Obama Derangement Syndrome
We all remember "Bush derangement syndrome" — defined by Charles Krauthammer as "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency — nay — the very existence of George W. Bush."
We already need a name for the reverse disorder.
Rep. Paul Broun, R-Georgia, recently said that he fears President-elect Obama may create a security force akin to the Gestapo to impose a Marxist dictatorship.
"It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he’s the one who proposed this national security force," Broun told The Associated Press. "I’m just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may – may not, I hope not – but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."
In July, Broun explained, Obama spoke of creating a civilian force so as to help the military shoulder some of the nation’s national security burden..
"That’s exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it’s exactly what the Soviet Union did," Broun said. "When he’s proposing to have a national security force that’s answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he’s showing me signs of being Marxist."
Broun theorized that after Obama creates this national police force he’ll ban gun ownership.
"We can’t be lulled into complacency," Broun said. "You have to remember that Adolf Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. I’m not comparing him to Adolf Hitler. What I’m saying is there is the potential."
- jpt
Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
Broun’s thoughts here is why the South was the only area of the country the bought into almost entirely the McCain line of fear rather than rational thought about who should be our next President. Obama will run his administration from the center not just because of choice but because of necessity to gain support of the broad collition that will be needed to solve America’s very serious problems. Buying 10 guns today because you “will lose the right to buy them in the future” is a waste of money pure and simple that is unless you have a real need for those guns today.
Posted by: craig | November 10, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
The reactionary, neanderthal spacemen make their strange appearance(s). Expect more to follow, as the cavemen emerge-bellow nonsense-and retreat into their black holes.
Posted by: sophillyfatz | November 10, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Could Rep Broun from Georgia may be more afraid of Obama’s skin tone than his ideology? Or do the two feed equal amounts of paranoia into the syndrome for Mr. Broun? The Obama Derangement Syndrome became undeniably apparent at a collective level during Sarah Palin’s rallies during October. Of course, I shouldn’t fail to mention that the manifestations of the disorder have also been obvious amongst those posting around here. It’s truly an insidious disorder! Perhaps the best treatment option would consist in supporting and raising the tolerance and informational levels of those who suffer from this mental malady.
Posted by: Dr. Kat | November 10, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
– George Washington
Let us recollect that peace or war will not always be left to our option; that however moderate or unambitious we may be, we cannot count upon the moderation, or hope to extinguish the ambition of others.
–Alexander Hamilton
Posted by: js | November 10, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
The campaign is over and Jake still finds the need to write about this stupidity. How about getting some real journalism done…ABC….you’re going to the dogs.
You’re Fox in disguise. Pathetic.
How about researching how many people died last year because of guns being in the wrong hands…kids shooting kids; kids playing with guns; people with clinical mental issues buying guns etc.
You folks should be filing Chapter 11…
Posted by: scooterfoot | November 10, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Broun seriously needs psychological help.
I’ve seen the tape of the supposed “national civilian force” discussion and it’s NOT AT ALL what he meant.
He was talking about fully funding and staffing our foreign service force. Which, of course, any sane person realizes is our first line of defense. They are the ones actually talking to those people who may have ill-intent. They can provide on the ground intelligence in a way no other service can. The CIA is excellent, but they can actually miss cues that our foreign service personnel can pick up. Our intelligence network and our foreign service, Working together (even if unknown to each other), and adequately funded and trained, we are in a better situation to avert dangers. which is always preferrable to sending troops in retaliation.
Only those that are willfully ignorant don’t understand that.
Posted by: Hoping for a better Future (formerly:This is SO Old) | November 10, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Broun is an ignoramus, spreading FUD. Ignore him and his ilk.
Obama is one of the very few honest and ethical politicians on this planet. You can take that to the bank.
Posted by: Majus | November 10, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Southerners know what it is like to be invaded by a hostile force that doesn’t share your values or your culture. Southerners know what it is like to be disenfranchised and deprived of their property. Perhaps that makes them better able to spot threats to their way of life than other Americans.
Perhaps instead of being red states and blue states we would be better off being the United Socialist States of America and the Confederate States of America. That way Southerners wouldn’t have to put up with urban condescension and urbanites wouldn’t be held in check by middle American values.
Posted by: ProudSoutherner | November 10, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Our armed forces, including reserves and National Guard are stretched so thin that the same soldiers are being deployed over and over again to their detriment and the detriment of their families. The National Guard shouldn’t be deployed overseas, but they are. Meanwhile, our borders are porous; our ports are like sieves, and the service that’s supposed to “watch the store” isn’t here. The CIVILIAN security corps Obama has proposed will be first domestic disaster responders; those able will teach in poor schools; others will help neighborhoods clean themselves up; will help rebuild our country’s infrastructure. By enlisting civilians for a tour of duty to ensure our domestic security, it will ease the
burden shouldered by our armed services.
Posted by: nanameow | November 10, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Take out syndrome and you got it Jake! For both the Democrats and especially the PRESS… Certifiably “Deranged” indeed! Obama won’t get another term just like his idelogical twin Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: hmn | November 10, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
it this not the most backwards stuff you have ever read?
These people will stop at nothing to try and make people afraid of obama.
Remember the woman at the mccain rally
“he,he’s,he’s an ARAB”
From what i have heard, all the people down in this man’ district will be the first to be on the force. they are running out of guns at the gun shops.
because they are all buying them up.
HEY! THE SOUTH’ GONNA RISE AGAIN!
what many do not realize is the south starting rising again the day the civil war ended.
whenever there is a thought of war
replace it with a stronger thought of
PEACE.
PEACE
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Nothing the Republicans do or say here in Georgia surprises me. I am not offended at all. Y’all go right ahead and make fun of them.
Posted by: Shockolit | November 10, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Seems to me that the first such civilian corps in this country was named…
“minute men”.
As commander in chief won’t BHO already have a stranding army of US citizens???
Why form another?
Help me find the right wing logic behind the fear please?
Posted by: Wazzup | November 10, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I presume that Rep Broun has forgotten Sen McCain’s proposed to deal with inner city crime, if he was elected Nov 4th. McCain planned to use “Surge” tactics. Yep, just send our troops in there like we did in Iraq and clean up those inner city problems!
I’m so glad McCain lost, and I’m hoping the Georgia electorate will boot Broun out the door too, when he comes up for re-election. What an ignoramus; I’d be embarrassed to have him represent me in Congress.
Posted by: mrspeel | November 10, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
This article describes my fears to a ‘T’. People need to put the pieces of the puzzle together BEFORE it is too late.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | November 10, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
So THIS is why there were communist flags on display Tuesday night.
hmmmmm…
Posted by: buyer's remorse yet? | November 10, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Craig: If buying ten guns today won’t make any difference except to the buyer, why object at all?
Posted by: Brian | November 10, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Give’m hell Rep. Broun. Don’t back down!!
He’s spent his life studying socialism and hanging out with Marxist. He had to campaign as a conservative to win. Allinsky taught him lying is justified for social justice!! He’s a snake!!
Posted by: Scott Blake | November 10, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
buyers remorse,yet?
yes, everytime bush rears his head we have buyers remorse.
but thank god, our national nightmare
is almost over.
Posted by: what? | November 10, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Who cares what this doofus thinks? 70% of America is squarely behind our president-elect. Happy days are here again.
Posted by: dem in chicago | November 10, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
i agree with congressman broun. this man is a socialist.all you liberals are so blind to this
Posted by: brett | November 10, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Dear “one planet, one people please,”
Try your logic on the people that died in the foreign terror attacks on American soil. It does not work. Don’t we all want peace? Sure, but sometimes you have to fight for it.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Whoa, yo, is this the the part where we all think Obama is doing the wrong thing at first when he installs a KGB like force to take over the govt but later we will realize it was the right thing to do? Thanks for warning us Joe.
This is serious creepy stuff folks. Lets don’t pretend Obama didn’t say it. I heard him and it didn’t sound like the boyscouts to me. We have the FBI, CIA, National Guard, Coast Guard, and local police and law enforcement in every burg in this Nation. The only repeat only reason for an additional force is because Obama could control it. The Governors control the National Guard and the Pentagon controls the military. Commander in Chief can give a command but it it sounds a little too funky the boys at the Pentagon are going to say Whoa, yo wait a minute.
Posted by: Georgia Girl | November 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
“Rational thought about who should be President???” You’ve got to be kidding. There was nothing remotely ‘rational’ about the swooning that came from the mere mention of the Chosen One’s name. There are people running around thinking that obama is going to pay their mortgage! Once he ruins the economy by decimating most of America’s small businesses and unemployment is running the highest in this country’s history, where is he going to get all the money needed to fund all these entitlement programs?? Oh, I forgot, Hollywierd will donate it all. :) History is going to judge us all, for sure. What will be written though is that the majority of the populace was so blinded by rage at the unpopular administration in office that they paid no attention to the policies of his successor — so long as he didn’t share the same party affiliation it didn’t matter. Remember I said it in 12 months, “YOU ASKED FOR IT AMERICA!!”
Posted by: Greg | November 10, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
The outbreak of ODS is quite limited but we definitely need a term for the mass Barack Peonage Discombobulation (BPD) so affecting the hoi polloi and media.
Posted by: Brad Brzezinski | November 10, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Thank you for reminding everyone about what has been said. Really it can be simply summed up: birds of a feather flock together ie Wright, Farakan, Ayers,Fledgler……. need I say more?
We are in deep trouble with this Obama that has never done anything. All we have seen of his ideas come from the people I just mentioned ie his buddies. I am so thankful that GOD is the one in ultimate control. If I didn’t have the faith to know this without a shred of doubt I would be very scared.
Posted by: elizabeth | November 10, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
How about this for the syndrome:
ObamaNation Syndrome (0NS)
Posted by: doc | November 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Don’t forget, fellow Dems, that we here in Georgia are facing an important runoff senate election soon, between Dem Martin and Rep Chambliss. There is a website, martinforsenate dot com where you can read about it. You can see what we are up against.
Posted by: Shockolit | November 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
i hope he’s not right, but there are some signs of potential trouble. there was the new presidential seal. there was the mention of a new security force (brown shirts anyone?) there was the mention by an aid of his “being ready to rule”.
also, there are a number of signs of disregard for others. 1st among them is his constant lateness. being late…keeping people waiting…. is a sign that you do not care about others. that you believe that everyone can wait on your schedule and be at your beck and call.
we shall have to wait and see, but don’t we always wonder why people in the past missed the obvious signs of trouble from leaders? maybe now we know why?
would we miss the signs? only if we choose to…..
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Excue me but did some one say “Obama is one of the very few honest and ethical politicians on this planet. You can take that to the bank.”
There is no one from the Chicago political machine on any level that is honest and ethical, check the history of Chicago politics. Can you say “naive and stupid” And as car as fighting for what is right and just I can’t say it any better the John Stewart Mills when he said,
“War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
John Stuart Mill
English economist & philosopher (1806 – 1873)
Posted by: Mike Wro | November 10, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
G girl,
So our POTUS (elect) will form a new civilian force which he himself contros which will be larger than the NG or standing military today (all volunteer force). This new ‘militia’ will be powerful enough to answer only to BHO with noone of a reasonable mind between BHO & the bullhorn shouting orders to kill & maim American citizens?
For real???
Have you ever tried to command men (and women) to carry out lawful orders with no anti-American qualities? I know that Oprah’s “THE ONE” has charisma not seen since RFK, but c’mon girl!
Posted by: Seriously | November 10, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Well Mr. Tapper, sounds like you’re in the tank for the messiah also. Would you like to explain to us why this country has to spend taxpayer dollars in our present economy on “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” as our legal military. Are you a Marist also or just plain stupid?
Both I would say.
Posted by: cody11 | November 10, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
I bet he starts with versions of gun control. He’ll inact that ridiculous assault weapons ban. The liberal-feel-good ban makes them think that the are taking the dreaded AK 47 off the street.
Then I suspect he will tax ammo and reloading supplies much like cigarretts. Piling on tax after tax until they are nolonger affordable to most. Pretty slick way of taking your guns away.
Posted by: 48 will threepeat | November 10, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
70 percent of the people support him even though he got 53 percent of the vote???
Posted by: hmn | November 10, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
WOW JOEL PALMER!!! You are really making an argument there. Again, the facts are lined up against you. Obama has done nothing but show up late and arrogant. Check your facts. As for an ass whipping, check your numbers again. My dead uncle voted democrat again, just like the last election. He has been dead since Sept. 2001. Tell me how that happened.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
ODS would be if we were blaming Obama for anything and everything that was not his responsibility. Only problem here is the messiah actually said he wanted to create this gestapo like force. So why isn’t anyone questioning this except for vague references in stories about about incorrect comparisons to BDS…
Posted by: CW | November 10, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Rep. Broun is a living testament to reincarnation. He was Joseph McCarthy in his prior life. Also he has Black Heart Syndrome.
Posted by: B. Bear | November 10, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
david,
where is the logic in “fight for peace”
you might fight to subdue
but it will not be a lasting peace.
we have been fighting, david, and still no peace.
and we will not fight our way to peace in the middle east.
the only way to have a lasting peace
is study war no more.
i do believe we should have arms for protection, and all nations should be in
agreement. and if one nation tries to subdue another nation with threats of war. all other should rise up against tht nation.
peace,david,peace,
we will never fight our way to peace.
it is going to have to be agreed on.
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
there is one reason that he might want this force: the US military takes an oath to protect and defend the constitution of the US 1st, then follow lawful orders…. 2nd. to what, or whom, would this force swear allegiance?? just a little thought to sleep on!
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
I could not have said it better. We cannot allow Obama and the International Communist Conspiracy ((c) 1952) to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.
Posted by: Ben | November 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Is Obama talking about having a “security force” in the same make-up as Rev. Farrakan? That’s OK with you Jake? I think the “Derangement Syndrome” is upon the followers of this guy, who never ran anything but his mouth in his life if discounts the socialist party of Chicago.
Posted by: octi | November 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
The problem is that, with Bush, it turned out not to be a “deragement” or a “syndrome.” At the end of the day, everything we on the left predicted about Bush really did come true. He really was incompetent. he really did lie us into war. He really did read our email and post and listen to our phone calls without warrants. He really did balloon the debt. He really did appoint incompetent cronies (see: Brownie, etc.). He really did sink America’s stature abroad to it’s lowest point in history. He really did trash the environment. On all these things… he really did them. That doesn’t make his 2000 critics “deranged,” it makes them prescient and 100% correct.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | November 10, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
One planet…
That kind of logic might work in Kindergarten or the commune, but not in the middle east. We can sit by and watch defenseless people be slaughtered, or we can step in. Your logic is the same of a bystander watching a bully, a shameless voyeur.
Posted by: I'm SKEERED!!! | November 10, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
one planet…please look up Neville Chamberlain. he’s between “capitulation” and “peace” (in our time) in the encyclopedia.
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
I wonder when Obama is going back for his grandmother’s funeral? Why has the news media not covering that?
I think one side has Obama derangement syndrome and the left has Obama reality denial syndrome.
Posted by: etothex | November 10, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Good to see that the lunatic faction is still alive and well, championing and championed by Rep. Paul Broun.
Man, you people are truly bonkers. Is the water where you are, or what?
Posted by: JM | November 10, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
If Obama wants my guns, or wants to take away my freedom of speech because he does not like what I say about him and his thugocracy, then I could care less if I have “Obama Derangement Syndrome.”
The difference is that Obama promised to do these things. It is not “deranged” to denounce them and denounce him as well.
Posted by: James Marsden | November 10, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
one planet…
You can’t just sit around and watch people be victims of genocide on the other side of the world and hope that it does not make to your neighborhood. It needs to be stopped, period. So, you can sit around and drink herbal tea and bash those fighting for your protection and freedom all you want. The truth is that it is going on, and needs to continue. Peace through strength and vigilance.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
The historical similarities are there. Whether or not they come to fruition remains to be seen. Those of you that are discounting Rep Brouns statement out of hand (this means you too Jake) don’t know your history, and therefore are doomed to repeat it. Maybe not with President Obama, but it will happen.
Posted by: Sean | November 10, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
neville c. was a bumbling, incompetent,egotist,
all of you can say whatever you want to say, and try and insult me. i find your insults humorous.
but i will continue to say,
this would will be on it’s way to being as our creator intended
once we have unity
we will have peace.
world rid of all “isms”-yes
govts in agreement-yes
world court-yes
arms gone-yes
peace on earth
unless we all decide this is what we want, none of us will be alive to witness it. but our grands will.
and isn’t that a grand thought?
i can understand why most of you feel hopeless, and cynical about the world.
but better days are just ahead.
try to join in.
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Ignore the lessons of history at your own peril.
Posted by: typicalamerican | November 10, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
etothex,
obama will be going to a memorial service for his grandmother in a few weeks.
and do you really care?
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
obama will either look like a genius or another bush.
It will be the latter. He should not be giving out welfare to everything that is need, but lowering the taxes on everything, reduce spending and downsize the government.
Posted by: James | November 10, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
One planet…
None of those were insults, just facts. Check your facts and history. There is nothing amusing in that. I have legitimate concerns that I just “hope” away and will “change” on their own. I fear for my children whenever adults cannot take care of themselves, let alone innocents. I cannot understand your logic in turning and looking away only hoping for the problems to be gone, and not interrupt your lifestyle. Sad.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
one planet,
i am not cynical, nor am i down about the future. i AM ever vigilant. i am also a bit of a student of history.
what you want is great, but before you can have it, you need to change human nature. utopia is a great goal, but until you have removed all ego, ambition, and megalomania from the world, it is a dream.
go on and have your dream, but while you are awake, try to live in the real world. there is evil and until you figure out how to conquer it, you must defend against it.
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Where will this new army come from? I suppose he will bankrupt this country enough that in walks China and their army.
Posted by: Do you truely know him? | November 10, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
These crazed Republicans have gone off the deep end. It’s no wonder they lost the election.
Posted by: HonestAbe | November 10, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
When you read the postings to this forum, only 2 Obamanation supporters even bother to posit anything even resembling a plausible explanation for Obama’s “civilian national security force, as powerful and well-funded as our military” speech. Even these posters fall short of justifying the words that Obama used in describing the force. The rest of the Obama-ites in this forum have no idea whether he did or didn’t intend something ominous by what he was proposing, but they rush to defend him (or should I say “Him”) anyway, while insulting those who are concerned about this. Since this story has been widely circulated since 3 days prior to the election, what if someone in the press had actually done their job, and asked Obama to explain what he was talking about in the video? No, that would never happen. What if Obama or at least someone on his team, would have bothered to reassure the concerned people and explain what he “really meant”? Maybe that would have been a good idea? Maybe that wouldn’t have left a vacuum that resulted in the the concerns and fears that some ten days later have led to a Congressman giving voice to them? The silence on Obama’s part since this issue was raised, and the failure of the Obama-worshipping press to even ask him about it, left reasonable persons to be very concerned. Any person with a modicum of reason would have to admit that the video in circulation paints an ominous picture, absent a response and explanation from Obama. His failure to explain this is a failure of leadership. His own statements about his (hopefully past) affinity for Marxist professors, have certainly generated cause for concern amongst reasonable persons – as did his comments about spreading the wealth around, calling people concerned about higher taxes “selfish”, saying that the US Constitution was fundamentally flawed because it didn’t endorse “wealth re-distribution”. These things, and his language, all paint a picture of a man who at the very least was substantially influenced by Marxist thought. It doesn’t help that his biggest role model is the disgusting America-hater and bigot, Jeremiah Wright. If Obama’s supporters were rational people, they might stop to consider these things before attacking those with concerns.
Posted by: Greg | November 10, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I commend Broun for putting a spotlight on this critical issue. He is doing hero’s work and has courage to speak up and take the heat he will receive.
Posted by: Max | November 10, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
As an American who sat through many nights of watching CNN’s ticker roll the terror alert color codes of “yellow” and “orange” post 9/11 and through our deployment of troops to Afghanistan and Iraq, I realized we were not well manned and armed for an attack on American soil.
It makes sense to have a homeland security force since we have to prepare ourselves for the inevitable.
Obama is very smart and believes in taking care of home first. So many of the GOP representatives are out of touch
and afraid of change; hence Broud’s offbase assessment of what Obama proposes to do to ensure homeland security coverage. The new force would also create new jobs.
Posted by: clarity | November 10, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Is it any wonder the Republicans have lost power? They have turned into a party of frightened simpletons. He’s just desperate to compare Obama to the worst dicators in human history and he’ll grasp at straws to do it. I’m not going to pretend there haven’t been nuts on the left doing the same with Bush, but never an elected Congressman.
Posted by: Mike | November 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Eugene,
What parts of the rest of the world have you been to over the last 10 years? I am curious. Are you speaking from personal experience and conversation, or simply what you see on CNN, etc. I have traveled extensively and do not see what you have.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Uh, people, please! History buffs, check your facts. What could be his motive? This guy is a university professor by trade who spent his early years out of school doing community service, sacrificing his time and energy, his only promise of recompense being the satisfaction of helping someone in need. This is not the earmark of a power-hungry dictator. Match these things to the backgrounds of the megalomaniacs you are attempting to draw parallels to. Sorry, this is ridiculous. He simply does not fit the mold. I can’t even believe people are taking this lunatics comments seriously.
On the other hand, consider the background of our current president, who comes from a family that has for generations made it their purpose to increase their wealth, stature, position and power, and wonder why people have been afraid of him.
This is the latest in the trend of the right to take anything the left says, and replys, “I know you are but what am I? Sort of like McCain trying to run on a platform of change. Seriously, does anyone actually fall for this stuff?
Posted by: Dave | November 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
The whole news media has sold us down the river.
Posted by: midwestlady | November 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Eugene, you can attribute it to racism if you really need to (because that’s just too easy to play the race card, isn’t it?), but many, many people see this guy for what he is. We really can’t help you once you’ve been sucked in — and believe me, I wouldn’t even get in that line to help you after all you’ve done to help perpetrate this waxing disaster.
Posted by: William | November 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Can we PLEASE.. PLEASE give him a chance How many of you can name GWB Chief of staff? but there has been a big deal about the Puppy to the white house…last I checked our government has checks and Balances
Posted by: Mvpsdad | November 10, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
I never suggested turning away from genocide, or any other terrible thing that happens in this world.
i just mean to say there are a lot of NGO out there doing a lot of good work.
and the day will come with much work toward it, when warring will be the LAST option. after more ways for peace have been tried.
working toware peace WILL win out over war-sooner than you think.
I think we will have a few more conflicts-and after them the world leaders will see the point in war is counter productive to humanity, the world will lose it’ taste for war,
and then peace will begin to be the order of the day.
I know you all cannot see it, because you have not been involved with groups who are working to these ends.
but it will come.
I do believe people will be allowed to protect home.
and nations have just enough weapons to do as i listed before. but no more.
soon-the profit making of war will end.
and with the other things I listed our planet will be on it’s way to peace.
but i never suggested take a sit back and watch attitude.
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Man , what’s goin on? I keep looking for the unicorns out back. And my wife said the mortage bill just came.And my trucks actually needs gas! WA HAPPIN? I thought the Messiah was gonna fix all this stuff, just by virtue of being elected? Well at least i can join the civilian corps of death, and get me some of those gold boots! Cool man.
Posted by: marine43 | November 10, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Wow, so this is where the lunatic fringe hangs out…here and in their parents’ basement. Here’s a bit of info for your fragile young minds from the AP: Obama was refering to civilian reserve corps that could handle postwar reconstruction efforts such as rebuilding infrastructure — an idea endorsed by the Bush administration.
Posted by: Rich | November 10, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
what do you do cherry pick drudge and fox? come on is this news? we just had bush take us to war with lies and run the debt up 5 trillion and now the treasury cut rates for banks without the congress knowing.
Posted by: william | November 10, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
To Dr. Kat and the others who seem blinded by the Messianic light.
Why is it that pointing out Obama’s own words, his own voting record, his own alliances and associations, his own stated agenda from his own website somehow makes us stupid?
Good job js pulling the race card, that’s soooo yesterday dude….
Posted by: Buffoon | November 10, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Marine 43- my truck needs gas too! I hope that it can wait until January when all of my financial concerns will be solved by “Messiah Vouchers” via executive order@
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
rider,
the evil is within us, we have the good and the bad in us. and we can choose to let the lower nature rule or the higher nature.
eventually, we will see the need for the higher nature to rule, if humanity is to survive.
then we will be on the road to peace.
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
You people spouting all this crap are scary. What do you think Obama is going to do with all his power? Chain you up, shoot you down, kill your family members, imprison all you know? Is he going to imprison people for spouting all this garbage and slander you all do? Are you nuts? We don’t have the room to hold the lot of you so you’re safe. Why is he the anti-christ? and why is religion even in the political realm? That worked really well for Elizabeth Dole. The man isn’t even in office yet and you all have him proclaiming a death sentence to each and every one of you! You are alarmists and love to be in the middle of strife you create all by yourselves. Apparently your Bush on a pedestal wasn’t afraid to meet with him….
Posted by: A Kind Word | November 10, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Come on. Admit it, most of those on this board bought into the recent Bigfoot hoax and the Obama is a Muslim nonsense. There is no end to the craziness! No need for rational thought. It’s easier to cast nonsensical aspersions because we just can’t stand the guy.
Posted by: richard | November 10, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Dear Marine43,
Well, since my vouchers haven’t arrived yet, and I must still get to work on time in the morning, I am leaving this blog and getting some shut-eye. If my vouchers arrive early, I’ll share with you- just like a garden fresh tomato.
Good night Mr. Obama. I hope that our comments were acceptable this evening.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
This isn’t lunacy: this is absolutely possible. He just appointed a Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who has endorsed the same thing, but much more explicitly. Read the book “A Plan for America.” His campaign was a classic Marxist campaign: banners with his face in various shadings everywhere, lots of talk about “change” and “hope”. It’s coming, and this man will look like less of a nutball. But I wonder how many of these hero-worshippers will just fall in line and justify the ever-increasing grabs for power. Some on here are already justifying this “civilian force”. These will be the collaborators who we will have to answer to when they come to check on what we are up to and whether we are giving the appropriate consent to our new Fuhrer…oops, President.
Posted by: Giggles | November 10, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Motivations of the greatest good can cause the greatest harm if they coalesce the power to limit the freedoms of the people in one hand. Good motivations can blind people to the ramifications of their actions until it is too late.
That being said, if we remind ourselves and others, and safeguard our liberties we can work as a house united to solve the problems we face today. Don’t let paranoia tear us apart.
Posted by: Lapsus | November 10, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
now richard,
don’t be so hard on our friends,
i’ll bet many of them voted for mccain.
and many voted for bush,
now after this eight years and everyone is worse off, and all any of us could do while, bush,rummy,condi,brownie,cheney, the whole lot of them, ran ruff shod over this country, they should be skeptical.
anyone that voted for bush in 2000
and 2004 should not trust govt.
i know if i had voted for bush, i would not be able to trust govt.right now.
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Oh crap , Forgot to wish all bretherin a hardy Semper Fi! Today is our birthday! Damn and here i am sober! MARINE43 OUT.
Posted by: marine43 | November 10, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
One of the most repulsive things about Obama supporters, is their knee-jerk claim that anytime anyone says they disagree with Obama or they don’t support him, they must be a racist. Obama supporters will rush to say this, in the complete absence of any reasonable cause or evidence to support their reprehensible and baseless accusation. It’s just automatic with so many of them, and what it suggests is that it is they who are actually the bigots. They are bigots, and they know that they are bigots, so they assume that people who disagree with their point of view must be bigots too. What if I think abortion is morally reprehensible? What if I think that taxation and the size of government are way out of control? What if I dislike the fact that Obama deliberately sought out Marxist professors as his closest friends? What if I am afraid of what happens in Iraq if our troops are pulled out too quickly and al Qaeda takes over? What if it worries me that Obama’s main mentor is a racist, America hating jerk? What if I think Obama’s short time in the Senate is insufficient to prepare him to lead this country? What if I feel that too little is known about him? What if I disagree with his political philosophy? In the feeble minds of WAY too many Obama supporters, this automatically means that the person must be a racist. Perhaps that is the far more prevalent form of “Obama derangement syndrome”.
Posted by: Greg | November 10, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
One planet…
I was fine until the Dem congress got a hold of their power trip. That’s how I spell abuse. Altmeyer is Pelosi’s little puppet, sickening.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Carl Rove and Cheney spent a lot of time building the Republican Slime & Fear machine to keep us from realizing what we really elected back in 00 & 04.
It is very hard to turn this off with all the locksteppers.
Posted by: Rob | November 10, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Greg-
EXCELLENT AND 100% TRUE.
Thanks for posting it. My knuckles are sore from dragging them all day… :)
All true buddy, your points really irritate me. Especially how snide they are, disgusting. Thanks again.
Posted by: David | November 10, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Prediction:
Within two years, the draft will be reinstated, and people will be allowed to “enlist” in Obama’s “national security force” rather than the military, where they will be a fully taxpayer-funded and militarized version of ACORN.
Funny how liberals who are hysterical about a few hundred terrorists being deprived of their freedom at Guantanamo will not blink an eye over millions of American young people being deprived of their freedom for years out of their lives to serve as Obama’s minions of change!
Posted by: AnnJo | November 10, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
just a reminder that campaign promises
by all politicians are generally made to get the most votes possible . If Obama finds that most people would be justifiably alarmed by his powerful national militia proposal its doubtful he would pursue it , at least not overtly even if he could afford it financially . Hopfully he will be surrounded by enough logical and truly patriotic staffers that his 20 years of Rev Wright rhetoric can be deprogrammed from his subconcious quickly
Posted by: balanced | November 10, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
What the? This person was elected? By actual voters? Seriously? That isn’t even a differing opinion on policy, which would make sense. Nobody is going to totally agree on every single issue, but this is not disagreement, it’s the rant of someone who’s been out in the sun too long.
Posted by: learningisjoy | November 10, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
To Mr. Broun and people that align with your views/mentality:
Look, the election is over. How is this view different from any other thing the McCain-Palin campaign tried to introduce against Obama? You are a Republican, and if this is any indication that the rest of the party is along your way of thinking then you have lost my support for your party.
Seriously, the Broun’s of this country should suck it up! Obama has won and it is time to rally behind the President-Elect. I really hope the Republican party looks hard within, especially a hard-look at people like the Broun’s of this country.
Posted by: Mike | November 10, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
I feel pretty confident in predicting that Republicans are going to continue losing, election after election, until there are serious changes in their party.
Considering the “thought” processes of that party’s supporters, showcased here and all over the web, it’ll probably be a while.
Posted by: Sportin' Life | November 10, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
ok david,
i respect you point. I saw not only govt. abuse of power, but neglect of power. and it was before the dem. congress came in.
I have not been pleased with Nancy P.
and would like to see her replaced.
but govt. neglect, abuse, and favortism for friends and few I have seen with the bush white house.
and if there is anything good now to come from the bush white house, is his adm. was so bad, it now has all american engaged in the political process, and everyone now has to pay attention.
and that is a good thing,
talk about germany 1930′-
after 911-when we should have all been paying attention, and engaged in the conversation about going to war, in IRAQ? when everything said bin laden was elsewhere. during those day-and right up until the day David Gregory asked the question of bush, and bush said, (in his voice of-for once and for all stop asking me this question)
No there were no WMD’
at that time, if you were not sure we should be going to war, you chanced having someone say you were not a patriot. so you just kept your mouth closed, or talked among close friends,
while you watched your country invade another country.
now that is what i call abuse of power
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
one planet,
we do all have good and evil in us. we do not all have faith that good will win out in all. of course, if we kill all the evil people, we can screen for that “good” gene!
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Another Whack Job Republican…where do they find these people…they need to start charging guys like Broun with hate crimes and inciting violence, or at least a hefty civil suit for defamation of character
Posted by: Cindy | November 10, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
mike, i had to laugh at your “suck it up” comment. after 8 years of listening to the left whine about how bush stole the election….good one. we all need a little humor.
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Have any of you mouth-foaming Republican ranters ever actually read anything written by Karl Marx? Just wondering. If any of you have the first clue what you’re talking about on the subject of Marxism, it’s not coming across.
Posted by: Sportin' Life | November 10, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
I will agree with Greg that calling anyone who is against Obama a racist is disgusting and manipulative – just as disgusting and manipulative as calling anyone who is disagrees with Bush unpatriotic or unamerican, as I’ve had to bear for the past 8 years. Did you have a problem with that, Greg, or was that OK? Oh, and how do you know Senator Obama so well that you can identify his best friends and main mentor? Do you pal around with this Marxist. Greg? Do you just buy in to the rhetoric of the right? Or are you simply just as manipulative as those you attempt to decry?
Posted by: Dave | November 10, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
this guy is a true Republican/Conservative Fundamentalist ‘head-case…….
here’s a few “Broun-isms”…take a deep breath!
10th Congressional District Republican incumbent Rep. Paul Broun is loud and proud when it comes to Jesus. Last year he promised to subject all legislation that passes his desk to a Biblical test
Yesterday, Broun pushed his overbearing Jesusness to new levels of stupidity when he accused his opponent, State Rep. Barry Fleming, R-Harlem, of not being a real Christian.
Paul Broun, R-Georgia, government-assisted masturbation (in the form of pornographic magazine sales at military facilities) is “denigrating the moral standing of our troops both here and abroad.”
To protect America’s servicemen and women from rubbing one out on Uncle Sam, Broun has proposed something called the Military Honor and Decency Act.
Broun continues to step out on the narrow end of the limb. This week, he introduced a bill to ban abortion. That’s right, his “Sanctity of Human Life Act” declares that fertilized ova are entitled to the constitutional promise of life, liberty, etc.
Posted by: Blue | November 10, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
It is strange that so many here jump onto the racist accusations, mocking and degrading this person as if the entire well of intelligence must be a Dem commodity. How well and above the fray you think of yourselves. It isn’t fear-mongering when it is true. Had any of you looked it up before spouting your crap, you would know tht is exactly what Obama said. Nobody forced him to say it(just like the spread the wealth comment), he did it himself. So please close your ears and giggle over conservatives, but if he implements all the things he has said and stays as far to the left as his record shows, you’ll be waking up soon enough
Posted by: michigan mom | November 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Mark Twain once observed that, “History never repeats itself. It merely rhymes.”
People who have never learned history or have been fed a revisionist version of it are doomed to repeat it.
Go find a true history lesson on the Weimar Republic of Post WWI Germany.
Only then can you have an informed and intelligent perspective on where we stand today.
Posted by: Sovereign | November 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I can hear goose steppers in all 58 states!
No more infidels!
Way too kool! Goose Goose Goose!
Posted by: Joe bomacon | November 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
rider,
i know with the last line you were trying to be funny.
but of course i don’t think it is a good gene.
but i do think people have to learn what leads to the higher nature, and how to put down the lower nature, (and this is something we will all struggle with until our last breathe-but struggle we must)
everyone has a choice each day, to decide how they will treat their fellow humans.
if we don’t try to decide today i will treat all i meet with respect. that lower nature will tell you everytime-if someone crosses you-get them back.
evil is the higher nature warring with the lower nature. and most of the time ego will help the lower nature win out everytime.
“when thought of war come-replace them with a stronger thought of peace.”
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Beware America
Be Aware!
Posted by: david | November 10, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
one planet, i wish you well. hope a plane and see if you can impress a bit of higher nature on some islamic radicals, or maybe a few rebels in the congo. let me know how that works out.
blue, that looks like a cut and paste job. it’s probably better to make a point with an article that is not written from a blatantly biased point of view. try a cut and paste from the congressional record next time. all those pejoratives blur the point you are trying to make.
Posted by: rider237 | November 10, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
rider,
for example,
read some of these post on here, and pick out which nature was ruling.
higher or lower.
we were given this tool-it is suppose to be an advancement for humanity,
but look how many use it.
one human insulting another, back and forth, they go into the late hours of the night.
unlike me, I must say goodnight
Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 10, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Cindy says, “they need to start charging guys like Broun with hate crimes and inciting violence, or at least a hefty civil suit for defamation of character.”
Absolutely – let’s release those poor misunderstod terrorists at Guantanamo and send people like Broun there. Anybody who suggests Obama might have totalitarian inclinations should not be left at large; he should be locked up along with all his family and friends.
Because with supporters like Cindy, who could possibly think Obama might be a totalitarian?
Posted by: AnnJo | November 10, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Wow! Responses here are amazing. Don’t you know your small arms can’t do anything against the modern government. Just look at how the FBI has been crushing survivalist/religious separatist types in recent history. Think of Ruby Ridge, Waco, etc…. And some of these guys had automatics.
And it was Bush who recently took away the real weapons from the few rich Americans who owned them, like decommissioned F-16s. He was afraid they might get sold to foreign powers; well that was his justification anyway! He even took them away from science museums!
Gun lovers: Bush just took any good stuff from you under the excuse of fighting terrorism. And you bought it! You support him. You think that you are armed, when all you have are pee-shooters. Yeah right! Give it up fools, you already lost your rights to any real guns. Show me your artillery, your tanks, your high explosive bombs and mines. You don’t have any. You don’t have any real armaments.
Oh, and the US already has a secret police force. It’s called the FBI.
This whole line of crap from Broun looks like the kind of fear mongering designed to make people militant against Obama. How traitors of Broun. And you people who were all so about supporting the President and Chief– well, I guess you meant as long as it was the one(s) who brainwashed you, namely Bush and the neocos. You don’t even stand by your own values.
You guys are just brown shirt wannabees.
Weak.
PS Oh, and Jake, do you really get off fanning the flames of hatred in these Neanderthals that much? It’s a dangerous game, my friend. Beware of your pulpit and be more responsible. This sort of inflammatory propaganda does not need more distribution. Apparently you can’t tell the difference between news and repeating propaganda.
Is Broun’s hatred and propaganda news? Broun makes wild projections designed to stir up fear in the ignorant. Is it news when someone yells “fire” in a crowded theater? You mostly just quoted Broun. You basically printed: “Fire! Fire!”, and got the weak minded and ignorant riled up. Just look at the responses. That’s yellow journalism. It’s irresponsible. Grow up or get another job. Oh, and btw, I wasn’t informed by your article. The nutters are all around. I don’t need a lousy hate-stirring newspaper article to remind me. Your article sucked. Fourth estate indeed!
Posted by: Duane | November 10, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Broun is a nutcase with a bad memory. I seem to remember that GWBush was hoping to orient the national guard forces into posse comitatus troops. In fact, this may just have actually occurred horribly, given Bush’s propensity for secretive underhandedness in his administration. For Broun to accuse Obama of something like a secret militaristic force for a US dictatorship only shows a feeble mind who has no business representing the decent people of Georgia. Especially when that small intellect – Broun – fear mongers about something his own erstwhile Loser In Chief Bush did exactly what Broun suggests. Forgive me sounding partisan, but these Republican extremists like this man are total whacks. As whacky as GWBush if not more so.
Posted by: buzziea | November 10, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Great. Normal, patriotic Americans are being called deranged by people at ABC. What a SHOCK! Quel Surprise! Whatever.
Posted by: deranged american idiot | November 11, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
I think it is irresponsible of Broun to spout this stuff. This is a time to work together and find away out of what might be the worst economic problems of our lifetime. I haven’t heard Obama say anything about taking guns. In times like this stirring fear in people is close to treason. If Obama trys to take inordinate amounts of power the people like me who voted fro him will oppose him. I think what most conservatives miss is that Obama won both the popular vote and the electorial votes by gaining the support of middle Americans like me. Far right conservatives are a minority and if Republicans continue on the course of pandering to the far right there will be even fewer Republicans in office.
Posted by: CHRIS | November 11, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Okay, twinkies, lets get a hold of ourselves. Obama was talking about something more akin to the peace corp. You hallucination is so weird.
Your guns will not be taken from you, your freedom of speach will expand not diminish. He is not a socialist or a marxist.
The country will recover, expand, and be free. Your guns are safe. Just no hand held atomic weapons. Suddenly, the eyes flit from place to place, “see you admit he wants to take our weapons.” Paranoia runs very deep in American veins. Wa ha ha ha….
Posted by: kyle samuels | November 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
rider237
re: “……blatantly biased point of view. try a cut and paste from the congressional record next time. all those pejoratives blur the point you are trying to make.”
what pejoratives? it’s as completely fair as
Brouns analogy….. of course it was copied as it expressed my sentiments so much better than I could myself…… what? you don’t agree?
Posted by: Blue | November 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
What an appropriate piece on the 70th anniversary of Kristalnaught. Broun is the facist.
Normal patriotic Americans? I’d call Max Cleland, a pretty patriotic guy. So did the old John McCain – who said “I’d never seen anything like that ad. Putting pictures of Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden next to the picture of a man who left three limbs on the battlefield — it’s worse than disgraceful. It’s reprehensible.” Reprehensible.
– Sen. John McCain, quoted by CNN, on the campaign ads used by Saxby Chambliss (R) against Sen. Max Cleland (D-GA) in the 2002 U.S. Senate race.
I thought John McCain would come back. This time he’s lingin right up for the man who slaughtered and slandered his friend. I’m sad that I was wrong.
Posted by: Mara | November 11, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Arg, Deranged, there’s that word again – Patriotic. Stop it already, it’s lost all meaning after having been misused and abused by the Bush administration all these years, not to mention the GOP campaign that just failed so miserably. Nobody falls for that anymore. Calling someone Patriotic or Unpatriotic is just shorthand for saying “in my party” or “in the other party”. At lesat for the right.
Posted by: Dave | November 11, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Oh Dave, poor little Dave. Don’t assume that everyone out there is as myopic or one-dimensional as you are. I agree with you that “calling anyone who disagrees with Bush unpatriotic or unamerican”, is very wrong. To do so offends my somewhat moderately conservative sensibilities. I’m simply not up for being the doctrinaire party servant that you are. Additionally, I was offended enough by aspects of Bush’s first term in office that I didn’t vote at all in 2004 (couldn’t stomach voting for Kerry, though). Since then, I’ve also been offended by aspects of Bush’s 2nd term. Now, to answer your oh-so-challenging question of “how I know Senator Obama so well that I can identify his best friends and main mentor?” Get ready, because I am about to astound you with my sheer genius. The answer? I actually read his books, and watched and listened to several of his interviews. They were his direct words. You would have known that these were the sources for my information, if you were an informed, curious person – but alas, clearly you are not.
Posted by: Greg | November 11, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
You know those dogs who have been abused from puppyhood and cower and cringe, showing their submissiveness and surrender? Yes, they are pitiful, but they are also contemptible. They almost invite a kick. As a civilized and humane person, I would never deliver it, but there always have been and always will be those who are not quite so civilized and humane, those who lack pity and overflow with contempt for weakness.
God help this country if its enemies ever conclude that is the true America.
Posted by: AnnJo | November 11, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I am just wondering what all the fuss is about. Obama has clearly stated what he intends to do. The media and his supporters don’t want to know anymore about it because of what it means. Hence all of the horror that someone has pointed out this strange Obama vision for a national first-time-ever security corps. Once it is place, it will never go away. That is why it has never been allowed before in America. A national civilian security corps reporting to the top man. Does that sound good?
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
This is nonsense. I guess a lot of people dont know what socialism is? Because Obama wants to give tax breaks to Americans, he is now a socialist. I just feel everyone in America should have a right to education. With Education, you will never grant audience to this nuts. Nobody calls Bush a Socialist for executing the biggest Socialist agenda, they should also remove Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security benefits, lest you dont know, they are all Socialist agendas. Stupid! We need Education in this country.
Posted by: vuzous | November 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
obama said
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” Obama said in July. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
that sounds like the peace corps?
Posted by: rider237 | November 11, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
How do idiots like this get elected? I guess Georgia hasn’t entered the 21st Century as of yet. I take that back. Georgia hasn’t entered the 20th Century yet. You would think that a member of congress would have to score above feeble-minded on an IQ test before being on a ballot. But in Georgia the opposite seems to be true.
Posted by: Jim Dandy | November 11, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Broun’s fearful analogy is incorrect:
He should have compared Obama to the Xia Dynasty of early China instead of Hitler.
‘an important milestone in the history of Chinese civilization and marks the end of the Primitive Society and the beginning of the Class Society.’
c’mon now it’s obvious, isn’t it…..any real patriotic American would understand this.
Posted by: Blue | November 11, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Duane – I don’t agree with everything you say – but I absolutely agree that this site has done absolutely everything it can to fuel the fires of hatred and division. What is even more disturbing is that they seem to thrive on it – it is their niche. There were plenty of legitimate stories that could have been covered this week – take a look at the stories that are covered instead. This comment will almost certainly be cut – but violence, hate speech, innudendo, copied lists from bottom feeder blogs – intended to rip America apart – are all welcome.
Posted by: Mara | November 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
There is nothing civilized or humane in a person who thinks a cowered puppy, invites a kick.
Posted by: What? | November 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Just the kind of piece I would expect from an “objective” news source like ABC.
I’ve just learned to ignore these incompetent, unobjective, non-professional play journalists.
Posted by: Dave L | November 11, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
With people like this, am not surprised why the Sarah Palin i saw on fox news today is the future of the GOP
Posted by: vuzous | November 11, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I’m a reasonable person and I sincerely hope that Obama succeeds in solving some of the daunting problems we now have. I will applaud him if he does.
However, I’m a little nervous and wonder what what Obama really has in mind. The possibility of the Fairness Doctrine, an internal National Security Force, required youth service and income redistribution have unavoidable parallels to dark times in history. I hope I’m wrong and this is all overreaction but some of what I’m seeing is alarming. There are early hints that Obama may be getting ready to rule rather than govern. We’ll see.
Posted by: Janny | November 11, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Scooterfoot – I agree. But it’s not gonna happen. This is not the place for serious journalism. Look at the stories of the week. Americans showed pretty clearly that they could care less about Ayers, but what do we get in a week when news outlets around the world are really reporting on America? More of the same. Maybe next week we’ll be back to church bulletins. Or whether Obama really smokes. Or what Angelina Jolie has to say about the world.
The White House correspondent for this network went on national TV and said the President-elect was an SOB. What do you expect?
Posted by: Mara | November 11, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Can we all please just say no to the fear? Truly, it’s exhausting. A civilian police force does not equate to a Gestapo. It’s about getting people involved so that they’re invested in their own communities. Until that happens, can we all please just let go of the irrational fear? Give the guy a chance. Obama’s not a hater. He’s inspired so many people because his message is about hope, and bringing people together. It’s a good thing.
Posted by: Carmella Kent | November 11, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
blue, lot of blood shed on the way and after. i was actually thinking you were referring to building the military and fighting our neighbors and folks in this country that didn’t toe the line!
didn’t realize you could pick and choose the bits of history that fit your agenda.
not sure i’d pick Chinese history as a comparison. is it the dynasties, or the communism that we should admire?
Posted by: rider237 | November 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Fear Mongering is the only tactic that GOP has?
As a democrat, I want a sound opposion party, not pathetic, stupid one.
Posted by: jj | November 11, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
This is wonderful.
The election was basically a kind of national intelligence test – and it appears that many of those who flunked are posting here.
Sort of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade.
Well, carry on.
Posted by: Bob32 | November 11, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Janny,
why can’t obama just have the desire to do good for the country in mind? and not all of this covert stuff people keeping bring up.
and on the rule or govern bit.
after eight year of i don’t know now what to call it. it is about time someone had ruling or governing in mind.
because we picked the lost to lead us and we have been lead into the wilderness.
Posted by: What? | November 11, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Stupid is the face of the GOP today…
Where are the intelligent ones?
Boby Jindal is the only hope.
Posted by: jj | November 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Jake:
re: “We already need a name for the reverse disorder.”
here ya go: ‘dis-associative Obamanoia’
symptoms include:
- unreasoned comparisons of Obama to all fascist, marxist and communist societies
- paranoid fear of a non-existent Obama secret police force
- also manifests itself with a strong fear of Pelosi, Reid and Frank
- predisposition indicated for making up rhymes with the name Obama
- unreasoned assumptions as to who is ‘American”
Posted by: Blue | November 11, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
I skimmed the comments section and all I saw were a bunch of people bashing the guy who made these remarks.
So no one finds it odd that the President-elect (who God willing will be proven as a fraud before inauguration) of the world’s strongest military force, feels the need to create a new military force at the civilian level? That doesn’t alarm any of you? Talk about fear-mongering; what could possibly be his rationale for this?
Posted by: H. Rand | November 11, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
This is Karl Rove’s legacy. He controlled the Republican base by feeding them lies and urban legends.
Now they’re so poisoned by his toxic game that they don’t know which way is up.
Rove mocked the “reality-based community” because he deals strictly in fantasy.
The GOP is now the party of paranoid delusion.
YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW.
Posted by: R Mutt | November 11, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
I guess the gun buyers are getting ready for the next Civil War, to be fought in 2012. Red against Blue. Appropriate, since one of Obama’s heros is Lincoln.
Obamas’s policies are more Christian than Socialist, but those who complain the loudest also call themselves Christians. His plan of restoring taxes on the wealthy to pre-Bush levels fits what Christ taught. “Love your neighbor as yourself.” “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” “Sell all you own, give it to the poor, and come follow me.”. To those who are spreading the hate and fear, go back to the bible and read it again, and this time read what Christ told you to do. You may find that the spirit of the anti-christ that John talked about is in you, not Obama.
Posted by: prophet1 | November 11, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Broun is the type of Georgian whose relatives only recently got their hands on that “new invention” toilet paper.
Posted by: Paul | November 11, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
here is what has me a bit concerned; it is three-fold.
First, any of Obama’s supporters get downright hostile when anyone brings an issue to the forefront when it might otherwise be considered to be legit. They say worse about President Bush but that is alright in their book. Don’t say anything negative about the messiah or you get slapped down verbally and otherwise by anyone with that all too familiar dazed and confused look so prevelant these days.
Second, Obama’s ‘Truth Squad.’ Back in June and July Obama wanted people in Missouri arrested who said anything negative about him that HE considered to be a lie. Nevermind whether it was provable fact, if he considered it a lie, he actually went to the state attorney general and the state police seeking to have folks arrested for their WORDS.
Third, folks like Joe the Plumber will find it increasing more difficult to be critical of President Elect Obama. Truth be damned, if it is critical or embarrassing toward the new Commander in Chief it will be subject to further scrutiny (if you follow my drift).
Those three things and much more should have us all concerned. It happened before in the worlds history and those who forget what happened are much more likely to fall prey to it in our generation.
Posted by: Bman | November 11, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
From among the millions of “raw” reports from American spies and their “assets” around the world came a CIA Middle East warning about a possible kamikaze-style air attack on a U.S. navy base at a south Pacific island location.
The only problem was that no such navy base existed on the island and no U.S. Seventh Fleet warship had ever been there.
In all seriousness, a U.S. military investigation earlier reported that Osama bin Laden had been spotted shopping at a post office on a U.S. military base in east Asia
Posted by: taker | November 11, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
The Homeland Security Administration, the TSA, the Coast Guard, Capitol Police Force, and yes even the National Park Rangers and in fact every Federal Agency has a contingent of its own “domestic” police force…or in other words a “national civilian force.”
The nut-job Mr. Broun lifted his talking points from wacky web sites that have carried such delusional discussions for the past year and a half…too bad that he doesn’t give source credit to his cohorts who are unapologetic “felons” and “skin heads.” Funny that now skin-heads have a spokesman but this congressional spokesman doesn’t want to give credit to his pals.
Posted by: who what where | November 11, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
President-elect Obama didn’t just say he wanted a civilian national security force. His exact words were: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
So President-elect Obama wants a civilian national security force that is at least 1 million strong with a budget of over $500 billion. AND he say he needs this force in addition to our military to enforce the national security objectives that they have set. WHAT are these objectives? WHY will it take such a force to achieve these objectives?
Unless and until President-elect Obama is forthright about what these objectives are we can only speculate. And since he said that this force will be “just as powerful” as our military, you have to assume that means it will be armed. Is he planning to use this force to run out the illegal immigrants? Probably not! Is he planning to stifle those who oppose his agenda? I pray not!
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Richard, what civil liberties and freedoms has President Bush taken from you / us?
And once again, the war in Iraq was not bogus NOR was it begun under false pretenses. We invaded Iraq under a UN mandate AND we did so because Saddam Hussein failed to comply with any of the conditions of the 1991 cease fire. President Bush, after 12 years of diplomatically attempting to convince Saddam Hussein to comply, terminated the cease fire and resumed the war.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
I’ll bet Broun freaked out over Y2K too. Alarmist much or what??
Does this doofus forget we had a national civilian security force from the start? Can you say Minutemen?????
Posted by: SMS | November 11, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
This congressman is no nutjob, good grief! OPEN your eyes…Obama has Marxist buddies & policies.
We have military, National Guard, policemen, Sheriffs & depts. of Public safety, we do not need YET ANOTHER security force & one as big as our military & as well funded?? It is Obama that is the peculiar one here, NOT this congressman.
Obama is a radical & he was voted into power from pure raw emotionalism. I am so very glad we have our first black president but I am as equally sorry it is who it is, a radical that leans more towards communism than being an American.
We needed a black president but wouldn’t ya know that we got the wrong one.
Posted by: Sharon Janech | November 11, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
After eight years of bitter derangement the liberals on this comment board have no right to judge anyone. You put politics before country, and all the lies about stolen elections, Iraq and the Patriot Act have assured only one thing – the right will do to your messiah what you did to President Bush and America. It’s going to be an ugly, angry four years.
Posted by: Evrviglnt | November 11, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
“Kofi Annan, the Secretary General of the United Nations, said of the U.S. attack of Iraq, “It was not in conformity with the U.N. charter. From the point of view of the United Nations, from the charter point of view, it was ILLEGAL.”
You’re blowing smoke James.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
why doesn’t Mr. Broun take his weird concerns to be investigated by his state’s very own Georgia Department of Law Enforcement…oh wait, that agency is a “well-funded” “civilian domestic force” too.
oh, oh, they’re here..
Posted by: who what where | November 11, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
George Bush managed to lose the support of the large majority of the people of the United States – people from all walks of life and political persuasions.
Bush’s approval rating is below 30%.
Over 70% of the citizens disapprove of what he’s done to their country.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
The central U.S. justification for launching the Iraq War was that Saddam Hussein’s alleged development of nuclear and biological weapons and purported ties to al-Qaeda made his regime a “grave and growing” threat to the United States and the world community. During the lead-up to the war and the aftermath of the invasion, critics cast doubt on the evidence supporting this rationale. Concerning Iraq’s weapons programs, prominent critics included Scott Ritter, a former U.N. weapons inspector who argued in 2002 that inspections had eliminated the nuclear and chemical weapons programs, and that evidence of their reconstitution would “have been eminently detectable by intelligence services ….” Although Saddam Hussein had earlier forced the IAEA weapons inspectors to leave Iraq, after the build up of U.S. troops in neighboring states, he welcomed them back and promised complete cooperation with their demands. Experienced IAEA inspection teams were already back in Iraq and had made some interim reports on its search for various forms of WMD. Joseph C. Wilson, an American diplomat investigated claims that Iraq had sought uranium for nuclear weapons in Niger and reported that they had no substance.The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee “found that Wilson’s report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case for most intelligence analysts.”Prior to the invasion, Wilson also argued that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.”
Similarly, alleged links between Iraq and al-Qaeda were called into question during the lead up to the war, and were largely discredited by an October 21, 2004 report from U.S. Senator Carl Levin, which was later corroborated by an April 2006 report from the Defense Department’s inspector general.These reports further alleged that Bush Administration officials, particularly former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith, manipulated evidence to support links between al-Qaeda and Iraq.
In August, 2008, journalist Ron Suskind published The Way of the World, in which he claims the Habbush letter was a forgery, created by the CIA on direct order of the President, to imply a tie between Al Qaeda and Iraq.
Lack of a U.N. mandate
One of the main questions in the lead-up to the war was whether the United Nations Security Council would authorize military intervention in Iraq. When it became increasingly clear that U.N. authorization would require significant further weapons inspections, and that the U.S. and Britain planned to invade Iraq regardless, many criticized their effort as unwise, immoral, and illegal. Robin Cook, then the leader of the British House of Commons and a former foreign secretary, resigned from Tony Blair’s cabinet in protest over Britain’s decision to invade without the authorization of a U.N. resolution. Cook said at the time that: “In principle I believe it is wrong to embark on military action without broad international support. In practice I believe it is against Britain’s interests to create a precedent for unilateral military action.”
United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said, when pressed in an interview with the BBC in September 2004, “[F]rom our point of view and from the Charter point of view [the war] was illegal.” This drew immediate criticism from the United States and was immediately played down.
Posted by: Iraq truth | November 11, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
re: marine43
And here’s to you. Semper Fi–do or die.
Posted by: davidsmark | November 11, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
anais:
I don’t think many people are crazy enough to fully trust politicians.
However, that was one of Obama’s main approaches – that people had lost trust in the political process, and that he wanted to attempt to restore it.
We’ll see how that goes . .. give it a chance.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
I do not think he is being paranoid. He is simply saying that he is concerned about what President Elect Obama said. What should be happening is a clarification on his part as to what he meant. He owes that to the American people. Remember that our elected officials are there to serve our interests. If Obama had been associated with domestic terrorists, racist religious figures, a fromer PLO spokesman and sympathizer then maybe no one would have been too concerned.
Posted by: WKL | November 11, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Now all the losers become cynics and conspiracy theorists. Joy!
You wonder why people are objectional to your ideas against Obama? Your attitudes. Change your attitudes. Be constructive. Then people will listen.
Don’t sound like sore losers that just can’t admit defeat. Everything that does not belong to you are bad. Yeah right. How presumptuous to assume that you are always right?
Posted by: Clem | November 11, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
and just a little bit more about Republicans and how they react after they butt in to someone else’s life: remember Terry Schiavo?
Musgrave couldn’t stand to have Mr. Schiavo sitting nearby, after joining the Republican government fundamentalists to interfere in his family life.
=================================
The fireworks began before the candidates’ debate even started. Last week Michael Schiavo took a seat only 15 feet away from Colorado Rep. Marilyn Musgrave—all the better to taunt her.
She had been an outspoken advocate of what Schiavo considered government intrusion in his wife Terri’s right-to-die case last year.
When Musgrave’s camp objected to Schiavo’s presence, one of the event hosts tried, unsuccessfully, to have a cop force him to change seats.
Though Musgrave wasn’t asked about Terri during the debate, Schiavo had already met his goal—evoking his wife’s case, and the privacy concerns it raised, for the press and the public. “What you went through is the epitome of what’s wrong with the country,” one man told him afterward.
Posted by: Blue | November 11, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Kofi Annan was wrong with his analysis. As a party to the 1991 Gulf War, the United States has the right to terminate the cease fire for cause. If we aren’t under a UN mandate why is it that the UN mandate ends on December 31st? Thus the scramble to come up with an agreement on keeping our troops in Iraq before the UN mandate ends.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
No James, the UN did not mandate ANY attack on Iraq. The UN came into play AFTER the attack in order to come on side in an attempt to bring some semblance of order into how the country would be administered.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
This is the “national service” Obama has spoken of. I can’t believe the paranoia on this site. Good grief!
“The Obama Administration will call on Americans to serve in order to meet the nation’s challenges. President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs like AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to help teachers in underserved schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and Veterans Corps. Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by setting a goal that all middle school and high school students do 50 hours of community service a year and by developing a plan so that all college students who conduct 100 hours of community service receive a universal and fully refundable tax credit ensuring that the first $4,000 of their college education is completely free. Obama will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.”
Posted by: treetracker | November 11, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
The real truth is that whether Iraq had WMDs or not was irrelevant. One of the conditions of the 1991 cease fire was that Iraq PROVE that it no longer had WMDs or the IAEA was to supervise the destruction of the WMDs. Neither occurred.
Now then as I just mentioned in my most recent post, if we are not under a UN mandate how is it that the Bush Administration and Iraq are scrambling to come up with a deal to keep our troops in Iraq BEFORE the UN mandate ends on December 31st if we don’t have a UN mandate?
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
I’ll bet Mr. Broun has never made the connection between the Ministry of Truth in the book 1984 and The Patriot Act.
I’ll also bet that he thinks it’s OK to keep American citizens in prison without trial, OK to kidnap foreign citizens and “render” them to torture and OK to eavesdrop without warrant on the phone and email of Americans.
Too bad he never heard Ben Franklin’s warning that those who would give up a bit of Liberty for a bit of security soon will have neither.
Posted by: joe | November 11, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Just read the 2002 Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
No James, the UN did not mandate ANY attack on Iraq. The UN came into play AFTER the attack in order to come on side in an attempt to bring some semblance of order into how the country would be administered.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
James:
United Nations Resolution 1511 (2003)was passed in October 2003, seven months after the attack on Iraq.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Evrviglnt, talking about putting politices before country, that’s exactly what Republican candidate John McCain did. Picking a totally unqualified Sara Palin to up his chance to win.
Lying? That’s exactly what John McCain campaign did. Have you thought carefully why so many people disregarded what McCain’s negative campaign has been spreading? Because most American’s know what they are – negative campaign – lies, spin, half-truth. Only the McCain faithful who refuse to think critically followed it, and many still do. Don’t you see how those people smeared Obama were smearing Palin in the past few days?
Ugly and angry four years? You convinced me there, judging from the existence of people like you. That’s the price of freedom. You are allowed to be angry and ugly and refuse to see the light of things. You won’t be taken to concentration camp like the author of this article cautions and implies to us. We can have a bet.
Posted by: Clem | November 11, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Dear cuse1727:
I need your help cuse. I’ve seen a number of posts in recent months, similar to yours, here. Like with your post, the others have criticized Bush and the Patriot Act for destroying civil liberties and making average people like me less free.
Now, my dilemma is a simple one. Ya see, me, my family and all my friends have yet to experience any diminished freedoms ’cause of the Patriot Act. And, unfortunately, not one person has come close to providing us with any specifics.
Now then, with this in mind, I thought a bright sounding person like you just might be able to enlighten us. Thus, if you don’t mind, cuse, could you give us some examples — heck, just one will do — of a freedom you’ve lost because of that treacherous Patriot Act?
Posted by: The Observer | November 11, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the
Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking — it is in large part an oil currency war. One of the
core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration’s goal of preventing further
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the
euro as an oil transaction currency standard.
Posted by: oil $'s = american blood | November 11, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
James & Pefros
A) The 2003 invasion of Iraq:
from March 20 to May 1, 2003.
B) UN Resolution 1511 (2003)
8 Oct, 2003
How did B authorized A, when B happened after A?
UN resolution 1511 was an after-fact recognition, NOT a UN authorization of the Iraq war. Please update your facts.
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
And so, to disagree with Obama is Obama Derangement Syndrome? To use Obama’s own words to point out a marxist trend is Obama Derangement Syndrome?
To resort to calling the Congressman names confirms the congressman’s point. Disagree, become the target of name calling.
This tactic is not unusual for liberals, because without substantive debate, they resort to name calling, like: Obama Derangement Syndrome
Think, yes think, about what Obama is saying. If you actually think, you will agree with the congressman’s point.
Posted by: OpposeThePolicy | November 11, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
clem:
that was exactly my point to James . .. there was NO United Nations mandate to attack Iraq . . . which is what James was claiming
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
speaking of Obama derangement:
remember this one:
“It sure is tragic that African Press International, a distinguished media group whose only apparent outlet is a recent free account on blogspot, never released those damaging Obama tapes.
One shudders to imagine the horrors revealed if someone would only forward their bank account information to cover a small transfer fee.”
Posted by: Blue | November 11, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
“No James, the UN did not mandate ANY attack on Iraq. The UN came into play AFTER the attack in order to come on side in an attempt to bring some semblance of order into how the country would be administered.”
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
When Bush proposed the same thing, I don’t recall a lot of negative comment coming from the deep South. In fact, most Republicans thought it was a great idea. I guess it sounds different coming from a Democrat. What goes around, comes around.
Posted by: jumping | November 11, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
OpposeThePolicy
re: If you actually think, you will agree with the congressman’s point.’
ok…. so your saying that you believe Obama is going to turn the U.S. into nazi germany… and your asking us to think?
where is blog security when you need them?
;-)
Posted by: dewde | November 11, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
I have been reading this and several other forums over the course of your election year. I am a Canadian, but like most Canadians, I take an interest in American political affairs.
It is sad to see that the level of political discourse in America has deteriorated to such an extremely low level. Reasoning, skepticism, and analysis has been replaced by paranoia, name-calling, partisan cliches and intolerance for alternate views. It seems to me difficult for a democracy to thrive without its citizens showing some capability for reasoned discourse.
It seems to me that it is as wrong-headed to assume that Obama’s proposed national security force is going to be some sort of gestapo as it is to assume that it can never evolve into one. Complacency about that possibility could lead to a failure to put in place the necessary legislative safeguards initially to ensure that it doesn’t happen in the future.
Complacency about potential adverse outcomes, and the chronic failure of your government to account for them in their planning and policies might be seen by some as one of the common threads running through many of America’s present plights – from the Iraq war to the collapse of the housing market to the present financial crisis.
I note that there are those who state that Obama’s election has somehow transcended race. Given the overwhelming proportion of African-Americans that voted for Obama, that hardly seems likely. I doubt that any particular racial group is going to be so predominately Democrat (or Republican for that matter). This is not to say that a racial motivation in voting for Obama is not understandable- even reasonable. The symbolic and historical significance of electing Obama to your presidency would be too great a factor for many to ignore. I don’t understand the difficulty in honestly acknowledging this. This does not suggest that Obama was not a worthy candidate or had one-dimensional appeal.
It is obvious that both candidates had their relative merits and each had much to admire. It is also obvious that many Americans embraced the idea that Obama represented a needed change of direction in America’s political leadership. Time will tell if the American electorate was correct.
In any event, now that the racial barrier to the presidency, has been broken, one can only hope that your future elections can be more focused on the merits of the candidates and not unduly influenced by racial considerations.
I hope this post hasn’t come across as too preachy. After reading a great deal of nonsense in the media, and in many of the discussion postings over the past several months, I felt I had to comment-even as an outside observer.
Posted by: iamcanadian | November 11, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
Mr. Tapper, the election coverage was ridiculously partisan and biased in Obama’s favor, and please don’t add to it by insulting the intelligence of conservatives by suggesting it’s ludicrous for anyone to believe Obama could be a Marxist. Any OBJECTIVE look at his life and career would raise that question. It’s plain and simple. Why would anyone running for president have a pro-communist band open and close for him at a rally, and be photographed with them, horrible examples for our young people and children, if he didn’t believe as they do and wasn’t confident that the media would cover for him? And why would he think that the government can require children (middle school and high school students) to do 50 hours of community service each year (as was originally written on his “change” site, on the America Serves page – he’s backed off of it a little since many people were outraged)? That’s the socialist mindset in a nutshell. Take something good, like charitable work, which has nothing whatsoever to do with government, and let the busybody government act like it’s of its own creation and then put it in charge of a big piece of it. This ISN’T the business of the government. Obama was elected president of a country, not the boss of a business of which all citizens are its employees. 50 hours is about an hour a week. Where will that hour come from? From learning time in school, or perhaps by cutting gym, when children don’t get enough exercise anyway these days? Or maybe from time outside of school? How will families manage that, and WHY should they to begin with? Why should government believe it can run their lives better for them, or that it needs to think or feel or be its mind, heart and soul for them? So many families already serve others in their own way, according to their own values. Would this community service requirement involve faith-based charities whose beliefs liberals don’t share, or would that be disallowed because of “separation of church and state.” But anyway, this needs to be said again: when did government acquire the right to force people, especially children, to serve others?! People are their own best judges of how to use their time and other resources, as our Constitution guarantees.
On this particular concern, did or did not Obama say that “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” That line was removed from the Call to Renewal transcript (“Obama’s ‘Big Brother’ vanishes from speech,” Worldnetdaily), which simply isn’t honest. The video of the speech is on the internet (Senator Obama’s “Civilian National Security Force”) – although I happen to be having trouble accessing the page now – and he said it at about the 16 minute mark.
The problem here, then, is not deranged conservatives, but just the truth, and that it could hurt Obama and the Democrats. Most Americans don’t like Marxism and much of liberalism, which the left-wing media knows. That’s why any policies advancing Marxist, socialist and communist ideas will never be called by such names, and why Democratic politicians get up in arms whenever anyone suggests they’re anything but moderate and mainstream. And it’s also why Republicans have a base and Democrats don’t. The Republican base hasn’t hidden itself. It’s well-known, and been targeted by the left. The liberal base, a prime example of which is Bill Ayers since his Weatherman days, tries to deny its existence. Yet you have, for example, the whole liberal base calling for drastic cuts in military spending, and you have Barney Frank suggesting a 25% cut.
Obama’s Marxist connections were all either suppressed or spun by the left-wing media, who have put him on a pedestal. He HIMSELF ran for state senate in Illinois as a Democratic Socialist-sponsored “New Party” candidate (“Web Archives Confirm Barack Obama Was Member Of Socialist ‘New Party’ In 1996,” “Politically Drunk on Power” blog). He himself also favored “major redistributive change,” as he said in those radio tapes from 2001, and in which he also said that the Constitution seemed to put up a roadblock to such change – *at least it has been interpreted* thus far. He only wasn’t “optimistic” that “major redistributive change” could be done through the courts, which is why he believed the civil rights movement should have sought to do it through legislation rather than being overly dependent on the courts. Obama’s campaign and the media banded together to distort what he said in those tapes, but the evidence is right there in them.
Posted by: Erika | November 11, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
ericka
‘don’t add to it by insulting the intelligence of conservatives’
you can’t insult what’s not there
Posted by: dewde | November 11, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
This page also shows the speech: “Barack Obama: Call to Service in Colorado Springs, CO”
Posted by: Erika | November 11, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Erika,
Media bias towards Obama. Nah. It’s more like media recognition of McCain lies. That’s the blowback McCain gets for the half-truths and lies from his negative campaign.
Posted by: Clem | November 11, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
The first four paragraphs of the 2002 Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq are as follows:
“Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq’s war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;
“Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;
“Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;
“Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;”
_________
I urge you to read the entire resolution.
Now then, failing to comply with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire was grounds to rescind the cease fire. And THAT did not require a new UN Resolution.
Now as for UN Resolution 1511, it reaffirms several previous UN Resolutions, including UN Resolution 1373 (2001) of 28 September 2001. UN Resolution 1373 also reaffirms previous resolutions. You need to read ALL of these resolutions.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Jake – Why do you post this BS as if it were something we all need to be worried about. Why dignify it with a posting. What’s next, Obama is an alien who plans to take over the planet earth.
Rep Broun clearly forgot to take his meds.
Have a little respect for cyring out loud. Stop the insanity
Posted by: Fizziwig | November 11, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
Have to admit, I both fear and loathe Obama and all he represents.
His campaign was nothing but nebulous bromides. Endless babble about “change” but no details.
He was elected as a stealth Leftist. The fawning media tool a pass on examing Obama’s past.
The only derangement was the Cult of Personality groupies who willed this stuffed shirt into office.
Posted by: Texasdav | November 11, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
James:
That is an American government resolution, not a United Nations resolution or mandate.
I’m sure you know the difference. The United Nations did not authorize ANY attack on Iraq.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
Dear Jake,
Obama did actually belong to a social Democratic party called “The New Party”. You might not know this, because the bulk of the press didn’t report it. But having gone to a library and having looked it up myself, I can vouch for it being true. So when that same man is elected, and starts talking about requiring 50 hours of manadatory volunteerism for high school students… I start getting edgy. I start wondering when Obama’s past will actually become relevant to reporters. If that means I have ODS… so be it. I’m going to continue to have it for 4 years… or when the press actually stops having OPS (Obama Praise Syndrome).
Posted by: John Abbott | November 11, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
iamcanadian,
What you said in 2nd paragraph is right on.
Without the majority capable of critical thinking, with scientic knowledge and reasoning muddled by organized religion, America democracy is a critical point. Drama from this election season is a proof of it.
Ask 1) how many conservatives think Palin is qualified to be president, not vice president, not your Idol, not your best friend, not a pop icon, not your community leader, nor your mayor, but the president of USA.
2) If you don’t, did you voted for McCain anyway?
3) Did you take your civic responsibility and do your own fact checks from RELIABLE sources regarding campaign issues?
I am sure there are many civically irresponsible Democrats as well.
Not until everyone start to take up their civil responsibility, not until the majority learn to think critically, not until then, would future Presidential campaigns stop lying for vote.
I hope all Americans would see the urgent need for THAT change. That’s not a change McCain or Obama can give. We have to do it.
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am
We’re eating the bitter fruit of the poisonous seeds cast by the McCain-Palin campaign. Those two campaigned on scurrilous, self-promoting lies. Now the credulous, fearful and paranoid will work this stuff into a churning ferment. McCain’s gracious (I didn’t mean it) concession speech and Palin’s nice words (Never mind!) don’t take it back. Their hunger to win came at the cost of credibility and their true loyalty to and care for the nation. Now the wingnuts they pandered to have been worked up and we will potentially have to hear from them at our cost and pain.
Posted by: canoer | November 11, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am
All tryants have created youth movements and civilian security forces. Haven’t you read any history? If you had, many of Obama’s statements would be worrisome to you. Unfortunately, today’s degree holders have been indoctrinated with leftist claptrap rather than educated and are too damn dumb to know when they are in danger.
Posted by: Jenny | November 11, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am
I experienced the BlackPanthers, crossed their picket lines, and lilved through the SLA and PattyHearst — anyone else remember militant black activists who called themselves a private security force? is that what Obama has in mind? my white, blonde wife was in high school in Oakland and she was locked in her classroome to be ‘safe’ when the BlackPantherCubs marched around school in honor of BobbySeale … opposing the idea an armed black militia operated under color of federal law is not just paranoia — it is a very real threat, America — little do the voters know of Obama’s true desires and objectives for retirbution and revenge against whites.
Posted by: silverblack23 | November 11, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am
The UN Security Council DID authorize the use of force in the 1991 Gulf War. And when Saddam Hussein failed to comply with the 1991 cease fire and the cease fire was rescinded, the war resumed under the original 1991 UN mandate.
YES I do know the difference between a U. S. Congressional resolution and a UN resolution. I brought up the former to show that we invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussein failed to comply with the conditions of the afore mentioned cease fire.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Yes, James you understand there was no United Nations resolution authorizing the ATTACK on Iraq.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am
United Nations weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD, giving support to earlier criticism of poor intelligence on Iraqi WMDs.[40] After the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its WMD programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am
James Danley ,
Have you made up your mind which UN resolution you want to quote to support the Iraq war yet? Make up your mind and don’t switch again. Hold still there, I will shoot it down again.
Whether 2002 Joint Resolution was violated or not, it was not solely up to U.S. to interpret. Period.
Don’t you think Bush government had a reason to trumpet the “Weapons of Mass Destruction” theme before the war? Because they didn’t have a case to invade Iraq based on UN resolutions!
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
All you who say that the possibilty of a dictatorship in America is hogwash are horrifyingly discarding the lessons of history (at your own peril I might add). Remember the burning of the Reichstag?
Adolf Eichmann?
Consider the Milgram experiment: “Only one participant steadfastly refused to administer shocks before the 300-volt level.”
“one experiment was held in a respectable university, the other in an unregistered, backstreet office in a bustling city; the greater the locale’s respectability, the greater the obedience rate”
Be careful where you put your trust. Remember the government is there to serve us, not the other way around.
Posted by: complacency | November 11, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
I am a Muslim, originally from Europe (surprise there are white Muslims too) proud American and I love Obama because he is going to bring us together and help the economy. Please people stop being islamophobic and concentrate on our country, our dream which is unique and probably the only hope that people can believe in. America is the best this world can give, act like it. Lets not make the myth out of that dream the way Bush did. We need to work together now that we have a president who will listen to what we have to say.
Posted by: Sajo | November 11, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
The UN did not need to reauthorize the use of force in 2002. It had already authorized the use of force in 1991.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
James, the United Nations did not in any APPROVE of the ATTACK on Iraq. It was a United States resolution. Get real.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
The U.S. has long maintained its involvement there is with the support of the Iraqi people, but in 2005 when asked directly, 82–87% of the Iraqi populace was opposed to U.S. occupation and wanted U.S. troops to leave. 47% of Iraqis supported attacking U.S. troops.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am
Clem, I have already pointed out several times that the United States DID IN FACT have a case to invade Iraq in 2003 based on the failure of Saddam Hussein to comply with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire–a UN Resolution. As a party to the original 1991 Gulf War AND the 1991 cease fire, the United States had the legal right to terminate that cease fire and resume the original 1991 Gulf War.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am
complacency,
There is always a possibility of dictatorship. Everything is possible.
But after McCain’s divisive campaign, the chance of this article being result of that, or aimed to feed the divisive crowd, that chance by far outweight the chance of Obama’s previous comment signaling a Gestapo government.
Playing clip text, you can create a novel out of it.
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am
A March 7, 2007 survey of more than 2,000 Iraqis found that 78% of the population opposed the presence of Coalition forces in Iraq, that 69% believed the presence of U.S. forces is making things worse, and that 51% of the population considered attacks on coalition forces acceptable, up from 17% in 2004 and 35% in 2006.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am
United Nations weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD, giving support to earlier criticism of poor intelligence on Iraqi WMDs. After the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its WMD programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
The attack on Iraq was an act of great arrogance on the part of the United States done WITHOUT the support of the United NATIONS – and in the end WITHOUT the support of the majority of Iraqis and WITHOUT justification.
United Nations weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD, giving support to earlier criticism of poor intelligence on Iraqi WMDs. After the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its WMD programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
James, what action by Iraq warranted the termination of cease fire? Violated the no-flight zone? Production of weapons of mass destruction? Re-Invasion of Kuwait?
I bet you’d pick weapons of mass destruction. And that was the whole discussion was about. THERE WAS NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am
clem
outside factors aside, you must be concerned about the safety of our constitution.
I’m not saying that it is Obama’s plan to establish a dictatorship but there are disturbing signals coming from him and his campaign. Not the least of which are Mr. Biden’s comments guaranteeing a crisis and saying the administration’s response will appear to be the wrong one but we should blindly trust that they know what is best for us. The Obama youth is a reality. Look around college campuses and inner cities. This isn’t McCain vs Obama. This is staying vigilant in a society that doesn’t know what Habeus Corpus is and worse doesn’t care. On a side note Mr. Bush and the congress already eliminated Habeus Corpus Illegally according to the constitution. Don’t be afraid-be vigilant.
Posted by: complacency | November 11, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am
Uh. Obama will have the most powerful military on the planet answering directly to him.
Adding more people to the mix isn’t really going to add to his power. Well unless you believe blowing up the Earth 6.1 times over is significantly different then blowing it up 6 times.
Posted by: johnTX | November 11, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am
complacency ,
With the way you said it, I can accept it.
It’s a battle between those who think and reason, and those who act on impulse, from both D & R.
It’s already hard enough bring people from all spectrum to work together and progressively move the country forward. The last thing we need was bring people from the left wing and the right wing to hate one another. But that’s exactly what McCain’s negative campaign did to this country.
Posted by: clem | November 11, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am
johntx please study the Schutzstaffel, the Praetorian Guard and Napoleon’s Imperial Guard. The point is: Powerful people like to have their own personal armed forces as the regular army is too unfamiliar and cumbersome to use for certain tasks.
Posted by: complacency | November 11, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am
I agree clem and I am very concerned about the future. Anyone notice the russians deployed missiles in eastern Europe and are excercizing their navy down in Venezuela with Hugo Chavez? Personally I think we may see another American civil war and/or revolution.
Posted by: complacency | November 11, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am
John,
No. I didn’t say I was right. I did not argue I was right. I was merely quoting information for “The Observer” to read, since he/she expressed genuine curiosity in knowing the other side of the opinion – how Patriot Act reduced civil liberty.
I am sure you and “The Observer” can be your own guide to the right answer to the question. If not, I am sure your curiosity will lead you to more qualified people to argue the points than I can.
Posted by: Clem | November 11, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am
No WMD’s used or located in Iraq?
I will give you a clue.
10th SF.
220th MP
Bird in Hand. Over.
Posted by: Gary | November 11, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am
I’m not sure what Obama is going to do, but I do know that I will show him the same respect, support and devotion the Democrats have shown GWB the past eight years.
Posted by: WorldclaZZ | November 11, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am
I would like to be an American citizen that is proud that we can elect a president every four years. I am not proud this year. To paraphase Michelle Obama, “This is the first time in my adult life I am NOT proud of my country”. We elected an unqualified,unprepared and very scary person who was elected on only emotion, not on issues. Most Obama voters did not have a clue about his radical, leftist history, his plans for unearned tax rebates to those who don’t pay any taxes, his million of dollars of untraceable and illegal campaign donations, his stand on the acceptance of partial birth abortions and this civilian military group. Any criticism was distorted by the media as mean or racist. He is scary to the 57 million of those who didn’t vote for him and soon will be to the millions that did. The news media was his enabler and someday they will pay the price for that when he decides he doesn’t like or need them anymore. The only thing historic about this election is the decline of American work ethics and adherence to the Constitution, taxation without representation, instillation of the always failing socalist doctrine and the loss of free speech when the Fairness Doctrine goes into effect. Yes, we are scared and all of us should be.
Posted by: mimi | November 11, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
Perhaps Rep. Paul Broun, R-Georgia intends to run for president in 2012, also, so he’s trying to out do Palin in weirdness.
I am sorry if the lawful election of an American president, by a clear majority of the voters, should be a cause for fear in the hearts of anyone, even the pitiful few who have no place to cry about it but here.
Especially sad is the phrase “history shows” when clearly what they mean is “hysteria shows”.
Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | November 11, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
I don’t believe anyone who signs their name Citizen of Chicago should talk about lawful elections. There’s never been one there.
Posted by: mimi | November 11, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am
I just listened to Imus and he was interviewing Michael Beschloss. While they were marveling about how great it is that Obama was elected. Beschloss said he has an IQ that’s off the charts. He continued talking through Imus’ question “what is his IQ”. Imus has to ask him 3 times before he admitted that he didn’t know. He even said he’s probably one of our smartest presidents. As Bill Clinton said, this is the biggest fantasy! Shame on our news media for doing this to us.
Posted by: Kim | November 11, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am
“FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS”
Posted by: gene | November 11, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Barack Jong-Il just established a “permanent” transition committee. It is completely tax-free, takes unlimited donations and all of the donors are totally anonymous. How’s that for open government, all you reform Democrats? Goes right along the lines of his “promise” to take federal matching funds in the campaign, doesn’t it? Let the sun shine!
Posted by: Jim | November 11, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am
All visionary statists frustrated with the slow pace of “change” in a democracy begin their “rule” this way. If this up, as I hope it does, 2010 will rival 1994, and 2012 will parallel 1980.
Such was the genius of the young people who founded our country. They understood history’s hostility to self-rule and idividual liberty, and so created a wide range of safeguards, including the 2d Amendment (which is not, of course, about hunting) to assure the continuity of both.
Mr. President, your Gestapo will create our Maquis, and the outcome of our conflict at teh ballot box will be the same as the outcome of that struggle in the forests of Occupied France.
Posted by: Ted | November 11, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am
There you have it… are you happy that you elected the most liberal, unexperienced, socialist politician in the U.S. to be president ?
All of the Obama lovers out there who make excuses for him regarding his past associations and the comments he has made about his desire for certain agendas.. you are totally delusional and YOU PEOPLE are the deranged ones..
America will get what they deserve. Obama will hand you payback for electing him president. America will never be the same again.
Wait and see.
Posted by: ml | November 11, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am
ml
I think the point of this article is to say
“koo koo” “koo koo”
and then you all think and say that this whack job from Georgia is right…
lol
no wonder we ended up with the last 8 years.
Posted by: dl | November 11, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am
If you all think the last eight years were so bad, why are you still here? Could it be that though this country isn’t perfect, it is still the strongest, most prosperous, and most free nation on earth? It didn’t get that way by being scocialist.
Posted by: Amy | November 11, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Didn’t one of his staffers say he was ready to “rule” on day one? RULE????
Posted by: samhiguchi | November 11, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Could the possibility of a citizen security force be real? Actually, it could. It’s happening in Iowa. The Iowa smoking ban hinges on citizen complaints via phone, letter, or a web complaint form. Once the State receives a complaint, an “investigation” is initiated thereby allowing the State to penalize the individual for non-compliance. The smoking ban LITERALLY relies on citizens reporting on other citizens in order for it to work. Smokers in Iowa call them the “Smoke Nazi’s” working for the “Smoke Gestapo.” A “citizen security force” could happen as long as people are willing to participate.
Posted by: lucy0909 | November 11, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Still at this “fear is a factor” sydrome?
Posted by: Yankee | November 11, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Well if Broun is as nutty as some of you contend, you libs have a long and miserable four years ahead of you because there are at least 57 million more of us who feel the same way as Congressman Broun. Obama’s resume reads like a Marxist manifesto. Apparently the Obama Kool Aid has gotten to alot of mushy brains as it was intended to do. You poor complacently pathetic libs can go sit this out for the next four years while we gun toters once again pull your fat out of the fire. The South is gonna rise again.
Posted by: Adam | November 11, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Obama’s comment was bizarre. His friendships with Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers, Khalid1 and Rezko all appear to be very real. This guy has the weirdest background of any president and he is unknown to most of us other than change, hope , tax cut for 95%. He could do anything, but his party certainly has some awful strange ideas. Hope for the best, I just do not know what he will do.
The opposite of the syndrome mentioned is the bizarre attachment so many reporters have for this guy. They have lost all objectivity and have all their dreams and hopes tied up in this blank slate. They should try to be journalists and report facts not their hopes.
Posted by: Ron | November 11, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
Anything is better than that moron-King Bush… Anything. Socialism, Marxism- who cares. I don’t.
Posted by: shadowduskeve | November 11, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
People whom are intellectually curious with a resultant ability to discern between emotional bias and rational analysis in the just concluded election, are well aware of the ideological bent of Mr. BO, Boxer, Leahy, Sanders, Durban, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy, ad nausuem (sp). The MSM was a Fifth Column participant in that endeavor.
Americans whom actually believe in the Constitution are wrestling with their options. Other countries facing Leftist Regimes have most often taken countermeasures to balance the propagandistic tendencies of the wayward members of the media.
Posted by: falconflight | November 11, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Representative Paul Broun is being perceptive. It was just yesterday that one of Obama’s spokesperson (Valerie Jarrett) said ‘Obama Ready to RULE on Day 1′. It may be an unfortunate choice of words, but Messiah and his team have consistently said one thing…then done another throughout his campaign. Trust is not a word I would use for his upcoming dictatorship.
Posted by: LoveMyGOP | November 11, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
I think now is a good time to reflect on this bit of wisdom from a founding father (while it’s still legal to reference them)
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. – Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: JohnGaltSpeaking | November 11, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Adam, you and a few others on this board are going overboard. There aren’t anything close to 50 million people who think like you nor 50 million people who are liberals. Thank goodness, most of us are middle of the road with no axe to grind who don’t buy into bigfoot stories and Obama is a Muslim nonsense. We require a little more substance in drawing conclusions. Our country is more important than “the South will rise again” nonsense. So much for “country first”. Both McCain and Obama are good, honorable men and we don’t need to be falsely painting them as extremists on the slimmest threads interpreting quotes the way we want to or seeing conspiracies that aren’t there. Both liberals and conservatives contribute to this great nation of ours and it’s ridiculous to say otherwise in bitterness or hatred. When anyone makes a charge of “elitists” they should think what this nation would be without these great scientists, mathmeticians and great thinkers from the great universities.
Posted by: richard | November 11, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Obama also proposed manditory youth volunteer program, which strikes me the same way.
Posted by: tina | November 11, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Yes, the next four years will be fun, abeit in a morbid sort of way. Those who are not writhing in a orgasmic fit of BOmaina will be adding to the long list of observations about the man:
Craven: BO and his love for Ayers, Wright, and Marshall
Corrupt: BO and his love for Rezco and foreign donations
Stupid: 1st press conference reference to 90 year old widow Nancy Reagan and sealed college records
Yes, there will be many many opportunities to observe this weak, effete, Madison avenue creation. But corrupt, craven, and stupid will quickly become his “me and my shadow.”
Can’t wait! Not a monent of peace for
the dolt from Hype, uh Hyde Park.
The loyal opposition…
Posted by: falconflight | November 11, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
You know – Mr Broun may have a point here.
It would do us all well to be vigilant and alert with this man in office. With any new leader we need to be watchful but with the little we know of him and his controversies – well, we need to be smart here.
If he does create this force it will just serve to set us up for what could be a civil war that we don’t need/want based on race – sad but true.
To take gun ownership away is a direct violation of the foundations of our country.
To spread the wealth around is socialist.
We all need to be wise here – Obama wants to “REMAKE” America- Did you hear that in his speech? Well, he said it but no one caught it. WHY DO WE NEED TO REMAKE AMERICA??? Sure we need to fine tune some things but remake her? Who does Obama think he is? God???
Just be smart people, you don’t know this man. None of us do. We should all question him, and thoroughly, on everything – don’t buy it hook line and sinker or you will be caught up in a net and loose more freedoms in 4 years than you ever thought possible in your lifetime.
As for the potential for Civil War – well, with the Nat’l Security force in place – any attempt made on Obama’s life will be perceived harshly and set of catastrophic events. Heaven forbid the assassin succeed.
Just be smart people – don’t be complacent. Weed out conspiracy theories with care and watch that silver tongued snake. He is out to take America down I think and like lambs on the way to the slaughter Americans voted him in…. Time will tell but be wise, watchful and smart.
Posted by: Jen | November 11, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Republicans are freaking me out! They alternately believe Obama’s a terrorist, socialist, marxist, antichrist. Is this kind of paranoia a mental illness? Or is it just what’s bred in conservative minds when anything that doesn’t fit neatly into their world view comes into play — like a black man being president???? Listen — you are all about to see what it’s like to have an intelligent person lead the country back to prosperity. It’s going to be extremely difficult, because Bush and his friends dug us a huge hole. But, the paranoid out there need to get some treatment and stop thinking that we are now going to become Nazis. What else are you going to try to throw at this man??? Obviously it’s that he’s a space alien, right? I’m very worried about this segment of the population.
Posted by: Debbie | November 11, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Lots of folks talking about Marxism and Socialism, and apparently have no idea at all what they are, or how they work.
Pardon my just barging through here, but upon reflecting on the charges leveled by Mccain and conservatives against Obama that he is a socialist or marxist, I found it interesting, that a basic persusal of the facts regarding these two philosphies, shows a wholly different aspect. One that to me, says the real danger of Marxism comes not from liberals, or Obama, but from the conservatives camp itself.
Marx’s theory seeks the elimination of the notion of private property in order to gain control of the economic “means of production” by taking it from the bourgeois (the wealthy or propertied class) for the benefit of the proletariat (working class.)”
That’s the seriously condensed Readers Digest version. Ah, but HOW does it suggest this happen? Why does it suggest the proletariat arrives at the point of forcibly removing the bourgeois? Thats the part conservatives either blatantly avoid or simply don’t understand despite claiming Obama is a socialist. And with good reason. It completely negates the specious attacks on liberals, Obama in particular, as having Marxist agendas.
Marxism in addition to the above, says that the bourgeois (owners) will tend to invest only in themselves, in increasing their profit, while the proletariat (laborers)will experience decline. This is understood in Marxism to be the direct result of the proletariat holding value in labors, while the bourgeois holds it’s value in ownership and profit. The bourgeois will seek to reduce the need for labor, thus becomeing more profitable, while the proletariat thus becomes weaker as labor will hold less value.
This is where in the disparity in classes really begins to widen. Marx holds that at a certain point, the divide will become so wide, the disparity in class so great, that the proletariat will have no other option than to forcibly overthrow the bourgeois and sieze control of all assets, with the neccessary end result being the equal distribution of property in order to remove class.
Marxism as a rule relies on class disparity in order to manifest itself. It’s the basic premise, that class disparity is what will lead to the forcible realigment of society into a socialist collective.
Nowhere in Marxism is there a premise that allows for natural or gradual transitioning as a matter of public and governmental cooporation towards a socialist state. Which is EXACTLY what conservatives parroting the sociialist rehetoric are saying will happen with Obama or liberals in dominance of the government. It relies on discontentment of the proletariat, and economic secularity in the bourgeois to produce a forced takeover by the proletariat.
What this means for their arguments , is manyfold. And it’s not good.
It means, that democrats in seeking to make taxes more progressive, are in effect reducing class disparity. By doing this, they are in fact, moving AWAY from the tenets of Marxism. They are protecting capitalism as a beneficial corrollary effect of insisting on more progressive taxation, by acknowledging that disparity in the classes, leads to lowered productivity and value in the workforce which in turn leads to a breakdown in economic prosperity as a whole.
It means, that they aknowledge that a captialist state is strongest when it invests in ITSELF on all levels.
Only by acknowledging the true worth of the working class, by acknowledging that they are the true source of economic prosperity and contentment, and maintaining their value accordingly, can you maintain a strong capitalist society. And that is what Liberals do.
Granted, extremes on both sides, both Conservative and Republican exist, of this there is no doubt. But that there has arisen to dominance in the worlds most successful captialist country (America) these particular two parties at odds with eachother, is a natural expected event with capitalism. Too extreme of either isn’t good for the whole. Just like our divided government provides checks and balances against concentration of power, so too do the two parties work to ensure neither leads to an imbalance of economic power.
The biggest problem today, is too few want to admit, that both sides are at their best, when they practice their philosophies in moderation, and work together to reach the common good. So after a time of extreme partisanship like we see now, it’s been less effective, and disparity grows.
It’s become an us or them mentality for conservatives moreso than Libs IMO, which in reality is exactly the sort of mindset that Marxism and Communism MUST have as prequsuite to manifest.
Neoconservatives have no problem with widening the economic disparity in society, which according to Marxism, is a mandatory and reactionary ingredient for socialism and communism to eventually become dominant. In fact, they think it’s a natural part of capitalism, which it is not. Capitalism works, because in our nation, as the founders wrote into our constitution, we have recognized, that no one group can dictate for the whole, nor is any one group more important than the other. Both weak and strong, working together are essential to the success of capitalism. So in effect, the conservative philosophy of leaving the not so well off because their labor holds less value, to fend for themselves, while insisting the well to do who hold wealth through property and investment which hold a much higher value, get to hold even more, is promoting class disparity. The mandatory reactionary ingredient needed for Marxism to take hold and lead us to socialism.
But the conservatives repeating the “Obama is a Marxist” rehtoric don’t want to address this at all. Kinda flies in the face of accusing Libs and Obama in particular, as commies.
Where am I getting this you may ask? In part from the basic theories of taxation under which our captialist country operates. The ideas upon which it was founded. Remember your history? “Taxation without representation”. That is the biggest premise we are taught starting in grade school regarding the war for independence isnt it? There was no accountability. We had no say.
Accountability is part of the deal between government and it’s citizens for paying taxes. It gives the citizens the right to hold it’s government accountable for it’s actions and inactions. It provides protection of citizens property since it is implicit in it’s neccessity of citizens ownership. Which once again, flies in the face of Marxism. Can’t just seize and distribute the wealth for no reason, without incentive, if property is privately owned. And you can’t pay taxes on property if it isnt yours. Why would anybody?
There are further examples of our republican led government ignoring the basic tenets of our constitutional rights, that can easily be considered yet a few more stones in the path to Marxism.
Anyone remember no bid contracts?
I expect my government to promote fair competition and trade, by fairly awarding contracts to the best applicant based on value. Not simply who’s cheaper, but who can do the best job for the best price. But we wouldn’t know if that’s the case with a no bid contract, would we? Which means there is no accountability held to the government for the spending of OUR money. THAT, is the road to dictatorship. Just trust the government to spend our tax money in our best interests, or to spend it wisely without any regard for allowing the people who provided that money to see that it was spent wisely or properly? THAT is not accountability. That is siezure and use without representation.
It’s apparent in most of these accusations, that most repeating the Marxist socialist mantra really have no idea what it all really means. The only part they hear, is someone wants to take their money, and give it to someone else. Guess what folks? That’s what you’ve been doing your entire lives, and it’s what makes a country like ours possible. We are a nation built upon the efforts of all for the one. We all pay, so that we can all be as one. Safe, secure, and strong, as one nation.
When the public is content that it’s efforts are being rewarded, that it’s government is excercising fairness and responsibility according to laws of the land, there is no incentive for revolt, and no chance for Marxism to take hold.
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
What Mr. Broun’s comments tell us is that he, as a supposed representative of the people, does not understand the difference between Marxism and Fascism. Somebody please give the man a dictionary!
Posted by: Alabama | November 11, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Congressman Broun certainly isn’t the first to suggest that some form of monarchy/tyranny/dictatorship can arise out of democracy. According to the more-than-2000-old Greek theory of “anacyclosis” (originated with Polybius, echoed by Machiavelli) some form of monarchy is the natural conclusion of democracy. According to the theory, the descendants of the founders of democracy become complacent and lazy, they no longer value freedom and equality but “aim at preeminence”, and the competing claims of demagogues eventually culminate in the rule of a single demagogue. The historical record bears this theory out to a certain extent, and these same ideas are echoed in the writings of Plato, Cicero, and Aristotle, to name a few. So, based on what he wrote I would say that Congressman Broun is no more crazy or off-base than Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Polybius, and Machiavelli.
Posted by: tim | November 11, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Well, if it wasn’t obvious why the Republicans are the minority party before, it should be now. What a joke of a person. I’m embarrassed for my country to know that he represents some of my fellow Americans.
Posted by: Michael | November 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
First of all, let’s make it clear, I am not afraid of Sen. Obama. I would like to hear from an Obama supporter, to help me understand what the Senator meant by “civilian security force” that has equal funding to the Department of Defense. Would one of you please help me understand this idea?
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
He is off base, because our nations law as written into the constitution, will not allow a president to arbitrarily declare martial law, will not allow him to arbitrarily wield ANY military force against it’s citizens, and restricts the powers of the president by dividing the authorities of the government into three branches. It’s absolutely asinine to try drawing paralells with Germany, or Russia, or any other historical rises of dictatorships, because no nation has ever had the form of government we have, structured as we have. This is ridiculous.
Obama to Congress…
“Er, yeah, I’d like to form a private military force answerable only to me, so I can er, uh, fix problems, yeah”.
Geeeze. Conervatives would do well to spend a little more time on introspection, and less on division and polarization.
Anyone even look into Brouns background? Religious ideology anyone?
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
To all Republicans out there – NEWS FLASH! – Senator McCain LOST the election – period. It is OVER. GET OVER IT.
The Republican party has been VOTED OUT of office. Wake up people – you may not agree with it or like it, but AMERICA has spoken (loudly) and it chose a new leader.
Remember the WARS? The war profiteering by Cheney’s pals? The huge success of a hands-off non-regulated Wall Street and its result on the economy? Global Warming? Dependency on foreign oil? Even if you do not remember them, voters did.
The election is over, there is a new commander in chief and this is a land of INSTITUTIONS, not PEOPLE.
Posted by: Amused | November 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Now that the national swooning is winding down, keep a close eye on Uh-Uh-Uhboma and his Marxist cronies once he gets into the Redhouse. He will use executive orders to circumvent the Constitution, justifying their use by the claim of a national crisis or emergency.
Posted by: eronel | November 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
We need to STOP IDOLIZING OBAMA, A FALSE god. Seriously, the American PUBLIC and the media and the Democrats and Republicans can NO longer give him a “free pass.” This is too dengerous.
Posted by: drno | November 11, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
“He will use executive orders to circumvent the Constitution, justifying their use by the claim of a national crisis or emergency…”
Isn’t it funny / ironic that Bush already did the exact same thing – remember torture? Guantanamo? Illegal phone taps?
Posted by: amused | November 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
obama doesn’t need any special security
force thanks to gbush..who’s executive
order in the time of national calamity
gives the president power over all the
military and ALL government right down
to the government of the small town you
may live in and which power would also
control elections…and once he has taken such power he and only he decides when to relinquish
Posted by: joseph h browning | November 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Some people will never understand, until it’s too late…..buy your guns and ammo now. You just might need it when we have to take our country back.
Posted by: George | November 11, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
I don’t think I’ve seen so much conspiracy parnoia in my entire life.
Does anyone even bother to read or listen to the entire context of this little soundbite that’ whipping them into yet another froth? He’s talking pretty obviously about the same damn things he promoted his entire campaign. Civilian involvement in the repair and improvement of their nation. Not some sooperseekrit military force out to take your guns, and make you worship at the later of Satan.
“Just as we must value and encourage military service across our society, we must honor and expand other opportunities to serve. Because the future of our nation depends on the soldier at Fort Carson, but it also depends on the teacher in East LA, or the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans, the Peace Corps volunteer in Africa, the Foreign Service officer in Indonesia. . . .
Today, AmeriCorps – our nation’s network of local, state and national service programs – has 75,000 slots. And I know firsthand the quality of these programs. My wife Michelle once left her job at a law firm at city hall to be a founding director of an AmeriCorps program in Chicago that trains young people for careers in public service. These programs invest Americans in their communities and their country. They tap America’s greatest resource – our citizens.
That’s why as President, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots, and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world, so that citizens see their efforts connected to a common purpose. People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve. Because when it comes to the challenges we face, the American people are not the problem – they are the answer.
So we are going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We’ll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.
We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Obama
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
There is much in Obamas past (that was ignored by the press) that suggests he is strongly influenced by Marxism. We can only keep our fingers crossed that he is a pragmatist with an “interest” in Marxism and Creation Theology (which is based on Marxism)rather than a closet revolutionary with an agenda. If the press had done its job we would know which is the truth. Their bias failed us by not pursuing the truth during the election. Now we can only support this President…. And hope we have not just handed over the USA to the extremists of the far left. Pray!
Posted by: Trep | November 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Being forewarned is being forearmed. So far I have seen no evidence that Obama even understands the duties of a US President. My principal concern is that Obama suffers from Microcephaly. In photos, his head appears tiny compared to George Bush. Add to that his oddball extemporaneous comments, and I’m thinking this guy has undiagnosed mental deficiencies that go beyond being a generic blockhead. There’s nothing wrong with being dull witted, but when a persons brain is malformed due to genetic problems, the results are either tragic or hilarious.
Posted by: joe bloggs | November 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
The Cold War ended 17 year ago guys. Even Gorbachev must think you are all insane at this point.
Posted by: Jeema | November 11, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Reply to Mr “Amused” comments. Such as his ” ..Remember the WARS? The war profiteering, global warming”
Geez, speaking of ridiculous paranoia! Amazing.
Posted by: Buccaneer | November 11, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
According to Defense news, 7/7/08, Obama defined “civilian security force” as civilians who are helping out the military overseas. The publication quoted Obama as saying:
“I believe we can reconfigure our civilian national-security force. We still have a national security apparatus on the civilian side, in the way the State Department is structured and USAID, that harkens back to the Cold War,” Obama said.
“We need to be able to deploy teams that combine agricultural specialists and engineers and linguists and cultural specialists who are prepared to go into some of the most dangerous areas alongside our military,” he said.
Posted by: Danny | November 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Mimi, while I totally agree with your sentiment I do believe you are wrong on one point. You wrote: “Most Obama voters did not have a clue about his radical, leftist history…” Obviously some fit this description, but I believe the overwhelming majority of the Obama voters KNEW and didn’t care; OR they are radical and leftist themselves.
Now I want to take the time to thank all of those brave men and women who have served our great country throughout our history. So many sacrificed their lives or limbs so that we can enjoy the Freedom of Speech that we exercise here on this blog every day. “THANK YOU!”
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
The fundamental question lurking behind this discussion is this:
Do you believe that our American “democracy” (or “republic” if you prefer) –our “system”– will exist forever?
If not, what do you think it will it become?
Posted by: tim | November 11, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Paul68, thank you for your post. Looks like the CCC from the 1930′s. Perhaps you will agree with me that Obama, who is usualy very good with words, had a bad choice of words at the end of this speech.:
“That’s why as President, I will expand AmeriCorps to 250,000 slots, and make that increased service a vehicle to meet national goals like providing health care and education, saving our planet and restoring our standing in the world… We’ll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families. And we’re going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy.
We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Obama”
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
so………….. let me get this straight
bush derangement syndrome – good
obama derangement syndrome – bad
perhaps we have a case of “what goes around, comes around”.
deal with it you silly libs!!!!
Posted by: Carolyn | November 11, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
And to think Broun is a medical doctor! This is an ‘educated’ person speaking like a paranoid moron. I have no problem debating the merits of Left or Right issues, but Jesus this laughable.
Posted by: Miguel | November 11, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Wow, what a whack job! How can “normal” people believe such idiotic nonsense?
Posted by: Dave | November 11, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
If Obama tell his supporters to jump off a cliff they will do it.
They are that far gone.
One word–Jonestown.
Posted by: sam | November 11, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
When you get done ripping Broun someone remind me where Broun got that idea in his head.
Posted by: heshtesh | November 11, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Dave,
Lot’s of “normal” people heard Obama’s words and were not 100% sure what he meant.
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Obama”
It’s time for the “left” to start showing a little “class” in their victory. I take Obama at his word, he is my President as well as yours. One sure way to undercut his Presidency is to continue to attack each other.
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Barack Obama is a Communitarian, although you will not have heard him use the term during his election campaign. Americans will get a shock when the truth of his hidden agenda becomes known and they find out his real intentions. Bear in mind that Obama is simply a front-man for the New World Order Communitarians.
Communitarians want to create a post-modern, post-democratic feudal society run by a small number of rich and powerful people with everyone else working as peasants. In order to achieve their objectives they must destroy the middle class and the nation state.
Posted by: Stop Common Purpose | November 11, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Barrack is a NEOCOM
Posted by: Carolyn | November 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
I think it is a legitimate concern. The parallels are a little frightening to anyone who was awake in high school history back when they actually taught it. If we think that somehow desparate and dispairing Americans are somehow smarter than desparate and dispairing Germans we are only kidding themselves. Average people did not want what happened there, but they got it anyway in large part because of a large civilian security structure.
Posted by: mark | November 11, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
I realize Rep. Broun isn’t doing himself any favors by saying these things, but Obama’s lack of clarity about what he meant has fueled the fire.
If he meant foreign service, say it. But the way it came across, it sounded as if he was referring to a national civilian security force, not international.
When I heard the speech, I too was baffled by what he meant and I listened and read the whole thing a couple of times.
The ODS rests with Obama in this case for his lack of candor. It also belongs to those who think he can cure the sick, make the blind see, the deaf hear and the lame leap for joy.
Posted by: Tom | November 11, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Tom said: “The ODS rests with Obama in this case for his lack of candor. It also belongs to those who think he can cure the sick, make the blind see, the deaf hear and the lame leap for joy.”
I agree, a better choice of words and we would have never heard of this. Expectations are very high for this President. I am afraid there are going to be a lot of very unhappy people on the left in one year, because NO President, no matter who they are, can deliver everything they promise during the election.
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Let’s look at what Obama said
“just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
That means tanks, B2′s and nukes in the hands of this domestic security force. Since when is it a stretch to cite the man’s words exactly?
Posted by: drjohn | November 11, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Paul68, if President-elect Obama WAS talking about AmeriCorp and an Energy Corps then why did he say that this civilian national security force would be “just as powerful, just as strong” as our military? If he was just metaphorically speaking, then he should have said, “metaphorically speaking.” One of the lessons learned from the campaign is that words DO matter. In this particular case, “just as powerful, just as strong” certainly sounds like an armed force. And I am not aware of AmeriCorp currently arming their members.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
As far as I know, Obama has never discouraged those who speak of him as messiah or savior. Any leader who accepts that from his followers is dangerous. If he thinks of himself that way, he believes his will should be absolute law; his followers will believe they have a divine duty to suppress all opposition, and will do anything he asks.
The Cold War may have ended, but Communism and Marxism are far from dead. The American liberals who see themselves as intellectuals praise current leftist dictatorships, and many would be happy to see such a regime established in the US.
Posted by: Rebecca | November 11, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
No one takes this stuff seriously….but that is EXACTLY what can be taken advantage of. Complacency by the General Populace and a willing press. BOTH of which we’ve just seen in the last election. The fact Obama brought it up proves he’s “thinking” about the Civilian force. What would these guys do? I’m sure he’s not thinking of enforcing immigration laws. We already have LAWS and AGENCIES responsible for enforcing those laws, at Federal Level, Local Level, and State Level. He wants an armed Civilian Army that answers to him – the President. Meanwhile using legislation to stop citizen gun ownership. The founders put that in the Constitution just to “prevent” this type of COUP from occurring. All the brainless dull witted morons will wake up when these civilian armies start shutting down bridges and tunnels in every city in every state – and by then there won’t be a darn thing anybody can do about it.
Posted by: Billy Romps | November 11, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Oh, I don’t know about your history there chief, I’m pretty sure extreme right and extreme left is the same thing. But whatever, this is article is awesome. I swear, the Neo-Con drivel that surfaces on the net everyday ranks up there as some of the funniest written satire ever! LOL – Thanks guys, keep up the good work.
Posted by: Bill S. | November 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
I voted McCain-Palin and I think it’s a valid concern. We need to be very watchful of our government. We all put so much faith into Bush after 9/11 and got a selective use of the Constitution (and misuse or ignoring) and the Iraq War. I believe the surge was the proper coarse of action to clean up the mess made by the neocons, but believe going in was wrong. I hope Obama reverses some of the wrongful and anti-American things Bush has done to America, and he can start by strengthening AmeriCorps or the PeaceCorps, but not creating this “force”.
Posted by: Joe C. | November 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
As a resident of the 10th district of Georgia, I worked for the campaign of Paul Broun’s opponent, Bobby Saxon, Democrat, who is an amazingly smart and charismatic man. The only thing that stopped him from winning this district is that ignorant hicks out in the boondocks could not stand to vote for an African American for President and by proxy any other Democrat for a national race. I am not surprised that Paul is in the news AGAIN for his stupidity. While Paul is grandstanding on a national stage his largest constituency based here in Athens-Clarke County is the 4th POOREST county for its size in the country, even though it is home to the state’s flagship institution UGA. I will never accuse Paul of being a smart man, but at least remain silent and let people think of you as a fool instead of speaking to remove all doubt that you are indeed a fool!
Posted by: Shana Pennywell | November 11, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Rebecca,
Class struggle is at the heart of practicing Marxists. Be reminded of the propaganda that You are the 95% middle class that “I” will help you and They the 5% Rich are the class enemy that you should hate and fight, to vote for “me”.
Progressive taxation is only a symptom. That rhetoric is the true colors of Marxism.
Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Jake,
Look at what the media and the Obama campaign did to Joe the Plumber just because he got Obama to tell what he really feels. You in the press are cooperated with tearing down Joe. But you did not challenge Mr. Obama about anything
With President Bush everything negative thing from oil prices to avian flu was his fault. There was no basis in fact for the people to blame President Bush. There are those facts with Mr. Obama so it is not derangement.
Posted by: arttow | November 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Mike,
Its one thing to not know exactly what the details might entail. Its quite another to make the leap to “may create a security force akin to the Gestapo to impose a Marxist dictatorship”. This statement is being attributed to a congressman. This must be giving the Secret Service great worries. We can thank Palin for stirring up this hysteria. The vast majority of Americans and the world are grateful that we have elected a person who can return honor and hope to what it means to be an American. Unfortunately, we have people like Paul Broun and Michele Bachmann (Palnonites) as loose cannons to stir up people who should know better.
Posted by: Dave | November 11, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Thank god someone has the guts to stand up to Obama and make him answer a question. Obama said it, and he has never explained what it is. I thought libs didn’t like the military now they need two of them? “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” – Barack Obama July 2, 2008
Obama is a Marxist and if you don’t believe it read this. His Mother and Grandparents were Marxists:
Say what you will, but Obama is a Marxist. Laugh all you want, but I bet the Germans did the same thing when Hitler came on the scene.
Posted by: Right Winger | November 11, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
This is ridiculous. Read the speech! Volunteer teachers and Peace Corps members are NOT a secret Nazi paramilitary force.
The point of the entire speech is simply that a strong infrastructure, strong schools, and a strong healthcare system are important to our national security.
Who are the members of this “civilian security force” that you fear so much? Just read the speech:
“… the teacher in East LA, or the nurse in Appalachia, the after-school worker in New Orleans, the Peace Corps volunteer in Africa, the Foreign Service officer in Indonesia.”
Do you really, honestly think that a militia of Appalachian nurses is going to break down your door and take your guns?
Do you think that when Obama promises to “double the size of Peace Corps by 2011,” that he will turn them into an armed gestapo? For crying out loud, most of those Peace Corps hippies can’t even fire a gun!
The people in the “civilian security force” are people who contribute to the infrastructure and help improve national security by volunteering, and NOT by using weapons.
Get a grip.
Posted by: Jamie | November 11, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Why are we singling out this Broun nobody here? I’ve been hearing the “socialist marxist” crap for weeks now. Sarah Palin started it. Not to mention it’s been in the rhetorical question tumbler on FOX for just as long.
Glad to see the GOP co-opting the conspiracy theory movement, in their basements with their ham radios, trading schizophrenic revelations on darkly-lit blogs.
Posted by: Cory | November 11, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Dave,
Just saying our new President needs to be careful with his words. A year from now his problem will not be what the “Right” is saying about him, it will be what the “Left” is saying.
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
He’s a Marxist. The link to this article was deleted:
From American Thinker “Red Diaper baby”
“No. Barack Obama is a “red diaper baby” who has spent his formative years — literally from the moment of his birth — interacting with members and sympathizers of the Communist Party, USA. His mother Stanley Ann Dunham has been described by former classmates as a “fellow traveler.” His grandfather Stanley Armour Dunham arranged Obama’s mentorship by Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.
Key details about Ann Dunham come from interviews in The Chicago Tribune, March 27, 2007 and the Seattle Times, April 8, 2008.
Done bouncing around Kansas, California and Texas in the years after World War Two, Stanley and Madelyn in 1955 picked up and relocated 2,000 miles from Texas to Seattle. The next year they relocated to Mercer Island specifically so their daughter, Obama’s future mother, Stanley Ann Dunham could attend Mercer Island high school.
What was special about Mercer Island High School? The Chicago Tribune explains:
“In 1955, the chairman of the Mercer Island school board, John Stenhouse, testified before the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party.”
Posted by: Right Winger | November 11, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
“Paul68, if President-elect Obama WAS talking about AmeriCorp and an Energy Corps then why did he say that this civilian national security force would be “just as powerful, just as strong” as our military? If he was just metaphorically speaking, then he should have said, “metaphorically speaking.” One of the lessons learned from the campaign is that words DO matter.”
Does power only = military weaponry? Guns? Grenades? Tanks?
Or does power also refer to the strength of people? You know, voting, organizing, acting?
Obama was pretty clear. The problem here, is that bad enough, partisan politics was in full swing, but thanks to some of the ugliest tactics in history, Obama wasn’t just attacked, he was villified. He was painted a traitor, unamerican, not like “us”, and all the rest. And the hardcore necon base swallowed it.
Look at some of the comments. Not just here, but anywhere debate over Obama rages. Anyone defending or supporting Obama is eventually, or outright, painted as foolish, blind, stupid, ignorant.
Which is irony of the highest order. The folks making these attacks, are the same folks who bought without question, and offered their rabid support for Bush’s policies, when the results of those policies were impossible to ignore.
Bush said the economy would grow thanks to his policies, but it went steadily downward, with experts everywhere sounding the alarm.
He LIED about Iraq.
He told us Iraq would be a short war.
He told us they’d love us for going in.
And all of this was BS, and proved itself BS in short order.
And what did neocon supporters do?
Attack and villify anyone who spoke up against Bush policy. Attacked and belittled those damn foolish liberals. By god theyr’e just ignorant, foolish, commies!
And now that republicans lost power?
It’s even worse.
Every remark, every tenuous association, every out of context quote, is an opening for attack.
Again, what does power mean?
The problem is, two words here. Two simple words, that thanks to the rabid blindness of those who have swallowed all the far right “Obama is a Commie” rehtoric, now hold only the most sinister of meaning. He’s a commie, what else could they possibly mean?
“Security Force”.
Primed and ready, stinging from a serious defeat, neocons sieze on these two words and ignore the entirety of the speech. With rage and self righteousness, they take to the blogs, and begin decrying the coming of the Obama SS.
Sure, National security has finally been realized as being more than simply having a big military and beating the bad guys that attack us. Sure it’s finally been realized that our reliance on oil, our inability to secure our ports, our failures to educate our children better than less fortunate countries are all part and parcel of our “national security”.
“But see, Obama’s not one of us. He’s a, a, a , MARXIST!!! He wants to turn us into a Socialist Republic!! Sure we have no proof, but but but, he’s really really liberal, and we all know what that means!! See!!? It’s obvious, and all you liberals are just fools for not believing it too!!”
Tinfoil hat madness if ever there was any.
This “security force”, judging from Obama’s own words, would consist of, me, and you. Everyone.
It would be all of us who so choose, organized, trained, and working together, to fix our schools, our economy, our energy independance, our open ports, our swiss cheese borders.
Properly done, yes. We’d be every bit as powerful as our military.
The problem is not Obama’s choice of words. His biggest fault, is in not realizing just how desperate, how spiteful, how viscious the right was going to become in their defeat.
The fault lies with those, who despite knowing better, despite understanding just how ridiculous the idea of an American president creating a military force of his own is, insist on continuing with the villification.
Obama has not even taken office, and still he is attacked as a Marxist, Commie. Utter lunacy.
The Dems won. Again, introspection would go a whole hell of a lot further towards assuaging republican hurts, than all this ridiculous denial.
Obama doesnt need to be more careful in his words. Folks need to be more rational in their thinking.
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Republican Congressman from Georgia, Paul Broun, recently commented that President-elect Obama would establish a Gestapo-like security force to impose a Marxist Dictatorship.
Lets get a few facts established! When will Republicans learn that fear tactics do not work with freethinking Americans, and can only be effective with hardcore Republicans that find it impossible to think beyond what is taught to them by Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and racial Republicans such as Paul Broun!
Are Republicans aware that President Bush helped establish and promote Blackwater USA when Bush granted Blackwater USA no-bid contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan? Bush also sent 150 Blackwater armed troops to secure New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
The founder of Blackwater is Erik Prince, a conservative Christian who has given an incredible amount of money to Republican candidates and Christian Rights groups. Blackwater is located on over 6000 acres in Moyock, N.C., and has its own Air Force.
It is possible that Americans should be concerned about Evangelical churches that are teaching hatred and Nazi beliefs, and promoting individuals such as Palin who purposely promoted aggressive reactions from crowds that attended her hatred filled rallies -similar tactics used by Hitler. Remember…the cries of KILL HIM… The racial Republican Party has devised its own religion, and it”s far removed from what Christ taught and believed in.
Posted by: DeefromTexas | November 11, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Paul68 said:
“Obama doesnt need to be more careful in his words. Folks need to be more rational in their thinking.”
Paul, I prefer a President who IS careful in his choice of words.
Posted by: Mike | November 11, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Its ok then that Obama is a Marxist because Hilter wasn’t a Marxist. Ok whatever!
Bush didn’t lie I just wrote a book and Saddam was financing, training, and carrying out operations with al Qaida since 1990. WMDs were in Iraq in 2001. My book comes out in 2009. Its based on the original sourced Iraqi documents captured in Iraq by the military. I actually read the Pentagon report and original memos and transcripts unlike the media. The only people that lied are the media and Obama!
Posted by: Right Winger | November 11, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
What kind of person attacks the newly elected president of his own country?That doesn’t sound like an American to me. It sounds like somebody who wants to destroy America instead, to divide and conquer, to spread rot and disease within.
What kind of person talks about looking forward to 4 years of “payback”? Against whom, against the majority of your fellow countrymen who didn’t vote the way you wanted them to? Who are these who spread the lies, trying to divide us?
It takes courage to be a real American. The fear mongers and sissy pants among us are frightened of our president-elect. American voted for Barack Obama because we are ready for a leader who will be a fair and lawful president to all Americans, not just the “right wing” or the “left wing” or any of that out-dated junk.
Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | November 11, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
“Bush didn’t lie I just wrote a book and Saddam was financing, training, and carrying out operations with al Qaida since 1990. WMDs were in Iraq in 2001.”
PT Barnum’s famous quote applies here.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Voting percentages in general elections are now fairly static. Obama didn’t convince anyone who needed convincing. He got the usual Democrat reserve of about 48% of voters who would send Tootles the Clown to the White House if he had a D next to his name on the ballot. Team Obama also got out the “I’m pretending to go to college” vote, the homeless vote, the convicted felon vote, the Magic Kingdom vote, the Gay sexworker vote, and the “I want more Mexican Neighbors” vote. Normally these people stay home, but lots of advertising during TV shows for the brain dead paid off. So now we have Mr Hope n’ Change, a microcephalic without a clue what a US President is supposed to do, abuot to move into the White House with his booby wife. I suppose his Chicago Combine pals can hold his hand during the signing sessions, and keep him from falling off his chair.
Posted by: Joe B. | November 11, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
To: citizen of Chicago..Your question was “What kind of person attacks the newly elected president of his own country?” Well, I seem to remember that George Bush Jr. was fair game to all of you left wing fanatics. So, turn about is fair play, you attacked GB Jr and we will continue to have our say about Obama. FOR THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS THAT HE IS NOT FIT TO RUN THE COUNTRY!!! Why don’t you left wing nuts get a job or something?? Most people voted for Obama because 1)He is black or 2)They think he is going to give them money from real working people!
Posted by: Jane | November 11, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Paul68 wrote: “Or does power also refer to the strength of people? You know, voting, organizing, acting?”
With all due respect, you might want to review the definition of “metaphorically speaking.” As I mentioned previously, President-elect Obama should have included “metaphorically speaking” if had he meant “voting, organizing, acting” as opposed to weaponry.
Finally, so we must give President-elect Obama a pass on the phrase “just as powerful, just as strong” because it is irrational to think he could possibly mean weaponry? That is the same malarkey that the Left wants us to believe about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s continual threats to destroy Israel.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
In the making of lemonade out of lemons category; getting people like Paul Broun and Michele Bachmann into the news really validates a vote for Obama. Nothing more needs to be said than reading comments such as these.
Posted by: Dave | November 11, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Isnt that basically the same as the National Guard. I mean the Taliban has spread all across the world. Thanks In Part to Bush and his my way or no way approach to war. Our troops arent coming home anytime soon. And they are fatigued and tired. Why not build up our national guard to help take care of things on the homefront,while they deal with issues abroad.
We now have a president, that so far people actually like around the world,as he repairs the good faith and our image across the globe, our allies will join in on the fight to stop the Taliban once and for all. Taking some of the stress off our troops.
I’m getting so sick of people questioning his methods or his ideas,when they havent even given them a chance to work or fail. Stop being so darn judgemental and throw our 100% support behind our President Elect. This is America and he is our Leader.
Support him,no matter his skin color. Weve had 20 years of white republicans telling us, this is the way things should be done, We have seen how well those ideas have played out. Lets give a new fresh approach a chance to work.
Our country will never be like Nazi Germany.
Our president elect is not going to make white americans slaves.
Black people are not going to run wild, and start attacking you good white folk.
He is not going to take you’re gun rights away from you.
He is not a terriost, he is not trying to destroy the country his own children have a future stake in.
He is not going to take away you’re rights.
Stop being and acting so damn stupid and backwards. And use you’re common sense people. And give him a chance to try and solve our countries issues.
Hey if he fails, He doesnt get elected again in 4 years.
Posted by: Becky Got a Rifle. | November 11, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
While the man does sound paranoid, those people are not a danger. No, the dangerous are those who think that it can’t happen. I’m sure those who warned of Hitler in Germany recieved pretty much the same condesention, from those who voted for change, as this fella is today.
Posted by: Les Roark | November 11, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
It isn’t the same as the National Guard. The National Guard is generally under the jurisdiction of the individual States. Which brings an interesting question, why doesn’t Obama just expand the Peace Corps, AmeriCorps, and provide more funding of Bush’s Homeland Security and other unfunded mandates to the States?? I really don’t see the need in creating anything new.
Posted by: Joe C. | November 11, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
People,what is it with the new tendency to call rasist everyone who says something against obama’s politics? So from Jan 20 2013 everything he does is perfect and no critics is allowed because he is black? If he was white, no one would call a person rasist just because that person criticizes him. But since he is not white, it’s forbidden to criticize him. Helllo, that’s exactly approaching Hitler’s status- worshiping Obama and make all critics to shut up. Way to go! Proves Broun might be right.
Posted by: Laura | November 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I don’t know if Broun is right or not, but he is doing a very patriotic thing by pointing out something that could be unacceptable in a place like America. More people should have stood up to George W. Bush in his strong-arming and Constitutionally questionable practices over the past eight years – not to mention his refusal to stop wasteful spending. I’m a Republican, but think Bush deserves impeachment more than Clinton, Andrew Johnson, or the non-impeached Nixon did.
Posted by: Joe C. | November 11, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Ryan C, why is it a “lie” when President Bush said Saddam Hussein had WMDs and it is not a “lie” when the Democrats, including former President Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and dozens of Senators and Congressmen said the same thing (and some even used the phrase “imminent threat”) back in 1998? I suppose you will say that the Democrats were telling the truth back then, but that Saddam Hussein had destroyed all of his WMDs by the time that we invaded Iraq in 2003!
The fact is that Saddam Hussein did at one time have chemical and biological weapons. And he did at one time have a nuclear program–as evidenced by the 550 metric tons of yellowcake uranium that was shipped out of Iraq just this past July. We still don’t know what became of the WMDs. Did Saddam Hussein destroy them, bury them (and may one day be found, and possibly fall into the hands of terrorists) OR did he just ship them out of Iraq (in which case they could very likely fall into the hands of terrorists)?
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
I will not support corruptocrat Obama. He was elected after the dirtiest presidential campaign in US history, with Team Obama collecting huge hauls of illegal cash, while promising vague hope and change to uninformed voters, and the dangerously partisan press refusing to examine his history, true beliefs, and possible mental deficiencies. There is no doubt that he is supported by a huge creepy cult — many who are elected officials and media celebrities — who are willing to cheat, lie, steal, and denigrate honorable people for their own personal Jesus, but he ain’t my savior and I will happily criticize and ridicule him (he will give us many hilarious opportunities) until he gets escorted off the premises of the White House after the end of his ignominious term.
Posted by: Joe B. | November 11, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Laura:
I find it often happens that “right wingers” come here and accuse the Democrats of calling them racist – when the Democrats haven’t been focusing on race at all.
The right wingers bring up race and then accuse the Democrats of throwing race in their face.
A curious ploy.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Laura. You obviously don’t really pay attention to some of the things they call President elect Obama. Calling a US Senator a terrorist. Come on,if he was white do you think people would call him that.
My issue is with people who have already made up there mind that he will be a horrible president,when he hasn’t even took office. You cant criticize a person’s performance,when he hasn’t started performing the job.
Let him do his job,if he fails then criticize him all you want, But IMO people judging and attacking him B4 he takes the job, our only looking at his skin color and relying on there thinking that a person of color is not able to the job that a white man can do.
I mean look,he’s already helping the economy,Since he won office Gun Sales across the south have increased darn near 50 percent. because people are so stupid in believing he is going to take there rights from them. Come on now. Use your common sense People. I’m sure that hard earned money could have went to something more useful than guns.
You can walk this earth blindly,believing that people aren’t racist if you like. Unfortunately I don’t have that much faith in Mankind.
Posted by: Proud Obama Supporter | November 11, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
It appears that some conservatives care more about being right (no pun intended) than about our country. They are so eager to twist Mr. Obama’s words around and take them completely out of context to say, “See there! See what a bad choice you people made! We’re all screwed!” If they reacted to the every-day situations of their personal lives with as much selfish paranoia as they do in their political lives, they would be in the crazy house. Why are they so eager to bring down a seemingly bright and decent human being, especially when that person has been chosen by the American people, through democratic process, to be the next leader of our country? Instead of wasting their time with this stupid crap, they should take a good, hard look in the mirror in order to figure out where their party went wrong. This is why things never improve around here—people are more concerned with being right than with solving problems.
Posted by: Katie | November 11, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I am sick and tired of everyone making this a Race topic. I for one do not belive everything I read, But The MOST important subject should be *What is best for the people” Our elderly that worked their entire life that now needs health insurance, Our children who need Medical Services, Help for those Young And Old alike who really need it. Not the Addicts or the Ones who want to draw out the benifits just because they dont want to do a days work, and claim disability, that is what got this country in the mess we are in, yes everyone wants to blame the president, but we, us is who elected them in office, so stop blaming each other and start working on what we could do to make our country a better country. If its true what they are saying about our new president, it will all come out in the wash, till then and only then, can we unite and stand as one, but only when all the BS is stopped and the fingerpointing is over and WE THE PEOPLE STAND AS ONE Voice, leave the race thing out of the opinion,I did not vote for Mr Obama not because of his color, But because i felt we needed someone who was older and more expericenced with politics,But both McCain and Obama bashed each other, Why not stay on the issues that should be concerning this country,
Posted by: darla | November 11, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Well James,our so called friend Pakinstan has nuclear weapons of Mass Destruction. We havent invaded them, and they are far more unstable than Iraq was at the time we attacked them
What if there goverment is taken over by the taliban. They Have nuclear weapons that the Bush Adminstration provided. Does that make much common sense to you.
If we are going to ban one country from having nukes then we need to ban all countries from having nukes.
And as long as we have been fighting this war, If Iraq had weapons, we would have found them by now. I mean we do have some of the best technology in the world, and the greatest military force.
Posted by: Bye Bye Bush. | November 11, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
So James Danley,
Where are all the WMD that Saddam was ready to give to terrorists making it necessary for an immediate invasion?
Why the Niger yellow cake forgery?
Why the retaliation towards Joe Wilson and Valeria Plame?
Why was Scooter Libby pardoned?
“The fact is that Saddam Hussein did at one time have chemical and biological weapons.”
At one time? At one time this country supported slavery. At one time we were mortal enemies with England.
“We still don’t know what became of the WMDs”
6 months of inspections turned up nothing and yet Bush preceded with the invasion anyway.
And because of that thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are dead.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
I can’t even read the ignorant comments spewed here. Thanks, Jake, way to earn your pay! Never mind pointing out that, just as one commenter stated, Obama WAS talking about Peace Corp, AmeriCorp, and even a seniors corp to volunteer their experience in small business and work in general. Just don’t bother citing the original speech Broun is so stupidly “critiquing”.
The Obama win has sent me back to church, to pray the so-called liberal media does more than smugly parrot the idiocy of the worst representatives of the American people. Obama’s plan is still online, utterly transparent, all in partnership with private business – so much for the socialist-conspiracy-nutbags
Posted by: Virginia | November 11, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The Constitution of the United States provides for the smooth transition of power between the various opinions on who shall be in charge of the country. Those who cry gloom and doom over the normal progress of American government are at heart anarchists who want no government at all.
They didn’t get the guy they wanted in office, so now they want to tear it all down. Is that being an American? Or is that helping America’s enemies?
Our next President deserves the consideration and respect of everyone, because he represents the entire country.
If you say the President of the United States does not represent you, you are trying to falsify the voice of the people. You renounce your country, your constitution, and your flag when you spew hatred and discord among us.
As Americans, we tolerate your views, but in my opinion the behavior and comments by the anti-Obama/anti-American faction is a shame and disgrace to the American flag and those brave heroes who have died for its glory.
Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | November 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Nice work Virginia.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Oops, they cut off most of the documentation information in your post Virginia.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
To Proud Obama’s Supporter,
that’s what I meant – why cannot I criticize him if I oppose his program and politics? As soon as I do, I am called racist. Is that normal? You actually prove me right, thanks. All liberals criticized Bush before he even started, why cannot we conservatives do the same to your favorite guy? Is someone more equal because of his skin color?
Posted by: Laura | November 11, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Rumsfeld met with Saddam, and the two discussed regional issues of mutual interest, shared enmity toward Iran and Syria, and the U.S.’s efforts to find alternative routes to transport Iraq’s oil; its facilities in the Persian Gulf had been shut down by Iran, and Iran’s ally, Syria, had cut off a pipeline that transported Iraqi oil through its territory. Rumsfeld made no reference to chemical weapons, according to detailed notes on the meeting.
The current Bush administration discusses Iraq in starkly moralistic terms to further its goal of persuading a skeptical world that a preemptive and premeditated attack on Iraq could and should be supported as a “just war.” The documents included in this briefing book reflect the realpolitik that determined this country’s policies during the years when Iraq was actually employing chemical weapons. Actual rather than rhetorical opposition to such use was evidently not perceived to serve U.S. interests; instead, the Reagan administration did not deviate from its determination that Iraq was to serve as the instrument to prevent an Iranian victory. Chemical warfare was viewed as a potentially embarrassing public relations problem that complicated efforts to provide assistance. The Iraqi government’s repressive internal policies, though well known to the U.S. government at the time, did not figure at all in the presidential directives that established U.S. policy toward the Iran-Iraq war. The U.S. was concerned with its ability to project military force in the Middle East, and to keep the oil flowing.
Posted by: dewde | November 11, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
If this is the kind of silliness that just the election of a black man with a funny name brings out of the woodwork, we have a long eight years ahead of us. The flipping out outta really be interesting once he’s actually in office. ;)
Mike?
I don’t see any need for a man making a speech, to catagorize every phrase just in case someone wont “get it”. The bottom line is, this is a non issue. Just like all the others tossed out there during the campaign. Which is why for the most part, no one paid any of it any real attention, other than to roll their eyes, and move on to the issues that really matter to them and their country, which is why Obama won.
To put is as simply as possible, most people are sick of this garbage. And while those who cannot accept that a black liberal won the WH will continue to bemoan their loss and remain stuck in their party isolation, the rest of the world will move on, to hopefully better and happier days.
As for Broun? You conservatives out there better circle the wagons around this yahoo if you want his career to last another stint.
“Sane people all over the country are snickering at Broun, as they should be. He is the point at which the lunatic fringe and Republican officeholders intersect.”
“Crackpot theories from a sitting U.S. Congressman on Barack Obama”
“The difference between legitimate criticism and demagogic smear is the difference between objecting to Obama’s corporate liberalism and raising hysterical fears regarding Obama’s purported Marxism/socialism, a claim that would be knee-slapping hilarious if it wasn’t so boneheaded ignorant.”
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Citizen of Chicago – Where waas that attitude when Pres. Bush won? All you libs did was insult and attack him!
We will give Obama the same attitude you libs gave President Bush!!
Obama is against the Constitution! that is his words!
He is against free speech!
He is a Marxist, and we must stand guard!
He already plans on using the White house for political campaigns which is illegal!!
Posted by: spock | November 11, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Sorry, last comment was directed at James. Not MIke.
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Bush’s approval rating when elected was at about 50%.
Obama’s approval rating immediately after the elections was 68%.
Bush’s highest ratings were at almost 90% for about 4 months after 9/11 and steadily declined since then.
Currently over 70% of Americans disapprove of Bush and his handling of the reigns of power.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Turnabout = Fair Play.
Some of us will treat Obama EXACTLY like all of you liberals treated President Bush.
And, we will be first in line to say “I told you so”, when you lose more of your liberties than you ever dreamed of President Bush taking away from you.
Posted by: merle | November 11, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Oh, and one more thing.
I will be proudly wearing my new ODS button, LOUD AND PROUD.
And, as libs LOVE to say: I’ll be “speaking truth to power”.
Posted by: merle | November 11, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
merle:
“Currently over 70% of Americans disapprove of Bush and his handling of the reigns of power.”
I guess over 70% of Americans are now ‘liberals’. your world is changing.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I’m tired of the fear mongering. I’ve had 8 years of people trying to control me with fear. I’m done.
I’ll be vigilant and prepared against abuses of power, but I will not be driven into hysteria by the mere possibility of abuse.
Further, the people spouting this nonsense are part of the anti-intellectual tinfoil hat brigade. I doubt any of them have read Marx or knows what a Marxist actually is and certainly don’t understand history well enough to realize that this situation bears little resemblance to Germany.
No more.
Posted by: johnTX | November 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
paul68: I said the same thing that Broun said months ago. You can feel it in the sound of his speeches. Obama is half Kenyan whose father was from Africa and I don’t want to tell you what I read about him. Kenya has a ruler and Obama has that Kenyan blood in him. I beleive like Broun he wants to rule this country and its people like you that voted for him that are the ruination of this country along with the majority of nitwitted college students that are heavy on drugs and booze. They would vote for him if he had a prison record because they are lameless brainless. They don’t have a clue on what is going to happen later. All they think about is they voted him in and that’s the end of it. No, that’s not the end. That’s the beginning and the end will be when he gets thru destroying this country.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
It’s quite possible that at least some of the posts on internet blogs are from hostile groups intent on creating discord and disorder in the United States.
We have a new President, lawfully selected by a vote of the American people. This is a chance for all Americans to renew their patriotic virtues and take part in rebuilding the country.
It takes courage to show your loyalty to America and support your President. If you lack that courage, I have to wonder why you seek to undermine the courage of others. Are you for the United States of America or for some other “homeland”?
Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | November 11, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
“Obama is half Kenyan whose father was from Africa and I don’t want to tell you what I read about him. Kenya has a ruler and Obama has that Kenyan blood in him. I beleive like Broun he wants to rule this country and its people like you that voted for him that are the ruination of this country along with the majority of nitwitted college students that are heavy on drugs and booze.”
ROFLMAO.
Now is the time I like remind right wingers that the inauguration of President Barack Obama is 70 days away.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
You paranoid people make me laugh.
Its so funny to listen to you blather on about how Obama is a marxist etc…good lord…and you were all so quiet when Bush pushed the patriot act on us, which actually did take away our civil liberties.
Posted by: Paul | November 11, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“Some of us will treat Obama EXACTLY like all of you liberals treated President Bush.”
And here we have the summation of the maturity level of the right wing.
“They started it!”
Right wingers act like five year olds, too cowardly to even take responsibility for their bile by somehow blaming others for it.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
I share a lot of people’s respect of our Constitution, but it must be remembered that the Constitution of today is very different than the Constitution of 1787. We may not recognize the Constitution of 2087. Constitutional change is brought about in subtle and imperceptible ways; the SCOTUS’ Commerce Clause jurisprudence is an excellent example of this. The use of Executive Orders provides another. It is undeniable that the powers of the federal government have gradually increased over the past several generations, and the Congressman’s concern reflects a legitimate belief that the central government is growing too big for its britches. It is simply an echo of the old, some would say overly simplistic adage “a government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take it all away”. Well, a lot of people in this country believe that Obama was elected because many people want a government big enough to give them everything they want. I take no position on whether that is truly the case.
At any rate, I wish to again come to the Congressman’s defense by mentioning the ancient theory of anacyclosis–the idea that some form of monarchy is the natural conclusion of democracy. I would not say that Obama represents this transition. I don’t think he does. But I do say that the Congressman’s comments reflect an ancient belief that is on the lips of many people, a belief as old as democracy itself–that democracy cannot be sustained forever.
To fear the end of democracy is no more a lunatic idea than to advocate democracy.
Posted by: tim | November 11, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Actually the conservatives on here can’t claim “you started it” anyway since their treatment of Clinton and decision to impeach him for a minor offense is what started the whole partisan war that’s engulfed this nation for the last 12 years.
Posted by: Paul | November 11, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“Right wingers act like five year olds, too cowardly to even take responsibility for their bile by somehow blaming others for it. ”
Ryan C, then be that awesome dem who stops it. The point still is, that critics against this person who was elected, is called racism. How can you presume that critics is based on race? I’d criticize a white dem,too. You dems and libs tend to proclaim yourself so right about everything, so how come the economy went down when dems took over 2 years ago? Don’t you think Bush just had to deal with the mess Clinton had created in his 8 yrs?
Posted by: Laura | November 11, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Laura:
I find it often happens that “right wingers” come here and accuse the Democrats of calling them racist – when the Democrats largely haven’t been focusing on race at all.
The right wingers bring up race and then accuse the Democrats of throwing race in their face.
A curious ploy.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
If you have not read the entire speech and understand the context of these “pinched” words I can see how you would be afraid. The almighty context seems to be grossly ignored in this country, in politics, beliefs, social interaction, and education. I cite this article and its comments as proof.
Im all for thoughtful discourse and debates with open eyes and hearts, but the ferocity with which people are grasping onto non-issues created by out of context words is astounding. The use of simplified catch phrases in a discussion whose memes are perhaps twisted or misunderstood in the context of the argument is also not helpful. Extremes of all “sides” have resorted to doing this, creating a lot of what at this point sounds like a lot of infuriatingly useless noise.
In order to change, in order for these discourses to be useful, for the goal of keeping a prosperous democracy, we as a population must independently consider the context of our discourse and in doing so come to our own (hopefully strong but flexible) opinions. This is the foundation of a healthy democracy: diversity of thought, spirit, race, ideology, and values. To not do so and to latch onto the ideas of others without thought but with conviction will lead inevitably toward a situation in which you/we are taken advantage of and dictatorship.
Cutting diversity of thought for simplicity (ala over worked people and a money grubbing media) is a pox of which we have demonstrated remarkably low resistance.
Posted by: Sirklick | November 11, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“Ryan C, then be that awesome dem who stops it. The point still is, that critics against this person who was elected, is called racism.”
This is called a straw man argument.
Criticism of Obama is not racist unless the commenter chooses to make that criticism based on race.
They are then called out as racists.
“Don’t you think Bush just had to deal with the mess Clinton had created in his 8 yrs?”
ROFLMAO.
Huge budget surpluses and being the world’s only unquestioned super power, the evil Clinton!
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Ryan C,
you still don’t notice the tendency to describe all his critics racists? Look at the comments below. It shows often enough. What I choose to base my critics on does not matter anymore, because even though I base it on his political views, everyone keeps yelling in my face one word – racist.
“Evil Clinton” – no, he’s not the main reason, it’s global this time. All I am saying – look at dems and libs with constructive criticism, not blindly follow them. Dems do have problems with resolving economy issues.
Why straw men argument? Just set us conservative an example.
Posted by: Laura | November 11, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Sad, really. Everyone is so sure that their vision for the U.S. is the right one. Everyone is so sure that his neighbor is so wrong. It won’t surprise me one whit if we end up embroiled in another Civil War in the near future. From what I can see, through the comments displayed on this blog, it is inevitable.
Posted by: paula | November 11, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
There is nothing deranged about this. He said that he wants to do something that Americans have always avoided because it is immensely dangerous to liberty.
Posted by: hogless | November 11, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
To Ryan C.:
“What kind of person attacks the newly elected president of his own country?That doesn’t sound like an American to me. It sounds like somebody who wants to destroy America instead, to divide and conquer, to spread rot and disease within.”
HOW CONVENIENT TO USE THIS ARGUMENT NOW, AFTER LIBERALS HAVE BEEN ATTACKING THE OUR PRESIDENT FOR THE LAST 8 YEARS!
REMINDS ME OF THE KID THAT PUNCHED A LITTLE BOY ON THE PLAYGROUND, AND THEN CRIED AND TOLD THE TEACHER WHEN HE GOT PUNCHED BACK.
ENJOY THE NEXT FOUR YEARS OF MARXISM. I HOPE YOU DON’T HAVE SONS THAT WILL BE DRAFTED FOR OBAMA’S “CIVILIAN SECURITY”. MMM, DIDN’T HITLER DO THE SAME THING? FORM HIS OWN “CIVILIAN SECURITY”?
Posted by: Obama=Dictator | November 11, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Wow, how can this guy have any credibility. He bases his entire argument on a comparison to Adolph Hitler, beginning with the fact that Hitler was elected in a democratic Germany. In fact, Hitler lost that election.
Posted by: Priapus | November 11, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“you still don’t notice the tendency to describe all his critics racists?”
I don’t see that tendency at all.
Its when right wingers bring Obama’s race into it or make some kind of racist remarks usually stereotyping African Americans that they are called racists.
If you have been called a racist more than once, chances are good you were acting like one.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Ryan C –
“Why the Niger yellow cake forgery?” British Intelligence did not consider that forgery in determining that Saddam Hussein was seeking yellowcake uranium. Their evidence was the fact that Iraq was seeking to reestablish a trade agreement Niger–which by the way, Joe Wilson confirmed. British Intelligence determined that the only purpose for reestablishing trade with Niger would have to be uranium.
“Why the retaliation toward Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame?” In a nutshell — Vice President Cheney heard a report that the Iraqis had been trying to acquire uranium from Niger. In his briefing Cheney asked “What do we know about this?” Later he hears that it was upon his request that Joe Wilson was sent to Niger to confirm this. Knowing that he (Cheney) had not done so, he inquired as to who did request Joe Wilson. It turned out to be Joe Wilson’s wife. Joe Wilson denied this. Cheney wanted the world to know that he did not request Joe Wilson, but that Joe Wilson’s own wife did. NOTE: It was actually Joe Wilson who outed his own wife. In his biography in Who’s Who, it stated that he married “the former Valerie Plame” long before Bob Novak’s article was published.
Joe Wilson came back and wrote his article that stated that Iraq never purchased any yellowcake uranium. But that was not the issue. British Intelligence never claimed they had. The report was that Iraq was SEEKING to purchase yellowcake uranium. BIG DIFFERENCE!
“Why was Scotter Libby pardoned?” HE WASN’T! President Bush commuted his sentence. Again…BIG DIFFERENCE!
“At one time…” Yes, in the 1980s (quite a bit more recent than when we supported slavery and were “mortal enemies” with England) Saddam not only had WMDs but he used them during the Iran-Iraq war and on the Kurds in 1988. The IAEA went in following the 1991 cease fire to rid Iraq of its WMDs, as part of the conditions of the cease fire.
Finally–and for like the third or fourth time–we invaded Iraq because Saddam Hussein failed to comply with the conditions of the 1991 cease fire. The UN Security Council gave its final ultimatum after 12 year of diplomatically trying to convince Saddam Hussein to comply. When the UN made it known they had no intention to follow through on the threat, President Bush issued his own final ultimatum. When Saddam Hussein failed to comply, President Bush kept his word.
You can go on and on about the 4,000 plus Americans who lost their lives. Yes it is very sad and tragic that war kills. But had we not invaded; and Saddam Hussein really had WMDs; and had he used them against our allies or had he placed them into the hands of terrorists (whether al Qaeda, Hamas or any other terrorist group) and they used the weapons; you would have been all over President Bush for not doing more.
The bottom line is this: Almost immediately following the invasion of Iraq, Libya ended its WMD programs. And we are now normalizing relations with Libya. It may have taken 5 1/2 years, but Iraq is slowly but surely improving. We shall see how their new elections take place. NOTE: Our own Revolutionary War took eight years!
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“ENJOY THE NEXT FOUR YEARS OF MARXISM. I HOPE YOU DON’T HAVE SONS THAT WILL BE DRAFTED FOR OBAMA’S “CIVILIAN SECURITY”. MMM, DIDN’T HITLER DO THE SAME THING? FORM HIS OWN “CIVILIAN SECURITY”?”
Only 70 days until Obama is inaugurated as President of the United States, you had better leave the country to stay safe….ROFLMAO
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“Cheney wanted the world to know that he did not request Joe Wilson, but that Joe Wilson’s own wife did. NOTE: It was actually Joe Wilson who outed his own wife.”
1st off Plame did not request Joe Wilson.
2nd, listing his wife’s name is nowhere near the same as calling her an employee of the CIA.
3rd, you’re using Cheney as a source? ROFLMAO
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
The attack on Iraq was an act of great arrogance on the part of the United States done WITHOUT the support of the United NATIONS – and in the end WITHOUT the support of the majority of Iraqis and WITHOUT justification.
United Nations weapons inspectors found no evidence of WMD, giving support to earlier criticism of poor intelligence on Iraqi WMDs. After the invasion, the U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group concluded that Iraq had ended its WMD programs in 1991 and had no active programs at the time of the invasion.
Hussein was tried and hung for killing 138 people after an assassination attempt on his life. How many tens of thousands of deaths have resulted from the American ATTACK on Iraq and what fate should await Bush, Cheney and the other possible war criminals?
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
“The bottom line is this: Almost immediately following the invasion of Iraq, Libya ended its WMD programs. And we are now normalizing relations with Libya.”
Considering Libya has not been a threat since we killed Quadaffyi’s daughter during the 80′s, this is kind of funny.
It also ignores Iran & North Korea ramping up their efforts to become nuclear. It ignores the surge in international terrorism that has followed our invasion of Iraq.
“You can go on and on about the 4,000 plus Americans who lost their lives. Yes it is very sad and tragic that war kills. But had we not invaded; and Saddam Hussein really had WMDs; and had he used them against our allies or had he placed them into the hands of terrorists (whether al Qaeda, Hamas or any other terrorist group) and they used the weapons; you would have been all over President Bush for not doing more.”
I love how blithely push aside the deaths of US service men and women, on Veteran’s day of all days
What callous turn of phrase do you have to describe the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis who have died in this war?
All to prop up some insane what if scenario that had ZERO basis in reality.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Hey Ryan!
Couldn’t agree more. I am SMHID*
I might also be WHSCBSPAL**
*(Shaking My Head In Disbelief)
** (Wondering How Someone Could be So Paranoid and Loony)
McCain called Obama a “Socialist” for the same reason that Obama railed against the “failed policies of George Bush” without naming many of them.
The Campaign tends to encourage opponents to exaggerate, unfortunately…the fringe hangs on to the simplistic messages like a dog with a bone…
Posted by: Wade | November 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
DeefromTexas, you wrote:
“It is possible that Americans should be concerned about Evangelical churches that are teaching hatred and Nazi beliefs, and promoting individuals such as Palin who purposely promoted aggressive reactions from crowds that attended her hatred filled rallies -similar tactics used by Hitler. Remember…the cries of KILL HIM…”
The only thing Gov. Palin was trying to do was to talk about Sen. Obama’s actual record, as she should do as his political opponent in a democracy. Obama and Democrats also talked negatively of McCain and Republicans. And what she said was no smear. She actually brought up very few of the facts that would have put Obama in a very negative light. He has embraced Marxism his whole life, right up until now. He’s only distanced himself enough from it to get elected, and he needed and got the media’s help to whitewash so much of it. I would certainly be willing to review any and all the instances of Marxism in Obama’s life and provide links demonstrating them. Those who deny these links don’t do extensive research into these questions themselves. That research speaks for itself. I’ve also begun to wonder if saying anything critical or negative about Obama is allowable. If isn’t positive about Obama, is then hate?
On the allegation that “kill him” was yelled about Obama, it’s simply untrue. The media reported it, fed the myth, and then never retracted it. There were two alleged incidents, and the Secret Service found nothing to either one. In the first case, the Secret Service said if anything, the outburst a man was made about Ayers, not Obama. In the second case, the Secret Service said they don’t believe it happened. This is the article that started the controversy: “In Fla., Palin Goes for the Rough Stuff as Audience
Boos Obama,” (Washington Post). These are some that clearly show that neither incident happened: “Milbank: Secret Service hasn’t called,” Politico, “Secret Service says ‘Kill him’ allegation unfounded,” Wilkes-Barre Times Leader, “Secret Service looking into Obama threat at rally,” Newsweek, and
“The Secret Service and the Obama Death Threat,” Newsweek. The very last article actually says that Obama angered the Secret Service by saying (during the last debate, I believe) that “kill him” had been yelled about him at Palin rallies, even though the Secret Service had told him the reports were unfounded.
And the latest media travesty on the false “kill him” allegations has just occurred. Newsweek connected a spike in threats against Obama in September and early October to Palin (“Highlights: Newsweek’s Special Election Project”), even though her remarks about Ayers only began in early October and I can’t find any liberal media reports of “frenzied” rallies before then. Now the UK Telegraph has run a story called, “Sarah Palin blamed by the US Secret Service for death threats against Barack Obama,” based on the Newsweek story. It’s really Newsweek blaming her (without reason), not the Secret Service.
Posted by: Erika | November 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“The Campaign tends to encourage opponents to exaggerate, unfortunately”
Can you believe Schwartzenegger of all people saying the time for campaign rhetoric was over.
Not that I perceive him as an ideologue, but statesman?!?!
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“Good! Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you…Good! Your hate has made you powerful.” Emperor Palpatine to Luke Skywalker
Posted by: WorldclaZZ | November 11, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I would agree, however, that most liberals did NOT afford Bush much leeway or respect on his election in 2000. In fact, for those old enough to remember, he was greeted with near riots at his inauguration in 2001.
Before the Iraq War, before 9/11, before anything, he was treated as an usurper.
So, I understand the frustration at now being haughtily asked to show some respect for Obama.
Regardless, to react to the peaceful transfer of power to a president who is as qualified as anybody, and has the potential to be a bad, good, or great president, with the same kind of baseless animosity is to act at the same level of immaturity.
Long-winded way of saying two wrongs don’t make a right, as usual.
I voted McCain, and will show Obama respect, just as McCain and President Bush have done. I may agree with some things he does, and disagree with others.
However, I will try to resist the easy path of black and white evaluation of his leadership, just as I have tried to do with Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush jr., etc. Not everything Bush did was bad (Obama voted “with” him 40-50%, right?)…so with Obama…
So chillathon! You are making yourselves look wacky, just on the other side…Black Helicopter Republicans are no better than Moonbat Liberals!
Posted by: Wade | November 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
“In God We Trust”, that is our national motto, and a very good one.
Those who choose not to believe in God are equally at home in America, and I say “God bless them, too.”
But what I cannot understand is how someone can claim to believe in God and yet not trust him. Don’t you think God had a part in the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States? Or are you saying, “In God We Don’t Trust”?
God Blesses America and our President-Elect. If you choose to believe otherwise, you are going against the greatest democracy in the world and, what is worse, you are going against God.
Posted by: Citizen of Chicago | November 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Ryan:
Hmm, haven’t seen that yet. Sounds like he is being more democratic than republican with his comments about leaving behind fiscal responsibility. Of course, “fiscal responsibility” has been a pretty big joke applied to both R and D in my opinion.
I have always kind of thought that democrats should REALLY be scared of republicans taking power if they actually dropped the “social conservative” ideological plank of the party…(course that would be to my liking…)
What if, hypothetically, the religious, socially conservative part dropped off and you had just small government, low taxes, defense, gun rights, liberty, etc., as the platform, without defense of marriage, abortion stance, prayer in schools, Terri Schiavo sustaining, etc., and yet leaving a lot of the federal structure intact, rather than abolishing this and that as R’s sometimes threaten.
I guess you would have a…rep-libertarian party?
But seriously, I have a very unscientific feeling that were true conservatism to make itself well-defined and drop the social stuff, democrats would have a very tough time competing with that “ideology” at the polls.
Not trying to prove anything, just a thought.
Posted by: Wade | November 11, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Ryan C, so are you going to deny all of the findings of the 9/11 Commission? It was the 9/11 Commission that found that it WAS Joe Wilson’s wife who recommended her husband as the person who should go to Niger.
The issue regarding the outing of Valerie Wilson was the use of her maiden name. That’s because she did her undercover work using the name Valerie Plame.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Wade I think the sad part is how the Republicans implemented smaller government . ..
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This included RECORD overspending.
If ‘small government’ was the goal of the Republican party they failed on a grandly inept and arrogant scale.
My suspicion is a lot of this money went to their buddies in the oil, banking and military/industrial oligarchy.
Posted by: pefros | November 11, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Clem, you wrote:
“Media bias towards Obama. Nah. It’s more like media recognition of McCain lies. That’s the blowback McCain gets for the half-truths and lies from his negative campaign.”
McCain and his campaign did distort a few things, but it was nothing next to the distortions by Obama, his campaign and the media, including that McCain’s was the “negative campaign.” For example, when Karl Rove said both campaigns had been less than completely truthful, the Obama campaign alerted the media that “even Karl Rove” said McCain wasn’t being truthful (what about him saying the same about Obama?) and many in the media reported it (CNN and Time’s Joe Klein, to name just two) just as the Obama campaign spun it. If that isn’t a half-truth, I don’t know what is.
Posted by: Erika | November 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“Hmm, haven’t seen that yet. Sounds like he is being more democratic than republican with his comments about leaving behind fiscal responsibility”
Ok put aside his comments about giving the people programs they want and that fiscal conservatism is a loser politically ;-)
It would be interesting to distill the parties down to their bare ideologies and then see which the people prefer.
But I think the large mushy middle of America prefers the hodge podge candidate vs the pure ideology one.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Ryan C., I did not “blithely push aside” the deaths of our US service men and women. In fact, in an earlier comment I thanked ALL of the men and women who have served our country. And I acknowledge that so many sacrificed their lives or limbs so that we can enjoy the Freedom of Speech that we exercise here on this blog every day.
Sadly a little known fact is that more of our military personnel have lost their lives here at home in the past 5 1/2 years than in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
I’m a McCain Democrat (if there is such a thing)…but I like Obama so far, he is doing the right thing..promoting unity..we must look foward, not backward..I believe he has seen many secret documents that have rocked his midwestern world..IMHO..
I do believe, it is time to let the press act freely without bias from the new admin. .. this is the most important part of our freedom..freedom of the pen! No more ostracizing the bad press…treat everyone (that’s sane) equally!
Posted by: 818 | November 11, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Uhh, do any of y’all actually look at what the Obama-Biden website says about this civilian force you are all so worried about?
Create a Civilian Assistance Corps (CAC): [sic] national CAC of 25,000 personnel…with special skill sets (doctors, lawyers, engineers, city planners, agriculture specialists, police, etc.)…to provide each federal agency with a pool of volunteer experts willing to deploy in times of need… (edited by me for brevity)
Doctors, lawyers, engineers, city planners, ag specialists, aren’t exactly brownshirts. Somehow I don’t see the EPA leading us into Red Dawn…
Posted by: Research is Good | November 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
But Jake, Obama has asserted his desire to create a “civilian national security force.. that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” as “our military.” You can search it and see for yourself.
I say good for the congressman for drawing attention to this. Obama mentioned this IN JULY and no one in his press corps, I mean the mainstream media, has even bothered to ask him about it.
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“Ryan C, so are you going to deny all of the findings of the 9/11 Commission? It was the 9/11 Commission that found that it WAS Joe Wilson’s wife who recommended her husband as the person who should go to Niger”
Hmmmm your last post put that she requested Wilson even implying that she had assigned Wilson.
Now we are reduced to a recommendation.
Walking back the lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
“Sadly a little known fact is that more of our military personnel have lost their lives here at home in the past 5 1/2 years than in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.”
I’ll be charitable and ask that you explain this remark.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Ryan:
Heh. I think you are actually right. Once you get down to it, the candidates are Hobbes’ “leviathans” of their respective “sides” and we usually end up getting someone with pretty mixed “ideologies…”
I think the annoying thing about any political faction (and republicans are particularly, though not exclusively, prone to this) is that it tends to create and advertise an approach that it demands be adhered to 100% of the time. In practice, this is impossible.
Examples: why, if Bush and other republicans were such small government types, they would abolish all federal aid for schools and financial aid (even gov loans) for colleges, not out of animosity, but in keeping with the low taxes, low expenditures philosophy…kind of hard to do that in reality. I know that would have kept me out of school for sure…
Example on the other side (you know I have to)…: why, if health care is a “right,” Obama and democrats would just call for employers to provide a certain level of health care, or pay for it thru a single payer system, or whatever…but we won’t see that, most likely…
What keeps them in check is fear of screwing it up so badly that they lose support at the next go.
The good thing is that enough beefing on both sides keeps the ideologues from getting the crib AND the bottle AND the toys at the same time, I guess.
So we get a mushy middle country after all this campaigning…is that so wrong? :-)…the downside is noone is ever completely satisfied…maybe that is the upside, too.
Posted by: Wade | November 11, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
“So we get a mushy middle country after all this campaigning…is that so wrong? :-)…the downside is noone is ever completely satisfied…maybe that is the upside, too.”
*chuckle*
Thinking of Madison….perhaps this was by design.
Posted by: Ryan C | November 11, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Ryan:
I know! That little puny Madison (i his mid-thirties at drafting time, I think, wow!)
…hey, you know he was mad that he lost an election against a bartender who was really popular, I think…something I remember from a lecture somewhere.
So he set the Constitution up so no one faction could ever dominate for an extended period…yadda yadda.
Posted by: Wade | November 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Ryan C, more of our military personnel have died here at home during training, accidents (involving military planes, military vehicles and personal vehicles), homicides, suicides, accidental drug overdoses, etc.
I made the comment because even those in the military who lose their lives here at home deserve to be remembered and recognized.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I forgot one important category…in the act of heroism here at home. I am reminded of the Marine who had only been home for a couple of weeks and lost his life in an attempt to save his son from drowning.
Posted by: James Danley | November 11, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Today was vetrans day , a holiday, what a joke””’ my son went to school we almost all went to work. We should respect the women and men fighting for our country. help out the famly that stays at home and waits for them to get back from war, pay tribute to all who has fought for this great contry. not by going to school or work, but give thanks to all the brave people that protect us. make it a day for all of them. give what u can if only a prayer.
Posted by: george | November 11, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Broun is now expressing “regret” for calling Obama Marxist, and comparing him to Hitler. Stating, “He didn’t mean it” He’s sorry it sounded that way”. LOL You’ll have to look it up, since they wont allow linking here. Google news gives good returns just by searching on “Broun”.
Why does this seem to be a common recurring theme among conservatives? HIlarious. This guy, after repeat failed attempts at office, finally gets in, then gets a lucky break and survives this year, and now cleanly shoots himself in the foot. No wonder the repubs are in such bad shape.
Listen to all these nuts on here going off about this, flipping out over the coming Obama SS, and now the guy who started it, who they rallied behind is apologizing and saying he didn’t mean it like that at all. Sorry, can’t help it, but,,….. BWAHAHAHAHAHAH…..
Posted by: Paul68 | November 11, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Xenu plans to take a new “control point” body in 2007. An analysis of Markabian scenarios indicates that this will be either the body of, or the body of the adviser to, the President of the United States! From either of these positions, he would be able to exert influence toward the acceptance of a one-world police state. For more data on this, see Sector Operations Bulletin No 19 “Markab, the Final Handling”.
Posted by: JimRon | November 11, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
All of a sudden, the comments die. ;)
Posted by: paul68 | November 12, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
There is an Obama derangement syndrome. I just read that a New York Elementary School has been renamed “Obama Elementary School”.
Come on people! He has not even taken office yet! He has not done anything yet! But people are already naming schools after him?
If that is not derangement, what is?
Posted by: Heather | November 22, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am