Nov 13, 2008 9:07am

Could You Fill Out This Job Application?

"If you have ever sent an electronic communication, including but not limited to an e-mail, text message or instant message, that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-elect if it were made public, please describe."

So asks question 13 of the questionnaire for potential top-ranking Obama administration officials.

The mind reels.

The seven-page, 63-question intrusive and extensive list of queries, first obtained by the New York Times and confirmed as legitimate by the Obama Transition Team, offers a revealing glimpse into both the Obama team’s determination not to repeat the mistakes of its predecessors (Any nanny issues? Any discriminatory club memberships?) as well as the new era on which Obama will lead ("Please provide the URL address of any Web sites that feature you in either a personal or professional capacity, e.g. Facebook, My Space, etc.").

Applicants are asked if they or any immediate family members own a gun, if they have ever been charged with sexual harassment or malpractice, if they have ever had any alimony or child support issues, "any writs of garnishment," or any bankruptcy problems.

Ever been investigated, arrested for, charged with, convicted of violating any law, regulation or ordinance? How about your spouse? Your child? ("You may exclude traffic offenses for which the fine was less than $50.")

Have you, your spouse, or any member of your immediate family ever worked with a financial, banking, insurance or mortgage institution currently the subject of federal government intervention as part of the financial meltdown? "This question includes but is not limited to, the following: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Washington Mutual."

What about gifts? "Other than from relatives, or from close and longstanding personal friends on occasions such as birthdays or seasonal holidays, have you or your spouse ever received a gift exceeding $50.00 in value? Please identify the donor, the value of the gift, the date received and the circumstances in which the gift was received."

Net worth, tax returns, loans, trusts, real estate. The questionnaire attempts to leave no stone unturned.

Provide a copy of every book, article, column or publication you have authored, any speeches you have given, any testimony delivered, any resume you’ve issued.

"Please list all aliases or ‘handles’ you have used to communicate on the Internet."

"If you keep or have ever kept a diary that contains anything that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-Elect if it were made public, please describe."

Crikey!

- jpt

User Comments

I think this is a good thing,
trying to clean up washington,
and clean up the white house.
all the questions should be asked,
this is a historic presidency,
they should try to set an example and make it the very best it could be.
therefore, no slip ups with shady characters working anywhere near the white house.
surely there are still some good decent, clean living folks left out there.
I hope they find some one.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Do they mean in the last 10 minutes? How in the world can anyone be qualified for a job with this administration?

Posted by: Brian | November 13, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

i wonder if all of them could fill out that application and get a job working for them?

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

What is wrong Jake no Palin story this morning?

Posted by: Wow | November 13, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Obama wouldn’t be able to get a job in his own administration. All that pesky paperwork keeps getting lost. How would he prove anything?

Posted by: mak | November 13, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I’d like to see the Prez and VP elects answers to these questions!

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 13, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

this is actually a pretty good idea if it actually stops them from hiring the wrong person…unfortunately, it’s probably not foolproof, since obama and biden probably wouldn’t be able to pass such an extensive test on their own…

Posted by: Samantha | November 13, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

It’s not a bad idea. Even if they answer yes, the White House can determine if what they find out is an acceptable risk or not.
And if they get caught, the administration can honestly say they were lied to and the truth was not disclosed to them.
A little over the top its true…but when you look at all the crooks in the current admin, can you blame the in-coming one?

Posted by: Greg in MN | November 13, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Obama could not pass this test. And he could not get a TOP SECRET security clearance either.
That should make us feel secure.

Posted by: independentview | November 13, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I’m not quite sure which application the NYT is referring to-there is not one bit of truth to the NYT article I am reading. What is also striking about the NYT article-they offer not one piece of evidence to support their claims-just the text that when put into a paper bag and shaken vigorously formed the words and sentences of their article.
I really, really wish other outlets would at least investigate and verify the accuracy of content before publishing, instead of the ‘copy and paste’ method the media is growing comfortable with today.

Posted by: John Caldwell | November 13, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

What is the point of these questions. It’s certainly not to exclude people from being part of the next administration. Rahm Emmanuel was on the Board at Fannie when it was wrapped up in scandal, yet he’s Chief of Staff. Maybe they just want to know which things they need to cover-up.

Posted by: BigYellowDog23 | November 13, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

It’s too bad that many qualified applicants cannot work for the government in this partisan era because they might be “embarrassing”. Who here has not?

Posted by: Sanity Man | November 13, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

How the heck did Gaffe Machine Biden get picked for VP? He never was on the record for saying anything that could potentially embarrass the president-elect?!?
This is so bizarre …

Posted by: JDD | November 13, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

What is the deal with the gun question and why does it even matter? The gun question is a matter of personal rights and has no bearing on whether a person can serve or not. Seems like Obama hates guns…

Posted by: Greg Woods | November 13, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Obama hasn’t even took office yet and already he’s proving himself to be thinking two steps ahead of his predecessors. He knows the few wack jobs in the media are going to be looking for every and anything they can to try and tear his presidency down.
This is a great defensive measure on his behalf but what concerns me is how the media that built him up appears to now look for a story in everything he does. are we going to watch GMA one morning and see Diane or Robin report that Obama is in the bathroom using the toilet while reading the Washington Post?
Ok great, he made history based on his skin tone. Can we give him a chance to make history as our nation’s new leader?

Posted by: Pete | November 13, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I would like a low level job as a volunteer that would never take me to the white house or expose me to any vital information, I could say yes to one of the above, however I am fighting to not be labled as a ofender if you have made the restitution of that charge. America is keeping people down from past mistakes,keeping people from gainful employement. How can that continue if you want to raise the people.Also if you say that you want people to integrate back into society as a working person contributing to the country.

Posted by: mary derricotte | November 13, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

This questionnaire is routine. If you are seeking employment with a Federal Law Enforcement agency the questions are the same. Why the stupid article when you know that this man has to find people with good backgrounds to work in his administration. Weed out the bad and hire the good.

Posted by: Yolonda | November 13, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The question isn’t whether “I” could pass “his” job application, but if “he” could pass any of the secret security briefings “I’ve” had.

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

It seems rather extensive, but with the scoundrels in the current administrations and all the scandal that Clinton had, I can understand his wanting to vett everyone so carefully.
Sarah Palin is an example of not vetting your choices carefully and Obama wants to solve problems not deal with unexpected embarrassments.

Posted by: rg | November 13, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Glad to see Obama is checking out his staff better than hte media did to him. What a joke this guy is going to be as president. I’m ashamed of anyone who voted for this jerk!

Posted by: KPL | November 13, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

I like it- about time someone wanted to know who there are hiring… for such an important job as this is.

Posted by: Lisa A Martin | November 13, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Greg Woods…the question is asking if you/family own a gun. it’s not asking if you legally own a gun. maybe anyone who answers “yes” to gun ownership is then required to prove it was a legal transaction.

Posted by: relax | November 13, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Obama could not even get a security clearance to work in a government job and he wants applicants to fill out all these extremely personal questions. He is naive if he thinks applicants will answer all these questions truthfully. Previous e-mails and diarys are none of Obama’s business. I suppose he wants to invade Americans privacy. Will we have any rights left under an Obama administration?

Posted by: Sandy | November 13, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

And Obama would be getting trashed as backing up on a promise and lazy in filling out his administration and staff if his transition team didn’t have such a rigorous application process.
This is necessary in an age of lobbyists and special interests seeping into government. They’ll still get in, but at least the questionnaire looks good…
/

Posted by: matt | November 13, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

This information is standard background information requested by any governmental agency in order to obtain a governmental job, with or without Obama.

Posted by: robert | November 13, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

NOT A CHANCE, IF ALL WASHINGTON WAS TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ALL WOULD BE OUT, SAVE 1 OR EVEN TWO AT THE MOST.

Posted by: justforusa1776 | November 13, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

I thought he already had the Top Secret briefing?

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Hey, this is way overdue. . .with the criminal behavior of Congress and the current Executive. . .what else can we do ???? At least you have the information up front. . .and getting a so-called ‘regular’ job these days, requires more than in the past. . .so we need to just get use to it. . .because this IS the future !!!
Felons, etc. . .beware.

Posted by: BJ | November 13, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

If anyone answered no to question 13, it would be a red flag that that person is lying.

Posted by: kat | November 13, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Just because you think the test is too stringent doesn’t make it a bad idea.

Posted by: jayh | November 13, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

How can anyone answer anything other than “yes” regarding the question about transmitting emails that could be a possible source of embarrassment to the president? 1st of all, you’re asking people to remember every possible email they’ve sent/forwarded to a frind over the past 10-12 years…thats not realalistic. 2nd, who is to say what may or may not be a source of embarrassment to the president? isn’t that a very subjective standard?

Posted by: bigyellowdog23 | November 13, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

I LOVE IT! Finally! We’ve been watching for years and wondering how most of these jokers get hired or voted in office! Its about time someone asked questions BEFORE we all find out they have some deep dark secret like for example, a guy that is wasting tax-payers money because he is busy text-messaging teenage male pages.
We also have to know that if someone is employed for the government, their spouse is not a lobbyist for some horrible country or corporation, because to me, that will cloud his/her decisions, and the guy in cabinet might not be so willing to say “no” to certain things.
Its about time we had some transparency and accountability in government.
I agree with What?: shady characters shouldn’t be working near the Whitehouse – let’s clean this mess up!

Posted by: ChrisB | November 13, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

John Caldwell, I think the application on the website you linked to is a precursor to a more detailed background check that is made later if the Obama administration is interested in having you become part of their administration. The NY Times has a PDF file that is copy of all the questions.
My SIL filled out a general information application much like the one on the website you linked to but once it was the determined that a city agency was interested in employing her she was sent a much more detailed application requesting far more information than was on the original application.

Posted by: JDD | November 13, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

That application sounds appropriate for government work at the highest level.
Or would we prefer a new legion of Michael Browns. And Sarah Palins.

Posted by: Danny | November 13, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Is Obama loosing his mind? How about we start questioning him more about Ayers, Rev. Wright, Rezko and others that he hung out with for years???

Posted by: KC | November 13, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

the one thing i will say about the obama presidency so far, i can see
it is transparent.
i mean think about it,
people are on the internet discussing the application process of people who will be hired to work in washington and the white house.
the folks who elected bush-got him in the white house, and bush and co. closed ranks, closed down the comm.
and the american people were never asked anything, or told much, and what bush did tell, they lied most of the time.
well, right after 9/11 they asked us to go shopping. anything to keep us from looking at and questioning what they were doing.
if you asked any questions-contrary to what they were doing you were tagged unpatriotic. hence, shut-up.
it is good for everyone to be so involved again.
the cloak is being lifted off the peoples house, and once again we can become a part of our govt.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

“Any discriminatory club memberships?” such as belonging to a racist church ???

Posted by: Bob | November 13, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Obama can’t pass the test to be his own bodyguard. He’s a joke.

Posted by: Maxify55 | November 13, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

The biggest problem with a questionaire like this (and most job applications, when you get right down to it) as a screening tool, is that it selects against honesty. People who cover up potentially negative information have a greater chance of success than those who voluntarily disclose it.
It is demoralizing to come to the realization that were I comfortable with lying on a job application, I would have a much more comfortable lifestyle than what I currently enjoy.
My hope is that any finalists amongst these applications are thoroughly investigated, and any that are found untruthful immediately disqualified. An employee with a potentially embarassing situation that you know about is much less of a liability than one who appears to be squeaky clean, but who later turns out to be soliciting internet hookups with teenage transsexual alter boys in airport restrooms.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Yes, I can pass it. I think this questionnaire should be given at the time a person announces its intention to be a candidate. At this point, it does not matter or not if Obama passes it or not; too late.

Posted by: Definitely Common Sense | November 13, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

What am I missing? Why are people saying Obama could not get a security clearance? Is he not getting top secret briefings now as POTUS? You people are such babies. Give it up. He is YOUR and my President. Must be eating you up inside.

Posted by: Craig | November 13, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

KPL
and you are NOT ashamed of the people who voted for BUSH?

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Could Obama pass this same test that he requires of others? I would like to see all of the same information detailing past of Obama.
Would Obama pass the test?

Posted by: Goldenboy | November 13, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

For those who keep posting that Obama wouldn’t pass security clearance, did u get that info from Sean Hannity? The same Hannity who is a drop out whose only substantive knowlege happens to be repeating — Rev. Wright, ACORN, and Socialism — constantly; regardless of whether we have a financial crisis or any other major story.
Guys, take a deep breath, turn of Fox News, get a life and accept this fact — Barack Obama is your President– Salute Him.

Posted by: Bored | November 13, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

and you are NOT ashamed of the people who voted for BUSH?
Posted by: What? | Nov 13, 2008 10:16:11 AM ********************* Not at all but I’m sure you are ashamed of him. Are you further ashamed of a man who kills babies?
Yes or No. No further bantering. Just yes or no, please.

Posted by: Maxify55 | November 13, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Obama runs the risk of depriving Americans of one of their favorite pastimes….complaining about Washington.
It’s, sort of, an oxymoron. People want change, as long as it doesn’t change anything. ??!!?? Go figure!

Posted by: Akili | November 13, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Since Obama would not be cleared by his own test, I guess he is just trying to keep any more heat from piling on.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Obama could not even get a security clearance to work in a government job and he wants applicants to fill out all these extremely personal questions. He is naive if he thinks applicants will answer all these questions truthfully. Previous e-mails and diarys are none of Obama’s business. I suppose he wants to invade Americans privacy. Will we have any rights left under an Obama administration?
Posted by: Sandy | Nov 13, 2008 10:04:20 AM
****************************************Bush is currently seeking to make it easier for your state and local governments to “spy” on you with the means they have available, and yet I hear people writing this? I do believe the worst one in this area is currently occupying the WH.

Posted by: Susan-1 | November 13, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Sandy, Obama has a government job–it’s called U.S. senator. And if any of you think for a minute that the McCain/Palin campaign would have hesitated for a second to use any and all dirt they could find on Obama to discredit him during the election, you’re mistaken.
By the way, George W. is the one who has eroded privacy laws in this country, by allowing the NSA to conduct millions of wiretaps and keeping gov’t privacy posts unfilled (plus, he’s rolled back rules related to the privacy of medical data).

Posted by: kspur | November 13, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Whether they answer them truthfully or not, these questions need to be asked and answered in writing so that if it is ever discovered that an employee lied they can be fired on the spot. Obama’s team needs to be prepared to answer any questions and not be surprised or blind-sided when somebody is called out on past actions. The media is much better now at finding the goods on everyone because of technology. If there’s something that could be considered a story, they’ll put it out there, no matter how trivial it may actually have been in real life. Very normal stuff, it’s just changed with the times. It’s good for them to want to be prepared. We, as the general public, have to understand the intentions of some of the media out there. They’re very often only interested in creating a story that will ultimately benefit their own career. Have you ever laughed at an inappropriate joke? I hope it wasn’t in front of someone who has it in for you! Nobody’s perfect. The questions are relevant and need to be asked.

Posted by: Zfam | November 13, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Now that’s what you call vetting! I like it.

Posted by: cincyr | November 13, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

maxify55,
yes, I am ashamed of a man who further kills babies,
bush has killed how may iraq babies and counting?
babies in the womb and out.
no bantering yes.
i am ashamed of the man who further kills babies.
and you are correct there, those iraq women did not have a right to choose,
george bush in office as president
babies killed period.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

did he ask chief of staff if he ever threatened anyone by sending a dead fish(think mafia) did ask was it your job to oversee Fannie may and FERDIE mac ? he can watch billions of dollars wasted on those 2 and say fine job rommie

Posted by: al | November 13, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I didn’t see where it says a yes or no answer disqualifies anyone, it just asks for information.

Posted by: JR | November 13, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

What?…let me start out by saying the catholic church is not “mixed-up” on the choice/life issue anymore than you are.
The church, catholics, non-catholics christians, jews, hindus, muslims, atheists…all are entitled to take in the issue and then form an opinion.
There is nothing “mixed-up” about making an informed opinion. You don’t have to agree with it, you don’t have to listen to it, and you don’t have to be a catholic.
As for gun control, but don’t try and act like Obama’s isn’t anti-gun. He is on record as wanting to reintitute the ban on assault weapons.
Don’t forget, just as you obviously value your right to choose, a right protected as a privacy right encompassed by the 1st ammendment, there are those who value their 2nd ammendment right to arms.
How come its ok for you to value your constitutional rights but not ok for others to value a different constituitonal right?

Posted by: BigYellowDog23 | November 13, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

he left out blood type, DNA, spit sample, hair sample, imprint of teeth, hand, eye and brain scan for you & your immediate family members. Maybe that is submitted after you get the job.

Posted by: inl82008 | November 13, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I applied for a visa to Saudi Arabia during the oil embargo of 1973. The application form asked questions like “Name every organization you have ever belonged to” and “Give every address you have ever lived at.” So far so good. But Obama’s questions like “What e-mails have you ever sent that might embarass the government” requires that I sit in judgement on myself, which is uncool.

Posted by: Andy Canfield | November 13, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Posted by: What? | Nov 13, 2008 10:22:01 AM *************** Oh, please. I persoanlly know an Ohio congressman who desperately needs your evidence. Bring it to Washington immediately. I’ll hold Dubya down for you. Until then all you have is insane banter. Put up or shut up.

Posted by: Maxify55 | November 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“It’s, sort of, an oxymoron. People want change, as long as it doesn’t change anything. ??!!?? Go figure!”
It’s not that people don’t want change but we also are realistic.
I’m not sure how old you are but most of us have a track record by the time we are 30 of having made some bone-headed moves and saying incredibly stupid things. Heck, these days there a probably video tapes of most of us drunk but we were too plastered to realize and/or care that we were being caught on camera. Is that not potentially embarressing to the president-elect?
I think another poster hit it on the head. I think they want to know these things so they can scrub the record clean so to speak. Erase proof as much as they can and spin the rest.

Posted by: JDD | November 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

what’s to prevent an applicant from lying or omitting info? most of those questions would be difficult to prove regardless of the answer. sounds more like butt-covering than transparency.

Posted by: jarhead85-95 | November 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

By the way, Susan 1′s comments are hilarious because she has no idea what she’s talking about!!
Obama didn’t have to be vetted to run for president? How silly you are. By the way, he already has a government job. We’ve already heard all the dirt on him, and have you noticed that the GOP has completely dropped all their silly rhetoric about him? I guess he was only a threat before the election, right?
Bush has eroded the privacy of this country, not the dems!!! You’re a democrat, and you don’t even know it!

Posted by: Zfam | November 13, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

bigyellowdog,
you can have your rights, just don’t point them at me.
as far as the babies go,
(and this is for you to maxify55)
let women do whatever they want to do with their bodies,
bush and his war have killed million of babies. no choice there.
so keep your guns-to yourselves.
and let women keep their bodies to themselves.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Where does it say that a yes or no answer disqualifies anyone?

Posted by: JR | November 13, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I don’t blame him. I wouldn’t want anyone’s shady past to ruin my term in the white house… He’s playing it smart and I think it’s FANTASTIC!!

Posted by: Belliehead | November 13, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

It is butt-covering. But if they didn’t ask these questions, then we would be shocked that they didn’t ask these questions. There is no story, here.
This is what I mean about using common sense when reading “news” stories. This article is getting people talking and heated over a non-issue.

Posted by: Zfam | November 13, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama couldnt pass his own test with all his criminal and terrorist associations. What a joke !!!!!

Posted by: jimbo | November 13, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

When four independent security experts, including a former Army Intellegence officer, were asked if Barack Obama could pass the security clearance to become an FBI or Secret Service agent, they unanimously concluded that he could (the intelligence officer made it very clear that he didn’t like the conclusion, but it was his honest appraisal).
If you are compelled to lie, could you at least come up with some new and interesting lies? The old ones don’t get any better with repetition.
How about… hmmmm… Obama is the secret love child of Idi Amin and Madonna!

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Jake
What would happen if he was NOT this thorough and the media discovered one of these things AFTER Senate confirmation? Would not you all be saying how he should have been more thorough?

Posted by: jock59801 | November 13, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The amazing thing is that Obama couldn’t even pass the same background check his secret servicemen pass because of his associates. The man is a hypocrite of the highest caliber.

Posted by: Jo | November 13, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Tell me why Obama couldn’t pass this questionnaire? And what makes you think he couldn’t get a top secret clearance? EXPLAIN yourself.

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | November 13, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Maybe this will give us a sense of pause…..before we click “send”….

Posted by: shalom | November 13, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

maxi,
what evidence do you need from me,
are you saying bushes war has NOT
killed babies (I believe that is what you started out talking about-ashamed of a man who further kills babies)
of course, babies have died in the womb and out in iraq, the congresswoman does not need my help for that.
i suggest you watch the pbs indi lens
lionesses
babies are being killed in and out of the womb.
maxi,
and once again-i am further ashamed of a man who kills babies.
this was bushes war, babies have died.
why are you not ashamed?
or do iraq babies not count in your world?

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Suddenly the Air is filled with the sounds of raddeling bones across the nation,of lost inclination,the regrets of a nation.

Posted by: Richard | November 13, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

For those who are gripping about the invasive application… GET OVER IT! If someone wants a position in a cabinet representing the highest office in the land, then yes, their background should be under the microscope. After all, this is not a position at Burger King!
The application is a needed precautionary measure. If someone is foolish enough to lie on the application… Need I say more?

Posted by: Desiree | November 13, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I would LOVE to see NObama’s answers to these very same questions. He probably would not be eligible for his own job!
Considering that he’s pulling a lot of people from the old Clinton administration, it will be interesting to see how many pass the “test.” Monica and cigars are not a very distant memory to many of us.

Posted by: MyFellowAmericans | November 13, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Jo
There is absolutely no evidence that Obama could not pass any background check. In fact, he has already passed the most important check of all: the American people elected him to be our President.

Posted by: jock59801 | November 13, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I wouldn’t have hired Obama for any position in my firm:
1) No certified proof of citzenship
2) Will not release college transcripts
3) 20 years unaccounted for
4) Associations with known terrorists
This guy would never have passed the background check…
NMP – Never my President..

Posted by: Innisfree | November 13, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

jo:
Bill Gates did not complete Harvard University……yet he’s one of the richest men alive….
Do you think Bill Gates can exceptionally perform any job at MicroSoft on day one?
Your point about Obama is nonsensical…
He’s the president elect…….He’s not self-employed, he was hired by the majority of the voting public….

Posted by: shalom | November 13, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

“Maybe this will give us a sense of pause…..before we click “send”….”
Probably not. We have moderators to save us from ourselves, though I’m coming to believe that the ones employed by ABCNews.com have had their sense of humor surgically removed.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

To bad they didn’t put Obama under the microscope. He was never vetted.
Just glad us republicans are here to point all this out, day after day for everything he does. Its our turn now.

Posted by: HH | November 13, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

What?,
Do you realize you started out saying its ok to “have opinions, but just don’t point them at me” and then pointed your opinion on choice/life directly at me? It’s hypocritical.
If you’re going to be a VOCAL advocate for choice, you can’t then turn around and expect the advocates of life to stay quiet.
As for the war in iraq, i don’t know where that came from because we were talking about guns and choice, but i don’t think it belongs in an argument over abortion.
Thats not to say a debate over the loss of innocent life in iraq isn’t worthy of debate, but it’s a debate that stands on its own and really has nothing to do with abortion.

Posted by: bigyellowdog23 | November 13, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

There are two good reasons for this questionnaire. The first is to try and find out about potential problem areas of a perspective employee and second, to make that person accountable for their past so that if something DOES come to light later, that person is to blame for covering up the facts, not the government or Obama.

Posted by: agi Fodor | November 13, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

innisfree,
obama, wanted me to tell you that he is sorry, he will not be applying for a job at your firm after all.
obama has a job for the next eight years already.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

GEEZ stop already it is none of our business how his team comes into being. He is the boss on this job site and if he wants to know everything about you he can ask, It just seems odd that all the admins. aren’t run like this if they were you wouldn’t have the other party cleefully run to the media once a week with new tales to get your attention off the real issues the President needs to pay attention to.Not run down a story on one of your cabinet memebers sex life or what e-mail you sent your mother-in-law last summer talking about some stupid thing that makes headlines. Let us get real we will have another eight years of what they did to Clintons if he doesn’t try to get to all this ahead of time. The right is even as I type this getting ready to start the never ending deluge of rat faced digging into everything Obama. And don’t try to tell me that isn’t true. That is what they do to liberals.

Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | November 13, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Wow! There sure are a lot of ding-dongs out there with too much time on their hands.
Maybe you should turn attention away from petty bickering and toward actually doing something constructive to further what you believe in?

Posted by: schnagler | November 13, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Obama people want you to pass a background check! What a joke. The only way this man could get a security clearance is to be elected to the Senate and now President. As a Air Force veteran I know Obama could not get a secret clearance let alone Top Secret or higher if he would of tried to get in the military years ago.
With his admited drug use and ties to Bill Aires. He would not even have been able to pass the background check to be a PA State Trooper.

Posted by: Jose | November 13, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

No one knows the real Barrack but we soon will, I’m just glad and proud I didn’t vote for him, I’m not easily conned.

Posted by: davectrep | November 13, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Talk abut applications. The Republican Party needed a better criteria for Sarah Palin when they hired her!
Obama is a Harvard Graduate the top of his class and president of his Law Class. His community work before becoming senator was inspiring and selfless dedication. He filed an application and 64 million people, in America, voted for him. Your problem is that you didn’t. Get behind him instead of knifing him because he doesn’t pass the skin test of white America. A Republican white Obama Supporter

Posted by: Caroline | November 13, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

bigyellowdog,
the comments about the abortion,was a conversation i was having with maxify55 who made comment to me on earlier comment of mine.
if you will go back and read my comments, and the people who responded to them you will be able to follow what i was saying.
and for the record, i did not bring up the issue of abortion or gun rights first. i was only replying.
i will not go into it further, read the earlier comment.
and once again, i said, you can have your guns, just dont’ point and shoot at me and mine.
and on the abortion thing,(maxify55, was trying to call obama a baby killer,
but did not make the connection that bush is a baby killer also, iraq babies have died in bushes war in and out of the womb.
that was my point to maxify55
bigyellowdog-you have your guns-good for you.
i hope all you use them for us catcing food.
before paulson,bennie, and bush get finished with “doing a good job”
we may all need to go rabbit hunting.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

It is impossible to hire completely clean but the administration will at least have the opportunity to conduct proper risk management and prepare for potential PR.
One has to weigh all options, there are very few black and white topics/issues

Posted by: JB | November 13, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Jose nailed it. Obama couldn’t possibly get past a Top Secret background check. Too many associations with weirdos, and a history of drug abuse. Lots of luck to his staff, who will have to lie to get hired.

Posted by: Glen | November 13, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Hello…. Obama is going to be PRESIDENT! He obviously has passed a few tests. Do you realize that being the president IS a government job?
I feel sorry for everyone who believed the garbage the GOP desperately tried to feed the public in an effort to win an election. Now what are you going to do with all the fear they created in you? You notice that they’ve left you all to stew in your misery. THEY’RE obviously not as afraid of Obama as they wanted you to believe they were. Do you beleive that the GOP has more information on Obama that they’re just not sharing with the public? No. And if the media had any more interesting information, trust me, they would have it out there. It would be the biggest story of their lives. Open your eyes, people. Obama is not going to turn us over to terrorists and run away with our tax dollars. Have you noticed how many republicans have lined up behind Obama, ready to move on to the next four years? It’s politics, people. It’s very irresponsible for politicians to play on people’s deep seeded fears, just to get votes. There are no innocent parties in that practice. However, this election was a campaign of fear vs. a campaign of hope. It was good to see that fear lost.
What we really need is a viable third party. Unfortunately, I (and everybody I know) have lived a good life, leaving me somewhat unsuitable for politics. I wouldn’t pass that test either. I have done some pretty embarassing things, many of them alcohol related! Haha! Good times! Anyway….
By the way, do you think Bush could pass the test? Now that’s a guy I’d like to have a beer with! I bet he’s a hoot!

Posted by: Zfam | November 13, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Some of you Obama people don’t realize that the President is only elected for a four year term. You will have to vote again in four years if you want to retain him.

Posted by: setting record straight | November 13, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

LOL….some of the posters are right on the money!!!!
Obama & Bideon Both would have issues getting an acceptable grade on this paper!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Imagine having the foresight to trap your employees into a trip under the bus whenever you (the employer) decide its time. Penelope Perfect would have a hard time filling out this app.
Imagine also how you would be treated by the EEOC if you ran a small business and asked some of these questions.

Posted by: smith | November 13, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I like you, “What?”

Posted by: Zfam | November 13, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

“Get behind him instead of knifing him because he doesn’t pass the skin test of white America.”
Personally, I am sick of the idea that any criticism of this guy has to be treated as racism.
I disagree with his politics; I don’t care what his ethnic background is!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Other than the fact that QUESTIONNAIRE is spelled wrong on the MSNBC headline–we all good–what professionals they have! NOT

Posted by: jan | November 13, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

i like you to Zfam,
but i don’t want to have a beer with that recovering drunk-
two beer for him and-yuk

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

President-elect Obama is being very cautious and I don’t blame him. Even a hint of impropriety sends the media sharks into a feeding frenzy and gives political opponents the opportunity to castrate you. Anyone who hasn’t made a mistake…hasn’t been alive very long. This application just puts everyone under consideration…on record. It doesn’t mean someone is automatically disqualified if they’ve committed an infraction in the past. It just depends on the gravity of their offense. It is also an insurance policy so that if a person omitted something from their application, the Obama administration can truthfully say they didn’t know. If someone’s current or past ties present a conflict of interest, it’s only wise to be aware of that so as to avoid putting this person in a position that would compromise their ethical credibility. This application process is a very good start for President-elect Obama.

Posted by: Gabriel | November 13, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

isn’t it to late for this? the man is in. this point or this should have surface alonnggggg time ago. why now?

Posted by: maria | November 13, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

“If you keep or have ever kept a diary that contains anything that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-Elect if it were made public, please describe.”
———————————–
Dear Diary,
Today was a indeed a good day, my good friend Bill Ayers held a nice fund raiser for me in his home. I saw soem old familar faces and a lot of new ones. I think we might be able to get this thing off the ground now. I am looking forward to many more good entries in the near future.
Barrack
Can’t imagine where the idea came from about diaries creating a problem……

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

“Applicants are asked if they or any immediate family members own a gun, if they have ever been charged with sexual harassment,…..” They somehow put exercising a constitutional right in the same category as sexual harassment! Do they relate going to church to grand theft auto? Is requesting a lawyer the same as murder? I suppose asking for trial by jury is equal to tax evasion. I’m just trying to get it straight which Constitutional right is equal to what crime. … I couldn’t pass Obama’s test. I’ve never been a terrorist, never cursed America, never been convicted of a crime other than traffic tickets, never been part of a banking scandal and shame of shames, I own a gun. Heck I even go to church, speak my mind and exercise a few other constitutional rights.

Posted by: Oonogil | November 13, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

In this new age of 24 hour news, media saturation and vicious political attacks it’s the way to go. He doesn’t want any surprises that could derail his important agenda. Smart, thorough, competent. What a great change!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | November 13, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

This is the most organized group I’ve ever seen! Nothing like covering your butt in case someone turns out to be a total embarrassment to the admin! At least they can say they vetted everyone. I just hope they go over those apps with a fine-tooth comb! Just’cause they filled it out…doesn’t make it so.

Posted by: Chris | November 13, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Obama couldn’t pass Obama’s own test…

Posted by: Jake | November 13, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Wake up people!!! This is what “vetting” is, and the McCain camp could learn something from it!!! (Albeit… too little, too late!)
If you feel that this is an ivasion of privacy, then please explain to me how YOU would go about choosing the people who could potentially have knowledge of this nations most highly secretive and sensitive information!!!
These people are not interviewing for a cashier job at Wal-Mart!!!

Posted by: shawn | November 13, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Maybe if he was vetted as such, we would not be in this mess. I would like to see what his background looked like, because I know for a fact to get my TSC/CI, there is no way I would have gotten it with the same background as he had. now way now how.

Posted by: Kim | November 13, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Does the statement of “following our Greatest Smartest Leader to the world in which there is no poverty, no crime, no homeless, from each according to his ability to each according to his need” count as a potential problem?
If so, this homeless is disqualified.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 13, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Wow, that means if Obama fills this application out he doesn’t qualify.haha. The funny thing is that everyone Obama knows including his wife won’t qualify either. Who is he going to hire? Looks like he’s calling his own kettle black. What does it matter anyway, his administration is going to be a joke and we all know that everyone he associates with are crooks. What? The “help” is going to fill this out? Well, good luck because most people in that industry associates or is related to someone who falls under these no no’s. This is too funny!

Posted by: Texas | November 13, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Zfam,
You are dead wrong and have NO IDEA what you are talking about.
A past that includes the use of drugs DOES NOT keep you from getting a clearance. Also, there is nothing that that states befriending “weirdos” would be an issue either.
You have NO idea what you are talking about. When getting a clearance the goal is to be honest. If you are dishonest then you have a problem. What they are trying to see is if you have any information that can be used as black mail against you.
Bush admitted using drugs, Obama admitted using drugs so these things become non-issues and can not be used as blackmail.
JJ

Posted by: John | November 13, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Applicants are asked if they or any immediate family members own a gun, if they have ever been charged with sexual harassment or malpractice, if they have ever had any alimony or child support issues, …
————
How about “do you have any Aunts who are illegal aliens described in any of your papers, books, essays, stories, electronic postings, Jake’s blogs”?
Our Greatest Leader is resigning by his own standard.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 13, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

and TEXAS,
what about that old dude you all gave us.
dubya-i would put in some haha too.
but i am to mad at him and his supporter.
and he is to sad.
dubya-the president-what a mess.

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

also,
texas,
after giving us dubya-we all know
dubya and qualifications cannot be used in the same sentence

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Wow guess that application could not be passed by a lot in our Senate or Congress, or most of. Hell the Clintons wouldn’t even pass. Guess that counts HIllary out.

Posted by: amy | November 13, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Some of you Obama people don’t realize that the President is only elected for a four year term. You will have to vote again in four years if you want to retain him.
Posted by: setting record straight | Nov 13, 2008 10:53:18 AM
———
Maybe, he turns out to be the Greatest Dearest indeed. Then, I’d be happy to vote for him. So, keep your record.
So far, he is still making boneheaded mistakes in everything coming out of his camp.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 13, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

If you imbeciles are paying attention, Obama is hiring a lot of people right out of the old Clinton administration. If you think for one second that the folks from the Clinton administration are clean, think again. Now, what was that about associations? It’s very funny that Obama couldn’t pass muster on his own “effing” questionnaire. Drugs and questionable associations. Hmmm, isn’t that like the pot calling the kettle “black”. Oh gee, sorry that was racist.

Posted by: Walt | November 13, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Considering the wages those “public servants” receive, isn’t it normal that they are vetted to make sure they do have the interest of the public at heart?
Considering that they have our lives in their hands, isn’t it normal that they should disclose a lot more that the average citizen in the job application?
Considering that they’ll have access to all those very same informations about us -whether we allow it or not- (the current warrant-less taping of international AND domestic calls), isn’t it normal that the administration makes sure they don’t have embarrassing skeletons in their closets?
Of course it would an invasion of privacy, if it were not motivated by those exigencies, but, no one forces them to apply for, or accept appointment to, those very sensitive jobs.

Posted by: miumiu48 | November 13, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Obama-bots…..
This is nothing new at all, every administration has done this. Do you people think that everyone in his administration is actually going to tell the full and complete truth to every one of those questions?
Before his 4 years are up, I guarantee he will have his hare of embarassments from staff just as every other president has!
Who ever leaked this thing was a moron because it gives us all the ability to sit here and laugh, knowing that HE would be refused entrance into his own administration!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Walt,
You are correct, and a great many of those people from those years NEVER did obtain clearances! This should be interesting!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

What I wonder is how in the heck That One will get security clearance given his ties to Ayers, Alinsky, and the corrupt officials in Kenya? Goood heavens, it’s frightening to think that we are so lax in giving this thug clearance.

Posted by: theforse | November 13, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Considering Rahm is up to his elbows in FAnnie/Freddie Fraud, perhaps his own chief of staff should have filled this out before Barack signed him up.

Posted by: Anti-Harkonnen Freedom Fighter | November 13, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Ask him if he is LIAR? His answer had better be YES because he is hands down.
Posted by: Carol | Nov 13, 2008 11:22:36 AM
————–
Carol,
You see, he cannot answer a Yes, because that means he would have been telling the truth, then, he would have not been a liar.
So, he needs to lie to the end, and the answer must be a No. Then, he is lying he is not a liar, which proves he is a liar.

Posted by: Americans 1 | November 13, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

accountability.

Posted by: Ed | November 13, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Funny. I wonder if Obama has filled out one of these…

Posted by: Heh | November 13, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

What makes you think, Wait, that it isn’t exactly because many of them are from the Clinton team, that this vetting is being done?
As a matter of fact, I tend to think that anybody who’s held a position with either the Congress, the Pentagon, the CIA/FBI, or the White House since the Nixon years, should be vetted in that manner before being hired for a position in the coming administration.

Posted by: miumiu48 | November 13, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Barry Obama couldn’t pass a background check to be his own bodyguard….
associations with terrorists-check
assoications with pro-palestinians-check

Posted by: USPatriot | November 13, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Did Obama or Michelle ever release their college papers written by them?

Posted by: John | November 13, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Here, here…let’s see if Obama can pass his own screening process before he takes office.

Posted by: Cheryl | November 13, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I say answer yes to all and you are a shoe in to be hired.
New headline should read “All Criminals and Liars Get Priority Status in Hiring for the Obama Administration.

Posted by: ctay | November 13, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I agree with some of you. Why has the media left Obama alone about his credentials. He has yet to disclose his school information and his birth certificate. Doesn’t that bother anyone? Could deception be the basis of this new administration to be?

Posted by: Elaine Anderson | November 13, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

He’s vetting more carefully than he himself was vetted.
I can’t wait to say I TOLD YOU SO, to all those Obamaphiles, when they start losing their religion….

Posted by: Maura O | November 13, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

All the sore losers are out in force trying to make something out of nothing. The “know nothings” of the modern era are just that: KNOW NOTHINGS

Posted by: Herb Gray | November 13, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Smoke and mirrors. This questionnaire could be just as useful for cover up as it is for weeding out.
His own campaign team and transition team can’t fill that out without incriminating themselves. Actually neither can Barack Obama, Bill Clinton or Barney Frank.
Wanna get hold of that Ayers-Khalidi-Obama tape the LAT is holding there Jake?

Posted by: saint | November 13, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

It is amazing that those standads were not imposed on the “President Elect” himself.Like the old saying “do as I say not as I do”.blahhhhh…

Posted by: Frank | November 13, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

So you’re all complaining that he’s thoroughly vetting potential administration officials? Sounds like a good thing to me, but then, I’m not blinded by hatred of him. I guess a few other Americans see it the way I do, or he wouldn’t have won so convincingly.

Posted by: obamamama | November 13, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

“All the sore losers are out in force trying to make something out of nothing. The “know nothings” of the modern era are just that: KNOW NOTHINGS
Posted by: Herb Gray”
——————————–
LOL…so you think my little friend.
Some of us know a great deal about this subject! Let us just say that if he were not Senator or Pres-Elect, he would need considerable help to obtain a clearance!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

As a retired federal worker, I can understand the need for such a questionaire and did fill out a new one every time I went to work for a new agency or was promoted or my work changed.
My suggestion would be for the applicant to fill the initial one out as completely and as fully as possible. Then the document could be filed with OPM. When there is a circumstance in employment and a new one needs to be done, just download the original one and change it for any needed changes. In some cases, no changes at all need to be done.

Posted by: Beto | November 13, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Now that is real change. Gee, just how many Republicans fit any of these. Oh yeah, there was the arrest with the bathroom incident, remember? Then there was a head of the Homeland Security who was making arrangement for a meeting with a police officer pretending to be a 12 year old when he was arrested, remember? Then there was the incident with the PAGES, remember? Funny how Republicans always make their crimes seem unimportant and more isolated when instead they are caught as PEDIFILES and sexual PREDITORS and it is just the tip of the iceberg. And when the Republicans were arrested, the police did not know WHO they were arresting.

Posted by: mere | November 13, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Why is it that all the sore losers do not give the FBI credit for knowing how to vet Obama for a security clearance. You can bet your sweet booty, they do not take seriously the comments by most of the posters on this thread.

Posted by: msgijoe | November 13, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

It is going to be extremely difficult to “get behind” a president who could not possibly pass the same security background checks that are required of me as a mere civilian contractor to the Federal Government. We keep lowering the bar and expecting improved results. It doesn’t work that way.

Posted by: Kevin | November 13, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Barry Obama wouldn’t even qualify to be a police officer pretty much anywhere in the u.s. With his admitted use of cocaine. He’d also have to disclose all school records and take a polygraph. I think something is wrong when the leader of the free world couldn’t even qualify to be his own security detail.

Posted by: dave | November 13, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

mere,
I have stated here many times that EVERY administration has had its share of ethics issues with its staff members.
I don’t care whose little form asks what questions, Obama will have has his shre too! Only a totally ignorant fool would think otherwise.

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Kevin……
BINGO!!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

If only McSame had vetted Moose Barbie as thoroughly. Once again Mr. Obama shows how it’s done right. Looking forward to an intelligent and thoughtful 8 years.

Posted by: YOMAMA | November 13, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

I salute you Barack. This shows that you are a man of your words. Your desire is to run this country with excellence, honor and distinction. You would like to see this economy recover and provide jobs and security for our people. If McCain had been elected, we would have seen the total collapse of our great nation. In the same way that he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, he would have picked people like Joe the Plumber from the street (with no clue whatsoever about the economy), to manage the US economy.

Posted by: Kensing James | November 13, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

First of all, if you have ever been in the military services you would know that Obama would not qualify for even a “confidential” clearance because of his past associations. That’s all water over the dam now. But it is food for thought. I don’t know of one politican or business bigwig that could be called little Mr. Goody-two-shoes. Having them fill out a work application is next to comical. This is the kind of stuff that scares me. He needs to level with the American people not find the best smoke and mirrors act. He got what he wanted, now do something. The country is falling apart all around you! Congress still thinks its quibble and b__tch time! If you really are a uniter you better get started pronto or there won’t be anything left to unite.

Posted by: James F | November 13, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Can applicants just write in “my kids went to school with his kids”, or “this is a distraction”?
What would happen to a job applicant that had a gift of say…someone buying a large strip of land next to the house you want to buy because you can’t afford both lots? What if that someone is under Federal investigation?
I wonder if that would pass muster in the Obama administration.
We certainly don’t have all this information about *him*.

Posted by: MayBee | November 13, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I voted for Obama and I am already sick of him, Can we forget all this and move on hopeing that he proves us wrong on what our gut feelings are telling us

Posted by: Sadiegirl | November 13, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

dave.. you can be a police officer with past cocaine use. If you disclose the information on your application it shows you are honest. Everyone regrets things they have done when they were young it is part of life and a growing experience. Obama may not fit your standards but he fit somebodies standards because he is President-elect so get over yourself and you find a way to make this world a better place.

Posted by: missy | November 13, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

I Have a past not afraid to tell it and I will see where it lands me. I’m college educated and have a Masters in IT Security I won’t to strt at the bottom and work my way up. i have no problem in trying. This is not about Obama passing security this is about applicants, who wnat a job at different levels in this administration. Now if you where asked by e-mail to apply. Apply and get started in the process, you never know it might take you. Stop complaining and get busy. This is a new day. I have never seen an opening offered to average person– ever. Not in the white house I’m thrilled to death.

Posted by: mary derricotte | November 13, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

no,
the bar is being raised.
and of course, the corrupted are going to kick against this.
it is about time we got the civil back in civil servants.
you know part of the reason the british are working out their financial crisis.
because they already have good, know their stuff long term civil servants working.
you know what bush did, came into office
fired all of the good, know their stuff long term civil servants, and hired
friends, lackeys, and no nothings.
and this country is paying for it.
Salute obama, i hope you all will keep up the good goverment work you have begun.
and don’t do as bill did, keep your zipper zipped.
and your back watched.
because the rep. powers are coming for you

Posted by: What? | November 13, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Based on the mix of comments on this message board, I guess for those who like Obama will always like Obama and those who hate Obama will always hate Obama. How sad.

Posted by: Paula | November 13, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Wow, after drinking the McCain koolaid for so long, I guess those Obama-wins-in-an-electoral landslide grapes taste pretty sour. If all of you disgruntled McCain supporters actually believe in his motto, “Country First,” then you’ll stop with the snarky sniping and do something to help the President-elect improve the country. Or do you really believe in Country Club First? By the way, because Obama’s mother was a natural-born US citizen (from Kansas) it doesn’t matter where Obama was born–he is a US citizen–period.

Posted by: Harry Tichbaum | November 13, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I raise my right hand.
I shout out: Obama Rules.
I move forward in the Obama
army to rule the world.
I pledge allegiance to Obama,
ruler of the United States of America,
and to his supporters for whom he stands,
one nation under Obama,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for HIS friends.

Posted by: toneyal | November 13, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

“If only McSame had vetted Moose Barbie as thoroughly. Once again Mr. Obama shows how it’s done right. Looking forward to an intelligent and thoughtful 8 years.
Posted by: YOMAMA”
——————————–
LOL….yeah right!!!
It getting off to a wonderful start isn’t it.
Pelosi & Reid running behind his back to kiss the @ss of the auto industry.
He wants to create yet another useless Dept for wasteful government spending.
(Dept of Urban Policy, aka Home of ACORN)
The stock market has not magically healed since he won, in fact it continues to fall further down the hill.
If he were any kind of a true LEADER, he would be kicking Pelosi & Reid in the butt and tell them to get to work on legislation to get oversight into this bailout program instead of lining more people up at the trough!!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

missy, read more carefully next time. I said he would not be a police officer most places. Using narcotics is taken very seriously no matter what age, that besides the point. I voted for mccain, however, i’m ready to atleast give obama a shot, unlike the support most on the left gave bush his 1st term. I just believe there should be higher standards before politicans can run for office at the state or federal levels.

Posted by: dave | November 13, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

The question is not “are you a crook?”
The question is “have you ever accidentally admitted to being a crook?”

Posted by: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the O-Bomb | November 13, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

So I guess the idea is:
SARAH PALIN NEED NOT APPLY.
LOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | November 13, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Harry & Paula,
Its time to look at his actions, and so far it would kind to give him a grade of “C”.
There are things he should be doing. He is right in that there can only be one president, but he can persuade Pelosi & Reid to move on what the country really needs right now.
Already, we are hearing stories of misuse of those bailout funds. This money is being dispursed, with ZERO oversight!!!
For all of you who have been whining about Bush, get off your butts and call your liberal congressmen and DEMAND they move on oversight NOW!
This is already like opening up a pharmacy to drug addicts, with no one minding the store at all.
Next week they will be back asking for more!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

So I guess the idea is:
SARAH PALIN NEED NOT APPLY.
LOLOL
Posted by: R Mutt
—————————————
No, if she did, Obama would have to replace Biden with her…LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Nobody’s perfect. “All men” are worth shame… If God held the same standards to judge people as we do, no one would get into heaven… If we can’t forgive someone, why should God forgive us on the day we all will stand in front of him ??? Forgive all men of past indiscretions if they ask for it…

Posted by: Levi | November 13, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I think everybody should be reading these questions and seeing if they pertain to themselves. Maybe people (including me) will finally get more careful about what they post on the internet, or maybe they’ll get off cyberspace completely if they’re concerned about getting not just a government job, but any respectable job. Looks like the internet is not such a private space after all.

Posted by: liz | November 13, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Harry Tick: Landslide? Sir. Please. Obama won, but it was not a landslide. FDR win in 1932 and Reagan win in 1984 were landlsides. Obama only won by 6-7million more votes. That is less than the population of Indiana. I give the man credit. He is very well poised to be a good president. But this was no landslide friend.

Posted by: mm | November 13, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

independentview, I can not beleive how naive you are, but sore losers will resort to crawling in the mud. Hate was tolerated in the Republican stumping, why would it not be on here? Obama would not have gotten where he is at if he could not pass a security clearance. This is more of the fear mongering we have heard for the last 8 years. The American people are not stupid and over 53% of American believes the Republicans sold thier soul to the Devil in order to stay in power. We do know McCain sold his soul to the Republican party, he is no longer the Maverick I would have voted for in 2000. The reason McCain did not win the nomination in 2000 was that the republicans wanted a puppet and McCain was not but George was. The Republicans lied and made up stories about McCain in order to get Bush elected. Remember This:
Rove invented a uniquely injurious fiction for his operatives to circulate via a phony poll. Voters were asked, “Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain…if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?” This was no random slur. McCain was at the time campaigning with his dark-skinned daughter, Bridget, adopted from Bangladesh.
It worked. Owing largely to the Rove-orchestrated whispering campaign, Bush prevailed in South Carolina and secured the Republican nomination. The rest is history–specifically the tragic and blighted history of our young century. It worked in another way as well. Too shaken to defend himself, McCain emerged from the bruising episode less maverick reformer and more Manchurian candidate.
The former crusader against the Republican establishment has since turned into a Bush-hugging, business-as-usual politician who has backed down from many positions that set him apart from conventional conservatives. Before, McCain supported the separation of church and state; now he wants a Christian in the White House. The confederate flag, which he once considered an offensive symbol, no longer troubles him. And he has come to believe that tax cuts are a good idea.
I don’t want to say that McCain sold his soul to the devil, since I believe that religious metaphors have no place in politics. But consider this: shortly after losing the 2000 election, McCain told an interviewer that there must be “a special place in hell” reserved for the rumormongers.
Seven years later, who was running McCain’s South Carolina campaign? Charlie Condon, the former State Attorney General who in 2000 helped spread the innuendo targeting Bridget. If you can’t beat them, hire them–even if they’ve launched racist attacks against your own daughter.
Bridget McCain was a seriously ill baby in Mother Teresa’s orphanage when Cindy McCain visited and decided to bring her back to the United States for medical treatment in 1991. John and Cindy adopted her not long after. Now 16, Bridget learned of her role in the 2000 campaign only when she Googled herself. According to the New York Times, when McCain entered the current race, Bridget summoned his aides and asked them to pledge that this campaign would be different.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Pass an Obama background check!? OBAMA can’t even pass a background check. He couldn’t even be his own security guard.

Posted by: sandalwood | November 13, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

“Forgive all men of past indiscretions if they ask for it….”
———————————-
Nice sentiment, but not the best advice!
Try that on repeat criminal offenders & then go ask the families of the victims after the 3rd or 4th offense how that’s working for them!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Hmm, wonder if had Rahm Emauel or others he has appointed to fill out the same questionaire?

Posted by: Fran | November 13, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I doublt BO could pass his own backgound check. Pals with terrorist, uses illegal drugs, hangs around with gangsters in Chicago. How ironic is this? I think all idiots should apply!

Posted by: linda | November 13, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Onama couldn’t qualify for his own staff.
BWAHAHAH

Posted by: JamesJ | November 13, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Why does “he” need to know if you own a gun?

Posted by: freedomforall | November 13, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Based on this, Obama could not hire himself.

Posted by: Flagirl001 | November 13, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I doublt BO could pass his own backgound check. Pals with terrorist, uses illegal drugs, hangs around with gangsters in Chicago. How ironic is this? I think all idiots should apply!

Posted by: linda | November 13, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Well, I can see that the Kool-aid is still being served, and there are so many still lining up to guzzle it.
I would imagine they’re also writing $30 checks to the DNC to get their T-shirts.
Those who think there’s anything smart and reasonable about this are the real whack jobs. Scratch a liberal, find a fascist.

Posted by: cheeflo | November 13, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

mm: 350+ electoral votes is considered an ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE. Obama currently has at least 365 (still waiting on Missouri).
+7% Popular vote is considered a POPULAR LANDSLIDE. Obama is currently somewhere around +7.5%.
Face facts:
A LANDSLIDE IS A LANDSLIDE IS A LANDSLIDE.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 13, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

LOL —- Obama could not hire himself!!! LOL
First question should be: Were you born in the United States or Africa? LOL

Posted by: Mary | November 13, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

What about gifts? “Other than from relatives, or from close and longstanding personal friends on occasions such as birthdays or seasonal holidays, have you or your spouse ever received a gift exceeding $50.00 in value? Please identify the donor, the value of the gift, the date received and the circumstances in which the gift was received.”
Does this include the Rezco land deal Obama got? Or should we file that one under”Have you, your spouse, or any member of your immediate family ever worked with a financial, banking, insurance or mortgage institution currently the subject of federal government intervention as part of the financial meltdown? “This question includes but is not limited to, the following: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Washington Mutual.”
No I am mistaken that would be Obama’s community organizing days working as a lawyer for ACORN suing citibank in order to force them to provide mortages to unqualified/uncreditworthy home buyers. Would that count as working for the Fannie Mae Freddie Mac under investigation question?

Posted by: ctay | November 13, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I support Obama’s questionaire 100%. Can’t take any chances these days. I’m sure the answers won’t disqualify the perfect candidates, but at least Obama’s going to know who his staff is and won’t be caught like a deer in the headlight if something comes up!

Posted by: JoJo | November 13, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

These things are bogus and everybody knows it. Bush had a DUI and Cheney had TWO of them. Background checks are only for “little people.” Anyone who’s connected can get away with murder. (Just ask Ted Kennedy if you don’t believe me.)

Posted by: Bruce | November 13, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

A LANDSLIDE IS A LANDSLIDE IS A LANDSLIDE.
YO MUTT…..
LBJ won 486 – 52, but did not even run in 1968. A LANDSLIDE also can bury you in the process!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

So I guess the idea is:
SARAH PALIN NEED NOT APPLY.
LOLOL
Posted by: R Mutt | Nov 13, 2008 12:15:09 PM
@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Hey MUTT — Sarah is not applying for this Bozo show!!! Sarah will throw Obama out of the White House in 2012!!! LOL LOL

Posted by: Mary | November 13, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I’m not surprised at all at a lot of the questions and in fact I find them to be applicable. I am surprised however that one of the questions refers to Freddie and Fannie Mac since his newly appointed Chief of Staff is directly related to rumors of involvement during a period of improper management practices! I think Obama will fare well utilizing this question format in making his decisions on his appointments. It doesn’t mean someone will not be considered, it just means he will have a heads up in advance should anyone question his choices and will be able to properly respond to any questions directed at his choices!

Posted by: Michael Mumblow | November 13, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I support Obama’s questionaire 100%. Can’t take any chances these days. I’m sure the answers won’t disqualify the perfect candidates, but at least Obama’s going to know who his staff is and won’t be caught like a deer in the headlight if something comes up!
Posted by: JoJo
JOJO,
Your absolutely right!!! Because we all know that no one he selects will lie on any of those questions!!!!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Question #1 – Have you ever been employed by Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, Goldman Sachs, or the by the City of Chicago and its Democratic party? (If your answer is “yes” to any of these, then please skip the rest of this sham questionaire and go to the personnel office to get your security pass. You are hired!)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 13, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Its over
stop already.
A great “Fill Out This Job Application”,
we might get honest people.

Posted by: GHM | November 13, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

So people are complaining because Obama is implementing a system to address these issues before they get criticized for not doing it after some boggle head cries about it on right-wing radio and television. The questions are invasive and hard for me to even answer…like…have I ever sent a txt, email or electronic message that might be considered an embarrassment to me, neighbor, associates, president or my dog? I’ve sent a lot of things over the years so my answer to that one would be yes, but quickly respond with Ronald Reagan’s “I can’t remember what it was.” With more than 78% of America saying they support Obama, we have the less than 20% of those who make up the groups of Klan’s, gangs and radical religions, who stand out for so many people to see and come to understand how they have been lied to and directed to go against their fellowman. I think its great Obama is finding these people out and even better I am happy that these groups of hate pockets throughout our country are now exposed and easy for hoodwinked Americans to finally see and identify.

Posted by: reraz | November 13, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Obama was shouting “Change” all through his campaign and NOW we know that was a BIG LIE!!! He is bringing in all the Clinton administration!! THAT FOLKS IS NOT CHANGE!!!!!!!
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!!! SHAME ON YOU BARACK!!!

Posted by: Marie | November 13, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Those are standard questions asked on any security clearance questionnaire, one which countless Americans, including myself, have had to fill out, with all of the accompanying research, stacks of paperwork, and potentially embarrassing questions. Depending on how you’ve lived your life, if you have nothing to hide, then it shouldn’t be a problem. With the kinds of information and responsibility the highest office in the land requires you to be privy to, it’s crucial that the background check be passed. No, it’s not easy. But if you want the job, you do it. It’s that simple. If not, there are other choices for a career path someone might choose. Like fry cook, for instance.

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

these questions wouldn’t need to be asked if we weren’t all so sure that the republicans will be gassing up their attack machine to crawl under every rock and sift thru the trash of these potential candidates in order to cause trouble for the new administration!

Posted by: michelle | November 13, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Obama could not pass this test. And he could not get a TOP SECRET security clearance either.
====
right.. that national security briefing was open to the public.
where do you rednecks get your info?
ohhh.. I forgot, Fox Noise! and Rush!

Posted by: Gus | November 13, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Athough i am not a citizen of the United States But i ador the faith been buid up by Barack Obama and with a good hope i believe he is going to leed the United States and even the world in general in his parfections due all none is 100%complete so we have to give him time and apreciate his confidence and the background of whom he wanna be.
Africa have never been good without the influence of the United States Government like wise the Middle East have encounter alot from those previous regimes who set up cruelity and domination against the worl ut i believe as a Muslim that in one way or the other that Obama is goig to make the world once again associte to each other.
and i indeed would like to use this opportunity to call upon all our African leaders to imitate the good spirits of the American democracy more especially Nigeria.

Posted by: EL-Mealan | November 13, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Wow!! Obama can ask those questions about his staff but when the media asked Obama about those same issues he said they were not relevant. The guy becomes more of a hypocrite every day..

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Those are standard questions asked on any security clearance questionnaire, one which countless Americans, including myself, have had to fill out, with all of the accompanying research, stacks of paperwork, and potentially embarrassing questions. Depending on how you’ve lived your life, if you have nothing to hide, then it shouldn’t be a problem. With the kinds of information and responsibility the highest office in the land requires you to be privy to, it’s crucial that the background check be passed. No, it’s not easy. But if you want the job, you do it. It’s that simple. If not, there are other choices for a career path someone might choose. Like fry cook, for instance.

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Have you ever done anything that might embarass the President? What BS! How about doing drugs? How about renegging on contracts signed and going back on his word? How about outright lying to the public?
Could BO actually pass his own questionnaire? I doubt it…

Posted by: Al | November 13, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Funny how someone’s using my name. This is my original & only post on this topic.
Those are standard questions asked on any security clearance questionnaire, one which countless Americans, including myself, have had to fill out, with all of the accompanying research, stacks of paperwork, and potentially embarrassing questions. Depending on how you’ve lived your life, if you have nothing to hide, then it shouldn’t be a problem. With the kinds of information and responsibility the highest office in the land requires you to be privy to, it’s crucial that the background check be passed. No, it’s not easy. But if you want the job, you do it. It’s that simple. If not, there are other choices for a career path someone might choose. Like fry cook, for instance.

Posted by: KellyKH | November 13, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I raise my right hand.
I shout out: Obama Rules.
I move forward in the Obama
army to rule the world.
I pledge allegiance to Obama,
ruler of the United States of America,
and to his supporters for whom he stands,
one nation under Obama,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for HIS friends.
Posted by: toneyal | Nov 13, 2008 12:12:30 PM
————————————-
GET A GRIP – HE IS NOT RULER OF THE WORLD!!! LOL
NOW LET’S SEE IF NOBAMA WILL PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO OUR FLAG!!! LOL…

Posted by: Mary | November 13, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“Potential source of embarassment” could be twisted around to mean anything. A lot of the comments on news sites like this could be considered part of it.
This is scary stuff.
I like Obama, but if this becomes commonplace in job searches, it will eventually lead to the destruction of free speech and art in our society.

Posted by: Emily | November 13, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

“Who does that low-life piece of trash called the President-elect think he is?”
He thinks he’s the graduate of Harvard Law, the constitutional law professor, the state and US senator, the faithful husband and father who earned 52.4% of the popular vote and 364 electoral votes (so far).
If you really consider a man of Obama’s accomplishments “a low-life piece of trash,” then what can your opinion be of the 95% of americans who are not as accoplished as Obama is?
“He is filth at the bottom of the barrel not fit to lick any American’s shoes.”
On what “evidence” is your opinion based? On his skin color, perhaps?
If so, that is indeed a trashy, bottom-of-the-barrel attitude to wallow in.
PS Only people with no real argument resort to ad hominem attacks. Look it up, then look in the mirror to find the source of your hatred for Obama. He got elected President of the United States. What have you accomplished?

Posted by: Harry Tichbaum | November 13, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Maybe it should ask if they ever sat in a church for 20 years listening to sermons of hate. Maybe it should ask if they have any business, personal or political relationships with unrepentent terrorists. Maybe it should ask if they have any relationships with organizations who fraudulently register voters. The list of hypocrisy could go on and on..

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Gus,
Get the facts straight instead of constantly portraying yourself as a public moron!
The President & VP do not get clearances!
Our point is that if Citizen Obama was to apply for one, he would have major problems obtaining it!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Athough i am not a citizen of the United States But i ador the faith been buid up by Barack Obama and with a good hope i believe he is going to leed the United States and even the world in general in his parfections due all none is 100%complete so we have to give him time and apreciate his confidence and the background of whom he wanna be.
Africa have never been good without the influence of the United States Government like wise the Middle East have encounter alot from those previous regimes who set up cruelity and domination against the worl ut i believe as a Muslim that in one way or the other that Obama is goig to make the world once again associte to each other.
and i indeed would like to use this opportunity to call upon all our African leaders to imitate the good spirits of the American democracy more especially Nigeria.
Posted by: EL-Mealan | Nov 13, 2008 12:48:17 PM
——————————–
EL-Mealan – tell us were you living in Africa when Barack was born there??? Was Barack’s grandmother in Africa when Barack was born there – she told the news she was?
We Americans would love to know the answer to this question? We would like to know what country to bless for this event!

Posted by: Marie | November 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

On what “evidence” is your opinion based? On his skin color, perhaps?
Hey HARRY THE RACIST….give it rest already!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Harry Tichbaum: So far all Obama has done is get promoted. That is what is wrong with him. He gets a job and doesn’t go to work. Instead he applies for another job. When he gaets that one instead of going to work he applies for another one. Where does it end? The guy is a typical fool who runs a cosntant campaign. Even his administration is taking the form of a campaign.

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Harry Tichbaum: So far all Obama has done is get promoted. That is what is wrong with him. He gets a job and doesn’t go to work. Instead he applies for another job. When he gaets that one instead of going to work he applies for another one. Where does it end? The guy is a typical fool who runs a cosntant campaign. Even his administration is taking the form of a campaign.

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

you people are all missing the point – these are questions on an application- it doesn’t mean that if you answer yes to any you don’t pass or won’t be hired. It simply means he is fully vetting his staff. I should think everyone would agree he should know who is working with him and if there is something in their background that has the potential to impede their ability to do the job they are applying for. Frankly if more employers took the same approach we would finally cease to see news stories about pedaphiles working as teachers and convicted drug dealers working in hospitals,etc. Further you can difuse a potential problem if you are in a position of offense (like Obama’s drug use as a teen) much more effectively than you can after some investigative reporter turns it into the #1 feature on the nightly news!

Posted by: Lisa | November 13, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Republicans hate, I wonder what god thinks of that.
Posted by: USCITIZEN_04
———————————–
You may want to update your list with all those dems that have had similar issues USCITIZEN!
You never know, God may just be a REPUBLICAN!
LOL

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Hey Kelly have you ever sat in your house under god and Hated? You agree with everything you hear at church right? You agree with everybody in your house hold right? People choose to beleive what they will, but actions speak and we all see the hate you and people like you spread. Is this hate you spread all in the name of god?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Where do you hide Obamas paycheck? AT WORK…

Posted by: Kelly | November 13, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Hey Mike there is only one god and he is everybody’s god.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Kelly,
Great Analysis!!
Obama is just like our current education system, just pass ‘em along wether he is ready for the next step or not!
Well….no more next steps now…
BO,…watch your back Nancy Pelosi can smell fear!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Hey Mike there is only one god and he is everybody’s god.
CIT,
Still…….you never know, he or SHE may be REPUBLICAN!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Barrack Huseein Obama is a TRAGEDY for America.
All of you…just wait and see! what will happen in his 1460 days in the White House!
It is tragic that America is in the hands of a Mutt ! no caliber! no pedigree!

Posted by: universe2069 | November 13, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Question #1 – Have you ever been employed by Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, Goldman Sachs, or the by the City of Chicago and its Democratic party? (If your answer is “yes” to any of these, then please skip the rest of this sham questionairre and go to the personnel office to get your security pass. You are hired!)
Question #2 – Have you ever had close associations to a member of a terrorist organization, a convicted slumlord or a openly racist clergyman? (If your answer is “yes” to all of these, then you are supremely qualified for a very high management position with us. We regret to inform you this unique position is already filled. Please contact the Democratic National Commitee to find out how you can go about filling this position about eight years from now.)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 13, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

“Hey Kelly have you ever sat in your house under god and Hated? You agree with everything you hear at church right? You agree with everybody in your house hold right? People choose to beleive what they will, but actions speak and we all see the hate you and people like you spread. Is this hate you spread all in the name of god?”
CIT,
I have heard some people speak like Rev Wright during my 50 yrs on this earth. I did not hang around for 20 yrs to keep listening to it!!!!
Get A clue already…EVEN Oprah left that church!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Letter from the Boss,
As the CFO of this business that employs 140 people, I have
resigned myself to the fact that Barrack Obama will be our
next President, and that our taxes and government fees will
increase in a BIG way.
To compensate for these increases, I figure that the Clients
will have to see an increase in our fees to them of about 8%
but since we cannot increase our fees right now due to the
dismal state of our economy, we will have to lay off six of
our employees instead. This has really been eating at me for a
while, as we believe we are family here and I didn’t know how
to choose who will have to go.
So, this is what I did. I strolled thru our parking lot and
found 8 Obama bumper stickers on our employees’ cars and have
decided these folks will be the first to be laid off. I can’t
think of a more fair way to approach this problem. These folks
wanted change; I gave it to them.
If you have a better idea, let me know.
Sincerely,
The Boss

Posted by: Corey B | November 13, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

To call Obama a ruler is to shame all the veterans and those that have died to serve this country. America has no ruler but it’s people and it’s Constitution. I have my own thoughts of the job Obama will do but will give him the time and then decide if he is right or wrong for America. The people of America have spoken whether they be alive, dead or cartoon character. I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic.

Posted by: American50 | November 13, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

I honestly think that if Obama wasn’t the president elect and just an average Joe, he would have problems getting a secret clearance, much less a top secret. He would at least have to elaborate.

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

I agree this would be a tough test for most anyone to pass, but we’re not talking about people applying to work just anywhere. We should hold people at this level to a higher standard and I have no issue with it. I also know that Obama and his chosen administration will be looked at under a microscope, with the media making it their mission to expose anything remotely embarassing about anyone he chooses for his administration. He’s a smart guy who understands the dynamics he’s stepping into, and he wants a top notch, well-respected, highly-informed NO-drama team around him so he can set about getting things done for us without unnecessary distraction. This is why I voted for him, and this is why I know I was right. He’s not even President yet, and I already really like what I see. There is reason for great hope, and we should all embrace it.

Posted by: nancy miller | November 13, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Oh Mike I did look for Democrats with simular issues could not find those I did find these…..But no sex crimes with children you can do a serach of both parties of listed crimes.
- Rep. Charles Diggs Jr., D-Mich., was convicted in 1978 of operating a payroll kickback scheme in his congressional office. He served seven months of a three-year prison term. He was re-elected, then resigned in 1980.
- Rep. Michael Myers, D-Pa., served 20 1/2 months of a three-year prison sentence for accepting bribes from FBI agents impersonating Arab businessmen. He was convicted in 1980 and expelled from Congress.
- Four other House members were convicted in the Arab businessmen bribery scandal: Democratic Reps. John Murphy of New York, Frank Thompson of New Jersey, John Jenrette of South Carolina and Raymond Lederer of Pennsylvania. Thompson and Murphy were sentenced to three years; Jenrette, two years; and Lederer, one year.
- Rep. Mario Biaggi, D-N.Y., was convicted in 1988 of extorting nearly $2 million from defense contractor Wedtech Corp. He resigned from Congress and served two years and two months of an eight-year sentence. He was defeated in his 1992 re-election bid.
- Rep. Mel Reynolds, D-Ill., was sentenced in 1995 to five years in prison for having sex with an underage campaign worker. He resigned from Congress, then was sentenced in 1997 to 6 1/2 years for bank fraud and other violations. The second sentence, which was to run at the same time as the first, was commuted in 2001 by President Clinton.
- Rep. Walter Tucker III, D-Calif., was sentenced in 1996 to two years and three months in prison for accepting and demanding bribes while mayor of a Los Angeles suburb. He resigned from Congress a week after his 1995 conviction.
- Rep. Dan Rostenkowski, D-Ill., pleaded guilty in 1996 to two felony mail fraud charges, lost re-election and served 15 months in prison. Clinton pardoned him in 2000.
- Rep. James A. Trafficant, D-Ohio, was convicted of 10 counts of bribery, conspiracy and racketeering, expelled from Congress and sentenced in 2002 to eight years in prison.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Obama puts in his books stuff like “I did drugs” so that the media will leave the issue alone and not investigate since he confessed! WRONG but the media swallowed this and many other stories and that is why he was elected!!! This guy was paying attention when he was at Harvard!!! The crooks that paid for his education got there money’s worth but NOW IT IS BARACK’s TIME TO PAY THE CROOKS BACK!!! Fasten your seat belts!!! END OF STORY!!!!

Posted by: Lorie | November 13, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

will Obama himself would pass this ?
I would count 100s of violations by Obama on this appliation, starting with asking a criminal’s wife (read rezko) to buy his backyard…

Posted by: nimdik | November 13, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

That he is asking these questions is good. From everything I’ve read this is NOT a test to exclude people from jobs but rather to ensure full disclosure of the part of those chosen for positions.
President-elect Obama will have his hands full — from having to fix the government, to economy, to medical care, international relations, and, and, and. These questionnaires can be an excellent means of avoiding trip falls such as the Clinton Whitewater investigation (where no wrong doing was found, but lead to impeach for a consensual sexual affair.)
The religious wrong will pull out all stops to prevent his carrying out of the separation of church and state (the Catholic church and various evangelical groups have already come out fighting.) This knowledge will help ensure his ability to govern in a manner we desperately need to ensure our survival as a nation and as a species.

Posted by: lennyp | November 13, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Mike God is not bias and does not belong to a party. God loves everyone.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

EL-Mealan (from Africa)
- tell us were you living in Africa when Barack was born there??? Was Barack’s grandmother in Africa when Barack was born there – she told the news she was?
We Americans would love to know the answer to this question? We would like to know what country to bless for this event!

Posted by: Marie | November 13, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I had to fill out similar form for a position in the government. I don’t think it is limited to Obama staff. If you work in anything remotely related to Homeland Security, you are really scrutinized. It’s just the way it is.

Posted by: Theresa | November 13, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

LOL you poor republicans are still stating Obama was not born in America, you are too funny McCain was not born in America.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

At least the Obama camp is AWARE of these problems, and it trying to come to grips with potential threats. That puts Obama an arm and a leg ahead of Bush, Mr. “I don’t understand email” McCain, and most especially Gov. Sarah “Yahoo” Palin.

Posted by: Jordan | November 13, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Hi all -
Just remember that MOST candidates tend to not ‘tell the truth and nothing but the truth’ while running for office. Well in a way this is sort of a ‘mini’ election. How many of you honestly believe they’ll tell the truths on their JOB applications for some high powered position. If Mr. Obama thinks they will then I feel very sorry for him…(and for us)

Posted by: newtonianlass | November 13, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

“Guys, take a deep breath, turn of Fox News, get a life and accept this fact — Barack Obama is your President– Salute Him.”
——————–
Did you consciously or subconsciously use a capital “H” when you wrote “Salute Him”? He’s not God, but apparently you think he is.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

USCITIZEN_04,
Without having to resort to google…..
Lets start with Clinton….”I Never had sexual….”
Charlie Rangel….just too stupid to know he had to report income from a rental propery for 20 years! Even though he has been in charge of the tax code for past 2 years! (But no need to step down from the chair…noooo)
Tim Mahoney and his sex scandals….
im sure if i wanted to spend the time, i can match one by one all your hits….
My point was simple…BOTH parties….and EVERY administration has had their share of ethics issues!
This new one will be no different!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Dear ABC -
Can you PLEASE get spell check for these posts – in reading nearly 80% have something misspelled. Help out your fellow Americans! Please!

Posted by: newtonianlass | November 13, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

LOL you poor republicans are still stating Obama was not born in America, you are too funny McCain was not born in America.
CIT,
On this point we do agree! Enough with all the BS over birth certificates! Both Obama & McCain are US Citizens! Only a total idiot would keep up this line of BS!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

to bad they didn’t ask these questions of obama himself

Posted by: dave | November 13, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

I think we all should be thinking President Bush for keeping us safe over the last 8 years and pray that Obama will not screw up the Military and cut 25% of the funding. We live in a world where we need our GREAT MILITARY and not just 75% of it.

Posted by: OhNo | November 13, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

First Question?
Do you have any terrorist friend?
Second Question?
Do you have any Amrican Heting friend?

Posted by: adan | November 13, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

sorry should be Thanking not thinking President Bush. and I did not vote for Obama but I wish him the best and hope I am wrong about him.

Posted by: OhNo | November 13, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

“These questionnaires can be an excellent means of avoiding trip falls such as the Clinton Whitewater investigation (where no wrong doing was found, but lead to impeach for a consensual sexual affair.)”
WOW…it really is hard to beleive that so many of you are this nieve!!!!
Do you honestly beleive that everyone who gets handed those questions is going to fully, completely & HONESTLY answer each and every one of them?
LOL….I guarantee you that before the 2010 elections there will be a few mysterious resignations from this administration!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

OH Kelly,
You sound bitter!! I can’t wait for President Obama to spread the wealth, starts paling around with terrorist and converts our government to socialism. Oh, ruins this country by starting a senseless war and damages our reputation around the world… Did I miss anything?

Posted by: FYI | November 13, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Kelly:
“So far all Obama has done is get promoted.” So are you implying that all of the people who have ever voted for him have completely disregarded his legislative record on the state and federal level? Check out his website for his legislative accomplishments.
“He gets a job and doesn’t go to work. Instead he applies for another job.
. . . . The guy is a typical fool who runs a cosntant campaign.”
Unfortunately, that is the nature of american politics: a candidate must run for almost two years to be elected
POTUS. Are you worried that the other 98 senators couldn’t get the job done without Obama and McCain present for every vote? Obama voted for the most recent G.I. Bill, while McCain was a no-show. Way to support the troops & vets, John.
“Even his administration is taking the form of a campaign.” Awesome! He ran his primary campaign so well that he beat the unbeatable Clinton Political Machine; then he and his community organizers annihilated the GOP in the general. Imagine what an administration that is that well-organized can do to solve our nation’s many problems. Or are you one of the 46% who voted for Unstable & Unable who would rather see our nation’s problems go unsolved just so you can throw it in the face of the 52.4% who voted for Obama?

Posted by: Harry Tichbaum | November 13, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Oh boy we have a shiny new toy!!!!! Just wait folks it will become dull and no one will want it anymore.

Posted by: Punky Mama | November 13, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

UScITIZEN O4 = why aren’t you listing any republicans? There are many with crimes they have comitted, no one is perfect.
I respect Obama for having this questionaire. Maybe others should have used one like it.
I think he is really trying to clean things up, and this is the start. There are so many that shouldn’t be near Washington.
I would hope that you people would give him a chance. He is taking office in extremely bad times, and I think he is working very hard to make sure he has the right people in his cabinet that can help straighten this out.
He has some of the top people working with him on the economy and I think he will do all he can to straighten this out. Just ask yourself, what has Bush done to help the economy????
Give him a chance – he hasn’t even taken office yet and all of you are criticizing him. He’s a very smart man and I don’t think he is going to take any chances that will hurt us.
Do you honestly think that McCain/Palin could have done better???? Palin doesn’t know policies, and didn’t even know what the vp does.

Posted by: smt | November 13, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I think we all should be thanking President Bush for keeping us safe over the last 8 years and pray that Obama will not screw up the Military and cut 25% of the funding. We live in a world where we need our GREAT MILITARY and not just 75% of it.
To add. We do not need a civilian army that is going to be greater then our military. This is what the national guard is for. The 8 years Bush has been President there was no need to even use the National Guard on our soil, let alone to have a civilian police guard. I am afraid Obama is going to screw up the safety of our country with this type of thinking. I also agree that I hope I am wrong about Obama and we stay safe for the next 4 years.

Posted by: Agree | November 13, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I think it is funny that people are complaining about the “very personal questions” that are being asked. I think the higher you go in this government, the more you and your family should expect to be an open book. The way I see it, if it is not found out now, it will be found out later, and the media will make sure that is all we hear about for at least two weeks (a month if the story is supper juicy). I also don’t think that a “yes” to a certain question is automatically going to keep you out; they just might want to know if you can be honest.
I also think it is good to know the true nature of the people you are going to associate yourself with when you run on a platform of change. You probably don’t want the underage intern texting, prostitute buying, drug taking, wife beating, secret Klan member, closet case who abuses his illegal alien maid.
Everyone is waiting for Obama to make a mistake, take a wrong turn, befriend or recommend the wrong person. Obama has built himself up on a big platform and now he has to at least try to stick to it
If it where me, anyone who presented me with a squeaky clean questioner would be immediately removed from the process. . .they are obviously a liar.

Posted by: lisa b in ne | November 13, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

OhNo.. News flash!! George Bush is definitely the worse President of my life time, but thanks his actions we’re despised around the world. Not for our freedom but because of arrogance and ignorance…

Posted by: FYI | November 13, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama’s security detail, aka secret service, must pass stringent scrutiny
and background checks.
Anyone truly believe that Obama could do
the same?

Posted by: littleleers | November 13, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

smt Please don’t say anything about Palin when Biden lied the whole way through the debate. You have the biggest liar or alzhiemer VP ever to take office.

Posted by: What??? | November 13, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

smt, I did list them but is was to large to put them all on here, Mike wanted the Democrat list so I gave it to him. But there is a big difference between the two list. In the Republican list of crimes most are agaist children in a sexual nature you can look yourself. On the Democrat side you saw what I found. On Yahoo search ask for a list of Republican convicted of crimes you can also search under Democrats, but you will find the short list I posted for the Democrats compared to the lengthily one of the Republicans I can not fit on this post.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I don’t see a thing wrong with these questions. Wouldn’t it have been good if we had known about Foley’s offensive emails, for example? As to gun ownership, what’s wrong with asking about that? He’s only asking a question, not passing judgment.
And this business about Senator Obama not being able to pass a security clearance. I’ve been reading that one for months but I have yet to see any proof, much like the fake birth certificate story. Can anyone supply me with proof that he did not pass a security clearance?

Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | November 13, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Yes there was need to use the national guard, but they were in Iraq Remember the Hurricanes and the looting. To add. We do not need a civilian army that is going to be greater then our military. This is what the national guard is for. The 8 years Bush has been President there was no need to even use the National Guard on our soil,

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

What??? lol to funny Palin does not even know the constitution of the United States. The spin goes on………….

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Sounds like they’re keeping files they can use later, Scientology style.

Posted by: ugh | November 13, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Question #33 asks about your taxes for 2005. I wonder if this is really President Elect Obama’s questionaire or one borrowed from someone else.

Posted by: RW | November 13, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

You people are getting way to worked up over obama. At this point he only has a job. If he dares double cross the people that elected him and the people he is bound to garner his respect, he’s
gone. This is America. This has replayed itself many times is our history. He modeled afer a tipical preacher.

Posted by: ZZ | November 13, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

What??? lol to funny Palin does not even know the constitution of the United States. The spin goes on………….

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Is there a question on there that asks, “Is there anything on your birth certificate that would be embarrassing?” (Note: BHO need not answer this question)

Posted by: It's Me! | November 13, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

This questionaire is used to go back into your history, internet, emails and erase it all before someone finds it! They don’t care how you answer it! They just want to clean it up!

Posted by: swever | November 13, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

And this business about Senator Obama not being able to pass a security clearance. I’ve been reading that one for months but I have yet to see any proof
————————————-
Ask anyone who has ever had to obtain one of those clearances for thier job!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

REGARDING OBAMA’S CITIZEN STATUS:
People, let’s set the record straight once and for all so that we can move on to real issues. If even one of a child’s parents is a natural-born US citizen, then that child is also, by birthright, a US citizen–NO MATTER WHERE ON OR OFF THE PLANET THE BIRTH TOOK PLACE. For example, John McCain was born in Panama, while his father was serving as an admiral. Does that make him Panamanian? No, that makes him a US citizen. If a pregnant US citizen happens to give birth while vacationing or living in a country other than the US, THAT BABY IS A US CITIZEN by virtue of being the offspring of a US citizen. Now, Obama’s mama was a native-born US citizen from Kansas, the heart of the US. You can’t get any more american than than Kansas. So, unless you have some tangible evidence that proves that Obama’s mother was NOT a US citizen, your “argument” about Obama’s “suspicious” Hawaiian birth certificate is a moot, invalid, NON-issue. Therefore, my bitter republican friends, find a real issue to undermine the legitimacy of Obama’s DECISIVE, electorally-DEVASTATING victory over McCain, Palin, and the whole republican party.

Posted by: Harry Tichbaum | November 13, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Ask anyone who has ever had to obtain one of those clearances for thier job!
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 13, 2008 1:57:14 PM
Okay Mike_C, I asked my son. He was military and had a high security clearance. He told me he has no idea whether or not Barack Obama failed to get a security clearance. What I want is proof. It’s like the birth certificate thing: There is no proof. Before anyone goes spouting off with these stories there should be some proof to back you up. If you can’t prove what you’re saying, then DON’T SAY IT!

Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | November 13, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Harry,
You are 100% correct. And He Won!
Then again so did Herbert Hoover, he had an even bigger landslide victory!
You better hope Obama is better historian than Biden!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

So they are going to claim that Appointees to the BO Administration are made up of God-Like humans who have never done anything wrong… hehehehehhe…… they are using BO’s Whitehouse Transition Donations in an attempt to cleanup all their appointees backgrounds i.e.….. delete emails, shred documents etc etc and pre-makeup the press releases to put out if they are discovered….. hehehhehehheh…. or is this an attempt to try to get the already bias media NOT To LOOK for stuff on their Appointees…i.e. If BO clears them their clean… hehehheheheh

Posted by: MediaTalkingPoints | November 13, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

corey b……….ditto.

Posted by: catman | November 13, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

I say “once bitten, twice shy”.
I heard on 60 minutes when Obama’s campaign managers were talking about the Rev. Wright fiasco, they had no knowledge of this being in the works before being spattered across the airwaves.
No ones slate is clean, but being up front with issues saves alot of finger pointing later.

Posted by: nonnarrowminde | November 13, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

MediaTalkingPoints, what happened to all the White house e-mails under this Bush administration? Oh yes they were lost or deleted….

Posted by: uscitizen_04 | November 13, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

MediaTalkingPoints, what happened to all the White house e-mails under this Bush administration? Oh yes they were lost or deleted….
Posted by: uscitizen_04
———————————–
CIT,
No, they were hacked into and destoyed by David Kernell, son of Tennessee Democrat Mike Kernell….. Remember him & Palin’s email??????

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

That was only Palin’s e-mails on Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail not the White House e-mails.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Here come the jokes. He is shaping up to be a nutjob. Is he going to ask for saliva samples to? Will he personally taste each one? What is wrong with these people? Hiring a bunch of droids is NOT a good idea

Posted by: yonka | November 13, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Thankfully someone has learned from the current administration. All top government employees are supposed to have been reviewed like this. It just appears that Obama has updated his to include “new” technology ie email, texting, blogging etc… These questions are also to test honesty of applicants, many of the questions asked have already been researched on the background reviews.

Posted by: Native | November 13, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

That was only Palin’s e-mails on Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail not the White House e-mails.
——————————–
CIT,
Dig Deep…remember sarcasm???????

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

“Thankfully someone has learned from the current administration. All top government employees are supposed to have been reviewed like this. It just appears that Obama has updated his to include “new” technology ie email, texting, blogging etc… These questions are also to test honesty of applicants, many of the questions asked have already been researched on the background reviews. ”
Native,
your right, he is just so so smart. By the way you can bring your laptop back inside now, you don’t need to be sitting there by the mailbox. NewsFlash….He is not going to send you any check!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Did I miss something? Where are the questions concerning the use or distribution of hard core drugs? Where I work, that would automatically disqualify you for the job. Apparently not so for the job of president.

Posted by: bbs | November 13, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

bbs Ask Bush about it he used Cocaine but still is the President, plus the DUI’s

Posted by: uscitizen_04 | November 13, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

USCitizen_04: Two wrongs don’t make a right. I voted for Gore. It seems the answers by Obama supporters are always the same. He did it too.

Posted by: bbs | November 13, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

I now wish I had never voted for this fooo.

Posted by: davectrep | November 13, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Mike_C
your right, he is just so so smart. By the way you can bring your laptop back inside now, you don’t need to be sitting there by the mailbox. NewsFlash….He is not going to send you any check!!!
Why are you so angry? Just because I know a bit about the subject and am not surprised by it? I do congratulate him on updating the review formula. Also from what I read of Barack Obama’s administration he would not mail a check he would have it wired into that already verified account. Wink

Posted by: Native | November 13, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

There is nothing wrong in getting a full disclosure of the background and hopefully it will be appropriately assessed. The people have been fair in ignoring the associations and controversial words of Obama and presumably the Obama transition team will take things in perspective and not hire robots who have never led or accomplished anything significant in their lives because they were afraid to make mistakes but have driven by speed limits and never questioned authority and never freely expressed their views.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 13, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

These are softball questions. How about the question relating to 1) have you ever associated with terrorists? ( AYERS)2) Do you have any criminal friends or associated with whom you have done financial transaction? RIZKO 3) Have you ever worked for any organization which is under investigation for criminal activites? ACORN. Have you associated with Communicsts/Marxists?

Posted by: brian | November 13, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Native,
Not angry, just amazed at how so many people believe this is this first time anyone has done this and that by doing this your eliminate the possibility of an embarassing ethics scandal.
This is SOP, and has been for decades! It has not stopped the scandals before and wont now!
If you want to keep riding on magic carpet, by all means enjoy! At some point, you will have to land and see things as they really are.

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

“Can anyone supply me with proof that he did not pass a security clearance?

Such does not exist. Specialists in the field of obtaining security clearances have stated on the record that Obama would have no serious obstacles in obtaining clearance to work for the FBI or Secret Service.
While the question never arose, one would assume that McCain could also pass such a check, despite his associations with felons and racists like Hagee, Liddy and Keating, among others.
There is simply nothing of substance in either man’s history sufficient to conclude that they would pose any risk to national security, paranoid crackpot conjectures nothwithstanding.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

The question is Could Obama pass this test? Probably not. Wow!

Posted by: Sharon/American | November 13, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

It is getting so that if you are not Jesus Christ, you cannot work or earn a living. We are all sinners.

Posted by: Georgia Muller | November 13, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

“Specialists in the field of obtaining security clearances have stated on the record that Obama would have no serious obstacles in obtaining clearance to work for the FBI or Secret Service.”
Yukon,
since you seem to have a good handle on this, why dont you provide us with the names of these specialists and who they work for.

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

It is amazing that america is so afraid of smart people. this guy is dotting every I and crossing every T and you think he is doing something fishy? what is wrong with you people? don’t you know the world is watching you, or do you really care. look at the stste of your union, and look at the other option you had to do the job that Mr. Obama was elected for.

Posted by: barry | November 13, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Oh, the irony of Obama requiring a background check! This is killing me! Please STOP already. I’m dying!

Posted by: LongT | November 13, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

What is the purpose of the gun ownership question? Does Obama not want “those people”.
The number of guns someone owns is a private matter. Where’s the right to privacy?

Posted by: B.C | November 13, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Harry, actually you are not US citizen simply if a parent is American. Military children are because they are born on US military bases which is considered American soil. Bottom line is that Barack Obama is a proud American and more than deserving of ihs win.

Posted by: misscoty1 | November 13, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I think every one needs to quit whining. What he is doing is ensuring that the mistakes that have happened in the past are not going to continue to happen. If a logical person sat and thought about it, most of you would realize this. Think about all the people in the past that have had access to the white house. Think about the all the times a persons past has come back to haunt them just because of the position that they have. Its not like these people are applying for a typical desk job. This is the white house for cripes sakes! In an idealistic world personal and work could remain separate but those days are long gone. I think he is doing a great job.

Posted by: Nicolerachelle78 | November 13, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

This makes complete sense.
Of course you have a right to privacy—you don’t have to apply for the job.
Many jobs require that you answer personal questions or pass a background check.
My sister recently took the state bar exam and had to fill out a moral character exam that was 30 pages! It asked for everywhere she had worked or lived or gone to school, if she had committed a crime or done anything that would constitute “moral turpitude.”
Obama is smart to do these checks.

Posted by: Marine Vet | November 13, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

We already know that BO is hiding all his college papers…. hummmmm what kind of secrets does he have….like who sold/provided him the cocaine ……….

Posted by: MediaTalkingPoints | November 13, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Hey he knows the republican machine is ready to tear his stuff apart.They and folk that agree with their mentality are waiting for a scandal.All any one has on him are 5 second out of context clips of rev. wright and that he knows a PARDONED Bill Ayers. Hey despite all of that a vast majority of voting Americans voted for Barack Obama.He is smart to weed out any scandals before they come. Anyone speaking against this is just plain moronic.

Posted by: TV | November 13, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Who says any of this information would automatically count someone out of a position? It means: no surprises, thank you very much. If I’m putting you on my cabinet, you represent me and you represent the United States.
Right to privacy is the argument people use when they only want to complain, and to anyone calling all of this ironic: Sen. Barack Obama is THE President-elect. Get used to it because the election is over.

Posted by: Susan | November 13, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

He is smart to weed out any scandals before they come. Anyone speaking against this is just plain moronic.
TV,
So when the first scanal hits, Obama is by definition a moron?
Only a true moron would be stupid enough to think that in the world of politics you are going to know everyone’s skeletons ahead of time!
I will stated the facts again, BOTH sides of the aisle and EVERY administration has ethics issues! This one will be no different!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Its about time. Every president elect should ask these questions. Makes for no surprises later from your cabinet members. Its not a prerequisite to not getting the job, but if caught later, you could be fired for it. Thats the way it should be.

Posted by: Deborah | November 13, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Its about time. Every president elect should ask these questions. Makes for no surprises later from your cabinet members. Its not a prerequisite to not getting the job, but if caught later, you could be fired for it. Thats the way it should be.
—————————
Deborah ,
Everyone Bow!!!! The great Obama has finally brought brought the 63 questions down from the mountain!!!!!
LOL….are you libs really this nieve and dumb?

Posted by: Mike_C | November 13, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Although Senator Obama meets the basic qualifications required by the US Constitution (35 YOA + US born citizen)
to become President of the USA, he would not be able to obtain clerance
to serve in his own Secret Service detail. In all probability, his past
associations/activities would prevent
him from passing the required background
check, even to mow the White House lawn.

Posted by: CHS235 | November 13, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

funny even BO couldnt pass his own test hes gonna have trouble finding folks, oh wait no he wont because really none of this crap matters to the hupocritical democrats

Posted by: joe daddy | November 13, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I happen to think this is quite reasonable. Any person on this board that claims they find this objectionable would probably be the first person to complain if someone was hired by the team and then later was found out to have had pictures of themselves or family members with questionable pictures on any type of website…….If you don’t have anything to hide, you shouldn’t have a problem filling out the application.

Posted by: sawyersmother | November 13, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Mike_C
Are you saying Obama should NOT be asking questions ahead of time? Of course this won’t find every problem, but it seems logical to be as thorough as possible up front.

Posted by: jock59801 | November 13, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Wow, this is one paranoid President-Elect!

Posted by: Notthatgullible | November 13, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

No he’s not paranoid. He just wants to make sure that whom ever is appointed is not stupid. that what smart people do when they are looking for employees, assistanta, cabinet members etc. Tt’s real basic

Posted by: citygal | November 13, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

“Yukon,
since you seem to have a good handle on this, why dont you provide us with the names of these specialists and who they work for.”
Here are a few of the security experts who have publically stated that Obama would have no particular difficulty getting a clearance sufficient to work for the Secret Service:
Mark Zaid, Washington attorney specializing in security-clearance work
Elizabeth Newman, of the law firm Kalijarvi, Chuzi & Newman, also specializing in security clearances
Mark Riley, security clearance lawyer, US Army intelligence (ret.)
Now, who exactly is the source of the contention that Obama would have any difficulty obtaining a clearance? Other than those people who think he would be automatically disqualified on the grounds of being the Antichrist?
A bit of digging reveals that it’s simply an anonymous internet rumor, probably started by some individual whose sole qualification is that his foil hat protects him from the government mind-control rays.

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Those of you that are so negative, lets be true folks, the bottom line has to do with him being bi-racial, if he didn’t have a ounce of African blood in him, nothing would be said. If the McCain/Palin group did this, then their supporters would be singing their praise. All this hoopla, is all about race/nationality, nothing more nothing less, simple as that. Less call the spade what it really is Black, get a grip folks, lighten up and relax. Obama can only do so much. Someone mention him getting us into a useless war, making us unsafe, doesn’t that already exist, oh yeah that is ok because it is the current Administration….who is not Black so its ok. Guess I better not apply for a job, if I do please remind me to list this message.

Posted by: Andi | November 13, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Obama can’t pass a security clearance to become his own security guard? Clearly this man is a threat to himself! CODE RED CODE RED!

Posted by: smarzeli | November 13, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

WHAT A FRIGGIN’ HYPOCRITE! COULDN’T PASS HIS OWN APPLICATION! WAKE UP PEOPLE, THIS GUY IS GOING TO BE CALLED “PRESIDENT” BY HALF THE COUNTRY SOON!

Posted by: Laura | November 13, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

What right does he have to ask if an applicant or a member of his family owns a gun? According to the United States Supreme Court that is a Constitutional right.
Do you have to give up your Constitutional rights to work for the President of the United States? Is he going to tell the rest of us to give up our rights too?
Just asking.

Posted by: Oonogil | November 13, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I believe all modern Presidents have done this to some extent, none of them want to be embarrassed later on…….. ABC and the rest of the Media is just trying to make a big deal about BO doing it to make him seem godly…..…………… only problem is…. humans forget… humans lie, humans lie to get jobs…. will something get by them…lets hope soooooo… its will be a bigger story since he is making a big deal about vetting them….. hehehehhe

Posted by: MediaTalkingPoints | November 13, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Too bad no one asked any of these questions of Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 13, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

OBAMA IS GOING TO BE THE BEST PRESIDENT THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER HAD, OR WILL EVER HAVE.
REPUBLICANS, JUST GET USED TO IT. LET IT HAPPEN…IT WILL BE EASIER ON YOU IN THE LONG RUN…

Posted by: Akili | November 13, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“HA! This from a man who won’t even show his real birth certificate?”
You do realize that less than a minute in the search engine of your choice will take you straight to Obama’s real birth certificate posted online, don’t you?

Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 13, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Sure would be nice if Obama would answer these questions. It would be nice to know who has been elected President. This guy wants to know every scrap of information about the people working for him. But I guess the fact that he should also be known to the people he works for, if you forgot, that would be all American citizens, not just Democrats, is something he should not have to be troubled with. He is the messiah after all.
What a joke.

Posted by: JoJo | November 13, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Darn shame we couldn’t get this information on our president-elect. I think he and Joe should fill one out!

Posted by: akgr | November 13, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Yukon Sam, most of these post are from the same person just restating lies after lie. They will not look it up or give the web site they supposedly found this information on. Remember they are following in Cheney’s foot steps. Cheney started the rumor that McCain had a Bi-Racial daughter out of wedlock.
It is called Spin, Lie, deceit and then repeat twice. SHOW US THE PROOF if you have the guts.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

When people say others are stupid because they are uninformed, I will disagree. Here we have people who read the news yet are complete idiots.
So people are stupid, even those who read the news.

Posted by: Jaques | November 13, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

As the article says, this is the question list for potential “top-ranking” officials. They’ll all get background checks anyway, so this just gives the applicants an opportunity to air their closets themselves before the vetting team (or the media) go looking for skeletons.

Posted by: common sense is an oxymoron | November 13, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

I could barely make it halfway through these comments without becoming sick with the repetitiveness of each passing box. But let me throw my two cents in:
These questions are not to discount a person from any position in Obama’s cabinet, only to know the backgrounds of the applicants and avoid prospective embarrassment at a later date. In regards to gun ownership; this would not block any person from a cabinet position either as it is a right to own and possess weapons – only to better know the applicants (Maybe he’s looking for hunting partners as well, haha)
Also consider that the information gathered here could be used to form a preemptive defense against slander. Inquiring of past mistakes is not intrusive, it is smart politics; I would much prefer any political figure embrace his or her mistakes and show that they have learned from them than leave them shrouded in mystery and subject to political spin when they are exposed to the general public.
*I’m not above offensive humor

Posted by: H. Warbis | November 13, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Humans lie.
If they’re really serious everyone will answer the questionnaire then take a lifestyle polygraph.
Any bets on this?

Posted by: Cynical | November 13, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

My appologies CHS235.. I suppose that was meant to be directed toward Mike_C

Posted by: H. Warbis | November 13, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I am vehemently against the policies that President-elect Obama has supported as an IL and US Senator. I’ve even been published already by my local paper where I refer to Obama as a “Marxist” for his support of “Spreading (Redistributing) the Wealth”. All that said, I refuse to engage in personal attacks against this man which are out of line. I refuse the notion that he is half the country’s President or only 52% of the voters and I will pray for him to succeed. Like it or not, he won and I the last thing I want to do is be as disrespectful towards Bush and to adopt an unpatriotic position of wishing him failure such as was demonstrated by the American Left for the past eight years. Every good Christian patriot should pray for their political leaders and it’s time that conservatives start selling conservative values versus attempting to destroy the opponent’s character.

Posted by: Joe in OK | November 13, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Joe in OK what if everyone payed the same percentage of tax? would you be for that?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Anthony Question for you Joe, how do you feel about American POW’s being tortured?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Should have been another

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 13, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Obviously, none of you crazy posters need apply. Who do you think Obama is going to choose for his administration – incompetent sycophants like Bush did? Sorry to disappoint you, but he won’t be giving P Diddy or Ludacrous a job as you all expected he might. You still think the guy is stupid after what he has accomplished? You just wish!! Sorry to disappoint you.

Posted by: geecee | November 13, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I don’t care what any of you sore-losers say. Barack Obama will be our new president come Jan. 20 and you will either have to deal with it or just be plain miserable.
I don’t care what lies you spew because I know they are not true- with most of you it’s like tea pot calling the kettle black; you’re so hypocritical. President-Elect Obama seeks transparency and so far he has done a good job of being so. I feel what he is trying to do is honorable so who am I to criticize him, especially when he has done nothing wrong? So I will let him choose his cabinet members in silence. I will give him the chance to lead- after all Bush had 8 years. I will be patient because all of us who believe in wisdom still understand that patience is an everlasting virtue. I will not be hasty and I will continue to do whatever I can to be an asset to my country. I will have faith, but I will not put it in man. I will put it in God, to at least allow us as a nation (and global community) this time of peace and prosperity, and to also allow Obama to become the leader we, who have supported him, long for him to be- those who have supported him believes he is and wants to be as a person, father, husband, son, grandson, and leader- an honest man who keeps his word. I know it’s rare, but it’s not impossible to find. I just believe Obama will prove all the nay-sayers wrong, come the end of his term. Now, that’s putting it honestly.
People, give the man a chance.

Posted by: matteroffacts | November 13, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Harry,
Please learn how to capitalize “American” and “Republican Party.”

Posted by: Elaine | November 13, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Obama is a liar and this countries #1 security risk… He wouldn’t pass a background check to mow the white house lawn with his connections to criminals and Communists… and you idiot democrats elected him. A complete slime-ball.
This nut and his thug advisors want to weed out any opposition to his agenda, ideology, and ambitions by way of extreme intrusion into an applicant’s personal affairs. A true Totalitarian and Marxist who has much disdain for our Constitution and its checks and balances. He already has admitted he will appoint liberal judges to as many circuit court positions as he can as well as the Supreme Court so he can circumvent the Constitution and the responsibility of legislatures by legislating from the bench. With activist judges deciding law we no longer need our Constitution because the law is then reduced to what ever the judge says it is no matter how bizarre or erroneous the decision. As long as those decisions gut our Constitution, rendering it worthless so his Marxist agenda is shoved down our throats until our country suffocates under the weight of socialism.
God save our Constitution.

Posted by: Bellagio | November 13, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Wuzzup with the censor thing?

Posted by: Hardlabour | November 13, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

President Obama had better look long and hard at everybody he hires. If the chamber maid’s second cousin’s nephew in law steals a candy bar, Sarah Palin and the madmen and madwomen who support her will accuse President Obama of running a candy theft ring.

Posted by: Hardlabour | November 13, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Of course, only the most meticulous people who categorize everything they do in a computer file that’s backed up on three different drives will be able to truthfully account for everything the application asks for. Raise your hands, how many people write down what gift over 50 dollars they receive and who gave it to them. Remember, you have to go from now all the way back to your earliest memory. your parents should be able to supply the info from before that.

Posted by: wilder | November 13, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

matteroffacts, staying in silence is what leads to problems. Speak now, because I bet that you would complain about the questionare if it was Dubya who asked his people to fill it out.
Many showed the same trust in Dubya that you now show in Obama.
I would also point out that there is such a thing as over transparent. Do we really need to know if someone’s High School student got a parking ticket?
Obama will get the same chance that it seems every president since Nixon received: the people will second guess his every move, every action, every thought. Some will agree with him, some will disagree. This is not a bad thing. It helps make sure that our politician are doing what they need to be.
Regardless, 4 years later, we will start the cycle all over again. Another fight that seems destined for bloodshed as people wish to silence those who speak against their candidate, be they Republican or Democrat.
Don’t you just love the insanity?

Posted by: Durandal | November 13, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

It’s a pretty standard form, as these things go. The only problem with questionnaires like this is of course that honest people who truthfully answered “yes” on a few of the more innocent points are automatically disqualified, while liars just check the “no” box every time and so get pretty much any job they want. Ah, the joy of “are you now or have you ever been” style forms…

Posted by: Rotundo | November 13, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“Could you pass Obama background check?”
Duh, how about telling me what a passing grade is for this?

Posted by: Fuffler | November 13, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Can you imagine the lawsuits if a private employer used that as a job application?

Posted by: Sarah_R | November 13, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

TRUST is the only path to acceptance.
obama has to earn this. The fact he has been elected does not mean automatic US
acceptance. Just like the feelings of the democratic party about Bush. Bush had the public trust and apparently lost it. obama has, in large part, to
gain trust. No one has got to get used to him being president, no more than we had to get used to Bush being president.
Getting hold of anything is much different than holding on. He will be tasked with holding on for the first two years, not begining his reign.

Posted by: JJ | November 13, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Ironic, isn’t it?? Obama wouldn’t hire himself!!!

Posted by: Mark | November 13, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I think Obama’s a rational person. He’s probably NOT looking for the man or woman who can answer these questions honestly and still come out untarnished.
I think the point is for the applicant to expose his or her “known” flaws and allow the selection team to decide the amount of risk the applicant brings to the table. They can prepare to handle “known” risks; it’s the surprises that will be the most costly.

Posted by: Betcha | November 13, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Obama has been elected by the people of USA as their future president. He has not officially taken up the post yet so let him have some time in the job before rushing in with criticism.Just bear in mind he has been elected by the majority of the of the electorate and therefore deserves respect. Give him some time so as we can see what he CAN do.

Posted by: Alexander | November 13, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Anyone who thinks that what the Obama administration is doing is excessive is showing their own ignorance and peasantry.
In industries like law, banking, military/govt contracting, or anything sensitive, this is the norm. They don’t care if you smoked pot in college, they care about you being honest enough to admit it. People in sensitive positions who lie about their past are more likely to lie about other things as well, and that’s a risk to any employer – especially one as high-profile as the President.
Of course, people who have never worked anything more than a burger shop cash register wouldn’t realize this, but the rest of us who actually have gainful employment have completed/will complete a check like this at some point in the career.

Posted by: Hara | November 13, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Thanks to the NYTimes, we now have an idea of the criteria by which President-Elect Obama will judge applicants for posts in his Administration. Just for fun we took a stab at how he might answer…

Posted by: RedHank | November 13, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

I doubt it if Obama could pass his resume. With Obamas past record and accociations he probably would not be able to get a job with the Govt. But Look at all the people who voted for Bush, even twice. Bush and Obama are slick talkers, I didn’t fall for any of it. When people talk slick, theres usually a trick, with their agendas.

Posted by: Georgie | November 13, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Free speech should not be censered ABC. You will regret your support of cover ups someday.

Posted by: Georgie | November 13, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Hey – Obama is just trying to cover his bases. Imagine if you were hired and some nutjob goes on a reality show and spills the beans about you about your torrid past of when you use to consume alcohol when you were in high school!

Posted by: Emily Johsnon | November 13, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Sounds Like an application for mindless robots.

Posted by: not stupid | November 13, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

This appears to be a standard set of questions for any position of responsibility. Having held a National Security Clearance of “secret” for seven (7) years these type of questions are “trivial” compared to the National Security application. MY QUESTION I HAVE NEVER SEEN OBAMA ANSWER ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS DURING HIS CAMPAIGN. FUTHER MORE OBAMA COULD NOT EVEN GET A NATIONAL SECURITY CLEARANCE BECAUSE OF HIS PAST (AND CURRENT) ASSOCIATES!

Posted by: carlton | November 13, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Osama himself can’t fill this out. He can’t get a Clearance NOW. God help us we are screwed.

Posted by: Bill | November 14, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Since the USA is designed so that you violate myriad and multiple laws while you are awake, NOBODY can fill out this survey truthfully and be hired. Here’s hoping the whole stinking festering mess collapses under Obama and he gets the blame. Jesus H. Christ I hate what AmeriDUH has become.

Posted by: Hugh | November 14, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

If you CAN’T pass the test, congratulations. YOU ARE AN AMERICAN. THE GOVERNMENT IS THE ENEMY. TIME TO END THE FBI, SECRET SERVICE, CIA, ETC.

Posted by: yuri | November 14, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

BO couldn’t pass the muster on this test. He’d have to tell about all his terrorist friends.

Posted by: cacti jack | November 14, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

‘W’s brother involved in savings and loan scandasl..
‘W’s track record not stellar:
* Arbusto, an oil exploration company, lost money, but it got considerable investments (nearly $5 million) because even losing oil investments were useful as tax shelters.
* Spectrum 7 Energy Corp. bought out Arbusto in 1984 and hired Mr. Bush to run the company’s oil interests in Midland, Texas. The oil business collapsed as oil prices plummeted by 1986, and Spectrum 7 Energy was near failure.
* Harken Energy acquired Mr. Bush’s Spectrum 7 Energy shares, and he got Harken shares, a directorship, and a consulting arrangement in return. Harken, under Bush, brought in Saudi real estate tycoon Sheikh Abdullah Bakhsh as a board member and a major investor. Over the next few years, Harken would turn out to have links to: Saudi money, CIA-connected Filipinos, the Harvard Endowment, the emir of Bahrain, and the shadowy Bank of Credit and Commerce International.
o A 1991 internal SEC document suggested George W. Bush violated federal securities law at least 4 times in the late 1980s and early 1990s in selling Harken stock while serving as a director of Harken. This is essentially the same kind of activity that Martha Stewart is going to prison over. Except at the time of the investigation, Mr. Bush’s father was president and the case was quietly dropped.

Posted by: XXX | November 14, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

And Obama will not produce any of his own records but, applicants have to? What a bunch of BS…Obama is a fraud and liar.
Obama..NOT my president…NOT now…NOT ever!

Posted by: Sam Deakins | November 14, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

Talking about honesty
Let’s ask Obama to fill out the application
After all he was hired by the people to serve the people

Posted by: Mica | November 14, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am

Obama would be excluded from the list of applicants automatically because of his aunt who is illegally in the country.

Posted by: PJ | November 14, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

About as intrusive as a secret clearance. Right wingers are definitely over-reacting. Obama will make a fine president because he is not interested in looting the treasury as Bush/Cheney have done…

Posted by: Carlos | November 14, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

The long and short of it is NO he could not have a Security Clearance as he has admitted to using drugs and been friends with noted terrorists.
This would disqualify him from a clearance just like Clinton could not have one either.
And yes I could be called “bitter” and cling to my religion and guns.
I do not like the man because of his views nor his party because of theirs.
For those who call the present Pres a baby killer I suggest you look at your own party first. How many more will you put to death?

Posted by: Infantry Soldier | November 14, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

I would like to see Obama’s and Biden’s
answers to the questions. After all THEY work for the American people.

Posted by: carmen | November 14, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Either Infant. Sol. has not had a clearance in awhile or he is attempting to deceive. SBI might have those stipulations, but a secret clearance would not.
Bush jr. has associated with members of Osama Bin Laden’s family and Cheney has actively dealt with Iran AFTER the first Gulf war.

Posted by: Carlos | November 14, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Why should he impose a background check like this? What gives him the right. Nobody did a real background check on him. Look at all the evidence that presented itself in the face of the American people nationwide and nobody did anything about the hatred and bigotry he sat under for 20 years, the shady characters he associated with, and even some who support terrorism. What about that Mr Obama? We’re not even sure if you’re a natural born American. If he isn’t, which is still not sure, he doesn’t even qualify to run for office.

Posted by: danito | November 14, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

It appears that Obama couldn’t get a job in his own administration. Admitted cocain use, long standing membership in a racist church, political associationships with admitted terrorists, communists and marxists, sweetheart real estate deal with a convicted felon, refusal to produce college transcripts, refusal to produce articles and college thesis authored by him, association with candidate for Kenyan presidency, and on and on. He should fire himself immediately.

Posted by: DonMac2 | November 14, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Barack Obama couldn’t get a security clearance if he were to apply for one, now he’s the president and asking questions like these? It will be a miracle if we all aren’t standing in the soup lines in 4 years.

Posted by: terro | November 14, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

The ONLY good thing about Barack Hussein Obama being elected is that after four years (probably less), this country’s tragic experiment in left-wing tyranny will be over and done.

Posted by: JamC | November 14, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

What a hypocrite.
Yes BO is my president–not “The One” I hoped for.
I hope he protects our country as well as Bush did, and doesn’t destroy our economy.
But somewhere down the road Karma will catch up to this guy, his terrorist friend Ayers and all the others that lied to protect him.

Posted by: bailey | November 14, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

BO couldn’t pass the security clearance to be his own bodyguard.

Posted by: dave | November 14, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Sorry, I have never received payola from a real estate developer, nor have I consorted with or been inspired by communists or domestic terrorists. To top it all off, I had a top secret security clearance as a soldier. There hasn’t been a traffic ticket issued for less than $50 since about 1975, but alas, I have two. Bugger me! I guess I can’t work in the new administration.

Posted by: Woody | November 14, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Having held a “Secret”,”Top Secret” as well as SCI clearance for many years and having gone through the process of obtaining the above mentioned clearances – I can tell you that our president to be could not obtain the clearance required to view some of our country’s secrets. How can he lead those very organizations who would deny him clearance and access?

Posted by: JimJ | November 14, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

It’s just my opinion – but, whether I voted for Obama or not, I have to support the office of the President. I may disagree with things that are done, but I also have the right to say so. This is our country and we have to unite and try to bring her back. No, I didn’t vote for Obama, nor would I ace the questions listed above, but as an American, I must honor this high office and pray for our leaders. This is our country – Start thinking about our country instead of whether your “team” won or not, because that part is over for now. Let’s get together and turn this thing around. Write Washington with your concerns, be respectful, keep informed and check that the information you find is factual. It’s time to “Change” the way we treat each other. We are all in this together. “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” (Lincoln) – Just My Opinion

Posted by: JustMyOpinion | November 14, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Bush wrecked the economy, put the United States on the world’s most hated list, and had a cabinet of incompetent fools. I find it interesting and amusing that so many people object to higher standards of questioning for future cabinet members. It should reassure us that the President-Elect actually cares about placing people of higher ethics and standards in cabinet positions. Security clearance has little or nothing to do with it.

Posted by: Allison | November 14, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Sounds like alot of cranky Republicans on here.
Let’s hope Obama can pull us out of the “Bush Recession”.

Posted by: Reason | November 14, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

To American50, that seems very fair to me. Exactly what I would have done. Obama is going to kill free enterprise and destroy the American Spirit.
One more comment: I’ve never seen such lousy spellers and grammer usage in all of my life. I would suspect that these are the people that elected that idiot — excuse me, the “Chosen One”. Give me a break. This Country is in for trouble with that fool at the helm.

Posted by: I'mAnAmerican | November 14, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I think what all of you fail to realize is that this is GOVERNMENT doing the questionaire, not President-Elect Obama. Regardless if he could or could not pass the test, he has been elected to our nations highest office by the AMERICAN PEOPLE, not just democrats. Understand this….we all have a part in this, and if you think you would not pass the test, dont apply for a job. I for one would love to take part in the new administration, however I would not pass the test….I am honest about it, but that doesnt make me, or even Mr Obama a bad person….it makes us human…

Posted by: Bill in Bmore | November 14, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

George Bush did not destroy the economy by himself. He did it with the help of the likes of Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer. Now we’re adding Pelosi and Reid to that awful mix. You Democrats are still mad because Clinton was impeached. And, by the way, he wasn’t impeached because of sex between two consenting adults, he was impeached because he lied about it — going back to the Obama employment questionnaire.

Posted by: I'mAnAmerican | November 14, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

To all those thinking that Obama won’t be able to get the clearances needed to get a clearance: You are aware that Bush jr. had three arrests and a history of alcohol abuse?
Quit pretending that you are worried about a non-issue…

Posted by: Carlos | November 14, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

yes, i did fill out a job application just like this one…twice.
Once, to become a student assistant at the Department of justice and once again to become a student admin at a college.
To work for these types of positions you need to have a full FBI background check thanks to the patriot act.
These background checks are outsourced to companies who make these questinaires. You fill them out, then they interview everybody and check to see if you told the truth or omitted anything.
Its not that hard to do and it’s really not that big of a deal.

Posted by: Brittany | November 14, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Mr. Bill in Bmore:
You mentioned bad spelling and grammar in the posts. Well, first, I must point out that you misspelled grammar.
In addition, punctuation always goes on the inside of the quote marks in the U.S., e.g. “Bill in BMore should not talk smack about other people’s grammar and spelling.”
If you are in Europe, feel free to put the punctuation on the outside of the quote marks. You can also spell color like this… colour

Posted by: Grammar Nazi | November 14, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Hi, I applied for and got a senior level federal position in the 1990s. I was required to provide three copies of my college transcripts as well as copies of every article I had ever written. I was also required to report all previous addresses back to my birth in the 1940s. I had to provide personal and professional references and information permitting a full civil and criminal background check. Since I owned some $80 in stock in a company which my agency would regulate, I was required to sell that. It is difficult and costly to sell such a small quantity of stock but I did so. Former teachers were interviewed as well as former neighbors. Once cleared, I was informed that I had a low level security clearance and a civilian rank equivalent to Colonel in the Army.
It took a great deal of time to complete and I had to search for old articles as I had written a great deal in the days before the Internet. I was finally able to obtain full hard copy of every one of the 138 articles I had published. I won’t say it was easy to do. On 9/11, it proved valuable as my superiors were absent at meetings and for a week or so I was in charge of a portion of a major agency.
Though I didn’t vote for Obama, I welcome his care in vetting people. I had done background checks when I was a manager in industry, especially for key positions and found several impostors. That saved me probably a great deal of trouble. Management is difficult enough without adding the complication of having unknown quantities in one’s organization.
As far as the President-Elect is concerned, I am also concerned about the lack of hard information about this man. I certainly would not hire him on the basis of what has been reported in the press and on the blogs.
Unlike my government colleagues who said in 2000 that Mr. Bush would never be “their president” and they would do everything they could to undermine him, I take the position that once he is inaugurated, we as civil servants have the responsibility to carry out any lawful order. The president is the president, regardless of party. My loyalty is to the United States and its Constitution which I once took an oath to uphold and defend. Though released from the service, I was never released from that oath.

Posted by: Matthew C | November 14, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Doesn’t bother me at all. I’m more concerned about who gets the phone calls in the first place.

Posted by: Dan | November 14, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Anyone else notice the name “Clinton” hand written next to question #31?
HA!

Posted by: Jim | November 14, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

There is a reason why people with certain connections and/or behavior are excluded from sensitive positions. One of these is blackmail.
Obama has a number of people who can threaten him with going public with facts and information about him if he does not do as they wish.
This may be a very troubled administration.

Posted by: Anon | November 14, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Well all I have to say is that Obama is talking with Jennifer Granholm the Gov. of Michigan. Let me all just tell ya, she is the reason Michigan Economy has failed so much. She was suppose to balance our budget instead she made us go further in the hole. It is scary to think she is actually going to possibly have a position on this transition team. We NEED TO BE PRAYING!!!!!! Pray that God will forgive those who voted for Obama and that he would pour out His grace upon us (the American People).. and while I am at it. Thank you to all of our Soldiers.

Posted by: Migirl | November 14, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Republicans would rather preach hate and fear instead of getting this country moving in the right Direction. How is this for Bible thumping people. How can you claim to live by the word of god when you don’t?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | November 14, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Obama couldn’t pass it, that’s for sure.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | November 14, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” -Patrick Henry

Posted by: Live Free Or Die | November 14, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” -Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Dont Tread On Me | November 14, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!” -Samuel Adams

Posted by: Spirit of '76 | November 14, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” -Patrick Henry

Posted by: Liberty Or Death | November 14, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

This discussion is about a QUESTIONNAIRE — not a pass/fail test. Without seeing all of it I can only be happy that this man wants to know what’s in the can he’s buying. I’ve heard nothing indicating a “wrong” answer disqualifies a person for a position. In law what Obama is doing is called “due diligence”

Posted by: Christine Russo | November 14, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

“Of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people, commencing demagogues and ending tyrants.” -Alexander Hamilton

Posted by: One If By Land... | November 14, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

While he’s at it, why doesn’t Obama include a question that says if anyone has had a thought that leans at all to the right, or has any objection to going against my campaign promises at the expense of the American public, please check yes and explain. Obama and his leftist cabinet are going to bring about change to this country!!!

Posted by: Jeff | November 14, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

All the hate on here is hilarious. Someone actually called Obama a fool. Funny, if Obama is a fool then Bush Sr. and Jr. are what… way worse than a fool.
It is also funny how many of the lies that were told during the election are still being thrown around. Someone went old school and but Barack Hussein Obama. Yeah that one never gets old. Terrorist, socialist, racist church, marxist wow, I have to admit you repubs sure stick to your guns even when proven wrong and defeated.
Well at least you know how many of us have felt during the past 8 years, sucks doesn’t it. The fake fear thing is a nice touch, unfortunately I haven’t felt safe in 8 years so welcome to the club.
Why are people saying that they do not know anything about Obama? Is it because everything you thought about him has been proven false or that the lies didn’t become everyone’s truth.
I have to say on Nov 4th and 5th I have never seen so many happy faces and not just on black people but every race, gender and nationality. The world has come together and Obama haters are mad? I know unity and joy are foreign to you haters but get over it.
For the moron that asked God to forgive Obama voters you are the funniest because God supports humanity and peace, and unity and community organizing and clearly you don’t so I will pray that he takes the hate from your heart and all those like you.

Posted by: Ashley | November 14, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

What a joke! This guy could not even be his own bodyguard with this application. He could not apply for any state or federal public service job. This guy is the President? Only in America. Wonderful, comrades.

Posted by: Antinov | November 14, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

It’s a good idea? Are you people kidding me? Granted, I’ll give you that it’s a good idea, in theory, then again, so is fascism. The key point you’re missing is that we’ve not only elected to the most powerful office in the free world a person who couldn’t pass the security clearance for a federal job, thus making such clearances moot, but a person who couldn’t even work in his own administration, thus making this highly invasive screening moot. Good idea indeed.

Posted by: Ohms | November 15, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

You have to love the chutzpah of a man asking these questions of potential employees; questions that he himself would have a very difficult time answering honestly and then getting hired by his own team. Amazing.

Posted by: Mike in San Antonio | November 17, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Ashley…
Does God condone Obama’s position to murder unborn children? Does God support Obama’s position for homosexuals to be openly recognized and allowed to marry? Do you recall that our Creator openly destroyed people for such behavior? Would Jesus have sat in the church of Jeremiah Wright? Unless the reference to God is actually a god that Barack worships, and not the God of the Bible…

Posted by: Jason | November 17, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

I am surprised that they don’t ask people what their confessions were and what they talked about with their doctors. This is way too intrusive.
Imagine the potential for abuse with so much information. This is going to encourage dishonest responses. I doubt most people with a clean history would even want their privacy invaded this much.
Who wants to tell their prospective employer about an embarrassing fight with an ex or sibling over the Internet? They would even want to know about love notes and rowdy smack during sports season. lol

Posted by: whoa | November 17, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

oh geez. Welcome to the new leftist illuminati. We might have seen different people involved from the beginning if this was always required and used as a screening process

Posted by: EW | November 20, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

I need a job today 6-18-10

Posted by: Saif murshed | June 18, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.