Comments on: “Whistleblower” Civil Suit Filed Against Bank in Rezko Land Deal

By: Efrain Juarez jersey

Efrain Juarez jersey — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:10:00 +0000

wonderful sharing, very resourceful. I like it a lot. I come acoss your article by baidu search engine. I shall visit your site weekly and share it to my gangs. Please keep it fresh. Keep on the good work. – A friend from abroad

By: SeattleBruce

SeattleBruce — Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:18:51 +0000

What a bunch of fools would elect a smooth talking politician that will continue to talk and talk – and do nothing – or worse act like a communist/socialist/radical. We may as well elect a used car salesman – do you really think Obama has your best interests in mind and not his own, and not the leftist wing in the D party? Come on folks!

By: PA_Voter

PA_Voter — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:04:19 +0000

Well, it just may have something to do with Obama…. Possibilities:
1) Had the land been valued at $500K and IF the owners really wanted $2,275K for both parcels, then BHO might have had to kick in another $125K to make both deals go through.
2) The real kicker is that Obama wanted to use the 1/6th value line to give Rezko money back… He paid him about $104,500 for the land (about 1/6 of the total “value”). SO if the land was only worth $500K, Obama would have only been able to kick-back $83,300 to Rezko using his ridiculous “1/6th value rule”. Therefore, in effect Obama might have given Rezko $21,000 over his “1/6th value rule” (which is still way over-priced from the real value of the 10-foot wide piece of ground that I believe Obama had apraised at around $40,000.)
Just a few thoughts as how it may involve Obama….

By: Sharonklim

Sharonklim — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:31:31 +0000

This is a definite Republican setup. Where was he through Rezko trial??? It is now three years since incident happened???
Suit – I don’t even see that he notified Mutual Bank a claim was filed – any claim always cc’s copy to name and address -bank??? Not there!!
Any claim filed always cc copy to party sued. Refer to last page. Bottom of page
Read through claim legal reference to law supporting a purported stance is non-existant.
Listing of Illinois Criminal Statutes – amateur & non-professional – appears not written by attorney – no attorney would list as such when referring to pertinent laws, regulations, violations, & lastly saying similar laws and state banking regulations- Refer to page 9 #20
Where are the Exhibits they mention???
There is no evidence supporting???
Releasing this to damage Obama would have included – attachments are part of suit????
Won’t even bother to read anymore!!!
I rest my case. This claim appears to be fraud or a real stupid, stupid inept attorney!!!

By: why?

why? — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:20:45 +0000

Obama = wealth redistribution
I’ve worked hard to earn what I’ve gotten. I am over the earned income credit, so the taxes I pay into the government is kept by the government.
Now Obama wants to give those who already pay no income taxes more of a credit. HOW CAN HE SUSTAIN THIS WITH THE HUGE DEFICIT THE COUNTRY HAS?
On top of that, he says he will increase spending by $100 trillion. There’s no way he can lower my taxes – there’s just no way to do it, give lower income earners even more of a credit and continue the level of government spending, let alone increase, as he has said – there is no doubt that if this is Obama’s plan, it means a tax INCREASE at some point, no matter what he says now.
Think about it rationally, not in the context of what party you support or that this could be a “historic” presidency.
Also, remember one thing – if Obama wins, he will be supported by a Democratic majority, including Pelosi and Reid. Basically, he will have close to unlimited power. DO WE REALLY KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT THIS MAN – EVEN TAKING AWAY THINGS LIKE WRIGHT, REZKO, AYERS, ACORN, MICHELLE OBAMA’S STATEMENTS AND EVEN OBAMA’S OWN STATEMENTS (“Redistribute the wealth,” “angry white folks clinging to their bibles and guns”) – THINK ABOUT THIS RATIONALLY BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE.
PLEASE!!!

By: independentview

independentview — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:55:12 +0000

“Cooking the books!” The higher appraisal on the land made up for what Obama paid for the house, which was $300,000 less than market value. Barrack needed the house to be priced so he could qualify for the loan.
To make up the difference, Rezko dealt for a high appraisal on the land to make up the difference to the seller. So, the seller receives his asking price for the two properties, and Obama gets a deal courtesy of Rezko and Mutual Bank Corp.
Obama got Reko funding for a housing project, but there is no connection here, or political favors.

By: independentview

independentview — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:52:55 +0000

By: Sharonklim

Sharonklim — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:57:45 +0000

This is ridiculous!! Appraisal and actual selling price are irrelevant. This is old news that has been extensively investigated in the past.
I have had enough Republican tactics to fall for this new tactic.
I have enough real estate knowledge and can clearly see a scam.

By: Susan

Susan — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:28:04 +0000

Obama is using sophisticated hidden hypnosis techniques when he speaks. That’s why all the OBAMABOTS exist. They don’t think rationally for themselves & are therefore “blank slates” & easy targets for this type of manipulation on a massive scale. WAKE UP PEOPLE! HELLO!

By: katherine

katherine — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:08:01 +0000

Well, let’s see….Obama gave Rezko a $14 million dollar contract for a senior center amongst other contracts…coincidence? It’s called kickback for those of you in denial about Obama’s angel status. You will be electing a corrupt Chicago politican who is basically unqualified to be president. Go ahead ….if elected, you will find out there will be no “change.”