By Dschabner

Nov 8, 2008 5:40pm

Obama Camp Disputes Some Perceptions Abroad

According to the Web site of Polish President
Lech Kaczynski
,
in
a conversation yesterday between him, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, and
President-elect Barack Obama, the newly-elected American president said "that
the anti-missile shield project will be continued."
 
Obama also "expressed hope that the political and
military cooperation between the two countries will be continued," the Polish
President’s Web site says, per Bloomberg News.
 
Obama disputes this characterization.
 
Senior foreign policy adviser Denis McDonough in a
statement said, "President-elect had a good conversation with the Polish
President and the Polish Prime Minister about the important U.S.-Poland alliance.
President Kaczynski raised missile defense but President-elect Obama made no
commitment on it. His position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he
supports deploying a missile defense system when the technology is proved to be
workable."
 
In August, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the
Polish government signed an agreement for Poland to host 10 interceptor
missiles, but Obama has not been a forceful advocate of this program and Polish
leaders are concerned that Obama may ultimately end the project.
 
"The American administration has changed. Whether the
Americans’ decisions will change, we don’t know,” Tusk told the Gazeta Wyborcza
newspaper. "If the Americans decide to stop or suspend the project, for example
because of financial reasons, we will just accept this information. We can’t
build it ourselves.”
 
Russia opposes such a system, and almost immediately
after Obama was elected Russia President Dmitry Medvedev announced plans to put
missiles in an area between Poland and Lithuania to "neutralize” the missile
defense system.
 
Meanwhile, Hamas strongman Mahmoud Zahar told The Associated Press on Friday that he has hopes for President-elect Obama.
 
"We hope, we hope, that Obama opens a new page with the
world, including the Muslim world," Zahar said.
 
But the message from the Obama camp: Not so fast, Hamas.
 
Obama senior foreign policy adviser Denis McDonough
said in a statement: "President-elect Obama said throughout the campaign that he
will only talk with Hamas if it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel’s right
to exist, and agrees to abide by past agreements
 
– jpt

User Comments

Good job staying firm on your previous statements and promptly quelling any misunderstandings or misconceptions about your foreign policy intentions. American is looking forward to turning the page on our lack of diplomacy and implementing full diplomacy!

Posted by: jpeezus | November 8, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I agree.

Posted by: matteroffacts | November 8, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

This is great. Excellent smack down to the Poles on this. Love it, love it.
Obama is moving with authority to send a message that he’s not going to be pushed around by foreign leaders. The Polish statement was COMPLETELY out of line, almost like they wanted to boss the new administration around, or were testing him. This doesn’t mean there won’t be missiles in Poland, but the authority thing is critical.
Imagine if he’d said “oh, yes, we’ll do whatever Bush and you guys say we should do”.

Posted by: Tungsten | November 8, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Another long national nightmare begins.

Posted by: Kitty | November 8, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

THE MESSIAH WAS EAGER TO BECCOME PRESIDENT FOR “CHANGE”
FROM SHOOTING WAR TO “COLD WAR”
TAKE A PICK..
THE HONEYMOON WONT LAST.
THE SAME MEDIA THAT ELECTED HIM WILL ALSO DO HIM IN..

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | November 8, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

It’s good he’s staying strong and clear; it can’t be easy with the mess the Republican White House left.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

wow didnt this happen already during the cold war period. I am pretty sure we made Russia stop their missile defense project, because it does not just give one side a huge advantage but it gives the other sides a reason to build more missiles.

Posted by: REDHOTTforPOLITICS | November 8, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I’m a European who hopes Obama will cool down the USA’s love for Poland, a country that gets a LOOOT of money from the European Union these days but in no way lives up to European standards for democracy and human rights. Poland is a country to keep a very critical eye on, for its strange mix of communist nostalgia and ultra right wing and extremist catholic movements. The USA should work on a strong bond and friendship with particularly the UK, France, Germany and Spain. Better keep Poland at some distance until that country has truly become a modern western democracy. Latvia might be a more reliable partner, though it is of course very small.

Posted by: petrus | November 8, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Ridiculous.
The only state that refuses to recognize Israel’s borders is Israel itself.
How can you ask Hamas to recognize Israel until it agrees on what its borders are?
I read this morning that Israel has once again launched a military incursion into Gaza, in violation of the agreement they had made.
It is absolutely ridiculous for the Obama team to pretend that Hamas is the one not honoring agreements here.

