Obama Cabinet: Mix of Star Power, Brain Power, and Political Muscle

So where’s the CHANGE????
All these people are politicians who are Washington insiders. No surprise–we know he owes favors to everybody.
He could have at least picked some brilliant economist out of the Wharton School or some other institution who would focus on the economy and not his political possibilities. We need fresh people, not these worn-out, used-up, did-nothing-so-far people.
I knew his CHANGE was a big lie to get elected. Four more years of the same old shiX.

“I knew his CHANGE was a big lie to get elected. Four more years of the same old shiX”.
What a crock of B.S. Change also means not kissing the NeoCons and big business Arses. Let a man get to work Jan 20th. God knows we have had 8 years of a Mama’s baby boy who has screwed the pooch while the blithering idiot NeoCons drooled and smiled.

It’s SO nice to have Jimmay Carter back in the White House. I mean NOBODY has done more to help improve the countries standing overseas and financially than than helplees little man Jimmy Carter (er. Barack Obama) Folks do a little research into what the 70′s was like, compare that to today and what Obama is proposing. Tell me with a straight face and without laughing that isn’t the case after a long examination. If you are intellectually honest with yourself, if now one else, you will see the folly of what is to come over the next four years. Bush was brought in to create this mess, Obama was put in to finish us off! Isn’t it nice how bipartisan our politicians can be when they benefit off of the backs of our labor. Just think what could happen if WE had controll over our money and NOT Washington DC!!!

Firstly, 9 out of 10 of the idiots posting criticisms about the perceived lack of “Change” never supported Obama in the first place…so all of those who are currently posturing as if they were somehow betrayed by false promises during the campaign can…how should I say…suck it, basically. Change is about improvement, not wholesale reversals. Keep what works, change what doesn’t…it’s so simple even a child can grasp it easily. And yet there’s a parade of bitter detractors (losers) that will persist with these moronic charges. Maybe change is about competence and sound judgement. Maybe change is about ideology. Best yet, maybe change is, and should be, about results, and it’s too early to pass judgement on that yet. But even if that change, the real, important change, comes, some jackass will still be complaining that Obama still puts his pants on one leg at a time just like everyone else and how can that be change? Maybe if Obama filled his cabinet with complete unknowns (no experience or demonstrated competence required), and then have everyone walk on their hands…

Good morning to you mr george, I watch your program every sunday mornning, I like it because you tell’s it like it is,Now I hare about Balling the banks out? well who is going to ball we elder older peoples out? when the overdraft charges as high as they are,do you know that if we be overdrafted for the amount of Just $1.00. we be charged the sum of $35.00? Plus a $8.00 a day until our next check come on the 3rd of each month? I have a friend of mine whole check was taken one month for a overdraft of $5.00, because he could not pay it off before the next check day which was on the 3rd of each month,Now if the banks is all that broke, well where is all of that money going?
Thank you
Joseph Rosenthal
Josephrosental@sbcglobal.net

NMSands:
No one needs a brain surgery to understand what it means by “CHANGE”. The meaning of it is not to bring new faces. It is quite simple; do it differently.
No one can bring the real change if they do not understand what they are doing,
I salute our Pres. elect Obama, he is moving on the right path. He is appointing very experienced people and with no doubt they are going to deliver.
Open your eyes widely and watch the “CHANGE” coming. Its going to happen.. Trust me and him!

Scintillating commentary princess phillip.

I am 50 years old and I have not seen or heard people say, “someone for the people is finally in office.” Now having said that, the events of the day will dictate much how what Obama will or will not be able to do. I haven’t seen people (black and white) this excited since JFK.

So many of you are clamboring “Where’s change, Where’s change??!!??”
Well duhhhh. The Change is here in this article. Competence over ideology. Quality over congruence. Discussion over division. Educated strength over monolithic power. Look, ya yutzes, change doesn’t necessarily mean untested, unproven, flashy, take-a-wild-chance ventures that have little hope of success. Often change means a shift of direction toward more well-thought-out alternatives. If you’re expecting Mohammed-from-the-mountain-top revelation, get over it. Enjoy a new experience with the presidency: thoughtful competence.

“Look, ya yutzes, change doesn’t necessarily mean untested, unproven, flashy, take-a-wild-chance ventures that have little hope of success.”
Strange – That is exactly what the country voted for on Nov 4th.

Great. The real CHANGE is coming to Washington. It is a combination of Star Power and Brain power. These people will do everything to get us out of this econnomics mess and move in the right directions and the best way forward.
Yes, it’s the Change we can believe in.

It’s so comforting to know that barry is surrounding himself with people far more qualified then he is to run this country.

I should think the OUTCOME of bringing together familiar faces is the change we should seek. After all, what would total new-comers to the scene do? It takes those who knOw what happened, when, and how to fix it. Needless to say, there are some bright new minds out there. But, in the current mess we’re in, it’s no time for experiments. He can do that later.

Of course he is reaching out and recruiting talented and experienced people. Change is not about assembling a team of novices and rookies! That would not only be irresponsible, but downright crazy. Change comes from attitude. Change comes from direction. Change comes from the tone set by the leader. Change comes from a philosophy of leadership. Change does not come from a bunch of rookies!

William J. LePetomaine
Wow… you have been drinking the kool-aid for a looooong time.
yes we can give out more entitlements
yes we can have a peace pipe with ahkmandenijead
yes we can spread the wealth around
yes we can follow barry O right off a cliff…

liberalshateamerica: your name shows your ignorance of US History. Liberal Democrats got women the vote. Liberal Democrats created Social Security. Liberal Democrats got the 8-hour work day. Liberal Democrats passed the Civil Rights Act. Liberal Democrats created the New Deal. Liberal Democrats worked us out of the Great Depression with legislation and programs. Liberal Democrats passed equal opportunity for the disabled. Liberal Democrats ended the war in Vietnam. GET A CLUE!

William J. LePetomaine
Liberals like Lyndon Johnson? A VERY outspoken racist who only passed the legislation because he had to.
Or how about George Wallace, the most notorious segregationist ever.
What about Byrd, he was a real winner.
Liberal policies of entitlements extended the depression to last 10 years when the market could have worked itself out in 2.
You want credit for the new deal- you can have it!
Republicans have Martin Luther King and Abe Lincoln in our corner. Looking back, I don’t even recognize what the dems used to be “ask not what your country can for you but rather…….” has turned into barry’s “spread the wealth around” entitelment socialist policies.
Change is a comin!

I have to say, this bit is priceless.. especially when coming from an Obamabot.
“Who the heck would want a learning curve right now – when this country is a mess? We need smart, experienced people. Not ivy tower blowhards, but people who know how to get things done.”
- soapboxmom
This is what the educated half of the country was saying BEFORE the election.. but you didn’t listen then and voted for Obama anyway.

am i right fdr 1933-1945 things really didnt get any better until 1940 when we started to supply and finance our allies and then 1941 men(mostly white then)left for war this created huge gaps in the workforce and also this let blacks and women more into factorys and got americas war machine working more jobs filled more people working more money in taxes being paid and im not to sure but wasnt the workforce created by fdr becouse they had no welfare foodstamps ssi wic they rationed i believe what a concept

Dear George,
Do you have any idea what will be the role of John Carry?
with regards
Alex

Not being an American, I may not quite understand what change means to Americans. But I think change does not necessarily mean changing people. In fact, changing people does not really matter if ideas and methodology do not change. I think the Obama change really involves changing the way things are done in Washington, changing ideas and not necessarily changing people. In any case, the Obama team is not the Bush team so even there, change is really coming to America. There is also a big change in doing things – surely.

And now some budget facts for our hateful “saltine” buddies like iamready who think America is screwed because a poor child of color might get a meal or a vacciantion at the state/nation’s expense:
According to The Budget for Fiscal Year 2008, Historical Tables, total outlays for Means Tested Entitlements in 2006 were $354.3 billion. This was 2.7% of GDP and includes Medicaid, food stamps, family support assistance (AFDC), supplemental security income (SSI), child nutrition programs, refundable portions of earned income tax credits (EITC and HITC) and child tax credit, welfare contingency fund, child care entitlement to States, temporary assistance to needy families, foster care and adoption assistance, State children’s health insurance and veterans pensions. If we exclude Medicaid, health care for children and veterans pensions it is 0.89 % of GDP, or $117 billion. This represents approximately 7.5% of total non-Social Security receipts to the Federal Government. So, for every one of your tax dollars to the Federal Government, about 7.5 cents goes to these programs. The average taxpayer had a tax rate of 12.45% in 2005, so if we multiply things out we see that about 0.93% of the average taxpayer’s income went to non-medical “welfare”. Meanwhile the US budget for Iraq in FY 2007 came to 4,988/Iraqi. This is triple Iraq’s per-person GDP. It’s like spending $121,000 per person ($484,000 per family of 4) in the US.
DO YOU GET IT NOW? That’s right, some brother’s rims and cell phone didn’t ruin our economy as you are so fond of thinking you simple-minded, hateful rube.

What a bunch of sour grapes and sore losers. The majority of Americans voted and chose Barack Obama to be our next President – period. Get over it.

THANK YOU LIBERALSHATEAMERICA

“Get over it, you lost. We democrates got over it when GW and his Carl Rove cronies stole the votes in 2000 and by the grace of God we survived, bearly.”
Yet another whining crying liberal….8 yrs later…still whining….
He won…PERIOD…Same as Obama Won!
This is what i mean by liberals alwyas always living by “DO ASI SAY, NOT AS I DO”
They want support for Obama, but even now 8 years later they are “claiming” Bush “stole” the election!
1. If that buffoon you put up for a candidate could have won his OWN STATE. He would have won! Why not ask how a guy who wants to be president can’t even carry his own state and then his supporters whine about the outcome for a friggin decade!
2. Thank God Bush did WIN. I want to throw up every time I think of a President Gore being in power on 9/11/01. It owuld have taken that fool a week to figure out his first response after needing at least 25 polls so he would know what to say & do.
3. Yuo dont have to like Bush at all, but every single American owes him a big Thank You for keeping this country safe ever since that day!

See the bad losers are out in force again.

After the way Hillary and George ambushed Obama in that debate, I’m SURE there will be no cabinet position for Georgie. At least Hillary got on board in the end, and I have forgiven her all of her transgressions. I’m absolutely certain she will be a great Secretary of State! :)

i guess i can go out there, have 8 babies, 8 baby daddies and ofcourse the gov, will spread the wealth around.COOL AID DRINKERS GO GET A JOB.

I’m thrilled at the return of intellectualism and sound political practice. There’s politics that’s good for society and politics that’s bad for society. Obama’s brand of politics is the right way to lead this nation forward to the benefit of the average American. We can only get there by conducting politics in a manner of greater unity and forethought. There will certainly exist conflicting interests, but if we can all get into this boat together and find ways to negotiate win-win outcomes rather than winner take all scenarios, then we’re simply more efficient at progress.
Obama by taking in a former rival is not simply paying back those he owes. OK, he’s doing that too. Regardless, this is good for all of us. With this he is diffusing tensions among those that supported Clinton for being Hillary or for being a woman. It’s also an olive branch to the Sarah Palin believers. This also enables synergies. This team is greater than the sum of its parts.
The Bush team was actually worse than any single individual could have been on his or her own; quite amazing.
McCain may not have been too bad a president; better than Bush (fairly easy to do). But Obama is clearly the best politician in a lifetime. And he is not just the best himself. Regan (may he rest in peace), was better at self-promotion. But instead, he is the best politician for the country during any times, whether we are looking for change or not. This is the kind of president we need, consistently, regardless of the sway of the economy.
Republican campaign scare tactics were not enough to overcome the writing on the wall: THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION HAD TO GO. Of course, Obama really won because of the economy, which is only 10% Bushes fault. The other blame we can pass around liberally among the private sector, Republicans, Democrats, Joe Six-pack and even OPEC (why not?).
So even though we as a country only lucked out in electing this next greatest president because the economy happens to be bad in November of an election year, we did it. And that’s what matters.

He said:”We need to change from the old and tired Washington policies”…and never said what would be the new policies. He said:”We need a tax system that is fair to the hard working American families”…but never said what changes to the existing system would be made. He said:”We need to get our troops out of Irak now”…but never said how he would accomplished it.
Yesterday he was asked about removing the Bush tax breaks and what other steps he would take to straighten out the economy and he answered: “I’m waiting to get a recommendation from my economic team”…..Good grief!
Change we can believe in? I guess I’m already changing my opinion about THAT ONE.

Star power? Maybe. Brain power? Thats questionable. Stephanopoulos, what planet are you living on?

I am sorry I ever voted for Obama, he’s an idiot.

Where’s my Obama check? Why am I still paying my own bills?

I am an Afro American that voted for McCain/Palin and am truly offended by several of these blogs. The truth is that neither candidate was worthy of my vote but since I am conservative- I made my choice. Every that is not an IDIOT knows that neither one of these candidates can single handed fix this mess. Also, you know that no single person or party got us to this point. It was the combined STUPIDITY AND GREED of BOTH LYING parties.

Armand
“We can only hope that these facts and those pointed out in the post by LIBERALSHATEAMERICA are properly acknowledged by civil rights advocates, historians and the national press and other media.”
Although I share your hope, I think it must be acknowledged that LIBERALS write most of history. That is why for my entire high school, and most of my college career, I was told of the horrible man Joe McCarthy who terrorized innocent people in the 50′s.
My professors claimed that these poor people, accused of being communists working for Moscow during the cold war, by McCarthy had ruined reputations from false accusations (never mind that many of these accused communists were immedietly offered speaking/ teaching positions at many of our ivy league schools).
It was not until brave liberals stood up to this tyrant McCarthy that all was well again. However,it was not until 1995 that the Venona project exposed hundreds of spies working DIRECTLY for Roosevelt and Truman. Documents show that both presidents were warned and neither did anything other than simply laugh off the charges.
THIS IS THE DANGER WE FACE WHEN WE LET LIBERALS WRITE OUR HISTORY BOOKS. DID YOU KNOW THAT THEY HAVE ALREADY BEGUN WIPING OUT TEACHING ABOUT THE HOLOCAUST IN EUROPE’S SCHOOLS TO SO AVOID OFFENDING MUSLIMS…VERY FRIGHTENING

So where’s the change? Obama is breaking every single campaign promise he has made. But the scary thing is that George here still has his head up Obama’s @ss and is not willing to ask the tough questions.

rand1a8,
other then what the liberal media has been serving you in the form of kool-aid, which you have OBVIOUSLY been chugging for the past 8 years, please tell me how Bush has screwed anything up?
My biggest complaint with him is that he was not hard enough on the robin hood, socialist, democrats who are always trying to shove entitlements into the mouths of their base. Barney Frnak, chris dodd, chuck shcumer, and of course barry’s favorite group of community agitators, ACORN.

Good MORNING..
I just have a quick observation.. Why does it seem that republicans are the only one that seem to be bitter or angry?? Is it because the candidate they voted (or rather didnt vote) for LOST the election? NO..can’t be..because they were angry during the campaign. Could it be that they hate the way the Repubs have treated them and the rest of the country and just don’t want to admit it? Possibly.
It just amaze me how republicans have nothing else to say other than..”where is the change?” “when will i get my rebate?” ..everything they complained about during the election..they are now asking for..be through sarcasim. I’m sure if they rec’d a check back or any benefit from the Obama Admin..they would be the first one to cash in on it.
To all REPUBS..JUST LET IT GO.. LET GO OF THE ANGER!

For the record, I didn’t vote for him. He isn’t what I wanted to see in the White House. (e.g. a Democrat)
Other than scaring the crud out of me with what he considers necessary changes for America….I was just wondering, who was it that told this guy that every change ‘the people’ want is always good?
I guess this falls under the “be careful what you wish for” umbrella.

WOW, ABC is really into censorship now. Long live the Free Media!
My remark: Oh yes, it’s just BRILLIANT to tap the governor of the poorest state in the Union — the one with MORE PEOPLE on welfare than any other state — the one with no infrastructure and with “the mordida” (Mexican bribery system) — the one with the lowest pay — for Secretary of COMMERCE. LOL.

My comment should have be directed towards “dave.” I apoligize to “only repubs.”

I was having diner with a friend who has cable. Their was a news conference with President elect Obama. I supported John McCain who I respect, we will always have him to thank for Sarah Palin who has breathed life into a hide bound Republican Party. Obama made an excellent case for his plans for the future, but, I don’t recall hearing anything about private enterprise.

The Capitalist Dictatorship Falsifies Basic Science!
Michio Kaku, Wendy Freedman, Dennis Oberbye,
Brian Greene, etc. Exposed as Liars!
Today basic medicine, science including climatology, astrophysics and even both Einstein’s Special Theory and General Theory of relativity are brazenly and routinely falsified at the direction of Fascist elements for political/religious reasons. These scientifically fabricated and bizarre distortions are mixed in with some actual science and are passed of as “the new science” in exhaustive falsifications lasting for hours on NOVA, FRONTLINE and the so-called “History Channel,” not to mention the new textbooks! Can you say Total Brainwash of the youth? Not to mention the adult population! The widespread genuine academic opposition to these wide-scale falsifications of science is never given equal time! We demand and will take some time to refute the U.S.-led capitalist dictatorship’s lies.
The Capitalist Dictatorship’s Attempt to Falsify the
Age of the Universe to Help Provide False Belief in “god”
The capitalists have tried to falsify the actual age of the Universe and the infinite cycle of a Big Bang followed by a Big Crunch, meaning a closed rather than an open Universe, because the reality of a closed Universe does not fit with the religious brainwash of a single creation and belief in a supernatural fictitious “god.” (The statecraft of capitalism’s alliance with religion and belief in “god” and other superstition is exposed further below.) The reality is that the process of contraction of the Universe begins soon after the Big Bang, which begins the process of expansion. The process of contraction began with the first condensations of gas after the Big Bang. At first the process of expansion is dominant, but the processes of expansion and contraction exist simultaneously from shortly after the Big Bang until finally the process of contraction becomes dominant and all galactic matter is finally drawn into Supermassive Black Holes, which today form the centers of all spiral galaxies and elliptical galaxies in the process of becoming spiral galaxies. These Supermassive Black Holes, which are growing larger continuously, finally link up all existing matter of the Universe finally at one spot in the Big Crunch, at which time critical mass in the true and ultimate sense is reached for another Big Bang Cycle and the beginning of another Universe. The critical mass density required for the Big Crunch to occur is 1 x 10 to the negative 29th of a gram per cubic centimeter (approximately 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter), according to the calculation from the General Theory of Relativity. Neutrinos are now known to have mass which may be sufficient to supply the “missing mass.” (See below.) But probably even more significant is the recent paper in Science, November 21, 2008 which shows that 95% of matter in the Universe exists in the form of energy according to Einstein’s formula E=mc2. This relationship would reverse in a Black Hole and the so-called “missing mass” would gradually appear as the contraction of the Universe allowed the energy-mass relationship to shift so that in a practical and real sense it would be solved for m=E/c2. Though the authors of the paper fail to draw this conclusion that is the inescapable significance of those papers. See below. The fact that the expansion and contraction of the Universe occur simultaneously is one more example of the Law of Unity of Opposites, the Second Law of and Historical Materialism and the correctness of the scientific philosophy of Dialectical and Historical Materialism, as opposed to the false philosophies of idealism and metaphysics, which are the only philosophies permitted to be seriously taught in U.S. colleges and universities, and which form the underlying basis for all phony “cosmological” theory! See further below!
Back Holes Have Mass and a Size Which
Can Be Calculated and Rotate on an Axis!
In addition, in the Big Crunch matter most certainly does NOT collapse to “a single point less than the size of a single molecule,” a totally ridiculous assertion by the so-called “string theorists” (see below) designed to try to discredit the Theory of the Big Bang/Big Crunch Cycle of the Universe. Black Holes are formed exclusively of condensed nuclear material; protons and neutrons (composed of quarks) and electrons (composed of leptons) devoid of their orbits and all motion, all collapsed together. The end point of all matter in the Big Crunch is a Single Black Hole, the so-called “singularity.” All Black Holes have the same mass density which is said to be infinite, but which is no smaller than the mass of all combined nuclear material from all stars or gas contained in the Black Hole as explained above. The only difference is the difference in mass. Please note that while some of the information provided below may appear to be somewhat technical it is necessary for any subsequent challenges which might be made of this dialectical an historical materialist analysis. An educated reader should be able to understand most of it and follow for the most part the explanations which follow, which have in turn have vast political implications. A few key references are provided and the reader can research the area independently.
Black Holes have mass and size just as neutron stars (pulsars) also have mass!! All Black Holes, both Stellar Black Holes and Supermassive Black Holes (the result of combination of millions of solar masses) which form the center of evolving elliptical galaxies and all spiral galaxies, also rotate extremely rapidly just like neutron stars, some of which are estimated to be only 8 to 20 miles in diameter, and rotate in 1.4 milliseconds to 30 seconds! All stars rotate on a central axis to some degree due to the angular momentum of gas approaching the center of the proto-star prior to the ignition of hydrogen fusion. In other words the gravitational collapse of gas in star formation is not uniform just as its opposite, an explosion such as the Big Bang is not uniform. When the radius of the star is reduced drastically in stellar collapse the angular momentum remains the same but the momentum of inertia is sharply reduced. The standard example is that of a figure skater spinning with outstretched arms who speeds up by pulling in his/her arms. Black Holes are formed from the collapse of the largest Blue Giant stars 5 to 20 or more solar masses. Neutron stars are formed from the explosion of stars with 1.35 to 2.1 solar masses in a Type II, Type Ib or Type Ic supernova explosion. The rapid rotation of Supermassive Black Holes is in fact the reason Spiral Galaxies exist in the flattened disk form they do with spiral arms—because of the huge gravitational force exerted by the rapid rotation of Supermassive Black Holes which form their galactic centers! As the rotating Supermassive Black Hole in the galactic center gradually increases in size through accumulation/accretion of more stellar material and gas, the elliptical galaxy, which is in the process of becoming a spiral galaxy, first flattens due to the rapid rotation of the Supermassive Black Hole in its center.
The spiral arms comprised of outlying stars are formed by the combination of the gravitational force coming from the rapidly rotating galactic center and the relative gravitational attraction of one outlying star to another based on their actual distances from one another. As the outlying stars approach neighboring stars due to gravity this leaves other areas where stars are much less concentrated giving rise to the appearance of usually 2 major spiral arms originating from each end of the central bar often found in the galactic center, as well as several minor spiral arms, all of which are actually in the process of being gradually drawn inexorably toward the galactic center. The gravitational force of the Black Hole, the mass of which is steadily increasing, gradually overcomes the outward centripetal force caused by its rapid rotation.
Central bars form after the Supermassive Black Hole in the center of a large spiral reaches a certain size and are therefore found more prevalently in more massive galaxies where the required mass is reached sooner. Central bars form when stellar orbits in a spiral galaxy become unstable and deviate from a circular path. The tiny elongations in the stars’ orbits grow and become locked into place, forming a bar. The bar becomes even stronger as it locks more and more of these elongated orbits into place. Eventually a high fraction of the stars in the galaxy’s inner region join the bar. The galactic center thus attracts both gas and stars. This concentration of gas at the center of spiral galaxies does result in the formation of new stars but does not represent the primary or original source of star formation, which occurs in the beginning of formation of galaxies from gravitational condensation and collapse of primordial gas clouds. The central bars draw a large amount of gas towards the galactic center, fueling this new star formation, building central bulges of stars, and feeding the massive central black hole. The formation of a bar may be one of the last stages in the evolution of a spiral galaxy prior to its eventual total collapse entirely into its central Supermassive Black Hole.
The Hubble Constant is a calculation of the speed at which the Universe is expanding and is crucial in calculating the age of the Universe. Four methods have been used to estimate the Hubble Constant and age of the Universe. The most recent method employed by Allan Sandage, et al measures the distances to Type 1a Supernovae explosions in distant galaxies and then confirms those measurements by comparing the relative luminosities of Cepheid variable stars as so-called “standard candles,” while Wendy Freedman’s NASA team uses Cepheid Variable stars alone, which is a lot less accurate. Freedman’s method especially is an easy method in which to either err or to deliberately falsify results as she and her NASA team have clearly done. (See below.) The typical errors in calculating the Hubble Constant include: 1.) “the universal, yet unjustified Period-Luminosity relation of Cepheid (variable stars), 2.) neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited samples or 3.) the errors are inherent to the adopted models,” which cause most values of the Hubble Constant and corresponding estimates of the age of the Universe to be incorrect as explained in detail in the most comprehensive review which has yet been published, which also includes the Sandage team’s most recent calculation of the Hubble Constant to date of 62.3 +or–1.3, which is based on measurements to 279 galaxies: “The expansion field: the value of the Hubble Constant,” by G.A Tammann, A. Sandage and B. Reindl, Astron Astrophys Rev (2008), 8 July 2008, 15:289-331, DOI 10.1007/s00159-800-9912-y.
This value of the Hubble Constant corresponds to an age of the Universe of approximately 13.7 billion years, which should be sufficient to permit the Big Crunch. However even this method of calculation of the Hubble Constant, which as exhaustively explained and documented by Allan Sandage et al, is fraught with potential errors cited above, which Sandage takes account of and systematically avoids. As mentioned above Wendy Freedman and Co. on the other hand use only Cepheid variable stars in their “calculations” and deliberately include faulty (fraudulent) data in their calculations as explained to this writer personally by Allan Sandage, therefore making Freedman & Co.’s method of determination of the Hubble Constant even easier to falsify. Such data is systematically excluded by Sandage et al. as explained above. In response to the withering but suppressed critique by Sandage et al, known primarily only to other astrophysicists who follow these matters, Freedman has published a slew of pathetic papers addressing such topics as “correction of errors involving optical extragalactic background light (EBL), sampling-induced errors, magnitude errors, and random and optimal sampling,” etc. where she always comes up with ridiculously high (fraudulent) values for the Hubble Constant. Fraudulent data was necessary for Freedman & Co. to reinvent the entirely fictitious so-called “dark energy,” Einstein’s “Cosmological Constant,” (“My greatest blunder!” See below), which is declared to be “the opposite of gravity” and which has no scientific explanation whatsoever but is proffered as “the reason” the capitalist dictatorship and its media (and textbook) propagandists now say that the expansion of the Universe has unexplainably “speeded up,” a “finding” which violates all previous findings not to mention all known rules of physics including the General Theory of Relativity! In other words this finding is totally invented, totally fabricated, a Big Lie to end all Big Lies! All designed to achieve political-religious-propagandistic objectives. See below. Legitimate opposing viewpoints are simply ignored and in practice not permitted to be heard! How jolly!
Regarding the most recent results given above for the Hubble Constant, this writer would still prefer to accept Sandage’s previous calculation of 55 +or-5, which has been repeatedly established in papers from 1975, 1982, 1986, 1990 and 1995, although it may certainly be possible that the 62.3 +or-1.3 value is the most accurate and it is certainly can be argued that 55 +or-5 is not that far removed from the new figure. The reason for this caution is that Allan Sandage is now 82 years old and although he is 100% intellectually intact and in control of all of his faculties his name is listed second in the above paper indicating that he himself may not have collected the data used in the calculation giving 62.3 +or-1.3 for the Hubble Constant. I have not spoken or corresponded with the other members of his team, which also includes A. Saha who was not included in the above paper, as I have with Allan Sandage, so I can not rule out alteration of the raw data to give a falsely high Hubble Constant by certain personnel who might be bribed by the NASA forces in charge of the Key Project, which was set up determined to achieve a certain result come hell or high water. This issue is important enough to the capitalist dictatorship so that they would leave no stone unturned to tweek the results in their direction for reasons explained further below.
The U.S. so-called “intelligence community” organized the so-called “Key Project” in order to cover up the cyclic nature of the Universe from Big Bang to Big Crunch. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) was built primarily for the “Key Project.” This is an important point. The capitalist dictatorship chose Wendy Freedman to lead the project rather than the obvious choice, Allan Sandage, the legendary, most preeminent and world-renowned astrophysicist as well as the number one authority on the Hubble Constant along with his internationally renowned group of astrophysicist colleagues. See above. The reason was that Sandage’s studies up to that point had shown the Universe to be “between 14 and 18 billion years old, depending on what is assumed about the mass of the Universe.” This corresponds to a Hubble Constant, which he and colleagues had repeatedly calculated to be 55 +or-5 as cited above. An older age, of course, would mean that the Universe contained easily enough matter to permit the Big Crunch, which is the key point the capitalist propagandists want to discredit because that would rule out a single creation and make the existence of a god, for which there is no scientific evidence whatsoever, even more unlikely! This is the actual statecraft behind the “Key Project.” See further below.
Freedman’s initial claim that the Universe was only 8 billion years old was obviously fraudulent, as have been all of her subsequent “estimations.” All of Freedman’s estimations of the age of the Universe and the Hubble Constant have been designed to try to fraudulently invalidate (!) the Big Bang, the Big Crunch especially and the cyclic nature of the Universe in particular. The preposterous claim of an 8 billion year age is a direct attack on the Big Bang, which has been verified worldwide. In her initial unrestrained enthusiasm to falsify and misinterpret her own data (see above) Freedman forgot about the 1.) Red shift discovered by Edwin Hubble (see below) and 2.) the detection of the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is the residual effect of the Big Bang both of which exist as irrefutable evidence for the Big Bang origin of the Universe! Anyone using simple inductive reasoning would immediately begin to smell a rat! The capitalist dictatorship has a long history of political meddling and sabotage in virtually all fields of scientific and medical research and a history of using scientific advances against the masses in order to control them and also to reduce the population according to their own perceived needs, e.g. from Bio-warfare to Bio-fuels (through enforced starvation). In January 2003 Freedman was made the Director of the Carnegie Observatories located in Pasadena, California where Allan Sandage works thereby placing her above him as a maneuver to make her fraudulent estimates of the Hubble Constant appear more authoritative in the public eye!
There is no such thing as “Dark Energy” and the Universe has not suddenly increased its rate of expansion as falsely claimed by these frauds. Just the opposite! The rate of expansion of the Universe has continued to slow! All previous studies have indicated that is the case. The Universe is not open. It is NOT flat! It is closed. In reality there are no “worm holes.” For worm holes to exist just within the known Universe would require changing space-time topology and regions of negative energy, which does not actually exist. There are no “strings.” “string theory” is a mathematical attempt to try to refute and supplant, not explain, the Theory of Quantum Mechanics the foundations of which were established during the first half of the twentieth century by Max Planck, Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, Albert Einstein, etc.! See below for the most likely solution to the Grand Unified Theory.
It should also be noted that although we may be able to receive light from galaxies which started its journey virtually at the beginning of the Universe, that light does not portray the reality at this point in time of that galaxy which was the source of that light. The reality is that most of the Universe is undoubtedly relatively uniform in its development today except where there are huge clouds of gas from super novae explosions and where there are huge accumulations of matter such as the Great Wall of galaxies, the latter of which formed due to the irregularities which occurred in the Big Bang just as in any other explosion. In other words the light from our own galaxy, the Milky Way, would appear to be receding from the most distant galaxies at the same rate that their light is receding from our own galaxy! This should be a no-brainer but is rarely if ever mentioned. The only point of view which is ever mentioned is from the Earth as if it were the center of creation. Which it is not!
Recent Findings Document that the Mass of the Universe
Increases as Matter Enters a Black Hole and the Final Singularity!
This Finding Totally Refutes Infinite Expansion of the Universe
And “String Theory!” The Fact That Neutrinos Have Mass Also
Provides the Basis For the Big Crunch!”
The false claim that there is supposedly “insufficient Dark Matter” to permit the Big Crunch to take place is entirely refuted by 2 discoveries. Perhaps even more significant than the work on neutrinos discussed below is the most recent paper published on November 21, 2008 in Science. More than 99% of the visible mass of the Universe is made up of protons and neutrons. Recent calculations of the mass of the nucleus, which found that that matter, which is composed of protons and neutrons, which are in turn are composed of quarks held together with gluons by the strong force, normally exists as 95% energy, according to the formula from Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity: E=mc2! This provides further confirmation for the Big Crunch. The reason, not drawn as a conclusion by the authors of the paper, is that in a Black Hole and moreover in the final Black Hole, the “Singularity,” that relationship would be 100% reversed, with all matter existing in the form of mass: m=E/c2. The mass of the Universe would therefore apparently increase according to these findings as matter enters a Black Hole as energy shifts to its mass equivalent! Obviously this is the precise opposite of what occurs in a nuclear explosion where E=mc2. (Science, Vol. 322, 5905:1198-1199 and 1124-1127) On the other hand such tidbit reports as “Excess Particles From Space may Hint at Dark Matter,” (Science, Vol. 322, 5905:1173) are only red-herrings meant to titillate, to keep attention from focusing on findings of genuine significance.
The discovery that neutrinos have mass also provides a basis for the Big Crunch. This fact was first reported on July 1, 1998 by a collaboration of 120 U.S. and Japanese physicists at the Neutrino 98 meeting in Takayama, Japan and submitted to Physical Review Letters. (By Super-Kamiokande Collaboration (Y. Fukuda et al.) Phys.Rev.Lett.81:1562-1567,1998.) Neutrinos have sufficient weight to allow the Big Crunch! The experiment measured the differences in mass of the three types of neutrinos to be 0.1 eV or greater. The group reported that the simplest interpretation of the solar and atmospheric results is that the heaviest neutrino has a mass of 0.1 eV. However, they reported that since oscillations between the 3 types of neutrinos depend only on the differences in mass it is possible that the masses of all three neutrinos are fully 1 eV or greater, but that it is the mass differences which are much smaller. (They allow for the “possibility.” How nice! They know that the majority of physicists do not simply automatically accept the interpretation which is first proffered.)
This makes the most sense and is of course suppressed for political reasons. (See below.) If the mass of the neutrino is 1 eV that would mean that neutrinos account for more mass in the Universe than all of the protons and neutrons put together easily supplying the dark matter necessary for the Big Crunch. As mentioned the critical mass density required for the Big Crunch to occur is 1 x 10 to the negative 29th of a gram per cubic centimeter (approximately 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter), according to the calculation from the General Theory of Relativity. In addition, the fact that neutrinos have mass also provides the basis for the Grand Unified Theory which links the gravitational force described in the General Theory of Relativity with the strong and the weak forces and electromagnetism described in the Theory of Quantum Mechanics. Einstein struggled and failed to formulate this theory, but it has already been shown that at high enough energies electromagnetism and the weak force are the same force known as the electroweak force. It is theorized that if energies are increased even further and neutrinos acquire mass, which has now been fully documented, all the known forces will reduce to the same force thus providing the basis for the Grand Unified Theory. Instead these facts are de-emphasized with the false claim that “no one—not even Einstein—has been able formulate the Grand Unified Theory” in order to try to open the door to fraudulent “string theory.” The 1998 report that neutrinos have mass was blipped in the media and then neutrino research was de-funded worldwide and thereafter suppressed for a period of time. Wonder why?? It is time to employ some inductive reasoning, which is in fact scientific reasoning.
The Big Crunch will arrive on schedule and another Universe will begin! Einstein once said that a theory of the Universe should be both simple and elegant. He would definitely be rolling over in his grave if he were made aware of today’s totally contrived “science” especially the attempt by these fakers to re-introduce his fudge factor, the so-called “cosmological constant,” which Einstein invented/fabricated to allow for a static solution to his equations, which he was later forced to admit was false after the discovery of the Redshift by Edwin Hubble, which occurs when light or any type of electromagnetic radiation from distant galaxies shifts toward longer wavelengths, the less energetic part of the spectrum, due to the Doppler effect, thus indicating that those galaxies are moving away from our galaxy, the Milky Way (and vice versa) and that the Universe is (still) expanding (while it is also simultaneously contracting on another level—see below). (The Redshift in light from receding galaxies is proportional to their distance from Earth. That is Hubble’s Law.)
The false assumption of a static Universe had prevented Einstein from predicting that the Universe was expanding. Einstein admitted that the “cosmological constant” was his “biggest blunder.” (In December 1930 Einstein went to Cal Tech on a visiting professorship where he worked with Edwin Hubble and reportedly also apologized for his error.) In 1998 the U.S. so-called “intelligence community,” directed their fleet of fake “cosmologists” and some opportunist and duped astrophysicists to try to pass off Einstein’s fraudulent cosmological constant as the entirely fictitious and admittedly totally unexplained so-called “dark energy,” (!) AKA “quintessence, “ which is supposedly responsible for a supposed “speeding up of the rate of expansion of the Universe,” which is NOT in fact actually occurring. This rubbish has even been forced into advanced textbooks in astrophysics as good coin. The reason for these wholesale falsifications of astrophysics is due to the capitalists’ desperation to establish a false basis to claim that the Universe supposedly had a single creation and that it will expand infinitely rather than collapse once again in the Big Crunch completing another cycle in an infinite number. The U.S. governments’ position more easily allows for the existence of a “god” as “the creator.”
The reason that the capitalists have formed an alliance with religion is that the capitalists depend on religion, belief in god and the supernatural as important weapons of deception directed against the masses! This also helps explain the appearance of fraudulent so-called “string theory” which postulates multiple Universes, eleven dimensions, rather than the 4 dimensions which actually do measurably exist. Stephen Hawking the ego-tripping, media-hyped “cosmologist” also postulated supposed “wormholes from one Universe to another” as well as supposed “wormholes” from one end of our Universe to the other to permit time travel “faster than the speed of light” (both of which are completely refuted by Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. While Hawking retreated on being so reminded, Heisenberg is brazenly ignored by other professional police-agent propagandists who are committed to such Big Lies of confusion such as the New York Times’ despicable Dennis Overbye (Oy!), Brian Greene and WBAI’s huckster Michio Kaku, who incidentally also covers up the fact that AIDS is Biowarfare by the U.S. Government Against Blacks and Gays primarily and tries to confuse his trusting, credulous listeners (and even students!) on innumerable other issues. The bottom line is that the capitalists want the masses to believe in a god—any god—even though there is no scientific basis whatsoever to support belief in a god (precisely the opposite)—because, to the extent that they believe in god, those who do believe in god believe that what happens in the world, including both natural events and political events, happens according to god’s will! The reality is that natural events occur due to the natural laws of science, physics and evolution, and what happens in world political events is due primarily to the decisions and actions of the U.S.-led world capitalist dictatorship, which still dominates world events! In the mind of the believer, god and the capitalist dictatorship—the capitalist government—become one! The capitalist government becomes god in the mind of the believer! This is pretty strong stuff and is what Karl Marx meant when he described religion as the opiate of the masses. Such false belief patterns of believers in god blunt the thrust for revolutionary change. Revolutionary change requires an absolutely scientific, objective and logical analysis of political events, political contradiction and political history, in order to learn how to carry out effective social change, meaning Socialist Revolution here in the United States and worldwide!
Michio Kaku and So-Called “History Channel” Establishment Cover Up the Fact that
Einstein’s First 3 Papers in 1905 Were a Collaborative Effort With His Wife, Mileva Maric!
It should be mentioned that Michio Kaku and several others in typical sexist fashion in a 2-hour report on Albert Einstein on the so-called “History Channel” covered up through omission the irrefutable fact that Einstein’s wife Mileva Maric made substantial contributions to Einstein’s first 3 papers in 1905, his miracle year, and that her name was on all 3 papers which were first submitted according to the Russian scientist, Abraham Joffe, who saw the signatures of both Einstein and Mileva Einstein-Marity (Marity is a Serbian form of Maric) on the original copies of the those papers. Maric’s name was later removed from all the originals to hide her contributions in keeping with the sexism of that time when women could not even vote and were deemed to be mere chattels. Mileva Maric’s contributions are specifically mentioned in 13 of the 43 of Einstein’s love letters to Maric, those which were not destroyed. Thirteen of those letters contained statements which referred to refer to her research or to their ongoing collaborative effort. The most likely reason for the destruction of the other letters was of course to hide the fact that those 3 historic 1905 papers were in fact a collaborative effort. See: http://home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/mileva.htm and http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep4/ep4maric.htm as well as a very determined and disparaging attack of Mileva Maric at: http://www.esterson.org/milevamaric.htm, which nevertheless is refuted by the actual facts. Later in 1914 when they moved to Berlin, and after Einstein had had his macho ego pumped up through the roof by Max Planck and others, Einstein actually tried to get Mileva to sign an onerous document, apparently a provocation designed to drive her away, which was rejected by Maric, which would have reduced her to a virtual slave in her own house! Kaku and the other “experts” of the establishment also cover up the fact that Einstein lacked the mathematics to properly formulate the General Theory of Relativity, because he could not formulate the mathematical proof, and that he had to be tutored in differential geometry for over a year by his longtime friend and colleague Marcel Grossman, who had attended the classes which Einstein had skipped. The bottom line here is that Einstein was an intuitive astrophysicist, not an experimental astrophysicist and as such would undoubtedly have needed and benefited enormously from the relationship he had with his physicist wife, Mileva Maric, to confirm his ideas and to hear alternative points of view which the surviving letters from Einstein to Mileva indicate he incorporated into his first 3 papers from 1905. Einstein was not a god and had help all along the way.
The Scientific Basis of Atheism:
The Origin of Matter is an Unknowable!
The capitalist dictatorship would have the masses believe that there is no limit on humankind’s knowledge, that everything is knowable and that everything was created by god. But this is false; there is a limit on knowledge and there is no god. Because of the fact that we exist as part of the Universe we can not exit the Universe, stand outside it and declare that a god, much larger than we are naturally but of course in our own image, who naturally is usually white and always male never female, created the Universe. The corollary is that the origin of matter is an unknowable! The false claim of supposed “wormholes” by the string theorists of course is a way to try to condition peoples’ minds to believe that they can do the opposite and exit the Universe, and is designed to set up the belief patterns for belief in god. (And while you’re at it, after you have exited the Universe don’t forget to check out “god,” he’s right over there. Right near that wormhole you just crawled out of!) Modern science has answered virtually all questions except one: the origin of matter. This is an unknowable. What is knowable is the cyclic nature of the Universe and the evolution of life, which is inevitable given basic necessary conditions. See above. Today religion and god continue to be invoked by the capitalist dictatorship to explain both the origin of life, matter and the existence of the Universe, rather than simply agreeing that certain things are unknowable. The reason is that the capitalist dictatorship uses religion to control the masses is explained above.
The original basis for belief in god (multiple gods initially) and religion was due to humankind’s inability to explain natural events and life itself. Primitive society had to have an explanation for what could not yet be explained scientifically. The philosophy of antiquity was primitive, spontaneously evolved materialism (Engels), which found its expression in polytheism where various gods were invented in the minds of primitive peoples, which were thought to control different areas of life: There was a sun god, a moon god, a weather god(s) thought to control rain, thunder and lightning, a god for earthquakes, a god of the seas, a god for day, a god for night and in some societies a god to control almost every aspect of life. Polytheism however was incapable of clearing up the relation between mind and matter. As Engels explains: “the need to get clarity on this question led to the doctrine of a soul separable from the body, then to the assertion of the immortality of this soul, and finally to monotheism.” As humankind’s thought gradually advanced and natural events acquired scientific explanations, polytheism gave way to monotheism. The old materialism was therefore negated by idealism. But in the course of the further development of philosophy, idealism, too, has become untenable in a practical sense and has been negated by modern Dialectical and Historical Materialism, presently tightly suppressed by the capitalist dictatorship.
Prior to the development of modern materialism, which serves as the basis for this analysis, and existing simultaneously with its development, organized religion formed pacts with the existing power structures, pacts which have spanned the entire sequence of civilization from the primitive slave societies of Egypt, Greece and Rome to the feudalism-based monarchies of Europe to today’s rapidly hardening war-based capitalist dictatorship. When the French Monarchy and the nobility were overthrown in the French Revolution the Catholic Church was first rejected as a competing center of power but then embraced as indispensable by the emerging bourgeoisie, which emerged victorious under Napoleon Bonaparte when it became clear that the peasantry, which had carried out the revolution could not organize or wield power. The bourgeoisie quickly realized that religion was necessary to control the masses as under the Monarchy and signed the Concordat of 1801 that reestablished the Catholic Church in France but with reduced influence. This has continued into the modern day where the capitalist dictatorship uses the belief in god and religion to blunt the thrust for revolutionary change as explained above. NAZI Germany also signed the Reichskonkordat in 1933 with the Catholic Church and similar agreements with the protestant churches in Germany, which were an important step in international acceptance of the NAZIs. Today the capitalists work overtime to keep alive the belief in a “supreme being,” taking advantage of man’s arrogance and insistence to be able to explain everything. As mentioned above humankind cannot exit the Universe and is limited in this way. In the same way the origin of matter is also thus unknowable. The scientific basis of atheism includes but is not limited to the knowledge of the Special Theory of Relativity, The General Theory of Relativity, The Theory of Quantum Mechanics, the Big Bang/Big Crunch Cycle of the Universe, the origin of life through the Primordial Soup Theory of Stanley Miller and Harold Urey and Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Through Natural Selection. This scientific basis of life and the Universe does not hold a place for a god. The capitalists’ propagandists try to keep the false idea of a god alive by claiming that science and religion are not incompatible. But they are incompatible! There is no scientific basis for belief in a god and the religious Fascists know it very well. That is why they wage a continuous never-ending battle against science in the classroom. The capitalists also front large organizations such as the John Templeton Foundation and the Stanford Templeton Research Institute for Nature, God and Science (STRINGS!) to try to reconcile religion and belief in god. Good grief! Don’t be fooled for a second!
Religious superstition can play no constructive role in either genuinely progressive thought or the process of organizing a Socialist Revolution in the United States. On the other hand the Socialist Revolution, while it does not support religion, permits no crushing of any religion nor does it not pit one religion against another as the capitalists do routinely as part of their strategy of divide and conquer. This is what the capitalists are doing in Iraq right now as part of their strategy of divide and conquer. The future of religion will be determined by an open long-term debate over time in a revolutionary evolving society and the strength of scientific evidence in addition to the polemics carried out by proponents of all religions as well as the proponents of atheism and Dialectical and Historical Materialism.
NOTE: the following paragraphs precede the above paragraphs in the entire piece about Global Warming and are in the proper order in the full Analysis and Theses.
The Runaway Greenhouse Effect has already occurred on Venus where all the CO2 is found in the 932 degrees Fahrenheit (500 degrees Centigrade) atmosphere. The water in the oceans of Venus, which were nearly the size of the oceans on Earth, all evaporated away very early because of the heat generated by Runaway Greenhouse Effect caused by the fact that Venus receives 30% more sunlight than the Earth. The evaporating oceans finally boiled away completely after the temperature reached a measly 212 degrees Fahrenheit—on its way to the present 932 degrees Fahrenheit. Once in the upper atmosphere ultraviolet radiation from the sun split the H20 apart into hydrogen, which disappeared into space and oxygen, which reacted with minerals on the surface and also disappeared from the atmosphere. The Evolution of Life is what prevented a Runaway Greenhouse Effect from occurring on Earth as it did on Venus! Life did not evolve on Venus, with the consequence that there was no plant and animal life to absorb the gradual build-up of CO2 from volcanoes, which eventually formed the thick atmosphere which exists on Venus today composed primarily of CO2 (96.5%) with the remainder nitrogen (3.5%) and other minor components expressed in a few parts per million plus a sulfuric acid cloud deck beginning at about 50 kilometers above the surface. On Earth the CO2 which was released into the atmosphere through volcanoes went into evolving vegetation and then animal life, which over hundreds of millions of years became deposited in the crust of the Earth as the fossil fuels coal and oil. There is no carbon found in the crust of Venus. That is how we know that life did not evolve on Venus. Today the frenzied burning of those fossil fuels here on Earth has resulted in having the huge amount of CO2 stored in them being released all at once into the atmosphere. The Earth’s carbon sinks, the Earth’s natural storage mechanisms for CO2—the rain forests other vegetation and the oceans—have a limit and are now being overwhelmed. As occurred on Venus billions of years ago, that process now appears to have reached the stage of the Runaway Greenhouse Effect here on Earth. Without a Socialist Revolution here in the United States, which is the only possible way to still reverse that process, the situation on Venus today is the future of the Earth in the not so distant future. We are presently experiencing the beginning of that future. Life on Earth will become totally unlivable far before we arrive at the situation existing on Venus today.
The temperature on Earth does not have to rise very much to destroy all life. This is the reality which fake “opposition” figures such as James Hansen and Al Gore deliberately hide, while they attempt to control the issue and lead it to defeat. (See below.) In the 1951 science fiction/political film, The Day The Earth Stood Still, the Earth was visited by people in a flying saucer from a more advanced civilization which delivered an ultimatum at the end: “It is no concern of ours how you run your own planet, but if you threaten to extend your violence, this Earth of yours will be reduced to a burned out cinder. Your choice is simple: join us and live in peace, or pursue your present course and face obliteration. We shall be waiting for your answer. The decision rests with you.” The result of Earth being reduced to a burned out cinder is clearly not limited to war and peace or even nuclear war. Although it goes without saying that capitalism-imperialism, due to its internal dynamic as explained herein, automatically extends violence everywhere and even to outer space with its Star Wars Program, etc. (which has thankfully not yet been realized in practice), capitalism has also extended its maximum violence to the environment. The environmental reality, not science fiction, is that with the onset of the Runaway Greenhouse Effect the Earth is now on course to become a burned out cinder like Venus! Only a Socialist Revolution can avert this catastrophe! It is our right and it is our duty to avert this catastrophe by ending the capitalist dictatorship in the United States through a Socialist Revolution.
The falsely labeled “Archaea” bacteria, tube worms, which have evolved to live at temperatures of up to 110 degrees Fahrenheit, and the hyperthermophilic bacteria, which have evolved to live at water temperatures of up to 239 degrees Fahrenheit will be the last life on Earth because of their ability to live at high temperatures.. (Incidentally, “Archaea” was falsely so-labeled in order to spread confusion in science and to try to undermine in one blow both Darwin’s Theory of Evolution and the irrefutable Primordial Soup Theory of Stanley Miller and Harold Urey of 1953, who demonstrated that the basic building blocks of life; amino acids, purines, pyrimidines and carboxylic acids can all be produced by running electrical sparks simulating lightning through the most-likely original reducing atmosphere of Earth composed of methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water vapor or steam. Later experiments by Miller demonstrated that the precise atmospheric mixture was not as important as the fact that it be a reducing atmosphere, meaning that it must contain NO oxygen, because the compounds necessary for life, namely amino acids, purines and pyrimidines and carboxylic acids (required for the synthesis of lipids) cannot be produced in an oxidizing atmosphere! In addition, it has been reported that Jeffrey L. Bada, who had been a graduate student of Stanley Miller and Adam P. Johnson a graduate student at Indiana University visiting Bada’s laboratory on an internship working with co-workers have discovered 22 amino acids in the original samples from the Stanley Miller-Urey experiments, including 10 that had not been previously reported. (The Miller Volcanic Spark Discharge Experiment, Adam P. Johnson, Daniel P. Glavin, Antonio Lazcano and Jeffrey L. Bada, Science, 17, October 2008. page 404, Vol. 322, no. 5900, DOI: 10.1126 science. 1161527). See also The New York Times, October 17, 2008. In a 1996 interview Stanley Miller also revealed that he had been able to produce pyridines and purines by creating more concentrated pre-biotic “dry beach” conditions, which would have been present in lakes lagoons and beaches on the primitive Earth. From that point, self-replicating RNA molecules are well known and have been extensively studied and described in the major media and peer review journals. And DNA clearly evolved from RNA. There is no crediblee dispute.
In 1969 a carbonaceous meteorite fell in Murchison Australia which had high concentrations of amino acids, about 100 ppm, found in the same pre-biotic experiments of Stanley Miller, proving that the early evolution of life is a constant which occurs throughout the universe given certain favorable conditions, NOT that life came to Earth from comets or asteroids from elsewhere—so called “Theory of Panspermia,” which is also fraudulently being passed off as a “theory of life.” Cosmic rays and the heat of entry into Earth’s atmosphere would have destroyed all life potentially surviving the near absolute zero temperature of interstellar or interplanetary space. The goal of these determined and deliberate falsifiers is to keep the masses confused on as many scientific matters and political matters as possible because a confused person cannot act! False analysis of one issue leads in turn to false analysis of another. In such a situation the masses are much more to think what they are told to think and to do what they are told to do by the capitalist dictatorship. Since 1969 incidentally numerous carbonaceous meteorites have revealed the presence of amino acids.
In response to the knowingly false claim that life supposedly “evolved” rather than adapted to live around submarine vents formed under the oceans where tectonic meet, for example the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, it is a fact that submarine vents don’t make organic compounds, they decompose them! These vents are one of the limiting factors on what organic compounds would exist in the primitive oceans. At the present time, the entire ocean goes through those vents in 10 million years. So all of the organic compounds are destroyed every ten million years. That places a constraint on how much organic material could accumulate. In addition, it also provides a time scale for the origin of life. If all the polymers and other compounds that evolve are continuously destroyed that means life would have to start early and rapidly. Looking at the process in detail, it is clear that long periods of time would be detrimental, rather than helpful to this fraudulent, totally contrived and deliberately misleading so-called “theory” of the origin of life which was created, among other reactionary reasons (see below), in order to provide a false pretext for NASA to carry out extremely costly and entirely unnecessary and useless space ventures to outlying planetary satellites under the false pretext of “searching for life,” wherever there might be water discovered by spectral analysis for example, in order to keep their jobs and obtain continued government funding.
William H. Depperman, Coordinator
United Front Against Racism
And Capitalism-Imperialism
November 27, 2008

全部都是一群 sb sb sb

seriously, those of you who are saying ‘where’s the change’ are ignorant and obviously dont know anything about politics. it’s very repulsive, so just stop wasting your time on this site when you have no idea what you’re talking about. :)

George as always you are pretty stupid. Star power and brain power do ot work out. Star power always wins. When he is going to appoint you to something so we will not have to hear your (whatever) every night and on Sundays. Well, we don’t because we don’t listen anymore. You did us in with the election.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Sharon
http://www.autoloans101.info