Do Something?
Half of likely voters believe that if elected Barack Obama actually could do something to improve the economy, and more, nearly six in 10, think he’d “change the culture” of Washington – far more than hold either expectation of John McCain.
Just 29 percent in the latest ABC News/Washington Post tracking poll think McCain could improve the economy, and 26 percent think he’d change Washington – 21 and 32 points behind Obama, respectively, on these measures.
A difference in partisan assessments is part of the cause. Eighty percent of Democrats say Obama could improve the economy – but fewer Republicans, 57 percent, say their party’s candidate could do the same. And in the political middle, 45 percent of independents think Obama could improve the economy, while 27 percent say the same of McCain.
The divisions on changing Washington are also striking. Seventy-three percent of Democrats say Obama would change the culture of the nation’s capital; just 50 percent of Republicans say the same of McCain. And among independents, 58 percent say Obama would bring change, vs. just 26 percent who say McCain would do so.
For Obama, differences on these questions are generational as well as political. Among likely voters under age 30, three-quarters think Obama could improve the economy and change the culture in Washington alike. Among senior citizens those fall to 46 and 53 percent, respectively.
There’s no such generational gap for McCain; about three in 10 likely voters, young and seniors alike, think he could make progress on either goal.
While McCain has an overall advantage in vote preference among white voters, on these questions there’s a gap in Obama’s favor. Forty-two percent of whites think Obama could change the economy; more, 52 percent, think he could change the culture of Washington. But just 33 and 29 percent of whites, respectively, say the same of McCain.
These measures underscore two key Obama advantages. The economy is the overriding issue of the campaign, and likely voters by 54-40 percent trust him over McCain to handle it. And with a record number saying the country’s seriously off on the wrong track, “change,” the theme that saw Obama through the primaries, continues to boost his candidacy.
Email
Newt Gingrich's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Of course he would change the culture. He already wants to create a civilian “security force” to rival our military.. What would he need a force so powerful for against America’s citizens?
Here is a video of Obama saying just that:
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/11/obamas-civilian-security-force-scary.html
If you want a few reasons to vote for / against Obama I’ve written my thoughts on it: http://www.middleofright.com/2008/10/top-reasons-to-vote-for-obama.html
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Clearly Obama is the better candidate.
It just baffles me to try to understand what on earth is appealing to McCain’s supporters? He seems to care more about businesses than people. Granted, companies supply jobs – but since (obviously) not everyone can own a business wouldn’t it make more sense care more about the masses?
And whenever he brings up how businesses in the U.S. (are suppose to) pay 35% in taxes – JUST ONCE I’d like to hear him admit how they pay much less through LOOP HOLES and how he plans on stopping that!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Marie:
Do you really want what Obama offers. When was the last time a leader did what Obama wants to do in the below video? Please tell me why does he need a civilian force as strong as our Armed Forces? Tell me?
Here is a video of Obama saying just that:
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/11/obamas-civilian-security-force-scary.html
Posted by: chuck | November 2, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Obama did his homework first before
he decided to be one of the candidates.
He realised before hand that something is wrong somewhere and must be CHANGED.
He has a vision and he sees more far than most of us can imagine of.
Posted by: FM | November 2, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
It just baffles me to try to understand what on earth is appealing to McCain’s supporters?Posted by: Marie | Nov 2, 2008 8:01:36 AM
I think it’s that creepy laugh. You got me on that one of what is so appealing.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
People are voting for McCain because they are smarter than the useful idiots voting for Obama and they see thru the hype.
Obama’s Tax Advertisement misleadingly quotes a Heritage Foundation Analyst: “…the middle class would likely pay less under Mr. Obama’s plan…” So what’s REALLY on either side of those dots?
The Summary:
Through the lens of sound tax policy, both McCain’s and Obama’s tax plans would leave the tax code more complicated than it is today. Even so, McCain’s plan has important advantages through its focus on keeping tax rates low–and lowering them further in some instances–while improving incentives for investment and correcting an extremely harmful tax distortion at the heart of much of the trouble in America’s health care financing system.
In contrast, the Obama plan raises income tax rates, raises payroll taxes on a delayed basis, and actively increases the use of the tax system to redistribute income to those who pay little or no income tax. Each of these aspects move the tax code in a decidedly inappropriate direction.
On balance, the McCain plan would be decidedly better for economic growth, largely because it would lower tax rates while the Obama plan would raise tax rates. Under the McCain tax plan, the economy would be expected to be about $320 billion greater, and average household income about $2,600 higher than would be the case under the Obama tax plan.
Read the full article:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm2101.cfm
Posted by: mg | November 2, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Chuck,
Ok – I watched the video.
And? So? You’ll notice he’s speaking in general terms (not in an attempt to be “vague” but to allude to many internal/domestic options in achieving national security.
Do you honestly think national security can ONLY come through our military?? That it can only come through our military being abroad/overseas??
Think about it, Chuck.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
“what on earth is appealing to McCain’s supporters”
I would rather have a mediocre president then one that believes our constitution is “fundamentally flawed” and wants to “fundamentally change” our country.
I’m sorry, but our country isn’t fundamentally broken. It has its ups and downs but no need to turn it into Cuba just because the stock market is down.
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/11/why-barack-obama-is-wrong-for-our.html
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
@ mg:
No offense, but who the hell cares if tax rates are low, but everything else is rising? (Case in point: you see how fast AND LOW gas price have fallen from where they were earlier this year, don’t you?)
And who cares if they “improve incentives” for those (fortunate few) who are able to invest? Most people (in the city and in the country) are living paycheck to paycheck!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Marie – in case you weren’t aware we already have local police and the FBI.
What reasons do you think we need another force that would need to be as powerful as the most powerful military in human history?
Do you honestly think an organization like the FBI needs an aircraft carrier and strike planes? Who would he wield them against?
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Change the culture in Washington? Like the Clinton’s, who honed the art of character assassination to a level never before seen in Washington? (e.g. Jennifer Flowers being pilloried by the Clinton’s, yet her claims turned out to be true. Paula Jones being pilloried by the Clinton’s, yet her claims turned out to be true. Monica Lewinsky being pilloried by the Clinton’s, yet her claims turned out to be true. Kathleen Willey being pilloried by the Clinton’s, yet her claims turned out to be true.)
Posted by: Tyrone | November 2, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
I have a family to support. The Republicans have done two things for me in the last eight years, Jack and Squat. I can’t afford to vote for John McCain.
Posted by: blindhowlin | November 2, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
blindhowlin – the government isn’t there to do things for you. Sorry if no one told you before you got married and had kids. But taking care of them is your responsibility not the governments.
“Ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country”
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
What really bother me is people like Marie just followed BLINDLY without really understand WHAT Obama is saying.
Let me give you some hints:
1. “Spread the wealth around”
2. He mentioned “Socialistic” when talking about his tax plan
3. Don’t forget “communism” that he also alluded to (aka Frank Marshall Davis as his mentor)
4. Louis Farrakhan said/claimed that Obama is their mersiah to rescue them
5. The OLD saying you are WHAT companies you keep. Have you seen his companies?
Now, if you are still baffling, go take your meds and think about it.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
First, WOW!… You would rather have a “mediocre” President?
Secondly, I thought on the link you provided you show a video of Obama saying that about our constitution OR AT LEAST cite the source within the article… but I see neither “proof” was supplied.
I honestly believe when people try to put up an argument to “protect” our constitution – they are really hiding behind a fear of change that is rooted in fears of some losing their privileged status.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
If you want a few reasons to vote for / against Obama I’ve written my thoughts on it: http://www.middleofright.com/2008/10/top-reasons-to-vote-for-obama.html
“it should goto middle class people, people making under $150,000 a year” Joe Biden
He corrected himself in that same speech.
”I don’t regret setting bombs,’I feel we didn’t do enough.” Bill Ayers 9/11/2001
“I had a thousand regrets, but no regrets for opposing the war with every ounce of my strength. I told her that in light of the indiscriminate murder of millions of Vietnamese, we showed remarkable restraint, and that while we tried to sound a piercing alarm in those years, in fact we didn’t do enough to stop the war.” —-No mention of bombs.
Rashid Khalidi – Former Spokesman for the Palestinian Liberation Organization
A board that McCain sat on funded this same person.
There is no indiciation where those quotes were pulled from. Secondly, I in no way shape or form agree with what Ayers did but at least factual info should be posted.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Michael,
Yes, we have the FBI and local police, but it sure didn’t stop the TSA from forming.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Jwench – sorry Biden did not correct himself in the same speech.
Ahh so you post his justification in response but you don’t really believe it. I see. Since we’re bringing up Vietnam I guess you were ok with the fall of Saigon and the millions of South Vietnamese that were slaughtered because people like Ayers let us abandon them?
“A board that McCain sat on funded this same person.”
Which is obviously identical to being close friends to the point where he babysits your kids and you attend dinners where they bash Isreal.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
People like “blindhowlin” will fit in with Obama PROMISES to take care of them. That’s the PROBLEM.
They believe for some reasons the Gov’t will take care of them no matter what.
They certainly forget that the Gov’t is in fact, “We the people”
It is YOUR responsibilities to take care of YOUR family NOT the Gov’t.
Of course, if you want a welfare STATE, then Obama will definitely offer it to you. Remember this, you CAN NOT make MORE than the Gov’t will ALLOW. Follow the RATION and FAIRNESS principles.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Marie – the TSA? Are you serious?
Did you expect FBI agents to go through your suitcase at the airport?
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Voter In America,
One thing that baffles me – is how most McCain supporters (who make the same claims you just did) would say they are Christians – and yet maintain an attitude that says, “Every man for himself and God for us all.” I can’t believe it!!
I live in Houston – and let me tell you “Voter in America” – after Hurricane Ike hit, I was THRILLED to see people come together and help one another. Nothing else really mattered because we were ALL in the same boat!! (It’s just a shame people only tend to do that during a catastrophe).
When will you realize that we’re all in this together and that in helping one another (when we’re united) we are stronger?!
And you say I’m blind… whatever!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Here is where Obama slams our constitution.. sorry I didn’t provide a link. I just assumed that people who spend all their time defending Obama already knew about it.
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/10/three-reasons-to-vote-for-mccain.html
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Marie – I’m one of the people that chipped in quite a bit of money for Ike. My wife and I live in Argyle, TX and goto Galveston quite a bit (well we did).
Now to the point. I’m ok with “spreading my wealth” voluntarily. It is the whole take by force attitude and calling me selfish for not coughing up my money that ticks me off.
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/11/why-barack-obama-is-wrong-for-our.html
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Michael,
Of course I don’t expect the FBI to do that… and so you see the point! I believe that’s exactly what Obama was referring to in that video.
Do you have a problem with the TSA?? Do you see a NEED for that right here on our soil? Or do you think the military should be doing it? I’m curious… sincerely.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Marie: Privileged status? Sorry by I am a working father of 3 kids, make less than 150K per year but I do like the freedoms this country offers. If you honest listened to the video clip there is no doubt what was said!
Obama wants to create a Cilvian Force equal to our Military! Why? We do not need a Cilvian Force that is why we have the FBI/CI/and US Military!
If Obama was so concerned about protecting America he would not worry about us gun owners! Do you honestly think that if America was attacked our Military and all the people in America who owned guns would not step up to fight?
You still did not answer my question Marie, who was the last person to create a Cilvian Force? Do you want a hint? Hitl**
Posted by: chuck | November 2, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Marie – I’m ok with the TSA. What does that have to do with creating a civilian military force with as much funding and force as our military?
You realize we spend 1 TRILLION dollars annually on defense?
That money makes us a military superpower able to take out any military on the face of the planet..
Why would we need to duplicate that for internal control?
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Oh Michael, please – don’t get me wrong – I TOTALLY agree with you on giving money voluntarily… BUT HERE’S THE PROBLEM (lean in closely)… people don’t hardly do it!
Yeah – when catastrophe strikes (hurricane’s, tsunami’s, earthquakes, 9/11) heck yeah! folks do it. But any other day it’s “Every man for himself and God for us all!”
Shoot, that’s why most non-profit/charities oppose a flat tax because THEY KNOW the tax write-off is an “incentive.”
AND YES, I totally agree that Government shouldn’t be doing many things, but lemme ask ya: “Are you doing it?” Are you going next door and helping your elderly neighbor? Are you talking to your kids about honoring their bodies and regarding sex as a special act?? Are you spending quality time with your kids or is TV and XBox theirs (or your) main way of time spent?
The truth is – big “government” isn’t really the problem… because all government does is supply incentives and puts into law things WE SHOULD be doing already!!!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Change the culture? You’ve got to be kidding! Obama is exactly what is wrong with the culture in Washington as he was in Chicago. Campaign contributions for voting the “right way” making noise and getting Government bailouts to fund special interest,(his interest) looking out after your friends by getting them in on building projects such as Rezco and those slum houses in Chicago and last but not least slamming lobbyist at every chance when the guy running his campaign has to be one of the biggest in the US.
Finally, did I mention the rough and tough world of Chicago politics where friends and enemies are treated like dogs and thrown under the bus when standing in the way of the Obama express?
This is not the Obama I thought I knew.
Posted by: david | November 2, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Did you know that out of the 12 million illegals in the country, Obama’s relatives make up half a million. I can see them all in the Lincoln bedroom after they paint the white house BLACK
Posted by: vs | November 2, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
“One thing that baffles me – is how most McCain supporters (who make the same claims you just did) would say they are Christians – and yet maintain an attitude that says, “Every man for himself and God for us all.” I can’t believe it!!
I live in Houston – and let me tell you “Voter in America” – after Hurricane Ike hit, I was THRILLED to see people come together and help one another. Nothing else really mattered because we were ALL in the same boat!! (It’s just a shame people only tend to do that during a catastrophe). ”
Marie,
Let’s sort this out SLOWLY.
1. I am VERY much a CHRISTIAN and MORE than WILLING to help a fellow citizen in need (I have been doing this for years through our charitable org).
2. I did NOT say that EVERY man for himself. I said the Gov’t is NOT your solution. You are responsible for your family.
3. When Ike hit Texas coast, we mobilized our people to help. As in ONE helps anothers since we KNOW that the Gov’t is SLOW in response.
WHAT you and I seem to be DIFFERENT is Obama’s policy.
He offers the SOCIALIST ideology and you AGREE with him. On the other hand, I like to keep it CAPITALISTIC belief.
It has NO bearing on WHETHER or NOT One American will help ANOTHER American in need. You are CERTAINLY missed my point.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
“www.middleoffright.com” ?????????
Hahahahaahahahahaa
The name says it all. Fear mongering and one sided accusations.
Perhaps you should rename it:
http://www.ImAgullibleLemming.com
Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP | November 2, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Marie – I think your expectations on what a socialist government can do are a little absurd.
Do you think Obama will send people out to spend time with your elderly neighbors?
Do you think they will spend time with your kids instead of them playing XBox?
As for American’s not giving – give me a break. We are the most charitable people on the earth.
See here for details:
http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=4854
Regardless of how the left tries to tear down the people of this country it ddoesn’t change the fact that Americans are by far the most caring and compassionate on the planet. We don’t need Obama telling us that we are selfish to give him our money.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Truth Hurts the GOP – Well I congratulate you on being smart enough to know that politically right people are usually Republicans. Beyond that I’m not sure why you are giggling unless you are suffering the after effects of smoking too much dope this morning.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Posted by: Michael | Nov 2, 2008 8:37:56 AM
Spin it however you want. That is what Republicans do. McCain helped to fund that same person. I don’t get the double standard with you people.
