a bill of goods?
Not on this bill I don’t think he did. You know, Phil Gramm and I disagreed on a lot of things, but he can’t possibly be wrong about everything. On the Glass-Steagall thing, like I said, if you could demonstrate to me that it was a mistake, I’d be glad to look at the evidence. But I can’t blame [the Republicans]. This wasn’t something they forced me into. I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for [commercial banks] to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

There are only 2 questions to ponder and when you come up with the answer, you will know who to vote for in Nov.:
1. Does the Americn people want to continue to be a democratic country?, or
2. Does the American people want to become a socialist nation?
That’s it; and it is that simple. The gasoline prices are going down and the economy will rebound in time, but our nation’s status as a free democracy or a controlled socialist nation is in question. You should know that Obama’s mentor was the late, card carrying Frank Marshall Davis, subservient to the Soviet Union. Obama wrote glowingly about Frank in his book Dreams From My Father; read it.

Posted by: Common Sense | October 12, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Wow liberals looking into Obamas money from Freddie mac. Like the blind describing cloud formations. It can’t be done.

Posted by: Kevin | October 12, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Good for them . nice to see the family all back together looking at the bigger picture.
Hillary will get a nice cushy position in baracks cabinet and will be nom by Barack to the first available seat in the supreme court.
Everything in life happen for a reason and i think this makes so much sense .
would be nice if she takes over for harry reid in the meantime starting in the new year
harry should be a good soldier and give up that seat.

Posted by: mary | October 12, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

With so much hate in McCain/Palin and the republicans, I really scared that OBAMA may not live to see the Nov.4 election.
I just thought of this while reading these hateful mails from republicans operatives.
Let me know, if my fear is unfounded.

Posted by: Ramesh mehta | October 12, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

mere- Dodd and Obama are number 1 and number 2 receivers of money from Fannie and Freddie. McCain is way down on the list perhaps 16k since 1982.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

The idea that John McCain has inherently bad judgment use to be more of a coincidence than anything else. But over the course of these last 3-4 weeks, I would say, without question, that John McCain has proven to be lacking in the judgment department. His inability to process, correctly, concerns me. His VP pick is one of many examples. His erratic behavior. He grandstands to score political points at any cost while insisting he puts country first. The lists go on and on. I used to mock him. But I have run out of bad things to say. Maybe the POW experience is catching up with him.
A concern citizen

Posted by: The Truth | October 12, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

With Obama here is what you get-http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/08/senate.election/index.htmlFear the Dems 61 votes in the Senate. They will have a filibuster proof majority preventing any opposition to their agenda. The last time this happened.The last time either party had this ability was in the 95th Congress of 1977-1979, when Democrats held 61 seats during President Jimmy Carter’s administration. Carter faced concerns similar to those today — economic instability, inflation and a 7.5 percent unemployment rate. Remember how successful the Carter years were? Well if you have a Democratic controlled Congress and Obama, then you’ll be repeating the Carter Adminsitration all over again. So if you think McCain is another Bush, then Obama is another Carter.

Posted by: jschmidt | October 12, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I did not know which idiot to quote
Ronald Reagan is friend to Walter Annenbergg.
Annenberg is a friend of Ayewrs he hired him! SO annenberg is a terrorist
thus Ronald Reagan is a friend to a Terrorist!

Posted by: nick | October 12, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

– Wow liberals looking into Obamas money from Freddie mac. Like the blind describing cloud formations. It can’t be done. –
Naw, it was the GOP throwing mud that got people looking.. and it turns out that Mac not only was twisting the truth like a pretzel again, but he actually has received more money from the FMs.. so his little stunt again bit him in the rearside. That’s what happens when you can’t defend your own position on the issues and resort to attacks unfortunately.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Kevin: You should know by now ALL, and I mean ALL of the worlds problems were caused by George Bush ALONE, PERSONALLY ! The democrats are as pure as the driven snow. Just ask them.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

and where are the former republican presidents? both bush’s and the entire current republican administration is remarkably quiet and not ONE of them are campaigning for McCain? why not? of course they support him, but Mccain has to distance himself from his OWN PARTY because they are a disaster… face it, mccain and palin are TOAST! (and i love rubbing it in your faces!)

Posted by: earthisnotflat | October 12, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

and where are the former republican presidents? both bush’s and the entire current republican administration is remarkably quiet and not ONE of them are campaigning for McCain? why not? of course they support him, but Mccain has to distance himself from his OWN PARTY because they are a disaster… face it, mccain and palin are TOAST! (and i love rubbing it in your faces!)

Posted by: earthisnotflat | October 12, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

schmidt your giving me the answer…
clinton said:
I really believed that given the level of oversight of banks and their ability to have more patient capital, if you made it possible for [commercial banks] to go into the investment banking business as Continental European investment banks could always do, that it might give us a more stable source of long-term investment.
that level of oversight was gone in 04 and certain banks really made out and now where are those banks. So your saying Clinton did what republicans wanted him to do… it’s clinton fault vbut republicans wanted him to do it. But there not at fault at all

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I’m in the buckle of the bible belt surrounded by republicans, Free Will Baptists, and pick-up trucks with guns in the back window and confederate flag bumper stickers. I keep guns and a big dog for my protection from these conservetive “Christians” but, by golly, I’m gonna put an Obama sign in my yard and lay in wait for the first one to take a shot at it. I may be a liberal but I’m a good shot, too.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

the dems have 50 seats in the house and leiberman who is your campaigns poster child, and one dem senator whom i believe is out becasue he is very ill

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

i mean 50 seats in the senate

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Claim: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave Obama large campaign contributions, second only to Senator Dodd.
Fact: Partially true but misleading
Reality:
It is true that, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, the second highest recipient of Fannie Mae/ Freddie Mac contributions is Obama. However, these are from individuals who work for these companies, not the companies themselves (which would be illegal). Top spot is Sen. Chris Dodd with $165,400, with Obama being number two with $126,349. McCain has received $21,500.
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
Interestingly, if you look at contributions from Fannie and Freddies boards of directors and lobbyists, who are technically not employees, McCain has received a total of $169,000 and Obama has received $16,000. Combined, McCain has actually received more funding ($190,550) than Obama ($142,349) from these financial giants.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/us/politics/10fannie.html
For additional information, see:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/727/

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Deregulation was to able banks to not all be the same. Many banks were cruel and all paid low interest on accounts. They had no reason to offer better programs to get your money deposited. Deregulation was to give you the workers the ability to get more for your investment. The below prime loans were the work of liberals trying to help those who had no means to pay back the loans . Since liberals are into helping programs and not into the money making programs. they cause the country to fall. We need balance between the two. Environmentalists have stomped a hole in our economy and forcing companies to stop or leave. They support unions who draw more than then companies can produce. So we are here because we have no balance. Being a socialist nation is not the answer. Sorros is working for our down fall. His moveon.org is evil.

Posted by: Kevin | October 12, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

For the guys arguing about deregulation on the banks:
The bill that ultimately repealed the [Glass Steagall] Act was introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA) in 1999. The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. The final bipartisan bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. Without forcing a veto vote, this bipartisan, VETO PROOF legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

banks were cruel wah.. take your money out of the bank and invest with an investment house if you didnt like your rate.

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

If Bill wasn’t smoking cigars in the White House maybe we would not have been hit with 911. We should just replay the 911 tapes on a loop so America can remember how we got here and what we are fighting for- FREEDOM! Barack Obama has always been a far left socialist. He tells you he will lower taxes but just look at his record, that tells the truth. He want’s universal healthcare- where will all the Canadians and Europeans go for there healthcare? Time to save our country vote John McCain.

Posted by: Main | October 12, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

– so America can remember how we got here and what we are fighting for- FREEDOM! –
Then why exactly are we in Iraq for again?
– He want’s universal healthcare –
Nope, he wants to create an insurance company to provide insurance similar to what the members of Congress have. Due to it’s size, it will be able to negotiate better prices, be optional in participation and portable across jobs. In addition, it will save employers providing health insurance coverage an estimated $140 billion a year, which will stimulate the economy, and the increased number of insured patients (estimated 47% of currently uninsured compared to 7% under McCains plan at peak) will further stimulate the economy.
http://www.epi.org/content.cfm/pm126

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Do? Duh!: Biden and the elite will be able to keep their guns. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) got a concealed carry permit from the US Marshals. Of course she’s dead set against us un-washed masses having one. I’m sorry you view your fellow gun owners as confederate hicks-from-the sticks. We are the salt of America. Perhaps you should come down from your Ivory tower to meet us some day. You might learn something about real Americans. We won’t ever shoot out your Obama sign, no mater how misguided you are.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Clinton signed for the deregulation.
Obama as the number three person who received the most money from Freddie and Fannie.
Bush and McCain and a few others tried to regulate it a few years back. But a Dem controlled Congress blocked it.
Both parties are responsable, work together do not place blame it makes us all look bad.

Posted by: steve | October 12, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Do? Duh!: Biden and the elite will be able to keep their guns. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) got a concealed carry permit from the US Marshals. Of course she’s dead set against us un-washed masses having one. I’m sorry you view your fellow gun owners as confederate hicks-from-the sticks. We are the salt of America. Perhaps you should come down from your Ivory tower to meet us some day. You might learn something about real Americans. We won’t ever shoot out your Obama sign, no mater how misguided you are.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Claim: McCain championed legislation that would have prevented the current financal meltdown
Fact: False/Misleading
In his September 19th speach in Arlington, VA., Sen. McCain states:
“Two years ago, I called for reform of this corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Congress did nothing. Senator Obama did nothing, and actually profited from this system of abuse and scandal”
What he is referring to is a Senate bill (S.190[109th] Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005) which was originally authored by Sen. Charles Hagel and co-sponsored by Sen. Sununu and Sen. Dole. It was not until after a 2006 Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Report to Congress outlining problems with the two organizations that Sen. McCain decided to add his name to the bill as a co-sponsor. The bill never made it out of committee (Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs), which was at the time controlled by a Republican majority and chaired by Republican Senator Richard Shelby. The statement about Congress and Sen. Obama doing nothing is true, but misleading, since there was nothing that they could have done until the bill came to the floor of the Senate, which it never did.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Steve your last sentence contradicts your whole previous three arguments

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Thumbs up to the Clintons for doing the right thing. I still don’t see Romney, Huckabee, Paul or others campaigning for McCain. This speaks volumes, to me.

Posted by: Jane D. | October 12, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Hey don’t forget the Korean War!
McCain’s Nasty Campaign that is Obama’s Fault too. Palin would be nicer if is wasn’t for Obama

Posted by: Thinking | October 12, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Earthisnotflat: Don’t you ever wonder why Jimmy Carter is never invited to the democratic convertions.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 12, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Having read some of the post here I can see we are really dealing in the truth. Mere says mccain recieved more from Fannie and Friddie than Obbama–FALSE!! I see dems blaming Bush for the financial meltsown–FALSE11 Obama was second only to Dodd in donations from Fannie and Freddie. It was the efforts of dems to provide lowcost loans to unqualified buyers that led to the meltdown. Bill Clinton has stated as much. Obama will raise taxes on everyone, will cost jobs, will be bad for America. His health care plan will ruin our helth care cost more than ever thought. His unknown quantities are going to be bad when we discover them right after inaugeration. Why does he hide his college records, his white grandmother so much more? What is he hiding. All hail Obama!! The messiah will lead the world into oneness whether we like it or not. Just remember Frank Marshall Davis, William Ayers, Rev. Wright, Father Plugier, Tony Rezko. Look at who wants him elected. Get to know the “real” Obama if you dare then vote for him if you can.

Posted by: 1post3 | October 12, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

** Bush and McCain and a few others tried
** to regulate it a few years back. But a
** Dem controlled Congress blocked it.
A ‘few years back’, Republicans controlled the congress, not democrats..

Posted by: will | October 12, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

1post explain ,if you see were dealing in truths speak up give us a breakdown of how you see it dont be shy, making one-off statements gets us nowhere

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The officials, with organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable and the National Federation of Independent Business, predicted in recent interviews that the McCain plan, which eliminates the exclusion of health benefits from income taxes, would accelerate the erosion of employer-sponsored health insurance and do little to reduce the number of uninsured from 45 million…
…”To some in the business community, this is very discomforting,” said R. Bruce Josten, executive vice president for government affairs at the Chamber of Commerce. ‘The private marketplace, in my opinion, is ill prepared today with an infrastructure for an individual-based health insurance system.”

Posted by: Thinking | October 12, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Sorry to tell you but the heathcare coverage for the members of congress is something that we will never see. Good doctors will go private and you will be stuck with the first year get his feet wet dud. No thanks. McCain makes sense. Give people with no healthcare a tax credit. Yes tax that credit it will still be more than enough to cover it. The people with company paid healthcare will not receive the tax credit. Everybody is covered.

Posted by: Main | October 12, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Hey Bob, the re education camp forgot to mention during your brain washing that Bush was in the Texas air national guard and flew jets. Again what has the technically savvy Obama flown?

Posted by: James | October 12, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

– Obama will raise taxes on everyone, will cost jobs, will be bad for America. –
Same thing people screamed when Clinton took office.. Didn’t happen then, won’t happen now.
– His health care plan will ruin our helth care cost more than ever thought. –
How so? Excuse me if we are unwilling to just take your word on it. Hint: Both plans (Obama and McCain) will cost roughly the same, but Obamas allow more americans to obtain insurance, and will be more efficient in doing so.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122152292213639569.html

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

– The people with company paid healthcare will not receive the tax credit. –
Correct, under McCain, they will be taxed on it for the first time in history, in an effort to shift people to private coverage. And resulting in more americans losing coverage.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 12, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Uncle Moe, I live in the sticks, 12 acres of sticks. I know the folks who live near and I know the kind that drive by shooting signs and mailboxes. I know the real bible reading Christians and the church-goin-pretend-kind. I also know the differecne between the blind and those who will not see and they come from both sides of the fence.

Posted by: dO? Duh! | October 12, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

yeah james that same Bush got moved from the texas air national guard thanx to daddy to a wing of the bama air national guard that was reserved for guard memebrs to get thier final hours of flight time, so his pilot rear wouldnt go to NAM While their he ran a election campaign into the ground and was taken off of it by then time election day came around

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 12, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

** Yes tax that credit it will still be
** more than enough to cover it.
Average cost of insurance for a family of 4 is over $12,000.
http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml

Posted by: jed | October 13, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I see republicans being blamed for the meltdown and this is not true. Do a little research and you will discover that Dodd and Frank right in the middle of it. Bush, McCain and other republicans attempted to regulate Fannie and Freddie and were blocked by Dodd and Frank. Barack Obama recieved more from Fannie and Freddie than any one other than Dodd and he was only there 3 years. I can see he learned the ropes quickly. Since we are on the subject of ropes, why did Michelle get a big raise right after Barack channled money to the non-profit hospital where she worked? The term of dealing in the truth was meant to be sarcastic.

Posted by: 1post3 | October 13, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Palin fired a guy who wouldn’t fire a cop. To make things worse, she lied about it and refused to comply with subpeonas while at the same time proclaiming “My life is an open book” and “I’ve got nothing to hide”. This woman is a corrupt liar and should not be running for VP. Remember at the VP debate she said the VP should have more powers. W.T.F.??????

Posted by: katie butler | October 13, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

i was also being facetious… i am not denying dodd and frank’s role in this but it is so much bigger than fannie and freddie, the deregulation of banks and the insurance porblems arising from those mortgages. lets be real the last time we let banks do business this way we ended in food lines. both parties are to blame get your head of your red rear i acknowledged both are repsonsible, but you don’t

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 13, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

– This woman is a corrupt liar and should not be running for VP. –
I agree, and am unable to understand why the GOP would leave her as a candidate, or why the American people allow themselves to be subjected to this kind of treatment from them. Truth in government, ethics reform, transparency.. Apparently they have a different definition for those terms than most Americans.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Let’s see, I seem to remember that when Clinton ran for President the Republican racists said the same thing. The Democrats will raise your taxes. Yet how is it then after 2 terms in office when Clinton left office the country had a surplus. Not only was there a surplus, but there was job growth. People could afford to buy a home, take vacations, save money. After 2 terms of Bush, we are in the worst economic mess this country has seen since the depression. All Republicans spread is hatred and divisiveness. Mc Cain stood by for an entire week and said nothing at his rallies all the while people in the audience spewed hatred and racism. Only when the press and others pointed out how much hate there was at his gatherings did he only speak up. Again, and Cindy McCain has the gall to say Obama is running the dirtiest campaign she has seen. What a hypocrite. White people take offense when you tell them they are racist. Blacks should not fool themselves. There are white Democrats, both liberal and conservative that will go and cast their vote for McCain, all the while in public saying they will vote for Obama. We all know that this is about race. They can spin it all they want. God help this nation should America decide to put a Republican in the white house for another 4 years.

Posted by: Duncan Mc Cloud | October 13, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

so if frannie and freddie were regulated and they didnt buy these mortgages then the banks and the mortgage houses that did own them would fail, and the government would have to back all of them anyway. we wound up here because of deregulation. almost in a way we should be happy we have a good chunk of mortgages in these 2 companies because having to track them down through all the different financial institutions they were originated in, would be too wide spread to try and contain

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 13, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Bill Clinton may have cheated on Hillary,but he loves her.You can see it in his eyes.And he is very proud of her.But while running for a high political position….it’s dog eat dog.Then when all dust settles…they all get together and gang up on the other party.

Posted by: orangecat | October 13, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The root cause is deregulation that allowed banks for the first time since the 20′s to package mortgages up and sell them to investors. It was the investment banking sector that got hit, which trickled down to the rest of the economy.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

there was a reason a “radical” FDR had banks regulated in the first place

Posted by: let'sthink about this | October 13, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Bush is a fiscal socialist who along with the democrats and republicans have ruined this nation it will never be the same I don’t care who gets elected they won’t fix it. Get ready to become part of the Europeon union in the near future and when the man of perdition is revealed he will fix everything.

Posted by: James | October 13, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Bush is a fiscal socialist who along with the democrats and republicans have ruined this nation it will never be the same I don’t care who gets elected they won’t fix it. Get ready to become part of the Europeon union in the near future and when the man of perdition is revealed he will fix everything.

Posted by: James | October 13, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

liberals want goverment regulation in the boardroom, not the bedroom.
conservatives want government regulation in the bedroom, not the boardroom.
The results throughout history has been profound.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Duncan Clinton was not that liberal and in fact other than social issues he was pretty conservative. Why do you think the far left supported Obama over Hillary? Clinton implemented the welfare reform Reagan always talked about; Bill had a pro-business record in Arkansas before he won the Presidency; Clinton supported NAFTA and he didn’t just sign off on the most sweeping deregulation of the banking industry in 1999 but he also supported it and today still defends it. Clinton balanced the budget but what Dems forget is that Clinton was no far left liberal. In fact I would say Hillary is considerably more liberal then Bill. Bush has been a total disaster, on that we agree- but spend, spend, spend while giving tax cuts and expanding entitlement programs like he did Medicare is not at all representative of a true conservative.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

THE DEMOCRATS ARE THE CAUSE OF THIS FINANCIAL MESS.THEY HAVE COST US, PERSONALLY, ALOT OF OUR HARD EARNED RETIREMENT MONEY. THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK AND EVIL. WE CANNOT AFFORD MORE MONEY PAID OUT BY OBAMA. I PRAY THIS GUY DOES NOT GET IN.

Posted by: Anna | October 13, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

concerned american How do you explain that it was the Repubs who wanted more regulatory oversight on Fannie and Freddie and that it was the Dems that resisted such? How do you explain Bill Clinton’s signing off on, supporting it and today still defending it- the deregulation of the banking industry in 1999?

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

In 2000, McCain complained about Bushs tax cuts for the wealthy, and had a tax platform similar to Obamas. He has since reversed that stand. Here is what he said back in 2000:
JIM LEHRER: There was a suggestion today from some of Governor Bush’s supporters that maybe you’re not really a true blue Republican, that some of the things you support like campaign finance reform and your opposition to tax cuts are more like Gore and Bradley and Clinton and Democrats than Republican.
SEN. JOHN McCAIN: Well, I’m much more like Ronald Reagan, actually, than the present hierarchy of our party. I’m for tax cuts, but I’m for working Americans. Governor Bush wants to give 38 percent of his tax cuts to the wealthiest 1 percent. I want to give it to working families.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/election/jan-june00/mccain_2-2.html

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Do?Duh! Sounds to me like you’d be better off living here in California. Expect for the gun ownership thing.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 13, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

A few months ago Hillary said that Obama wasn’t qualified to be the President of the United States. Now she says he is.
Was she lying then or now? I think now.

Posted by: Oonogil | October 13, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

If the Republicans wanted more oversight over the FM’s, they were in control of Congress at the time. McCain continues to point to S.190 as his trying to regulate the FM’s, even though he did not add his name as a co-sponsor until after a 2006 oversight report which showed problems with the FM’s. And yet that bill was killed in a Republican controlled committee and chaired by Republican Senator Shelby.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s109-190

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

– A few months ago Hillary said that Obama wasn’t qualified to be the President of the United States. Now she says he is. –
And she said she was qualified because she slept next to Bill all those years and heard ‘many of his phone calls’. Not exactly something most would put on their resume!

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

As we all know the nation’s president is a Republican, and was a close ally of McCain’s until McCain decided to turn his back on our current president. Republican President Bush backed the stimulus check because when push came to shove, even Bush realized, at last, that the economy is consumer-driven. Many years of supply-side economics has left us where we are today. Supply-side economics has a history of failure because no matter how much excessive compensation you give to the CEOs of the world, they can’t keep the stock market going without prosperous consumers. As we all know, many Republicans including McCain have pushed for DEregulation of the financial markets, Deregulation was the cornerstone of Reagan economics and has been a cornerstone of the Republican party since then. The deregulation bill now cited as a facilitator of the meltdown was passed 10 years ago, ten years ago when Congress was controlled by Republicans. Also, Republican Bush has been at the head of federal regulation for eight years and I haven’t heard him raising heck about it till the crisis speech with Bernacke and Paulson, so where was the urgency before that. According to the New York Times, the regulation bill McCain now tries to use against the Democrats was originally written and considered in 2005 when Republicans controlled Congress, and McCain was not part of the writing of that bill. McCain did sign on as a supporter of the bill much later in 2006. . Nominally, when a bill does not come-up for consideration in Congress, it is because the controlling party, the Republicans then, did not call it up for a vote. The bill was not voted on, and although McCain claims to be a Maverick, he did not make the effort required overcome Republican resistance and get the bill voted on in the Republican Congress. Clearly the Republicans did not like the bill enough to get it voted on. It was the Republicans not the Democrats that stalled and failed to consider that bill in 2005 and 2006. According to the New York Times, the Democrats opposed the bill not because of the regulation involved, but because of other Republican add-ons to the bill. The Republicans have a long history of supporting deregulation, and it is a fact that the Republicans, as we all know, have a history of trying to support their agenda of deregulation with the slogan “get the government off your back”. So its doubtful to try to blame the Democrats for the prevalence of a Republican agenda, deregulation. McCain says even today that Ronald Regan is one of his heroes.

Posted by: Voter1010 | October 13, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Oonogil: That just makes Hillary a typical sleaze-bag politician, like her husband. She just wants into the spoils.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 13, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

concerned american I agree, I don’t believe Palin is ready to be running any show on a national level right now. Given her short time on the national scene though I don’t doubt for one second her political skills and instincts, intelligence and self-confidence. She just doesn’t have any business next to the oval office today though. As far as Troopergate, my understanding is she broke no laws, was within her rights as Governor to dismiss him and that it appears the issue of her brother-in-law was a factor but not the sole factor in his dismissal. And I should be worried about this? The kind of ethical issues I’m worried about today are the fact that Obama, McCain and Biden all have lined their pockets with money from Wall Street financial institutions implicated in this economic crisis ; that Dodd,Shumer,Dole and all others on the banking and finance committees are in bed with Wall Street;
Frank’s relationship (and potential conflict of interest) with Fannie and Freddie; the fact that our politicians are more inclined to represent their corporate contributors (and you can see evidence of such in all three of these candidates records) then the people they are supposed to represent. Palin’s inappropriate pressuring of a staff member to dismiss (and he has stated he was never directly asked to dismiss anyone and the brother in law was never dismissed) a man who works in law enforcement who admittedly tasered his own child, supposedly drank on the job and threatened members of the Palin family is irrelevent to me in comparison to the influence special interests have had on our candidates, our political system and in the making of this financial crisis.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Since Clinton has a history of effectively managing the office of president it stands to reason that Obama would welcome his input. Although McCain now claims that he is and was against deregulation I checked his website for what his current position on regulation/deregulation is and, guess what, I could not find anything, so apparently there is nothing substantial on McCain’s website, which indicates that “the real McCain” supports regulation. McCain supporters may like to believe McCain is a regulator now, after the fact, but McCain is not. (Obama’s site does address the need to prevent mortgage fraud, and other regulatory issues.) McCain is not in a position to claim any special vision on regulatory issues since just before the current crisis, McCain declared that the economy is basically sound. Stating that the economy is sound is the opposite of saying regulation in critically needed. McCain only jumped on the regulation wagon after the crisis, after the Bush speech.

Posted by: Voter1010 | October 13, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

I would like to know, how everything that has happened over the last few months, falls back on the republican party when the democrats run the house?
I am ashamed of the american people for NOT reading,seeing, and flat out getting all of the information on both parties, before you make a sound decision. I am glad we went after saddam,and hopefully very shortly after bin ladin. We need to keep fighting for everything this country stands for. The freedom of democracy,and the right to the freedom of choice,given to us by our forefathers and everyone that has fought for us in the past,makes this the greatest country in the world to live in.
Before you vote on November 4th, you should read everything you can on both parties in this race. Check out Obamas past, it seems to me that he has a pretty shaky one at that. With all of the associations Barack has had with Ayers,and other radicals. However, put Baracks associations on the side and consider his ability to make decisions on the war efforts,and effectively resolve issues in Iraq and Afganistan.
Rid the world of terrorists and the threat to our country. Bring home all of our brave soldiers in a timely manner,but not with threats in place.
Go ahead and look at the financial crisis; who is it that has us in this mess? Democrats. Why is the stock market going into the toilet? Democrats.
Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. Where is all of the money that they had? and Why hasn’t anyone been charged for this? Democrats. Like I say people check everything out before you vote. Inexperience and dangerous people in office don’t mix!!!

Posted by: paul | October 13, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Does’nt anyone rember Obama’s dissing Scranton as people clinging to God and Guns ? He’s a fraud.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | October 13, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

As for Palin, per the report, she was found to have abused her powers and in violation of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act, Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a).
As for the ‘lined their pockets’ issue, I think that you will find that McCain is the one who supports big business and the wealthy, in both his tax proposal and health plan, while Obama is the opposite, so that tells me a great deal.
In addition, if you go look at what legislation each has sponsored in this session of congress.. the majority of what McCain has supported is all Military related with very little that would directly impact Americans. Obama on the other hand is across the board with issues directly facing Americans, such as equal rights, housing, better health care, better drug testing and reporting, environment, increased fuel economy, alternative energy, increased voter participation in government, etc..
McCain claims to support those issues, but Obama actually does in his legislation.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

– I would like to know, how everything that has happened over the last few months, falls back on the republican party when the democrats run the house? –
Here is a good example. Democrats were finally able to push legislation out of congress that would of, among other things, close the enron loophole. That would have caused gas prices at the pump to almost immediately drop, and would have dropped natural gas prices back down to somewhere near it’s pre-2000 prices (prior to the enron loophole, natural gas prices, which are domestically controlled, not globally, had remained steady for 15 years.. yet in 2000 when the loophole was inserted, they rose 320%).
Bush vetoed that bill.. not once, but twice.
Congress can only do so much when you have a big oil, big business president in office.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Voter1010 What the heck are you talking about? There has never been any love between McCain and Bush and that’s pretty well established. Spend, spend, spend with tax cuts and increases in entitlement programs as Bush did with Medicare is not a true conservative approach. Clinton was more conservative on the economy then Bush was. The stimulus check, and now we may see another one, is a gimmick no different then the gas tax piece both Clinton and McCain supported this past Spring which everyone called a gimmick.
Someone will pay for those stimulus checks we get (and none of us will certainly refuse them) down the road in taxes. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and the most sweeping deregulation of the banking industry came under Clinton’s watch- he signed, supported and still defends it today. Joe Biden voted for it in 1999 as it would be safe to assume McCain did also. In the past decade while McCain has said himself he supports deregulation he also has a history of asking for more oversight and regulation in varied industries examples being the tobacco industry, auto, cable, defense, was involved in writing the Patient’s Bill of Rights with Kennedy and Edwards, worked on campaign reform with the most liberal Senator Feingold in Congress and so on. The fact that McCain has proven himself to be capable of biting the hand that contributes to him is one of the reasons Obama has gotten more money from Wall Street then McCain and that in the primaries his opponents then also pulled in more Wall Street money. McCain came on board in 2005 with asking for more regulatary oversight of Fannie and Freddie and the Bush administration during hearings in 2003 also were pushing for more oversight of those agencies. McCain’s statement in 2005 is record as is the hearing in 2003 and the statements opposing such oversight from Frank and Maxine Waters among others is public record. Obama wrote a letter in 2007, after he threw his hat in the Presidential ring , about Fannie and Freddie but was silent prior. There is no such thing as “control” by any party in Congress for the most part even they are in the majority . If there was Lieberman would have been bounced out by now but the Dems (while they supposedly “control” the Senate) need him to caucus. It was also the Dems who decorated the 1999 bill like a Xmas tree. May I remind you that Obama stood on a podium in PA and told the audience that he wanted to bring us back to the foreign policy traditions of Reagan and Bush Sr. Obama has also expressed his admiration for Reagan (not necessarily his policies) as a politician and Clinton made a point of pointing this out in the primaries. in fact Obama said more positive things about Reagan then he did Clinton (Bill) during the Democratic primaries. Unlike some on these blogs, I don’t see one party responsible for the mess we are in but rather both parties and both parties should be accountable.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

– Does’nt anyone rember Obama’s dissing Scranton as people clinging to God and Guns ? He’s a fraud. –
Here is the whole quote:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them,” Obama said. “And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Voter1010 McCain has fundamentally supported deregulation but also Bill CLinton did and Joe Biden in 1999. Let’s not forget that. The deregulation of the banking industry in 1999 had bi-partisan support.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Three weeks and many of the Rushies and Fox news crowd will be able to see the results, a Democratic President and veto proof majorities in both houses. Spin the lies and spin the hate because it will be over then.

Posted by: outwest | October 13, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Paul,
It’s funny how Republicans will just blindly find a way to blame everything on the Democrats. The Democrats have been in control of the Congress for a short period of time, while the Republicans have been in control of our country for nearly the last forty years. Not to mention that the economy lags significantly behind what happens in the political world, which means it’s very easy to understand how we blame this mess on the deregulatory nature of the Republican party.
Also, I wish I could agree with you when you say that the United States fights for Democracy. We only fight for Democracy when it’s in our “National Interest”. Otherwise, we would have help Benazir Bhutto fight for democracy rather than implicitly give Musharaf (a tyrant…our terror-fighting tyrant) the red light on getting rid of her. That’s just one example–of which many exist–of when we pick and choose when we fight for democracy.
In the last eight years, we haven’t fought for democracy or stood for freedom…we’ve fought for and stood for our National Interests. What a shame.
If we elect McCain, We’ll get “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran,” and next stop Baghdad, etc. We don’t need that; we need someone who will reach out to the rest of the world, win the battle of hearts and minds, and repair our good standing. That’s what makes America so strong, not dropping bombs. As we’ve all seen, dropping bombs doesn’t work that well when you’re all alone.

Posted by: David T | October 13, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

IT IS THE FAULT OF EVERY PERSON WHO VOTED FOR BUSH 8 YEARS AGO! WE ARE ALL PAYING FOR YOUR MISTAKES. WE WILL BE A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY IN A SHORT TIME, GOVERNED BY A SOCIALISTIC COMMAND, LIVING BEHIND AN IRON CURTAIN, WITH ALL OUR FREEDOMS TAKEN FROM US. YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE, I HOPE YOU SLEEP WELL EACH NIGHT!

Posted by: shorelinedr | October 13, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

hey NIun
I’m not sure you know but Nixon was a Republican. And a very bad one at that!

Posted by: dennis | October 13, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

– Also, I wish I could agree with you when you say that the United States fights for Democracy. We only fight for Democracy when it’s in our “National Interest”. –
According to McCain, we fight when our ‘values’ are threatened also! Here is what he said in the 2000 election race:
LEHRER: .. when should the United States deploy its armed forces abroad, and what criteria should be used? Are you comfortable with the decision-making that would – that a Bush-Cheney- Powell triumvirate would make?
McCAIN: Yes. I’m extremely comfortable and basically it’s when American interests and values are threatened. And sometimes when our values are threatened, over time our interests can be threatened. I can’t make an argument to you that Kosovo posed an immediate threat to our national interest. But I can argue that it offended our values to a degree that if allowed to go unchecked, then unrestrained, once Milosevic started to do his ethnic cleansing, then sooner or later our interest would be threaten because that same kind of scenario would transpire in other places in Europe.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/election/july-dec00/mccain_8-1.html

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

concerned american You really need to do your homework on McCain. There are many issues that Obama supports such as universal health care and social issues that I too support. McCain hasn’t been a typical Repub though and has been more liberal on some issues such as campaign reform (which is one of the number one reasons the far right hates him), immigration, climate change and he’s had no hesitation going after special interests
(even if they’ve contributed to him) if he feels it’s the right thing to do. McCain has voted 90% with his party in the past couple years but Obama has voted 97% with his party and if you look at McCain longer history in the Senate and overall record his percentage is lower then the 90%. You can’t argue Obama is more inclined to buck up against his party when he’s holding a 97% vs. McCain’s 90%. McCain does have more rights to claiming the reformist label but having said that I will be the first to admit that McCain in the past couple weeks has disappointed in his selection of Palin and his support of the bailout bill as is. The McCain of past wouldv’e put his first choice, Lieberman, on and wouldv’e not supported this particular bailout bill and would have recommended it go back to the drawing board and come up with something better. He has every right to claim some maverick status based on past record (even Obama concedes on that) and while I don’t doubt his capacity to do such in the White House , these past couple weeks have certainly been a disappointment.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I’ve done my research on both. I don’t vote party line, I vote what is best for the Country. I actually voted for McCain during the primaries in 2000. But he is not the same man today.
As for ‘universal health care’.. please be aware that it is more a government run health insurance company, one which will compete against other insurance companies, yet be able to offer affordable, optional and portable coverage to many who are currently unable to obtain insurance.
I have done significant research on it, and really find it to be a brilliant plan.. compared to McCain who simply wants to deregulate, tax employer provided health insurance to shift workers to private coverage, and give an across the board tax break regardless of income. Like his tax plan, his health plan also favors the wealthy and would result in less coverage for the currently uninsured and more americans losing coverage.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

alpaig52- You are right.Mcain in the past couple of weeks has been a disappointment by all means.It is not the real Maverick people in this country know.He is bullied by the egoist crap politicians in gop .It is time for republicans to lost this election and they should learn a lesson that smears and attacks cannot win them for ever.It worked once and we are paying the price for it now.GOP should be freed from Karl Rove politics and poisonous propaganda by cut loose radio talk host shows on fox tv and else where.My vote not this time for republicans.

Posted by: swingvoter1971 | October 13, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

concerned american The problem with McCain and what he said about Kosovo and ethnic cleansing and our values, is what? We could very well end up in Darfur with Obama in office, and I am not necessarily opposed to such, but the difference is? Are you familiar with the Carter Doctrine? Are you aware that US Central Command, of which Petreaus is part of, evolved out of the Carter Doctrine and the US Central Command is about our oil interests? Are you aware of what’s happening today in regards to Iraq and the oil industries such as Exxon Mobil and British Petroleum (who contribute to both McCain and Obama)? McCain made a gaffe in one of his townhall meetings and said that we need to once and for all deal with our dependency on foreign oil so that young man/woman will ever have to fight a war in the Middle East ever again. Was that a gaffe? He had to retract the next day and go back to the same line that Obama and Bush use consistently and that is waging a “war on terror”. It’s the pink elephant in the living room and McCain was speaking the truth and saying something you hear primarily in the open from your more progressive and liberal individuals. I certainly haven’t heard it from Obama.
Wasn’t it Biden who said how do you solve something if you don’t know what the problem is? They all know what the problem is but no one dares to say it anymore then they are willing to say we need to reform Social Security and Medicare and we can’t implement most anything we promise because we can’t afford it and we may need to raise taxes to get out of this mess and these major deficits.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Sub-prime mortgages (and the meltdown) were made by private businesses. The sub-prime and financial meltdown is a product of freedom to write any mortgages the banks wanted to write, and the absence of government intervention in that. What deregulation did was allow business to do what they wanted to do … make big bucks on sup-prime mortgages. McCain supporters try to blame Obama, Clinton, the government, or whoever they can to cover for the fact that business people took advantage of the Republican influence on the government, (deregulation) and did whatever they wanted to do. It is strange that McCain supporters want to blame the government, Obama, or whoever, for giving banks and other businesses the freedom to loan their money stupidly. It’s like business people are asking, “how responsible could the government be if they let a bunch of kooks like us run our mortgage businesses into the ground, and then they allowed us mortgage bankers to run Freddie, Fannie, the credit markets, the stock market, and the whole country into the ground”. McCain supporters try to connect deregulation (which led to the financial meltdown) with Marxism … and that’s laughable because Marxism is 100% the opposite of deregulation. Contrary to the claims of McCain supporters the stock market is proudly and 100% capitalistic, much to the dismay of McCain supporters who apparently consider market fluctuations to be Marxist. It is a fact that the god-awful ideology of Marxism provides that government controls everything … the complete opposite of the deregulation … Does the McCain campaign now so confused that they confuse Marxism with deregulation? McCain now makes the dicey claim that he supported re-regulation in 2005… does that make McCain a Marxist? It is a fact that one of McCain’s key senior advisers, Henry Kissinger, was instrumental in establishing diplomatic and trade relations with Red China. Kissinger … key friend of the Marxist regime in Red China is to be found in McCain’s camp.

Posted by: Voter1010 | October 13, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

swingvoter I haven’t decided yet. I think McCain has more of the capacity and his record has shown me that he is more capable of implementing the reforms we need. I also like the fact that he will be a one term President due to his age and so the minute he gets in the White House he won’t be pondering his reelection prospects and can truly be the independent most know he is. I’ll wait and see what he comes up with in the next couple weeks. I agree about the Rovian tactics and Palin , while politically smart to ensure his far right base, was a disappointment and a concern given his age. I vote predominantly Democrat but I don’t see McCain as a typical Repub and it has been very disappointing to see the campaign he’s been running in the past couple weeks because he’s far better then that and if he loses , well, he deserves to lose if he doesn’t get back to who he really is.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

dO….I pity you. Sorrrrrryyyyyy!!!!

Posted by: McNoShame | October 13, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

The term ‘war on terror’ is one invented by the Bush administration and has no meaning. Like the ‘war on drugs’ which has failed even with all the money our country has spent on it. It is a term that is open-ended. How do you win such a ‘war’ when you cannot even articulate what ‘winning’ means. The funny part is that over history, terrorist organizations have rarely been removed due to military action. Here is an interesting read you might like:
http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT314/index.html
It is testimony given to the Armed Forces committee in Congress last month, and is the result of analysis of terrorist organizations dating back to the 60′s and how they have been removed. After reading it, consider what the Iraq Study Group recommended, and then look at what the objective of Obamas 2007 Iraq legislation was.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Voter1010 You still haven’t explained Bill Clinton’s support of the deregulation of the banking industry nor Joe Bidens nor the fact it was a bi-partisan bill . You still haven’t explained the documented resistance from the Dems on putting any regulatory oversight on Fannie and Freddie between 2003-2005. I agree with you that the Repubs, and I hate Phil Gramm, deserve part of the blame but I won’t let the Dems off the hook like you are more then willing to do. If you want and expect change then you should demand and expect accountability from both parties and not let anyone- not anyone- off the hook just because they happen to be in the party you support.
That’s not how you get change.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Hillary definately is doing what she has to do to ensure her political career, but everyone knows she and Bill despise Obama. How could they not? the media dropped them the second a FAR-LEFT canidate came on to the scene, not to mention obama accusing the Clintons of racism simply because they were wanting to discuss his RADICAL past

Posted by: dave | October 13, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

– Does’nt anyone rember Obama’s dissing Scranton as people clinging to God and Guns ? He’s a fraud. –
Here is the whole quote:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them,” Obama said. “And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Posted by: Concerned American | Oct 13, 2008 1:20:40 AM
the statement made by concerned American that Obama is a fraud should be studied more. in that quote from the Senator, he was talking about how each administration has failed the small towns, where jobs are scarce from them. it is no wonder that they are bitter because they feel left out. like there is no one who has their backs. that’s what Obama was talking about. not the fact that he feels that the small towns are just plain bitter, but the situation in which they are in makes them that way. that is the change he wants to make. to cover the small towns so that they are not feeling stifled.

Posted by: depblkman | October 13, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

concerned american I do not support McCain’s health care plan. I am more in line with the Democrats, no arguement there. Even though I would say I do have some concern about the government running any more entitlement programs since they’ve done such a bang up job managing the money in Medicare and Social Security and I do believe in less government. I also though believe that not one person should ever have to refrain from medical care because they have no insurance.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

– The sub-prime and financial meltdown is a product of freedom to write any mortgages the banks wanted to write, and the absence of government intervention in that –
No, bank were always free to write any loans they wanted.. however it would have been foolish for them to write bad loans that they would have to carry on their books. It wasn’t until deregulation gave them a way to write bad loans, package them up and sell to investors that the fun began.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Hillary must be hoping for another run after being slapped in the face. There has to be something in it for them. Anyway blah blah blah.

Posted by: Steve | October 13, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

depblkman – I wasn’t the one who said he was a fraud, I was correcting the person who did and providing the full context of the statement.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

depblkman The guns and religion comment I think was well intended on the part of Obama. I think he was attempting to educate those in the audience and meant no disrespect of those he was talking about. Having said that, his comments were detached and sounded like someone who knows little about the population he was speaking of on a personal level and that rather he formed his opinion based on reading ” What’s the Matter with Kansas?”. It was like an anthropology professor talking to his class about a specific subculture. It was removed and clinical . I don’t necessarily think Obama is elitist but for someone to conclude such based on those comments has merit.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

depblkman-Believe it or not I am STeve but my comment is under concerned american. Sorry man.

Posted by: Steve | October 13, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

– I don’t necessarily think Obama is elitist but for someone to conclude such based on those comments has merit. –
Having lived in the ‘heartland’, I can tell you that those sentiments are very real, and sometimes very scary. Not in all, but a good chunk of them.

Posted by: Concerned American | October 13, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

You sounds very reasonable. I agree your views and I am sure you will decide sooner or late who you are gonna vote for.I lost patience with all these crap talks in the past few weeks and I am very positive Mcain is not going to change his strategy because if you watch todays remarks on fox by many gop conservative, they all blame Mcain for not being aggressive in attacks.I dont know what more of attack they need and already some crazy people are talking about killing people.I admire Mcain for denouncing terrorist overtones in the rally .but Palin the alaskan reformed was the one who incited it first in the rally and she hasnt condemned it yet.I have made up my mind whom to vote not because of MCAIN because of Palin.She is too dangerous in spitting out things from her mouth.She is more like a Sean Hannity in women costume.

Posted by: swingvoter1971 | October 13, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Cindy McCains dress: $300 000.
The income John McCain thinks is when you go from middle class to rich:
$5 000 000.
John McCains mortage bailout plan:
$3 000 000 000.
John McCain calls his wife a “trollop” & a “c u n t” in front of reporters: PRICELESS!

Posted by: JoeShmoe | October 13, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

swing voter I hear ya. If I have to hear Hannity say “unrepentent terrorist”
one more time I think I’ll scream. He’s like a broken record. The hard part about McCain is that even Feingold, one of the most liberal Senators, has said that while he supports Obama he doesn’t fear a McCain Presidency because he knows McCain is actually an Independent. I see McCain as an Independent but he opted to not leave the Republican party. Having vote predominantly Dem in my life I expect McCain to take more liberal positions and that’s just unrealistic because he’s a Repub. I don’t fear either a McCain or Obama Presidency in that I think McCain is more liberal then many think and Obama is more conservative then what many think. I am disgusted with the influence of special interests on both parties and am tempted to vote Nader though. Palin, I would have no problem voting for her as Governor (we survived Ventura) but she’s not ready for the VP position. I wouldv’e preferred Lieberman or Ridge but I recognize that the far right already hates McCain and trusts him less then the liberals do so that it wouldv’e been political suicide for him to make those selections.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Concerned American I grew up in the heartland and have lived in urban areas most of my adult life and while I agree some of the mindset of which you speak can be unsettling that can also apply to some of your more urban mindsets.

Posted by: alpaig52 | October 13, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Hillary spend the ENTIRE Democratic primary saying “Obama isn’t ready to lead”…and then there was Joe Biden who stood by his statement that “Obama isn’t ready to be President” — Now suddenly and magically– Are we really supposed to forget Hillary and Biden’s Primary campaign statements and embrace Obama?!!? Hey- I believed what Hillary and Biden told me in the primary, so I’m voting — McCain/Palin.

Posted by: What They Said | October 13, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

What They Said: Well said, my friend.

Posted by: Bogey | October 13, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

The last 8 years weren’t enough! We want MORE! 8 more years! Vote Republican! 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 13, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

Meanwhile, Obama has made clear that he will be president. If many times loudly say something, it will come true)))
http://tubedirect.net/index.php?q=Obama-on-CNN

Posted by: chip | October 13, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Lynn Forester de Rothschild is so right when she said. Watch these two trends..the stock market and Obama’s wide margin. The stock market won’t go up because investors are scared of a possible Obama win. It’s amazing how people can’t see an obvious handwriting on the wall!

Posted by: Adie | October 13, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

The last 8 years weren’t enough! We want MORE! 8 more years! Vote Republican! 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 13, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

If Obama wins, he should consider Hillary for Secretary of State. She could do as good a job, if not better, than Rice. Bill Clinton could also be appointed to the Cabinet or a high profile Ambassador post, like to the UN. Noticed that all message boards, blogs, have rants some based on fact while others are just anger, hatred, perhaps racism. The world, allies and enemies, reads these message boards, blogs, not just American citizens. We Americans should not forget the eyes of the world are upon us, closely, with today’s technology.

Posted by: Lawrence | October 13, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Bushe’s Mess????…Democrats mess!
People should take credit for credit due; and the democrats are due on this one!
THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER,,,TRADITIONAL VERSION: The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold,,,MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!,,,
MODERN VERSION OBAMANOMICS: The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving. CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food. America is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so? Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody cries when they sing, “It’s Not Easy Being Green. “Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant’s house where the news stations film the group singing, “We shall overcome.” Jesse then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper’s sake. Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share. Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity and Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer! The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government. Hillary gets her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a defamation suit against the ant, and the case is tried before a panel of federal judges that Bill Clinton appointed from a list of single-parent welfare recipients. The ant loses the case,,,
The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant’s old house, crumbles around him because he doesn’t maintain it. The ant has disappeared in the snow. The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood,,,
MORAL OF THE STORY: Be careful how you vote in 2008,,,
please do not be deceived by this liar Obama. He is smooth and like “a wolf in sheep’s clothing”. We do not need a socialist country nor a president who is “friends” with our terrorist enemies!!!Wake up !!!

Posted by: Sig | October 13, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis
Commentators say that’s what triggered the stock market meltdown and the freeze on credit. They’ve specifically targeted the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which the federal government seized on Sept. 6, contending that lending to poor and minority Americans caused Fannie’s and Freddie’s financial problems.
Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren’t true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.
Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007. Subprime lending was at its height vrom 2004 to 2006.
Federal Reserve Board data show that:
_ More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.
_ Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.
_ Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that’s being lambasted by conservative critics.
The “turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007,” the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets reported Friday.
Conservative critics claim that the Clinton administration pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make home ownership more available to riskier borrowers with little concern for their ability to pay the mortgages.
“I don’t remember a clarion call that said Fannie and Freddie are a disaster. Loaning to minorities and risky folks is a disaster,” said Neil Cavuto of Fox News.
Fannie, the Federal National Mortgage Association, and Freddie, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., don’t lend money, to minorities or anyone else, however. They purchase loans from the private lenders who actually underwrite the loans.
It’s a process called securitization, and by passing on the loans, banks have more capital on hand so they can lend even more.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html
The GOP is lying to you once again. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae did not cause this financial meltdown.

Posted by: Jim | October 13, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

Who can take the Clintons seriously now – Liar Barack threw Hillary under the bus and now she claims she supports him. Come on, that’s about as funndy as Rev. Wright supporting him!

Posted by: Rob | October 13, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Right, the Dems can fix it. How stupid do Obama and Hillary think the Americans are. 6 months ago Hillary said McCain is a better candidate than Obama, who only gave 1 speech at the DNC. Let’s let nancy Pelosi fix the economy, as Obama just follows her act.

Posted by: Rob | October 13, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

ssues and solutions:
CHANGE:
McCain has challenged both the Republican and Democratic Machines. Obama has NEVER voted against the Democratic political line. Obama wants to change from the Republican political machine to the Democratic political machine.
TRUTH:
McCain is honest about challenges and sacrifice needed for what is best for the nation. But who wants to vote for that.
Obama doesn’t lie. Obama makes “political promises” of free stuff, subsidies, and lower taxes. Free and/or subsidized: health care, education, mortgage payments, and every thing else you think he said. Who wouldn’t vote for that?
In the last debate he now wants to subsidize the economies of the former USSR satellites!
ECONOMY and ECONOMICS:
To pay for this he wants to increase capital gains taxes. Doesn’t he know the 401k’s have lost money big time? There are no capital gains to tax! He wants to increase taxes on big business. Doesn’t he know many are LOSING money or going bankrupt? Where are the profits to tax? I know he didn’t major in math or business or economics, neither did I, but even I know this just doesn’t add up!
WAR AND MILITARY:
He also wants to reduce military spending. He expects free national security? But he expects the military to be ready and able to go into Pakistan and get Binladen. Plus be ready to go into any country where there is injustice like genocide or what ever. Should they use rowboats and sling shots?
AND he wants ALL young Americans, not just the poor, to either serve in the military, or government foreign service or peace corp. How does he expect to pay for this? Volunteer labor? Forced free labor??
EXPERIENCE:
Palin does not have enough experience to be VP. But as VP she can learn on the job. Obama has more experience than… than… er… ahh… Oh Ya! Palin! (Except of course when it comes to an actual leadership position making actual decisions; and writing actual legislation… but what an autobiographer!). I really don’t want my president learning on the job. (Oh I learned I have to increase taxes. Oh I learned when I reduced the military we couldn’t stop the terrorists from attacking. Oh I learned that it was actually the Democrats that caused the sub prime mess that took down the US economy.)
If you vote for Obama because he want to Harvard thats fine. If you vote for Obama because he’s black that’s fine. If you vote for Omama because he’s charismatic thats fine.
If you vote for free stuff and lower taxes, then you’re as dumb as Obama thinks you are.

Posted by: stephen50 | October 13, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Now, Sen. Clinton said Sen. Obama is …right candidate to the PA rural residents. What did she say to them about Sen. Obama in the primary?

Posted by: alex | October 13, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

The last thing the USA needs at this time is an Amateur. There is no time for on the job training. More Socialist debt is definitely not what we need. With Clintons recommending him now there is definitely no reason to have any faith in Obama. Research what and who you vote for, check your resources, do not buy into the hype, think and reason for yourself. Being what one “guppy” called an old f*rt, I have already survived this type situation (Carter), and really shiver at the thought of having to go through it again. Therefore the inexperience definitely concerns me. The Socialist leaning is a big red flag. Obama’s record shows nothing to recommend him. Pretty words and rhetoric may soothe the soul but do nothing to solve problems.
I have been following the so called European Bailout,there is something that really sticks out compared to the USA Scam Bailout. The amount of money difference. Things like 38 billion, 75 billion, 49 billion compared to the USA 750 billion which in three days became 850 billion and in three weeks became 1.8 trillion(plus the85 billion to AIG). And we still haven’t injected anything into the banks. What did we BLOW all that money on? This is truly the GREATEST SCAM IN THE WORLD!

Posted by: Sean Michael | October 13, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Alex – Hillary said those things about Obama because she, like him and Joe Biden, think those Americans are dumb pawns clinging to their guns and religion.

Posted by: Rob | October 13, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Breaking news, Obama has problems, Tony Rezko is now talking to the FBI about his connections to Chicago politicians. You won’t hear about this from ABC news!

Posted by: J | October 13, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Hillary has options here, she doesn’t have to be at the beck and call of Obama and DNC after the way they treated her. It ticks me off royally to see her kowtowing to them. She needs to tell them where to put it and become and Independent. Poor Hillary my butt…I’m ashamed of her current actions.

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 13, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

to vote the GOP ticket you’d have to be a catatonic masochist

Posted by: 9michael99@gmail.com | October 13, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

OBAMA IS LEADING! In the polls, in history, in new voter registration, in fundraising, in campaign management, by every metric possible! Conventional wisdom has always said that you can determine how a president will lead by observing how he leads his campaign and the decision he made in picking his vice presidential nominee! Obama/Biden 08, real leadership for a new generation! What a STELLAR campaign being run by an incredible young, American leader! Go OBAMA/BIDEN

Posted by: CommonSense | October 13, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The most significant change that Obama/Biden will bring to the White House is leadership that actually leads, by changing our government’s strategies and culture so that they have a better fit to the global economy. Obama has an excellent ability to shape a strategic vision of a realistic and attractive future that binds us together as Americans and focuses our energy toward super ordinate goals as a nation. Obama stands alone as the candidate who can frame messages around a grand purpose with emotional appeal that captivates the best in us. Transformational leaders not only talk about a vision; they enact it. They walk the talk by stepping outside the executive suite and doing things that symbolize the vision, the way that Obama performed during the primaries and the way he has run a STELLAR overall campaign. Obama stands alone as the candidate best equipped to demonstrate a Can Do attitude with an image of honesty, trust, and integrity. OBAMA IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! OBAMA 08; Yes We Can

Posted by: CommonSense | October 13, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Hillary has options here, she doesn’t have to be at the beck and call of Obama and DNC after the way they treated her. It ticks me off royally to see her kowtowing to them. She needs to tell them where to put it and become and Independent. Poor Hillary my butt…I’m ashamed of her current actions.
Posted by: samhiguchi | Oct 13, 2008 7:52:33 AM
Maybe she sees that McCain and Palin are no good for this country right now.I commend her for sticking to her principles and working to get her opponent in the primaries elected.
Obviously she has gotten over the loss, why can’t some of you?

Posted by: Jwench | October 13, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

You blind Zero-bama supporters can use all means to blame George W. Bush for the misery that you have suffered (although His Nothingness claimed the Bush and Clinton administrations are the same), but you failed to see that it was caused by an unfit president. For correcting that wrong, you blindly support yet another unfit person, His Nothingness, to be your president.
Economy has periodic up and downs. The question is what preventive methods a President uses, in this case a Presidential Candidate proposes to use based on his judgment, to prevent a 50% market crash.
Zero-bama’s approach is to give you $600 bucks, and promising you to give you yet another $1000 bucks if you elect him.
The reason that Zero-bama is directly responsible, not that he caused it, for the market crash is because congressional leaders have failed to act properly because they have decided to do anything to back up this phony as their choice of Presidential candidate of the democratic party, long ago before the primaries started.
Consequently, they promoted Zero-bama’s cash giveaways, which happened to be a thing that George W. Bush supported. They ignored, dismissed, and ridiculed the competing solution by his then opponents, including Hillary Clinton, to target the real problem in Banking and Mortgage lending, which is generally recognized today.
If Zero-bama had the correct judgment or had the intelligence to understand the real problems of the economy, and to put his country first rather than giving voters sweeteners to buy their votes (as he is doing now in promising you $1000 bucks if you vote for him), it might just have helped the down-fall of US Banks and Mortgage lenders that let to the market crash, and 50% less in your retirement accounts.
If you are too young to have retirement accounts, of course you do not see nor need to understand all of these complicated stuff. However, if your father is among those 95% that Zero-bama is trying to deceive, you won’t be expecting to get a new PlayStation for Christmas. You might be happy to know that your dad is not retiring any time soon either.

Posted by: d0 | October 13, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Wel,Well,Well….. SHAME on all you people that have so many ignorant and hostle remarks when you are the people that don’t even vote. yet you are the biggest screamers on how to run this country well get real ,hop on your space ship and go back to what ever planet you came from oh, and by the way take McCain and Palin with you. I’m sure they would do a better job om MARS.

Posted by: kim hughes | October 13, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

The last 8 years weren’t enough! We want MORE! 8 more years! Vote Republican! 8 more years!

Posted by: pefros | October 13, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

yes its said that republicans never do anything but drown this country!!!Dem bail us out everytime. we need 2 just keep republicans out the white house! so help us god vote barack/biden

Posted by: bob | October 13, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Stephen50,
If you think Obama voters are dumb, just think about how easy it is to get the vote of a McCain Voter. All you have to do is shout, terror, terror, terrorist, terror, terrorist, buddies, palling around, joe six pack, lipstick, pitbull, terror, Hussein, terror, Hussein…and they’re all on board.

Posted by: David T | October 13, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I AM AMAZED IN MY TIME TOO SEE A NEWS CHANNEL LIKE ABC BECOME SO PRO DEM,ONLY SEEING ONE SIDE TELLING YOU WHO TOO VOTE FOR IN THERE SNEAKY WAY,AND THEN THERE IS THE SHOW THE VIEW I AM SO ASHAME TOO SEE WHAT ABC HAS BECOME.I GUESS MOST OF THESE WOMAN ARE [BIMBO,S]ON THE VIEW WAKE UP GIRLS O I FORGOT YOU KNOW WHO SIGNS. YOUR PAY CHECKS.HERE IN THE USA I THOUGHT THE NEWS WAS SUPPOSE TOO BE INTHE MEDDLE NOT TAKEN SIDES,YOUR VIEW SHORE SHOWED ME WHO TOO VOTE FOR JUST LIKE MANY OTHERS I’VE TALKED TOO WHO WERE UNDECIDED MCCAIN ALL THE WAY

Posted by: rev.guiliante | October 14, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

J,
News Alert: You won’t here it on ABC, but you will here it on Hannity’s Nation and Rush Limbaugh–Two wonderful/reliable places to get your information (I think I just threw up in my mouth). So, J, take journalism 101 and you’ll find out how reliable Fox News is and how reliable sources like Limbaugh are.

Posted by: David T | October 14, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

ITS TIME FOR A CHANGE America at it’s best? At it’s worse!
At a time of desperate need, instead, determined greed. The unfair work practices on the part of the primary and top tier contractors of the southern Texas FEMA relief program is not only deplorable, but borderline criminal. Those of us employed blue tarping distressed homes are being manipulated through deceit and exaggerated compensation packages offered up by said contractors. After working for three separate entities, the fiasco being orchestrated by Crown is widespread (Beaumont, Vidor, Galveston, League City, Texas City). During recruitment, promises of twelve hundred dollars plus/week/man is made based on square footage production. This is the picture painted; strip away their misleading brushstrokes and your left with an empty canvass and their empty words.
A twelve hour workday is required (7am-7pm) with no acknowledgement of the mandated prevailing wage per the Bacon-Davis Act. Furthermore, the R.O.E. (Right of Entry) work orders handed out each day do not provide sufficient square footage to earn the kind of money discussed. As a matter of fact, there has been occasion where, as a crew, we haven’t covered the cost of our gas for that day.
We’ve all, in good faith, invested time and money to become a part of this disaster relief effort. The apparent corruption being played out by the “good old boys” must be stopped and the wrongs, righted. This matter needs a champion to proceed to the next level where this program is organized and maintained as a honest commitment to the community at large and it’s economic recovery.
Respectfully,
Randall Barkley
American Diversified Disaster Assessment
Dallas, TX
(805) 861-4540

Posted by: Randall Barkley | October 15, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.