By Natalie Gewargis

Nov 6, 2008 2:08pm

Matthews: I Want to Do Everything I Can to Make Obama Presidency Work

On Morning Joe this a.m., MSNBC’s Chris Matthews said, "I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new Presidency work….That’s my job. My job is to help this country, to make this work successfully, because this country needs a successful Presidency, more than anything right now."

There seems to me to be quite a difference between hoping the U.S. President succeeds in his endeavors — "Let every American hope for the success of the new president and the country we all love," Karl Rove wrote today in the Wall Street Journal — and a journalist thinking it’s his job to help a new administration.

What say you?

- jpt

User Comments

Looks like Tweety is looking at a Senate run.

Posted by: J in IN | November 6, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Not especially surprising coming from him. But if the regime brings back the Fairness Doctrine, will this statement be used to ensure that ALL Matthews’ airtime must be balanced by, say, Rush?
Just wondering.

Posted by: Byronius | November 6, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

A journalist job is to hold the elected politicians feet to the fire, to call them on things when they are wrong, to remind them why they have been elected and to let the nation know when they are doing the job that they are being paid to do. it is 3 fold and this year that went out the window never to return, so there will be no accountability by the American Press on Obama because if they were to hold him accountable, they would have to hold themselves accountable to for being in the tank for him for the past year.

Posted by: Brenda | November 6, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

old Chris is fun to watch and sometimes has a good substantial show..
but I’d never vote for him and I’m a Dem

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I’ve been mislead all these years, I always thought it was a journalists job to report the news as fair and balanced as possible. Now I know it is their job to pick the president and make sure he is viewed well…oh well learn something new everyday!

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 6, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Looks like Tweety is looking at a Senate run.”
There has been discussion about it after his comments on Colbert reports months ago.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Where was this devotion 8 years ago?
Look, he is a hack just as most of the media is today.
They got Obama elected with their constant negative attacks on McCain and Palin and fluff and padded stories on Obama.
MSNBC is rated the worst. They can nolonger be taken as a citable source for facts. They formulate opinion.
America woke up and realized that the media is slanted heavily to the left. When independent groups study the facts and report the results and only FOX was the only balanced news station there was, that is very telling.

Posted by: Deere | November 6, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“I’ve been mislead all these years, I always thought it was a journalists job to report the news as fair and balanced as possible. Now I know it is their job to pick the president and make sure he is viewed well.”
ROFLMAO….even works in the FoxNews slogan while blissfully unaware of the irony.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Not especially surprising coming from him. But if the regime brings back the Fairness Doctrine, will this statement be used to ensure that ALL Matthews’ airtime must be balanced by, say, Rush?
Just wondering.
Posted by: Byronius | Nov 6, 2008 2:19:55 PM
No, since MSNBC is clasified as a news channel (I use that phrase loosely).
The Fairness Doctine, for all intents and purpose is designed to regulate (many observers would say, not without cause, “squash”) talk radio.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 6, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Gee, wonder what Olberman’s JOB will be?

Posted by: cardinal | November 6, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I have to agree with Jake, doesn’t sound right to me. I don’t understand what he means at all. That’s just weird. I wonder what he’s up to.

Posted by: Hoping for a better Future (formerly:This is SO Old) | November 6, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Well, since he (and everyone else in journalism) did everything they could to get him elected, why would this be any different.
Amazing how the role of journalism has changed. Simply amazing.

Posted by: Jo | November 6, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Matthews’ statement is not that of a journalist. I’m reminded that not even NYT op-ed columnists are “allowed” to endorse presidential candidates, although it’s clear from reading their articles whom they support. But neither Matthews, Olbermann, or Maddows act as journalists any more than the crowd at Fox act as journalists. Instead their shows are news shows through their world views as liberals.
Does it bother me when I watch MSNBC, my news channel of choice? Not at all; I watch knowing that I’m getting a certain slant in the evening hours, which is why I’ll occasionally watch CNN to get more of a centrist view.
Matthews spent years in Democratic politics; my assumption is that viewers of his show know where his loyalties lie and that when he says stuff like that, he’s just getting carried away. It’s hard to take him all that seriously anyway, with all the giggling.

Posted by: Laurie Gold | November 6, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

“only FOX was the only balanced news station there was,”
FoxNews? The guys who ran every crappy internet rumor about Obama? The ones who made up the flags in the trash story? Who repeated gleefully the NY Post’s fake Michelle room service story? The ones who ran the Obama is a Muslim story?
ROFLMAO.
Want to know how big a joke FoxNews is?
Megyn Kelly grilled Tucker Bounds once, the right wing media went crazy and that was the end of ANY hard questions for the McCain campaign.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

“The Fairness Doctine, for all intents and purpose is designed to regulate (many observers would say, not without cause, “squash”) talk radio.”
The Fairness Doctrine only applies to broadcasts vs cable/satellite since the “people” own the airwaves.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

This is nauseating. Reporters are supposed to report the news not run the country.

Posted by: Kathy | November 6, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

You may want to note that the AP reporters in the study for excellence in journalism noted that again fox was the # 1 most balanced news. ABC came in # 2. I had believed the people who said that are republican. They beat up Democrats but they also beat up republicans. I think you will be surprised by the complete coverage.

Posted by: mike | November 6, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

I think it is good for reputable journalists like Chris Matthews to step up against the vile negative attacks Obama will have to suffer from idiots with a following like Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coutler and Hannity! They chomping at the bit to spew there hate speech to influence the hearts and minds of Americans against this Presidency! They would love this administration to fail!
You GO Chris Matthews and others like you! Protect the interests of main stream American who want UNITY!!!!

Posted by: Sara | November 6, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

all ‘journalists’ and ‘media’ need to get back to issues and rid themselves of the need to be entertainment shows…. 30 seconds on complex issues like the wars or the economy just doesn’t cut it…… less fluff more substance….
propaganda and lies from any political party should be called for what it is during interviews, this ‘fairness’ doctrine that has emerged over the last few years is an insult to viewers who hear lies and innuendo paired with
‘regular’ reporting.
Report the news and facts, and find someone who actually understands the subject for an even handed analysis of both sides of an issue.
Continue to travel around America and show how we really live and the problems we face.
Continue to travel around the world and really show the effects of American and other countries foreign policy, and frame it in an historical way by comparing it with the past.
I get my ‘funny news’ from Stuart, Colbert and Maher…….. ABC, you remember Bill Maher don’t you.

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

I would not call Chris Matthews a journalist. He is an opinionator and pundit and many people are interested in his opinions. I don’t find anything wrong with him supporting the president and doing everything he can to make sure the presidency succeeds.

Posted by: Rebecca | November 6, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Matthews did everything he could do ensure that the Bush presidency did NOT work and will do all he can to ensure that Obama’s does work.
This is a perfect example of balance. Kudos to Matthews for illustrating that the MSM is fair.

Posted by: Brad Brzezinski | November 6, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

ANYONE who thinks FOX NEWS is fair and balanced needs their head examined!

Posted by: Sara | November 6, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Chris Matthews needs to get out of the journalism business NOW! We all know he would not have said that had John McCain won. Let him run for the Senate if he thinks he’s a “chosen” one a la Senator Obama to turn the country around. Where are the charges of elitism?

Posted by: Laura | November 6, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Is this the end of individual freedoms in this country? Obama supporter Peggy Joseph actually believes her troubles are over because Obama’s welfare state will help her pay the mortgage and put gas in her car. Thousands of young Liberals in this country now think that the age of racism in this country is now “fixed” with the election of the first Black president. I feel sorry for these people, who once again, will be let down. There is no easy fix. Getting anything requires work, Obama worked to get to were he is, but the idea that life will now be all “laughter and light” is impossible. We are faced with people around the world that want the end of American exceptionalism, which is a result of productive workforce and individual freedom in America. The promises made by the democrat party that has promised them the moon, but it is only paper. Just watch and don’t blame me.

Posted by: Sansan | November 6, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

I could barely stand to watch Chris Matthews as the election neared. He cut off his guests and often went off on tirades.
I’m a Dem too. But, if he’s thinking of running for office, good luck with that.

Posted by: ohionative | November 6, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Does anybody Remember what news journalist are suppose to do. How about report the factual news.However I am sure that will not send any feelings up mr Matthews legs

Posted by: david natale | November 6, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Could someone give me the job description of a “journalist”?

Posted by: jonnie36 | November 6, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I channel surf…
MSNBC left
FOX right
CNN center
talk radio extreme right
and major newspapers, from left to right
it’s up to free Americans to inform ourselves, only a weak mind can be swayed in this country.
most people gravitate to shows that satisfy their political stripe.

Posted by: get a grip | November 6, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Who ever said Chris Matthews was a journalist? He hosts an opinion-show, a so-called “debate dungeon”. He’s not a journalist.

Posted by: echohotel330 | November 6, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

“I have. FOX News is the MOST fair and balanced and unbiased”
ROFLMAO.
Meg, the study you linked to called CNN the most neutral of the cable networks.
In cable, the evidence firmly suggests there now really is an ideological divide between two of the three channels, at least in their coverage of the campaign.
Things look much better for Barack Obama—and much worse for John McCain—on MSNBC than in most other news outlets. On the Fox News Channel, the coverage of the presidential candidates is something of a mirror image of that seen on MSNBC
The tone of CNN’s coverage, meanwhile, lay somewhere in the middle of the cable spectrum, and was generally more negative than the press overall.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“Obama supporter Peggy Joseph actually believes her troubles are over because Obama’s welfare state will help her pay the mortgage and put gas in her car.”
So what? Right wingers still think Iraq had WMDs and was part of 9/11.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Jake,
Is this a veiled shot at Fox News?
How much is the value of Fox News’ rah-rah-ing for the GOP? How about a Nightline expose on that, huh?
Under Bush, Fox has basically been a propaganda unit of the Bush presidency (and then the McCain campaign). They have been more pro-GOP than Pravda was in the USSR.

Posted by: Bud | November 6, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

“Almost always, when they have a right-leaning guest on to discuss an issue, they offset that w/ an equal left-leaning guest. Howard Wolfson (Clintonite) is on regularly, just as much as Rove.”
ROFLMAO.
Howard Wolfson is as left leaning as Joe Lieberman.
Right wingers love strawmen or easily picked on liberals.
Which is why Bund leader Hannity has to have his toadie Colmes.

Posted by: Ryan C | November 6, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Nothing offensive, but if he could keep from tinkling and erecting (paraphrase his own words) up on seeing and hearing our Dearest Leader, it would be a great help and a plus for his show.

Posted by: expecting | November 6, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

and…..
ABC, 1 more point about Bill Maher…
you folded under pressure when he spoke up during his show after 9/11 and the Iraq war started..
- many who took the political hits from the Bush administration and the ‘right’ now have been proven to be correct in their opinions and assumptions about what was going wrong in America under stressful times……
You could have shown more courage…

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Look within 9 months of taking office and Obama does not deliver the media will be all over him. No controversy .. No news, even Matthews.
I feel sorry for Obama, there is such high expectations of what he will do.The reality is this country is in the crapper and it’s going to take a long time to get us out of it.

Posted by: cissy55 | November 6, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Chris Matthews is not a reporter. He’s a commentator and a pundit. I love that he, Olbermann and Maddow will be around to cheer on President Obama, much like you right wingers were happy to have O’Reilly, Hannity and their ilk around cheering on George Bush and his illegal war. Joe Scarborough this morning was way off the loop when he tried to chastise Matthews — made Joe look like an idiot, again!

Posted by: hang | November 6, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I agree with Chris but not Joe.
The idea that any talking head is relaying news by trying to guess motives is just silly. A journalist should ask questions but not try to get ‘inside’ anyone’s head, as that is impossible. Guessing is not reporting the news.
It would make more sense to discuss Emanuel’s job history, in a factual way, to give us information.
Chris is right that we should all be rooting for the success of this president and to help in anyway we can. This is a true crisis time for our country.
Guessing motives is not journalism. Asking real questions is what real journalists do.

Posted by: Lydia | November 6, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Please tell me you folks are not getting your hard NEWS from political pundits!! You do know the difference, don’t you?

Posted by: hang | November 6, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Does MSNBC try, outside of Scarlborough????
Posted by: Dear Leader Chairman Maubama | Nov 6, 2008 2:53:58
————
Outside of Scarlborough, MSNBC is a farce, especially during the Primaries.

Posted by: expecting | November 6, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

So, if Obama can’t close Gitmo on Day One, will that be a failure or success? Just ask Chris!

Posted by: Mesquito | November 6, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I belive its nearing the end of Fox news can I get a YAHOO YAHEEE!!!!!!!WOOOH

Posted by: Angie | November 6, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Again, they lean right for sure, but they at least TRY to be fair. Does MSNBC try, outside of Scarlborough????
Actually, even knowing Mathews political bend….he always has the opposing point ov view.
Guiliani, Tucker Carlson, Pat Buchanan….and all other very right wing politicians,pundants and staff (he always has one from each side speaking)

Posted by: actually | November 6, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

2 great shows I enjoy for finding out information and opinion are:
- Charlie Rose on PBS
- Fareed Zakaria on CNN.
and since I am a Dem, Rachel Maddow’s
show is becoming a favorite also.
NO shouting,….
just great discussions about issues and opinions.

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

“I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often.’
Chris Matthews actually said this about his own reaction to an Obama speech. (Inquiring minds want to know if Mrs. Matthews knows about this quote.)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 6, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Why would the media change now? They never vetted Obama. I completely quit watching network nets program. I go to the abcnews website every day just to see the headlines. It was overwhelmingly biased. Palin’s medical records day 11? What about the person that Obama was/is? You’ll never question Obama or the Democrat’s. I hope that you all lose your jobs and go out of business. I don’t want biased right news either. I want questions asked and answered on ALL SIDES. Journalism is currently dead and sooner or later the average citizen will know that the country has been dishonorably served.

Posted by: Ginger | November 6, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Jake,
After some of the slanted language used in your postings during this campaign, I find it rather amusing to see you, of all people, discussing the appropriateness of journalistic behavior. Your disdain for Obama is often evident – disdain that I’d expect perhaps, from a commentator, rather than a journalist.
Which are you? Be honest with yourself.

Posted by: Henk | November 6, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Well said Chris Matthew. We all have our hopes and our futures tied to the good and honest leadership of President Obama. We should all support him and back him as he fights for the America people. President Obama has the intelligence and has shown a desire to surround himself with smart, caring, concerned people who will do good things for the country.

Posted by: Vicki | November 6, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

always good to keep in mind that Chris Matthews
likes to get folks, like Rep. Bachmen and others to hang themselves with dumb statements…and he seems to be pretty good at that aspect of his show.
Most of his show is on how the political game is played and really not all that much on substantive issues.

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Linda,
Check out MSNBC’s bio of Matthews. He is described as a news anchor and broadcast journalist, not a commentator.
Just like Olbermann thinks he has a “news hour”.

Posted by: cappamore | November 6, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

That sums it up. The media will not question him on anything. I didn’t expect anything else from them.

Posted by: Tina From Florida | November 6, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Joe Scarborough is so amazingly republican that he will join all the rabid republicans who will be at President Obama’s throat about any and every minor and worthless things they can come up with. Joe Scarborough will not be a stand up guy and give our new president the respect and period of time he deserves to even be sworn into office. Pathetic.

Posted by: Vicki | November 6, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Just a little peek through the window of the complete collapse of even a semblance of integrity left in the mainstream media. Every comment, like this one of Matthews’, is just another nail in the coffin of this dying, bloated beast.
In the months ahead, when the free ride given Barack Obama is fully exposed, the accountability that falls back upon the mainstream media will be their undoing. I give it two years before The New York Times is no longer in print, but only a tired, limping online press release for the democrat party.
The endless excoriation of Sarah Palin, as opposed to the relentless helping hand given Barack Obama, by the mainstream media was, in a word, wrong. And that deep wrong will come with a price for those “journalists”, like Chris Matthews, who sacrificed their principles for the sake of the revolting “thrill going up” their legs. The American people have seen right through it (even the most liberal people I know acknowlege it) and will only continue to turn their faces away, and find their news elsewhere.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I Will take Chris Matthews over Sean Hannity anyday, at least Matthews is Human Honest and a Real Journalist, what is Hannity A racisit right wing whack job and He Is a Pathetic joke of a Journalist!

Posted by: Angie | November 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Matthews has been in the tank for Obama since he got that tingle going up his leg. Maybe the tingle finally made it to his brain and short-circuited something, making him forget that he’s a member of the media, not a Carter staffer.

Posted by: Jake | November 6, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

The MSNBC and the other liberal media thrived for the last 4-8 years because of their bashing Bush and Republicans.
People like to watch negative news. People like to watch others in the media reinforce their own negative views. The liberal media thrived in that environment.
Now that Bush, Cheney, McCain and Palin are out of the picture MSNBC have to attack the new guy in office or no one will watch their shows.
How many times can Chris Matthews give a fluff piece about Obama’s new dog or Michelle’s new dress? People want to watch people digging up and slinging dirt on politicians. The only politicians in Washington for the next 4 years are all Democrats. If they don’t critique the people in power, their shows will die.
I doubt Matthews and Olbermann (and many others) will last through the first term of Obama.

Posted by: Richard J. | November 6, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Obama’s win was fair and square, at least in a political context, but can the media PLEASE stop kissing Obama’s feet?
I thought the job of the journalist was to be a watchdog on the government? That’s what I have been hearing.

Posted by: Wade | November 6, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I think we need to put Matthews’ remarks in context. He was reacting to Joe Scarborough’s clear partisan criticizing of Obama’s transitional plans. While I think Chris could have articulated it differently, I did not get the sense that he was showing partisanship. I felt he was confronting Scarborough about advancing the negative speculation about whether chaos was brewing in the Obama camp because Emanuel did not immediately pronounce his acceptance of the COS position. It was petty on Scarborough’s part, but Chris should have expressed it better.

Posted by: KT | November 6, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

How can Chris Matthews “help” other than spinning the news in a positive way?
That’s not what I want in a commentator. We need political pundits who will question the official White House version of things. Someone who will ask tough questions and get at what they’re NOT saying.
That’s about the ONLY thing that I’ve ever liked about Matthews – he never let anyone get away with just repeating their talking points – he made them answer his questions. If that changes, he’s worthless.

Posted by: Barb in MN | November 6, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Thank you Chris Matthews. The constant negativity of Morning Joe is one of the reasons that I change the channel. We as Americans need for the presidency to function, including the final days of the Bush Administration.

Posted by: Corinne | November 6, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

It’s a shame the media didn’t have the same attitude when the Bush administration took over.

Posted by: Maria | November 6, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I was watching Morning Joe this morning (I was actually woken up by Joe screaming about how Obama was blowing his transition with the whole Emanuel, “did he take the job or not” thing) and when he invited Chris to participate, he declined and offered what you have quoted.
I don’t think, however, that you are putting the discussion in its proper context, because soon after the exchange, Time Magazine’s Richard Stengal chimed in and said that with everything that needs to be done, we (journalists) shouldn’t be nitpicking trival matters such as whether Rahm Emanuel should have said “no comment” when the press confronted him at his home last night. Chris agreed. Joe shut his mouth.

Posted by: KM | November 6, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I say that you’ve apparently confused Chris Matthews with a bona fide journalist. The guy is nothing more than another bloviating TV personality with an inflated opinion of himself, who apparently thrives upon manufactured controversy and emotional contrivance.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | November 6, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Blue: I agree with you. The station changed Chris Matthews time because they said he was too biased. And he was the biggest promoter of Obama leaving Hillary and McCain sometimes out of the news. I didn’t vote for Obama but I am aware of the fact he is going to have severe problems. This generation of young college students that didn’t think before they voted will not be so happy later. It will all come to ahead and America will know what a mistake they made.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 6, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Chris Matthew is a JERK!

Posted by: catleya | November 6, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I didn’t know journalists could help presidents. That’s interesting.

Posted by: not MY president | November 6, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I voted Obama but MSNBC Matthews, Keith O., and Racheal Maddow were embarrasing in their bias. Chris, glad to know you are going to help Obama. He will probably sleep better tonight. BTW, Fox was as slanted for McCain as MSNBC was for Obama. Seems like the only place I could get UNBIASED news was the BBC. CNN was okay too.

Posted by: SUSIE | November 6, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

This guy is the biggest jerk around…wait, second next to Biden. He also said he doesn’t question the motives of politicians…since when, Tuesday??!!
When I saw that exchange this morning, I knew his tv career was OVER, thank God.
But don’t worry…Pennsylvania will make him a Senator in a couple of years!
Yikes.

Posted by: Jackie | November 6, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Chris is obviously speaking as his wannabe self, a democratic senator from PA.

Posted by: c2 | November 6, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

so what’s different from Matthews and every other network news person?

Posted by: zeke | November 6, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

We can all breathe easier, the media supports a Democrat President. Change we can believe in.

Posted by: obama=socialism | November 6, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

What, the “tingle up my leg” comment wasn’t proof enough that Matthews abandoned his journalistic credentials long ago?
The undercard to this truly historic and wonderful election is the official death of journalism. There were far too many stories that the MSM considered out of bounds, yet the day before the election Brokaw and Charlie Rose were lamenting the fact that they knew so little about Obama! You can’t make this stuff up.
The print media is on life support, meaning people no longer know who to turn to for the unbiased and unvarnished truth. You certainly won’t find it anywhere on the cable channels or the big three networks for that matter. There is a real market opportunity tight now to establish an online newsite worthy of Edward R. Murrow. Who will fill that gap? Jake?

Posted by: Woody | November 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

As long as he doesn’t mind riding coach on Air Force One and a pilot who doesn’t have soft landings, and doesn’t constantly whine about his hurt feelings and doesn’t tape the landing of the aforementioned, I guess he’ll be okay. Agreed?

Posted by: Dave | November 6, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

He’s right. We need a successful presidency.

Posted by: Tungsten | November 6, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

As long as we differentiate ‘political commentator’ from journalist, Chris and a number of his peers are free to hold and espouse their personal convictions.
But I really miss ‘journalists’ whose primary mission was to provide unbiased and factual reporting. Perhaps they will come back into vogue someday.
The folks at MSNBC were talking about how an Obama administration might deal with the ‘fairness doctrine’ … hope they understand it could apply to them as well. Might require a spinoff network.

Posted by: OneObservation | November 6, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

I actually saw Matthews say this on Morning Joe this morning. How pathetic! Of course, we all want the president-elect to succeed and for our country to be safe and prosperous. But it is not the role of a journalist to work to try to help the president succeed. And I could not help but notice that Matthews apparently did not consider it part of his duty as a journalist to support President Bush as he supports president-elect Obama. Matthews should be ashamed and MSNBC should stop allowing him to do anything other than his own Hardball program, which is no more journalism than OReilly is. It is commentary. It is polemic. It is not journalism.
The problem with cable news is that they have gone beyond blurring the line between advocacy and reporting. They have obliterated it. Commentary shows like Hardball and Countdown and O’Reilly and Hannity and Colmes should be distinct and seperate from the news programs. I must say, I think Fox News does a better job of keeping the lines between the two types of shows clearer than the others. MSNBC is the worst at it.

Posted by: moderate | November 6, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

As several readers pointed out here, Matthews is not a “reporter”, he is more like Imus, Sterns, and Limbaugh in that he has a stage to express his opinions and stomp all over teh ones he doesn’t agree with. But, apparently a lot of people watch him or he would be on day time TV competing with the soap operas. We need some more Dan Rather’s and Walter Conkrite’s. I am so tired of the sarcastic, argumentative journalists. We need to a kinder, gentler world.

Posted by: SUSIE | November 6, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Mariann Pepitone
all of the ‘opinion’ shows are there to get ratings for their respective networks. … if you remember there was a time where Coulter was in vogue as a guest during republican ‘times’ because of her invective and ‘over the top’ comments…..they do throw some ‘news’ in but mostly they are alll folks talking over each other….
College students vote (like everyone else in America) their individual beliefs…. no doubt there were many students voting Republican and now are second guessing their vote as they try to find a job and pay their biils.
Matthews will admit who he’s worked for politically, he doesn’t hide it, yes, his bias shows, but no more than many on the Fox network…. I have seen him ruthlessly grill both Dems & Repubs equally when he thinks the need is there.
Matthews doesn’t have the gravitas of a Walter Cronkite, currently, no one on TV has that. Cronkite’s opinion actually did matter to the public.

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

it’s too bad the ‘press’ wasn’t as aggressive in their pursuit of information about the Iraq war as they were about ‘who was in bed with who’, and how much haircuts cost…
when things are at their worst, and it’s really difficult to wade through the lies and distortions
of the government or political types, that’s when the ‘press’ is needed the most…..
the coverage of the Iraq war is a stain on the presses credibility that will linger for a long while……

Posted by: Blue | November 6, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Karl Rove and the rest of the bums that are looking for everything they can to say that as predident Obama will be a failure noone can do as bad as the administration that is leaving the White House now and that is with Rove thrown in the pot.We had to have them at the stern of the sinking ship for six yrs or the bus going into the ditch either way it was time for change and it might not come as fast as some want, it is great knowing that these nitwits are not there to keep screwing things up.They knew what was happening a long time ago but chose to look the other way because their pockets were already lined,and there is not only democrats that are suffering because of their failed policies but republicans as well.It is time for Americans to realize we are all here together and stop hating.Give him a chance just as you did with Bush for eight yrs,but already with the way Obama ran his campaign is an example of his leadership.And that is better than this country has been ran for the last eight yrs.

Posted by: damehen | November 7, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Some of you people are so dense it’s amazing. (lol)
I check in every now and then to see if people actually GET it. Answer? Nope.
Mathews’ remark about helping the Presidency centered on Joe’s comment about asking Rahm to join the staff a miscue. In true, biased, dumb a@@ Republican form he tried to SPIN Rahm’s delay in accepting the position. Chris Mathews simply called him on it by saying we should be doing what we can to HELP the President and not spin a NON-EVENT for political purposes.
Nothing more. Nothing less.

Posted by: Dems | November 7, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

as others have said on this thread, Matthews is not a reporter or a journalist. He is a political commentator. There is nothing wrong with what he said. Scarborough is as far to the right as Matthews is to the left… so it is laughable that he is trying to call Matthews out.

Posted by: Bdub | November 7, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Supporters of republicans have absolutely no credibility to argue against Obama or his decisions as of now. Good grief, he hasn’t taken office yet. These are the same people that gave unwavering support to Bush and republicans as they took us to war, looted the treasury and mismanaged our resources. They need to shut up, sit back and watch how intelligent adults handle the nation’s business.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | November 7, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Where was Matthews alleged “ethics” during the primary? He sure liked to pick apart non-issues when it came to Clinton.
MSNBC = buffoon cocoon

Posted by: Echo21 | November 7, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Its EVERYONES job to help the President not just journalists … we’re all in this together, “UNITED States of America” … it’s too bad you and a bunch of other Republicans don’t understand that Mr Rove.

Posted by: Tere | November 7, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

(QUOTE DAMEHEN: already with the way Obama ran his campaign is an example of his leadership.And that is better than this country has been ran for the last eight yrs.)
Amen to that!!!!

Posted by: Tere | November 7, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

As an Obama supporter from the beginning I am extremely proud and also feel a sense of duty to support President-Elect Obama and the new Administration.
However, it it the role of the journalistic community to examine the policies and actions of our political leaders and foster a healthy informed debate – not be in the tank.
I find the rah-rah journalism on either side of the spectrum does not serve us well.
BTW – well done on the Charlie Rose interview. I enjoyed your perspective on Obama and his style.

Posted by: bkw | November 7, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Yes and apparently it was the press’ job to cheerlead for the Iraq war back in 2003 – 2005. (Oh wait, I guess they still are..) Go USA! USA! USA! Matthews is such a bozo :-(

Posted by: TinFoilHat | November 7, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Way to Go Damehem!!!
Tell ‘em!!

Posted by: Rev. Ike | November 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Everybody’s got personal feelings politically, but journalists tout their ability to suspend them while at work. Matthews has really discredited not only himself, but as one of the more widely known journalists today, his profession. It feels like, oh, election night. Our media suspend emotion when reporting current events in Congo but practically throw a party when covering the Obama victory.

Posted by: KatieInLouisiana | November 7, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

If he thinks his job is to help a new administration, then he should send his resume to Rahm Emanuel.

Posted by: Bridget | November 7, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Whatever it is, Chris Mathews got courage. He is a straight shooter, sharp, and can handle a dozen, repetitious pin-heads like hannity.
We need more like him in main stream media.
Go Chris, you and your friends did a marvelous job on rightwing demolition.

Posted by: McCain | November 8, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Media bias is fine as long as the audience knows where you stand. Rush is the prime example. The networks however, hid behind the cloak of journalism to influence this election; a despicable act in my opinion. Finally though, a “Biden-esque” admission from Matthews that he was in the tank with Hussein. Priceless!

Posted by: minute man | November 8, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

IT IS THE JOB OF ALL OF US TO HELP GET OUT OF THE EXTREME MESS THE LAST 8 YEARS HAVE GOTTEN US INTO—-MATTHEWS IS VERY RIGHT ON WITH THIS.
QUIT BLUBBERING OVER THE REPUB LOSS AND GET ON WITH IT.—THE POLITITIONS ARE HANDLING THIS FAR BETTER THAN THE CHILDREN OUT HERE.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

All the help in the world can’t make him presidential material. They can put him and his wife through all the presidential rigors but it won’t do any good. He is just a street smart, slick Chicago politican.
What is Chris Matthews going to do??
Ha ha.. what a joke.
America made a HUGE mistake electing this charlatan.

Posted by: ml | November 8, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Matthews said:
My job is to help this country.
Now just what part fo that do you not understand? A journalist’s job is NOT to try to gin up controversy just to get more publicity, it’s to INFORM the people. Clearly, that’s what Matthews is saying he will do.

Posted by: Tom J | November 8, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

All you need to ask yourself is….
Would Matthews say this if McCain won?
Nope…

Posted by: AJO1974 | November 8, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.