You have no clue what is on that tape, so how can you pass judgment on it. You are all a bunch of hypocrites. McCain has unsavory connections as well, but you and the other parrots choose to ignore those.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Military super power… ok.
Your logic is like being a bank owner saying, “Ok – we’ll put guards outside of our bank to protect it” but you don’t invest in an alarm system in case someone gets past the guards, nor do you invest in computer software to protect assets in case someone breaks in another way…
Dude, our “security” encompasses much more than our military. No offense, but get a clue!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
well said voter in america….
Posted by: tim | November 2, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
I think you’re hung on the the term “civilian military” – I don’t believe he was speaking literally. As it seems to be an oxymoron.
Posted by: NW | November 2, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
could we all just agree on one thing? BOTH PARTIES LIE. could i see how many in here can actually agree with me? BOTH PARTIES LIE, MANIPULATE, STRETCH THE TRUTH, ETC, ETC. please people, quit acting like “your” party dosent do these things!!!!!!
Posted by: tim | November 2, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Obama offers a “socialist” ideology?
When did Obama state that the means of production should be owned by the government? He didn’t.
Obama proposed a tax system like the one we were using 8 years ago. As I recall, we weren’t socialists in 1998.
Obama proposes a system that would allow ALL Americans to seek medical care. You don’t have to use it if you have a better policy, but it would be offered to those that don’t. That is not “socialist”, it just makes sense in a nation such as ours.
But McCain proposes “free markets” for health care and social security? You should be thankful your social security wasn’t invested in the stock market. You would be 30-40% poorer now.
And McCain’s $5000 hand out for health care? Stupid. It would make health care more expensive for the majority of Americans. It would also mean that many people would not even qualify for insurance regardless of te price.
We could go on. The whole “socialism” line is a joke. It was just a last ditch effort by the McCain campaign to put yet another rediculous label on Obama.
Obama will win this election. McCain’s campaign has been following Obama for months. They have demonstrated no leadership other than their willingness to lead in name calling.
Posted by: It's Over | November 2, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Michael–
I *am* a cop and I think a civilian security force is a splendid idea. Instead of looking at the benefits of such a group you see nothing but conspiracies. Take your medications and go back to bed. You need the rest.
Posted by: Deputy_Bob | November 2, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Tim – I’m with you. Bush/Cheney has soiled the reputation of GOP for years to come. I’m not happy that McCain got the candidacy either. I think there were much more honest people to choose from.
However, voting Obama in is like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. He is so un-American it is appalling.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
im just going to ask a very general question to the obama supporters in here: do you like the idea of the government being in control of ur health care and briefly tell me why?
Posted by: tim | November 2, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Posted by: tim | Nov 2, 2008 9:05:11 AM
I agree with that. Neither party’s candidate is totally clean.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Despite all Obama’s lofty rhedoric and promises, the guy has zero executive and very little legislative experience. Anyone who has high hopes for the next four years will be disappointed. We can all hope for the best, but that’s what it is, hope, not confidence.
Posted by: a reader in ga | November 2, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Deputy_Bob- so what would you do with a force as powerful as our military? Who would you use it against?
I don’t think calling in airstrikes on drugdealers or prostition rings is the right answer here.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Voter in American,
“Capitalism” divides. And I didn’t say YOU said, “Every man for himself…” I said that seems to be the attitude of Republicans – and it contradicts Christian principle.
And the examples I gave (in regards to helping elderly neighbors, and being examples to our kids) centered around incorporating helping others in DAILY living! Not every so often… and that, “Voter In America” – is something most American’s don’t do.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Marie – I’m sure all of the oppressed in North Korea, Cuba and in the 80′s Eastern Europe would disagree with you on whether Capitalism is a good economic system or not.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
I too believe that Obama doesn’t respect the Constitution. There is ample evidence with regaurds to the Second Amendment. An amendment which he would love to completely abolish. The only amendment which really protects we the people from government and makes our government fear us. Which was the amendments sole intention per the authors which wrote it.
Posted by: 48 for a threepeat | November 2, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
I agree – all side manipulate the system.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Deputy_Bob,
Just a question.
Why would you think a civilian security force is a splendid idea?
Isn’t that your “job” to provide security for the people unless you aren’t doing your “job” then you would need someone else to do it for you.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Marie,
Since you agreed that ALL side manipulate the system, we SHOULD debate the GOOD not the BAD of each candidate.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Isn’t that your “job” to provide security for the people unless you aren’t doing your “job” then you would need someone else to do it for you.
Posted by: Voter In America | Nov 2, 2008 9:16:04 AM
If you think about it, with our military spread so thin, who is left to protect the US on our soil.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Michael,
I’m sure people in North Korea, Cuba, and the 80′s USSR would tell you there is more to be thankful and appreciative for in this life than money and material things.
And lemme tell ya – Hurricane Ike was my first natural disaster experience, but when my power was out and my water stopped running for that week – when my cell phone battery died and when I couldn’t get on the internet – I LOVED the simplicity it brought! I enjoyed sitting outside with my neighbors and having block BBQ’s, and watching kids ACTUALLY PLAY outside!
I loved that when our car got a flat my husband and I were able to sit and talk with a White guy and an Asian guy (us, being Black) and share stories of how the Hurricane affected us all in different ways. I love that neighbors no longer became strangers.
We all listened to each, helped one another, and prayed for each other! It was a beautiful experience… because during THAT time – nothing else matter. No one cared who was Black, White or other! No one cared who was Republican or Democrate! We were ALL American’s / all Human’s going through the same experience!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Isn’t Obama really saying that we should expand the National Guard? We are foolish to have eliminated the military as such and closed all the bases. What country does not have an active military? And you can readily see where that elimination has gotten us today.
On another thought, just where is PETA when you need them? Do you suppose that because they have not targeted Palin and her Moose killing ways that they are all Republicans? WHOA!
Posted by: Yankee | November 2, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Marie- what does a black family, white family and an Asian family talking to each other have to do with Obama socializing our economy?
As you can tell people are learning to get a long with each other just fine without the government telling us to.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
“Powerful” is a metaphorical term, Michael. He doesn’t imply they’ll be equipped with Hellfire missles and the like. Think of trained eyes and ears on the streets, something true law enforcement officers would love to have on their side. Think of what our “government”–Republicans, Democrats, and all who stood together in a moment of unprecedented solidarity immediately following 9/11–asked the citizenry to do. They asked us to keep vigilant, they promised us they’d beef up border crossings, nuclear plants, ports; and they asked us to do our part. But instead of seeing just how “powerful” eyes and ears are, you’re running a conspiracy campaign to stoke fear. Again…I’m a cop and I can tell you we need far better security against drugs, illegal prescription medications of dubious quality brought in from third-world countries, and God knows what else that are smuggled in from freighters from all over the world. Government can’t do it alone and to employ additional help–which increases pride among citizens among other benefits–is an idea that could be put to use. Could there be “bad apples” that join such a force? Of course…such a force is but a microcosm of the population as a whole, but we could use the overwhelming talent many Americans of all walks of life could bring to the table. But somehow, in your mind, it’s all negative because Obama is going to use it to take over the world and take away your guns, and blah, blah, blah. Do you realize how paranoid you sound?
Posted by: Deputy_Bob | November 2, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Deputy_Bob – do you realize how gullible you sound? Obama didn’t say a powerful force as in eyes and ears. He was talking about firepower. Otherwise he would have compared them to the CIA or FBI instead of the military.
Drugs = DEA and Local Police. Why doesn’t he talk about funding them more? Do we need a new agency to duplicate their effort?
There are already government agencies to handle all of the problems you discuss. Why recreate the wheel if that is really what he is discussing? (It’s not even close to what he said though).
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Voter in America,
I’m not debating the BAD in McCain… I’m debating his logic and attitude. And if that seems BAD – well then maybe it’s because it is.
I deduce that he seems to care more about corporations than he does the masses/the people?
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Jwench,
Here are the answers you need.
1. At the City gov’t level, you have City Police
2. At the COUNTY gov’t level, you have SHERIFF and his deputies
3. At the STATE gov’t level, you have STATE police and National Guards
4. At the NATIONAL gov’t level, you have FBI
Best of ALL, Second Ammendment AUTHORIZED you to have your OWN GUNS for your defense.
Now, tell me again, WHY do we NEED a NATIONAL CIVILIAN SECURITY FORCE?
If you OLD enough, you will remember WHAT HITLER did with his.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Deputy Bob
All that blah, blah, blah is serious if you look at how Obama voted and listen to what he has said about the subject.
Posted by: 48 for a threepeat | November 2, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Marie – you do realize that corporations are made up of people right?
Corporations and individuals are what creates and generates all wealth in this country.
Regardless of what Obama thinks wealth does not come from the government.
His rhetoric proves he has no idea how our economy works:
“At a moment like this, the last thing we can afford is four more years of the tired, worn-out, old theory — that says — that says we should give more to billionaires and big corporations and hope that prosperity trickles down on everybody else.”
Does Barack Obama not understand that lowering taxes is NOT giving wealth away but it is TAKING less? Where does he think the wealth of our country comes from? Surely, not the government. The government produces zero wealth therefor it has nothing to give.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Michael,
It has nothing to do with that! (However, it is funny to me that out of all which I spoke about – you only focused on the Black, White and Asian portion…)
The point was on Capitalism – and how it divides. Our country IS SOOOO divided and money (and an attitude of privilege)is the cause of it! “For the love of money IS THE ROOT of all evil”
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Michael,
Yes – corporations employ people, but the ratio of focus and concern can’t be 70/30! And that’s what McCain’s focus seems to be to me. He care about corp’s 70% and people/employees 30%.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Here’s what Obama will do for you.
1. Flip Flop on promised tax cut like Clinton also promised because the economy is in crisis.
2. Raise capital gains taxes which will also impact the profit you make on your home should it sell in this bad economy, right now there is no tax unless it is over 500k if married.
3. Raise social security taxes you pay in from your paycheck and your employer matches, hurting business’s.
4. Raise the Estate taxes so you don’t get to keep ALL your inheritance.
5. Spend, spend, spend which will increase the deficit.
6. Higher taxes for business’s which will force lay off’s to offset them or send jobs overseas.
7. Pull out of Iraq before they can take care of themselves and sitting down with terrorists without pre-conditions.
8. Spread the wealth, give welfare checks to those that do not pay federal income tax from those that work hard for their money, taking away the american dream of prosperity.
9. Take your 2nd amendment rights away, the right to bear arms.
10. Socialized medicine, basically a cattle call with no choice of qualified or experienced doctors.
This is just the tip of the iceberg. If you don’t like McCain sometimes you have to choose who will do the least harm to America.
Posted by: HH | November 2, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
The President is a figurehead. The think tanks draw up policy and the politicians implement them, the President is totally out of the loop. He’s just there to sign the bill into law. He has NO imput, he does what he is told. Period.
Posted by: hmn | November 2, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Michael,
Yes – corporations employ people, but the ratio of focus and concern can’t be 70/30! And that’s what McCain’s focus seems to be to me.
He cares about businesses 70% and people/employees 30%.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Marie -If you didn’t want me to focus on the racial discussion then what was the point of bringing it up? If I was describing the same situation I would have said me and some of my neighbors had a bbq. I wouldn’t find it necessary to point out their race.
Capitalism doesn’t divide us. Socialism does.
What do you think class warfare is? What do you think Obama has been doing? He talks about the middle class and the wealthy constantly. He drives a wedge between the population. He has literally made half of the American population jealous enough to vote their selves a raise from the other halfs pockets.
THAT is division
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Reinventing the wheel? Hardly…the wheel works. Our “war on drugs” and other money pits do not. We need to try something new.
But hey…I’m obviously not going to convince any of you conspiracy theorists of anything here. I guess trying something new isn’t easy for some people–like my 98-year-old grandmother who’s had the same pictures on her walls, the same wallpaper, and the same carpeting–which is literally rotting away–for the past four decades. Nope. Change is bad.
Whatever…
Posted by: Deputy_Bob | November 2, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Michael,
Our system is set up to favor businesses – not people (shoot, the number of lobbyists up in Washington prove that).
Big government is not the problem (although I’d rather it be smaller). No, BIG BUSINESS is the problem…
Big business is what’s screwing us. I vaguely recall a footnote in that bailout bill that made provisions for “manufacturers of wooden arrows” (children’s toys)… Sheesh, give me a break!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Marie,
Since you revealed two things based on your posts.
First, you are BLACK.
Second, you are CHRISTIAN.
If you vote/support Obama because of his race, then I really feel bad for you.(Judge the man by the contents his characters, not by his color (MLK))
If you vote/support Obama as a Christian, then I am really disappointed in you.(Life is sanctity, abortion is AGAINST God’s wills)
“I deduce that he seems to care more about corporations than he does the masses/the people?”
About McCain for corporations than for people. Well, you see we live in the country where corporations create jobs for the people. That’s the incentive. You can be a corporation if you want to. a small business is a corporation, mom and pop deli is a corporation as long as they are creating jobs for the people to work and enjoy the fruits of their labor. Isn’t that America is all about?
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
You don’t think big government is responsible for the current mess?
Read the following summary from Investors Business Daily that details how the mortgage crisis happened:
http://epaper.investors.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=SUJELzIwMDgvMTAvMzAjQXIwMDEwMA==&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom-ibd
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
If McCain and Palin obtain the top job of this land they will be the best uniters ever. They will bring people of very different political persuasions together and give cause to unite in a common effort. There will be places where large numbers of Americans gather together as one. Places such as unemployment offices, pawn shops, consignment shops and soup lines. But don’t concern yourself if you are rich, you won’t have to pay any taxes and may even receive government subsidies. Smucks like us on SS and families making less than 250 grand a year will bear that obligation.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | November 2, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Michael,
I used it to illustrate a point on people with differences coming together! I used physical differences because it was apparent. I could’ve said, “Two Republican’s and Democrat” or “One rich person, one middle class, and one poor…” but those “differences” weren’t apparent….
Also, talking about “classes” doesn’t create a divide!! And besides, don’t you know that the effects of capitalism is a “class” system?? That’s all this nation has ever been…
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
“don’t you know that the effects of capitalism is a “class” system?? That’s all this nation has ever been”
Right, that is why the people from the “classless society” of Cuba risk their lives crossing 90 miles in the Atlantic to get here.
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Deputy_Bob,
Change is ONLY good when it benefits.
CHANGE for the SAKE of CHANGE is wasteful!
You failed to recognize that the responsibilty remains at the FAMILY UNIT. Think about it.
If you don’t educate your kids about the DANGER of drugs, then they may involve.
If you don’t teach them that STEALING is WRONG, then they will steal.
If EVERY FAMILY is responsible for their children behavior, we would NOT SPEND so much money to prosecute, incarcerate, feed these people (BAD ones) then YOU would not need a national civilian security force to help you do your job. Right Deputy Bob?
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Oh my gosh, give me a break.
I’ll tell, I didn’t vote for Obama because he was Black (a statement I sincerely detest!) any more than I voted for Bush 4 years ago because he was White.
But I’ll tell you what though – I’ll never vote for someone because of how they stand on JUST ONE ISSUE ever again (as I did with BUSH 4 years ago because of his stance on abortion!). I’ll never do that again.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Michael,
I realize some people risk their lives to flee Cuba to come here… I also understand that some people are very happy and proud to be living in Cuba. What’s your point?
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Marie…
you want to know what makes McCain appealing…not a lot…with the possible exceptions as follows:
1. Obama has been in the Senate two years and voted “present” or “here” one time too many…one time is too many. What’s wrong with voting a straight yes or no? Is that not what he was sent to the Senate for…to represent the people who elected him? Do they like non-committal votes?
2. Obama and his campaign are setting him up as the new Messiah who will change the world…Sorry, the Messiah “ain’t” him and I have a BIG problem with his Christianity if he keeps this up. He, unfortunately reminds me of Svengali or Nicolae.
3. His past and present associations are blatant Marxist/Communist and a lot of people around the world died trying to stop the spread of Communism. Communism is only another form of dictatorship with no real “spreading of the wealth”.
4. Too much secretiveness on Obama’s part. Why? Why not release college papers, grades, work history? Is not what’s good for one candidate, good for the other? What happened in the 20+ years for which he has not accounted? Does he have something to hide? As a candidate running for the office of President of the USA, nothing about his schooling, work history, associations (to whom does he owe his alligiance), finances(is he a wise steward) (not his wife’s if separate)should be open to view. These are things that go into the process of making a wise choice for the job of President.
5. How could he associate with people who have praised the killer of Robert Kennedy? Why do the Kennedy’s continue to endorse him? Can the Kennedy’s not admit mistakes and change directions? I would think the Kennedy family would change their endorsement. YES, you are know by the company you keep.
6. Obama wants to have his own military force…WHY? Would that be Constitutional? Oh, I forgot, he wants to change the Constitution and appoint judges who will use other countries laws to make judgments. How can he then stand (if he wins) and truthfully say he will preserve, protect and defend the Constitution? There are a lot of things that need changing, but the Constitution is not one of them. Just apply it as it was intended. The two areas that needed changing have been changed…no slavery and granting all people access to the privilege of voting.
7. What has his past experience shown as to his qualifications to run this Country? I still like to call the USA the greatest nation in the world, even with all it’s warts? He talks a good game and looks like a movie star, but his walk and his talk do not match.
Posted by: carrot | November 2, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Some people like Cuba – some people don’t. Just because those who don’t try to come to the USA doesn’t mean our system is “the best” or even “better” in some areas in comparison…
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
LANNY EDWARDS
“But don’t concern yourself if you are rich, you won’t have to pay any taxes and may even receive government subsidies. Smucks like us on SS and families making less than 250 grand a year will bear that obligation.”
Are you saying that rich people don’t pay taxes?
Obama’s plan changed from 250,000 to 200,000 to 150,000 to 120,000 to 42,000.
So basically, we all will bear the tax burden.
I am NOT rich by any measure but I pay my share of taxes.
However, there is 40% pay NO taxes.
That leaves 60% to pay taxes.
I belong to that 60% category and I pay taxes to sustain the gov’t.
BTW, if you are on SS and making less 250,000 you are doing very WELL.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Marie,
“Oh my gosh, give me a break.
I’ll tell, I didn’t vote for Obama because he was Black (a statement I sincerely detest!) any more than I voted for Bush 4 years ago because he was White.
But I’ll tell you what though – I’ll never vote for someone because of how they stand on JUST ONE ISSUE ever again (as I did with BUSH 4 years ago because of his stance on abortion!). I’ll never do that again.”
So, WHAT exactly do you stand for?
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Carrot,
The numbers of years a person holds in a position does not equate to “competency” (as is evident in McCain’s campaign and Bush’s terms in office). Obama’s accomplishments in school and community prove his competence.
As for his voting “present” – do you understand what they do with those bills in the Senate and Congress? They put on so many caveats and additions (as was evidenced in the Bailout Bill with those wooden arrows, for example) that it’s not impossible to understand why he would do that.
Also, whenever talking about associations I can’t help but think about those nasty (and costly) one’s he had early on in his career (Keating), not to mention his infidelity record, NOT TO MENTION McCain’s father’s influence and connections in the political areana as well. His family has age old ties that Heaven only knows what dirt is attached to it. Also, didn’t he give a large amount of money to the most recent guy (Kahlide?) they’re trying to connect Obama to?
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Voter in America,
What? In regard to abortion?
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Voter in America:
My comment was an exaggerated point, something similar to Palin and McCain infomercials, only my comment had a ring of truth to it. Lighten up a little. Have yourself a nice day.
Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | November 2, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“Voter in America,
What? In regard to abortion?”
You said you would not vote for someone because of his stand on JUST ONE ISSUE.
So, you are willing to COMPROMISE your belief to vote for someone whose belief and yours are DIFFERENT such as ABORTION. In other words, you would vote for someone with issues you agree with eventhough you are AGAINST ABORTION!
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
LANNY EDWARDS,
You, too! Smuckaroo!
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
See, this is what you don’t understand “Voter in America” – there is no “compromising” going on!
If I agree with one candidate on 2 out of 10 issues, and agree with the other candidate on 7 out of 10 issues – I’m going to go for the latter.
Many call that weighing the lesser of the two evils…
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
And before you “go there” – that’s just an expression… I’m not calling either candidate evil.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Marie,
“If I agree with one candidate on 2 out of 10 issues, and agree with the other candidate on 7 out of 10 issues – I’m going to go for the latter.”
How is that NOT compromising?
This is where you and I differ.
I stand FIRM on my belief no matter WHAT.
If a candidate supports ABORTION, then I will NOT vote for him period.
Posted by: Voter In America | November 2, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Voter in America,
Compromise (as defined in Merriam-Webster) is:
a settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions.
I have not done that! I have not “consented” and changed my views on abortion!
Also, I am intelligent enough to know that we live in a democracy and how ONE PERSON stands on one issue does not make it law!
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
No settlement (on abortion) has been reached just because I vote for Obama.
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Half of America beleive that Obama has use
mind control sees it as an intensified and persistent use of well researched social psychology principles like compliance, conformity, persuasion, dissonance, reactance, framing or emotional manipulation.
“Mind control is the process by which individual or collective freedom of choice and action is compromised by agents or agencies that modify or distort perception, motivation, affect, cognition and/or behavioral outcomes. It is neither magical nor mystical, but a process that involves a set of basic social psychological principles.”
mind control is possible through the covert exploitation of the unconscious rules that underlie and facilitate healthy human
social interactions. He states that common social rules can be used to prey upon the unwary, and he titles them as follows,
Reciprocation: The Old Give and Take…and Take
Commitment and Consistency: Hobgoblins of the Mind
Social Proof: Truths Are Us
Liking: The Friendly Thief
Authority: Directed Deference
Scarcity: The Rule of the Few
This is much different and far less devastating than that which you are able to achieve with the improvements of coercive persuasion. With coercive persuasion you can change people’s attitudes without their knowledge and volition. You can create new “attitudes” where they will do things willingly which they formerly may have detested, things which previously only torture, physical pain, or drugs could have coerced them to do.
Just Words No, Words can be used as a powerful tool to unsuspecting people.
Charismatic Speeches, Propaganda, Catch phrases and slogans, Staged shows and gatherings, Constant Intense Advertising via every means possible to man.
Well Defined program, step by step, Planned out and implemented. High tense Constant stimuli. Conformity to the cause. Unsuspecting crowd, people unaware of the mind changing effects on them.
Most will not be able to admit they were had, or used. many never realizing.
Take some time, Reflect back over your life. You Family, your beliefs you grew up with. Gain back the rationalization of being able to make clear decisions on what you have known, not what you have been lead to beleive.
Mr Obama can not keep up the Billion Dollar Campaign. The Money will run out and his ability to market himself and advertise will cease.
He all ready is planning how he will let you down, with out you crashing out, going from euphirua to despair.
Shows He knows he can not and probably never was going to be able to give you those Glorious Promises and Better life he promised you.
He pumped you up, Played your feelings and thoughts to get you to vote for him.
For his reasons, not yours.
It is Ok to say NO, It is OK to get upset with him.
I know I am, he used me and tried to take advantage of me. he spent a billion dollars selling himself as something he is not, and play my mind and confuse me. With those Constant ads and
I have Rights, Freedoms and my free will and it does not belong to him.
He is an uncaring, Egotistical, self centered person.
I am an American who will not be used, exploited or abused.
Posted by: seah5 | November 2, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Voter In America,
Honestly – this blog banter between us is exactly what’s wrong with this country – We sit and focus on our differences (as you tried to make an argument for in your previous post) instead of focusing on what we agree on. We should use our desired outcome as the foundation on which to stand and build on!
You and I are opposed to abortion (shoot, even Obama during a debate stated, “Nobody likes the idea of abortion.”) We all love our country, and everyone wants to be happy… let’s stop focusing on “differences”
Posted by: Marie | November 2, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
More of Obama’s craziness is slipping out. Obama, says his plan will bankrupt coal plants across the country. What is this man thinking? Honestly, his plan will put thousands of people across coal producing states (PA and VA specificall) out of a job in the name of Al Gore’s “global warming” hoax. This insanity has to be stopped!
http://www.middleofright.com/2008/11/obama-says-he-will-bankrupt-coal.html
Posted by: Michael | November 2, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
The REPUBLICANS are good at TRICKERY and FIXING ELECTIONS!!!! Just go to hackingdemocracy.com
Posted by: johnzenia | November 3, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Go McCain / Palin 08 ! I have hope that they will win. Obama is the worst thing that could happen to this country! Be scared people! If Obama wins, God help us all!!!
FOR MCCAIN ALL THE WAY!! NO BULL!
Posted by: Stephanie | November 3, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I think the politics of fear is silly. Sadly too many ill informed use that as justification.
Posted by: TakingPictures | November 3, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
After all the emails, ads, speeches, and so on, the obvious choice? Ron Paul. McCain would be satisfactory. Obama, not the man many think him to be. I am proud to be a citizen of these United States during all of my 47 years. I salute my flag in respect to those who serve our country and have served our country. Our country will struggle until we are more than Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and whatever else. Be Americans first! Cross party lines, be who the people elected you to be and not just a puppet that goes where the money is or follows where it leads you. God Bless America.
Posted by: Roger | November 4, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
When I was voting this poll worker tried to make me vote for McCain.
I had told her it was my first time voting and she brought me to the page where I had to choose which party Im gonna go for and she was like “Go ahead, click on the first one. Go ahead click it.” It was the Republican party. I was like “Uhhh but Im not voting for McCain” and she said “oh well then whatever”.
~*Nikki*~
Posted by: niki | November 4, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Why don’t Obama do something about the economy? It’s been a month now and things are still bad. I need some cash, man. I mean, he fixed gas prices, ok, but other things are still bad, you know what I’m sayin? What is he doing up there? Come on, bro!
Posted by: tremaine | December 7, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm