By Dotcomabc

Nov 8, 2008 10:41am

Palin on McCain Aides Saying She Didn’t Know Africa Is a Continent: ‘Those Guys Are Jerks’

Meanwhile, back in Alaska…

Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska, returned to the 49th state and denied reports that during debate prep she didn’t know which countries were part of NAFTA and seemed unaware that Africa is a continent, not a country, as Fox News’s Carl Cameron reported.

Newsweek also adds that the shopping spending spree is even more troubling than originally reported.

An angry aide characterized the Palins as "Wasilla hillbillies looting Neiman Marcus from coast to coast."

"If there are allegations based on questions or comments I made in debate prep about NAFTA, about the continent versus the country when we talk about Africa there, then those were taken out of context," she said of aides spreading that story.

"And that’s cruel, it’s mean-spirited, it’s immature, it’s unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away with it taking things out of context, then tried to spread something on national news. It’s not fair, it’s not right."

– jpt

UPDATE: Steve Biegun, the former Bush National Security Council aid who worked with Palin on debate prep, defends her to the National Review and insists the NAFTA/Africa accusation is either a twisting of her words or a misunderstanding. And Jonathan Martin, too, gives this tale and Palin another look at Politico.

User Comments

Why doesn’t McCain come to her defense? Put out some sort of statement?

Posted by: cincyr | November 8, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

It’s a painful experience to listen to Palin. Maybe in four more years she’ll be speaking more coherently. I’m hopeful she’ll be a GOP presidential nominee in 2012.

Posted by: Kat | November 8, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Look, it is obvious that those folks making the claims, true or not, will never work a political campaign again if they come forward. That is why Palin is and her folks are acting so brave calling these people. Palin comes the perspective that she does no wrong the same perspective that GWB comes from. One thing I think is certain from this campaign….she is a neophyte and fraud and certainly acts the diva..

Posted by: indy_voter | November 8, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

no concerned in ohio,
mccain needs to come forward and say something.

Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 8, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

They’re cannibalizing each other, showing some of the true colors of the negativity that was inherent to the McCain campaign.
That said, Palin is what cost McCain the election, and to hear Republicans pronounce her the future of the party makes me giddy. If Sarah Palin’s ignorance and divisiveness are the future of Republican politics, I can look forward to many, many years of centrist Democratic control.

Posted by: james432 | November 8, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Wow – It’s inconceivable to me the irony of Gov Palin complaining about twisting of words and taking comments out of context!! Isn’t that what she staked her reputation on during the campaign at each stump speech and on national news? She had to take to prefacing each of her campaign speeches by saying what she was doing wasn’t mean-spirited or unprofessional as was being reported against her. Talk about an immature version of “Don’t do what I do, do what I say”. Isn’t this just the exact whining that she denigrated Hillary Clinton for – stating that it accomplished nothing and diminished the female politician in the process? What a difference an election makes!

Posted by: winter99 | November 8, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

These details, while compelling in a salacious way, are lame. The responsibility for this lies with McCain’s camp. They picked her. They mishandled her. And if they found out she was not up to snuff, that is their responsibility. She sounds immature. But the buck stops with McCain’s campaign.
The people making these claims can never come forward now. It just needs to die. All the people who want to pick these bones will be more than satisfied snarking over every move Obama will make in the coming months and years.
I’m no fan of hers, but I wish everyone would just GROW UP and drop it.
Republicans, for the sake of the two-party system, get your house in order. We need a checks and balance system and many voices in our government. I am a Democrat, but I really want to see the Republicans find their identity again. One-sided debates are dangerous.
Forget Palin and the finger-pointing and get down to business. We need a strong, centered two-party system for this democracy to work. We all seem to be acting like a bunch of b*tchy sorority girls.

Posted by: Paltickin | November 8, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

gee, they’re attacking eachother and nobody wants to take any responsibility for screwing up. How very very republican and how very very Fox news to jump on doing it first.

Posted by: frank | November 8, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

But it doesn’t make sense why the McCain camp leaked all this damaging stuff about Palin. Because ultimately, it speaks worse for them than her that she was chosen for the position in the first place. It’s also peculiar that FOX would be chosen to disseminate the leaks. The underlying agenda is about as incoherent as Palin defending herself.

Posted by: kat | November 8, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I’m also hopeful be the 2012 GOP nominee. Another Obama landslide, only bigger.

Posted by: dem in chicago | November 8, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I agree that the people making these claims should come forward.
However, at :58 in the above video, Palin utters the very odd phrase “the continent vs. the country when we talk about Africa there.”
What did she mean by “the continent vs. the country”?
I think if she wanted to demonstrate she knew what she was talking about she should have said the “continent vs. the countries of Africa.”
And it also struck me as amusing for her to criticize people for being “unprofessional” and then call them “jerks.”

Posted by: Danny | November 8, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

There are people from the campaign staff saying these accusations about Gov Palin are not true, ao therfore this all boils down to a “she said/she didn’t say” thing. And the media coverage this is getting would make one think McCain-Palin had won.
I’d rather we focus on the what is unquestionably said by the ticket that will be assuming power in less than three months. Obama already started giving us documanted on tape material going back to the primaries (ex: claiming there are 57 states). Then there was that bonehead attempt at humor, yesterday, poking fun at Nancy Reagan.
Bottomline: if we’re going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt, even when it is documanted he really did say something stupid, then we should do the same for Gov. Palin, especially when the accusations about her are just hearsay.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 8, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

She’s not even getting what she deserves! calling Obama all the names, at the elections.
Grow up !

Posted by: Justice | November 8, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Well, Sarah Palin’s tirade only shows that she is indeed a nitwit. How can she be taken out of context? Perhaps, she did not give a direct answer to a direct question at that time because she almost always gives vague answers to questions! There had been questions during the debate which she did not give an answer to as she instead kept rattling about other things!

Posted by: susie | November 8, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Considering Palin couldn’t name a single newspaper, I’d have to guess that she didn’t know Africa is a continent.

Posted by: Gus | November 8, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Palin just wasn’t qualified and McCain realized it “after” the selection. The news only puts out a portion and a lot of the problems between them will not come out (as is proper). She’s history, and not worth the time. We’re moving forward now. Much bigger tasks at hand.

Posted by: MARKMYWORD | November 8, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

It is SOOO insulting to women that they picked such a women because of her looks. The whole Palin picks was SOOOOO SEXIST and i’m SO HAPPY that thye LOST the women’s vote EN MASSE for this VERY sexist pick. . shocking!!!1 McCain KNEW THAT or SHOULD have known that! That was HIS responsibility! My God, republicans really ARE the most disgusting group of people. WHY DID YOU PICK HER???? and WHY WERE YOU LYING TO US IN THE FIRST PLACE TRYING TO TELL US SHE WASN’T WHEN YOU KNEW SHE WAS DUMB YOURSELVES!

Posted by: mary in the heartland | November 8, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

” I’m hopeful she’ll be a GOP presidential nominee in 2012.”…are you freakn kidding me??????? WHY?? WHY? WHY? do you people LOVE stupid people???? LOOK at what liking stupid people has done to this country! Do you realize we have a 20 year high of unemployment and the layoffs that will result from the crash have NOT EVEN STARTED!!! we are heading for a depression!!! 8 years ago our economy wa s booming and thegovernment had a surplus. that is asotnishing at how badly Bush killed thiscountry. really. It isshocking, as if he was actually TRYING, to kill this countrry as fast and as badly as he did. And here you want a journalism major flunk out for the next try?????? Unbelievable.

Posted by: matt | November 8, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I’ll be expecting a tell-all book from Nicole Wallace sometime next year unless she really believes Palin as a chance to win in 2012.

Posted by: cincyr | November 8, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! Palin says- ” that’s cruel, it’s mean-spirited, it’s immature, it’s unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away with it taking things out of context, then tried to spread something on national news. It’s not fair, it’s not right.”
Well, I have to say to Ms. Palin, how does it feel to have the shoe on the other foot??? You disparaged and denigrated President elect Obama CONSTANTLY on the campaign trail just to win votes. Your claims were based on innuendo and slander and you deliberately stirred up anger and hate in your slavish masses against him. That was NOT Christian behavior and you are getting a taste of your own medicine now. Can you say KARMA?

Posted by: TRUTH | November 8, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Palin better watch her mouth, she’s name calling the people she needs for support when she runs again.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Live by the sword, die by the sword. Maybe you should have been more careful who you were ‘palling around with”, Sarah. I got some news for ya, YOU were a jerk.

Posted by: frank | November 8, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

“taking things out of context, then tried to spread something on national news. It’s not fair, it’s not right.”
it was fair enough when YOU were doing it every day.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Sarah Palin should reflect back to the things she said against Obama while on the campaign trail. Back then, she had no qualms accusing Obama of palling around with terrorists without even considering that Obama was still a young boy when Ayers committed the despicable act. Ayers was no longer a terrorist but a respected educator when Obama met him. Besides, how could she have accused Obama that when she wasn’t even sure how many times Obama and Ayer’s path crossed in Chicago. The two may have taught in the same university, but that does not prove that they are buddies!

Posted by: susie | November 8, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Well, I have no doubt that what they say about Palin is true. I mean, come on, claims dinosaurs and humans co-existed, can’t name a single news source, doesn’t get that she’s being pranked on the phone (by those Canadian comedians), doesn’t know what causes global warming, etc. And 62% of Republicans polled want this woman to run again. Now that’s scary.

Posted by: ziadora | November 8, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

No offence but Gov. Palin was and is associated with these very same people in the Republican party. They are cohorts. If Gov. Palin intends to run in 2012, she is going to need their help. I’m sure they are quite inclined to assist her now that she has called them cowards.

Posted by: Carlos | November 8, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Obama’s 57 state slip was just a word choice error. He probably meant to say “contests”, since there was Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc…, during the primaries. And everyone makes a joke that unintentionally offends.
Palin’s mistakes, however, have so far tended to show she really doesn’t know what she’s talking about. For example, she couldn’t recall significant Supreme Court cases with Katie Couric, she couldn’t discuss the Bush doctrine with Charlie Gibson, and she completely changed the subject several times during the debate moderated by Gwen Ifill. To name a few instances.
Palin also never once stood before a press conference as VP nominee.
I hope something like this never happens again.

Posted by: Danny | November 8, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Karma is A Bi– Aint it Palin? all that hate and lies you spewed about Obama and Biden, What goes around comes around!!Couldnt happen to a better Person and Palin we are all PRO AMERICANS!

Posted by: Angie | November 8, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

The liberal press thinks Palin is a threat in 2012 and so they want to bury her now.
The TV media needs to fill air time and they don’t want to criticize the One, so they go after the ones that didn’t win.
It is silly and a waste of liberal press time.
Has the VP pick on the losing Presidential ticket ever gone further in national politics?
Here are some of them:
John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, Jack Kemp, Dan Quayle, Lloyd Bentsen, Geraldine Ferraro, Sargent Shriver, Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr., Ed Muskie.
Once their side lost did we ever see any of the losing VPs become the party choice to run for President?
Not since 1932 (FDR) has the #2 on the #2 Presidetnial ticket ever gone on to be the party’s nominee. It does not happen.
Palin is in the same category – losing VP candidate on a losing Presidential ticket.
It is doubtful we will ever see Palin again on the national stage…except at some GOP fundraisers.

Posted by: Wilson James | November 8, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

susie:
your comments are on the mark!!! thank you….
she’s getting back what she gave out….junk!

Posted by: shalom | November 8, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

She makes comments about her foreign policy with Russia’s good due to she can see them; not knowing who was in NAFTA (psst-yo Palin-Canada, US, Mexico), acting not knowing what the Bush Doctrine was. She’s upset her chances on the White House are nil.

Posted by: scott mccowan | November 8, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

the chickens have come home to roost….
In other words: what goes around, comes around…..
Be not deceived, God is not mocked: whatsoever one sows, that shall one reaps….Bible

Posted by: shalom | November 8, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Everyone knew she was a GIMMICK, including McCain. His roll of the dice included considering the utter stupidity of the Repugnican base. That too, is known by everyone as well.
Palin in 2012? YES, PLEASE!
ANOTHER LANDSLIDE………
POTUS OBAMA – Real Leadership

Posted by: Denmark Vessey | November 8, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Palin didn’t blink.

Posted by: cincyr | November 8, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Karma is a b****! What Ms. Palin fails to recognize is that the reason she is receiving so much heat about this issue is due to her own incendiary vitriol. Although she was “hired” to be the “pitball,” she really took to her role with such zeal that it became scary! Little does she realize or is willing to admit are her own achilles heels. This woman is ambitious to a fault. It is clear she is only willing to learn enough to fight anyone standing in her way of achievement. I found it laughable that after Mr. Obama’s victory, she immediately began positioning herself as part of his team. She totally disregarded that, as short as 48 hours earlier, she was calling him everything except a child of God with every pore of her body! Also, that her staff (probably through her instruction) were floating a Sarah Palin White House run in 2012. I guess she concluded that the old war horse Mr. McCain was dead even before he was! I do applaud her attitude of; “If you don’t believe in yourself, how can you expect anyone else too.” Also, I do agree with her about her critics being cowards (THIS GIRL CAN FIGHT Y’ALL! She is callin’ them out!) after all, the bottom line is, that it was not she who made the call to be on the ticket. Ms. Palin is entertaining and can move a crowd but herein lies her problem. An entertainer is not necessarily a good governor/leader–especially for the position of Vice President and the real possibility of President. She is WOEFULLY incompetent and there is no thirst to learn or educate herself. Even if you forgive some of her missteps, there were blunders which were totally inexcusable i.e. the Gibson,Couric interviews, and my personal favorite, the prank call: (Fake Sarkozy) Governor, I just loved your biography Nailin’ Pailin (porn movie if you do not know) (Ms. Palin): Why thank you Nicholas….. With such blunders it amazes me how those who support her felt /feel her capable of being Vice President or President of the United States.

Posted by: FS | November 8, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Palin you get everything you deserve KARMA! what Goes around Comes around you my friend did nothing but try to divide this country and instill fear, Lying and Slandering Obama, This stuff being said about you hurts doesnt it How does it feel couldnt happen to a better person! Thank god your back in Alaska STAY THERE!

Posted by: Angie | November 8, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

“If Gov. Palin intends to run in 2012, she is going to need their help.”
Actually, no. Those people just lost a major campaign. They are out of jobs and out of the business. Palin, on the other hand, proved she is a draw and now has the attention of the conservative feminist movement. She will do well. Her critics just joined the velociraptors on the extinction list.
The reason these distractions are getting press is to give Obama time to get on his feet. He knew he could win but he doesn’t have a solid plan for what to do next. That means they need something or someone else to absorb the enormous amount of negative energy they generated starting in the primaries and they believe Palin is the best card to discard. They can’t attack Clinton because they are absolutely beholden to the Clinton machine and they can’t attack McCain because of his considerable power in the Senate.
So they are going after Palin. And that will backfire big time.

Posted by: len | November 8, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Sarah Palin consistently displays a reckless temperament in the face of adversity, just as McCain did. Americans truly dodged a deadly bullet on this election. I guess hind-sight must truly be 20-20 in that the voters of the USA now clearly know a swindler when they see one.

Posted by: The Left is Right | November 8, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

It is not the so called Liberal press trying to destroy her, Her own people are telling the Press these things about her. I bet Mccain feels Embaressed so stop blaming the Press when its people in her Campaign that is reporting it

Posted by: Angie | November 8, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

The Republican Party has no one to blame but themselves; they have lost touch with working people and conservative values a long time ago. Palin deserves some credit but they should be pointing a finger at themselves! At the end of eight years we have had out of control spending, more big government, corruption even the Democrats couldn’t match, poking their nose into matters that should be resolved on a state level, handing billions of tax payer dollars over to the Pharmaceutical Ind. by not negotiating Medicare drugs, wanting to tax our income we pay for health insurance, pandering to the extreme right religious groups for more laws and I could go on and on. Conservative values? Those issues are why the republicans are in the shape they are!

Posted by: rickyt1234 | November 8, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

In modern times, NO losing VP candidate has ever come back to become the future Presidential nominee for either the Democratic or Republican parties.
It never happens.
It won’t happen with Palin, either.
Move on people.
There are more important things than discussing old political news; such as the breed of Obama’s new dog and the dog’s name.

Posted by: Thelma | November 8, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Matt – Sometimes I’m too subtle. Her running for the GOP presidential candidate in 2012 would hand over a victory to the Democrats. I guess I should have ended my post with a wink.

Posted by: kat | November 8, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Palin you are a hypocrite. In your rallies you stirred up the people into a frenzy of hate with your attacks on Obama’s character. Yea, you demonstrated a great deal of no class. As Eva Peron said, “Don’t cry for me Argentina.” Suck it up and move on. Next time don’t except a position when you know you are not qualified. It’s called honesty. You set yourself up to fail because you were not ready to be the VP for the Republican Party. It’s great to have goals but being to ambitious especially when your are not prepared for a challenge is just not smart. And one other thing to redeem yourself you should apologies to Obama for the poison that came out of your mouth. Senator Byrd was once in the KKK he found GOD and changed. Go and search for the same GOD that Senator Byrd discovered I think you will realize the GOD that you have been following is a false and twisted version of Christian a GOD.

Posted by: cony007 | November 8, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Obama’s 57 state slip was just a word choice error. He probably meant to say “contests”, since there was Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, etc…, during the primaries.
Posted by: Danny | Nov 8, 2008 11:38:16 AM
“Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii.” – Senator Barack Obama, May 9, 2008
Not to parse this quote too closely, but does this then mean Alaska and Hawaii is a single state? (Our own Trinidad and Tobago? Woo-hoo!)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 8, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I was pretty neutral about McCain – - it was Palin who scared the living daylights out of me. She was NOT ready to be president. I want a woman in office and I think America is ready for it when the right candidate comes along. She was NOT the right candidate.

Posted by: Amy | November 8, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

She’s done.

Posted by: dan | November 8, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

McCain is trying to distance himself from her and will not come to her defense. She needs to take responsibility for her own actions and lack of knowledge in the meantime she’s keeping herself and the issues in the spotlight which she enjoys.

Posted by: andie | November 8, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“It never happens.”
Didn’t they used to say that about African-American candidates for President?
The times they are a changing. Did you think it was a one election cycle deal?
Palin is not going away. She is a smart fast learner. She can make of her political future what she wants it to be. You can’t stop her.
That scares you witless, so you attack and attack. As you do, she gains momentum.

Posted by: len | November 8, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

I think the media is pulling a little hope-a-dope* act on us. We’re all looking at Gov. Palin while Obama appoints every character from Fanny/Freddy, Goldman Sachs and the Chicago machine he has ever layed eyes upon.
With the coverage Gov Palin is getting, you’d think John McCain had won the election.
( * “hope-a-dope, courtesy of writer, Mark Steyn.)

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 8, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

The Republican Party has no one to blame but themselves; they have lost touch with working people and conservative values a long time ago. Palin deserves some credit but they should be pointing a finger at themselves! At the end of eight years we have had out of control spending, more big government, corruption even the Democrats couldn’t match, poking their nose into matters that should be resolved on a state level, handing billions of tax payer dollars over to the Pharmaceutical Ind. by not negotiating Medicare drugs, wanting to tax our income we pay for health insurance, pandering to the extreme right religious groups for more laws and I could go on and on. Does that sound like conservative values? Those issues are why the republicans are in the shape they are!

Posted by: rickyt1234 | November 8, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

How can $150,000 of clothes an jewlrey be purchased without her being involved with with this decision. She claims she did not force the RNC to buy her the clothes and that these are not her clothes? When purchased by HER, these clothes were tailored to fit her and her family because she went to these fancy stores, and selected and purchased those clothes with an RNC credit card. What is the RNC to do now, give clothes tailored to her and here family to the salvation army. She will offer to buy the clothes from the RNC for a dime on the dollar if she does not walk away with them outright for no real cost to her. Either way, this was a huge waste of “other peoples money”. She may be frugal with her money, but she serves herself big time with other peoples money. The Alaska treasury had just better watch out for her and her relationship with businesses that want to “help Alaska”.

Posted by: steve | November 8, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Would this woman just fade into the snow banks in Alaaska.

Posted by: Jwench | November 8, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

What a hypocrite.. she can run one of the dirtiest campaigns in history, taking ‘words out of context’ and using them to smear to opposition, but once it’s turned around, she cries like a baby.
Good by and good riddance Sarah. Stay up in Alaska and let your own residents rip you apart.
Palin enthusiastically practices socialism, Alaska-style
Someone give Sarah her brain back
A costly personal, vindictive Palin vendetta? You betcha

Posted by: Nancy | November 8, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Len,
Are you laughing at yourself while you were typing that?
Palin getting stronger? Pass what you’re smoking.
The very hand that fed her into believing she could be VP has now opened up and started slapping her.
POTUS OBAMA – Brains in the White House

Posted by: Denmark Vessey | November 8, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Looks like the hired pit bull is getting attacked by the pit bulls she angered. Everybody go home and shut up.

Posted by: SeekTruth | November 8, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

She is a sad case who wants power so bad it hurts…………………

Posted by: indp voter | November 8, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I would love to see all of her educational transcripts. Seems she did not have much education.

Posted by: Tom | November 8, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

I can’t believe you guys! It is obvious that from the start, the McCain camp felt that because she was an outsider, she would never fit into the campaign, because they were all insiders! Therefore, she wasn’t even given a chance to fit in by the Republican party. Palin brought life to the party, but it was her own life in which she had crowds of young people & women three times that of McCain.
These were middleclass people but not Republicans or Democrats so declared. I agree, Sarah didn’t fit into the Republican Party, because they were insiders, so now it is more than evident she is made the scapegoat to bear their lose. This only shows that the Republican party itself, is not willing to accept the responsiblity of their lost. Neither party gets my respect. The only one that can set the record straight as a man, is McCain, and I doubt he will, because it only shows he is a insider too, and not a man to accept responsibility. All this is definitely why we need an outsider in Washington next election, to really clean up our government. Sarah Palin is best never to run on the Republican ticket again for President, but a ticket of her own and give it a name. You wait and see, if she did that, she would capture the hearts of the youth, women, seniors, men, Hispanics, and a lot of Black people, even if Obama runs again.

Posted by: lrc from Arizona | November 8, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

A new poll out yesterday had 65 percent of Republicans wanting Sarah to run in 2012
If you watch the complete video when Obama said 57 states it is obvious he meant to say 47. He was counting out loud, where he was still going and his campaign staff said he could not go to Hawaii, which he did about two months later.

Posted by: Jim | November 8, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

The fact that none of the people making these comments and accusations has come forward leads me to believe that it is all a load of bull and you must be pretty gullible if you believe otherwise. Anyone can make any accusation anonymously. So far, the only persons from the campaign to come forward and speak on camera about the tension/rift have defended Palin. How anyone can believe anonymous sources over those that have actually spoken on camera is beyond me.

Posted by: Liv | November 8, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

I think this treatment is slightly rougher than what she deserves…but just slightly. Who hasnt misspoken under pressure? But then again, this is the same woman who said there were “pro-American” parts of the same state–her knowledge of geography REALLY stinks.

Posted by: Ivy | November 8, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

She can dish it out but she sure can’t take it.
COUNTRY FIRST!
Yeah, right.
LOL

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

If the Republican Party courts her participation in future elections, it is obvious they do not realize why they lost this one. She may ‘energize their base’ but what good does it do to energize a bunch of whackos? The RNC needs to change its foundation which should RIGHT NOW start to exclude vitriol, hate, Hannity, Limbog, deceit, and any Greenspam influence. They need to face the facts, not doctrine, not ideology, not party line. Let the facts run the decisions, not ‘hail Marys.’ Why would anyone want a maverick as a leader anyway?

Posted by: SeekTruth | November 8, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

There is something terribly wrong with the men in both parties bashing this beautiful, intelligent and STRONG woman.
Is this the change American needs? Why has this country elected ANY man who permits the bashing of its women? Obama is disgusting in his shoving Hillary aside and McCain is equally disgusting to use Sarah and then discard her.
Women need to wake up to who is in control of the country and the message these men have sent us.

Posted by: West Michigan | November 8, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Knife fight in the republican camp. I love it !!! What is funny is that this idiot is actually happy with all the media attention she’s getting – not realizing that they’re just trying to get her to say more stupid stuff. Even Fox Noise is in on the act. Please vote YES to keep the Sarah Palin comedy hour on the air.

Posted by: Chandu | November 8, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

A new poll out yesterday had 65 percent of Republicans wanting Sarah to run in 2012
Posted by: Jim | Nov 8, 2008 12:13:37 PM
That would be good news for Obama in 2012 :)

Posted by: Jwench | November 8, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Since the Republicans added at least one new state (remember “Real Virginia”)? Maybe Obama wasn’t speaking out of turn by saying 57 states.

Posted by: fivepin | November 8, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

There is an irony when a nasty pitbull like Palin can’t take the negativity in return. This thin-skinned whiner could have been president in January if McCain dropped dead. It’s amusing how the born-again Jesus X followers are so full of hate spewing nastiness.

Posted by: Jim Macko | November 8, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

When one skims through all of these remarks what comes to mind is what ABC and the MSM have done to create and promote this kind hate.
The Obama people talk about brining the country together, but that isn’t going to be good business for the press.
It’s sad to see how low the news reporting has sunk and what its biased reporting has done to tear at the fabric of America.

Posted by: Barry In Las Vegas | November 8, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

In modern times, NO losing VP candidate has ever come back to become the future Presidential nominee for either the Democratic or Republican parties.
It never happens.
It won’t happen with Palin, either.
Move on people.
There are more important things than discussing old political news; such as the breed of Obama’s new dog and the dog’s name.
Posted by: Thelma | Nov 8, 2008 11:52:59 AM
_______________________________________
Thelma I disagree with you. In 2000 Al Gore won the election and the popular vote. If the counting had continued in Florida and not stopped by the supremely biased supreme court, we would have discovered Al Gore beat bush in Florida and bush stole the election by having the supreme court appoint him president.
Now I digress but how different would our world be today if the American election process had not been destroyed. I guarantee over a million innocent civilians, 4500+ American soldiers, and 6 trillion dollars, would not all be just be memories. I also believe that Al Gore would have listened to the PDB’s and the Twin Towers and the US airlines full of all their precious cargo would be here as well.
Republicans you are to blame for this mess and I hope you never touch the big levers of power again. I will not forget, and I will remind everyone I know what a disaster you have been for this nation. The totality of your destruction by enabling these twisted fascist is mind boggling.

Posted by: SeeingABetterWorld | November 8, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Folks,
Leave her alone,
Medias,
Leave us alone from her.

Posted by: jj | November 8, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

We’re all in trouble when we replace the word “knowledge” with “degree of knowledgeability.” What’s next? A fraction of recollectedness?
It’s what we get for pallin’ around with politicians.
Meanwhile, Sarah, bye-bye for now. We’ll get back to ya.

Posted by: Palins versus Clampetts | November 8, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

R Mutt,
Do you know the difference between the gaffe and ignorance?
That is between Obama’s 57 states comment and Palin’s Courtie interview.

Posted by: jj | November 8, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Wow, the dumbo really thought she had been picked because of her brilliance! Hey, Palin, you were just a prop, it’s time you snap out.

Posted by: John Kovacs | November 8, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

I agree with ‘Seek Truth’ – if Sarah Palin is the kind of person that energizes the Republican base, then the Republicans need to find a new base.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

The fact McCain has not come forward to defend – is telling. Count on Palin to resurface as a former govenor running for President starting 2010 in Iowa. Leaving public office enables Palin to do what she does best – wave – and spew out pre-scripted campaign lines. She will appeal to her base – but will be competing with others who have appeal as well. To win ultimately – she’ll have to appeal to the the center – to be successful there – she’d totally have to re-invent herself.

Posted by: jburke | November 8, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Perhaps the Palin leaks were both the results of divisiveness within the McCain camp and something more systematic. Maybe she was being handicapped for the 2012 run. It’s just a parting conjecture.

Posted by: kat | November 8, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Finally McCain strategist came out last night in FOX NEWS and denied all the rumors about Governor Palin, so Schmidt, they both personally denied. They both are getting the heat and have been called cowards!
I agreed McCain should have come earlier and stop that. They are trying to blame and scapegoat Governor Palin instead of accepting responsibility for their ill advise and campaign management. In all fairness Governor Palin joined the campaign just 9 weeks ago, and bear in mind that McCain lacked his nomination months before Obama did and his campaign strategist did nothing to create a real message for the fall campaign, they had plenty of time to prep and vet the VP candidates in the short list. It’s their fault, they were no match for the well managed Obama’s campaign. As usual the losers without courage are pointing fingers instead of taking responsibility for defeat.
As CNN put it, some of those staffers and strategist will not find job in the near future. Wh will trust them?
Even Campbell Brown from CNN and Oprah mentioned how low the “anonymous” sources can go and how easily they can smear people reputation. As nasty rumors tried to smear Obama about he being a muslim, born in other coutry, don’t know the US has 50 states, etc.
Palin like Obama will probe wrong those cowards and anonymous sources.
Time to move on an support our leaders in the big task of taking this country forward and out of this huge economic chaos.

Posted by: so wrong_ cowards | November 8, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Maybe there is something to this karma business.

Posted by: schedenfruede | November 8, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I think bobby jindal or mitt rummy is far better choice for GOP.
Why bother about this woman?

Posted by: jj | November 8, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Jesus X followers are mostly big hypocrites. Their blind support for Palin and for the hatred she was trying to spread made that very clear. Jesus X followers, do you remember what Jesus’ message was all about? Something about loving others, right?…

Posted by: John Kovacs | November 8, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Sorry not all Americans but the Democrats and the Hollywood league, they are far from being an emancipated society. Nina from Europe

Posted by: Nina | November 8, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

jj: Let me put it this way (it seems my “smartest kid in the class” anlogy offended the ABC moderator):
Even Tiger Woods makes a bad shot every once in a while, but extremely rarely. When he does, he recovers brilliantly. Nobody would say he’s a lousy golfer.
That Obama’s “57 states” slip is ALL YOU’VE GOT TO WORK WITH, after 2 years on the campaign trail (not to mention a LANDSLIDE VICTORY), should tell you that Obama is a pretty good ‘golfer’

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

The democrats and the mainstream media including the Hollywood league are one misogynist folk and far from being emancipated. The decried Palin from the beginning to avoid a woman come to power.

Posted by: Nina | November 8, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Both Parties need serious help. No experience on either side. Lindsay Gramm needs to run in 2012!

Posted by: Mike F | November 8, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Oh my goody. Let’s STOP this bickering and childish nonsense chasing this woman. Sarah Palin was, indeed, not ready to be a VP. With some more experience as Governor, she may…
I think we all need to look at the way America campaigns. It takes too long and for the future consider shortening it.
As for Obama, stop bickering as well because he’s black. He IS the right person for the job, finally someone with BRAINS coming into the White House. Give him some space, and stop judging. If we’re a Nation that says: “In God We Trust”, let’s TRUST in God for having Obama as president, no matter what the skin color. Are there any WHITES out there better than Obama that WANT the job or CAN DO the job? No,
so just be still and let the man run his presidency.
God Bless you all and God Bless the USA.

Posted by: Lilly | November 8, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Wow, lets see how much bashing Obama can take probably not 1/10th the scrutiny Sarah Palin has taken. Lets see the press critique anything he does. They will be banned for life.

Posted by: Tony | November 8, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Barry In Las Vegas, were not ABSOLUTELY offended that this woman was brought forth to the electorate as a contender for one of the most powerful positions in this country? I feel the RNC owes the country an explanation for her selection. Mr. Bush has made his mistakes but I would never call him dumb. Mr. Quayle had his issue but I would never call him dumb. Ms. Palin has demonstrated in numerous incidents her utter lack of knowledge and lack of literacy. What is even more disturbing is that she is unable to recognize this within herself. Is she qualified to be Governor of Alaska? Probably, given its population size but to be Vice President or President of the United States? PLEASE! Keep this woman away from the White House!!! Do not even allow her to take a White House tour! Talk about the story about the “Emperor’s New Clothes” This was a living example!

Posted by: FS | November 8, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

I don’t care at this point if Palin knew Africa was a continent or a country. As low an opinion of her intelligence as I have, even I doubt that Palin doesn’t know Africa is a continent. What I find interesting is her remark that “those guys are jerks.” That is real professional, Palin, really impressive in someone who envisions herself as a leader.

Posted by: jon in maryland | November 8, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Palin is a genius, like me. That’s why I want her for President.

Posted by: Nina from Alabama | November 8, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

She has a lot of nerve, spending two months spreading mean-spirited attacks based on out of context quotes and incomplete information about President-elect Obama, his past, and positions.
Governor Palin, you may want to have someone explain to you the meaning of the phrase: “Live by the sword, die by the sword.”

Posted by: unsympathetic | November 8, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Palin is 44. By 2012 she will be menopausal or post-menopausal. She won’t be able to use her sex-appeal anymore, her winks and flirting. She does not have the kind of face that ages well. That’s all she got.

Posted by: Terry from Alaska | November 8, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Whichever McCain advisers supported the idea of tempoarily suspending the campaign during the onset of the financial crisis is who to blame for McCain’s loss. The tide turned because of that boneheaded move.
Palin energized the base but turned off many independents. I’ll leave it to political scientists to analyze whether if she was a net gain or loss.
As a Republican I am a little tired of Palin. But that could change. If she appoints herself to take over the Stevens’ seat in the Senate (should he win and then have to step down) and does a reasonable job as a US Senator for four years, then a lot of people’s minds may change about her.
Four years in the Senate is a lifetime of experience for a politician. Such we learned in the Presidential election 2008.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 8, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

when they stop talking about you is when you become irelevant …
so far sarah seems to be getting about the same amount of coverage as the president elect, i love it!

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I am wondering if she could bet a 5th grader?????

Posted by: indp voter | November 8, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Right… Palin would only make a fool of herself in the Senate.

Posted by: Terry from Alaska | November 8, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

ATTENTION ABC: Americans have already made their choice and Sarah Palin was obviously not a part of it. Get a clue, her 15 minutes are DONE! My only advice to Palin…READ & UNDERSTAND the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES and actually apply it to your thought process.

Posted by: Real American | November 8, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

“when they stop talking about you is when you become irrelevant ”
If you are irrelevant, people don’t talk about you. But just because people talk about you doesn’t mean you are relevant. Logic 101.

Posted by: Terry from Alaska | November 8, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

I think that ANYBODY running for President or VP should be required to pass tough exams about the content of the Constitution, history, and other topics that are critical for the job. That on top of the debates and everything else.

Posted by: John Kovacs | November 8, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

what a mess the mccain campaign was
can you imagine what shape this country would be in in two years if mccain and palin had won?

Posted by: one planet, one people, please | November 8, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Palin said that she trusts God to do the right thing on election day and he did! I give her credit for that.
I look forward to seeing the next best comic book – one written by MacCain aides with more on the ignoramus. With McCain being quiet about this, he seems to be agreeing with hisaides :-)
We americans feel it is OK to not know anything about the rest of the world because they need us and we do not need them. I guess in Alaska they feel the same way about the remaining 49 states.

Posted by: Peach_Nectar | November 8, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Palin is a sore loser. And so are her supporters.

Posted by: John Kovacs | November 8, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

bad press is better than no press.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Nothing was taken ‘out of context’..she simply didn’t know…..as stated before on this thread….Palin – Read and understand the Constitution – its our Law of the land and our connection to our Fore Fathers….

Posted by: Roc19 | November 8, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Why are the press still following this person – she is not of any consequence any more.

Posted by: Robert | November 8, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

I’ll say one thing for Sarah Palin, she is persistant with her remarks against Obama. Even after it’s over, and she is back in her homeland Alaska, incidently is Alaska a State, or a country? Anyway, every chance she gets to put a dig in on the president elect, she gets one in on him, and she blames her debaters were poor losers. Well, we’ll see how patriotic, and loyal she really is, when she needs something from our new President, and has to ask him for help in some way. She should have been a little more respectful to Obama, while running against him, because you never know who your boss will be next.

Posted by: jms55 | November 8, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Now that Sarah Palin has been tagged and released back into the wilds of Alaska I suggest we watch her migration routes very carefully, hopefully she will stay out of the lower 48. As for her jerk remark I have always been told it takes one to know one.

Posted by: LANNY EDWARDS | November 8, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Dumb broad … what was McCain thinking … probably something that can’t be printed here.

Posted by: Dr. Wayne | November 8, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I agree totally with Palin that her critics are not only jerks & coward but their actions blatantly displayed they
are opportunist trying to get favors & position from Obama.

Posted by: Hector | November 8, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Posted by Kat:
“It’s a painful experience to listen to Palin. Maybe in four more years she’ll be speaking more coherently. I’m hopeful she’ll be a GOP presidential nominee in 2012.”
She would would have to grow a brain first. Not likely to happen in four years. Personally, I hope the GOP does put her forth as a candidate in 2012 – actual candidates for POTUS have to survive real press conferences with real questions about real issues. Which means she would be toast before the first press conference ended. So bring her on, GOP. I would love to know that Obama’s second term is guaranteed. Not to mention the high entertainment factor.
A note of interest: We turned NC blue this year, and a huge reason for that was the Palin pick. Hundreds of people we canvassed (many were registered republicans)told us that the moment McCain picked Palin was the moment he lost their vote and Obama gained their vote.

Posted by: BMS in NC | November 8, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

It’s fun watching the GOP eat their young!

Posted by: Colvin | November 8, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I want an update on the clothing donation after the election. Or isshe returning them to Nieman,Saks?

Posted by: ann from ohio | November 8, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

While I definitely did not support Palin in the election as she was CLEARLY out of her league in understanding issues and answering BASIC questions, I find it VERY hard to believe that an elected official with a college degree would not know Africa is a continent — or that North America consists of the U.S., Mexico, and Canada.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I feel sorry for the Barracuda.

Posted by: What the? | November 8, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

OMG, will wonders never cease? The very fact that FIXED NOISE is saying that their numbers tanked directly after the Couric interview were the most accurate news fact that they have ever pronounced! It’s positively mind-boggling!!!
I don’t care if Palin didn’t want to be prepped for it, because even if she had been, we still would have seen her butcher the English language and we still would have heard the jumbled words she believes construct a concise sentence! It is simply unimaginable to think this woman is as IGNORANT AS SHE IS AND LACKS GENERAL KNOWLEDGE on current or historical events that most high schoolers know. For her to now say the media is lying and the handlers were jerks is just another one of her LIES [she tells them with a straight face and a smile] to cover up the lack of knowledge and help her get to the top of her personal ambitions.
For McCain to try and pass her off as QUALIFIED for VP, let alone POTUS, tells us that ‘winning’ was the only thing that mattered to him and he didn’t care that he lost whatever honor he may have once had. If she was able to help with inciting her supporters to react in a froth of hate, bigotry and racism, then she needs to rethink her attractiveness [rather lack thereof] for even the GOP base because Americans are sick to death with those Rovian methods of campaigning.
Our votes SPOKE LOUDLY AND CLEARLY to get that message across to the GOP. Palin is simply UNQUALIFIED and there is nothing she can do to change that fact. The GOP needs to rethink and rebuild a genuine approach to diversity and conservatism so until they can change their message, they will continue to lose the moderates who left them in droves in this election.

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 8, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

The Republican Party has no one to blame but themselves; they have lost touch with working people and conservative values a long time ago. Palin deserves some credit but they should be pointing a finger at themselves! At the end of eight years we have had out of control spending, more big government, corruption even the Democrats couldn’t match, poking their nose into matters that should be resolved on a state level, handing billions of tax payer dollars over to the Pharmaceutical Ind. by not negotiating Medicare drugs, wanting to tax our income we pay for health insurance, pandering to the extreme right religious groups for more laws and I could go on and on. Does that sound like conservative values? Those issues are why the republicans are in the shape they are!

Posted by: rickyt1234rickyt1234 | November 8, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Lanny easy now easy. But I agree whole heartedly.lol

Posted by: ann from ohio | November 8, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

So… mainstream media is at fault, the democrats are at fault, and now the McCain aides are at fault.
At least those “real Americans” still think she has a shot in 2012.

Posted by: Kris | November 8, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I hope Republicans will not bring this woman again (Palin). Ask yourself what did she help? Totally nothing just to use your money on clothes.
We all learn through mistakes we make. It was not an ideal thing to put Palin on the ticket. She has been a liability instead of an asset.

Posted by: FM | November 8, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

It was obvious to the American people that Palin had many deficiencies. That said, McCain should not have selected her with all her baggage, intellectual mediocrity, ignorant world vision, extreme religious views, ties with secessionist’s organization, unwanted teenage pregnancy…I could go on and on. Clearly she was not vetted in any depth. It badly reflects on her, the Republican Party, and, above all, on McCain who should not have pandered to the religious right like he did.

Posted by: Two-cats | November 8, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

We all occasionally make stupid slips of the tongue and briefly forget something we’ve known forever. Call it a senior-moment, blonde-moment, airhead-moment or whatever, that’s all Sarah Palin is guilty of as far as the Africa gaff – and we have all done it. Too bad she had the unfortunate luck to experience her senior-moment in public – kind of like Dan Quayle mispelling potato as potatoe years back. When I have one of these moments in front of my kids they have a heyday with it and have a great time making fun of me. I guess they must be journalism prodigies. I understand that Obama committed a similar gaff when he referred the USA’s 57 states.

Posted by: genlin | November 8, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

The news media will do what it does best, and that is to build up someone to such high expectations, and then tear them down with every stumble. Sorry Obama but you have been set up to be the fall guy.

Posted by: AJ | November 8, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I swear McCain seemed relieved when he gave his concession speech. It was almost like he was relieved that he and the United States would not be subjected to 4 more years of Palin.

Posted by: RobbieSue | November 8, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

What’s really cool about all this is that the McCain campaign was fully aware of the con that they were trying to pull on the electorate.
What’s even more absurd is the a college educated anybody (unless they bought their diploma at the local Walmart) would not be self aware enough to know they weren’t qualified for the VP slot in the first place. So if she was stoopid enough to think that hse was ready to be VP, then it’s entirely plausible that she didn’t know that Africa was a continent iinstead of a country. If she truly thought that she had more executive esperience than both Obama and Biden then she probably didn’t know who the NAFTA signatories were. And then there’s the one where she thinks she’s and “Energy Expert”!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
She deserves all the dirt flung her direction and more. Now for that McCain idiot…back up the dump truck!

Posted by: DCRealtor | November 8, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Ms. Palin may be able to redeem herself, just a little, if she would just answer these questions instead of accusing others of picking on her.
1. Did you, and your family, shop at high end clothing stores and spend more than $150,000.00 when, in fact, your clothing benefactor had expected maybe $20,000-$25,000.00?
2. Did you know before this campaign that Africa was a continent?
3. Before this campaign, what newspapers did you read?
4. Do you understand that this country believes you were “mean-spirited” during the campaign. We heard you and we believe that you were the most negative of them all and many (most?) of your negative comments were found to be untrue.
5. Do you realize that John McCain was ahead in all of the polls, even for a short time after he chose you, until you became a pitbull – with or without lipstick? Are you willing to, finally, take some responsibility for John McCain NOT being our president-elect?
6. Will you reimburse Alaska for the trips that included your family? You know – the ones that you changed the records on after Mr. McCain asked you to to join him in running this country.
7. You didn’t build the “bridge to nowhere” but, did you keep the money for that bridge in Alaska?
8. Did you really expect to give a consession speech? If so, why?
9. How many items that the RNC paid for did you take home and what dollar amount would that be?
Ms. Palin, just let us hear some truths from you. Maybe then, people would let up on you and, at least, agree that you are only human and you made mistakes.

Posted by: Roxanne | November 8, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I voted for McCain/Palin.
But McCain’s weakness in refusing to deal with thuggish attacks on Governor Palin have reduced him to a guy with a lack of intestinal fortitude. He may have had it once but he has lost it!
I am neither a democrat nor a republican because both parties have demonstrated cannibalization of their own.
Governor Sarah Palin was the only breath of life in the general election!
She is an authentic reformer and may put a new face on the pseudo intellectual and phony elitist republican party. :)
If so, I will take a second look at the GOP!
I watched an almost spooky moment as Obama raised his arm over a mesmerized crowd when he gave his somber speech Tuesday night! The world has seen this before! :(

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The Alaskan grifters are back where they belong. Palin will never recover from this fiasco. Like Nancy Reagan told her a long, long time ago, “Just say NO.”

Posted by: DCRealtor | November 8, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Sarah Palin has an excellent on-screen personality and is entertaining. But she was part of one of the WORST political campaigns in recent memory. John McCain should simply admit that his entire campaign was mismanaged, and stop blaming his failure on Sarah Palin.
The best speech McCain gave all year was his concession speech Tuesday night.
So, for those of us who sort-of reluctantly supported McCain, it’s time to GET OVER IT! 52% is not the predicted landslide, but America has spoken. We WILL become the USSA, like it or not.
We cannot dwell on “what might have been”. The America in which some of us grew up is GONE… forever.
Let’s see what the future brings!

Posted by: Rhys | November 8, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

aware2u – you’re a religious moron duped by a woman that was absolutely the most unqualified person available as a choice for the GOP. She was forced on McCain by the religious right only because she would bring all the church going housewives that think they have a connection with Palin.

Posted by: dan | November 8, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

I hope that reporters will make note and make public the names of all McCain aides. As a social & fiscal conservative, I have no where else to turn, and yet I found myself screaming at the TV. I am convinced that I could have run this campaign better, gotten out the core message more effectively, and encouraged McCain to show the nation why Arizonans love him as their senator. Now, these same aides – that ruined McCain AND Palin’s presentations – are canabilizing the ones who were responsible for their paycheck.
NOTE to all RNC politicians – Find out who these people are – and NEVER hire them for anything. I know I would not hire one to walk my dog.

Posted by: Caral from SoCal | November 8, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

jms55: I would hope that Obama would continue to take the high road and help Palin if ever she does ask for help… even if she is a jerk. :)

Posted by: GladItsOver | November 8, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

She needs to throw away those coke bottle glasses she wears. That lady is just annoying.

Posted by: whqt667 | November 8, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Sarah, hun, your 15 minutes are OVER! Go back to work as the Gov and be a hockey mom. Go ahead and try to run in 2012 but when you do I for one will volunteer every bit of my extra time and money to support Obama/Biden and make sure you lose!

Posted by: Janomaha | November 8, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Palin is a POLITICIAN. Too friggin bad if she can’t take the same crap she dished out. she could have been President in January…I don’t give a hoot about her hurt feelings. Bush is a subpar bozo but to his credit, I’ve never heard him gripe about being called every name under the Iraqi sun.

Posted by: Jim Macko | November 8, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Ooooh! Didums Sarah-honey have her feelings hurt? Poor baby. Now maybe you have an idea of what it felt like to be on the recieving end of YOUR nasty, mean-sprited, small-minded, divisive hypocritical and spiteful remarks. Shut up and take your medicine, you twit.
Oh and one other thing. Do us all a favor and stay in Alaska. You no more belong on the National political stage than a muppet belongs in an opera.

Posted by: Lee | November 8, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

80% of polled republicans want sarah to run in 2012.
her state is the only recession proof state in the union.
she is the most popular governor in the nation.
she scares the libs and that is the best thing about sarah…

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

solohere: “It would be interesting to know wether she reads all these well thought out remarks”
Like she reads newspapers (well ‘sort of’ reads)

Posted by: Jim Macko | November 8, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Just because a news source is said to be anonymous does not mean the network releasing the story does not know their source themselves. They do have to be careful.
“…it’s immature, it’s unprofessional and those guys are jerks…” Jerks? Now who is immature and unprofessional?
What is obvious is that Palin alienated those assigned to her. She did not build loyalty and affection for herself.
And in relation to the sword quotes, here is one that has been variously attributed, most recently to Boris Yeltsin: “You can make a throne of bayonets, but you can’t sit on it for long.”
That could also apply to the Republican party and the base they built for themselves. They are finding it hard to sit on.

Posted by: Shockolit | November 8, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I actually feel bad for Palin to some extent…
it is not her fault that she was thrown into a situation that she was overwhelmingly unqualified for.
It is her fault that she chose to go as false as she did…about just about everything…
but she was acting like a drama in small town government so she doesn’t no any other way I think.
she should have never been near this situation.

Posted by: dl | November 8, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Northernlights: “80% of polled republicans want sarah to run in 2012.’
Baloney. But I assure you 100% of Democrats want the fool to run in 2012.

Posted by: Jim Macko | November 8, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Don’t you just love guys like Rhys who defend Palin and then say that Obama is going to make the US of A socialist? Do they seem to forget (or not know) that Alaska is quite socialist with its ‘share the oil wealth’ plan. All citizens receive a check from the gov’t from the state’s oil revenue whether they own any of the land the oil was found on or not. They all sounds like little spoiled children that don’t get their way.

Posted by: avoter1 | November 8, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Sorry Sarah…you loose. No crown for you. You embarassed McCain (who chose you as a token) with your ignorance, your family problems, your empty headed spending (just like a beauty padgent girl).
Thank goodness neither one of you won.

Posted by: SAILINBY | November 8, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Kay: “Why doesn’t McCain come to her defense? Put out some sort of statement?”
Why, she can’t handle criticism by herself….and she could have been President in Januaty… is she totally incompetent?

Posted by: Jim Macko | November 8, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

it was the ivy league genius’s that brought our economy to the brink of collapse.
me, i will settle for the citizen politician-go sarah.
by the way i absolutely love watching libs go absolutely nuts over sarah…very entertaining. the mere mention of her name drives you guys off the cliff and exposes your intolerance …

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I wonder how many people here have come across someone that is misguided but otherwise has the potential to learn from their mistakes, and grow personally.That is not the case here. I see absolutely no way that Ms. Palin (who is 44 years old) has enough time left to ever learn what most people know by the time they are eighteen. It just will not happen. During the course of two months she screwed up about everything she attempted— yet never admitted even the slightest mistake. According to these reports, she refused to apply herself to learning the policies and issues for the interviews and debates. Now she can talk about how these private missteps never happened that way. We all witnessed the public ones. And, we did not take those out of context. So, she should shut her face–or– use it to admit that she was unprepared for this job. While she is bashing herself for not knowing simple facts for a hole in the ground, she should also bash McCain for exposing such an intelligently challenged women from Alaska to a barrage from the press and the American people, and endangering this country. Ninety percent of the blame for the Palin thing rests with McCain and his staff. The religious right is not the fault here— only the reason. They were temptation to evil, but McCain failed to resist that temptation. He fell under their sphere of influence– and, he paid dearly. But, I agree with those who noticed how relieved he was to have lost. I am sure he felt GUILT beyond redemption–for in the end he knew how badly he had let the country down with the Palin selection. It is a mixed bag with the opposition does something so stupid..but thats life. After watching the news conference the other day it is clear: McCain helped the best man win.

Posted by: jrc903 | November 8, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The wicked witch of the west is gone!She gives a bad name to good witches.

Posted by: michael | November 8, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

80% of recent post election polled republicans support sarah yes they do.
by the way in case you guys have not figured it out yet…neither sarah nor her supporters expect obama followers to support her-so your wasting your time blasting her…

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

The pseudo intellectual and phony elitist wing of the GOP and the democrats would like to destroy Governor Sarah Palin as quickly as possible!
She is young, authentic, smart, tough, intuitive, likeable, transparent, easy to communicate with, has a genuine moral center, has core American values and ethics, has inherent wisdom, a record of change and reform, and is as normal and American as apple pie! :)
So, she is a huge threat to those who want to manipulate power to their advantage!
Governor Sarah Palin is a one-of-a-kind great leader! :)

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

“Jim Macko Like she reads newspapers…..” Good one!!! haaa

Posted by: SOLOHERE | November 8, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

by the way in case you guys didn’t know this, in 4 or 8 years obama will be just another picture on the wall. in 4 years if he blows it we will show him the exit sign. if he does ok 8 years.
i know you guys thought you had elected a king for life.
election 2012 has already begun, and soon obama will be yesterdays news just like the other’s.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Sticks and stones dan! :)
I repeat:
The pseudo intellectual and phony elitist wing of the GOP and the democrats would like to destroy Governor Sarah Palin as quickly as possible!
She is young, authentic, smart, tough, intuitive, likeable, transparent, easy to communicate with, has a genuine moral center, has core American values and ethics, has inherent wisdom, a record of change and reform, and is as normal and American as apple pie! :)
So, she is a huge threat to those who want to manipulate power to their advantage!
Governor Sarah Palin is a one-of-a-kind great leader! :)

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I’m telling you, Jake, that you need to step back and evaluate what you are doing with this gossip column reporting. Even if this is only a “blog”, you are identifying yourself as something much less than a serious journalist. Eventually it will catch up with you and you will end up on one of those expose shows. From there it is a short ride out the door.

Posted by: jcarob | November 8, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Obama is a self-centered talker who will repay those morons who voted for him with higher taxes and lower living standard. Don’t wait for the check in the mailbox. Write check and send out more to Obama. He did not win this election. He bought it.
Palin can give every one a check and more qualified to be the mangeer of the country. Like it or not.

Posted by: liberalrepulican | November 8, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

her obama supporters i understand that now you will be expected to dish out millions of online donations for obamas transition, expenses vetting abd relocation of hired hands etc… expected to be in the millions suckers…

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Palin cannot understand why everyone makes bad remarks about her…she doesn’t have the mental capacity to do so. Soooooo glad she doesn’t have a chance to become President by default.
Unsure times are here…but I think we have a man who is intelligent and ambitious in the right ways.

Posted by: DOINIT | November 8, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

I agree that McCain seemed relieved to lose!
I really don’t think he had the energy or the intestinal fortitude to deal with the booby prize of POTUS in this time of crisis!
The best thing McCain accomplished was to bring Governor Palin on the scene and to give the GOP time to regroup!
It would have been better if he would have dealt with the thuggish attacks on Governor Palin but he didn’t have the energy to do that either!
His campaign was an unorganized mess from square one! :(

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

OBAMANATION:
Do you honestly think Obama isn’t intelligent enough to be President? If you are, you are in the very small minority, even for republicans. You don’t get to the top of Harvard Law School by being average. Palin has to prove herself. And if you don’t understand that, maybe Palin is smarter than you are.

Posted by: unshrub | November 8, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Obama was running a good campaign to rescue the country, McCain was running a side show, parading Sarah Palin with a 150,000 dollar wardrobe. What was he thinking—a beauty contest, or what?

Posted by: what667 | November 8, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“Cruel”, “cowardly”, “jerks”? Yep, that about sums up the Republican party.

Posted by: whoiamnow | November 8, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

obama supporters your time would be best spent having bake sales to raise money to keep feeding your beast as he is going to expect you to donate to his transition and inauguration expenses projected to be in the millions. suckers!

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Don’t feel bad for Sarah Palin. She is a tough, motivated, happy warrior. She will be back in four years to once again send the left into another fit of feces throwing panic. I believe she will also spend the next four years holding Obama accountable for his failures; something the media seems incapable of doing.
For supporters of Palin, remember the left does not attack those that are not a threat to them. They know that once she is put in front of the American people over a prolonged period she will win them over much as Reagan did. Also, when she becomes the Republican standard bearer the conservative movement will come out to destroy Obama. There is simply too much information on this guy that the press has ignored and it will ultimately be brought forth.
After four years of unchecked liberalism America will elect almost anyone the Republicans put up. Fortunately for America, that person will be Sarah Palin.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Do you honestly think Obama isn’t intelligent enough to be President? If you are, you are in the very small minority, even for republicans. You don’t get to the top of Harvard Law School by being average. Palin has to prove herself. And if you don’t understand that, maybe Palin is smarter than you are.

Posted by: unshrub | November 8, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Those GOP guys bashing Palin are jerks. But that’s the GOP — they eat their own when they’re not successful at eating others. Hopefully Palin will disappear into the woodwork. The fault lies with McCain who picked her not her for trying her best.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | November 8, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

James:
Roger that.

Posted by: John | November 8, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Is it so hard to see that what the left and the right want in a politician is so far removed that these posts do not even make sense. Palin is very attractive to single issue voters and her supporters do not care about her knowledge of the economy, foreign affairs, social security, enviornmental issues, or the other problems that face states that are not supported (read socialism) from big buisness. What her supporters care about are issues like abortion, or religion or what gay people do in their bedroom, and the claim of government staying out of individuals buisness (somehow that does not include government staying out of the bedroom or the dotors office). I have no problem with Palin being the spokeswomen for her causes, but maybe it is that the liberals give the republicans more credit than they give themselves. I truly believe the republicans have smarter people in their ranks than Sara Palin. I am not putting her down in anyway, but when it comes to someone capable of being the most powerful person in the world, is that the best you got? Why do you keep giving us people who are not scholars, because quite frankly the left would like to be represented by someone who can think and speak at the same time about a variety of issues.

Posted by: vissionquest | November 8, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

unshrub: If you think Obama is that intelligent, why did he have to use the speeches of RFK, MLK and JFK on the platform adding additional words of his own. He is not the only one who graduated from Harvard. And he is not using his intelligence picking people from Bill Clinton’s administratiton. You call that change? Of course not. And Emanuel. Next probably will be Bill Richardson who I understand did a lousy job for Clinton. I don’t think he knows who to pick and who not to. He better ask his advisor’s. And to say the least Caroline Kennedy should be out of the question.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Obama is a freaking idiot. He didn’t even know that Russia had veto power in the U.N. All of the leaders of the world are laughing their …. off at him today, his policies are juvenile.
Wall St. is tanking on his economic policies because he doesn’t even know economics 101. And two states in the US that are booming Arizona and Alaska.
The cities and towns that are booming, the ones that have the lowest tax rates. Georgetown Texas, 270 new businesses in the last two years, no individual and no corporate income taxes.

Posted by: marythedesigner | November 8, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

If name-calling is what you want, honey, you’ve given us plenty of ammunition…

Posted by: Lily Bell | November 8, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

palin has proven what she has to offer –(NOT VERY MUCH) SHE SIMPLY HAS SHOWN HOW UNEDUCATED SHE IS.five years for a degree in journalism that is something that could be done part time local campus.–my bigest problem is trying to understand how she ever became governer of alaska,—something does not smell right with her–and also she has assets far beyond her earnings.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

dem in Chicago: And I am hoping he makes so many blunders he doesn’t win again. And the remarks about Nancy Reagan were uncalled for. Secondly, how did he know about Nancy Reagan. That was over twenty years ago. His choosing of Emanuel is going to be a disaster for Nancy Pelosi who wants control. From what I understand Emanuel is rough but he will run into the wrong person and then look out.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

She’s right! They are jerks and they’re cowards, too! I was taught that if you have something to say about someone, to say it to their face! It’s a coward that goes behind someone’s back and says things “anonymously”!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 8, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Danny: What do you mean unprofessional. They are idiotic jerks who probably will never accomplish anything in their lifetime. And who cares about Africa whether it is a continent or country. I took geography and history in school and that’s where I left it. Africa is not the issue, the issues are the economy. And Katie Couric is a joke. She worked for ABC, CNN was fired, NBC on the Today Show where ratings fell and now CBS and they thought about releasing her. She is a disaster and should try another occupation for herself. Palin did good for herself from Mayor to Governor. Obama never ran anything in his lifetime but was an attorney for a crook. He has a reputation or choosing crooks and terrorists for friends which Palin doesn’t have. Nancy Pelosi and Dean helped him win the nomination by deleting delegates from Hillary. And the Clinton’s were fools for campaigning for him.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

McCain won’t put out a statement because she already has hurt his imagine. The concession speech was our real McCain. The leash crap didn’t work for the pitbull. They let her loose alittle and bang it was over… What a dummy. She’s still cute…but doesn’t belong in any governmental office. She ruin herself when she opened her mouth. Todd was the show for her in Alaska…that’s why he sat in on meetings so he could repeat to her what the meaning of the meetings represented.
The truth has come out and they got more they are awaiting her return in 2012….

Posted by: ToddL | November 8, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

This needs to be over soon. Palin should be out of the spotlight, and our focus should be back on the real issues facing Americans.
She created problems from early on, from her interviews, her negative spewing, and spending sprees (hey can I have her clothes if they’re donated…we’re the same size!)
It’s over. Americans spoke volumes. Let’s not give her any more air time!

Posted by: Marybeth | November 8, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

They should have asked her was Africa a Continent? during the interview! I bet she couldn’t remember the real answer – even after the news media has posted the answer all over the world… I betcha she didn’t remember the correct answer… What a beauty queen she is..

Posted by: TomtheMailman | November 8, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Concerned in Ohio: The problem the aides have with Palin is jealousy reeks among them because the RNC wanted her to buy very expensive clothing to wear on the platform. That’s when hate came into the picture. McCain’s aides cannot afford that luxary and got steamed up over it, so they have to makeup some type of story on her. However, these kind of people never will accomplish anything in their lifetime and will always be what the are. Nobody’s.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

palin looks and sounds like someone out of a b movie—-wonder what mccain meant when he said he found his (SOUL MATE)—it must have been one of his alzhimers eppisodes.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

They just do not want her running in 2012.
The Election is over. For those running the propaganda machine after an election are the low lives.
The ones not to be trusted

Posted by: seah | November 8, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

the old saying–that you cannot make a silk purse out of a pig in lipstick is true—-hope i never hear that screeching voice again.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Why McCain not defending Palin since they are buddies???

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 8, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

TomtheMailman: Tell me, what has Africa got to do with the issues in this country? Who cares about Africa. This is America and asking a dumb question like that comes from a humbskull. I don’t even remember myself what it was and don’t care. In fact, I don’t care what happens to other countries but America.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

move on. work together. we are all Americans. The election is over. the politics of hate and division have been voted out.

Posted by: guava boy | November 8, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

I’m not sure who the bigger goofs are here: The idiots that are saying these things and are ‘remaining anonymous’ or the news media for even reporting this junk…I expect this from the Enquirer…but come on. Palin is sharp – not many could have done the speech she did with a whole three days of prep. Not many at all.

Posted by: Bill | November 8, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

As much as I enjoyed bashing that ugly she dog during the election, the election is over and it is time to move on. McCain picked her and is entirely to blame. He has suffered the consequences.
It is time to move on and work on repairing the massive damage to our economy that is the legacy of the laissez-faire republican policies.

Posted by: TimZ | November 8, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

after the election myself family and friends were ready to move on and at least give obama a chance. but after all the continued attacks, and vile, ugly, smears on sarah i am no longer willing to be as kind. this level of hatred only serves to galvanize her supporters. last check 48% of americans voted for mccain/palin that is almost half of the population.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Sarah Palin represents the “G” on the GOP coalition.
The Gullible, that is (so called value-voters, holier-than-thou moral majoritarians and gun manufacturing lackeys).
The “O” is for the Obnoxious (Joe the Plumber and his ilk, as well as the Neocons).
The “P” is for the Parasites (the greedy, filthy rich who were the true beneficiaries of Republican economic policy and who screwed us all with their reckless speculators);
SO, THAT IS WHAT “G-O-P’ STANDS FOR.
NOW YOU KNOW.

Posted by: Tucu | November 8, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

so wrong_cowards: You are absolutely right. And I believe these aides were jealous of Palin from the start because she is what they can never be in their lifetime and that the RNC purchased her expensive clothing. Palin is a down to earth person and has a good personality. I believe the republican party is going to call on her no doubt to run for the presidency in 2012. McCain I liked, I voted for him because I felt that he was well qualified to lead this country. And this young generation of college students who think they know better than us are going to get a big backlash because Emanuel and Pelosi aren’t going to see eye to eye. There is going to be trouble in his administration.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

i will bet that marianne has a giant picture of obama on her parlor wall.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Palin will be back in 2012 because she has a lot of ambition and Todd wants it more than her… The GOP will keep the rest of the dirt for 2012 primaries..and she will have to answer questions during the debates without sicking to scripted points… She’ll be back!

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Us Dems always new Palin was stupid, it’s just took awhile for some in the Republican party to figure it out. There will always be some who follow Palin but her career is trashed.

Posted by: PhilBgood | November 8, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

mike
please dont tell us she will be back—–we have had enough punishment—more would be cruel and ususual punishment.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The problem with Palin is simple. She was “sold” to conservative constituents just like every thing else.
Think about it for a second. What’s foundation of “conservative” politics? They are the anti-big-government party. Can you show me ONE Republican leader who has ever DEFINED that for his/her constituents? They not only preach it but they also spend money like crazy. Yet, the follow in mass chanting this slogan over and over with little to no thought.
Palin is where she should stay and that is Alaska. A state where you don’t have understand anything other than Alaskan issues.
If the Republicans try to pass her off on the public again the Democrats will have an easier time winning the office in 2012. It’s that simple.

Posted by: Dems | November 8, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

after the election myself family and friends were ready to move on and at least give obama a chance. but after all the continued attacks, and vile, ugly, smears on sarah i am no longer willing to be as kind. this level of hatred only serves to galvanize her supporters. last check 48% of americans voted for mccain/palin that is almost half of the population.
Um – this stuff is coming from McCain aides. This is Republicans throwing mud. “This level of hatred” is coming from YOUR side. The Democrats aren’t paying attention so much.

Posted by: Jennifer | November 8, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Interesting that the hate and divisiveness is still coming from the Repubs.– only know it’s directed at each other. The rest of us don’t care. There are big problems to fix and we have to get busy. `

Posted by: hopesprings52 | November 8, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

it is funny to see the repub dogs fighting amoung themselves—what an act—just fire rove the super freak.

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Sarah Palin is one of those self-absorbed, self-righeous people that think they are better than and smarter than the average person. In a town the size of Wasilla let’s face her election as mayor was a popularity contest not one of who was the most qualified. That election then gave her the sense of self-importance to run for governor in a state that has what about one-eight the population of Philadelphia. Once she was tapped for VP she should have had the brains to learn what was needed policywise for her speeches and interviews, but no she thought just being folksy and winking was enough. As it turned out it didn’t pay off. Maybe for some people it is enough to be “cutesy”, but I prefer my leaders to be smart and preferablly smarter than every other countries leaders.
I must say from what I read hear and from the Republicans I’ve talked to since the election it only reinforces my view that the Republicans are the most mean-spirited, narrow-mined, bigoted, un-Christian like people I have ever met.

Posted by: I've had it | November 8, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

IT SURE FEELS GOOD TO BE ON THE WINNING SIDE—LET THE LOSERS FIGHT AMOUNG THEMSELVES.
MCCAINS TRAVELING CIRCUS IS FALLING APART

Posted by: rodney | November 8, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

how right you are “had it”..she is the dumbest Gov in the whole 57 states!

Posted by: fultzy | November 8, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Yeah, that’s it: Washington needs more intellectuals. If only Barney Frank had been just a little more nuanced and if Chris Dodd had only known the capital of Botswana they might have realized that forcing banks to give mortgages to unqualified borrows in the name of the Communist Reinvestment Act the world’s stock markets might have avoided $10 trillon in losses and counting and we might not be looking down the barrel of a worldwide depression that your grandchildren will be lucky to not feel.
Yeah, let’s get more of the same slimey splineless wonks in Washington to really clean things up and let’s leave any proven corruption busting problem solvers out of this. Fun sullying their borrowed clothes only goes so far.
My single issue is to break the inherent corruption on both sides and mindless duplicity of our “leaders”. Can anyone not understand that 4 years from now Obama will be as hated as Bush is and as Clinton was 8 years ago and Bush was 16 years ago and Reagan was before that.
What will it take for you to understand the system is broken or will you just drowned in your Democrat/Republican/status quo loving asininity?

Posted by: John | November 8, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Study hard, Sarah. You have proven yourself in Alaska, now you need to educate yourself on national and world affairs. You have potential and it is now up to you. Afterall, that is the American way.

Posted by: Millie | November 8, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

please some one tell me if it was not a race thing then how was that interview in Harlem where several african americans was asked how they liked Obamas running mate Sara Palin, and most of them said she was a good choice. So what did I miss here was she on both tickets or was this 95% voting of afican americans because Obama was the best Man. come on most of them that voted this year has never and futher more had to be picked up and bused over just for there vote. please Stop putting your self down. the Dems was running the show the last Four YEARS PLEASE LOOK AT THE HOUSE AND ASK YOUR SELF COULD THIS BE OUR MESS NOT THE REPUBLICANS. YES BUSH DID NOT DO THIS ALONE MATER OF FACT YOU DID. AND IT WILL JUST GET WORSE NOW THAT EVEN MORE DEMS, HAVE TAKING SEATS IN THE HOUSE.
PLEASE TELL ME THE STROY ABOUT THE THREE LITTLE PIGS NOW.

Posted by: justforusa1776 | November 8, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I always thought the entire McCain campaign staff … including those serving Palin were Democrats. Wake up, Republicans!!

Posted by: Ned | November 8, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

So now the elections are over and the media needs some extra news flashes to have something to report. This whole election the media has step onto unethical bounds and what’s news worthy is stupidity at the hands of publicly that are destroying people. It’s shameful and unintelligent reporting. This whole campaign we saw Hillary go down now Palin. I didn’t see the same questions asked to Biden, Obama, or even McCain for that matter, somehow it’s ok if you are a woman seeking public office to endure sexism, torment and your name being pounced on. Again, if these so called folks had the guts to come forward it still is chicken poop because enough is enough. It’s time for the media to stop the garbage at the door with filtering for real news worthy stories and less gossip.

Posted by: Mel | November 8, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I believe McCain’s aids! Palin is an idiot and it’s already been proven time and time again!
Now she doesn’thave anyone hiding her mistakes and more of the ugly truth is surfacing.
No Wonder McCain’s campaign put a muzzle on her so long.
And she is supposedly the future of the Republican party? HA! What a joke!

Posted by: Sara in Dallas | November 8, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

OINK, the party’s over. Time to return the glass slippers.

Posted by: WasillaJack | November 8, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

*sighs* Palin is terminally clueless, and proud to be. She doesn’t need facts, she’s got everything she needs in the Bible and her prejudices.
Sort of like the Taliban, only the US version.
And yes, the stories about her not knowing that Africa is a continent, and not knowing what countries make up NAFTA sounds utterly credible. Especially in the light of her answers in the Couric interview (which she seemed to have refused to prepare for). Governor Palin simply is as ignorant as they come.
Reports of her emotional instability (temper tantrums at bad news clippings) fit in well with the image of spiteful vindictiveness that emerges from her political career so far. And so do the denials and statements that she bears no ill will to any of the campaign staff. The image of smarmy female politician whose only skill lies in projecting an image.
Now perhaps none of that’s an impediment to presidency. If only she would leave the thinking to others (there’s got to be another Cheney stashed away somewhere) and then listen to them. Unfortunately that’s something she doesn’t do either. It seems she wasn’t about to take advice on the Couric interview, and so she crashed and burned.
That makes her stupid.
We know that. The really scary thing about her is that that’s exactly what appeals to a special kind of “conservatives”.
Not the thinking kind, the other kind. Unhappily enough they still exist in large numbers.
Well … unless she hires some pretty heavy media outfit and a sharp speech-writer we can forget about her for the next four years.

Posted by: Golodh | November 8, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Is she an idiot? YES. Did some of these idiots recommend her for the VP role? YES. Did they try to pitch her to the rest of the country? YES. IDIOTS + IDIOTS = MORE IDIOTS

Posted by: EE4ever | November 8, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

justforusa
this mess was created from 2000 to 2006
when the republicans were in full power…
try to spin as you may
the last 2 years has been all about trying to clean up all the things that
“we broke so we bought”
it took 6 years of slime and bologne and fear to get us in this mess…it’s going to take us decades to get it back.
all because stupid and bad people pushed Bush on us…
and Palin” is the new Bush.

Posted by: dl | November 8, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

rodney – dang you must be oh so smart. Why didn’t you run for Pres. You seem to have all the answers. Maybe Obama will ask you to be a member of his administration then you can get a hint of what it’s all about. All you people that believe he is going to pay your morgage, more food stamps, free health care, buy your gas – I have some oceanfront property in Arizona I’ll give you. Good luck but if it don’t happen you can’t blame me. Pelosi and Reed will wind him up.

Posted by: C Good | November 8, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

We have seen what happens when Democrats control the presidency and congress. With Obama the Democrats have already started to overreach. What is our first clue that we are starting to see a replay of Carter? Democrats have announced that they now want to tax your 401k contributions. This is bad enough but they are also proposing that the money in current 401k accounts be confiscated from citizens and dumped into a fund that you will no longer have control of. For giving up your lifetime 401k savings you will be given a measly $600 monthly maximum benefit. Is this what you envisioned when Obama promised to “spread the wealth”?
This should scare the heck out of every American.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I don’t understand why people still
talk about Palin who have graduated from
five different college(BA in Journalism)
or not,what we don’t know for sure.Then
her “troopergate” ” Her RNC Clothing story” I mean this woman is a Low grade
below caliber woman.How she became mayor
or Governor is a big question.Who voted for her.This woman can talk nasty.Any way she is a matter of disguise,A JOKE ?

Posted by: mksyed | November 8, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

mksyed
You can ridicule Gov. Palin if you want but she is not proposing raising taxes on 401k contributions and ultimately confiscating the money we currently have in our accounts. I would much rather have a president Palin than a President Obama if this is representative of what we can expect from his administration.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Palin 2012 – She understands that your 401k money belongs to you – not to the GOVERNMENT!

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Palin 2012 – She understands that it diminishes us as human beings when we allow children who survive an abortion to be deprived of healthcare, deprived of the warmth and love found in a human touch, and ultimately left to die in a cold, sterile medical tray – robbed of their human dignity.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Kris, the only shot Palin will have in 2012 is if she is still hunting down defenseless animals and I hope she miss
the target like she missed the target of
VP.

Posted by: incME | November 8, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

This is what it sounds like when the GOP implodes, and it’s music to me ears.

Posted by: Coburn | November 8, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

I think McCain surrounded himself with some unprofessional staff in his campaign and this is coming out now. Nothing like turning on your own kind in a frenzy of self mutilation. Jerks is to good of a term for this behavior. No wonder the Democrats won with this conduct. Remember these people in the future.

Posted by: richard warren | November 8, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Not that I supported Palin or McCain…but this type of back biting is terribe. Just a few weeks ago, the same people that are airing this junk now and not attaching their names to it were the same people who were saying she was ready to be VP and even President if need be. Now, they are saying that she did not know the countries in NAFTA or that Africa is a continent and not a country. This is sad and just shows the really hateful spirit of some people. I guess the only solace is that Palin sees how it feels now. After all, she was up bombarding Obama with crap that was fed to her by the same people who are trashing her now. KARMA once again.

Posted by: francheska ;-) | November 8, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Palin 2012 – She understands that you cannot punish small businesses with higher and higher taxes and expect them to continue to hire new employees or to keep their existing employees.
On taxes – Palin IQ=200 / Obama IQ=3

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Guys,
Anyone heard about the Illinoi State lottery number drawn 666 the day after the election?

Posted by: zeferimus | November 8, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Everyone is saying Palin 2012. 2012 is a long way off and who knows where this country will by then. Who would have thought in 2004 that an African-American would be elected President in 2008. Things change and Palin is in Alaska and from the look of it some people the Republican are trying to damage her reputation to the point that she is just a laughing stock of the Republican Party.

Posted by: mary | November 8, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Coburn-
I love my children and do hug them each day. I just want all children to know that there is an adult in their life, somewhere, at least at one point, who loved them enough to be courageous. And yes, I do support other children through my donations to charity and through volunteering my time to care for children born to unwed mothers.
—————————-
Palin 2012 – She understands that it diminishes us as human beings when we allow children who survive an abortion to be deprived of healthcare, deprived of the warmth and love found in a human touch, and ultimately left to die in a cold, sterile medical tray – robbed of their human dignity.
—————————-

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Palin 2012 – She understands that good governance does not extend from meaningless but flowery language, but in truth, extends from the power of ideas, the power of vision, and the power found in uplifting the human spirit through incentive.
Obama, not so much.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Posted by: wth52 | November 8, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

As an Obama supporter, I’m very entertained with the infighting of the GOP. But give me a break when people are saying that Palin didn’t know Africa is a continent. That’s in par with trying to push that Obama thought there are 57 states. In Obama’s case, having a JD exempts him from such ridicules and people who keep using it against him sound like idiots. In Palin’s case, the fact that she developed a reputation similar to Bush doesn’t help her. But even I find it completely absurd that the McCain people and the media (surprised it was a Fox reporter) are pushing such a stupid idea. Obviously, it was taken out of context.

Posted by: iQuack8 | November 8, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Curt: “the power found in uplifting the human spirit through incentive”
Very strange comment. Sounds kind of cynical.

Posted by: iQuack8 | November 8, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Also speaking of meaningless language… also:
“Oil of coal, of course, is a fungible commodity and they don’t flag, ya know, the molecules where, where it’s going to, where it’s not, but and in the, in the sense of the Congress today they know our very, very hungry domestic markets that need that oil first. So I believe that what Congress is going to do also is not to allow the export bans to such a degree that it’s Americans who get stuck holding the bag without the energy source that is produced here, pumped here; it’s gotta flow into our domestic markets first.” — Sarah Palin, Energy Expert

Posted by: Fungible Molecule | November 8, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

God rest America’s soul . . . She will be destroyed from within like every other perverse superpower before . . . Attention America – Rome is burning and Nero is a fiddling . . . Most of you sheeple won’t even know the significance of that statement or it reflective irony upon America . . . Good night and God rest the American way of life . . . But hey at least Nobama can! . . . Four years from now will we be better off . . . No! . . . Will Nobama raise taxes upon himself? . . . No! . . . Socialism is alive and well here in the United Socialist States of America . . . .

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Also again, speaking of meaningless language also:
“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, we’re ill about this position that we have been put in. Where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh, it’s got to be about job creation, too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So health care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade – we have got to see trade as opportunity, not as, uh, competitive, um, scary thing, but one in five jobs created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation.” — Sarah Palin, Economy Expert

Posted by: Fungible Molecule | November 8, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

a pig with lipstick
thanks gop..the gift that will keep on giving

Posted by: beware of the New World Order | November 8, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

iQuack8
You are correct; I find Obama’s approach to governance to be devoid of anything that champions the values of hard work, persistence, or self motivated responsibility. No government will survive much less thrive if it has its basis in class envy, the culture of need, the culture of expecting something for nothing, and the culture of transferring responsibility for success to a governmental agency

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

This is no rumor!
11/05/2008 Evening Pick 3 = 666

Posted by: zeferimus | November 8, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

The plus is if she does run in 2012, Obama can have another 4 years to get this mess fully straightened out.

Posted by: Jwench | November 8, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Curt your time and money is no solution. Get back to me when you think of a solution. Those who think America is doomed you’ve bought into the fearolotics for too long. If you are scared go to your bunker and hunker. I’ll be up here working for a better tomorrow.

Posted by: Coburn | November 8, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Danny: What do you mean unprofessional. They are idiotic jerks who probably will never accomplish anything in their lifetime.
_________________________________
They were McCain aides. Are you saying that directly serving John McCain during his Presidential campaign is not an accomplishment?
And what I meant is this: using juvenile name-calling is far beneath the dignity of someone aspiring to be a high-ranking leader of the United States.

Posted by: Danny | November 8, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Oh, also I almost also forgot:
“That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and on our other side, the land boundary that we have with- Canada. It- it’s funny that a comment like that was- kind of made to- cari- I don’t know, you know? Reporters” — Sarah Palin, Foreign Policy Expert

Posted by: Fungible Molecule | November 8, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

It’s a match made in heaven: A pretty woman with a self-inflated sense of importance because of a profound inability to gauge her own limitations, and a failing GOP party desperate for a charismatic, Joan-of-Arc leader to lead them the way out of the wilderness. Unfortunately, Palin is no Queen Elizabeth. If this much of her ignorance has been exposed in 2 short months, what would 2 years of hard campaigning do?

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I think all of you idiots should layoff of Sarah Palin. She and her people are good hearted people, she worked her heart out for 5 months and doesn’t deserve to be dissed this way. I’m a democrat and I voted for Obama, but this whole thing disgusts me. Leave her alone.

Posted by: Jenny | November 8, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Coburn,
My time and money are not enough? What else does any of use have to offer? If the commitment of time and money mean nothing then we have no hope. I refuse to believe that. As bad as I expect an Obama presidency to be, and we have a pretty good indication with the 401k takeover found in a previous post, America will survive. However, that does not mean that we will reclaim our lost freedoms, our human dignity, or our lost self reliance without going through a lot of pain. My point in this argument and in the argument found in support of helping the most vulnerable and defenseless in our society is to prevent the replay of the failed and destructive policies and beliefs of the past. I am first and foremost a proud American; I will not hunker down and pretend that harm is not harm and that I am powerless to prevent the gathering concerns that are represented by the thoughts and ideals of an Obama administration.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Sarah Palin will never survive the Republican Primaries in 2012

Posted by: blindhowlin | November 8, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Well … unless she hires some pretty heavy media outfit and a sharp speech-writer we can forget about her for the next four years. Posted by: Golodh
Well, it worked for Obama! :)
but, the best thing McCain accomplished was to bring Governor Palin on the scene and to give the GOP time to regroup!
It would have been better if he would have dealt with the thuggish attacks on Governor Palin but he didn’t have the energy or the intestinal fortitude to do that!
His campaign was an unorganized mess from square one! :(
Now, the pseudo intellectual and phony elitist wing of the GOP and the democrats would like to destroy Governor Sarah Palin as quickly as possible!
She is young, authentic, smart, tough, intuitive, likeable, transparent, easy to communicate with, has a genuine moral center, has core American values and ethics, has inherent wisdom, a record of change and reform, and is as normal and American as apple pie! :)
So, she is a huge threat to those who want to manipulate power to their advantage!
Governor Sarah Palin is a one-of-a-kind great leader! :)

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I think the Republican party is showing its true colors, attacking Sarah Palin. They snubbed her after McCain lost, they either blamed her for his loss or they were done using her which I think is what they were really doing in the first place. I don’t doubt there were intelligent people working behind the scenes on the McCain campaign(it was reported they called Palin and family the hillbillies from Wasilla) and of course Republicans can be downright prideful or hold up their noses at people they feel aren’t up to snuff or cutting the mustard intellectually or worse(as exemplified by Palin’s situation). What is scary is that these are the same tactics used to elect Bush and they were trying to do the same this time. Give another moron for the American people to elect. Sorry I don’t mean to be anymore mean than others(Republicans and Democrats included) have been to Palin, but the Republican party asked for it.

Posted by: Dan | November 8, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Aware2u
Well stated. Sarah Palin is one of those rare politicians who don’t just play along to get along. What she accomplished in Alaska should have been a model for the future administration. Instead we have elected a man who will bring more growth in government with associated increases in the deficit, even though people are mad at Bush for the same sin. We elected a man who has never been in a position of singular responsibility instead of being just one vote in a group, even though we rightly questions Bush’s background and results in the same regards. And, we elected a man who has shown a deep seated arrogance, even though we rightly judge Bush to be lacking in the same trait.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Sarah Palin is a “JERK” for knowingly running for a job that was “OVER HER HEAD!

Posted by: Shay | November 8, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

In the end, it wasn’t Palin or her underwhelming lack of understanding of the issues, it was the fact that McCain tried to palm her off on us just to get a few votes. His disregard for the future of America was so egregious that even GOP stalwarts couldn’t accept the possibility and turned to Obama to SAVE the U.S. from McCain/Palin.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

YOU BETCHA!

Posted by: Jesús | November 8, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I am neither a democrat nor a republican because both parties have demonstrated cannibalization of their own.
Governor Sarah Palin was the only breath of life in the general election!
She is an authentic reformer and may put a new face on the pseudo intellectual and phony elitist republican party. :)
If so, I will take a second look at the GOP and Sarah Palin 2012 and or 2016!
All you angry Obama worshippers and pseudo Republican intellectuals and phony elitists are doing Sarah Palin a favor! You are keeping her in the news! :)
By the way, I watched that spooky moment too as Obama raised his arm over a mesmerized crowd when he gave his somber speech Tuesday night! The world has seen this before! :(

Posted by: aware2u | November 8, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Oh Geez, “What she accomplished in Alaska”
Are you kidding, first she bought of the citizens of Alaska with $1200 supplied by sky high oil prices, second she misused and abused her office for personal reasons, third she supports Stevens, a CONVICTED FELON and fourth the environmental degradation of Alaska under her reign will be haunting those people for 100 years. Why do you think they have the highest birth defect rate of the whole country?
Don’t you mean “what she did to” Alaska.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I wish the press would move on, I am so sick of hearing about both Sarah and Tod Palin. Go home!

Posted by: DMR | November 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

If Sarah Palin had had the same fawning media coverage that Barack Obama received she would have pulled John McCain’s sorry rear across the finish line.
I think liberals understand the threat Sarah Palin represents to their world view. Certainly Barack Obama and his accomplices in the press understood it. Ultimately the American people will watch Sarah over the next four years and will gladly elect her if she is able to continue to expand upon the successes she has had in Alaska. She will be aided in the 2012 election by Barack Obama finally having to take a stand on issues. America remains much more closely aligned with the common sense conservative values of someone like Sarah than they are with the leftist approach Obama will govern under. Neither Obama nor Palin will be able to run as a stealth candidate in 2012. That will be to the great benefit of Sarah Palin.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

These Reps Losers are more then just bitter about John McSame Failed bid for the White House . They are just in deinal about The Wasilla Hillbillies looting coast to coast . Attacking our New President Elect while we are still under The Failed Bush admin policy that just did not work. Our New President Elect has an 8 years Mess to clean up and it is not going to easy, But these McSame losers just don’t get that.

Posted by: KWOLF443 | November 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

In regard to 2012, Palin should enlist “Joe the non-plumber” for her run, I’m sure he’ll still be unemployed.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

James, she didn’t have media coverage because the republicans were scared to death that she might open her mouth and insert her foot.

Posted by: JR | November 8, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

I’m so glad she’s back home up there in Alaska! You betcha!! Now, would someone please turn off her mike.

Posted by: Achshav | November 8, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Sarah Palin unleashes a remarkable amount of hate from the left (especially in the media). Even several days after the election, they swarm to message boards like this to smear and belittle her. They loathe her but they cannot stop talking about her.
I think this is due to several psychological factors:
-Bully mentality -little people like to cut down others to feel better about themselves.
-They’re Player Haters – many women (and some men) are extremely jealous of Palin’s looks, style, success and family.
-Sexism – since everybody likes to bring up racism, I think it’s appropriate to talk about sexism. It seems to me like she was just as qualified as BO (resume wise anyway). Many of the attacks on her would never be directed at a male.
-Conservatism – she stands for smaller government, strong national defense, reform and lower taxes, things leftists hate.
-Propaganda – the media was relentless in its abuse of this woman. This election showed how effective a tool propaganda can be. Instead of reporting on the narrative, they created the narrative.
I think because she was forced to expose a lot of critiques about BO’s resume (Ayers & Co., marxism, socialism, etc.) she got the divisive label. If she didn’t put that stuff out there, the media surely wasn’t going to, and it had to be done.
Talking about BO’s background, friends, political philosophy and economic philosophy was only deemed negative because his positions are at odds with a large number of people, and in many ways the founding principles of America of personal property, liberty, and protection from big government.
All of these combine to flip a switch inside the leftist mind that releases a volcano of pent up rage. It’s really quite interesting psychology.

Posted by: Angry Left | November 8, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Jenny:
Like hounds to the kill this has become the contemporary political climate of America . . . When someone is down cannibalize upon them before they get you . . . Rome is burning and Nero is a fiddling. . . We as mankind are doomed to repeat the past . . . .

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

It has occurred to me that Palin’s supporters will find their true destiny by following their idol up north of the 49th parallel. North to Alaska!! You betcha! Independence? If that’s what it takes to keep the redneck Barbie on her side of the snow line and get Ted Stevens out of the Senate, maybe.

Posted by: Achshav | November 8, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Republicans are out for carnage and took the first available prey. Viciousness is not too surprising but the cannibalism is. For all of those Obama doubters let him prove his mettle. We will know in around four years whether we made a right choice or not. Forget the gloom and doom. It’s all in your head just like Joe the Plumber thought he made $250K. I hear in person and online the same doom forecasts from conservatives and Republicans, but let me assure you if the economy is worse it will not be Obama’s fault entirely(he isn’t even in office yet and people are already blaming him for things) just like we can’t blame Bush for everything bad in the economy right now(though he does get some credit for exacerbating some things). For the record I did not vote Obama or McCain, I voted third party for the first time in my life.

Posted by: Danny | November 8, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

JR, Sarah Palin became the most accessible of all of the candidates later in the race. Jake Tapper, to his credit, reported on this. Unfortunately, the press was more interested in repeating vindictive stories about her family than investigating her accomplishments. The press would take any made up story in any blog and run it as though it were hard news if it could portray Sarah Palin in a negative light. At the same time, the press ignored admitted drug use by Barack Obama, dismissed troubling statement such as his desire to “spread the wealth”, and generally acted as cheerleaders instead of journalist. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want less probing coverage of republicans; I just believe the future of America is too important for the press to ignore or diminish the concerns about the Democratic candidates. I don’t care what side of the ideological spectrum you are on; everyone should be concerned over media bias. We really do not know much about Barack Obama. He might turn out to be a decent man but with as little scrutiny as he has received he could also be very dangerous. We simply do not know because the press has chosen sides instead of fulfilling their important role.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

The Republican Party has no one to blame but themselves; they have lost touch with working people and conservative values a long time ago. Palin deserves some credit but they should be pointing a finger at themselves! At the end of eight years we have had out of control spending, more big government, corruption even the Democrats couldn’t match, poking their nose into matters that should be resolved on a state level, handing billions of tax payer dollars over to the Pharmaceutical Ind. by not negotiating Medicare drugs, wanting to tax our income we pay for health insurance, pandering to the extreme right religious groups for more laws and I could go on and on. Does that sound like conservative values? Those issues are why the republicans are in the shape they are!

Posted by: rickyt1234 | November 8, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Angry Left, it’s too funny how Republicans/Conservatives always rail about big government and big spending, and yet it in recent history it has always been Republican administrations that have expanded government powers, intrusion, and spent over budget balloning our deficit. Sure you don’t want the govnt. to interfere in your hobbied and interests but lets for example go and dictate into people’s private lives such as on abortion and gay rights. Also you want less taxes but want and expanded military, are you nuts? The military corporate machine is one of the most expensive items on the national budget and you all want to collect more while spending more–this is the height of insanity.

Posted by: Dan | November 8, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I betcha Sarah will never leave the upper 1 and show her face in the lower 48 ever again !!!

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

To many of you a quote from President Franklin Roosevelt. “Repetition does not transform a lie into a truth”.

Posted by: William | November 8, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

A Rasmussen poll shows that 64 percent of Republicans want Palin to run for president in 2012. If they want to lose again, that’s their business!!

Posted by: Achshav | November 8, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Sarah Palin 2012 – She understands that the money in your 401k belongs to you and not to members of congress.
This seems to be something that Barack Obama and the so called democratic congress cannot grasp.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Achshav …………………….And maybe in 2012 she can pick John McCain or Joe the plumber as her running mate.

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

BOO HOO,It’s not fair ! This couldn’t have happened to a more deserving arrogant and totally self absorbed fraud and liar ! Shut up “Moose Killer”,you brought this all on yourself !Wow,one Republican turning against another,who would have thought!

Posted by: Sharon W | November 8, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I will miss that screechy, winky, Sarah Palin. I hope in some way she runs for the Senate.
“I can see Russia from Alaska, that’s my foreign affairs experience.”
“Bush Doctrine? In what way, Charlie?”
“Well, there’s Roe vs Wade and ???”
“What newspapers do I read, well ???”
“NAFTA is what countries, wait, I know this one”
“The country of Africa, what now? You mean it’s not, well I knew that.”
“Andrew, I watch you at these debates with no notes, no papers, and yet when asked questions, you spout off facts, figures, and policies, and I’m amazed. But then I look out into the audience and I ask myself, ‘Does any of this really matter?”
It really doesn’t Sarah because we love you just the way you are—clueless.

Posted by: seemstome | November 8, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I think this is due to several psychological factors……..
==================
No. It’s due to the fact she did little more than read sarcastic speeches.
And those speeches were loaded with hypocrisy, distortions, and devisive rhetoric. (Granted, she didn’t write them. Bush speech writers did.)
It was obvious she was not prepared for national politics. Certainly she had no real knowledge of national or international issues. To hear her try and attack others when she had no business being there was insulting to many.
She may be fine for an oil rich state with no real diversity and a population comparable to Memphis, but not as a national leader.
Also, people didn’t like the RNC trying to play her off as someone she was not by misrepresenting her credentials from day one.
The attacks are NOT coming from Democrats now, but from her own campaign staff. The report above is from FOX NEWS of all places. So blame Republicans if you don’t like it.
However, the people voted. McCain/Palin lost. I agree that the petty personal attacks are not warrented and serve no purpose.

Posted by: You Missed the Real Reason | November 8, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Frenzied.When there’s nothing left to feed on, they feed on themselves. Exactly why they lost….

Posted by: Bea | November 8, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

The GOP has set Sarah up for a big fall because McCain lost on november 4th and she will get dogged to the point she will need strong antidepressants the rest of her life,they will say the trooper scandal and now a daughter who is pregnant and now the $150.000 spending spree had cost McCain the white house. The GOP has turned their back on women before, remember the former Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris after she gave Bush the keys to the white house back in 2000 they turned their back on her when she needed help from them and they never looked back.!She will need GOP help in 2012 but their won’t be any!!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I think it’s sad that the GOP is saying that Sarah is at the top of their list for 2012.
They will tear her down during the Republican Primaries because they are looking to get rid of her but they will not now because they will have to admit that she shouldn’t have been introduced to the national scene.
No amount of preparing her will get her ready. She can only speak when she is attacking – but when she is caught without those notes she is just another sarah the ?. Can’t say hockey mom – because there are sooooo many smart hockey mom’s out there – one being my wife who is a biochemist!

Posted by: Rob | November 8, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

What goes around, comes back around. She did it to Obama. Now her own party is doing it to her.
KARMA?

Posted by: RubyRed Republican | November 8, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

jg5012:
McCain is definitely not interested, ditto for Romney and Ridge. But I understand that Joe The Plumber’s people are already in VP talks with Palin’s people. He wants a commitment to $150 large for wardrobe and accessories before he continues this possible gig, though.
If JTP backs out, Todd will have to step in. He already has $40,000 worth of new clothes, unless the lawyers take them all back. I suppose he might find himself left with only the silk boxers.

Posted by: Achshav | November 8, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Sarah’s problem is that she was palling around with the McCain people and now they hate her.

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

jg5012
It is not Republicans who are standing in the way of Sarah. She has an approval rating of 91% in the latest Rasmussen poll among pary members and nearly 2/3 want her to be the candiate in 2012.
Compare that to the Democratic party. First they thrash Hillary with unfair and sexist invectives. Then they attacked her by dismissing her accomplishments through Obama dismissing her as “likeable enough”. If Barack Obama is the standard bearer of the Democratic party then the supposed party of inclusion has taken a huge step backward.

Posted by: greg | November 8, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

There is a part of me that wants to feel sorry for her. Then, there is the part of me that feels like she is getting what she deserves by not having a grasp of the reality of what she was getting into. What this boils down to is someone who’s “confidence” in herself far outstrips her abilities for the national political stage. She should have said, “Thanks, but no thanks” as the running mate rather than about the bridge. Now I just want her to go away. She is not the face, nor the voice, of the Republican party. She is now damaged goods because she was too full of herself and greedy for celebrity as well as power. Thank goodness this country dodged a bullet. Four years — eight years — they don’t change someone like her.

Posted by: profm2 | November 8, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Corherent sentences weren’t part of the 5 to 6 years of college lessons that’s for sure!

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

No. It’s due to the fact she did little more than read sarcastic speeches.
=====
Perhaps most people voted for BO because they thought Sarah Palin “was not prepared for national politics”. So to avoid a VP who isn’t prepared, they’d rather elect a President who isn’t prepared.
I wasn’t talking about the outcome of the election. I was referring to the psychology of the leftist mind and the hate that is released from it at the mere mention of the name Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Angry Left | November 8, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Let’s compare Sarah Palin with Barack Obama.
Sarah understands that your 401k account belongs to you and that you deserve to keep the money you have added to it over the years.
Barack believes that it is unfair that you do not pay taxes on your contributions. His party also seems to believe that they can simply take your account from you and add it to a communal pool, stripping you of your accumulated wealth. Oh, and by the way, if you give up the 10k, 100k, or 300k you have in your account today you only deserve a maximum monthly payout of $600. The rest of your money will be “spread” to those that were not as responsible as you, to those that have refused to work, and to those who failed to plan. Warms your heart doesn’t it? As Obama explained during the primary debates, this isn’t about good policy but rather is about “fairness”.
I will go with the approach Sarah Palin has believes in. I suspect once the American people hear more of this they will not be shy in telling everyone what they think about Barack’s plans to “spread the wealth”.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Maybe Palin thought they said “Africa is incontinent” . ..

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Why didn’t McCain pick a VP who has spend years inside the beltway? Palin doesn’t seem like VP material at this time.

Posted by: eddie | November 8, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Don’t blame Jake for information coming straight out of the Republican campaign organization – you blame that on the Republicans being screw ups.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Curt writes, “Let’s compare Sarah Palin with Barack Obama.”
=====================
(LOL) I damn near spit up my soda.

Posted by: Dems | November 8, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

greg:
as a mam i am for equal treatment of all people male or female, with that said during the sixtys womens lib came about because they wanted to be treated the same as a man so lets drop the word sexist or sexism because when you are running for the same elected office job you should be able to handle the heat male of female

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Thank all that is good about life that Sarah Palin is back in Alaska doing what she does best.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

That was male or female

Posted by: jg5012 | November 8, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

In the interviews I saw with Palin, she came off as one of the most intelligent, knowledgeable individuals on the face of the planet.
Her knowledge of world affairs was encyclopedic, her grace while sliming her opponents was the height of human dignity – her bald-faced lies about the bridge to nowhere, the findings of abuse of power in the first troopergate report . . . all of these show the traits of a great 1990′s sleazy politician.
Too bad its 2008.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Dems,
Have you read anything on what the Democrats are planning to do in regards to 401k accounts? Do you really believe taxes should be levied against 401k contributions? Do you really believe the best interest of the American people will be served when Obama and the Democrats confiscate the money people have struggled to save for their retirement and add it to a fund that can then be raided for general budget needs, including failed social programs.
Yes, I compared Sarah to Barack and when the details of this plan are presented to the American people they will conclude as I have – Barack Obama’s simply does not measure up.
Please read about the plan being hatched by Democrats to effectively kill 401k accounts. Simply search Y@hoo for “Democrats 401k” and you will find several links that will help you decide if you prefer Sarah or Barack.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Curt:
Regarding taxation:
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This includes RECORD overspending.
Where did the Republicans think this money was going to come from? The moon?
From 7/11 and Macdonalds workers?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Some words of advice to Sarah Palin from a former mayor who got slimed by so-called friends in her own campaign: Better go back to being unavailable for comment vs. complaining about unfair treatment. No one really wants to hear it out here in Middle Class America and it just gives your enemies good sound bites to use against you in the future. I did not vote for McCain/Palin and hated the mud-slinging you did at your rallies. If you learned anything during your campaign, let it be to concentrate on facts and be a lady.

Posted by: Colorado Dem | November 8, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Jake, I have a serious question for you as a journalist. Is it the job of the MSM to merely report what is said or is it to get to the bottom of something and report the facts?
The reason I ask the question is because Sarah Palin has been dogged by rumors and innuendos since McCain announced that she was his running mate. Starting with Labor Day weekend, websites such as the HuffingtonPost and DailyKos absolutely trounced her with scathing articles and lies about her baby, her life, her beliefs, etc.
I am by no means saying that Palin is perfect. But what concerns me is that a group of anonymous people dictated the opinion of this women by going to other websites and spreading false and distorted information about her. It was done so much that now many people believe these things as fact.
The internet is a powerful tool but it can be used for bad as well as good. Who is going to be the one to stand up to these websites and call them on the carpet for their behavior? Who is going to have enough guts enough to tell these ‘anonymous’ bloggers that what they are doing is not ethical or fair?
I rejoice in the results of this election but am uncomfortable with the fact that it wasn’t won fair and square. What is to stop these people from behaving the same way again, especially when it worked so well this time?

Posted by: mak | November 8, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

That’s Right Pefros.
Bill Clinton left the nation is pretty good financial shape – surplus all around. George W. came in and squandered it all and left us with a huge national debt.
This includes trillions a month spent in Iraq and now this $700 billion buyout package. Somebody has to pay for it. We all will, no matter how much we make or what our socio/econmis status is. Obama is a good man to even Want To take on this task. He has my support.

Posted by: RubyRed Republican | November 8, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Hey Curt:
The sheeple don’t care about the truth . . . look who they elected! . . . Will Nobama raise taxes on the wealthy . . . No – I think not . . Why because he’s wealthy! . . . The sheeple were so caught up in electing the “Change Platform” that they failed to see the true intent of the message . . . Well as they say on the streets:
“Let the buyer beware!” . . .
“You get what you pay for!” . . .
And “A wolf in sheep’s clothing is still a wolf” . . . .
America – and the rest of the world for that matter – are at the edge of a massive, world-wide, financial failure and tax and spend economics is not what the world needs . . . One doesn’t have to Look far back in history to find the Greeks, Roman’s, German’s, Ottoman’s, French, English, Dutch, etc., etc., etc., to see examples of superpowers that fell to their internal greed, perversity, over-extension, and failure to recognize the cold, hard truth before their eyes . . . Why do we think that the United State is immune? . . . History proves differently . . .

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I’ll give Sarah Palin this: she is most definitely smarter than those who supported her, but she isn’t smarter than a smart person.

Posted by: humunculus | November 8, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

So 64% of Republicans want Sarah to run in 2012.
And Republicans now make up 45% of the electorate.
That means should should get a whopping 28% of the 2012 vote.
RUN SARAH RUN!!!
LOL

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I wonder what portion of that 64% of Republicans want her to run with Joe the Plumber as her VP …
LOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

so democratic administrations do a bang up job-bill clinton brought shame to the office of the presidency, the dem party, and the nation. other notable DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTS in recent history jimmy carter who was even denied a podium at the dem convention for his views on palestine, again shamed the party with his extreme leftist views. and then jfk a womanizer…who did a bang up job as well.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Hearing this lady talk just confirms that America make the right choice choosing Obama/Biden over mccain with his disasterous VP pick.

Posted by: pt | November 8, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

History just seems to repeat itself. The democrats had to clean up the mess that hoover created and now Obama will need to clean up the mess the bush league created.

Posted by: pt | November 8, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Hey northernlights – you forgot Lyndon Johnson who lied bold faced to the American public, escalated us into Viet Nam, and then left the mess for Nixon to clean up . . . If you ask me – the democrats have an excellent track record – of messing up this country . . . .

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Leave her alone to keep drilling and grilling.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | November 8, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

sarah was not spreading rumors. she was expressing the truth. obama’s friends and associates are shady criminals and terrorists. except for wright who only hates america and what it stands for. those were not rumors, their words and actions are facts not fiction.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

You dems need to show some respect to the VP nominee…the same kind of respect you want the republicans to show your neophyte of a president elect….Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are already showing little respect to him by having press conferences before Obama is even in office…nice party unity there….Palin may not be as sophisticated or verbose in her speeches as Obama is ..but at least when she makes a point..you don;t end up scratching your head trying to figure out what she actually said…unlike Obama who has mastered the art of saying nothing beautifully…Obama is the king of generalities and platitudes…he got elected on a dream and a prayer…not on any real record of accomplishment.
Good luck to us all.

Posted by: Truthteller | November 8, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Has she actually returned all the clothes that she bought for herself, her family, and husband?
If not, where are the clothes now? Will she have to pay tax on them?

Posted by: Suzanne | November 8, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Again the Obama-cans wouldn’t know the truth if it bit them! . . . Its their job to follow blindly, as good sheeple do, and not question the past of their savior Nobama . . . If we knew the truth about his past they would only choose to ignore it . . . Just like the followers of the last messiah Bill Clinton – know there’s the walking definition of corruption and scandal . . . His catch phrase was “Now this is what I’m going to do for you!” . . . Just like the car salesman in cheep suit that he is . . . Well America you bought Nobama’s lies so I hope you’re willing to pay for that dance . . . Good luck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Suzanne: Why are you so concerned about Palin’s clothing. And who cares what she did with it. Its none of the public’s business its the business of the RNC. And if they gave her 500,000 I wouldn’t care. This campaign was about the economy, taxes and social security not someone’s clothes.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

I like Paline.
As far as democrats opinion of her being a moron and a nut,I don’t care!!
If there is a republican who is popular,the Dems will “hate” that person.
I have voted for every party in the last 30 yrs.But I have not and never will vote for a democrat.They have tunnel vision and it is only about winning.They will manipulate and lie to get what they want.
You got your man elected and have the house and senate…… Just shut up watch them cut each others throats:>

Posted by: jon jonsson | November 8, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

pt: Obama is no Bill Clinton and he may never clean up the mess but make a bigger one. He needs advisors that are more educated than him because he is no way experienced to run this country. And neither can Biden. I am waiting for the blunders to happen and they will happen. Emanuel and Pelosi will eventually get into it somehow because Pelosi wants power. If he chooses Bill Richardson or John Kerry for secretary of state I think he has lost it all.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | November 8, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Where oh where is Joe The Plumber these days?
Where oh where has he gone?
ROFLMAO

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Governor Palin=Alaska the ONLY recession proof state in the union.
Governor Palin the most popular Gov in the U.S.

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Someone wrote:
So 64% of Republicans want Sarah to run in 2012.
And Republicans now make up 45% of the electorate.
That means should should get a whopping 28% of the 2012 vote.
RUN SARAH RUN!!!
———-
I think 100% of Democrats want her to run.

Posted by: fuzzback | November 8, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Hmmmmm! John Kerry as secretary of state . . . Now there’s an oxymoron (or just moron) who couldn’t fight his way out of a wet paper sack . . . God help this country . . . .

Posted by: lost in the United Socialist States of America | November 8, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

so 64% of republicans support a palin presidential bid in 2012 4 years ahead of an election-and before she even announces.
and that does not include democrats like myself, or independents.
incredible…

Posted by: northernlights | November 8, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

RUN SARAH RUN!!!
AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Still no Democrats willing to step up and defend the Democratic Party and Barack Obama’s plans to tax 401k contributions? Still no one willing to explain why the American people should be happy to give up their existing 401k plans by “donating” (read having them stolen) their money to a government run pool? Shouldn’t all of us sheeple just be happy that Obama will “spread our wealth” to those that don’t work, those that abuse government programs, and those who show simple irresponsibility by failing to plan for their retirement? Of course, if the Democrats get away with this it will certainly teach those of us that have taken our responsibility seriously, won’t it?
Sarah Palin has the intelligence to recognize the Democratic Party plans for our 401k’s for the shameful, dishonest power grab that it is. Barack Obama-not so much. Beliefs and core principles mean something. When a candidate comes before the American people, as Barack Obama has, and declares he is a “blank screen” that people can draw their own beliefs onto, we should all be concerned what he truly believes. If the 401k plans are representative of Obama’s philosophy we are in for a very long four years.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Curt: “Do you really believe the best interest of the American people will be served when Obama and the Democrats confiscate the money people have struggled to save for their retirement and add it to a fund that can then be raided for general budget needs, including failed social programs.”
Right, and President Bush wants to take all male babies at age 7 to be trained as soldiers. You’re not getting any responses because you’re posting delusional fantasies.
As for the elimination of the tax shelter, folks survived prior to the 401k being created by a Democratic Congress under President Carter, so even if your delusions of it being eliminated came to pass life would go on. And as has been pointed out, something has to be done to deal with the enormous debt the Republicans have run up. It’s eliminate the Pentagon or take some serious slashes at entitlements (and the 401k tax exemption is simply a white-collar entitlement program).

Posted by: jhw539 | November 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Sarah Palin is intelligent enough to see the truth in Ronald Reagan’s words; “I think the best possible social program is a job”.
She is intelligent enough to know that the pursuit of perfection through the imperfect mechanism’s of government is simply irresponsible.
Sarah Palin knows that the distribution of wealth is a burden upon the free spirit of our human nature.
Sarah Palin is intelligent enough to know that you cannot simultansously punish productivity and promote it.
Barack Obama believes that, in the name of fairness, we should aspire to “spread the wealth”.

Posted by: James | November 8, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Mariann, why do you want Obama to fail so bad. Why would you not wish him to do well. We all have a stake in this country and your attitude baffles me.

Posted by: Just Wondering | November 8, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“…seemed unaware that Africa is a continent…”
————————-
Who turns this into an anonymous attack? God only knows the actual conversation that went on. If someone had ever asked her: “Is Africa a continent?” I’m 100% certain her answer would be “yes.” How lame for the campaign not to take resposibility. …such petty insults.

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

jhw539,
I am not the one who is proposing the attack on our 401k plans. If you were interested in understanding what, who, and why Democrats are proposing this all you have to do is go to y@hoo and search for “Democrats 401k”. You will see several links that quote the Democrats that are promoting this, including seemingly supporting words from Democratic party leaders. It is strange that you end your post by saying, in essence, that even if it is true we will survive. Well, that is not the point. I don’t want to just “survive”, I want to know that if I work hard and save for my retirement that the Democrats are not going to swoop in and change the rules mid-stream. How can you possibly apologize this away? I understand wanting to support your party, and even wanting to support your choice for president, however; bad policies CAN win passage if there are enough people who are willing to give up their freedom and property. If you would like to research the issue and then give me a reason why we should not be frightened that this has even entered the realm of possibilities then I would be glad to debate the issue with you.
I know I could trust Sarah Palin to reject this form of government intrusion into our lives. With Barack Obama’s stated intention to “spread the wealth” I doubt that he would act in my best interest or the best interest of the American public at large.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Thank god this Sarah Palin thing is over.

Posted by: keredte | November 8, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Something was probably said on the fly. Let’s face reality here: Palin is governor of a state with 80-90% approval rating and she brought a company back from the brink. If she was as dumb as the picture that her enemies are trying to create, then she could never have accomplished what she has in her life. I’m sick of this pettiness. Americans appear to be the dumb ones, believing everything they hear. You wan’t to hear a real joke: Tina Fey as a governor. Come on people, use your heads. The media had a bone to pick with Palin, and in reality, she is quite capable.

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

“Palin is governor of a state with 80-90% approval rating “….of a state that re-elected a guy they KNEW was going ot jail. am i supposed to be impressed that these folks were satisfied with her?

Posted by: matt | November 8, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

It shows what terrible shape the Republicans are in that they attack their own. It feels a lovely relief they’re no longer in power.
And who knows how many of the Republican insider attacks on Palin are true?
We do know Palin lied about the bridge to nowhere and lied about the findings of the first troopergate report – who’s to know the truth of these recent allegations.
I notice she’s spending most of the time criticizing those who ‘outed’ her, and and making much less effective efforts denying the accusations.
I suppose we’ll find out in time.
Messy business the Republicans cooked up for themselves with this nomination and the infighting.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

in reality, she is quite capable..in reality, she has no education, she never brought any company from the brink of anything – pure fiction. In both her stint as mayor and governor she hired someone to essentiall do her job, which was very EASY if you consider all the hired help she had. She odesn’t even collect taxes for
God’s sake, she went overbudget constantly and she hired city managers and laywers and everyone under the sun to essentially do everything WHILE education, healthcare and other issues she never addressed.

Posted by: frank | November 8, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Michael, I never heard that Palin released her college records. If she had I am sure it would have been all over the news. Good try though – NOT. Pathetic….
Sarah Palin is intelligent enough to know that if you try the same thing over and over again (Socialism) and expect a different result, that is indeed the definition of insanity. Barack Obama does not seem to have been able to absorb this lesson. His arrogance has convinced him that if only HE is the one that implements it then it will all work out and we will live in paradise. Well, not quite. Socoalism is corrosive, it eats away at productivity and efficency, it eats away at the soul of the people under its power, and it produces a privileged class that is based on birth and party affiliation, rather than on hard work and inate ability.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

“And that’s cruel, it’s mean-spirited, it’s immature, it’s unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away with it taking things out of context, then tried to spread something on national news. It’s not fair, it’s not right.”
Isn’t this exactly what Palin & McCain did to Obama…took things Obama said out of context in order to fuel their negative campaigns……..hey Sarah, what goes around comes around!

Posted by: Molly | November 8, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

“in reality, she is quite capable..in reality, she has no education, she never brought any company from the brink of anything – pure fiction. In both her stint as mayor and governor she hired someone to essentiall do her job, which was very EASY if you consider all the hired help she had. She odesn’t even collect taxes for
God’s sake, she went overbudget constantly and she hired city managers and laywers and everyone under the sun to essentially do everything WHILE education, healthcare and other issues she never addressed.”
—————————–
I find it amazing that you feel justified in making the above comments when Alaska is one of the few states left with a strong economy. Apparently, she has done everything “wrong” yet everything is going right. At the same time, Granholm and Obama “think alike” and Granholm has a 10% approval rating with Michigan having the worst economy of all the states. Americans are so so blind. You trust leaders who can’t produce and attack the ones who prove themselves by thier actions. Go ahead, follow your “wise” ones to your own demise.

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

“And that’s cruel, it’s mean-spirited, it’s immature, it’s unprofessional and those guys are jerks if they came away with it taking things out of context, then tried to spread something on national news. It’s not fair, it’s not right.”
Isn’t this exactly what Palin & McCain did to Obama…took things Obama said out of context in order to fuel their negative campaigns……..hey Sarah, what goes around comes around!
————————————-
yes Molly!

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

I love it. Republicans and their secret conspiracy theories.
OBAMA IS A SECRET MUSLIM.
PALIN IS A SECRET GENIUS.
ROTFLMAO!!!

Posted by: R Mutt | November 8, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Well, “Curt,” it’s now very apparent that something in our economy has been “corrosive,” has eaten away at productivity and efficency, has eaten away at the soul of the people, and has produced a privileged class (some might say “super-privileged.)
And that something, my friend, was clearly NOT socialism.
Unrestrained capitalism has repeatedly been proven just as dangerous, if not more.

Posted by: fuzzback | November 8, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I pretty much saw through Palin when she began bragging about how she had been the champion of stopping the bridge to nowhere.
We all now know it was actually congress who stopped the bridge by cutting off funding, and that once the funding was gone Palin decided not to support the bridge, but kept all the earlier money dedicated to her bridge.
So she wasn’t stamping out the foolish earmark, she just tagged along when the writing was on the wall – and she kept the taxpayers’ money.
That spoke volumes about her ethics.

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I never accused Gov. Palin of being stupid. I just never thought she was vice presidential or certainly presidential material. There is a difference. It’s like someone who just earned a bachelor’s degree in fine arts applying for a CEO position at a Fortune 500 company. She’s probably a pretty good governor though. Now I hope I don’t hear about her again.

Posted by: em | November 8, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

And “Mike” – are you not aware that Alaska is the most socialist of states? I mean, which other state hands out $3000 plus to each man, woman and child, just for breathing? Alaska wouldn’t make it without massive federal aid and subsidies.
Sheesh, what hypocracy.

Posted by: fuzzback | November 8, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Curt:
Regarding taxation:
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
This includes RECORD overspending.
Where did the Republicans think this money was going to come from? The moon?
From 7/11 and Macdonalds workers?

Posted by: pefros | November 8, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

“And “Mike” – are you not aware that Alaska is the most socialist of states? I mean, which other state hands out $3000 plus to each man, woman and child, just for breathing? Alaska wouldn’t make it without massive federal aid and subsidies.
Sheesh, what hypocracy.”
————————
Giving all tax payers similar amounts of money back is not socialist. That’s good governing, considering that the money is available to give. Socialism is taking money from one group and giving it to another regardless of the surplus/deficit.

Posted by: Mike | November 8, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

I would really like to view Palin’s college transcripts. All of them from all the schools she attended over those 6 years that she sought her higher education and her 4 year degree. What courses did she take and what grades did she earn? Considering the schools she attended it is likely that she was above the bottom 5% of her class. That would put her above McCain who was in the bottom 5% of his class. Come to think of it, we don’t need to see Palin’s grades. McCain was just being himself when he picked Palin as his VP. He said he picked her because “she was the one who reminded him most of himself.”

Posted by: Bert K. | November 8, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Fuzzback,
I would argue that our government has indeed become more Socialistic in its approach. And yes, some of that happened under Republican administrations. More concerning however is the extremly fast pace of supposed “enlightened change” under Carter and especially LBJ. Subsequent administrations have found their flexibility in dealing with changes in our society increasingly hampered by the mandates that flowed from them. I simply do not believe that we can afford one more giant leap toward utopian socialism under Obama. Indeed, I don’t believe America can survive one more round of this sickness that will add tens of thousands to the non-productive class.
Heck, today nearly 40 percent of the American people pay no taxes. The answer to this is not an even faster capitualtion to these failed policies. Obama is promising just such an approach – it is foolhardy.

Posted by: Cutr | November 8, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Bertk, check with Michael, he seems to be the only person besides Sarah herself that has them…(snicker….)
Sarah Palin is intelligent enough to know that you cannot simultaneously create an environment where your supporters think you are going to “pay for their gas” and their “rent” and still instill a sense of self sufficiency that will lift everyone. Barack Obama seems to think that HE (and only HE) can pull it off. Pride does indeed come before the fall.

Posted by: Curt | November 8, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

cincyr – I too am wondering why McCain isn’t coming to her defense – hmmmm…. perhaps because he knows this is all true? To James, who posted that the left only attacks those that threaten them – I’ll agree that both parties attack when threatened and she does threaten me. She is a danger to everthing I hold dear and an insult to all intelligent women. She is ignorant, against the rights of women and children(she is against abortion even in the case of children being raped), and a complete danger to our nation’s economy & security. She gives her high school educated first dude husband control of way too many aspects of her government. HE has no business near any aspect of government and he needs to stop playing around all year as a fisherman and dog sledder and take care of their handicapped child. Damn right she is a threat. I love this country and respect myself and my daughter way too much to ever support any ticket she is on. And don’t come back and say she is a popular governor – the Republicans in Alaska proved themselves incompetent by re-electing Ted Stevens. (Sorry to those of you that didn’t). The funny thing is – I am a moderate and I have voted for Republicans on quite a few occassions but I will NEVER support a dangerously ignorant extremist like Palin – give me a Reagan-type and I might look twice but NEVER someone like her. She is a threat – she’d destroy us with her stupidity.

Posted by: allier | November 8, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

May I ask for a clarification on how Palin was “overbudget” even though she was able to give Alaska taxpayers $3000 back out of a surplus and the Alaskan economy is stronger than ever? It sounds like the budget cap was in need of adjustment. When the American economy is in shambles via Obama/Granholm rationality, just watch the people move to Alaska in groves!

Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

CC,
No woman will become president if it is left to the Democrats. Certainly, no woman will become president if it is left to Barack Obama. He truly seems to have a problem with women. His attacks on Hillary and Sarah were mean, vindictive, arrogant, and down right sexist. He dismisses their accomplishments and doesn’t have the courage to take them on himself. He trots female surrogates out to take pot shots at them and feeds the most vile invectives about them to his friends in the press. All the while he hides from directly addressing them like a man.
Have heart though, I firmly believe that Republicans will break this final hurdle for women by nominating and electing Sarah Palin! After four years of failed socialism under Obama America will finally be ready to get over its issues with women.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

There will come a time (sooner than later) when we will look at Alaska and wish that the rest of America was doing as well. Check out which states are in recession, going to be in recesssion, or have a growing economy. You’ll find that Alaska is becoming a quick minority in being a state with a strong economy. I find the proof of leadership to be in the fruits that a leader produces. A talker is not a leader.

Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Mike, great point. Over the next four years we can compare how well Sarah Palin is doing in Alask versus how ahh… well Barack Obama is doing in the lower 48.
I will put my money on Sarah – she will succeed. As for Obama, he lied and our economy is going to die! (could’t help but putting one of the leftists favorite sayings in there. You betcha…)

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Curt you’re to be discounted on any rational basis.
“His (Obama’s) attacks on Hillary and Sarah were mean, vindictive, arrogant, and down right sexist.”
Sorry pal, you’re just making this stuff up. I saw no attacks AT ALL from Obama on Palin.
You do however accurately describe the attacks by Palin and McCain on Obama.
Get real.
Dismissed.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I totally agree with Palin’s comments. It’s sad she even has to comment to such immature stupidity.
I think she’s great!
PALIN!!! For our first woman president!!!!

Posted by: Coffee | November 9, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

And in case you fellows have missed it, Alaska is FILTHY RICH with oil.
Of course they’ll do okay.
They also received RECORD EARMARKS per capita from the federal government under Palin.
Wasn’t there something a touch hypocrital about her claims to be anti-earmark while she was stuffing her Alaskan coffers?
It’s the ethical side of Palin that concerns me – something is missing.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

And now it seems the strongest attacks on Palin are coming from within the REPUBLICAN campaign itself.
The Republicans are so vicious attack oriented they even attack each other in a nasty way.
Live with it suckers.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

If a women runs for high office she will be RIDICULED by the male dominated media. See what happened to Hillary and Palin. No matter what political sway women exposed they will be RIDICULED.

Posted by: CC | November 9, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Seriously CC – how sad it is when sexists within the REPUBLICAN campaign are attacking Palin for being ignorant, clothes hog, overspender and so on.
Just terrible sexist REPUBLICAN attacks on a woman. And when she’s down after a HUGE defeat by the electorate.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Paline for President what a Joke.She can get Joe the Plumber as her vp pick.If Paline runs for President .Obama will an even more Victory . Then he did Over McSame so by all means Run Sarah Run, Run Sarah.

Posted by: KWOLF443 | November 9, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

pefros,
I read your comments and undersood them just fine. The mistreatment of Hillary just hits closer to home for the liberal leaning crowd on this site.
However, if you want an example of Barack Obama’s attacks on Sarah Palin I will provide one. David Axelrod, campaign manager for Barack Obama, had a direct relationship with Mr. Winner, who produced the intial hit piece video about Sarah Palin. This video attacked her for supposedly not being the mother of her own Down’s Syndrome baby (truly sick and sexist), attacked her by raising the question of whether she could have a career and raise her children at the same time (again – sexist – and has no place in American politics), and made numerous other allegations of a very personal nature. You can research the ties between Obama and Mr. Winner through Michele Malkin and Howard Kurtz articles. This shows just how big of a thug and coward Obama is. He hides behind others and lobs grenades at women while he avoids direct attacks so he can later pout when the women he targets decide to fight back. If any women doubt what I say about Obama wait until you see the final makeup of the Obama cabinet. It will be overwhelmingly male. Obama is clearly not a friend of women and seems to have some weird antagonism toward them

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Sorry Curt, I don’t believe a word you say. You’ve already discredited yourself in my eyes with your far-fetched attacks.
The attacks from within the REPUBLICAN party on Palin as documented above – the accusations she is ignorant, a clothes hog, overspender and so on . . .
These are appalling and typical of what all the electorate saw during the campaign as a common REPUBLICAN tactic.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

and….she eats with that mouthZ? Wittless in Wasillia needs to just stay up there with people stupid enough to put Stevens back in the Senate! LOL Talk about real cream of the crop. A virtual liar and a thief. What a state.

Posted by: Grissom | November 9, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Mariann Pepitone
Are we talking about intelligence or change? Stick to the subject. By far the general consenses is that Obama is intelligent. This isn’t my opinion, but that of many from both the right and left. You don’t know what you are talking about…

Posted by: unshrub | November 9, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Sarah Palin lied about the plane and ebay, she lied about the bridge to no where and she lied about her experience and now anyone with a brain thinks she is “now” telling the truth? LOL Buy a freaking clue! or another brain cell because the ONE you have is getting lonely.

Posted by: Grissom | November 9, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

pefros,
Sorry but you attempt to misdirect the mistreatment of women away from Obama will fail. There are exactly two people linked to the McCain campaign that have made negative comments about Palin. There are tens of thousands in the Democratic party, including Obama, who continue to play on sexism to dismiss women such as Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton.
CC – don’t give up hope. 91% percent of the Republican party have a favorable view of Sarah Palin, a percentage that rivals their support for Ronald Reagan. Sarah is a strong, capable, charismatic leader – the fact that she is also a woman will not limit her chances of success in the Republican party.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

You missed the point again Curt – this ATTACK on Palin came from within the REPUBLICAN campaign itself.
The Republicans know no other approach other than fear and smear, so they’re now smearing their woman candidate.
It’s very sad and it’s a very bad example for people all over America.
Of course, Palin may deserve it – we just don’t know the truth because she has lied so easily during the campaign.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

it was the ivy league educated top of the class insider fat cats that brought our economy to the brink of collapse.
for me i will take plain talk sarah palin’s common sense anyday of the week with a record of success in governing the only state (alaska) in the union that is recession proof.
now lets see if obama can recession proof the rest of us.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

pefros,
Obama embraced sexism and dismissiveness and American women paid the price.
It is a sad commentary that no matter how many examples we produce such as the stories an Palin’s baby and attacks on her balancing motherhood and a career, the left will still defend those in the Obama campaign that made the attacks. It is truly sickening…Sarah Palin stated it best in her statement to the press when she got back to Alaska. She said that girls will need to work harder and they had better study harder because the will be subjected to a different standard. The reporter that was covering the event finally admitted what we should all have known – the treatment that was directed toward Palin will have an impact on women beyond her. He was particularly concerned about the world his own daughter would grow up in.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

One of my favorite Palin lies during the campaign occurred when the first Troopergate Report.
That report found she abused the power of her office when she and ‘the first dude’ made repeated attempts using her office and resources to try to get her ex-brother-in-law fired.
The next day she went on national media and said the report ‘completely cleared her of any abuse of power’. It was a direct, bald-faced lie.
It’s not just her mental faculties and experience that trouble me, it’s the nature of her ‘ethics’.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

People who can’t spell or use capital letters, periods, commas, or punctuation marks correctly shouldn’t call Sarah Palin, or anyone else, stupid!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 9, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

“Obama embraced sexism and dismissiveness and American women paid the price.”
Again Curt, it appears you’re willing to just lie in order to make your points.
What REAL evidence we have points directly to repeated ATTACKS on Palin from with the REPUBLICAN campaign – attacks that say she was ignorant, a clothes hog, an overspender and so on . …
Perhaps you should be condemning these documented attacks on Palin from within her own REPUBLICAN campaign.
Who are we to believe? Palin or the REPUBLICAN campaign?
Either way its’ a bit of a disgraceful mess for the REPUBLICANS.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

pefros: I remind you that Sarah Palin might have violated some ethics but she broke no laws! She’s not a criminal!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 9, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

carlyonsue some people are not good at spelling or punctuation, but it does not mean they are stupid, nor does it mean they can’t think their way through an argument.
But I think you know that.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Ridiculed all women seeking higher office, that’s the mantra practice by both the male dominated Democratic and Republican leaderships.

Posted by: CC | November 9, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

sarah gets more media than obama, mccain, and biden and she lost, that is hysterical.
i love the libs getting all twisted and consumed by their hate, fear, sexism and intolerance.
so much for change, the purveyors of love, peace and tolerance are hate mongers.
good night, seek some therapy, hate will consume you.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Is is the same woman who called Hilary a whiner back in March? who’s whining now? Come on Sarah stop whining, you entered the big boys’ game via extreme ambition and an empty brain, you enjoyed playing with the big boys, you prided yourself being nastier than the big boys now suck it up. They have just started with you. You saw what they did to Obama through you for getting in their way. Brace yourself up for what they are gone to do to you for going rogue and messing up their party and plans. Did somebody say the democratic party was not unified back in June? Hmmmm. who’s barking at each other now

Posted by: yoye777 | November 9, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

hahaha northern lights . ..
It’s people from within the REPUBLICAN campaign who were attacking Palin. Take a look at the article this blog is based on – it was the Republicans attacking Palin.
Sheesh.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

at least the republicans nominated a woman. the democrats on the other hand rejected the most qualified by far female candidate ever…in our history.
hmmm looking forward to a hillary verus sarah 2012 let’s see what the sexists do then- will they vote nader? lol…

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

OBAMANATION:
Do you honestly think Obama isn’t intelligent enough to be President? If you are, you are in the very small minority, even for republicans. You don’t get to the top of Harvard Law School by being average. Palin has to prove herself. And if you don’t understand that, maybe Palin is smarter than you are.
Posted by: unshrub | Nov 8, 2008 3:15:36 PM
I know Governor Palin is smarter than me. I don’t know if she is smarter than you since I don’t know you personally.
As for schools, President Bush attended Yale. Obama attended Harvard. People accuse Bush of getting admitted to Yale through family connections. People accuse Obama of getting admitted to Harvard through affirmative action. Draw your own conclusions.
As for John McCain (Obama did run against McCain, remember?) he admits he was near the bottom of his class in the Nacval Academy. I think his five years in a cell in Hanoi earned him a School of Hard Knocks degree. Obama’s school records are under wraps meanwhile. Why?
Besides, lets not get too caught up in academic records or our perceptions of politician’s intelliegnce. Harry Truman, one of the least educated President all time, is considerd by many to be one of the greatest Presidents of the twentieth century. Richard Nixon, meanwhile, was widely considerd to be extremely intelligent, yet is derided by the bulk of historians (fairly or not).
To get an interesting view on Presidents, Vice Presidents and their intelligence, search the Saturday Night Live section of the NBC website for a skit featuring Bill Hartman as President Reagan and how Reagan was an amiable grandfatherly figure for the cameras but a brrillain mastermind (including speaking fluent Chinese) behind the scenes. It was funny as heck and maybe, just maybe, had a whiff of truth to it.

Posted by: OBAMANATION [uh-bom-uh-NEY-shuhn] | November 9, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

The point is that women will never be President of this country..The leadership of both Democrats and Republicans are male dominated and unwilling to accept a female as commander in chief..Just pay attention..Hillary and Sarah were ridiculed and dismissed.
The male dominated media takes the sexist attitudes prevalent among our leaders in Washington and FINISHED ALL WOMEN OFF.

Posted by: CC | November 9, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Unbelievable! Even in the wake of an Obama victory the mainstream media cannot resist their pathological urge to savagely attack Sarah Palin. If even 1/10th of the attention focused upon Governor Palin’s wardrobe were devoted now to the unethical methods the Obama campaign utilized to accept nearly $300 million worth of credit card donations of less than $200 each, I’d be completely fascinated.
Come on, Jake, why haven’t you reported on that?!

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 9, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

: pefros we noticed. it is not the article i respond to, it is the comments on this blog who turned it into a nasty vile mud fight.
look many of us, family and friends were ready to move on and give obama a chance but these nasty comments against sarah will no go without challenge.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

northernlights I’m pretty sure the McCain brain trust selection of a woman was a cynical, desperate attempt to attempt to compete with what the Republicans knew was a very strong Democratic Obama campaign.
There were other much more experienced Republican women who would have been far better suited to be ‘a heartbeat away from the presidency’, but they were cynically shunned in favor of the ‘catchy looking flavor of the moment’.
That was sad to me. I can imagine how those accomplished Republican women felt, and one day they might speak out about their treatment.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Even women hate to see another women seek higher office..they hated Hillary and Sarah..Why? they don’t want to upset their men.

Posted by: US | November 9, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

There are a couple of brilliant women currently in Obama’s circle of advisors. Women who look pretty well placed to possibly run for President in the future.
They are Kathleen Sebelius and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Why isn’t the main stream media including ABC NEWS investigating and reporting about the OBVIOUS voter /ballot discrepencies in the November 4 election in Alaska?

Posted by: Betty | November 9, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Kathleen Sebelius and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz are Obama surrogates. Watch Obama’s cabinet nominations, they will conveniently be passed over rather than offered a chance to actually participate in governance. They played their role by taking Sarah Palin to task for the Obama campaign, but Obama will not reciprocate by invitig them to join his cabinet. Prove me wrong – I will gladly recant my statement if you can convince Obama to actually include women in the important roles within leadership. It ain’t going to happen.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

pefros wrote:
There are a couple of brilliant women currently in Obama’s circle of advisors. Women who look pretty well placed to possibly run for President in the future.
They are Kathleen Sebelius and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
Just wait for the mainstream media to ridiculed and dismissed these women just like they did it to Hillary and Palin. THEY WILL MAKE NO EXEMPTIONS.

Posted by: US | November 9, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

pefros i disagree with you. sarah appeals to HER base. that is why 4 years ahead of a national campaign and before she has even announced her intentions she leads (out polls) all other republican candidates for potus by HUGE margins.
she is the most popular governor in the unions.
alaska is the ONLY recession proof state in the u.s. she is competent, young, and driven to excel as she has in all she has undertaken. actions verus flowery speeches work for me.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Well Curt, who are you recommending to Obama as having the proper experience?

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

northernlights I have no doubt you support Palin, I’m just stating my opinion she was a cynical choice by McCain’s brain trust.
There were far more qualified and accomplished women in the Republican party who might have been ready to be ‘a heartbeat away from the presidency’ – just nobody as ‘catchy’ as Palin – the ‘Maverick’ who lied about championing stopping the bridge to nowhere.
We’ll see what happens when these overlooked Republican women start to speak as the distance from the election increases.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Pefros,
The two you mentioned would be fine. Governor Napolitano would also be a good choice. But my point is that I believe Obama will nominate very few women, and none to high level posts. There really is some dissonance between Obama and women. He has no close advisors (Michele does not count)that are female and he seems to be unconcerned about how the blueprints for personal destruction he created to destroy Hillary and Sarah will be used against other women.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

McCain needs to stop his “I admire her, she’s great” blah blah and tell us more about his VP selection. If he is a real “maverick” he would accept that he screwed up and explain.

Posted by: jonathanw | November 9, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

: pefros and by the way we are not some fringe sub group we are 42% of the u.s population that supported a republican ticket.
by the way i am a female, hillary supporter, life-long democrat, salad bar catholic, hispanic, mother of a gay son. so trying to paint all sarah’s supporters as right wing, religious based thinking is an inaccurate characterization.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Only 81 days left in the Bush administration!

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

northernlights:
what is a ‘salad bar catholic’? i’ve never heard that term before

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Susan Elizabeth Rice (born November 17, 1964) is an American foreign policy expert. Rice, who is African American, served on the National Security Council and as Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the second Bill Clinton administration, from October 1997 until January 20, 2001. She is currently on leave from the Brookings Institution, serving as a senior foreign policy advisor to Democratic Senator Barack Obama in his 2008 presidential campaign. On November 5th, 2008, Rice was named to the advisory board of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

pefros salad bar catholic means we pick and choose what we accept/practice in our personal lives.
the church would like to deny us communion. think joe biden on abortion for example.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Cassandra Q. Butts is the Senior Vice President for Domestic Policy at the Center for American Progress.[1] She is also on the advisory board for president-elect Barack Obama’s presidential transition team.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Valerie Bowman Jarrett (born November 14, 1956) is a Chicago lawyer, businesswoman, and civic leader. She is a senior advisor to President-Elect Barack Obama and has been named as a co-chairman of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

okay, thanks for the explanation northernlights

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

only 4 years before the obama administration runs for re election tic-toc. lol
and 2 years before we throw all the bums out of congress. tic-toc

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Janet Napolitano (born November 29, 1957) is the current governor of the U.S. state of Arizona, and a member of the Democratic Party, originally elected in 2002 and re-elected in 2006. She is Arizona’s third female governor, and the first woman to win re-election. In November 2005, Time magazine named her one of the five best governors in the U.S. She served as the Chair of the National Governors Association in 2006-2007. In February 2006, Napolitano was named by The White House Project as one of “8 in ’08″, a group of eight female politicians who could possibly run and/or be elected president in 2008. On November 5th, 2008, Napolitano was named to the advisory board of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

pefros we are watching, he better appoint qualified women to high level positions.
heck even gwb has condi rice.
hey you figure hillary vs sarah 2012?
hmmm i would feel like i was cheating on hillary… sarah is more tenacious …

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Jennifer Mulhern Granholm (born February 5, 1959 in Vancouver, British Columbia) is a Canadian-born American politician, former Attorney General of Michigan, and the current Governor of the U.S. state of Michigan. A member of the Democratic Party, Granholm became Michigan’s first female governor on January 1, 2003, when she succeeded Governor John Engler. Granholm was re-elected on November 7, 2006, and was sworn in for her second and, due to term limits, final term on January 1, 2007. She has been mentioned as a potential Supreme Court justice for President-elect Barack Obama.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

: pefros i could go for janet napolitano i lived in phx, i raised my family there.
i went to one of her rally’s for gov she has star power that does not show-up on camera AT ALL, but in person she is dynamic/intellectual/and a heavy hitter.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

northernlights:
Obama has already appointed most of those women to key senior positions in his Transition team.
He’s already way ahead on that count.
The accusations of sexism are far fetched and made up.
Don’t believe the rightwing extremist nonsense.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

To his credit, Obama has taken – and is taking – advice from VERY accomplished women. He picks pretty much only the best of all types.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

transition team appointments are not permanant, but we will see.
i want to see a woman in a cabinet position.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

: pefros i also would like to see more hispanics appointed by the obama administration. richardson is not representational of hispanics. many of us see him as a carpet bagger who moved to new mexico from california due to hisp population numbers and an opportunist who stabbed hillary in the back. hispanics love the clintons we won’t forget. and hispanics did not support him in the primary election we supported hillary.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

Transition Senior Staff:
Chris Lu – Executive Director
Dan Pfeiffer – Communications Director
Stephanie Cutter – Chief Spokesperson
Cassandra Butts – General Counsel
Jim Messina – Personnel Director
Patrick Gaspard – Associate Personnel Director
Christine Varney – Personnel Counsel
Melody Barnes – Co-Director of Agency Review
Lisa Brown – Co-Director of Agency Review
Phil Schiliro – Director of Congressional Relations
Michael Strautmanis – Director of Public Liaison and Intergovernmental Affairs
Katy Kale – Director of Operations
Brad Kiley – Director of Operations

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

northernlights:
Do you have any idea who the strong hispanic candidates are for cabinet positions?

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

: pefros goodnight for now.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Of course, there are not just cabinet posts, but many other important positions as well . .

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

buenos noches northernlights

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Mac i really am sorry about that comment much earlier in the day. i was reacting to the hateful comments about sarah. i defended hillary as well. i am sick of women being smeared.
i really am willing to give obama a chance. we will see. he has great challenges ahead and will need support. goodnight, God bless.

Posted by: northernlights | November 9, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Popele, what a shame! We just elected president, and You are writing nasty things about him and calling names.
Enough.
You, Americans, just got the President, than be American and behave with respect.
Neither one of you went so high, so – shut up and help him to makle this country better and push it forward.
As for Palin – this poor creature has not enough brains even at HS level, BUT why all these started , then this team lost????
Shame on you, people, who fooled the Nation, how Great this Monster was, untill the moment, when McCain lost. Shame on you!.
If McCain would win – Nation would never know, how stupid she was?
Leave her alone, let her find her way.

Posted by: Linda | November 9, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

I am waiting for the ‘REAL’ fun to begin. As former Bush/Cheney cohorts in arms start creeping out of the woodwork, with macabre tales of untold excesses by Bush/Cheney neo-cons and the shameful shenanigans of looting and plunder this administration indulged in.

Posted by: Mac | November 9, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

Mac i really am sorry about that comment much earlier in the day. i was reacting to the hateful comments about sarah. i defended hillary as well. i am sick of women being smeared.i really am willing to give obama a chance. we will see. he has great challenges ahead and will need support. goodnight, God bless.
Posted by: northernlights | Nov 9, 2008 3:23:24 AM.
————————————
Apology accepted, sweetheart,good night, I am going to bed too, dreaming of you……

Posted by: Mac | November 9, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

No matter who McCain brought in as a running mate, he lost before he even started. Who would ever want a ‘bafoon repeat’ in office after 8 sickening years of Bush. This is not a good race for Republicans and it took a sacrificial candidate to get in the race. That being said, Democrats kept pounding Palin about the Curic interview with the SNL skit, like a brain wash. Even Oprah sat smirching and trying to pretend it was in good taste, when in fact it was cruel and tasteless. I hope it never happens to you. Palin may have stumped negatively as she was advised to do, but, most of what she said wasn’t broadcast on TV every half hour like the SNL skits about her were. It was belittling and worse than anything she ever said about Obama. We were hoping race and gender would not become an issue. Race didn’t but gender did in a big way. The media started in on Palin the minute she stepped of the platform the night she was introduced. The people of ABC, CNN, NBC, etc., were relentless, and beyond nasty, but, you didn’t notice because you agreed and felt self-rightous. The Women on the View were so proud of themselves for being rude and nasty to McCain they strutted around like the bunch of turkeys they are. So not one party is any better than the other. Karma was swift and its not over. By the way, for the record, I agree, Palin needs to move to another state, see how the other half thinks then maybe she can understand what happened to her and recognize how disgusting mob mentality gets. Yes, I voted for McCain/Palin not just because she was a woman, but because what I saw was so disgusting. I am an independent and like Obama and knew he would win. I think he is what we need…..but look at your remarks, you are no better than Palin.

Posted by: jim9901 | November 9, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

To cowardly and jerks she needs to add: honest forthright, truthful, open, etc.

Posted by: mainecoonrudy | November 9, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

Obama is still under investigation by Judicial Watch, a non-partisan government watchdog group. Just because he was elected president doesn’t absolve him of crimes he may have committed. It is known he funneled money to relatives while an Illinois senator and that he received preferential treatment on his mortgage rates and because the liberal media didn’t do its job hr got a free pass on his corrupt dealings. I’m an independent voter who is sick of the liberals, especially the Associated Press trying to shove their failed socialist ideas down my throat. I’ve cancelled my newspaper subscription because of the AP. I don’t watch ABC because of their bias, The Russian communists dubbed the democrats as “useful idiots.” A good description.

Posted by: Ron Powell | November 9, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

jim9901,
Palin was perfectly aware of what she was getting herself into, how every move would be scrutinized under a “sharper microscope.” Back in March, she chided Hillary Clinton for “whining” about it. Now Palin is whining and crying like a big baby about how the press has treated her.

Posted by: Rudy | November 9, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

GOP are dumping Palin. I never liked the woman and didn’t vote for her, but she did the job they asked her to do – she energised the GOP base. I think she did that job well. She had to wear nice clothes on the campaign trail. So did those travelling with her – her husband and kids. It was a lot of money, but that was the GOP decision, not Palin’s. I think she looked just as nice in her own clothes, she dressed well anyway. And anonymous sources are the worst kind of attack – how can she defend herself from these? I don’t like Sarah Palin’s politics – as I say, I didn’t vote for her or McCain. But I think that GOP are wrong to treat her like this. It must be devastating for her personally and I’m sorry for her in that regard. Chin up Sarah – you’re a strong gal, you’ll get through this. And the people who did support you are behind you, 100%. Best Wishes.

Posted by: chester burns | November 9, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

Palin was the only bright spot on the ticket. She’ll be back in 2012 and the Media and the Romney people know it and thats why they are trying to destroy her now. They did the same thing to Regan in 76 and looked how that turned out for them.

Posted by: jon | November 9, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

“Newsweek reports that top McCain aides were stunned by the huge tab, especially after adviser Nicolle Wallace had told Palin to buy three outfits for the convention and three for the campaign trail, with a budget of $25,000; instead, the nominee racked up six-figure bills at high-end department stores.”
Yet Palin claims that she didn’t shop for the clothes herself; that a “stylist” hired by the RNC did the shopping and simply handed the clothes over.
Someone is fibbing.

Posted by: WWW | November 9, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

mainecoonrudy: Honest? Forthright? Truthful? Open? How can that be when they went behind her back and made their statements anonymously! They didn’t even have the guts to allow their names to be known! That’s my definition of cowardice! A real woman or a real man doesn’t go behind a person’s back to say what they have to say about them! They stand up and say it to their face!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 9, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

Cowards? Perhaps.
But are they telling the truth? Maybe.

Posted by: Justin Case | November 9, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

This is not GOP dumping on Palin. This is GOP dumping themselves to garner sympathy for their future face of GOP. GOP realized that they need to reinvent themselves, and this is their first step. They have cast themselves as the former evil GOP, backstabbing Palin. Look how much Palin’s approval numbers have gone up within republicans. I believe it is over 90% now. Was not that high before we started ‘to feel sorry for Palin’. GOP realizes they are going down, so they’ve sacrificed the old GOP for Palin. What a dirty tatic, effective, but dirty and underhanded. We will never know who these ‘anonymous’ sources are because GOP wants the blame to fall of GOP on GOP. Not Palin. Just watch, Palin will run for senator in Alaska, and she will be the face of GOP.

Posted by: youcantfoolus | November 9, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

Sarah got exactly what was coming to her. Several old sayings come to mind, and they all have to do with fire:
“If you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen.”
“If you play with fire, you’re gonna get burned.”
“Where there’s smoke there’s fire.”
The only reason that Palin is in the news anymore, is because she’s a spectacular failure, and it’s fun to laugh at a spectacular failure; similar to the way that people laughed Dan Quayle for years. Quayle must be happy that it’s finally somebody else’s turn.

Posted by: RepubNoMore | November 9, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

WOW! This story is still up!?! I do hope that Governor Palin, The McCain campaign, and most of all the RNC, take some time and effort and read through these comments to get somewhat of a insight into what many Americans are thinking. Ya know, I was at a party last evening and of course we spoke of the election. Overwhelmingly (about 25 people) we felt that Mr. McCain could have won this. It was not the selection of Palin which bothered everyone (great! a woman!) It was her incompetency, venomous rhetoric, and lack of even the most basic grasp of domestic and international issues which just frightened everyone. The fact that she feels that she did not cost Mr. McCain votes is very telling too. I find it disturbing that the conservative right, or Republicans were using the phrase “drinking the kool-Aid” against Mr. Obama supporters (racial overtones), yet clearly with some in defending Governor Palin, it seems that they are drinking some type of Kool-Aid or taking some kind of intoxicating drug. Listen up! It was not sexism, the “liberal media,” money, or Snow White & the Seven Dwarfs that is causing this backlash against Sarah Palin. It is Sarah Palin herself! She just isn’t intellectually smart. Can she overcome this? I say yes! She certainly is popular enough and VERY SAVVY!…but I do encourage her to read, read, and do more reading! Think about policy and how what she learns fits with her ideals. I say good luck to her but I do think the Republican Party needs to provide an explanation of how they could allow a person so inept to come so close to representing our nation. What happened to “country first?”

Posted by: FS | November 9, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Who cares about Palin now? The election is over and she will head back to small town Alaska. Three years into the Obama administration, the leftist news media will still be picking on her wardrobe and her glasses. The libs must think she is a future threat to the Messiah.

Posted by: Mihan | November 9, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

I think there is an ugly female aide somewhere.

Posted by: LongT | November 9, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

It’s too bad because Sarah L. Palin almost comes to tears in the video. Sarah Palin is an embarrassment to women, pentecostals, Republicans, and Alaskans. Why does she continue to stay in the limelight rather than living out her true highest potential: best hockey mom? Instead, she is content to prove over and over her middle initial stands for Laughingstock. She is a horrifying symbol of how little we ask for in return for the total surrender of our political power. Never again will such a jibberish speaking nothingness be foisted upon us for a top spot on the ticket. The Palin nightmare is over. Thank God. McCain threw a Hail Mary and it went into the stands. His disrespect for America, shown by his Palin pick, has ruined his reputation.

Posted by: sherry | November 9, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

I’m a Dem with a soft-spot for Palin. Granted she wasnt the best VP choice, but the Dems and the media have been on an unrelenting witch hunt against her since she was selected. And we all know how sexist the old boy Republican boys are , so why on earth should we believe their smearing of Palin. Maybe Mac would have done better if the party had let him pick Lieberman or Susan Collins.

Posted by: Tommy | November 9, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

In addition to almost crying at the end of the video, Sarah Palin clearly uses sarcasm in the interview. Based on these two points from one short interview, I suggest she might be an emotionally immature person. Sad the whole country was put throught this Palin debacle. McCain’s polls started plummeting after Palin’s jibberish-speaking interviews, and before the financial meltdown. Palin continues to be talked about because she is the paramount reason McCain lost the election. History books will see this.

Posted by: sherry | November 9, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

I can’t believe the Republicans thought that the Hillary voters were that stupid. This woman was no Hillary Clinton, not even close. We all know why they put Palin on the ticket.
Too bad they couldn’t have found an intelligent woman, it may have worked. Just because we have the same body parts doesn’t mean we will vote for a woman.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

When the Alaska Legislative Committee issued the report that she’d violated that ethics code, she looked right into the camera and said that she was grateful that she’d been found not to have violated the ethics code.
Audits of the McCain campaign and RNC expenditures will ultimately determine whether or not she’s lying about the Palin Family Needless-Markup Spending Spree.
Nate Silver’s analysis of outstanding ballots in Alaska suggests that Stevens is by no means a sure win. Sarah may have to stick it out in Juneau. We can only hope.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 9, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Sarah:
I give three words for your performance: brave, smart, determined. why you’re so bombed with attacks? because they re frighted by your courage and capability. Yes, you can!!!!
Go ahead!!!! The midia even want to kill you by giving you a lower IQ mark. Shame on them.

Posted by: mary | November 9, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Let’s see; failed VP candidates who were selected by their party to run for president…Walter Mondale and Bob Dole. Will Miss Jibberish-Congeniality-Laughingstock make it in 2012? Sad story of a nothingness who got her just reward. But the good news is, she got more liberals to pray (she’d lose) than ever before. Hope she gets to keep her clothes, so “This is not all for naught.”

Posted by: sherry | November 9, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Sarah:
I give three words for your performance: brave, smart, determined. why you’re so bombed with attacks? because they re frighted by your courage and capability. Yes, you can!!!!
Go ahead!!!! The midia even want to kill you by giving you a lower IQ mark. Shame on them.
Posted by: mary | Nov 9, 2008 8:49:55 AM
Determined is about the only thing I saw. For somebody to come on the National stage and attack Obama like she did, she should have had all her ducks in a row first.
Through her own words she proved she was in over her head for the job of VP. Smart, that is very debatable. Brave, I don’t think so.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

The right wing came out of the closet with Palin. “Pallin’ around with terrorists” was dangerous jiberrish. She deserves her hard landing. I guess now the hard right has to wait awhile before once again they try to force pregnant women to submit to government rape (forced birth).

Posted by: sherry | November 9, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Posted by: Browdy Johnson | Nov 9, 2008 9:08:39 AM
I agree. Some of the stuff that came out of that woman’s mouth was despicable.
I do give credit to the Obama team for not retaliating with the same dirty politics.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

God … she is the ultimate air head … thinking she is ‘first rate’ is a blatant expression of total ignorance.

Posted by: Dr. Wayne | November 9, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

They are looking for someone to blame, and the only real person that can be saddled with is Bush. McCain/Palin did better than many republicans would have. Bush just tarnished the brand.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | November 9, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Some of you should really think before you post. Especially those calling Palin stupid..
1.If McCain would win – Nation would never know, how stupid she was? Hmmmm and you think Palin is stupid.
2.Ooooh! Didums Sarah-honey have her feelings hurt? Poor baby. Now maybe you have an idea of what it felt like to be on the recieving end of YOUR nasty, mean-sprited, small-minded, divisive hypocritical and spiteful remarks. Shut up and take your medicine, you twit.
Oh and one other thing. Do us all a favor and stay in Alaska. You no more belong on the National political stage than a muppet belongs in an opera.— Hmmm name calling is all the Obama supporters understand. They called everyone who would not/did not vote for him RACIST. Its like a 2 year old stomping their feet when they dont get their way..
3. Four years in the Senate is a lifetime of experience for a politician. Such we learned in the Presidential election 2008.—- Really interesting since all he did from the time he came to Washington was run for President.
4.I was pretty neutral about McCain – - it was Palin who scared the living daylights out of me. She was NOT ready to be president. I want a woman in office and I think America is ready for it when the right candidate comes along. She was NOT the right candidate.—- This is the same crap spewed about Hillary Clinton, the same ones said they wanted a women for President just not that women. Women are too willing to trounce another women.
—————————————
Barack Obama believes that, in the name of fairness, we should aspire to “spread the wealth”. ———- Hmmm I guess thats like giving everyone a participation award just because they show up. Not because they know how to play and win.

Posted by: Patti | November 9, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

The Republicans showed by their huge loss in this election that they misjudged the American people and how they feel and they are now once again showing that have learned nothing from that loss by touting Sarah Palin as the next savior of their party. The American people have already formed an opinion of Sarah Palin and they voted to send her back to Alaska because they did not like her retoric, her lying and her shopaholic tendencies. Which leaves us wondering why the Republicans would even be considering her in any position that requires thought, someone who speaks truth to the travils our country faces and has the ability to deal in reality.
You guys better learn a lesson and throw Palin back to the wolves.

Posted by: Grissom | November 9, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Posted by: Patti | Nov 9, 2008 9:45:42 AM
Palin was not well known before she hit the National scene. Why would you come out like she did and start bashing Obama like she did. Most of what she said was baseless lies.
She proved time and time again she knew nothing about the issues. Look at the debate, every time she didn’t know the answer to something she answered it with let’s talk about energy independence. The interviews she gave were truly pathetic and not coherent.
How can any of you say she was the best of the best on the Republican side. There were more qualified, SMART women that had a clue he could have picked.
She criticized Hillary for “whining” but what is she doing? Hillary did have a point and yes there was a lot of sexism displayed in the primaries.
Palin’s negative press was of her own making.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

If Palin tries to run for prez in 2012, I propose that she be forced to do what Barack did and fund her campaign solely on private donations. Those foolish enough to support her should pay for it, not the taxpayers. It surely will be a waste either way.

Posted by: Drew | November 9, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Mary wrote, “Sarah: I give three words for your performance: brave, smart, determined. why you’re so bombed with attacks?”
Because she launched volleys of her own dumb bombs into the air and they’re raining back down on her.

Posted by: Rudy | November 9, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Palin and Joe the Plumber can be summed up like this:
Two has beens that never were.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Sarah Palin 2012 – She is the Governor of the only state that is not in recession due to her forward thinking economic policies.
Barack Obama? His election has resulted in the biggest weekly decline in the stock market for any newly elected president, ever. THE MARKET HAS SPOKEN – THEY HAVE RENDERED THEIR JUDGEMENT ON THE OBAMA ECONOMIC PLAN. IT RECEIVED AN “F”.
Please go back to college (or Alaska) Mr. Obama and relearn this – you cannot simultaneously attack economic growth through higher taxes and at the same time successfully promote that same growth.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Sarah Palin 2010 – She is intelligent enough to know that if you use sexism and dismissiveness to silence half of our population you will ultimately fail to improve the whole of our society.
Mr. Obama seems to think sexism is just another way to win election. Pathetic…

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Sarah Palin 2008 – After the judgement rendered by the stock market last week, can we change our minds? Please?

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Axelrod
.
.
.
.
.
.
Winner

Posted by: Yawn | November 9, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Mr. Obama seems to think sexism is just another way to win election. Pathetic…
Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 10:33:44 AM
When did Obama say anything sexist about Palin? Please show us some examples.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I keep reading in the comments about taxinf the 401K’s. Tell how different is that from the McCain plan that would have considered the portion of your health plan paid by your employer to be considered as part of your income and therefore taxed.
I’ve also read hear hear that Obama will tax the 401K’s and this is therefor “communal” money. My question is ..who has any money or will have any money in there 401K since the stock market debaucle.
The taxes we already pay are “communal” . These taxes are used for roads, education, social security, etc. that are available to all as we pay into the system. Do you really want to do away with all taxes? How would you like to go home after work and have to meet with all your neighbors to decide on how to pay for fixing that pothole on the road or how you could raise money to pay for another police officer for your community. Better yet how are you going to pay for the military.. are we going to take a door to door collection?
Get real people as we have become accustomed to certain “amenities” in this country and in order to have them we need to pay for them. My grandfather came to this country in the early 1900′s from eastern Europe and worked his butt off to make a better life and never once complained about paying taxes as he was so gratful he could live in a country that offered so much. If he heard you complain about your taxes or anything in this counrty he would tell you in his broken English “If you no like -you leave.”

Posted by: I've had it | November 9, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Jwench,
The week after every election the stock market either goes up or goes down based on the forward looking economic plans of the incoming administration. The markets are always forward looking.
When the markets looked at Obama’s plans to raise capital gains taxes and raise businesses taxes they know the negative impact it will have – THEY HAVE SEEN IT BEFORE UNDER THE CARTER ADMINISTRATION. We should not repeat the mistakes of the past.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Obama got elected and our stock market died…
Obama got elected and our stock market died…
Obama got elected and our stock market died…
(I like to use liberal slogans in the morning)
Sarah Palin has been the steady hand in charge of the Alaska economy and Alaskan’s continue to prosper.
SARAH PALIN 2012

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I’ve had it,
Our money is now an “amenities”? Are you serious? My 401k money and the 401k money of other hard working Americans who have sacrificed to save is not some “Amenity” that Barack Obama can just take and add to a communal pool that he then dispenses to those who have not been responsible, or to those who are lazy.
Please research the plan Democrats have for taxing and ultimately confiscating your 401k money. Search y*hoo for “Democrats 401k” and learn more before your money and your economic rights are taken from you.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

You folks who think Palin should run in 2012 should think about this…
1.) While Palin received negative press during the campaign it was by her own doing or those advising her (her own people or McCain’s). The Democrats merely stood by and watched. That won’t happen in 2012 and they now have tons of ammunition to hurl against her in ads. In fact, other Republicans will hurl it long before she becomes nominee (which I doubt will happen).
2.) While she may have enerergized her base she has turned out moderates and independents. And her “maverick” or “rouge” indicates she won’t listen to handlers. Political strategists and thinkers know that is very dangerous in an election. Sort of like a quarterback who throws 30 touchdown passes and 30 interceptions in a season. They difficult to win a Super Bowl with.
I actually think Palin would be better off leaving the Republican party and running as a third party candidate. She is basically in charge of an offshoot of the Republican party and not its core. Core Republicans, those true to its fundamental values, would never tolerate someone like Palin. Too undisciplined..

Posted by: indy_voter | November 9, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Curt,
Your candidate lost because instead of telling us what He was going to do, he and his Alaskan mutt were smearing Obama. His plans would not have pulled us out of this economic debacle. More of the same old fat cat policies.
At least Obama is consulting with economists on how best to attack this problem.
Quit whining. We have a new leader and I suggest you either deal with it or move to Alaska with your beloved Palin and join with her and Todd to secede from the union. The election is over and the people have spoken.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Sarah Palin 2012 – She is intelligent enough to understand that private propery rights are the cornerstone of economic freedom. You can trust her not to confiscate the money that YOU have earned. Sarah is also intelligent enough to know that YOUR money is not an “amenity” that you no longer deserve.
Barack Obama? Not so much…
Please research the plan Democrats have for taxing and ultimately confiscating your 401k money. Search y*hoo for “Democrats 401k” and learn more before your money and your economic rights are taken from you.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Curt,
Just curious what site did you read on 401k’s. I googled it and the first two pages are nothing but Republican sites.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Jwench
I am not “whining”, I am simply positioning my candidate for 2012. Once Obama raises taxes (the first time since Hoover that a president id doing so in the face of a recession)and our economy goes from bad to REALLY bad, the American people are going to look for a leader who has shown that they have a better solution. That is why I will continue to advocate for Sarah Palin – she might lack in some of the inside the beltway patter – but she has a set of core beliefs that will make America great.
Also, this is the example set by the liberals. They began to attack Reagan even before he took office and have never let up. We on the other side would be foolish to not use the politics of personal destruction that the left has used so effectively all these years. That is not cynical, that is just the reality of where the 28 year liberal scream has left the American political scene.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 11:08:58 AM
I hope she does run in 2012. Obama will get 4 more years to get this country back.
Take oil out of the equation in Alaska and tell me if they would be in the same position as most other states.
Those checks they get from the oil is a form of socialism. I would say that the price of fuel at $8-9 a gallon there is nothing to brag of. She is also the Queen of Pork.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

jwench, I guess if you don’t want to find something it never seems to be found. However, you are correct that the media coverage of something that would fundamentally alter our retirement system such as this receives such scant attention from the media.
Sarah Palin 2012 – she will never see YOUR money as anything other than YOUR money.
Barack Obama?
Is this what you envisioned when Obama promised to ‘spread the wealth”
——————————–
House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation’s $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.
House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-California, and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Washington, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee’s Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Curt… I never said the money was an amenity. What I said and if you would re-read the comment I was referring to and had lumped together the things are taxes pay for … schools, roads, military,,etc I just happened to call them an amenity (I will refer to them as necessities from now on so all will understand) as we all have access to them and use them. These necessities are the things we Americans have grown used to having in our daily lives and we need to pay for these in order to ensure we have them. Have I cleared this up for you?
Don’t take things out of context to try to support you own conclusions.

Posted by: I've had it | November 9, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

The Obama economic plan reads like it was lifted (maybe Joe Biden?) straight from the Jimmy Carter playbook. The results – 16% unemployment, 21 percent inflation, and killer rabbits – OH MY!
There is a better way – Sarah Palin 2012.
The Obama presidency will be so profoundly failed based on the economic principles espoused by him that Republicans will be able to run anyone and win in 2012. Fortunately for America we will nominate a highly qualified, hard working, insightful, WOMAN.
Enough with failed male politicians – it is TIME FOR A CHANGE.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

I’ve Had It,
But that is the point. I don’t want the government to continue to take more and more and then return 20 cents on the dollar to me. I want to keep my 401k money so I can plan for my own retirement, not having to rely on a government run program that will get raided, much like Social Security, for other budgetary “priorities”. I jumped on you use of the term “amenities” because I think there is a serious threat posed by an Obama administration in regards to economic freedom. Use of terms such as “amenities” implies an attempt to soften the blow when OUR resources are siphoned off by the government. I want to call it what it is – socialism. If America wants to go that direction then that will be their choice and I can do nothing about it. However, I want to make sure the American people know exactly what it will mean to them, provide them with clear and unambiguous information, and ultimately rally the American people to oppose it on the grounds of economic freedom. After all, once we cede power to the government it will not be return freely. The issue of economic freedom is too great to have it dismissed just because we want to support our preferred political candidate.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

I have always suspected that Sarah Palin was chosen specifically because McCain was never intended to be president at any time. Decisions, such as choice of running mate, are made strategically with an specific outcome in mind. Sarah Palin was chosen precisely because McCain was intended to lose all along. Kind of like throwing a boxing match.

Posted by: S | November 9, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Curt said:
“Fortunately for America we will nominate a highly qualified, hard working, insightful, WOMAN.
Enough with failed male politicians – it is TIME FOR A CHANGE.”
Amen time for a real change.

Posted by: Christi | November 9, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Curt said:
“Fortunately for America we will nominate a highly qualified, hard working, insightful, WOMAN.
Enough with failed male politicians – it is TIME FOR A CHANGE.”
Amen time for a real change.
Posted by: Christi | Nov 9, 2008 11:37:56 AM
To you and Curt,
Name 5 things she has done that makes you think she would be a good President.
Take oil out of the equation in Alaska.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

She’ll be back in 2012 because she enjoys the spotlight. However, as I have said many, many times this was not McCain’s choice. I truly blame his team for Sarah Palin. McCain should not come to her defense because he didn’t want her anyway! They knew she was not intelligent but they wanted to get the women vote. Women are much smarter than they throught. She’ll be back yabetcha and it’s not going to be nice how they treat her because they have the information on her that is not revealed as of yet – they are beefing her up to resurface for a reason. People think – she is not the new face of the republican party – they know what they are doing and she is too stupid to understand that she is playing with the big boys now!

Posted by: Mike | November 9, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I too believe that a woman will be nominated in the near future but it’s not Palin. Those guys understand they have to clean up the mess they created so they will let her resuface and destroy her during the debates in the primaries.

Posted by: TedfromMO | November 9, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

How much force does it take to get Sarah ‘Pit Bull’ Palin to back down when she feels strongly about an issue? Let’s look at how she stood up to some mean old campaign officials.
While locked away up in a hotel room, Sarah Palin was presented with a $3,500 jacket by her stylist. Palin protested, “No, no, no, no, no. I would never wear this at home, I would never wear this outside of home. This is too much, this isn’t me,” The mean old campaign officials told Palin she should wear the jacket. Princess Palin said okay and asked for a Diet Dr. Pepper. The End.
Note: the quote is directly from Sarah Palin’s aide Meg Stapleton.

Posted by: WWW | November 9, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Sarah will become a talk host – watch what I say – she done on the policial scene…. These guys and gals will destroy her believe me.. Just wait!

Posted by: TedfromMO | November 9, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Sarah also flirted with the team a little to much and wearing a towel in front of those guys wasn’t cute. Todd was present when she presented herself in that fashion. Shame on her for using her looks and body in that fashion but no brains. Clueless Sarah will be back!

Posted by: TedfromMO | November 9, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

mike, you are incorrect. Look at what happened to the “big boys” in Alaska when they took on Sarah Palain directly. Mr. Murkowski was sent packing, Mr. Stevens is hanging by a thread, and Mr. Young has been chastised. Sarah Palin is TOUGH. She will hopefully clean up the national Republican party as she has in Alaska.
I do agree however that there was an inside agreement in the Republican party to send McCain down to defeat and setup Obama for failure. There is simply too much ammunition that was kept dry during the campaign concerning Mr. Obama. After Obama is destroyed she will emerge as the concensus in 2012.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

I too believe that a woman will be nominated in the near future but it’s not Palin. Those guys understand they have to clean up the mess they created so they will let her resuface and destroy her during the debates in the primaries.
Posted by: TedfromMO | Nov 9, 2008 11:48:26 AM
I agree it won’t be Palin. Hillary said she will not run again, but that remains to be seen. Between the two I think Hillary has a clue. Palin does not. There are enough intelligent women that could run in the future.

Posted by: Jwench | November 9, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Hmmmmm…taking things out of context on national news to make someone appear to be saying something they didn’t. Hmmmm sounds familiar. In fact it sounds exactly like what Palin did for 2 1/2 months about Obama. It’s called karma!

Posted by: Obama supporter in Iowa | November 9, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Taxes are NOT about the support of a certain political candidate, Democrat or Republican, it is about things that all have access to and use on a daily basis and we have to somehow pay for these. If you don’t want to pay taxes the question then becomes what do you want to give up. Do you want to give up federal funds to help states repair roads, or do a away with federal funds for our schools, or do away with funds to repair the interstate highways, or do you want to reduce our military. What exactly do you want to do away with?
I happen to appreciate all these neccesities (things our taxes pay for) that we have in this country. We have to somehow pay for these whether it’s taxes or our leaders going thru our federal buget and reallocating money or eliminating programs.
Stop dwelling on that mantra of the “lazy people who do nothing”. Unfortunately, this is a reality and I’ll bet their numbers are small compared to the millions of us who do pay taxes. We millions who do pay the taxes in turn do enjoy what our country has to offer. So should we stop paying taxes to spite the “lazy people”. As far a I know you can’t deport people for being lazy.

Posted by: I've had it | November 9, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Jwench – 5 things, I’ll give you ten
1) She has never threatened to “Spread the wealth”
2) She has cut small business taxes
3) She eliminated property taxes in Wasilla
3) She took on a corrupt political system in Alaska
4) She gave the people of Wasilla a CHOICE on whether to invest in a new hockey arena. No mandated my way or else.
5) She chose to saved the life of a beautiful child named Trig
6) Her state is the only on that is not now in recession
7) She negotiated a new pipeline, which will benefit all of us here in the lower 48
8) She has hired more female staffers than Obama ever will. And she will benefit from this wise choice.
9) She has had an approval rating that at times has been over 80%. Do you think Obama will ever get there? Even once?
10) She has returned excess money, found through her good governance, to the people of Alaska. This is unheard of in politics. When was the last time you saw any politician return money to the people that they could just as easily spent? This is in contrast to Obama’s plan to take your money and then spread it to others.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

“there was an inside agreement in the Republican party”
Yeah sure, the Republican Party is still secretly in charge, and have a secret plan to secretly control EVERYTHING (secretly).
MORE PARANOID REPUBLICAN SECRET CONSPIRACY THEORIES.
What are you, a Mason? (secretly?)

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Curt:
FYI: OBAMA WON THE ELECTION.
Palin has publically humiliated herself with her overreaching ambition. She is an embarrassment to the Republican Party and to any American with a brain in their head.
FACE IT. IT’S OVER.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Posted by: Curt | Nov 9, 2008 11:55:11 AM
curt we will see who is right.. Keep voting for Palin! She’s done! LoL

Posted by: TedfromMO | November 9, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

The Obama presidency is doomed. The Republicans simply have too much information on this guy and will bring him down. In four years he will be hated even more than Bush, and that isn’t easy. Unfortunately, the only way to save himself is through the route that Bill Clinton took. Basically ceding power to the Republicans in the house and senate and then using them as a foil for failures. Obama is not as intelligent as Clinton and will not learn these lessons. His arrogance will not allow himself to move from his already made decisions. I believe we are truly in for a troubling, nasty, anything goes debate over whether we become a European type socialistic country or whether we stay a capitalistic country. Obama will be buffetted by this argument and will be blamed by both sides.
When Obama is brought low, the country will elect Sarah Palin in 2012. Some of you out there may fear her but that is just your bias today. She will ultimately win you over because she is consistent. She espouses a set of core principles that guide her actions, which will be very comfortable after four years of never knowing what Obama believes or which side he will come down on an issue. It will be interesting to see how many people are on this board four years from now to defend Obama. I guess very few.
This is a good thing – It will give us Sarah Palin in 2012

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Palin doesn’t have anything to complain about. She didn’t see anything wrong with making false accusations or taking words out of context when she was talking about Barack Obama. What’s sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose.

Posted by: Rosemary | November 9, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Rep Lewis was right, according to a story out today: “Sarah Palin’s attacks on Barack Obama’s patriotism provoked a spike in death threats against the future president, Secret Service agents revealed during the final weeks of the campaign. The Secret Service warned the Obama family in mid October that they had seen a dramatic increase in the number of threats against the Democratic candidate, coinciding with Mrs Palin’s attacks. Michelle Obama, the future First Lady, was so upset that she turned to her friend and campaign adviser Valerie Jarrett and said: “Why would they try to make people hate us?” The revelations, contained in a Newsweek history of the campaign, are likely to further damage Mrs Palin’s credentials as a future presidential candidate.” When you encourage it, and give your stamp of approval, you become an accomplice. Sarah Palin should join her associate Ted Stevens in jail.

Posted by: vietnamvetx | November 9, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

to those who remind me that the election is over, I say the election has just begun (2012). Unfortuantly, the politics of personal destruction will play a bigger role in this election than it has in the past. We on the Republican side have four years to expose Obama, we have four years to ridicule his failures, we have four years to tie every bill that comes out of a Democratic congress around his neck, we also have four years to slowly detail Obama’s personal life. When the complaints start that this is not fair, we will simply point to Sarah Palin, and return to our work.
Obama believes sexism and dismissiveness toward women is a winning political strategy. I believe it is dispicable.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

“The Republicans simply have too much information”
Don’t tell me … IT’S A SECRET!!!!!
DOUBLE-SECRET!!!!
Any minute now they’re going to reveal that Obama …
SECRETLY DOESN’T HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE!!!
SECRETLY IS A SECRET MARXIST!!!
SECRETLY HAS A SECRET COUSIN ODINGA WHO’S A SECRET MARXIST-MUSLIM!!!
SECRETLY SAID “WHITEY” ON A SECRET WHITEY-TAPE!!!
Oooooh, JUST WAIT TILL THEY BRING HIM LOW WITH ALL THEIR SECRET INFORMATION!!!!
AAAAAAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA …
*GASP*
AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I wonder if Sarah Palin feels any remorse over the heightened number of death threats against Obama. All she seemed to care about at the time were ‘attacks’ on her by the press.
From 2 weeks ago:
“Sarah Palin said she fears her First Amendment rights may be threatened by ‘attacks’ from reporters who suggest she is engaging in a negative campaign against Barack Obama.”
Palin told WMAL-AM that her criticism of Obama’s associations, like those with 1960s radical Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, should not be considered negative attacks. Rather, for reporters or columnists to suggest that it is going negative may constitute an attack that threatens a candidate’s free speech rights under the Constitution, Palin said.”
What a maroon.

Posted by: WWW | November 9, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

“We on the Republican side have four years to expose Obama”
You mean the same Republicans who just got their behinds kicked for the last two years by a much smarter, much more capable, MUCH MORE AMERICAN Obama, resulting in a LANDSLIDE VICTORY in the Presidential election?
GUESS WHAT?
OBAMA HAS FOUR YEARS TO KICK YOUR BUTTS SOME MORE, ONLY NOW HE’LL BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHILE HE’S DOING IT.
Watcha got? Whitey-tape? Yeah, maybe that’ll work! Go for it!
LOL.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Axelrod
.
.
.
.
.
.
Winner

Posted by: Yawn | November 9, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

R Mutt,
Seems like you are challenging people to come forward and take on Mr. Obama. I appreciate that.
The certain shelf life of political teflon means that sooner or later it will wear off. Things that were ignored because Obama was the first black candidate will not be ignored when his policies begin to negatively impact the daily lives of the American people. Once that happens a reassessment of everything that we believed we knew about him will begin. That is the opening for the loyal opposition. This does not take much analysis to understand and it is not, as you seem to imply, some “Far Right Conspiracy”. No, just a reminder that sooner or later you will have to defend Obama through the clarifying light of what he has actually done. To date, he has no real political baggage – that will change.

Posted by: Curt | November 9, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Go Sarah your friends in Alaska know you and what you have done. don’t let the hater get you down

Posted by: Christi | November 9, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Wow, the dark forces are still out to
destroy Sarah. Gosh, she’s back in Alaska now, so what IS the point of the
scorched earth policy towards her. It’s because she is STILL a threat to the Dems and the wishy-washy mod.Repubs. They
need to destroy her before she makes a
return in 2012.
As for those of you who keep sneering on
and on about Sarah’s intellect, readiness,abilities…..that is all spin stuff from the MSM and few of you
did your “homework” on your own to find
out for yourselves. Nor did you do your
homework to find out who Obama really is. Sure, the media knows how to select
a candidate so, that you, the sheeple would buy the product they peddled.
Not a peep from MSM about the fact that Prez-elect Obama was never vetted by
them or the dems. A news black out on Obama’s negatives stayed in effect during the campaign to keep we, the people “dumbed down. What about his shady past and his
abysmal voting record in the state and U.S. Senate? Oh, wait a minute, facts
don’t matter, only fuzzy feelings count.
Considering that most “unthinking” people think a president should be chosen like the winner of American Idol, it is fitting that we have the
newly chosen A.I., Prez-elect Obama!

Posted by: littleleers | November 9, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Curt: Fine. You’re perfectly welcome to challenge Obama on his policies and the record he will create. That’s a healthy system.
You seem to be suggesting, however, that all the secret paranoid right-wing boogieman fantasies that failed during the election process will suddenly gain legitimacy if they’re repeated once he’s President.
Did you ever hear the story about the boy who cried “Wolf”?
Moral of the story: repeating demonstrable falsehoods has the effect of discrediting both future lies and the liar himself.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS DISCREDITED ITSELF.
Enjoy your time in the wilderness. Hope you brought a pack of matches, cause IT’S GONNA BE A LONG, COLD JOURNEY.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

The American mainstream media with exception of Fox high jacked the election. Their treatment of Palin was so awful I don’t know how these people can live with themselves. There are still stories being written – da the race is over! But they hate so much they can’t help them selves. Sarah Palin you did good I for one am so sorry you had to endure such awful treatment by so called Americans.

Posted by: a citizen | November 9, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

ADVICE TO SARAH PALIN FOR 2012:
VET YOUR VP PICK.
LOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | November 9, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Obama thought that Canada was governed by a president.

Posted by: Michelle | November 9, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Sarah Palin thinks the prime minister of Canada is Stef Carse.

Posted by: WWW | November 9, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I believe the GOP has several rising stars and Palin leads the pack. I stumbled across a Web site with a list of potential candidates for 2012.

Posted by: casey | November 9, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

it’s quite interesting. those with an education know the deficits of Palin, those without a college education think she’s smart. Those of us in psychiatry know she has the potential to become a charasmatic leader… for the good or bad, we must observe closely.

Posted by: cartagena | November 9, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

As documented above, these attacks are coming from within the REPUBLICAN party on Palin – and the accusations are she is ignorant, a clothes hog, overspender and so on . . .
We are left with options.
Either these are appalling attacks and typical of what all the electorate saw during the campaign as a common REPUBLICAN tactic against Obama.
Or, they are true.
In either case, it’s a sad state of affairs for the Republican party.
Thank goodness they were voted out of power.

Posted by: pefros | November 9, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

@casey – how in the name of all things good is Sarah Palin a “rising star”? She almost single-handedly cost John McCain the election. I say “almost” because McCain had a part in his defeat too, with his outdated policies and insistence that the U.S. economy was strong until it proved him wrong. I’ll give Palin credit were credit is due. She’s photogenic and can deliver a well-scripted speech, those things didn’t concern me or trouble me. What was of paramount concern was her inability to know key things that would be required of a government official just a step away from the Oval Office. I don’t care if she can see Alaska, if she knows Africa is a continent or how much money the RNC spent on clothes and accessories. All of that is just pure nonsense and fodder for a media without anything else to do. Today we cater to American’s insatiable appetite for Reality TV, soundbytes and trashy braindead programming like Judge Judy and Jerry Springer. All rubbish.
Palin might someday ascend to the highest office in our government, but to do so she’ll have to show America that she can handle the job.
For now, Barack Obama is our president so we better all learn to come together and work together toward the common purpose and common goal of repairing this nation. We owe it to ourselves, our seniors and the generations to come.

Posted by: Rob | November 9, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

It is so satisfying to watch the Republicans turning their attacks against one of their own. Not only shows the nature of the party, but illustrates their complete lack of discipline. Way to go!

Posted by: vietnamvetx | November 9, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

In recent history, there were two failed VP candidates who were selected by their party to run for president…Walter Mondale and Bob Dole. They both lost big. In the final analysis, Miss Jibberish-Congeniality-Laughingstock probably will not make it in 2012. I am afraid Sarah Palin has become a sad story of a nothingness attack dog who got her just reward. The Palin nightmare is over for everyone. McCain threw a Hail Mary and it went into the stands. His disrespect for America, shown by his Palin pick, harmed his reputation.

Posted by: sherry | November 9, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

I don’t think that McCain was set up to lose in order to doom the Obama presidency. I think that the Republican party had a terrible crop of choices, and McCain was the best of the worst. But no one wanted him to be president either, and choosing Palin as a running mate guaranteed that he would lose the election. They “threw the boxing match” because they wanted Obama to win simply because he was the better candidate. Of course the party could never say that, though, could they?

Posted by: S. | November 9, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

She typifies Cyndi Lauper’s
“Girls just want to have fun.”

Posted by: anon | November 9, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

“1.) While Palin received negative press during the campaign it was by her own doing or those advising her (her own people or McCain’s). The Democrats merely stood by and watched.”
Are you freakin’ kidding me? The DailyKos and Huffington Post (both huge Obama supporters) started with the BS the within 24 hours of Palin being named as VP pick. Bloggers systematically went from site to site spreading malicious lies and anonymous gossip and the MSM did nothing to disprove any of it because they were too busy flying to Alaska to rummage through Palin’s garbage cans.
What happened to Palin will happen again to another candidate. Why shouldn’t it? It worked so well this time. By reading these comments I can only assume that most of you believe every horrid thing that was said about her.
And I bet you dollars to donuts that none of you did any independent research to find out if any or all of it is true.

Posted by: mak | November 9, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

So Palin gets bent out of shape when the shoe is on the other foot. Her buddy McCain, and then her especially, took many comments about now President-elect Obama out of context. This lady is absolutely a lunatic. I hope the Republican party gets over her real quick in their rebuilding effort.

Posted by: devilkev | November 9, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

What’s next for Sarah Palin? If we’re lucky – oblivion. To think I’d have to listen to that irritating voice again in four years makes my skin crawl.

Posted by: Sylvia | November 9, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Palin is the most popular governor in the United States of America. Barack Obama has been a senator for a couple of years,, half of the time he was running for President. Palin was the VP choice. John McCain was running for President. There was no way to discredit McCain, so the opposition went after Palin as if she was the opponent for Obama. It was insane. McCain is a true hero with a lifetime of experience so the election was obviously a case of the people vs. Bush and Palin – there weren’t any real arguments vs. McCain. I hope Obama can make good decisions as teh President. At least for now the world at large will have a better opinion of our country even if our new President will be a risk to national security. The economy has nowhere to go but up so its improvement is a given – Obama’s job keeping us secure will be the most important aspect of his Presidency. Our innovative people will heal and improve our economy – not the government.

Posted by: Will Massey | November 9, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

John McCain’s bid for the White House was doomed long before he exploited Sarah Palin, thinking she would steal away Hillary’s supporters. His campaign strategy was too vicious, racist, divisive and dangerous. I’m neither a McCain nor Palin supporter. I voted for Obama. But I don’t like the way they are trying to place sole blame on Palin for McCain’s lost. McCain did himself in. Many tried to warn that his style of campaigning was turning a lot of even his supporters off and would backfire. He didn’t want to listen. The GOP always devour its own and his young. Look how they turned on Powell. Then tried to blame all Bush failures on Rice in the beginning. That’s their style. Their strategy. Point the finger at the odd man out. They bring these people on board for the sole purpose and intent of throwing them to the dogs when their strategy fails.

Posted by: GOP_Throw_Palin_UnderDa_Bus | November 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

mak wrote:
“By reading these comments I can only assume that most of you believe every horrid thing that was said about her.
And I bet you dollars to donuts that none of you did any independent research to find out if any or all of it is true.”
Was it a fake video of the witch exorcist casting the witchcraft out of Sarah Palin?
Was the video of Palin asking churchgoers to pray that soldiers are being sent out “on a task that is from God” a fake?
Was the video of Sarah Palin telling the secessionists “Keep up the good work and God bless you,” a fake?
Was it a fake video of the town hall meeting showing Palin speaking gibberish about oil exports?
Was the “you can see Russia” Charlie Gibson video a fake?
Was the “you can see Russia” Katie Couric video a fake?
Was the audio clip of Palin saying the legislative Troopergate report cleared her of “any hint of any kind of unethical activity” a fake?
Was the video of the debate showing Palin winking and dodging questions a fake?
Were the many videos of Palin’s stump speeches with the “thanks but no thanks” statement all fakes?
Were the many videos of her stump speeches inciting the crowds with comments about Obama’s ‘terrorist connections’ all fakes?
Was the audio of the prank phone call revealing a gullible, giggling, fawning Palin a fake?
Were any or all of those BS, mak?

Posted by: WWW | November 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

For you secular humanists out there, skip this post and just keep doing what you are doing. For the rest of you, think about this. We have a new president. The election is barely over and we are already back at each other’s throats. I suggest that you try reading Romans, 13:1, “Let every person be subject to the authorities over him, for there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are ordained by God.” I don’t know whether Obama will be a good president, but I do know that he was not elected by accident. He may be an instrument to chasten America or he may lead us into a new mindset. No one can know at this juncture, probably not even the president elect hinself. One thing I do know, however, is that his election was no accident. The Creator of this universe knows what he is doing and He is still on His throne. America rejected Sarah Palin. There are different opinions as to why. I believe that she was rejected because she makes the rest of us look small. Sarah Palin is much too good for the country that America has become. “A heretic is a man that sees with his own eyes.” Gotthold Ephraim Lessing

Posted by: AmericanHeretic | November 10, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Justin Case: No, Justin, they aren’t telling the truth. Think about it! When did Sarah have time to shop? She was on the road most of the time or flying from rally to rally, sometimes attending at least 4 or 5 different rallys and fund raisers in one day and in 4 or 5 different states! There is only 24 hours in a day and Sarah Palin is a human being. She can’t be in two places at once and she has to sleep sometimes. There is no way on earth that she could have done that shopping herself. Those clothes were bought by RNC aides. More than likely all Sarah did was tell them their sizes. I doubt that she even told them where to shop. They just took her list of sizes and they did the rest. It was probably their idea to buy the items at the most expensive stores in the world because they didn’t think it would look right for a vp pick to wear cheap clothing. In fact I think the whole thing was their idea. Sarah was very happy wearing her own clothing. She said so. Also most of that clothing was returned to the stores unused and the RNC received a refund for it. The worn clothing was given to charity. Sarah Palin kept none of it. Also there was a big discrepancy between the actual cost of the clothing and what was reported by the media. The actual cost of the clothing was not not nearly as much as what the media reported!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

“Most of that clothing was returned to the stores unused and the RNC received a refund for it. The worn clothing was given to charity… The actual cost of the clothing was not not nearly as much as what the media reported!”
Seven suitcases worth of clothing have not been returned yet, according to Palin’s aide Meg Stapleton: “Aides were at the Palins’ Wasilla home Friday sorting through the luggage, and will return any clothing and accessories that don’t belong to them to the RNC, Stapleton said: ‘All of it is going back.’”
And how do you know how much money was actually spent, carlyonsue?

Posted by: WWW | November 10, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

carlyonsue. I bloody agree with you. The Media and some McCain Aids didn’t tell the truth. They should some respect to Gov. Palin. I’m sure the truth will be coming soon. They can’t hide the truth forever. We have to wait and see how media was manipulated 2008 election.

Posted by: Cliffton | November 10, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

WWW: Just count up the tabs from the stores. It doesn’t add up.

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 10, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

It is a little troubling that a mature woman who has a high profile political position had such unpresentable clothing that a shopping spree was necessary. I have run campaigns for years and do not ever remember major clothing sprees for my candidates. I can remember adding a couple extra white blouses or shells or an extra pair of black trousers/skirt, but never more than a ocuple hundred at most.
Other than one absolutely hideous pink jacket, all of the clohes in the pictures from Wasilla wer pesentable. Maybe we were supposed to beieve that she was something she was not…..
Hillary had seven suitcases, but six were filled with brfiefing books!
I guess when there is no substance, you have to resort to distractive windowdressing.

Posted by: Annie | November 10, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

If these were aides making these accusations about Palin, wouldn’t they have some fact to it. They were there. I agree, McCain should be coming to her defense if these are false statements.
I don’t think she is ready for the office of the pres., and think a lot of people saw this. She isn’t aware of the foreign policy and the economy. Her biggest thing in the campaign was attacking Obama. I would think that if you are in the running for vp or pres, you would be able to answer the questions asked and not evade them.
I’ve heard many people say Charlie Gibson was hard on her during the interview. Would you have said that about Obama, McCain or Biden? She failed the debate and the winking was too much.
If you’re in the political arena, you have to take the good with the bad. People will criticize and question you. If you’re in this position, you have to be able to face it.

Posted by: smt | November 10, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

I believe the media and country owes Palin an apology! She has a son in Iraq fighting FOR US and this country – how does he feel if he and his comrades read this crap about his mother. And, what about her “special Needs” child – when he gets older – he’ll have to hear this crap about his mother. Will he understand??? The media is a disgrace. What about Obama and his aunt in this country illegally – you barely hear about that or that Halloween costume Michelle wore the night he was elected!

Posted by: Jill | November 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Rich Davis the head of the RNC came on Fox News and stated to the camera and America that all the allegations about Palin WERE NOT TRUE!!! She’s right, it’s very immature and cruel!

Posted by: Jill | November 10, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Has the media and you guys lost respect for the human being??? What the hell is wrong with all of you???

Posted by: Jill | November 10, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Hello!!!!! There was NO shopping spree!!!!!!!

Posted by: Jill | November 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

I don’t think people need to even consider information received from unnamed sources to make a pretty good assessment of Sarah Palin’s grasp of the world. Her public statements are more than enough to define her particular BRAND. I think it highly iconic that someone so obviously challenged has never admitted one single instance where negative news was true. All of her apparent stupidity aside, it is her more than obvious hateful attitude that seems to clinch it for her. I am waiting for someone to ask her about how she feels to have been linked by the secret service to a surge in threats from white supremacy types against the President Elect. My guess is that she will just laugh it off as some unfounded rumor. But by GOD, after being told her effect on these people, if she does it again???
Freedom of speech is great. But inciting to riot is another.

Posted by: jrc903 | November 10, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

America has chosen it’s 44th President & it is what the media & most people here wanted. Let just wait & see how he delivers all the promises he made…I am not holding my breathe.
There is no reason or point to keep bashing Mrs Palin. She is not the 1st to run & lose as a VP…but there seem to be an under current to all this.
Some left wingers seem to be jumping on the grave of the dead & seem to enjoy doing so. It feels like to be qualified to be President of the US, onoe has to be a high powered Lawyer who can say too much & mean very little or nothing.
I respect Gov. Palin for having a clear view or opinion. I might not share them all but at least the Lady say it as it is…
I hope for the rest of the world & America’s sake you voted the right guy in… otherwise we will all regret like we seem to be doing now about GW Bush.

Posted by: colenmon | November 10, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

And now that Jake is senior correspondent at the White House, ABC has returned to the practice of deleting posts that criticize Obama and present a strategy for the Republicans to come back.
Ominous.

Posted by: len | November 10, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I think that Tina Fey actually did Sarah Palin a favor. Because the SNL clips were played so many times, I am sure some people actually started believing that Palin was as sweetly naive as she was portrayed on SNL. The truth is that Sarah Palin is a crusty low class hateful politically opportunistic wannabe, with absolutely nothing to offer–but heartache. But again, she did not pick herself. She could have stayed up there in Alaska, and no one would have known about her– except for some obviously very cynical people close to Senator McCain’s campaign. Put another way, rattle snakes are really quite harmless if they are left alone in their own environment. So,the blame for Palin belongs on those who plucked her out of her native homeland.

Posted by: jrc903 | November 10, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

We need to start backing our new president and stop bashing all the politicans. The country voted for Obama. What a great choice. We are Americans and need to support him in OUR efforts to rebuild our country. The constant negative does not rebuild -it continues to divide our great country. Yes We Can!

Posted by: ruth | November 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I am still amazed at Republicans and others believing Sarah Palin is the “new face/voice of Republicans”!
Sarah Palin is angry because she is ignorant! A video of women from Alaska stated that Alaskans expectations of their politicans is low. Well,, I believe them because Sarah Palin is the govenor!
If the Republicans want to talk 2012 and support Sarah Palin for their pick for president, SHE WILL NOT WIN!
Palin’s appeal is only to the “hockey moms” and “joe six-packs”! That leaves out a lot of diverse people!
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Shay | November 10, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I’ve always liked Charlie Gibbons. I defended him when friends said he was not good enough to replace Peter Jennings… But I really disliked the cheap shot he had for Sarah Palin when he said maybe the new puppy for the White House should be a Rottwailer and it’s name should be “Lipstick”.
Charlie, I am soooo dissapointed in you!
That was really low.

Posted by: Betty Nugent | November 10, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

The media was far too easy on Palin. Here was a woman who could now be vice elect.
Forget the Africa story – there are even bigger fish to fry. She was clueless on the Bush Doctrine (Gibson); and the 700 billion bailout (Couric). Her appolgists continue to support her and say that she was mistreated by an unfair media. Please. You are either prepared or you were not. She was not. That is clear. The only problem now is that she is back in our state at her office in Anchorage instead of the capital in Juneau because that’s next door to her home and then took 233 days of per dium last year while staying at her home.

Posted by: Steve | November 10, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I agree! The media was extremely too soft on Palin. Sarah made herself looked terrible not John McCain. . I just hope she resurface in 2012 because the GOP will ensure her disappearance from the national scene. She will be good for skits on “SNL” though! When she kept sprouting out ramblings and the inadequate answers that she was given America realized that she was a total mistake. Sarah Palin should have never been on any state yet alone the Republican Party. I could only assume Alaska picked her on a fluke.

Posted by: TedfromMO | November 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

It is true that we need to get off this awful subject, and focus on how we, as a people, can unite behind our, (soon-to-be) president. I am hopeful for the future–I think, I am also realistic. President Elect Obama, is our last best hope for this country. Now that we have voted, we must now get ready to make substantial personal sacrifices for the good of future generations of Americans. We have elected a new president– a transformational leader who has the intelligence,wisdom,courage, and temperament to lead this nation out of the wilderness. For all the importance we put on selecting a president–we not just sit back expect the government to “FIX US.”I think we need to reinvent the way citizens think about ourselves and our government—it really is a partnership. Undoubtedly, President Obama will make decisions that will irk a certain number of people. Some of us will be affected more than others. But we are all in this together, and we must defer our personal agendas– at least for the foreseeable future. The last guy who had such challenges also had about four terms to make a difference. But don’t have 16 years this time. So, lets sweep the naysayers aside and get to work being good proactive citizens–led by this potentially great man.

Posted by: jrc903 | November 10, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

“I want to be able to help also Americans to know that they can trust their media,” Palin said”.
From another Blogger!
Sarah Palin is a walking disaster: intellectually incurious, ignorant on many issues, small-minded (remember the comment about “pro-American” parts of the country? Well New York City where there were countless heroes on 9-11 is one of the most Democratic cities in the country. Tell New Yorkers they aren’t pro-American!), and shallow. That John McCain was willing to put someone so clearly unqualified a heart beat away is appalling.
Just happy she was not put into office and now we have to move on… We know she will resurface because she enjoyed the spotlight but it will not last long.

Posted by: Amy1122 | November 10, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Betty “new puppy for the White House should be a Rottwailer and it’s name should be “Lipstick”.
I heardd that too I think hte suggestion was sent in by email and Charlie was just reading it.
I am so tried of the girl whining and complaining about the press and the way that they have treated her. Any damage done to Sarah Palin was do by her own mouth.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | November 10, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I believe we all must move on from this story however, I will state that all of the people saying these things about Mrs. Palin worked with her day in and day out. Yes, they are probably not to happy to lose but what did we see during the campain?
But Mrs. Palin was sitting down during those telling interviews answering those questions by herself. We seen what she knows and don’t know. On several occasions I was asking myself WHAT DID SHE JUST SAY If and I mean If the Republican party will bring her back in 2012 she will need ALOT OF study time…..

Posted by: Miss | November 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

WWW, my answers to your questions (and I hope the censor allows the links):
- Was it a fake video of the witch exorcist casting the witchcraft out of Sarah Palin?
Your interpretation is incorrect. The video depicts a pastor asking for protection AGAINST witchcraft. This may seem culturally strange to us but for this pastor, who is from Kenya, it isn’t.
- Was the video of Palin asking churchgoers to pray that soldiers are being sent out “on a task that is from God” a fake?
That is an incomplete quote. The full quote is “”Pray… that our leaders are sending [our soldiers] out on a task that is from God. We have to make sure there is a plan and the plan is God’s plan.” She is not assuming that this is God’s plan but that she prays that this task is in God’s plan. Sort of like the Lord’s prayer says, “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”
- Was the video of Sarah Palin telling the secessionists “Keep up the good work and God bless you,” a fake?
I watched the video and can’t figure out what the big deal is. What was she supposed to say, “I hope you drop dead and go to hades?” There was nothing to that story as evidenced by the NY Times retraction of their assertion that she was a member.
- Was it a fake video of the town hall meeting showing Palin speaking gibberish about oil exports?
I have no clue what video you are talking about.
- Was the “you can see Russia” Charlie Gibson video a fake?
Again, taken out of context. Here’s the full exchange with Charlie:
“PALIN: I do believe unprovoked and we have got to keep our eyes on Russia, under the leadership there. I think it was unfortunate. That manifestation that we saw with that invasion of Georgia shows us some steps backwards that Russia has recently taken away from the race toward a more democratic nation with democratic ideals.That’s why we have to keep an eye on Russia.
And, Charlie, you’re in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
GIBSON: What insight does that give you into what they’re doing in Georgia?
PALIN: Well, I’m giving you that perspective of how small our world is and how important it is that we work with our allies to keep good relation with all of these countries, especially Russia. We will not repeat a Cold War. We must have good relationship with our allies, pressuring, also, helping us to remind Russia that it’s in their benefit, also, a mutually beneficial relationship for us all to be getting along.”
- Was the “you can see Russia” Katie Couric video a fake?
I don’t have enough energy to look this up but maybe I should assume that once again the quote was taken out of context?
- Was the audio clip of Palin saying the legislative Troopergate report cleared her of “any hint of any kind of unethical activity” a fake?
Source please. And what unethical activity did they find?
- Was the video of the debate showing Palin winking and dodging questions a fake?
Well, take out the winking and I’d say that all 4 candidates did their fair share of dodging questions. And quite frankly, Biden had more errors of fact than any of them.
- Were the many videos of Palin’s stump speeches with the “thanks but no thanks” statement all fakes?
Can you provide some sources?
- Were the many videos of her stump speeches inciting the crowds with comments about Obama’s ‘terrorist connections’ all fakes?
Why does this upset people? Obama does have some rather questionable people in his past. You sure are bringing up a few about Gov. Palin so why should Obama’s associations be off limits? Ayers is an admitted former domestic terrorist and Obama did work with him. To what extent we will probably never know because that pesky paperwork of Obama’s keeps getting lost but they did associate with each other at some level.
- Was the audio of the prank phone call revealing a gullible, giggling, fawning Palin a fake?
She admitted that she got taken and the handler that allowed the call to go through has taken a remorseful stance. It’s unfortunate that she got punked but what can you do? I didn’t hear the actual call so I can’t judge her behavior.
WWW, believe me when I say that I am not a blinders-on Palin supporter. What I do believe in though, is fair treatment. I didn’t like it when people made a big deal out of the possibility that Obama is a Muslim. Number 1 – who cares if he’s Muslim? It’s quite an insult to Muslims to throw that around as a barrier to be President. Christianity does not have a lock on the White House. And Number 2 – It is a lie and shouldn’t be part of the dialogue.

Posted by: mak | November 10, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Sarah definitely knows Africa, she saw it thru the window on her way to Kuwait last year.

Posted by: Bud | November 10, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Question: Is she truly the new face of the Republican Party? If not, Sarah seems to think so!

Posted by: Teacher2012 | November 10, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Well what do you expect from a bunch of cruel cowards? Integrity and understanding?

Posted by: danito | November 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Woweeee!!!!
So Sarah Paline reassures us that she’s not so dumb after all. She knows that Africa is a continent. (She probably looked at an atlas a few minutes before.) So NOW, she’s qualified to run for president.
And then there’s all that furor over the wardrobe. She’s giving up the 5th Avenue wardrobe selected by the elitists of the RNC and she’ll go back to Out of the Closet. How gay!!!! She shops at their clothing stores, but damns their souls.
Frankly I am sick and tired of Sarah Palin. Why doesn’t she get out of politics and star in a soap opera. That’s her real calling. I’ve even got a winning title (borrowed from Carol Burnett): As the Stomach Churns.

Posted by: Bill | November 10, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I really don’t care anymore about the entertainment afforded by Sarah Pailin, or how the McCain campaign built her up as a hot political celebrity only to throw her under the bus. Where her accountability should lie should be in her inciting crowds several weeks ago, which produced, according to Newsweek and the Secret Service, a major increase in death threats against Obama. Nor am I happy that the forever publicity seeking Oprah has invited her to appear on her show. If Palin chooses to continue to be in the national spotlight, then she also chooses continued scrutiny. But at this point, I want no further scrutiny of her and wish she would just fade away and stay in the far northern regions of the planet. But then my wish is as likely as hell freezing over.

Posted by: kat | November 10, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

If I were her, I’d tell them, “Hey, you picked me, I didn’t pick you. So stop you’re whining!!!”

Posted by: Paula | November 10, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

And then there’s all that furor over the wardrobe. She’s giving up the 5th Avenue wardrobe selected by the elitists of the RNC and she’ll go back to Out of the Closet. How gay!!!!
Posted by: Bill
_________________________________
That’s quite interesting. Isn’t YOUR party the one that fights for gay marriage? Now you’re using the expression “how gay!!!!”
As for Palin’s shopping, has anyone, including you, actually followed her into a store and saw her shop with RNC money? I doubt it.
I think the ones going on the attack were either paid big money by the Democrats to do so and remain anonymous, or they are Democrats masquerading as members of the McCain team.
If these anonymous sources really have a case against Sarah Palin, why can’t they come out and show themselves and present their evidence? That’s what brave people do.

Posted by: marco | November 10, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Yes, of course. How cruel and unfair for the evil liberal media to ask her such deceptive and difficult questions. After all, how could we possibly expect a potential Vice President of the United States to answer with any specificity which magazines or newspapers he/she read regularly? Do you really think Biden could actually cite a Supreme Court case that he disagreed with BY NAME? The very idea just reeks of that evil elitism!!! It is crystal clear that Mrs. Sarah Palin is a woman of letters…a real maverick who is a mental giant.

Posted by: dano | November 10, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Ugh, this woman makes me sick! Thank god McCain and her did’nt win!I dont think I could have taken 4 years of seeing her face. Sarah Palin, go back to Alaska, and STAY THERE!!!

Posted by: Jeremy | November 10, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

You liberal flowering power idiots are all the same. You claim to be about women and women’s rights but there is lie in that claim, you are ONLY about liberal women. All of you loved hillary should atleast be able to see that hillary clung to a disgusting marriage where her husband cheated on her with many different women (that we know of) all in the hopes of advancing her political career. Palin rose politically by her own merits fighting corruption. She will be back in 2012, hopefully running with romney, and they together will have to clean up the mess left by the anti-American, socialist barry o.

Posted by: USpatriot | November 10, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen, and I use those terms loosely, GIVE IT A REST!
The only thing worse than a Liberal that looses and election is a Liberal that wins an election. You Won! Why do you insist on beating these issues to death!
1. What do you care how the RNC spends their money?
2. Why not worry about the one-sided reporting instead of where Sarah got her clothes? For example, what would the fawning press have said if John McCain had said he had visited all 57 states?
What about that revolting sign Obama stood behind at his “Press Conference.” you know the one that says “Office of The President Elect” What would they have said if McCain or Palin said that had only spoken to the living ex-Presidents and then tried to cover the gaffe with a bad attempt at humor involving Nancy Reagan.
I am sickened by the way Obama is being treated by the press. Instead of talking about the puppies why didn’t he talk about the qualifications for the next Sec Tres? We do have econimic problmes to face, rememeber?
Up until today I was a member of the Democratic party. I will be changing my party affiliation at my first opportunity.
BTW – In case you guys care, the new Messiah is playing outside the rules with the Change.gov web site. The .gov extension is reserved for official government web sites. There is no office of the President Elect. Do you think CNN will cover that? Is this “Change we can believe in?”
Tom

Posted by: Tom Macey | November 10, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Palin is a successful, Christian, pro-life, married, conservative, America loving woman. These characteristics are all the opposite of what flower power liberals stand for. She will be back, hopefully running with romney, and they will have to clean up the mess left by barry o. Higher taxes, weaker military, larger deficit. but hey- change is comin!!

Posted by: USpatriot | November 10, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

carlyonsue,
Saks Fifth Avenue: $49,425.74
Neiman Marcus: $75,062.63
Macy’s: $9,447.71
Barneys New York: $789.72
Bloomingdales: $5,102.71
Hair and make-up: $4,716.49
Those numbers aren’t that far off from $150,000. Of course they aren’t official totals at this point.

Posted by: WWW | November 10, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

U.S. Patriot: The most salient problem with your list of adjectives describing Palin is the word “Christian.” She may be a “Christian”…bully for her. I could not care less what she believes in. Therein lies the problem with your description. You see, there is a SEPARATION of church and state. Her religious beliefs – as anyone elses’s – should NEVER be a consideration in the politics of this nation. That is one of the major reasons Republicans were so soundly defeated. If Republicans wish to regain power, they must learn that America will not stand for their moral policing. Get back to strong defense and economic soundness!

Posted by: dano | November 10, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

mak,
I addressed your comments and provided references but my posts keep getting removed. Sorry.

Posted by: WWW | November 10, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Wow, Palin’s not too bright – during the election and now. She’ll never get anywhere in the GOP if she keeps dissing Republicans as jerks, nasty, etc. Frankly that’s ok with me. She’s a loose ditz headed cannon and I’d rather not hear from her again politically in the future anyhow.

Posted by: buzziea | November 10, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

US Patriot: Be sure you get the name RIGHT!
That’s Mr Barack H. Obama or Mr. President-Elect Obama or Mr. President!!! Ha Ha Ha!!!
By the way when she fails again,LOL, she will be cleaning up Bush’s mess not President Barack Obama’s work.
Did you get that, President Obama say it again, President Obama. Ha!
Oh and don’t get pissed because we Baracked the vote! Ha Ha Ha!!!

Posted by: GETITRIGHT | November 10, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

It is really a shame that the news media can affect the choice of the most powerful leader in the free world. Poll – 65% of the people felt the news media changed the outcome of the election.

Posted by: Form505 | November 10, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

How could anyone possibly listen to Sarah Palin and think she is even remotely intelligent enough to be a national leader? Even my 14 year old daughter was aghast when she heard her in the debate: “she sounds like a kid my age, not at all presidential”.
I have to laugh when people describe those who criticize her as sexist. To be fair to Sarah Palin, it’s not her fault that McCain shot himself in the foot by choosing her. She is not especially articulate or knowledgeable, and it’s not sexist to state the truth: that she can barely put together a cogent argument, especially if she is asked to think for herself without the aid of a script.
She will never make it on the national scene she is a auch a huge liability to the Republican party. They hastily chose her, and they regretted it later. I think 75% of America — and 99% of the rest of the world –is breathing a huge sigh of relief that we have someone intelligent and reasonable at the helm.

Posted by: MathMom | November 10, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Curt… by the way, concensus is not a pronoun. But by all means, please run Palin in 2012. I’d love to see another landslide for Obama.

Posted by: rukiding | November 10, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

I think Sara Palin was a breath of fresh air to the political realm…and if any other woman was going through what she was…for example…all the garbage that was being thrown at her..they would be going shopping as well..in fact I believe I would be going…more shopping…and compared to what the men spent on their suits…ooohhh whoops…we dont know what that was, do we….and as far as her Christianity…that gives her credibility in my book…consider no God in your life..that would leave you ignorant…like number 1…you wouldnt be able to figure out when life begins..when a baby is really a baby..even with ultrasounds staring at you…number 2…you wouldnt know that men are only supposed to marry women..and not other men…number 3…you would think its ok to kill a baby even if its born alive when you first tried to suck his brains out…number 4…you wouldnt know that people who work should not be forced to finance people who refuse to work and their lazy lifestyles…number 5..you might even think that taking stem cells from the carcass of dead children that you killed would help you save someone else’s life…
Wise up people…without God …you are ignorant…I dont care how many churches you want to picket…He wins in the end…everytime

Posted by: heaven bound | November 11, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Bye Bye Republicans! The really rich ones and those that pretend to be rich. If you put your country first as you stated in your campaigns and conventions then you will support president Barack Obama

Posted by: Stanley | November 11, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

I don’t understand what god loving americans have against flowers. Aren’t flowers a reflection of god?

Posted by: pdxpro | November 11, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

I’m just waiting for the nation’s euphoric bubble about Barack Obama to burst. I think it will probably happen just about the time he implements his spread the wealth plan and raids their 401ks and IRAs. I think when it happens people will fall out of love with him very quickly. He will no longer be their messiah and the love affair will definitely be over. I have a feeling that long before his term is over people will be calling for his impeachment!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 13, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

I also think that the African Americans who think that Barack Obama is their savior and will meet their every need and put their needs above everyone else’s, are in for a BIG disappointment! I think their euphoric bubble will burst, too, pretty soon!

Posted by: carlyonsue | November 13, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

I don’t watch any of your programming anymore and avoid your sponsors like Netflix whose subscription I dropped and let them know why. The sloppy journalism that is now not the exception but the norm becoming routine this year with the Presidential election has pushed many of us to the limit. This article with its retraction at the bottom about Sarah Palin is a case in point. There is not only no such thing as factchecking but ABC has become like one of the sensationalist publishers like the National Enquirer and then completely ignores very serious stories like real Bill Ayers’ history by allowing that bully pulpit interview without countering his lies with interviews by those who can dispute his lies like the FBI informants and employees who worked the Weather Underground case plus people like John Murtagh who lived through some of his bombs. Bill Ayers and his crew are in the ranks with Osama Bin Laden, Timothy Mc Veigh, and the abortion clinic bomber and not only has he been allowed to rewrite the history of his past since your network and others have allowed him, but this gives him credibility and recognition to pitch his criminal ideology to our children all over this country. I know as he was an invited speaker at my alma mater University of South Carolina and required reading which is appalling.

Posted by: Cindy Anderson | November 15, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.