American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee Asks Rahm to Repudiate His Dad’s Comments
Upon hearing of his son’s new gig, the father of incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel was quoted in the Israeli newspaper Ma’Ariv, saying, “Obviously, he’ll influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to be mopping floors at the White House.”
This has prompted a letter from American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee heads Kareem Shora and former Rep. Mary Rose Oakar, D-Ohio, to the junior Mr. Emanuel, congratulating him and President-elect Obama, saying they are "deeply disappointed by comments made by your father, Mr. Benjamin Emanuel."
The ADC, they write, "views this characterization of an Arab as an unacceptable smear. One can readily imagine the justifiable outcry if someone made a similar remark about African-Americans, Jews, or Hispanics, concerning cleaning the floors of the White House. Do the normal standards of decency and civility not apply when talking about Arabs? ADC asks you to disavow and repudiate these remarks publicly. We sincerely hope you will distance yourself from any demeaning characterization of any ethnic, religious, or racial group."
President-elect Obama is cc’ed on the letter.
- jpt
UPDATE: A spokeswoman for Emanuel writes: “Today, Rep. Emanuel called Mary Rose Oakar, president of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and apologized on behalf of his family and agreed to meet with representatives of the Arab-American community at an appropriate time in the future."

Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
I would hope that people would awake to the political(view)that there’s a fighing over the BONE-mentality in this world..such character distinction is more blurred baloney(its)part of the sham.
Posted by: Mark S. M. | November 13, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
President Bush had a good amount of compassion for the problems..leaving people to come together gave us a storyline about(profound)(change)(passion)<<–its really about nothing at all.
Posted by: Mark S. M. | November 13, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
If it’s one thing in Politics I have grown to despise over the past 2 years; it’s the words denounce and repudiate. People have their own minds and will say what they believe; you can’t hold individuals accountable for what other individuals say.
Posted by: PoliticsAsUsual | November 13, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Welcome to the Big Leagues, Rahm and Barack!!
Posted by: robert b | November 13, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
he better apoligize, lmao they SUE !!!!
Posted by: like it or not here I come | November 13, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Why did Obama choose such a nasty bully as Emanuel for White House Chief of Staff?
Posted by: tina | November 13, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I’d like to be a fly on the wall when Rahm talks to his Father.
Posted by: Ranger Phx | November 13, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Why did Obama select the son of an Irgun terrorist for his chief of staff?
And how did Emanuel pass the Secret Service and FBI background checks?
Posted by: sivan | November 13, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
PoliticsAsUsual,
I agree with u on your feelings for those words. But i’ve also come to appreciate their value somehow. If people are constantly ‘repudiated’ for their distasteful remarks, the hope is that they will eventually realize how unacceptable some of their filth is. Unfortunately people do have their own minds and its not always that they put it to good use. That kind of condescending attitude towards any group of people should never be tolerated. I am personally afraid that if people are not publicly chastised for their ridiculous stereotypes (if it can even be called that), then that sort of intolerant behavior will grow rampant.
Intolerance should NOT be what America is about if America is to remain America. It is especially saddening to note that the person who made the remarks on this particular occasion was a doctor who is supposed to treat all people with compassion.
Posted by: Question | November 13, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
The Dow is still falling. I rarely admit mistakes. I voted for Obama because I thought he had the foresight to address the economy woes and ease the investors. I was wrong. I should have listened to my conscious. I voted for him because I am aa moderate democrat. My CPA said “..1000 points down for Obama..” He was wrong. Make that 2000. But capitulation is near — even the MSM have suspended operations. Look out ! — 7700.
My spouse has been out of a job for a year. What are you going to do about this Obama?
Posted by: Wow | November 13, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Wow: he’s not President yet – you obviously didn’t vote for him at all…
Posted by: MIguy | November 13, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Why should a son apologize for a father’s words?
His father is an adult.
Posted by: Cindy | November 13, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Wow – Sorry to hear about your problems. I work for the Labor Dept. so I have an idea how you are feeling. Obama isn’t President yet. He cannot do much of anything about anything. Talk the your President Geprge Bush about it.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 13, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Rahm’s dad can say whatever he wants to say. That is his free will and freedom. Are you going to ask your dad to shut up if he wants to say something? People just have to have enough confidence in themselves, and focus on what needs to be done rather. It’s only his opinion why become so shaky about it? In this world there will always be going to be people who will not like you and some will like you, throughout the history of humanity. Welcome to this world!!
Posted by: j | November 13, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
What was insulting? He didn’t suggest that Arabs mop the floor of the white house.
What he did was confirm that his son is pro-Israel (“What is he an Arab?”) and that he would be in a position of influence on the president (“He’s not going to be mopping floors at the White House.”)
Posted by: Marc R | November 13, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I think he should merely indicate he does not share his father’s views. We are not responsible for other’s remarks..even our parents! However, given he is Obama’s chief of staff, it would be prudent to say he does not agree with the remarks.
Posted by: Dee | November 13, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I think that most of us can admit to the fact that our viewpoints are different than our parents. It is a generational thing … lighten up, Rahm Emanuel is the best!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | November 13, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Obama is not President yet. Stop blaming him for anything that goes on within the next 2 months. Bush doesn’t seem to be doing too much. He’s just willing to let this country go totally down the toilet. What a President he will be remembered as. A real shame!
Posted by: geecee | November 13, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I did vote for Obama. Maybe not the one I am seeing now versus the candidate. I am a democrat so I would never vote for McCain no matter how left he goes. I did not vote for Bush either. I also worked the polls for Obama and my senator. So go to hell. Obama should say something about the market as Bush is a lame duck.
Posted by: Wow | November 13, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
HEY ALL YOU OBAMABOTS!! I NEED YOU TO TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT SOLEDAD’S INVESTIGATIVE REPORT THIS EVENING ON CNN AT 9:00 P.M. IT WILL GIVE YOU SOME INSIGHT ON WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO DRINK THE KOOL-AID.
Posted by: Karen | November 13, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The Road to the White, congress, everything goes through Israel. Look up the ADL intelligence gathering to understand why.
Posted by: hmn | November 13, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Gee, thanks Dad…
Posted by: phillygirl64 | November 13, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
SRAEL IS LAND GRABBING SCUM!!
WRITE YOUR AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVES AND ASK THEM WHY THEY ARE SPONSORING A LAND GRABBING TERRORIST STATE THAT KEEPS SICK CHILDREN AND OLD PEOPLE FROM GETTING MEDICAL SUPPLIES? A REGIME THAT BRINGS IN COMBAT TANKS AGAINST 12 YR OLD ROCK THROWERS?
WHY?
ISRAEL IS A NEO NAZI FASCIST LAND GRABBING SCUM NATION ,AND THEY SPEND GIGANTIC AMOUNTS OF $$ TO LOBBY AND GET SWEETHEART USA ECONOMIC AND MILITARY ASSISTANCE!! NO ONE HAS TO BE A SKINHEAD OR A NAZI TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST ISRAELI INJUSTICE TO PALESTINIANS!
TO CENSOR SUCH STATEMENTS RAILING AGAINST SUCH AN UNJUST REGIME AND AGENDA ,YOU MUST CONDONE THAT REGIME AND ITS AGENDA.
I AM PRAYING FOR YOU JAKE TAPPER ,AND THE REST OF THE MISGUIDED PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT ISRAEL AND ITS AGENDA OF RUTHLESS LAND POACHING AND CONFINING AND/OR TERRORIZING ITS NEIGHBORS.
Posted by: bah | November 13, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
HOW IS THIS GUY DIFFERENT THAN MEL GIBSON’S MOUTHY DAD?
?????
Posted by: bah | November 13, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Why should he have to Apologize for his Father A grown man Pluzzzeeeeee
Posted by: Angie | November 13, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
As a Lebanese, I find his father’s comments nothing short of despicable and racist. However, President-elect Obama has our trust and we trust his decision to delegate Rahm Emmanuel, who honorably called ADC and I agree, most of us have different views than our parents.
Wake up world, reject hatred and racism from wherever it comes from.
Posted by: Jean-Claude | November 13, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I don’t dare get into politics. I would have to spend all my time denouncing and repudiating things my crazy kinfolk say.
Posted by: Shockolit | November 13, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
They had a right to ask for an apology. The quote was completely unacceptable. I’m surprized that they got an apology out of Emanuel and I’m glad. Maybe there is some hope for peace.
Posted by: Mara | November 13, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
This just keeps getting better & better. The next four years will be filled with apologies & hand wringing over politically incorrect statements made by democrat apparatchiks. With the dems in charge of everything we can just sit back & watch them all twist slowly in the wind.
Posted by: paulejb | November 13, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Obama should just make a blanket apology now for all the stupid things that dems or their friends or relatives say about protected groups. He can include in his apology a sop to the same sex marriage crowd by scolding blacks who voted for proposition 8 in California. Just imagine folks, 4 years of gasbaggery by the new vice-president will have Obama in permanent apologetic mode.
Posted by: paulejb | November 13, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
This is awesome. I felt a great relief after election day.
No longer can libs pound and pound and pound the Republicans.
You have ALL the power now. We expect PERFECTION. Otherwise, you will be treated EXACTLY the same as you treated President Bush.
By the way, when will our tax cut checks be mailed out? It had better be soon. I want mine. Obama promised! Over and over again, he promised!
Ah yes, nothing to do but watch and complain and nitpick and call names.
Sweeeeet!
Posted by: merle | November 13, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Hey, who DOESN’T have a family member or parent that’s, how should I say it, off their rocker?
I’m not too terrible worried about this and I think that this is only news to the bottom feeders out there (of which there are many I suppose). I’m glad Rahm’s going to talk to them and has apologized but I certainly hope we won’t be subjected to a string of “outcries” followed by dog & pony show public apologies every time his old man opens his prejudiced mouth. The guy is obviously a nasty individual with nasty opinions. He’s shown the world where he wears his hat so let’s put him back in obscurity where he and his toxic opinions belong! :D
Posted by: James | November 13, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
“Today, Rep. Emanuel called Mary Rose Oakar, President of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and apologized on behalf of his family and agreed to meet with representatives of the Arab-American community at an appropriate time in the future.”
Duh. The Dems are masters of PC behavior. They’re the PC party. That being said, it’s ridiculous to want an apology from the person not even involved in the statement. I so hate grievance theater. I thought Obama was going to eliminate all this bigotry!
Posted by: sigh | November 13, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
With Obama’s lack of experience and Emmanuel’s penchant for outbursts, and Biden’s gaffes, we’re in for a LONG four years.
I’d be laughing if the Dow wasn’t tanking. The Dow would never jump with Obama talking about increased taxes and all of that. Some folks might be swayed by slogans, but Wall Street isn’t. When you’re talking about people’s wealth, bumpersticker ideas are not going to cut it.
He’s in over his head. It’s Jimmah, all over again.
Posted by: JR | November 13, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Can you imagine if a Republican had uttered these words? It might have started WWIII. It was wrong and Rahm’s Dad (not Rahm) should have apologized. This has nothing to do with Rahm or Obama.
Posted by: Rose L Bethesda, MD | November 13, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Although I do not think Rep Rahm Emaunel should be held responsible for his father’s words, I disagree with the proposition that his father can say whatever he wants…when one makes a public statement to a news media outlet, one should be held accountable for what they say especially if it is racist and targets, denigrates, or smears an entire ethnic group who are also American. Arab-Americans are both highly respected in their professions and highly educated as well as are important contributors to our country. There should be no place for such statements spoken about any group.
Posted by: Jennifer J A | November 13, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I have to agree with the comment from MARC R. I think the mop comment was about his sons influence in the white house. Don’t get me wrong im sure dad has no love for arabs but that’s not what he was implying.
Posted by: ALAN | November 13, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
I think the mop comment was about his sons influence in the white house. Don’t get me wrong im sure dad has no love for arabs but that’s not what he was implying.
It’s obviously what he was implying. To suggest otherwise is to deny the plain meaning of the words. What was the “What is he, an Arab?” in there for if it had no relevance to the point Rahm’s father was making? Then it was a total non-sequitur, you’re saying?
Posted by: Kathy | November 13, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Great job Mary Rose and Kareem!
Keep up the good work!
Posted by: Lebaneezer | November 13, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
oh its only getting started kids…good times to come. Once the Obama draft is in its GO time./ Look at what you voted for…HAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: Suze | November 13, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Is this the “change” we need: another pro-Israel cheerleader/fundraiser in the White House?
Posted by: NoChange | November 13, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
The problem with such apologies–political apologies, that is–is that they rarely come from the heart. They are rarely imbued with meaning and substance that suggests we won’t see such rhetoric or behavior again.
When we receive political apologies we must see that there is some weight behind them–which is why Congress’ apology for slavery fell short, too, as it did not come with a demand for reparations.
But while Emanuel’s words are racist and disturbing, what I find more disturbing is his father’s participation in Irgun–a pre-state Jewish militia defined by the British as terrorist at the time–and his own participation in the Israeli army just a few years ago. These actions speak louder than words to me and demand repudiation as well. But more importantly, I think we need to see some evidence that neither these words nor these actions will be sanctioned by the Obama administration.
Posted by: Dr. Marcy Newman | November 14, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
c’mon now,… how can the christian fundamentalists get the ‘raputure’ and eventual ‘armageddon’ if America doesn’t support Israel?
Posted by: Blue | November 14, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
The comments by the father are disturbing and illustrate a fundamental racist attitude towards Arabs. Israel stands for apartheid and it is time for the U.S. taxpayer stop funding this racism. Democratic Neocons in the White House do not stand for “change.”
Posted by: Margaret J. | November 14, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Posted by: ‘Margaret J. ‘
‘Democratic Neocons in the White House do not stand for “change.”‘
Democratic Neocons?
uh oh… here we go again, inanely mixing political systems….
I was just getting relaxed not hearing the ‘socialist, marxist, fascist’ chant… but NOOoo,
there you go again…..
Posted by: Blue | November 14, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
What is saying is obviously just that Jews are pro-Israel; Arabs are not. A little simplistic but not racist.
Posted by: PJQ | November 14, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Rahm Emanuel’s father is free to say whatever he wants. Emanuel should not have to apologize, disavow or repudiate his father’s remarks. It’s like asking a son to go against, disrespect, and humiliate his father publicly.
If all ethnic groups are gonna be sensitive and overeact over any remarks, and demand politicians to disavow and repudiate demeaning, smearing comments made by politicians’ family members, I want Obama to apologize to all Hispanics of Mexican descent for running his ad calling Mexicans “Mexicanos estupidos!”
Posted by: Diana in California | November 14, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Did Obama apologize to our military personnel for accusing them of killing civilians and children in villages of Iraq? Obama would have to apologize everyday of his life for everything that was said and done against his opponents during election year 2008.
If we’re gonna live as Americans in our great nation, we need to stop being so sensitive, and treat and respect each other as Americans and not members of an ethnic group. Our allegiance should be to our great nation, our beautiful American flag, our democracy, our military, and forget about our differences be it party affiliation or religion.
We need to show more respect towards our parents. Rahm Emanuel is not responsible for his father’s remarks. You don’t go against family in public. Family is sacred, just as God and Country!
Posted by: Diana in California | November 14, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
I’m surprised that Rahm didn’t say, “I can no more disown him that Obama could disown his White Grandmother or the black community.”
Posted by: Bob | November 14, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
What people here appear to conveniently forget is that the staunch stance towards Israel, and the antagonism against the rest of the Middle East, would´ve remained unmutable with either Republican or Democrat at the helm. The major difference, in my opinion, comes that the Republicans are more quick to turn to military action, therefore if McCain had won it should’ve been of no surprise to anyone if a war against Syria-Iran begun even before finishing those in Iraq-Afghanistan. The Democrats on the other hand tend to make better use of diplomatic-economic pressures/incentives for whatever purpose they have.
However, as national politics work, the parties’ allegiance is first and foremost to “special interests” groups, be it the military-industrial complex, big pharma, trade unions, financial sectors, or AIPAC. So, by simply studying the main “donors” to the different campaigns we can establish the policies that a given government will take. And by the looks of Obama, I would say that surrounding himself with people of the Clinton term, is a way of repaying his debt to the Clintons, but also means a continuation of the Clinton Era. In this aspect, I don’t see any cessation of hostilities between Israel-the rest or vice versa in the near future. At least not till the day that the US stops nursing Israel as if it were a defenceless little lamb and the rest of the region a pack of rabid, hungry dire wolves, and frankly, Rahm’s credentials and appointment is a clear testament that as far as the Middle East goes, there will be nothing new under the sun.
Too bad, Obama truly had the opportunity to change the world and lead it to a new direction. But it looks like he chose to simply take a trip around the ol’ block.
Posted by: Wakanabe | November 14, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
If Mr. Rahm were Arab, his father thinks his influence might be anti-Israel. If Rahm were going to be mopping floors in the White House, his father thinks he might be uninfluential regarding foreign affairs. But because Rahm is Jewish and will be Chief of Staff, his father thinks he will have a pro-Israel influence. I don’t think Rahm’s father has expressed any opinion on the conditional probability of an Arab’s being a janitor.
Posted by: Kralizec | November 14, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am
A phony apology by Emmanuel or Obama for the politically motivated uncivilized comments made by the very person who instilled similar values in Emmanuel (his Dad)is nothing but a sham political cover-up to shield the anti-Arab, anti-Palestinian stand taken by Obama during his campaign. Obama famously said that he would not talk to Palestinian “terrorists” as if the terror unleased by the 51st State of US (Israel) on Palestinian or the democratic terror wars waged on the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan (and possibly India very soon) by the US is nothing to apologize about. Yes, Emannuel is anti-Arab by birth and upbringing and he has been Obama’s closest friends all these years, and he is the one who advises the incoming President of “Change”. I don’t see sny change when it comes to protecting the Israeli holocast and aparthied.
Posted by: KK | November 14, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
It’s obviously what he was implying. To suggest otherwise is to deny the plain meaning of the words. What was the “What is he, an Arab?” in there for if it had no relevance to the point Rahm’s father was making? Then it was a total non-sequitur, you’re saying?
Posted by: Kathy | Nov 13, 2008 9:11:11 PM
No the “what is he an arab” part has to do with pushing support for Israel. because an arab wouldnt .Get it? He said it badly but thats what i get from reading it a few times.
Posted by: ALAN | November 14, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
After reading some of the comments I think obamas in for a rough ride. He’s going to be to far left for most of the country. But not left enough for alot of his radical supporters. He’s stuck in the middle and nobody’s going to be happy. Kind of like the current congress.
Posted by: ALAN | November 14, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
For better or for worse if the parent of the CHIEF OF STAFF wishes to talk about the direction of US foreign policy to FOREIGN press he needs to be completely shut down.
Does he or does he not have the ear of the president? Does he speak for his son? Why is he speaking about US foreign policy to foreign press?
The elder Emanuel needs to be completely repudiated. A simple statement that he is not now and never will be authorized to speak for the administration or his son would begin the process.
Posted by: daniel | November 17, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I should make clear that this issue of mopping is a distraction from the question of why Rahm’s closest family is discussing his role in the white house with the foreign press.
Posted by: daniel | November 17, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Arabs account for over 95% of the Semitic people. Saying or doing something against them is anti-Semitism. Everyone should watch out for this fact. There is lots of anti-Semitism being directed against Arabs. Worse than that, it’s being encouraged by the media.
Posted by: Fred | November 19, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm