Wieseltier’s Caveat-Laden Endorsement
What may be most interesting in Leon Wieseltier’s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in The New Republic are the concerns to which he gives voice.
"For all his articulateness," he writes of Obama, "I still do not know what most moves Obama–what are the two or three grand proposals that he would put before the Congress and the country in the early months of his administration, which is all the respite from the madness of politics that any administration will ever get; and I cannot shirk the feeling, as I watch him rise, that I am witnessing not so much the triumph of a cause as the success of a plan."
He admits, "I must say that the Ayers affair rankles me, because I would not shake the man’s dirty hand; and the fact that Obama was eight years old at the time of the Weather Underground is no more pertinent to his moral and historical awareness than the fact that he was six years old at the time of the King assassination."
"Obama’s passionlessness spooks me," says the literary critic. "His friends tell me that my impression is wrong, but I long ago gave up on personal assurances about politicians."
Of the success of the surge, he writes, "the grudging way Obama treats the reversal in Iraq, when he treats it at all, is disgraceful. Tyrants and génocidaires would sleep less soundly during a McCain presidency. And yet it is impossible any longer to ignore the contradiction between the nobility of his past and the ignobility of his present…"
Of international affairs, Wieseltier writes, "What a time for a novice! I dread the prospect of Obama’s West Wing education in foreign policy: even when he spoke well about these matters in the debates, it all sounded so new to him, so light. He must not mistake the global adulation of his person with the end of anti-Americanism. And he must not mistake his hope for the world with his analysis of the world."
These are just the reservations, of course. But quite an interesting read.
– jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Good grief. Obama stands for nothing more than BRAND OBAMA, nothing less than a CORPORATE BRAND. The brand does not represent policies of interest to our country, the brand is solely focused on moving BRAND OBAMA forward, with continual adjustment of the message to sustain its momentum. Prove to me its anything less and I may buy you a COKE. This is Marketing 101 at its finest hour.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | October 26, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
As I read this endorsement, I had a horrible sinking feeling in my gut. It came as I read, “and I cannot shirk the feeling, as I watch him rise, that I am witnessing not so much the triumph of a cause as the success of a plan.”
Something has bothered me about Obama from day one, and I’ve read all of the information on both sides,…but it hit me just then. This guy is dead on. Obama is going to win this election, and it has been planned for many, many years. What have we created?
Posted by: really scared | October 26, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
hmmmm……………….
Likes to hear himself speak I gather. Perhaps by endorsing, someone will listen to him, or perhaps he thinks it makes him sound important.
Either way he is full of himself and I would send his endorsement back marked undeliverable.
Posted by: Thinking | October 26, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
It’s so funny to watch Conservatives struggle and flounder and flail and lash out in coming terms with the fact that the Neo-Conservative ideology has irretrievably failed.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | October 26, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
I’d be curious what two or three things most move Leon Weiseltier.
Trying to make common, trite opinions sound pithy and clever might be one of them.
Posted by: Danny | October 26, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
West Coast Mess:
And just what is the “Real McCain” if not a brand that has not found a marketing slogan that works.
This “endorsement” is one that Senator Obama can do without, because its superficial claims do not bear out research, but simply speak to fear-laden right-wing talking points so easily repeated and spread by the right-wing nuts who rear their ugly heads on this blog.
I had the pleasure of seeing Senator Obama speak in Reno today an he is far from passionless — I term I would more easily apply to John McShame and even Sarah Palin, whose folksy variations in tone tend to mimic passion.
I am so glad this election is winding down and that we will soon be rid of Senator McShame and Governor Failin!
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: jackt51 | October 26, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
“the success of a plan.”
Posted by: RL in Illinois | October 26, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
Leon’s an astute LitCrit, but he’s also a crashing bore when it comes to capital hill. The problem with his back-handed “endorsement” (seriously: why even make one?) is that it’s so predictably cranky. On the occasional instances when he crawls out of his TNR hovel to wax political, my reaction is always the same: “Him again?” Followed by a long yawn.
Posted by: MarkS | October 26, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
ABC News is aware of a relationship between Vera Baker and Obama. Do you have any insight into why they’re not releasing it.
Posted by: Sayitso | October 26, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am
Hillary’s campaign originally obtained the story about Obama and Vera Baker. Now the democrats are sticking together and not revealing this. The urgency to have a democrat as president and as a majority in the house is too important to them.
So hide this, hide Obama not releasing documents proving his being a natural born citizen. The latter being a requirement of the constitution. But the agenda is more important than honesty and following laws.
Posted by: sayitso | October 26, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
Peggy Noonan, a conservative who wrote speeches for Reagan, described the current state of the GOP precisely:
“In the end the Palin candidacy is a symptom and expression of a new vulgarization in American politics. It’s no good, not for conservatism and not for the country. And yes, it is a mark against John McCain, against his judgment and idealism.”
Democracy is more then freedom of speech, it’s also being civil. There must be a sense of letting reason prevail.
The extreme NeoCon right-winged thugs have turned politics into a kind of circus. The GOP has become xenophobic, anti-intellectual, no style, no vision. It attracts all kind of wacko’s, ranging from preachers of hate and intolerance like Falwell to shouting maniacs like Bill O’Reilly. It’s no wonder that many moderate conservatives jump ships.
McCain has picked Palin and gone populist. He betrayed his own beliefs, what he stood for and thereby lost any respect I had for him.
Posted by: CLabs | October 26, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am
It doesn’t surprise me that the neo-Cons side with Obama. They have weakened our country and they want Obama to finish us. Elitists band together to turn us into a Socialist government.
Posted by: Joe Public | October 26, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
It’s incredible to read some of the comments here. It’s a fascinating window into the psyche of those on the right, and it’s a little scary, but mostly just sad, as in pathetic.
People seriously believe that Obama is not an American citizen? You do know that Obama is a US Senator, right? And
you must realize that the Constitution sets requirements for a Senator? It says: “No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.” In other words, one has to be a US citizen to even be a Senator! So, it’s crazy to think that Obama, or any other person for that matter, would be sworn in as a Senator without the proper documentation and evidence of US citizenship.
I’m really wondering what people are hoping to gain by believing in these hoaxes and flat out lies… There’s no vast conspiracy at work here, and people pushing these conspiracy theories would probably stop them if they knew just how crazy they sound.
You see, what you people are failing to understand is that our democracy has many built-in fail-safes, courtesy of the Constitution, that prevent the kind of nonsense some of you people are suggesting. No “cipher” can sneak in and overthrow government or establish some kind of “socialist” order. Why? Again, because of the Constitution, which sets eligibility requirements for the highest leadership posts and it also establishes the checks and balances that prevent any one person from having too much power. Do you people really believe that the Constitution doesn’t work? Because if you did, you wouldn’t be making the kinds of conspiracy charges that you’re making.
I’m sorry to burst your bubble, folks, but Obama is an American citizen. If you don’t like Obama’s policies, that’s your prerogative. But the fringe thinking’s gotta stop. I never thought that people who pretend to be so “pro-America” would argue that the Constitution — the heard of this great nation — is too weak to keep America intact. If that’s not anti-American, I don’t know what is.
Posted by: TruthSeekr | October 26, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am
Here is Wieseltier’s conclusion, for those who REALLY care about this endorsement:
Obama is a smart man. He is a decent man. He is an undangerous man, in the manner of all pragmatists and opportunists. He reveres reason, though he often confuses it with conversation. His domestic goals are good, though the titans of American finance, the greedy geniuses of Wall Street, may have made many of those goals fantastic. He will see to it that some liberalism survives at the Supreme Court. This leaves only the rest of the world. What a time for a novice! I dread the prospect of Obama’s West Wing education in foreign policy: even when he spoke well about these matters in the debates, it all sounded so new to him, so light. He must not mistake the global adulation of his person with the end of anti-Americanism. And he must not mistake his hope for the world with his analysis of the world. But OK, then: Obama, and another anxious visit to the ballot box, with–in the stinging words of Du Bois–”a hope not hopeless but unhopeful.”
Posted by: petra | October 26, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am
Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby Poll: Obama 49.4%, McCain 44.1%
McCain gains as race continues to tighten
Posted by: Steave Cuozzo | October 26, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
ABC could have done an in depth look at the people most important in Obama’ life, as to their own beliefs and visions for America, about society should work.
From that look, and from what Obama has said and done a composite could have been made of what would be most likely under an Obama Presidency, and Democrat Congress.
ABC could have cast an opinion about what America will look like four years from now.
Instead ABC has chosen to suppresss news, to edit interviews, to ignore the obvious, to make light of any story that could have negative implications for Obama.
There was a time when the MSM’s had the respect fo America, and I believe that is gone. ABC has joined the club of filtered news and sensationalism journalism chaired by the National Enquirer and The Daily Kos.
I suppose it is because ABC thinks and believes like Obama, and since we will have to wait and see what happens next. Wieseltier could be right. We have experienced a plan in Obama’s rise, not a cause.
If Obama is elected we will see if we then agree with the plan.
Posted by: independentview | October 26, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Sen. Obama warned regulators and the nation 19 months ago that the subprime lending crisis was a disaster in the making.
——————————————————————————
I guess if Obama says it enough, some idiots will believe.. Obama was knee deep in the debacle..
Posted by: Patti | October 26, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
What a great endorsement for the most heavily product of our time, Barack Obama®
Posted by: Thank you | October 26, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
You failed to point out any reason why he would vote Obama. For example, [on McCain] He is abstracted, dispersed, out of focus, Stockdalesque, mentally undone. Often he sounds simply unintelligent. … and McCain’s sense of reality seems to be narrowing. The financial crisis harshly exposed these limitations: it made McCain more dogmatic and more doctrinaire,
Posted by: thorfinn | October 26, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Bottom line: Obama is not Bush, McCain IS Bush.
While the Bush/McCain brand stands for alienating our allies, waging an unnecessary war, a failed economy, 5 tours in Iraq, a depleted military, lack of care for the wounded vets………
Obama’s brand stands for hope, and that’s sufficient. After the Bush/McCain mess, hope is overdue.
Despite the smears, Obama is not a muslim, not a terrorist, not a communist, not a socialist, and not a religious wing nut nor a BushBot.
Obama gets my vote!
Posted by: Gus | October 26, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Obama leads to government moving into the role of taking care of you, and government and politicians and, kind of moving in as the other half of your family to make decisions for you. Now they do this in other countries where the people are not free. Government as part of the family, taking care of us, making decisions for us. I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me.
Posted by: Steave Cuozzo | October 26, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Steave writes, “I don’t know what to think of having in my family Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me.”
====================================
That’s just sad. You would think, listening to men like yourself that the United States of America just fought for their freedom from the British, didn’t have any branches of government and simply went about its business all willy-nilly.
Please stop the nonsense. To suggest that revamping a “tax code” so that more middle-class Americans can actually get tax-breaks that have historically benefitted the wealthy is an attempt to “take care of you” is silly.
As far as the article above? The author, in typical “only we (white)know how to get things done” fashion is about as accurate as men and women who told Columbus the world was flat.
When John McCain admitted he didn’t know the difference between a Sunni and Shiite he lost ALL credibility with me. It seems the author was pretty comfortable with that ignorance because it seems John’s ignorance and lack of knowledge would terrify Islamic countries.
Maybe he’s right. (lol) Then again, if I’m part of the international community and an ally to the U.S. I’d be terrified as well. Which if you really think about it they currently are….Go figure.
Posted by: Dems | October 26, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Alaska’s Largest Newspaper Endorses Obama
The Anchorage Daily News endorses Obama!
Palins fav Newspaper is for Obama!
OBAMA 08
Posted by: MIKE NC | October 26, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Not all Obama supporters think he is the Messiah. I don’t — but I think he’s the much better candidate.
Obama will not continue the policies of the Bush administration. He is not a saber-rattler and will get us out of the insane war in Iraq. He will not appoint anti-abortion rights ideologues to the Supreme Court. He did not choose an unqualified wingnut for his running mate. He ran his campaign extremely well — a good clue of how he would run his administration.
And what is wrong with the “success of a plan” rather than the romantic nonsense of “the triumph of a cause”? After eight years of George Bush, I and millions of voters long for a competent pragmatist, and not someone who tries to force some ideal on his nation and the world.
Posted by: Alex | October 26, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
If more press people would express their reservations, I would feel better.
The more I hear from our journalists that they believe Obama is “transcendent”, the more uncomfortable I get.
He is a politician and we need the press to treat him like one.
Posted by: MayBee | October 26, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
It seems there is an enormous divide in America. It seems to be getting worse as the election gets closer.
Posted by: international | October 26, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Steave Cuozzo writes “… Uncle Barney Frank or others to make decisions for me.”
Franks is one of the more innocuous. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Chuck (take my picture) Schumer moving in and telling us who is a real American and how to run things is even more repugnant.
The authors reservation about Obama’s associates comes up. OK, Obama barely knew the Ayers, who the author said he would not shake his hand. Ayers hates America to this day. Surprisingly Rev. Wright holds pretty much the same opinions.
Posted by: today | October 26, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Today writes, “Ayers hates America to this day. Surprisingly Rev. Wright holds pretty much the same opinions.”
======================================
Let me be the first to say so what? Right now McCain is and has always surrounded himself with individuals who hate Americans who don’t look like them. You could put on a blindfold and toss a rock into a McCain crowd and I will guarantee you’d hit a racist. (lol) Which is worst? Having reservations or disliking your country’s policies or its people?
Posted by: Dems | October 26, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
With back-handed “endorsements” such as this, who needs opposition? I’ve always found Wiselteier’s literary criticsms to be dull, pedantic, and demonstrative of his firm grasp of the obvious. Why should his “endorsement” be any different from his usual writing style?
Posted by: chuck | October 26, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm