Nov 12, 2008 8:59am

Obama to Create White House Office of Urban Policy

On National Public Radio’s "All Things Considered" yesterday, longtime Obama family friend and Obama-Biden transition team co-chair Valerie Jarrett said that the president-elect would, as pledged during the campaign, create an Office of Urban Policy.

Jarrett said the office would "have a comprehensive approach to our urban development," who will be an "advocate for cities" within the White House, taking "all the variety of different federal programs and help target them in a logical and systematic way.

"For those of us who have worked in city governments across the country, we recognize how invaluable that person will be," she said.

Obama discussed this idea in June in a speech before the U.S. Conferen.

"Yes, we need to fight poverty," he said. "Yes, we need to fight crime. Yes, we need to strengthen our cities. But we also need to stop seeing our cities as the problem and start seeing them as the solution. Because strong cities are the building blocks of strong regions, and strong regions are essential for a strong America. That is the new metropolitan reality and we need a new strategy that reflects it -– a strategy that’s about South Florida as much as Miami; that’s about Mesa and Scottsdale as much as Phoenix; that’s about Stamford and Northern New Jersey as much as New York City. As president, I’ll work with you to develop this kind of strategy and I’ll appoint the first White House Director of Urban Policy to help make it a reality."

- jpt

UPDATE: ABC News Polling Director Gary Langer points out that Obama lost small towns and rural areas by 8 points, won suburbs by a scant 2 points, and won cities (population 50,000+) by 28 points, 63-35 percent. (That includes a 59-39 percent margin in cities with a population of 50,000-500,000, and an even wider 70-28 percent margin in cities with more than 500,000 residents.)

User Comments

Spoken like a true Chicago person! This type of BS is why the other half of Illinois wants to be it’s own state! Everything possible for the cities and iiifffffff there is anything left over maybe the rural parts will get something. No wonder it was just the cities that elected him, he doesn’t give a rats behind about the rest of the country.

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Finally, a President for everyone.
POTUS OBAMA – A Beautiful Thing

Posted by: Denmark Vessey | November 12, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Whiners will continue to whine.
POTUS OBAMA will continue to win.
Don’t you cynics get tired of eating “Blackened Crow”? Hee Hee
POTUS OBAMA = Whiner Smasher

Posted by: Denmark Vessey | November 12, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Tisk Tisk Tisk, John Edwards, you could have had the job that would have allowed you to do what you wanted in regards to poverty…
Good idea though, it’s about time these cities got the appropriate attention. Hope they are Por-American enough for you know who.

Posted by: AgeOfDemocrats | November 12, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Al part of Obama’s communitarian policy.

Posted by: Jack | November 12, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

No word on why his “former” metro city of Chicago has the #1 murder rate in the nation (it is a “gun free” zone you know). I don’t think it’s all happening in Lincoln Park. Just sayin… What has he ever done for Chicago, his people, or the State of Illinois. The last Illinois politican that ran on “hope” and “change” in the State of Illinois is it’s soon to be indicted Democratic Governor…

Posted by: Irish Gal | November 12, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Finally, a President for everyone.
POTUS OBAMA – A Beautiful Thing
Posted by: Denmark Vessey | Nov 12, 2008 9:21:16 AM
——————————
A president for everyone? You mean EVERYONE lives in the city???? Or do you just mean that only the important people live in the cities? You can’t be president for everyone, if you only focus on urban areas, now can you!

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Everything possible for the cities and iiifffffff there is anything left over maybe the rural parts will get something. No wonder it was just the cities that elected him, he doesn’t give a rats behind about the rest of the country.
*************************************
It seems that some people fail to acknowledge, that the rural areas offer very little to the young, prospects are dim compared to the city. The city is made up of those who leave the rural areas, if they stayed in the rural areas, those areas would become cities, and face the problems that the cities face. They attract people, but it seems that people are a problenm for those in the rural areas?

Posted by: Thinking | November 12, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Perhaps it is time the rural areas quit producing for and feeding the US cities. US rural areas should market only to foreign cities foreign governments and foreign concerns int he food distribution business.
The US cities of course would be free to buy the products back from overseas companies far more elevated prices then they pay to domestic and mostly Rural producers.

Posted by: Fed up with the urban city hogs | November 12, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

He won my small town in Iowa of 6,000. He won most small towns around here. I would like to know how or where they get their figures.

Posted by: Enviro | November 12, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

samhiguchi and geevil are the people that have made the same commentary and arguments that got us the last decade or so…
Obama needs to focus on energy…
energy revolution
energy revolution
energy revolution
all the “oil” morons
and the drill drill drill bologne
and the people who keep spouting bologne about Obama
need to take a look at the new announcement from the IEA…
we are in a world of hurt…
that is about to become a world of “####”…
Thank God Mccain did not get elected… and Thank God Bush is almost done…
the predictions from the IEA (and these include oil people) are BAAAD.
we need to switch our entire country AND be able to leverage China and India to do the same.
this is the crossroads and Obama better get on the energy innovation train TODAY…
priority one by a million miles… every sentence they should be talking about is “new energy sources”
especially for cities.

Posted by: dl | November 12, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Thinking. Great post. I am excited because my husband is an Urban Planner working right now UNHAPPILY as a grant writer. He is extatic because he sees his oppertnities as a planner increasing with this kind of program.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 12, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Urban power!

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Boy I never thought this would happen but I think samhiguchi has a point here.
I know the poverty in inner cities but I also know the poverty in rural America.
There is no difference between a poor family in an inner city neigborhood like Harrison in Newark NJ or Lebanon in Camden NJ and a poor family in the hills of Western Virgina where people are still using wells and pit toilets or in Amish country in PA where we are aware of the Amish lifestyle which by all American standards is poor (even if this is by choice).
President Obama should appoint an Inner City Czar as well as a Poverty Czar to take care of Rural America.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
I would even suggest that the cabinet level positions should be combined Inner City/Poverty Czar.
John Edwards anyone? Yes I know if he can just keep his pants up -:) -:) -:)

Posted by: Steve_NJ | November 12, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

dl if O was so concerned about our economy and the world economy he would at a minimum attend the economic summit with the other world leaders…he was invited, but is choosing to stay in Chicago instead. He wants to get a jump start, but won’t attend something that will bring him insight at the least. As for oil and no drilling, I hope your home and your car are the first to run out while we are waiting for the alternatives (because it’s not like they are available to everyone right now)

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Steve_NJ I will have to excuse myself now, as I think I might have a heart attack LOL Who says there isn’t a first time for everything!

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Keep a close watch on how this ACORN grows into a giant kudzu vine.

Posted by: smith | November 12, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Fed up with the urban city hogs
re: “Perhaps it is time the rural areas quit producing for and feeding the US cities.”
spoken like a true repub/conserv reactionary,..
always looking to divide…
btw:
Farming no longer anchors the rural economy as it did through the mid-20th century. Today, seven out of eight rural counties are dominated by manufacturing, services, and other employment not related to farming.
Despite these changes, rural and farm communities are becoming increasingly interdependent. Job growth in agricultural areas is now more likely to come from rural industries related to farming than from farming itself.
Industries involving agricultural inputs, processing and marketing of agricultural goods, wholesale and retail trade of agricultural products, and agribusiness have increased their presence in rural communities.

Posted by: Blue | November 12, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

sam – “he would at a minimum attend the economic summit with the other world leaders…he was invited, but is choosing to stay in Chicago instead. ” Perhaps he feels that as he is not President he should not be there. Maybe he sent someone instead.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 12, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

samhiguchi,
I know. Outside politics we can afford to agree with good ideas. Afterall we are all Americans.
I would even agree with Gee Evil, unfortunately I have never seen any good idea from my Repub friend and fellow prisoner.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | November 12, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

A president for everyone? You mean EVERYONE lives in the city???? Or do you just mean that only the important people live in the cities? You can’t be president for everyone, if you only focus on urban areas, now can you!
Posted by: samhiguchi | Nov 12, 2008 9:42:58 AM
=======
What the heck are you talkin about? Urban population is his base, his support, his home. If our Greatest Leader does not take care of ‘em, who will? You got to give our Dearest Comrade some time to get to you lowly educated bitter people in the countryside. Power comes from the barrel of the gun, excuse me, from the popular candies of urban welfare.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Some of you who are complaining about urban policy and rural needs should take a look at the ratio of American city tax payments and revenues returned. American cities have always paid significantly more than they’ve received from the federal government.
Who do you think paid for “the road to the bridge to nowhere” and the rest of the pork? How many of Brooklyn’s 100 year old schools could have been modernized with that money?

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 12, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Sam – give it rest, will you?

Posted by: geecee | November 12, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Translation: I owe Mayor Richie Daley BIG TIME.

Posted by: Roxie | November 12, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Well lets see for the past 8 years the Republicans have catered to the Gun toting bible Religious freaks, without big cities and their Business there would be no rual areas most of your people that live on welfare are found in the Rual areas,People that live in the cities pay higher taxes!

Posted by: Angie | November 12, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Sam – give it rest, will you?
Posted by: geecee | Nov 12, 2008 10:32:44 AM
—————————–
I am perfectly prepared to give it a rest and even give O a chance, but when he does stupid stuff, I’m here to spout my objections. I find this particular issue close to my heart. I was born and raised in a small town in So IL, I have seen them suffer, I know how hard they fight for hand me downs, because Chicago comes first. I have lived my life with a lot of the BS you see written here about city people being more educated, city people being more important….In school our teachers used to instruct us on the proper way to speak, to rid us of any accent, because city people would make fun of us and think us stupid! I didn’t understand that until I moved to Cali, and after about the 3rd time of being made fun of you adapt…which to me is ridiculous. I am so tired of city people thinking they are so much better, so much more deserving because they live in the city. With a president elect thinking the same thing…OY! I will take a million of those rural folks for any 1 of your city people! They are every bit as deserving of help as anyone in the city.

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

OT:
Congrats to Jake T. He has been promoted to the New Chief White House Correspondent for ABC. Thanks for the power, pop and probings. You have been a rare gem in the MSM’s unbelievably biased election coverage.

Posted by: Fan | November 12, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Well lets see for the past 8 years the Republicans have catered to the Gun toting bible Religious freaks, without big cities and their Business there would be no rual areas most of your people that live on welfare are found in the Rual areas,People that live in the cities pay higher taxes!
Posted by: Angie | Nov 12, 2008 10:41:32 AM
—————————
Now that’s funny!!!! (and uninformed)

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 12, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Obama did nothing for Chicago as a Community Organizer.
He did nothing for Chicago as an Illinois Senator.
He has done nothing for Chicago “The NEW Murder Capital” as a US Senator.
So, I doubt he will do anything meaningful as President. But, hey, he inspires hope and change. Well, hope… er… He inspires people to vote for him.

Posted by: Pragmatist | November 12, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Nubtail,
Rural America receives more welfare in pork barrel projects and farm subsidies than inner cities in America.
In addition please educate yourself and stop believing this myth about blacks and welfare.
Per capita and as a percentage of the total, there are more whites on welfare than blacks. The reverse is true for jails though so you may have a point there.
BTW as someone already pointed out, cities pay more taxes than rural counties and get less in return because the bulk of Uncle Sam handouts goes to rural states and counties.
The problem is that these subsidies go to rich farmers and rural-based manufacturers.
That is why President Obama should concentrate on alleviating the condition of the Rural and Inner City poor directly with programs that reach them and not some fat cat big farmers or industrialists.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | November 12, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

QWow; “Office of Urban Hand-outs!” Who didn’t see that coming???

Posted by: Planewizard | November 12, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Given the population centers are urban areas and large population centers drive the electroal college, I suspect that Mr. Obama is very smart to start making sure that when he needs another $600M to run for president in four years that he gets it from the very same places that just elected him. Smart, sly politician. The first “earmark” for his constiuency.

Posted by: Jack | November 12, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

I’d really like to see the statistics by population density, but here’s my gut feeling:
Crime – Big city problem.
Teen Pregnancy – Bigger rural problem.
Teen Suicide – Bigger rural problem.
Teen Addiction – Bigger rural problem.
Suicide in General – Bigger rural problem.
Poverty – Bigger rural problem
Availability of resources – Urban areas have more “help” resources.
In general, my gut feeling is that, by population density, rural areas have bigger problems than cities.
Any sociologists out there can verify??

Posted by: Planewizard | November 12, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Sam -
I also grew up in a rural small town in Illinois, but I think you’re letting your personal resentments cloud your judgment. Believe me, there are plenty of people from New York and New Jersey who have had to “revise” their accents to be accepted in the work place.
Given the fact that most people in NYC have come here from somewhere else, I don’t know of anyone who looks down on rural or small town America. I do know a lot of people, however, who look down on those who try to pit Americans against Americans in order to win elections.
Urban, rural, small town…we’re all Americans and we all have more in common than we have differences.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 12, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I am a reluctant supporter of Obama, but this is what’s up. If this happens major accoomplishment. Go Obama

Posted by: rachel | November 12, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Obama to Create White House Office of Urban Policy
==================
Man, talking about big government. The last time I checked, the “government” has a branch under its wing called US Department of Housing and Urban Development, or HUD. I guess one Secretary of HUD is not enough for our Greatest Smartest Leader, he will have one in his White House. But, but, but, wait a minute, isn’t HUD already in the White House?

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Perhaps because his Harvard Smart is so cool, he has a real distinction between Urban Policy and Urban Development.
Technically, policy belongs to lips, his big mouth, while development belongs to action, someone else’s problem.
I suppose our Greatest Leader is Smartest.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

He inspires people to vote for him.
Posted by: Pragmatist | Nov 12, 2008 10:49:57 AM
=====================
No, he did not inspire people to vote for him. It is that idiot George W. Bush pushed people to vote for him.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

I do not know if any of these ideas are doable. I just want to bring up these points as possible solutions to strengthen our urban areas. The strength of our schools is part of the equation for a healthy community.
I remember reading once that the brain is most productive between too many external stimuli to that of not enough. Certain hormones and brain chemistry start to happen at both ends of the stimuli input spectrum. This is why if one is trying to sit still listening to a boring lecture, one basically stops listening. When someone is having a conflict with someone, this causes excess stress and the brain is not at its best. At both ends, problem solving, productivity, and creativity stops. We need to change the culture of long lectures and long times on the job and in the classroom.
We need to find creative ways for people to solve conflicts.
We need to begin programs of jobs sharing. For example, let us bring in people from the community to teach some classes within our schools. Bankers could teach money management to our students. Car repair personnel could teach basic car knowledge within our schools. Human resource people would teach how to find a job. This will break up the day for these workers. In return, they will be more productive on their private sector jobs when they return.
Based on the brain research, students’ class days should also be broken up. Perhaps the schools could have several field trips to private companies. There, they could learn about these companies and perhaps make contacts for future jobs.
Some people learn best by listening. Some people learn best by seeing things in writing or as diagrams.
Others learn best by tactile or by hand. A typical classroom requires the student to listen a lot. When it comes to teaching, we need to be aware of the learning styles of any person. Perhaps DVDs could include a lot of things in written or diagram forms. The DVDs could be handed out. A 3-d model could be handed out as well. These DVDs or models could complement any learning system.
Let us maybe begin a city/schools partnership to hire a few couples of successful counselors to teach conflict resolution to people of all ages. Are there conflicts between neighbors, neighbor’s kids, married couples, parents to kids or between students? These couple of counselors could step in to negotiate solutions to people. They could use appropriate DVDs to be handed out to help educate people.
The counselors could also hand out DVDs about resources available in the community on their particular problem. Could it be about finances between married couples? Could neighborhood kids be having a conflict? Could parents find better ways to raise their kids? Cities could partner with the private sector to produce these DVDs.
I am not sure if any or all these ideas are doable. I just wanted to get these ideas out there for community leaders to consider.

Posted by: dave | November 12, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Dear Republicans, give Obama a chance to clean up the mess that Bush and the Republicans have made without being so bitter. I’ve seen frantic Republicans wonder how they can win people back. Well, as in the campaign, my impression is that Republicans are mean-spirited, and your posted comments certainly support this impression. No longer a Republican, Sandra

Posted by: Sandra | November 12, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

So HUD isn’t enough? Housing and Urban Development can’t handle this?
I’m beginning to suspect Obama is not going to be able to go line by line through the budget and find programs that don’t work. He’s already talking about growing the government.

Posted by: MayBee | November 12, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Oh, congratulations to Jake!
You have been a bright spot this political season. You’ve made me laugh and you’ve made me mad.

Posted by: MayBee | November 12, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Dear Sandra
I do not think President Bush had a thing to do with the mess in the urban core.

Posted by: smith | November 12, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Obama didn’t help the poor constituents in his own
Chicago district. They lived in deplorable conditions.

Posted by: Michelle | November 12, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

You know I saw this coming as anyone with ears should have. Handouts, and we all know Obama’s black voters are his target community. Yeah, his net will include some non-blacks but that has been his agenda all along. But you know what? I’m time for the black community to have reason to gloat, and hopefully reason to crawl out of poverty with a boost. If we are going to go down economically, we might as well go down at least making a good attempt to help those that if given a job, a decent place to live and hope for a future, maybe they will get out of the 40% of American’s who don’t pay taxes bracket. Maybe we will see a return on this investment. I’m not for handouts and I certainly will not benefit from his plan, but I’m just tired of hearing how ignored, down trodden, no opportunities, drug ridden and so on the black community is. Let’s give it a try. No, I did not vote for Obama, with 21 years of legal experience behind me I heard more than the average excited voter did to be part of a historic moment. I heard what he said and all I’m surprised about is how quickly he is putting his plans in motion. He’s a Socialist for sure, he told you all along and now he’s President. If the poor blow it, well it will truly be a historic moment because no one will support this type of program full heartedly again. One rule I do have as an American, short of him putting kids in uniforms and singing his praises every morning in Obama military school, I do believe in supporting the person this country voted to be their leader. I’ll support him until he starts ruling and not governing.

Posted by: Maggie | November 12, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

WOW…just we need…ANOTHER government agency to screw things up even more!
Change we need….
This is just the same as when Carter created the Dept of Education in 1979! Yeah…that Really worked Well !!!!
Today we have a school system that can’t produce kids who understand basic math and expect “someone” to help them whenever something hard comes along! No wonder there are more people becoming democrats, they still want someone to do the homework for them.

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

HUD is probably different than what this would be intended for. Urban centers have specific problems and solutions.
I’d like to see Akif Malik, the guy who had the Olympic bid vision for Chicago back in the early 90′s, get involved in something like this for Obama. Someone like him has the big picture understanding of transforming urban areas with solutions that have direct and indirect benefits.

Posted by: Jim | November 12, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Michelle, you do have a good point. But, Obama apparently looks at the “big” picture. In order to get to a second term, he has to politically feed those 40% he promised to take care of. He’s just delivering on his promise. Now his half brother, half aunt can fend for themselves, not a big enough picture and apparently the generosity fails him when the numbers are not big enough. I was shocked to see where his grandmother lived. If I had been Obama I would have taken care of her like a queen, but then as he said in his book, he wanted to distance himself from his Mother’s white side and I guess he did that. Shrewd man. Scary but hey he’s what the majority of America wanted.

Posted by: Maggie | November 12, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Most urban areas are and have historically been run by Democrats, lock stock and barrel. Most are also broke and crime-ridden, as a result of those Democrat administrations with their failed policies and cronyism. Their situations have nothing to do with Republican policies or the Federal government except to be given more money to waste and send down a rat hole. So how is more of the same of that from Obama going to help? The Office of Urban Planning is nothing but Obama keeping his promise to Acorn to give them a policy setting role in the government, even though he lied and tried to minimize his relationship with that fraudulant, militant, Marxist organization all through the campaign. Are we suckers or what for electing this guy.

Posted by: yellowrose | November 12, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Now his half brother, half aunt can fend for themselves, not a big enough picture and apparently the generosity fails him when the numbers are not big enough. I was shocked to see where his grandmother lived. If I had been Obama I would have taken care of her like a queen, but then as he said in his book, he wanted to distance himself from his Mother’s white side and I guess he did that. Shrewd man. Scary but hey he’s what the majority of America wanted.
Posted by: Maggie | Nov 12, 2008 12:08:23 PM
——————-
Indeed. Apparently he had decided to distance himself from his Father’s black side, too.
Of course, he will not distance himself from us 95% Middle Class of a united state. We are his base to fight against you 5% filthy rich lawyers and bourgeoisie capitalists.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Perhaps, our Greatest Leader really has seen that HUD did not work so well. He will take a new approach, make it up side down, or front side back.
Let’s give it a try for his DUH.

Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | November 12, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

When we can walk the streets of our cities safely, we will have won a great internal war. Let us hope that urban crime will be one of the main foci of this newly created office.

Posted by: Shockolit | November 12, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

You know this is really ironic. Have any of his people seen his district in Chicago? Has anyone ever read the Chicago newspapers? What about the money given to developers only to have the properties fall into disrepair, only to give the developers more money. This is how he knows Valerie Jarrett.
Also ironic is all the flack the Governor has taken about using his airplane. The Obamas took separate private airplanes to Washington, but arrived at the White House in the same limo to hide the fact? Michelle wanted to check out the private schools? Hmm. Wake up people.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | November 12, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

It has been a week since the defeat and some of you GOPers arestill very bitter, clinging to your vile insults of President-Elect Obama.
When is this gonna end.
Please cling to your Bibles instaed and pray to the good Lord Almighty to help you “get over it”.
It is painful I know, but the sooner you get over it the better for your health.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | November 12, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

It has been a week since the defeat and some of you GOPers arestill very bitter, clinging to your vile insults of President-Elect Obama.
When is this gonna end.
Please cling to your Bibles instaed and pray to the good Lord Almighty to help you “get over it”.
It is painful I know, but the sooner you get over it the better for your health.
Posted by: Steve_NJ
Steve,
As a typical liberal, you once again confuse the issues and have zero understanding of the real world.
The last thing this country needs is another federal department of anything. All this is amounts to is yet another hole the bucket of our tax dollars for yet another failed liberal social experiment. You & Obama had better figure out fast that the bucket is already empty and we can’t aford anymore dopry liberal ideas.

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

How about some facts.
“Two-thirds of our population lives in the top 100 metropolitan areas, and 84 percent of Americans live in all 363 metros.”
“America’s small-town romance has outlived its accuracy by at least 100 years.”
“Self-sufficient small towns don’t need mass transit and high-speed rail networks, but interconnected metros do. A politician who ignores this economic and demographic reality risks making serious policy mistakes, such as misdirecting the public investments that we need to survive in an era of intense global competition.”
For a good article, Google
“We aren’t a nation of small towns”

Posted by: Young Atheart | November 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

“How about some facts.”
—————————–
More evidence on how easy it is to only tell part of the story!
A. Obama is talking about “urban” not “metropolitan”!
B. From the same article :
“But the 1910 census was the last one in which rural Americans represented a majority of the population; these days, we’ve become a thoroughly metropolitan nation. Two-thirds of our population lives in the top 100 metropolitan areas, and 84 percent of Americans live in all 363 metros. Being in a metro means being tied to someplace else; the Census Bureau defines metropolitan areas as a city of 50,000 or more, plus the adjacent counties that have close social and economic ties to the urban core.”
Obama is not talking about this dopey department helping those adjacent counties! This thing is going to be another liberal earmark to eat money and produce no viable solutions, while it promises to make inner city & urban areas better.
We have been hearing this for decades, with no real results other than a lot of money wasted!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

If Kwame just could’ve held on a few more months!

Posted by: Jeff | November 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

So much liberal wealth envy. Typical!

Posted by: Pavel | November 12, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

In addition to crime, I can see in the proposed Office of Urban Policy an oversight of all funds directed to solve city problems. Too much money goes to greedy administrators, fraud and corruption. Of course, that assumes the overseers are going to be honest.

Posted by: Shockolit | November 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

In addition to crime, I can see in the proposed Office of Urban Policy an oversight of all funds directed to solve city problems. Too much money goes to greedy administrators, fraud and corruption. Of course, that assumes the overseers are going to be honest.
Posted by: Shockolit
————————————–
Itis ging to be EXACTLY like the Dept. of Ed. Instead of its chief advocate being the NEA, it will be ACORN!
The dept of Ed has squandered trillions since its creation, and the result is the dumbing down of this great country!
This new Dept. will do for the inner cities what the Dept of Ed has done to our schools !

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Good government types are heralding these (anti-lobbying) steps (by President-elect Obama) — since they are unprecedented.
“The ethical guidelines released today for the Obama transition are tough and unequivocal.”
Thomas Mann, Brookings Institution
“This ethics policy is a statement about the tone and tenor of the Obama administration. It is a good sign.”
Norm Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute

Posted by: pefros | November 12, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Wait, how was the department of homeland security any less dopey than this?

Posted by: David | November 12, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

No, he did not inspire people to vote for him. It is that idiot George W. Bush pushed people to vote for him.
Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | Nov 12, 2008 11:20:51 AM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Will get over your obama just like you liberals got over President George W Bush….NEVER.

Posted by: Monica | November 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

No, he did not inspire people to vote for him. It is that idiot George W. Bush pushed people to vote for him.
Posted by: Follower of Dearest Greatest Leader | Nov 12, 2008 11:20:51 AM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Will get over your obama just like you liberals got over President George W Bush….NEVER.

Posted by: Monica | November 12, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

OH GOODIE!!!!!!! MORE NEWARKS and BALTIMORES.

Posted by: stan | November 12, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Good government types are heralding these (anti-lobbying) steps (by President-elect Obama) — since they are unprecedented.
“The ethical guidelines released today for the Obama transition are tough and unequivocal.”
Thomas Mann, Brookings Institution
“This ethics policy is a statement about the tone and tenor of the Obama administration. It is a good sign.”
Norm Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute
Posted by: pefros
—————————————
Are you kidding, EVERY new administration ALWAYS says they are going to be the most ehical in history!
Then they ALL have their share of embarassing idiots who have to resign in shame or face legal action.
There is absoultely ZERO new here!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

MikeC:
Those aren’t my opinions on the rules President-elect Obama put in place for his transition team.
Nor are they imaginings about some hypothetical future, nor a simple reporting of what somebody ‘says’ they are going to do – these are publicly stated rules Obama has put in place regarding lobbyists.
And the quotes are the studied assessments from two of America’s well-respected watchdog public policy institutes (Brookings Institute and American Enterprise Institute) – and as is stated these rules are “unprecedented”, “tough and unequivocal”.
Of course Mike I’m sure your ‘valued assessment’ is far better.

Posted by: pefros | November 12, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

RL in ILL
re: “Michelle wanted to check out the private schools? Hmm. Wake up people. ”
with all the nutty postings here and the
vile stuff being said about Obama around the country, I would be very cautious as well with where my kids went to school……

Posted by: Blue | November 12, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

monica
re: ‘Will get over your obama just like you liberals got over President George W Bush….NEVER.’
old ‘W’ certainly has left his mark on America, it might take a generation to recover from the damage he and his administration have done and continue to do….. Dems will be over Bush very soon, ….the country however, will suffer from Bush for a long time and will not have the choice to ‘get over’ it.

Posted by: I know rural America | November 12, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Perf,
I am stating historical FACT. I could care less what dopey organization thinks of any guidelines or rule set.
There has not been any form of human government that has not had ethical problems.
No one cares what some foolish crap is said today about how he picks the members of his administration. The only thing that counts is what these people do when they are in office!
If you are stupid enough to believe the “messiah” is going to only appoint the “purest of heart”, then you need to buy a lot of AIG stock!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | November 12, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

the last thing our cities need are more bureaucrats. we have them by the truckload.our cities need less crime.and i got news for you, obama isn’t the man to lower the crime rate.the cities are done, run by gangs selling drugs.

Posted by: jim | November 12, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

p.s. – are people perfect ethical creatures – oh course not – get real!

Posted by: pefros | November 12, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

If you lived in DC, you’d send your kids to private school too. Besides they go to a private school now so what’s the prob.

Posted by: annie | November 12, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

MikeC:
Those aren’t my opinions on the rules President-elect Obama put in place for his transition team.
Nor are they imaginings about some hypothetical future, nor a simple reporting of what somebody ‘says’ they are going to do – these are publicly stated rules Obama has put in place regarding lobbyists.
And the quotes are the studied assessments from two of America’s well-respected watchdog public policy institutes (Brookings Institute and American Enterprise Institute) – and as is stated these rules are “unprecedented”, “tough and unequivocal”.
Are people perfect ethical creatures – of course not! Get real!
Are these rules a major attempt to rein in the lobbyists who have been helping to run Washington – of course!
Tough, unequivocal and unprecedented . .. .

Posted by: pefros | November 12, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Mike, I once worked for a very large school district in a non-teaching capacity. If the national education level is run even half as badly as that was, I can see why we are getting dumbed down. Most funds are wasted.
A metropolitan area will always be helped by curing the ills of the urban area at its center.
We may not succeed, but we should still try. Who says that the cures are handouts?

Posted by: Shockolit | November 12, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Maybe if we start paying attention to the inner cities and working on them the crime rates may go down. You have to break the cycle somehow to make any progress. Give these young adults a sense of pride and accomplishment, and you will see improved results.

Posted by: Jwench | November 12, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I am happy that he will care about the poor. Obama will follow what he truly believes is just for our nation. Even if he is in charge for only 8 years (I hope)- at least families will have a chance during that time.

Posted by: Independant American Woman | November 12, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

That’s why we elected him,,, shut up.

Posted by: Lucky Lucy | November 12, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

WOW…just we need…ANOTHER government agency to screw things up even more!
Change we need….
This is just the same as when Carter created the Dept of Education in 1979! Yeah…that Really worked Well !!!!
Today we have a school system that can’t produce kids who understand basic math and expect “someone” to help them whenever something hard comes along! No wonder there are more people becoming democrats, they still want someone to do the homework for them.
Posted by: Mike_C | Nov 12, 2008 12:01:58 PM
—————————————-
Hopefully you’re smart enough to realize the president sets the direction and tone that federal agencies take. Fema is a prime example fof how an incompetent, inept president can screw things up. Obama has proven to be far from incompetent or inept.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | November 13, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

It’s obvious Obama haters here hate Obama for something other than what he has done; since he has yet to take office and do anything to justify their hate. What couls it be???? Is it because he’s Black and racist just can stand the thought of a Black man being POTUS? They have absolutely no credibility to argue against Obama or his decisions as of now. Good grief, he hasn’t even taken office. These are the same people that gave unwavering support to Bush and republicans as they lied us into war, looted the treasury and mismanaged our resources. They need to shut up, sit back and observe how intelligent adults handle the nation’s business. Country First, Racist Last.

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Corporations First | November 13, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.