Posted by: Flash Override | November 8, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Interceptor missiles are nice, but what brought us down were boxcutters. Obama will be no pushover. He will win over a lot of his critics.

Posted by: Shockolit | November 8, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Mr. Obama has lied to us before; he will lie to us again.

Posted by: young_voter | November 8, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

REDHOTTforPOLITICS..yes but when that ideaolgy was around only the US and USSR had long range ballistic missiles. The list of countries with nukes and long range missiles continues to grow as we speak.

Posted by: boxcar | November 8, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Here we go… My advice to foreign leaders is to tape any conersations with The One to avoid “misunderstandings”..

Posted by: Fidelia | November 8, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

A politician lie – who would have thought? It’s unheard of for a politician to lie or change their mind.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

And certainly a Polish politician would NEVER lie or misinterpret.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

A little tough talk with Poland; a complete lack of tough talk, or even comment, to Russia for threatening to put up missiles. Too often, these liberal’s idea of diplomacy is to back down.

Posted by: Tom in MA | November 8, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

It’s a good thing that any misunderstandings are cleared up as quickly as possible – Obama’s team seems on top of that.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Tom it has been the U.S. threatening to put up missles – have you missed something?
You know like Bush and Cheney?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

I say, if the Europeans need a missle shield, let them build it. The EU economy is big enough for them to pay for it. If they don’t see the need, why should we ?

Posted by: garand911 | November 8, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

These are dangerous times. The cut and run libs will ruin this country. God help us all.

Posted by: KansasGirl | November 8, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Pefros: Interceptor missiles, not tactical nuclear warheads. Apparently you’ve missed something!

Posted by: Tom in MA | November 8, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Oh yes that’s right Tom – defensive.
If someone was going to come and attempt to place ‘defensive’ missles right next to the United States, you wouldn’t be threatened at all.
Get real.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

KansasGirl . .. you seem to have missed the fact the country is in complete dire straits – right now.
With the careful guidance of the Bush/Cheney regime, the country is at the doorstep of complete destruction.
The Democrats are just going to try to make the best of a bad, bad, bad situation.
I wish them good luck.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

KansasGirl:
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This includes RECORD overspending.
Where did the Republicans think this money was going to come from? The moon?
From 7/11 and Macdonalds workers?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

pefros…
dont worry about it man!!!! you guys got what you wanted. no more excuses. now its time for the “great democratic party” to save us all. whats there to debate anymore? im sure it will ALL be fixed within the near future. a new stimulus package and bailing out the auto industry should be a good start dont ya think?? IT COULD ALWAYS BE WORSE. and mark my words, it will be.

Posted by: tim | November 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Yeah, those facts about Republican overspending are pretty hard to take for right wingers to take.
Still, you’re big men – you can take it.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Here, have a look at it one more time . .. it will help you understand the situation the country now faces . . ..
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This includes RECORD overspending.
Where did the Republicans think this money was going to come from? The moon?
From 7/11 and Macdonalds workers?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

pefros…
does it make you feel good to come in here and bash republicans?! seriously? IT DOSENT MATTER ANYMORE. you can sit and make up lies that the “republicans ruined our country”, and all the other nonsense you spew. it dosent change the facts. BOTH parties are at fault, for many different issues, for many years. its not black and white like you seem to believe. i wish obama the best. we are all AMERICANS. buti feel sorry for you. you apparently are sooo brainwashed by obama and the dems, that you really seem to think they are going to fix things. THIS ISNT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT IT USED TO BE. not even what it used to be a decade ago. it is being taken over by the extreme left, and you dont seem to notice or care. i dont see one major issue that these guys will improve. just my humble opinion.

Posted by: tim | November 8, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

pefros…
its a little early for making the “this is HOW BAD the republicans have left our country” excuse isnt it?! jeez, obama hasnt even gotten into office yet, and you’re giving the sob story already??!!

Posted by: tim | November 8, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

No Tim, not dealing in my opinion or guesses. I’m just posting facts about the previous Republican government.
It illustrates the difficulties we face and how we got here, and it counters some of the nonsense arguments still being made here by right wing extremists.
Do I have complete faith in the Democrats and Obama?
Give me a break, I don’t have faith in any politicians after what the Republicans just did.
But I wish them the best.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

pefros…
has there been any mistakes made by the democratic leadership in congress in the last two yeas??

Posted by: tim | November 8, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Tim, that was 6 straight years of the Republicans controlling the White House, Congress and the Senate – they can take full responsibility for their deeds – and for those HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of DOLLARS of deficit they rang up.
You can say whatever you want about the last 2 years; they were a mess in large part because of the previous six. The Republicans set new standard for overspending.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

tim,
If the Republicans hadn’t ruined the country, they would have won the election. It is time for you to face facts and stop living in a dream world.

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

I don’t trust Bush’s decisions. It might look very “cool” to place missile defenses next to Russia, just like his “shock and awe” stunt in Iraq, but if it doesn’t meet the purpose, it is useless. The Iraq blunder and current economic problems have created some weaknesses in USA. We need to first take care of these weaknesses before bluntly challenging Russia.

Posted by: jonathanw | November 8, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

I think we have nothing to worry obout, Pelosi< Michelle and Obama will put everything on the right track.And the changes that is coming will be good for the people, like universal health care.It should be complitly managed by the government, not the insurance companies.The insurance companies are not interested in our health, they'r only interested to make money, and if you get sick they just cancel your insurance, and nothing much you can do obout it.Universal health care for every one, by the government isthe best as long as people will not abuse it.

Posted by: Sandy | November 8, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

The first thing he needs to do is get control of Pelosi and Franks from further eroding our economy as they have done the last two years of democratic control. Franks needs to go to jail over Fannie and Freddie since he made millions from them.
Then he needs to reverse the subprime mortage problems that the democrats put into place in the Clinton years so only those that can afford a home actually can buy one.
Then to stop future problems he can forget all the promises he made to get elected that will cause additional layoff’s and job loss’s that are happening now in preparation of his higher taxes.
He needs to worry about our economy since that is why he was elected and not get off into international affairs, I don’t believe community organizing covered those issues and he will be in over his head.

Posted by: HH | November 8, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

What makes this election interesting,the little boy won,now interesting to sit back and see what this know all kid does,think its bad now ? lol watch and see what happens. I do not feel sorry in no way for this sly kid President

Posted by: Raymond | November 8, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Obama didn’t campaign for universal health care. His only mandate is for children. That means if you have children, you will be required to get them coverage as well as pay for all those without children via that mandated coverage you will be forced to buy. He and Hillary debated that aspect of his health care plan a number of times, and he admitted that hers was a better plan if universal coverage of everyone was the goal. Gosh, didn’t you even pay attention to your own candidate?

Posted by: Kitty | November 8, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

HH:
If it was so important to regulate the mortgage and loan industries – and if the Republicans were so committed to it – why didn’t the Republicans do it when they had control of the White House, the Congress and the Senate for SIX YEARS?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Still voting “present”, I see.

Posted by: John | November 9, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Obama already planning first steps in the White House. Compiled at least 200 executive orders made by Bush that he will change.

Posted by: MM | November 9, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I notice that some here say that Obama, Reid & Pelosi are going to ruin the country because they are ‘extreme left’ liberals.
What’s amazing is that it seems these same folks think that things are great in America now, after the 8 years of ‘far-right’, Republican/neo-Con fundamentalist dogma and policy.
Everything is peachy keen right now in America…… right?
Since the ‘far right’ has brought the country to this moment, maybe, just maybe, it will take the ‘extreme left’ to fix it.

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

HH
re: ‘I don’t believe community organizing covered those issues and he will be in over his head.’
well, ‘that one’, you know the skinny community organizer, beat the whole republican party and is the next president of the U.S.
Maybe, you should wait and see what he does before you get any crazier in your wild assessments of his abilities.

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

and 1 more thang:
Republicans read this…. then…..
shut the hell up and quit yer bit*hin’…
‘the Bush administration/campaign and the Republican party declared Bush’s 2004 election victory a popular mandate to enact his radical agenda:
* Private investments accounts for Social Security
* A new tax system to reward savings and investment
* Reducing the costs to business of lawsuits and regulations
* Appointing more conservative judges
* Rallying the nation behind a pre-emptive, interventionist foreign policy, overlaid with a moral imperative to spread American-style democracy
On election night 2004, House Majority Leader Tom Delay declared, “The Republican Party is a permanent majority for the future of this country. . . . We are going to be able to lead this country in the direction we’ve been dreaming of for years.”
At a news conference two days later, Bush declared that his election was evidence that Americans supported his plans to reform Social Security, simplify the tax code, limit lawsuits and fight the war on terror. He pledged bipartisan cooperation with “everyone who shares our goals.” “I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it,” Bush said. “It is my style.”
‘When you win, there is … a feeling that the people have spoken and embraced your point of view. And that’s what I intend to tell Congress, that I made it clear what I intend to do as the president; now let’s work.’

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Republicans just need to chill out
for say 50 make it 100 years…
you guys could not run the country
and you could not run your
election campaign… So why
so kick back and let the work you
could not do for the Past eight years
get completed …. thank you…

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 9, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

Obama had time to talk to 15 tin-pot countries but is yet to talk to China and India. I can see his foreign policy inexperience oozing…

Posted by: vick | November 9, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Now I believe Obama will make a great President. That missile shield in Poland made no sense to me then and it still doesn’t but Obama should insist that Poland and Czech should be allowed into NATO. I also support Obama focussing on the Economy fisrt,then withdrawing our troops from Iraq as responsible as possible, rebuild our defence and then focus on Afghanistan. Israel should be the next step after all theses. I like his message to Iran. A nuclear Iran is unacceptable. If he can carefully navigate all thses, he will be one of the greatest Presidents ever. He should never budge to Russia and at the same time, he sould not make them our enemies. We need Russia to pressure Iran and I think he understands this.

Posted by: vuzous | November 9, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Two Sides, One Mouth. Get used to it.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 9, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

He needs Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State not Kerry or Richardson.
No other person will bring the heft and weight into that negotiating position.
Hillary Clinton needs to be in sec of state and Gates needs to be sec of defense.
Richardson or Hagel national security advisor

Posted by: dl | November 9, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Obama already planning first steps in the White House. Compiled at least 200 executive orders made by Bush that he will change.
Posted by: MM | Nov 9, 2008 1:26:50 AM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ogona will probably downsize the CIA and FBI and not let them speak to each other and share info. That seems to be the way of the Democrats. Remember Clinton? I feel so much safer…hum.

Posted by: Lilly | November 9, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I was rather disappointed at president-elect Obama’s first news conference. Although president elect Obama is good at making prepared speeches, he still not good at crispy, impromptu exchanges that’s a must for a President of the United States. We all know he made great acceptance speech, which he abruptly ended, for some reason, breaking the excellent rhythm he kept. But we awere all very excited for him for his victory. But our newly elected president’s first news conference was a near disaster. And his self-deprecating comment about “Mutt like me” is in poor taste and completely inappropriate for the dignity of the office he holds. I was shocked at that statement. And besides he made a snide remark about Nancy Reagan and about “Séances” for which he had to call her and apologize! I still think that Sen. Hillary Clinton would have done a much better job as the President of the United States in her first news conference!

Posted by: elytis | November 9, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I was rather disappointed at president-elect Obama’s first news conference. Although president elect Obama is good at making prepared speeches, he still not good at crispy, impromptu exchanges that’s a must for a President of the United States. We all know he made great acceptance speech, which he abruptly ended, for some reason─ breaking the excellent rhythm he kept. I think his first news conference was a near disaster. And his self-deprecating comment about “Mutt like me” was in very poor taste and completely inappropriate for the dignity of the office he now holds. I was shocked at that statement. And besides he made a snide remark about Nancy Reagan’s “Séances” for which he had to call her and apologize! I still think that Sen. Hillary Clinton would have done a much better job as the President of the United States─ from the get go!

Posted by: elytis | November 9, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Here, have a look at it one more time . .. it will help you understand the situation the country now faces . . ..
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This includes RECORD overspending.
Where did the Republicans think this money was going to come from? The moon?
From 7/11 and Macdonalds workers?
Posted by: pefros | Nov 8, 2008 8:50:48 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why didn’t you show 2007 with the democrats in congress in charge? 2008 was also a democrats year…hum, with the bail out…those democrats didn’t do any thing wrong..Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac???? Wait until you see 2009 with Ogona at the helm with his demo congress…then come back and report.

Posted by: Lilly | November 9, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

There was nothing wrong with Senator Obama press conference. It went well. The language like mutt like me is a joke on himself and signals that he is going to be free discussing about race. And we all should be free discussing about race. Secondly, the joke about Nancy Reagan was not out of taste but felt so only because Nancy Reagan never really engaged in seances but Hillary Clinton did. Thirdly, Ronald Reagan is not alive and it may just bring memories back. The question was stupid in the first place.

Posted by: vuzous | November 9, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Jake: The world is having one big Kumbaya party and you decide to stop on by and pop one of the balloons.
Just because you are doing your job as a journalist is no real excuse. When are you ever going to learn to fall into line?
For shame on you, Jake Tapper. For shame!!!
(wink)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 9, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Does Obama think he can Play other nations leaders, as he did the American people?
They do not think he is God and does no wrong, they have watch all the wrong he did across America, They witnessed the lies, and the Rhetoric. They witnessed him going behind his countries back to other nations and playing games on the people.
They will not tolerate it. The American People should stop tolerating the double standard. Of how Obama disrespects his own Country and the American People with NAFTA.
He can not brainwash the entire world.

Posted by: seah | November 9, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

As long Obama bad mouths America the other counties loved him.

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 9, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Shutting down the missile defense system? What!? Why?! I guess he has to pay for all of his welfare-sold-as-tax-cuts somehow… Reading some of these comments and listening to Mr. Obama himself, it sounds like he thinks of diplomacy as simply talking; how wrong he is. Diplomacy involves using leverage to get cooperation whereas militarism involves using leverage to force results. When Obama dismantles the missile-defense system, he’ll be destroying our leverage abroad. International relations does not operate in some hippie fantasy like the UN; it operates in anarchy. Hopefully Obama will understand this, or America could accelerate down the Bush decline.

Posted by: Andrew E. | November 9, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

‘Lilly’
were the republicans successful from 2000 until 2008?
‘seah’
re: They witnessed him going behind his countries back to other nations and playing games on the people.
examples?
‘elytis’
re: ‘he still not good at crispy, impromptu exchanges that’s a must for a President of the United States.’
your seriously making that comment after Bush?

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I wish the Republicans would understand that the election is over and we won. Further, you can stop posting you crying statements. Join the conversations in a positive manner, Thank You Very Much!!

Posted by: Ranger phx | November 9, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Does Obama think he can Play other nations leaders, as he did the American people?
Posted by Seah:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Of course he does; he is the smartest person on the face of the earth with an ego the same size. Look how many voters he got…with a following of that magnitude, and mentality, why not.
Cancelled my tv, threw out my radios,put away the flags, cleaned my maid uniform and am keeping my computer for weather reports. Will just sit back and roll with the punches, and let the chips fall where they may…the end is near for the usa.

Posted by: Lilly | November 9, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

lilly
re” Look how many voters he got…with a following of that magnitude, …”
you betcha, gosh darn it…. wink wink…
lil community organizer beat the ‘mighty’ repubs..

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Andrew E.
What part of “no commitment” did you not understand. Obama left open the possibility of going either way in negotiations. What better “leverage” could there be?

Posted by: jock59801 | November 9, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Blue:
My question was not directed to you.
But, the democrats were in charge for the past two years…
Barney Franks, Maxine Waters, Pelosi, Reed and the list goes on: Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac and their bs didn’t stop there. I blame them for the financial crisis completely. I know, you will blame Bush, but remember if he did, he did not do it by himself…the democrats were in power!!!
Where would you be today if George W. Bush had not restored the CIA and FBI and let them share information, and restored and inacted other security measures after 9/11. Your beloved Clinton had almost destroyed the security in this country.
Well, get ready.

Posted by: Lilly | November 9, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

lilly
re” Look how many voters he got…with a following of that magnitude, …”
you betcha, gosh darn it…. wink wink…
lil community organizer beat the ‘mighty’ repubs..
Posted by: Blue | Nov 9, 2008 12:43:20 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You democrats never read the whole story, you just pick out the good parts that fit what you are trying to get across, i.e., “following of that magnitude”. You forgot to mention the “mentality of the voters”. And, I forgot to mention the ACORN fraud.
That little skinny community organizer…………..

Posted by: Lilly | November 9, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

liily
my my, you are sounding very ‘teste’,
with Bush & Cheney in office, and Repub obstructionism, hardly anything could get done.
neither party is perfect…..but
we will indeed see if the Dems ‘in power’ can make things better…… even considering the
mess the Repubs have left them….

Posted by: Blue | November 9, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

It was great for Obama and his wife to bad mouth America while the other countries cheered them on.

Posted by: scandleous | November 9, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

JC, what the hell is wrong with you kids? Grow up! Obama has NOT taken office, and won’t until 20 Jan, so stop acting as though he has already issued any ‘official’ proclamations or orders.
As far as all the ‘SORE LOSERS’ speaking here, the election is over and the people have spoken. [As a much older female, I know the disappointment of losing lots of elections. How do you think all the Dems felt in 2000 when we still believe Bush stole the election? How do you think we felt in 2004 when we believed Kerry won, and on that Tuesday night went to bed knowing he was our POTUS, only to awaken to find out Kerry lost? It was all horrible, but we had no recourse and got over it, and now you do too!]
Until Bush is out of office, Obama must remain in limbo and stay off the radar as much as possible so as not to step on Bush’s toes. So stop bickering and fighting like the children you show yourselves to be. He did not give a ‘yeh or nay’ to the Polish on the missle defense system, and inasmuch as I would like him to ‘dump the missle system’ entirely, there has been no decision voiced by Obama.
BTW, Obama is NOT a kid, he is almost 50 years old! He is extremely intelligent, will have the best advisors and actually wanted this job, so give it up! Just give him a chance to at least take office before raggin all over him.

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 9, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“The festive scenes of liberation that Cheney had once imagined for Iraq were finally taking place ” in cities all over America.”

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Sounds pretty moderate…I hope he sees that the missile shield tech is feasible and goes on with it.
Otherwise, I am hopeful that Obama will continue to stand strong on certain issues like dealing with Hamas, other state supporters of terror.
I am giving him the benefit of the doubt…Obama has a great opportunity to lead this country in a new direction. Now that the campaign is over, the rancor and exaggerations can stop, and the learning curve can begin…

Posted by: Wade | November 9, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Obama is actually practicing good fiscal conservatism by his restraint on the missile defense shields. They would cost billions of dollars and as of yet, remain unproven. According to the the bipartisan Arms Control Association, not a single test has been carried out under realistic combat conditions. The testing so far has consisted of slower speeds and lower altitudes than what would be expected in attack, and the intercepting missiles were preprogrammed with information on the target. So in effect, the testing has been designed to sell and proliferate the shields.

Posted by: kat | November 9, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Pls keep in mind that president Kaczyński is not very smart and does not understand the good manners in world politics. Kaczyński tried to use the phone-call with Obama for his local political fights against the local government. For the last several month the Polish president has been in an open confrontation against the Polish government. Obama is being used.

Posted by: olgierd | November 9, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

This message is for Republicans,
for those of you who say that President Elect Obama is naive and lacks experience.Consider how Obama started with nothing two years ago, then built a political movement from scratch, organizing and energizing millions of people to wage a grass roots campaign, raised hundreds of millions of dollars, and against all odds and predictions he outsmarted the Clinton campaign to win the Democratic Party Nomination !!! Then with his grass roots political organization he outsmarted and defeated the entire assembled Republican Party Including slime-balls political assassins like Carl Rove, and the “Pig wearing lipstick”. If he could so deftly deal with all this and win the election (without even breaking into a sweat), this is the person that I want dealing with the Russians, Iranians, and other assorted nut-jobs that our president has to deal with… Now consider that, if you think Obama is so naive and inexperienced, where does that leave “losers”. If a naive and unknown black man with no experience can beat everything you can muster against him, you are less than him, you are less than naive and lacking experience. You should be thanking God that someone like Obama came along when we so desperately needed a president with the ability to unite us internally so that we can deal with our internal proplems, and with the intelligence and wit to negotiate with our friends and enemies abroad… The Republican Party has turned into the “Party of Ignorance, Intolerance, Hate, & Lies”. It has become the “Clueless Clucks Clan”.

Posted by: X-republican | November 9, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Deploying a missile shield is one thing. Taking a clearly provocative step like deploying it in Poland, where it can only serve a useful purpose against Russia, not an Islamofacist threat such as Syria or Iran, is quite another. I’m hopeful that Obama will take a more realistic and less antagonistic approach with Russia, a nuclear power whose cooperation we need against Islamist elements who might actually *want* to nuke us. Obama’s campaign rhetoric gives scant evidence of this, but we can still hope…

Posted by: Pacific moderate | November 10, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

This is just the continuation of the Obamanation template – “Everybody is a liar except me!” The key is to take both sides of an argument, and then, when you have no choice but to choose, deny that you did it.

Posted by: Diogenes | November 10, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

I see no point in deploying a missile defense shield that’s unproven. Furthermore, the two national leaders pushing for it, Bush and Kaczynski of Poland, are both deeply unpopular. I agree with Pacific Moderate that we need Russian along with international engagement in eliminating terrorism. The missile defense system would only further bankrupt our economy, while significantly obstructing badly needed international cooperation. I’m confident that Obama will move us from the entrenched unilateralism of the previous eight years, much to the chagrin of some.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Not that Obama would change his message depending on the audience, and then deny he did so afterward. That sure doesn’t sound like him.

Posted by: WorldclaZZ | November 11, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.