No Compromise On Stimulus and Trade Agreement, Emanuel Says
President-elect Barack Obama said this week that he wants Congress to pass a fresh economic stimulus package "sooner rather than later." Democratic leaders proposed last month that Congress reconvene after the election for a rare lame-duck session to pass a new stimulus, but the White House is reluctant to do so in the final months of Bush’s presidency. However, the administration signaled that the President could sign on this year if Congress attached the Columbia Free Trade Agreement. When I asked incoming White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel this morning whether this was a trade worth taking, he made clear that Obama opposes the compromise: "You don’t link those essential needs to some other trade deal," he said on "This Week." On what a broader stimulus would look like under the Obama administration, Emanuel said, "it is essential that we focus on the stress and strains on the middle class." But he would not say whether the President-elect would postpone his proposed tax increase on the wealthy. –George Stephanopoulos

Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
George Stephanopoulos you can stop licking Obama’s nut sack now.
Posted by: Anita Yova | November 9, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
George Stephanopoulos make sure you remind Obama that he promised all the working people 1000 dollars every year from the government.
Posted by: dandle lion | November 9, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Here is some advice to those individuals that are disappointed in the outcome of the elections. If you voted for Senator McCain and Governor Palin or if you were a disenfranchised Senator Clinton Supporter. Here are a few things that you can do to maintain in the upcoming four years.
1. 86 The Blogs, all of them, stay off of all of these blogs, specifically the ones that are left leaning and here is why. The Obamabots that have been on these blogs spewing nastiness towards the other candidates have not changed and they will not change, they will continue to come on the blogs and spew their hatred along with defend Obama, they have to defend him, because they have to justify voting for him. Let’s be clear, THEY WILL NOT HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANYTHING. You will not get through to them, you will not change their minds, you will just fuel them. Let them argue amongst themselves and rip each other apart. If there is no one responding to them, they have no power.
2. During the Primaries and General Elections, you pretty much knew which network and radio stations were in the tank for Obama, now is your opportunity to let these networks know that you did not appreciate their inability to bring you fair and balanced reporting. Boycott these networks and their advertisers and let them know why you are doing it. Hold them accountable. Remember they will continue to be in the tank and they will continue to skew the news so that they can justify their behavior during the elections, THEY WILL NOT HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANYTHING. If they tell the truth they will then have to take responsibility for not fully vetting Obama and they will not do that. Primary example: Chris Matthews on MSNBC already said that it is his responsibility to make sure that Obama’s Presidency is successful, this from someone who is listed on that network as t a Reporter. You have more power than you know.
3. Go out into your communities and dedicate your time and efforts: volunteer and look into your local city council and other city government initiative. Become and activist for those things which are of importance to you and your families. Make a difference. While the Obots are sitting and sucking up Oxygen trying to defend their votes, you can be out here making a difference for your children and their children.
4. There has been much talk about the fairness doctrine, which they more than likely will go after. I am a democrat turned independent and I am not loyal to any particular party, but I think that the left and the right should have the ability have their own stations or shows if they want to . Here is a solution. The Fairness Doctrine does not include Satellite radio, so here is a way to help the economy and help talk radio and put money in your own pockets. If this is passed, go out purchase a satellite radio and invest in the satellite companies, invest in organizations that gives you what you want. Encourage the talk radio host to go satellite and invest in their advertisers and the satellite products, this way you get to keep your talk radio and you also get to invest your money in products that support what you believe in. You have more Power than you know.
5. I know that you may be upset about the person that you felt would be best for the country not winning, but give the new administration a chance, although you may think in your heart that they will not do the right thing, give it an honest chance, because in four years, you get to be heard again. Instead of coming on blogs and arguing with people who will not budge no matter what because they have to defend their choice. Contact your congress Person, and State Senators and let them know what you do and do not like, remember many of the Democrats managed to get into their seats on Obama’s coat tails and because of the frustration of the country with the present administration, but the representatives know that they are more venerable than Obama, because the constituents will not be as loyal to them if they do not do what they promised their states and cities. Stay on them and let your voices be heard, put pressure on your Governors also, because many of them supported the President elect and if he is not governing from the center to accommodate all citizens then you let them know and they will be forced to push back out of concern for their own seats and their own careers. You have more Power than you know.
6. Last but not least, set a goal for four years from now, just think in four years you can earn an undergraduate degree, possibly 2 Masters Degrees, a Certification of some sort, take this next four years to make your life and the lives of your children and your families better. Do not wallow in pity but rise up and take action and become more involved. Stay off of the blogs, read the papers and look at the news shows that will give you fair information and keep abreast. This is your best weapon. Let the gloaters continue to gloat as they lose four years of their lives protecting their vote, you would have gained a great deal during this time no matter how this administration turns out.
Posted by: Brenda | November 9, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
its fantastic to see obama taking charge, clearly america made the right choice… and i sure hope he doesn’t compromise on his promise to make the rich pay their fair share of taxes… they have been getting away with way too much priviledge
Posted by: earthisnotflat | November 9, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I am here to collect on my 1000 dollars Obama promised me every year of my life since I am working making under 250,000 dollars a year.
Pay up. NOW
Posted by: scandleous | November 9, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
The US Government should establish a Soverign Fund called “Invest in America’s Future”. The units could cost $100 and all Americans and permanent residents should be asked to make this tax-free investment. Foreigners should also be allowed to invest up to about ten percent of the fund, which no-one should be allowed to sell for 10 years. The fund could be divided into four units and could be managed by the best and brightest people in the business. Most investments should be made in American companies and dividends should be re-invested. About 25 percent of the funds could go into companies that develop technology for an energy independent future. I am sure that many oil rich countries would want to invest in an alternative energy fund. This might eliminate the need for tax increases in America and could even make the middle-class tax cuts more possible. People would then feel that they have done something to help their government in this crisis while making a great investment for themselves or their children. A win-win situation!
Posted by: Katherine Kemp | November 9, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
The stock market has already issued its take on the Obama economic plan. Never before has the stock market seen a slide like the one the week after Obama won the presidency. The smart money is clearly not impressed with the Obama plan to tax businesses and capital gains. CARTER II STARTED 11/4/2008.
Obama won the presidency and the stock market died.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Wow, it looks like a lot of people overdosed on their stupid pills this morning. Enjoy your attempts to pull the GOP out of the wilderness. The rest of us will get to work on repairing the damage the Repugs have done to the U.S. for the last eight years.
And if you really love the CFTA so much, head to Colombia. That’s where American jobs will go if that monstrosity is signed.
Posted by: Gemina13 | November 9, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
This interview with Rahm Emanuel was worth nothing other than to say nothing has changed in politics. The simplest questions were danced around. My God the election is over and Obama doesn’t have to worry about pleasing everyone until 2012. Why can’t a direct and honest answer be given? I suppose the kind hearted way to look at the continued lack of specific responses is to say that his team don’t know what they are going to do now that they won. I will say that Obama himself on Friday looked like the whole weight of this office hit him. I wonder how he will look with gray hair four years from now.
Posted by: tiredtoo | November 9, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Posted by: Brenda | Nov 9, 2008 1:58:52 PM
1. Where was the nastiness coming from? Look no further than Palin and the Republican ticket.
2. If the Republicans would have run on ISSUES and not the smear and fear of old, the media might have treated them a bit differently.
3. This is what Obama wants. He wants everyone to get more involved.
4.”but I think that the left and the right should have the ability have their own stations or shows if they want to .”
I think they already do.
5.Let Obama get in office first and see what he does, then you can use that if it’s not going the way we want.
6. The Democrats found out the truth about what the GOP was saying and researched enough to know they were lying about Obama.
The problem with a lot of the Republicans was that they did not look to see if what they were being told was the truth. My suggestion is go to sites from both sides and make your decision.Check the facts that you are being fed.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Where is my $1000.00? I also want my credit cards paid off, my mortgage rate reduced and a new car. I voted for Obama because he promised me that I will no longer need to be accountable or to work for my keep. The democrats were going to give me money from all of those rich guys. Does anyone know when to expect those things to satrt taking place?
Posted by: LaFonda | November 9, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Posted by: tiredtoo | Nov 9, 2008 2:37:44 PM
He is President elect, he doesn’t take office until Jan 20th. Why should or would he make decisions on things before he actually takes office? We still have a President in office who can make these decisions for the next 2 months.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Where is my $1000.00? I also want my credit cards paid off, my mortgage rate reduced and a new car. I voted for Obama because he promised me that I will no longer need to be accountable or to work for my keep. The democrats were going to give me money from all of those rich guys. Does anyone know when to expect those things to satrt taking place?
Posted by: LaFonda | Nov 9, 2008 2:45:34 PM
He said no such thing you twit.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 2:17:56 PM
Ok Einstein, I see you are still posting nonsense. Tell me how McCain wouldl have pulled us out of this mess.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Is that really a woman using the crude remark like nut sack? How gross! I am embarrassed for that person to have never learned communication skills better than that to make a point. Sad!
Posted by: Mary Menard | November 9, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
But that’s what socialists do. Certainly left wing socialists. Does anyone know when we can expect our checks?
Posted by: LaFonda | November 9, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Posted by: Mary Menard | Nov 9, 2008 2:51:49 PM
Yeah real classy that one.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I am amused by those that say “wait until he gets in office” before we criticize Obama. That is not what happened with Reagan, nor either of the Bush administrations. It is a sad fact, but this is the new nature of politics in America. You look for the first sign of vulnerability and you attack relentlessly. If you can shape the narrative of the incoming president before he even takes office so much the better. This environment was not created by conservatives but rather started with the treatment the left gave to Ronald Reagan. For them to now say, “hey, give him a chance” is a little too late. It is up to the left to demonstrate that they have changed and will treat republicans with respect, even as we disagree on issues and argue the merits of our respective approaches. However, do not for a minute believe that conservatives in being critical of Obama are doing anything that they have not done, and indeed, a tactic that they started.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
I heard that we should be getting our money by March 1st. I’m gonna buy me an iPod and spinners for my car
Posted by: Tyrell | November 9, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Tyrell,
Spinners? cool. But you are thinking way too small. Obama is going to pay for your rent and gas for your car as well. With all of that extra money you can p!mp you whole ride…
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Tell me what took place before Reagan and Bush took office. I am curious.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
yep march 1st. I’m gonna buy some new clothes and maybe one of those xbox things
Posted by: Winston | November 9, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I see the twit brigade is out in full force today.You must have read that nonsense on Fox news.
I hope he proves all you people wrong.
Curt,
I am still waiting for an answer to this
Tell me how McCain wouldl have pulled us out of this mess.
Posted by: Jwench | Nov 9, 2008 2:51:12 PM
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I thought it was $1000.00 each person, so I have my sights on a surround sound system for my family with blue ray player and xbox. I’m going all out this year. Is it going to be $1000.00 each year?
Posted by: Stephon | November 9, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
You can call us twits all day as long as we get our money by March 1st. Obama promised.
Posted by: Keyrell | November 9, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Rahm again is looking out for the American people first. As we see many of the Clinton staff included in the Obama team. Clinton staffers were loyal and it paid off. I wonder what happen to the turn coat Communication Director Clinton had. Oh well it shows what real friendship means. Obama had a good lesson from Bill Clinton’s experience. Bill and Hillary helped Obama win his Senate seat. Now Rahm will fight for the rights of Americans in the Obama Administration. At lease Obama/Biden know who the people are as many change sides now.
Posted by: Jackie | November 9, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
jwench,
How would McCain have acted differently? First, he would not plan to raise taxes on businesses or capital gains as we head into a recession. this is truly irresponsible. Second, McCain never proposed an additional 700B to 1T in new social programs at a time when we already have programs we simply cannot pay for. Third, McCain would have allowed domestic production of oil. Russia, Iran, and Venezuela are waiting and watching Obama. If they can prey on his lack of foreign policy experience to threaten worldwide oil supply they can drive the price back over $120/barrel. When Joe Biden spoke of the impending failure in the first six months of an Obama administration this was the first area I thought would be a target. Of course, this is the same scenario that caused Carter to implode. History repeats…
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Posted by: Keyrell | Nov 9, 2008 3:02:05 PM
When and where did he say that? He did say the middle class will get a tax cut and the wealthy would pay more. Show me a specific quote that states what you said from a non Republican news site.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
yes it is 1000.00 per person per household. Me and my old lady will be getting busy. I figure with the 8 kids that we have plus having 3 or 4 more in Obamas firt 4 years, we could be raking in 13-14,000 per year. Add that to my unemployment & “side jobs” we’re set!
Posted by: Keyshawn | November 9, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
wench Definition
wench (wenc̸h)
noun
a girl or young woman: now a derogatory or jocular term
Archaic
a country girl
a female servant
a sexually loose and immoral woman
Posted by: Anonymous | November 9, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
It seems a lot of people are confusing the stimulus package to be the same as the last time. NO, this go directly into creation of jobs and other things like road repairs which we further create jobs. It wont be same as last time. you may get some check but not what you think
Posted by: vuzous | November 9, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Keyrell understands the impression that was left with Obama supporters. I have a few in my office. They really believe from listening to Obama that it is now their time to suckle on the government teat. If Obama is as intelligent as some believe he should have known how his promises would be perceived. He will now have to explain to these people that it was all just a campaign promise. Of course, this comes AFTER he got their vote. Wait until this group realizes that higher taxes on business will cost them their jobs.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
More jobs? Road work? What are you taliking about? Obama never mentioned work. He old said he was going to give away money by taking it from other and giving us some cash. Wait a minute here…
Posted by: Luther | November 9, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Obama doesn’t have a ball sack. His wife does.
Posted by: Jeff | November 9, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
And people should forget drilling. That drilling issue was a gimmick. I will go with Obama and his alternatives. That is the future of the 21st century and it will also eliminate our dependence on foreign oil making us more secure. We have too many enemies just because of oil. They will never tell you, the two gulf wars was as a result of oil, the Georgian debacle was also due to oil. It is time to focus on Americans, rebuild our military and reduce out interference in other countries affairs and still maintain our world power.
Posted by: vuzous | November 9, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Top 2012 campain slogans:
1) Just say no to socialism
2) It doesn’t take “special intelligence” to drive the economy into the ditch
3) New spinners for everyone!
4) Listen to what I say not what I do – please (B. Obama)
5) Hype over results for four more years
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
vuzous -
I agree as long as the 1000 is coming
Posted by: LaRoyal | November 9, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
craigs list has spinners on sale
Posted by: LaFonda | November 9, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
LaFonda, hey, quit being cheap. You got the Obama ATM in your house. You don’t need to buy second hand.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Yeah, more jobs. The Stimulus issue was where Biden made that gaffe, three-letter words, JOBS. And it also was the issue that resonated when Hillary Clinton said jobs, baby, jobs
Posted by: vuzous | November 9, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
wench Definition
wench (wenc̸h)
noun
a girl or young woman: now a derogatory or jocular term
Archaic
a country girl
a female servant
a sexually loose and immoral woman
Posted by: | Nov 9, 2008 3:09:04 PM
What’s your point moron? I am none of the above. Can’t even use your name when attack someone. Coward.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
You responding to every one’s non pro Obama opinion here tends to favor the servant definition. At least we see the Obama brownshirts are still active on the payroll.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 9, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
jwentch,
Perhaps the anonymous poster was making a reference to the less than stellar respect Obama has shown toward women. Maybe he was pointing out how an Obama supporter also chose a name that demeans women. Only my take, please feel free to ignore in all self righteous haste.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
More jobs? Road work? What are you taliking about? Obama never mentioned work. He old said he was going to give away money by taking it from other and giving us some cash. Wait a minute here…
IF any of you dolts would have bothered to read or listen to what he said, he said no such thing. That is what the Republican smear machine wants you to believe. I looked at Fox and some other Republican sites before the election and most of what they had posted was snippets and not the full quotes.
IF you are that stupid then I can see why you voted for the same old crappola the GOP fed you. Here’s a concept try and read up on both candidates, from unbiased websites and news channels, then make your decision.
We did not need 4 more years of the same crap that didn’t work the last 8.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
McCain would have dealt with this mess by being a Mavericky Maverick, doggone it! He’d take the 6 oil lobbyists that made up his economic advisory team and boy, he’d get so mavericky, it’d make your head spin!
And, gee, maybe the stock market plunged the week after the election because all the numbers that week, including the highest unemployment rate in years came out and consumer confidence hit the floor.
Posted by: Fessup | November 9, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Anonymous, you are an thought provoking instigator… I LIKE that.
2012 slogan: “brown shirts” for Obama
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The interstate highway system is 50 years-old. The nation’s infrastructure is crumbling. Put people to work in essential work to literally rebuild America and its vital transportation grid. It’s a win-win situation which will pay for itself many times over! You can feel that intelligence, competence and respect for the common good is back in vogue. Hallelujah!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | November 9, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 3:26:42 PM
Whatever. Two instances in the primaries where he was a little sexist with Hillary. Yes I was a big Hillary supporter, btw.
Other than that show me where he specifically said anything against women in the general election.
McCain is the one that disrepects women. Calling his wife the c word?
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
McCain would have dealt with this mess by being a Mavericky Maverick, doggone it! He’d take the 6 oil lobbyists that made up his economic advisory team and boy, he’d get so mavericky, it’d make your head spin!
And, gee, maybe the stock market plunged the week after the election because all the numbers that week, including the highest unemployment rate in years came out and consumer confidence hit the floor.
Posted by: Fessup | Nov 9, 2008 3:29:29 PM
I keep trying to tell these naysayers that but, you might as well talk to the wall. OF course that is all the Democrats fault, right?
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
jwentch, Do you get paid by the Obama campaign? I don’t care one way or the other but I would like to know who I am debating with.
It seemed odd during the campaign that a concerted effort was made on behalf of Obama to dominate the blogs associated with MSM stories. Surprising, but I guess he had enough cash after going back on his promise to take public financing.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
jwentch, Do you get paid by the Obama campaign? I don’t care one way or the other but I would like to know who I am debating with.
It seemed odd during the campaign that a concerted effort was made on behalf of Obama to dominate the blogs associated with MSM stories. Surprising, but I guess he had enough cash after going back on his promise to take public financing.
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 3:37:47 PM
I am from PA. One of the states that helped Obama win. I wasn’t going to even vote for Obama after the primaries. In fact back in the primaries I said I would never vote for him.
Over time, I found that McCain and then Palin lied most of the time and were more of the same old stuff. Palin was a big mouth know nothing to put it bluntly.
I researched both candidates and saw that Obama was pretty close to Hillary on a lot of things, and I like some of his ideas. Therefore, I cast my vote for Obama as did the rest of my family. All but one were Hillary suppporters in the primaries. The other backed Obama from the beginning and she used to be a Republican.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Anonymous, I just had a thought. You might be wise to not give your name. When one makes Mr. Obama look bad history shows that your tax filings will be examined, that your professional associations and licenses will be researched, and any traffic ticket you have ever gotten will be offered as “proof” that you are a dangerous subversive. The Obama “brown shirts” have a deep reach. Ohh cr*p – someone is knocking at the door. Pray for me…False alert, they said they were from the government and they are here to help me. I’m sure everything will turn out JUST fine.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 3:43:08 PM
Continue with another lie. Obama’s campaign had nothing to do with that. The one woman had donated money to his campaign , just like millions of others and was not part of his campaign. The other one did it on her own.
Maybe that is why your candidate lost, you Republicans don’t know how to tell the truth.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
The second most dangerous words ever spoken:
“I’m from the government and I’m here to help you”
(R. Reagan – spoken to highlight the folly of intrusive government)
——————————–
The most dangerous words ever spoken:
“spread the wealth around”
(B. Obama – spoken as a “slip” that none the less fits with his writings and past invovement in community organizing)
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
The gandiose Obama presidency begins. The dark clouds will surely be rolled back and honey will most assuredly fill the mouth of every true believer. The wrong will be made right and small children will remain small children forever, to live in ecstatic bliss.
Open scene one: The Chief Of Staff pick
Birds are singing…
Sun beams are bent by the sheer momentiousness of the event
Surely this signals the emergence of a great “post-partisanship” epoch
And the pick is……
ffffffttttttttttt – Rham Emmanuel – what? The partisan hack from the Clinton administration?
I want my money back. This was the worste movie ever. Sheeessh.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The most dangerous words ever spoken:
“spread the wealth around”
(B. Obama – spoken as a “slip” that none the less fits with his writings and past invovement in community organizing)
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 3:53:27 PM
Post the whole quote and you will see what he meant. Of course the GOP backers only posts part of his comments.
Here is the ENTIRE quote:
I just want you to be clear – it’s not that I want to punish your success – I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you – that they’ve got a chance at success too.”
Obama said, “My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody.
“If you’ve got a plumbing business, you’re gonna be better off if you’re gonna be better off if you’ve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybody’s so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
Without customers who would have a successful business? Think about it.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Can you imagine the unemployment rate when all the Obama bloggers are let go?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 9, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Can you imagine the unemployment rate when all the Obama bloggers are let go?
Posted by: | Nov 9, 2008 4:06:59 PM
Must be why the unemployment rate spiked. McCain let his staff and paid bloggers go.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
And on the eighth day the one they called “The One” ascended to the top of a cheesy podium, bedecked in what appears to be a blue cardboard sign, to proudly declare: “Unto you this day I give to you, the little people, a man that stabs the table in fits of rage. Join me now in looking reverently at my Chief of Staff – the great hope of post-partisanship…..Uh, by the way, ignore the barking and the feel of teeth gripping your leg.”
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Obama and the Democrats plot to take your 401k money… Crooks
http://www.carolinajournal.com/articles/display_story.html?id=5081
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 4:24:39 PM
Funny, you call the Democrats crooks. What do you call Bush and Cheyney?
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
jwench – you requested a link to the 401k story and I have provided one. Have you read what the Democrats are planning? Is this really what you were hoping for when you voted for Obama?
This is outrageous, and the Democrats havn’t even taken control yet. What will they be up to in 6 months or 3 years from now? This is seriously frightening stuff, that government can swoop in and take my savings and the savings of other Americans.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
jwench,
Neither Chenney nor Bush has ever proposed taxing 401k contributions, much less letting the government take the money I already have in my account.
Show me where either of them or anyone in the Republican party has proposed such a thing.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
jwench,
Neither Chenney nor Bush has ever proposed taxing 401k contributions, much less letting the government take the money I already have in my account.
Show me where either of them or anyone in the Republican party has proposed such a thing.
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 4:36:33 PM
I didn’t say they did. You called the Democrats crooks.
I am asking you then what do you call Bush and Cheyney? They lied about the Iraq war. They have wiretapped innocent AMERICAN citizens. If anybody is a crook it is those two.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Read this quote from the Democrats that would like to take your 401k money from you – please read the entire article at Carolinajournal. Jwench, is this really what you wanted when you voted for Obama?
In a radio interview with Kirby Wilbur in Seattle on Oct. 27, 2008, Ghilarducci explained that her proposal doesn’t eliminate the tax breaks, rather, “I’m just rearranging the tax breaks that are available now for 401(k)s and spreading — spreading the wealth.”
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Another telling quote on just how radical the Democratic party has become in their pursuit to insert themselves in our lives. This explains the “why”, from the Democratic parties perspective that all of us should allow the government to take our 401k accounts from us.
———
On July 31, 2008, Robert Greenstein, executive director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, testified before the subcommittee on workforce protections that “from the standpoint of equal treatment of people with different incomes, there is a fundamental flaw” in tax code incentives because they are “provided in the form of deductions, exemptions, and exclusions rather than in the form of refundable tax credits.”
Even people who don’t pay taxes should get money from the government, paid for by higher-income Americans, he said. “There is no obvious reason why lower-income taxpayers or people who do not file income taxes should get smaller incentives (or no tax incentives at all),” Greenstein said.
Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
what abount my spinners? Mr. Obama promised
Posted by: Leroy | November 9, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Curt,
Most everything you Republican people post are lies. I read it. I happen to work for the Federal Government and I am covered under FERS. I also have a TSP account that I contribute to.
Also I have googled that and the only sites I see that are saying that are right leaning ones.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
We can stop talking about the election now – he was voted in by 19 yr olds that don’t even know what Vietnam was and racist blacks! Move on and support our Messiah!
Posted by: Marcus | November 9, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
jwench,
Don’t like the Carolina Journal for some reason? OK, how about the liberal NBC? You cannot dismiss this with any intellectual honesty. Be thankful that you have a government account but leave my 401k and the 401k’s of other Americans alone.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/27558644
Posted by: Leroy | November 9, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
jwench,
Don’t like the Carolina Journal for some reason? OK, how about the liberal NBC? You cannot dismiss this with any intellectual honesty. Be thankful that you have a government account but leave my 401k and the 401k’s of other Americans alone.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/27558644
Posted by: Leroy | Nov 9, 2008 5:31:06 PM
I am just wondering why when I google it that all the sites are saw were Republican sites.
I don’t get where you people are getting he is going to take away your 401k. From that site you posted :
“The Democrats are looking at two paths,” she said.
“One is to make the 401(k) system, which is commercial and individualized, more fair, but not do anything to expand coverage or guarantee returns.”
The other path is to broaden coverage and guarantee returns. “I think the compromise will be a voluntary guaranteed retirement account.
So that if people don’t have a 401(k), or want a better alternative to a 401(k), they could put their money into a government-guaranteed fund
This woman is one of many proposals being looked at:
Teresa Ghilarducci, an economist at the New School for Social Research in New York, floated a radical alternative to 401(k)s at a hearing held by Miller Oct. 7.
Under her plan, workers would receive a annual $600 tax refund if they set aside 5 percent of their pay into a retirement account run by the Social Security Administration, which would then invest globally in risky assets to seek high returns.
From that pool, workers would be paid a guaranteed 3 percent a year indexed to inflation.
The change would encourage workers not to hang on to jobs longer than planned.
Because their returns would be guaranteed, workers would be able to retire on schedule, she said.
Where in that entire article does it say that is concrete and where does it say that you must contribute to the government sponsored one?
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Im just glad that the most important issue has been settled…….there is gonna be a hypoallergenic pooch in the whitehouse.
Posted by: boxcar | November 9, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
I watched the Emanuel interview. More than five minutes of nothing. He never answered one question. Every response was a repeating of “President OBama has made it clear many times that he ……”. Why do you waste the time with people like him that won’t say anything but parrot the party line? Do these type of politicians think that us everyday Americans are idiots? If they want my vote they need to talk a little straighter!!!
Posted by: Kerry Kissinger | November 9, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Anita Yova, you have the dirtiest mouth I have heard, you are vile, ignorant, you have a toilet mouth.
I can not say enough of how low you are!
Posted by: lions2tigers | November 9, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Barack Obama = Jim McGreevey according to his male s*x partner. He is recommending Obama come out of the closet before he is subjected to black mail attempts.
Posted by: greg | November 9, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Posted by: Kerry Kissinger | Nov 9, 2008 6:25:08 PM
Like McCain talked straight…lol
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Barack Obama = Jim McGreevey according to his male s*x partner. He is recommending Obama come out of the closet before he is subjected to black mail attempts.
Posted by: greg | Nov 9, 2008 6:39:16 PM
WE don’t need to hear about YOUR sexual fantasies. Next lie?………
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
You all seem so worried about the wealthy having to pay taxes of any type as it may impact jobs.
About four years ago the big business I worked for(for almost 20 years) was sold to an even bigger business. The president of the company I worked for received well in excess of $18,000,000.00 for the sale (not counting any golden parachute clause). I and almost everyone who worked in the company lost their jobs (to be fair not all as a few Executives were given jobs within the compay that bought the business). So, if you think that I care if the president of the compnay I worked for had to pay taxes on the money from the sale of the business … here’s a news flash I don’t care if he had to pay on it and I don’t particularly care if when he passes away if his family has to pay on that inheritence. A lot of people lost jobs and even though you get another job it takes time and in some instances it’s like starting over. Although I’m sure he found loopholes to hide the money so he didn’t have to pay.
Seems to me job loss is usually accelerated by greed. The heads of companies can alway make money by selling plus coporate attorneys can always help their high profile clients find ways to shall we say “hide” profits so they won’t be taxed. Businesses take jobs overseas not because of taxes here, but because they can get cheaper labor and they don’t have to offer healthcareor other benefits and that improves their bottom line and keeps their shareholders happy with higher dividends.
Posted by: I've had it | November 9, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Barack Obama in my fantasy..BARF
People like Larry Craig, Jim McGreevey, Barney Frank, Gerry Studs, and Mark Foley never learn. If Obama is like McGreevey or Craig it could be down right embarrasing. These types of people have an ego about them that makes them believe they will never be caught. sooner or later they all are.
I don’t want to see my president doing some dude in a video.
Posted by: greg | November 9, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Posted by: I’ve had it | Nov 9, 2008 6:53:29 PM
That is like that one CEO who got a 66 million dollar severance package. That is why these big fat cats need to start paying more taxes. That is a ridiculous amount of money to be paying somebody, and that was just to leave the company!
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Posted by: greg | Nov 9, 2008 6:55:38 PM
Seems to me you are the only one thinking about it. Are you having a sexual identity crisis?
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Catie, catie, catie, … Here’s candy, candy, candy, ….
Posted by: fat cat | November 9, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
scandleous
LaFonda
Keyshawn
Winston
Stephon
I have never laughed so hard since the election, thanks for putting Obama’s promises into perspective.
Do you know if there is a line we need to get in? I would like an xbox, spinners and surround sound also.
Posted by: HH | November 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Posted by: HH | Nov 9, 2008 7:48:19 PM
Just shows that no child left behind didn’t work for the Republicans, they obviously can’t read or listen to what he said.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
So who will be wearing the Pants in the whitehouse? Pelosi, Emanuel?
Democrats over eager to give more money away.
Posted by: seah | November 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Throwing crumbs to the little guy, while they line their own pockets, got to love the democrats.
Work those little minds to keep them obedient.
Posted by: seah | November 9, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
It really annoys me that you naysayers can’t at least wait until he gets in office to bash him.
I really hope he pulls us out of this mess. Then I want to hear all you crybabies whine when you actually have money in your pockets.
He’s not going to do it in a year not even two. As screwed up as this country is from the past 8 years it will take a while to get it back on track.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Curt: yeah, the stock market was doing great before Obama won! Oh…wait a minute…
Posted by: 1bluestocking | November 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
LaFonda: the mortgage rate reduction was McCain’s plan. He wanted to buy up devalued mortgages and have them renegotiated. Not sure where you got the $1,000, credit cards and new car thing. You should get a tax cut, though.
Posted by: 1bluestocking | November 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Gee and I bet the spike in unemployment is Obamas fault too!
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Curt: think again, McCain was opposed to oil drilling. It was ones of his areas of contention with Sarah Palin. Also either candidate’s proposals would have added over $200 billion to the deficit by 2013, not just Obama’s:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/29/fact-check-is-obama-proposing-860-billion-in-new-spending/
Posted by: 1bluestocking | November 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Curt is a GOP windbag. Still spouting lies about Obama, like it will change the election results.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
So, Republicans complained throughout the campaign that Obama was too inexperienced. Now you are complaining that he has chosen someone experienced as Chief of Staff. Make up your minds! Look at it this way. Suppose you took over as CEO of a giant, struggling company. You have major changes to the business plan in mind. Would you draw on the expertise of some key personnel while focusing on the big picture issues? Those insiders have years of information on company departments, competitors, products, etc. Or would you begin by eliminating every past employee, and start over entirely from scratch, just to illustrate your commitment to change? It would waste six months while all the newbies learn the business. Obama has a rare combination: high self-confidence tempered by a knowledge of his own weaknesses. He made a practical choice, which will enable him to get right to work with the assistance of those who already know how the system functions. As he said himself, “I know what I know, and I know what I don’t know.” That sounds simple, but many at high levels lack such self-awareness. I would include “The Decider” in that statement.
Posted by: 1bluestocking | November 9, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
I love how all the neocons, supposedly independents, and republicans are still laying blame for the nastiness to the democrats. I do believe it was the McCain/Palin ticket who resorted to vile, nasty lies during the campaign. And according to most polls, that is why they LOST!
Also, have you noticed how old and used up Bush is looking lately? Lying for eights years takes a toll on ones soul.
Posted by: democratic | November 9, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Posted by: democratic | Nov 9, 2008 9:48:46 PM
I don’t think they have learned a thing and will repeat it again in 4 years. For some reason they just don’t get it.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
I sure wish I had money left in my 401(k) for Obama to take from me. As of last week I have lost a tolal of $100,000 to Bush and his non-existent economic plan. Thank god that friggin’ moron and his party are gone in January. I surely won’t have anything left by then.
Posted by: democratic | November 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Posted by: democratic | Nov 9, 2008 9:55:39 PM
Luckily, I am a Federal employee and I am covered under FERS. I haven’t looked at my TSP account, maybe I should.
I feel for people right now who have 401k’s.
Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
“it is essential that we focus on the stress and strains on the middle class,”
=====
Under our Greatest Leader, 95% of Americans are the middle class that he will take care of.
Down with the evil 5% filthy rich!
Posted by: Coke2 | November 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
democratic,
If Congressional leaders had put the poor and the middle classes first, they would have supported Hilary Clinton’s economic plan, ONE YEAR ago, to use $300 billion to rescue the banking, mortgage and financial crisis. In stead, they were just so happy to support our Greatest Leader who pushed Bush’s “stimulus” to give some of you $600.
You might have been $100,000 richer had HRC got her way.
Posted by: Coke2 | November 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.” Barry Goldwater
“A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor and bread it has earned — this is the sum of good government.” Thomas Jefferson.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | November 10, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am
i see the repubs are still about big business—-want trade agreement with colombia–just what we need more jobs gone out of our country—–they balk at stimulis for people who are having problems heating their homes ,but will give far more again to aig—what the hell is wrong with these people.we cannot get them out soon enough.
Posted by: rodney | November 10, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
George, I like your show and I’m an Obama-fan…but this interview with Rahm Emmanuel was disrespectful to you and your viewers.
I urge readers of this comment to view the video of the entire interview. Rahm failed to answer almost any of your questions…and blatantly so! He was deliberately evasive on virtually every issue. If guests don’t answer your questions, and you’re not going to press them to answer, then why pose questions at all? Maybe you should just let them come on, give their canned spiel and spare us the “interview” charade.
George, it makes you look weak and meek. If guests won’t address your questions, then just look in the camera and say “Well, I guess we’re not going to get a straight answer on this one”. Your guests will eventually get the message that you won’t be “rolled over”.
Posted by: SpinDisorients | November 10, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Obama has taken the wheel of the American Redneck Mini Van. The children are CEO’s, Union Bosses, Army Generals, immigrants, Catholics, and baptists. .Are we there yet? …………
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/11/10/obama-drives-the-american-mini-van/
Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | November 10, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
GREAT POST BRENDA!!!YOU ARE VERY WISE.
I CONCUR WITH EVERYTHING YOU HAVE SAID
HERE.
Posted by: Joyce | November 12, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Obama has a HUGE burdon to carry. Remember one thing before we all go crazy thinking about all the things we don’t agree with and yes I want my stimulus check too! Can you go back to the other day and remember the very moment on television when the new President Elect was anounced? Can you remember the feeling of love and relief? I can and I hope, no I pray he can handle all of the pressure he is under to be true to this promise he has made!
Posted by: sh | November 12, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Let’s all hope GOD doesn’t leave us now. For the next 4 years we will need him more than ever. You do realize that Obama won’t do anything wrong. Everything that doesn’t work out for him will be President Bush’s fault. Mark my words in two years you won’t be able to find hundred people who voted for Obama.
Posted by: Donna | November 15, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Anita Yova – what a statement. i can tell your level of education.
dandle lion – Obama did not promise $1000 per yr from the government.
Posted by: Ro | November 17, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm