Loose Ends: Joe the Plumber’s Records-Searcher Punished
The Columbus Dispatch reports that "Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Department of Job and Family Services, will be placed on unpaid leave for one month in response to an inspector general’s investigation. The investigation found Jones-Kelley had no legitimate reasons to check on Toledo-area resident Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher, who was popularized as ‘Joe the Plumber’ by Republican presidential candidate John McCain. It also confirmed she improperly used her state e-mail account to raise campaign money for President-elect Barack Obama.
"’Now, she’s made a bad judgment and I’ve acknowledged that,’" said Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland. "’But I do not believe that a lifetime of honorable public service can be just discounted in the face of what has happened.’ The report by Inspector General Thomas P. Charles found that Jones-Kelley ‘had no legitimate agency function or purpose’ in authorizing the checks. It said the reasons Jones-Kelley offered for the checks in child-support, public assistance and unemployment tax databases ‘were not credible.’"
– jpt

Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
What she did was wrong and should be punished.
But the news media has a resposibility to probe the background of the Joe’s who pretend that they are something they are not for political gain. ie. in a position to be a business owner who makes over $250,000/year when he has several liens against him for non payment of taxes and hospital bills.
Posted by: mj | November 21, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
she should be fired. this was all wrong.
when so called good long term public servants do this kind of stuff, it only makes you wonder what have they gotten away with in the past?
Posted by: My goodness | November 21, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Let’s put a marker down and see how a member of a different party prying into and releasing personal information on a Democrat fares.
And lying about it too.
Isn’t that what someone once said- the cover-up was worse than the crime?
What about that?
Posted by: drjohn | November 21, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“But the news media has a resposibility to probe the background of the Joe’s who pretend that they are something they are not for political gain. ie. in a position to be a business owner who makes over $250,000/year when he has several liens against him for non payment of taxes and hospital bills.”
So you think anyone who Obama approaches should have his or her personal life destroyed?
Nice.
Posted by: drjohn | November 21, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Democrats all the way. Very nice If the roles had been switched we all know what would have happened… Country is rolling towards the end. Way to go Strickland !! U democratic goof!!
Posted by: jj | November 21, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Now more reporting on how Bill Ayers wrote Dreams of my father, using the same dumb analogies (NYC East River, and boys sitting on water buffalo) as the Ayers’ book Fugitive Days. Also the dozen or more nautical analogies all belong to Ayers who served on a merchant ship in the 60s.
Posted by: Colonel Reb | November 21, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
She should be fired. Let the lawsuits begin.
Posted by: ed_bernays | November 21, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
It is always tempting to use government resources to learn the truth. It is always tempting to tell the truth when you discover it. Obviously, it is wrong to do either one, these days. “Joe the Plumber” was a fraud, to some extent, and is being paid well for his “services” to the McCain campaign. We celebrate him, instead of the truth, in the media. No wonder no one watches the nightly news on TV anymore. I think Helen deserves a promotion, not a suspension.
Posted by: frj | November 21, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Joe the Who? Oh, you mean that tax evading welfare using hospital bill-ducking unlicensed plumber? Yawn. I’m glad the GOP still cares so much about their greatest role model.
Posted by: Rbyanes | November 21, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
She should be fired. Then Joe the Plumber should sue her.
mj,
It would have been nice if the news media had put a quarter as much effort into probing the background of Barack Obama, the actual candidate, as they did in destroying the life of a bystander who, when approached by the candidate, asked him a question. That the candidate got himself into political trouble with his answer is not the fault of, or the responsibility of, the citizen who asked it.
Posted by: Keith | November 21, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
“But the news media has a resposibility to probe the background of the Joe’s who pretend that they are something they are not for political gain. ie. in a position to be a business owner who makes over $250,000/year when he has several liens against him for non payment of taxes and hospital bills.”
So you think anyone who Obama approaches should have his or her personal life destroyed?
Nice.
———————————
Don’t be silly neocon. Obama didn’t do any of this to this man. John McCain did. Joe the plumber was voting republican from the start and got famous because he caught Obama in a Gaffe.
That’s it.
Now he has an agent and the whole 9 yards. He had a choice after the debates. He could’ve told everyone he was voting for McCain or that he was just trying to make a point but thats not what he did. He turned himself into a figure head for a McCain campaign, even doing rallies for him.
So let’s break it down so you can’t point the finger.
Joe makes Obama Gaffe>McCain makes Joe Famous> Joe chooses public spot light> Joe gets the scrutiny public figures face.
But this is all the democrats fault right?
Posted by: Ashton | November 21, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
drjohn: Have you seen the evidence you are spouting? Personally held them in your hands? Hi is allowwed to ask any question he likes with no explanation to anyone for any reason. You wouldn’t want that to be taken away from you but yet you want to take it away from someone else. How many times have you pretended to be smart, someone you aren’t or asked any question without someone attackimng you? Many times I am sure. He does not need a license to work as a plumber as long as he works for a master plumber with a license. Get over yourself. The only one who is impressed with you is..well…YOU!!!
Posted by: Cathy | November 21, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
She should be fired, and prosecuted.
Posted by: seah | November 21, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Joe was on Fox new saying that he planned to sue the State of Ohio. This man is going to stretch his 15 minutes. I wish he would go away…..Its not like she used the information against him. McCain/Palin was the one who keeps bringing the man’s name up. Obama has moved on and so should we…
Posted by: Ages | November 21, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Hey MJ, it is none of your business or anyonelse’s business. Any citizen can ask a legitimate question to our public servents, and by the way that is exactly who they are suppose to be – Obama did not face the same scrutiny as he should have and further more you need to look up the records of our senators you would be shocked at what their personal lives hold. Check them out they are held accountable to public scrutiny not, private citizens.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 21, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
This is whistle-blowing. Helen’s mistake was doing the digging herself, and by soliciting campaign donations to the Obama campaign on company time using company resouces. She could have protected herself by leaking to the media and let them do the digging into public records which, by their very nature, are in the public domain, and by campaigning for Obama on her own time and on her own phone, computer, etc.
Posted by: nanameow | November 21, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Certainly a penalty such as a temporary suspension is correct for improper searching and publication of personal information in government files. This is not by any means a correct punishment for lying to investigators and thereby obstructing justice. The reasons she offered for her politically inspired witchhunt were “not credible.” People make mistakes in the heat of a political campaign, and that’s unfortunate. But the justice system can’t just look the other way when the lapse occurs in favor of Democrats.
Posted by: Chris | November 21, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
For those who are patting her on the back….get a clue. Any citizen of country who claims to follow the rule of law shouldn’t tolerate government officials using their connections to further their candidates goals. I say this as an Obama supporter who looks forward to putting a stop to this kind of abuse of power….regardless of the party that the abuse aids. “If the roles had been switched, blah, blah blah.” It doesn’t matter which side did it, it’s still wrong, it still should be stopped. If you really support Obama and his vision for the way government is supposed to be run, you won’t be patting this lady on the back.
Posted by: LowB44 | November 21, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
( YAWN )……
Posted by: aj | November 21, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
The partisan comments above are ridiculus. Both parties especially the GOP under Nixon did exactly what she did.
What we need to be hearing is if anyone does it throw them out. But then Washington would be empty.
Posted by: rs | November 21, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Our government is entrusted with our most critical personal information. That government employee abused her power by accessing someone personal information and then distributing it to the public. She should be fired immediately and hopefully there is a law in the books to charge her with a crime. Bad decision by Ohio Governor not to fire this person. Bring on the lawsuits.
Posted by: jrb | November 21, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I’m sure this is not an isolated case of public abuses the rabid Obama supports were guilty of in their zeal to dispense with anybody who dared to question the word of The Great One.
Posted by: Pioneer Girl | November 21, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I just watched Joe W. on Fox News saying he’s suing the state of Ohio, and wants Jones-Kelley (aka modern-day SS) to be fired, and prosecuted. You go Joe! Hope you don’t find some cement shoes around your socks. These people are downright creepy. I agree with him, and also agree that most Americans today are afraid to speak out (I, admittedly, also lump myself into that category) about this flaunted atrocity. I’m never one to sling mud at geographical areas, but fellas, you can keep Ohio. That place looks all jacked up from here. Nothing has “changed”, other than giving the keys to the Gestapo. Well, you wanted change, hope you enjoy it. First, your guns will go (“these people cling to their guns and religion” ring a bell?) Then, the “Civilian Security Force” will come around to re-indoctrinate you. Yepper, change is a rollin’ like a snowball…just remember, hipsters, and guilty whites. You could only be trying to pardon your guilt for your father’s sins to vote for such a radical liberal- Allen Keys was a great black Presidential candidate a few years back, supporting fair tax, and Dems wouldn’t even look at him. YOU ASKED FOR IT! Being too smart for the room won’t matter soon enough – of course, maybe your kid can be gymnast in the Olympic games, and Pledge allegiance to the ACLU. Thank God I’m old enough to know that many died before me in the fervent belief that Communism was not a form of government to aspire towards. Oh, Joe mentioned they (ACLU) haven’t called him yet, either. So surprising. Go ahead, tell me I’m an ignorant hillbilly, black-helicopter kook. Yep, college-educated, white, broke male veteran. All those things you new-age hippies love to hate. That’s fine, you go ahead and join the rally. I’m sadly resigned to hang out, and watch it all unravel. Change, indeed.
Posted by: Dallas | November 21, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
No, I am not patting her on the back. But I would like to know is why her reasons were found to be “not credible”. WHY NOT?? That IS how people who skip on child support payments get traced. IT ABSOLUTELY IS. Why is he getting special protection from it? This is not a case of his privacy being violated. This is the law being applied by a public agency. So I see some people are immune from the law?
Posted by: Question | November 21, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
She should be fired, or do the honorable thing, and resign. We have voted for change in this country and someone using these kind of unethical tactics doesn’t represent change. Using her state email account to raise money for Obama, and prying into this guy’s background smacks of the Bush-era way of doing things. I’m a Democrat, and I don’t want people with faulty moral compasses being a part of my party’s legacy. I say when this kind of behavior is uncovered, nip it in the bud.
Posted by: cindylou | November 21, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
The media did more vetting of Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher in two weeks than they did of Barack ______ Obama in two years.
Should we be suprised that the results of this investigation are coming out now, after the election? The answer to that question is no. Just like we shouldn’t be suprised when the truth about Obama’s fundraisng comes out, which will probably be after his inauguration if the media can help it.
Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 21, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Gee. Maybe Joe will finally hit the $250,000 bracket and have his taxes restored to Clinton administration levels!
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 21, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Anyone who thinks this sort of thing is new, or restricted to one party, has a damn short memory, or at least a highly selective one. What needs to happen is that BOTH sides need to stop trying so hard to push America to one political extreme or the other, and allow people to live their lives according to their own standards, ideas, and beliefs. After all, THAT is the principle on which this country was founded, not capitalism, socialism, christianity (or any other religion), etc.
Posted by: Rob | November 21, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
She should be punished and thrown to jail for several years! Husein Obama is surely behind all this so he must be impeached immediately.
Sarah Palin / Joe the Plumber 2012!
Posted by: Mom like Sarah | November 21, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Please tell me we are not going to become a “Hitler” type country with the Helen Jones Kelley’s running amuck checking on private citizens.
Posted by: SmartM | November 21, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Let’s not forget that all Joe did was ASK A QUESTION!!!! This whole thing is even worse then when the Clinton Judge and Jury had the two folks arrested (again, in Chicago) years ago when they DARED to yell something out by way protest as the king and queen of chaos went by. All Joe did was ASK A QUESTION. Bambi didn’t even HAVE to answer it. He just accidentally spoke the truth when he did.
For the purposes of supporting our sanity in the dark months ahead, there’s a very important number to keep in mind:
58,343,671 people did NOT vote for Bambi O’Biden. 58,343,671 voted to continue these United States of America as a Constitutional Republic.
Don’t forget on the bad days: there are 58,343,670 people WHO AGREE WITH YOU!!!
He’s gonna implode, folks. The empty suit who has only played roles as a grownup is not going to enjoy this ride. He’s like the stupid dog who accidentally catches the car he was chasing and (think air balloon), “What the hell do I do now?” That’s why you haven’t seen Bambi the last couple of days. He’s off in some room chainsmoking and Rahm Emanuel is slapping him and telling him to get a pair. (Maybe that’s how Hillary’s name came up for SOS)
Posted by: Ann | November 21, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
All such information “revealed” about Joe-the-P should be made readily available to everyone as public record. Many states have “sunshine laws” where all such information is easily availble. If eveything is out in the open all partisan critics could be mollified.
Posted by: who what where | November 21, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
As a Democratic Ohio voter, I will be showing my dismay with my vote. I guess partisanship is alive and well. All hell breaks loose when anything happens that is “perpetrated” by anyone who is a Republican. But a Democrat does it and it is just a monetary lapse of judgment in a long career? Who knows if this is the only lapse of judgment? Because she says so?
Posted by: beebop | November 21, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
So then the illegal wire tappings, torture, lying us into a quagmire in Iraq which has killed 4000 plus soldiers and mamed thousands, destroyed families. That’s OK?
Please, her actions are inexcusable and she should be fired but to make this more than it is is ridiculous. Try looking in the mirror next time you open your mouths.
Posted by: SI | November 21, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
All I can say is, “So what”. So she looked into his file. You may recall that her department didn’t publish the information. All the material that came out on Joe was from other sources, and frankly he invited the scrutiny once he became a major part of McCain’s election message. Anyway, I assure you that we have more to fear from Presidents who refuse to follow the laws of the land (cf. signing statements) than a local department checking on whether someone has paid their child support!
Posted by: Mark | November 21, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
If a political hack had accessed CONFIDENTIAL state government databases on Bill the terrorist, Jeremiah the racist or Tony the slumlord, civil libertarians would be up in arms.
Well, we haven’t heard a peep from them about what happened to Joe the Plumber. What is the ACLU doing about this issue which clearly fits into this “nonpartisan” organization’s mission statement?
Probably they are doing nothing. They are undoubtedly too busy, at this time, preparing papers in favor of restricting free speech via the Fairness Doctrine.
If the ACLU had some noble purposes at one time that is the case no more.
Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 21, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
I am sorry…Helen Jones-Kelley should be terminated. She is in position of responsibility and knows she shouldn’t divulge personal information on file. Oh, so its OK to ruin ones reputation, in the case of Joe Wurzelbacher. Just slap Helen on wrist and say don’t do this again you have a lifetime of honorable public service. Its OK to ruin Joe’s “lifetime of honorable private service and reputation but don’t injure the perpetrator.
Where is your “head” Mr Governor is Helen the type of public servant you want to promote? What else has Helen gotten away with!
Posted by: grandpa john | November 21, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
First of all… Joe the plumber is a liar from the start. He was in debt, late on taxes, not a licensed plumber…what was he going to buy? What bank would have given a guy like him a loan for a business anyway. Maybe a crooked S&L from the 80′s.
He lying when he talked to Obama. He may have dreamed about buying a company, but it wasn’t going to happen in his lifetine. Unless enough of you have kept sending him money. He would have drifted quickly off into oblivion if John Boy and Sexy Sara hadn’t jumped all over him a dragged him out as their new poster boy.
Posted by: Stan Johnson | November 21, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
So then the illegal wire tappings, torture, lying us into a quagmire in Iraq which has killed 4000 plus soldiers and mamed thousands, destroyed families. That’s OK?
——————————
SI, you are total MORON….how about you back up all this garbage with some real facts…examples, REAL examples of these illegal wire tappings, tortures…
Oh by the way….You do actually REMEMBER 9/11 right? AND the fact that there have been ZERO….say it with me liberal fruitcakes…ZERO attacks on American soil since then!
How many lives were meseed up on that day…and in the aftermath of economic upheaval? You libs always seem to have short and selective memories when it suits your cause!
Get grip boy, This is a very dangerous world we live in, unless your ready to face daily bombings and shootings in your own neighborhood, be glad that there are those of us who understand that you need to actually protect this country.
Again, if your your own mentally challenged minds have forgotten, the terrorists that commited the 9/11 attacks were here already in the US. We may never know how many other attacks have been thwarted because the stepped up surveillance, but most sane and intelligent people are quite happy that we have not had a repeat of 9/11.
Torture, … Lets see, I know people that have serve at GITMO… The people there are getting better treatment than most people get here for things that land them in jail. Certainly much better treatment than those various people who have been beheaded by terrorists groups! I suppose you bledding hearts think that if you walked into their cells and kissed their feet, that they would willingly tell you everything they know.
Lying us into Iraq…
Guess what go back and look at Clintons 1998 State of the Union address…You might be surprised at what you find there!
Posted by: Mike_C | November 21, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
This is a head of a dept. Now everyone beneath her has a freebee . She must be held to a higher standard. Thats why we pay her the big bucks , to take responsibilty. Plus she failed to own up to by lying. One month non paid vacation is not enough. There are plenty of honest people looking for work. Makes you wonder if the penalty was firing she may want to talk up about who either requested info or gave info to. Makes ya wonder …..
Posted by: mike fletcher | November 21, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
ALL information housing, employment, license, lawsuit, criminal, credit, insurance, education is availble from legit info providers for a fee. I would suggest that ALL such information should be made available to all. We live in an open society—Secrets only belong in totalitarian societies. Terrorists, Ner-do-wells, child-molesters and crooked officials presently too easily hide behind so-called “confidentiality” and “privacy” laws. ALL info should be free and on open.
Posted by: who what where | November 21, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
ALL information housing, employment, license, lawsuit, criminal, credit, insurance, education is availble from legit info providers for a fee. I would suggest that ALL such information should be made available to all…… ALL info should be free and on open.
Posted by: who what where | Nov 21, 2008 12:12:29 PM
Okay, so then lets see the who, what, where on who what where. Don’t hold out on us.
Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 21, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I think everyone here is missing the point. Whether he is a dem or repub does it matter when someone’s privacy is violated. Ah were is the ACLU, what about if this happen to you would you not want the person who violated your privacy to be punished. Here all I see is partisan bickering and no one even cares about a persons constitutional rights and just on what side he is on???? Has it gotten to hate so much that we can even justify the use of big brother??? Get off you partisan asses and look at the what is really going on. Of the 18 checks run on him only three were requested from the media.
Posted by: Gene | November 21, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
To MY GOODNESS; You would make a bad manager in america you are not guilty just because you THINK someone did something.
In todays age logins and passwords make it very easy for senior managers to check what a person has done while on the system.
You are so wrong. You make the case for people wanting Unions or tenure protected jobs.
Posted by: Ranger Phx | November 21, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
It’s too bad that delusional, shut-ins with grandiose self-important ideations get access to blogs and tv interviews and can exist in this society under false pretenses and then want to burrow in the mud of anonymity to hide after attacking anybody who disagrees with them, claiming “privacy priviledge”.
Yes, I argue that the law should be such that it would make everyone de-cloak (to borrow a Star Trek term) and reveal their true identities and hold everyone accountable and allow everyone the freedom to scrutinize fact from fiction. What a better democracy if everything was in the “sunshine” and all biases and hidden agendas and past crimes, mental infermities and notorieties revealed.
Posted by: who what where | November 21, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Well, the governor certainly sent a strong message. Violate a person’s right to privacy and receive a slap on the wrist.
And sure, it wasn’t politically motivated – an African American donating the max to Barack Obama searches the data base for harmful information.
And the ACLU on all this – out to lunch.
Posted by: Fred C Dobbs | November 21, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Will they throw the guys who tapped into Obamas phone in jail. NO, will they be fired. So far they are getting 2 weeks unpaid leave. This kind of stuff happens to all kinds of people who should know better. But looking at their records and service to the oompanies is also importand to consider. Listen that creep Larry Craig is still in Congress pending out come of appeals and a convicted felon was almost elected in Alaska. Strange things are happening so fast that it makes your head spin. But each case must be judged on its merits.
Posted by: PAT | November 21, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I think the Governor’s decision was very fair and sent a much needed message.
In my state, all personal property records are online for the public and easy to search. Joe’s not paying his personal property taxes would have shown on the state web server for the world to see.
If his ex had file a case for the unpaid child support that information would also be available for the world to see.
I cringe when Obama and others talk about one database for all health care history to make it cheaper for insurance and the medical profession. Working in the computer security area, I know how easy it can be to access the information. There are usually a large numbr of IT staff with access to 100 percent. In addition, the initial cost for one database will be huge and likely to fail from being to complex.
Think how many people in the Bush administration would be on unpaid punishment. Are the people at immigrations going to be punished for breaking a law by releasing private information about Obama’s half-aunt? The head person is leaving because a Democrat was elected and because she is already very unpopular with the Democrats in Congress. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) tried to hold up her appointment. McCaskill kept asking her for a list of businesses that had been fined for hiring illegals. After considerable stalling the answer was none. Typical Republican go after the little people but not the big companies that save money by hiring illegals.
The amount of what should be private information is now easily available.
My state has a huge amount of information on a public web site. It can be a good dating tool – check how much a person’s personal property is worth, all court cases.
Posted by: Julie | November 21, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Kudos to the democrats on this board who are advocating fairness. There are many good conservatives and liberals who do believe in things like fair treatment under the law and they see the hyprocrisy. I am a conservative (not neo-con, not religious, actual conservative) and am smart enough to recognize both parties have been hijacked.
Just as hopefully the GOPs loss will force some of the neocons out and spring real conservative leadership I hope that the sane minded democrats can oust the extremist left that has taken over the democratic party.
To the democrats on the board who are saying probing a private citizens record is ok you are total hypocrites. You might as well not EVER say anything about the patriot act, or ANY invasion of privacy issue.
It’s sad that the ACLU and other privacy groups have become so blatently biased along with the MSM. Regardless of your political affiliations america is losing out fast. An unethical and biased media can turn on anyone they please. Hopefully levelheaded democrats can see this obvious bias and we can all figure out a way to try to avoid the complete decimation of any credible media left in the US.
It’s sad when I have to go to reuters or another foreign news source to get a more accurate picture of US events.
Posted by: Cryos | November 21, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Let’s throw open all the databases. I say: Open Records for all. If a piece of information is recorded, it should be open for examination by all. There are plenty of examples of false and flawed information in records. There are plenty of examples of misbegotten wealth, priviledge and position based on lies, falsehoods, exagerations and unverifiable claims. Let’s all trust…but verify and put ALL information in the hands of the PEOPLE.
Posted by: who what where | November 21, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
It really is odd that there is such outrage about this lady. “Fire her?”. Sheesh, she’s just some worked up woman who was sure that this guy was a total fake. Personally, I’m pleased that we have obvious evidence that the GOP was using this guy as a tool to fool the rest of the nation. Moreover, is this how McCain would have led? Validating his theories and policies on liars?
If it came out that Obama had a half-aunt that was here illegally – and that info was public (as was Joe’s), I’d consider it a very important fact about our nation’s potential leader. Facts in a race like this seemed to be far and few between. I’d consider the person looking that up to be “responsible” and someone who is truly patriotic. She did some wrong, and deserves some punishment… perhaps, but this is no different than someone who catches a mugger and then get’s arrested for punching him too hard.
My favorite argument is, “If the GOP had done this heads would roll!!”. True or false, it is this attitude that is constantly excusing politicians from idiotic actions. Rather than dealing with the actual problem, they choose to deal with some fantasy result that didn’t actually happen…. IF it benefits their argument of the day.
Pretty sad. And, as a republican, I’ve got to say, after listening to the shrieking children on the right desperate for some consolation prize, I’m looking for a different party.
Posted by: Dan | November 21, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“If it came out that Obama had a half-aunt that was here illegally – and that info was public (as was Joe’s), I’d consider it a very important fact about our nation’s potential leader.”
That information did come out but was broken by a foreign news service since american media is completely biased. Looking up private records for her would be no better than doing it for any private citizen.
It really is odd that there is such outrage about this lady. “Fire her?”. Sheesh, she’s just some worked up woman who was sure that this guy was a total fake.
Pretty sad. And, as a republican, I’ve got to say, after listening to the shrieking children on the right desperate for some consolation prize, I’m looking for a different party.
Posted by: Dan
First off I seriously doubt you are a republican. Judging how you say it is “patriotic” to look up an average citizen and not Obama gives this away. It sounds like you are one of the angry liberals who are mad that an average citizen could pull Obama out of his shell and reveal some of his true intentions.
If you are a republican please do find another party.
Posted by: Cryos | November 21, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
OH:
I find it most often happens that ‘right wingers’ come here, bring up race and then accuse others of throwing racism in their faces.
That’s the truth of the ploy . . . and you’ve demonstrated it yet again.
Posted by: pefros | November 21, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
It’s amazing to hear all these democrats here who have been screaming about Bush wiretaps and Bush peering into their private lives over the last eight years flip on a dime and now advocate a policy of -zero privacy for anyone- simply because their man is in office.
Posted by: NM | November 21, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Get over it all you guys and gals that
voted. Obama won the election. Joe the
plumber doesn’t matter at this point.
Posted by: Harley | November 21, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Democrat here. I would sue her.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | November 21, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
DL
I agree. Her employer can make a judgement call but Joe should pursue this in court.
Posted by: Concerned | November 21, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
I think that immediately after Joe the Plumber becomes a law-abiding licensed plumber, he should go about his celebrity.
I hope somebody takes a collection for the woman that exposed Joe the Plumber and and also helped win this election for Obama.
Posted by: Common Sense | November 21, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Maybe the ACLU knows more than you all about Joe Wurzelplumber and his background, and they don’t want to ruin their credibility by getting involved with a political plant. There are suspicious associations, coincidences, and contradictions involved that point to him being just that.
Posted by: Shockolit | November 21, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
The shallow partisan commentaries here
show the impact of a failed public school system. The real issue here is that for the first time, a common citizen’s rights and privacy were trampled on for the sake of a campaign for someone who wants a job working for us. a total of 4 public servants so far have been implicated (all managers). If this issue is allowed to pass, we all can wait for that knock on the door in the middle of the night.
Posted by: Martin | November 21, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
What seems to be lost is the notion of who works for whom.
Does Strickland and H-J-K work for Obama or the people of Ohio?
30-days unpaid leave for helping BHO? That’s a new bulleted item on her resume!!!
Posted by: dom | November 21, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Whistleblowers of all party stripes should be encuraged and rewarded. Let’s always be on the lokout for the truth. Maybe we could find it easier if we could just look it up with our own access to records and databases.
We’d all be better off if we as a nation, became stakeholders in the pursuit of the truth. Let’s demand access to all records. Make all information records be free, open and available to us all.
Wouldn’t if be grand to be able to confirm the truth behind rumours if they’re true and reject all those nasty lies, suspicions and slander with just a click of the mouse. All records should be available to everyone online for free so that alll citizens can see what is true and what is manipulated and who is saying what about who for what purpose.
Funny how Republican partisans now want the Ohio Administrator punished because her revelations seemed to be in favor of candidate Obama, but they long ago praised the revelations coming from Whitehouse Administrator Linda Tripp when her revelations exposed former President Clinton’s misdeeds with Monica Lewinsky. Should both these events be treated as “a breach of privacy”?
Truth it seems is in the eye of the beholders and patriotic justification is always relative.
Posted by: who what where | November 22, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
This is a empeachable offense, but Obama will NEVER be president anyway.
Have you heard? ALL of Californias electoral votes MUST be awarded to Ambasadoor Alan Keyes! The reason is that California law requires the president to be a “natural born” citizen.
Obama did not have a natural birth, so he is out. McCain was born in Panama, so the California Secretary of State cannot award the votes to him. This leaves Ambasador Keyes as the remaining one on the ballot.
This is a HUGE loose of electoral votes for Obama. We may yet have the first black president, but it will be KEYES, NOT OBAMA!
Hold on to your hats my friends. This ELECTION IS NOT OVER YET!
Posted by: JRon | November 22, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am
Obama was born of an american mother.
he was born in america 50th state Hawaii
that makes him a citizen.
poor old alan keyes,he really should find something to do that would be of a real help to someone else-other than himself. the work he does, especially in this area must be very disturbing to his spirit.
Posted by: westcoastmessenger | November 22, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
There are two kinds of people. Those who want to be Right all the time and those who want to be Correct. We all run into those people who want to be Right all the
time. We just blow them off. The only people they fool is themselves. People who want to be Correct don’t mind being corrected. It makes you more humble and more of a whole person. Truth certainly sets us all free. Lets stop trying to be Right and look for the truth together. After all, we’re all in this together and either can lose a lot together, or, can take back our country together.
Posted by: Martin | November 22, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
I cannot believe that she still has her job! And not once has she even apologized or admitted doing any wrong. Regardless of parties or politics, how can this type of behavior be excused? And why isn’t the media all over this instead of just 2 and 3 paragraphs on the internet?
Posted by: Sherry | November 23, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
The only crime for which Administrator Helen Jones-Kelly is guilty: is that she didn’t do a more complete record search on all the political plants in all aspects of Ohio government and media and donors and bloggers.
Posted by: who what where | November 25, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm