‘I, Barack Hussein Obama, Do Solemnly Swear…’
The President-elect didn’t like to be referred to as "BHO," preferring "BO," believe it or not.
Such was the sensitivity surrounding his Muslim middle name.
(You may recall our blog post "Obama Distances Self from Own Middle Initial." As far as I know, the "H" was never officially thrown under the proverbial bus.)
But the Los Angeles Times editorial board wonders if "I, George Walker Bush…" will be followed by "I, Barack Hussein Obama…"
"To capitalize on anti-Muslim sentiment," the Times recalls, "detractors took to calling him ‘Barack Hussein Obama.’ … Stripped of such evil intent, the ‘Hussein’ in Obama’s full name shouldn’t be taboo. Nor should the idea of an openly Muslim citizen deciding to seek the presidency."
The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life last year released a poll indicating that American Muslims are "largely assimilated, happy with their lives and moderate with respect to many of the issues that have divided Muslims and Westerners around the world" and that "Muslim Americans reject Islamic extremism by larger margins than do Muslim minorities in Western European countries."
Says the Times: "The way to increase those numbers is to make clear that an American with an Islamic faith — or an Islamic name — is not a second-class citizen. When the new president takes the oath, he should say, loudly and proudly: ‘I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.’"
What do you think he should do? What do you think he will do?
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Well, he does say that he wants to be everybody’s President. Why then should he shy away from it? I say, go for BHO
Posted by: Ramki | November 30, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
i think if he is “embarrased” by his middle name, he should legally drop it. if he dosent do that, then i believe there is no harm in saying it. but i believe he will not have it said when it comes time to be sworn in because he has no backbone.
Posted by: tim | November 30, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
He’ll use his full name. That’s required. Though I do think one of the previous PEs used just his “common name.” Aha, it was Jimmy Carter (did a search) but that was BECAUSE the oathgiver said “repeat after me, I Jimmy Carter”…poor guy was probably shut down and did exactly as he was told.
Can’t imagine Obama being that nervous and humble. No, can’t imagine any uncertainty at all. After all, he’s probably been practicing in front of a mirror for five years or so.
Posted by: Laughing Cynic | November 30, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
It should be what he wants it to be.
Remember, Carter was sworn in as “Jimmy Carter”, not “James Earle Carter”, so dropping the full legal name at the swearing in is not without precedent.
Posted by: xaixxx | November 30, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Be honor of the name that his mother had given him!!!!
Say it aloud!!!
I’m AMERICAN and PROUD!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 30, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
The New York Times had the most powerful election-night lede. It was simply, “Barack Hussein Obama has been elected the 44th president of the United States.” Most other papers dropped the middle name, but the Times got it right. We all know by now his middle name is Hussein. We elected him anyway.
We didn’t mind, neither should he.
Posted by: big truck | November 30, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
It’s understandable that he dropped Hussein during the campaign…He stopped going by “Barry” when he got older so I’m sure that he’ll be sworn in as Barack Hussein Obama…The full name is symbolic in many ways when put in light of the villains of the past decade. America once locked up Japanese Americans during WWII…The country is proud of our progress..In fact, he should use his full given name and then send the inauguration audio tape to Ayman al-Zawahri of Al-queda!
Posted by: TruthHurts | November 30, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Be proud of his name and say it loud and clear. A christian name does not a christian make, and many in the Far East takes on a “western” name but that does not make them caucasians either. So what’s wrong with any name that people have. I have known plenty of people with good “christian” names, but they are some of the worst people you can ever know. Many others with ethnic or Islamic names are some of the best people you can ever meet. It’s just a name folks, it’s what’s inside you that matters, not the feathers you adorn yourself with.
Posted by: Sareena Jones | November 30, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
He should use his middle name. We are a great country that elected a black man with a middle name Hussein. We should all be proud and he should too! We love Barack Hussein Obama!
Posted by: Louise Riley | November 30, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
It’s not the name of a dictator in the Middle-East, it’s not the connection to the Islamic radicals.
It’s a name that embodies his multi-cultural heritage, and is his father’s name- a name shared by many Muslims and people of Arab-descent around the world, not something to be demonized.
To those people who like to post Barack HUSSEIN Obama (emphasis on capitals) while describing his failings, and then playing all innocent and going, “Huh? We can’t use his middle-name?” when it’s pathetically obvious the fear-mongering they’re pushing, GROW UP:
Barack Hussein Obama is the 44th President of the United States of America.
Posted by: Grey Matter | December 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
He should be sworn in by his legal name as is proper. Let’s not get into “initializing” like with GWB; we did not refer to Bill Clinton as WJC or worse, BJC. “Obama” resonates on its own. I think referring to him as “the O” will catch on just like we refer to this Bush as “Dubya”
Posted by: gerry | December 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Grey Matter, I did indeed end up voting for Barack Obama, as a protest vote against the remaining vestiges of racism in our society. And since, I have been delightfully pleased about the direction Obama appears to be headed, and have admitted that my concerns have not been realized to date, although I reserve the right be critical as I see fit. My opinion on this story is that it is a non-story, and we need to get on with the business of governing, and move far beyond the culture wars. There’s serious business to be done.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Not only should he be sworn in with his FULL name, he should sign all official documents with it also. Thank you very much!!!
Posted by: maximus | December 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
WestCoastMessenger,
I’m glad you kept an open mind.
On these boards and other blogs there are lots of people spewing rubbish and they like to capitalize the “Hussein” and ask whether Obama was born in Kenya and his birth cert is fake, blah, blah (Actually, why would a heavily pregnant young woman travel to Kenya- if there were flights there to begin with in the 1960s- there was quite a bit of unrest). I’m tired of this. Those morons trying to take the birth cert thing to the Supreme Court apparently haven’t gotten the memo that the next President has a huge mess to fix.
I agree with you, we need to stop the culture wars now. Some of the detractors should give Obama a chance to be sworn in and prove himself before going on a melancholic tirade about how he is going to run the country into the ground when he hasn’t even been inaugurated yet.
Posted by: Grey Matter | December 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Interesting. i have been thinking just a little bit abt this subject since his election. I didn’t think the option was there to truncate his name. But i have to say I will lose a fraction of my respect for him if he decides to go without his middle name. As somebody said, his middle name was somewhat disadvantageous for him during the campaign, but he has nothing to lose my using it now. The American people elected him with his full name. I think he should show them some respect by acknowledging that. Not to mention the message he needs to send out that having a Muslim name or being Muslim are ok in America. Absolutely nothing wrong with either concept!
Posted by: Question | December 1, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
jpt,
He should make sure they use his full legal name. Barrack Hussein Obama
and that is just what i think he will do.
he is chicken if he does anything else.
Posted by: sugar | December 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
The comic Lenny Bruce once said you take the poison out of the word by using it repetitively. He was referring to his use of racial slurs at the time. By the same token, I think some fear can be mollified from Obama’s name by using Hussein. I hope to see and hear it more.
Posted by: kat | December 1, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Hmm, I do agree.
I say, say the Hussein LOUD AND CLEAR.
Let those Al-Qaeda terrorists be in a muddle after their potential recruits hear the President of the country that is their sworn enemy has a name of Muslim and Arab origins- and maybe isn’t all that different from them, after all.
Posted by: Grey Matter | December 1, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
I think obama’s mother and grandmother will be proud when they hear him repeat his full three names when sworn in.
hussein-small, good, handsome one.
( well, he looks alright)
Posted by: sugar | December 1, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
i hope everyone can appreciate the fact that this is being floated by the media to the public, to see just how people feel about him using his three names. at least this is what i think.
Posted by: sugar | December 1, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Sugar,
The Media? Paving his way??? Nooooo.
They’re kinda like the petal-droppers in a royal parade.
Posted by: Laughing Cynic | December 1, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Two things to keep in mind…
First off, let’s all note for the record that both Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan were sworn in without their middle names, so it’s neither unprecedented nor even unusual.
Secondly, it is as frustrating as it is sad that the name Hussein has taken on such a negative connotation, when it is equally deserving of a positive one – as in the belated King Hussein of Jordan, who was a courageous man of peace. (The media has very been remiss in this regard.)
That said, while it’s President-elect Obama’s prerogative to do whatever he wants, and either use his middle name or not (a decision he shouldn’t be faulted for either way), it would certainly send a powerfully resonant message to the world if he would use his full name.
“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”
Posted by: Robogeek | December 1, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Laughing Cynic,
I, for one, would be mighty glad if we could get rid of the negative connotations of being a Muslim or having a Muslim name.
The only ones who deserve the crap thrown at them are Al-Qaeda, not ordinary Muslims.
Posted by: Grey Matter | December 1, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
First of all America is not a state religion country like Saudi Arabia where everyone is considre Muslims. It makes no sense if someone middle names is either Hussein, Abubacar or even Mohammed. Moreover, there a lot of people in the world today with muslim names but they are CHRISTAINS. I think, we as Americans should not judge people by their names. Thanks.
Posted by: I.A.T.SMITH | December 1, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am
I absolutely think he should proudly and loudly say ” Barack Hussein Obama”
No doubt about that one.
Posted by: Rocky | December 1, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am
The name Hussein is common among muslims. There have been many great men and many bad men that have shared this name. It should not be viewed as dishonorable because of one man. Hussein is Obama’s name. He should wear it with pride.
Posted by: Beto | December 1, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am
The only reason Muslims are relatively quite in the US is because there aren’t enough off them to make a ruckus, not because they are assimilated so well. As number rise, so does radicalism. A review of European countries shows that clearly.In Europe, the higher Muslim populations cause the most trouble and those nations with fewer Muslims see much less radicalization.
As to BHO, I couldn’t care less what he does with his name. If he had any manhood, though, he’d use the whole name. it IS his name, after all. He’s already won the election. Why should he care what anyone thinks fo his name at this point?
Posted by: Warner Todd Huston | December 1, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am
It’s a name given to him, that doesn’t make him a terrorist, etc.
Don’t underestimate Obama – I think he is a very strong man and will be doing the best, he is picking some very smart and experienced people for his cabinet.
A name means nothing, it is the person who counts. It’s like people squawking because he is African-American (also half white), it is the person who counts. See the person – not the color or the name.
Posted by: smt | December 1, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
He can’t say his middle name – that would be RACIST! (or so we’ve been told this past year and a half)
Posted by: sarainitaly | December 1, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
It is entirely up to him, but I think he should use his full name when sworn in as the new President of the United States. His name should not be a cause for concern or equated with terrorism. Even if he was a Muslim, what would be wrong with that? Islam is not evil or bad, terrorism is and people of all religions have been involved in terrorism. Catholics and Protestants in Ireland have indiscriminately bombed and killed people also in pursuit of their political goals but no one would say that someone named Murphy or Sean or O’Connor is a terrorist just because they have an Irish name. It is no different with Mr. Obama. A name is just a name and those who would attach any evil intent to someone just because of their name is ignorant. President-elect Obama should use his whole name proudly.
Posted by: Brian, Decatur, GA | December 1, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
Actually, to me, it won’t make any difference. Like most politicians, he won’t be upholding that oath anyway.
Posted by: gemalo | December 1, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
I did not vote for Barack Obama- in fact, I ardently opposed his election but it had nothing to do with his race , his religion, or his name; I was doubtful that his stated policies would help to fix the ills of our great nation. I have never attacked him on a personal level, nor shall I.
Having said that, he has the right to be sworn in to office by whatever combination of his legal name that he chooses and as the 44th President of this nation, he deserves- and commands- the respect of ALL Americans, as well as all freedom-loving people of the world.
I may not have voted for him, but he will have my prayers and support every day that he is in office- no matter what name he goes by!
Posted by: Bob | December 1, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am
I’ll place a bet. He won’t use it. He doesn’t want anyone to remember it.
Posted by: cloey | December 1, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
“and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”
They all take that oath. All of them. Think about it.
Posted by: dragon | December 1, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
I think he should use it. After all, it equates to 54M Americans one of the reasons we did not vote for this Hussein in an American suit anyway. We need to keep the questions in the public eye. Question every move as to the underlying motive and not give in to his deception. Impeach Hussein before it is toooo late.
Posted by: notchanged | December 1, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am
I hate to tell Obama that the secret is out. We all know your middle name is Hussein. We won’t forget what it is. That should have nothing to do with whether you use it or not. If you like hyping the talk about racism in general then don’t use it, but don’t think that Americans will forget that it is your name just because you don’t use it. That is stupidity at it’s worst.
Posted by: Conserve | December 1, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
This Man is a contridiction in all aspects, even himself.
What he beleives in, his polices, issuses and even his name.
*sigh*
Posted by: seah | December 1, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
“Hussein” isn’t a Muslim name but it is actually Arabic. Muslim is a religion but Arabic is a location.
Jake, you need to be EDUCATED.
Posted by: Kara | December 1, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Barack Hussein Obama did not have any choice in the name he was given.
it was just that given to him.
and he probally did not have any problems with it until he ran up against a bunch of bigots.
he should use all three of the names he was given.
i think he will use all three of his names.
and is it a big deal if he does not?
The name that is called out during the ceremony has nothing to do with how well the job will be served.
i mean think about it?
I, George W. Bush-and look what we got.
so, yes he should say Barack Hussein Obama and live up to those names and serve this country for the good of all the people.
Posted by: sugar | December 1, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Reagan didn’t say his full name when he was sworn at president. Also Jimmy Carter didn’t either.
I think Obama will just say “Barack Obama” just as Reagan said “Ronald Reagan” and Carter said “Jimmy Carter”.
Posted by: Cameron | December 1, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
US Muslims assimilate?? You haven’t been to Michigan lately
Posted by: JamesJ | December 1, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
What difference does it make if he says his full name or not?
Posted by: what? | December 1, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Why people can’t mind their own busines? Using his father’s name is up to him to decide. I think he should be left alone.
Even former President Bill Clinton did not used his father’s last name. His father’s full name is William Jefferson Blythe III. Instead he chose to use Clinton name in high school.
Don’t judge people by their names.
There are many Chritains in the world today who use HUSSEIN name.
Huseein simply means : good
Posted by: I.A.T.SMITH | December 1, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
The election is over. He will solemnly swear using his full given name:
Barack Hussein Obama.
It will be a beautiful moment, fulfilling much of the American promise of equal opportunity for all.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | December 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
It makes no difference to me whether he includes his middle name or not, but it enraged me that people referred to his middle name during the campaign as though it were a disqualification.
Posted by: mary | December 1, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
I think he should use the name he was born with, and that can be found on his birth certificate…..
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | December 1, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
I didn’t vote for Obama, but I see nothing wrong with the middle name “Hussein.” He should make whatever choice he likes. I wish him success as President.
Posted by: Ed J | December 1, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Conserve
re: ‘but don’t think that Americans will forget that it is your name just because you don’t use it.’
duck & cover…, the ‘real Americans’ are back….. from ‘real America’…………
Back to reality Dept about the “Failure regime” currently in office… if you want something to complain about how about this:
‘The Bush administration backed off proposed crackdowns on no-money-down, interest-only mortgages years before the economy collapsed, buckling to pressure from some of the same banks that have now failed. It ignored remarkably prescient warnings that foretold the financial meltdown, according to an Associated Press review of regulatory documents.
Bowing to aggressive lobbying _ along with assurances from banks that the troubled mortgages were OK _ regulators delayed action for nearly one year. By the time new rules were released late in 2006, the toughest of the proposed provisions were gone and the meltdown was under way.
The administration’s blind eye to the impending crisis is emblematic of its governing philosophy, which trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the economy. Its belief ironically has ushered in the most massive government intervention since the 1930s.
Many of the banks that fought to undermine the proposals by some regulators are now either out of business or accepting billions in federal aid to recover from a mortgage crisis they insisted would never come. ‘
Posted by: Blue | December 1, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Deception comes in all forms, from all directions, including a mention of his middle name.
Posted by: fat cat | December 1, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
I doubt he wants to get people talking about his middle name as his first act as President.
I think he should continue to use the formulation he’s been using.
Posted by: Danny | December 1, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
I think he should use the name he was born with, and that can be found on his birth certificate…..
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | Dec 1, 2008 10:05:54 AM
————–
Only problem is if he has one, valid – a problem the Supreme Court has to decide.
Have you ever heard of that it remains to be checked by the Supreme Court that the candidate is “qualified” – not just his ability but his identity – after the election is over?
I suppose it’s another it’s America, everything is possible!
Posted by: toothless | December 1, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Blue,
Thank you for pointing out that the failure of the mortgage industry was 30 years in coming, starting with the Carter-era CRA (Community Reinvestment Act), being exacerbated by the Clinton-era executive policies which expanded the impact of the CRA and forced banks into more undesireable loans, and finally culminating in the failure of the Bush administration in enacting more regulatory oversight (uncharacteristic of Republicans) due to the ability of the Democrats to block any such action in the Senate (uncharacteristic of Democrats – wanting less regulation, that is, not blocking legislation), with the Senate’s unique “filibuster” rule which requires a 60% supermajority to break.
So yes, there were some bad policies involved here, but they started out on the Democrat side, and they were perpetuated by the Democrats, and the Republicans did not put up a loud enough complaint against what was happening.
But with the state of the MSM (heavily pro-Democrat, anti-Republican), would those complaints even have reached the public?
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | December 1, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Grey Matter, in this I agree totally. Never has mattered to me what religion a person follows, or any superficial identity characteristics they were born with. Never. My team member at work calls herself (and is in practice) a diversity teacher, at a university, yet I’ve never met anyone who is so quick to categorize people by their last names, religion, skin color, even how they dress! That is upsetting to me, yet it’s not acceptable for me to say “PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE!” Gets me in trouble every time. Diversity to her is maintaining separation into distinct groups and fighting against “assimilation.”
Muslims are not the bad guys, Chinese are not the bad guys, Palestinians are not the bad guys, no total group is made up entirely of bad guys. Well, maybe the Taliban and alQaida. Yeah, they’re bad.
His name is his name, though you have to admit he’s been through more than one. What’s with that?
Muslims should not feel ashamed of being Muslims.
And I still won’t support Obama. Not because of his name or race or religion…if he would announce two minutes after being sworn in that he’s Muslim, it wouldn’t increase or decrease my negativity. Granted, I would probably hit my head falling to the floor laughing, but it’s what’s inside him and his personal philosophy and tactics that turn me away.
So, Obama, you have our permission — say Barack Hussein Obama loud and proud!
Posted by: Laughing Cynic | December 1, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Will the Liberal Press denounce Chief Justice John Roberts as an evil Republican racist when he administers the oath in January and uses Hussein’s full name?
Posted by: Dude, Where's My Change? | December 1, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I say it was his given name at birth, and since none of us are able to select our names, we are stuck with the ones our parents decide upon and bequeath. Generally our names are selected due to someone in our family who was cherished. None of us know why Obama’s mom decided to give him his middle name, but it is his and he should be proud of it [if only because 'she' gave it to him]. So I say he should use it and my hope is that he will use it when being sworn in.
Furthermore what is there to be ashamed of in a name? No one can foretell what implication [due to others association] a name is considered [good or bad], but who cares since it was the chosen name. The only thing to do if you don’t like your name is have it legally changed and that can be a hassle in these security challenged times!
Posted by: Josephine | December 1, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Without question, he should say his full name. I was disappointed that it was left to Colin Powell to be the only one to stand up for Muslims during the campaign. The name Hussein, is just that, a name. It would send a positive message to Americans and the world if Obama proudly embraces his full name – it’s not something to be ashamed of and he’s in the prime position to make this clear.
Posted by: HK | December 1, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Mr. Obama should use his entire name, no matter if the connotation be positive, negative or neutral. In his own writings, he was struggling to come to grips of who he was – a black man, a white man, a Muslim, etc. Well, he has achieved the highest elected office in the world. He is who he has become and can no longer run from that. Don’t ask for an opinion poll, ask your advisers or run it past Shelly…as his VP elect Joe Biden says, ‘time to step up to the plate.’
Mike
Posted by: Michael | December 1, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I hope Obama does use his middle name during the ceremony. By doing so he will take a name associated with evil and turn it into a positive association. He will also send a powerful message about American acceptance of people from all walks of life out to the rest of the world.
BTW I didn’t vote for him but that was on the issues. As an individual and a representative of America I think he’s great.
Posted by: Mr 270 | December 1, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Nick in Virginia
I know, the whole world is lying, any press report that says something negative about Bush has to be slammed by you and ‘yer kind’, regardless of it’s accuracy…….Republicans and Conservatives have done a’ great’ job since 2000.
Does the Bush crime family and Republicans ever accept responsibility for anything without blaming someone who came before them?
Posted by: Blue | December 1, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
and while we’re at it:
re: “Looking back on his eight years in the White House, President George W. Bush pinpointed incorrect intelligence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction as “biggest regret of all the presidency.”
what a delusional fraud, they had decided to take out Iraq before 9•11
Posted by: Blue | December 1, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
As Colin Powell said, why shouldn’t a five year old Muslim American think that he can be President someday? He should use his full name. What better message could there be to the world that America’s changing.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | December 1, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Most important: he should use what he wishes to use. He’s certainly earned that right. ———— However, if *my* wishes were worth being consulted, I would encourage him to use his full name. It is his name, and his father’s name, one of the few things he has from his father. — It would, quite nicely, be a classy slap-back at all the radio personalities, etc., who snarled and spit that middle name at him as if it was something of which to be ashamed — It would reinforce Gen. Powell’s welcome statement that ‘it doesn’t matter’ in this country is one is Muslim or has a Muslim-sounding name, that it’s the content of the person’s character that matters, to quote another great leader — And, most important, a video clip of the new US President identifying himself by a name associated with a different region and different religion, while he is being sworn into office, would do more than anything I can imagine to tell people what America is all about *and* to shake the conviction of millions of people, some of them illiterate, many of them the people Jihadists will want to recruit, that all of the Western world hates them and anything to do with them. — Also, Hussein is an honorable and respectable name in the Arabic world (e.g., King Hussein of Jordan). There is no reason to hide or shy away from it (how would we feel if a multi-racial leader of a Middle East country tried to hide from a middle name like George? or William?). There is every reason, I think, for him to embrace it, and for us to embrace it, as a very legitimate part of the person who we are proud to call our President.
Posted by: Elizabeth | December 1, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
It’s his name, what’s the shame in that?
Posted by: buzzie | December 1, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
It is the legal name of the person we elected. And there is no reason to hide it at this point.
But didn’t Carter go by Jimmy and not James Earl? There is a degree of personal preference to which we should defer.
Posted by: OneObservation | December 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
It is really disgusting to hear people who call themselves “real” Americans express their bigotry on this matter. Like the KKK, who often uses scripture to try to justify their evilness, these people are the first to cite the constitution and the last to uphold it. Obama should use whatever he is comfortable with.
Posted by: KTMaryland | December 2, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
He will never have to worry about what name to use. The electoral college will not be voting for him as he is ineligible to be president. Second runner up after he is sticken from vote, John McCain. The question is what is his McCain’s middle name and will he use it? THis question about Obama is irrelevent.
Posted by: Gabrielle | December 3, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am