By Dotcomabc

Nov 15, 2008 1:01pm

Diocese Repudiates SC Priest Who Said Catholic Obama Supporters Need Penance Before Communion

Father Jay Scott Newman, pastor of St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville, SC, has told Catholics who voted for President-elect Obama that they need to seek penance before they take Communion, "lest they eat and drink their own condemnation," Newman wrote in a church newsletter, alluding to I Corinthians: "For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body [of the Lord] eats and drinks judgment on himself."

In a newsletter posted on the church website — but since taken down — Father Newman wrote that "Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation."

Via email the Greenville News interviewed Father Newman, who expressed chagrin at a recent poll indicating that fewer than 25% of American Catholics attend Mass every Sunday.

"Newman calls abortion the ‘chief battleground’ in the so-called culture wars, and different from ‘prudential’ matters such as health care, education or the war on terror," wrote the News. "A Catholic who gets an abortion, encourages one or assists in the procedure is automatically excommunicated from the church, Newman said, a penalty he said doesn’t apply to other forms of killing. ‘The reason is that abortion is usually murder in secret and it lays axe to human life at its root,’ he said. With nearly 50 million abortions since Roe v. Wade, Newman said Obama would seek to make ‘hidden murder’ a legally protected right, and anyone who voted to give him such power ‘will be complicit in the legal holocaust which will follow.’"

But in an unusual move, Monsignor Martin T. Laughlin, Administrator of the Diocese of Charleston, SC, has issued a statement and video repudiating Father Newman.

"This past week, the Catholic Church’s clear, moral teaching on the evil of abortion has been pulled into the partisan political arena," wrote Msgr. Laughlin. "The recent comments of Father Jay Scott Newman, pastor of St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville, S.C., have diverted the focus from the Church’s clear position against abortion. As Administrator of the Diocese of Charleston, let me state with clarity that Father Newman’s statements do not adequately reflect the Catholic Church’s teachings. Any comments or statements to the contrary are repudiated."

"The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, ‘Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions,’" Msgr. Laughlin continued. "The Catechism goes on to state: ‘In the formation of conscience the Word of God is the light for our path; we must assimilate it in faith and prayer and put it into practice. We must also examine our conscience before the Lord’s Cross. We are assisted by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, aided by the witness or advice of others and guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church.’ Christ gives us freedom to explore our own conscience and to make our own decisions while adhering to the law of God and the teachings of the faith. Therefore, if a person has formed his or her conscience well, he or she should not be denied Communion, nor be told to go to confession before receiving Communion.

"The pulpit is reserved for the Word of God. Sometimes God’s truth, as is the Church’s teaching on abortion, is unpopular. All Catholics must be aware of and follow the teachings of the Church. We should all come together to support the President-elect and all elected officials with a view to influencing policy in favor of the protection of the unborn child."

Newman has since taken down his church newsletter and is now referring those seeking to read it to the website of the Diocese of Charleston.

- jpt

User Comments

It would be a real travesty of justice if the IRS does not revoke the tax-free status of this church of Newman! It has been clearly demonstrated that he has been using the pulpit for political stance. Does he not understand the laws, or is he just dissing those who are good catholics but are not in total agreement with al of the church’s teachings because they do not consider families and the lives of everyday people? Do priests have any inkling of how ordinary people live? We do not live the lives of pampered priests who are adequately compensated and NEVER have to worry where their next meal is coming from, nor whether they will have a roof over their head?? Who are they to preach to us especially within our own bodies and within our own bedrooms. Newman ought to be sanctioned and churches must be made to pay taxes for all their interference in the politics of today.

Posted by: Karen | November 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

So is abortion sin or not? If it is, shouldn’t the person reflect on this before taking communion. I am not Catholic,and am looking for clarification.

Posted by: Kelly | November 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

The Neo-Conservative candidate had views that directly contradict Jesus on:
-the war
-torture
-the death penalty
-a whole host of economics that empower the empowered and disempower the disempowered
-health care
-poverty
-discrimination
-etc, etc
But because the Liberal candidate contradicts the Catholic reading of the Bible on one issue- ONE- that one thing overrides the laundry list of issues where Neo-Conservatives views are radically opposed to the teachings of Christ?
That is pure insanity. Neo-Conservatism is the most anti-Christian popular political ideology in American history.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | November 15, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I find the real travesty exists with the people who don’t practice what they preach.
If one claims to be an “ardent, practicing” Catholic, then one can’t just “cherry pick” Catholic Doctrine, and reject the parts one doesn’t agree with.
That’s called hypocrisy.
If you don’t agree with the Catholic Church (or any other church, synagogue, mosque… whatever!) on certain controversial issues, find another church, etc. which will suit your needs.
That’s called freedom of religion.

Posted by: Dogma | November 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

The priest in question has a serious problem, as noted by the other posters, and I hope he will apologize himself for saying something like he did. He does not own the communion, as his arrogance seems to suggest. While Obama supports abortion, McCain is no saint either and his views also contradict those of the Catholic Church (especially on war and the other issues noted below by another poster). Moreover, McCain had no problem and openly invited support from evangelical preachers who have said (and preached) abhorent things about Catholics.
Holding the country, or a community of believers, hostage to one issue is wrong. Thank goodness for the common sense and honesty of the Monsignor to take the Church out of the political arena.

Posted by: MIguy | November 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

In these hardening times perhaps it is better to be looking after each other more instead of trying to make war on each other’s beliefs. In the Bible’s Gospel of Matthew one may read this:
Lord, when was it that
We saw you hungry and gave you food?
We saw you thirsty and gave you something to drink?
We saw you a stranger and welcomed you?
We saw you sick and took care of you?
We saw you in prison and visited you?
‘Truly I tell you, just as you
did this to one of the least of
these who are members of my
family, you did it to me.’
– Matthew 25: 37-40

Posted by: Liz R | November 15, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Karen – you’re comments are absurd. Grow up and read some books for crying out loud. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
Kelly – abortion is a sin. The article (correctly) mentions that direct participation in an abortion earns the penalty of automatic excommunication.
ElodieStClair – you may be right about “neo-conservatives,” or you might be off base. It makes little difference though… we are talking about abortion here – which is a crime against humanity on a scale you fail to comprehend (as your ideaological ancestors failed to comprehend similar crimes against humanity… that I am sure YOU would now consider horrible without question.) Once you DO understand the seriousness of this issue, that list of other very important issues will look differently to you. All you have to do is engage your brain for a little while… and start asking questions the abortion industry doesn’t want you to ask.
Dogma – interesting point. Believing in Catholicism should be a minimum requirement for calling oneself a “Catholic.” Apparently words have less value and meaning than any time in history! I was born and raised here in the US – what’s to stop me from calling myself a citizen of Zaire? ;)

Posted by: Michael | November 15, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

One of the founding principals of this great country is
“FREEDOM OF RELIGION”!!!!
CATHOLICS NEED TO FIND A NEW CHURCH!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Curiously, even after repudiating the priest’s statement, the Monsignor did not alter the Church’s position:
“This past week, the Catholic Church’s clear, moral teaching on the evil of abortion has been pulled into the partisan political arena,” wrote Msgr. Laughlin. “The recent comments of Father Jay Scott Newman, pastor of St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville, S.C., have diverted the focus from the Church’s clear position against abortion…”
“…All Catholics must be aware of and follow the teachings of the Church. We should all come together to support the President-elect and all elected officials with a view to influencing policy in favor of the protection of the unborn child.”
Quite frankly, I don’t care what anyone does with their own body. It’s not MY concern (nor should it be), as long as YOU don’t violate MY rights as an American!

Posted by: Dogma | November 15, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

No wonder the catholic church is becoming increasingly irrelevant.

Posted by: dem in chicago | November 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Kelly,
I do not hold any position of authority in any church, but I wanted to weigh in on your concern.
The BEST answer, I feel, is written is in the story Christ told about the adulterous woman. “He who is without sin, cast the first stone”. John 8:7
That concept (principle) seems to be a part of what the Monsignor is eluding to.
We as humans, (even the clergy), cannot fully speak for God. We can only pray to know what is the right thing is to do.
All the great theologians and most of the faith community believe that abortion is sin, yet, there are innumerable sins that we do not try to legislate. Trying to legislate morality is complex at best, and hypocritical at its worst.
I respect the Catholic church, because they are pro-life in all regards, including the death penalty and war. The protestant churches, in general, have not been so consistent.
There is one thing I can say for sure, judgement and condemnation are sins too.
And yes, I do believe we must, reflect on all things, before during and after communion.
Another thing I respect about the Catholic church, they have reflected on their corporate sins, and have tried to correct them. (Anti Semitism, slave-trade, legalism, and most recently covering up pedophilia).
Which continues to beg the question, who among us is without sin?

Posted by: Complexities | November 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

MIguy – you are incorrect about the Priest’s problem. It’s not that serious! Ha ha! The fact is, he is probably correct in thinking that most Catholics who voted for Barack Obama are in trouble… the only leg they have to stand on is “invincible ignorance.” Which means their consciences weren’t properly formed (which is also a moral failure) so their culpability is lessened. But, if you are pro-choice – your conscience is muddied… it is as simple as that.
Where the Priest had an error was with authority within the context of Catholicism… though he was probably correct in his statements, he doesn’t have the authority as a simple Priest to make official statements that are PROBABLY true.
I don’t fault you for misunderstanding the issue here – or a lack of understanding about authority amongst the ordained clergy in the Church. Most people don’t get it – I have only a slightly better understanding than you (I imagine.) But you can read up on this stuff if you want – the Catechism is available online after all! ;)

Posted by: Michael | November 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

The rest of the World do not consider America a good Christain nation thus am surprised to see so much hypocrisy when it comes to Christainity. In America, Christainity has been reduced to support or non-support for abortion. It is really pathetic. If they are really serious, sex should be banned till you get married. What happened to the Ten commandments? I have never seen or known a Pro-abortionist. People abort for different reasons. Leave their judgement to God and stop mixing it with Politics. Am a Catholic, but am really disappointed. They should just spell it out, Obama is black, I dont support him. Everyone will understand but instead of spelling it out, they use different words to coin race. Marxist, Socialist, Arab, moslem, etc

Posted by: jayjay | November 15, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

The world is over populated and unable to feed the millions of people around the globe.
The Catholic Church lead in sexual abuse cases against children.
Parents are abandoning their children in Nebraska.
Furthermore, children are being abandon period by mother/father everyday, look at murder cases of children killed by one of their parent.
How many service men/women that are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan that killed enemies or civilians that are Catholics??
Taking anyone life is murder!!!!
I am PRO-CHOICE, had two abortions and would have to answer to JEHOVAH, MY GOD!!
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THIS WORLD WHO HAVE NOT SIN!!!!!
PEACE

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 15, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

“…We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness…”
Our Founding Fathers placed Life at the head of this list for reason. Without Life, there ARE no other rights!

Posted by: Dogma | November 15, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

THE PRIEST WAS RIGHT ABORTION IS MURDER THE 5TH COMMANDMENT THOU SHALL NOT KILL……………… THOSE CATHOLICS THAT VOTED PRO DEATH HAVE TO ADMIT THEIR SIN IN CONFESSION BEFORE COMMUNION. AND THE BISHOPS HAVE SAID SO………

Posted by: daniel | November 15, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I think that there needs to be a very clear, accurate, unambiguous, and loud statement made by the USCCB on this matter of conscience and voting for a pro-abortion candidate. I think that we are flirting with Relativism here which I believe the Pope has warned us about. Sadly, it seems to me that this whole thing is playing right into the hands of the media.

Posted by: John | November 15, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

The pulpit should be reserved for god’s word and not that of a wayward racist. If you want my opinion, I think the catholic church should removed the priest from the catholic order. He is simply practicing outward racism under the guise of the abortion issue.

Posted by: The One | November 15, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

70% of blacks in California were so conservative that they voted for Prop8.
Yet they had no problem voting for Obama
with his radical abortion views.
I just don’t get it.

Posted by: sam | November 15, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I am a strong Catholic and I do not believe in murder, however this priest is trying to play God and How dare him Judge the people that voted for Obama, I did and I know that I am not going to help because of my vote.
You wanted me to vote for Mac- well let me tell your- he wants USA to continue the war for the next 100 years. This is killing the young, the women all soliders. I am so glad He is not my priest and not in my parish.
Again, do not judge me or the Catholics, you are no better than MAC.
I love my church and I will always be a Catholic and continue receiving communion.

Posted by: demo in NM | November 15, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

The plain truth here it that all of this is between the person and God. If you believe in God, then you also believe that we’re ALL going to be judged by Him in the end. So act accordingly!
In the words of Jiminy Cricket: Let your conscience be your guide…

Posted by: Dogma | November 15, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I think Msgr. Laughlin took the wrong line on this issue. He ends up with a contradiction: you are free to follow your conscience, even if it means voting for someone who is pro-choice, but you must follow the word of God, which forbids direct abortion. What if a woman’s conscience, examined “befor the Lord’s cross,” tells her to have an abortion, because on balance this would be morally better, given that her child is expected to have Down Syndrome?
Should she follow her conscience or follow the Church?
What Msgr. Laughlin–and the Church as a whole–should say is this: as Catholics we take no position about whether abortion should be legal. Secular law is the realm of Caesar, the City of Man. We do take a position about the choice to have an abortion, however. Our position is this: do not have an abortion, even if secular law permits you to do so. You are free as a Catholic to vote for a candidate who is permissive on abortion, but you are not free, as a Catholic, to have an abortion yourself, or to perform a direct abortion on another person.

Posted by: Bill Helbing | November 15, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

As a Catholic, anyone who supports a candidate who supports abortion, especially the radical policies of Obama’s, is going against their religion.
Obama isn’t just a supporter of abortion, but has gone so far as to support abortion at any stage in pregnancy and pushed for young teenage girls to go across county lines to have abortions without their parents consent or knowledge.
This should not only be condemned by Catholics but all parents as well.

Posted by: S Adams | November 15, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

What did the church do on Iraq war which has claimed innocent lives. Why did the church keep quiet and watch people
die one after the other. Were these lives not valuable at all????? Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: FM | November 15, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

You wanted me to vote for Mac- well let me tell your- he wants USA to continue the war for the next 100 years. This is killing the young, the women all soliders. I am so glad He is not my priest and not in my parish.
+++++++++++++++++++++
This was proven to be false, McCain never said that the war should continue for 100 years. This was a lie the democrats put out there and the dems believed it.

Posted by: S Adams | November 15, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

FM–Saddam Hussien was guilty of atrocious acts on human life. He was found guilty and paid the price. The terrorists, mainly Al Qaeda, are at fault for the war we are in now. Was it the church’s fault that we were attacked on 9/11? Hypocrisy? I think not.
People forget that our military is a volunteer service. Every man and woman serving this country is there because it was their choice to defend this nation. They have done an excellent job and continue to do a great job. They are all heroes who deserve our support and not condemnation for what needed to be done for freedom and to secure a democratic country in the middle east. A democratic Iraq will serve us well in the war on terror. It gives us an ally. If we hadn;t have secured Iraq, Iran would have taken over and God knows what we would have faced.

Posted by: S Adams | November 15, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Fr Newman did not say he would REFUSE Holy Communion to Obama voters. He said Obama voters should understand that he will support abortion at all stages. He has already promised to sign the FOCA when it comes to his desk. The only way to prevent that now is to keep it from passing both houses of Congress. I don’t think even Obama is arrogant enough to pass this by executive order.

Posted by: rightjack58 | November 15, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

OK, the Church decided, from the Pope down to the US Council of Bishops on the parameters of “voting your conscience.” Paramount is that priests must never tell the people who or what party to vote for, because neither party has a firm grip on the full content of Catholic Teaching.
Neither Dems nor GOP are in full compliance of Church Teaching: Dems on abortion; GOP on the Death Penalty. Both are “right to life” issues. But so is the Catholic teaching on social justice issues. We are our brother’s keepers, including helping immigrants, legal or not; caring for the the poor via health care, housing, education, etc; and the common worker. For the past 100 + years, the Church has said these issues are just as important!
(And US law is one of separation of Church & State, and there is the IRS factor to consider too!)
The Church, is run by “human beings,” ergo, is fallible! The ONLY place the Pope, and he alone, is infallible is on Catholic DOGMA, or what stated is in our Nicene Creed! Priests are not infallible in any way!
And the ONLY reason NOT to receive Communion – is when we commit a “Mortal” sin, i.e. murder, beating a spouse, pedophelia, etc. Voting your conscience is not in this category! And this reception of the Eucharist is between God and the person, no one has the right to condemn another.

Posted by: Kathleen Vignolini | November 15, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

What did the church do on Iraq war which has claimed innocent lives. Why did the church keep quiet and watch people
die one after the other. Were these lives not valuable at all????? Hypocrisy!!!
Posted by: FM | Nov 15, 2008 3:49:27 PM
——————————-
The Catholic Church did. I guess you skipped mass that Sunday huh?

Posted by: Carol | November 15, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I thought Mr. Obama is Jesus Christ

Posted by: young_voter | November 15, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The church should lose its tax exepmt status, but dredging this one up must have taken some work. How big is the Dioscese? As I recall, SC is about 2% Catholic.

Posted by: Mara | November 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

as a catholic who unashamedly voted for obama, i am once again ashamed at the heirarchy of the catholic church… how dare they tell me who to vote for… they would rather us vote for an administration that would rape the earth in the name of corporate greed killing ALL of gods creation, instead of voting for a pro-choice candidate that would help save humanity and work towards eliminating abortion by eliminating the causes and reasons people chose it… i am wearing my obama shirt to church tomorrow!

Posted by: earthisnotflat | November 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The Catholic Church is one of the world’s largest sexist institutions. It is populated by men who will never know what it means to raise a child, keep a family together, pay a mortgage, worry about health care, find day care, pay tuition, or be concerned about a woman’s health or ability to raise a child.
American Catholics voted for Obama by 10%. Hopefully, this is an indication that they’re beginning to tell the Catholic Church to stay out of American politics.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 15, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

demo,
yes isn’t it interesting that people are different and their cultures are different, too? try to make some friends from outside of your comfort zone — you’d be amazed how interesting and odd people are.

Posted by: to demo | November 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Since large numbers of catholics voted for Obama, it is clear that the catholic church is loosing moral ground and needs to reform and go with the flow rather than be out of touch and leave the religion and state separate.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 15, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

The United States is not a theocracy. Period.

Posted by: Tom J | November 15, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

bishop martino of the scranton diocese had the pastor of every church in the entire diocese (this is a hundred or so churches) read a letter he wrote trying to guilt people into voting for the pro-life candidate… this was a literal endorsement of mccain… people here are livid… this bishop also is closing churches left and right and closed a number of catholic schools… to say he is unpopular is an understatement… but his worst crime has been his refusal to allow the teachers of the catholic churches her to form a union… one of the worst bishops we’ve ever had… but he is supported by the heirarchy of the catholic church… no wonder religion is floundering

Posted by: earthisnotflat | November 15, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Now, I understand why Bill Maher’s documentary “RELIGULOUS” is so popular!!

Posted by: dmac1 | November 15, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Jake, could please report to us where is Obama’s change in action? Could you keep reminding him the promises he made to us?
His choice of Rahm Emanuel is not a change , specially when I saw this report:
How Rahm Emanuel Earned $16 Million
Barack Obama’s new chief of staff spent two years working as an investment banker in Chicago. Wassterstein Perella paid Rahm Emanuel $16.2 million and made him a managing director, despite the fact that Emanuel had never held a job outside of politics before. So what did he do to earn that kind of pay day?

Posted by: Frieda | November 15, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

For 8 years the neocons and theocons used the LIFE issue to divide. Those two groups have no real interest in banning abortion, never have and never will. A woman’s right to choose is the law of the land.
The sanctioning of this over-stepping Priest by the Church is the proper measure. Debate the issue in terms of sin and law, in this issue they are a distinction with a difference.

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | November 15, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Another big news story of year concerned the ecumenical council in Rome, known as Vatican II. Among the things they did in an attempt to make the church more “commercial” was to introduce the vernacular into portions of the mass, to replace Latin, and to widen somewhat the range of music permissible in the liturgy, but I feel that if they really want to sell the product, in this secular age, what they ought to do is to redo some of the liturgical music in popular song forms.

Posted by: Tom Lehrer | November 15, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

We did not elect Catholic bishops or the Pope to represent us. Our Founders created a secular nation, not a theocracy, for a good reason. For over a thousand years, the Catholic Church enslaved the Western World. It wrote the book on torture, ‘ethnic cleansing’ and child abuse, and it helped inspire Hitler’s genocide. For the Church to lecture Obama on the sanctity of life is like OJ Simpson condemning wife-abuse. My message to the Catholic Church: Keep your filthy hands off of our children and away from our Constitution!

Posted by: comtek | November 15, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Simply why I, and millions of other Catholics, no longer are ‘practicing’ but rather are ‘recovering’

Posted by: Rod McKim | November 15, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

——————————-
Posted by: Rod McKim | Nov 15, 2008 5:46:03 PM
Simply why I, and millions of other Catholics, no longer are ‘practicing’ but rather are ‘recovering’
——————————-
I couldn’t have said it better myself!!

Posted by: Dogma | November 15, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

The priest is correct and the monsignor is a coward. The church was not instituted by Christ to make life easier on earth or conform to “the lives of everyday people.” In fact, Christ specifically says to pick up your cross and follow Him. It’s hard to live the life of a Christian. It’s hard to love people you want to hate, and it’s hard to speak up when you are ridiculed and told to be silent. But, we will not be silenced, and we will continue to vote our consciences.

Posted by: Nola | November 15, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Nola – do you have a cross in your garage that you literally carry around? do you take ‘gods word’ at face value only when it makes sense to you or do you use some phrasiology as a guide and some for literal facts?.. how do you decide this?… see how hypocritical the dogma is?

Posted by: earthisnotflat | November 15, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

These Right wing religious zealots make me sick.
This their holier than thou judgement of other people’s spiritual thinking is scary.
How different is Fr. Newman from Mullah Omar?
Boy, thank God for America.
If the Republican party allows these zealots to take over, the party is finished.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | November 15, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

The Catholic Church needs more priests like Father Jay Scott Newman who is not afraid of speaking up no matter how uncomfortable it is for some so called “Catholics” to hear the truth. Father Newman is following on what Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict have been preaching.
I won’t critize Msgr. Laughlin, but my opinion is that he took a more political correct stand.
The majority of practicing Catholics supported and voted for the pro-life candidates, and ban on same-sex marriage because of their religious convictions. We practicing Catholics fully understand the Church’s Catechism and doctrines, and we don’t question the Church’s authority.
For those who proclaim to be “Catholics” who support pro-choice candidates, abortions and same-sex marriage, I think you’re just trying to pass as Catholics to discredit and disgrace our Church. Just like those priests who molested children, they joined the Church to hide their homosexuality, and commit their crimes. Those priests (like Father Phleger) were/are the devil in disguise trying to bring discredit and disgrace to destroy the Catholic Church and so many other churches. Just like St. Michael’s Prayer reads, “Satan and all the other evil spirits who roam throughout the world seeking the ruin of Souls.” Churches are the best place for Satan and his evil spirits to infiltrate to bring down and try to destroy them.

Posted by: Diana in California | November 15, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Nola,
It’s interesting that your “conscience” condones illegal war, torture of human beings, the death penalty, economics that favor the empowered and disfavor the disempowered, discrimination, and the ravaging of God’s environment. Are you 100% sure that Jesus would support this laundry list of Neo-Conservative views?
Are you sure?
It is inarguable that liberal views are far more aligned with the views of Christ than are conservative views.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | November 15, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

The Catholic church is powerful because of its assets but its as crooked as you can get. how anyone take that so called religion seriously is beyond me..Read your own Bible and develop a relation with God..you don’t need a church and a crooked one at that to have a relationship with God..

Posted by: Stanley | November 15, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

To sisterdearest09 / Nov 15, 2008 1:18:24 PM
Is that how you justify your actions? I bet you were against and hated Gov. Sarah Palin because of her strong moral and religious convictions, and her decision not to abort her down syndrome son Trig. Gov. Palin being a walking pro-life example reminded all pro-choice women of their abortions. That’s why they were so against her.

Posted by: Diana in California | November 15, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

THIS IS A VERY GOOD EXAMPLE WHY THERE IS A SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.
THE DOOR SWINGS BOTH WAYS.IF YOU AGREE WITH THIS GUY SO BE IT —IF NOT LEAVE HIS CHURCH.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

None of this really matters. Once Barack Hussein Obama consolidates His power, we’ll all be forced to worship Him!

Posted by: Cult Of Personality | November 15, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

I GUESS IF SATAN IS PRO LIFE HE IS WHAT YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR–WHY IS SOMEONE ALWAYS INTO ANOTHERS BUSINESS—-IF YOU ARE TO WEAK TO MAKE YOUR OWN DECISIONS I GUESS SOME OLD GESER WILL DO IT FOR YOU—IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHO YOU VOTE FOR–WORK ON YOUR OWN CLOSETS–TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS,BUT NEVER THINK YOU SHOULD MAKE ANOTHERS DECISION.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Jesus also said to ‘give to caesar what is caesar’s and give to God what is God’s’. Yes, literally, He was referring to taxation but He was also giving a lesson (in my humble opinion) on separating Church and State. If one believes that life begins at conception then one must conclude that abortion is an abomination and I can accept using this as the most guiding issue when selecting a candidate. However, there is nowhere in the Bible where this is stated and the concept is infered as an extension to the sacredness of life and the commandment to not kill. Also, if one accepts that life begins at conception then one must also accept that 50% of all natural conceptions miscarry naturally. Does God truly intend for this to occur? If you smoke or drink alcholol during your pregnancy is your soul then morally culpable for a birth defect in your child? Such that you shouldn’t take communion?
On the other hand, my assumption is that Jesus cares as much for the born as the unborn. A candidate who is a threat to the born is also unacceptable. So, in the end, neither Obama nor McCain are murderers but their actions (by commission or omission) will unfortunately lead to deaths. To say that one is better in the eyes of Jesus or the Catholic Church is out-of-bounds for the Priest in question in regards to denying Communion, Church teaching notwithstanding. Now if the Pope were to say it, as a matter of faith invoking infallibility, then it becomes more of an interesting discussion. But, my guess is he will leave to God what is God’s and we will all pray for a day when abortion does not exist.

Posted by: MIguy | November 15, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

ElodieStClair, you are right on the money! I could not have said it better..Jesus was a liberal because he loved everyone regardless of race, and he was concerned about the poor and downtrodden and yes he believed in spreading the ‘wealth around’ so everyone benefit..So called conservatives are a bunch of selfish people..”they want to take away my money” and give it to the poor!”..Puhleeze! become a liberal..your blood pressure will go down as you give love and get love in return..I am a proud liberal..I want everyone to be happy..that way we will have peace in our country..forexample..healthcare is a privilege(conservative) in this country and not a right(liberal). We liberals believe that every US citizen should recieve quality healthcare..healthcare ought to be a right.

Posted by: Stanley | November 15, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

As a cradle Catholic I fault the USCCB for not clearly and loudly speaking out exactly what the Church’s teaching is anent abortion. And urging their priests to do so early and frequenly throughout the election process. There was no need to cite candidate’s names, merely to ask Catholics to study what each one has said, and how they have acted on this issue. It’s both interesting and curious how many extraneous issues have been raised by commenters on this story. They seem to forget the essential fact: abortion of innocent human beings is murder. It’s a plain fact hidden from view given that more occur daily than lost their lives on 9/11. Now that the most pro-abortion candidate ever to run for the country’s top office has won, it’ll be infinitely harder not to have this evil become even more prevalent. And his effect on The SCOTUS will be even more disastrous for this issue.

Posted by: Johnny D | November 15, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO—(PRO CHOICE)YOUR DECISION .

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

For those people who say that the Catholic Church is irrelevent and losing believers, don’t you remember that in April of this year Pope Benedict came to the U.S. and the way he was received by President Bush, people of all walks of life, faiths, ethnic groups, rich and poor, powerful politicians?
Remember how the entire world mourned when Pope John Paul II died, how the Catholic Church led us during those grieving days, and how news of a new Pope was received. No other religious, royalty, or political leader in this earthly world is loved or brings the excitement like the Holy Pope! To us practicing Catholics, the Holy Pope is the most important leader in the world!

Posted by: Diana in California | November 15, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

THERE WOULD BE NO PURPOSE IN LIVING IF SOMEONE ELSE WERE TO TELL YOU YOUR EVERY MOVE—–DO WHAT YOU THINK IS RIGHT –THIS IS WHAT LEARNING IS ALL ABOUT—OH I FORGOT THERE ARE THOSE AMOUNG US THAT HAVE NO SINS—-WHAT A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Pro-life? If Reverend Newman is really “pro-life,” where’s his outrage over John McCain’s killing of women and children in his many bombing runs over Vietnam? Did Jesus say it’s okay because they’re brown? If the state tells you to kill, is that Christian? Are the lives of the already-born any less sacred? What slimy hypocrisy, Reverend Newman. You should ask your parishoners’ forgiveness!

Posted by: Donna H. | November 15, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Rodney: it does not seem like you believe it, but some people geniunely and deeply believe that abortion is murder. For a moment, consider the possiblitiy that they are correct. Giving others a “choice” about murder is then a pretty flimsy argument as we do not allow that as a society.
Personally, I am not so wise as to know when life begins. But I do not care to insult those who believe it starts at conception, because I have no way of saying it doesn’t.

Posted by: MIguy | November 15, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

DONNA H
THAT IS ONE I DONT WANT TO GET STARTED ON—-HOW ONE LIFE IS SUPPOSIDLY WORTH MORE THAN ANOTHER.
SOCIETY SEEMS TO BE A LITTLE SICK AT TIMES.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

MIGUY
THAT IS WHY WE LEAVE IT TO A HIGHER POWER.however it seems to be ok with the thousands of children that die every day due to starvation ,neglect etc—these people want to say what is right or wrong as long as it does not cost them anything.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

I agree that there are other issues important to Catholics besides abortion.

Posted by: MIguy | November 15, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

leave it pro choice and deal with your own hell afterwards if that is how it is
i am not pro abortion or pro life i do not reach that pay scale–if you know what i mean.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

more guilt from the catholic church…

Posted by: earthisnotflat | November 15, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Isn’t it great that we live in a nation where we are free to vehemently question, nay, attack, each others deeply-held beliefs and values, without any fear of retribution?

Posted by: Simon Says | November 15, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

like i sain it is those who think they are qualified to judge others—-freaking hypocrites

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I am catholic and voted for Obama. I think there are many issues to consider not just abortion. Priests are just men. They lost my respect when so many were exposed as paedophiles. What I do is between god and myself. These priests have no say anymore.

Posted by: annie | November 15, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

for those who say they are proud of what the father said…
maybe you can pay his salary or the taxes they will have to pay…
since we are finally stepping over the line and you don’t get to have tax free status AND threaten people with damnation for voting one way…
in this nation anyway.

Posted by: dl | November 15, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

What is it with Catholics and abortion? Or other anti-choice religions? If they believe that abortion is murder, why do the make such an issue of just one type of killing?
And why aren’t they doing anything to improve the living hell that is the life of so many children outside the womb? I guess feti are special.
Don’t like abortion? Then don’t have one.

Posted by: Alex | November 15, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

dont condem the churches as we need them desperately—it is the people that think they own you that you have to be concerned with..the church needs to spread the word —but the decisions are our own…most women who have abortions do suffer afterwards with mental issues—-we all have some understanding of right and wrong.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

TO “Ignorant People Sicken Me”:
Why does everything ALWAYS come down to race?
GET OVER IT ALREADY!!!
We ALL belong to the smallest minority of all: THE INDIVIDUAL!!
Is that too difficult a concept to grasp?

Posted by: Too Bad Ignorance Isn't Painful | November 15, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Actually the Church is very clear about abortion. It weighs abortion above all other killing including war and the death penalty

Posted by: Carl | November 15, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

carl
i would think that the unborn are the absolute innocent.

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Absolutely!

Posted by: Too Bad Ignorance Isn't Painful | November 15, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

abortion is a very painfull issue ,but this is what freedom is all about—.
goodnight

Posted by: rodney | November 15, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The right for a woman to choose is a freedom that was fought for. and what if abortion is over turned, Do you think that’s going to stop abortion I think not. Backroom and Backalley abortion will reemerge and the heath risk to females will increase . Women will travel to Canda or Mexico to get one. So this whole idea of overturning it is pointless weather you agree or disagree.Women will always get Abortion.

Posted by: KWOLF443 | November 15, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

I read the word “sin” and “penance” in the statement from this priest as if they are meaningful words. There is no religion in existence that has the right to take away the rights of women to control our bodies. Those days have long since passed, and we are no longer define ourselves by male-based religion or stupid rules that attempt to control us. In the words of Edie Brickell…religion is a smile on a dog. Meaningless.
The catholic church is obsolete, and those who cannot get pregnant have no business attempting to make rules around pregnancy. If they don’t want abortions to take place anymore, then they can consistently wrap it up. Enough is enough.

Posted by: suzanne | November 15, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

As a Catholic I would never personally condone an abortion, and would never even think twice about having one. However, I also believe that one of the strengths of America is the freedom of belief and speech. There are others in this country whose belief does allow abortion no matter what I think. I would do my best to convince them otherwise but in the end it is their decision if they think that life does not begin at conception. And I think that people should keep in mind that Obama and many Democrats are not pro-Abortion, rather they are just pro-choice in letting citizens make up their own mind…instead of having the Government dictate actions.

Posted by: Ordermonger | November 15, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

When will some people ever get it. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion.

Posted by: Liz | November 15, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

People will answer for their actions.

Posted by: jamesferrel | November 15, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

To Bad writes, “Why does everything ALWAYS come down to race? GET OVER IT ALREADY!!!”
==============================
It is without a doubt, TRULY ignorant to PRETEND that the root of such ignorance isn’t racism. You see, RACISM is the reason why COMMON SENSE doesn’t prevail. RACISM is the reason why only an ignorant White person would fail to put (2) and (2) together. Tell me something. For almost two years we’ve heard people talking about Rev. Wright and 20 years of hate filled sermons. Where are the other 1,039 sermons sprewing so-called racist hate? Racism is preventing them from asking LOGICAL questions. Racism is the reason why they are so EASILY led with simple catch phrases.
To Bad writes, “We ALL belong to the smallest minority of all: THE INDIVIDUAL!! Is that too difficult a concept to grasp?’
================================
Semantics. The fact of the matter is RACISM is alive and well. It’s not rooted in anything remotely tangible; just IGNORANCE.

Posted by: Ignorant People Sicken Me | November 15, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

We finally got a Catholic Priest willing to stand up to politicians with the message of life and Christ and the Catholic Church beats him down.
Good for Him! God Bless Him.

Posted by: Kara | November 15, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Newman is a disgracegul spiritual bully and thug…Msgr. Laughlin is a national treasure…

Posted by: Paul Timmons | November 15, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Good for this priest sticking up for innocent helpless babies. The safest place in the world,for a baby, should be it’s mother’s womb. We NEED to stop these killings!!!!

Posted by: Anna | November 15, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Diana in California,
No sane person hates Sarah Palin. It was just that she looked like a supreme hypocrite spouting God AND , guns, socialism, Marxism, terrorism, associations, associations, associations, real America, fake America, I was for it, I was against it, I sold planes, I built brideges, I read everything, I have “real responsibilities”, I don’t blink, I’ve been to Ireland and Iraq, I only ask for diet pepsi (coke, dr, pepper), the media is fair, the media is elite, the media is biased, the media is my best friend, I’m a feminist, I’m not a feminist, I am a feminist, (my particular favorite) the opponent is naive, winking and noding and at the same time decrying sexism, the clothes belong to them, yet they have to send laywers to pick them up…
What’s not to like?

Posted by: A Friend | November 15, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

First of all, the notion that “life begins at conception” is a misconception…! Life is a continuum, having begun about 3-billion years ago. Each one of us is a branch on the tree of life that has been progressing and evolving uninterrupted since it first began. Life is a process, and conception is merely a point in that process. To terminate a pregnancy in the early stages is morally equivalent to stepping on a snail. Secondly, a woman’s body (and all that is part of it) is her domain, and hers alone. Forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term against her will is as immoral as forcing her to have an abortion. A woman’s reproductive rights are more sacred than the contrived “rights” of any blob of protoplasm growing within her! As a man, I would be outraged if the government told me I had to father a child against my will. Forcing unwanted births on a woman (and on society) is the height of totalitarianism and immorality. On questions of morality, the Cahtolic Church has no credibilty, as they fostered the butchery of millions of people for centuries…!

Posted by: comtek | November 15, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Father Newman misinterpreted Church doctrine. One would only need to seek penance for voting for Obama IF one chose to vote for him based on his pro-choice stance alone. He was reprimanded, it appears, for his misleading statements. I am disappointed in those who make the leap from Father Newman’s wrong-headed views to disparage the entire Catholic church. Do bear in mind that Church doctrine is that life begins at conception, and therefore it makes perfect sense that the Church would oppose any efforts to sanction the termination of what the Church considers a living human being. Even if you do not agree with the Church’s stance, and I do not, you should respect that it is a stance based upon sincere religious belief and a consistent interpretation of their understanding of when life begins.

Posted by: moderate | November 15, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Father Jay Scott Newman cannot make church law. He does not rule any Catholics, and would never be my priest.

Posted by: paintpaintpaint | November 15, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Sex before marriage is a sin.

Posted by: pefros | November 15, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

I guess there are a lot of sinners then.

Posted by: d | November 15, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

I believe that the Catholic church forgets who is their Boss- I am Catholic but I would never make anyone feel less than and neither did Christ-
It is about God first, others 2nd and me last-It is about what I can do to help others- someone is missing the boat and frankly this Father should be removed for a period of time from his church and reflect in prayer and meditation to set his wrong to right-

Posted by: Sophia Beck | November 15, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I commend Father Jay Scott Newman.
Standing up for Truth is what he has done. I agree if you voted for Obama as a Catholic I think you have made a grave decision to do so …IF you knew his ProChoice stance. It is the defining issue ..it was clear cut.
Jesus said we would be persecuted as he if we did not live by the world….more
so now than ever…..its evil to look good and good to look evil…thru the worlds eyes.
God Bless you Father!

Posted by: Thomas | November 15, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Why don’t we let churches make a choice? Either keep politics out of religion and you can be tax-exempt..or you can talk politics all you want but lose the tax-exempt status. Make a choice..

Posted by: RO | November 16, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Ya, Obama is terrible on abortion, especially considering his practical endorsement of Partial Birth Abortions. That procedure is pretty much evil the way I see it. Of course McCain wanted to bomb Persians. Let the culture of death continue!!!

Posted by: Huh | November 16, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

why should church doctrine trump civil law in a secular society like the U.S.?
if there is freedom to worship, as well as freedom from imposed state religion and freedom to have no religion at all…. why is the church involving itself in political matters?
if any church wants to be ‘political, that’s fine, but their ‘tax exempt’ status should be forfeit.
you can’t have it both ways…..
If your ‘faith’ and religious doctrine can’t stand on it’s own and convince people to adhere to your dogma in the church, don’t foist your ‘morals’ on anyone else…….

Posted by: dewde | November 16, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

This is very dangerous territory when churches brainwash their followers to vote for a political candidate based on a single issue. I guess it’s OK to have a murderer for a president as long as they have an non-prochoice view. Also, doesn’t this affect the 501c3 status of this church – when will they be closed down for breaking the law?

Posted by: T | November 16, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

then there’s that symbolic vampire and cannibalism thing the church does..
blood/wine… wafer/body thang…
drink my blood and eat my body… CREEPY !

Posted by: dewde | November 16, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

newman should be defrocked and tossed out of the clergy. if a person believes and has faith in god, what the person does, or does not do, good or evil, is between the person and their god. would think that only a person’s god can judge them when it comes to their god’s laws and no one else, not the pope, not newman as far as catholics are concerned. tired of these catholic clergy nut jobs, tired of catholics in general. they defend pro-life but are silent on same sex marrige, on their clergy’s pedophiles, sex offenders, criminals. bogus, are catholics.

Posted by: Lawrence | November 16, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

dewde -
Obama brainwashed Americans to vote for him. He purposely used all the classic techniques, High tense and constantly.
————-

Posted by: seah | November 16, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

if obama brainwashed american into voting for him.
what did bush do?
lulled the whole nation to sleep under the mantra of
“you are unpatriotic if you say i should not invade iraq”
bush has ruined this country and guess what, there are so many people brainwashed by the rep. mess,
they wanted to give them another four years.
now that is a good job of brainwashing right there.
bush brainwashed the american people
in everything, until we are waking up with no roof over our heads, no money in the bank, and no jobs.
now bush is the real brainwasher.

Posted by: W | November 16, 2008, 5:47 am 5:47 am

bush even brainwashed john mccain into thinking he could win the presidency doing things just the way bush did.
and believe it or not,
they almost got away with it.
what 48% of the american people saying,
“take it all-we don’t care if we don’t have jobs, or homes, or money in the bank”
“We know you don’t want us to ask questions, we will not ask questions”
“does bin laden still have a good seat in the mountains-to watch our sons and daughters die?”
“if so, no only do i not have a house anymore, or money, or job, but please, send my son and my daughter to fight in iraq,and iran also,”
we are the real american, the real patriots,
take all we have, we don’t care if you lie to us, just do what you want to do”
that lying bush has so many people brainwashed, they don’t know what is right anymore.

Posted by: W | November 16, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am

and until the catholic church, cleans up that mess they have going on undercover, with the priest and the little boys,
the catholic church needs to be quiet.
all i ever what them to volunteer to step forward to make comment on about anything, is come out once per month, and count down the pedifiles they are expelling from the church, and pressing charges against them,
The day the catholic church is no longer covering up for dirty priest, or paying off ruined life boys.
is the day i might start to respect them again.
they need to do a clean sweep of their priest. pedi. and racist.
some of their priest have things ALL mixed up.

Posted by: W | November 16, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am

Repudiation is not enough.

Posted by: Yankee | November 16, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am

The Bishop in this case directly contravened Christ’s commands and the priest correctly followed Him: ‘He who condones the wicked, he who condemns the just are both an abomination to the Lord…and as far as the Obama voters are concerned, they have supported all four of the sins that Holy Scriptures tells us cry to heaven for vengeance: Abortion (murder, Sodomy, Oppression of the poor especially that of widows and orphans and defrauding workers of their wages…also known as the great satanic sins…you simply can’t get more ‘evil’ than that…and the Bishop’s utterly ridiculous idea that we need to all ‘come together’ at this point is also contravened by Sacred Scripture: ‘What fellowship does light have with darkness?’. Apparently plenty according to the Bishop. God, himself, however forbids this speaking thus to satan: (Genesis 3:15): ‘I will put emnities (hatreds) between you and the woman, between her seed and your seed’. So…come together? Wrong..pray for them…and for our country…and for this seriously in error Bishop…

Posted by: Mike | November 16, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Obama said the first thing he would do as President is to make sure abortion (under any circumstances, at any time, even killing infant surviving abortion) is secured regardless of states laws etc.
This means “intrinsic evil” is front and center of his agenda.
Helping to put him in office is “supporting/aiding/abetting”.
The priest is right!!!
The Bishop is a wimp….
I am a convert to Catholicism who became a Catholic because of its consistency.
Perhaps I should rethink my conversion!!
Start a NEW religion or perhaps Catholic church will go the way of the Anglican church and schism and schism and schism.

Posted by: Sheila A. | November 16, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am

I guess this comes down to the definition of “murder”. The bible does not specifically denounce abortion, but murder and the church has chosen to include abortion in that. And yet God himself never spoke against the killing during war by soldiers it ,in my view, is justified killing. Therefore, when others choose to interpret abortion in cases of incest or rape as Obama does as justifiable and hence acceptable, isin’t it just the same as the church has done in their interpretation.
Furthermore, John Mccain cheated on his first wife. just out of curiosity, what is the church’s position on divorce? It seems to me father Newman is saying one sin is greater than the other, which is not what the bible says at all. He is saying Obama’s ‘sins’ are worse than Mccain’s such that those whovoted for him need forgiveness which they would not have needed had Mccain been elected, right!!!
Plus, if you want to argue the merits then that is one thing. Just do not misrepresent Obama’s views on partial birth abortion to try and demonise the man. I believe lying is a sin too.

Posted by: Taff | November 16, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am

Of course the priest was correct. The Monsignor ought to check his moral theology text book before making such inane comments. The nonsense about the pulpit being for “the Word of God” implies that the Word of God can be separated from our personal and political decisions. Baloney! More “separation of church and state crappola.
Voting for a man whose moral positions are 100% contrary to the Church’s traditional positions is material support of evil…period. The fact that he said we ought to “support the president-elect…” certainly betrays his political leanings.

Posted by: Scott | November 16, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Diana in California -
Palin’s gender and reproductive decisions have nothing to do with my view of her. She’s an ill-informed, deceitful, hate-mongering demagogue.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 16, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

when given the right to choose—pro choice—DO NOT BLAME ANYONE BUT YOURSELF IF YOU MAKE THE WRONG CHOICE —PERIOD—–

Posted by: rodney | November 16, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

as for a priest telling people how to vote based on his views—-i think he is way out of line—he may express his views concerning himself—but others have to make their own decision —-WITHOUT SOME KIND OF GUILT ATTACHED.AND IF HE HIMSELF THINKS HE IS WITHOUT SIN,HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A HYPOCRITE.

Posted by: rodney | November 16, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

“material cooperation with intrinsic evil”…now here’s a topic the church understands on the most intimate level. I wonder if there are any other “hidden” crimes where they might take a similar stance? Does hush-hush reassignment as a substitute for punitive action constitute “material cooperation”? Maybe they should bring back indulgences and all the Obama supporters could just kick in a couple extra bucks to offset their “sin”. What a proud history this church has! I know some wonderful people who are catholic. Too bad they are so poorly represented by their clergymen.

Posted by: Hokie Freak | November 16, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

I REMEMBER THE CHURCH BEING AGAINST BIRTH CONTROLL—-WONDER WHAT THIS GUYS STANCE IS ON THAT ISSUE.—ABSTANANCE WE ALL KNOW HOW THAT WORKS—NOT

Posted by: rodney | November 16, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

One can only hope that the rantings of this sociopathic fascist nutcase will further educate Catholics on the autocratic insanity of the Catholic church.
Perhaps a huge uprising of Catholics telling the Pope and his minions to, well, go to Hell with their anti-birth control, their anti-women’s freedom, their pro-pedophilia, their silly “Papal Infallibility” (invented by Pio Nono to grant himself absolute power) will truly transform the Catholic church into a catholic church.
Thanks, Father Newman, for exposing yourself in public.

Posted by: Brez | November 16, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

brez,
i pray what you have commented will happen SOON!

Posted by: W | November 16, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

I think the priest is right. Obama said the first thing he would do is sign FOCA which would repeal all state restrictions on abortion including parental notification; thus making the killing of the innocent a right to all women. If you are a Catholic, then you should have known better than to vote for someone who is so hostile towards the innocent and defenseless. One who understands the sanctity of life knows that abortions stops a defenseless beating human heart, a tiny human heart. For the Msgr. to undo the stand the priest took is an act of cowardice and is quite shameful.

Posted by: jerry | November 16, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Being against birth-conrol and abortion have always been the doctrine of the Catholic Church, if you don’t accept them, no one is forcing you to go to church there. No matter how others want to change those policies, it’s never, ever going to happen.

Posted by: Ben Padilla | November 16, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Although I am certain that I will be vilified for writing this, Fr Newman is right and the Monsignor is wrong. Terribly wrong. Catholics and indeed all people, do not have the right to just follow their consciences. Their consciences must be rightly formed. People constantly confuse their emotions and desires with their consciences. We live in a day when sex has been elevated to the level of a sacrament. Abortion is considered harmless. Thank God that we still have a few F Newmans left. The nutcases out there ranting against the Church are pathetic. May God have mercy on their souls.

Posted by: Marc | November 16, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

The church again has shown how 2 faced it is. On one side of its mouth it talks about how bad abortion is and secondly, disproves somebody who teaches that. No wonder people quit going to Catholic churches.

Posted by: Rich | November 16, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

PERFECT PEOPLE IN A PERFECT CHURCH—-DONT BE HYPOCRITES—–IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.

Posted by: rodney | November 16, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

What kind of double speak is the Monsignor putting out in this statement? I have never heard such a confusing statement on the subject. Again, it is an instance of political correctness run amouk. Have the Obamanites gotten to the Monsignor? I seriously wonder if the Pope supports the Monsignor on such a wishywashy, say nothing position on this important topic.

Posted by: Peder A | November 16, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Wow! A priest defends the position of the church and gets slammed by the Church for doing it. Guess the Catholic Church in the U.S. is finished. Better yet are the folks that demand separation of Church and state then want the IRS to control the church. What hypocrites!

Posted by: Phen Kirk | November 16, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The Catholic Church has been infected by liberalism which a top psychiatrist has reported was a bonafide mental disorder. Why would somebody give up their personal responsibility to a governing body to tell you what to do?
I hope the Catholic Church dies soon or has a revival and denounces liberalism. I say fire most of the bishops first. They should send up a signal flare.

Posted by: Rich | November 16, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

They can’t put that toothpaste back in the tube.

Posted by: Atheist Insurgency | November 16, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Funny, Seems the Catholic Church had no problem when a New Orleans Bishop excommunicted at least 2 individuals in the early 60′s for opposing integration.
Kill babies in the womb, and well the positon of many bishops is to discuss it. When will the bishops become men of action.

Posted by: BryanB | November 16, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

If a candidate is a segregationist but is “right” on the other issues, is it OK to vote for him? Need a priest be coy when talking about racists? If unborn babies are, well, babies, maybe killing them is even worse than racism.

Posted by: JJ | November 16, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Fr. Scott Newman, like other old Southern Segregationists and heirs to that legacy are just trying to throw sand in our eyes. Otherwise, they’d wouldn’t give communion to people who vote for politicians who support the Death Penalty.
He and his conservative Catholic Bishop supporters apparently think abortion is more sexy than the death penalty. After all they know a lot about sex – especially involving priests and young boys, and then covering up the crimes.
They’re just trying to deflect attention away from their own sins and win back Catholics who defected to evangelical sects.
Recall that Jesus asked God the Father to forgive his persecutors, “for they know not what they do.” Newman and certain conservative Catholic bishops, however, know exactly what they do.
Now is time for their public penance.

Posted by: Chester | November 16, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Again, a church leader strays – or picks and chooses which part of Catholic doctrine to elevate for the masses to see.
The Priest is correct. CCC 2270-2275.
There is also the Bishop’s 2007 document – Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility- which cautions Catholics before putting anything – to include you pocketbook – before the mandate to protect human life, which starts AT CONCEPTION.
If you’re unfamiliar with the Doctrine that is steering this dilemma, I pray that you familiarize yourselves with them before casting judgment either way
.
You don’t have to agree with it. You merely need to understand the Doctrine at debate here. If you don’t, please educate yourself. Then make a judgment.

Posted by: Read Your Catechism, Msgr | November 16, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

“They can’t put that toothpaste back in the tube.”
Yes, but it looks like Msgr. Laughlin can clean up some of the sticky mess.

Posted by: kat | November 16, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Wow. Reminds me of Jim Jones and kool-aid.

Posted by: Common Sense | November 16, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Correction: I meant: NO, he can’t. . .

Posted by: kat | November 16, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

seems to me that if the Old Testament rules were applied, all the ‘ped priests’ and all who reshuffled them around to other churchs would have been killed according to biblical law…..
.. ‘the word’ is changed through the centuries by men….. written by men and changed by men to suit current conditions and maintain control.

Posted by: Blue | November 16, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

another perspective….
“From a contemporary standpoint, some of the punishments and laws described in the Bible are viewed as being morally questionable, or even abhorrent. Some typical points of criticism of the Bible’s legal code include:
The Bible tacitly endorses certain forms of slavery; it records many laws and procedures dealing with slaves.
The Bible’s strictures on homosexual sex are seen as outmoded by some groups. As well, the Bible’s endorsement of capital punishment and its restriction on adultery are often viewed in a similar light.
On the other hand, more conservative critics are more critical of the Bible’s tacit approval toward polygamy.
Even among proponents of capital punishment, many of the crimes which the Bible records as punishable by death are not currently regarded as deserving of this penalty. Examples include idol worship, as well as the crimes of striking or cursing one’s parents.
Additionally, many of the military punishments recorded in the Bible would today be considered to be war crimes, or, at the very least, unwarranted and excessive.
These events are sometimes labeled “atrocities” by critics of Christianity (fundamentalist Christianity in particular), and presented as examples of ridiculousness, inconsistency and hypocrisy in those who subscribe to a literal interpretation of the Bible. One website summarizes the argument:
“Myth: The Bible is morally pure and free from atrocity. Fact: The Bible is filled with countless acts of barbarism and tyranny.”
The argument dates back at least as far as 1795, voiced by Thomas Paine in The Age Of Reason.”

Posted by: Blue | November 16, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

God bless Fr. Newman, and may God also guide and enlighten the Monsignor. Everything Fr. Newman has said is 100% correct; and the Monsignor is gravely wrong to silence him. We need more priests, more ordinary Catholic laypeople, and especially more Catholic monsignors and bishops like Fr. Newman, who are not afraid and terrified of speaking out on controversial moral issues.
Pray for an end to abortion!

Posted by: Alex | November 16, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

There will always be abortion whether it’s legal or not. So it’s best to keep it legal.

Posted by: annie | November 16, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

“Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation.”
This sounds a little too scatological for comfort, which might not be particularly surprising given the source, a Roman Catholic priest in Greenville, S.C., or the context of contemporary Catholicism in which all things down there seem irrevocably tainted. (Is “contemporary” a misnomer?). Nonetheless, this is how the Rev. Jay Scott Newman counseled President-elect Barack Obama supporters at St. Mary’s Catholic Church against taking a seat at the Lord’s table until they atone for the sin of voting for a candidate who lacks awareness that abortion “is the greatest threat to the peace and security of the United States and constitutes a clear and present danger to the common good.”
Hmm, the greatest threat: abortion or, say, terrorists? Poignant decisions, stirrups, speculum, dilation and curettage, and suction, resulting in dead fetuses, versus religious schools nurturing new generations with a theology of superiority and hate, improvised explosive devices, kidnappings, rapes, suicide bombers, crippled economies and beheadings, resulting in dead non-combatants and military personnel.
Oops: Scratch that religious schools thing. It seems non-terrorists do that, too — check out some of your local Sunday schools and Bible camps. It makes one wonder at what point hate mongering oozes into terrorism.
Anyway, Newman’s homily suggests Obama, Republican presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, President George W. Bush, our national security and military leadership and, oh, every head of every developed nation on Earth are all wrong about the threat of terrorism. Seems we might have been misled lo these last seven years.
Perhaps, had the $864 billion budgeted since September 2001 for the U.S. military to fight a war on terror, been spent on family planning and education and birth control instead, we might have rid the United States of abortion, the “murderous abomination that cries out to Heaven for vengeance.” (Odd, the good reverend sounds rather like one of those terrorist fellows, doesn’t he?)
Oh, oops again: The Catholic Church has a thing about birth control, and given the failure of the Bush administration’s abstinence only sex ed, those billions might not have been an effective abortion deterrent. I suppose we could have bought mass quantities of chastity belts, but from the looks of them, most are not intended to forestall fornication. (Find your own link to that one.)
Despite his prayer for vengeance, Newman might have been correct when he declared the abortion debate a 30-year-old culture war, although he was off on the math. Perhaps he’s too busy counting the expenses of dispensations to accurately subtract 1973 from 2008. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the 1973 Roe v. Wade case established women’s right to privacy and unlimited access to abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy, and the issue has indeed been a battle ever since, occasionally deadly, always bitter. Just this past election South Dakota voters defeated for the second time an effort to ban most abortions and create a case to overturn Roe v. Wade, and anti-abortion rights advocates must be mourning the McCain-Palin defeat as a lost opportunity to stack the Supreme Court even higher against Roe than Bush did. But the combatants in this conflict, for all their dedicated passion and prayer, could be blown away — literally — by the tangible commitment of a terrorist. So there’s a certain arrogance to Newman’s claim that abortion is the greatest threat to the United States and a danger to the common good.
I might be obnoxious — and arrogant — but I’m not a threat or a danger to anyone except the rodents that got to my heirloom tomatoes before I did. I have had an abortion and although it was frightening and sorrowful, it was my decision, my loss, my fear, my sorrow — not the government’s, not any organized religion’s, not those who constitute the common good. The thought of any such entity inserting itself in my most intimate quandaries makes me, well, gag — and I don’t expect anti-abortion advocates to understand that.
All of which is a long winded way of declaring my hope that Obama and the 111th Congress overturn Bush’s executive order extending the Global Gag Rule on abortion and appoint wise hearts and minds to our Supreme Court, minds and hearts that do not believe they belong in women’s bloomers.
We’re having enough trouble keeping the likes of Father Newman out of them, speaking figuratively, of course.

Posted by: Kit-Bacon Gressitt | November 16, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Father Newman has the great faith of the Apostle Paul.
He has pointed out the great sin of abortion in our midst, and the complicity and sin of those who vote for those who bring abortion to our nation. Some voters think they can claim Christianity with their mouths and side with Satan in the voting booth….
It is refreshing to hear the truth about sin from from Father Newman.
Speak the Truth like Paul!

Posted by: Ken Lentz | November 16, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

He’s right, why belong to a church if you dont believe in anything it stands for?

Posted by: TDPro | November 16, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Christians make me scared for my life. They claim to be peaceful. But are known for two thousand years to be hateful, fear mongering, blasphemous people themselves.
If you want to pray for someone. Pray for yourselves. For the hate you have been taught. To see the clarity through your own mind. Through your own heart. And not that of a person claiming to be the word of “god”.
No body is pro-abortion. They just see things more rationally than those who are pro-life. If you outlaw abortion you will have girls getting illegal, and dangerous black market abortions. Its going to happen no matter how hard you pray. And obviously your praying has not helped thusfar. I do not think anyone. No human, has the right to tell me what to do with my body. Especially the federal government! They are not god. Nor should they play god. YOU ARE NOT GOD. And no where in the bible does it mention abortion. So you have no sanding on which to judge me. Other than you wanting to play god. Which you have no right to do so. Please. Go back and read each passage concerning judgment. Maybe you will have clarity.
If the rapture does happen. I dont see many people following Jesus to the heavens. Maybe a couple of people in this world. But those who hate in the name of God will receive the same judgment as those they throw stones at. And rightfully so.

Posted by: Sandy | November 16, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

‘There will always be abortion whether it’s legal or not. So it’s best to keep it legal’.
There will always be murder, assault, larceny, burglary, robbery, child abuse, arson, drunk driving, conspiracy, and tax evasion.
Another one of those mindless chants that can’t survive the slightest second thought. Lets legalize everything and move on.

Posted by: Superheater | November 16, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

We are born with discernment to see right and wrong and act accordingly.
This is not judgement or condemnation, you see what you see and you discern whether its right or wrong and act on it for your own life.
In the end we will answer for it individually.
End of argument

Posted by: TDPro | November 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Superheater, not a mindless chant just a fact. Your argument is moot because it’s already legal.

Posted by: annie | November 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

How sad, that many who have commented are jumping on the anti-christian bandwagon. I am proud of Fr. Newman for firmly stating the facts. In supporting a pro-abortion candidate for public office, a christian, does, indeed sin. The diocese should be applauding Fr. Newman’s veracity and not condemn it. As well, I see those who have written calling for the church’s tax exempt status to be revoked. So be it. When we put tax relief ahead of doctrine, we are all doomed to hell. This is the most important issue for contemporary christians. Make no mistake about it. May God help us all.

Posted by: Rev. Lorenzo Zipeto | November 16, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I don’t remember the Catholic Church telling their parishioners that voting for Bush in 2004 would be evil as he had invaded a country unnecessarily which resulted in tens of thousands of innocent civilians dying and many permanently maimed. Why do the living children and adults here not seem to matter as much as the unborn?
The subject of abortions should be addressed in regards to our efforts to lessen the numbers of them. Not by making abortions illegal but by making the circumstances that encourage that decision less frequent.
Deal with poverty and the number of abortions will go down.
Offer free sterilizations to those who already have the amount of children they have enough money, time, patience and energy for.It takes an enormous amount of all three to raise a child until they are 18, something those who want to ban abortions forget. It isn’t about just caring for a cute little baby but about entering an 18+ year marathon. No one should presume to tell anyone they have to have a child. It should be a decision based on love and a realistic assessment of the ability to do the job of raising a child well.

Posted by: Lydia | November 16, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Monsignor Laughlin should apologize to Father Newman as should anyone who accused him of using the pulpit to preach politics. The Catholic Church in SC is playing politics and trying to be politically correct. Everything Father Newman did was correct – the media took the story and spun it to create a lie about the words he wrote in his bulletin to his parishioners. If the diocese is too blind to see this, then the Pope needs to appoint a Bishop who sees through the false allegations.
God bless, you, Father Newman! I pray more priests will be more focused on teaching and preaching the Gospels of LIFE!
Your parish is very blest to have you as their pastor!

Posted by: Catholic and Proud of it! | November 16, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

As I read the comments I am taken by the number of folks who bash the church. I dont get it. No one has to be a Catholic. I dont see Catholics bashing the Methodists or Lutherans. Nobody is twisting anyone’s arm here. To those who want to leave the church or have left it – ok, so goodbye. I hope you find what you want somewhere else.

Posted by: Jack | November 16, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Typical Catholic hypocracy. As soon as a priest recognizes the absolute truth of the matter, he is rebuked by the higher ups for not being “politically correct.” I left the whorish church years ago and started studying God’s word on my own. The “Roman” Catholic church can never seem to conclude exactly WHAT is God’s word. They flip-flop on all points that are not politically to their advantage. At least the priest is looking out for the unborn and for that I commend him. Seems to me like a no brainer, that is unless you are a hypocrite.

Posted by: Southernmann | November 16, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

“The kind of person who contributes money to deny their fellow citizens their civil rights are not someday magically going to be part of the solution: they’re the problem. These are not people to be reasoned with; they’re ignorant, they’re haters and they’re bigots and the only thing people like that understand is power.
So when they stick their noses in other people’s affairs, they forfeit the right to be considered just another “ordinary person”. They’re involved and they would be foolish to expect that those other people in whose private affairs they have meddled wouldn’t return the favor. As they say: you pays your money and you takes your chances.
You don’t get to heaven above by trampling someone else’s heaven on earth.”

Posted by: Tex | November 16, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

This whole discussion seems to miss some very important points:
1. The RCC is comprised of an heirarchy of humans( who are by nature fallible) and of doctrine which is derived from traditions and judeo christian scriptures. Therefore, the acts or words of some men and women in various strata of the RCC leadership may vary. Sometimes it will be in conformity with the RCC Catechism and Doctrine and sometimes some of them won’t.
2. Church affiliations are voluntary. A person can choose to be Catholic or Baptist where one cannot choose to be caucasia or hispanic. One can choose to be a Mason or Rotary Club etc…
each has their own set of rules, teachings and traditions. If one joins the Masons but thinks it should be run like the boy scouts, one should quit the Masons and join the boy scouts instead. Don’t get vindictive and hateful at the Masons for not wanting to be boy scouts. According to a proverb spoken by a Jewish Sage: two people cannot walk down the same road together unless they be agreed upon the direction they should go. This is a great insight into Human relations.
This is true for all human relationships, Marriage, clubs, religions, governments, countries, and global institutions. So if you dont like RCC Doctrine, then dont be a Catholic. Or go start your own church like Luther did.

Posted by: slickvoodoodaddy | November 16, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

There is another aspect of this debate that is amiss: that is that of rights.
Most people are not aware what a Right or Rights is/are and where /how they are from. How many people have sat and thought about this? What makes a right a right. Why do rights exist? What is the nature of a right or rights? Are rights inclusive or exclusive. Do rights have boundaries? Why or Why not? If so, what are those boundaries?
What is the difference between rights and privilages.

Posted by: slickvoodoodaddy | November 16, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Bravo to SuperVoodooDaddy,
Thank you for your common sense. This has to do with exactly what you called out. Every organization has rules – or they don’t stay an organization very long.
We join organizations if we find them appealing. After we join – and the rules are changed/altered – we have a choice. We can leave OR we can stand in the gap and call out the rulebreaker and stay.
This has nothing to do with hypocrisy you bunch of morons – we are ALL hypocrites. The Catholic Church has never claimed otherwise. Anything involving humans is subject to moral failure.
This has to do with a leader not following those rules we talked about – and that leader is the Monsignor.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church – for the non-Catholics (and some Catholics)playing along and adding their two cents without referring to the Doctrine steering this issue – is clear when it comes to abortion.
For the sake of debate, put away your opinion and embrace the facts:
The Catholic Church says Zero tolerance on abortion. Read par 2270-2275.
Paragraph 2272 says, “Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense.”
Formal cooperation – to take part in, allow, endorse, etc. Does anyone need any further explanation on what the meaning is?
Guess what the Catholic Church says you’re supposed to do after committing a grave sin (offense) and before receiving Holy Communion?
That’s right.
Go to Confession aka the Sacrament of Penance.
Just like Father Newman said.
The Monsignor only offered a portion of the Catechism that basically says we’re free to do what we want to do.
We are. It’s called free will.
What the Monsignor GROSSLY NEGLECTED to mention is that if you are Catholic, you will be held accountable for acting with that same free will against your doctrine.
Not a surprise. A lot of leadership kowtows to public opinion and heavy wallets.
Father Newman was standing by the rulebook. Then the Monsignor slapped him down.
Talk about shipwrecking someone’s faith in what he was told to believe in.
I pray for scales to fall from the leader’s eyes, so that the sheep they are leading may be fed the way Christ said they should, not the way leadership wants.

Posted by: readyourcatechism, msgr | November 16, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

I think St. John Chrysostom had it right when he said “the road to hell is paved with the skulls of bishops.”

Posted by: Kramo | November 16, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

“Therefore, if a person has formed his or her conscience well, he or she should not be denied Communion, nor be told to go to confession before receiving Communion.”
In other words…
Then the snake said to the woman,’No! You will not die!’ God knows in fact that the day you eat it your eyes will be open and you will be like gods, knowing good from evil’ Gen 3:4

Posted by: John | November 16, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

What the monsignor failed to explain was that Catholics are to exercise their ‘free will choices’ based on a FORMED conscience. That formation comes to us through the teaching’s of The Holy Roman Catholic Church. Unfortunately, most Bishops and many of their Priests do not believe this anymore. So, when a Priest displays the courage (that they lack) to speak out in defense of Catholic teaching, we hear condemnations from the ‘lame and lavender’ who fill our chancery’s.

Posted by: richard mandel | November 16, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Hey, some great comments here. There are some great Priests coming up through the ranks; men who are willing to speak the Truth and preach the Gospel and allow themselves to be put on the Cross. God willing, some of those men will become Bishops in the next 20 years.

Posted by: delly | November 16, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

We grew up very poor. My mother who would not use birth control, because it was against the catholic religion, kept getting pregnant. She used to put cardboard in her shoes because she couldn’t afford a new pair. She worked 3 jobs to make sure we were all fed. Our priest, knowing the circumstancs of our family, finally told her to take birth control. Was he wrong in doing this. No, I think he probably saved our lives. Should my mother not receive communion because of this. Again, no. The church are all men and have no idea about women’s issues.

Posted by: erin | November 16, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

We in the Catholic Church are called to defend the life of a child who has no voice. There is no moral equivalent to that of supporting abortion. War and the death penalty are not morally equivalent to defending the defenseless. This Msgr is playing politics. There is a fear that people will leave the Church and eventually it will loose it’s tax exempt status. I for one would love to see Pelosi and Biden leave the Church. They are giving it a bad name so are all of the other supporters who have stood before God in Communion and choose not to ask for forgiveness. They refuse to see that they are crucifying Christ over and over again. Kelly, no one is telling you what to do with your body they are just saying what the Church believes. If you don’t belong then you shouldn’t be offended. The constitution gives people the right to protest to save a child. Women think they are being persecuted but in the end it’s the child that is being persecuted by the mother. I always tell young girls, you do have a right, don’t get pregnant. Then again so many women will and they suffer terribly from the abortion afterwards. These arguments always remind me of the story of Christ in the Temple. Actually I can’t wait until his retun to hold up this Priest and so many others for being real and defending life. Their position is the last battleground in faith that Christ has asked to be defended by the faithful. When one becomes versed on the messages that St. Faustina has relayed from Christ on the subject of life then they will understand. If we would only trust God and His mercy only then will the world change to bless unborn children to celebrate the beautiful world that we have been given to live in, only then will we be truly free.

Posted by: Maureen | November 16, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

As a protestant father of eight I was leading my family into full communion into the Catholic Church with the guidance of Father Newman. He is a very caring individual who has the safety and concern for his flock at the top of his priorities. This politically correct action of the Diocese of South Carolina has disgusted me to the point to turn my back and leave this once believed fairy tale called the Catholic Church. Look now for the faithful believers who respect life to re-think this political makeup of the Church, another Schism on the horizon??

Posted by: Lance | November 16, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

It is because of priests like this that I am taking the RCIA (conversion classes to join the Catholic Church). The Church understands how we are living in a culture of death which is turning away from the way of Jesus.
God bless your courage, Father!

Posted by: Don Uthole | November 16, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Don’t give up on the Church because of the unfaithfulness of many North American Bishops. I would not be surprised if the bold priest becomes a bishop in a couple decades. Rome is going to clean house in North America one of these days.

Posted by: Don Uthole | November 16, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Why does Rome, a foreign government get to exert control over anything in the American poltical and secular world?

Posted by: X's | November 17, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

by Rome, I meant the Vatican

Posted by: X's | November 17, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Lance. I understand your position but tt is obvious that you have been called by Christ to be a memeber of the faithful. Christ is in a battle for souls and this Priest understands that. If the Church as a whole does not stand up for life who will? I hope and pray you hold on to the decision that the Holy Spirit obviously endowed you with. God Bless you and your family.

Posted by: Maureen | November 17, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Well. well. Isn’t it time for the RCC to just go away in the USA? Perhaps they will take the bigots in SC with them. This is unbelieveable, this priest is a bad bad power hungry guy. or is he an evangelist afterall?

Posted by: Janie | November 17, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Who is this man who speaks for God? Only God can decide who sins and who does not. Men like this will pay a price in the afterlife for their sins. This is why so many people repudiate religion. He probably would have participated in the inquisition.

Posted by: larry weismiller | November 17, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

dear father newman:
from nyc/and la girl.
1. we are angels, and yes, we agree.
2. we live in severely unjust
turbulent times and cities that are saturated with evil and sin in USA.
3. Thank GOD someone has the testesterone to state GODS’S will for us and publically. Yes, Obomba is
leading USA into a pit of more haides and SIN..
God bless all who stand up to this
poor leadership stance.
Life is not to be taken nor harmed.
we are pro lifers–the model angels.
USA/NYC/LA –

Posted by: miss angelique | November 17, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Someone said it best on a talk show today: why is it those who are so concerned with “natural” and “green” are so inversely open to doing unnatural things to our own bodies – for example, those who are naturalists tend to be ok with: birth control (adding chemicals in our bodies to prevent a natural act); abortion (scraping out a natural being out of our bodies); gay and lesbian relationships (natural way is a man with a woman); etc. Wouldn’t one think that those who are dyed-in-the-wool naturalist understand that the above (and others) are part of being natural as well?
On another note: The church is just like a bank. We all use banks to store money and take money out. If we don’t like a policy or procedure the bank is supporting, you can take your money elsewhere’s. Likewise, if you say you are a Catholic and want to be a practicing Catholic, you have to play by the Catholic rules or go to another church whose rules you do agree with. Why do you waste your time complaining when you can enjoy yourself somewhere else? Com’on; put your brain cells to more productive use like how do we get out of this financial crisis instead of wasting time?

Posted by: Donna | November 17, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

BEFORE YOU READ THIS::: The fundamental question is: do you believe in the bible? If not: forget it. Don’t waste your time reading further. Otherwise, please consider this sermon I “borrowed” from a wise man.
“DID GOD REALLY SAY . . .?”
Genesis 3:1-3
“Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the LORD God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
Do you recall hearing the story of a pastor who was assigned to a new church? He had only been there a few weeks when he decided to move the piano from one side of the church to the other.
The following Sunday as people gathered, they were in shock! “Why was the piano moved—by whom—and by what authority?” The pastor explained that he was the guilty party and had done so to improve access to the platform. The incident created such a stir that the pastor was asked to resign.
About a year later this pastor was traveling through the area and stopped by to visit with the new pastor who was a friend of his. He was shocked to notice that the piano had been moved to the exact location he had moved it that started the fuss.
In utter amazement he asked his replacement how he had been able to carry off the coup. The wise, older pastor just smiled and stroked his chin and replied with a sly grin; “A few inches a week!”
There are harmless things such as this that may be laughed at, but the tragedy is that all too often we are confronted with situations that should never be compromised. God’s Word is the same yesterday, today and forever.
There is no justification for individuals, church assemblies or political groups to compromise with the absolutes of the Word of God. God does not change and His Word is our sure foundation.
Compromise is a dangerous concept when we are dealing with spiritual truths. Consider two aspects of the definition of the word: (1) To expose or make liable to danger, suspicion, or disrepute. (2) Settlement of a disagreement in which each side agrees to give up part of its demands.
Read those two definitions once again. Can you even imagine that God would ever be pleased for us to violate His inerrant Word and thus expose ourselves to liable, suspicion or disrepute? Nor do I!
What happened in the Garden of Eden? Satan incited Adam and Eve to make a compromise with God’s command. He convinced them that God was not to be trusted and that they could make their own decisions about what was right and wrong.
Satan wanted to be like God and his strategy has always been to put within the heart of fallen mankind the same desire. The next time you are tempted to make a compromise with God’s absolutes, you can rest assured that it is the enemy’s work.
I Corinthians 15:58; “Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain.”
Blessings dear hearts. Draw near to God today, trust Him completely and be a blessing!

Posted by: JDKB | November 17, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

What about Obama’s other political positions; is there nothing that Catholicism and Obama both support? What about McCain’s political positions- I’m sure he has some that the Catholic church would consider morally wrong.
Voting for a president involves many, many issues. I am a Catholic, I support Obama because I believe he is the lesser of two evils, and I am dead set against abortion. I refuse to believe this is a sin or that I can’t hold all these beliefs simultaneously.

Posted by: Megan | November 17, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Is this the same church where some of them are homosexuals???
God help us all.

Posted by: linda | November 18, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

I think Father Newman was correct in what he said. Abortion, or voting for someone who is so pro-abortion, is definitely a serious sin. I am not entirely sure about excommunication since I feel that almost no sin is beyond God’s mercy to forgive if one is sincerely penitent. I think he was talking about a temporary excommunication until the person confesses. However, key to this is that the person is truly sorry for the offense. The bishop, I believe, was wrong. For those who don’t like Catholic doctrine, go elsewhere. It is what it is, and you have mega choices of churches to belong to if the doctrines are too restrictive for you. As for me and my husband, we are very devout and have no trouble following the rules. In fact, being aware of sinning against God, ourselves and others, has made us much better people. As someone eloquently put it, if you don’t like the club, don’t join. If you can stick with it, the rewards are great.

Posted by: CatholicNproud | November 18, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I Thank God for priests like Fr. Jay Newman who are true defenders of the Roman Catholic Church. I have always been brought up in my beloved Catholic faith that the sanctity of human life is one of the most important teachings of the Catholic Church. I am saddened to hear that the Diocese of Charleston feels otherwise under the direction of Msgr. Martin Laughlin. Yes, Msgr. Laughlin…people have free will to make their own personal choices, but in the Catholic Church it is the SOLE responsibility of the priests, bishops, cardinals,etc. to inform their flock as to what is immoral or not…a sin or not! I am so ashamed of not my church, but of the free will of the American Bishops in not speaking out against the evil in the world…especially the evils of abortion and everyone that supports it! Msgr. Laughlin and the Diocese of Charleston have created yet another scandal to the Catholic Church and have made a mockery out of its followers who live accordingly to the teachings of the Catholic Church. I am left to wonder what God is really thinking right now!?

Posted by: Windy Daly | November 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

I so appreciate the position of the Diocese. My conscience and my belief in what is just is between me and God. When the church gets involved in the political arena, it is a distraction. I do not think any of us could deem the Republican Party to be God’s chosen party. Neither candidate is without sin, nor are any of us.

Posted by: Kathy | November 19, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

I so appreciate the position of the Diocese. My conscience and my belief in what is just is between me and God. When the church gets involved in the political arena, it is a distraction. I do not think any of us could deem the Republican Party to be God’s chosen party. Neither candidate is without sin, nor are any of us.
I have to wonder then…why do you call yourself a Catholic if you cannot live according to the teachings of the church? The Catholic Church is responsible for teaching its flock to make moral decisions that coincide with the teachings of the church…this is not something that is a secret within each individual to not be shared with others. Where does your presumption come about the Republican Party?…No one is without sin that is true….but some publicly commit sin when they support abortion in political offices by way of a vote!

Posted by: Wendy Daly | November 19, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Father Newman is correct. The bishops as a whole agree with him and I am thankful for priests like him who understand where the battle is. It begins with life!

Posted by: FinishtheRace | November 19, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Linda,
Some priests are homosexuals. However, they have taken vows to be celebate for life, so it should have no bearing on their priestly duties. I believe most of them are celebate, but you only hear about the ones that have broken their vows. When a man goes thru the seminary, there are ways that the Church tries to weed out the ones who are not sincere or who may be at risk for bad behavior. However, of late there have been quite a few that have fallen below the radar and were not caught before they committed crimes. This is very unfortunate, since the Church has been seen as complicit in these acts, which it is not. I also believe that if they have broken their vows in an illegal way, then they should be prosecuted according to the law. And BTW, priests are certainly not the only homosexual clergy out there. Clergy that are homosexual can be found in every religion, as can pedophilia. It is just more publicized when it is the Catholic Church because of the influence the Church as in the world with one billion Catholics worldwide. Today, given the nature of our society, every Christian church has been under attack, unless they are extremely liberal. But I feel the Catholics get more than their fair share of criticism.

Posted by: Not Linda | November 19, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Kathy,
What part of “thou shalt not kill” don’t you undestand? This is universal in every major religion, with the possible exception of the “religion of peace,” of course. There are circumstances which allow killing such as self defense, but this is the most innocent and defenseless of all life, and certainly that doesn’t apply to abortions. So you can certainly continue to go to mass and receive communion, but you should be aware that every basic tenet of the Catholic Church is clear that you are committing a mortal (very serious) sin if you continue to do so. Same is true if you’ve had an abortion, performed an abortion, or vote for/pass legilation legalizing abortion. The Church is quite clear on this and has, in fact, told certain “Catholic” politicians that they should not be receiving communion while holding these views and being a proponent of abortion.

Posted by: CatholicNproud | November 19, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

The SC Priest is only doing his job. Here is the canon law on the matter:
“Any Catholic who supports intrinsically evil acts (abortion, euthanasia, cloning, same-sex marriage, etc), votes for them, or otherwise financially supports or furthers their cause, cannot remain Catholic. Catholics must adhere to Catholic teaching or they separate themselves from the Church; the Body of Christ. Such Catholics are excommunicated by virtue of the acts themselves. A latae sententiae (automatic) excommunication is triggered when they support, enable, and perpetuate such obvious and egregious evil (Cf. Code of Canon Law, Canons 1364, 1398; Canon 1329, §2). They are in turn forbidden from approaching the sacraments as the result (Cf. Catechism of Catholic Church # 1463).”

Posted by: Jane_P | November 20, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

JaneP, your comments are so full of bias and misinformation. You quote from some other hokum site from some commentator that references 3 codes of Canon (1329, 1397, 1364). If one is to go to the Canon itself (which is easy to do) nowhere is it found that voting for a politician is “material complicity” in abortion, it is a huge stretch to say otherwise.
Leading scholars are saying that your approach has FAILED; concentrating on outlawing abortion is still allowing babies to die, when proven methods to reduce abortions (supported by the President-elect) will save FAR MORE babies than your short sighted failed policies.
Lets save all life, especially at the very beginning of life, by supporting women, lifting folks out of poverty, and encouraging women morally and finacially to carry their babies to term.
While you dawdle trying to outlaw abortion (your precious Republicans have done WHAT to outlaw abortion?) BABIES ARE DYING. Enough said.

Posted by: Lost and Found | November 26, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

Rev laughlin should take the issue directly, Fr. Newman is correct in his reasoning supported by the Catholic dogma, whilst Rev laughlin is just plain playing politics himself, very obviously! Seniority does not mean that you are always right?

Posted by: joel | July 25, 2010, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Father Newman is a part of what drove me from the church. By choosing only one area of human dignity as area of most concern, an area that is very ambiguous and which even the church is unable to determine, when life begins in the womb, the church misses other ares of killing innocents. Why not use the same energy to oppose wars like the one in Iraq? Whe is the venom? Does Newman give communion to US soldiers fighting that war? And better yet what about the genocide in Ruwanda? Catholic priests actually participated in killing and encouraging others to kill innocents and the pope the church now wants to glorify with sainthood did nothing about it even when asked to do so. So the church obviously really does not now nor in history has ever really cared about human life. Talk about a self serving weak dogma when serious matters are at hand. What a weak institution that fails to stand up to what it says is its ddoctrine! And it wants to glorify the man who lead this approach! Shame.

Posted by: Might is Right | May 15, 2011, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.