Obama ‘Apocalyptic?’
ABC News’ Matt Jaffe reports:
President-elect Obama is still two months away from taking over the Oval Office, but one U.S. cardinal is already having visions of the apocalypse before the abortion-rights-supporting lawmaker’s tenure has even begun.
Cardinal J. Francis Stafford, speaking last Thursday at the Catholic University of America in Washington, denounced Obama’s agenda as "aggressive, disruptive and apocalyptic," as reported by the school newspaper, The Tower.
Stafford, who has worked at the Vatican for 12 years and heads the Apostolic Penitentiary, said that, on Nov. 4, "a cultural earthquake hit America" when Obama was elected, after campaigning on an "extremist anti-life platform.
"He appears to be a relaxed, smiling man. His rhetorical skills, as I mentioned, are very highly developed," Stafford noted.
"But under all of that grace and charm, there is a tautness of will, a clenched jaw, a state of constant alertness, to attack and resist any external influence that might affect his will."
Specifically, Stafford railed against a speech Obama gave July 17, 2007, to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America when the Illinois lawmaker reiterated his support of Roe v. Wade, saying he didn’t want his two daughters, Malia and Sasha, to be "punished by a pregnancy."
However, it should be noted that despite the cardianal’s claim, Obama never made such remarks during his speech to Parenthood Federation of America.
Also last week, as reported here, a South Carolina priest was repudiated for saying Catholic Obama supporters need penance before taking communion, "lest they eat and drink their own condemnation."
One such Catholic Obama supporter would be Vice President-elect Joe Biden. No word on if the Delaware senator has taken any action.
- Matt Jaffe

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Has GWBush been newly appointed as a Cardinal of the US Catholic Church? Scare the holy crap out of the people – that’s what Bush and the Catholics seem most fond of doing. Trouble is, this hellfire preacher came out just a little too late because Obama has already been elected. Then again, maybe that’s his point. Demonize a seemingly decent man like Obama to start the ball of bad mouthing division of American politics. Catholic heirarchy are as bad as any old Bushie now aren’t they?
Posted by: buzziea | November 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
WOW, its really hard to believe that some of these people even read the bible any longer. Their talk is just laced with HATE that you would think they are prosecutors (the meaner ones). Oh well, thank god for my bible. Just imagine if they were the only ones who had access to the Bible and we were all living off their knowledge of it. The possibility sends a cold chill down my spine.
Posted by: Question | November 19, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I am not Catholic and could care less about Cardinal J. Francis Stafford and what he thinks! The Cardinal does not speak for most people. He is however entitled to his opinion.
President-Elect Obama says he feels a woman should have the right to decide whether to have an abortion.
I believe the President-Elect made the correct decision.
Posted by: Shay | November 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
This is supposed to be a democracy, right? So all you folks, whether Catholic or not, can follow your religious doctrines if you choose and allow the rest of us the same right to choose without the fire and brimstone crap. Roe v Wade hasn’t been overturned (yet, thank goodness) and therefore it’s legal. So get off my back. Please.
Posted by: counting crows | November 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Memo to Wacko priests, Say something useful like telling your fellow priets to stop raping little boys. Thank god (if there actually is one) that the wacko’s were defeated in November.
Posted by: Lou | November 19, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
These cardinals and priests should all remain locked up in the vatican and continue praying for all the sins of abuses against mankind. They are not only parlaying into politics, but actively participating in it, using their pulpits to prevent and take away all the rights of women and those who are not even Catholic. They should not have the tax-free status of non-profits and religious institutions any longer for they are now coming out as the second conservative political party.
Posted by: Karen | November 19, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Great so we hate Christans who support Bush and now Catholics who DARE to not support Obama. He’s just a mortal man, he is NOT a religion! Get OVER yourselves!!!
Posted by: hmn | November 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Honey we have survived Bush/Cheney we will be ok. Obama is a lot of things but I fail the see the Anti Christ label fitting him at all. That belonged to Jerry Fallwell as far as I am concerned.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Listen folks,
People should be scared of Mr. Obama if he seriously wants to pass the Freedom of Choice Act. That act would strip away any and all restrictions on abortion. The federal government would fund all abortions without restrictions. 2nd Semester abortions where the live unborn child is dismembered or their hearts pierced with needles for injection of a deadly poison and delivered dead. Catholic hospitals if they want any federal funding would be forced to do abortions. Doctors and nurses with a good moral sense not to participate in abortions would be forced to do so or quit their profession.
Posted by: Lynn Ochs | November 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
I am wondering where was this priest was when little boys were being molested. The fact that he heads the Apostolic Penitentiary(?) tells me that perhaps they have bigger issues than trying to predict what kind of leader President-elect Obama will be. Again, the hate is only given power once I allow it to affect me and that’s just not going to happen!!
Posted by: KayCee | November 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Maybe they should clear up that whole priest-child molestation thingee before they cast stones at others.
It’s not up for anyone to judge another person, I think their bible says that.
Posted by: ha | November 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Still amazing to me how you Dems are all up in arms with Catholic priests but are seemigly alright with BHO sitting in Rev Wright’s church for 20 years.
Posted by: lori | November 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Well, he is right that Obama is always very alert to any threat, unlike W.
But the Catholic church seems to be headed in the same direction it was 500 years ago: irrelevance. At one time, the Pope ruled the Western world; now, no one cares what he says. The Church has discredited itself completely.
When and where did Christ say anything about abortion?
Posted by: Pau | November 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
The real hatred is towards the unborn. The deliberate killing of unborn children and the complete indifference for human life.
The Catholic Church and their leaders stand up for human rights including the unborn.
Posted by: Lynn Ochs | November 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Roman Catholics and Conservative Evangelicals should unite like never before for the upcoming battle to stop the extreme Freedom of Choice Act that Obama has promised Planned Parenthood he will push to enact into law. My guess is and my hope is that enough prolife congressman and Senators will not vote for this wretched bill.
Posted by: Lynn Ochs | November 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Hey ABC what happened to my last posting?
Posted by: Lynn Ochs | November 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Superfluousness?
Posted by: Yawn | November 19, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Yes, thank God there is a God and may he have mercy on all who are for your stand on abortion. The bible does say something about abortion. They are called the Ten Commandments. Abortion falls under the one which says, “Thou Shalt Not Kill”. No wonder this country is in the shape it is in. I can’t believe the comments I have read.
Posted by: Christian | November 19, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I recall pictures of George Bush being greeted by the Pope. George Bush –probably the biggest promoter of the death penalty in this country. I know the Catholic church is against the death penalty, (oh, and the Iraq War), so why would the Pope grant Bush an audience? What was in it for the church?
Posted by: hang | November 19, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Question wrote: “Their talk is just laced with HATE that you would think they are prosecutors (the meaner ones).”
Since when is criticism synonymous with hate? I did not hear one word of hate by Cardinal J. Francis Stafford in that clip. On the other hand, there is definitely a lot of hatred in some of these comments towards Catholics.
Posted by: James Danley | November 19, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Exactly Christian,
Thou shall not kill. How can some people be so callous and indifferent to all the suffering in this world especially what goes on inside those god awful abortion clinics and abortions done at the most pretigious teaching hospitals in this hospital including Chicago Medical where Michelle Obama is a Vice-President.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Earth to A Lot of You Scare-Mongers:
If you don’t want an abortion, don’t get one. Simple, eh? What are you worried about? That you’ll be forced to have one?
Puh-leeze.
Go back into your 17th-century caves and let the rest of the world rotate.
Posted by: SuLee | November 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
“Thou shall not kill. How can some people be so callous and indifferent to all the suffering in this world especially what goes on inside those god awful abortion clinics and abortions done at the most pretigious teaching hospitals in this hospital including Chicago Medical where Michelle Obama is a Vice-President.”
ROFLMAO.
Right wingers treat the ten commandments like shall not kill like they treat the Constitution, only useful when butressing a position otherwise easily ignored.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
oh by they way, hang, I’, glad Saddam Hussein was hanged was executed for his murderous deeds perpetrated on his own people. And George Bush did the right thing by going into Iraq and liberating the people from this dictator. Yes, mistakes were made in prosecuting this war but the surge is working and the Iraqi people know much more freedom now than ever. Digest that for awhile mr. hang
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I have never understood why it is that religious people feel it is there duty to push religion and their personal beliefs on other people. I am not religious, but I also support anyone’s right to be religious, go to church, practice their beliefs in their homes, and pass it on to their children. But why can’t they be happy with that and leave non-religious people alone?
I feel as though religion is a positive influence on many people, but it is also a crutch for people who need that extra boost to accomplish their goals in their lives. I, personally, believe in myself and my own strength to accomplish my goals, without the need for religion. I believe that as human evolution moves forward, religion will be increasingly less important to people.
I believe that religion should bring people together. Unfortunately, religion is more of a seperator, pushing people apart. And this Cardinal’s very public point of view just separates people, including the 56% of Catholics that voted for Obama. Politics and religion should NEVER cross paths, and this Cardinal should just keep all of this to himself if he wants his flock to grow and not shrink.
Posted by: JMan | November 19, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
SuLee, listen it is not ancient backward thought process to stand up for innocent life. Killing the unborn after having sex without being married is what is backward and destructive of the human race in general.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Let’s have a little more “verbal terrorism”—there’s a priest in No. Carolina telling Catholics who supported Obama to refrain from taking communion lest they “eat and drink to their own condemnation.” Now we have a cardinal telling us that Obama’s agenda is “aggressive, disruptive, apoclyptic” and that he campaigned on an “estremist anti-life platform.”
There’s that buzz word “anti-life”. It sits there to evoke terror in the hearts of religious folk everywhere. Just like the letter that came out from Focus on the Family and James Dobson before the election.
All this rhetoric seems to be there to create civil unrest, not to keep the lines of communication open, not to allow for any intelligent dialog, but to pontificate.
The central truth of Scripture is being obliterated by such tactics.
Posted by: George | November 19, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Jman, the cardinal was speaking for the innocent unborn that many times have no advocates. The cardinal speaks for millions of millions of people who respect the unborn. I get so tired of the the destruction. So tired of the culture of death. Just kill without guilt. Kill without consequences. Kill without thought. Kill without compassion. So tired of the indifference to innocent life.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
“oh by they way, hang, I’, glad Saddam Hussein was hanged was executed for his murderous deeds perpetrated on his own people.”
How predictable non pro-life.
Thou shall not kill does not have qualifiers.
“And George Bush did the right thing by going into Iraq and liberating the people from this dictator.”
Now it was liberation from a dictator? The reasons for going to war in iraq have taken on a salad bar feel. Just grab any old rationalization.
“Yes, mistakes were made in prosecuting this war but the surge is working”
Yes only a few hundred Iraqis died last month.
“and the Iraqi people know much more freedom now than ever.”
Hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis are dead. Some directly by the hand of the US military, the rest because of the absolute incompetence of our occupation.
Thank you for perfectly illustration the moral bankruptcy of the right wing.
Abortion is the worst evil ever but war?
That’s all good.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
catholics need to stay inside and deal with there church issues…….. why should america be rules by the pope and vatican..?
catholic church and republicans are living in the past…….. they should all move somewheres and build a wall around themselves…
that way our children will be safe from ped priests and republican politicians….
Posted by: Kracka from S.C. | November 19, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
“I get so tired of the the destruction. So tired of the culture of death.”
And yet this is how you describe a war in which hundreds of thousands have died with many more lives shattered all based on lies told to us by our leaders.
“Yes, mistakes were made in prosecuting this war”
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“SuLee, listen it is not ancient backward thought process to stand up for innocent life”
And yet you are happy with a war where the innocent die.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“I’m tired of your bankrupt morality or better yet not morality.”
Bankrupt morality like cheering for war?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Ryan C man if have been drinking the KoolAid the extreme left. Cool down man. Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Remmember dude? Hussein flew Scud missiles to Israel. Hussein was building an nuclear facility that the Israeli Air Force took out. He would have tried to do these things again if he ever got to change to build up his army again with oil money. He was a menace to the region. He was the Adolf Hitler of our time dude.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“Killing the unborn after having sex without being married is what is backward and destructive of the human race in general.”
You do realize, Lynn, that your description of the cause of abortion is incorrect, incomplete, and ridiculously naive, don’t you?
Posted by: hang | November 19, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Lynn Ochs – So?
Posted by: hang | November 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
American soldiers did not behead innocent teachers in front of their students. American soldiers did not bury whole families alive in ditches. American soldiers did not have Kurds and Sunnis dig their own graves and then have Hussein’s soldiers shoot them point blank in the back of their heads.
American soldiers did not set off bombs in marketplaces that blew up innocent children to bits. The carnage so ugly American TV doesn’t show it.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. Hussein flew Scud missiles to Israel.”
In 1991 which is why we had the Gulf War.
Before that Saddam was our buddy so we provided him with chemical weapons and logistic support in the war against Iran.
“Hussein was building an nuclear facility that the Israeli Air Force took out.”
Yes in 1982.
“He would have tried to do these things again if he ever got to change to build up his army again with oil money. He was a menace to the region”
He was a completely emasculated shell of a threat. His army was a joke and his WMD program non-existent.
Inspectors found nothing and instead of keeping up inspection, Bush went to war costing 4000 American military personell their lives to say nothing of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
Yet as someone who claims sanctity of life as paramount you cheer this war on and justify it.
There’s a word for that and its start with h and ends with y.
Not surprising.
Religious people are some of the most wonderful people on the planet.
Unfortunately they get lumped in with right wingers who use religion to justify their hatred and fear.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“American soldiers did not behead innocent teachers in front of their students. American soldiers did not bury whole families alive in ditches. American soldiers did not have Kurds and Sunnis dig their own graves and then have Hussein’s soldiers shoot them point blank in the back of their heads.
American soldiers did not set off bombs in marketplaces that blew up innocent children to bits. The carnage so ugly American TV doesn’t show it.”
So Iraqis deserve to die? Is that what you are saying Lynn?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Ryan C.
Should we be so indifferent to the Iraqi people to all their suffering during the Saddam Hussein days. Indifferent to the terror that they felt everyday, the secret police, the knock on the door?
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Apocalyptic? Good question but it is directed at the wrong person. The Bush years have done more apocalyptic damage. Let me count the ways: thousands killed and maimed here and abroad in the “war on terror”, pollution increased on earth due to wars and no support from the U.S.; poverty at home and abroad is on the increase; financial terror across the world, corruption at the corporate-capitalistic level increased. Just add to the list at will.
If an unwanted birth is terminated due to lack of family support, money or love then old men in the church need to find a way to feed, clothe, educate and nurture them. The Vatican should take responsibility for unwanted, unloved and undereducated children in the world. Until they do, they have no idea what is involved in child rearing in a modern world.
Posted by: NParr | November 19, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
The Iraqi people were suffering awfully under the UN sanctions. Thank god that is over now. The terror from the Saddam Hussein murderous regime and the poverty and degradation under the UN sanctions. The fraudulent dealing and money laundering and black marketing in those days. It was quite awful and not sustainable.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Catholic charities and love have helped countless poor people. including Mother Teresa.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“Should we be so indifferent to the Iraqi people to all their suffering during the Saddam Hussein days. Indifferent to the terror that they felt everyday, the secret police, the knock on the door?”
The Iraqi people worst suffering under Saddam was during the 80′s and shortly after the Gulf War.
In establishing his regime he killed thousands of political rivals. Later he went after the Kurds. Post Gulf War he may have killed 150,000 Shia.
The 80′s were when Saddam enjoyed the largess of the United States under Reagan, guess human rights weren’t such a priority.
So should the US militarily intervene based on human rights or national security, Lynn?
Should we invade North Korea? Congo? Sudan?
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“Catholic charities and love have helped countless poor people. including Mother Teresa.”
Yes they do. And Catholics who actually observe their religion are true pro-lifers in that they are against abortion, the death penalty and war.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Lynn, I deeply respect your opinion, however I do not believe that the Cardinal was speaking for the “unborn,” but rather was making a political point. Abortion is legal under the law. The Cardinal disagrees with that, but to link abortion with a vote for Obama is just short-sighted on his part.
Catholics are overwhelmingly anti-abortion, yet 56% of Catholics who voted this time around voted for Obama. To say that people who voted for Obama are therefore pro-abortion is not correct. Larger issues (larger to them) were at stake to these voters, and after weighing all of the facts they voted for Obama, not for abortion.
This is one of the reasons why I never understood why the GOP’s “base” cares more about social issues than non-social issues. Anti-abortion, anti-gun laws, pro-religion in schools — these are all issues that hardcore GOP’ers vote on, yet have nothing to do with the issues that elected officials confront on a daily basis, like healthcare, fiscal responsibility, foreign affairs, etc… Heck, “W” was the most religious-friendly President we have had in a long time, and yet for all of his talk he did very little to help the causes of the religious right.
The ABSOLUTE LAST THING I want to have is an abortion debate. I sincerely respect your opinion and your beliefs. But that is what they are — opinion and beliefs. If we knew that first-term abortion was actually killing a life, which we don’t, then it would obviously be illegal and I would support that. But passing laws based on religious beliefs is extremely dangerous, and this is one of those cases. Like I said, mixing religion with politics is never a good idea, and should be avoided. And I just can’t believe that a bunch of men — Cardinals or not — know what is best for a woman better than women know what is best for themselves.
Posted by: JMan | November 19, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Stafford…no credibility.
Posted by: Ed | November 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Well, Bill Clinton didn’t intervene in Ruwanda in the 80′s and hundreds of thousands of people were butchered by machete while the world watched. Bill Clinton didn’t do anything for the longest time while fighting impeachment about Bosnia while Serbians, Bosnians and Croatians were butchering each other and hundreds of thousands of innocents lives were lost. And people in in Sarevyo were shot on the streets by Serbian snipers.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Jman, I know you do not want a debate on abortion but hear me out with this please. I will be direct.
Were you not an embryo and a 1st semester fetus? Were you not human? What logic are you using? It is not religious to say a 1st semester fetus is not human. It is medical. Now how about the 2nd semester as the fetus is growing more advanced and closer to birth. Were you not a 2nd semester fetus? Were you not human? What logic are you using? If you were human as an embryo, 1st semester fetus and a 2nd semester fetus shouldn’t we have had compassion for you when you were growing in your mother’s womb. Should not all growing fetuses also deserve compassion and not indifference?
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Now also, a good number of people including Catholics voting for Obama do not realize how extreme the man is on the abortion issue.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Now, abortion kills a life. If left to grow and left alone by the abortionist doctor chances are the fetus would grow into be a neonate, walla a BABY. Yes I said it, a baby. A newborn.
Posted by: Lynn | November 19, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Sigh.
I love how people use “thou shalt not kill” as an argument against abortion and then have no problem with the fact that we killed a significant number of Iraqis.
I didn’t realize there were exceptions. Thou shalt not kill, except if you think the person you’re killing is really bad or you’re in danger or you feel threatened or by accident because the person got in the way of someone who you believe deserved to be killed…
Please.
Posted by: johnTX | November 19, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I do believe the Catholic Church should lose its non-profit status if it involves itself in political matters. Separation of Church and State!
Posted by: Shirley | November 19, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
hahahahaha, Cardinal. Abortions for everyone!! Party time!!!
Posted by: DKNY | November 19, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Roman Catholics and Evangelicals unite? Ha.
Thirty years ago any Catholic having been seen in another church was excommunicated. Catholics still believe Evangelicals are following a bastardized form of the true teachings. Not only that, but there’s a good number that believe Evangelicals will go to hell.
Posted by: johnTX | November 19, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Lynn: Just exactly what is a miscarriage? Some have called it a “natural” abortion. Just asking.
As horrific as Saddam Hussein was to his people, our initial reason for going in was WMDs. It was not to punish him for his misdeeds to his people.
You said Clinton didn’t go into Africa in the 80s—Clinton wasn’t president in the 80s. You also might recall that the Republicans were so opposed to President Clinton that they couldn’t do anything but try to destroy his presidency by any means.
I still have to ask, when does this mass of cells become a living being. That is a matter of faith. Is it a living being when there is a miscarriage? Is it a living being only at the point of having the “breath of life?”
Now we see through a glass darkly, but then face to face says the Apostle Paul.
Posted by: George | November 19, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
It would do my heart a great deal of good if various religious sects and leaders would stop trying to legislate from the pulpit. There a myriad of excellent reasons to maintain a high wall of separation between church and state, and this is a prime example.
Posted by: Yukon Sam | November 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I am a Catholic but I don’t care much about the political opinion of these wacko cardinals.
It took 400 years for the Pope to apologize for the Church’s role in the slavery.
Where was this fool when thousands of innocent Irakis were being killed? Talk about double standard.
Posted by: tchanta | November 19, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Secular and people of faith that believe that we need to more rigorously enforce the seperation of church and state should unite to keep these zealots out of politics and legislation. I was raised Catholic. Thank god I knew those priests were always full of it.
Posted by: Steve | November 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I have yet to understand, how anyone could be part of the roman catholic church,considering there most un-godly past. I mean from slavery to assisting Hitler in his slaughter of the Jews.
The accepted rape and molestation of innocent children by men of god they believed they could trust, and then upon finding out,those same men being sent to other church’s instead of being turned over to be prosecuted by the law.
The blessing the church has given to warmongers like G.W.Bush.
so much death and chaos that the church has not spoken against.
Yet the black man becomes president, and all of the sudden the moral fiber of America is unraveling.The world is coming to an end. And the church has had enough,finally an issue worth speaking out against.
What hypocrites, makes me sick to my stomach.
I can except Obama going to the Church of Rev,Wright,because unlike most I bothered to do a little research about the man deemed the antichrist. And thru that I came to understand that his sermons over the last 20 years,weren’t all filled with hate. I also understood why a man that served his country with honor could carry a certain disdain for a country that treated his people like animals.
I’m sure many Jews around the world, have the same disdain and disgust for Germany.
Posted by: My Grandfather Bled for his Rights. | November 19, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
How would anyone pretend to know what’s underneath “all that grace and charm”?
Obama carried the Catholic vote by 9%. The “Boys” must really feel threatened if they’re engaging in this kind of over-the-top rhetoric already.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 19, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
I think this Cardinal’s words are evil, but I’m glad the 1st Amendment protects his right to be the disingenuous fool that he is.
Posted by: Rich | November 19, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
As a Catholic, I really don’t get statements like these.
I voted for Obama and it seems to me that he looks at the abortion issue from a pragmatic side. Roe v. Wade is not going to be overturned but at the same time he said we should do all we can to reduce the number of abortions.
Posted by: cincyr | November 19, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
I agree w/Obama’s view on abortion. BUT I agree with the Cardinal on the idea that Obama’s “rhetorical skills….are very highly developed”. Obama had some serious speech training, he can mesmerize a crowd, using hypnotic phrases. Just listen for SOMETHING that he really says in his speeches- other than “hope, change, yes we can, hope, change” there is no substance to his messaging.
BEWARE- OBAMA is a WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING.
Posted by: BK | November 20, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
I am very happy that the Church is standing up for goodness, decency and common sense on this issue.
American doctors have now murdered 20-30 million innocent children in the name of convenience – children who deserved to live to become people with the “right to choose” how they would live their lives.
Comparatively, Germans killed 6 million under Hitler, and yet we condemn them without looking in the mirror at our own glaring crime.
Thank you Cardinal Stafford for your courage. Thank you for standing up to an increasingly blind mob – a mob that is growing more selfish, close-minded and dangerous.
Americans, please look into your own hearts. Some once believed that great evil could never happen in a civilized society like Germany. It did, and it can happen here in America. Killing is killing, no matter how others fool you into thinking otherwise. Please wake up before it’s too late to turn around, and before we become the next Nazi Germany.
Posted by: Venator | November 20, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
The “it just happened” defense has never held any weight with me. On the whole, women know when they’re going to have sex. Ladies, if you plan on having sex and you do not want to get pregnant use some form of birth control-Catholic or not.
Posted by: Kathy | November 20, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
It seems to me that people who get in this discussion don’t want to discuss these questions. They just want to pontificate.
How did a woman get an abortion before it was legalized? Or do you believe that abortions did not exist before Roe v. Wade?
Why would a woman get an abortion?
What can be done to reduce the number of abortions?
What is so wrong about birth control that some religious forbid it? Does it have something to do with the belief that the only purpose for sex is to create another human being? That seems to be the argument used against same sex relationships.
Posted by: George | November 20, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
re: “American doctors have now murdered 20-30 million innocent children ”
so why, … if the Church is so concerned about preventable death…….aren’t ‘they’ railing against the tobacco industry and the myriad of illness and death they produce ?
Posted by: K in S.C. | November 20, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Wow, so is he going to with hold communion from all of the Catholic Soldiers that come back from Iraq?
Is he going to with hold communion from prison guards and officials who impose the death penalty?
Is he going to with hold communion from doctors that take patients off of life support due to being in a chronic vegetative state?
Is he going to with hold communion from doctors who perform research using embryonic stem cells?
This is a complex issue, I agree. But it’s not as simple as Kathy’s advice:
“The “it just happened” defense has never held any weight with me. On the whole, women know when they’re going to have sex. Ladies, if you plan on having sex and you do not want to get pregnant use some form of birth control-Catholic or not.”
Kathy-Sometimes people use birth control, and it doesn’t work! Sometimes people use condoms, and they break!
George- I will answer some questions for you:
It seems to me that people who get in this discussion don’t want to discuss these questions. They just want to pontificate.
How did a woman get an abortion before it was legalized? Or do you believe that abortions did not exist before Roe v. Wade?
Answer: Women either had illegal or self-induced abortions, and they sometimes died from infection, bled to death, and other atrocious complications. (Hence, Roe V Wade)
Why would a woman get an abortion? Answer: Contrary to the Pro-Life belief-Women are not excited or happy about getting abortions! Ususally, this is a very diffcult decision and most women that chose to do this feel that they have no other option. Topr reasons why a woman would chose to have an abortion if she 1. Became pregnant even though she used birth control 2. Was raped, or is in an abusive relationship 3. There is a health risk to the mother or child if carried to term
What can be done to reduce the number of abortions?
If schools (starting in 6th grade) had more informative sex-education courses that gave children & teens IN DEPTH information about sex, STDs, pregnancy, and child development, there would be less unwanted pregnancies. If sex-ed teachers were allowed to give out contraceptives, and referrals to Pl. Parenthod, there would be a lot less unwanted pregnancies.
What is so wrong about birth control that some religious forbid it? Does it have something to do with the belief that the only purpose for sex is to create another human being? YES
That seems to be the argument used against same sex relationships.
Posted by: Julie | November 20, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Obama is the president for all the people, not just the catholics. Here in America we also have Mormons, Jews,Jehova Witnesses,Eckists,Budhists,Christians, Muslims, Pagans, Democrats, and Gays.
Posted by: Jamil | November 20, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Couldn’t have said it better myself, Cardinal Stafford. Thank you for your Christ-like courage.
May the Mother of God protect us as we expose evil and beg people to turn away from the culture of DEATH.
Posted by: Teresa | November 20, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Thank you, Julie!
I agree with you. I posed those questions because I think they are important in putting things in perspective.
A cousin, who is in her 80s and a retired supervising and teaching nurse in Kansas told the family one evening some time ago that they might change their minds on the abortion issue if they ever had to deal with a woman who had had a botched back alley abortion.
When I was in High School Religion class the time abortion came up was to discuss the possibility in the case of choosing to save either the mother or the fetus—the class was split.
The issue is too complex to be “solved” with sound bites.
Posted by: George | November 20, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm