By Arnab Datta

Oct 12, 2008 12:38pm

What’s the Difference Between Ageism and Other Forms of Bias? Depends.

And if you laughed at that cheap adult diaper joke (and really, is incontinence actually amusing?), the odds are you’re not at all put off by any suggestions by opponents of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., that his advanced 72 years mean he’s not up to the job.

But the McCain campaign doesn’t share that bemusement.

And while we’re on the subject of some of the uglier insinuations coming out of the anti-Obama camp these days, it might be worth taking a look at what McCain backers say is nothing less than complete and utter ageism.

"Barack Obama and his very top campaign officials are clearly engaged in a coordinated effort to stoke fears about John McCain’s age," says McCain spox Brian Rogers. "It’s obvious, unfortunate, and offensive."

What are they talking about?

Obama senior adviser Robert Gibbs on MSNBC last month saying, "Just yesterday, John McCain said we shouldn’t fix blame. He took a breath and then fixed blame. He said the fundamentals of our economy are strong, and he flip-flopped. He opposed the bail-out of AIG, and then he supported it. This guy zig-zags. Look, if he’s driving a car, get off the sidewalk."

Or Gibbs on Fox News the month before that, saying of McCain, "somebody’s got to talk about how many houses John McCain has, because he either forgot how many he has, misplaced the keys to those houses, or he just wasn’t being truthful with those reporters."

In May, of course, Obama reacted to McCain’s attack on him as being backed by Hamas, telling CNN, "this is offensive. And I think it’s disappointing, because John McCain always says, well, I’m not going to run that kind of politics. And then to engage in that kind of smear, I think, is unfortunate, particularly since my policy towards Hamas has been no different than his. I have said that they are a terrorist organization, that we should not negotiate with them unless they recognize Israel, renounce violence and unless they’re willing to abide by previous accords between the Palestinians and the Israelis. And, so, for him to toss out comments like that, I think, is an example of him losing his bearings as he pursues this nomination."

This came after the 47-year-old (then just 46) in February saying "I admire John McCain’s half a century of service to this country."

More recently, Obama has hit "the kind of erratic behavior we’ve been seeing out of Senator McCain" in his response to the economic crisis.

"You remember the first day of this crisis, he came out and said, ‘the economy was fundamentally sound,’" Obama said in Dayton, Ohio, this month. "Then two hours later he said we were in a crisis. I don’t think we can afford that kind of erratic and uncertain leadership in these uncertain times. We need steady leadership in the White House. We need a President we can trust in times of crisis."

At a fundraiser in Miami, Florida, last month, Obama said, "John McCain saying just yesterday that he would not meet with the prime minister of Spain!"

Someone in the audience shouted back, "He didn’t know who he was?"

Obama continued, "I thought it was because he was confused or because he bought into this notion that we don’t meet with people that we don’t agree with."

Then, of course, there’s the Obama TV ad with retro fonts and a disco ball, saying: "In 1982, John McCain goes to Washington. Things have changed in the last 26 years, but McCain hasn’t. He admits he still doesn’t know how to use a computer, can’t send an e-mail, still doesn’t understand the economy…"

Another ad, saying McCain has been "erratic in a crisis" (quoting from a newspaper editorial) and "out of touch," features video of McCain in a golf cart with former President George H.W. Bush.

If he’s driving a car, get off the sidewalk. Misplaced the keys to his houses. Losing his bears. A half century of service. Erratic. Uncertain. Confused. First came to Washington in 1982.

You get the picture.

The Obama campaign denies that there’s anything there, I should point out.

Now, for a lot of reasons there are many folks who don’t think ageism can even compare to, say, sexism, racism or xenophobia. All of us pretty much aspire to be old some day. That’s not the same dynamic with gender, race and national origin. And the fears stoked by race may be uglier than the more mocking ones related to age. There’s a difference between racist animus and ageist condescension. Lots of comedians would agree that crowds will laugh at ageist jokes but sexist, racist, and xenophobic ones are just less acceptable.

But here’s the fundamental question: Even if ageism is more acceptable than other forms of bias, does that mean it’s acceptable?

– jpt

User Comments

“get off the sidewalk. Misplaced the keys to his houses. Losing his bears. A half century of service. Erratic. Uncertain. Confused. First came to Washington in 1982.”
Yeah, Those are so much more derogatory than say, “terrorist, un-American and dangerous” being thrown everyday at Obama.

Posted by: JR | October 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Every adult human body, becomes less competent with greatly advancing age.
It IS NOT ageism to recognize that fact and act accordingly.
OLD McCaint would be RETIRED from every large and public enterprises; because of failing capacities due to wear and tear of the body, age!
It’s not ageism to conclude that McCaint is growing in incompetence due to age.
That thinking applies to EVERY older person!
It is not ageism to conclude that the challenges America faces now is too much for a body as olds as McCaint.
Americans should not want a repeat of the OLD-Reagan years, in which UNELECTED special interest parties were setting policies for America.
And if McCaint gets elected, UNELECTED special interests parties will AGAIN be setting American domestic and foreign policies to their own individual benefit.

Posted by: Patriot | October 12, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I guess that depends on if you think that the same old tried politics, are in fact the same old tired politics.
As far as being erratic as being old, I just call it being erratic, without a plan.
Yep McCain is uncertain, and erratic, I see it in teenagers all the time.

Posted by: Thinking | October 12, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Here we go. I see next week is going to be false equivalency week. This is the repeated cycle in the campaign. When McCain acts out, the media feels that it is there duty to try to find equally damning behavior from Obama to appear fair and balanced, Don’t get me wrong, there have been instances were both Obama and McCain were putting out false or misleading ads and were rightfully called out on it, but this is not ageism.
Pointing out that McCain changes his positions depending on which way the wind blows that day can be example of erratic thinking…people at any age can be erratic. While it might not help that he is older, because it could also be related to his age, it is not below the belt. I don’t see the Obama camp crowing that by McCain repeatedly saying that Obama “doesn’t understand” or is “naive” isn’t reverse ageism or racism (i.e. Black men viewed as boys and not men) so they need to cut it out.
Losing your bearings–again, although it could be related to age, it has also been used to describe someone that is losing their moral compass. I would think that by sending out a fundraising email, intimating that your opponent is backed by Hamas, is a clear example of losing your moral compass to win.
Half a century of service? Really? call the wambulance. Personally, I would prefer that Obama not mention McCain’s service at all, but I’m missing how acknowledging the number of years that McCain has served his country, as he does ALL THE TIME, is somehow ageism.
The computer stuff…that’s where I thought they were pushing it. While I think that it is relevant that a leader of this country does not know how to use the technology that is available, and is the key to our future, I didn’t like that ad. They could have made their point in a different way.
The biggest thing that weakens this whole argument, is that McCain himself makes age jokes. Its like Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde with them. They can’t have it both ways. They want to get laughs out of the age jokes, but want to cry foul whenever any talks about something that could insinuate age.

Posted by: TRW | October 12, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Jake,
There is no ‘ism’ here. McCain is old. Obama is inexperienced. Two sides of the same coin. When McCain brings up that inexperience, he himself is contrasting that to his experience and thus, his age.
Perhaps it would be more wise to report on the real question – is McCain (or his campaign) confused and erratic. I think it would be interesting if you spent half as much time documenting McCain’s back-and-forth antics over the past six weeks and the mixed messages from his campaign.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

For all of the Obama supporters and pundits out there calling for increased security on Obama, I think they should also be calling for more security for Senator McCain as well.
Why is it such a possibility that a McCain supporter might cause harm to Obama, but do not consider the possibility that an Obama supporter might want to do the same to McCain?
Once again, the race card is played.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Age can have an unfortunate, but real, effect on a person’s mental abilities.
To assume that John McCain has reduced mental abilities only because of his age would be wrong. But that is not the situation here.
The situation here is that we have evidence of his inability to see the problems this nation faces clearly, and of his inabilitity to make sound judgements in order to deal with these problems.
Take for example, McCain’s not-ready-for-prime-time mortgage bailout plan. He rushed forward with this plan without taking the time to considure two major flaws:
Firstly, it would be impossible to buy back the mortgages that have been mixed together and sliced and diced into now toxic securities.
Second, buying back the mortgages at full price (“face value”) is a huge mistake. The loss that the taxpayer would assume could easily be $100-$700 THOUSAND DOLLARS per bad mortgage. The losses to the taxpayer for ALL of these bad mortgages is likely in the range of 50 TRILLION DOLLARS. Say that again, 50 THOUSAND BILLION DOLLARS.
Meanwhile the writedown to the bankers would be ZERO, out right asking for risky behavior in the future. (The plan would also invite home owners to stop making mortgage payments so as to receive the McCain Bailout.)
This problem is a huge. We need to spend the taxpayer’s money EFFICIENTLY. Buying the tainted securities (and mortgages) at the market price will allow us to rid the economy of these toxic elements.
Throwing away money recklessly, in a plan that apparently was put together minutes before it was presented last Tuesday is IRRESPONSIBLE and evidence of John McCain’s inability to do the job he seeks.
And don’t get me started on what his choice of Sarah Palin says about John McCain’s mental fitness!

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

John McCain is fair game Obama, democrats and the media. They see no harm in attacking John McCain’s age. However, they are very sensitive in reporting the attacks. They wouldn’t want to offend the elderly when they can tell them that John McCain wants to take their social security check away from them.
When McCain points out that Obama’s story on his Ayers connection has gone through 4 evolutions then he is a racist.
When Obama attacks McCain’s adviser Rick Davis and calls him a lobbist, that is likewise okay. However, when McCain responds that Raines stated he Obama had contacted him regarding housing matters John mcCain is a racist. John McCain had no control over Raines cooking the books and bragging about talking with Obama on housing matters.
The double standard is wrong. Giving Obama a pass on hard questions and not calling him on the lies he tells is racist and fueling anger over the double standard being applied in the media.

Posted by: ubu1991 | October 12, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

By the way, Jake, I don’t see folks at Obama’s events saying “kill him” or “terrorist” in regard to McCain.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

A couple things to remember:
1) Most of these attacks are tied in to _Actual_ erratic behavior. Saying the economy is strong and then 2 hours saying it’s in a crisis _is_ erratic. Calling for someone to be fired who can’t be fired, in the midst of a systemic crisis, is erratic. Making a policy of refusing to meet with the leader of Spain because you misunderstood a question and want to save face, that’s erratic and unsteady leadership. These may relate to age, but they are all fair attacks. Insinuating that Obama is plotting with terrorists is not equivalent.
2) Age is a fair issue. Being really old can affect your decision-making. Now, you couldn’t say, “don’t vote for mccain because he’s old.” But if you question a 70-year-old’s decision-making, age will be brought up, if nothing else by the press.
3) Finally, tying bad decision-making to age and making a campaign issue out of that isn’t stoking extremist, violent anger on one side or the other. Unlike the Republican tactic of associating Obama with domestic terrorists, Arab culture, and radical preachers, bringing up age isn’t exploiting violent and unfair prejudices to make voters afraid of “the other,” like the GOP’s attacks are.
Is that enough differences for you? Please, hop off the tire swing and stop trying to find false equivalencies in these two campaigns.

Posted by: Tim M | October 12, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

I support Obama!
But have to say the only age restriction placed on it is by your constution which says they have to be over 35 years old!
That said your retirement age is 65!
To Sill be fit for Miltary service you cant be older than 49
When you pick someone so inept as McCain has with Palin I guess its fair to remind people of his age!
In America age discrimination is inshrined in you Constition and your government agencies!
You resrict veiw of shows by age all contrys set limits on when someone is an adult!
Raceisim isnt the same as its making judgement soley on apperance and nothing more!

Posted by: Aussie | October 12, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Got news for you neo-cons, John McCain IS old, no one is making that up unlike the lying attacks on Obama that call him a terrorist, Muslim and un-American.
I’ll repeat that for the repubs among us, John McCain REALLY IS old.

Posted by: JR | October 12, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Rest assured, the MSM would fail to report on such goings on at Obama events, much like they fail to report on most negatives concerning Obama.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

It’s ridiculous to compare “ageism” to sexism and racism. Who doesn’t know an older person whose faculties and endurance have declined? It’s a legitimate concern, and everyone knows it.

Posted by: Sean Morgan | October 12, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

So does that mean we can blame AGE on all of Obama’s continuously changing stories regarding his relationships with Ayers and ACORN?
And, what would the explanation be for these inconsistent, contradictory statements on the same subject if not age????

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Nope, ageism is not okay. McCain is clearly as qualified as Obama…more with his experience.

Posted by: Wade | October 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

JR,
You make a good case for McCain. He is indeed an elder statesman. Obama is still cutting his teeth. There’s a lot of hate in this country towards our elders. Don’t forget, though, the elders vote in greater numbers than the youth. In the end you might just get passed by.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 12, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Yes, Jake does occasionally put a post on here that could be deemed “negative” for Obama.
I’m sure if we took a tally over the last three months, the negatives for McCain/Palin would probably outnumber the Obama/Biden negatives 2 or 3 to one.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

At this point who cares about ageism or sexism or any other ism. McCain has a bunch of really fanatical religous nuts running his rallies. A pastor that professes to know what God wants. Saying God would be unhappy with Obama…what the h*$$? McCain’s whole campaign has moved past scary. I think it’s obvious Palin has brought out the worst. How any spiritual person could condone and support such hate is beyond me. I know I didn’t learn that crap in Sunday school.Country first my hinnie…Their agenda first. Talk about too much government. Next thing you know they’ll be controlling who and how we worship.We’ll lose all personal freedoms. Then we’ll see exactly how it is to live in the middle east.

Posted by: Lauri | October 12, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Since the trooper gate and AIP stories are done, after a super brief spot in the headlines… this is where the stories are heading.
You spent over a week talking about Ayers, and only 1 day talking about trooper gate…
Now Jake, do you think that is fair?
Just something else to attach Obama on… but the bright side of this, is that hopefully it wont be brought up again tommorrow.

Posted by: lmg | October 12, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Quite frankly, it never crosssed my mind that any of the Obama campaign comments were referencing his age. So I, honestly, don’t understand where they’re coming from on this one.
I only think of his age in relation to the proximity of Palin to the office and that has nothing to do with campaign rhetoric.
Considering the fact that I’m raising two teenagers, I see no difference in the ability of teenagers to be erratic than in McCain’s ability to do so.
This has always been my definition of erratic:
liable to sudden unpredictable change; “erratic behavior”; “fickle weather”; “mercurial twists of temperament”; “a quicksilver character, cool and willful at one moment, utterly fragile the next” (Dictionary.com says it better than I could)
When I think of McCain and erratic, that’s how I think of it. Age has nothing to do with it.
As far as the other comments (forgetting # of houses, etc.) I NEVER put them together with age. I am truly baffled where this ageism comes from.

Posted by: This is SO Old | October 12, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Lee,
Maybe if the economy wasn’t in the crapper, people would care about those things. However, on the fundamental issue this year – the economy – McCain has been all over the board. Blame Obama all you want, but McCain is doing it to himself. What were his ideas again:
1. ‘Fundamentals are strong’
2. ‘We need a commission’
3. ‘I’m suspending my campaign’
4. ‘I’m for the bailout’
5. ‘This bailout is Obama’s fault’
6. ‘Let’s have the government buy everyone’s mortgage’
7. ‘Everybody knows me. I’ve got the answer. I’ve got the solution.’
Need I go on? I’m not saying Obama doesn’t have his own problems – I’m just saying that McCain has been the source of most of his.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Just as Obama and his lies and poor judgment have been the source of his.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

You’re reading way too much into this, Jake. Are you accusing the GOP leadership of ageism?
“Republican leaders said Saturday that they were worried Mr. McCain was heading for defeat unless he brought stability to his presidential candidacy”
Now, Mr. McCain is 72 and suffers from some serious health problems. It is a concern of many people that he wont be able to serve out a first term because of that. It is not a concern that people would have about someone because they are black, or a woman.
Mr. McCain has decided not to let people poke around his medical records, as is his right. The health question though is (hopefully) seperate from the stability one, that even the GOP is concerned about.

Posted by: Mike | October 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

The reality for all of us is that we age and die. And as we age, the likelihood increases of falling victim to dementia, cancer, and other illnesses.
John McCain — or any man or woman of his age — is more likely to fall seriously ill or die in office than Barack Obama — or any man or woman of his age. That’s reality.
As someone who once respected John McCain, I find it unpleasant but not unreasonable to wonder whether McCain’s erratic behavior and apparent weariness are signs that he lacks the vigor required for the job.
If McCain’s people are so concerned about about age-related jokes at McCain’s expense, they should realize that a campaign — theirs or Obama’s — can’t control comedians.
And if they’re so offended, maybe they should have thought twice before making remarks about Obama that provoke racist and xenophobic responses from the mob.

Posted by: Alex | October 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Since I don’t personally fall into the age 60 and over category, I rely on others’ experiences.
Doris Roberts, the Emmy-award winning actress in her seventies from “Everybody Loves Raymond” (playing Marie Barone) said
“My peers and I are portrayed as dependent, helpless, unproductive and demanding rather than deserving,” Roberts testified. “In reality, the majority of seniors are self-sufficient, middle-class consumers with more assets than most young people, and the time and talent to offer society.”
An African-American man I know told me that racism he experienced from earliest memory to the present can’t hold a candle to the treatment sent his way once he turned gray and walked with bent shoulders. If he didn’t become altogether invisible, then it was inept and incapable. He was catalyst invoking either pity or derision. The thing he said that made me think hardest was that when people hate you for your race, they know they themselves are not going to ever be that race they’re making fun of. When they poke at you for being old, they hate you for what they themselves are going to become in the future if they don’t die first, so it scares them and the fear makes them hate even harder.
It made all the sense in the world to me.

Posted by: Tracy Lynn | October 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Why try to hide the OBVIOUS.
Obama is Socialist with radical mentors Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis
Obama is a community organizer (agitator) as the basis of his ideology.
Income Redistribution
Economic Injustice
Fair Wealths (no one can have MORE than the others)
Welcome to United States Socialist of America (USSA).
I’d be damn to let this happens.
I’ll defend it with my vote.
For those blind and moron Obama supporters need to wake up and see the reality.

Posted by: Voter In America | October 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Lee,
I did just what you suggested. As I went through, to my surprise, the negative Obama articles were balanced with negative McCain articles and most could be considered as neutral.
Some may perceive this as Mr. Tapper being fair to both sides… The media likes to think that if both sides attack it then it must be doing something correctly. I’m not sure I agree, it may just mean that both sides are right.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Hey Jake,
If you look into Jerome Corsi’s Kenyan deportment “episode” – you will find documents that “counsel” the Odinga campaign (Obama’s cousin- into who government he meddled illegally).
One of the many “pointers” included pointing out his opponent’s AGE.
Others were: appeal to the youth vote, take over the media, viral e-mails, blogging and internet.
(There’s LOTS more)
And- the “if you lose” clause (and he did and THEY did)
Cause friction between the tribes.
Promote classism.
Incite RIOTS.
After Odinga lost in Dec. 2007, there was mass violence: rape, murder and the burning of over 800 Christian churches in this attempt at creating a Muslim State.
Does any of this sound familiar and sickly distressing to you???

Posted by: Alec | October 12, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

the bottom line is that for the last 8 years the repugs/neo-cons have ruined America…. that’s why McCain & Palin will lose in a historic election.
Republicans have finally come out of the shadows and now the whole world can see their hate and fear at their political rallies.

Posted by: Blue | October 12, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Personally, I would like to see more of Obama’s medical records than the one-page report his physician provided some months ago.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Actions speak louder than words.
McCain has indeed been erratic. He has shown poor judgement. He campaign team appears out of control.
I don’t really care what the reasons are for these things, I’m just not interested in voting for the results.
(Although as an older person I would prefer McCain’s problems be blamed on something he can’t control, as opposed to McCain doing these things on purpose.)

Posted by: Tom J | October 12, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

lee,
can you make up more to bolster you argument
deception and lies got us the the last 8 years and as we see
the same morons are trying to spin the same type of arguments now
ugh.
same team
same tactics
same logic
9th year.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I’d like to see more of both Obama’s and McCain’s health records.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

There is a major difference between ageism and realism
Obama often does 3 campaign events, including the weekends. Yesterday he did 4 by 5pm
Until lately McCain did not do weekends and rarely more than 1 campaign event per day
I do not thing McCain’s age is affecting voters very much.
The Evangelical voters that keep electing Republicans that lie about making abortion illegal, but never make any effort after being elecected are major backers of McCain
We have seen in videos this week example of other voters that back McCain. People that are racists or fall for the Republican fear fueling.
Another group are the wealthy that have the most to gain from a McCain Presidency.

Posted by: Jim | October 12, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Obama has been just as “erratic” during this campaign as McCain.
First, he would take public financing, then he won’t.
Second, he was against FISA, then he voted for it.
Third, he was against off-shore drilling, then he was for it.
57 States.
My Muslim Faith.
How can anyone possibly bring McCain’s inconsistent statements into play when Obama makes just as many, if not more?
The question I asked previously is if Obama’s inconsistencies cannot be blamed on age, what is the answer?
Personally, I would rather be led by a Senior Citizen than an outright liar.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

To MIguy,
Only McCain showed his health records and Birth Certificate.
Still Waiting for Obama’s
See what’s in it?
Also, provide a birth certifcate (real/original) not the fake one on the web site.

Posted by: Voter In America | October 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

What about Brain Lame ism or
Or as in Lame Brain McCain
Be Better off having Bush 8 more years
than McCain for 4 years….
But Obama seems like a nice man
and does not go off on a wild tangent
as Mad Dog McCain…. 50 make it 100
years
McCain has more Nick Names than anyone
in Government ………..

Posted by: Anita Yova | October 12, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Bush:
ONLY 100 Days More In Office (the world anxiously awaits the departure of this criminal)
GOP Leaders Worried McCain Headed For Defeat
“Our Message Isn’t Connecting” … Confusion And Turmoil In Campaign
Troopergate Report Shows Palin Administration “Shockingly Amateurish”
Rollins: Obama Headed For Landslide Win

Posted by: Blue | October 12, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

to the morons arguing about obama’s “missing medical history”
he is 47 years old!…and hasn’t had medical issues.
duh..
how dumb do you have to be to realize…HE DOESN”T HAVE tons and tons of medical records.
Gahd how stupid do people have to be
John mccain has had LOTS of medical problems
and HE IS 72 YEARS OLD!
that is why his medical history is that long…
that is what happens when you get to 72 and have had cancer 4 times and had physical impairments
ugh.
Obama is like a lot of 47 year olds…
actually not even…
he is healthier than most 47 year olds…
so guess what
they don’t keep extensive records when you don’t have enything wrong…
duh.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Lee,
Thanks for the lack of specifics.
As one measure of John McCain’s erratic not-ready-for-prime-time behavior, you might want to consider this fact:
Virtually every economist that McCain listed as ‘economists for McCain’ have condemned his idea, apparently put together minutes before it was announced, to buy bad mortgages at FULL VALUE (“face value”).
Just google “Economists For McCain Trash McCain’s New Mortgage Plan”
JUST AS HIS GAS TAX PANDER WAS CONDEMNED by virtually every economist is the nation.
IF YOU WANT erratic leadership, then you should vote for McCain!

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

To dl,
Can you provide the evidence for your statements?
Ranting illogically does not impress anyone.

Posted by: Voter In America | October 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Well, let’s see. John McCain insinuates Obama is a terrorist. Palin refers to Obama in the same manner. McCain’s campaign stirs the crowd into a hate-filled fear inducing frenzy. Someone calling out kill him. Obama accuses McCain of losing his faculties. Somehow Obama’s rhetoric doesn’t seem to be so bad. And McCain is old. For those among us that have passed the 50 mark, know what it’s like to search for your car keys for an hour only to find them in your pocket. Not much of a stretch of the imagination, really.

Posted by: Bea | October 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

the below arguments about Obama’s health records and birth certificate show just how smart the morons arguing for mccain are.
Healthy 47 year olds don’t have long medical histories idiots.
They keep long histories when something is wrong…

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

More economists than then ones you mention regarding McCain are panning Obama’s economic and tax plans, including Nobel Prize winning economists.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“Barak Obama is serving only his second term in the Illinois State Senate so he might be fairly charged with ambition, but the same might have be said of Bobby Rush when he ran against Congressman Charles Hayes. Obama also has put in time at the grass roots, working for five years as a community organizer in Harlem and in Chicago. When Obama participated in a 1996 UofC YDS Townhall Meeting on Economic Insecurity, much of what he had to say was well within the mainstream of European social democracy. To volunteer, call 773 846 2262. Contributions may be sent to Obama for Congress 2000, PO Box 497987, Chicago, IL 60649.”
There you have it. Obama the European Socialist.

Posted by: geevill | October 12, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

yelling “old” is a lot different than yelling “terrorist” or “kill him”

Posted by: Gus | October 12, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Voter in America pretty much typifies the thinking that got the Republican Party into the mess that they are now in. They thought that they could cobble together a majority of voters who think that Obama is “not like us” and that there is no way Obama could get around that without cheating.
Turns out that America is not as racist as you think, or is just more concerned about the economy and wants to give the liberal black guy a chance because he represents something different.
But the Republicans can’t stand the thought of ordinary Americans having hope for a better future. Blacks, poor people, women – according to the Republican credo, these people are not supposed to have hope. The entire Republican strategy has been based on making people think that there is no hope through the electoral system.
Thats why they are freaking out about the number of people registering to vote this year (although they tend to freak out about the same thing every two years and depend on people forgetting that nothing ever comes of these investigations of registration problems).

Posted by: Mike | October 12, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

“If you weren’t already convinced that John McCain’s team had no idea what they were doing when they chose Sarah Palin as his running mate, you will be after reading this story.
Meet Sarah Palin’s best Alaska pals:
Though Chryson belongs to a fringe political party, one that advocates the secession of Alaska from the Union, and that organizes with other like-minded secessionist movements from Canada to the Deep South, he is not without peculiar influence in state politics, especially the rise of Sarah Palin. An obscure figure outside of Alaska, Chryson has been a political fixture in the hometown of the Republican vice-presidential nominee for over a decade. During the 1990s, when Chryson directed the AIP, he and another radical right-winger, Steve Stoll, played a quiet but pivotal role in electing Palin as mayor of Wasilla and shaping her political agenda afterward. Both Stoll and Chryson not only contributed to Palin’s campaign financially, they played major behind-the-scenes roles in the Palin camp before, during and after her victory.
Palin backed Chryson as he successfully advanced a host of anti-tax, pro-gun initiatives, including one that altered the state Constitution’s language to better facilitate the formation of anti-government militias. She joined in their vendetta against several local officials they disliked, and listened to their advice about hiring. She attempted to name Stoll, a John Birch Society activist known in the Mat-Su Valley as “Black Helicopter Steve,” to an empty Wasilla City Council seat. “Every time I showed up her door was open,” said Chryson. “And that policy continued when she became governor.”
So let’s get this straight. John McCain’s team chose someone whose political career was tightly interwoven with – and supported by – extremists. Not just average wingnuts. Extremists. Radicals. A secessionist and a paranoid militia organizer.”

Posted by: Blue | October 12, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

1. Unlike race and gender, advancing age is a characteristic that really does correlate with declines in cognitive ability.
2. Objective consideration of the facts about McCain’s behavior and positions advanced during the campaign justifies a judgement of his being erratic. Is it age based? That is one possible explanation, perhaps less pejorative than that he is an opportunist or just plain stupid.
3. America has recently had a dementia sufferer as president in the person of Reagan in his second term. It is justifiable to look at this history and be concerned.
4. Concerns about McCain’s health and consequently his ability to serve out the term he is running for is made much more salient by the presence of Palin as his running mate, since she is patently unqualified to step into the role of president.
No false equivalences please.

Posted by: bemused | October 12, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Republicans,
Is it fair to say that Sarah Palin ‘paled around with terrorists’ when she gave supportive speaches to the Alaska Independence Party?
The founder of this group Joe “I’m an Alaskan, not an American” Vogler was murdered in 1993 during an illegal sale of plastic explosives that went bad.
Who was Vogler planning to bomb with these plastic explosives?

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

This is absurd! How can anyone with any common sense compare ageism to racism? Perhaps I’m missing something, but I’ve yet to read of a person being lynched by a mob simply because of they’re a senior citizen!

Posted by: jiminy | October 12, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

McCain released one page of his health records. Obama released one page of his health records. Just because you’re young dosen’t mean you can’t have health issues. But, I’m sure if Obama had had any major health crisis,say, like melanoma, someone would surely know about it.

Posted by: Lauri | October 12, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Do you all have any idea how the type of cancer John mcCain has had…gets exponentially more likely to reoccur the more times you have it?
do you all understand science.
go look at how the risks go up exponentially the more times you are diagnosed
and the older you are.
stupid is as stupid does.
you do not hire someone whose removal from office for whatever reason would shake up both the world economy and weaken our security…
and whose moron of a sidekick back up would be devastating to the world.
age is directly linked to your odds of dimentia and forgetfulness
there is no way of getting around that
and if you were to look at a candidate who had those traits…
they would have to overwhelmingly show that the other candidate would be mush worse…and that their backup VP was as good as they are.
this is a joke.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“The Alaskan Independence Party has got links to almost every independence-minded movement in the world,” Chryson exclaimed. “And Alaska is not the only place that’s about separation. There’s at least 30 different states that are talking about some type of separation from the United States.”
This has meant rubbing shoulders and forging alliances with outright white supremacists and far-right theocrats, particularly those who dominate the proceedings at such gatherings as the North American Secessionist conventions, which AIP delegates have attended in recent years.

Posted by: Blue | October 12, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

VIA: Obama has supplied the documents. I am not satisfied with the medical records released by either campaign. However, with that said, somehow Cheney has survived these past 8 years…
Lee: You bring up some valid Obama wishy-washiness. Both candidates are flawed. Choose whom you prefer. I personally am against the candidates taking public financing. As for FISA and off-shore drilling, one could argue that it bodes well for an Obama presidency that he can compromise with Republicans to pass legislation – even when it goes against the wishes of his “base”.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

To Jake Tapper,
You forgot Gibbs saying McCain was yelling get off my lawn. He said this before the last debate.
But this country has a doubled standard. Obama can say anything and everyone else better salute and respect him.

Posted by: Jeff | October 12, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

‘Blaming a possible Democratic victory on “voter fraud” is much easier than acknowledging that a resounding Democratic victory would be a wholesale rejection of Republican governance..
So let them wrap themselves in tin foil. Let them revel in nuttery now. They can use that tin foil to wipe their eyes if and when–as the polls suggest–they will be wallowing in defeat in November.’

Posted by: Blue | October 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

and lets be clear
the people with the biggest issues with his age not his policies…
are the people that ARE his age.
they may not like obama for his policies
but if they have hesitation about mcCain
it is because they know what it is like to be that age
and most of them will be the majority of people who say that is the factor that concerns them.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Erratic, uncertain, confused, and losing his bearings are all easily justified comments about McCain and his campaign. If he loses, he may even admit some of these things himself, if he’s honest.
“Get off the sidewalk” and “lost the keys” are a bit crude.
But the Cressbeckler video was a 10 out of 10!

Posted by: Danny | October 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Well Jake, we certainly watched while the OBama campaign aided by the media went on an all out assult on Hillary Clinton, a lot of which was downright sexist. It’s not okay to question a black person’s positions, associations or past when he’s running for office, but you can say whatever you want to about a white woman. Women are still second class citizens in this country. Look at what’s been said about Sarah Palin, now I am no supporter of her politics, but did she deserve some of the attacks? And were they attacks that a man would have contended with?
We’ve created a politically correct world run amok where a black politican (as long as he’s male) cannot be questioned at all or it’s racist.. and a white woman can be called the B word on national TV and no one says “boo”. And it also appears, if you are an old white man, you can also be the target of mean spirited nonsense based on your age. Can you IMAGINE the outrage if anyone made an outright statement about BO that could be construed as racist? The liberals would go crazy. But those same people never stood up for Hillary, and apparently it’s okay to insult an older person as long as he’s a republican.
Go Figure

Posted by: The World has gone Crazy | October 12, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Lee,
You can’t make the McCain problem go away by sticky your head in the sand.
HIS ECONOMISTS, the one’s HE LISTED, say the man has loose marbles in his head when it comes to his FACE VALUE mortage bailout.
If you don’t have loose marbles in your head, you might want to admit McCain’s irresponsible proposals and erratic behavior.

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

and also lets be clear
it is not just about racism
these Palin “terrorist” comments.
It is about pouring gasoline on ignorant matches.
It is Palin saying Obama may be evil.
whether that is racist or not…whatever…
if it absolutely irresponsible and revolting for America to see a person running to be in the white house …trying to strengthen their case by encouraging the mindsets of the values and anger that Timothy McVeigh and Joe Vogel had…
that is the ultimate in anti-Americanism
parading as something American.
throw this moron back to Alaska.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Republicans,
Is it fair to say that John McCain ‘paled around with terrorists’ when he appeared, again and again, on the G. Gordon Liddy program?
Besides breaking into the Watergate hotel and Danial Elsberg’s doctor’s office, Liddy has given instructions ON THE AIR on how to murder federal agents.

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Subprime lending was at its height vrom 2004 to 2006.
Federal Reserve Board data show that:
_ More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions. [NOT FANNIE and FREDDIE]
_ Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.
_ Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that’s being lambasted by conservative critics.
The “turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007,” the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets reported Friday.

Posted by: McHooverville | October 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

It is not about age – McCain succumbed to the forces of fear – Obama remained faithful to the forces of hope and optimism. ……………..

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | October 12, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Jimmy, nothing can be compared to lynching. I think they are just trying to make a comparison to some of the reasons people are treated unfairly. Both are bad in respect to being fired 5 years before you can collect your full pension, therefore the employer dosen’t have to continue your benefits, not being hired, how much money you make,not being hired, etc. Though both scenerios are disturbing, I don’t think the two issues can really be looked at the same. But, there’s no mistaking someone in their 70′s, no matter how spry, will show some signs of aging.I remember them trying to cover for Reagan when he started showing signs of Alzheimers during his last term.I’m only 49 and I have to constantly reprogram myself to keep up with technology alone. If anything just being out of touch is reason enough for me not to vote for him.

Posted by: Syd | October 12, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Agism per se is wrong, because even though age often causes cognitive problems, it does not always. So, like any other kind of “profiling,” discriminating against all old people just to make sure that you catch the minority of feebla ones is not fair.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 12, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

jock59801
so would you like a 93 year old to perform open heart surgery on your mother or father?
or yourself?
age can be a legitimate factor
especially when the individual you are talking about has had cancer 4 TIMES!

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Obama is the only candidate in my lifetime whose campaign appears to be totally based in the future, and little or nothing in the past.
He constantly flaunts how he could have had a high-priced job on Wall Street and instead went to Chicago to be a “community organizer.”
That is about all he speaks about regarding his record.
I think the American people needed to hear from him regarding his “work” as a community organizer. What exactly did he do on the Woods Foundation, on Project Vote, on the Annengerg Challenge?
Even his record as a State Senator has not been very forthcoming. He has never spoken much about it. Obama should have provided his own account of his activities during this time and he never did.
The American people should not have to go online and conduct their own research regarding someone who wants to be President.
A presidential candidate is not a college term paper assignment.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

dl:
I believe Dr. DeBakey was performing successful open heart surgeries well into his 90′s.
Your point is not well taken.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

you all with this domestic terrorism garbage
I guess Republican definition of domestic terror doesn’t include people like Timothy McVeigh and Joe Vogle…
two men whose values and beliefs were on display clearly at the Palin rallies.
Domestic terrorism in America 3 out of 4 times comes from that mindset we saw.
so stop,
let us talk about the economy while you all explain why Todd Palin joined Joe Vogel’s group the year they were mourning his death (attempting to buy bomb making materials for such domestic terrorism for the values of said party)
and they were writing the constituion for the Nation of Alaska…
the palin’s were so inspired by that 94 convention he joined for a decade almost and she ended up attended a few more times eventually being their keynote speaker…
ugh
and if you look at her rallies last week and what she was saying
that is why it was important to know before Mccain picked her.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Thanks for bringing this up Jake but we get the picture on Obama smear tactics which are smarmey and often barely recognizable. And I for one don’t like any of the mud slinging about Ayers from McCain. Ayers, although despicable, is more like a keystone cop rather than a successful terrorist and had the man not been from a wealthy family he would been a nice wife for many lonely men in prison. McCain should have simply made a point of how Obama and Ayers took the Annenberg donation that was suppose to help education and squandered it.
All or us or at least most of us know we are known by the company we keep, we don’t need McCain telling who is or is not a scoundrel.

Posted by: david | October 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

If for no other reason, McCain’s age becomes a topic of concern because of his pick for VP. Can any of you imagine an anti-environmental evangelical extremist like Palin as president?

Posted by: JR | October 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Sources close to McCain are confirming what most commedians have been joking about for a long time, that joke McCain at 72years old suffers from incotinence, urinary incontinency, contrary to popular believe that he has been wearing an adult diaper, he hasn’t been, Senator McCain has been wearing a leg strap catheter that he empties every few hours. His staff and doctor opposed to the idea that the media will be able to pickup on the adult diaper idea.
What else are not being told about McCain’s medical history?

Posted by: Jari | October 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

It is not “bias” to insist that an elderly candidate to get tested for INCIPIENT ALZHEIMER’s, since one out of seven persons his age actually have it.
Notice that the McCain campaign hits back hard if you even use an expression that might be about age.
Age is not like sex or sexual preference.
Age includes functionality.
Reagan failed to be able to give testimony on the treason of Bush I and Iran Contra because Reagan was able to say ” I dont remember”. That’s age and its not about discrimination, like being against a person of color because some other persons of color steal. “I dont remember” means, I am not competent to deal with reality. When your grandmother or grandfather goes into the next room and they dont remember why, that’s a negative about age, not discrimination.
There should be poll in which persons over 65 are asked questions about recall. How often they forget some little thing, how often they cannot remember important things.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Lee
so you can name 1 heart surgeon from his 90′s who can perform heart surgery…
ugh.
would you like another 93 year old performing heart surgery on you?
spin all you want but age of course should be a factor…
and anyone who says otherwise is being disengenuous.
so should someone who has a mental challenge by subject to analysis of their mental capabilities when voting…
because they can be good judges on occasion?
this is stupid
same team
same tactics
same logic
9th year.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Have you seen Jake’s most recent post regarding the guys with the molotov cocktail in Oregon trying to destroy a McCain campaign sign?

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

The biggest effect age has is about learning new things. New learnings are imperative to lead the US.
McCain cannot use a computer, although audio controllers exist for computers. It is not about his arms. It is about his brain. He can afford to buy audio controller software. New learnings and the ability to engineer our society are beyond John McCain.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Age bias, _in general_ is not OK, especially in terms of employment.
But it is in this case for this simple reason: the line of succession.
His potential successor is not competent to do the job of President, and given the stories about how her spouse “shares” the governorship of Alaska, neither is he.
That’s the bottom line for me.

Posted by: Majus | October 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Lee,
DeBakey was NOT performing surguries in his 90′s! Get your facts right!
FACTS are stubborn things.
For example, right from factcheck.org, you can see that 1) McCain’s tax plans offer little or no help to the middle class (big surprise, I am sure!) and 2) McCain nevertheless increases the federal deficit MORE than Obama:
We spoke with Len Berman, director of the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, which has produced one of the most authoritative analyses of the two candidates’ tax plans. When we asked him if Obama’s claim that he would “cut taxes for 95 percent of all working families” was true, Berman told FactCheck.org that it was “consistent with our estimates.” Overall, the TPC found that Obama’s plan would produce a tax cut for 81.3 percent of all households, and a cut for 95.5 percent of all households with children.
Under Obama’s plan, the TPC estimates that people (or couples) making between $37,595 and $66,354 a year would see an average savings of $1,118 on their taxes.
Under McCain’s plan, on the other hand, those same individuals would save $325 on average — $793 less than the average savings under Obama’s plan.”
JOHN MCCAIN IS WONDERING AROUND, clueless, just as he literally wondered around the stage during the last debate!

Posted by: John McCain's conscience | October 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

dl:
My point was there are EXCEPTIONS to every rule.
You cannot generalize and say that because someone is in their 70′s, they cannot be President.
Just like a doctor in his 90′s is incapable of still performing surgery.

Posted by: Lee | October 12, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

There are a lot of claims of different isms being thrown out there in the political world today. I hear that obama and the media is using sexism about Palin but nobody who says this gives examples of sexism. I hear racism from the media and there are some examples. I here ageism being used against McCain but if a younger person was to say these same thing wouldn’t it raise the same questions

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

There is a clear bias. And it’s not just ageism, but sexism toward HIllary, and now Palin.
Yet, anything negative, ANYTHING, against Obama, is called racist. This is how Obama will try to steal the election, by raising the race card on everything. This is going on now, with the ridiculous comments of Rep Lewis and all the Obama supporters. Our we not allowed to vet and criticize political candidates? There is a cry for racism for everything, and not only is it ridiculous, it is truly sickening.
it also diminishes the significance of true issues of racism, which is sad.
Just yesterday, I saw cries of racism over Palin wearing a white jacket at a rally. So, has it come to this, it is now RACIST to wear a white jacket?
THIS is the America that Obama has brought us. Whoever thinks that Obama is not dividing the country, is living in a “fairy tale”. (oops, was that racist too?).
There is no doubt: Obama will DESTROY America. The question is, how much to you love our great country to do what you can to protec it?

Posted by: liberati | October 12, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

comparing “ageism” with the racism happening in this campaign is ridiculous.
even if obama were to make explicit references to mccain problems associated with his age, why would that be problematic or wrong?
if someone is physically infirm, they can be prevented from performing all sorts of activities in this country.
is it ageism to prevent someone who is incapacitated because of age to not have a driver’s license?
if they cannot pass the licensing test because they cannot see anymore, or because they are physically debilitated, are we supposed to ignore those problems?
why is it wrong to point out that mccain has had several incidents where he does appear to be suffering because of age issues?
racial prejudice involves assigning general characteristics to a specific individual simply because he/she is a member of a particular group.
however, if you point to specific acts and omissions by a person and argue that those acts indicate a particular problem or trait, there is nothing prejudicial about that, and if you draw certain conclusions and act on them, there is nothing discriminatory about that either.
this is more mccain spin designed to prevent legitimate scrutiny of his very real problems related to age.

Posted by: frankie d | October 12, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Obama is evil. McCain ain’t much, but at least he is American !

Posted by: Independent | October 12, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

and Lee
lets be very clear on the Annenberg foundation
leaders from Reagan and other republican administrations chose to give this
“unrepentant domestic terrorist”
50 MILLION dollars…and the entire city of Chicago (the third largest city in the US) chose to name him Citizen of the Year.
unlike Joe Vogel or Timothy mcVeigh or Mccain’s buddy Liddy…all of wehom are regarded horrifically for their beliefs and actions…
all of whom were and are unrepentant in the true sense of the word.
2 of whom are linked to mccain palin more directly than Ayers ever thought of being with Obama.
this election is a joke
people are ebing spun like they were the last time
luckily most Americans got smarter.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

panning Obama’s economic and tax plans, including Nobel Prize winning economists.
You are kidding. You mean Republican, conservative economists have something bad to say about Obama?
Wow! That’s news.
Now let’s talk socialism here.
You have socialism for the rich: You have McCain giving my $300 billion to the bankers in his new housing bailout.
You have socialism where “I am my brother’s keeper” Christians acting like Christians,
where we start taking care of the young and the elderly by re-inventing the health care system to be more inclusive.
Its either take care of the young and the elderly or follow Palin’s path to war with Russia.
Same amount of money. Nuclear war and the universal draft, or universal health care.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

THE PROBLEM WITH THE CURRENT ELECTIONS
BEGUN WITH THE PRIMARIES……..
OUR SYSTEM FOR NOMINATING A PARTY
LEADER WITH THE PRIMARIES,CAUCUSES
MUST CHANGE FOR THE NEXT ELECTIONS…
WE MUST ALLOW ONE DAY FOR BOTH PARTIES
TO VOTE FOR A CANDIDATE JUST LIKE
WE DO ON GENERAL ELECTIONS……
WE MUST STOP THE PROLONG PRIMARIES AND
CAUCUSES TO GO ON AND ON FOR MONTHS AND
STATE BY STATE,BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW THE
MANIPULATION OF THE SYSTEM BY THE
CANDIDATES,JUST LIKE OBAMA DID……
WE END UP WITH OBAMA WHICH OVER 40%
OF WHITES DON’T LIKE HIM AND WITH
McCAIN AND OLD MAN 72 YEARS……
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS SYSTEM NOW..
BY REFORMING THE PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES
TO ONE DAY ELECTIONS…….

Posted by: Nicholas | October 12, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Is McCain sticking to his story where we are supposed to vote for him because he is going to put 1/4 of our social security into the stock market?

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Obama has promised to bring us all together…yet, he has already caused more division and hatred than any candidate in history. The great uniter will actually be the great divider. I can tell you for sure…even if he is elected he will never be President to me! I will never respect him or that hateful Michelle!

Posted by: Independent | October 12, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Lee
I never said that because someone is in their 70′s they CAN’t be president
but they better have a massive set of Pro’s and have an unbelievable VP backing them up.
you can not take age out of the equation…
and yes not only not take it out of the equation…but it’s analysis should carry a bit of weight.
A President not finishing their term…is a massive hurdle for the nation to jump…and guess what it happens 1 out of 3 times.
so is it important to see how healthy (the risk factors of reoccurence of cancer…not for death but just ability to serve the full term) and age.
and what does this guy do?
His judgment to take care of us if this 33% chance occurrence were to happen…
Palin would be the leader of the free world.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THIS SYSTEM NOW..
BY REFORMING THE PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES
TO ONE DAY ELECTIONS…….
Posted by: Nicholas | Oct 12, 2008 2:10:49 PM
No way. That is the path to getting the richest and most famous elected. We would have Steve Forbes and the Clintons if it were a one day winner take all nomination.
By having New Hampshire among the first, any person may campaign and be heard.
NO thanks to your effort to re-elect the insiders and billionaires by having to run in all states at once. It is a terrible idea. Even having Michigan first is a dumb idea. Or Florida. Too big, too expensive. Only the rich and famous could do it.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

and Nicholas
if Mccain were elected over 50% of Americans would be hurt.
so what is your point.

Posted by: dl | October 12, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

liberati
Crying racist for anything said against Obama is no more sad than crying sexist for anything said against Palin or Clinton. There is a great deal of both racism and sexism in America, as well as people taking the backlash too far in the other direction. People are people.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 12, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Independent
You are the one causing the division, not Obama.

Posted by: jock59801 | October 12, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Dl, You are pushing the same line of reasoning as the obama camp (now there’s a surprise, huh?). Trust us– Obama is fine. Nothing to see here, move along.
Yes, most likely Barack Obama is a perfectly healthy 47 year old. But a one page letter from his doctor stating this just won’t cut it, thank you. If there’s nothing wrong with him, then what’s the harm in releasing his medical records, as other candidates have done in the past. I used to know George Bush’s heart rate, for criminee’s sake (and it was impressively low, btw).
You see, Obama is a middle-aged black male. that group has higher levels of high blood pressure and heart disease than the general population, so what are Obama’s numbers like, we’d like to know. Obama is a past (and occasionally present) smoker of cigarettes, which has health consequences. Has it done any damage to him? And, by his own admission (lest I be attacked as a thug slandering the man), Obama has taken drugs in his past, including cocaine, which can often damage the heart muscle. So, it makes perfect sense for people to ask that he be transparent about his health.
If there’s nothing to worry about, a complete release of records, or at least a more thorough release than we have had so far, would easily lay the matter to rest. Sorry, but if you are going to get all exercised about my candidate’s health even though he has been closely monitored his whole career and has been open about health issues as they arose, then you are going to have to show me that your candidate does not require the same scrutiny. Telling me he is healthy because he says so isn’t going to cut it.

Posted by: moderate | October 12, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

No it isnt acceptable. No type of discrimination is acceptable in today’s society. However, questioning whether a candidate’s age may affect his ability to serve out his/her term in office is relevant.
The question is, when is media going to actually acknowledge that the McCain campaign is truly inciting hatred among their troops..time to get your heads out of the sand & quit trying to argue that both sides are equal in their attacks. Doing so only compounds the problem.
In the Time today, Karen Tumulty reports the head of the Virginia GOP actually telling volunteers to compare Obama to Bin Laden!!! Equal attacks…get real folks!!!
Like so many of my fellow Canadians , I cant believe the media can in all honesty believe the two are even comparable!!Its time to really step down on this rhetoric!!

Posted by: Dee | October 12, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

WOW – For a really dumb article, this one sure brought out some of the best comments I have read EVER. Great job Patriot: “Every adult human body, becomes less competent with greatly advancing age. It IS NOT ageism to recognize that fact and act accordingly.” Kudos to TRW: “I see next week is going to be false equivalency week. This is the repeated cycle in the campaign. When McCain acts out, the media feels that it is there duty to try to find equally damning behavior from Obama to appear fair and balanced.” And bravo Bemused: “4. Concerns about McCain’s health and consequently his ability to serve out the term he is running for is made much more salient by the presence of Palin as his running mate, since she is patently unqualified to step into the role of president. No false equivalences please.”
It is heartening to know that SOME Americans still have higher level thinking skills! Best comments EVER!

Posted by: Ann Wong | October 12, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Sen. John McCain’s wife and father-in-law continued a lucrative business partnership with disgraced financier Charles H. Keating Jr. for 11 years after the GOP presidential nominee said he ended his close friendship with Keating in March 1987.
Cindy McCain’s business partnership with Keating in a real-estate development between 1986 and 1998 netted her a tidy profit, in addition to years of significant tax benefits. Her father, who died in 2000, earned similar returns.

Posted by: McHooverville | October 12, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

OH, dl, I forgot to address another of your rantings– that tired old chestnut about the chances of McCain dying in office. You claim that one in three presidents does not serve out his term and his vp steps in. Let’s get serious here. FOr the moment, we are focusing on McCain’s FIRST TERM. Everyone will have a chance to reevaluate after 4 years, when he will be 4 years older and Sarah Palin 4 years more experienced, to decide if they want to give him another term, with as always the possibility of him not finishing his term.
So let’s look at how many presidents did not survive their first term. It isn’t just 2/3 of them, now is it? In fact, 8 presidents have died in office, out of 42 men who have served (Grover Cleveland held two non-consecutive terms). So that’s not 33 percent for openers– it’s more like 20%. But three of those who died in office– Lincoln, McKinley, and FDR– were not in their first terms. First term deaths? Less than 12%. And that includes three men who were assassinated– a fate McCain is no more likely to face than any other person serving. Your argument is all about his health causing him to die in office. So if you’re going to throw around statistics based on past presidents, then let’s get it straight– only 3 men have died in their first term because of ill health (and 2 of those were in the 19th century, for goodness sake). So that brings the odds of this happening, if you are silly enough to argue that the past is prologue here, to 7%. That’s hardly a 1 in 3 chance, now is it?

Posted by: moderate | October 12, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Is an enterprise having retirement age ageism? lol
The Presidency of the US is one of the most demanding job in the world!
If 65 is max for a private enterprise, then McCaint is way TOO OLD for one of the most demanding job in the world!
That is not ageism!
That’s the reality of the waning capacity of an OLD ADULT BODY, regardless to whom it belongs.
America’s challenges are too great for someone as old as McCaint. Not even a private enterprise would hire someone of McCaint’s age.

Posted by: Patriot | October 12, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Lee – Dr. DeBakey was a wonderful surgeon, but let me assure you that although he may have been present during those surgical procedures, he was not doing them himself. But the analogy is moot – McCain is not DeBakey.
It seems that many on here are upset that we are not talking about the issues important to them (ACORN, Ayers, etc) and want to talk about other things more important to most of us (economy, health care, etc).
On health care, McCain’s proposals are a disaster. Do you realize that your doctor already has to deal with 30-40 health plans? McCain’s plan with double or triple this. Do you really think that if you find a great deal on health insurance in Montana that your doctor in Minnesota is going to accept it? No, what will happen is doctors will stop accepting insurance altogether. You’ll have to pay on the spot and then hope your insurance reimburses you.

Posted by: doc | October 12, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Based on actuarial data, a 72-year-old US man has a 12 year life expectancy with a 3-4% risk per year of dying. That does not account for a previous history of melanoma. It also does not include morbidities like stroke or dementia that are more prevalent in the age range. So, it’s roughly a 20-25% chance that McCain will be incapacitated (or dead) in the next four years.

Posted by: doc | October 12, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Obama is a Christian not a Muslim.
If he was a muslim people would not be talking about Reverend Wright.
He is also an American.
By the there are Americans who are Muslims as well. Even white Americans that are Muslims.

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

THE MANIPULATION OF OBAMA IN PRIMARIES
AND CAUCUSES IT HAPPENED IN MY OWN
HOME STATE ALONG WITH OTHER STATES…
I KNOW THE FACTS……
OBAMA MANIPULATED THE SYSTEM……..
WHITE AMERICA DOESN’T LIKE OBAMA….
IF HE GETS ELECTED,HE WILL HAVE A
HARD TIME TO GOVERN…..

Posted by: Nicholas | October 12, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Isn’t “erratic” what being “a maverick” is all about?

Posted by: 88 | October 12, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Yes, ageism is suddenly okay, apparently, because The One says it is okay. Just as he and his campaign made condescending sexist statements about Hillary (my personal “favorite”– “Oh, Hillary, you’re likeable enough) all the while denying there was any such thing going on, they are going after McCain hammer and tong while shaking their heads sadly that anyone would think they were doing any such thing. Just words, I guess.
Here I thought that the last acceptable prejudice was that against the obese, but I was wrong. There is no systematic condemnation of what the Obama campaign is doing with these insults to McCain, but the McCain campaign gets accused of racism peremptorily — Obama tells us that they are going to play the race card even thought they never had and still have not. Whole segments of the talking heads shows on CNN and MSNBC are devoted to hand-wringing about how racism will affect the election– with the assumption, of course, that the only way it can affect the results is to deny Obama election. black people who do not vote for McCain are not in danger of being labelled racist, but white people who do not vote for Obama are, apparently. No one is showing concern about the insults to seniors implicit in the attacks on McCain. No one is trotting out talking heads to discuss whether people’s outdated ideas about aging are suppressing the vote for McCain, now are they?
McCain is a steady, solid, healthy, vigorous, intelligent man fully capable of serving as president. Obama and company know that to be true but still want to convince you otherwise. I hope people are more intelligent than to fall for those efforts.

Posted by: moderate | October 12, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Let’s check guilt by association. lol
Obama merely associates with someone with questionable past; while McCaint is an ACTUAL CROOK!
McCaint is a CROOK, a McKeating Five CROOK who robbed taxpayers of billions!
Obama associates it the crooked McCaint in the US Senate.
Should Obama be penalized for associating with the crooked McKeating McCaint? lol
Obama may be associated with someone.
McCaint is an ACTUAL THIEF, who traded campaign finance kickback as payment for allowing Keating to rob Americans of BILLION of dollars!

Posted by: Patriot | October 12, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Sexism is always OK it seems, ageism too, but God forbid you say “that one” and they say it’s racist. The only ones who keep throwing out the racism slam is OBAMA AND HIS TEAM, to garner more votes.
At this point we are all voting who we think represents THIS country best,as when it comes to finance, they each have their advisors, neither is an expert in the economy and THERE IS NO MONEY! So economy is not THE issue I will vote on…..it will be character, judgement, track record and PATRIOTISM!
NEVER OBAMA, THE FRAUD AND SUIT
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!!!!!!!

Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 12, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Moderate what is sexist about the comment “Oh, Hillary, you’re likeable enough”
Did I miss a meeting or something?

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Both Obama and his wife said that the comment “that one” was NOT racist but it was disrespectful

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“Patriot”– I keep trying to get out of here, but I just could not let your comment pass. McCain is NOT a criminal, as you probably know perfectly well. Yes, he was one of the Keating Five, but he was exonerated of any wrong doing. When Bennett investigated the case, he recommended dropping McCain and John Glenn from the group entirely, as they had done nothing wrong. However, since McCain was the ONLY REPUBLICAN accused (a fact Democrats conveniently gloss over), the politicians looking into the matter were of course unwilling to drop him. But McCain was open with investigators and the public, has written extensively about what he learned from the incident, and was NEVER charged with any crime, let along convicted of one. You should be ashamed of yourself, “patriot,” but I’m sure you won’t be.

Posted by: moderate | October 12, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

people say they are voting on judgement and moderat convieniently glossed over the fact the McCain was not exonerated from Keating5 he was found to have shown POOR JUDGEMNET. And he/she didn’t answer my question about sexism.

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Obama accuses others of bigotry when he is the biggest bigot of all.

Posted by: mike | October 12, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

McCain didn’t defeat death three times to not serve this country in it’s highest office. This guy IS THE ENERGIZER BUNNY and was down and out back in the beginning of the primaries, carrying his lugguge through the airports to go from State to State. Just finished watching a pathetic bio on Obama, with NO CHARCTER WITNESSES or history of any sort deserving of the WH.
McCAINS FAMILY HAVE SERVED THIS COUNTRY FOR OVER 100 YEARS, AND AS FAR BACK AS GENERAL WASHINGTON.
Obama doesn’t deserve it with 143 days in Senate, 130 Present votes, dubious upbringing by two Muslim dads and Atheist mom, radical ties, names too many to mention here. HE IS UNACCEPTABLE. I wish he were white, as he wouldn’t even be in this race with his background, …..lib media looks the other way and shoves him down our throats. This is like Flight 93 and some good ‘ol Americans will have to rush the cockpit and take down this plane (Obama campaign) before it hits the Capitol!
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!

Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 12, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Again, it is McCain that brings up his age whenever he brings up Obama’s inexperience. And in those debates against Obama, unfortunately for McCain he just looks even older.
Since when does age not matter? If it didn’t, there wouldn’t be an age minimum for running for President. The point is less McCain’s age but rather the mixed message campaign he has been running.
Even on here you guys can’t keep your talking points straight. One moment you have to brand Obama as a terrorist muslim, while the next McCain is saying ‘whoops, sorry, he’s an okay dude’. It’s hard to argue against people who don’t know where they stand.

Posted by: MIguy | October 12, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

People keep claiming sexism but never offer any proof that the Obam’s campaign is being sexist. Is it secist to ask a woman the same question you would ask a man in the same situation? I personally don’t think so I think it would be sexist not to ask her these questions. In fact I would agree that the media has been sexist in their questioning of Gov. Palin for the exact opposite reason that you are probably saying they are sexist (but then I don’t know that because you don’t give any reason for your accusations of sexism in the media) because all the media has done so far is ask her easy soft-ball question like what newspapers she reads which she couldn’t answer for three days. I for one am afraid of the idea that she could possibly become our president if anything were to happen to McCain because if it takes three days to respond to an easy question like that how long would it take her to respond to a national emergency? It took her just as long to respond to what she reads as it took Bush to respond to Katrina.
So what is your reasoning for crying sexism? I’m sure a lot of people would like to know.

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

josh….McCain was exhonerated and it was the three Dems that were guilty. McCain has fought corruption tooth and nail since that time in his life and he has my vote. He is a man of his word….now Obama…not so much….like how he told Sen. McCain he would take public financing and then DIDN’T!
He fips and flops whenever he has to because HE IS POLITICS AS USUAL.
GIVE ME CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN….
McCAIN/PALIN ALL THE WAY.

Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama '08 | October 12, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

The biggest joke of all are the Hillary supporters (real or fake) on here. You do realize most Republicans can’t stand Hillary? What exactly do you think the GOP campaign ads would be if she were the Democratic nominee? Nothing kind, let me guarantee you that.

Posted by: 1percenter | October 12, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Exonerated means to declare or prove blameless and in order to be blameless he would have had not be involved therefore he was not exonerated he was found not guilty of any wrong doing which not guilty does not equal innocent and I REPEAT HE WAS FOUND TO HAVE SHOWN POOR JUDGEMENT!!!!

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Obama is a chain smoker, he is probably more unhealthy than McCain.

Posted by: David | October 12, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I am so sick of flip flopping being a bad thing is it really a bad thing to change your opinion if you are proven wrong and don’t agree with your former opinion or is it a bad thing to stick by an opinion to no end even when your opinion is proven to be wrong. Don’t humans have the right to change their mind. I for one would never say that my opinion are always right and if given evidence that I am wrong I will change my opinion.
Does that make me a bad person or untrustworthy somehow?

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

occasional smoker and chain smoker are 2 different things. Where did you hear that he is a chain smoker? I have never heard that. Everything I have heard is he has the occasional cigarette.

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

To our shamelessly biased (not you, Jake) mainstream media, anything that helps theone get elected is acceptable, and anything that doesn’t help theone get elected is unacceptable. Any other questions?

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | October 12, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

, neither is an expert in the economy and THERE IS NO MONEY! So economy is not THE issue I will vote on…..it will be character, judgement, track record and PATRIOTISM!
NEVER OBAMA, THE FRAUD AND SUIT
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!!!!!!!
Posted by: Hope, Change, Hate, Nobama ’08 | Oct 12, 2008 2:55:59 PM
====================================
I’M WITH YOU………
I AGREE 100%………
I’M AN EX-DEMOCRAT TOO…..
BEST CHOICE IS:
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: Nicholas | October 12, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

McCain was exonerated (of his part in the S and L debacle and $500 billion bailout), and it was the three Dems that were guilty.
1. exonerated? NO. He was said to have exercised bad judgement.
2. The three Dems who were co-conspirators with McCain are no longer in the Congress.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

McCain with his active 96 years young mother HAS A BETTER CHANCE OF LIVING LONGER than Obama whose parents died young and he is a chain smoker.
- A McCain Democrat

Posted by: vs | October 12, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Thank God for Karma
You just don’t get it do you these are questions that need to be answered by both campaigns. I want to know the health of all the candidates. There is a link between age and health and there is a link between race and health. Any other question about age or race does NOT matter.
By the way your name doesn’t make any sense. Christians do not believe in karma.

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Where does this CHAIN SMOKER thing come from?

Posted by: Josh | October 12, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I have the pleasure of working with older adults. Many of whom are in their 70′s, very bright and active. They refuse to vote for McCain and do not mince words that the number one reason is his age.

Posted by: Paige | October 12, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

vs says “McCain with his active 96 years young mother HAS A BETTER CHANCE OF LIVING LONGER than Obama”
____________________________________________
Using your logic, McCain’s father died at the age of 70 so McCain should have been dead two years ago.

Posted by: Paige | October 12, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Palin abuses her employees. Did anyone notice that?
She makes them do illegal activities, on pain of being fired. That was in the report.
PS. A Republican is suing her, over her use of Yahoo to avoid the Freedom of Information Act. By making her employees use Yahoo, she is making them choose between doing illegal behavior and being fired for not being ‘supportive’. <= her words about the police commissioner and about the librarian. Imagine a librarian being supportive of the mayor? What's that about? Not quick enough to go along with book banning, that's what!!
Palin is in denial now, and says she didnt break a law. No?! She broke a statute in the first case and three other statutes in the Yahoo case. Statutes are laws, Governor.
VOTE OBAMA in 08

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

“My fellow prisoners”…. (McCain’s bizarre words to the debate audience, during debate #2!!)
That’s a clue, the end is near. Alzheimers.
*****
vs says “McCain with his active 96 years young mother HAS A BETTER CHANCE OF LIVING LONGER than Obama”
____________________________________________
Using your logic, since McCain’s father died at the age of 70 then McCain should have been dead two years ago.
In truth, the exact past of McCain’s two parents will not be replicated in McCain’s lifetime. He spent five years in prison. The life we lead is another determining factor.
“My fellow prisoners”…. (McCain’s bizarre words to the debate audience, during debate #2!!)
That’s a clue, the end is near. Alzheimers.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | October 12, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

It is as wrong to condemn a person because of his age as it is race and gender but the Obama people ignore that completely. Senator McCain Mom is up and about and she is in ther 90s. One family health history and age at death is a important factor by doctors, health insurance companies and even our government policies. Remember, Obama’s parents certainly died at a young age. That means that Obama is much more likely to die young.
Obama has made so many gaffes and misstatements, even policy decisions that he changes again and again, one must wonder if he has the intelligent capacity to be President. I think his high education creditials are over-rated. Common sense does not prevail in his campaign–truth like the Democrats are responsible for the sub-prime mortgage mess, not the Bush Administration. Yet on the stump yesterday and today, he keeps blaming the wrong party. That is not intelligence–that is stupidity.

Posted by: Mary | October 12, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Josh ask “Where does this CHAIN SMOKER thing come from?”
_______________________________________________
Probably off the same brochure distributed by volunteers of the McCain campaign in Minnesota that said he was an Arab. That is where that lady got the information to ask the question in the townhall about Obama. Andrew Sullivan has the details at The Atlantic.

Posted by: Paige | October 12, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I think most women would agree that ageism is not acceptable. Could we ever imagine a 72-year-old female, four time melanoma survivor, running for President?
However, I do think that McCain’s age and medical history matters because if something happens to McCain, we’re stuck with Palin.
The word “erratic” has nothing to do with McCain’s age. It is the definition of his campaign: lack of consistency, regularity, or uniformity.
And McCain IS confused. Sunni/Shia, Prime Minister of Spain, Czechoslovakia still exists, Iraq/Pakistan border, etc.
But none of these words would incite people at Obama’s rallies to say of McCain, “off with his head”.

Posted by: cincyr | October 12, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Mary writes “McCain Mom is up and about and she is in ther 90s. One family health history and age at death is a important factor by doctors, health insurance companies and even our government policies. ”
________________________________________________
Using YOUR logic, McCain’s father died at the age of 70 so McCain should have died two years ago.

Posted by: Paige | October 12, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

It’s too darn bad Rep. John Lewis, or whoever, doesn’t get his britches in a bunch over the nasty libels that fall out of Gibbs’ mouth every time he goes on television.
Pretty-boy Obama may pretend to be the sweetest thing since sliced sugar cane, but every glimpse of Gibbs reminds the watchful voter that nobody represented by him is really more than a thug, rhetorically speaking.
Get up EARLY, little liberals, and catch this piggish white man on “Morning Joe” …

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 12, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

It’s too darn bad Rep. John Lewis, or whoever, doesn’t get his britches in a bunch over the nasty libels that fall out of Gibbs’ mouth every time he goes on television.
Pretty-boy Obama may pretend to be the sweetest thing since sliced sugar cane, but every glimpse of Gibbs reminds the watchful voter that nobody represented by him is really more than a thug, rhetorically speaking.
Get up EARLY, little liberals, and catch this piggish white man on “Morning Joe” …

Posted by: Belle Starr | October 12, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

—JR. Come on, McCain is losing his ‘BEARS’. Did he have them on a chain, in his car or on his couch?.
Talk about McCain and his brain draining. Seems those blastimg him are in more dire straights for intelligent thinking than he is. Also, remember Obama thought there were 57 states and dead soldiers in his audience. The comments of the Obama supporters are outright stupid. Any derogotory remarks against an opponent to help the great Obama is OK.

Posted by: Mary | October 12, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Though am Obama supporter, am not blind to some of the subtleties of the sprint phase of this campaign. Yesterday in Philadephia on one stop covered by C Span my candidate said … and that’s why John McCain is out of time. I winced. All righty, it’s a competition and everybody’s using whatever they can but that’s a moment Obama is responsible for. The polls are looking good for him and the voting starts any minute here in Oregon and the West Coast is certainly Obama’s so why would I wince, disliking the tenor of the Other Campaign as I do? I thought better of Obama, that’s all. The whole election was a long drama in the results of affirmative action … all three major candidates represented different protected sectors, race, gender, age. So it’s not easy to parse out the real issues. For me, as an certified elder, how much time John McCain’s got only matters if he is president, which looks unlikely. So Obama needs to get back on his luminous high road and just keep running.

Posted by: Gaias Child | October 12, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

It is not ageist to say that McCain is too old to be behind the wheel; that is an opinion borne of fact. Age affects your mental acuity, race does not. Ageism would be laughing at McCain because he is old, but who is doing that? His age should be a major factor in this election, and he has done very little so far to give us confidence that he is up to the task of being the president.

Posted by: GE | October 12, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

First, I think there is a false equivalency here in reading into Obama’s language to show them at the same level. While there may be a bit of ageism going around, it is nothing compared to the overt racism and sexism that have been apparent.
Second, just because it has to do with age doesn’t make it ageist. Calling John McCain “erratic” isn’t code for old, but a reflection of a campaign that is bouncing around, changing positions all of the time. It shows he’s UNSURE of his position, not saying something about his age. Obama quoted USA Today in that ad. I know this is one example, but I feel that many are similarly distorted.
Third, I think the comments about McCain “forgetting” do cross the line and are unacceptable.
Fourth, competency is more related to age than gender or race. I believe that in general it is reasonable to ask whether someone of a certain age can handle the mental requirements of the Presidency, whereas I do not think it is reasonable to ask such a question about race. At this basis, it is therefore more acceptable to raise age as an issue than race (race may be raised in terms of, say, ability to gain support, but not in terms of competency).
Fifth, ageism is also more acceptable than other -isms like raceism and sexisms because it has nothing to do with a sociopolitical history of oppression. Black people were slaves. Women couldn’t vote, work, or own property. What are the similar power structures that similarly kept the elderly down? There are none.

Posted by: Mike | October 12, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Why do legitimate concerns about the ability of someone who is clearly a doddering old coot to run our country at one of the most dangerous times in its history have to get dismissed as “age-ism”? John McCain is old and sick and he is clearly unfit to be president. Age, in his case, is not the only factor, but it is a factor. If he seemed less infirm or more mentally together, then maybe it wouldn’t be a factor. But it is not some sort of illegitimate discrimination for voters to consider whether his age is a problem.

Posted by: Elizabeth | October 12, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

As an Obama supporter,just some constructive criticism:
Image, sadly, counts far more than substance these days. Yes, youth and beauty is prized. Would Obama have been so widely supported if he lacked youth and beauty…. I wonder….
McCain first sends out a “bad ad” relating Obama to celebrity worship and him as a Paris Hilton type. Is this smear.. not really! (A lot of people were taken in by his image, not content). Then Paris, et all calls him old– is this smear, yes! Then Obama’s team sends out an ad about McCain’s health (?) (bad bad bad- a real smear).
What does this result? The McCain campaign having to with young Sarah Palin over brilliant experienced Reb women. Because that’s what the people want: youth and energy over substance.

Posted by: Jess | October 13, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Ageism is not about someone unfit.
Agesim is about two people who do an EQUAL job.
However, the one who is elder is perceived as doing less- having less ability– and the younger one getting better support, opportunities and options.
I don’t think McCain looks like he lacks energy at all!! He appears smart and energetic. Erratic– that’s been there for all the candidates at times– the stress might be a factor at times for all. Sometimes McCain looks more energetic than Obama and Palin, in fact. He is a war hero– and who could have done that much!
(( By the way, I am an intended Obama supporter.. but I have to call out ageism here in the play– it’s there. ))

Posted by: Briggs | October 13, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Proof positive that ageism exists:
McCain having to go on the Couric show to protect Palin and sort it out!! He looked far more energetic and intelligent than her deer-in-the-headlights silly look. Sorry– but all you McCain bashers– what the heck is this??!! McCain seems to be the brains and Palin the show. This is ageism.
I have seen it all the time in the corp world: they will give a junior “energy type” all the big projects and interface with the clients– and the senior in the background has to bail the kid out! No joke!! This is AGEISM!
(( By the way, Mr. McCain- you have all my respect. Only thing- policies: Please get the Reb party to reform the corrupt health care plan. You’ll get MORE votes that way. Because for now, Obama still has my vote because of pure economics. That’s it. ))

Posted by: Nelly | October 13, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Fact: McCain is 70 + years old.
By most standards, that’s freakishly old. I’m glad the man is alive, but do I want him running our country? No.
Fact of the matter is, McCain could (heaven forbid) die at any moment. Sarah Palin as number 2? You gotta be kidding me.
It’s not ageism, it’s dealing with the fact that McCain’s age is a bigtime con.

Posted by: C'mon | October 13, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

I think talking about Sen. McCain’s age is approprirate if it impacts his job performance. Talking about McCain’s erratic behavior is relevant to the office he seeks, as is his outdated Cold War-era world view, or inability / unwilligness to embrace new technology.
Also, McCain himself made his age an issue by picking as his running mate Gov. Palin, who is utterly unqualified to be a 72-year old heartbeat away from the presidency.

Posted by: Gene | October 13, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

According to historians’ rankings, our best presidents were older – Reagan (6th), Harry Truman (7th), Dwight Eisenhower (8th) vs. younger presidents John Kennedy (15th), Clinton (22nd), and Carter (34th).

Posted by: Rich Ng | October 13, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.