Nov 30, 2008 12:13pm

Obama’s Big Test on Education

My former Washington City Paper colleague Amanda Ripley has a cover story in this week’s TIME about the DC chancellor of schools Michelle Rhee, who "has promised to make Washington the highest-performing urban school district in the nation, a prospect that, if realized, could transform the way schools across the country are run. She is attempting to do this through a relentless focus on finding–and rewarding–strong teachers, purging incompetent ones and weakening the tenure system that keeps bad teachers in the classroom."

Rhee, Ripley writes, "wants to make Washington teachers the highest paid in the country, and in exchange she wants to get rid of the weakest teachers. Where she and the teachers’ union disagree most is on her ability to measure the quality of teachers."

Interestingly, though Rhee is a Democrat, she almost voted for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

"It was a very hard decision," Rhee says. "I’m somewhat terrified of what the Democrats are going to do on education."

What does President-elect Obama think? Tough to say. He has supported merit pay for teachers, which teachers’ unions oppose, and heralded Rhee. He has been a strong advocate of charter schools and in 2002 said he was "not closed minded" on the subject of vouchers, though since then he has come out against vouchers. Over the Summer, I asked him why.

"The problem is, is that, you know, although it might benefit some kids at the top, what you’re going to do is leave a lot of kids at the bottom," he said. "We don’t have enough slots for every child to go into a parochial school or a private school. And what you would see is a huge drain of resources out of the public schools. So what I’ve said is let’s foster competition within the public school system. Let’s make sure that charter schools are up and running. Let’s make sure that kids who are in failing schools, in local school districts, have an option to go to schools that are doing well.

"But what I don’t want to do is to see a diminished commitment to the public schools to the point where all we have are the hardest-to-teach kids with the least involved parents with the most disabilities in the public schools," Obama continued. "That’s going to make things worse, and we’re going to lose the commitment to public schools that I think have been so important to building this country."

In March, Josh Patashnik of The New Republic took a closer look at PEBO and education, writing that Obama "has long advocated a reformist agenda that looks favorably upon things like competition between schools, test-based accountability, and performance pay for teachers. But the Obama campaign has hesitated to trumpet its candidate’s maverick credentials. As an increasingly influential chorus of donors and policy wonks pushes an agenda within the Democratic Party that frightens teachers’ unions and their traditional liberal allies, Obama seems unsure how far he can go in reassuring the former group that he’s one of them without alienating the latter. And this is a shame, because Obama may represent the best hope for real reform in decades."

Likely not encouraging Rhee is Obama’s pick to head up his transition efforts on education: Stanford education professor Linda Darling-Hammond, whom many in the education reform community eye warily, as too closely allied with teachers unions. 

Members of the pro-reform group Democrats for Education Reform  see Darling-Hamilton as someone who thinks more funding is the answer and say "Darling-Hammond’s approach is dangerous. Without genuine reform, money pumped into a district like Newark is wasted."The liberal American Prospect suggests that Obama’s naming Darling-Hammond, "a teacher quality expert who opposes merit pay and is more critical than supportive of NCLB, signals that Obama wishes to avoid a fight with the unions. He’ll spend his political capital on energy and health care instead."

On a personal note, after they move to Washington DC, the Obamas are planning to send their daughters to the elite private school Sidwell Friends.

Mr. Obama seems to have some reformist impulses, but it will be interesting to see how they play out.

- jpt

User Comments

i heard this brewing on tv yesterday, and was thinking when is jpt going to jump on the bandwagon.
i believe obama will use the advice of ms.rhee. if what she is wanting to do is def. working.
as far as the school his girls are going to.
hillary and bill sent their girl there.
and no one complained.
the obama should be able to send their girls there also.
and for the silly people who think the obama’ should be sending their children to one of the dangerous for the children who live in the neighborhood
schools, just to prove a point, are just plain silly.
the thing is half of the people on tv complaining about the school their girls are going to, do NOT send their children to the public schools in dc.
so i would like for everyone on tv and in print before they say or write against the obama and their school pick,
they should have to say where their child goes to school.

Posted by: sugar | November 30, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

no big test here,
obama and co. know what needs to be done to fix the public school systems in this nation.
and it is not to come up with a catchy name for the plan.
“No child left behind” has left most of the children behind.
once again, no big test here.
obama will do the right thing for public schools.

Posted by: sugar | November 30, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

DC schools are a disaster. 70% of graduates don’t even have basic reading abilities. We need to tell the children Puff Daddy bad, Isaac Newton good. Beyonce, Spears, and Madonna whoress, Madam Curie classy. Make a rap about James Clerk Maxwell, Michael Faraday, Teller, Feinmann, Einstein, Heisenberg and Scroedinger.

Posted by: Huh | November 30, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

O made to many promises to unions (all of them) to fix any problems without their support and they aren’t going to do anything but business as usual.

Posted by: samhiguchi | November 30, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Hopefully Obama will be able to do something about the public schools in dc and america as a whole, but for anyone to expect him to send his kids to a public in dc is crazy not only in an edcuation stand point but a safety stand point for his kids and a stablity stand point for his kids. His kids have been going to a private school since they started to school they will go through enough changes let them keep private school stablity.

Posted by: rachel | November 30, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

sugar – I work in the research and design community at a national laboratory out west. We can’t find applicants to carry out certain functions, These applicants need to be US citizens that can qualify for a Q level security clearance. We can find plenty of knowledgeable people from other countries to do the work, but they can’t qualify for the clearance level. The US is becoming dumber by the day so for me it is a bit personal. Engineering is hard. Today’s kids are more interested in the trashy people I listed instead of where there attention should truly be. The antics of Lohan, Spears and Hilton is front page news while science is often an afterthought. The US is going down. With economies improving around the world, a reverse brain drain is going to take place.

Posted by: Huh | November 30, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

In due course . . .

Posted by: Yankee | November 30, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Until chikdren are taught at home to respect other people and how to behave in public so teachers can actually teach when they come to school and not have to discipline kids every few minutes then I don’t see any improvement in store for our public schools. Paying teachers more is a nice thought, but where will we get the money. I live in Illinois. Illinois is broke and is thinking about cutting funding for our schools. Raising property taxes to give the schools more cash is out the question. Illinois property owners are about all tapped out.

Posted by: Sandy | November 30, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

I wonder if all those folks complaining about the Obamas sending their girls to a private school, have any more than a snowball’s notion in hell of what chaos would occur if the girls went to a DC public school. (1) DC public schools are notorious for poor performance; (2)DC public schools are breeding grounds for gangs; (3)most DC schools are grossly delapidated & inadequate to support the use of technical teaching and learning tools; (4) most DC schools are reputed to be unsafe for most students; (5)most DC schools are over-crowded with poor student/teacher ratios; (6)accommodating the security details assigned to the girls would be impossible in DC public schools. The Obama girls have always attended a private school with high academic standards. Why on earth would any parent want to change that paradigm?

Posted by: nanameow | November 30, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Okay, despite the fact that I am, obviously, not an Obama follower, I think he has every right to choose where his kids go to school. Solid and unwavering. I’d yell that from the rooftops if necessary.
Part of the reason I’m not a follower is that I don’t believe he wants everyone else to have that same right. None of his “plans” for improving the broken education system indicate that at all, not when you look at them closely.
I homeschool, and Obama wants everyone to be in lockstep. That does not bode well for those who don’t WANT their kids in the education mills that are so very broken. And I fully expect to hear from the uninformed about how homeschooling leads to poor socialization. You have a sick idea of what socialization should be if you think schools offer it. My kid can relate to anyone at any level with intelligence and manners. Not common, and always commented on with surprise by others. And she has a case full of trophies won in her chosen sport.
Here’s how to start fixing the public schools, if anyone cares: DROP the latest pop-psychology fads in teaching methods, STOP insisting that every kid be drugged into staring attention if they act like a normal kid, but still expect kids to behave (!), enforce discipline and consequences (not paddles, or rulers across the knuckles, but NO tolerance for misbehavior), and for heaven’s sake TEACH. Most especially get the pop-psych feel-good garbage out! If anyone was paying attention, since that was started some time ago, behaviors and the “need” for drugs have have skyrocketed. Cause and effect that no-one in charge wants to see.
But instead, in the future I see all levels of education being dragged down so nobody fails or gets their feelings hurt, increased violence because we daren’t punish, and the good students crushed or corrupted.
All I want is to be left out of his grand plans. And to know that he’s not going to go after and screw up a system that works for so many (homeschooling) just because he wants everyone to be “on a level playing field.” But his kind are very quick to hobble, if not amputate, someone else’s leg to ensure “fair competition.”
So, let him choose his kids’ schools. He has that right. And let us choose ours.

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | November 30, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Real progress in the DC schools will come when the community strengthens it’s social fabric. Money for higher salaries to attract and keep good teachers is worthy but when these valuables teachers have to spend all their time dealing with the associated challenges of children whose parents give birth to them as teenagers; fractured, disorganized extended families where too many fathers are in prison. That’s not even to speak of the drugs and violence in these neighborhoods where the culture values rap stars and basketball players over men like Barack Obama who have succeeded through education. If Obama does nothing else, he shows the children in these neighborhoods that there is another way. Nothing will change until the culture of these neighborhoods really changes.

Posted by: bct | November 30, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Right! We need to destroy all unions everywhere. Teachers need to brown nose and beg just like the rest of us.
(sarcasm for those unable to tell)

Posted by: jan | November 30, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Huh, you are absolutely right!! Children are just pawns in our society these days. They are born, not to be loved, they are just for someones use.
They are sent to school for babysitting, parents don’t care whether or not they learn anything, it is made to easy to get the things they want in our society without putting anything back.

Posted by: Moline | November 30, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Hillary Clinton wisely recommended doing away with NCLB in contrast to Obama who has simply called for improvements, like his predecessor. Which could ultimately be like improving a condemned and collapsing building for the sake of keeping it standing. As far as charter schools go, a number of them have been closed down, at least in the urban areas of Texas, for their substandard performances along with corruption issues. Happy holidays!

Posted by: kat | November 30, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

First of all, Jake, leave the “Obamas sending their kids to elite private school” stuff out. This is a serious issue that can do without the sensationalism.
Huh,
What are these programs that you speak of that you cannot find staffing for? I would imagine it to be some sort of nuclear power research. I can tell you that half the issue with those programs is the application process (not the clearance but the actual lower level application). I can cite my own experiences on this. I have often tried to take part in such programs and am often stopped at the lowest level. First is that you can only get the information if you search online, which is easy enough. But most of the info there might be outdated (mostly). And no amount of emails or phone calls can guarantee a response. The surest way to get involved in such things seem to be if you know someone, if you network and so on. That, as I have written somewhere already, is the true evil in the American education/research/etc system. You can only get through to good positions if you go through a colleague, a professor, a relative. The idea of opportunities being available to everyone is becoming an illusion.
As for school reform, I am very skeptical that teacher reform would equal school reform. Again my first issue is with the recruitment process. Taking for Teach for America as an example, I am rather turned off by their highly “elitist” recruitment process. Although I feel very strongly about school reform, that is one program that I would not apply for. I think its one of the most misguided programs out there, makes me wonder what they are trying to accomplish. They should be recruiting people who are really committed to the issue, instead of targeting those who may be attracted to it because it has become a highly selective program. It should be attracting people who plan to stay teachers for life, not those who plan to do it for 5 years and leave. But thats only a small part of my problem with it.
My biggest issue with school reform is that the reform should be targeted at curriculum, school structure and so on and NOT teachers, not teachers at all. Seriously, it doesn’t take a genius to teach sixth grade, so there really isn’t much point to focusing on teachers there. I strongly believe the best thing to focus on would be the curriculum that these teachers are given! Huh, you mention other countries and their progress on the education front, and I can tell you much of it has to do with their very rigid curriculum. There needs to be a standard TEXTBOOK for every grade. Although some might bulk at the idea of controlling education like that, it really needs to happen. No allowing teachers to hop from one book to another and choosing what they want to teach the kids. School is where students first learn structure and there is no better way to do it that showing them a highly structured curriculum. Once you go to universities/colleges, you get used to working from a single textbook, get assigned homeworks from it and so on. That doesn’t seem to take place much in public schools. The homeworks and pathetic, the books even more so. It could be because the college textbook writing business is a lucrative one; the business maybe not be as lucrative at the lower level, which is why the gov’t should take on that task. And of course longer school days, I am all for longer school days.

Posted by: Question | November 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Thank you for posting this article, Jake. Obama is probably wise to keep his powder dry for fights he actually has a chance of winning. Because the DC schools are not curable short of busting up the district and breaking the teachers’ unions. Until somebody has the balls and the backbone to do that, the DC schools will remain what they are….a pretext for transferring huge sums of tax dollars to education bureaucrats and unionized teachers in return for which they pretend to educate children. Vouchers aren’t a cure, they’re an escape. And Obama ought to at least offer the hope of escape to desperate families who can’t afford to do for their children what he is doing for his.

Posted by: Bridget | November 30, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Do you have any idea at all how many hours teacher work both at school and at home that they don’t get paid for? How they get to spend at least some of their “summer vacations” paying out of their own pockets for and getting hours necessary to maintain their teaching certificates? How often they have to step up to the plate for students because parents either can’t or won’t? The time they spend chaperoning and/or supervising students at games, parties, and other school events?
Are you aware that the average salary is $40,453 for a teacher (clearly an exorbitant amount for someone with a bachelor’s degree, sarcasm intended) and the average salary for a registered nurse is $54,867? Why aren’t you calling for a cut in nurses salaries? They both have at least a 4 year degree and they’re both in the business of saving lives.

Posted by: jan | November 30, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Obama went to elite private schools his entire life, and so have his children. We can expect nothing from Obama as far as education is concerned.

Posted by: tina | November 30, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Teachers can only work with what parents provide. If kids tell their parents that the teacher is being mean to them and then said parent allows them to drop out, as happened in my in-law family, the teacher is not at fault.
If a teacher goes to school and has some nitwit throw a karate kick at her just to show how close he can get without touching her, that is not the teacher’s fault.
If a teacher is told by a child that he/she is teaching that daddy or mommy told him or her that teachers don’t know anything and he/she doesn’t have to do their schoolwork, that is not the teacher’s fault.
If a student says they ran out of paper or pencils and can’t do their school work because daddy or mommy either didn’t or couldn’t buy them for him/her, that is not the teacher’s fault.
I’d really like to know when teacher’s became the public’s favorite whipping post. Personally, you couldn’t pay me enough to put up with some of the spoiled brats I see in the restaurants and malls.

Posted by: jan | November 30, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I taught English in an urban public high school for a couple years, and it was a seven day a week job. I worked as much if not more on the weekends.
Anyway, the biggest areas for improvement, IMHO:
Class size reduction
Too few connections to the real world–have students spend at least one day a week interning/volunteering somewhere.
Improved teacher education–less theory and more time on delivering curriculum in interesting ways

Posted by: Danny | November 30, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Speaking as a nurse…criminy, where can I get that kind of pay?? The one year I made that kind of total was the year I worked an average of 50 hours a week! Vacation? Ya gotta be joking!
But seriously, (not that I’m kidding about the above), you cannot compare teachers and nurses. The jobs are completely different. I admire teachers, I couldn’t ever be one and am the first to admit it, but I don’t know how many teachers could do what I do. And we ARE held to a high level of performance. An accountant screws up, it could result in a fine or whatever for his client. A nurse screws up, it could result in a funeral. I’m not insulting teachers, that’s not where my dissatisfaction with the system lies, because they are often helpless in the face of the factors I mentioned earlier, but it’s past time to start looking at, as it was called by Concerned, “the product.”
You have such a strong Union? Time to start fighting for the kids. Not using them as a shield or weapon, either. You know what the problems are, fix them. And if the Union gets in the way for political reasons, fix them, too.
Just remember, when everything is broken, you need to start from the bottom. The basics. Not yet another fancy build-on that complicates things further. The basics.

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | November 30, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

First, I’m going to take a moment to apologize if I seriously offended anyone. I”m overworked, tired, and rather upset about other things at the moment and got more forceful than I ordinarily would.
Again, teachers can only work with what the parent’s provide.
What I know from personal experience that can and does work. If, as parents, you let the kid know that you’re going to support the teacher in any confrontation and after listening to your child’s side of it stick to supporting the teacher, if you attend parent teacher conferences and occasionally drop by after school and get to know your kid’s teacher/s so that the teacher knows you are seriously interested in your child’s scholastic achievements, if you follow up on homework and take advantage of any extra learning opportunities your child is offered (mine attended school sponsored trips to an autopsy due to an interest in the medical field), current schools can still educate your child adequately. I know its hard when everyone is working full time jobs but it can be done.
Schools and teachers can’t do it without support from home.

Posted by: jan | November 30, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Tell me about performance-based pay. My wife is an art teacher and works her heart out. Exactly how do you measure the size of the smile on a student’s face, or the swelling of their pride in workmanship, as a result of her teachings? There is no top down answer on this one.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | November 30, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Jan, I was going to say that I agreed with everything you said in your previous post, the one with the specific examples — and I do, sorry it’s belated.
I’m not personally offended by your posts. And I understand where you’re coming from. As I said, teachers are blocked at every turn by parents who don’t teach basic decency, by beaurocrats, by pop psych that teaches that correcting a kid will damage him forever, and by pressure from administration who don’t want boats rocked.
Parents ARE responsible for how their kids act, for what they see and learn, and how they treat others. It’s impossible to fight self-centered behavior when the kids learn it from their parents.
It runs deep.

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | November 30, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

I think Obama should put all Marxist teachers in our public schools.All schools should be a big happy Obama land.

Posted by: Karl | November 30, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I tried to give Rhee a break, but Rhee has now lost my respect. The mere mind that thinks it was a tough choice between Obama and McCain over education or any other issues is just plain stupid. I don’t know why DC picked Rhee other than Asian stats in Asian countries. Rhee has no clue about how to relate to our culture or how to educate our children.
McCain ran ads that tried to paint Obama as the bad guy for the public school system teaching children how to defend themselves against predators. What say Rhee on *that issue? All Rhee knows is how to count money. Counting money is not the basis of an American culture.

Posted by: Common Sense | November 30, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

WestCoastMessenger,
I dislike you (based on your comments) immensely, but I appreciate that your wife teaches art. My art teacher was a bit of a snob and insisted that all students buy [insert designer brand] art supplies. I couldn’t afford them at the time, but learnt the lessons.
Finished with honors from the snobby artsy teacher, too. In short, most people just *lurve to be creative and it is the epitome of *freedom. The arts should always be included in learning environments. Learning to *express is probably the the single-most important lesson we learn in school. Learning to *think is one of life’s grandest rewards.
Hats off to your wife. I hope she teaches you something some day! :-)

Posted by: Common Sense | November 30, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Most of the things we call school problems are really societal problems.
Until we address those, we won’t see a big improvement in the schools.
Michelle Obama is the product of a big city public school system. One she and her husband chose not to put their daughters in. What is the difference between then- when the two Robinson children could qualify for Princeton- and now?
I don’t see Linda Darling-Hammond, who believes society owes an educational debt to minorities- as the person to get us back to the place where we once were. Good, safe schools for most urban families.

Posted by: MayBee | November 30, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Jan,
I can only suggest that you ‘volunteer’ as a parent some day. The teacher vs. parent is so old that you’d best come up with something else if you expect children to succeed. The only thing that pitting teacher vs. parent succeeds in is getting not only the children not to respect teachers, but the parents lose respect for them, too.
Teachers do NOT encourage parent participation and neither do the schools. They *do, however, fight parents that want to be involved; teachers have lawyers against parents now.

Posted by: where are the real teachers? | November 30, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Honestly, teachers would not have to be paid based on performance if districts weeded out the bad teachers. Why are terrible teachers being given tenure positions? Seniority should not be a factor in this. As a student, I have been taught by many teachers, and I have seen a lot of great teachers be let go. I have also had to experience some terrible teachers and I have sat in many classes wondering how they still have a job. Most of these new teachers are just in it for the high paid salaries. It is very rare to find a teacher with a PASSION to actually TEACH!

Posted by: winbery6 | November 30, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

My kids are through school, but in comparing their schools with the schools I went too in the sixties. I have to say the schools now seem to care less about the kids. There seems to be conflicts between parents and teachers just as much as conflicts between the kids. The attitudes have changed. Everyone is fighting everyone else and pointing the finger of blame at each other as to why the kids are not doing as well as the parents and teachers think they should be… Personally I think the schools have gotten too big.. There needs to be smaller schools and smaller classes and more caring teachers..The charter schools are this but they cost way too much for the average person to afford. When one has to pay for their children to attend school the poor childern are left out.. I think smaller neighborhood schools with teachers and volunteers from the neighborhoods are what is needed so people can once again have pride in their schools and contribute to it with their time and cooperation.. The city schools now have closed meetings or limit how many can attend (there just isn’t enough room for everyone). The topics are predetermined by the board. Instead of including all parents and everyone’s voice. Is it any wonder there are conflicts?

Posted by: AnnD52 | November 30, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

tina,
please don’t assume going to private schools means one becomes uninterested in improving schools.
Danny,
I realize you have first hand experience as a teacher so I am a bit reluctant to challenge your opinion but i can’t help it: i don’t think teachers need to focus on delivering the curriculum in interesting ways. I worry that students these days may be getting baby-ed a little too much. Nobody in the real world will bother to deliver things to them in interesting ways. So they need to be prepared for the real world. My concern is mostly that the curriculum itself is just not strong enough… I believe schools need to get a standard, RIGID curriculum that teachers absolutely have to stick to. I really think schools have just become too soft even since the time I went to school (which was less than a decade ago).
Yes, I recognize parents have a role in education but I also have the opinion that we should have a curriculum that even orphans can benefit from.

Posted by: Question | November 30, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

One person’s education, or a lack thereof, affects everyone! So your particular antipathy towards minorities provides no positive input to the AMERICAN education system. As I keep on saying, educating 10% of the population does the country no good when 90% is left illiterate. And especially when other countries are focusing on educating ALL their citizens.

Posted by: Question | November 30, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Question,
I like your common sense! 10% when 100% elsewhere. Even an orphan should be able to succeed if teachers put the children first. Yes. I can latch onto those sensible policies.
Thank you!

Posted by: Common Sense | November 30, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Question – Sorry for the delayed response. Nuclear yes. Radar yes. Renewable energy yes. I work in a place where all sort of cutting edge stuff takes place. The average age is around 48 years of age, and most if not all applicants need advanced degrees. It is hard now to find people coming out of school that have US citizenship, advanced science and engineering degrees, and competence. Looking around the national lab where I am at, you realize that so much of the capabilities will be lost when the majority of these folks retire. When I went to graduate school about 70% of the students were foreign nations. I like to think that Americans are not going into engineering and science because the compensation is so much less than law or medicine, but I am afraid that it is because American students lack advanced math skills among other things.

Posted by: Huh | November 30, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Where was michelle Rhee during the eight years of Bush? Where was this kind of article written by this author? P-E Obama will place his children in a place that he and his wife feels is safe and offers educational excellence. They have always attended private schools. The Obama’s have always privately paid for them to do so. P-E Obama wants to greatly improve the quality of our educational system. Want to know how? Stop readind articles by this self-serving clown and log on to P-E Obamas website to get the information for the horse’s mouth. read and think for yourself. Stop relying on the MSM.

Posted by: therealmarie | November 30, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Common Sense,
That’s quite a backhanded compliment. You may have done well in art but you no doubt skipped the classes on diplomacy. In fact, my spouse teaches me something virtually every day. We can only hope that a loved one somewhere teaches you how to tone down your skewed far left views back closer to an achievable reality.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | November 30, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

unless teachers in public schools can be fired if they’re not up to the standard, free from the union, public schools cannot compete with private schools. so, if Obama really is for public school and public educational system, then he has to confront with current teacher’s union, which however backed his election. i would guess that special interest groups influence will dismiss all the promises he made in his campaign.

Posted by: sabniz | November 30, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

The problem with Obama’s position is that many families “opt out” of Public Schools based on affordability…I would not expect the President’s daughters to attend public school but I CAN question an Illinois State Senator who made the private school choice…I understand the concerns and challenges but vouchers should be part of educational choices in urban centers like DC.

Posted by: TruthHurts | November 30, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I am trying to discover what Obama has ever actually done to reform education, in addition to simply talking?
So in 2002 he said he was open-minded to vouchers, but never did anything to promote them in the last six years? Is that change we can believe in?

Posted by: KeepYourHeelsDown | November 30, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Hay Sabniz,
Which standard, yours, mine, or George Bush’s? What does your educational community need? Do you think the feds know, and they know how to reward the right people to get there? What is your standard for artistic achievement? Should we just eliminate art from education? How about if we at least let this rest in the hands of the locals?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | November 30, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

The No Child Left Behind Act was originally conceived by Ted Kennedy as a means to narrow the achievement gap between schools in rich and poor property districts and also between the white and minorities. Unfortunately, proponents of the business model of education, which was spearheaded by individuals without an education background like Ross Perot and William Bennett, became involved in implementing the act. Business and education fundamentals don’t mix well. I tend to think the greatest profiters from NCLB have been testing and educational publishing, certainly not the teachers or students.
George Bush who pushed for the bipartisan act once asked ” Is our children learning?” To which I’d respond as an educator, “Sir, they is learning how to take a test.” I don’t advocate doing away with standardized testing, but I don’t in good conscience recommend educational testing as a tool for evaluating teachers and schools. In principle and in logic, educational testing was never meant to do that, but only to determine individual student progress. I guarantee you that testing is strongly influenced by socioeconomic factors and a very limited range of abilities.
There are other components to learning, like creative thinking and the ability to form an opinion independently. To subject young minds to a barrage of testing requirements runs counter to producing informed citizens capable of of using critical thought. It’s actually not hard to teach testing content and preparation, and consequently, produce good test scores. Anyone can. Educational publishing has certainly capitalized on that.
Accountability procedures for schools beyond test scores need to be developed and big business needs to stand aside.

Posted by: kat | November 30, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

kat – what a great comment. i would love to know how much money has been sent on evaluation for NCLB – that could have been spent on books and decent wages (in the state i live in, some teachers are eligible for welfare, based on their wages) and who made all that money. no child left behind has left a generation of kids fat (no time for recess) medicated (no time for recess or phys ed and plus – more speed means better scores) and clueless (no time for writing, thought, or analysis).
as for sidwell – as someone who comes from a huge family of public-school kids, all with college degrees – i have no problem with the obamas sending their kids to a friend’s school. they deserve safety and privacy. and i can’t imagine why the press corps would complain – most of them went to private prep schools like the barrack academy and ivy league schools themselves. find me a prominent reporter under 50 who went to public school. good luck.

Posted by: Mara | November 30, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

sugar – i couldn’t agree with you more. the media people don’t just send their kids to private prep schools and private colleges – they send them to the right pre-schools so they can get into the right prep schools. look it up folks. they didn’t go to wasilla elementary.

Posted by: Mara | November 30, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Laughing Cynic – People I know from both sides of the political spectrum home school their kids – and they are great. They are bright, inquisitive, kind, confident, and understand things at a basic, common sense level. I think public schools could learn something by looking at the way homeschooled kids are taught.
And I agree about the use of drugs in public school. Use as increased 3000% since 1995. That is not a typo. I wonder what the long term impact is going to be on these kids – who have effectively been taking speed every year for years as their brains develop. I also wonder what they will be able to retain. Instead of paying billions of dollars for experts with PhDs to run evaluations, they could have assembled a forum of mothers and grandmothers and regular teachers – who would have told them the obvious. Kids needs to run. Kids need to play. Kids need to get outside. A lot.

Posted by: Mara | November 30, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

It would have been good to have had a longitudinal study to track the kids who were given psychotropic drugs to better function in schools. I wonder what happened to all those medicated kids. I would be concerned that many of them assumed like the adults that the medication was necessary, and subsequently, had a vulnerability to drug use.

Posted by: kat | December 1, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Mara:
Thank you. Yes, kids need to be kids, to daydream and run and play. And I agree with both you and Kat, I’m afraid for the kids and what these “necessary medications” are doing to their brains. But there won’t be any studies made public, because the ones who run the studies are the ones who are, even now, developing more meds to control normal child behavior. And who are pushing bipolar meds on 2-year-olds. Toddlers are all ABOUT mood swings!
People wonder why I get cranky… and no, I don’t need an antidepressant! LOL

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | December 1, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Some of you are just plain hateful. The person who wrote the last comment was right. Most of you who are suggesting that Obama should send his children to public school are sending your children to private shools. May I remind you that the Obamas went to the best schools and their children were in private shcool before he was nominated so why he has to send them to public school to prove a point to you when most of you do not like him, his name or what he stands for. He did not name himself. .All of a sudden, everyone wants to tell Obama what to do even with his children.
It seen to me that some of you will never be satisfied with the decisions he makes. I think he has a right to drop his middle name or keep it. I dropped my middle name years ago because I did not like it. Obama is not a muslim and according to Mr Powell what if he was?
The man has worn the election with a mandate and you all just cannot stand it. Please if you cannot say anything good about the Guy be honest to yourself and leave him alone. He is a honarable honest and kind person with a lot of regards to people who are suffering and cannot afford to stay in their homes or afford health care. He is our President, that is he will be in 30 days.

Posted by: Alice | December 1, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

I’m a sped teacher. I agree with 90% of your comments (yes, read them all). I do want to clarify one thing. The NEA is the National Education Association, the teachers’ union at the state & national levels. There are many, many of us who despise them. They exist for policy, politics, & lobbying only. But, we need our local unions, the ones at the district levels. Part of our union dues are taken to pay for the NEA. We have ZERO choice about that. We can shape & control what our local unions do & do not do. We have no power with the NEA.

Posted by: korf | December 1, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am

Alice, What are you reading? Virtually everyone here said the Obamas SHOULD be able to send their children to whatever school they want!

Posted by: korf | December 1, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

I’m sure Obama does not want to be seen as breaking the DC teacher’s union but its clear that DC schools are pretty bad. Rhee needs the ability to fire underperforming teachers and reward good teachers with great salaries. The union should have been finding ways to improve their own schools before Rhee came to town. Now it’s too late

Posted by: Bob | December 1, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

I don’t blame Obama for sending his kids to a good private school. We all want the best for our children. Recognizing that government cannot always do the job properly, Obama has turned to the private sector to educate his children.
His desire to keep other children in failed public schools smacks of elitism however. Evidently Obama has learned well from his friend Ted Kennedy. Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others.
Obama didn’t kill our education system, neither did Bush or Clinton. It’s a societal problem extending from the local levels to national. Obama can’t fix the problem but he can make private schools more accessible to others.

Posted by: Oonogil | December 1, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

BO has endorsed publicly bill ayers’ book and taken his children to a black liberation theology church. Both examples show that BO is more than willing to expose children to messages of HATE and anti-American sentiment. Hopefully America will come to realize that they just elected rev wright with more moderate rhetoric.
Also, both his kids attend an $18,000 yr private school, but hey, he’s just your avg guy, right?

Posted by: liberalshateAmerica | December 1, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

If BO can afford to send his kids to an $18,000 a year private school and I can’t, shouldn’t the government make it more fair by paying for my kid’s tuition? Shouldn’t we spread the wealth around for tuition?

Posted by: liberalshateAmerica | December 1, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I suppose if the schools fill the positions at school with more teachers having master’s degree,they will make a huge difference.

Posted by: 상율 한 | December 1, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Alice, take a deep breath! As korf said, this particular thread seems in SUPPORT of his right to educate his kids as he sees proper. And I’m probably one of the few, if not the only, with a child in “private” (home) school. I don’t support him as PE, but I will publicly defend his right to made this decision. I just want the same right he has.
And the middle-name article is dattaway.
Goodness, chill! Go find the “yous” who “are hateful” and the “most of you” threads about education, let us know where they are, and we can go set ‘em straight “as one” on THIS topic at least! And you should have Obama skate on over here for some imspiration on fixing the public schools, there are a lot of good views here.
… that doesn’t mean I’m coming over to his side, mind you…

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | December 1, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

One person’s education, or a lack thereof, affects everyone! So your particular antipathy towards minorities provides no positive input to the AMERICAN education system. As I keep on saying, educating 10% of the population does the country no good when 90% is left illiterate. And especially when other countries are focusing on educating ALL their citizens.
—————————————
Question ,
The very first thing that everyone has to come to grips with is very simple. Despite the concept, which was admirable, it is impossible to “Leave No Child Behind”. Completely & totally IMPOSSIBLE!
The reasons are many and varied, but the fact remains – We cannot educate every single child in this country. We can make the most reasonable attempt, but we must accept that we are destroying the system in order to reach those we cant reach.
The only real solution is to teach the material at each grade level that needs to be taught. No IEPs, No special tests or varying levels of homework. Each & every student must be expected to perform to a required level before advancing to the next grade! If they can’t do that, they stay back. Simply passing them thru the system is where this mess starts.
Teaching to the lowest common denominator is killing education in this country! It has been a failed social experiment for many, many years. It is time to return to the traditional teaching that made our public education system the best in the world.
That means accepting the fact, even though no one likes it, that some kids will dropout at some point, or their needs are to special to be met by the public system.
I have done my share of substitute teaching over the years. I have seen with my own eyes the complete futility of having a mentally handicapped kid in a regular classroom. I have watched clidren like this be handheld thru their day by an aide. These kids have no clue about the material being presented in the class, and are often the object of ridicule by their classmates. I am not saying that we do not educate them, but it is obvious to anyone who has been in a public school, that the environment there is NOT what these kids need to reach their maximum potential. The need to be in a school with properly trained people who have the time and the teaching techniques to really help these kids.
As far as the so-called special education kids go, its time to recognize that modifying their education so they can do 25% or 50% of the work expected of regular students has failed miserably too. This was one of the truly dumbest ideas of all time. Give a kid and “A” for doing “D” level work, because that just all they can do. Then they get through the system, with “great” grades, but cannot even handle the most basic of minimum wage jobs. Yes, this is an idea we should just keep pushing!!!
Over 30 yrs ago, these kids might have gotten out with “C” grades, but it was true “C” level. Now maybe they could do better, maybe not, but there was not artificial inflation of their grade right from the start. Many would then go on to get a job in the local economy, or maybe go to a trade school. There was a good chance of them succeeding because they did understand the process of learning. They were not “artificially” told in 2nd and 3rd grade that because it was hard, they only needed to do 5 homework problems instead of the 10 the rest of the class was doing. There is nothing wrong with having them do 10, and getting 5 wrong. At some point, we ALL make mistakes and need to learn how to work through them and correct them.
As a youth sports coach, the strangest thing about all this is I would see 9-yr olds playing competitive athletics such as Little League and Youth Football and guess what….the kids with less skills do not get 5 or 6 strikes. They have to play and measure their successes and failures just as every player does. For many today though, this is the first place where they are introduced to real failure.
It is time to stop worrying about the psycho-babble we have been hearing for all these years about failure in the early grades crushing kids egos & self-esteem. Failure is a natural part of the learning process – It seems our esteemed high level educators have lost sight of this.

Posted by: Mike_C | December 1, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Mike_C
Liberals are so obsessed with making this country “fair” for everyone that reason and logic left their brains a long time ago. When I went to school, kids who didn’t do their homework (or often even attempt it) were called out, and the ones who completed/attempted it were rewarded. Now some schools are no longer allowed to give homework because it might not be fair for all kids to complete it outside of school.
Liberals have traded in capitalism/ self-reliance for socialism and a “nanny gov’t” state.

Posted by: liberalshateAmerica | December 1, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Paying teachers more will not produce better teachers. Teachers who perform their job well should be rewarded by being allowed to keep their jobs. Teachers who aren’t performing need to yield their responsibilities to those who are willing and capable of performing. The NEA is a stumbling block to better education. Teachers like everyone else should have to compete for pay and benefits, even their jobs. The approach of “pay me more and I’ll do more” has never worked. Right thinking on the part of an employee is “I’ll do more so I’ll be considered for more pay and benefits.”

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 1, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I suppose if the schools fill the positions at school with more teachers having master’s degree,they will make a huge difference.
————————————–
NOPE! That will make ZERO difference. Agreat many of them already have a Masters. Virtually everywhere, teachers are required to take a number of courses over a specific time period.
The number of classes & the time frame vary. Also, getting that Masters is also a way to improve their pay!
Having or not having a Masters Degree has absolutely nothing to do with the issues that are destroying the public school system.

Posted by: Mike_C | December 1, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I attended public schools in 3 states and none impressed me. I fought public schools while my daughter was young. I’ve seen the good, the bad and the ugly.
- There are a lot of good teachers, and some bad ones. Good administrators are as common as honest politicians.
- Football is higher priority than chemistry. A sports program for a few is funded better than academics for many
- No effort is made for vocational training. Why can’t a kid come out of highschool as a certified welder or licenced electrician and ready to go to work?
- Bi-lingual “education” drains funds that could be used for actual education.
- Parents care more about their own entertainment than about their kid’s education.
Lord God Obama can’t fix our education system because the problem goes much deeper than that. We will have to change society and society isn’t willing to change.

Posted by: Oonogil | December 1, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

liberalshateAmerica,
Very True! My wife & I decided to put our son in a local private catholic HS. It was a huge strain on our finances, but now he is in college studying to be an engineer and is a Dean’s List student. It was worth every penny.
What most people dont realize about the private high schools is they have teachers who actually want to be there and are really excited about having students who want to learn. Unlike most pblic schools where it is still “uncool” to be smart, higher end students thrive in these environments.
Also, the schools do NOT have to deal with special education or other concerns that the public schools do. It is a real shame that there are not more programs around for the upper level kids. There are literally hundreds of programs for those kids who are less advanced or less fortunate in their family situations.

Posted by: Mike_C | December 1, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Education key to economic survival.
Finland has often been hailed as having one of the most successful education systems. But what drives its high level of achievement? And what makes it different?
This places greater responsibility on families – and Ms Haatainen says that an important ingredient in Finland’s high achievement in reading and writing is a strong culture of reading in the home.
Parents nurture a love of reading among children and this is supported by a network of public libraries, says the minister.
In the last international education league tables, produced by the OECD, Finland’s 15 year olds were judged to have the highest standards of literacy in the world.
Ms Haatainen also says that the country has made a conscious effort to have highly-qualified teachers throughout the school system.

Posted by: 상율 한 | December 1, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

“This places greater responsibility on families – and Ms Haatainen says that an important ingredient in Finland’s high achievement in reading and writing is a strong culture of reading in the home.
Parents nurture a love of reading among children and this is supported by a network of public libraries, says the minister.”
———————————–
Contrast that with families here who sream discrimination if there local school disctrict does not give in to their every whim.
I completely agree that early reading & full support at home is critical to giving your child his/her best chances to be successful academically.
One has to remember that back when I was very young (Early 1960′s) the vast majority of mothers were stay home moms! Finding that time now in today’s society is very difficult for many families. You have to realize that even in good homes, if both parents are working, kids are being raised in day care. By the time everyone gets home, has a meal, there is very little quality time for the type of reading and parental guidance that is needed for this to work.

Posted by: Mike_C | December 1, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Posted by: Oonogil
- Football is higher priority than chemistry.
———————————-
The reason football gains greater recognition, and is often a priority, is simple: CASH.
Football (especially a school with a winning team) will generate the most revunue through concessions, fundraisers, and selling team merchandise that is often used for such things as school lunches, school events, field trips, etc. Furthermore, football can also offset other expenditures not covered by the district budget, like, extra microscopes for the chemistry lab.

Posted by: Kathy, 1982 Seneca Vally HS | December 1, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

liberalshateAmerica
as a Teacher, I, can say confidently:
you don’t have a clue !

Posted by: Blue | December 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Entry level teachers make $23K in my district. I’ve been teaching science for over twenty years and make less than $40K. I have also, in those twenty years, worked nights cleaning a daycare center and my current part-time job is a night class at a nearby public baccalaureate college. (As I point out to students: honest work done well is nothing to be ashamed about). I have raised a son alone and I sent him to public schools and a state university. I will be debt free in 5 years.
My high school classes are all inclusive, so I have learning disabled, physically handicapped, emotionally disturbed students, gifted and talented and regular students. Want to hand out scapels and dissect? How about a burn lab in chemistry?
Here, entry year teachers are paired with highly qualified teachers. Teachers that are struggling are put on plans of improvement. They can be denied tenure. Administrators can also be placed on plans for improvement. They usually get promoted or asked to leave.
Union? I’ve been on the negotiation team and helped write the master contract for our district to insure equitable treatment for all teachers. I’ve been on the professional rights committee and faced down administrators on behalf of faculty members being unfairly targeted and harassed.
Teachers from my state are actively recruited because of the teacher-education programs. Most leave the state because of financial considerations: they can make more money.
Why don’t I leave? My parents are in their 80′s and 90′s, and I need to be here.
What would I change? NCLB requirements. Unfunded mandates (both federal and state). Society’s perception of teaching: those who can, do. Those who can do MORE, teach.

Posted by: kpr | December 1, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

“My high school classes are all inclusive, so I have learning disabled, physically handicapped, emotionally disturbed students, gifted and talented and regular students. Want to hand out scapels and dissect? How about a burn lab in chemistry?”
You make the comment, but do not elaborate. What fun expereinces have you had giving a scapel to an emotionally challenged kid? Have you had a kid whose fundamental level is that of 3rd grader taking your science class? If so, did you alter his work load and also how he was graded?
Inthose classes were you had kids who dispurted the class on a consistent basis, how often were they removed from the class, allowed to return only to repeat the offense? Do you honestly feel that upper 1/2 of your students today are getting the same level of attention as they did when you were a student ?

Posted by: Mike_C | December 1, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Mike_C
Lowest reading comprehension in class was 2nd grade, 3rd month. I had to get elementary school level science books and pull out information on the topics being covered in class as much as possible. I had to make tests that covered the elementary texts on that level. Poor kid still couldn’t pass. Currently I have 3 students with limited reading comprehension; they have to come in during the midday study hall and listen to the book on computer. Tests have to be read aloud. IEP requires extra time for assignments. Tests have to be multiple choice with limited responses (2 or 3 choises). Several years ago an emotionally disturbed teenager in my class (no aide) did learn to handle a scalpel. Two weeks later he fatally stabbed his adoptive father 23 times. I have to limit burn labs because of the in-class danger.
While special ed (learning disabilities classes) are limited by law to 10 students, I have had as many as 11 in one class, with 12 other students. The admin says it’s “because you’re so good with them”.
The federal government allows pull-out instruction in math,English, and social studies (because of the amount of reading). Science, although a core subject with specialized vocabulary and math, doesn’t meet requirements for pull-out classes. Go figure.

Posted by: kpr | December 1, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I still don’t get how Linda Darling Hammond got this weird reputation as being a supporter of the Status Quo in education. She’s opposed Teach for American on the data that most of those very talented folks are not given enough training to do a good job and most of them (about 1/2) leave after a few years–whereas people who get the training they need to be good teachers are apt to stay in it. We need to give up this idea that good teachers are “born” not made. If you want to be a good teacher you need to know things about child development, research on how people learn and how the brain works and how to most effectively teach the subjects that you know. Why is that hard for us to accept. Would you want to go to an untrained doctor or lawyer why do we think teachers should just be pulled in off the street? When Darling Hammond was in New York she helped get CONCESSIONS from the teachers union to allow for more innovation, better use of teachers professional time and more flexible means for assessment and evaluation. Folks who don’t see her as a radical, haven’t followed her career. She’s JUST the right person for this job!!

Posted by: sdleon | December 1, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.