By Dschabner

Nov 9, 2008 9:16pm

Election Over, Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan Emerge

In case you care…

"For nine months, I kept quiet," Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said today at Mosque Maryam in Chicago, "because I saw that the good words that I spoke about this beautiful young man" — President-elect Obama — "at our Saviours’ Day convention and the way they were misused. I decided it would be better for me to just be quiet rather than be drawn into the controversy that was swirling around his pastor, Father Pfleger, and others."

"I feel freer today to say the things that are in my heart," said the controversial religious leader.

For a limited time Farrakhan’s sermon can be viewed HERE.

Last week, Obama’s former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright emerged to speak at Kingdom Life Christian Church sponsored by the Theological Education Institute of Hartford.

"The world doesn’t know about my 41 years of ministry, or my writing of books, because it was all taken down to a 10-second sound bite that the media chose to show about a sermon that was delivered seven years ago," Wright said. "The media didn’t care about the whole sermon and what it was about. They just used those 10 seconds and used it as a weapon of mass destruction against [Obama's] campaign."

And on election day, education professor William Ayers, a former member of the violent radical group the Weather Underground, gave an interview to the New Yorker’s David Remnick.

Ayers told Remnick that he knew Obama only slightly: “I think my relationship with Obama was probably like that of thousands of others in Chicago and, like millions and millions of others, I wished I knew him better.” He described what happened to him as "Swift-boating."

“It’s all guilt by association,” Ayers said. “They made me into a cartoon character — they threw me up onstage just to pummel me."

Ron Radosh takes issue with some of the assertions Ayers makes HERE.

- jpt

User Comments

Hey, Ron Radosh, jealous much?
Heh

Posted by: Flash Override | November 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Cue the right-wing paranoid fantasists in … 3 … 2 … 1 …

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Thank God they had the self control and selflessness to not allow themselves to be continually used as weapons against Barack.If the media really cared they would have played the entire sermon where Jeremiah was quoting a white man in that piece that Barack’s advesaries used to try and stop his campaign.

Posted by: TV | November 9, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I’d thank God I’m 70 years old, except I’m an atheist, so who do I thank?!

Posted by: Rhys | November 9, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Another thing. Black men are complex because of the world we live in, the struggles we’ve endured and to be more specific, because of the expectations from others.

Posted by: TV | November 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Stand by for every right wing nut job to come out and attack PRESIDENT ELECT OBAMA for just what was said by Farrakhan,Wright and Ayers, I mean he can’t win no matter what. He is not in control of people and what they say.But Hannity,Rush,Savage don’t get that and now all of the hate mongers are going to be stired up because Farrakhan,Wright and Ayers commented on this matter.PRESIDENT ELECT OBAMA is not RESPONSIBILE for their Comments.

Posted by: KWOLF443 | November 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

As a POW McCain collaborated
with the North Vietnamese
for five years. The classified
information he divulged helped
them shoot down more planes
with greater accuracy.

Posted by: anon | November 9, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

This is what I love about America. Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan all have a perfect right to have their own opinion and the perfect right to express it. I love how the neocons peg them as unAmerican for expressing their opinions.

Posted by: democratic | November 9, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

The Rev Wrights famous comments,William Ayers actions, and the sick perverted views of Farrkhan are not acceptable under any circumstances.
They are not any more acceptable now than they were before the election.
What is ironic to me is that all of these evil men have 10 x’s more money than any of you who find them acceptable. The Rev has a 10 million dollar line of credit. That church must not have anyone who won’t have to pay more taxes under the Obama tax plan.

Posted by: Strephano | November 9, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

As usual the media extracts a sound bite that is out of context and out to bread controversy. the Media. This is not freedom of the press, it is malicious gossip syndicated.

Posted by: POed | November 9, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

I forced myself to watch the entire Wright sermon, and I didn’t feel any better about than I did after seeing the snippet. As for Ayers, I think he’s more interestedin indoctrination than education, or as he put it in Venezuela, “Education is the motor force of revolution.”

Posted by: ed_bernays | November 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

wow….these republicans are bad losers…..lets hope they dont act out their parinoid frustrations with violence like they have in the past……

Posted by: wm musson | November 9, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

What’s up with the media bashing? Are the citizens of this country too lazy or immature to double check the facts? Apparently both sides are satisfied with the sound bites that American media serves them without taking the few minutes to research the information and think for themselves. Farrahkan, Wright, and Ayers are American heros. They dared to speak out against injustice, and are willing to fight against it. At best, most Americans politely demure and wait for someone else to tackle the issues, and deliver a sound bite. Then all they have left to do is parrot it back in “water cooler” conversation and pretend that they’re passionate about it. Pathetic.

Posted by: Mark | November 9, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Um, inflammatory comments are not the same thing as bombs. Can we have a mandatory reading of the First Amendment before posting comments please?

Posted by: Mary | November 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Interesting that Ayers doesn’t refute the charge that he had a fundraiser for Obama at his house nor is it even asked if Obama was there.

Posted by: toby hill | November 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Do any of you know anything about the weather underground ? They were doing what your founding fathers woud have encouraged them to do. You had a Government out of control, a criminal president who was acting with utter contempt for the will of the people, killing university students & anyone else who tried to protest. Sanctioned murder by the C.I.A, do I have to go on ? The W U never killed anyone, they made sure every buildings were un-occupied when they blew them up. Militant civil disobediance is a far cry from wanton terroism which aims to deliberately kill the innocent. If young peope today had the balls that the W U had, you probably would not be in the mess your in now.

Posted by: brian dillon | November 9, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Each of these men have been significant in what they have contributed to our society. In the Vietnam era it was the voices of loud protests, including mothers of draft age sons, taking to the streets and screaming “No More”. Other protesters used various means to get heard as did Ayers and the Weathermen. All of those protests including Ayers made a difference and ultimately, of course, the U.S.pulled out of Vietnam, because the people would not stand for it any more (much like now).
Although I am less familiar with Wright’s and Farakahn’s contributions, it is obvious that both the long ministry of Wright devoted to his community and the work of Farakahn to unite a fractured African-American community are both admirable.
It is good that they can come forth now and speak their minds about Obama’s victory. It was also wise that they did not come out before (that was good judgment).

Posted by: chrys | November 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

See you all in the souplines come February !

Posted by: FuldaVet | November 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Reverend Wright’s rants are
no big deal. It is not illegal
to fulminate against slavery,
discrimination and injustice,
past or present, real or
imaginary. Pastors talk that
way in churches calling upon
God to make things right.

Posted by: anon | November 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

democrat: Ayers, Farrakhan, Obama and Wright did not like America. Who are you kidding. If Ayers lived in Cuba and did that you know what would happen to him. Castro did not put up with anything that would destroy his country. We were too soft on Ayers and those who speak out against this country. And if you think their right then join them and all of you get the heck out of this country. Hamas wont’s to talk to Obama, go live in his country.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

What people seem to forget is the Weather Underground never intentionally bombed one human being–and destruction of property seemed to many, in what seemed a hopeless struggle to end the evil and murderous Vietnam War, a proportionately small crime. What people also forget is how many are dying or will die as the result of the corporate greed that resulted in this financial bailout–unless people can push Obama’s team to seriously channel the nation’s wealth to those who unfairly lack participation in it.

Posted by: Polly | November 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

I hear that OReilly, Hannity, and Limbaugh have secret tunnels between each of their homes and they conduct secret meetings with plans to overthrow the country. Also, McCain once talked to a communist. Actually, I hear he’s talked to a number of communists over a 5 year period at least. He has never mentioned this, so it’s obvious he’s also a communist. And since OReilly, Hannity, and LImbaugh all supported McCain, they gotta be communists too!
THAT’S why they have tunnels between their homes!
Wow. hard to believe that neocons are actually communists trying to take over America! It’s a good thing Obama won. We otherwise would have been taken over by communists from Russia and China. I hear that this was their conspiracy, and the real reason why Cheney spent so much time in Georgia!!!!!

Posted by: ro | November 9, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Judgment is coming and there will be nothing you can do to stop it.

Posted by: Dave | November 9, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Lets face facts. America voted that it is more comfortable with Farrakhan, Ayres and Wright than Bush, Cheney and McCain.
The people have spoken.

Posted by: Flash Override | November 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Hopefully, we will get our $1000 before XMas. Our Greatest Leader is working hard, you know, it’s hard-work, with the Congress to fulfill his promise of rewarding us for voting for him. The new stimulus is coming any time now. It did not save the economy the first time, tanking it only by 50%, but it will do better this time. Him We Believe In!
Long Live our Greatest Dearest Leader, Comrade 0bama!

Posted by: expecting | November 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Too bad, Mr. Rezko is in the Big House, or he would have helped with the White House.

Posted by: Americans 1 | November 9, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I’m waiting to see who will come out of the woodwork to say they kept quiet so as not to hurt the Republican campaign. Uuuuh, Bush?

Posted by: Shockolit | November 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

JN: Ayers was an American citizen of this country. Has nothing to do with other countries. People never protested World War ll like the crazy people going around screaming and yelling over the Viet Nam war. If JFK had lived the war would have gone on longer. Why didn’t the protesting go on when JFK was alive? When the war first started.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Did you vote for Bush even though he has a criminal record? Coke and DUIs ring a bell? Why do you think Obama is more likely to have a criminal history???… because he’s black?
Posted by: Reality Bites | Nov 9, 2008 10:39:27 PM
======
Mr. Reality Bites,
In case you are either blind who does not read his inspirational books for you, or deft who never heard of it from Mr. Matthews, the tinkle-man of admiration, 0bama admits he is a cocaine user.

Posted by: Coke too | November 9, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

*Pepitone (great name btw..)
Yeah, just so you know, charges were finally filed this year in connection with the murder of Sgt Mconnell in SF 1971 and Ayers wasn’t one of them – you should note, the reason Ayers charges were dismissed during his trial was because NIXON’S attorney general, also convicted in Watergate, illegally wiretapped ayers, opened his mail, and did all kinds of illegal crap which got the case thrown out – the same stuff, btw, which Bush has been doing lately, just another example of how our country has gone backwards since this moron became our POTUS – thank god we’ll have someone in office with an above average (or even average) I.Q. from now on..
paul s.
maplewood, NJ

Posted by: paul serr | November 9, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

brian dillon. You are so wrong. They were taking people off the street and having them sign up with no identification such as MICKEY MOUSE. Or don’t you remember that. There were 200,000 applications that Acorn was told to turn over and the reason that woman went took it to the supreme court she knew those applications were phony. I watched the news every single day. It was happening in fifteen states. And Obama didn’t mastermind his campaign he had several people working for him from Clinton’s administration. That’s who masterminded the campaign like they did for Clinton. These are the same people that turned their back on Hillary.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

How many times are we going to go down this road?
This has been going on for forty years and it is enough. We are going to go ahead and move forward without you guys if you don’t mind. Each side has points worth advocating, but the vitriol is useless. Ayers through his actions and Wright and Farrakhan from the pulpit allowed passion to cloud their otherwise worthwhile pursuits. Ending the Vietnam war and racial justice are important, but these guys lose their ability to build consensus with these inflammatory positions. Hey, we need to sometimes make people uncomfortable and press issues but now is the time to unite. With that I’ll leave it Bob Marley from his “Get Up, Stand Up”
We’re sick and tired of you ism-skism games….

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Marianne: “Why didn’t the protesting go on when JFK was alive? When the war first started.”
***************
Because in the early 1960s the nation was shocked by the rapid expansion of Communism around the world. At that time, most of the nation supported JFK. But the war dragged on. People began to question the “Domino Theory” and America’s right to unilaterally meddle in another country’s civil war. By Nixon the majority of the country was against the war. If the neocons had learned from history, they would have known Iraq would be a quagmire and that America doesn’t have the will to sheriff the world. But the arrogance in the white house believed they had all the answers.

Posted by: Able | November 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

wm musson: you mean like the WU?
wow….these republicans are bad losers…..lets hope they dont act out their parinoid frustrations with violence like they have in the past……
Posted by: wm musson | Nov 9, 2008 10:13:09 PM

Posted by: Bob | November 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Coke, I’m sure you sit in your right-wing nut job smugness thinking you scored a point on me or something, but your post is nearly unintelligible and has nothing to do with what I was saying. I know that Obama has admitted to drug use. What I also know is that he was never arrested and prosecuted like Bush was. He never got caught with a DUI, endangering the lives of others.
And admitting you tried cocaine in college is not the same as “being a cocaine user.” I didn’t call Bush a drunk now, did I?
What I’m saying is that it’s a big step saying that “stupid” college kids would vote for Obama if he had a criminal record when he doesn’t. But the person Mariann put in our White House right now does. Unless she voted for Kerry.

Posted by: Reality Bites Back | November 9, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Coming people, the election is over. McCain and Obama have made up and moved on. They are both up to bigger things than rehashing the election campaign.
Time to take on something bigger than bashing each other and anyone else for that matter.

Posted by: Richard | November 9, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Paul Serr: If you think Obama is above average that’s your opinion but everyone doesn’t agree to it. Its this generation of young people that the news media said who is ruining this country. They are people that think like you. Like I said Obama could have a prison record and these nitwits would vote for him anyway. They have no concept of what is best for the country because they are caught up in their own little world of drugs, booze and sex. You have to worry about the big tax increase I don’t because I don’t have to work. But all the people of this country are going to get a tax increase and it will be the same for everyone. He isn’t president yet but wait until the downfall comes. I can just see Nancy Pelosi telling Emanuel what to do.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Wright really has made some fairly strong comments. Thank god real Christians like Robertson, Dobson and Falwell have never engaged in any questionable speech.

Posted by: Buck Roger | November 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

ACORN is required by law to turn in all of the names they register. They attempt to police this by flagging the fakes they find. The flag the whole list from the submitter of a questionable name. One right wing nut in the registration office took THEIR list and turned it over to the media. It was HIS responsibility to remove the names THEY identified. But he would rather have made Fox than facts.

Posted by: ralph | November 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

For the “man of change,” everything old is new again. The President-Elect has never been anything more than a great marketeer. He’ll repackage the ideas of Ayers, Wright and Rev. Farrakhan and you will swallow it and like it and say “Gee, this is new!” Shame on you. In the end, you cared nothing for your country. You simply fell in love with a flim-flam man and made yourselves believe you were part of “history.” He’s like all the rest, except he’s worse. Because he made you believe he was something different.

Posted by: Mandelay3 | November 9, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Emanuel and Obama’s uniting:
Less than reputable people will tell you what they want you to hear until you sign on the dotted line, then comes the fine print and buyers remorse. Rahm Emanuel is perhaps the most hot-headed attack dog in congress, and one of the most non-partisan. He doesn’t represent what Obama promised about uniting at all. Read the Wikipedia entry on Emanuel, which describes where he stabbed a steak knife into the a table shouting “dead, dead” after rattling off names of people he disagreed with. He’s another thug from the Chicago political machine.
.

Posted by: Billw3 | November 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

nogaffin
Then I see you agree with me that even Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan have a right to be here in America and to voice their opinions since we live in a Republic.
Your welcome.

Posted by: democratic | November 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Obama was elected by democrats, moderates and REPUBLICANS, – blacks, whites and hispanics. Mostly because none of his speeches sounded anything like what is posted in the above comments. Nuts are on boths extremes, and the rest of us meet in the middle.

Posted by: TD | November 9, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Ms Pepitone,
I am a registered Republican, I voted for Obama. What is it in the last eight years that made you so sure that we would want eight more? Please tell me. Was it the largest expansion of government since WWII? The Prescription Drug Bill? The largest deficits in our history? Our success in getting those who attacked us? Katrina being managed by a horseshow promoter? The Constitution being trampled? No Child Left Behind? Please for the love of God tell me, because as a Republican I want good governance, that is all. No more of this crap. Democrat, Republican, Indies, I just want someone with a brain who cares about effective government. That makes me PrObama.

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Some history here.
JFK opposed military expansion in Vietnam. Johnson oversaw the buildup there. Johnson was also cared for by a military hero we now know as Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Get over the B.S. and learn the truth. When you do it will be easy to support President Obama.

Posted by: keith Newman | November 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

strephano: I definately agree with you. Your right, Obama will probably lower their taxes. And those that find these people acceptable are in the same class as they are. They don’t have any respect for this country but they like living here. And Ayers bombing the NYC Police Station. Now, what did that police station have to do with the war in Viet Nam. I also understand by one of the FBI men that was interviewed he went to SF and bombed there too. Ayers, Farrakhan and Wright all need a good lesson plus Father P. after the statement he made about Hillary Clinton. I believe there will be trouble in paradise not long after he gets in. And Emanuel does not like the Palastinians because he is Jewish and Obama is good friends with Hamas. What a mess that’s going to be.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Guess who is not getting elected for a 2nd term.

Posted by: JQPublic | November 9, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

“There are none so blind as those who will not see.” George W. Bush foisted his “preemptive war” policy on the American people. Essentially that doctrine says you’re entitled to go ahead and attack someone if you think they might attack you. Under that doctrine Iraq had a right to attack the U.S., but didn’t do so. George W. Bush lied retail and wholesale to the American people so he could go to war. He told his biographer (who was canned when Bush found out he intended to tell the truth) that you had to be in a war to get the authority and power to make real changes. He then made sure to get us into a war. He is the antithesis of a CHristian, even though he claims to be one. He started a war (no, Iraq did not have WMD and was not in league with Al-Quaeda), lied to the electorate, got rid of the Clinton surplus, created the biggest deficits ever, cut aid to the poor, increased aid to the rich, deregulated the economy until it fell apart, spied on Americans, did away with habeas corpus, encouraged torture, refused to ever admit mistakes, refused to tell the truth about his drug use, and so on, ad (literally) nauseam. After George W. Bush, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, or Louis Farrakhan woudl have been a better choice than someone like McCain who would have given us four more years of Bush policies. Many of the posts here seem to say or imply that it is treasonous to be around people who don’t agree with Bush’s neofascist agenda. George W. Bush was, without a doubt, the worst president the U.S. has ever had. Anything will be an improvement.

Posted by: R Musick | November 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

JQPublic: “Guess who is not getting elected for a 2nd term.”
*************
Just curious — how good were you at predicting this election?

Posted by: Able | November 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

stephen: I am a democrat that switched to republican to stay. I wouldn’t vote for any democrat dog and that’s what I am calling them. Did you vote for Bush when he was running for office. I voted for Kerry at that time. I didn’t want Bush to be elected but the majority of the people in this country did like the majority of the people voted for Obama. No, I would never vote for Obama. I do not like his associates, the church he belonged to and his dealings with Acorn the crooked voter’s organization. Now the people are licking their wounds for voting Bush in office. And they will be doing it again.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I predicted this one. :)

Posted by: JQPublic | November 9, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Ms Pepitone,
Who cares about what Bill Ayers did 40 years ago and it has absolutely nothing to do with Obama.
Listen carefully, I don’t like it if my taxes go up so long as it is used wisely. What you don’t understand is that is the feeling of most Americans. We the unwashed masses want a govenrnment that works. And to be honest, it is a shame that you cannot feel how refreshing this feels because it was never about dividing the country into half. Obama never spoke of a “real” America that you obviously feel that those different from you fail to represent. For the first time since President Nixon first divided us we are more than that. At least some of us. See you in the funny papers.

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I couldn’t agree more Fred – I couldn’t agree more. All of you should just shut up and mind your own business. Stop looking to the government to solve your problems and stop griping about things that you cannot change. Make the best of your lives with what you can accomplish on your own with your own two hands – you may think that someone is looking out for you (Bush or Obama, or other), but the truth is – you are all alone on this planet.

Posted by: Lemont | November 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

BillW3: You are absolutely right. I heard the same statement about Emanuel and the steak knife. He is very hot headed and believe me when I say that is one big mistake Obama made. Obama said he wanted change. Did he mean changing a white president to a black president. Why is he choosing people from Clinton’s administration. Because they are ten times more experienced in politics that he hasn’t learned yet. And I believe the reason he didn’t pick Hillary is because she would outshine him and knows more than he does. After Obama gets in office as president, that’s when it will all start.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

For those who are complaining about Obama potentially raising taxes, here are some numbers to think about.
The IRS issued a report on the 400 richest Americans and how much they paid in taxes in the year 2000. The top four taxpayers had a combined income of $69 billion, more than some countries make, in the year 2000. These individuals were on the receiving end of tax cuts in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The wealthiest .2% (about 250,000 households) saved almost $35 billion dollars in taxes. The top 20% of Americans saved just over $200 billion each year in taxes (Bush’s 2nd term taxes would have covered the “Bail Out” plan currently in action).
Why do we have a budget deficit? I’m not sure, but I think tax cuts for the richest of the rich might have played a part.

Posted by: Thinking Twin | November 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

how many of you can name GWB’s chief of staff? its ashame that EVERYTHING BHO does will be made into a front page story…….news flash news flash, Obama put the TP on air force one ply down ….ply down

Posted by: Mvpsdad | November 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Ms Pepitone, The question remains, What in the last eight years made you think that eight more years would have been a good idea? Oh that’s right, Sarah Palin, the last straw as I called her.
None other than Karl Rove after the election said that Obama ran to the middle, a pragmatist.

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Is everyone around here just a bunch of hate mongers? Somehow you believe Bush was good for the country? I am a twenty year military veteran, something most of you can’t claim.
I support Obama and believe he will help America become respected again. Many of you have never served your country and had the pleasure of being stationed in another country where they absolutely hate you.
Why? Because we have repressed people through economic slavery around the world, we remove sitting presidents in other countries because they disagree with our values and don’t agree with us. Of course we only do this to countries we can bully around like Panama and Iraq. Do you see us marching into China and taking over in the name of human rights? Do you even see us slowing the importation of cheap, counterfeit goods from China? No, because the truth is they have become OUR BANKERS and just like we impose our will on other countries through economic slavery, they are capable of doing the same to us. What do you think would happen if they terminated all trade with the US and asked for the trillions of dollars we owe them because we have never had a balanced budget in the last 45 years?
There are ample means to punish countries that we don’t like short of invasion. And if it were not for the interests of American companies we wouldn’t even bother with places like Iraq. Don’t believe it? Do you see us in Darfur saving anyone? We are in Iraq simply because Saddam would not cooperate and play ball. Haliburton is making a killing over there and when we are done with the “reconstruction” the people of Iraq will be bound to a debt to America that they can never repay, not to the government of America, but to the corporations that have invested there. These companies will economically enslave them to do their will or risk sanctions.
Chavez is one of the few that has stood up to America and it’s probably just a matter of time before he has an accident and passes on.
President Bush is considered a war criminal in Iraq. Do you think the American public would stand still if another country came in, grabbed him like we did to Noriega and Saddam, tried him and threw him in prison?
As a veteran, I can tell you that you achieve much more with diplomacy and respect of other countries than you will ever achieve with brute force. You may win the war, but you will never win the support of the people. There is a reason five years after Bush declared that the war was over we still have 130,000 troops in Iraq.
John McCain was a good man, a decorated war veteran that gave more to this country than most ever will, but he would never have the respect around the world that Obama will bring. McCain represented four more years that potentially could have even been worse than Bush.
Obama will never achieve all of his lofty goals, but then again no President ever does.

Posted by: Mark | November 9, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Mariann– I’m sorry you have such a low opinion of young people. In my large family my parents have 15 grandchildren, most between the ages of 15-30. All are hardworking, intelligent, honest and kind. Most, but not all, of the voting age folks in our family voted for Obama — grandchildren, parents, and grandparents. Our patriarch, my father, is a highly decorated, now-retired career military officer and veteran of three wars. So I don’t recognize the near-do-wells you describe as Obama supporters. We’re simply Americans who are concerned about the direction our country has been headed in and hoping for a better future. We will give president-elect Obama the benefit of the doubt until we learn whether he is up to the task.

Posted by: Able | November 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

stephen: This country will always be divided. The one’s that think they know so much in this country are this generation of young college students that are caught up in drugs and booze. Their brains aren’t working for them and its my understanding that many of them have to drop out. They are the ruination of this country. And even if it was 40 years ago Ayers still did it and killed three policemen and 2 other people in his bombing. And if you agree to that then why don’t you buy a house in Hyde Park next to him.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

President-Elect Obama needs to thank his “opponent – Hillary Campaign Team” for discing out all these associations during the primary. The issues were so thoroughly debated that there was really nothing left for GOP to gloat about. Still remember how Kerry being swiftboat on thing that pop up at the final days…
Good luck America and to my fairlady – Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Substance | November 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

The use of division, generating and fostering hate, etc. is not the answer to our country’s problems, or the world’s problems. What is needed is to find things that bring all of us togeather to find a way to work togeather. I see that as what our new president elect has been promoting. I believe that that is a great deal of why he won.
If anyone has a positive contribution to give, no matter what they have done in the past, I think should be welcomed. Or to say it another way to concentrate on hate and division IS part of the problem. Finding ways and things to get togeather IS part of the solution.

Posted by: CF | November 9, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

The good news is that my sister who just left for Europe didn’t have to bring Canadian sweatshirts, the world is proud of us again. They see us in a light that we haven’t shone in a while. Nice. Sleep tight…..

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Those poor men were used just like Sarah Palin used the uneducated at her rallies. They say they want small goverment but want to tell you what you can and can’t do with your body, control science and decide what books you can read…. LOL Republicans are a freaking joke to anyone with a brain but that may be why they don’t like educated people! LOL

Posted by: Grissom | November 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Just in case any of you are interested in who actually controls America and the world as a whole try this site and watch the video. It will give you a little clarity intoworld affairs and whats really at work.
I don’t subscribed to the Utopian dream the author believes in and mentions in the end, because in the end our fate will probably be decided long before any such transformation could take place, but I’ll tell you what, you owe it to yourselves to view it. And it puts Obama in the same category as Bush and most other Presidents. Just watch it!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912

Posted by: Mark | November 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Ms Pepitone, No this country will no longer be divided like it has been. We are going to grow up and act like adults. Those young people that you speak so poorly of are the ones whose lives are on the line for us in Iraq and Afghanistan, Their voice counts. Hispanics, blacks, gays, poor people and yes even ignorant people all get the vote, damn you Jefferson!
You count on division and I pray for a more perfect union, that is just the difference between you and me.

Posted by: stephen | November 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

I’m sorry. I miss the point of this article and its heading, “Election Over, Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan Emerge”.
Emerge like what? Freakish giants from Monster Island? I don’t get it.
3 people not on Obama’s payroll with opinions and the strength of character to represent them publicly in pursuit of change, whether approved or not.
Whether I agree with them or not is irrelevant. Group thinking, cowardly sycophants touting opinions and ideas that, miraculously, are in line with everyone else’s around them are lame.
I like strong Americans. They inspire me. Professor Ayers was the man when he told students who asked him whether or not they should pursue a ‘terrorist’ agenda in order to bring change, “Do something else.”
Or Farrakhan, who takes on the gordian knot of American racism daily, no matter what is said about him or how effectively his character is assinated in the media. And his cause is good. I may not like what he has to say all the time because it calls you out of your comfort zone and even calls you wrong, if you let it. But I’ve at least listened to what he’s had to say on SEVERAL occasions. So I’d know.
Pastor Wright. The “soundbite” I heard is what we’ve all heard and, frankly, …..he called it. hahahaha And I love it when people get called out based on their behaviour or actions and then get indignant. So stupid. If you don’t like being called out, morons, don’t do dumb crap. It’s really simple. Treat others the way you’d like to be treated and you’ll be on your way. Abuse others and get called out – or worse. Who cares about an abuser?
Not me.
None of these men deserve the press they’ve received. Nobody with a working brain is even fooled.

Posted by: Rudy | November 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

“For nine months, I kept quiet,” Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan said today at Mosque Maryam in Chicago….
- From Jake’s story.
Why did Farrakhan feel so compelled to be quiet? Does he have the self-awareness to know he, himself, is a true wacko and that would reflect upon anybody associated with him, or did someone “get” to him? Bigmouths (with bigger egos) like this guy don’t shut up easily.
I’ll give the far left this much credit. The know how to fall into line and be quiet if it means achieving a goal. Of course a media mostly disinterested in pursuing stories about the far left didn’t hurt.
It is interesting the media didn’t have the “big, bad religious right” to kick around this election cycle. If there were any controversial religious figures prominent this year in politics it came mostly from the left. Lo and behold, suddenly religous influence on political discourse isn’t such a bad thing. Go figure?
The best we can hope for out of an Obama adminstration is he gets some religion (metaphorically speaking) and governs from the center. That would mean disappointing his mentors and all his blind faith acolytes. If, on the other hand, he does not then I am afraid an Obama nation will be an abomination (metaphorically speaking, once again).

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 9, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Farrakan says he kept quiet for nine months before the election about supporting Obama? Please! He’s been a lot of things, but never quiet. He called Obama the Messiah…well, he’s no where near my Messiah.
You know, I was wondering why in all the comment sections the pro Obama comments were 20 times more than McCains…then I heard that the Dems had teams of bloggers working full-time flooding the internet with their propaganda. Then they had all the TV networks, the left wing press (which is all of them), and Hollywood/TV talking heads all campaigning for Obama. How could he loose?

Posted by: JohnnyG | November 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Able: And what direction are you talking about. If this country was in a depression, people would be out of jobs, the banks would be closed and we would all be on food stamps. There will always be people out of work because the population is greater than the industry. And when I am talking about this generation yes, the media stated that 52% or more are on drugs and there is a booze problem in the colleges today. I went to school with a different generation, no booze, no drugs existed and there were crazy people going around protesting World War ll. We were too grown up for that. Freedom of speech is one thing bombing your own country is another. This is the greatest country in the world but radical’s like Ayers tried to destroy it. I didn’t vote for Obama because I don’t believe things are going to change. There will be more spending than ever. Nancy is one of the biggest.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 9, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I appreciate your remarks, Mark. Like you I am retired military, with 23 years of service. I have lived in several different countries, speak several languages, and read foreign newspapers in the original language, so I am very familiar with how the rest of the world (with reason) viewed the US during the Bush years. it’s nice to be seen as the good guys again.

Posted by: R Musick | November 9, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

To the comment that states “President Bush is considered a war criminal in Iraq. Do you think the American public would stand still if another country came in, grabbed him like we did to Noriega and Saddam, tried him and threw him in prison?”
The Iraq government tried and executed Saddam. It was not the US government. While it may burst your bubble of Bush hate, the reality is the vast majority of Iraqi citizens did not adore Saddam, with good reason. They were overjoyed at his trial and death and saw it as justice. Whatever else you wish to have against Bush, at least give the people of Iraq some credit too. Perhaps you just don’t believe Saddam should have been tried and executed, I do not make a judgement on that, rather I give the people of Iraq credit for trying to do what they felt was best for their country.

Posted by: win | November 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Oh and Mariann, you made the statement “this is the greatest country in the world.” How would you know, have you traveled the world? Your blatant ignorance and fear of the change is astonishing.

Posted by: Nick | November 10, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

JohnnyG: And calling Obama the Messiah is an abomination of God. But of course Farrakhan no doubt doesn’t have a religion, Wright is an atheist along with Father P. Neither one preaches the gospel. Obama never listened to any sermons from the bible when he attended that church. All he heard was about the white people and what they did to the black people and what American didn’t do for them. Why didn’t Obama leave that church like Oprah did. Because he believe in what Wright was saying.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 10, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Obama will be judged by his associations because those associations have affected how he will govern. The American people have lost faith in politicians and Obama will have a very short time to convince them that he is not some ultra leftist. These people all but admitting that they pulled one over on the voters will not help his cause.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I can only imagine why the heck this article was even written. I for years have watched the Ollie Norths’ G Gordan Liddy’s, Bob Jones, Pat Robertson’s, and various other white wing criminals, hate mongers and terrorist inciters be paraded by all kinds of republican candidates. Unrepentant Klan supporters (real terrorist) speak of there support for republicans, raise money and get invited to Right wing talk radio along with these candidates for there support.
Now how does that type of support relate to Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan? It does not, Ayers was a guy on a board, Wright was his paster in a church that has published every sermon on the internet yet they could find only a few snippets. Farrakhan does not even come close to mattering. I would really like to question these other conservatives about there real associations.

Posted by: Don | November 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Hey Nick,
Maybe a dose of reality might help you. The only government that convicted Saddam was one put in place by us.
And as for your comment that the vast majority in Iraq did not adore Saddam, yes that is true, but as the recent election has shown the vast majority of Americans do not like Bush or his world view/policies.
I personally could care less what happened with Saddam. We all pay for our sins sooner or later. But I see you don’t care to address our behavior as a whole regarding policing other countries. I guess you would jump right up at the chance of sending your son or daughter to invade China because we don’t like their human rights violations and we want to set things right. Real men and woman gave their life to fight a war that was meaningless, maybe that fact escapes you.
We spent 161 billion dollars in 2003 to fight terrorism, and in that year 1,800 people were killed by terrorist around the world. Of that number, 78 were Americans. In the same year 450,000 Americans died of heart disease and we spent 2.9 billion dollars trying to cure it. That’s 6500 times more tax dollars to save 78 people. Wake up fool.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Most of this is all nonsense. You need to be rooting for your new president. Our country depends on it.

Posted by: Steve Sanchez | November 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Obama attacking Nancy Reagan tells you everything you need to know about his values. He has none. Who attacks an 80 year old woman who just broke her hip? What a thug. Then he goes and whines when people say anything even remotely negative about him he sends his goons to dig through their driving record, to dig through their IRS records, and to attack them even if they are simple citizens. That is cowardice.
Obama has no class and he will bring shame to our country.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Nick: I don’t have to travel Sick Nick. Other countries are always making headlines in the news. And most of it isn’t good. First of all I wouldn’t want to go to foreign countries especially China or Japan because I wouldn’t eat their food. I don’t want to eat a cat or dog replacing chicken.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 10, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

President Obama will do a great job. I have hope for myself and the nation. The hatred in these comments are not our future but our past.

Posted by: Steve Sanchez | November 10, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Obama and the Democrats will over reach like Clinton did in the first two years of his administration because they will make the mistake of believing American will support their left wing agenda. I pray the Republicans do not provide the same help that they gave Clinton after the 94 drubbing. Obama and his band of thugs do not deserve our assistance. We need to destroy liberalism once and for all.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

You know, I was wondering why in all the comment sections the pro Obama comments were 20 times more than McCains…then I heard that the Dems had teams of bloggers working full-time flooding the internet with their propaganda. Then they had all the TV networks, the left wing press (which is all of them), and Hollywood/TV talking heads all campaigning for Obama. How could he loose?
Posted by: JohnnyG | Nov 9, 2008 11:55:09
I don’t think the ratio is remotely near 20 to 1. But I wouldn’t be shocked if Obama had paid bloggers whose purpose is to overwhem internet discussions. It sounds like a lot of effort and expense to try and sway a relatively small amount of voters. But with $700 million dollars to throw around, who really knows for sure? I don’t have any solid evidence so for now I won’t throw out there the accusation of paid bloggers. I have to assume Jakes board is clean of these dirtbags if they do exist (at least I hope so).
Something on more solid ground (there is some evidence) is the influence of illegal foreign campaign contributions on the Obama campaign. Think of contributions on untracable Swiss credit cards in unround amounts under $200. Unround amounts (example: $173.28 instead of $175.00) result from foreign currency conversions. The buzz around political circles is the Obama campaign had tons of such odd numbered contributions, almost all under $200 (those face far less regulatory scrutiny than amounts over $200).

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 10, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

misstickly,
You are right – Obama seems to have a real problem with women. Look how he treated Hillary.
Obama believe sexism and dismissiveness are useful political strategies. I find them cowardly, they demean half of our society. How can you improve the whole of society when your political strategies seek to minimize and destroy women.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

President-Elect Obama is an African American Christian and it is hypocritical of Republicans to say an African American-Muslim can’t be proud of him because of his accomplishments.
Just another shameful attempt to say anything about President-Elect Obama to paint some sort of mystery when in reality you are doing it because of a hatred that it so deeply imbedded in you that it hurts for republicans address it for what it is. It is so ingrained in them that some subconsciously do it.

Posted by: jpeezus | November 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Curt:
re: ‘Look how he treated Hillary.’
so.. what exactly did he do? specifics..!

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Blue, my comment only stated that Republicans should not help resucitate a liberal once their policies fail. How does that get to racism as you are implying. Is all criticim of Obama now racist? How pathetic. Now that we have elected a black man to be our president we need to just accept his governance no matter how flawed? The attempt to silence free speech and polictical opposition found in your comments is frightening.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Mariann,
You eat the foods you eat because you were raised on them. I’ve been and lived in other countries for long periods that eat foods that “you” find repulsive, the truth is you wouldn’t know if you were eating dog unless someone told you. I’ve had empanada’s made from iguana and if I hadn’t asked I would have never known.
Would I draw a line at eating bugs and roaches, certainly, but if you were truly hungry, and I don’t mean missing a meal or two, I mean hungry you would eat anything.
In survival school, military members eat the eyes from fish uncooked, try that sometime for fun, you do what you have to do to survive.
You have no world view or relevance in your opinions because you have never traveled and seen how most of the world lives. 45% of the worlds populations earns less than $2 a day, think about that. Just what do you think you could spend on food to support your family?
Just remember that the only lottery you really ever won was being born in America, so count your blessing that you were not born into poverty or a population that has an Aids infection rate of 40%, where most children under age 12 have no parents.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Polly: Are you living in wonderland? Ayers intentionally bombed the NYC police station killing three policemen and 2 others. Where have you been. And this country should have approved wire tapping under certain conditions. Because you protested the war is no reason to bomb your own country. That’s like saying we have the right to bomb this country if we don’t like what they do. If you believe Obama, Wright, Farrakhan and Father P love this country then you better think again. Obama wanted to make history. He was caught up wanting to be like MLK whose books he read when he was young. Obama should walk in his own shoes because he will never be like MLK, JFK or RFK. But he has the majority of the public believing it. Apparently they are easy to fool and he really fooled them.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 10, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.
Obama is not an awful speaker when he isn’t in front of a teleprompter. And Obamas mentor Jerimiah Wright and Farrakhan have nothing in common when it comes to racism.

Posted by: fernando | November 10, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Hey how about remaining quiet?

Posted by: LaToya | November 10, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Sarah Palin talked about the impact the Obama attacks on her will have for young women. She basically said, hey if you are a young girl you had better study harder than the boys and you had better be twice as good. The reporter covering the press conference brought up his daughter and the concern he had for her future. If we could only get Obama to listen to people like that reporter then maybe he would change his opinion of women or at least how he treats them.
Mark my words, Obama will nominate very few women for cabinet positions. There is a clear dissonance between him and women. He almost seems annoyed when he has to engage them in the arena of ideas. And this is the man we elected to bring hope to our daughters?

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

I think the responders that see people who support Obama candidacy as reflections of Obama are wrong. There is a great divide between Wright and Farrakhan. Those that see plots afoot, great machinations, conspiracies- isn’t life interesting enough? why ignore the Bush failures ? Why not give Obama a chance? Why not do something positive instead of carp Too many critics and not enough artists

Posted by: Frank S | November 10, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

I wasn’t paid to blog for OBAMA, Just like many others I did it for free, I also placed calls, donated money….I know you haters find it hard to believe…that one…he has a following of soldiers that will keep fighting for him….all for free!!!

Posted by: Cindy | November 10, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I wonder how much longer the emotionally charged names of Farrakhan, Wright, and Ayers are going to be paraded. They’re clearly not names and issues that have been exhausted.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

I BELIEVE THEY ARE ALL CARTOON CHARACTERS INCLUDING OBAMA.
THERE TIME TO REUNITE WILL COME… WHEN THIS NATION SINKS UNDER OBAMA…
THEY WOULD HAVE SOLD ONE OF THEIR OWN TO MAERICA, TO DO US IN.. WE ARE DRUNK WITH OBAMA’S WORDS YET.
THEY ARE ALL STILL SAME TO ME..

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | November 10, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Frank S,
Give Obama a chance? Why would we simply stand by while Obama attempts to replace our system of government with a european style socialism? Undoing an overreaching government usually involves war and revolution. It is much better to prevent it in the first place. Once we give up our freedoms in the name of government we will not get them back without great pain.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Obama does not hate women…just because he didn’t pick Hillary….that would have been a poor move for him….he doesn’t need Bill back in the Whitehouse….he needs to be his own man…he will have women cabinet members

Posted by: Cindy | November 10, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Hillary should be given credit for her own mind and her own career and not be interchangable with her husband. By your standards Barack is only now “proud of his country”

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Mark: I don’t care how the other countries live. That is not my problem and I am not going to make it my problem. That’s the problem of their government. The restaurants I go to I know what I am eating. Evidenly I don’t eat the same food as you and I wouldn’t because I don’t cater to foreign countries or their people. We have our problems here also. We are letting in too many foreigner’s which we should have put a stop to many years ago. The people that were born and raised here should come first.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 10, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

“Sarah Palin talked about the impact the Obama attacks on her will have for young women . . .”
Curt, The worst attacks on Palin came from within the McCain campaign. To name a couple of their allegations , they’re the ones who called her and her family the Wasilla hillbillies and referred to her as a whack job.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Curt:
your posts seem to have the word ‘destroy’
alot………….. very curious….
you said you wanted to ‘destroy’ liberalism, I said nothing about criticism, all you have are vague innuendo and ‘talking points’.
I asked you for specifics on how Obama seeks to ‘minimize and destroy’ Sen. Clinton, you gave …….NONE.
you said ‘Sen, Obama’s attacks on Gov. Palin’..
specifics… again

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

hello he played ’99 problems’ as he walked out on stage at a victory rally during the primaries! He’s sexist and not too shy about it either…

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

I can only imagine why the heck this article was even written. I for years have watched the Ollie Norths’ G Gordan Liddy’s, Bob Jones, Pat Robertson’s, and various other white wing criminals, hate mongers and terrorist inciters be paraded by all kinds of republican candidates. Unrepentant Klan supporters (real terrorist) speak of there support for republicans, raise money and get invited to Right wing talk radio along with these candidates for there support.
Posted by: Don | Nov 10, 2008 12:11:35 AM
The only time I can remeber that a Klan member ran for office was when David Duke ran for Governor of Louisianna. In the runoff election between him (an Independent) and the Democrat, the Republicans threw their support behind the Democrat rather then support a non-Democrat with Klan ties.
The only member of the US Senate with past membership in the Klan is Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia. He has since, presumably, disavowed the Klan.
Ollie North, G Gordan Liddy, Bob Jones, Pat Robertson have never belonged to the Klan. (Although Bob Jones, a fervent anti-Catholic, maybe should have. He would have belonged.)
Only G. Gordon Liddy is a convicted felon.
I could go into the Klan’s historic ties to the Democatic party, but why? That would be unfair since the today’s Democratic Party is not tied to the Klan. Just as the Republican Party doesn’t have (and has never had) ties to the Klan. Lets try to be rationale here and….
Be factual in our assertions.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Republicans, Spence & Cantor and the rest will
become a narrow quasi- fundamentalist political party…..with nothing but hate and fear as policies……..
“Republicans would rebuild their party based on social issues and fiscal conservatism.
“You build those conservative solutions,..on the same time-honored principles of limited government, a belief in free markets, in the sanctity of life, the sanctity of marriage. There were three state referendums on marriage … all three carried. The vitality of the conservative movement around the country is very real,” said Pence.”

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Elections over! All the rats are coming out of the woodpile!

Posted by: Mihan | November 10, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

If we cannot quesion our president we have no chance to prevent failure. This isn’t good for Obama and certainly isn’t good for our country.

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Nobody cares about Ayers or Wright or the other guy. They were never important, they will never be important, they were never meant to be important. Because the Republican party is so completely fragmented, so completely detached from any semblance of a core message, it can only attack others on unimportant non-issues. Fiscal responsibility? No longer owned by the Republican party. Reduce unnecessary gov’t. spending? No longer a GOP talking point. Tax breaks for ordinary middle class Americans? Only the wealthy need apply. Adios, Republican Party.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | November 10, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Curt,
We, as a country under the rattling of the fear sticks, gave up much under George Bush.
I believe, also, that undoing the Bush redistribution of wealth (in the top 2%’s benefit) is tantamount to an “European style socialism”.
I fear nocons government style and it’s results for the middle class…
You appear to fear a more leftist style of government and it’s implied ramifications…
We should be able to agree to disagree and realize that we both love this country and want the best for it, we just differ on the path to get to that end.
However, I take exception to your comment “Undoing an overreaching government usually involves war and revolution. It is much better to prevent it in the first place. Once we give up our freedoms in the name of government we will not get them back without great pain.”
The current administration was extremely overreaching, just not in the leftist manner that you fear (regulation & taxes), and all it took to undo that was a majority of the electoral college.
This is my first and only post – ever. I will happily read the conservative response in silence.
HC

Posted by: Swift | November 10, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

How can the GOP move forward when it is so deeply divided between its right wing and its center? There is no tolerance from the right wing for the moderates, except for fund raising and election day. Limbaugh and Hannity and their ilk will soon be pounding McCain like he was a pinata. “Republican In Name Only.”

Posted by: Steve from Danville | November 10, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Curt
here’s a real life example of one politician trying to ‘destroy’ another with vicious lies……
Saxby Chambliss, Sen. from Ga. during his 2002 campaign used the refrain of national defense and security, but drew criticism for television ads that paired images of Cleland and Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, and for questioning the commitment to homeland security of his opponent,
•-> Max Cleland, a triple amputee and decorated Vietnam veteran.
•-> Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona said of one ad, “It’s worse than disgraceful, it’s reprehensible;” Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska said the ads were “beyond offensive to me.”
Chambliss never served in the military himself, allegedly due to a bad knee.

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

The Republican Party used to be fiscal responsible and socially moderate. Now they’re socially intolerant and fiscally irresponsible, water-carriers for the corporate lobbyists who feed at the trough of the United States Treasury.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | November 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

That is a sad commentary on where we are as a country. Why is political dissent improper only when it is directed toward a Democrat?

Posted by: Curt | November 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

“Nobody cares about Ayers or Wright or the other guy.”
Steve – I wish that were the case, but they’re loaded words. Several weeks ago, Pail was invoking Ayers to angry crowds, along with using another loaded word, socialism, frequently. According to Newsweek, The Secret Service received a spike in death threats toward Obama during that time.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Well if Ayers ,Farrakhan,or Wright are history what about this ?
It’s funny how this isn’t reported by the MAIN Stream Media
By Khalid Hasan
WASHINGTON: Another of President-elect Barack Obama’s appointments has been greeted with disbelief by Pakistani-Americans and liberal members of the Indian community because Sonal Shah, the adviser picked up by Obama for his transition team, is known for her links to communal Hindu organisations.
Vishwa Hari Parishad (VHP) and its student wing Bajrang Dal are believed to have been involved in the massacre of over 2,000 Muslims in Gujarat and for the last three months have been carrying out a sustained campaign against Indian Christians in Orissa.
Sonal Shah has been the national coordinator for VHP-America and her father has been associated with the Overseas Friends of the BJP. Further, her organisation IndiCorps works with a VHP-sponsored initiative called the Ekal Vidyalayas – or single-teacher schools with a curriculum steeped in instilling hatred against non-Hindu religious minorities. Ekal Vidyalayas have played a key role in anti-minority violence in the states of Orissa and Madhya Pradesh. IndiCorps founders also have a close relationship with controversial Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
According to Vijay Prashad, Chairman of South Asian history and director of international studies at Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, Sonal Shah’s Houston-based parents were “not only in the ecumenical Gujarati Samaj, but also in the far more cruel organisations of the Hindu Right, such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Overseas Friends of the BJP and the Ekal Vidyalaya. Shah’s parents, Ramesh and Kokila, not only work as volunteers for these outfits, but they also held positions of authority in them. Their daughter was not far behind. She was an active member of the VHPA, the US branch of the most virulently fascistic outfit within India. The VHP’s head, Ashok Singhal, believes that his organisation should ‘inculcate a fear psychosis among (India’s) Muslim community.’ This was Shah’s boss. Till 2001, Shah was the National Coordinator of the VHPA.” In 2004, the hard Right government in Gujarat honoured Shah with the Pride of Gujarat (Gujarat Garima) award.”
__________________

Posted by: RocktheJungle | November 10, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Curt, I am with you, Man. No criticism is getting through these moderators.
Uh, I guess you guys will have to take my word for it when I say Obama was the wrong choice. ABC news won’t let me tell you why.
Am I on hidden camera here?

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Rev. Wright served 4 years in the US Marine Corps and 4 years as a US Navy Hospital Corpsman serving with the US Marine Corps as a Fleet Marine Hospital Corpsman. How many of you republicans put your arse on line for your country?

Posted by: jhs | November 10, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

The GOP is parading the garbage about Obama’s associations because they still haven’t come to grip with how a decorated American war hero, a 20+ year member of the Senate, lost an election to a black, radical, Muslim that pals around with terrorists. Their words not mine.
They painted a picture of the bogeyman as their opponent, someone we should be affraid of, OMG he might be a shhh… a “Muslim?”, like even if he was it would have any relevance. Of course Muslim was simply a nicer way of saying BLACK, which wouldn’t be appropriate.
You know the election of Obama speaks volumes about what the American public thought of John McCain and the direction of the Republican party.
My guess is they will continue to look for ways to paint Obama as someone bad, instead of saying OK, we screwed this one up, we need to take a good long look at what we did wrong.
My last post, but I personally think any Republican would have had a tough time this election. Bush has a 26% approval rating, lower than when Nixon resigned. McCain went negative, never focused on anything, appeared to make snap decisions that he reversed course on days after. None of it looked presidential. Image has as much to do with getting elected as substance.
Palin’s interviews were not inspiring material, and now we see the infighting by the campaign staff trying to find someone to blame. Palin was a one hit wonder and will probably never see the national stage again. She seemed to stand for everything today’s Republican party represents, and that is the very thing that people voted down.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Hopefully Obama’s election means the permanent marginalization of Farrakhan and fellow bigots like Sharpton. Ayers was already on the margins, as were the hysterics in the McCain/Palin campaign who tried to use him as a wedge issue.

Posted by: Pacific moderate | November 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Curt:
re: “Why is political dissent improper only when it is directed toward a Democrat? ”
have you been living in America since the start of the Iraqi war? did you never hear the invective hurled at anyone who had a policy difference with Bush & Cheney?
from Joe Wilson to the Dixie Chicks…..

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

For cripe’s sake, I am a democrat–let me post. I just don’t like ‘The One!!!!’

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

We learned that the incendiary hate rallies backfired on Palin. The video image of McCain pushing back on the wing nut in the red T-shirt will be preserved for decades. Even Lindsay Graham, one of the most despicable cheerleaders for McCain’s dysfunctional message has said recently that the GOP resembles a bunch of grumpy old men.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | November 10, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Blue: Yes as a democrat I remember the Dixie chicks and the horrible Valerie Plane stuff too. But Blue, you don’t want to be THEM. I never wished I was on the republican side, not ever. But now you are on the side that is silencing the critics–do you want that. I don’t believe you do.

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

missticky – curt;
I moderate, not this one, but another blog. When you hit the “post” the only stop sign between your finger & the information super-highway are key words that block a post; posters can be blocked, but you do not appear to be blocked.
There is 42% anti Obama here & 56% pro Obama…the rest is post to post BS.
Hope you get on soon!

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

The future of the GOP lies with moderate Republicans, respected leaders and politicians like Hagel, Colin Powell, Lugar, Collins and Snowe. The right wing zealots like Michelle Bachman, Hannity, Limbaugh, Jim Bunning and the nut case from Oklahoma? Their message is toxic, for good reason.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | November 10, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

miss – yup.
love to read all the anger & intelligence.
I vote, not debate.
Keep tryin!

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

misstickly, maybe your just trying to paint a picture that doesn’t exist?
Unless your saying some pretty ugly things, ever other post you send seems to make it to publication. Seems like more smear, trying to get political millage out of nothing, some big conspiracy that anything you say is getting pulled because you support a different view.
Don’t you think we all know that no one is editing your posts or keeping them from being posted?

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

misstickly
you are correct, I DON’T want to silence any open discussions on issues and opinions… I don’t mind reading some of the what I would consider ‘fringe’ posts from some folks here, and I even realize many are posted with the goal of ‘ticking’ other folks off…….
Wild accusations, innuendo, smears and guilt by association doesn’t exactly foster real exchanges of ideas…
We can all use the ‘net to replay almost anything on any issue, but real personal opinion
is always the best…. and it’s how we all eventually will find common ground to make America work for everyone and to keep her safe.

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Andrew,
yes I have – read the book.
Not quite there yet though, no matter how many posts get deleted or changed before your very eyes, although I see the inference.
It is BS, yes.
Keep counting, maybe it will lull you into submission.
It looks as if Curt is on the outs list or he got lulled into submission!

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Mark
I’ve had comments edited also….

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Hey Larry W,
History lesson, Obama’s father was actually a British citizen. Kenya did not even exist at that time, it was formally known as the British East Africa Protectorate. Kenya became an independent country December 12, 1963.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

hey Mark, fightthesmears says Obama freely admits he held dual citizenship (US & Kenya) until like 1982. Get with the program.

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Reality check folks. The election is so over. You cannot change the results. Soon, this bitterness you are embracing will become you. Every day you waste sphewing forth your venom is another day wasted that you will never get back. Move onward and upward.

Posted by: Yankee | November 10, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Miss,
I didn’t think you were, just havin fun and hope that you get all your stuff out there, some how, some where, if not here.
First post EVER tonight, right here. I am too slow to notice if anything is nazied or not although not too silly to care.
best of luck even though we disagree about BHO.

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

misstickly:
you can hold dual citizenship w/o being born in that country!
C’mon, those are two separate issues.
Go back and read the post about being BORN in Kenya…unless you think some lefty MSM freak changed it!!!!

Posted by: Swift | November 10, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

you all need to realize you aren’t debating only right wingers. There are a lot of liberals just like me. There are alot of women who feel harassed, just like me and I haven’t decided yet what you all can do to make up for treating us so poorly. If you are a democrat I know you have to know one woman at least that was offended. It has been very offensive. It matters not what any man thinks is offensive. That’s actually the law when it comes to harassment. I and more than a few of my girl friends/family members were at offended at some of this bashing.
I trust that democrats will find a way to make it up to us women. I am still somewhat hopeful anyway.

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Mark:
You’re correct about Kenya. You’re also probably aware that Hawaii became part of the Union two years prior to Obama’s birthdate (1961) – in 1959.
None of that matters in terms of the Constitutionally-mandated condition for eligibility to the office of president, the relevant condition being that the candidate be a “natural-born citizen” of the United Sates. Please note that “natural-born” and “citizen” are in no way the same thing – and that’s why Schwarzennegger cannot run for President (although I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t mind having a go).
The bottom line is that, if as alleged by his grandmother (a decidely non-senile lady) that she was present at Obama’s birth – in Kenya.
And even if she’s wrong, there’s still the Indonesian issue, where it appears likely that Obama relinquished his U.S, citizenship. There isn’t space here to delve into the accompanying complexity.
Berg has brought suit against Obama, now to the Supreme Court. Certeriorari will be actioned Dec 1st. Numerous states have subsequently brought suit in the past two days. Electoral College reps are now saying that they will not allow their adjudication and vote to proceed without proper proof of various important documents from Obama, which so far have been withheld – by Obama, and by nobody else but Obama.
I smell a rat, as do uncountably many other people in this country. I suggest you, and others here, properly inform yourselves on this issue before jumping to the “easy” conclusion.

Posted by: Andrew Palfreyman | November 10, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Hey missticky,
I agree with you wholeheartedly. I, for one, think women got the short end of the deal this entire last two years!

Posted by: Larry W | November 10, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Larry W, sorry if I got it wrong but I thought you wrote ‘Obama was ‘most likely’ born in Kenya.’
My point was that Kenya did not exist at that time of his birth.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

miss:
I thought the GOP Pallin was more of a slap in the face than anything on the yellow dog side…silly me.
I am not a woman so I am left to my wonderings about the inner workings of the female mind (thus is the die cast for most men since…Adam).

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

amazingly enough, and like most Americans…
I just don’t care, Jake.

Posted by: Tungsten | November 10, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

misstickly
what specifically are you referencing with your posts on ‘harassment’ and ‘being treated poorly’?

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Wazzup: this is what you are missing and it’s right in front of your face actually. It isn’t a fact that Palin is dumb. It’s a perception. Bideen, Obama & McCain all said dumb things that weren’t itemized daily. It is a double standrd. And now we have ‘unnamed’ reports? Shame, when women are are stake, why would you quote unnamed sources that could say whatever? One thing McCain and the RNC counted on was that the left would easily skewer the woman. And know they dont have to blame bush, they don’t have to blame their wrong ideology, they can blame Palin. If you believe the governor of Alaska is THAT dumb, then you fell for it. Hook, line and Sinker.
She could have be a rock star, too (in as much as a right winger can be a rock star), if people didn’t easily jump on the mob bandwagon. It’s too easy to beat down a woman.
So to answer your question, it was a slap in the face, but when push comes to shove, how many millions are really to blame for letting them get away with it? Were you part of that?

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children:
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
In other words, at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.
Obama’s British citizenship was short-lived. On Dec. 12, 1963, Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom.
We can argue where he really was born but clearly he was not born in Kenya, because it wasn’t there. He has in fact held at least three citizenship’s, British, Kenyan, and US by birth.
As for the court cases involving his birth, here is the story;
Mr. Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack of standing. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari for review of the case and an injunction to stay the election pending review. Justice Souter denied the injunction. It is expected that the Court will decide whether or not to review Berg v. Obama after the Defendants file their response, and Mr. Berg has replied to the Defendant’s response.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

So there are actually forces at play which are claiming that BHO was born in Kenya?
Is it even possible (ignore the fact that the standard neocon answer is “MSM cover-up”) that this was not all over the news, with night time investigation TV tracking his mother’s placenta and the like! I hear about it – first – on a blog at 12:00 am EST???
C’mon, get real!
PROOF or BS! Even if you hate the guy because of this or that…c’mon! I would imagine that someone checks your credentials before you just are allowed to run? No?

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

missticky, i see your point.

Posted by: carlasue | November 10, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

miss,
Maybe I was part of it??? That will take a few minutes to digest & more than that of introspection…but I have a different view.
Dumb was never the issue with me – as far as the Pallin choice goes. I thought part of the choice was only because she is a woman, that is pandering and almost as deplorable as anything else. I felt she was chosen not because of her politics & credentials but because she was a woman & worse yet (I think) because she is attractive…here is our Barbie doll, now go out & get the “Joe six-pack” vote!
I gave her the benefit until the SECOND interview on her ignorance! I felt I was generous.
She was a rock star, still is to some neocon’s…whatever.
But I must say that there has been alot of idiot calling (I think rightly so) about the sitting POTUS…non-female.

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Thanks Carlasue,
word to the sister *fist jab*

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

missticky this whole thing scares me. being a disabled democrat whith no a ot of future….this whole thing makes me scared. what the heck do i do

Posted by: carlasue | November 10, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Personally, and to draw some flak here I suppose, I have to say this. I was in restaurant management for 30 years. In that time I was an ‘assistant’ manager for about 20 years. In those years I had a number of female ‘higher ups.’ Thank goodness. Some of these ladies could easily be the President…and more. I, a long time ago, got over the ‘boy vs. girl’ crap. I don’t see the President elect as a ‘black man,’ and I certainly didn’t watch anyone else running for office as anything other than a candidate. Although Palin may have said a few things that raised an eyebrow, so did everyone else. Unfortunately we live in a sociey where the female is going to get the treatment first. I understand that being new to the scene made her more of a target…but we went overboard. The guys, dudes, males, machos, whatever, all made some stupid comments, some real idiotic statements to say the least, but we really focused on the gal. Hillary Clinton (I am not a big fan) is an awesome person with some real gifts to share. If she was a male we would have certainly done a lot better job of listening. Someday this country will evolve to a point where we don’t care if you wear a skirt or slacks…only that you have the guts to lead us. We took a small step a few days ago…hopefully we will stop massaging our heads with our buttocks and open our eyes in the years to come.
This country is filled with women who can do it better than their male counterparts…we need to stop being afraid of them.

Posted by: Larry W | November 10, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

missticky, you have been courageos and out going , and politically chareged to believe in what you what to. god bless you so am i. thank god for the democrats, and we must lead a peaceful nation, a world without violience. god help us all. god bles the usa.

Posted by: carlasue | November 10, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

We never see what’s on the cutting room floor of those interviews. I have a feeling there’s some dumb stuff from Obama on a lot of tile. There has to be. Even I say dumb stuff all the time *sic*.
Chew on that. I tell you believe it, she was made by many willing people to look dumber than everyone else.
Plus she has bad policy, but that’s where I leave it. I don’t go for her policy but I believe she is a capable intelligent woman 100% despite what I was shown. I would be horrified if my pregnant daughter was outed and smeared. I wouldn’t have been the grace under fire this lady is.
Again, McCain was not really pandering, they knew they were going to lose and they didn’t want it to look like the party was rejected so soundly, so they found a scapegoat. That’s why they are smearing her now. They want everyone to remember it this way so in four years, they don’t remember, “oh yeah, you re the party that stinks ideologically.” They banked on sexism, Baby, they saw it happen to Hillary.
We were used by EVERYONE. How dismal is that?

Posted by: MissTickly | November 10, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Well I hope this doesn’t get deleted or edited ;) but I just want to say this has been an interesting discussion, passionate, and I hope productive.
It never hurts to expose oneself to different views, hopefully we all read them with an open mind and give real thought to everyone’s views. There is a difference between discussing issues and spewing hate. Be positive, the American people have spoken and hopefully we have made the correct choice. We have been wrong before, I’m sure we will be wrong again.
It’s growing late, so I bid you all goodnight!
Please carry on and remember in the end it is each and every ones civic responsibility and duty to make this world a better place. For good or bad, we can embrace President elect Obama and try to make this a better country, or we can continue down a path that doesn’t really paint a very bright future for us or our children.
Peace to all of you.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

I have never been able to bite the MSM bait…
Yes true stories get killed by good intentioned (right & left) controllers (editors & the like).
But to think that entire hordes of reporters, print, radio, & tv can be effectively – almost completely – silenced?
I know how hard it is to say “abc, xyz” in a room of 3 people without my aunt in Idaho knowing about it in 2 hours!

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

Everything Mark says about the eligibility issue is factually correct, and misstickly (FSM?) totally gets the big picture. For those of you interested in the legal issues, they are available at BreakTheMatrix. This is by far and away the best presentation of the facts of the matter I have seen in several days of research on this matter. Apologies for the length of this, but it is not simple.
===================
(This analysis raises a very interesting issue – even if Obama was natural born, he must be a natural born “citizen”. Thus if Obama – or his Mother- renounced his US citizenship when he became a citizen of Indonesia, Obama would have to again become a US citizen when he returned to Hawaii. Apparently, Obama has not shown that he took an “oath of alliegence” and obtained naturalized citizenship when he returned from Indonesia. One of the items being sought in the current Hawaii lawsuit is Obama’s signed oath of alliegence. While the vault birth certificate is still importent, there are other issues that can render him ineligible for the POTUS.)
Is Barack Obama a Natural Born Citizen?
Posted by Rick Williams on Mon, 10/27/2008 – 21:22 in BreakTheMatrix
Article II Section 1. of the United States Constitution provides: “No person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the office of President.” All across the internet we see the constitutional question arising– does Barack Obama meet this (these) requirement(s)? Here’s some legal discussion on the subject.
First, a couple of disclaimers. (1) Neither Breakthematrix nor I endorse or support Obama, or McCain, or any other candidate in the upcoming election. (2) This column is NOT written for the purpose of persuading anyone to vote for or against Obama, or to offer any sort of “answer” on the issue whether Obama is (or is not) IN FACT a “natural born citizen.” Rather, my purpose is to address the legal issues involved, and hopefully provide some insight as to what the constitutional outcome should be under different factual assumptions. I note that McCain’s candidacy also raises a “natural born citizen” issue– but there is a core difference between the McCain and Obama circumstances. In the McCain case, the relevant birth facts are all known and undisputed– it’s a pure question of law whether he qualifies for the presidency or not. In the Obama case, by contrast, the FACTS THEMSELVES are clouded or disputed, and resolution of these factual questions is necessary before the legal /constitutional issues can be determined. Very simply, on the existing factual record I would not presume to say for certain where Obama was born, or what happened during (and after) his years in Indonesia that might have impacted his status as a “natural born citizen.” The factual record isn’t clear enough to persuade me one way or the other on these points, but this doesn’t mean we can’t consider the constitutional issues involved by use of differing factual assumptions. Such “either/or” consideration based on varying hypothetical fact scenarios is a common staple in proper legal analysis– and that’s what I offer in this column. So here’s a framework:
(a) Obama’s place of birth.
If Obama was in fact born in Hawaii, as his backers claim, the issue of “natural born” is put to rest. But note, the issue of legal “citizenship” remains open, EVEN IF the birth location issue is resolved in Obama’s favor. Being “natural born” is not enough– the constitutional requirement is that Obama be a “natural born citizen.” (See further discussion on the “citizen” point below.)
If Obama was born in Kenya, or any country other than the United States, he does not qualify as “natural born” and he is constitutionally unqualified to serve in the office of president. This point is a matter of settled law, and is beyond dispute. The “natural born” requirement cannot be cured or swept away by any sort of subsequent immigration or naturalization proceeding– i.e., Arnold Schwarzenegger cannot serve as president.
(b) Is Obama presently a “citizen” of the US?
Persons questioning Obama’s qualification point to events after his birth. Specifically, they argue that Obama’s mother married an Indonesian named Lolo Soetoro and moved with him to Indonesia, taking young Barack with her. The assertion is made in lawsuits that Barack was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and became an Indonesian citizen. School records are cited by persons challenging the Obama candidacy as listing Barack’s name as Barry Soetoro; his citizenship as Indonesian; his father as Lolo Soetoro; and his religion as Islam. When Barack was approximately 10 years of age, he was sent back to Hawaii by his mother to live with his maternal grandparents. She subsequently divorced Lolo Soetoro, although she apparently spent much of her later life in Indonesia with her daughter (Barack’s half sister, Maya). From a legal standpoint, it appears that Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship during the relevant time frames, so affirmative conduct by Barack’s mother to become an Indonesian citizen (and to cause young Barack to gain Indonesian citizenship) would seem to have the effect of extinguishing American citizenship, even though dual citizenship is allowed under American law. Assuming that Barack’s mother did in fact become an Indonesian citizen, it is noteworthy that no record has emerged to date which establishes that she ever took the Oath of Allegiance or any other action to regain her US citizenship. Nor has any record emerged to establish that Barack ever took the Oath of Allegiance to regain his US citizenship (assuming, of course, that he was a US citizen at birth). Indeed, allegations exist in connection with some of the lawsuits that Barack traveled to Pakistan in 1981 on an Indonesian passport, possibly under the name Barry Soetoro. Such conduct (if it actually happened) would surely be viewed as an adult event which reaffirmed Barack’s status as an Indonesian citizen. No record has emerged that Barack ever legally reinstated his name as “Barack Obama”– raising a possible issue whether the current ballot listing under the Obama name is itself false and misleading.
While the issues and facts are far from clear at this point, it appears that if Obama became an Indonesian citizen as a young boy, traveled as an adult on an Indonesian passport to Pakistan in 1981, and NEVER WENT THROUGH the requisite naturalization process to restore his US citizenship (by taking the Oath of Allegiance) then he is not presently a “citizen” of the US and is not constitutionally qualified. Obama might argue on these facts that he has maintained to this very day a DUAL citizenship, either between Kenya/US or between Indonesia/US, but the purpose of Article II Section 1. seems rather clearly to be elimination of any lingering question of divided loyalty, and dual citizenship seems to arguably fall short of the constitutional loyalty standard even if Barack was “natural born” as a US citizen in the first instance.
(c) Is Obama a “natural born citizen” within the full meaning of that term?
Let’s ASSUME the following set of facts for discussion purposes: (1) Obama born in Hawaii; (2) Obama becomes an Indonesian citizen early in life; (3) Obama later relinquished his Indonesian citizenship and properly restored his US citizenship by taking the Oath of Allegiance in a naturalization proceeding. Under this unique hypothetical, does Obama qualify as a “natural born citizen?”
This hypothetical has never been tested in the courts, as far as I know. Under this scenario, Obama would be deemed “natural born” but his present citizenship would have been accomplished through a naturalization process rather than a birth process. Some commentators argue that the fact of later naturalization as the grounding for citizenship is disqualifying– but as for me, I’m not so sure. I think Obama could make a pretty good legal argument on these facts that he was indeed a “natural born citizen” at the outset of his life, and that he’s a citizen today (albeit naturalized). It’s a close legal question, but a reasonable court might conclude that the constitutional test is met on such facts.
Is any of this important? You bet it is. The Obama people are living in a dream world if they think these constitutionally significant issues will be swept under the rug in the euphoria of an Obama election victory. Already there are eight existing lawsuits, and more will keep coming until the unresolved fact questions which underpin Obama’s claim of core qualification for office are put to rest with definitive answers. We need to know, with a high degree of confidence, whether Obama is “natural born” and whether he’s a “citizen.” Crisis of legitimacy, anyone?

Posted by: Andrew Palfreyman | November 10, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Mark – Amen brother!
Peace.

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Election was over Nov. 4, 2008!!!
Today, is November 10, 2008!!!!
People get a LIFE!!!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 10, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Sister: You make a GREAT calendar, but these concerns don’t exactly have an expiration date.

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Ohmmmmmm-bama!!!
(Just kidding.)
Peace. (and Go Romney-Jindal in 2012!)
Goodnight.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 10, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Are you sure Jindal is a citizen? JUST KIDDING!

Posted by: Larry W | November 10, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

carlasue: I haven’t decided yet what they need to do to get me back. But you can bet they will miss us while we are still sulking and rightfully so!

Posted by: misstickly | November 10, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

misstickly
Gov. Palins comments were enough for me to make a judgment and assess her capabilities for office. Much of what she said didn’t make a great deal of sense to me.
Sen. Clinton speaks with a great depth of knowledge and nuance on many issues and policies.
on the other hand, Bachman and Schmidt are ideologues with little substance.
I listen to what they say….. and I don’t really care what they wear.

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

From the most recent interview with Sarah Palin:
Here’s some of what she had to say:
Question: — Why did your campaign lose?
Palin: — I think the Republican ticket represented too much of the status quo, too much of what had gone on in these last eight years, that Americans were kind of shaking their heads like going, wait a minute, HOW DID WE RUN UP A $10 TRILLION DEBT IN A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION, how have there been blunders with war strategy under a Republican administration.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

Miss:
Good points.
Yes there was a slight (opinion) frenzy about her daughter’s pregnancy. But she had to handle it as she did (poise & grace under fire) it was her choice to drag the darling lass into the press viper pit by accepting the offer of VP to be!
I think.
God forbid I couldn’t delete, spell check & retype, over & over for my own ignorant statements! ;) hard to believe I am sure, so yes I am certain all of the candidates – of all time – have footage on the floor (that includes BHO, & I am for “THE ONE”)…how bad is SP’s cutting room floor footage? You think only the good stuff is on the floor? She would have said something by now, or has that been cut too???
I do agree with you – mostly. I voted for Hillary in the primary & still think she would make our best POTUS, but short of a write in for her, I BO’d…next best, definately better than the GOP.

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

g’nite to all

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

Are you sure Jindal is a citizen? JUST KIDDING!
Posted by: Larry W | Nov 10, 2008 2:46:24 AM
LOL!
Now I’m really out of here. Goodnight.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

blue – obahmanation:
Nite.
Good to hear your points!
Peace!

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

misstickly :
There is too much going on in the world to worry whether Obama was born in heaven or hell!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 10, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

I really like Reverend Wright’s sermons.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

Seriously, I’ve listened to a number of Reverend Wright’s sermons. They’re good. I like them.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

miss:
U leave?
Thought you would reply to something by the time I read the whole legal history of BHO’s POTUS eligibility item placed by Andrew.
Thanks Andrew! It was long, but very informative & worth the read.
I appreciate your taking the time to post it. I hope it all pans out that BHO will be POTUS – but that is just my opinion – but only if allowed by law.

Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Take the time to listen to the sermons of Reverend Wright. He’s not the best speaker in the world, but his sermons are fair and decent. You’ll be surprised.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Wazzup:
You’re very welcome! I am concerned about this for no other reason but that the prospect of a usurper gaining access to the presidency – not to mention to a collection of the most closely guarded national secrets – fills me with abject horror. Whether his skin is green, puce or violet has no bearing on the issue (it should go without saying). It’s 100% a constitutional issue. That is, it is unless you want to rip up the Constitution.

Posted by: Andrew Palfreyman | November 10, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Please everyone, Obama should be given every bit of respect, cooperation, and moral support that George Bush was given.
By the way, have you heard? On OBama’s first day in office he is (by executive order) going to cut back on domestic fuel exploration. Change, yeah!

Posted by: rick g | November 10, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

rick g:
GREAT! That would achieve two really important goals which I know we all want to see happen:
1. A further reduction in our ability to self-sustain ourselves as a nation and to increase our dependency, and to reduce even further the number of jobs available domestically.
2. A big favor to the oil-producing nations of the Middle East. They will be so happy. Do you think Obama has any kind of special relationshio with them? After all, one of his names IS Hussein. I believe that’s an Arab name, isn’t it?
Excellent news!

Posted by: Andrew Palfreyman | November 10, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Funny how the far right of the Republican party can be threatened with these individuals, and claim that they are unamerican; I see they same thing when I look at the far right.

Posted by: Thinking | November 10, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

The wing nuts from the fringes end up being the same.
Rev. Wright’s insane ranting is no different than the ravings of Falwell and Robertson after 9/11 or Sarah Palin’s pastor claiming that God’s hand was being raised to smack us all around.
Farrakhan’s views on Jews aren’t any different than those of the freak who lectured Palin’s congregation about Israel being terrorized because Jews refused to become Christian. They’re both hateful anti-Semites.
Ayers and Liddy shared the same extremism to further different causes…Liddy just didn’t succeed in fire bombing the Brookings Institute.
I think the nut cases from both ends of the spectrum should move to Alaska, secede from the union, fight it out amongst themselves and leave the rest of us alone.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 10, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

All of this is moot. Barack Obama is our next president. Thank goodness!
Ayers and Farrakhan and Rev. Wright (who, by the way, spoke a truth whether you people like it or not) will say what they say. It doesn’t matter anymore. Obama will be one of our best presidents.
The best man won.

Posted by: older white woman from the 60's | November 10, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am

True Republicans are not happy about a communist managing to steal the 2008 election through massive fraud (college kids voting multiple times for obama, inmates voting for obama, dead people voting for obama, non-citizens voting for obama, etc.). But the cold comfort for Republicans is that a couple of years from now when obama lays waste to our economy, security, and health care, Republicans can smugly say “I told you so!”.

Posted by: Just wait | November 10, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

To Just Wait,
How inthe world could Obama do any of that it is already done. The economy is in shatters, we are in two wars, and for over 40 million Americans there is no health care. Obama is too late to ruin these things, he can only fix them. Oh my god, what if he fixes this stuff, then does that make us all communists?
The truth about Bill Ayers is this, he was at Obama’s victory celebration in Grant Park. The Secret Service doesn’t play games, if he were considered a domestic terrorist his house would be surrounded and he wouldn’t get within a mile of Obama. What flavor Koolaid have you been drinking?

Posted by: stephen | November 10, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

They emerge and will demand their tithes.
They’ll want what they see they deserve for their support.
Watch.

Posted by: drjohn | November 10, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

If the people whom Bill Ayers is responsible for killing were still around, I bet they would wish he was only a cartoon character. But, no he is a living, breathing, wholly unrepentant (“I only wish we had done more”) terrorist. And all the effort by Barack Obama’s public relations organization, otherwise known as the mainstream media, won’t make it not so.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 10, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

William Ayers dedicated his book “Prairie
Fire” to Sirhan Shirhan, the assassin of Robert Kennedy. For Obama to associate with Ayers AT ALL is the issue that will remain. This election proved that character no longer matters. Race, Money and Power won in 2008.

Posted by: djn | November 10, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

“”Please everyone, Obama should be given every bit of respect, cooperation, and moral support that George Bush was given.
By the way, have you heard? On OBama’s first day in office he is (by executive order) going to cut back on domestic fuel exploration. Change, yeah!”"
So we can just slam on Nobama, crucify his polocies, call him an idiot, and basically make fun of anything he does. Thats the respect and cooperation Obama gave to Bush. So yeah, I look forward to trashing Nobama for the next 4 years on every single polocies he tries to enact, just like the Dems did to him! And beleive me, he will be giving us a lot of ammo with his leftist lib polocies!

Posted by: KPL | November 10, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

I find it appalling that American citizens self-censored themselves in order to help elect a president. Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Tony Rezko and even Michelle Obama kept silent, or were kept silent by the campaign, for most of the election. That is just wrong.
The same people who attacked President Bush at every turn are now demanding that critics keep silent about Obama. Irony, hypocrisy or dangerous censorship? We shall see…

Posted by: Roxie | November 10, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

As an attorney (& retired JAG attorney), I find Andrews comments on law ludicrous. For example, the notion that the child of an American citizen born overseas is not qualified to be the President is imbecilic. “Natural-born” simply means the child is born a citizen, rather than being naturalized. Much as the apostle Paul replied to an official who stated he (the offcial) had purchased his citizenship with a great price, to which Paul replied that he was botn free (or, in other words, a citizen). Yes, citizenship law is that old. There are only two categories of citizenship, those born citizens and those naturalized, not at least three, as Andrew would have us believe (those born citizens in the US, those born citizens outside the US, and those not born citizens. All of this got resolved during the George Romney run for the Republican nomination way back when. (Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.)
Another of Andrew’s malapropisms is even more amusing. He indicates the Obama is a “usurper.” That term is normally used for one who has unlawfully taken the position of a heriditary monarch. There was nothing unlawful about Obama’s election (unlike George W. Bush’s 5-4 margin of victory in 2000.) However, if Andrew was in favor of the imperial presidency of George W. Bush, perhaps that explains why he used the term.

Posted by: R. Musick | November 10, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

@anon,
Why don’t you post some factual links to that.

Posted by: ajax | November 10, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Obama has proved that no matter what color you are or where you come from, you can be whatever you want to be in this Country if you work hard for it. So, Wright and Farrakhan can STOP SPOUTING their stupid Racial Crap. So, let them talk. What comes out of their mouths don’t mean squat anymore.

Posted by: ajax | November 10, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

How about the associations found with Obama’s election opponents? LIke the Reverend Muthee, who gave Palin a ceremony of protection against witches? Or the AIP,a radical secessionist group advocating the overthrow of the federal government? Let’s not forget the anti-Semitic Hagee who plays to Jewish political interests. It speaks a lot that Ayers, Wright and Farakhan were condensed into one article, namely that the effect was intended to be inflammatory. In short, journalism could use an improvement around here.
Are criticisms allowed?

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

For any Sean Hannity loyalist out there, ask him how tha “Stop Obama Express” worked out for him. hahahahah
Conservative Talk Radio and road kill has a lot in common.
It stinks
It’s dead

Posted by: Oval Office Upgrade | November 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

It’s amazing how you neocons are still trying to twist/debunk the truth. Get over it! The world has changed and people are coming together with a common purpose of doing great things to make each and every life fruitful and meaningful.
“Yes we can” make it happen.

Posted by: Your Guide | November 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The media’s behavior in letting Obama off the hook was offensive. The behavior in letting Ayers off the hook is unpardonable. The media had better hope and pray that Obama turns out to be moderate and does not trample on liberty or humanity the way many who have observed him accutely have come to fear based on his authoritarian radical connections. History will not be kind to those who have helped Obama ascend to power if even half of what is feared comes to pass.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen X | November 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

“If the people whom Bill Ayers is responsible for killing…”
There are no such people.
Professor Ayers has less innocent blood on his hands than the Ohio National Guard.
The Federal Government dismissed all charges against him. Granted, they did so to avoid revealing just how blatently they were violating American law and civil rights in their illegal harassment of activist groups in the sixties… but that was their choice. And among the charges in the docket, there was not a single case of injury or death. Not one.
Considering Professor Ayers’ considerable accomplishments in the past 30 years, I’d be quite pleased to have him as a neighbor. And the area schools would be overjoyed to have so tireless and selfless an advocate on their behalf. He has earned the numerous awards and accolades bestowed upon him.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 10, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Why don’t conservative preachers (Falwell and Robertson, who had Bush’s ears) ever get the same scrutiny? They’ve made statements that are every bit as crazy as anything Wright has said, but they largely escaped being turned into cartoon characters the same way he has.

Posted by: Howard, NYC | November 10, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

My question to all Democrats (including media establishment) is, and will continue to be, “What do you intend to do with Farrakhan, Rezco, Ayers, Wright and Obama’s other assorted and sundry misfits?”
They are now mainstream Democrats, thank you very little. You have embraced them along with YOUR candidate, Obama. So will you now try to give them a type of respectability that they do not deserve, or admit that they are thugs and distance yourselves from them? The world will be watching.

Posted by: So Now What, Democrats? | November 10, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

I don’t quite get it that Ayers is described as emerging after election. He certainly emerged by association prior to the election. According to Newsweek, several weeks back when Palin was invoking him along with the word, socialist, and a few other special associations, death threats to Obama spiked. I think I speak for most people when I stress that the hot buttons for Ayers, Wright an Farakhan have been overused and it’s time to move on past the names and issues.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

keep it up Repubs…….. those guys can be yer ‘holy 3′ to keep you warm while you figure out how to get elected again with yer nutty views before the next century comes around.
Jindal/Palin in 2012… lookin’ forward to it.. ;-)

Posted by: dewde | November 10, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I think Ayers, Wright, and Farrakhan forgot one thing.
Obama will desperately want to be re-elected in 2012.
He doesn’t want to be a failure.
So his old buddies from Chicago are still going to have to watch what they say.
Getting Obama Re-elected is not going to be so exciting to college kids, etc. especially if he breaks promises and makes unpopular decisions.

Posted by: sam | November 10, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I think what got these three guys is that they all demonstrated a “punk mentality”. Ayers is a classic, rich kid, decides to blow up America to get his way. Biden has a bit of the punk in him – that is how his mouth gets him in trouble.
The worry among the people on the right was that Obama would be not the first African American president, but the first punk president. I think Clinton was there first – exposing himself to women with no support network. Obama is not that kind of lunatic.

Posted by: etothex | November 10, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Obama will forever be linked to these radical jerks.
He will have to distance himself if he wants to be re-elected.
Voters may not be so forgiving in 2012.
BO won’t be seen as a messiah, or the guy making history.
By 2012 he will be wrinkled, pot-bellied, and balding from all the stress.

Posted by: bailey | November 10, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

BHO and his creepy friends.
All of them with that same smug expression, obnoxious, arrogant, radical.
BO either liked their message, their company or both–why else would he stay around them for so long?

Posted by: meggie | November 10, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Tres Stooges + 1

Posted by: hulagate | November 10, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

congratulations to you obama voters. now you can savor the victory of being able to use live embryonic stem cells for research, allowing fifteen-year old children to have abortions without notifying their parents, killing unborn babies in any trimester, even late term. success! now the majority of people live in a godless society. we should all be proud. God help us all.

Posted by: sara | November 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

I am eager to debate Wright at his choosing of place and time. His complaints that his remarks were taken out of context are fodder for fools. As Wright knows, all Christian teaching must be compatible with scripture. Yet Wright said “God damn America.” As any half-educated preacher knows, saying things that only God can say is blasphemy. God has not damned America. So, Wright cannot damn America. Some defenders of Wright have appealed to “Old Testament” writings of prophets such as Amos who said something like “God damn Israel.” However, the defense of Wright ignores the fact that his context was entirely different from Amos’ context. How do I know? Wright sold me the DVD of his sermon. To speak for God is blasphemy; that is, to present your words as the words of God is blasphemy, unless the words are the words of God. Wright promoted himself to the office of prophet. That should be deeply offensive to any Christians. All should shun Wright.

Posted by: johnmarshall1 | November 10, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

The very worst result of this election is the mainstreaming of Wright and Farrakhan. Wright is no Christian, as my earlier post shows. Farrakhan is a Muslim, as he claims the title of the leader of America’s “Black Muslims.” Both of these groups are highly confused about Christian scripture and religion in general. They should be criticized for what they are; splinter groups that worship the narcissistic personalities of their leaders.

Posted by: johnmarshall1 | November 10, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

sam
hopes this president fails, since bush has been such a failure.
but if obama fails trying to get us out of this mess, the country fails,
is that what you really want, sam?

Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Again, I’m disappointed that Ayers, Farakhan and Wright are all lumped together in one report. It’s typical of Limbaugh or Hannity to combine the three controversial figures into one report, or more accurately, diatribe. But it’s unusual they’d be presented together in one mainstream report, as if they should be rehashed ad infinitum. It also makes for more than the average incendiary postings.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

“God Damn America” is no more or less offensive, from a purely theological standpoint, than “God Bless America”. Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts. Next.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Please everyone, Obama should be given every bit of respect, cooperation, and moral support that George Bush was given.
Posted by: rick g | Nov 10, 2008 4:36:14 AM
That’s a good one. Got any others?

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 10, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

“Question with boldness even the existence of a god.” – Thomas Jefferson
Every man “ought to be protected in worshiping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience.” – George Washington
“Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon, than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness, that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.” – Thomas Paine
“Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth.” – Thomas Jefferson
“During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.” – James Madison
“The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.” – James Madison
The last point I make is there is no place for religion in politics. There never has been. Regardless of ones personal beliefs, mixing religion and politics ultimately produces discord for those disenfranchised by the current regime.
And judging by the views expressed here by a few that some people are not “Christians” I would ask if that is somehow a requirement for an elected official or simply a personal view?

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

So many people here don’t even know what they are talking about. Instead of just accepting the MSM’s ‘sound bytes’ of Rev. Wright, I researched the Trinity website and listened to his sermons in their entireties finding that the MSM did a terrible disservice to a good man.
Not only does he possess a superior intellect, but he is witty and charming as well. He also appeared on Public TV with Bill Moyers and was wonderful. Furthermore, he served our country as a Marine and was highly decorated. He has also served his community every day of his adult life until just recently when he retired. He has helped those in his community more than I bet anyone reading this post has helped his or hers.
The MSM has much maligned him and caused him to be vilified when he deserved none of that negativity. How many of you can say you have served your country as well as helped your community to the extent he has his? I doubt any of you [especially the negative posters] have done even a tiny portion of what this man has done, so until you do, I would advise you to stop hating him. Until you learn about him and listen to his sermons in their entireties, instead of snippets of sound bytes, please refrain from saying terrible things about him.
He is a good man and does not deserve the treatment you have shown here.
And no, I am not black nor am I young.

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 10, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

congratulations to you Republican voters..
your party has proven itself once again to be a self serving corrupt ideology only concerned with winning……..your ‘leaders’ are reviled equally around the world as they are here in America..
…continue to narrow your base to religious nuts
and alienate the rest of America…

Posted by: Mr. T | November 10, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

“Democratic” writes:
This is what I love about America. Ayers, Wright & Farrakhan all have a perfect right to have their own opinion and the perfect right to express it. I love how the neocons peg them as unAmerican for expressing their opinions.
****************************************
Wow…….where to begin with this blurb of hypocrisy. Perhaps the “fairness” doctrine??? I guess Hannity, Limbaugh, Savage, et al. are great Americans for expressing their opinions??? Too bad the left doesn’t see it that way. They defend Ayers, Wright and Farrakan and then want to shut down talk radio. Typical blatant hyporcrisy from the enlightened “elite” who are ever learning and never able to come to the truth.

Posted by: centurion666 | November 10, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Yeah, the guy from NYC who says Falwell and other fundamentalists hould be scrutinized like Farakhan, Wright,etc.
Christian Conservatives and Republicans in general and even some Dems don’t believe that America should be DAMNED, sir.
Obama will spend the next 4 years being led by the hand.
This will be a very confusing, unorganized administration, due to the innumerable power plays, and demands from various militant/extreme factions, eco people, baby killer proponents, and those who love the socialist doctrine.
I am armed and I will defend my family.

Posted by: Me | November 10, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Ayers, Wright, and Farrakhan – evil men, all three.

Posted by: Carlos | November 10, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Too bad for the Republicans they’ve isolated themselves in the delusions of the extremist right wing who keep flapping their obsessive minds over non-existent issues.
Some on here are still grasping in hopes that somehow trying to smear hate on Reverend Wright and tie that to President-elect Obama will change the political situation in the United States.
Listen, despite the right wing pulling out unfair, isolated sound clips from Wright’s sermons (listen to the whole sermons, they’re decent and fair) – and repeating those unfair clips on an endless loop on FOX news, etc. – the American public didn’t buy the nonsense.
Those days are over with. That is what is so pathetic about the right wing haters and smearers on these blogs. You are as obsolete as the Model T. And not nearly as decent.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

‘centurion666′
you can keep the ‘truth’, truth for the religious is a long way from ‘truth’ to the secular…..
I’ll settle for accuracy, intelligence and reason
“ME”
re: ‘I am armed’
I hope ‘they’ come and get you so you can fulfill
your angry dreams.

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Pefros,
To bad for all America.

Posted by: Me | November 10, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I think what the Republicans need to do is include everybody and not just the religious right. I guess they will need to figure that one out for themselves.

Posted by: Jwench | November 10, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Thank Obama (no not God) that Obama was elected. When I voted for him he became my new saviour. We need to change everything, because everything is wrong. Obama will fix it all. I don’t have to worry about putting gas in my car or paying my mortgage.

Posted by: Bob | November 10, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

TO InWantofaUnitedNation
Are you saying that Wright did NOT say “God damn America”???? I heard that part over and over. Its kind of hard to say that the media took that out-of-context.

Posted by: Colorado | November 10, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

pefros, well said!
We move forward as a nation united regardless of our color, religion, or ethnic background.
People need to accept the fact that a new dawn has come to America, there is no turning back and history will judge this election much as the world already has to be a defining moment in our time.

Posted by: Mark | November 10, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Are you saying that Wright did NOT say “God damn America”???? I heard that part over and over. Its kind of hard to say that the media took that out-of-context.
Posted by: Colorado | Nov 10, 2008 12:38:31 PM
Did you ever listen to the entire thing? IF the answer is no, then yes it could have been taken out of context.
That is like Obama’s quote of “spread the wealth”. IF you look at the whole quote and not just that snippet it has an entirely different meaning.

Posted by: Jwench | November 10, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Maybe I’m missing the intellectual subtleties, but in what context, exactly, would the phrase “God damn America” be appropriate?

Posted by: JC | November 10, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Unless you heard the entire thing, how can you comment as to whether his use of GD America was appropriate. I have not seen the entire thing, just the snippets.
My suggestion if you have questions about it is view the entire thing and then make your comments.

Posted by: Jwench | November 10, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

JC:
All of the sound clips you’ve heard on Reverend Wright were taken out of context and played in an unfair way on endless repeating loops on FOX and similar outlets. Most of the entire sermon is available on you tube.
It’s a long and detailed sermon – a fair and decent assessment of the difference between the righteousness of governments and the righteousness of God.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

For people who take those clips out of context and use them in an immoral attempt to smear Reverend Wright with hate . .. and then smear Obama as well . . .. I say God damn them.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Me -
“I am armed and will defend my family.”
From whom?! Please advise the rest of us as to your general vicinity so that we can do our best to avoid it.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 10, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Too bad for the Republicans they’ve isolated themselves in the delusions of the extremist right wing who keep flapping their obsessive minds over non-existent issues.
Some on here are still grasping in hopes that somehow trying to smear hate on Reverend Wright and tie that to President-elect Obama will change the political situation in the United States.
Listen, despite the right wing pulling out unfair, isolated sound clips from Wright’s sermons (listen to the whole sermons, they’re decent and fair) – and repeating those unfair clips on an endless loop on FOX news, etc. – the American public didn’t buy the nonsense.
Those days are over with. That is what is so pathetic about the right wing haters and smearers on these blogs. You are as obsolete as the Model T. And not nearly as decent.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

The Republicans and other
detractors are still at
it – trying to associate
BO with Wright’s “GD
America” comment.
BO was influenced by what
was best about Wright. The
title of one of BO’s books
The Audacity of Hope is
actually the title of one
of Reverend Wright’s sermons.
Ayers is now an education
expert and a Distinguished
Professor of Education. BO
has known him only slightly
and that too only in Ayers’s
present status as a university
professor.

Posted by: anon | November 10, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Some of the comments here and elsewhere are funny. “A new dawn for America” “America has changed”. The sad but funny thing is, oportunities have been there for all Americans for decades. Those barriers and ceilings were all an illusion the whole time. I guess some people just need to have symbols or the “right” people telling them things are different in order for them to believe it. Now the problem is those same people who couldn’t see their own freedom all along are now going to have the wrong expectations.

Posted by: Doug | November 10, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

You are known by the company you keep. Ayers, Wright and Farrhakah are America hating radicals and Obama is their student. Obama supports abortion on demand. There will be in an increase in abortions mostly on black babies thanks to the kind, loving O. who would not want his daughter “punished with a baby”. I guess his teen aged mother was punished with him! He is a scary, scary man.

Posted by: alice L. | November 10, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Here we go again… The lefties are attacking conservatives with ad hominem attacks and blaming us for everything that doesn’t go right for their “savior” BO. Well, sorry to say this, but BO brought a lot of this stuff on himself. And these people are STILL lying about their alliances with him. Ayers and Obama are NOT just passing acquaintances regardless of how many times they try to say differently. Obama even said in his own book that he was very deliberate about the people he associated with so he would not be seen as a “sell-out”. He proudly listed all the radical leftist groups he allied himself with. Still, you folks act like the right made it all up.
It is sad when people live in such denial.

Posted by: Janine | November 10, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

I guess people missed the speech where Obama specifically disavowed Wright’s more colorful rhetoric. Too bad. It was a very good speech.
He never had more than a peripheral involvement with Ayers, Fox’s paranoid delusions nothwithstanding, and no connection at all with Farrakhan.
The Swiftboat has run agound, but they’re still gunning the throttle. Priceless.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 10, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

WOW!!! There are frightening people out there! The U.S. did NOT pull out of Vietnam because of what people like Ayers did or said. You guys are rewriting history!!! You forget that LBJ (a Democrat) kept the war going because he had financial interests in keeping it lingering. His business was in tractors and other heavy equipment that were sent over there and paid for by our tax dollars. Nixon was the one who pulled us out–after we had been stuck in that quagmire by two Democrat Presidents. The radicals like Ayers and Wright are opportunists–they are NOT heroes by any means. Communism kills more people and creates more poverty and suffering than any other political ideology. When are you going to learn from history???

Posted by: Janine | November 10, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Doug:
As an example – in the past the American public might have fallen for the smear and fear campaigns used by the Republican right wing.
It is apparent the smear and fear campaign did not work this time.
This type of peeling away of the layers of lies is crucial to the way society is evolving.
Each layer peeled back can be seen as a new dawn and this election and the total failure of the smear and fear campaign is without a doubt a bright day.
There will be many more new dawns.
And each new day brings new work.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“The Swiftboat has run agound, but they’re still gunning the throttle. Priceless.”
Exactly Sam.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I looked at Mike’s video and it is just a bunch of radical commie propaganda that has no basis in reality. The U.S. has created more prosperity and freedom in the world than anyone else. The poorest of the poor in the U.S. would be considered filthy rich in most other countries–especially when compared to the Communist regimes and brutal dictatorships of the Southern Hemisphere. Still, people want the government to “give” them everything even though, in the long run, they will end up with much less than when they started. Yes, we want MUCH SMALLER government. Government is the problem–NOT the solution. Economics have proved time and again…when you do not punish the achievers and let them have the freedom to earn what they are worth, then EVERYBODY prospers. Sadly, most of the people I see here have limited educations–they have been indoctrinated to believe the pablum of the left. They are looking for what is “fair” in an unfair world. They don’t see that conservatives are the most generous and giving people. The left instead look for all that is negative and have a guilt and self-loathing. So instead of appreciating what this country has given them and allowing people to voluntarily give of themselves, they want to steal what others have rightfully earned and give it to people who won’t or can’t earn it themselves. If you look at the top 10 poorest cities in the U.S., you will see that they have been run by solely by Democrats for long periods of time. Democrat policies do NOTHING to help the poor–they perpetuate poverty.

Posted by: Janine | November 10, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Janine
re: The lefties are attacking conservatives….”
not really…..
Republicans are doing a great job eviscerating themselves……. Dems only need to get out of the way and watch the conservative carnage…

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

janine:
re” They don’t see that conservatives are the most generous and giving people.
thanks for that, reading that started the best laughing fit I’ve had in a while !!

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Here’s what Sarah Palin had to say about why the Republicans lost the election:
Question: Why do you think your campaign lost?
Palin: I think the Republican ticket represented too much of the status quo, too much of what had gone on in these last eight years, that Americans were kind of shaking their heads like going, wait a minute, HOW DID WE RUN UP A 10 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT IN A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION? How have there been blunders with war strategy under a Republican administration?

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Doug @ 1:39 pm, It’s clearly not a an “illusion” that behavior and actual practices lag significantly behind decades old legislation. I’m not poor or a person of color, but I can tell you that discrimination and its impacts are clearly observable. And it certainly still effects women, the disabled and aged, too. The illusionary is to deny that socio-economic obstacles, discriminatory practices and racism no longer exist.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

pefros:
Palin is correct. Bush “lost”, not McCain and Palin.
.

Posted by: Billw | November 10, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Billw . . . I would say Bush and the Republicans lost; the Republicans chose Bush as leader.
And McCain and Palin lost as well .. . unfortunately, McCain’s campaign chose to use the same fear and smear, Swift boat, Rove tactics Bush and Cheney used . . . . and the public hated it.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

.
Obama “lucked” his way to the presidency. His Wright baggage didn’t hit the news until after the first nine primaries. After that it was nip and tuck and Clinton almost won anyway. In the general election McCain and Palin had the Bush millstone around their necks. With the broken economy and the Iraq war, the only word many voters needed to hear was “change”. and Obama owned that word. Obama owes his win to Bush the idiot.
.

Posted by: Billw | November 10, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

“President-elect Barack Obama comes away from Election Day with a 68% “favorable rating,” the latest USA TODAY/Gallup Poll shows. That’s up from 62% who said they think favorably of him just before the election.”

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

“Palin is correct. Bush “lost”, not McCain and Palin.”
Aaaahh the delusional freepers.
Bush lost. McCain lost. Palin lost big time.
Republicans lost on election day.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 10, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Billy – Bush lost, not McCain and Palin.
How is that? Bush hasn’t run since 2004. McCain and Palin simply lost, contrary to Palin’s not too articulate spin.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

“WOW!!! There are frightening people out there! The U.S. did NOT pull out of Vietnam because of what people like Ayers did or said. You guys are rewriting history!!! You forget that LBJ (a Democrat) kept the war going because he had financial interests in keeping it lingering. His business was in tractors and other heavy equipment that were sent over there and paid for by our tax dollars.”
LBJ was out in 68. The war went on for 5 more years.
“Nixon was the one who pulled us out–after we had been stuck in that quagmire by two Democrat Presidents”
ROFLMAO.
Nixon saw the last big build up, the expansion of the war into Cambodia and eventually pulled combat forces out 5 years after he was elected but this is the Democrats fault?
The lesson for the day? Freepers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 10, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

“Maybe I’m missing the intellectual subtleties, but in what context, exactly, would the phrase “God damn America” be appropriate?”
Discussing slavery perhaps? Maybe Jim Crow?

Posted by: Ryan C | November 10, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

JC
re: “but in what context, exactly, would the phrase “God damn America” be appropriate?”
you seem to think that America can’t make a mistake or errors in judgment and policy….. it has, it does, and it will again…: the question is will we ever learn from the past and wise up.
Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse
KKK
guantanamo prison
starting a war by mistake: ie. Iraq
oppression of minorities

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

“It’s all guilt by association,” Ayers said. “They made me into a cartoon character — they threw me up onstage just to pummel me.”
Yeah. Just to pummel you, Bill.
And no doubt Bush made you trample that US flag on 9-11-2001.

Posted by: drjohn | November 10, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Blue–
Laugh all you want, but it is true. Conservatives give much more to charity and otehr causes than liberals do. Liberals only vote for higher taxes so they can force people to give up their hard earned money to pay for fat bureaucracies that are supposed to help others. Most of that money goes to the bureaucrats though–very little of it goes to the people it is supposed to help.

Posted by: Janine | November 10, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Obama is hardly a black man. He is only 6% black first of all. He never lived in poverty–he had a much more privileged upbringing than most people I know and I came from an upper middle class suburb! He knows very little about black culture even though he has tried to insinuate himself into some of these radical groups like Black Nationalists, etc. I have more black culture in me! And his ancestors were NEVER slaves of the U.S. as some people are trying to imply. His father came over here from Kenya, protested a bit and sired a son, and then left. However, my people were enslaved by folks from his part of the world–the Moors overtook Spain. So, I don’t want want to hear the stupid lies and propaganda about this man. He is an elitest and knows nothing of economics.

Posted by: JBC | November 10, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Obsms bought the presidency, and had his left wing media freinds touting him at every turn. Well,,,,these people will get what they want Obama bought the Presidency but he will govern with stealth.. Stealing your freedoms, your guns, your right to free speach, your right to free elections etc.etc. Look at Venezuela and weep.

Posted by: Valerie Tarantolo | November 10, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

JBC: “Obama is hardly a black man.”
Well, the voters have now had their say, and they’ve collectively decided that what your nonsensical posts about the president-elect aren’t worth the bandwidth they consume.
Carlos: “Ayers, Wright, and Farrakhan – evil men, all three.”
And an ignorant man, you are.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | November 10, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

“Obsms bought the presidency”
With money provided by the clear majority of voters that elected him. Tidy, that.
“Stealing your freedoms”
My freedoms have already been trampled by the Bush administration’s high-handed disregard for Constitutional rights and protections in the name of “national security”. Repression is a trademark of social conservatism.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 10, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I don’t think Bush-bashing would have been a smart way to win elections. The major factors which tilted the election included: a bad economy and the damage done by the media in not being neutral. Further, the McCain campaign should have been little more aggressive and consistent in telling what they stand for while exposing the other candidate for who they rally are! Considering such a backdrop, the fact that 58 million people stood against Obama_Biden should serve as a strong testament of support for the McCain-Palin camp and for American values.
John.

Posted by: John Mathew | November 10, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

President-elect Barack Obama comes away from Election Day with a 68% “favorable rating,” the latest USA TODAY/Gallup Poll shows. That’s up from 62% who said they think favorably of him just before the election.

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Can we get over the culture wars?
So far as I can tell, there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between Wright, Farrakhan, Ayers, Hagee, Falwell, Robertson, and Palin’s pastor. Whatever their starting point on the “political spectrum,” they’ve all ended up as “agents of intolerance” who are absolutely certain that they’re right and that God’s on their side.
Lincoln said, “I don’t claim that God’s on my side. Rather I pray that I’m on his.” Humility and self reflection tend to rub the sharp edges off of the political extremities. This country could use some more of it.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

JBC
well…that was smoldering heaping portion of…..
… wow… ‘choice’ stuff…..
I guess it’s too bad for you that Obama doesn’t fit into your racial stereotypes

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

John
re: ’58 million people stood against Obama_Biden should serve as a strong testament of support for the McCain-Palin camp and for American values.”
McCain’s & Palin’s ‘American values’ were rejected by the majority….. ie: They Lost!
it’s that kind of ‘holier than thou’ Americana that also insured their loss. Most of the folks claiming to be ‘experts on American values’ wouldn’t know them if they saw them tatooed on their foreheads.
The more you devise a divisive political party based on self assumed moral and political superiority, the more you guarantee your future losses.

Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Right on, Tapper. Congrats on your new White House gig. Respect.

Posted by: Karen Otravez | November 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

How about his illegal auntie?

Posted by: Fakebama | November 10, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Bill Ayers has been acting as an advisor to Obama all throughout his campaign. The Obamas have been speaking with Ayers and Dohrn several times a week. This whole story about how they’re not friends, they don’t “pal around” is crap. They’ve been palling around for 20 years and it’s not going to stop now. Ayers will continue to be an Obama advisor even after Obama’s inauguration

Posted by: EyeDoc | November 10, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Yeah righ eyedoc, where’s your proof.

Posted by: Just Wondering | November 10, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Radosh also, upon the death of Studs Terkel called him a communist: “To be completely accurate, Terkel should be seen as the quintessential representative of Popular Front communism, circa mid 1940’s through the current era.” Terkel is a man who wrote accurate and moving books about working men and women in America – and a beautiful book about older people looking back on their friendships and their lives. Not commies. Construction workers. Nurses. Delivery men. My 94-year old mother, who was about as far from a communist as you could get, loved them.
But it would be nicer if he would give us a little introduction to the people he quotes. Only a few days in the press corps – and his bias is already tranparent. I like that. It makes it a lot easier to understand why someone would still be writing about Bill Ayers. Jake, I hate to break it to you, but neoconservatism is dead. It would make people very happy – if those of us without trust funds were not going to pay for their mistakes for the rest of our lives. Do you also believe that the war ended in Iraq with Mission Accomplished? Or have you forgotten the war? The ones the neocons brought us?

Posted by: Mara | November 10, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

These bullroar smears about Ayers and Obama from the extremist right wing didn’t work during the election campaign and they won’t work now.
“The Swiftboat has run aground, but they’re still gunning the throttle. Priceless.”

Posted by: pefros | November 10, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

*BUCK ROGER – from a prev. post..
“The top four taxpayers had a combined income of $69 billion, more than some countries make, in the year 2000. These individuals were on the receiving end of tax cuts in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The wealthiest .2% (about 250,000 households) saved almost $35 billion dollars in taxes. The top 20% of Americans saved just over $200 billion each year in taxes..”
THIS is the legacy of Reagen; trickle down economics are responsible for the liquidation of our manufacturing sector, loss of middle class jobs which sustained a nation, and the continued loss of real income by America’s workers – the finance industry doesn’t employ people with HS educations, however Walmart and McDonald’s are doing great you’ll notice – Obama has his work cut out for him, and yeah, he may fail – however, are we supposed to put the future of our country in the hands of the party which had it’s hand on the tiller during the Great Depression, the Saving & Loan bailout of 1989, AND the current economic disaster?? Three for three?!? As far as tax hikes, borrowing money from foreign banks to fund tax “cuts” for millionaires is the GOP’s legacy to today’s working families – who do you think is going to pay for socializing our banks, the French? once again, the american people have to bail out another REPUBLICAN President..

Posted by: paulserr | November 10, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

These bullroar leftist radical smears about Senator Obama from the extremist right wing didn’t work during the election campaign and they won’t work now.
“The Swiftboat has run aground, but they’re still gunning the throttle. Priceless.”

Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

America….are you happy that you elected the most liberal, unexperienced, socialist politician in the U.S. to be president ?
All of the Obama lovers out there who make excuses for him regarding his past associations and the comments he has made about his desire for certain agendas.. you are totally delusional and YOU PEOPLE are the deranged ones..
America will get what they deserve. Obama will hand you payback for electing him president. America will never be the same again.
Wait and see.

Posted by: ml | November 11, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am

Obama’s komrade chickens were roosting behind the scenes the whole time? I’m shocked!

Posted by: sara | November 11, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

I read this story yesterday, and I’m still reeling. I won’t blame ABC and Jake for running it, but can’t believe these 3 guys have the gall to come out like this.
Farrakhan – Not even worth a comment, based on his well-documented rants.
Ayers – It’s time to pimp a reprint of an ill-timed book release from 2001? So, we should take him seriously? The sad thing is people will buy the book to a) see if he’s as evil as Hannity, et al said…b) was a true crusader of justice as he proclaims…c) what his life on the run was like. Only in America.
Wright – Complains about his life’s work being reduced to a caricature? Can someone please roll the tape of him in front of the National Press Corps this summer? Who made him act like a loon there?

Posted by: FishMonger | November 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Jake, the election is over. Can we move on? The majority of us do not have vote based on the perceived ideologies of the candidates. We are too busy surviving. Those of us over 70 are not easily scared off by fanatical demonizing on either side. We have seen too much. I am white, Catholic, female, still working full time because I can’t afford to retire. I have loved this country, been overwhelmed with pride at its moments of greatness and hated some of the things it has done. That is part of being real. I voted for Obama because he is an intelligent, reflective thinker who challenges us to be just, generous, compassionate and collaborative with the rest of the planet. If McCain had won, I would have gotten over myself and supported him because this is my country.

Posted by: jhop | November 11, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Obama…not my president…not now….not ever!

Posted by: Sam Deakins | November 11, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

These attempts at smears against Senator Obama from the daffy right wing didn’t work during the election campaign and they won’t work now.
“The Swiftboat has run aground, but they’re still gunning the throttle. Priceless.”

Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

People are commenting all the time lately, Obama this, Obama that, your going to regret ever electing him, all kinds of crap. Than they talk about who’s going to run in 2012. Let me tell ya, you all might as well be thinking about 2016 or 2020 because with the attitude you now have, which is the same attitude that voted you out of office your going to have a hard time convincing the people you have any kind of reason to be given the opportunity to lead.
Remember something called the “contact for America”, remember how that went over. Eight years of Bush and you really think the American people are going to turn around anytime soon. You might as well start thinking of a way to steal an election because your certainly not going to win one anytime soon.

Posted by: Mark | November 12, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.