The Note: McCain Plumbs for Message — But Can’t Fix All Leaks
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports in Thursday’s Note:
HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. — If your campaign is clogged, call Joe the Plumber. (Then call him again, and again.)
The third and final debate might have been a good first debate for Sen. John McCain. Scattered across the stage at Hofstra University was the broad case against Sen. Barack Obama — along with a plumber who gives McCain the start of an economic message, in an old GOP comfort zone.
But McCain gave voters an awful lot to digest Thursday night: He played all the angles at once — a lot for a campaign that’s generally settled on one new campaign message per day.
McCain had what was probably his strongest debate night — yet even if there was time to build on something, it’s not clear what that something would be. No single moment (or moment after moment after moment, Joe) appears likely to change the direction of a race that’s shifted clearly against McCain.
What’s left is a campaign running out of time and options — plunging ahead on a diminished map, in a hostile climate, out-spent and out-maneuvered, though not, for a night at least, out-hustled.
Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
ABC’s George Stephanopoulos scores it as McCain’s best performance — and reports that Joe the Plumber (and surely the story his story tells — he’s already been invited to a McCain rally, the plumber himself told Diane Sawyer Thursday morning) may make it into late McCain advertisements.
But Obama’s win on style gave him the edge he came to Long Island with: “Ultimately, McCain didn’t do enough to stop people from voting for Obama,” Stephanopoulos says.
“He really didn’t land a knockout blow on Barack Obama, and Obama appeared very calm,” Stephanopoulos said on “Good Morning America” Thursday. Obama, meanwhile, “won the battle of the split-screens.”
McCain had his best moments early: “It looked like Mr. McCain might, just might, raise the level of his game in throwing Mr. Obama off his,” Patrick Healy writes in The New York Times. “But then Mr. McCain began to undercut his own effort to paint Mr. Obama as just another negative politician. Mr. McCain grew angry as he attacked Mr. Obama over his ties to William Ayers, the Chicago professor who helped found the Weather Underground terrorism group. Suddenly, Mr. McCain was no longer gaining ground by showing command on the top issue for voters, the economy; he was turning tetchy over a 1960s radical.”
Palinesque? “It seemed as if Mr. McCain was veering from one hot button to another, pressing them all, hoping to goad Mr. Obama into an outburst or a mistake that would alter the shape of the race in its last three weeks,” Healy writes.
Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News’ Hope Ditto contributed to this report.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I haven’t this much about plumbers in political discussion since Watergate. It might be apt since the policies of Bush and McCain have sent the economy down the toilet.
Posted by: bhciapol | October 16, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
Mccain needed a game-changer and he didn’t get one. .The American public has been watching him closely these past several months and mainly seem to have figured out that he will literally do or say anything, whether or not he believes it, to get elected. He already proved that he puts country SECOND with his choice of Palin, whom HE can’t even convincingly say is ready to be president. He is 72 years old, with a health history of cancer (including melanoma) and doesn’t mind that Palin is unable to answer questions without a script–and has radical, radical religious views on religion and abortion.
Posted by: Charlotte | October 16, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Joe the plumber, Bob the builder, Jill the nurse will end up paying more taxes whereas Obama the politician, Osama the killer, Ayers the “professor” and Hussein the terrorist will have a free reign over the country
Posted by: vs | October 16, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Joe the Plumber (and surely the story his story tells — he’s already been invited to a McCain rally, the plumber himself told Diane Sawyer Thursday morning)
1.)IN REALITY HOW MANY AVERAGE AMERICANS ARE LOOKING TO BUMP INTO THAT $250K LIMIT? LIKELY LESS THAN 90% SO HE DOESN’T REPRESENT THE AVERAGE AMERICAN.
2.) WE NEED TO PAY OUR BILLS PURE AND SIMPLE. IT CAN’T COME FROM CUTS–AUTISM IS AN EXAMPLE, CUT THAT DOWN OR OUT?
3.) ANYTHING THAT HELPS THE MIDDLE AND LOWER INCOME LEVELS <$90K IS SOCIALISM AND ANYTHING THAT HELPS CORPORATIONS AND THOSE ABOVE $250K IS AN "INCENTIVE"–WHAT A CROCK.
Posted by: Jeff | October 16, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
McCain is too old and bitter; Palin is a rude idiot. Obama is this country’s only chance.
Posted by: Cheryl | October 16, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
I don’t make a 1/4 million per year.
Let Joe Plumber work on McCain’s 13 house.
Obama just won a second house. I voted early.
Posted by: Joe (my real name) | October 16, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Joe the plumber isnt even registered to vote and it’s late to register there now.
Given that an his snark about Obama being like Sammy Davis Jr, I dont think he’s McCain’s best spokesman.
Bob the Builder would be ashamed.
Posted by: bubba | October 16, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Hey Obama, facts are facts and records are records. Remember it, you Socialist Liar.
MCCAIN: Well, again, while you were on the board of the Woods Foundation, you and Mr. Ayers, together, you sent $230,000 to ACORN. So — and you launched your political campaign in Mr. Ayers’ living room.
OBAMA: That’s absolutely not true.
MCCAIN: And the facts are facts and records are records.
OBAMA: And that’s not the facts.
Unfortunately for Obama, those are the FACTS, both about Ayers and ACORN. Obama paid ACORN over $800,000 this summer for GOTV efforts, which Obama now denies, although he did finally admit that he represented ACORN as an attorney in a lending-practices case. Obama did launch his career at a party hosted by Ayers, which is such a matter of public record that I’m frankly surprised he bothered to deny it.
Posted by: Slick Barry | October 16, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
The analysts are being extremely kind to McCain, who once again looked whiny, desperate, and un-presidential. Obama, on the other hand, gave the impression of being a strong, composed leader who is in touch with the American people.
Posted by: Doug | October 16, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Obama’s next big lie came during the debate on abortion. McCain pointed out Obama’s radical positions on the issue, including his repeated opposition to the Illinois version of the Born-Alive Infant Protection Act. Obama responded with a series of lies:
“There was a bill that was put forward before the Illinois Senate that said you have to provide lifesaving treatment and that would have helped to undermine Roe v. Wade. The fact is that there was already a law on the books in Illinois that required providing lifesaving treatment, which is why not only myself but pro-choice Republicans and Democrats voted against it.”
FALSE. During that period, the Illinois Attorney General reported that the practice of abandoning infants born alive during late-term abortions was NOT COVERED by the law. Jill Stanek and others testified to the practice, and the Illinois Senate heard testimony that suggested that as many as 20% of all late-term abortions resulted in a live birth. Obama LIED about the circumstances of the bill; the reason it was being proposed was because existing law was ineffective at protecting infants born alive.
“And the Illinois Medical Society, the organization of doctors in Illinois, voted against it. Their Hippocratic Oath would have required them to provide care, and there was already a law in the books.”
FALSE. There wasn’t a law on the books, and who would be surprised that the people performing the abortions and leaving the children to die WOULD NOT want more oversight to prevent that practice?
Posted by: Slick Barry Strikes Again | October 16, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
No way McCain was good enough
through out all 3 debates.
It is so sad through the
whole campaign, watching McCain going from from the “Super Hero” to “Super
Zero”.
Posted by: FM | October 16, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Why doesn’t the press ever comment on McCain’s nasty facial expressions, rolling eyes, sneers, lizard tongue, rapidly blinking eyes? He looked like a mean, nasty old man. And with his campaign so hateful on the road (especially Palin), I wouldn’t put it past him to have “Joe the Plumber” as a plant in the crowd. Then we have that snide comment about “life of the mother is just a tactic”. Talk about a woman hater! McCain needs to retire – erratic IS the term that describes him best. As for Palin. . .she has had her 15 minutes of fame. Send her back to Alaska.
Posted by: VA Voter | October 16, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
look at dailykos.com for what may be interesting data about Joseph Wurzelbacher and his potential Republican ties.
Not just an average Joe . .. .
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | October 16, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I don’t give a crap who he knows and that should have nothing to do with this electin.Mc Cain was angry and it showed he smirked like Bush, went on to tell us the same ole crap about himself not what he can do but how good he is,He lied about Biden and he is MORE qualified to run this country then Palin Heaven help us …..Who hired Joe to do this in the first place ,,,kinnda like you have been set up .Mc Cain and Palin can go find a day job.
Posted by: indp voter | October 16, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Uhbama was lost withot his teleprompter.
Posted by: geevill | October 16, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
We don’t care about Joe the damn plumber.
McCain has attacks and no plan and totally lost me with “Palin the unaware”
Posted by: forget about it | October 16, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
But honestly the best and most truthful thing that I’ve heard about this election is this
“John McCain looks as if he’s about to drop dead any day. Do we really want watching Russia from Alaska {a island in the state she governs and she’s never been there}, abuse of power to fire whomever her husband is mad at, irresponsibility as a parent by not teaching her daughter to use birth control, making the little boy skip school only to work in an oil field, on and on and on. Who needs this dyfunction in Washington and what does it really say about John McCain & his lack of judgment. The only people who like Sarah Palin is the conservatives (and not even all of them like her) who are blind to the fact she knows nothing. Simply she knows nothing. Alaska actually should feel ashamed letting a woman like this run their state. Glad we have Tim Kaine working for VA!!
Posted by: VA is blue | Oct 16, 2008 8:57:58 AM
Posted by: VA is blue | October 16, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
This may come to bite McCain in the butt as Joe the plumber may be related to one of McCain’s Keating 5 buddies [see bottom of post]
At the least this may show that Joe is not really a plumber but comes from more money than an average Joe.
–Manta.com lists two businesses owned by a Joseph Wurzelbacher of Cincinnati, Ohio: a construction firm started in 1974 and JCC Investments started in 2001, both at the same address.
–Record of Proceedings (PDF!), Special Meeting on a zoning request from Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, October 2, 2006, Colerain Township (?), north Cincinnati: “Joe Wurzelbacher of [ADDRESS REMOVED BY MR. C] is not an employee nor does he do business with them. He owns 118 acres within 2 miles of the Rumpke property. He has lived here for 70 years and not planning to leave. He urges the Board to approve.”
–There is another Wurzelbacher, Richard R., who works in plumbing and septic systems just a couple miles down the road from the above Wurzelbachers.
–Search “Wurzelbacher” and “Ohio” at OpenSecrets.org, and you’ll find $101,650 of contributions from Dennis and Dorothy of Cincinnati, R. and/or R.M. of Milford, Dr. Richard of Cincinnati, Robert and/or Robert M. (and Mrs. Robert M.) of Cincinnati and/or Milford, R.W. of Milford… and every penny for Republicans (though not a one for McCain yet!).
–And now for a journey into the Twilight Zone: On May 16, 1992, Charles H. Keating Jr.’s son-in-law and former senior vice-president of American Continental Corporation of Phoenix, pled guilty to “three Federal fraud counts in connection with the collapse of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Assocation.” That son-in-law’s name? Robert M. Wurzelbacher, Jr.
[You can google this to find original source]
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | October 16, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
What I wanted McCain to ask Obama is simply this, who gave Joe the money? How did he get in a position to buy the business? Did the government give it to him? Of course the answer is NO. Part of the “American Dream” is working for it. A hand out does not spread the wealth from the upper to the lower classes, it spreads the despair from the bottom up. Barak’s tax cut idea is, in this case, just another term for welfare.
As for the comment above regarding McCains facial expressions, just a question, did you see Obama’s face, lauging at McCain’s comments, etc?
Posted by: John | October 16, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
gg
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 16, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Coffee – bet Bob and find a plumber at 3:00 am.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 16, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I take offense at McCain gloritization of Joe the Plumber. To begin with his business will not be taxed, Obama has explained this. And second, if I worked hard to get ahead and finally suceeded, I think I should pay my fair share of taxes.
McCain is grabbing at staws because he is “going down the drain”.
Posted by: cindyct | October 16, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
I think McCain went back to Joe a couple times too many. First use was effective, despite McCain’s emotional tone. After that, it was an eye-roller.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
McCain clearly won THIS debate. Obama didnt bring his A game and it showed.
Middle America can see through Obamas falsehoods and on election day, McCain will prevail.
Don’t be misguided by the liberal media’s attemp to inflate the Poll numbers. They have never meant anything, other than to sway undecided voters.
Obama was flat last night. He is not ready to lead our Contry anywhere.
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
McCain hurt himself badly last night, yet again. He just doesn’t come across as a guy who is in control of himself – well, that’s too harsh. A guy who is in control, but its a constant struggle for him to remain so.
But Morris on Fox had an interesting comment. While McCain lost the debate, he may have set himself up for a tightrope walk back into the race. The reason being that the debate may have framed the issue for the coming weeks – taxes.
In that sense, he may have lost the battle but gave himself at least a chance to still win the war.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
What I wanted McCain to ask Obama is simply this, who gave Joe the money? How did he get in a position to buy the business? Did the government give it to him? Of course the answer is NO. Part of the “American Dream” is working for it. A hand out does not spread the wealth from the upper to the lower classes, it spreads the despair from the bottom up. Barak’s tax cut idea is, in this case, just another term for welfare.
As for the comment above regarding McCains facial expressions, just a question, did you see Obama’s face, lauging at McCain’s comments, etc?
Posted by: John | Oct 16, 2008 9:03:18 AM
*um yeah we did and thats what the American people like. Not to have a temper tan
Posted by: VA is blue | October 16, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
What I wanted McCain to ask Obama is simply this, who gave Joe the money? How did he get in a position to buy the business? Did the government give it to him? Of course the answer is NO. Part of the “American Dream” is working for it. A hand out does not spread the wealth from the upper to the lower classes, it spreads the despair from the bottom up. Barak’s tax cut idea is, in this case, just another term for welfare.
As for the comment above regarding McCains facial expressions, just a question, did you see Obama’s face, lauging at McCain’s comments, etc?
Posted by: John | Oct 16, 2008 9:03:18 AM
*um yeah we did and thats what the American people like. Not to have a temper tan
Posted by: VA is blue | October 16, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
darry: “McCain clearly won THIS debate. Obama didnt bring his A game and it showed.”
I disagree that McCain won, but do agree Obama wasn’t at his best. Especially in the opening questions, but he got better as the debate progressed.
McCain came across as small and emotional – even angry. He reinforced the impressions of him that Republican opponents started defining eight years ago.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Joe the plumber is out to lunch, a plant by the Republicans.
McCain has had his day in the sun.
The “Rocker chair” is waiting for McCain.
Posted by: Lookup | October 16, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
McCain was talking about the health of the mother, using quotes to say that’s highly over the top.
He lost my wife and I. It made me realize that he takes positions without even thinking about the consequences.
Posted by: Dan | October 16, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
What’s with that slurping McCain constantly does?
Posted by: Deep Release | October 16, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Thank you John McCain.
You hit on the republican base, the moderates, and Hillary’s–the pumas.
It’s more brilliant than people can gather. McCain needs everybody…he worked it.
Posted by: HP Boston | October 16, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Hey, if Joe the Plumber makes more than $250,000 per year, he SHOULD pay more taxes! I am sick of these corporate fat cats getting their Republiecan tax breaks year after year. Joe the Plumber, if you don’t like it: “tough sh**t”
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
The Lefty Press will claim (with no evidence except “unnamed sources”) that Joe the Plumber was a GOP plant.
But the Republicans did not plant the Marxist response in Obama’s mouth. Saul Alinsky did.
Posted by: Slick Barry: A New Hope | October 16, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
McCain lost again. It was round number 15, and Obama was ahead on points. All he had to do was avoid a haymaker, which he did. Obama retains the belt.
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Lookup: “Joe the plumber is out to lunch, a plant by the Republicans.”
Disagree on both points. Joe isn’t a plant. He’s a soft McCain supporter with whom Obama had a conversation.
And he’s a guy who would benefit from McCain’s tax plan more than Obama’s.
Any tax plan that changes current tax rates will include winners and losers. That’s just the way it is. And Joe happens to be a guy who is poised to make more than a quarter million a year, and thus would see a tax increase under Obama.
So Joe, like many Americans, will probably vote his self interest.
But Obama missed an opportunity. When McCain was making an emotional argument about how no one’s taxes should go up, Obama should have asked McCain why he wants to collect taxes at all – the obvious point that leads to is we haven’t been paying our way for years, and the government can’t continue operating like it has without sufficient revenue.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
The only way McCain could have won this debate in the media’s eyes…is if Obama walked off the stage crying.
And for those of you making fun of Joe the Plumber, you do not represent middle America with your hatred.
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Dan: “McCain was talking about the health of the mother, using quotes to say that’s highly over the top.”
It was one of the more stupid responses I’ve seen this campaign season. Getting that angry smile, and making the quotation mark finger signs while talking cynically about the “health” of the mother…
I understand what he was trying to say – but he doesn’t connect those dots. He just throws that stuff out there, and I suspect McCain offended quite a few women with that one.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
darryl – the one thing I know about corporate taxes is that profits are taxed, as opposed to total cash transactions.
In other words, the quarter million that Obama says he’d tax is Joe’s take home. It shouldn’t affect his ability to hire employees, because employees aren’t paid out of profits; they’re paid out of operating expenses.
Joe, of course, wants to keep as much of his take-home as he can. But to claim this kills his ability to grow the business doesn’t strike me as a credible claim.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
McCain’s true personality came through last night unlike previously. He is an irascible, angry, nasty old geezer who does not have the temperment needed to manage the many issues before us. The “poor judgment” for which he was cited during the Keating Five scandal was evident yet again just within the last couple of days. He appointed William Timmons to be the head of his transition team, should he be elected. Timmons was a former paid lobbyist for SADDAM HUSSEIN! After the first Gulf War, Timmons lobbied to have sanctions lifted. This, combined with the horrible choice of Palin should make any voter run as fast as he/she can from McCain.
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Okay let’s get the facts out about ACORN for those idiots that can’t see this for what it really is.
This is not voter fraud as Limbaugh and Palin call it… no one voted yet! While I’ll agree they need to stop this fraudulent registration the fact is that ACORN pays people to get new registrations. Some of these people are ripping off ACORN and falsifying registrations so that they make more money. These bogus registrations will NEVER be votes because no one is going to show up to vote.
These ACORN employees are not trying to fix the election they are simply trying to stuff their own pockets with cash. The system is working and they are catching the bogus registrations… matter of fact ACORN is flagging most of these and sending them bundled together so that they can be scrutinized. ACORN has not choice but to send the registrations in because that is the law.
Bottom line the Republicans are blowing smoke once again telling half truths and lying to the American people to try and win an election. It worked in 2000 and 2004… it won’t work in 2008! We must get out the vote to win back America from these self serving lying Republicans!
Posted by: Mike Considine | October 16, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Unflappable Obama. Hoppin’ mad McCain with a No-Brains Palin sidekick. Who do I want in the White House with the red button within arm’s reach? Take a guess.
Country First. Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: ObamafortheUSA | October 16, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
As a republican McCain really is in deep trouble. Let me just say that we will loose. I for one will not support this ticket. Lat night he looked angey non-presidential and offer nothing new. Thats why he los the debate and thats why he will loose come this november. Obama looked calm and presidential. I turned away from McCain when I realize that Palin is just not qualify. Yes shes cute but hey so is my wife and I will not want my wife to run this nation. Sarah Palin is controvertial, abused her powers and is clueless about the real issues that we allfaced. To those will not vote for Obama for what ever reason, I urge you to hold your nose and make the right choice this time around and vote for the best team Obama/Biden. McCain looks and acts ill and the worse scenario will be if Sarah palin gets in, talk about a nightmare!!!! So lets get behind Obama, he is a decent guy and get this nation back on track. Obama is a very smart guy. Not erratic like McCain.
Posted by: Mike -PA | October 16, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
In fact, Darryl, Joe might have more incentive to grow the business faster under an Obama administration, as a tax write off if nothing else.
Joe should keep hiring exployees and expanding at a rate that keeps his take home at $249,000 a year.
I co-own an LLC. One thing I’ve learned is that business expenses are a good thing. You want to minimize your profits on paper as much as possible, and the government gives you a lot of ways to do that via the tax codes.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Mccain on the Aborition Issuse and the way he refereed to Womens Health with his fingers UNCOMPASIONATE, VILE CONDESENDING,ARROGNANT,HEARTLESS, Mccain do you know there are many woman out there that have to decide about their health and there unborn child, MCAIN YOU ARE VERY INSENSITVE WHEN IT COMES TO WOMEN,You know Republicans cry NO BIG GOVERMENT but then you turn around and want the Goverment to tell a woman what she should do with her body, or who a person should love and marry KEEP THE GOVERMENT OUT OF PEOPLES PERSONAL AFFAIRS!!!!!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Why do I see so much name calling and hatred from every Obama lover on this blog?
You people are bitter.
I have not seen one crediable mature, clear thinking response.
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I agree. Have have been a republican for over 40yrs and this will be the first time ever voting for a democratic ticket. Last night Obama acted conservative and McCain acted erratic. I have nothing nice to say about clueless Palin. I dont have any respect for someone who abused he power as a governor. Vote Obama/Biden for the sake of this Nation
Posted by: Marie Ann White | October 16, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Well we all know why McCain is bitter…Hes loosing. Simple, As an independent I will gladly cast my vote for Obama.
Posted by: Jess | October 16, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Isn’t interesting that when the McCain supporters have nothing to offer on behalf of their candidate, they resort to bitter, nasty comments about Obama and his supoorters. Let go of the hatred and name calling. Make just one “credible” mature, clear thinking response, McCain supporters.
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
McCain look angry last night!!! Maybe is depends where to tight!!! What a nasty man.
Posted by: Clara | October 16, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
McCain stated that American corporations pay 35% in taxes.
That statement is NOT TRUE!
Whlie the tax code reflects a 35% rate, the ACTUAL amount paid by the Fortune 500 was LESS THAN 18%.
I pay more than that, and I’m only making $50k/year.
Why do Pubs have a problem with corporations paying their share of the burden in America?
Ronald Reagan RAISED corporate taxes. Is he not the quitessential Republican for you guys?
And screw Joe the, I’ll complain but I didn’t register to vote, plumber. Any plumber making over $250/k per year is not going to get sympathy from me. More power to him, but there are families in this nation that need tax relief just to pay their bills. Anyone making a quarter million per year is not suffering.
But when you have 7 houses and 13 cars, I can see where you would be out of touch with 90% of America.
Posted by: McCain for the Wealthy, Obama for the rest of Us | October 16, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
‘McMean’, you just lost your chance for a tenth house!
Posted by: Howard Gallas | October 16, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Obama = calm, well reasoned, thoughtful
McCain = hot tempered, impulsive, reactionary
Who do you want to have the “football” with the missle launch codes?
Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | October 16, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
While McCain did the best he’s done in any debate rhetorically, his demeanor solidifed his image as “a grumpy old man”. He seemed angry and often on the verge of losing his temper. The rage, eye rolling, smirks, grimaces and glares and his dwelling on Ayers did him alot of damage. His performance could only have pleased the Palins.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | October 16, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
McCain clearly won THIS debate. Obama didnt bring his A game and it showed.
Middle America can see through Obamas falsehoods and on election day, McCain will prevail.
Don’t be misguided by the liberal media’s attemp to inflate the Poll numbers. They have never meant anything, other than to sway undecided voters.
Obama was flat last night. He is not ready to lead our Contry anywhere.
Posted by: darryl from indy | Oct 16, 2008 9:11:05 AM
** and McCain lost the first two. Must mean he’s not ready either~> plus America says Obama won. I thought because McCain was so experienced that he would have better debates than he did but it just shows that what McCain is talking about is things no one is concerned about. We care about the things Obama says and McCain won’t win only appealing to the Conservative base. 40% won’t win an election. he needs to start thinking of pleasing the Republican party and start talking to the people who are really listening. Why can’t he say the words MIDDLE CLASS?? He refuses to tell the American people his plan for the middle class– probably because he doesn’t have one and he doesn’t care.
Posted by: VA is blue | October 16, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Last nights debate was just a repeat of the other two, same stuff we’ve heard for the last year just without all the background noise. I watched the debate and I wish I hadn’t. McCain is bitter, and tired, anyone in Washington for that long would be, he says that Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh air. If I wanted to reassure the American people, especially after the way she’s behaved I wouldn’t use the word air and her name in the same sentence, if you know what I mean. Everyone in politics seems to have emotional and political baggage it comes with the job as with most jobs, the only reason we are more sensitive to it is because the media talks about it 24/7 365 and we tune in, well most of us do. The news has become many peoples soap operas and they are glad for the ratings. Make no mistake, I am for Obama/Biden, democrats just seem to work/play better with others.
Posted by: Joan | October 16, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
In the past 8 years, the wealthiest 5% of Americans have DOUBLED their holdings.
The middle class has seen stagnant growth at best. Actually a reduction if we factor in cost of living increases.
THAT’S wealth redistribution!
Only, under Republican guidance, the wealth is redistributed FROM the middle class TO the already wealthy. The wealthy get to coast on the backs of the middle class American.
If letting the mega-rich keep more money stimulates the economy and creates jobs, why is unemployment increasing, wages are decreasing, and our entire economy is tanked across the board?
Supply side economics is a failure. There is NO WAY to say otherwise. Not by ANY metric used. It FAILED!
I prefer a leader who is trying to help 85%+ of the American population over the guy whose main concern seems to be a plumber who makes over $250,000/year.
Say hello to PRESIDENT OBAMA!
Posted by: Wealth Redistribution??? | October 16, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
three things stand out for me about last night’s debate: 1) the only time McCain expressed outright anger was over Rep Lewis’ remarks – he did not show that same kind of passion or anger about our economic strife or the loss of lives in Iraq and Afghanistan; 2) he sneered at the ‘health of the mother’ in a difficult pregnancy; and 3) he didn’t mention middle class in any debates. He is a small minded, mean, ‘little’ person who is not qualified to lead our country in these difficult times
Posted by: bernadette | October 16, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
So we are suppose to feel sorry for Joe the plumber making over $250,000? Give me a freak’n break!
Posted by: Uncle Sam | October 16, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
‘I Am Not President Bush”..
Presdent W Liberation of the City of Jurisprudence greatest military achievement thousands of years and counting.
In 2003,0n BushW atch the people of the City of Najaf were re-instituted their moral and Islamic authority to govern muslims on the face of the earth establish from Najaf edge to the Bismalla.
Maybe Sen. John McCain or Sen. Sen. Barack Obama will liberate medina from saudi-taliban-foreigh fighters highjacked Mecca in 1925,Flipped Arabia to Saudi-Arabia,then monkeys boarded aircraft as WMD in 2001NewYorkEmpireState of mind.
Intead of liberating Medina 2001 W took a shot @a mountain in tora bora.
The saudiKing should live in the USA.
The people of Najaf Restored in Medina and Mecca would fix with crazy glue the problema of the split in the seed@Arabia&the People of the House retoration of Salaam over the islamic Deen.
Religion and deen appear the same but they are not!
Interpretation the mother of Chaos in religion and arabia Script.Ecoavila go your own way from the city of najaf reporting near the graveyards the saudi taliban crows seek to destroy with all memorials shrines and people@1Time
Posted by: ecoavila | October 16, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Angie, where is your compassion and sensitivity for the unborn child. Do you have any idea how brutal and torturous an abortion is for the baby in the womb. They are either dismembered or scaled to death by a saline solution that turns their skin black. They are not just a piece of unfeeling tissue. Look up the developmental stages of the baby’s growth.Plus it comes out a bloody mess. It is a gruesome act. You have no idea how bad it is and most often extremely painful for the poor child. The little heart is beating by 12 weeks. The fetus has little feet and tiny hands and fingers. if you have the courage to look at the tiny mutilated dead bodies, then just google ‘abortion pictures’. McCain’s compassion is where it should be… on the side of the unprotected unborn infant. Women are not helpless creatures, but unborn children are. They cannot protect themselves. Women I know who have had abortions do it because they don’t want to be inconvenienced. It is a truly selfish act.
Posted by: Fran | October 16, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
I admit Obama won the first two debates. Hardly a direct ticke to the Whitehouse though.
He has the gift of gab, articulate just like that other Democrat who pulled down his pants in the oval office to commit adultery on his wife.
Boy, thats leadeship!
And to think many Democrates still supported Clinton after that.
Doesnt say much about your character, but I would expect that anyway.
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
If Mccain puts a Freeze on spending wont more people loose their Jobs like state workers arent there Jobs like the Infrastracture, Funded by the goverment?someone please correct if I am wrong. now Obama wants to go down the list of Federal spending and see whats not working, and where we are wasting, And where were not. can someone please explain the differences? And does anyone really think Mccain can balance the Budget in 4 years with this amazing Debt?
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Republicans and plumbers – again and again. Probably some kind of anal fixation hardwired in the GOP genetic makeup.
Posted by: rogerthomas | October 16, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I am a small business owner and consider Joe six-pack, the plumber, is wide eyed and badly fooled about the profits he thinks he is going to make. If he can afford to finance a business, pay workers, and all the other expenses involved in operating what he calls a small business and still make a quarter of a million dollars net profit, and remember the tax will be on the net not the gross, I can’t see where he has any complaints about paying a small increase in taxes. Again, this is an indication of how out of touch McCain really is. How many of you small business owners make a quarter of a million dollars a year net? If I could achieve such profits I would gladly pay more taxes. When a person owns seven homes, 13 cars, wear $520.00 pair of shoes and his wife wears $13,000.00 outfits and has over one hundred million stuffed away, I don’t think he know what the middle class goes through. If McCain lived the life of the middle class he would quickly see the trickle down theory that he adamantly supports doesn’t work for us. Joe, based on my income, if you are going to make that much profit I certainly can’t afford you as my plumber.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | October 16, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Maybe McCain shoulda picked Joe the Plumber as his running mate….
Posted by: dem in chicago | October 16, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Fran I agree and I disagree, BUT IT IS NOONES BUSINESS WHAT SOMEONE DOES IN THEIR PRIVATE LIFE,Fran what about all the living breathing babies and small children that have Died in Iraq? Not to mention the Pregnant women? Mccain is not Compassionate about that! Its ok to kill those Innocent children with BOMBS!Not to mention some Iraqi children are living with no arms or legs or half their faces burned from the bombs NO DIFFERENCE JUST WORST THOSE CHILDREN ARE LIVING LIFE BREATHING!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Isn’t it patriotic to pay income taxes? So my only question is, why isn’t everyone paying an income tax? There are at least 35% + people in this country who do not pay an income tax. Why not make everybody pay at least something?
Oh that’s right, then they won’t vote for you!
Posted by: James | October 16, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
mccain had too many wild moments last night. his disdain for the “health of the mother” may stoke the anti-choice crowd, but it repelled the other 2/3rds of america. his joe the plumber comment was almost cute, the first time. by the 3rd or 4th mention, not so much.
or how about mentioning ayers immediately after obama’s call for civility? or mccain’s absurd charges of supporting infanticide?
i’ve never seen a candidate quite so desperate in a debate. almost felt sorry for him for a few seconds there.
obama/biden 2008
Posted by: coreydbarbarian | October 16, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Angie,
Why didnt you mention all the Democrats who voted to go to war with Iraq?
Are they not accountable? Get real.
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Maybe Joe the plumber knows some kind of secret plumbing trick that allows him to make so much profit, mind you, not sales. If so, by hiring more guys, he would stand to make even more, assuming they actually work.
I guess he fooled McCain (no businessman himself) into thinking that any increase to the payroll would come right out of his profit.
By running with that line, McCain has revealed how he really thinks of the Joe Sixpacks doing the hard work out there – they just cost money, profits.
But when greedy Joe the Plumbers whine, that gets his attention.
Posted by: rogerthomas | October 16, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
All of you “Joe Six Packs” should accept the fact that Barack Obama will become the next President.
You people disgust me.
You are sick, racist, war mongers, bigotted hateful people. No you are not ‘people’ you are animals. Animals that need to be destroyed like a rabid dog.
For the better of this country, you animals should be indentified that you put hitler/shrub in office. You should be dragged in the street and burned. You war mongering cowards are quite pathetic and your tirade has come to an end.
Any animal bad mouthing Barack Obama, Michelle Obama or any of his friends and family need to shut up immediately. Deport all of you. Leave! Leave NOW!! America doesn’t want your hateful racist views here.
Take your guns that you love so much and eat a bullet! Obama IS the next Preisdent!
And for the safety of the greatest President that we will ever have, there needs to be immediate legislation to ban and destroy all of your guns immediately! Nationwide sweeps, door to door taking away your manhood and melting them!
Disgusting pathetic animals those rethuglicans. Be gone with you before someone drops a house on you too!
Posted by: rosie o | October 16, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
darryl…what does Clintons bad choices have to do with Obamna?
At least we had a balanced budget and times were good.
Posted by: goodlife | October 16, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Thank you – Lanny. I am not a small business owner and not that great at math but even I figured this out.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 16, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
darrly…Obama was and still is against the war in Iraq.
What is your point?
Posted by: militarymom | October 16, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
darrly…Obama was and still is against the war in Iraq.
What is your point?
Posted by: militarymom | October 16, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
To “Slick Barry”
You wrote: “Unfortunately for Obama, those are the FACTS, both about Ayers and ACORN”.
WHO CARES? – People DO NOT CARE! Get it through your thick head – The focus is on the E.C.O.N.O.M.Y – Idiot!!
Posted by: JB | October 16, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Rosie O-
You always have done a good job showing your bitterness and hatred towards conservative America.
How did you mangae to pry yourself away from all the gay programming being shoved down middle America’s throat?
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Obama’s tax plan-which is basically wealth distribution will give tax breaks to those that don’t need it. I work my butt off every day, commute 2 hours each way to make a good living, that I planned for by going to college and grad school and reaching for the American Dream, and all of a sudden it’s a bad thing to make money? in the same breath. I have a cousin age 42 has 7 kids by 6 different baby daddies, collects Food Stamp, Welfare and Section 8, paying $143 .00 for a house in an upscale Northern VA neighborhood that I can’t even afford, her strategy every year for the past 10 years has been work for about 4 months out of the year make the minimum amount of money needed to file taxes. and then get a huge refund. Last year she made about $5500 , paid about $700 in taxes and received a refund of $4350(not including the stimulus package, which was $600 for each person), these are the people that will gain from Obama’s tax plan, so I guess the lesson to my children should be don’t go to school, get your higher education, and have a good career which earns you good pay because they will consider you elite, rich and whatever else and tax you to death, just go ahead and have a couple of babies and live off the the government you’ll be alright!! . Ridiculous on so many different levels.
Posted by: Karen | October 16, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
dem in chicago…GOOD ONEA. Maybe uf he had Joe the Plumber he could have talked about his achievements last night instead of throwing this “friend” Joe Biden underthe bus.
Posted by: newvoter | October 16, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
And McCain is against abortions. What is your point?
Posted by: darryl from indy | October 16, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
No Small Business owner Profits over 250,000 a year and if Joe the Plumber does then hes robbing his customers so therfore Joes taxes will not go up! enough said!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
you people are not getting the point, whether Joe the plumber makes $250,000 or not, the goal is to grow your business and to possibly make that kind of money, not just plumbing but many other industries. I know people that deal in HVAC that can make $10,000 in one day if they need to replace a system, but they also have to buy supplies and pay helpers, etc. It’s not whether the plumber makes $250,000, it’s the American Dream that he could.
Posted by: Kim | October 16, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Got to tell a short story about who came into my office yesterday. This gentleman came in looking for work and to talk to an employer we had on site. He had not bathed, had on a beat up old baseball cap, dirty jeans and a tee shirt (old and ratty) that said “JOE SIX PACK”. I nearly burst out laughing. We have had 8 years of the lowest moral denominator and 8 years of the lowest intellectual denominator. Lets aim a little higher people. He is black and has a funny name but his has some interesting ideas.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | October 16, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
“Joe the Plumber” goes down in history as the small town “bitter” American who unmasked Socialist Obama. My advice don’t go anywhere near Grant Park on election night. Who knows what will happen when Obama loses.
Posted by: geevill | October 16, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Karen do you make over $250,000 a year do you net that if you dont stop crying you wont see an Increase!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Karen…I guess you have never lived on food stamps and welfare. It isn;t fun, let me tell you.
I blieve welfare needs to be reformed but saying Obama is going to take from you, th college grad and give to the poor is WRONG and plus that it is selfish.
You, yourself, should be helping the poor. Kids that grow up in poerty have less opportunities and are at risk of dropping out of school. We do not need more bums.
This is called being accountabel for others in need. You don’t sound like you know anything about that. I am a gramma raising a grandchild, I work full time and go to college at night. If I get a great job, I expect to pay my fair share of taxes. Don’t you?
Posted by: cindyct | October 16, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
And kim how is Obama stopping that American dream?
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Angie, excuse me. Yes I do net that!! I have three jobs. I am a Benefits Manager by day and an Adjunct Professor, as well as a Consultant. I’ve worked hard to get where I am. I am not whining. I am stating the obvious.
Posted by: Kim | October 16, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Wow Kim 3 Jobs where do you find time to blog?
Posted by: ANGIE | October 16, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Bob Schieffer’s question on judicial appointments produced honest answers from both John McCain and Barack Obama. McCain believes in judges applying the law, while Obama believes in judges creating the law.
McCain gave a clear answer in favor of strict constructionism:
They should be judged on their qualifications. And so that’s what I will do. I will find the best people in the world — in the United States of America who have a history of strict adherence to the Constitution. And not legislating from the bench.
Obama, on the other hand, endorsed judicial activism:
I think that it’s important for judges to understand that if a woman is out there trying to raise a family, trying to support her family, and is being treated unfairly, then the court has to stand up, if nobody else will. And that’s the kind of judge that I want.
Except, of course, THAT’S NOT THEIR JOB. Judges have the task of applying the law as promulgated by coordination between the elective branches of government, the legislature and the executive. That responsibility does not rest with the one branch of government that is UNACCOUNTABLE to the voters. That design intends to keep the US from being ruled by lifetime-tenured star chambers with no recourse left available to the electorate.
Posted by: I'm Barack Obama, and I Approve This Judicial Activism | October 16, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
cindyt-I know about living on food stamps. I was raised by my Grandmother, who raised myself and three other cousins, there were times when things got tough and she had to have assistance by way of food stamps, but that was a last resort and she in no way tried to scam the system. I don’t have a problem with people that fall on hard times, we all do at one time or the other, but to purposely scam the system and use it as a crutch to be lazy is unacceptable, and to see people use their kids to do this and still not do for the kids, it’s downright criminal, and by the way I took what I saw growing up and decided that I would have a better life. My Grandmother did her best and she worked and cleaned other peoples houses and she made sure that we were clean, fed and that we took our education serious and those were the things that made me reach for more, so yes I do know what it’s like and I do help the poor. I do it by way of my Church Outreach, donating my time to helping young women on the system learn how to search for jobs and how to handle themselves on interviews,etc. I could go on and on, but that’s not the point. The point is I made a choice and my choice and my decisions have shaped my life.
Posted by: Karen | October 16, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Angie- It’s called multi-tasking honey
Posted by: Kim | October 16, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Kim proud of ya!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Kim, explain to me exactly how Obama’s plan to raise taxes on people making more than a quarter million will prevent Joe from growing his business.
I see the exact opposite. Joe will have an incentive to decrease his take-home from over a quarter million to under a quarter million, and every small business owner knows you can do that by increasing your expenses.
In other words, if Joe hires enough people or buys enough new plumbing vans, his take home will drop into the lower tax bracket, right?
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
To expand this further, isn’t it the Bush/McCain approach to taxation that stifles small business growth?
I mean if the rich aren’t taxed much, then small business owners have less incentive to increase their operating expenses and more incentive to take cash out of the business for immediate personal lifestyle increases.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
unbelievable, so now because an American Citizen (Joe) ask a simple question and question the Messiah Obama, his militia is out digging up dirt on this man because he does not agree with him, so far according to the Lemmings, he is not registered to vote and he is somehow associated with Keating, what next? Is this what we will have to live through for 4-8 years with an Obama Presidency? if you don’t agree with him you are A. Racist or they will dig into your personal information and try to use it against y ou to shut you up? This is what the American people are setting themselves up for unbelievable.
Posted by: Kim | October 16, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Spreading wealth is nothing new. It has been practiced somewhere else.
Spreading wealth is neither bad nor good. It can not go extreme either way.
If more middle-class become poor, Obama will win.
If more poors become middle-class, McCain will win.
Sounds ridiculous?
Keep in mind that it is all about individual or group interest.
Many great ones have come and gone. No one has ever changed such mind.
So following God rather than being God.
Well, in fast-paced growing global economy today,
Americans should be given more choices.
Immigration never means one-way.
Posted by: jy2008 | October 16, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Ok, I am a 36 year female average american. I voted Bush twice. At the beginning of this “run for president” I knew that I was really going to have to pay attention. Things have gone wrong over the past 8 years and I needed to hear what McCain would do different. After seeing him in action I was even more unsure. I mean the guy is 72(I’m pretty sure that is right) he has to make it 4 years. He seems to lose it when confronted or frustrated. Then he goes and chooses Palin for running mate, is he even in his right mind now??My friends and I tease over choosing the least evil, but after last nights debate, I have to say my support is for Obama, no I don’t agree with everything he plans to do, but I agree with more issues than not. McCain he looked made up, scripted, just like Palin does, and their “cutesy” comments they use to relate to average American, well it all looks so fake. I had my 12 year old son watch the debate for a little while and then I asked him who looked more trust worthy and would serve as president. His answer..Obama, he said McCain looked “freaky” and scared. Ummm..that’s coming from a 12 year old boy. And what was that all about Autism, I thought it was Down Syndrome, and wouldn’t that be a special interest just because of Palin? What about all the kids with diabetes, cancer, why would Autism be so special?? My son has ADD, at this point I think Obama has more to offer that would help him and many of the other kids out there. I think Autism, although sad, is something minor compared to what else plagues children. Abortion issue, this is America and there should be a choice. If you are against it, then don’t do it, but at least you had a choice. With a choice now, how many times do we hear about a newborn abandoned to die in a dumpster, side of the road, school bathrooms, without abortion how many more of those horrific stories would we hear about. Sure the mother would face charges, but that would all cost money. Republican or not I have always been Pro-Choice. Joe the plumber, I think his a joke too. A plant from the McCain campaign. McCain spent too much time on him otherwise.
Posted by: it's a circus | October 16, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Thanks for pointing out thats what the Republicans have been doing to Obama since the Democratic Primaries!Digging and Digging every thing they can, Going so far to even destroy the mans name and Reputation so sweetie dont sit there and claim the Republicans are Innocent and holy Americans are Smarter then that!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
WHAT A SHOCKER!
In the final debate of October 15, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama talked more like Republicans George Bush and Herbert Hoover. Barack Hussein Obama related to growing the federal government, raising taxes and trade restrictions. Barack Hussein Obama says he is not repeating the last eight years of the Bush administration, but talks like President Bush. If Barack Hussein Obama becomes president, he says he will repeat the acts of Herbert Hoover (raising taxes and trade restrictions) that led America into the Great Depression. This is Barack Hussein Obama’s agenda.
John McCain and Sarah Palin have a much better understanding of how America can survive the financial crisis. John McCain and Sarah Palin do not talk like a George Bush and a Herbert Hoover.
You had better do some real thinking before you pull that lever.
WE HAVE EVERY WORD IN COMPUTER MEMORY
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Kim, I noticed you never answered the question.
Which approach to taxation – Obama’s or Bush/McCain’s – helps promote small business growth?
Seems to me Obama gives small business owners an incentive to keep money in the business, buy new equipment, hire new employees, as a means of increasing expenses and thus dropping themselves into lower tax brackets.
Also seems to me Bush and McCain give small business owners an incentive to take money out of the business for the sake of immediate personal lifestyle changes.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Charlotte: McCain’s issue on abortion is right. He is pro-life and that’s the way everyone in this country should be. If you have children and you don’t like his pro-life views then why didn’t you get an abortion. Obama is the worst candidate this country ever had running for the presidency. He has close ties to a terrorist and a crook that may be going to jail shortly. Obama was an attorney for Rezko and knows all about his deals. But after Rezko was indicted Obama turned his cheek the other way. Rezko paid for half of that house Obama owns and the lot. Is that what friends are all about. Obama is a crook himself.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 16, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
No one has the right to that which is mine, not the government and not you. As the plumber said, there is no reason for you to take that for which I work. I worked hard for fifty-two years and invested wisely and I begrudged every cent I had to give for taxes. I know that government like that proposed by Barack Obama will give away my money to programs that waste my money.
Look at MicroSoft and the thousands of good paying jobs the company created. MicroSoft more than paid their fare share by over-taxation. Government is the biggest waste of money. Government like that proposed by Barack Obama will waste more money than ever.
Keep out of my pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
McCain’s use of sarcasm is really toxic. He poisons relationships and conversation. Is this how he will approach world leaders? …………
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/10/16/note-to-mccain-sarcasm-is-toxic/
Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | October 16, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Independent Voter: Well, I guess all the Obama supporters really got a good taste of Joe the Plumber and I can bet he is not voting for Obama. McCain has the best economic plan that would help the American people. Obama’s would ruin this country.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 16, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Business, small or big, does not need interference from the Barrack Obama’s tax program. Properly run business do not need incentives, business needs government to keep out of the way. Barack Obama is not a business man and knows nothing of financing a business. He sits there and says what he wants to do with business taxes he collects. Government is has and always be the worse run operation in the world. Government throws billions of dollars after their failings to try to correct a problem they created. The financial crisis proves my point.
Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton wanted every American to own a property whether they could afford it or not. If the banks did not give a person a loan with bad credit and no way to repay the debt, then the bank could face a law suit. Now we have to pay for two idiot presidents’ stupid regulations. Hillary Clinton has the audacity to state; President Bush made the financial mess. Her husband was too busy getting BJ’s to notice the financial mess he was creating.
Barack Obama wants to grow government bigger than it is. It is time to shrink government to a size where everyone can see what the hell is going on with our tax dollars.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
My husband is in finance and works on Wall St. He is an independent but said Obama has the economic plan that will work best not McCain’s.
Posted by: ll | October 16, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
We have expert financial advisers and some brokers that have joined with us and they say, “SHRINK GOVERNMENT“.
Barack Obama wants to grow government bigger than it is. It is time to shrink government to a size where everyone can see what the hell is going on with our tax dollars.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Independent Voters: “Business, small or big, does not need interference from the Barrack Obama’s tax program. Properly run business do not need incentives.”
Not an argument rooted in reality. Both the Obama and McCain approach provide small business owners with incentives.
One approach gives them an incentive to keep cash in the business. The other gives them an incentive to take it out for personal use.
If you are philosophically opposed to tax-based incentives, I’m guessing you also want to see the home mortgage interest-payment deduction taken out of the tax code?
Or maybe we shouldn’t be allowed to deduct our charities anymore, because dogonit, that’s just a tax incentive to give more to charities.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Mariann Pepitone: “Paul – Are you smoking Obama’s pot that he has leftover? Obama wants to raise taxes on people making $250,000 which includes small businesses. McCain will not raise the taxes.”
I’m not sure you understand what’s being said in this conversation.
Its because Obama wants to raise taxes on those making more than $250,000 that highly succesful small business owners who could take home that kind of profit will have an incentive to keep more money in their businesses.
Its McCain’s approach that gives an incentive to these folks to take money out of the business for their personal use.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Some posters like to talk about a presidential candidate’s age, but age is really a misconception for some people.
On a Barbara Walters special, we saw a 103-year-old woman caring for her seriously-ill 80-year-old daughter, who later died. Barbara Walters even visited a centenarian club, where people over 100 years of age congregated so they could meet others in their age group.
President John Tyler had eight children with Letitia, and seven with Julia. Their child, Pearl, was conceived when Tyler was 70 years old.
Ageless Advice on Making the Rest of Your Life the Best of Your Life by Art Linkletter and Mark Victor Hansen. “They celebrated Art Linkletter’s 94th birthday by beginning their 50-city book-promotion media tour. There was about dozen media interviews they had planned for this muggy 100-degree day. Art had just walked up 35 flights of stairs and he was in his usual humorous form. The synergy between these two dynamic coauthors creates an absolutely contagious and ageless energy that will make you look forward to your senior years. Whether you’re 24, 44, or 94, the myths you’ve been holding onto about growing old have gotten old. I loved the book myself and I’m sure you’ll want a copy for yourself and any senior in your life“.
I am 70-years-old and I have a son 8-years-old, a daughter 5-years-old and a daughter 3-years-old. We have other Independent Voters with us that are in there eighties and they are very active in community affairs.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
independent voters: “No one has the right to that which is mine, not the government and not you. As the plumber said, there is no reason for you to take that for which I work.”
So you’re saying you are philosophically opposed to all taxation?
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Lol, I guess the tax argument is working for Obama, as McCain supporters now seem to want to change the subject to their candidate’s age.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Paul:
It is you that do not understand that we do not need Barack Obama’s tax incentives. We need Barack Obama to get the hell out of our business. SHRINK GOVERNMENT
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
MARIANNE PERTTOTPO
THE COUNTRY HAS NO PLACE FOR YOUR RACISIT DIVISE ATTACKS YOU MY FRIEND ARE PATHETIC!
Posted by: Angie | October 16, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Paul:
We want government to SHRINK. Barack Obama wants to grow government. Government wastes are no longer acceptable by a vast majority in the older taxpayers groups. Soon the young will come to realize that people do not need BIG government. People need a government that operates in an efficient way.
Taxes are needed, but the spending must be better controlled.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Oh really Mariann, and tell me what makes you an expert on finance. In fact, what makes you an expert on anything you say. I’ve read many of your posts and I just shake my head on the ignorant things you say. Actually, I do get a laugh at some of them.
Posted by: ll | October 16, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
ll
If your husbands likes the thought of a Great Depression, then by all means vote for Barack Obama. Taxes are man’s worse enemy because government finds so many ways to expand in its own failures and waste a taxpayer’s hard-earned money. Barack Obama wants to expand government
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
It just came on the news that Brunner from Acorn in Ohio admitted holding two hundred thousand voter registrations that are under fraud investigation. Joe the Plumber was interviewed from Katie Couric and as soon as he said he like McCain’s plan Katie said we are now out of time. That’s because she is pro-obama and wanted to hear him say Obama’s plan was better.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 16, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
We have many Catholics that do not support abortion. It is NOT a question of gay rights or racism. It is the question of Presidential Candidate Barack Hussein Obama supporting abortion. A fetus has the right of life. If you cannot support the right to life, then it is impossible to support any other rights of life. A Catholic whether liberal lay or conservative must come to realize that supporting the right to life is a sacrament of life.
Moreover, liberal lay Catholics must realize that they are not supporting the poor and other races by agreeing to consent to abortion. Abortionists are supporting the control of the poor and the races by allowing abortion. It is necessary to see into the future and come to realize the control of certain peoples because of race and lack of wealth. Abortionists support control of the population and the destruction of a life whether the life be gay, poor, or of a selected race.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Mr. Coffee: God help Joe the plumber if he was a democrat. He wouldn’t be that popular. He is now getting popular like Palin and she should have him at her rally. What a crowd that would create. Katie Couric worked for ABC, then CNN where she got fired, MSNBC ratings went down and now CBS that were poundering if they should let her go. Ratings too low. So her comments are a dead issue.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 16, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
What’s going on here? I’ve heard 3 separate and conflicting things about Joe the plumber, some from Joe himself.
Is Joe’s personal income $250,000 per year?
Are Joe’s business revenues $250,000 per year?
Is Joe trying to buy a business for $250-270,000?
Joe, please get your story straight.
Posted by: Gil Gamesh | October 16, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Two glaring misrepresentations show that the “Joe the plumber” story is bogus. First, it makes the assumption that there’s some magic threshold at $250000, as if an individual would get a refund at $249999 and a big tax bill at 250000. That’s not how it works. Second, Joe said he wanted to buy a business for $250-270000. Nobody’s talking about taxing business purchases. An expense like that would remain a legitimate deduction from income under the Obama tax plan, and would reduce Joe’s taxes.
Posted by: Gil Gamesh | October 16, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Aw, Mariann why the insults and I’ve only made 1 post and you got a laugh at of it. Now that is strange. So since you pretend to know everything you still didn’t tell me how you are an expert in finance. Oh and I guess more than half the country needs to go back to college then, right. Do you know how stupid that sounds.
Posted by: ll | October 16, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
These Rs really kill me. How many had even heard of Acorn over a month ago? Now, because some thrice-married moralizing junkie on the radio tells them to get upset about this organization, right on cue their heads start nodding. Same thing with Palin, who a day after her announcement as VEEP candidate they were canonizing her-yet most had not even heard her name before! How freaking hilarious.
Posted by: Biff | October 16, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Independent Voters: “We have many Catholics that do not support abortion.”
As a Catholic, I’d say that all Catholics do not support abortion.
But… and I had this argument with my pastor… but the pro-life movement is directed toward one thing. That one thing is legally prohibiting abortion by 1) overturning Roe, and 2) then working at the state political level to ban abortions there.
My problem with this is that its a prohibition we tried before – we know its not going to work.
It will only set-up a black market for abortions in states that do ban it, and/or set up a situation in which people who want an abortion drive to the nearest state that allows them.
It doesn’t make pragmatic sense.
People in the pro-life movement will say pragmatism doesn’t apply because we’re talking about morals, etc.
But we’re also talking about how the government governs in connection to those morals, which I’d argue does require pragmatism.
What really irritated my pastor was when I asked him what else can be done to prevent abortions besides getting involved in a debate over legislation?
He had no answer.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Gil Gamesh:
Joe is just part of the story. We want government to SHRINK. Barack Obama wants to grow government bigger than it is. It is time to shrink government to a size where everyone can see what the hell is going on with our tax dollars.
We do not need Barack Obama’s tax incentives. We need Barack Obama to get the hell out of our business.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Gil Gamesh: Joe the plumber wants to buy his own business that will make $250,000 per year. Are you hard of hearing or didn’t you understand what he said. He doesn’t make $250,000 but wants to. If he makes that much income he will pay much higher taxes according to Obama because Obama wants to raise the tax on that amount. His plan could cause a depression in this country and we can’t afford that.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | October 16, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Independent Voters: “We want government to SHRINK.”
Then you should be backing the Libertarian ticket instead of the Republican ticket.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Mariann Pepitone – such bluster. Obama increasing taxes on those who make $250k will cause a depression?
You do realize that someone making $250,001 will only pay the higher tax rate on the $1, right?
Besides, Obama’s approach provides an incentive for small business owners – the few who could take home profits like that – to invest in their own businesses, thus decreasing their taxable profits.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Here’s how McCain could have won me over:
“First I’ll take a wrecking ball to the budget, then a blowtorch, then a sledgehammer, THEN a hatchet and a scalpell, and finally, tweezers. Oh, right, I forget to nuke it first.”
Posted by: rogerthomas | October 16, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Paul:
You are wrong in that liberal lay Catholics do not object to abortion.
Moreover, I never made anyone pregnant unless I wanted it to happen. People need education about life and how to be more than a dog. If a woman prefers back ally abortion, so be it.
If Bach, John Lennon, Elvis Presley, or Einstein would have been aborted, the world would have missed their greatness. Moreover, who to say that the next aborted child would have not been the child that discovered many cures for disease or find a new energy.
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
A repeat for Paul:
WHAT A SHOCKER!
In the final debate of October 15, 2008, Barack Obama talked more like Republicans George Bush and Herbert Hoover. Barack Obama related to growing the federal government, raising taxes and trade restrictions. Barack
Obama says he is not repeating the last eight years of the Bush administration, but talks like President Bush. If Barack Obama becomes president, he says he will repeat the acts of Herbert Hoover (raising taxes and trade restrictions) that led America into the Great Depression. This is Barack Obama’s agenda.
John McCain and Sarah Palin have a much better understanding of how America can survive the financial crisis. John McCain and Sarah Palin do not talk like a George Bush and a Herbert Hoover.
You had better do some real thinking before you pull that lever.
WE HAVE EVERY WORD IN COMPUTER MEMORY!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
From The National Coalition on Health Care:
Healthcare spending is 4.3 times the amount spent on national defense. Total spending was $2.3 TRILLION in 2007. There is a healthcare spending projecting of $4.2 trillion by 2016. Retiring elderly couples will need $200,000 in savings just to pay for the most basic medical coverage. Many experts believe that this figure is conservative and that $300,000 may be a more realistic number. This cost just reflects a growing elderly segment of the population.
From Independent Voters:
The national healthcare program proposed by Barack Obama has inaccuracy in the numbers. We can predict that the national healthcare program will need government funding in huge dollar amounts because there is no control over the true rising costs of doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies.
No one will dictate to the pharmaceutical companies about price because their research costs are astronomical. The American Medical Association will not bow to bullying by any government agency. The hospitals will reduce beds to cover the need to reduce costs of administration. Many hospitals have failed and many are still failing because of costs due to government regulations.
Barack Obama’s national healthcare program is more of a fantasy than a reality. The insurance industry has many failings during this financial crisis and any attempt to reduce premium costs will create a need for subsidies from the federal government. Moreover, the national healthcare program will eventually become mandatory for everyone.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Independent: “Paul – You are wrong in that liberal lay Catholics do not object to abortion.”
You missed the distinction between objecting to abortion and supporting a prohibition of it we know won’t work.
Anyone who is in favor of abortions – I don’t mean in favor of tolerating those who have them, but actually in favor of abortions – isn’t really Catholic, are they?
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Independent: “John McCain and Sarah Palin have a much better understanding of how America can survive the financial crisis.”
Just don’t agree with that one, and it seems neither do a lot of people.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Paul:
You are not Catholic and you cannot understand the difference in Catholic beliefs and the splits that have taken place. I am Catholic and I do understand.
Back Obama wants to grow government and that is not what the country needs during the financial crisis. In reality, John McCain had to go along with the bailout because people would have said, “John McCain does not care”. We have our own think tank of PhD’s in finance and business. Our bean counters know the Barack Obama is going in the wrong direction.
However, we predict with certainty, should Barack Obama win the presidential election, he will have to tell you Democrats that things have changed and some programs will be delayed. If he even tries his programs, they will fail and there will be a Great depression.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Independent: “You are not Catholic and you cannot understand the difference in Catholic beliefs and the splits that have taken place.”
Hate to disappoint you, but I absolutely am Catholic. Go to Mass every Sunday and everything (though I have a bad habit of missing holy days of obligation, and yes, I go to confession when I do). My son is even an altar boy – er, server, as they’re called now.
Independent: “In reality, John McCain had to go along with the bailout because people would have said, ‘John McCain does not care’.”
Wait a minute. You’re acknowledging McCain takes positions for political expediency? What happened to all the country first stuff?
Independent: “should Barack Obama win the presidential election, he will have to tell you Democrats…”
Sorry to disappoint you again, but I’m not and have never been a Democrat.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Also, Independent, I’d counter that its you who doesn’t understand the Catholic Church.
Differences in Catholic beliefs? You’re talking about a religious institution in which doctrine is centrally established. That doctrine leads directly to things like catechisms and the creed we recite every Mass.
The Magesterium sets Catholic beliefs.
Now, I’m not talking about practices, such as whether there should still be altar railings, etc. Those questions aren’t answered in Rome as much as they are left to the local diocesan bishops.
A few practices are determined in Rome, like the vow of celebacy priests in the Roman rite all take. This may surprise you, but eastern rite priests who are alligned with the Vatican as opposed to the Byzantine Church, etc., are allowed to retain their eastern church practices. They can marry, have kids. And they are still fully recognized as priests by the Vatican.
The point I’m getting to is that any Catholic who doesn’t agree with Church teachings about beliefs really aren’t Catholic. They may still attend Church, go to Mass, even take Communion – and in their minds believe they are Catholic – but if they tell a priest all that they will most likely be advised they aren’t truly Catholic. That priest most likely will also ask them to please not take Communion in the future, should they decide to continue attending Mass, which of course they are welcome to do.
As the Church teaches, its not okay to be a “cafeteria Catholic.” If you don’t agree with the Church on a matter of doctrine, you should simply find another denomination with which you do agree.
Posted by: Paul | October 16, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Paul:
There is a time for gathering what you can to try to win the battle. John McCain is military trained and he knows when to regroup. (I am also military trained at Fort Benning, GA., Harmony Church.) John McCain knows the direction to take the country. We Independent Voters have a strong belief in John McCain. Barack Obama hides too much of his true self and we now distrust him until he confesses openly about himself.
I am Roman Catholic and go to mass every Sunday with my family and some of our Independent Voters. I do not believe in abortion and none of the Independent Voters I know believe in abortion. However, that is not to say that no Catholics have abortion. I know of two Catholic women having abortions.
The every-four-year national skirmish among Catholics over abortion politics is as predictable as a politician’s smile. But this year a few “game changers,” in the phrase of the season, have altered the conversation within the Catholic community and for the wider culture.
For the first time since the abortion issue began to dominate the Catholic political discussion 35 years ago, groups have organized and high-profile Catholics have gone public to insist that Catholic teaching does not prohibit a vote for a pro-choice politician.
Keep Out Of My Pocket!
Posted by: Independent Voters | October 16, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
McCain and Palin always need a gimmick. JOE Sixpack, JOE the Plumber, Say it isn’t so JOE! Again with the distractions and still Palin has not faced a real news conference. Are people really falling for this?
Posted by: SA | October 16, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Everyone is on the truth,this was only a debate, what about body language that goes with it? McCain was rather “uptight”, Obama was “relaxed”. When in the white house which man is going to think it through rationally, or go off half cocked? Face to face with another person that the other “dis-likes, disagrees with”, what will happen?
Posted by: T. Jansen | October 16, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Hey Paul, you holding your own against these wingnuts today?
BTW, how’d you like to be flush with cash and all the un-used negative ammunition you ever would need with 3 weeks to go in the campaign???
Obama never had to bring the big guns out last night whatsoever, he just let the angry old fart hang himself.
Posted by: Bob | October 16, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
After last nights pathetic attempt to regain lost ground, Grandpa McCain once again proved he’s a mean tempered, spiteful old man, who has no business running for President.
Effectively he has lost this election, he has no chance of winning, and thank God!
for that.
Like Obama keeps saying ” Yes we can ”
and it looks like yes we will!
Posted by: Larry the cable guy | October 16, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Joe the Plumber Dude, Dud?
Right down to his Spud
Wrench? So what,or who,
lacks flaw? From me to Joe–
Hamlet midst toilets & coil-
ing media–to obvious
plant on my TV?
Posted by: Frank | October 17, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Why I am voting Democrat!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending MY MONEY than I would. I think when you spread the wealth around it is good for everybody! It’s Patriotic!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. All profits are evil and should be confiscated for Government Redistribution.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that MORE Government regulations and higher taxes on Business will stop Business from exporting their jobs to Countries with LESS Government regulations and lower taxes.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe terrorists should be allowed to have trials in American courts. And be able to subpoena top secret documents, soldiers, government officials, etc. to cross examine for their defense. They should have ACLU lawyers who can help intimidate Americans who serve on the juries!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe in a FREE government health care system. I believe doctors, nurses, hospitals, drug companies, etc. will gladly donate their time, products, services, facilities, etc. for FREE and that will be a better system.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe in and support trial lawyers, frivolous lawsuits and outrageous jury verdicts.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe 9/11 was an inside job to con the American people to go to war for oil.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe social security is solvent and that there is a social security lock box and I don’t believe social security is a Ponzi scheme.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe Gay Marriage should be the law of the land and will probably produce better children.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe English should not be the official language of the United States. I don’t mind pushing one for English when I use the phone.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe partial birth abortion is okay but water boarding a terrorist is disgusting.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe having a domestic terrorist like Bill Ayers as a close friend is a good thing. It allows for great relations with foreign terrorists.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe MOST AMERICANS are bitter and cling to their guns and religion. Let’s rid our country of guns and religion!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe illegal aliens deserve all the rights of ordinary Americans plus some additional rights Americans do not have.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe groups like ACORN who register felons, drug addicts, wino’s, homeless drifters, illegal aliens, dead people, children, fictional Disney characters, etc. makes my vote count more.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe celebrating the winter solstice shows compassion for the small minority of people that do not celebrate Christmas.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe hard core criminal murders and rapists deserve life and that the innocent unborn deserve death. It’s a choice I can live with.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe Bush caused Hurricane Katrina and he blew-up the levies in the ninth ward of New Orleans.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe our soldiers are AIR RAIDING villages and killing innocent people.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe sex in the Oval Office with an intern is a private matter and that everybody lies under oath about sex.
I’m votin Demokrat becuse I wus edumkated at a publick sckrool. I lik da NEA!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that any one who is not partaking in one of the many wonderful government programs obviously has too much money and should pay higher taxes.
I’m voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq the terrorists will be happy and now think of us as good people.
I’m voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as it does not offend people. Can’t we all just get along?
I’m voting Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits are wrong. I believe higher taxes on oil companies will produce lower prices at the pump.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe we need to rid ourselves of dependency on foreign oil, BUT I AM AGAINST offshore drilling for oil and natural gas, drilling in Anwar, building nuclear power plants and clean coal technology.
And finally, I’m voting Democrat because I believe Reverend Wright when he said “GODDAMN AMERICA” and “OUR CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST”. Hey let’s make a comfortable nest for those chickens!
Why are you voting Democrat?
Posted by: Average American Mom | October 17, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm